epstein-index / content-documents /house-oversight-nov /0b /HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011377.md
robbd's picture
seed: site content tree, sharded for HF dir limits
af43568 verified
|
Raw History Blame Contribute Delete
2.14 kB
---
title: "House Oversight: Estate Documents (Nov 12) (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011377)"
source: "House Oversight: Estate Documents (Nov 12)"
sourceUrl: "https://www.justice.gov/epstein"
date: "2026-01-01"
category: "House Oversight"
eftaNumber: "HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011377"
ocrPages: 1
ocrChars: 1573
ocrElapsed: 0.0
parseTier: "external-legacy"
engine: "engine undisclosed (ep-nov-12.greg.technology mirror)"
externalSource: "greg-ep-nov-12"
externalLicense: "not granted"
externalCredit: "ep-nov-12.greg.technology"
externalUrl: "https://ep-nov-12.greg.technology"
---
74
H3VOGIU1
information, then the lawyers present arguments to your Honor
2
and
say, 'Wait a minute.
Some of the things that are in the
3
report aren't relevant to the case and, in fact, are going to
4 be highly
prejudicial for the jury.' That's why we're here
5 this morning asking for some of those things to be excluded.
6
For example, there are some references -- I won't
7
belabor the point -- but the references that we're making to
8
some of the illegal drug usage and so forth, that's not
9
something
we're trying to deploy affirmatively. The good
10
doctor
simply listed all of the information that had been
11
recited
as part of his report so that the lawyers and the judge
12
can now make a determination.
13
And the fact that Ms. Giuffre told Dr. Kliman in a
14
confidential psychiatric examination certain things about drug
15
use can't possibly go to her reputation because no one was
16
there who was assessing
what kinds of things might be going
on.
17
A similar point can be made about tax fraud. We're
18
told, "Well, your Honor, tax fraud goes to her reputation." I
19
suppose that goes to her reputation with some IRS agent who is
20
looking at a return, but it can't possibly go to a general
21
reputation that is at issue in this
case.
22
And once again, the cases that we cite in our briefs I
23
think make this point clear, there is a vast risk of
24
prejudicial effect to Ms. Giuffre because the jury is going to
25
think, oh, she's a tax cheat, and they're going to hold that
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011377