Datasets:
title: 'House Oversight: Estate Documents (Nov 12) (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021837)'
source: 'House Oversight: Estate Documents (Nov 12)'
sourceUrl: https://www.justice.gov/epstein
date: '2026-01-01'
category: House Oversight
eftaNumber: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021837
ocrPages: 1
ocrChars: 1055
ocrElapsed: 0
parseTier: external-legacy
engine: engine undisclosed (ep-nov-12.greg.technology mirror)
externalSource: greg-ep-nov-12
externalLicense: not granted
externalCredit: ep-nov-12.greg.technology
externalUrl: https://ep-nov-12.greg.technology
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 14 a little bit unnatural for you to be responding to questions that are being asked immediately to your right and not be looking directly at the examiner the entire time, but because this is being videotaped, it might be helpful if you can, to the extent that you're able, to look into the camera so that the jury for whom this may be played -- THE WITNESS: I see. MR. SCAROLA: -- at a later time gets to see your full face. THE WITNESS: All right. I hope you won't consider me rude then -- MR. SIMPSON: I will not consider -- it's good advice from your counsel and I will not consider you rude. THE WITNESS: Thank you. BY MR. SIMPSON: Q. I want to ask you some more questions about the scope of investigation. Would you agree that an allegation of serious misconduct by another person generally requires more investigation than a lesser serious type of allegation? A. Sure. That's a fair statement. Q. And so, for example, before accusing a person ROUGH DRAFT ONLY HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021837