epstein-index / content-documents /house-oversight-nov /11 /HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021837.md
robbd's picture
seed: site content tree, sharded for HF dir limits
af43568 verified
|
Raw History Blame Contribute Delete
1.62 kB
---
title: "House Oversight: Estate Documents (Nov 12) (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021837)"
source: "House Oversight: Estate Documents (Nov 12)"
sourceUrl: "https://www.justice.gov/epstein"
date: "2026-01-01"
category: "House Oversight"
eftaNumber: "HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021837"
ocrPages: 1
ocrChars: 1055
ocrElapsed: 0.0
parseTier: "external-legacy"
engine: "engine undisclosed (ep-nov-12.greg.technology mirror)"
externalSource: "greg-ep-nov-12"
externalLicense: "not granted"
externalCredit: "ep-nov-12.greg.technology"
externalUrl: "https://ep-nov-12.greg.technology"
---
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
14
a little bit unnatural for you to be responding
to questions that are being asked immediately to
your right and not be looking directly at the
examiner the entire time, but because this is
being videotaped, it might be helpful if you can,
to the extent that you're able, to look into the
camera so that the jury for whom this may be
played --
THE WITNESS: I see.
MR. SCAROLA: -- at a later time gets to see
your full face.
THE WITNESS: All right. I hope you won't
consider me rude then --
MR. SIMPSON: I will not consider -- it's
good advice from your counsel and I will not
consider you rude.
THE WITNESS: Thank you.
BY MR. SIMPSON:
Q.
I want to ask you some more questions about
the scope of investigation. Would you agree that an
allegation of serious misconduct by another person
generally requires more investigation than a lesser
serious type of allegation?
A.
Sure. That's a fair statement.
Q.
And so, for example, before accusing a person
ROUGH DRAFT ONLY
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021837