Datasets:
|
Download content-documents/house-oversight-nov/1c/HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011332.md from robbd/epstein-index: direct link, hf CLI and curl.
- Browser
- Download file 2.14 kB
-
https://huggingface.co/datasets/robbd/epstein-index/resolve/main/content-documents/house-oversight-nov/1c/HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011332.md
- Command line
-
hf download hf://datasets/robbd/epstein-index/content-documents/house-oversight-nov/1c/HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011332.md
-
curl -L -o HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011332.md https://huggingface.co/datasets/robbd/epstein-index/resolve/main/content-documents/house-oversight-nov/1c/HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011332.md
2.14 kB
| title: "House Oversight: Estate Documents (Nov 12) (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011332)" | |
| source: "House Oversight: Estate Documents (Nov 12)" | |
| sourceUrl: "https://www.justice.gov/epstein" | |
| date: "2026-01-01" | |
| category: "House Oversight" | |
| eftaNumber: "HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011332" | |
| ocrPages: 1 | |
| ocrChars: 1581 | |
| ocrElapsed: 0.0 | |
| parseTier: "external-legacy" | |
| engine: "engine undisclosed (ep-nov-12.greg.technology mirror)" | |
| externalSource: "greg-ep-nov-12" | |
| externalLicense: "not granted" | |
| externalCredit: "ep-nov-12.greg.technology" | |
| externalUrl: "https://ep-nov-12.greg.technology" | |
| 29 | |
| H3VOGIU1 | |
| she is noncompliant with her taxes. Defendant's purported | |
| 2 | |
| expert's evaluation | |
| of this | |
| is wholly flawed, as explained in | |
| 3 | |
| Ms. Giuffre's motion in limine on the same. | |
| 4 | |
| Similarly, Ms. Giuffre's taxes | |
| are wholly irrelevant | |
| 5 | |
| to this case. | |
| Even | |
| actions brought by the government, your | |
| 6 | |
| Honor, where the cause of action is centered on nontax | |
| compliance | |
| exclude evidence | |
| of prior tax noncompliance when it | |
| 8 | |
| takes the case too far afield of the issue being tried. | |
| 9 | |
| Courts also exclude this evidence under 403 if there's | |
| 10 | |
| no substantial nexus between the alleged tax noncompliance and | |
| 11 | |
| the matter at hand. | |
| Here, defendant fails to show any type of | |
| 12 | |
| substantial nexus to this defamation claim. None whatsoever. | |
| 13 | |
| Additionally, resolving Ms. Giuffre's tax compliance, | |
| 14 | |
| this is | |
| a point that's in dispute among | |
| the parties, and | |
| 15 | |
| resolving | |
| such an issue would also involve another mini trial | |
| 16 | |
| where Ms. Giuffre would put on evidence of her tax compliance | |
| 17 | |
| and, at the end of that mini trial, the jury would have no more | |
| 18 | |
| information whether | |
| or not defendant defamed Ms. Giuffre when | |
| 19 | |
| she called her a liar about being | |
| sexually abused. Trying to | |
| 20 | |
| make this an issue, this is simply a device for putting the | |
| 21 | |
| settlement agreement and the amount between Ms. Giuffre | |
| 22 | |
| Jeffrey Epstein into evidence. | |
| 23 | |
| As has been briefed extensively, such a settlement | |
| 24 | |
| payment is tax exempt under the United States law, but that's | |
| 25 | |
| all this is, it's a device to try to get an improper admission | |
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, | |
| P.C. | |
| (212) 805-0300 | |
| HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011332 | |