Datasets:
|
Download content-documents/house-oversight-nov/1f/HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011340.md from robbd/epstein-index: direct link, hf CLI and curl.
- Browser
- Download file 2.07 kB
-
https://huggingface.co/datasets/robbd/epstein-index/resolve/main/content-documents/house-oversight-nov/1f/HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011340.md
- Command line
-
hf download hf://datasets/robbd/epstein-index/content-documents/house-oversight-nov/1f/HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011340.md
-
curl -L -o HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011340.md https://huggingface.co/datasets/robbd/epstein-index/resolve/main/content-documents/house-oversight-nov/1f/HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011340.md
2.07 kB
| title: "House Oversight: Estate Documents (Nov 12) (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011340)" | |
| source: "House Oversight: Estate Documents (Nov 12)" | |
| sourceUrl: "https://www.justice.gov/epstein" | |
| date: "2026-01-01" | |
| category: "House Oversight" | |
| eftaNumber: "HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011340" | |
| ocrPages: 1 | |
| ocrChars: 1508 | |
| ocrElapsed: 0.0 | |
| parseTier: "external-legacy" | |
| engine: "engine undisclosed (ep-nov-12.greg.technology mirror)" | |
| externalSource: "greg-ep-nov-12" | |
| externalLicense: "not granted" | |
| externalCredit: "ep-nov-12.greg.technology" | |
| externalUrl: "https://ep-nov-12.greg.technology" | |
| 37 | |
| H3VOGIU1 | |
| that Edwards and Cassell made in this other lawsuit are somehow | |
| 2 | |
| binding on Ms. Giuffre. | |
| Edwards and Cassell had separate legal | |
| 3 | |
| counsel, Florida attorney | |
| Jack Scarola. Whatever was going on | |
| 4 | |
| in | |
| that case isn't binding | |
| on Ms. Giuffre. | |
| 5 | |
| Under the relevant rules, an attorney's statements are | |
| 6 | |
| binding on a client only on a matter within the scope of the | |
| relationship. | |
| And | |
| this | |
| vindicating separate professional | |
| 8 | |
| interests, this was not vindicating some interest of | |
| 9 Ms. Giuffre. | |
| 10 | |
| So for all those reasons, we ask that the defamation | |
| 11 | |
| litigation between Dershowitz and Edwards and Cassell be | |
| 12 | |
| excluded. Of course, you have the separate issue of Dershowitz | |
| 13 | |
| in front of you already. | |
| 14 | |
| Let me turn then to point number 19. Here again, we | |
| 15 have a narrow issue presented to your Honor. We are asking | |
| 16 | |
| that you exclude Judge Marra's ruling on the joinder motion. | |
| 17 | |
| As your Honor is well aware, | |
| the triggering event in this case | |
| 18 | |
| was when Ms. Giuffre, then known as Jane Doe Number 3, filed a | |
| 19 | |
| motion to join Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 | |
| in the Florida pro | |
| 20 bono Crime Victims Rights action. | |
| 21 | |
| NOW, | |
| Judge Marra denied that motion to join, but at | |
| 22 | |
| the same time he said, "The reason I'm denying the motion to | |
| 23 | |
| join is you can participate in the case in other ways without | |
| 24 | |
| being a formal party." | |
| He cited, and I quote, "Of course, Jane | |
| 25 | |
| Doe 3 can participate in this litigated effort to vindicate the | |
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, | |
| P.C. | |
| (212) 805-0300 | |
| HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011340 | |