epstein-index / content-documents /house-oversight-nov /1f /HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011340.md
robbd's picture
seed: site content tree, sharded for HF dir limits
af43568 verified
|
Raw History Blame Contribute Delete
2.07 kB
---
title: "House Oversight: Estate Documents (Nov 12) (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011340)"
source: "House Oversight: Estate Documents (Nov 12)"
sourceUrl: "https://www.justice.gov/epstein"
date: "2026-01-01"
category: "House Oversight"
eftaNumber: "HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011340"
ocrPages: 1
ocrChars: 1508
ocrElapsed: 0.0
parseTier: "external-legacy"
engine: "engine undisclosed (ep-nov-12.greg.technology mirror)"
externalSource: "greg-ep-nov-12"
externalLicense: "not granted"
externalCredit: "ep-nov-12.greg.technology"
externalUrl: "https://ep-nov-12.greg.technology"
---
37
H3VOGIU1
that Edwards and Cassell made in this other lawsuit are somehow
2
binding on Ms. Giuffre.
Edwards and Cassell had separate legal
3
counsel, Florida attorney
Jack Scarola. Whatever was going on
4
in
that case isn't binding
on Ms. Giuffre.
5
Under the relevant rules, an attorney's statements are
6
binding on a client only on a matter within the scope of the
relationship.
And
this
vindicating separate professional
8
interests, this was not vindicating some interest of
9 Ms. Giuffre.
10
So for all those reasons, we ask that the defamation
11
litigation between Dershowitz and Edwards and Cassell be
12
excluded. Of course, you have the separate issue of Dershowitz
13
in front of you already.
14
Let me turn then to point number 19. Here again, we
15 have a narrow issue presented to your Honor. We are asking
16
that you exclude Judge Marra's ruling on the joinder motion.
17
As your Honor is well aware,
the triggering event in this case
18
was when Ms. Giuffre, then known as Jane Doe Number 3, filed a
19
motion to join Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2
in the Florida pro
20 bono Crime Victims Rights action.
21
NOW,
Judge Marra denied that motion to join, but at
22
the same time he said, "The reason I'm denying the motion to
23
join is you can participate in the case in other ways without
24
being a formal party."
He cited, and I quote, "Of course, Jane
25
Doe 3 can participate in this litigated effort to vindicate the
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS,
P.C.
(212) 805-0300
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011340