epstein-index / content-documents /house-oversight-nov /21 /HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015888.md
robbd's picture
seed: site content tree, sharded for HF dir limits
af43568 verified
|
Raw History Blame Contribute Delete
1.67 kB
metadata
title: 'House Oversight: Estate Documents (Nov 12) (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015888)'
source: 'House Oversight: Estate Documents (Nov 12)'
sourceUrl: https://www.justice.gov/epstein
date: '2026-01-01'
category: House Oversight
eftaNumber: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015888
ocrPages: 1
ocrChars: 1105
ocrElapsed: 0
parseTier: external-legacy
engine: engine undisclosed (ep-nov-12.greg.technology mirror)
externalSource: greg-ep-nov-12
externalLicense: not granted
externalCredit: ep-nov-12.greg.technology
externalUrl: https://ep-nov-12.greg.technology

The Game of Math ne of my most vivid childhood memories is driving my mother through this phase: Me: "Why is a sponge wet?" My mother: "Because it has soaked up water." Me: "Why has it soaked up water?" My mother: "Because it has small holes in it." Me: "But what makes water wet?" My mother: "Because it is made of wet stuff"" a bit weak now. Me: "What is wet stuff?" You can ramble on indefinitely unpeeling a never-ending onion. Sometimes, if you are unlucky, you may get stuck in a loop. For example, "where did the chicken come from?" "An egg, "and where did the egg come from?"... Mathematics breaks this cycle! In mathematics, there is no danger of an infinite number of 'why' questions because at its core are a clearly defined set of absolute rules called axioms. You cannot ask the 'why' question of an axiom. It is a RULE! Starting from an absolute minimum of fundamental rules everything else is built up so that no step requires any leap of faith nor generates any contradiction. Let me give you a concrete example and, in the process, show you how numbers are defined. HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015888