Datasets:
title: 'House Oversight: Estate Documents (Nov 12) (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011382)'
source: 'House Oversight: Estate Documents (Nov 12)'
sourceUrl: https://www.justice.gov/epstein
date: '2026-01-01'
category: House Oversight
eftaNumber: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011382
ocrPages: 1
ocrChars: 1395
ocrElapsed: 0
parseTier: external-legacy
engine: engine undisclosed (ep-nov-12.greg.technology mirror)
externalSource: greg-ep-nov-12
externalLicense: not granted
externalCredit: ep-nov-12.greg.technology
externalUrl: https://ep-nov-12.greg.technology
79 H3VOGIU1 in the way that we did. 2 I'm just going to let my counsel address any final 3 issues. 4 MS. SCHULTZ: Your Honor, I don't have anything 5 further to say on motion in limine number 6. The defendant has 6 not given any valid reason or justification for introducing any 7 evidence of prior sexual assault that should be excluded for 8 all the reasons in the brief and the oral argument over these 9 two days. 10 With regard to drugs, there are voluminous medical 11 records presented here. Defendant's counsel has stood up and 12 said there are false statements to doctors and have suggested 13 that Ms. Giuffre is doctor shopping. I'll submit that the 14 records do not reflect that. 15 Defendant apparently seeks to introduce a jotted down 16 note here or there from medical records, but these are plainly 17 hearsay, and a sentence fragment in the middle of a medical 18 chart is not admissible evidence, it's hearsay. And then, 19 they're certainly not a party admission, they don't even 20 reflect the totality of what the conversation is between 21 patient and doctor. 22 Also, I would also submit that the prescription 23 records show that they are not doctor shopping to a mass 24 amounts of pills or medication. The prescription records speak 25 for themselves. You can count the number of pills that were SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011382