robbd commited on
Commit
15bdc03
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): c2ef9bc

MEMY-1805 marker2 court-doe-v-indyke-08673 (salt 4090): 271/271

Browse files
This view is limited to 50 files because it contains too many changes.   See raw diff
Files changed (50) hide show
  1. marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750825/EFTA02750825.md +247 -0
  2. marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750825/EFTA02750825.metadata.json +1039 -0
  3. marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750841/EFTA02750841.md +140 -0
  4. marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750841/EFTA02750841.metadata.json +335 -0
  5. marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750843/EFTA02750843.md +25 -0
  6. marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750843/EFTA02750843.metadata.json +109 -0
  7. marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750844/EFTA02750844.md +55 -0
  8. marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750844/EFTA02750844.metadata.json +143 -0
  9. marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750846/EFTA02750846.md +215 -0
  10. marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750846/EFTA02750846.metadata.json +1027 -0
  11. marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750864/EFTA02750864.md +99 -0
  12. marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750864/EFTA02750864.metadata.json +423 -0
  13. marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750866/EFTA02750866.md +39 -0
  14. marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750866/EFTA02750866.metadata.json +109 -0
  15. marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750867/EFTA02750867.md +39 -0
  16. marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750867/EFTA02750867.metadata.json +109 -0
  17. marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750868/EFTA02750868.md +39 -0
  18. marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750868/EFTA02750868.metadata.json +109 -0
  19. marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750869/EFTA02750869.md +27 -0
  20. marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750869/EFTA02750869.metadata.json +58 -0
  21. marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750870/EFTA02750870.md +46 -0
  22. marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750870/EFTA02750870.metadata.json +64 -0
  23. marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750870/_page_0_Picture_150.jpeg +3 -0
  24. marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750871/EFTA02750871.md +52 -0
  25. marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750871/EFTA02750871.metadata.json +193 -0
  26. marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750874/EFTA02750874.md +76 -0
  27. marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750874/EFTA02750874.metadata.json +318 -0
  28. marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750880/EFTA02750880.md +33 -0
  29. marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750880/EFTA02750880.metadata.json +90 -0
  30. marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750881/EFTA02750881.md +23 -0
  31. marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750881/EFTA02750881.metadata.json +58 -0
  32. marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750882/EFTA02750882.md +426 -0
  33. marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750882/EFTA02750882.metadata.json +941 -0
  34. marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750882/_page_5_Picture_3.jpeg +3 -0
  35. marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750898/EFTA02750898.md +31 -0
  36. marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750898/EFTA02750898.metadata.json +170 -0
  37. marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750900/EFTA02750900.md +37 -0
  38. marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750900/EFTA02750900.metadata.json +109 -0
  39. marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750901/EFTA02750901.md +43 -0
  40. marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750901/EFTA02750901.metadata.json +139 -0
  41. marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750903/EFTA02750903.md +43 -0
  42. marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750903/EFTA02750903.metadata.json +151 -0
  43. marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750905/EFTA02750905.md +62 -0
  44. marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750905/EFTA02750905.metadata.json +139 -0
  45. marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750907/EFTA02750907.md +43 -0
  46. marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750907/EFTA02750907.metadata.json +96 -0
  47. marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750909/EFTA02750909.md +27 -0
  48. marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750909/EFTA02750909.metadata.json +92 -0
  49. marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750911/EFTA02750911.md +37 -0
  50. marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750911/EFTA02750911.metadata.json +151 -0
marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750825/EFTA02750825.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,247 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ #### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
2
+
3
+ JANE DOE,
4
+
5
+ Plaintiff,
6
+
7
+ v.
8
+
9
+ DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, in their capacities as the executors of the ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN,
10
+
11
+ Defendants.
12
+
13
+ Case No.
14
+
15
+ JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
16
+
17
+ COMPLAINT
18
+
19
+ Plaintiff Jane Doe ("Doe" or "Plaintiff') alleges, upon personal knowledge and information and belief, as follows:
20
+
21
+ ## INTRODUCTION
22
+
23
+ I. Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") was one of the world's most powerful, prolific, and notorious pedophiles. For years, he exploited and sexually assaulted dozens if not hundreds of young vulnerable girls for his personal satisfaction. He molested, fondled, and raped them, luring them to his home under the pretext that they would be giving him a "massage," and then slowly escalated his abuse. He paid what was for them much needed, life-changing amounts of money so that they would return to him and he could continue his cycle of exploitation and abuse.
24
+
25
+ 2. A successful businessman, Epstein applied all of his finely honed skills to acquiring access to more and more young girls. His staff provided a seemingly endless series of children who would come to his home—often multiple girls at the same time. The girls would sit in a waiting room while Epstein finished assaulting the child who came before them. In just one day, Epstein would sexually assault multiple girls in his private, well-guarded homes. And, at least from in or around 2002 to in or around 2005, Epstein did so regularly. Each girl was paid by Epstein or his staff.
26
+
27
+ 3. Plaintiff Jane Doe is one of Epstein's many victims. She met him when she was fourteen years old or younger, in or around 2002. For the following three years, Epstein routinely abused and exploited Doe at his home in New York City.
28
+
29
+ 4. In July 2019, Epstein was arrested and charged for his abuse of Doe and others in an indictment filed by the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (the "Indictment"). As alleged in the Indictment, over the course of many years, Epstein sexually exploited and abused dozens of minor girls at his homes in New York City, Palm
30
+
31
+ Beach, Florida, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and other locations. Upon information and belief, Plaintiff Jane Doe is the person described as "Minor Victim-1" in the Indictment.
32
+
33
+ 5. Not surprisingly, Epstein's abuse of Doe has forever scarred her and altered her life. As a result of his abuse, Doe never received a high school education. She suffers from post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety, and depression. Her severe emotional injuries manifest in myriad ways: she often finds herself crying; she is unable to form healthy emotional relationships with men; she often cannot sleep through the night or fall asleep at all; she has panic attacks; and she is constantly afraid for her young daughter.
34
+
35
+ 6. Epstein, by contrast, was able to operate his brazen sex trafficking scheme with relative impunity for most of his life. He used his money and connections to ensure that he and his co-conspirators would never face true justice for their heinous crimes. And, now, with his reported suicide on August 10, 2019, Epstein cannot be tried for being the criminal that he was. But, at the very least, the victims of his crimes, like Jane Doe, can obtain recovery for all the harm that he caused them.
36
+
37
+ ## THE PARTIES
38
+
39
+ 7. Plaintiff Jane Doe is a citizen of the State of New York. At all times relevant to this suit, Doe was a minor child living in New York City.
40
+
41
+ 8. Defendant Darren K. Indyke is sued in his capacity as an appointed executor of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein.
42
+
43
+ 9. Defendant Richard D. Kahn is sued in his capacity as an appointed executor of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein.
44
+
45
+ ## JURISDICTION AND VENUE
46
+
47
+ 10. Plaintiff is domiciled in New York.
48
+
49
+ II. Jeffrey Epstein was a citizen of the United States domiciled in the U.S. Virgin Islands at the time of his death. As the legal representatives of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn are deemed citizens of the U.S. Virgin Islands, and jurisdiction in this Court is therefore proper. 28 U.S.C. § 1332(cX2).
50
+
51
+ 12. At all times material to the events alleged herein, Plaintiff resided in New York, New York, and Defendant maintained a residence in New York, New York.
52
+
53
+ 13. All of the events giving rise to these causes of action occurred in the Southern District of New York, thus venue in this district is proper. 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).
54
+
55
+ ### JURY DEMAND
56
+
57
+ 14. Plaintiff hereby demands a trial by jury on all of her claims in this action.
58
+
59
+ ## FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
60
+
61
+ ## Defendant Epstein's Scheme of Exploitation and Abuse
62
+
63
+ 15. Defendant Jeffrey Epstein was born in Brooklyn in 1953.
64
+
65
+ 16. Epstein graduated from a public high school in Brooklyn, and later took college classes at Union and New York University. After briefly working as a teacher at a prestigious private school in Manhattan and as a partner at Bear Stems, in 1981 Epstein established J. Epstein & Co., a money management business, which he operated until the time of his death.
66
+
67
+ 17. Little is known about the actual source or extent of Epstein's wealth, but by 1998 it is believed that Epstein owned: the largest private home in Manhattan at 9 East 71st Street; a 7,500 acre ranch in New Mexico; a mansion in Palm Beach, Florida; an apartment in Paris; a Boeing 727: and a private island in the U.S. Virgin Islands. By the early 2000s, Epstein became known as one of the wealthiest individuals in the United States, routinely socializing and working with many of the most powerful men in the world.
68
+
69
+ IS. Epstein put his extraordinary resources and wealth to work exploiting and abusing teenage girls. Whether at his homes in New York City or Palm Beach, or on his private island, Epstein created a vast enterprise designed to lure vulnerable children to his house, where he would subject them to varying types of sexual abuse.
70
+
71
+ 19. Epstein believed there was nothing wrong with his conduct. He spoke openly about his "interest in young women." He told a New York Times reporter that "criminalizing sex with teenage girls was a cultural aberration and that at times in history it was perfectly acceptable." In an attempt to justify his sexual interest in children, "he pointed out that homosexuality had long been considered a crime and was still punishable by death in some parts of the world," thereby equating homosexual relations between consenting adults with the sexual abuse of children.
72
+
73
+ 20. In 2008, Epstein entered into a non-prosecution agreement with the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (the "Non-Prosecution Agreement") after he was investigated for his sexual assault of young girls in Florida. Epstein agreed to plead guilty to just two counts of solicitation of prostitution under Florida state law and served just over one year in a local jail. While briefly incarcerated, Epstein was afforded extraordinary privileges, including being able to leave the jail to work in his office twelve hours per day, six days per week.
74
+
75
+ ## Plaintiff Jane Doe Becomes a Victim of Epstein's Scheme of Exploitation and kithse
76
+
77
+ 21. Jane Doe was born in 1988. For most of her life, Doe was raised by a single mother who supported Doe and her younger sister.
78
+
79
+ 22. Doe had a difficult childhood that was in many ways marked by financial strain. Doe's sister suffered from serious medical conditions that required extensive medical care. Doe always worried about whether her family had enough money and thought about how she could help her sister then and into the future.
80
+
81
+ 23. When she was approximately fourteen years old, in or around 2002, Doe was approached by a teenage girl from her neighborhood who appeared to be slightly older than Doe. The girl told Doe about an opportunity to earn money and offered to introduce her to a wealthy man. Doe would subsequently learn that this man was Epstein.
82
+
83
+ 24. By that time, Doe's family was in serious financial straits. Her mother and sister were sharing a bedroom. In order to pay their monthly rent, her family rented the other bedrooms in their apartment to strangers, leaving no room for Doe. Doc was forced to move out. She stayed with a rotating cast of friends and took odd jobs after school to try to help her family pay rent. Hoping to help her family and support herself, Doe agreed to meet Epstein.
84
+
85
+ 25. The girl brought Doe to Epstein's mansion at 9 East 71st Street. When they entered the mansion, they were greeted by a maid who showed them into a waiting room near the entrance to the mansion. Doe can recall thinking that the mansion looked like the castle in the fairytale "Beauty and the Beast," one of her favorite Disney movies at the time.
86
+
87
+ 26. After waiting a short period, a maid escorted the two girls to an elevator and led them from the elevator to a dimly lit room with a massage table in the middle, where she left the girls alone.
88
+
89
+ 27. Minutes later, Epstein entered the room wearing only a robe. He introduced himself as "Jeffrey," and asked Doe her name. Epstein also asked Doe her age, and she responded truthfully.
90
+
91
+ 28. Epstein then removed his robe and laid face down on the massage table.
92
+
93
+ 29. The girl who recruited Doe removed her shirt and indicated to Doe that she should do the same. As instructed, Doe removed her shirt and began to massage Epstein's back, with the other girl coaching her through what Epstein expected.
94
+
95
+ 30. During the massage, Epstein turned over onto his back, exposing his penis to the two girls. Epstein then began to touch his penis and directed Doe to pinch his nipples. Doe followed orders and touched Epstein's chest while he stared intensely at her and masturbated. Finally, Epstein ejaculated and then cleaned himself off with a towel.
96
+
97
+ 31. Afterwards, Epstein put on a robe and retrieved three hundred-dollar bills from his robe pocket, which he handed to Doe.
98
+
99
+ 32. Within a day or two, the other girl contacted Doe, and told her that Epstein wanted to see her again. She provided Doe with a phone number she could use to schedule another visit. Doe called the number and spoke with a woman who arranged for her to return to the house and Epstein.
100
+
101
+ 33. Doe returned to Epstein's mansion on 71st Street a few days later. As before, Doe was led to the massage room. Epstein entered the room wearing a robe. Having been instructed by the girl who brought her the first time to remove her shirt, Doe removed her shirt when Epstein came into the room. Topless, she rubbed Epstein's back, until he turned over and masturbated. Again, Epstein handed Doe three hundred dollars.
102
+
103
+ # Epstein's Abuse of Doe Escalates
104
+
105
+ 34. Doe returned to Epstein's home again and again. As described below, as her visits became more frequent, Epstein's sexual abuse of Doe became more severe.
106
+
107
+ 35. After several visits, Epstein began to touch Doe's bare chest while he masturbated at the conclusion of his massage. In earlier encounters, he touched Doe's chest only with his hands, but after a few visits he began to touch Doe's breasts with his lips and tongue.
108
+
109
+ 36. In subsequent visits, Epstein directed Doe to remove her pants, shirt, and bra so that she was massaging him while wearing only her underwear.
110
+
111
+ 37. Later, Epstein began to touch Doe's genitals over her underwear with a vibrator. In visits after that, he would pull Doe's underwear to the side and touch her genitals directly with a vibrator.
112
+
113
+ 38. Eventually, Epstein demanded that Doe be completely naked during his massages. On multiple occasions, Epstein demanded that Doe lay down on the massage table with him. Once she acquiesced, Epstein touched Doe's genitals with his fingers, inserting his fingers inside of her vagina and causing her pain. While hurting her, Epstein pushed Doe to moan in supposed pleasure and asked her whether she was "enjoying" what he was doing. He demanded that she orgasm and would not stop touching her until he believed that she had orgasmed.
114
+
115
+ 39. On other occasions, Epstein also placed Doe's hand on his penis and made her move her hand up and down his penis and fondle his testicles until he ejaculated. He moaned aggressively while forcing Doe to touch his penis and barked orders at her about how to touch him.
116
+
117
+ 40. On one occasion, Epstein brought Doe to a bedroom in his home instead of the massage room. In the bedroom, Doe encountered an unfamiliar naked adult woman lying in a bed. The woman appeared to be over the age of eighteen. Another young girl close in age to Doe was also in the room. Epstein directed Doe and the other girl to remove their clothing and get into the bed with the naked adult woman. While in the bed, Epstein directed Doe and the two others to touch his genitals and to touch one another's genitals.
118
+
119
+ 41. While Epstein physically and emotionally hurt and exploited Doe, a vulnerable young girl, she also became financially dependent on him. She stopped attending school and spent almost all her time "working" at his home, gratifying him sexually, or bringing other girls to do the same.
120
+
121
+ 42. All told, Doe was sexually assaulted by Epstein countless times over the course of three years.
122
+
123
+ 43. Doe's experience with Epstein fit within what is now known to have been a common pattern for the abuser. He would find vulnerable young girls who needed money and slowly test their boundaries—first asking them to remove their own clothes and massage him and then, over time, he would escalate his conduct, touching them in ways that would become more invasive, violent, and painful. As these children grew to rely financially on Epstein, he would only cause them more and more harm.
124
+
125
+ 44. As demonstrated by the above, Epstein treated the girls he abused in the same way Ghislaine Maxwell, his co-conspirator, viewed them: like "they[] [were] nothing, these girls," like "[t]hey [we]re trash."
126
+
127
+ # Epstein's Abuse of Doe Was Directly and Indirectly Facilitated by His Co-Conspirators
128
+
129
+ 45. Epstein was only able to repeatedly abuse Doe and countless other girls with the aid of his many co-conspirators. Some of Epstein's co-conspirators directly enabled his abuse of Doe by, for example, arranging for Doe to come to Epstein's home to be assaulted or by participating in assaults of Doe alongside Epstein. Other co-conspirators indirectly aided Epstein's abuse of young women by giving Epstein access to young women, providing him with
130
+
131
+ substantial funds, boosting his public profile, and helping to cleanse his public image after his 2008 prosecution.
132
+
133
+ 47. Two of Epstein's employees specifically facilitated his abuse of Doe. Epstein had two adult, female assistants who scheduled most of Doe's visits to Epstein's home and maintained regular contact with Doe. Upon information and belief, the assistants were and Lesley Groff.
134
+
135
+ 48. During scheduling phone calls, and Groff often asked Doe to bring other girls with her to Epstein's home. At times, and Groff directed Doe to bring with her specific girls who Epstein had assaulted before, requesting them by name.
136
+
137
+ 49. Though sometimes Epstein directly paid Doe after abusing her, Doe was often paid by or Groff. Doe was also paid by or Groff whenever she brought other girls to see Epstein.
138
+
139
+ 50. Upon information and belief, as described in Paragraph 40, Doe was sexually assaulted by another Epstein employee.
140
+
141
+ 51. Notably, and Groff were both listed in Epstein's 2008 Non-Prosecution Agreement as potential co-conspirators in Epstein's crimes.
142
+
143
+ 52. Epstein paid hundreds of thousands of dollars to his potential co-conspirators in November 2018, shortly after a newspaper reported on the unusually lenient Non-Prosecution Agreement Epstein received in 2008, which suggests that Epstein was trying to buy his coconspirators' silence.
144
+
145
+ 53. In addition to assistance provided by Epstein's employees, Epstein built and benefined from a vast network of powerful supporters, including billionaires, prominent researchers, and former and current politicians, who provided him with access, opportunity, and means to abuse young women, and who helped to repair his public image after his 2008 prosecution.
146
+
147
+ # Doe's Life Is Materia I IN and Negatively Altered by Epstein's Abuse
148
+
149
+ 54. When Doe turned seventeen, she decided to extricate herself from Epstein. But by that time, Epstein's abuse of Doe had already materially and negatively altered her life.
150
+
151
+ 55. Without a high school diploma, and with a very low sense of her own self-worth, Doe was forced to take dangerous and often degrading jobs. She still has not been able to complete high school, though she hopes to do so in the future.
152
+
153
+ 56. For more than a decade, Doe has suffered from severe mental anguish because of Epstein's abuse. She suffers from extreme anxiety and depression, which cause her to experience difficulty falling asleep, difficulty staying asleep (because she often wakes up with nightmares), difficulty eating, rapid heartbeat, and panic attacks. Her physical and emotional injuries impact her daily functioning, making it difficult to go to work and take care of her young daughter and her ailing mother.
154
+
155
+ 57. Doe has been diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in connection with Epstein's sexual abuse. She regularly experiences the symptoms of PTSD, including flashbacks to Epstein's abuse, which make it difficult for her to take care of herself and her family.
156
+
157
+ 58. Doe struggles to be physically and emotionally intimate with her husband because of the negative associations she now has with intimacy based on her traumatic experiences with Epstein.
158
+
159
+ 59. Doe also struggles to be the mother she wants to be for her daughter. She is terrified to let her daughter interact with adult men because all she can think about is what
160
+
161
+ Epstein did to her. Doe also feels scared and uncomfortable when anyone—even a trusted loved one—touches her daughter because of her overwhelming fear that what happened to Doe might happen to her daughter.
162
+
163
+ 60. All of these harms can be traced directly to Epstein and his co-conspirators.
164
+
165
+ ### Epstein's Recent Criminal Case, Death, and Will
166
+
167
+ 61. In March 2019, Plaintiff was contacted by authorities investigating Epstein's decades-long scheme to abuse and exploit children. Plaintiff confidentially cooperated with the investigation, recounting Epstein's abuse in painstaking detail over the course of many meetings.
168
+
169
+ 62. In July 2019, Epstein was indicted by the Unites States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, based in large part on information provided by Plaintiff. Indeed, upon information and belief, Plaintiff was identified as "Minor Victim-I" in the Indictment and was the only victim in the Indictment who Epstein had assaulted in New York.
170
+
171
+ 63. On August 10, 2019, Epstein was found dead in his jail cell at the Metropolitan Correctional Center, where he was being held pending trial. Upon information and belief, New York City's medical examiner concluded Epstein died by suicide.
172
+
173
+ 64. On August 15, 2019, Epstein's last will and testament (the "Will") was filed in the Probate Division of the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands.
174
+
175
+ 65. The Will indicated that it was executed by Epstein on August 8, 2019 at the Metropolitan Correctional Center, and that it was witnessed by Mariel Colon Miro and Gulnora Tali. The Will was accompanied by affidavits from Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn attesting to their "Oath of Willingness to Serve as Executor and Appointment of Local Counsel." Mr. Indyke and Mr. Kahn also filed a Petition for Probate and for Letters Testamentary in the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands.
176
+
177
+ 66. The Will's first article directs Epstein's executors "to pay from my estate all expenses of my last illness, my funeral and burial expenses, the administration expenses of my estate and all of my debts duly proven and allowed against my estate." The Will further directs that "after the payments and distributions provided in Article FIRST," Epstein "give[s] all of my property, real and personal, wherever situated...to the then acting Trustees of The 1953 Trust."
178
+
179
+ 67. On August 26, 2019, Defendant Darren K. Indyke filed a Certificate of Trust with the Superior Court for the Virgin Islands, confirming that he and Defendant Richard D. Kahn are the two Trustees of The 1953 Trust. See Certificate of Trust, In the Matter of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, Probate No. ST-19-PB-80 (Super. Ct. V.I. Aug. 26, 2019).
180
+
181
+ 68. On September 6, 2019, Magistrate Judge Carolyn P. Hermon-Percell of the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands ordered that Epstein's will be admitted to probate and authorized Mr. Indyke and Mr. Kahn to administer the estate. See Order for Probate, In the Matter of the Estate of Jetey E. Epstein, Probate No. ST- I 9-PB-80 (Super. Ct. V.I. Sep. 6, 2019); Letters Testamentary, In the Matter of the Estate of Jeftey E. Epstein, Probate No. ST-19-PB-80 (Super. Ct. V.I. Sep. 6, 2019).
182
+
183
+ # CAUSES OF ACTION
184
+
185
+ #### COUNT ONE Sexual Assault
186
+
187
+ 69. Plaintiff incorporates by reference all preceding paragraphs and re-alleges them as if set forth fully herein.
188
+
189
+ 70. On numerous occasions over three years, Epstein made violent sexual demands on Plaintiff while placing his hands on her body in a position of dominance and control and while touching Plaintiff in violent and invasive ways.
190
+
191
+ 71. These demands, often made when Epstein and Plaintiff were alone, were intended to frighten Plaintiff into submitting to Epstein's sexual demands and placed Plaintiff in apprehension of harm.
192
+
193
+ 72. This conduct caused Plaintiff serious and persistent harm and contributed to injuries that Plaintiff continues to suffer.
194
+
195
+ 73. This cause of action is timely under the Child Victims Act, N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 214-g (McKinney 2019), because it arises out of conduct perpetrated against Plaintiff when she was under the age of 18 that constitutes a sexual offense as defined in Article One Hundred Thirty of the New York Penal Law ("Article 130"). See N.Y. P.L. § 130.52; N.Y. P.L. § 130.55.
196
+
197
+ #### COUNT TWO Sexual Battery
198
+
199
+ 74. Plaintiff incorporates by reference all preceding paragraphs and re-alleges them as if set forth fully herein.
200
+
201
+ 75. On numerous occasions over three years, Epstein intentionally, violently, and invasively used his fingers, lips, tongue, mouth, and foreign objects to make unwanted, unlawful, hannful, and offensive physical contact with Plaintiff's body.
202
+
203
+ 76. This conduct caused Plaintiff serious and persistent harm and contributed to injuries that Plaintiff continues to suffer.
204
+
205
+ 77. This cause of action is timely under the Child Victims Act, N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 214-g (McKinney 2019), because it arises out of conduct perpetrated against Plaintiff when she was under the age of 18 that constitutes a sexual offense as defined in Article One Hundred Thirty of the New York Penal Law ("Article 130"). See N.Y. P.L. § 130.52; N.Y. P.L. § 130.55.
206
+
207
+ #### COUNT THREE Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress
208
+
209
+ 78. Plaintiff incorporates by reference all preceding paragraphs and re-alleges them as if set forth fully herein.
210
+
211
+ 79. Epstein's three-year campaign of sexual abuse against a teenaged Plaintiff was extreme and outrageous conduct that shocks the conscience.
212
+
213
+ 80. Epstein's serial sexual assaults, committed during the course of a methodical plan of recruitment, enticement, and attack, inflicted severe pain and anguish upon Plaintiff.
214
+
215
+ 81. Epstein directed this conduct at Plaintiff and knew that it would cause severe and lasting emotional distress. Indeed, the conduct caused Plaintiff severe and lasting emotional distress and serious injuries to her mental health.
216
+
217
+ 82. This cause of action is timely under the Child Victims Act, N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 214-g (McKinney 2019), because it arises out of conduct perpetrated against Plaintiff when she was under the age of 18 that constitutes a sexual offense as defined in Article One Hundred Thirty of the New York Penal Law ("Article 130"). See N.Y. P.L. § 130.52; N.Y. P.L. § 130.55.
218
+
219
+ #### COUNT FOUR Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress
220
+
221
+ 83. Plaintiff incorporates by reference all preceding paragraphs and re-alleges them as if set forth fully herein.
222
+
223
+ 84. Epstein invited Plaintiff, then a teenaged girl, into his home for a period of three years. Once under his supervision, Epstein proceeded methodically to sexually abuse Plaintiff.
224
+
225
+ 85. Epstein's conduct was extreme and outrageous, breached a duty owed directly to Plaintiff, endangered her physical safety, and caused severe and lasting emotional distress and serious injuries to Plaintiff's mental health.
226
+
227
+ 86. This cause of action is timely under the Child Victims Act, N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 214-g (McKinney 2019), because it arises out of conduct perpetrated against Plaintiff when she was under the age of 18 that constitutes a sexual offense as defined in Article One Hundred Thirty of the New York Penal Law ("Article 130"). See N.Y. P.L. § 130.52; N.Y. P.L. § 130.55.
228
+
229
+ ### PRAYER FOR RELIEF
230
+
231
+ WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Jane Doe prays for this Court to:
232
+
233
+ 87. Issue a judgment declaring that Defendants, as legal representatives of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, are liable for the violations of law alleged in this case;
234
+
235
+ 88. Award actual, compensatory, statutory, consequential and punitive damages;
236
+
237
+ 89. Award pre-judgment and post-judgment interest at the highest rate allowed by law; and
238
+
239
+ 90. Grant such further relief as this Court may deem just and proper.
240
+
241
+ Dated: September 18, 2019
242
+
243
+ Roberta A. Kaplan Julie E. Fink Jenna M. Dabbs Justin Horton Alexandra K. Conlon (admission pending)
244
+
245
+ KAPLAN HECKER & FINK LLP 350 Fifth Avenue, Suite 7110 New York, New York 10118 Telephone: (212) 763-0883 Facsimile: (212) 564-0883 rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com jfink@kaplanheckencom jdabbs@kaplanhecker.com jhorton@kaplanhecker.com aconlon@kaplanhecker.com
246
+
247
+ Attorneys for Plaintiffs
marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750825/EFTA02750825.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,1039 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750825.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 16,
15
+ "chars": 25783,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 2.02,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 192.78000000000003,
27
+ 71.28
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 418.5074768066406,
31
+ 71.28
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 418.5074768066406,
35
+ 100.10302734375
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 192.78000000000003,
39
+ 100.10302734375
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "INTRODUCTION",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 1,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 255.204,
50
+ 126.35999999999999
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 356.9616394042969,
54
+ 126.35999999999999
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 356.9616394042969,
58
+ 141.7330322265625
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 255.204,
62
+ 141.7330322265625
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ },
66
+ {
67
+ "title": "THE PARTIES",
68
+ "heading_level": null,
69
+ "page_id": 2,
70
+ "polygon": [
71
+ [
72
+ 263.15999999999997,
73
+ 456.8399999999999
74
+ ],
75
+ [
76
+ 349.81378173828125,
77
+ 456.8399999999999
78
+ ],
79
+ [
80
+ 349.81378173828125,
81
+ 472.4830322265625
82
+ ],
83
+ [
84
+ 263.15999999999997,
85
+ 472.4830322265625
86
+ ]
87
+ ]
88
+ },
89
+ {
90
+ "title": "JURISDICTION AND VENUE",
91
+ "heading_level": null,
92
+ "page_id": 2,
93
+ "polygon": [
94
+ [
95
+ 221.54399999999998,
96
+ 648.8100000000001
97
+ ],
98
+ [
99
+ 389.5322570800781,
100
+ 648.8100000000001
101
+ ],
102
+ [
103
+ 389.5322570800781,
104
+ 664.1030120849609
105
+ ],
106
+ [
107
+ 221.54399999999998,
108
+ 664.1030120849609
109
+ ]
110
+ ]
111
+ },
112
+ {
113
+ "title": "JURY DEMAND",
114
+ "heading_level": null,
115
+ "page_id": 3,
116
+ "polygon": [
117
+ [
118
+ 258.876,
119
+ 291.6
120
+ ],
121
+ [
122
+ 353.7546081542969,
123
+ 291.6
124
+ ],
125
+ [
126
+ 353.7546081542969,
127
+ 306.7330322265625
128
+ ],
129
+ [
130
+ 258.876,
131
+ 306.7330322265625
132
+ ]
133
+ ]
134
+ },
135
+ {
136
+ "title": "FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS",
137
+ "heading_level": null,
138
+ "page_id": 3,
139
+ "polygon": [
140
+ [
141
+ 228.88800000000003,
142
+ 345.06
143
+ ],
144
+ [
145
+ 383.8851318359375,
146
+ 345.06
147
+ ],
148
+ [
149
+ 383.8851318359375,
150
+ 360.7330322265625
151
+ ],
152
+ [
153
+ 228.88800000000003,
154
+ 360.7330322265625
155
+ ]
156
+ ]
157
+ },
158
+ {
159
+ "title": "Defendant Epstein's Scheme of Exploitation and Abuse",
160
+ "heading_level": null,
161
+ "page_id": 3,
162
+ "polygon": [
163
+ [
164
+ 68.544,
165
+ 370.98
166
+ ],
167
+ [
168
+ 358.2493591308594,
169
+ 370.98
170
+ ],
171
+ [
172
+ 358.2493591308594,
173
+ 386.2330322265625
174
+ ],
175
+ [
176
+ 68.544,
177
+ 386.2330322265625
178
+ ]
179
+ ]
180
+ },
181
+ {
182
+ "title": "Plaintiff Jane Doe Becomes a Victim of Epstein's Scheme of Exploitation and kithse",
183
+ "heading_level": null,
184
+ "page_id": 4,
185
+ "polygon": [
186
+ [
187
+ 68.544,
188
+ 622.89
189
+ ],
190
+ [
191
+ 503.541748046875,
192
+ 622.89
193
+ ],
194
+ [
195
+ 503.541748046875,
196
+ 638.2330169677734
197
+ ],
198
+ [
199
+ 68.544,
200
+ 638.2330169677734
201
+ ]
202
+ ]
203
+ },
204
+ {
205
+ "title": "Epstein's Abuse of Doe Escalates",
206
+ "heading_level": null,
207
+ "page_id": 6,
208
+ "polygon": [
209
+ [
210
+ 69.156,
211
+ 594.54
212
+ ],
213
+ [
214
+ 243.65695190429688,
215
+ 594.54
216
+ ],
217
+ [
218
+ 243.65695190429688,
219
+ 610.4830169677734
220
+ ],
221
+ [
222
+ 69.156,
223
+ 610.4830169677734
224
+ ]
225
+ ]
226
+ },
227
+ {
228
+ "title": "Epstein's Abuse of Doe Was Directly and Indirectly Facilitated by His Co-Conspirators",
229
+ "heading_level": null,
230
+ "page_id": 8,
231
+ "polygon": [
232
+ [
233
+ 68.544,
234
+ 539.46
235
+ ],
236
+ [
237
+ 522.0701904296875,
238
+ 539.46
239
+ ],
240
+ [
241
+ 522.0701904296875,
242
+ 555.3630218505859
243
+ ],
244
+ [
245
+ 68.544,
246
+ 555.3630218505859
247
+ ]
248
+ ]
249
+ },
250
+ {
251
+ "title": "Doe's Life Is Materia I IN and Negatively Altered by Epstein's Abuse",
252
+ "heading_level": null,
253
+ "page_id": 10,
254
+ "polygon": [
255
+ [
256
+ 68.544,
257
+ 125.55000000000001
258
+ ],
259
+ [
260
+ 418.9159851074219,
261
+ 125.55000000000001
262
+ ],
263
+ [
264
+ 418.9159851074219,
265
+ 141.363037109375
266
+ ],
267
+ [
268
+ 68.544,
269
+ 141.363037109375
270
+ ]
271
+ ]
272
+ },
273
+ {
274
+ "title": "Epstein's Recent Criminal Case, Death, and Will",
275
+ "heading_level": null,
276
+ "page_id": 11,
277
+ "polygon": [
278
+ [
279
+ 68.544,
280
+ 181.44
281
+ ],
282
+ [
283
+ 325.0965270996094,
284
+ 181.44
285
+ ],
286
+ [
287
+ 325.0965270996094,
288
+ 196.4830322265625
289
+ ],
290
+ [
291
+ 68.544,
292
+ 196.4830322265625
293
+ ]
294
+ ]
295
+ },
296
+ {
297
+ "title": "CAUSES OF ACTION",
298
+ "heading_level": null,
299
+ "page_id": 12,
300
+ "polygon": [
301
+ [
302
+ 244.188,
303
+ 484.37999999999994
304
+ ],
305
+ [
306
+ 367.8373718261719,
307
+ 484.37999999999994
308
+ ],
309
+ [
310
+ 367.8373718261719,
311
+ 500.2330322265625
312
+ ],
313
+ [
314
+ 244.188,
315
+ 500.2330322265625
316
+ ]
317
+ ]
318
+ },
319
+ {
320
+ "title": "COUNT ONE \nSexual Assault",
321
+ "heading_level": null,
322
+ "page_id": 12,
323
+ "polygon": [
324
+ [
325
+ 265.608,
326
+ 510.29999999999995
327
+ ],
328
+ [
329
+ 346.6932067871094,
330
+ 510.29999999999995
331
+ ],
332
+ [
333
+ 346.6932067871094,
334
+ 539.9830169677734
335
+ ],
336
+ [
337
+ 265.608,
338
+ 539.9830169677734
339
+ ]
340
+ ]
341
+ },
342
+ {
343
+ "title": "COUNT TWO \nSexual Battery",
344
+ "heading_level": null,
345
+ "page_id": 13,
346
+ "polygon": [
347
+ [
348
+ 264.996,
349
+ 319.14000000000004
350
+ ],
351
+ [
352
+ 347.2320861816406,
353
+ 319.14000000000004
354
+ ],
355
+ [
356
+ 347.2320861816406,
357
+ 348.7330322265625
358
+ ],
359
+ [
360
+ 264.996,
361
+ 348.7330322265625
362
+ ]
363
+ ]
364
+ },
365
+ {
366
+ "title": "COUNT THREE \nIntentional Infliction of Emotional Distress",
367
+ "heading_level": null,
368
+ "page_id": 14,
369
+ "polygon": [
370
+ [
371
+ 192.78000000000003,
372
+ 71.92889404296875
373
+ ],
374
+ [
375
+ 419.193603515625,
376
+ 71.92889404296875
377
+ ],
378
+ [
379
+ 419.193603515625,
380
+ 100.10302734375
381
+ ],
382
+ [
383
+ 192.78000000000003,
384
+ 100.10302734375
385
+ ]
386
+ ]
387
+ },
388
+ {
389
+ "title": "COUNT FOUR \nNegligent Infliction of Emotional Distress",
390
+ "heading_level": null,
391
+ "page_id": 14,
392
+ "polygon": [
393
+ [
394
+ 197.06400000000002,
395
+ 468.98999999999995
396
+ ],
397
+ [
398
+ 415.443603515625,
399
+ 468.98999999999995
400
+ ],
401
+ [
402
+ 415.443603515625,
403
+ 498.7330322265625
404
+ ],
405
+ [
406
+ 197.06400000000002,
407
+ 498.7330322265625
408
+ ]
409
+ ]
410
+ },
411
+ {
412
+ "title": "PRAYER FOR RELIEF",
413
+ "heading_level": null,
414
+ "page_id": 15,
415
+ "polygon": [
416
+ [
417
+ 240.516,
418
+ 181.44
419
+ ],
420
+ [
421
+ 372.47991943359375,
422
+ 181.44
423
+ ],
424
+ [
425
+ 372.47991943359375,
426
+ 196.4830322265625
427
+ ],
428
+ [
429
+ 240.516,
430
+ 196.4830322265625
431
+ ]
432
+ ]
433
+ }
434
+ ],
435
+ "page_stats": [
436
+ {
437
+ "page_id": 0,
438
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
439
+ "block_counts": [
440
+ [
441
+ "Span",
442
+ 29
443
+ ],
444
+ [
445
+ "Line",
446
+ 15
447
+ ],
448
+ [
449
+ "Text",
450
+ 8
451
+ ],
452
+ [
453
+ "PageFooter",
454
+ 2
455
+ ],
456
+ [
457
+ "PageHeader",
458
+ 1
459
+ ],
460
+ [
461
+ "SectionHeader",
462
+ 1
463
+ ]
464
+ ],
465
+ "block_metadata": {
466
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
467
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
468
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
469
+ "previous_text": "",
470
+ "previous_type": "",
471
+ "previous_order": 0
472
+ }
473
+ },
474
+ {
475
+ "page_id": 1,
476
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
477
+ "block_counts": [
478
+ [
479
+ "Span",
480
+ 56
481
+ ],
482
+ [
483
+ "Line",
484
+ 27
485
+ ],
486
+ [
487
+ "Text",
488
+ 5
489
+ ],
490
+ [
491
+ "PageFooter",
492
+ 2
493
+ ],
494
+ [
495
+ "PageHeader",
496
+ 1
497
+ ],
498
+ [
499
+ "SectionHeader",
500
+ 1
501
+ ]
502
+ ],
503
+ "block_metadata": {
504
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
505
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
506
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
507
+ "previous_text": "",
508
+ "previous_type": "",
509
+ "previous_order": 0
510
+ }
511
+ },
512
+ {
513
+ "page_id": 2,
514
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
515
+ "block_counts": [
516
+ [
517
+ "Span",
518
+ 53
519
+ ],
520
+ [
521
+ "Line",
522
+ 26
523
+ ],
524
+ [
525
+ "Text",
526
+ 7
527
+ ],
528
+ [
529
+ "SectionHeader",
530
+ 2
531
+ ],
532
+ [
533
+ "PageFooter",
534
+ 2
535
+ ],
536
+ [
537
+ "PageHeader",
538
+ 1
539
+ ]
540
+ ],
541
+ "block_metadata": {
542
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
543
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
544
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
545
+ "previous_text": "",
546
+ "previous_type": "",
547
+ "previous_order": 0
548
+ }
549
+ },
550
+ {
551
+ "page_id": 3,
552
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
553
+ "block_counts": [
554
+ [
555
+ "Span",
556
+ 49
557
+ ],
558
+ [
559
+ "Line",
560
+ 25
561
+ ],
562
+ [
563
+ "Text",
564
+ 7
565
+ ],
566
+ [
567
+ "SectionHeader",
568
+ 3
569
+ ],
570
+ [
571
+ "PageFooter",
572
+ 2
573
+ ],
574
+ [
575
+ "PageHeader",
576
+ 1
577
+ ]
578
+ ],
579
+ "block_metadata": {
580
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
581
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
582
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
583
+ "previous_text": "",
584
+ "previous_type": "",
585
+ "previous_order": 0
586
+ }
587
+ },
588
+ {
589
+ "page_id": 4,
590
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
591
+ "block_counts": [
592
+ [
593
+ "Span",
594
+ 51
595
+ ],
596
+ [
597
+ "Line",
598
+ 26
599
+ ],
600
+ [
601
+ "Text",
602
+ 5
603
+ ],
604
+ [
605
+ "PageFooter",
606
+ 2
607
+ ],
608
+ [
609
+ "PageHeader",
610
+ 1
611
+ ],
612
+ [
613
+ "SectionHeader",
614
+ 1
615
+ ]
616
+ ],
617
+ "block_metadata": {
618
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
619
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
620
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
621
+ "previous_text": "",
622
+ "previous_type": "",
623
+ "previous_order": 0
624
+ }
625
+ },
626
+ {
627
+ "page_id": 5,
628
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
629
+ "block_counts": [
630
+ [
631
+ "Span",
632
+ 51
633
+ ],
634
+ [
635
+ "Line",
636
+ 26
637
+ ],
638
+ [
639
+ "Text",
640
+ 6
641
+ ],
642
+ [
643
+ "PageFooter",
644
+ 2
645
+ ],
646
+ [
647
+ "PageHeader",
648
+ 1
649
+ ]
650
+ ],
651
+ "block_metadata": {
652
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
653
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
654
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
655
+ "previous_text": "",
656
+ "previous_type": "",
657
+ "previous_order": 0
658
+ }
659
+ },
660
+ {
661
+ "page_id": 6,
662
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
663
+ "block_counts": [
664
+ [
665
+ "Span",
666
+ 49
667
+ ],
668
+ [
669
+ "Line",
670
+ 25
671
+ ],
672
+ [
673
+ "Text",
674
+ 7
675
+ ],
676
+ [
677
+ "PageFooter",
678
+ 2
679
+ ],
680
+ [
681
+ "PageHeader",
682
+ 1
683
+ ],
684
+ [
685
+ "SectionHeader",
686
+ 1
687
+ ]
688
+ ],
689
+ "block_metadata": {
690
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
691
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
692
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
693
+ "previous_text": "",
694
+ "previous_type": "",
695
+ "previous_order": 0
696
+ }
697
+ },
698
+ {
699
+ "page_id": 7,
700
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
701
+ "block_counts": [
702
+ [
703
+ "Span",
704
+ 58
705
+ ],
706
+ [
707
+ "Line",
708
+ 25
709
+ ],
710
+ [
711
+ "Text",
712
+ 6
713
+ ],
714
+ [
715
+ "PageFooter",
716
+ 2
717
+ ],
718
+ [
719
+ "PageHeader",
720
+ 1
721
+ ]
722
+ ],
723
+ "block_metadata": {
724
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
725
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
726
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
727
+ "previous_text": "",
728
+ "previous_type": "",
729
+ "previous_order": 0
730
+ }
731
+ },
732
+ {
733
+ "page_id": 8,
734
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
735
+ "block_counts": [
736
+ [
737
+ "Span",
738
+ 52
739
+ ],
740
+ [
741
+ "Line",
742
+ 26
743
+ ],
744
+ [
745
+ "Text",
746
+ 6
747
+ ],
748
+ [
749
+ "PageFooter",
750
+ 2
751
+ ],
752
+ [
753
+ "PageHeader",
754
+ 1
755
+ ],
756
+ [
757
+ "SectionHeader",
758
+ 1
759
+ ]
760
+ ],
761
+ "block_metadata": {
762
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
763
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
764
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
765
+ "previous_text": "",
766
+ "previous_type": "",
767
+ "previous_order": 0
768
+ }
769
+ },
770
+ {
771
+ "page_id": 9,
772
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
773
+ "block_counts": [
774
+ [
775
+ "Span",
776
+ 50
777
+ ],
778
+ [
779
+ "Line",
780
+ 26
781
+ ],
782
+ [
783
+ "Text",
784
+ 8
785
+ ],
786
+ [
787
+ "PageFooter",
788
+ 2
789
+ ],
790
+ [
791
+ "PageHeader",
792
+ 1
793
+ ]
794
+ ],
795
+ "block_metadata": {
796
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
797
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
798
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
799
+ "previous_text": "",
800
+ "previous_type": "",
801
+ "previous_order": 0
802
+ }
803
+ },
804
+ {
805
+ "page_id": 10,
806
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
807
+ "block_counts": [
808
+ [
809
+ "Span",
810
+ 52
811
+ ],
812
+ [
813
+ "Line",
814
+ 26
815
+ ],
816
+ [
817
+ "Text",
818
+ 7
819
+ ],
820
+ [
821
+ "PageFooter",
822
+ 2
823
+ ],
824
+ [
825
+ "PageHeader",
826
+ 1
827
+ ],
828
+ [
829
+ "SectionHeader",
830
+ 1
831
+ ]
832
+ ],
833
+ "block_metadata": {
834
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
835
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
836
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
837
+ "previous_text": "",
838
+ "previous_type": "",
839
+ "previous_order": 0
840
+ }
841
+ },
842
+ {
843
+ "page_id": 11,
844
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
845
+ "block_counts": [
846
+ [
847
+ "Span",
848
+ 55
849
+ ],
850
+ [
851
+ "Line",
852
+ 26
853
+ ],
854
+ [
855
+ "Text",
856
+ 7
857
+ ],
858
+ [
859
+ "PageFooter",
860
+ 2
861
+ ],
862
+ [
863
+ "PageHeader",
864
+ 1
865
+ ],
866
+ [
867
+ "SectionHeader",
868
+ 1
869
+ ]
870
+ ],
871
+ "block_metadata": {
872
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
873
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
874
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
875
+ "previous_text": "",
876
+ "previous_type": "",
877
+ "previous_order": 0
878
+ }
879
+ },
880
+ {
881
+ "page_id": 12,
882
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
883
+ "block_counts": [
884
+ [
885
+ "Span",
886
+ 52
887
+ ],
888
+ [
889
+ "Line",
890
+ 26
891
+ ],
892
+ [
893
+ "Text",
894
+ 5
895
+ ],
896
+ [
897
+ "SectionHeader",
898
+ 2
899
+ ],
900
+ [
901
+ "PageFooter",
902
+ 2
903
+ ],
904
+ [
905
+ "PageHeader",
906
+ 1
907
+ ]
908
+ ],
909
+ "block_metadata": {
910
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
911
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
912
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
913
+ "previous_text": "",
914
+ "previous_type": "",
915
+ "previous_order": 0
916
+ }
917
+ },
918
+ {
919
+ "page_id": 13,
920
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
921
+ "block_counts": [
922
+ [
923
+ "Span",
924
+ 49
925
+ ],
926
+ [
927
+ "Line",
928
+ 25
929
+ ],
930
+ [
931
+ "Text",
932
+ 7
933
+ ],
934
+ [
935
+ "PageFooter",
936
+ 2
937
+ ],
938
+ [
939
+ "PageHeader",
940
+ 1
941
+ ],
942
+ [
943
+ "SectionHeader",
944
+ 1
945
+ ]
946
+ ],
947
+ "block_metadata": {
948
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
949
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
950
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
951
+ "previous_text": "",
952
+ "previous_type": "",
953
+ "previous_order": 0
954
+ }
955
+ },
956
+ {
957
+ "page_id": 14,
958
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
959
+ "block_counts": [
960
+ [
961
+ "Span",
962
+ 56
963
+ ],
964
+ [
965
+ "Line",
966
+ 27
967
+ ],
968
+ [
969
+ "Text",
970
+ 8
971
+ ],
972
+ [
973
+ "SectionHeader",
974
+ 2
975
+ ],
976
+ [
977
+ "PageFooter",
978
+ 2
979
+ ],
980
+ [
981
+ "PageHeader",
982
+ 1
983
+ ]
984
+ ],
985
+ "block_metadata": {
986
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
987
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
988
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
989
+ "previous_text": "",
990
+ "previous_type": "",
991
+ "previous_order": 0
992
+ }
993
+ },
994
+ {
995
+ "page_id": 15,
996
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
997
+ "block_counts": [
998
+ [
999
+ "Span",
1000
+ 63
1001
+ ],
1002
+ [
1003
+ "Line",
1004
+ 32
1005
+ ],
1006
+ [
1007
+ "Text",
1008
+ 10
1009
+ ],
1010
+ [
1011
+ "PageFooter",
1012
+ 2
1013
+ ],
1014
+ [
1015
+ "PageHeader",
1016
+ 1
1017
+ ],
1018
+ [
1019
+ "SectionHeader",
1020
+ 1
1021
+ ],
1022
+ [
1023
+ "Caption",
1024
+ 1
1025
+ ]
1026
+ ],
1027
+ "block_metadata": {
1028
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
1029
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
1030
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
1031
+ "previous_text": "",
1032
+ "previous_type": "",
1033
+ "previous_order": 0
1034
+ }
1035
+ }
1036
+ ],
1037
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02750825"
1038
+ }
1039
+ }
marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750841/EFTA02750841.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,140 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ The JS-44 Ova cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replace nor supplement the filing and service of pleadings ce other papers as required by law, except as provided by local rules or court. This form, approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September 1974, is reputed for use of the Clerk of Court for the purpose of initiating the cml docket sheet.
2
+
3
+ #### PLAINTIFFS Jane Doe
4
+
5
+ ### ATTORNEYS (FIRM NAME. ADDRESS. AND TELEPHONE NUMBER
6
+
7
+ Roberta A. Kaplan
8
+
9
+ Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP
10
+
11
+ 350 Fifth Avenue. Suite 7110, New York, NY 10118
12
+
13
+ DEFENDANTS
14
+
15
+ Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, as executors for Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein
16
+
17
+ ### ATTORNEYS (IF KNOWN)
18
+
19
+ Erika A. Kellerhals and William Blum, Kellerhals
20
+
21
+ Palms Professional Building. 9053 Estate KroNin PLLC. . Suite 101
22
+
23
+ St. U.S. Virgin Islands 00802
24
+
25
+ ## CAUSE OF ACTION (CITE THE U.S. CIVIL STATUTE UNDER WHICH YOU ARE FILING AND WRITE A BRIEF STATEMENT OF CAUSE)
26
+
27
+ (DO NOT CITE JURISDICTIONAL STATUTES UNLESS DIVERSITY)
28
+
29
+ 28 USC 1332; New York causes of action
30
+
31
+ Has this action, case, or proceeding, or one essentially the same been previously filed in SONY at any time? No OYes0 Judge Previously Assigned
32
+
33
+ If yes. was this case Vol. O Invol. O Dismissed. No O Yes O If yes. give date & Case No.
34
+
35
+ Is THIS AN INTONATIONAL AISITIMTION CAW
36
+
37
+ ### (PLACE AN NW ONE BOX ONLY)
38
+
39
+ | TORTS | | PERSONAL INJURY | | PERSONAL INJURY | | FORFEITURE/PENALTY | | BANKRUPTCY | | OTHER STATUTES | |
40
+ |----------|--|---------------------------------------|--|----------------------------|--|-------------------------------------------------|--|-----------------------------------|--|------------------------------|--|
41
+ | CONTRACT | | PERSONAL INJURY | | PERSONAL INJURY | | FORFEITURE/PENALTY | | BANKRUPTCY | | OTHER STATUTES | |
42
+ | [ ] 110 | | INSURANCE | | [ ] 367 HEALTHCARE/ | | [ ] 625 DRUG RELATED | | [ ] 422 APPEAL | | [ ] 375 FALSE CLAIMS | |
43
+ | [ ] 120 | | MARINE | | PHARMACEUTICAL PERSONAL | | SEIZURE OF PROPERTY | | 28 USC 158 | | [ ] 376 QUI TAM | |
44
+ | [ ] 130 | | ACT | | INJURY/PRODUCT LIABILITY | | 21 USC 881 | | [ ] 423 WITHDRAWAL | | [ ] 400 STATE | |
45
+ | [ ] 140 | | NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT | | [ ] 365 PERSONAL INJURY | | PRODUCT LIABILITY | | 28 USC 157 | | REAPPORTIONMENT | |
46
+ | [ ] 150 | | RECOVERY OF OVERPAYMENT & ENFORCEMENT | | [ ] 368 ASBESTOS PERSONAL | | INJURY PRODUCT | | [ ] 690 OTHER | | [ ] 410 ANTITRUST | |
47
+ | [ ] 151 | | OF JUDGMENT | | [ ] 340 MARINE | | PROPERTY RIGHTS | | [ ] 480 CONSUMER CREDIT | | [ ] 430 BANKS & BANKING | |
48
+ | [ ] 152 | | MEDICARE ACT | | [ ] 345 MARINE PRODUCT | | [ ] 830 PATENT | | [ ] 470 RACKETEER INFLU- | | ENCED & CORRUPT | |
49
+ | [ ] 152 | | RECOVERY OF DEFAULTED | | [ ] 370 OTHER FRAUD | | [ ] 835 PATENT-ABBREVIATED NEW DRUG APPLICATION | | ORGANIZATION ACT | | (RICO) | |
50
+ | [ ] 153 | | STUDENT LOANS (EXCL VETERANS) | | [ ] 355 MOTOR VEHICLE | | [ ] 840 TRADEMARK | | [ ] 480 CONSUMER CREDIT | | [ ] 490 CABLE/SATELLITE TV | |
51
+ | [ ] 153 | | RECOVERY OF OVERPAYMENT | | [ ] 360 OTHER PERSONAL | | LABOR | | [ ] 861 HIA (1395ff) | | [ ] 850 SECURITIES/ | |
52
+ | [ ] 153 | | OF VETERANS' | | [ ] 362 PERSONAL INJURY - | | PROPERTY DAMAGE | | [ ] 862 BLACK LUNG (923) | | BENEFITS | |
53
+ | [ ] 160 | | SUITS | | [ ] 385 PROPERTY DAMAGE | | [ ] 710 FAIR LABOR | | [ ] 863 DIWC/DIWW (405(g)) | | COMMODITIES/ | |
54
+ | [ ] 160 | | STOCKHOLDERS | | [ ] 385 PROPERTY DAMAGE | | [ ] 720 LABOR/MGMT | | [ ] 864 SSID TITLE XVI | | EXCHANGE | |
55
+ | [ ] 190 | | SUITS | | [ ] 385 PROPERTY DAMAGE | | [ ] 720 LABOR/MGMT | | [ ] 865 RSI (405(g)) | | [ ] 890 OTHER STATUTORY | |
56
+ | [ ] 190 | | OTHER | | [ ] 463 ALIEN DETAINEE | | [ ] 740 RAILWAY LABOR ACT | | [ ] 865 RSI (405(g)) | | ACTIONS | |
57
+ | [ ] 195 | | CONTRACT | | [ ] 510 MOTIONS TO | | [ ] 751 FAMILY MEDICAL | | [ ] 870 TAXES (U.S. Plaintiff or | | [ ] 891 AGRICULTURAL ACTS | |
58
+ | [ ] 195 | | CONTRACT | | VACATE SENTENCE | | [ ] 751 FAMILY MEDICAL | | [ ] 870 TAXES (U.S. Plaintiff or | | [ ] 893 ENVIRONMENTAL | |
59
+ | [ ] 196 | | PRODUCT | | 28 USC 2255 | | LEAVE ACT (FMLA) | | [ ] 871 IRS-THIRD PARTY | | MATTERS | |
60
+ | [ ] 196 | | LIABILITY | | [ ] 530 HABEAS CORPUS | | [ ] 790 OTHER LABOR | | [ ] 871 IRS-THIRD PARTY | | INFORMATION ACT | |
61
+ | [ ] 196 | | FRANCHISE | | [ ] 535 DEATH PENALTY | | [ ] 791 EMPL RET INC | | [ ] 870 TAXES (U.S. Plaintiff or | | [ ] 895 FREEDOM OF | |
62
+ | [ ] 196 | | [ ] 440 OTHER CIVIL RIGHTS | | [ ] 540 MANDAMUS & OTHER | | [ ] 791 EMPL RET INC | | [ ] 870 TAXES (U.S. Plaintiff or | | [ ] 896 ARBITRATION | |
63
+ | [ ] 196 | | (Non-Prisoner) | | [ ] 440 OTHER CIVIL RIGHTS | | [ ] 791 EMPL RET INC | | [ ] 870 TAXES (U.S. Plaintiff or | | [ ] 899 ADMINISTRATIVE | |
64
+ | [ ] 210 | | LAND | | [ ] 442 EMPLOYMENT | | [ ] 462 NATURALIZATION | | [ ] 869 PROCEDURE ACT/REVIEW OR | | [ ] 950 CONSTITUTIONALITY OF | |
65
+ | [ ] 220 | | CONDEMNATION | | [ ] 443 HOUSING/ | | APPLICATION | | [ ] 850 CONSTITUTIONALITY OF | | [ ] 950 CONSTITUTIONALITY OF | |
66
+ | [ ] 230 | | FORECLOSURE | | [ ] 445 AMERICANS WITH | | [ ] 550 CIVIL RIGHTS | | [ ] 560 CONDITIONS OF CONFINEMENT | | [ ] 950 CONSTITUTIONALITY OF | |
67
+ | [ ] 230 | | RENT LEASE & | | [ ] 445 AMERICANS WITH | | [ ] 555 PRISON CONDITION | | [ ] 465 OTHER IMMIGRATION | | [ ] 950 CONSTITUTIONALITY OF | |
68
+ | [ ] 240 | | EJECTMENT | | [ ] 445 DISABILITIES - | | [ ] 560 CIVIL DETAINEE | | [ ] 465 OTHER IMMIGRATION | | [ ] 950 CONSTITUTIONALITY OF | |
69
+ | [ ] 240 | | TORTS TO LAND | | [ ] 446 AMERICANS WITH | | [ ] 550 CIVIL RIGHTS | | [ ] 465 OTHER IMMIGRATION | | [ ] 950 CONSTITUTIONALITY OF | |
70
+ | [ ] 245 | | TORT PRODUCT | | [ ] | | | | | | | |
71
+
72
+ No E Yes ❑
73
+
74
+ # NATURE OF SUIT
75
+
76
+ Check if demanded in complaint:
77
+
78
+ CHECK IF THIS IS ACLASS ACTION UNDER F.R.C.P. 23
79
+
80
+ DEMAND \$ OTHER JUDGE DOCKET NUMBER
81
+
82
+ DO YOU CLAIM THIS CASE IS RELATED TO A CIVIL CASE NOW PENDING IN S.D.N.Y. AS DEFINED BY LOCAL RULE FOR DIVISION OF BUSINESS 13? IF SO, STATE:
83
+
84
+ | <input checked="" type="checkbox"/> 1 Original Proceeding | <input type="checkbox"/> 2 Removed from State Court | <input type="checkbox"/> 3 Remanded from Appellate Court | <input type="checkbox"/> 4 Reinstated or Reopened | <input type="checkbox"/> 5 Transferred from (Specify District) | <input type="checkbox"/> 6 Multidistrict Litigation (Transferred) | <input type="checkbox"/> 7 Appeal to District Judge from Magistrate Judge | |
85
+ |-----------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|
86
+ | <input type="checkbox"/> a. all parties represented | | | | <input type="checkbox"/> 8 Multidistrict Litigation (Direct File) | | | |
87
+ | <input type="checkbox"/> b. At least one party is pro se. | | | | | | | |
88
+
89
+ (PLACE AN x IN ONE BOX ONLY)
90
+
91
+ **BASIS OF JURISDICTION**
92
+
93
+ 1 U.S. PLAINTIFF 2 U.S. DEFENDANT 3 FEDERAL QUESTION 4 DIVERSITY
94
+ (U.S. NOT A PARTY)
95
+
96
+ **IF DIVERSITY, INDICATE CITIZENSHIP BELOW.**
97
+
98
+ **CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES (FOR DIVERSITY CASES ONLY)**
99
+
100
+ (Place an [X] in one box for Plaintiff and one box for Defendant)
101
+
102
+ | CITIZEN OF THIS STATE | PTF [X] 1 | DEF [ ] 1 | CITIZEN OR SUBJECT OF A FOREIGN COUNTRY | PTF DEF [ ] 3 [ ] 3 | INCORPORATED and PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS IN ANOTHER STATE | PTF [ ] 5 | DEF [ ] 5 |
103
+ |--------------------------------|-----------|-----------|-----------------------------------------------------------|---------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|-----------|
104
+ | CITIZEN OF ANOTHER STATE [ ] 2 | [X] 2 | | INCORPORATED or PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS IN THIS STATE | [ ] 4 [ ] 4 | FOREIGN NATION | [ ] 6 | [ ] 6 |
105
+
106
+ PLAINTIFF(S) ADDRESS(ES) AND COUNTY(IES)
107
+
108
+ Jane Doe
109
+ Nassau County, New York
110
+ c/o Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP
111
+ 350 Fifth Avenue, Suite 7110, New York, NY 10118
112
+
113
+ DEFENDANT(S) ADDRESS(ES) AND COUNTY(IES)
114
+
115
+ DEFENDANT(S) ADDRESS UNKNOWN
116
+
117
+ REPRESENTATION IS HEREBY MADE THAT, AT THIS TIME, I HAVE BEEN UNABLE, WITH REASONABLE DILIGENCE, TO ASCERTAIN THE RESIDENCE ADDRESSES OF THE FOLLOWING DEFENDANTS:
118
+
119
+ Defendants are sued as executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. Per 28 USC 1332, Defendants are deemed citizens of the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI), decedent Epstein's domicile. Defendants' residential addresses are unknown to Plaintiff. Defendants' counsel listed above.
120
+
121
+ **COURTHOUSE ASSIGNMENT**
122
+
123
+ I hereby certify that this case should be assigned to the courthouse indicated below pursuant to Local Rule for Division of Business 18, 20 or 21.
124
+
125
+ Check one: THIS ACTION SHOULD BE ASSIGNED TO: [ ] PLAINS MANHATTAN
126
+
127
+ DATE SIGNATURE OF ATTORNEY OF RECORD
128
+
129
+ RECEIPT #
130
+
131
+ ADMITTED TO PRACTICE IN THIS DISTRICT
132
+
133
+ [ ] NO
134
+
135
+ [X] YES (DATE ADMITTED Mo.05 Yr. 1993 )
136
+ Attorney Bar Code #
137
+
138
+ Magistrate Judge is to be designated by the Clerk of the Court.
139
+
140
+ Magistrate Judge \_\_\_\_\_ is so Designated.
marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750841/EFTA02750841.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,335 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750841.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 2,
15
+ "chars": 12564,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 22.49,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "PLAINTIFFS \nJane Doe",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 35.4900016784668,
27
+ 82.128173828125
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 85.17119598388672,
31
+ 82.128173828125
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 85.17119598388672,
35
+ 100.11590576171875
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 35.4900016784668,
39
+ 100.11590576171875
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "ATTORNEYS (FIRM NAME. ADDRESS. AND TELEPHONE NUMBER",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 35.496,
50
+ 121.5
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 290.6543884277344,
54
+ 121.5
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 290.6543884277344,
58
+ 131.615966796875
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 35.496,
62
+ 131.615966796875
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ },
66
+ {
67
+ "title": "ATTORNEYS (IF KNOWN)",
68
+ "heading_level": null,
69
+ "page_id": 0,
70
+ "polygon": [
71
+ [
72
+ 310.896,
73
+ 121.5
74
+ ],
75
+ [
76
+ 413.1933898925781,
77
+ 121.5
78
+ ],
79
+ [
80
+ 413.1933898925781,
81
+ 131.61590576171875
82
+ ],
83
+ [
84
+ 310.896,
85
+ 131.61590576171875
86
+ ]
87
+ ]
88
+ },
89
+ {
90
+ "title": "CAUSE OF ACTION (CITE THE U.S. CIVIL STATUTE UNDER WHICH YOU ARE FILING AND WRITE A BRIEF STATEMENT OF CAUSE)",
91
+ "heading_level": null,
92
+ "page_id": 0,
93
+ "polygon": [
94
+ [
95
+ 35.496,
96
+ 164.628173828125
97
+ ],
98
+ [
99
+ 480.8994445800781,
100
+ 164.628173828125
101
+ ],
102
+ [
103
+ 480.8994445800781,
104
+ 175.76999999999998
105
+ ],
106
+ [
107
+ 35.496,
108
+ 175.76999999999998
109
+ ]
110
+ ]
111
+ },
112
+ {
113
+ "title": "(PLACE AN NW ONE BOX ONLY)",
114
+ "heading_level": null,
115
+ "page_id": 0,
116
+ "polygon": [
117
+ [
118
+ 35.496,
119
+ 276.21000000000004
120
+ ],
121
+ [
122
+ 168.68272399902344,
123
+ 276.21000000000004
124
+ ],
125
+ [
126
+ 168.68272399902344,
127
+ 286.8659362792969
128
+ ],
129
+ [
130
+ 35.496,
131
+ 286.8659362792969
132
+ ]
133
+ ]
134
+ },
135
+ {
136
+ "title": "NATURE OF SUIT",
137
+ "heading_level": null,
138
+ "page_id": 0,
139
+ "polygon": [
140
+ [
141
+ 245.61000061035156,
142
+ 274.1702880859375
143
+ ],
144
+ [
145
+ 332.2436828613281,
146
+ 274.1702880859375
147
+ ],
148
+ [
149
+ 332.2436828613281,
150
+ 287.5670471191406
151
+ ],
152
+ [
153
+ 245.61000061035156,
154
+ 287.5670471191406
155
+ ]
156
+ ]
157
+ },
158
+ {
159
+ "title": "ORIGIN",
160
+ "heading_level": null,
161
+ "page_id": 1,
162
+ "polygon": [
163
+ [
164
+ 299.88,
165
+ 33.21
166
+ ],
167
+ [
168
+ 338.43600000000004,
169
+ 33.21
170
+ ],
171
+ [
172
+ 338.43600000000004,
173
+ 43.74
174
+ ],
175
+ [
176
+ 299.88,
177
+ 43.74
178
+ ]
179
+ ]
180
+ },
181
+ {
182
+ "title": "BASIS OF JURISDICTION",
183
+ "heading_level": null,
184
+ "page_id": 1,
185
+ "polygon": [
186
+ [
187
+ 257.03999999999996,
188
+ 110.97
189
+ ],
190
+ [
191
+ 381.276,
192
+ 110.97
193
+ ],
194
+ [
195
+ 381.276,
196
+ 121.5
197
+ ],
198
+ [
199
+ 257.03999999999996,
200
+ 121.5
201
+ ]
202
+ ]
203
+ },
204
+ {
205
+ "title": "CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES (FOR DIVERSITY CASES ONLY)",
206
+ "heading_level": null,
207
+ "page_id": 1,
208
+ "polygon": [
209
+ [
210
+ 145.656,
211
+ 154.71
212
+ ],
213
+ [
214
+ 482.86800000000005,
215
+ 154.71
216
+ ],
217
+ [
218
+ 482.86800000000005,
219
+ 166.85999999999999
220
+ ],
221
+ [
222
+ 145.656,
223
+ 166.85999999999999
224
+ ]
225
+ ]
226
+ },
227
+ {
228
+ "title": "COURTHOUSE ASSIGNMENT",
229
+ "heading_level": null,
230
+ "page_id": 1,
231
+ "polygon": [
232
+ [
233
+ 253.36799999999997,
234
+ 539.46
235
+ ],
236
+ [
237
+ 381.276,
238
+ 539.46
239
+ ],
240
+ [
241
+ 381.276,
242
+ 549.99
243
+ ],
244
+ [
245
+ 253.36799999999997,
246
+ 549.99
247
+ ]
248
+ ]
249
+ }
250
+ ],
251
+ "page_stats": [
252
+ {
253
+ "page_id": 0,
254
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
255
+ "block_counts": [
256
+ [
257
+ "Span",
258
+ 483
259
+ ],
260
+ [
261
+ "Line",
262
+ 218
263
+ ],
264
+ [
265
+ "Text",
266
+ 22
267
+ ],
268
+ [
269
+ "SectionHeader",
270
+ 6
271
+ ],
272
+ [
273
+ "PageHeader",
274
+ 3
275
+ ],
276
+ [
277
+ "Table",
278
+ 1
279
+ ],
280
+ [
281
+ "PageFooter",
282
+ 1
283
+ ]
284
+ ],
285
+ "block_metadata": {
286
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
287
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
288
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
289
+ "previous_text": "",
290
+ "previous_type": "",
291
+ "previous_order": 0
292
+ }
293
+ },
294
+ {
295
+ "page_id": 1,
296
+ "text_extraction_method": "surya",
297
+ "block_counts": [
298
+ [
299
+ "Text",
300
+ 46
301
+ ],
302
+ [
303
+ "SectionHeader",
304
+ 6
305
+ ],
306
+ [
307
+ "Form",
308
+ 4
309
+ ],
310
+ [
311
+ "PageHeader",
312
+ 2
313
+ ],
314
+ [
315
+ "Table",
316
+ 2
317
+ ],
318
+ [
319
+ "PageFooter",
320
+ 2
321
+ ]
322
+ ],
323
+ "block_metadata": {
324
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
325
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
326
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
327
+ "previous_text": "",
328
+ "previous_type": "",
329
+ "previous_order": 0
330
+ }
331
+ }
332
+ ],
333
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02750841"
334
+ }
335
+ }
marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750843/EFTA02750843.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
2
+
3
+ JANE DOE,
4
+
5
+ Plaintiff
6
+
7
+ v.
8
+
9
+ DARREN .. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, in their capacities as executors of the ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN,
10
+
11
+ Defendants.
12
+
13
+ Case No. 19 Civ. 8673
14
+
15
+ ## [PROPOSED' ORDER ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED UNDER PSEUDONYM
16
+
17
+ WHEREAS Plaintiff Jane Doe ("Plaintiff') filed a Complaint in this action on September 18, 2019;
18
+
19
+ WHEREAS by Notice of Motion dated September 18, 2019, and Memorandum of Law dated September 18, 2019, Plaintiff requested that the Court permit her to proceed under a pseudonym in this action until such time as the Court may order their names disclosed;
20
+
21
+ IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Plaintiff may proceed under a pseudonym in this action until such time as the Court may order her name disclosed.
22
+
23
+ Dated: September 18, 2019
24
+
25
+ U.S.D.J.
marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750843/EFTA02750843.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750843.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 1,
15
+ "chars": 831,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 0.67,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 193.392,
27
+ 71.28
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 418.5074768066406,
31
+ 71.28
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 418.5074768066406,
35
+ 100.10302734375
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 193.392,
39
+ 100.10302734375
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "[PROPOSED' ORDER ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO \nPROCEED UNDER PSEUDONYM",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 159.732,
50
+ 328.86
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 453.4478454589844,
54
+ 328.86
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 453.4478454589844,
58
+ 358.4830322265625
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 159.732,
62
+ 358.4830322265625
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ }
66
+ ],
67
+ "page_stats": [
68
+ {
69
+ "page_id": 0,
70
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
71
+ "block_counts": [
72
+ [
73
+ "Span",
74
+ 45
75
+ ],
76
+ [
77
+ "Line",
78
+ 23
79
+ ],
80
+ [
81
+ "Text",
82
+ 11
83
+ ],
84
+ [
85
+ "SectionHeader",
86
+ 2
87
+ ],
88
+ [
89
+ "PageHeader",
90
+ 1
91
+ ],
92
+ [
93
+ "PageFooter",
94
+ 1
95
+ ]
96
+ ],
97
+ "block_metadata": {
98
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
99
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
100
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
101
+ "previous_text": "",
102
+ "previous_type": "",
103
+ "previous_order": 0
104
+ }
105
+ }
106
+ ],
107
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02750843"
108
+ }
109
+ }
marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750844/EFTA02750844.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
2
+
3
+ JANE DOE,
4
+
5
+ Plaint
6
+
7
+ v.
8
+
9
+ Case No. 19 Civ. 8673
10
+
11
+ DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, in their capacities as executors of the ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN,
12
+
13
+ Defendants.
14
+
15
+ ## NOTICE OF MOTION
16
+
17
+ PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that upon the accompanying Memorandum of Law, dated September 18, 2019, Plaintiff Jane Doe will move this Court in a courtroom to be designated at 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York, at such convenient time as counsel may be heard, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 10(a), for an Order permitting Plaintiff to proceed under a pseudonym in this action until such time as the Court may order her name disclosed, and for such other relief as the Court deems appropriate and just.
18
+
19
+ PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to Local Civil Rule 6.1(b), any answering papers shall be served within fourteen days after service of the moving papers, and any reply papers shall be served within seven days after service of the answering papers.
20
+
21
+ Dated: September 18, 2019 Respectfully submitted,
22
+
23
+ AlidA\_
24
+
25
+ Roberta A. Kaplan
26
+
27
+ Julie E. Fink
28
+
29
+ Jenna M. Dabbs
30
+
31
+ Justin Horton
32
+
33
+ Alexandra K. Conlon (admission pending)
34
+
35
+ KAPLAN HECKER & FINK LLP
36
+
37
+ 350 Fifth Avenue, Suite 7110
38
+
39
+ New York, New York 10118
40
+
41
+ Telephone: (212) 763-0883
42
+
43
+ Facsimile: (212) 564-0883
44
+
45
+ rkaplan®kaplanhecker.com
46
+
47
+ jfinIc®kaplanhecker.com
48
+
49
+ jdabbs®kaplanhecker.com
50
+
51
+ jhorton®kaplanhecker.com
52
+
53
+ aconlon@kaplanhecker.com
54
+
55
+ Attorneys for Plaintiff Jane Doe
marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750844/EFTA02750844.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,143 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750844.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 2,
15
+ "chars": 1474,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 0.91,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 192.78000000000003,
27
+ 71.28
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 418.5074768066406,
31
+ 71.28
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 418.5074768066406,
35
+ 100.10302734375
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 192.78000000000003,
39
+ 100.10302734375
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "NOTICE OF MOTION",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 242.35200000000003,
50
+ 316.71000000000004
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 369.35699462890625,
54
+ 316.71000000000004
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 369.35699462890625,
58
+ 331.4830322265625
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 242.35200000000003,
62
+ 331.4830322265625
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ }
66
+ ],
67
+ "page_stats": [
68
+ {
69
+ "page_id": 0,
70
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
71
+ "block_counts": [
72
+ [
73
+ "Span",
74
+ 43
75
+ ],
76
+ [
77
+ "Line",
78
+ 22
79
+ ],
80
+ [
81
+ "Text",
82
+ 8
83
+ ],
84
+ [
85
+ "SectionHeader",
86
+ 2
87
+ ],
88
+ [
89
+ "PageHeader",
90
+ 1
91
+ ],
92
+ [
93
+ "PageFooter",
94
+ 1
95
+ ]
96
+ ],
97
+ "block_metadata": {
98
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
99
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
100
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
101
+ "previous_text": "",
102
+ "previous_type": "",
103
+ "previous_order": 0
104
+ }
105
+ },
106
+ {
107
+ "page_id": 1,
108
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
109
+ "block_counts": [
110
+ [
111
+ "Span",
112
+ 39
113
+ ],
114
+ [
115
+ "Line",
116
+ 20
117
+ ],
118
+ [
119
+ "Text",
120
+ 19
121
+ ],
122
+ [
123
+ "PageHeader",
124
+ 1
125
+ ],
126
+ [
127
+ "PageFooter",
128
+ 1
129
+ ]
130
+ ],
131
+ "block_metadata": {
132
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
133
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
134
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
135
+ "previous_text": "",
136
+ "previous_type": "",
137
+ "previous_order": 0
138
+ }
139
+ }
140
+ ],
141
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02750844"
142
+ }
143
+ }
marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750846/EFTA02750846.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,215 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
2
+
3
+ JANE DOE,
4
+
5
+ Plaintiff
6
+
7
+ v.
8
+
9
+ Case No. 19 Civ. 8673
10
+
11
+ DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, in their capacities as executors of the ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN,
12
+
13
+ Defendants.
14
+
15
+ ## MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED UNDER PSEUDONYM
16
+
17
+ Roberta A. Kaplan
18
+
19
+ Julie E. Fink
20
+
21
+ Jenna M. Dabbs
22
+
23
+ Justin Horton
24
+
25
+ Alexandra K. Conlon (admission pending)
26
+
27
+ KAPLAN HECKER & FINK LLP
28
+
29
+ 350 Fifth Avenue, Suite 7110
30
+
31
+ New York, New York 10118
32
+
33
+ Telephone: (212) 763-0883
34
+
35
+ Facsimile: (212) 564-0883
36
+
37
+ Attorneys for Plaintiff Jane Doe
38
+
39
+ ## TABLE OF CONTENTS
40
+
41
+ | PRELIMINARY STATEMENT | |
42
+ |----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----|
43
+ | STATEMENT OF FACTS | 3 |
44
+ | ARGUMENT | 6 |
45
+ | A. The Risks to Plaintiff Favor Allowing Her to Proceed Under A Pseudonym | 8 |
46
+ | B. Public Policy and the Public Interest Favor Protecting Plaintiff's Privacy | 10 |
47
+ | C. Allowing Plaintiff to Proceed Pseudonymously Will Not Prejudice Defendant | 11 |
48
+ | D. PlaintiffJane Doe Has Diligently Worked to Keep Her Identity Confidential And | |
49
+ | There is No Alternative Mechanism For Protecting Her Confidentiality | 12 |
50
+ | CONCLUSION | 13 |
51
+
52
+ ### TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
53
+
54
+ | Doe 1 v. United States, | PAGE(S) CASES |
55
+ |-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------|
56
+ | 359 F. Supp. 3d 1201 (S.D. Fla. 2019) Doe #1 v. Syracuse Univ., | 4, 5 |
57
+ | No. 18-cv-496, 2018 WL 7079489 (N.D.N.Y. Sep. 10, 2018) Doe No. 2 v. Kolko, | 11 |
58
+ | 242 F.R.D. 193 (E.D.N.Y. 2006) Doe v. Colgate Univ., | 8, 10, 12 |
59
+ | No. 15-cv-1069, 2016 WL 1448829 (N.D.N.Y. Apr. 12, 2016) Doe v. Epstein, | 8, 9 |
60
+ | No. 08-cv-80119 (S.D. Fla. Aug. 7, 2009), ECF No. 253 Doe v. Epstein, | 1, 7 |
61
+ | No. 08-cv-80893 (S.D. Fla. Oct. 6, 2008), ECF No. 15 Doe v. Fedcap. Rehab. Services, Inc., | 1, 8 |
62
+ | No. 17-cv-8220, 2018 WL 2021588 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 27, 2018) Doe v. Greiner, | 13 |
63
+ | 662 F. Supp. 2d 355 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) Doe v. Indyke, | 8 |
64
+ | No. 19-cv-7772 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 20, 2019), ECF No.1 Doe v. Skyline Automobiles Inc., | 4 |
65
+ | 375 F. Supp. 3d 401 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) Doe v.M, | 8 |
66
+ | 105 F. Supp. 2d 40 (E.D.N.Y. 1999) Doe v. Solera Capital LLC, | 12 |
67
+ | No. 18-cv-1769, 2019 WL 1437520 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 31, 2019) Doe v. Szul Jewelry, Inc., | 9, 12 |
68
+ | No. 0604277/2007, 2008 WL 2157893 (N.Y. Cty. Sup. Ct. May 8, 2008) Does I thru XXIII v. Advanced Textile Corp., | 7 |
69
+ | 214 F.3d 1058 (9th Cir. 2000) | 9-10 |
70
+
71
+ | E.W. v. N.Y. Blood Ctr., | |
72
+ |---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|
73
+ | 213 F.R.D. 108 (E.D.N.Y. 2009) Jane Doe I et at v. Epstein et at, | I 1, 12 |
74
+ | No. 19-cv-7675 (S.D.N.Y) Jane Doe 43 v. Epstein et at, | 5 |
75
+ | No. 17-cv-616 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 5, 2017), ECF No. 28 Jane Doe No. 103 v. Epstein, | I, 7 |
76
+ | No. 10-cv-80309 (S.D. Fla. Mar. 9, 2010), ECF No. 5 | 1, 8 |
77
+ | Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, | and L.M., |
78
+ | No. 50-2009-CA-040800 (Fla. Cir. Ct. Palm Beach Cty. Dec. 7, 2009), ECF No. 5 | 4 |
79
+ | No. 19-cv-07772 (S.D.N.Y.) L.H. v. Schwanenegger, | 5 |
80
+ | No. 06-cv-2042, 2007 WL 662463 (ED. Cal. Feb. 8, 2007) | 9 |
81
+ | No. 19-cv-07773 (S.D.N.Y.) | 5 |
82
+ | No. 19-cv-07772 (S.D.N.Y.) Roe v. Wade, | 5 |
83
+ | 410 U.S. 113 (1973) Sealed Plaintiff v. Sealed Defendant, | 6 |
84
+ | 537 F.3d 185 (2d Cir. 2008) United States v. Epstein, | passim |
85
+ | No. 19-cr-490 (S.D.N.Y. July 2, 2019), ECF No. 2 United States v. Epstein, | 2 |
86
+ | No. 19-cr-490 (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 12, 2019), ECF No. 11 United States v. Epstein, | 5 |
87
+ | No. 19-cr-490 (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 12, 2019), ECF No. 53 United States v. Epstein, | 7 |
88
+ | No. 19-cr-490 (S.D.N.Y. July 18, 2019), ECF No. 32 VE v. Nine East 71st Street et at, | 5, 9 |
89
+ | No. 19-cv-7625 (S.D.N.Y.) | 5 |
90
+
91
+ # STATUTES
92
+
93
+ # RULES
94
+
95
+ Plaintiff Jane Doe ("Plaintiff'), by her undersigned attorneys, respectfully submits this memorandum of law in support of her motion for leave to proceed under a pseudonym, until such time as the Court may order her name to be disclosed.'
96
+
97
+ # PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
98
+
99
+ It can be unimaginably difficult for any person to publicly allege that they were sexually abused as a child. For Jeffrey Epstein's victims, the burden is extraordinary. Epstein's criminal sexual assault of young girls has become a public spectacle—garnering an extraordinary amount of public attention since Epstein's arrest on July 6, 2019, and his untimely death on August 10, 2019. And even before his most recent arrest, Epstein and his associates—many of whom are named in various civil complaints-used their vast resources and connections to harass and retaliate against any women who came forward to share their stories or seek help through courts.
100
+
101
+ It is therefore not surprising that countless Epstein victims kept silent for decades. For those brave women who did come forward, courts have routinely allowed them to do so pseudonymously, ensuring that they could vindicate their rights without public prying or fear of retaliation. See, e.g., Jane Doe 43 v. Epstein et al., No. 17-cv-616 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 5, 2017), ECF No. 28; Jane Doe No. 103 v. Epstein,10-cv-80309 (S.D. Fla. Mar. 9, 2010), ECF No. 5; Doe v. Epstein, No. 08-cv-80119-1CAM (S.D. Fla. Aug. 7, 2009), ECF No. 253; Doe v. Epstein, No. 08 cv-80893 (S.D. Fla. Oct. 6, 2008), ECF No. 15 at 2-3.
102
+
103
+ Plaintiff Jane Doe is one of Epstein's many victims. She kept Epstein's abuse a secret for most of her life until she recently agreed to confidentially assist the United States Attorney's
104
+
105
+ I Plaintiff understands that at some point issues may arise regarding how to proceed with discovery of her claim. At that time, counsel for Plaintiff intend to meet and confer about these issues with counsel for Defendants and will bring disputes (if any) to the Court for resolution as appropriate.
106
+
107
+ Office for the Southern District of New York in its investigation of Epstein's crimes. Plaintiff was identified as "Minor Victim-1" in the indictment in United States v. Epstein, No. 19-cr-490 (S.D.N.Y) (the "Indictment"), which details Epstein's assault of her and others beginning when she was only fourteen years old. See Indictment, United States v. Epstein, No. 19-cr-490 (S.D.N.Y. July 2, 2019), ECF No. 2. Plaintiff expects to continue to cooperate in the Government's stated ongoing investigation of Epstein's co-conspirators, see Statement of Manhattan U.S. Attorney on the Death of Defendant Jeffrey Epstein (Aug. 10, 2019), https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/statement-manhattan-us-attorney-death-defendant-jeffreyepstein (1OJur investigation of the conduct charged in the Indictment—which included a conspiracy count — remains ongoing."), and through this action seeks damages for the immense injuries she has and continues to suffer.
108
+
109
+ The potential harm to Plaintiff if her identity were made public is manifest. Litigation will expose some of the most intimate and humiliating moments of Plaintiff's life, furthering her ongoing psychological harm and injuring her family and her young child, who is unaware of the abuse Plaintiff suffered. The public scrutiny and attention paid to her would be profound and exacerbate the harm. And the risk to her of retaliation—not to mention the risk of potential interference with the Government's investigation—remains notwithstanding Epstein's death.
110
+
111
+ While in some cases the public interest or matters of fairness counsel against permitting anonymity, none of those concerns are present here. There is no public interest in revealing the identity of one of Epstein's many victims; to the contrary, allowing Plaintiff to proceed pseudonymously fosters the public interest in having victims come forward. Further, revealing Plaintiff's identity could interfere with the Government's ongoing investigation of Epstein's associates. Likewise, there is no harm to Epstein's estate in allowing her to proceed
112
+
113
+ anonymously. The Court can establish procedures by which the estate will have the information necessary to defend the case, while avoiding public harassment of Plaintiff.
114
+
115
+ Accordingly, and for all the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff Jane Doe respectfully requests that this Court permit her to proceed in this case under a pseudonym.
116
+
117
+ ## STATEMENT OF FACTS
118
+
119
+ Jeffrey Epstein was a wealthy pedophile who, with the assistance of others, committed sexual assaults on countless young girls for decades. Plaintiff Jane Doe is one of Epstein's victims. As set out in detail in her Complaint, Plaintiff met Epstein when she was only fourteen years old, and Epstein sexually assaulted and abused her for the next three years. His conduct caused her severe emotional and economic injuries, including post-traumatic stress disorder, which she still suffers today.
120
+
121
+ Epstein, by contrast, spent most of his life engaging in criminal sexual assault of minors like Plaintiff, with near-total impunity. Using his wealth and connections, and with the assistance of his co-conspirators and associates, Epstein avoided meaningful prosecution for his crimes until July 2019. He largely did so by harassing his victims and the lawyers who attempted to hold him accountable. According to Alexander Acosta, the former United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, after the FBI opened its first investigation into Epstein in 2006, Epstein's associates, whom Acosta described as "an army," ran "a year-long assault on the prosecution and the prosecutors" that included "investigat[ing] individual prosecutors and their families." See & Lee Aitken, Jeffrey Epstein: How the Hedge Fund Mogul Pedophile Got Off Easy, DAILY BEAST (Mar. 25, 2011), https://www.thedailybeast.com/jeffrey-epstein-how-the-hedge-fund-mogul-pedophile-got-off-
122
+
123
+ easy (reprinting letter Acosta "released exclusively to The Daily Beast").2 Epstein likewise attacked his victims' lawyers. In 2009, he brought a frivolous lawsuit against a lawyer for several victims. See Complaint, Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein, and L.M., No. 50-2009-CA-040800 (Fla. Cir. Ct. Palm Beach Cty. Dec. 7, 2009), ECF No. 5. Epstein later "admitted to wrongfully suing" and stated through counsel that "[t]he lawsuit that I filed was my unreasonable attempt to damage [Mr. I business reputation and stop M from pursuing cases against me." Patricia Mazzei, Jeffrey Epstein Settles Lawsuit, Avoiding Testimony From Accusers in Sex Case, NY TIMES (Dec. 4, 2018), https://nyti.ms/2zKIGro.
124
+
125
+ On July 6, 2019, Epstein was arrested after landing in his private jet at Teterboro Airport in New Jersey. On July 8, 2019, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York unsealed an indictment charging Epstein with federal sex-trafficking crimes. Plaintiff features prominently in the Indictment, identified as "Minor Victim-1." See Indictment at 9. Plaintiff steadfastly maintained the confidentiality of her participation in the criminal investigation because of her very reasonable fear of the harms that would result if her identity were made public.
126
+
127
+ Before Epstein's untimely death, Judge Richard Berman, hearing the criminal case, recognized the risks to victims posed by Epstein and his associates. In support of Epstein's pre-
128
+
129
+ <sup>2</sup> The result, as we now know, was that despite the fact that federal prosecutors had already "drafted an 82-page prosecution memorandum and a 53-page indictment outlining numerous federal sexual offenses committed by Epstein,"Doe I v. United States, 359 F. Supp. 3d 1201, 1205 (S.D. Ha. 2019), the United States Attorney offered Epstein "a remarkable deal," that allowed him to sign a non-prosecution agreement that was unlawfully hidden from Epstein's victims, see Julie K. Perversion ofJustice: Undermining the Case, MIAMI HERALD (Nov. 28, 2018), https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/article214210674.html (describing how "despite ample physical evidence and multiple witnesses corroborating the girls' stories, federal prosecutors and Epstein's lawyers quietly put together a remarkable deal for Epstein"); see also Doe I, 359 F. Supp. 3d at 1221 (finding violation of the Crime Victim Rights Act). Epstein was able to plead to lesser offenses and serve a lenient sentence that allowed him to spend most of his waking hours outside of jail, where he allegedly continued to sexually assault young girls. See, e.g., Complaint, Doe v. lndyke, No. 19-cv-7772 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 20, 2019), ECF No. 1 at 19-20.
130
+
131
+ trial detention, the Government had cited "extensive allegations of obstruction and tampering in connection with civil lawsuits brought against [Epstein]," and a 2006 Palm Beach police report describing how "the parent of one of [Epstein's] victims was driven off the road by a private investigator." Gov't Letter in Further Supp. of Detention Mem., United States v. Epstein, No. 19-cr-490 (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 12, 2019), ECF No. II at 11; see also id., ECF No. 11-2 (redacted copy of 2006 Palm Beach police report)? In his decision remanding Epstein to pre-trial detention, Judge Berman relied on this evidence and discussed at length how "Mr. Epstein or his representatives have intimidated, threatened, and/or made payments to potential witnesses." Decision and Order Remanding Def., id., (July 18, 2019), ECF No. 32 at 15, 15-18.
132
+
133
+ On August 11, 2019, Epstein died by suicide at the Metropolitan Correctional Facility. See Statement of Manhattan U.S. Attorney on the Death of Defendant Jeffrey Epstein (Aug. 10, 2019), https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pestatement-manhattan-us-attorney-death-defendantjeffrey-epstein. Following his death, media attention to Epstein and his associates went into overdrive. Numerous other victims have now filed suit—many using a pseudonym to protect their identity. See Lisa Doe v. Darren K Indyke and Richard D. Kahn et at, No. 19-cv-07773 (S.D.N.Y.); Priscilla Doe v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn et at, No. 19-cv-07772 (S.D.N.Y.); Katlyn Doe v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn et at, No. I9-cv-07771 (S.D.N.Y.); VE v. Nine East 71' Street et at, No. 19-cv-7625 (S.D.N.Y.); Jane Doe I et at v. Epstein et at, No. 19-cv-07675 (S.D.N.Y). And the Government has publicly stated its intention
134
+
135
+ I The same police report documented "further information regarding victim and witness threats and intimidation reported against an individual who was directly in contact with an assistant of [Epstein], followed `immediately' by a call to that same individual from a phone number associated with [Epstein's] businesses and acsfulates." Id. ECF No. II at II. A second Palm Beach police report, also attached in Ml to the Government's pretrial detention memorandum, stated that "one victim reported that 'she was personally contacted through a source that has maintained contact with Epstein,' who 'assured [the victim] that she would receive monetary compensation for her assistance in not cooperating with law enforcement.' Indeed, the victim reported having been told: 'Those who help him will be compensated and those who hurt him will be dealt with.— Id.; see also id., ECF No. 11-3 (second Palm Beach police report).
136
+
137
+ to continue investigating Epstein's associates, many of whom have reportedly retained criminal defense lawyers and/or have been named as co-defendants in separate lawsuits.
138
+
139
+ ## ARGUMENT
140
+
141
+ While Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 10(a) provides that the "title of the complaint must name all the parties," courts have long understood this instruction as compatible with their discretion to permit a party with special privacy concerns to proceed under a pseudonym. See generally, e.g., Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973). In deciding whether a plaintiff may be allowed to maintain an action under a pseudonym, courts balance the plaintiff's interest in anonymity against the public interest in disclosure and any prejudice to the defendant. Sealed Plaintiff v. Sealed Defendant, 537 F.3d 185, 189 (2d Cir. 2008). This is a "factor-driven balancing inquiry [that] requires a district court to exercise its discretion in the course of weighing competing interests." Id. at 190.
142
+
143
+ The Second Circuit has set forth a list of ten non-exhaustive factors that courts may consider in determining whether to permit a plaintiff to proceed pseudonymously:
144
+
145
+ - (1) whether the litigation involves matters that are highly sensitive and of a personal nature;
146
+ - (2) whether identification poses a risk of retaliatory physical or mental harm to the party seeking to proceed anonymously or even more critically, to innocent non-parties;
147
+ - (3) whether identification presents other harms and the likely severity of those harms, including whether the injury litigated against would be incurred as a result of the disclosure of the plaintiff's identity;
148
+ - (4) whether the plaintiff is particularly vulnerable to the possible harms of disclosure, particularly in light of the plaintiff's age;
149
+ - (5) whether the suit is challenging the actions of the government or that of private parties;
150
+
151
+ (6) whether the defendant is prejudiced by allowing the plaintiff to press his claims anonymously, whether the nature of that prejudice (if any) differs at any particular stage of the litigation, and whether any prejudice can be mitigated by the district court;
152
+
153
+ (7) whether the plaintiff's identity has thus far been kept confidential;
154
+
155
+ (8) whether the public's interest in the litigation is furthered by requiring the plaintiff to disclose his identity;
156
+
157
+ (9) whether, because of the purely legal nature of the issues presented or otherwise, there is an atypically weak public interest in knowing the litigants' identities; and
158
+
159
+ (10) whether there are any alternative mechanisms for protecting the confidentiality of the plaintiff.
160
+
161
+ Id. (internal quotation marks, citations, brackets, and ellipses omitted); see also Doe v. Szul Jewelry, Inc., No. 0604277/2007, 2008 WL 2157893, at \*5-6 (N.Y. Cty. Sup. Ct. May 8, 2008) (applying substantially identical test under New York state law). Courts are "not required to list each of the factors or use any particular formulation as long as it is clear that the court balanced the interests at stake in reaching its conclusion." Sealed Plaint(lf, 537 F.3d at 191 n.4.
162
+
163
+ Here, all of the relevant factors strongly weigh in favor of granting Plaintiff's motion to file this case using a pseudonym. Indeed, for similar reasons to those discussed below, numerous courts have permitted Epstein's victims to proceed under pseudonyms in prior cases. See Order, Doe v. Epstein, No. 08-cv-80119 (S.D. Fla. Aug. 7, 2009), ECF No. 253 (consolidating 11 Doe cases against Epstein and every plaintiff to proceed anonymously in the style of the case); see also Hr'g Tr., United States v. Epstein, No. 19-cr-490 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 27, 2019), ECF No. 53 (allowing eight of Epstein's victims to present testimony under protective pseudonyms after Epstein's death in connection with criminal case); Joint Rule 26(0 Report, Jane Doe 43 v. Epstein et aL, No. 17-cv-616 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 5, 2017), ECF No. 28 at 4 (Rule 26 Report noting
164
+
165
+ that "[d]ue to the nature of the claim, the Plaintiff has proceeded anonymously through a pseudonym"); Order, Jane Doe No. 103 v. Epstein, No. 10-cv-80309 (S.D. Fla. Mar. 9, 2010), ECF No. 5 (granting motion to proceed anonymously). These courts have recognized that, throughout their litigation again Epstein, these women "will be required to disclose highly sensitive and intimate information," and disclosure of their real names "will cause ... much additional embarrassment, humiliation, and psychological trauma," as well as "adverse professional and economic consequences." See Order, Doe v. Epstein, No. 08-cv-80893 (S.D. Fla. Oct. 6, 2008), ECF No. 15 at 2-3.
166
+
167
+ Like her fellow victims, Plaintiff Jane Doe should be permitted to proceed pseudonymously here.
168
+
169
+ # A. The Risks to Plaintiff Favor Allowing Her to Proceed Under A Pseudonym
170
+
171
+ The first four factors set out by the Second Circuit in Sealed Plaintiff concern the plaintiff's privacy and the potential harm to the plaintiff if her identity is disclosed. See 537 F.3d at 190. Each of these factors counsels strongly in favor of allowing Plaintiff to proceed pseudonymously.
172
+
173
+ Sexual assault claims are inherently "highly sensitive and of a personal nature." See id. Accordingly, courts have recognized that "sexual assault victims are a paradigmatic example of those entitled to a grant of anonymity." Doe No. 2 v. Kolko, 242 F.R.D. 193, 195 (E.D.N.Y. 2006); see also Doe v. Skyline Automobiles Inc., 375 F. Supp. 3d 401, 405 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) (finding allegations of sexual assault and ongoing sexual harassment were "highly sensitive and of an extremely personal nature"); Doe v. Colgate Univ., No. 15-cv-1069, 2016 WL 1448829, at \*3 (N.D.N.Y. Apr. 12, 2016); Doe v. Greiner, 662 F. Supp. 2d 355, 363 n.8 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) (noting that "the identity of a minor who was the victim of a sex assault" is among the
174
+
175
+ "exceptional circumstances" justifying anonymity in court materials). For that reason alone, permitting Plaintiff to proceed pseudonymously is warranted.
176
+
177
+ All of these potential harms are compounded in this case due to the great deal of public attention surrounding Epstein's arrest and untimely death. See John Allsop, After Jeffrey Epstein's Death, Conspiracies—and Journalism—Flourish, COLUM. JOURNALISM REV.: THE MEDIA TODAY (Aug. 12, 2019), https://www.cjr.org/the\_media\_today/jeffrey\_epstein\_suicide\_ conspiracies.php; see also Doe v. Colgate Univ., 2016 WL 1448829, at •2 (recognizing that "significant media attention" poses "the risk of further reputational harm" to plaintiffs). The public identification of Jane Doe would undoubtedly lead to media scrutiny. That attention would not only exacerbate Plaintiff's psychological injury but also is likely to lead to harassment and cause further harm to her family and friends. Plaintiff has a legitimate fear that her public identification could put her job, relationships, and well-being at risk.
178
+
179
+ In this case, identifying Plaintiff also "poses a risk of retaliatory physical or mental harm." Sealed Plaintiff, 537 F.3d at 190. Although Epstein is deceased, a number of his associates are the subjects of potential criminal investigation and civil lawsuits. Many of these same individuals have already proven that they will intimidate and attempt to silence any of his identifiable victims. See Decision and Order Remanding Def., United States v. Epstein, No. 19 cr490 (S.D.N.Y. July 18, 2019), ECF No. 32 at 15, 15-18. This well-established history of retaliation justifies permitting Plaintiff to proceed pseudonymously. See, e.g., Doe v. Sclera Capital LLC, No. 18-cv-1769, 2019 WL 1437520, at \*5 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 31, 2019) ("[C]ourts have allowed plaintiffs to proceed anonymously where disclosure of their identities created a risk of harm from third parties unaffiliated with the case."); L.H. v. Schwarzenegger, No. 06-cv-2042, 2007 WL 662463, at \*16 (ED. Cal. Feb. 8, 2007); see also Does I thru XXIII v. Advanced
180
+
181
+ Textile Corp., 214 F.3d 1058, 1070 (9th Cir. 2000) (noting that plaintiffs may proceed anonymously "to protect themselves from retaliation by third parties").
182
+
183
+ ## B. Public Policy and the Public Interest Favor Protecting Plaintiff's Privacy
184
+
185
+ Under Sealed Plaintiff, courts balance the plaintiff's interest in privacy with the public's countervailing interest in the litigation. 537 F.3d at 190.
186
+
187
+ Here, there simply is no public interest served by revealing the identity of one of Epstein's many victims. To the contrary, the public interest would be best served by permitting Plaintiff to seek justice under a protective pseudonym. New York State has a strong public policy interest in protecting the privacy interests of victims of sexual abuse, as demonstrated by Section 50-b of the Civil Rights Law, which protects sex-abuse survivors from undesired identification in a range of public administrative contexts, including certain court proceedings. See N.Y. Civil Rights Law § 50-b (McKinney 2019) (shielding sex-abuse victims from identification in, among other things, any "police report, court file, or other document"). Moreover, in addition to the public's general interest in protecting the well-being of victims, "the public generally has a strong interest in protecting the identities of sexual assault victims so that other victims will not be deterred from reporting such crimes." See Kolko, 242 F.R.D. at 195-96. In consideration of that strong public policy, federal courts have permitted victims of sexual assault to proceed anonymously in similar cases.
188
+
189
+ Allowing Plaintiff to proceed pseudonymously would also avoid unnecessary interference with the federal government's ongoing criminal investigation into Epstein's network. This Court's decision to permit Plaintiff to proceed under a protective pseudonym would thus not only protect her privacy and security but advance an important public interest in facilitating the orderly administration of criminal justice.
190
+
191
+ ### C. Allowing Plaintiff to Proceed Pseudonymously Will Not Prejudice Defendant
192
+
193
+ In considering whether to permit a plaintiff to proceed anonymously, courts also balance the harm to the plaintiff with the potential prejudice to the defendant. See Sealed Plaintiff; 537 F.3d at 189. The relevant considerations are the damage to the defendant's reputation caused by responding to anonymous allegations, difficulties in conducting discovery, and the fundamental fairness of proceeding in such a manner. E.W. v. N.Y. Blood Ctr., 213 F.R.D. 108, 112 (E.D.N.Y. 2009). None of these factors counsels against allowing Plaintiff to proceed pseudonymously here.
194
+
195
+ As an initial matter, Epstein's reputation as a perpetrator of child sexual abuse is well established. He was a registered sex offender in New York as of 2010, see Romero and Nicholas Kulish, Jeffrey Epstein Registered as a Sex Offender in 1 States. In New Mexico, He Didn't Have To., N.Y. TIMES (July II, 2019), https://nyti.ms/2NS8D1Q, and the details of his crimes have been widely publicized. Indeed, rather than avoid this publicity during his lifetime, Epstein essentially admitted that he had committed the same type of conduct underlying Plaintiff's complaint. See James Stewart, The Day Jeffrey Epstein Told Me He Had Din on Powerful People, N.Y. TIMES (Aug. 12, 2019), https://nyti.ms/2OSpIcF (describing how Epstein told reporter that "criminalizing sex with teenage girls was a cultural aberration and that at times in history it was perfectly acceptable"). This case, more than any, is one in which "any reputational harm to defendants has already been inflicted." Doe #1 v. Syracuse Univ., No. 18 cv-496, 2018 WL 7079489, att8 (N.D.N.Y. Sep. 10, 2018).
196
+
197
+ Permitting Plaintiff to proceed under a protective pseudonym also will not inhibit Epstein's estate from conducting discovery and reasonably defending this case. Plaintiff's counsel expects to make reasonable accommodations to facilitate the fair and orderly resolution of this case, including providing Plaintiff's name to Defendant's counsel under conditions that will reasonably protect the safety of Plaintiff, her family, and potential witnesses. Where a defendant's counsel is made aware of plaintiff's identity, there is no "prejudice to [defendant's] ability to conduct discovery or try the matter if plaintiff were to proceed under a pseudonym." See E. W, 213 F.R.D. at 112; see also Kolko, 242 F.R.D. at 198 (finding that where defendants know plaintiff's identity, "defendants will not be hampered or inconvenienced merely by plaintiff's anonymity in court papers"). As in other cases in which courts have permitted plaintiffs to proceed under a protective pseudonym, the requested order "may not and will not hinder defendant's ability to pursue his legal defense in any way." Doe v.M, 105 F. Supp. 2d 40, 45 (E.D.N.Y. 1999) (no prejudice to defendant where plaintiff's anonymity did not interfere with ability to take depositions, obtain documents, or limit defendant's trial rights or public's access rights).
198
+
199
+ ## D. Plaintiff Jane Doe Has Diligently Worked to Keep Her Identity Confidential And There is No Alternative Mechanism For Protecting Her Confidentiality
200
+
201
+ Importantly, Plaintiff has worked diligently to safeguard her identity. She has never spoken to the press or publicly identified herself in any way associated with her allegations. In the related criminal case, federal prosecutors have carefully protected her identity. These efforts underscore the strength of her petition to proceed pseudonymously in her civil action. See, e.g., Solera Capital, 2019 WL 1437520, at •7 (finding that "the fact that Doe's anonymity to the public has been preserved to date counsels in favor of proceeding pseudonymously). This is not a case where Plaintiff has sought some perceived advantage by broadcasting her identity in public while attempting to shield it in court. Cf. Doe v. Fedcap. Rehab. Services, Inc., No. 17 cv-8220, 2018 WL 2021588, at •2 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 27, 2018) (vacating grant of pseudonymity after plaintiff voluntarily participated in major news story using their real name).
202
+
203
+ Moreover, allowing Plaintiff to proceed pseudonymously here is the only mechanism available to continue to protect her identity. See Sealed Plaintiff 537 F.3d at 190. Given the certain prospect of intensive media scrutiny of this case, anything less than full protection of Plaintiff's name will subject her to immediate and irreversible identification and all of its negative consequences described above.
204
+
205
+ #### CONCLUSION
206
+
207
+ For all the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court grant Plaintiff's motion and allow her to file her complaint using a pseudonym.
208
+
209
+ Dated: September 18, 2019 Respectfully submitted,
210
+
211
+ Roberta A. Kaplan Julie E. Fink Jenna M. Dabbs Justin Horton Alexandra K. Conlon (admission pending)
212
+
213
+ KAPLAN HECKER & FINK LLP 350 Fifth Avenue, Suite 7110 New York, New York 10118 Telephone: (212) 763-0883 Facsimile: (212) 564-0883 rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com jfmk@kaplanhecker.com jdabbs@kaplanhecker.com jhorton@kaplanhecker.com aconlon@kaplanhecker.com
214
+
215
+ Attorneys for Plaintf f f Jane Doe
marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750846/EFTA02750846.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,1027 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750846.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 18,
15
+ "chars": 31886,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 2.55,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 192.78000000000003,
27
+ 71.28
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 418.5074768066406,
31
+ 71.28
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 418.5074768066406,
35
+ 100.10302734375
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 192.78000000000003,
39
+ 100.10302734375
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION \nFOR LEAVE TO PROCEED UNDER PSEUDONYM",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 116.28,
50
+ 320.76
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 495.73699951171875,
54
+ 320.76
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 495.73699951171875,
58
+ 350.2330322265625
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 116.28,
62
+ 350.2330322265625
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ },
66
+ {
67
+ "title": "TABLE OF CONTENTS",
68
+ "heading_level": null,
69
+ "page_id": 1,
70
+ "polygon": [
71
+ [
72
+ 238.68,
73
+ 71.28
74
+ ],
75
+ [
76
+ 374.138671875,
77
+ 71.28
78
+ ],
79
+ [
80
+ 374.138671875,
81
+ 86.103515625
82
+ ],
83
+ [
84
+ 238.68,
85
+ 86.103515625
86
+ ]
87
+ ]
88
+ },
89
+ {
90
+ "title": "TABLE OF AUTHORITIES",
91
+ "heading_level": null,
92
+ "page_id": 2,
93
+ "polygon": [
94
+ [
95
+ 229.5,
96
+ 72.08999999999999
97
+ ],
98
+ [
99
+ 383.5578918457031,
100
+ 72.08999999999999
101
+ ],
102
+ [
103
+ 383.5578918457031,
104
+ 86.60302734375
105
+ ],
106
+ [
107
+ 229.5,
108
+ 86.60302734375
109
+ ]
110
+ ]
111
+ },
112
+ {
113
+ "title": "STATUTES",
114
+ "heading_level": null,
115
+ "page_id": 4,
116
+ "polygon": [
117
+ [
118
+ 270.504,
119
+ 71.28
120
+ ],
121
+ [
122
+ 341.156982421875,
123
+ 71.28
124
+ ],
125
+ [
126
+ 341.156982421875,
127
+ 86.9830322265625
128
+ ],
129
+ [
130
+ 270.504,
131
+ 86.9830322265625
132
+ ]
133
+ ]
134
+ },
135
+ {
136
+ "title": "RULES",
137
+ "heading_level": null,
138
+ "page_id": 4,
139
+ "polygon": [
140
+ [
141
+ 282.13200000000006,
142
+ 122.30999999999999
143
+ ],
144
+ [
145
+ 329.9642639160156,
146
+ 122.30999999999999
147
+ ],
148
+ [
149
+ 329.9642639160156,
150
+ 137.9830322265625
151
+ ],
152
+ [
153
+ 282.13200000000006,
154
+ 137.9830322265625
155
+ ]
156
+ ]
157
+ },
158
+ {
159
+ "title": "PRELIMINARY STATEMENT",
160
+ "heading_level": null,
161
+ "page_id": 5,
162
+ "polygon": [
163
+ [
164
+ 219.70799999999997,
165
+ 153.89999999999998
166
+ ],
167
+ [
168
+ 391.8983154296875,
169
+ 153.89999999999998
170
+ ],
171
+ [
172
+ 391.8983154296875,
173
+ 169.10302734375
174
+ ],
175
+ [
176
+ 219.70799999999997,
177
+ 169.10302734375
178
+ ]
179
+ ]
180
+ },
181
+ {
182
+ "title": "STATEMENT OF FACTS",
183
+ "heading_level": null,
184
+ "page_id": 7,
185
+ "polygon": [
186
+ [
187
+ 234.39600000000002,
188
+ 181.44
189
+ ],
190
+ [
191
+ 378.304931640625,
192
+ 181.44
193
+ ],
194
+ [
195
+ 378.304931640625,
196
+ 196.4830322265625
197
+ ],
198
+ [
199
+ 234.39600000000002,
200
+ 196.4830322265625
201
+ ]
202
+ ]
203
+ },
204
+ {
205
+ "title": "ARGUMENT",
206
+ "heading_level": null,
207
+ "page_id": 10,
208
+ "polygon": [
209
+ [
210
+ 267.44399999999996,
211
+ 126.35999999999999
212
+ ],
213
+ [
214
+ 344.936767578125,
215
+ 126.35999999999999
216
+ ],
217
+ [
218
+ 344.936767578125,
219
+ 141.06353759765625
220
+ ],
221
+ [
222
+ 267.44399999999996,
223
+ 141.06353759765625
224
+ ]
225
+ ]
226
+ },
227
+ {
228
+ "title": "A. The Risks to Plaintiff Favor Allowing Her to Proceed Under A Pseudonym",
229
+ "heading_level": null,
230
+ "page_id": 12,
231
+ "polygon": [
232
+ [
233
+ 105.26399999999998,
234
+ 346.68
235
+ ],
236
+ [
237
+ 528.7234497070312,
238
+ 346.68
239
+ ],
240
+ [
241
+ 528.7234497070312,
242
+ 362.2330322265625
243
+ ],
244
+ [
245
+ 105.26399999999998,
246
+ 362.2330322265625
247
+ ]
248
+ ]
249
+ },
250
+ {
251
+ "title": "B. Public Policy and the Public Interest Favor Protecting Plaintiff's Privacy",
252
+ "heading_level": null,
253
+ "page_id": 14,
254
+ "polygon": [
255
+ [
256
+ 105.26399999999998,
257
+ 126.35999999999999
258
+ ],
259
+ [
260
+ 519.8804321289062,
261
+ 126.35999999999999
262
+ ],
263
+ [
264
+ 519.8804321289062,
265
+ 141.363037109375
266
+ ],
267
+ [
268
+ 105.26399999999998,
269
+ 141.363037109375
270
+ ]
271
+ ]
272
+ },
273
+ {
274
+ "title": "C. Allowing Plaintiff to Proceed Pseudonymously Will Not Prejudice Defendant",
275
+ "heading_level": null,
276
+ "page_id": 15,
277
+ "polygon": [
278
+ [
279
+ 105.26399999999998,
280
+ 72.08999999999999
281
+ ],
282
+ [
283
+ 539.784,
284
+ 72.08999999999999
285
+ ],
286
+ [
287
+ 539.784,
288
+ 86.60302734375
289
+ ],
290
+ [
291
+ 105.26399999999998,
292
+ 86.60302734375
293
+ ]
294
+ ]
295
+ },
296
+ {
297
+ "title": "D. Plaintiff Jane Doe Has Diligently Worked to Keep Her Identity Confidential \nAnd There is No Alternative Mechanism For Protecting Her Confidentiality",
298
+ "heading_level": null,
299
+ "page_id": 16,
300
+ "polygon": [
301
+ [
302
+ 104.652,
303
+ 401.76
304
+ ],
305
+ [
306
+ 536.3435668945312,
307
+ 401.76
308
+ ],
309
+ [
310
+ 536.3435668945312,
311
+ 431.2330322265625
312
+ ],
313
+ [
314
+ 104.652,
315
+ 431.2330322265625
316
+ ]
317
+ ]
318
+ },
319
+ {
320
+ "title": "CONCLUSION",
321
+ "heading_level": null,
322
+ "page_id": 17,
323
+ "polygon": [
324
+ [
325
+ 262.548,
326
+ 209.79000000000002
327
+ ],
328
+ [
329
+ 350.8900146484375,
330
+ 209.79000000000002
331
+ ],
332
+ [
333
+ 350.8900146484375,
334
+ 223.93353271484375
335
+ ],
336
+ [
337
+ 262.548,
338
+ 223.93353271484375
339
+ ]
340
+ ]
341
+ }
342
+ ],
343
+ "page_stats": [
344
+ {
345
+ "page_id": 0,
346
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
347
+ "block_counts": [
348
+ [
349
+ "Span",
350
+ 49
351
+ ],
352
+ [
353
+ "Line",
354
+ 25
355
+ ],
356
+ [
357
+ "Text",
358
+ 17
359
+ ],
360
+ [
361
+ "SectionHeader",
362
+ 2
363
+ ],
364
+ [
365
+ "PageHeader",
366
+ 1
367
+ ],
368
+ [
369
+ "PageFooter",
370
+ 1
371
+ ]
372
+ ],
373
+ "block_metadata": {
374
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
375
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
376
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
377
+ "previous_text": "",
378
+ "previous_type": "",
379
+ "previous_order": 0
380
+ }
381
+ },
382
+ {
383
+ "page_id": 1,
384
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
385
+ "block_counts": [
386
+ [
387
+ "Span",
388
+ 25
389
+ ],
390
+ [
391
+ "Line",
392
+ 12
393
+ ],
394
+ [
395
+ "PageFooter",
396
+ 2
397
+ ],
398
+ [
399
+ "PageHeader",
400
+ 1
401
+ ],
402
+ [
403
+ "SectionHeader",
404
+ 1
405
+ ],
406
+ [
407
+ "TableOfContents",
408
+ 1
409
+ ]
410
+ ],
411
+ "block_metadata": {
412
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
413
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
414
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
415
+ "previous_text": "",
416
+ "previous_type": "",
417
+ "previous_order": 0
418
+ }
419
+ },
420
+ {
421
+ "page_id": 2,
422
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
423
+ "block_counts": [
424
+ [
425
+ "Span",
426
+ 68
427
+ ],
428
+ [
429
+ "Line",
430
+ 34
431
+ ],
432
+ [
433
+ "PageFooter",
434
+ 2
435
+ ],
436
+ [
437
+ "PageHeader",
438
+ 1
439
+ ],
440
+ [
441
+ "SectionHeader",
442
+ 1
443
+ ],
444
+ [
445
+ "TableOfContents",
446
+ 1
447
+ ]
448
+ ],
449
+ "block_metadata": {
450
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
451
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
452
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
453
+ "previous_text": "",
454
+ "previous_type": "",
455
+ "previous_order": 0
456
+ }
457
+ },
458
+ {
459
+ "page_id": 3,
460
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
461
+ "block_counts": [
462
+ [
463
+ "Span",
464
+ 75
465
+ ],
466
+ [
467
+ "Line",
468
+ 35
469
+ ],
470
+ [
471
+ "PageFooter",
472
+ 2
473
+ ],
474
+ [
475
+ "PageHeader",
476
+ 1
477
+ ],
478
+ [
479
+ "TableOfContents",
480
+ 1
481
+ ]
482
+ ],
483
+ "block_metadata": {
484
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
485
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
486
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
487
+ "previous_text": "",
488
+ "previous_type": "",
489
+ "previous_order": 0
490
+ }
491
+ },
492
+ {
493
+ "page_id": 4,
494
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
495
+ "block_counts": [
496
+ [
497
+ "Span",
498
+ 14
499
+ ],
500
+ [
501
+ "Line",
502
+ 7
503
+ ],
504
+ [
505
+ "SectionHeader",
506
+ 2
507
+ ],
508
+ [
509
+ "TableOfContents",
510
+ 2
511
+ ],
512
+ [
513
+ "PageFooter",
514
+ 2
515
+ ],
516
+ [
517
+ "PageHeader",
518
+ 1
519
+ ]
520
+ ],
521
+ "block_metadata": {
522
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
523
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
524
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
525
+ "previous_text": "",
526
+ "previous_type": "",
527
+ "previous_order": 0
528
+ }
529
+ },
530
+ {
531
+ "page_id": 5,
532
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
533
+ "block_counts": [
534
+ [
535
+ "Span",
536
+ 53
537
+ ],
538
+ [
539
+ "Line",
540
+ 27
541
+ ],
542
+ [
543
+ "Text",
544
+ 4
545
+ ],
546
+ [
547
+ "PageFooter",
548
+ 2
549
+ ],
550
+ [
551
+ "PageHeader",
552
+ 1
553
+ ],
554
+ [
555
+ "SectionHeader",
556
+ 1
557
+ ],
558
+ [
559
+ "Footnote",
560
+ 1
561
+ ]
562
+ ],
563
+ "block_metadata": {
564
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
565
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
566
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
567
+ "previous_text": "",
568
+ "previous_type": "",
569
+ "previous_order": 0
570
+ }
571
+ },
572
+ {
573
+ "page_id": 6,
574
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
575
+ "block_counts": [
576
+ [
577
+ "Span",
578
+ 58
579
+ ],
580
+ [
581
+ "Line",
582
+ 26
583
+ ],
584
+ [
585
+ "Text",
586
+ 3
587
+ ],
588
+ [
589
+ "PageFooter",
590
+ 2
591
+ ],
592
+ [
593
+ "PageHeader",
594
+ 1
595
+ ]
596
+ ],
597
+ "block_metadata": {
598
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
599
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
600
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
601
+ "previous_text": "",
602
+ "previous_type": "",
603
+ "previous_order": 0
604
+ }
605
+ },
606
+ {
607
+ "page_id": 7,
608
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
609
+ "block_counts": [
610
+ [
611
+ "Span",
612
+ 50
613
+ ],
614
+ [
615
+ "Line",
616
+ 25
617
+ ],
618
+ [
619
+ "Text",
620
+ 4
621
+ ],
622
+ [
623
+ "PageFooter",
624
+ 2
625
+ ],
626
+ [
627
+ "PageHeader",
628
+ 1
629
+ ],
630
+ [
631
+ "SectionHeader",
632
+ 1
633
+ ]
634
+ ],
635
+ "block_metadata": {
636
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
637
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
638
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
639
+ "previous_text": "",
640
+ "previous_type": "",
641
+ "previous_order": 0
642
+ }
643
+ },
644
+ {
645
+ "page_id": 8,
646
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
647
+ "block_counts": [
648
+ [
649
+ "Span",
650
+ 68
651
+ ],
652
+ [
653
+ "Line",
654
+ 32
655
+ ],
656
+ [
657
+ "Text",
658
+ 3
659
+ ],
660
+ [
661
+ "PageFooter",
662
+ 2
663
+ ],
664
+ [
665
+ "PageHeader",
666
+ 1
667
+ ],
668
+ [
669
+ "Footnote",
670
+ 1
671
+ ]
672
+ ],
673
+ "block_metadata": {
674
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
675
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
676
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
677
+ "previous_text": "",
678
+ "previous_type": "",
679
+ "previous_order": 0
680
+ }
681
+ },
682
+ {
683
+ "page_id": 9,
684
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
685
+ "block_counts": [
686
+ [
687
+ "Span",
688
+ 62
689
+ ],
690
+ [
691
+ "Line",
692
+ 31
693
+ ],
694
+ [
695
+ "Text",
696
+ 2
697
+ ],
698
+ [
699
+ "PageFooter",
700
+ 2
701
+ ],
702
+ [
703
+ "PageHeader",
704
+ 1
705
+ ],
706
+ [
707
+ "Footnote",
708
+ 1
709
+ ]
710
+ ],
711
+ "block_metadata": {
712
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
713
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
714
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
715
+ "previous_text": "",
716
+ "previous_type": "",
717
+ "previous_order": 0
718
+ }
719
+ },
720
+ {
721
+ "page_id": 10,
722
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
723
+ "block_counts": [
724
+ [
725
+ "Span",
726
+ 59
727
+ ],
728
+ [
729
+ "Line",
730
+ 30
731
+ ],
732
+ [
733
+ "ListItem",
734
+ 5
735
+ ],
736
+ [
737
+ "Text",
738
+ 3
739
+ ],
740
+ [
741
+ "PageFooter",
742
+ 2
743
+ ],
744
+ [
745
+ "PageHeader",
746
+ 1
747
+ ],
748
+ [
749
+ "SectionHeader",
750
+ 1
751
+ ],
752
+ [
753
+ "ListGroup",
754
+ 1
755
+ ]
756
+ ],
757
+ "block_metadata": {
758
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
759
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
760
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
761
+ "previous_text": "",
762
+ "previous_type": "",
763
+ "previous_order": 0
764
+ }
765
+ },
766
+ {
767
+ "page_id": 11,
768
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
769
+ "block_counts": [
770
+ [
771
+ "Span",
772
+ 74
773
+ ],
774
+ [
775
+ "Line",
776
+ 30
777
+ ],
778
+ [
779
+ "Text",
780
+ 7
781
+ ],
782
+ [
783
+ "PageFooter",
784
+ 2
785
+ ],
786
+ [
787
+ "PageHeader",
788
+ 1
789
+ ]
790
+ ],
791
+ "block_metadata": {
792
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
793
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
794
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
795
+ "previous_text": "",
796
+ "previous_type": "",
797
+ "previous_order": 0
798
+ }
799
+ },
800
+ {
801
+ "page_id": 12,
802
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
803
+ "block_counts": [
804
+ [
805
+ "Span",
806
+ 70
807
+ ],
808
+ [
809
+ "Line",
810
+ 26
811
+ ],
812
+ [
813
+ "Text",
814
+ 4
815
+ ],
816
+ [
817
+ "PageFooter",
818
+ 2
819
+ ],
820
+ [
821
+ "PageHeader",
822
+ 1
823
+ ],
824
+ [
825
+ "SectionHeader",
826
+ 1
827
+ ]
828
+ ],
829
+ "block_metadata": {
830
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
831
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
832
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
833
+ "previous_text": "",
834
+ "previous_type": "",
835
+ "previous_order": 0
836
+ }
837
+ },
838
+ {
839
+ "page_id": 13,
840
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
841
+ "block_counts": [
842
+ [
843
+ "Span",
844
+ 51
845
+ ],
846
+ [
847
+ "Line",
848
+ 26
849
+ ],
850
+ [
851
+ "Text",
852
+ 3
853
+ ],
854
+ [
855
+ "PageFooter",
856
+ 2
857
+ ],
858
+ [
859
+ "PageHeader",
860
+ 1
861
+ ]
862
+ ],
863
+ "block_metadata": {
864
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
865
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
866
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
867
+ "previous_text": "",
868
+ "previous_type": "",
869
+ "previous_order": 0
870
+ }
871
+ },
872
+ {
873
+ "page_id": 14,
874
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
875
+ "block_counts": [
876
+ [
877
+ "Span",
878
+ 55
879
+ ],
880
+ [
881
+ "Line",
882
+ 26
883
+ ],
884
+ [
885
+ "Text",
886
+ 4
887
+ ],
888
+ [
889
+ "PageFooter",
890
+ 2
891
+ ],
892
+ [
893
+ "PageHeader",
894
+ 1
895
+ ],
896
+ [
897
+ "SectionHeader",
898
+ 1
899
+ ]
900
+ ],
901
+ "block_metadata": {
902
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
903
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
904
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
905
+ "previous_text": "",
906
+ "previous_type": "",
907
+ "previous_order": 0
908
+ }
909
+ },
910
+ {
911
+ "page_id": 15,
912
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
913
+ "block_counts": [
914
+ [
915
+ "Span",
916
+ 57
917
+ ],
918
+ [
919
+ "Line",
920
+ 26
921
+ ],
922
+ [
923
+ "Text",
924
+ 3
925
+ ],
926
+ [
927
+ "PageFooter",
928
+ 2
929
+ ],
930
+ [
931
+ "PageHeader",
932
+ 1
933
+ ],
934
+ [
935
+ "SectionHeader",
936
+ 1
937
+ ]
938
+ ],
939
+ "block_metadata": {
940
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
941
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
942
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
943
+ "previous_text": "",
944
+ "previous_type": "",
945
+ "previous_order": 0
946
+ }
947
+ },
948
+ {
949
+ "page_id": 16,
950
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
951
+ "block_counts": [
952
+ [
953
+ "Span",
954
+ 55
955
+ ],
956
+ [
957
+ "Line",
958
+ 27
959
+ ],
960
+ [
961
+ "Text",
962
+ 2
963
+ ],
964
+ [
965
+ "PageFooter",
966
+ 2
967
+ ],
968
+ [
969
+ "PageHeader",
970
+ 1
971
+ ],
972
+ [
973
+ "SectionHeader",
974
+ 1
975
+ ]
976
+ ],
977
+ "block_metadata": {
978
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
979
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
980
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
981
+ "previous_text": "",
982
+ "previous_type": "",
983
+ "previous_order": 0
984
+ }
985
+ },
986
+ {
987
+ "page_id": 17,
988
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
989
+ "block_counts": [
990
+ [
991
+ "Span",
992
+ 58
993
+ ],
994
+ [
995
+ "Line",
996
+ 28
997
+ ],
998
+ [
999
+ "Text",
1000
+ 8
1001
+ ],
1002
+ [
1003
+ "PageFooter",
1004
+ 2
1005
+ ],
1006
+ [
1007
+ "PageHeader",
1008
+ 1
1009
+ ],
1010
+ [
1011
+ "SectionHeader",
1012
+ 1
1013
+ ]
1014
+ ],
1015
+ "block_metadata": {
1016
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
1017
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
1018
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
1019
+ "previous_text": "",
1020
+ "previous_type": "",
1021
+ "previous_order": 0
1022
+ }
1023
+ }
1024
+ ],
1025
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02750846"
1026
+ }
1027
+ }
marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750864/EFTA02750864.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ### PLAINTIFFS Jane Doe
2
+
3
+ The JS.44 civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replace nor Supplement the filing and service of pleadings a other papers as required by law. except as provided by local rules of court. This farm. approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September 1974. is recpared for use of the Clerk of Court for the purpose of initiating the civil docket sheet.
4
+
5
+ ATTORNEYS (FIRM NAME. ADDRESS. AND TELEPHONE NUMBER Roberta A. Kaplan Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP 350 Fifth Avenue, Suite 7110, New York, NY 10118
6
+
7
+ DEFENDANTS Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn. as executors for Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein
8
+
9
+ ATTORNEYS (IF KNOWN) Erika A. Keflerhals and William Blum, Kelerhals Palms Professional Building. 9053 Estate St. U.S. Virgin Islands 00802 Kroblin PLLC. . Suite 101
10
+
11
+ CAUSE OF ACTION (CITE THE U.S. CIVIL STATUTE UNDER WHICH YOU ARE FILING AND WRITE A BRIEF STATEMENT OF CAUSE) (DO NOT CITE JURISDICTIONAL STATUTES UNLESS DIVERSITY)
12
+
13
+ 28 USC 1332; New York causes of action
14
+
15
+ Has this action, case, or proceeding, or one essentially the same been previously filed in SONY at any time? No ['Yes': Judge Previously Assigned
16
+
17
+ If yes, was this case Vol. 0 Invol. ❑ Dismissed. No 0 Yes 0 If yes, give date & Case No.
18
+
19
+ IS THIS AN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CASH No 13 Yes 0
20
+
21
+ # (PLACE AN lx) IN ONE BOX ONLY) NATURE OF SUIT
22
+
23
+ # TORTS ACTIONS UNDER STATUTES
24
+
25
+ ## CONTRACT PERSONAL INJURY PERSONAL INJURY FORFEITURE/PEP/ALT/ BANKRUPTCY OTHER STATUTES
26
+
27
+ 367 HEALTHCARE/ PHARMACEUTICAL PERSONAL INJURY/PRCOUCT LIABILITY I 1825 DRUG RELATED ( )422 APPEAL SEIZURE OF PROPERTY 28 USC 158 ( ) 130 ACT LIABILITY I 1365 PERSONAL INJURY 21 USC 681 ( ) 423 WITHDRAWAL ( 1400 STATE PRODUCT LIABILITY f I I50 RECOVERY OF ( 1330 FEDERAL INJURY PRODUCT ( 1430 BANKS & BANKING OVERPAYMENTS EMPLOYERS LIABILITY PROPERTY RIGHTS ( 1450 COMMETICE ENFORCEMENT LIABILITY ( 1460 DEPORTATION OF JUDGMENT ( 1340 MARINE PERSONAL PROPERTY ( 1820 COPYRIGHTS ( 1470 RACKETEER INFLU. OVERPAYMENT INJURY I I 360 OTHER PERSONAL LABOR ( 1861 HIA (13ese!) 1 1850 SECURITIES/ OF VETERANS 11352 PERSONAL INJURY • PROPERTY DAMAGE ( 1862 BLACK LUNG (923) COMMODITIES/ BENEFITS MED MALPRACTICE 1 1385 PROPERTY DAMAGE I 710 FAIR LABOR ( 1863 DIWC/08VW (405(g)) EXCHANGE 11 180 STOCKHOLDERS PRODUCT LIABILITY STANDARDS ACT ( 1864 SSID TITLE XVI SUITS 1720 LABORMGMT ( 1865 R51 (406(9)) CONTRACT I I 453 AUER DETAINEE ) 740 RAILWAY LABOR ACT ACTIONS I 1510 MOTIONS TO VACATE SENTENCE I I 751 FAMILY MEDICAL FEDERAL LEAVE ACT (FIALA) LIABILITY 28 USC 2255 1870 TAXES (U.S. PISANI a ( ) 196 FRANCHISE CIVIL RIGHTS I 1530 HABEAS CORPUS 1790 OTHER LABOR Defendant) ( 1893 ENVIRONMENTAL 11535 DEATH PENALTY LITIGATION ( )871 IRSTHIRD PARTY MATTERS )440 OTHER GIRL RIGHTS I 1540 LIANDAMUS 8 OTHER 1 791 EMPL RET INC 26 USC 7609 ( 11996 FREEDOM OF (N441-PresoneN SECURITY ACT (ERISA) INFORMATION ACT REAL PROPERTY 8916 ARBITRATION PRISONER CML RIGHTS 1 1550 CIVIL RIGHTS IMMIGRATION I I 462 NATURALIZATION APPLICATION ( 1555 PRISON CONDITION 1 465 OTHER IMIAGRATION 1 1560 CML DETAINEE CONDITIONS OF CONFINEMENT
28
+
29
+ ( 110 ( 1 120 INSURANCE ( 1 310 A/RPLANE ( 1315 AIRPLANE PRODUCT ( 1 140 NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT ( 1320 ASSAULT. UBEL SLANDER ( 1 152 RECOVERY OF DEFAULTED LIABILITY ( 1350 MOTOR VEHICLE ( 1 153 (EXCL VETERANS) RECOVERY OF PRODUCT LIABILITY is 360 OTHER PERSONAL 11195 CONTRACT PRODUCT ACTIONS UNDER STATUTES ( 210 ( )220 LAND CONDEMNATION FORECLOSURE ( 1441 VOTING 442 EMPLOYMENT 11 443 HOUSWG/ ACCOMMODATIONS ( 1230 ( 1240 RENT LEASES EJECTMENT TORTS TO LAND ( 1 445 AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES. EMPLOYMENT ( )245 TORT PRODUCT ( 1446 AMERICANS WITH LIABILITY DISABILITIES OTHER ( )290 ALL OTHER 1448 EDUCATION REAL PROPERTY
30
+
31
+ 375 FALSE CLAIMS 1376 OUI TAM 1368 ASBESTOS PERSONAL 1690 OTHER ZS USC 157 REAPPORTIONMENT ( 1410 ANTITRUST 1151 MEDICARE ACT ( 1345 MARINE PRODUCT ( 1830 PATENT ENCED S CORRuPT 370 OTHER FRAUD 1 371 TRUTH IN LENDING 1 1835 PATENT-ABBREVIATED NEW DRUGAPPLICATION ORGANIZATION ACT (RICO) STUDENT LOANS f 1355 MOTOR VEHICLE 1 840 TRADEMARK ( 1480 CONSUMER CDIT SOCIAL SECURITY ( 1490 CABLE/SATELLREITE TV ( 190 OTHER PRISONER PETITIONS RELATIONS ( 1890 OTHER STATUTORY TAX SUITS ( 1891 AGRICULTURAL ACTS ( 1899 ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACTT REVIEW OR APPEAL OF AGENCY DECISION 11950 CONSTITUTIONALITY OF STATE STATUTES
32
+
33
+ Check if demanded in complaint:
34
+
35
+ ❑ CHECK IF THIS IS ACLASS ACTION UNDER F.R.C.P. 23
36
+
37
+ DEMAND \$ OTHER JUDGE DOCKET NUMBER
38
+
39
+ DO YOU CLAIM THIS CASE IS RELATED TO A CIVIL CASE NOW PENDING IN S.D.N.Y. AS DEFINED BY LOCAL RULE FOR DIVISION OF BUSINESS 137 IF SO, STATE:
40
+
41
+ | <input checked="" type="checkbox"/> 1 Original Proceeding | <input type="checkbox"/> 2 Removed from State Court | <input type="checkbox"/> 3 Remanded from Appellate Court | <input type="checkbox"/> 4 Reinstated or Reopened | <input type="checkbox"/> 5 Transferred from (Specify District) | <input type="checkbox"/> 6 Multidistrict Litigation (Transferred) | <input type="checkbox"/> 7 Appeal to District Judge from Magistrate Judge |
42
+ |-----------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
43
+ | <input type="checkbox"/> a. all parties represented | | | | <input type="checkbox"/> 8 Multidistrict Litigation (Direct File) | | |
44
+ | <input type="checkbox"/> b. At least one party is pro se. | | | | | | |
45
+
46
+ (PLACE AN x IN ONE BOX ONLY)
47
+
48
+ **BASIS OF JURISDICTION**
49
+
50
+ 1 U.S. PLAINTIFF 2 U.S. DEFENDANT 3 FEDERAL QUESTION 4 DIVERSITY
51
+ (U.S. NOT A PARTY)
52
+
53
+ **IF DIVERSITY, INDICATE CITIZENSHIP BELOW.**
54
+
55
+ **CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES (FOR DIVERSITY CASES ONLY)**
56
+
57
+ (Place an [X] in one box for Plaintiff and one box for Defendant)
58
+
59
+ | CITIZEN OF THIS STATE | PTF<br>[X] 1 | DEF<br>[ ] 1 | CITIZEN OR SUBJECT OF A FOREIGN COUNTRY | PTF DEF<br>[ ] 3 [ ] 3 | INCORPORATED and PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS IN ANOTHER STATE | PTF DEF<br>[ ] 5 [ ] 5 |
60
+ |--------------------------|--------------|--------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------|
61
+ | CITIZEN OF ANOTHER STATE | [ ] 2 [X] 2 | | INCORPORATED or PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS IN THIS STATE | [ ] 4 [ ] 4 | FOREIGN NATION | [ ] 6 [ ] 6 |
62
+
63
+ PLAINTIFF(S) ADDRESS(ES) AND COUNTY(IES)
64
+
65
+ Jane Doe
66
+ Nassau County, New York
67
+ c/o Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP
68
+ 350 Fifth Avenue, Suite 7110, New York, NY 10118
69
+
70
+ DEFENDANT(S) ADDRESS(ES) AND COUNTY(IES)
71
+
72
+ DEFENDANT(S) ADDRESS UNKNOWN
73
+
74
+ REPRESENTATION IS HEREBY MADE THAT, AT THIS TIME, I HAVE BEEN UNABLE, WITH REASONABLE DILIGENCE, TO ASCERTAIN THE RESIDENCE ADDRESSES OF THE FOLLOWING DEFENDANTS:
75
+
76
+ Defendants are sued as executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. Per 28 USC 1332, Defendants are deemed citizens of the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI), decedent Epstein's domicile. Defendants' residential addresses are unknown to Plaintiff. Defendants' counsel listed above.
77
+
78
+ **COURTHOUSE ASSIGNMENT**
79
+
80
+ I hereby certify that this case should be assigned to the courthouse indicated below pursuant to Local Rule for Division of Business 18, 20 or 21.
81
+
82
+ Check one: THIS ACTION SHOULD BE ASSIGNED TO: PLAINS MANHATTAN
83
+
84
+ DATE 9/19/2019
85
+
86
+ SIGNATURE OF ATTORNEY OF RECORD
87
+
88
+ ![]()ADMITTED TO PRACTICE IN THIS DISTRICT
89
+
90
+ [ ] NO
91
+
92
+ RECEIPT #
93
+
94
+ [X] YES (DATE ADMITTED Mo.05 Yr. 1993 )
95
+ Attorney Bar Code #
96
+
97
+ Magistrate Judge is to be designated by the Clerk of the Court.
98
+
99
+ Magistrate Judge \_\_\_\_\_ is so Designated.
marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750864/EFTA02750864.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,423 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750864.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 2,
15
+ "chars": 8598,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 11.75,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "PLAINTIFFS \nJane Doe",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 35.49000549316406,
27
+ 81.81
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 85.1344223022461,
31
+ 81.81
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 85.1344223022461,
35
+ 99.6500244140625
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 35.49000549316406,
39
+ 99.6500244140625
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "(PLACE AN lx) IN ONE BOX ONLY) NATURE OF SUIT",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 35.496,
50
+ 273.67889404296875
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 332.39276123046875,
54
+ 273.67889404296875
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 332.39276123046875,
58
+ 287.6835632324219
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 35.496,
62
+ 287.6835632324219
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ },
66
+ {
67
+ "title": "",
68
+ "heading_level": null,
69
+ "page_id": 0,
70
+ "polygon": [
71
+ [
72
+ 249.696,
73
+ 275.40000000000003
74
+ ],
75
+ [
76
+ 329.25600000000003,
77
+ 275.40000000000003
78
+ ],
79
+ [
80
+ 329.25600000000003,
81
+ 285.92999999999995
82
+ ],
83
+ [
84
+ 249.696,
85
+ 285.92999999999995
86
+ ]
87
+ ]
88
+ },
89
+ {
90
+ "title": "TORTS ACTIONS UNDER STATUTES",
91
+ "heading_level": null,
92
+ "page_id": 0,
93
+ "polygon": [
94
+ [
95
+ 131.8800048828125,
96
+ 291.6
97
+ ],
98
+ [
99
+ 491.39691162109375,
100
+ 291.6
101
+ ],
102
+ [
103
+ 491.39691162109375,
104
+ 301.5562438964844
105
+ ],
106
+ [
107
+ 131.8800048828125,
108
+ 301.5562438964844
109
+ ]
110
+ ]
111
+ },
112
+ {
113
+ "title": "",
114
+ "heading_level": null,
115
+ "page_id": 0,
116
+ "polygon": [
117
+ [
118
+ 35.496,
119
+ 319.95000000000005
120
+ ],
121
+ [
122
+ 72.216,
123
+ 319.95000000000005
124
+ ],
125
+ [
126
+ 72.216,
127
+ 328.05
128
+ ],
129
+ [
130
+ 35.496,
131
+ 328.05
132
+ ]
133
+ ]
134
+ },
135
+ {
136
+ "title": "",
137
+ "heading_level": null,
138
+ "page_id": 0,
139
+ "polygon": [
140
+ [
141
+ 133.416,
142
+ 319.95000000000005
143
+ ],
144
+ [
145
+ 189.72,
146
+ 319.95000000000005
147
+ ],
148
+ [
149
+ 189.72,
150
+ 328.05
151
+ ],
152
+ [
153
+ 133.416,
154
+ 328.05
155
+ ]
156
+ ]
157
+ },
158
+ {
159
+ "title": "",
160
+ "heading_level": null,
161
+ "page_id": 0,
162
+ "polygon": [
163
+ [
164
+ 225.216,
165
+ 319.95000000000005
166
+ ],
167
+ [
168
+ 281.52,
169
+ 319.95000000000005
170
+ ],
171
+ [
172
+ 281.52,
173
+ 328.05
174
+ ],
175
+ [
176
+ 225.216,
177
+ 328.05
178
+ ]
179
+ ]
180
+ },
181
+ {
182
+ "title": "",
183
+ "heading_level": null,
184
+ "page_id": 0,
185
+ "polygon": [
186
+ [
187
+ 317.01599999999996,
188
+ 319.95000000000005
189
+ ],
190
+ [
191
+ 382.5,
192
+ 319.95000000000005
193
+ ],
194
+ [
195
+ 382.5,
196
+ 328.05
197
+ ],
198
+ [
199
+ 317.01599999999996,
200
+ 328.05
201
+ ]
202
+ ]
203
+ },
204
+ {
205
+ "title": "CONTRACT PERSONAL INJURY PERSONAL INJURY FORFEITURE/PEP/ALT/ BANKRUPTCY OTHER STATUTES",
206
+ "heading_level": null,
207
+ "page_id": 0,
208
+ "polygon": [
209
+ [
210
+ 36.91999816894531,
211
+ 319.95000000000005
212
+ ],
213
+ [
214
+ 557.0232543945312,
215
+ 319.95000000000005
216
+ ],
217
+ [
218
+ 557.0232543945312,
219
+ 329.3062438964844
220
+ ],
221
+ [
222
+ 36.91999816894531,
223
+ 329.3062438964844
224
+ ]
225
+ ]
226
+ },
227
+ {
228
+ "title": "",
229
+ "heading_level": null,
230
+ "page_id": 0,
231
+ "polygon": [
232
+ [
233
+ 500.616,
234
+ 319.95000000000005
235
+ ],
236
+ [
237
+ 556.9200000000001,
238
+ 319.95000000000005
239
+ ],
240
+ [
241
+ 556.9200000000001,
242
+ 328.05
243
+ ],
244
+ [
245
+ 500.616,
246
+ 328.05
247
+ ]
248
+ ]
249
+ },
250
+ {
251
+ "title": "ORIGIN",
252
+ "heading_level": null,
253
+ "page_id": 1,
254
+ "polygon": [
255
+ [
256
+ 299.88,
257
+ 33.21
258
+ ],
259
+ [
260
+ 338.43600000000004,
261
+ 33.21
262
+ ],
263
+ [
264
+ 338.43600000000004,
265
+ 43.74
266
+ ],
267
+ [
268
+ 299.88,
269
+ 43.74
270
+ ]
271
+ ]
272
+ },
273
+ {
274
+ "title": "BASIS OF JURISDICTION",
275
+ "heading_level": null,
276
+ "page_id": 1,
277
+ "polygon": [
278
+ [
279
+ 257.03999999999996,
280
+ 110.97
281
+ ],
282
+ [
283
+ 381.276,
284
+ 110.97
285
+ ],
286
+ [
287
+ 381.276,
288
+ 121.5
289
+ ],
290
+ [
291
+ 257.03999999999996,
292
+ 121.5
293
+ ]
294
+ ]
295
+ },
296
+ {
297
+ "title": "CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES (FOR DIVERSITY CASES ONLY)",
298
+ "heading_level": null,
299
+ "page_id": 1,
300
+ "polygon": [
301
+ [
302
+ 145.656,
303
+ 154.71
304
+ ],
305
+ [
306
+ 482.86800000000005,
307
+ 154.71
308
+ ],
309
+ [
310
+ 482.86800000000005,
311
+ 166.85999999999999
312
+ ],
313
+ [
314
+ 145.656,
315
+ 166.85999999999999
316
+ ]
317
+ ]
318
+ },
319
+ {
320
+ "title": "COURTHOUSE ASSIGNMENT",
321
+ "heading_level": null,
322
+ "page_id": 1,
323
+ "polygon": [
324
+ [
325
+ 253.36799999999997,
326
+ 539.46
327
+ ],
328
+ [
329
+ 381.276,
330
+ 539.46
331
+ ],
332
+ [
333
+ 381.276,
334
+ 549.99
335
+ ],
336
+ [
337
+ 253.36799999999997,
338
+ 549.99
339
+ ]
340
+ ]
341
+ }
342
+ ],
343
+ "page_stats": [
344
+ {
345
+ "page_id": 0,
346
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
347
+ "block_counts": [
348
+ [
349
+ "Span",
350
+ 356
351
+ ],
352
+ [
353
+ "Line",
354
+ 134
355
+ ],
356
+ [
357
+ "Text",
358
+ 19
359
+ ],
360
+ [
361
+ "SectionHeader",
362
+ 10
363
+ ],
364
+ [
365
+ "PageHeader",
366
+ 3
367
+ ],
368
+ [
369
+ "PageFooter",
370
+ 1
371
+ ]
372
+ ],
373
+ "block_metadata": {
374
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
375
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
376
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
377
+ "previous_text": "",
378
+ "previous_type": "",
379
+ "previous_order": 0
380
+ }
381
+ },
382
+ {
383
+ "page_id": 1,
384
+ "text_extraction_method": "surya",
385
+ "block_counts": [
386
+ [
387
+ "Text",
388
+ 48
389
+ ],
390
+ [
391
+ "SectionHeader",
392
+ 6
393
+ ],
394
+ [
395
+ "Form",
396
+ 4
397
+ ],
398
+ [
399
+ "PageHeader",
400
+ 2
401
+ ],
402
+ [
403
+ "Table",
404
+ 2
405
+ ],
406
+ [
407
+ "PageFooter",
408
+ 2
409
+ ]
410
+ ],
411
+ "block_metadata": {
412
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
413
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
414
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
415
+ "previous_text": "",
416
+ "previous_type": "",
417
+ "previous_order": 0
418
+ }
419
+ }
420
+ ],
421
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02750864"
422
+ }
423
+ }
marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750866/EFTA02750866.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
2
+
3
+ JANE DOE,
4
+
5
+ Plaint
6
+
7
+ v.
8
+
9
+ Case No. 19 Civ. 8673
10
+
11
+ DARREN INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, in their capacities as executors of the ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN,
12
+
13
+ Defendants.
14
+
15
+ ## NOTICE OF APPEARANCE
16
+
17
+ To the Clerk of this court and all parties of record:
18
+
19
+ Please enter my appearance as counsel in this case for PlaintiffJane Doe. I certify that I am admitted to practice in this Court.
20
+
21
+ Dated: September 20, 2019 New York, New York
22
+
23
+ /s/ Julie E. Fink
24
+
25
+ Julie E. Fink
26
+
27
+ KAPLAN HECKER & FINK LLP
28
+
29
+ 350 Fifth Avenue, Suite 7110
30
+
31
+ New York, New York 10118
32
+
33
+ Telephone: (212) 763-0883
34
+
35
+ Facsimile: (212) 564-0883
36
+
37
+ jfink®kaplanhecker.com
38
+
39
+ Counsel for Plaintiff Doe
marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750866/EFTA02750866.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750866.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 1,
15
+ "chars": 704,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 0.98,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 192.78000000000003,
27
+ 72.08999999999999
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 418.5074768066406,
31
+ 72.08999999999999
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 418.5074768066406,
35
+ 100.10302734375
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 192.78000000000003,
39
+ 100.10302734375
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "NOTICE OF APPEARANCE",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 227.052,
50
+ 320.76
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 385.0557861328125,
54
+ 320.76
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 385.0557861328125,
58
+ 335.9830322265625
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 227.052,
62
+ 335.9830322265625
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ }
66
+ ],
67
+ "page_stats": [
68
+ {
69
+ "page_id": 0,
70
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
71
+ "block_counts": [
72
+ [
73
+ "Span",
74
+ 58
75
+ ],
76
+ [
77
+ "Line",
78
+ 28
79
+ ],
80
+ [
81
+ "Text",
82
+ 18
83
+ ],
84
+ [
85
+ "SectionHeader",
86
+ 2
87
+ ],
88
+ [
89
+ "PageFooter",
90
+ 2
91
+ ],
92
+ [
93
+ "PageHeader",
94
+ 1
95
+ ]
96
+ ],
97
+ "block_metadata": {
98
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
99
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
100
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
101
+ "previous_text": "",
102
+ "previous_type": "",
103
+ "previous_order": 0
104
+ }
105
+ }
106
+ ],
107
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02750866"
108
+ }
109
+ }
marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750867/EFTA02750867.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
2
+
3
+ JANE DOE,
4
+
5
+ Plaintiff;
6
+
7
+ v.
8
+
9
+ DARREN . INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, in their capacities as executors of the ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN,
10
+
11
+ Defendants.
12
+
13
+ Case No. 19 Civ. 8673
14
+
15
+ ## NOTICE OF APPEARANCE
16
+
17
+ To the Clerk of this court and all parties of record:
18
+
19
+ Please enter my appearance as counsel in this case for PlaintiffJane Doe. I certify that I am admitted to practice in this Court.
20
+
21
+ Dated: September 20, 2019 New York, New York
22
+
23
+ /s/ Jenna M. Dabbs
24
+
25
+ Jenna M. Dabbs
26
+
27
+ KAPLAN HECKER & FINK LLP
28
+
29
+ 350 Fifth Avenue, Suite 7110
30
+
31
+ New York, New York 10118
32
+
33
+ Telephone: (212) 763-0883
34
+
35
+ Facsimile: (212) 564-0883
36
+
37
+ jdabbs@kaplanhecker.com
38
+
39
+ Counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe
marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750867/EFTA02750867.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750867.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 1,
15
+ "chars": 718,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 0.97,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 192.78000000000003,
27
+ 72.08999999999999
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 418.5074768066406,
31
+ 72.08999999999999
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 418.5074768066406,
35
+ 100.10302734375
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 192.78000000000003,
39
+ 100.10302734375
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "NOTICE OF APPEARANCE",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 227.052,
50
+ 320.76
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 385.0771484375,
54
+ 320.76
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 385.0771484375,
58
+ 335.9830322265625
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 227.052,
62
+ 335.9830322265625
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ }
66
+ ],
67
+ "page_stats": [
68
+ {
69
+ "page_id": 0,
70
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
71
+ "block_counts": [
72
+ [
73
+ "Span",
74
+ 58
75
+ ],
76
+ [
77
+ "Line",
78
+ 28
79
+ ],
80
+ [
81
+ "Text",
82
+ 18
83
+ ],
84
+ [
85
+ "SectionHeader",
86
+ 2
87
+ ],
88
+ [
89
+ "PageFooter",
90
+ 2
91
+ ],
92
+ [
93
+ "PageHeader",
94
+ 1
95
+ ]
96
+ ],
97
+ "block_metadata": {
98
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
99
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
100
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
101
+ "previous_text": "",
102
+ "previous_type": "",
103
+ "previous_order": 0
104
+ }
105
+ }
106
+ ],
107
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02750867"
108
+ }
109
+ }
marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750868/EFTA02750868.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
2
+
3
+ JANE DOE,
4
+
5
+ Plaintiff,
6
+
7
+ v.
8
+
9
+ Case No. 19 Civ. 8673
10
+
11
+ DARREN INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, in their capacities as executors of the ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN,
12
+
13
+ Defendants.
14
+
15
+ ## NOTICE OF APPEARANCE
16
+
17
+ To the Clerk of this court and all parties of record:
18
+
19
+ Please enter my appearance as counsel in this case for Plaintiff Jane Doe. I certify that I am admitted to practice in this Court.
20
+
21
+ Dated: September 20, 2019 New York, New York
22
+
23
+ /s/ Justin Horton
24
+
25
+ Justin Horton
26
+
27
+ KAPLAN HECKER & FINK LLP
28
+
29
+ 350 Fifth Avenue, Suite 7110
30
+
31
+ New York, New York 10118
32
+
33
+ Telephone: (212) 763-0883
34
+
35
+ Facsimile: (212) 564-0883
36
+
37
+ jhorton©,kaplanhecker.com
38
+
39
+ Counsel for Plaintiff Doe
marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750868/EFTA02750868.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750868.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 1,
15
+ "chars": 712,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 1.01,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 192.168,
27
+ 72.08999999999999
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 418.5074768066406,
31
+ 72.08999999999999
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 418.5074768066406,
35
+ 100.10302734375
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 192.168,
39
+ 100.10302734375
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "NOTICE OF APPEARANCE",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 226.44,
50
+ 320.76
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 385.0771484375,
54
+ 320.76
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 385.0771484375,
58
+ 336.363037109375
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 226.44,
62
+ 336.363037109375
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ }
66
+ ],
67
+ "page_stats": [
68
+ {
69
+ "page_id": 0,
70
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
71
+ "block_counts": [
72
+ [
73
+ "Span",
74
+ 57
75
+ ],
76
+ [
77
+ "Line",
78
+ 28
79
+ ],
80
+ [
81
+ "Text",
82
+ 18
83
+ ],
84
+ [
85
+ "SectionHeader",
86
+ 2
87
+ ],
88
+ [
89
+ "PageFooter",
90
+ 2
91
+ ],
92
+ [
93
+ "PageHeader",
94
+ 1
95
+ ]
96
+ ],
97
+ "block_metadata": {
98
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
99
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
100
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
101
+ "previous_text": "",
102
+ "previous_type": "",
103
+ "previous_order": 0
104
+ }
105
+ }
106
+ ],
107
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02750868"
108
+ }
109
+ }
marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750869/EFTA02750869.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ Bennet J. Moskowitz
2
+
3
+ bennet.moskowitz@troutman.com
4
+
5
+ October 4, 2019
6
+
7
+ ECF
8
+
9
+ Hon. Katherine Polk Failla Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007
10
+
11
+ Re: Jane Doe v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, in their capacities as the Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, 1:19-cv-08673-KPF
12
+
13
+ Dear Judge Failla:
14
+
15
+ We represent Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (together, "Defendants"), in the referenced action. We write to respectfully request the Court's approval of the parties' agreement described below.
16
+
17
+ On September 24, 2019, subject to the Court's approval: (1) we agreed to accept service of Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF #1) on Defendants' behalf; (2) Plaintiff consented to Defendants having through November 15, 2019 to answer, move or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint; and (3) Plaintiff consented to Defendants having through November 15, 2019 to answer, move or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed Under Pseudonym (ECF #3).
18
+
19
+ There have been no other requests for adjournments or extensions of time in this action.
20
+
21
+ Thank you for your attention to this matter.
22
+
23
+ Respectfully submitted,
24
+
25
+ s/Bennet J Moskowitz
26
+
27
+ Bennet J. Moskowitz
marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750869/EFTA02750869.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750869.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 1,
15
+ "chars": 1250,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 0.86,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [],
20
+ "page_stats": [
21
+ {
22
+ "page_id": 0,
23
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
24
+ "block_counts": [
25
+ [
26
+ "Span",
27
+ 69
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ "Line",
31
+ 34
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ "Text",
35
+ 14
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ "PageHeader",
39
+ 4
40
+ ],
41
+ [
42
+ "PageFooter",
43
+ 1
44
+ ]
45
+ ],
46
+ "block_metadata": {
47
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
48
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
49
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
50
+ "previous_text": "",
51
+ "previous_type": "",
52
+ "previous_order": 0
53
+ }
54
+ }
55
+ ],
56
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02750869"
57
+ }
58
+ }
marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750870/EFTA02750870.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ Troutman Sanders LLP
2
+ 875 Third Avenue
3
+ New York, New York 10022
4
+
5
+ troutman.com
6
+
7
+ ![](_page_0_Picture_150.jpeg)
8
+
9
+ **Bennet J. Moskowitz**
10
+ bennet.moskowitz@troutman.com
11
+
12
+ **MEMO ENDORSED**
13
+
14
+ October 4, 2019
15
+
16
+ **ECF**
17
+
18
+ Hon. Katherine Polk Failla
19
+ Thurgood Marshall
20
+ United States Courthouse
21
+ 40 Foley Square
22
+ New York, NY 10007
23
+
24
+ **Re: *Jane Doe v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, in their capacities as the Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, 1:19-cv-08673-KPF***
25
+
26
+ Dear Judge Failla:
27
+
28
+ We represent Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (together, "Defendants"), in the referenced action. We write to respectfully request the Court's approval of the parties' agreement described below.
29
+
30
+ On September 24, 2019, subject to the Court's approval: (1) we agreed to accept service of Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF #1) on Defendants' behalf; (2) Plaintiff consented to Defendants having through November 15, 2019 to answer, move or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint; and (3) Plaintiff consented to Defendants having through November 15, 2019 to answer, move or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed Under Pseudonym (ECF #3).
31
+
32
+ There have been no other requests for adjournments or extensions of time in this action.
33
+
34
+ Thank you for your attention to this matter.
35
+
36
+ Respectfully submitted,
37
+
38
+ *s/Bennet J. Moskowitz*
39
+ Bennet J. Moskowitz
40
+
41
+ Application GRANTED.
42
+
43
+ SO ORDERED.
44
+
45
+ ![]()HON. KATHERINE POLK FAILLA
46
+ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750870/EFTA02750870.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750870.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 1,
15
+ "chars": 1508,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 6.55,
17
+ "image_assets": [
18
+ "_page_0_Picture_150.jpeg"
19
+ ],
20
+ "marker_metadata": {
21
+ "table_of_contents": [],
22
+ "page_stats": [
23
+ {
24
+ "page_id": 0,
25
+ "text_extraction_method": "surya",
26
+ "block_counts": [
27
+ [
28
+ "Span",
29
+ 83
30
+ ],
31
+ [
32
+ "Line",
33
+ 41
34
+ ],
35
+ [
36
+ "Text",
37
+ 40
38
+ ],
39
+ [
40
+ "PageHeader",
41
+ 2
42
+ ],
43
+ [
44
+ "Picture",
45
+ 2
46
+ ],
47
+ [
48
+ "PageFooter",
49
+ 2
50
+ ]
51
+ ],
52
+ "block_metadata": {
53
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
54
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
55
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
56
+ "previous_text": "",
57
+ "previous_type": "",
58
+ "previous_order": 0
59
+ }
60
+ }
61
+ ],
62
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02750870"
63
+ }
64
+ }
marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750870/_page_0_Picture_150.jpeg ADDED

Git LFS Details

  • SHA256: e92b42d2f0318bc68905537abf4675e1010b7211be2e195465e7d17d65cf2846
  • Pointer size: 129 Bytes
  • Size of remote file: 7.26 kB
marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750871/EFTA02750871.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
2
+
3
+ JANE DOE,
4
+
5
+ Plaintiff,
6
+
7
+ DARREN K INDYKE, et al.,
8
+
9
+ Defendants.
10
+
11
+ 19 Civ. 8673 (KPF)
12
+
13
+ ## NOTICE OF INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE
14
+
15
+ KATHERINE POLK FAILLA, District Judge:
16
+
17
+ This case has been assigned to me for all purposes. It is hereby ORDERED that counsel for all parties appear for an initial pretrial conference with the Court on December 13, 2019, at 11:00 a.m., in Courtroom 618 of the Thurgood Marshall Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, New York, New York.
18
+
19
+ All counsel are required to register promptly as filing users on ECF. All pretrial conferences must be attended by the attorney who will serve as principal trial counsel. Counsel are further required to review and comply with the Court's Individual Rules of Practice in Civil Cases ("Individual Rules") available at http: / / nysd.uscourts.gov/ judge / Failla.
20
+
21
+ Counsel are directed to confer with each other prior to the conference regarding settlement and each of the other subjects to be considered at a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16 conference. Additionally, in accordance with the Court's Individual Rules, the parties are hereby ORDERED to file by ECF and to submit via e-mail (Failla NYSDChambersOnvsd.uscourts.gov) a Proposed Civil Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order in PDF format by Thursday of the week prior to the initial pretrial conference. The parties shall use this Court's form Proposed Civil Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order, which is also available at http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judge/Failla. Any open legal issues can be addressed at the conference.
22
+
23
+ IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that included with the Proposed Civil Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order, the parties jointly submit a letter, not to exceed five pages, providing the following information in separate paragraphs:
24
+
25
+ - (i) A brief statement of the nature of the action, the principal defenses thereto, and the major legal and factual issues that are most important to resolving the case, whether by trial, settlement, or dispositive motion;
26
+ - (ii) A brief explanation of why jurisdiction and venue lie in this Court. In
27
+
28
+ any action in which subject matter jurisdiction is founded on diversity of citizenship pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 1332, the letter must explain the basis for the parties' belief that diversity of citizenship exists. Where any party is a corporation, the letter shall state both the place of incorporation and the principal place of business. In cases where any party is a partnership, limited partnership, limited liability company, or trust, the letter shall state the citizenship of each of the entity's members, shareholders, partners, and/or trustees. See, e.g., Handelsman v. Bedford Vill. Assocs. L.P., 213 F.3d 48 (2d Cir. 2000).
29
+
30
+ - (iii) A statement of all existing deadlines, due dates, and/or cut-off dates;
31
+ - (iv) A brief description of any outstanding motions;
32
+ - (v) A brief description of any discovery that has already taken place and of any discovery that is necessary for the parties to engage in meaningful settlement negotiations;
33
+ - (vi) A statement describing the status of any settlement discussions and whether the parties would like a settlement conference; and
34
+ - (vii) Any other information that the parties believe may assist the Court in advancing the case to settlement or trial, including, but not limited to, a description of any dispositive issue or novel issue raised by the case.
35
+
36
+ If this case has been settled or otherwise terminated, counsel are not required to submit such letter or to appear, provided that a stipulation of discontinuance, voluntary dismissal, or other proof of termination is sent prior to the date of the conference via e-mail to the Orders and Judgments Clerk at the following e-mail address: judgments®nysd.uscourts.gov.
37
+
38
+ In accordance with the Court's Individual Rules and Practices, requests for an extension or adjournment may be made only by letter and must be received at least 48 hours before the deadline or conference. The written submission must state (i) the original date(s); (ii) the number of previous requests for adjournment or extension; (iii) whether these previous requests were granted or denied; (iv) the reason for the current request; and (v) whether the adversary consents and, if not, the reasons given by the adversary for refusing to consent. Unless counsel are notified that the conference has been adjourned, it will be held as scheduled.
39
+
40
+ Counsel who have noticed an appearance as of the issuance of this order are directed (i) to notify all other parties' attorneys in this action by serving upon each of them a copy of this order and the Court's Individual Rules forthwith, and (ii) to file
41
+
42
+ proof of such notice with the Court. If unaware of the identity of counsel for any of the parties, counsel receiving this order must forthwith send a copy of this order and the Court's Individual Rules to that party personally.
43
+
44
+ The Court schedules initial pretrial conferences with the expectation that one or more of the parties would like an in-person opportunity to bring matters to the Court's attention, and it welcomes that opportunity. However, the Court recognizes that in certain circumstances — as, for example, where the parties are in agreement about the proposed discovery schedule and have no issues to raise with the Court — such conferences may represent less-efficient uses of the parties' time and resources. If the parties agree on a schedule that calls for the close of all discovery within six months, and have no other issues to raise with the Court, the parties can, if they wish, submit a Proposed Civil Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order and request in their joint letter that the initial pretrial conference be cancelled. The Court will ordinarily grant such requests.
45
+
46
+ SO ORDERED.
47
+
48
+ Dated: October 15, 2019
49
+
50
+ New York, New York
51
+
52
+ KATHERINE POLK FAILLA United States District Judge
marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750871/EFTA02750871.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,193 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750871.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 3,
15
+ "chars": 5950,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 0.9,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 51.40800000000001,
27
+ 67.23
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 281.5348205566406,
31
+ 67.23
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 281.5348205566406,
35
+ 96.49249267578125
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 51.40800000000001,
39
+ 96.49249267578125
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "NOTICE OF INITIAL \nPRETRIAL CONFERENCE",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 326.196,
50
+ 160.38
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 491.4447021484375,
54
+ 160.38
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 491.4447021484375,
58
+ 188.73248291015625
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 326.196,
62
+ 188.73248291015625
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ }
66
+ ],
67
+ "page_stats": [
68
+ {
69
+ "page_id": 0,
70
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
71
+ "block_counts": [
72
+ [
73
+ "Span",
74
+ 80
75
+ ],
76
+ [
77
+ "Line",
78
+ 38
79
+ ],
80
+ [
81
+ "Text",
82
+ 11
83
+ ],
84
+ [
85
+ "SectionHeader",
86
+ 2
87
+ ],
88
+ [
89
+ "ListItem",
90
+ 2
91
+ ],
92
+ [
93
+ "PageHeader",
94
+ 1
95
+ ],
96
+ [
97
+ "ListGroup",
98
+ 1
99
+ ],
100
+ [
101
+ "PageFooter",
102
+ 1
103
+ ]
104
+ ],
105
+ "block_metadata": {
106
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
107
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
108
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
109
+ "previous_text": "",
110
+ "previous_type": "",
111
+ "previous_order": 0
112
+ }
113
+ },
114
+ {
115
+ "page_id": 1,
116
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
117
+ "block_counts": [
118
+ [
119
+ "Span",
120
+ 75
121
+ ],
122
+ [
123
+ "Line",
124
+ 38
125
+ ],
126
+ [
127
+ "ListItem",
128
+ 5
129
+ ],
130
+ [
131
+ "Text",
132
+ 4
133
+ ],
134
+ [
135
+ "PageFooter",
136
+ 2
137
+ ],
138
+ [
139
+ "PageHeader",
140
+ 1
141
+ ],
142
+ [
143
+ "ListGroup",
144
+ 1
145
+ ]
146
+ ],
147
+ "block_metadata": {
148
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
149
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
150
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
151
+ "previous_text": "",
152
+ "previous_type": "",
153
+ "previous_order": 0
154
+ }
155
+ },
156
+ {
157
+ "page_id": 2,
158
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
159
+ "block_counts": [
160
+ [
161
+ "Line",
162
+ 22
163
+ ],
164
+ [
165
+ "Span",
166
+ 22
167
+ ],
168
+ [
169
+ "Text",
170
+ 6
171
+ ],
172
+ [
173
+ "PageFooter",
174
+ 2
175
+ ],
176
+ [
177
+ "PageHeader",
178
+ 1
179
+ ]
180
+ ],
181
+ "block_metadata": {
182
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
183
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
184
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
185
+ "previous_text": "",
186
+ "previous_type": "",
187
+ "previous_order": 0
188
+ }
189
+ }
190
+ ],
191
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02750871"
192
+ }
193
+ }
marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750874/EFTA02750874.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ## EXHIBIT A
2
+
3
+ ## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
4
+
5
+ ICATLYN DOE,
6
+
7
+ x
8
+
9
+ Plaintiff, 19-cv-7771 (PKC)
10
+
11
+ -against- ORDER
12
+
13
+ DARREN K. INDYKE, et al..,
14
+
15
+ Defendant.
16
+
17
+ x
18
+
19
+ CASTEL, U.S.D.J.
20
+
21
+ Plaintiff seeks leave to proceed in this action without disclosing her identity using instead a pseudonym. She alleges that Jeffrey Epstein, with the assistance of associates and entities, engaged in "manipulate[ion]," "control," "sexual exploitation," "sexual assault[]," "sexual abuse," and "forced... intercourse" of or with plaintiff; she was seventeen when the course of conduct began. (Complaint n 58-68.) At this juncture, no defendant has been served.
22
+
23
+ Rule 10(a), Fed. R. Civ. P., provides that "[t]he title of [a] complaint must name all the parties." The Second Circuit has recognized that the use of a pseudonym is, however, appropriate in limited circumstances where the reasons for anonymity outweigh the public's right of access to judicial proceedings and any prejudice to a defendant. Sealed Plaintiff v. Sealed Defendant. 537 F.3d 185, 189 (24 Cir. 2008). The Circuit's opinion in Sealed Plaintiff lays out ten non-exhaustive factors to be considered in determining whether to allow a case to proceed on an anonymous basis. M. at 190. The Court analyzes the Complaint in light of these factors.
24
+
25
+ - (1) whether the litigation involves matters that are highly sensitive and of a personal nature.
26
+
27
+ The Complaint alleges an on-going pattern of sexual assault and abuse beginning when plaintiff was seventeen years-old and asserts that she has and is continuing to suffer psychological injury as a result. (Complaint 11 52-65.) These are highly sensitive allegations of a personal nature.
28
+
29
+ - (2) whether identification of the plaintiff poses a risk of physical or mental retaliation to the plaintiff or to a third party.
30
+
31
+ No risk of retaliation is alleged. Jeffrey Epstein is dead and there is no credible evidence of a risk of retaliation from others. There is an allegation of threats of retaliation in the past if she did not comply with demands for sex acts that she would suffer financial, psychological, and reputational harm ad, 1 84) but no facts are alleged that those threats arc likely to continue after the death of Epstein.
32
+
33
+ - (3) whether identification of plaintiff poses the risk of other harms, their likely severity and whether they are of the type that the litigation seeks to redress.
34
+
35
+ The nature of the allegations make it logical to conclude at this early stage that disclosure of plaintiffs identity would cause further psychological harm to plaintiff which is the precise harm the litigation seeks, in part, to redress.
36
+
37
+ (4) whether there are other factors that make the plaintiff particularly vulnerable to harm of disclosure, for example. because of her age.
38
+
39
+ By the Court's calculation, the plaintiff is 29 or 30. She is described in the complaint as having physical conditions that make her particularly vulnerable. a 11 54-55.) She alleges that she has incurred and will continue to incur "medical and psychological expenses" as a result of the conduct alleged. ild. 9132.)
40
+
41
+ (5) whether the action challenges the actions of government or government actors, or merely private parties.
42
+
43
+ The actions alleged are not the actions of a government actor or instrumentality but rather those of private parties.
44
+
45
+ (6) the nature of any prejudice to a defendant from allowing the plaintiff to proceed anonymously and whether any prejudice can be mitigated by the court.
46
+
47
+ The Complaint alleges that the representatives of the estate of Epstein have liability for his actions. It also alleges that various non-natural persons are liable for acts and omissions causing plaintiff harm. In such circumstances it is critical that the accused defendants know the identity of the plaintiff in order to investigate and defend against the claim. The Court can mitigate the prejudice to defendants by requiring the disclosure of the actual name of the plaintiff in a document to be sewed on defendants and also filed under seal with the Court. Plaintiff does not object to disclosure "for discovery purposes on the condition that Defendants do not disclose Plaintiff's name to the general public." (P. Mem. 6; Doc 3-1.)
48
+
49
+ (7) whether the plaintiffs identity has thus far been kept confidential,
50
+
51
+ Insofar as the Court is aware, the identity of the plaintiff is not widely known.
52
+
53
+ (8) whether there is a legitimate public interest or benefit in requiring the plaintiff to disclose her identity.
54
+
55
+ There is public interest in the litigation because of the notoriety of Epstein and those with whom he associated, but disclosure of the identity of the plaintiff is not likely to be of a legitimate importance or benefit to the public.
56
+
57
+ (9) Whether the issues in the action are predominately or purely legal nature suggesting that the public interest in the plaintiff's identity may be weak.
58
+
59
+ The issues in the case are not purely or predominately of a legal nature. This case turns principally on its facts.
60
+
61
+ (10) whether there are any alternative mechanisms for protecting the confidentiality of the plaintiff.
62
+
63
+ It is the disclosure of her identity that would exacerbate any preexisting harm to plaintiff and hence there is not alternative mechanism for protecting her confidentiality.
64
+
65
+ ## CONCLUSION
66
+
67
+ Factors 1 and 3 tilt strongly in favor of permitting plaintiff to proceed anonymously and are supported by factors 4, 6, 7, 8 and 10. Factors 2, 5, 9 are either neutral or
68
+
69
+ weakly support denying the motion. The Court concludes that, at this juncture, the public right to know is substantially outweighed by the plaintiff's legitimate need for anonymity and that prejudice to a defendant can be mitigated by orders of the Court. The Court reserves the right to modify this Order as the case progresses.
70
+
71
+ Plaintiff's motion (Doc 3) is GRANTED. Within seven days of the appearance of a defendant, plaintiff shall disclose her identity to the appearing defendant in a document to be submitted to the Court for sealing. No defendant may disclose the identity of plaintiff to any person other than counsel without further order of this Court.
72
+
73
+ SO ORDERED.
74
+
75
+ ![]()Dated: New York, New York
76
+ September 11, 2019
marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750874/EFTA02750874.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,318 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750874.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 6,
15
+ "chars": 6219,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 3.97,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "EXHIBIT A",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 181.76399999999998,
27
+ 280.17437744140625
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 437.49151611328125,
31
+ 280.17437744140625
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 437.49151611328125,
35
+ 330.6527099609375
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 181.76399999999998,
39
+ 330.6527099609375
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 1,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 70.38,
50
+ 72.9
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 289.033447265625,
54
+ 72.9
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 289.033447265625,
58
+ 102.11248779296875
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 70.38,
62
+ 102.11248779296875
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ },
66
+ {
67
+ "title": "CONCLUSION",
68
+ "heading_level": null,
69
+ "page_id": 4,
70
+ "polygon": [
71
+ [
72
+ 66.708,
73
+ 624.51
74
+ ],
75
+ [
76
+ 149.1510772705078,
77
+ 624.51
78
+ ],
79
+ [
80
+ 149.1510772705078,
81
+ 640.2324981689453
82
+ ],
83
+ [
84
+ 66.708,
85
+ 640.2324981689453
86
+ ]
87
+ ]
88
+ }
89
+ ],
90
+ "page_stats": [
91
+ {
92
+ "page_id": 0,
93
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
94
+ "block_counts": [
95
+ [
96
+ "Span",
97
+ 3
98
+ ],
99
+ [
100
+ "Line",
101
+ 2
102
+ ],
103
+ [
104
+ "PageHeader",
105
+ 1
106
+ ],
107
+ [
108
+ "SectionHeader",
109
+ 1
110
+ ],
111
+ [
112
+ "PageFooter",
113
+ 1
114
+ ]
115
+ ],
116
+ "block_metadata": {
117
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
118
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
119
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
120
+ "previous_text": "",
121
+ "previous_type": "",
122
+ "previous_order": 0
123
+ }
124
+ },
125
+ {
126
+ "page_id": 1,
127
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
128
+ "block_counts": [
129
+ [
130
+ "Span",
131
+ 56
132
+ ],
133
+ [
134
+ "Line",
135
+ 25
136
+ ],
137
+ [
138
+ "Text",
139
+ 12
140
+ ],
141
+ [
142
+ "PageFooter",
143
+ 2
144
+ ],
145
+ [
146
+ "PageHeader",
147
+ 1
148
+ ],
149
+ [
150
+ "SectionHeader",
151
+ 1
152
+ ]
153
+ ],
154
+ "block_metadata": {
155
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
156
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
157
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
158
+ "previous_text": "",
159
+ "previous_type": "",
160
+ "previous_order": 0
161
+ }
162
+ },
163
+ {
164
+ "page_id": 2,
165
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
166
+ "block_counts": [
167
+ [
168
+ "Span",
169
+ 50
170
+ ],
171
+ [
172
+ "Line",
173
+ 24
174
+ ],
175
+ [
176
+ "ListGroup",
177
+ 3
178
+ ],
179
+ [
180
+ "Text",
181
+ 3
182
+ ],
183
+ [
184
+ "ListItem",
185
+ 3
186
+ ],
187
+ [
188
+ "PageFooter",
189
+ 2
190
+ ],
191
+ [
192
+ "PageHeader",
193
+ 1
194
+ ]
195
+ ],
196
+ "block_metadata": {
197
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
198
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
199
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
200
+ "previous_text": "",
201
+ "previous_type": "",
202
+ "previous_order": 0
203
+ }
204
+ },
205
+ {
206
+ "page_id": 3,
207
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
208
+ "block_counts": [
209
+ [
210
+ "Span",
211
+ 55
212
+ ],
213
+ [
214
+ "Line",
215
+ 25
216
+ ],
217
+ [
218
+ "Text",
219
+ 6
220
+ ],
221
+ [
222
+ "PageFooter",
223
+ 2
224
+ ],
225
+ [
226
+ "PageHeader",
227
+ 1
228
+ ]
229
+ ],
230
+ "block_metadata": {
231
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
232
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
233
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
234
+ "previous_text": "",
235
+ "previous_type": "",
236
+ "previous_order": 0
237
+ }
238
+ },
239
+ {
240
+ "page_id": 4,
241
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
242
+ "block_counts": [
243
+ [
244
+ "Span",
245
+ 51
246
+ ],
247
+ [
248
+ "Line",
249
+ 24
250
+ ],
251
+ [
252
+ "Text",
253
+ 9
254
+ ],
255
+ [
256
+ "PageFooter",
257
+ 2
258
+ ],
259
+ [
260
+ "PageHeader",
261
+ 1
262
+ ],
263
+ [
264
+ "SectionHeader",
265
+ 1
266
+ ]
267
+ ],
268
+ "block_metadata": {
269
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
270
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
271
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
272
+ "previous_text": "",
273
+ "previous_type": "",
274
+ "previous_order": 0
275
+ }
276
+ },
277
+ {
278
+ "page_id": 5,
279
+ "text_extraction_method": "surya",
280
+ "block_counts": [
281
+ [
282
+ "Span",
283
+ 36
284
+ ],
285
+ [
286
+ "Line",
287
+ 16
288
+ ],
289
+ [
290
+ "Text",
291
+ 10
292
+ ],
293
+ [
294
+ "PageFooter",
295
+ 4
296
+ ],
297
+ [
298
+ "PageHeader",
299
+ 2
300
+ ],
301
+ [
302
+ "Caption",
303
+ 1
304
+ ]
305
+ ],
306
+ "block_metadata": {
307
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
308
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
309
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
310
+ "previous_text": "",
311
+ "previous_type": "",
312
+ "previous_order": 0
313
+ }
314
+ }
315
+ ],
316
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02750874"
317
+ }
318
+ }
marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750880/EFTA02750880.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ KAPLAN HECKER FINK LLP
2
+
3
+ Direct Dial: (929) 294-0883
4
+
5
+ Direct Email: rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com
6
+
7
+ ## VIA ECF
8
+
9
+ The Honorable Katherine Polk Failla United States District Court Southern District of New York Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007
10
+
11
+ Re: Doe v. Indyke et al., No. I 9-cv-08673 (KPF)
12
+
13
+ Dear Judge Failla:
14
+
15
+ 350 Fifth Avenue
16
+
17
+ Suite 7110
18
+
19
+ New York, NY 10118
20
+
21
+ (212) 763.0883
22
+
23
+ www.kaplanhecker.com
24
+
25
+ October 15, 2019
26
+
27
+ We represent Plaintiff Jane Doe in the above-captioned action. In connection with our Motion for Leave to Proceed Under Pseudonym (ECF 3), we write to bring to the Court's attention a decision issued by Judge Castel in a related Epstein case granting the plaintiff's motion to proceed anonymously. A copy is attached hereto as Exhibit A. See Katlyn Doe v. Indyke et al., No. 19-cv-7771 (PKC) (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 12, 2019).
28
+
29
+ Respectfully submitted,
30
+
31
+ Roberta A. Kaplan
32
+
33
+ cc: Counsel of Record
marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750880/EFTA02750880.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750880.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 1,
15
+ "chars": 940,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 0.93,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "VIA ECF",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 77.00399999999999,
27
+ 215.952
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 131.55946350097656,
31
+ 215.952
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 131.55946350097656,
35
+ 230.7330322265625
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 77.00399999999999,
39
+ 230.7330322265625
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ }
43
+ ],
44
+ "page_stats": [
45
+ {
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
48
+ "block_counts": [
49
+ [
50
+ "Span",
51
+ 55
52
+ ],
53
+ [
54
+ "Line",
55
+ 28
56
+ ],
57
+ [
58
+ "Text",
59
+ 16
60
+ ],
61
+ [
62
+ "PageHeader",
63
+ 1
64
+ ],
65
+ [
66
+ "SectionHeader",
67
+ 1
68
+ ],
69
+ [
70
+ "Caption",
71
+ 1
72
+ ],
73
+ [
74
+ "PageFooter",
75
+ 1
76
+ ]
77
+ ],
78
+ "block_metadata": {
79
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
80
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
81
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
82
+ "previous_text": "",
83
+ "previous_type": "",
84
+ "previous_order": 0
85
+ }
86
+ }
87
+ ],
88
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02750880"
89
+ }
90
+ }
marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750881/EFTA02750881.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ Bennet J. Moskowitz
2
+
3
+ bennet.moskowitz@troutman.com
4
+
5
+ October 29, 2019
6
+
7
+ ECF
8
+
9
+ Hon. Katherine Polk Failla Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007
10
+
11
+ Re: Jane Doe v. Darren.. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, in their capacities as the Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, 1:19-cv-08673-KPF
12
+
13
+ Dear Judge Failla:
14
+
15
+ We represent Darren,. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (together, "Defendants"), in the referenced action. We write to clarify the record in response to Plaintiff's counsel's October 15, 2019 letter (ECF # 12) attaching a copy of an Order that the Hon. P. Kevin Castel issued in Katlyn Doe v. Darren.. indyke and Richard D. Kahn as Joint Personal Representatives of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, et al., 1:19-cv-0777. Specifically, Judge Castel issued the aforementioned Order ex parte, before our clients timely appeared in Katlyn Doe.
16
+
17
+ In accordance with Your Honor's Order dated October 7, 2019 (ECF #10), Defendants will respond to Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed Under Pseudonym (ECF #3) by November 15, 2019.
18
+
19
+ Thank you for your attention to this matter.
20
+
21
+ Respectfully submitted,
22
+
23
+ s/Bennet J. Moskowitz Bennet J. Moskowitz
marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750881/EFTA02750881.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750881.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 1,
15
+ "chars": 1221,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 0.77,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [],
20
+ "page_stats": [
21
+ {
22
+ "page_id": 0,
23
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
24
+ "block_counts": [
25
+ [
26
+ "Span",
27
+ 67
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ "Line",
31
+ 33
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ "Text",
35
+ 12
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ "PageHeader",
39
+ 4
40
+ ],
41
+ [
42
+ "PageFooter",
43
+ 1
44
+ ]
45
+ ],
46
+ "block_metadata": {
47
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
48
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
49
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
50
+ "previous_text": "",
51
+ "previous_type": "",
52
+ "previous_order": 0
53
+ }
54
+ }
55
+ ],
56
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02750881"
57
+ }
58
+ }
marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750882/EFTA02750882.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,426 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ # Exhibit A
2
+
3
+ # KAPLAN HECKER & FINK LLP
4
+
5
+ ## By Email:
6
+
7
+ Bennet J. Moskowitz Troutman Sanders LLP 785 Third Avenue New York, NY 10022 bennet.moskowitz@troutman.com
8
+
9
+ Andrew Tomback & Case LLP 1221 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10020 andrew.tomback(4)whitecase.com
10
+
11
+ Dear Bennet and Andy:
12
+
13
+ 350 FIFTH AVENUE I SUITE 7110
14
+
15
+ NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10118
16
+
17
+ TEL (212) 763-0863 FAX (212) 564-01385
18
+
19
+ WWW.KAPLANHECKER.COM
20
+
21
+ October 11, 2019
22
+
23
+ Re: Doe v. lndyke et al., No. 19-cv-8673-KPF (S.D.N.Y.)
24
+
25
+ We represent PlaintiffJane Doe in the above matter. We write in response to information we recently obtained regarding your client, Defendant Richard Kahn.
26
+
27
+ More specifically, on October 7, 2019, the Daily Mail reported that Mr. Kahn was present at Jeffrey Epstein's 71' Street townhouse for about 45 minutes one day after Mr. Epstein committed suicide, and that when he left the townhouse, he took with him a medium-sized blue shopping bag. See Louise Boyle, Exclusive: Executor ofJeffrey Epstein's Estate - Named in Lawsuit - Was Seen Removing a Bag of-Itemsfrom the Pedophile's Mansion the Day After his Suicide. . . And After Millionaire had Admitted to Having "Damaging" Din on High-Powered House Guests, DAILY MAIL (Oct. 7, 2019).
28
+
29
+ Please confirm whether this report is accurate. Is it true that Mr. Kahn entered Mr. Epstein's townhouse and removed documents? If so, we ask that you promptly (1) share with us a list of documents and/or materials Mr. Kahn removed from Mr. Epstein's townhouse that day and on any other occasion after Mr. Epstein's death and (2) confirm in writing that all documents and/or materials relevant to the matter are being retained and preserved pursuant to the requirements outlined in the enclosed notice.
30
+
31
+ We look forward to hearing from you as soon as possible.
32
+
33
+ Very truly yours,
34
+
35
+ cc: Daniel H. Weiner
36
+
37
+ Enclosure: Document Retention Notice
38
+
39
+ Roberta A. Kaplan s / KASM
40
+
41
+ # KAPLAN HECKER & FINK LLP
42
+
43
+ # By Email•
44
+
45
+ Bennet J. Moskowitz Troutman Sanders LLP 785 Third Avenue New York, NY 10022 bennet.moskowitz@troutman.com
46
+
47
+ Andrew Tomback & Case LLP 1221 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10020 andrew.tomback@whitecase.com
48
+
49
+ Daniel H. Weiner Hughes Hubbard & One Battery Park Plaza New York, NY 10004 daniel.weiner@hugheshubbard.com 350 FIFTH AVENUE I SUITE 7110 NEW YORK. NEW YORK 10118 TEL (212) 7630883 I FAX (212) 564-0883 WWW.KAPLANNECKER.COM
50
+
51
+ October 11, 2019
52
+
53
+ ### DOCUMENT RETENTION NOTICE DIRECTED TO THE ESTATE OF JEFFREY EPSTEIN
54
+
55
+ The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein ("You"), including executors Richard Kahn and Darren Indyke, is hereby put on formal notice of Your obligation to preserve all documents, electronically stored information, and tangible things under Your possession, custody, or control that are relevant to this action and/or have been, or are reasonably likely to be, requested during discovery. Your agents, officers, employees, and other persons under their authority and control are not permitted to destroy such materials either, and materials are "considered to be under a party's control when that party has the right, authority, or practical ability to obtain [them] from a non-party to the action." In re IVTL, Inc. Sec. Litig., 244 F.R.D. 179, 195 (S.D.N.Y. 2007).
56
+
57
+ The obligation to preserve relevant evidence covers all documents, electronically stored information, or tangible things in any form whatsoever, including, without limitation: writings; contracts; authorizations; business and financial records; inspections; notes; calendars; drafts; plans; drawings; charts; photographs; sound recordings; video recordings; images; emails; call
58
+
59
+ records; voicemails; instant messages; text messages; computer files; spreadsheets; data created by the use of banking, asset management, or financial software; all internet and web browser-generated history files, caches, and “cookies”; flash drives; hard drives; cellphones; and other data or data compilations stored in any medium from which information can be obtained.
60
+
61
+ Accordingly, the obligation requires You to suspend any destruction policies, including but not limited to the deletion of emails, instant messages, text messages, voicemails, and other electronic records, and take any and all measures necessary, including retaining archival documents in storage and backing up and/or mirroring electronic records and metadata, to ensure the retention of all materials that are relevant to this action, are reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence, or are reasonably likely to be requested during discovery. You must also refrain from causing, ordering, requesting, or suggesting that any third-party delete, alter or restrict access to any websites, social media accounts, or any other repositories containing information potentially relevant to this dispute.
62
+
63
+ Please also note that electronically stored information typically contains relevant discoverable information beyond what is apparent to the viewer, including, for example, embedded data and metadata. Therefore, it is necessary to preserve all electronically stored information in its original electronic form, even where paper copies might exist. Moreover, electronically stored information can be easily modified, deleted, or corrupted, and You are required to take all reasonable steps to ensure that all relevant, discoverable electronically stored information is preserved. Because modification, deletion, or corruption may result from automatic functions within the routine operation of an electronic information system, or from routine upgrades or recycling of computer-related hardware or software, Your preservation obligation includes, but is not limited to, the obligation to suspend any such operations, upgrades, or recycling features or protocols (including any document or data destruction policies) pending resolution of this action.
64
+
65
+ You should have already taken appropriate steps to preserve relevant materials. *See Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLC*, 220 F.R.D. 212, 218 (S.D.N.Y. 2003) (“Once a party reasonably anticipates litigation, it must suspend its routine document retention/destruction policy and put in place a ‘litigation hold’ to ensure the preservation of relevant documents.”). This includes, without limitation, any and all documents or other tangible materials at Mr. Epstein’s townhouse, as well as all of his other residences. It also covers any and all of Mr. Epstein’s computers, laptops, cell phones, smart phones, personal digital assistants and other devices, and the data stored therein.
66
+
67
+ Please confirm to us in writing as soon as feasible that You have implemented an appropriate litigation hold with respect to all appropriate individuals and entities, and please further confirm that You intend to abide by the preservation obligations set forth in this letter. Should you refuse or fail to provide such confirmation, we reserve all rights to seek appropriate relief.
68
+
69
+ Troutman Sanders LLP 875 Third Avenue New York, New York 10022
70
+
71
+ troutman.com
72
+
73
+ Bennet J. Moskowitz bennet.moskowitz©Iroutman.com
74
+
75
+ #### E-MAIL
76
+
77
+ October 22, 2019
78
+
79
+ Roberta A. Kaplan Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP 350 Fifth Avenue, Suite 7110 New York, NY 10118
80
+
81
+ ![](_page_5_Picture_3.jpeg)
82
+
83
+ Re: Jane Doe v. Darren K. lndyke and Richard D. Kahn, in their capacities as the Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, 1:19-cv-08673-KPF
84
+
85
+ Dear Roberta:
86
+
87
+ As you know, we represent Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, in their capacities as Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (together, "Defendants"), in the referenced action. We received your letter dated October 11, 2019 addressed to the undersigned and Andrew Tomback. We understand Mr. Tomback has addressed your questions about Mr. Kahn.
88
+
89
+ As for your "Document Retention Notice Directed to the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein," Defendants fully intend to satisfy their discovery obligations. However, your Notice unreasonably and impermissibly attempts to broaden Defendants' preservation obligations beyond those in applicable law. Your Notice is also otherwise unduly burdensome, overly broad, and not proportional to the needs of the above referenced case.
90
+
91
+ The foregoing is without prejudice to Defendants' rights and legal positions, all of which are hereby expressly preserved.
92
+
93
+ Very truly yours,
94
+
95
+ s/Bennet J. Moskowitz Bennet J. Moskowitz
96
+
97
+ ## Kyla Magun
98
+
99
+ From: Julie Fink Sent: Monday, October 28, 2019 6:27 PM To: Bennet.Moskowitz@troutman.com Cc: Roberta Kaplan; Kyla Magun Subject: FW: Letter from R. Kaplan
100
+
101
+ Dear Bennet:
102
+
103
+ Thank you for your email.
104
+
105
+ Per your request, we previously provided you with a list of topics for which we requested that you retain all categories of documents. We then asked that you confirm your agreement with these requests. However, your response does not confirm your agreement and whether your client will be retaining all documents related to these topics. We would appreciate an answer to that question promptly.
106
+
107
+ We are happy to discuss over the phone if you would prefer. If so, please let us know your availability to speak tomorrow morning.
108
+
109
+ Very truly yours,
110
+
111
+ Julie
112
+
113
+ Julie Fink I Kaplan Hecker & Fink I.I.P 35o Fifth Avenue I Suite 7110 New York, New York totif3 (W) 212.761.0885 I 00646.856.6431 Ifinkmkaplanheeker.com
114
+
115
+ From: Moskowitz, Bennet J. <Bennet.Moskowitz@troutman.com> Sent: Monday, October 28, 2019 8:30:57 AM To: Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com>; Kyla Magun <kmaeun@kaplanhecker.com> Subject: RE: Letter from R. Kaplan
116
+
117
+ Dear Roberta,
118
+
119
+ While we continue to seek to accommodate your requests for information, as a courtesy and not because there is any legal obligation to do so, many of your "topics" provided on October 23 assume facts and are argumentative (e.g., "Efforts by Epstein to provide attorneys to persons who recruited girls for him or provided sex-related services to him").
120
+
121
+ Moreover, you now demand information that implicates the attorney-client privilege and attorney work product doctrine. Accordingly, and while we will strive to be accommodating whenever possible — especially when, as we have informed you, the Estate is very close to establishing a claims administration process as an alternative to litigation- we decline to make any specific agreements or representations concerning your "topics."
122
+
123
+ To further allay any concerns you may have, we assure you nothing has changed in terms of preservation since before you first reached out to us about a news article that, to the extent you believe suggested
124
+
125
+ otherwise, was wrong. Further, and as we already advised, our clients take their preservation obligations seriously. There is therefore no urgency and, in turn, no justification for judicial intervention.
126
+
127
+ If you nevertheless insist on seeking the Courts intervention, then we should first meet and confer by phone so we can better understand the relief you would seek and legal and factual bases for it. We do not want to unnecessarily burden the Court.
128
+
129
+ Best regards,
130
+
131
+ Bennet
132
+
133
+ Bennet J. Moskowitz\*
134
+
135
+ troutmansanders
136
+
137
+ Direct: 212.704.6087
138
+
139
+ bennet.moskowitz©troutman.com
140
+
141
+ \*Licensed to practice law in New York and Connecticut
142
+
143
+ From: Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com>
144
+
145
+ Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2019 10:07 AM
146
+
147
+ To: Moskowitz, Bennet J. <Bennet.Moskowitz@troutman.com>; Kyla Magun ckmagun@kaplanhecker.com>
148
+
149
+ Subject: Re: Letter from R. Kaplan
150
+
151
+ #### EXTERNAL SENDER
152
+
153
+ Dear Bennet:
154
+
155
+ Safe travels. We will expect a response before noon on Monday. Presumably, you are already aware of the documents and other information that you are preserving.
156
+
157
+ Very truly yours,
158
+
159
+ Robbie
160
+
161
+ Roberta Kaplan
162
+
163
+ Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP
164
+
165
+ 350 Fifth Avenue suite 7110
166
+
167
+ New York, NY 10118
168
+
169
+ 212 763 0883
170
+
171
+ From: Moskowitz, Bennet J. <Bennet.Moskowitz@troutman.com>
172
+
173
+ Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2019 9:29 AM
174
+
175
+ To: Kyla Magun; Roberta Kaplan
176
+
177
+ Subject: Re: Letter from R. Kaplan
178
+
179
+ Hi Roberta,
180
+
181
+ I am traveling to Michigan today for an arbitration. However, we will be sure to get back to you by early next week.
182
+
183
+ Bennet J. Moskowitz\*
184
+
185
+ troutmansanders
186
+
187
+ Direct: 212.704.6087
188
+
189
+ bennet.moskowitz@troutman.com
190
+
191
+ \*Licensed to practice law in New York and Connecticut
192
+
193
+ On Oct 23, 2019, at 6:45 PM, Kyla Magun <kmagun@kaplanhecker.com> wrote:
194
+
195
+ #### EXTERNAL SENDER
196
+
197
+ #### ON BEHALF OF ROBERTA A. KAPLAN
198
+
199
+ Dear Bennet:
200
+
201
+ Thank you for your timely response. We write in response to the two aspects of our Document Retention Notice you have suggested are overly broad.
202
+
203
+ First, regarding timing, in our Complaint, we allege that our client met Epstein in or around 2002. (See, e.g., ECF 1 3.) Accordingly, we request that you apply our retention request to documents from 2002 to the present. As you know, there is no statute of limitations with respect to our alleged causes of action, so this timeline is perfectly reasonable.
204
+
205
+ Second, we request that you retain all categories of documents related to the following topics:
206
+
207
+ - Epstein's financial records, including those of any and all entities associated with Epstein and those listed among his assets in his will;
208
+ - Any and all statements or representations made by Epstein regarding his sexual pursuits;
209
+ - Any and all payments made by Epstein related to his sexual pursuits;
210
+ - Any and all criminal investigations of Epstein, including the Non-Prosecution Agreement entered into by Epstein in 2008 and the US Attorney's 2019 investigation into Epstein;
211
+ - All persons who recruited girls to service Epstein;
212
+ - All persons who provided sex-related services to Epstein from 2002 to the present;
213
+ - Efforts by Epstein to provide attorneys to persons who recruited girls for him or provided sex-related services to him;
214
+ - All properties owned by Epstein on the Upper East Side of Manhattan, including his 71" Street mansion;
215
+ - Any and all employees of properties owned by Epstein on the Upper East Side of Manhattan, including his 71" Street mansion;
216
+ - Epstein's travel;
217
+ - Dates Epstein was present in New York;
218
+ - •
219
+ - Lesley Groff; and,
220
+ - Epstein's last will and testament.
221
+
222
+ Please let us know within 48 hours whether you agree to these preservation requests. Given the sensitivity of this matter, if we do not hear from you within 48 hours, we will have no choice but to consider seeking the intervention of the Court. We reserve all rights.
223
+
224
+ Very truly yours,
225
+
226
+ Robbie
227
+
228
+ Kyla Magun I Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP
229
+
230
+ Associate 350 Fifth Avenue I Suite 7110 New York. New York 10118 (W) 929.469.28901(M) 646.784.4621 kinactin(dkaulanhecker.com
231
+
232
+ From: Moskowitz, Bennet J. <Bennet.Moskowitz@troutman.com>
233
+
234
+ Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2019 4:24 PM
235
+
236
+ To: Roberta Kaplan akaplan@kaplanhecker.com>
237
+
238
+ Cc: Kyla Magun <kmagun@kaplanhecker.com>
239
+
240
+ Subject: RE: Letter from R. Kaplan
241
+
242
+ Dear Roberta,
243
+
244
+ Happy to allay your concerns. Among other things, your Document Retention Notice in this action is (1) completely unlimited as to time and (2) ambiguous regarding the scope of subject matter your client contends should be preserved (see page 1, demanding preservation of all documents, ESI and tangible things that are relevant to the action or are "reasonably likely" to be requested during discovery).
245
+
246
+ As we previously advised you, Defendants are fully aware of their discovery obligations (including document preservation) and will comport themselves accordingly. We trust your client will do the same.
247
+
248
+ Best, Bennet
249
+
250
+ Bennet J. Moskowitz\*
251
+
252
+ troutmansanders
253
+
254
+ Direct: 212.704.6087
255
+
256
+ bennet.moskowitza.troutman.com
257
+
258
+ \*Licensed to practice law in New York and Connecticut
259
+
260
+ From: Kyla Magun <kmagun@kaplanhecker.com>
261
+
262
+ Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2019 2:57 PM
263
+
264
+ To: Moskowitz, Bennet J. <Bennet.Moskowitz@troutman.com>
265
+
266
+ Cc: Roberta Kaplan ekaplan@kaplanhecker.com>
267
+
268
+ Subject: RE: Letter from R. Kaplan
269
+
270
+ EXTERNAL SENDER
271
+
272
+ We have reviewed your letter dated October 22, 2019.
273
+
274
+ In that letter, you write that while you fully intend to satisfy your discovery obligations, our document retention notice attached to our letter to you dated October 11, 2019 somehow "unreasonably and impermissibly attempts to broaden Defendants' preservation obligations beyond those in applicable law."
275
+
276
+ In light of that response, we ask that you explain with reasonable specificity which components of our notice you find to be overly broad and whether there are particular requests in our October 11 letter or notice with which Defendants do not intend to comply. Again, please identify any such requests (including types of documents or other information as well as geographic/physical locations) with reasonable specificity so that we can actually understand what you are talking about.
277
+
278
+ Given the risks of spoliation due to the lack of clarity in your response, we ask that you respond within 48 hours.
279
+
280
+ Very truly yours,
281
+
282
+ Robbie
283
+
284
+ Kyla Magun I Kaplan Hecker & Fink LIP
285
+
286
+ Associate
287
+
288
+ 350 Fifth Avenue I Suite Tun
289
+
290
+ New York, New York ton8
291
+
292
+ (W) 929.469.2890 I (M) 646.784.4621
293
+
294
+ kmatt,un@kaplanhecker.com
295
+
296
+ From: Moskowitz, Bennet J. <Bennet.Moskowitz@troutman.com>
297
+
298
+ Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2019 11:12 AM
299
+
300
+ To: Kyla Magun <kmagun@kaplanhecker.com>
301
+
302
+ Cc: Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com>
303
+
304
+ Subject: RE: Letter from R. Kaplan
305
+
306
+ Please see the attached letter.
307
+
308
+ Best regards,
309
+
310
+ Bennet
311
+
312
+ Bennet J. Moskowitz\*
313
+
314
+ troutmansanderS
315
+
316
+ Direct: 212.704.6087
317
+
318
+ bennet.moskowitz@troutman.com
319
+
320
+ \*Licensed to practice law in New York and Connecticut
321
+
322
+ From: Kyle Magun <kmagun®kaplanhecker.com>
323
+
324
+ Sent: Friday, October 11, 2019 6:09 PM
325
+
326
+ To: Moskowitz, Bennett <Bennet.Moskowitz@troutman.com>
327
+
328
+ Cc: Roberta Kaplan <rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com>
329
+
330
+ Subject: Letter from R. Kaplan
331
+
332
+ ON BEHALF OF ROBERTA A. KAPLAN
333
+
334
+ Dear Bennet,
335
+
336
+ Attached, please find a letter relating to Doe v. Indyke et at, No. 19-cv-8673-KPF (S.D.N.Y.).
337
+
338
+ Thank you,
339
+
340
+ Robbie
341
+
342
+ Kyle Magun I Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP
343
+
344
+ Associate 35o Fifth Avenue I Suite 7110 New York, New York tou8 (W) 929469.2890 (M) 646.784.4621 kmagunkkaplanhecker.coin
345
+
346
+ This email and its attachments may contain information that is confidential and/or protected from disclosure by the attorney-client. work product or other applicable legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient of the email, please be aware that any unauthorized review. use. disclosure. dissemination, distfibution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the message from your computer system. Thank you.
347
+
348
+ This e-mail message (and any attachments) from Troutman Sanders LLP may contain legally privileged and confidential information solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you received this message in error, please delete the message and notify the sender. Any unauthorized reading, distribution, copying, or other use of this message (and attachments) is strictly prohibited.
349
+
350
+ This email and its attachments may contain information that is confidential and/or protected from disclosure by the attomey-client. work product or other applicable legal privilege. If you aro not the intended recipient of the email, please be aware that any unauthorized review. use, disclosure. dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the message from your computer system. Thank you.
351
+
352
+ This e-mail message (and any attachments) from Troutman Sanders LLP may contain legally privileged and confidential information solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you received this message in error, please delete the message and notify the sender. Any unauthorized reading, distribution, copying, or other use of this message (and attachments) is strictly prohibited.
353
+
354
+ This email and its attachments may contain information that is confidential and/or protected from disclosure by the attomey-client. work product or other applicable legal privilege. If you aro not the intended recipient of the email, please be aware that any unauthorized review. use. disclosure. dissemination. distribution, or copying of this communication, or any of its contents, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error. please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the message from your computer system. Thank you.
355
+
356
+ This e-mail message (and any attachments) from Troutman Sanders LLP may contain legally privileged and confidential information solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you received this message in error, please delete the message
357
+
358
+ This email and its attachments may contain information that is confidential and/or protected from disclosure by the attorney-client, work product or other applicable legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient of the email, please be aware that any unauthorized review, use. disclosure. dissemination. distribution. or copying of this communication. or any of its contents. is slimily prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of the message from your computer system. Thank you.
359
+
360
+ This e-mail message (and any attachments) from Troutman Sanders LLP may contain legally privileged and confidential information solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you received this message in error, please delete the message and notify the sender. Any unauthorized reading, distribution, copying, or other use of this message (and attachments) is strictly prohibited.
361
+
362
+ Bennet .1. Moskowitz bennet.moskowitz@troutman.com
363
+
364
+ October 28, 2019
365
+
366
+ #### E-MAIL
367
+
368
+ Roberta A. Kaplan Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP 350 Fifth Avenue, Suite 7110 New York, NY 10118
369
+
370
+ Re: Jane Doe v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, in their capacities as the Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, 1:19-cv-08673-KPF
371
+
372
+ Dear Roberta:
373
+
374
+ As you know, we represent Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (together, "Defendants"), in the referenced action (the "Action"). Without limiting or waiving your client Jane Doe's discovery obligations, we write to: (1) request immediate confirmation that your client has preserved all materials -- including without limitation hardcopy documents,' electronically stored information ("ESE') and tangible things -- relevant or potentially relevant to the subjects of Jane Doe's Complaint (ECF # 1); and (2) ensure Jane Doe continues to preserve such materials until the Action is fully concluded.
375
+
376
+ Such materials include, without limitation, all documents and communications2 within Jane Doe's possession, custody or control concerning (i.e., embodying, mentioning, or concerning, directly or indirectly) Jeffrey E. Epstein.
377
+
378
+ Please confirm in writing no later than November 4, 2019 that Jane Doe has preserved and will continue to preserve all documents and communications described above, and all other information relevant or potentially relevant to the subject matter of the Action.
379
+
380
+ This letter contains only non-exhaustive references to relevant and potentially relevant information and is without prejudice to Defendants' rights and legal positions, all of which are expressly reserved. Specifically, and without limitation, this letter shall in no way limit what Defendants may
381
+
382
+ <sup>&#</sup>x27;The term "document" is defined to be synonymous in meaning and equal in scope to the usage of the term "documents or electronically stored information" in Fed. R. Civ. P. 34(a)(1 )(A). A draft or non-identical copy is a separate document within the meaning of this term.
383
+
384
+ <sup>2</sup> The term "communication" means the transmittal of information (in the form of facts, ideas, inquiries or otherwise).
385
+
386
+ seek during discovery in the Action. It is essential that Jane Doe preserve -- and not alter, delete, discard, or otherwise destroy -- all information relevant or potentially relevant to the Action.
387
+
388
+ Very truly yours,
389
+
390
+ Bennet J. Moskowitz Bennet J. Moskowitz
391
+
392
+ KAPLAN HECKER & FINK LLP
393
+
394
+ 350 FIFTH AVENUE | SUITE 7110
395
+ NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10118
396
+ TEL (212) 763-0883 | FAX (212) 564-0883
397
+ WWW.KAPLANHECKER.COM
398
+
399
+ DIRECT DIAL 212.763.0883
400
+ DIRECT EMAIL rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com
401
+
402
+ October 29, 2019
403
+
404
+ **By Email:**
405
+
406
+ Bennet J. Moskowitz
407
+ Troutman Sanders LLP
408
+ 785 Third Avenue
409
+ New York, NY 10022
410
+ bennet.moskowitz@troutman.com
411
+
412
+ *Re: Doe v. Indyke et al., No. 19-cv-8673-KPF (S.D.N.Y.)*
413
+
414
+ Dear Counsel:
415
+
416
+ As you know, we represent Plaintiff Jane Doe in the above matter.
417
+
418
+ We write in response to your letter dated October 28, 2019. We can confirm that our client continues to abide by her discovery obligations and has preserved and will continue to preserve through the end of this matter all materials relevant to the subjects in her Complaint. It is worth noting, however, that our client's claims relate to crimes committed by Mr. Epstein **when our client was a child**—only 14 years old, 17 years ago.
419
+
420
+ But unlike our client, Mr. Epstein was an adult during the relevant period. We have repeatedly asked that you confirm with us that you are preserving Mr. Epstein's documents related to the specific topics relevant to our Complaint, which we listed for you in our email dated October 23, 2019. We still have not received a simple answer from you on this. As stated in our emails dated October 23, 24, and 28, 2019, you need to respond immediately. In any event, we continue to reserve all rights.
421
+
422
+ We look forward to hearing from you shortly.
423
+
424
+ Very truly yours,
425
+
426
+ ![]()Roberta A. Kaplan
marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750882/EFTA02750882.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,941 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750882.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 16,
15
+ "chars": 25452,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 12.62,
17
+ "image_assets": [
18
+ "_page_5_Picture_3.jpeg"
19
+ ],
20
+ "marker_metadata": {
21
+ "table_of_contents": [
22
+ {
23
+ "title": "Exhibit A",
24
+ "heading_level": null,
25
+ "page_id": 0,
26
+ "polygon": [
27
+ [
28
+ 200.73600000000002,
29
+ 329.29437255859375
30
+ ],
31
+ [
32
+ 417.6115417480469,
33
+ 329.29437255859375
34
+ ],
35
+ [
36
+ 417.6115417480469,
37
+ 379.772705078125
38
+ ],
39
+ [
40
+ 200.73600000000002,
41
+ 379.772705078125
42
+ ]
43
+ ]
44
+ },
45
+ {
46
+ "title": "KAPLAN HECKER & FINK LLP",
47
+ "heading_level": null,
48
+ "page_id": 1,
49
+ "polygon": [
50
+ [
51
+ 67.32000000000001,
52
+ 46.17
53
+ ],
54
+ [
55
+ 305.1478576660156,
56
+ 46.17
57
+ ],
58
+ [
59
+ 305.1478576660156,
60
+ 67.53924560546875
61
+ ],
62
+ [
63
+ 67.32000000000001,
64
+ 67.53924560546875
65
+ ]
66
+ ]
67
+ },
68
+ {
69
+ "title": "By Email:",
70
+ "heading_level": null,
71
+ "page_id": 1,
72
+ "polygon": [
73
+ [
74
+ 70.38,
75
+ 209.79000000000002
76
+ ],
77
+ [
78
+ 128.42349243164062,
79
+ 209.79000000000002
80
+ ],
81
+ [
82
+ 128.42349243164062,
83
+ 225.11248779296875
84
+ ],
85
+ [
86
+ 70.38,
87
+ 225.11248779296875
88
+ ]
89
+ ]
90
+ },
91
+ {
92
+ "title": "KAPLAN HECKER & FINK LLP",
93
+ "heading_level": null,
94
+ "page_id": 3,
95
+ "polygon": [
96
+ [
97
+ 68.544,
98
+ 46.17
99
+ ],
100
+ [
101
+ 305.8978576660156,
102
+ 46.17
103
+ ],
104
+ [
105
+ 305.8978576660156,
106
+ 67.91925048828125
107
+ ],
108
+ [
109
+ 68.544,
110
+ 67.91925048828125
111
+ ]
112
+ ]
113
+ },
114
+ {
115
+ "title": "By Email\u2022",
116
+ "heading_level": null,
117
+ "page_id": 3,
118
+ "polygon": [
119
+ [
120
+ 70.992,
121
+ 209.79000000000002
122
+ ],
123
+ [
124
+ 128.61561584472656,
125
+ 209.79000000000002
126
+ ],
127
+ [
128
+ 128.61561584472656,
129
+ 225.363037109375
130
+ ],
131
+ [
132
+ 70.992,
133
+ 225.363037109375
134
+ ]
135
+ ]
136
+ },
137
+ {
138
+ "title": "DOCUMENT RETENTION NOTICE DIRECTED TO THE ESTATE OF JEFFREY \nEPSTEIN",
139
+ "heading_level": null,
140
+ "page_id": 3,
141
+ "polygon": [
142
+ [
143
+ 84.456,
144
+ 494.09999999999997
145
+ ],
146
+ [
147
+ 527.3819580078125,
148
+ 494.09999999999997
149
+ ],
150
+ [
151
+ 527.3819580078125,
152
+ 523.863037109375
153
+ ],
154
+ [
155
+ 84.456,
156
+ 523.863037109375
157
+ ]
158
+ ]
159
+ },
160
+ {
161
+ "title": "E-MAIL",
162
+ "heading_level": null,
163
+ "page_id": 5,
164
+ "polygon": [
165
+ [
166
+ 68.544,
167
+ 179.01
168
+ ],
169
+ [
170
+ 112.97360229492188,
171
+ 179.01
172
+ ],
173
+ [
174
+ 112.97360229492188,
175
+ 192.68701171875
176
+ ],
177
+ [
178
+ 68.544,
179
+ 192.68701171875
180
+ ]
181
+ ]
182
+ },
183
+ {
184
+ "title": "Kyla Magun",
185
+ "heading_level": null,
186
+ "page_id": 6,
187
+ "polygon": [
188
+ [
189
+ 33.660000000000004,
190
+ 49.41
191
+ ],
192
+ [
193
+ 106.93527221679688,
194
+ 49.41
195
+ ],
196
+ [
197
+ 106.93527221679688,
198
+ 64.8170166015625
199
+ ],
200
+ [
201
+ 33.660000000000004,
202
+ 64.8170166015625
203
+ ]
204
+ ]
205
+ },
206
+ {
207
+ "title": "EXTERNAL SENDER",
208
+ "heading_level": null,
209
+ "page_id": 7,
210
+ "polygon": [
211
+ [
212
+ 33.048,
213
+ 357.21000000000004
214
+ ],
215
+ [
216
+ 132.4608154296875,
217
+ 357.21000000000004
218
+ ],
219
+ [
220
+ 132.4608154296875,
221
+ 371.83056640625
222
+ ],
223
+ [
224
+ 33.048,
225
+ 371.83056640625
226
+ ]
227
+ ]
228
+ },
229
+ {
230
+ "title": "EXTERNAL SENDER",
231
+ "heading_level": null,
232
+ "page_id": 8,
233
+ "polygon": [
234
+ [
235
+ 33.048,
236
+ 227.61
237
+ ],
238
+ [
239
+ 132.31814575195312,
240
+ 227.61
241
+ ],
242
+ [
243
+ 132.31814575195312,
244
+ 241.5841064453125
245
+ ],
246
+ [
247
+ 33.048,
248
+ 241.5841064453125
249
+ ]
250
+ ]
251
+ },
252
+ {
253
+ "title": "ON BEHALF OF ROBERTA A. KAPLAN",
254
+ "heading_level": null,
255
+ "page_id": 8,
256
+ "polygon": [
257
+ [
258
+ 33.048,
259
+ 253.53000000000003
260
+ ],
261
+ [
262
+ 203.49929809570312,
263
+ 253.53000000000003
264
+ ],
265
+ [
266
+ 203.49929809570312,
267
+ 267.4541015625
268
+ ],
269
+ [
270
+ 33.048,
271
+ 267.4541015625
272
+ ]
273
+ ]
274
+ },
275
+ {
276
+ "title": "EXTERNAL SENDER",
277
+ "heading_level": null,
278
+ "page_id": 11,
279
+ "polygon": [
280
+ [
281
+ 33.660000000000004,
282
+ 36.45
283
+ ],
284
+ [
285
+ 132.31814575195312,
286
+ 36.45
287
+ ],
288
+ [
289
+ 132.31814575195312,
290
+ 49.5841064453125
291
+ ],
292
+ [
293
+ 33.660000000000004,
294
+ 49.5841064453125
295
+ ]
296
+ ]
297
+ },
298
+ {
299
+ "title": "E-MAIL",
300
+ "heading_level": null,
301
+ "page_id": 13,
302
+ "polygon": [
303
+ [
304
+ 68.544,
305
+ 212.6702880859375
306
+ ],
307
+ [
308
+ 112.97360229492188,
309
+ 212.6702880859375
310
+ ],
311
+ [
312
+ 112.97360229492188,
313
+ 226.0670166015625
314
+ ],
315
+ [
316
+ 68.544,
317
+ 226.0670166015625
318
+ ]
319
+ ]
320
+ },
321
+ {
322
+ "title": "By Email:",
323
+ "heading_level": null,
324
+ "page_id": 15,
325
+ "polygon": [
326
+ [
327
+ 69.15599999999999,
328
+ 214.64999999999998
329
+ ],
330
+ [
331
+ 124.848,
332
+ 214.64999999999998
333
+ ],
334
+ [
335
+ 124.848,
336
+ 227.61
337
+ ],
338
+ [
339
+ 69.15599999999999,
340
+ 227.61
341
+ ]
342
+ ]
343
+ }
344
+ ],
345
+ "page_stats": [
346
+ {
347
+ "page_id": 0,
348
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
349
+ "block_counts": [
350
+ [
351
+ "Span",
352
+ 5
353
+ ],
354
+ [
355
+ "Line",
356
+ 3
357
+ ],
358
+ [
359
+ "PageHeader",
360
+ 1
361
+ ],
362
+ [
363
+ "SectionHeader",
364
+ 1
365
+ ],
366
+ [
367
+ "PageFooter",
368
+ 1
369
+ ]
370
+ ],
371
+ "block_metadata": {
372
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
373
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
374
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
375
+ "previous_text": "",
376
+ "previous_type": "",
377
+ "previous_order": 0
378
+ }
379
+ },
380
+ {
381
+ "page_id": 1,
382
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
383
+ "block_counts": [
384
+ [
385
+ "Span",
386
+ 71
387
+ ],
388
+ [
389
+ "Line",
390
+ 36
391
+ ],
392
+ [
393
+ "Text",
394
+ 14
395
+ ],
396
+ [
397
+ "SectionHeader",
398
+ 2
399
+ ],
400
+ [
401
+ "PageHeader",
402
+ 1
403
+ ],
404
+ [
405
+ "PageFooter",
406
+ 1
407
+ ]
408
+ ],
409
+ "block_metadata": {
410
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
411
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
412
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
413
+ "previous_text": "",
414
+ "previous_type": "",
415
+ "previous_order": 0
416
+ }
417
+ },
418
+ {
419
+ "page_id": 2,
420
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
421
+ "block_counts": [
422
+ [
423
+ "Span",
424
+ 17
425
+ ],
426
+ [
427
+ "Line",
428
+ 9
429
+ ],
430
+ [
431
+ "Text",
432
+ 5
433
+ ],
434
+ [
435
+ "PageFooter",
436
+ 2
437
+ ],
438
+ [
439
+ "PageHeader",
440
+ 1
441
+ ]
442
+ ],
443
+ "block_metadata": {
444
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
445
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
446
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
447
+ "previous_text": "",
448
+ "previous_type": "",
449
+ "previous_order": 0
450
+ }
451
+ },
452
+ {
453
+ "page_id": 3,
454
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
455
+ "block_counts": [
456
+ [
457
+ "Span",
458
+ 75
459
+ ],
460
+ [
461
+ "Line",
462
+ 38
463
+ ],
464
+ [
465
+ "Text",
466
+ 8
467
+ ],
468
+ [
469
+ "SectionHeader",
470
+ 3
471
+ ],
472
+ [
473
+ "PageHeader",
474
+ 1
475
+ ],
476
+ [
477
+ "PageFooter",
478
+ 1
479
+ ]
480
+ ],
481
+ "block_metadata": {
482
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
483
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
484
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
485
+ "previous_text": "",
486
+ "previous_type": "",
487
+ "previous_order": 0
488
+ }
489
+ },
490
+ {
491
+ "page_id": 4,
492
+ "text_extraction_method": "surya",
493
+ "block_counts": [
494
+ [
495
+ "Text",
496
+ 10
497
+ ],
498
+ [
499
+ "PageFooter",
500
+ 4
501
+ ],
502
+ [
503
+ "PageHeader",
504
+ 2
505
+ ]
506
+ ],
507
+ "block_metadata": {
508
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
509
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
510
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
511
+ "previous_text": "",
512
+ "previous_type": "",
513
+ "previous_order": 0
514
+ }
515
+ },
516
+ {
517
+ "page_id": 5,
518
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
519
+ "block_counts": [
520
+ [
521
+ "Span",
522
+ 66
523
+ ],
524
+ [
525
+ "Line",
526
+ 34
527
+ ],
528
+ [
529
+ "Text",
530
+ 12
531
+ ],
532
+ [
533
+ "PageFooter",
534
+ 2
535
+ ],
536
+ [
537
+ "PageHeader",
538
+ 1
539
+ ],
540
+ [
541
+ "Picture",
542
+ 1
543
+ ],
544
+ [
545
+ "SectionHeader",
546
+ 1
547
+ ]
548
+ ],
549
+ "block_metadata": {
550
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
551
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
552
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
553
+ "previous_text": "",
554
+ "previous_type": "",
555
+ "previous_order": 0
556
+ }
557
+ },
558
+ {
559
+ "page_id": 6,
560
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
561
+ "block_counts": [
562
+ [
563
+ "Span",
564
+ 81
565
+ ],
566
+ [
567
+ "Line",
568
+ 39
569
+ ],
570
+ [
571
+ "Text",
572
+ 13
573
+ ],
574
+ [
575
+ "PageFooter",
576
+ 2
577
+ ],
578
+ [
579
+ "PageHeader",
580
+ 1
581
+ ],
582
+ [
583
+ "SectionHeader",
584
+ 1
585
+ ]
586
+ ],
587
+ "block_metadata": {
588
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
589
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
590
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
591
+ "previous_text": "",
592
+ "previous_type": "",
593
+ "previous_order": 0
594
+ }
595
+ },
596
+ {
597
+ "page_id": 7,
598
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
599
+ "block_counts": [
600
+ [
601
+ "Span",
602
+ 77
603
+ ],
604
+ [
605
+ "Line",
606
+ 38
607
+ ],
608
+ [
609
+ "Text",
610
+ 29
611
+ ],
612
+ [
613
+ "PageFooter",
614
+ 2
615
+ ],
616
+ [
617
+ "PageHeader",
618
+ 1
619
+ ],
620
+ [
621
+ "SectionHeader",
622
+ 1
623
+ ]
624
+ ],
625
+ "block_metadata": {
626
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
627
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
628
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
629
+ "previous_text": "",
630
+ "previous_type": "",
631
+ "previous_order": 0
632
+ }
633
+ },
634
+ {
635
+ "page_id": 8,
636
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
637
+ "block_counts": [
638
+ [
639
+ "Span",
640
+ 81
641
+ ],
642
+ [
643
+ "Line",
644
+ 40
645
+ ],
646
+ [
647
+ "ListItem",
648
+ 14
649
+ ],
650
+ [
651
+ "Text",
652
+ 12
653
+ ],
654
+ [
655
+ "SectionHeader",
656
+ 2
657
+ ],
658
+ [
659
+ "PageFooter",
660
+ 2
661
+ ],
662
+ [
663
+ "PageHeader",
664
+ 1
665
+ ],
666
+ [
667
+ "ListGroup",
668
+ 1
669
+ ]
670
+ ],
671
+ "block_metadata": {
672
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
673
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
674
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
675
+ "previous_text": "",
676
+ "previous_type": "",
677
+ "previous_order": 0
678
+ }
679
+ },
680
+ {
681
+ "page_id": 9,
682
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
683
+ "block_counts": [
684
+ [
685
+ "Span",
686
+ 75
687
+ ],
688
+ [
689
+ "Line",
690
+ 38
691
+ ],
692
+ [
693
+ "Text",
694
+ 26
695
+ ],
696
+ [
697
+ "PageFooter",
698
+ 2
699
+ ],
700
+ [
701
+ "PageHeader",
702
+ 1
703
+ ]
704
+ ],
705
+ "block_metadata": {
706
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
707
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
708
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
709
+ "previous_text": "",
710
+ "previous_type": "",
711
+ "previous_order": 0
712
+ }
713
+ },
714
+ {
715
+ "page_id": 10,
716
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
717
+ "block_counts": [
718
+ [
719
+ "Span",
720
+ 79
721
+ ],
722
+ [
723
+ "Line",
724
+ 40
725
+ ],
726
+ [
727
+ "Text",
728
+ 31
729
+ ],
730
+ [
731
+ "PageFooter",
732
+ 2
733
+ ],
734
+ [
735
+ "PageHeader",
736
+ 1
737
+ ]
738
+ ],
739
+ "block_metadata": {
740
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
741
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
742
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
743
+ "previous_text": "",
744
+ "previous_type": "",
745
+ "previous_order": 0
746
+ }
747
+ },
748
+ {
749
+ "page_id": 11,
750
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
751
+ "block_counts": [
752
+ [
753
+ "Span",
754
+ 73
755
+ ],
756
+ [
757
+ "Line",
758
+ 37
759
+ ],
760
+ [
761
+ "Text",
762
+ 13
763
+ ],
764
+ [
765
+ "PageFooter",
766
+ 2
767
+ ],
768
+ [
769
+ "PageHeader",
770
+ 1
771
+ ],
772
+ [
773
+ "SectionHeader",
774
+ 1
775
+ ]
776
+ ],
777
+ "block_metadata": {
778
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
779
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
780
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
781
+ "previous_text": "",
782
+ "previous_type": "",
783
+ "previous_order": 0
784
+ }
785
+ },
786
+ {
787
+ "page_id": 12,
788
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
789
+ "block_counts": [
790
+ [
791
+ "Span",
792
+ 25
793
+ ],
794
+ [
795
+ "Line",
796
+ 13
797
+ ],
798
+ [
799
+ "Text",
800
+ 3
801
+ ],
802
+ [
803
+ "PageFooter",
804
+ 2
805
+ ],
806
+ [
807
+ "PageHeader",
808
+ 1
809
+ ]
810
+ ],
811
+ "block_metadata": {
812
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
813
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
814
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
815
+ "previous_text": "",
816
+ "previous_type": "",
817
+ "previous_order": 0
818
+ }
819
+ },
820
+ {
821
+ "page_id": 13,
822
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
823
+ "block_counts": [
824
+ [
825
+ "Span",
826
+ 85
827
+ ],
828
+ [
829
+ "Line",
830
+ 40
831
+ ],
832
+ [
833
+ "Text",
834
+ 9
835
+ ],
836
+ [
837
+ "PageHeader",
838
+ 4
839
+ ],
840
+ [
841
+ "Footnote",
842
+ 2
843
+ ],
844
+ [
845
+ "SectionHeader",
846
+ 1
847
+ ],
848
+ [
849
+ "PageFooter",
850
+ 1
851
+ ]
852
+ ],
853
+ "block_metadata": {
854
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
855
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
856
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
857
+ "previous_text": "",
858
+ "previous_type": "",
859
+ "previous_order": 0
860
+ }
861
+ },
862
+ {
863
+ "page_id": 14,
864
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
865
+ "block_counts": [
866
+ [
867
+ "Span",
868
+ 22
869
+ ],
870
+ [
871
+ "Line",
872
+ 11
873
+ ],
874
+ [
875
+ "PageHeader",
876
+ 3
877
+ ],
878
+ [
879
+ "Text",
880
+ 3
881
+ ],
882
+ [
883
+ "PageFooter",
884
+ 2
885
+ ]
886
+ ],
887
+ "block_metadata": {
888
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
889
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
890
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
891
+ "previous_text": "",
892
+ "previous_type": "",
893
+ "previous_order": 0
894
+ }
895
+ },
896
+ {
897
+ "page_id": 15,
898
+ "text_extraction_method": "surya",
899
+ "block_counts": [
900
+ [
901
+ "Span",
902
+ 69
903
+ ],
904
+ [
905
+ "Line",
906
+ 33
907
+ ],
908
+ [
909
+ "Text",
910
+ 25
911
+ ],
912
+ [
913
+ "SectionHeader",
914
+ 3
915
+ ],
916
+ [
917
+ "PageHeader",
918
+ 2
919
+ ],
920
+ [
921
+ "Caption",
922
+ 2
923
+ ],
924
+ [
925
+ "PageFooter",
926
+ 2
927
+ ]
928
+ ],
929
+ "block_metadata": {
930
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
931
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
932
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
933
+ "previous_text": "",
934
+ "previous_type": "",
935
+ "previous_order": 0
936
+ }
937
+ }
938
+ ],
939
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02750882"
940
+ }
941
+ }
marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750882/_page_5_Picture_3.jpeg ADDED

Git LFS Details

  • SHA256: 81a6fc6af32f5bd245ad46236e1f1db60368093d084b47b277c851c64587bdca
  • Pointer size: 129 Bytes
  • Size of remote file: 7.56 kB
marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750898/EFTA02750898.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ## KAPLAN HECKER & FINK LLP 350 FIFTH AVENUE I SUITE 7110
2
+
3
+ NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10118
4
+
5
+ TEL (212) 763-0883 I FAX (212) 564-0883
6
+
7
+ WWW.KAPLANHECKER.COM
8
+
9
+ October 31, 2019
10
+
11
+ ## VIA ECF
12
+
13
+ The Honorable Katherine Polk Failla United States District Court Southern District of New York Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007
14
+
15
+ Re: Doe v. Indyke et al., No. 19-cv-08673 (KPF)
16
+
17
+ Dear Judge Failla:
18
+
19
+ We represent Jane Doe in the above-captioned action.
20
+
21
+ We write in response to the letter dated October 29, 2019, from Bennet Moskowitz, counsel for Defendants, representatives of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein (ECF No. 13), in which Mr. Moskowitz argues that the Order that Judge Castel issued granting the plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed anonymously in Katlyn Doe v. Darren indyke and Richard D. Kahn as Joint Personal Representatives of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, et al.,1:19-cv-7771, was issued ex pane, prior to Defendants' appearance in that case. It is not clear to us why Defendants would object to Plaintiff, a childhood victim of sexual assault, proceeding pseudonymously in this case, particularly when so many other courts have granted motions to proceed under pseudonym in analogous circumstances. It is also worth noting that although Mr. Moskowitz had 14 days to seek reconsideration of Judge Castel's ruling pursuant to Rule 6.3 of the Local Rules, he failed to do so.
22
+
23
+ In addition, we would like to request a conference in this matter. Despite multiple rounds of email correspondence and an attempt to meet and confer, Defendants have failed to confirm that they are properly preserving relevant documents. See Ex. A (parties' correspondence). Although Defendants are not obligated to respond to the Complaint until November 15, 2019, given the risks
24
+
25
+ of spoliation, we respectfully request that the Court calendar a conference in which this issue can be discussed with the Court as soon as possible.
26
+
27
+ Respectfully submitted,
28
+
29
+ cc: Counsel of Record
30
+
31
+ Roberta A. Kaplan
marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750898/EFTA02750898.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,170 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750898.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 2,
15
+ "chars": 2018,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 0.82,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "KAPLAN HECKER & FINK LLP 350 FIFTH AVENUE I SUITE 7110",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 34.884,
27
+ 39.69
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 496.08642578125,
31
+ 39.69
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 496.08642578125,
35
+ 63.82122802734375
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 34.884,
39
+ 63.82122802734375
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "VIA ECF",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 69.768,
50
+ 236.51999999999998
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 124.91880798339844,
54
+ 236.51999999999998
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 124.91880798339844,
58
+ 251.73748779296875
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 69.768,
62
+ 251.73748779296875
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ },
66
+ {
67
+ "title": "KAPLAN HECKER FINK HP 2",
68
+ "heading_level": null,
69
+ "page_id": 1,
70
+ "polygon": [
71
+ [
72
+ 37.331999999999994,
73
+ 42.92999999999999
74
+ ],
75
+ [
76
+ 533.4800415039062,
77
+ 42.92999999999999
78
+ ],
79
+ [
80
+ 533.4800415039062,
81
+ 64.1080322265625
82
+ ],
83
+ [
84
+ 37.331999999999994,
85
+ 64.1080322265625
86
+ ]
87
+ ]
88
+ }
89
+ ],
90
+ "page_stats": [
91
+ {
92
+ "page_id": 0,
93
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
94
+ "block_counts": [
95
+ [
96
+ "Span",
97
+ 64
98
+ ],
99
+ [
100
+ "Line",
101
+ 32
102
+ ],
103
+ [
104
+ "Text",
105
+ 13
106
+ ],
107
+ [
108
+ "SectionHeader",
109
+ 2
110
+ ],
111
+ [
112
+ "PageHeader",
113
+ 1
114
+ ],
115
+ [
116
+ "PageFooter",
117
+ 1
118
+ ]
119
+ ],
120
+ "block_metadata": {
121
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
122
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
123
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
124
+ "previous_text": "",
125
+ "previous_type": "",
126
+ "previous_order": 0
127
+ }
128
+ },
129
+ {
130
+ "page_id": 1,
131
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
132
+ "block_counts": [
133
+ [
134
+ "Span",
135
+ 16
136
+ ],
137
+ [
138
+ "Line",
139
+ 8
140
+ ],
141
+ [
142
+ "Text",
143
+ 5
144
+ ],
145
+ [
146
+ "PageHeader",
147
+ 1
148
+ ],
149
+ [
150
+ "SectionHeader",
151
+ 1
152
+ ],
153
+ [
154
+ "PageFooter",
155
+ 1
156
+ ]
157
+ ],
158
+ "block_metadata": {
159
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
160
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
161
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
162
+ "previous_text": "",
163
+ "previous_type": "",
164
+ "previous_order": 0
165
+ }
166
+ }
167
+ ],
168
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02750898"
169
+ }
170
+ }
marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750900/EFTA02750900.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
2
+
3
+ JANE DOE,
4
+
5
+ v.
6
+
7
+ Case No. 19 Civ. 8673
8
+
9
+ DARREN INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, in their capacities as executors of the ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN,
10
+
11
+ Defendants.
12
+
13
+ ## NOTICE OF APPEARANCE
14
+
15
+ To the Clerk of this court and all parties of record:
16
+
17
+ Please enter my appearance as counsel in this case for Plaintiff Jane Doe. I certify that I am admitted to practice in this Court.
18
+
19
+ Dated: November 1, 2019 New York, New York
20
+
21
+ /s/ Kyla Magun
22
+
23
+ Kyla Magun
24
+
25
+ KAPLAN HECKER & FINK LLP
26
+
27
+ 350 Fifth Avenue, Suite 7110
28
+
29
+ New York, New York 10118
30
+
31
+ Telephone: (212) 763-0883
32
+
33
+ Facsimile: (212) 564-0883
34
+
35
+ kmagun@kaplanhecker.com
36
+
37
+ Counsel for Plaintiflane Doe
marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750900/EFTA02750900.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750900.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 1,
15
+ "chars": 693,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 1.14,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 193.392,
27
+ 71.28
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 418.5074768066406,
31
+ 71.28
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 418.5074768066406,
35
+ 100.10302734375
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 193.392,
39
+ 100.10302734375
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "NOTICE OF APPEARANCE",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 227.052,
50
+ 320.76
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 385.0557861328125,
54
+ 320.76
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 385.0557861328125,
58
+ 335.9830322265625
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 227.052,
62
+ 335.9830322265625
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ }
66
+ ],
67
+ "page_stats": [
68
+ {
69
+ "page_id": 0,
70
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
71
+ "block_counts": [
72
+ [
73
+ "Span",
74
+ 55
75
+ ],
76
+ [
77
+ "Line",
78
+ 27
79
+ ],
80
+ [
81
+ "Text",
82
+ 18
83
+ ],
84
+ [
85
+ "SectionHeader",
86
+ 2
87
+ ],
88
+ [
89
+ "PageFooter",
90
+ 2
91
+ ],
92
+ [
93
+ "PageHeader",
94
+ 1
95
+ ]
96
+ ],
97
+ "block_metadata": {
98
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
99
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
100
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
101
+ "previous_text": "",
102
+ "previous_type": "",
103
+ "previous_order": 0
104
+ }
105
+ }
106
+ ],
107
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02750900"
108
+ }
109
+ }
marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750901/EFTA02750901.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ## KAPLAN HECKER & FINK LLP
2
+
3
+ ## VIA ECF
4
+
5
+ The Honorable Katherine Polk Failla United States District Court Southern District of New York Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007
6
+
7
+ NEW VORK, NEW YORK 10118
8
+
9
+ TEL (212) 763-0883 I FAX (212) 564-0883
10
+
11
+ WWW.KAPLANHECKER.COM
12
+
13
+ DIRECT DIAL 212.7610885
14
+
15
+ DIRECT EMAIL jfink@kaplanhecker.com
16
+
17
+ November 1, 2019
18
+
19
+ Re: VE v. Nine East 7 hiStreet et aL, No. 19-cv-07625 (S.D.N.Y.) (Nathan, J.); Doe I et aL V. Jeffrey Epstein et aL, No. 19-cv-07675 (S.D.N.Y) (Daniels, J.); Doe v. Darren K Indyke et aL, No. 19-cv-07771 (S.D.N.Y.) (Castel, J.); Doe v. Darren K. Indyke et at, No. 19-cv-07772 (S.D.N.Y.) (Carter, J.); Doe v. Darren K Indyke et at, No. 19-cv-07773 (S.D.N.Y.) (Ramos, J.); Doe v. Indyke et. aL, No. 19-cv-08673 (S.D.N.Y.) (Failla, J.).
20
+
21
+ Dear Judge Failla:
22
+
23
+ We represent PlaintiffJane Doe in Doe v. Indyke et. aL, No. 19-cv-08673 a case against the estate of Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"). We write to request that the Court mark the six above-captioned actions as related and assigned to a single judge pursuant to Rule 13 of the Rules for the Division of Business Among District Judges in the Southern District ("Rule 13").
24
+
25
+ Rule 13 permits the Court to designate cases as related when the interests of justice and efficiency will be served. Here, the interests of justice and efficiency will be served by designating the aboveentitled actions as related because: (1) the actions concern the same or substantially similar parties and events; (2) there is substantial factual overlap; and (3) there would be substantial duplication of effort and expense for both the Court and the parties absent a determination of relatedness. See Rule 13(a); see also Poindexter V. Cash Money Records, No. I3-cv-5882, 2014 WL 1383781, at '2 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 8, 2014).
26
+
27
+ More specifically, in each of these actions, plaintiffs bring claims against the Epstein estate relating to Epstein's systemic abuse of vulnerable, young girls or women. While the facts vary slightly with respect to each plaintiff, the overall alleged pattern is the same in every case: Epstein lured the young women to his home, where he exploited and sexually assaulted them for his own sexual pleasure.
28
+
29
+ As a result, many of the issues related to pre-trial litigation in these actions will be the same, and the Court and the parties will benefit from the efficiency of having one judge consider and rule upon the discovery and other pre-trial issues that will inevitably arise. Indeed, the need for uniformity and consistency is arguably even more pronounced here given the complexity of issues surrounding Epstein's estate (being probated in St. [REDACTED]) and concerns that plaintiffs have regarding document preservation. *See Louise Boyle, Exclusive: Executor of Jeffrey Epstein's Estate – Named in Lawsuit – Was Seen Removing a Bag of Items from the Pedophile's Mansion the Day After his Suicide. . . And After Millionaire had Admitted to Having "Damaging" Dirt on High-Powered House Guests*, DAILY MAIL. (Oct. 7, 2019).
30
+
31
+ Thank you for your consideration of this request. We copy on this letter all the Southern District of New York Judges currently assigned to these cases, the Chief Judge of the Southern District, and counsel in the other related cases.
32
+
33
+ ![]()cc: Counsel of Record
34
+ The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
35
+ The Honorable [REDACTED] B. Daniels
36
+ The Honorable P. Kevin Castel
37
+ The Honorable Andrew L. Carter
38
+ The Honorable Edgardo Ramos
39
+ The Honorable Colleen McMahon
40
+ Arick W. Fudali, Esq.
41
+ [REDACTED] James [REDACTED], Esq.
42
+ Brittany [REDACTED], Esq.
43
+ John Pottinger, Esq.
marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750901/EFTA02750901.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,139 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750901.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 2,
15
+ "chars": 3634,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 5.59,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "KAPLAN HECKER & FINK LLP",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 34.941,
27
+ 37.352
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 311.5762634277344,
31
+ 37.352
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 311.5762634277344,
35
+ 62.4361572265625
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 34.941,
39
+ 62.4361572265625
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "VIA ECF",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 70.49499999999999,
50
+ 233.85599999999997
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 122.84521484375,
54
+ 233.85599999999997
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 122.84521484375,
58
+ 248.68701171875
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 70.49499999999999,
62
+ 248.68701171875
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ }
66
+ ],
67
+ "page_stats": [
68
+ {
69
+ "page_id": 0,
70
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
71
+ "block_counts": [
72
+ [
73
+ "Span",
74
+ 78
75
+ ],
76
+ [
77
+ "Line",
78
+ 38
79
+ ],
80
+ [
81
+ "Text",
82
+ 13
83
+ ],
84
+ [
85
+ "SectionHeader",
86
+ 2
87
+ ],
88
+ [
89
+ "PageHeader",
90
+ 1
91
+ ],
92
+ [
93
+ "PageFooter",
94
+ 1
95
+ ]
96
+ ],
97
+ "block_metadata": {
98
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
99
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
100
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
101
+ "previous_text": "",
102
+ "previous_type": "",
103
+ "previous_order": 0
104
+ }
105
+ },
106
+ {
107
+ "page_id": 1,
108
+ "text_extraction_method": "surya",
109
+ "block_counts": [
110
+ [
111
+ "Text",
112
+ 10
113
+ ],
114
+ [
115
+ "PageHeader",
116
+ 3
117
+ ],
118
+ [
119
+ "PageFooter",
120
+ 2
121
+ ],
122
+ [
123
+ "SectionHeader",
124
+ 1
125
+ ]
126
+ ],
127
+ "block_metadata": {
128
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
129
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
130
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
131
+ "previous_text": "",
132
+ "previous_type": "",
133
+ "previous_order": 0
134
+ }
135
+ }
136
+ ],
137
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02750901"
138
+ }
139
+ }
marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750903/EFTA02750903.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ## KAPLAN HECKER & FINK LLP
2
+
3
+ MEMO ENDORSED
4
+
5
+ NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10118
6
+
7
+ TEL (212) 763-0883 I FAX (212) 564-0883
8
+
9
+ WWW.KAPLANHECKER.COM
10
+
11
+ October 31, 2019
12
+
13
+ ## VIA ECF
14
+
15
+ The Honorable Katherine Polk Failla United States District Court Southern District of New York Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007
16
+
17
+ Re: Doe v. Indyke et aL, No. 19-cv-08673 (KPF)
18
+
19
+ Dear Judge Failla:
20
+
21
+ We represent Jane Doe in the above-captioned action.
22
+
23
+ We write in response to the letter dated October 29, 2019, from Bennet Moskowitz, counsel for Defendants, representatives of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein (ECF No. 13), in which Mr. Moskowitz argues that the Order that Judge Castel issued granting the plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed anonymously in Katlyn Doe v. Darren Indyke and Richard D. Kahn as Joint Personal Representatives of the Estate ofJefIrey E. Epstein, et aL, 1:19-cv-7771, was issued ex pane, prior to Defendants' appearance in that case. It is not clear to us why Defendants would object to Plaintiff, a childhood victim of sexual assault, proceeding pseudonymously in this case, particularly when so many other courts have granted motions to proceed under pseudonym in analogous circumstances. It is also worth noting that although Mr. Moskowitz had 14 days to seek reconsideration of Judge Castel's ruling pursuant to Rule 6.3 of the Local Rules, he failed to do so.
24
+
25
+ In addition, we would like to request a conference in this matter. Despite multiple rounds of email correspondence and an attempt to meet and confer, Defendants have failed to confirm that they are properly preserving relevant documents. See Ex. A (parties' correspondence). Although Defendants are not obligated to respond to the Complaint until November 15, 2019, given the risks
26
+
27
+ of spoliation, we respectfully request that the Court calendar a conference in which this issue can be discussed with the Court as soon as possible.
28
+
29
+ Respectfully submitted,
30
+
31
+ ![]()Roberta A. Kaplan
32
+
33
+ cc: Counsel of Record
34
+
35
+ Application GRANTED. The parties are hereby ORDERED to appear for a conference on **November 7, 2019, at 10:00 a.m.** in Courtroom 618 of the Thurgood Marshall Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, New York, NY.
36
+
37
+ Dated: November 1, 2019
38
+ New York, New York
39
+
40
+ SO ORDERED.
41
+
42
+ ![]()HON. KATHERINE POLK FAILLA
43
+ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750903/EFTA02750903.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,151 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750903.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 2,
15
+ "chars": 2333,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 3.57,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "KAPLAN HECKER & FINK LLP",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 34.884,
27
+ 39.69
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 310.45587158203125,
31
+ 39.69
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 310.45587158203125,
35
+ 63.82122802734375
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 34.884,
39
+ 63.82122802734375
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "VIA ECF",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 69.15599999999999,
50
+ 235.70999999999998
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 124.91880798339844,
54
+ 235.70999999999998
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 124.91880798339844,
58
+ 251.73748779296875
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 69.15599999999999,
62
+ 251.73748779296875
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ }
66
+ ],
67
+ "page_stats": [
68
+ {
69
+ "page_id": 0,
70
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
71
+ "block_counts": [
72
+ [
73
+ "Span",
74
+ 67
75
+ ],
76
+ [
77
+ "Line",
78
+ 34
79
+ ],
80
+ [
81
+ "Text",
82
+ 14
83
+ ],
84
+ [
85
+ "SectionHeader",
86
+ 2
87
+ ],
88
+ [
89
+ "PageHeader",
90
+ 1
91
+ ],
92
+ [
93
+ "PageFooter",
94
+ 1
95
+ ]
96
+ ],
97
+ "block_metadata": {
98
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
99
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
100
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
101
+ "previous_text": "",
102
+ "previous_type": "",
103
+ "previous_order": 0
104
+ }
105
+ },
106
+ {
107
+ "page_id": 1,
108
+ "text_extraction_method": "surya",
109
+ "block_counts": [
110
+ [
111
+ "Span",
112
+ 32
113
+ ],
114
+ [
115
+ "Text",
116
+ 20
117
+ ],
118
+ [
119
+ "Line",
120
+ 16
121
+ ],
122
+ [
123
+ "PageHeader",
124
+ 2
125
+ ],
126
+ [
127
+ "PageFooter",
128
+ 2
129
+ ],
130
+ [
131
+ "Caption",
132
+ 2
133
+ ],
134
+ [
135
+ "SectionHeader",
136
+ 1
137
+ ]
138
+ ],
139
+ "block_metadata": {
140
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
141
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
142
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
143
+ "previous_text": "",
144
+ "previous_type": "",
145
+ "previous_order": 0
146
+ }
147
+ }
148
+ ],
149
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02750903"
150
+ }
151
+ }
marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750905/EFTA02750905.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ KAPLAN HECKER & FINK LLP
2
+
3
+ 350 FIFTH AVENUE | SUITE 7110
4
+ NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10118
5
+ TEL (212) 763-0883 | FAX (212) 564-0883
6
+ WWW.KAPLANHECKER.COM
7
+
8
+ DIRECT DIAL 212.763.0885
9
+ DIRECT EMAIL jfink@kaplanhecker.com
10
+
11
+ November 5, 2019
12
+
13
+ **VIA ECF**
14
+
15
+ The Honorable Katherine Polk Failla
16
+ United States District Court
17
+ Southern District of New York
18
+ Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse
19
+ 40 Foley Square
20
+ New York, NY 10007
21
+
22
+ *Re: Doe 17 v. Indyke et al.*, No. 19-cv-9610 (Engelmayer, J.)
23
+
24
+ Dear Judge Failla:
25
+
26
+ We represent Plaintiff Jane Doe in *Doe v. Indyke et. al.*, No. 19-cv-08673. We write to supplement our November 1, 2019 Letter to the Court (ECF 16), in which we requested that the Court mark the following cases as related and assigned to a single judge: *VE v. Nine East 71st Street et al.*, No. 19-cv-07625 (S.D.N.Y.) (Nathan, J.); *Doe I et al. v. Jeffrey Epstein et al.*, No. 19-cv-07675 (S.D.N.Y.) (Daniels, J.); *Doe v. Darren K. Indyke et al.*, No. 19-cv-07771 (S.D.N.Y.) (Castel, J.); *Doe v. Darren K. Indyke et al.*, No. 19-cv-07772 (S.D.N.Y.) (Carter, J.); *Doe v. Darren K. Indyke et al.*, No. 19-cv-07773 (S.D.N.Y.) (Ramos, J.); and, *Doe v. Indyke et. al.*, No. 19-cv-08673 (S.D.N.Y.) (Failla, J.).
27
+
28
+ It has come to our attention that an additional case, *Doe 17 v. Indyke et al.*, No. 19-cv-9610 (S.D.N.Y.) (Engelmayer, J.), concerns similar parties and substantial factual overlap with the aforementioned cases. Therefore, we request that it too be marked as related.
29
+
30
+ Thank you for your consideration of this request. We copy on this letter all the Southern District of New York Judges currently assigned to these cases, the Chief Judge of the Southern District, and counsel in the other related cases.
31
+
32
+ Respectfully submitted.
33
+
34
+ ![]()cc: Counsel of Record
35
+
36
+ The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
37
+
38
+ The Honorable [REDACTED] B. Daniels
39
+
40
+ The Honorable P. Kevin Castel
41
+
42
+ The Honorable Andrew L. Carter
43
+
44
+ The Honorable Edgardo Ramos
45
+
46
+ The Honorable Paul A. Engelmayer
47
+
48
+ The Honorable Colleen McMahon
49
+
50
+ Arick W. Fudali, Esq.
51
+
52
+ [REDACTED] James [REDACTED], Esq.
53
+
54
+ Brittany [REDACTED], Esq.
55
+
56
+ John Pottinger, Esq.
57
+
58
+ David H. Brodie Esq.
59
+
60
+ Laura Jane Starr Esq.
61
+
62
+ Andrew Scott Buzin Esq.
marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750905/EFTA02750905.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,139 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750905.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 2,
15
+ "chars": 2187,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 6.69,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "KAPLAN HECKER & FINK LLP",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 36.779999999999994,
27
+ 38.976
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 308.952,
31
+ 38.976
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 308.952,
35
+ 58.46399999999999
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 36.779999999999994,
39
+ 58.46399999999999
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "VIA ECF",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 71.72099999999999,
50
+ 235.47999999999996
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 121.37400000000001,
54
+ 235.47999999999996
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 121.37400000000001,
58
+ 248.47199999999998
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 71.72099999999999,
62
+ 248.47199999999998
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ }
66
+ ],
67
+ "page_stats": [
68
+ {
69
+ "page_id": 0,
70
+ "text_extraction_method": "surya",
71
+ "block_counts": [
72
+ [
73
+ "Span",
74
+ 65
75
+ ],
76
+ [
77
+ "Line",
78
+ 32
79
+ ],
80
+ [
81
+ "Text",
82
+ 27
83
+ ],
84
+ [
85
+ "SectionHeader",
86
+ 4
87
+ ],
88
+ [
89
+ "PageHeader",
90
+ 2
91
+ ],
92
+ [
93
+ "PageFooter",
94
+ 2
95
+ ]
96
+ ],
97
+ "block_metadata": {
98
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
99
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
100
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
101
+ "previous_text": "",
102
+ "previous_type": "",
103
+ "previous_order": 0
104
+ }
105
+ },
106
+ {
107
+ "page_id": 1,
108
+ "text_extraction_method": "surya",
109
+ "block_counts": [
110
+ [
111
+ "Text",
112
+ 32
113
+ ],
114
+ [
115
+ "PageHeader",
116
+ 3
117
+ ],
118
+ [
119
+ "PageFooter",
120
+ 2
121
+ ],
122
+ [
123
+ "SectionHeader",
124
+ 1
125
+ ]
126
+ ],
127
+ "block_metadata": {
128
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
129
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
130
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
131
+ "previous_text": "",
132
+ "previous_type": "",
133
+ "previous_order": 0
134
+ }
135
+ }
136
+ ],
137
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02750905"
138
+ }
139
+ }
marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750907/EFTA02750907.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ Bennet J. Moskowitz bennet.moskowitz@troutman.com
2
+
3
+ November 5, 2019
4
+
5
+ ECF
6
+
7
+ Hon. Katherine Polk Failla Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007
8
+
9
+ Re: Jane Doe v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, in their capacities as the Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, 1:19-cv-08673-KPF
10
+
11
+ Dear Judge Failla:
12
+
13
+ We represent Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (together, "Defendants"), in the referenced action. We write in response to Plaintiff's counsel's November 1, 2019 letter (ECF # 16), which Ms. Fink submitted without first meeting and conferring with us, requesting the Court mark this and five other S.D.N.Y. actions pending before five different judges' related and assigned to a single judge.
14
+
15
+ If approved, Plaintiff's request would have serious consequences for this and the other subject actions and parties thereto. Accordingly, we respectfully request that Defendants and all other parties to the actions—which so far include 7 different plaintiffs and 20 different defendants have thirty (30) days to respond to Plaintiff's request. That time would permit the various parties to the lawsuits to meet and confer regarding potential consolidation, thereby conserving judicial resources by reducing or eliminating the issues in dispute. The requested time would also provide the parties sufficient time to otherwise respond to Plaintiff's request.
16
+
17
+ <sup>&#</sup>x27; See VE v. Nine East 71st Street, et at, 1:19-cv-07625 (AJN); Jane Doe 1 and 2 v. Estate of Jeffrey Epstein, et at, 1:19-cv-07675 (GBD); Katlyn Doe v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn as Joint Personal Representatives of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, et al., 1:19-cv-07771 ( PKC); Priscilla Doe v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn as Joint Personal Representatives of The Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, et at, 1:19-cv-07772 (ALC); and Lisa Doe v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn as Joint Personal Representatives of The Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, et at, 1:19-cv-07773 (ER).
18
+
19
+ Respectfully submitted,
20
+
21
+ s/Bennet J. Moskowitz
22
+
23
+ Bennet J. Moskowitz
24
+
25
+ Cc: The Honorable Colleen McMahon
26
+
27
+ The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
28
+
29
+ The Honorable B. Daniels
30
+
31
+ The Honorable P. Kevin Castel
32
+
33
+ The Honorable Andrew L. Carter
34
+
35
+ The Honorable Edgardo Ramos
36
+
37
+ iA l( VV. Fudali E
38
+
39
+ m , Esq.
40
+
41
+ Brittany , Esq.
42
+
43
+ Stan Pottnger, Esq.
marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750907/EFTA02750907.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750907.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 2,
15
+ "chars": 2382,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 1.03,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [],
20
+ "page_stats": [
21
+ {
22
+ "page_id": 0,
23
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
24
+ "block_counts": [
25
+ [
26
+ "Span",
27
+ 77
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ "Line",
31
+ 38
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ "Text",
35
+ 8
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ "PageHeader",
39
+ 4
40
+ ],
41
+ [
42
+ "Footnote",
43
+ 1
44
+ ],
45
+ [
46
+ "PageFooter",
47
+ 1
48
+ ]
49
+ ],
50
+ "block_metadata": {
51
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
52
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
53
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
54
+ "previous_text": "",
55
+ "previous_type": "",
56
+ "previous_order": 0
57
+ }
58
+ },
59
+ {
60
+ "page_id": 1,
61
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
62
+ "block_counts": [
63
+ [
64
+ "Span",
65
+ 44
66
+ ],
67
+ [
68
+ "Line",
69
+ 20
70
+ ],
71
+ [
72
+ "Text",
73
+ 13
74
+ ],
75
+ [
76
+ "PageHeader",
77
+ 7
78
+ ],
79
+ [
80
+ "PageFooter",
81
+ 2
82
+ ]
83
+ ],
84
+ "block_metadata": {
85
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
86
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
87
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
88
+ "previous_text": "",
89
+ "previous_type": "",
90
+ "previous_order": 0
91
+ }
92
+ }
93
+ ],
94
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02750907"
95
+ }
96
+ }
marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750909/EFTA02750909.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ Bennet J. Moskowitz bennelmoskowitz@troutman.com
2
+
3
+ November 5, 2019
4
+
5
+ ECF
6
+
7
+ Hon. Katherine Polk Failla Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007
8
+
9
+ Re: Jane Doe v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, in their capacities as the Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, 1:19-cv-08673-KPF
10
+
11
+ Dear Judge Failla:
12
+
13
+ We represent Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (together, "Defendants"), in the referenced action. In accordance with Your Honor's Individual Rules of Practice in Civil Cases § 2(c) (providing 3 business days for parties to respond to letter motions), we write in response to Plaintiff's counsel's October 31, 2019 letter motion (ECF # 14) which they submitted without first meeting and conferring with us as we requested. Plaintiff's counsel: (i) requests an unnecessary court conference to discuss "risks of spoliation" based on a U.K. tabloid article that we already advised Plaintiff's counsel is, to the extent it suggests spoliation has occurred, false; and (ii) misstates Defendants' position on Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed Under Pseudonym (ECF# 3) and even though Plaintiff agreed, and the Court So Ordered, Defendants have until November 15, 2019 to respond to the Motion (See ECF# 10).
14
+
15
+ On October 22, 2019, Plaintiff's counsel, Roberta Kaplan, citing a U.K. tabloid article implying one of the Co-Executors improperly removed materials in a bag from the decedent's property in Manhattan, asked us to confirm the tabloid's accuracy. An attorney for the Co-Executor promptly called Ms. Kaplan and explained to her that the tabloid article, to the extent it suggested spoliation, was wrong. The Co-Executor's attorney also specifically explained to Ms. Kaplan that the subject bag did not contain documents or any other materials relevant to this case. In fact, the Co-Executor referenced in the tabloid article was carrying a bag of decedent's clothing for purposes of laying decedent to rest.
16
+
17
+ We have also advised Ms. Kaplan on multiple occasions, including in writing, that the Co-Executors are abiding by their discovery obligations. However, after we addressed the tabloid article and further confirmed Defendants' adherence to their discovery obligations, Ms. Kaplan then demanded we confirm Defendants are preserving various categories of documents that Ms. Kaplan labeled "topics." Many of the so-called topics are argumentative, assume facts that have not been proven and implicate information protected by the attorney-client privilege and attorney work product doctrine. Ms. Kaplan failed to cite to us or the Court any legal authority supporting her demands, and we are not aware of any such authority.
18
+
19
+ Despite being at an arbitration hearing in Southfield, Michigan (which Ms. Kaplan was aware of) and despite Ms. Kaplan's failure to cite any legal bases for her premature demands, we asked Ms. Kaplan to meet and confer with us by phone if she still insisted on seeking Court intervention regarding these issues, so we could better understand the basis of her position. Instead, Plaintiff's counsel submitted their Letter Motion to the Court last Thursday.
20
+
21
+ Given Defendants' confirmation that they are abiding by their preservation obligations, and in light of Ms. Kaplan's failure to provide any support (beyond an erroneous tabloid article) for her speculative allegations of spoliation, we respectfully submit it is premature to address any discovery issues at this very early stage of this case—Defendants have until November 15, 2019 to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint and the Initial pre-trial conference is scheduled for December 13, 2019.
22
+
23
+ Finally, Ms. Kaplan incorrectly asserts that Defendants object to Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed Under Pseudonym. To the contrary, and as we will further explain in Defendants' response brief due per the Court's Order on November 15, 2019, Defendants have no objection to Plaintiff's desire to prevent the public from discovering her identity. We never suggested otherwise to Ms. Kaplan. Defendants do intend to brief their position on anonymity so they are not, subject to measures preventing such public disclosure, deprived of a fair opportunity to defend against Plaintiff's claims.
24
+
25
+ Respectfully submitted,
26
+
27
+ s/Bennet J. Moskowitz Bennet J. Moskowitz
marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750909/EFTA02750909.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,92 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750909.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 2,
15
+ "chars": 4328,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 0.76,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [],
20
+ "page_stats": [
21
+ {
22
+ "page_id": 0,
23
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
24
+ "block_counts": [
25
+ [
26
+ "Span",
27
+ 84
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ "Line",
31
+ 42
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ "Text",
35
+ 9
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ "PageHeader",
39
+ 4
40
+ ],
41
+ [
42
+ "PageFooter",
43
+ 1
44
+ ]
45
+ ],
46
+ "block_metadata": {
47
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
48
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
49
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
50
+ "previous_text": "",
51
+ "previous_type": "",
52
+ "previous_order": 0
53
+ }
54
+ },
55
+ {
56
+ "page_id": 1,
57
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
58
+ "block_counts": [
59
+ [
60
+ "Span",
61
+ 64
62
+ ],
63
+ [
64
+ "Line",
65
+ 32
66
+ ],
67
+ [
68
+ "Text",
69
+ 6
70
+ ],
71
+ [
72
+ "PageHeader",
73
+ 3
74
+ ],
75
+ [
76
+ "PageFooter",
77
+ 2
78
+ ]
79
+ ],
80
+ "block_metadata": {
81
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
82
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
83
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
84
+ "previous_text": "",
85
+ "previous_type": "",
86
+ "previous_order": 0
87
+ }
88
+ }
89
+ ],
90
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02750909"
91
+ }
92
+ }
marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750911/EFTA02750911.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ## KAPLAN HECKER & FINK LLP
2
+
3
+ ## VIA ECF
4
+
5
+ The Honorable Katherine Polk Failla United States District Court Southern District of New York Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007
6
+
7
+ NEW YORK. NEW YORK 10118
8
+
9
+ TEL (212) 763-0883 I FAX (212) 564-0883
10
+
11
+ WW W KAPLANHECKER COM
12
+
13
+ November 6, 2019
14
+
15
+ Re: Doe v. Indyke et al., No. 19-cv-08673 (S.D.N.Y.) (KPF)
16
+
17
+ Dear Judge Failla:
18
+
19
+ We represent Jane Doe in the above-captioned action. We write in response to Defendants' two letters filed yesterday regarding: (I) related case status (ECF 19); and (2) document preservation (ECF 20).
20
+
21
+ Since we do not see any conceivable basis under Rule 13 of the Rules for the Division of Business Among District Judges in the Southern District to oppose designating these cases with overlapping defendants, legal issues, and factual allegations as related, we oppose Defendants' request for 30 days to respond. See Local Rule for the Division of Business Among District Judges in the Southern District 13(a); see also Poindexter v. Cash Money Records, No. 13-cv-5882, 2014 WL 1383781, at •2 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 8, 2014); Pace v. Quante:nine:, No. 13-cv-91, 2013 WL 5405563, at •5 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 23, 2013). Our client was understandably shocked by the suicide of Jeffrey Epstein in federal custody, and is eager to obtain a modicum of justice as soon as possible. All we have seen from Defendants, however, are efforts at delay. We very much want to push this case forward to trial as soon as possible, and it is essential to have a judge assigned who will preside over the entire progress of the case in order to do so. I
22
+
23
+ Notably, contrary to the suggestion in Defendants' letter, Plaintiff is not seeking consolidation at this time. We further note that the cases that Plaintiff has proposed as related have now all been reassigned to the same magistrate judge, including: VE v. Nine East 71.0 Street et at, No. 19-cv-07625 (S.D.N.Y.) (Nathan, .1.); Doe I et at
24
+
25
+ As for preservation, the issues we have raised regarding preservation present yet another compelling reason why these cases should be marked as related since the risks of spoliation face plaintiffs in all cases. While we appreciate Defendants' explanation about Mr. Epstein's clothing (which was not previously provided to us), that was not the point of our prior letters and emails to Defendants. (*See, e.g.*, ECF 14 Ex. A.) The point of our letters and emails was that we have asked Defendants to identify *which* categories of documents and other information we have specified for preservation they believe are "argumentative, assume facts that have not been proven and implicate information protected by the attorney-client privilege and attorney work product doctrine," and are therefore not being preserved. Defendants have failed to answer that simple question, which understandably causes us great concern about spoliation given Mr. Epstein's multiple residences across the globe, the fact that one of the two Defendant executors is a lawyer, and the fact that, as a result of a will he signed just before his death, Mr. Epstein's estate is being probated in the Virgin Islands.
26
+
27
+ We look forward to discussing these issues with Your Honor in Court tomorrow.
28
+
29
+ Respectfully submitted,
30
+
31
+ ![]()Roberta A. Kaplan
32
+
33
+ cc: Counsel of Record
34
+
35
+ ---
36
+
37
+ *v. Jeffrey Epstein et al.*, No. 19-cv-07675 (S.D.N.Y.) (Daniels, J.); *Doe v. Darren K. Indyke et al.*, No. 19-cv-07771 (S.D.N.Y.) (Castel, J.); *Doe v. Darren K. Indyke et al.*, No. 19-cv-07772 (S.D.N.Y.) (Carter, J.); *Doe v. Darren K. Indyke et al.*, No. 19-cv-07773 (S.D.N.Y.) (Ramos, J.); and *Doe 17 v. Indyke et al.*, No. 19-cv-9610 (S.D.N.Y.) (Engelmayer, J.).
marker2/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750911/EFTA02750911.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,151 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-v-indyke-08673/EFTA02750911.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 2,
15
+ "chars": 3682,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 6.46,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "KAPLAN HECKER & FINK LLP",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 35.554,
27
+ 37.352
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 311.5762634277344,
31
+ 37.352
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 311.5762634277344,
35
+ 62.4361572265625
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 35.554,
39
+ 62.4361572265625
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "VIA ECF",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 71.108,
50
+ 233.85599999999997
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 126.875,
54
+ 233.85599999999997
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 126.875,
58
+ 249.67999267578125
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 71.108,
62
+ 249.67999267578125
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ }
66
+ ],
67
+ "page_stats": [
68
+ {
69
+ "page_id": 0,
70
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
71
+ "block_counts": [
72
+ [
73
+ "Span",
74
+ 71
75
+ ],
76
+ [
77
+ "Line",
78
+ 34
79
+ ],
80
+ [
81
+ "Text",
82
+ 12
83
+ ],
84
+ [
85
+ "SectionHeader",
86
+ 2
87
+ ],
88
+ [
89
+ "PageHeader",
90
+ 1
91
+ ],
92
+ [
93
+ "Footnote",
94
+ 1
95
+ ],
96
+ [
97
+ "PageFooter",
98
+ 1
99
+ ]
100
+ ],
101
+ "block_metadata": {
102
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
103
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
104
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
105
+ "previous_text": "",
106
+ "previous_type": "",
107
+ "previous_order": 0
108
+ }
109
+ },
110
+ {
111
+ "page_id": 1,
112
+ "text_extraction_method": "surya",
113
+ "block_counts": [
114
+ [
115
+ "Text",
116
+ 13
117
+ ],
118
+ [
119
+ "PageHeader",
120
+ 2
121
+ ],
122
+ [
123
+ "Caption",
124
+ 2
125
+ ],
126
+ [
127
+ "Footnote",
128
+ 2
129
+ ],
130
+ [
131
+ "PageFooter",
132
+ 2
133
+ ],
134
+ [
135
+ "SectionHeader",
136
+ 1
137
+ ]
138
+ ],
139
+ "block_metadata": {
140
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
141
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
142
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
143
+ "previous_text": "",
144
+ "previous_type": "",
145
+ "previous_order": 0
146
+ }
147
+ }
148
+ ],
149
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02750911"
150
+ }
151
+ }