robbd commited on
Commit
51f0fdd
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): ea4c6e7

MEMY-1805 marker2 court-doe-4-v-epstein (salt 4090): 420/420

Browse files
This view is limited to 50 files because it contains too many changes.   See raw diff
Files changed (50) hide show
  1. marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740335/EFTA02740335.md +185 -0
  2. marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740335/EFTA02740335.metadata.json +564 -0
  3. marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740341/EFTA02740341.md +47 -0
  4. marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740341/EFTA02740341.metadata.json +138 -0
  5. marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740341/_page_0_Picture_24.jpeg +3 -0
  6. marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740342/EFTA02740342.md +29 -0
  7. marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740342/EFTA02740342.metadata.json +143 -0
  8. marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740344/EFTA02740344.md +25 -0
  9. marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740344/EFTA02740344.metadata.json +109 -0
  10. marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740345/EFTA02740345.md +41 -0
  11. marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740345/EFTA02740345.metadata.json +151 -0
  12. marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740347/EFTA02740347.md +71 -0
  13. marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740347/EFTA02740347.metadata.json +58 -0
  14. marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740348/EFTA02740348.md +105 -0
  15. marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740348/EFTA02740348.metadata.json +155 -0
  16. marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740348/_page_0_Picture_36.jpeg +3 -0
  17. marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740348/_page_1_Picture_127.jpeg +3 -0
  18. marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740348/_page_1_Picture_130.jpeg +3 -0
  19. marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740350/EFTA02740350.md +17 -0
  20. marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740350/EFTA02740350.metadata.json +109 -0
  21. marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740351/EFTA02740351.md +39 -0
  22. marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740351/EFTA02740351.metadata.json +239 -0
  23. marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740354/EFTA02740354.md +29 -0
  24. marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740354/EFTA02740354.metadata.json +109 -0
  25. marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740355/EFTA02740355.md +27 -0
  26. marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740355/EFTA02740355.metadata.json +117 -0
  27. marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740356/EFTA02740356.md +42 -0
  28. marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740356/EFTA02740356.metadata.json +273 -0
  29. marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740360/EFTA02740360.md +23 -0
  30. marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740360/EFTA02740360.metadata.json +109 -0
  31. marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740361/EFTA02740361.md +29 -0
  32. marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740361/EFTA02740361.metadata.json +147 -0
  33. marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740363/EFTA02740363.md +137 -0
  34. marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740363/EFTA02740363.metadata.json +815 -0
  35. marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740374/EFTA02740374.md +45 -0
  36. marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740374/EFTA02740374.metadata.json +212 -0
  37. marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740377/EFTA02740377.md +77 -0
  38. marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740377/EFTA02740377.metadata.json +410 -0
  39. marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740383/EFTA02740383.md +93 -0
  40. marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740383/EFTA02740383.metadata.json +319 -0
  41. marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740387/EFTA02740387.md +51 -0
  42. marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740387/EFTA02740387.metadata.json +376 -0
  43. marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740392/EFTA02740392.md +53 -0
  44. marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740392/EFTA02740392.metadata.json +372 -0
  45. marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740397/EFTA02740397.md +184 -0
  46. marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740397/EFTA02740397.metadata.json +199 -0
  47. marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740401/EFTA02740401.md +41 -0
  48. marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740401/EFTA02740401.metadata.json +204 -0
  49. marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740404/EFTA02740404.md +33 -0
  50. marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740404/EFTA02740404.metadata.json +231 -0
marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740335/EFTA02740335.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,185 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA April 14, 2008
2
+
3
+ STEVEN M. LARIMORE CLERK U.S. 01ST. CT. S. O. OF FLA. • MIAMI
4
+
5
+ CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-Hurley-
6
+
7
+ JANE DOE NO. 4,
8
+
9
+ Plaintiff,
10
+
11
+ vs.
12
+
13
+ JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
14
+
15
+ Defendant.
16
+
17
+ # COMPLAINT
18
+
19
+ Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 4 ("Jane" or "Jane Doe"), brings this Complaint against Jeffrey
20
+
21
+ Epstein, as follows:
22
+
23
+ # Parties, Jurisdiction and Venue
24
+
25
+ - 1. Jane Doe No. 4 is acitizen and resident of the State of Florida, and is sui juris.
26
+ - 2. This Complaint is brought under afictitious name to protect the identity of the Plaintiff because this Complaint makes sensitive allegations of sexual assault and abuse upon <sup>a</sup> minor.
27
+ - 3. Defendant Jeffrey Epstein is acitizen and resident of the State of New York.
28
+ - 4. This is an action for damages in excess of \$50 million.
29
+ - 5. This Court has jurisdiction of this action and the claims set forth herein pursuant to <sup>28</sup> U.S.C. § 1332(a), as the matter in controversy (i) exceeds \$75,000, exclusive of interest and costs; and (ii) is between citizens of different states.
30
+ - 6. This Court has venue of this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1391(a) as <sup>a</sup>substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred in this District.
31
+
32
+ ### Factual Alleeations
33
+
34
+ 7. At all relevant times, Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") was an adult male, <sup>52</sup> years old. Epstein is afinancier and money manager with asecret clientele limited exclusively to billionaires. He is himself aman of tremendous wealth, power and influence. He maintains his principal home in New York and also owns residences in New Mexico, and Palm Beach, FL. The allegations herein concern Epstein's conduct while at his lavish estate in Palm Beach.
35
+
36
+ 8. Upon information and belief, Epstein has asexual preference and obsession for underage minor girls. He engaged in a plan and scheme in which he gained access to primarily economically disadvantaged minor girls in his home, sexually assaulted these girls, and then gave them money. In or about 2002-2003, Jane Doe, then approximately 15 years old, fell into Epstein's trap and became one of his victims.
37
+
38
+ 9. Upon information and belief, Jeffrey Epstein carried out his scheme and assaulted <sup>g</sup>irls in Florida, New York and on his private island, known as Little St. James, in St. S.
39
+
40
+ 10. Epstein's scheme involved the use of young girls to recruit underage girls.- \_, <sup>a</sup>Palm Beach Community College student from Loxahatchee, Florida recruited girls ostensibly to give a wealthy man <sup>a</sup>massage for monetary compensation in his Palm Beach mansion. The young girls would be contacted when Epstein was planning to be at his Palm Beach residence or soon after he had arrived there..\_, upon information and belief, generally sought out economically disadvantaged underage girls from western Palm Beach County who would be enticed by the money being offered - generally \$200 to \$300 per "massage" session - and who were perceived as less likely to complain to authorities or have credibility if allegations of improper conduct were made. This was an important element of Epstein's plan.
41
+
42
+ 11. Epstein's plan and scheme reflected a particular pattern and method. The underage victim would be brought to the kitchen entrance of Epstein's mansion, where she would be introduced to , Epstein's assistant. would then bring the girl up <sup>a</sup>flight of stairs to abedroom that contained a massage table in addition to other furnishings. There were photographs of nude women lining the stairway■ **and in the bedroom. The girl would then find herself alone in the room with Epstein, who would be wearing only atowel. He would then remove his towel and lie naked on the massage table, and direct the girl to remove her clothes. Epstein would then perform one or more lewd, lascivious and sexual acts, including masturbation and touching the girl's vagina.**
43
+
44
+ **12. Consistent with the foregoing plan and scheme, when Jane Doe was approximately <sup>15</sup> years old, she was recruited by to give Epstein a massage for monetary compensation. Jane was brought to Epstein's mansion in Palm Beach, to the kitchen entrance. Once there, Jane was introduced to who led her up the flight of stairs to the room with the massage table. In this room, Jane was directed by Epstein to remove her clothes and give him a massage. Jane initially kept her panties and bra on, and complied with Epstein's instructions. Jane was paid by Epstein for this massage.**
45
+
46
+ **13. Jane returned on many occasions to the Palm Beach mansion to provide Epstein with massages. On those occasions, Epstein engaged in sexual contact and activity with the minor Jane, which included, among other things, directing Jane to remove all her clothes, masturbating during the massage, and digitally penetrating Jane's vagina. Jeffrey Epstein often used avibrator on the minor Jane during the massage. This sexual abuse continued for approximately three years.**
47
+
48
+ **14. As aresult of these encounters with Epstein, Jane experienced confusion, shame,**
49
+
50
+ humiliation and embarrassment, and has suffered severe psychological and emotional injuries.
51
+
52
+ ### COUNT I Sexual Assault
53
+
54
+ - 15. Plaintiff Jane Doe repeats and realleges paragraphs 1 through 14 above.
55
+ - 16. Epstein tortiously assaulted Jane Doe sexually. Epstein's acts were intentional, unlawful, offensive and harmful.
56
+ - 17. Epstein's plan and scheme in which he committed such acts upon Jane Doe were done willfully and maliciously.
57
+ - 18. This sexual assault was in violation of Chapter 800 of the Florida Statutes, which recognizes as a crime the lewd and lascivious acts committed by Epstein upon Jane.
58
+ - 19. As a direct and proximate result of Epstein's assault on Jane, she has suffered and will continue to suffer severe and permanent traumatic injuries, including mental, psychological and emotional damages.
59
+
60
+ WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 4 demands judgment against Defendant Jeffrey Epstein for compensatory damages, punitive damages, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper.
61
+
62
+ ## COUNT II Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress
63
+
64
+ - 20. Plaintiff Jane Doe repeats and realleges paragraphs 1 through 14 above.
65
+ - 21. Epstein's conduct was intentional or reckless.
66
+ - 22. Epstein's conduct was outrageous, going beyond all bounds of decency.
67
+ - 23. Epstein's conduct caused severe emotional distress to Jane Doe. Epstein knew or had reason to know that his intentional and outrageous conduct would cause emotional trauma and
68
+
69
+ damage to Jane Doe.
70
+
71
+ 24. As a direct and proximate result of Epstein's intentional or reckless conduct, Jane Doe, has suffered and will continue to suffer severe mental anguish and pain.
72
+
73
+ WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 4 demands judgment against Defendant Jeffrey Epstein for compensatory damages, costs, punitive damages, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper.
74
+
75
+ ## JURY TRIAL DEMAND
76
+
77
+ Plaintiffs demand a jury trial in this action.
78
+
79
+ Dated: April 551-12008
80
+
81
+ Respectfully submitted,
82
+
83
+ HERMAN & MERMELSTEIN, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiffs 18205 Biscayne Blvd. Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160 Tel: 305-931-2200 Fax: 305-93
84
+
85
+ By:
86
+
87
+ Jeffrey M. Herman iherman@hermanlaw.com Florida Bar No. 521647 Stuart S. Mermelstein smermelstein@herrnanlaw.com Florida Bar No. 947245 Adam D. Horowitz Florida Bar No. 376980 ahorowitzahermanlaw.com
88
+
89
+ The JS-44 civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replace nor supplement the filing, and service papers or other papers as required by law, except as provided by local rules of court. This form, approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September 1974, is required for the use of the Clerk of the Court for the purpose of initiating the civil docket sheet. (SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON THE REVERSE OF THE FORM.)
90
+
91
+ I(a) PLAINTIFFS
92
+ JANE DOE NO. 4,
93
+
94
+ DEFENDANTS
95
+ JEFFREY EPSTEIN
96
+
97
+ APR 14 2008
98
+
99
+ (b) COUNTY OF RESIDENCE OF FIRST LISTED PLAINTIFF
100
+ MARION COUNTY
101
+ (EXCEPT IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES)
102
+
103
+ COUNTY OF RESIDENCE OF FIRST LISTED PLAINTIFF CONFIRMED ARMORE PLAINTIFF DIST. OF CONFIRMED ARMORE PLAINTIFF DIST. OF FLA. FT. LAUD.
104
+
105
+ (c) ATTORNEYS (FIRM NAME, ADDRESS, AND TELEPHONE NUMBER)
106
+ Herman & Mermelstein, P.A., 18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218, Miami,
107
+ FL 33160, (305) 931-2200
108
+
109
+ ATTORNEYS (IF KNOWN)
110
+
111
+ (d) CIRCLE COUNTY WHERE ACTION AROSE: PALM BEACH
112
+
113
+ 9:08 CV 80380 - Hurley Apt time
114
+
115
+ ## II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION AND ONE BOY
116
+
117
+ | <p><input type="checkbox"/> <b>1. U.S. Government</b></p> <p>Plaintiff</p> | <p><input type="checkbox"/> <b>3. Federal Question</b></p> <p>(U.S. Government Not a Party)</p> |
118
+ |----------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
119
+ | <p><input type="checkbox"/> <b>2. U.S. Government</b></p> <p>Defendant</p> | <p><input checked="" type="checkbox"/> <b>4. Diversity</b></p> <p>(Indicate Citizenship of Parties in Item III)</p> |
120
+
121
+ ### III. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES
122
+
123
+ (For Diversity Case Only)
124
+
125
+ | Citizen of This State | <input checked="" type="checkbox"/> X 1 | <input type="checkbox"/> 2 |
126
+ |-----------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
127
+ | Citizen of Another State | <input type="checkbox"/> 2 | <input checked="" type="checkbox"/> 2 |
128
+ | Citizen or Subject of a Foreign Country | <input type="checkbox"/> 3 | <input type="checkbox"/> 3 |
129
+
130
+ PLACE AN X IN ONE BOX FOR PLAINTIFF
131
+ AND ONE FOR DEFENDANT PTF DEF
132
+ Incorporated of Principal Place of 4 4
133
+
134
+ IV. CAUSE OF ACTION
135
+ DO NOT CITE ILLIDENTITY
136
+
137
+ DO NOT CITE JURISDICTIONAL STATUTES UNLESS DIVERSITY.)
138
+ **DIVERSITY ACTION UNDER 28 U.S.C. §1332(a) FOR SEXUAL ASSAULT**
139
+
140
+ **IVa. 5 days estimated (for both sides) to try entire case**
141
+
142
+ ### V. NATURE OF SUIT
143
+
144
+ (PLACE AN X IN ONE BOX ONLY)
145
+
146
+ VI. ORIGIN
147
+ x 1 Original
148
+
149
+ 1. Proceeding      2. Removed from      3. Remainded from      4. Appeal to District Judge from Appeal to District Judgment
150
+ 5. Transferred from another district      6. Magistrate Judgment
151
+
152
+ VII. REQUESTED
153
+ IN COMPLAINT
154
+
155
+ CHECK IF THIS IS A
156
+ UNDER F.R.C.P. 23
157
+
158
+ CLASS ACTION      DEMAND \$
159
+
160
+ Check YES only if demanded in complaint: **JURY DEMAND:**
161
+
162
+ VIII. RELATED CASE(S) IF ANY (See Instructions):
163
+
164
+ Jane Doe 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein
165
+ Jane Doe 3 v. Jeffrey Epstein
166
+
167
+ (SEE ATTACHED)
168
+
169
+ JUDGE KENNETH A. MARRA
170
+ JUDGE KENNETH A. MARRA
171
+
172
+ DOCKET NUMBER 08-CV-80119-MARRA-
173
+ DOCKET NUMBER 08-CV-80232-MARRA-
174
+
175
+ DATE 4/14/08
176
+
177
+ SIGNATURE OF ATTORNEY OF RECORD
178
+
179
+ *SMA*
180
+
181
+ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
182
+ S/F 1-2
183
+ REV. 9/94
184
+
185
+ 542749
marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740335/EFTA02740335.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,564 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740335.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 6,
15
+ "chars": 10810,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 153.86,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "COMPLAINT",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 261.375,
27
+ 295.65
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 345.15179443359375,
31
+ 295.65
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 345.15179443359375,
35
+ 311.85
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 261.375,
39
+ 311.85
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "Parties, Jurisdiction and Venue",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 218.325,
50
+ 380.7
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 390.52500000000003,
54
+ 380.7
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 390.52500000000003,
58
+ 397.2649230957031
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 218.325,
62
+ 397.2649230957031
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ },
66
+ {
67
+ "title": "Factual Alleeations",
68
+ "heading_level": null,
69
+ "page_id": 1,
70
+ "polygon": [
71
+ [
72
+ 250.92000000000002,
73
+ 83.42999999999999
74
+ ],
75
+ [
76
+ 357.48443603515625,
77
+ 83.42999999999999
78
+ ],
79
+ [
80
+ 357.48443603515625,
81
+ 97.13299560546875
82
+ ],
83
+ [
84
+ 250.92000000000002,
85
+ 97.13299560546875
86
+ ]
87
+ ]
88
+ },
89
+ {
90
+ "title": "COUNT I \nSexual Assault",
91
+ "heading_level": null,
92
+ "page_id": 3,
93
+ "polygon": [
94
+ [
95
+ 260.76,
96
+ 112.59
97
+ ],
98
+ [
99
+ 341.75555419921875,
100
+ 112.59
101
+ ],
102
+ [
103
+ 341.75555419921875,
104
+ 140.9830322265625
105
+ ],
106
+ [
107
+ 260.76,
108
+ 140.9830322265625
109
+ ]
110
+ ]
111
+ },
112
+ {
113
+ "title": "COUNT II \nIntentional Infliction of Emotional Distress",
114
+ "heading_level": null,
115
+ "page_id": 3,
116
+ "polygon": [
117
+ [
118
+ 187.575,
119
+ 523.26
120
+ ],
121
+ [
122
+ 413.91180419921875,
123
+ 523.26
124
+ ],
125
+ [
126
+ 413.91180419921875,
127
+ 552.7330169677734
128
+ ],
129
+ [
130
+ 187.575,
131
+ 552.7330169677734
132
+ ]
133
+ ]
134
+ },
135
+ {
136
+ "title": "JURY TRIAL DEMAND",
137
+ "heading_level": null,
138
+ "page_id": 4,
139
+ "polygon": [
140
+ [
141
+ 232.46999999999997,
142
+ 253.53000000000003
143
+ ],
144
+ [
145
+ 369.48492431640625,
146
+ 253.53000000000003
147
+ ],
148
+ [
149
+ 369.48492431640625,
150
+ 268.56353759765625
151
+ ],
152
+ [
153
+ 232.46999999999997,
154
+ 268.56353759765625
155
+ ]
156
+ ]
157
+ },
158
+ {
159
+ "title": "II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION AND ONE BOY",
160
+ "heading_level": null,
161
+ "page_id": 5,
162
+ "polygon": [
163
+ [
164
+ 18.45,
165
+ 186.3
166
+ ],
167
+ [
168
+ 101.47500000000001,
169
+ 186.3
170
+ ],
171
+ [
172
+ 101.47500000000001,
173
+ 206.54999999999998
174
+ ],
175
+ [
176
+ 18.45,
177
+ 206.54999999999998
178
+ ]
179
+ ]
180
+ },
181
+ {
182
+ "title": "III. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES",
183
+ "heading_level": null,
184
+ "page_id": 5,
185
+ "polygon": [
186
+ [
187
+ 246.0,
188
+ 182.25
189
+ ],
190
+ [
191
+ 405.90000000000003,
192
+ 182.25
193
+ ],
194
+ [
195
+ 405.90000000000003,
196
+ 198.45000000000002
197
+ ],
198
+ [
199
+ 246.0,
200
+ 198.45000000000002
201
+ ]
202
+ ]
203
+ },
204
+ {
205
+ "title": "IV. CAUSE OF ACTION DO NOT CITE ILLIDENTITY",
206
+ "heading_level": null,
207
+ "page_id": 5,
208
+ "polygon": [
209
+ [
210
+ 18.45,
211
+ 279.45
212
+ ],
213
+ [
214
+ 113.77499999999999,
215
+ 279.45
216
+ ],
217
+ [
218
+ 113.77499999999999,
219
+ 295.65
220
+ ],
221
+ [
222
+ 18.45,
223
+ 295.65
224
+ ]
225
+ ]
226
+ },
227
+ {
228
+ "title": "IVa. 5 days estimated (for both sides) to try entire case",
229
+ "heading_level": null,
230
+ "page_id": 5,
231
+ "polygon": [
232
+ [
233
+ 18.45,
234
+ 315.9
235
+ ],
236
+ [
237
+ 239.85000000000002,
238
+ 315.9
239
+ ],
240
+ [
241
+ 239.85000000000002,
242
+ 328.04999999999995
243
+ ],
244
+ [
245
+ 18.45,
246
+ 328.04999999999995
247
+ ]
248
+ ]
249
+ },
250
+ {
251
+ "title": "VI. ORIGIN x 1 Original",
252
+ "heading_level": null,
253
+ "page_id": 5,
254
+ "polygon": [
255
+ [
256
+ 18.45,
257
+ 571.05
258
+ ],
259
+ [
260
+ 70.725,
261
+ 571.05
262
+ ],
263
+ [
264
+ 70.725,
265
+ 587.25
266
+ ],
267
+ [
268
+ 18.45,
269
+ 587.25
270
+ ]
271
+ ]
272
+ },
273
+ {
274
+ "title": "VII. REQUESTED IN COMPLAINT",
275
+ "heading_level": null,
276
+ "page_id": 5,
277
+ "polygon": [
278
+ [
279
+ 18.45,
280
+ 623.7
281
+ ],
282
+ [
283
+ 101.47500000000001,
284
+ 623.7
285
+ ],
286
+ [
287
+ 101.47500000000001,
288
+ 643.95
289
+ ],
290
+ [
291
+ 18.45,
292
+ 643.95
293
+ ]
294
+ ]
295
+ },
296
+ {
297
+ "title": "VIII. RELATED CASE(S) IF ANY (See Instructions):",
298
+ "heading_level": null,
299
+ "page_id": 5,
300
+ "polygon": [
301
+ [
302
+ 18.45,
303
+ 652.0500000000001
304
+ ],
305
+ [
306
+ 199.875,
307
+ 652.0500000000001
308
+ ],
309
+ [
310
+ 199.875,
311
+ 676.3499999999999
312
+ ],
313
+ [
314
+ 18.45,
315
+ 676.3499999999999
316
+ ]
317
+ ]
318
+ }
319
+ ],
320
+ "page_stats": [
321
+ {
322
+ "page_id": 0,
323
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
324
+ "block_counts": [
325
+ [
326
+ "Span",
327
+ 272
328
+ ],
329
+ [
330
+ "Line",
331
+ 33
332
+ ],
333
+ [
334
+ "Text",
335
+ 14
336
+ ],
337
+ [
338
+ "ListItem",
339
+ 6
340
+ ],
341
+ [
342
+ "PageFooter",
343
+ 3
344
+ ],
345
+ [
346
+ "PageHeader",
347
+ 2
348
+ ],
349
+ [
350
+ "SectionHeader",
351
+ 2
352
+ ],
353
+ [
354
+ "ListGroup",
355
+ 1
356
+ ]
357
+ ],
358
+ "block_metadata": {
359
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
360
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
361
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
362
+ "previous_text": "",
363
+ "previous_type": "",
364
+ "previous_order": 0
365
+ }
366
+ },
367
+ {
368
+ "page_id": 1,
369
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
370
+ "block_counts": [
371
+ [
372
+ "Span",
373
+ 378
374
+ ],
375
+ [
376
+ "Line",
377
+ 27
378
+ ],
379
+ [
380
+ "PageFooter",
381
+ 5
382
+ ],
383
+ [
384
+ "Text",
385
+ 4
386
+ ],
387
+ [
388
+ "PageHeader",
389
+ 1
390
+ ],
391
+ [
392
+ "SectionHeader",
393
+ 1
394
+ ]
395
+ ],
396
+ "block_metadata": {
397
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
398
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
399
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
400
+ "previous_text": "",
401
+ "previous_type": "",
402
+ "previous_order": 0
403
+ }
404
+ },
405
+ {
406
+ "page_id": 2,
407
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
408
+ "block_counts": [
409
+ [
410
+ "Span",
411
+ 389
412
+ ],
413
+ [
414
+ "Line",
415
+ 27
416
+ ],
417
+ [
418
+ "PageFooter",
419
+ 5
420
+ ],
421
+ [
422
+ "Text",
423
+ 4
424
+ ],
425
+ [
426
+ "PageHeader",
427
+ 1
428
+ ]
429
+ ],
430
+ "block_metadata": {
431
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
432
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
433
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
434
+ "previous_text": "",
435
+ "previous_type": "",
436
+ "previous_order": 0
437
+ }
438
+ },
439
+ {
440
+ "page_id": 3,
441
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
442
+ "block_counts": [
443
+ [
444
+ "Span",
445
+ 55
446
+ ],
447
+ [
448
+ "Line",
449
+ 28
450
+ ],
451
+ [
452
+ "ListItem",
453
+ 9
454
+ ],
455
+ [
456
+ "PageFooter",
457
+ 5
458
+ ],
459
+ [
460
+ "Text",
461
+ 2
462
+ ],
463
+ [
464
+ "SectionHeader",
465
+ 2
466
+ ],
467
+ [
468
+ "ListGroup",
469
+ 2
470
+ ],
471
+ [
472
+ "PageHeader",
473
+ 1
474
+ ]
475
+ ],
476
+ "block_metadata": {
477
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
478
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
479
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
480
+ "previous_text": "",
481
+ "previous_type": "",
482
+ "previous_order": 0
483
+ }
484
+ },
485
+ {
486
+ "page_id": 4,
487
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
488
+ "block_counts": [
489
+ [
490
+ "Span",
491
+ 66
492
+ ],
493
+ [
494
+ "Line",
495
+ 33
496
+ ],
497
+ [
498
+ "Text",
499
+ 9
500
+ ],
501
+ [
502
+ "PageFooter",
503
+ 5
504
+ ],
505
+ [
506
+ "PageHeader",
507
+ 1
508
+ ],
509
+ [
510
+ "SectionHeader",
511
+ 1
512
+ ]
513
+ ],
514
+ "block_metadata": {
515
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
516
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
517
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
518
+ "previous_text": "",
519
+ "previous_type": "",
520
+ "previous_order": 0
521
+ }
522
+ },
523
+ {
524
+ "page_id": 5,
525
+ "text_extraction_method": "surya",
526
+ "block_counts": [
527
+ [
528
+ "Text",
529
+ 62
530
+ ],
531
+ [
532
+ "SectionHeader",
533
+ 14
534
+ ],
535
+ [
536
+ "PageFooter",
537
+ 4
538
+ ],
539
+ [
540
+ "PageHeader",
541
+ 2
542
+ ],
543
+ [
544
+ "ListGroup",
545
+ 2
546
+ ],
547
+ [
548
+ "Table",
549
+ 1
550
+ ]
551
+ ],
552
+ "block_metadata": {
553
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
554
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
555
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
556
+ "previous_text": "",
557
+ "previous_type": "",
558
+ "previous_order": 0
559
+ }
560
+ }
561
+ ],
562
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02740335"
563
+ }
564
+ }
marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740341/EFTA02740341.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ## United States District Court
2
+
3
+ Southern DISTRICT OF Florida
4
+
5
+ ## SUMMONS
6
+
7
+ JANE DOE NO. 4,
8
+
9
+ Plaintiff, CASE NO. 08-CV-80380-Hurley-
10
+
11
+ vs.
12
+
13
+ JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
14
+
15
+ Defendant.
16
+
17
+ TO: JEFFREY EPSTEIN, individually:
18
+
19
+ 9 EAST 71ST STREET NEW YORK, NY 10021
20
+
21
+ Or
22
+
23
+ 358 EL BRILLO WAY PALM BEACH FL 33480
24
+
25
+ YOU ARE HEREBY SUMMONED and required to serve upon PLAINTIFF'S ATTORNEY,
26
+
27
+ Jeffrey M. Herman, Esq.
28
+
29
+ Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq.
30
+
31
+ Herman & Mermelstein, P.A.
32
+
33
+ 18205 Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 2218
34
+
35
+ Miami, Florida 33160
36
+
37
+ (305) 931-2200
38
+
39
+ an answer to the complaint which is herewith served upon you, within 20 days after service of this summons upon you, exclusive of the day of service. If you fail to do so, judgment by default will be taken against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. You must also file your answer with the Clerk of this Court within a reasonable period of time after service.
40
+
41
+ ![](_page_0_Picture_24.jpeg)
42
+
43
+ Steven M. Larimore Clerk of Court
44
+
45
+ ## SI:1111O\S DATE
46
+
47
+ s/Vernice Deputy Clerk U.S. District Courts April 14, 2008
marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740341/EFTA02740341.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,138 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740341.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 1,
15
+ "chars": 1032,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 1.39,
17
+ "image_assets": [
18
+ "_page_0_Picture_24.jpeg"
19
+ ],
20
+ "marker_metadata": {
21
+ "table_of_contents": [
22
+ {
23
+ "title": "United States District Court",
24
+ "heading_level": null,
25
+ "page_id": 0,
26
+ "polygon": [
27
+ [
28
+ 135.915,
29
+ 45.1322021484375
30
+ ],
31
+ [
32
+ 476.01861572265625,
33
+ 45.1322021484375
34
+ ],
35
+ [
36
+ 476.01861572265625,
37
+ 76.33294677734375
38
+ ],
39
+ [
40
+ 135.915,
41
+ 76.33294677734375
42
+ ]
43
+ ]
44
+ },
45
+ {
46
+ "title": "SUMMONS",
47
+ "heading_level": null,
48
+ "page_id": 0,
49
+ "polygon": [
50
+ [
51
+ 258.91499999999996,
52
+ 99.23907470703125
53
+ ],
54
+ [
55
+ 345.5083312988281,
56
+ 99.23907470703125
57
+ ],
58
+ [
59
+ 345.5083312988281,
60
+ 117.4989013671875
61
+ ],
62
+ [
63
+ 258.91499999999996,
64
+ 117.4989013671875
65
+ ]
66
+ ]
67
+ },
68
+ {
69
+ "title": "SI:1111O\\S DATE",
70
+ "heading_level": null,
71
+ "page_id": 0,
72
+ "polygon": [
73
+ [
74
+ 153.75,
75
+ 595.3499999999999
76
+ ],
77
+ [
78
+ 326.6669616699219,
79
+ 595.3499999999999
80
+ ],
81
+ [
82
+ 326.6669616699219,
83
+ 619.8066711425781
84
+ ],
85
+ [
86
+ 153.75,
87
+ 619.8066711425781
88
+ ]
89
+ ]
90
+ }
91
+ ],
92
+ "page_stats": [
93
+ {
94
+ "page_id": 0,
95
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
96
+ "block_counts": [
97
+ [
98
+ "Span",
99
+ 70
100
+ ],
101
+ [
102
+ "Line",
103
+ 35
104
+ ],
105
+ [
106
+ "Text",
107
+ 25
108
+ ],
109
+ [
110
+ "SectionHeader",
111
+ 3
112
+ ],
113
+ [
114
+ "PageHeader",
115
+ 2
116
+ ],
117
+ [
118
+ "Picture",
119
+ 1
120
+ ],
121
+ [
122
+ "PageFooter",
123
+ 1
124
+ ]
125
+ ],
126
+ "block_metadata": {
127
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
128
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
129
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
130
+ "previous_text": "",
131
+ "previous_type": "",
132
+ "previous_order": 0
133
+ }
134
+ }
135
+ ],
136
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02740341"
137
+ }
138
+ }
marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740341/_page_0_Picture_24.jpeg ADDED

Git LFS Details

  • SHA256: 1723344c62effb689bb780c66abb84d93cb85a52ed38270cf0bf078803fc937c
  • Pointer size: 130 Bytes
  • Size of remote file: 16.4 kB
marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740342/EFTA02740342.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
2
+
3
+ CASE NO. 08080380--CIV-HURLEY
4
+
5
+ JANE DOE NO. 4, plaintiff,
6
+
7
+ VS.
8
+
9
+ JEFFREY EPSTEIN, defendant.
10
+
11
+ ## ORDER OF TRANSFER
12
+
13
+ THIS CAUSE is before the court upon its own motion, pursuant to Local Rule 3.9(C). It is herewith ORDERED and ADJUDGED that this case is transferred to the calendar of The Honorable Kenneth A. Marra.
14
+
15
+ DONE and SIGNED in day of April, 2008. at West Palm Beach, Florida, this Ar
16
+
17
+ Daniel T. K. Hur / y United States Dis ict Judge
18
+
19
+ After review of the court file, the undersigned hereby accepts the transfer of this case.
20
+
21
+ It is therefore ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that all pleadings shall hereafter bear Case No. 08-80380-CIV- MARRA, indicating the Judge to whose calendar the case is now assigned.
22
+
23
+ DONE and SIGNED in at Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this /7 lay of April, 2008.
24
+
25
+ > Kenneth A. Marra United States District Judge
26
+
27
+ Copy furnished to:
28
+
29
+ Hon. Daniel T.K. Hurley Lucy Lara, Case Assignment Administrator all counsel
marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740342/EFTA02740342.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,143 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740342.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 2,
15
+ "chars": 991,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 0.63,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 180.195,
27
+ 110.16000000000003
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 427.67218017578125,
31
+ 110.16000000000003
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 427.67218017578125,
35
+ 143.75091552734375
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 180.195,
39
+ 143.75091552734375
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "ORDER OF TRANSFER",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 223.86,
50
+ 342.63
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 383.3591003417969,
54
+ 342.63
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 383.3591003417969,
58
+ 359.7509460449219
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 223.86,
62
+ 359.7509460449219
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ }
66
+ ],
67
+ "page_stats": [
68
+ {
69
+ "page_id": 0,
70
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
71
+ "block_counts": [
72
+ [
73
+ "Span",
74
+ 43
75
+ ],
76
+ [
77
+ "Line",
78
+ 21
79
+ ],
80
+ [
81
+ "Text",
82
+ 9
83
+ ],
84
+ [
85
+ "SectionHeader",
86
+ 2
87
+ ],
88
+ [
89
+ "PageHeader",
90
+ 1
91
+ ],
92
+ [
93
+ "PageFooter",
94
+ 1
95
+ ]
96
+ ],
97
+ "block_metadata": {
98
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
99
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
100
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
101
+ "previous_text": "",
102
+ "previous_type": "",
103
+ "previous_order": 0
104
+ }
105
+ },
106
+ {
107
+ "page_id": 1,
108
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
109
+ "block_counts": [
110
+ [
111
+ "Span",
112
+ 27
113
+ ],
114
+ [
115
+ "Line",
116
+ 14
117
+ ],
118
+ [
119
+ "Text",
120
+ 5
121
+ ],
122
+ [
123
+ "PageFooter",
124
+ 2
125
+ ],
126
+ [
127
+ "PageHeader",
128
+ 1
129
+ ]
130
+ ],
131
+ "block_metadata": {
132
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
133
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
134
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
135
+ "previous_text": "",
136
+ "previous_type": "",
137
+ "previous_order": 0
138
+ }
139
+ }
140
+ ],
141
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02740342"
142
+ }
143
+ }
marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740344/EFTA02740344.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
2
+
3
+ Case No.08-80380-Civ-Marra
4
+
5
+ JANE DOE NO. 4,
6
+
7
+ Plaintiff,
8
+
9
+ vs.
10
+
11
+ JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
12
+
13
+ Defendant.
14
+
15
+ ## CERTIFICATION AND ORDER OF TRANSFER TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE
16
+
17
+ This matter comes before the undersigned on an Order of Transfer to United States District Court Judge Kenneth A. Marra signed by United States District Court Judge Daniel T. Hurley. (DE 3). The undersigned certifies that the above-styled case presently has no referred, fully briefed pending motions and is therefore ready to be transferred to Judge Marra's paired Magistrate Judge.
18
+
19
+ The Clerk of Court shall hereby transfer the Magistrate Judge assignment for the instant case to United States Magistrate Judge Linnea R.
20
+
21
+ DONE and ORDERED in this 18 day of April, 2008, at West Palm Beach in the Southern District of Florida.
22
+
23
+ > 447,1eAl-AMES M. UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
24
+
25
+ Copies to: Counsel of Record United States District Judge Kenneth A Marra United States Magistrate Judge Linnea R.
marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740344/EFTA02740344.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740344.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 1,
15
+ "chars": 1008,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 0.7,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 206.856,
27
+ 72.08999999999999
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 405.5581359863281,
31
+ 72.08999999999999
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 405.5581359863281,
35
+ 100.4830322265625
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 206.856,
39
+ 100.4830322265625
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "CERTIFICATION AND ORDER OF TRANSFER TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 99.144,
50
+ 298.08
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 513.4038696289062,
54
+ 298.08
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 513.4038696289062,
58
+ 313.4830322265625
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 99.144,
62
+ 313.4830322265625
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ }
66
+ ],
67
+ "page_stats": [
68
+ {
69
+ "page_id": 0,
70
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
71
+ "block_counts": [
72
+ [
73
+ "Span",
74
+ 50
75
+ ],
76
+ [
77
+ "Line",
78
+ 26
79
+ ],
80
+ [
81
+ "Text",
82
+ 11
83
+ ],
84
+ [
85
+ "SectionHeader",
86
+ 2
87
+ ],
88
+ [
89
+ "PageHeader",
90
+ 1
91
+ ],
92
+ [
93
+ "PageFooter",
94
+ 1
95
+ ]
96
+ ],
97
+ "block_metadata": {
98
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
99
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
100
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
101
+ "previous_text": "",
102
+ "previous_type": "",
103
+ "previous_order": 0
104
+ }
105
+ }
106
+ ],
107
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02740344"
108
+ }
109
+ }
marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740345/EFTA02740345.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
2
+
3
+ CASE NO. 08-80380-CIV-MARRA
4
+
5
+ JANE DOE NO. 4,
6
+
7
+ Plaintiff, vs.
8
+
9
+ JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
10
+
11
+ Defendant.
12
+
13
+ ## ORDER REQUIRING COUNSEL TO CONFER, FILE JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT AND FILE JOINT DISCOVERY REPORT
14
+
15
+ THIS ORDER has been entered upon the filing of the complaint. Plaintiff's counsel is hereby ORDERED to forward to all defendants, upon receipt of either an answer or a motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. I2(b), a copy of this order.
16
+
17
+ It is further ORDERED:
18
+
19
+ - I. Every motion when filed shall be accompanied by a proposed order, except that motions to dismiss and motions for summary judgment need not be accompanied by a proposed order.
20
+ - 2. Pretrial discovery in this case shall be conducted in accord with Local Rule 16.1 and Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
21
+ - 3. Pursuant to Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, unless this action is excluded under Rule 26(a)(I)(E), the parties must confer within twenty-one (21) days after the last responding party either files an answer or a motion pursuant to Fed. IL Civ. P. 12(b), whichever is earlier, to consider the nature and basis of their claims and defenses and the possibilities for a prompt settlement or resolution of the case, to make or arrange for the
22
+
23
+ disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1), and to develop a proposed discovery plan that indicates the parties' views and proposals concerning the matters listed in Rule 26(f).
24
+
25
+ 4. The parties are jointly responsible for submitting a written report of this conference outlining the proposed discovery plan within 14 days after the conference.
26
+
27
+ 5. Counsel for the parties shall hold a scheduling conference either at the same time as the discovery conference described in Rule 26(1) or within fourteen (14) calendar days thereafter. See Local Rule 16.1(B).
28
+
29
+ 6. Within fourteen (14) days of the scheduling conference, counsel shall file a joint scheduling report pursuant to Local Rule 16.1(B)(2). This report shall indicate the proposed month and year for the trial plus the estimated number of trial days required, as well as an indication of whether the trial is to be a jury trial or bench trial.
30
+
31
+ 7. The parties may submit a single report combining the discovery plan report and the scheduling conference report.
32
+
33
+ 8. Failure of counsel or unrepresented parties to file a discovery plan report or joint scheduling report may result in dismissal, default, and the imposition of other sanctions including attorney's fees and costs.
34
+
35
+ DONE AND SIGNED in at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 18" day of April, 2008.
36
+
37
+ > KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge
38
+
39
+ Copies furnished to:
40
+
41
+ All counsel
marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740345/EFTA02740345.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,151 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740345.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 2,
15
+ "chars": 2702,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 0.72,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 206.856,
27
+ 57.50999999999999
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 405.8953857421875,
31
+ 57.50999999999999
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 405.8953857421875,
35
+ 86.68359375
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 206.856,
39
+ 86.68359375
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "ORDER REQUIRING COUNSEL TO CONFER, FILE JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT \nAND FILE JOINT DISCOVERY REPORT",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 72.216,
50
+ 269.73
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 540.4690551757812,
54
+ 269.73
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 540.4690551757812,
58
+ 299.6030578613281
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 72.216,
62
+ 299.6030578613281
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ }
66
+ ],
67
+ "page_stats": [
68
+ {
69
+ "page_id": 0,
70
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
71
+ "block_counts": [
72
+ [
73
+ "Span",
74
+ 51
75
+ ],
76
+ [
77
+ "Line",
78
+ 26
79
+ ],
80
+ [
81
+ "Text",
82
+ 7
83
+ ],
84
+ [
85
+ "ListItem",
86
+ 3
87
+ ],
88
+ [
89
+ "SectionHeader",
90
+ 2
91
+ ],
92
+ [
93
+ "PageHeader",
94
+ 1
95
+ ],
96
+ [
97
+ "ListGroup",
98
+ 1
99
+ ],
100
+ [
101
+ "PageFooter",
102
+ 1
103
+ ]
104
+ ],
105
+ "block_metadata": {
106
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
107
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
108
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
109
+ "previous_text": "",
110
+ "previous_type": "",
111
+ "previous_order": 0
112
+ }
113
+ },
114
+ {
115
+ "page_id": 1,
116
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
117
+ "block_counts": [
118
+ [
119
+ "Span",
120
+ 49
121
+ ],
122
+ [
123
+ "Line",
124
+ 25
125
+ ],
126
+ [
127
+ "Text",
128
+ 10
129
+ ],
130
+ [
131
+ "PageFooter",
132
+ 2
133
+ ],
134
+ [
135
+ "PageHeader",
136
+ 1
137
+ ]
138
+ ],
139
+ "block_metadata": {
140
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
141
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
142
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
143
+ "previous_text": "",
144
+ "previous_type": "",
145
+ "previous_order": 0
146
+ }
147
+ }
148
+ ],
149
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02740345"
150
+ }
151
+ }
marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740347/EFTA02740347.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ HERMAN & MERMELSTEIN PA
2
+
3
+ ATTN:
4
+
5
+ U.S.SOUTHERN DIST. COURT FLORIDA COUNTY
6
+
7
+ JANE DOE NO.4
8
+
9
+ - against -
10
+
11
+ plaintiff
12
+
13
+ JEFFREY EPSTEIN defendant
14
+
15
+ Index No. 08CV80380
16
+
17
+ Date Filed
18
+
19
+ Office No.
20
+
21
+ Court Date: / /
22
+
23
+ STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF NEW YORK :SS: HARRY being duly sworn, deposes and says; I am over 18 years of age, not a party to this action, and reside in the State of New York. That 7th day of May, 2008 07:45 AM at on the
24
+
25
+ 9 EAST 71ST ST
26
+
27
+ NEW YORK, NY 10021
28
+
29
+ I served the SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT
30
+
31
+ after prior attempts were made on: 04/23/2008 upon JEFFREY EPSTEIN 06:15 PM 04/24/2008 02:30 PM 05/01/2008 06:27Plt \*1
32
+
33
+ the DEFENDANT therein named by delivering and of the aforementioned documents with leaving a true copy or copies
34
+
35
+ "JOHN ", ASSISTANT & HOUSE STAFF EMPLOYEE WHO
36
+
37
+ REFUSED TRUE NAME
38
+
39
+ a person of suitable age and discretion, who refused access to DEFENDANT's actual apartment, and accepted in accordance with his/her everyday duties.
40
+
41
+ Deponent describes the person served as aforesaid to the best of deponent's ability at the time and circumstances of the service as follows:
42
+
43
+ SEX: MALE COLOR: HAIR: AGE: 45 HEIGHT: 6:0 WEIGHT: 200
44
+
45
+ OTHER IDENTIFYING FEATURES: MUSTACHE/BEARD
46
+
47
+ ffi.D\_D5L1212nos-li-clepes4-tea-i,n-theasited-States-maii-a-tr:ue-ropy-o4-tale-atepement4emea- stocumenta prnparlq-anclosed-and-aealed-in.a post-paid—wrapper addreased-ro-rhe-said JIEEM0DANDE.a.t tha\_aboae\_addzaas -That adArasa.4lling.-
48
+
49
+ aaatJknnmmL.xasidgancaeuaua141ac.a..ot-ab.ode-ot-tkwa-4M&FENINMNT.
50
+
51
+ •Cepy-ina4,70acl.4.4a'-olass-ma.i4-maraeet-pereettei-&-eonfielt.,Lierl--not intent -ins-en-the -tautaiale--thereof .b3 rPtiren\_addressLax-otherwise-tbat-sailamarioe.4a etoca-an-atesneira"---COSIGOC4:16-aot-iori-agaiset she\_person.\_to\_la-sexicerl- \*\* & 5/5/08 9:20PM
52
+
53
+ That at the time of service as aforesaid, I asked person spoken to whether DEPENDANT was in the military service of the State of New York or United States and received a negative reply. Upon information and belief based upon the conversation and observation as aforesaid I aver that the DEFENDANT is not in the military service of the State of New York or the United States as that term is defined in the statutes of the State of New York or the Federal Soldiers and Sailors Civil Relief Act.
54
+
55
+ DEPONENT STATED AT THE TIME OF SERVICE HE HAD LEG APERS IN A FLORIDA ACTION. r
56
+
57
+ Sworn to before me is
58
+
59
+ 12th day of May, 2008ni
60
+
61
+ SAMSON
62
+
63
+ Notary Public, St
64
+
65
+ No.01NE-4783767
66
+
67
+ Qualified in NEW YORK COUNTY
68
+
69
+ Commission Expires 11/03/2009
70
+
71
+ TORR AETNA CENT 225 BROADWAY, NEW YORK, NY, Reference No: 0915257 JUDICIAL SERVICES SUITE 1802 10007 3HM4124083
marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740347/EFTA02740347.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740347.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 1,
15
+ "chars": 2610,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 1.98,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [],
20
+ "page_stats": [
21
+ {
22
+ "page_id": 0,
23
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
24
+ "block_counts": [
25
+ [
26
+ "Span",
27
+ 174
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ "Line",
31
+ 72
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ "Text",
35
+ 39
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ "PageHeader",
39
+ 1
40
+ ],
41
+ [
42
+ "PageFooter",
43
+ 1
44
+ ]
45
+ ],
46
+ "block_metadata": {
47
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
48
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
49
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
50
+ "previous_text": "",
51
+ "previous_type": "",
52
+ "previous_order": 0
53
+ }
54
+ }
55
+ ],
56
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02740347"
57
+ }
58
+ }
marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740348/EFTA02740348.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ • Form 42 =mom WITH MILITARY
2
+
3
+ HERMAN & MERMELSTEIN PA
4
+
5
+ ATTN:
6
+
7
+ U.S.SOUTHERN DIST. COURT FLORIDA COUNTY
8
+
9
+ JANE DOE NO.4 'plaintiff
10
+
11
+ - against -
12
+
13
+ JEFFREY EPSTEIN defendant
14
+
15
+ Index No. 08CV80380
16
+
17
+ Date Filed
18
+
19
+ Office No.
20
+
21
+ Court Date: / /
22
+
23
+ STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF NEW YORK :SS:
24
+
25
+ HARRY being duly sworn, deposes and says; I am over 18 years of age, not a party to this action, and reside in the State of New York. That on the 7th day of May, 2008 07:45 AM at
26
+
27
+ 9 EAST 71ST ST
28
+
29
+ NEW YORK, NY 10021
30
+
31
+ I served the SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT
32
+
33
+ after prior attempts were made on: 04/23/2008 06:15 PH 04/24/2008 02:30 PN 05/01/2008 06:27PD upon JEFFREY EPSTEIN
34
+
35
+ the DEFENDANT therein named by delivering and leaving a true copy or copies of the aforementioned documents with
36
+
37
+ "JOHN ", ASSISTANT & HOUSE STAFF EMPLOYEE WHO
38
+
39
+ REFUSED TRUE NAME
40
+
41
+ a person of suitable age and discretion, who refused access to DEFENDANT'S actual apartment, and accepted in accordance with his/her everyday duties.
42
+
43
+ Deponent describes the person served as aforesaid to the best of deponent's ability at the time and circumstances of the service as follows:
44
+
45
+ SEX: MALE COLOR: HAIR: AGE: 45 HEIGHT: 6:0 WEIGHT: 200
46
+
47
+ OTHER IDENTIFYING FEATURES: MUSTACHE/BEARD
48
+
49
+ 9x05212/2008 -L-deposited inoabaUmired-States-naLL-a-true.top\*-of-them.a4eaemest4oaea- mdocumenta\_propstli"anconoad.and-aaalad-in-a-postapaid-arrapper--addressed-to-the-said DEFENDANT at the-about-address fllhat-addrossm4ming--
50
+
51
+ 1aalicnnmmiLauesidence., 11enal -place-4afahod.a.o.E-4116e--E4NgENMANT.
52
+
53
+ -Capy-mailed-lat-oaaas-maii-maraed-persertal freottelentietl-not indieeting-ert-ae-iabsids.4.Usseot Iay-rarwrasddxeaa..ar-atherwise-that-said-netics4s-f.saa-asattvaxney-onaae•raa-aot4e\*-aga4met \_the.4harsha..tia.haamammaL 1,\* & 5/5/08 9:20PN
54
+
55
+ That at the time of service as aforesaid, I asked person spoken to whether DEFENDANT was in the military service of the State of New York or United States and received a negative reply. Upon information and belief based upon the conversation and observation as aforesaid I aver that the DEFENDANT is not in the military service of the State of New York or the United States as that term is defined in the statutes of the State of New York or the Federal Soldiers and Sailors Civil Relief Act.
56
+
57
+ DEPONENT STATED AT THE TIME OF SERVICE HE HAD LEG 'APERS IN A FLORIDA ACTION.
58
+
59
+ Sworn to before me is 12th day of May, 2008ni
60
+
61
+ SAMSON Notary Public, St No.01NE-4783767
62
+
63
+ Qualified in NEW YORK COUNTY Commission Expires 11/03/2009
64
+
65
+ TO AETNA C 225 BROADWAY, NEW YORK, NY, Reference No: 0915257 JUDICIAL SERVICES SUITE 1802 10007 3HM4124083
66
+
67
+ ![](_page_0_Picture_36.jpeg)
68
+
69
+ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
70
+ SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
71
+
72
+ CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRA/ [REDACTED]
73
+
74
+ JANE DOE NO. 4,
75
+
76
+ Plaintiff,
77
+
78
+ vs.
79
+
80
+ JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
81
+
82
+ Defendant.
83
+
84
+ \_\_\_\_\_/
85
+
86
+ **NON-MILITARY AFFIDAVIT**
87
+
88
+ STATE OF FLORIDA )
89
+ ) SS:
90
+ COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE )
91
+
92
+ **BEFORE ME**, the undersigned authority, personally appeared ADAM D. HOROWITZ, ESQ., an attorney of record for the Plaintiff, who is personally known to me, and who after first being duly sworn, deposes and says on personal knowledge that Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, is not on active duty in the armed forces of the United States.
93
+
94
+ ![]()Sworn to and subscribed before me this 29 day of May, 2008.
95
+
96
+ ![]()My Commission expires:
97
+
98
+ ![](_page_1_Picture_127.jpeg)
99
+
100
+ Lisa [REDACTED]
101
+ Commission #DD417062
102
+ Expires: APR. 11, 2009
103
+ www.AARONNOTARY.com
104
+
105
+ ![](_page_1_Picture_130.jpeg)
marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740348/EFTA02740348.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,155 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740348.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 2,
15
+ "chars": 3461,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 5.48,
17
+ "image_assets": [
18
+ "_page_0_Picture_36.jpeg",
19
+ "_page_1_Picture_127.jpeg",
20
+ "_page_1_Picture_130.jpeg"
21
+ ],
22
+ "marker_metadata": {
23
+ "table_of_contents": [
24
+ {
25
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
26
+ "heading_level": null,
27
+ "page_id": 1,
28
+ "polygon": [
29
+ [
30
+ 207.194,
31
+ 86.777
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 405.193,
35
+ 86.777
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 405.193,
39
+ 113.53999999999999
40
+ ],
41
+ [
42
+ 207.194,
43
+ 113.53999999999999
44
+ ]
45
+ ]
46
+ },
47
+ {
48
+ "title": "NON-MILITARY AFFIDAVIT",
49
+ "heading_level": null,
50
+ "page_id": 1,
51
+ "polygon": [
52
+ [
53
+ 222.51899999999998,
54
+ 299.259
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 389.86799999999994,
58
+ 299.259
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 389.86799999999994,
62
+ 313.046
63
+ ],
64
+ [
65
+ 222.51899999999998,
66
+ 313.046
67
+ ]
68
+ ]
69
+ }
70
+ ],
71
+ "page_stats": [
72
+ {
73
+ "page_id": 0,
74
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
75
+ "block_counts": [
76
+ [
77
+ "Span",
78
+ 158
79
+ ],
80
+ [
81
+ "Line",
82
+ 65
83
+ ],
84
+ [
85
+ "Text",
86
+ 35
87
+ ],
88
+ [
89
+ "PageHeader",
90
+ 2
91
+ ],
92
+ [
93
+ "Picture",
94
+ 1
95
+ ],
96
+ [
97
+ "PageFooter",
98
+ 1
99
+ ]
100
+ ],
101
+ "block_metadata": {
102
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
103
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
104
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
105
+ "previous_text": "",
106
+ "previous_type": "",
107
+ "previous_order": 0
108
+ }
109
+ },
110
+ {
111
+ "page_id": 1,
112
+ "text_extraction_method": "surya",
113
+ "block_counts": [
114
+ [
115
+ "Span",
116
+ 61
117
+ ],
118
+ [
119
+ "Text",
120
+ 32
121
+ ],
122
+ [
123
+ "Line",
124
+ 28
125
+ ],
126
+ [
127
+ "SectionHeader",
128
+ 4
129
+ ],
130
+ [
131
+ "Picture",
132
+ 4
133
+ ],
134
+ [
135
+ "PageHeader",
136
+ 2
137
+ ],
138
+ [
139
+ "PageFooter",
140
+ 2
141
+ ]
142
+ ],
143
+ "block_metadata": {
144
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
145
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
146
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
147
+ "previous_text": "",
148
+ "previous_type": "",
149
+ "previous_order": 0
150
+ }
151
+ }
152
+ ],
153
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02740348"
154
+ }
155
+ }
marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740348/_page_0_Picture_36.jpeg ADDED

Git LFS Details

  • SHA256: 69c3b40695d6dfa010a59455ed82110e842195678d72858a9fd4e7914b8e1855
  • Pointer size: 130 Bytes
  • Size of remote file: 13.1 kB
marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740348/_page_1_Picture_127.jpeg ADDED

Git LFS Details

  • SHA256: 8df0623b34423d5dee71c4f98fda93259c13faf4846307d83a78ac352e2c13a6
  • Pointer size: 129 Bytes
  • Size of remote file: 4.8 kB
marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740348/_page_1_Picture_130.jpeg ADDED

Git LFS Details

  • SHA256: adbbf94037048898619609b40c47561d2e00418f19667fb0aa6279544b24e14e
  • Pointer size: 130 Bytes
  • Size of remote file: 12.4 kB
marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740350/EFTA02740350.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
2
+
3
+ CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRA
4
+
5
+ JANE DOE NO. 4,
6
+
7
+ Plaintiff, vs.
8
+
9
+ JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
10
+
11
+ Defendant.
12
+
13
+ ## DEFAULT
14
+
15
+ It appearing that the Defendant Jeffrey Epstein is in Default for failure to plead or otherwise defend as required by law, Default is hereby entered as against the said Defendant this day of May, 2008.
16
+
17
+ CLERK OF COURT
marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740350/EFTA02740350.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740350.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 1,
15
+ "chars": 383,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 0.86,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 206.856,
27
+ 85.85999999999999
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 405.95098876953125,
31
+ 85.85999999999999
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 405.95098876953125,
35
+ 115.4830322265625
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 206.856,
39
+ 115.4830322265625
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "DEFAULT",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 275.4,
50
+ 296.46
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 337.87054443359375,
54
+ 296.46
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 337.87054443359375,
58
+ 310.863037109375
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 275.4,
62
+ 310.863037109375
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ }
66
+ ],
67
+ "page_stats": [
68
+ {
69
+ "page_id": 0,
70
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
71
+ "block_counts": [
72
+ [
73
+ "Span",
74
+ 31
75
+ ],
76
+ [
77
+ "Line",
78
+ 16
79
+ ],
80
+ [
81
+ "Text",
82
+ 7
83
+ ],
84
+ [
85
+ "PageFooter",
86
+ 4
87
+ ],
88
+ [
89
+ "SectionHeader",
90
+ 2
91
+ ],
92
+ [
93
+ "PageHeader",
94
+ 1
95
+ ]
96
+ ],
97
+ "block_metadata": {
98
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
99
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
100
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
101
+ "previous_text": "",
102
+ "previous_type": "",
103
+ "previous_order": 0
104
+ }
105
+ }
106
+ ],
107
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02740350"
108
+ }
109
+ }
marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740351/EFTA02740351.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
2
+
3
+ CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRA
4
+
5
+ JANE DOE NO. 4,
6
+
7
+ Plaintiff, vs.
8
+
9
+ JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
10
+
11
+ Defendant.
12
+
13
+ ## PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT AGAINST DEFENDANT
14
+
15
+ Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 4, by and through her undersigned counsel, and pursuant to the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a) and S.D. Fla. L.R. 7.1, hereby files this Motion for Entry of Default Against Defendant, and states as follows:
16
+
17
+ - I. On May 7, 2008, Defendant Jeffrey Epstein was served with a Summons and Complaint in this case. A copy of the Affidavit of Service is attached hereto as Exhibit "A".
18
+ - 2. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a)(1), Defendant was required to answer or otherwise serve a response to the Complaint on or before May 27, 2008.
19
+ - 3. To date, Defendant has neither answered the Complaint, filed a response of any kind, nor requested an enlargement of time. Moreover, no attorney has entered an appearance on behalf of the Defendant.
20
+ - 4. The Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein is not on active duty in the armed forces of the United States. See Exhibit "B".
21
+ - 5. Accordingly, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a), Plaintiff applies to this Honorable Court for the entry of default judgment against the Defendant.
22
+
23
+ WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, JANE DOE NO. 4, respectfully requests this Court to grant this motion in favor of Plaintiff and enter a default against Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN.
24
+
25
+ Dated: May 29, 2008. Respectfully submitted,
26
+
27
+ By: s/ Adam D. Horowitz Jeffrey M. Herman (FL Bar No. 521647) iherman@hermanlaw.com Stuart S. Mermelstein (FL Bar No. 947245) ssm@hermanlaw.com Adam D. Horowitz (FL Bar No. 376980) ahorowitz@hermanlaw.com HERMAN & MERMELSTEIN, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiffs Jane Doe 18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160 Tel: 305-931-2200 Fax: 305-931-0877
28
+
29
+ ## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
30
+
31
+ I hereby certify that on May 29, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day to all parties on the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CWECF or in some other authorized manner for those parties who are not authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing.
32
+
33
+ /s/ Adam D. Horowitz
34
+
35
+ ## SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRA/ United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
36
+
37
+ Jeffrey Epstein (Via Regular Mail) 9 East 71st Street New York, NY 10021
38
+
39
+ /s/ Adam D. Horowitz
marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740351/EFTA02740351.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,239 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740351.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 3,
15
+ "chars": 2599,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 0.78,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 206.24400000000003,
27
+ 85.85999999999999
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 405.95098876953125,
31
+ 85.85999999999999
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 405.95098876953125,
35
+ 115.4830322265625
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 206.24400000000003,
39
+ 115.4830322265625
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ENTRY \nOF DEFAULT AGAINST DEFENDANT",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 197.06400000000002,
50
+ 295.65
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 415.0776062011719,
54
+ 295.65
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 415.0776062011719,
58
+ 325.10302734375
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 197.06400000000002,
62
+ 325.10302734375
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ },
66
+ {
67
+ "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
68
+ "heading_level": null,
69
+ "page_id": 1,
70
+ "polygon": [
71
+ [
72
+ 227.052,
73
+ 447.93
74
+ ],
75
+ [
76
+ 385.0019836425781,
77
+ 447.93
78
+ ],
79
+ [
80
+ 385.0019836425781,
81
+ 462.363037109375
82
+ ],
83
+ [
84
+ 227.052,
85
+ 462.363037109375
86
+ ]
87
+ ]
88
+ },
89
+ {
90
+ "title": "SERVICE LIST \nDOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN \nCASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRA/ \nUnited States District Court, Southern District of Florida",
91
+ "heading_level": null,
92
+ "page_id": 2,
93
+ "polygon": [
94
+ [
95
+ 157.28400000000002,
96
+ 85.05
97
+ ],
98
+ [
99
+ 455.1346740722656,
100
+ 85.05
101
+ ],
102
+ [
103
+ 455.1346740722656,
104
+ 143.68353271484375
105
+ ],
106
+ [
107
+ 157.28400000000002,
108
+ 143.68353271484375
109
+ ]
110
+ ]
111
+ }
112
+ ],
113
+ "page_stats": [
114
+ {
115
+ "page_id": 0,
116
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
117
+ "block_counts": [
118
+ [
119
+ "Span",
120
+ 55
121
+ ],
122
+ [
123
+ "Line",
124
+ 28
125
+ ],
126
+ [
127
+ "Text",
128
+ 8
129
+ ],
130
+ [
131
+ "ListItem",
132
+ 5
133
+ ],
134
+ [
135
+ "SectionHeader",
136
+ 2
137
+ ],
138
+ [
139
+ "PageFooter",
140
+ 2
141
+ ],
142
+ [
143
+ "PageHeader",
144
+ 1
145
+ ],
146
+ [
147
+ "ListGroup",
148
+ 1
149
+ ]
150
+ ],
151
+ "block_metadata": {
152
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
153
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
154
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
155
+ "previous_text": "",
156
+ "previous_type": "",
157
+ "previous_order": 0
158
+ }
159
+ },
160
+ {
161
+ "page_id": 1,
162
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
163
+ "block_counts": [
164
+ [
165
+ "Span",
166
+ 53
167
+ ],
168
+ [
169
+ "Line",
170
+ 27
171
+ ],
172
+ [
173
+ "Text",
174
+ 6
175
+ ],
176
+ [
177
+ "PageFooter",
178
+ 4
179
+ ],
180
+ [
181
+ "PageHeader",
182
+ 1
183
+ ],
184
+ [
185
+ "SectionHeader",
186
+ 1
187
+ ]
188
+ ],
189
+ "block_metadata": {
190
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
191
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
192
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
193
+ "previous_text": "",
194
+ "previous_type": "",
195
+ "previous_order": 0
196
+ }
197
+ },
198
+ {
199
+ "page_id": 2,
200
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
201
+ "block_counts": [
202
+ [
203
+ "Span",
204
+ 26
205
+ ],
206
+ [
207
+ "Line",
208
+ 12
209
+ ],
210
+ [
211
+ "PageFooter",
212
+ 4
213
+ ],
214
+ [
215
+ "Text",
216
+ 2
217
+ ],
218
+ [
219
+ "PageHeader",
220
+ 1
221
+ ],
222
+ [
223
+ "SectionHeader",
224
+ 1
225
+ ]
226
+ ],
227
+ "block_metadata": {
228
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
229
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
230
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
231
+ "previous_text": "",
232
+ "previous_type": "",
233
+ "previous_order": 0
234
+ }
235
+ }
236
+ ],
237
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02740351"
238
+ }
239
+ }
marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740354/EFTA02740354.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
2
+
3
+ ## CLERK'S DEFAULT
4
+
5
+ CASE NO. 9:08-cv-80380-KAM
6
+
7
+ Jane Doe No. 4
8
+
9
+ I
10
+
11
+ Plaintiff(s),
12
+
13
+ v.
14
+
15
+ Jeffrey Epstein
16
+
17
+ Defendant(s).
18
+
19
+ /
20
+
21
+ It appearing that the defendant(s) herein,Jeffrey Epstein , is in default for failure to appear, answer or otherwise plead to the complaint filed herein within the time required by law. Default is hereby entered against defendant(s) Jeffrey Epstein , as of course, on this date June 2, 2008 .
22
+
23
+ > STEVEN M. LARIMORE CLERK OF COURT
24
+
25
+ By: khlai Israa1
26
+
27
+ Deputy Clerk
28
+
29
+ cc: Hon.
marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740354/EFTA02740354.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740354.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 1,
15
+ "chars": 554,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 0.9,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 201.96000000000004,
27
+ 47.79
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 413.93896484375,
31
+ 47.79
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 413.93896484375,
35
+ 74.20416259765625
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 201.96000000000004,
39
+ 74.20416259765625
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "CLERK'S DEFAULT",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 249.08399999999997,
50
+ 99.63
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 367.45867919921875,
54
+ 99.63
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 367.45867919921875,
58
+ 112.83416748046875
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 249.08399999999997,
62
+ 112.83416748046875
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ }
66
+ ],
67
+ "page_stats": [
68
+ {
69
+ "page_id": 0,
70
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
71
+ "block_counts": [
72
+ [
73
+ "Span",
74
+ 49
75
+ ],
76
+ [
77
+ "Line",
78
+ 24
79
+ ],
80
+ [
81
+ "Text",
82
+ 15
83
+ ],
84
+ [
85
+ "SectionHeader",
86
+ 2
87
+ ],
88
+ [
89
+ "PageHeader",
90
+ 1
91
+ ],
92
+ [
93
+ "PageFooter",
94
+ 1
95
+ ]
96
+ ],
97
+ "block_metadata": {
98
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
99
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
100
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
101
+ "previous_text": "",
102
+ "previous_type": "",
103
+ "previous_order": 0
104
+ }
105
+ }
106
+ ],
107
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02740354"
108
+ }
109
+ }
marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740355/EFTA02740355.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
2
+
3
+ CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRA/JOHNSON
4
+
5
+ JANE DOE NO. 4,
6
+
7
+ Plaintiff, vs.
8
+
9
+ JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
10
+
11
+ Defendant.
12
+
13
+ ## JPROPOSED1 ORDER
14
+
15
+ Upon Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment Upon Default and Order Setting Hearing on Damages, and good cause being shown it is hereby
16
+
17
+ ORDERED that
18
+
19
+ - I. A hearing before a jury to assess damages shall be held on
20
+
21
+ - 2. Upon determination by the jury of the amount of damages, judgment shall be entered
22
+
23
+ for the Plaintiff and against the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, for the amounts assessed by the jury and for costs of suit, without further hearing or order of this Court.
24
+
25
+ DONE AND ORDERED in in Ft. Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida, this day of 2008.
26
+
27
+ DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740355/EFTA02740355.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740355.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 1,
15
+ "chars": 754,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 0.78,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 205.02,
27
+ 86.67
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 405.95098876953125,
31
+ 86.67
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 405.95098876953125,
35
+ 115.4830322265625
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 205.02,
39
+ 115.4830322265625
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "JPROPOSED1 ORDER",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 242.964,
50
+ 296.46
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 369.05316162109375,
54
+ 296.46
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 369.05316162109375,
58
+ 310.863037109375
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 242.964,
62
+ 310.863037109375
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ }
66
+ ],
67
+ "page_stats": [
68
+ {
69
+ "page_id": 0,
70
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
71
+ "block_counts": [
72
+ [
73
+ "Span",
74
+ 41
75
+ ],
76
+ [
77
+ "Line",
78
+ 21
79
+ ],
80
+ [
81
+ "Text",
82
+ 11
83
+ ],
84
+ [
85
+ "SectionHeader",
86
+ 2
87
+ ],
88
+ [
89
+ "ListGroup",
90
+ 2
91
+ ],
92
+ [
93
+ "ListItem",
94
+ 2
95
+ ],
96
+ [
97
+ "PageHeader",
98
+ 1
99
+ ],
100
+ [
101
+ "PageFooter",
102
+ 1
103
+ ]
104
+ ],
105
+ "block_metadata": {
106
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
107
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
108
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
109
+ "previous_text": "",
110
+ "previous_type": "",
111
+ "previous_order": 0
112
+ }
113
+ }
114
+ ],
115
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02740355"
116
+ }
117
+ }
marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740356/EFTA02740356.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
2
+
3
+ CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRA
4
+
5
+ JANE DOE NO. 4,
6
+
7
+ Plaintiff, vs.
8
+
9
+ JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
10
+
11
+ Defendant.
12
+
13
+ ## PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT UPON DEFAULT AND ORDER SETTING HEARING ON DAMAGES
14
+
15
+ Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 4, by and through undersigned counsel, files this Motion for Judgment Upon Default and Order Setting Hearing on Damages, pursuant to So.Dist.Fla.L.R. 7.1(A)(1)(e) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 55(b)(2), and states as follows:
16
+
17
+ - 1. A Clerk's Default was entered against Defendant Jeffrey Epstein in this action on June 2, 2008.
18
+ - 2. This action is for damages arising from sexual assault committed upon the Plaintiff by Defendant Jeffrey Epstein. The sole issue to be determined prior to final judgment in this action is the amount of damages sustained by Plaintiff.
19
+ - 3. Plaintiff requests a hearing before a jury to determine the amount of damages, consistent with the demand for jury trial made in the Complaint filed in this case. The Plaintiff s damages are unliquidated, and are alleged in the Complaint to consist of severe and permanent traumatic injuries, including mental, psychological and emotional damages. (See Complaint 119; see alsoll 14, 24). Additionally, Plaintiff requests punitive damages.
20
+ - 4. Plaintiff is entitled to have a jury assess damages and determine the amounts of
21
+
22
+ compensatory and punitive damages. Plaintiff anticipates that the evidence at the hearing to assess the amounts of damages will include the testimony of the Plaintiff, her family members, expert and treating psychologists, an expert economist and other victims of Epstein. These other victims of Epstein were sexually assaulted under similar facts and circumstances, and their testimony is relevant to the amount of punitive damages.
23
+
24
+ 5. Plaintiff requests a 2-3 day hearing for the purpose of presenting damages evidence to the jury and having the jury determine damages.
25
+
26
+ WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that a default judgment be entered; the amounts set forth in the judgment be assessed by a jury after hearing; and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper.
27
+
28
+ Dated: June 5, 2008. Respectfully submitted,
29
+
30
+ By: s/ Adam D. Horowitz Jeffrey M. Herman (FL Bar No. 521647) iherman@hermanlaw.com Stuart S. Mermelstein (FL Bar No. 947245) ssm@hermanlaw.com Adam D. Horowitz (FL Bar No. 376980) ahorowitz@hermanlaw.com HERMAN & MERMELSTEIN, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiffs Jane Doe 18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160 Tel: 305-931-2200 Fax: 305-931-0877
31
+
32
+ ## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
33
+
34
+ I hereby certify that on June 5, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day to all parties on the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those parties who are not authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing.
35
+
36
+ /s/ Adam D. Horowitz .
37
+
38
+ ## SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRa United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
39
+
40
+ Jeffrey Epstein (Via Regular Mail) 9 East 71st Street New York, NY 10021
41
+
42
+ /s/ Adam D. Horowitz
marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740356/EFTA02740356.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,273 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740356.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 4,
15
+ "chars": 3300,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 0.85,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 206.24400000000003,
27
+ 85.85999999999999
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 405.95098876953125,
31
+ 85.85999999999999
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 405.95098876953125,
35
+ 115.4830322265625
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 206.24400000000003,
39
+ 115.4830322265625
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT UPON DEFAULT \nAND ORDER SETTING HEARING ON DAMAGES",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 140.148,
50
+ 295.65
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 472.49053955078125,
54
+ 295.65
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 472.49053955078125,
58
+ 325.10302734375
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 140.148,
62
+ 325.10302734375
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ },
66
+ {
67
+ "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
68
+ "heading_level": null,
69
+ "page_id": 1,
70
+ "polygon": [
71
+ [
72
+ 227.052,
73
+ 682.8299999999999
74
+ ],
75
+ [
76
+ 385.0019836425781,
77
+ 682.8299999999999
78
+ ],
79
+ [
80
+ 385.0019836425781,
81
+ 698.2330169677734
82
+ ],
83
+ [
84
+ 227.052,
85
+ 698.2330169677734
86
+ ]
87
+ ]
88
+ },
89
+ {
90
+ "title": "SERVICE LIST \nDOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN \nCASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRa \nUnited States District Court, Southern District of Florida",
91
+ "heading_level": null,
92
+ "page_id": 3,
93
+ "polygon": [
94
+ [
95
+ 157.28400000000002,
96
+ 85.05
97
+ ],
98
+ [
99
+ 455.6502685546875,
100
+ 85.05
101
+ ],
102
+ [
103
+ 455.6502685546875,
104
+ 143.9830322265625
105
+ ],
106
+ [
107
+ 157.28400000000002,
108
+ 143.9830322265625
109
+ ]
110
+ ]
111
+ }
112
+ ],
113
+ "page_stats": [
114
+ {
115
+ "page_id": 0,
116
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
117
+ "block_counts": [
118
+ [
119
+ "Span",
120
+ 56
121
+ ],
122
+ [
123
+ "Line",
124
+ 28
125
+ ],
126
+ [
127
+ "Text",
128
+ 8
129
+ ],
130
+ [
131
+ "ListItem",
132
+ 4
133
+ ],
134
+ [
135
+ "SectionHeader",
136
+ 2
137
+ ],
138
+ [
139
+ "PageFooter",
140
+ 2
141
+ ],
142
+ [
143
+ "PageHeader",
144
+ 1
145
+ ],
146
+ [
147
+ "ListGroup",
148
+ 1
149
+ ]
150
+ ],
151
+ "block_metadata": {
152
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
153
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
154
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
155
+ "previous_text": "",
156
+ "previous_type": "",
157
+ "previous_order": 0
158
+ }
159
+ },
160
+ {
161
+ "page_id": 1,
162
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
163
+ "block_counts": [
164
+ [
165
+ "Span",
166
+ 57
167
+ ],
168
+ [
169
+ "Line",
170
+ 29
171
+ ],
172
+ [
173
+ "Text",
174
+ 8
175
+ ],
176
+ [
177
+ "PageFooter",
178
+ 2
179
+ ],
180
+ [
181
+ "PageHeader",
182
+ 1
183
+ ],
184
+ [
185
+ "SectionHeader",
186
+ 1
187
+ ]
188
+ ],
189
+ "block_metadata": {
190
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
191
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
192
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
193
+ "previous_text": "",
194
+ "previous_type": "",
195
+ "previous_order": 0
196
+ }
197
+ },
198
+ {
199
+ "page_id": 2,
200
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
201
+ "block_counts": [
202
+ [
203
+ "Span",
204
+ 17
205
+ ],
206
+ [
207
+ "Line",
208
+ 9
209
+ ],
210
+ [
211
+ "PageFooter",
212
+ 4
213
+ ],
214
+ [
215
+ "Text",
216
+ 2
217
+ ],
218
+ [
219
+ "PageHeader",
220
+ 1
221
+ ]
222
+ ],
223
+ "block_metadata": {
224
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
225
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
226
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
227
+ "previous_text": "",
228
+ "previous_type": "",
229
+ "previous_order": 0
230
+ }
231
+ },
232
+ {
233
+ "page_id": 3,
234
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
235
+ "block_counts": [
236
+ [
237
+ "Span",
238
+ 25
239
+ ],
240
+ [
241
+ "Line",
242
+ 12
243
+ ],
244
+ [
245
+ "PageFooter",
246
+ 4
247
+ ],
248
+ [
249
+ "Text",
250
+ 2
251
+ ],
252
+ [
253
+ "PageHeader",
254
+ 1
255
+ ],
256
+ [
257
+ "SectionHeader",
258
+ 1
259
+ ]
260
+ ],
261
+ "block_metadata": {
262
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
263
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
264
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
265
+ "previous_text": "",
266
+ "previous_type": "",
267
+ "previous_order": 0
268
+ }
269
+ }
270
+ ],
271
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02740356"
272
+ }
273
+ }
marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740360/EFTA02740360.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ## IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
2
+
3
+ CASE NO.:08-CV-80232-MARRA-..=
4
+
5
+ JANE DOE NO. 3,
6
+
7
+ Plaintiff, vs.
8
+
9
+ JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
10
+
11
+ Defendant.
12
+
13
+ ## NOTICE OF FILING PERMANENT APPEARANCE
14
+
15
+ The Clerk of Court shall enter the appearance of the undersigned counsel for JEFFREY EPSTEIN, in the above-entitled cause.
16
+
17
+ DATED: June 13, 2008
18
+
19
+ I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy hereof has been furnished to Jeffrey M. Herman, Esquire, Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esquire and Adam D. Horowitz, Esq., Herman & Mermelstein, P.A., 18205 Biscayne Blvd, Suite 2218, Miami, Florida, 33160 this 13th day of June, 2008.
20
+
21
+ > ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER & WEISS, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 659-8300 Fax: (561)835-8691
22
+
23
+ /s/Jack A. Goldberger. Esq. JACK A. GOLDBERGER, ESQUIRE Florida Bar No. 262013
marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740360/EFTA02740360.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740360.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 1,
15
+ "chars": 849,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 0.67,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 175.74,
27
+ 74.52
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 413.898,
31
+ 74.52
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 413.898,
35
+ 102.718017578125
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 175.74,
39
+ 102.718017578125
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "NOTICE OF FILING PERMANENT APPEARANCE",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 153.318,
50
+ 302.94
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 433.896,
54
+ 302.94
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 433.896,
58
+ 317.52
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 153.318,
62
+ 317.52
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ }
66
+ ],
67
+ "page_stats": [
68
+ {
69
+ "page_id": 0,
70
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
71
+ "block_counts": [
72
+ [
73
+ "Span",
74
+ 53
75
+ ],
76
+ [
77
+ "Line",
78
+ 26
79
+ ],
80
+ [
81
+ "Text",
82
+ 10
83
+ ],
84
+ [
85
+ "SectionHeader",
86
+ 2
87
+ ],
88
+ [
89
+ "PageHeader",
90
+ 1
91
+ ],
92
+ [
93
+ "PageFooter",
94
+ 1
95
+ ]
96
+ ],
97
+ "block_metadata": {
98
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
99
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
100
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
101
+ "previous_text": "",
102
+ "previous_type": "",
103
+ "previous_order": 0
104
+ }
105
+ }
106
+ ],
107
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02740360"
108
+ }
109
+ }
marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740361/EFTA02740361.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ## EXHIBIT A
2
+
3
+ **AFFIDAVIT OF RICHARD BARNETT**
4
+
5
+ I, Richard Barnett, being duly sworn, do depose and state as follows:
6
+
7
+ 1. 1. I am over the age of 18, am otherwise competent to testify and base the following on my personal knowledge.
8
+ 2. 2. On May 7, 2008, I received copies of the summons and complaint in four lawsuits:
9
+ 1. a. Jane Doe #2 v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 08-CV-80119,
10
+ 2. b. Jane Doe #3 v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 08-CV-80232,
11
+ 3. c. Jane Doe #4 v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 08-CV-80380, and
12
+ 4. d. Jane Doe #5 v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 08-CV-80381.
13
+ 3. 3. I do not now, nor have I ever resided at 9 East 71st Street, New York, New York.
14
+
15
+ FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NAUGHT.
16
+
17
+ ![]()Sworn and subscribed before me
18
+ this 12<sup>th</sup> day of June 2008 by
19
+ Richard Barnett, who
20
+ is personally known to me. I or did provide
21
+ as identification.
22
+
23
+ ![]()MY COMMISSION EXPIRES:
24
+
25
+ LAUREN J. KWINTNER
26
+ Notary Public, State of New York
27
+ No. 02KW6016686
28
+ Qualified in New York County
29
+ Commission Expires November 30, 20 10
marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740361/EFTA02740361.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,147 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740361.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 2,
15
+ "chars": 1037,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 4.65,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "EXHIBIT A",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 204.18,
27
+ 318.6531066894531
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 404.5699768066406,
31
+ 318.6531066894531
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 404.5699768066406,
35
+ 360.05908203125
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 204.18,
39
+ 360.05908203125
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "AFFIDAVIT OF RICHARD BARNETT",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 1,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 178.12,
50
+ 86.67
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 419.07000000000005,
54
+ 86.67
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 419.07000000000005,
58
+ 102.06
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 178.12,
62
+ 102.06
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ }
66
+ ],
67
+ "page_stats": [
68
+ {
69
+ "page_id": 0,
70
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
71
+ "block_counts": [
72
+ [
73
+ "Span",
74
+ 5
75
+ ],
76
+ [
77
+ "Line",
78
+ 3
79
+ ],
80
+ [
81
+ "PageHeader",
82
+ 1
83
+ ],
84
+ [
85
+ "SectionHeader",
86
+ 1
87
+ ],
88
+ [
89
+ "PageFooter",
90
+ 1
91
+ ]
92
+ ],
93
+ "block_metadata": {
94
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
95
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
96
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
97
+ "previous_text": "",
98
+ "previous_type": "",
99
+ "previous_order": 0
100
+ }
101
+ },
102
+ {
103
+ "page_id": 1,
104
+ "text_extraction_method": "surya",
105
+ "block_counts": [
106
+ [
107
+ "Span",
108
+ 56
109
+ ],
110
+ [
111
+ "Line",
112
+ 27
113
+ ],
114
+ [
115
+ "Text",
116
+ 14
117
+ ],
118
+ [
119
+ "PageHeader",
120
+ 2
121
+ ],
122
+ [
123
+ "SectionHeader",
124
+ 2
125
+ ],
126
+ [
127
+ "ListGroup",
128
+ 2
129
+ ],
130
+ [
131
+ "PageFooter",
132
+ 2
133
+ ]
134
+ ],
135
+ "block_metadata": {
136
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
137
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
138
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
139
+ "previous_text": "",
140
+ "previous_type": "",
141
+ "previous_order": 0
142
+ }
143
+ }
144
+ ],
145
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02740361"
146
+ }
147
+ }
marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740363/EFTA02740363.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,137 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
2
+
3
+ CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRA-
4
+
5
+ JANE DOE NO. 4,
6
+
7
+ Plaintiff,
8
+
9
+ vs.
10
+
11
+ JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
12
+
13
+ Defendant.
14
+
15
+ /
16
+
17
+ ## MOTION TO SET ASIDE CLERK'S DEFAULT
18
+
19
+ Defendant Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(c), hereby moves to set aside the clerk's default entered on June 2, 2008, upon the following showing of "good cause."
20
+
21
+ #### Introduction
22
+
23
+ The clerk's default was entered prematurely. Service was effected as of June 2. Accordingly the response is due 20 days later, on or before June 23. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1)(A)(i).
24
+
25
+ The plaintiff, in moving for a clerk's default, implied that service was made in accordance with either federal or Florida procedure. As discussed below, however, service was clearly ineffective under the federal and Florida rules of procedure. Accordingly, the only possibility for valid service was service under New York rules of procedure. Cf. RCP's Lear, LLC v. Taughannock Aviation Corp., No. 5:07-CV-96, 2008 WL 305103, at \*4 (N.D.N.Y. Jan. 31, 2008) (observing that "[a]s a threshold matter, the court must [first] address the rules pursuant to which process was served").
26
+
27
+ Service of process was valid under New York's rule for so-called "substitute-service" (i.e., service in a manner other than delivery in-hand to the defendant herself or himself), but that statute gives the defendant more time to respond than do the federal or Florida rules. See id. (acknowledging that Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(e)(2) has a "'resided therein' requirement," unlike "New York's substituted service statute," NY CPLR 308); NY CPLR 308 (providing that service is not deemed effected until 10 days after the process-server's affidavit is filed with the Court).
28
+
29
+ This is not a motion to quash, or a motion arguing that service was completely ineffective. To the contrary, we acknowledge that service was effective under New York procedure, but point out that it was ineffective under Florida and federal procedure. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(e)(1) permits service to be made according to "state law for serving a summons in . . . the state . . . where service is made" as an alternative to following the federal service method (i.e., Rule 4(e)(2)).
30
+
31
+ As shown below, under New York's so-called "substituted-service" rule, service was effected on June 2, not May 7 (as the plaintiff and the deputy clerk of court evidently believed). Accordingly, the defendant's response to the complaint is not due until June 23. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1)(A)(i) (allowing 20 days from the date of service of process to serve answer),I
32
+
33
+ ### Facts and Procedural History
34
+
35
+ 1. On May 7, 2008, service was delivered at defendant Epstein's house located at 9 East 71st Street, New York, New York, to Richard Barnett, an employee.
36
+
37
+ 2. Mr. Barnett does not reside at that address. See Affidavit of Richard Barnett (attached as Ex. A).
38
+
39
+ 3. Upon the plaintiff's motion? the Clerk of Court entered a clerk's default on June 2, 2008. [D.E. 7, 8].
40
+
41
+ 4. On June 6, the plaintiff filed a motion for judgment upon default.3 [D.E. 9].
42
+
43
+ In this case, the 20th day falls on a Saturday (June 21). The answer is therefore due on Monday, June 23. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a)(3) (establishing that when a deadline falls on Saturday, the "period runs until the end of the next day that is not a Saturday").
44
+
45
+ <sup>2</sup>Notably, the plaintiff's attorney never mailed Mr. Epstein a copy of his motion for a Clerk's entry of default.
46
+
47
+ <sup>3</sup>The plaintiff's attorney here previously filed an identical action, captioned Jane Doe No. 1 v. Epstein, Case No. 08-80069-KAM, on behalf of a different plaintiff. That action was voluntarily dismissed by the plaintiff's attorney after a motion to intervene was filed by Jane Doe
48
+
49
+ #### Overview of Rules for Service of Process
50
+
51
+ The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure authorize three distinct methods of service in a diversity action. First, service can be effected in accordance with the procedures "in the state where the district court is located" (here, Florida). See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(e)(1). Second, service can be effected in accordance with the procedures "in the state . .. where service is made" (here, New York). See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(e)(1). Third, service can be effected in accordance with federal procedure. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (e)(2). Cf. David D. Siegel, Practice Commentary on Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Commentary C4-22 (observing that "there is no priority between the [authorized methods of service]") (emphasis added).
52
+
53
+ In addition to that action, the same plaintiff's attorney here has filed four other, identical lawsuits against Jeffrey Epstein on behalf of four plaintiffs that are still pending before this Court: Jane Doe No. 2 v. Epstein, Case No. 9:08-cv-80119-KAM; Jane Doe No. 3 v. Epstein, Case No. 9:08-cv-80232-KAM; Jane Doe No. 4 v. Epstein, Case No. 9:08-cv-80380-KAM; and Jane Doe No. 5 v. Epstein, Case No. 9:08-cv-80381-ICAM. Plaintiffs counsel has sought an entry of default in each case. In the Jane Doe No. 2 litigation, the deputy clerk, identified on the docket as "tp," declined to enter a default on the grounds that there had been "Improper Service." See 9:08-cv-80119-KAM [D.E. 7, 8]. In the Jane Doe No. 3 litigation, the deputy clerk has not yet ruled upon the plaintiff's motion. See Case No. 9:08-cv-80232-KAM [D.E. 5]. In the Jane Doe No. 4 and Jane Doe No. 5 litigation, the deputy clerk, identified on both docket sheets as "ail," entered the default. See Case No. 9:08-cv-80380-KAM [D.E. 7, 8] and Case No. 9:08-cv-80381-ICAM [D.E. 5, 6]. Since then, the plaintiff's attorney has moved for a judgment of default in those two cases (Jane Doe Nos. 4 and 5). See Case No. 9:08-cv-80380-ICAM [D.E. 9] and Case No. 9:08-cv-80381-KAM [D.E. 7].
54
+
55
+ No. 1 (through her mother) indicating that neither Jane Doe No. 1 nor her mother had consented to the attorney's filing the lawsuit on her behalf. See Case No. 08-80069-KAM [D.E. 9].
56
+
57
+ Thus, when a diversity action is brought in the Southern District of Florida, and service is made in New York, service is effective when it complies with either Florida law or New York law, or alternatively, with federal procedure.
58
+
59
+ As discussed below, because New York does not have a residency requirement for the person to whom substitute-service is delivered (and Florida and the federal rules do), service was effective only in accordance with New York procedure. Cf. RCP's Lear, LLC, 2008 WL 305103, at \*4 (resolving parties' dispute concerning the intended method of service, and applicable procedure). Stated differently, service did not comply with either federal procedure or Florida procedure.
60
+
61
+ # New York Procedure—CPI AR 308 (no residency requirement)
62
+
63
+ Under New York law, service of process can be effected by delivering the summons "to a person of suitable age and discretion at the . . . dwelling place or usual place of abode of the [defendant]," and when the summons is "mailed to the [defendant] at his or her last known residence or . . . mail[ed] . . . by first class mail to the [defendant] at his or her actual place of business" in accordance with specific technical instructions. N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 308(2) (McKinney 2008). As an additional requirement, "proof of such service shall be filed with the clerk of the court designated in the summons within twenty days of either such delivery or mailing, whichever is effected later." Id.
64
+
65
+ In accordance with New York procedure, such substituted service "shall be complete ten days after such filing." Id. (emphasis added). Accordingly, New York does not use the date of delivery to the person at the defendant's "abode" as the date service is effected. This was the point of error for the deputy clerk and the plaintiff's attorney.
66
+
67
+ ## Florida Procedure—Fla. Stat. § 48.031 (residency requirement)
68
+
69
+ Under Florida law, service of process can be effected "by leaving the copies [of the summons and complaint] at [the defendant's] usual place of abode with any person residing therein who is 15 years of age or older and informing the person of their contents." Fla. Stat. § 48.031(1)(a) (2007) (emphasis added). Service is deemed effected as of the date of delivery.
70
+
71
+ # Federal Procedure—Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (e)(2)CB) (residency requirement)
72
+
73
+ Service is effective, under federally authorized procedures, when copies of both the summons and the complaint are "le[ft] . . . at the individual's dwelling or usual place of abode with someone of suitable age and discretion who resides there." Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (e)(2)(B). Again, service is deemed effected as of the date of delivery.
74
+
75
+ ## Discussion
76
+
77
+ Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's response to the complaint is not due until June 23. Accordingly, the clerk's entry of default was premature. For the following "good cause," it should be set aside. Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(c) ("The court may set aside an entry of default for good cause.").
78
+
79
+ # A. Service was not made on someone who "resided" at the subject address.
80
+
81
+ Substituted service was attempted on Richard Barnett at a house owned by Mr. Epstein located at 9 East 71st Street, New York, New York. See Affidavit of Service [D.E. 6]. Mr. Barnett has never lived there.4 (Barnett Aff. 1 3.)
82
+
83
+ ### B. Because service was not made on someone who "resided" at the subject address, service was effective only in accordance with New York procedure.
84
+
85
+ Of the three possible methods of service in this case—New York service, Florida service, and federal-rules service—only New York rules allow substituted service on someone who does not "reside" at the service address. Compare Fla. Stat. § 48.031(1)(a) (authorizing substituted service of process only on a person meeting certain criteria who "reside[s]" at the service address), and Fed. R. Civ. P.
86
+
87
+ <sup>4</sup> Indeed, in a motion for an order compelling the Clerk to enter default against Mr. Epstein, filed in connection with the Jane Doe No. 2 litigation, the plaintiff's attorney characterized Mr. Barnett simply as an "Assistant and House Staff Employee," not a resident of the property. Case No. 9:08-cv-80119-KAM [D.E. 9 at 2].
88
+
89
+ 4 (e)(2)(B) (same), with NY CPLR 308(2) (authorizing so-called "leave-and-mail" substituted service, which does not require delivery to a person who actually resides the service address).
90
+
91
+ Because Mr. Barnett was not a resident of 9 East 71st Street, logically, service could have been effected only in accordance with New York procedure.
92
+
93
+ # C. Service was effective as of June 2, not earlier.
94
+
95
+ As noted above, Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 permits service according to the law "in the state . . . where service is made," here, New York. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(e)(1). While New York permits substitute service on a non-resident at the defendant's "abode," such substituted service is not complete until 10 days after the affidavit reciting the method of service is actually filed with the Court. See NY CPLR 308(2).
96
+
97
+ Although the summons was left with Mr. Barnett at Epstein's New York home on May 7, the affidavit of service was not filed with the Court until May 22. Accordingly, under NY CPLR 308(2), service is not deemed complete until 10 days later, which was June 2. Counting 20 days more, according to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1)(A)(i) and 5, Mr. Epstein's response is still not due until June 23. Accordingly, the plaintiff's motion for default was almost three weeks early and the default was entered improperly.
98
+
99
+ ## D. "Actual" notice is irrelevant.
100
+
101
+ In the related Jane Doe No. 2 case, the plaintiff advances the untenable position that the service rules are trumped simply because Epstein had "actual notice" of the complaints. See D.E. 9 at 4, 19 (Jane Doe No. 2 v. Epstein, Case No. 9:08-cv-80119-KAM) ("Defendant Epstein had actual notice of the filing of the Complaint, and the Plaintiff has exercised diligence and good faith in attempting to serve Defendant Epstein with process. Accordingly, entry of default is appropriate."). The Eleventh Circuit is clear, however, that "actual notice of a suit does not dispose of the requirements of service of process." v. Warden, FCC Coleman-USP, 259 Fed. Appx. 181, 182 n.2 (11th Cir. 2007) (citing Mfrs. Hanover Trust Co. v. Ponsoldt, 51 F.3d 938, 940 (11th Cir.1995)).
102
+
103
+ # Conclusion
104
+
105
+ We do not dispute that service was effective. We only dispute the date that it became effective. Since service was ineffective under both Florida law and the federal-rules alternative (because the recipient of the service did not "reside" at the address), the only service law that could apply is New York's. New York's rule for substituted-service does not start the 20-day clock for responding to the coinplaint until 10 days after the process-server's affidavit is filed with the Court.
106
+
107
+ Accordingly, the 20-day clock did not start to tick (Le., service was not deemed to have been effected) until June 2. Counting time as provided by Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a)(3), Epstein has until June 23 to serve a response to the complaint.
108
+
109
+ WHEREFORE, "good cause" having been showing under Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(c), the clerk's default should be set aside.
110
+
111
+ Respectfully submitted,
112
+
113
+ ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER & WEISS, P.A.
114
+
115
+ 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Tel: 561 659 8300 Fax: 561 835 8691
116
+
117
+ By: /s/ Jack A. Goldberger Jack A. Goldberger Ha. Bar No. 262013 jgoldberger@agwpa.com
118
+
119
+ Attorneys for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
120
+
121
+ ### CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL RULE 7
122
+
123
+ Counsel for defendant has conferred in good faith with counsel for the plaintiff, who opposes the relief requested in this motion.
124
+
125
+ /s/ Jack A. Goldberger
126
+
127
+ Jack A. Goldberger
128
+
129
+ ## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
130
+
131
+ I HEREBY CERTIFY that on June 13, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on counsel of record identified below by facsimile and U.S. Mail.
132
+
133
+ Jeffrey M. Herman, Esq. Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Herman & Mermelstein, P.A. 18205 Biscayne Blvd, Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160 Fax: 305 931 0877
134
+
135
+ /s/ Jack A. Goldberger
136
+
137
+ Jack A. Goldberger
marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740363/EFTA02740363.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,815 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740363.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 11,
15
+ "chars": 14117,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 1.34,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 184.82399999999998,
27
+ 88.28999999999999
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 417.3464050292969,
31
+ 88.28999999999999
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 417.3464050292969,
35
+ 120.88092041015625
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 184.82399999999998,
39
+ 120.88092041015625
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "MOTION TO SET ASIDE CLERK'S DEFAULT",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 155.448,
50
+ 353.15999999999997
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 457.65814208984375,
54
+ 353.15999999999997
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 457.65814208984375,
58
+ 370.2509460449219
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 155.448,
62
+ 370.2509460449219
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ },
66
+ {
67
+ "title": "Introduction",
68
+ "heading_level": null,
69
+ "page_id": 0,
70
+ "polygon": [
71
+ [
72
+ 264.996,
73
+ 482.76
74
+ ],
75
+ [
76
+ 347.4720764160156,
77
+ 482.76
78
+ ],
79
+ [
80
+ 347.4720764160156,
81
+ 498.8809509277344
82
+ ],
83
+ [
84
+ 264.996,
85
+ 498.8809509277344
86
+ ]
87
+ ]
88
+ },
89
+ {
90
+ "title": "Facts and Procedural History",
91
+ "heading_level": null,
92
+ "page_id": 2,
93
+ "polygon": [
94
+ [
95
+ 214.2,
96
+ 232.46999999999997
97
+ ],
98
+ [
99
+ 398.19049072265625,
100
+ 232.46999999999997
101
+ ],
102
+ [
103
+ 398.19049072265625,
104
+ 248.9830322265625
105
+ ],
106
+ [
107
+ 214.2,
108
+ 248.9830322265625
109
+ ]
110
+ ]
111
+ },
112
+ {
113
+ "title": "Overview of Rules for Service of Process",
114
+ "heading_level": null,
115
+ "page_id": 3,
116
+ "polygon": [
117
+ [
118
+ 199.512,
119
+ 72.77532958984375
120
+ ],
121
+ [
122
+ 448.69305419921875,
123
+ 72.77532958984375
124
+ ],
125
+ [
126
+ 448.69305419921875,
127
+ 89.00091552734375
128
+ ],
129
+ [
130
+ 199.512,
131
+ 89.00091552734375
132
+ ]
133
+ ]
134
+ },
135
+ {
136
+ "title": "New York Procedure\u2014CPI AR 308 (no residency requirement)",
137
+ "heading_level": null,
138
+ "page_id": 4,
139
+ "polygon": [
140
+ [
141
+ 118.116,
142
+ 392.84999999999997
143
+ ],
144
+ [
145
+ 494.6922607421875,
146
+ 392.84999999999997
147
+ ],
148
+ [
149
+ 494.6922607421875,
150
+ 410.7509460449219
151
+ ],
152
+ [
153
+ 118.116,
154
+ 410.7509460449219
155
+ ]
156
+ ]
157
+ },
158
+ {
159
+ "title": "Florida Procedure\u2014Fla. Stat. \u00a7 48.031 (residency requirement)",
160
+ "heading_level": null,
161
+ "page_id": 5,
162
+ "polygon": [
163
+ [
164
+ 114.44400000000002,
165
+ 232.46999999999997
166
+ ],
167
+ [
168
+ 498.79638671875,
169
+ 232.46999999999997
170
+ ],
171
+ [
172
+ 498.79638671875,
173
+ 249.50091552734375
174
+ ],
175
+ [
176
+ 114.44400000000002,
177
+ 249.50091552734375
178
+ ]
179
+ ]
180
+ },
181
+ {
182
+ "title": "Federal Procedure\u2014Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (e)(2)CB) (residency requirement)",
183
+ "heading_level": null,
184
+ "page_id": 5,
185
+ "polygon": [
186
+ [
187
+ 91.18799999999999,
188
+ 425.25
189
+ ],
190
+ [
191
+ 522.4581909179688,
192
+ 425.25
193
+ ],
194
+ [
195
+ 522.4581909179688,
196
+ 443.7509460449219
197
+ ],
198
+ [
199
+ 91.18799999999999,
200
+ 443.7509460449219
201
+ ]
202
+ ]
203
+ },
204
+ {
205
+ "title": "Discussion",
206
+ "heading_level": null,
207
+ "page_id": 6,
208
+ "polygon": [
209
+ [
210
+ 271.728,
211
+ 104.49
212
+ ],
213
+ [
214
+ 340.8431701660156,
215
+ 104.49
216
+ ],
217
+ [
218
+ 340.8431701660156,
219
+ 121.25091552734375
220
+ ],
221
+ [
222
+ 271.728,
223
+ 121.25091552734375
224
+ ]
225
+ ]
226
+ },
227
+ {
228
+ "title": "A. Service was not made on someone who \"resided\" at the subject address.",
229
+ "heading_level": null,
230
+ "page_id": 6,
231
+ "polygon": [
232
+ [
233
+ 68.544,
234
+ 264.06000000000006
235
+ ],
236
+ [
237
+ 540.0619506835938,
238
+ 264.06000000000006
239
+ ],
240
+ [
241
+ 540.0619506835938,
242
+ 282.1209411621094
243
+ ],
244
+ [
245
+ 68.544,
246
+ 282.1209411621094
247
+ ]
248
+ ]
249
+ },
250
+ {
251
+ "title": "B. Because service was not made on someone who \"resided\" at the subject \naddress, service was effective only in accordance with New York \nprocedure.",
252
+ "heading_level": null,
253
+ "page_id": 6,
254
+ "polygon": [
255
+ [
256
+ 68.544,
257
+ 392.84999999999997
258
+ ],
259
+ [
260
+ 543.843994140625,
261
+ 392.84999999999997
262
+ ],
263
+ [
264
+ 543.843994140625,
265
+ 443.0009460449219
266
+ ],
267
+ [
268
+ 68.544,
269
+ 443.0009460449219
270
+ ]
271
+ ]
272
+ },
273
+ {
274
+ "title": "C. Service was effective as of June 2, not earlier.",
275
+ "heading_level": null,
276
+ "page_id": 7,
277
+ "polygon": [
278
+ [
279
+ 68.544,
280
+ 232.46999999999997
281
+ ],
282
+ [
283
+ 381.76318359375,
284
+ 232.46999999999997
285
+ ],
286
+ [
287
+ 381.76318359375,
288
+ 250.25091552734375
289
+ ],
290
+ [
291
+ 68.544,
292
+ 250.25091552734375
293
+ ]
294
+ ]
295
+ },
296
+ {
297
+ "title": "D. \"Actual\" notice is irrelevant.",
298
+ "heading_level": null,
299
+ "page_id": 8,
300
+ "polygon": [
301
+ [
302
+ 68.544,
303
+ 72.08999999999999
304
+ ],
305
+ [
306
+ 283.8944396972656,
307
+ 72.08999999999999
308
+ ],
309
+ [
310
+ 283.8944396972656,
311
+ 89.00091552734375
312
+ ],
313
+ [
314
+ 68.544,
315
+ 89.00091552734375
316
+ ]
317
+ ]
318
+ },
319
+ {
320
+ "title": "Conclusion",
321
+ "heading_level": null,
322
+ "page_id": 8,
323
+ "polygon": [
324
+ [
325
+ 269.28000000000003,
326
+ 425.25
327
+ ],
328
+ [
329
+ 342.80718994140625,
330
+ 425.25
331
+ ],
332
+ [
333
+ 342.80718994140625,
334
+ 443.0009460449219
335
+ ],
336
+ [
337
+ 269.28000000000003,
338
+ 443.0009460449219
339
+ ]
340
+ ]
341
+ },
342
+ {
343
+ "title": "CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL RULE 7",
344
+ "heading_level": null,
345
+ "page_id": 10,
346
+ "polygon": [
347
+ [
348
+ 118.116,
349
+ 104.49
350
+ ],
351
+ [
352
+ 495.2377624511719,
353
+ 104.49
354
+ ],
355
+ [
356
+ 495.2377624511719,
357
+ 120.88092041015625
358
+ ],
359
+ [
360
+ 118.116,
361
+ 120.88092041015625
362
+ ]
363
+ ]
364
+ },
365
+ {
366
+ "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
367
+ "heading_level": null,
368
+ "page_id": 10,
369
+ "polygon": [
370
+ [
371
+ 209.91600000000003,
372
+ 264.87
373
+ ],
374
+ [
375
+ 402.5826416015625,
376
+ 264.87
377
+ ],
378
+ [
379
+ 402.5826416015625,
380
+ 281.7509460449219
381
+ ],
382
+ [
383
+ 209.91600000000003,
384
+ 281.7509460449219
385
+ ]
386
+ ]
387
+ }
388
+ ],
389
+ "page_stats": [
390
+ {
391
+ "page_id": 0,
392
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
393
+ "block_counts": [
394
+ [
395
+ "Span",
396
+ 42
397
+ ],
398
+ [
399
+ "Line",
400
+ 22
401
+ ],
402
+ [
403
+ "Text",
404
+ 10
405
+ ],
406
+ [
407
+ "SectionHeader",
408
+ 3
409
+ ],
410
+ [
411
+ "PageHeader",
412
+ 1
413
+ ],
414
+ [
415
+ "PageFooter",
416
+ 1
417
+ ]
418
+ ],
419
+ "block_metadata": {
420
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
421
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
422
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
423
+ "previous_text": "",
424
+ "previous_type": "",
425
+ "previous_order": 0
426
+ }
427
+ },
428
+ {
429
+ "page_id": 1,
430
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
431
+ "block_counts": [
432
+ [
433
+ "Span",
434
+ 45
435
+ ],
436
+ [
437
+ "Line",
438
+ 23
439
+ ],
440
+ [
441
+ "Text",
442
+ 3
443
+ ],
444
+ [
445
+ "PageFooter",
446
+ 2
447
+ ],
448
+ [
449
+ "PageHeader",
450
+ 1
451
+ ]
452
+ ],
453
+ "block_metadata": {
454
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
455
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
456
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
457
+ "previous_text": "",
458
+ "previous_type": "",
459
+ "previous_order": 0
460
+ }
461
+ },
462
+ {
463
+ "page_id": 2,
464
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
465
+ "block_counts": [
466
+ [
467
+ "Span",
468
+ 56
469
+ ],
470
+ [
471
+ "Line",
472
+ 26
473
+ ],
474
+ [
475
+ "Text",
476
+ 5
477
+ ],
478
+ [
479
+ "Footnote",
480
+ 3
481
+ ],
482
+ [
483
+ "PageFooter",
484
+ 2
485
+ ],
486
+ [
487
+ "PageHeader",
488
+ 1
489
+ ],
490
+ [
491
+ "SectionHeader",
492
+ 1
493
+ ]
494
+ ],
495
+ "block_metadata": {
496
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
497
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
498
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
499
+ "previous_text": "",
500
+ "previous_type": "",
501
+ "previous_order": 0
502
+ }
503
+ },
504
+ {
505
+ "page_id": 3,
506
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
507
+ "block_counts": [
508
+ [
509
+ "Span",
510
+ 59
511
+ ],
512
+ [
513
+ "Line",
514
+ 30
515
+ ],
516
+ [
517
+ "Text",
518
+ 2
519
+ ],
520
+ [
521
+ "PageFooter",
522
+ 2
523
+ ],
524
+ [
525
+ "PageHeader",
526
+ 1
527
+ ],
528
+ [
529
+ "SectionHeader",
530
+ 1
531
+ ],
532
+ [
533
+ "Footnote",
534
+ 1
535
+ ]
536
+ ],
537
+ "block_metadata": {
538
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
539
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
540
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
541
+ "previous_text": "",
542
+ "previous_type": "",
543
+ "previous_order": 0
544
+ }
545
+ },
546
+ {
547
+ "page_id": 4,
548
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
549
+ "block_counts": [
550
+ [
551
+ "Span",
552
+ 45
553
+ ],
554
+ [
555
+ "Line",
556
+ 23
557
+ ],
558
+ [
559
+ "Text",
560
+ 3
561
+ ],
562
+ [
563
+ "PageFooter",
564
+ 2
565
+ ],
566
+ [
567
+ "PageHeader",
568
+ 1
569
+ ],
570
+ [
571
+ "SectionHeader",
572
+ 1
573
+ ]
574
+ ],
575
+ "block_metadata": {
576
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
577
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
578
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
579
+ "previous_text": "",
580
+ "previous_type": "",
581
+ "previous_order": 0
582
+ }
583
+ },
584
+ {
585
+ "page_id": 5,
586
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
587
+ "block_counts": [
588
+ [
589
+ "Span",
590
+ 41
591
+ ],
592
+ [
593
+ "Line",
594
+ 20
595
+ ],
596
+ [
597
+ "Text",
598
+ 3
599
+ ],
600
+ [
601
+ "SectionHeader",
602
+ 2
603
+ ],
604
+ [
605
+ "PageFooter",
606
+ 2
607
+ ],
608
+ [
609
+ "PageHeader",
610
+ 1
611
+ ]
612
+ ],
613
+ "block_metadata": {
614
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
615
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
616
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
617
+ "previous_text": "",
618
+ "previous_type": "",
619
+ "previous_order": 0
620
+ }
621
+ },
622
+ {
623
+ "page_id": 6,
624
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
625
+ "block_counts": [
626
+ [
627
+ "Span",
628
+ 53
629
+ ],
630
+ [
631
+ "Line",
632
+ 24
633
+ ],
634
+ [
635
+ "SectionHeader",
636
+ 3
637
+ ],
638
+ [
639
+ "Text",
640
+ 3
641
+ ],
642
+ [
643
+ "PageFooter",
644
+ 2
645
+ ],
646
+ [
647
+ "PageHeader",
648
+ 1
649
+ ],
650
+ [
651
+ "Footnote",
652
+ 1
653
+ ]
654
+ ],
655
+ "block_metadata": {
656
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
657
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
658
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
659
+ "previous_text": "",
660
+ "previous_type": "",
661
+ "previous_order": 0
662
+ }
663
+ },
664
+ {
665
+ "page_id": 7,
666
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
667
+ "block_counts": [
668
+ [
669
+ "Span",
670
+ 43
671
+ ],
672
+ [
673
+ "Line",
674
+ 22
675
+ ],
676
+ [
677
+ "Text",
678
+ 4
679
+ ],
680
+ [
681
+ "PageFooter",
682
+ 2
683
+ ],
684
+ [
685
+ "PageHeader",
686
+ 1
687
+ ],
688
+ [
689
+ "SectionHeader",
690
+ 1
691
+ ]
692
+ ],
693
+ "block_metadata": {
694
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
695
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
696
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
697
+ "previous_text": "",
698
+ "previous_type": "",
699
+ "previous_order": 0
700
+ }
701
+ },
702
+ {
703
+ "page_id": 8,
704
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
705
+ "block_counts": [
706
+ [
707
+ "Span",
708
+ 43
709
+ ],
710
+ [
711
+ "Line",
712
+ 21
713
+ ],
714
+ [
715
+ "SectionHeader",
716
+ 2
717
+ ],
718
+ [
719
+ "Text",
720
+ 2
721
+ ],
722
+ [
723
+ "PageFooter",
724
+ 2
725
+ ],
726
+ [
727
+ "PageHeader",
728
+ 1
729
+ ]
730
+ ],
731
+ "block_metadata": {
732
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
733
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
734
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
735
+ "previous_text": "",
736
+ "previous_type": "",
737
+ "previous_order": 0
738
+ }
739
+ },
740
+ {
741
+ "page_id": 9,
742
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
743
+ "block_counts": [
744
+ [
745
+ "Span",
746
+ 39
747
+ ],
748
+ [
749
+ "Line",
750
+ 20
751
+ ],
752
+ [
753
+ "Text",
754
+ 7
755
+ ],
756
+ [
757
+ "PageFooter",
758
+ 2
759
+ ],
760
+ [
761
+ "PageHeader",
762
+ 1
763
+ ]
764
+ ],
765
+ "block_metadata": {
766
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
767
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
768
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
769
+ "previous_text": "",
770
+ "previous_type": "",
771
+ "previous_order": 0
772
+ }
773
+ },
774
+ {
775
+ "page_id": 10,
776
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
777
+ "block_counts": [
778
+ [
779
+ "Span",
780
+ 43
781
+ ],
782
+ [
783
+ "Line",
784
+ 22
785
+ ],
786
+ [
787
+ "Text",
788
+ 7
789
+ ],
790
+ [
791
+ "SectionHeader",
792
+ 2
793
+ ],
794
+ [
795
+ "PageFooter",
796
+ 2
797
+ ],
798
+ [
799
+ "PageHeader",
800
+ 1
801
+ ]
802
+ ],
803
+ "block_metadata": {
804
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
805
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
806
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
807
+ "previous_text": "",
808
+ "previous_type": "",
809
+ "previous_order": 0
810
+ }
811
+ }
812
+ ],
813
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02740363"
814
+ }
815
+ }
marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740374/EFTA02740374.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
2
+
3
+ CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRA-
4
+
5
+ JANE DOE NO. 4,
6
+
7
+ Plaintiff,
8
+
9
+ vs.
10
+
11
+ JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
12
+
13
+ Defendant.
14
+
15
+ /
16
+
17
+ ## DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT (DE #9)
18
+
19
+ In accordance with Local Rule 7.1(C), Defendant Jeffrey Epstein submits the following response in opposition to Plaintiff's Motion (DE #9) for Judgment Upon Default, and respectfully states as follows:
20
+
21
+ - 1. Jeffrey Epstein has filed a motion (DE #11) to set aside the clerk's default (DE #8) that would serve as the basis of a default judgment (DE #9-2).
22
+ - 2. For the reasons detailed in that motion (DE #11 at 3), the clerk's default was entered prematurely because substituted service was effected on June 2, not May 7. Thus, in accordance with Rule 12(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Mr. Epstein has until June 23 to respond to the complaint.
23
+ - 3. Apart from the prematureness of the plaintiff's motion, "[t]he law does not favor defaults, and any doubts as to whether a party is in default should be decided in
24
+
25
+ favor of the defaulting party." E.g., Marschauser v. Travelers Indem. Co., 145 F.R.D. 605, 610 (S.D. Ha. 1992) (Highsmith, J.) (citing 10 Charles A. =, Arthur R. & Mary K. Kane, Federal Practice and Procedure § 2681 at 402-03 (2d ed. 1983)). Cf. id. (noting that "[t]he Court's entry of an Order of Default is within the discretion of the Court").
26
+
27
+ 4. Because the default (DE 8) was premature, any default judgment at this point would also be premature. See Franklin v. Scribner, No. 07cv438 BTM (LSP), 2007 WL 2326085, at \*1 (S.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2007) (denying motion for default judgment where the answer deadline had not yet passed); see also id. (characterizing the motion for default judgment as "deficien[t]").
28
+
29
+ WHEREFORE, based on the foregoing, defendant Jeffrey Epstein opposes the plaintiff's motion for entry of default judgment.
30
+
31
+ Respectfully submitted,
32
+
33
+ ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER & WEISS, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Tel: 561 659 8300 Fax: 561 835 8691
34
+
35
+ By: AI Jack A. Goldberger Jack A. Goldberger Ha. Bar No. 262013 jgoldberger@ agwpa.com
36
+
37
+ Attorneys for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
38
+
39
+ ## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
40
+
41
+ I HEREBY CERTIFY that on June 19, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on counsel of record identified below by facsimile and U.S. Mail.
42
+
43
+ Jeffrey M. Herman, Esq. Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Herman & Mermelstein, P.A. 18205 Biscayne Blvd, Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160 Fax: 305 931 0877
44
+
45
+ > /s/ Jack A. Goldberger Jack A. Goldberger
marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740374/EFTA02740374.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,212 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740374.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 3,
15
+ "chars": 2721,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 0.71,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 197.676,
27
+ 72.08999999999999
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 414.0821533203125,
31
+ 72.08999999999999
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 414.0821533203125,
35
+ 102.24200439453125
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 197.676,
39
+ 102.24200439453125
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION \nTO MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT (DE #9)",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 141.984,
50
+ 326.43
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 470.1269836425781,
54
+ 326.43
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 470.1269836425781,
58
+ 360.6219787597656
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 141.984,
62
+ 360.6219787597656
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ },
66
+ {
67
+ "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
68
+ "heading_level": null,
69
+ "page_id": 2,
70
+ "polygon": [
71
+ [
72
+ 209.91600000000003,
73
+ 72.08999999999999
74
+ ],
75
+ [
76
+ 402.59503173828125,
77
+ 72.08999999999999
78
+ ],
79
+ [
80
+ 402.59503173828125,
81
+ 88.36199951171875
82
+ ],
83
+ [
84
+ 209.91600000000003,
85
+ 88.36199951171875
86
+ ]
87
+ ]
88
+ }
89
+ ],
90
+ "page_stats": [
91
+ {
92
+ "page_id": 0,
93
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
94
+ "block_counts": [
95
+ [
96
+ "Span",
97
+ 46
98
+ ],
99
+ [
100
+ "Line",
101
+ 24
102
+ ],
103
+ [
104
+ "Text",
105
+ 8
106
+ ],
107
+ [
108
+ "ListItem",
109
+ 3
110
+ ],
111
+ [
112
+ "SectionHeader",
113
+ 2
114
+ ],
115
+ [
116
+ "PageHeader",
117
+ 1
118
+ ],
119
+ [
120
+ "ListGroup",
121
+ 1
122
+ ],
123
+ [
124
+ "PageFooter",
125
+ 1
126
+ ]
127
+ ],
128
+ "block_metadata": {
129
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
130
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
131
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
132
+ "previous_text": "",
133
+ "previous_type": "",
134
+ "previous_order": 0
135
+ }
136
+ },
137
+ {
138
+ "page_id": 1,
139
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
140
+ "block_counts": [
141
+ [
142
+ "Span",
143
+ 63
144
+ ],
145
+ [
146
+ "Line",
147
+ 26
148
+ ],
149
+ [
150
+ "Text",
151
+ 7
152
+ ],
153
+ [
154
+ "PageHeader",
155
+ 1
156
+ ],
157
+ [
158
+ "PageFooter",
159
+ 1
160
+ ]
161
+ ],
162
+ "block_metadata": {
163
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
164
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
165
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
166
+ "previous_text": "",
167
+ "previous_type": "",
168
+ "previous_order": 0
169
+ }
170
+ },
171
+ {
172
+ "page_id": 2,
173
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
174
+ "block_counts": [
175
+ [
176
+ "Span",
177
+ 31
178
+ ],
179
+ [
180
+ "Line",
181
+ 16
182
+ ],
183
+ [
184
+ "Text",
185
+ 3
186
+ ],
187
+ [
188
+ "PageHeader",
189
+ 1
190
+ ],
191
+ [
192
+ "SectionHeader",
193
+ 1
194
+ ],
195
+ [
196
+ "PageFooter",
197
+ 1
198
+ ]
199
+ ],
200
+ "block_metadata": {
201
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
202
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
203
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
204
+ "previous_text": "",
205
+ "previous_type": "",
206
+ "previous_order": 0
207
+ }
208
+ }
209
+ ],
210
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02740374"
211
+ }
212
+ }
marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740377/EFTA02740377.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ #### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
2
+
3
+ CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRA-JOHNSON
4
+
5
+ JANE DOE NO. 4,
6
+
7
+ Plaintiff,
8
+
9
+ vs.
10
+
11
+ JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
12
+
13
+ Defendant.
14
+
15
+ ### DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR STAY
16
+
17
+ Defendant Jeffrey Epstein respectfully moves for a mandatory stay of this action under Title 18, United States Code, Section 3509(k). As discussed below, this action is subject to a mandatory stay based on the existence of two pending parallel criminal actions.
18
+
19
+ ### Introduction
20
+
21
+ This civil action is a private counterpart to two ongoing criminal actions, one in Palm Beach state court, the other in Miami federal court. Both cases purport to arise from the same occurrence: the alleged sexual assault of a minor, Jane Doe No. 4. A federal statute directly on point provides that when an alleged sexual assault involving a child victim results in a "criminal proceeding," a commonly
22
+
23
+ derived civil suit "shall be stayed until the end of all phases of the criminal action." 18 U.S.C. § 3509(k) (emphasis added).' A stay of this case is required until there is no longer a pending criminal action derived from the same underlying allegations. See 18 U.S.C. § 3509(k).
24
+
25
+ #### Discussion
26
+
27
+ The parallel state criminal action pending in Palm Beach Circuit Court is still in the discovery phase. State of Florida v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 2006 CF 09454 AXX (Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County). Meanwhile, there is also a parallel federal criminal grand jury action pending in the Southern District of Florida. In re Grand Jury, No. FGJ 07-103(WPB) (S.D. Fla.) Both cases arise out of the same occurrence and allege that the minor plaintiff is a victim.
28
+
29
+ The language of section 3509(k) of title 18, United States Code, is clear: a parallel "civil action shall be stayed until the end of all phases of the criminal
30
+
31
+ If, at any time that a cause of action for recovery of compensation for damage or injury to the person of a child exists, a criminal action is pending which arises out of the same occurrence and in which the child is the victim, the civil action shall be stayed until the end of all phases of the criminal action and any mention of the civil action during the criminal proceeding is prohibited. As used in this subsection, a criminal action is pending until its final adjudication in the trial court.
32
+
33
+ The full text of the mandatory-stay provision reads:
34
+
35
+ <sup>18</sup> U.S.C. § 3509(k).
36
+
37
+ action." 18 U.S.C. § 3509(k) (emphasis added). When it comes to statutory construction, the mandatory nature of the word "shall" is well-settled. See, e.g., Mv. = 531 U.S. 230, 241 (2001) (noting Congress' "use of a mandatory `shall' to impose discretionless obligations") (emphasis added); Lexecon Inc. v. Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach, 523 U.S. 26, 35 (1998) (explaining that "the mandatory `shall' . . . normally creates an obligation impervious to judicial discretion") (emphasis added). Cf. .Miv. .= 530 U.S. 327, 350 (2000) ("Through the PLRA [Prison Litigation Reform Act], Congress clearly intended to make operation of the automatic stay mandatory, precluding courts from exercising their equitable powers to enjoin the stay. And we conclude that this provision does not violate separation of powers principles.") (emphasis added).
38
+
39
+ One district court within the Eleventh Circuit, facing the identical issue with a pending state prosecution, recently construed "the plain language of § 3509(k)" as "requir[ing/ a stay in a case . . . where . . . a parallel criminal action [is] pending." Doe v. Francis, No. 5:03 CV 260 MCR/WCS, 2005 WL 950623, at \*2 (N.D. Fla. Apr. 20, 2005) (Francis II) (emphasis added). Accord Doe v. Francis, No. 5:03 CV 260 MCR/WCS, 2005 WL 517847, at \*1-2 (N.D. Fla. Feb. 10, 2005) (Francis I) (staying federal civil action in favor of "a criminal case currently pending in state court in Bay County, Florida, arising from the same facts and involving the same parties as the Instant action," noting that "the language of 18
40
+
41
+ U.S.C. § 3509(k) is clear that a stay is required in a case such as this where a parallel criminal action is pending which arises from the same occurrence involving minor victims") (emphasis added). There is no contrary opinion from any court.
42
+
43
+ In determining that the federal stay provision is mandatory, the Francis H court expressed that there was apparently no case law supporting, or even "discussing the [avoidance] of a stay [under the command of] § 3509(k)." Francis II, 2005 WL 950623, at \*2. Deferring to the statute as written, the Francis H court rejected the plaintiffs' argument that some of the alleged victims had already reached their majority. See id. The court similarly rejected the plaintiffs' argument that it would be in the victims' best interests to avoid a stay so as to counteract the victims' "ongoing and increasing mental harm due to the `frustrating delay in both the criminal case and [the civil] case.'" Id. The Francis H court, in adhering to the plain language of the statute, also adhered to the "well established priority of criminal proceedings over civil proceedings." Cf. United States v. Hanhardt, 156 F. Supp. 2d 988, 1000 (N.D. Ill. 2001) (citing Fed. R. Crim. P. 50(a)).
44
+
45
+ # Conclusion
46
+
47
+ Because this civil action arises from the same allegations as two pending criminal actions, § 3509(k) mandates a stay of this civil action.
48
+
49
+ WHEREFORE, Defendant Jeffrey Epstein respectfully requests that the Court enter a stay under 18 U.S.C. § 3509(k), coextensive with the state and federal criminal actions.
50
+
51
+ Respectfully submitted,
52
+
53
+ ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER & WEISS, P.A.
54
+
55
+ 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Tel: 561 659 8300 Fax: 561 835 8691
56
+
57
+ By: /s/ Jack A. Goldberger Jack A. Goldberger Fla. Bar No. 262013 j goldberger@agwpa.com
58
+
59
+ Attorneys for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
60
+
61
+ ## CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL RULE 7
62
+
63
+ Counsel for defendant has conferred in good faith with counsel for the plaintiff, who opposes the relief requested in this motion.
64
+
65
+ /s/ Jack A. Goldberger
66
+
67
+ Jack A. Goldberger
68
+
69
+ ## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
70
+
71
+ I HEREBY CERTIFY that on June 20, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on counsel of record identified below by facsimile and U.S. Mail.
72
+
73
+ Jeffrey M. Herman, Esq. Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Herman & Mermelstein, P.A. 18205 Biscayne Blvd, Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160 Fax: 305 931 0877
74
+
75
+ /s/ Jack A. Goldberger
76
+
77
+ Jack A. Goldberger
marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740377/EFTA02740377.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,410 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740377.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 6,
15
+ "chars": 6553,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 0.99,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 187.88000000000002,
27
+ 68.03999999999999
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 418.849365234375,
31
+ 68.03999999999999
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 418.849365234375,
35
+ 102.49591064453125
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 187.88000000000002,
39
+ 102.49591064453125
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR STAY",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 180.56,
50
+ 342.63
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 422.33087158203125,
54
+ 342.63
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 422.33087158203125,
58
+ 360.8759460449219
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 180.56,
62
+ 360.8759460449219
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ },
66
+ {
67
+ "title": "Introduction",
68
+ "heading_level": null,
69
+ "page_id": 0,
70
+ "polygon": [
71
+ [
72
+ 259.25,
73
+ 503.82
74
+ ],
75
+ [
76
+ 342.2220458984375,
77
+ 503.82
78
+ ],
79
+ [
80
+ 342.2220458984375,
81
+ 522.1159362792969
82
+ ],
83
+ [
84
+ 259.25,
85
+ 522.1159362792969
86
+ ]
87
+ ]
88
+ },
89
+ {
90
+ "title": "Discussion",
91
+ "heading_level": null,
92
+ "page_id": 1,
93
+ "polygon": [
94
+ [
95
+ 266.57000000000005,
96
+ 197.64
97
+ ],
98
+ [
99
+ 335.9453125,
100
+ 197.64
101
+ ],
102
+ [
103
+ 335.9453125,
104
+ 214.61590576171875
105
+ ],
106
+ [
107
+ 266.57000000000005,
108
+ 214.61590576171875
109
+ ]
110
+ ]
111
+ },
112
+ {
113
+ "title": "Conclusion",
114
+ "heading_level": null,
115
+ "page_id": 3,
116
+ "polygon": [
117
+ [
118
+ 280.6,
119
+ 616.41
120
+ ],
121
+ [
122
+ 354.02984619140625,
123
+ 616.41
124
+ ],
125
+ [
126
+ 354.02984619140625,
127
+ 635.3659362792969
128
+ ],
129
+ [
130
+ 280.6,
131
+ 635.3659362792969
132
+ ]
133
+ ]
134
+ },
135
+ {
136
+ "title": "CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL RULE 7",
137
+ "heading_level": null,
138
+ "page_id": 5,
139
+ "polygon": [
140
+ [
141
+ 105.53,
142
+ 83.42999999999999
143
+ ],
144
+ [
145
+ 478.472900390625,
146
+ 83.42999999999999
147
+ ],
148
+ [
149
+ 478.472900390625,
150
+ 102.11590576171875
151
+ ],
152
+ [
153
+ 105.53,
154
+ 102.11590576171875
155
+ ]
156
+ ]
157
+ },
158
+ {
159
+ "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
160
+ "heading_level": null,
161
+ "page_id": 5,
162
+ "polygon": [
163
+ [
164
+ 206.79000000000005,
165
+ 260.82
166
+ ],
167
+ [
168
+ 398.00787353515625,
169
+ 260.82
170
+ ],
171
+ [
172
+ 398.00787353515625,
173
+ 279.4959411621094
174
+ ],
175
+ [
176
+ 206.79000000000005,
177
+ 279.4959411621094
178
+ ]
179
+ ]
180
+ }
181
+ ],
182
+ "page_stats": [
183
+ {
184
+ "page_id": 0,
185
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
186
+ "block_counts": [
187
+ [
188
+ "Span",
189
+ 41
190
+ ],
191
+ [
192
+ "Line",
193
+ 21
194
+ ],
195
+ [
196
+ "Text",
197
+ 8
198
+ ],
199
+ [
200
+ "SectionHeader",
201
+ 3
202
+ ],
203
+ [
204
+ "PageHeader",
205
+ 1
206
+ ],
207
+ [
208
+ "PageFooter",
209
+ 1
210
+ ]
211
+ ],
212
+ "block_metadata": {
213
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
214
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
215
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
216
+ "previous_text": "",
217
+ "previous_type": "",
218
+ "previous_order": 0
219
+ }
220
+ },
221
+ {
222
+ "page_id": 1,
223
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
224
+ "block_counts": [
225
+ [
226
+ "Span",
227
+ 51
228
+ ],
229
+ [
230
+ "Line",
231
+ 26
232
+ ],
233
+ [
234
+ "Text",
235
+ 4
236
+ ],
237
+ [
238
+ "Footnote",
239
+ 2
240
+ ],
241
+ [
242
+ "PageFooter",
243
+ 2
244
+ ],
245
+ [
246
+ "PageHeader",
247
+ 1
248
+ ],
249
+ [
250
+ "SectionHeader",
251
+ 1
252
+ ]
253
+ ],
254
+ "block_metadata": {
255
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
256
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
257
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
258
+ "previous_text": "",
259
+ "previous_type": "",
260
+ "previous_order": 0
261
+ }
262
+ },
263
+ {
264
+ "page_id": 2,
265
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
266
+ "block_counts": [
267
+ [
268
+ "Span",
269
+ 45
270
+ ],
271
+ [
272
+ "Line",
273
+ 23
274
+ ],
275
+ [
276
+ "Text",
277
+ 2
278
+ ],
279
+ [
280
+ "PageFooter",
281
+ 2
282
+ ],
283
+ [
284
+ "PageHeader",
285
+ 1
286
+ ]
287
+ ],
288
+ "block_metadata": {
289
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
290
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
291
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
292
+ "previous_text": "",
293
+ "previous_type": "",
294
+ "previous_order": 0
295
+ }
296
+ },
297
+ {
298
+ "page_id": 3,
299
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
300
+ "block_counts": [
301
+ [
302
+ "Span",
303
+ 48
304
+ ],
305
+ [
306
+ "Line",
307
+ 23
308
+ ],
309
+ [
310
+ "Text",
311
+ 3
312
+ ],
313
+ [
314
+ "PageFooter",
315
+ 2
316
+ ],
317
+ [
318
+ "PageHeader",
319
+ 1
320
+ ],
321
+ [
322
+ "SectionHeader",
323
+ 1
324
+ ]
325
+ ],
326
+ "block_metadata": {
327
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
328
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
329
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
330
+ "previous_text": "",
331
+ "previous_type": "",
332
+ "previous_order": 0
333
+ }
334
+ },
335
+ {
336
+ "page_id": 4,
337
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
338
+ "block_counts": [
339
+ [
340
+ "Span",
341
+ 33
342
+ ],
343
+ [
344
+ "Line",
345
+ 17
346
+ ],
347
+ [
348
+ "Text",
349
+ 6
350
+ ],
351
+ [
352
+ "PageFooter",
353
+ 2
354
+ ],
355
+ [
356
+ "PageHeader",
357
+ 1
358
+ ]
359
+ ],
360
+ "block_metadata": {
361
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
362
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
363
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
364
+ "previous_text": "",
365
+ "previous_type": "",
366
+ "previous_order": 0
367
+ }
368
+ },
369
+ {
370
+ "page_id": 5,
371
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
372
+ "block_counts": [
373
+ [
374
+ "Span",
375
+ 41
376
+ ],
377
+ [
378
+ "Line",
379
+ 21
380
+ ],
381
+ [
382
+ "Text",
383
+ 7
384
+ ],
385
+ [
386
+ "SectionHeader",
387
+ 2
388
+ ],
389
+ [
390
+ "PageFooter",
391
+ 2
392
+ ],
393
+ [
394
+ "PageHeader",
395
+ 1
396
+ ]
397
+ ],
398
+ "block_metadata": {
399
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
400
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
401
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
402
+ "previous_text": "",
403
+ "previous_type": "",
404
+ "previous_order": 0
405
+ }
406
+ }
407
+ ],
408
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02740377"
409
+ }
410
+ }
marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740383/EFTA02740383.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ #### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
2
+
3
+ CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRA-JOHNSON
4
+
5
+ JANE DOE NO. 4,
6
+
7
+ Plaintiff,
8
+
9
+ vs.
10
+
11
+ JEFFREY EP=,
12
+
13
+ Defendant.
14
+
15
+ #### DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
16
+
17
+ Defendant Jeffrey Epstein moves, pursuant to S.D. Fla. L.R. 7.1(A), for an enlargement of time to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint until ten days after his motion for a mandatory stay, filed contemporaneously with this motion, is decided, and as grounds for this relief respectfully states as follows:
18
+
19
+ - 1. This civil action is a private counterpart to two ongoing criminal actions, one in Palm Beach state court, the other in the Southern District of Florida.
20
+ - 2. These cases purport to arise from the same occurrence: the alleged sexual assault of a minor, Jane Doe No. 4.
21
+ - 3. On June 20, 2008, Mr. Epstein filed a motion seeking a stay of this action under 18 U.S.C. § 3509. Under that section, when an alleged sexual assault
22
+
23
+ involving a child victim results in a "criminal proceeding," a commonly derived civil suit "shall be stayed until the end of all phases of the criminal action." 18 U.S.C. § 3509(k) (emphasis added).
24
+
25
+ 4. If Mr. Epstein's stay motion is granted, he will not be required to respond to the Complaint or otherwise litigate this action until the two pending criminal matters are resolved.
26
+
27
+ WHEREFORE, Defendant Jeffrey Epstein respectfully requests an enlargement of time to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint until ten days after his motion for a stay is decided.
28
+
29
+ Respectfully submitted,
30
+
31
+ ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER & WEISS, P.A.
32
+
33
+ 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Tel: 561 659 8300 Fax: 561 835 8691
34
+
35
+ By: /s/ Jack A. Goldberger Jack A. Goldberger Fla. Bar No. 262013 j goldberger@agwpa.com
36
+
37
+ Attorneys for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
38
+
39
+ ### CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL RULE 7
40
+
41
+ Counsel for defendant has conferred in good faith with counsel for the plaintiff, who opposes the relief requested in this motion.
42
+
43
+ /s/ Jack A. Goldberger
44
+
45
+ Jack A. Goldberger
46
+
47
+ #### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
48
+
49
+ I HEREBY CERTIFY that on June 20, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on counsel of record identified below by facsimile and U.S. Mail.
50
+
51
+ Jeffrey M. Herman, Esq.
52
+
53
+ Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq.
54
+
55
+ Adam D. Horowitz, Esq.
56
+
57
+ Herman & Mermelstein, P.A.
58
+
59
+ 18205 Biscayne Blvd, Suite 2218
60
+
61
+ Miami, Florida 33160
62
+
63
+ Fax: 305 931 0877
64
+
65
+ /s/ Jack A. Goldberger
66
+
67
+ Jack A. Goldberger
68
+
69
+ ## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
70
+
71
+ CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380—MARRA—J'MME
72
+
73
+ JANE DOE NO. 4,
74
+
75
+ Plaintiff,
76
+
77
+ vs.
78
+
79
+ JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
80
+
81
+ Defendant.
82
+
83
+ # ORDER
84
+
85
+ THIS CAUSE having come to be heard on the Defendant's Motion for An Enlargement of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint, and this Court being fully advised, it is hereby:
86
+
87
+ ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion is hereby granted.
88
+
89
+ DONE AND ORDERED in Miami-Dade County, Florida this day of , 2008.
90
+
91
+ > KENNETH A. MARRA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
92
+
93
+ Copies furnished to: Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. Jeffrey M. Herman, Esq.
marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740383/EFTA02740383.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,319 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740383.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 4,
15
+ "chars": 3212,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 0.98,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 187.88000000000002,
27
+ 71.28
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 417.7270812988281,
31
+ 71.28
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 417.7270812988281,
35
+ 104.37591552734375
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 187.88000000000002,
39
+ 104.37591552734375
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF \nTIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 88.45,
50
+ 345.87
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 516.2247924804688,
54
+ 345.87
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 516.2247924804688,
58
+ 379.2559509277344
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 88.45,
62
+ 379.2559509277344
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ },
66
+ {
67
+ "title": "CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL RULE 7",
68
+ "heading_level": null,
69
+ "page_id": 2,
70
+ "polygon": [
71
+ [
72
+ 116.51000000000002,
73
+ 69.66
74
+ ],
75
+ [
76
+ 488.222900390625,
77
+ 69.66
78
+ ],
79
+ [
80
+ 488.222900390625,
81
+ 87.12591552734375
82
+ ],
83
+ [
84
+ 116.51000000000002,
85
+ 87.12591552734375
86
+ ]
87
+ ]
88
+ },
89
+ {
90
+ "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
91
+ "heading_level": null,
92
+ "page_id": 2,
93
+ "polygon": [
94
+ [
95
+ 205.57000000000002,
96
+ 247.86
97
+ ],
98
+ [
99
+ 395.7915344238281,
100
+ 247.86
101
+ ],
102
+ [
103
+ 395.7915344238281,
104
+ 264.12591552734375
105
+ ],
106
+ [
107
+ 205.57000000000002,
108
+ 264.12591552734375
109
+ ]
110
+ ]
111
+ },
112
+ {
113
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
114
+ "heading_level": null,
115
+ "page_id": 3,
116
+ "polygon": [
117
+ [
118
+ 185.44,
119
+ 68.03999999999999
120
+ ],
121
+ [
122
+ 417.3570861816406,
123
+ 68.03999999999999
124
+ ],
125
+ [
126
+ 417.3570861816406,
127
+ 104.36590576171875
128
+ ],
129
+ [
130
+ 185.44,
131
+ 104.36590576171875
132
+ ]
133
+ ]
134
+ },
135
+ {
136
+ "title": "ORDER",
137
+ "heading_level": null,
138
+ "page_id": 3,
139
+ "polygon": [
140
+ [
141
+ 272.06,
142
+ 343.43999999999994
143
+ ],
144
+ [
145
+ 329.0209655761719,
146
+ 343.43999999999994
147
+ ],
148
+ [
149
+ 329.0209655761719,
150
+ 362.7459411621094
151
+ ],
152
+ [
153
+ 272.06,
154
+ 362.7459411621094
155
+ ]
156
+ ]
157
+ }
158
+ ],
159
+ "page_stats": [
160
+ {
161
+ "page_id": 0,
162
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
163
+ "block_counts": [
164
+ [
165
+ "Span",
166
+ 43
167
+ ],
168
+ [
169
+ "Line",
170
+ 22
171
+ ],
172
+ [
173
+ "Text",
174
+ 7
175
+ ],
176
+ [
177
+ "ListItem",
178
+ 3
179
+ ],
180
+ [
181
+ "SectionHeader",
182
+ 2
183
+ ],
184
+ [
185
+ "PageHeader",
186
+ 1
187
+ ],
188
+ [
189
+ "ListGroup",
190
+ 1
191
+ ],
192
+ [
193
+ "PageFooter",
194
+ 1
195
+ ]
196
+ ],
197
+ "block_metadata": {
198
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
199
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
200
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
201
+ "previous_text": "",
202
+ "previous_type": "",
203
+ "previous_order": 0
204
+ }
205
+ },
206
+ {
207
+ "page_id": 1,
208
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
209
+ "block_counts": [
210
+ [
211
+ "Span",
212
+ 45
213
+ ],
214
+ [
215
+ "Line",
216
+ 23
217
+ ],
218
+ [
219
+ "Text",
220
+ 8
221
+ ],
222
+ [
223
+ "PageFooter",
224
+ 2
225
+ ],
226
+ [
227
+ "PageHeader",
228
+ 1
229
+ ]
230
+ ],
231
+ "block_metadata": {
232
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
233
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
234
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
235
+ "previous_text": "",
236
+ "previous_type": "",
237
+ "previous_order": 0
238
+ }
239
+ },
240
+ {
241
+ "page_id": 2,
242
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
243
+ "block_counts": [
244
+ [
245
+ "Span",
246
+ 43
247
+ ],
248
+ [
249
+ "Line",
250
+ 22
251
+ ],
252
+ [
253
+ "Text",
254
+ 13
255
+ ],
256
+ [
257
+ "SectionHeader",
258
+ 2
259
+ ],
260
+ [
261
+ "PageFooter",
262
+ 2
263
+ ],
264
+ [
265
+ "PageHeader",
266
+ 1
267
+ ]
268
+ ],
269
+ "block_metadata": {
270
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
271
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
272
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
273
+ "previous_text": "",
274
+ "previous_type": "",
275
+ "previous_order": 0
276
+ }
277
+ },
278
+ {
279
+ "page_id": 3,
280
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
281
+ "block_counts": [
282
+ [
283
+ "Span",
284
+ 41
285
+ ],
286
+ [
287
+ "Line",
288
+ 21
289
+ ],
290
+ [
291
+ "Text",
292
+ 11
293
+ ],
294
+ [
295
+ "SectionHeader",
296
+ 2
297
+ ],
298
+ [
299
+ "PageHeader",
300
+ 1
301
+ ],
302
+ [
303
+ "PageFooter",
304
+ 1
305
+ ]
306
+ ],
307
+ "block_metadata": {
308
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
309
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
310
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
311
+ "previous_text": "",
312
+ "previous_type": "",
313
+ "previous_order": 0
314
+ }
315
+ }
316
+ ],
317
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02740383"
318
+ }
319
+ }
marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740387/EFTA02740387.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
2
+
3
+ CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRA
4
+
5
+ JANE DOE NO. 4,
6
+
7
+ Plaintiff, vs.
8
+
9
+ JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
10
+
11
+ Defendant. I
12
+
13
+ ## PLAINTIFF'S REPLY MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
14
+
15
+ Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 4, by and through her undersigned counsel, submits this Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion for Default Judgment, as follows:
16
+
17
+ # Introduction
18
+
19
+ Defendant Jeffrey Epstein claims that service of process on him was ineffective under Florida or Federal law, based solely on a "bare bones" affidavit that raises more questions than it answers. At a minimum, the issue of whether service was effective under Florida or Federal law is at this point one of fact which should be the subject of discovery.
20
+
21
+ #### The Affidavit Attached to the Defendant's Response to the Motion is Insufficient
22
+
23
+ Service of process was effected at Jeffrey Epstein's New York residence on May 7, 2008, at 7:45 a.m. by handing a copy of the Summons and Complaint to a person in Defendant's residence who refused to identify himself. (See D.E. 4, Affidavit of Service). A Clerk's Default was entered against Defendant Jeffrey Epstein in this action on June 2, 2008. Defendant has filed the Affidavit of Richard Barnett, who claims to have received the copies of the Summons and Complaint on May 7, 2008 at Defendant Epstein's residence. In this Affidavit, Mr. Barnett states very little. He asserts
24
+
25
+ that he does not now, nor has he ever, resided at 9 E. 71st Street, New York, New York (Mr. Epstein's residence). He fails to state in this Affidavit, however, where he does live, if not at the residence in question; what he was doing at the subject address when service was made; his relationship with Defendant Epstein, and how often he was at the residence; or why he refused to identify himself to the process server. He also fails to state who instructed him to answer the door on May 7, 2008 and take service anonymously.
26
+
27
+ The Court may grant limited discovery on the issue of service of process. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico v. SS Zoe Colocotroni 61 F.R.D. 653, 656-57 (D.P.R. 1974) ("discovery regarding the legal sufficiency of service of process so as to acquire in personam jurisdiction over the person of a defendant is permitted by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, specifically Rule 26"). See also Blair v. City of Worcester, 522 F.3d 105, Ill (1st Cir. 2008); Monteiro v. San Nicolas, S.A., 254 F.2d 514, 516-17 (2d Cir. 1958) (holding that discovery was appropriate on disputed issues of service of process). The parties do not dispute that if the person who in fact received the copies of the summons and complaint resided at the residence, then service would have been valid under Florida or Federal law on May 7, 2008.1 See National Development Co. v. Triad Holding Corp. 930 F.2d 253 (2d Cir. 1991) (upholding service of process on housekeeper of defendant's New York apartment, under Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(d)(1) [now 4(e)(2)], because the defendant was actually living in the apartment at the time service was effected). Alternatively, if the extraordinary difficulties encountered in serving Mr. Epstein were the result of Mr. Epstein's deliberate avoidance or
28
+
29
+ <sup>&#</sup>x27; Defendant notes that under Rule 4(e) there is no priority between alternative methods of service. This means that Plaintiff has the option of perfecting service under either federal law, the law of the forum state, or the law of the state where service is made: "Either may be turned to with no attempted prior resort to the other." Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 (Commentary C4-22). It does not stand, however, for the proposition that the defendant can accept service under New York law, while ignoring valid service under Florida or Federal law. Accordingly, once valid service was made on Defendant Epstein under Federal or Florida law on May 7, 2008, Defendant was required to answer
30
+
31
+ deception, while knowing of the lawsuit, then it would likewise be appropriate to find good service and a default. See Keevan & Son , Inc. v. Callier Pipe & Tube, Inc., 107 F.R.C. 665, 671-72 (S.D. Fl.a. 1985) (le]ffective service is most likely found when a defendant has engaged in deception to avoid service of process"). Based on what Mr. Barnett's Affidavit does not disclose, the entry of default judgment is appropriate. In the alternative, Plaintiff should be granted discovery to determine whether service was proper under Florida or Federal law. Plaintiff would at a minimum like to take the depositions of Mr. Barnett and Mr. Epstein with regard to the service of process issues that have arisen in this matter.
32
+
33
+ #### Conclusion
34
+
35
+ Based on the foregoing, Plaintiff requests that this Court allow Plaintiff to take discovery on the issue of service of process; conduct an evidentiary hearing on the validity of service under Florida or Federal law; that a default judgment be entered; the amounts set forth in the judgment be assessed by a jury after hearing; and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper.
36
+
37
+ Dated: June 25, 2008. Respectfully submitted,
38
+
39
+ By: s/ Jeffrey M. Herman Jeffrey M. Herman (FL Bar No. 521647) iherman @hermanlaw.com Stuart S. Mennelstein (FL Bar No. 947245) ssm@hermanlaw.com Adam D. Horowitz (FL Bar No. 376980) ahorowitz@ hermanlaw.com HERMAN & MERMELSTEIN, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiffs Jane Doe 18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160 Tel: 305-931-2200
40
+
41
+ ## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
42
+
43
+ I hereby certify that on June 25, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day to all parties on the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those parties who are not authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing.
44
+
45
+ /s/ Jeffrey M. Herman
46
+
47
+ ## SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN CASE NO.: 013-CV-80380-NIARRA/ United States District Court. Southern District of Florida
48
+
49
+ Jack Alan Goldberger jagesq@bellsouth.net
50
+
51
+ /s/ Jeffery M. Herman
marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740387/EFTA02740387.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,376 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740387.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 5,
15
+ "chars": 6145,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 1.05,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 206.856,
27
+ 71.28
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 405.95098876953125,
31
+ 71.28
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 405.95098876953125,
35
+ 100.4830322265625
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 206.856,
39
+ 100.4830322265625
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "PLAINTIFF'S REPLY MEMORANDUM \nIN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 150.552,
50
+ 281.07
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 462.4199523925781,
54
+ 281.07
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 462.4199523925781,
58
+ 310.4830627441406
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 150.552,
62
+ 310.4830627441406
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ },
66
+ {
67
+ "title": "Introduction",
68
+ "heading_level": null,
69
+ "page_id": 0,
70
+ "polygon": [
71
+ [
72
+ 271.116,
73
+ 379.08000000000004
74
+ ],
75
+ [
76
+ 341.24761962890625,
77
+ 379.08000000000004
78
+ ],
79
+ [
80
+ 341.24761962890625,
81
+ 394.10302734375
82
+ ],
83
+ [
84
+ 271.116,
85
+ 394.10302734375
86
+ ]
87
+ ]
88
+ },
89
+ {
90
+ "title": "The Affidavit Attached to the Defendant's \nResponse to the Motion is Insufficient",
91
+ "heading_level": null,
92
+ "page_id": 0,
93
+ "polygon": [
94
+ [
95
+ 195.84,
96
+ 520.02
97
+ ],
98
+ [
99
+ 417.4555358886719,
100
+ 520.02
101
+ ],
102
+ [
103
+ 417.4555358886719,
104
+ 548.2330322265625
105
+ ],
106
+ [
107
+ 195.84,
108
+ 548.2330322265625
109
+ ]
110
+ ]
111
+ },
112
+ {
113
+ "title": "Conclusion",
114
+ "heading_level": null,
115
+ "page_id": 2,
116
+ "polygon": [
117
+ [
118
+ 275.4,
119
+ 295.65
120
+ ],
121
+ [
122
+ 338.2673645019531,
123
+ 295.65
124
+ ],
125
+ [
126
+ 338.2673645019531,
127
+ 309.80352783203125
128
+ ],
129
+ [
130
+ 275.4,
131
+ 309.80352783203125
132
+ ]
133
+ ]
134
+ },
135
+ {
136
+ "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
137
+ "heading_level": null,
138
+ "page_id": 3,
139
+ "polygon": [
140
+ [
141
+ 227.052,
142
+ 71.28
143
+ ],
144
+ [
145
+ 385.02947998046875,
146
+ 71.28
147
+ ],
148
+ [
149
+ 385.02947998046875,
150
+ 85.863037109375
151
+ ],
152
+ [
153
+ 227.052,
154
+ 85.863037109375
155
+ ]
156
+ ]
157
+ },
158
+ {
159
+ "title": "SERVICE LIST \nDOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN \nCASE NO.: 013-CV-80380-NIARRA/ \nUnited States District Court. Southern District of Florida",
160
+ "heading_level": null,
161
+ "page_id": 4,
162
+ "polygon": [
163
+ [
164
+ 157.28400000000002,
165
+ 70.47
166
+ ],
167
+ [
168
+ 455.1561279296875,
169
+ 70.47
170
+ ],
171
+ [
172
+ 455.1561279296875,
173
+ 128.9830322265625
174
+ ],
175
+ [
176
+ 157.28400000000002,
177
+ 128.9830322265625
178
+ ]
179
+ ]
180
+ }
181
+ ],
182
+ "page_stats": [
183
+ {
184
+ "page_id": 0,
185
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
186
+ "block_counts": [
187
+ [
188
+ "Span",
189
+ 60
190
+ ],
191
+ [
192
+ "Line",
193
+ 30
194
+ ],
195
+ [
196
+ "Text",
197
+ 10
198
+ ],
199
+ [
200
+ "SectionHeader",
201
+ 4
202
+ ],
203
+ [
204
+ "PageFooter",
205
+ 2
206
+ ],
207
+ [
208
+ "PageHeader",
209
+ 1
210
+ ]
211
+ ],
212
+ "block_metadata": {
213
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
214
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
215
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
216
+ "previous_text": "",
217
+ "previous_type": "",
218
+ "previous_order": 0
219
+ }
220
+ },
221
+ {
222
+ "page_id": 1,
223
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
224
+ "block_counts": [
225
+ [
226
+ "Span",
227
+ 68
228
+ ],
229
+ [
230
+ "Line",
231
+ 30
232
+ ],
233
+ [
234
+ "PageFooter",
235
+ 4
236
+ ],
237
+ [
238
+ "Text",
239
+ 2
240
+ ],
241
+ [
242
+ "PageHeader",
243
+ 1
244
+ ],
245
+ [
246
+ "Footnote",
247
+ 1
248
+ ]
249
+ ],
250
+ "block_metadata": {
251
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
252
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
253
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
254
+ "previous_text": "",
255
+ "previous_type": "",
256
+ "previous_order": 0
257
+ }
258
+ },
259
+ {
260
+ "page_id": 2,
261
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
262
+ "block_counts": [
263
+ [
264
+ "Span",
265
+ 69
266
+ ],
267
+ [
268
+ "Line",
269
+ 32
270
+ ],
271
+ [
272
+ "Text",
273
+ 8
274
+ ],
275
+ [
276
+ "PageFooter",
277
+ 2
278
+ ],
279
+ [
280
+ "PageHeader",
281
+ 1
282
+ ],
283
+ [
284
+ "SectionHeader",
285
+ 1
286
+ ]
287
+ ],
288
+ "block_metadata": {
289
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
290
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
291
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
292
+ "previous_text": "",
293
+ "previous_type": "",
294
+ "previous_order": 0
295
+ }
296
+ },
297
+ {
298
+ "page_id": 3,
299
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
300
+ "block_counts": [
301
+ [
302
+ "Span",
303
+ 21
304
+ ],
305
+ [
306
+ "Line",
307
+ 11
308
+ ],
309
+ [
310
+ "PageFooter",
311
+ 4
312
+ ],
313
+ [
314
+ "Text",
315
+ 2
316
+ ],
317
+ [
318
+ "PageHeader",
319
+ 1
320
+ ],
321
+ [
322
+ "SectionHeader",
323
+ 1
324
+ ]
325
+ ],
326
+ "block_metadata": {
327
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
328
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
329
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
330
+ "previous_text": "",
331
+ "previous_type": "",
332
+ "previous_order": 0
333
+ }
334
+ },
335
+ {
336
+ "page_id": 4,
337
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
338
+ "block_counts": [
339
+ [
340
+ "Span",
341
+ 23
342
+ ],
343
+ [
344
+ "Line",
345
+ 11
346
+ ],
347
+ [
348
+ "PageFooter",
349
+ 4
350
+ ],
351
+ [
352
+ "Text",
353
+ 2
354
+ ],
355
+ [
356
+ "PageHeader",
357
+ 1
358
+ ],
359
+ [
360
+ "SectionHeader",
361
+ 1
362
+ ]
363
+ ],
364
+ "block_metadata": {
365
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
366
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
367
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
368
+ "previous_text": "",
369
+ "previous_type": "",
370
+ "previous_order": 0
371
+ }
372
+ }
373
+ ],
374
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02740387"
375
+ }
376
+ }
marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740392/EFTA02740392.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
2
+
3
+ CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRA/JOHNSON
4
+
5
+ JANE DOE NO. 4,
6
+
7
+ Plaintiff, vs.
8
+
9
+ JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
10
+
11
+ Defendant.
12
+
13
+ # PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO MOTION TO SET ASIDE CLERK DEFAULT
14
+
15
+ Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 4, by and through her undersigned counsel, submits this Plaintiff's Response to Motion to Set Aside Clerk Default, as follows:
16
+
17
+ #### Introduction
18
+
19
+ Defendant Jeffrey Epstein claims that service of process on him was ineffective under Florida or Federal law, based solely on a "bare bones" affidavit that raises more questions than it answers. On this basis, Defendant seeks to set aside a clerk's default. At a minimum, the issue of whether service was effective under Florida or Federal law is at this point one of fact which should be the subject of discovery. Accordingly, Defendant's Motion should be denied, or alternatively, stayed until such time as discovery on these matters is concluded.
20
+
21
+ #### The Affidavit Attached to the Defendant's Response to the Motion is Insufficient
22
+
23
+ Service of process was effected at Jeffrey Epstein's New York residence on May 7, 2008, at 7:45 a.m. by handing a copy of the Summons and Complaint to a person in Defendant's residence who refused to identify himself. (See D.E. 4, Affidavit of Service). Defendant now attaches to his Motion as Exhibit "A" the Affidavit of Richard Barnett, who claims to have received the copies of
24
+
25
+ the Summons and Complaint on May 7, 2008 at Defendant Epstein's residence. In this Affidavit, Mr. Barnett states very little. He asserts that he does not now, nor has he ever, resided at 9 E. 71st Street, New York, New York (Mr. Epstein's residence). He fails to state in this Affidavit, however, where he does live, if not at the residence in question; what he was doing at the subject address when service was made; his relationship with Defendant Epstein, and how often he was at the residence; or why he refused to identify himself to the process server. He also fails to state who instructed him to answer the door on May 7, 2008 and take service anonymously.
26
+
27
+ The Court may grant limited discovery on the issue of service of process. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico v. SS Zoe Colocotroni 61 F.R.D. 653, 656-57 (D.P.R. 1974) ("discovery regarding the legal sufficiency of service of process so as to acquire in persona: jurisdiction over the person of a defendant is permitted by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, specifically Rule 26"). See also Blair v. City of Worcester, 522 F.3d 105, Ill (1st Cir. 2008); Monteiro v. San Nicolas. S.A., 254 F.2d 514, 516-17 (2d Cir. 1958) (holding that discovery was appropriate on disputed issues of service of process). The parties do not dispute that if the person who in fact received the copies of the summons and complaint resided at the residence, then service would have been valid under Florida or Federal law on May 7, 2008.1 ate National Development Co. v. Triad Holding Corp., 930 F.2d 253 (2d Cir. 1991) (upholding service of process on housekeeper of defendant's New York apartment, under Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(d)(1) [now 4(e)(2)], because the defendant was actually living in
28
+
29
+ <sup>&#</sup>x27; Defendant notes that under Rule 4(e) there is no priority between alternative methods of service. This means that Plaintiff has the option of perfecting service under either federal law, the law of the forum state, or the law of the state where service is made: "Either may be turned to with no attempted prior resort to the other." Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 (Commentary C4-22). It does not stand, however, for the proposition that the defendant can accept service under New York law, while ignoring valid service under Florida or Federal law. Accordingly, once valid service was made on Defendant Epstein under Federal or Florida law on May 7, 2008, Defendant was required to answer to otherwise respond to the Complaint by May 27, 2008 to avoid default, which he failed to do.
30
+
31
+ the apartment at the time service was effected). Alternatively, if the extraordinary difficulties encountered in serving Mr. Epstein were the result of Mr. Epstein's deliberate avoidance or deception, while knowing of the lawsuit, then it would likewise be appropriate to find good service and a default. See Keevan & Son Inc. v. Callier Pipe & Tube. Inc., 107 F.R.C. 665, 671-72 (S.D. Fl.a. 1985) ("Ie)ffective service is most likely found when a defendant has engaged in deception to avoid service of process"). Based on what Mr. Barnett's Affidavit does not disclose, Plaintiff should be granted discovery to determine whether service was proper under Florida or Federal law. Plaintiff would at a minimum like to take the depositions of Mr. Barnett and Mr. Epstein with regard to the service of process issues that have arisen in this matter.
32
+
33
+ # Conclusion
34
+
35
+ Based on the foregoing, Plaintiff requests that this Court deny Defendant's Motion to Set Aside Clerk Default, or alternatively, withhold ruling on the Motion until discovery on the issue of service of process is completed; and such other and further relief as this Court deems proper.
36
+
37
+ Dated: June 25, 2008. Respectfully submitted,
38
+
39
+ By: s/ Jeffrey M. Herman Jeffrey M. Herman (FL Bar No. 521647) jherman@hermanlaw.com Stuart S. Mermelstein (FL Bar No. 947245) ssm@hermanlaw.com Adam D. Horowitz (FL Bar No. 376980) ahorowitz@hermanlaw.com HERMAN & MERMELSTEIN, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiffs Jane Doe 18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160 Tel: 305-931-2200
40
+
41
+ ### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
42
+
43
+ I hereby certify that on June 25, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day
44
+
45
+ to all parties on the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those parties who are not authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing.
46
+
47
+ /s/ Jeffrey M. Herman
48
+
49
+ ## SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRA/ffi United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
50
+
51
+ Jack Alan Goldberger jagesq@bellsouth.net
52
+
53
+ Is/ Jeffery M. Herman
marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740392/EFTA02740392.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,372 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740392.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 5,
15
+ "chars": 6187,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 1.05,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 206.24400000000003,
27
+ 85.85999999999999
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 405.95098876953125,
31
+ 85.85999999999999
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 405.95098876953125,
35
+ 115.4830322265625
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 206.24400000000003,
39
+ 115.4830322265625
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO MOTION TO SET ASIDE CLERK DEFAULT",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 99.756,
50
+ 295.65
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 512.9905395507812,
54
+ 295.65
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 512.9905395507812,
58
+ 310.863037109375
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 99.756,
62
+ 310.863037109375
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ },
66
+ {
67
+ "title": "Introduction",
68
+ "heading_level": null,
69
+ "page_id": 0,
70
+ "polygon": [
71
+ [
72
+ 271.116,
73
+ 380.55889892578125
74
+ ],
75
+ [
76
+ 342.2470703125,
77
+ 380.55889892578125
78
+ ],
79
+ [
80
+ 342.2470703125,
81
+ 394.56353759765625
82
+ ],
83
+ [
84
+ 271.116,
85
+ 394.56353759765625
86
+ ]
87
+ ]
88
+ },
89
+ {
90
+ "title": "The Affidavit Attached to the Defendant's \nResponse to the Motion is Insufficient",
91
+ "heading_level": null,
92
+ "page_id": 0,
93
+ "polygon": [
94
+ [
95
+ 195.84,
96
+ 576.7199999999999
97
+ ],
98
+ [
99
+ 417.4555358886719,
100
+ 576.7199999999999
101
+ ],
102
+ [
103
+ 417.4555358886719,
104
+ 604.8630218505859
105
+ ],
106
+ [
107
+ 195.84,
108
+ 604.8630218505859
109
+ ]
110
+ ]
111
+ },
112
+ {
113
+ "title": "Conclusion",
114
+ "heading_level": null,
115
+ "page_id": 2,
116
+ "polygon": [
117
+ [
118
+ 274.788,
119
+ 337.77
120
+ ],
121
+ [
122
+ 337.7822265625,
123
+ 337.77
124
+ ],
125
+ [
126
+ 337.7822265625,
127
+ 352.863037109375
128
+ ],
129
+ [
130
+ 274.788,
131
+ 352.863037109375
132
+ ]
133
+ ]
134
+ },
135
+ {
136
+ "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
137
+ "heading_level": null,
138
+ "page_id": 2,
139
+ "polygon": [
140
+ [
141
+ 227.052,
142
+ 645.5699999999999
143
+ ],
144
+ [
145
+ 385.0019836425781,
146
+ 645.5699999999999
147
+ ],
148
+ [
149
+ 385.0019836425781,
150
+ 659.9830169677734
151
+ ],
152
+ [
153
+ 227.052,
154
+ 659.9830169677734
155
+ ]
156
+ ]
157
+ },
158
+ {
159
+ "title": "SERVICE LIST \nDOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN \nCASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRA/ffi \nUnited States District Court, Southern District of Florida",
160
+ "heading_level": null,
161
+ "page_id": 4,
162
+ "polygon": [
163
+ [
164
+ 157.28400000000002,
165
+ 84.24
166
+ ],
167
+ [
168
+ 455.6502685546875,
169
+ 84.24
170
+ ],
171
+ [
172
+ 455.6502685546875,
173
+ 143.9830322265625
174
+ ],
175
+ [
176
+ 157.28400000000002,
177
+ 143.9830322265625
178
+ ]
179
+ ]
180
+ }
181
+ ],
182
+ "page_stats": [
183
+ {
184
+ "page_id": 0,
185
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
186
+ "block_counts": [
187
+ [
188
+ "Span",
189
+ 55
190
+ ],
191
+ [
192
+ "Line",
193
+ 28
194
+ ],
195
+ [
196
+ "Text",
197
+ 10
198
+ ],
199
+ [
200
+ "SectionHeader",
201
+ 4
202
+ ],
203
+ [
204
+ "PageFooter",
205
+ 2
206
+ ],
207
+ [
208
+ "PageHeader",
209
+ 1
210
+ ]
211
+ ],
212
+ "block_metadata": {
213
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
214
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
215
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
216
+ "previous_text": "",
217
+ "previous_type": "",
218
+ "previous_order": 0
219
+ }
220
+ },
221
+ {
222
+ "page_id": 1,
223
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
224
+ "block_counts": [
225
+ [
226
+ "Span",
227
+ 68
228
+ ],
229
+ [
230
+ "Line",
231
+ 30
232
+ ],
233
+ [
234
+ "PageFooter",
235
+ 4
236
+ ],
237
+ [
238
+ "Text",
239
+ 2
240
+ ],
241
+ [
242
+ "PageHeader",
243
+ 1
244
+ ],
245
+ [
246
+ "Footnote",
247
+ 1
248
+ ]
249
+ ],
250
+ "block_metadata": {
251
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
252
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
253
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
254
+ "previous_text": "",
255
+ "previous_type": "",
256
+ "previous_order": 0
257
+ }
258
+ },
259
+ {
260
+ "page_id": 2,
261
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
262
+ "block_counts": [
263
+ [
264
+ "Span",
265
+ 73
266
+ ],
267
+ [
268
+ "Line",
269
+ 33
270
+ ],
271
+ [
272
+ "Text",
273
+ 8
274
+ ],
275
+ [
276
+ "SectionHeader",
277
+ 2
278
+ ],
279
+ [
280
+ "PageFooter",
281
+ 2
282
+ ],
283
+ [
284
+ "PageHeader",
285
+ 1
286
+ ]
287
+ ],
288
+ "block_metadata": {
289
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
290
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
291
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
292
+ "previous_text": "",
293
+ "previous_type": "",
294
+ "previous_order": 0
295
+ }
296
+ },
297
+ {
298
+ "page_id": 3,
299
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
300
+ "block_counts": [
301
+ [
302
+ "Span",
303
+ 16
304
+ ],
305
+ [
306
+ "Line",
307
+ 8
308
+ ],
309
+ [
310
+ "PageFooter",
311
+ 4
312
+ ],
313
+ [
314
+ "Text",
315
+ 2
316
+ ],
317
+ [
318
+ "PageHeader",
319
+ 1
320
+ ]
321
+ ],
322
+ "block_metadata": {
323
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
324
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
325
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
326
+ "previous_text": "",
327
+ "previous_type": "",
328
+ "previous_order": 0
329
+ }
330
+ },
331
+ {
332
+ "page_id": 4,
333
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
334
+ "block_counts": [
335
+ [
336
+ "Span",
337
+ 23
338
+ ],
339
+ [
340
+ "Line",
341
+ 11
342
+ ],
343
+ [
344
+ "Text",
345
+ 3
346
+ ],
347
+ [
348
+ "PageFooter",
349
+ 3
350
+ ],
351
+ [
352
+ "PageHeader",
353
+ 1
354
+ ],
355
+ [
356
+ "SectionHeader",
357
+ 1
358
+ ]
359
+ ],
360
+ "block_metadata": {
361
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
362
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
363
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
364
+ "previous_text": "",
365
+ "previous_type": "",
366
+ "previous_order": 0
367
+ }
368
+ }
369
+ ],
370
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02740392"
371
+ }
372
+ }
marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740397/EFTA02740397.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,184 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ## EXHIBIT A
2
+
3
+ DIV : NO
4
+ CASE NO : 5020000000000000 ST OF FL VS. JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN 241
5
+ Charges : FILED OFFER TO COMMIT PROSTITUTION
6
+
7
+ AGREEST & COMMENTARY RECORD DOCTIC COPIES OF 3,000 DO
8
+
9
+ Date 3/20/08 6/30/08 Judge PC III Ctr. Rep. C. DAFMIS
10
+ ASA L. Beloil AMWork DC PBO Int [redacted]
11
+ Deft---Pres / Not Pres. W / W/O Def. Co. G. O. D. Berger Esq / PD---Pres / Not Pres.
12
+ Before the Court for: Statuschool
13
+ Granted Denied With / Without Prejudice Withdrawn Court Reserves Ruling Written Order to Follow
14
+ Warrant Ordered Recalled Bond Set at \$ \_\_\_\_\_ See Below Also Covers Sp Cond
15
+ Bond Forf OR: Disch/Revoked/Reinstated Bond: Disch/Revoked SOR: Disch/Revoked/Reinstated
16
+ Bond Forf Vacated Previous Bond Reinstated, if Bondsman agrees State failed to file charges Released O.R. / S.O.R.
17
+ Deft \_\_\_ Indigent PD Appt Hrg only PD Pres \_\_\_\_\_ Court Appts \_\_\_\_\_
18
+ Evaluation for: Drug Farm DOC Non-Secure Bed by \_\_\_\_\_
19
+ Pre-Plea PSI ordered by/within \_\_\_\_\_ days w/input from DJJ / Staffing
20
+ Referred to: PTI / SAAP / PADD Case placed on the absentee docket
21
+ DEFT ENTERED A PLEA OF: NOT GUILTY GUILTY NO CONTEST BEST INTEREST TO THE COURT
22
+ As Charged-Cts O. N. L. Lesser Cts \_\_\_\_\_ Lesser Charge \_\_\_\_\_
23
+ Sw & Test Adv of Rts Waived PSI Lesser Cts \_\_\_\_\_ Lesser Charge \_\_\_\_\_
24
+ ADJ GUILTY as Charged as to Cts O. N. L. Lesser Cts \_\_\_\_\_
25
+ FOUND GUILTY as Charged as to Cts \_\_\_\_\_ Lesser Cts \_\_\_\_\_
26
+ ADJ W/HELD as to Cts \_\_\_\_\_ SENT W/HELD as to Cts \_\_\_\_\_
27
+ FOUND AND ADJUDICATED DELINQUENT as to Cts \_\_\_\_\_ Dismiss Nolle Prosse Cts \_\_\_\_\_ Dispo Order to follow / Filed
28
+ FOUND & ADJ NOT GUILTY as to Cts \_\_\_\_\_ Dismiss Nolle Prosse Cts \_\_\_\_\_
29
+ Prob / Comm Control: Revoked Reinstated Modified Term. Successfully / Unsuccessfully
30
+ Stip/Found: (violent) Habitual Off. 775.084 Stip/Found: Sexual Offender / Sexual Predator Stip/Found: P.R.R.
31
+ SENTENCE: PBCJ 12 MOS Cts: \_\_\_\_\_ / DOC: \_\_\_\_\_ Cts: \_\_\_\_\_
32
+ PBCJ: \_\_\_\_\_ Cts: \_\_\_\_\_ / DOC: \_\_\_\_\_ Cts: \_\_\_\_\_
33
+ W/Credit for \_\_\_\_\_ Days / Mos. / Yrs. Deft Remanded Deft to remain on same rel. status pending sent.
34
+ Conc / Consec / Co-Term w/cases / cts: \_\_\_\_\_
35
+ Execution of Sentence Stayed Sentence Suspended Time served as to Cts \_\_\_\_\_
36
+ Youthful Off Habitual Off Min / Mand: \_\_\_\_\_ as to Cts \_\_\_\_\_
37
+ ABOVE SENTENCE TO BE FOLLOWED By: Probation Drug / Sex Off Prob Comm. Control I II - See Pg. 2
38
+ DRIVERS LICENSE TO BE SUSPENDED / REVOKED FOR \_\_\_\_\_ YEARS AS A RESULT OF THIS PLEA.
39
+
40
+ DNA Swab
41
+
42
+ \_\_\_\_\_ Set / Remains Set / Reset \_\_\_\_\_ Div \_\_\_\_\_ Rm \_\_\_\_\_ at \_\_\_\_\_ AM/PM
43
+ \_\_\_\_\_ Set / Remains Set / Reset \_\_\_\_\_ Div \_\_\_\_\_ Rm \_\_\_\_\_ at \_\_\_\_\_ AM/PM
44
+ Deft sign \_\_\_\_\_
45
+ Def Co \_\_\_\_\_ ASA \_\_\_\_\_ Bondsman \_\_\_\_\_
46
+ Prob Jail DJJ GAL Notified by mail by: \_\_\_\_\_ on \_\_\_\_\_ / \_\_\_\_\_ / \_\_\_\_\_
47
+ County Courthouse 205 N. Dixie, West Palm Beach Courtroom, Criminal Justice Bldg. Courtroom, Criminal Justice Complex
48
+ 2854 State Road 80, Belle Glade 3228 Gun Club Rd., West Palm Beach
49
+
50
+ IF YOU ARE A PERSON WITH A DISABILITY WHO NEEDS ANY ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS PROCEEDING, YOU ARE ENTITLED, AT NO COST TO YOU, TO THE PROVISION OF CERTAIN ASSISTANCE. PLEASE CONTACT MARY JAFFE, ADA COORDINATOR IN THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE COURT, PALM BEACH COUNTY COURTHOUSE, 205 N. DIXIE HWY, RM 52500, WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401; TELEPHONE (561) 355-0380, WITHIN 2 WORKING DAYS OF YOUR RECEIPT OF THIS NOTICE. IF YOU ARE HEARING OR VOICE IMPAIRED, CALL 1-800-955-8771.
51
+
52
+ Case No.: 2006CF009361AXX W ST of FL vs. JEFFREY KPSTEIN
53
+ Charges: PROCURE PERSON UNDER AGE OF 18 FOR PROSTITUTION
54
+
55
+ (ARIZES FROM 2006CF009454EXX)
56
+
57
+ Arrest# Bond# Type \$ A/C
58
+
59
+ Date Date Judge Crt. Rep. ASA DC Int Def. Co. Esq PD Pres / Not Pres.
60
+
61
+ Before the Court for: St. Hug Mark
62
+
63
+ Granted Denied With / Without Prejudice Withdrawn Court Reserves Ruling Written Order to Follow
64
+
65
+ Warrant Ordered Recalled Bond Set at \$ See Below Also Covers Sp Cond
66
+ Bond Forf OR: Disch / Revoked / Reinstated Bond: Disch / Revoked SOR: Disch / Revoked / Reinstated
67
+ Bond Forf Vacated Previous Bond Reinstated, if Bondsman agrees State failed to file charges Released O.R. / S.O.R.
68
+
69
+ Deft Indigent PD Appt Hrg only PD Pres Court Appts
70
+
71
+ Evaluation for: Drug Farm DOC Non-Secure Bed by Pre-Plea PSI ordered by/within days w/input from DJJ / Staffing
72
+
73
+ Referred to: PTI / SAAP / PADD Case placed on the absentee docket
74
+
75
+ DEFT ENTERED A PLEA OF: NOT GUILTY GUILTY NO CONTEST BEST INTEREST TO THE COURT
76
+ As Charged-Cts Lesser Cts Lesser Charge
77
+ Sw & Test Adv of Rts Waived PSI Lesser Cts Lesser Charge
78
+
79
+ ADJ GUILTY as Charged as to Cts Lesser Cts
80
+
81
+ FOUND GUILTY as Charged as to Cts Lesser Cts
82
+
83
+ ADJ W/HELD as to Cts SENT W/HELD as to Cts
84
+
85
+ FOUND AND ADJUDICATED DELINQUENT as to Cts Dismiss Nolle Prosse Cts
86
+
87
+ Prob / Comm Control: Revoked Reinstated Modified. Term: Successfully / Unsuccessfully
88
+ Deft. to pay fine or complete hrs. Community Service or Serve days PBCJ.
89
+
90
+ Stip/Found: (violent) Habitual Off. 775.084 Stip/Found: Sexual Offender / Sexual Predator Stip/Found: P.R.R.
91
+ SENTENCE: PBCJ Cts: / DOC: Cts:
92
+ PBCJ: Cts: / DOC: Cts:
93
+
94
+ W/Credit for Days / Mos. / Yrs. Deft to remain on same rel. status pending sent.
95
+ Conc / Consec Co-Term w/cases / cts: 400 / 000 / 000 / 000
96
+
97
+ Execution of Sentence Stayed Sentence Suspended Time served as to Cts
98
+
99
+ Youthful Off Habitual Off Min / Mand: as to Cts
100
+ ABOVE SENTENCE TO BE FOLLOWED By: Probation Drug Off Prob Comm. Control I II - See Page 2
101
+
102
+ DUT SUMB
103
+
104
+ Set / Remains Set / Reset Div Rm at AM/PM
105
+
106
+ Set / Remains Set / Reset Div Rm at AM/PM
107
+
108
+ Deft sign ASA Bondsman
109
+
110
+ Def Co ASA Bondsman
111
+
112
+ Prob Jail DJJ. GAL Notified by mail by: on / / /
113
+ County Courthouse Courtroom, Criminal Justice Bldg. Courtroom, Criminal Justice Complex
114
+ 205 N. Dixie, West Palm Beach 38844 State Road 80, Belle Glade 3228 Gun Club Rd., West Palm Beach
115
+
116
+ IF YOU ARE A PERSON WITH A DISABILITY WHO NEEDS ANY ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS PROCEEDING, YOU ARE ENTITLED, AT NO COST TO YOU, TO THE PROVISION OF CERTAIN ASSISTANCE. PLEASE CONTACT ROBIN SHEPPETT, ADA COORDINATOR IN THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE COURT, PALM BEACH COUNTY COURTHOUSE, 205 N. DIXIE HWY, RM 5.2500, WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401; TELEPHONE (561) 355-4386, WITHIN 2 WORKING DAYS OF YOUR RECEIPT OF THIS NOTICE. IF YOU ARE HEARING OR VOICE IMPAIRED, CALL 1-800-955-8771.
117
+
118
+ CASE NO. 2006087931 HY
119
+
120
+ NAME: Te Broy Epstein
121
+
122
+ TERM OF Prob / Sex Off / Drug Off Prob / C.C. I C.C. II: 12 mos yrs as to Cts.
123
+
124
+ conc w/ consec. w/ \_\_\_\_\_
125
+
126
+ Probation transferred to:
127
+
128
+ SPECIAL CONDITIONS:
129
+
130
+ - Complete Originally Ordered Conditions
131
+ - Curfew: \_\_\_\_\_ p.m., with the following exception: \_\_\_\_\_
132
+ - Deft. to report to Prob. Dept. immediately upon release
133
+ - Deft. not to have in care, custody, or control any unlawful or illegal material, subst., device, or object.
134
+ - Deft. to immediately notify Prob. Officer if place of residence or job changes.
135
+ - Restitution CRO filed
136
+ - Subject to all ordinary and special conditions of Probation
137
+
138
+ Substance Abuse Eval. / Psychological Eval. / Psychosexual Eval. within / by: \_\_\_\_\_
139
+ and deft. to successfully complete recommended treatment
140
+
141
+ - Random Drug/Alcohol Testing At Deft's Expense Costs Waived
142
+ - No Consumption/Possession of Alcohol or Drugs or Intoxicants without a Prescription.
143
+ - Attend \_\_\_\_\_ AA and/or NA Meetings per Week.
144
+ - Deft. not to frequent any place of business whose primary purpose is the sale of alcohol.
145
+
146
+ Complete \_\_\_\_\_ Hrs. of Community Service to be done at the rate of \_\_\_\_\_ Hrs. per Wk / Mo.(Min.)
147
+
148
+ License Revoked / Suspended for \_\_\_\_\_ mos / yrs
149
+
150
+ Attend and successfully complete DUI school and 1 session of Victim Impact Panel
151
+
152
+ No Contact / No Violent Contact / No Direct or Indirect contact w/Victim(s) or others listed:
153
+
154
+ No Contact w/Minor Children w/o Adult Supervision aware of this case and the disposition.
155
+
156
+ Cost of Supervision: \$ \_\_\_\_\_ per month Waived by Court. \_\_\_\_\_
157
+
158
+ Enter and Successfully Complete DOC Non-Secure Bed Program and Any Recommended Aftercare.
159
+
160
+ Hold in Custody, release only to DOC Non-Secure Bed Program Officer.
161
+
162
+ Enter and Successfully Complete PBSO Long / Short Track Drug Farm and Any Rec. Aftercare.
163
+
164
+ Enter and Complete: Anger Management Program Batterers Intervention Program
165
+
166
+ Theft Abatement Program: \_\_\_\_\_ Other: \_\_\_\_\_
167
+
168
+ Defendant may apply for Early Termination after \_\_\_\_\_, provided all conds. are satisfied.
169
+
170
+ Serve \_\_\_\_\_ days / months in PBCJ, with credit for \_\_\_\_\_ days / months.
171
+
172
+ See all attached documents
173
+
174
+ Deft. must hold an ASA Secure Offender
175
+
176
+ w/+N 48 hours of Pre/Pose
177
+
178
+ \_\_\_\_\_
179
+
180
+ \_\_\_\_\_
181
+
182
+ \_\_\_\_\_
183
+
184
+ \_\_\_\_\_
marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740397/EFTA02740397.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,199 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740397.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 4,
15
+ "chars": 9003,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 15.96,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "EXHIBIT A",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 204.18,
27
+ 330.48
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 404.91693115234375,
31
+ 330.48
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 404.91693115234375,
35
+ 368.80364990234375
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 204.18,
39
+ 368.80364990234375
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "SPECIAL CONDITIONS:",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 3,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 39.975,
50
+ 133.65
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 169.12500000000003,
54
+ 133.65
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 169.12500000000003,
58
+ 149.85000000000002
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 39.975,
62
+ 149.85000000000002
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ }
66
+ ],
67
+ "page_stats": [
68
+ {
69
+ "page_id": 0,
70
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
71
+ "block_counts": [
72
+ [
73
+ "Span",
74
+ 5
75
+ ],
76
+ [
77
+ "Line",
78
+ 3
79
+ ],
80
+ [
81
+ "PageHeader",
82
+ 1
83
+ ],
84
+ [
85
+ "SectionHeader",
86
+ 1
87
+ ],
88
+ [
89
+ "PageFooter",
90
+ 1
91
+ ]
92
+ ],
93
+ "block_metadata": {
94
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
95
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
96
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
97
+ "previous_text": "",
98
+ "previous_type": "",
99
+ "previous_order": 0
100
+ }
101
+ },
102
+ {
103
+ "page_id": 1,
104
+ "text_extraction_method": "surya",
105
+ "block_counts": [
106
+ [
107
+ "Text",
108
+ 12
109
+ ],
110
+ [
111
+ "Form",
112
+ 3
113
+ ],
114
+ [
115
+ "PageFooter",
116
+ 3
117
+ ],
118
+ [
119
+ "PageHeader",
120
+ 2
121
+ ]
122
+ ],
123
+ "block_metadata": {
124
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
125
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
126
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
127
+ "previous_text": "",
128
+ "previous_type": "",
129
+ "previous_order": 0
130
+ }
131
+ },
132
+ {
133
+ "page_id": 2,
134
+ "text_extraction_method": "surya",
135
+ "block_counts": [
136
+ [
137
+ "Text",
138
+ 65
139
+ ],
140
+ [
141
+ "PageFooter",
142
+ 4
143
+ ],
144
+ [
145
+ "PageHeader",
146
+ 2
147
+ ],
148
+ [
149
+ "ListGroup",
150
+ 1
151
+ ]
152
+ ],
153
+ "block_metadata": {
154
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
155
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
156
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
157
+ "previous_text": "",
158
+ "previous_type": "",
159
+ "previous_order": 0
160
+ }
161
+ },
162
+ {
163
+ "page_id": 3,
164
+ "text_extraction_method": "surya",
165
+ "block_counts": [
166
+ [
167
+ "Text",
168
+ 38
169
+ ],
170
+ [
171
+ "PageFooter",
172
+ 4
173
+ ],
174
+ [
175
+ "PageHeader",
176
+ 3
177
+ ],
178
+ [
179
+ "ListGroup",
180
+ 3
181
+ ],
182
+ [
183
+ "SectionHeader",
184
+ 2
185
+ ]
186
+ ],
187
+ "block_metadata": {
188
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
189
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
190
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
191
+ "previous_text": "",
192
+ "previous_type": "",
193
+ "previous_order": 0
194
+ }
195
+ }
196
+ ],
197
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02740397"
198
+ }
199
+ }
marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740401/EFTA02740401.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
2
+
3
+ CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRA-
4
+
5
+ JANE DOE NO. 4,
6
+
7
+ Plaintiff,
8
+
9
+ vs.
10
+
11
+ JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
12
+
13
+ Defendant.
14
+
15
+ ## DEFENDANT'S NOTICE CONCERNING MOTION TO STAY fDE 131
16
+
17
+ In connection with his motion to stay this action [DE 13], Defendant Jeffrey Epstein hereby notifies the Court that the State Court action, State of Florida v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 2006 CF 09454 AXX (Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County), was resolved on June 30, 2008. See Final Disposition sheets, attached hereto as Exhibit A. The federal criminal proceeding, however, remains pending.
18
+
19
+ Respectfully submitted,
20
+
21
+ ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER & WEISS, P.A.
22
+
23
+ 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Tel: 561 659 8300 Fax: 561 835 8691
24
+
25
+ By: /s/ Jack A. Goldberger
26
+
27
+ Jack A. Goldberger
28
+
29
+ Fla. Bar No. 262013
30
+
31
+ jgoldberger@ agwpa.com
32
+
33
+ Attorneys for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
34
+
35
+ ## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
36
+
37
+ I HEREBY CERTIFY that on July 1, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on counsel of record identified below by facsimile and U.S. Mail.
38
+
39
+ Jeffrey M. Herman, Esq. Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Herman & Mermelstein, P.A. 18205 Biscayne Blvd, Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160 Fax: 305 931 0877
40
+
41
+ > /s/ Jack A. Goldberger Jack A. Goldberger
marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740401/EFTA02740401.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,204 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740401.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 3,
15
+ "chars": 1427,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 0.79,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 184.82399999999998,
27
+ 87.48
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 417.3464050292969,
31
+ 87.48
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 417.3464050292969,
35
+ 120.88092041015625
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 184.82399999999998,
39
+ 120.88092041015625
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "DEFENDANT'S NOTICE CONCERNING MOTION TO STAY fDE 131",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 85.06800000000001,
50
+ 353.96999999999997
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 529.7177124023438,
54
+ 353.96999999999997
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 529.7177124023438,
58
+ 370.2509460449219
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 85.06800000000001,
62
+ 370.2509460449219
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ },
66
+ {
67
+ "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
68
+ "heading_level": null,
69
+ "page_id": 2,
70
+ "polygon": [
71
+ [
72
+ 212.97599999999997,
73
+ 72.08999999999999
74
+ ],
75
+ [
76
+ 405.20263671875,
77
+ 72.08999999999999
78
+ ],
79
+ [
80
+ 405.20263671875,
81
+ 89.00091552734375
82
+ ],
83
+ [
84
+ 212.97599999999997,
85
+ 89.00091552734375
86
+ ]
87
+ ]
88
+ }
89
+ ],
90
+ "page_stats": [
91
+ {
92
+ "page_id": 0,
93
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
94
+ "block_counts": [
95
+ [
96
+ "Span",
97
+ 46
98
+ ],
99
+ [
100
+ "Line",
101
+ 24
102
+ ],
103
+ [
104
+ "Text",
105
+ 11
106
+ ],
107
+ [
108
+ "SectionHeader",
109
+ 2
110
+ ],
111
+ [
112
+ "PageHeader",
113
+ 1
114
+ ],
115
+ [
116
+ "PageFooter",
117
+ 1
118
+ ]
119
+ ],
120
+ "block_metadata": {
121
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
122
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
123
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
124
+ "previous_text": "",
125
+ "previous_type": "",
126
+ "previous_order": 0
127
+ }
128
+ },
129
+ {
130
+ "page_id": 1,
131
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
132
+ "block_counts": [
133
+ [
134
+ "Span",
135
+ 16
136
+ ],
137
+ [
138
+ "Line",
139
+ 8
140
+ ],
141
+ [
142
+ "Text",
143
+ 5
144
+ ],
145
+ [
146
+ "PageFooter",
147
+ 2
148
+ ],
149
+ [
150
+ "PageHeader",
151
+ 1
152
+ ]
153
+ ],
154
+ "block_metadata": {
155
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
156
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
157
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
158
+ "previous_text": "",
159
+ "previous_type": "",
160
+ "previous_order": 0
161
+ }
162
+ },
163
+ {
164
+ "page_id": 2,
165
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
166
+ "block_counts": [
167
+ [
168
+ "Span",
169
+ 33
170
+ ],
171
+ [
172
+ "Line",
173
+ 17
174
+ ],
175
+ [
176
+ "Text",
177
+ 3
178
+ ],
179
+ [
180
+ "PageFooter",
181
+ 2
182
+ ],
183
+ [
184
+ "PageHeader",
185
+ 1
186
+ ],
187
+ [
188
+ "SectionHeader",
189
+ 1
190
+ ]
191
+ ],
192
+ "block_metadata": {
193
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
194
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
195
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
196
+ "previous_text": "",
197
+ "previous_type": "",
198
+ "previous_order": 0
199
+ }
200
+ }
201
+ ],
202
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02740401"
203
+ }
204
+ }
marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740404/EFTA02740404.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
2
+
3
+ CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRA-~
4
+
5
+ JANE DOE NO. 4,
6
+
7
+ Plaintiff,
8
+
9
+ vs.
10
+
11
+ JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
12
+
13
+ Defendant.
14
+
15
+ ## NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS CO-COUNSEL
16
+
17
+ NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the law firm of Tein, P.L. enters its appearance as co-counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein in these proceedings.
18
+
19
+ Respectfully submitted,
20
+
21
+ TEIN, P.L. 3059 Grand Avenue, Suite 340 Coconut Grove, Florida 33133 Tel: 305 442 1101 Fax: 305 442 6744
22
+
23
+ By: Is/ Michael R. Tein GUY A. Fla. Bar No. 623740 MICHAEL R. TEIN Ha. Bar No. 993522 tein@lewistein.com
24
+
25
+ ## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
26
+
27
+ I HEREBY CERTIFY that on July 7, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record identified on the following service list via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF.
28
+
29
+ > /s/ Michael R. Tein Michael R. Tein
30
+
31
+ ## SERVICE LIST
32
+
33
+ Jeffrey M. Herman, Esq. Stuart S. Mcrme!stein. Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Herman & Mennelstein, P.A. 18205 Biscayne Blvd, Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160 Fax: 305 931 0877
marker2/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740404/EFTA02740404.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,231 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-4-v-epstein/EFTA02740404.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 3,
15
+ "chars": 1164,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 0.76,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 200.73600000000002,
27
+ 84.24
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 400.70098876953125,
31
+ 84.24
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 400.70098876953125,
35
+ 113.9830322265625
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 200.73600000000002,
39
+ 113.9830322265625
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS CO-COUNSEL",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 176.25599999999997,
50
+ 315.9
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 436.06396484375,
54
+ 315.9
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 436.06396484375,
58
+ 331.10302734375
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 176.25599999999997,
62
+ 331.10302734375
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ },
66
+ {
67
+ "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
68
+ "heading_level": null,
69
+ "page_id": 1,
70
+ "polygon": [
71
+ [
72
+ 223.38,
73
+ 70.47
74
+ ],
75
+ [
76
+ 388.5423889160156,
77
+ 70.47
78
+ ],
79
+ [
80
+ 388.5423889160156,
81
+ 86.2330322265625
82
+ ],
83
+ [
84
+ 223.38,
85
+ 86.2330322265625
86
+ ]
87
+ ]
88
+ },
89
+ {
90
+ "title": "SERVICE LIST",
91
+ "heading_level": null,
92
+ "page_id": 2,
93
+ "polygon": [
94
+ [
95
+ 260.712,
96
+ 69.66
97
+ ],
98
+ [
99
+ 351.1127014160156,
100
+ 69.66
101
+ ],
102
+ [
103
+ 351.1127014160156,
104
+ 85.447021484375
105
+ ],
106
+ [
107
+ 260.712,
108
+ 85.447021484375
109
+ ]
110
+ ]
111
+ }
112
+ ],
113
+ "page_stats": [
114
+ {
115
+ "page_id": 0,
116
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
117
+ "block_counts": [
118
+ [
119
+ "Span",
120
+ 49
121
+ ],
122
+ [
123
+ "Line",
124
+ 25
125
+ ],
126
+ [
127
+ "Text",
128
+ 10
129
+ ],
130
+ [
131
+ "SectionHeader",
132
+ 2
133
+ ],
134
+ [
135
+ "PageHeader",
136
+ 1
137
+ ],
138
+ [
139
+ "PageFooter",
140
+ 1
141
+ ]
142
+ ],
143
+ "block_metadata": {
144
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
145
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
146
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
147
+ "previous_text": "",
148
+ "previous_type": "",
149
+ "previous_order": 0
150
+ }
151
+ },
152
+ {
153
+ "page_id": 1,
154
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
155
+ "block_counts": [
156
+ [
157
+ "Span",
158
+ 17
159
+ ],
160
+ [
161
+ "Line",
162
+ 9
163
+ ],
164
+ [
165
+ "Text",
166
+ 2
167
+ ],
168
+ [
169
+ "PageHeader",
170
+ 1
171
+ ],
172
+ [
173
+ "SectionHeader",
174
+ 1
175
+ ],
176
+ [
177
+ "PageFooter",
178
+ 1
179
+ ]
180
+ ],
181
+ "block_metadata": {
182
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
183
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
184
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
185
+ "previous_text": "",
186
+ "previous_type": "",
187
+ "previous_order": 0
188
+ }
189
+ },
190
+ {
191
+ "page_id": 2,
192
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
193
+ "block_counts": [
194
+ [
195
+ "Span",
196
+ 19
197
+ ],
198
+ [
199
+ "Line",
200
+ 10
201
+ ],
202
+ [
203
+ "PageHeader",
204
+ 1
205
+ ],
206
+ [
207
+ "SectionHeader",
208
+ 1
209
+ ],
210
+ [
211
+ "Text",
212
+ 1
213
+ ],
214
+ [
215
+ "PageFooter",
216
+ 1
217
+ ]
218
+ ],
219
+ "block_metadata": {
220
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
221
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
222
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
223
+ "previous_text": "",
224
+ "previous_type": "",
225
+ "previous_order": 0
226
+ }
227
+ }
228
+ ],
229
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02740404"
230
+ }
231
+ }