MEMY-1805 marker2 court-doe-103-v-epstein (salt 4090): 53/53

marker2/court-doe-103-v-epstein/EFTA02739126/EFTA02739126.md

@@ -0,0 +1,318 @@
+ave" (al 03/e4/0 Sealed
+
+### IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Civil Action No.
+
+1 0 - 8 0 3 0 9
+
+JANE DOE No. 103,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+v.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+![](_page_0_Picture_10.jpeg)
+
+### COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JUR\ TRIAL
+
+Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 103 ("Plaintifff'), brings this Complaint against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein ("Defendant"), and states as follows:
+
+# PARTIES. JURISDICTION, AND VENUE
+
+- 1. At all times material to this cause of action, Plaintiff was a resident of Palm Beach County, Florida.
+- 2. This Complaint is brought under a fictitious name to protect the identity of Plaintiff because this Complaint makes sensitive allegations of sexual assault and abuse of a then minor.
+- 3. At all times material to this cause of action, Defendant owned a residence located at 358 El Brillo Way, Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida.
+- 4. Defendant is presently a citizen of the United States Virgin Islands. Pursuant to the plea agreement entered by the Defendant in state court and the sentencing which occurred on June 30, 2008, Defendant is currently under community control in Palm Beach County, Florida.
+
+- 5. Defendant is an adult male born on January 20, 1953.
+- 6. This Court has jurisdiction over this action and the claims set forth herein pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255.
+- 7. This Court has venue of this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b), as a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred in this District.
+
+# STATEMENT OF FACTS
+
+8. At all relevant times, Defendant was an adult male spanning the ages of 45 and 55 years old. Defendant is known as a billionaire financier and money manager with a secret clientele limited exclusively to billionaires. He is a man of tremendous wealth, power, and influence. He owns a fleet of aircraft that includes a Gulfstream IV, a helicopter, and a Boeing 727, as well as a fleet of motor vehicles. Until his incarceration pursuant to the plea entered and sentencing, which occurred on June 30, 2008, he maintained his principal place of residence in the largest dwelling in Manhattan, a 51,000-square-foot eight-story mansion on the Upper East Side. He also owns a \$6.8 million mansion in Palm Beach, Florida, a \$30 million 7,500-acre ranch in New Mexico he named "Zorro," a 70-acre private island known as Little St. James in the U.S. Virgin Islands, a mansion in London's Westminster neighborhood, and another residence in the Avenue Foch area of Paris. The allegations herein concern Defendant's conduct while at his lavish residence in Palm Beach and numerous other locations both nationally and internationally.
+
+9. Defendant has a sexual preference for underage minor girls. He engaged in a plan, scheme, or enterprise in which he gained access to countless vulnerable and relatively economically disadvantaged minor girls, and sexually assaulted, molested, and/or exploited these girls, and then gave them money.
+
+10. Beginning in or around 1998 through in or around September 2007, Defendant used his resources and his influence over vulnerable minor girls to engage in a systematic pattern of sexually exploitative behavior.
+
+11. Defendant's plan and scheme reflected a particular pattern and method. Defendant coerced and enticed impressionable, vulnerable, and relatively economically less fortunate minor girls to participate in various acts of sexual misconduct that he committed upon them. Defendant's scheme involved the use of underage girls, as well as other individuals, to recruit underage girls. Defendant and/or an authorized agent would call and alert Defendant's assistants shortly before or after he arrived at his Palm Beach residence. His assistants would call economically disadvantaged and underage girls from West Palm Beach and surrounding areas who would be enticed by the money being offered and who Defendant and/or his assistants perceived as less likely to complain to authorities or have credibility issues if allegations of improper conduct were made. The then minor Plaintiff and other minor girls, some as young as 14 years old, were transported to Defendant's Palm Beach mansion by Defendant's employees, agents, and/or assistants in order to provide Defendant with "massages."
+
+12. Many of the instances of illegal sexual conduct committed by Defendant were perpetrated with the assistance, support, and facilitation of at least three assistants who helped him orchestrate this child exploitation enterprise. These assistants would arrange times for underage girls to come to Defendant's residence, transport or cause the transportation of underage girls to Defendant's residence, escort the underage girls to the massage room where Defendant would be waiting or would enter shortly thereafter, urge the underage girls to remove their clothes, deliver cash from Defendant to the underage girls and/or their procurers at the conclusion of each "massage appointment," and assist Defendant in taking nude photographs
+
+and/or videos of the underage girls with and/or without their knowledge. Defendant would pay the procurer of each girl's "appointment" hundreds of dollars.
+
+13. Defendant designed this scheme to secure a private place in Defendant's Palm Beach mansion where only persons employed and invited by Defendant would be present, so as to reduce the chance of detection of Defendant's sexual abuse and/or exploitation, as well as to make it more difficult for the minor girls to flee the premises and/or to credibly report his actions to law enforcement or other authorities. The girls were usually transported by his employee(s), agent(s), and/or assistant(s) and/or by taxicab(s) and/or motor vehicle(s) paid for by Defendant, which also made it difficult for the girls to flee his mansion.
+
+14. Upon her initial arrival at Defendant's Palm Beach mansion, each underage victim would generally be introduced to one of Defendant's assistants, who would gather the girl's personal contact information. The minor girl would be led up a remote flight of stairs to a room that contained a massage table and a large shower.
+
+15. At times, if it was the girl's first "massage" appointment, another female would be in the room to "lead the way." Generally the other female would leave, or Defendant would dismiss her. Often, Defendant would start his massage wearing only a small towel, which eventually would be removed. Defendant and/or the other female would direct the girl to massage him, giving the minor girl specific instructions as to where and how he wanted to be touched, and then direct her to remove her clothing. Defendant would then perform one or more lewd, lascivious, and sexual acts, including masturbation; fondling the minor's breasts and/or sexual organs; touching the minor's vulva, vagina, and/or anus with a vibrator, back massager, his finger(s), and/or his penis; digitally penetrating her vagina; performing intercourse, oral sex, and/or anal sex; and/or coercing or attempting to coerce the girl to engage in lewd acts and/or
+
+prostitution and/or enticing the then minor girl to engage in sexual acts with another female in Defendant's presence. The exact degree of molestation and frequency with which the sexual exploitations took place varied and is not yet completely known; however, Defendant committed such acts regularly on a daily basis and, in most instances, several times a day. In order to facilitate the daily exchanges of money for sexual assault and abuse, Defendant kept U.S. currency readily available.
+
+16. Defendant traveled out of Florida to Palm Beach for the purpose of luring minor girls to his mansion to sexually abuse and/or batter them. He used the telephone to contact these minor girls for the purpose of coercing them into acts of prostitution and to enable himself to commit sexual battery against them and/or acts of lewdness in their presence, and he conspired with others, including his employee(s), assistant(s), driver(s), pilot(s), and/or agent(s), to facilitate these acts and to avoid police detection. Defendant's systematic pattern of sexually exploitative behavior described above also occurred in Defendant's other domestic and/or international residences, places of lodging, and/or modes of transportation.
+
+17. Consistent with the foregoing plan and scheme, Defendant used his money, wealth, and power to unduly and improperly manipulate and influence the then minor Plaintiff. A vulnerable young girl, Plaintiff was merely a seventeen year old high school student when she was first lured into Defendant's sexually exploitative world in or about January 2004. Plaintiff was recruited while at work by a co-worker, one of the minor victims Defendant paid to procure underage females. Plaintiff went to Defendant's Palm Beach mansion accompanied by this coworker. Upon arriving, Plaintiff was led by one of Defendant's assistants up a flight of stairs to a spa room with a shower and a massage table. Defendant entered this room wearing only a towel. Defendant suddenly removed his towel, exposing his naked body, and then lay on the massage
+
+table. Defendant told Plaintiff to massage his back and take off her clothing, which she refused to do. Defendant then began to try to touch the minor Plaintiff and/or take off her clothing. After Defendant's relentless pawing, she reluctantly removed some of her clothing. During this encounter, Defendant turned over on his back and fondled Plaintiff's breasts, despite her repeatedly telling him not to do so. As Plaintiff massaged Defendant, Defendant proceeded to masturbate until ejaculation. Defendant then paid Plaintiff two hundred dollars, and Plaintiff was escorted out of Defendant's mansion and left Defendant's property.
+
+18. A similar pattern of grooming continued, and the sexual exploitation progressively escalated, over the course of approximately seventeen months during which Defendant would often travel to Palm Beach. Prior to arriving and w!..iie in Palm Beach, Defendant and/or his agent(s) would frequently call Plaintiff at her home telephone number and/or other telephone numbers, arranging for encounters with her for Defendant, sometimes twice daily. While usually such contacts were made by his assistants, Defendant personally called Plaintiff repeatedly, despite being told to leave Plaintiff alone. After the first few encounters, Defendant coerced Plaintiff to remove all her clothing, and Defendant penetrated the minor Plaintiffs vagina digitally. Defendant sexually abused and/or battered and/or exploited Plaintiff at least a hundred times between approximately January 2004 and May 2005. Such exploitation included, but was not limited to, Defendant's sexual abuse and battery of Plaintiff with vibrator(s), back massager(s), his finger(s), and his penis. At times, Defendant manipulated Plaintiff to interact sexually with another female. During one encounter, Defendant penetrated the minor Plaintiff's vagina with his penis, all the while narrating and demonstrating his sexual battery of Plaintiff to another female present in the room. While some of the precise dates that Defendant's acts of sexual exploitation occurred are unknown to Plaintiff, these dates are known
+
+to Defendant, as he and/or his assistants kept written records, some of which are in the custody of law enforcement, of each instance in which he committed lewd acts upon minor girls, including the then minor Plaintiff.
+
+19. Defendant's preference for underage girls was well-known to those who regularly procured them for him. The above-described acts of abuse began to occur during a time when Defendant knew that Plaintiff was a minor. Defendant, at all times material to this cause of action, knew and/or should have known of Plaintiff's age of minority. In fact, Defendant repeatedly urged the minor Plaintiff to become legally emancipated in order to accompany him as he traveled, both nationally and internationally. Additionally, Defendant, knowing that Plaintiff was merely seventeen years old, lured her by inviting her to stay with him at his mansion in Manhattan and arranging and/or paying for airplane tickets, theater tickets, and a personal chauffeur as gifts for her upcoming birthday.
+
+20. As part of Defendant's persistent process of grooming Plaintiff and immersing her in his lewd and abusive lifestyle, Defendant regularly showered the ado/ recent Plaintiff with gifts, including, but not limited to lingerie, flowers, bikini bathing suit(s), art book(s), purse(s), envelopes of U.S. currency, use of a car, and/or other accoutrements.
+
+21. Defendant possessed photographs of nude underage girls, some of which may have been taken with hidden cameras set up in his residence in Palm Beach. On the day of Defendant's arrest, police found two hidden cameras and photographs of underage girls in Defendant's mansion. Defendant took lewd photographs of Plaintiff with his hidden cameras and transported lewd photographs of Plaintiff and other victims elsewhere using a facility or means of interstate and/or foreign commerce. On one occasion, Defendant manipulated the minor Plaintiff to pose nude for him and photographed her using several rolls of film. One or
+
+more of those nude photographs of Plaintiff that were taken by the Defendant when she was a minor were confiscated by the Palm Beach Police Department during its execution of a search warrant of Defendant's Palm Beach mansion on October 20,2005.
+
+22. Defendant was particularly skillful at discerning his minor victims' respective hopes, dreams, and ambitions. As he did with many of his victims, Defendant lured Plaintiff early-on with modeling opportunities, impressing her with his modeling business and contacts with supermodels, indicating that he could help her with a modeling career.
+
+23. Knowing that the minor Plaintiff was an excellent student and desired to attend New York University or Columbia University, Defendant pretended to show great interest in her college admission, and offered to help her with her applications and to assist her with her tuition. Defendant had told Plaintiff of his substantial connections within the academic community, a matter about which he often bragged. Defendant took it upon himself to take control of Plaintiff's college application process and led Plaintiff to believe that he was sincere about helping her. Even though she had earned a Bright Futures Scholarship to the Florida college of her choice, Defendant insisted that she would not need it, and that, with his involvement, she would be admitted into one or both of the universities in New York. As a result of Defendant's manipulation, Plaintiff did not apply timely for the Bright Futures Scholarship or to any college, and therefore missed the fall semester of her freshman year. When the Palm Beach Police Department executed the search warrant on Defendant's mansion, among the artifacts found and confiscated were Plaintiff's high school transcript.
+
+24. In June 2008, after an investigation by the Palm Beach Police Department, the State Attorney's Office, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the United States Attorney's Office, Defendant entered pleas of "guilty" to one count of solicitation of prostitution, in
+
+violation of Fla. Stat. § 796.07, and one count of solicitation of a minor to engage in prostitution, in violation of Fla. Stat. § 796.03 in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County, Florida.
+
+25. As a condition of that plea, Defendant entered into a Non-Prosecution Agreement, Addendum, and Affirmation (collectively, the "NPA") with the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida on September 24, 2007, October 29, 2007, and December 7, 2007, respectively. In so doing, Defendant acknowledged that Plaintiff was one of his victims and agreed to the following provisions of the NPA :
+
+8. If any of the [acknowledged victims] elects to file suit pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §2255, Epstein will not contest the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida over his person and/or the subject matter, and Epstein waives his right to contest liability and also waives his right to contest damages up to an amount agreed to between the identified individual and Epstein, so long as the identified individual elects to proceed exclusively under 18 U.S.C. §2255, and agrees to waive any other claim for damages, whether pursuant to state, federal or common law.
+
+10. Except as to those individuals who elect to proceed exclusively under 18 U.S.C. §2255, as set forth in paragraph (8), supra, neither Epstein's signature on this agreement, nor its terms, nor any resulting waivers or settlements by Epstein are to be construed as admissions of evidence or evidence of civil or criminal liability or a waive of any jurisdictional or other defense as to any person, whether or not her name appears on the list provided by the United States (emphasis added).
+
+26. Plaintiff was among the individuals identified by the United States Attorney's Office as victims of Defendant upon whose testimony it intended to base its federal prosecution of Defendant for his illegal conduct. Consequently, Defendant is estopped by his state court plea and the Non-Prosecution Agreement from denying the acts alleged in this Complaint and must effectively admit liability to Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 103.
+
+# COUNT ONE
+
+### iCause of Action for Coercion and Enticement of Minor to Enaays in Prostitution or Sexual Activity pursuant to 18 U.S.C. & 2255 in Violation of 18 U.S.C. & 2422(1)))
+
+27. Plaintiff hereby adopts, repeats, realleges, and incorporates by reference the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 26 above.
+
+28. Defendant used a facility or means of interstate and/or foreign commerce to knowingly persuade, induce, entice, or coerce Plaintiff, when she was under the age of 18 years, to engage in prostitution and/or sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense, or attempted to do so, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255 in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b).
+
+29. Plaintiff was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255, and, as such, asserts a cause of action against Defendant pursuant to this Section of the United States Code.
+
+30. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 being committed against the then minor Plaintiff by Defendant, Plaintiff has in the past suffered, and will in the future continue to suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological and/or psychiatric trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, confusion, embarrassment, loss of educational opportunities, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy, separation from her family, and other damages associated with Defendant's manipulating and luring her into a perverse and unhealthy way of life. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses, and Plaintiff will in the future incur additional medical and psychological expenses. Plaintiff has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature, and Plaintiff will continue to suffer these losses in the future.
+
+WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment against Defendant for all damages available under 18 U.S.C. § 2255, including, without limitation, actual and compensatory damages, attorney's fees, costs of suit, and such other further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury.
+
+### COUNT TWO (Cause of Action for Travel with Intent to Emote in Illicit Sexual Conduct pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 2255 in Violation of 18 U.S.C. 6 2423(t)1
+
+31. Plaintiff hereby adopts, repeats, realleges, and incorporates by reference the allegations contained in paragraphs I through 26 above.
+
+32. Defendant traveled in interstate and/or foreign commerce for the purpose of engaging in illicit sexual conduct, as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 2423(f), with minor females, including the then minor Plaintiff, in violation of 18 § 2423(b).
+
+33. Plaintiff was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255, and, as such, asserts a cause of action against Defendant pursuant to this Section of the United States Code.
+
+34. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 being committed against the then minor Plaintiff by Defendant, Plaintiff has in the past suffered, and will in the future continue to suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological and/or psychiatric trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, confusion, embarrassment, loss of educational opportunities, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy, separation from her family, and other damages associated with Defendant's manipulating and luring her into a perverse and unhealthy way of life. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses, and Plaintiff will in the future incur additional medical and psychological expenses. Plaintiff has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn
+
+income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injures are permanent in nature, and Plaintiff will continue to suffer these losses in the future.
+
+WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment against Defendant for all damages available under 18 U.S.C. § 2255, including, without limitation, actual and compensatory damages, attorney's fees, costs of suit, and such other further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury.
+
+### COUNT THREE (Cause of Action for Sexual Exploitation of Children pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 in Violation of 18 U.S.C. 6 2251)
+
+35. Plaintiff hereby adopts, repeats, realleges, and incorporates by reference the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 26 above.
+
+36. Defendant knowingly persuaded, induced, enticed, or coerced the then minor Plaintiff to engage in sexually explicit conduct for the purpose of producing a visual depiction of such conduct, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2251.
+
+37. Plaintiff was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255, and, as such, asserts a cause of action against Defendant pursuant to this Section of the United States Code.
+
+38. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 being committed against the then minor Plaintiff by Defendant, Plaintiff has in the past suffered, and will in the future continue to suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological and/or psychiatric trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, confusion, embarrassment, loss of educational opportunities, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy, separation from her family, and other damages associated with Defendant's manipulating and luring her into a perverse and unhealthy way of life. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical
+
+and psychological expenses, and Plaintiff will in the future incur additional medical and psychological expenses. Plaintiff has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature, and Plaintiff will continue to suffer these losses in the future.
+
+WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment against Defendant for all damages available under 18 U.S.C. § 2255, including, without limitation, actual and compensatory damages, attorney's fees, costs of suit, and such other further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury.
+
+# COUNT FOUR
+
+### (Cause of Action for Transport of Visual Depiction of Minor Engaging in Sexually Explicit Conduct pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 in Violation of 18 U.S.C. & 2252(a)(11)
+
+39. Plaintiff hereby adopts, repeats, realleges, and incorporates by reference the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 26 above.
+
+40. Defendant knowingly mailed, transported, shipped, or sent via computer and/or facsimile in or affecting interstate and/or foreign commerce at least one visual depiction of the minor Plaintiff engaging in sexually explicit conduct, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(aX1).
+
+41. Defendant transported lewd photographs of Plaintiff and otbar victims elsewhere using a facility or means of interstate and/or foreign commerce.
+
+42. Plaintiff was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255, and, as such, asserts a cause of action against Defendant pursuant to this Section of the United States Code.
+
+43. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 being committed against the then minor Plaintiff by Defendant, Plaintiff has in the past suffered, and will in the future continue to suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological and/or psychiatric trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, confusion, embarrassment,
+
+loss of educational opportunities, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy, separation from her family, and other damages associated with Defendant's manipulating and luring her into a perverse and unhealthy way of life. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses. and Plaintiff will in the future incur additional medical and psychological expenses. Plaintiff has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature, and Plaintiff will continue to suffer these losses in the future.
+
+WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment against Defendant for all damages available under 18 U.S.C. § 2255, including, without limitation, actual and compensatory damages, attorney's fees, costs of suit, and such other further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury.
+
+### COUNT FIVE (Cause of Action for Transport of Child Pornography pursuant to 18 § 2255 in Violation of 18 U.S.C. & 2252A(a)(1))
+
+44. Plaintiff hereby adopts, repeats, realleges, and incorporates by reference the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 26 above.
+
+45. Defendant knowingly mailed, transported, shipped, or sent via computer and/or facsimile in or affecting interstate and/or foreign commerce child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(aX1).
+
+46. Defendant transported lewd photographs of Plaintiff and other victims elsewhere using a facility or means of interstate and/or foreign commerce.
+
+47. Plaintiff was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255, and, as such, asserts a cause of action against Defendant pursuant to this Section of the United States Code.
+
+48. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 being committed against the then minor Plaintiff by Defendant, Plaintiff has in the past suffered, and will in the future continue to suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological and/or psychiatric trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, confusion, embarrassment, loss of educational opportunities, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy, separation from her family, and other damages associated with Defendant's manipulating and luring her into a perverse and unhealthy way of life. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses, and Plaintiff will in the future incur additional medical and psychological expenses. Plaintiff has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature, and Plaintiff will continue to suffer these losses in the future.
+
+WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment against Defendant for all damages available under 18 U.S.C. § 2255, including, without limitation, actual and compensatory damages, attorney's fees, costs of suit, and such other further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury.
+
+### COUNT SIX (Cause of Action for Entwine in a Child Exploitation Enterprise pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 2255 in Violation of 18 U.S.C. 4 2252A(2)1
+
+49. Plaintiff hereby adopts, repeats, realleges, and incorporates by reference the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 26 above and Counts One through Five above.
+
+50. Defendant knowingly engaged in a child exploitation enterprise, as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(g)(2), in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(gXI). As more fully set forth above, Defendant engaged in actions that constitute countless violations of 18 U.S.C. § 1591 (sex trafficking of children), Chapter 110 (sexual exploitation of children in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§
+
+2251, 2252(a)( I ), and 2252(A)(aX I)), and Chapter 117 (transportation for illegal sexual activity in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2421. 2422(b), and 2423(b)). As more fully set forth above in paragraphs I through 26, Defendant's actions involved countless victims and countless separate incidents of sexual abuse, which he committed against minors, including Plaintiff, in concert with at least three other persons.
+
+51. Plaintiff was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255, and, as such, asserts a cause of action against Defendant pursuant to this Section of the United States Code.
+
+52. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 being committed against the then minor Plaintiff by Defendant, Plaintiff has in the past suffered, and will in the future continue to suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological and/or psychiatric trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, confusion, embarrassment, loss of educational opportunities, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy, separation from her family, and other damages associated with Defendant's manipulating and luring her into a perverse and unhealthy way of life. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses, and Plaintiff will in the future incur additional medical and psychological expenses. Plaintiff has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature, and Plaintiff will continue to suffer these losses in the future.
+
+WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment against Defendant for all damages available under 18 U.S.C. § 2255, including, without limitation, actual and compensatory damages,
+
+attorney's fees, costs of suit, and such other further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury.
+
+Date: , 2010.
+
+Respectfully Submitted,
+
+By: Rrai- C • f24dieot LLD lea
+
+Robert C. Josef
+
+Bar No. 040856
+
+Katherine W. Ezell
+
+Bar No. 114771
+
+Podhurst Orseck, P.A.
+
+25 West Flagler St., Suite 800
+
+Miami, Florida 33130
+
+Telephone: (305) 358-2800
+
+Fax: (305) 358-2382
+
+riosefsberei400dhurst.com
+
+kezell(Thoodhurst.com
+
+Attorneys for Plaintiff
+
+*Wife 1018042*
+
+The JS 44 civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replace nor supplement the filing and service of pleadings or other papers as required by law, except as provided by local rules of court. This form, approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September 1974, is required for the use of the Clerk of Court for the purpose of initiating the civil docket sheet. (SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON THE REVERSE OF THE FORM.) **NOTICE: Attorneys MUST Indicate Sealed Filed Cases Below.**
+
+**I. (a) PLAINTIFFS**
+
+Jane Doe No. 103
+
+**10-80309**
+
+**DEFENDANTS**
+
+Joseph Eps
+
+**FILED by SB D.C.**
+
+County of Residence of First Listed Defendant (IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES ONLY) **United States Virgin Island**
+
+**(b) County of Residence of First Listed Plaintiff West Palm Beach**  
+(EXCEPT IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES)
+
+**(c) Attorney's (Firm Name, Address, and Telephone Number)**
+
+**NOTE: IN LAND CONDEMNATION CASES, INDICATE DOCKET ONLY THE TRACT LAND INVOLVED.**
+
+Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq./Katherine W. Ezell, Esq.  
+Podhurst Orseck, P.A.  
+25 W. Flagler St., Suite 800  
+Miami FL 33130
+
+Attorneys (If Known)  
+Robert D. Critton, Esq., Burman, Clinton, Podhurst, C.M.W., LLP,  
+303 Banyan Blvd., Suite 400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+
+**(d) Check County Where Action Arose:**  MIAMI- DADE  MONROE  BROWARD  PALM BEACH  ST. LUCIE  INDIAN RIVER  OKEECHOBEE HIGHLANDS
+
+**II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION**
+
+ 1 U.S. Government Plaintiff  3 Federal Question (U.S. Government Not a Party)  
+ 2 U.S. Government Defendant  4 Diversity (Indicate Citizenship of Parties in Item III)
+
+**III. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES**
+
+(For Diversity Cases Only) (Place an "X" in One Box for Plaintiff and One Box for Defendant)
+
+| Citizen of This State                 | PTF                                   | DEF                        | PTF                        | DEF                        |
+|---------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|----------------------------|----------------------------|----------------------------|
+| <input checked="" type="checkbox"/> 1 | <input type="checkbox"/> 1            | <input type="checkbox"/> 1 | <input type="checkbox"/> 4 | <input type="checkbox"/> 4 |
+| <input type="checkbox"/> 2            | <input checked="" type="checkbox"/> 2 | <input type="checkbox"/> 2 | <input type="checkbox"/> 5 | <input type="checkbox"/> 5 |
+| <input type="checkbox"/> 3            | <input type="checkbox"/> 3            | <input type="checkbox"/> 3 | <input type="checkbox"/> 6 | <input type="checkbox"/> 6 |
+
+**IV. NATURE OF SUIT**
+
+| CONTRACT                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          | TORTS                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           | FORFEITURE/PENALTY                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 | BANKRUPTCY                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     | OTHER STATUTES                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
+|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| <input type="checkbox"/> 110 Insurance<br><input type="checkbox"/> 120 Marine<br><input type="checkbox"/> 130 Act<br><input type="checkbox"/> 140 Negotiable Instrument<br><input type="checkbox"/> 150 Recovery of Overpayment & Enforcement of Judgment<br><input type="checkbox"/> 151 Medicare Act<br><input type="checkbox"/> 152 Recovery of Defaulted Student Loans (Excl. Veterans)<br><input type="checkbox"/> 153 Recovery of Overpayment of Veteran's Benefits<br><input type="checkbox"/> 160 Stockholders' Suits<br><input type="checkbox"/> 190 Other Contract<br><input type="checkbox"/> 195 Contract Product Liability<br><input type="checkbox"/> 196 Franchise | <b>PERSONAL INJURY</b><br><input type="checkbox"/> 310 Airplane<br><input type="checkbox"/> 315 Airplane Product Liability<br><input type="checkbox"/> 320 Assault, Libel & Slander<br><input type="checkbox"/> 330 Federal Employers' Liability<br><input type="checkbox"/> 340 Marine<br><input type="checkbox"/> 345 Marine Product Liability<br><input type="checkbox"/> 350 Motor Vehicle<br><input type="checkbox"/> 355 Motor Vehicle Product Liability<br><input checked="" type="checkbox"/> 360 Other Personal Injury | <b>PERSONAL INJURY</b><br><input type="checkbox"/> 362 Personal Injury - Med. Malpractice<br><input type="checkbox"/> 365 Personal Injury - Product Liability<br><input type="checkbox"/> 368 Asbestos Personal Injury Product Liability<br><b>PERSONAL PROPERTY</b><br><input type="checkbox"/> 370 Other Fraud<br><input type="checkbox"/> 371 Truth in Londing<br><input type="checkbox"/> 380 Other Personal Property Damage<br><input type="checkbox"/> 385 Property Damage Product Liability | <input type="checkbox"/> 610 Agriculture<br><input type="checkbox"/> 620 Other Food & Drug<br><input type="checkbox"/> 625 Drug Related Seizure of Property 21 USC 881<br><input type="checkbox"/> 630 Liquor Laws<br><input type="checkbox"/> 640 R.R. & Truck<br><input type="checkbox"/> 650 Airline Regs.<br><input type="checkbox"/> 660 Occupational Safety/Health<br><input type="checkbox"/> 690 Other | <input type="checkbox"/> 422 Appeal 28 USC 158<br><input type="checkbox"/> 423 Withdrawal 28 USC 157<br><b>PROPERTY RIGHTS</b><br><input type="checkbox"/> 820 Copyrights<br><input type="checkbox"/> 830 Patent<br><input type="checkbox"/> 840 Trademark<br><b>LABOR</b><br><input type="checkbox"/> 710 Fair Labor Standards Act<br><input type="checkbox"/> 720 Labor/Mgmt. Relations<br><input type="checkbox"/> 730 Labor/Mgmt. Reporting & Disclosure Act<br><input type="checkbox"/> 740 Railway Labor Act<br><input type="checkbox"/> 790 Other Labor Litigation<br><input type="checkbox"/> 791 Empl. Ret. Inc. Security Act | <input type="checkbox"/> 862 Black Lung (923)<br><input type="checkbox"/> 863 DIWC/DIWW (405(g))<br><input type="checkbox"/> 864 SSID Title XVI<br><input type="checkbox"/> 865 RSI (405(g))<br><b>FEDERAL TAX SUITS</b><br><input type="checkbox"/> 870 Taxes (U.S. Plaintiff or Defendant)<br><input type="checkbox"/> 871 IRS—Third Party 26 USC 7609 | <input type="checkbox"/> 400 State Reapportionment<br><input type="checkbox"/> 410 Antitrust<br><input type="checkbox"/> 430 Banks and Banking<br><input type="checkbox"/> 450 Commerce<br><input type="checkbox"/> 460 Deportation<br><input type="checkbox"/> 470 Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations<br><input type="checkbox"/> 480 Consumer Credit<br><input type="checkbox"/> 490 Cable/Sat TV<br><input type="checkbox"/> 810 Selective Service<br><input type="checkbox"/> 850 Securities/Commodities/Exchange<br><input type="checkbox"/> 875 Customer Challenge 12 USC 3410<br><input type="checkbox"/> 890 Other Statutory Actions<br><input type="checkbox"/> 891 Agricultural Acts<br><input type="checkbox"/> 892 Economic Stabilization Act<br><input type="checkbox"/> 893 Environmental Matters<br><input type="checkbox"/> 894 Energy Allocation Act<br><input type="checkbox"/> 895 Freedom of Information Act<br><input type="checkbox"/> 900 Appeal of Foe Determination Under Equal Access to Justice<br><input type="checkbox"/> 950 Constitutionality of State Statutes |
+
+**V. ORIGIN**
+
+ 1 Original Proceeding  2 Removed from State Court  3 Re-filed- (see VI below)  4 Reinstated or Reopened  5 Transferred from another district (specify)  6 Multidistrict  7 Appeal to District Judge from Magistrate Judgment
+
+**VI. RELATED/RE-FILED CASE(S).**
+
+**(See instructions second page):**  
+**a) Re-filed Case  YES  NO b) Related Cases  YES  NO**  
+ JUDGE Kenneth A. Marra DOCKET NUMBER See Attached.
+
+**VII. CAUSE OF ACTION**
+
+Cite the U.S. Civil Statute under which you are filing and Write a Brief Statement of Cause (Do not cite jurisdictional statutes unless diversity):  
+**18 U.S.C. 2255 (Predicate Statutes 18 U.S.C. 2422(b), 2423(b), 2423(e), 2251, 2252, 2252A(a)(1), 2252A(g)(1))**  
+ LENGTH OF TRIAL via 5 days estimated (for both sides to try entire case)
+
+**VIII. REQUESTED IN COMPLAINT:**  CHECK IF THIS IS A CLASS ACTION UNDER F.R.C.P. 23 **DEMAND \$ CHECK YES only if demanded in complaint: In excess of \$ 75,000. or JURY DEMAND:**  Yes  No
+
+**ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE & CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE**  
+ SIGNATURE OF ATTORNEY OF RECORD **S/ Katherine W. Ezell** DATE **2/23/10**  
+ FOR OFFICE USE ONLY  
+ AMOUNT **350.00** RECEIPT # **1018042** IFP **2/23/10**
+
+### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION
+
+# ATTACHMENT TO CIVIL COVER SHEET
+
+FOR: Jane Doe 103 v. Jeffrey Epstein
+
+# VI. RELATED PENDING CASES
+
+08-80119 - KAM
+
+08-80232 - KAM
+
+08-80380 - KAM
+
+08-80381 - KAM
+
+08-80811 - KAM
+
+08-80893 - KAM
+
+08-80993 - KAM
+
+08-80994 - KAM
+
+09-80469 - KAM
+
+09-80802 - KAM
+
+09-81092 - KAM

marker2/court-doe-103-v-epstein/EFTA02739126/EFTA02739126.metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,1266 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-103-v-epstein/EFTA02739126.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 19,
+  "chars": 47777,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 25.19,
+  "image_assets": [
+    "_page_0_Picture_10.jpeg"
+  ],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nFOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA \nCivil Action No.",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            172.815,
+            89.91
+          ],
+          [
+            441.3864440917969,
+            89.91
+          ],
+          [
+            441.3864440917969,
+            131.9830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            172.815,
+            131.9830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JUR\\ TRIAL",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            171.58500000000004,
+            338.58
+          ],
+          [
+            442.9180908203125,
+            338.58
+          ],
+          [
+            442.9180908203125,
+            353.2330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            171.58500000000004,
+            353.2330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "PARTIES. JURISDICTION, AND VENUE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            192.495,
+            421.20000000000005
+          ],
+          [
+            421.7822265625,
+            421.20000000000005
+          ],
+          [
+            421.7822265625,
+            436.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            192.495,
+            436.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "STATEMENT OF FACTS",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            236.16,
+            215.46000000000004
+          ],
+          [
+            379.7556457519531,
+            215.46000000000004
+          ],
+          [
+            379.7556457519531,
+            231.11248779296875
+          ],
+          [
+            236.16,
+            231.11248779296875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "COUNT ONE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            268.14,
+            693.36
+          ],
+          [
+            346.5199279785156,
+            693.36
+          ],
+          [
+            346.5199279785156,
+            710.3625030517578
+          ],
+          [
+            268.14,
+            710.3625030517578
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "iCause of Action for Coercion and Enticement of Minor to Enaays in Prostitution or \nSexual Activity pursuant to 18 U.S.C. & 2255 in Violation of 18 U.S.C. & 2422(1)))",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 9,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            99.01500000000001,
+            77.0675048828125
+          ],
+          [
+            545.1241455078125,
+            77.0675048828125
+          ],
+          [
+            545.1241455078125,
+            106.67999267578125
+          ],
+          [
+            99.01500000000001,
+            106.67999267578125
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "COUNT TWO \n(Cause of Action for Travel with Intent to Emote in Illicit Sexual Conduct pursuant \nto 18 U.S.C. 2255 in Violation of 18 U.S.C. 6 2423(t)1",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 10,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            106.5999984741211,
+            188.73000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            546.735,
+            188.73000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            546.735,
+            231.85247802734375
+          ],
+          [
+            106.5999984741211,
+            231.85247802734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "COUNT THREE \n(Cause of Action for Sexual Exploitation of Children pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 in \nViolation of 18 U.S.C. 6 2251)",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 11,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            106.39499999999998,
+            243.0
+          ],
+          [
+            544.76806640625,
+            243.0
+          ],
+          [
+            544.76806640625,
+            286.23248291015625
+          ],
+          [
+            106.39499999999998,
+            286.23248291015625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "COUNT FOUR",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 12,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            264.45000000000005,
+            298.08
+          ],
+          [
+            350.19537353515625,
+            298.08
+          ],
+          [
+            350.19537353515625,
+            313.61248779296875
+          ],
+          [
+            264.45000000000005,
+            313.61248779296875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "(Cause of Action for Transport of Visual Depiction of Minor Engaging in Sexually Explicit \nConduct pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 in Violation of 18 U.S.C. & 2252(a)(11)",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 12,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            71.34,
+            312.65999999999997
+          ],
+          [
+            543.0450000000001,
+            312.65999999999997
+          ],
+          [
+            543.0450000000001,
+            342.11248779296875
+          ],
+          [
+            71.34,
+            342.11248779296875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "COUNT FIVE \n(Cause of Action for Transport of Child Pornography pursuant to 18 \u00a7 2255 \nin Violation of 18 U.S.C. & 2252A(a)(1))",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 13,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            108.85499999999999,
+            382.32
+          ],
+          [
+            541.6881103515625,
+            382.32
+          ],
+          [
+            541.6881103515625,
+            425.79998779296875
+          ],
+          [
+            108.85499999999999,
+            425.79998779296875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "COUNT SIX \n(Cause of Action for Entwine in a Child Exploitation Enterprise pursuant to 18 \nU.S.C. 2255 in Violation of 18 U.S.C. 4 2252A(2)1",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 14,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            117.465,
+            492.48
+          ],
+          [
+            534.5366821289062,
+            492.48
+          ],
+          [
+            534.5366821289062,
+            535.6124877929688
+          ],
+          [
+            117.465,
+            535.6124877929688
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CIVIL COVER SHEET",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 17,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            234.315,
+            46.17
+          ],
+          [
+            361.62,
+            46.17
+          ],
+          [
+            361.62,
+            57.50999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            234.315,
+            57.50999999999999
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "I. (a) PLAINTIFFS",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 17,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            38.129999999999995,
+            90.72
+          ],
+          [
+            124.845,
+            90.72
+          ],
+          [
+            124.845,
+            101.25
+          ],
+          [
+            38.129999999999995,
+            101.25
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 17,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            38.129999999999995,
+            231.66
+          ],
+          [
+            166.66500000000002,
+            231.66
+          ],
+          [
+            166.66500000000002,
+            242.18999999999997
+          ],
+          [
+            38.129999999999995,
+            242.18999999999997
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "III. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 17,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            288.435,
+            232.46999999999997
+          ],
+          [
+            484.005,
+            232.46999999999997
+          ],
+          [
+            484.005,
+            243.81
+          ],
+          [
+            288.435,
+            243.81
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "IV. NATURE OF SUIT",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 17,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            38.129999999999995,
+            320.76
+          ],
+          [
+            135.915,
+            320.76
+          ],
+          [
+            135.915,
+            331.28999999999996
+          ],
+          [
+            38.129999999999995,
+            331.28999999999996
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "V. ORIGIN",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 17,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            38.129999999999995,
+            562.14
+          ],
+          [
+            87.945,
+            562.14
+          ],
+          [
+            87.945,
+            572.67
+          ],
+          [
+            38.129999999999995,
+            572.67
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "VI. RELATED/RE-FILED CASE(S).",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 17,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            38.129999999999995,
+            602.64
+          ],
+          [
+            148.82999999999998,
+            602.64
+          ],
+          [
+            148.82999999999998,
+            621.27
+          ],
+          [
+            38.129999999999995,
+            621.27
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "VII. CAUSE OF ACTION",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 17,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            38.129999999999995,
+            652.0500000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            148.82999999999998,
+            652.0500000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            148.82999999999998,
+            662.5799999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            38.129999999999995,
+            662.5799999999999
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA \nWEST PALM BEACH DIVISION",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 18,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            208.485,
+            78.57000000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            408.3147888183594,
+            78.57000000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            408.3147888183594,
+            121.61248779296875
+          ],
+          [
+            208.485,
+            121.61248779296875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "ATTACHMENT TO CIVIL COVER SHEET",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 18,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            187.575,
+            135.27
+          ],
+          [
+            429.1345520019531,
+            135.27
+          ],
+          [
+            429.1345520019531,
+            150.49249267578125
+          ],
+          [
+            187.575,
+            150.49249267578125
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "VI. RELATED PENDING CASES",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 18,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            69.495,
+            177.39000000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            263.79705810546875,
+            177.39000000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            263.79705810546875,
+            192.86248779296875
+          ],
+          [
+            69.495,
+            192.86248779296875
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            66
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            33
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            11
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Picture",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            56
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            55
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            55
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            57
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            58
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            68
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            32
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 9,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            54
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 10,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            56
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 11,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            63
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 12,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            59
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            29
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 13,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            61
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 14,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            56
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 15,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            49
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 16,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            47
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            21
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            17
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 17,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            35
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            18
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "Table",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 18,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            37
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            19
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739126"
+  }
+}

marker2/court-doe-103-v-epstein/EFTA02739145/EFTA02739145.md

@@ -0,0 +1,104 @@
+U s/stoke/ 3/€00
+
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Sealed SOUTHERN DISTRICT OEFLORLDAr, CASE NO. 1 0 u 3 u
+
+![](_page_0_Picture_8.jpeg)
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## UNOPPOSED MOTION TO SEAL AND PROCEED ANONYMOUSLY AND INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW
+
+Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 103, by and through her undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rule 5.4 S.D.Fla.L.R., moves this Court to enter an Order wanting Plaint' ffpermission to file her identity under seal and to proceed in this action under the pseudonym "Jane Doe No. 103" and, as grounds, states as follows:
+
+- 1. As outlined in detail in the Complaint, Jane Doe No. 103 was sexually abused by Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, when she was under the age of 18. As a result of Defendant's sexual abuse, Plaintiff has in the past suffered, and will in the future suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological and/or psychiatric trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, confusion, embarrassment, loss of educational opportunities, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy, and other damages associated with Defendant's manipulating and leading her into a perverse and unhealthy way of life for a minor. Sealed
+
+- 3. Disclosure of Plaintiff's name would cause her much additional embarrassment, humiliation, and psychological trauma.
+- 4. The subject matter of the Complaint clearly contains highly sensitive and intimate information about Plaintiff.
+- 5. Plaintiff was an identified victim by the State Attorney's Office, the Federal Bureau Investigation and the United States Attorney's Office in their criminal investigations against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein.
+- 6. During the related criminal investigations, and up and to this point in time, Plaintiff's identity has been sealed, as all parties recognize the highly sensitive subject matter of the charges and the need to protect the privacy interest of Plaintiff's identity.
+- 7. In this civil action, Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, already knows Plaintiff's identity and will be privy to the sealed document containing Plaintiff's name. Therefore, he knows the identity of Plaintiff and will not be prejudiced by public non-disclosure of Jane Doe No. 103's identity.
+- 8. There is great need, in this case, to protect intimate information about Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 103, and to protect her privacy interest.
+
+## Memorandum of Law
+
+The general presumption against anonymous or pseudonymous pleadings, is commonly overcome in certain types of cases, and courts have discretion to permit such pleading in appropriate circumstances. "[P]rivacy or confidentiality concerns are sometimes sufficiently critical that parties or witnesses should be allowed this rare dispensation." James v. Jacobson, 6 F.3d 233, 238 (4th Cir. 1993). As is ordinarily the case where trial courts have discretion, judicial guidelines exist for the
+
+exercise of such discretion in the form of factors that courts should consider in deciding whether to grant anonymity requests. They are not many, for the question happily is one that is seldom raised. Nevertheless, some guidelines can be gleaned from the relatively few cases—both at the trial and appellate levels—that have wrestled with the problem. Among them are the following that have relevance to this case: whether the justification asserted by the requesting party is merely to avoid the annoyance and criticism that may attend any litigation or to preserve privacy in a matter of sensitive and highly personal nature; whether identification poses a risk of retaliatory physical or mental harm to the requesting party or, even more critically, to innocent non-parties; the ages of the persons whose privacy interests are sought to be protected; and, relatedly, the risk of unfairness to the opposing party from allowing an action against it to proceed anonymously. See id. (internal citations omitted).
+
+In deciding whether to permit pseudonymous pleadings, courts must balance "the plaintiff's right to privacy and security against the dual concerns of (1) public interest in identification of litigants and (2) harm to the defendant stemming from [suppression] of plaintiffs name." Doe v. M, 105 F. Supp. 2d 40, 44 (E.D.N.Y. 1999) (internal citation omitted). The ultimate test for permitting a plaintiff to proceed anonymously is whether the plaintiff has a substantial privacy right that outweighs the customary presumption of openness in judicial proceedings. See Doe v. Stegall, 653 F.2d 180, 185-86 (5th Cir., 1981). Courts typically accept pseudonym filing in cases where the nature of the pleading unveils highly sensitive information and detail about the plaintiff, such that the non-disclosure of the party's name is necessary to protect her from harassment, injury, ridicule, or personal embarrassment. See United States v. Doe, 655 F.2d 920, 922 n. I (9th Cir. 1981); sec
+
+also Doe v. 429 F.3d 706 (7th Cir. 2005) (court required to consider whether the interests of justice required adult woman, who was videotaped having consensual sex with her boyfriend when she was a minor, to disclose her name as plaintiff in lawsuit against boyfriend alleging that boyfriend illegally distributed videotape); Does I Thru XXIII v. Advanced Textile Corp., 214 F.3d 1058, 1067- 68 (9th Cir. 2000) (district court abused its discretion in denying permission to proceed anonymously to Chinese employees working in garment industry in Mariana Islands where employees were vulnerable to retaliation); Stegall, 653 F.2d at 185-86 (anonymity warranted to protect minor plaintiffs against risk of violence from revelation of unpopular personal beliefs); Doe v. United Sens. Life Ins. Co., 123 F.R.D. 437 (S.D.N.Y. 1988) (anonymity allowed because of sensitive privacy and retaliation concerns in suit by homosexual against insurance company alleging discriminatory practices; no unfairness to defendant, who was aware of claimant's identity); Candy IL v. Redemption Ranch. 563 F. Supp. 505 (M.D. Ala. 1983) (anonymity allowed in suit by pregnant 19-year-old alleging fraudulent inducement to enter defendant's Home for Girls).
+
+It is clear from the allegations of sexual abuse of a minor in the Complaint that the information is of a highly sensitive nature. Jane Doe No. 103's name remained anonymous in the related criminal cases, and Defendant's attorneys, the State Attorney's Office, as well as the United States government, redacted all documents containing her name. The present case is not one in which permitting Plaintiff's identity to be kept under seal and allowing her to proceed anonymously will disadvantage Defendant in any way. Defendant already knows Plaintiff's identity and will be privy to the sealed document containing Plaintiff's name. While the public normally has a right to the openness of judicial proceedings, the victim's privacy interest greatly outweighs the right to
+
+know the identity of a victim of child sex abuse. Other than the identity of Plaintiff, the aspects of this case will be available to the public. Evidently, the balance weighs overwhelmingly in favor sealing Plaintiff's identity and allowing Plaintiff to proceed anonymously.
+
+This Court recently has allowed at least 15 other plaintiffs who were underage sex abuse victims of Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, to proceed anonymously, including the following: See C.M.A, v. Epstein et at, Case No. 9:08-cv-80811-KAM; Jane Doe No. 1 v. Epstein, Case No. 9:08-cv-80069-KAM (Dismissed); Jane Doe No. 2 v. Epstein, Case No. 9:08-cv-80119-KAM; Jane Doe No. 3 v. Epstein, Case No. 9:08-cv-80232; Jane Doe No. 4 v. Epstein, Case No. 9:08-cv-80380-KAM; Jane Doe No. S v. Epstein, Case No. 9:08-cv-80381-KAM; Jane Doe No. 6 v. Epstein, Case No. 9:08-cv-80994-KAM; Jane Doe No. 7 v. Epstein, Case No. 9:08-cv-80993-KAM; Jane Doe v. Epstein, Case No. 9:08-cv-80893-KAM; Jane Doe v. Epstein et al., Case No. 9:08-cv-80804-KAM (Closed); Jane Doe 11 v. Epstein, Case No. 9:09-cv-80469-KAM; Jane Doe No. 101 v. Epstein, Case No. 9:09-cv-80591-KAM (Closed); Jane Doe No. 102 v. Epstein, Case No. 9:09-cv-80656-KAM (Closed); Jane Doe No. 8 vs. Epstein. Case No. 9:09-cv-80802-KAM; L.M. vs Epstein, Case No. 9:09-cv-81092-1CAM. Accordingly, this Court should likewise permit Jane Doe No. 103 to proceed anonymously.
+
+WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 103, moves this Court to enter an Order granting this
+
+Motion, thus allowing her identity to be filed under seal and permitting her to proceed in this litigation under the Jane Doe No. 103 pseudonym.
+
+Date: February 23, 2010
+
+Respectfully Submitted,
+
+PODHURST, ORSECIC, P.A.
+
+Attorneys for Plaintiff
+
+By: oRdicAS log
+
+Robert C. Josefsb Bar No. 040856
+
+Katherine W. Ezell, Bar No. 114771
+
+Podhurst Orseck, P.A.
+
+25 West Flagler Street, Suite 800
+
+Miami, Florida 33130
+
+(305) 358-2800
+
+(305) 358-2382 (fax)
+
+riosefsberethoodhurst.com
+
+kezellapodhurst.com
+
+## CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL RULE 7.1.A.3
+
+On Fcbruary 22nd and 23a, 2010 undersigned counsel conferred with counsel for Defendant in a good faith effort to resolve the issues raised in this motion. Defendant's counsel Robert C.
+
+Critton, responded that Defendant does not oppose the relief sought at this time but is not waiving his right to challenge the anonymous filing at a later date.
+
+Date: February 23, 2010.
+
+Respectfully Submitted,
+
+PODHURST, ORSECK, P.A.
+
+Attorneys for Plaintiff
+
+By:
+
+Robert C. Josefsberg, Bhf No. 04085
+
+Katherine W. Ezell, Bar No. 114771
+
+Podhurst Orseck, P.A.
+
+25 West Flagler Street, Suite 800
+
+Miami, Florida 33130
+
+(305) 358-2800
+
+(305) 358-2382 (fax)
+
+riosefsberedpodh u rst.com
+
+kezellailoodhurst.com

marker2/court-doe-103-v-epstein/EFTA02739145/EFTA02739145.metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,385 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-103-v-epstein/EFTA02739145.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 7,
+  "chars": 9610,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.49,
+  "image_assets": [
+    "_page_0_Picture_8.jpeg"
+  ],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Sealed \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OEFLORLDAr, \nCASE NO. 1 0 u 3 u",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            199.875,
+            71.52716064453125
+          ],
+          [
+            475.4386291503906,
+            71.52716064453125
+          ],
+          [
+            475.4386291503906,
+            135.669677734375
+          ],
+          [
+            199.875,
+            135.669677734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "UNOPPOSED MOTION TO SEAL AND PROCEED ANONYMOUSLY \nAND INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            115.005,
+            331.28999999999996
+          ],
+          [
+            494.5816345214844,
+            331.28999999999996
+          ],
+          [
+            494.5816345214844,
+            361.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            115.005,
+            361.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Memorandum of Law",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            247.84500000000003,
+            543.2988891601562
+          ],
+          [
+            366.27984619140625,
+            543.2988891601562
+          ],
+          [
+            366.27984619140625,
+            557.6835174560547
+          ],
+          [
+            247.84500000000003,
+            557.6835174560547
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL RULE 7.1.A.3",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            129.765,
+            514.3499999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            484.3154602050781,
+            514.3499999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            484.3154602050781,
+            530.9830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            129.765,
+            530.9830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            65
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Picture",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            54
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            62
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            46
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            23
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            54
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            17
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            43
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            22
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            16
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739145"
+  }
+}

marker2/court-doe-103-v-epstein/EFTA02739152/EFTA02739152.md

@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
+JANE DOE 103,
+
+v.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Case Number: 1 0 80 3 0.9
+
+Plaintiff
+
+Defendant
+
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
+
+Southern District of Florida
+
+## SUMMONS IN A CIVIL CASE
+
+TO: (Name and address of defendant)
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN, by serving his counsel:
+
+ROBERT D. CRITTON, ESQ.
+
+Burman, Critton, Luther 8 Coleman, LLP
+
+303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400
+
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+
+YOU ARE HEREBY SUMMONED and required to serve upon PLAINTIFF'S ATTORNEY (name and address)
+
+ROBERT C. JOSEFSBERG. ESQ. / KATHERINE W. EZELL
+
+PODHURST ORSECK, P.A.
+
+City National Bank Bldg.
+
+25 W. Flagler St., Suite 800
+
+Miami, FL 33130
+
+t
+
+an answer to the complaint which is herewith served upon you, within days after service of this summons upon you, exclusive of the day of service. If you fail to do so, judgment by default will be taken against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. You must also file your answer with the Clerk :if this Court within a reasonable period of time after service.
+
+Steven M. Larimore
+
+UNITED TATES DISTRICT COURT
+
+CLERK NV) DATE
+
+By: Put
+
+FEB 2 3 MO

marker2/court-doe-103-v-epstein/EFTA02739152/EFTA02739152.metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-103-v-epstein/EFTA02739152.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 1,
+  "chars": 1074,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.59,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            205.41,
+            70.72900390625
+          ],
+          [
+            406.1725158691406,
+            70.72900390625
+          ],
+          [
+            406.1725158691406,
+            89.368896484375
+          ],
+          [
+            205.41,
+            89.368896484375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "SUMMONS IN A CIVIL CASE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            231.24,
+            276.60906982421875
+          ],
+          [
+            381.7815856933594,
+            276.60906982421875
+          ],
+          [
+            381.7815856933594,
+            295.2488708496094
+          ],
+          [
+            231.24,
+            295.2488708496094
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            79
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            37
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            33
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739152"
+  }
+}

marker2/court-doe-103-v-epstein/EFTA02739153/EFTA02739153.md

@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+### U.S. District Court Southern District of Florida (West Palm Beach) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 9:10-cv-80309-WJZ Internal Use Only
+
+Sealed Plaintiff v. Sealed Defandant Assigned to: Judge William J. Zloch Referred to: Magistrate Judge Robin S. Rosenbaum Cause: 28:1391 Personal Injury
+
+#### Plaintiff
+
+# Scaled Plaintiff
+
+#### Defendant
+
+# Sealed Defandant
+
+Date Filed: 02/23/2010 Jury Demand: Plaintiff Nature of Suit: 360 P.I.: Other Jurisdiction: Federal Question
+
+| Date Filed | #   | Docket Text                                                           |
+|------------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| 02/23/2010 | 1   | Sealed Document (gme) (Entered: 02/23/2010)                           |
+| 02/23/2010 | 0 2 | Sealed Document (gme) (Entered: 02/23/2010)                           |
+| 02/23/2010 | 3   | Sealed Document (gme) (Entered: 02/23/2010)                           |
+| 02/23/2010 | 4   | Sealed Document (ebs) (Entered: 02/23/2010)                           |
+| 03/09/2010 | 5   | Order granting Plaintiff's Motion to Seal and Proceed Anonymously 2 . |
+| 03/09/2010 | 4 6 | Case Deleted : Case Unsealed (nc) (Entered: 03/09/2010)               |

marker2/court-doe-103-v-epstein/EFTA02739153/EFTA02739153.metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,182 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-103-v-epstein/EFTA02739153.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 1,
+  "chars": 1212,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 0.7,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "U.S. District Court \nSouthern District of Florida (West Palm Beach) \nCIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 9:10-cv-80309-WJZ \nInternal Use Only",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            150.552,
+            81.81
+          ],
+          [
+            461.5811462402344,
+            81.81
+          ],
+          [
+            461.5811462402344,
+            143.60302734375
+          ],
+          [
+            150.552,
+            143.60302734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Plaintiff",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            55.692,
+            235.70999999999998
+          ],
+          [
+            104.82965087890625,
+            235.70999999999998
+          ],
+          [
+            104.82965087890625,
+            250.18353271484375
+          ],
+          [
+            55.692,
+            250.18353271484375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Scaled Plaintiff",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            55.692,
+            253.53000000000003
+          ],
+          [
+            141.16778564453125,
+            253.53000000000003
+          ],
+          [
+            141.16778564453125,
+            269.30352783203125
+          ],
+          [
+            55.692,
+            269.30352783203125
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Defendant",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            55.692,
+            309.42
+          ],
+          [
+            114.98381805419922,
+            309.42
+          ],
+          [
+            114.98381805419922,
+            324.43353271484375
+          ],
+          [
+            55.692,
+            324.43353271484375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Sealed Defandant",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            55.692,
+            327.24
+          ],
+          [
+            151.3251953125,
+            327.24
+          ],
+          [
+            151.3251953125,
+            343.10302734375
+          ],
+          [
+            55.692,
+            343.10302734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            62
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            31
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "Table",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739153"
+  }
+}

marker2/court-doe-103-v-epstein/EFTA02739154/EFTA02739154.md

@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO. 10-80309-CIV-ZLOCH
+
+JANE DOE NO. 103,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs. ORDER
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+THIS MATTER is before the Court upon the Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 103's Unopposed Motion To Seal And Proceed Anonymously (DE 2). The Court has carefully considered the merits of said Motion and is otherwise fully advised in the premises.
+
+Accordingly, after due consideration, it is
+
+ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion To Seal And Proceed Anonymously (DE 2) be and the same is hereby GRANTED. It is further
+
+ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Clerk of Court be and the same is hereby DIRECTED to file and maintain under seal permanently Plaintiff's Identity (DE 3) and she shall be permitted to proceed anonymously as "Jane Doe No. 103" in the above-styled cause. It is further
+
+ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Clerk of Court be and the same is hereby DIRECTED to UNSEAL the Plaintiff's Complaint (DE 1), Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion To Seal (DE 2) and Summons (DE 4) and
+
+place same in the court file.
+
+DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida, this 9<sup>th</sup> day of March, 2010.
+
+![]()WILLIAM J. ZLOCH  
+United States District Judge
+
+Copies furnished:  
+All Counsel of Record

marker2/court-doe-103-v-epstein/EFTA02739154/EFTA02739154.metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,124 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-103-v-epstein/EFTA02739154.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 2,
+  "chars": 1292,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 2.49,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            192.495,
+            68.03999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            405.40008544921875,
+            68.03999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            405.40008544921875,
+            94.5931396484375
+          ],
+          [
+            192.495,
+            94.5931396484375
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            55
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "Caption",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739154"
+  }
+}

marker2/court-doe-103-v-epstein/EFTA02739156/EFTA02739156.md

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO. 10-80309-CIV-IvIarra/a
+
+JANE DOE No. 103,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFERY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## ORDER
+
+This matter came before the Court on Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S Motion for Extension of Time in Which to Serve a Responsive Pleading to Plaintiff, Jane Doe 103's Complaint. Having considered Defendant's Motion, it is HEREBY ORDERED and ADJUDGED that:
+
+Defendant's Unopposed Motion is GRANTED. Defendant shall file a Responsive Pleading to Plaintiff, Jane Doe 103's Complaint on or before April 5, 2010.
+
+DONE and ORDERED this day of , 2010.
+
+Kenneth A. Marra United States District Judge
+
+Courtesy Copies all counsel

marker2/court-doe-103-v-epstein/EFTA02739156/EFTA02739156.metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-103-v-epstein/EFTA02739156.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 1,
+  "chars": 689,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 0.76,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            208.692,
+            72.9
+          ],
+          [
+            410.0810241699219,
+            72.9
+          ],
+          [
+            410.0810241699219,
+            103.10302734375
+          ],
+          [
+            208.692,
+            103.10302734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "ORDER",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            285.804,
+            280.26
+          ],
+          [
+            335.2479248046875,
+            280.26
+          ],
+          [
+            335.2479248046875,
+            296.6029968261719
+          ],
+          [
+            285.804,
+            296.6029968261719
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            43
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            22
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739156"
+  }
+}

marker2/court-doe-103-v-epstein/EFTA02739157/EFTA02739157.md

@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO. 10-80309-CIV-Marra/M
+
+JANE DOE No. 103,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFERY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
+
+Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, (hereinafter "Epstein") by and through his undersigned attorneys, respectfully moves this Court for an extension of time in which to respond to Complaint dated, February 23, 2010. Defendant seeks an extension until April 5, 2010, to file his response. As good cause in support of granting the motion, Defendant states:
+
+- 1. On February 23, 2010 Plaintiff filed a Complaint [DE 1]. Defendant's response would be due on March 26, 2010.
+- 2. There are several other cases filed with this Court in which Jeffrey Epstein is named a Defendant. In those cases, the undersigned has been preparing responses and replies to various motions, and handling other matters associated therewith.
+- 3. The requested extension is fair in reasonable under the circumstances as it will provide time to allow the Defendant, EPSTEIN, to fully and adequately respond.
+- 4. As certified below, counsel for Defendant conferred with counsel for Plaintiff, and Plaintiff's counsel is in agreement with the requested extension.
+
+WHEREFORE Defendant respectfully requests that this Court enter an order granting an extension until April 5, 2010 to file a response to Plaintiff's Complaint.
+
+## Local Rule 7.1 Statement
+
+Counsel for the movant conferred by telephone and correspondence with counsel for the Plaintiff and Counsel for Plaintiff is in agreement with the requested extension until April 5, 2010 for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint.
+
+> /s/ Michael J. Pike Robert D. Critton, Attorney for Defendant Epstein
+
+## Certificate of Service
+
+I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record identified on the following Service List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on this 23rd day of March, 2010.
+
+Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Katherine W. Ezell, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 25 West Flagler Street, Suite 800 Miami, FL 33130 305 358-2800 Fax: 305 358-2382 !josefsbergQ1podhurst.com kezell@podhurst.com Counsel for Plaintiff
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 561-659-8300 Fax: 561-835-8691 jagesq(&,bellsouth.net Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+By: /s/ Michael J. Pike ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar No. 224162 rcrit@bc1claw.com
+
+MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ.
+
+Florida Bar #617296
+
+moike@hciclaw.com
+
+BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN
+
+515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400
+
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+
+561/842-2820 Phone
+
+561/515-3148 Fax
+
+(Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein)

marker2/court-doe-103-v-epstein/EFTA02739157/EFTA02739157.metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,212 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-103-v-epstein/EFTA02739157.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 3,
+  "chars": 2944,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 0.77,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            208.692,
+            73.71000000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            410.8181457519531,
+            73.71000000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            410.8181457519531,
+            103.85308837890625
+          ],
+          [
+            208.692,
+            103.85308837890625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Local Rule 7.1 Statement",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            246.63600000000002,
+            129.60000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            373.492919921875,
+            129.60000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            373.492919921875,
+            145.10302734375
+          ],
+          [
+            246.63600000000002,
+            145.10302734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Certificate of Service",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            271.728,
+            347.49
+          ],
+          [
+            387.46051025390625,
+            347.49
+          ],
+          [
+            387.46051025390625,
+            364.10302734375
+          ],
+          [
+            271.728,
+            364.10302734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            85
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            41
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            13
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            9
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739157"
+  }
+}

marker2/court-doe-103-v-epstein/EFTA02739160/EFTA02739160.md

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO. 10-80309-CIV-
+
+JANE DOE No. 103,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFERY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## ORDER
+
+This matter came before the Court on Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S Motion to Exceed Page Limitation on Responsive Pleading to Plaintiff, Jane Doe 103's Complaint. Having considered Defendant's Motion, it is HEREBY ORDERED and ADJUDGED that:
+
+Defendant's Unopposed Motion is GRANTED. Defendant may exceed the 20 page limitation in his Responsive Pleading to Plaintiff, Jane Doe 103's complaint by no more than eight (8) pages.
+
+DONE and ORDERED this day of , 2010.
+
+Kenneth A. Marra United States District Judge
+
+Courtesy Copies all counsel

marker2/court-doe-103-v-epstein/EFTA02739160/EFTA02739160.metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-103-v-epstein/EFTA02739160.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 1,
+  "chars": 700,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 0.77,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            209.304,
+            74.52
+          ],
+          [
+            411.57708740234375,
+            74.52
+          ],
+          [
+            411.57708740234375,
+            104.60302734375
+          ],
+          [
+            209.304,
+            104.60302734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "ORDER",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            286.41600000000005,
+            281.88
+          ],
+          [
+            337.1278991699219,
+            281.88
+          ],
+          [
+            337.1278991699219,
+            298.1029968261719
+          ],
+          [
+            286.41600000000005,
+            298.1029968261719
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            44
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            23
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            11
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739160"
+  }
+}

marker2/court-doe-103-v-epstein/EFTA02739161/EFTA02739161.md

@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO. 10-80309-CIV-Marra
+
+JANE DOE No. 103,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFERY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITATION ON MOTION TO DISMISS, & FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT & STRIKE DIRECTED TO PLAINTIFF JANE DOE NO. 103'S COMPLAINT Idated 2/23/20101
+
+Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, by and through his undersigned counsel, moves to exceed the page limitation of 20 pages imposed by Loc. Gen. Rule 7.1. C. 2. (S.D. Fla.), in his response to Plaintiff JANE DOE NO. 103's Complaint, dated February 23, 2010. In support of his motion, Defendant states:
+
+1. Local Gen. Rule 7.1 C. 2. provides in part that absent prior permission of the court, no party shall file any legal memorandum exceeding twenty pages in length. Defendant is in the process of preparing his response to Plaintiff's Complaint, (presently due on March 26, 2010, but Plaintiff has agreed to an extension until April 5, 2010), and the response will exceed the 20 page limitation. It is clear, based on the issues raised in Plaintiff's Complaint that in excess of 20 pages is required to fully and adequately respond to and discuss the issues raised. Defendant anticipates needing to exceed the page limitation for his legal memorandum by 6 to 8 pages.
+
+2. A length exceeding 20 pages is required so that Defendant may fully address the issues raised in Plaintiff's Complaint which attempts to assert six counts pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §2255. Under the constitutional guarantees of due process, including a fair and full opportunity to be heard, and in the interests of justice so that the Court may render a fully informed decision on the issue, Defendant is entitled to an order granting his motion to exceed the 20 page limitation in his response.
+
+3. As certified below herein, Plaintiff's counsel agreed to the request to exceed 20 pages.
+
+WHEREFORE, Defendant respectfully requests that this Court grant Defendant's motion, and enter an order allowing a response in excess of 20 pages.
+
+## Local Rule 7.1 Statement
+
+Counsel for the movant conferred with Counsel for the Plaintiff and Counsel for Plaintiff is in agreement with the requested filing in excess of twenty pages in Defendant's response to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint.
+
+> /s/ Michael J. Pike Robert D. Critton, Attorney for Defendant Epstein
+
+## Certificate of Service
+
+I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record identified on the following Service List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on this 23rd day of March, 2010.
+
+Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Katherine W. Ezell, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 25 West Flagler Street, Suite 800 Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400
+
+Miami, FL 33130 305 358-2800 Fax: 305 358-2382 rjosefsberg@podhurst.com kezell@podhurst.com Counsel for Plaintiff
+
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 561-659-8300 Fax: 561-835-8691 iagestp,bellsouth.net Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+By: /s/ Michael J. Pike ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar No. 224162 rcrit@bc1claw.com MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 mpike@bciclaw.com BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN 303 Banyan Blvd., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561/842-2820 Phone 561/515-3148 Fax (Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein)

marker2/court-doe-103-v-epstein/EFTA02739161/EFTA02739161.metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,227 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-103-v-epstein/EFTA02739161.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 3,
+  "chars": 3500,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 0.79,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            207.46800000000002,
+            75.33
+          ],
+          [
+            410.8310241699219,
+            75.33
+          ],
+          [
+            410.8310241699219,
+            104.9730224609375
+          ],
+          [
+            207.46800000000002,
+            104.9730224609375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE \nLIMITATION ON MOTION TO DISMISS, & FOR MORE \nDEFINITE STATEMENT & STRIKE DIRECTED TO PLAINTIFF \nJANE DOE NO. 103'S COMPLAINT Idated 2/23/20101",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            130.356,
+            281.07
+          ],
+          [
+            491.27984619140625,
+            281.07
+          ],
+          [
+            491.27984619140625,
+            339.7330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            130.356,
+            339.7330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Local Rule 7.1 Statement",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            241.74,
+            349.11
+          ],
+          [
+            377.87115478515625,
+            349.11
+          ],
+          [
+            377.87115478515625,
+            366.35302734375
+          ],
+          [
+            241.74,
+            366.35302734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Certificate of Service",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            271.728,
+            542.7
+          ],
+          [
+            386.30792236328125,
+            542.7
+          ],
+          [
+            386.30792236328125,
+            559.1030120849609
+          ],
+          [
+            271.728,
+            559.1030120849609
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            67
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            33
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            57
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            29
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739161"
+  }
+}

marker2/court-doe-103-v-epstein/EFTA02739164/EFTA02739164.md

@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION
+
+## ATTACHMENT TO CIVIL COVER SHEET FOR: Jane Doe 103 v. Jeffrey Epstein
+
+## VI. RELATED PENDING CASES
+
+08-80119 - KAM
+
+08-80232 - KAM
+
+08-80380 - KAM
+
+08-80381 - KAM
+
+08-80811 - KAM
+
+08-80893 - KAM
+
+08-80993 - KAM
+
+08-80994 - KAM
+
+09-804459 - KAM
+
+09-80802 - KAM
+
+09-81092 - KAM
+
+![](_page_0_Picture_15.jpeg)

marker2/court-doe-103-v-epstein/EFTA02739164/EFTA02739164.metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,138 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-103-v-epstein/EFTA02739164.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 1,
+  "chars": 395,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.04,
+  "image_assets": [
+    "_page_0_Picture_15.jpeg"
+  ],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA \nWEST PALM BEACH DIVISION",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            199.512,
+            63.17999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            398.5647888183594,
+            63.17999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            398.5647888183594,
+            108.11248779296875
+          ],
+          [
+            199.512,
+            108.11248779296875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "ATTACHMENT TO CIVIL COVER SHEET \nFOR: Jane Doe 103 v. Jeffrey Epstein",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            178.704,
+            119.88
+          ],
+          [
+            419.3528137207031,
+            119.88
+          ],
+          [
+            419.3528137207031,
+            150.86248779296875
+          ],
+          [
+            178.704,
+            150.86248779296875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "VI. RELATED PENDING CASES",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            61.2,
+            163.62
+          ],
+          [
+            254.41806030273438,
+            163.62
+          ],
+          [
+            254.41806030273438,
+            179.73248291015625
+          ],
+          [
+            61.2,
+            179.73248291015625
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            37
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            19
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            11
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Picture",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739164"
+  }
+}

marker2/court-doe-103-v-epstein/EFTA02739165/EFTA02739165.md

@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 10-80309
+
+JANE DOE NO. 103
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## ORDER
+
+THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion to Transfer. The Court being fully advised, it is hereby,
+
+ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that
+
+I. Plaintiff's Motion to Transfer is hereby GRANTED. The above-styled action shall be transferred to Judge Marra's Division where it can be consolidated with the pending multiple cases in the eleven similar actions, which have been consolidated under Doe No. 2 vs. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 08-80119-MARRAM=1.
+
+DONE AND ORDERED in at Miami, Florida this day of April, 2010.
+
+cc: All counsel of record
+
+UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

marker2/court-doe-103-v-epstein/EFTA02739165/EFTA02739165.metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-103-v-epstein/EFTA02739165.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 1,
+  "chars": 726,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 0.77,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            72.08999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            408.2953796386719,
+            72.08999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            408.2953796386719,
+            100.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            100.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "ORDER",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            281.52,
+            341.01
+          ],
+          [
+            330.7633361816406,
+            341.01
+          ],
+          [
+            330.7633361816406,
+            355.863037109375
+          ],
+          [
+            281.52,
+            355.863037109375
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            43
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            22
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739165"
+  }
+}

marker2/court-doe-103-v-epstein/EFTA02739166/EFTA02739166.md

@@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 10-80309
+
+JANE DOE NO. 103
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO TRANSFER
+
+Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 103, by and through her undersigned counsel, moves this Court for the entry of an order transferring this case to Judge Marra so that it may be consolidated with Jane Doe No. 2 vs. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 08-80119-MARRa, on the following grounds:
+
+- I. On February 23, 2010, Plaintiff filed Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial and attached a list of Related Pending Cases to the Civil Cover Sheet (Exhibit"A"). As was clearly indicated by the attachment this case is similar and related to at least II other cases that have been transferred to Judge Marra's division and consolidated.
+- 2. On May 14, 2009, Judge Marra entered an Order Consolidating Cases For Purposes of Discovery and Procedural Motions that Relate to Multiple Cases in Case No. 08-80119- MARRAil l [D.E. 98].
+  - 3. Transfer of this matter to Judge Marra and consolidation with the other pending Jane
+
+doe cases against Jeffrey Epstein will serve the interests of judicial economy and efficiency.
+
+WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 103, respectfully requests that this Court grant Plaintiff's motion, and enter an order transferring this case to Judge Marra's division where it can be consolidated with the numerous other similar and related cases pending before Judge Marra.
+
+DATED this 1st day of April, 2010.
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+PODHURST ORSECK, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 103
+
+By: s/Katherine W. Ezell Robert C. Josefsberg Fla. Bar No. 040856 riosefsberrapodhurst.com Katherine W. Ezell Fla. Bar No. 114771 kezell®podhurst.com City National Bank Building 25 W. Flagler Street, Suite 800 Miami, FL 33130 Telephone: (305) 358-2800 Facsimile: (305) 358-2382
+
+## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
+
+WE HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 1st day of April, 2010, a copy of the foregoing was served this day on all counsel of record on the attached Service List via e-mail transmission.
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+PODHURST ORSECK, P.A.
+
+Attorneys for PlaintiLlane Doe No. 103
+
+By: s/Katherine W. Ezel Robert C. Josefsberg Fla. Bar No. 040856 riosefsbergaipodhurst.com Katherine W. Ezell Fla. Bar No. 114771 kezell(apodhurst.com City National Bank Building 25 W. Flagler Street, Suite 800 Miami, FL 33130 Telephone: (305) 358-2800 Facsimile: (305) 358-2382
+
+## SERVICE LIST
+
+JANE DOE NO. 103 v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN Case No.: 10-80309 United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
+
+Robert Critton, Esq. Michael J. Pike, Esq. Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman LLP 303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561) 842-2820/Fax: (561) 515-3148 rcrit@bciclaw.com mpike®bciclaw.com Counsel for Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein
+
+Jack Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561) 659-8300/Fax: (561) 835-8691 iamescabellsouth.net Co-Counsel for Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein
+
+Bruce E. Reinhart, Esq. Bruce E. Reinhart, P.A. 250 South Australian Avenue, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561) 202-6360/Fax: (561) 828-0983 ecf@brucereinhartlaw.com Counsel for Co-Defendant,
+
+Jack Scarola, Esq. Jack P.M, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300/Fax: (561) 383-9456 isxOsearcylaw.com
+
+bh(searcylaw.com
+
+Counsel for Plaintiff in related Case No. 08-80811
+
+Adam Horowitz, Esq.
+
+Stuart Mermelstein, Esq.
+
+Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A.
+
+18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218
+
+Miami, FL 33160
+
+Phone: (305) 931-2200/Fax: (305) 931-0877
+
+ahorowitz®sexabuseattomey.com
+
+smermelstein(asexabuseattomey.com
+
+Counsel for Plaintiffs in Related Cases Nos. 08-80069, 08-80119,08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80993, 08-80994
+
+Spencer Todd Kuvin, Esq.
+
+Theodore Jon Leopold, Esq.
+
+Leopold Kuvin, P.A.
+
+2925 PGA Boulevard, Suite 200
+
+Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410
+
+Phone: (561) 515-1400/Fax: (561) 515-1401
+
+skuvinaJe000ldkuvin.com
+
+tle000ld(aleopoldkuvin.com
+
+Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-08804
+
+.rBrac , Esq.
+
+, Jaffe, Weissing,
+
+Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.
+
+425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
+
+Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
+
+Phone: (954) 524-2820/Fax: (954) 524-2822
+
+brad@pathtojustice.com
+
+Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-80893
+
+Isidro Manuel =I, Esq.
+
+Elkins & Boehringer
+
+224 Datum Avenue, Suite 900
+
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+
+Phone: (561) 832-8033/Fax: (561) 832-7137
+
+isidrogarciaQbellsouth.net
+
+Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-80469

marker2/court-doe-103-v-epstein/EFTA02739166/EFTA02739166.metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,307 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-103-v-epstein/EFTA02739166.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 5,
+  "chars": 4633,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.79,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            206.856,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            408.2953796386719,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            408.2953796386719,
+            100.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            206.856,
+            100.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO TRANSFER",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            194.61599999999999,
+            354.78000000000003
+          ],
+          [
+            418.113525390625,
+            354.78000000000003
+          ],
+          [
+            418.113525390625,
+            369.7330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            194.61599999999999,
+            369.7330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            223.38,
+            112.59
+          ],
+          [
+            388.8902587890625,
+            112.59
+          ],
+          [
+            388.8902587890625,
+            126.7330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            223.38,
+            126.7330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "SERVICE LIST",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            261.324,
+            111.78000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            351.515380859375,
+            111.78000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            351.515380859375,
+            126.7330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            261.324,
+            126.7330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            45
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            22
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            47
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            24
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            43
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            22
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            75
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            38
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            81
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            40
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            36
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739166"
+  }
+}

marker2/court-doe-103-v-epstein/EFTA02739171/EFTA02739171.md

@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO. 10-80309-CIV-Marre
+
+JANE DOE No. 103,
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFERY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## NOTICE OF AGREEMENT AS TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REASSIGN CASE/MOTION TO TRANSFER (DE 12)
+
+Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, (hereinafter "EPSTEIN") by and through his undersigned attorneys, hereby files his Notice of Agreement as to Plaintiff's Motion to Reassign Case/Motion to Transfer filed on April 1, 2010:
+
+- 1. On April 1, 2010, Plaintiff filed her Motion to Reassign Case/Motion to Transfer (DE 12).
+- I. On May 14, 2010, Judge Marra entered an Order Consolidating Cases for Purposes of Discovery and Procedural Motion that Relate to Multiple Cases in Case No. 08-8011-Civ-Marra (DE 98)
+  - 2. Defendant Epstein is in agreement with Plaintiff's Motion to Transfer.
+
+/s/ Michael J. Pike Robert D. Critton, Attorney for Defendant Epstein
+
+**Certificate of Service**
+
+I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record identified on the following Service List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on this 2<sup>nd</sup> day of April, 2010.
+
+Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq.  
+Katherine W. Ezell, Esq.  
+Podhurst Orseck, P.A.  
+25 West Flagler Street, Suite 800  
+Miami, FL 33130  
+305 358-2800  
+Fax: 305 358-2382  
+[rjosefsberg@podhurst.com](mailto:rjosefsberg@podhurst.com)  
+[kezell@podhurst.com](mailto:kezell@podhurst.com)  
+*Counsel for Plaintiff*
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq.  
+Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.  
+250 Australian Avenue South  
+Suite 1400  
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012  
+561-659-8300  
+Fax: 561-835-8691  
+[jagesq@bellsouth.net](mailto:jagesq@bellsouth.net)  
+*Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein*
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+By: /s/ Michael J. Pike  
+ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ.  
+Florida Bar No. 224162  
+[rcrit@bclclaw.com](mailto:rcrit@bclclaw.com)  
+MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ.  
+Florida Bar #617296  
+[mpike@bclclaw.com](mailto:mpike@bclclaw.com)  
+BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER &  
+COLEMAN  
+303 Banyan Blvd., Suite 400  
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401  
+561/842-2820 Phone  
+561/515-3148 Fax  
+*(Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein)*

marker2/court-doe-103-v-epstein/EFTA02739171/EFTA02739171.metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,170 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-103-v-epstein/EFTA02739171.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 2,
+  "chars": 2263,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 5.35,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            207.46800000000002,
+            84.24
+          ],
+          [
+            405.529541015625,
+            84.24
+          ],
+          [
+            405.529541015625,
+            111.78000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            207.46800000000002,
+            111.78000000000002
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "NOTICE OF AGREEMENT AS TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO \nREASSIGN CASE/MOTION TO TRANSFER (DE 12)",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            136.476,
+            290.78999999999996
+          ],
+          [
+            481.9753112792969,
+            290.78999999999996
+          ],
+          [
+            481.9753112792969,
+            319.95000000000005
+          ],
+          [
+            136.476,
+            319.95000000000005
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Certificate of Service",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            267.44399999999996,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            380.052,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            380.052,
+            99.63
+          ],
+          [
+            267.44399999999996,
+            99.63
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            174
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739171"
+  }
+}

marker2/court-doe-103-v-epstein/EFTA02739173/EFTA02739173.md

@@ -0,0 +1,177 @@
+# UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO. 10-80309-CIV-
+
+JANE DOE No. 103,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFERY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+### DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO D1SMISS,COUNT VI & FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT & TO STRIKE DIRECTED TO PLAINTIFF JANE DOE NO. 103'S COMPLAINT !dated 2/23/20101
+
+Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, ("EPSTEIN"), by and through his undersigned counsel, moves to dismiss Count Six of Plaintiff JANE DOE 103's Complaint for failure to state a cause of action, as specified herein. Rule 12(b)(6), Fed.R.Civ.P. (2009); Local Gen. Rule 7.1 (S.D. Fla. 2009). Defendant further moves for More Definite Statement and to Strike. Rule 12(e) and (f), In support of his motion, Defendant states:
+
+The Complaint attempts to allege 6 counts, all of which are purportedly brought pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §2255 — Civil Remedies for Personal Injuries. Count Six is subject to dismissal because the predicate act relied upon by Plaintiff for her claims did not come into effect until July 27, 2006, well after the conduct alleged by Plaintiff occurred. The More Definite Statement requested is for Plaintiff to allege her date of birth in that her being a minor has significance in the claims she alleges.
+
+### Supporting Memorandum of Law
+
+### Principles of Statutory Interpretation
+
+It is well settled that in interpreting a statute, the court's inquiry begins with the plain and unambiguous language of the statutory text. CBS, Inc. v. Prime Time 24 Venture, 245 F.3d 1217 (11th Cir. 2001); U.S. v. Castroneves 2009 WL 528251, \*3 (S.D. Fla. 2009), citing Reeves v. Astrue, 526 F.3d 732, 734 (11th Cir. 2008); and V. Husband, 376 F.Supp.2d at 610 ("When interpreting a statute, [a court's] inquiry begins with the text."). "The Court must first look to the plain meaning of the words, and scrutinize the statute's `language, structure, and purpose.' Id. In addition, in construing a statute, a court is to presume that the legislature said what it means and means what it said, and not add language or give some absurd or strained interpretation. As stated in CBS. Inc. supra at 1228 — "Those who ask courts to give effect to perceived legislative intent by interpreting statutory language contrary to its plain and unambiguous meaning are in effect asking courts to alter that language, and IcJourts have no authority to alter statutory language.... We cannot add to the terms of [the] provision what Congress left out.' Merritt, 120 F.3d at 1187." See also Dodd v. U.S., 125 S.Ct. 2478 (2005); 73 Am.Jur.2d Statutes §124 .
+
+Title 18 of the U.S.C. is entitled "Crimes and Criminal Procedure." §2255 is contained in "Pan I. Crimes, Chap. 110. Sexual Exploitation and Other Abuse of Children." 18 U.S.C. §2255 (2002), is entitled Civil remedy for personal injuries, and provides:
+
+- (a) Any minor who is a victim of a violation of section 2241(c), 2242, 2243, 2251, 2251A, 2252, 2252A, 2260, 2421, 2422, or 2423 of this title and who suffers
+
+The above quoted version of 18 U.S.C. §2255 was the same beginning in 1999 until amended in 2006, effective July 27, 2006.
+
+personal injury as a result of such violation may sue in any appropriate United States District Court and shall recover the actual damages such minor sustains and the cost of the suit, including a reasonable attorneys fee. Any minor as described in the preceding sentence shall be deemed to have sustained damages of no less than \$50,000 in value.
+
+- (b) Any action commenced under this section shall be barred unless the complaint is filed within six years after the right of action first accrues or in the case of a person under a legal disability, not later than three years after the disability.
+
+See endnote 1 hereto for statutory text as amended in 2006, effective July 27, 2006. Prior to the 2006 amendments, the version of the statute quoted above was in effect beginning in 1999.1
+
+All of Plaintiff's allegations of abuse occurred between January 2004 and May 2005 (par. 18), well prior to 18 U.S.C. §2255 being amended.
+
+## Motion to Dismiss
+
+Plaintiff's reliance on the amended version of 18 U.S.C. 42255, such reliance is improper. The version of Defendant's position that 18 U.S.C. §2255 in effect prior to the 2006 amendments applies to this action, and therefore Count Six is required to be dismissed as it relies on a predicate act that was not in effect at the time of the alleged conduct.23
+
+Plaintiff does not specifically allege in her Complaint on which version of 18 U.S.C. §2255 she is relying. However, in Count Six of her Complaint, ¶50, she alleges that Defendant "knowingly engaged in a child exploitation enterprise, as defined in 18 U.S.C. §2252A(g)(2), in violation of 18 U.S.C. §2252A(g)(1)." §2252A is one of the specified predicate acts under 18 U.S.C. §2255. However, subsection (g) of §2252 was
+
+<sup>2</sup> Points (2) and (3) are addressed together as the legal arguments overlap.
+
+In other §2255 actions filed against Defendant, Defendant has previously asserted the position that 18 U.S.C. §2255's creates a single cause of action on behalf of a plaintiff against a defendant, as opposed to multiple causes of action on a per violation basis or as opposed to an allowance of a multiplication of the statutory presumptive minimum damages or "actual damages." EPSTEIN asserts his position regarding the single recovery of damages in order to properly preserve all issues pertaining to the proper application of §2255 for appeal. EPSTEIN will fully honor his obligations as set forth in the Non-Prosecution Agreement with the United States Attorney's Office; principally, as related to the claims made in this case by Jane Doe 103, the obligations as set forth in paragraph 8 of that Agreement. In particular, EPSTEIN will not contest the allegation that he committed at least one predicate offense as alleged by Jane Doe 103.
+
+not added to the statute until 2006. Thus, to the extent that Plaintiff is relying on the amended version of 18 U.S.C. §2255, such reliance is improper and Count Six is required to be dismissed as it relies on a statutory predicate act that did not exist at the time of the alleged conduct.
+
+The statute in effect during the time the alleged conduct occurred is 18 U.S.C. §2255 (2005) — the version in effect prior to the 2006 amendment, eff. Jul. 27, 2006, (quoted above), and having an effective date of 1999 through July 26, 2006. See endnote 1 hereto. Plaintiff's Complaint alleges that Defendant's conduct occurred during the time period from the age of 17, January 2004 until approximately May 2005. Complaint, ¶¶17, 18. Thus, the version in effect in 2004-2005 of 18 U.S.C. §2255 applies.
+
+It is an axiom of law that "retroactivity is not favored in the ►aw." **Bowen 488 U.S., at 208, 109 S.Ct., at 471 (1988). As eloquently stated in Landgraf v. USI Film Products, 114 S.Ct. 1483, 1497, 511 U.S. 244, 265-66 (1994):** 
+
+**... the presumption against retroactive legislation is deeply rooted in our jurisprudence, and embodies a legal doctrine centuries older than our Republic. Elementary considerations of fairness dictate that individuals should have an opportunity to know what the law is and to conform their conduct accordingly; settled expectations should not be lightly disrupted Flats For that reason, the "principle that the legal effect of conduct should ordinarily be assessed under the law that existed when the conduct took place has timeless and universal appeal."** Kaiser, 494 U.S., at 855, 110 S.Ct., at 1586 (SCALIA, J., concurring). In a free, dynamic society, creativity in both commercial and artistic endeavors is fostered by a rule of law that gives people confidence about the legal consequences of their actions.
+
+FN18. See General Motors Corp. v. Romein, 503 U.S. 181, 191, 112 S.Ct. 1105, 1112, 117 L.Ed.2d 328 (1992) ("Retroactive legislation presents problems of unfairness that are more serious than those posed by prospective legislation, because it can deprive citizens of legitimate expectations and upset settled transactions"); [Further citations omitted].
+
+It is therefore not surprising that the antiretroactivity principle finds expression in several provisions of our Constitution. The Ex Post Facto Clause flatly prohibits retroactive application of penal legislation?" Article I, § 10, cl. 1, prohibits States
+
+from passing another type of retroactive legislation, laws “impairing the Obligation of Contracts.” The Fifth Amendment’s Takings Clause prevents the Legislature (and other government actors) from depriving private persons of vested property rights except for a “public use” and upon payment of “just compensation.” The prohibitions on “Bills of Attainder” in Art. I, §§ 9-10, prohibit legislatures from singling out disfavored persons and meting out summary punishment for past conduct. See, e.g., *United States v. [REDACTED]*, 381 U.S. 437, 456-462, 85 S.Ct. 1707, 1719-1722, 14 L.Ed.2d 484 (1965). The Due Process Clause also protects the interests in fair notice and repose that may be compromised by retroactive legislation; a justification sufficient to validate a statute’s prospective application under the Clause “may not suffice” to warrant its retroactive application. *Usery v. Turner Elkhorn Mining Co.*, 428 U.S. 1, 17, 96 S.Ct. 2882, 2893, 49 L.Ed.2d 752 (1976).
+
+FN19. Article I contains two *Ex Post Facto* Clauses, one directed to Congress (§ 9, cl. 3), the other to the States (§ 10, cl. 1). We have construed the Clauses as applicable only to penal legislation. See *Calder v. Bull*, 3 Dall. 386, 390-391, 1 L.Ed. 648 (1798) (opinion of Chase, J.).
+
+These provisions demonstrate that retroactive statutes raise particular concerns. The Legislature’s unmatched powers allow it to sweep away settled expectations suddenly and without individualized consideration. Its responsivity to political pressures poses a risk that it may be tempted to use retroactive legislation as a means of retribution against unpopular groups or individuals. As Justice Marshall observed in his opinion for \*\*1498 the Court in *Weaver v. Graham*, 450 U.S. 24, 101 S.Ct. 960, 67 L.Ed.2d 17 (1981), the *Ex Post Facto* Clause not only ensures that individuals have “fair warning” about the effect of criminal statutes, but also “restricts governmental power by restraining arbitrary and potentially vindictive legislation.” *Id.*, at 28-29, 101 S.Ct., at 963-964 (citations omitted).<sup>FN20</sup>
+
+FN20. See *Richmond v. J. A. Croson Co.*, 488 U.S. 469, 513-514, 109 S.Ct. 706, 732, 102 L.Ed.2d 854 (1989) (“Legislatures are primarily policymaking bodies that promulgate rules to govern future conduct. The constitutional prohibitions against the enactment of *ex post facto* laws and bills of attainder reflect a valid concern about the use of the political process to punish or characterize past conduct of private citizens. It is the judicial system, rather than the legislative process, that is best equipped to identify past wrongdoers and to fashion remedies that will create the conditions that presumably would have existed had no wrong been committed”) (STEVENS, J., concurring in part and concurring in judgment); *James v. United States*, 366 U.S. 213, 247, n. 3, 81 S.Ct. 1052, 1052, n. 3, 6 L.Ed.2d 246 (1961) (retroactive punitive measures may reflect “a purpose not to prevent dangerous conduct generally but to impose by legislation a penalty against specific persons or classes of persons”).
+
+These well entrenched constitutional protections and presumptions against retroactive application of legislation establish that 18 U.S.C. §2255 (2005) in effect at the time of the alleged conduct applies to the instant action, and not the amended version.
+
+Not only is there no clear express intent stating that the statute is to apply retroactively, but applying the current version of the statute, as amended in 2006, would be in clear violation of the Ex Post Facto Clause of the United States Constitution as it would be applied to events occurring before its enactment and would increase the penalty or punishment for the alleged crime. U.S. Const. Art. 1, §9, cl. 3, §10, cl. I. U.S. v. Seigel, 153 F.3d 1256 (11th Cir. 1998); U.S. v. 162 F.3d 87 (3d Cir. 1998); and generally, Calder v. Bull, 3 U.S. 386, 390, 1 L.Ed. 648, 1798 WL 587 (Calder) (1798).
+
+The United States Constitution provides that "inJo Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed" by Congress. U.S. Const. art. I, § 9, cl. 3. A law violates the Ex Post Facto Clause if it " lappli[es] to events occurring before its enactment ... [and] disadvantage[s] the offender affected by it' by altering the definition of criminal conduct or increasing the punishment for the crime." Lynce v. Mathis 519 U.S. 433, 117 S.Ct. 891, 137 L.Ed.2d 63 (1997) (quoting Weaver v. Graham 450 U.S. 24, 29, 101 S.Ct. 960, 67 L.Ed.2d 17 (1981)).
+
+U.S. v. Siegel,153 F.3d 1256, 1259 (11th Cir. 1998).
+
+The statute, as amended in 2006, contains no language stating that the application is to be retroactive. Thus, there is no manifest intent that the statute is to apply retroactively, and, accordingly, the statute in effect during the time of the alleged conduct is to apply. Landgraf v. USI Film Products, supra, at 1493, ("A statement that a statute will become effective on a certain date does not even arguably suggest that it has any application to conduct that occurred at an earlier date.").
+
+This statute was enacted as part of the Federal Criminal Statutes targeting sexual predators and sex crimes against children. H.R. 3494, "Child Protection and Sexual Predator Punishment Act of 1998;" House Report No. 105-557, 11, 1998 U.S.C.A.N. 678, 679 (1998). Quoting from the "Background and Need For Legislation" portion of the House Report No. 105-557, 11-16, H.R. 3494, of which 18 U.S.C. §2255 is included, is described as "the most comprehensive package of new crimes and increased penalties ever developed in response to crimes against children, particularly assaults facilitated by computers." Further showing that §2255 was enacted as a criminal penalty or punishment, "Title II — Punishing Sexual Predators," Sec. 206, from House Report No. 105-557, 5-6, specifically includes reference to the remedy created under §2255 as an additional means of punishing sexual predators, along with other penalties and punishments. Senatorial Comments in amending §2255 in 2006 confirm that the creation of the presumptive minimum damage amount is meant as an additional penalty against those who sexually exploit or abuse children. 2006 WL 2034118, 152 Cong. Rec. S8012- 02. Senator Kerry refers to the statutorily imposed damage amount as "penalties." Id.
+
+The cases of U.S. v. Siegel, supra (11'^ Cir. 1998), and U.S. v. M, supra (3d Cir. 1998), also support Defendant's position that application of the current version of 18 U.S.C. §2255 would be in clear violation of the Ex Post Facto Clause. In Siegel, the Eleventh Circuit found that the Ex Post Facto Clause barred application of the Mandatory Victim Restitution Act of 1996 (MVRA) to the defendant whose criminal conduct occurred before the effective date of the statute, 18 U.S.C. §3664(f)(1)(A), even though the guilty plea and sentencing proceeding occurred after the effective date of the statute. On July 19, 1996, the defendant Siegel pleaded guilty to various charges under 18 U.S.C. §371 and §1956(a)(1)(A), (conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud, bank fraud, and laundering of money instruments; and money laundering). He was sentenced on March 7, 1997. As part of his sentence, Siegel was ordered to pay \$1,207,000.00 in restitution under the MVRA which became effective on April 24, 1996. Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214, 1229-1236. The 1996 amendments to MVRA required that the district court must order restitution in the full amount of the victim's loss without consideration of the defendant's ability to pay. Prior to the enactment of the MVRA and under the former 18 U.S.C. §3664(a) of the Victim and Witness Protection Act of 1982 (VWPA), Pub.l. No. 97-291, 96 Stat. 1248, the court was required to consider, among other factors, the defendant's ability to pay in determining the amount of restitution.
+
+When the MVRA was enacted in 1996, Congress stated that the amendments to the VWPA "shall, to the extent constitutionally permissible, be effective for sentencing proceedings in cases in which the defendant is convicted on or after the date of enactment of this Act [Apr. 24, 1996)." Siegel supra at 1258. The alleged crimes occurred between February, 1988 to May, 1990. The Court agreed with the defendant's position that 19% MVRA "should not be applied in reviewing the validity of the court's restitution order because to do so would violate the Ex Post Facto Clause of the United States Constitution. See U.S. Const. art I, §9, cl. 3."
+
+The Ex Post Facto analysis made by the Eleventh Circuit in Siegel is applicable to this action. In resolving the issue in favor of the defendant, the Court first considered whether a restitution order is a punishment. Id, at 1259. In determining that restitution was a punishment, the Court noted that §3663A(a)(1) of Title 18 expressly describes restitution as a "penalty." In addition, the Court also noted that "[a]lthough not in the context of an ex post facto determination, ... restitution is a 'criminal penalty meant to have strong deterrent and rehabilitative effect.' United States v. Twittv 107 F.3d 1482, 1493 n. 12 (11th Cir.1997)." Second, the Court considered "whether the imposition of restitution under the MVRA is an increased penalty as prohibited by the Ex Post Facto Clause." Id, at 1259. In determining that the application of the 1996 MVRA would
+
+indeed run afoul of the Constitution's Ex Post Facto Clause, the Court agreed with the majority of the Circuits that restitution under the 1996 MVRA was an increased penalty.4
+
+"The effect of the MVRA can be detrimental to a defendant. Previously, after considering the defendant's financial condition, the court had the discretion to order restitution in an amount less than the loss sustained by the victim. Under the MVRA, however, the court must order restitution to each victim in the full amount." Id, at 1260. See also U.S. v. M, 162 F.2d 87 (3rd Circuit 1998).
+
+As discussed above, 18 U.S.C. §2255 was enacted as part of the criminal statutory scheme to punish and penalize those who sexually exploit and abuse minors, and thus, the Ex Post Fact Clause prohibits a retroactive application of the 2006 amended version.
+
+Notwithstanding the above legal analysis, in the recent case of Individual Known to Defendant As 08MIST096.JPG and 08mist067.ipg v. Falso, 2009 WL 4807537 (N.D. N.Y. Dec. 9, 2009), United States District Court for the Northern District of New York addressed the issue of whether §2255 is a civil or criminal statute for purposes of the constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy. The New York Court stated that "looking to the plain language of §2255(a), it is clear that the statutory intent was to provide a civil remedy. This is exemplified by the title ... and the fact that the statute aims to provide compensation to individuals who suffered personal injury as a result of criminal conduct against them." The New York Court in analyzing whether §2255 violated the Constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy, concluded that although
+
+The Eleventh Circuit, in holding that "the MVRA cannot be applied to a person whose criminal conduct occurred prior to April 24, 1996," was "persuaded by the majority of districts on this issue." "Restitution is a criminal penalty carrying with it characteristics of criminal punishment." Simi, supra at 1260. The Eleventh Circuit is in agreement with the Second, Third, Eighth, Ninth, and D.C. Circuits. See U.S. v. Futrell, 209 F.3d 1286, 1289-90 (11th Cir. 2000).
+
+the behavior to which §2255 is criminal, it did not find that the "primary aim" was "retribution and deterrence." "The statute serves civil goals." The "primary aim" is "the compensation for personal injuries sustained as a result of criminal conduct."
+
+Therefore, because Jane Doe 103 has invoked the provisions of the criminal Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) between EPSTEIN and USAO (see paragraphs 25 and 26 of complaint), plaintiff cannot avoid the full protection of the rule of lenity and due process to which EPSTEIN is entitled in the context of these unique factual circumstances.
+
+Although there does not exist any definitive ruling of whether the damages awarded under §2255 are meant as criminal punishment or a civil damages award, Defendant is still entitled to a determination as a matter of law that the statute in effect at the time of the alleged criminal conduct applies.
+
+As explained by the Landgraf court, supra at 280, and at 1505,5
+
+When a case implicates a federal statute enacted after the events in suit, the court's first task is to determine whether Congress has expressly prescribed the statute's proper reach. ►f **Congress has done so, of course, there is no need to resort to judicial default rules. When, however, the statute contains no such express command, the court must determine whether the new statute would have retroactive effect, i.e., whether it would impair rights a party possessed when he acted, increase a party's liability for past conduct, or impose new duties with respect to transactions already completed. If the statute would operate retroactively, our traditional presumption teaches that it does not govern absent clear congressional intent favoring such a result.** 
+
+**Here, there is no clear expression of intent regarding the 2006 Act's application to conduct occurring well before its enactment. See discussion of House Bill Reports and Congressional background above herein.** 
+
+**<sup>5</sup> In Landgraf, the United States Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the Court of Appeals and refused to apply new provisions of the Civil Rights Act of 1991 to conduct occurring before the effective date of the Act. The Court determined that statutory text in question, §102, was subject to the presumption against statutory retroactivity.** 
+
+As stated in Landgraf, "the extent of a party's liability, in the civil context as well as the criminal, is an important legal consequence that cannot be ignored." Courts have consistently refused to apply a statute which substantially increases a party's liability to conduct occurring before the statute's enactment. Landgraf, supra at 284-85. Even if plaintiff were to argue that retroactive application of the new statute "would vindicate its purpose more fully," even that consideration is not enough to rebut the presumption against retroactivity. Id, at 285-86. "The presumption against statutory retroactivity is founded upon sound considerations of general policy and practice, and accords with long held and widely shared expectations about the usual operation of legislation." Id.
+
+Thus, Count Six should be dismissed.
+
+# Motion For More Definite Statement and To Strike, Rule 12(e) and (0, F.R.C.P.
+
+As noted above, Plaintiff alleges that she was 17 year old high school student as of January, 2004, and that the alleged conduct involving EPSTEIN occurred "between approximately January 2004 and May 2005. Thus, Plaintiff had to be 18 (no longer a minor) by January of 2005. Under the principles of statutory construction, the language of §2255(a) is clear — "Any minor who is a victim of a violation of section ...of this title and who suffers personal injury as a result of such violation may sue in any appropriate United States District Court and shall recover the actual damages such minor sustains and the cost of the suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee. Any minor as described in the preceding sentence shall be deemed to have sustained damages of no less than \$50,000 in value."
+
+As Plaintiff's date of birth is significant to her §2255 claim, she should be required to more definitely state her date of birth so that Defendant and this Court are
+
+able to determine precisely when she reached the age of majority. (The age of majority under both federal and state law is 18 years old. See 18 U.S.C. §2256(1), defining a "minor" as "any person under the age of eighteen years;" and §1.01, Definitions, Fla. Stat., defining "minor" to include "any person who has not attained the age of 18 years.")
+
+To the extent that Plaintiff is relying on any alleged conduct that occurred after her 18 birthday as an element of her §2255 claim, such allegations should be stricken as immaterial and she should be required to more definitely state the dates of the alleged conduct. See Rule 12(0. Defendant also seeks to strike ¶¶10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16, of Plaintiff's Complaint as immaterial and impertinent. None of the allegations in those paragraphs specifically pertain to the Plaintiff. Not until ¶17 does Plaintiff assert allegations pertaining to her and the conduct of Defendant directly involving her. What EPSTEIN may or may not have allegedly done with respect to other alleged girls does not effect Plaintiff's claim brought pursuant to §2255. The allegations in ¶¶10-16 are not related to the elements of Plaintiff's §2255 claim and, thus, are required to be stricken.
+
+## Conclusion
+
+Pursuant to the above, Count Six is required to be dismissed. In addition, Plaintiff should be required to more definitely state her date of birth, and any conduct occurring after her 18th birthday should be stricken, and ¶¶10 - 16 of the Complaint should also be stricken.
+
+WHEREFORE, Defendant requests that this Cou • ismiss Count Six against him, and further grant his Motion for More Definite Stat trike.
+
+Robe itt r , Esq. Attorney for Defendant
+
+# Certificate of Service
+
+I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the for with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify being served this day on all counsel of recd identified the manner specified by CM/ECF on this 5 day of oing was electronically filed foregoing document is lowing Service List in , 2010.
+
+Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Katherine W. Ezell, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 25 West Flagler Street, Suite 800 Miami, FL 33130 305 358-2800 Fax: 305 358-2382 rjosefsberg@podhurst.com kezell@podhurst.com Counsel for Plaintiff
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 561-659-8300 Fax: 561-835-8691 jagesq@bellsouth.net Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
+
+Respectfully d,
+
+By: ROBER ON, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar No. 22 •2 rcrit@bc1claw.com MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 moike bcIclaw.com BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTHER & COLEMAN 515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561/842-2820 Phone 561/515-3148 Fax (Counsel for Defendant Jeffiey Epstein)
+
+<sup>1</sup> **18 USCA §2255 (1999-July 26, 2006):**
+
+**PART I--CRIMES**
+
+**CHAPTER 110--SEXUAL EXPLOITATION AND OTHER ABUSE OF CHILDREN**
+
+§ 2255. Civil remedy for personal injuries
+
+(a) Any minor who is a victim of a violation of section 2241(c), 2242, 2243, 2251, 2251A, 2252, 2252A, 2260, 2421, 2422, or 2423 of this title and who suffers personal injury as a result of such violation may sue in any appropriate United States District Court and shall recover the actual damages such minor sustains and the cost of the suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee. Any minor as described in the preceding sentence shall be deemed to have sustained damages of no less than \$50,000 in value.
+
+(b) Any action commenced under this section shall be barred unless the complaint is filed within six years after the right of action first accrues or in the case of a person under a legal disability, not later than three years after the disability.
+
+**CREDIT(S)**
+
+(Added Pub.L. 99-500, Title I, § 101(b) [Title VII, § 703(a)], Oct. 18, 1986, 100 Stat. 1783-75, and amended Pub.L. 99-591, Title I, § 101(b) [Title VII, § 703(a)], Oct. 30, 1986, 100 Stat. 3341-75; Pub.L. 105-314, Title VI, § 605, Oct. 30, 1998, 112 Stat. 2984.)
+
+**18 U.S.C. §2255, as amended 2006, Effective July 27, 2006:**
+
+**PART I--CRIMES**
+
+**CHAPTER 110--SEXUAL EXPLOITATION AND OTHER ABUSE OF CHILDREN**
+
+§ 2255. Civil remedy for personal injuries
+
+(a) **In general.**--Any person who, while a minor, was a victim of a violation of section 2241(c), 2242, 2243, 2251, 2251A, 2252, 2252A, 2260, 2421, 2422, or 2423 of this title and who suffers personal injury as a result of such violation, regardless of whether the injury occurred while such person was a minor, may sue in any appropriate United States District Court and shall recover the actual damages such person sustains and the cost of the suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee. Any person as described in the preceding sentence shall be deemed to have sustained damages of no less than \$150,000 in value.
+
+(b) Statute of limitations.--Any action commenced under this section shall be barred unless the complaint is filed within six years after the right of action first accrues or in the case of a person under a legal disability, not later than three years after the disability.
+
+## CREDIT(S)
+
+(Added Pub.L. 99-500, Title I, & 101(b) [Title VII, § 703(a)), Oct. 18, 1986, 100 Stat. 1783-75, and amended Pub.L. 99-591, Title I, & 101(b) [Title VII, § 703(a)], Oct. 30, 1986, 100 Stat. 3341-75; Pub.L. 105-314, Title VI, & 605, Oct. 30, 1998, 112 Stat. 2984; Pub.L. 109-248, Title VII. & 707(b). (c), July 27, 2006, 120 Stat. 650.)

marker2/court-doe-103-v-epstein/EFTA02739173/EFTA02739173.metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,947 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-103-v-epstein/EFTA02739173.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 15,
+  "chars": 29452,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 12.26,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            190.332,
+            70.47
+          ],
+          [
+            422.5549011230469,
+            70.47
+          ],
+          [
+            422.5549011230469,
+            102.7330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            190.332,
+            102.7330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO D1SMISS,COUNT VI & \nFOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT & TO STRIKE \nDIRECTED TO PLAINTIFF JANE DOE NO. 103'S \nCOMPLAINT !dated 2/23/20101",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            133.416,
+            308.61
+          ],
+          [
+            480.90789794921875,
+            308.61
+          ],
+          [
+            480.90789794921875,
+            365.2330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            133.416,
+            365.2330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Supporting Memorandum of Law",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            224.60399999999998,
+            70.861572265625
+          ],
+          [
+            389.2007751464844,
+            70.861572265625
+          ],
+          [
+            389.2007751464844,
+            84.7330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            224.60399999999998,
+            84.7330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Principles of Statutory Interpretation",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            216.64799999999997,
+            96.361572265625
+          ],
+          [
+            397.3144226074219,
+            96.361572265625
+          ],
+          [
+            397.3144226074219,
+            110.2330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            216.64799999999997,
+            110.2330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Motion to Dismiss",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            273.564,
+            335.34000000000003
+          ],
+          [
+            372.2920227050781,
+            335.34000000000003
+          ],
+          [
+            372.2920227050781,
+            350.4505920410156
+          ],
+          [
+            273.564,
+            350.4505920410156
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Motion For More Definite Statement and To Strike, Rule 12(e) and (0, F.R.C.P.",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 10,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            100.36800000000001,
+            346.68
+          ],
+          [
+            514.0303955078125,
+            346.68
+          ],
+          [
+            514.0303955078125,
+            362.2330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            100.36800000000001,
+            362.2330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Conclusion",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 11,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            277.848,
+            456.8399999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            335.7364196777344,
+            456.8399999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            335.7364196777344,
+            471.7330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            277.848,
+            471.7330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Certificate of Service",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 11,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            268.05600000000004,
+            702.27
+          ],
+          [
+            381.79791259765625,
+            702.27
+          ],
+          [
+            381.79791259765625,
+            717.7330169677734
+          ],
+          [
+            268.05600000000004,
+            717.7330169677734
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "1 18 USCA \u00a72255 (1999-July 26, 2006):",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 13,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            88.74,
+            98.01
+          ],
+          [
+            318.24,
+            98.01
+          ],
+          [
+            318.24,
+            114.20999999999998
+          ],
+          [
+            88.74,
+            114.20999999999998
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "PART I--CRIMES",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 13,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            116.892,
+            119.88
+          ],
+          [
+            210.52799999999996,
+            119.88
+          ],
+          [
+            210.52799999999996,
+            132.84
+          ],
+          [
+            116.892,
+            132.84
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CHAPTER 110--SEXUAL EXPLOITATION AND OTHER ABUSE OF CHILDREN",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 13,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            116.892,
+            133.65
+          ],
+          [
+            523.872,
+            133.65
+          ],
+          [
+            523.872,
+            160.38
+          ],
+          [
+            116.892,
+            160.38
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CREDIT(S)",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 13,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            124.23600000000002,
+            382.32
+          ],
+          [
+            186.048,
+            382.32
+          ],
+          [
+            186.048,
+            396.09000000000003
+          ],
+          [
+            124.23600000000002,
+            396.09000000000003
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "18 U.S.C. \u00a72255, as amended 2006, Effective July 27, 2006:",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 13,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            124.23600000000002,
+            479.52
+          ],
+          [
+            427.788,
+            479.52
+          ],
+          [
+            427.788,
+            493.29
+          ],
+          [
+            124.23600000000002,
+            493.29
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "PART I--CRIMES",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 13,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            124.23600000000002,
+            493.29
+          ],
+          [
+            217.87199999999999,
+            493.29
+          ],
+          [
+            217.87199999999999,
+            505.43999999999994
+          ],
+          [
+            124.23600000000002,
+            505.43999999999994
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CHAPTER 110--SEXUAL EXPLOITATION AND OTHER ABUSE OF CHILDREN",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 13,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            88.74,
+            507.06000000000006
+          ],
+          [
+            523.872,
+            507.06000000000006
+          ],
+          [
+            523.872,
+            539.46
+          ],
+          [
+            88.74,
+            539.46
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CREDIT(S)",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 14,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            115.66799999999999,
+            169.29
+          ],
+          [
+            181.98341369628906,
+            169.29
+          ],
+          [
+            181.98341369628906,
+            184.18353271484375
+          ],
+          [
+            115.66799999999999,
+            184.18353271484375
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            50
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            70
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            79
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            39
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            84
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            35
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            75
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            29
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            58
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            59
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            67
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            29
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 9,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            71
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            32
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 10,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            55
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 11,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            55
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 12,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            91
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            45
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 13,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            14
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            13
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 14,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            31
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            13
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739173"
+  }
+}

marker2/court-doe-103-v-epstein/EFTA02739188/EFTA02739188.md

@@ -0,0 +1,200 @@
+# UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO. 10-80309-CIV-
+
+JANE DOE No. 103,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFERY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S AMENDED MOTION TO DISMISS,COUNT VI & FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT & TO STRIKE DIRECTED TO PLAINTIFF JANE DOE NO. 103'S COMPLAINT 'dated 2/23/20101
+
+Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, ("EPSTEIN"), by and through his undersigned counsel, files this Amended Motion To Dismiss Count VI, & Motion For More Definite Statement & Strike Directed To PlaintiffJANE DOE 103's Complaint. Defendant moves to dismiss Count Six of Plaintiff JANE DOE 103's Complaint for failure to state a cause of action, as specified herein. Rule 12(b)(6), Fed.R.Civ.P. (2009); Local Gen. Rule 7.1 (S.D. Fla. 2009). Defendant further moves for More Definite Statement and to Strike. Rule 12(e) and (f), In support of his motion, Defendant states:
+
+The Complaint attempts to allege 6 counts, all of which are purportedly brought pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §2255 — Civil Remedies for Personal Injuries. Count Six is subject to dismissal because the predicate act relied upon by Plaintiff for her claims did not come into effect until July 27, 2006, well after the conduct alleged by Plaintiff occurred. The More Definite Statement requested is for Plaintiff to allege her date of birth in that her being a minor has significance in the claims she alleges.
+
+"A"
+
+### Supporting Memorandum of Law
+
+### Principles of Statutory Interpretation
+
+It is well settled that in interpreting a statute, the court's inquiry begins with the plain and unambiguous language of the statutory text. CBS. Inc. v. Prime Time 24 Venture, 245 F.3d 1217 (11th Cir. 2001); U.S. v. Castroneves, 2009 WL 528251, \*3 (S.D. Fla. 2009), citing Reeves v. Astrue, 526 F.3d 732, 734 (11th Cir. 2008); and V. Husband, 376 F.Supp.2d at 610 ("When interpreting a statute, [a court's] inquiry begins with the text."). "The Court must first look to the plain meaning of the words, and scrutinize the statute's `language, structure, and purpose.'" Id. In addition, in construing a statute, a court is to presume that the legislature said what it means and means what it said, and not add language or give some absurd or strained interpretation. As stated in CBS. Inc., supra at 1228 — "Those who ask courts to give effect to perceived legislative intent by interpreting statutory language contrary to its plain and unambiguous meaning are in effect asking courts to alter that language, and `[c]ourts have no authority to alter statutory language.... We cannot add to the terms of [the] provision what Congress left out.' Merritt, 120 F.3d at 1187." See also Dodd v. U.S., 125 S.Q. 2478 (2005); 73 Am.Jur.2d Statutes §124.
+
+Title 18 of the U.S.C. is entitled "Crimes and Criminal Procedure." §2255 is contained in "Part I. Crimes, Chap. 110. Sexual Exploitation and Other Abuse of Children." 18 U.S.C. §2255 (2002)', is entitled Civil remedy for personal injuries, and provides:
+
+<sup>1</sup> The above quoted version of 18 U.S.C. §2255 was the same beginning in 1999 until amended in 2006, effective July 27, 2006.
+
+- (a) Any minor who is a victim of a violation of section 2241(c), 2242, 2243, 2251, 2251A, 2252, 2252A, 2260, 2421, 2422, or 2423 of this title and who suffers personal injury as a result of such violation may sue in any appropriate United States District Court and shall recover the actual damages such minor sustains and the cost of the suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee. Any minor as described in the preceding sentence shall be deemed to have sustained damages of no less than \$50,000 in value.
+- (b) Any action commenced under this section shall be barred unless the complaint is filed within six years after the right of action first accrues or in the case of a person under a legal disability, not later than three years after the disability.
+
+See endnote 1 hereto for statutory text as amended in 2006, effective July 27, 2006. Prior to the 2006 amendments, the version of the statute quoted above was in effect beginning in 1999.1
+
+All of Plaintiff's allegations of abuse occurred between January 2004 and May 2005 (par. 18), well prior to 18 U.S.C. §2255 being amended.
+
+## Motion to Dismiss
+
+Plaintiff's reliance on the amended version of 18 U.S.C. V255, such reliance is improper. The version of Defendant's position that 18 U.S.C. 82255 in effect prior to the 2006 amendments applies to this action, and therefore Count Six is required to be dismissed as it relies on a predicate act that was not in effect at the time of the alleged conduct.23
+
+Plaintiff does not specifically allege in her Complaint on which version of 18 U.S.C. §2255 she is relying. However, in Count Six of her Complaint, ¶50, she alleges that Defendant "knowingly engaged in a child exploitation enterprise, as defined in 18 U.S.C. §2252A(g)(2), in violation of 18 U.S.C. §2252A(g)(l)." §2252A is one of the
+
+<sup>2</sup> Points (2) and (3) are addressed together as the legal arguments overlap.
+
+<sup>3</sup> In other §2255 actions filed against Defendant, Defendant has previously asserted the position that 18 U.S.C. §2255's creates a single cause of action on behalf of a plaintiff against a defendant, as opposed to multiple causes of action on a per violation basis or as opposed to an allowance of a multiplication of the statutory presumptive minimum damages or 'actual damages." EPSTEIN asserts his position regarding the single recovery of damages in order to properly preserve all issues pertaining to the proper application of §2255 for appeal. EPSTEIN will fully honor his obligations as set forth in the Non-Prosecution Agreement with the United States Attorney's Office; principally, as related to the claims made in this case by Jane Doe 103, the obligations as set forth in paragraph 8 of that Agreement. In particular, EPSTEIN will not contest the allegation that he committed at least one predicate offense as alleged by Jane Doe 103.
+
+specified predicate acts under 18 U.S.C. §2255. However, subsection (g) of §2252 was not added to the statute until 2006. Thus, to the extent that Plaintiff is relying on the amended version of 18 U.S.C. §2255, such reliance is improper and Count Six is required to be dismissed as it relies on a statutory predicate act that did not exist at the time of the alleged conduct.
+
+According to Plaintiff's allegations, the alleged conduct of EPSTEIN directed to Plaintiff occurred beginning in January 2004 until approximately May 2005. In Count VI, in attempting to assert a claim pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §2255, Plaintiff is relying on subsection, (g)(1) and (2), of the criminal statute 18 U.S.C. §2252A as the requisite predicate act. Subsection (g) of §2252A was not even in existence at the time of the alleged conduct. Subsection (g) was enacted in 2006, effective July 27, 2006. See 2006 Amendments; Pub.L. 109-248, § 701, added subsec. (g). 18 U.S.C.A. § 2252A. As discussed more fully below herein, reliance on subsection (g) violates the well entrenched constitutional principles against retroactivity, and, thus, Count VI is required to be dismissed.
+
+The statute in effect during the time the alleged conduct occurred is 18 U.S.C. §2255 (2005) — the version in effect prior to the 2006 amendment, eff. Jul. 27, 2006, (quoted above), and having an effective date of 1999 through July 26, 2006. See endnote 1 hereto. Plaintiff's Complaint alleges that Defendant's conduct occurred during the time period from the age of 17, January 2004 until approximately May 2005. Complaint, ¶¶17, 18. Thus, the version in effect in 2004-2005 of 18 U.S.C. §2255 applies.
+
+It is an axiom of law that “retroactivity is not favored in the law.” Bowen, 488 U.S., at 208, 109 S.Ct., at 471 (1988). As eloquently stated in Landgraf v. USI Film Products, 114 S.Ct. 1483, 1497, 511 U.S. 244, 265-66 (1994):
+
+... the presumption against retroactive legislation is deeply rooted in our jurisprudence, and embodies a legal doctrine centuries older than our Republic. Elementary considerations of fairness dictate that individuals should have an opportunity to know what the law is and to conform their conduct accordingly; settled expectations should not be lightly disrupted.<sup>FN18</sup> For that reason, the “principle that the legal effect of conduct should ordinarily be assessed under the law that existed when the conduct took place has timeless and universal appeal.” *Kaiser*, 494 U.S., at 855, 110 S.Ct., at 1586 (SCALIA, J., concurring). In a free, dynamic society, creativity in both commercial and artistic endeavors is fostered by a rule of law that gives people confidence about the legal consequences of their actions.
+
+FN18. See *General Motors Corp. v. Romein*, 503 U.S. 181, 191, 112 S.Ct. 1105, 1112, 117 L.Ed.2d 328 (1992) (“Retroactive legislation presents problems of unfairness that are more serious than those posed by prospective legislation, because it can deprive citizens of legitimate expectations and upset settled transactions”); [Further citations omitted].
+
+It is therefore not surprising that the antiretroactivity principle finds expression in several provisions of our Constitution. The *Ex Post Facto* Clause flatly prohibits retroactive application of penal legislation.<sup>FN19</sup> Article I, § 10, cl. 1, prohibits States from passing another type of retroactive legislation, laws “impairing the Obligation of Contracts.” The Fifth Amendment’s Takings Clause prevents the Legislature (and other government actors) from depriving private persons of vested property rights except for a “public use” and upon payment of “just compensation.” The prohibitions on “Bills of Attainder” in Art. I, §§ 9-10, prohibit legislatures from singling out disfavored persons and meeting out summary punishment for past conduct. See, *e.g.*, *United States v. [REDACTED]*, 381 U.S. 437, 456-462, 85 S.Ct. 1707, 1719-1722, 14 L.Ed.2d 484 (1965). The Due Process Clause also protects the interests in fair notice and repose that may be compromised by retroactive legislation; a justification sufficient to validate a statute’s prospective application under the Clause “may not suffice” to warrant its retroactive application. *Usery v. Turner Elkhorn Mining Co.*, 428 U.S. 1, 17, 96 S.Ct. 2882, 2893, 49 L.Ed.2d 752 (1976).
+
+FN19. Article I contains two *Ex Post Facto* Clauses, one directed to Congress (§ 9, cl. 3), the other to the States (§ 10, cl. 1). We have construed the Clauses as applicable only to penal legislation. See *Calder v. Bull*, 3 Dall. 386, 390-391, 1 L.Ed. 648 (1798) (opinion of Chase, J.).
+
+These provisions demonstrate that retroactive statutes raise particular concerns. The Legislature’s unmatched powers allow it to sweep away settled expectations suddenly and without individualized consideration. Its responsivity to political pressures poses a risk that it may be tempted to use retroactive legislation as a means of retribution against unpopular groups or individuals. As Justice Marshall observed in his opinion for \*\*1498 the Court in *Weaver v. Graham*, 450 U.S. 24, 101 S.Ct. 960, 67 L.Ed.2d 17
+
+(1981), the Et Post Facto Clause not only ensures that individuals have "fair warning" about the effect of criminal statutes, but also "restricts governmental power by restraining arbitrary and potentially vindictive legislation." Id., at 28-29, 101 S.Ct., at %3-964 (citations omitted). F142°
+
+FN20. See Richmond v. J. A. Croson Co., 488 U.S. 469, 513-514, 109 S.Ct. 706, 732, 102 L.Ed.2d 854 (1989) ("Legislatures are primarily policymaking bodies that promulgate rules to govern future conduct. The constitutional prohibitions against the enactment of ex post facto laws and bills of attainder reflect a valid concern about the use of the political process to punish or characterize past conduct of private citizens. It is the judicial system, rather than the legislative process, that is best equipped to identify past wrongdoers and to fashion remedies that will create the conditions that presumably would have existed had no wrong been committed") (STEVENS, J., concurring in part and concurring in judgment); James v. United States, 366 U.S. 213, 247, n. 3, 81 S.Ct. 1052, 1052, n. 3, 6 L.Ed.2d 246 (1961) (retroactive punitive measures may reflect "a purpose not to prevent dangerous conduct generally but to impose by legislation a penalty against specific persons or classes of persons").
+
+These well entrenched constitutional protections and presumptions against retroactive application of legislation establish that 18 U.S.C. §2255 (2005) in effect at the time of the alleged conduct applies to the instant action, and not the amended version.
+
+Not only is there no clear express intent stating that the statute is to apply retroactively, but applying the current version of the statute, as amended in 2006, would be in clear violation of the Ex Post Facto Clause of the United States Constitution as it would be applied to events occurring before its enactment and would increase the penalty or punishment for the alleged crime. U.S. Const. Art. 1, §9, cl. 3, §10, cl. 1. U.S. v. Seigel 153 F.3d 1256 (11th Cir. 1998); U.S. v. 162 F.3d 87 (3d Cir. 1998); and generally, Calder v. Bull 3 U.S. 386, 390,1 L.Ed. 648, 1798 WL 587 (Calder) (1798).
+
+The United States Constitution provides that "[n]o Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed" by Congress. U.S. Const. art. I, § 9, cl. 3. A law violates the Ex Post Facto Clause if it " sappli[es] to events occurring before its enactment ... [and] disadvantage[s] the offender affected by it' by altering the definition of criminal conduct or increasing the punishment for the crime." Lvnce v. Mathis, 519 U.S. 433, 117 S.Ct. 891, 137 L.Ed.2d 63 (1997) (quoting Weaver v. Graham, 450 U.S. 24, 29, 101 S.Ct. 960, 67 L.Ed.2d 17 (1981)).
+
+U.S. v. Siegel 153 F.3d 1256, 1259 (11th Cir. 1998).
+
+The statute, as amended in 2006, contains no language stating that the application is to be retroactive. Thus, there is no manifest intent that the statute is to apply retroactively, and, accordingly, the statute in effect during the time of the alleged conduct is to apply. Landgraf v. USI Film Products, supra, at 1493, ("A statement that a statute will become effective on a certain date does not even arguably suggest that it has any application to conduct that occurred at an earlier date.").
+
+This statute was enacted as part of the Federal Criminal Statutes targeting sexual predators and sex crimes against children. H.R. 3494, "Child Protection and Sexual Predator Punishment Act of 1998;" House Report No. 105-557, 11, 1998 U.S.C.A.N. 678, 679 (1998). Quoting from the "Background and Need For Legislation" portion of the House Report No. 105-557, 11-16, H.R. 3494, of which 18 U.S.C. §2255 is included, is described as "the most comprehensive package of new crimes and increased penalties ever developed in response to crimes against children, particularly assaults facilitated by computers." Further showing that §2255 was enacted as a criminal penalty or punishment, "Title II — Punishing Sexual Predators," Sec. 206, from House Report No. 105-557, 5-6, specifically includes reference to the remedy created under §2255 as an additional means of punishing sexual predators, along with other penalties and punishments. Senatorial Comments in amending §2255 in 2006 confirm that the creation of the presumptive minimum damage amount is meant as an additional penalty against those who sexually exploit or abuse children. 2006 WL 2034118, 152 Cong. Rec. S8012- 02. Senator Kerry refers to the statutorily imposed damage amount as "penalties." Id.
+
+The cases of U.S. v. Siegel, supra (11th Cir. 1998), and U.S. v supra (3d Cir. 1998), also support Defendant's position that application of the current version of 18 U.S.C. §2255 would be in clear violation of the Ex Post Facto Clause. In Siegel, the Eleventh Circuit found that the Ex Post Facto Clause bared application of the Mandatory Victim Restitution Act of 1996 (MVRA) to the defendant whose criminal conduct occurred before the effective date of the statute, 18 U.S.C. §3664(1)(1)(A), even though the guilty plea and sentencing proceeding occurred after the effective date of the statute. On July 19, 1996, the defendant Siegel pleaded guilty to various charges under 18 U.S.C. §371 and §1956(a)(1)(A), (conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud, bank fraud, and laundering of money instruments; and money laundering). He was sentenced on March 7, 1997. As part of his sentence, Siegel was ordered to pay \$1,207,000.00 in restitution under the MVRA which became effective on April 24, 1996. Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214, 1229-1236. The 1996 amendments to MVRA required that the district court must order restitution in the full amount of the victim's loss without consideration of the defendant's ability to pay. Prior to the enactment of the MVRA and under the former 18 U.S.C. §3664(a) of the Victim and Witness Protection Act of 1982 (VWPA), Pub.I. No. 97-291, 96 Stat. 1248, the court was required to consider, among other factors, the defendant's ability to pay in determining the amount of restitution.
+
+When the MVRA was enacted in 1996, Congress stated that the amendments to the VWPA "shall, to the extent constitutionally permissible, be effective for sentencing proceedings in cases in which the defendant is convicted on or after the date of enactment of this Act [Apr. 24, 19961." Siegel, supra at 1258. The alleged crimes occurred between February, 1988 to May, 1990. The Court agreed with the defendant's position that 1996 MVRA "should not be applied in reviewing the validity of the court's restitution order
+
+because to do so would violate the Ex Post Facto Clause of the United States Constitution. See U.S. Const. art I, §9, cl. 3."
+
+The Ex Post Facto analysis made by the Eleventh Circuit in Siegel is applicable to this action. In resolving the issue in favor of the defendant, the Court first considered whether a restitution order is a punishment. Id, at 1259. In determining that restitution was a punishment, the Court noted that §3663A(a)(1) of Title 18 expressly describes restitution as a "penalty." In addition, the Court also noted that "[a]lthough not in the context of an ex post facto determination, ... restitution is a 'criminal penalty meant to have strong deterrent and rehabilitative effect.' United States v. Twitty 107 F.3d 1482, 1493 n. 12 (11th Cir.1997)." Second, the Court considered "whether the imposition of restitution under the MVRA is an increased penalty as prohibited by the Ex Post Facto Clause." Id, at 1259. In determining that the application of the 1996 MVRA would indeed run afoul of the Constitution's Ex Post Facto Clause, the Court agreed with the majority of the Circuits that restitution under the 1996 MVRA was an increased penalty.4 "The effect of the MVRA can be detrimental to a defendant. Previously, after considering the defendant's financial condition, the court had the discretion to order restitution in an amount less than the loss sustained by the victim. Under the MVRA, however, the court must order restitution to each victim in the full amount." Id, at 1260. See also U.S. v. a 162 F.2d 87 (3rd Circuit 1998).
+
+<sup>4</sup> The Eleventh Circuit, in holding that "the MVRA cannot be applied to a person whose criminal conduct occurred prior to April 24, 1996," was "persuaded by the majority of districts on this issue." "Restitution is a criminal penalty carrying with it characteristics of criminal punishment." Siegel, supra at 1260. The Eleventh Circuit is in agreement with the Second, Third, Eighth, Ninth, and D.C. Circuits. See U.S. v. Futrell 209 F.3d 1286, 1289-90 (11 th Cir. 2000).
+
+As discussed above, 18 U.S.C. §2255 was enacted as part of the criminal statutory scheme to punish and penalize those who sexually exploit and abuse minors, and thus, the Ex Post Fact Clause prohibits a retroactive application of the 2006 amended version.
+
+Notwithstanding the above legal analysis, in the recent case of Individual Known to Defendant As 08MIST096•JPG and 08mist067.ipg v. Falso, 2009 WL 4807537 (N.D. N.Y. Dec. 9, 2009), United States District Court for the Northern District of New York addressed the issue of whether §2255 is a civil or criminal statute for purposes of the constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy. The New York Court stated that "looking to the plain language of §2255(a), it is clear that the statutory intent was to provide a civil remedy. This is exemplified by the title ... and the fact that the statute aims to provide compensation to individuals who suffered personal injury as a result of criminal conduct against them." The New York Court in analyzing whether §2255 violated the Constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy, concluded that although the behavior to which §2255 is criminal, it did not find that the "primary aim" was "retribution and deterrence." "The statute serves civil goals." The "primary aim" is "the compensation for personal injuries sustained as a result of criminal conduct."
+
+Therefore, because Jane Doe 103 has invoked the provisions of the criminal Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) between EPSTEIN and USAO (see paragraphs 25 and 26 of complaint), plaintiff cannot avoid the full protection of the rule of lenity and due process to which EPSTEIN is entitled in the context of these unique factual circumstances.
+
+Although there does not exist any definitive ruling of whether the damages awarded under §2255 are meant as criminal punishment or a civil damages award, Defendant is still entitled to a determination as a matter of law that the statute in effect at the time of the alleged criminal conduct applies.
+
+As explained by the Landgrafcourt, supra at 280, and at 1505,5
+
+When a case implicates a federal statute enacted after the events in suit, the court's first task is to determine whether Congress has expressly prescribed the statute's proper reach. If Congress has done so, of course, there is no need to resort to judicial default rules. When, however, the statute contains no such express command, the court must determine whether the new statute would have retroactive effect, Le., whether it would impair rights a party possessed when he acted, increase a party's liability for past conduct, or impose new duties with respect to transactions already completed. If the statute would operate retroactively, our traditional presumption teaches that it does not govern absent clear congressional intent favoring such a result.
+
+Here, there is no clear expression of intent regarding the 2006 Act's application to conduct occurring well before its enactment. See discussion of House Bill Reports and Congressional background above herein.
+
+As stated in Landgraf, "the extent of a party's liability, in the civil context as well as the criminal, is an important legal consequence that cannot be ignored." Courts have consistently refused to apply a statute which substantially increases a party's liability to conduct occurring before the statute's enactment. Landgraf, supra at 284-85. Even if plaintiff were to argue that retroactive application of the new statute "would vindicate its purpose more fully," even that consideration is not enough to rebut the presumption against retroactivity. Id, at 285-86. "The presumption against statutory retroactivity is founded upon sound considerations of general policy and practice, and accords with long held and widely shared expectations about the usual operation of legislation." Id.
+
+Thus, Count Six should be dismissed.
+
+<sup>5</sup> In Landgraf, the United States Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the Court of Appeals and refused to apply new provisions of the Civil Rights Act of 1991 to conduct occurring before the effective date of the Act. The Court determined that statutory text in question, \*102, was subject to the presumption against statutory retroactivity.
+
+# Motion For More Definite Statement and To Strike, Rule 12(e) and (U. F.R.C.P.
+
+As noted above, Plaintiff alleges that she was 17 year old high school student as of January, 2004, and that the alleged conduct involving EPSTEIN occurred "between approximately January 2004 and May 2005. Thus, Plaintiff had to be 18 (no longer a minor) by January of 2005. Under the principles of statutory construction, the language of §2255(a) is clear — "Any minor who is a victim of a violation of section ...of this title and who suffers personal injury as a result of such violation may sue in any appropriate United States District Court and shall recover the actual damages such minor sustains and the cost of the suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee. Any minor as described in the preceding sentence shall be deemed to have sustained damages of no less than \$50,000 in value."
+
+As Plaintiff's date of birth is significant to her §2255 claim, she should be required to more definitely state her date of birth so that Defendant and this Court are able to determine precisely when she reached the age of majority. (The age of majority under both federal and state law is 18 years old. See 18 U.S.C. §2256(1), defining a "minor" as "any person under the age of eighteen years;" and §1.01, Definitions, Fla. Stat., defining "minor" to include "any person who has not attained the age of 18 years.")
+
+To the extent that Plaintiff is relying on any alleged conduct that occurred after her 18 birthday as an element of her §2255 claim, such allegations should be stricken as immaterial and she should be required to more definitely state the dates of the alleged conduct. See Rule 12(1). Defendant also seeks to strike ¶¶10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16, of Plaintiff's Complaint as immaterial and impertinent. None of the allegations in those paragraphs specifically pertain to the Plaintiff. Not until ¶17 does Plaintiff assert
+
+allegations pertaining to her and the conduct of Defendant directly involving her. What EPSTEIN may or may not have allegedly done with respect to other alleged girls does not effect Plaintiff's claim brought pursuant to §2255. The allegations in ¶¶10-16 are not related to the elements of Plaintiffs §2255 claim and, thus, are required to be stricken.
+
+### Conclusion
+
+Pursuant to the above, Count Six is required to be dismissed. In addition, Plaintiff should be required to more definitely state her date of birth, and any conduct occurring after her 18th birthday should be stricken, and ¶¶l0 — 16 of the Complaint should also be stricken.
+
+WHEREFORE, Defendant requests that this Court dismiss Count Six against him, and further grant his Motion for More Definite Statement and to Strike.
+
+/s/ Robert D. Critton
+
+Robert D. Critton, Esq. Attorney for Defendant
+
+## Certificate of Service
+
+I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record identified on the following Service List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on this 12'h day of April, 2010.
+
+Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Katherine W. Ezell, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 25 West Flagler Street, Suite 800 Miami, FL 33130 305 358-2800 Fax: 305 358-2382 nosefsberg@podhurst.com kezell@podhurst.com Counsel for Plaintiff
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 561-659-8300 Fax: 561-835-8691 jagesq®bellsouth.net Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+By: /s/ Robert D. Critton
+
+ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ.
+
+Florida Bar No. 224162
+
+rcrit@bciclaw.com
+
+MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ.
+
+Florida Bar #617296
+
+moikeabcIclaw.com
+
+BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTHER & COLEMAN
+
+303 Banyan Blvd., Suite 400
+
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+
+561/842-2820 Phone
+
+561/515-3148 Fax
+
+(Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein)
+
+<sup>1</sup> **18 USCA §2255 (1999-July 26, 2006):**
+
+**PART I--CRIMES**
+
+**CHAPTER 110--SEXUAL EXPLOITATION AND OTHER ABUSE OF CHILDREN**
+
+§ 2255. Civil remedy for personal injuries
+
+**(a)** Any minor who is a victim of a violation of section 2241(c), 2242, 2243, 2251, 2251A, 2252, 2252A, 2260, 2421, 2422, or 2423 of this title and who suffers personal injury as a result of such violation may sue in any appropriate United States District Court and shall recover the actual damages such minor sustains and the cost of the suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee. Any minor as described in the preceding sentence shall be deemed to have sustained damages of no less than \$50,000 in value.
+
+**(b)** Any action commenced under this section shall be barred unless the complaint is filed within six years after the right of action first accrues or in the case of a person under a legal disability, not later than three years after the disability.
+
+**CREDIT(S)**
+
+(Added Pub.L. 99-500, Title I, § 101(b) [Title VII, § 703(a)], Oct. 18, 1986, 100 Stat. 1783-75, and amended Pub.L. 99-591, Title I, § 101(b) [Title VII, § 703(a)], Oct. 30, 1986, 100 Stat. 3341-75; Pub.L. 105-314, Title VI, § 605, Oct. 30, 1998, 112 Stat. 2984.)
+
+**18 U.S.C. §2255, as amended 2006, Effective July 27, 2006:**
+
+**PART I--CRIMES**
+
+**CHAPTER 110--SEXUAL EXPLOITATION AND OTHER ABUSE OF CHILDREN**
+
+**§ 2255. Civil remedy for personal injuries**
+
+**(a) In general.--**Any person who, while a minor, was a victim of a violation of section 2241(c), 2242, 2243, 2251, 2251A, 2252, 2252A, 2260, 2421, 2422, or 2423 of this title and who suffers personal injury as a result of such violation, regardless of whether the injury occurred while such person was a minor, may sue in any appropriate United States District Court and shall recover the actual damages such person sustains and the cost of the suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee. Any person as described in the preceding sentence shall be deemed to have sustained damages of no less than \$150,000 in value.
+
+(b) Statute of limitations.--Any action commenced under this section shall be barred unless the complaint is filed within six years after the right of action first accrues or in the case of a person under a legal disability, not later than three years after the disability.
+
+### CREDIT(S)
+
+(Added Pub.L. 99-500, Title I, 101(b) [Title VII, § 703(a)], Oct. 18, 1986, 100 Stat. 1783-75, and amended Pub.L. 99-591. Title I. 101(b) [Title VII, § 703(a)], Oct. 30, 1986, 100 Stat. 3341-75; Pub.L. 105-314. Title VI, § 605, Oct. 30, 1998, 112 Stat. 2984; Pub.L. 109-248, Title VII, 707(b). (c), July 27, 2006, 120 Stat. 650.)

marker2/court-doe-103-v-epstein/EFTA02739188/EFTA02739188.metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,996 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-103-v-epstein/EFTA02739188.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 16,
+  "chars": 30548,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 12.58,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            191.55599999999998,
+            72.9
+          ],
+          [
+            426.36651611328125,
+            72.9
+          ],
+          [
+            426.36651611328125,
+            106.10302734375
+          ],
+          [
+            191.55599999999998,
+            106.10302734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S AMENDED MOTION TO DISMISS,COUNT \nVI & FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT & TO STRIKE DIRECTED \nTO PLAINTIFF JANE DOE NO. 103'S COMPLAINT 'dated 2/23/20101",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            111.99600000000001,
+            310.23
+          ],
+          [
+            508.3851318359375,
+            310.23
+          ],
+          [
+            508.3851318359375,
+            355.10302734375
+          ],
+          [
+            111.99600000000001,
+            355.10302734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Supporting Memorandum of Law",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            227.052,
+            100.41888427734375
+          ],
+          [
+            392.9507751464844,
+            100.41888427734375
+          ],
+          [
+            392.9507751464844,
+            114.80352783203125
+          ],
+          [
+            227.052,
+            114.80352783203125
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Principles of Statutory Interpretation",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            217.87199999999999,
+            126.35999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            400.6844177246094,
+            126.35999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            400.6844177246094,
+            140.2230224609375
+          ],
+          [
+            217.87199999999999,
+            140.2230224609375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Motion to Dismiss",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            276.624,
+            362.07
+          ],
+          [
+            375.15228271484375,
+            362.07
+          ],
+          [
+            375.15228271484375,
+            377.2145690917969
+          ],
+          [
+            276.624,
+            377.2145690917969
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Motion For More Definite Statement and To Strike, Rule 12(e) and (U. F.R.C.P.",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 11,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            102.20400000000001,
+            70.1015625
+          ],
+          [
+            515.1185302734375,
+            70.1015625
+          ],
+          [
+            515.1185302734375,
+            86.2330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            102.20400000000001,
+            86.2330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Conclusion",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 12,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            279.684,
+            181.4815673828125
+          ],
+          [
+            337.2277526855469,
+            181.4815673828125
+          ],
+          [
+            337.2277526855469,
+            194.9830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            279.684,
+            194.9830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Certificate of Service",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 12,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            269.892,
+            426.87000000000006
+          ],
+          [
+            383.6679382324219,
+            426.87000000000006
+          ],
+          [
+            383.6679382324219,
+            441.7330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            269.892,
+            441.7330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "1 18 USCA \u00a72255 (1999-July 26, 2006):",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 14,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            90.576,
+            100.44
+          ],
+          [
+            320.688,
+            100.44
+          ],
+          [
+            320.688,
+            115.01999999999998
+          ],
+          [
+            90.576,
+            115.01999999999998
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "PART I--CRIMES",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 14,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            118.116,
+            121.5
+          ],
+          [
+            212.97599999999997,
+            121.5
+          ],
+          [
+            212.97599999999997,
+            134.46
+          ],
+          [
+            118.116,
+            134.46
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CHAPTER 110--SEXUAL EXPLOITATION AND OTHER ABUSE OF CHILDREN",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 14,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            118.116,
+            134.46
+          ],
+          [
+            526.932,
+            134.46
+          ],
+          [
+            526.932,
+            162.0
+          ],
+          [
+            118.116,
+            162.0
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CREDIT(S)",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 14,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            126.072,
+            383.13
+          ],
+          [
+            188.496,
+            383.13
+          ],
+          [
+            188.496,
+            396.90000000000003
+          ],
+          [
+            126.072,
+            396.90000000000003
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "18 U.S.C. \u00a72255, as amended 2006, Effective July 27, 2006:",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 14,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            126.072,
+            479.52
+          ],
+          [
+            430.84799999999996,
+            479.52
+          ],
+          [
+            430.84799999999996,
+            493.29
+          ],
+          [
+            126.072,
+            493.29
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "PART I--CRIMES",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 14,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            126.072,
+            492.48
+          ],
+          [
+            220.93199999999996,
+            492.48
+          ],
+          [
+            220.93199999999996,
+            506.25
+          ],
+          [
+            126.072,
+            506.25
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CHAPTER 110--SEXUAL EXPLOITATION AND OTHER ABUSE OF CHILDREN",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 14,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            91.18799999999999,
+            506.25
+          ],
+          [
+            528.156,
+            506.25
+          ],
+          [
+            528.156,
+            540.27
+          ],
+          [
+            91.18799999999999,
+            540.27
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "\u00a7 2255. Civil remedy for personal injuries",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 14,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            119.952,
+            548.3700000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            336.6,
+            548.3700000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            336.6,
+            562.14
+          ],
+          [
+            119.952,
+            562.14
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CREDIT(S)",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 15,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            118.116,
+            167.67000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            182.8675994873047,
+            167.67000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            182.8675994873047,
+            182.2330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            118.116,
+            182.2330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            52
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            70
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            87
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            40
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            49
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            13
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            99
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            38
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            57
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            54
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            72
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 9,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            52
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 10,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            72
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            32
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 11,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 12,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            89
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            42
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            9
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 13,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            34
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            17
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            13
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 14,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            13
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            13
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 15,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            31
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            13
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739188"
+  }
+}

marker2/court-doe-103-v-epstein/EFTA02739204/EFTA02739204.md

@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO. 10-80309-CIV-
+
+JANE DOE No. 103,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFERY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO AMEND DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS. & FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT & STRIKE DIRECTED TO PLAINTIFF JANE DOE NO. 103'S COMPLAINT Idated 4/5/20101
+
+Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, ("EPSTEIN"), by and through his undersigned counsel, moves to amend by his previously filed Motion To Dismiss, & Motion For More Definite Statement & Strike Directed To Plaintiff JANE DOE 103 's Complaint, (hereinafter "Motion To Dismiss"), dated and filed April 5, 2010. In support of his motion, Defendant states:
+
+1. On April 5, 2010, Defendant previously filed with this Court his Motion To Dismiss. Defendant seeks dismissal of Count VI, which is brought pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §2255, because Plaintiff is relying on a criminal predicate act enumerated in §2255 that did not come into effect until after the alleged time period of the alleged conduct by Defendant involving Plaintiff. 18 U.S.C. §2252A(g), the criminal statute relied upon by Plaintiff in attempting to assert her §2255 claim in Count VI, was not enacted until 2006; the allegedly violative conduct by Defendant occurred, according to Plaintiff's own
+
+allegations, beginning in January 2004 until approximately May 2005. As argued in Defendant's motion to dismiss, Count VI is required to be dismissed because it violates the constitutional principles against retroactivity. See pages 3-11 of Defendant's motion to dismiss.
+
+2. Defendant is not seeking to raise a new argument, but is seeking to clarify the argument made in his motion to dismiss (pp. 3-11). Under the heading — "Motion To Dismiss" — at page 3-4, in the first paragraph, Defendant states in part that - "However, subsection (g) of §2252 was not added to the statute until 2006. Thus, to the extent that Plaintiff is relying on the amended version of §2255, such reliance is improper and Count VI is required to be dismissed as it relies on a statutory predicate act that did not exist at the time of the alleged conduct."
+
+3. Defendant seeks to add the following sentences (paragraph) after the first paragraph, at page 4, to clarify the argument being made.
+
+According to Plaintiff's allegations, the alleged conduct of EPSTEIN directed to Plaintiff occurred beginning in January 2004 until approximately May 2005. In Count VI, in attempting to assert a claim pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §2255, Plaintiff is relying on subsection, (g)(1) and (2), of the criminal statute 18 U.S.C. §2252A as the requisite predicate act. Subsection (g) of §2252A was not even in existence at the time of the alleged conduct. Subsection (g) was enacted in 2006, effective July 27, 2006. See 2006 Amendments; Pub.L. 109-248, § 701, added subsec. (g). 18 U.S.C.A. § 2252A. As discusced more fully below herein, reliance on subsection (g) violates the well entrenched constitutional principles against retroactivity, and, thus, Count VI is required to be dismissed.
+
+4. Defendant also adds a sentence in the introductory paragraph of the Amended Motion To Dismiss, attached hereto as Exhibit A, simply stating that it is an amended motion.
+
+5. Such amendment is in the interest of justice and will allow both the Court and the Plaintiff to understand and address the argument made by Defendant in his motion to dismiss.
+
+6. Defendant further requests that the Amended Motion To Dismiss, Exhibit A hereto, be deemed filed as of the date of this motion.
+
+7. Pursuant to Rule 15(a)(2), Fed.R.Civ.P., Defendant sought the consent of the opposing party as to the above amendment/supplement to his motion to dismiss. Plaintiff's counsel did not oppose the amendment/supplement.
+
+WHEREFORE, Defendant respectfully requests that this Court enter an Order granting Defendant's motion and deeming as filed as of the date of this motion Defendant's Amended Motion To Dismiss, & Motion For More Definite Statement & Strike Directed To Plaintiff JANE DOE 103 's Complaint, attached hereto as Exhibit A.
+
+> /s/ Robert D. Critton Robert D. Critton, Esq. Attorney for Defendant
+
+## Certificate of Service
+
+I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record identified on the following Service List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on this 12th day of April 2010.
+
+Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Katherine W. Ezell, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
+
+Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 25 West Flagler Street, Suite 800 Miami, FL 33130 305 358-2800 Fax: 305 358-2382 riosefsberg@rrodhurst.com kezell@podhurst.com Counsel for Plaintiff
+
+250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 561-659-8300 Fax: 561-835-8691 iaReso®bellsouth.net Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+By: /s/ Robert D. Critton ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar No. 224162 rcrit@bcIclaw.com MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 mpike@bciclaw.com BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN 303 Banyan Blvd., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561/842-2820 Phone 561/515-3148 Fax (Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein)

marker2/court-doe-103-v-epstein/EFTA02739204/EFTA02739204.metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,238 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-103-v-epstein/EFTA02739204.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 4,
+  "chars": 5270,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 0.82,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            192.78000000000003,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            426.74652099609375,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            426.74652099609375,
+            105.35302734375
+          ],
+          [
+            192.78000000000003,
+            105.35302734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO AMEND DEFENDANT'S \nMOTION TO DISMISS. & FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT & \nSTRIKE DIRECTED TO PLAINTIFF JANE DOE NO. 103'S \nCOMPLAINT Idated 4/5/20101",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            126.68399999999998,
+            309.42
+          ],
+          [
+            495.61553955078125,
+            309.42
+          ],
+          [
+            495.61553955078125,
+            368.2330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            126.68399999999998,
+            368.2330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Certificate of Service",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            270.504,
+            567.0
+          ],
+          [
+            385.58050537109375,
+            567.0
+          ],
+          [
+            385.58050537109375,
+            581.9830169677734
+          ],
+          [
+            270.504,
+            581.9830169677734
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            50
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            9
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            57
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            9
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            63
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            32
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739204"
+  }
+}

marker2/court-doe-103-v-epstein/EFTA02739208/EFTA02739208.md

@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 10-80309-WJZ
+
+JANE DOE NO. 103
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## ORDER
+
+THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Plaintiff's Agreed Motion for Extension ofTime to File a Response to Defendant Epstein's Amended Motion to Dismiss Count VI and for More Definite Statement and to Strike. The Court being fully advised in the premises, including Defendant's agreement to the relief requested, it is hereby,
+
+ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that
+
+I. Plaintiff's Agreed Motion for Extension of Time to File a Response to Defendant Epstein's Amended Motion to Dismiss Count VI and for More Definite Statement and to Strike is hereby GRANTED. The Plaintiff has up to and including May 13, 2010 within which to file her response.
+
+DONE AND ORDERED in at Fort Lauderdale, Florida this day of April, 2010.
+
+UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
+
+cc: All counsel of record

marker2/court-doe-103-v-epstein/EFTA02739208/EFTA02739208.metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-103-v-epstein/EFTA02739208.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 1,
+  "chars": 921,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 0.76,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            406.8305969238281,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            406.8305969238281,
+            100.23248291015625
+          ],
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            100.23248291015625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "ORDER",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            280.908,
+            310.44879150390625
+          ],
+          [
+            330.0486145019531,
+            310.44879150390625
+          ],
+          [
+            330.0486145019531,
+            326.8804626464844
+          ],
+          [
+            280.908,
+            326.8804626464844
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            47
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            24
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739208"
+  }
+}

marker2/court-doe-103-v-epstein/EFTA02739209/EFTA02739209.md

@@ -0,0 +1,185 @@
+#### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 10-80309-WJZ
+
+JANE DOE NO. 103
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+### PLAINTIFF'S AGREED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S AMENDED MOTION TO DISMISS COUNT VI AND FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT AND TO STRIKE
+
+Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 103, by and through her undersigned counsel, moves this Court for the entry of an order granting an extension of time to file response to Defendant Epstein's Amended Motion to Dismiss Count VI and for More Definite Statement and to Strike [DE 15], on the following grounds:
+
+- 1. Plaintiff's response to Defendant Epstein's Amended Motion to Dismiss Count VI and for More Definite Statement and to Strike is presently due on April 22, 2010.
+- 2. Undersigned Plaintiff's counsel is due to leave for vacation in Italy tomorrow. Additional time is needed for circulating the response among co-counsel and for the undersigned to address any necessary modifications upon her return. Plaintiff needs an extension until May 13, 2010, to file her response.
+  - 3. This case is in the early stages. The requested extension will not impact any other
+
+deadlines in this case.
+
+WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 103, respectfully requests that this Court grant Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to File a Response to Defendant Epstein's Amended Motion to Dismiss Count VI and for More Definite Statement and to Strike.
+
+# CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL RULE 7.1.A.3
+
+Undersigned counsel conferred with counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein, Robert Critton, Esquire, who graciously advised that we may represent to the Court that he is in agreement with this motion.
+
+DATED this 22's day of April, 2010.
+
+Respectfully submitted, PODHURST ORSECK, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiff Doe No. 103
+
+By: s/Katherine W. Ezell Robert C. Josefsberg Fla. Bar No. 040856 riosefsberg®nodhurst.com Katherine W. Ezell Fla. Bar No. 114771 kezell@oodhurstcom City National Bank Building 25 W. Flagler Street, Suite 800 Miami, FL 33130 Telephone: (305) 358-2800 Facsimile: (305) 358-2382
+
+### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
+
+WE HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 22nd day of April, 2010, a copy of the foregoing was served this day on all counsel of record on the attached Service List via e-mail transmission.
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+PODHURST ORSECK, P.A.
+
+Attorneys for Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 103
+
+By: 5/1cptherine W. Ezel, Robert C. Josefsberg Fla. Bar No. 040856 riosefsbergaroodhurst.com Katherine W. Ezell Fla. Bar No. 114771 kezellOpodhurst.corn City National Bank Building 25 W. Flagler Street, Suite 800 Miami, FL 33130 Telephone: (305) 358-2800 Facsimile: (305) 358-2382
+
+# SERVICE LIST
+
+JANE DOE NO. 103 v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN
+
+Case No.: 10-80309
+
+United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
+
+Robert Critton, Esq.
+
+Michael J. Pike, Esq.
+
+Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman LLP
+
+303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400
+
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+
+Phone: (561) 842-2820/Fax: (561) 515-3148
+
+rcritabc1claw.com,
+
+m➢ike@bciclaw.corm
+
+Counsel for Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein
+
+Jack Goldberger, Esq.
+
+Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
+
+250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400
+
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+
+Phone: (561) 659-8300/Fax: (561) 835-8691
+
+jagesq(Thbellsouth.net
+
+Co-Counsel for Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein
+
+Bruce E. Reinhart, Esq.
+
+Bruce E. Reinhart, P.A.
+
+250 South Australian Avenue, Suite 1400
+
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+
+Phone: (561) 202-6360/Fax: (561) 828-0983
+
+ectObrucereinhartlaw.com
+
+Counsel for Co-Defendant,
+
+Jack Scarola, Esq.
+
+Jack P.M, Esq.
+
+Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
+
+2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
+
+West Palm Beach, Florida 33409
+
+Phone: (561) 686-6300/Fax: (561) 383-9456
+
+jsxesearcylaw.com
+
+jph@searcylaw.com
+
+Counsel for Plaintiff in related Case No. 08-80811
+
+Adam Horowitz, Esq.
+
+Stuart Memielstein, Esq.
+
+Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A.
+
+18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218
+
+Miami, FL 33160
+
+Phone: (305) 931-2200/Fax: (305) 931-0877
+
+ahorowitzasexabuseattomey.com
+
+smermclstein(a)sexabuseattomev.co01
+
+Counsellor Plaintlffs in Related Cases Nos. 0840069,08-80119,0840232, 0840380, 08-80381, 08- 80993, 08-80994
+
+Spencer Todd Kuvin, Esq.
+
+Theodore Jon Leopold, Esq.
+
+Leopold Kuvin, P.A.
+
+2925 PGA Boulevard, Suite 200
+
+Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410
+
+Phone: (561) 515-1400/Fax: (561) 515-1401
+
+,kuvin(aleonoldkuvin.com
+
+tleopold@leopoldlcuvin.com
+
+Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-08804
+
+Brad Esq.
+
+Jaffe, Weissing,
+
+Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.
+
+425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
+
+Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
+
+Phone: (954) 524-2820/Fax: (954) 524-2822
+
+brad@pathtejustice.com
+
+Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-80893
+
+Isidro Manuel =, Esq.
+
+Elkins & Boehringer
+
+224 Datum Avenue, Suite 900
+
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+
+Phone: (561) 832-8033/Fax: (561) 832-7137
+
+isidrogarcia@bellsouth.net
+
+Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-80469

marker2/court-doe-103-v-epstein/EFTA02739209/EFTA02739209.metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,334 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-103-v-epstein/EFTA02739209.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 5,
+  "chars": 4922,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.75,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            69.66
+          ],
+          [
+            405.96038818359375,
+            69.66
+          ],
+          [
+            405.96038818359375,
+            98.9830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            98.9830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "PLAINTIFF'S AGREED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE \nTO DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S AMENDED MOTION TO DISMISS \nCOUNT VI AND FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT AND TO STRIKE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            72.216,
+            336.96
+          ],
+          [
+            537.7816162109375,
+            336.96
+          ],
+          [
+            537.7816162109375,
+            381.7330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            72.216,
+            381.7330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL RULE 7.1.A.3",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            131.57999999999998,
+            222.75
+          ],
+          [
+            483.4878845214844,
+            222.75
+          ],
+          [
+            483.4878845214844,
+            238.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            131.57999999999998,
+            238.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            225.216,
+            111.78000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            389.6180725097656,
+            111.78000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            389.6180725097656,
+            126.7330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            225.216,
+            126.7330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "SERVICE LIST",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            263.15999999999997,
+            110.16000000000003
+          ],
+          [
+            352.2082824707031,
+            110.16000000000003
+          ],
+          [
+            352.2082824707031,
+            125.9830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            263.15999999999997,
+            125.9830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            48
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            24
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            60
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            45
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            22
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            77
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            38
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            34
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            79
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            40
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            36
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739209"
+  }
+}

marker2/court-doe-103-v-epstein/EFTA02739214/EFTA02739214.md

@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT  
+SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO. 10-80309-CIV-ZLOCH
+
+JANE DOE NO. 103,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+ORDER OF TRANSFER
+
+JEFFERY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.  
+\_\_\_\_\_/
+
+GOOD CAUSE appearing therefor pursuant to Internal Operating Procedure of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida 2.15.00(C) and subject to consent hereinbelow, it is
+
+ORDERED that the above-numbered cause be and the same is hereby transferred to the calendar of Judge KENNETH A. MARRA for all further proceedings.
+
+DATED in Chambers at Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida, this 23<sup>rd</sup> day of April, 2010.
+
+![]()WILLIAM J. ZLOCH  
+United States District Judge
+
+After reviewing the court file in the above-numbered cause, the undersigned hereby accepts the transfer of said case.
+
+Therefore, it is
+
+ORDERED that all pleadings hereinafter filed shall bear the following case number: Case No. 10-80309-CIV-MARRA thereby indicating the Judge to whom all pleadings should be routed or otherwise brought for attention.
+
+THE FOREGOING transfer is herewith accepted this day of April, 2010. 7 le-
+
+> KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge
+
+Copies furnished:
+
+The Honorable William J. Zloch
+
+All Counsel of Record
+
+Edward Sieber, Case Assignment Administrator

marker2/court-doe-103-v-epstein/EFTA02739214/EFTA02739214.metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,147 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-103-v-epstein/EFTA02739214.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 2,
+  "chars": 1290,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 4.66,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            188.805,
+            69.66
+          ],
+          [
+            396.06000000000006,
+            69.66
+          ],
+          [
+            396.06000000000006,
+            94.77000000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            188.805,
+            94.77000000000001
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "ORDER OF TRANSFER",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            357.92999999999995,
+            200.07
+          ],
+          [
+            487.08000000000004,
+            200.07
+          ],
+          [
+            487.08000000000004,
+            212.22000000000003
+          ],
+          [
+            357.92999999999995,
+            212.22000000000003
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            49
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            24
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "Caption",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            97
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            16
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739214"
+  }
+}

marker2/court-doe-103-v-epstein/EFTA02739216/EFTA02739216.md

@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO. 10-80309-CIV-MARRA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 103,
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendants.
+
+## ORDER REQUIRING COUNSEL TO CONFER, FILE JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT AND FILE JOINT DISCOVERY REPORT
+
+THIS ORDER has been entered upon the filing of the complaint. Plaintiff's counsel is hereby ORDERED to forward to all defendants, upon receipt of either an answer or a motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b), a copy of this order.
+
+It is further ORDERED:
+
+I. Every motion when filed shall be accompanied by a proposed order, except that motions to dismiss and motions for summary judgment need not be accompanied by a proposed order.
+
+2. Pretrial discovery in this case shall be conducted in accord with Local Rule 26.1 and Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
+
+3. Pursuant to Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, unless this action is excluded under Rule 26(aXB), the parties must confer within twenty-one (21) days after the last responding party either files an answer or a motion pursuant to Fed. It. Civ. P. 12(b), whichever is earlier, to consider the nature and basis of their claims and defenses and the possibilities for a prompt settlement or resolution of the case, to make or arrange for the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)( I ), and to develop a proposed discovery plan that indicates the parties' views and
+
+proposals concerning the matters listed in Rule 26(t).
+
+4. The parties are jointly responsible for submitting a written report of this conference outlining the proposed discovery plan within 14 days after the conference.
+
+5. Counsel for the parties shall hold a scheduling conference either at the same time as the discovery conference described in Rule 26(t) or within fourteen (14) calendar days thereafter. See Local Rule 16.1(B).
+
+6. Within fourteen (14) days of the scheduling conference, counsel shall file a joint scheduling report pursuant to Local Rule 16.1(B)(2)&(3). This report shall indicate the proposed month and year for the trial plus the estimated number of trial days required, as well as an indication of whether the trial is to be a jury trial or bench trial.
+
+7. The parties may submit a single report combining the discovery plan report and the scheduling conference report.
+
+8. Failure of counsel or unrepresented parties to file a discovery plan report or joint scheduling report may result in dismissal, default, and the imposition of other sanctions including attorney's fees and costs.
+
+DONE AND SIGNED in at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 29i° day of April, 2010.
+
+> KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge
+
+Copies furnished to:
+
+All counsel

marker2/court-doe-103-v-epstein/EFTA02739216/EFTA02739216.metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,143 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-103-v-epstein/EFTA02739216.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 2,
+  "chars": 2705,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 0.72,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            206.856,
+            57.50999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            405.5581359863281,
+            57.50999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            405.5581359863281,
+            86.9830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            206.856,
+            86.9830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "ORDER REQUIRING COUNSEL TO CONFER, FILE JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT \nAND FILE JOINT DISCOVERY REPORT",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            72.216,
+            269.73
+          ],
+          [
+            540.4690551757812,
+            269.73
+          ],
+          [
+            540.4690551757812,
+            299.6030578613281
+          ],
+          [
+            72.216,
+            299.6030578613281
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            49
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            24
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739216"
+  }
+}

marker2/court-doe-103-v-epstein/EFTA02739218/EFTA02739218.md

@@ -0,0 +1,193 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTIIERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 10-80309-MARRAi
+
+![](_page_0_Picture_3.jpeg)
+
+JANE DOE NO. 103
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## PLAINTIFF'S AGREED MOTION FOR FURTHER EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S AMENDED MOTION TO DISMISS COUNT VI AND FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT AND TO STRIKE
+
+Plaintiff, Jane Doc No. 103, by and through her undersigned counsel, moves this Court for the entry of an order granting a further extension of time to file response to Defendant Epstein's Amended Motion to Dismiss Count VI and for More Definite Statement and to Strike [DE 15], on the following grounds:
+
+- 1. Plaintiff's response to Defendant Epstein's Amended Motion to Dismiss Count VI and for More Definite Statement and to Strike is presently due on May 13, 2010, pursuant to an earlier extension granted by the Court upon an agreed motion [DE 17].
+- 2. The Parties are in the process of resolving this matter, and the subject motion and response will become moot.
+- 3. An extension of one week should be sufficient to allow the Parties time to complete the settlement process, including the filing of the Parties' Stipulation for Dismissal.
+
+CASE NO.: 10-80309-WIZ
+
+WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 103, respectfully requests that this Court grant Plaintiff's Agreed Motion for Further Extension of Time to File a Response to Defendant Epstein's Amended Motion to Dismiss Count VI and for More Definite Statement and to Strike.
+
+# CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL RULE 7.1.A.3
+
+Undersigned counsel conferred with counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein, Robert Critton, Esquire, who advised that we may represent to the Court that he is in agreement with this motion.
+
+DATED thisl 3th day of May, 2010.
+
+Respectfully submitted, PODHURST ORSECIC, P.A. Attorneys for Plainti f f Jane Doe No. 103
+
+By: s/Katherine W. Ezell Robert C. Josefsberg Fla. Bar No. 040856 rjosefsberVapodhurst.com Katherine W. Ezell Fla. Bar No. 114771 kezell@podhurst.com City National Bank Building 25 W. Flagler Street, Suite 800 Miami, FL 33130 Telephone: (305) 358-2800 Facsimile: (305) 358-2382
+
+CASE NO.: 10-80309-WJZ
+
+## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
+
+WE HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 13th day of May, 2010, a copy of the foregoing was served this day on all counsel of record on the attached Service List via e-mail transmission.
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+PODHURST ORSECK, P.A.
+
+Attorneys for Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 103
+
+By: s/Katherine W. Ezel Robert C. Josefsberg Fla. Bar No. 040856 rjosefsberg®podhurst.com Katherine W. Ezell Fla. Bar No. 114771 kezellOpodhurst.com City National Bank Building 25 W. Flagler Street, Suite 800 Miami, FL 33130 Telephone: (305) 358-2800 Facsimile: (305) 358-2382
+
+CASE NO.: 10-80309-WJZ
+
+#### SERVICE LIST
+
+JANE DOE NO. 103 v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN
+
+Case No.: 10-80309
+
+United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
+
+Robert Critton, Esq.
+
+Michael J. Pike, Esq.
+
+Burman, Critton, Luther & Coleman LLP
+
+303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400
+
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+
+Phone: (561) 842-2820/Fax: (561) 515-3148
+
+rcritabc1claw.com
+
+mpike@bclelaw.cpm
+
+Counsel for Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein
+
+Jack Goldberger, Esq.
+
+Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
+
+250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400
+
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+
+Phone: (561) 659-8300/Fax: (561) 835-8691
+
+jagesqebellsouth.net
+
+Co-Counsel for Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein
+
+Bruce E. Reinhart, Esq.
+
+Bruce E. Reinhart, P.A.
+
+250 South Australian Avenue, Suite 1400
+
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+
+Phone: (561) 202-6360/Fax: (561) 828-0983
+
+ecfabrucereinhartlaw.com
+
+Counsel for Co-Defendant,
+
+Jack Scarola, Esq.
+
+Jack P.M, Esq.
+
+Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
+
+2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
+
+West Palm Beach, Florida 33409
+
+Phone: (561) 686-6300/Fax: (561) 383-9456
+
+jsx@searcylaw.eom
+
+CASE NO.: 10-80309-WJZ
+
+iph@searcylaw.com
+
+Counsel for Plaintiff in related Case No. 08-80811
+
+Adam Horowitz, Esq.
+
+Stuart Mermelstein, Esq.
+
+Mennelstein & Horowitz, P.A.
+
+18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218
+
+Miami, FL 33160
+
+Phone: (305) 931-2200/Fax: (305) 931-0877
+
+ahorowitz@.sexabuseattomey.com
+
+. smenneistempsexaouseanorney,com
+
+Counsellor Plaintiffs in Related Cases Nos. 08-80069,08-80119,08-80232,0840380,0840381, 08- 80993, 08-80994
+
+Spencer Todd Kuvin, Esq.
+
+Theodore Jon Leopold, Esq.
+
+Leopold Kuvin, P.A.
+
+2925 PGA Boulevard, Suite 200
+
+Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410
+
+Phone: (561) 515-1400/Fax: (561) 515-1401
+
+skuvin@leopoldkuvin.com
+
+deonold@leopoldkuvin.com
+
+Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-08804
+
+Brad , Esq.
+
+Jaffe, Weissing,
+
+Fistos & Lehrman, P.L.
+
+425 North Andrews Avenue, Suite 2
+
+Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
+
+Phone: (954) 524-2820/Fax: (954) 524-2822
+
+bradepathtojustice.com.
+
+Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 0840893
+
+Isidro Manuel =, Esq.
+
+Elkins & Bochringer
+
+224 Datura Avenue, Suite 900
+
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+
+Phone: (561) 832-8033/Fax: (561) 832-7137
+
+isidrogarcia@bellsouth.net
+
+Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 0840469

marker2/court-doe-103-v-epstein/EFTA02739218/EFTA02739218.metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,340 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-103-v-epstein/EFTA02739218.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 5,
+  "chars": 5013,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 2.08,
+  "image_assets": [
+    "_page_0_Picture_3.jpeg"
+  ],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTIIERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            406.33038330078125,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            406.33038330078125,
+            100.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            100.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "PLAINTIFF'S AGREED MOTION FOR FURTHER EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE \nRESPONSE TO DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S AMENDED MOTION TO DISMISS \nCOUNT VI AND FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT AND TO STRIKE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            67.932,
+            324.81000000000006
+          ],
+          [
+            536.3401489257812,
+            324.81000000000006
+          ],
+          [
+            536.3401489257812,
+            368.9830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            67.932,
+            368.9830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL RULE 7.1.A.3",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            132.192,
+            196.02
+          ],
+          [
+            485.0914306640625,
+            196.02
+          ],
+          [
+            485.0914306640625,
+            212.73248291015625
+          ],
+          [
+            132.192,
+            212.73248291015625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            225.216,
+            111.78000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            390.3902587890625,
+            111.78000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            390.3902587890625,
+            126.363037109375
+          ],
+          [
+            225.216,
+            126.363037109375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "SERVICE LIST",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            263.15999999999997,
+            111.78000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            352.9582824707031,
+            111.78000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            352.9582824707031,
+            125.9830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            263.15999999999997,
+            125.9830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            47
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            24
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Picture",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            45
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            22
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            75
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            38
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            34
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            83
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            41
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            36
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739218"
+  }
+}

marker2/court-doe-103-v-epstein/EFTA02739223/EFTA02739223.md

@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: I 0-CV-80309-MARRA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 103,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## FINAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
+
+THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the parties' Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice (DE ), filed May , 2010. The Court has reviewed the Stipulation, the pertinent portions of the record, and is otherwise advised in the premises. In accordance with the parties' Stipulation, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:
+
+- 1. The above-styled action is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
+- 2. All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT.
+- 3. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the parties' settlement.
+- 4. The Clerk shall CLOSE THIS CASE.
+
+DONE AND ORDERED in at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida this day of May, 2010.
+
+> KENNETH A. MARRA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
+
+Conies furnished to: All counsel of record

marker2/court-doe-103-v-epstein/EFTA02739223/EFTA02739223.metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-103-v-epstein/EFTA02739223.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 1,
+  "chars": 942,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 0.7,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            404.0390930175781,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            404.0390930175781,
+            100.18359375
+          ],
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            100.18359375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "FINAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            163.404,
+            298.08
+          ],
+          [
+            448.1226806640625,
+            298.08
+          ],
+          [
+            448.1226806640625,
+            313.8630676269531
+          ],
+          [
+            163.404,
+            313.8630676269531
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            52
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739223"
+  }
+}

marker2/court-doe-103-v-epstein/EFTA02739224/EFTA02739224.md

@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 10-CV-80309-MARRAi
+
+JANE DOE NO. 103,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
+
+Plaintiff, JANE DOE NO. 103, and Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, (collectively, "Parties"), by and through their undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rule 41(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby stipulate to the dismissal of this action with prejudice. The Parties further stipulate that the Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Parties' settlement.
+
+Dated this lgtay of May, 2010.
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTHER & COLEMAN LLP Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein
+
+Robert tton Fla. B o. 224162 rcrit@bciclaw.com 303 Banyan Blvd., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Telephone: (561) 842-2820 Facsimile: (561) 515-3148
+
+PODHURST ORSECK, P.A. Attorneys for Jane Doe No. 103
+
+> By: 4ecji-tvatt La • Eta\_ !Catherine W. Ezell Fla. Bar No. 114771 kezell®podhurst.com City National Bank Building 25 W. Flagler Street, Suite 800 Miami, FL 33130 Telephone: (305) 358-2800 Facsimile: (305) 358-2382
+
+## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
+
+WE HEREBY CERTIFY that, on this 'getClay of May, 2010, we electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. We also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record identified on the attached Service List either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those counsel or parties who are not authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing.
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+PODHURST ORSECK, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiff
+
+By: s/Katherine W. Ezell Robert C. Josefsberg Fla. Bar No. 040856 riosefsbenz®nodhurst.com Katherine W. Ezell Fla. Bar No. 114771 kezell@podhurst.com City National Bank Building 25 W. Flagler Street, Suite 800 Miami, FL 33130 Telephone: (305) 358-2800 Facsimile: (305) 358-2382

marker2/court-doe-103-v-epstein/EFTA02739224/EFTA02739224.metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,170 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-103-v-epstein/EFTA02739224.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 2,
+  "chars": 2015,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 0.88,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            205.02,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            405.18707275390625,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            405.18707275390625,
+            100.10302734375
+          ],
+          [
+            205.02,
+            100.10302734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            163.404,
+            292.40999999999997
+          ],
+          [
+            448.551513671875,
+            292.40999999999997
+          ],
+          [
+            448.551513671875,
+            307.863037109375
+          ],
+          [
+            163.404,
+            307.863037109375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            223.38,
+            98.82
+          ],
+          [
+            388.5411682128906,
+            98.82
+          ],
+          [
+            388.5411682128906,
+            114.11248779296875
+          ],
+          [
+            223.38,
+            114.11248779296875
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            78
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            39
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            13
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            47
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            24
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739224"
+  }
+}