robbd commited on
Commit
5aea755
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): cda5c9e

MEMY-1805 marker2 court-doe-3-v-epstein (salt 4090): 390/390

Browse files
This view is limited to 50 files because it contains too many changes.   See raw diff
Files changed (50) hide show
  1. marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739227/EFTA02739227.md +169 -0
  2. marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739227/EFTA02739227.metadata.json +480 -0
  3. marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739233/EFTA02739233.md +45 -0
  4. marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739233/EFTA02739233.metadata.json +138 -0
  5. marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739233/_page_0_Picture_22.jpeg +3 -0
  6. marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739234/EFTA02739234.md +43 -0
  7. marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739234/EFTA02739234.metadata.json +120 -0
  8. marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739236/EFTA02739236.md +90 -0
  9. marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739236/EFTA02739236.metadata.json +50 -0
  10. marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739237/EFTA02739237.md +112 -0
  11. marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739237/EFTA02739237.metadata.json +154 -0
  12. marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739237/_page_0_Picture_44.jpeg +3 -0
  13. marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739237/_page_1_Picture_124.jpeg +3 -0
  14. marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739239/EFTA02739239.md +21 -0
  15. marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739239/EFTA02739239.metadata.json +109 -0
  16. marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739240/EFTA02739240.md +49 -0
  17. marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739240/EFTA02739240.metadata.json +245 -0
  18. marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739240/_page_1_Picture_9.jpeg +3 -0
  19. marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739243/EFTA02739243.md +23 -0
  20. marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739243/EFTA02739243.metadata.json +109 -0
  21. marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739244/EFTA02739244.md +29 -0
  22. marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739244/EFTA02739244.metadata.json +147 -0
  23. marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739246/EFTA02739246.md +135 -0
  24. marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739246/EFTA02739246.metadata.json +811 -0
  25. marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739257/EFTA02739257.md +77 -0
  26. marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739257/EFTA02739257.metadata.json +410 -0
  27. marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739263/EFTA02739263.md +81 -0
  28. marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739263/EFTA02739263.metadata.json +319 -0
  29. marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739267/EFTA02739267.md +77 -0
  30. marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739267/EFTA02739267.metadata.json +376 -0
  31. marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739272/EFTA02739272.md +183 -0
  32. marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739272/EFTA02739272.metadata.json +199 -0
  33. marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739276/EFTA02739276.md +41 -0
  34. marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739276/EFTA02739276.metadata.json +204 -0
  35. marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739279/EFTA02739279.md +35 -0
  36. marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739279/EFTA02739279.metadata.json +231 -0
  37. marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739282/EFTA02739282.md +23 -0
  38. marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739282/EFTA02739282.metadata.json +132 -0
  39. marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739283/EFTA02739283.md +47 -0
  40. marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739283/EFTA02739283.metadata.json +285 -0
  41. marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739287/EFTA02739287.md +97 -0
  42. marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739287/EFTA02739287.metadata.json +162 -0
  43. marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739289/EFTA02739289.md +35 -0
  44. marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739289/EFTA02739289.metadata.json +181 -0
  45. marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739292/EFTA02739292.md +55 -0
  46. marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739292/EFTA02739292.metadata.json +326 -0
  47. marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739297/EFTA02739297.md +57 -0
  48. marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739297/EFTA02739297.metadata.json +233 -0
  49. marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739297/_page_0_Picture_67.jpeg +3 -0
  50. marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739301/EFTA02739301.md +65 -0
marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739227/EFTA02739227.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,169 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ JANE DOE NO. 3,
2
+
3
+ Plaintiff,
4
+
5
+ vs.
6
+
7
+ JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
8
+
9
+ Defendant.
10
+
11
+ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
12
+
13
+ CASE NO.:
14
+
15
+ 08-CV-80232-Marra-
16
+
17
+ STEVEN N. LARIMORE CLERK U.5. DIST. CT. S.O. Of FLA. • MIAMI
18
+
19
+ ### COMPLAINT
20
+
21
+ Plaintiff, Jane Doe No.3 ("Jane" or "Jane Doe"), brings this Complaint against Jeffrey Epstein, as follows:
22
+
23
+ ## Parties, Jurisdiction and Venue
24
+
25
+ - 1. Jane Doe is acitizen and resident of the State of Florida, and is sui juris.
26
+ - 2. This Complaint is brought under afictitious name to protect the identity of the Plaintiff because this Complaint makes sensitive allegations of sexual assault and abuse upon her when she was <sup>a</sup>minor.
27
+ - 3. Defendant Jeffrey Epstein is acitizen and resident of the State of New York.
28
+ - 4. This is an action for damages in excess of \$50 million.
29
+ - 5. This Court has jurisdiction of this action and the claims set forth herein pursuant to <sup>28</sup> U.S.C. §1332(a), as the matter in controversy (i) exceeds \$75,000, exclusive of interest and costs; and (ii) is between citizens of different states.
30
+ - 6. This Court has venue of this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1391(a) as <sup>a</sup>substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred in this District.
31
+
32
+ # Factual Allegations
33
+
34
+ 7. At all relevant times, Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") was an adult male, <sup>52</sup> years old. Epstein is a financier and money manager with a secret clientele limited exclusively to billionaires. He is himself a man of tremendous wealth, power and influence. He maintains his principal home in New York and also owns residences in New Mexico, St... and Palm Beach, FL. The allegations herein concern Epstein's conduct while at his lavish estate in Palm Beach.
35
+
36
+ 8. Upon information and belief, Epstein has a sexual preference and obsession for underage minor girls. He engaged in aplan and scheme in which he gained access to primarily economically disadvantaged minor girls in his home, sexually assaulted these girls, and then gave them money. In or about 2004-2005, Jane Doe, then 16 years old, fell into Epstein's trap and became one of his victims.
37
+
38
+ 9. Upon information and belief, Jeffrey Epstein carried out his scheme and assaulted girls in Florida, New York and on his private island, known as Little St. James, in St
39
+
40
+ 10. An integral player in Epstein's Florida scheme was a Palm Beach Community College student from Loxahatchee, Florida. She recruited girls ostensibly to give <sup>a</sup> wealthy man a massage for monetary compensation in his Palm Beach mansion. Under Epstein's plan, would be contacted when Epstein was planning to be at his Palm Beach residence or soon after he had arrived there. Epstein or someone on his behalf directed to bring one or more underage girls to the residence. , upon information and belief, generally sought out economically disadvantaged underage girls from Loxahatchee and surrounding areas who would be enticed by the money being offered - generally \$200 to \$300 per "massage" session - and who were perceived as less likely to complain to authorities or have credibility if allegations of improper conduct were made. This was an important element of Epstein's plan.
41
+
42
+ 11. Epstein's plan and scheme reflected a particular pattern and method. Upon arrival at Epstein's mansion, the victim would be brought to the kitchen. She would then be led up <sup>a</sup>flight of stairs to abedroom that contained a massage table in addition to other furnishings. Once the girl was alone in this room, Epstein would enter wearing only atowel to cover his private area. He then would lay down on the massage table and perform one or more lewd, lascivious and sexual acts, including masturbation and touching the girl sexually.
43
+
44
+ 12. Consistent with the foregoing plan and scheme, recruited Jane Doe to give Epstein a massage for monetary compensation. brought Jane to Epstein's mansion in Palm Beach. Jane was led up the flight of stairs to the room with the massage table. She was alone in the room when Epstein arrived wearing atowel to cover his private parts. He laid down on the massage table, and sexually assaulted Jane Doe during the massage. In addition, Jeffrey Epstein masturbated during the massage.
45
+
46
+ 13. After Epstein had completed the assault, he left the room. Jane was then able to leave the room and go back down the stairs. She then met again who brought Jane home. Jane was paid \$200 by Epstein. was also paid by Epstein for bringing Jane to him.
47
+
48
+ 14. As aresult of this encounter with Epstein, the 16-year old Jane experienced trauma, shock, confusion, shame, humiliation and embarrassment.
49
+
50
+ ### COUNT I Sexual Assault
51
+
52
+ 15. Plaintiff Jane Doe repeats and realleges paragraphs I through 14 above.
53
+
54
+ 16. Epstein tortiously assaulted Jane Doe sexually in or about 2004-2005. Epstein's acts were intentional, unlawful, offensive and harmful.
55
+
56
+ 17. Epstein's plan and scheme in which he committed such acts upon Jane Doe were done willfully and maliciously.
57
+
58
+ IS. This sexual assault was in violation of Chapter 800 of the Florida Statutes, which recognizes as <sup>a</sup>crime the lewd and lascivious acts committed by Epstein upon Jane.
59
+
60
+ 19. As adirect and proximate result of Epstein's assault on Jane, she has suffered and will continue to suffer severe and permanent traumatic injuries, including mental, psychological and emotional damages.
61
+
62
+ WHEREFORE, PlaintiffJane Doe, demands judgment against Defendant Jeffrey Epstein for compensatory damages, punitive damages, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper.
63
+
64
+ ## COUNT II Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress
65
+
66
+ 20. Plaintiffs Jane Doe repeats and realleges paragraphs 1 through 14 above.
67
+
68
+ 21. Epstein's conduct was intentional or reckless.
69
+
70
+ 22. Epstein's conduct was outrageous, going beyond all bounds of decency.
71
+
72
+ 23. Epstein's conduct caused severe emotional distress to Jane Doe. Epstein knew or had reason to know that his intentional and outrageous conduct would cause emotional trauma and damage to Jane Doe.
73
+
74
+ 24. As adirect and proximate result of Epstein's intentional or reckless conduct, Jane Doe has suffered and will continue to suffer severe mental anguish and pain.
75
+
76
+ WHEREFORE, PlaintiffJane Doe demands judgment against Defendant Jeffrey Epstein for compensatory damages, costs, punitive damages, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper.
77
+
78
+ # JURY TRIAL DEMAND
79
+
80
+ Plaintiffs demand a jury trial in this action.
81
+
82
+ Dated: March A ., 2008
83
+
84
+ Respectfully submitted,
85
+
86
+ HERMAN & MERMELSTE1N, P.A.
87
+
88
+ Attorneys for Plaintiffs
89
+
90
+ 18205 Biscayne Blvd.
91
+
92
+ Suite 2218
93
+
94
+ Miami, Florida 33160
95
+
96
+ Tel: 305-931-2200
97
+
98
+ Fax: 305-931-0877
99
+
100
+ By
101
+
102
+ Jeffrey M. Herman
103
+
104
+ ihennanehermanlaw.corn
105
+
106
+ Florida Bar No. 521647
107
+
108
+ Stuart S. Mermelstein
109
+
110
+ smermelstein@hermanlaw.com
111
+
112
+ Florida Bar No. 947245
113
+
114
+ Adam D. Horowitz
115
+
116
+ Florida Bar No. 376980
117
+
118
+ ahorowitzehermanlaw.com
119
+
120
+ The JS-44 civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replace nor supplement the filing, and service of pleading or other papers as required by law, except as provided bylocal rules of court This form, approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September 1974, is required for the use of the Clerk of the Court for the purpose of initiating the civil docket sheet. (SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON THE REVERSE OF THE FORM.)
121
+
122
+ 1(a) PLAINTIFFS JANE DOE NO. 3,
123
+
124
+ (b) COUNTY OF RESIDENCE OF FIRST LISTED PLAINTIFF PALM BEACH COUNTY (EXCEPT IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES)
125
+
126
+ DEFENDANTS JEFFREY EPSTEIN
127
+
128
+ COUNTY OF RESIDENCE OF FIRST LISTED DEFENDANT NEW YORK (IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES ONLY)
129
+
130
+ (c) ATTORNEYS (FIRM NAME, ADDRESS, AND TELEPHONE NUMBER) Herman & Mermeistein, PA., 18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218, Miami, FL 33160, (305) 931-2200
131
+
132
+ (d) CIRCLE COUNTY WHERE ACTION AROSE: PALM BEACH
133
+
134
+ ## II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION (PLACE AN X ONE BOX ONLY)
135
+
136
+ - O 1 U.S. Government 0 3. Federal Question Plaintiff (D S. Government NO a Pally) O 2. U.S Government X 4. Oiveralty Defendant (Indicate Citizenship of Parties in Item
137
+ - III)
138
+
139
+ ATTORNEYS (IF KNOWN)
140
+
141
+ 61:0 PrA/ 2n2 32 - 1O9O1-A1s
142
+
143
+ III. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES
144
+
145
+ PLACE AN X IN ONE BOX FOR PLAINTIFF (For Diversity Case Only) AND ONE FOR DEFENDANT PTF DEF PTF DEF Incorporated of Principal Place of O 4 O <sup>4</sup>
146
+
147
+ Citizen of This State X1 01 Buarness in This Stale Cazon of Another State O 2 x 2 Citizen or Subject of a Foreigl Country 0 3 O <sup>3</sup> Incorporated and Rrtnc/pal Place of O 5 O 5 Business in Another State Foreign Nation O 6 CI <sup>6</sup>
148
+
149
+ #### IV. CAUSE OF ACTION (CITE THE U.S. CIVIL STATUTE UNDER WHICH YOU ARE FILING AND WRITE A BRIEF STATEMENT OF CAUSE. DO NOT CITE JURISDICTIONAL STATUTES UNLESS DIVERSITY.) DIVERSITY ACTION UNDER 28 U.S.C. §1332(a) FOR SEXUAL ASSAULT
150
+
151
+ IVa. j\_ days estimated (for both sides) to try entire case
152
+
153
+ V. NATURE OF SUIT (PLACE AN X IN ONE BOX ONLY)
154
+
155
+ | A CONTRACT | A TORTS | B FORFEITURE PENALTY | A BANKRUPTCY | A OTHER STATUS |
156
+ |---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
157
+ | <ul style="list-style-type: none; padding-left: 0;"> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 110 Insurance</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 120 Marine</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 130 Act</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 140 Negotiable Instrument</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 150 Recovery of Overpayment &amp; Enforcement of Judgment</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 151 Medicare Act</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 152 Recovery of Defaulted Student Loans (Excl. Veterans) B</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 153 Recovery of Overpayment of Veteran's Benefits B</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 160 Stockholder's Suits</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 190 Other Contract</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 195 Contract Product Liability</li> </ul> | <p><b>PERSONAL INJURY</b></p> <p><input type="checkbox"/> 310 Airplane<br/> <input type="checkbox"/> 315 Airplane Product Liability<br/> <input type="checkbox"/> 320 Assault, Libel &amp; Slander<br/> <input type="checkbox"/> 330 Federal Employers' Liability<br/> <input type="checkbox"/> 335 Damage<br/> <input type="checkbox"/> 345 Vehicle Product Liability<br/> <input type="checkbox"/> 350 Motor Vehicle<br/> <input type="checkbox"/> 355 Motor Vehicle Product Liability<br/> <input checked="" type="checkbox"/> 360 Other Personal Injury</p> <p><b>PERSONAL PROPERTY</b></p> <p><input type="checkbox"/> 372 Other Fraud<br/> <input type="checkbox"/> 371 Truth in Lending B<br/> <input type="checkbox"/> 380 Other Personnel Property Damage<br/> <input type="checkbox"/> 385 Property Damage Product Liability</p> | <ul style="list-style-type: none; padding-left: 0;"> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 610 Agriculture</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 620 Other Food &amp; Drug</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 625 Drug Related Seizure of Property 21 USC 881</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 630 Liquor Laws</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 640 R.R. &amp; Truck</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 650 Airline Regs</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 660 Occupational Safety/Health</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 690 Other</li> </ul> | <ul style="list-style-type: none; padding-left: 0;"> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 422 Appeal 28 USC 158</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 423 Withdrawal 28 USC 157</li> </ul> <p><b>A PROPERTY RIGHTS</b></p> <p><input type="checkbox"/> 820 Copyrights<br/> <input type="checkbox"/> 830 Patent<br/> <input type="checkbox"/> 840 Trademark</p> | <ul style="list-style-type: none; padding-left: 0;"> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 400 Status Reappointment</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 410 Antitrust</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 430 Banks and Banking</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 450 Commerce/ICC Rates/etc. B</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 480 Deportation</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 470 Racketeer Influenced and Comput Organizations</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 810 Selective Service</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 850 Securities/Commodities/Exchange</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 875 Customer Challenge</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 12USC3410</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 891 Agricultural Acts</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 862 Economic Stabilization Act</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 863 Environmental Matters</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 864 Energy Allocation Act</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 865 Freedom of Information Act</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 900 Appeal of Fee Determination Under Equal Access to Justice</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 950 Constitutionality of State Statutes</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 890 Other Statutory Actions* "A or B"</li> </ul> |
158
+ | A REAL PROPERTY | A CIVIL RIGHTS | B PRISONER PETITIONS | A LABOR | A FEDERAL TAX SUITS |
159
+ | <ul style="list-style-type: none; padding-left: 0;"> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 210 Land Condemnation</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 220 Foreclosure B</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 230 Rent Lease &amp; Ejectment</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 240 Torts to Land</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 245 Tort Product Liability</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 260 All Other Real Property</li> </ul> | <ul style="list-style-type: none; padding-left: 0;"> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 441 Voting</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 442 Employment</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 443 Housing/Accommodations</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 444 Welfare</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 440 Other Civil Rights</li> </ul> | | | |
160
+
161
+ VI. ORIGIN <sup>x</sup>1. Original 0 2. Removed from 0 3. Remanded from 0 4. Refilled 0 6. Multidistrict Litigation 0 7. Appeal to District Judge from Proceeding State Court Appellate Court 0 5. Transferred from another district (Specify) Magistrate Judgment
162
+
163
+ VII. REQUESTED IN COMPLAINT CHECK IF THIS IS A O CLASS ACTION DEMAND O Check conplaint: JURY DEMAND: O UNDER F.R.C.P. <sup>23</sup>
164
+
165
+ VIII. RELATED (See Instructions): (SEE ATTACHED) CASE(S) IF ANY JUDGE KENNETH A. MARRA Jane Doe 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein DOCKET NUMBER 08-CV-80119-MARRAIMM
166
+
167
+ DATE 3 - 4 -.4) Y SIGNATURE OF ATTORNEY OF RECORD
168
+
169
+ Date Pald: Wfp: 54/az/col
marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739227/EFTA02739227.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,480 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739227.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 6,
15
+ "chars": 27633,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 9.29,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "COMPLAINT",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 268.755,
27
+ 297.27
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 347.3941955566406,
31
+ 297.27
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 347.3941955566406,
35
+ 311.04
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 268.755,
39
+ 311.04
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "Parties, Jurisdiction and Venue",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 225.70499999999998,
50
+ 383.13
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 392.5243835449219,
54
+ 383.13
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 392.5243835449219,
58
+ 397.6299133300781
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 225.70499999999998,
62
+ 397.6299133300781
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ },
66
+ {
67
+ "title": "Factual Allegations",
68
+ "heading_level": null,
69
+ "page_id": 1,
70
+ "polygon": [
71
+ [
72
+ 253.38,
73
+ 84.24
74
+ ],
75
+ [
76
+ 360.4727478027344,
77
+ 84.24
78
+ ],
79
+ [
80
+ 360.4727478027344,
81
+ 99.4151611328125
82
+ ],
83
+ [
84
+ 253.38,
85
+ 99.4151611328125
86
+ ]
87
+ ]
88
+ },
89
+ {
90
+ "title": "COUNT I \nSexual Assault",
91
+ "heading_level": null,
92
+ "page_id": 2,
93
+ "polygon": [
94
+ [
95
+ 267.525,
96
+ 596.16
97
+ ],
98
+ [
99
+ 347.5867614746094,
100
+ 596.16
101
+ ],
102
+ [
103
+ 347.5867614746094,
104
+ 623.7
105
+ ],
106
+ [
107
+ 267.525,
108
+ 623.7
109
+ ]
110
+ ]
111
+ },
112
+ {
113
+ "title": "COUNT II \nIntentional Infliction of Emotional Distress",
114
+ "heading_level": null,
115
+ "page_id": 3,
116
+ "polygon": [
117
+ [
118
+ 194.95499999999998,
119
+ 381.51
120
+ ],
121
+ [
122
+ 424.44537353515625,
123
+ 381.51
124
+ ],
125
+ [
126
+ 424.44537353515625,
127
+ 410.6700000000001
128
+ ],
129
+ [
130
+ 194.95499999999998,
131
+ 410.6700000000001
132
+ ]
133
+ ]
134
+ },
135
+ {
136
+ "title": "JURY TRIAL DEMAND",
137
+ "heading_level": null,
138
+ "page_id": 4,
139
+ "polygon": [
140
+ [
141
+ 236.77499999999998,
142
+ 112.59
143
+ ],
144
+ [
145
+ 373.58453369140625,
146
+ 112.59
147
+ ],
148
+ [
149
+ 373.58453369140625,
150
+ 128.2230224609375
151
+ ],
152
+ [
153
+ 236.77499999999998,
154
+ 128.2230224609375
155
+ ]
156
+ ]
157
+ },
158
+ {
159
+ "title": "Case 9:08-cv-80232-KAM DocuabIll COV&PcISEHREID Docket 03/05/2008 Page 6 of 6",
160
+ "heading_level": null,
161
+ "page_id": 5,
162
+ "polygon": [
163
+ [
164
+ 58.91366958618164,
165
+ 12.072021484375
166
+ ],
167
+ [
168
+ 559.6500000000001,
169
+ 12.072021484375
170
+ ],
171
+ [
172
+ 559.6500000000001,
173
+ 28.35
174
+ ],
175
+ [
176
+ 58.91366958618164,
177
+ 28.35
178
+ ]
179
+ ]
180
+ },
181
+ {
182
+ "title": "II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION \n(PLACE AN X ONE BOX ONLY)",
183
+ "heading_level": null,
184
+ "page_id": 5,
185
+ "polygon": [
186
+ [
187
+ 20.145967483520508,
188
+ 186.3
189
+ ],
190
+ [
191
+ 138.375,
192
+ 186.3
193
+ ],
194
+ [
195
+ 138.375,
196
+ 214.64999999999998
197
+ ],
198
+ [
199
+ 20.145967483520508,
200
+ 214.64999999999998
201
+ ]
202
+ ]
203
+ },
204
+ {
205
+ "title": "IV. CAUSE OF ACTION (CITE THE U.S. CIVIL STATUTE UNDER WHICH YOU ARE FILING AND WRITE A BRIEF STATEMENT OF CAUSE. \nDO NOT CITE JURISDICTIONAL STATUTES UNLESS DIVERSITY.) \nDIVERSITY ACTION UNDER 28 U.S.C. \u00a71332(a) FOR SEXUAL ASSAULT",
206
+ "heading_level": null,
207
+ "page_id": 5,
208
+ "polygon": [
209
+ [
210
+ 21.116561889648438,
211
+ 280.3887023925781
212
+ ],
213
+ [
214
+ 568.875,
215
+ 280.3887023925781
216
+ ],
217
+ [
218
+ 568.875,
219
+ 311.85
220
+ ],
221
+ [
222
+ 21.116561889648438,
223
+ 311.85
224
+ ]
225
+ ]
226
+ }
227
+ ],
228
+ "page_stats": [
229
+ {
230
+ "page_id": 0,
231
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
232
+ "block_counts": [
233
+ [
234
+ "Span",
235
+ 272
236
+ ],
237
+ [
238
+ "Line",
239
+ 33
240
+ ],
241
+ [
242
+ "Text",
243
+ 13
244
+ ],
245
+ [
246
+ "ListItem",
247
+ 6
248
+ ],
249
+ [
250
+ "PageFooter",
251
+ 3
252
+ ],
253
+ [
254
+ "PageHeader",
255
+ 2
256
+ ],
257
+ [
258
+ "SectionHeader",
259
+ 2
260
+ ],
261
+ [
262
+ "ListGroup",
263
+ 1
264
+ ]
265
+ ],
266
+ "block_metadata": {
267
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
268
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
269
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
270
+ "previous_text": "",
271
+ "previous_type": "",
272
+ "previous_order": 0
273
+ }
274
+ },
275
+ {
276
+ "page_id": 1,
277
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
278
+ "block_counts": [
279
+ [
280
+ "Span",
281
+ 359
282
+ ],
283
+ [
284
+ "Line",
285
+ 27
286
+ ],
287
+ [
288
+ "PageFooter",
289
+ 5
290
+ ],
291
+ [
292
+ "Text",
293
+ 4
294
+ ],
295
+ [
296
+ "PageHeader",
297
+ 1
298
+ ],
299
+ [
300
+ "SectionHeader",
301
+ 1
302
+ ]
303
+ ],
304
+ "block_metadata": {
305
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
306
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
307
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
308
+ "previous_text": "",
309
+ "previous_type": "",
310
+ "previous_order": 0
311
+ }
312
+ },
313
+ {
314
+ "page_id": 2,
315
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
316
+ "block_counts": [
317
+ [
318
+ "Span",
319
+ 365
320
+ ],
321
+ [
322
+ "Line",
323
+ 28
324
+ ],
325
+ [
326
+ "Text",
327
+ 7
328
+ ],
329
+ [
330
+ "PageFooter",
331
+ 5
332
+ ],
333
+ [
334
+ "PageHeader",
335
+ 1
336
+ ],
337
+ [
338
+ "SectionHeader",
339
+ 1
340
+ ]
341
+ ],
342
+ "block_metadata": {
343
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
344
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
345
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
346
+ "previous_text": "",
347
+ "previous_type": "",
348
+ "previous_order": 0
349
+ }
350
+ },
351
+ {
352
+ "page_id": 3,
353
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
354
+ "block_counts": [
355
+ [
356
+ "Span",
357
+ 294
358
+ ],
359
+ [
360
+ "Line",
361
+ 27
362
+ ],
363
+ [
364
+ "Text",
365
+ 10
366
+ ],
367
+ [
368
+ "PageFooter",
369
+ 5
370
+ ],
371
+ [
372
+ "PageHeader",
373
+ 1
374
+ ],
375
+ [
376
+ "SectionHeader",
377
+ 1
378
+ ]
379
+ ],
380
+ "block_metadata": {
381
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
382
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
383
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
384
+ "previous_text": "",
385
+ "previous_type": "",
386
+ "previous_order": 0
387
+ }
388
+ },
389
+ {
390
+ "page_id": 4,
391
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
392
+ "block_counts": [
393
+ [
394
+ "Span",
395
+ 58
396
+ ],
397
+ [
398
+ "Line",
399
+ 28
400
+ ],
401
+ [
402
+ "Text",
403
+ 21
404
+ ],
405
+ [
406
+ "PageFooter",
407
+ 5
408
+ ],
409
+ [
410
+ "PageHeader",
411
+ 1
412
+ ],
413
+ [
414
+ "SectionHeader",
415
+ 1
416
+ ]
417
+ ],
418
+ "block_metadata": {
419
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
420
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
421
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
422
+ "previous_text": "",
423
+ "previous_type": "",
424
+ "previous_order": 0
425
+ }
426
+ },
427
+ {
428
+ "page_id": 5,
429
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
430
+ "block_counts": [
431
+ [
432
+ "Span",
433
+ 1057
434
+ ],
435
+ [
436
+ "Line",
437
+ 183
438
+ ],
439
+ [
440
+ "Text",
441
+ 20
442
+ ],
443
+ [
444
+ "SectionHeader",
445
+ 3
446
+ ],
447
+ [
448
+ "PageFooter",
449
+ 2
450
+ ],
451
+ [
452
+ "ListItem",
453
+ 2
454
+ ],
455
+ [
456
+ "PageHeader",
457
+ 1
458
+ ],
459
+ [
460
+ "ListGroup",
461
+ 1
462
+ ],
463
+ [
464
+ "Table",
465
+ 1
466
+ ]
467
+ ],
468
+ "block_metadata": {
469
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
470
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
471
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
472
+ "previous_text": "",
473
+ "previous_type": "",
474
+ "previous_order": 0
475
+ }
476
+ }
477
+ ],
478
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739227"
479
+ }
480
+ }
marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739233/EFTA02739233.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ AO (Rev. 10/93) Summons in a Civil Action
2
+
3
+ ## United States District Court
4
+
5
+ Southern DISTRICT OF Florida
6
+
7
+ ## SUMMONS
8
+
9
+ JANE DOE NO. 3,
10
+
11
+ Plaintiff,
12
+
13
+ vs.
14
+
15
+ JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
16
+
17
+ Defendant.
18
+
19
+ TO: JEFFREY EPSTEIN, individually:
20
+
21
+ 9 East 71st Street New York, NY 10021 CASE NO. 08-m9-80232-Marra-a=
22
+
23
+ YOU ARE HEREBY SUMMONED and required to serve upon PLAINTIFF'S ATTORNEY,
24
+
25
+ Jeffrey M. Herman, Esq.
26
+
27
+ Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq.
28
+
29
+ Herman & Memtelstein, P.A.
30
+
31
+ <sup>18205</sup>Biscayne Boulevard, Suite <sup>2218</sup>
32
+
33
+ Miami, Florida 33160
34
+
35
+ (305) 931-2200
36
+
37
+ an answer to the complaint which is herewith served upon you, within 20 days after service of this summons upon you, exclusive of the day of service. If you fail to do so, judgment by default will be taken against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. You must also file your answer with the Clerk of this Court within areasonable period of time after service.
38
+
39
+ ![](_page_0_Picture_22.jpeg)
40
+
41
+ Steven M. Larimore Clerk of Court
42
+
43
+ ## SUMMONS DATE
44
+
45
+ si Vernice Deputy Clerk U.S. District Courts March 5, 2008
marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739233/EFTA02739233.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,138 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739233.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 1,
15
+ "chars": 1050,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 1.16,
17
+ "image_assets": [
18
+ "_page_0_Picture_22.jpeg"
19
+ ],
20
+ "marker_metadata": {
21
+ "table_of_contents": [
22
+ {
23
+ "title": "United States District Court",
24
+ "heading_level": null,
25
+ "page_id": 0,
26
+ "polygon": [
27
+ [
28
+ 134.07,
29
+ 46.17
30
+ ],
31
+ [
32
+ 474.1302185058594,
33
+ 46.17
34
+ ],
35
+ [
36
+ 474.1302185058594,
37
+ 73.25286865234375
38
+ ],
39
+ [
40
+ 134.07,
41
+ 73.25286865234375
42
+ ]
43
+ ]
44
+ },
45
+ {
46
+ "title": "SUMMONS",
47
+ "heading_level": null,
48
+ "page_id": 0,
49
+ "polygon": [
50
+ [
51
+ 258.91499999999996,
52
+ 98.82
53
+ ],
54
+ [
55
+ 344.02789306640625,
56
+ 98.82
57
+ ],
58
+ [
59
+ 344.02789306640625,
60
+ 115.33349609375
61
+ ],
62
+ [
63
+ 258.91499999999996,
64
+ 115.33349609375
65
+ ]
66
+ ]
67
+ },
68
+ {
69
+ "title": "SUMMONS DATE",
70
+ "heading_level": null,
71
+ "page_id": 0,
72
+ "polygon": [
73
+ [
74
+ 158.055,
75
+ 526.5
76
+ ],
77
+ [
78
+ 330.22332763671875,
79
+ 526.5
80
+ ],
81
+ [
82
+ 330.22332763671875,
83
+ 548.3770141601562
84
+ ],
85
+ [
86
+ 158.055,
87
+ 548.3770141601562
88
+ ]
89
+ ]
90
+ }
91
+ ],
92
+ "page_stats": [
93
+ {
94
+ "page_id": 0,
95
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
96
+ "block_counts": [
97
+ [
98
+ "Span",
99
+ 214
100
+ ],
101
+ [
102
+ "Line",
103
+ 32
104
+ ],
105
+ [
106
+ "Text",
107
+ 22
108
+ ],
109
+ [
110
+ "SectionHeader",
111
+ 3
112
+ ],
113
+ [
114
+ "PageHeader",
115
+ 1
116
+ ],
117
+ [
118
+ "Picture",
119
+ 1
120
+ ],
121
+ [
122
+ "PageFooter",
123
+ 1
124
+ ]
125
+ ],
126
+ "block_metadata": {
127
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
128
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
129
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
130
+ "previous_text": "",
131
+ "previous_type": "",
132
+ "previous_order": 0
133
+ }
134
+ }
135
+ ],
136
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739233"
137
+ }
138
+ }
marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739233/_page_0_Picture_22.jpeg ADDED

Git LFS Details

  • SHA256: dcb0649ea2042e3fbd1adfdfbc0c1f5e7fdc37426829e0a4baf954af85031faf
  • Pointer size: 130 Bytes
  • Size of remote file: 15.7 kB
marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739234/EFTA02739234.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
2
+
3
+ CASE NO.08-80232-CIV-MARRA
4
+
5
+ JANE DOE NO. 3,
6
+
7
+ Plaintiff, vs.
8
+
9
+ JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
10
+
11
+ Defendant.
12
+
13
+ ORDER REQUIRING COUNSEL TO CONFER, FILE JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT AND FILE JOINT DISCOVERY REPORT
14
+
15
+ THIS ORDER has been entered upon the filing of the complaint. Plaintiff's counsel is hereby ORDERED to forward to all defendants, upon receipt of either an answer or a motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. I2(b), a copy of this order.
16
+
17
+ It is further ORDERED:
18
+
19
+ I. Every motion when filed shall be accompanied by a proposed order, except that motions to dismiss and motions for summary judgment need not be accompanied by a proposed order.
20
+
21
+ 2. Pretrial discovery in this case shall be conducted in accord with Local Rule 16.1 and Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
22
+
23
+ 3. Pursuant to Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, unless this action is excluded under Rule 26(a)(I)(E), the parties must confer within twenty-one (21) days after the last responding party either files an answer or a motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b), whichever is earlier, to consider the nature and basis of their claims and defenses and the possibilities for a prompt settlement or resolution of the case, to make or arrange for the
24
+
25
+ disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1), and to develop a proposed discovery plan that indicates the parties' views and proposals concerning the matters listed in Rule 26(f).
26
+
27
+ 4. The parties are jointly responsible for submitting a written report of this conference outlining the proposed discovery plan within 14 days after the conference.
28
+
29
+ 5. Counsel for the parties shall hold a scheduling conference either at the same time as the discovery conference described in Rule 26(1) or within fourteen (14) calendar days thereafter. See Local Rule 16.1(B).
30
+
31
+ 6. Within fourteen (14) days of the scheduling conference, counsel shall file a joint scheduling report pursuant to Local Rule 16.1(B)(2). This report shall indicate the proposed month and year for the trial plus the estimated number of trial days required, as well as an indication of whether the trial is to be a jury trial or bench trial.
32
+
33
+ 7. The parties may submit a single report combining the discovery plan report and the scheduling conference report.
34
+
35
+ 8. Failure of counsel or unrepresented parties to file a discovery plan report or joint scheduling report may result in dismissal, default, and the imposition of other sanctions including attorney's fees and costs.
36
+
37
+ DONE AND SIGNED in at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 11i° day of March, 2008.
38
+
39
+ > KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge
40
+
41
+ Copies furnished to:
42
+
43
+ All counsel
marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739234/EFTA02739234.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,120 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739234.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 2,
15
+ "chars": 2695,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 0.74,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 206.856,
27
+ 57.50999999999999
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 405.5581359863281,
31
+ 57.50999999999999
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 405.5581359863281,
35
+ 86.9830322265625
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 206.856,
39
+ 86.9830322265625
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ }
43
+ ],
44
+ "page_stats": [
45
+ {
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
48
+ "block_counts": [
49
+ [
50
+ "Span",
51
+ 51
52
+ ],
53
+ [
54
+ "Line",
55
+ 26
56
+ ],
57
+ [
58
+ "Text",
59
+ 11
60
+ ],
61
+ [
62
+ "PageHeader",
63
+ 1
64
+ ],
65
+ [
66
+ "SectionHeader",
67
+ 1
68
+ ],
69
+ [
70
+ "PageFooter",
71
+ 1
72
+ ]
73
+ ],
74
+ "block_metadata": {
75
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
76
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
77
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
78
+ "previous_text": "",
79
+ "previous_type": "",
80
+ "previous_order": 0
81
+ }
82
+ },
83
+ {
84
+ "page_id": 1,
85
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
86
+ "block_counts": [
87
+ [
88
+ "Span",
89
+ 51
90
+ ],
91
+ [
92
+ "Line",
93
+ 25
94
+ ],
95
+ [
96
+ "Text",
97
+ 10
98
+ ],
99
+ [
100
+ "PageFooter",
101
+ 2
102
+ ],
103
+ [
104
+ "PageHeader",
105
+ 1
106
+ ]
107
+ ],
108
+ "block_metadata": {
109
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
110
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
111
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
112
+ "previous_text": "",
113
+ "previous_type": "",
114
+ "previous_order": 0
115
+ }
116
+ }
117
+ ],
118
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739234"
119
+ }
120
+ }
marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739236/EFTA02739236.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ **ATTN:**
2
+
3
+ U.S. SOUTHERN DIST. COURT FLORIDA COUNTY
4
+
5
+ JANE DOE NO. 3
6
+
7
+ plaintiff
8
+
9
+ Index No. 08CV80232
10
+
11
+ - against -
12
+
13
+ Date Filed .....
14
+
15
+ JEFFREY EPSTEIN
16
+
17
+ defendant
18
+
19
+ Office No.
20
+
21
+ Court Date: / /
22
+
23
+ STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF NEW YORK :SS:
24
+ HARRY [REDACTED] being duly sworn, deposes and says; I am over 18 years
25
+ of age, not a party to this action, and reside in the State of New York. That on the
26
+ 7th day of May, 2008 07:45 AM at
27
+
28
+ 9 EAST 71ST ST
29
+ NEW YORK, NY 10021
30
+
31
+ I served the SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT
32
+
33
+ after prior attempts were made on: 04/23/2008 06:15 PM 04/24/2008 02:30 PM 05/01/2008 06:27PM
34
+ upon JEFFREY EPSTEIN \*\*
35
+
36
+ the DEFENDANT therein named by delivering and leaving a true copy or copies
37
+ of the aforementioned documents with
38
+
39
+ "JOHN [REDACTED]", ASSISTANT & HOUSE STAFF EMPLOYEE
40
+
41
+ WHO REFUSED TRUE NAME
42
+
43
+ a person of suitable age and discretion, who refused access to DEFENDANT's
44
+ actual apartment, and accepted in accordance with his/her everyday duties.
45
+
46
+ Deponent describes the person served as aforesaid to the best of deponent's ability
47
+ at the time and circumstances of the service as follows:
48
+
49
+ SEX: MALE COLOR: [REDACTED] HAIR: [REDACTED] AGE: 45 HEIGHT: 6:0 WEIGHT: 200
50
+
51
+ OTHER IDENTIFYING FEATURES: MUSTACHE/BEARD
52
+
53
+ On 05/12/2008 I deposited in the United States mail a true copy of the aforementioned
54
+ documents properly enclosed and sealed in a post paid wrapper addressed to the said -
55
+ DEFENDANT at the above address - That address being -
56
+
57
+ last known residence, usual place of abode of the DEFENDANT -
58
+
59
+ Copy mailed 1st class mail marked personal & confidential not indicating on the outside thereof
60
+ by return address or otherwise that said notice is from an attorney or conserns action against
61
+ the person to be served. \*\* & 5/5/08 9:20PM
62
+
63
+ That at the time of service as aforesaid, I asked person spoken to whether DEFENDANT
64
+ was in the military service of the State of New York or United States and received a negative
65
+ reply. Upon information and belief based upon the conversation and observation as aforesaid
66
+ I aver that the DEFENDANT is not in the military service of the State of New York or the
67
+ United States as that term is defined in the statutes of the State of New York or the Federal
68
+ Soldiers and Sailors Civil Relief Act.
69
+
70
+ DEPONENT STATED AT THE TIME OF SERVICE HE HAD LEGAL PAPERS IN A FLORIDA ACTION.
71
+
72
+ Sworn to before me this
73
+
74
+ 12th day of May 2008ni
75
+
76
+ SAMSON [REDACTED]
77
+
78
+ Notary Public, State of New York
79
+
80
+ No. 01NE-4783767
81
+
82
+ Qualified in NEW YORK COUNTY
83
+
84
+ Commission Expires 11/03/2009
85
+
86
+ HARRY TORRES 0915257
87
+ AETNA CENTRAL JUDICIAL SERVICES
88
+ 225 BROADWAY, SUITE 1802
89
+ NEW YORK, NY, 10007
90
+ Reference No: 3HM4124078
marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739236/EFTA02739236.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739236.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 1,
15
+ "chars": 2668,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 11.59,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [],
20
+ "page_stats": [
21
+ {
22
+ "page_id": 0,
23
+ "text_extraction_method": "surya",
24
+ "block_counts": [
25
+ [
26
+ "Text",
27
+ 80
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ "PageHeader",
31
+ 2
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ "PageFooter",
35
+ 2
36
+ ]
37
+ ],
38
+ "block_metadata": {
39
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
40
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
41
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
42
+ "previous_text": "",
43
+ "previous_type": "",
44
+ "previous_order": 0
45
+ }
46
+ }
47
+ ],
48
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739236"
49
+ }
50
+ }
marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739237/EFTA02739237.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,112 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ Form 42 - DOORMAN 144221 MILITARY
2
+
3
+ HERMAN & MERMELSTEIN PA
4
+
5
+ ATTN:
6
+
7
+ U.S.SOUTHERN DIST. COURT FLORIDA COUNTY
8
+
9
+ JANE DOE NO.3
10
+
11
+ - against -
12
+
13
+ 'plaintiff.
14
+
15
+ JEFFREY EPSTEIN defendant
16
+
17
+ Index No. 08CV80232
18
+
19
+ Date Filed
20
+
21
+ Office No.
22
+
23
+ Court Date: / /
24
+
25
+ STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF NEW YORK :SS:
26
+
27
+ HARRY being duly sworn, deposes and says; I am over 18 years
28
+
29
+ of age, not a party to this action, and reside in the State of New York. That on the 7th day of May, 2008 07:45 AM at
30
+
31
+ 9 EAST 71ST ST
32
+
33
+ NEW YORK, NY 10021
34
+
35
+ served the SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT
36
+
37
+ after prior attempts were made on: 04/23/2008 06:15 PM 04/24/2008 02:30 PM 05/01/2008 06:27PN \* \*
38
+
39
+ upon JEFFREY EPSTEIN
40
+
41
+ the DEFENDANT therein named by delivering and leaving a true copy or copies of the aforementioned documents with
42
+
43
+ "JOHN \*, ASSISTANT & HOUSE STAFF EMPLOYEE
44
+
45
+ WHO REFUSED TRUE NAME
46
+
47
+ a person of suitable age and discretion, who refused access to DEFENDANT' s actual apartment, and accepted in accordance with his/her everyday duties.
48
+
49
+ Deponent describes the person served as aforesaid to the beat of deponent's ability at the time and circumstances of the service as follows:
50
+
51
+ SEX: MALE COLOR: HAIR: AGE: 45 HEIGHT: 6:0 WEIGHT: 200
52
+
53
+ OTHER IDENTIFYING FEATURES: MUSTACHE/BEARD
54
+
55
+ On- 05,3.2712008-1--depefri-ted-in--the-UniteciStatee-Mia-a-trus-copy..af \_tJae\_afor-amentiontd. desume;its-pr,operair-encackried-and-seal.ed-in.a-post..- pal&napper-addr4temecl-4e-Gbe-sa441- IIREENDANT-at theLaboue-addzess ...That-address..being..
56
+
57
+ leas..t...kncasza. res 4 fience, aisuat-pla.clt-af—abode--of,--the--DEFENDANT-.
58
+
59
+ Comt\_mailethast-class-mail-marIcsacl-personal-&-conticlentiaL-not £ndioatSng-enfike-eutsida-therec! by-vetrunt-edePeeee-er ethe.. wise- \*herb- •ea -neei-ee- -is -from-an-ISeerneY-e-Oengerea6-aetaieD-aga4Bat the-pareew-tubemserved. \*\* & 5/5/08 9:20PM
60
+
61
+ That at the time of service as aforesaid, I asked person spoken to whether DEFENDANT was in the military service of the State of New York or United States and received a negative reply. Upon information and belief based upon the conversation and observation as aforesaid I aver that the DEFENDANT is not in the military service of the State of New York o₹ the United States as that term is defined in the statutes of the State of New York or the Federal Soldiers and Sailors Civil Relief Act.
62
+
63
+ DEPONENT STATED AT THE TIME OF SERVICE HE HAD LEG• P ERS IN A FLORIDA ACTION.
64
+
65
+ Sworn to before me this
66
+
67
+ 12th day of May/ 2008ni
68
+
69
+ SAMSON Notary Public, No.01NE-47 3767 York
70
+
71
+ Qualified in NEW YORK COUNTY Commission Expires 11/03/2009 ORRE 015257
72
+
73
+ AE A CENTRAL JUDICIAL SERVICES
74
+
75
+ 225 BROADWAY, SUITE 1802
76
+
77
+ NEW YORK, NY, 10007
78
+
79
+ Reference No: 3HM4124078
80
+
81
+ ![](_page_0_Picture_44.jpeg)
82
+
83
+ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
84
+ SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
85
+
86
+ CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA/ [REDACTED]
87
+
88
+ JANE DOE NO. 3,
89
+
90
+ Plaintiff,
91
+
92
+ vs.
93
+
94
+ JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
95
+
96
+ Defendant.
97
+
98
+ \_\_\_\_\_/
99
+
100
+ NON-MILITARY AFFIDAVIT
101
+
102
+ STATE OF FLORIDA )
103
+ ) SS:
104
+ COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE )
105
+
106
+ **BEFORE ME**, the undersigned authority, personally appeared ADAM D. HOROWITZ, ESQ., an attorney of record for the Plaintiff, who is personally known to me, and who after first being duly sworn, deposes and says on personal knowledge that Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, is not on active duty in the armed forces of the United States.
107
+
108
+ ![]()Sworn to and subscribed before me this 29 day of May, 2008.
109
+
110
+ ![]()My Commission expires:
111
+
112
+ ![]()![](_page_1_Picture_124.jpeg)
marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739237/EFTA02739237.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,154 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739237.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 2,
15
+ "chars": 3411,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 5.5,
17
+ "image_assets": [
18
+ "_page_0_Picture_44.jpeg",
19
+ "_page_1_Picture_124.jpeg"
20
+ ],
21
+ "marker_metadata": {
22
+ "table_of_contents": [
23
+ {
24
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
25
+ "heading_level": null,
26
+ "page_id": 1,
27
+ "polygon": [
28
+ [
29
+ 207.194,
30
+ 88.39899999999999
31
+ ],
32
+ [
33
+ 405.193,
34
+ 88.39899999999999
35
+ ],
36
+ [
37
+ 405.193,
38
+ 115.973
39
+ ],
40
+ [
41
+ 207.194,
42
+ 115.973
43
+ ]
44
+ ]
45
+ },
46
+ {
47
+ "title": "NON-MILITARY AFFIDAVIT",
48
+ "heading_level": null,
49
+ "page_id": 1,
50
+ "polygon": [
51
+ [
52
+ 221.90599999999995,
53
+ 300.881
54
+ ],
55
+ [
56
+ 389.25499999999994,
57
+ 300.881
58
+ ],
59
+ [
60
+ 389.25499999999994,
61
+ 314.668
62
+ ],
63
+ [
64
+ 221.90599999999995,
65
+ 314.668
66
+ ]
67
+ ]
68
+ }
69
+ ],
70
+ "page_stats": [
71
+ {
72
+ "page_id": 0,
73
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
74
+ "block_counts": [
75
+ [
76
+ "Span",
77
+ 164
78
+ ],
79
+ [
80
+ "Line",
81
+ 64
82
+ ],
83
+ [
84
+ "Text",
85
+ 43
86
+ ],
87
+ [
88
+ "PageHeader",
89
+ 1
90
+ ],
91
+ [
92
+ "Picture",
93
+ 1
94
+ ],
95
+ [
96
+ "PageFooter",
97
+ 1
98
+ ]
99
+ ],
100
+ "block_metadata": {
101
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
102
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
103
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
104
+ "previous_text": "",
105
+ "previous_type": "",
106
+ "previous_order": 0
107
+ }
108
+ },
109
+ {
110
+ "page_id": 1,
111
+ "text_extraction_method": "surya",
112
+ "block_counts": [
113
+ [
114
+ "Span",
115
+ 61
116
+ ],
117
+ [
118
+ "Text",
119
+ 29
120
+ ],
121
+ [
122
+ "Line",
123
+ 26
124
+ ],
125
+ [
126
+ "SectionHeader",
127
+ 4
128
+ ],
129
+ [
130
+ "Picture",
131
+ 3
132
+ ],
133
+ [
134
+ "PageHeader",
135
+ 2
136
+ ],
137
+ [
138
+ "PageFooter",
139
+ 2
140
+ ]
141
+ ],
142
+ "block_metadata": {
143
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
144
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
145
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
146
+ "previous_text": "",
147
+ "previous_type": "",
148
+ "previous_order": 0
149
+ }
150
+ }
151
+ ],
152
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739237"
153
+ }
154
+ }
marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739237/_page_0_Picture_44.jpeg ADDED

Git LFS Details

  • SHA256: 56a0412f49bc979a1e1076170f82564b7e1be4c059ab0c4a882524236a28c25f
  • Pointer size: 130 Bytes
  • Size of remote file: 13.6 kB
marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739237/_page_1_Picture_124.jpeg ADDED

Git LFS Details

  • SHA256: 59a5e7c941bce1452f74004f60eb5cb56bae296425f2a146f681095e6c46848a
  • Pointer size: 130 Bytes
  • Size of remote file: 13.3 kB
marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739239/EFTA02739239.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
2
+
3
+ CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA
4
+
5
+ JANE DOE NO. 3,
6
+
7
+ Plaintiff,
8
+
9
+ vs.
10
+
11
+ JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
12
+
13
+ Defendant.
14
+
15
+ /
16
+
17
+ ## DEFAULT
18
+
19
+ It appearing that the Defendant Jeffrey Epstein is in Default for failure to plead or otherwise defend as required by law. Default is hereby entered as against the said Defendant this day of May, 2008.
20
+
21
+ CLERK OF COURT
marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739239/EFTA02739239.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739239.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 1,
15
+ "chars": 387,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 0.87,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 205.02,
27
+ 86.67
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 405.95098876953125,
31
+ 86.67
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 405.95098876953125,
35
+ 115.4830322265625
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 205.02,
39
+ 115.4830322265625
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "DEFAULT",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 273.564,
50
+ 295.65
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 337.87054443359375,
54
+ 295.65
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 337.87054443359375,
58
+ 310.863037109375
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 273.564,
62
+ 310.863037109375
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ }
66
+ ],
67
+ "page_stats": [
68
+ {
69
+ "page_id": 0,
70
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
71
+ "block_counts": [
72
+ [
73
+ "Span",
74
+ 35
75
+ ],
76
+ [
77
+ "Line",
78
+ 18
79
+ ],
80
+ [
81
+ "Text",
82
+ 9
83
+ ],
84
+ [
85
+ "PageFooter",
86
+ 4
87
+ ],
88
+ [
89
+ "SectionHeader",
90
+ 2
91
+ ],
92
+ [
93
+ "PageHeader",
94
+ 1
95
+ ]
96
+ ],
97
+ "block_metadata": {
98
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
99
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
100
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
101
+ "previous_text": "",
102
+ "previous_type": "",
103
+ "previous_order": 0
104
+ }
105
+ }
106
+ ],
107
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739239"
108
+ }
109
+ }
marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739240/EFTA02739240.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
2
+
3
+ CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA/JOHNSON
4
+
5
+ JANE DOE NO. 3,
6
+
7
+ Plaintiff, vs.
8
+
9
+ JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
10
+
11
+ Defendant.
12
+
13
+ ## PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT AGAINST DEFENDANT
14
+
15
+ Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 3, by and through her undersigned counsel, and pursuant to the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a) and S.D. Ha. L.R. 7.1, hereby files this Motion for Entry of Default Against Defendant, and states as follows:
16
+
17
+ - 1. On May 7, 2008. Defendant Jeffrey Epstein was served with a Summons and Complaint in this case. A copy of the Affidavit of Service is attached hereto as Exhibit "A".
18
+ - 2. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a)(1), Defendant was required to answer or otherwise serve a response to the Complaint on or before May 27, 2008.
19
+ - 3. To date, Defendant has neither answered the Complaint, filed a response of any kind, nor requested an enlargement of time. Moreover, no attorney has entered an appearance on behalf of the Defendant.
20
+ - 4. The Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein is not on active duty in the armed forces of the United States. See Exhibit "B".
21
+ - 5. Accordingly, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a), Plaintiff applies to this Honorable Court for the entry of default judgment against the Defendant.
22
+
23
+ WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, JANE DOE NO. 3, respectfully requests this Court to grant this motion in favor of Plaintiff and enter a default against Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN.
24
+
25
+ Dated: May 29, 2008. Respectfully submitted,
26
+
27
+ By: s/ Adam D. Horowitz
28
+
29
+ Jeffrey M. Herman (FL Bar No.
30
+
31
+ Bar No.
32
+
33
+ Adam D. Horowitz (FL Bar No.
34
+
35
+ HERMAN & MERMELSTEIN, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiffs Jane Doe
36
+
37
+ ![](_page_1_Picture_9.jpeg)
38
+
39
+ ## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
40
+
41
+ I hereby certify that on May 29, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day to all parties on the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CWECF or in some other authorized manner for those parties who are not authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing.
42
+
43
+ /s/ Adam D. Horowitz
44
+
45
+ ## SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN CASE NO.: 013-CV-80232-MARRA/ United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
46
+
47
+ Jeffrey Epstein (Via Regular Mail) 9 East 71st Street New York, NY 10021
48
+
49
+ /s/ Adam D. Horowitz
marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739240/EFTA02739240.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,245 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739240.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 3,
15
+ "chars": 2436,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 0.92,
17
+ "image_assets": [
18
+ "_page_1_Picture_9.jpeg"
19
+ ],
20
+ "marker_metadata": {
21
+ "table_of_contents": [
22
+ {
23
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
24
+ "heading_level": null,
25
+ "page_id": 0,
26
+ "polygon": [
27
+ [
28
+ 206.24400000000003,
29
+ 85.85999999999999
30
+ ],
31
+ [
32
+ 405.95098876953125,
33
+ 85.85999999999999
34
+ ],
35
+ [
36
+ 405.95098876953125,
37
+ 115.4830322265625
38
+ ],
39
+ [
40
+ 206.24400000000003,
41
+ 115.4830322265625
42
+ ]
43
+ ]
44
+ },
45
+ {
46
+ "title": "PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ENTRY \nOF DEFAULT AGAINST DEFENDANT",
47
+ "heading_level": null,
48
+ "page_id": 0,
49
+ "polygon": [
50
+ [
51
+ 197.06400000000002,
52
+ 295.65
53
+ ],
54
+ [
55
+ 415.0776062011719,
56
+ 295.65
57
+ ],
58
+ [
59
+ 415.0776062011719,
60
+ 325.10302734375
61
+ ],
62
+ [
63
+ 197.06400000000002,
64
+ 325.10302734375
65
+ ]
66
+ ]
67
+ },
68
+ {
69
+ "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
70
+ "heading_level": null,
71
+ "page_id": 1,
72
+ "polygon": [
73
+ [
74
+ 227.052,
75
+ 447.93
76
+ ],
77
+ [
78
+ 385.0019836425781,
79
+ 447.93
80
+ ],
81
+ [
82
+ 385.0019836425781,
83
+ 462.363037109375
84
+ ],
85
+ [
86
+ 227.052,
87
+ 462.363037109375
88
+ ]
89
+ ]
90
+ },
91
+ {
92
+ "title": "SERVICE LIST \nDOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN \nCASE NO.: 013-CV-80232-MARRA/ \nUnited States District Court, Southern District of Florida",
93
+ "heading_level": null,
94
+ "page_id": 2,
95
+ "polygon": [
96
+ [
97
+ 157.28400000000002,
98
+ 85.05
99
+ ],
100
+ [
101
+ 455.6502685546875,
102
+ 85.05
103
+ ],
104
+ [
105
+ 455.6502685546875,
106
+ 143.30352783203125
107
+ ],
108
+ [
109
+ 157.28400000000002,
110
+ 143.30352783203125
111
+ ]
112
+ ]
113
+ }
114
+ ],
115
+ "page_stats": [
116
+ {
117
+ "page_id": 0,
118
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
119
+ "block_counts": [
120
+ [
121
+ "Span",
122
+ 56
123
+ ],
124
+ [
125
+ "Line",
126
+ 28
127
+ ],
128
+ [
129
+ "Text",
130
+ 8
131
+ ],
132
+ [
133
+ "ListItem",
134
+ 5
135
+ ],
136
+ [
137
+ "SectionHeader",
138
+ 2
139
+ ],
140
+ [
141
+ "PageFooter",
142
+ 2
143
+ ],
144
+ [
145
+ "PageHeader",
146
+ 1
147
+ ],
148
+ [
149
+ "ListGroup",
150
+ 1
151
+ ]
152
+ ],
153
+ "block_metadata": {
154
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
155
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
156
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
157
+ "previous_text": "",
158
+ "previous_type": "",
159
+ "previous_order": 0
160
+ }
161
+ },
162
+ {
163
+ "page_id": 1,
164
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
165
+ "block_counts": [
166
+ [
167
+ "Span",
168
+ 41
169
+ ],
170
+ [
171
+ "Line",
172
+ 20
173
+ ],
174
+ [
175
+ "Text",
176
+ 10
177
+ ],
178
+ [
179
+ "PageFooter",
180
+ 4
181
+ ],
182
+ [
183
+ "PageHeader",
184
+ 1
185
+ ],
186
+ [
187
+ "Picture",
188
+ 1
189
+ ],
190
+ [
191
+ "SectionHeader",
192
+ 1
193
+ ]
194
+ ],
195
+ "block_metadata": {
196
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
197
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
198
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
199
+ "previous_text": "",
200
+ "previous_type": "",
201
+ "previous_order": 0
202
+ }
203
+ },
204
+ {
205
+ "page_id": 2,
206
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
207
+ "block_counts": [
208
+ [
209
+ "Span",
210
+ 23
211
+ ],
212
+ [
213
+ "Line",
214
+ 12
215
+ ],
216
+ [
217
+ "PageFooter",
218
+ 4
219
+ ],
220
+ [
221
+ "Text",
222
+ 2
223
+ ],
224
+ [
225
+ "PageHeader",
226
+ 1
227
+ ],
228
+ [
229
+ "SectionHeader",
230
+ 1
231
+ ]
232
+ ],
233
+ "block_metadata": {
234
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
235
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
236
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
237
+ "previous_text": "",
238
+ "previous_type": "",
239
+ "previous_order": 0
240
+ }
241
+ }
242
+ ],
243
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739240"
244
+ }
245
+ }
marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739240/_page_1_Picture_9.jpeg ADDED

Git LFS Details

  • SHA256: 1a9d522c436152077f750ef54af6a0ae0937447e4375055dd7505465b3cd4d48
  • Pointer size: 129 Bytes
  • Size of remote file: 3.83 kB
marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739243/EFTA02739243.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ## IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
2
+
3
+ CASE NO.:08-CV-80119-MARRA-MMI
4
+
5
+ JANE DOE NO. 2,
6
+
7
+ Plaintiff, vs.
8
+
9
+ JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
10
+
11
+ Defendant.
12
+
13
+ ## NOTICE OF FILING PERMANENT APPEARANCE
14
+
15
+ The Clerk of Court shall enter the appearance of the undersigned counsel for JEFFREY EPSTEIN, in the above-entitled cause.
16
+
17
+ DATED: June 13, 2008
18
+
19
+ I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy hereof has been furnished to Jeffrey M. Herman, Esquire, Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esquire and Adam D. Horowitz, Esq., Herman & Mermelstein, P.A., 18205 Biscayne Blvd, Suite 2218, Miami, Florida, 33160 this 13'h day of June, 2008.
20
+
21
+ > ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER & WEISS, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 659-8300 Fax: (561)835-8691
22
+
23
+ /s/Jack A. Goldberger. Esq. JACK A. GOLDBERGER, ESQUIRE Florida Bar No. 262013
marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739243/EFTA02739243.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739243.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 1,
15
+ "chars": 849,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 0.88,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 176.42001342773438,
27
+ 72.9
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 413.898,
31
+ 72.9
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 413.898,
35
+ 101.968017578125
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 176.42001342773438,
39
+ 101.968017578125
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "NOTICE OF FILING PERMANENT APPEARANCE",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 153.924,
50
+ 301.32
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 434.502,
54
+ 301.32
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 434.502,
58
+ 316.468017578125
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 153.924,
62
+ 316.468017578125
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ }
66
+ ],
67
+ "page_stats": [
68
+ {
69
+ "page_id": 0,
70
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
71
+ "block_counts": [
72
+ [
73
+ "Span",
74
+ 53
75
+ ],
76
+ [
77
+ "Line",
78
+ 26
79
+ ],
80
+ [
81
+ "Text",
82
+ 10
83
+ ],
84
+ [
85
+ "SectionHeader",
86
+ 2
87
+ ],
88
+ [
89
+ "PageHeader",
90
+ 1
91
+ ],
92
+ [
93
+ "PageFooter",
94
+ 1
95
+ ]
96
+ ],
97
+ "block_metadata": {
98
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
99
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
100
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
101
+ "previous_text": "",
102
+ "previous_type": "",
103
+ "previous_order": 0
104
+ }
105
+ }
106
+ ],
107
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739243"
108
+ }
109
+ }
marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739244/EFTA02739244.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ## EXHIBIT A
2
+
3
+ **AFFIDAVIT OF RICHARD BARNETT**
4
+
5
+ I, Richard Barnett, being duly sworn, do depose and state as follows:
6
+
7
+ 1. 1. I am over the age of 18, am otherwise competent to testify and base the following on my personal knowledge.
8
+ 2. 2. On May 7, 2008, I received copies of the summons and complaint in four lawsuits:
9
+ 1. a. Jane Doe #2 v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 08-CV-80119,
10
+ 2. b. Jane Doe #3 v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 08-CV-80232,
11
+ 3. c. Jane Doe #4 v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 08-CV-80380, and
12
+ 4. d. Jane Doe #5 v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 08-CV-80381.
13
+ 3. 3. I do not now, nor have I ever resided at 9 East 71st Street, New York, New York.
14
+
15
+ FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NAUGHT.
16
+
17
+ ![]()Sworn and subscribed before me
18
+ this 12<sup>th</sup> day of June 2008 by
19
+ Richard Barnett, who
20
+ is personally known to me. I or did provide
21
+ as identification.
22
+
23
+ ![]()MY COMMISSION EXPIRES:
24
+
25
+ LAUREN J. KWINTNER
26
+ Notary Public, State of New York
27
+ No. 02KW6016686
28
+ Qualified in New York County
29
+ Commission Expires November 30, 20 10
marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739244/EFTA02739244.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,147 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739244.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 2,
15
+ "chars": 1037,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 4.44,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "EXHIBIT A",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 204.18,
27
+ 318.6531066894531
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 404.5699768066406,
31
+ 318.6531066894531
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 404.5699768066406,
35
+ 360.05908203125
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 204.18,
39
+ 360.05908203125
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "AFFIDAVIT OF RICHARD BARNETT",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 1,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 178.12,
50
+ 85.85999999999999
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 419.07000000000005,
54
+ 85.85999999999999
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 419.07000000000005,
58
+ 101.25
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 178.12,
62
+ 101.25
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ }
66
+ ],
67
+ "page_stats": [
68
+ {
69
+ "page_id": 0,
70
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
71
+ "block_counts": [
72
+ [
73
+ "Span",
74
+ 5
75
+ ],
76
+ [
77
+ "Line",
78
+ 3
79
+ ],
80
+ [
81
+ "PageHeader",
82
+ 1
83
+ ],
84
+ [
85
+ "SectionHeader",
86
+ 1
87
+ ],
88
+ [
89
+ "PageFooter",
90
+ 1
91
+ ]
92
+ ],
93
+ "block_metadata": {
94
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
95
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
96
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
97
+ "previous_text": "",
98
+ "previous_type": "",
99
+ "previous_order": 0
100
+ }
101
+ },
102
+ {
103
+ "page_id": 1,
104
+ "text_extraction_method": "surya",
105
+ "block_counts": [
106
+ [
107
+ "Span",
108
+ 56
109
+ ],
110
+ [
111
+ "Line",
112
+ 27
113
+ ],
114
+ [
115
+ "Text",
116
+ 14
117
+ ],
118
+ [
119
+ "PageHeader",
120
+ 2
121
+ ],
122
+ [
123
+ "SectionHeader",
124
+ 2
125
+ ],
126
+ [
127
+ "ListGroup",
128
+ 2
129
+ ],
130
+ [
131
+ "PageFooter",
132
+ 2
133
+ ]
134
+ ],
135
+ "block_metadata": {
136
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
137
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
138
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
139
+ "previous_text": "",
140
+ "previous_type": "",
141
+ "previous_order": 0
142
+ }
143
+ }
144
+ ],
145
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739244"
146
+ }
147
+ }
marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739246/EFTA02739246.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,135 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
2
+
3
+ CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA-]
4
+
5
+ JANE DOE NO. 3,
6
+
7
+ Plaintiff,
8
+
9
+ vs.
10
+
11
+ JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
12
+
13
+ Defendant.
14
+
15
+ /
16
+
17
+ ## RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR ENTRY OF CLERK'S DEFAULT
18
+
19
+ Defendant Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(c), hereby opposes plaintiff Jane Doe No. 3's motion for a clerk's default upon the following showing of "good cause."
20
+
21
+ ## Introduction
22
+
23
+ The clerk's default should not be entered. Service was effected as of June 2. Accordingly the response is due 20 days later, on or before June 23. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1)(A)(i).
24
+
25
+ The plaintiff, in moving for a clerk's default, implied that service was made in accordance with either federal or Florida procedure. As discussed below, however, service was clearly ineffective under the federal and Florida rules of procedure. Accordingly, the only possibility for valid service was service under New York rules of procedure. Cf. RCP's Lear, LLC v. Taughannock Aviation Corp., No. 5:07-CV-96, 2008 WL 305103, at \*4 (N.D.N.Y. Jan. 31, 2008) (observing that "[a]s a threshold matter, the court must [first] address the rules pursuant to which process was served").
26
+
27
+ Service of process was valid under New York's rule for so-called "substitute-service" (i.e., service in a manner other than delivery in-hand to the defendant herself or himself), but that statute gives the defendant more time to respond than do the federal or Florida rules. See id. (acknowledging that Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(e)(2) has a "'resided therein' requirement," unlike "New York's substituted service statute," NY CPLR 308); NY CPLR 308 (providing that service is not deemed effected until /0 days after the process-server's affidavit is filed with the Court).
28
+
29
+ This is not a motion to quash, or a motion arguing that service was completely ineffective. To the contrary, we acknowledge that service was effective under New York procedure, but point out that it was ineffective under Florida and federal procedure. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(e)(1) permits service to be made according to "state law for serving a summons in . . . the state . . . where service is made" as an alternative to following the federal service method (i.e., Rule 4(e)(2)).
30
+
31
+ As shown below, under New York's so-called "substituted-service" rule, service was effected on June 2, not May 7 (as the plaintiff and the deputy clerk of court evidently believed). Accordingly, the defendant's response to the complaint is not due until June 23. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1)(A)(i) (allowing 20 days from the date of service of process to serve answer),I
32
+
33
+ ## Facts and Procedural History
34
+
35
+ 1. On May 7, 2008, service was delivered at defendant Epstein's house located at 9 East 71st Street, New York, New York, to Richard Barnett, an employee.
36
+
37
+ 2. Mr. Barnett does not reside at that address. See Affidavit of Richard Barnett (attached as Ex. A).
38
+
39
+ 3. On May 29, 2008, the plaintiff moved for an entry of default against Mr. Epstein. [D.E. 5].2 The Clerk of Court has not yet acted on the plaintiff's motion.3
40
+
41
+ In this case, the 20th day falls on a Saturday (June 21). The answer is therefore due on Monday, June 23. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a)(3) (establishing that when a deadline falls on Saturday, the "period runs until the end of the next day that is not a Saturday").
42
+
43
+ <sup>2</sup>Notably, the plaintiffs attorney never mailed Mr. Epstein a copy of his motion for a Clerk's entry of default.
44
+
45
+ <sup>3</sup>The plaintiffs attorney here previously filed an identical action, captioned Jane Doe No. 1 v. Epstein, Case No. 08-80069-KAM, on behalf of a different plaintiff. That action was voluntarily dismissed by the plaintiffs attorney after a motion to intervene was filed by Jane Doe No. 1 (through her mother) indicating that neither Jane Doe No. 1 nor her mother had consented to the attorney's filing the lawsuit on her behalf. See Case No. 08-80069-KAM [D.E. 9].
46
+
47
+ ## Overview of Rules for Service of Process
48
+
49
+ The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure authorize three distinct methods of service in a diversity action. First, service can be effected in accordance with the procedures "in the state where the district court is located" (here, Florida). See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(e)(1). Second, service can be effected in accordance with the procedures "in the state . .. where service is made" (here, New York). See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(e)(1). Third, service can be effected in accordance with federal procedure. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (e)(2). Cf. David D. Siegel, Practice Commentary on Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Commentary C4-22 (observing that "there is no priority between the [authorized methods of service]") (emphasis added).
50
+
51
+ Thus, when a diversity action is brought in the Southern District of Florida,
52
+
53
+ In addition to that action, the same plaintiff's attorney here has filed four other, identical lawsuits against Jeffrey Epstein on behalf of four plaintiffs that are still pending before this Court: Jane Doe No. 2 v. Epstein, Case No. 9:08-cv-80119-KAM; Jane Doe No. 3 v. Epstein, Case No. 9:08-cv-80232-KAM; Jane Doe No. 4 v. Epstein, Case No. 9:08-cv-80380-KAM; and Jane Doe No. 5 v. Epstein, Case No. 9:08-cv-80381-ICAM. Plaintiffs counsel has sought an entry of default in each case. In the Jane Doe No. 2 litigation, the deputy clerk, identified on the docket as "tp," declined to enter a default on the grounds that there had been "Improper Service." See 9:08-cv-80119-KAM [D.E. 7, 8]. In the Jane Doe No. 3 litigation, the deputy clerk has not yet ruled upon the plaintiff's motion. See Case No. 9:08-cv-80232-KAM [D.E. 5]. In the Jane Doe No. 4 and Jane Doe No. 5 litigation, the deputy clerk, identified on both docket sheets as "ail," entered the default. See Case No. 9:08-cv-80380-KAM [D.E. 7, 8] and Case No. 9:08-cv-80381-ICAM [D.E. 5, 6]. Since then, the plaintiff's attorney has moved for a judgment of default in those two cases (Jane Doe Nos. 4 and 5). See Case No. 9:08-cv-80380-ICAM [D.E. 9] and Case No. 9:08-cv-80381-KAM [D.E. 7].
54
+
55
+ and service is made in New York, service is effective when it complies with either Florida law or New York law, or alternatively, with federal procedure.
56
+
57
+ As discussed below, because New York does not have a residency requirement for the person to whom substitute-service is delivered (and Florida and the federal rules do), service was effective only in accordance with New York procedure. Cf. RCP's Lear, LLC, 2008 WL 305103, at \*4 (resolving parties' dispute concerning the intended method of service, and applicable procedure). Stated differently, service did not comply with either federal procedure or Florida procedure.
58
+
59
+ # New York Procedure—CPLR 308 (no residency requirement)
60
+
61
+ Under New York law, service of process can be effected by delivering the summons "to a person of suitable age and discretion at the . . . dwelling place or usual place of abode of the [defendant]," and when the summons is "mailed to the [defendant] at his or her last known residence or . . . mail[ed] . . . by first class mail to the [defendant] at his or her actual place of business" in accordance with specific technical instructions. N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 308(2) (McKinney 2008). As an additional requirement, "proof of such service shall be filed with the clerk of the court designated in the summons within twenty days of either such delivery or mailing, whichever is effected later." Id.
62
+
63
+ In accordance with New York procedure, such substituted service "shall be complete ten days after such filing." Id. (emphasis added). Accordingly, New York does not use the date of delivery to the person at the defendant's "abode" as the date service is effected. This was the point of error for the deputy clerk and the plaintiff's attorney.
64
+
65
+ ## Florida Procedure—Fla.,Stat.\* 48.031 (residency requirement)
66
+
67
+ Under Florida law, service of process can be effected "by leaving the copies [of the summons and complaint] at [the defendant's] usual place of abode with any person residing therein who is 15 years of age or older and informing the person of their contents." Fla. Stat. § 48.031(1)(a) (2007) (emphasis added). Service is deemed effected as of the date of delivery.
68
+
69
+ # Federal Procedure—Fed. R. Ch. P. 4 (e)(2)(B) (residency requirement)
70
+
71
+ Service is effective, under federally authorized procedures, when copies of both the summons and the complaint are "le[ft] . . . at the individual's dwelling or usual place of abode with someone of suitable age and discretion who resides there." Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (e)(2)(B). Again, service is deemed effected as of the date of delivery.
72
+
73
+ #### Discussion
74
+
75
+ Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's response to the complaint is not due until June 23. Accordingly, the clerk's entry of default was premature. For the following "good cause," it should be set aside. Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(c) ("The court may set aside an entry of default for good cause.").
76
+
77
+ # A. Service was not made on someone who "resided" at the subject address.
78
+
79
+ Substituted service was attempted on Richard Barnett at a house owned by Mr. Epstein located at 9 East 71st Street, New York, New York. See Affidavit of Service [D.E. 4]. Mr. Barnett has never lived there.4 (Barnett Aff.1 3.)
80
+
81
+ ### B. Because service was not made on someone who "resided" at the subject address, service was effective only in accordance with New York procedure.
82
+
83
+ Of the three possible methods of service in this case—New York service, Florida service, and federal-rules service—only New York rules allow substituted service on someone who does not "reside" at the service address. Compare Fla. Stat. § 48.031(1)(a) (authorizing substituted service of process only on a person meeting certain criteria who "reside[s]" at the service address), and Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (e)(2)(B) (same), with NY CPLR 308(2) (authorizing so-called "leave-and-mail"
84
+
85
+ <sup>4</sup> Indeed, in a motion for an order compelling the Clerk to enter default against Mr. Epstein, filed in connection with the Jane Doe No. 2 litigation, the plaintiff's attorney characterized Mr. Barnett simply as an "Assistant and House Staff Employee," not a resident of the property. Case No. 9:08-cv-80119-KAM [D.E. 9 at 2].
86
+
87
+ substituted service, which does not require delivery to a person who actually resides the service address).
88
+
89
+ Because Mr. Barnett was not a resident of 9 East 71st Street, logically, service could have been effected only in accordance with New York procedure.
90
+
91
+ # C. Service was effective as of June 2, not earlier.
92
+
93
+ As noted above, Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 permits service according to the law "in the state . . . where service is made," here, New York. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(e)(1). While New York permits substitute service on a non-resident at the defendant's "abode," such substituted service is not complete until 10 days after the affidavit reciting the method of service is actually filed with the Court. See NY CPLR 308(2).
94
+
95
+ Although the summons was left with Mr. Barnett at Epstein's New York home on May 7, the affidavit of service was not filed with the Court until May 22. Accordingly, under NY CPLR 308(2), service is not deemed complete until 10 days later, which was June 2. Counting 20 days more according to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1)(A)(i) and 5, Mr. Epstein's response is still not due until June 23. Accordingly, the plaintiffs motion for default was almost three weeks early and the default was entered improperly.
96
+
97
+ ## D. "Actual" notice is irrelevant.
98
+
99
+ In the related Jane Doe No. 2 case, the plaintiff advances the untenable position that the service rules are trumped simply because Epstein had "actual notice" of the complaints. See D.E. 9 at 4,1 9 (Jane Doe No. 2 v. Epstein, Case No. 9:08-cv-80119-ICAM) ("Defendant Epstein had actual notice of the filing of the Complaint, and the Plaintiff has exercised diligence and good faith in attempting to serve Defendant Epstein with process. Accordingly, entry of default is appropriate."). The Eleventh Circuit is clear, however, that "actual notice of a suit does not dispose of the requirements of service of process." v. Warden, FCC Coleman-USP, 259 Fed. Appx. 181, 182 n.2 (11th Cir. 2007) (citing Mfrs. Hanover Trust Co. v. Ponsoldt, 51 F.3d 938, 940 (11th Cir.1995)).
100
+
101
+ ## Conclusion
102
+
103
+ We do not dispute that service was effective. We only dispute the date that it became effective. Since service was ineffective under both Florida law and the federal-rules alternative (because the recipient of the service did not "reside" at the address), the only service law that could apply is New York's. New York's rule for substituted-service does not start the 20-day clock for responding to the complaint until 10 days after the process-server's affidavit is filed with the Court.
104
+
105
+ Accordingly, the 20-day clock did not start to tick (Le., service was not deemed to have been effected) until June 2. Counting time as provided by Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a)(3), Epstein has until June 23 to serve a response to the complaint.
106
+
107
+ WHEREFORE, "good cause" having been showing under Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(c), the clerk's default should not be entered.
108
+
109
+ Respectfully submitted,
110
+
111
+ ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER & WEISS, P.A.
112
+
113
+ 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Tel: 561 659 8300 Fax: 561 835 8691
114
+
115
+ By: /s/ Jack A. Goldberger Jack A. Goldberger Ha. Bar No. 262013 jgoldberger@ agwpa.com
116
+
117
+ Attorneys for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
118
+
119
+ ### CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL RULE 7
120
+
121
+ Counsel for defendant has conferred in good faith with counsel for the plaintiff, who opposes the relief requested in this motion.
122
+
123
+ /s/ Jack A. Goldberger
124
+
125
+ Jack A. Goldberger
126
+
127
+ ## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
128
+
129
+ I HEREBY CERTIFY that on June 13, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on counsel of record identified below by facsimile and U.S. Mail.
130
+
131
+ Jeffrey M. Herman, Esq. Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Herman & Mermelstein, P.A. 18205 Biscayne Blvd, Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160 Fax: 305 931 0877
132
+
133
+ /s/ Jack A. Goldberger
134
+
135
+ Jack A. Goldberger
marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739246/EFTA02739246.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,811 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739246.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 11,
15
+ "chars": 14092,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 1.43,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 183.6,
27
+ 88.28999999999999
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 417.3464050292969,
31
+ 88.28999999999999
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 417.3464050292969,
35
+ 120.88092041015625
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 183.6,
39
+ 120.88092041015625
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR ENTRY OF CLERK'S DEFAULT",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 100.36800000000001,
50
+ 353.15999999999997
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 512.4267578125,
54
+ 353.15999999999997
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 512.4267578125,
58
+ 370.2509460449219
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 100.36800000000001,
62
+ 370.2509460449219
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ },
66
+ {
67
+ "title": "Introduction",
68
+ "heading_level": null,
69
+ "page_id": 0,
70
+ "polygon": [
71
+ [
72
+ 264.384,
73
+ 481.95000000000005
74
+ ],
75
+ [
76
+ 347.4720764160156,
77
+ 481.95000000000005
78
+ ],
79
+ [
80
+ 347.4720764160156,
81
+ 498.8809509277344
82
+ ],
83
+ [
84
+ 264.384,
85
+ 498.8809509277344
86
+ ]
87
+ ]
88
+ },
89
+ {
90
+ "title": "Facts and Procedural History",
91
+ "heading_level": null,
92
+ "page_id": 2,
93
+ "polygon": [
94
+ [
95
+ 214.812,
96
+ 232.46999999999997
97
+ ],
98
+ [
99
+ 398.17950439453125,
100
+ 232.46999999999997
101
+ ],
102
+ [
103
+ 398.17950439453125,
104
+ 249.3714599609375
105
+ ],
106
+ [
107
+ 214.812,
108
+ 249.3714599609375
109
+ ]
110
+ ]
111
+ },
112
+ {
113
+ "title": "Overview of Rules for Service of Process",
114
+ "heading_level": null,
115
+ "page_id": 3,
116
+ "polygon": [
117
+ [
118
+ 182.988,
119
+ 72.08999999999999
120
+ ],
121
+ [
122
+ 431.10662841796875,
123
+ 72.08999999999999
124
+ ],
125
+ [
126
+ 431.10662841796875,
127
+ 89.00091552734375
128
+ ],
129
+ [
130
+ 182.988,
131
+ 89.00091552734375
132
+ ]
133
+ ]
134
+ },
135
+ {
136
+ "title": "New York Procedure\u2014CPLR 308 (no residency requirement)",
137
+ "heading_level": null,
138
+ "page_id": 4,
139
+ "polygon": [
140
+ [
141
+ 118.116,
142
+ 361.26
143
+ ],
144
+ [
145
+ 494.6922607421875,
146
+ 361.26
147
+ ],
148
+ [
149
+ 494.6922607421875,
150
+ 378.5009460449219
151
+ ],
152
+ [
153
+ 118.116,
154
+ 378.5009460449219
155
+ ]
156
+ ]
157
+ },
158
+ {
159
+ "title": "Florida Procedure\u2014Fla.,Stat.* 48.031 (residency requirement)",
160
+ "heading_level": null,
161
+ "page_id": 5,
162
+ "polygon": [
163
+ [
164
+ 114.44400000000002,
165
+ 232.46999999999997
166
+ ],
167
+ [
168
+ 498.79638671875,
169
+ 232.46999999999997
170
+ ],
171
+ [
172
+ 498.79638671875,
173
+ 249.50091552734375
174
+ ],
175
+ [
176
+ 114.44400000000002,
177
+ 249.50091552734375
178
+ ]
179
+ ]
180
+ },
181
+ {
182
+ "title": "Federal Procedure\u2014Fed. R. Ch. P. 4 (e)(2)(B) (residency requirement)",
183
+ "heading_level": null,
184
+ "page_id": 5,
185
+ "polygon": [
186
+ [
187
+ 91.18799999999999,
188
+ 425.25
189
+ ],
190
+ [
191
+ 521.616943359375,
192
+ 425.25
193
+ ],
194
+ [
195
+ 521.616943359375,
196
+ 442.6209411621094
197
+ ],
198
+ [
199
+ 91.18799999999999,
200
+ 442.6209411621094
201
+ ]
202
+ ]
203
+ },
204
+ {
205
+ "title": "Discussion",
206
+ "heading_level": null,
207
+ "page_id": 6,
208
+ "polygon": [
209
+ [
210
+ 271.728,
211
+ 72.9
212
+ ],
213
+ [
214
+ 340.8253173828125,
215
+ 72.9
216
+ ],
217
+ [
218
+ 340.8253173828125,
219
+ 88.491455078125
220
+ ],
221
+ [
222
+ 271.728,
223
+ 88.491455078125
224
+ ]
225
+ ]
226
+ },
227
+ {
228
+ "title": "A. Service was not made on someone who \"resided\" at the subject address.",
229
+ "heading_level": null,
230
+ "page_id": 6,
231
+ "polygon": [
232
+ [
233
+ 68.544,
234
+ 232.46999999999997
235
+ ],
236
+ [
237
+ 540.0640258789062,
238
+ 232.46999999999997
239
+ ],
240
+ [
241
+ 540.0640258789062,
242
+ 250.1214599609375
243
+ ],
244
+ [
245
+ 68.544,
246
+ 250.1214599609375
247
+ ]
248
+ ]
249
+ },
250
+ {
251
+ "title": "B. Because service was not made on someone who \"resided\" at the subject \naddress, service was effective only in accordance with New York \nprocedure.",
252
+ "heading_level": null,
253
+ "page_id": 6,
254
+ "polygon": [
255
+ [
256
+ 68.544,
257
+ 361.26
258
+ ],
259
+ [
260
+ 543.847412109375,
261
+ 361.26
262
+ ],
263
+ [
264
+ 543.847412109375,
265
+ 410.6214599609375
266
+ ],
267
+ [
268
+ 68.544,
269
+ 410.6214599609375
270
+ ]
271
+ ]
272
+ },
273
+ {
274
+ "title": "C. Service was effective as of June 2, not earlier.",
275
+ "heading_level": null,
276
+ "page_id": 7,
277
+ "polygon": [
278
+ [
279
+ 68.544,
280
+ 200.07
281
+ ],
282
+ [
283
+ 382.2289733886719,
284
+ 200.07
285
+ ],
286
+ [
287
+ 382.2289733886719,
288
+ 217.491455078125
289
+ ],
290
+ [
291
+ 68.544,
292
+ 217.491455078125
293
+ ]
294
+ ]
295
+ },
296
+ {
297
+ "title": "D. \"Actual\" notice is irrelevant.",
298
+ "heading_level": null,
299
+ "page_id": 8,
300
+ "polygon": [
301
+ [
302
+ 69.156,
303
+ 72.08999999999999
304
+ ],
305
+ [
306
+ 283.8944396972656,
307
+ 72.08999999999999
308
+ ],
309
+ [
310
+ 283.8944396972656,
311
+ 89.00091552734375
312
+ ],
313
+ [
314
+ 69.156,
315
+ 89.00091552734375
316
+ ]
317
+ ]
318
+ },
319
+ {
320
+ "title": "Conclusion",
321
+ "heading_level": null,
322
+ "page_id": 8,
323
+ "polygon": [
324
+ [
325
+ 269.892,
326
+ 426.06000000000006
327
+ ],
328
+ [
329
+ 342.80718994140625,
330
+ 426.06000000000006
331
+ ],
332
+ [
333
+ 342.80718994140625,
334
+ 443.0009460449219
335
+ ],
336
+ [
337
+ 269.892,
338
+ 443.0009460449219
339
+ ]
340
+ ]
341
+ },
342
+ {
343
+ "title": "CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL RULE 7",
344
+ "heading_level": null,
345
+ "page_id": 10,
346
+ "polygon": [
347
+ [
348
+ 118.116,
349
+ 104.49
350
+ ],
351
+ [
352
+ 495.2377624511719,
353
+ 104.49
354
+ ],
355
+ [
356
+ 495.2377624511719,
357
+ 120.88092041015625
358
+ ],
359
+ [
360
+ 118.116,
361
+ 120.88092041015625
362
+ ]
363
+ ]
364
+ },
365
+ {
366
+ "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
367
+ "heading_level": null,
368
+ "page_id": 10,
369
+ "polygon": [
370
+ [
371
+ 209.91600000000003,
372
+ 281.07
373
+ ],
374
+ [
375
+ 402.6063232421875,
376
+ 281.07
377
+ ],
378
+ [
379
+ 402.6063232421875,
380
+ 297.8809509277344
381
+ ],
382
+ [
383
+ 209.91600000000003,
384
+ 297.8809509277344
385
+ ]
386
+ ]
387
+ }
388
+ ],
389
+ "page_stats": [
390
+ {
391
+ "page_id": 0,
392
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
393
+ "block_counts": [
394
+ [
395
+ "Span",
396
+ 43
397
+ ],
398
+ [
399
+ "Line",
400
+ 22
401
+ ],
402
+ [
403
+ "Text",
404
+ 10
405
+ ],
406
+ [
407
+ "SectionHeader",
408
+ 3
409
+ ],
410
+ [
411
+ "PageHeader",
412
+ 1
413
+ ],
414
+ [
415
+ "PageFooter",
416
+ 1
417
+ ]
418
+ ],
419
+ "block_metadata": {
420
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
421
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
422
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
423
+ "previous_text": "",
424
+ "previous_type": "",
425
+ "previous_order": 0
426
+ }
427
+ },
428
+ {
429
+ "page_id": 1,
430
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
431
+ "block_counts": [
432
+ [
433
+ "Span",
434
+ 45
435
+ ],
436
+ [
437
+ "Line",
438
+ 23
439
+ ],
440
+ [
441
+ "Text",
442
+ 3
443
+ ],
444
+ [
445
+ "PageFooter",
446
+ 2
447
+ ],
448
+ [
449
+ "PageHeader",
450
+ 1
451
+ ]
452
+ ],
453
+ "block_metadata": {
454
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
455
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
456
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
457
+ "previous_text": "",
458
+ "previous_type": "",
459
+ "previous_order": 0
460
+ }
461
+ },
462
+ {
463
+ "page_id": 2,
464
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
465
+ "block_counts": [
466
+ [
467
+ "Span",
468
+ 57
469
+ ],
470
+ [
471
+ "Line",
472
+ 27
473
+ ],
474
+ [
475
+ "Text",
476
+ 4
477
+ ],
478
+ [
479
+ "Footnote",
480
+ 3
481
+ ],
482
+ [
483
+ "PageFooter",
484
+ 2
485
+ ],
486
+ [
487
+ "PageHeader",
488
+ 1
489
+ ],
490
+ [
491
+ "SectionHeader",
492
+ 1
493
+ ]
494
+ ],
495
+ "block_metadata": {
496
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
497
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
498
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
499
+ "previous_text": "",
500
+ "previous_type": "",
501
+ "previous_order": 0
502
+ }
503
+ },
504
+ {
505
+ "page_id": 3,
506
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
507
+ "block_counts": [
508
+ [
509
+ "Span",
510
+ 56
511
+ ],
512
+ [
513
+ "Line",
514
+ 29
515
+ ],
516
+ [
517
+ "Text",
518
+ 3
519
+ ],
520
+ [
521
+ "PageFooter",
522
+ 2
523
+ ],
524
+ [
525
+ "PageHeader",
526
+ 1
527
+ ],
528
+ [
529
+ "SectionHeader",
530
+ 1
531
+ ]
532
+ ],
533
+ "block_metadata": {
534
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
535
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
536
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
537
+ "previous_text": "",
538
+ "previous_type": "",
539
+ "previous_order": 0
540
+ }
541
+ },
542
+ {
543
+ "page_id": 4,
544
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
545
+ "block_counts": [
546
+ [
547
+ "Span",
548
+ 43
549
+ ],
550
+ [
551
+ "Line",
552
+ 22
553
+ ],
554
+ [
555
+ "Text",
556
+ 3
557
+ ],
558
+ [
559
+ "PageFooter",
560
+ 2
561
+ ],
562
+ [
563
+ "PageHeader",
564
+ 1
565
+ ],
566
+ [
567
+ "SectionHeader",
568
+ 1
569
+ ]
570
+ ],
571
+ "block_metadata": {
572
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
573
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
574
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
575
+ "previous_text": "",
576
+ "previous_type": "",
577
+ "previous_order": 0
578
+ }
579
+ },
580
+ {
581
+ "page_id": 5,
582
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
583
+ "block_counts": [
584
+ [
585
+ "Span",
586
+ 41
587
+ ],
588
+ [
589
+ "Line",
590
+ 20
591
+ ],
592
+ [
593
+ "Text",
594
+ 3
595
+ ],
596
+ [
597
+ "SectionHeader",
598
+ 2
599
+ ],
600
+ [
601
+ "PageFooter",
602
+ 2
603
+ ],
604
+ [
605
+ "PageHeader",
606
+ 1
607
+ ]
608
+ ],
609
+ "block_metadata": {
610
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
611
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
612
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
613
+ "previous_text": "",
614
+ "previous_type": "",
615
+ "previous_order": 0
616
+ }
617
+ },
618
+ {
619
+ "page_id": 6,
620
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
621
+ "block_counts": [
622
+ [
623
+ "Span",
624
+ 53
625
+ ],
626
+ [
627
+ "Line",
628
+ 25
629
+ ],
630
+ [
631
+ "SectionHeader",
632
+ 3
633
+ ],
634
+ [
635
+ "Text",
636
+ 3
637
+ ],
638
+ [
639
+ "PageFooter",
640
+ 2
641
+ ],
642
+ [
643
+ "PageHeader",
644
+ 1
645
+ ],
646
+ [
647
+ "Footnote",
648
+ 1
649
+ ]
650
+ ],
651
+ "block_metadata": {
652
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
653
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
654
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
655
+ "previous_text": "",
656
+ "previous_type": "",
657
+ "previous_order": 0
658
+ }
659
+ },
660
+ {
661
+ "page_id": 7,
662
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
663
+ "block_counts": [
664
+ [
665
+ "Span",
666
+ 41
667
+ ],
668
+ [
669
+ "Line",
670
+ 21
671
+ ],
672
+ [
673
+ "Text",
674
+ 4
675
+ ],
676
+ [
677
+ "PageFooter",
678
+ 2
679
+ ],
680
+ [
681
+ "PageHeader",
682
+ 1
683
+ ],
684
+ [
685
+ "SectionHeader",
686
+ 1
687
+ ]
688
+ ],
689
+ "block_metadata": {
690
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
691
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
692
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
693
+ "previous_text": "",
694
+ "previous_type": "",
695
+ "previous_order": 0
696
+ }
697
+ },
698
+ {
699
+ "page_id": 8,
700
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
701
+ "block_counts": [
702
+ [
703
+ "Span",
704
+ 41
705
+ ],
706
+ [
707
+ "Line",
708
+ 21
709
+ ],
710
+ [
711
+ "SectionHeader",
712
+ 2
713
+ ],
714
+ [
715
+ "Text",
716
+ 2
717
+ ],
718
+ [
719
+ "PageFooter",
720
+ 2
721
+ ],
722
+ [
723
+ "PageHeader",
724
+ 1
725
+ ]
726
+ ],
727
+ "block_metadata": {
728
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
729
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
730
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
731
+ "previous_text": "",
732
+ "previous_type": "",
733
+ "previous_order": 0
734
+ }
735
+ },
736
+ {
737
+ "page_id": 9,
738
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
739
+ "block_counts": [
740
+ [
741
+ "Span",
742
+ 39
743
+ ],
744
+ [
745
+ "Line",
746
+ 20
747
+ ],
748
+ [
749
+ "Text",
750
+ 7
751
+ ],
752
+ [
753
+ "PageFooter",
754
+ 2
755
+ ],
756
+ [
757
+ "PageHeader",
758
+ 1
759
+ ]
760
+ ],
761
+ "block_metadata": {
762
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
763
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
764
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
765
+ "previous_text": "",
766
+ "previous_type": "",
767
+ "previous_order": 0
768
+ }
769
+ },
770
+ {
771
+ "page_id": 10,
772
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
773
+ "block_counts": [
774
+ [
775
+ "Span",
776
+ 43
777
+ ],
778
+ [
779
+ "Line",
780
+ 22
781
+ ],
782
+ [
783
+ "Text",
784
+ 7
785
+ ],
786
+ [
787
+ "SectionHeader",
788
+ 2
789
+ ],
790
+ [
791
+ "PageFooter",
792
+ 2
793
+ ],
794
+ [
795
+ "PageHeader",
796
+ 1
797
+ ]
798
+ ],
799
+ "block_metadata": {
800
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
801
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
802
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
803
+ "previous_text": "",
804
+ "previous_type": "",
805
+ "previous_order": 0
806
+ }
807
+ }
808
+ ],
809
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739246"
810
+ }
811
+ }
marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739257/EFTA02739257.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ #### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
2
+
3
+ CASE NO.. 08-CV-80232—MARRAH
4
+
5
+ JANE DOE NO. 3,
6
+
7
+ Plaintiff,
8
+
9
+ vs.
10
+
11
+ JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
12
+
13
+ Defendant.
14
+
15
+ # DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR STAY
16
+
17
+ Defendant Jeffrey Epstein respectfully moves for a mandatory stay of this action under Title 18, United States Code, Section 3509(k). As discussed below, this action is subject to a mandatory stay based on the existence of two pending parallel criminal actions.
18
+
19
+ # Introduction
20
+
21
+ This civil action is a private counterpart to two ongoing criminal actions, one in Palm Beach state court, the other in Miami federal court. Both cases purport to arise from the same occurrence: the alleged sexual assault of a minor, Jane Doe No. 3. A federal statute directly on point provides that when an alleged sexual assault involving a child victim results in a "criminal proceeding," a commonly
22
+
23
+ derived civil suit "shall be stayed until the end of all phases of the criminal action." 18 U.S.C. § 3509(k) (emphasis added).' A stay of this case is required until there is no longer a pending criminal action derived from the same underlying allegations. See 18 U.S.C. § 3509(k).
24
+
25
+ ### Discussion
26
+
27
+ The parallel state criminal action pending in Palm Beach Circuit Court is still in the discovery phase. State of Florida v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 2006 CF 09454 AXX (Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County). Meanwhile, there is also a parallel federal criminal grand jury action pending in the Southern District of Florida. In re Grand Jury, No. FGJ 07-103(WPB) (S.D. Fla.) Both cases arise out of the same occurrence and allege that the minor plaintiff is a victim.
28
+
29
+ The language-of section 3509(k) of title 18, United States Code, is clear: a parallel "civil action shall be stayed until the end of all phases of the criminal
30
+
31
+ If, at any time that a cause of action for recovery of compensation for damage or injury to the person of a child exists, a criminal action is pending which arises out of the same occurrence and in which the child is the victim, the civil action shall be stayed until the end of all phases of the criminal action and any mention of the civil action during the criminal proceeding is prohibited. As used in this subsection, a criminal action is pending until its final adjudication in the trial court.
32
+
33
+ The full text of the mandatory-stay provision reads:
34
+
35
+ <sup>18</sup> U.S.C. § 3509(k).
36
+
37
+ action." 18 U.S.C.. § 3509(k) (emphasis added). When it comes to statutory construction, the mandatory nature of the word "shall" is well-settled. See, e.g., .= 531 U.S. 230, 241 (2001) (noting Congress' "use of a mandatory `shall' to impose discretionless obligations") (emphasis added); Lexecon Inc. v. Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach, 523 U.S. 26, 35 (1998) (explaining that "the mandatory `shall' . . . normally creates an obligation impervious to judicial discretion") (emphasis added). Cf. \_My. .= 530 U.S. 327, 350 (2000) ("Through the PLRA [Prison Litigation Reform Act], Congress clearly intended to make operation of the automatic stay mandatory, precluding courts from exercising their equitable powers to enjoin the stay. And we conclude that this provision does not violate separation of powers principles.") (emphasis added).
38
+
39
+ One district court within the Eleventh Circuit, facing the identical issue with a pending state prosecution, recently construed "the plain language of § 3509(k)" as "requiling] a stay in a case . . . where . . . a parallel criminal action [is] pending." Doe v. Francis, No. 5:03 CV 260 MCR/WCS, 2005 WL 950623, at \*2 (N.D. Fla. Apr. 20, 2005) (Francis II) (emphasis added). Accord Doe v. Francis, No. 5:03 CV 260 MCR/WCS, 2005 WL 517847, at \*1-2 (N.D. Fla. Feb. 10, 2005) (Francis 1) (staying federal civil action in favor of "a criminal case currently pending in state court in Bay County, Florida, arising from the same facts and involving the same parties as the Instant action," noting that "the language of 18
40
+
41
+ U.S.C. § 3509(k) is clear that a stay is required in a case such as this where a parallel criminal action is pending which arises from the same occurrence involving minor victims") (emphasis added). There is no contrary opinion from any court.
42
+
43
+ In determining that the federal stay provision is mandatory, the Francis II court expressed that there was apparently no case law supporting, or even "discussing the [avoidance] of a stay [under the command of] § 3509(k)." Francis II, 2005 WL 950623, at \*2. Deferring to the statute as written, the Francis H court rejected the plaintiffs' argument that some of the alleged victims had already reached their majority. See id. The court similarly rejected the plaintiffs' argument that it would be in the victims' best interests to avoid a stay so as to counteract the victims' "ongoing and increasing mental harm due to the `frustrating delay in both the criminal case and [the civil] case.' Id. The Francis H court, in adhering to the plain language of the statute, also adhered to the "well established priority of criminal proceedings over civil proceedings." Cf. United States v. Hanhardt, 156 F. Supp. 2d 988, 1000 (N.D. Ill. 2001) (citing Fed. R. Crim. P. 50(a)).
44
+
45
+ #### Conclusion
46
+
47
+ Because this civil action arises from the same allegations as two pending criminal actions, § 3509(k) mandates a stay of this civil action.
48
+
49
+ WHEREFORE, Defendant Jeffrey Epstein respectfully requests that the Court enter a stay under 18 U.S.C. § 3509(k), coextensive with the state and federal criminal actions.
50
+
51
+ Respectfully submitted,
52
+
53
+ ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER & WEISS, P.A.
54
+
55
+ 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Tel: 561 659 8300 Fax: 561 835 8691
56
+
57
+ By: /s/ Jack A. Goldberger Jack A. Goldberger Fla. Bar No. 262013 jgoldberger@agwpa.com
58
+
59
+ Attorneys for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
60
+
61
+ # CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL RULE 7
62
+
63
+ Counsel for defendant has conferred in good faith with counsel for the plaintiff, who opposes the relief requested in this motion.
64
+
65
+ /s/ Jack A. Goldberger
66
+
67
+ Jack A. Goldberger
68
+
69
+ #### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
70
+
71
+ I HEREBY CERTIFY that on June 20, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on counsel of record identified below by facsimile and U.S. Mail.
72
+
73
+ Jeffrey M. Herman, Esq. Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Herman & Mermelstein, P.A. 18205 Biscayne Blvd, Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160 Fax: 305 931 0877
74
+
75
+ /s/ Jack A. Goldberger
76
+
77
+ Jack A. Goldberger
marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739257/EFTA02739257.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,410 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739257.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 6,
15
+ "chars": 6541,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 0.97,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 186.66,
27
+ 68.03999999999999
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 417.7316589355469,
31
+ 68.03999999999999
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 417.7316589355469,
35
+ 103.24591064453125
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 186.66,
39
+ 103.24591064453125
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR STAY",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 181.17,
50
+ 342.63
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 421.9034118652344,
54
+ 342.63
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 421.9034118652344,
58
+ 361.6259460449219
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 181.17,
62
+ 361.6259460449219
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ },
66
+ {
67
+ "title": "Introduction",
68
+ "heading_level": null,
69
+ "page_id": 0,
70
+ "polygon": [
71
+ [
72
+ 259.25,
73
+ 503.82
74
+ ],
75
+ [
76
+ 342.2320556640625,
77
+ 503.82
78
+ ],
79
+ [
80
+ 342.2320556640625,
81
+ 522.4959411621094
82
+ ],
83
+ [
84
+ 259.25,
85
+ 522.4959411621094
86
+ ]
87
+ ]
88
+ },
89
+ {
90
+ "title": "Discussion",
91
+ "heading_level": null,
92
+ "page_id": 1,
93
+ "polygon": [
94
+ [
95
+ 267.18,
96
+ 198.45000000000002
97
+ ],
98
+ [
99
+ 337.4374694824219,
100
+ 198.45000000000002
101
+ ],
102
+ [
103
+ 337.4374694824219,
104
+ 216.86590576171875
105
+ ],
106
+ [
107
+ 267.18,
108
+ 216.86590576171875
109
+ ]
110
+ ]
111
+ },
112
+ {
113
+ "title": "Conclusion",
114
+ "heading_level": null,
115
+ "page_id": 3,
116
+ "polygon": [
117
+ [
118
+ 281.82,
119
+ 617.22
120
+ ],
121
+ [
122
+ 354.76983642578125,
123
+ 617.22
124
+ ],
125
+ [
126
+ 354.76983642578125,
127
+ 634.2559509277344
128
+ ],
129
+ [
130
+ 281.82,
131
+ 634.2559509277344
132
+ ]
133
+ ]
134
+ },
135
+ {
136
+ "title": "CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL RULE 7",
137
+ "heading_level": null,
138
+ "page_id": 5,
139
+ "polygon": [
140
+ [
141
+ 103.70000000000002,
142
+ 84.24
143
+ ],
144
+ [
145
+ 476.222900390625,
146
+ 84.24
147
+ ],
148
+ [
149
+ 476.222900390625,
150
+ 102.87591552734375
151
+ ],
152
+ [
153
+ 103.70000000000002,
154
+ 102.87591552734375
155
+ ]
156
+ ]
157
+ },
158
+ {
159
+ "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
160
+ "heading_level": null,
161
+ "page_id": 5,
162
+ "polygon": [
163
+ [
164
+ 204.35000000000002,
165
+ 262.44
166
+ ],
167
+ [
168
+ 395.7105407714844,
169
+ 262.44
170
+ ],
171
+ [
172
+ 395.7105407714844,
173
+ 280.2459411621094
174
+ ],
175
+ [
176
+ 204.35000000000002,
177
+ 280.2459411621094
178
+ ]
179
+ ]
180
+ }
181
+ ],
182
+ "page_stats": [
183
+ {
184
+ "page_id": 0,
185
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
186
+ "block_counts": [
187
+ [
188
+ "Span",
189
+ 41
190
+ ],
191
+ [
192
+ "Line",
193
+ 21
194
+ ],
195
+ [
196
+ "Text",
197
+ 8
198
+ ],
199
+ [
200
+ "SectionHeader",
201
+ 3
202
+ ],
203
+ [
204
+ "PageHeader",
205
+ 1
206
+ ],
207
+ [
208
+ "PageFooter",
209
+ 1
210
+ ]
211
+ ],
212
+ "block_metadata": {
213
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
214
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
215
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
216
+ "previous_text": "",
217
+ "previous_type": "",
218
+ "previous_order": 0
219
+ }
220
+ },
221
+ {
222
+ "page_id": 1,
223
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
224
+ "block_counts": [
225
+ [
226
+ "Span",
227
+ 49
228
+ ],
229
+ [
230
+ "Line",
231
+ 25
232
+ ],
233
+ [
234
+ "Text",
235
+ 4
236
+ ],
237
+ [
238
+ "Footnote",
239
+ 2
240
+ ],
241
+ [
242
+ "PageFooter",
243
+ 2
244
+ ],
245
+ [
246
+ "PageHeader",
247
+ 1
248
+ ],
249
+ [
250
+ "SectionHeader",
251
+ 1
252
+ ]
253
+ ],
254
+ "block_metadata": {
255
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
256
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
257
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
258
+ "previous_text": "",
259
+ "previous_type": "",
260
+ "previous_order": 0
261
+ }
262
+ },
263
+ {
264
+ "page_id": 2,
265
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
266
+ "block_counts": [
267
+ [
268
+ "Span",
269
+ 43
270
+ ],
271
+ [
272
+ "Line",
273
+ 22
274
+ ],
275
+ [
276
+ "Text",
277
+ 2
278
+ ],
279
+ [
280
+ "PageFooter",
281
+ 2
282
+ ],
283
+ [
284
+ "PageHeader",
285
+ 1
286
+ ]
287
+ ],
288
+ "block_metadata": {
289
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
290
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
291
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
292
+ "previous_text": "",
293
+ "previous_type": "",
294
+ "previous_order": 0
295
+ }
296
+ },
297
+ {
298
+ "page_id": 3,
299
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
300
+ "block_counts": [
301
+ [
302
+ "Span",
303
+ 45
304
+ ],
305
+ [
306
+ "Line",
307
+ 23
308
+ ],
309
+ [
310
+ "Text",
311
+ 3
312
+ ],
313
+ [
314
+ "PageFooter",
315
+ 2
316
+ ],
317
+ [
318
+ "PageHeader",
319
+ 1
320
+ ],
321
+ [
322
+ "SectionHeader",
323
+ 1
324
+ ]
325
+ ],
326
+ "block_metadata": {
327
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
328
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
329
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
330
+ "previous_text": "",
331
+ "previous_type": "",
332
+ "previous_order": 0
333
+ }
334
+ },
335
+ {
336
+ "page_id": 4,
337
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
338
+ "block_counts": [
339
+ [
340
+ "Span",
341
+ 35
342
+ ],
343
+ [
344
+ "Line",
345
+ 18
346
+ ],
347
+ [
348
+ "Text",
349
+ 6
350
+ ],
351
+ [
352
+ "PageFooter",
353
+ 2
354
+ ],
355
+ [
356
+ "PageHeader",
357
+ 1
358
+ ]
359
+ ],
360
+ "block_metadata": {
361
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
362
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
363
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
364
+ "previous_text": "",
365
+ "previous_type": "",
366
+ "previous_order": 0
367
+ }
368
+ },
369
+ {
370
+ "page_id": 5,
371
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
372
+ "block_counts": [
373
+ [
374
+ "Span",
375
+ 43
376
+ ],
377
+ [
378
+ "Line",
379
+ 22
380
+ ],
381
+ [
382
+ "Text",
383
+ 7
384
+ ],
385
+ [
386
+ "SectionHeader",
387
+ 2
388
+ ],
389
+ [
390
+ "PageFooter",
391
+ 2
392
+ ],
393
+ [
394
+ "PageHeader",
395
+ 1
396
+ ]
397
+ ],
398
+ "block_metadata": {
399
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
400
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
401
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
402
+ "previous_text": "",
403
+ "previous_type": "",
404
+ "previous_order": 0
405
+ }
406
+ }
407
+ ],
408
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739257"
409
+ }
410
+ }
marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739263/EFTA02739263.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ #### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
2
+
3
+ CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232—MARRAH
4
+
5
+ JANE DOE NO. 3,
6
+
7
+ Plaintiff,
8
+
9
+ vs.
10
+
11
+ JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
12
+
13
+ Defendant.
14
+
15
+ ### DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
16
+
17
+ Defendant Jeffrey Epstein moves, pursuant to S.D. Fla. L.R. 7.1(A), for an enlargement of time to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint until ten days after his motion for a mandatory stay, filed contemporaneously with this motion, is decided, and as grounds for this relief respectfully states as follows:
18
+
19
+ - 1. This civil action is a private counterpart to two ongoing criminal actions, one in Palm Beach state court, the other in the Southern District of Florida.
20
+ - 2. These cases purport to arise from the same occurrence: the alleged sexual assault of a minor, Jane Doe No. 3.
21
+ - 3. On June 20, 2008, Mr. Epstein filed a motion seeking a stay of this action under 18 U.S.C. § 3509. Under that section, when an alleged sexual assault
22
+
23
+ involving a child victim results in a "criminal proceeding," a commonly derived civil suit "shall be stayed until the end of all phases of the criminal action." 18 U.S.C. § 3509(k) (emphasis added).
24
+
25
+ 4. If Mr. Epstein's stay motion is granted, he will not be required to respond to the Complaint or otherwise litigate this action until the two pending criminal matters are resolved.
26
+
27
+ WHEREFORE, Defendant Jeffrey Epstein respectfully requests an enlargement of time to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint until ten days after his motion for a stay is decided.
28
+
29
+ Respectfully submitted,
30
+
31
+ ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER & WEISS, P.A.
32
+
33
+ 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Tel: 561 659 8300 Fax: 561 835 8691
34
+
35
+ By: /s/ Jack A. Goldberger Jack A. Goldberger Fla. Bar No. 262013 j goldberger@agwpa.com
36
+
37
+ Attorneys for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
38
+
39
+ # CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL RULE 7
40
+
41
+ Counsel for defendant has conferred in good faith with counsel for the plaintiff, who opposes the relief requested in this motion.
42
+
43
+ /s/ Jack A. Goldberger
44
+
45
+ Jack A. Goldberger
46
+
47
+ # CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
48
+
49
+ I HEREBY CERTIFY that on June 20, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on counsel of record identified below by facsimile and U.S. Mail.
50
+
51
+ Jeffrey M. Herman, Esq. Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Herman & Mermelstein, P.A. 18205 Biscayne Blvd, Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160 Fax: 305 931 0877
52
+
53
+ /s/ Jack A. Goldberger
54
+
55
+ Jack A. Goldberger
56
+
57
+ #### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
58
+
59
+ CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232—MARRA—:
60
+
61
+ JANE DOE NO. 3,
62
+
63
+ Plaintiff,
64
+
65
+ vs.
66
+
67
+ JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
68
+
69
+ Defendant.
70
+
71
+ ### ORDER
72
+
73
+ THIS CAUSE having come to be heard on the Defendant's Motion for An Enlargement of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint, and this Court being fully advised, it is hereby:
74
+
75
+ ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion is hereby granted.
76
+
77
+ DONE AND ORDERED in Miami-Dade County, Florida this day of , 2008.
78
+
79
+ > KENNETH A. MARRA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
80
+
81
+ Copies furnished to: Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. Jeffrey M. Herman, Esq.
marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739263/EFTA02739263.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,319 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739263.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 4,
15
+ "chars": 3197,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 0.93,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 186.66,
27
+ 68.03999999999999
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 417.7193603515625,
31
+ 68.03999999999999
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 417.7193603515625,
35
+ 102.49591064453125
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 186.66,
39
+ 102.49591064453125
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF \nTIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 88.45,
50
+ 341.82
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 516.2113647460938,
54
+ 341.82
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 516.2113647460938,
58
+ 376.9959411621094
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 88.45,
62
+ 376.9959411621094
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ },
66
+ {
67
+ "title": "CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL RULE 7",
68
+ "heading_level": null,
69
+ "page_id": 2,
70
+ "polygon": [
71
+ [
72
+ 117.12,
73
+ 67.23
74
+ ],
75
+ [
76
+ 490.472900390625,
77
+ 67.23
78
+ ],
79
+ [
80
+ 490.472900390625,
81
+ 86.37591552734375
82
+ ],
83
+ [
84
+ 117.12,
85
+ 86.37591552734375
86
+ ]
87
+ ]
88
+ },
89
+ {
90
+ "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
91
+ "heading_level": null,
92
+ "page_id": 2,
93
+ "polygon": [
94
+ [
95
+ 205.57000000000002,
96
+ 244.61999999999998
97
+ ],
98
+ [
99
+ 397.2105407714844,
100
+ 244.61999999999998
101
+ ],
102
+ [
103
+ 397.2105407714844,
104
+ 263.74591064453125
105
+ ],
106
+ [
107
+ 205.57000000000002,
108
+ 263.74591064453125
109
+ ]
110
+ ]
111
+ },
112
+ {
113
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
114
+ "heading_level": null,
115
+ "page_id": 3,
116
+ "polygon": [
117
+ [
118
+ 187.88000000000002,
119
+ 68.03999999999999
120
+ ],
121
+ [
122
+ 418.4716491699219,
123
+ 68.03999999999999
124
+ ],
125
+ [
126
+ 418.4716491699219,
127
+ 102.11590576171875
128
+ ],
129
+ [
130
+ 187.88000000000002,
131
+ 102.11590576171875
132
+ ]
133
+ ]
134
+ },
135
+ {
136
+ "title": "ORDER",
137
+ "heading_level": null,
138
+ "page_id": 3,
139
+ "polygon": [
140
+ [
141
+ 273.89000000000004,
142
+ 342.63
143
+ ],
144
+ [
145
+ 330.9102783203125,
146
+ 342.63
147
+ ],
148
+ [
149
+ 330.9102783203125,
150
+ 360.4959411621094
151
+ ],
152
+ [
153
+ 273.89000000000004,
154
+ 360.4959411621094
155
+ ]
156
+ ]
157
+ }
158
+ ],
159
+ "page_stats": [
160
+ {
161
+ "page_id": 0,
162
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
163
+ "block_counts": [
164
+ [
165
+ "Span",
166
+ 43
167
+ ],
168
+ [
169
+ "Line",
170
+ 22
171
+ ],
172
+ [
173
+ "Text",
174
+ 7
175
+ ],
176
+ [
177
+ "ListItem",
178
+ 3
179
+ ],
180
+ [
181
+ "SectionHeader",
182
+ 2
183
+ ],
184
+ [
185
+ "PageHeader",
186
+ 1
187
+ ],
188
+ [
189
+ "ListGroup",
190
+ 1
191
+ ],
192
+ [
193
+ "PageFooter",
194
+ 1
195
+ ]
196
+ ],
197
+ "block_metadata": {
198
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
199
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
200
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
201
+ "previous_text": "",
202
+ "previous_type": "",
203
+ "previous_order": 0
204
+ }
205
+ },
206
+ {
207
+ "page_id": 1,
208
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
209
+ "block_counts": [
210
+ [
211
+ "Span",
212
+ 47
213
+ ],
214
+ [
215
+ "Line",
216
+ 24
217
+ ],
218
+ [
219
+ "Text",
220
+ 8
221
+ ],
222
+ [
223
+ "PageFooter",
224
+ 2
225
+ ],
226
+ [
227
+ "PageHeader",
228
+ 1
229
+ ]
230
+ ],
231
+ "block_metadata": {
232
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
233
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
234
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
235
+ "previous_text": "",
236
+ "previous_type": "",
237
+ "previous_order": 0
238
+ }
239
+ },
240
+ {
241
+ "page_id": 2,
242
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
243
+ "block_counts": [
244
+ [
245
+ "Span",
246
+ 43
247
+ ],
248
+ [
249
+ "Line",
250
+ 22
251
+ ],
252
+ [
253
+ "Text",
254
+ 7
255
+ ],
256
+ [
257
+ "SectionHeader",
258
+ 2
259
+ ],
260
+ [
261
+ "PageFooter",
262
+ 2
263
+ ],
264
+ [
265
+ "PageHeader",
266
+ 1
267
+ ]
268
+ ],
269
+ "block_metadata": {
270
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
271
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
272
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
273
+ "previous_text": "",
274
+ "previous_type": "",
275
+ "previous_order": 0
276
+ }
277
+ },
278
+ {
279
+ "page_id": 3,
280
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
281
+ "block_counts": [
282
+ [
283
+ "Span",
284
+ 41
285
+ ],
286
+ [
287
+ "Line",
288
+ 21
289
+ ],
290
+ [
291
+ "Text",
292
+ 12
293
+ ],
294
+ [
295
+ "SectionHeader",
296
+ 2
297
+ ],
298
+ [
299
+ "PageHeader",
300
+ 1
301
+ ],
302
+ [
303
+ "PageFooter",
304
+ 1
305
+ ]
306
+ ],
307
+ "block_metadata": {
308
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
309
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
310
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
311
+ "previous_text": "",
312
+ "previous_type": "",
313
+ "previous_order": 0
314
+ }
315
+ }
316
+ ],
317
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739263"
318
+ }
319
+ }
marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739267/EFTA02739267.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
2
+
3
+ CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA
4
+
5
+ JANE DOE NO. 3,
6
+
7
+ Plaintiff, vs.
8
+
9
+ JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
10
+
11
+ Defendant.
12
+
13
+ # REPLY MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR ENTRY OF CLERK'S DEFAULT
14
+
15
+ Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 3, by and through her undersigned counsel, submits this Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion for Entry of Clerk's Default, as follows:
16
+
17
+ # Introduction
18
+
19
+ Defendant Jeffrey Epstein claims that service of process on him was ineffective under Florida or Federal law, based solely on a "bare bones" affidavit that raises more questions than it answers. At a minimum, the issue of whether service was effective under Florida or Federal law is at this point one of fact which should be the subject of discovery.
20
+
21
+ #### The Affidavit Attached to the Defendant's Response to the Motion is Insufficient
22
+
23
+ Service of process was effected at Jeffrey Epstein's New York residence on May 7, 2008, at 7:45 a.m. by handing a copy of the Summons and Complaint to a person in Defendant's residence who refused to identify himself. (See Affidavit of Service). Defendant now attaches to his Response as Exhibit "A" the Affidavit of Richard Barnett, who claims to have received the copies of the Summons and Complaint on May 7, 2008 at Defendant Epstein's residence. In this Affidavit,
24
+
25
+ Mr. Barnett states very little. He asserts that he does not now, nor has he ever, resided at 9 E. 71st Street, New York, New York (Mr. Epstein's residence). He fails to state in this Affidavit, however, where he does live, if not at the residence in question; what he was doing at the subject address when service was made; his relationship with Defendant Epstein, and how often he was at the residence; or why he refused to identify himself to the process server. He also fails to state who instructed him to answer the door on May 7, 2008 and take service anonymously.
26
+
27
+ The Court may grant limited discovery on the issue of service of process. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico v. SS Zoc Colocotroni 61 F.R.D. 653, 656-57 (D.P.R. 1974) ("discovery regarding the legal sufficiency of service of process so as to acquire in personam jurisdiction over the person of a defendant is permitted by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, specifically Rule 26"). See also Blair v. City of Worcester, 522 F.3d 105, Ill (1st Cir. 2008); Monteiro v. San Nicolas, S.A., 254 F.2d 514, 516-17 (2d Cir. 1958) (holding that discovery was appropriate on disputed issues of service of process). The parties do not dispute that if the person who in fact received the copies of the summons and complaint resided at the residence, then service would have been valid under Florida or Federal law on May 7, 2008.1 See National Development Co. v. Triad Holding Corp. 930 F.2d 253 (2d Cir. 1991) (upholding service of process on housekeeper of defendant's New York apartment, under Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(d)(1) [now 4(e)(2)], because the defendant was actually living in the apartment at the time service was effected). Alternatively, if the difficulties encountered in
28
+
29
+ <sup>&#</sup>x27; Defendant notes that under Rule 4(e) there is no priority between alternative methods of service. This means that Plaintiff has the option of perfecting service under either federal law, the law of the forum state, or the law of the state where service is made: "Either may be turned to with no attempted prior resort to the other." Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 (Commentary C4-22). It does not stand, however, for the proposition that the defendant can accept service under New York law, while ignoring valid service under Florida or Federal law. Accordingly, once valid service was made on Defendant Epstein under Federal or Florida law on May 7, 2008, Defendant was required to answer to otherwise respond to the Complaint by May 27, 2008 to avoid default, which he failed to do.
30
+
31
+ serving Mr. Epstein were the result of Mr. Epstein's deliberate avoidance or deception, while knowing of the lawsuit, then it would likewise be appropriate to find good service and a default. deg
32
+
33
+ Keevan & Son , Inc. v. Callier Pipe & Tube, Inc., 107 F.R.C. 665, 671-72 (S.D. Fl.a. 1985) ("[e]ffective service is most likely found when a defendant has engaged in deception to avoid service of process"). Based on what Mr. Bamett's Affidavit does not disclose, Plaintiff should be granted discovery to determine whether service was proper under Florida or Federal law. Plaintiff would at a minimum like to take the depositions of Mr. Barnett and Mr. Epstein with regard to the service of process issues that have arisen in this matter.
34
+
35
+ # Conclusion
36
+
37
+ Based on the foregoing, Plaintiff requests that this Court allow Plaintiff to take discovery on the issue of service of process; conduct an evidentiary hearing on the validity of service under Florida or Federal law; enter an Order compelling the Clerk to enter a default against Defendant Epstein pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 55(a); and such other and further relief as this Court deems proper.
38
+
39
+ Dated: June 24, 2008. Respectfully submitted,
40
+
41
+ By: s/ Jeffrey M. Herman
42
+
43
+ Jeffrey M. Herman (FL Bar No. 521647)
44
+
45
+ jherman@hermanlaw.com
46
+
47
+ Stuart S. Mermelstein (FL Bar No. 947245)
48
+
49
+ ssm@hermanlaw.com
50
+
51
+ Adam D. Horowitz (FL Bar No. 376980)
52
+
53
+ ahorowitz@hermanlaw.com
54
+
55
+ HERMAN & MERMELSTEIN, P.A.
56
+
57
+ Attorneys for Plaintiffs Jane Doe
58
+
59
+ 18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218
60
+
61
+ Miami, Florida 33160
62
+
63
+ Tel: 305-931-2200
64
+
65
+ Fax: 305-931-0877
66
+
67
+ # CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
68
+
69
+ I hereby certify that on June 24, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing document NA it li the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day to all parties on the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those parties who are not authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing.
70
+
71
+ Is/ Jeffrey M. Herman
72
+
73
+ ## SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA/ffi United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
74
+
75
+ Jack Alan Goldberger jagesq@bellsouth.net
76
+
77
+ /s/Jeffery M. Herman
marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739267/EFTA02739267.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,376 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739267.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 5,
15
+ "chars": 6113,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 1.31,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 206.24400000000003,
27
+ 85.85999999999999
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 406.3231201171875,
31
+ 85.85999999999999
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 406.3231201171875,
35
+ 115.18353271484375
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 206.24400000000003,
39
+ 115.18353271484375
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "REPLY MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF \nMOTION FOR ENTRY OF CLERK'S DEFAULT",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 173.19599999999997,
50
+ 295.65
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 439.49053955078125,
54
+ 295.65
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 439.49053955078125,
58
+ 325.10302734375
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 173.19599999999997,
62
+ 325.10302734375
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ },
66
+ {
67
+ "title": "Introduction",
68
+ "heading_level": null,
69
+ "page_id": 0,
70
+ "polygon": [
71
+ [
72
+ 271.116,
73
+ 393.65999999999997
74
+ ],
75
+ [
76
+ 340.27200000000005,
77
+ 393.65999999999997
78
+ ],
79
+ [
80
+ 340.27200000000005,
81
+ 409.10302734375
82
+ ],
83
+ [
84
+ 271.116,
85
+ 409.10302734375
86
+ ]
87
+ ]
88
+ },
89
+ {
90
+ "title": "The Affidavit Attached to the Defendant's \nResponse to the Motion is Insufficient",
91
+ "heading_level": null,
92
+ "page_id": 0,
93
+ "polygon": [
94
+ [
95
+ 195.228,
96
+ 533.79
97
+ ],
98
+ [
99
+ 417.45361328125,
100
+ 533.79
101
+ ],
102
+ [
103
+ 417.45361328125,
104
+ 562.5635223388672
105
+ ],
106
+ [
107
+ 195.228,
108
+ 562.5635223388672
109
+ ]
110
+ ]
111
+ },
112
+ {
113
+ "title": "Conclusion",
114
+ "heading_level": null,
115
+ "page_id": 2,
116
+ "polygon": [
117
+ [
118
+ 274.788,
119
+ 310.23
120
+ ],
121
+ [
122
+ 337.39495849609375,
123
+ 310.23
124
+ ],
125
+ [
126
+ 337.39495849609375,
127
+ 325.10302734375
128
+ ],
129
+ [
130
+ 274.788,
131
+ 325.10302734375
132
+ ]
133
+ ]
134
+ },
135
+ {
136
+ "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
137
+ "heading_level": null,
138
+ "page_id": 3,
139
+ "polygon": [
140
+ [
141
+ 227.052,
142
+ 85.85999999999999
143
+ ],
144
+ [
145
+ 385.0019836425781,
146
+ 85.85999999999999
147
+ ],
148
+ [
149
+ 385.0019836425781,
150
+ 100.863037109375
151
+ ],
152
+ [
153
+ 227.052,
154
+ 100.863037109375
155
+ ]
156
+ ]
157
+ },
158
+ {
159
+ "title": "SERVICE LIST \nDOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN \nCASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA/ffi \nUnited States District Court, Southern District of Florida",
160
+ "heading_level": null,
161
+ "page_id": 4,
162
+ "polygon": [
163
+ [
164
+ 157.28400000000002,
165
+ 85.05
166
+ ],
167
+ [
168
+ 455.1346740722656,
169
+ 85.05
170
+ ],
171
+ [
172
+ 455.1346740722656,
173
+ 143.68353271484375
174
+ ],
175
+ [
176
+ 157.28400000000002,
177
+ 143.68353271484375
178
+ ]
179
+ ]
180
+ }
181
+ ],
182
+ "page_stats": [
183
+ {
184
+ "page_id": 0,
185
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
186
+ "block_counts": [
187
+ [
188
+ "Span",
189
+ 59
190
+ ],
191
+ [
192
+ "Line",
193
+ 28
194
+ ],
195
+ [
196
+ "Text",
197
+ 8
198
+ ],
199
+ [
200
+ "SectionHeader",
201
+ 4
202
+ ],
203
+ [
204
+ "PageFooter",
205
+ 4
206
+ ],
207
+ [
208
+ "PageHeader",
209
+ 1
210
+ ]
211
+ ],
212
+ "block_metadata": {
213
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
214
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
215
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
216
+ "previous_text": "",
217
+ "previous_type": "",
218
+ "previous_order": 0
219
+ }
220
+ },
221
+ {
222
+ "page_id": 1,
223
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
224
+ "block_counts": [
225
+ [
226
+ "Span",
227
+ 70
228
+ ],
229
+ [
230
+ "Line",
231
+ 30
232
+ ],
233
+ [
234
+ "PageFooter",
235
+ 4
236
+ ],
237
+ [
238
+ "Text",
239
+ 2
240
+ ],
241
+ [
242
+ "PageHeader",
243
+ 1
244
+ ],
245
+ [
246
+ "Footnote",
247
+ 1
248
+ ]
249
+ ],
250
+ "block_metadata": {
251
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
252
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
253
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
254
+ "previous_text": "",
255
+ "previous_type": "",
256
+ "previous_order": 0
257
+ }
258
+ },
259
+ {
260
+ "page_id": 2,
261
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
262
+ "block_counts": [
263
+ [
264
+ "Span",
265
+ 63
266
+ ],
267
+ [
268
+ "Line",
269
+ 31
270
+ ],
271
+ [
272
+ "Text",
273
+ 18
274
+ ],
275
+ [
276
+ "PageFooter",
277
+ 4
278
+ ],
279
+ [
280
+ "PageHeader",
281
+ 1
282
+ ],
283
+ [
284
+ "SectionHeader",
285
+ 1
286
+ ]
287
+ ],
288
+ "block_metadata": {
289
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
290
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
291
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
292
+ "previous_text": "",
293
+ "previous_type": "",
294
+ "previous_order": 0
295
+ }
296
+ },
297
+ {
298
+ "page_id": 3,
299
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
300
+ "block_counts": [
301
+ [
302
+ "Span",
303
+ 24
304
+ ],
305
+ [
306
+ "Line",
307
+ 11
308
+ ],
309
+ [
310
+ "PageFooter",
311
+ 4
312
+ ],
313
+ [
314
+ "Text",
315
+ 2
316
+ ],
317
+ [
318
+ "PageHeader",
319
+ 1
320
+ ],
321
+ [
322
+ "SectionHeader",
323
+ 1
324
+ ]
325
+ ],
326
+ "block_metadata": {
327
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
328
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
329
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
330
+ "previous_text": "",
331
+ "previous_type": "",
332
+ "previous_order": 0
333
+ }
334
+ },
335
+ {
336
+ "page_id": 4,
337
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
338
+ "block_counts": [
339
+ [
340
+ "Span",
341
+ 24
342
+ ],
343
+ [
344
+ "Line",
345
+ 11
346
+ ],
347
+ [
348
+ "Text",
349
+ 3
350
+ ],
351
+ [
352
+ "PageFooter",
353
+ 3
354
+ ],
355
+ [
356
+ "PageHeader",
357
+ 1
358
+ ],
359
+ [
360
+ "SectionHeader",
361
+ 1
362
+ ]
363
+ ],
364
+ "block_metadata": {
365
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
366
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
367
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
368
+ "previous_text": "",
369
+ "previous_type": "",
370
+ "previous_order": 0
371
+ }
372
+ }
373
+ ],
374
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739267"
375
+ }
376
+ }
marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739272/EFTA02739272.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,183 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ## EXHIBIT A
2
+
3
+ DIV : NO
4
+ CASE NO : 5020000000000000 ST OF FL VS. JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN 241
5
+ Charges : FILED OFFER TO COMMIT PROSTITUTION
6
+
7
+ AGREEST & COMMENTARY RECORD DOCTIC COPIES OF 3,000 DO
8
+
9
+ Date 3/20/08 6/30/08 Judge PC III Ctr. Rep. C. DAFMIS
10
+ ASA L. Beloil AMWork DC PBO Int [redacted]
11
+ Deft---Pres / Not Pres. W / W/O Def. Co. G. O. D. Berger Esq / PD---Pres / Not Pres.
12
+ Before the Court for: Statuschool
13
+ Granted Denied With / Without Prejudice Withdrawn Court Reserves Ruling Written Order to Follow
14
+ Warrant Ordered Recalled Bond Set at \$ \_\_\_\_\_ See Below Also Covers Sp Cond
15
+ Bond Forf OR: Disch/Revoked/Reinstated Bond: Disch/Revoked SOR: Disch/Revoked/Reinstated
16
+ Bond Forf Vacated Previous Bond Reinstated, if Bondsman agrees State failed to file charges Released O.R. / S.O.R.
17
+ Deft \_\_\_ Indigent PD Appt Hrg only PD Pres \_\_\_\_\_ Court Appts \_\_\_\_\_
18
+ Evaluation for: Drug Farm DOC Non-Secure Bed by \_\_\_\_\_
19
+ Pre-Plea PSI ordered by/within \_\_\_\_\_ days w/input from DJJ / Staffing
20
+ Referred to: PTI / SAAP / PADD Case placed on the absentee docket
21
+ DEFT ENTERED A PLEA OF: NOT GUILTY GUILTY NO CONTEST BEST INTEREST TO THE COURT
22
+ As Charged-Cts O. N. L. Lesser Cts \_\_\_\_\_ Lesser Charge \_\_\_\_\_
23
+ Sw & Test Adv of Rts Waived PSI Lesser Cts \_\_\_\_\_ Lesser Charge \_\_\_\_\_
24
+ ADJ GUILTY as Charged as to Cts O. N. L. Lesser Cts \_\_\_\_\_
25
+ FOUND GUILTY as Charged as to Cts \_\_\_\_\_ Lesser Cts \_\_\_\_\_
26
+ ADJ W/HELD as to Cts \_\_\_\_\_ SENT W/HELD as to Cts \_\_\_\_\_
27
+ FOUND AND ADJUDICATED DELINQUENT as to Cts \_\_\_\_\_ Dismiss Nolle Prosse Cts \_\_\_\_\_ Dispo Order to follow / Filed
28
+ FOUND & ADJ NOT GUILTY as to Cts \_\_\_\_\_ Dismiss Nolle Prosse Cts \_\_\_\_\_
29
+ Prob / Comm Control: Revoked Reinstated Modified Term. Successfully / Unsuccessfully
30
+ Stip/Found: (violent) Habitual Off. 775.084 Stip/Found: Sexual Offender / Sexual Predator Stip/Found: P.R.R.
31
+ SENTENCE: PBCJ 12 MOS Cts: \_\_\_\_\_ / DOC: \_\_\_\_\_ Cts: \_\_\_\_\_
32
+ PBCJ: \_\_\_\_\_ Cts: \_\_\_\_\_ / DOC: \_\_\_\_\_ Cts: \_\_\_\_\_
33
+ W/Credit for \_\_\_\_\_ Days / Mes. / Yrs. Deft Remanded Deft to remain on same rel. status pending sent.
34
+ Conc / Consec / Co-Term w/cases / cts: \_\_\_\_\_
35
+ Execution of Sentence Stayed Sentence Suspended Time served as to Cts \_\_\_\_\_
36
+ Youthful Off Habitual Off Min / Mand: \_\_\_\_\_ as to Cts \_\_\_\_\_
37
+ ABOVE SENTENCE TO BE FOLLOWED By: Probation Drug / Sex Off Prob Comm. Control I II - See Pg. 2
38
+ DRIVERS LICENSE TO BE SUSPENDED / REVOKED FOR \_\_\_\_\_ YEARS AS A RESULT OF THIS PLEA.
39
+
40
+ DNA Swab
41
+
42
+ \_\_\_\_\_ Set / Remains Set / Reset \_\_\_\_\_ Div \_\_\_\_\_ Rm \_\_\_\_\_ at \_\_\_\_\_ AM/PM
43
+ \_\_\_\_\_ Set / Remains Set / Reset \_\_\_\_\_ Div \_\_\_\_\_ Rm \_\_\_\_\_ at \_\_\_\_\_ AM/PM
44
+ Deft sign \_\_\_\_\_
45
+ Def Co \_\_\_\_\_ ASA \_\_\_\_\_ Bondsman \_\_\_\_\_
46
+ Prob Jail DJJ GAL Notified by mail by: \_\_\_\_\_ on \_\_\_\_\_ / \_\_\_\_\_ / \_\_\_\_\_
47
+ County Courthouse 205 N. Dixie, West Palm Beach Courtroom, Criminal Justice Bldg. Courtroom, Criminal Justice Complex
48
+ 38544 State Road 80, Belle Glade 3228 Gun Club Rd., West Palm Beach
49
+
50
+ IF YOU ARE A PERSON WITH A DISABILITY WHO NEEDS ANY ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS PROCEEDING, YOU ARE ENTITLED, AT NO COST TO YOU, TO THE PROVISION OF CERTAIN ASSISTANCE. PLEASE CONTACT MARY JAFFE, ADA COORDINATOR IN THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE COURT, PALM BEACH COUNTY COURTHOUSE, 205 N. DIXIE HWY, RM 52500, WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401; TELEPHONE (561) 355-4380, WITHIN 2 WORKING DAYS OF YOUR RECEIPT OF THIS NOTICE. IF YOU ARE HEARING OR VOICE IMPAIRED, CALL 1-800-955-8771.
51
+
52
+ Case No.: 2006CF009361AXX W ST of FL vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN
53
+ Charges: PROCURE PERSON UNDER AGE OF 18 FOR PROSTITUTION
54
+ (ARIZES FROM 2006CF009454EXX)
55
+
56
+ Arrest# Bond# Type \$ A/C
57
+
58
+ Date Date Judge Crt. Rep. ASA DC Int Def. Co. Esq PD Pres / Not Pres.
59
+
60
+ Before the Court for: St. Holloway Mark
61
+
62
+ Granted Denied With / Without Prejudice Withdrawn Court Reserves Ruling Written Order to Follow
63
+
64
+ Warrant Ordered Recalled Bond Set at \$ See Below Also Covers Sp Cond
65
+ Bond Forf OR: Disch / Revoked / Reinstated Bond: Disch / Revoked SOR: Disch / Revoked / Reinstated
66
+ Bond Forf Vacated Previous Bond Reinstated, if Bondsman agrees State failed to file charges Released O.R. / S.O.R.
67
+
68
+ Deft Indigent PD Appt Hrg only PD Pres Court Appts
69
+
70
+ Evaluation for: Drug Farm DOC Non-Secure Bed by Pre-Plea PSI ordered by/within days w/input from DJJ / Staffing
71
+
72
+ Referred to: PTI / SAAP / PADD Case placed on the absentee docket
73
+
74
+ DEFT ENTERED A PLEA OF: NOT GUILTY GUILTY NO CONTEST BEST INTEREST TO THE COURT
75
+ As Charged-Cts Lesser Cts Lesser Charge
76
+ Sw & Test Adv of Rts Waived PSI Lesser Cts Lesser Charge
77
+
78
+ ADJ GUILTY as Charged as to Cts Lesser Cts
79
+
80
+ FOUND GUILTY as Charged as to Cts Lesser Cts
81
+
82
+ ADJ W/HELD as to Cts SENT W/HELD as to Cts
83
+
84
+ FOUND AND ADJUDICATED DELINQUENT as to Cts Dismiss Nolle Prosse Cts
85
+
86
+ Prob / Comm Control: Revoked Reinstated Modified. Term: Successfully / Unsuccessfully
87
+ Deft. to pay fine or complete hrs. Community Service or Serve days PBCJ.
88
+
89
+ Stip/Found: (violent) Habitual Off. 775.084 Stip/Found: Sexual Offender / Sexual Predator Stip/Found: P.R.R.
90
+ SENTENCE: PBCJ Cts: / DOC: Cts:
91
+ PBCJ: Cts: / DOC: Cts:
92
+
93
+ W/Credit for Days / Mos. / Yrs. Deft to remain on same rel. status pending sent.
94
+ Conc / Consec Co-Term w/cases / cts: 400 / 000 / 000 / 000
95
+
96
+ Execution of Sentence Stayed Sentence Suspended Time served as to Cts
97
+
98
+ Youthful Off Habitual Off Min / Mand: as to Cts
99
+ ABOVE SENTENCE TO BE FOLLOWED By: Probation Drug Off Prob Comm. Control I II - See Page 2
100
+
101
+ DUT SUMB
102
+
103
+ Set / Remains Set / Reset Div Rm at AM/PM
104
+
105
+ Set / Remains Set / Reset Div Rm at AM/PM
106
+
107
+ Deft sign ASA Bondsman
108
+
109
+ Def Co ASA Bondsman
110
+ Prob Jail DJJ. GAL Notified by mail by: on / / /
111
+
112
+ County Courthouse Courtroom, Criminal Justice Bldg. Courtroom, Criminal Justice Complex
113
+ 205 N. Dixie, West Palm Beach 38844 State Road 80, Belle Glade 3228 Gun Club Rd., West Palm Beach
114
+
115
+ IF YOU ARE A PERSON WITH A DISABILITY WHO NEEDS ANY ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS PROCEEDING, YOU ARE ENTITLED, AT NO COST TO YOU, TO THE PROVISION OF CERTAIN ASSISTANCE. PLEASE CONTACT ROBIN SHEPPETT, ADA COORDINATOR IN THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE COURT, PALM BEACH COUNTY COURTHOUSE, 205 N. DIXIE HWY, RM 5.2500, WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401; TELEPHONE (561) 355-4386, WITHIN 2 WORKING DAYS OF YOUR RECEIPT OF THIS NOTICE. IF YOU ARE HEARING OR VOICE IMPAIRED, CALL 1-800-955-8771.
116
+
117
+ CASE NO. 2006087931 HY
118
+
119
+ NAME: Te Broy Epstein
120
+
121
+ TERM OF Prob / Sex Off / Drug Off Prob / C.C. I C.C. II: 12 mos yrs as to Cts.
122
+
123
+ conc w/ consec. w/ \_\_\_\_\_
124
+
125
+ Probation transferred to:
126
+
127
+ SPECIAL CONDITIONS:
128
+
129
+ - Complete Originally Ordered Conditions
130
+ - Curfew: \_\_\_\_\_ p.m., with the following exception: \_\_\_\_\_
131
+ - Deft. to report to Prob. Dept. immediately upon release
132
+ - Deft. not to have in care, custody, or control any unlawful or illegal material, subst., device, or object.
133
+ - Deft. to immediately notify Prob. Officer if place of residence or job changes.
134
+ - Restitution CRO filed
135
+ - Subject to all ordinary and special conditions of Probation
136
+
137
+ Substance Abuse Eval. / Psychological Eval. / Psychosexual Eval. within / by: \_\_\_\_\_
138
+ and deft. to successfully complete recommended treatment
139
+
140
+ - Random Drug/Alcohol Testing At Deft's Expense Costs Waived
141
+ - No Consumption/Possession of Alcohol or Drugs or Intoxicants without a Prescription.
142
+ - Attend \_\_\_\_\_ AA and/or NA Meetings per Week.
143
+ - Deft. not to frequent any place of business whose primary purpose is the sale of alcohol.
144
+
145
+ Complete \_\_\_\_\_ Hrs. of Community Service to be done at the rate of \_\_\_\_\_ Hrs. per Wk / Mo.(Min.)
146
+
147
+ License Revoked / Suspended for \_\_\_\_\_ mos / yrs
148
+
149
+ Attend and successfully complete DUI school and 1 session of Victim Impact Panel
150
+ No Contact / No Violent Contact / No Direct or Indirect contact w/Victim(s) or others listed:
151
+
152
+ No Contact w/Minor Children w/o Adult Supervision aware of this case and the disposition.
153
+
154
+ Cost of Supervision: \$ \_\_\_\_\_ per month Waived by Court. \_\_\_\_\_
155
+
156
+ Enter and Successfully Complete DOC Non-Secure Bed Program and Any Recommended Aftercare.
157
+
158
+ Hold in Custody, release only to DOC Non-Secure Bed Program Officer.
159
+
160
+ Enter and Successfully Complete PBSO Long / Short Track Drug Farm and Any Rec. Aftercare.
161
+
162
+ Forfeit Weapon / Money seized at the time of arrest to:
163
+
164
+ Enter and Complete: Anger Management Program Batterers Intervention Program
165
+ Theft Abatement Program: \_\_\_\_\_ Other: \_\_\_\_\_
166
+
167
+ Defendant may apply for Early Termination after \_\_\_\_\_, provided all conds. are satisfied.
168
+
169
+ Serve \_\_\_\_\_ days / months in PBCJ, with credit for \_\_\_\_\_ days / months.
170
+
171
+ See all attached documents
172
+
173
+ Deft. must hold an ASA Secure Offender
174
+
175
+ w/+N 48 hours of Pre/Pose
176
+
177
+ \_\_\_\_\_
178
+
179
+ \_\_\_\_\_
180
+
181
+ \_\_\_\_\_
182
+
183
+ \_\_\_\_\_
marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739272/EFTA02739272.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,199 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739272.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 4,
15
+ "chars": 9070,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 16.11,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "EXHIBIT A",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 203.565,
27
+ 330.48
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 405.43341064453125,
31
+ 330.48
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 405.43341064453125,
35
+ 369.18365478515625
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 203.565,
39
+ 369.18365478515625
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "SPECIAL CONDITIONS:",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 3,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 39.975,
50
+ 133.65
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 169.12500000000003,
54
+ 133.65
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 169.12500000000003,
58
+ 149.85000000000002
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 39.975,
62
+ 149.85000000000002
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ }
66
+ ],
67
+ "page_stats": [
68
+ {
69
+ "page_id": 0,
70
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
71
+ "block_counts": [
72
+ [
73
+ "Span",
74
+ 5
75
+ ],
76
+ [
77
+ "Line",
78
+ 3
79
+ ],
80
+ [
81
+ "PageHeader",
82
+ 1
83
+ ],
84
+ [
85
+ "SectionHeader",
86
+ 1
87
+ ],
88
+ [
89
+ "PageFooter",
90
+ 1
91
+ ]
92
+ ],
93
+ "block_metadata": {
94
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
95
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
96
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
97
+ "previous_text": "",
98
+ "previous_type": "",
99
+ "previous_order": 0
100
+ }
101
+ },
102
+ {
103
+ "page_id": 1,
104
+ "text_extraction_method": "surya",
105
+ "block_counts": [
106
+ [
107
+ "Text",
108
+ 12
109
+ ],
110
+ [
111
+ "Form",
112
+ 3
113
+ ],
114
+ [
115
+ "PageFooter",
116
+ 3
117
+ ],
118
+ [
119
+ "PageHeader",
120
+ 2
121
+ ],
122
+ [
123
+ "ListGroup",
124
+ 1
125
+ ]
126
+ ],
127
+ "block_metadata": {
128
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
129
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
130
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
131
+ "previous_text": "",
132
+ "previous_type": "",
133
+ "previous_order": 0
134
+ }
135
+ },
136
+ {
137
+ "page_id": 2,
138
+ "text_extraction_method": "surya",
139
+ "block_counts": [
140
+ [
141
+ "Text",
142
+ 64
143
+ ],
144
+ [
145
+ "PageFooter",
146
+ 4
147
+ ],
148
+ [
149
+ "PageHeader",
150
+ 2
151
+ ]
152
+ ],
153
+ "block_metadata": {
154
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
155
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
156
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
157
+ "previous_text": "",
158
+ "previous_type": "",
159
+ "previous_order": 0
160
+ }
161
+ },
162
+ {
163
+ "page_id": 3,
164
+ "text_extraction_method": "surya",
165
+ "block_counts": [
166
+ [
167
+ "Text",
168
+ 37
169
+ ],
170
+ [
171
+ "PageFooter",
172
+ 4
173
+ ],
174
+ [
175
+ "PageHeader",
176
+ 3
177
+ ],
178
+ [
179
+ "ListGroup",
180
+ 3
181
+ ],
182
+ [
183
+ "SectionHeader",
184
+ 2
185
+ ]
186
+ ],
187
+ "block_metadata": {
188
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
189
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
190
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
191
+ "previous_text": "",
192
+ "previous_type": "",
193
+ "previous_order": 0
194
+ }
195
+ }
196
+ ],
197
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739272"
198
+ }
199
+ }
marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739276/EFTA02739276.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
2
+
3
+ CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA
4
+
5
+ JANE DOE NO. 3,
6
+
7
+ Plaintiff,
8
+
9
+ vs.
10
+
11
+ JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
12
+
13
+ Defendant.
14
+
15
+ ## DEFENDANT'S NOTICE CONCERNING MOTION TO STAY f DE 81
16
+
17
+ In connection with his motion to stay this action [DE 8], Defendant Jeffrey Epstein hereby notifies the Court that the State Court action, State of Florida v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 2006 CF 09454 AXX (Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County), was resolved on June 30, 2008. See Final Disposition sheets, attached hereto as Exhibit A. The federal criminal proceeding, however, remains pending.
18
+
19
+ Respectfully submitted,
20
+
21
+ ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER & WEISS, P.A.
22
+
23
+ 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Tel: 561 659 8300 Fax: 561 835 8691
24
+
25
+ By: /s/ Jack A. Goldberger
26
+
27
+ Jack A. Goldberger
28
+
29
+ Ha. Bar No. 262013
30
+
31
+ jgoldberger@ agwpa.com
32
+
33
+ Attorneys for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
34
+
35
+ ## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
36
+
37
+ I HEREBY CERTIFY that on July 1, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on counsel of record identified below by facsimile and U.S. Mail.
38
+
39
+ Jeffrey M. Herman, Esq. Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Herman & Mermelstein, P.A. 18205 Biscayne Blvd, Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160 Fax: 305 931 0877
40
+
41
+ > /s/ Jack A. Goldberger Jack A. Goldberger
marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739276/EFTA02739276.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,204 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739276.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 3,
15
+ "chars": 1424,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 0.81,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 184.82399999999998,
27
+ 87.48
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 417.3464050292969,
31
+ 87.48
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 417.3464050292969,
35
+ 120.88092041015625
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 184.82399999999998,
39
+ 120.88092041015625
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "DEFENDANT'S NOTICE CONCERNING MOTION TO STAY f DE 81",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 88.74,
50
+ 353.15999999999997
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 525.9515991210938,
54
+ 353.15999999999997
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 525.9515991210938,
58
+ 370.2509460449219
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 88.74,
62
+ 370.2509460449219
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ },
66
+ {
67
+ "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
68
+ "heading_level": null,
69
+ "page_id": 2,
70
+ "polygon": [
71
+ [
72
+ 212.97599999999997,
73
+ 72.77532958984375
74
+ ],
75
+ [
76
+ 405.20263671875,
77
+ 72.77532958984375
78
+ ],
79
+ [
80
+ 405.20263671875,
81
+ 88.62091064453125
82
+ ],
83
+ [
84
+ 212.97599999999997,
85
+ 88.62091064453125
86
+ ]
87
+ ]
88
+ }
89
+ ],
90
+ "page_stats": [
91
+ {
92
+ "page_id": 0,
93
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
94
+ "block_counts": [
95
+ [
96
+ "Span",
97
+ 47
98
+ ],
99
+ [
100
+ "Line",
101
+ 24
102
+ ],
103
+ [
104
+ "Text",
105
+ 11
106
+ ],
107
+ [
108
+ "SectionHeader",
109
+ 2
110
+ ],
111
+ [
112
+ "PageHeader",
113
+ 1
114
+ ],
115
+ [
116
+ "PageFooter",
117
+ 1
118
+ ]
119
+ ],
120
+ "block_metadata": {
121
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
122
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
123
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
124
+ "previous_text": "",
125
+ "previous_type": "",
126
+ "previous_order": 0
127
+ }
128
+ },
129
+ {
130
+ "page_id": 1,
131
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
132
+ "block_counts": [
133
+ [
134
+ "Span",
135
+ 16
136
+ ],
137
+ [
138
+ "Line",
139
+ 8
140
+ ],
141
+ [
142
+ "Text",
143
+ 5
144
+ ],
145
+ [
146
+ "PageFooter",
147
+ 2
148
+ ],
149
+ [
150
+ "PageHeader",
151
+ 1
152
+ ]
153
+ ],
154
+ "block_metadata": {
155
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
156
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
157
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
158
+ "previous_text": "",
159
+ "previous_type": "",
160
+ "previous_order": 0
161
+ }
162
+ },
163
+ {
164
+ "page_id": 2,
165
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
166
+ "block_counts": [
167
+ [
168
+ "Span",
169
+ 33
170
+ ],
171
+ [
172
+ "Line",
173
+ 17
174
+ ],
175
+ [
176
+ "Text",
177
+ 3
178
+ ],
179
+ [
180
+ "PageFooter",
181
+ 2
182
+ ],
183
+ [
184
+ "PageHeader",
185
+ 1
186
+ ],
187
+ [
188
+ "SectionHeader",
189
+ 1
190
+ ]
191
+ ],
192
+ "block_metadata": {
193
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
194
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
195
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
196
+ "previous_text": "",
197
+ "previous_type": "",
198
+ "previous_order": 0
199
+ }
200
+ }
201
+ ],
202
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739276"
203
+ }
204
+ }
marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739279/EFTA02739279.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
2
+
3
+ CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA-~
4
+
5
+ JANE DOE NO. 3,
6
+
7
+ Plaintiff,
8
+
9
+ vs.
10
+
11
+ JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
12
+
13
+ Defendant.
14
+
15
+ /
16
+
17
+ ## NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS CO-COUNSEL
18
+
19
+ NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the law firm of Tein, P.L. enters its appearance as co-counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein in these proceedings.
20
+
21
+ Respectfully submitted,
22
+
23
+ TEIN, P.L. 3059 Grand Avenue, Suite 340 Coconut Grove, Florida 33133 Tel: 305 442 1101 Fax: 305 442 6744
24
+
25
+ By: /s/ Michael R. Tein GUY A. Fla. Bar No. 623740 MICHAEL R. TEIN Ha. Bar No. 993522 tein@lewistein.com
26
+
27
+ ## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
28
+
29
+ I HEREBY CERTIFY that on July 8, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record identified on the following service list via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF.
30
+
31
+ > /s/ Michael R. Tein Michael R. Tein
32
+
33
+ ## SERVICE LIST
34
+
35
+ Jeffrey M. Herman, Esq. Stuart S. Mame!stein. Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Herman & Mennelstein, P.A. 18205 Biscayne Blvd, Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160 Fax: 305 931 0877
marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739279/EFTA02739279.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,231 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739279.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 3,
15
+ "chars": 1166,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 0.76,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 200.73600000000002,
27
+ 86.67
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 400.31707763671875,
31
+ 86.67
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 400.31707763671875,
35
+ 116.2330322265625
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 200.73600000000002,
39
+ 116.2330322265625
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS CO-COUNSEL",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 176.25599999999997,
50
+ 319.95000000000005
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 436.06396484375,
54
+ 319.95000000000005
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 436.06396484375,
58
+ 335.9830322265625
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 176.25599999999997,
62
+ 335.9830322265625
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ },
66
+ {
67
+ "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
68
+ "heading_level": null,
69
+ "page_id": 1,
70
+ "polygon": [
71
+ [
72
+ 222.768,
73
+ 70.47
74
+ ],
75
+ [
76
+ 388.5423889160156,
77
+ 70.47
78
+ ],
79
+ [
80
+ 388.5423889160156,
81
+ 86.2330322265625
82
+ ],
83
+ [
84
+ 222.768,
85
+ 86.2330322265625
86
+ ]
87
+ ]
88
+ },
89
+ {
90
+ "title": "SERVICE LIST",
91
+ "heading_level": null,
92
+ "page_id": 2,
93
+ "polygon": [
94
+ [
95
+ 260.712,
96
+ 69.66
97
+ ],
98
+ [
99
+ 351.1127014160156,
100
+ 69.66
101
+ ],
102
+ [
103
+ 351.1127014160156,
104
+ 85.447021484375
105
+ ],
106
+ [
107
+ 260.712,
108
+ 85.447021484375
109
+ ]
110
+ ]
111
+ }
112
+ ],
113
+ "page_stats": [
114
+ {
115
+ "page_id": 0,
116
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
117
+ "block_counts": [
118
+ [
119
+ "Span",
120
+ 51
121
+ ],
122
+ [
123
+ "Line",
124
+ 26
125
+ ],
126
+ [
127
+ "Text",
128
+ 11
129
+ ],
130
+ [
131
+ "SectionHeader",
132
+ 2
133
+ ],
134
+ [
135
+ "PageHeader",
136
+ 1
137
+ ],
138
+ [
139
+ "PageFooter",
140
+ 1
141
+ ]
142
+ ],
143
+ "block_metadata": {
144
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
145
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
146
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
147
+ "previous_text": "",
148
+ "previous_type": "",
149
+ "previous_order": 0
150
+ }
151
+ },
152
+ {
153
+ "page_id": 1,
154
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
155
+ "block_counts": [
156
+ [
157
+ "Span",
158
+ 17
159
+ ],
160
+ [
161
+ "Line",
162
+ 9
163
+ ],
164
+ [
165
+ "Text",
166
+ 2
167
+ ],
168
+ [
169
+ "PageHeader",
170
+ 1
171
+ ],
172
+ [
173
+ "SectionHeader",
174
+ 1
175
+ ],
176
+ [
177
+ "PageFooter",
178
+ 1
179
+ ]
180
+ ],
181
+ "block_metadata": {
182
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
183
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
184
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
185
+ "previous_text": "",
186
+ "previous_type": "",
187
+ "previous_order": 0
188
+ }
189
+ },
190
+ {
191
+ "page_id": 2,
192
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
193
+ "block_counts": [
194
+ [
195
+ "Span",
196
+ 19
197
+ ],
198
+ [
199
+ "Line",
200
+ 10
201
+ ],
202
+ [
203
+ "PageHeader",
204
+ 1
205
+ ],
206
+ [
207
+ "SectionHeader",
208
+ 1
209
+ ],
210
+ [
211
+ "Text",
212
+ 1
213
+ ],
214
+ [
215
+ "PageFooter",
216
+ 1
217
+ ]
218
+ ],
219
+ "block_metadata": {
220
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
221
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
222
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
223
+ "previous_text": "",
224
+ "previous_type": "",
225
+ "previous_order": 0
226
+ }
227
+ }
228
+ ],
229
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739279"
230
+ }
231
+ }
marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739282/EFTA02739282.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
2
+
3
+ CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRAi
4
+
5
+ JANE DOE NO. 3,
6
+
7
+ Plaintiff, vs.
8
+
9
+ JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
10
+
11
+ Defendant.
12
+
13
+ ## PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR STAY
14
+
15
+ ## JPROPOSED1 ORDER
16
+
17
+ Upon Plaintiff's Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Defendant's Motion for Stay, and good cause being shown it is hereby
18
+
19
+ ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion is granted. Plaintiff shall have an enlargement of time of twenty (20) days, until July 30, 2008, to respond to Defendant's Motion for Stay.
20
+
21
+ DONE AND ORDERED in in Ft. Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida, this day of 2008.
22
+
23
+ DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739282/EFTA02739282.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739282.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 1,
15
+ "chars": 674,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 0.69,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 206.24400000000003,
27
+ 85.85999999999999
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 405.95098876953125,
31
+ 85.85999999999999
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 405.95098876953125,
35
+ 115.4830322265625
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 206.24400000000003,
39
+ 115.4830322265625
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME \nTO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR STAY",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 148.10399999999998,
50
+ 295.65
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 464.7416076660156,
54
+ 295.65
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 464.7416076660156,
58
+ 325.10302734375
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 148.10399999999998,
62
+ 325.10302734375
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ },
66
+ {
67
+ "title": "JPROPOSED1 ORDER",
68
+ "heading_level": null,
69
+ "page_id": 0,
70
+ "polygon": [
71
+ [
72
+ 261.936,
73
+ 337.77
74
+ ],
75
+ [
76
+ 387.05316162109375,
77
+ 337.77
78
+ ],
79
+ [
80
+ 387.05316162109375,
81
+ 353.2330322265625
82
+ ],
83
+ [
84
+ 261.936,
85
+ 353.2330322265625
86
+ ]
87
+ ]
88
+ }
89
+ ],
90
+ "page_stats": [
91
+ {
92
+ "page_id": 0,
93
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
94
+ "block_counts": [
95
+ [
96
+ "Span",
97
+ 42
98
+ ],
99
+ [
100
+ "Line",
101
+ 21
102
+ ],
103
+ [
104
+ "Text",
105
+ 9
106
+ ],
107
+ [
108
+ "SectionHeader",
109
+ 3
110
+ ],
111
+ [
112
+ "PageFooter",
113
+ 2
114
+ ],
115
+ [
116
+ "PageHeader",
117
+ 1
118
+ ]
119
+ ],
120
+ "block_metadata": {
121
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
122
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
123
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
124
+ "previous_text": "",
125
+ "previous_type": "",
126
+ "previous_order": 0
127
+ }
128
+ }
129
+ ],
130
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739282"
131
+ }
132
+ }
marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739283/EFTA02739283.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
2
+
3
+ CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA
4
+
5
+ JANE DOE NO. 3,
6
+
7
+ Plaintiff, vs.
8
+
9
+ JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
10
+
11
+ Defendant.
12
+
13
+ ## PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR STAY
14
+
15
+ Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 3, by and through undersigned counsel, files this Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Defendant's Motion for Stay, and states as follows:
16
+
17
+ - 1. Defendant filed his Motion for Stay on June 20, 2008. Plaintiffs response is due on or before July 10, 2008.
18
+ - 2. Defendant's Motion for Stay is based upon the existence of purported parallel criminal actions, and is grounded in section 3509(k) of Title 18, United States Code.
19
+ - 3. Subsequent to filing his Motion for Stay on July 1, 2008, Defendant Epstein filed a Notice advising this Court that the State Court criminal action against the Defendant was resolved, but that the federal criminal proceeding remained pending. It is Plaintiff's counsel's understanding from press reports, however, that the federal criminal proceeding will be resolved in the same plea deal, which would make the Defendant's Motion for Stay moot.'
20
+ - 4. Therefore, Plaintiff respectfully requests a brief enlargement of time of twenty (20 days) within which to file a memorandum in opposition to Defendant's Motion for Stay. This
21
+
22
+ request for enlargement of time is in the interest of judicial economy and efficiency.
23
+
24
+ - 5. Additionally, Plaintiffs counsel requests this enlargement of time due to the demands on their time in other cases and matters.
25
+ - 6. Prior to filing this Motion, Plaintiffs counsel, Adam Horowitz, attempted to confer with defense counsel, to no avail.
26
+
27
+ WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully request that this Court enter an order enlarging by twenty (20) days the time within which the Plaintiff may respond to the Defendant's Motion for Stay, until July 30, 2008.
28
+
29
+ Dated: July 10, 2008. Respectfully submitted,
30
+
31
+ By: s/ Adam D. Horowitz Jeffrey M. Herman (FL Bar No. 521647) jherman@hermanlaw.com Stuart S. Mermelstein (FL Bar No. 947245) ssm@hermanlaw.com Adam D. Horowitz (FL Bar No. 376980) ahorowitz@ hermanlaw.com HERMAN & MERMELSTEIN, P.A. Attorneys for PlaintifsJane Doe 18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160 Tel: 305-931-2200 Fax: 305-931-0877
32
+
33
+ <sup>&#</sup>x27; Plaintiff opposes the Motion for Stay on its merits under 18 U.S.C. §3509(k).
34
+
35
+ ## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
36
+
37
+ I hereby certify that on July 10, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing document w. ith the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day to all parties on the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those parties who are not authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing.
38
+
39
+ Is/ Adam D. Horowitz
40
+
41
+ ## SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA/ffi United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
42
+
43
+ Jack Alan Goldberger jagesq@bcllsouth.nct
44
+
45
+ Michael R. Tein tein@lewistein.com
46
+
47
+ /s/ Adam D. Horowitz
marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739283/EFTA02739283.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739283.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 4,
15
+ "chars": 3143,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 0.76,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 206.24400000000003,
27
+ 85.85999999999999
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 405.95098876953125,
31
+ 85.85999999999999
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 405.95098876953125,
35
+ 115.4830322265625
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 206.24400000000003,
39
+ 115.4830322265625
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME \nTO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR STAY",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 148.10399999999998,
50
+ 295.65
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 464.7416076660156,
54
+ 295.65
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 464.7416076660156,
58
+ 325.10302734375
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 148.10399999999998,
62
+ 325.10302734375
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ },
66
+ {
67
+ "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
68
+ "heading_level": null,
69
+ "page_id": 2,
70
+ "polygon": [
71
+ [
72
+ 227.052,
73
+ 85.85999999999999
74
+ ],
75
+ [
76
+ 385.0019836425781,
77
+ 85.85999999999999
78
+ ],
79
+ [
80
+ 385.0019836425781,
81
+ 100.863037109375
82
+ ],
83
+ [
84
+ 227.052,
85
+ 100.863037109375
86
+ ]
87
+ ]
88
+ },
89
+ {
90
+ "title": "SERVICE LIST \nDOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN \nCASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA/ffi \nUnited States District Court, Southern District of Florida",
91
+ "heading_level": null,
92
+ "page_id": 3,
93
+ "polygon": [
94
+ [
95
+ 157.28400000000002,
96
+ 84.24
97
+ ],
98
+ [
99
+ 455.1346740722656,
100
+ 84.24
101
+ ],
102
+ [
103
+ 455.1346740722656,
104
+ 143.68353271484375
105
+ ],
106
+ [
107
+ 157.28400000000002,
108
+ 143.68353271484375
109
+ ]
110
+ ]
111
+ }
112
+ ],
113
+ "page_stats": [
114
+ {
115
+ "page_id": 0,
116
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
117
+ "block_counts": [
118
+ [
119
+ "Span",
120
+ 51
121
+ ],
122
+ [
123
+ "Line",
124
+ 26
125
+ ],
126
+ [
127
+ "Text",
128
+ 6
129
+ ],
130
+ [
131
+ "ListItem",
132
+ 4
133
+ ],
134
+ [
135
+ "SectionHeader",
136
+ 2
137
+ ],
138
+ [
139
+ "PageFooter",
140
+ 2
141
+ ],
142
+ [
143
+ "PageHeader",
144
+ 1
145
+ ],
146
+ [
147
+ "ListGroup",
148
+ 1
149
+ ]
150
+ ],
151
+ "block_metadata": {
152
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
153
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
154
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
155
+ "previous_text": "",
156
+ "previous_type": "",
157
+ "previous_order": 0
158
+ }
159
+ },
160
+ {
161
+ "page_id": 1,
162
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
163
+ "block_counts": [
164
+ [
165
+ "Span",
166
+ 51
167
+ ],
168
+ [
169
+ "Line",
170
+ 26
171
+ ],
172
+ [
173
+ "Text",
174
+ 5
175
+ ],
176
+ [
177
+ "PageFooter",
178
+ 2
179
+ ],
180
+ [
181
+ "ListItem",
182
+ 2
183
+ ],
184
+ [
185
+ "PageHeader",
186
+ 1
187
+ ],
188
+ [
189
+ "ListGroup",
190
+ 1
191
+ ],
192
+ [
193
+ "Footnote",
194
+ 1
195
+ ]
196
+ ],
197
+ "block_metadata": {
198
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
199
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
200
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
201
+ "previous_text": "",
202
+ "previous_type": "",
203
+ "previous_order": 0
204
+ }
205
+ },
206
+ {
207
+ "page_id": 2,
208
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
209
+ "block_counts": [
210
+ [
211
+ "Span",
212
+ 22
213
+ ],
214
+ [
215
+ "Line",
216
+ 10
217
+ ],
218
+ [
219
+ "Text",
220
+ 2
221
+ ],
222
+ [
223
+ "PageFooter",
224
+ 2
225
+ ],
226
+ [
227
+ "PageHeader",
228
+ 1
229
+ ],
230
+ [
231
+ "SectionHeader",
232
+ 1
233
+ ]
234
+ ],
235
+ "block_metadata": {
236
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
237
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
238
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
239
+ "previous_text": "",
240
+ "previous_type": "",
241
+ "previous_order": 0
242
+ }
243
+ },
244
+ {
245
+ "page_id": 3,
246
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
247
+ "block_counts": [
248
+ [
249
+ "Span",
250
+ 25
251
+ ],
252
+ [
253
+ "Line",
254
+ 12
255
+ ],
256
+ [
257
+ "Text",
258
+ 3
259
+ ],
260
+ [
261
+ "PageFooter",
262
+ 2
263
+ ],
264
+ [
265
+ "PageHeader",
266
+ 1
267
+ ],
268
+ [
269
+ "SectionHeader",
270
+ 1
271
+ ]
272
+ ],
273
+ "block_metadata": {
274
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
275
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
276
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
277
+ "previous_text": "",
278
+ "previous_type": "",
279
+ "previous_order": 0
280
+ }
281
+ }
282
+ ],
283
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739283"
284
+ }
285
+ }
marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739287/EFTA02739287.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ **U.S. District Court
2
+ Southern District of Florida (West Palm Beach)
3
+ CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 9:08-cv-80232-KAM
4
+ *Internal Use Only***
5
+
6
+ Doe No. 3 v. Epstein
7
+ Assigned to: Judge Kenneth A. Marra
8
+ Case: 9:08-cv-80119-KAM
9
+ Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
10
+
11
+ Date Filed: 03/05/2008
12
+ Jury Demand: Plaintiff
13
+ Nature of Suit: 360 P.I.: Other
14
+ Jurisdiction: Diversity
15
+
16
+ **Plaintiff**
17
+
18
+ **Jane Doe No. 3**
19
+
20
+ represented by **Adam D. Horowitz**
21
+ Herman & Mermelstein, P.A.
22
+ 18205 Biscayne Blvd.
23
+ Suite 2218
24
+ Miami, FL 33160
25
+ 305-931-2200
26
+ Fax: 305-931-0877
27
+ Email: ahorowitz@hermanlaw.com
28
+ *LEAD ATTORNEY*
29
+ *ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED*
30
+
31
+ **Jeffrey Marc Herman**
32
+ Herman & Mermelstein
33
+ 18205 Biscayne Boulevard
34
+ Suite 2218
35
+ Miami, FL 33160
36
+ 305-931-2200
37
+ Fax: 931-0877
38
+ Email: jherman@hermanlaw.com
39
+ *LEAD ATTORNEY*
40
+ *ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED*
41
+
42
+ **Stuart S. Mermelstein**
43
+ Herman & Mermelstein
44
+ 18205 Biscayne Boulevard
45
+ Suite 2218
46
+ Miami, FL 33160
47
+ 305-931-2200
48
+ Fax: 931-0877
49
+ Email: lrivera@hermanlaw.com
50
+ *LEAD ATTORNEY*
51
+ *ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED*
52
+
53
+ V.
54
+
55
+ **Defendant**
56
+
57
+ **Jeffrey Epstein**
58
+
59
+ represented by **Jack Alan Goldberger**
60
+ Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
61
+ 250 Australian Avenue South
62
+ Suite 1400
63
+ West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012
64
+ 561-659-8300
65
+ Fax: 835-8691
66
+ Email: jagesq@bellsouth.net
67
+ *ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED*
68
+
69
+ **Michael [REDACTED] Tein**
70
+ [REDACTED] Tein
71
+ 3059 Grand Avenue
72
+ Suite 340
73
+
74
+ Coconut Grove, FL 33133 305-442-1101 Fax: 442-6744 Email: tein@lewistein.com ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
75
+
76
+ | Date Filed | # | Docket Text |
77
+ |-------------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
78
+ | 03/05/2008 | 1 | COMPLAINT against Jeffrey Epstein. Filing fee \$350. Receipt No. 542467, |
79
+ | 03/05/2008 | 2 | Summons Issued as to Jeffrey Epstein. (caw) (Entered: 03/05/2008) |
80
+ | 03/11/2008 | 1 | ORDER requiring counsel to confer, file joint scheduling report and file joint |
81
+ | 05/22/2008 | 4 | AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Jeffrey Epstein |
82
+ | 05/29/2008 | 1 | Plaintiffs MOTION for Entry of Default by Clerk Against Defendant by Jane |
83
+ | 06/13/2008 | 6 | NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jack Alan Goldberger on behalf of Jeffrey |
84
+ | 06/13/2008 | 2 | RESPONSE to Motion rej Plaintiffs MOTION for Entry of Default by Clerk |
85
+ | | | Against Defendant Jane Doe No. 3 filed by Jeffrey Epstein. Replies due by |
86
+ | 06/20/2008 | A | Defendant's MOTION to Stay by Jeffrey Epstein. Responses due by 7/10/2008 |
87
+ | 06/20/2008 | 2 | Defendant's MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer Or Otherwise |
88
+ | | | Respond To Complaint by Jeffrey Epstein. (Goldberger. Jack) (Entered: |
89
+ | 06/24/2008 | JD | MEMORANDUM in Support rej. Plaintiffs MOTION for Entry of Default by |
90
+ | | | Clerk Against Defendant filed by Jane Doe No. 3. (Herman, Jeffrey) (Entered: |
91
+ | 07/01/2008 | 11, | NOTICE by Jeffrey Epstein Concerning Motion To Stay IDE 81 (Attachments: # |
92
+ | 07/08/2008 | 12 | NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Michael Tein on behalf of Jeffrey |
93
+ | 07/10/2008 | | 11 Plaintiffs MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as toja Defendant's |
94
+ | 07/10/2008 | 14 | Sealed Document. (yc) (Entered: 07/10/2008) |
95
+ | 07/10/2008 | 15 | Sealed Document. (yc) (Entered: 07/10/2008) |
96
+ | 07/16/2008 | 1St | ORDER denying motion to file Ex Parte and Under Seal. The clerk shall unseal |
97
+ | 07/ I6/2008 | | 11 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE why default should not be entered against |
marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739287/EFTA02739287.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,162 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739287.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 2,
15
+ "chars": 3824,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 5.83,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "U.S. District Court Southern District of Florida (West Palm Beach) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 9:08-cv-80232-KAM Internal Use Only",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 154.7,
27
+ 49.41
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 474.21500000000003,
31
+ 49.41
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 474.21500000000003,
35
+ 105.30000000000001
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 154.7,
39
+ 105.30000000000001
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "Plaintiff",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 70.21,
50
+ 175.76999999999998
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 113.05000000000001,
54
+ 175.76999999999998
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 113.05000000000001,
58
+ 187.92000000000002
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 70.21,
62
+ 187.92000000000002
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ },
66
+ {
67
+ "title": "Defendant",
68
+ "heading_level": null,
69
+ "page_id": 0,
70
+ "polygon": [
71
+ [
72
+ 70.21,
73
+ 583.2
74
+ ],
75
+ [
76
+ 123.16499999999998,
77
+ 583.2
78
+ ],
79
+ [
80
+ 123.16499999999998,
81
+ 595.3499999999999
82
+ ],
83
+ [
84
+ 70.21,
85
+ 595.3499999999999
86
+ ]
87
+ ]
88
+ }
89
+ ],
90
+ "page_stats": [
91
+ {
92
+ "page_id": 0,
93
+ "text_extraction_method": "surya",
94
+ "block_counts": [
95
+ [
96
+ "Text",
97
+ 20
98
+ ],
99
+ [
100
+ "SectionHeader",
101
+ 6
102
+ ],
103
+ [
104
+ "PageHeader",
105
+ 5
106
+ ],
107
+ [
108
+ "PageFooter",
109
+ 2
110
+ ]
111
+ ],
112
+ "block_metadata": {
113
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
114
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
115
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
116
+ "previous_text": "",
117
+ "previous_type": "",
118
+ "previous_order": 0
119
+ }
120
+ },
121
+ {
122
+ "page_id": 1,
123
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
124
+ "block_counts": [
125
+ [
126
+ "Span",
127
+ 115
128
+ ],
129
+ [
130
+ "Line",
131
+ 50
132
+ ],
133
+ [
134
+ "PageHeader",
135
+ 1
136
+ ],
137
+ [
138
+ "Text",
139
+ 1
140
+ ],
141
+ [
142
+ "Table",
143
+ 1
144
+ ],
145
+ [
146
+ "PageFooter",
147
+ 1
148
+ ]
149
+ ],
150
+ "block_metadata": {
151
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
152
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
153
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
154
+ "previous_text": "",
155
+ "previous_type": "",
156
+ "previous_order": 0
157
+ }
158
+ }
159
+ ],
160
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739287"
161
+ }
162
+ }
marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739289/EFTA02739289.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
2
+
3
+ NO. V-MARRA/
4
+
5
+ JANE DOE NO. 3,
6
+
7
+ Plaintiff,
8
+
9
+ v.
10
+
11
+ JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
12
+
13
+ Defendant.
14
+
15
+ ## ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SEAL
16
+
17
+ THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to File Ex Parte and Under Seal, filed July 10, 2008. Defendant seeks to file a Notice of Continued Pendency of Federal Criminal Action under seal.' The Court has carefully considered the motion and the record and is otherwise fully advised in the premises.
18
+
19
+ As stated in the Local Rules for the Southern District of Florida, "proceedings in the United States District Court are public and Court filings are matters of public record." S.D. Fla. L.R. 5.4(A). It is well settled that the media and the public in general possess a common-law right to inspect and copy judicial records. See Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 (1978). "The right to inspect and copy records is not absolute, however. As with other forms of access, it may interfere with the administration of justice and hence may have to be curtailed." v. Graddick, 696 F.2d 796, 803 (11th Cir.1983). This right of access creates
20
+
21
+ <sup>&#</sup>x27;All documents filed conventionally shall henceforth be filed directly with the Office of the Clerk in West Palm Beach, Florida. The parties shall not file documents conventionally in any other division of the Southern District of Florida.
22
+
23
+ a presumption in favor of openness of court records, which "must be balanced against any competing interest advanced." United States v. Noriega, 752 F. Supp. 1037, 1040 (S.D. Fla.1990). For example, courts may look to see whether the records sought are for illegitimate purposes. 696 F.2d at 803. Likewise, the Court may consider whether "the press has already been permitted substantial access to the contents of the records." Id.
24
+
25
+ In his motion to seal, Defendant has made no argument as to why his Notice of Continued Pendency of Federal Criminal Action should not be made available to the public. Defendant states only that he wishes ItIo avoid disclosure of confidential material." (Def. Mot. 2.) The Court finds this justification insufficient to justify keeping this document (filed ex parte) under seal. The Court is supported in this conclusion by its decision in a similar case, In re: Jane Doe, No. 08-80736-C1V (S.D. Fla. July I1, 2008), in which the Court unsealed, over the objection of the United States Attorney, documents containing similar information regarding Defendant's criminal plea agreement. Thus, any argument regarding confidentiality is vitiated by the fact that information regarding Defendant's criminal plea arrangement is already a matter of public record. See, e.g., Sally Apgar, Victims Object to Palm Beach Billionaire's Plea Deal in Underage Sex Case, S. Fla. Sun-Sentinel, July 12, 2008. Similarly, Defendant has not justified the necessity of filing his Notice ex parte. As such, Defendant's Motion to Seal shall be denied.
26
+
27
+ Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendant's Motion to File Ex Pare and Under Seal is DENIED. The Clerk shall UNSEAL docket entries 14 and 15 and make them available for public inspection through CM/ECF at the earliest possible time. Defendant is further ORDERED to serve a copy of his Notice on Plaintiff within five (5) days of the date of
28
+
29
+ entry of this Order.
30
+
31
+ DONE AND ORDERED in at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County,
32
+
33
+ Florida, this 16ih day of July, 2008.
34
+
35
+ Copies furnished to: all counsel of record KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge
marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739289/EFTA02739289.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,181 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739289.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 3,
15
+ "chars": 3542,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 0.87,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 206.856,
27
+ 71.28
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 405.5581359863281,
31
+ 71.28
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 405.5581359863281,
35
+ 100.4830322265625
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 206.856,
39
+ 100.4830322265625
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SEAL",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 197.06400000000002,
50
+ 298.08
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 415.5150451660156,
54
+ 298.08
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 415.5150451660156,
58
+ 313.18353271484375
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 197.06400000000002,
62
+ 313.18353271484375
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ }
66
+ ],
67
+ "page_stats": [
68
+ {
69
+ "page_id": 0,
70
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
71
+ "block_counts": [
72
+ [
73
+ "Span",
74
+ 57
75
+ ],
76
+ [
77
+ "Line",
78
+ 26
79
+ ],
80
+ [
81
+ "Text",
82
+ 8
83
+ ],
84
+ [
85
+ "SectionHeader",
86
+ 2
87
+ ],
88
+ [
89
+ "PageFooter",
90
+ 2
91
+ ],
92
+ [
93
+ "PageHeader",
94
+ 1
95
+ ],
96
+ [
97
+ "Footnote",
98
+ 1
99
+ ]
100
+ ],
101
+ "block_metadata": {
102
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
103
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
104
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
105
+ "previous_text": "",
106
+ "previous_type": "",
107
+ "previous_order": 0
108
+ }
109
+ },
110
+ {
111
+ "page_id": 1,
112
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
113
+ "block_counts": [
114
+ [
115
+ "Span",
116
+ 60
117
+ ],
118
+ [
119
+ "Line",
120
+ 24
121
+ ],
122
+ [
123
+ "Text",
124
+ 3
125
+ ],
126
+ [
127
+ "PageFooter",
128
+ 2
129
+ ],
130
+ [
131
+ "PageHeader",
132
+ 1
133
+ ]
134
+ ],
135
+ "block_metadata": {
136
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
137
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
138
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
139
+ "previous_text": "",
140
+ "previous_type": "",
141
+ "previous_order": 0
142
+ }
143
+ },
144
+ {
145
+ "page_id": 2,
146
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
147
+ "block_counts": [
148
+ [
149
+ "Span",
150
+ 23
151
+ ],
152
+ [
153
+ "Line",
154
+ 11
155
+ ],
156
+ [
157
+ "Text",
158
+ 5
159
+ ],
160
+ [
161
+ "PageFooter",
162
+ 2
163
+ ],
164
+ [
165
+ "PageHeader",
166
+ 1
167
+ ]
168
+ ],
169
+ "block_metadata": {
170
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
171
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
172
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
173
+ "previous_text": "",
174
+ "previous_type": "",
175
+ "previous_order": 0
176
+ }
177
+ }
178
+ ],
179
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739289"
180
+ }
181
+ }
marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739292/EFTA02739292.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
2
+
3
+ NO. 08-80232-CIV-MARRa
4
+
5
+ JANE DOE NO. 3,
6
+
7
+ Plaintiff,
8
+
9
+ v.
10
+
11
+ JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
12
+
13
+ Defendant.
14
+
15
+ ### ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DEFAULT SHOULD NOT BE ENTERED AGAINST DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN
16
+
17
+ THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on Plaintiff S Motion for Entry of Default by Clerk (DE 5), filed May 29, 2008. The motion is now fully briefed and is ripe for review. The Court has carefully considered the motion and is otherwise fully advised in the premises.
18
+
19
+ # Background
20
+
21
+ On March 5, 2008, Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 3 ("Plaintiff') filed the instant action against Jeffrey Epstein ("Defendant"), alleging claims of sexual assault and intentional infliction of emotional distress. (DE 1.) Plaintiffs process server attempted to deliver a copy of the summons and complaint to Defendant personally on April 23, April 24, and May I, 2008, at his residence in New York City. (DE 4.) None of these attempts were successful. On May 7, 2008, the process server left a copy of the summons and complaint with "'John =' Assistant & House Staff Employee who refused true name." (DE 4.) The process server also mailed a copy of the summons and complaint to Defendant on May 5, 2008, via first class mail. (DE 4.) The
22
+
23
+ envelope was marked "personal and confidential" and did not indicate that the envelope was from an attorney or related to a legal action. (DE 4.)
24
+
25
+ # Discussion
26
+
27
+ Rule 4(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure states that an individual may be served by "following state law for serving a summons in an action brought in courts of general jurisdiction in the state where the district court is located or where service is made." Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(e)(I). Alternatively, service may be made by leaving a copy of the summons and complaint at the individual's place of abode "with someone of suitable age and discretion who resides there." Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(e)(2)(B).
28
+
29
+ Plaintiff claims that service in this case is valid pursuant to either Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(eX2XB) or Florida law. Like the Federal Rules, Florida law requires that process be left at the individual's usual place of abode "with any person residing therein who is 15 years of age or older." Fla. Stat. § 48.031(1)(a). The affidavit of service (DE 4) states that the summons and complaint were left with "John at Defendant's usual place of abode. From this declaration, the Court cannot determine whether "John resides at the Manhattan apartment. Further, Defendant has submitted the affidavit of Richard Barnett, who avers that he received copies of the summons and complaint on May 7, 2008, from the process server. (DE 9 Ex. A.) Because Plaintiff has provided no indication to suggest that "John M' resides at the apartment, the Court concludes that Plaintiff did not effect valid service on Defendant under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(eX2XB) or Fla. Stat. § 48.031(1)(a).
30
+
31
+ The Court does not believe that Plaintiff's request for discovery on the issue of service is necessary, because service of process was made pursuant to New York law. Under New York
32
+
33
+ law, personal service may be made on an individual by
34
+
35
+ delivering the summons within the state to a person of suitable age and discretion at the actual place of business, dwelling place or usual place of abode of the person to be served and by either mailing the summons to the person to be served at his or her last known residence or by mailing the summons by first class mail to the person to be served at his or her actual place of business in an envelope bearing the legend "personal and confidential" and not indicating on the outside thereof, by return address or otherwise, that the communication is from an attorney or concerns an action against the person to be served, such delivery and mailing to be effected within twenty days of each other.
36
+
37
+ N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 308(2) (McKinney 2008) (emphasis added). New York law does not require the person receiving the summons and complaint at the individual's place of abode to reside at that location. See, e.g., Boston Safe Deposit and Tryst Co. v. Morse, 779 F. Supp. 347, 350 (S.D.N.Y. 1991); Al Fayed v. Barak, 833 N.Y.S. 2d 500, 501 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007).
38
+
39
+ In this case, the affidavit of service states that "John was a person of suitable age and discretion who accepted a copy of the summons and complaint at Defendant's actual apartment. (DE 4.) Thus, under New York law, delivery of the summons and complaint to "John was appropriate. Because the summons and complaint were mailed to Defendant and delivered to his residence within twenty days of each other, Plaintiff took all necessary steps to serve Defendant under New York law.
40
+
41
+ As Defendant recognizes, New York law also requires that proof of service be "filed with the clerk of the court designated in the summons within twenty days of either such delivery or mailing, whichever is effected later." N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 308(2). Here, Plaintiff is in compliance with this requirement as well: delivery was made on May 7, 2008, and proof of service was filed with the Clerk of the Court on May 22, 2008. (DE 4.) Thus, service was deemed complete as of June 2, 2008, under New York law. See N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 308(2) (stating "service shall be complete ten days after" filing of proof of service).
42
+
43
+ Nevertheless, Defendant's analysis is not entirely correct. In calculating when Defendant's response was due, the Court turns to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a), which states that a defendant must serve an answer within twenty days of being served with the summons and complaint. Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(aX I XAXi). Under this rule, Defendant was required to respond to the Complaint within twenty days from the receipt of the summons; the rule does not suggest a longer period of time is available when substituted service is used to serve a defendant. While Rule 4(e)(1) allows Plaintiff to serve process on Defendant in the method permitted by New York, Rule 4(e)(I) does not alter the twenty day period specified by Rule 12(a). In other words, under Rules 4(e)(1) and 12(a), the Court is not bound by New York's proof of service filing requirement nor New York's "completion" date in determining when Defendant's answer needed to be filed. Beller & v. Tyler, 120 F.3d 21, 25-26 (2d Cir. 1997) (reconciling the deadlines imposed by Rule 12(a) and N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 308). Instead, once Defendant received a copy of the summons and complaint, Defendant had twenty days to respond. Id. ("[A] defendant has twenty days from the receipt of the summons to file an answer .... This is so even if ... the defendant is served pursuant to a state law method of service and the state law provides a longer time in which to answer."). Thus, Defendant's response was due on May 27, 2007.1
44
+
45
+ <sup>&#</sup>x27;In Tyler, the court acknowledged that, because service was made in part by mail, the defendant may have the benefit of three extra days to respond per Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(e). Tyler, 120 F.3d at 26. In this case, Plaintiff's server mailed the summons and complaint on May 5, 2008. Thus, under this scheme, Defendant would have had until May 28, 2008, to respond. Either way, Defendant failed to appear int his case until June 13, 2008.
46
+
47
+ ### Conclusion
48
+
49
+ Accordingly, Defendant is hereby ORDERED to file a report with the Court showing good cause why default should not be entered for failure to respond to the Complaint in a timely manner within ten (10) days from the date of entry of this Order. Plaintiff may respond to Defendant's report within the time allotted by the Local Rules. Failure to respond to this Order shall result in an entry of default against Defendant.
50
+
51
+ DONE AND ORDERED in at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 16"' day of July, 2008.
52
+
53
+ > KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge
54
+
55
+ Copies furnished to: all counsel of record
marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739292/EFTA02739292.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,326 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739292.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 5,
15
+ "chars": 7806,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 1.19,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 206.856,
27
+ 71.28
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 405.5581359863281,
31
+ 71.28
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 405.5581359863281,
35
+ 100.4830322265625
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 206.856,
39
+ 100.4830322265625
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DEFAULT SHOULD NOT BE ENTERED \nAGAINST DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 101.59200000000001,
50
+ 298.08
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 511.34710693359375,
54
+ 298.08
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 511.34710693359375,
58
+ 327.363037109375
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 101.59200000000001,
62
+ 327.363037109375
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ },
66
+ {
67
+ "title": "Background",
68
+ "heading_level": null,
69
+ "page_id": 0,
70
+ "polygon": [
71
+ [
72
+ 69.156,
73
+ 425.25
74
+ ],
75
+ [
76
+ 138.34512329101562,
77
+ 425.25
78
+ ],
79
+ [
80
+ 138.34512329101562,
81
+ 440.60302734375
82
+ ],
83
+ [
84
+ 69.156,
85
+ 440.60302734375
86
+ ]
87
+ ]
88
+ },
89
+ {
90
+ "title": "Discussion",
91
+ "heading_level": null,
92
+ "page_id": 1,
93
+ "polygon": [
94
+ [
95
+ 69.156,
96
+ 127.98000000000002
97
+ ],
98
+ [
99
+ 128.8201904296875,
100
+ 127.98000000000002
101
+ ],
102
+ [
103
+ 128.8201904296875,
104
+ 143.2330322265625
105
+ ],
106
+ [
107
+ 69.156,
108
+ 143.2330322265625
109
+ ]
110
+ ]
111
+ },
112
+ {
113
+ "title": "Conclusion",
114
+ "heading_level": null,
115
+ "page_id": 4,
116
+ "polygon": [
117
+ [
118
+ 68.544,
119
+ 72.08999999999999
120
+ ],
121
+ [
122
+ 131.8949737548828,
123
+ 72.08999999999999
124
+ ],
125
+ [
126
+ 131.8949737548828,
127
+ 86.60302734375
128
+ ],
129
+ [
130
+ 68.544,
131
+ 86.60302734375
132
+ ]
133
+ ]
134
+ }
135
+ ],
136
+ "page_stats": [
137
+ {
138
+ "page_id": 0,
139
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
140
+ "block_counts": [
141
+ [
142
+ "Span",
143
+ 49
144
+ ],
145
+ [
146
+ "Line",
147
+ 25
148
+ ],
149
+ [
150
+ "Text",
151
+ 8
152
+ ],
153
+ [
154
+ "SectionHeader",
155
+ 3
156
+ ],
157
+ [
158
+ "PageFooter",
159
+ 2
160
+ ],
161
+ [
162
+ "PageHeader",
163
+ 1
164
+ ]
165
+ ],
166
+ "block_metadata": {
167
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
168
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
169
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
170
+ "previous_text": "",
171
+ "previous_type": "",
172
+ "previous_order": 0
173
+ }
174
+ },
175
+ {
176
+ "page_id": 1,
177
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
178
+ "block_counts": [
179
+ [
180
+ "Span",
181
+ 49
182
+ ],
183
+ [
184
+ "Line",
185
+ 25
186
+ ],
187
+ [
188
+ "Text",
189
+ 4
190
+ ],
191
+ [
192
+ "PageFooter",
193
+ 2
194
+ ],
195
+ [
196
+ "PageHeader",
197
+ 1
198
+ ],
199
+ [
200
+ "SectionHeader",
201
+ 1
202
+ ]
203
+ ],
204
+ "block_metadata": {
205
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
206
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
207
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
208
+ "previous_text": "",
209
+ "previous_type": "",
210
+ "previous_order": 0
211
+ }
212
+ },
213
+ {
214
+ "page_id": 2,
215
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
216
+ "block_counts": [
217
+ [
218
+ "Span",
219
+ 67
220
+ ],
221
+ [
222
+ "Line",
223
+ 29
224
+ ],
225
+ [
226
+ "Text",
227
+ 5
228
+ ],
229
+ [
230
+ "PageFooter",
231
+ 2
232
+ ],
233
+ [
234
+ "PageHeader",
235
+ 1
236
+ ]
237
+ ],
238
+ "block_metadata": {
239
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
240
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
241
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
242
+ "previous_text": "",
243
+ "previous_type": "",
244
+ "previous_order": 0
245
+ }
246
+ },
247
+ {
248
+ "page_id": 3,
249
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
250
+ "block_counts": [
251
+ [
252
+ "Span",
253
+ 51
254
+ ],
255
+ [
256
+ "Line",
257
+ 26
258
+ ],
259
+ [
260
+ "Text",
261
+ 2
262
+ ],
263
+ [
264
+ "PageFooter",
265
+ 2
266
+ ],
267
+ [
268
+ "PageHeader",
269
+ 1
270
+ ],
271
+ [
272
+ "Footnote",
273
+ 1
274
+ ]
275
+ ],
276
+ "block_metadata": {
277
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
278
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
279
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
280
+ "previous_text": "",
281
+ "previous_type": "",
282
+ "previous_order": 0
283
+ }
284
+ },
285
+ {
286
+ "page_id": 4,
287
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
288
+ "block_counts": [
289
+ [
290
+ "Span",
291
+ 31
292
+ ],
293
+ [
294
+ "Line",
295
+ 15
296
+ ],
297
+ [
298
+ "Text",
299
+ 4
300
+ ],
301
+ [
302
+ "PageFooter",
303
+ 2
304
+ ],
305
+ [
306
+ "PageHeader",
307
+ 1
308
+ ],
309
+ [
310
+ "SectionHeader",
311
+ 1
312
+ ]
313
+ ],
314
+ "block_metadata": {
315
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
316
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
317
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
318
+ "previous_text": "",
319
+ "previous_type": "",
320
+ "previous_order": 0
321
+ }
322
+ }
323
+ ],
324
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739292"
325
+ }
326
+ }
marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739297/EFTA02739297.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
+ SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
3
+
4
+ CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA-
5
+
6
+ ![](_page_0_Picture_67.jpeg)
7
+
8
+ JANE DOE NO. 3,
9
+
10
+ Plaintiff,
11
+
12
+ vs.
13
+
14
+ JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
15
+
16
+ Defendant.
17
+
18
+ \_\_\_\_\_/
19
+
20
+ FILED BY
21
+ 08 JUL 0 PM 12: 23
22
+ STEVEN H. LARINDRE
23
+ S. D. OFF. FLA. Z. HIA
24
+
25
+ **FILED EX PARTE
26
+ UNDER SEAL**
27
+
28
+ **DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO FILE EX PARTE AND UNDER SEAL**
29
+
30
+ ![]()Pursuant to S.D. Fla. L.R. 5.4, defendant Jeffrey Epstein hereby moves to file his Notice of Continued Pendency of Federal Criminal Action, as well as this motion, ex parte and under seal, stating as follows:
31
+
32
+ - 1. In support of his motion to stay [DE 8], defendant has herewith filed a Notice of Continued Pendency of Federal Criminal Action.
33
+ - 2. The Notice relates to a confidential agreement between the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida and the defendant.
34
+ - 3. The information contained in the Notice is material to this Court's consideration of Epstein's motion to stay.
35
+ - 4. To avoid disclosure of confidential material, Epstein requests leave to file the Notice, and this motion, ex parte and under seal.
36
+ - 5. Pending a ruling from this Court, Epstein has not served this motion or the Notice on counsel for plaintiff.
37
+
38
+ WHEREFORE, defendant Jeffrey Epstein respectfully requests leave to file this motion and his Notice of Continued Pendency of Federal Criminal Action, ex parte and under seal.
39
+
40
+ Respectfully submitted,
41
+
42
+ TEIN, P.L. 3059 Grand Avenue, Suite 340 Coconut Grove, Florida 33133 Tel: 305 442 1101 Fax: 305 442 6744
43
+
44
+ By: GUY A. Fla. Bar No. 623740 MICHAEL R. TEIN Fla. Bar No. 993522 tein@lewistein.com
45
+
46
+ ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER & WEISS, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Tel. 561 659 8300 Fax. 561 835 8691
47
+
48
+ By: JACK A. GOLDBERGER Fla. Bar No. 262013 jgoldberger@agwpa.com
49
+
50
+ Attorneys for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
51
+
52
+ **CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE**
53
+
54
+ I HEREBY CERTIFY that this motion, in accordance with S.D. Fla. L.R. 5.4, has not been served on opposing counsel and was filed under seal on July 10, 2008.
55
+
56
+ ![]()\_\_\_\_\_
57
+ Michael R. Tein
marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739297/EFTA02739297.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,233 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739297.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 4,
15
+ "chars": 2096,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 3.5,
17
+ "image_assets": [
18
+ "_page_0_Picture_67.jpeg"
19
+ ],
20
+ "marker_metadata": {
21
+ "table_of_contents": [
22
+ {
23
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
24
+ "heading_level": null,
25
+ "page_id": 0,
26
+ "polygon": [
27
+ [
28
+ 180.195,
29
+ 67.23
30
+ ],
31
+ [
32
+ 412.04999999999995,
33
+ 67.23
34
+ ],
35
+ [
36
+ 412.04999999999995,
37
+ 98.82
38
+ ],
39
+ [
40
+ 180.195,
41
+ 98.82
42
+ ]
43
+ ]
44
+ },
45
+ {
46
+ "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
47
+ "heading_level": null,
48
+ "page_id": 3,
49
+ "polygon": [
50
+ [
51
+ 197.41500000000002,
52
+ 69.66
53
+ ],
54
+ [
55
+ 402.21,
56
+ 69.66
57
+ ],
58
+ [
59
+ 402.21,
60
+ 86.67
61
+ ],
62
+ [
63
+ 197.41500000000002,
64
+ 86.67
65
+ ]
66
+ ]
67
+ }
68
+ ],
69
+ "page_stats": [
70
+ {
71
+ "page_id": 0,
72
+ "text_extraction_method": "surya",
73
+ "block_counts": [
74
+ [
75
+ "Span",
76
+ 33
77
+ ],
78
+ [
79
+ "Text",
80
+ 22
81
+ ],
82
+ [
83
+ "Line",
84
+ 16
85
+ ],
86
+ [
87
+ "PageHeader",
88
+ 2
89
+ ],
90
+ [
91
+ "SectionHeader",
92
+ 2
93
+ ],
94
+ [
95
+ "Picture",
96
+ 2
97
+ ],
98
+ [
99
+ "PageFooter",
100
+ 2
101
+ ]
102
+ ],
103
+ "block_metadata": {
104
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
105
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
106
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
107
+ "previous_text": "",
108
+ "previous_type": "",
109
+ "previous_order": 0
110
+ }
111
+ },
112
+ {
113
+ "page_id": 1,
114
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
115
+ "block_counts": [
116
+ [
117
+ "Span",
118
+ 31
119
+ ],
120
+ [
121
+ "Line",
122
+ 16
123
+ ],
124
+ [
125
+ "ListItem",
126
+ 5
127
+ ],
128
+ [
129
+ "PageFooter",
130
+ 2
131
+ ],
132
+ [
133
+ "PageHeader",
134
+ 1
135
+ ],
136
+ [
137
+ "Text",
138
+ 1
139
+ ],
140
+ [
141
+ "ListGroup",
142
+ 1
143
+ ]
144
+ ],
145
+ "block_metadata": {
146
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
147
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
148
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
149
+ "previous_text": "",
150
+ "previous_type": "",
151
+ "previous_order": 0
152
+ }
153
+ },
154
+ {
155
+ "page_id": 2,
156
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
157
+ "block_counts": [
158
+ [
159
+ "Span",
160
+ 49
161
+ ],
162
+ [
163
+ "Line",
164
+ 25
165
+ ],
166
+ [
167
+ "Text",
168
+ 7
169
+ ],
170
+ [
171
+ "PageFooter",
172
+ 2
173
+ ],
174
+ [
175
+ "PageHeader",
176
+ 1
177
+ ]
178
+ ],
179
+ "block_metadata": {
180
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
181
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
182
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
183
+ "previous_text": "",
184
+ "previous_type": "",
185
+ "previous_order": 0
186
+ }
187
+ },
188
+ {
189
+ "page_id": 3,
190
+ "text_extraction_method": "surya",
191
+ "block_counts": [
192
+ [
193
+ "Span",
194
+ 21
195
+ ],
196
+ [
197
+ "Line",
198
+ 8
199
+ ],
200
+ [
201
+ "Text",
202
+ 4
203
+ ],
204
+ [
205
+ "PageFooter",
206
+ 4
207
+ ],
208
+ [
209
+ "PageHeader",
210
+ 2
211
+ ],
212
+ [
213
+ "SectionHeader",
214
+ 2
215
+ ],
216
+ [
217
+ "Caption",
218
+ 2
219
+ ]
220
+ ],
221
+ "block_metadata": {
222
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
223
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
224
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
225
+ "previous_text": "",
226
+ "previous_type": "",
227
+ "previous_order": 0
228
+ }
229
+ }
230
+ ],
231
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739297"
232
+ }
233
+ }
marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739297/_page_0_Picture_67.jpeg ADDED

Git LFS Details

  • SHA256: 7fb908cddbc1606fd70c117abdb7750762bbe08796b068bd82721b840dd630f5
  • Pointer size: 129 Bytes
  • Size of remote file: 1.19 kB
marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739301/EFTA02739301.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
+ SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
3
+
4
+ CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA-
5
+
6
+ ![](_page_0_Picture_50.jpeg)
7
+
8
+ JANE DOE NO. 3,
9
+
10
+ Plaintiff,
11
+
12
+ vs.
13
+
14
+ JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
15
+
16
+ Defendant.
17
+
18
+ \_\_\_\_\_/
19
+
20
+ ![](_page_0_Picture_57.jpeg)
21
+
22
+ **FILED EX PARTE
23
+ UNDER SEAL**
24
+
25
+ *150*
26
+
27
+ ## NOTICE OF CONTINUED PENDENCY OF FEDERAL CRIMINAL ACTION
28
+
29
+ Defendant Jeffrey Epstein hereby notifies the Court of the continued pendency of a federal criminal action against him, stating as follows:
30
+
31
+ On June 30, 2008, after defendant Jeffrey Epstein filed his motion to stay [DE 8], he was sentenced in the state-court criminal case described in that motion (State of Florida v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 2006 CF 09454 AXX, Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County) (the "Florida Criminal Action"). As explained below, the parallel federal criminal action against him described in that motion (In re Grand Juty, No. FGJ 07-103(WPB), United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida) (the "Federal Criminal Action"), remains pending.
32
+
33
+ On September 24, 2007, the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("USAO"), represented by Assistant United States Attorney Ann C. Villafana, Esq., and Mr. Epstein, entered into a deferredprosecution agreement ("Agreement"), which the parties agreed to keep confidential. Prior to entering into that Agreement, Ms. Villafana advised that she had already prepared a federal criminal indictment against Mr. Epstein in the Federal Criminal Action.
34
+
35
+ Under the Agreement, beginning on the date Mr. Epstein began serving his sentence in the Florida Criminal Action, the USAO agreed to suspend its grand jury investigation in the Federal Criminal Action. The USAO, however, retains the
36
+
37
+ right to reactivate the grand jury and indict Mr. Epstein should he breach any part of the Agreement during its term, which runs for 33 months, beginning on the date Mr. Epstein began serving his sentence in the Florida Criminal Action. Accordingly, the Federal Criminal Action will remain pending against Mr. Epstein for 33 months from June 30, 2008.
38
+
39
+ Mr. Epstein will provide the Court with a copy of the confidential Agreement for its in-camera inspection at the Court's request.
40
+
41
+ WHEREFORE, Defendant Jeffrey Epstein hereby notifies the Court of the continued pendency of the Federal Criminal Action.
42
+
43
+ Respectfully submitted,
44
+
45
+ TEIN, P.L. 3059 Grand Avenue, Suite 340 Coconut Grove, Florida 33133 Tel: 305 442 1101 Fax: 305 442 6744
46
+
47
+ By:
48
+
49
+ GUY A. Fla. Bar No. 623740
50
+
51
+ MICHAEL R. TEIN Fla. Bar No. 993522 tein@lewistein.com
52
+
53
+ ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER & WEISS, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Tel. 561 659 8300 Fax. 561 835 8691
54
+
55
+ By: Jack A. Goldberger Fla. Bar No. 262013 jgoldberger@agwpa.com
56
+
57
+ Attorneys for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
58
+
59
+ ## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
60
+
61
+ I HEREBY CERTIFY that this motion, in accordance with S.D. Fla. L.R. 5.4, has not been served on opposing counsel and was filed under seal on July 10, 2008.
62
+
63
+ ituzitea;
64
+
65
+ Michael R. Tein