diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739227/EFTA02739227.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739227/EFTA02739227.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4f603e2230abfd14a6b6f88cb8fd8645c608f205
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739227/EFTA02739227.md
@@ -0,0 +1,169 @@
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.:
+
+08-CV-80232-Marra-
+
+STEVEN N. LARIMORE CLERK U.5. DIST. CT. S.O. Of FLA. • MIAMI
+
+### COMPLAINT
+
+Plaintiff, Jane Doe No.3 ("Jane" or "Jane Doe"), brings this Complaint against Jeffrey Epstein, as follows:
+
+## Parties, Jurisdiction and Venue
+
+- 1. Jane Doe is acitizen and resident of the State of Florida, and is sui juris.
+- 2. This Complaint is brought under afictitious name to protect the identity of the Plaintiff because this Complaint makes sensitive allegations of sexual assault and abuse upon her when she was <sup>a</sup>minor.
+  - 3. Defendant Jeffrey Epstein is acitizen and resident of the State of New York.
+  - 4. This is an action for damages in excess of \$50 million.
+- 5. This Court has jurisdiction of this action and the claims set forth herein pursuant to <sup>28</sup> U.S.C. §1332(a), as the matter in controversy (i) exceeds \$75,000, exclusive of interest and costs; and (ii) is between citizens of different states.
+- 6. This Court has venue of this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1391(a) as <sup>a</sup>substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred in this District.
+
+# Factual Allegations
+
+7. At all relevant times, Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") was an adult male, <sup>52</sup> years old. Epstein is a financier and money manager with a secret clientele limited exclusively to billionaires. He is himself a man of tremendous wealth, power and influence. He maintains his principal home in New York and also owns residences in New Mexico, St... and Palm Beach, FL. The allegations herein concern Epstein's conduct while at his lavish estate in Palm Beach.
+
+8. Upon information and belief, Epstein has a sexual preference and obsession for underage minor girls. He engaged in aplan and scheme in which he gained access to primarily economically disadvantaged minor girls in his home, sexually assaulted these girls, and then gave them money. In or about 2004-2005, Jane Doe, then 16 years old, fell into Epstein's trap and became one of his victims.
+
+9. Upon information and belief, Jeffrey Epstein carried out his scheme and assaulted girls in Florida, New York and on his private island, known as Little St. James, in St
+
+10. An integral player in Epstein's Florida scheme was a Palm Beach Community College student from Loxahatchee, Florida. She recruited girls ostensibly to give <sup>a</sup> wealthy man a massage for monetary compensation in his Palm Beach mansion. Under Epstein's plan, would be contacted when Epstein was planning to be at his Palm Beach residence or soon after he had arrived there. Epstein or someone on his behalf directed to bring one or more underage girls to the residence. , upon information and belief, generally sought out economically disadvantaged underage girls from Loxahatchee and surrounding areas who would be enticed by the money being offered - generally \$200 to \$300 per "massage" session - and who were perceived as less likely to complain to authorities or have credibility if allegations of improper conduct were made. This was an important element of Epstein's plan.
+
+11. Epstein's plan and scheme reflected a particular pattern and method. Upon arrival at Epstein's mansion, the victim would be brought to the kitchen. She would then be led up <sup>a</sup>flight of stairs to abedroom that contained a massage table in addition to other furnishings. Once the girl was alone in this room, Epstein would enter wearing only atowel to cover his private area. He then would lay down on the massage table and perform one or more lewd, lascivious and sexual acts, including masturbation and touching the girl sexually.
+
+12. Consistent with the foregoing plan and scheme, recruited Jane Doe to give Epstein a massage for monetary compensation. brought Jane to Epstein's mansion in Palm Beach. Jane was led up the flight of stairs to the room with the massage table. She was alone in the room when Epstein arrived wearing atowel to cover his private parts. He laid down on the massage table, and sexually assaulted Jane Doe during the massage. In addition, Jeffrey Epstein masturbated during the massage.
+
+13. After Epstein had completed the assault, he left the room. Jane was then able to leave the room and go back down the stairs. She then met again who brought Jane home. Jane was paid \$200 by Epstein. was also paid by Epstein for bringing Jane to him.
+
+14. As aresult of this encounter with Epstein, the 16-year old Jane experienced trauma, shock, confusion, shame, humiliation and embarrassment.
+
+### COUNT I Sexual Assault
+
+15. Plaintiff Jane Doe repeats and realleges paragraphs I through 14 above.
+
+16. Epstein tortiously assaulted Jane Doe sexually in or about 2004-2005. Epstein's acts were intentional, unlawful, offensive and harmful.
+
+17. Epstein's plan and scheme in which he committed such acts upon Jane Doe were done willfully and maliciously.
+
+IS. This sexual assault was in violation of Chapter 800 of the Florida Statutes, which recognizes as <sup>a</sup>crime the lewd and lascivious acts committed by Epstein upon Jane.
+
+19. As adirect and proximate result of Epstein's assault on Jane, she has suffered and will continue to suffer severe and permanent traumatic injuries, including mental, psychological and emotional damages.
+
+WHEREFORE, PlaintiffJane Doe, demands judgment against Defendant Jeffrey Epstein for compensatory damages, punitive damages, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper.
+
+## COUNT II Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress
+
+20. Plaintiffs Jane Doe repeats and realleges paragraphs 1 through 14 above.
+
+21. Epstein's conduct was intentional or reckless.
+
+22. Epstein's conduct was outrageous, going beyond all bounds of decency.
+
+23. Epstein's conduct caused severe emotional distress to Jane Doe. Epstein knew or had reason to know that his intentional and outrageous conduct would cause emotional trauma and damage to Jane Doe.
+
+24. As adirect and proximate result of Epstein's intentional or reckless conduct, Jane Doe has suffered and will continue to suffer severe mental anguish and pain.
+
+WHEREFORE, PlaintiffJane Doe demands judgment against Defendant Jeffrey Epstein for compensatory damages, costs, punitive damages, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper.
+
+# JURY TRIAL DEMAND
+
+Plaintiffs demand a jury trial in this action.
+
+Dated: March A ., 2008
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+HERMAN & MERMELSTE1N, P.A.
+
+Attorneys for Plaintiffs
+
+18205 Biscayne Blvd.
+
+Suite 2218
+
+Miami, Florida 33160
+
+Tel: 305-931-2200
+
+Fax: 305-931-0877
+
+By
+
+Jeffrey M. Herman
+
+ihennanehermanlaw.corn
+
+Florida Bar No. 521647
+
+Stuart S. Mermelstein
+
+smermelstein@hermanlaw.com
+
+Florida Bar No. 947245
+
+Adam D. Horowitz
+
+Florida Bar No. 376980
+
+ahorowitzehermanlaw.com
+
+The JS-44 civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replace nor supplement the filing, and service of pleading or other papers as required by law, except as provided bylocal rules of court This form, approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September 1974, is required for the use of the Clerk of the Court for the purpose of initiating the civil docket sheet. (SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON THE REVERSE OF THE FORM.)
+
+1(a) PLAINTIFFS JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+(b) COUNTY OF RESIDENCE OF FIRST LISTED PLAINTIFF PALM BEACH COUNTY (EXCEPT IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES)
+
+DEFENDANTS JEFFREY EPSTEIN
+
+COUNTY OF RESIDENCE OF FIRST LISTED DEFENDANT NEW YORK (IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES ONLY)
+
+(c) ATTORNEYS (FIRM NAME, ADDRESS, AND TELEPHONE NUMBER) Herman & Mermeistein, PA., 18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218, Miami, FL 33160, (305) 931-2200
+
+(d) CIRCLE COUNTY WHERE ACTION AROSE: PALM BEACH
+
+## II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION (PLACE AN X ONE BOX ONLY)
+
+- O 1 U.S. Government 0 3. Federal Question Plaintiff (D S. Government NO a Pally) O 2. U.S Government X 4. Oiveralty Defendant (Indicate Citizenship of Parties in Item
+- III)
+
+ATTORNEYS (IF KNOWN)
+
+61:0 PrA/ 2n2 32 - 1O9O1-A1s
+
+III. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES
+
+PLACE AN X IN ONE BOX FOR PLAINTIFF (For Diversity Case Only) AND ONE FOR DEFENDANT PTF DEF PTF DEF Incorporated of Principal Place of O 4 O <sup>4</sup>
+
+Citizen of This State X1 01 Buarness in This Stale Cazon of Another State O 2 x 2 Citizen or Subject of a Foreigl Country 0 3 O <sup>3</sup> Incorporated and Rrtnc/pal Place of O 5 O 5 Business in Another State Foreign Nation O 6 CI <sup>6</sup>
+
+#### IV. CAUSE OF ACTION (CITE THE U.S. CIVIL STATUTE UNDER WHICH YOU ARE FILING AND WRITE A BRIEF STATEMENT OF CAUSE. DO NOT CITE JURISDICTIONAL STATUTES UNLESS DIVERSITY.) DIVERSITY ACTION UNDER 28 U.S.C. §1332(a) FOR SEXUAL ASSAULT
+
+IVa. j\_ days estimated (for both sides) to try entire case
+
+V. NATURE OF SUIT (PLACE AN X IN ONE BOX ONLY)
+
+| A CONTRACT                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      | A TORTS                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    | B FORFEITURE PENALTY                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                | A BANKRUPTCY                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       | A OTHER STATUS                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |
+|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| <ul style="list-style-type: none; padding-left: 0;"> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 110 Insurance</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 120 Marine</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 130 Act</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 140 Negotiable Instrument</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 150 Recovery of Overpayment &amp; Enforcement of Judgment</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 151 Medicare Act</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 152 Recovery of Defaulted Student Loans (Excl. Veterans) B</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 153 Recovery of Overpayment of Veteran's Benefits B</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 160 Stockholder's Suits</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 190 Other Contract</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 195 Contract Product Liability</li> </ul> | <p><b>PERSONAL INJURY</b></p> <p><input type="checkbox"/> 310 Airplane<br/> <input type="checkbox"/> 315 Airplane Product Liability<br/> <input type="checkbox"/> 320 Assault, Libel &amp; Slander<br/> <input type="checkbox"/> 330 Federal Employers' Liability<br/> <input type="checkbox"/> 335 Damage<br/> <input type="checkbox"/> 345 Vehicle Product Liability<br/> <input type="checkbox"/> 350 Motor Vehicle<br/> <input type="checkbox"/> 355 Motor Vehicle Product Liability<br/> <input checked="" type="checkbox"/> 360 Other Personal Injury</p> <p><b>PERSONAL PROPERTY</b></p> <p><input type="checkbox"/> 372 Other Fraud<br/> <input type="checkbox"/> 371 Truth in Lending B<br/> <input type="checkbox"/> 380 Other Personnel Property Damage<br/> <input type="checkbox"/> 385 Property Damage Product Liability</p> | <ul style="list-style-type: none; padding-left: 0;"> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 610 Agriculture</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 620 Other Food &amp; Drug</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 625 Drug Related Seizure of Property 21 USC 881</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 630 Liquor Laws</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 640 R.R. &amp; Truck</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 650 Airline Regs</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 660 Occupational Safety/Health</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 690 Other</li> </ul> | <ul style="list-style-type: none; padding-left: 0;"> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 422 Appeal 28 USC 158</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 423 Withdrawal 28 USC 157</li> </ul> <p><b>A PROPERTY RIGHTS</b></p> <p><input type="checkbox"/> 820 Copyrights<br/> <input type="checkbox"/> 830 Patent<br/> <input type="checkbox"/> 840 Trademark</p> | <ul style="list-style-type: none; padding-left: 0;"> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 400 Status Reappointment</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 410 Antitrust</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 430 Banks and Banking</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 450 Commerce/ICC Rates/etc. B</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 480 Deportation</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 470 Racketeer Influenced and Comput Organizations</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 810 Selective Service</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 850 Securities/Commodities/Exchange</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 875 Customer Challenge</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 12USC3410</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 891 Agricultural Acts</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 862 Economic Stabilization Act</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 863 Environmental Matters</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 864 Energy Allocation Act</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 865 Freedom of Information Act</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 900 Appeal of Fee Determination Under Equal Access to Justice</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 950 Constitutionality of State Statutes</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 890 Other Statutory Actions* "A or B"</li> </ul> |
+| A REAL PROPERTY                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 | A CIVIL RIGHTS                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             | B PRISONER PETITIONS                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                | A LABOR                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            | A FEDERAL TAX SUITS                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
+| <ul style="list-style-type: none; padding-left: 0;"> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 210 Land Condemnation</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 220 Foreclosure B</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 230 Rent Lease &amp; Ejectment</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 240 Torts to Land</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 245 Tort Product Liability</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 260 All Other Real Property</li> </ul>                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          | <ul style="list-style-type: none; padding-left: 0;"> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 441 Voting</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 442 Employment</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 443 Housing/Accommodations</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 444 Welfare</li> <li><input type="checkbox"/> 440 Other Civil Rights</li> </ul>                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
+
+VI. ORIGIN <sup>x</sup>1. Original 0 2. Removed from 0 3. Remanded from 0 4. Refilled 0 6. Multidistrict Litigation 0 7. Appeal to District Judge from Proceeding State Court Appellate Court 0 5. Transferred from another district (Specify) Magistrate Judgment
+
+VII. REQUESTED IN COMPLAINT CHECK IF THIS IS A O CLASS ACTION DEMAND O Check conplaint: JURY DEMAND: O UNDER F.R.C.P. <sup>23</sup>
+
+VIII. RELATED (See Instructions): (SEE ATTACHED) CASE(S) IF ANY JUDGE KENNETH A. MARRA Jane Doe 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein DOCKET NUMBER 08-CV-80119-MARRAIMM
+
+DATE 3 - 4 -.4) Y SIGNATURE OF ATTORNEY OF RECORD
+
+Date Pald: Wfp: 54/az/col
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739227/EFTA02739227.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739227/EFTA02739227.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1f21c85f22589808598fa274655676e5d5479327
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739227/EFTA02739227.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,480 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739227.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 6,
+  "chars": 27633,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 9.29,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "COMPLAINT",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            268.755,
+            297.27
+          ],
+          [
+            347.3941955566406,
+            297.27
+          ],
+          [
+            347.3941955566406,
+            311.04
+          ],
+          [
+            268.755,
+            311.04
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Parties, Jurisdiction and Venue",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            225.70499999999998,
+            383.13
+          ],
+          [
+            392.5243835449219,
+            383.13
+          ],
+          [
+            392.5243835449219,
+            397.6299133300781
+          ],
+          [
+            225.70499999999998,
+            397.6299133300781
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Factual Allegations",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            253.38,
+            84.24
+          ],
+          [
+            360.4727478027344,
+            84.24
+          ],
+          [
+            360.4727478027344,
+            99.4151611328125
+          ],
+          [
+            253.38,
+            99.4151611328125
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "COUNT I \nSexual Assault",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            267.525,
+            596.16
+          ],
+          [
+            347.5867614746094,
+            596.16
+          ],
+          [
+            347.5867614746094,
+            623.7
+          ],
+          [
+            267.525,
+            623.7
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "COUNT II \nIntentional Infliction of Emotional Distress",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            194.95499999999998,
+            381.51
+          ],
+          [
+            424.44537353515625,
+            381.51
+          ],
+          [
+            424.44537353515625,
+            410.6700000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            194.95499999999998,
+            410.6700000000001
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "JURY TRIAL DEMAND",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            236.77499999999998,
+            112.59
+          ],
+          [
+            373.58453369140625,
+            112.59
+          ],
+          [
+            373.58453369140625,
+            128.2230224609375
+          ],
+          [
+            236.77499999999998,
+            128.2230224609375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Case 9:08-cv-80232-KAM DocuabIll COV&PcISEHREID Docket 03/05/2008 Page 6 of 6",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            58.91366958618164,
+            12.072021484375
+          ],
+          [
+            559.6500000000001,
+            12.072021484375
+          ],
+          [
+            559.6500000000001,
+            28.35
+          ],
+          [
+            58.91366958618164,
+            28.35
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION \n(PLACE AN X ONE BOX ONLY)",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            20.145967483520508,
+            186.3
+          ],
+          [
+            138.375,
+            186.3
+          ],
+          [
+            138.375,
+            214.64999999999998
+          ],
+          [
+            20.145967483520508,
+            214.64999999999998
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "IV. CAUSE OF ACTION (CITE THE U.S. CIVIL STATUTE UNDER WHICH YOU ARE FILING AND WRITE A BRIEF STATEMENT OF CAUSE. \nDO NOT CITE JURISDICTIONAL STATUTES UNLESS DIVERSITY.) \nDIVERSITY ACTION UNDER 28 U.S.C. \u00a71332(a) FOR SEXUAL ASSAULT",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            21.116561889648438,
+            280.3887023925781
+          ],
+          [
+            568.875,
+            280.3887023925781
+          ],
+          [
+            568.875,
+            311.85
+          ],
+          [
+            21.116561889648438,
+            311.85
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            272
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            33
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            13
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            359
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            365
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            294
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            58
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            21
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            1057
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            183
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            20
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Table",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739227"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739233/EFTA02739233.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739233/EFTA02739233.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fd1b5cc49e45089103ae9b75062d077553af9c16
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739233/EFTA02739233.md
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+AO (Rev. 10/93) Summons in a Civil Action
+
+## United States District Court
+
+Southern DISTRICT OF Florida
+
+## SUMMONS
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+TO: JEFFREY EPSTEIN, individually:
+
+9 East 71st Street New York, NY 10021 CASE NO. 08-m9-80232-Marra-a=
+
+YOU ARE HEREBY SUMMONED and required to serve upon PLAINTIFF'S ATTORNEY,
+
+Jeffrey M. Herman, Esq.
+
+Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq.
+
+Herman & Memtelstein, P.A.
+
+<sup>18205</sup>Biscayne Boulevard, Suite <sup>2218</sup>
+
+Miami, Florida 33160
+
+(305) 931-2200
+
+an answer to the complaint which is herewith served upon you, within 20 days after service of this summons upon you, exclusive of the day of service. If you fail to do so, judgment by default will be taken against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. You must also file your answer with the Clerk of this Court within areasonable period of time after service.
+
+![](_page_0_Picture_22.jpeg)
+
+Steven M. Larimore Clerk of Court
+
+## SUMMONS DATE
+
+si Vernice Deputy Clerk U.S. District Courts March 5, 2008
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739233/EFTA02739233.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739233/EFTA02739233.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cdce3d85f82331698b50b17044f225b024e5e6b5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739233/EFTA02739233.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,138 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739233.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 1,
+  "chars": 1050,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.16,
+  "image_assets": [
+    "_page_0_Picture_22.jpeg"
+  ],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "United States District Court",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            134.07,
+            46.17
+          ],
+          [
+            474.1302185058594,
+            46.17
+          ],
+          [
+            474.1302185058594,
+            73.25286865234375
+          ],
+          [
+            134.07,
+            73.25286865234375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "SUMMONS",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            258.91499999999996,
+            98.82
+          ],
+          [
+            344.02789306640625,
+            98.82
+          ],
+          [
+            344.02789306640625,
+            115.33349609375
+          ],
+          [
+            258.91499999999996,
+            115.33349609375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "SUMMONS DATE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            158.055,
+            526.5
+          ],
+          [
+            330.22332763671875,
+            526.5
+          ],
+          [
+            330.22332763671875,
+            548.3770141601562
+          ],
+          [
+            158.055,
+            548.3770141601562
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            214
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            32
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            22
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Picture",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739233"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739233/_page_0_Picture_22.jpeg b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739233/_page_0_Picture_22.jpeg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..73ff2a918192fe5b829bddc2926205089fb957c1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739233/_page_0_Picture_22.jpeg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:dcb0649ea2042e3fbd1adfdfbc0c1f5e7fdc37426829e0a4baf954af85031faf
+size 15718
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739234/EFTA02739234.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739234/EFTA02739234.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a5d026354990b98e45372cf16da3bee9201060e8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739234/EFTA02739234.md
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.08-80232-CIV-MARRA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+ORDER REQUIRING COUNSEL TO CONFER, FILE JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT AND FILE JOINT DISCOVERY REPORT
+
+THIS ORDER has been entered upon the filing of the complaint. Plaintiff's counsel is hereby ORDERED to forward to all defendants, upon receipt of either an answer or a motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. I2(b), a copy of this order.
+
+It is further ORDERED:
+
+I. Every motion when filed shall be accompanied by a proposed order, except that motions to dismiss and motions for summary judgment need not be accompanied by a proposed order.
+
+2. Pretrial discovery in this case shall be conducted in accord with Local Rule 16.1 and Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
+
+3. Pursuant to Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, unless this action is excluded under Rule 26(a)(I)(E), the parties must confer within twenty-one (21) days after the last responding party either files an answer or a motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b), whichever is earlier, to consider the nature and basis of their claims and defenses and the possibilities for a prompt settlement or resolution of the case, to make or arrange for the
+
+disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1), and to develop a proposed discovery plan that indicates the parties' views and proposals concerning the matters listed in Rule 26(f).
+
+4. The parties are jointly responsible for submitting a written report of this conference outlining the proposed discovery plan within 14 days after the conference.
+
+5. Counsel for the parties shall hold a scheduling conference either at the same time as the discovery conference described in Rule 26(1) or within fourteen (14) calendar days thereafter. See Local Rule 16.1(B).
+
+6. Within fourteen (14) days of the scheduling conference, counsel shall file a joint scheduling report pursuant to Local Rule 16.1(B)(2). This report shall indicate the proposed month and year for the trial plus the estimated number of trial days required, as well as an indication of whether the trial is to be a jury trial or bench trial.
+
+7. The parties may submit a single report combining the discovery plan report and the scheduling conference report.
+
+8. Failure of counsel or unrepresented parties to file a discovery plan report or joint scheduling report may result in dismissal, default, and the imposition of other sanctions including attorney's fees and costs.
+
+DONE AND SIGNED in at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 11i° day of March, 2008.
+
+> KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge
+
+Copies furnished to:
+
+All counsel
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739234/EFTA02739234.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739234/EFTA02739234.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..aa71266e6b04fdc1c42a23e43c4d9a59c1473eca
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739234/EFTA02739234.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,120 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739234.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 2,
+  "chars": 2695,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 0.74,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            206.856,
+            57.50999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            405.5581359863281,
+            57.50999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            405.5581359863281,
+            86.9830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            206.856,
+            86.9830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            11
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739234"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739236/EFTA02739236.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739236/EFTA02739236.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f4277bdb74c3658fe525a55ff31b274497d72194
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739236/EFTA02739236.md
@@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
+**ATTN:**
+
+U.S. SOUTHERN DIST. COURT FLORIDA COUNTY
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3
+
+plaintiff
+
+Index No. 08CV80232
+
+- against -
+
+Date Filed .....
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN
+
+defendant
+
+Office No.
+
+Court Date: / /
+
+STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF NEW YORK :SS:  
+HARRY [REDACTED] being duly sworn, deposes and says; I am over 18 years  
+of age, not a party to this action, and reside in the State of New York. That on the  
+7th day of May, 2008 07:45 AM at
+
+9 EAST 71ST ST  
+NEW YORK, NY 10021
+
+I served the SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT
+
+after prior attempts were made on: 04/23/2008 06:15 PM 04/24/2008 02:30 PM 05/01/2008 06:27PM  
+upon JEFFREY EPSTEIN \*\*
+
+the DEFENDANT therein named by delivering and leaving a true copy or copies  
+of the aforementioned documents with
+
+"JOHN [REDACTED]", ASSISTANT & HOUSE STAFF EMPLOYEE
+
+WHO REFUSED TRUE NAME
+
+a person of suitable age and discretion, who refused access to DEFENDANT's  
+actual apartment, and accepted in accordance with his/her everyday duties.
+
+Deponent describes the person served as aforesaid to the best of deponent's ability  
+at the time and circumstances of the service as follows:
+
+SEX: MALE COLOR: [REDACTED] HAIR: [REDACTED] AGE: 45 HEIGHT: 6:0 WEIGHT: 200
+
+OTHER IDENTIFYING FEATURES: MUSTACHE/BEARD
+
+On 05/12/2008 I deposited in the United States mail a true copy of the aforementioned  
+documents properly enclosed and sealed in a post paid wrapper addressed to the said -  
+DEFENDANT at the above address - That address being -
+
+last known residence, usual place of abode of the DEFENDANT -
+
+Copy mailed 1st class mail marked personal & confidential not indicating on the outside thereof  
+by return address or otherwise that said notice is from an attorney or conserns action against  
+the person to be served. \*\* & 5/5/08 9:20PM
+
+That at the time of service as aforesaid, I asked person spoken to whether DEFENDANT  
+was in the military service of the State of New York or United States and received a negative  
+reply. Upon information and belief based upon the conversation and observation as aforesaid  
+I aver that the DEFENDANT is not in the military service of the State of New York or the  
+United States as that term is defined in the statutes of the State of New York or the Federal  
+Soldiers and Sailors Civil Relief Act.
+
+DEPONENT STATED AT THE TIME OF SERVICE HE HAD LEGAL PAPERS IN A FLORIDA ACTION.
+
+Sworn to before me this
+
+12th day of May 2008ni
+
+SAMSON [REDACTED]
+
+Notary Public, State of New York
+
+No. 01NE-4783767
+
+Qualified in NEW YORK COUNTY
+
+Commission Expires 11/03/2009
+
+HARRY TORRES 0915257  
+AETNA CENTRAL JUDICIAL SERVICES  
+225 BROADWAY, SUITE 1802  
+NEW YORK, NY, 10007  
+Reference No: 3HM4124078
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739236/EFTA02739236.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739236/EFTA02739236.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4a16aa782eef7c03cfca3f42bde097a33a1d6018
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739236/EFTA02739236.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739236.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 1,
+  "chars": 2668,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 11.59,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            80
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739236"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739237/EFTA02739237.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739237/EFTA02739237.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..62d581b7265c0d9b43aa1d1e3c0e5dfe105c86a2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739237/EFTA02739237.md
@@ -0,0 +1,112 @@
+Form 42 - DOORMAN 144221 MILITARY
+
+HERMAN & MERMELSTEIN PA
+
+ATTN:
+
+U.S.SOUTHERN DIST. COURT FLORIDA COUNTY
+
+JANE DOE NO.3
+
+- against -
+
+'plaintiff.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN defendant
+
+Index No. 08CV80232
+
+Date Filed
+
+Office No.
+
+Court Date: / /
+
+STATE OF NEW YORK, COUNTY OF NEW YORK :SS:
+
+HARRY being duly sworn, deposes and says; I am over 18 years
+
+of age, not a party to this action, and reside in the State of New York. That on the 7th day of May, 2008 07:45 AM at
+
+9 EAST 71ST ST
+
+NEW YORK, NY 10021
+
+served the SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT
+
+after prior attempts were made on: 04/23/2008 06:15 PM 04/24/2008 02:30 PM 05/01/2008 06:27PN \* \*
+
+upon JEFFREY EPSTEIN
+
+the DEFENDANT therein named by delivering and leaving a true copy or copies of the aforementioned documents with
+
+"JOHN \*, ASSISTANT & HOUSE STAFF EMPLOYEE
+
+WHO REFUSED TRUE NAME
+
+a person of suitable age and discretion, who refused access to DEFENDANT' s actual apartment, and accepted in accordance with his/her everyday duties.
+
+Deponent describes the person served as aforesaid to the beat of deponent's ability at the time and circumstances of the service as follows:
+
+SEX: MALE COLOR: HAIR: AGE: 45 HEIGHT: 6:0 WEIGHT: 200
+
+OTHER IDENTIFYING FEATURES: MUSTACHE/BEARD
+
+On- 05,3.2712008-1--depefri-ted-in--the-UniteciStatee-Mia-a-trus-copy..af \_tJae\_afor-amentiontd. desume;its-pr,operair-encackried-and-seal.ed-in.a-post..- pal&napper-addr4temecl-4e-Gbe-sa441- IIREENDANT-at theLaboue-addzess ...That-address..being..
+
+leas..t...kncasza. res 4 fience, aisuat-pla.clt-af—abode--of,--the--DEFENDANT-.
+
+Comt\_mailethast-class-mail-marIcsacl-personal-&-conticlentiaL-not £ndioatSng-enfike-eutsida-therec! by-vetrunt-edePeeee-er ethe.. wise- \*herb- •ea -neei-ee- -is -from-an-ISeerneY-e-Oengerea6-aetaieD-aga4Bat the-pareew-tubemserved. \*\* & 5/5/08 9:20PM
+
+That at the time of service as aforesaid, I asked person spoken to whether DEFENDANT was in the military service of the State of New York or United States and received a negative reply. Upon information and belief based upon the conversation and observation as aforesaid I aver that the DEFENDANT is not in the military service of the State of New York o₹ the United States as that term is defined in the statutes of the State of New York or the Federal Soldiers and Sailors Civil Relief Act.
+
+DEPONENT STATED AT THE TIME OF SERVICE HE HAD LEG• P ERS IN A FLORIDA ACTION.
+
+Sworn to before me this
+
+12th day of May/ 2008ni
+
+SAMSON Notary Public, No.01NE-47 3767 York
+
+Qualified in NEW YORK COUNTY Commission Expires 11/03/2009 ORRE 015257
+
+AE A CENTRAL JUDICIAL SERVICES
+
+225 BROADWAY, SUITE 1802
+
+NEW YORK, NY, 10007
+
+Reference No: 3HM4124078
+
+![](_page_0_Picture_44.jpeg)
+
+UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT  
+SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA/ [REDACTED]
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+\_\_\_\_\_/
+
+NON-MILITARY AFFIDAVIT
+
+STATE OF FLORIDA )  
+) SS:  
+COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE )
+
+**BEFORE ME**, the undersigned authority, personally appeared ADAM D. HOROWITZ, ESQ., an attorney of record for the Plaintiff, who is personally known to me, and who after first being duly sworn, deposes and says on personal knowledge that Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, is not on active duty in the armed forces of the United States.
+
+![]()Sworn to and subscribed before me this 29 day of May, 2008.
+
+![]()My Commission expires:
+
+![]()![](_page_1_Picture_124.jpeg)
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739237/EFTA02739237.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739237/EFTA02739237.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b13d7f55df567ddeddd2b53336a614afa2675acf
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739237/EFTA02739237.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,154 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739237.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 2,
+  "chars": 3411,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 5.5,
+  "image_assets": [
+    "_page_0_Picture_44.jpeg",
+    "_page_1_Picture_124.jpeg"
+  ],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            207.194,
+            88.39899999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            405.193,
+            88.39899999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            405.193,
+            115.973
+          ],
+          [
+            207.194,
+            115.973
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "NON-MILITARY AFFIDAVIT",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            221.90599999999995,
+            300.881
+          ],
+          [
+            389.25499999999994,
+            300.881
+          ],
+          [
+            389.25499999999994,
+            314.668
+          ],
+          [
+            221.90599999999995,
+            314.668
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            164
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            64
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            43
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Picture",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            61
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            29
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "Picture",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739237"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739237/_page_0_Picture_44.jpeg b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739237/_page_0_Picture_44.jpeg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..23d51b737ff099c2f3cc6e44e3cad1584d3c26c2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739237/_page_0_Picture_44.jpeg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:56a0412f49bc979a1e1076170f82564b7e1be4c059ab0c4a882524236a28c25f
+size 13597
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739237/_page_1_Picture_124.jpeg b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739237/_page_1_Picture_124.jpeg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..edc4847b74ee7e35234caf2339a776cdbf75de31
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739237/_page_1_Picture_124.jpeg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:59a5e7c941bce1452f74004f60eb5cb56bae296425f2a146f681095e6c46848a
+size 13254
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739239/EFTA02739239.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739239/EFTA02739239.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b234dca829d1a18f8437a09e9b6cfb7f270917cb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739239/EFTA02739239.md
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+/
+
+## DEFAULT
+
+It appearing that the Defendant Jeffrey Epstein is in Default for failure to plead or otherwise defend as required by law. Default is hereby entered as against the said Defendant this day of May, 2008.
+
+CLERK OF COURT
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739239/EFTA02739239.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739239/EFTA02739239.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8d308c294008f53a3d4c8d66045fa205b41386a1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739239/EFTA02739239.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739239.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 1,
+  "chars": 387,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 0.87,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            205.02,
+            86.67
+          ],
+          [
+            405.95098876953125,
+            86.67
+          ],
+          [
+            405.95098876953125,
+            115.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            205.02,
+            115.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "DEFAULT",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            273.564,
+            295.65
+          ],
+          [
+            337.87054443359375,
+            295.65
+          ],
+          [
+            337.87054443359375,
+            310.863037109375
+          ],
+          [
+            273.564,
+            310.863037109375
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            35
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            18
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            9
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739239"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739240/EFTA02739240.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739240/EFTA02739240.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0ea2b6e71647716a5710d322558ebc04b5027b6f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739240/EFTA02739240.md
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA/JOHNSON
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT AGAINST DEFENDANT
+
+Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 3, by and through her undersigned counsel, and pursuant to the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a) and S.D. Ha. L.R. 7.1, hereby files this Motion for Entry of Default Against Defendant, and states as follows:
+
+- 1. On May 7, 2008. Defendant Jeffrey Epstein was served with a Summons and Complaint in this case. A copy of the Affidavit of Service is attached hereto as Exhibit "A".
+- 2. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a)(1), Defendant was required to answer or otherwise serve a response to the Complaint on or before May 27, 2008.
+- 3. To date, Defendant has neither answered the Complaint, filed a response of any kind, nor requested an enlargement of time. Moreover, no attorney has entered an appearance on behalf of the Defendant.
+- 4. The Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein is not on active duty in the armed forces of the United States. See Exhibit "B".
+- 5. Accordingly, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a), Plaintiff applies to this Honorable Court for the entry of default judgment against the Defendant.
+
+WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, JANE DOE NO. 3, respectfully requests this Court to grant this motion in favor of Plaintiff and enter a default against Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN.
+
+Dated: May 29, 2008. Respectfully submitted,
+
+By: s/ Adam D. Horowitz
+
+Jeffrey M. Herman (FL Bar No.
+
+Bar No.
+
+Adam D. Horowitz (FL Bar No.
+
+HERMAN & MERMELSTEIN, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiffs Jane Doe
+
+![](_page_1_Picture_9.jpeg)
+
+## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
+
+I hereby certify that on May 29, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day to all parties on the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CWECF or in some other authorized manner for those parties who are not authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing.
+
+/s/ Adam D. Horowitz
+
+## SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN CASE NO.: 013-CV-80232-MARRA/ United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
+
+Jeffrey Epstein (Via Regular Mail) 9 East 71st Street New York, NY 10021
+
+/s/ Adam D. Horowitz
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739240/EFTA02739240.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739240/EFTA02739240.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c0f936e19d5e055bc6ce97dbde1c8f69404c3f6c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739240/EFTA02739240.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,245 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739240.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 3,
+  "chars": 2436,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 0.92,
+  "image_assets": [
+    "_page_1_Picture_9.jpeg"
+  ],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            405.95098876953125,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            405.95098876953125,
+            115.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            115.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ENTRY \nOF DEFAULT AGAINST DEFENDANT",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            197.06400000000002,
+            295.65
+          ],
+          [
+            415.0776062011719,
+            295.65
+          ],
+          [
+            415.0776062011719,
+            325.10302734375
+          ],
+          [
+            197.06400000000002,
+            325.10302734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            227.052,
+            447.93
+          ],
+          [
+            385.0019836425781,
+            447.93
+          ],
+          [
+            385.0019836425781,
+            462.363037109375
+          ],
+          [
+            227.052,
+            462.363037109375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "SERVICE LIST \nDOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN \nCASE NO.: 013-CV-80232-MARRA/ \nUnited States District Court, Southern District of Florida",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            157.28400000000002,
+            85.05
+          ],
+          [
+            455.6502685546875,
+            85.05
+          ],
+          [
+            455.6502685546875,
+            143.30352783203125
+          ],
+          [
+            157.28400000000002,
+            143.30352783203125
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            56
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            41
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            20
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Picture",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            23
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739240"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739240/_page_1_Picture_9.jpeg b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739240/_page_1_Picture_9.jpeg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cc7e10a844748a71c7fce17f680c99cb4cc4d8e2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739240/_page_1_Picture_9.jpeg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:1a9d522c436152077f750ef54af6a0ae0937447e4375055dd7505465b3cd4d48
+size 3828
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739243/EFTA02739243.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739243/EFTA02739243.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f9d6e809f1a876af571f1c9229d4e070563c2a5b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739243/EFTA02739243.md
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+## IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.:08-CV-80119-MARRA-MMI
+
+JANE DOE NO. 2,
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## NOTICE OF FILING PERMANENT APPEARANCE
+
+The Clerk of Court shall enter the appearance of the undersigned counsel for JEFFREY EPSTEIN, in the above-entitled cause.
+
+DATED: June 13, 2008
+
+I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy hereof has been furnished to Jeffrey M. Herman, Esquire, Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esquire and Adam D. Horowitz, Esq., Herman & Mermelstein, P.A., 18205 Biscayne Blvd, Suite 2218, Miami, Florida, 33160 this 13'h day of June, 2008.
+
+> ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER & WEISS, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 659-8300 Fax: (561)835-8691
+
+/s/Jack A. Goldberger. Esq. JACK A. GOLDBERGER, ESQUIRE Florida Bar No. 262013
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739243/EFTA02739243.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739243/EFTA02739243.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e6a5a8aef3d59dfcb5236fa9ff89e4528dff17ce
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739243/EFTA02739243.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739243.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 1,
+  "chars": 849,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 0.88,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            176.42001342773438,
+            72.9
+          ],
+          [
+            413.898,
+            72.9
+          ],
+          [
+            413.898,
+            101.968017578125
+          ],
+          [
+            176.42001342773438,
+            101.968017578125
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "NOTICE OF FILING PERMANENT APPEARANCE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            153.924,
+            301.32
+          ],
+          [
+            434.502,
+            301.32
+          ],
+          [
+            434.502,
+            316.468017578125
+          ],
+          [
+            153.924,
+            316.468017578125
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739243"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739244/EFTA02739244.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739244/EFTA02739244.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a69a74ad1801871cbc21ae11a6950749a5ab99d4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739244/EFTA02739244.md
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+## EXHIBIT A
+
+**AFFIDAVIT OF RICHARD BARNETT**
+
+I, Richard Barnett, being duly sworn, do depose and state as follows:
+
+1. 1. I am over the age of 18, am otherwise competent to testify and base the following on my personal knowledge.
+2. 2. On May 7, 2008, I received copies of the summons and complaint in four lawsuits:
+   1. a. Jane Doe #2 v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 08-CV-80119,
+   2. b. Jane Doe #3 v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 08-CV-80232,
+   3. c. Jane Doe #4 v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 08-CV-80380, and
+   4. d. Jane Doe #5 v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 08-CV-80381.
+3. 3. I do not now, nor have I ever resided at 9 East 71st Street, New York, New York.
+
+FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NAUGHT.
+
+![]()Sworn and subscribed before me  
+this 12<sup>th</sup> day of June 2008 by  
+Richard Barnett, who  
+is personally known to me. I or did provide  
+as identification.
+
+![]()MY COMMISSION EXPIRES:
+
+LAUREN J. KWINTNER  
+Notary Public, State of New York  
+No. 02KW6016686  
+Qualified in New York County  
+Commission Expires November 30, 20 10
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739244/EFTA02739244.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739244/EFTA02739244.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f0040190566507f7458ccd57127a13db0dfecac8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739244/EFTA02739244.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,147 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739244.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 2,
+  "chars": 1037,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 4.44,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "EXHIBIT A",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            204.18,
+            318.6531066894531
+          ],
+          [
+            404.5699768066406,
+            318.6531066894531
+          ],
+          [
+            404.5699768066406,
+            360.05908203125
+          ],
+          [
+            204.18,
+            360.05908203125
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "AFFIDAVIT OF RICHARD BARNETT",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            178.12,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            419.07000000000005,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            419.07000000000005,
+            101.25
+          ],
+          [
+            178.12,
+            101.25
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            56
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            14
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739244"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739246/EFTA02739246.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739246/EFTA02739246.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5f966c20177c00ec8838fd247ff7d3616d934929
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739246/EFTA02739246.md
@@ -0,0 +1,135 @@
+### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA-]
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+/
+
+## RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR ENTRY OF CLERK'S DEFAULT
+
+Defendant Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(c), hereby opposes plaintiff Jane Doe No. 3's motion for a clerk's default upon the following showing of "good cause."
+
+## Introduction
+
+The clerk's default should not be entered. Service was effected as of June 2. Accordingly the response is due 20 days later, on or before June 23. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1)(A)(i).
+
+The plaintiff, in moving for a clerk's default, implied that service was made in accordance with either federal or Florida procedure. As discussed below, however, service was clearly ineffective under the federal and Florida rules of procedure. Accordingly, the only possibility for valid service was service under New York rules of procedure. Cf. RCP's Lear, LLC v. Taughannock Aviation Corp., No. 5:07-CV-96, 2008 WL 305103, at \*4 (N.D.N.Y. Jan. 31, 2008) (observing that "[a]s a threshold matter, the court must [first] address the rules pursuant to which process was served").
+
+Service of process was valid under New York's rule for so-called "substitute-service" (i.e., service in a manner other than delivery in-hand to the defendant herself or himself), but that statute gives the defendant more time to respond than do the federal or Florida rules. See id. (acknowledging that Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(e)(2) has a "'resided therein' requirement," unlike "New York's substituted service statute," NY CPLR 308); NY CPLR 308 (providing that service is not deemed effected until /0 days after the process-server's affidavit is filed with the Court).
+
+This is not a motion to quash, or a motion arguing that service was completely ineffective. To the contrary, we acknowledge that service was effective under New York procedure, but point out that it was ineffective under Florida and federal procedure. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(e)(1) permits service to be made according to "state law for serving a summons in . . . the state . . . where service is made" as an alternative to following the federal service method (i.e., Rule 4(e)(2)).
+
+As shown below, under New York's so-called "substituted-service" rule, service was effected on June 2, not May 7 (as the plaintiff and the deputy clerk of court evidently believed). Accordingly, the defendant's response to the complaint is not due until June 23. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1)(A)(i) (allowing 20 days from the date of service of process to serve answer),I
+
+## Facts and Procedural History
+
+1. On May 7, 2008, service was delivered at defendant Epstein's house located at 9 East 71st Street, New York, New York, to Richard Barnett, an employee.
+
+2. Mr. Barnett does not reside at that address. See Affidavit of Richard Barnett (attached as Ex. A).
+
+3. On May 29, 2008, the plaintiff moved for an entry of default against Mr. Epstein. [D.E. 5].2 The Clerk of Court has not yet acted on the plaintiff's motion.3
+
+In this case, the 20th day falls on a Saturday (June 21). The answer is therefore due on Monday, June 23. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a)(3) (establishing that when a deadline falls on Saturday, the "period runs until the end of the next day that is not a Saturday").
+
+<sup>2</sup>Notably, the plaintiffs attorney never mailed Mr. Epstein a copy of his motion for a Clerk's entry of default.
+
+<sup>3</sup>The plaintiffs attorney here previously filed an identical action, captioned Jane Doe No. 1 v. Epstein, Case No. 08-80069-KAM, on behalf of a different plaintiff. That action was voluntarily dismissed by the plaintiffs attorney after a motion to intervene was filed by Jane Doe No. 1 (through her mother) indicating that neither Jane Doe No. 1 nor her mother had consented to the attorney's filing the lawsuit on her behalf. See Case No. 08-80069-KAM [D.E. 9].
+
+## Overview of Rules for Service of Process
+
+The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure authorize three distinct methods of service in a diversity action. First, service can be effected in accordance with the procedures "in the state where the district court is located" (here, Florida). See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(e)(1). Second, service can be effected in accordance with the procedures "in the state . .. where service is made" (here, New York). See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(e)(1). Third, service can be effected in accordance with federal procedure. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (e)(2). Cf. David D. Siegel, Practice Commentary on Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Commentary C4-22 (observing that "there is no priority between the [authorized methods of service]") (emphasis added).
+
+Thus, when a diversity action is brought in the Southern District of Florida,
+
+In addition to that action, the same plaintiff's attorney here has filed four other, identical lawsuits against Jeffrey Epstein on behalf of four plaintiffs that are still pending before this Court: Jane Doe No. 2 v. Epstein, Case No. 9:08-cv-80119-KAM; Jane Doe No. 3 v. Epstein, Case No. 9:08-cv-80232-KAM; Jane Doe No. 4 v. Epstein, Case No. 9:08-cv-80380-KAM; and Jane Doe No. 5 v. Epstein, Case No. 9:08-cv-80381-ICAM. Plaintiffs counsel has sought an entry of default in each case. In the Jane Doe No. 2 litigation, the deputy clerk, identified on the docket as "tp," declined to enter a default on the grounds that there had been "Improper Service." See 9:08-cv-80119-KAM [D.E. 7, 8]. In the Jane Doe No. 3 litigation, the deputy clerk has not yet ruled upon the plaintiff's motion. See Case No. 9:08-cv-80232-KAM [D.E. 5]. In the Jane Doe No. 4 and Jane Doe No. 5 litigation, the deputy clerk, identified on both docket sheets as "ail," entered the default. See Case No. 9:08-cv-80380-KAM [D.E. 7, 8] and Case No. 9:08-cv-80381-ICAM [D.E. 5, 6]. Since then, the plaintiff's attorney has moved for a judgment of default in those two cases (Jane Doe Nos. 4 and 5). See Case No. 9:08-cv-80380-ICAM [D.E. 9] and Case No. 9:08-cv-80381-KAM [D.E. 7].
+
+and service is made in New York, service is effective when it complies with either Florida law or New York law, or alternatively, with federal procedure.
+
+As discussed below, because New York does not have a residency requirement for the person to whom substitute-service is delivered (and Florida and the federal rules do), service was effective only in accordance with New York procedure. Cf. RCP's Lear, LLC, 2008 WL 305103, at \*4 (resolving parties' dispute concerning the intended method of service, and applicable procedure). Stated differently, service did not comply with either federal procedure or Florida procedure.
+
+# New York Procedure—CPLR 308 (no residency requirement)
+
+Under New York law, service of process can be effected by delivering the summons "to a person of suitable age and discretion at the . . . dwelling place or usual place of abode of the [defendant]," and when the summons is "mailed to the [defendant] at his or her last known residence or . . . mail[ed] . . . by first class mail to the [defendant] at his or her actual place of business" in accordance with specific technical instructions. N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 308(2) (McKinney 2008). As an additional requirement, "proof of such service shall be filed with the clerk of the court designated in the summons within twenty days of either such delivery or mailing, whichever is effected later." Id.
+
+In accordance with New York procedure, such substituted service "shall be complete ten days after such filing." Id. (emphasis added). Accordingly, New York does not use the date of delivery to the person at the defendant's "abode" as the date service is effected. This was the point of error for the deputy clerk and the plaintiff's attorney.
+
+## Florida Procedure—Fla.,Stat.\* 48.031 (residency requirement)
+
+Under Florida law, service of process can be effected "by leaving the copies [of the summons and complaint] at [the defendant's] usual place of abode with any person residing therein who is 15 years of age or older and informing the person of their contents." Fla. Stat. § 48.031(1)(a) (2007) (emphasis added). Service is deemed effected as of the date of delivery.
+
+# Federal Procedure—Fed. R. Ch. P. 4 (e)(2)(B) (residency requirement)
+
+Service is effective, under federally authorized procedures, when copies of both the summons and the complaint are "le[ft] . . . at the individual's dwelling or usual place of abode with someone of suitable age and discretion who resides there." Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (e)(2)(B). Again, service is deemed effected as of the date of delivery.
+
+#### Discussion
+
+Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's response to the complaint is not due until June 23. Accordingly, the clerk's entry of default was premature. For the following "good cause," it should be set aside. Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(c) ("The court may set aside an entry of default for good cause.").
+
+# A. Service was not made on someone who "resided" at the subject address.
+
+Substituted service was attempted on Richard Barnett at a house owned by Mr. Epstein located at 9 East 71st Street, New York, New York. See Affidavit of Service [D.E. 4]. Mr. Barnett has never lived there.4 (Barnett Aff.1 3.)
+
+### B. Because service was not made on someone who "resided" at the subject address, service was effective only in accordance with New York procedure.
+
+Of the three possible methods of service in this case—New York service, Florida service, and federal-rules service—only New York rules allow substituted service on someone who does not "reside" at the service address. Compare Fla. Stat. § 48.031(1)(a) (authorizing substituted service of process only on a person meeting certain criteria who "reside[s]" at the service address), and Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (e)(2)(B) (same), with NY CPLR 308(2) (authorizing so-called "leave-and-mail"
+
+<sup>4</sup> Indeed, in a motion for an order compelling the Clerk to enter default against Mr. Epstein, filed in connection with the Jane Doe No. 2 litigation, the plaintiff's attorney characterized Mr. Barnett simply as an "Assistant and House Staff Employee," not a resident of the property. Case No. 9:08-cv-80119-KAM [D.E. 9 at 2].
+
+substituted service, which does not require delivery to a person who actually resides the service address).
+
+Because Mr. Barnett was not a resident of 9 East 71st Street, logically, service could have been effected only in accordance with New York procedure.
+
+# C. Service was effective as of June 2, not earlier.
+
+As noted above, Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 permits service according to the law "in the state . . . where service is made," here, New York. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(e)(1). While New York permits substitute service on a non-resident at the defendant's "abode," such substituted service is not complete until 10 days after the affidavit reciting the method of service is actually filed with the Court. See NY CPLR 308(2).
+
+Although the summons was left with Mr. Barnett at Epstein's New York home on May 7, the affidavit of service was not filed with the Court until May 22. Accordingly, under NY CPLR 308(2), service is not deemed complete until 10 days later, which was June 2. Counting 20 days more according to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1)(A)(i) and 5, Mr. Epstein's response is still not due until June 23. Accordingly, the plaintiffs motion for default was almost three weeks early and the default was entered improperly.
+
+## D. "Actual" notice is irrelevant.
+
+In the related Jane Doe No. 2 case, the plaintiff advances the untenable position that the service rules are trumped simply because Epstein had "actual notice" of the complaints. See D.E. 9 at 4,1 9 (Jane Doe No. 2 v. Epstein, Case No. 9:08-cv-80119-ICAM) ("Defendant Epstein had actual notice of the filing of the Complaint, and the Plaintiff has exercised diligence and good faith in attempting to serve Defendant Epstein with process. Accordingly, entry of default is appropriate."). The Eleventh Circuit is clear, however, that "actual notice of a suit does not dispose of the requirements of service of process." v. Warden, FCC Coleman-USP, 259 Fed. Appx. 181, 182 n.2 (11th Cir. 2007) (citing Mfrs. Hanover Trust Co. v. Ponsoldt, 51 F.3d 938, 940 (11th Cir.1995)).
+
+## Conclusion
+
+We do not dispute that service was effective. We only dispute the date that it became effective. Since service was ineffective under both Florida law and the federal-rules alternative (because the recipient of the service did not "reside" at the address), the only service law that could apply is New York's. New York's rule for substituted-service does not start the 20-day clock for responding to the complaint until 10 days after the process-server's affidavit is filed with the Court.
+
+Accordingly, the 20-day clock did not start to tick (Le., service was not deemed to have been effected) until June 2. Counting time as provided by Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a)(3), Epstein has until June 23 to serve a response to the complaint.
+
+WHEREFORE, "good cause" having been showing under Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(c), the clerk's default should not be entered.
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER & WEISS, P.A.
+
+250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Tel: 561 659 8300 Fax: 561 835 8691
+
+By: /s/ Jack A. Goldberger Jack A. Goldberger Ha. Bar No. 262013 jgoldberger@ agwpa.com
+
+Attorneys for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
+
+### CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL RULE 7
+
+Counsel for defendant has conferred in good faith with counsel for the plaintiff, who opposes the relief requested in this motion.
+
+/s/ Jack A. Goldberger
+
+Jack A. Goldberger
+
+## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
+
+I HEREBY CERTIFY that on June 13, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on counsel of record identified below by facsimile and U.S. Mail.
+
+Jeffrey M. Herman, Esq. Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Herman & Mermelstein, P.A. 18205 Biscayne Blvd, Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160 Fax: 305 931 0877
+
+/s/ Jack A. Goldberger
+
+Jack A. Goldberger
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739246/EFTA02739246.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739246/EFTA02739246.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8beb59170ae63dd52c2b9434012af5c36fb82ef9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739246/EFTA02739246.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,811 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739246.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 11,
+  "chars": 14092,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.43,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            183.6,
+            88.28999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            417.3464050292969,
+            88.28999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            417.3464050292969,
+            120.88092041015625
+          ],
+          [
+            183.6,
+            120.88092041015625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR ENTRY OF CLERK'S DEFAULT",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            100.36800000000001,
+            353.15999999999997
+          ],
+          [
+            512.4267578125,
+            353.15999999999997
+          ],
+          [
+            512.4267578125,
+            370.2509460449219
+          ],
+          [
+            100.36800000000001,
+            370.2509460449219
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Introduction",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            264.384,
+            481.95000000000005
+          ],
+          [
+            347.4720764160156,
+            481.95000000000005
+          ],
+          [
+            347.4720764160156,
+            498.8809509277344
+          ],
+          [
+            264.384,
+            498.8809509277344
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Facts and Procedural History",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            214.812,
+            232.46999999999997
+          ],
+          [
+            398.17950439453125,
+            232.46999999999997
+          ],
+          [
+            398.17950439453125,
+            249.3714599609375
+          ],
+          [
+            214.812,
+            249.3714599609375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Overview of Rules for Service of Process",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            182.988,
+            72.08999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            431.10662841796875,
+            72.08999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            431.10662841796875,
+            89.00091552734375
+          ],
+          [
+            182.988,
+            89.00091552734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "New York Procedure\u2014CPLR 308 (no residency requirement)",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            118.116,
+            361.26
+          ],
+          [
+            494.6922607421875,
+            361.26
+          ],
+          [
+            494.6922607421875,
+            378.5009460449219
+          ],
+          [
+            118.116,
+            378.5009460449219
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Florida Procedure\u2014Fla.,Stat.* 48.031 (residency requirement)",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            114.44400000000002,
+            232.46999999999997
+          ],
+          [
+            498.79638671875,
+            232.46999999999997
+          ],
+          [
+            498.79638671875,
+            249.50091552734375
+          ],
+          [
+            114.44400000000002,
+            249.50091552734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Federal Procedure\u2014Fed. R. Ch. P. 4 (e)(2)(B) (residency requirement)",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            91.18799999999999,
+            425.25
+          ],
+          [
+            521.616943359375,
+            425.25
+          ],
+          [
+            521.616943359375,
+            442.6209411621094
+          ],
+          [
+            91.18799999999999,
+            442.6209411621094
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Discussion",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            271.728,
+            72.9
+          ],
+          [
+            340.8253173828125,
+            72.9
+          ],
+          [
+            340.8253173828125,
+            88.491455078125
+          ],
+          [
+            271.728,
+            88.491455078125
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "A. Service was not made on someone who \"resided\" at the subject address.",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            68.544,
+            232.46999999999997
+          ],
+          [
+            540.0640258789062,
+            232.46999999999997
+          ],
+          [
+            540.0640258789062,
+            250.1214599609375
+          ],
+          [
+            68.544,
+            250.1214599609375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "B. Because service was not made on someone who \"resided\" at the subject \naddress, service was effective only in accordance with New York \nprocedure.",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            68.544,
+            361.26
+          ],
+          [
+            543.847412109375,
+            361.26
+          ],
+          [
+            543.847412109375,
+            410.6214599609375
+          ],
+          [
+            68.544,
+            410.6214599609375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "C. Service was effective as of June 2, not earlier.",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            68.544,
+            200.07
+          ],
+          [
+            382.2289733886719,
+            200.07
+          ],
+          [
+            382.2289733886719,
+            217.491455078125
+          ],
+          [
+            68.544,
+            217.491455078125
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "D. \"Actual\" notice is irrelevant.",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            69.156,
+            72.08999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            283.8944396972656,
+            72.08999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            283.8944396972656,
+            89.00091552734375
+          ],
+          [
+            69.156,
+            89.00091552734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Conclusion",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            269.892,
+            426.06000000000006
+          ],
+          [
+            342.80718994140625,
+            426.06000000000006
+          ],
+          [
+            342.80718994140625,
+            443.0009460449219
+          ],
+          [
+            269.892,
+            443.0009460449219
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL RULE 7",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 10,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            118.116,
+            104.49
+          ],
+          [
+            495.2377624511719,
+            104.49
+          ],
+          [
+            495.2377624511719,
+            120.88092041015625
+          ],
+          [
+            118.116,
+            120.88092041015625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 10,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            209.91600000000003,
+            281.07
+          ],
+          [
+            402.6063232421875,
+            281.07
+          ],
+          [
+            402.6063232421875,
+            297.8809509277344
+          ],
+          [
+            209.91600000000003,
+            297.8809509277344
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            43
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            22
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            45
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            23
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            57
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            56
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            29
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            43
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            22
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            41
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            20
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            41
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            21
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            41
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            21
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 9,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            39
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            20
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 10,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            43
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            22
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739246"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739257/EFTA02739257.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739257/EFTA02739257.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d7a06fb86374849d9a3383f67971bd7310b41335
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739257/EFTA02739257.md
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
+#### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.. 08-CV-80232—MARRAH
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+# DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR STAY
+
+Defendant Jeffrey Epstein respectfully moves for a mandatory stay of this action under Title 18, United States Code, Section 3509(k). As discussed below, this action is subject to a mandatory stay based on the existence of two pending parallel criminal actions.
+
+# Introduction
+
+This civil action is a private counterpart to two ongoing criminal actions, one in Palm Beach state court, the other in Miami federal court. Both cases purport to arise from the same occurrence: the alleged sexual assault of a minor, Jane Doe No. 3. A federal statute directly on point provides that when an alleged sexual assault involving a child victim results in a "criminal proceeding," a commonly
+
+derived civil suit "shall be stayed until the end of all phases of the criminal action." 18 U.S.C. § 3509(k) (emphasis added).' A stay of this case is required until there is no longer a pending criminal action derived from the same underlying allegations. See 18 U.S.C. § 3509(k).
+
+### Discussion
+
+The parallel state criminal action pending in Palm Beach Circuit Court is still in the discovery phase. State of Florida v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 2006 CF 09454 AXX (Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County). Meanwhile, there is also a parallel federal criminal grand jury action pending in the Southern District of Florida. In re Grand Jury, No. FGJ 07-103(WPB) (S.D. Fla.) Both cases arise out of the same occurrence and allege that the minor plaintiff is a victim.
+
+The language-of section 3509(k) of title 18, United States Code, is clear: a parallel "civil action shall be stayed until the end of all phases of the criminal
+
+If, at any time that a cause of action for recovery of compensation for damage or injury to the person of a child exists, a criminal action is pending which arises out of the same occurrence and in which the child is the victim, the civil action shall be stayed until the end of all phases of the criminal action and any mention of the civil action during the criminal proceeding is prohibited. As used in this subsection, a criminal action is pending until its final adjudication in the trial court.
+
+The full text of the mandatory-stay provision reads:
+
+<sup>18</sup> U.S.C. § 3509(k).
+
+action." 18 U.S.C.. § 3509(k) (emphasis added). When it comes to statutory construction, the mandatory nature of the word "shall" is well-settled. See, e.g., .= 531 U.S. 230, 241 (2001) (noting Congress' "use of a mandatory `shall' to impose discretionless obligations") (emphasis added); Lexecon Inc. v. Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach, 523 U.S. 26, 35 (1998) (explaining that "the mandatory `shall' . . . normally creates an obligation impervious to judicial discretion") (emphasis added). Cf. \_My. .= 530 U.S. 327, 350 (2000) ("Through the PLRA [Prison Litigation Reform Act], Congress clearly intended to make operation of the automatic stay mandatory, precluding courts from exercising their equitable powers to enjoin the stay. And we conclude that this provision does not violate separation of powers principles.") (emphasis added).
+
+One district court within the Eleventh Circuit, facing the identical issue with a pending state prosecution, recently construed "the plain language of § 3509(k)" as "requiling] a stay in a case . . . where . . . a parallel criminal action [is] pending." Doe v. Francis, No. 5:03 CV 260 MCR/WCS, 2005 WL 950623, at \*2 (N.D. Fla. Apr. 20, 2005) (Francis II) (emphasis added). Accord Doe v. Francis, No. 5:03 CV 260 MCR/WCS, 2005 WL 517847, at \*1-2 (N.D. Fla. Feb. 10, 2005) (Francis 1) (staying federal civil action in favor of "a criminal case currently pending in state court in Bay County, Florida, arising from the same facts and involving the same parties as the Instant action," noting that "the language of 18
+
+U.S.C. § 3509(k) is clear that a stay is required in a case such as this where a parallel criminal action is pending which arises from the same occurrence involving minor victims") (emphasis added). There is no contrary opinion from any court.
+
+In determining that the federal stay provision is mandatory, the Francis II court expressed that there was apparently no case law supporting, or even "discussing the [avoidance] of a stay [under the command of] § 3509(k)." Francis II, 2005 WL 950623, at \*2. Deferring to the statute as written, the Francis H court rejected the plaintiffs' argument that some of the alleged victims had already reached their majority. See id. The court similarly rejected the plaintiffs' argument that it would be in the victims' best interests to avoid a stay so as to counteract the victims' "ongoing and increasing mental harm due to the `frustrating delay in both the criminal case and [the civil] case.' Id. The Francis H court, in adhering to the plain language of the statute, also adhered to the "well established priority of criminal proceedings over civil proceedings." Cf. United States v. Hanhardt, 156 F. Supp. 2d 988, 1000 (N.D. Ill. 2001) (citing Fed. R. Crim. P. 50(a)).
+
+#### Conclusion
+
+Because this civil action arises from the same allegations as two pending criminal actions, § 3509(k) mandates a stay of this civil action.
+
+WHEREFORE, Defendant Jeffrey Epstein respectfully requests that the Court enter a stay under 18 U.S.C. § 3509(k), coextensive with the state and federal criminal actions.
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER & WEISS, P.A.
+
+250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Tel: 561 659 8300 Fax: 561 835 8691
+
+By: /s/ Jack A. Goldberger Jack A. Goldberger Fla. Bar No. 262013 jgoldberger@agwpa.com
+
+Attorneys for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
+
+# CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL RULE 7
+
+Counsel for defendant has conferred in good faith with counsel for the plaintiff, who opposes the relief requested in this motion.
+
+/s/ Jack A. Goldberger
+
+Jack A. Goldberger
+
+#### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
+
+I HEREBY CERTIFY that on June 20, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on counsel of record identified below by facsimile and U.S. Mail.
+
+Jeffrey M. Herman, Esq. Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Herman & Mermelstein, P.A. 18205 Biscayne Blvd, Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160 Fax: 305 931 0877
+
+/s/ Jack A. Goldberger
+
+Jack A. Goldberger
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739257/EFTA02739257.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739257/EFTA02739257.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2114484d437277f9f14533818fb07c6c8456585c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739257/EFTA02739257.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,410 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739257.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 6,
+  "chars": 6541,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 0.97,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            186.66,
+            68.03999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            417.7316589355469,
+            68.03999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            417.7316589355469,
+            103.24591064453125
+          ],
+          [
+            186.66,
+            103.24591064453125
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR STAY",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            181.17,
+            342.63
+          ],
+          [
+            421.9034118652344,
+            342.63
+          ],
+          [
+            421.9034118652344,
+            361.6259460449219
+          ],
+          [
+            181.17,
+            361.6259460449219
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Introduction",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            259.25,
+            503.82
+          ],
+          [
+            342.2320556640625,
+            503.82
+          ],
+          [
+            342.2320556640625,
+            522.4959411621094
+          ],
+          [
+            259.25,
+            522.4959411621094
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Discussion",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            267.18,
+            198.45000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            337.4374694824219,
+            198.45000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            337.4374694824219,
+            216.86590576171875
+          ],
+          [
+            267.18,
+            216.86590576171875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Conclusion",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            281.82,
+            617.22
+          ],
+          [
+            354.76983642578125,
+            617.22
+          ],
+          [
+            354.76983642578125,
+            634.2559509277344
+          ],
+          [
+            281.82,
+            634.2559509277344
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL RULE 7",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            103.70000000000002,
+            84.24
+          ],
+          [
+            476.222900390625,
+            84.24
+          ],
+          [
+            476.222900390625,
+            102.87591552734375
+          ],
+          [
+            103.70000000000002,
+            102.87591552734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            204.35000000000002,
+            262.44
+          ],
+          [
+            395.7105407714844,
+            262.44
+          ],
+          [
+            395.7105407714844,
+            280.2459411621094
+          ],
+          [
+            204.35000000000002,
+            280.2459411621094
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            41
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            21
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            49
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            43
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            22
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            45
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            23
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            35
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            18
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            43
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            22
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739257"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739263/EFTA02739263.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739263/EFTA02739263.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3309430eda3558c719c7c8ef73ea27f458066c47
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739263/EFTA02739263.md
@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
+#### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232—MARRAH
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+### DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
+
+Defendant Jeffrey Epstein moves, pursuant to S.D. Fla. L.R. 7.1(A), for an enlargement of time to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint until ten days after his motion for a mandatory stay, filed contemporaneously with this motion, is decided, and as grounds for this relief respectfully states as follows:
+
+- 1. This civil action is a private counterpart to two ongoing criminal actions, one in Palm Beach state court, the other in the Southern District of Florida.
+- 2. These cases purport to arise from the same occurrence: the alleged sexual assault of a minor, Jane Doe No. 3.
+- 3. On June 20, 2008, Mr. Epstein filed a motion seeking a stay of this action under 18 U.S.C. § 3509. Under that section, when an alleged sexual assault
+
+involving a child victim results in a "criminal proceeding," a commonly derived civil suit "shall be stayed until the end of all phases of the criminal action." 18 U.S.C. § 3509(k) (emphasis added).
+
+4. If Mr. Epstein's stay motion is granted, he will not be required to respond to the Complaint or otherwise litigate this action until the two pending criminal matters are resolved.
+
+WHEREFORE, Defendant Jeffrey Epstein respectfully requests an enlargement of time to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint until ten days after his motion for a stay is decided.
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER & WEISS, P.A.
+
+250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Tel: 561 659 8300 Fax: 561 835 8691
+
+By: /s/ Jack A. Goldberger Jack A. Goldberger Fla. Bar No. 262013 j goldberger@agwpa.com
+
+Attorneys for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
+
+# CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL RULE 7
+
+Counsel for defendant has conferred in good faith with counsel for the plaintiff, who opposes the relief requested in this motion.
+
+/s/ Jack A. Goldberger
+
+Jack A. Goldberger
+
+# CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
+
+I HEREBY CERTIFY that on June 20, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on counsel of record identified below by facsimile and U.S. Mail.
+
+Jeffrey M. Herman, Esq. Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Herman & Mermelstein, P.A. 18205 Biscayne Blvd, Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160 Fax: 305 931 0877
+
+/s/ Jack A. Goldberger
+
+Jack A. Goldberger
+
+#### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232—MARRA—:
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+### ORDER
+
+THIS CAUSE having come to be heard on the Defendant's Motion for An Enlargement of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint, and this Court being fully advised, it is hereby:
+
+ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion is hereby granted.
+
+DONE AND ORDERED in Miami-Dade County, Florida this day of , 2008.
+
+> KENNETH A. MARRA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
+
+Copies furnished to: Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. Jeffrey M. Herman, Esq.
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739263/EFTA02739263.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739263/EFTA02739263.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4c4ac9376faad4162f60abd5e331b06cfd880db3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739263/EFTA02739263.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,319 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739263.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 4,
+  "chars": 3197,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 0.93,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            186.66,
+            68.03999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            417.7193603515625,
+            68.03999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            417.7193603515625,
+            102.49591064453125
+          ],
+          [
+            186.66,
+            102.49591064453125
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF \nTIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            88.45,
+            341.82
+          ],
+          [
+            516.2113647460938,
+            341.82
+          ],
+          [
+            516.2113647460938,
+            376.9959411621094
+          ],
+          [
+            88.45,
+            376.9959411621094
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL RULE 7",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            117.12,
+            67.23
+          ],
+          [
+            490.472900390625,
+            67.23
+          ],
+          [
+            490.472900390625,
+            86.37591552734375
+          ],
+          [
+            117.12,
+            86.37591552734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            205.57000000000002,
+            244.61999999999998
+          ],
+          [
+            397.2105407714844,
+            244.61999999999998
+          ],
+          [
+            397.2105407714844,
+            263.74591064453125
+          ],
+          [
+            205.57000000000002,
+            263.74591064453125
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            187.88000000000002,
+            68.03999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            418.4716491699219,
+            68.03999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            418.4716491699219,
+            102.11590576171875
+          ],
+          [
+            187.88000000000002,
+            102.11590576171875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "ORDER",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            273.89000000000004,
+            342.63
+          ],
+          [
+            330.9102783203125,
+            342.63
+          ],
+          [
+            330.9102783203125,
+            360.4959411621094
+          ],
+          [
+            273.89000000000004,
+            360.4959411621094
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            43
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            22
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            47
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            24
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            43
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            22
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            41
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            21
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739263"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739267/EFTA02739267.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739267/EFTA02739267.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3419121af2dc906db97bd9ae8f4718b2fe69536c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739267/EFTA02739267.md
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+# REPLY MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR ENTRY OF CLERK'S DEFAULT
+
+Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 3, by and through her undersigned counsel, submits this Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion for Entry of Clerk's Default, as follows:
+
+# Introduction
+
+Defendant Jeffrey Epstein claims that service of process on him was ineffective under Florida or Federal law, based solely on a "bare bones" affidavit that raises more questions than it answers. At a minimum, the issue of whether service was effective under Florida or Federal law is at this point one of fact which should be the subject of discovery.
+
+#### The Affidavit Attached to the Defendant's Response to the Motion is Insufficient
+
+Service of process was effected at Jeffrey Epstein's New York residence on May 7, 2008, at 7:45 a.m. by handing a copy of the Summons and Complaint to a person in Defendant's residence who refused to identify himself. (See Affidavit of Service). Defendant now attaches to his Response as Exhibit "A" the Affidavit of Richard Barnett, who claims to have received the copies of the Summons and Complaint on May 7, 2008 at Defendant Epstein's residence. In this Affidavit,
+
+Mr. Barnett states very little. He asserts that he does not now, nor has he ever, resided at 9 E. 71st Street, New York, New York (Mr. Epstein's residence). He fails to state in this Affidavit, however, where he does live, if not at the residence in question; what he was doing at the subject address when service was made; his relationship with Defendant Epstein, and how often he was at the residence; or why he refused to identify himself to the process server. He also fails to state who instructed him to answer the door on May 7, 2008 and take service anonymously.
+
+The Court may grant limited discovery on the issue of service of process. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico v. SS Zoc Colocotroni 61 F.R.D. 653, 656-57 (D.P.R. 1974) ("discovery regarding the legal sufficiency of service of process so as to acquire in personam jurisdiction over the person of a defendant is permitted by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, specifically Rule 26"). See also Blair v. City of Worcester, 522 F.3d 105, Ill (1st Cir. 2008); Monteiro v. San Nicolas, S.A., 254 F.2d 514, 516-17 (2d Cir. 1958) (holding that discovery was appropriate on disputed issues of service of process). The parties do not dispute that if the person who in fact received the copies of the summons and complaint resided at the residence, then service would have been valid under Florida or Federal law on May 7, 2008.1 See National Development Co. v. Triad Holding Corp. 930 F.2d 253 (2d Cir. 1991) (upholding service of process on housekeeper of defendant's New York apartment, under Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(d)(1) [now 4(e)(2)], because the defendant was actually living in the apartment at the time service was effected). Alternatively, if the difficulties encountered in
+
+<sup>&#</sup>x27; Defendant notes that under Rule 4(e) there is no priority between alternative methods of service. This means that Plaintiff has the option of perfecting service under either federal law, the law of the forum state, or the law of the state where service is made: "Either may be turned to with no attempted prior resort to the other." Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 (Commentary C4-22). It does not stand, however, for the proposition that the defendant can accept service under New York law, while ignoring valid service under Florida or Federal law. Accordingly, once valid service was made on Defendant Epstein under Federal or Florida law on May 7, 2008, Defendant was required to answer to otherwise respond to the Complaint by May 27, 2008 to avoid default, which he failed to do.
+
+serving Mr. Epstein were the result of Mr. Epstein's deliberate avoidance or deception, while knowing of the lawsuit, then it would likewise be appropriate to find good service and a default. deg
+
+Keevan & Son , Inc. v. Callier Pipe & Tube, Inc., 107 F.R.C. 665, 671-72 (S.D. Fl.a. 1985) ("[e]ffective service is most likely found when a defendant has engaged in deception to avoid service of process"). Based on what Mr. Bamett's Affidavit does not disclose, Plaintiff should be granted discovery to determine whether service was proper under Florida or Federal law. Plaintiff would at a minimum like to take the depositions of Mr. Barnett and Mr. Epstein with regard to the service of process issues that have arisen in this matter.
+
+# Conclusion
+
+Based on the foregoing, Plaintiff requests that this Court allow Plaintiff to take discovery on the issue of service of process; conduct an evidentiary hearing on the validity of service under Florida or Federal law; enter an Order compelling the Clerk to enter a default against Defendant Epstein pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 55(a); and such other and further relief as this Court deems proper.
+
+Dated: June 24, 2008. Respectfully submitted,
+
+By: s/ Jeffrey M. Herman
+
+Jeffrey M. Herman (FL Bar No. 521647)
+
+jherman@hermanlaw.com
+
+Stuart S. Mermelstein (FL Bar No. 947245)
+
+ssm@hermanlaw.com
+
+Adam D. Horowitz (FL Bar No. 376980)
+
+ahorowitz@hermanlaw.com
+
+HERMAN & MERMELSTEIN, P.A.
+
+Attorneys for Plaintiffs Jane Doe
+
+18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218
+
+Miami, Florida 33160
+
+Tel: 305-931-2200
+
+Fax: 305-931-0877
+
+# CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
+
+I hereby certify that on June 24, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing document NA it li the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day to all parties on the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those parties who are not authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing.
+
+Is/ Jeffrey M. Herman
+
+## SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA/ffi United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger jagesq@bellsouth.net
+
+/s/Jeffery M. Herman
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739267/EFTA02739267.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739267/EFTA02739267.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..aeae980e93137c621f140a2c7e89da7d22969351
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739267/EFTA02739267.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,376 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739267.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 5,
+  "chars": 6113,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.31,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            406.3231201171875,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            406.3231201171875,
+            115.18353271484375
+          ],
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            115.18353271484375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "REPLY MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF \nMOTION FOR ENTRY OF CLERK'S DEFAULT",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            173.19599999999997,
+            295.65
+          ],
+          [
+            439.49053955078125,
+            295.65
+          ],
+          [
+            439.49053955078125,
+            325.10302734375
+          ],
+          [
+            173.19599999999997,
+            325.10302734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Introduction",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            271.116,
+            393.65999999999997
+          ],
+          [
+            340.27200000000005,
+            393.65999999999997
+          ],
+          [
+            340.27200000000005,
+            409.10302734375
+          ],
+          [
+            271.116,
+            409.10302734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "The Affidavit Attached to the Defendant's \nResponse to the Motion is Insufficient",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            195.228,
+            533.79
+          ],
+          [
+            417.45361328125,
+            533.79
+          ],
+          [
+            417.45361328125,
+            562.5635223388672
+          ],
+          [
+            195.228,
+            562.5635223388672
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Conclusion",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            274.788,
+            310.23
+          ],
+          [
+            337.39495849609375,
+            310.23
+          ],
+          [
+            337.39495849609375,
+            325.10302734375
+          ],
+          [
+            274.788,
+            325.10302734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            227.052,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            385.0019836425781,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            385.0019836425781,
+            100.863037109375
+          ],
+          [
+            227.052,
+            100.863037109375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "SERVICE LIST \nDOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN \nCASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA/ffi \nUnited States District Court, Southern District of Florida",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            157.28400000000002,
+            85.05
+          ],
+          [
+            455.1346740722656,
+            85.05
+          ],
+          [
+            455.1346740722656,
+            143.68353271484375
+          ],
+          [
+            157.28400000000002,
+            143.68353271484375
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            59
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            70
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            30
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            63
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            31
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            18
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            24
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            11
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            24
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            11
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739267"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739272/EFTA02739272.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739272/EFTA02739272.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4532aaaec4f201e707b4adf002f524bdad90845b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739272/EFTA02739272.md
@@ -0,0 +1,183 @@
+## EXHIBIT A
+
+DIV : NO  
+CASE NO : 5020000000000000 ST OF FL VS. JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN 241  
+Charges : FILED OFFER TO COMMIT PROSTITUTION
+
+AGREEST & COMMENTARY RECORD DOCTIC COPIES OF 3,000 DO
+
+Date 3/20/08 6/30/08 Judge PC III Ctr. Rep. C. DAFMIS  
+ ASA L. Beloil AMWork DC PBO Int [redacted]  
+ Deft---Pres / Not Pres. W / W/O Def. Co. G. O. D. Berger Esq / PD---Pres / Not Pres.  
+ Before the Court for: Statuschool  
+ Granted  Denied  With / Without Prejudice  Withdrawn  Court Reserves Ruling  Written Order to Follow  
+ Warrant  Ordered  Recalled  Bond Set at \$ \_\_\_\_\_  See Below  Also Covers  Sp Cond  
+ Bond Forf  OR: Disch/Revoked/Reinstated  Bond: Disch/Revoked  SOR: Disch/Revoked/Reinstated  
+ Bond Forf Vacated  Previous Bond Reinstated, if Bondsman agrees  State failed to file charges  Released O.R. / S.O.R.  
+ Deft \_\_\_ Indigent  PD Appt  Hrg only PD Pres \_\_\_\_\_  Court Appts \_\_\_\_\_  
+ Evaluation for:  Drug Farm  DOC Non-Secure Bed by \_\_\_\_\_  
+ Pre-Plea  PSI ordered by/within \_\_\_\_\_ days  w/input from DJJ / Staffing  
+ Referred to: PTI / SAAP / PADD  Case placed on the absentee docket  
+ DEFT ENTERED A PLEA OF:  NOT GUILTY  GUILTY  NO CONTEST  BEST INTEREST  TO THE COURT  
+ As Charged-Cts O. N. L. Lesser Cts \_\_\_\_\_ Lesser Charge \_\_\_\_\_  
+ Sw & Test  Adv of Rts  Waived PSI Lesser Cts \_\_\_\_\_ Lesser Charge \_\_\_\_\_  
+ ADJ GUILTY as Charged as to Cts O. N. L. Lesser Cts \_\_\_\_\_  
+ FOUND GUILTY as Charged as to Cts \_\_\_\_\_ Lesser Cts \_\_\_\_\_  
+ ADJ W/HELD as to Cts \_\_\_\_\_  SENT W/HELD as to Cts \_\_\_\_\_  
+ FOUND AND ADJUDICATED DELINQUENT as to Cts \_\_\_\_\_  Dismiss  Nolle Prosse Cts \_\_\_\_\_  Dispo Order to follow / Filed  
+ FOUND & ADJ NOT GUILTY as to Cts \_\_\_\_\_  Dismiss  Nolle Prosse Cts \_\_\_\_\_  
+ Prob / Comm Control:  Revoked  Reinstated  Modified  Term. Successfully / Unsuccessfully  
+ Stip/Found: (violent) Habitual Off. 775.084  Stip/Found: Sexual Offender / Sexual Predator  Stip/Found: P.R.R.  
+ SENTENCE: PBCJ 12 MOS Cts: \_\_\_\_\_ / DOC: \_\_\_\_\_ Cts: \_\_\_\_\_  
+ PBCJ: \_\_\_\_\_ Cts: \_\_\_\_\_ / DOC: \_\_\_\_\_ Cts: \_\_\_\_\_  
+ W/Credit for \_\_\_\_\_ Days / Mes. / Yrs.  Deft Remanded  Deft to remain on same rel. status pending sent.  
+ Conc / Consec / Co-Term w/cases / cts: \_\_\_\_\_  
+ Execution of Sentence Stayed  Sentence Suspended  Time served as to Cts \_\_\_\_\_  
+ Youthful Off  Habitual Off  Min / Mand: \_\_\_\_\_ as to Cts \_\_\_\_\_  
+ ABOVE SENTENCE TO BE FOLLOWED By:  Probation  Drug / Sex Off Prob  Comm. Control  I  II - See Pg. 2  
+ DRIVERS LICENSE TO BE SUSPENDED / REVOKED FOR \_\_\_\_\_ YEARS AS A RESULT OF THIS PLEA.
+
+DNA Swab
+
+\_\_\_\_\_ Set / Remains Set / Reset \_\_\_\_\_ Div \_\_\_\_\_ Rm \_\_\_\_\_ at \_\_\_\_\_ AM/PM  
+ \_\_\_\_\_ Set / Remains Set / Reset \_\_\_\_\_ Div \_\_\_\_\_ Rm \_\_\_\_\_ at \_\_\_\_\_ AM/PM  
+ Deft sign \_\_\_\_\_  
+ Def Co \_\_\_\_\_  ASA \_\_\_\_\_  Bondsman \_\_\_\_\_  
+ Prob  Jail  DJJ  GAL Notified by mail by: \_\_\_\_\_ on \_\_\_\_\_ / \_\_\_\_\_ / \_\_\_\_\_  
+ County Courthouse 205 N. Dixie, West Palm Beach  Courtroom, Criminal Justice Bldg.  Courtroom, Criminal Justice Complex  
+ 38544 State Road 80, Belle Glade 3228 Gun Club Rd., West Palm Beach
+
+IF YOU ARE A PERSON WITH A DISABILITY WHO NEEDS ANY ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS PROCEEDING, YOU ARE ENTITLED, AT NO COST TO YOU, TO THE PROVISION OF CERTAIN ASSISTANCE. PLEASE CONTACT MARY JAFFE, ADA COORDINATOR IN THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE COURT, PALM BEACH COUNTY COURTHOUSE, 205 N. DIXIE HWY, RM 52500, WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401; TELEPHONE (561) 355-4380, WITHIN 2 WORKING DAYS OF YOUR RECEIPT OF THIS NOTICE. IF YOU ARE HEARING OR VOICE IMPAIRED, CALL 1-800-955-8771.
+
+Case No.: 2006CF009361AXX W ST of FL vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN  
+Charges: PROCURE PERSON UNDER AGE OF 18 FOR PROSTITUTION  
+(ARIZES FROM 2006CF009454EXX)
+
+Arrest# Bond# Type \$ A/C
+
+Date Date Judge Crt. Rep. ASA DC Int Def. Co. Esq PD Pres / Not Pres.
+
+Before the Court for: St. Holloway Mark
+
+ Granted  Denied  With / Without Prejudice  Withdrawn  Court Reserves Ruling  Written Order to Follow
+
+ Warrant  Ordered  Recalled  Bond Set at \$ See Below  Also Covers  Sp Cond  
+ Bond Forf  OR: Disch / Revoked / Reinstated  Bond: Disch / Revoked  SOR: Disch / Revoked / Reinstated  
+ Bond Forf Vacated  Previous Bond Reinstated, if Bondsman agrees  State failed to file charges  Released O.R. / S.O.R.
+
+ Deft Indigent  PD Appt  Hrg only PD Pres Court Appts
+
+Evaluation for:  Drug Farm  DOC Non-Secure Bed by Pre-Plea  PSI ordered by/within days  w/input from DJJ / Staffing
+
+ Referred to: PTI / SAAP / PADD  Case placed on the absentee docket
+
+DEFT ENTERED A PLEA OF:  NOT GUILTY  GUILTY  NO CONTEST  BEST INTEREST  TO THE COURT  
+As Charged-Cts Lesser Cts Lesser Charge  
+ Sw & Test  Adv of Rts  Waived PSI Lesser Cts Lesser Charge
+
+ ADJ GUILTY as Charged as to Cts Lesser Cts
+
+ FOUND GUILTY as Charged as to Cts Lesser Cts
+
+ ADJ W/HELD as to Cts  SENT W/HELD as to Cts
+
+ FOUND AND ADJUDICATED DELINQUENT as to Cts  Dismiss  Nolle Prosse Cts
+
+Prob / Comm Control:  Revoked  Reinstated  Modified.  Term: Successfully / Unsuccessfully  
+ Deft. to pay fine or complete hrs. Community Service or Serve days PBCJ.
+
+ Stip/Found: (violent) Habitual Off. 775.084  Stip/Found: Sexual Offender / Sexual Predator  Stip/Found: P.R.R.  
+SENTENCE: PBCJ Cts: / DOC: Cts:  
+PBCJ: Cts: / DOC: Cts:
+
+ W/Credit for Days / Mos. / Yrs.  Deft to remain on same rel. status pending sent.  
+Conc / Consec Co-Term w/cases / cts: 400 / 000 / 000 / 000
+
+ Execution of Sentence Stayed  Sentence Suspended  Time served as to Cts
+
+ Youthful Off  Habitual Off  Min / Mand: as to Cts  
+ ABOVE SENTENCE TO BE FOLLOWED By:  Probation  Drug Off Prob  Comm. Control  I  II - See Page 2
+
+DUT SUMB
+
+Set / Remains Set / Reset Div Rm at AM/PM
+
+Set / Remains Set / Reset Div Rm at AM/PM
+
+ Deft sign  ASA  Bondsman
+
+ Def Co  ASA  Bondsman  
+ Prob  Jail  DJJ.  GAL Notified by mail by: on / / /
+
+ County Courthouse  Courtroom, Criminal Justice Bldg.  Courtroom, Criminal Justice Complex  
+205 N. Dixie, West Palm Beach 38844 State Road 80, Belle Glade 3228 Gun Club Rd., West Palm Beach
+
+IF YOU ARE A PERSON WITH A DISABILITY WHO NEEDS ANY ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS PROCEEDING, YOU ARE ENTITLED, AT NO COST TO YOU, TO THE PROVISION OF CERTAIN ASSISTANCE. PLEASE CONTACT ROBIN SHEPPETT, ADA COORDINATOR IN THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE COURT, PALM BEACH COUNTY COURTHOUSE, 205 N. DIXIE HWY, RM 5.2500, WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401; TELEPHONE (561) 355-4386, WITHIN 2 WORKING DAYS OF YOUR RECEIPT OF THIS NOTICE. IF YOU ARE HEARING OR VOICE IMPAIRED, CALL 1-800-955-8771.
+
+CASE NO. 2006087931 HY
+
+NAME: Te Broy Epstein
+
+TERM OF Prob / Sex Off / Drug Off Prob / C.C. I C.C. II: 12 mos yrs as to Cts.
+
+ conc w/  consec. w/ \_\_\_\_\_
+
+ Probation transferred to:
+
+SPECIAL CONDITIONS:
+
+- Complete Originally Ordered Conditions
+- Curfew: \_\_\_\_\_ p.m., with the following exception: \_\_\_\_\_
+- Deft. to report to Prob. Dept. immediately upon release
+- Deft. not to have in care, custody, or control any unlawful or illegal material, subst., device, or object.
+- Deft. to immediately notify Prob. Officer if place of residence or job changes.
+- Restitution CRO filed
+- Subject to all ordinary and special conditions of Probation
+
+ Substance Abuse Eval. / Psychological Eval. / Psychosexual Eval. within / by: \_\_\_\_\_  
+and deft. to successfully complete recommended treatment
+
+- Random Drug/Alcohol Testing  At Deft's Expense  Costs Waived
+- No Consumption/Possession of Alcohol or Drugs or Intoxicants without a Prescription.
+- Attend \_\_\_\_\_ AA and/or NA Meetings per Week.
+- Deft. not to frequent any place of business whose primary purpose is the sale of alcohol.
+
+ Complete \_\_\_\_\_ Hrs. of Community Service to be done at the rate of \_\_\_\_\_ Hrs. per Wk / Mo.(Min.)
+
+ License Revoked / Suspended for \_\_\_\_\_ mos / yrs
+
+ Attend and successfully complete DUI school and 1 session of Victim Impact Panel  
+ No Contact / No Violent Contact / No Direct or Indirect contact w/Victim(s) or others listed:
+
+ No Contact w/Minor Children w/o Adult Supervision aware of this case and the disposition.
+
+ Cost of Supervision: \$ \_\_\_\_\_ per month  Waived by Court. \_\_\_\_\_
+
+ Enter and Successfully Complete DOC Non-Secure Bed Program and Any Recommended Aftercare.
+
+ Hold in Custody, release only to DOC Non-Secure Bed Program Officer.
+
+ Enter and Successfully Complete PBSO Long / Short Track Drug Farm and Any Rec. Aftercare.
+
+ Forfeit Weapon / Money seized at the time of arrest to:
+
+ Enter and Complete:  Anger Management Program  Batterers Intervention Program  
+ Theft Abatement Program: \_\_\_\_\_  Other: \_\_\_\_\_
+
+ Defendant may apply for Early Termination after \_\_\_\_\_, provided all conds. are satisfied.
+
+ Serve \_\_\_\_\_ days / months in PBCJ, with credit for \_\_\_\_\_ days / months.
+
+ See all attached documents
+
+ Deft. must hold an ASA Secure Offender
+
+ w/+N 48 hours of Pre/Pose
+
+ \_\_\_\_\_
+
+ \_\_\_\_\_
+
+ \_\_\_\_\_
+
+ \_\_\_\_\_
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739272/EFTA02739272.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739272/EFTA02739272.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..737085b53211cee032ac3e7ff9d0bdc4160c2b25
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739272/EFTA02739272.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,199 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739272.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 4,
+  "chars": 9070,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 16.11,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "EXHIBIT A",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            203.565,
+            330.48
+          ],
+          [
+            405.43341064453125,
+            330.48
+          ],
+          [
+            405.43341064453125,
+            369.18365478515625
+          ],
+          [
+            203.565,
+            369.18365478515625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "SPECIAL CONDITIONS:",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            39.975,
+            133.65
+          ],
+          [
+            169.12500000000003,
+            133.65
+          ],
+          [
+            169.12500000000003,
+            149.85000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            39.975,
+            149.85000000000002
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "Form",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            64
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            37
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739272"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739276/EFTA02739276.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739276/EFTA02739276.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f44bd5268e4e9fb2eb970e9e3160ef0bbc5ea3c2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739276/EFTA02739276.md
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## DEFENDANT'S NOTICE CONCERNING MOTION TO STAY f DE 81
+
+In connection with his motion to stay this action [DE 8], Defendant Jeffrey Epstein hereby notifies the Court that the State Court action, State of Florida v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 2006 CF 09454 AXX (Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County), was resolved on June 30, 2008. See Final Disposition sheets, attached hereto as Exhibit A. The federal criminal proceeding, however, remains pending.
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER & WEISS, P.A.
+
+250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Tel: 561 659 8300 Fax: 561 835 8691
+
+By: /s/ Jack A. Goldberger
+
+Jack A. Goldberger
+
+Ha. Bar No. 262013
+
+jgoldberger@ agwpa.com
+
+Attorneys for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
+
+## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
+
+I HEREBY CERTIFY that on July 1, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on counsel of record identified below by facsimile and U.S. Mail.
+
+Jeffrey M. Herman, Esq. Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Herman & Mermelstein, P.A. 18205 Biscayne Blvd, Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160 Fax: 305 931 0877
+
+> /s/ Jack A. Goldberger Jack A. Goldberger
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739276/EFTA02739276.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739276/EFTA02739276.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4774441e571990d1205be5e7425ccc592b86569e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739276/EFTA02739276.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,204 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739276.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 3,
+  "chars": 1424,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 0.81,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            184.82399999999998,
+            87.48
+          ],
+          [
+            417.3464050292969,
+            87.48
+          ],
+          [
+            417.3464050292969,
+            120.88092041015625
+          ],
+          [
+            184.82399999999998,
+            120.88092041015625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "DEFENDANT'S NOTICE CONCERNING MOTION TO STAY f DE 81",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            88.74,
+            353.15999999999997
+          ],
+          [
+            525.9515991210938,
+            353.15999999999997
+          ],
+          [
+            525.9515991210938,
+            370.2509460449219
+          ],
+          [
+            88.74,
+            370.2509460449219
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            212.97599999999997,
+            72.77532958984375
+          ],
+          [
+            405.20263671875,
+            72.77532958984375
+          ],
+          [
+            405.20263671875,
+            88.62091064453125
+          ],
+          [
+            212.97599999999997,
+            88.62091064453125
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            47
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            24
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            11
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            16
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            33
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            17
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739276"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739279/EFTA02739279.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739279/EFTA02739279.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5b6a93082796c2745731645f386c74dfad7d12b9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739279/EFTA02739279.md
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA-~
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+/
+
+## NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS CO-COUNSEL
+
+NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the law firm of Tein, P.L. enters its appearance as co-counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein in these proceedings.
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+TEIN, P.L. 3059 Grand Avenue, Suite 340 Coconut Grove, Florida 33133 Tel: 305 442 1101 Fax: 305 442 6744
+
+By: /s/ Michael R. Tein GUY A. Fla. Bar No. 623740 MICHAEL R. TEIN Ha. Bar No. 993522 tein@lewistein.com
+
+## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
+
+I HEREBY CERTIFY that on July 8, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record identified on the following service list via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF.
+
+> /s/ Michael R. Tein Michael R. Tein
+
+## SERVICE LIST
+
+Jeffrey M. Herman, Esq. Stuart S. Mame!stein. Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Herman & Mennelstein, P.A. 18205 Biscayne Blvd, Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160 Fax: 305 931 0877
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739279/EFTA02739279.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739279/EFTA02739279.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a80d9891539f5f486025c3cb8b43552320952091
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739279/EFTA02739279.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,231 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739279.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 3,
+  "chars": 1166,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 0.76,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            200.73600000000002,
+            86.67
+          ],
+          [
+            400.31707763671875,
+            86.67
+          ],
+          [
+            400.31707763671875,
+            116.2330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            200.73600000000002,
+            116.2330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AS CO-COUNSEL",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            176.25599999999997,
+            319.95000000000005
+          ],
+          [
+            436.06396484375,
+            319.95000000000005
+          ],
+          [
+            436.06396484375,
+            335.9830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            176.25599999999997,
+            335.9830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            222.768,
+            70.47
+          ],
+          [
+            388.5423889160156,
+            70.47
+          ],
+          [
+            388.5423889160156,
+            86.2330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            222.768,
+            86.2330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "SERVICE LIST",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            260.712,
+            69.66
+          ],
+          [
+            351.1127014160156,
+            69.66
+          ],
+          [
+            351.1127014160156,
+            85.447021484375
+          ],
+          [
+            260.712,
+            85.447021484375
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            11
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            17
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            9
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            19
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739279"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739282/EFTA02739282.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739282/EFTA02739282.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c24f29d410429c247c6e32221674bace09723f43
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739282/EFTA02739282.md
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRAi
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR STAY
+
+## JPROPOSED1 ORDER
+
+Upon Plaintiff's Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Defendant's Motion for Stay, and good cause being shown it is hereby
+
+ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion is granted. Plaintiff shall have an enlargement of time of twenty (20) days, until July 30, 2008, to respond to Defendant's Motion for Stay.
+
+DONE AND ORDERED in in Ft. Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida, this day of 2008.
+
+DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739282/EFTA02739282.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739282/EFTA02739282.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2404f3368ebcfa730932e0c2a48cc27beade76d6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739282/EFTA02739282.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739282.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 1,
+  "chars": 674,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 0.69,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            405.95098876953125,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            405.95098876953125,
+            115.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            115.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME \nTO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR STAY",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            148.10399999999998,
+            295.65
+          ],
+          [
+            464.7416076660156,
+            295.65
+          ],
+          [
+            464.7416076660156,
+            325.10302734375
+          ],
+          [
+            148.10399999999998,
+            325.10302734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "JPROPOSED1 ORDER",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            261.936,
+            337.77
+          ],
+          [
+            387.05316162109375,
+            337.77
+          ],
+          [
+            387.05316162109375,
+            353.2330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            261.936,
+            353.2330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            42
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            21
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            9
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739282"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739283/EFTA02739283.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739283/EFTA02739283.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f8a78f8e6bf729cbe8554340aa7ca79a4a85d808
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739283/EFTA02739283.md
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR STAY
+
+Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 3, by and through undersigned counsel, files this Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Defendant's Motion for Stay, and states as follows:
+
+- 1. Defendant filed his Motion for Stay on June 20, 2008. Plaintiffs response is due on or before July 10, 2008.
+- 2. Defendant's Motion for Stay is based upon the existence of purported parallel criminal actions, and is grounded in section 3509(k) of Title 18, United States Code.
+- 3. Subsequent to filing his Motion for Stay on July 1, 2008, Defendant Epstein filed a Notice advising this Court that the State Court criminal action against the Defendant was resolved, but that the federal criminal proceeding remained pending. It is Plaintiff's counsel's understanding from press reports, however, that the federal criminal proceeding will be resolved in the same plea deal, which would make the Defendant's Motion for Stay moot.'
+- 4. Therefore, Plaintiff respectfully requests a brief enlargement of time of twenty (20 days) within which to file a memorandum in opposition to Defendant's Motion for Stay. This
+
+request for enlargement of time is in the interest of judicial economy and efficiency.
+
+- 5. Additionally, Plaintiffs counsel requests this enlargement of time due to the demands on their time in other cases and matters.
+- 6. Prior to filing this Motion, Plaintiffs counsel, Adam Horowitz, attempted to confer with defense counsel, to no avail.
+
+WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully request that this Court enter an order enlarging by twenty (20) days the time within which the Plaintiff may respond to the Defendant's Motion for Stay, until July 30, 2008.
+
+Dated: July 10, 2008. Respectfully submitted,
+
+By: s/ Adam D. Horowitz Jeffrey M. Herman (FL Bar No. 521647) jherman@hermanlaw.com Stuart S. Mermelstein (FL Bar No. 947245) ssm@hermanlaw.com Adam D. Horowitz (FL Bar No. 376980) ahorowitz@ hermanlaw.com HERMAN & MERMELSTEIN, P.A. Attorneys for PlaintifsJane Doe 18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160 Tel: 305-931-2200 Fax: 305-931-0877
+
+<sup>&#</sup>x27; Plaintiff opposes the Motion for Stay on its merits under 18 U.S.C. §3509(k).
+
+## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
+
+I hereby certify that on July 10, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing document w. ith the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day to all parties on the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those parties who are not authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing.
+
+Is/ Adam D. Horowitz
+
+## SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA/ffi United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger jagesq@bcllsouth.nct
+
+Michael R. Tein tein@lewistein.com
+
+/s/ Adam D. Horowitz
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739283/EFTA02739283.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739283/EFTA02739283.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..832a7c3a55888a2c701603614dd8ae0b195f8f73
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739283/EFTA02739283.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739283.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 4,
+  "chars": 3143,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 0.76,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            405.95098876953125,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            405.95098876953125,
+            115.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            115.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME \nTO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR STAY",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            148.10399999999998,
+            295.65
+          ],
+          [
+            464.7416076660156,
+            295.65
+          ],
+          [
+            464.7416076660156,
+            325.10302734375
+          ],
+          [
+            148.10399999999998,
+            325.10302734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            227.052,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            385.0019836425781,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            385.0019836425781,
+            100.863037109375
+          ],
+          [
+            227.052,
+            100.863037109375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "SERVICE LIST \nDOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN \nCASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA/ffi \nUnited States District Court, Southern District of Florida",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            157.28400000000002,
+            84.24
+          ],
+          [
+            455.1346740722656,
+            84.24
+          ],
+          [
+            455.1346740722656,
+            143.68353271484375
+          ],
+          [
+            157.28400000000002,
+            143.68353271484375
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            22
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739283"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739287/EFTA02739287.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739287/EFTA02739287.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ad10e0c07d3107f46a6f894d8c3f6ea78cba7267
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739287/EFTA02739287.md
@@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
+**U.S. District Court  
+Southern District of Florida (West Palm Beach)  
+CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 9:08-cv-80232-KAM  
+*Internal Use Only***
+
+Doe No. 3 v. Epstein  
+Assigned to: Judge Kenneth A. Marra  
+Case: 9:08-cv-80119-KAM  
+Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
+
+Date Filed: 03/05/2008  
+Jury Demand: Plaintiff  
+Nature of Suit: 360 P.I.: Other  
+Jurisdiction: Diversity
+
+**Plaintiff**
+
+**Jane Doe No. 3**
+
+represented by **Adam D. Horowitz**  
+Herman & Mermelstein, P.A.  
+18205 Biscayne Blvd.  
+Suite 2218  
+Miami, FL 33160  
+305-931-2200  
+Fax: 305-931-0877  
+Email: ahorowitz@hermanlaw.com  
+*LEAD ATTORNEY*  
+*ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED*
+
+**Jeffrey Marc Herman**  
+Herman & Mermelstein  
+18205 Biscayne Boulevard  
+Suite 2218  
+Miami, FL 33160  
+305-931-2200  
+Fax: 931-0877  
+Email: jherman@hermanlaw.com  
+*LEAD ATTORNEY*  
+*ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED*
+
+**Stuart S. Mermelstein**  
+Herman & Mermelstein  
+18205 Biscayne Boulevard  
+Suite 2218  
+Miami, FL 33160  
+305-931-2200  
+Fax: 931-0877  
+Email: lrivera@hermanlaw.com  
+*LEAD ATTORNEY*  
+*ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED*
+
+V.
+
+**Defendant**
+
+**Jeffrey Epstein**
+
+represented by **Jack Alan Goldberger**  
+Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.  
+250 Australian Avenue South  
+Suite 1400  
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012  
+561-659-8300  
+Fax: 835-8691  
+Email: jagesq@bellsouth.net  
+*ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED*
+
+**Michael [REDACTED] Tein**  
+[REDACTED] Tein  
+3059 Grand Avenue  
+Suite 340
+
+Coconut Grove, FL 33133 305-442-1101 Fax: 442-6744 Email: tein@lewistein.com ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
+
+| Date Filed  | #   | Docket Text                                                                     |
+|-------------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| 03/05/2008  | 1   | COMPLAINT against Jeffrey Epstein. Filing fee \$350. Receipt No. 542467,        |
+| 03/05/2008  | 2   | Summons Issued as to Jeffrey Epstein. (caw) (Entered: 03/05/2008)               |
+| 03/11/2008  | 1   | ORDER requiring counsel to confer, file joint scheduling report and file joint  |
+| 05/22/2008  | 4   | AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Jeffrey Epstein        |
+| 05/29/2008  | 1   | Plaintiffs MOTION for Entry of Default by Clerk Against Defendant by Jane       |
+| 06/13/2008  | 6   | NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jack Alan Goldberger on behalf of Jeffrey      |
+| 06/13/2008  | 2   | RESPONSE to Motion rej Plaintiffs MOTION for Entry of Default by Clerk          |
+|             |     | Against Defendant Jane Doe No. 3 filed by Jeffrey Epstein. Replies due by       |
+| 06/20/2008  | A   | Defendant's MOTION to Stay by Jeffrey Epstein. Responses due by 7/10/2008       |
+| 06/20/2008  | 2   | Defendant's MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer Or Otherwise            |
+|             |     | Respond To Complaint by Jeffrey Epstein. (Goldberger. Jack) (Entered:           |
+| 06/24/2008  | JD  | MEMORANDUM in Support rej. Plaintiffs MOTION for Entry of Default by            |
+|             |     | Clerk Against Defendant filed by Jane Doe No. 3. (Herman, Jeffrey) (Entered:    |
+| 07/01/2008  | 11, | NOTICE by Jeffrey Epstein Concerning Motion To Stay IDE 81 (Attachments: #      |
+| 07/08/2008  | 12  | NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Michael Tein on behalf of Jeffrey              |
+| 07/10/2008  |     | 11 Plaintiffs MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as toja Defendant's |
+| 07/10/2008  | 14  | Sealed Document. (yc) (Entered: 07/10/2008)                                     |
+| 07/10/2008  | 15  | Sealed Document. (yc) (Entered: 07/10/2008)                                     |
+| 07/16/2008  | 1St | ORDER denying motion to file Ex Parte and Under Seal. The clerk shall unseal    |
+| 07/ I6/2008 |     | 11 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE why default should not be entered against                |
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739287/EFTA02739287.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739287/EFTA02739287.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9a1448a1a893e8a66efd06609fe76befc2477595
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739287/EFTA02739287.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,162 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739287.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 2,
+  "chars": 3824,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 5.83,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "U.S. District Court Southern District of Florida (West Palm Beach) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 9:08-cv-80232-KAM Internal Use Only",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            154.7,
+            49.41
+          ],
+          [
+            474.21500000000003,
+            49.41
+          ],
+          [
+            474.21500000000003,
+            105.30000000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            154.7,
+            105.30000000000001
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Plaintiff",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            70.21,
+            175.76999999999998
+          ],
+          [
+            113.05000000000001,
+            175.76999999999998
+          ],
+          [
+            113.05000000000001,
+            187.92000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            70.21,
+            187.92000000000002
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Defendant",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            70.21,
+            583.2
+          ],
+          [
+            123.16499999999998,
+            583.2
+          ],
+          [
+            123.16499999999998,
+            595.3499999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            70.21,
+            595.3499999999999
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            20
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            115
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            50
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Table",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739287"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739289/EFTA02739289.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739289/EFTA02739289.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..47e4c797a1a5f856804d10d460a573c20b59f1aa
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739289/EFTA02739289.md
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+NO. V-MARRA/
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+v.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SEAL
+
+THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to File Ex Parte and Under Seal, filed July 10, 2008. Defendant seeks to file a Notice of Continued Pendency of Federal Criminal Action under seal.' The Court has carefully considered the motion and the record and is otherwise fully advised in the premises.
+
+As stated in the Local Rules for the Southern District of Florida, "proceedings in the United States District Court are public and Court filings are matters of public record." S.D. Fla. L.R. 5.4(A). It is well settled that the media and the public in general possess a common-law right to inspect and copy judicial records. See Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 (1978). "The right to inspect and copy records is not absolute, however. As with other forms of access, it may interfere with the administration of justice and hence may have to be curtailed." v. Graddick, 696 F.2d 796, 803 (11th Cir.1983). This right of access creates
+
+<sup>&#</sup>x27;All documents filed conventionally shall henceforth be filed directly with the Office of the Clerk in West Palm Beach, Florida. The parties shall not file documents conventionally in any other division of the Southern District of Florida.
+
+a presumption in favor of openness of court records, which "must be balanced against any competing interest advanced." United States v. Noriega, 752 F. Supp. 1037, 1040 (S.D. Fla.1990). For example, courts may look to see whether the records sought are for illegitimate purposes. 696 F.2d at 803. Likewise, the Court may consider whether "the press has already been permitted substantial access to the contents of the records." Id.
+
+In his motion to seal, Defendant has made no argument as to why his Notice of Continued Pendency of Federal Criminal Action should not be made available to the public. Defendant states only that he wishes ItIo avoid disclosure of confidential material." (Def. Mot. 2.) The Court finds this justification insufficient to justify keeping this document (filed ex parte) under seal. The Court is supported in this conclusion by its decision in a similar case, In re: Jane Doe, No. 08-80736-C1V (S.D. Fla. July I1, 2008), in which the Court unsealed, over the objection of the United States Attorney, documents containing similar information regarding Defendant's criminal plea agreement. Thus, any argument regarding confidentiality is vitiated by the fact that information regarding Defendant's criminal plea arrangement is already a matter of public record. See, e.g., Sally Apgar, Victims Object to Palm Beach Billionaire's Plea Deal in Underage Sex Case, S. Fla. Sun-Sentinel, July 12, 2008. Similarly, Defendant has not justified the necessity of filing his Notice ex parte. As such, Defendant's Motion to Seal shall be denied.
+
+Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendant's Motion to File Ex Pare and Under Seal is DENIED. The Clerk shall UNSEAL docket entries 14 and 15 and make them available for public inspection through CM/ECF at the earliest possible time. Defendant is further ORDERED to serve a copy of his Notice on Plaintiff within five (5) days of the date of
+
+entry of this Order.
+
+DONE AND ORDERED in at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County,
+
+Florida, this 16ih day of July, 2008.
+
+Copies furnished to: all counsel of record KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739289/EFTA02739289.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739289/EFTA02739289.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..393fdab53a181fd86d252e29d416c8828ca1b494
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739289/EFTA02739289.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,181 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739289.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 3,
+  "chars": 3542,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 0.87,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            206.856,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            405.5581359863281,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            405.5581359863281,
+            100.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            206.856,
+            100.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SEAL",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            197.06400000000002,
+            298.08
+          ],
+          [
+            415.5150451660156,
+            298.08
+          ],
+          [
+            415.5150451660156,
+            313.18353271484375
+          ],
+          [
+            197.06400000000002,
+            313.18353271484375
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            57
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            60
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            24
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            23
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            11
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739289"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739292/EFTA02739292.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739292/EFTA02739292.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4800f562df31d4adb17fa97c211b7f2409a52696
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739292/EFTA02739292.md
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
+### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+NO. 08-80232-CIV-MARRa
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+v.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+### ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DEFAULT SHOULD NOT BE ENTERED AGAINST DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN
+
+THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on Plaintiff S Motion for Entry of Default by Clerk (DE 5), filed May 29, 2008. The motion is now fully briefed and is ripe for review. The Court has carefully considered the motion and is otherwise fully advised in the premises.
+
+# Background
+
+On March 5, 2008, Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 3 ("Plaintiff') filed the instant action against Jeffrey Epstein ("Defendant"), alleging claims of sexual assault and intentional infliction of emotional distress. (DE 1.) Plaintiffs process server attempted to deliver a copy of the summons and complaint to Defendant personally on April 23, April 24, and May I, 2008, at his residence in New York City. (DE 4.) None of these attempts were successful. On May 7, 2008, the process server left a copy of the summons and complaint with "'John =' Assistant & House Staff Employee who refused true name." (DE 4.) The process server also mailed a copy of the summons and complaint to Defendant on May 5, 2008, via first class mail. (DE 4.) The
+
+envelope was marked "personal and confidential" and did not indicate that the envelope was from an attorney or related to a legal action. (DE 4.)
+
+# Discussion
+
+Rule 4(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure states that an individual may be served by "following state law for serving a summons in an action brought in courts of general jurisdiction in the state where the district court is located or where service is made." Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(e)(I). Alternatively, service may be made by leaving a copy of the summons and complaint at the individual's place of abode "with someone of suitable age and discretion who resides there." Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(e)(2)(B).
+
+Plaintiff claims that service in this case is valid pursuant to either Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(eX2XB) or Florida law. Like the Federal Rules, Florida law requires that process be left at the individual's usual place of abode "with any person residing therein who is 15 years of age or older." Fla. Stat. § 48.031(1)(a). The affidavit of service (DE 4) states that the summons and complaint were left with "John at Defendant's usual place of abode. From this declaration, the Court cannot determine whether "John resides at the Manhattan apartment. Further, Defendant has submitted the affidavit of Richard Barnett, who avers that he received copies of the summons and complaint on May 7, 2008, from the process server. (DE 9 Ex. A.) Because Plaintiff has provided no indication to suggest that "John M' resides at the apartment, the Court concludes that Plaintiff did not effect valid service on Defendant under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(eX2XB) or Fla. Stat. § 48.031(1)(a).
+
+The Court does not believe that Plaintiff's request for discovery on the issue of service is necessary, because service of process was made pursuant to New York law. Under New York
+
+law, personal service may be made on an individual by
+
+delivering the summons within the state to a person of suitable age and discretion at the actual place of business, dwelling place or usual place of abode of the person to be served and by either mailing the summons to the person to be served at his or her last known residence or by mailing the summons by first class mail to the person to be served at his or her actual place of business in an envelope bearing the legend "personal and confidential" and not indicating on the outside thereof, by return address or otherwise, that the communication is from an attorney or concerns an action against the person to be served, such delivery and mailing to be effected within twenty days of each other.
+
+N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 308(2) (McKinney 2008) (emphasis added). New York law does not require the person receiving the summons and complaint at the individual's place of abode to reside at that location. See, e.g., Boston Safe Deposit and Tryst Co. v. Morse, 779 F. Supp. 347, 350 (S.D.N.Y. 1991); Al Fayed v. Barak, 833 N.Y.S. 2d 500, 501 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007).
+
+In this case, the affidavit of service states that "John was a person of suitable age and discretion who accepted a copy of the summons and complaint at Defendant's actual apartment. (DE 4.) Thus, under New York law, delivery of the summons and complaint to "John was appropriate. Because the summons and complaint were mailed to Defendant and delivered to his residence within twenty days of each other, Plaintiff took all necessary steps to serve Defendant under New York law.
+
+As Defendant recognizes, New York law also requires that proof of service be "filed with the clerk of the court designated in the summons within twenty days of either such delivery or mailing, whichever is effected later." N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 308(2). Here, Plaintiff is in compliance with this requirement as well: delivery was made on May 7, 2008, and proof of service was filed with the Clerk of the Court on May 22, 2008. (DE 4.) Thus, service was deemed complete as of June 2, 2008, under New York law. See N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 308(2) (stating "service shall be complete ten days after" filing of proof of service).
+
+Nevertheless, Defendant's analysis is not entirely correct. In calculating when Defendant's response was due, the Court turns to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a), which states that a defendant must serve an answer within twenty days of being served with the summons and complaint. Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(aX I XAXi). Under this rule, Defendant was required to respond to the Complaint within twenty days from the receipt of the summons; the rule does not suggest a longer period of time is available when substituted service is used to serve a defendant. While Rule 4(e)(1) allows Plaintiff to serve process on Defendant in the method permitted by New York, Rule 4(e)(I) does not alter the twenty day period specified by Rule 12(a). In other words, under Rules 4(e)(1) and 12(a), the Court is not bound by New York's proof of service filing requirement nor New York's "completion" date in determining when Defendant's answer needed to be filed. Beller & v. Tyler, 120 F.3d 21, 25-26 (2d Cir. 1997) (reconciling the deadlines imposed by Rule 12(a) and N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 308). Instead, once Defendant received a copy of the summons and complaint, Defendant had twenty days to respond. Id. ("[A] defendant has twenty days from the receipt of the summons to file an answer .... This is so even if ... the defendant is served pursuant to a state law method of service and the state law provides a longer time in which to answer."). Thus, Defendant's response was due on May 27, 2007.1
+
+<sup>&#</sup>x27;In Tyler, the court acknowledged that, because service was made in part by mail, the defendant may have the benefit of three extra days to respond per Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(e). Tyler, 120 F.3d at 26. In this case, Plaintiff's server mailed the summons and complaint on May 5, 2008. Thus, under this scheme, Defendant would have had until May 28, 2008, to respond. Either way, Defendant failed to appear int his case until June 13, 2008.
+
+### Conclusion
+
+Accordingly, Defendant is hereby ORDERED to file a report with the Court showing good cause why default should not be entered for failure to respond to the Complaint in a timely manner within ten (10) days from the date of entry of this Order. Plaintiff may respond to Defendant's report within the time allotted by the Local Rules. Failure to respond to this Order shall result in an entry of default against Defendant.
+
+DONE AND ORDERED in at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 16"' day of July, 2008.
+
+> KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge
+
+Copies furnished to: all counsel of record
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739292/EFTA02739292.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739292/EFTA02739292.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..496339f90bf8afc408b1b8780c2fb81a85a3394d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739292/EFTA02739292.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,326 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739292.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 5,
+  "chars": 7806,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.19,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            206.856,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            405.5581359863281,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            405.5581359863281,
+            100.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            206.856,
+            100.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DEFAULT SHOULD NOT BE ENTERED \nAGAINST DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            101.59200000000001,
+            298.08
+          ],
+          [
+            511.34710693359375,
+            298.08
+          ],
+          [
+            511.34710693359375,
+            327.363037109375
+          ],
+          [
+            101.59200000000001,
+            327.363037109375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Background",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            69.156,
+            425.25
+          ],
+          [
+            138.34512329101562,
+            425.25
+          ],
+          [
+            138.34512329101562,
+            440.60302734375
+          ],
+          [
+            69.156,
+            440.60302734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Discussion",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            69.156,
+            127.98000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            128.8201904296875,
+            127.98000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            128.8201904296875,
+            143.2330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            69.156,
+            143.2330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Conclusion",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            68.544,
+            72.08999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            131.8949737548828,
+            72.08999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            131.8949737548828,
+            86.60302734375
+          ],
+          [
+            68.544,
+            86.60302734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            49
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            49
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            67
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            29
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            31
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            15
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739292"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739297/EFTA02739297.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739297/EFTA02739297.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5b02d47ed4d7d4d7fbdaa78b3743ca929962462f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739297/EFTA02739297.md
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT  
+SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA-
+
+![](_page_0_Picture_67.jpeg)
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+\_\_\_\_\_/
+
+FILED BY  
+08 JUL 0 PM 12: 23  
+STEVEN H. LARINDRE  
+S. D. OFF. FLA. Z. HIA
+
+**FILED EX PARTE  
+UNDER SEAL**
+
+**DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO FILE EX PARTE AND UNDER SEAL**
+
+![]()Pursuant to S.D. Fla. L.R. 5.4, defendant Jeffrey Epstein hereby moves to file his Notice of Continued Pendency of Federal Criminal Action, as well as this motion, ex parte and under seal, stating as follows:
+
+- 1. In support of his motion to stay [DE 8], defendant has herewith filed a Notice of Continued Pendency of Federal Criminal Action.
+- 2. The Notice relates to a confidential agreement between the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida and the defendant.
+- 3. The information contained in the Notice is material to this Court's consideration of Epstein's motion to stay.
+- 4. To avoid disclosure of confidential material, Epstein requests leave to file the Notice, and this motion, ex parte and under seal.
+- 5. Pending a ruling from this Court, Epstein has not served this motion or the Notice on counsel for plaintiff.
+
+WHEREFORE, defendant Jeffrey Epstein respectfully requests leave to file this motion and his Notice of Continued Pendency of Federal Criminal Action, ex parte and under seal.
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+TEIN, P.L. 3059 Grand Avenue, Suite 340 Coconut Grove, Florida 33133 Tel: 305 442 1101 Fax: 305 442 6744
+
+By: GUY A. Fla. Bar No. 623740 MICHAEL R. TEIN Fla. Bar No. 993522 tein@lewistein.com
+
+ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER & WEISS, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Tel. 561 659 8300 Fax. 561 835 8691
+
+By: JACK A. GOLDBERGER Fla. Bar No. 262013 jgoldberger@agwpa.com
+
+Attorneys for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
+
+**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE**
+
+I HEREBY CERTIFY that this motion, in accordance with S.D. Fla. L.R. 5.4, has not been served on opposing counsel and was filed under seal on July 10, 2008.
+
+![]()\_\_\_\_\_  
+Michael R. Tein
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739297/EFTA02739297.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739297/EFTA02739297.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5df946091ac29b1bd616678dbbc5c0f13dea3890
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739297/EFTA02739297.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,233 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739297.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 4,
+  "chars": 2096,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 3.5,
+  "image_assets": [
+    "_page_0_Picture_67.jpeg"
+  ],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            180.195,
+            67.23
+          ],
+          [
+            412.04999999999995,
+            67.23
+          ],
+          [
+            412.04999999999995,
+            98.82
+          ],
+          [
+            180.195,
+            98.82
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            197.41500000000002,
+            69.66
+          ],
+          [
+            402.21,
+            69.66
+          ],
+          [
+            402.21,
+            86.67
+          ],
+          [
+            197.41500000000002,
+            86.67
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            33
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            22
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            16
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "Picture",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            31
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            16
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            49
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            21
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "Caption",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739297"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739297/_page_0_Picture_67.jpeg b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739297/_page_0_Picture_67.jpeg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8e8b91284cb41bea80025a6ee6295330398217f8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739297/_page_0_Picture_67.jpeg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:7fb908cddbc1606fd70c117abdb7750762bbe08796b068bd82721b840dd630f5
+size 1193
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739301/EFTA02739301.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739301/EFTA02739301.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..238fda1561d0c78efa4bd82db88b4d9403713a86
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739301/EFTA02739301.md
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT  
+SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA-
+
+![](_page_0_Picture_50.jpeg)
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+\_\_\_\_\_/
+
+![](_page_0_Picture_57.jpeg)
+
+**FILED EX PARTE  
+UNDER SEAL**
+
+*150*
+
+## NOTICE OF CONTINUED PENDENCY OF FEDERAL CRIMINAL ACTION
+
+Defendant Jeffrey Epstein hereby notifies the Court of the continued pendency of a federal criminal action against him, stating as follows:
+
+On June 30, 2008, after defendant Jeffrey Epstein filed his motion to stay [DE 8], he was sentenced in the state-court criminal case described in that motion (State of Florida v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 2006 CF 09454 AXX, Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County) (the "Florida Criminal Action"). As explained below, the parallel federal criminal action against him described in that motion (In re Grand Juty, No. FGJ 07-103(WPB), United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida) (the "Federal Criminal Action"), remains pending.
+
+On September 24, 2007, the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("USAO"), represented by Assistant United States Attorney Ann C. Villafana, Esq., and Mr. Epstein, entered into a deferredprosecution agreement ("Agreement"), which the parties agreed to keep confidential. Prior to entering into that Agreement, Ms. Villafana advised that she had already prepared a federal criminal indictment against Mr. Epstein in the Federal Criminal Action.
+
+Under the Agreement, beginning on the date Mr. Epstein began serving his sentence in the Florida Criminal Action, the USAO agreed to suspend its grand jury investigation in the Federal Criminal Action. The USAO, however, retains the
+
+right to reactivate the grand jury and indict Mr. Epstein should he breach any part of the Agreement during its term, which runs for 33 months, beginning on the date Mr. Epstein began serving his sentence in the Florida Criminal Action. Accordingly, the Federal Criminal Action will remain pending against Mr. Epstein for 33 months from June 30, 2008.
+
+Mr. Epstein will provide the Court with a copy of the confidential Agreement for its in-camera inspection at the Court's request.
+
+WHEREFORE, Defendant Jeffrey Epstein hereby notifies the Court of the continued pendency of the Federal Criminal Action.
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+TEIN, P.L. 3059 Grand Avenue, Suite 340 Coconut Grove, Florida 33133 Tel: 305 442 1101 Fax: 305 442 6744
+
+By:
+
+GUY A. Fla. Bar No. 623740
+
+MICHAEL R. TEIN Fla. Bar No. 993522 tein@lewistein.com
+
+ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER & WEISS, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Tel. 561 659 8300 Fax. 561 835 8691
+
+By: Jack A. Goldberger Fla. Bar No. 262013 jgoldberger@agwpa.com
+
+Attorneys for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
+
+## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
+
+I HEREBY CERTIFY that this motion, in accordance with S.D. Fla. L.R. 5.4, has not been served on opposing counsel and was filed under seal on July 10, 2008.
+
+ituzitea;
+
+Michael R. Tein
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739301/EFTA02739301.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739301/EFTA02739301.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7a3164259e4d029bfb64261c2b11a62c2a3fce90
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739301/EFTA02739301.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,253 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739301.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 4,
+  "chars": 3023,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 2.78,
+  "image_assets": [
+    "_page_0_Picture_50.jpeg",
+    "_page_0_Picture_57.jpeg"
+  ],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            180.195,
+            69.66
+          ],
+          [
+            412.04999999999995,
+            69.66
+          ],
+          [
+            412.04999999999995,
+            101.25
+          ],
+          [
+            180.195,
+            101.25
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "NOTICE OF CONTINUED PENDENCY \nOF FEDERAL CRIMINAL ACTION",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            167.28000000000003,
+            70.47
+          ],
+          [
+            437.2708740234375,
+            70.47
+          ],
+          [
+            437.2708740234375,
+            104.74090576171875
+          ],
+          [
+            167.28000000000003,
+            104.74090576171875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            199.875,
+            307.79999999999995
+          ],
+          [
+            405.84686279296875,
+            307.79999999999995
+          ],
+          [
+            405.84686279296875,
+            324.8809814453125
+          ],
+          [
+            199.875,
+            324.8809814453125
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            23
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            18
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "Picture",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            49
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            24
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            49
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            24
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            9
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            35
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            18
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Caption",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739301"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739301/_page_0_Picture_50.jpeg b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739301/_page_0_Picture_50.jpeg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e2b5a063d8808d75ac69e4c1354e2350552e1d4f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739301/_page_0_Picture_50.jpeg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:1f55f333621a5a714b8fe8cae03431de6270eee7c93858e593fa05934d08d8e6
+size 1166
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739301/_page_0_Picture_57.jpeg b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739301/_page_0_Picture_57.jpeg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..51e1303832066d00abde0e3a02812a818031ebc7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739301/_page_0_Picture_57.jpeg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:8f1982b8c900911de285ea05993470db4ab6387ffd095767be411687df8c0005
+size 12474
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739305/EFTA02739305.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739305/EFTA02739305.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..719d3aa45f54f2b0be875267e99fcc2128781ad3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739305/EFTA02739305.md
@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
+![](_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg)
+
+U.S. Department of Justice
+
+United States Attorney Southern District of Florida
+
+500 South Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561)820-8711 Facsimile: (561) 820-8777
+
+July 10, 2008
+
+## NOTIFICATION OF IDENTIFIED VICTIM
+
+NOTICE: IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 3509(d) AND FLORIDA LAW, THE ATTACHED DOCUMENT IS TO BE TREATED AS CONFIDENTIAL AND SHALL NOT BE DISCLOSED EXCEPT IN CONNECTION WITH A LEGAL PROCEEDING.
+
+![](_page_1_Picture_1.jpeg)
+
+## U.S. Department of Justice
+
+United States Attorney Southern District of Florida
+
+300 South Australian Ave, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 8104711 Facsimile: (561)8104777
+
+July 10, 2008
+
+## VIA FACSIMILE AND U.S. MAIL
+
+Jeffrey Herman, Esq. Herman & Mermelstein, P.A. 18205 Biscayne Boulevard Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160
+
+> Re: thlfreEsteir ypAll NOTIFICATION OF IDENTIFIED VICTIM
+
+Dear Mr. Herman:
+
+By virtue of this letter, the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida asks that you provide the following notice to your client, SS.
+
+On June 30, 2008, Jeffrey Epstein (hereinafter referred to as "Epstein) entered a plea of guilty to violations of Florida Statutes Sections 796.07 (felony solicitation of prostitution) and 796.03 (procurement of minors to engage in prostitution), in the 15th Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County (Case Nos. 2006-cf-009454AXXXMB and 2008-cf-00938 IMOOCMB) and was sentenced to a term of twelve months' imprisonment to be followed by an additional six months' imprisonment, followed by twelve months of Community Control 1, with conditions of community confinement imposed by the Court.
+
+In light of the entry of the guilty plea and sentence, the United States has agreed to defer federal prosecution in favor of this state plea and sentence, subject to certain conditions.
+
+One such condition to which Epstein has agreed is the following:
+
+"Any person, who while a minor, was a victim of a violation of an offense enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, will have the same JEFFREY HERMAN, ESQ.
+
+NOTIFICATION OF IDENTIFIED VICTIMS
+
+JULY 10, 2008
+
+PAGE 2 OF 2
+
+rights to proceed under Section 2255 as she would have had, if Mr. Epstein had been tried federally and convicted of an enumerated offense. For purposes of implementing this paragraph, the United States shall provide Mr. Epstein's attorneys with a list of individuals whom it was prepared to name in an Indictment as victims of an enumerated offense by Mr. Epstein. Any judicial authority interpreting this provision, including any authority determining which evidentiary burdens if any a plaintiff must meet, shall consider that it is the intent of the parties to place these identified victims in the same position as they would have been had Mr. Epstein been convicted at trial. No more; no less."
+
+Through this letter, this Office hereby provides Notice that your client, is an individual whom the United States was prepared to name as a victim of an enumerated offense.
+
+Should your client decide to file a claim against Jeffrey Epstein, his attorney, Jack Goldberger, asks that you contact him at Atterbury Goldberger and Weiss, 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401.
+
+Please understand that neither the U.S. Attorney's Office norgthe Federal Sureau of Investigation can take part in or otherwise assist in civil litigation; however, if you do file a claim under 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and Mr. Epstein denies that your client is a victim of an enumerated offense, please provide written documentation of that denial to the undersigned.
+
+Please thank your client for all of her assistance during the course of this investigation and express the heartfelt regards of myself and Special Agents Kuyrkendall and Richards for the health and well-being of\_
+
+> R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
+
+By:
+
+cc: Jack Goldberger, Esq.
+
+Le (219# 1:C"
+
+A. VILLAFANA ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739305/EFTA02739305.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739305/EFTA02739305.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bf316b31edaa53227a033446e2e1ea5f733b886f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739305/EFTA02739305.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,215 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739305.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 3,
+  "chars": 3989,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 0.94,
+  "image_assets": [
+    "_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg",
+    "_page_1_Picture_1.jpeg"
+  ],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "NOTIFICATION OF IDENTIFIED VICTIM",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            185.43599999999998,
+            250.28999999999996
+          ],
+          [
+            433.95770263671875,
+            250.28999999999996
+          ],
+          [
+            433.95770263671875,
+            265.56353759765625
+          ],
+          [
+            185.43599999999998,
+            265.56353759765625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "U.S. Department of Justice",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            174.42,
+            76.14
+          ],
+          [
+            310.52734375,
+            76.14
+          ],
+          [
+            310.52734375,
+            90.49249267578125
+          ],
+          [
+            174.42,
+            90.49249267578125
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "VIA FACSIMILE AND U.S. MAIL",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            84.456,
+            249.48
+          ],
+          [
+            270.28411865234375,
+            249.48
+          ],
+          [
+            270.28411865234375,
+            264.862548828125
+          ],
+          [
+            84.456,
+            264.862548828125
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            35
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            18
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Picture",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            72
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            34
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            11
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Picture",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            75
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            36
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            14
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739305"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739305/_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739305/_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..00a004328154e6300df1f9f2bf0817f8bf48c3da
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739305/_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:f1dacf7bde129e0747744ba5d1d5802f6784fa666764f881c84264e6ed825076
+size 10615
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739305/_page_1_Picture_1.jpeg b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739305/_page_1_Picture_1.jpeg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4ada4bb0b9d29dbd4052e44ec6ae7d77bf390d04
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739305/_page_1_Picture_1.jpeg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:6bb17520f5f6c720fbbee49298e1ebc6e0f6435110d718a42f12bcc903fda2b5
+size 10771
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739308/EFTA02739308.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739308/EFTA02739308.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e76d2942fcbd6aa6e16bcd541686a1a24707a4b6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739308/EFTA02739308.md
@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
+# UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARla
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+# PLAINTIFF'S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR STAY
+
+Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 3, by and through her undersigned counsel, submits this Memorandum of Law in Response to Motion for Stay, as follows:
+
+# INTRODUCTION
+
+Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Stay this action is based on the incorrect premise that there are criminal actions pending against him in Palm Beach Circuit Court, State of Florida v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 2006 CF 09454 AXXMB (Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County), and in the Southern District of Florida, In re Grand Jury, No. FGJ 07-103 (WPB) (S.D. Fla.). The Motion to Stay as to the state court criminal action was rendered moot on June 30, 2008 when Jeffrey Epstein entered a plea of guilty to violations of Florida Statute §796.07 (felony solicitation of prostitution) and §796.03 (procurement of minors to engage in prostitution) in the state criminal action. (See Defendant's Notice Concerning Motion to Stay dated July 1, 2008). Jeffrey Epstein, now an admitted sex offender, was sentenced to a term of imprisonment followed by community control and sex offender registration.
+
+As to the federal prosecution, Defendant's mistitled "Notice of Continued Pendency of
+
+Federal Criminal Action," which has now been unsealed, makes clear that there is in fact no criminal federal action pending. This Notice discloses a confidential Agreement between the U.S. Attorney and Defendant, the terms of which were triggered when Epstein began serving his state imposed criminal sentence. Under the Agreement, according to the Notice, the U.S. Attorney "agreed to suspend its grand jury investigation", while "retail-1ring] the right to reactivate the grand jury and indict Mr. Epstein should he breach any part of the Agreement during its term, which runs for 33 months, beginning on the date Mr. Epstein began serving his sentence in the Florida Criminal Action." (The terms of this Agreement are also described in the notice letter to the victim Plaintiff, a redacted copy which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A".) Accordingly, as represented in Defendant's own filing, Mr. Epstein is not under indictment and the grand jury is not active in his case. There is simply no pending criminal action, a necessary prerequisite for a stay under 28 U.S.C. §3509(k).
+
+Additionally, the stay provision of 18 U.S.C. 3509(k) is limited to circumstances in which the plaintiff is a "a person who is under the age of 18..." The Statute is therefore inapplicable in that Plaintiff is not a minor, and was not a minor when she filed this lawsuit. The Motion is also procedurally defective because (i) Defendant failed to comply with the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in that Defendant's counsel neither conferred nor attempted to confer with counsel for the Plaintiff as to the relief request prior to filing the Motion to Stay; and (ii) in light of changed circumstances after the tiling of the Motion to Stay, the Motion fails to inform the Plaintiff or the Court of the grounds for the relief sought.
+
+For the foregoing reasons, Defendant's Motion to Stay must be denied in its entirety.
+
+THE DEFENDANT HAS NOT DEMONSTRATED THAT 28 U.S.C. §3509(k) IS APPLICABLE AND A STAY MANDATED
+
+As the movant, it is the Defendant's burden to demonstrate that the requirements for a stay have been met. He has not met this burden. 18 U.S.C. §3509(k) states as follows:
+
+Stay of civil action. -- If, at any time that a cause of action for recovery of compensation for damage or injury to the person of a child exists, a criminal action is pending which arises out of the same occurrence and in which the child is the victim, the civil action shall be stayed until the end of all phases of the criminal action and any mention of the civil action during the criminal proceeding is prohibited. As used in this subsection, a criminal action is pending until its final adjudication in the trial court.
+
+(emphasis added).
+
+A threshold inquiry in determining whether to invoke the stay provision of 18 U.S.C. §3509(k) is whether the plaintiff in a civil action is also the victim of a "criminal action ...pending which arises out of the same occurrence and in which the child is the victim...." (Emphasis supplied). Given Jeffrey Epstein's plea of guilty to the criminal charges in the state case and the Agreement entered into with the U.S. Attorney, his argument that a stay of this lawsuit should be granted because of pending criminal charges appears at this point to be specious. Nonetheless, Defendant Epstein represents to this Court in his "Notice Concerning Motion to Stay" dated July 1, 2008 that "the federal criminal proceeding . . . remains pending." No further explanation is provided. The argument supporting this assertion is unknown to Plaintiff. There is no indication in the statutory language or elsewhere that 18 U.S.C. §3509(k) can be applicable in a situation, such as here, where there is an agreement concerning federal crimes but there has been no indictment.
+
+The notice letter attached hereto as Exhibit "A" further sets forth one of the conditions imposed by Mr. Epstein's Agreement with the U.S. Attorney, as follows: "Any person [including
+
+<sup>&#</sup>x27;The developments relating to the Defendant's plea deal arose after the Defendant filed his Motion to Stay. As a result, the Motion does not explain why a stay is justified under the present circumstances. Plaintiff is at a disadvantage in filing this Memorandum in Response, and is left to guess as the present grounds for the Motion. For this reason alone, the Motion should be denied.
+
+this plaintiff], who while a minor, was a victim of a violation of an offense enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, will have the same rights to proceed under Section 2255 as she would have had, if Mr. Epstein had been tried federally and convicted of an enumerated offense." Thus, not only is a necessary prerequisite for a statutory stay missing in that no criminal case is pending, but a stay under 28 U.S.C. §3509(k) would be inconsistent with Mr. Epstein's Agreement with the U.S. Attorney, which contemplates civil claims by victims pursuant to federal law. Defendant Epstein apparently contends that a stay should nonetheless apply for the next 33 months, preventing for this extended period the civil litigation of these claims, to see if Mr. Epstein complies with his Agreement. Needless to say, this would be absurd. It cannot be seriously argued in the circumstances of this case that a stay under 28 U.S.C. §3509(k) is mandated because there is a "pending" federal criminal action.
+
+# 18 U.S.C. §3509(k) DOES NOT AUTHORIZE A STAY OF A CIVIL LAWSUIT FILED BY AN ADULT PLAINTIFF
+
+Even if there were a criminal case pending, which there is not, 18 U.S.C. §3509(k) would not apply to the claim of a child victim who is now an adult. This Statute applies in situations in which a child who has been the victim of sexual abuse is the plaintiff in a civil lawsuit at the same time that the child is a victim in a criminal proceeding arising out of the same occurrence. That is not the case here. The Plaintiff is an adult and was an adult at the time she filed this civil lawsuit. Defendant misinterprets 18 U.S.C. §3509(k) to suggest that the Statute also applies in instances where an adult plaintiff in the civil lawsuit was a victim of sexual abuse during childhood. A careful reading of the definitions section of 18 U.S.C. §3509 reveals that Defendant's interpretation is incorrect. 18 U.S.C. §3509(a)(2) (defining "child" as person who is under the age of 18).
+
+18 U.S.C. §3509(k) states, in relevant part, as follows:
+
+(k) Stay of civil action. -- If, at any time that a cause of action for recovery of compensation for damage or injury to the person of a child exists, a criminal action is pending which arises out of the same occurrence and in which the child is the victim, the civil action shall be stayed until the end of all phases of the criminal action....
+
+(emphasis added).
+
+18 U.S.C. §3509(2) defines as a "child" as "a person who is under the age of 18." Thus, the term "child" is limited for purposes of 18 U.S.C. §3509 to a person who is currently under the age of 18. While the statute could have been written to say "a person who is under the age of 18 or was under the age of 18 at the time of the abuse", it does not. Yet, this is the precise interpretation suggested by the Defendant.
+
+The plaintiff's interpretation of 18 U.S.C. §3509(k) is not only consistent with the plain language of the statute, but also with the policies underlying the stay provision. The statute is designed to protect children who are involved in legal proceedings arising from physical, sexual, or mental abuse. For instance, 18 U.S.C. §3509 provides protections for persons under the age of 18, including alternatives to live in-court testimony, competency examinations, psychological examinations, privacy issues, filing under seal, closing the courtroom, the handling of videotaped testimony, adult attendants, speedy trials, the use of guardians ad !item and testimonial aids. Each of these protections is only implicated when the victim "is under the age of 18." See 18 U.S.C. §3509(a)(2). In the context of a civil lawsuit, a child similarly needs protection from the possibility of concurrent proceedings involving deposition or trial testimony, psychological examinations, and competency examinations. Moreover, the use of a stay of a civil lawsuit involving a child-plaintiff may be particularly warranted in circumstances where the child may not have had made the decision to file the lawsuit in the first instance. Thus, the law protects the children from multiple concurrent proceedings. These concerns do not exist to the same degree when a competent adult such as the Plaintiff elects to file suit on her own behalf. Yet, the Defendant seeks to carve out an exception where none exists by arguing that the "Stay of Civil Action" provision in subsection (k) must be applied to victims who are 18 or older who were under the age of 18 at the time of their abuse. This argument is unsupported by the statute or its underlying policies.
+
+The unpublished, trial court decisions cited by Defendant of Doe v. Francis 2005 WL 517487 (N.D. Fla. Apr. 20, 2005) (Francis I) and Doe v. Francis 2005 WL 950623 (N.D. Fla. Apr. 20, 2005) (Francis 11) are readily distinguishable. The Plaintiffs in Francis I and Francis 11 "offered no legal authority or evidence to support their argument that the stay should be lifted." Francis 11,at\*l. By contrast, in this case, the Plaintiff has cited the definition of "child" found in 18 U.S.C. §3509(a)(2). The Francis cases also involved seven plaintiffs, three of whom were victims in the criminal case. That is not the case here were the only plaintiff in this lawsuit is not a victim in a pending criminal case. Additionally, the stay in the Francis cases was imposed before the plaintiffs reached the age of majority. Here, the civil lawsuit was not even filed until after the plaintiff reached the age of majority.
+
+#### DEFENDANT'S MOTION SHOULD BE DENIED IN THAT DEFENDANT DID NOT CONFER WITH PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL PRIOR TO FILING HIS MOTION, AND THE MOTION FAILS TO INFORM PLAINTIFF OR THE COURT OF THE GROUNDS FOR RELIEF IN LIGHT OF CHANGED CIRCUMSTANCES
+
+Defendant's Motion should be denied in that Defendant failed to comply with the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in that Defendant's counsel neither conferred nor attempted to confer with counsel for the Plaintiff as to the relief request prior to filing the Motion to Stay. See S.D. Fla. L. R. 7.1.A.3. Notably, Defendant's Motion also contains no certification as to any such attempt as required by the Local Rules. Ste id. The Local Rules provide that the "fflailure to comply with the requirements of this rule may be cause for the court to grant or deny the motion and impose on counsel an appropriate sanction, which may include an order to pay the amount of the reasonable expenses incurred because of the violation, including a reasonable attorney's fee." Id.
+
+Finally, when the circumstances materially changed after the filing of the Motion, it was incumbent upon the Defendant to either withdraw the Motion or at least amend it to explain the grounds for a stay in light of the plea deal. Defendant has not done so, to the prejudice of Plaintiff in preparing this Memorandum in response. For this reason alone the Motion to Stay should be denied.
+
+# CONCLUSION
+
+Based on the foregoing, Plaintiff requests that this Court deny Defendant's Motion to Stay pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 3509(k) in its entirety, award attorney's fees to Plaintiff for Defendant's failure to comply with Southern District of Florida Local Rule 7. I .A.3, and all other relief this Court deems just and appropriate.
+
+Dated: July 18, 2008. Respectfully submitted,
+
+By: s/ Jeffrey M. Herman Jeffrey M. Herman (FL Bar No. 521647) jherman@hermanlaw.com Stuart S. Mermelstein (FL Bar No. 947245) ssm@hermanlaw.com Adam D. Horowitz (FL Bar No. 376980) ahorowitz@hermanlaw.com HERMAN & MERMELSTEIN, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiffs Jane Doe 18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160 Tel: 305-931-2200 Fax: 305-931-0877
+
+# CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
+
+I hereby certify that on July 18, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day to all parties on the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those parties who are not authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing.
+
+/s/ Jeffrey M. Herman
+
+### SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRa United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger jagesq@bcllsouth.nct
+
+Michael R. Tein tein@lewistein.com
+
+Is/ Jeffrey M. Herman
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739308/EFTA02739308.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739308/EFTA02739308.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0331eec7eb2c252cc9befa4c62104944c098621d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739308/EFTA02739308.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,543 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739308.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 9,
+  "chars": 14274,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.2,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            405.95098876953125,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            405.95098876953125,
+            115.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            115.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "PLAINTIFF'S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN \nRESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR STAY",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            159.732,
+            295.65
+          ],
+          [
+            454.1123046875,
+            295.65
+          ],
+          [
+            454.1123046875,
+            325.10302734375
+          ],
+          [
+            159.732,
+            325.10302734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "INTRODUCTION",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            256.428,
+            393.65999999999997
+          ],
+          [
+            356.9616394042969,
+            393.65999999999997
+          ],
+          [
+            356.9616394042969,
+            409.10302734375
+          ],
+          [
+            256.428,
+            409.10302734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "18 U.S.C. \u00a73509(k) DOES NOT AUTHORIZE A STAY \nOF A CIVIL LAWSUIT FILED BY AN ADULT PLAINTIFF",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            144.432,
+            392.84999999999997
+          ],
+          [
+            468.3997802734375,
+            392.84999999999997
+          ],
+          [
+            468.3997802734375,
+            422.9830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            144.432,
+            422.9830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "DEFENDANT'S MOTION SHOULD BE DENIED IN THAT \nDEFENDANT DID NOT CONFER WITH PLAINTIFF'S \nCOUNSEL PRIOR TO FILING HIS MOTION, AND THE MOTION \nFAILS TO INFORM PLAINTIFF OR THE COURT OF THE \nGROUNDS FOR RELIEF IN LIGHT OF CHANGED CIRCUMSTANCES",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            111.384,
+            477.09000000000003
+          ],
+          [
+            503.51043701171875,
+            477.09000000000003
+          ],
+          [
+            503.51043701171875,
+            548.9830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            111.384,
+            548.9830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CONCLUSION",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            263.15999999999997,
+            281.88
+          ],
+          [
+            350.86065673828125,
+            281.88
+          ],
+          [
+            350.86065673828125,
+            296.68353271484375
+          ],
+          [
+            263.15999999999997,
+            296.68353271484375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            227.052,
+            85.05
+          ],
+          [
+            385.39947509765625,
+            85.05
+          ],
+          [
+            385.39947509765625,
+            100.863037109375
+          ],
+          [
+            227.052,
+            100.863037109375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "SERVICE LIST \nDOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN \nCASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRa \nUnited States District Court, Southern District of Florida",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            157.28400000000002,
+            85.05
+          ],
+          [
+            455.5345764160156,
+            85.05
+          ],
+          [
+            455.5345764160156,
+            143.60302734375
+          ],
+          [
+            157.28400000000002,
+            143.60302734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            59
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            59
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            30
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            65
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            59
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            57
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            29
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            20
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739308"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739317/EFTA02739317.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739317/EFTA02739317.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c33854e21aa280b84b57e5814c95336065822a8b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739317/EFTA02739317.md
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARla
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant. /
+
+## DECLARATION OF JEFFREY M. HERMAN REGARDING SERVICE OF PROCESS AND THIS COURT'S ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
+
+Jeffrey M. Herman, deposes and states as follows:
+
+I. I am counsel for Plaintiff in this action. After the parties' briefed the issue of service of process on Defendant Jeffrey Epstein, this Court found valid service under New York law and entered an Order to Show Cause Why Default Should Not be Entered Against Defendant Jeffrey Epstein, dated July 16, 2008.
+
+2. I submit this Declaration to correct what appears to be a factual error in the Court's Order to Show Cause. I do so even though this error is in Plaintiffs favor.
+
+3. In the Order to Show Cause, this Court finds that "[t]he process server also mailed a copy of the summons and complaint to Defendant on May 5, 2008, via first class mail. (DE4)." It is my understanding that the Affidavit of Service (DE 4) crosses out language regarding mail to the Defendant, and that the process server in this case did not mail a copy of the Summons and Complaint to the Defendant's New York address. In none of the papers Plaintiff filed in this matter is it asserted that the Summons and Complaint was mailed, nor did Plaintiff claim that service was valid under New York law.
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRa
+
+Under penalties of perjury, I declare the foregoing to be true and correct.
+
+Dated: July 21, 2008.
+
+s/ Jeffrey M. Herman Jeffrey M. Herman
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739317/EFTA02739317.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739317/EFTA02739317.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d52a241556073078f89d4d612965c81049a91cf0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739317/EFTA02739317.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,143 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739317.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 2,
+  "chars": 1557,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 0.67,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            406.3231201171875,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            406.3231201171875,
+            100.18353271484375
+          ],
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            100.18353271484375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "DECLARATION OF JEFFREY M. HERMAN REGARDING SERVICE \nOF PROCESS AND THIS COURT'S ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            115.66799999999999,
+            281.07
+          ],
+          [
+            496.9223937988281,
+            281.07
+          ],
+          [
+            496.9223937988281,
+            310.4830627441406
+          ],
+          [
+            115.66799999999999,
+            310.4830627441406
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            54
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            9
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            16
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739317"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739319/EFTA02739319.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739319/EFTA02739319.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0e7d5bd1b25be36e9623229db87d3a2f3db8c297
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739319/EFTA02739319.md
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-80232-CIV-MARRA/
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## DEFENDANT'S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
+
+Pursuant to Rule 7.1(B)(1) of the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, defendant Jeffrey Epstein respectfully requests oral argument in connection with his motion to stay.
+
+Defendant believes an opportunity to formally argue the motion would assist the Court in ruling on his motion, which seeks to stay this action until resolution of a pending criminal action.
+
+Defendant estimates that the time required for argument is one hour.
+
+![](_page_0_Picture_13.jpeg)
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+TEIN, P.L. 3059 Grand Avenue, Suite 340 Coconut Grove, Florida 33133 Tel: 305 442 1101 Fax: 305 442 6744
+
+By: /s/ Michael R. Tein GUY A. Ha. Bar No. 623740 MICHAEL R. TEIN Fla. Bar No. 993522 tein@lewistein.com
+
+> ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER & WEISS, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Tel. 561 659 8300 Fax. 561 835 8691
+
+By: Jack A. Goldberger Ha. Bar No. 262013 jgoldberger@agwpa.com
+
+Attorneys for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
+
+## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
+
+I HEREBY CERTIFY that on July 25, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on counsel of record identified below by U.S. Mail.
+
+> /s/ Michael R. Tein Michael R. Tein
+
+## Service List
+
+Jeffrey M. Herman, Esq. Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Herman & Mermelstein, P.A. 18205 Biscayne Blvd, Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160 Fax: 305 931 0877
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739319/EFTA02739319.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739319/EFTA02739319.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f23982c20a089bff7d3dd7b04b44546ecf9331ed
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739319/EFTA02739319.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,233 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739319.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 3,
+  "chars": 1705,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 0.9,
+  "image_assets": [
+    "_page_0_Picture_13.jpeg"
+  ],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            184.82399999999998,
+            72.08999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            417.3464050292969,
+            72.08999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            417.3464050292969,
+            104.75091552734375
+          ],
+          [
+            184.82399999999998,
+            104.75091552734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "DEFENDANT'S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            136.476,
+            348.29999999999995
+          ],
+          [
+            476.40521240234375,
+            348.29999999999995
+          ],
+          [
+            476.40521240234375,
+            365.7509460449219
+          ],
+          [
+            136.476,
+            365.7509460449219
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            209.91600000000003,
+            72.9
+          ],
+          [
+            402.1851806640625,
+            72.9
+          ],
+          [
+            402.1851806640625,
+            89.00091552734375
+          ],
+          [
+            209.91600000000003,
+            89.00091552734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Service List",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            267.44399999999996,
+            281.07
+          ],
+          [
+            343.62774658203125,
+            281.07
+          ],
+          [
+            343.62774658203125,
+            297.5009765625
+          ],
+          [
+            267.44399999999996,
+            297.5009765625
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            39
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            20
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            11
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Picture",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            58
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            45
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            21
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739319"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739319/_page_0_Picture_13.jpeg b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739319/_page_0_Picture_13.jpeg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4154bcf47f653f2556b534ccf6060a48192c8e57
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739319/_page_0_Picture_13.jpeg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:89860be1515d1a5a15a669128dfc03e8bf1c7b4a40dc51e1b9ca48e789d6ab08
+size 2491
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739322/EFTA02739322.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739322/EFTA02739322.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bcbc8632b56a768e997631d1221c3a364f1533b6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739322/EFTA02739322.md
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+NO. 08-80232-CIV-MARRA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+v.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+/
+
+## ORDER DENYING MOTION TO ENTER DEFAULT
+
+THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Default by Clerk (DE 5), filed May 29, 2008. The motion is now fully briefed and is ripe for review. The Court has carefully considered the motion and is otherwise fully advised in the premises.
+
+On July 16, 2008, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause' why default should not be entered against Defendant Jeffrey Epstein (DE 17), arguing that Defendant had let more than twenty days elapse after service of process before attempting to respond to the Complaint. As the Court explained, under New York law, personal service may be made on an individual by
+
+> delivering the summons within the state to a person of suitable age and discretion at the actual place of business, dwelling place or usual place of abode of the person to be served and by either mailing the summons to the person to be served at his or her last known residence or by mailing the summons by first class mail to the person to be served at his or her actual place of business in an envelope bearing the legend "personal and confidential" and not indicating on the outside thereof, by return address or otherwise, that the communication is from an attorney or concerns an action against the person to be served, such delivery and mailing to be
+
+<sup>&#</sup>x27;The Court presumes familiarity with the contents of this Order.
+
+effected within twenty days of each other.
+
+N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 308(2) (McKinney 2008) (emphasis added). Based on the Court's reading of the Affidavit of Service (DE 4), it appeared that Plaintiff's process server had mailed a copy of the Summons and Complaint to Defendant on May 5, 2008. What appeared to be a distortion in the document due to its electronic upload into the Court's CM/ECF system, however, was apparently a line striking the language from the affidavit regarding the mailing of the Summons and Complaint. (See DE 21.) Plaintiff brought this error to the Court's attention after the Court issued its Order to Show Cause.
+
+Because the Summons and Complaint were not mailed to Defendant, service was not accomplished under New York law' See N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 308(2). Further, as the Court has already explained, service was not effective under either the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or Florida law' Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Default Against Defendant(DE 5) is DENIED. Plaintiff shall have forty-five (45) days from the date of entry of this Order to serve a copy of the Summons and Complaint on Defendant. Failure to serve Defendant within forty-five days shall result in dismissal of the above-styled action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). It is further ORDERED that Defendant is relieved of responsibility from responding to the Court's
+
+<sup>&#</sup>x27;Interestingly, Plaintiff did not bring this issue to the Court&#x27;s attention in its Reply brief. Defendant&#x27;s Response to the Motion (DE 10) made clear that he assumed all the steps were taken to serve Defendant in accordance with New York law, including that copies were sent through the mail.</p><p><sup>&#</sup>x27;The Court again declines to allow discovery on whether Richard Bamett resides at Defendant&#x27;s New York home. Mr. Barnett submitted an affidavit sworn under penalty of perjury that he does not reside at that address. (See Barnett Aff.) Plaintiff has not submitted any evidence to suggest that Mr. Bamett is not credible, so allowing discovery on this point would simply be a waste of resources.</p><p block-type='Text'>Order to Show Cause (DE 17) issued on July 16, 2008.</p><p block-type='Text'>DONE AND ORDERED in at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County,</p><p block-type='Text'>Florida, this 25ih day of July, 2008.</p><p block-type='Text'>KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge</p><p block-type='Text'>Copies furnished to: all counsel of record</p>
+ </body>
+</html></sup>
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739322/EFTA02739322.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739322/EFTA02739322.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..899fb05057a478ea69eba5de0c769ef9a28ddf97
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739322/EFTA02739322.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,185 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739322.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 3,
+  "chars": 4064,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 0.85,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            206.856,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            405.5581359863281,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            405.5581359863281,
+            100.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            206.856,
+            100.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "ORDER DENYING MOTION TO ENTER DEFAULT",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            162.792,
+            298.08
+          ],
+          [
+            450.37054443359375,
+            298.08
+          ],
+          [
+            450.37054443359375,
+            313.1030578613281
+          ],
+          [
+            162.792,
+            313.1030578613281
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            63
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            30
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            61
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            21
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739322"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739325/EFTA02739325.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739325/EFTA02739325.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..30773e3ad334fdfe50944244da2200256098acab
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739325/EFTA02739325.md
@@ -0,0 +1,383 @@
+# EXHIBIT A
+
+IN RE: JANE DOE,
+
+Petitioner.
+
+/
+
+## DECLARATION OF A. VILLAFARA IN SUPPORT OF UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO VICTIM'S EMERGENCY PETITION FOR ENFORCEMENT OF CRIME VICTIM RIGHTS ACT, 18 U.S.C. § <sup>3771</sup>
+
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/ FILED by S D.C.
+
+JUL 0 9 2008
+
+STEVEN M. LAIRMORE CLERK U.S. D1St CT. S.D. or rm. . W.P.S.
+
+1. I, A. Villafatia, do hereby declare that I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of Florida. I graduated from the University of California at Berkeley School of Law (Boalt III in 1993. After serving as <sup>a</sup>judicial clerk to the Hon. David F. Levi in Sacramento, California, I was admitted to practice in California in 1995. I also am admitted to practice in all courts of the states of Minnesota and Florida, the Eighth, Eleventh, and Federal Circuit Courts of Appeals, and the U.S. District Courts for the Southern District of Florida, the District of Minnesota, and the Northern District of California. My bar admission status in California and Minnesota is currently inactive. I am currently employed as an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of Florida and was so employed during all of the events described herein.
+
+2. I am the Assistant United States Attorney assigned to the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein. The case was investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation ("FBI"). The federal investigation was initiated in 2006 at the request of the Palm Beach Police Department ("PBPD") into allegations that Jeffrey Epstein, and his personal assistants had used facilities of interstate commerce to induce young girls between the ages of thirteen and seventeen to engage in prostitution, amongst other offenses.
+
+3. Throughout the investigation, when a victim was identified, victim notification letters were provided to her both from your Affiant and from the FBI's Victim-Witness Specialist. Attached hereto are copies of the letters provided to MN three clients, T.M., C.W., and S.R.' Your Affiant's letter to C.W. was provided by the FBI. (Ex. 1). Your Affiant's letter to T.M. was hand-delivered by myself to T.M. at the time that she was interviewed (Ex. 2).<sup>2</sup> Both C.W. and T.M. also received letters from the FBI's Victim-Witness Specialist, which were sent on January 10, 2008 (Exs. 3 & 4). S.R. was identified via the FBI's investigation in 2007, but she initially refused to speak with investigators. S.R.'s status as a victim of a federal offense was confirmed when she was interviewed by
+
+<sup>&#</sup>x27;Attorney filed his Motion on behalf of "Jane Doe," without identifying which of his clients is the purported victim. Accordingly, l will address facts related to C.W., T.M., and S.R. All three of those clients were victims of Jeffrey Epstein's while they were minors beginning when they were fifteen years old.
+
+<sup>?</sup>Please note that the dates on the U.S. Attorney's Office letters to C.W. and T.M. are not the dates that the letters were actually delivered. Letters to all known victims were prepared early in the investigation and delivered as each victim was contacted.
+
+federal agents on May 28, 2008. The FBI's Victim-Witness Specialist sent a letter to S.R. on May 30, 2008 (Ex. 5).
+
+4. Throughout the investigation, the FBI agents, the FBI's Victim-Witness Specialist, and your A fliant had contact with C. W. and S.R. Attorney other client, T.M., was represented by counsel and, accordingly, all contact with T.M. was made through that attorney. That attorney was James Eisenberg, and his fees were paid by Jeffrey Epstein,. the target of the investigation!
+
+5. In the summer of 2007, Mr. Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("the Office") entered into negotiations to resolve the investigation. At that time, Mr. Epstein had been charged by the State of Florida with solicitation of prostitution, in violation of Florida Statutes § 796.07. Mr. Epstein's attorneys sought a global resolution of the matter. The United States subsequently agreed to defer federal prosecution in favor of prosecution by the State of Florida, so long as certain basic preconditions were met. One of the key objectives for the Government was to preserve <sup>a</sup> federal remedy for the young girls whom Epstein had sexually exploited. Thus, one condition of that agreement, notice of which was provided to the victims on July 9, 2008. is the following:
+
+"Any person, who while a minor, was a victim of a violation of an offense enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, will have the same rights to proceed under Section 2255 as she would have had, if Mr. Epstein
+
+<sup>3</sup>The undersigned does not know when Mr. began representing T.M. or whether T.M. ever formally terminated Mr. Eisenberg's representation.
+
+had been tried federally and convicted of an enumerated offense. For purposes of implementing this paragraph, the United States shall provide Mr. Epstein'S attorneys with a list of individuals whom it was prepared to name in an Indictment as victims of an enumerated offense by Mr. Epstein. Any judicial authority interpreting this provision, including any authority determining which evidentiary burdens if any a plaintiff must meet, shall consider that it is the intent of the parties to place these identified victims in the same position as they would have been had Mr. Epstein been convicted at trial. No more; no less."
+
+6. An agreement was reached in September 2007. The Agreement contained an express confidentiality provision.
+
+7. Although individual victims were not consulted regarding the agreement, several had expressed concerns regarding the exposure of their identities at trial and they desired a prompt resolution of the matter. At the time the agreement was signed in September 2007, T.M. was openly hostile to the prosecution of Epstein. The FBI attempted to interview S.R. in October 2007, at which time she refused to provide any information regarding Jeffrey Epstein. None of Attorney clients had expressed a desire to be consulted prior to the resolution of the federal investigation.
+
+8. As explained above, one of the terms of the agreement deferring prosecution to the State of Florida was securing a federal remedy for the victims. In October 2007, shortly after the agreement was signed, four victims were contacted and these provisions were discussed. One of those victims was C.V.-who at the time wag not represented, and she was given notice of the agreement. Notice was also provided of an expected change of plea in October 2007. When Epstein's attorneys learned that some of the victims had been
+
+notified, they complained that the victims were receiving an incentive to overstate their involvement with Mr. Epstein in order to increase their damages claims. Mile your Affiant knew that the victims' statements had been taken and corroborated with independent evidence well before they were informed of the potential for damages, the agents and <sup>I</sup> concluded that informing additional victims could compromise the witnesses' credibility at trial if Epstein reneged on the agreement.
+
+9. After C.W. had been notified of the terms of the agreement, but before Epstein • performed his obligations, C.W. contacted the FBI because Epstein's counsel was attempting to take her deposition and private investigators were harassing her. Your Affiant secured pro bono counsel to represent C.W. and several other identified victims. Pro bono counsel was able to assist C.W. in avoiding the improper deposition. That pro bono counsel did not express to your Affiant that C.W. was dissatisfied with the resolution of the matter.
+
+10. In mid-June 2008, Attorney contacted your Affiant to inform me that he represented C.W. and S.R. and asked to meet to provide me with information regarding Epstein. I invited Attorney to send to me any information that he wanted me to consider. Nothing was provided. I also advised Attorney that he should consider contacting the State Attorney's Office, if he so wished. I understand that no contact with that office was made. Attorney EdWards hid 'alluded to T.M:, sol ildcjiged him that, to my knowledge, T.M. was still represented by Attorney James Eisenberg.
+
+• 1 I. On Friday, June 27, 2008, at approximate 4:15 p.m., your Affiant received <sup>a</sup> copy of the proposed state plea agreement and learned that the plea was scheduled for 8:30 a.m., Monday, lune 30, 2008. Your Affiant and the Palm Beach Police Department attempted to provide notification to victims in the short time that Epstein's counsel had given us. Although all known victims were not notified, your Affiant specifically called attorney to provide notice to his clients regarding the hearing. Your Affiant believes that it was during this conversation that Attorney notified me that he represented T.M., and I assumed that he would pass on the notice to her, as well. Attorney informed your Affiant that he could not attend but that someone would be present at the hearing. Your Affiant attended the hearing, but none of Attorney I= clients was present.
+
+12. On today's date, your Affiant provided the attached victim notifications to C.W. and S.R. via their attorney, (Exs. 6 & 7). A notification was not provided to T.M. because the U.S. Attorney's modification limited Epstein's liability to victims whom the United States was prepared to name in an indictment. In light of T.M.'s prior statements to law enforcement, your Affiant could not in good faith include T.M. as <sup>a</sup> victim in an indictment and, accordingly, could not include her in the list provided to Epstein's counsel.
+
+13. Furthermore, with respeet fdtheCertifieaticiri of Emergency, Attorney did not ever contact me prior to the filing of that Certification to demand the relief that he requests in his Emergency Petition. On the afternoon ofluly 7, 2008, after your Affiant had
+
+already received the Certification of Emergency and Emergency Petition, I received a letter from Attorney [REDACTED] that had been sent, via Certified Mail, on July 3, 2008. While that letter urges the Attorney General and the United States Attorney to consider "vigorous enforcement" of federal laws with respect to Jeffrey Epstein, it contains no demand for the relief requested in the Emergency Petition.
+
+14. I declare under penalty of perjury, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746 that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
+
+Executed this 9th day of July, 2008.
+
+![]()
+
+#### DELIVERY BY HAND
+
+Miss ads a
+
+![](_page_8_Picture_3.jpeg)
+
+### U.S. Department of Justice
+
+United States Attorney Southern District of Florida
+
+![](_page_8_Picture_6.jpeg)
+
+SOO Sough Australian Ave , Suite <sup>400</sup> ;Vest Pa/in Bench, FL. 33401 (S61)820-87/I Facsimile: (361)820-8777
+
+June 7, 2007
+
+Re: Crime Victims' and Witnesses' Rights
+
+Dear Miss Via
+
+Pursuant to the Justice for All Act of2004, as a victim and/or witness of a federal offense, you have a number of rights. Those rights arc:
+
+- (I) The right to be reasonably protected from the accused.
+- (2) The right to reasonable, accurate, and timely notice of any public court proceeding involving the crime or of any release or escape of the accused.
+- (3) The right not to be excluded from any public court proceeding, unless the court determines that your testimony may be materially altered if you are present for other portions of a proceeding.
+- (4) The right to be reasonably heard at any public proceeding in the district court involving release, plea, or sentencing.
+- (5) The reasonable right to confer with the attorney for the United States in the case.
+- (6) The right to Ml and timely restitution as provided in law.
+- (7) The right to proceedings free from unreasonable delay.
+- (8) The right to be treated with fairness and with respect for the victim's dignity and privacy. fr
+
+Members of tare U.S. Department of Justice and other federal investigative agencies, including the Federal Bureau of Investigation, must use their best efforts to make sure that these rights are protected. If you have any concerns in this regard, please feel free to contact me at <sup>561</sup> 209-1047, or Special Agent Nesbitt Kuyrkendall frorwthe Federal Bureau of Investigation at <sup>561</sup> 822-5946. You also• can contact-theliiifiae Ejefirtniinn.°Wee fer NietibiS Crithe iii Washington, D.C. at 202-307-5983. That Office has a website at www.ovc.gov.
+
+You con seek the advice of an attorney with respect to the rights listed above and, if you believe that the rights ::et forth above are being violated, you have the right to petition. the Court for relief.
+
+Miss JUNE 7, 2007 Pitor 2
+
+Inaddiiion to these rights, you are entitled to counseling and medical services, and protection from intimidation and harassment. if the Court determines that you arc <sup>a</sup>victim, you also may be entitled to restitution from the perpetrator. A list of counseling and medical service providers can be provided to you, if you so desire. If you or your family is subjected to any intimidation or harassment, please contact Special Agent Kuyrkendall or myself immediately. It is possihle that someone working on behalf of the targets of the investigation may contact you. Such contact does not violabithe law:- However, if you are contacted, you have the choice of speaking to that person or refusing to'clo to. If you refuse and feel that you are being threatened or harassed, then please • contact Special Agent Kuyrkendall or myself.
+
+You also are entitled to notification ofupcoming case events. At this time, yourcase is under investigation) I (anyone is charged in connection with the investigation, you will be notified.
+
+Sincerely,
+
+R. Alexander Acosta United States Attorney
+
+By: 4.elgeaoruc,\_ A. VillafaAa Assistant United States Attorney
+
+cc: Special Agent Nesbitt Kuyrkendall, F.B.I.
+
+rr
+
+![](_page_10_Picture_2.jpeg)
+
+United Slates Attorney • Southern District of Florida
+
+![](_page_10_Picture_5.jpeg)
+
+500 South Australian /Ivr.. Suite 400 Wets Palm °coca. FL 33401 (361) 8204711 Facsimile: (561) 820-8777
+
+August I I, 2006
+
+#### DELIVERY BY HAND
+
+Miss Tea
+
+Re: Crime Victims' and WitnessesiRigts
+
+Dear Miss Me
+
+Pursuant to the Justice for All Act of 2004, as a victim and/or witness of a federal offense, you have a number of rights. Those rights are:
+
+- (I ) The right to be reasonably protected from the accused.
+- (2) The right to reasonable, accurate, and timely notice of any public court proceeding involving the crime or of any release or escape of the accused.
+- (3) The right not to be excluded from any public court pmcecding, unless the court determines that your testimony may be materially altered if you are present for other portions of a proceeding.
+- (4) The right to be reasonably heard at any public proceeding in the district court involving release, plea, or sentencing.
+- (5) The retsonable right to confer with the attorney for the United States in the case.
+- (6) The right to full and timely restitution as provided in law.
+- (7) The right to proceedings free from unreasonable delay.
+- (8) The right to be treated with fairness and with respect for the victim's dignity and privacy. (
+
+Members of the U.S. Department of Justice and other federal investigative agencies, including the Federal Bureau of Investigation, must use their best efforts to make sure that these rights are protected. If you have any concerns in this regard; please feel free to contact me at <sup>561</sup> 209.1047, or Special Agent Nesbitt Kuyrkendall from the Federal Bureau of Investigation at <sup>561</sup> 822-5946.--Xou also can-contact-the Justice :Deparfrncnt.'s Office Sot -Victims..of -Clime in Washington, D.C. at 202-307.5983. That Office has a websitc at www.ovc.gov.
+
+You can seek the advice of an attorney with respect to the rights listed above and, if you believe that the rights set forth above are being violated, you have the right to petition the Court for relief
+
+MISS Tela AUGUST I 1,2006 PAGE 2
+
+In addition to these rights, youare entitled to counseling and medical services, and I., .• from intimidation and harassment. ff the Court determines that you are <sup>a</sup>victim, you entitled to restitution from the perpetrator. A list of counseling and medical service pit,. • be provided to you, if you so desire. If you or your family is subjected to any inti:i • harassment, please contact Special Agent Kuyrkendall or myself immediately. It is <sup>p</sup> someone working on behalf of the targets of the investigation may contact you. Such cur. not violate the law. However, if you are contacted, you have the choice of speaking to it): or refusing to do so. If you refuse and feel that you are being threatened or harassed, IN. Contact Special Agent Kuyrkendall or myself.
+
+You also are entitled to notification of upcoming case events. At this time, your L.., .• investigation. If anyone is charged in connection with the investigation, you will he it.
+
+Sincerely,
+
+R. Alexander Acosta United States Attorney
+
+By:
+
+A. Villafana Assistant United States Attorney
+
+cc: Special Agent Nesbitt Kuyrkendall, F.B.I.
+
+![](_page_12_Picture_1.jpeg)
+
+U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Invest gallon FBI - West Palm Beach Suite 500 505 South Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (581) 833-7517 Fax (561) 833-7970
+
+January 10, 2008
+
+Re: Case Numbere
+
+Dear Mae
+
+This case Is currently under Investigation. This can be a lengthy process and we request your continued patience while we conduct a thorough Investigation.
+
+As a crime victim, you have the following rights under 18 United states Code § 3771: (1) The right to be reasonably protected from the accused; (2) The right to reasonable, accurate, and timely notice of any public court proceeding, or any parole proceeding, Involving the crime or of any release or escape of the accused; (3) The right not to be excluded from any such public court proceeding, unless thecourt, after receiving clear and convincing evidence, determines that testimony by the victim would be materially altered If the victim heard other testimony et that proceeding; (4) The tight to be reasonably heard al any public proceeding In the district court Involving release, Plea, sentencing, or any parole proceeding; (5) The reasonable right to confer With the attorney for the Government In the case; (6) The right to full end timely restitution as provided In law: (7) The right to proceedings free from unreasonable delay; (II) The right to be treated with fairness and with respect for the victim's dignity and privacy.
+
+We Ml make our best efforts to ensure you are- accorded the rights described. Most of these rights pertain to events occurring sitar the arrest or indictment of an Individual for the crime, and it will become the responsibility of the prosecuting Untied States Attorney's Office to ensure you are accorded those rights. You may also seek the advice of a private attorney with respect to these rights.
+
+The Victim Notification System (VNS) is designed to provide you with direct Information regarding the case es it proceeds through the criminal Justice system. You may obtain current Information about this matter on the Internet el WWW.Notify.US00,J.GOV or from the VNS Call Canter at 1-865-00J-4YOU (1-866-365- 4968) (TDD/TTY: 1.866.2284619) (International: I.502.213-2767). In addition, you may use the Can Center or Internet to update your contact information andlor change your decision about participation in the notification program. If you update your Intention to Include a current email address, VNS will send information to that address. You wig need the following Victim Identification Number (VIN) '1941737' and' Personal Identification Number (PIN) '5502' anytime you contact the Call Center and the first time you log on to VNS on the Internal In addition, the first time you access the VNS Internet site, you will be prompted to enter your last name (or business name) es currently contained in VNS. The name you should enter Is veli
+
+![](_page_12_Picture_11.jpeg)
+
+If you have additional questions which Involve this matter, please contact the office listed above. When you Cat please provide the Olt number located at the top of this letter. Please remember. your parlicipaton in the notification part of this program is voluntary. In order to, continue to receive notifications. It is your responsibility to keep your contact Information current.
+
+Sincerely.
+
+IAA jiwnrCA)
+
+Twilef MI Victim Specialist
+
+![](_page_14_Picture_1.jpeg)
+
+U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Investigation FBI - Wesl Palm Beach Suite 500 505 South Finder Drive West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561) 833.7517 Fax: (581)833-7970
+
+January 10, 2006
+
+James Eisenberg One Cleadake Center Ste 704 Australian South Weal Palm Beach, FL 33401
+
+Re:
+
+Dear James Eisenberg:
+
+You have requested to receNe notifications for Tan.
+
+This case is amenity under Investigation. This can be a lengthy process and we request your continued patience while we conduct a thorough Investigation.
+
+Asa crime victim, you have the following rights under 18 Untied States Code § 3771: (1) The right to be reasonably protected from the.accused; (2) The right to reasonable, accurate, and timely notice of any public court proceeding, or any parole proceeding, trivoMng the thins or of any release or escape of the accused; (3) The right not to be excluded from any auch public court proceeding. unless the court. after • receiving clear and convincing evidence, determines that testimony by the victim would be materially altered if the victim heard other testimony at that proceeding; (4) The right to be reasonably heard at any public proceeding In tha district court Involving release, plea, sentencing. or any parole proceeding; (5) The reasonable right to confer with the attorney for the Government in the case; (6) The right to full and timely restitution as provided In law; (7) The right to proceedings free from unreasonable delay: (8) The right to be treated with fairness and with respect for the victim's dignity and privacy.
+
+We Will make our best efforts to ensure you are accorded the rights described. Most of these rights pertain to events occurring after the arrest or Indictment of an individual for the crime, and It will become the responsibility of the prosecuting United States Attorney's Office to ensure you are accorded those rights. You may Bk9O seek the advice of aprivate attorney with respect to these rights.
+
+The Victim Notification System (VNS) is designed to provide you with direct Information regarding the case as <sup>n</sup>proceeds through the criminal justice system. You may obtain current Information about this matter on the Internet at WWW.NotIty.USDO.LGov or from the VNS Call Center al 1.668-D0J-4YOU (1-866-385- 4968) (TDD/TTY: 1-866-228-4619) (international: 1-502-213-2767). In addition, you may use the Cal Center or Internet to update your contact information anti/or change your decision about participation in the notification program, If you update your Information to Include acurrent email address. VNS will send information to that address. You wil need the following Victim Identification Number WIN) '1941741' and Personal Identification Number (PIN) 7760' anytime you contact the Call Center and the first time you log on to -VNSontheintemet:-In addition.•the first time you access thei/NSintemel she, you will-be prompted:to enter your last name (or business name) as currently contained in VNS. The name you should enter is Eisenberg.
+
+![](_page_14_Picture_12.jpeg)
+
+If you have additional questions which Involve this matter, please contact the office listed above. When You call, please provkie the flle number located at the top of this letter. Please remember, your participation in the notification part of this program Is voluntary. In order to continue to receive notifications. It is your responsibility to keep your contact Information current.
+
+Sincerely.
+
+:11:1`)
+
+T Victim veller nisi
+
+![](_page_16_Picture_733.jpeg)
+
+U.S. Department of Justice  
+Federal Bureau of Investigation  
+FBI - West Palm Beach  
+Suite 500  
+505 South Flagler Drive  
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401  
+Phone: (561) 833-7517  
+Fax: (561) 833-7970
+
+![](_page_16_Picture_735.jpeg)
+
+May 30, 2008
+
+SECRET  
+[REDACTED]
+
+Re: [REDACTED]
+
+Dear SA [REDACTED]
+
+Your name was referred to the FBI's Victim Assistance Program as being a possible victim of a federal crime. We appreciate your assistance and cooperation while we are investigating this case. We would like to make you aware of the victim services that may be available to you and to answer any questions you may have regarding the criminal justice process throughout the investigation. Our program is part of the FBI's effort to ensure the victims are treated with respect and are provided information about their rights under federal law. These rights include notification of the status of the case. The enclosed brochures provide information about the FBI's Victim Assistance Program, resources and instructions for accessing the Victim Notification System (VNS). VNS is designed to provide you with information regarding the status of your case.
+
+This case is currently under investigation. This can be a lengthy process and we request your continued patience while we conduct a thorough investigation.
+
+As a crime victim, you have the following rights under 18 United States Code § 3771: (1) The right to be reasonably protected from the accused; (2) The right to reasonable, accurate, and timely notice of any public court proceeding, or any parole proceeding, involving the crime or of any release or escape of the accused; (3) The right not to be excluded from any such public court proceeding, unless the court, after receiving clear and convincing evidence, determines that testimony by the victim would be materially altered if the victim heard other testimony at that proceeding; (4) The right to be reasonably heard at any public proceeding in the district court involving release, plea, sentencing, or any parole proceeding; (5) The reasonable right to confer with the attorney for the Government in the case; (6) The right to full and timely restitution as provided in law; (7) The right to proceedings free from unreasonable delay; (8) The right to be treated with fairness and with respect for the victim's dignity and privacy.
+
+We will make our best efforts to ensure you are accorded the rights described. Most of these rights pertain to events occurring after the arrest or indictment of an individual for the crime, and it will become the responsibility of the prosecuting United States Attorney's Office to ensure you are accorded those rights. You may also seek the advice of a private attorney with respect to these rights.
+
+The Victim Notification System (VNS) is designed to provide you with direct information regarding the case as it proceeds through the criminal justice system. You may obtain current information about this matter on the Internet at WWW.Notify.USDOJ.GOV or from the VNS Call Center at 1-866-DOJ-4YOU (1-866-365-4968) (TDD/TTY: 1-866-228-4619) (International: 1-502-213-2767). In addition, you may use the Call Center or Internet to update your contact information and/or change your decision about participation in the notification program. If you update your information to include a current email address, VNS will send information to that address. You will need the following Victim Identification Number (VIN) '2074381' and Personal Identification Number (PIN) '1815' anytime you contact the Call Center and the first time you log on to VNS on the Internet. In addition, the first time you access the VNS Internet site, you will be prompted to enter your last name (or business name) as currently contained in VNS. The name you should enter is [REDACTED]
+
+[REDACTED]
+
+[REDACTED]
+
+• It you have additional questions which Involve this matter, please canted the office listed above. When you call, please provide the tie number located at the lop of this letter. Please remember, your participation in the notification part of this program le voluntary. In order to continue to receive nottficallOne, tt is your responsibility to keep your contact information current.
+
+Sincerely,
+
+2...':-a)
+
+Twle Victimrecalist
+
+![](_page_18_Picture_1.jpeg)
+
+U.S. Department of Justice •
+
+United States Attorney Southern District of Florida
+
+| ADMINISTRATION                |  |
+|-------------------------------|--|
+| <b>GOVERNMENT<br/>EXHIBIT</b> |  |
+| CASE<br>NO. 08-80736-CV-MARRA |  |
+| EXHIBIT<br>NO. 6              |  |
+
+500 South Australian Ave.. Suite 400 West Palm Beailt FL 33401 (561)8204711 Facsimile: (561) 820-8777
+
+July 9, 2008
+
+## VIA FACSIMILE
+
+Brad l= Esq. The Law Offices of Brad IM& Associates, LLC 2028 Street, Suite 202 Hollywood, Florida 33020.
+
+> Re: lefliSsighQPIIIIIIIRIP I / At NOTIFICATION OF IDENTIFIED VICTIM
+
+Dear Mr. a
+
+By virtue of this letter, the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida asks that you provide the following notice to your client, Calk Wit
+
+On June 30, 2008, Jeffrey Epstein (hereinafter referred to as "Epstein) entered a plea of guilty to violations of Florida Statutes Sections 796.07 (felony solicitation of prostitution) and 796.03 (procurement of minors to engage in prostitution), in the 15th Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County (Case Nos. 2006-cf-009454AXXXMB and 2008-cf-00938 1 AXXXMB) and was sentenced to a term of twelve months' imprisonment to be followed by an additional six months' imprisonment, followed by twelve months of Community Control 1, with conditions of community confinement imposed by the Court.
+
+In light of the entry of the guilty plea and sentence, the United States has agreed to defeiriedefirpfbilaiitiiiii-irfaVOrtif this state- plea-and sentence; subject to certain conditions.
+
+One such condition to which Epstein has agreed is the following:
+
+"Any person, who while a minor, was a victim of a violation of an offense enumerated in Title 18, United StatesCode, Section 2255, will have the same rights to proceed under Section 2255 as she would have had, if Mr. Epstein
+
+BRAD [REDACTED] ESQ.  
+NOTIFICATION OF IDENTIFIED VICTIM C [REDACTED] W [REDACTED]  
+JULY 9, 2008  
+PAGE 2 OF 2
+
+had been tried federally and convicted of an enumerated offense. For purposes of implementing this paragraph, the United States shall provide Mr. Epstein's attorneys with a list of individuals whom it was prepared to name in an Indictment as victims of an enumerated offense by Mr. Epstein. Any judicial authority interpreting this provision, including any authority determining which evidentiary burdens if any a plaintiff must meet, shall consider that it is the intent of the parties to place these identified victims in the same position as they would have been had Mr. Epstein been convicted at trial. No more; no less."
+
+Through this letter, this Office hereby provides Notice that your client, C [REDACTED] W [REDACTED] is an individual whom the United States was prepared to name as a victim of an enumerated offense.
+
+Should your client decide to file a claim against Jeffrey Epstein, his attorney, Jack Goldberger, asks that you contact him at Atterbury Goldberger and Weiss, 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401, (561) 659-8300.
+
+Please understand that neither the U.S. Attorney's Office nor the Federal Bureau of Investigation can take part in or otherwise assist in civil litigation; however, if you do file a claim under 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and Mr. Epstein denies that your client is a victim of an enumerated offense, please provide notice of that denial to the undersigned.
+
+Please thank your client for all of her assistance during the course of this examination and express the heartfelt regards of myself and Special Agents Kuyrkendall and Richards for the health and well-being of Ms. W [REDACTED]
+
+R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA  
+UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
+
+![]()cc: Jack Goldberger, Esq.
+
+![](_page_20_Picture_1.jpeg)
+
+U.S. Department of Justice
+
+United States Attorney Southern District of Florida
+
+![A small rectangular label with a black border. It contains the text 'ADMIN-C' at the top, 'GOVERNMENT EXHIBIT' in large black capital letters in the middle, and 'CASE NO. 08-80736-CV-MARRA' at the bottom. Below the 'CASE' and 'NO.' are the words 'EXHIBIT' and '7'.]()500 South Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (560 820-8711 Facsimile: (561) 820-8777
+
+July 9, 2008
+
+VIA FACSIMILE
+
+BrTiargq.
+
+The Law Offices of Brad Associates, LLC
+
+2028a Street, Suite 202 .
+
+Hollywood, Florida 33020.
+
+Re: Jeffrey E steitalalt IS NOTIFICATION OF IDENTIFIED VICTIM
+
+Dear Mr.
+
+By virtue of this letter, the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida asks that you provide the following notice to your client, an ROM
+
+On June 30, 2008, Jeffrey Epstein (hereinafter referred to as "Epstein) entered a plea of guilty to violations of Florida Statutes Sections 796.07 (felony solicitation of prostitution) and 796.03 (procurement of minors to engage in prostitution), in the 15th Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County (Case Nos. 2006-cf-009454AXXXMB and 2008-cf-009381AXXXMB) and was sentenced to a term of twelve months' imprisonment to be followed by an additional six months' imprisonment, followed by twelve months of Community Control I, with conditions of community confinement imposed by the Court.
+
+In light of the entry of the guilty plea and sentence, the United States has agreed to .defer\_federal\_prosecution\_in\_famor\_oLthis..state plea and sentence; subject to certain conditions.
+
+One such condition to which Epstein has agreed is the following:
+
+"Any person, who while a minor, was a victim of a violation of an offense enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, will have the same rights to proceed under Section 2255 as she would have had, if Mr. Epstein
+
+BRA'., ESQ.
+
+NOTIFICATION OF IDENTIFIED VICTIM Sea
+
+JULY 9, 2008
+
+PAGE 2 OF 2
+
+had been tried federally and convicted of an enumerated offense. For purposes of implementing this paragraph, the United States shall provide Mr. Epstein's attorneys with a list of individuals whom it was prepared to name in an Indictment as victims of an enumerated offense by Mr. Epstein. Any judicial authority interpreting this provision, including any authority determining which evidentiary burdens if any a plaintiff must meet, shall consider that it is the intent of the parties to place these identified victims in the same position as they would have been had Mr. Epstein been convicted at trial. No more; no less."
+
+Through this letter, this Office hereby provides Notice that your client, Sa. P is an individual whom the United States was prepared to name as a victim of an enumerated offense.
+
+Should your client decide to file a claim against Jeffrey Epstein, his attorney, Jack Goldberger, asks that you contact him at Atterbury Goldberger and Weiss, 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401, (561) 659-8300.
+
+Please understand that neither the U.S. Attorney's Office nor the Federal Bureau of Investigation can take part in or otherwise assist in civil litigation; however, if you do file a claim under 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and Mr. Epstein denies that your client is a victim of an enumerated offense, please provide notice of that denial to the undersigned.
+
+Please thank your client for all of her assistance during the course of this examination and express the heartfelt regards of myself and Special Agents Kuyrkendall and Richards for the health and well-being of Ms. lap
+
+> R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
+
+By:
+
+cc: Jack Goldberger, Esq.
+
+A. VILLAFARA ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739325/EFTA02739325.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739325/EFTA02739325.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fff73ddd5658f50c10f6ba2a4c028df308141aa2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739325/EFTA02739325.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,1042 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739325.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 22,
+  "chars": 35831,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 19.6,
+  "image_assets": [
+    "_page_8_Picture_3.jpeg",
+    "_page_8_Picture_6.jpeg",
+    "_page_10_Picture_2.jpeg",
+    "_page_10_Picture_5.jpeg",
+    "_page_12_Picture_1.jpeg",
+    "_page_12_Picture_11.jpeg",
+    "_page_14_Picture_1.jpeg",
+    "_page_14_Picture_12.jpeg",
+    "_page_16_Picture_733.jpeg",
+    "_page_16_Picture_735.jpeg",
+    "_page_18_Picture_1.jpeg",
+    "_page_20_Picture_1.jpeg"
+  ],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "EXHIBIT A",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            189.10000000000002,
+            317.2745056152344
+          ],
+          [
+            387.891845703125,
+            317.2745056152344
+          ],
+          [
+            387.891845703125,
+            358.4425964355469
+          ],
+          [
+            189.10000000000002,
+            358.4425964355469
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "DECLARATION OF A. VILLAFARA \nIN SUPPORT OF UNITED STATES' RESPONSE \nTO VICTIM'S EMERGENCY PETITION FOR ENFORCEMENT \nOF CRIME VICTIM RIGHTS ACT, 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 3771",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            104.31000000000003,
+            315.9
+          ],
+          [
+            455.0398254394531,
+            315.9
+          ],
+          [
+            455.0398254394531,
+            375.84000000000003
+          ],
+          [
+            104.31000000000003,
+            375.84000000000003
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            173.85,
+            128.79
+          ],
+          [
+            382.8636169433594,
+            128.79
+          ],
+          [
+            382.8636169433594,
+            159.57000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            173.85,
+            159.57000000000002
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "DELIVERY BY HAND",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            57.95,
+            221.13000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            164.9286651611328,
+            221.13000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            164.9286651611328,
+            234.09
+          ],
+          [
+            57.95,
+            234.09
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "U.S. Department of Justice",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            279.38000000000005,
+            52.650000000000006
+          ],
+          [
+            406.7337646484375,
+            52.650000000000006
+          ],
+          [
+            406.7337646484375,
+            66.77288818359375
+          ],
+          [
+            279.38000000000005,
+            66.77288818359375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "U.S. Department of Justice",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 10,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            275.72,
+            46.17
+          ],
+          [
+            401.04266357421875,
+            46.17
+          ],
+          [
+            401.04266357421875,
+            60.46435546875
+          ],
+          [
+            275.72,
+            60.46435546875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "DELIVERY BY HAND",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 10,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            54.900000000000006,
+            213.84
+          ],
+          [
+            160.76483154296875,
+            213.84
+          ],
+          [
+            160.76483154296875,
+            226.245849609375
+          ],
+          [
+            54.900000000000006,
+            226.245849609375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "VIA FACSIMILE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 18,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            57.95,
+            243.81
+          ],
+          [
+            150.98233032226562,
+            243.81
+          ],
+          [
+            150.98233032226562,
+            259.92852783203125
+          ],
+          [
+            57.95,
+            259.92852783203125
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            261
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            9
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            360
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            332
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            57
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            29
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            306
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            22
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            324
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            24
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            136
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            404
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            40
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            9
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "Picture",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 9,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            245
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 10,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            404
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            39
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            9
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "Picture",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 11,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            241
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            24
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 12,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            543
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            40
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            9
+          ],
+          [
+            "Picture",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 13,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            112
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 14,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            555
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            45
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            11
+          ],
+          [
+            "Picture",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 15,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            109
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            13
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 16,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            662
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            49
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "Picture",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 17,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            29
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 18,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            86
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            42
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Picture",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Form",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 19,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            75
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            36
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            23
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 20,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            91
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            43
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            16
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Picture",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Form",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 21,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            77
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            36
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            14
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739325"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739325/_page_10_Picture_2.jpeg b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739325/_page_10_Picture_2.jpeg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9530e6dd03817dc7ee39700b3f95664f6c1da1c9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739325/_page_10_Picture_2.jpeg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:afcb0efbbe10aa8f413c0ef49fe1db714cd7b61c4f397afffeb6eadae5b1c038
+size 9440
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739325/_page_10_Picture_5.jpeg b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739325/_page_10_Picture_5.jpeg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..269d273aadb640ab45e26afc083c069a31e79ee7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739325/_page_10_Picture_5.jpeg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:809c8ba7d62352546d85344569892a5096a77d0051cb1b637f5f6ee7e8cf8b38
+size 19740
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739325/_page_12_Picture_1.jpeg b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739325/_page_12_Picture_1.jpeg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fd9e33dc65a4e2ea2eab57fd9bebfa21df4068f5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739325/_page_12_Picture_1.jpeg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:722bd86e9bf53a98d29558489919bd53f583deb8e90bf786ecc2b79c5991bf04
+size 5145
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739325/_page_12_Picture_11.jpeg b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739325/_page_12_Picture_11.jpeg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..efae7e5d6a72f8dd9b6361bf8e69a0482278df83
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739325/_page_12_Picture_11.jpeg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:1d3f7d0daffd1bf8c81db674cb4bc614faf39ee4e39614cef7f48eb3e120a077
+size 21794
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739325/_page_14_Picture_1.jpeg b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739325/_page_14_Picture_1.jpeg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..56ceaabaa126f1c03cda3ed79f074fc66908c335
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739325/_page_14_Picture_1.jpeg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:6957adcf67e32e07235974305d9012e00b14c6d9fd33c002b6df7af1b7161f69
+size 5279
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739325/_page_14_Picture_12.jpeg b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739325/_page_14_Picture_12.jpeg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..66b357af39feb8200df27617ef9792819b33f3e8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739325/_page_14_Picture_12.jpeg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:e9118544bee9f8748a701f59ddad88ec08df52d871c3a673d0688403bbe2d49b
+size 21292
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739325/_page_16_Picture_733.jpeg b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739325/_page_16_Picture_733.jpeg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..91d8ecfb4e25cb6516c38fa4b5d1cb74d01820ae
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739325/_page_16_Picture_733.jpeg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:867e354f1d3ee811f0993cc7a94146b6a8320223b1be2e5cffde9a95d228982f
+size 5317
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739325/_page_16_Picture_735.jpeg b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739325/_page_16_Picture_735.jpeg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c3b3618c420d2d6897a85d24dd05a7baa64f7325
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739325/_page_16_Picture_735.jpeg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:8d8d25f55169e167da94a9eda2d3077833ac144fead37bf1295e5eadb6da01e5
+size 21332
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739325/_page_18_Picture_1.jpeg b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739325/_page_18_Picture_1.jpeg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..86524518c5e3d2bca588c319d07872fb85b42e4a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739325/_page_18_Picture_1.jpeg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:738f8ab47e933f5bfac3205501bdf4412d6e793cbab8764623f7d66659171de5
+size 10023
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739325/_page_20_Picture_1.jpeg b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739325/_page_20_Picture_1.jpeg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fcd0516bbd568ba47ef6231a1f64dde81be40f5d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739325/_page_20_Picture_1.jpeg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:82fd3c2265b49e8c3c7dcabd5b8e089193c7d289235104c74cd576449e9d7600
+size 10184
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739325/_page_8_Picture_3.jpeg b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739325/_page_8_Picture_3.jpeg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c505eed0719c4c24be940ea4c2ee879c74fc6f24
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739325/_page_8_Picture_3.jpeg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:032d1975a07687a458668c22937dd69a670a16a42e92c1c0d7b289d37d292f04
+size 9760
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739325/_page_8_Picture_6.jpeg b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739325/_page_8_Picture_6.jpeg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a003a6ad824b8fd391b3fb3537f39aa608998c68
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739325/_page_8_Picture_6.jpeg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:3f586bddcd0b84eaa50d01d01c386ae4095b1f37c10715377dc718c578ba9c60
+size 19916
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739347/EFTA02739347.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739347/EFTA02739347.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d5a27a87e8544a97d57e16176ef17adee2470b66
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739347/EFTA02739347.md
@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
+# EXHIBIT B
+
+18 U.S.C.A. § 1595 Page 1
+
+![](_page_1_Picture_4.jpeg)
+
+Effective: December 19, 2003
+
+# United States Code Annotated Currentness
+
+Title 18. Crimes and Criminal Procedure (Refs & Annos)
+
+rill Part I. Crimes (Refs & Annos)
+
+ctil Chapter 77. Peonage, Slavery, and Trafficking in Persons (Refs & Annos)
+
+-• § 1595. Civil remedy
+
+(a) An individual who is a victim of a violation of section 1589, 1590, or 1591 of this chapter may bring a civil action against the perpetrator in an appropriate district court of the United States and may recover damages and reasonable attorneys fees.
+
+(bX1) Any civil action filed under this section shall be stayed during the pendency of any criminal action arising out of the same occurrence in which the claimant is the victim.
+
+(2) In this subsection, a "criminal action" includes investigation and prosecution and is , pending until final adjudication in the trial court-
+
+#### CREDIT(S)
+
+(Added Pub.L. 108-193, § 4(aX4XA), Dec. 19, 2003, 117 Stat. 2878.)
+
+# HISTORICAL AND STATUTORY NOTES
+
+### Revision Notes and Legislative Reports
+
+2003 Acts. House Report No. 108-264(Parts I and II), see 2003 U.S. Code Cong. and Adm. News, p. 2408.
+
+## LIBRARY REFERENCES
+
+# American Digest System
+
+Action E:=. 5.
+
+Torts €=:, 1.
+
+Key Number System Topic Nos. 13, 379.
+
+#### RESEARCH REFERENCES
+
+#### Encyclopedias
+
+Am. Jur. 2d Involuntary Servitude and Peonage § 12, Federal Statutes Outlawing Slave Trade; Actions on Vessels in Slave Trade.
+
+Am. Jur. 2d Involuntary Servitude and Peonage § 20, Remedies.
+
+O 2008 Thomson Reuters/West. No Claim to Orig. U.S. Govt. Works.
+
+18 U.S.C.A. § 1595, 18 USCA § 1595
+
+Current through P.L. 110.282 (excluding P.L. 110-234, 110-246, and 110-275) approved 7-23.08
+
+Copr. (C) 2008 Thomson Reuters/West. No Claim to Orig. U.S. Govt. Works
+
+END OF DOCUMENT
+
+O 2008 Thomson Reuters/West. No Claim to Orig. U.S. Govt. Works.
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739347/EFTA02739347.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739347/EFTA02739347.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8e59b3543167ab48d27814abed9855b56c89dbb6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739347/EFTA02739347.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,344 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739347.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 3,
+  "chars": 1890,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.44,
+  "image_assets": [
+    "_page_1_Picture_4.jpeg"
+  ],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "EXHIBIT B",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            192.76000000000002,
+            316.4031066894531
+          ],
+          [
+            391.711669921875,
+            316.4031066894531
+          ],
+          [
+            391.711669921875,
+            358.1890869140625
+          ],
+          [
+            192.76000000000002,
+            358.1890869140625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "United States Code Annotated Currentness",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            65.27000000000001,
+            162.0
+          ],
+          [
+            239.28929138183594,
+            162.0
+          ],
+          [
+            239.28929138183594,
+            177.339599609375
+          ],
+          [
+            65.27000000000001,
+            177.339599609375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CREDIT(S)",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            64.05,
+            364.5
+          ],
+          [
+            116.34766387939453,
+            364.5
+          ],
+          [
+            116.34766387939453,
+            379.0895690917969
+          ],
+          [
+            64.05,
+            379.0895690917969
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "HISTORICAL AND STATUTORY NOTES",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            64.05,
+            409.04999999999995
+          ],
+          [
+            244.7783966064453,
+            409.04999999999995
+          ],
+          [
+            244.7783966064453,
+            424.0895690917969
+          ],
+          [
+            64.05,
+            424.0895690917969
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Revision Notes and Legislative Reports",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            64.05,
+            431.73
+          ],
+          [
+            223.5392608642578,
+            431.73
+          ],
+          [
+            223.5392608642578,
+            446.5895690917969
+          ],
+          [
+            64.05,
+            446.5895690917969
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "LIBRARY REFERENCES",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            62.83,
+            476.28
+          ],
+          [
+            174.26669311523438,
+            476.28
+          ],
+          [
+            174.26669311523438,
+            491.2195739746094
+          ],
+          [
+            62.83,
+            491.2195739746094
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "American Digest System",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            62.83,
+            498.96
+          ],
+          [
+            164.76138305664062,
+            498.96
+          ],
+          [
+            164.76138305664062,
+            514.0895690917969
+          ],
+          [
+            62.83,
+            514.0895690917969
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "RESEARCH REFERENCES",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            62.83,
+            566.1899999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            181.38722229003906,
+            566.1899999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            181.38722229003906,
+            580.8395690917969
+          ],
+          [
+            62.83,
+            580.8395690917969
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Encyclopedias",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            62.83,
+            588.87
+          ],
+          [
+            123.76834869384766,
+            588.87
+          ],
+          [
+            123.76834869384766,
+            602.9595642089844
+          ],
+          [
+            62.83,
+            602.9595642089844
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            63
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            33
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            19
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Picture",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            17
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            9
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739347"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739347/_page_1_Picture_4.jpeg b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739347/_page_1_Picture_4.jpeg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..90f0f05dcd5e12882370d1ecac2825640286902e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739347/_page_1_Picture_4.jpeg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:98481fdba4a3736bd04098cebf0962c803000d1b05b5d5a1e35c84aa56e2d36b
+size 863
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739350/EFTA02739350.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739350/EFTA02739350.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..346f596021ab94fa70a4303f4459c57f81273c32
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739350/EFTA02739350.md
@@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-80119-CIV-KAM-LRJ
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-80232-CIV-KAM-LRJ
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 4, CASE NO.: 08-80380-CIV-KAM-LRJ
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 5, CASE NO.: 08-80381-CIV-KAM-LRJ
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN.
+
+## DEFENDANT'S NOTICE OF FILING EXHIBITS
+
+Defendant Jeffrey Epstein hereby files the following two exhibits to his Reply in Suppo►t **of Motion to Stay, filed under seal on July 28, 2008:** 
+
+- **A. Exhibit "A" is the July 9, 2008 Declaration of Assistant United States Attorney Ann** 
+  - **C. Villafana, previously filed by the United States in** In re: Jane Doe, Case No. 08- 80736-CIV-Marra (S.D. Ha.) (DE 14).
+
+![](_page_0_Picture_21.jpeg)
+
+B. Exhibit "B" is a copy of Title 18, United States Code, section 1595.
+
+These exhibits were inadvertently omitted from the reply memorandum.
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+TEIN, P.L. 3059 Grand Avenue, Suite 340 Coconut Grove, Florida 33133 Tel: 305 442 1101 Fax: 305 442 6744
+
+By: Is/ Michael R. Tein GUY A. Fla. Bar No. 623740
+
+> MICHAEL R. TEIN Fla. Bar No. 993522 tein@lewistein.com
+
+ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER & WEISS, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Tel. 561 659 8300 Fax. 561 835 8691
+
+By: Jack A. Goldberger Ha. Bar No. 262013 jgoldberger@agwpa.com
+
+Attorneys for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
+
+## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
+
+I HEREBY CERTIFY that on July 29, 2007, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record on the attached service list by transmission of Notice of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF.
+
+Isl Michael R. Tein
+
+2
+
+## SERVICE LIST
+
+Jeffrey M. Herman, Esq.
+
+Stuart S. Mcrmelstein, Esq.
+
+Adam D. Horowitz, Esq.
+
+Herman & Mennelstein, P.A.
+
+18205 Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 2218
+
+Miami, Florida 33160
+
+![](_page_2_Picture_9.jpeg)
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739350/EFTA02739350.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739350/EFTA02739350.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0df808916c168e3d28c51b1af5175d5f5f276f39
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739350/EFTA02739350.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,250 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739350.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 3,
+  "chars": 2006,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.27,
+  "image_assets": [
+    "_page_0_Picture_21.jpeg",
+    "_page_2_Picture_9.jpeg"
+  ],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            405.95098876953125,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            405.95098876953125,
+            100.10302734375
+          ],
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            100.10302734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "DEFENDANT'S NOTICE OF FILING EXHIBITS",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            171.972,
+            526.5
+          ],
+          [
+            440.53460693359375,
+            526.5
+          ],
+          [
+            440.53460693359375,
+            542.2330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            171.972,
+            542.2330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            222.768,
+            512.73
+          ],
+          [
+            388.94989013671875,
+            512.73
+          ],
+          [
+            388.94989013671875,
+            527.60302734375
+          ],
+          [
+            222.768,
+            527.60302734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "SERVICE LIST",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            260.712,
+            69.66
+          ],
+          [
+            351.0904846191406,
+            69.66
+          ],
+          [
+            351.0904846191406,
+            86.103515625
+          ],
+          [
+            260.712,
+            86.103515625
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            52
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            17
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Picture",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            64
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            32
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            14
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            13
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Picture",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739350"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739350/_page_0_Picture_21.jpeg b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739350/_page_0_Picture_21.jpeg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d015aa44e01536bfcc3adb26f75b1a548d82a027
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739350/_page_0_Picture_21.jpeg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:49fd2325286b005cffc3bda662f52b0eb422fbc8c37ce58023b722903b1587b5
+size 2488
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739350/_page_2_Picture_9.jpeg b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739350/_page_2_Picture_9.jpeg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fc47b8c97863c99da005f4d6ac12f060ba32610c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739350/_page_2_Picture_9.jpeg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:78e112994194fe7d4f2bc80b2890f08bdb95b32f3a0487eb01ba5d7867d497dc
+size 2313
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739353/EFTA02739353.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739353/EFTA02739353.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..72fd0abcfde73bb7b64ce0394567e89f28e44ad4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739353/EFTA02739353.md
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-80119-CIV-KAM-LRJ
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-80232-CIV-KAM-LRJ
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 4, CASE NO.: 08-80380-CIV-KAM-LRJ
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 5, CASE NO.: 08-80381-CIV-KAM-LRJ
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN.
+
+## WAIVER OF SERVICE
+
+Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d) and in response to this Court's Orders entered July 25, 2008, defendant Jeffrey Epstein hereby waives formal service of a summons and complaint and will accept delivery by mail or by hand at the below-listed address of his counsel, Tein, P.L.
+
+![](_page_0_Picture_20.jpeg)
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+TEIN, P.L. 3059 Grand Avenue, Suite 340 Coconut Grove, Florida 33133 Tel: 305 442 1101 Fax: 305 442 6744
+
+By: s/ Michael R. Tein GUY A. Fla. Bar No. 623740 MICHAEL R. TEIN Ha. Bar No. 993522 tein@lewistein.com
+
+ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER & WEISS, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Tel. 561 659 8300 Fax. 561 835 8691
+
+By: Jack A. Goldberger Ha. Bar No. 262013 jgoldberger@agwpa.com
+
+Attorneys for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
+
+![](_page_1_Picture_8.jpeg)
+
+## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
+
+I HEREBY CERTIFY that on July 30, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record listed below via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF.
+
+Jeffrey M. Herman, Esq. Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Herman & Mermelstein, P.A. 18205 Biscayne Blvd, Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160 Fax: 305 931 0877
+
+> /s/ Michael R. Tein Michael R. Tein
+
+![](_page_2_Picture_6.jpeg)
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739353/EFTA02739353.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739353/EFTA02739353.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e6bc1a2cc7f1fdf54bc568bea9ace235b41a5124
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739353/EFTA02739353.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,220 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739353.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 3,
+  "chars": 1758,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.19,
+  "image_assets": [
+    "_page_0_Picture_20.jpeg",
+    "_page_1_Picture_8.jpeg",
+    "_page_2_Picture_6.jpeg"
+  ],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            405.95098876953125,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            405.95098876953125,
+            100.10302734375
+          ],
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            100.10302734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "WAIVER OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            240.516,
+            512.73
+          ],
+          [
+            372.3902587890625,
+            512.73
+          ],
+          [
+            372.3902587890625,
+            527.9830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            240.516,
+            527.9830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            223.38,
+            97.19999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            388.94989013671875,
+            97.19999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            388.94989013671875,
+            112.10302734375
+          ],
+          [
+            223.38,
+            112.10302734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            47
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            23
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            18
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Picture",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            52
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Picture",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            37
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            19
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Picture",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739353"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739353/_page_0_Picture_20.jpeg b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739353/_page_0_Picture_20.jpeg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..46161b7d35ad9b33234c46dbb1318ef1b0438410
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739353/_page_0_Picture_20.jpeg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:94f8cd1d1ddcd4d0fc308023f3ab93267bccafe6e38a6f683d3fe93d66a84b3a
+size 2195
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739353/_page_1_Picture_8.jpeg b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739353/_page_1_Picture_8.jpeg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2ea3b21d9ad29eed91dd9061579204b753c7b66b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739353/_page_1_Picture_8.jpeg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:18a800eb31a8450803cccc2b628a208f1de4def0fd18f9270ef80e301119fb8f
+size 2510
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739353/_page_2_Picture_6.jpeg b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739353/_page_2_Picture_6.jpeg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..18b694350a2db5290eea9a4229216b3b3755d49b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739353/_page_2_Picture_6.jpeg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:334b9d68dd714b3d958e4a29af75b66ab99861c7c18c0846b7fd802c85aa2659
+size 2452
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739356/EFTA02739356.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739356/EFTA02739356.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..aa86ac3b6682270e789db0bc58ae97777706341f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739356/EFTA02739356.md
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+NO. 08-80232-CIV-MARla
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+v.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SEAL
+
+THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to File Under Seal, filed July 28, 2008. Defendant seeks to file his reply to his Motion to Stay under seal.' The Court has carefully considered the motion and the record and is otherwise fully advised in the premises.
+
+As the Court has previously explained to the parties, the Local Rules for the Southern District of Florida state that "proceedings in the United States District Court are public and Court filings are matters of public record." S.D. Fla. L.R. 5.4(A). It is well settled that the media and the public in general possess a common-law right to inspect and copy judicial records. See Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 (1978). "The right to inspect and copy records is not absolute, however. As with other forms of access, it may interfere with the administration of justice and hence may have to be curtailed." v. Graddick, 696 F.2d
+
+<sup>&#</sup>x27;The parties are reminded that all documents filed conventionally (including those filed under seal) must be filed with the Clerk's Office in West Palm Beach, Florida.
+
+796, 803 (11th Cir.1983). This right of access creates a presumption in favor of openness of court records, which "must be balanced against any competing interest advanced." United States v. Noriega, 752 F. Supp. 1037, 1040 (S.D. Fla.1990). For example, courts may look to see whether the records sought are for illegitimate purposes. 696 F.2d at 803. Likewise, the Court may consider whether "the press has already been permitted substantial access to the contents of the records." Id.
+
+In his motion to seal, Defendant states that he seeks to file this document under seal "to comply with the confidentiality clause" in the agreement between Defendant and the U.S. Attorney cited in his brief. (Del. Mot. 2.) The Court is familiar with the U.S. Attorney's objections to unsealing any part of the agreement, see In re: Jane Doe, No. 08-80736-C1V (S.D. Fla. July 11, 2008). However, as the Court has previously held, the U.S. Attorney's objections do not outweigh the public interest in having access to court records. Further, the details of the agreement contained in Defendant's Reply brief have, in large part, already been unsealed and released to the public. The Court finds no justification to keep these documents under seal.
+
+Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendant's Motion to File Under Seal is DENIED. The Clerk shall UNSEAL docket entries 24 and 25 and make them available for public inspection through CM/ECF at the earliest possible time.
+
+DONE AND ORDERED in at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 4'h day of August, 2008.
+
+> KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge
+
+Copies furnished to: all counsel of record
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739356/EFTA02739356.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739356/EFTA02739356.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5397ea70a66f82cbd763da24255400d3138e028d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739356/EFTA02739356.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,147 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739356.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 2,
+  "chars": 2970,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 0.79,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            405.5581359863281,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            405.5581359863281,
+            100.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            100.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SEAL",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            197.06400000000002,
+            298.08
+          ],
+          [
+            415.5150451660156,
+            298.08
+          ],
+          [
+            415.5150451660156,
+            313.18353271484375
+          ],
+          [
+            197.06400000000002,
+            313.18353271484375
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            55
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739356"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739358/EFTA02739358.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739358/EFTA02739358.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..df80246857cf41b465ee798d95dcf1741b7303de
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739358/EFTA02739358.md
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+NO.08-80232-CIV-MARRA/
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+v.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STAY
+
+THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Stay (DE 8), filed June 20, 2008. The motion is now fully briefed and is ripe for review. The Court has carefully considered the motion and is otherwise fully advised in the premises.
+
+Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Defendant") seeks a stay of this civil action under a federal statute which reads, in pertinent part, as follows:
+
+> If, at any time that a cause of action for recovery of compensation for damage or injury to the person of a child exists, a criminal action is pending which arises out of the same occurrence and in which the child is the victim, the civil action shall be stayed until the end of all phases of the criminal action and any mention of the civil action during the criminal proceeding is prohibited. As used in this subsection, a criminal action is pending until its final adjudication in the trial court.
+
+18 U.S.C. § 3509 (k). In his motion, Defendant cites a state case, Florida v. Epstein, No. 2006
+
+CF 09454AXX (Fla. Cir. Ct. 2008)' and a federal case, In re Grand Jury, No. FGJ 07-I03(WPB) (S.D. Fla.), that arise out of the same occurrences and are pending and thus require a stay of this civil case. The federal "case," according to Defendant, involves a "deferred-prosecution" agreement whereby the U.S. Attorney agreed to suspend its investigation of Defendant while "retaining the right to reactivate the grand jury." (DE 19.) Defendant essentially reasons, because the U.S. Attorney could bring criminal charges against Defendant, that a criminal action is "pending." The Court rejects this definition of a "pending criminal action."
+
+When interpreting the text of a statute, the Court begins with the plain meaning of the text. In re=, 524 F.3d 1175, 1186 (1Ith Cir. 2008). If the plain meaning of a statute is clear, the Court should not deviate from that interpretation. Id. Pending is defined as "remaining undecided" and "awaiting decision." Blacks Law Dictionary (8th ed. 2004).2 Likewise, an
+
+<sup>&#</sup>x27;As Defendant recognizes, the state court case was "finally adjudicated" and thus no longer pending as of June 30, 2008. (See DE II.)
+
+<sup>&#</sup>x27;Defendant attempts to argue that the fact that grand jury subpoenas are still &quot;outstanding&quot; and &quot;not withdrawn&quot; and that the grand jury will not be dismissed until Defendant completes his obligations under the state plea agreement means that a &quot;criminal action&quot; is &quot;pending.&quot; (Def. Reply 4.) Defendant misunderstands the purpose of a grand jury. A grand jury, as Blackstone writes, is composed of citizens who &quot;inquire, upon their oaths, whether there be sufficient cause to call upon the party to answer&quot; the charge of criminal activity. Beavers v. Henkel, 194 U.S. 73, 84 (1904) (quoting William Blackstone, 4 Commentaries \*303). The grand jury&#x27;s sole purpose is to inquire into whether there is probable cause to bring an individual before a tribunal to determine his guilt or innocence of an alleged crime. Id. The grand jury is simply an investigative body. See U.S. v. Aired, 144, F.3d 1405, 1413 (11th Cir. 1998). A &quot;criminal action&quot; is not instigated by the calling of a grand jury, because a grand jury is convened &quot;to determine whether a crime has been committed and whether criminal proceedings should be instituted against any person.&quot; U.S. v. Calandra, 414 U.S. 338, 344 (1974). An &quot;action&quot; is commenced against a person after the grand jury actually finds probable cause to make an individual answer specific charges and renders a bill of indictment against that individual. Until a grand jury&#x27;s investigation is complete and there has been a determination by a lawful authority that probable cause exists, there can be no criminal action.</p><p block-type='Text'>&quot;action&quot; is defined as a &quot;criminal judicial proceeding.&quot; Id. Because the U.S. Attorney has not filed an indictment or an information against Defendant, the Court fails to see how there is an undecided judicial proceeding in federal court against Defendant.</p><p block-type='Text'>Defendant argues that this statute should be read to include the definition of &quot;criminal action&quot; used in 18 U.S.C. § 1595(bX2), which reads as follows: &quot;In this subsection, a `criminal action&#x27; includes investigation and prosecution and is pending until final adjudication in the trial court.&quot; Defendant argues that &quot;Congress specifically intended that the term &#x27;criminal action&#x27; would be applied extremely broadly&quot; under § 1595, so Congress &quot;took pains to ensure that courts would give it the broadest possible construction&quot; and defined &quot;criminal action&quot; as including investigatory stages. (Def. Reply 4.) Defendants argue that the Court should borrow this definition.</p><p block-type='Text'>The Court disagrees. The Court believes that Congress&#x27;s inclusion of this broader definition under § 1595 evinces Congressional intent to depart from the normal meaning of the term &quot;criminal action.&quot;&#x27; This addition to the text suggests that Congress knows the plain meaning of the term &quot;criminal action&quot; and that Congress decided, under § 1595, that the definition of &quot;criminal action&quot; should be broader. In contrast, Congress could have made such an addition to § 3509 had it intended the mandatory stay provision to apply to pre-indictment investigations, but it did not. In other words, by not broadening the definition of &quot;criminal action&quot; § 3509, Congress intended that the term should only have its ordinary meaning: that an indictment or information has been filed naming a specific defendant. Instead, it seems clear that</p><p><sup>&#</sup>x27;In fact, Congress made this intent clear by stating that this broader definition of a &quot;criminal action&quot; applied only &quot;in this subsection.&quot;</p><p block-type='Text'>Congress intended that these two statutory provisions should each have a different scope.</p><p block-type='Text'>Defendant&#x27;s argument of statutory construction fails.</p><p block-type='Text'>The single case cited by Defendant in support of his motion is not on point. In Doe 1 v. Francis, No. 5:03CV260/MCR/WCS, 2005 WL 517847 (N.D. Fla. Feb. 10, 2005), the stay was entered because criminal charges had been filed against the defendant in a state court several months earlier (i.e., the defendants had been indicted by the state attorney). See Memorandum in Support of Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Outcome of Parallel Criminal Proceedings at 3, Doe I v. Francis, No. 5:03CV260/MCR/WCS (N.D. Fla. Dec. 2, 2003). The Court agrees with Defendant that a stay under § 3509(k) is mandatory when a criminal action is pending; the Court simply disagrees that the &quot;deferred-prosecution agreement&quot; constitutes a pending criminal action.</p><p block-type='Text'>The Court also does not believe a discretionary stay is warranted. Defendant did not seek this relief in his motion; including such a request in the reply brief is inappropriate. Further, the Court sees no reason to delay this litigation for the next thirty-three months. After all, Defendant is in control of his own destiny — it is up to him (and him alone) whether the plea agreement reached with the State of Florida is breached. If Defendant does not breach the agreement, then he should have no concerns regarding his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. The fact that the U.S. Attorney (or other law enforcement officials) may object to some discovery in these civil cases is not, in an of itself, a reason to stay the civil action. Any such issues shall be resolved as they arise in the course of this litigation.</p><p block-type='Text'>Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:</p><p block-type='ListGroup'><ul><li block-type='ListItem'>I. Defendant&#x27;s Motion to Stay (DE 8) is DENIED.</li><li block-type='ListItem'>2. Defendant&#x27;s Motion for Hearing (DE 22) is DENIED AS MOOT.</li></ul></p><p block-type='Text'>3. Plaintiff&#x27;s Motion for an Extension of Time to File Response (DE 13) is GRANTED NUNC</p><p block-type='Text'>PRO TUNC.</p><p block-type='Text'>DONE AND ORDERED in at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County,</p><p block-type='Text'>Florida, this 0 day of August, 2008.</p><p block-type='Text'>KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge</p><p block-type='Text'>Copies furnished to: all counsel of record</p>
+ </body>
+</html></sup>
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739358/EFTA02739358.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739358/EFTA02739358.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..338bc2e733e946f68be867c10cd1cbb1901003f7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739358/EFTA02739358.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,261 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739358.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 5,
+  "chars": 8737,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.01,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            405.5581359863281,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            405.5581359863281,
+            100.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            100.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STAY",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            196.452,
+            325.62
+          ],
+          [
+            415.6640319824219,
+            325.62
+          ],
+          [
+            415.6640319824219,
+            341.30352783203125
+          ],
+          [
+            196.452,
+            341.30352783203125
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            49
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            11
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            73
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            33
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            49
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            49
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            21
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            11
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739358"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739363/EFTA02739363.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739363/EFTA02739363.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2d025019730db3a42881f602b312c5f615c01dde
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739363/EFTA02739363.md
@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRAi
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 4, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRA,
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 5, CASE NO.: 08-CV-8038I-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## STIPULATION FOR ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE OF PROCESS AND AGREED DATE FOR DEFENDANT'S RESPONSES TO COMPLAINTS
+
+Plaintiffs, Jane Doe 2, Jane Doe 3, Jane Doe 4 and Jane Doe 5, and Defendant Jeffrey Epstein, hereby enter into this Stipulation for Acceptance of Service of Process and Agreed Date for Responses to Complaints, as follows:
+
+1. Defendant Jeffrey Epstein waives formal service of process under Fed.R.Civ.P. 4, and hereby accepts service of process in each of these cases through service on his attorney, Michael Tein, Esq. It is stipulated, agreed and acknowledged that the Summons and Complaint (DE 1) in each of the above-referenced cases was duly served on Michael Tein, Esq. on August 5, 2008.
+
+2. It is stipulated and agreed that Defendant Jeffrey Epstein shall have thirty (30) days from the date of service, until September 4, 2008, to serve an answer or otherwise respond to each of the Complaints in these cases.
+
+Dated: August 6, 2008.
+
+Respectfully submitted:
+
+By: /s/ Jeffrey M. Herman HERMAN & MERMELSTEIN, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiffs Jane Doe 2-5 Jeffrey M. Herman (FL Bar No. 521647) iherman@hermanlaw.com Stuart S. Mermelstein (FL Bar No. 947245) ssm@hermanlaw.com Adam D. Horowitz (FL Bar No. 376980) ahorowitz@hermanlaw.com 18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160 Tel: (305) 931-2200
+
+By: s/ Michael R. Tein TEIN, P.L. Attorneys or Defendant Epstein Gu A. FL Bar No. 623740) Michael Tein, Esq. (FL Bar No. 993522) tein@ le w istein.com 3059 Grand Avenue, Suite 340 Coconut Grove, FL 33133 Tel: (305) 442-1101
+
+and
+
+ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER, et al. Attorneys for Defendant Epstein Jack A. Goldberger jagesq@bellsouth.net 250 Australian Ave. S, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739363/EFTA02739363.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739363/EFTA02739363.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a5de39fcf56789080547298ae228c989eb087b5e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739363/EFTA02739363.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,143 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739363.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 2,
+  "chars": 2145,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.17,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            405.95098876953125,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            405.95098876953125,
+            100.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            100.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "STIPULATION FOR ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE OF PROCESS \nAND AGREED DATE FOR DEFENDANT'S RESPONSES TO COMPLAINTS",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            97.92,
+            673.1099999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            514.7868041992188,
+            673.1099999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            514.7868041992188,
+            701.6030197143555
+          ],
+          [
+            97.92,
+            701.6030197143555
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            20
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            89
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            43
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            9
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739363"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739365/EFTA02739365.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739365/EFTA02739365.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0649e9933147f71034d5472c7c3491e5600c4932
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739365/EFTA02739365.md
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA,
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+/
+
+JANE DOE NO. 4, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 5, CASE NO.: 08-CV-8038I-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+1PROPOSED1 ORDER
+
+Upon the parties Joint Motion to Approve Stipulation for Acceptance of Service of Process and Agreed Date for Defendant's Responses to Complaints, and good cause being shown, said Stipulation is hereby SO ORDERED.
+
+DONE AND ORDERED in , in Ft. Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida, this day of 2008.
+
+DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
+
+LUleadingrAOnl-Sup Sen of Proctxr.doe
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739365/EFTA02739365.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739365/EFTA02739365.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5d6877b88c75127e1520087897c09c4fdb76c0da
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739365/EFTA02739365.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,120 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739365.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 2,
+  "chars": 807,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.17,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            405.95098876953125,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            405.95098876953125,
+            115.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            115.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            22
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            19
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739365"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739367/EFTA02739367.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739367/EFTA02739367.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..efb2bcf2be96e0a53371649585016d7414cb46da
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739367/EFTA02739367.md
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA I
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 4, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRA,
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 5, CASE NO.: 08-CV-8038I-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant. /
+
+## JOINT MOTION TO APPROVE STIPULATION FOR ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE OF PROCESS AND AGREED DATE FOR DEFENDANT'S RESPONSES TO COMPLAINTS
+
+Plaintiffs, Jane Doe 2. Jane Doe 3, Jane Doe 4 and Jane Doe 5, and Defendant Jeffrey Epstein, file this Joint Motion for Approval of Stipulation of Acceptance of Service of Process and Agreed Date for Defendant's Responses to Complaints, as follows:
+
+I. Plaintiffs and Defendant have entered into a Stipulation under which Defendant's counsel waives formal service of process and accepts service of process on behalf of Defendant on a date certain. The parties further agree to thirty (30) days (Le., September 4) for Defendant to file answers or otherwise respond to the Complaints.
+
+2. The Stipulation provides certainty regarding service of process and the response date, will move these lawsuits forward, and will avoid unnecessary costs of formal service of process on Defendant.
+
+WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs and Defendant jointly respectfully request that the attached Stipulation be so ordered.
+
+Dated: August 6, 2008.
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+By: /s/ Jeffrey M. Herman HERMAN & MERMELSTEIN, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiffs Jane Doe 2-5 Jeffrey M. Herman (FL Bar No. 521647) jherman @hermanlaw.com Stuart S. Mermelstein(FL Bar No 947245) ssm@hermanlaw.com Adam D. Horowitz (FL Bar No. 376980) ahorowitz@hermanlaw.com 18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160 Tel: (305) 931-2200
+
+By: /s/ Michael R. Tein TEIN, P.L. Attorneys for Defendant Epstein Michael Tein, Esq. tein@lewistein.com 3059 Grand Avenue, Suite 340 Coconut Grove, FL 33133 Tel: (305) 442-1101
+
+and
+
+ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER, et aL Attorneys for Defendant Epstein Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. jagesq@bellsouth.net 250 Australian Ave., S., Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739367/EFTA02739367.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739367/EFTA02739367.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9098308510273a7ed9e02b6446ffe13f60c7fc25
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739367/EFTA02739367.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,143 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739367.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 2,
+  "chars": 2208,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.13,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            405.95098876953125,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            405.95098876953125,
+            100.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            100.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "JOINT MOTION TO APPROVE STIPULATION FOR \nACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE OF PROCESS AND AGREED \nDATE FOR DEFENDANT'S RESPONSES TO COMPLAINTS",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            139.536,
+            673.1099999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            473.1667785644531,
+            673.1099999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            473.1667785644531,
+            715.8630142211914
+          ],
+          [
+            139.536,
+            715.8630142211914
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            57
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            20
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            91
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            44
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739367"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739369/EFTA02739369.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739369/EFTA02739369.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fbb9a86b921996e60ae46560cb2c9d5b9a99b1aa
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739369/EFTA02739369.md
@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
+JANE DOE NO. 2,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 4,
+
+Vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 5,
+
+Vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN.
+
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+![](_page_0_Picture_3.jpeg)
+
+CASE NO.: 08-80119- ME AMT
+
+CASE NO.: 08-80232-CIV-KAM-LRJ
+
+CASE NO.: 08-80380-CIV-KAM-LRJ
+
+CASE NO.: 08-80381-CIV-KAM-LRJ
+
+FILED UNDER SEAL
+
+DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
+
+![](_page_0_Picture_22.jpeg)
+
+Pursuant to Rule 5.4 of the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, defendant Jeffrey Epstein hereby moves to file his reply to plaintiffs' responses to his motions for stay, as well as this motion, under seal, stating as follows:
+
+I. In his reply to plaintiffs' responses to his motions for stay, defendant Jeffrey Epstein refers to a confidential agreement between the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida and Jeffrey Epstein.
+
+2. The information contained in the confidential agreement is material to this Court's consideration of defendant's reply to plaintiffs' responses to his motions for stay.
+
+3. To avoid disclosure of confidential material, defendant requests leave to file his reply to plaintiffs' responses to his motions for stay, and this motion, under seal.
+
+4. We recognize that this Court has previously unsealed documents referring to this same agreement. We mean in no way to disregard that order, but seek merely to comply with the confidentiality clause in that agreement for this new and independent filing, in an abundance of caution, until directed otherwise by the Court.
+
+WHEREFORE, defendant Jeffrey Epstein respectfully requests leave to file this motion and his reply to plaintiffs' responses to his motions for stay, under seal.
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+TEM, P.L. 3059 Grand Avenue, Suite 340 Coconut Grove, Florida 33133 Tel: 305 442 1101 Fax: 305 442 6744
+
+By: MICHAEL R. TEIN Fla. Bar No. 993522 tein@lewistein.com
+
+ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER & WEISS, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Tel. 561 659 8300 Fax. 561 835 8691
+
+By: Jack A. Goldberger Fla. Bar No. 262013 jgoldberger®agwpa.com
+
+## CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL RULE 7.1
+
+Undersigned counsel has conferred in good faith with counsel for the plaintiff. who opposes the relief requested in this motion.
+
+Michael R. Tein
+
+## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
+
+I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing document is being served this day, July 28, 2008, on counsel of record identified on 3c service list by U.S. Mail.
+
+• Mic ael .
+
+## Service List
+
+Jeffrey M. Herman, Esq. Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Herman & Mermelstein, P.A. 18205 Biscayne Blvd. Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160 Fax: 305 931 0877
+
+![](_page_3_Picture_4.jpeg)
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739369/EFTA02739369.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739369/EFTA02739369.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..382c4473a1d8b009039a0689235c00623ce90e92
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739369/EFTA02739369.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,273 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739369.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 4,
+  "chars": 2808,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.36,
+  "image_assets": [
+    "_page_0_Picture_3.jpeg",
+    "_page_0_Picture_22.jpeg",
+    "_page_3_Picture_4.jpeg"
+  ],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            194.34,
+            69.66
+          ],
+          [
+            396.1981201171875,
+            69.66
+          ],
+          [
+            396.1981201171875,
+            100.4730224609375
+          ],
+          [
+            194.34,
+            100.4730224609375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL RULE 7.1",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            127.83001708984375,
+            345.06
+          ],
+          [
+            456.945,
+            345.06
+          ],
+          [
+            456.945,
+            359.9630126953125
+          ],
+          [
+            127.83001708984375,
+            359.9630126953125
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            209.715,
+            524.0699999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            373.1502685546875,
+            524.0699999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            373.1502685546875,
+            538.8430023193359
+          ],
+          [
+            209.715,
+            538.8430023193359
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Service List",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            260.76,
+            70.47
+          ],
+          [
+            329.2560729980469,
+            70.47
+          ],
+          [
+            329.2560729980469,
+            85.05
+          ],
+          [
+            260.76,
+            85.05
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            55
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            22
+          ],
+          [
+            "Picture",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            54
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            49
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            69
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            13
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Picture",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739369"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739369/_page_0_Picture_22.jpeg b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739369/_page_0_Picture_22.jpeg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..28b1ad1492ac3f53744345ae62191a47fcf616d6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739369/_page_0_Picture_22.jpeg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:6196d3d98d50c22b7e0c9d16463b00b371f7f3db0f039e00d3a9ec62ba81fc72
+size 2175
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739369/_page_0_Picture_3.jpeg b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739369/_page_0_Picture_3.jpeg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0cd4beea4d868f5d598a8f399cb7c7358a0778d2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739369/_page_0_Picture_3.jpeg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:60acc5c43782520d3bb7e415507f91bc289f5923e4577e5e434ccf3007d2f2ee
+size 12254
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739369/_page_3_Picture_4.jpeg b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739369/_page_3_Picture_4.jpeg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..76d21f13628f7ca5ee9f89bbcccc18b7bcb894d1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739369/_page_3_Picture_4.jpeg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:6c767936944e7f95358083848caacb2e990ac08c9a2bf18310c7d089db8b17db
+size 2497
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739373/EFTA02739373.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739373/EFTA02739373.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3f45b17ccae8155432d11e6e402c09cf628d22be
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739373/EFTA02739373.md
@@ -0,0 +1,216 @@
+**Sealed**
+
+![](_page_0_Picture_27.jpeg)
+
+UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT  
+SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 2,
+
+CASE NO.: 08-80119-CIV-KAM-LRJ
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+CASE NO.: 08-80232-CIV-KAM-LRJ
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 4,
+
+CASE NO.: 08-80380-CIV-KAM-LRJ
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 5,
+
+CASE NO.: 08-80381-CIV-KAM-LRJ
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN.
+
+**FILED UNDER SEAL\***
+
+**EPSTEIN'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO STAY**
+
+*b/s*
+
+\* This motion is filed under seal because the deferred-prosecution agreement between the United States Attorney's Office and Mr. Epstein, discussed herein, contains a confidentiality clause. A motion to seal has been filed contemporaneously.
+
+### The Pending Federal Criminal Action
+
+In 2006, a Florida state grand jury indicted Jeffrey Epstein on allegations similar to those in the instant actions (State of Florida v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 2006 CF 09454, Fifteenth Judicial Circuit. Palm Beach County) (the "Florida Criminal Action").1 Shortly thereafter, the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (the "USAO") began a federal grand-jury investigation into allegations arising out of the same incidents alleged in the instant actions (Grand Jury No. 07-103 (WPB),2 United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida) (the "Federal Criminal Action").
+
+In September 2007, the USAO and Mr. Epstein entered into a highly unusual and unprecedented deferred-prosecution agreement (the "Agreement"), in which the USAO agreed to defer (not dismiss or close) the Federal Criminal Action on the condition that Mr. Epstein continue to comply with numerous obligations, the first of which was pleading guilty to certain state charges in the Florida Criminal Action. The Agreement itself uses the term "deferred" (rather than "dismissed" or "closed") to describe the status of the Federal Criminal Action:
+
+THEREFORE, on the authority of R. Alexander Acosta, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, prosecution in this District for these offenses shall be deferred in favor of prosecution by the State of Florida, provided that Epstein abides by the following conditions and the requirements of this Agreement . . . .
+
+Agreement, at 2.
+
+By no stretch did the USAO finalize, close, complete, dismiss or abandon the Federal Criminal Action. Indeed, as the lead federal prosecutor recently explained, the USAO merely
+
+Since the filing of the motion to stay, Mr. Epstein has pled guilty and been sentenced in the Florida Criminal Action. See Notice Concerning Motion to Stay (7/1/08). Accordingly, the Florida Criminal Action is no longer a basis for this stay. Epstein relies exclusively on the pending Federal Criminal Action for this motion and therefore here provides additional background information relating to that action.
+
+At the USAO's request, we wish to clarify a minor issue regarding the form of a citation in Epstein's initial memorandum supporting his motion to stay. That memorandum cites to the Federal Criminal Action as "fttri Grand Jury No. 07.103 (WPB)," rather than citing it simply as "Grand Jury No. 107-103 (WPB)." See Motion to Stay, at 2 (6/201081. Technically, a citation to "In re Grand Jury No. 07-103 (WPB)" could be interpreted as referring to litigation arising from Epstein's motion to quash a subpoena previously issued by "Grand Jury No. 07-103 (WPB)," which subpoena, according to the terms of the deferred-prosecution agreement between Epstein and the USAO described infra at 1-3, the USAO is presently holding in abeyance. Accordingly, we hereby clarify that our citation on Page 2 of our motion to stay denoted the grand-jury investigation itself, not litigation arising from that grand-jury investigation.
+
+"agreed to **defer** federal prosecution in favor of prosecution by the State of Florida . . . ." *See In re: Jane Doe*, Case No. 08-80736-CIV-Marra/ [REDACTED] (S.D. Fla.) (DE 14), Decl. of AUSA Villafana, 07/09/08, ¶ 5, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" (emphasis added). Under the Agreement, the USAO presently retains the continuing right to indict Mr. Epstein - - or to unseal "any" already-existing federal "charges" that may already have been handed up by the federal grand jury and sealed - - should he breach any of its provisions. Agreement, at 2.
+
+The period of the deferral continues until three months after Mr. Epstein completes service of his sentence in the Florida Criminal Action. *Id.* Indeed, the final three months of the Agreement's term constitute an extended period during which the USAO expressly retains the ability to evaluate whether Epstein committed any breaches of his numerous obligations under the Agreement while he was serving his state sentence, and, if it so determines, reserves the right to indict (or unseal an existing indictment against) Mr. Epstein - - even after he has completed serving his entire state sentence.
+
+The Agreement further provides that upon Epstein's execution of a plea agreement in the State Criminal Case, the Federal Criminal Action "will be suspended" and all pending grand-jury subpoenas "**will be held in abeyance** unless and until the defendant violates any term of this agreement." Agreement, at 5 (emphasis added). The Agreement directs the USAO and Epstein to "**maintain their evidence**, specifically evidence requested by or directly related to the grand jury subpoenas that have been issued," and to maintain such evidence "inviolate." *Id.* (emphasis added). It also expressly provides that the grand-jury subpoenas continue to remain "**outstanding**" until "**the successful completion** of the terms of this agreement." *Id.* (emphasis added).
+
+Finally, the Agreement provides that the USAO's declination of prosecution for certain enumerated offenses and dismissal of any existing (sealed) charges **will not occur until 90 days following the completion of his state sentence**:
+
+If the United States Attorney should determine, based on reliable evidence, that, during the period of the Agreement, Epstein willfully violated any of the conditions of this Agreement, then the United States Attorney may, within ninety (90) days following the expiration of the term of home confinement discussed below, provide Epstein with timely notice specifying the condition(s) of the Agreement that he has
+
+violated, and shall initiate its prosecution on any offense within sixty (60) days' of [sic] giving notice of the violation. Any notice provided to Epstein pursuant to this paragraph shall be provided within 60 days of the United States learning of facts which may provide a basis for adetermination of abreach of the Agreement.
+
+After timely fulfilling all the terms and conditions of the Agreement, no prosecution for the offenses set out on pages 1 and 2 of this Agreement, nor any other offenses that have been the subject of the joint investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the United States Attorney's Office, nor any offenses that arose from the Federal Grand Jury investigation will be instituted in this District, and the charges against Epstein, if any, will be dismissed.
+
+Agreement, at 2.
+
+Consistent with the Agreement and its position that the Federal Criminal Action continues to remain pending, the USAO recently sent letters to attorneys for people that the USAO has designated as "victims." In those letters, the USAO asked, "[1]f you do file a claim under <sup>18</sup> U.S.C. § 2255 and Mr. Epstein denies that your client is a victim of an enumerated offense, please provide notice of that denial to the undersigned [AUSA]." See Decl. of AUSA Villafana, Exhs. <sup>6</sup> & 7, at 2 (July 9, 2008). The clear implication of the USAO's request (by which the USAO appears to involve itself in the instant litigation, despite advising the recipients that it cannot "take pan in or otherwise assist in civil litigation," id), is that the USAO believes that such denial might breach the Agreement.
+
+Accordingly. the Federal Criminal Action remains "pending."
+
+#### Discussion
+
+# 1. Section 3509(k) Applies to Investigations, Not Just Indictments.
+
+While there is no unsealed indicted criminal case against Mr. Epstein, the government's criminal investigation against him remains open. Section 3509(k) clearly applies to stay civil cases during the pendency, not only of indicted criminal cases, but also of yet-to-be-closed investigations.
+
+The term "criminal action" is not expressly defined in § 3509(k). It is defined, however, by a closely related statute. Title 18, U.S.C. § 1595 provides a civil remedy for "forced labor" and "sex trafficking" violations, but stays such actions "during the pendency of any criminal action arising out of the same occurrence in which the claimant is the victim." (A copy of § 1595 is
+
+attached hereto as Exhibit "B"). In enacting § 1595, Congress specifically intended that the term "criminal action" would be applied extremely broadly. Accordingly, Congress took pains to ensure that courts would give it the broadest possible construction and, for that reason, specified in the definition provision that "criminal action" also "includes investigation." 18 U.S.C. § 1595(b)(2). The only reported decision addressing this provision interpreted it according to its plain language. *See Ara v. Khan*, No. CV 07-1251, 2007 WL 1726456, \*2 (E.D.N.Y. June 14, 2007) (ordering "all proceedings in this case stayed pending the conclusion of the government's criminal investigation of the defendants and of **any** resulting criminal prosecution") (emphasis added).
+
+Given that the USAO's Agreement with Epstein indicates that:
+
+- • the grand-jury's subpoenas remain "outstanding" (Agreement, at 5);
+- • the subpoenas are "held in abeyance" (*id.*);
+- • the subpoenas are not "withdrawn" (*id.*);
+- • the parties must "maintain their evidence" (*id.*) (which would be entirely unnecessary if the investigation against Epstein were closed);
+- • "any" existing "charges" will **not "be dismissed" until after** Epstein has "timely fulfill[ed] all the terms and conditions of the [A]greement" (*id.* at 2); and
+- • "prosecution in this District . . . shall be **deferred**" (*id.*) (but not closed or dismissed),
+
+- - then, the only reasonable conclusion is that the Federal Criminal Action remains "pending."<sup>3</sup>
+
+The plaintiff's argue that a § 3509(k) stay would be "inconsistent with Mr. Epstein's Agreement with the U.S. Attorney" which the plaintiff's claim is reproduced in the lead
+
+<sup>3</sup> The ordinary meaning of the adjective "pending" is "[r]emaining undecided; awaiting decision . . . ." *Black's Law Dictionary* 1154 (8th ed. 2004). The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit routinely relies on *Black's Law Dictionary* for the definition of statutory terms, including in criminal cases. *See e.g., United States v. Young*, 528 F.3d 1294, 1297 n.3 (11th Cir. 2008) (definitions of criminal "complaint" and "indictment"); *United States v. [REDACTED]*, 526 F.3d 691, 705 (11th Cir. 2008) (definition of "knowingly" in criminal statute). A Westlaw search revealed that in 2008 alone, the Eleventh Circuit has already published eight opinions relying on *Black's Law Dictionary* for definitions. *See also, [REDACTED] v. Klitzkie*, 281 F.3d 920, 928 (9th Cir. 2002) (relying on *Black's Law Dictionary*, in the context of a criminal case, for the definition of "pending" as "awaiting decision"); *Swartz v. Meyers*, 204 F.3d 417, 421 (3d Cir. 2000) (relying on *Black's Law Dictionary* for the definition of "pending," expressly because "pending" is not defined in the statute"). Any common-sense reading of the Agreement and the USAO's recent sworn construction of it, is consonant with the Federal Criminal Action's "remaining undecided" and "awaiting decision." *See Unified Gov't of Athens-Clarke County v. Athens Newspapers, LLC*, No. S07G1133, S.E.2d \_\_\_, 2008 WL 2579238, \*3 (Ga. June 30, 2008) (reviewing a public-records request against Georgia's "pending investigation" exception to its open-records law, and holding that "a seemingly inactive investigation which has not yet resulted in a prosecution logically "remains undecided," and is therefore "pending," until it "is concluded and the file **closed**") (emphasis added).
+
+prosecutor's July 10 letter to their counsel (attached to Plaintiffs' responses as Exhibit A). Apparently, on July 10, the lead prosecutor sent a letter to the plaintiffs' lawyer stating that "[o]ne . . . condition to which Epstein has agreed" is that each plaintiff "will have the same rights to proceed under Section 2255 as she would have had, if Mr. Epstein had been tried federally and convicted of an enumerated offense.- See Response Memo, at 5 & Ex. A, at 1-2 (emphasis added). This argument warrants absolutely no consideration, however, since the plaintiffs have not pled any claims under 18 U.S.C. § 2255.
+
+# II. Section 35091k) Applies Even After aPlaintiff Turns 18.
+
+Without citing to a single case, the plaintiffs argue that § 3509(k) does not apply to plaintiffs over the age of 18. An examination of the legislative history and related statutes shows that this unsupported argument must be rejected.
+
+The parallel stay provision in § 1595, discussed supra at 3-4, mandates, without exception, that any civil action brought under that section for violations of § 1591 (prohibiting transportation of minors for prostitution) "shall be stayed during the pendency of any criminal action arising out of the same occurrence in which the claimant is the victim." <sup>18</sup> U.S.C. § 1591(bX1). Whether the § 1595 plaintiff has turned 18 does not vitiate the efficacy of this mandatory stay.
+
+An example illustrates why the stay provided in § 3509(k) has the same broad scope as the stay provided in § 1591(bX1). As discussed above, § 3509(k) stays any civil suit for injury to <sup>a</sup> minor, arising out of the same occurrence as a pending criminal action. One type of civil suit falling within § 3509(k)'s ambit is a suit seeking redress for a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2423(a). Section 2423(a) - - just like § 1591 - - prohibits transportation of minors for prostitution. The elements of both statutes are identical. There would simply be no legitimate basis for Congress to differentiate between the consequences attached to violating these two sections. Thus, just as Congress mandated under § 1595(bX1) that civil discovery shall be stayed when there is an ongoing federal investigation under § 1591 (even after the victim turns 18), the identical treatment should apply under § 3509(k) to civil actions brought for the identical violation of § 2423(a).
+
+Logic compels a rule requiring continued application of the § 3509(k) stay to a putative victim who has since turned 18. Consider again the example of § 2243(a). Assume that the USAO is investigating a § 2243(a) violator with two alleged victims; one who is now 17, and one who has turned 19. Assume further that both decide to sue the alleged offender while the USA() is still in the process of conducting its criminal investigation. Why would Congress prohibit the defendant from conducting civil discovery in the 17-year-old's lawsuit, but permit him to conduct full discovery in the 19-year-old's lawsuit, including taking the depositions of both the 19- and the <sup>17</sup>-year-old, the federal investigating agents and all the grand-jury witnesses? This could not have been Congress' intent.
+
+The legislative history to a statute resembling § 1595 is also instructive. When Congress enacted 18 U.S.C. § 2255, it provided a civil remedy to any "minor . . . victim" of enumerated federal sex offenses. See Child Abuse Victims' Rights Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-500, 100 Stat. 1783, § 703 (1986). In 2006, Congress amended the statute to clarify that the civil cause of action was available not just while the victim was <sup>a</sup>minor, but even after she or he turned 18. See Pub. L. 109-248, 120 Stat. 650, § 707 (bX1XA) (amending § 2255 to permit suit by adults who were victims of enumerated federal offenses when they were minors, by deleting "Any minor who is [a victim[" and adding "Any person, who, while a minor, was [a victim)"). Meanwhile, the stay provisions of § 3509(k) remained unchanged. There is no reason to think that Congress would afford prosecutors protection for their investigations while the victims were minors, but completely eliminate those protections the moment one of the victims turned 18.
+
+The District Court for the Northern District of Florida confirmed this position and specifically rejected the plaintiffs' contrary argument. See Doe v. Francis, No. 5:03 CV 260, <sup>2005</sup> WL 950623, at \*2 (N.D. Fla. 2005). The plaintiffs there argued that "the stay should be lifted due to the fact that the minor Plaintiffs have now reached the age of majority during the pendency of the state criminal case." Id. The court found this argument "unavailing . . . given the victims' minor status at the time of the events giving rise to the underlying claims." Id. (Interestingly, the arguments made by Jane Doe Nos. 2-5 in their oppositions to Epstein's motion to stay presently pending before this Court, are literally lifted' from the plaintiffs' brief submitted to, and rejected by. the Northern District of New York in Francis.) The court specifically held that "because the victims were minors at the time of the Defendants' actions alleged in both [the civil and criminal] cases, § 3509(k) applies." Id. (emphasis added).
+
+The United States Department of Justice has itself emphatically embraced the interpretation of § 3509(k) as applying to stay all civil actions relating to sex offenses against minors, pending the completion of a parallel criminal action, without regard to whether the plaintiff has turned 18 during her civil lawsuit:
+
+The subsection should stay all pending civil actions in the wake of a criminal prosecution. Notably, in the context of 18 USC § 2255 ("civil remedy for persona<sup>l</sup> injuries"). all civil actions are stayed pending the completion of a criminal action. See also 18 USC § 3509(k).
+
+H.R. Rep. 108-264(11), 108th Cong., 1st Sess. (2003), reprinted at 2003 WL 22272907, at \*16-17 ("agency view" by the Department of Justice on bill later codified at 18 U.S.C. § 1595).
+
+The Department specifically argued to Congress in the clearest terms: "We believe that prosecutions should take priority over civil redress and that prosecutions should be complete prior to going forward with civil suits." Id. at 17 (emphasis added). Nowhere did the Department remotely suggest - - as the plaintiffs have implied - - that pending prosecutions warrant less protection (Le., should be "hinder[ed]") simply because a particular civil plaintiff happens to reach his or her 18th birthday.
+
+# III. A Stay is Mandatory Despite Resulting "Delay" to Civil Lawsuits.
+
+Inherent in any § 3509(k) stay is delay to the progress (discovery, trial, appeal) of all related civil lawsuits. Congress recognized this in enacting the stay provision, which necessarily prioritized the interests of completing acriminal investigation and prosecution over the interests of aparticular plaintiff in seeking personal pecuniary damages. Based on this reasoning, the Francis
+
+Compere Doe v. Francis, Case No. 5:03cv260-MCR-WCS (N.D. Fla.), Memorandum in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion to Reconsider Plaintiffs' Motion to Lift Stay and for Status Conference (DE 92, available on PACER), with Plaintiff; Memorandum of Law in Response to Defendant's Motion to Stay, filed in Case Nos. 08-ev-80119-KAM (Doe No. 2. DE 25), 08-cv-80232-KAM (Doe No. 3, DE 20), 08-ev-80380-KAM (Doe No. 4. DE 31), and 08-ev-80381-K AM (Doe No. 5, DE 29).
+
+court specifically refused to provide any relief to plaintiffs "simply because the state [criminal] matter is not progressing as fast as they would hope." 2005 WI, 950623, at •2. The court made this determination despite the plaintiffs' complaints about the "frustrating delay" and that "the state criminal case 'has languished for almost two years with no end in sight,' finding that this "is amatter to be addressed in state [criminal] court." Id. Accordingly. the anticipated delay in this case, attendant to the term of the deferred-prosecution agreement, does not change the clear command of § 3509(k).
+
+According to their own pleadings, the plaintiffs waited between three and six years before filing these lawsuits,<sup>5</sup> and so cannot rightfully claim prejudice from additional temporary delay.
+
+## IV. Section 3509 Aside, a Discretionary Stay is Warranted.
+
+Even, arguendo, were this Court not to apply the mandate of § 3509, a discretionary stay should still be entered during the pendency of the Federal Criminal Action. SEC v. Heahhsouth Corp.. 261 F. Supp. 2d 1298, 1326 (N.D. Ala. 2003) ("No question exists that this court has the power to stay acivil proceeding due to an active, parallel criminal investigation."). Other federal statutes support such a stay — particularly when the criminal action may be adversely affected by the civil litigation. For example, under 18 U.S.C. § 2712(eX1), "the court shall stay any action commenced [against the United States] if the court determines that civil discovery will adversely affect the ability of the Government to conduct a related investigation or prosecution of a related criminal case." Allowing these lawsuits to progress while Epstein remains subject to the Federal Criminal Action will prejudice him irrevocably and irreparably. As provided below, there are several adverse effects to allowing the civil litigation to proceed while the Federal Criminal Action remains pending.
+
+In these lawsuits, Epstein has a right to defend himself. In the Federal Criminal Action, Epstein has a right against self-incrimination.<sup>6</sup> Without a stay, Epstein will be immediately forced to abandon one of these rights.
+
+<sup>5</sup> Jane Does No. 2 and No. 3 allege that their claims arose "bin or about 2004-2005;" Jane Does No. 4 and No. <sup>5</sup> allege that their claims arose tin or about 2002-2003." Complaints. ¶ 8.
+
+Should he choose his Fifth Amendment rights, he will expose himself to an adverse inference at the summary-judgment stage and at trial. See generally, Wehling v. Columbia Broad. Sys.. 611 F.2d 1026, 1027 (5th Cir. 1980) (observing that "invocation of the privilege would be subject to the drawing of an adverse inference by the trier of fact").
+
+On the other hand, should Epstein choose his right to defend himself in these lawsuits, the USAO will be able to use his responses at every stage of the discovery and trial process (e.g., his Answer, responses to document requests, responses to requests for admissions, sworn answers to interrogatories, answers to deposition questions, and trial testimony) to his detriment in the Federal Criminal Action.?
+
+In these lawsuits, even before civil discovery begins, under the Initial Disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 and S.D. Fla. Local Rule 26.1, Epstein "must" disclose the identities of all the witnesses he would call in his defense to the Federal Criminal Action (Rule 26(a)(1)(AXi)), copies of "all documents" he "may use to support [his] defenses" (Rule 26(a)(I)(A)(ii)), as well as the identity of "any" expert witness he "may use at trial," along with mandatory disclosure of "a written report" containing "a complete statement of all opinions the [expert] will express and the basis and reasons for them" (Rule 26(a)(2XA) and (B)(i)).
+
+In contrast, in the pending Federal Criminal Action, which is governed exclusively by the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the USAO would not be entitled to compel pm-trial production of any of this information. See Fed. R. Cr. P. 16(b)(1)(A), (C), and 16(bX2); United Stales v. Argomaniz. 925 F.2d 1349, 1355-56 (11th Cir. 1991) (explaining act-of-production privilege).
+
+Thus, absent a stay of this civil action, the USAO would receive fundamentally unfair access to defense information and highly prejudicial advance insight into criminal defense
+
+<sup>&</sup>quot; The privilege applies in -instances where the witness has reasonable cause to apprehend danger" of criminal liability. Hoffman v. United States, 341 U.S. 479,486 (1951).
+
+<sup>7</sup>This could give the USAO atremendous advantage in prosecuting Epstein in the Federal Criminal Action. See Comment, Using Equitable Powers to Coordinate Parallel Civil and Criminal Actions, 98 Harv. L. Rev. 1023, <sup>1030</sup> (1985) (observing that "the prosecutor may have access to detailed civil depositions of the accused witnesses, while the rules of criminal procedure bar the accused from deposing the prosecutor's witnesses").
+
+strategy. See Comment, 98 Harv. L. Rev. at 1030 ("To the extent that a prosecutor acquires evidence that was elicited from the accused in aparallel civil proceeding, the criminal process becomes less adversarial.").
+
+Without a stay in place, discovery will proceed, including against third parties. Mr. Epstein will have no alternative but to issue subpoenas seeking evidence from state and federal law-enforcement officers. For example, Epstein is clearly entitled to discover evidence of prior statements (including inconsistent statements) given by witnesses whom law-enforcement has previously interviewed. See, e.g., Cox v. Treadway, 75 F.3d 230, 239 (6th Cir. 1996) (holding that district court properly admitted testimony of prosecutor about prior inconsistent statements that witness made to the prosecutor). Likewise, Epstein may be entitled to discovery of relevant evidence that is in the present possession of the grand jury or other law-enforcement agencies. See, e.g., Simpson v. Hines, 729 F. Supp. 526, 527 (E.D. Tex. 1989) ("The grand jury has concluded its deliberations . . The need for secrecy of these specific tapes no longer outweighs other concerns."); Golden Quality Ice Cream Co., Inc. v. Deerfield Specialty Papers, Inc., <sup>87</sup> F.R.D. 53, 59 (E.D. Pa. 1980) ("[W]here, as here, the grand jury has completed its work and all that is sought are those documents turned over to the grand jury by the corporations which are defendants in the civil case, the considerations . . . militating against disclosure are beside the point.") (citing Douglas Oil Co. of Calif. v. Petrol Stops Nw., 441 U.S. 211 (1979)).
+
+In response to such third-party subpoenas to law-enforcement witnesses, we anticipate that it will be the government, not Mr. Epstein, who will object to discovery in these civil cases, until the final conclusion of the Federal Criminal Action.
+
+#### Conclusion
+
+Because these lawsuits arise from the same allegations as the Federal Criminal Action, this Court should stay these cases until that criminal action is no longer pending.
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+[REDACTED] TEIN, P.L.  
+3059 Grand Avenue, Suite 340  
+Coconut Grove, Florida 33133  
+Tel: 305 442 1101 Fax: 305 442 6744
+
+By:
+
+![]()GUY A. [REDACTED]  
+Fla. Bar No. 623740  
+[REDACTED]  
+MICHAEL R. TEIN  
+Fla. Bar No. 993522  
+tein@lewistein.com
+
+ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER & WEISS, P.A.  
+250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400  
+West Palm Beach, Florida 33401  
+Tel. 561 659 8300 Fax. 561 835 8691
+
+By: Jack A. Goldberger  
+Fla. Bar No. 262013  
+jgoldberger@agwpa.com
+
+*Attorneys for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein*
+
+**CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL RULE 7.1.A.3**
+
+While defense counsel admittedly did not confer with plaintiffs' counsel prior to filing the motion to stay, it was by no means in willful disregard of the Local Rule. Shortly after the filing of the motion and **before** plaintiffs filed their response memoranda suggesting that no conference had taken place, **the parties did confer in a good-faith and specific attempt to resolve the motion** and were unable to do so, because plaintiffs' counsel would not agree to a stay. Accordingly, the brief delay in conducting the Rule 7.1 conference did not prejudice the plaintiffs at all or result in unnecessary judicial intervention. It is perhaps worth noting that, contrary to their Rule 7.1 certificate, plaintiffs did not confer prior to filing their motion to extend time to file their response memoranda (which extension defendant did not oppose anyway, including on the basis of failure to comply with Rule 7.1). Further information on the reasons the Rule 7.1 conference for the instant motion to stay was conducted after filing the motion to stay will be provided to the Court upon its request, preferably *ex parte* in order to avoid disclosure of privileged information. The defendant respectfully requests the opportunity to make such an *ex parte* disclosure in the event that the Court considers denying the motion under Local Rule 7.1.A.3. In any event, we apologize to the Court for non-compliance with the pre-filing requirement of the Rule, would have conferred even sooner had plaintiffs pointed the issue out immediately upon receipt of our motion, did confer with plaintiffs' counsel prior to filing the motion to seal this reply, and commit to precise compliance with the Rule for the remainder of this litigation.
+
+![]()Jack Goldberger, Michael Tein
+
+## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
+
+I HEREBY CERTIFY that a copy of the foregoing was served on July 28, 2008 by U.S. mail on all counsel named on the service list.
+
+Michael R. Tein
+
+### SERVICE LIST
+
+Jeffrey M. Herman, Esq. Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Herman & Mermelstein, P.A. 18205 Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739373/EFTA02739373.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739373/EFTA02739373.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..57bffaf0164771e861ff532b936c4528186ca776
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739373/EFTA02739373.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,785 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739373.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 13,
+  "chars": 29536,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 13.86,
+  "image_assets": [
+    "_page_0_Picture_27.jpeg"
+  ],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            195.57,
+            104.49
+          ],
+          [
+            391.755,
+            104.49
+          ],
+          [
+            391.755,
+            131.22
+          ],
+          [
+            195.57,
+            131.22
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "EPSTEIN'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO STAY",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            139.60500000000002,
+            588.06
+          ],
+          [
+            451.40999999999997,
+            588.06
+          ],
+          [
+            451.40999999999997,
+            600.21
+          ],
+          [
+            139.60500000000002,
+            600.21
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "The Pending Federal Criminal Action",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            193.72500000000002,
+            62.37
+          ],
+          [
+            393.19818115234375,
+            62.37
+          ],
+          [
+            393.19818115234375,
+            78.17999267578125
+          ],
+          [
+            193.72500000000002,
+            78.17999267578125
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Discussion",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            274.90500000000003,
+            485.18999999999994
+          ],
+          [
+            336.45306396484375,
+            485.18999999999994
+          ],
+          [
+            336.45306396484375,
+            498.96
+          ],
+          [
+            274.90500000000003,
+            498.96
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "1. Section 3509(k) Applies to Investigations, Not Just Indictments.",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            65.19,
+            505.43999999999994
+          ],
+          [
+            432.3987121582031,
+            505.43999999999994
+          ],
+          [
+            432.3987121582031,
+            528.1200000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            65.19,
+            528.1200000000001
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "II. Section 35091k) Applies Even After aPlaintiff Turns 18.",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            58.425000000000004,
+            234.89999999999998
+          ],
+          [
+            384.375,
+            234.89999999999998
+          ],
+          [
+            384.375,
+            258.39
+          ],
+          [
+            58.425000000000004,
+            258.39
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "III. A Stay is Mandatory Despite Resulting \"Delay\" to Civil Lawsuits.",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            66.42,
+            519.21
+          ],
+          [
+            444.3011474609375,
+            519.21
+          ],
+          [
+            444.3011474609375,
+            541.8900000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            66.42,
+            541.8900000000001
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "IV. Section 3509 Aside, a Discretionary Stay is Warranted.",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            59.655,
+            284.31
+          ],
+          [
+            384.08160400390625,
+            284.31
+          ],
+          [
+            384.08160400390625,
+            305.37
+          ],
+          [
+            59.655,
+            305.37
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Conclusion",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 10,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            269.985,
+            572.67
+          ],
+          [
+            334.1397399902344,
+            572.67
+          ],
+          [
+            334.1397399902344,
+            586.9441680908203
+          ],
+          [
+            269.985,
+            586.9441680908203
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL RULE 7.1.A.3",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 11,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            119.92500000000001,
+            428.49
+          ],
+          [
+            469.245,
+            428.49
+          ],
+          [
+            469.245,
+            442.26000000000005
+          ],
+          [
+            119.92500000000001,
+            442.26000000000005
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 12,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            213.40499999999997,
+            89.91
+          ],
+          [
+            380.9859313964844,
+            89.91
+          ],
+          [
+            380.9859313964844,
+            106.4730224609375
+          ],
+          [
+            213.40499999999997,
+            106.4730224609375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "SERVICE LIST",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 12,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            252.14999999999998,
+            214.64999999999998
+          ],
+          [
+            343.8769226074219,
+            214.64999999999998
+          ],
+          [
+            343.8769226074219,
+            230.60302734375
+          ],
+          [
+            252.14999999999998,
+            230.60302734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            39
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "Picture",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            88
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            36
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            469
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            34
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            459
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            30
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            493
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            30
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            471
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            33
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            442
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            30
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 9,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            465
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            32
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 10,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            371
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 11,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            35
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 12,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            14
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Caption",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739373"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739373/_page_0_Picture_27.jpeg b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739373/_page_0_Picture_27.jpeg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f561faae2ed567b9772dd0fe4b99a71aa6026ff0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739373/_page_0_Picture_27.jpeg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:1bea0e55dbc1728c0503e743c7089adb2054309b3aaa4ccc0e3d7a47dbf56342
+size 12411
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739386/EFTA02739386.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739386/EFTA02739386.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..09cf25873411ab4ad2df977c2eff3a36ce24c4c7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739386/EFTA02739386.md
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+v.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## NOTICE OF APPEARANCE
+
+Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, LLP file their appearance as co-counsel for Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, in the above-styled matter.
+
+## Certificate of Service
+
+I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record identified on the following Service List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on this 27th day of August , 2008:
+
+Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Jeffrey Marc Herman, Esq. Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. 18205 Biscayne Boulevard Suite 2218 Miami, FL 33160 305-931-2200 Fax: 305-931-0877 a horowitze hermanlaw.com jherman@hermanlaw.com Iriveraehermanlaw.com Counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe #3
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 561-659-8300 Fax: 561-835-8691 jaqesqebellsouth.net Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
+
+Jane Doe No. 3 v. Epstein  
+Page 2
+
+Michael R. Tein, Esq.  
+██████████ Tein, P.L.  
+3059 Grand Avenue, Suite 340  
+Coconut Grove, FL 33133  
+305-442-1101  
+Fax: 305 442 6744  
+*Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein*  
+[tein@lewistein.com](mailto:tein@lewistein.com)
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+**BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER  
+& COLEMAN, LLP**
+
+515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400  
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401  
+(561) 842-2820
+
+By:
+
+![]()Robert D. Critton, Jr.  
+Florida Bar #224162  
+Michael J. Pike  
+Florida Bar #617296
+
+*Co-counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein*  
+[rcrit@bclclaw.com](mailto:rcrit@bclclaw.com)  
+[mpike@bclclaw.com](mailto:mpike@bclclaw.com)
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739386/EFTA02739386.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739386/EFTA02739386.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c0bfdbb29be690babcf8d2cb735fc37e6ce37eec
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739386/EFTA02739386.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,158 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739386.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 2,
+  "chars": 1797,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 3.88,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            199.512,
+            81.81
+          ],
+          [
+            408.6499938964844,
+            81.81
+          ],
+          [
+            408.6499938964844,
+            110.79998779296875
+          ],
+          [
+            199.512,
+            110.79998779296875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "NOTICE OF APPEARANCE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            224.60399999999998,
+            304.56
+          ],
+          [
+            383.26678466796875,
+            304.56
+          ],
+          [
+            383.26678466796875,
+            319.67999267578125
+          ],
+          [
+            224.60399999999998,
+            319.67999267578125
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Certificate of Service",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            259.488,
+            401.76
+          ],
+          [
+            385.1554260253906,
+            401.76
+          ],
+          [
+            385.1554260253906,
+            416.79998779296875
+          ],
+          [
+            259.488,
+            416.79998779296875
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            77
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            39
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            22
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739386"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739388/EFTA02739388.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739388/EFTA02739388.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4702901d037e5d7b276fe9154a9d92e315a83de5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739388/EFTA02739388.md
@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
+### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-80232-CIV-MARRAY
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN
+
+Defendant.
+
+# MOTION TO DISMISS
+
+Defendant Jeffrey Epstein, pursuant to Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Rule 7.1(A) of the Local Rules for the Southern District of Florida, moves to dismiss Count I of plaintiffs complaint,' and states as follows:
+
+<sup>&#</sup>x27; The time to answer the remaining allegations of the complaint is tolled pending the Court's ruling on the present motion. See Beaulieu v. Bd. of Trustees of Univ. of W. Fla., No. 3:07cv30/RV/EMT, 2007 WL 2020161, \* 2 (N.D. Fla. July 9, 2007) (holding that defendant's partial motion to dismiss "automatically extends its time to answer . . . until after the court has ruled on [its] motion to dismiss"); Finnegan v. Univ. of Rochester Med. Ctr., 180 F.R.D. 247, 249 (W.D.N.Y. 1998) (concluding "that the filing of a motion that only addresses part of a complaint suspends the time to respond to the entire complaint, not just to the claims that are the subject of the motion"); v. Berry College, Inc., No. Civ.A. 4:96CV338-HLM, 1997 WL 579166, \*1 (N.D. Ga. July 3, 1997) (noting that there is significant case law to support the position that "when a defendant files a Rule I2(b) motion to dismiss, addressing only some of the claims contained in the plaintiffs complaint, the defendant is not required to file an answer until the court rules on the motion to dismiss").
+
+#### ALLEGATIONS IN PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
+
+This action arises out of the alleged assault of the plaintiff. According to the allegations in her complaint, the plaintiff went to Mr. Epstein's house to give him "a massage for monetary compensation" (Compl. ¶ 12), where Mr. Epstein allegedly assaulted her "in violation of Chapter 800 of the Florida Statutes." (Compl. ¶ 18).
+
+The plaintiff tries to assert a claim for sexual assault (Compl. ¶¶ 15-19.) This theory of liability, however, cannot be supported by the allegations in the complaint. In fact, even if everything in the complaint were true, recovery against Jeffrey Epstein, for Count I, under any formulation, is impossible under Florida law. Accordingly, this count must be dismissed.
+
+# ARGUMENT
+
+A motion to dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) should be granted when a court cannot identify "each of the material elements necessary to sustain a recovery under some viable legal theory." Snow v. DirectTV, Inc., 450 F.3d 1314, 1320 (11th Cir. 2006) (quoting Roe v. Aware Woman Cm For Choice, Inc., 253 F.3d 678, 684 (11th Cir. 2001)). Moreover, a court should dismiss a complaint "when, on the basis of a dispositive issue of law, no construction of the factual allegations will support a cause of action." Marshall County Bd. of Educ. v. Marshal County Gas Dist, 992 F.2d 1171, 1174 (11th Cir. 1993). "[T]o survive a
+
+motion to dismiss, plaintiffs must do more than merely state legal conclusions; they are required to allege some specific factual bases for those conclusions . . . ." Holt v. Crist, No. 06-14617, 2007 WL 1156938, \*2 (11th Cir. Apr. 19, 2007). As such, "conclusory allegations, unwarranted deductions of facts or legal conclusions masquerading as facts will not prevent dismissal." Snow, 450 F.3d at 1320.
+
+## I. Count I Fails to State a Cause of Action For Assault Recognized by Florida Law.
+
+The plaintiff attempts to plead a cause of action against Mr. Epstein for "sexual assault" based on a "violation of Chapter 800 of the Florida Statutess2 for the "lewd and lascivious acts committed by Epstein upon Jane Doe." (Compl. ¶ 18.) Plaintiff cannot assert a cause of action for "violation of Chapter 800, Florida Statutes" because there is no private right of action under that Chapter. See generally Am. Home Assurance Co. v. Plaza Materials Corp., 908 So. 2d 360, 374 (Fla. 2005) (observing that "not every statutory violation carries a civil remedy") (citing Villazon v. Prudential Health Care Plan, Inc., 843 So. 2d 842, 852 (Fla. 2003)). See also, e.g., Miami Herald Publ'g Co. v. Ferre, 636 F. Supp. 970 (S.D. Fla. 1985) (M, C.J.) (holding that violation of Florida's criminal extortion statute does not give rise to a civil cause of action for damages).
+
+<sup>2</sup>Chapter 800, Florida Statutes, is entitled, "Lewdness; Indecent Exposure."
+
+Where a plaintiff brings a civil action pursuant to a criminal statute that provides no civil remedy, her complaint is properly dismissed for failure to state a cause of action. See Mantooth v. Richards, 557 So. 2d 646, 646 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990) (per curiam) (affirming dismissal of plaintiff's claim for parental kidnapping where "the mentioned statutes concern only criminal violations and do not afford a civil remedy") (citation omitted) (emphasis added).
+
+Even if Chapter 800 provided a civil remedy (which it does not) the statute does not apply to the plaintiff. The statute prohibits sexual activity with or lewd or lascivious offenses against "a person . . . less than 16 years of age." § 800.04, Fla. Stat. (2008) (emphasis added). By her own admission, the plaintiff was "then 16 years old." (Compl. ¶ 8.) (emphasis added). Plainly, the plaintiff falls outside of the scope of the statute's protection. Accordingly, the plaintiff's claim for sexual assault against Mr. Epstein, pursuant to a violation of Chapter 800, Florida Statutes, must be dismissed.
+
+Should the Court look beyond the plain language of the plaintiffs complaint and construe Count I as a claim for common-law assault, that claim would also fail. As the court explained in Lay v. Kremer, 411 So. 2d 1347, 1349 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), an assault is "an intentional, unlawful offer of corporal injury to another by force, or force unlawfully directed toward another under such circumstances as to create a fear of imminent peril, coupled with the apparent
+
+present ability to effectuate the attempt." An assault thus requires "an affirmative act—a threat to use force, or the actual exertion of force." v. AtI Fed. Say. & Loan Assoc., 454 So. 2d 52, 54 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984) (affirming dismissal of assault claim where there was no affirmative act).
+
+In this case, there is no such affirmative act. In fact, the plaintiff does not allege that Mr. Epstein touched her or even spoke to her. Nor does the plaintiff allege that she was placed in any fear of imminent peril. See Gatto v. Publix Supermarket, Inc., 387 So. 2d 377, 379 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980) (holding that where there was no evidence to show that Gatto was placed in fear of imminent peril, there was no assault). Instead, the plaintiff merely makes the conclusory allegation that Mr. Epstein "sexually assaulted [her] during the massage" without alleging any facts to support this allegation. This conclusory allegation is insufficient.
+
+Accordingly, because the plaintiff has failed to plead a cause of action for assault recognized in Florida, Count I against Mr. Epstein must be dismissed.
+
+#### Conclusion
+
+For the reasons set forth herein, Defendant Jeffrey Epstein respectfully requests that Count I of the plaintiff's complaint be dismissed.
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+TEIN, P.L. 3059 Grand Avenue, Suite 340 Coconut Grove, Florida 33133 Tel: 305 442 1101 Fax: 305 442 6744
+
+By: /s/ Michael R. Tein GUY A. Fla. Bar No. 623740 MICHAEL R. TEIN Fla. Bar No. 993522 tein@lewistein.com
+
+ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER & WEISS, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Tel. 561 659 8300 Fax. 561 835 8691
+
+By: Jack A. Goldberger Fla. Bar No. 262013 jgoldberger@agwpa.com
+
+BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTHER & COLEMAN, LLP 515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Tel. 561 842 2820 Fax. 561 515 3148
+
+By: Robert D. Critton, Esq. Fla. Bar No. 224162 rcritton@bciclaw.com Michael J. Pike, Esq. Fla. Bar No. 617296 mpike@bc1claw.com
+
+Attorneys for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
+
+# CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL RULE 7.1
+
+Undersigned counsel has conferred in good faith with counsel for the plaintiff, who opposes the relief requested in this motion.
+
+Is/ Michael R. Tein
+
+Michael R. Tein
+
+# CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
+
+I HEREBY CERTIFY that on September 4, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all individuals on the following service list via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF.
+
+/s/ Michael R. Tein
+
+Michael R. Tein
+
+## Service List
+
+Jeffrey M. Herman, Esq. Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Herman & Mermelstein, P.A. 18205 Biscayne Blvd, Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160 Fax: 305 931 0877
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739388/EFTA02739388.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739388/EFTA02739388.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7386d9f28368e817c74aebad9bc87e716e4c6d65
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739388/EFTA02739388.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,536 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739388.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 8,
+  "chars": 8664,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.12,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            197.06400000000002,
+            72.9
+          ],
+          [
+            425.9345397949219,
+            72.9
+          ],
+          [
+            425.9345397949219,
+            106.23248291015625
+          ],
+          [
+            197.06400000000002,
+            106.23248291015625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "MOTION TO DISMISS",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            241.74,
+            357.21000000000004
+          ],
+          [
+            391.6444396972656,
+            357.21000000000004
+          ],
+          [
+            391.6444396972656,
+            374.36248779296875
+          ],
+          [
+            241.74,
+            374.36248779296875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "ALLEGATIONS IN PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            165.24,
+            73.71000000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            468.87884521484375,
+            73.71000000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            468.87884521484375,
+            89.991455078125
+          ],
+          [
+            165.24,
+            89.991455078125
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "ARGUMENT",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            271.116,
+            427.68
+          ],
+          [
+            359.3599853515625,
+            427.68
+          ],
+          [
+            359.3599853515625,
+            445.1214599609375
+          ],
+          [
+            271.116,
+            445.1214599609375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "I. Count I Fails to State a Cause of Action For Assault Recognized by \nFlorida Law.",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            84.456,
+            245.43
+          ],
+          [
+            552.0101318359375,
+            245.43
+          ],
+          [
+            552.0101318359375,
+            279.12091064453125
+          ],
+          [
+            84.456,
+            279.12091064453125
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Conclusion",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            278.46000000000004,
+            526.5
+          ],
+          [
+            350.6211242675781,
+            526.5
+          ],
+          [
+            350.6211242675781,
+            542.7509307861328
+          ],
+          [
+            278.46000000000004,
+            542.7509307861328
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL RULE 7.1",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            127.29599999999999,
+            252.71999999999997
+          ],
+          [
+            508.8437194824219,
+            252.71999999999997
+          ],
+          [
+            508.8437194824219,
+            270.50091552734375
+          ],
+          [
+            127.29599999999999,
+            270.50091552734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            220.93199999999996,
+            430.11
+          ],
+          [
+            410.8152160644531,
+            430.11
+          ],
+          [
+            410.8152160644531,
+            447.1209411621094
+          ],
+          [
+            220.93199999999996,
+            447.1209411621094
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Service List",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            277.236,
+            76.94999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            353.059326171875,
+            76.94999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            353.059326171875,
+            93.75146484375
+          ],
+          [
+            277.236,
+            93.75146484375
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            47
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            24
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            23
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            45
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            23
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            41
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            21
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            61
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            31
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            45
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            23
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            9
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            23
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739388"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739396/EFTA02739396.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739396/EFTA02739396.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b2f7806d4c85c3a90a287af21cc0da47b95e1426
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739396/EFTA02739396.md
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## PLAINTIFF'S MEMORANDUM IN RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS
+
+Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 3, ("Jane" or "Jane Doe"), by and through her undersigned counsel, files this Memorandum in Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, and states as follows:
+
+I. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein is alleged to have sexually abused Jane Doe when she was a minor. The Complaint is in two Counts: Count I is labeled "Sexual Assault", and alleges an intentional tort based on the actions of Jeffrey Epstein; Count II alleges the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress based on the same factual allegations. Defendant Epstein has moved to dismiss only Count I of the Complaint, contending that Plaintiff has failed to state a claim. Simultaneously herewith, Plaintiff intends to file an Amended Complaint which substantially revises Count I and moots the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss.'
+
+<sup>&#</sup>x27; The Amended Complaint also adds as Count III a federal claim against Defendant Epstein under 18 U.S.C. §§2422 and 2255. Under Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a), a party may amend the pleading once as a matter of course before being served with a "responsive pleading". Defendant has not to date filed a "responsive pleading" in this case within the meaning of Fed.R.Civ.P. 7(a). It is established in the courts of the Eleventh Circuit that a motion to dismiss is not a "responsive pleadin " and does not affect a plaintiffs right to amend the pleading once as a matter of course. v. Board of Regents, 477 F.3d 1282, 1291 (1 I th Cir. 2007).
+
+2. In any event, the Complaint sufficiently alleged a claim for sexual assault and battery. The gravamen of the claims in Count I is set forth in paragraph 16 of the Complaint: "Epstein tortiously assaulted lane Doe sexually. Epstein's acts were intentional, unlawful, offensive and harmful."
+
+3. Count I does not purport to be brought under the criminal statutes.2 Whether a Complaint states a claim for relief is not based on labels or conclusions; rather it is determined by the factual allegations, which "must be enough to raise a right to relief above the speculative level." Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombley 127 5. Ct. 1955, 1965 (2007). Hem, the factual allegations establish an intentional tort claim for sexual assault and battery.3 See Paul v. Holbrook, 696 So.2d 1311 (F►a. **5th DCA 1997) ("[a] battery consists of the infliction of a harmful or offensive contact upon another with the intent to cause such contact or the apprehension that such contact is imminent"); Scelta v. Delicatessen Support Services, Inc., 57 F.Supp. 2d 1327, 1358-59 (M.D. Fla. 1999) (allegation that defendant attempted to put his hands down plaintiff's dress, and that there was an actual and intentional touching, sufficient to state a claim for battery); Hogan v. Tavzel, 660 So.2d 350 (Ha. 5th DCA 1995) (tortfeasor may be liable for battery for infecting another with a sexually transmitted disease); see also Restatement (Second) of Torts** Assault, § 21 (1965) (stating that an assault occurs when a person "acts intending to cause a harmful or offensive contact with the
+
+<sup>=</sup>Chapter 800 of the Florida Statutes is mentioned in the Complaint 118) because conduct against a person in violation of the criminal laws of the State generally give rise to a civil claim for intentional tort. Count I does not purport to bring a separate civil claim for violation of a strictly criminal statute.
+
+<sup>3</sup> Assault and battery are closely related common law intentional torts that are commonly alleged together. See Herzfeld v. Herzfeld, 781 So.2d 1070 (Fla.2001) (noting that laintiff alleged intentional tort of "assault and battery" based on allegations of sexual abuse). v. Atlantic Federal Savings & Loan 454 So.2d 52 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984) (holding that a cause of action for assault and battery cannot be based entirely on an omission).
+
+person of the other, or an imminent apprehension of such contact, and the other is thereby put in such imminent apprehension").
+
+4. Epstein's conduct as alleged in this case of masterbating during the massage, directing the Plaintiff to remove her clothes, and touching the Plaintiff, constitutes the intentional tort of assault and battery. Accordingly, even if the Complaint had not been amended, it sufficiently alleges facts establishing an assault and battery.
+
+Based on the foregoing, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is moot, and, in any event, not well founded, and therefore should be denied.
+
+Dated: September 22, 2008. Respectfully submitted,
+
+By: s/ Jeffrey M. Herman Jeffrey M. Herman (FL Bar No. 521647) jherman@hermanlaw.com Stuart S. Mermelstein (FL Bar No. 947245) ssm@hermanlaw.com Adam D. Horowitz (FL Bar No. 376980) ahorowitz@hermanlaw.com HERMAN & MERMELSTEIN, P.A. Attorneys for PlaintifsJane Doe 18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160 Tel: 305-931-2200 Fax: 305-931-0877
+
+## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
+
+I hereby certify that on September 22, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day to all parties on the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those parties who are not authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing.
+
+/s/ Jeffrey M. Herman
+
+## SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/ United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. iuoldberuer@auwria.com
+
+Michael R. Tein, Esq. tein@lewistein.com
+
+Robert D. Critton, Esq. rcritton@bciclaw.com
+
+Michael Pike, Esq. mpike@bciclaw.com
+
+/s/ Jeffrey M. Herman
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739396/EFTA02739396.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739396/EFTA02739396.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ffd36b4dda4fa88fd4edc2b5af6f5da8b1e55016
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739396/EFTA02739396.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,307 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739396.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 5,
+  "chars": 5892,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.02,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            405.95098876953125,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            405.95098876953125,
+            115.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            115.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "PLAINTIFF'S MEMORANDUM IN RESPONSE \nTO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            175.64399999999998,
+            295.65
+          ],
+          [
+            436.8489685058594,
+            295.65
+          ],
+          [
+            436.8489685058594,
+            325.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            175.64399999999998,
+            325.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            227.052,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            385.7200622558594,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            385.7200622558594,
+            100.56353759765625
+          ],
+          [
+            227.052,
+            100.56353759765625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "SERVICE LIST \nDOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN \nCASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/ \nUnited States District Court, Southern District of Florida",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            157.28400000000002,
+            85.05
+          ],
+          [
+            455.1346740722656,
+            85.05
+          ],
+          [
+            455.1346740722656,
+            143.2330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            157.28400000000002,
+            143.2330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            62
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            30
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            84
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            30
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            24
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            33
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            17
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739396"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739401/EFTA02739401.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739401/EFTA02739401.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8df83f7139e6e03056dad72b506dadbd6104b596
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739401/EFTA02739401.md
@@ -0,0 +1,122 @@
+### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+# AMENDED COMPLAINT
+
+Plaintiff, Jane Doe No.3 ("Jane" or "Jane Doc"), brings this Complaint against Jeffrey Epstein, as follows:
+
+# Parties, jurisdiction and Venue
+
+- I. Jane Doe is a citizen and resident of the State of Florida, and is sui juris.
+- 2. This Complaint is brought under a fictitious name to protect the identity of the Plaintiff because this Complaint makes sensitive allegations of sexual assault and abuse upon her when she was a minor.
+  - 3. Defendant Jeffrey Epstein is a citizen and resident of the State of New York.
+  - 4. This is an action for damages in excess of \$50 million.
+- 5. This Court has jurisdiction of this action and the claims set forth herein pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1332(a), as the matter in controversy (i) exceeds \$75,000, exclusive of interest and costs; and (ii) is between citizens of different states.
+- 6. This Court has venue of this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1391(a) as a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred in this District.
+
+# Factual Alleeations
+
+7. At all relevant times, Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") was an adult male, 52 years old. Epstein is a financier and money manager with a secret clientele limited exclusively to billionaires. He is himself a man of tremendous wealth, power and influence. He maintains his principal home in New York and also owns residences in New Mexico, St. and Palm Beach, FL. The allegations herein concern Epstein's conduct while at his lavish estate in Palm Beach.
+
+8. Upon information and belief, Epstein has a sexual preference and obsession for underage minor girls. He engaged in a plan and scheme in which he gained access to primarily economically disadvantaged minor girls in his home, sexually assaulted these girls, and then gave them money. In or about 2004-2005, Jane Doe, then 16 years old, fell into Epstein's trap and became one of his victims.
+
+9. Upon information and belief, Jeffrey Epstein carried out his scheme and assaulted girls in Florida, New York and on his private island, known as Little St. James. in St.
+
+10. An integral player in Epstein's Florida scheme was . a Palm Beach Community College student from Loxahatchee, Florida. She recruited girls ostensibly to give a wealthy man a massage for monetary compensation in his Palm Beach mansion. Under Epstein's plan, would be contacted when Epstein was planning to be at his Palm Beach residence or soon after he had arrived there. Epstein or someone on his behalf directed to bring one or more underage girls to the residence. , upon information and belief, generally sought out economically disadvantaged underage girls from Loxahatchee and surrounding areas who would be enticed by the money being offered - generally \$200 to \$300 per "massage" session - and who were perceived as less likely to complain to authorities or have credibility if allegations of improper conduct were made. This was an important element of Epstein's plan.
+
+II. Epstein's plan and scheme reflected a particular pattern and method. Upon arrival at Epstein's mansion, the victim would be brought to the kitchen. She would then be led up a flight of stairs to a bedroom that contained a massage table in addition to other furnishings. Once the girl was alone in this room, Epstein would enter wearing only a towel to cover his private area. He then would lay down on the massage table and perform one or more lewd, lascivious and sexual acts, including masturbation and touching the girl sexually.
+
+12. Consistent with the foregoing plan and scheme, recruited Jane Doe to give Epstein a massage for monetary compensation. brought Jane to Epstein's mansion in Palm Beach. Jane was led up the flight of stairs to the room with the massage table. She was alone in the room when Epstein arrived wearing a towel to cover his private parts. He laid down on the massage table, and sexually assaulted Jane Doe during the massage. In addition, Jeffrey Epstein masturbated during the massage.
+
+13. After Epstein had completed the assault, he left the room. Jane was then able to leave the room and go back down the stairs. She then met again who brought Jane home. Jane was paid \$200 by Epstein. was also paid by Epstein for bringing Jane to him.
+
+14. As a result of this encounter with Epstein, the 16-year old Jane experienced trauma, shock, confusion, shame, humiliation and embarrassment.
+
+#### COUNT I Sexual Assault and Batten,
+
+15. Plaintiff Jane Doe repeats and realleges paragraphs 1 through 14 above.
+
+16. Epstein acted with intent to cause an offensive contact with Jane Doe, or an imminent apprehension of such a contact, and Jane Doe was thereby put in such imminent apprehension.
+
+17. Epstein made an intentional. unlawful offer of offensive sexual contact toward Jane
+
+Doe, creating a reasonable fear of imminent peril.
+
+18. Epstein intentionally inflicted harmful or offensive contact on the person of Jane Doe, with the intent to cause such contact or the apprehension that such contact is imminent.
+
+19. Epstein tortiously committed a sexual assault and battery on Jane Doe. Epstein's acts were intentional, unlawful, offensive and harmful.
+
+20. Epstein's plan and scheme in which he committed such acts upon Jane Doe were done willfully and maliciously.
+
+21. As a direct and proximate result of Epstein's assault on Jane, she has suffered and will continue to suffer severe and permanent traumatic injuries, including mental, psychological and emotional damages.
+
+WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 3 demands judgment against Defendant Jeffrey Epstein for compensatory damages, punitive damages, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper.
+
+#### COUNT II Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress
+
+22. Plaintiff Jane Doe repeats and realleges paragraphs 1 through 14 above.
+
+23. Epstein's conduct was intentional or reckless.
+
+24. Epstein's conduct with a minor was extreme and outrageous, going beyond all bounds of decency.
+
+25. Epstein committed willful acts of child sexual abuse on Jane Doe. These acts resulted in mental or sexual injury to Jane Doe, that caused or were likely to cause Jane Doe's mental or emotional health to be significantly impaired.
+
+26. Epstein's conduct caused severe emotional distress to Jane Doe. Epstein knew or had
+
+reason to know that his intentional and outrageous conduct would cause emotional distress and damage to Jane Doe, or Epstein acted with reckless disregard of the high probability of causing severe emotional distress to Jane Doe.
+
+27. As a direct and proximate result of Epstein's intentional or reckless conduct, Jane Doe, has suffered and will continue to suffer severe mental anguish and pain.
+
+WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 3 demands judgment against Defendant Jeffrey Epstein for compensatory damages, costs, punitive damages, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper.
+
+### COUNT III Coercion and Enticement to Sexual Activity in Violation of 18 US.C. §2422
+
+28. Plaintiff Jane Doe repeats and realleges paragraphs 1 through 14 above.
+
+29. Epstein used a facility or means of interstate commerce to knowingly persuade, induce or entice Jane Doe, when she was under the age of 18 years, to engage in prostitution or sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense.
+
+30. Epstein's acts and conduct are in violation of 18 U.S.C. §2422.
+
+31. As a result of Epstein's violation of 18 U.S.C. §2422, Plaintiff has suffered personal injury, including mental, psychological and emotional damages.
+
+32. Plaintiff hired Herman & Mermelstein, P.A., in this matter and agreed to pay them a reasonable attorneys' fee.
+
+WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 3 demands judgment against Defendant Jeffrey Epstein for all damages available under 28 U.S.C. §2255(a), including without limitation, actual and compensatory damages, costs of suit, and attorneys' fees, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper.
+
+# JURY TRIAL DEMAND
+
+Plaintiff demands a jury trial in this action on all claims so triable.
+
+Dated: September 22, 2008
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+By: s/ Jeffrey M. Herman Jeffrey M. Herman (FL Bar No. 521647) iherman@hermanlaw.com Stuart S. Mermelstein (FL Bar No. 947245) ssm@hermanlaw.com Adam D. Horowitz (FL Bar No. 376980) ahorowitz@hermanlaw.com HERMAN & MERMELSTEIN, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiff 18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160 Tel: 305-931-2200 Fax: 305-931-0877
+
+# CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
+
+I hereby certify that on September 22, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day to all parties on the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those parties who are not authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing.
+
+/s/ Jeffrey M. Herman
+
+#### SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRa United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
+
+J Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. igoldberger@ampa.com
+
+Michael R. Tein, Esq. tein@lewistein.com
+
+Robert D. Critton, Esq. rcritton@bciclaw.com
+
+Michael Pike, Esq. mpike@bciclaw.com
+
+/s/ Jeffrey M. Herman
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739401/EFTA02739401.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739401/EFTA02739401.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..922611e52251e04b0017b355bb3266480aeddd90
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739401/EFTA02739401.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,567 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739401.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 8,
+  "chars": 9482,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.45,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            405.95098876953125,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            405.95098876953125,
+            115.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            115.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "AMENDED COMPLAINT",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            233.784,
+            295.65
+          ],
+          [
+            379.20025634765625,
+            295.65
+          ],
+          [
+            379.20025634765625,
+            310.863037109375
+          ],
+          [
+            233.784,
+            310.863037109375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Parties, jurisdiction and Venue",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            222.15599999999998,
+            379.89
+          ],
+          [
+            389.6434020996094,
+            379.89
+          ],
+          [
+            389.6434020996094,
+            394.863037109375
+          ],
+          [
+            222.15599999999998,
+            394.863037109375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Factual Alleeations",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            253.98,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            359.3172912597656,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            359.3172912597656,
+            100.93353271484375
+          ],
+          [
+            253.98,
+            100.93353271484375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "COUNT I \nSexual Assault and Batten,",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            233.784,
+            561.3299999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            376.992,
+            561.3299999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            376.992,
+            590.3035125732422
+          ],
+          [
+            233.784,
+            590.3035125732422
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "COUNT II \nIntentional Infliction of Emotional Distress",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            192.168,
+            450.36
+          ],
+          [
+            419.5736083984375,
+            450.36
+          ],
+          [
+            419.5736083984375,
+            478.863037109375
+          ],
+          [
+            192.168,
+            478.863037109375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "COUNT III \nCoercion and Enticement to Sexual Activity in Violation of 18 US.C. \u00a72422",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            110.77199999999999,
+            310.23
+          ],
+          [
+            501.763671875,
+            310.23
+          ],
+          [
+            501.763671875,
+            339.7330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            110.77199999999999,
+            339.7330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "JURY TRIAL DEMAND",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            238.68,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            373.97454833984375,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            373.97454833984375,
+            101.2330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            238.68,
+            101.2330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            227.052,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            385.0019836425781,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            385.0019836425781,
+            100.863037109375
+          ],
+          [
+            227.052,
+            100.863037109375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "SERVICE LIST \nDOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN \nCASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRa \nUnited States District Court, Southern District of Florida",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            157.28400000000002,
+            85.05
+          ],
+          [
+            455.6502685546875,
+            85.05
+          ],
+          [
+            455.6502685546875,
+            142.93353271484375
+          ],
+          [
+            157.28400000000002,
+            142.93353271484375
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            56
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            56
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            11
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            9
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            40
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            20
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            23
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            31
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            16
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739401"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739409/EFTA02739409.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739409/EFTA02739409.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..466608941de2141952de5eed894602d1a3f5db64
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739409/EFTA02739409.md
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO. 08-80232-CIV-MARRA
+
+Jane Doe No. 3,
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## ORDER DENYING MOTIONS AS MOOT
+
+THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Defendant's Motion for Enlargement of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint (DE 9) and Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Complaint (DE 35). As Plaintiff's Complaint has been replaced by an Amended Complaint, it is hereby
+
+ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:
+
+(1) Defendant's Motion for Enlargement of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint (DE 9) is DENIED as moot.
+
+(2) Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Complaint (DE 35) is DENIED as moot. This denial is without prejudice to Defendant reasserting the grounds asserted in the motion if he deems it appropriate as to the Amended Complaint.
+
+DONE AND ORDERED in at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 23rd day of September, 2008.
+
+> KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge
+
+copies to: All counsel of record
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739409/EFTA02739409.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739409/EFTA02739409.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4924e595530420c8471fc65e53d04dd0a273c38f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739409/EFTA02739409.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739409.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 1,
+  "chars": 1010,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 0.72,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            206.856,
+            72.08999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            405.5581359863281,
+            72.08999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            405.5581359863281,
+            100.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            206.856,
+            100.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "ORDER DENYING MOTIONS AS MOOT",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            191.55599999999998,
+            269.73
+          ],
+          [
+            420.85076904296875,
+            269.73
+          ],
+          [
+            420.85076904296875,
+            284.9830627441406
+          ],
+          [
+            191.55599999999998,
+            284.9830627441406
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            55
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739409"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739410/EFTA02739410.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739410/EFTA02739410.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4432667a8853357c23a5eb7314efa55244013a77
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739410/EFTA02739410.md
@@ -0,0 +1,211 @@
+#### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 4, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRA,
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 5, CASE NO.: 08-CV-8038I-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+# JOINT SCHEDULING AND DISCOVERY REPORT
+
+Plaintiffs, Jane Doe No. 2, Jane Doe No. 3, Jane Doe No. 4 and Jane Doe No. 5, and Defendant Jeffrey Epstein, submit this Joint Scheduling and Discovery Reports in accordance with this Court's Order Requiring Counsel to Confer, file Joint Scheduling Report and file Joint Discovery Report, and S.D.Fla.L.R. 16.1(B)(2) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(f), as follows:
+
+# I. DISCOVERY REPORT
+
+# A. Disclosures Under Rule 26(a)
+
+The parties propose to exchange initial disclosures under Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a) on or before October 17, 2008.
+
+# B. Conduct of Discovery
+
+# 1. Discovery and Pretrial Deadlines
+
+The parties propose the following discovery and pre-trial deadlines:
+
+Joinder of parties and Amendment of pleadings
+
+Parties to exchange list of fact witnesses and expert witness summaries/reports required by S.D.Fla.L.R. 16.1E
+
+Mediation to be completed
+
+Completion of Discovery
+
+Dispositive Motions to be Filed
+
+Joint Pretrial Statement to be Filed pursuant to S.D.Fla.L.R. 16.1E
+
+Propose pre-trial conference
+
+Proposed Trial
+
+December 1, 2008
+
+June 1, 2009
+
+July I, 2009
+
+August 1, 2009
+
+August 20, 2009
+
+September 25, 2009
+
+October, 2009
+
+November, 2009
+
+The submission of one Joint Scheduling and Discovery Report for the four cases is not intended to be an agreement or admission regarding whether these cases should be consolidated for any purpose. See §II(D) below.
+
+# Number of days estimated for jury trial 10
+
+#### 2. Subjects of Discovery and Whether Discovery Should be Phased or Limited to Particular Issues
+
+Plaintiffs' Position: There are no unusual issues at this time which require bifurcation or special restrictions on the scope of discovery or the subjects of discovery. Such issues may arise, however, as discovery continues. It is suggested that no restrictions on discovery be imposed at the outset of discovery.
+
+Defendant's Position: Any financial discovery, if allowed, relating to a punitive damage should be postponed until May 15, 2009. As well, as set forth in §D below, Defendant will request an order approving a confidentiality agreement governing access to and use of said information by Plaintiff and her attorneys until such time as documents/testimony is admitted at trial.
+
+# C. Issues About Disclosure of Electronically Stored Information
+
+The parties do not know whether issues may arise concerning discovery of electronically stored information. At this time, such discovery may be produced in paper or electronic form, subject to further order of the Court as may be necessary as discovery proceeds.
+
+# D. Issues About Claims of Privilege or Confidentiality
+
+Plaintiffs' Position: Plaintiffs request that their identities remain anonymous in this proceeding because they have alleged that they were victims of sexual misconduct as minors. Papers and exhibits filed with the Court should redact the names of the Plaintiffs or otherwise be filed under seal.
+
+Defendant's Position: Defendant may oppose anonymity in that Defendant will be prejudiced in defending himself and conducting his discovery without the ability to disclose Plaintiffs name(s), such as at depositions, subpoenaing medical/health related information, school records, etc. As well, Defendant's counsel has found that disclosure of a Plaintiff's name (who previously filed anonymously) oftentimes produces invaluable and otherwise relevant and material discovery.
+
+Defendant will request a confidentiality agreement with restrictions on any financial discovery which this court may allow. Defendant may assert his Fifth Amendment privilege in this matter.
+
+#### E. Limitations Imposed by the Discovery Rules
+
+Plaintiffs' Position: Plaintiffs request that the limitation of 10 depositions for each party under Fed.R.Civ.P. 30(a)(2) be removed. Plaintiffs intend to take the depositions of other minor victims of Defendant Epstein, who are numerous. There is no need at this time to alter other limitations imposed by the discovery rules.
+
+Defendant's Position: Defendant would request that the number of 10 deposition limit be imposed, pending a motion by either side setting forth justification for additional depositions.
+
+### F. Other Orders that the Court Should Issue Under Rule 26(c) or Rule 16(b) and (c)
+
+No other orders appear necessary at this time except as set forth above.
+
+### II. CONFERENCE REPORT
+
+#### A. Likelihood of Settlement
+
+The parties have not to date engaged in settlement discussions. They are, however, willing to explore the prospects for settlement through mediation or otherwise as the case proceeds forward.
+
+### B. Likelihood of Appearance of Additional Parties
+
+It does not appear that additional parties will appear in this case. However, the parties reserve the right to join additional parties within the deadline set forth in §1(B), if appropriate.
+
+# C. Proposed Time Limits
+
+Proposed time limits are set forth in the Discovery Plan, §I(B) above.
+
+### D. Proposals for the Formulation and Simplification of Issues
+
+Plaintiffs' Position: It would be in the interests of judicial economy and efficiency to consolidate these cases at least for purposes of discovery. Plaintiffs have no other proposals for the formulation and simplification of issues at this time.
+
+Defendant's Position: Defendant is opposed to consolidation of the cases for any purpose at this time. Should Plaintiff file a motion, Defendant will consider the request and respond.
+
+# E. Necessity or Desirability of Amendments to the Pleadings
+
+Plaintiff's filed Amended Complaints in each case on September 22, 2008. Plaintiffs do not believe at this time that further amendment will be necessary. The parties however reserve the right to amend pleadings within the deadline set forth in §1(B) above.
+
+### F. Possibility of Obtaining Admissions of Fact and of Documents; Stipulations; Need for Advance Ruling on Admissibility of Evidence
+
+Plaintiffs' Position: Plaintiffs believe that Defendant Epstein's plea agreement is an admission of liability as to all Counts of the Amended Complaint. Plaintiff's request an early ruling by the Court on the affect of the plea agreement, which will simplify the issues. Additionally, Plaintiffs believe that it is appropriate to have an advance evidentiary ruling on similar fact evidence. If the parties know early in the case how similar fact evidence will be treated at trial, discovery can be more focused and efficient.
+
+Defendant's Position: Defendant expects that the parties will work together to arrive at admissions as the matter progresses. Defendant disagrees that Defendant's plea agreement is an admission as described by Plaintiff. Defendant does agree that having an advance ruling on similar fact evidence may be desirable, after motion and ability to brief and respond.
+
+#### G. Suggestions for the Avoidance of Unnecessary Proof and of Cumulative Evidence
+
+There are no suggestions at this time for the avoidance of unnecessary proof or of cumulative evidence.
+
+#### H. Suggestion on the Advisability of Referring Matters to a Magistrate Judge or
+
+It is suggested that discovery matters be referred to a Magistrate Judge.
+
+### Preliminary Estimate of the Time Required for Trial
+
+It is estimated that the trial will require ten (10) days.
+
+# J. Requested Date or Dates for Pre Trial Conference and Trial
+
+Dates are set forth in the proposed discovery plan §I(B) above.
+
+#### K. Other Information
+
+There is no other information that might be helpful to the Court at this early date regarding setting the case for status conference or pm trial conference.
+
+Dated: September 25, 2008.
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+By: s/ Jeffrey M. Herman Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Jeffrey Marc Herman, Esq. Stuart S. Mennelstein, Esq. 18205 Biscayne Boulevard Suite 2218 Miami, FL 33160 305-931-2200 Fax: 305-931-0877 ahorowitz@hermanlaw.com jherman@hermanlaw.com lrivera@hermanlaw.com Counsel for Plaintiffs Jane Doe #2 - #5
+
+By: s/ Jack Alan Goldberger Jack Alan Goldberger Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 561-659-8300 Fax: 561-835-8691 jagesq@bellsouth.net Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
+
+By: s/ Michael R. Tein Michael R. Tein, Esq. Tein, P.L.
+
+By: s/ Robert D. Critton
+
+Robert D. Critton, Jr., Esq.
+
+Florida Bar No. 224162
+
+rcrit@bciclaw.com
+
+Michael J. Pike, Esq.
+
+Florida Bar #617296
+
+mpike@bcIclaw.com
+
+Burman, Critton, Luther & Coleman,
+
+515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400
+
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+
+561/842-2820 Phone
+
+561/515-3148 Fax
+
+Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
+
+3059 Grand Avenue, Suite 340
+
+Coconut Grove, FL 33133
+
+305-442-1101
+
+Fax: 305 442 6744
+
+Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
+
+tein@lewistein.com
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739410/EFTA02739410.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739410/EFTA02739410.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e153bbf7e3cac30bfc77e82e40f0086c5bcdc711
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739410/EFTA02739410.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,843 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739410.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 7,
+  "chars": 9117,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.69,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            405.95098876953125,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            405.95098876953125,
+            100.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            100.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "JOINT SCHEDULING AND DISCOVERY REPORT",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            165.24,
+            672.3
+          ],
+          [
+            447.4479064941406,
+            672.3
+          ],
+          [
+            447.4479064941406,
+            687.7330169677734
+          ],
+          [
+            165.24,
+            687.7330169677734
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "I. DISCOVERY REPORT",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            222.768,
+            183.06
+          ],
+          [
+            389.7190856933594,
+            183.06
+          ],
+          [
+            389.7190856933594,
+            198.7330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            222.768,
+            198.7330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "A. Disclosures Under Rule 26(a)",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            210.52799999999996,
+            211.41
+          ],
+          [
+            401.9444885253906,
+            211.41
+          ],
+          [
+            401.9444885253906,
+            226.863037109375
+          ],
+          [
+            210.52799999999996,
+            226.863037109375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "B. Conduct of Discovery",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            230.11199999999997,
+            294.84000000000003
+          ],
+          [
+            382.11114501953125,
+            294.84000000000003
+          ],
+          [
+            382.11114501953125,
+            310.4830627441406
+          ],
+          [
+            230.11199999999997,
+            310.4830627441406
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "1. Discovery and Pretrial Deadlines",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            200.73600000000002,
+            323.19
+          ],
+          [
+            412.03253173828125,
+            323.19
+          ],
+          [
+            412.03253173828125,
+            338.60302734375
+          ],
+          [
+            200.73600000000002,
+            338.60302734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Number of days estimated for jury trial 10",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            105.87599999999998,
+            85.05
+          ],
+          [
+            446.95416259765625,
+            85.05
+          ],
+          [
+            446.95416259765625,
+            100.863037109375
+          ],
+          [
+            105.87599999999998,
+            100.863037109375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "2. Subjects of Discovery and Whether Discovery \nShould be Phased or Limited to Particular Issues",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            168.3,
+            113.4
+          ],
+          [
+            452.9078063964844,
+            113.4
+          ],
+          [
+            452.9078063964844,
+            142.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            168.3,
+            142.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "C. Issues About Disclosure of Electronically Stored Information",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            129.744,
+            379.08000000000004
+          ],
+          [
+            483.0190124511719,
+            379.08000000000004
+          ],
+          [
+            483.0190124511719,
+            394.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            129.744,
+            394.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "D. Issues About Claims of Privilege or Confidentiality",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            154.836,
+            490.86
+          ],
+          [
+            457.64141845703125,
+            490.86
+          ],
+          [
+            457.64141845703125,
+            506.9830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            154.836,
+            506.9830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "E. Limitations Imposed by the Discovery Rules",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            171.972,
+            239.76
+          ],
+          [
+            440.51019287109375,
+            239.76
+          ],
+          [
+            440.51019287109375,
+            254.2330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            171.972,
+            254.2330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "F. Other Orders that the Court Should Issue \nUnder Rule 26(c) or Rule 16(b) and (c)",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            177.48,
+            434.97
+          ],
+          [
+            434.70513916015625,
+            434.97
+          ],
+          [
+            434.70513916015625,
+            464.9830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            177.48,
+            464.9830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "II. CONFERENCE REPORT",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            216.64799999999997,
+            505.43999999999994
+          ],
+          [
+            395.3279113769531,
+            505.43999999999994
+          ],
+          [
+            395.3279113769531,
+            520.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            216.64799999999997,
+            520.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "A. Likelihood of Settlement",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            222.15599999999998,
+            533.79
+          ],
+          [
+            389.8231201171875,
+            533.79
+          ],
+          [
+            389.8231201171875,
+            548.2330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            222.15599999999998,
+            548.2330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "B. Likelihood of Appearance of Additional Parties",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            164.01600000000002,
+            618.03
+          ],
+          [
+            448.9296569824219,
+            618.03
+          ],
+          [
+            448.9296569824219,
+            632.9830169677734
+          ],
+          [
+            164.01600000000002,
+            632.9830169677734
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "C. Proposed Time Limits",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            229.5,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            384.80322265625,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            384.80322265625,
+            86.68353271484375
+          ],
+          [
+            229.5,
+            86.68353271484375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "D. Proposals for the Formulation and Simplification of Issues",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            135.864,
+            127.17
+          ],
+          [
+            477.0312805175781,
+            127.17
+          ],
+          [
+            477.0312805175781,
+            142.18353271484375
+          ],
+          [
+            135.864,
+            142.18353271484375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "E. Necessity or Desirability of Amendments to the Pleadings",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            138.312,
+            294.84000000000003
+          ],
+          [
+            474.0537414550781,
+            294.84000000000003
+          ],
+          [
+            474.0537414550781,
+            310.1835632324219
+          ],
+          [
+            138.312,
+            310.1835632324219
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "F. Possibility of Obtaining Admissions of Fact and of Documents; \nStipulations; Need for Advance Ruling on Admissibility of Evidence",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            124.848,
+            406.62
+          ],
+          [
+            500.63995361328125,
+            406.62
+          ],
+          [
+            500.63995361328125,
+            436.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            124.848,
+            436.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "G. Suggestions for the Avoidance of \nUnnecessary Proof and of Cumulative Evidence",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            197.06400000000002,
+            72.08999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            451.5443115234375,
+            72.08999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            451.5443115234375,
+            100.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            197.06400000000002,
+            100.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "H. Suggestion on the Advisability of Referring \nMatters to a Magistrate Judge or",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            175.03199999999998,
+            170.1
+          ],
+          [
+            437.9033508300781,
+            170.1
+          ],
+          [
+            437.9033508300781,
+            198.7330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            175.03199999999998,
+            198.7330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Preliminary Estimate of the Time Required for Trial",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            150.552,
+            239.76
+          ],
+          [
+            462.21832275390625,
+            239.76
+          ],
+          [
+            462.21832275390625,
+            254.60302734375
+          ],
+          [
+            150.552,
+            254.60302734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "J. Requested Date or Dates for Pre Trial Conference and Trial",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            131.57999999999998,
+            295.65
+          ],
+          [
+            480.96832275390625,
+            295.65
+          ],
+          [
+            480.96832275390625,
+            311.2330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            131.57999999999998,
+            311.2330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "K. Other Information",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            237.45600000000002,
+            352.35
+          ],
+          [
+            374.9915771484375,
+            352.35
+          ],
+          [
+            374.9915771484375,
+            366.363037109375
+          ],
+          [
+            237.45600000000002,
+            366.363037109375
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            49
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            20
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            77
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            38
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            19
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            59
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            55
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            64
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            89
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            45
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            44
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            22
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            19
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739410"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739417/EFTA02739417.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739417/EFTA02739417.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..202783b7a42705b1bf93e3b61d8c090786aa17bf
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739417/EFTA02739417.md
@@ -0,0 +1,158 @@
+# UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 2,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 4,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 5,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+CASE NO. 08-80119-CIV-MARRA,
+
+CASE NO. 08-80232-CIV-MARRA
+
+CASE NO. 08-80380-CIV-MARRA
+
+CASE NO. 08-80381-CIV-MARRA
+
+#### ORDER SETTING TRIAL DATE & DISCOVERY DEADLINES, REFERRING CASE TO MEDIATION & REFERRING DISCOVERY MOTIONS TO UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
+
+THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon receipt of the parties' joint scheduling report.
+
+It is thereupon, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:
+
+#### Trial Date & Location
+
+1. This case is set for trial on the two-week calendar commencing Monday, January 25, 2010. Counsel for all parties shall appear at a calendar call commencing at 10:00 o'clock A.M. on Friday, January 22, 2010. Unless instructed otherwise by subsequent order, the trial and all other proceedings in this case shall be conducted at the U.S. Courthouse, 701 Clematis Street, Courtroom 4, Third Floor, West Palm Beach, Florida.
+
+#### Motion Practice
+
+2. Every motion filed in this case will be accompanied by one proposed original order granting the motion. The order will contain an up-to-date service list of all attorneys in the case, including e-mail addresses.
+
+## Pretrial Schedule
+
+3. Pretrial discovery will be conducted in accordance with Local Rules 16.1 and 26.1 and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. No pretrial conference shall be held in this action, unless the Court determines, either sua sponte or upon motion and order, that a pretrial conference is necessary. In setting the following deadlines, the Court has considered the parties' suggested discovery schedule. Dates and other agreements between the parties not otherwise addressed herein shall be considered part of this Order. To the extent this Order conflicts with the Local Rules, this Order supercedes the Local Rules.
+
+Amend Pleadings/Add Parties -December 1, 2008
+
+Discovery Cutoff —August 3, 2009
+
+Substantive Pretrial Motions —August 31, 2009
+
+Mediation Cutoff
+
+Mandatory Pretrial Stipulation
+
+Motions in Limine
+
+Responses to Motions in Limine
+
+Jury Instructions
+
+Proposed Findings & Conclusions
+
+your Dire Questions
+
+Exhibit List for Court
+
+Witness List for Court
+
+60 days before calendar call
+
+-Fifteen days before calendar call
+
+— Fifteen days before calendar call
+
+— Ten days before calendar call
+
+— Five days before calendar call
+
+— Five days before calendar call
+
+— Calendar call
+
+— First day of Trial (impeachment excepted)
+
+— First day of Trial (impeachment excepted)
+
+# Mandatory Pretrial Stipulation
+
+4. Counsel must meet at least one month prior to the beginning of the trial period to confer on the preparation of a Pretrial Stipulation in accordance with Local Rule 16.1E.
+
+A Pretrial Stipulation lacking substance will not be accepted. Any party causing a unilateral pretrial stipulation to be filed will be required to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed. Each attorney and each self-represented party is charged with the duty of complying with this Order. A motion for continuance shall not stay the requirement for the filing of the Pretrial Stipulation and, unless an emergency situation arises, or good cause is shown, a motion for continuance will not be considered unless it is filed at least twenty (20) days prior to the calendar call. Failure to comply with the time schedule may result in dismissal or other sanctions.
+
+## Consent Jurisdiction
+
+5. In light of the benefits offered by a trial before a magistrate judge, a, trial on a date certain as opposed to placement on a trial calendar, the panics arc urged to consider this option. Therefore, within twenty (20) days of the entry of this order each attorney is ordered to meet with his or her client and discuss this option. Plaintiff's counsel shall monitor this process. If there is not unanimity in favor of magistrate jurisdiction, plaintiff's counsel need do nothing further. lf, however, there is unanimity in favor of magistrate jurisdiction, plaintiff's counsel shall execute the form (which can be retrieved from www.flsd.uscourts.gov) entitled "Notice of Right to Consent to Disposition of a Civil Case by a United States Magistrate Judge," and forward the original, executed form to defendants' counsel. After completion by all defendants or their counsel, the original form should be forwarded to the Clerk of the Court, West Palm Beach Division.
+
+## Mediation
+
+6. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16 and Local Rule 16.2, this case is referred to mediation, to the extent not excluded by Local Rule 16.2.C, as follows:
+
+- a. The mediation shall be completed sixty (60) days prior to the scheduled calendar call;
+- b. The parties shall, within sixty (60) days hereof, agree upon a mediator and advise the Clerk's office of their choice, failing which the Clerk will designate a mediator from the list of certified mediators on a blind random basis;
+- c. Plaintiff's counsel shall be responsible for coordinating the mediation conference date and location agreeable to the mediator and all counsel of record;
+- d. Within five (5) days following the mediation conference, the mediator shall file a Mediation Report indicating who attended the mediation and the result thereof.
+
+## Discovery Referred to Magistrate Judge
+
+7. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636 and the Magistrate Rules of the Local Rules of the Southern District of Florida, the above-captioned cause is referred to United States Magistrate
+
+Judge Linnea R. for appropriate disposition of all pretrial discovery motions, and all motions that relate directly to these motions, such as motions for extension of time, motions for reconsideration, motions for sanctions, and motions for mental or physical examinations. This Order does not refer any motion which requests a continuance or extension of the trial or pretrial scheduling dates.
+
+## Exhibits
+
+8. Exhibits must be pre-marked and exchanged prior to execution of the Pretrial Stipulation. Each exhibit should be marked with a sticker identifying the case number, exhibit number, and party offering the exhibit.
+
+## Jury Instructions and Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
+
+9. In cases tried before a jury, each party shall submit joint, stipulated proposed jury instructions and a joint, stipulated proposed verdict form in hard copy form and on 3.5" diskette. All requested instructions shall be typed on a separate page, and except for Eleventh Circuit Pattern instructions, must be supported by citations of authority. Any objections to the proposed instructions shall be stated clearly and concisely and also shall be supported by citations of authority.
+
+In cases tried before the Court, each party shall file proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law in hard copy form and on 3.5" diskette. Proposed Conclusions of Law must be supported by citations of authority.
+
+#### Settlement
+
+10. If a case is settled, counsel are directed to inform the Court promptly at (561) 561-514- 3790 and to submit an appropriate Stipulation for Order of Dismissal, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(I). Such an Order must be filed within ten (10) days of notification to the Court, or prior to
+
+the Calendar Call, whichever occurs first. Cases arc not removed from the trial calendar unless a stipulation for dismissal is filed with the Court.
+
+DONE AND ORDERED in at West Palm Beach, Florida, this 29th day of September, 2008.
+
+KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge
+
+Copies furnished to:
+
+Magistrate Judge Linnea R. All counsel of record
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739417/EFTA02739417.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739417/EFTA02739417.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0855eea23b894d566e4577e5626c15d3a44df813
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739417/EFTA02739417.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,537 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739417.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 6,
+  "chars": 7711,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.62,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            208.692,
+            57.50999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            403.18975830078125,
+            57.50999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            403.18975830078125,
+            86.853515625
+          ],
+          [
+            208.692,
+            86.853515625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "ORDER SETTING TRIAL DATE & DISCOVERY DEADLINES, \nREFERRING CASE TO MEDIATION & REFERRING DISCOVERY MOTIONS TO \nUNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            83.844,
+            656.9100000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            525.578125,
+            656.9100000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            525.578125,
+            698.8535385131836
+          ],
+          [
+            83.844,
+            698.8535385131836
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Trial Date & Location",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            247.24800000000005,
+            115.1702880859375
+          ],
+          [
+            365.6606750488281,
+            115.1702880859375
+          ],
+          [
+            365.6606750488281,
+            128.947021484375
+          ],
+          [
+            247.24800000000005,
+            128.947021484375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Motion Practice",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            263.772,
+            282.68999999999994
+          ],
+          [
+            350.2125244140625,
+            282.68999999999994
+          ],
+          [
+            350.2125244140625,
+            296.5670471191406
+          ],
+          [
+            263.772,
+            296.5670471191406
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Pretrial Schedule",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            262.548,
+            393.65999999999997
+          ],
+          [
+            354.271240234375,
+            393.65999999999997
+          ],
+          [
+            354.271240234375,
+            407.9470520019531
+          ],
+          [
+            262.548,
+            407.9470520019531
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Mandatory Pretrial Stipulation",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            227.052,
+            336.15
+          ],
+          [
+            389.6287841796875,
+            336.15
+          ],
+          [
+            389.6287841796875,
+            350.83056640625
+          ],
+          [
+            227.052,
+            350.83056640625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Consent Jurisdiction",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            253.36799999999997,
+            615.5999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            363.06878662109375,
+            615.5999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            363.06878662109375,
+            629.83056640625
+          ],
+          [
+            253.36799999999997,
+            629.83056640625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Mediation",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            279.684,
+            281.88
+          ],
+          [
+            336.6300048828125,
+            281.88
+          ],
+          [
+            336.6300048828125,
+            296.1035461425781
+          ],
+          [
+            279.684,
+            296.1035461425781
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Discovery Referred to Magistrate Judge",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            205.02,
+            616.41
+          ],
+          [
+            411.5246887207031,
+            616.41
+          ],
+          [
+            411.5246887207031,
+            630.6035461425781
+          ],
+          [
+            205.02,
+            630.6035461425781
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Exhibits",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            285.192,
+            198.45000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            332.3708190917969,
+            198.45000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            332.3708190917969,
+            212.5670166015625
+          ],
+          [
+            285.192,
+            212.5670166015625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Jury Instructions and Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            123.62400000000002,
+            309.42
+          ],
+          [
+            493.3386535644531,
+            309.42
+          ],
+          [
+            493.3386535644531,
+            323.5670471191406
+          ],
+          [
+            123.62400000000002,
+            323.5670471191406
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Settlement",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            279.072,
+            588.87
+          ],
+          [
+            337.964599609375,
+            588.87
+          ],
+          [
+            337.964599609375,
+            602.5670318603516
+          ],
+          [
+            279.072,
+            602.5670318603516
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            61
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            31
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            59
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            71
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            36
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            21
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Caption",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739417"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739423/EFTA02739423.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739423/EFTA02739423.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..00720c0eac013f967d3a4d6fbc2fd9e8f5db06b1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739423/EFTA02739423.md
@@ -0,0 +1,142 @@
+#### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA I
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3
+
+Plaintiff, v.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN
+
+Defendant.
+
+#### DEFENDANT'S. EPSTEIN. MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT DIRECTED TO PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT
+
+Defendant, JEFFERY EPSTEIN, by and through his undersigned counsel, moves to dismiss and for more definite statement of Plaintiff JANE DOE NO. 3's Amended Complaint. Rules 12(b)(6), and 12(e) and (f), Fed.R.Civ.P. (2008). In support of his motion, Defendant states:
+
+### Introduction
+
+Defendant is filing similar motions to dismiss and for more definite statement directed to the Amended Complaints filed against Defendant in this Court in JANE DOE NO. 2, JANE DOE NO. 3, JANE DOE NO. 4 and JANE DOE NO. 5. The motions are directed to the Counts for "Sexual Assault and Battery," and "Coercion and Enticement to Sexual Activity in Violation of 18 U.S.C. §2422" in each of the respective complaints. However, there are distinctions in the four motions filed based on the complaint allegations. For example, Defendant challenges the Plaintiffs' allegations as to assault in all four actions, and challenges the battery allegations in JANE DOE NOS. 2 and 3, but not in JANE DOE NOS. 4 and 5. Defendant moves to dismiss the §2422 count in all four actions.
+
+### Motion
+
+1. Counts I and III of the Amended Complaint are required to be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Rule 12(b)(6). Plaintiff has failed to allege sufficient factual allegations in the Counts and instead alleges labels and conclusions, and an attempted formulaic recitation of the elements in each Count.
+
+2. In the alternative, Defendant seeks more definite statement of Count I and III. In Count I, the Plaintiff is required to more definitely allege what was done to her; what EPSTEIN said and did, if anything, to create fear and apprehension in Plaintiff; what was the intentional offensive or harmful contact in pleading the elements of assault and battery. In Count III, Plaintiff is required to more definitely state the underlying factual allegations to support her claim as set forth in the statute, 18 U.S.C. §2422(b) and §2455. Rule 12(e). See discussion of law below herein.
+
+3. Also, Plaintiffs reference in Count III to 28 U.S.C. §2255, pertaining to habeas corpus proceedings is required to be stricken as immaterial. Rule 12(f). Plaintiff is required to more definitely state what statutory provision she is relying on. Rule 12 (e).
+
+WHEREFORE, Defendant respectfully requests that this Court dismiss Counts I and III, strike the immaterial statutory reference, and require Plaintiff to more definitely plead the underlying elements of her claims.
+
+#### Supporting Memorandum of Law Standard on Rule 12(b)(6) Motion To Dismiss
+
+As established by the Supreme Court in Bell Atlantic Corp. V. Twombly, 127 S.Ct. 1955 (2007), a motion to dismiss should be granted if the plaintiff does not plead "enough facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face." Id, at 1974. Although the complaint need not provide detailed factual allegations, the basis for relief Case No. CV-80232-Marra Page No. 3
+
+in the complaint must state "more than labels and conclusions, and a formulaic recitation of the elements of a cause of action will not do." Id, at 1965. Further, "[f]actual allegations must be enough to raise a right to relief above the speculative level ... on the assumption that all the allegations in the complaint are true (even if doubtful in fact)." Id. On a motion to dismiss, the well pleaded allegations of plaintiffs complaint are taken as true and construed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. M.T.V. v. DeKalb County Sch. Dist., 446 F.3d 1153, 1156 (11th Cir.2006).
+
+Significantly, the Supreme Court in Bell Atlantic Corp. V. Twombly abrogated the often cited observation that "a complaint should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim unless it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove not set of facts in support of his claim that would entitle him to relief." Id, (abrogating and quoting Conley ya, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46, 78 S.Ct. 99, 102, 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957)). The Supreme Court rejected the notion that "a wholly conclusory statement of claim [can] survive a motion to dismiss whenever the pleadings le[ave] open the possibility that a plaintiff might later establish some 'set of [undisclosed] facts' to support recovery." Id. As explained by the Supreme Court in Bell Atlantic Corp., supra at 1664-65:
+
+While a complaint attacked by a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss does not need detailed factual allegations ibid.; Sanivan v. American Bd. of Psychiatry and Neurology, Inc. 40 F.3d 247, 251 (C.A.7 1994), a plaintiff's obligation to provide the "grounds" of his "entitle[ment] to relief requires more than labels and conclusions, and a formulaic recitation of the elements of a cause of action will not do, see Papasan v. Allain, 478 U.S. 265, 286, 106 S.Ct. 2932, 92 L.Ed.2d 209 (1986) (on a motion to dismiss, courts "are not bound to accept as true a legal conclusion couched as a factual allegation"). Factual allegations mu noug raise a right to relief above the speculative level, see 5 C. & A. M, Fed cti Procedure § 1216, pp. 235-236 (3d ed.2004) (hereinafter & ) ("[T]he pleading must contain something more ... than ... a statement of facts that merely creates a suspicion [of] a legally cognizable right of action"), on the assumption that all the allegations in the complaint are true (even if
+
+> doubtful in fact), see, e.g. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A., 534 U.S. 506, 508, n. 1, 122 S.Ct. 992, 152 L.Ed.2d 1 (2002); Neitzke v. 490 U.S. 319, 327, 109 S.Ct. 1827, 104 L.Ed.2d 338 (1989) (" u e )(6) does not countenance ... dismissals based on a judge's disbelief of a complaint's factual allegations"); Scheuer v. 416 U.S. 232, 236, 94 S.Ct. 1683, 40 L.Ed.2d 90 (1974) (a well-pea e complaint may proceed even if it appears "that a recovery is very remote and unlikely").
+
+Pursuant to Rule 12(e), a party may move for more definite statement of a pleading to which a responsive pleading is allowed where the pleading "is so vague or ambiguous that the party cannot reasonably frame a response." The motion is required to point out the defects and the desired details. Id.
+
+#### Count I — "Sexual Assault and Battery" is subiect to dismissal as Plaintiff has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
+
+It is well settled that this Court is to apply Florida substantive law in this action. Erie R.Co. v. Tompkins 58 S.Ct. 817 (1938). Pursuant to Florida law, although the term "assault and battery" is most commonly referred to as if it were a legal unit, or a single concept, "assault and battery are separate and distinct legal concepts, assault being the beginning of an act which, if consummated, constitutes battery." 3A FIa.Jur.2d Assault §1. An assault and battery are intentional acts. See generally, Spivey v. Battaglia, 258 So.2d 815 (Fla. 1972); and Travelers Indem. Co. v. PCR. Inc., 889 So.2d 779 (Fla. 2004).
+
+An "assault" is an intentional, unlawful offer of corporal injury to another by force, or exertion of force directed toward another under such circumstances as to create a reasonable fear of imminent peril. See Lav v. Kremer, 411 So.2d 1347 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). It must be premised upon an affirmative act - a threat to use force, or the actual exertion of force. See 3A FIa.Jur.2d Assault §1("The essential element of the tort of assault is the violence offered, and not actual physical contact.").
+
+Tort of "battery" consists of the infliction of a harmful or offensive contact upon another with the intent to cause such contact or the apprehension that such contact is imminent. Quilling v. Price 894 So.2d 1061 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005); v. Atlantic Federal Savings & Loan 454 So.2d 52 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984)("a battery consists of the intentional infliction of a harmful or offensive contact upon the person of another). See 3A Fla.Jur.2d Assault §1.
+
+With the standard of pleading established in Twomblv, supra, in the context of the elements for assault and battery, Plaintiff has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Rule 12(b)(6). As to the elements of assault, here are no factual allegations as to what was said or done to Plaintiff such that it constituted an "intentional, unlawful offer of corporal injury to another by force, or exertion of force directed toward another under such circumstances as to create a reasonable fear of imminent peril." See ¶12 of Am. Comp. The same is true for the claim of battery. Plaintiff makes the general allegation in ¶12 that "he (Defendant) laid down on the massage table, and sexually assaulted Jane during the massage." Under applicable law, Plaintiff is required to give more than labels and conclusions, and a formulaic recitation of the elements of a cause of action. Twomblv, supra. Plaintiff is required to allege the fads of what was done to her; what EPSTEIN said and did, if anything, to create fear and apprehension in Plaintiff; what was the intentional offensive or harmful contact?
+
+As noted in the introduction and as this Court is well aware, there is more than one action brought against this Defendant attempting to allege similar sounding claims. With all due respect, the details as to a particular claim asserted by a particular Plaintiff
+
+are important to give this Defendant fair notice of Plaintiff's claim so he may properly respond. Accordingly, under applicable law, Plaintiff has failed to state a claim for sexual assault and battery.
+
+In the alternative to dismissing Count I, Defendant requests that Plaintiff be required to give more definite statement as to what was done to her; what EPSTEIN said and did, if anything, to create fear and apprehension in Plaintiff; what was the intentional offensive or harmful contact in pleading the elements of assault and battery. Rule 12(e).
+
+Count ill — "Coercion and Enticement to Sexual Activity in Violation of 18 U.S.C. 42422" - is sublect to dismissal as Plaintiff has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Rule 12(3)(6). Count III also contains an immaterial reference to 28 U.S.C. 42255, which is required to be stricken and more definitely stated.
+
+Count III of Plaintiff's Complaint attempts to assert a claim for "Coercion and Enticement to Sexual Activity in Violation of 18 U.S.C. §2422." In her prayer for relief in Count III, Plaintiff "demands judgment against Defendant Jeffrey Epstein for all damages available under 28 U.S.C. §2255(a), ."
+
+Although the reference to "28 U.S.C. §2255," pertaining to habeas corpus proceedings - federal custody and remedies on motion attacking sentence, is probably a typographical error by Plaintiff, and the reference to "28" was meant to be "18," Defendant requests that Plaintiff correct this error so that Defendant may have fair notice of the claim Plaintiff is attempting to assert. Whether or not the "28" is typographical error, Defendant is still entitled to dismissal of the count.
+
+The applicable version of these statutory provisions, (pre-2006 Amendments, as the Amended Complaint alleges a time period of "in or about 2004-2005," ¶8), provides:
+
+### CHAPTER 117-TRANSPORTATION FOR ILLEGAL SEXUAL ACTIVITY AND RELATED CRIMES
+
+# § 2422. Coercion and enticement
+
+(a) Whoever knowingly persuades, induces, entices, or coerces any individual to travel in interstate or foreign commerce, or in any Territory or Possession of the United States, to engage in prostitution, or in any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense, or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.
+
+(b) Whoever, using the mail or any facility or means of interstate or foreign commerce, or within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States knowingly persuades, induces, entices, or coerces any individual who has not attained the age of 18 years, to engage in prostitution or any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense, or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title and imprisoned not less than 5 years and not more than 30 years.
+
+## CHAPTER 110-SEXUAL EXPLOITATION AND OTHER ABUSE OF CHILDREN
+
+# § 2255. Civil remedy for personal injuries
+
+(a) Any minor who is a victim of a violation of section 2241(c), 2242, 2243, 2251 2251A, 2252 2252A, 2260, 2421, 2422, or 2423 of this title and who suffers personal injury as a result of such violation may sue in any appropriate United States District Court and shall recover the actual damages such minor sustains and the cost of the suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee. Any minor as described in the preceding sentence shall be deemed to have sustained damages of no less than \$50,000 in value.
+
+(b) Any action commenced under this section shall be barred unless the complaint is filed within six years after the right of action first accrues or in the case of a person under a legal disability, not later than three years after the disability.
+
+Relevant to Plaintiffs complaint, 18 U.S.C. 2255(a) creates a civil remedy for "a minor who is a victim of a violation of section ... 2422 ... of this title and who suffers personal injury as a result of such violation ... ." Plaintiff has failed to plead any factual allegations whatsoever pertaining to violations of 18 U.S.C. 2422. Rather, Plaintiff has alleged conclusory allegations simply attempting to track parts of the statutory language
+
+in the statute without underlying factual allegations pertaining to the Plaintiff and any conduct by Defendant. See ¶29 of Am. Comp. Plaintiffs allegations, (or lack of factual allegations), are precisely what the standard set forth by the Supreme Court in Bell Atlantic Corp. prohibits — Plaintiffs complaint alleges only "labels and conclusions, and a (partial) formulaic recitation of the elements."
+
+First, the Amended Complaint fails to designate whether Plaintiff is relying on §2422(a) or §2422(b). Second, although the complaint does contain a partial tracking of the language in 18 U.S.C. §2422(b), it contains absolutely no factual allegations concerning the requisite "using the mail or any facility or means of interstate or foreign commerce" by Plaintiff to state a cause of action based on a violation of 18 U.S.C. 2422(b). As well, there are no underlying factual allegations involving this Plaintiff as to the requisite elements that a defendant knowingly persuaded, induced, enticed, or coerced any individual (Plaintiff in this case) who has not attained the age of 18 years, to engage in prostitution or any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense, or attempted to do so. See 18 U.S.C. 2422(b); i.e. with what criminal offense could Plaintiff and Defendant have been charged. Again, a Plaintiff cannot simply track the language of a statute without some underlying factual allegations to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Accordingly, Count III is required to be dismissed, and the reference to 28 USC 2455 be stricken.
+
+In the alternative, Plaintiff should be required to more definitely state the underlying factual allegations to support her claim as set forth in the statute, 18 U.S.C. §2422(b) and §2455.
+
+**Conclusion**
+
+As discussed above herein, under the pleading standard established in Twombly, supra, and law concerning the elements of Count I and III, Plaintiff has failed to state claims upon which relief can be granted. Rule 12(b)(6). Plaintiff's complaint lack underlying factual allegations and, thus, Plaintiff is required to more definitely state the requisite factual allegations. Finally, Plaintiff should correct any improper statutory references.
+
+**Certificate of Service**
+
+I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record identified on the following Service List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on this 6<sup>th</sup> day of October, 2008:
+
+Adam D. Horowitz, Esq.  
+Jeffrey Marc Herman, Esq.  
+Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq.  
+18205 Biscayne Boulevard  
+Suite 2218  
+Miami, FL 33160  
+305-931-2200  
+Fax: 305-931-0877  
+[ahorowitz@hermanlaw.com](mailto:ahorowitz@hermanlaw.com)  
+[iherman@hermanlaw.com](mailto:iherman@hermanlaw.com)  
+[lrivera@hermanlaw.com](mailto:lrivera@hermanlaw.com)  
+*Counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe #3*
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger  
+Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.  
+250 Australian Avenue South  
+Suite 1400  
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012  
+561-659-8300  
+Fax: 561-835-8691  
+[jagesq@bellsouth.net](mailto:jagesq@bellsouth.net)  
+*Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein*
+
+Michael R. Tein, Esq.  
+[REDACTED] Tein, P.L.  
+3059 Grand Avenue, Suite 340  
+Coconut Grove, FL 33133  
+305-442-1101  
+Fax: 305 442 6744  
+*Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein*  
+[tein@lewistein.com](mailto:tein@lewistein.com)
+
+![]()![]()MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ.  
+Florida Bar #617296  
+mpike@bclclaw.com
+
+BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN  
+515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400  
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401  
+561/842-2820 Phone  
+561/515-3148 Fax  
+(Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein)
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739423/EFTA02739423.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739423/EFTA02739423.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6eb39daba6f7a0c84af73750a118540291fa0fa2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739423/EFTA02739423.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,645 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739423.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 10,
+  "chars": 17339,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 7.29,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            199.3099822998047,
+            70.2974853515625
+          ],
+          [
+            406.36800000000005,
+            70.2974853515625
+          ],
+          [
+            406.36800000000005,
+            98.77996826171875
+          ],
+          [
+            199.3099822998047,
+            98.77996826171875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "DEFENDANT'S. EPSTEIN. MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION FOR MORE \nDEFINITE STATEMENT DIRECTED TO PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            102.88999938964844,
+            276.21000000000004
+          ],
+          [
+            501.84000000000003,
+            276.21000000000004
+          ],
+          [
+            501.84000000000003,
+            303.90997314453125
+          ],
+          [
+            102.88999938964844,
+            303.90997314453125
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Introduction",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            267.44399999999996,
+            426.16748046875
+          ],
+          [
+            336.2185363769531,
+            426.16748046875
+          ],
+          [
+            336.2185363769531,
+            440.77996826171875
+          ],
+          [
+            267.44399999999996,
+            440.77996826171875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Motion",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            284.0799865722656,
+            69.177490234375
+          ],
+          [
+            324.97200000000004,
+            69.177490234375
+          ],
+          [
+            324.97200000000004,
+            83.78997802734375
+          ],
+          [
+            284.0799865722656,
+            83.78997802734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Supporting Memorandum of Law \nStandard on Rule 12(b)(6) Motion To Dismiss",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            184.212,
+            564.9375
+          ],
+          [
+            423.6051330566406,
+            564.9375
+          ],
+          [
+            423.6051330566406,
+            592.2899932861328
+          ],
+          [
+            184.212,
+            592.2899932861328
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Count I \u2014 \"Sexual Assault and Battery\" is subiect to dismissal as Plaintiff has \nfailed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            96.084,
+            289.98
+          ],
+          [
+            511.63199999999995,
+            289.98
+          ],
+          [
+            511.63199999999995,
+            318.53997802734375
+          ],
+          [
+            96.084,
+            318.53997802734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CHAPTER 117-TRANSPORTATION FOR ILLEGAL SEXUAL ACTIVITY \nAND RELATED CRIMES",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            96.93000030517578,
+            69.66
+          ],
+          [
+            512.856,
+            69.66
+          ],
+          [
+            512.856,
+            98.77996826171875
+          ],
+          [
+            96.93000030517578,
+            98.77996826171875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "\u00a7 2422. Coercion and enticement",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            96.52999877929688,
+            99.63
+          ],
+          [
+            289.476,
+            99.63
+          ],
+          [
+            289.476,
+            114.90997314453125
+          ],
+          [
+            96.52999877929688,
+            114.90997314453125
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CHAPTER 110-SEXUAL EXPLOITATION AND OTHER ABUSE OF \nCHILDREN",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            96.54999542236328,
+            336.15
+          ],
+          [
+            511.63199999999995,
+            336.15
+          ],
+          [
+            511.63199999999995,
+            365.77996826171875
+          ],
+          [
+            96.54999542236328,
+            365.77996826171875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "\u00a7 2255. Civil remedy for personal injuries",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            96.52999877929688,
+            366.12
+          ],
+          [
+            334.15200000000004,
+            366.12
+          ],
+          [
+            334.15200000000004,
+            382.27996826171875
+          ],
+          [
+            96.52999877929688,
+            382.27996826171875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Conclusion",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            271.728,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            335.98800000000006,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            335.98800000000006,
+            84.24
+          ],
+          [
+            271.728,
+            84.24
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Certificate of Service",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            241.12800000000001,
+            260.82
+          ],
+          [
+            364.75199999999995,
+            260.82
+          ],
+          [
+            364.75199999999995,
+            276.21000000000004
+          ],
+          [
+            241.12800000000001,
+            276.21000000000004
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            55
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            57
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            83
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            34
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            79
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            31
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            67
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            57
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            79
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            38
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            11
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 9,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            22
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739423"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739433/EFTA02739433.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739433/EFTA02739433.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..47c358699a998083ef37f41239181c156ba1a04d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739433/EFTA02739433.md
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+/
+
+JANE DOE NO. 4, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MAR
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 5, CASE NO.: 08-CV-8038I-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+ORDER
+
+Upon Plaintiffs' Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Defendant's Motions to Dismiss and for More Definite Statement, and good cause being shown it is hereby
+
+ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion is granted. Plaintiffs shall have an enlargement of time of five (5) days, until October 31, 2008, to respond to Defendant's Motions to Dismiss.
+
+DONE AND ORDERED in in Ft. Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida, this day of 2008.
+
+DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739433/EFTA02739433.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739433/EFTA02739433.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f676db4b321f6be2751b360b83f0c55de49d929b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739433/EFTA02739433.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,120 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739433.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 2,
+  "chars": 882,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.11,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            405.95098876953125,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            405.95098876953125,
+            115.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            115.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            22
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            17
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            9
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739433"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739435/EFTA02739435.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739435/EFTA02739435.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..aca9abc88531990ac1c71584170f27f44f667aac
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739435/EFTA02739435.md
@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA I
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 4, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRA,
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 5, CASE NO.: 08-CV-8038I-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant. r
+
+> PLAINTIFFS' UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT
+
+Plaintiffs, Jane Doe 2, Jane Doe 3, Jane Doe 4 and Jane Doe 5, by and through undersigned counsel, file this Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Defendant's Motions to Dismiss and for More Definite Statement, and state as follows:
+
+1. Defendant Jeffrey Epstein filed a similar Motion to Dismiss and Motion for More Definite Statement (the "Motions to Dismiss") in each of the above-captioned cases, on October 6, 2008. Plaintiffs' response to the Motions to Dismiss under Local Rule 7.1 is presently due on October 24, 2008.
+
+2. Plaintiffs seek an enlargement of time of five (5) business days, until October 31, 2008, to file their response to the Motions to Dismiss. This enlargement of time will synchronize the response date to the Motions to Dismiss in the above-captioned cases with the response date to the similar Motions to Dismiss filed in Jane Doe Nos. 6-7 v. Epstein, case nos. 08-80994-CI V-Marra and 08- 80993-CIV-Marra, which is October 31, 2008.
+
+3. Additionally, this request for enlargement of time is necessitated by Plaintiffs' counsel's prior commitments and the demands of other cases and matters, including upcoming discovery cutoffs in Jane Doe v. School Board of Broward County and Scavella case no. 07-21367- CIV-SEITZ, U.S. District Court, Southern District Court of Florida, and Doe v. Faerber, case no. 05-CV-142-FTM-33DNF, U.S. District Court Middle District of Florida.
+
+4. This Motion seeks a brief enlargement of time and is not brought for purposes of delay.
+
+5. Plaintiff has conferred with Defendant's counsel, Robert Critton, regarding this request for enlargement of time. and he has no objection to this request.
+
+WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests an Order granting an enlargement of time of five (5) business days, until October 31, 2008, to file the Plaintiffs' response to the Motions to Dismiss.
+
+Dated: October 24, 2008. Respectfully submitted,
+
+By: a Jeffrey M. Herman Jeffrey M. Herman (FL Bar No. 521647) jherman@hermanlaw.com Stuart S. Mermelstein (FL Bar No. 947245) ssm@hermanlaw.com Adam D. Horowitz (FL. Bar No. 376980) ahorowitz@hermanlaw.com HERMAN & MERMELSTEIN, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiffs Jane Doe 18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160 Tel: 305-931-2200 Fax: 305-931-0877
+
+## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
+
+I hereby certify that on October 24, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day to all parties on the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those parties who are not authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing.
+
+s/ Jeffrey M. Herman
+
+## SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. jgoldberger@agwpa.com
+
+Michael R. Tein, Esq. tein@lewistein.com
+
+Robert D. Critton, Esq. rcritton@bcIclaw.com
+
+Michael Pike, Esq. mpike@bciclaw.com
+
+s/ Jeffrey M. Herman
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739435/EFTA02739435.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739435/EFTA02739435.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e06dc23a0b1d48ef3b49e65a824362f079a45ed2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739435/EFTA02739435.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,242 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739435.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 4,
+  "chars": 3652,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.21,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            405.95098876953125,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            405.95098876953125,
+            100.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            100.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            227.052,
+            362.07
+          ],
+          [
+            385.0019836425781,
+            362.07
+          ],
+          [
+            385.0019836425781,
+            377.2330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            227.052,
+            377.2330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "SERVICE LIST \nDOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN \nUnited States District Court, Southern District of Florida",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            156.67200000000003,
+            70.47
+          ],
+          [
+            455.6502685546875,
+            70.47
+          ],
+          [
+            455.6502685546875,
+            114.43353271484375
+          ],
+          [
+            156.67200000000003,
+            114.43353271484375
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            57
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            21
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            52
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            24
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            47
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            23
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            14
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739435"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739439/EFTA02739439.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739439/EFTA02739439.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1c89aa4ada835418ec9959105c1e5b9d908c72a4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739439/EFTA02739439.md
@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 2,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRAIMI
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRAMMI
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 4, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRAIMI
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 5, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80381-MARRAMMI
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+/
+
+Upon Plaintiffs' Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Defendant's Motions to Dismiss and for More Definite Statement, and good cause being shown it is hereby
+
+ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion is granted. Plaintiffs shall have an enlargement of time of five (5) days, until October 31, 2008, to respond to Defendant's Motions to Dismiss.
+
+DONE AND ORDERED in NM, in Ft. Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida, this day of f) .--ata.\_ , 2008.
+
+DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739439/EFTA02739439.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739439/EFTA02739439.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1dedab523605608b882cdea7f9249b16518fce7c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739439/EFTA02739439.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,143 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739439.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 2,
+  "chars": 913,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.46,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            201.72000000000003,
+            85.05
+          ],
+          [
+            401.5509338378906,
+            85.05
+          ],
+          [
+            401.5509338378906,
+            115.01999999999998
+          ],
+          [
+            201.72000000000003,
+            115.01999999999998
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "ORDER",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            282.9,
+            704.7
+          ],
+          [
+            333.2853698730469,
+            704.7
+          ],
+          [
+            333.2853698730469,
+            718.47
+          ],
+          [
+            282.9,
+            718.47
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            98
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            105
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            9
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739439"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739441/EFTA02739441.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739441/EFTA02739441.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e6eeed2d3a21adc89610af426faea40b943c08b7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739441/EFTA02739441.md
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
+![](_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg)
+
+## U.S. Department of Justice
+
+United States Attorney Southern District of Florida
+
+500 South Australian Ave., Suite 400 West Paint Beach, FL 33401 (561)820-8711 Facsimile: (561) 820-8777
+
+July 10, 2008
+
+## VIA FACSIMILE AND U.S. MAIL
+
+Jeffrey Herman, Esq. Herman & Mermelstein, P.A. 18205 Biscayne Boulevard Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160
+
+> Re: Jeffrey E NOTIFICATION OF IDENTIFIED VICTIM
+
+Dear Mr. Herman:
+
+By virtue of this letter, the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida asks that you provide the following notice to your client,
+
+On June 30, 2008, Jeffrey Epstein (hereinafter referred to as "Epstein) entered <sup>a</sup>plea of guilty to violations of Florida Statutes Sections 796.07 (felony solicitation of prostitution) and 796.03 (procurement of minors to engage in prostitution), in the 15th Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County (Case Nos. 2006-cf-009454MODCMB and 2008-cf-009381A3OONB) and was sentenced to a term of twelve months' imprisonment to be followed by an additional six months' imprisonment, followed by twelve months of Community Control 1, with conditions of community confinement imposed by the Court.
+
+In light of the entry of the guilty plea and sentence, the United States has agreed to defer federal prosecution in favor of this state plea and sentence, subject to certain conditions.
+
+One such condition to which Epstein has agreed is the following:
+
+"Any person, who while a minor, was avictim of aviolation of an offense enumerated in Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, will have the same JEFFREY HERMAN, ESQ.
+
+NOTIFICATION OF IDENTIFIED VICTIM
+
+JULY 10, 2008
+
+PAGE 2 OF 2
+
+rights to proceed under Section 2255 as she would have had, if Mr. Epstein had been tried federally and convicted of an enumerated offense. For purposes of implementing this paragraph, the United States shall provide Mr. Epstein's attorneys with a list of individuals whom it was prepared to name in an Indictment as victims of an enumerated offense by Mr. Epstein. Any judicial authority interpreting this provision, including any authority determining which evidentiary burdens if any <sup>a</sup>plaintiff must meet, shall consider that it is the intent of the parties to place these identified victims in the same position as they would have been had Mr. Epstein been convicted at trial. No more; no less."
+
+Through this letter, this Office hereby provides Notice that your client, MOM NMI is an individual whom the United States was prepared to name as avictim of an enumerated offense.
+
+Should your client decide to file aclaim against Jeffrey Epstein, his attorney, Jack Goldberger, asks that you contact him at Atterbury Goldberger and Weiss, 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401.
+
+Please understand that neither the U.S. Attorney's Office nor the Federal Bureau of Investigation can take part in or otherwise assist in civil litigation; however, if you do file <sup>a</sup> claim under 18 U.S.C. § 2255 and Mr. Epstein denies that your client is avictim of an enumerated offense, please provide written documentation of that denial to the undersigned.
+
+Please thank your client for all of her assistance during the course of this investigation and express the heartfelt regards of myself and Special Agents Kuyrkendall and Richards for the health and well-being of fl
+
+> R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
+
+By:
+
+cc: Jack Goldberger, Esq.
+
+A. VELLAFAI-(1A ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739441/EFTA02739441.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739441/EFTA02739441.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6b1955f56b2a2be4a652d157d7fe7c0668e48aa4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739441/EFTA02739441.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,149 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739441.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 2,
+  "chars": 3515,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 0.92,
+  "image_assets": [
+    "_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg"
+  ],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "U.S. Department of Justice",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            169.80100000000002,
+            55.148
+          ],
+          [
+            317.208740234375,
+            55.148
+          ],
+          [
+            317.208740234375,
+            70.86419677734375
+          ],
+          [
+            169.80100000000002,
+            70.86419677734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "VIA FACSIMILE AND U.S. MAIL",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            72.33399999999999,
+            240.05599999999998
+          ],
+          [
+            272.20263671875,
+            240.05599999999998
+          ],
+          [
+            272.20263671875,
+            255.29766845703125
+          ],
+          [
+            72.33399999999999,
+            255.29766845703125
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            296
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            34
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            11
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Picture",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            362
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            35
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            13
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739441"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739441/_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739441/_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..93047d09ceed9bf0b70536adbfccb404b0bdb47e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739441/_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:5f49d4fcc2a0b345e900d0e88fad6bb03d2b7306d2250268fc7093c0ede53da8
+size 11795
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739443/EFTA02739443.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739443/EFTA02739443.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ec7ea9a3f7b68444e897b97a9dd1505bf67cd362
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739443/EFTA02739443.md
@@ -0,0 +1,135 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA I
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 4, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRA,
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 5, CASE NO.: 08-CV-8038I-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 6, CASE NO.: 08- 80994-CIV-MARR NEM
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 7, CASE NO.: 08- 80993-CIV-MARRa
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+# PLAINTIFFS' MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO MOTIONS TO DISMISS
+
+Plaintiffs, Jane Does 2-7, by and through undersigned counsel, file this Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Motions to Dismiss, pursuant to S.D.Fla.L.R. 7.1(C), as follows:
+
+#### I. Introduction and Sununars
+
+Defendant's Motions to Dismiss and for More Definite Statement filed in each of the abovecaptioned cases pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(6)(6) and 12(e) essentially concede that Plaintiffs have alleged the elements of the claims asserted in Counts I and III of each pleading, but contend that more factual allegations are necessary for these claims. The pleadings at issue contain a short and plain statement of the claims showing that the Plaintiffs are entitled to relief in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a)(2). The specific facts sought by Defendant may properly be the subject of discovery, but are not necessary for purposes of pleading. Accordingly, Defendant's Motions are without merit and should be denied in their entirety.
+
+#### II. Facts Plead
+
+The pleadings in these six cases are all similarly structured and assert the same claims. In the section entitled "Factual Allegations" each describes the plan and scheme of Defendant Epstein to recruit underage girls to his Palm Beach mansion for "massages". (Jane Doe No. 2 Amd.Compl.11 10-11; Jane Doe No. 3 Amd. Comp. 1 10-11; Jane Doe No. 4 Amd. Comp!. 111-12; Jane Doe No. 5 Amd. Comp1.1 10-1 1; Jane Doe No. 6 Amd. Compl.111-12; Jane Doe No. 7 Amd. Comp1.1 11-12). The pleading then alleges that, consistent with this scheme, the Plaintiff was lured to Epstein's Palm Beach mansion to give a massage for monetary compensation. (Jane Doe No. 2 Amd. Compl. 1 12; (Jane Doe No. 3 Amd. Compl. 1 12; Jane Doe No. 4 Amd. Compl. 1 13; Jane Doe No. 5 Amd. Compl. 1 12; Jane Doe No. 6 Amd. Compl .1 13; Jane Doe No. 7 Amd. Compl. 1 13). The Plaintiff was directed up a flight of stairs to a room where Epstein instructed the Plaintiff to remove her clothes and give him a massage. Epstein then masturbated and sexually assaulted the Plaintiff during this massage. (Jane Doe No. 2 Amd. Compl. 112; Jane Doe No. 3 Amd. Compl. 112; Jane Doe No. 4 Amd. Comp!. 113; Jane Doe No. 5 Amd. Compl. 112; Jane Doe No. 6 Amd. Compl. 113; Jane Doe No. 7 Amd. Compl. 113).
+
+Count I of the pleading in each case alleges a claim of sexual assault and battery. Count II alleges a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress, which Defendant does not seek to dismiss in his Motions before the Court. Count HI alleges a claim for coercion and enticement to sexual activity in violation of 18 U.S.C. §2422. Defendant's Motions to Dismiss seek dismissal of Counts I and III for failure to state a claim under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(bX6), or alternatively move for a more definite statement under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(e) on these Counts. As discussed below, Plaintiffs' claims are sufficiently plead, and Defendant's Motions should be denied in their entirety.
+
+### III. Argument
+
+### A. THE STANDARD UNDER FED.R.CIV.P. 12(b)(6) DOES NOT SUPPORT DISMISSAL
+
+The gravamen of Defendant's Motion is that Plaintiffs' have not pled sufficient facts in support of their claims in Counts I and III. According to Defendant, the pleadings in this case do not satisfy "the standard of pleading" established in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly 127 S.Ct. 1955 (2007). In making this argument, Defendant would extend Twombly well beyond its intended scope.
+
+Twombly was an antitrust conspiracy case, in which the Court abrogated the longstanding pronouncement first made in Con 355 U.S. 41 (1957), that a complaint should not be dismissed under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(bX6) "unless it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim that would entitle him to relief." 127 S.Ct. at 1969. The Court noted that it did "not require heightened fact pleading of specifics, but only enough facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face." Id. at 1974 (emphasis supplied). The antitrust conspiracy claim before the Court was dismissed 114i:cause the plaintiffs here have not nudged their claims across the line from conceivable to plausible...." Id.
+
+Since Twombly, courts and commentators have grappled with the case's meaning and scope. Courts within the Eleventh Circuit have held that Twomblv did not alter the standard for dismissal under Rule 12(bX6) in the typical case. See, e.g.,CBT Flint Partners, LLC v. Goodmail Systems, Inc 529 F.Supp. 2d 1376, 1379 (N.D. Ga. 2007); Coughlin v. Wal-Mart Stores East LP 2008 WL 2704381 (M.D. Fla. 2008); Capaz v. Whitaker, Weinstraub & Grizzard, M.D.S, P.A., 2007 WL 1655473 (M.D. Fla. 2007). In CBT Flint Partners the Court warned against reading the decision in Trombly too broadly:
+
+In my view, Trombly did not radically alter the elementary rules of civil procedure that have governed litigation in the federal courts for the seventy years. The Court's forced retirement of Conley v. "no set of facts" language does not change the fundamental command of Rule 8 as to what a valid complaint must look like. Indeed, the Court made clear that it was not imposing a heightened pleading standard. As a general matter, I am loath to assume that the Supreme Court circumvented the normal channels for amending the Federal Rules. The Court's "new standard" was merely a specific way to articulate a solution to what it perceived to be a specific pleading problem, in a specific area of law that inflicted a high cost upon antitrust defendants. It was not a broad based new license for federal courts to ramp up pleading requirements.
+
+529 F.Supp. 2d at 1379 (citations omitted).
+
+The standard for pleading in the federal courts remains controlled by Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a)(2), which "only requires a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief in order to give the defendant fair notice of what the claim is and the grounds upon which it rests." Capaz, 2007 WL 1655473 at \*1. While the scope of Twombly may not be entirely clear, it plainly cannot be read to turn pleadings into a discovery device, as Defendant advocates here in seeking dismissal for failure to plead detailed factual allegations.
+
+In Iqbal v. Hasty 490 F.3d 143 (2d Cir. 2007), the Court reviewed and analyzed in depth Twombly's "conflicting signals", and ultimately held that the Supreme Court did not impose "a universal standard of heightened fact pleading," but rather a "flexible 'plausibility standard' ". Id. at 157-158. This standard "obliges a pleader to amplify a claim with some factual allegations in those contexts where such amplification is needed to render the claim plausible." Id. (emphasis original). See also Sales v. All Florida Dialysis Services, Inc., 2007 WL 3231723 \*2 n.2 (S.D. Fla. 2007) (noting that Twomblv was inapplicable because the defendants did not raise the type of pleading deficiencies confronted in Twombly - lack of specific time, place or person involved in the alleged antitrust conspiracies).
+
+The instant allegations and claims cannot be compared to the speculative antitrust conspiracy alleged in Twombly. See 127 S.Ct. at 1965. There should be no doubt that the Plaintiffs' claims are plausible. Accordingly Twombley is not authority for dismissal of the pleadings in these cases.
+
+# II. THE ELEMENTS OF COUNT I FOR SEXUAL ASSAULT AND BATTERY ARE SUFFICIENTLY ALLEGED
+
+In each case, the claim in Count I is labeled "Sexual Assault and Battery." Assault and battery are closely related common law intentional torts that are often alleged together. See Herzfeld v. Herzfeld 781 So.2d 1070 (F1a.2001) (noting that plaintiff alleged intentional ton of "assault and battery" based on allegations of sexual abuse); v. Atlantic Federal Savings & Loan, 454 So.2d 52 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984) (holding that a cause of action for assault and battery cannot be based entirely on an omission). A common law assault occurs when a person "acts intending to cause a harmful or offensive contact with the person of the other, or an imminent apprehension of such contact, and the other is thereby put in such imminent apprehension". Restatement (Second) of Tons, Assault §21 (1965). "A battery consists of the infliction of a harmful or offensive contact upon another with the intent to cause such contact or the apprehension that such contact is imminent". See Paul v. Holbrook, 696 So.2d 1371 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997). See also Scelta v. Delicatessen Support Services. Inc. 57 F.Supp. 2d 1327, 1358-59 (M.D. Ha. 1999) (allegation that defendant attempted to put his hands down plaintiff's dress, and that there was an actual and intentional touching, sufficient to state a claim for battery); Hogan v. Tavzel 660 So.2d 350 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) (tortfeasor may be liable for battery for infecting another with a sexually transmitted disease).
+
+Defendant does not contend that the Plaintiffs failed to allege these elements of the common law tons of assault and battery in Count I of their pleadings. Rather, Defendant argues that the pleadings fail to allege the specific facts of "what was said or done to Plaintiff'. Defendant thus misconstrues Twombly. All of the Plaintiffs allege essentially the same plan and scheme of Defendant to lure underage girls to his Palm Beach mansion for "massages", leading to Defendant engaging in sexual activities with the Plaintiffs. The specific facts concerning what was said and done prior to and during the course of these "massages" is the proper subject of discovery, not the pleadings. Plaintiffs satisfy the pleading requirements of Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a)(2), and Twombly does not require more specific fact pleading in these cases.
+
+# III. PLAINTIFFS SUFFICIENTLY ALLEGE A CLAIM IN COUNT III FOR VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. 42422
+
+The pleadings in Count III closely track the language of 18 U.S.C. §2422, and thus set forth the elements of a violation of this Statute, as follows:
+
+(i) Allegation in Complaint. Epstein used a facility or means of interstate commerce to knowingly persuade, induce or entice Jane Doe, when she was under the age of 18 years, to engage in prostitution or sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense; and
+
+(ii) 18 U.S.C. §2422(b). Whoever, using the mail or any facility or means of interstate or foreign commerce, ... knowingly persuades, induces, entices, or coerces any individual who has not attained the age of 18 years, to engage in prostitution or any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense, or attempts to do so...
+
+18 U.S.C. §2455(b); Jane Doe 2 Amd. Compl. 1 29; Jane Doe 3 Amd. Comp1.1 29; Jane Doe 4 Amd. Comp1.1 30; Jane Doe 5 Amd. Compl.1 29; Jane Doe 6 Amd. Compl. 1 28; Jane Doe 7 Amd. Compl. 1 29. Defendant does not appear to contend that Plaintiffs have failed to allege the elements of a violation of 18 U.S.C. §2422 in Count III, but instead argues that further factual allegations are necessary. As with Count I, such specific facts are the proper subject of discovery, and need not be set forth in the pleadings under Rule 8(aX2). There is no issue of plausibility concerning the Plaintiffs' claims under 18 U.S.C. §2422. Indeed, the Plaintiffs in these cases were notified by the U.S. Attorney's office that the Defendant has agreed that each Plaintiff has the same right to proceed on her federal statutory claim "as she would have had if Mr. Epstein had been tried federally and convicted of an enumerated offense." ( \$ite July 10, 2008 letter from A. Villafana, Assistant U.S. Attorney, attached hereto as Exhibit "A").
+
+Defendant also attempts to make much of a typographical error that appears in Count III in the "Wherefore" clause demanding a judgment for damages. There, the pleading inadvertently makes reference to 28 U.S.C. §2255(a) instead of 18 U.S.C. §2255(a). As is clear from the Defendants' Motions, Defendant is well aware that this is a typographical error and that the intent is to reference 18 U.S.C. §2255. In any event, this reference concerns the Plaintiffs' damages, not the elements of Plaintiff's claim set forth in the paragraphs above it.' Count III nonetheless satisfies Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a)(3), as the "Wherefore" clause states that Plaintiff seeks actual and compensatory damages, costs of suit, attorneys' fees and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper. If deemed necessary, the typographical error in the "Wherefore" clause of Count III can be corrected by interlineation. It does not warrant a dismissal and repleading.
+
+# IV. THERE IS NO BASIS FOR DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT
+
+A motion for more definite statement under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(e) may only be granted "if a pleading is so vague or ambiguous that a party cannot reasonably be required to frame a responsive pleading." v. Two Brothers Farm. LLC, 2008 WL 4405409 \*1 (S.D. Ha. 2008) (quoting Betancourt v. Marine Cargo Mgmt., 930 F. Supp. 606, 608 (S.D. Fla. 1996)). Federal courts disfavor motions for more definite statement. Home Mgmt. Solutions. Inc. v. Prescient. Inc. 2007 WL 2412834 (S.D. Ha. 2007). Most importantly, "Defendants may not use a motion for more definite statement as a means of discovery regarding those claims." 2008 WL 4405409 at \*1. Yet that is exactly how Defendant Epstein uses his Motions for More Definite Statement. He
+
+<sup>&#</sup>x27; As a result, this reference in error to 28 U.S.C. 2255(a) is not set forth in a paragraph to which Defendant would be expected to frame an answer.
+
+seeks by these Motions specific facts which are the proper subject of discovery, not pleadings. Accordingly, Defendants Motions for More Definite Statement should be denied.
+
+# V. Conclusion
+
+For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs respectfully request that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss be denied in their entirety.
+
+Dated: October 31, 2008. Respectfully submitted,
+
+By: s/ Jeffrey M. Herman Jeffrey M. Herman (FL Bar No. 521647) iherman@hermanlaw.com Stuart S. Mermelstein (FL Bar No. 947245) ssm@herrnanlaw.com Adam D. Horowitz (FL Bar No. 376980) ahorowitz@hermanlaw.com HERMAN & MERMELSTE1N, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiffs Jane Doe 18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160 Tel: 305-931-2200 Fax: 305-931-0877
+
+#### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
+
+I hereby certify that on October 31, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day to all parties on the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those parties who are not authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing.
+
+s/ Jeffrey M. Herman
+
+#### SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. jgoldberger@agwpa.com
+
+Michael R. Tein, Esq. tein@lewistein.com
+
+Robert D. Critton, Esq. rcritton@bciclaw.com
+
+Michael Pike, Esq. mpike@bciclaw.com
+
+s/ Jeffrey M. Herman
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739443/EFTA02739443.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739443/EFTA02739443.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d01fb522dceea6926b8c3004216d7b208e1a71c3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739443/EFTA02739443.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,719 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739443.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 11,
+  "chars": 15682,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.71,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            405.95098876953125,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            405.95098876953125,
+            100.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            100.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "PLAINTIFFS' MEMORANDUM OF LAW \nIN OPPOSITION TO MOTIONS TO DISMISS",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            179.928,
+            379.08000000000004
+          ],
+          [
+            432.22998046875,
+            379.08000000000004
+          ],
+          [
+            432.22998046875,
+            408.7330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            179.928,
+            408.7330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "I. Introduction and Sununars",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            214.2,
+            477.9
+          ],
+          [
+            396.0953674316406,
+            477.9
+          ],
+          [
+            396.0953674316406,
+            491.60302734375
+          ],
+          [
+            214.2,
+            491.60302734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "II. Facts Plead",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            255.204,
+            100.44
+          ],
+          [
+            356.1445007324219,
+            100.44
+          ],
+          [
+            356.1445007324219,
+            114.363037109375
+          ],
+          [
+            255.204,
+            114.363037109375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "III. Argument",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            258.876,
+            100.44
+          ],
+          [
+            353.11187744140625,
+            100.44
+          ],
+          [
+            353.11187744140625,
+            114.7330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            258.876,
+            114.7330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "A. THE STANDARD UNDER FED.R.CIV.P. 12(b)(6) \nDOES NOT SUPPORT DISMISSAL",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            154.836,
+            127.98000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            457.8358154296875,
+            127.98000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            457.8358154296875,
+            156.7330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            154.836,
+            156.7330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "II. THE ELEMENTS OF COUNT I FOR SEXUAL ASSAULT \nAND BATTERY ARE SUFFICIENTLY ALLEGED",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            130.968,
+            154.71
+          ],
+          [
+            481.0647888183594,
+            154.71
+          ],
+          [
+            481.0647888183594,
+            184.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            130.968,
+            184.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "III. PLAINTIFFS SUFFICIENTLY ALLEGE A CLAIM \nIN COUNT III FOR VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C. 42422",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            148.71599999999998,
+            238.95
+          ],
+          [
+            468.0710144042969,
+            238.95
+          ],
+          [
+            468.0710144042969,
+            268.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            148.71599999999998,
+            268.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "IV. THERE IS NO BASIS FOR DEFENDANT'S \nMOTION FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            168.912,
+            406.62
+          ],
+          [
+            456.38507080078125,
+            406.62
+          ],
+          [
+            456.38507080078125,
+            436.10302734375
+          ],
+          [
+            168.912,
+            436.10302734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "V. Conclusion",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            255.81599999999997,
+            126.35999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            355.7822570800781,
+            126.35999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            355.7822570800781,
+            142.863037109375
+          ],
+          [
+            255.81599999999997,
+            142.863037109375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 9,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            227.66400000000002,
+            72.08999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            385.02947998046875,
+            72.08999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            385.02947998046875,
+            85.863037109375
+          ],
+          [
+            227.66400000000002,
+            85.863037109375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "SERVICE LIST \nDOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN \nUnited States District Court, Southern District of Florida",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 10,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            156.06,
+            72.08999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            455.1346740722656,
+            72.08999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            455.1346740722656,
+            114.7330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            156.06,
+            114.7330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            49
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            24
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            20
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            49
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            73
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            87
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            32
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            67
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            68
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            30
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            57
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            43
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            22
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 9,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            20
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 10,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            29
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            15
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739443"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739454/EFTA02739454.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739454/EFTA02739454.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8c69aca83cea4e8227648b93196ccc43bd3e7bd3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739454/EFTA02739454.md
@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+v.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S REPLY TO PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS & FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT
+
+Defendant, JEFFERY EPSTEIN, (EPSTEIN), by and through his undersigned attorneys, files his reply to Plaintiffs' Memorandum Of Law In Opposition To Motions To Dismiss, dated October 31, 2008, and states:
+
+Although Plaintiffs, Jane Doe Nos. 2 through 7, are separate and distinct persons, in separate and distinct actions, with separate and distinct facts and circumstances pertaining to the claims each is attempting to allege, Plaintiffs' counsel has filed a broad brush, identical response to Defendant's motions to dismiss and for more definite statement which were filed in each of the actions. As pointed out in Defendant's previously filed motions, there are factual distinctions in the actions and the allegations in Plaintiffs' attempts to assert the claims labeled as Count I — "Sexual Assault and Battery," and Count III - "Coercion and Enticement to Sexual Activity In Violation of 18 U.S.C. §2422." It is essential that each of the actions and the respective complaints filed therein are examined and treated as separate and distinct actions in deciding the respective legal issues and positions asserted.
+
+Jane Doe No. 3 v. Epstein Page 2
+
+As noted, Defendant's motion is directed to Count I and III of the respective complaints. Contrary to each Plaintiffs assertion, Defendant does not concede that Plaintiff has sufficiently plead the elements required to assert claims in Count I for "Sexual Assault and Battery" and in Count III pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§2422, and Defendant has not "misconstrued" the pleading standard formulated by the United States Supreme Court in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twomblv, 127 S.Ct. 1955 (2007). In discussing Twomblv, the Eleventh Circuit in v. Fla. International Univ., 495 F.3d 1289, 1295 (11th Cir. 2007), noted - "The Supreme Court's most recent formulation of the pleading specificity standard is that 'stating such a claim requires a complaint with enough factual matter (taken as true) to suggest' the required element." In order to sufficiently allege the claim, the complaint is required to identify "facts that are suggestive enough to render [the element] plausible." 495 F.3d at 1296 (quoting Twombly , 127 S.Ct. at 1965). As stated in Defendant's motion to dismiss, Plaintiff has not met this standard requiring the pleading of facts to suggest the elements of the claims she is attempting to assert. In other words, Plaintiff is required to plead facts that suggest each element of the claim she is attempting to assert, as opposed to a generalized pleading. Accordingly, Defendant relies on the legal positions and argument in his motion, rather than reargue what has already been stated.
+
+Finally, the letter attached as an Exhibit to Plaintiffs response is not dispositive of the issue of whether the Plaintiff has sufficiently alleged a claim in Count III pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §2422.
+
+Jane Doe No. 3 v. Epstein  
+Page 3
+
+Wherefore, Defendant requests that this Court grant his motion to dismiss and for more definite statement directed to Plaintiff's Complaint.
+
+**Certificate of Service**
+
+I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record identified on the following Service List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on this 11 day of November, 2008:
+
+Adam D. Horowitz, Esq.  
+Jeffrey Marc Herman, Esq.  
+Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq.  
+18205 Biscayne Boulevard  
+Suite 2218  
+Miami, FL 33160  
+305-931-2200  
+Fax: 305-931-0877  
+[ahorowitz@hermanlaw.com](mailto:ahorowitz@hermanlaw.com)  
+[iherman@hermanlaw.com](mailto:iherman@hermanlaw.com)  
+[lrivera@hermanlaw.com](mailto:lrivera@hermanlaw.com)  
+Counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe #3
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger  
+Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.  
+250 Australian Avenue South  
+Suite 1400  
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012  
+561-659-8300  
+Fax: 561-835-8691  
+[iagesq@bellsouth.net](mailto:iagesq@bellsouth.net)  
+Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
+
+Michael R. Tein, Esq.  
+[REDACTED] Tein, P.L.  
+3059 Grand Avenue, Suite 340  
+Coconut Grove, FL 33133  
+305-442-1101  
+Fax: 305 442 6744  
+Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein  
+[tein@lewistein.com](mailto:tein@lewistein.com)
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+By:
+
+![]()ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ.
+
+Florida Bar No. 224162
+
+[rcrit@bclclaw.com](mailto:rcrit@bclclaw.com)
+
+MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ.
+
+Florida Bar #617296
+
+[mpike@bclclaw.com](mailto:mpike@bclclaw.com)
+
+BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN
+
+515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400
+
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+
+561/842-2820 Phone
+
+561/515-3148 Fax
+
+(Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein)
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739454/EFTA02739454.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739454/EFTA02739454.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..00615c7cdf5af65737dadc6fae320f6a0a8fa88c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739454/EFTA02739454.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,196 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739454.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 3,
+  "chars": 4923,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 7.08,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            198.89999999999998,
+            86.67
+          ],
+          [
+            407.120849609375,
+            86.67
+          ],
+          [
+            407.120849609375,
+            115.56353759765625
+          ],
+          [
+            198.89999999999998,
+            115.56353759765625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S REPLY TO PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO \nDEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS & FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            106.48799999999999,
+            292.40999999999997
+          ],
+          [
+            500.4072570800781,
+            292.40999999999997
+          ],
+          [
+            500.4072570800781,
+            319.93353271484375
+          ],
+          [
+            106.48799999999999,
+            319.93353271484375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Certificate of Service",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            247.24800000000005,
+            162.0
+          ],
+          [
+            360.46799999999996,
+            162.0
+          ],
+          [
+            360.46799999999996,
+            174.96
+          ],
+          [
+            247.24800000000005,
+            174.96
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            61
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            29
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739454"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739457/EFTA02739457.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739457/EFTA02739457.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..28dff8ca99c6fb5e053831f51e7e2c8e4d2ea459
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739457/EFTA02739457.md
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-80232-UV-
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL AS CO-COUNSEL
+
+TEIN, PL notices its withdrawal as co-counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein in this matter.
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+TEIN, P.L. 3059 Grand Avenue, Suite 340 Coconut Grove, Florida 33133 Tel: 305 442 1101 Fax: 305 442 6744
+
+By: Id Michir
+
+GUY A. Fla. Bar No. 623740
+
+MICHAEL R. TEN Fla. Bar No. 993522 tein@lewistein.com
+
+![](_page_0_Picture_15.jpeg)
+
+## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
+
+I HEREBY CERTIFY that on December 30, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court by using the CM/ECF system. I further certify that plaintiff's attorneys are CM/ECF participants, as indicated by the CM/ECF Attorney Listings for this case.
+
+/s/ Michael R. Tein
+
+Michael R. Tein
+
+## Service List
+
+Jeffrey M. Herman, Esq. Stuart S. Mennelstein, Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Herman & Mermelstein, P.A. 18205 Biscayne Blvd, Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160
+
+Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. Atterbery, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
+
+Robert D. Critton, Esq. Michael J. Pike, Esq. Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, LLP 515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
+
+![](_page_1_Picture_11.jpeg)
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739457/EFTA02739457.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739457/EFTA02739457.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d25d2fb66b84f3d3350dfaa5440d8ce340080054
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739457/EFTA02739457.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,204 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739457.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 2,
+  "chars": 1358,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 0.96,
+  "image_assets": [
+    "_page_0_Picture_15.jpeg",
+    "_page_1_Picture_11.jpeg"
+  ],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            198.25000000000003,
+            69.66
+          ],
+          [
+            396.92919921875,
+            69.66
+          ],
+          [
+            396.92919921875,
+            100.0980224609375
+          ],
+          [
+            198.25000000000003,
+            100.0980224609375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL AS CO-COUNSEL",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            170.19000000000003,
+            318.33
+          ],
+          [
+            432.9930419921875,
+            318.33
+          ],
+          [
+            432.9930419921875,
+            334.0980224609375
+          ],
+          [
+            170.19000000000003,
+            334.0980224609375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            220.21,
+            73.71000000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            384.0411682128906,
+            73.71000000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            384.0411682128906,
+            88.60748291015625
+          ],
+          [
+            220.21,
+            88.60748291015625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Service List",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            267.79,
+            245.43
+          ],
+          [
+            332.737060546875,
+            245.43
+          ],
+          [
+            332.737060546875,
+            260.36749267578125
+          ],
+          [
+            267.79,
+            260.36749267578125
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            52
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Picture",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            57
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Picture",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739457"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739457/_page_0_Picture_15.jpeg b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739457/_page_0_Picture_15.jpeg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d30fe4f4c639e13485d2b798433340cfd33f1124
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739457/_page_0_Picture_15.jpeg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:409f2f427b4717f22127d44213ccedd4eba1f9bbf25db8e2ad0f30be26cc1a67
+size 2630
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739457/_page_1_Picture_11.jpeg b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739457/_page_1_Picture_11.jpeg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9dc00ffab51b5d05f99fc505b9812d3d8000c288
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739457/_page_1_Picture_11.jpeg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:fe71a2f2943a37590a796f22c7dde3bb2248c2764c2f1e4572e1a98f5bc9bc7a
+size 2409
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739459/EFTA02739459.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739459/EFTA02739459.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6a00e96477c3010927bef37d85715a9c9d7ea09d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739459/EFTA02739459.md
@@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
+#### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO. 08-80232-CIV-MARRA
+
+Jane Doe No. 3,
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+### OPINION AND ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT
+
+THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Defendant")'s Motion to Dismiss and Motion for More Definite Statement, Directed to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (DE 41), filed October 6, 2008. Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 3 ("Plaintiff") filed a response to the motion (DE 45) and Defendant filed a Reply (DE 46). The Court has carefully reviewed the motion, response, and reply, and is otherwise fully advised in the premises.
+
+## Background
+
+On March 5, 2008, Plaintiff filed her Complaint against Defendant (DE 1), which was replaced on September 22, 2008 by an Amended Complaint (DE 37). Plaintiff brings suit alleging Count I - Sexual Assault and Battery; Count II - Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress; and Count III - Coercion and Enticement to Sexual Activity in Violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2422.
+
+The facts, as alleged in the Amended Complaint, are as follows: At all relevant times, Defendant was an adult male. Am. Comp1.1 7. Defendant engaged in a plan and scheme in
+
+which he gained access to primarily economically disadvantaged minor girls in his home, sexually assaulted these girls, and then gave them money. Am. Comp!. ¶ 8. In or about 2004- 2005, Plaintiff, then approximately 16 years old, became one of Defendant's victims. Am. Compl. ¶ 8. Defendant carried out his scheme and assaulted girls in Florida, New York, and his private island in St. Am. Compl. ¶ 9.
+
+Defendant's scheme involved the use of, a Palm Beach Community College Student from Loxahatchee, Florida, to recruit underage girls. Am. Comp!. ¶ 10. Under Defendant's plan, underage girls were recruited ostensibly to give a wealthy man a massage for monetary compensation in his Palm Beach mansion. Id. would be contacted when Defendant was planning to be at his Palm Beach residence or soon after he arrived. Id. Defendant or someone on his behalf directed to bring one or more underage girls to the residence. Id. generally sought out economically disadvantaged underage girls from Loxahatchee and surrounding areas who would be enticed by the money being offered generally \$200 to \$300 per "massage" session — and who were perceived as less likely to complain to authorities or have credibility if allegations of improper conduct were made. Id. This was an important element of Epstein's plan. Id.
+
+Defendant's plan and scheme reflected a particular pattern and method. Am. Compl. ¶ 11. Upon arrival at Defendant's mansion, the underage victim would be brought to the kitchen. Id. She would then be led up a flight of stairs to a bedroom that contained a massage table in addition to other furnishings. Id. Once the girl was alone in the room, Defendant would enter wearing only a towel. M. Defendant would then lay down on the massage table and perform one or more lewd, lascivious and sexual acts, including masturbation and touching the girl sexually.
+
+Id.
+
+Consistent with the foregoing plan, recruited Plaintiff to give Defendant a massage for monetary compensation. Am. Comp!. ¶ 12. brought Plaintiff to Defendant's mansion in Palm Beach. Id. Plaintiff was led up a flight of stairs to the room with the massage table. Id. She was alone in the room when Defendant arrived wearing only a towel. Id. Defendant laid down on the massage table, and sexually assaulted Plaintiff during the massage. Id. In addition, Defendant masturbated during the massage. Id.
+
+After Defendant had completed the assault, Plaintiff was then able to leave the room and go back downstairs. Am. Comp1.1 13. She then met again, who brought her home. Id. Defendant paid Plaintiff \$200. Id. Defendant also paid for bringing Plaintiff to him. Id. As a result of this encounter, the 16-year-old Plaintiff experienced trauma, shock, confusion, shame, humiliation, and embarrassment. Am. Comp1.1 14.
+
+Under Count I - Sexual Assault and Battery, the Amended Complaint alleges as follows: Defendant acted with intent to cause an offensive contact with Plaintiff, or an imminent apprehension of such a contact, and Plaintiff was thereby put in such imminent apprehension. Am. Compl. ¶ 16. Defendant made an intentional, unlawful offer of offensive sexual contact toward Plaintiff, creating a reasonable fear of imminent peril. Am. Compl. ¶ 17. Defendant intentionally inflicted harmful or offensive contact on the person of Plaintiff, with the intent to cause such contact or the apprehension that such contact is imminent. Am. Compl. 1 18. Defendant tortiously committed a sexual assault and battery on Plaintiff. Am. Comp!. ¶ 19. Defendant's acts were intentional, unlawful, offensive and harmful. Id. Defendant's plan and scheme in which he committed such acts upon Plaintiff were done willfully and maliciously. Am. Compl. 1 20. As a direct and proximate result of Defendant's assault on Plaintiff, she has suffered and will continue to suffer severe and permanent traumatic injuries, including mental, psychological and emotional damages. Am. Compl. ¶ 21.
+
+Under Count II, Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress, the Amended Complaint alleges as follows:
+
+Defendant's conduct was intentional or reckless. Am. Compl. 1 23. Defendant's conduct with a minor was extreme and outrageous, going beyond all bounds of decency. Am. Compl. 1 24. Defendant committed willful acts of child sexual abuse on Plaintiff Am. Compl. 1 25. These acts resulted in mental or sexual injury to Plaintiff, that caused or were likely to cause Plaintiff's mental or emotional health to be significantly impaired. Am. Compl. ¶ 25. Defendant's conduct caused severe emotional distress to Plaintiff. Am. Compl. ¶ 26. Defendant knew or had reason to know that his intentional and outrageous conduct would cause emotional distress and damage to Plaintiff, or Defendant acted with reckless disregard of the high probability of causing severe emotional distress to Plaintiff Id. As a direct and proximate result of Defendant's intentional or reckless conduct, Plaintiff has suffered and will continue to suffer severe mental anguish and pain. Am. Compl. ¶ 27.
+
+Under Count III, Coercion and Enticement to Sexual Activity in Violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2422, the Amended Complaint alleges as follows:
+
+Defendant used a facility or means of interstate commerce to knowingly persuade, induce or entice Plaintiff, when she was under the age of 18 years, to engage in prostitution or sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense. Am. Compl. ¶ 29. As a result of Defendant's violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2422, Plaintiff has suffered personal injury,
+
+including mental, psychological and emotional damages. Am. Comp!. 1 31.
+
+Defendant argues in his motion that Counts I and III of the Amended Complaint must be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(bX6). Alternatively, Defendant seeks a more definite statement of Counts I and III. Lastly, Defendant argues that the reference in Count III to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 should be stricken as immaterial.
+
+Plaintiff responds that the Court should deny the motion because the pleadings at issue contain a short and plain statement of the claims showing that Plaintiff is entitled to relief in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(aX2). Plaintiff contends that the specific facts sought by Defendant may properly be the subject of discovery, but are not necessary for purposes of pleading.
+
+# Standard of Review
+
+In deciding a motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), a court must accept all factual allegations in a complaint as true and take them in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. See Erickson v. Pardus, 127 S.Ct. 2197, 2200 (2007). To satisfy the pleading requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8, a complaint must contain a short and plain statement showing an entitlement to relief, and the statement must "give the defendant fair notice of what the plaintiffs claim is and the grounds upon which it rests." Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N.A., 534 U.S. 506, 512 (2002) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 8); see also Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 127 S.Ct. 1955, 1964 (2007); Dura Pharm., Inc. v. Broudo, 544 U.S. 336, 346 (2005). This is a liberal pleading requirement, one that does not require a plaintiff to plead with particularity every element of a cause of action. Roe v. Aware Woman Ctr. for Choice, Inc., 253 F.3d 678, 683 (11th Cir. 2001). Instead, the complaint need only "contain either direct or
+
+inferential allegations respecting all the material elements necessary to sustain a recovery under some viable legal theory." Id. (internal citation and quotation omitted). "A complaint need not specify in detail the precise theory giving rise to recovery. All that is required is that the defendant be on notice as to the claim being asserted against him and the grounds on which it rests." v. United Food and Comm'l Workers Intl Union, 866 F.2d 1380, 1384 (11th Cir. 1989).
+
+"While a complaint attacked by a Rule 12(bX6) motion to dismiss does not need detailed factual allegations, [ ] a plaintiff's obligation to provide the `grounds' of his 'entitlement to relief requires more than labels and conclusions, and a formulaic recitation of the elements of a cause of action will not do." Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 127 S.Ct. at 1964-65 (citations omitted). "Factual allegations must be enough to raise a right to relief above the speculative level on the assumption that all of the complaint's allegations are true." Id. at 1965. Plaintiff must plead enough facts to state a plausible basis for the claim. Id.
+
+### Discussion
+
+Counts I alleges a claim for sexual assault and battery. Under Florida law, It is customary to refer to the term "assault and battery" as if it were a legal unit, or a single concept; however, assault and battery are separate and distinct legal concepts, assault being the beginning of an act which, if consummated, constitutes battery. 3A Fla. Jur 2d Assault §1. "'The essential element of an assault is the violence offered, and not actual physical contact,' and `a battery is defined as an unlawful touching or striking or the use of force against the person of another with the intention of bringing about a harmful or offensive contact or apprehension thereof."' McDonald LM, 223 So.2d 553, 555 (Fla. 2n° DCA 1969), quoting 3 Fla.Jur., Assault and Battery, § 3.
+
+Assault is defined as an intentional, unlawful offer of corporal injury to another by force, or force unlawfully directed toward another under such circumstances as to create a fear of imminent peril, coupled with the apparent present ability to effectuate the attempt. Lay v. Kremer, 411 So.2d 1347, 1349 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). A battery consists of the infliction of a harmful or offensive contact upon another with the intent to cause such contact or the apprehension that such contact is imminent. Paul v. Holbrook, 696 So.2d 1311, 1312 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997); v. Atlantic Fed. Say. & Loan Ass'n 454 So.2d 52, 54 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984), review denied, 461 So.2d 116 (FIa.1985).
+
+Defendant does not contend that Plaintiff failed to allege the above-listed elements of the torts of assault and battery in Count I. Instead, Defendant argues that, under the standard of pleading established in Twombly,Plaintiff has failed to set forth sufficient factual allegations to support the pleading. Defendant's argument, in essence, is that in a post-Twombly pleading, a heightened fact pleading of specifics is required. However Twombly did not alter the standard for dismissal under Rule 12(b)(6) in the typical case. As the Court explained in CBT Flint Partners, LLC v. Goodmail Systems, Inc:
+
+In my view Twombly did not radically alter the elementary rules of civil procedure that have governed litigation in the federal courts for the past seventy years. The Court's forced retirement of Conley v. "no set of facts" language does not change the fundamental command of Rule 8 as to what a valid complaint must look like. Indeed, the Court made clear that it was not imposing a heightened pleading standard. Twombly, 127 S.Ct. at 1974 ("[W]e do not require heightened fact pleading of specifics, but only enough facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face."). As a general matter, I am loath to assume that the Supreme Court circumvented the normal channels for amending the Federal Rules. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema, 534 U.S. 506, 515 (2002) ("A requirement of greater specificity for particular claims is a result that must be obtained by the process of amending the Federal Rules, and not by judicial interpretation.") (quotations omitted). Second, to the extent that Twomblymight be plausibly read
+
+to alter the requirements for the sufficiency of a complaint, there should be a strong presumption in favor of narrowly confining the decision to its facts. Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. 264 (1821) ( "It is a maxim not to be disregarded, that general expressions, in every opinion, are to be taken in connection with the case in which those expressions are used."). The Courts "new standard" was merely a specific way to articulate a solution to what it perceived to be a specific pleading problem, in a specific area of law that inflicted a high cost upon antitrust defendants. It was not a broad based new license for federal courts to ramp up pleading requirements.
+
+CBT Flint Partners, LLC v. Goodmail Systems, Inc., 529 F.Supp.2d 1376, 1379 (N.D. Ga. 2007).
+
+In this case, Defendant contends that the pleadings fail to allege the specific facts of "what was done to (Plaintiff);" "what Epstein said and did, if anything, to create fear and apprehension in Plaintiff'; and "what was the intentional offensive or harmful contact?" (Mot. 5). As to these issues, the Amended Complaint alleges as follows: Alone with Plaintiff in an upstairs room of Defendant's mansion, Defendant wore only a towel. Am. Compl. ¶ 12. Defendant acted with intent to cause an offensive contact with Plaintiff, or an imminent apprehension of such a contact, and Plaintiff was thereby put in such imminent apprehension. Am. Compl.1 16. Defendant laid down on the massage table, and sexually assaulted Plaintiff during the massage. Am. Compl. ¶ 12. Defendant made an intentional, unlawful offer of offensive sexual contact toward Plaintiff, creating a reasonable fear of imminent peril. Am. Compl. 1 17. In addition, Defendant masturbated during the massage. Am. Compl. ¶ 12. Defendant intentionally inflicted harmful or offensive contact on the person of Plaintiff, with the intent to cause such contact or the apprehension that such contact is imminent. Am. Compl. ¶ 18. Defendant tortiously committed a sexual assault and battery on Plaintiff Am. Compl. ¶ 19. Defendant's acts were intentional, unlawful, offensive and harmful. Id.
+
+Plaintiff need not set forth more specific facts to support its allegations to satisfy the
+
+notice pleading standard under Rule 8, which requires only that a complaint must set forth a short and plain statement of the facts upon which the claim is based that is sufficient to give the defendant fair notice of what the plaintiff's claims are and the grounds upon which they rest. The parties will be afforded a liberal opportunity for discovery "to disclose more precisely the basis of both claim and defense and to define more narrowly the disputed facts and issues." Conley v. 355 U.S. 41, 48 (1957). Defendant's motion to dismiss or for a more definite statement is DENIED as to Count I.
+
+Counts Ill' alleges a claim for coercion and enticement to sexual activity in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2422. That statute states, in pertinent part,
+
+(b) Whoever, using the mail or any facility or means of interstate or foreign commerce, or within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States knowingly persuades, induces, entices, or coerces any individual who has not attained the age of 18 years, to engage in prostitution or any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense, or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title and imprisoned not less than 10 years or for life.
+
+18 U.S.C. § 2422(b).2
+
+The Amended Complaint alleges: "Epstein used a facility or means of interstate commerce to knowingly persuade, induce or entice Jane Doe, when she was under the age of 18 years, to engage in prostitution or sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a
+
+<sup>&#</sup>x27;Plaintiff mistakenly cites 28 U.S.C. § 2255 in the wherefore clause of Count III, regarding damages sought. Plaintiff acknowledges that this was a typographical error and the correct cite is to 18 U.S.C. § 2255. Defendant's motion to strike the citation to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 in the Amended Complaint is GRANTED. That citation is hereby STRICKEN and substituted with 18 U.S.C. § 2255.
+
+<sup>2</sup> The allegations in the Amended Complaint closely track the language of § 2422(6), making it clear that this is the subsection upon which Plaintiff is relying.
+
+criminal offense." Am. Compl. ¶ 29.
+
+First, the Amended Complaint sufficiently alleges the element of using a facility or means of interstate commerce. See ¶ 29. More specifics are properly the subject of discovery.
+
+Second, Defendant argues that the Amended Complaint fails to set forth underlying factual allegations as to the requisite elements that Defendant knowingly persuaded, induced, enticed, or coerced Plaintiff, when she was under the age of 18 years, to engage in prostitution or sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense. Specifically, Defendant claims that Plaintiff fails to allege with what criminal offense Defendant could have been charged. See 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b). The Amended Complaint states a cause of action for violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2422. However, Defendant's position that Plaintiff must state what part of "to engage in prostitution or sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense" upon which is relying Plaintiff is well-taken.
+
+Rule 12(e) permits a party to move for a "more definite statement of a pleading to which a responsive pleading is allowed but which is so vague or ambiguous that the party cannot reasonably prepare a response." Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(e). As explained by another court, "[t]he claim of the plaintiff in his complaint is sufficiently definite to enable the defendant to know with what it is charged, and it is reasonably able therefrom to respond whether it did the thing charged." Dennis v. Begley Drug Co. of Tennessee, Inc., 53 F.R.D. 608, 609 (E.D. Tenn. 1971). As it is written, ¶ 29 is ambiguous as to whether Plaintiff claims prostitution or another criminal offense (and if so, what offense) with which Defendant could have been charged' The Court
+
+<sup>3</sup> In its opposition, Plaintiff improperly seeks to rely upon a July 10, 2008 letter from A. Villafana, Assistant U.S. Attorney to Plaintiff's counsel. This letter was not referenced in nor attached to the Amended Complaint. It is axiomatic that, at the motion to dismiss stage, the
+
+finds that Defendant is entitled to a more definite statement as tol 29 in order to provide Defendant with sufficient notice to frame a responsive pleading.
+
+## Conclusion
+
+For the reasons stated herein, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and Motion for More Definite Statement, Directed to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (DE 41) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows:
+
+- I. Defendant's motion to dismiss or for a more definite statement as to Count I is DENIED.
+- 2. Defendant's motion to dismiss or for a more definite statement as to Count Ill is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Defendant's motion to dismiss is denied; however, Plaintiff must file another complaint, which includes a more definite statement as to Count III - Coercion and Enticement to Sexual Activity in Violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2422, as explained in this Order.
+- 3. Defendant's motion to strike the citation to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 in the Amended Complaint is GRANTED and that citation is hereby STRICKEN. DONE AND ORDERED in at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County,
+
+Florida, this 12th day of February, 2009.
+
+KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge
+
+copies to: All counsel of record
+
+Court must consider well-pled allegations of the complaint as true and must limit its examination to the four corners of the complaint. Grossman v. Nationsbank, N.A., 225 F.3d 1228, 1231 (1 I th Cir. 2000). Thus, the Court will not consider the letter in ruling on the instant motion.
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739459/EFTA02739459.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739459/EFTA02739459.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7d49466e6ba633bcc05a2c2cc90a8cf90012b636
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739459/EFTA02739459.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,569 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739459.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 11,
+  "chars": 20694,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.63,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            72.08999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            405.5581359863281,
+            72.08999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            405.5581359863281,
+            100.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            100.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "OPINION AND ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS AND \nMOTION FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            149.32799999999997,
+            269.73
+          ],
+          [
+            460.206787109375,
+            269.73
+          ],
+          [
+            460.206787109375,
+            299.2330627441406
+          ],
+          [
+            149.32799999999997,
+            299.2330627441406
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Background",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            69.156,
+            454.4100000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            138.34512329101562,
+            454.4100000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            138.34512329101562,
+            469.863037109375
+          ],
+          [
+            69.156,
+            469.863037109375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Standard of Review",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            68.544,
+            353.96999999999997
+          ],
+          [
+            176.63681030273438,
+            353.96999999999997
+          ],
+          [
+            176.63681030273438,
+            369.7330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            68.544,
+            369.7330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Discussion",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            68.544,
+            439.83000000000004
+          ],
+          [
+            128.39990234375,
+            439.83000000000004
+          ],
+          [
+            128.39990234375,
+            454.863037109375
+          ],
+          [
+            68.544,
+            454.863037109375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Conclusion",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 10,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            69.156,
+            127.98000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            131.8949737548828,
+            127.98000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            131.8949737548828,
+            143.2330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            69.156,
+            143.2330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            49
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            49
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            49
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            59
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            57
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            77
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            31
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            61
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            29
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            59
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            29
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 9,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            55
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 10,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            55
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739459"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739470/EFTA02739470.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739470/EFTA02739470.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..05d031094d2343627c3ea581f774c7faec506be9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739470/EFTA02739470.md
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+#### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRie
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+# NOTICE OF CHANGE OF NAME OF PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL
+
+YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that counsel of record for Plaintiff has changed its name from Herman & Mermelstein, P.A., to:
+
+# MERMELSTEIN & HOROWITZ, P.A.
+
+18205 Biscayne Boulevard
+
+Suite 2218
+
+Miami, Florida 33160
+
+Telephone: (305) 931-2200
+
+Facsimile: (305) 931-0877
+
+Please direct all future pleadings and correspondence to the above-named counsel.
+
+Dated: February 23, 2009 Respectfully submitted,
+
+By: s/ Adam D. Horowitz
+
+Stuart S. Mermelstein (FL Bar No. 947245)
+
+ssm@sexabuseattorney.com
+
+Adam D. Horowitz (FL Bar No. 376980)
+
+ahorowitz@sexabuseattomey.com
+
+MERMELSTEIN & HOROWITZ, P.A.
+
+Attorneys for Plaintiffs Jane Doe
+
+18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218
+
+Miami, Florida 33160
+
+Tel: 305-931-2200
+
+Fax: 305-931-0877
+
+#### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
+
+I hereby certify that on February 23, 2009, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day to all parties on the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those parties who are not authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing.
+
+s/ Adam D. Horowitz
+
+### SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. jgoldberger@agwpa.com
+
+Robert D. Critton, Esq. rcritton@bciclaw.com
+
+s/ Adam D. Horowitz
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739470/EFTA02739470.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739470/EFTA02739470.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3b7ac827bd93781ae54359ddf935477602feea72
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739470/EFTA02739470.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,254 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739470.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 3,
+  "chars": 1672,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.34,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            405.95098876953125,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            405.95098876953125,
+            100.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            100.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "NOTICE OF CHANGE OF NAME OF PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            132.804,
+            281.07
+          ],
+          [
+            479.1841125488281,
+            281.07
+          ],
+          [
+            479.1841125488281,
+            296.2330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            132.804,
+            296.2330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "MERMELSTEIN & HOROWITZ, P.A.",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            218.484,
+            366.12
+          ],
+          [
+            429.6104736328125,
+            366.12
+          ],
+          [
+            429.6104736328125,
+            381.363037109375
+          ],
+          [
+            218.484,
+            381.363037109375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            227.052,
+            85.05
+          ],
+          [
+            385.0019836425781,
+            85.05
+          ],
+          [
+            385.0019836425781,
+            99.363037109375
+          ],
+          [
+            227.052,
+            99.363037109375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "SERVICE LIST \nDOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN \nUnited States District Court, Southern District of Florida",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            156.67200000000003,
+            70.47
+          ],
+          [
+            455.16455078125,
+            70.47
+          ],
+          [
+            455.16455078125,
+            114.7330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            156.67200000000003,
+            114.7330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            61
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            31
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            17
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            9
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            19
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739470"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739473/EFTA02739473.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739473/EFTA02739473.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..43d558bdbc4151b42ed15d1ebc48dd7330ec0481
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739473/EFTA02739473.md
@@ -0,0 +1,122 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+#### SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
+
+Plaintiff, Jane Doe No.3 ("Jane" or "Jane Doe"), brings this Complaint against Jeffrey Epstein, as follows:
+
+#### Parties, jurisdiction and Venue
+
+- 1. Jane Doe is a citizen and resident of the State of Florida, and is sui juris.
+- 2. This Complaint is brought under a fictitious name to protect the identity of the Plaintiff because this Complaint makes sensitive allegations of sexual assault and abuse upon her when she was a minor.
+  - 3. Defendant Jeffrey Epstein is a citizen and resident of the State of New York.
+  - 4. This is an action for damages in excess of \$50 million.
+- 5. This Court has jurisdiction of this action and the claims set forth herein pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1332(a), as the matter in controversy (i) exceeds \$75,000, exclusive of interest and costs; and (ii) is between citizens of different states.
+- 6. This Court has venue of this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1391(a) as a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred in this District.
+
+# Factual Allegations
+
+7. At all relevant times, Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") was an adult male, 52 years old. Epstein is a financier and money manager with a secret clientele limited exclusively to billionaires. He is himself a man of tremendous wealth, power and influence. He maintains his principal home in New York and also owns residences in New Mexico, St. and Palm Beach, FL. The allegations herein concern Epstein's conduct while at his lavish estate in Palm Beach.
+
+8. Upon information and belief, Epstein has a sexual preference and obsession for underage minor girls. He engaged in a plan and scheme in which he gained access to primarily economically disadvantaged minor girls in his home, sexually assaulted these girls, and then gave them money. In or about 2004-2005, Jane Doe, then 16 years old, fell into Epstein's trap and became one of his victims.
+
+9. Upon information and belief, Jeffrey Epstein carried out his scheme and assaulted girls in Florida, New York and on his private island, known as Little St. James, in St.
+
+10. An integral player in Epstein's Florida scheme was . a Palm Beach Community College student from Loxahatchee, Florida. She recruited girls ostensibly to give a wealthy man a massage for monetary compensation in his Palm Beach mansion. Under Epstein's plan, would be contacted when Epstein was planning to be at his Palm Beach residence or soon after he had arrived there. Epstein or someone on his behalf directed to bring one or more underage girls to the residence. , upon information and belief, generally sought out economically disadvantaged underage girls from Loxahatchee and surrounding areas who would be enticed by the money being offered - generally \$200 to \$300 per "massage" session - and who were perceived as less likely to complain to authorities or have credibility if allegations of improper conduct were made. This was an important element of Epstein's plan.
+
+II. Epstein's plan and scheme reflected a particular pattern and method. Upon arrival at Epstein's mansion, the victim would be brought to the kitchen. She would then be led up a flight of stairs to a bedroom that contained a massage table in addition to other furnishings. Once the girl was alone in this room, Epstein would enter wearing only a towel to cover his private area. He then would lay down on the massage table and perform one or more lewd, lascivious and sexual acts, including masturbation and touching the girl sexually.
+
+12. Consistent with the foregoing plan and scheme, recruited Jane Doe to give Epstein a massage for monetary compensation. brought Jane to Epstein's mansion in Palm Beach. Jane was led up the flight of stairs to the room with the massage table. She was alone in the room when Epstein arrived wearing a towel to cover his private parts. He laid down on the massage table, and sexually assaulted Jane Doe during the massage. In addition, Jeffrey Epstein masturbated during the massage.
+
+13. After Epstein had completed the assault, he left the room. Jane was then able to leave the room and go back down the stairs. She then met again who brought Jane home. Jane was paid \$200 by Epstein. was also paid by Epstein for bringing Jane to him.
+
+14. As a result of this encounter with Epstein, the 16-year old Jane experienced trauma, shock, confusion, shame, humiliation and embarrassment.
+
+### COUNT I Sexual Assault and Batten
+
+15. Plaintiff Jane Doe repeats and realleges paragraphs 1 through 14 above.
+
+16. Epstein acted with intent to cause an offensive contact with Jane Doe, or an imminent apprehension of such a contact, and Jane Doe was thereby put in such imminent apprehension.
+
+17. Epstein made an intentional. unlawful offer of offensive sexual contact toward Jane
+
+Doe, creating a reasonable fear of imminent peril.
+
+18. Epstein intentionally inflicted harmful or offensive contact on the person of Jane Doe, with the intent to cause such contact or the apprehension that such contact is imminent.
+
+19. Epstein tortiously committed a sexual assault and battery on Jane Doe. Epstein's acts were intentional, unlawful, offensive and harmful.
+
+20. Epstein's plan and scheme in which he committed such acts upon Jane Doe were done willfully and maliciously.
+
+21. As a direct and proximate result of Epstein's assault on Jane, she has suffered and will continue to suffer severe and permanent traumatic injuries, including mental, psychological and emotional damages.
+
+WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 3 demands judgment against Defendant Jeffrey Epstein for compensatory damages, punitive damages, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper.
+
+### COUNT H Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress
+
+22. Plaintiff Jane Doe repeats and realleges paragraphs 1 through 14 above.
+
+23. Epstein's conduct was intentional or reckless.
+
+24. Epstein's conduct with a minor was extreme and outrageous, going beyond all bounds of decency.
+
+25. Epstein committed willful acts of child sexual abuse on Jane Doe. These acts resulted in mental or sexual injury to Jane Doe, that caused or were likely to cause Jane Doe's mental or emotional health to be significantly impaired.
+
+26. Epstein's conduct caused severe emotional distress to Jane Doe. Epstein knew or had
+
+reason to know that his intentional and outrageous conduct would cause emotional distress and damage to Jane Doe, or Epstein acted with reckless disregard of the high probability of causing severe emotional distress to Jane Doe.
+
+27. As a direct and proximate result of Epstein's intentional or reckless conduct, Jane Doe, has suffered and will continue to suffer severe mental anguish and pain.
+
+WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 3 demands judgment against Defendant Jeffrey Epstein for compensatory damages, costs, punitive damages, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper.
+
+## COUNT III Coercion and Enticement to Sexual Activity in Violation of 18 U.S.C. §2422
+
+28. Plaintiff Jane Doe repeats and realleges paragraphs I through 14 above.
+
+29. Epstein used a facility or means of interstate commerce to knowingly persuade, induce or entice Jane Doe, when she was under the age of 18 years, to engage in prostitution or sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense.
+
+30. On June 30, 2008, Epstein entered a plea of guilty to violations of Florida §§ 796.07 and 796.03, in the 15th Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County (Case nos. 2008-cf-009381AXXXMB and 2006-cf-009454AXXXMB), for conduct involving the same plan and scheme as alleged herein.
+
+31. As to PlaintiffJane Doe, Epstein could have been charged with criminal violations of Florida Statute §796.07(2) (including subsections (c), (d), (e), (f), (g), and (h) thereof), and other criminal offenses including violations of Florida Statutes §§ 798.02 and 800.04 (including subsections (5), (6) and (7) thereof).
+
+32. Epstein's acts and conduct are in violation of 18 U.S.C. §2422.
+
+33. As a result of Epstein's violation of 18 U.S.C. §2422, Plaintiff has suffered personal injury, including mental, psychological and emotional damages.
+
+34. Plaintiff hired Herman & Mermelstein, P.A., in this matter and agreed to pay them a reasonable attorneys' fee.
+
+WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 3 demands judgment against Defendant Jeffrey Epstein for all damages available under 18 U.S.C. §2255(a), including without limitation, actual and compensatory damages, costs of suit, and attorneys' fees, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper.
+
+#### JURY TRIAL DEMAND
+
+Plaintiff demands a jury trial in this action on all claims so triable.
+
+Dated: February 27, 2009
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+By: s/ Adam D. Horowitz Stuart S. Mermelstein (FL Bar No. 947245) ssm@sexabuseattorney.com Adam D. Horowitz (FL Bar No. 376980) ahorowitz@sexabuseattomey.com MERMELSTEIN & HOROWITZ, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiff 18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160 Tel: 305-931-2200 Fax: 305-931-0877
+
+## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
+
+I hereby certify that on February 27, 2009, I electronically fi led the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day to all parties on the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those parties who are not authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing.
+
+/s/ Adam D. Horowitz
+
+## SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. igoldberger@agwpa.com
+
+Robert D. Critton, Esq. reritton@bc1claw.com
+
+/s/ Adam D. Horowitz
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739473/EFTA02739473.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739473/EFTA02739473.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1367331ac05afe445bbcf74ba3225b401a8f8be5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739473/EFTA02739473.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,567 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739473.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 8,
+  "chars": 9943,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.14,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            405.95098876953125,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            405.95098876953125,
+            115.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            115.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            207.46800000000002,
+            296.46
+          ],
+          [
+            405.8067626953125,
+            296.46
+          ],
+          [
+            405.8067626953125,
+            310.56353759765625
+          ],
+          [
+            207.46800000000002,
+            310.56353759765625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Parties, jurisdiction and Venue",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            222.768,
+            380.7
+          ],
+          [
+            389.681396484375,
+            380.7
+          ],
+          [
+            389.681396484375,
+            394.863037109375
+          ],
+          [
+            222.768,
+            394.863037109375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Factual Allegations",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            253.98,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            359.3172912597656,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            359.3172912597656,
+            101.68353271484375
+          ],
+          [
+            253.98,
+            101.68353271484375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "COUNT I \nSexual Assault and Batten",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            233.17200000000003,
+            561.3299999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            378.81658935546875,
+            561.3299999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            378.81658935546875,
+            590.6030120849609
+          ],
+          [
+            233.17200000000003,
+            590.6030120849609
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "COUNT H \nIntentional Infliction of Emotional Distress",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            192.168,
+            449.55000000000007
+          ],
+          [
+            419.6750183105469,
+            449.55000000000007
+          ],
+          [
+            419.6750183105469,
+            478.863037109375
+          ],
+          [
+            192.168,
+            478.863037109375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "COUNT III \nCoercion and Enticement to Sexual Activity in Violation of 18 U.S.C. \u00a72422",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            111.99600000000001,
+            309.42
+          ],
+          [
+            501.763671875,
+            309.42
+          ],
+          [
+            501.763671875,
+            338.9830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            111.99600000000001,
+            338.9830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "JURY TRIAL DEMAND",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            239.29200000000003,
+            310.23
+          ],
+          [
+            374.73492431640625,
+            310.23
+          ],
+          [
+            374.73492431640625,
+            324.80352783203125
+          ],
+          [
+            239.29200000000003,
+            324.80352783203125
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            227.052,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            385.0019836425781,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            385.0019836425781,
+            100.863037109375
+          ],
+          [
+            227.052,
+            100.863037109375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "SERVICE LIST \nDOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN \nUnited States District Court, Southern District of Florida",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            156.67200000000003,
+            85.05
+          ],
+          [
+            455.16455078125,
+            85.05
+          ],
+          [
+            455.16455078125,
+            129.363037109375
+          ],
+          [
+            156.67200000000003,
+            129.363037109375
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            52
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            11
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            50
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            21
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            21
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            11
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739473"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739481/EFTA02739481.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739481/EFTA02739481.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..da68ab7065dc4daaf1edae2694cfe0e74e91d466
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739481/EFTA02739481.md
@@ -0,0 +1,140 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRAa
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+v.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE & OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES
+
+Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, by and through his undersigned attorneys, serves his responses and objections to Plaintiffs December 9, 2008 Amended First Set Of Interrogatories To Defendant Jeffrey Epstein, attached hereto.
+
+## Certificate of Service
+
+<sup>I</sup>HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing has been sent by fax and U.S. Mail to the following addressees this 26th day of January, 2009:
+
+Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Jeffrey Marc Herman, Esq. Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. 18205 Biscayne Boulevard Suite 2218 Miami, FL 33160 305-931-2200 Fax: 305-931-0877 ahorowitzehermanlaw.com jhermanabermanlaw.com Iriverae hermanlaw.com Counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe #3
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 561-659-8300 Fax: 561-835-8691 jagesqabellsouth.net Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+![]()MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ.  
+Florida Bar #617296  
+mpike@bclclaw.com
+
+BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN  
+515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400  
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401  
+561/842-2820 Phone  
+561/515-3148 Fax
+
+(Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein)
+
+## DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S ANSWERS AND OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES
+
+Interrogatory No. 1. Identify all employees who performed work of services inside the Palm Beach Residence.
+
+Answer: Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the interrogatories as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any questions relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, Defendant objects as the interrogatory is overbroad and seeks information that is neither relevant to the subject matter of the pending action nor does it appear reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Plaintiffs Complaint alleges a time period of "in or about 2004-2005." Plaintiffs interrogatory seeks information for a time period from January 1, 2003 until present. Also, see "Employee" as defined in paragraph g of Plaintiffs interrogatories.
+
+Interrogatory No. 2. Identify all Employees not identified in response to interrogatory no. 1 who at any time came to Defendant's Palm Beach Residence.
+
+Answer: Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the interrogatories as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any questions relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, Defendant objects as the interrogatory is overbroad and seeks information that is neither relevant to the subject matter of the pending action nor does it appear reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Plaintiffs Complaint alleges a time period of "in or about 2004-2005." Plaintiffs interrogatory seeks information for "all Employees" "who at any time" came to the residence. Also, see "Employee" as defined in paragraph g of Plaintiffs interrogatories.
+
+**Interrogatory No. 3.** Identify all persons who came to the Palm Beach Residence and who gave a massage or were asked to give a massage to Defendant.
+
+**Answer:** Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the interrogatories as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any questions relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, Defendant objects as the interrogatory is overbroad and seeks information that is neither relevant to the subject matter of the pending action nor does it appear reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Plaintiff's Complaint alleges a time period of "in or about 2004-2005."
+
+**Interrogatory No. 4.** Identify all persons who came to the New York Residence and who gave a massage or were asked to give a massage to Defendant.
+
+**Answer:** Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the interrogatories as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any questions relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, Defendant objects as the interrogatory is overbroad and seeks information that is neither relevant to the subject matter of the pending action nor does it appear reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Plaintiff's Complaint alleges a time period of "in or about 2004-2005."
+
+**Interrogatory No. 5.** Identify all persons who came to the New Mexico Residence and who gave a massage or were asked to give a massage to Defendant.
+
+**Answer:** Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the interrogatories as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any questions relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my
+
+federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, Defendant objects as the interrogatory is overbroad and seeks information that is neither relevant to the subject matter of the pending action nor does it appear reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Plaintiff's Complaint alleges a time period of "in or about 2004-2005."
+
+**Interrogatory No. 6.** Identify all persons who came to the St. [REDACTED] Residence and who gave a massage or were asked to give a massage to Defendant.
+
+**Answer:** Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the interrogatories as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any questions relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, Defendant objects as the interrogatory is overbroad and seeks information that is neither relevant to the subject matter of the pending action nor does it appear reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Plaintiff's Complaint alleges a time period of "in or about 2004-2005."
+
+**Interrogatory No. 7.** List all the time periods during which Jeffrey Epstein was present in the State of Florida, including for each the date he arrive and the date he departed.
+
+**Answer:** Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the interrogatories as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any questions relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, Defendant also objects as the interrogatory is overbroad and seeks information that is neither relevant to the subject matter of the pending action nor does it appear reasonably calculated to lead to the
+
+discovery of admissible evidence. Plaintiffs Complaint alleges a time period of "in or about 2004-2005." Plaintiffs interrogatory seeks information for a time period from January 1, 2003 until present.
+
+Interrogatory No. 8. Identify all of Jeffrey Epstein health care providers in the past (10) ten years, including without limitation, psychologists, psychiatrists, mental health counselors, physicians, hospitals and treatment facilities.
+
+Answer: Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the interrogatories as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any questions relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, Defendant also objects as the interrogatory is overbroad and seeks information that is neither relevant to the subject matter of the pending action nor does it appear reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. In addition, such information is privileged pursuant to Rule 501, Fed. Evid., and §90.503, Fla.Evid. Code. In addition, such information is protected by the provisions of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA).
+
+Interrogatory No. 9. List all items in Jeffrey Epstein's possession in Palm Beach, Florida, at any time during the period of these interrogatories, which were used or intended to be used as sexual aids, sex toys, massage aids, and/or vibrators, and for each, list the manufacturer, model number (if applicable), and its present location.
+
+Answer: Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the interrogatories as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any questions relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, Defendant also objects as the interrogatory is overbroad and seeks information that is neither relevant to the subject matter of the pending action nor does it appear reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Plaintiffs Amended Complaint alleges a time period of "in or about 2004 — 2005," while Plaintiffs interrogatory seeks information from
+
+January 1, 2003, until present. Further, the request is meant to embarrass and harass the Defendant.
+
+**Interrogatory No. 10.** Identify all persons who provide transportation services to Jeffrey Epstein, whether as employees or independent contractors, including without limitation, chauffeurs and aircraft crew.
+
+**Answer:** Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the interrogatories as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any questions relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, Defendant also objects as the interrogatory is overbroad and seeks information that is neither relevant to the subject matter of the pending action nor does it appear reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Plaintiff places no time limitation.
+
+**Interrogatory No. 11.** Identify all telephone numbers used by Epstein, including cellular phones and land lines in any of his residences, by stating the complete telephone number and the name of the service provider.
+
+**Answer:** Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the interrogatories as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any questions relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, Defendant also objects as the interrogatory is overbroad and seeks information that is neither relevant to the subject matter of the pending action nor does it appear reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Plaintiff's allegations claim a time period of "in or about 2004-2005" and involve Defendant's Palm Beach residence.
+
+**Interrogatory No. 12.** Identify all telephone numbers of employees of Epstein, used in the course or scope of their employment, including cellular phones and land lines in any of his residences, by stating the complete telephone number and the name of the service provider.
+
+**Answer:** Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the interrogatories as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any questions relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, Defendant objects as the interrogatory is overbroad and seeks information that is neither relevant to the subject matter of the pending action nor does it appear reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Plaintiff's allegations claim a time period of "in or about 2004-2005" and involve Defendant's Palm Beach residence.
+
+**Interrogatory No. 13.** List the names and addresses of all persons who are believed or known by your, your agents, or your attorneys to have any knowledge concerning any of the issues in this lawsuit; and specify the subject matter about which the witness has knowledge.
+
+**Answer:** Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the interrogatories as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any questions relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, the interrogatory seeks information that is attorney-client and work product privileged as it seeks information known by Defendant's attorneys. The interrogatory is so overbroad that Defendant cannot reasonably form a response, including the raising of additional privileges which may apply. Without waiving any objection, see Rule 26 disclosures made by Defendant's counsel in this case.
+
+**Interrogatory No. 14.** State the name and address of every person known to you, your agents, or your attorneys who has knowledge about, possession, or custody, or control of, any model, plat, map, drawing, motion picture, videotape or photograph pertaining to any fact or issue involved in this controversy; and describe as to each, what item such person has, the name and address of the person who took or prepared it, and the date it was taken or prepared.
+
+**Answer:** Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the interrogatories as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any questions relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, the interrogatory seeks information that is attorney-client and work product privileged as it seeks information known by Defendant's attorneys.
+
+**Interrogatory No. 15.** Identify all persons who have made a claim, complaint, demand or threat against you relating to alleged sexual abuse or misconduct on a minor, and for each provide the following information:
+
+1. a. The person's full name, last known address and telephone number;
+2. b. The person's attorney, if represented;
+3. c. The date of the alleged incident(s);
+4. d. If a civil case has been filed by or on behalf of the person, the case number and identifying information.
+
+**Answer:** Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the interrogatories as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any questions relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges and without waiving such objection, with regard to subparagraph (d), Defendant's counsel states that such information is public record and equally attainable by Plaintiff.
+
+**Interrogatory No. 16.** State the facts upon which you intend to rely for each denial of a pleading allegation and for each affirmative defense you intend to make in these cases.
+
+**Answer:** Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the interrogatories as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any questions relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk
+
+losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, no answer to the Amended Complaint has been filed by defense counsel in this case; however, Defendant does not intend to waive his constitutional privilege against self-incrimination. Defendant further objects in that Plaintiff's interrogatory attempts to obtain discovery in other cases filed by her undersigned counsel.
+
+**Interrogatory No. 17.** Identify all witnesses from whom you have obtained or requested a written, transcribed or recorded statement relating to any issue in these cases, and for each, in addition to the witness's identifying information, state the date of the statement and identify the person taking the statement.
+
+**Answer:** Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the interrogatories as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any questions relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, Defendant objects to this interrogatory in that it seeks information that is attorney-client and work product privileged. In addition, the request is overbroad in that it seeks information "relating to any issue."
+
+![]()STATE OF Florida )  
+)  
+COUNTY OF Palm Beach )
+
+I hereby certify that on this day, before me, an officer duly authorized to administer oaths and take acknowledgments, personally appeared Jeffrey Epstein, known to me to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing Interrogatories who
+
+Page 11
+
+acknowledged before me that he/she executed the same, that I relied upon the following form of identification of the above-named person: personally known/identification and that an oath was/was not taken.
+
+WITNESS my hand and official seal in the County and State last aforesaid this day of -SaYisar r 1 2009.
+
+![](_page_10_Picture_6.jpeg)
+
+(SEAL)
+
+iv (.' act.W, PR=Ivact eC; r Algr% Notary Public/State oT Florida Commission #: My Commission Expires:
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739481/EFTA02739481.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739481/EFTA02739481.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..467dfe7b173c7cb68e04547f71d712f2bbc5b440
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739481/EFTA02739481.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,453 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739481.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 11,
+  "chars": 26226,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 12.37,
+  "image_assets": [
+    "_page_10_Picture_6.jpeg"
+  ],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            201.677,
+            83.53299999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            412.4989013671875,
+            83.53299999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            412.4989013671875,
+            111.55401611328125
+          ],
+          [
+            201.677,
+            111.55401611328125
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE & OBJECTIONS \nTO PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            135.47299999999998,
+            293.582
+          ],
+          [
+            475.2424011230469,
+            293.582
+          ],
+          [
+            475.2424011230469,
+            321.6473388671875
+          ],
+          [
+            135.47299999999998,
+            321.6473388671875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Certificate of Service",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            264.203,
+            416.854
+          ],
+          [
+            380.7851257324219,
+            416.854
+          ],
+          [
+            380.7851257324219,
+            429.83000000000004
+          ],
+          [
+            264.203,
+            429.83000000000004
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S ANSWERS AND OBJECTIONS TO \nPLAINTIFF'S AMENDED FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            122.6,
+            103.80799999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            492.15570068359375,
+            103.80799999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            492.15570068359375,
+            132.187255859375
+          ],
+          [
+            122.6,
+            132.187255859375
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            213
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            39
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            21
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            477
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            14
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            524
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            31
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            14
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 9,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            14
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 10,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            48
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            20
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Picture",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739481"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739481/_page_10_Picture_6.jpeg b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739481/_page_10_Picture_6.jpeg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9fddc37de7548ffca66e334bd057b2e171c3cf85
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739481/_page_10_Picture_6.jpeg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:26d2fa5bc898b72bc63a18cd03ecdf69807a82a6ab446ccb042a6dbe77223bdc
+size 12229
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739492/EFTA02739492.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739492/EFTA02739492.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ea4b23ae4f626e9d2f4fa88e98d6c998a863bc58
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739492/EFTA02739492.md
@@ -0,0 +1,158 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA-Ma
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+v.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE & OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
+
+Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, by and through his undersigned counsel, serves his responses and objections to Plaintiffs Amended First Request For Production To Defendant, dated December 9, 2008.
+
+Request No. 1. The list provided to you by the U.S. Attorney of individuals whom the U.S. Attorney was prepared to name in an Indictment as victims of an offense by Mr. Epstein enumerated in 18 U.S.C. §2255.
+
+Response: Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the production request as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to produce all relevant documents regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that at the present time I cannot select, authenticate, and produce documents relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference
+
+under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, the information sought is privileged and confidential, and inadmissible pursuant to the terms of the deferred prosecution agreement, Fed. Rule of Evidence 410 and 408, and §90.410, Fla. Stat. Further, the request is overly broad, work product, attorney-client privileged, and confidential. In addition, the request seeks information concerning persons, not parties to this litigation, whose privacy rights are implicated.
+
+Request No. 2. All documents referring or relating to the United States' agreement with Defendant to defer federal prosecution subject to certain conditions, including without limitation, the operative agreement between Defendant and the United States and all amendments, revisions and supplements thereto.
+
+Response: Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the production request as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to produce all relevant documents regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that at the present time I cannot select, authenticate, and produce documents relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my
+
+constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, the information sought is privileged and confidential, and inadmissible pursuant to the terms of the deferred prosecution agreement, Fed. Rule of Evidence 410 and 408, and §90.410, Fla. Stat. Further, the request is overly broad, work product, attorney-client privileged, and confidential. In addition, the request seeks information concerning persons, not parties to this litigation, whose privacy rights are implicated.
+
+Request No. 3. All documents referring or relating to Defendant's agreement with the State of Florida on his plea of guilty to violations of Florida Criminal Statutes, including without limitation, the operative plea agreement and any amendments, revisions and supplements thereto.
+
+Response: Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the production request as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to produce all relevant documents regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that at the present time I cannot select, authenticate, and produce documents relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, the
+
+information sought is privileged and confidential, and inadmissible pursuant to the terms of the deferred prosecution agreement, Fed. Rule of Evidence 410 and 408, and §90.410, Fla. Stat. Further, the request is overly broad, work product, attorney-client privileged, and confidential. In addition, the request seeks information concerning persons, not parties to this litigation, whose privacy rights are implicated. Whatever public documents exist are in the State Court file and equally accessible to Plaintiff.
+
+Request No.4. All documents obtained in discovery or investigation relating to either the Florida Criminal Case or the Federal Criminal Case, including without limitation, documents obtained from any federal, state, or local law enforcement agency, the State Attorney's office and the United States Attorney's office.
+
+Response: Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the production request as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to produce all relevant documents regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that at the present time I cannot select, authenticate, and produce documents relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth. Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, the
+
+information sought is privileged and confidential, and inadmissible pursuant to the terms of the deferred prosecution agreement, Fed. Rule of Evidence 410 and 408, and §90.410, Fla. Stat. Further, the request is overly broad, work product, attorney-client privileged, and confidential. In addition, the request seeks information concerning persons, not parties to this litigation, whose privacy rights are implicated. Request No. 4 seeks documents that are attorney-client and work product privileged in that it seeks "all documents obtained in discovery or investigation relating either to the Florida Criminal Case or the Federal Criminal Case ... ." In addition, such documents are privileged and confidential as they are the subject of a pending investigation.
+
+Request No. 5. All telephone records and other documents reflecting telephone calls made by or to Defendant, including without limitation, telephone logs and message pads.
+
+Response: Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the production request as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to produce all relevant documents regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that at the present time I cannot select, authenticate, and produce documents relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the
+
+Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, the information sought is privileged and confidential, and inadmissible pursuant to the terms of the deferred prosecution agreement, Fed. Rule of Evidence 410 and 408, and §90.410, Fla. Stat. Further, the request is overly broad, work product, attorney-client privileged, and confidential. In addition, the request seeks information concerning persons, not parties to this litigation, whose privacy rights are implicated. Defendant objects as the request is overbroad and seeks information that is neither relevant to the subject matter of the pending action nor does it appear reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Plaintiffs complaint alleges a time period of "in or about 2004 — 2005." Plaintiffs request seeks information for a time period of January 1, 2003 until present regarding any and all telephone records and other documents reflecting any and all telephone calls made to or by Defendant. As phrased, the request includes attorney-client and work product privileged information, as well as records and documents of calls having absolutely no relationship to any of the allegations in this action.
+
+Request No. 6. All telephone records and other documents reflecting telephone calls made by or to Defendant, including without limitation, telephone logs and message pads, reflecting telephone calls made by or to employees.
+
+Response: Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the production request as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to produce all relevant documents regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that at the present time I cannot select, authenticate, and produce
+
+documents relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, the information sought is privileged and confidential, and inadmissible pursuant to the terms of the deferred prosecution agreement, Fed. Rule of Evidence 410 and 408, and §90.410, Fla. Stat. Further, the request is overly broad, work product, attorney-client privileged, and confidential. In addition, as defined by Plaintiff in paragraph g of her request, the term employee is overly broad and encompasses information that is neither relevant to the subject matter of the pending action nor does it appear reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Further, the request seeks information pertaining to person who are not parties to this action and whose privacy rights are implicated.
+
+Request No. 7. All surveillance videos, slides, film, videotape, digital recording or other audio or video depiction or image of the Palm Beach Residence.
+
+Response: Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the production request as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to produce all relevant documents regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that at the present time I cannot select, authenticate, and produce documents relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my
+
+Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, the information sought is privileged and confidential, and inadmissible pursuant to the terms of the deferred prosecution agreement, Fed. Rule of Evidence 410 and 408, and §90.410, Fla. Stat. Further, the request is overly broad, work product, attorney-client privileged, and confidential. In addition, the request seeks information concerning persons, not parties to this litigation, whose privacy rights are implicated. Plaintiffs complaint alleges a time period of "in or about 2004 — 2005." Plaintiffs request seeks information for a time period of January 1, <sup>2003</sup> until present regarding "all surveillance videos, etc., or image of the Palm Beach Residence."
+
+Request No. 8. All documents referring or relating to Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 2, including without limitation, web pages, social networking site pages, correspondence, videotapes and audiotapes.
+
+Response: Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the production request as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to produce all relevant documents regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that at the present time I cannot select, authenticate, and produce documents relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my
+
+Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, the information sought is privileged and confidential, and inadmissible pursuant to the terms of the deferred prosecution agreement, Fed. Rule of Evidence 410 and 408, and §90.410, Fla. Stat. Further, the request is overly broad, work product, attorney-client privileged, and confidential.
+
+Request No. 9. All statements taken, transcribed or recorded from any person referring or relating to Defendant's sexual conduct, massages given to Defendant or any issue in these cases.
+
+Response: Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the production request as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to produce all relevant documents regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that at the present time I cannot select, authenticate, and produce documents relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, the information sought is privileged and confidential, and inadmissible pursuant to the terms of the deferred prosecution agreement, Fed. Rule of Evidence 410 and 408, and §90.410, Fla. Stat. Further, the request is overly broad, work product, attorney-client privileged, and confidential.
+
+Request No. 10. All documents referring to or relating to air travel and aircraft used by Defendant, including without limitation, flight logs and flight manifests.
+
+Response: Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the production request as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to produce all relevant documents regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that at the present time I cannot select, authenticate, and produce documents relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, the information sought is privileged and confidential, and inadmissible pursuant to the terms of the deferred prosecution agreement, Fed. Rule of Evidence 410 and 408, and §90.410, Fla. Stat. Further, the request is overly broad, work product, attorney-client privileged, and confidential. Plaintiffs complaint alleges a time period of "in or about 2004 — 2005." Plaintiffs request seeks documents for a
+
+time period of January 1, 2003 until present regarding air travel and aircraft used by Defendant.
+
+Request No. 11. Any and all documents referring to or relating to modeling agencies, including but not limited to documents relating to or reflecting communications with female models.
+
+Response: Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the production request as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to produce all relevant documents regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that at the present time I cannot select, authenticate, and produce documents relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, the information sought is privileged and confidential, and inadmissible pursuant to the terms of the deferred prosecution agreement, Fed. Rule of Evidence 410 and 408, and §90.410, Fla. Stat. Further, the request is overly broad, work product, attorney-client privileged, and confidential. In addition, the request seeks information concerning persons, not parties to this litigation, whose privacy rights are implicated. Plaintiffs complaint alleges a time period of "in or about 2004 — 2005." Plaintiffs request has no time limitation.
+
+Request No. 12. All photographs, videotapes, digital images and other documents depicting or showing females who, at the time thereof, were under the age of 21, which were taken or created by or for Defendant and not intended for sale commercially to the public.
+
+Response: Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the production request as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to produce all relevant documents regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that at the present time I cannot select, authenticate, and produce documents relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, the information sought is privileged and confidential, and inadmissible pursuant to the terms of the deferred prosecution agreement, Fed. Rule of Evidence 410 and 408, and §90.410, Fla. Stat. Further, the request is overly broad, work product, attorney-client privileged, and confidential. In addition, the request seeks information concerning persons, not parties to this litigation, whose privacy rights are implicated. Plaintiff's complaint alleges a time period of "in or about 2004 — 2005." Plaintiffs request has no time limitation.
+
+Request No. 13. All photographs and painting of females which were displayed in any of Defendant's homes or residences in the time frame of these requests, including without limitation, photographs in standing or sifting frames or wall frames.
+
+Response: Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the production request as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to produce all relevant documents regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that at the present time I cannot select, authenticate, and produce documents relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, the information sought is privileged and confidential, and inadmissible pursuant to the terms of the deferred prosecution agreement, Fed. Rule of Evidence 410 and 408, and §90.410, Fla. Stat. Further, the request is overly broad, work product, attorney-client privileged, and confidential. In addition, the request seeks information concerning persons, not parties to this litigation, whose privacy rights are implicated. Plaintiffs complaint alleges a time period of "in or about 2004 — 2005." Plaintiff's request has no time limitation.
+
+Request No. 14. Any and all documents consisting of, referring or relating to communications between Jeffrey Epstein and including, but not limited to, letters, notes, text messages, messages on social networking sites, and e-mails.
+
+Response: Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the production request as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to produce all relevant documents regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that at the present time I cannot select, authenticate, and produce documents relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, the information sought is privileged and confidential, and inadmissible pursuant to the terms of the deferred prosecution agreement, Fed. Rule of Evidence 410 and 408, and §90.410, Fla. Stat. Further, the request is overly broad, work product, attorney-client privileged, and confidential. In addition, the request seeks information concerning persons, not parties to this litigation, whose privacy rights are implicated. Plaintiff's complaint alleges a time period of "in or about 2004 — 2005." Plaintiffs request has no time limitation.
+
+Request No. 15. Any and all documents consisting of, referring or relating to communications between Jeffrey Epstein and , including, but not limited to, letters, notes, text messages, messages on social networking sites, and e-mails.
+
+Response: Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the production request as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to produce all relevant documents regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that at the present time I cannot select, authenticate, and produce documents relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, the information sought is privileged and confidential, and inadmissible pursuant to the terms of the deferred prosecution agreement, Fed. Rule of Evidence 410 and 408, and §90.410, Fla. Stat. Further, the request is overly broad, work product, attorney-client privileged, and confidential. In addition, the request seeks information concerning persons, not parties to this litigation, whose privacy rights are implicated. Plaintiffs complaint alleges a time period of "in or about 2004 — 2005." Plaintiffs request has no time limitation.
+
+Request No. 16. Any and all documents consisting of, referring or relating to communications between Jeffrey Epstein and including, but not limited to, letters, notes, text messages, messages on social networking sites, and e-mails.
+
+Response: Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the production request as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to produce all relevant documents regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that at the present time I cannot select, authenticate, and produce documents relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, the information sought is privileged and confidential, and inadmissible pursuant to the terms of the deferred prosecution agreement, Fed. Rule of Evidence 410 and 408, and §90.410, Ha. Stat. Further, the request is overly broad, work product, attorney-client privileged, and confidential. In addition, the request seeks information concerning persons, not parties to this litigation, whose privacy rights are implicated. Plaintiffs complaint alleges a time period of "in or about 2004 — 2005." Plaintiffs request has no time limitation.
+
+Request No. 17. Any and all documents consisting of, referring or relating to communications between Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, including, but not limited to, letters, notes, text messages, messages on social networking sites, and e-mails.
+
+Response: Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the production request as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to produce all relevant documents regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that at the present time I cannot select, authenticate, and produce documents relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, the information sought is privileged and confidential, and inadmissible pursuant to the terms of the deferred prosecution agreement, Fed. Rule of Evidence 410 and 408, and §90.410, Fla. Stat. Further, the request is overly broad, work product, attorney-client privileged, and confidential. In addition, the request seeks information concerning persons, not parties to this litigation, whose privacy rights are implicated. Plaintiff's complaint alleges a time period of "in or about 2004 — 2005." Plaintiffs request has no time limitation.
+
+Request No. 18. Any and all documents and photographs placed by Defendant at any time in the period of these requests on a social networking website, including without limitation, Facebook.com and MySpace.com.
+
+Response: Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the production request as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to produce all relevant documents regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that at the present time I cannot select, authenticate, and produce documents relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, the information sought is privileged and confidential, and inadmissible pursuant to the terms of the deferred prosecution agreement, Fed. Rule of Evidence 410 and 408, and §90.410, Fla. Stat. Further, the request is overly broad, work product, attorney-client privileged, and confidential. In addition, the request seeks information concerning persons, not parties to this litigation, whose privacy rights are implicated. Plaintiff's complaint alleges a time period of "in or about 2004 — 2005." Plaintiffs request seeks documents and photographs for a time period of January 1, 2003 until present.
+
+Request No. 19. Any and all documents reflecting or consisting of communications between Jeffrey Epstein and MC2 Models or Jean-Luc Brunel, relating or referring to females coming into the United States from other countries to pursue a career in modeling, including, but not limited to, letters, notes and emails.
+
+Response: Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the production request as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to produce all relevant documents regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that at the present time I cannot select, authenticate, and produce documents relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, the information sought is privileged and confidential, and inadmissible pursuant to the terms of the deferred prosecution agreement, Fed. Rule of Evidence 410 and 408, and §90.410, Fla. Stat. Further, the request is overly broad, work product, attorney-client privileged, and confidential. In addition, the request seeks information concerning persons, not parties to this litigation, whose privacy rights are implicated. Plaintiffs complaint alleges a time period of "in or about 2004 — 2005." In addition, the request seeks documents pertaining to females who are not non-parties, and who possess privacy rights.
+
+Request No. 20. Any and all documents referring or relating to gifts or loans to females under the age of 21, including, but not limited to, notes, receipts and car rental agreements.
+
+Response: Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the production request as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to produce all relevant documents regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that at the present time I cannot select, authenticate, and produce documents relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, the information sought is privileged and confidential, and inadmissible pursuant to the terms of the deferred prosecution agreement, Fed. Rule of Evidence 410 and 408, and §90.410, Fla. Stat. Further, the request is overly broad, work product, attorney-client privileged, and confidential. In addition, the request seeks information concerning persons, not parties to this litigation, whose privacy rights are implicated. Plaintiffs complaint alleges a time period of "in or about 2004 — 2005." Plaintiffs request has no time limitation.
+
+Request No. 21. Any and all personal calendars or schedules of or for Jeffrey Epstein from January 1, 2003 to the present.
+
+Response: Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the production request as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to produce all relevant documents regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that at the present time I cannot select, authenticate, and produce documents relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, the information sought is privileged and confidential, and inadmissible pursuant to the terms of the deferred prosecution agreement, Fed. Rule of Evidence 410 and 408, and §90.410, Fla. Stat. Further, the request is overly broad, work product, attorney-client privileged, and confidential. In addition, the request seeks information concerning persons, not parties to this litigation, whose privacy rights are implicated. Plaintiffs complaint alleges a time period of "in or about 2004 — 2005." In addition, the request encompasses attorney-client privileged material.
+
+Request No. 22. All documents written by Jeffrey Epstein consisting of personal thoughts, feelings or descriptions of events, incidents or occurrences in Defendant's life, including without limitation, any diaries of Jeffrey Epstein.
+
+Response: Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the production request as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to produce all relevant documents regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that at the present time I cannot select, authenticate, and produce documents relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, the information sought is privileged and confidential, and inadmissible pursuant to the terms of the deferred prosecution agreement, Fed. Rule of Evidence 410 and 408, and §90.410, Fla. Stat. Further, the request is overly broad, work product, attorney-client privileged, and confidential. In addition, the request seeks information concerning persons, not parties to this litigation, whose privacy rights are implicated. Plaintiffs complaint alleges a time period of "in or about 2004 - 2005." On its fact, the request goes beyond the scope of allowable discovery and is meant to harass, embarrass and overburden the Defendant. Further, the request is so overly broad that it includes attorney-client and work product privileged materials.
+
+Request No. 23. All documents referring to or relating to Jeffrey Epstein's purchase or consumption of prescription medicine.
+
+Response: Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the production request as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to produce all relevant documents regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that at the present time I cannot select, authenticate, and produce documents relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, the information sought is privileged and confidential, and inadmissible pursuant to the terms of the deferred prosecution agreement, Fed. Rule of Evidence 410 and 408, and §90.410, Fla. Stat. Further, the request is overly broad, work product, attorney-client privileged, and confidential. In addition, the request seeks information concerning persons, not parties to this litigation, whose privacy rights are implicated. Plaintiffs complaint alleges a time period of "in or about 2004 — 2005." Defendant's medical condition is not at issue in this action. Such a request is meant to harass and embarrass Defendant. Further, such information is privileged pursuant to Fed. Rule 501 and §90.503, Fla. Stat. In addition, such information is protected by the provisions of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA).
+
+**Certificate of Service**
+
+WE HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing has been sent via U.S. Mail and facsimile to the following addressees this 26th day of January, 2009.
+
+Adam D. Horowitz, Esq.  
+Jeffrey Marc Herman, Esq.  
+Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq.  
+18205 Biscayne Boulevard  
+Suite 2218  
+Miami, FL 33160  
+305-931-2200  
+Fax: 305-931-0877  
+[ahorowitz@hermanlaw.com](mailto:ahorowitz@hermanlaw.com)  
+[jherman@hermanlaw.com](mailto:jherman@hermanlaw.com)  
+[lrivera@hermanlaw.com](mailto:lrivera@hermanlaw.com)  
+*Counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe #3*
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger  
+Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.  
+250 Australian Avenue South  
+Suite 1400  
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012  
+561-659-8300  
+Fax: 561-835-8691  
+[jagesq@bellsouth.net](mailto:jagesq@bellsouth.net)  
+*Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein*
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+![]()*(Co-counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein)*
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739492/EFTA02739492.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739492/EFTA02739492.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4b4c85d696ddc6123822bee583056e69fe6271c7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739492/EFTA02739492.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,910 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739492.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 24,
+  "chars": 39617,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 6.11,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            198.61200000000002,
+            66.50200000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            406.6258544921875,
+            66.50200000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            406.6258544921875,
+            94.99102783203125
+          ],
+          [
+            198.61200000000002,
+            94.99102783203125
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE & OBJECTIONS \nTO PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            114.01799999999999,
+            270.874
+          ],
+          [
+            488.52996826171875,
+            270.874
+          ],
+          [
+            488.52996826171875,
+            302.54974365234375
+          ],
+          [
+            114.01799999999999,
+            302.54974365234375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Certificate of Service",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 23,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            241.522,
+            65.691
+          ],
+          [
+            364.73499999999996,
+            65.691
+          ],
+          [
+            364.73499999999996,
+            79.478
+          ],
+          [
+            241.522,
+            79.478
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            231
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            11
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            318
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            295
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 9,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 10,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            292
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 11,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 12,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            284
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 13,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 14,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 15,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            282
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 16,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 17,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 18,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            50
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 19,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 20,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 21,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 22,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 23,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            13
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739492"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739516/EFTA02739516.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739516/EFTA02739516.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d9bb2e35b0a09fbf1587d97835eea4f0e3b773a6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739516/EFTA02739516.md
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
+#### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+#### PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES AND PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, AND INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT
+
+Plaintiff, by and through undersigned counsel, files this Motion to Compel Answers to Interrogatories and Production of Documents, and Memorandum of Law in Support, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26 and 37 and S.D.FIa.L.R. 26.1(H)(2), as follows:
+
+## I. INTRODUCTION
+
+Plaintiff in this case propounded 17 interrogatories and 24 documents requests. In response, Defendant has produced no information and no documents. Defendant's principal objection concerns his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. Defendant, however, fails to set forth a sufficient predicate in his responses to interrogatories or documents requests for his refusal to provide any responsive documents or information. Defendant, rather, repeats in each response an all-encompassing, blanket assertion of Fifth Amendment privilege.
+
+Defendant's responses also include a laundry list of objections to Plaintiff's interrogatories and documents requests, none of which serve as a basis for a denial of all discovery. For the reasons discussed below, Plaintiff requests an order compelling Defendant to answer interrogatories and
+
+produce responsive documents.
+
+#### IL EPSTEIN'S BLANKET ASSERTION OF PRIVILEGE AGAINST SELF-INCRIMINATION IN RESPONSES TO INTERROGATORIES IS INSUFFICIENT
+
+Defendant's response to each and every one of Plaintiff's Interrogatories2 contains the following privilege objection:
+
+> I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorney has counseled me that I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution.
+
+Defendant's canned objection represents a "blanket" refusal to answer questions in this civil case. See Anglada v. Sprague,822 F.2d 1035, 1037 (11th Cir. 1987) (rejecting a "blanket" refusal to testify as unacceptable). While Plaintiff does not dispute that Defendant Epstein's Fifth Amendment privilege may be asserted in a civil case,; the Fifth Amendment's "protection must be confined to instances where the witness has reasonable cause to apprehend danger from a direct answer." Hoffman v. United States, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951) (emphasis supplied).
+
+"[A] witness has some minimal burden to justify invocation of the privilege." In re J.M.V.
+
+<sup>&#</sup>x27; This Motion addresses almost entirely general or blanket objections to discovery, which are repeated in multiple or all of the Defendant's responses to Plaintiff's discovery requests. Accordingly, Plaintiff deviates where necessary from the format set forth in S.D.Fla.L.R. 26.10-0(2) in the interests of clarity and efficiency.
+
+<sup>&#</sup>x27;Attached as Exhibit &quot;A&quot; is Defendant&#x27;s Response and Objections to Plaintiff&#x27;s Interrogatories.</p><p><sup>&#</sup>x27;This discussion addresses the Defendant&#x27;s Fifth Amendment claim of privilege. Defendant also asserts a privilege under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments. The Sixth Amendment does not provide a basis to refuse to answer questions in a civil case as a means to preserve the Defendant&#x27;s &quot;right to effective representation&quot;, as Defendant asserts in his responses. The Fourteenth Amendment likewise is inapposite, as state action is not at issue in this federal case.</p><p block-type='Text'>Inc. 90 F.R. 737, 739 (Bankr. E.D. Pa. 1988). The privilege must be asserted in response to a particular question, and in each instance &quot;[i]t is for the court to decide whether a witness&#x27; silence is justified and to require him to answer if it clearly appears to the Court that the witness asserting the privilege is mistaken as to its validity.&quot; In re Morganroth 718 F.2d 161, 166-167 (6th Cir. 1983) (holding that it was not sufficient for witness to answer every question with conclusory assertion of Fifth Amendment privilege). Accord Anglada, 822 F.2d at 1037 (noting that Court should not have to speculate as to which questions would tend to incriminate); See also Hoffman, 341 U.S. at 486 (witness&#x27; &quot;say-so does not of itself establish the hazard of self-incrimination&quot;); In re Wincek 202 B.R. 161, 168 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1996) (rejecting assertion of Fifth Amendment privilege in &quot;broad, unsupported fashion&quot;).</p><p block-type='Text'>The &quot;reasonable cause&quot; for invocation of the Fifth Amendment privilege is not self-evident from the interrogatories propounded by Plaintiff. For example, Interrogatory no. 1 asks the Defendant to identify employees who performed work or services at his Palm Beach residence. It is not apparent that identifying the chef, chauffeur, gardener, etc., would tend to incriminate the Defendant. The information sought in the bulk of the Plaintiff&#x27;s interrogatories may be categorized generally as follows:</p><table><thead><tr><th>Tyne of Information</th><th>Interrogatory No.</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>identification of persons</td><td>1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10, 17</td></tr><tr><td>identification of health care providers</td><td>8</td></tr><tr><td>telephone numbers used by Epstein</td><td>II, 12</td></tr></tbody></table><p block-type='Text'>general information based on Florida Standard Interrogatories, F1a.R.Civ.P. Form 2, nos. 7, 10, 12</p><p block-type='Text'>13. 14. l</p><p block-type='Text'>These Interrogatories, on their face, do not infringe upon or otherwise implicate the Defendant&#x27;s rights under the Fifth Amendment. It is, therefore, incumbent upon the Defendant to set forth reasonable cause for his invocation of the Fifth Amendment in response to each of these Interrogatories. Absent some interrogatory-by-interrogatory showing of reasonable cause, Plaintiff asks that Defendant&#x27;s claims of privilege under the Fifth Amendment be rejected and overruled.</p><h4>III. DEFENDANT&#x27;S BLANKET ASSERTION OF FIFTH AMENDMENT PRIVILEGE IN RESPONSE TO REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION IS INSUFFICIENT</h4><p block-type='Text'>In response to Plaintiffs Requests for Production,5 Defendant has asserted an identical, &quot;blanket&quot; objection to each and every request, as follows:</p><blockquote><p block-type='Text'>I intend to produce all relevant documents regarding this lawsuit. However, my attorneys have counseled me that at the present time I cannot select, authenticate, and produce documents relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution.</p></blockquote><p block-type='Text'>Initially, it is well established that the Fifth Amendment privilege may not apply to specific documents &quot;even though they contain incriminating assertions of fact or belief because the creation of those documents was not &#x27;compelled&#x27; within the meaning of the privilege.&quot; United States v. Hubbell 530 U.S. 27, 35-36 (2000). Accordingly, a party cannot avoid discovery merely because</p><p>Plaintiff does not challenge at this time Defendant&#x27;s assertion of a Fifth Amendment privilege in response to interrogatory no. 9, which seeks information on Defendant&#x27;s sexual aids.</p><p>s Defendant&#x27;s Response to Request for Production, which sets forth each Request and the Defendant&#x27;s Response, is attached hereto as Exhibit &quot;B&quot;.</p><p block-type='Text'>demanded documents contain incriminating evidence, &quot;whether written by others or voluntarily prepared by himself.&quot; Id.</p><p block-type='Text'>Nonetheless, the act of procuring documents may be considered testimonial and protected by the Fifth Amendment privilege in two instances: (1) if the existence and location of the documents are unknown; or (2) where production would &quot;implicitly authenticate&quot; the documents. In re Grand Jury Subpoena 1 F.3d 87, 93 (2d Cir. 1993); see also Fisher v. United States 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976) (issue expressed as whether compliance with a document request or subpoena &quot;tacitly conceded&quot; the item&#x27;s authenticity, existence or possession by the defendant). It is the Defendant&#x27;s burden to demonstrate that the act of producing any particular responsive documents would entail testimonial self-incrimination. United States v. Wujkowski,929 F.2d 981, 984 (4th Cir. 1991). It is not self-evident or apparent from the Plaintiffs requests that the act of producing responsive items would be protected under the Fifth Amendment. In particular, there is no reason to believe that production of documents in response to the following requests would compel testimonial selfincrimination:</p><h1>pes of Documents Requested Request Nos.</h1><table>
+<tbody><tr><td>Agreements with the U.S. Attorney and State Attorney, and documents exchanged between Defendant and the U.S. Attorney or State Attorney</td><td>1-4</td></tr>
+<tr>
+<td>Telephone records</td><td>5-6</td></tr>
+<tr>
+<td>Videos, photographs of residence</td><td>7</td></tr>
+<tr>
+<td>Documents relating to Plaintiff Jane Doe</td><td>8</td></tr>
+<tr>
+<td>Air travel records</td><td>10</td></tr>
+<tr>
+<td>Documents relating to modeling agencies</td><td>11</td></tr>
+</tbody></table><p block-type='Text'>Correspondence with other witnesses 14, 15, 16. 17. I9</p><p block-type='Text'>Social networking documents 18</p><p block-type='Text'>Gifts to minor females 20</p><p block-type='Text'>Personal calendars, diaries 21, 22</p><p block-type='Text'>Prescription medicines 236</p><p block-type='Text'>As to the above-listed items, it is not possession or control of these items that would prove incriminating; rather, if anything, it is their contents, which are not protected by the Fifth Amendment privilege so long as they were created voluntarily. Fisher 425 U.S. at 410; see also In re 156 B.R. 272, 177-78 (Bankr. D. Idaho 1993). Nor would production of items in response to these requests &quot;implicitly authenticate&quot; items that are themselves incriminating. See In re Grand Jury Subpoena, 1 F.3d at 93-94 (holding that defendant&#x27;s calendar/diary not protected from discovery by &quot;act of production&quot; doctrine under the Fifth Amendment).</p><p block-type='Text'>Without more, therefore, Defendant&#x27;s blanket claim of a Fifth Amendment privilege in response to all of Plaintiff&#x27;s document requests should be rejected, and responsive documents ordered to be produced.</p><h3>IV. DEFENDANT&#x27;S OBJECTION AND STATEMENT CONCERNING ADVERSE INFERENCE IS INAPPROPRIATE AND INCORRECT</h3><p block-type='Text'>Defendant makes the following self-serving and unnecessary assertion in response to each and every interrogatory and document request propounded by Plaintiff:</p><blockquote><p block-type='Text'>Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution.</p></blockquote><p><sup>&#</sup>x27;Plaintiff concedes that the act of producing items in response to request no. 9, concerning witness statements, and request nos. 12-13, concerning photographs or images of females, may implicate the Fifth Amendment.</p><p block-type='Text'>Although a defendant&#x27;s assertion of his Fifth Amendment privilege cannot be used against a criminal defendant, it is well established that &quot;an adverse inference based on a refusal to testify in a civil case is an appropriate remedy as it provides some relief to the civil litigant whose case is unfairly prejudicial by a witness&#x27; assertion of the Fifth Amendment privilege ...&quot; United States v. Custer Battles. L.L.C. 415 F. Supp. 2d 628, 632 (E.D. Va. 2006); accordBaxler v. Pahnigiano,425 U.S. 408, 318 (1976) (&quot;the Fifth Amendment does not forbid adverse inferences against parties to civil actions when they refuse to testify in response to probative evidence offered against them&quot;); Securities and Exhange Comm&#x27;n v. Graystone Nash. Inc. 25 F.3d 187, 190 (3d Cir. 1994) (&quot;[t]he [defendant&#x27;s] dilemma of choosing between complete silence and presenting a defense [in a civil case] does not fatally infect the right against compelled self-incrimination&quot;).7</p><p block-type='Text'>In any event, the issue of adverse inference, at this juncture, is premature. It is first necessary to determine whether the Fifth Amendment privilege is validly asserted in response to particular questions. This issue is typically resolved on a motion to compel. Custer Battles 415 F. Supp. 2d at 633. If it is determined that the privilege is properly asserted, then adverse inferences are admissible consistent with the Rules of Evidence, i.e., where they are relevant, reliable and not unfairly prejudicial, confusing or cumulative. Id. at 634. Such evidentiary issues concerning adverse inference are appropriately addressed at the time of summary judgment or trial. It is inappropriate and unnecessary to challenge the use of adverse inferences through self-serving statements in blanket objections to interrogatories.</p><h4>V. PLAINTIFF IS ENTITLED TO DEFENDANT&#x27;S HEALTH CARE INFORMATION IN DISCOVERY</h4><p><sup>&#</sup>x27;Moreover, a defendant in a civil case may not manipulate his use of the Fifth Amendment privilege by shielding himself from inquiries during discovery, and then submitting surprise testimony in a summary judgment affidavit or at trial. Id. at 191.</p><h1>A. Interrogatory at Issue</h1><p block-type='Text'>&quot;Interrogatory No.8. Identify all of Jeffrey Epstein&#x27;s health care providers in the past (10) ten years, including without limitation, psychologists, psychiatrists, mental health counselors, physician, hospital and treatment facilities.&quot;</p><h2>B. Pertinent Portion of Defendant&#x27;s Objection</h2><p block-type='Text'>&quot;... [s]uch information is privileged pursuant to Rule 501, Fed.Evid., and §90.503, Fla.Evd. Code. In addition, such information is protected by the provision of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA).&quot;</p><h2>C. Grounds for Objection and Reasons for Motion</h2><p block-type='Text'>The substantive basis for Defendant&#x27;s objection is a claim of privilege under state law, Florida Statute §90.503 (psychotherapist-patient privilege) and federal law, HIPAA, 42 U.S.C. §1320d et seq. Neither of these privilege claims are a basis to withhold relevant health care information in this case. Initially, Florida Statute §90.503 does not protect as privileged the identity of health care providers, which is all that is sought in Plaintiffs interrogatory. Rather, it protects &quot;confidential communications&quot; with a psychotherapist. Florida Statute §90.503(2). Further, Plaintiff is ultimately entitled to discovery from the Defendant&#x27;s psychotherapists because §90.503 does not apply to relevant documents in a case of child abuse under Florida Statute §39.204. This Statute abrogates the psychotherapist-patient privilege in cases involving child abuse:</p><blockquote><p block-type='Text'>Abrogation of privileged communications in cases involving child abuse, abandonment, or neglect.- the privileged quality of communication . . . between any professional person and his or her patient or client, and any other privileged communication except that between attorney and client or the privilege provided ins. 90.505, as such communication relates both to the competency of the witness and to the exclusion of confidential communications, shall not apply</p></blockquote><p block-type='Text'>to any communication involving the perpetrator or alleged perpetrator in any situation involving known or suspected child abuse....</p><p block-type='Text'>(Emphasis supplied).8 &quot;With the exceptions of the attorney-client privilege and the clergy communications privilege, section 39.204 abrogates the various evidentiary privileges in cases involving child abuse, abandonment or neglect.&quot; Nussbaumer v. State, 882 So.2d 1067 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004). It represents a determination by the legislature that discovery of facts relating to claims of child abuse is more important than the protection of otherwise confidential psychotherapistpatient communications:</p><blockquote><p block-type='Text'>Obviously, the psychotherapist privilege provided by section 90.503(2) is intended to encourage people who need treatment for mental disorders (including child abusers) to obtain it by insuring the confidentiality of communication during treatment. We must assume, however, that the legislature, in passing [§39.204) weighed the desirability of encouraging treatment for child abusers against the desirability of discovering them and decided that the latter was more important than the former. The intent of [§39.204] is to discourage child abuse. That discouragement, in view of the statutory language, can occur by way of a civil lawsuit for damages as well as by way of a criminal prosecution.</p></blockquote><p block-type='Text'>garsori v. l, 466 So.2d 1188, 1190 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985) (analyzing predecessor statute, §4 I 5.512, Fla. Stat.).</p><p block-type='Text'>Defendant also asserts HIPAA, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, 42 U.S.C. §1320d et seq. as a ground for objection to Plaintiff&#x27;s interrogatory. &quot;HIPAA does not create substantive rights that act as a bar on discovery. . . . HIPAA regulations is (sic) purely procedural in nature and does not create a federal physician-patient or hospital-patient privilege.&quot;</p><p>The term &quot;child abuse&quot; is defined broadly in the Statute to encompass the acts and conduct alleged against Epstein in this case. A &quot;child&quot; is a person under the age of 18, and &quot;abuse&quot; means &quot;any willful or threatened act that results in any physical, mental, or sexual injury or harm that causes or is likely to cause the child&#x27;s physical, mental or emotional health to be significantly impaired.&quot;</p><p block-type='Text'>v. Woodford, 2007 WL 309485 \*11 (E.D. Cal. 2007). Under HIPAA, health care information may be disclosed in discovery under a qualified protective order, which prohibits using or disclosing protected health care information for any purpose other than the litigation and requires return or destruction of the protected health care information. 45 C.F.R. §164.512(i)(e). Accordingly, there is no basis to withhold from discovery Epstein&#x27;s health care information, particularly as it relates to Plaintiff&#x27;s allegations of child abuse.</p><h4>VI. OTHER OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF&#x27;S DISCOVERY REOUESTS ARE MERITLESS</h4><h2>A. Overbroad; Relevance</h2><p block-type='Text'>In response to each and every interrogatory propounded by Plaintiff, Defendant asserts in blanket and conclusory fashion that it is &quot;overbroad and seeks information that is neither relevant to the subject matter of the pending action nor dies it appear reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.&quot; Defendant also objects to each and every document request as overbroad. These objections are groundless. Plaintiff&#x27;s discovery requests fall within the scope of broad discovery and relevance under Fed.R.Civ.P. 26. All of Plaintiff&#x27;s interrogatories and document requests are sufficiently narrow and tailored for Defendant to reasonably provide substantive responses. Defendant fails to indicate unfair prejudice or undue burden from any interrogatory or document request. Defendant provides no responsive information whatsoever, nor has he made any suggestion to reasonably narrow or limit any of the Plaintiff&#x27;s discovery requests.</p><p block-type='Text'>Defendant complains that the time period covered in the interrogatories is too broad. The stated time period, applicable to Plaintiff&#x27;s interrogatories and documents requests generally, as noted in Defendant&#x27;s responses, is January I, 2003 to present. This time frame is sufficiently</p><p>Florida Statutes §39.201.</p><p block-type='Text'>narrow, especially since the plan and scheme alleged in the Complaint to lure girls to the Defendant&#x27;s Palm Beach mansion for &quot;massages&quot; has been in place since at least that date. Defendant&#x27;s overbroad/relevance objections should, accordingly, be overruled.</p><h2>B. Work Product; AttorneyClient Privilege</h2><p block-type='Text'>In response to various interrogatories and all of the documents requests, Defendant asserts in conclusory fashion objections based on the attorney work product and attorney-client communication privilege.9 In making these privilege claims, Defendant failed to provide a privilege log as required by S.D.Fla.L.R. 26.1(G)(3). These interrogatories and mg uests generally do not on their face implicate the work product or attorney client privileges.10 These privilege claims should therefore be rejected and overruled.</p><h2>C. Plaintiff&#x27;s Definitions of &quot;Employee&quot; is Reasonable</h2><p block-type='Text'>Defendant contests the definition of &quot;Employee&quot; in Plaintiff&#x27;s document requests and interrogatories, which states as follows:</p><p block-type='ListGroup'><ul><li block-type='ListItem'>g. &quot;Employee&quot; shall mean any person employed to perform work for services for Defendant or by Defendant, either directly or indirectly, including without limitation:</li><li block-type='ListItem'>i. a limited partnership, corporation, limited liability company, or other company or entity in which Defendant is a member, director, officer or person in control; and</li><li block-type='ListItem'>ii. persons employed by a partnership or a subsidiary of a partnership in which Defendant is a general partner or person in control.</li></ul></p><p><sup>&#</sup>x27;These privileges are asserted in response to Interrogatory nos. 13, 14, and 17, and each and every document request.</p><p><sup>&#</sup>x27;The only possible exception would be Plaintiffs Document Request no. 9, which seeks witness statements; nonetheless, Defendant is required to comply with the Local Rule and provide a privilege log in response to this request as well as the others.</p><p block-type='Text'>The term &quot;Employee&quot; appears in Interrogatory nos. 1, 2, and Document Request no. 6. The breadth of this definition is reasonable under the circumstances of this case. Upon information and belief, Defendant Epstein conducted his business and personal affairs through a labyrinth of corporate entities and other business forms. This definition of &quot;Employee&quot; is reasonable to encompass responsive information and documents.</p><h4>D. Fed.R.Civ.P. 408 and 410 Do Not Create a Privilege in Discovery</h4><p block-type='Text'>Defendant objects to Document Request nos. 1-5, which seek the Defendant&#x27;s agreements with the U.S. Attorney and State Attorney, and documents exchanged with their offices, on the grounds of Fed.R.Evid. 408 and 410. These Rules cover the admissibility in evidence of compromises and plea agreements; they do not set forth a privilege applicable to such agreements in discovery. To the extent a protective order with regard to such documents is deemed appropriate, Plaintiffs counsel agrees to limit their use to this litigation, and not to disclose documents responsive to these requests to third parties.</p><h4>E. Third Path PliNIICN Rights</h4><p block-type='Text'>Defendant broadly and vaguely asserts third party privacy rights in response to various document requests. To the extent that any such privacy rights are properly raised in this case, Plaintiff consents to the entry of an appropriate protective order under which such documents will not be disseminated to third parties and will be used only for purposes of this litigation.</p><h4>VII. Conclusion</h4><p block-type='Text' class='has-continuation'>Based on the foregoing, Plaintiff respectfully requests that Defendant&#x27;s assertions of privilege and objections be denied and overruled, and that an Order be entered directing Defendant to answer the Plaintiff&#x27;s Interrogatories and produce documents responsive to Plaintiffs Requests</p><p block-type='Text'>for Production, subject to such protective order as may be necessary and appropriate. Plaintiff further requests such other relief as this Court deems just and proper.</p><p block-type='Text'>Dated: March 2, 2009</p><p block-type='Text'>Respectfully submitted,</p><p block-type='Text'>By: s/ Adam D. Horowitz Stuart S. Mermelstein (FL Bar No. 947245) ssm@sexabuseattorney.com Adam D. Horowitz (FL Bar No. 376980) ahorowitz@sexabuseattorney.com MERMELSTEIN &amp; HOROWITZ, P.A. A►torneys <b>for Plaintiff </b> 18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160 Tel: 305-931-2200 Fax: 305-931-0877</p><h3>CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO S.D.FLA.L.R. 7.1(A)(3)</h3><p block-type='Text'>Counsel for Plaintiff has made reasonable efforts to confer with counsel for Defendant, by letter dated February 25, 2009, seeking in good faith to resolve or narrow the issues raised in the Motion, but Defendant&#x27;s counsel failed to respond to Plaintiff&#x27;s letter, and Plaintiff&#x27;s counsel has been unable to resolve this dispute.</p><p block-type='Text'>s/ Adam D. Horowitz</p><h3>CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE</h3><p block-type='Text'>I hereby certify that on March 2, 2009, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day to all parties on the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those parties who are not authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing.</p><p block-type='Text'>/s/ Adam D. Horowitz</p><h4>SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida</h4><p block-type='Text'>Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. igoldberger@agwpa.com</p><p block-type='Text'>Robert D. Critton, Esq. rcritton@bc1claw.com</p><p block-type='Text'>/s/ Adam D. Horowitz</p>
+ </body>
+ </html></sup>
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739516/EFTA02739516.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739516/EFTA02739516.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5f5cb45c59977f548bf1cddf80392fe688dec0d3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739516/EFTA02739516.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,1171 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739516.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 16,
+  "chars": 26575,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 2.83,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            86.67
+          ],
+          [
+            405.95098876953125,
+            86.67
+          ],
+          [
+            405.95098876953125,
+            115.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            115.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL ANSWERS TO \nINTERROGATORIES AND PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, \nAND INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            127.29599999999999,
+            295.65
+          ],
+          [
+            484.94183349609375,
+            295.65
+          ],
+          [
+            484.94183349609375,
+            338.9830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            127.29599999999999,
+            338.9830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "I. INTRODUCTION",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            237.45600000000002,
+            435.7800000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            374.9649658203125,
+            435.7800000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            374.9649658203125,
+            451.10302734375
+          ],
+          [
+            237.45600000000002,
+            451.10302734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "IL EPSTEIN'S BLANKET ASSERTION OF PRIVILEGE \nAGAINST SELF-INCRIMINATION IN RESPONSES \nTO INTERROGATORIES IS INSUFFICIENT",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            141.984,
+            113.4
+          ],
+          [
+            469.930908203125,
+            113.4
+          ],
+          [
+            469.930908203125,
+            157.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            141.984,
+            157.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "III. DEFENDANT'S BLANKET ASSERTION OF \nFIFTH AMENDMENT PRIVILEGE IN RESPONSE \nTO REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION IS INSUFFICIENT",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            166.46400000000003,
+            281.07
+          ],
+          [
+            477.415771484375,
+            281.07
+          ],
+          [
+            477.415771484375,
+            325.1030578613281
+          ],
+          [
+            166.46400000000003,
+            325.1030578613281
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "pes of Documents Requested Request Nos.",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            105.26399999999998,
+            476.28
+          ],
+          [
+            465.865234375,
+            476.28
+          ],
+          [
+            465.865234375,
+            492.7330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            105.26399999999998,
+            492.7330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            392.29200000000003,
+            476.28
+          ],
+          [
+            463.284,
+            476.28
+          ],
+          [
+            463.284,
+            490.86
+          ],
+          [
+            392.29200000000003,
+            490.86
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "IV. DEFENDANT'S OBJECTION AND STATEMENT CONCERNING \nADVERSE INFERENCE IS INAPPROPRIATE AND INCORRECT",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            108.32399999999998,
+            504.63
+          ],
+          [
+            503.70599365234375,
+            504.63
+          ],
+          [
+            503.70599365234375,
+            534.7330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            108.32399999999998,
+            534.7330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "V. PLAINTIFF IS ENTITLED TO DEFENDANT'S \nHEALTH CARE INFORMATION IN DISCOVERY",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            159.732,
+            617.22
+          ],
+          [
+            462.77203369140625,
+            617.22
+          ],
+          [
+            462.77203369140625,
+            646.4830169677734
+          ],
+          [
+            159.732,
+            646.4830169677734
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "A. Interrogatory at Issue",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            229.5,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            383.7051086425781,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            383.7051086425781,
+            101.9830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            229.5,
+            101.9830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "B. Pertinent Portion of Defendant's Objection",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            174.42,
+            197.64
+          ],
+          [
+            437.5975036621094,
+            197.64
+          ],
+          [
+            437.5975036621094,
+            213.363037109375
+          ],
+          [
+            174.42,
+            213.363037109375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "C. Grounds for Objection and Reasons for Motion",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            164.01600000000002,
+            310.23
+          ],
+          [
+            448.3669128417969,
+            310.23
+          ],
+          [
+            448.3669128417969,
+            325.4830627441406
+          ],
+          [
+            164.01600000000002,
+            325.4830627441406
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "VI. OTHER OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF'S \nDISCOVERY REOUESTS ARE MERITLESS",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 9,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            174.42,
+            253.53000000000003
+          ],
+          [
+            447.69781494140625,
+            253.53000000000003
+          ],
+          [
+            447.69781494140625,
+            283.1030578613281
+          ],
+          [
+            174.42,
+            283.1030578613281
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "A. Overbroad; Relevance",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 9,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            227.052,
+            295.65
+          ],
+          [
+            385.5632629394531,
+            295.65
+          ],
+          [
+            385.5632629394531,
+            311.2330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            227.052,
+            311.2330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "B. Work Product; AttorneyClient Privilege",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 10,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            179.928,
+            169.29
+          ],
+          [
+            433.2805480957031,
+            169.29
+          ],
+          [
+            433.2805480957031,
+            184.93353271484375
+          ],
+          [
+            179.928,
+            184.93353271484375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "C. Plaintiff's Definitions of \"Employee\" is Reasonable",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 10,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            155.448,
+            365.31000000000006
+          ],
+          [
+            458.3191223144531,
+            365.31000000000006
+          ],
+          [
+            458.3191223144531,
+            380.68353271484375
+          ],
+          [
+            155.448,
+            380.68353271484375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "D. Fed.R.Civ.P. 408 and 410 Do Not \nCreate a Privilege in Discovery",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 11,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            200.73600000000002,
+            225.99000000000004
+          ],
+          [
+            411.00579833984375,
+            225.99000000000004
+          ],
+          [
+            411.00579833984375,
+            254.9830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            200.73600000000002,
+            254.9830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "E. Third Path PliNIICN Rights",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 11,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            215.42399999999998,
+            464.12999999999994
+          ],
+          [
+            397.7896728515625,
+            464.12999999999994
+          ],
+          [
+            397.7896728515625,
+            478.863037109375
+          ],
+          [
+            215.42399999999998,
+            478.863037109375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "VII. Conclusion",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 11,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            257.03999999999996,
+            604.26
+          ],
+          [
+            355.7822570800781,
+            604.26
+          ],
+          [
+            355.7822570800781,
+            618.7330169677734
+          ],
+          [
+            257.03999999999996,
+            618.7330169677734
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO S.D.FLA.L.R. 7.1(A)(3)",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 13,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            156.06,
+            86.67
+          ],
+          [
+            456.2237548828125,
+            86.67
+          ],
+          [
+            456.2237548828125,
+            101.60302734375
+          ],
+          [
+            156.06,
+            101.60302734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 14,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            227.052,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            385.0019836425781,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            385.0019836425781,
+            100.863037109375
+          ],
+          [
+            227.052,
+            100.863037109375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "SERVICE LIST \nDOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN \nUnited States District Court, Southern District of Florida",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 15,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            156.67200000000003,
+            85.05
+          ],
+          [
+            455.6081237792969,
+            85.05
+          ],
+          [
+            455.6081237792969,
+            128.947021484375
+          ],
+          [
+            156.67200000000003,
+            128.947021484375
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            71
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            32
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            67
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Table",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            65
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            32
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            73
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            33
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Table",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            61
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            9
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            59
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            60
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            72
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            33
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 9,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            52
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 10,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            60
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            29
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 11,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 12,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            36
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            18
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 13,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            17
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            9
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 14,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            20
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 15,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            21
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            11
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739516"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739532/EFTA02739532.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739532/EFTA02739532.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f99cb8dfd514faa3151140bd9357a4a71d827a8e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739532/EFTA02739532.md
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
+### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+v.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+### DEFENDANT's MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
+
+Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, (hereinafter "Epstein") by and through his undersigned attorneys, respectfully moves this Court for an extension of time in which to respond to Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint dated February 27, 2009. Local General Rule 7.1 A.1 and Rule 6, Fed. R. Civ. P. (2009). Defendant seeks an extension until April 3, 2009, to file his response. As good cause in support of granting the motion, Defendant states:
+
+- 1. Defendant's response to the Second Amended Complaint would be due on March 11, 2009 (10 days to respond, not including weekend).
+- 2. Plaintiff's counsel also represents five (5) other Plaintiffs pursuing claims against Defendant, EPSTEIN. All Plaintiffs have also filed amended complaints bearing the same dates. In order to fully and adequately respond to this and the other complaints, Defendant is in need of an extension until April 3, 2009.
+  - 3. In addition to the multiple amended complaints, good cause for the extension
+
+Jane Doe No. 3 v. Epstein Page 2
+
+also includes that counsel has been attempting to resolve discovery issues in this and other cases against Defendant, EPSTEIN; an associate of Defendant's undersigned counsel who works extensively on this case was out of the office for two weeks during the month February caring for two of her children who had the flu, and the associate herself also caught the flu; Defendant's counsel is also in the midst of preparing for two state court trials — one on a March trial docket and the other specially set in mid-May, (OLD MARSH GOLF CLUB, INC. v. OLD MARSH PARTNERS, et al, Case No. 50 2006CA001667)OO((MBAD - set on trial docket beginning March 16, 2009; CARDIOPULMONARY & PRIMARY CARE ASSOC. OF TREASURE COAST, P.A v. M.D., Case No. 562008CA001726, specially set for trial beginning May 13 through 15, 2009). Discovery in both of these cases is ongoing with several depositions set to prepare for trial.
+
+4. The requested extension is fair in reasonable under the circumstances as it will provide time to allow the Defendant, EPSTEIN, to fully and adequately respond to this and the other amended complaints. In addition, this action is still at its early stages.
+
+5. As certified below, counsel for Defendant conferred with counsel for Plaintiff, and Plaintiffs counsel is in agreement with the requested extension.
+
+WHEREFORE, Defendant requests that this Court enter an order granting an Defendant an extension until April 3, 2009, in which to respond to the Second Amended Complaint.
+
+# Local Rule 7.1 Statement
+
+Counsel for the movant conferred by telephone with counsel for the Plaintiff and
+
+Jane Doe No. 3 v. Epstein  
+Page 3
+
+Counsel for Plaintiff is in agreement with the requested extension until April 3, 2009 for Defendant to respond to the Second Amended Complaint.
+
+![]()**Certificate of Service**
+
+I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record identified on the following Service List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on this 4th day of March, 2009:
+
+Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq.  
+Adam D. Horowitz, Esq.  
+Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A.  
+18205 Biscayne Boulevard  
+Suite 2218  
+Miami, FL 33160  
+305-931-2200  
+Fax: 305-931-0877  
+[ssm@sexabuseattorney.com](mailto:ssm@sexabuseattorney.com)  
+[ahorowitz@sexabuseattorney.com](mailto:ahorowitz@sexabuseattorney.com)  
+Counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe #3
+
+![]()![]()![]()
+
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+v.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
+
+This matter came before the Court on Defendant's, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Motion For Extension of Time In Which to Respond to Second Amended Complaint. Having considered Defendant's motion and Plaintiffs counsel being in agreement with the requested extension, it is HEREBY ORDERED and ADJUDGED that:
+
+Defendant's motion is GRANTED. Defendant shall respond to the Second Amended Complaint on or before April 3, 2009.
+
+DONE and ORDERED this day of , 2009.
+
+Kenneth A. Marra United States District Judge
+
+Courtesy Copies: Counsel of Record
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739532/EFTA02739532.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739532/EFTA02739532.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5aac29a38caa3bbe77d7e7352d34797c790117d9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739532/EFTA02739532.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,315 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739532.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 4,
+  "chars": 4557,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 4.57,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            198.288,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            406.7753601074219,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            406.7753601074219,
+            114.54998779296875
+          ],
+          [
+            198.288,
+            114.54998779296875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "DEFENDANT's MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO RESPOND TO \nPLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            93.024,
+            307.3074951171875
+          ],
+          [
+            512.3768920898438,
+            307.3074951171875
+          ],
+          [
+            512.3768920898438,
+            334.6800231933594
+          ],
+          [
+            93.024,
+            334.6800231933594
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Local Rule 7.1 Statement",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            233.784,
+            657.72
+          ],
+          [
+            370.8767395019531,
+            657.72
+          ],
+          [
+            370.8767395019531,
+            673.3000030517578
+          ],
+          [
+            233.784,
+            673.3000030517578
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Certificate of Service",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            262.548,
+            217.07999999999998
+          ],
+          [
+            375.76800000000003,
+            217.07999999999998
+          ],
+          [
+            375.76800000000003,
+            230.03999999999996
+          ],
+          [
+            262.548,
+            230.03999999999996
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            198.89999999999998,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            407.5253601074219,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            407.5253601074219,
+            114.91998291015625
+          ],
+          [
+            198.89999999999998,
+            114.91998291015625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO \nRESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            81.396,
+            307.79999999999995
+          ],
+          [
+            524.788818359375,
+            307.79999999999995
+          ],
+          [
+            524.788818359375,
+            336.91998291015625
+          ],
+          [
+            81.396,
+            336.91998291015625
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            49
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            17
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            45
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            23
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739532"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739536/EFTA02739536.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739536/EFTA02739536.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4d4fc0c622b2b57c8e53201388dd195a5a65f0db
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739536/EFTA02739536.md
@@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA I
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff, v.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+### DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES AND PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS
+
+Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, (hereinafter "Epstein") by and through his undersigned attorneys, respectfully moves this Court for an extension of time in which to respond to Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Answers to Interrogatories And Production of Documents, dated March 2, 2009. Local General Rule 7.1 A.1 and Rule 6, Fed. R. Civ. P. (2009). Defendant seeks an extension until March 25, 2009, to file his response. As good cause in support of granting the motion, Defendant states:
+
+1. Defendant's response to the motion to compel would be due on March 16, 2009 (10 days to respond, not including weekends). As certified below, Plaintiff's counsel is in agreement with the requested extension of March 25, 2009.
+
+2. Plaintiffs counsel also represents other Plaintiffs pursuing claims against Defendant, EPSTEIN. A total of four of the Plaintiffs have also filed motions to compel bearing the same dates. In order to fully and adequately respond to this and the other motions, Defendant is in need of an extension until March 25, 2009.
+
+Jane Doe No. 3 v. Epstein Page 2
+
+3. In addition to the multiple motions to compel, good cause for the extension also includes that counsel has been attempting to resolve discovery issues in this and other cases against Defendant, EPSTEIN; an associate of Defendant's undersigned counsel who works extensively on this case was out of the office for two weeks during the month February caring for two of her children who had the flu, and the associate herself also caught the flu; Defendant's counsel is also in the midst of preparing for two state court trials — one on a March trial docket and the other specially set in mid-May, (OLD MARSH GOLF CLUB, INC. v. OLD MARSH PARTNERS, et al, Case No. 50 2006CA001667XXXXMBAD — set on trial docket beginning March 16, 2009; CARDIOPULMONARY & PRIMARY CARE ASSOC. OF TREASURE COAST, P.A v. , M.D., Case No. 562008CA001726, specially set for trial beginning May 13 through 15, 2009). Discovery in both of these cases is ongoing with several depositions set to prepare for trial.
+
+4. The requested extension is fair in reasonable under the circumstances as it will provide time to allow the Defendant, EPSTEIN, to fully and adequately respond to this and the other motions to compel.
+
+WHEREFORE, Defendant requests that this Court enter an order granting the Defendant an extension until March 25, 2009, in which to respond to Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Answers to Interrogatories and Production of documents.
+
+# Local Rule 7.1 Certification
+
+Counsel for the movant conferred by telephone with counsel for the Plaintiff and Counsel for Plaintiff is in agreement with the requested extension until March 25, 2009
+
+Jane Doe No. 3 v. Epstein  
+Page 3
+
+for Defendant to respond to the motion to compel.
+
+![]()**Certificate of Service**
+
+I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record identified on the following Service List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on this 08 day of March, 2009:
+
+Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq.  
+Adam D. Horowitz, Esq.  
+Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A.  
+18205 Biscayne Boulevard  
+Suite 2218  
+Miami, FL 33160  
+305-931-2200  
+Fax: 305-931-0877  
+[ssm@sexabuseattorney.com](mailto:ssm@sexabuseattorney.com)  
+[ahorowitz@sexabuseattorney.com](mailto:ahorowitz@sexabuseattorney.com)  
+Counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe #3
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger  
+Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.  
+250 Australian Avenue South  
+Suite 1400  
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012  
+561-659-8300  
+Fax: 561-835-8691  
+[jagesq@bellsouth.net](mailto:jagesq@bellsouth.net)  
+*Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein*
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+![]()
+
+# UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff, v.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES AND PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS
+
+This matter came before the Court on Defendant's, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Motion For Extension of Time in Which to Respond to Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Answers to Interrogatories and Production of Documents. Having considered Defendant's motion and Plaintiffs counsel being in agreement with the requested extension, it is HEREBY ORDERED and ADJUDGED that:
+
+Defendant's motion is GRANTED. Defendant shall respond to Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Answers to Interrogatories and Production of Documents on or before March 25, 2009.
+
+DONE and ORDERED this day of , 2009.
+
+Kenneth A. Marra United States District Judge
+
+Courtesy Copies: Counsel of Record
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739536/EFTA02739536.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739536/EFTA02739536.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..001a3cdeebca58d0e4bad11313fef076e74a6d40
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739536/EFTA02739536.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,307 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739536.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 4,
+  "chars": 5042,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 4.83,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            199.67999267578125,
+            83.7974853515625
+          ],
+          [
+            407.592,
+            83.7974853515625
+          ],
+          [
+            407.592,
+            112.27996826171875
+          ],
+          [
+            199.67999267578125,
+            112.27996826171875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO RESPOND \nTO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES \nAND PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            102.12999725341797,
+            305.0474548339844
+          ],
+          [
+            503.676,
+            305.0474548339844
+          ],
+          [
+            503.676,
+            345.1600036621094
+          ],
+          [
+            102.12999725341797,
+            345.1600036621094
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Local Rule 7.1 Certification",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            230.11199999999997,
+            630.1800000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            377.8240661621094,
+            630.1800000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            377.8240661621094,
+            645.1800079345703
+          ],
+          [
+            230.11199999999997,
+            645.1800079345703
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Certificate of Service",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            264.384,
+            202.5
+          ],
+          [
+            377.604,
+            202.5
+          ],
+          [
+            377.604,
+            215.46000000000004
+          ],
+          [
+            264.384,
+            215.46000000000004
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            201.16998291015625,
+            85.05
+          ],
+          [
+            407.8999938964844,
+            85.05
+          ],
+          [
+            407.8999938964844,
+            114.16998291015625
+          ],
+          [
+            201.16998291015625,
+            114.16998291015625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO \nRESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL ANSWERS TO \nINTERROGATORIES AND PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            83.23200000000001,
+            307.79999999999995
+          ],
+          [
+            525.538818359375,
+            307.79999999999995
+          ],
+          [
+            525.538818359375,
+            350.41998291015625
+          ],
+          [
+            83.23200000000001,
+            350.41998291015625
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            17
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            49
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739536"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739540/EFTA02739540.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739540/EFTA02739540.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cee7ae28dcc9c080a059620c5315370a699de10a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739540/EFTA02739540.md
@@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
+### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+v.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+### DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITATION IN RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES AND PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, INCLUDING SUPPORTING MEMORANDUM OF LAW
+
+Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, by and through his undersigned counsel, moves to exceed the page limitation of 20 pages imposed by Loc. Gen. Rule 7.1. C. 2. (S.D. Fla.), in his supporting memorandum of law in response to Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Answers to Interrogatories and Production of Documents, and Incorporated Memorandum of Law In Support, dated March 2, 2009. In support of his motion, Defendant states:
+
+- 1. This motion is being filed in an abundance of caution.
+- 2. Local Gen. Rule 7.1 C. 2. provides in part that "absent prior permission of the court, no party shall file any legal memorandum exceeding twenty pages in length." Defendant is in the process of preparing his Response and Incorporated Memorandum of Law to Plaintiffs Motion to Compel, dated March 2, 2009, (and due by an extension to March 25, 2009). Although the memorandum of law incorporated into the response
+
+Jane Doe No. 3 v. Epstein Page 2
+
+Will be less than 20 pages, it is likely that the entire response, including the memorandum, will be in excess of 20 pages.
+
+3. A length exceeding 20 pages is required so that Defendant may fully address the issues raised in Plaintiffs motion to compel which are directed to Defendant's answers to interrogatories and Defendant's response to Plaintiff's production request. Plaintiff served 23 interrogatories and 25 production requests to which Defendant raised individualized constitutional guarantees and additional objections. In order to present Defendant's response in an organized and understandable manner, the 20 page limitation is required to be exceeded.
+
+WHEREFORE, Defendant respectfully requests that this Court grant Defendant's motion, and enter an order allowing a response, including memorandum of law, which is in excess of 20 pages.
+
+# Rule 7.1 Certification
+
+Pursuant to communication by telephone, Plainti s counsel has ti objection to the request to exceed 20 pages herein.
+
+Rob D. Critto Jr. Attorney for Eps ein
+
+# Certificate of Service
+
+I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of recordalitified slay folio .ng Service List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on this `67;Eiay of 2009:
+
+Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq.
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
+
+Jane Doe No. 3 v. Epstein  
+Page 3
+
+Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A.  
+18205 Biscayne Boulevard  
+Suite 2218  
+Miami, FL 33160  
+305-931-2200  
+Fax: 305-931-0877  
+[ssm@sexabuseattorney.com](mailto:ssm@sexabuseattorney.com)  
+[ahorowitz@sexabuseattorney.com](mailto:ahorowitz@sexabuseattorney.com)  
+Counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe #3
+
+250 Australian Avenue South  
+Suite 1400  
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012  
+561-659-8300  
+Fax: 561-835-8691  
+[jagesq@bellsouth.net](mailto:jagesq@bellsouth.net)  
+*Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein*
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+![]()
+
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRAI I
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+v.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+#### ORDER ON DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITATION IN RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES AND PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, INCLUDING SUPPORTING MEMORANDUM OF LAW
+
+This matter came before the Court on Defendant's, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Motion to Exceed Page Limitation in Response to Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Answers to Interrogatories and Production of Documents, Including Supporting Memorandum of Law. Having considered Defendant's motion and Plaintiff's counsel being in agreement with the request to exceed page limitation, it is HEREBY ORDERED and ADJUDGED that:
+
+Defendant's motion is GRANTED. Defendant's Response to Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Answers to Interrogatories and Production of Documents, Including Supporting Memorandum of Law may exceed 20 pages.
+
+DONE and ORDERED this day of , 2009.
+
+Kenneth A. Marra United States District Judge
+
+Courtesy Copies: Counsel of Record
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739540/EFTA02739540.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739540/EFTA02739540.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..938997f3f88bba3d1acce61412c8d016b445715f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739540/EFTA02739540.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,311 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739540.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 4,
+  "chars": 4420,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 3.43,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            197.676,
+            85.3074951171875
+          ],
+          [
+            404.8999938964844,
+            85.3074951171875
+          ],
+          [
+            404.8999938964844,
+            113.79998779296875
+          ],
+          [
+            197.676,
+            113.79998779296875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITATION IN \nRESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL ANSWERS TO \nINTERROGATORIES AND PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, \nINCLUDING SUPPORTING MEMORANDUM OF LAW",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            105.26399999999998,
+            306.99
+          ],
+          [
+            499.1349182128906,
+            306.99
+          ],
+          [
+            499.1349182128906,
+            363.91998291015625
+          ],
+          [
+            105.26399999999998,
+            363.91998291015625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Rule 7.1 Certification",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            239.29200000000003,
+            436.59000000000003
+          ],
+          [
+            363.4833679199219,
+            436.59000000000003
+          ],
+          [
+            363.4833679199219,
+            451.28997802734375
+          ],
+          [
+            239.29200000000003,
+            451.28997802734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Certificate of Service",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            256.428,
+            575.0574951171875
+          ],
+          [
+            381.37005615234375,
+            575.0574951171875
+          ],
+          [
+            381.37005615234375,
+            589.6699981689453
+          ],
+          [
+            256.428,
+            589.6699981689453
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            201.55999755859375,
+            85.2974853515625
+          ],
+          [
+            408.20400000000006,
+            85.2974853515625
+          ],
+          [
+            408.20400000000006,
+            114.15997314453125
+          ],
+          [
+            201.55999755859375,
+            114.15997314453125
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "ORDER ON DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITATION IN \nRESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES AND \nPRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, \nINCLUDING SUPPORTING MEMORANDUM OF LAW",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            62.34999465942383,
+            306.9274597167969
+          ],
+          [
+            546.516,
+            306.9274597167969
+          ],
+          [
+            546.516,
+            359.77996826171875
+          ],
+          [
+            62.34999465942383,
+            359.77996826171875
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            60
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            30
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            9
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            22
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739540"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739544/EFTA02739544.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739544/EFTA02739544.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d2565e25197e7870a9828be12c48e255f4c908c8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739544/EFTA02739544.md
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+## AFFIDAVIT OF JACK A. GOLDBERGER, ESQUIRE
+
+STATE OF FLORIDA ) SS COUNTY OF PALM BEACH )
+
+BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, personally appeared having personal knowledge and being duly sworn, deposes and says:
+
+1. I, Jack A. Goldberger, have personal knowledge of the matters set forth herein. I am an attorney licensed to practice in the State of Florida since 1978. I am a partner with the law firm of Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A., located at One Clearlake Centre, Suite 1400, 250 Australian Avenue South, West Palm Beach, FL 33401.
+
+2. My practice includes and specializes in the defense of criminal matters. I am board certified in criminal law. I have been and currently am the criminal defense attorney for JEFFREY EPSTEIN.
+
+3. I represented Mr. EPSTEIN in the negotiation of and entering into a Non-Prosecution Agreement with the United States Attorney's Office (USAO) for the Federal Southern District of Florida. The terms and conditions of the Non-Prosecution Agreement also entailed the entering of a Plea Agreement with the State Attorney's Office, Palm Beach County, State of Florida. (The Non-Prosecution Agreement shall hereinafter be referred to as the "NPA").
+
+4. By its terms, the NPA took effect on June 30, 2008. Also, pursuant to the terms of the NPA, any criminal prosecution against EPSTEIN is deferred as long as the terms and conditions of the NPA are fulfilled by EPSTEIN.
+
+> it EXHIBIT tl
+
+5. The criminal matters against EPSTEIN remain ongoing until the NPA expires by its terms in late 2010 and as long as the USAO determines EPSTEIN has complied with those terms and conditions. The threat of criminal prosecution against EPSTEIN by USAO in the Southern District of Florida continues presently and through late 2010.
+
+6. Pursuant to the terms of the NPA, the USAO possesses the right to declare that the agreement has been breached, give EPSTEIN's counsel notice, and attempt to move forward with aprosecution. As of the date of this Affidavit, the USAO has taken the position on a number of occasions that it might consider the following actions by EPSTEIN to be a breach of the NPA.
+
+- Investigation by EPSTEIN (by and through his attorneys) of this Plaintiff and the other Plaintiffs in other pending civil cases for purposes of defending the civil actions;
+- EPSTEIN's contesting damages in this action and other civil actions.
+- EPSTEIN or his legal representatives making statements to the press about this Plaintiff or the other Plaintiffs.
+- Using the word "jail" instead of "imprisonment" in the plea agreement with the Palm Beach County State Attorney's Office.
+
+7. EPSTEIN, through counsel, submitted a Freedom of Information Act request to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) for documents relating to this and the other cases; the FBI denied the request stating the materials are at this time exempt from disclosure because they are in an investigative file, i.e. the matter is still an ongoing criminal investigation.
+
+8. The NPA expires in late 2010.
+
+FURTHER THE AFFIANT SAYETH NAUGHT
+
+![]()STATE OF FLORIDA  
+COUNTY OF PALM BEACH
+
+I hereby Certify that on this day, before me, an officer duly authorized to administer oaths and take acknowledgments, personally appeared Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire, known to me to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing Affidavit, who acknowledged before me that he/she executed the same, that I relied upon the following form of identification of the above named person: Awarn Personally, and that an oath was/was not taken.
+
+WITNESS my hand and official seal in the County and State last aforesaid this 19th day of February, 2009.
+
+(SEARCHED INDEXED SERIALIZED FILED)
+
+![](_page_2_Picture_110.jpeg)
+
+![]()PRINT NAME: KUE ROSIN  
+NOTARY PUBLIC/STATE OF FLORIDA  
+COMMISSION NO.: DD 489790  
+MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: 11/13/2009
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739544/EFTA02739544.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739544/EFTA02739544.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b88d7913b0c561fd7abb2a4f99d6b1969517cd86
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739544/EFTA02739544.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,172 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739544.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 3,
+  "chars": 3841,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 4.34,
+  "image_assets": [
+    "_page_2_Picture_110.jpeg"
+  ],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "AFFIDAVIT OF JACK A. GOLDBERGER, ESQUIRE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            151.776,
+            81.0
+          ],
+          [
+            441.3828430175781,
+            81.0
+          ],
+          [
+            441.3828430175781,
+            95.79998779296875
+          ],
+          [
+            151.776,
+            95.79998779296875
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            49
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            300
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            65
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            15
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "Picture",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739544"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739544/_page_2_Picture_110.jpeg b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739544/_page_2_Picture_110.jpeg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..65cbb52acd35a43c509bb2eead62c6a9427cf5a3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739544/_page_2_Picture_110.jpeg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:f9bd471c31bc9c2e9c5703d15a930f7d1c67d647765f85dc3d3088a260c3d6a7
+size 9871
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739547/EFTA02739547.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739547/EFTA02739547.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9a9a9c30c917c0abe876000170fcf7514709e374
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739547/EFTA02739547.md
@@ -0,0 +1,122 @@
+#### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRALEM
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
+
+Plaintiff, Jane Doe No.3 ("Jane" or "Jane Doe"), brings this Complaint against Jeffrey Epstein, as follows:
+
+# Parties, Jurisdiction and Venue
+
+- 1. Jane Doe is a citizen and resident of the State of Florida, and is sui juris.
+- 2. This Complaint is brought under a fictitious name to protect the identity of the Plaintiff because this Complaint makes sensitive allegations of sexual assault and abuse upon her when she was a minor.
+  - 3. Defendant Jeffrey Epstein is a citizen and resident of the State of New York.
+  - 4. This is an action for damages in excess of \$50 million.
+- 5. This Court has jurisdiction of this action and the claims set forth herein pursuant to <sup>28</sup> U.S.C. §1332(a), as the matter in controversy (i) exceeds \$75,000, exclusive of interest and costs; and (ii) is between citizens of different states.
+- 6. This Court has venue of this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1391(a) as a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred in this District.
+
+- - fc EXHIBIT
+
+#### Factual Allezations
+
+7. At all relevant times, Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") was an adult male, <sup>52</sup> years old. Epstein is afinancier and money manager with asecret clientele limited exclusively to billionaires. He is himself <sup>a</sup>man of tremendous wealth, power and influence. He maintains his principal home in New York and also owns residences in New Mexico, St. =and Palm Beach, FL. The allegations herein concern Epstein's conduct while at his lavish estate in Palm Beach.
+
+8. Upon information and belief, Epstein has asexual preference and obsession for underage minor girls. He engaged in <sup>a</sup>plan and scheme in which he gained access to primarily economically disadvantaged minor girls in his home, sexually assaulted these girls, and then gave them money. In or about 2004-2005, Jane Doe, then 16 years old, fell into Epstein's trap and became one of his victims.
+
+9. Upon information and belief, Jeffrey Epstein carried out his scheme and assaulted <sup>g</sup>irls in Florida, New York and on his private island, known as Little St. James, in St.
+
+10. An integral player in Epstein's Florida scheme was aPalm Beach Community College student from Loxahatchee, Florida. She recruited girls ostensibly to give <sup>a</sup> wealthy man <sup>a</sup>massage for monetary compensation in his Palm Beach mansion. Under Epstein's <sup>p</sup>lan, would be contacted when Epstein was planning to be at his Palm Beach residence or soon after he had arrived there. Epstein or someone on his behalf directed to bring one or more underage girls to the residence. MEI upon information and belief, generally sought out economically disadvantaged underage girls from Loxahatchee and surrounding areas who would be enticed by the money being offered - generally \$200 to \$300 per "massage" session - and who were perceived as less likely to complain to authorities or have credibility if allegations of improper conduct were made. This was an important element of Epstein's plan.
+
+11. Epstein's plan and scheme reflected aparticular pattern and method. Upon arrival at Epstein's mansion, the victim would be brought to the kitchen. She would then be led up aflight of stairs to a bedroom that contained <sup>a</sup>massage table in addition to other furnishings. Once the girl was alone in this room, Epstein would enter wearing only a towel to cover his private area. He then would lay down on the massage table and perform one or more lewd, lascivious and sexual acts, including masturbation and touching the girl sexually.
+
+12. Consistent with the foregoing plan and scheme, recruited Jane Doe to <sup>g</sup>ive Epstein <sup>a</sup>massage for monetary compensation. Ea brought Jane to Epstein's mansion in Palm Beach. Jane was led up the flight of stairs to the room with the massage table. She was alone in the room when Epstein arrived wearing a towel to cover his private parts. He laid down on the massage table, and sexually assaulted Jane Doe during the massage. In addition, Jeffrey Epstein masturbated during the massage.
+
+13. After Epstein had completed the assault, he left the room. Jane was then able to leave the room and go back down the stairs. She then meta again who brought Jane home. Jane was paid \$200 by Epstein. IMEMI was also paid by Epstein for bringing Jane to him.
+
+14. As a result of this encounter with Epstein, the 16-year old Jane experienced trauma, shock, confusion, shame, humiliation and embarrassment.
+
+#### COUNT I Sexual Assault and Battery
+
+- 15. PlaintiffJane Doe repeats and realleges paragraphs 1 through 14 above.
+- 16. Epstein acted with intent to cause an offensive contact with Jane Doe, or an imminent apprehension of such a contact, and Jane Doe was thereby put in such imminent apprehension.
+  - 17. Epstein made an intentional, unlawful offer of offensive sexual contact toward Jane
+
+Doe, creating a reasonable fear of imminent peril.
+
+18. Epstein intentionally inflicted harmful or offensive contact on the person of Jane Doe, with the intent to cause such contact or the apprehension that such contact is imminent.
+
+19. Epstein tortiously committed asexual assault and battery on Jane Doe. Epstein's acts were intentional, unlawful, offensive and harmful.
+
+20. Epstein's plan and scheme in which he committed such acts upon Jane Doe were done willfully and maliciously.
+
+21. As a direct and proximate result of Epstein's assault on Jane, she has suffered and will continue to suffer severe and permanent traumatic injuries, including mental, psychological and emotional damages.
+
+WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 3 demands judgment against Defendant Jeffrey Epstein for compensatory damages, punitive damages, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper.
+
+#### COUNT II Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress
+
+22. Plaintiff Jane Doe repeats and realleges paragraphs 1 through 14 above.
+
+23. Epstein's conduct was intentional or reckless.
+
+24. Epstein's conduct with aminor was extreme and outrageous, going beyond all bounds of decency.
+
+25. Epstein committed willful acts of child sexual abuse on Jane Doe. These acts resulted in mental or sexual injury to Jane Doe, that caused or were likely to cause Jane Doe's mental or emotional health to be significantly impaired.
+
+26. Epstein's conduct caused severe emotional distress to Jane Doe. Epstein knew or had
+
+reason to know that his intentional and outrageous conduct would cause emotional distress and damage to Jane Doe, or Epstein acted with reckless disregard of the high probability of causing severe emotional distress to Jane Doe.
+
+27. As a direct and proximate result of Epstein's intentional or reckless conduct, Jane Doe, has suffered and will continue to suffer severe mental anguish and pain.
+
+WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 3 demands judgment against Defendant Jeffrey Epstein for compensatory damages, costs, punitive damages, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper.
+
+### COUNT III Coercion and Enticement to Sexual Activity in Violation of 18 U.S.C. <sup>42422</sup>
+
+28. Plaintiff Jane Doe repeats and realleges paragraphs 1 through 14 above.
+
+29. Epstein used afacility or means of interstate commerce to knowingly persuade, induce or entice Jane Doe, when she was under the age of 18 years, to engage in prostitution or sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense.
+
+30. On June 30, 2008, Epstein entered aplea of guilty to violations of Florida §§ 796.07 and 796.03, in the 15th Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County (Case nos. 2008-cf-<sup>00938</sup>1 AXXXMB and 2006-cf-009454AXXXMB), for conduct involving the same plan and scheme as alleged herein.
+
+31. As to Plaintiff lane Doe, Epstein could have been charged with criminal violations of Florida Statute §796.07(2) (including subsections (c), (d), (e), (f), (g), and (h) thereof), and other criminal offenses including violations of Florida Statutes §§ 798.02 and 800.04 (including subsections (5), (6) and (7) thereof).
+
+32. Epstein's acts and conduct are in violation of 18 U.S.C. §2422.
+
+33. As a result of Epstein's violation of 18 U.S.C. §2422, Plaintiff has suffered personal injury, including mental, psychological and emotional damages.
+
+34. Plaintiff hired Herman & Mermelstein, P.A., in this matter and agreed to pay them <sup>a</sup> reasonable attorneys' fee.
+
+WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 3 demands judgment against Defendant Jeffrey Epstein for all damages available under 18 U.S.C. §2255(a), including without limitation, actual and compensatory damages, costs of suit, and attorneys' fees, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper.
+
+#### JURY TRIAL DEMAND
+
+Plaintiff demands ajury trial in this action on all claims so triable.
+
+Dated: February 27, 2009
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+By: s/ Adam D. Horowitz Stuart S. Mennelstein (FL Bar No. 947245) ssm(ii)sexabuseattoniev.com Adam D. Horowitz (FL Bar No. 376980) ahorowitzQsexabuseattomey.com MERMELSTEIN & HOROWITZ, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiff 18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160 Tel: 305-931-2200 Fax: 305-931-0877
+
+#### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
+
+I hereby certify that on February 27, 2009, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day to all parties on the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those parties who are not authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing.
+
+/s/ Adam D. Horowitz
+
+#### SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. igoldberger(angwpa.corn
+
+Robert D. Critton, Esq. rcritton(belclaw.com
+
+/s/ Adam D. Horowitz
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739547/EFTA02739547.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739547/EFTA02739547.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3ff3c78ee93002880589abca6e6d747e802b7bd0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739547/EFTA02739547.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,575 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739547.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 8,
+  "chars": 10131,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.57,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            203.18400000000003,
+            98.82
+          ],
+          [
+            393.24993896484375,
+            98.82
+          ],
+          [
+            393.24993896484375,
+            127.2457275390625
+          ],
+          [
+            203.18400000000003,
+            127.2457275390625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            203.18400000000003,
+            295.65
+          ],
+          [
+            390.90692138671875,
+            295.65
+          ],
+          [
+            390.90692138671875,
+            311.85
+          ],
+          [
+            203.18400000000003,
+            311.85
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Parties, Jurisdiction and Venue",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            217.26,
+            372.6
+          ],
+          [
+            376.5627746582031,
+            372.6
+          ],
+          [
+            376.5627746582031,
+            390.02337646484375
+          ],
+          [
+            217.26,
+            390.02337646484375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Factual Allezations",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            252.11679077148438,
+            98.82
+          ],
+          [
+            348.84,
+            98.82
+          ],
+          [
+            348.84,
+            112.59
+          ],
+          [
+            252.11679077148438,
+            112.59
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "COUNT I \nSexual Assault and Battery",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            228.276,
+            545.94
+          ],
+          [
+            364.0903625488281,
+            545.94
+          ],
+          [
+            364.0903625488281,
+            573.6939697265625
+          ],
+          [
+            228.276,
+            573.6939697265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "COUNT II \nIntentional Infliction of Emotional Distress",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            195.228,
+            439.83000000000004
+          ],
+          [
+            406.1605529785156,
+            439.83000000000004
+          ],
+          [
+            406.1605529785156,
+            467.37
+          ],
+          [
+            195.228,
+            467.37
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "COUNT III \nCoercion and Enticement to Sexual Activity in Violation of 18 U.S.C. 42422",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            113.83200000000001,
+            310.23
+          ],
+          [
+            477.97200000000004,
+            310.23
+          ],
+          [
+            477.97200000000004,
+            340.2
+          ],
+          [
+            113.83200000000001,
+            340.2
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "JURY TRIAL DEMAND",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            236.232,
+            310.23
+          ],
+          [
+            364.57232666015625,
+            310.23
+          ],
+          [
+            364.57232666015625,
+            324.2286682128906
+          ],
+          [
+            236.232,
+            324.2286682128906
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            224.45999145507812,
+            100.27166748046875
+          ],
+          [
+            371.48400000000004,
+            100.27166748046875
+          ],
+          [
+            371.48400000000004,
+            113.4
+          ],
+          [
+            224.45999145507812,
+            113.4
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "SERVICE LIST \nDOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN \nUnited States District Court, Southern District of Florida",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            161.4499969482422,
+            98.82
+          ],
+          [
+            440.02799999999996,
+            98.82
+          ],
+          [
+            440.02799999999996,
+            140.94
+          ],
+          [
+            161.4499969482422,
+            140.94
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            252
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            29
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            390
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            378
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            295
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            11
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            328
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            207
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            21
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            11
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            24
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739547"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739555/EFTA02739555.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739555/EFTA02739555.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e57258820352f306cc3255bb7f84a6c12ad6f55e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739555/EFTA02739555.md
@@ -0,0 +1,232 @@
+7
+
+IN THE COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH  
+JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM  
+BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
+
+A.C.,
+
+CASE NO. 502008CA025129XXXXMB AI
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+v.
+
+JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, and [REDACTED]  
+[REDACTED]
+
+Defendants.
+
+ORDER ON DEFENDANT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE &  
+OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION,  
+DATED FEBRUARY 6, 2009
+
+THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's  
+Response & Objections To Plaintiff's First Request For Production, dated  
+February 6, 2009 and the Court having heard argument of counsel and being  
+fully advised in these premises, it is hereby
+
+*Objections are*
+
+ORDERED and ADJUDGED that Defendant's ~~Motion is hereby granted~~
+
+~~denied~~ sustained.
+
+\_\_\_\_\_  
+\_\_\_\_\_
+
+DONE AND ORDERED at Palm Beach County Courthouse, West Palm  
+Beach, Florida, this 23 day of Feb, 2009.
+
+![]()Copies furnished:
+
+ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ., and MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ., 515 North Flagler Drive, Suite 400, West Palm Beach,  
+FL 33401; JACK SCAROLA, ESQ., AND JACK P. [REDACTED], ESQ., Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart &  
+Shipley, P.A., 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West Palm Beach, FL 33409, and JACK A.  
+GOLDBERGER, ESQ., Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A., One Clearlake Centre, Suite 1400, 250  
+Australian Avenue South, West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+
+COMPOSITE EXHIBIT "C"
+
+*CC JENA D!*
+
+IN THE COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH  
+JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM  
+BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
+
+A.C.,
+
+CASE NO. 502008CA025129XXXXMB AI
+
+Plaintiff,  
+v.
+
+JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, and [REDACTED]  
+[REDACTED]
+
+Defendants.
+
+\_\_\_\_\_/
+
+**DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S AMENDED RESPONSE &  
+OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION**
+
+Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, by and through his undersigned attorneys,  
+hereby files his Amended Response and Objections to Plaintiff's First Request For  
+Production To Defendant, served January 5, 2009 and states:
+
+**Introduction**
+
+This Amended Response amends Defendant's previously filed Response and  
+Objections to Plaintiff's First Request for Production, dated February 6, 2009. This  
+response does not change the legal objections previously raised but rather sets forth a  
+discussion of the law in support of Defendant's constitutional objections to production, in  
+particular, the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. Except for the  
+discussion of law set forth herein, this response sets forth the identical responses and  
+objections previously filed and served. Accordingly, Plaintiff is in no way prejudiced by  
+this Amended Response.
+
+**Legal Basis Applicable to Each of Defendant's Objections Set Forth Below**
+
+In response to each of the items requested, set forth below, Defendant asserts  
+his Fifth Amendment Privilege against self-incrimination. The Fifth Amendment
+
+*cc: JEFREY EPSTEIN*
+
+Privilege extends to the act of production where, as here, it involves a self-incriminating testimonial communication or "a compelled testimonial aspect." United States v. Hubbell <sup>530</sup>U.S. 27, 120 S.Ct. 2037 (2000); Fisher v. United States <sup>425</sup>U.S. <sup>391</sup> (1976); McCormick on Evidence, Title 6, Chap. 13. The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination, §138 (6th Ed.). See also Malloy v. Hogan <sup>84</sup>S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment - "[i]t would be incongruous to have different standards determine the validity of a claim of privilege based on the same feared prosecution, depending on whether the claim was asserted in state or federal court."); Hoffman v. U.S. <sup>71</sup>S.Ct. 814, 818 (1951), and progeny).
+
+The Fifth Amendment Privilege may be invoked in a civil action where alitigant or witness is being asked to provide information or respond to aquestion that may incriminate him in a crime. See generally DeLisi v. Bankers Ins. Company, <sup>436</sup>So.2d <sup>1099</sup>(Fla. 4<sup>m</sup> DCA 1983). The privilege against self-incrimination may be asserted during discovery when a litigant has "reasonable grounds to believe that the response would furnish a link in the chain of evidence needed to prove a crime against a litigant." <sup>A</sup>witness, including a civil defendant, is entitled to invoke the Fifth Amendment privilege whenever there is a realistic possibility that the answer to aquestion could be used in anyway to convict the witness of a crime or could aid in the development of other incriminating evidence that can be used at trial. Id- Pillsbury Company v. Conbov <sup>495</sup> U.S. 248, 103 S.Ct. 608 (1983).
+
+The United States Supreme Court has made clear that the scope of the Fifth Amendment Privilege includes the circumstances as here "the act of producing documents in response to a subpoena (or production request) has a compelled testimonial aspect." United States v. Hubbell, 530 U.S. 27, 36, 120 S.Ct. 2037, 2043 (2000). In explaining the application of the privilege, the Supreme Court stated:
+
+We have held that "the act of production" itself may implicitly communicate "statements of fact." By "producing documents in compliance with a subpoena, the witness would admit that the papers existed, were in his possession or control, and were authentic."<sup>FN19</sup> Moreover, as was true in this case, when the custodian of documents responds to a subpoena, he may be compelled to take the witness stand and answer questions designed to determine whether he has produced everything demanded by the subpoena.<sup>FN20</sup> The answers to those questions, as well as the act of production itself, may certainly communicate information about the existence, custody, and authenticity of the documents. Whether the constitutional privilege protects the answers to such questions, or protects the act of production itself, is a question that is distinct from the question whether the unprotected contents of the documents themselves are incriminating.
+
+<sup>FN19</sup> "The issue presented in those cases was whether the act of producing subpoenaed documents, not itself the making of a statement, might nonetheless have some protected testimonial aspects. The Court concluded that the act of production could constitute protected testimonial communication because it might entail implicit statements of fact: by producing documents in compliance with a subpoena, the witness would admit that the papers existed, were in his possession or control, and were authentic. United States v. Doe, 465 U.S., at 613, and n. 11, 104 S.Ct. 1237; Fisher, 425 U.S., at 409-410, 96 S.Ct. 1569; id. at 428, 432, 96 S.Ct. 1569 (concurring opinions). See Braswell v. United States, [487 U.S.] at 104, 108 S.Ct. 2284; [id.] at 122, 108 S.Ct. 2284 (dissenting opinion). Thus, the Court made clear that the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination applies to acts that imply assertions of fact."... An examination of the Court's application of these principles in other cases indicates the Court's recognition that, in order to be testimonial, an accused's communication must itself, explicitly or implicitly, relate a factual assertion or disclose information. Only then is a person compelled to be a 'witness' against himself." Doe v. United States, 487 U.S., at 209-210, 108 S.Ct. 2341 (footnote omitted).
+
+> FN20. See App. 62-70. Thus for example, after respondent had been duly sworn by the grand jury the prosecutor called his attention to paragraph A of the SubpoenaRider (reproduced in the Appendix, infra, at 2048-2049) and asked whether he had produced "all those documents." App. 65.
+
+Finally, the phrase "in any criminal case" in the text of the Fifth Amendment might have been read to limit its coverage to compelled testimony that is used against the defendant in the trial itself. It has, however, long been settled that its protection encompasses compelled statements that lead to the discovery of incriminating evidence even though the statements themselves are not incriminating and are not introduced into evidence. Thus, a half century ago we held that a trial judge had erroneously rejected a defendant's claim of privilege on the ground that his answer to the pending question would not itself constitute evidence of the charged offense. As we explained:
+
+"The privilege afforded not only extends to answers that would in themselves support a conviction under a federal criminal statute but likewise embraces those which would furnish a link in the chain of evidence needed to prosecute the claimant for a federal crime." Hoffman v. United States, 341 U.S. 479, 486, 71 S.Ct. 814, 95 L.Ed. 1118 (1951).
+
+Compelled testimony that communicates information that may "lead to incriminating evidence" is privileged even if the information itself is not inculpatory. Doe v. United States, 487 U.S. 201, 208, n. 6, 108 S.Ct. 2341, 101 L.Ed.2d 184 (19881. It's the Fifth Amendment's protection against the prosecutor's use of incriminating information derived directly or indirectly from the compelled testimony of the respondent that is of primary relevance in this case.
+
+In summarizing its holding regarding the application of the Fifth Amendment Privilege to a production request, the Hubbell Court left "no doubt that the constitutional privilege against self incrimination protects" not only "the target of a grand jury investigation from being compelled to answer questions designed to elicit information about the existence of sources of potentially incriminating evidence," but the privilege also "has the same application to the testimonial aspect of a response to a subpoena seeking discovery of those sources." At 43, and 2047.
+
+EPSTEIN entered into a Non-Prosecution Agreement ("NPA") with United States Attorney General's Officer ("USAO") for the Federal Southern District of Florida. The terms and conditions of the NPA also entailed EPSTEIN entering into a Plea Agreement with the State Attorney's Office, Palm Beach County, State of Florida. By its terms, the NPA took effect on June 30, 2008. As well, pursuant to the NPA, any criminal prosecution against EPSTEIN is deferred as long as the terms and conditions of the NPA are fulfilled by EPSTEIN. Criminal matters against EPSTEIN remain ongoing until the NPA expires by its terms in late 2010 and as long as the USAO determines that EPSTEIN has complied with those terms and conditions. The threat of criminal prosecution against EPSTEIN by the USAO continues presently and through late 2010. The USAO possesses the right to declare that the agreement has been breached, give EPSTEIN's counsel notice, and attempt to move forward with the prosecution. See attached Exhibit "A", Affidavit of Jack A. Goldberger, a board certified criminal defense attorney who has in the past and is currently representing EPSTEIN.
+
+This is precisely the situation that the protection of the Fifth Amendment Privilege is to apply. By responding to the request as opposed to asserting his constitutional privilege, EPSTEIN would admit that the documents/items existed, were in his possession or control, and were authentic. The act of production itself, may certainly communicate information about the existence, custody, and authenticity of the documents/items. "Whether the constitutional privilege protects the answers to such questions, or protects the act of production itself, is aquestion that is distinct from the
+
+question whether the unprotected contents of the documents themselves are incriminating." United States v. Hubbell supra.
+
+Given the type of documents requested (set forth below), the collection and production of the of the items demanded would be "tantamount to answering a series of interrogatories asking a witness to disclose the existence and location of particular documents/[items] fitting certain broad descriptions." Hubbell supra at 41-2, and 2046. Responding to the requests is "the functional equivalent of the preparation of an answer to either a detailed written interrogatory or a series of oral questions at a discovery deposition." Id. As stated in Hubbell, "it is undeniable that providing a catalog of existing documents (items)" fitting within any of the requested documents "could provide a prosecutor with a 'lead to incriminating evidence,' or 'a link in the chain of evidence needed to prosecute.-
+
+Accordingly, Defendant's constitutional objection is required to be upheld.
+
+## Specific Requests & Responses. Including Objections
+
+Request No. 1: Any and all evidence required to be maintained by Epstein and the United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, specifically evidence requested by or directly related to the grand jury subpoenas that have been issued in connection with the investigation referenced in the Non-Prosecution Agreement, and including certain computer equipment.
+
+Response: Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the production request as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to produce all relevant documents regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that at the
+
+Page 7
+
+present time I cannot select, authenticate, and produce documents relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, the information sought is privileged and confidential, and inadmissible pursuant to the terms of the deferred prosecution agreement, Fed. Rule of Evidence 410 and 408, and §90.410, Fla. Stat. Further, the request may include information subject to work product or an attorney-client privilege.
+
+Request No. 2: Any and all documents reflecting or relating to the identity of, the scheduling of, and/or the payment of any female compensated by or on behalf of Epstein for providing any service to Epstein that required, contemplated, or included in the provisions of such service, any physical contact between Epstein and the female, any act or prostitution, any illicit sexual conduct, the exposure of breast, buttocks or genitalia, or any commercial sex act as defined in 18 U.S.C. §1591(c)(1).
+
+Response: Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the production request as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to produce all relevant documents regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that at the present time I cannot select, authenticate, and produce documents relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to
+
+effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, the information sought is privileged and confidential, and inadmissible pursuant to the terms of the deferred prosecution agreement, Fed. Rule of Evidence 410 and 408, and §90.410, Fla. Stat. Further Defendants objects to the production as overly broad and seeking information that is neither relevant to the subject matter of the pending action nor does it appear to be reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. The Plaintiff in this instance has alleged in her complaint that she was sexually abused by the Defendant on one occasion sometime in the year 2004. The documents requested herein have no time period provided, and therefore the information sought is grossly overbroad.
+
+Request No. 3: Any and all documents reflecting or relating to the identity of and/or the nature and extent of any other person's participation in the communication with and/or the scheduling of and/or the payment of any person who participated in any conduct described in Request #2.
+
+Response: Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the production request as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to produce all relevant documents regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that at the
+
+present time I cannot select, authenticate, and produce documents relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, the information sought is privileged and confidential, and inadmissible pursuant to the terms of the deferred prosecution agreement, Fed. Rule of Evidence 410 and 408, and §90.410, Fla. Stat. Further Defendants objects to the production as overly broad and seeking information that is neither relevant to the subject matter of the pending action nor does it appear to be reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. The Plaintiff in this instance has alleged in her complaint that she was sexually abused by the Defendant on one occasion sometime in the year 2004. The documents requested herein have no time period provided, and therefore the information sought is grossly overbroad.
+
+### Certificate of Service
+
+/94)C aem/f I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was sent by/6.S. Mail the following addressees on this 19th day of February , 2009: to
+
+Jack Scarola, Esq.
+
+Jack Pt Esq.
+
+Searcy Denney Scarola Shipley, P.A
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq.
+
+Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
+
+Barnhart & 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400
+
+2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd.  
+West Palm Beach, FL 33409  
+561-686-6300 Phone  
+561-383-9424 Fax  
+*Counsel for Plaintiff*
+
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012  
+561-659-8300  
+Fax: 561-835-8691  
+[jagesq@bellsouth.net](mailto:jagesq@bellsouth.net)  
+*Counsel for Defendants Jeffrey Epstein*  
+and [REDACTED]
+
+**BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER  
+& COLEMAN, LLP**
+
+515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400  
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401  
+(561) 842-2820  
+(561) 515-3148 Fax
+
+By:
+
+![]()*(Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey E. Epstein)*
+
+*Counsel Copy: Judge Barrett*
+
+## AFFIDAVIT OF JACK A. GOLDBERGER, ESQUIRE
+
+STATE OF FLORIDA ) SS COUNTY OF PALM BEACH )
+
+BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, personally appeared having personal knowledge and being duly sworn, deposes and says:
+
+1. I, Jack A. Goldberger, have personal knowledge of the matters set forth herein. I am an attorney licensed to practice in the State of Florida since 1978. I am a partner with the law firm of Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A., located at One Clearlake Centre, Suite 1400, 250 Australian Avenue South, West Palm Beach, FL 33401.
+
+2. My practice includes and specializes in the defense of criminal matters. I am board certified in criminal law. I have been and currently am the criminal defense attorney for JEFFREY EPSTEIN.
+
+3. I represented Mr. EPSTEIN in the negotiation of and entering into a Non-Prosecution Agreement with the United States Attorney's Office (USAO) for the Federal Southern District of Florida. The terms and conditions of the Non-Prosecution Agreement also entailed the entering of a Plea Agreement with the State Attorney's Office, Palm Beach County, State of Florida. (The Non-Prosecution Agreement shall hereinafter be referred to as the "NPA").
+
+4. By its terms, the NPA took effect on June 30, 2008. Also, pursuant to the terms of the NPA, any criminal prosecution against EPSTEIN is deferred as long as the terms and conditions of the NPA are fulfilled by EPSTEIN.
+
+EXHIBIT.
+
+5. The criminal matters against EPSTEIN remain ongoing until the NPA expires by its terms in late 2010, and as long as the USAO determines EPSTEIN has complied with those terms and conditions. The threat of criminal prosecution against EPSTEIN by USAO in the Southern District of Florida continues presently and through late 2010.
+
+6. Pursuant to the terms of the NPA, the USAO possesses the right to declare that the agreement has been breached, give EPSTEIN's counsel notice, and attempt to move forward with a prosecution. As of the date of this Affidavit, the USAO has taken the position on a number of occasions that it might consider the following actions by EPSTEIN to be a breach of the NPA.
+
+- Investigation by EPSTEIN (by and through his attorneys) of this Plaintiff and the other Plaintiffs in other pending civil cases for purposes of defending the civil actions;
+- EPSTEIN's contesting damages in this action and other civil actions
+- EPSTEIN or his legal representatives making statements to the press about this Plaintiff or the other Plaintiffs.
+- Using the word "jail" instead of "imprisonment" in the plea agreement with the Palm Beach County State Attorney's Office.
+
+7. EPSTEIN, through counsel, submitted a Freedom of Information Act request to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) for documents relating to this and the other cases; the FBI denied the request stating the materials are at this time exempt from disclosure because they are in an investigative file, i.e. the matter is still an ongoing criminal investigation.
+
+8. The NPA expires in late 2010.
+
+FURTHER THE AFFIANT SAYETH NAUGHT
+
+Jack A. Goldberger, Esq.
+
+STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PALM BEACH
+
+I hereby Certify that on this day, before me, an officer duly authorized to administer oaths and take acknowledgments, personally appeared Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire, known to me to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing Affidavit, who acknowledged before me that he/she executed the same, that I relied upon the/following form of identification of the above named person: kivowl , and that an oath was/was not taken.
+
+win,4Ess my hand and official seal in the County and State last aforesaid this v-I day of IC( 6, 14 • , 2009.
+
+![](_page_13_Picture_7.jpeg)
+
+)E . ) f-4-1- E- 16-\511,-) NOTARY PU LIC/STA F FLORIDA PRINT NA II COMMISSION NO.: bb L1 8`t- 2`F O MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: 0 1(3 h. 01
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739555/EFTA02739555.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739555/EFTA02739555.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..03ed04eec4ed40655f4f6d13e3834995a88cf949
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739555/EFTA02739555.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,684 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739555.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 14,
+  "chars": 22639,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 10.91,
+  "image_assets": [
+    "_page_13_Picture_7.jpeg"
+  ],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "ORDER ON DEFENDANT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE & OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION, DATED FEBRUARY 6, 2009",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            96.084,
+            282.68999999999994
+          ],
+          [
+            490.212,
+            282.68999999999994
+          ],
+          [
+            490.212,
+            325.62
+          ],
+          [
+            96.084,
+            325.62
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S AMENDED RESPONSE & OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            105.26399999999998,
+            268.11
+          ],
+          [
+            495.72,
+            268.11
+          ],
+          [
+            495.72,
+            299.70000000000005
+          ],
+          [
+            105.26399999999998,
+            299.70000000000005
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Introduction",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            264.996,
+            392.84999999999997
+          ],
+          [
+            333.54,
+            392.84999999999997
+          ],
+          [
+            333.54,
+            406.62
+          ],
+          [
+            264.996,
+            406.62
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Legal Basis Applicable to Each of Defendant's Objections Set Forth Below",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            100.98000000000002,
+            635.85
+          ],
+          [
+            495.72,
+            635.85
+          ],
+          [
+            495.72,
+            652.0500000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            100.98000000000002,
+            652.0500000000001
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Specific Requests & Responses. Including Objections",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            159.12,
+            462.51
+          ],
+          [
+            447.9667663574219,
+            462.51
+          ],
+          [
+            447.9667663574219,
+            477.54998779296875
+          ],
+          [
+            159.12,
+            477.54998779296875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Certificate of Service",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 9,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            257.03999999999996,
+            570.177490234375
+          ],
+          [
+            381.37005615234375,
+            570.177490234375
+          ],
+          [
+            381.37005615234375,
+            584.8199999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            257.03999999999996,
+            584.8199999999999
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "AFFIDAVIT OF JACK A. GOLDBERGER, ESQUIRE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 11,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            155.448,
+            77.4375
+          ],
+          [
+            446.641845703125,
+            77.4375
+          ],
+          [
+            446.641845703125,
+            92.34
+          ],
+          [
+            155.448,
+            92.34
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            242
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            38
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            29
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "Caption",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            237
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            29
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            23
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            339
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            77
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            37
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            316
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            57
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 9,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            69
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            35
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            9
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 10,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            17
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 11,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            47
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 12,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 13,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            62
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            24
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Picture",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739555"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739555/_page_13_Picture_7.jpeg b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739555/_page_13_Picture_7.jpeg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..51e8bc67ab381c7f4ea511997d15048d2979d666
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739555/_page_13_Picture_7.jpeg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:629067498b04c79416711c48ebe0dff95e0a4dcbce28493e3ce47efc054767cc
+size 10860
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739569/EFTA02739569.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739569/EFTA02739569.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ed9fdc8dff28cca2bc8ccd45f482246267810891
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739569/EFTA02739569.md
@@ -0,0 +1,401 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA I
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff, v.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES, and RESPONSES TO 1st and <sup>2</sup> nd PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, AND INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW
+
+Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, by and through his undersigned counsel, serves his response and supporting memorandum of law to Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Answers to Interrogatories and Production of Documents, and Incorporated Memorandum of Law In Support, dated March 2, 2009. In support of Defendant's assertion of constitutional privileges and objections to discovery and in response to Plaintiffs motion to compel, Defendant states:
+
+## Introduction
+
+As discussed more fully herein, Defendant has asserted constitutional based protections to the discovery requests propounded by Plaintiff. In addition and in alternative to the constitutional protections afforded under the Fifth, Fourteenth and Sixth Amendments, Defendant also asserted other factual/legal objections and privileges. However, as will be evident in reviewing Plaintiffs discovery requests and Defendant's response, the constitutional assertions are required to be determined first so that Defendant does not risk rendering these protections meaningless in attempting
+
+to assert and argue the factual basis for the additional objections and privileges. See part II.A. herein.
+
+I. Defendant EPSTEIN has properly asserted his constitutional claims of privilege and effective assistance of counsel, as guaranteed under the Fifths Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution, to each of the specified interrogatories and production requests.
+
+In accordance with applicable law, EPSTEIN has properly asserted his claims of privilege and effective assistance of counsel as guaranteed by the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution to each of the interrogatories propounded by Plaintiff in her first set of Interrogatories and first production request. See Exhibit A to Plaintiffs Motion to Compel for Defendant's Response and Objections to Plaintiffs Amended Interrogatories, and Exhibit B to Plaintiffs motion for production requests and Defendant's responses thereto. Contrary to Plaintiff's assertion that Defendant made an improper "blanket objection," Defendant examined and responded to each of the discovery requests and raised constitutional privileges, along with other alternative objections applicable to the specific interrogatory or production request. See Exhibit A and B to Plaintiff's motion. (Although Defendant sets forth each of the interrogatories and requests below, because Plaintiff has attached the responses as Exhibits to her motion, Defendant does not retype the responses in their entirety herein).
+
+The circumstances of this case (and the others) are such that not only does Defendant EPSTEIN face allegations of sexual misconduct with and abuse, exploitation, and sexual battery of alleged minors in this and other civil actions, but he also faces criminal prosecution based on the same factual allegations. The Plaintiffs attorney represents Jane Doe Nos. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7, in civil actions against EPSTEIN filed in
+
+this Court. (There are additional state and federal civil actions against EPSTEIN). In this and the other civil actions, the Plaintiffs reference federal and state criminal statutes in an attempt to allege claims ranging from sexual battery to intentional infliction of emotional distress, to a violation of 18 U.S.C. 2422, entitled "Coercion and enticement, contained in Title 18, "Crimes and Criminal Procedure," Part I — "Crimes,' Chapter 117 — "Transportation for Illegal Sexual Activity and Related Crimes'," to a cause of action pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §2255 — which creates a civil remedy for personal injuries where a plaintiff can show a violation of specified statutory criminal statues. Plaintiff is attempting to allege a violation of 18 U.S.C. §2422. See endnote 1 for current text of 18 U.S.C. §2422, along with pre-2006 amended text. See Exhibit B hereto - copy of Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint.
+
+Plaintiff alleges that `4 a Palm Beach Community College student," was an "integral player in Epstein's Florida scheme;" "she recruited girls ostensibly to give a wealthy man a massage for monetary compensation ... ." 2d Am. Complaint, ¶10. (In civil actions by Jane Doe No. 2 and Jane Doe No. 5, also before this court, the Plaintiffs therein allege that ' , Epstein's assistant" was a part of "Epstein's plan and scheme (which) reflected a particular pattern and method" in the alleged recruiting of girl's to come to EPSTEIN's Palm Beach mansion and give him "massages" in exchange for money. Jane Doe No.2 and Jane Doe No. 5 - 2nd Am. Complaint, ¶11- 12.) According to the complaint allegations — "Upon information and belief Epstein has a sexual preference and obsession for underage minor girls." ¶8. Once at Epstein's Palm Beach mansion, the "victim" would be "led up a flight of stairs to a bedroom that contained a massage table ... ." The girl would be alone with EPSTEIN. EPSTEIN
+
+would be "wearing only a towel to cover his private area." Epstein "then would lay down on the massage table and perform one or more lewd, lascivious and sexual acts, including masturbation and touching the girl sexually." 2nd Am. Complaint, ¶11, Exhibit B. Plaintiff alleges that "in 2004-2005," she, "then approximately 16 years old, fell into Epstein's trap and became one of his victims." ¶8.
+
+Jane Doe No. 3 further alleges that brought her to Epstein's Palm Beach mansion, where she was led up a flight of stairs a room with a massage table. "She was alone in the room when Epstein arrived wearing a towel to cover his private parts." Plaintiff alleges that Epstein "sexually assaulted" her and "masturbated" "during the massage" 2d Am. Complaint, ¶12. Plaintiff also alleges that EPSTEIN "maintains his principal home in New York and also owns residences in New Mexico, St.a and Palm Beach, FL." Id, ¶7. "Upon information and belief, Jeffrey Epstein carried out his scheme and assaulted girls in Florida, New York and on his private island, known as Little St. James, in St. M" Id, ¶9. The nature of the allegations is (obviously) serious.
+
+The threat of criminal prosecution is real and present as EPSTEIN remains under the scrutiny of the United States Attorney's Office (USAO) which, as explained more fully herein, possesses the power to move forward with its criminal prosecution against EPSTEIN. EPSTEIN entered into a Non-Prosecution Agreement ("NPA") with United States Attorney General's Office for the Federal Southern District of Florida. The terms and conditions of the NPA also entailed EPSTEIN entering into a Plea Agreement with the State Attorney's Office, Palm Beach County, State of Florida. By its terms, the NPA took effect on June 30, 2008. As well, pursuant to the NPA, any criminal prosecution
+
+against EPSTEIN is deferred as long as the terms and conditions of the NPA are fulfilled by EPSTEIN. Criminal matters against EPSTEIN remain ongoing until the NPA expires by its terms in late 2010 and as long as the USAO determines that EPSTEIN has complied with those terms and conditions. The threat of criminal prosecution against EPSTEIN by the USAO continues presently and through late 2010. The USAO possesses the right to declare that the agreement has been breached, give EPSTEIN's counsel notice, and attempt to move forward with the prosecution. In other words, the fact that there exists a NPA does not mean that EPSTEIN is free from future criminal prosecution. In fact, the threat of prosecution is real, substantial, and present. See attached Exhibit "A", Affidavit of Jack A. Goldberger, a board certified criminal defense attorney who has in the past and is currently representing EPSTEIN.
+
+## A.
+
+# Memorandum of Law Supporting Application of Constitutional Privileges
+
+The Fifth Amendment provides in relevant part that "No person ... shall be compelled in any Criminal Case to be a witness against himself? Hoffman v. United States, 341 U.S. 479, 486, 71 S.Ct. 814 (1951), citing v. United States, 1944, 322 U.S. 487, 489, 64 S.Ct. 1082, 1083, 88 L.Ed. 1408." The Fifth Amendment's privilege against self-incrimination is "accorded liberal construction in favor of the right it was intended to secure." "The immediate and potential evils of compulsory selfdisclosure transcend any difficulties that the exercise of the privilege may impose on society in the detection and prosecution of a crime." Id, at 490; and In re Financial Svcs. of Fla., Inc., 259 B.R. 391, 399 (M.D. Fla. 2000). The privilege not only extends to answers that would in themselves support a conviction under a criminal statute but likewise embraces those which would furnish a link in the chain of evidence
+
+needed to prosecute the claimant for a crime. Id, citing Blau v. United States, 1950, 340 U.S. 159, 71 S.Ct. 223. The Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination "permits a person not to answer official questions put to him in any other proceeding, civil or criminal, formal or informal, where the answers might incriminate him in future criminal proceedings." Edwin v. Price, 778 F.2d 668, 669 (11th Cir. 1985), citing Lefkowitz v. Turley, 414 U.S. 70, 77, 94 S.C. 316, 322 (1973). See also Ohio v. Reiner, 532 U.S. 17, 21, 121 S.Ct. 1252 (2001)(The Fifth Amendment privilege is also available to those who claim innocence. One of the Fifth Amendment's "basic functions ... is to protect innocent men ... 'who otherwise might be ensnared by ambiguous circumstances."); Malloy v. Hogan 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment - "[lit would be incongruous to have different standards determine the validity of a claim of privilege based on the same feared prosecution, depending on whether the claim was asserted in state or federal court.")' Kastigar v. U.S. 406 U.S. 441, 444-45, 92 S.Ct. 1653 (1972)(The Fifth Amendment privilege "can be asserted in any proceeding, civil or criminal, administrative or judicial, investigatory or adjudicatory; and it protects against any disclosures which the witness reasonably believes could be used in a criminal prosecution or could lead to other evidence that might be so used. This Court has been zealous to safeguard the values which underlie the privilege." (Emphasis added)).
+
+As EPSTEIN is here, "the claimant must be 'confronted by substantial and 'real,' and not merely trifling or imaginary, hazards of incrimination." See generally United States v. Apfelbaum, 445 U.S. 115, 128, 100 S.Ct. 948, 956, 63 L.Ed.2d 250 (1980)).
+
+See also, United States v. Neff, 615 F.2d 1235, 1239 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 925, 100 S.Ct. 3018, 65 L.Ed.2d 1117 (1980)(Information is protected by the privilege not only if it would support a criminal conviction, but even if "the responses would merely 'provide a lead or clue' to evidence having a tendency to incriminate.").
+
+The United States Supreme Court has made clear that the scope of the Fifth Amendment Privilege also encompasses the circumstance where "the act of producing documents in response to a subpoena (or production request) has a compelled testimonial aspect." United States v. Hubbell 530 U.S. 27, 36, 120 S.Ct. 2037, 2043 (2000); see also Fisher v. United States 425 U.S. 391 (1976); McCormick on Evidence, Title 6, Chap. 13. The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination, §138 (611 Ed.). In explaining the application of the privilege, the Supreme Court stated:
+
+We have held that "the act of production" itself may implicitly communicate "statements of fact." By "producing documents in compliance with a subpoena, the witness would admit that the papers existed, were in his possession or control, and were authentic."s Fr Moreover, as was true in this case, when the custodian of documents responds to a subpoena, he may be compelled to take the witness stand and answer questions designed to determine whether he has produced everything demanded by the subpoena. Fazg The answers to those questions, as well as the act of production itself, may certainly communicate information about the existence, custody, and authenticity of the documents. Whether the constitutional privilege protects the answers to such questions, or protects the act of production itself, is a question that is distinct from the question whether the unprotected contents of the documents themselves are incriminating.
+
+FN19. "The issue presented in those cases was whether the act of producing subpoenaed documents, not itself the making of a statement, might nonetheless have some protected testimonial aspects. The Court concluded that the act of production could constitute protected testimonial communication because it might entail implicit statements of fact: by producing documents in compliance with a subpoena, the witness would admit that the papers existed, were in his possession or control, and were authentic. United States v. Doe, 465 U.S., at 613. and n. 11, 104 S.Ct. 123T Fisher, 425 U.S., at 409-410, 96 S.Ct. 1569; id., at 428, 432, 96 S.Ct. 1569 (concurring opinions). See Braswell v. United States, 1487
+
+U.S.,] at 104, 108 S.Ct. 2284; [ *id.*,] at 122, 108 S.Ct. 2284 (dissenting opinion). Thus, the Court made clear that the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination applies to acts that imply assertions of fact. "... An examination of the Court's application of these principles in other cases indicates the Court's recognition that, in order to be testimonial, an accused's communication must itself, explicitly or implicitly, relate a factual assertion or disclose information. Only then is a person compelled to be a 'witness' against himself." Doe v. United States, 487 U.S., at 209-210, 108 S.Ct. 2341 (footnote omitted).
+
+FN20. See App. 62-70. Thus, for example, after respondent had been duly sworn by the grand jury [ ], the prosecutor called his attention to paragraph A of the Subpoena Rider (reproduced in the Appendix, *infra*, at 2048-2049) and asked whether he had produced "all those documents." App. 65.
+
+Finally, the phrase "in any criminal case" in the text of the Fifth Amendment might have been read to limit its coverage to compelled testimony that is used against the defendant in the trial itself. It has, however, long been settled that its protection encompasses compelled statements that lead to the discovery of incriminating evidence even though the statements themselves are not incriminating and are not introduced into evidence. Thus, a half century ago we held that a trial judge had erroneously rejected a defendant's claim of privilege on the ground that his answer to the pending question would not itself constitute evidence of the charged offense. As we explained:
+
+"The privilege afforded not only extends to answers that would in themselves support a conviction under a federal criminal statute but likewise embraces those which would furnish a link in the chain of evidence needed to prosecute the claimant for a federal crime." Hoffman v. United States, 341 U.S. 479, 486, 71 S.Ct. 814, 95 L.Ed. 1118 (1951).
+
+Compelled testimony that communicates information that may "lead to incriminating evidence" is privileged even if the information itself is not inculpatory. Doe v. United States, 487 U.S. 201, 208, n. 6, 108 S.Ct. 2341, 101 L.Ed.2d 184 (1988). It's the Fifth Amendment's protection against the prosecutor's use of incriminating information derived directly or indirectly from the compelled testimony of the respondent that is of primary relevance in this case.
+
+In summarizing its holding regarding the application of the Fifth Amendment Privilege to a production request, the Hubbell Court left "no doubt that the constitutional privilege against self incrimination protects" not only "the target of a grand jury investigation from being compelled to answer questions designed to elicit information
+
+about the existence of sources of potentially incriminating evidence," but the privilege also "has the same application to the testimonial aspect of a response to a subpoena seeking discovery of those sources." At 43, and 2047.
+
+The privilege against self-incrimination may be asserted during discovery when a litigant has "reasonable grounds to believe that the response would furnish a link in the chain of evidence needed to prove a crime against a litigant." A witness, including a civil defendant, is entitled to invoke the Fifth Amendment privilege whenever there is a realistic possibility that the answer to a question could be used in anyway to convict the witness of a crime or could aid in the development of other incriminating evidence that can be used at trial. Id; Pillsbury Company v. Conboy, 495 U.S. 248, 103 S.Ct. 608 (1983). See also Hubbell, supra, quoted above as to what is encompassed by the phrase "in any criminal case" contained in the Fifth Amendment.
+
+As noted, the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination is broad. Hoffman; In re Financial Svcs. supra. To deny a witness the right to invoke the privilege, the judge must be perfectly clear, from a careful consideration of all the circumstances in the case, that the witness is mistaken, and that the answers cannot possibly have such tendency to incriminate. Id at 488, 399. Recognizing the breadth and magnitude of this constitutional privilege, the United States Supreme Court in discussing how a court is to analyze the application of the privilege stated —
+
+... It is for the court to say whether his silence is justified Rogers v. United States, 1951, 340 U.S. 367, 71 S.Ct. 438, and to require him to answer if 'it clearly appears to the court that he is mistaken.' Temple v. Commonwealth, 1880, 75 Va. 892, 899. However, if the witness, upon interposing his claim, were required to prove the hazard in the sense in which a claim is usually required to be established in court, he would be compelled to surrender the very protection which the privilege is designed to guarantee. To sustain the privilege, it need only be evident from the implications of the question, in the
+
+> setting in which it is asked, that a responsive answer to the question or an explanation of why it cannot be answered might be dangerous because injurious disclosure could result. The trial judge in appraising the claim 'must be governed as much by his personal perception of the peculiarities of the case as by the facts actually in evidence.'
+
+Hoffman, supra at 486487.
+
+Hoffman and its progeny establish that "in view of the liberal construction of the provision [protecting against self-incrimination], after a witness has asserted the privilege, he should be compelled to provide the requested information only if it "clearly appears" to the court that the witness was mistaken in his invocation of the privilege." (Emphasis added). In re Financial Svcs., supra at 399, citing Hoffman, at 486.
+
+Finally, in order to preserve the privilege against self-incrimination, as EPSTEIN has properly done is response to each discovery request, the privilege must be asserted or one risks the loss or waiver of this liberty ensuring protection. See generally, U.S. v. M, 846 F.2d 678, 690 (11th Cir. 1988)("First, it ignores the settled principle which requires a witness to assert his Fifth Amendment rights. A witness who testifies at any proceeding, instead of asserting his Fifth Amendment rights, loses the privilege. ... A civil deponent cannot choose to answer questions with the expectation of later asserting the Fifth Amendment.").
+
+In the instant case, the privilege applies as Defendant EPSTEIN "has reasonable cause to apprehend danger from a direct answer." The risk of incrimination resulting from answering each of the interrogatories and requests for production is "substantial and real" and "not trifling or imaginary haphazards of communication." See generally, In re Financial Svcs., supra at 400. Based on the nature of Plaintiff's claims, along with the ongoing scrutiny of the USA() in the criminal mailers, EPSTEIN has
+
+"reasonable grounds to believe that his responses to the discovery would furnish a link in the chain of evidence needed to prove a crime against him. The very nature of the claims brought and the discovery being sought by Plaintiff in order to attempt to prove those claims establish a realistic possibility that the answer to an interrogatory or production request could be used in a type of way to convict EPSTEIN of a crime or aid in the development of other incriminating evidence that can be used at a criminal trial. Under the circumstances of this case, the threat of criminal prosecution is not imaginary. See Exhibits A and B to Plaintiffs Motion to Compel. This Court is well aware of the "peculiarities" of this action as it has before it other civil actions against EPSTEIN, all alleging similar underlying facts of sexual misconduct involving minors. The allegations of this action and others entail EPSTEIN allegedly "recruiting" Plaintiff and other minors to come to his home in Palm Beach to give him massages which allegedly became sexually inappropriate in nature, and EPSTEIN in turn would pay the minors. See Chapter 110 of Title 18, United States Code Annotated; and "predicate acts" specified in 18 U.S.C. §2255.
+
+Also applicable in upholding the assertion of Defendant's Fifth Amendment privilege is the guarantee of effective assistance of counsel by the Sixth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. See Yarborough v. Gentry 124 S.Ct. 1, 540 U.S. 1, 157 L.Ed.2d 1 (2003)(Sixth Amendment guarantees criminal defendants effective assistance of counsel.), on remand 381 F.3d 1219. The United States Constitutional guarantees are applicable to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment. Obviously, EPSTEIN's assertion of his constitutional privileges and protections is on the advice of counsel. EPSTEIN continues to face criminal prosecution by the USAO until the expiration of the
+
+NPA; under the constitutional guarantee of effective assistance of counsel, he is entitled to follow the recommended advice of his criminal defense attorney. See Exhibit A hereto. A review of the complaint allegations and the circumstances of this case including multiple civil actions attempting to allege claims based upon sexual abuse and exploitation of minors, parallel criminal matter under which EPSTEIN continues to face prosecution for crimes based on the same allegations until the terms of the NPA have expired and been fulfilled as determined by the USAO - establish that EPSTEIN's invocation of his constitutional protections of the Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments be upheld; otherwise such constitutional protections would be rendered meaningless.
+
+### Circuit Court, State of Florida, recently entered order upholding assertion of Fifth Amendment and constitutional based protections in response to discovery.
+
+Further requiring the sustaining of Defendant's assertions of his constitutional protections, the 15th Judicial Circuit Court in and for Palm Beach County, State of Florida, recently entered an order sustaining Defendant's assertion of his 5th, 6th and 14th Amendment privileges and protections in response to Plaintiff A.C.'s request for production in A.C. v. Epstein, Case No. 502008CA025129XXXXMB Al. The Order, dated February 23, 2009, and the production requests and Defendant's responses are attached hereto as Composite Exhibit C. (Compare Requests for Production Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 4 in the instant case with the production request no. 1 in Composite Exhibit C hereto; compare requests nos. 20 and 21 in this case with nos. 2 and 3 in Comp. Ex. C; and compare information sought in interrogatories nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, and 15 in this case with information sought in request nos. 2 and 3 in Comp. Ex. C).
+
+#### B. Even if the Court were to agree with Plaintiffs assertion that Defendant has asserted a "blank privilege" under the Fifth Amendment, under the facts and circumstances of this case, such assertion would be proper.
+
+Plaintiff claims that Defendant has improperly asserted a "blanket privilege" to the discovery. As stated above, Defendant disagrees. Defendant evaluated each and every discovery request in asserting applicable constitutional privileges and other objections. The facts and circumstances of this case are such that in evaluating each of the interrogatories and production requests on an individual basis, the constitutional protections asserted by Defendant apply to each. The Court will note that the additional objections raised are also tailored to each interrogatory and production request. Even the Court's analysis of the discovery will be on an individualized basis. However, simply for the sake of argument, as to Plaintiffs assertion that Defendant has made a "blanket assertion," under the facts and circumstances of this case, such an assertion is proper.
+
+In allowing a blanket assertion, Courts have recognized a narrow exception to the rule that the assertion of the privilege must be to each specific question. The Courts, including this Circuit, acknowledged "an exception ... (where,) based on its knowledge of the case and of the testimony expected from the witness, (the trial court) can conclude that the witness could 'legitimately refuse to answer essentially all relevant questions." United States v. Goodwin, 625 F.2d 693, 701 (5th Cir. Fla. 1980)); United States v. Tsui 646 F.2d 365, 367-68 (9th Cir. 1981). This exception is narrow and is applicable where the trial judge has "some special or extensive knowledge of the case that allows evaluation of the claimed Fifth Amendment privilege even in the absence of specific questions to the witness." Id. See also U.S. v.a 157 Fed.Appx. 215, 218 (11th Cir. Ga. 2005)("A district court must make a particularized inquiry, evaluating whether the privilege applies with respect to each specific area that the questioning
+
+party wishes to explore. Melchor Moreno, 536 F.2d at 1049. The witness may be totally excused from testifying only if the court finds that he could legitimately refuse to answer essentially all relevant questions. United States v. Goodwin 625 F.2d 693, 701 (5th Cir.1980).").
+
+See also State of Washington v. DelGado, 18 P.3d 1141 (Wa. Ct. of App. Div. 2 2001)("There is a narrow exception allowing a blanket privilege where "based on its knowledge of the case and of the testimony expected of the witness, [the trial court] can conclude that the witness could legitimately refuse to answer essentially all relevant questions. ... For the exception to apply, the trial judge must have 'some special or extensive knowledge of the case that allows evaluation of the claimed ... privilege even in absence of specific questions to the witness.").
+
+C. Plaintiffs statement of the law in section IV, (pp. 6-7), of her motion is incorrect under the circumstances. Contrary to Plaintiffs assertion, an adverse Inference from invocation of the Fifth Amendment in a civil case is not always permitted.
+
+In section IV, (pp. 6-7), of Plaintiffs motion to compel, Plaintiffs general claim that an adverse interest based on a defendant's invocation of the Fifth Amendment in a civil case may be made is improper under the facts and circumstances of this case. Plaintiff is correct as to the general rule that "adverse inferences may be drawn in the civil context when Defendants invoke the privilege in refusing to testify in response to probative evidence offered against them." F.T.C. v. Transnet Wireless Corp., 506 F.Supp.2d 1247, 1252, fn. 4 (S.D.Fla.,2007), citing Mitchell v. United States, 526 U.S. 314, 328, 119 S.Ct. 1307, 143 L.Ed.2d 424 (1999). However, there exists a well recognized exception to the general rule — "Courts may not draw adverse inferences, however, if it is the sole basis for Plaintiff's prima facie case, or will cause the "automatic
+
+entry of summary judgment." See generally F.T.C., supra, at fn.4, citing United States v. Premises Located at Route 13, 946 F.2d 749, 756 (11th Cir.1991) (citing Pervis v. State Farm and Cas. Co. 901 F.2d 944, 948 (11th Cir.1990)). See also S.E.C. v. Keith Group of Companies, Inc. 1998 WL 1670405 (S.D. Fla. 1998)("When a party is a defendant in both a civil and criminal case and is forced to choose between waiving his Fifth Amendment privilege ... or losing the civil case on summary judgment, an exception to the general rule ... applies. In such a situation, the Court may not make an adverse inference about the party's refusal to testify.") Accordingly, Defendant's assertion that an adverse interest "under the circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the constitution," is both proper and required to be upheld at this time.
+
+# D. Plaintiffs Amended First Set of Interrogatories to Defendant
+
+Listed below is each of the interrogatories propounded by Plaintiff. As noted above, Defendant responded to each interrogatory separately in raising his constitutional privileges and guarantees, and, in the alternative, raising specific other applicable objections to each. See Exhibit A to Plaintiffs motion to compel.
+
+No. 1. Identify all employees who performed work of services inside the Palm Beach Residence.
+
+No. 2. Identify all Employees not identified in response to interrogatory no. 1 who at any time came to Defendant's Palm Beach Residence.
+
+No. 3. Identify all persons who came to the Palm Beach Residence and who gave a massage or were asked to give a massage to Defendant.
+
+No. 4. Identify all persons who came to the New York Residence and who gave a massage or were asked to give a massage to Defendant.
+
+No. 5. Identify all persons who came to the New Mexico Residence and who gave a massage or were asked to give a massage to Defendant.
+
+No. 6. Identify all persons who came to the St.l= Residence and who gave a massage or were asked to give a massage to Defendant.
+
+No. 7. List all the time periods during which Jeffrey Epstein was present in the State of Florida, including for each the date he arrive and the date he departed.
+
+No. 8. Identify all of Jeffrey Epstein health care providers in the past (10) ten years, including without limitation, psychologists, psychiatrists, mental health counselors, physicians, hospitals and treatment facilities.
+
+No. 9. (Not at Issue.)' List all items in Jeffrey Epstein's possession in Palm Beach, Florida, at any time during the period of these interrogatories, which were used or intended to be used as sexual aids, sex toys, massage aids, and/or vibrators, and for each, list the manufacturer, model number (if applicable), and its present location.
+
+No. 10. Identify all persons who provide transportation services to Jeffrey Epstein, whether as employees or independent contractors, including without limitation, chauffeurs and aircraft crew.
+
+No. 11. Identify all telephone numbers used by Epstein, including cellular phones and land lines in any of his residences, by stating the complete telephone number and the name of the service provider.
+
+No. 12. Identify all telephone numbers of employees of Epstein, used in the course or scope of their employment, including cellular phones and land lines in any of his residences, by stating the complete telephone number and the name of the service provider.
+
+No. 13. List the names and addresses of all persons who are believed or known by you, your agents, or your attorneys to have any knowledge concerning any of the issues in this lawsuit; and specify the subject matter about which the witness has knowledge.
+
+No. 14. State the name and address of every person known to you, your agents, or your attorneys who has knowledge about, possession, or custody, or control of, any model, plat, map, drawing, motion picture, videotape or photograph pertaining to any fact or issue involved in this controversy; and describe as to each, what item such person has, the name and address of the person who took or prepared it, and the date it was taken or prepared.
+
+No. 15. Identify all persons who have made a claim, complaint, demand or threat against you relating to alleged sexual abuse or misconduct on a minor and for each provide the following information:
+
+- a. The person's full name, last known address and telephone number;
+- b. The person's attorney, if represented;
+- c. The date of the alleged incident(s);
+- d. If a civil case has been filed by or on behalf of the person, the case number and identifying information.
+
+<sup>&#</sup>x27; Fn. 4 of Plaintiff's motion states — "Plaintiff does not challenge at this time Defendant's Fifth Amendment privilege in response to interrogatory no. 9, which seeks information of Defendant's sexual aids."
+
+No. 16. State the facts upon which you intend to rely for each denial of a pleading allegation and for each affirmative defense you intend to make in these cases.
+
+No. 17. Identify all witnesses from whom you have obtained or requested a written, transcribed or recorded statement relating to any issue in these cases, and for each, in addition to the witness's identifying information, state the date of the statement and identify the person taking the statement.
+
+(Emphasis added).
+
+Defendant will address interrogatories nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, 13, 14, 15, 16, and 17, above, as the analysis as to the application of the constitutional privileges and protections is straightforward. Nos. 3 through 6 ask Defendant to identify anyone who gave "massages" or were asked to give "massages" to him. Clearly, any answer to these interrogatories, involve compelled statements that would furnish a link in the chain of evidence needed to prosecute the Defendant in future criminal proceedings or even support a criminal conviction. These interrogatories seek the precise information that the USAO investigated and continues to scrutinize. See Exhibit A hereto.
+
+Any answer to no. 15, which seeks information "relating to alleged sexual abuse or misconduct on a minor," on its face would also lead to incriminating evidence protected under the Fifth Amendment privilege. The same is true for no. 16 — which seeks "facts upon which you intend to rely for each denial of a pleading allegation and for each affirmative defense," and Nos. 13, 14, and 17 which seek to compel EPSTEIN to list any persons or witnesses in 13 "having any knowledge concerning any of the issues in this lawsuit," in 14 having "knowledge about, possession, or custody, or control of, any model, plat, map, drawing, motion picture, videotape or photograph pertaining to any fact or issue involved in this controversy," and in 17 "whom you have obtained or requested a written, transcribed or recorded statement relating to any issue in these cases." In answering no. 16, Defendant would be compelled to testify as to his version
+
+of the facts, and, in asserting affirmative defenses, he would further be compelled to admit Plaintiffs version of the facts. In listing such person or witness, the Defendant is further compelled to describe the subject matter, nature of the items and or statements of such witness or person. Again, the allegations of this action are such that in answering these interrogatories, Defendant is being compelled to incriminate himself in crimes. By answering the specified interrogatories Defendant is being compelled to testify as to the issues and facts not only asserted in Plaintiffs complaint, but also to facts which present a real and substantial danger of self-incrimination. Again, the information sought all relate to claims of sexual abuse and exploitation of a minor. (See Chapter 110 of Title 18, United States Code Annotated; and "predicate acts" specified in 18 U.S.C. §2255, and 18 U.S.C. §2422).
+
+Any answer to nos. 1 and 2 would also be compelled testimony that "tends to show that the witness himself (EPSTEIN) committed a crime" based on the nature of the allegations. As noted above, Plaintiff alleges that at least one of EPSTEIN's employees, was part of the scheme or plan of sexual misconduct, exploitation and abuse of the "girls." No. 1 is asking for any employee who performed work or services, and no. 2 is asking EPSTEIN to testify as to anyone who came to his Palm Beach mansion. Such compelled testimony is protected under the Fifth Amendment as the answers "would furnish a link in the chain of evidence needed to prosecute the claimant for a crime." Answering the questions as to who came and went from his Palm Beach mansion would provide a "'lead or clue' to evidence having a tendency to incriminate." See also 18 U.S.C. 2422, Coercion and Enticement. This analysis also applies to interrogatory nos. 7 and 9 which seek, respectively, "all the time
+
+periods during which Jeffrey Epstein was present in the State of Florida, including for each the date he arrive and the date he departed," and "all persons who provide transportation services to Jeffrey Epstein, whether as employees or independent contractors, including without limitation, chauffeurs and aircraft crew." Plaintiff alleges a time period of 2004-05 as to when the alleged to when the sexual misconduct, including sexual assault, of a minor took place in Palm Beach, Florida. Plaintiff also alleges that EPSTEIN engaged in the same "scheme and plan" against minor girls at his other places of residence. Again, EPSTEIN's answer as to his travels to and from Florida, and within Florida, would be a link in the chain of evidence needed to convict him of a crime.
+
+The privilege against self-incrimination also applies to Nos. 11 and 12 which seek, respectively, "all telephone numbers used by Epstein, including cellular phones and land lines in any of his residences, by stating the complete telephone number and the name of the service provider," and "all telephone numbers of employees of Epstein, used in the course or scope of their employment, including cellular phones and land lines in any of his residences, by stating the complete telephone number and the name of the service provider." Again, such compelled testimony would self-incriminate EPSTEIN based on the elements required to establish a violation of the criminal statute 18 U.S.C. §2422. Such information would be a link in the chain of evidence needed to prosecute EPSTEIN for a crime.
+
+Finally, the compelled testimony sought in no. 8 - "all of Jeffrey Epstein health care providers in the past (10) ten years, including without limitation, psychologists, psychiatrists, mental health counselors, physicians, hospitals and treatment facilities,"
+
+could also lead to a link in the chain of evidence to convict EPSTEIN based on the allegations which are criminal in nature — sexual misconduct with minors, and a plan and scheme to "recruit" such minors to fulfill Epstein's "sexual preference and obsession." See ¶8 of complaint — "Upon information and belief Epstein has a sexual preference and obsession for underage minor girls."
+
+As explained in Hoffman EPSTEIN is not required to "prove the hazard in the sense in which a claim is usually required to be established in court." The United States Supreme Court recognized placing such a requirement on a person asserting his constitutional privilege is in effect tantamount compelling him "to surrender the very protection which the privilege is designed to guarantee." Under the facts and circumstances of this case, it is evident from the implications of each of the interrogatories or an explanation of why they can't be answered "might be dangerous because injurious disclosure might result." Id.
+
+Accordingly, under applicable law and the facts of this case, Defendant's assertion of the constitutional privilege and guarantee under the 5th, 6th and 14th Amendments of the United States Constitution are required to be upheld.
+
+# E. Plaintiffs First Production Request To Defendant
+
+The constitutional protections are equally applicable to the request for production propounded on Defendant by Plaintiff. See Exhibit B to Plaintiffs motion to compel. The requests are as follows -
+
+Request No. 1. The list provided to you by the U.S. Attorney of individuals whom the U.S. Attorney was prepared to name in an Indictment as victims of an offense by Mr. Epstein enumerated in 18 U.S.C. §2255.
+
+Request No. 2. All documents referring or relating to the United States' agreement with Defendant to defer federal prosecution subject to certain conditions, including without limitation,
+
+the operative agreement between Defendant and the United States and all amendments, revisions and supplements thereto.
+
+Request No. 3. All documents referring or relating to Defendant's agreement with the State of Florida on his plea of guilty to violations of Florida Criminal Statutes, including without limitation, the operative plea agreement and any amendments, revisions and supplements thereto.
+
+Request No.4. All documents obtained in discovery or investigation relating to either the Florida Criminal Case or the Federal Criminal Case, including without limitation, documents obtained from any federal, state, or local law enforcement agency, the State Attorney's office and the United States Attorney's office.
+
+Request No. 5. All telephone records and other documents reflecting telephone calls made by or to Defendant, including without limitation, telephone logs and message pads.
+
+Request No. 6. All telephone records and other documents reflecting telephone calls made by or to Defendant, including without limitation, telephone logs and message pads, reflecting telephone calls made by or to employees.
+
+Request No. 7. All surveillance videos, slides, film, videotape, digital recording or other audio or video depiction or image of the Palm Beach Residence.
+
+Request No. 8. All documents referring or relating to Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 2, including without limitation, web pages, social networking site pages, correspondence, videotapes and audiotapes.
+
+Request No. 9. (Not at issue).2 All statements taken, transcribed or recorded from any person referring or relating to Defendant's sexual conduct, massages given to Defendant or any issue in these cases.
+
+Request No. 10. All documents referring to or relating to air travel and aircraft used by Defendant, including without limitation, flight logs and flight manifests.
+
+Request No. 11. Any and all documents referring to or relating to modeling agencies, including but not limited to documents relating to or reflecting communications with female models.
+
+Request No. 12. (Not at Issue). All photographs, videotapes, digital images and other documents depicting or showing females who, at the time thereof, were under the age of 21, which were taken or created by or for Defendant and not intended for sale commercially to the public.
+
+Request No. 13. (Not at Issue.) All photographs and painting of females which were displayed in any of Defendants homes or residences in the time frame of these requests, including without limitation, photographs in standing or sitting frames or wall frames.
+
+<sup>2</sup>Plaintiff concedes that the act of producing items in response to request no. 9, conceming witness statements, and requests nos. 12-13, concerning photographs or images of females, may implicate the Fifth Amendment." Plaintiffs motion, p. 5, fn. 6.
+
+Request No. 14. Any and all documents consisting of, referring or relating to communications between Jeffrey Epstein and , including, but not limited to, letters, notes, text messages, messages on social networking sites, and e-mails.
+
+Request No. 15. Any and all nsisting of, referring or relating to communications between Jeffrey Epstein and , including, but not limited to, letters, notes, text messages, messages on social networking sites, and e-mails.
+
+Request No. 16. Any and all documents consisting of, referring or relating to communications between Jeffrey Epstein and L , including, but not limited to, letters, notes, text messages, messages on social networking sites, and e-mails.
+
+Request No. 17. Any and all documents consisting of, referring or relating to communications between Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, including, but not limited to, letters, notes, text messages, messages on social networking sites, and e-mails.
+
+Request No. 18. Any and all documents and photographs placed by Defendant at any time in the period of these requests on a social networking website, including without limitation, Facebook.com and MySpace.com.
+
+Request No. 19. Any and all documents reflecting or consisting of communications between Jeffrey Epstein and MC2 Models or Jean-Luc Brunel, relating or referring to females coming into the United States from other countries to pursue a career in modeling, including, but not limited to, letters, notes and e-mails.
+
+Request No. 20. Any and all documents referring or relating to gifts or loans to females under the age of 21, including, but not limited to, notes, receipts and car rental agreements.
+
+Request No. 21. Any and all personal calendars or schedules of or for Jeffrey Epstein from January 1, 2003 to the present.
+
+Request No. 22. All documents written by Jeffrey Epstein consisting of personal thoughts, feelings or descriptions of events, incidents or occurrences in Defendant's life, including without limitation, any diaries of Jeffrey Epstein.
+
+Request No. 23. All documents referring to or relating to Jeffrey Epstein's purchase or consumption of prescription medicine.
+
+As discussed in the supporting memorandum law herein, it is well settled that the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination also encompasses situations as here where the act of production itself involves a testimonial compulsion. Hubbell supra. In responding to each request, EPSTEIN would be compelled admit that such documents existed, admit that the documents were in his possession or control, and were authentic. In other words, the very act of production of the category of documents
+
+requested would implicitly communicate "statements of fact." Hubbell supra. Hoffman, supra. The act of production might not only provide evidence to support a conviction, but also a link in the chain of evidence for prosecution. Such compulsion to produce is the same as being compelled to testify. The acts of EPSTEIN in being required to produce the requested documents imply assertions of fact — admitting the documents exist, admitting the documents are in his possession or control, and admitting the documents are authentic. Again, in reading each of the production requests in Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, and 23, (like the interrogatories), it is clear that the very act of production of such documents could implicate EPSTEIN in a crime.
+
+As noted above, EPSTEIN is constitutionally entitled to follow the advice of counsel in asserting the applicable Fifth Amendment privilege under the guarantee of effective assistance of counsel. Accordingly, based on the facts and circumstances of this case, and under applicable law, Defendant's assertion of the protections afforded under the 5th, 61h, and 14'h Amendments of the United States Constitution are required to be upheld.
+
+#### ii. Defendant's obiections made in addition to the constitutional based protections are required to be upheld.
+
+## A. Constitutional issues are required to be addressed first.
+
+Obviously, the constitutional issues raised in Defendant's response permeate not only discovery, but the entire action itself. Defendant would suggest to the Court that the constitutional issues be decided before the additional objections are addressed. <sup>3</sup> In fact, in arguing certain of the additional objections, Defendant's constitutional rights
+
+<sup>3</sup> Should this Court overrule Defendant's constitutional based privileges and guarantees, Defendant will likely take an immediate appeal of such ruling.
+
+under the 5th, 6th and 14th Amendments are clearly implicated. In setting forth factual reasons to support the additional objections, Defendant is being compelled to testify in response to a specific discovery request, thus, impeding his privilege against selfincrimination and guarantee of effective assistance of counsel. The same is true if Defendant is required to prepare privilege logs. (In section IV of her motion, Plaintiff recognized, in addressing Defendant's assertion that an adverse inference would be improper, that "It is first necessary to determine whether the Fifth Amendment privilege is validly asserted in response to particular questions."). Thus, Defendant also requests that should this Court rule that the Fifth Amendment does not apply to certain of the discovery requests, that Defendant be given an additional 20 days from the date of the order thereon in which to assert other objections and privileges.
+
+In alternative and addition to the applicable constitutional based protections, Defendant also raised objections to each of the interrogatories and requests for production. (See sections V, VI, and VII, pp. 7-12, of Plaintiff's motion to compel). Defendant will address Plaintiffs arguments pertaining to the additional objections in the order presented in Plaintiff's motion.
+
+## B. Interrogatory No. 8, Production Request No. 23
+
+Section V. A. of plaintiffs motion pertains to interrogatory no. 8 -
+
+Identify all of Jeffrey Epstein health care providers in the past (10) ten years, including without limitation, psychologists, psychiatrists, mental health counselors, physicians, hospitals and treatment facilities.
+
+In addition to the constitutional protections, Defendant also stated —
+
+... In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, Defendant also objects as the interrogatory is overbroad and seeks information that is neither relevant to the subject matter of the pending action nor does it appear reasonably calculated to lead to
+
+> the discovery of admissible evidence. In addition, such information is privileged pursuant to Rule 501, Fed. Evid., and §90.503, Fla.Evid. Code. In addition, such information is protected by the provisions of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA).
+
+Federal Rule of Evidence 401 provides that - "'Relevant evidence" means evidence having any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action more probable or less probable than it would be without the evidence." Pursuant to Rule 26(b)(1), the scope of discovery is as follows —
+
+Unless otherwise limited by court order, the scope of discovery is as follows: Parties may obtain discovery regarding any nonprivileged matter that is relevant to any party's claim or defense--including the existence, description, nature, custody, condition, and location of any documents or other tangible things and the identity and location of persons who know of any discoverable matter. For good cause, the court may order discovery of any matter relevant to the subject matter involved in the action. Relevant information need not be admissible at the trial if the discovery appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. All discovery is subject to the limitations imposed by Rule 26(b)(2)(C).
+
+Plaintiffs complaint alleges a time period of 2004-05 as to when the alleged sexual misconduct of Defendant occurred. Plaintiffs request seeks to have EPSTEIN list "all health care providers" and "hospitals and treatment facilities" over a "ten year period." On its face, the interrogatory is overbroad as it seeks information over a 10 year period that is neither relevant nor does it "appear reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence." EPSTEIN's physical health is not in issue in this matter. Whether or not he was treated for the flu over the past ten years is not relevant to any party's claim or defense in this matter. The same is true for whether or not Defendant received treatment for a physical ailment at a hospital or facility over a 10 year period. Plaintiff fails to tailor her question such that it can be determined what type of information she is seeking regarding "health care providers" and "hospitals and treatment facilities." The 10 year period is overbroad as it seeks information approximately 5 years prior to and four years after the alleged incident.
+
+As to "psychologists, psychiatrists, mental health counselors," and the "hospitals and treatment facilities" where Defendant may or may not have received treatment from such professionals, such information would be protected under Fed. Evid. Rule 501 and §90.503, Fla.R.Evid. Rule 501 provides —
+
+Except as otherwise required by the Constitution of the United States or provided by Act of Congress or in rules prescribed by the Supreme Court pursuant to statutory authority, the privilege of a witness, person, government, State, or political subdivision thereof shall be governed by the principles of the common law as they may be interpreted by the courts of the United States in the light of reason and experience. However, in civil actions and proceedings, with respect to an element of a claim or defense as to which State law supplies the rule of decision, the privilege of a witness, person, government, State, or political subdivision thereof shall be determined in accordance with State law.
+
+(Emphasis added).
+
+Plaintiff alleges diversity jurisdiction, and thus, state law of Florida controls application of the privilege. 2ntl Am. Complaint, ¶5. The elements of Plaintiffs alleged claims in Counts I - Sexual Battery and Counts II — Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress are also controlled by state law. Erie R.Co. v. Tompkins, 58 S.Ct. 817 (1938). Accordingly, the privileges recognized under state law apply to this action under Rule 501. See, for example, 1550 Brickell Associates v. Q.B.E. Ins. Co. 253 F.R.D. 697, 699 (S.D. Fla. 2008)("Attorney-client privilege is governed by state law in diversity actions.").
+
+§90.503(2), Fla. Stat., provides —
+
+(2) A patient has a privilege to refuse to disclose, and to prevent any other person from disclosing, confidential communications or records made for the purpose of diagnosis or treatment of the patient's mental or emotional condition, including alcoholism and other drug addiction, between the patient and the psychotherapist, or persons who are participating in the diagnosis or treatment under the direction of the psychotherapist. This privilege includes any diagnosis made, and advice given, by the psychotherapist in the course of that relationship.
+
+As summarized in C.L. v. Judd, 993 So.2d 991, 995 (2d DCA Fla. 2007):
+
+> Under the psychotherapist-patient privilege, a patient has a privilege to refuse to disclose confidential information or records made for the purpose of diagnosis or treatment of mental conditions, including any diagnoses made by the psychotherapist. § 90.503(2), Fla. Stat. (2005); see Pauker v. Olson, 834 So.2d 198, 200 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002). The psychotherapist-patient privilege does not apply: (1) during involuntary commitment proceedings, (2) when there is a court-ordered mental examination, or (3) when the patient raises and relies on the issue of his or her mental condition in litigation as part of any claim or defense. § 90.503(4); Roberson, 884 So.2d at 980; State v. Famiglietti, 817 So.2d 901, 903 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002). The privilege does not allow the invasion of a patient's privileged communications with his or her psychotherapist. Roberson, 884 So.2d at 979.
+
+None of the three situations listed as exceptions to the privilege above exist in the present case to make the privilege inapplicable.
+
+Plaintiff's position is that the protection afforded under §90.503, Fla. Stat., does not apply "in a case of child abuse under Florida Statute §39.204." See endnote 2 for full text of §39.204, Fla. Stat.2 (¶'s Motion, p. 8-9). See Carson v. 466 So.2d 1188, 1192 (Fla. 41h DCA 1985); and Doherty v. John Doe No. 22, 957 So.2d 1267 (411 DCA 2007). A reading of these cases establishes that §39.204 does not provide Plaintiff with a carte blanche access to Defendant's medical history. The Court is required to hold an in camera inspection to determine if the information sought by Plaintiff relates to "communications involving known or expected child abuse." Id.
+
+As stated above, on its face the interrogatory is overbroad and encompasses information that has no relevance to the claims or defenses nor is it reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Compelling Defendant to identify each and every health care provider, including psychologists, psychiatrists, mental health counselors, and hospital or treatment facility over the past ten year period, is not proper at this time. Plaintiff should be required to limit the information
+
+sought, as well as the time period, in her interrogatory, thus allowing the Defendant and Court to determine whether such information is relevant and discoverable.
+
+As to Defendant's HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) objection, as noted in the case cited in Plaintiffs motion, v. Woodford, 2007 WL 309485 (E.D. Cal. 2007), (p. 9), HIPPA institutes procedural safeguards to protect the privacy of an individual's medical information and history. In the context of HIPAA, Courts have recognized three methods of health care discovery (assuming it's relevant) in civil litigation: (1) Obtaining a patient authorization that complies with the requirements and criteria, tailored to the specific case, of HIPAA as set forth in 45 C.F.R. §164.508; (2) Court Order, which also complies with the requirements of HIPAA ensuring that the privacy and confidentiality of the information is protected; and (3) Subpoena or discovery request, which again comply with the strictures of HIPAA, including that the person whose records are being sought has been given proper notice. See Handbook of Federal Civil Discovery And Disclosure (2d Edition), Chap. 18, Sect. A - Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), §18.3 — Discovery of health care information in civil litigation; and Graham v. Dacheikh 991 So.2d 932, at fn. 3 (2d DCA Fla. 2008)("Even under HIPAA, ..., if the records are produced during normal discovery they are typically produced in a manner that restricts the persons who may access the documents and requires their return at the end of the litigation. See 45 C.F.R. §164.512(e).").
+
+In production request no. 23, Plaintiff seeks — "All documents referring to or relating to Jeffrey Epstein's purchase or consumption of prescription medicine." On its face, this production request is over broad and seeks non-relevant information. For example,
+
+whether or not EPSTEIN takes prescription medicine for (purely as an example and for argument) blood pressure or cholesterol control has absolutely no relevance to this action.
+
+Accordingly, EPSTEIN's objections to interrogatory no. 8 and production request no. 23 are required to be upheld. Plaintiff is not entitled to carte blanche discovery of Defendant's medical information.
+
+# C. Overbroad. relevance obiections to discovery.
+
+As to Plaintiffs argument regarding Defendant's objections based on relevancy and the over-breadth of Plaintiffs discovery requests, (Part VI. A, pp. 10-11, of ¶'s Motion To Compel), in her motion Plaintiff represents that she is seeking the discovery for a time period beginning January 1, 2003 to the present. As to interrogatory nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, and 12, Defendant disagrees that time period proposed by Plaintiff is reasonable. Plaintiffs complaint alleges that the conduct involving her took place in 2004-05. The scope and breadth of these interrogatories evidences that information sought has absolutely no relevance and is not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. The same is true for production request nos. 5, 6, 7, 10, 11, 18, 20, 21, 22, and 23. As discussed more fully below, the length of the time period, along with the scope and breadth of the information and items sought, makes such requests improper under the rules governing discovery.
+
+Without waiving any of the other alternative and additional objections asserted, Defendant does not disagree with the time period of January 1, 2003 to present as to interrogatory nos. 13, 14, 15, 16, and 17; and production request nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 14, 15, 16, and 17. Defendant addresses the additional alternative objections below.
+
+Plaintiffs motion to compel fails to address each of the discovery requests on an individual basis with respect to the objections asserted. A reading of each of the discovery requests, set forth above herein, establishes that each of the interrogatories and production requests is overbroad on its face and, thus, seeks non-relevant information. All of the interrogatories and production requests are phrased such that they encompass "all persons," "all Employees," "all telephone numbers," "all documents," "any and all," and so on. Contrary to Plaintiffs assertion, the definition of "employee" is on its face over broad and encompasses non-relevant information. (pp. 11-12 of Plaintiffs motion). Plaintiff should be required to restrict the information that is sought to the issues relevant to this action and the claims asserted by her and defenses to those claims.
+
+# D. Work Product; Attorney Client Privilege
+
+Plaintiff asserts that Defendant failed to provide a privilege log in asserting his objections based on attorney-client and work product privileges to interrogatories nos. 13, 14, and 17, and production requests nos. 4 - 8 and 10 - 23. First, a reading of the particular discovery requests reveals that the encompass attorney-client and work product privileged material. Secondly, as set forth above herein, in being compelled to create a privileged log is in essence compelled testimony to which Defendant's constitutional protections would apply. Again, as stated previously, it makes judicial sense to decide the constitutional issues first, before deciding the additional objections to the discovery requests.
+
+## E. Rules 408 and 410. Fed. Evid. Code; 490.410, Fla. Stat - Production requests nos. 1 — 5.
+
+Production requests nos. 1 — 5 set forth above herein, all pertain to the negotiation and eventual entering into of a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with the United States Attorney's Office (USAO) for the Southern District of Florida. See part I above herein. Again, the constitutional issues raised in Defendant's response permeate these discovery requests. The full text of Federal Evidence Rules 408 and 410, and Florida Statute §90.410, are set forth in endnote 3.3 Under the protections afforded by these evidentiary rules such documents are not subject to discovery.
+
+# F. Third Party Privacy Rights
+
+In production requests nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 11, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, and 22, Defendant has raised the additional objection that the privacy rights of third parties are implicated. See specified requests. As noted by the United States Supreme Court in Eisenstadt v. Baird, 405 U.S. 438, 454, 92 S.Ct. 1029, 1038, at fn. 10 (1972):
+
+In Stanley, 394 U.S., at 564, 89 S.Ct., at 1247, the Court stated:I(A)Iso fundamental is the right to be free, except in very limited circumstances, from unwanted governmental intrusions into one's privacy." The makers of our Constitution undertook to secure conditions favorable to the pursuit of happiness. They recognized the significance of man's spiritual nature, of his feelings and of his intellect. They knew that only a part of the pain, pleasure and satisfactions of life are to be found in material things. They sought to protect Americans in their beliefs, their thoughts, their emotions, and their sensations. They conferred, as against the Government, the right to be let alone-the most comprehensive of rights and the right most valued by civilized man.' [Citations omitted].
+
+The fundamental right of privacy is not only guaranteed under by the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution, but also under the Constitution of the State of Florida, Art. I, Sect. 23. As summarized by the Florida Supreme Court in Shaktman v. State 553 So.2d 148, 150-51 (Fla. 1989):
+
+The right of privacy, assured to Florida's citizens, demands that individuals be free from uninvited observation of or interference in those aspects of their lives which fall within the ambit of this zone of privacy unless the intrusion is
+
+> warranted by the necessity of a compelling state interest. In an opinion which predated the adoption of section 23, the First District aptly characterized the nature of this right.
+
+A fundamental aspect of personhood's integrity is the power to control what we shall reveal about our intimate selves, to whom, and for what purpose.
+
+Bryon, Harless, Schaffer, Reid & Assocs., Inc. v. State ex rel, Schellenberg, 360 So.2d 83, 92 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978), quashed and remanded on other grounds, 379 So.2d 633 (Fla.1980). Because this power is exercised in varying degrees by differing individuals, the parameters of an individual's privacy can be dictated only by that individual. The central concern is the inviolability of one's own thought, person, and personal action. The inviolability of that right assures its preeminence over "majoritarian sentiment" and thus cannot be universally defined by consensus.
+
+(Emphasis added).
+
+Clearly, the nature of the questions and production requests identified would require EPSTEIN to identify third parties and necessarily thwart such individuals' rights to assert their constitutional right of privacy as guaranteed under the United States and Florida Constitutions. See generally Eisenstadt v. Baird, supra at 454-455 (The right encompasses privacy in one's sexual matters and is not limited to the marital relationship.).
+
+# Ill. Conclusion
+
+Under applicable law and the facts and circumstances of this case, Defendant's assertions of his constitutional privileges and guarantees are required to be upheld. To rule otherwise would render EPSTEIN's constitutional protections meaningless. Also, the constitution issues so permeate this action that this Court should first decide those issues before deciding the merits of any additional objections raised by EPSTEIN. EPSTEIN is between the proverbial "rock and a hard place" in asserting is constitutional guarantees and then being compelled to make factual arguments regarding the
+
+application of his additional objections. EPSTEIN's additional objections as discussed herein are also required to be upheld.
+
+WHEREFORE Defendant requests that this Court deny Plaintiff's motion to compel and uphold EPSTEIN's assertion of his constitutional protections and, in the alternative or in addition to, uphold his additional objections to Plaintiff's discovery requests.
+
+![]()**Certificate of Service**
+
+I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record identified on the following Service List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on this 25<sup>th</sup> day of March, 2009:
+
+Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq.  
+Adam D. Horowitz, Esq.  
+Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A.  
+18205 Biscayne Boulevard  
+Suite 2218  
+Miami, FL 33160  
+305-931-2200  
+Fax: 305-931-0877  
+ssm@sexabuseattorney.com  
+ahorowitz@sexabuseattorney.com  
+Counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe #3
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger  
+Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.  
+250 Australian Avenue South  
+Suite 1400  
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012  
+561-659-8300  
+Fax: 561-835-8691  
+iagesq@bellsouth.net  
+Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
+
+![]()![]()
+> West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561/842-2820 Phone 561/515-3148 Fax (Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein)
+
+Part I. Crimes
+
+Chapter 117. Transportation for Illegal Sexual Activity and Related Crimes
+
+#### § 2422. Coercion and enticement
+
+(a) Whoever knowingly persuades, induces, entices, or coerces any individual to travel in interstate or foreign commerce, or in any Territory or Possession of the United States, to engage in prostitution, or in any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense, or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.
+
+(b) Whoever, using the mail or any facility or means of interstate or foreign commerce, or within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States knowingly persuades, induces, entices, or coerces any individual who has not attained the age of 18 years, to engage in prostitution or any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense, or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title and imprisoned not less than 10 years or for life.
+
+2006 Amendments. Subsec. (b). Pub.L. 109-248, § 203, struck out "not less than 5 years and not more than 30 years" and inserted "not less than 10 years or for life".
+
+2003 Amendments. Subsec. (a). Pub.L. 108-21, § 103(a)(2)(A), struck out "10" and inserted "20".
+
+Subsec. (b). Pub.L. 108-21, § 103(a)(2)(B), struck out "15" and inserted "30".
+
+Pub.L. 108-21, § 103(b)(2)(A)(i), struck out ", imprisoned" and inserted "and imprisoned not less than 5 years and".
+
+Pub.L. 108-21, § 103(b)(2)(A)(ii), struck out °, or both" at end of subsec. (b).
+
+The privileged quality of communication between husband and wife and between any professional person and his or her patient or client, and any other privileged communication except that between attorney and client or the privilege provided in s. 90.505, as such communication relates both to the competency of the witness and to the exclusion of confidential communications, shall not apply to any communication involving the perpetrator or alleged perpetrator in any situation involving known or suspected child abuse, abandonment, or neglect and shall not constitute grounds for failure to report as required by s. 39.201 regardless of the source of the information requiring the report, failure to cooperate with law enforcement or the department in its activities pursuant to this chapter, or
+
+<sup>&#</sup>x27; Title 18. Crimes and Criminal Procedure</p><p><sup>2</sup> 39.204. Abrogation of privileged communications in cases involving child abuse, abandonment, or neglect</p><p block-type='Text'>failure to give evidence in any judicial proceeding relating to child abuse, abandonment, or neglect.</p><p block-type='Text'>(Emphasis added).</p><p block-type='Text'>3 Relevancy and Its Limits</p><h3>Rule 408. Compromise and Offers to Compromise</h3><p block-type='Text'>(a) Prohibited uses.—Evidence of the following is not admissible on behalf of any party, when offered to prove liability for, invalidity of, or amount of a claim that was disputed as to validity or amount, or to impeach through a prior inconsistent statement or contradiction:</p><p block-type='Text'>(1) furnishing or offering or promising to furnish—or accepting or offering or promising to accept a valuable consideration in compromising or attempting to compromise the claim; and</p><p block-type='Text'>(2) conduct or statements made in compromise negotiations regarding the claim, except when offered in a criminal case and the negotiations related to a claim by a public office or agency in the exercise of regulatory, investigative, or enforcement authority.</p><p block-type='Text'>(b) Permitted uses.—This rule does not require exclusion if the evidence is offered for purposes not prohibited by subdivision (a). Examples of permissible purposes include proving a witness&#x27;s bias or prejudice; negating a contention of undue delay; and proving an effort to obstruct a criminal investigation or prosecution.</p><p block-type='Text'>CREDIT(S)</p><p block-type='Text'>(Pub.L. 93-595, § 1, Jan. 2, 1975, 88 Stat. 1933; Apr. 12, 2006, eff. Dec. 1, 2006).</p><h2>Rule 410. Inadmissibility of Pleas, Plea Discussions, and Related Statements</h2><p block-type='Text'>Except as otherwise provided in this rule, evidence of the following is not, in any civil or criminal proceeding, admissible against the defendant who made the plea or was a participant in the plea discussions:</p><p block-type='Text'>(1) a plea of guilty which was later withdrawn;</p><p block-type='Text'>(2) a plea of nob contendere;</p><p block-type='Text'>(3) any statement made in the course of any proceedings under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure or comparable state procedure regarding either of the foregoing pleas; or</p><p block-type='Text'>(4) any statement made in the course of plea discussions with an attorney for the prosecuting authority which do not result in a plea of guilty or which result in a plea of guilty later withdrawn.</p><p block-type='Text'>However, such a statement is admissible (i) in any proceeding wherein another statement made in the course of the same plea or plea discussions has been introduced and the statement ought in fairness be considered contemporaneously with it, or (ii) in a criminal proceeding for perjury or false statement if the statement was made by the defendant under oath, on the record and in the presence of counsel.</p><h1>CREDIT(S)</h1><p block-type='Text'>(Pub.L. 93-595, § 1, Jan. 2, 1975, 88 Stat. 1933; Pub.L. 94-149, § 1(9), Dec. 12, 1975, 89 Stat. 805; Apr. 30, 1979, eff. Dec. 1, 1980.)</p><h2>Florida Evidence Code</h2><h1>90.410. Offer to plead guilty; nolo contendere; withdrawn pleas of guilty</h1><p block-type='Text'>Evidence of a plea of guilty, later withdrawn; a plea of nob contendere; or an offer to plead guilty or nob contendere to the crime charged or any other crime is inadmissible in any civil or criminal proceeding. Evidence of statements made in connection with any of the pleas or offers is inadmissible, except when such statements are offered in a prosecution under chapter 837.</p><h1>CREDIT(S)</h1><p block-type='Text'>Laws 1976, c. 76-237, § 1; Laws 1978, c. 78-361, § 8.</p>
+ </body>
+</html></sup>
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739569/EFTA02739569.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739569/EFTA02739569.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..32f3fb2387bb52aca3de26a6579f3dff06231143
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739569/EFTA02739569.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,1896 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739569.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 36,
+  "chars": 74250,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 12.77,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            198.9399871826172,
+            71.0474853515625
+          ],
+          [
+            406.36800000000005,
+            71.0474853515625
+          ],
+          [
+            406.36800000000005,
+            99.53997802734375
+          ],
+          [
+            198.9399871826172,
+            99.53997802734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO \nCOMPEL ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES, and RESPONSES TO \n1st and 2 nd PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, AND INCORPORATED \nMEMORANDUM OF LAW",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            101.42001342773438,
+            277.83000000000004
+          ],
+          [
+            502.45199999999994,
+            277.83000000000004
+          ],
+          [
+            502.45199999999994,
+            334.65997314453125
+          ],
+          [
+            101.42001342773438,
+            334.65997314453125
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Introduction",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            267.44399999999996,
+            512.7974853515625
+          ],
+          [
+            336.9685363769531,
+            512.7974853515625
+          ],
+          [
+            336.9685363769531,
+            527.4099731445312
+          ],
+          [
+            267.44399999999996,
+            527.4099731445312
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "A.",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            294.37199999999996,
+            375.9375
+          ],
+          [
+            310.901611328125,
+            375.9375
+          ],
+          [
+            310.901611328125,
+            390.54998779296875
+          ],
+          [
+            294.37199999999996,
+            390.54998779296875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Memorandum of Law Supporting Application of Constitutional Privileges",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            110.16,
+            400.95000000000005
+          ],
+          [
+            495.2235107421875,
+            400.95000000000005
+          ],
+          [
+            495.2235107421875,
+            416.04998779296875
+          ],
+          [
+            110.16,
+            416.04998779296875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Circuit Court, State of Florida, recently entered order upholding assertion of Fifth \nAmendment and constitutional based protections in response to discovery.",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 11,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            72.216,
+            347.49
+          ],
+          [
+            533.664,
+            347.49
+          ],
+          [
+            533.664,
+            375.53997802734375
+          ],
+          [
+            72.216,
+            375.53997802734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "B. Even if the Court were to agree with Plaintiffs assertion that Defendant has \nasserted a \"blank privilege\" under the Fifth Amendment, under the facts and \ncircumstances of this case, such assertion would be proper.",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 12,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            87.11000061035156,
+            70.66748046875
+          ],
+          [
+            518.3639999999999,
+            70.66748046875
+          ],
+          [
+            518.3639999999999,
+            110.77996826171875
+          ],
+          [
+            87.11000061035156,
+            110.77996826171875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "D. Plaintiffs Amended First Set of Interrogatories to Defendant",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 14,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            134.64000000000001,
+            375.84000000000003
+          ],
+          [
+            472.3707580566406,
+            375.84000000000003
+          ],
+          [
+            472.3707580566406,
+            390.80352783203125
+          ],
+          [
+            134.64000000000001,
+            390.80352783203125
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "E. Plaintiffs First Production Request To Defendant",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 19,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            162.792,
+            513.54
+          ],
+          [
+            443.1207580566406,
+            513.54
+          ],
+          [
+            443.1207580566406,
+            529.1835327148438
+          ],
+          [
+            162.792,
+            529.1835327148438
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "ii. Defendant's obiections made in addition to the constitutional based \nprotections are required to be upheld.",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 22,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            102.20400000000001,
+            513.54
+          ],
+          [
+            502.45199999999994,
+            513.54
+          ],
+          [
+            502.45199999999994,
+            541.1635131835938
+          ],
+          [
+            102.20400000000001,
+            541.1635131835938
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "A. Constitutional issues are required to be addressed first.",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 22,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            146.268,
+            552.4200000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            458.14263916015625,
+            552.4200000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            458.14263916015625,
+            567.0
+          ],
+          [
+            146.268,
+            567.0
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "B. Interrogatory No. 8, Production Request No. 23",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 23,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            169.524,
+            541.8900000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            433.8824462890625,
+            541.8900000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            433.8824462890625,
+            556.0670471191406
+          ],
+          [
+            169.524,
+            556.0670471191406
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "C. Overbroad. relevance obiections to discovery.",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 28,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            172.58399999999997,
+            236.7974853515625
+          ],
+          [
+            432.68399999999997,
+            236.7974853515625
+          ],
+          [
+            432.68399999999997,
+            251.91
+          ],
+          [
+            172.58399999999997,
+            251.91
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "D. Work Product; Attorney Client Privilege",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 29,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            189.72,
+            375.84000000000003
+          ],
+          [
+            416.7805480957031,
+            375.84000000000003
+          ],
+          [
+            416.7805480957031,
+            391.56353759765625
+          ],
+          [
+            189.72,
+            391.56353759765625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "E. Rules 408 and 410. Fed. Evid. Code; 490.410, Fla. Stat - Production \nrequests nos. 1 \u2014 5.",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 29,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            101.59200000000001,
+            649.6200000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            503.7546081542969,
+            649.6200000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            503.7546081542969,
+            678.0635147094727
+          ],
+          [
+            101.59200000000001,
+            678.0635147094727
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "F. Third Party Privacy Rights",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 30,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            211.14,
+            263.25
+          ],
+          [
+            369.2332458496094,
+            263.25
+          ],
+          [
+            369.2332458496094,
+            279.54998779296875
+          ],
+          [
+            211.14,
+            279.54998779296875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Ill. Conclusion",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 31,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            261.936,
+            498.96
+          ],
+          [
+            342.93292236328125,
+            498.96
+          ],
+          [
+            342.93292236328125,
+            514.6699829101562
+          ],
+          [
+            261.936,
+            514.6699829101562
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Certificate of Service",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 32,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            261.324,
+            277.83000000000004
+          ],
+          [
+            383.724,
+            277.83000000000004
+          ],
+          [
+            383.724,
+            291.6
+          ],
+          [
+            261.324,
+            291.6
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "\u00a7 2422. Coercion and enticement",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 33,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            66.93000793457031,
+            204.040283203125
+          ],
+          [
+            242.964,
+            204.040283203125
+          ],
+          [
+            242.964,
+            217.43701171875
+          ],
+          [
+            66.93000793457031,
+            217.43701171875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Rule 408. Compromise and Offers to Compromise",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 34,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            66.3800048828125,
+            175.76999999999998
+          ],
+          [
+            331.70400000000006,
+            175.76999999999998
+          ],
+          [
+            331.70400000000006,
+            189.677001953125
+          ],
+          [
+            66.3800048828125,
+            189.677001953125
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Rule 410. Inadmissibility of Pleas, Plea Discussions, and Related Statements",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 34,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            66.76000213623047,
+            442.26000000000005
+          ],
+          [
+            471.419677734375,
+            442.26000000000005
+          ],
+          [
+            471.419677734375,
+            456.3070373535156
+          ],
+          [
+            66.76000213623047,
+            456.3070373535156
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CREDIT(S)",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 35,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            68.47000122070312,
+            95.58
+          ],
+          [
+            128.51999999999998,
+            95.58
+          ],
+          [
+            128.51999999999998,
+            111.3070068359375
+          ],
+          [
+            68.47000122070312,
+            111.3070068359375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Florida Evidence Code",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 35,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            68.544,
+            147.42000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            183.6,
+            147.42000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            183.6,
+            162.3070068359375
+          ],
+          [
+            68.544,
+            162.3070068359375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "90.410. Offer to plead guilty; nolo contendere; withdrawn pleas of guilty",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 35,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            68.544,
+            159.57000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            446.76,
+            159.57000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            446.76,
+            174.68701171875
+          ],
+          [
+            68.544,
+            174.68701171875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CREDIT(S)",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 35,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            68.47000122070312,
+            247.04999999999998
+          ],
+          [
+            128.51999999999998,
+            247.04999999999998
+          ],
+          [
+            128.51999999999998,
+            262.43701171875
+          ],
+          [
+            68.47000122070312,
+            262.43701171875
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            64
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            57
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            29
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            57
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            55
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            58
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            69
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            91
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            37
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            14
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            69
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            31
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 9,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            67
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            29
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 10,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            55
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 11,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            59
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 12,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            65
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            29
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 13,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            67
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            29
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 14,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            65
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            30
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 15,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            93
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            43
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            11
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 16,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            65
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            30
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 17,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 18,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 19,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            61
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            29
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 20,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            84
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            41
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            13
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 21,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            79
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            38
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 22,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            66
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            29
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 23,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            63
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            29
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 24,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            68
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            34
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 25,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            79
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            35
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 26,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            69
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            32
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 27,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            58
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 28,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            55
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 29,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 30,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            75
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            34
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 31,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            71
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            33
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 32,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            18
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 33,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            85
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            42
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 34,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            75
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            38
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            16
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 35,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            29
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            15
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739569"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739605/EFTA02739605.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739605/EFTA02739605.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..55e925c113cac33035a669e8519c4023d7ddc66a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739605/EFTA02739605.md
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+A TRUE BILL 6'6
+
+IN THE NAME OF AND BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
+
+IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
+
+For Palm Beach County, at the Spring Term thereof, in the year of our Lord Two Thousand and Six, to-wit: The Grand Jurors of the Slate of Florida, inquiring in and for the body of said County of Palm Beach, upon their oaths do present that JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN in the County of Palm Beach aforesaid, in the Circuit and State aforesaid,
+
+## COUNT ONE FELONY SOLICITATION OF PROSTITUTION
+
+on or about or between the 1st day of August in the year of our Lord Two Thousand and Four and October 31, 2005, did solicit, induce, entice, or procure another to commit prostitution lewdness, or assignation, contrary to Florida Statute 796.07(1) on three or more occasions between August 01, 2004 and October 31, 2005, contrary to Florida Statute 796.07(2)(f) and (4)(c). (3 DEG FEL)(LEVEL 1)
+
+against the form of the statute, to the evil example of all others, and against the peace and dignity of the State of Florida.
+
+<sup>I</sup>hereby certify that I have advised the Grand Jury returning this indictment as authorized and required by law.
+
+Assistant Staie ?hftfrriay of ttis-- Fifteenth Judicial Circuit of the State of Florida, prosecuting for the said State
+
+GRAND JURY FOREPERSON DATE
+
+Jeffrey E. Epstein, Race: , Sex: Male, DOB: January 20, 1953, SS#: 090-44.3348; Issue Warrant
+
+EXHIBIT
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739605/EFTA02739605.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739605/EFTA02739605.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5f82b0230934ec1cbce50086492afd51d0ff7998
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739605/EFTA02739605.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739605.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 1,
+  "chars": 1442,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 0.78,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "INDICTMENT",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            247.86,
+            34.83
+          ],
+          [
+            356.4181213378906,
+            34.83
+          ],
+          [
+            356.4181213378906,
+            51.84
+          ],
+          [
+            247.86,
+            51.84
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "COUNT ONE \nFELONY SOLICITATION OF PROSTITUTION",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            178.704,
+            259.20000000000005
+          ],
+          [
+            412.940185546875,
+            259.20000000000005
+          ],
+          [
+            412.940185546875,
+            287.54999999999995
+          ],
+          [
+            178.704,
+            287.54999999999995
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            289
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            13
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739605"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739606/EFTA02739606.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739606/EFTA02739606.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5ec56fd57e9fdfee30ababbf3959e1853937323c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739606/EFTA02739606.md
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+## AFFIDAVIT OF JACK A. GOLDBERGER, ESQUIRE
+
+STATE OF FLORIDA ) SS COUNTY OF PALM BEACH )
+
+BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, personally appeared having personal knowledge and being duly sworn, deposes and says:
+
+1. I, Jack A. Goldberger, have personal knowledge of the matters set forth herein. I am an attorney licensed to practice in the State of Florida since 1978. I am a partner with the law firm of Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A., located at One Clearlake Centre, Suite 1400, 250 Australian Avenue South, West Palm Beach, FL 33401.
+
+2. My practice includes and specializes in the defense of criminal matters. I am board certified in criminal law. I have been and currently am the criminal defense attorney for JEFFREY EPSTEIN.
+
+3. I represented Mr. EPSTEIN in the negotiation of and entering into a Non-Prosecution Agreement with the United States Attorney's Office (USAO) for the Federal Southern District of Florida. The terms and conditions of the Non-Prosecution Agreement also entailed the entering of a Plea Agreement with the State Attorney's Office, Palm Beach County, State of Florida. (The Non-Prosecution Agreement shall hereinafter be referred to as the "NPA").
+
+4. By its terms, the NPA took effect on June 30, 2008. Also, pursuant to the terms of the NPA, any criminal prosecution against EPSTEIN is deferred as long as the terms and conditions of the NPA are fulfilled by EPSTEIN.
+
+EXHIBIT
+
+5. The criminal matters against EPSTEIN remain ongoing until the NPA expires by its terms in late 2010 and as long as the USAO determines EPSTEIN has complied with those terms and conditions. The threat of criminal prosecution against EPSTEIN by USAO in the Southern District of Florida continues presently and through late 2010.
+
+6. Pursuant to the terms of the NPA, the USAO possesses the right to declare that the agreement has been breached, give EPSTEIN's counsel notice, and attempt to move forward with a prosecution. As of the date of this Affidavit, the USAO has taken the position on a number of occasions that it might consider the following actions by EPSTEIN to be a breach of the NPA.
+
+- Investigation by EPSTEIN (by and through his attorneys) of this Plaintiff and the other Plaintiffs in other pending civil cases for purposes of defending the civil actions;
+- EPSTEIN's contesting damages in this action and other civil actions.
+- EPSTEIN or his legal representatives making statements to the press about this Plaintiff or the other Plaintiffs.
+- Using the word "jail" instead of "imprisonment" in the plea agreement with the Palm Beach County State Attorney's Office.
+
+7. EPSTEIN, through counsel, submitted a Freedom of Information Act request to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) for documents relating to this and the other cases; the FBI denied the request stating the materials are at this time exempt from disclosure because they are in an investigative file, i.e. the matter is still an ongoing criminal investigation.
+
+8. The NPA expires in late 2010.
+
+FURTHER THE AFFIANT SAYETH NAUGHT
+
+![]()STATE OF FLORIDA  
+COUNTY OF PALM BEACH
+
+I hereby Certify that on this day, before me, an officer duly authorized to administer oaths and take acknowledgments, personally appeared Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire, known to me to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing Affidavit, who acknowledged before me that he/she executed the same, that I relied upon the following form of identification of the above named person: Known Personally, and that an oath was/was not taken.
+
+WITNESS my hand and official seal in the County and State last aforesaid this 19<sup>th</sup> day of February, 2009.
+
+(SEARCHED)
+
+![](_page_2_Picture_95.jpeg)
+
+![]()PRINT NAME: KLUE ROSIN  
+NOTARY PUBLIC/STATE OF FLORIDA  
+COMMISSION NO.: DD 489790  
+MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: 11/13/2009
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739606/EFTA02739606.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739606/EFTA02739606.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..97168ccd5a36047dd1b6b0742280550951c0a483
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739606/EFTA02739606.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,168 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739606.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 3,
+  "chars": 3820,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 4.49,
+  "image_assets": [
+    "_page_2_Picture_95.jpeg"
+  ],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "AFFIDAVIT OF JACK A. GOLDBERGER, ESQUIRE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            156.06,
+            74.0675048828125
+          ],
+          [
+            446.2628479003906,
+            74.0675048828125
+          ],
+          [
+            446.2628479003906,
+            89.04998779296875
+          ],
+          [
+            156.06,
+            89.04998779296875
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            49
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            23
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            18
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "Picture",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739606"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739606/_page_2_Picture_95.jpeg b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739606/_page_2_Picture_95.jpeg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..dfbbf8fee3ab7128e577da9c2cfebd896c95fa23
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739606/_page_2_Picture_95.jpeg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:1094ead7acaf4b0223c9c5f03997ebfa3282d907f5c955e1d4bc824a207797a9
+size 9657
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739609/EFTA02739609.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739609/EFTA02739609.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9a33f92d38ab59782fca3a1ff067549354db7b40
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739609/EFTA02739609.md
@@ -0,0 +1,317 @@
+*Original  
+Plaintiff*
+
+**UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT  
+SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA**
+
+**CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA-[REDACTED]**
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+v.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+\_\_\_\_\_/
+
+**DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE & OBJECTIONS  
+TO PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES**
+
+Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, by and through his undersigned attorneys, serves his responses and objections to Plaintiff's December 9, 2008 Amended First Set Of Interrogatories To Defendant Jeffrey Epstein, attached hereto.
+
+**Certificate of Service**
+
+I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing has been sent by fax and U.S. Mail to the following addressees this 26<sup>th</sup> day of January, 2009:
+
+Adam D. Horowitz, Esq.  
+Jeffrey Marc Herman, Esq.  
+Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq.  
+18205 Biscayne Boulevard  
+Suite 2218  
+Miami, FL 33160  
+305-931-2200  
+Fax: 305-931-0877  
+ahorowitz@hermanlaw.com  
+iherman@hermanlaw.com  
+lrivera@hermanlaw.com  
+*Counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe #3*
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger  
+Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.  
+250 Australian Avenue South  
+Suite 1400  
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012  
+561-659-8300  
+Fax: 561-835-8691  
+jagesq@bellsouth.net  
+*Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein*
+
+*COMPOSITE EXHIBIT "C"*
+
+*Jeffrey Epstein  
+Attorney for Plaintiff  
+cc-JE, V6.1.05*
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+![]()MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ.  
+Florida Bar #617296  
+mpike@bclclaw.com
+
+BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN  
+515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400  
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401  
+561/842-2820 Phone  
+561/515-3148 Fax
+
+(Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein)
+
+#### DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S ANSWERS AND OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES
+
+Interrogatory No. 1. Identify all employees who performed work of services inside the Palm Beach Residence.
+
+Answer: Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the interrogatories as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any questions relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, Defendant objects as the interrogatory is overbroad and seeks information that is neither relevant to the subject matter of the pending action nor does it appear reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Plaintiffs Complaint alleges a time period of "in or about 2004-2005." Plaintiffs interrogatory seeks information for a time period from January 1, 2003 until present. Also, see "Employee" as defined in paragraph g of Plaintiffs interrogatories.
+
+Interrogatory No. 2. Identify all Employees not identified in response to interrogatory no. 1 who at any time came to Defendant's Palm Beach Residence.
+
+Answer: Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the interrogatories as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any questions relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, Defendant objects as the interrogatory is overbroad and seeks information that is neither relevant to the subject matter of the pending action nor does it appear reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Plaintiffs Complaint alleges a time period of "in or about 2004-2005." Plaintiffs interrogatory seeks information for "all Employees" "who at any time" came to the residence. Also, see "Employee" as defined in paragraph g of Plaintiffs interrogatories.
+
+Interrogatory No. 3. Identify all persons who came to the Palm Beach Residence and who gave a massage or were asked to give <sup>a</sup>massage to Defendant.
+
+Answer: Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the interrogatories as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any questions relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, Defendant objects as the interrogatory is overbroad and seeks information that is neither relevant to the subject matter of the pending action nor does it appear reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Plaintiffs Complaint alleges a time period of "in or about 2004-2005."
+
+Interrogatory No. 4. Identify all persons who came to the New York Residence and who gave a massage or were asked to give <sup>a</sup>massage to Defendant.
+
+Answer: Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the interrogatories as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any questions relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, Defendant objects as the interrogatory is overbroad and seeks information that is neither relevant to the subject matter of the pending action nor does it appear reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Plaintiffs Complaint alleges a time period of "in or about 2004-2005."
+
+Interrogatory No. 5. Identify all persons who came to the New Mexico Residence and who gave a massage or were asked to give <sup>a</sup>massage to Defendant.
+
+Answer: Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the interrogatories as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any questions relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my
+
+federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, Defendant objects as the interrogatory is overbroad and seeks information that is neither relevant to the subject matter of the pending action nor does it appear reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Plaintiff's Complaint alleges a time period of "in or about 2004-2005."
+
+**Interrogatory No. 6.** Identify all persons who came to the St. [REDACTED] Residence and who gave a massage or were asked to give a massage to Defendant.
+
+**Answer:** Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the interrogatories as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any questions relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, Defendant objects as the interrogatory is overbroad and seeks information that is neither relevant to the subject matter of the pending action nor does it appear reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Plaintiff's Complaint alleges a time period of "in or about 2004-2005."
+
+**Interrogatory No. 7.** List all the time periods during which Jeffrey Epstein was present in the State of Florida, including for each the date he arrive and the date he departed.
+
+**Answer:** Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the interrogatories as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any questions relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, Defendant also objects as the interrogatory is overbroad and seeks information that is neither relevant to the subject matter of the pending action nor does it appear reasonably calculated to lead to the
+
+discovery of admissible evidence. Plaintiff's Complaint alleges a time period of "in or about 2004-2005." Plaintiff's interrogatory seeks information for a time period from January 1, 2003 until present.
+
+**Interrogatory No. 8.** Identify all of Jeffrey Epstein health care providers in the past (10) ten years, including without limitation, psychologists, psychiatrists, mental health counselors, physicians, hospitals and treatment facilities.
+
+**Answer:** Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the interrogatories as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any questions relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, Defendant also objects as the interrogatory is overbroad and seeks information that is neither relevant to the subject matter of the pending action nor does it appear reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. In addition, such information is privileged pursuant to Rule 501, Fed. Evid., and §90.503, Fla.Evid. Code. In addition, such information is protected by the provisions of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA).
+
+**Interrogatory No. 9.** List all items in Jeffrey Epstein's possession in Palm Beach, Florida, at any time during the period of these interrogatories, which were used or intended to be used as sexual aids, sex toys, massage aids, and/or vibrators, and for each, list the manufacturer, model number (if applicable), and its present location.
+
+**Answer:** Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the interrogatories as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any questions relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, Defendant also objects as the interrogatory is overbroad and seeks information that is neither relevant to the subject matter of the pending action nor does it appear reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Plaintiff's Amended Complaint alleges a time period of "in or about 2004 – 2005," while Plaintiff's interrogatory seeks information from
+
+January 1, 2003, until present. Further, the request is meant to embarrass and harass the Defendant.
+
+Interrogatory No. 10. Identify all persons who provide transportation services to Jeffrey Epstein, whether as employees or independent contractors, including without limitation, chauffeurs and aircraft crew.
+
+Answer: Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the interrogatories as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any questions relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, Defendant also objects as the interrogatory is overbroad and seeks information that is neither relevant to the subject matter of the pending action nor does it appear reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Plaintiff places no time limitation.
+
+Interrogatory No. 11. Identify all telephone numbers used by Epstein, including cellular phones and land lines in any of his residences, by stating the complete telephone number and the name of the service provider.
+
+Answer: Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the interrogatories as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any questions relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, Defendant also objects as the interrogatory is overbroad and seeks information that is neither relevant to the subject matter of the pending action nor does it appear reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Plaintiffs allegations claim a time period of "in or about 2004-2005" and involve Defendant's Palm Beach residence.
+
+Interrogatory No. 12. Identify all telephone numbers of employees of Epstein, used in the course or scope of their employment, including cellular phones and land lines in any of his residences, by stating the complete telephone number and the name of the service provider.
+
+**Answer:** Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the interrogatories as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any questions relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, Defendant objects as the interrogatory is overbroad and seeks information that is neither relevant to the subject matter of the pending action nor does it appear reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Plaintiff's allegations claim a time period of "in or about 2004-2005" and involve Defendant's Palm Beach residence.
+
+**Interrogatory No. 13.** List the names and addresses of all persons who are believed or known by your, your agents, or your attorneys to have any knowledge concerning any of the issues in this lawsuit; and specify the subject matter about which the witness has knowledge.
+
+**Answer:** Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the interrogatories as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any questions relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, the interrogatory seeks information that is attorney-client and work product privileged as it seeks information known by Defendant's attorneys. The interrogatory is so overbroad that Defendant cannot reasonably form a response, including the raising of additional privileges which may apply. Without waiving any objection, see Rule 26 disclosures made by Defendant's counsel in this case.
+
+**Interrogatory No. 14.** State the name and address of every person known to you, your agents, or your attorneys who has knowledge about, possession, or custody, or control of, any model, plat, map, drawing, motion picture, videotape or photograph pertaining to any fact or issue involved in this controversy; and describe as to each, what item such person has, the name and address of the person who took or prepared it, and the date it was taken or prepared.
+
+Answer: Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the interrogatories as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any questions relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, the interrogatory seeks information that is attorney-client and work product privileged as it seeks information known by Defendant's attorneys.
+
+Interrogatory No. 15. Identify all persons who have made aclaim, complaint, demand or threat against you relating to alleged sexual abuse or misconduct on <sup>a</sup>minor, and for each provide the following information:
+
+- a. The person's full name, last known address and telephone number;
+- b. The person's attorney, if represented;
+- c. The date of the alleged incident(s);
+- d. If a civil case has been filed by or on behalf of the person, the case number and identifying information.
+
+Answer: Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the interrogatories as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any questions relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges and without waiving such objection, with regard to subparagraph (d), Defendant's counsel states that such information is public record and equally attainable by Plaintiff.
+
+Interrogatory No. 16. State the facts upon which you intend to rely for each denial of a pleading allegation and for each affirmative defense you intend to make in these cases.
+
+Answer: Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the interrogatories as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any questions relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk
+
+losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, no answer to the Amended Complaint has been filed by defense counsel in this case; however, Defendant does not intend to waive his constitutional privilege against self-incrimination. Defendant further objects in that Plaintiff's interrogatory attempts to obtain discovery in other cases filed by her undersigned counsel.
+
+**Interrogatory No. 17.** Identify all witnesses from whom you have obtained or requested a written, transcribed or recorded statement relating to any issue in these cases, and for each, in addition to the witness's identifying information, state the date of the statement and identify the person taking the statement.
+
+**Answer:** Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the interrogatories as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any questions relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, Defendant objects to this interrogatory in that it seeks information that is attorney-client and work product privileged. In addition, the request is overbroad in that it seeks information "relating to any issue."
+
+![]()STATE OF Florida )  
+COUNTY OF Palm Beach )
+
+I hereby certify that on this day, before me, an officer duly authorized to administer oaths and take acknowledgments, personally appeared Jeffrey Epstein, known to me to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing Interrogatories who
+
+acknowledged before me that he/she executed the same, that I relied upon the following form of identification of the above-named person: personally known/identification and that an oath was/was not taken.
+
+WITNESS my hand and official seal in the County and State last aforesaid this 2.G \v, day of ''or'k,art1 , 2009.
+
+(SEAL)
+
+![](_page_10_Picture_5.jpeg)
+
+PRnt.' akArk.-.;( Notary Public/State oT Florida Commission #: My Commission Expires:
+
+*Original  
+pleased.*
+
+**UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT  
+SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA**
+
+**CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA [REDACTED]**
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+v.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+\_\_\_\_\_/
+
+**DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE & OBJECTIONS  
+TO PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION**
+
+Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, by and through his undersigned counsel, serves his responses and objections to Plaintiff's Amended First Request For Production To Defendant, dated December 9, 2008.
+
+**Request No. 1.** The list provided to you by the U.S. Attorney of individuals whom the U.S. Attorney was prepared to name in an Indictment as victims of an offense by Mr. Epstein enumerated in 18 U.S.C. §2255.
+
+**Response:** Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the production request as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to produce all relevant documents regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that at the present time I cannot select, authenticate, and produce documents relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference
+
+*CC: JG, JE, DI*
+
+under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, the information sought is privileged and confidential, and inadmissible pursuant to the terms of the deferred prosecution agreement, Fed. Rule of Evidence 410 and 408, and §90.410, Fla. Stat. Further, the request is overly broad, work product, attorney-client privileged, and confidential. In addition, the request seeks information concerning persons, not parties to this litigation, whose privacy rights are implicated.
+
+Request No. 2. All documents referring or relating to the United States' agreement with Defendant to defer federal prosecution subject to certain conditions, including without limitation, the operative agreement between Defendant and the United States and all amendments, revisions and supplements thereto.
+
+Response: Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the production request as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to produce all relevant documents regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that at the present time I cannot select, authenticate, and produce documents relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my
+
+constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, the information sought is privileged and confidential, and inadmissible pursuant to the terms of the deferred prosecution agreement, Fed. Rule of Evidence 410 and 408, and §90.410, Fla. Stat. Further, the request is overly broad, work product, attorney-client privileged, and confidential. In addition, the request seeks information concerning persons, not parties to this litigation, whose privacy rights are implicated.
+
+Request No. 3. All documents referring or relating to Defendant's agreement with the State of Florida on his plea of guilty to violations of Florida Criminal Statutes, including without limitation, the operative plea agreement and any amendments, revisions and supplements thereto.
+
+Response: Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the production request as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to produce all relevant documents regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that at the present time I cannot select, authenticate, and produce documents relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, the
+
+information sought is privileged and confidential, and inadmissible pursuant to the terms of the deferred prosecution agreement, Fed. Rule of Evidence 410 and 408, and §90.410, Fla. Stat. Further, the request is overly broad, work product, attorney-client privileged, and confidential. In addition, the request seeks information concerning persons, not parties to this litigation, whose privacy rights are implicated. Whatever public documents exist are in the State Court file and equally accessible to Plaintiff.
+
+Request No.4. All documents obtained in discovery or investigation relating to either the Florida Criminal Case or the Federal Criminal Case, including without limitation, documents obtained from any federal, state, or local law enforcement agency, the State Attorney's office and the United States Attorney's office.
+
+Response: Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the production request as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to produce all relevant documents regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that at the present time I cannot select, authenticate, and produce documents relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, the
+
+information sought is privileged and confidential, and inadmissible pursuant to the terms of the deferred prosecution agreement, Fed. Rule of Evidence 410 and 408, and §90.410, Fla. Stat. Further, the request is overly broad, work product, attorney-client privileged, and confidential. In addition, the request seeks information concerning persons, not parties to this litigation, whose privacy rights are implicated. Request No. 4 seeks documents that are attorney-client and work product privileged in that it seeks "all documents obtained in discovery or investigation relating either to the Florida Criminal Case or the Federal Criminal Case ... ." In addition, such documents are privileged and confidential as they are the subject of a pending investigation.
+
+Request No. 5. All telephone records and other documents reflecting telephone calls made by or to Defendant, including without limitation, telephone logs and message pads.
+
+Response: Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the production request as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to produce all relevant documents regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that at the present time I cannot select, authenticate, and produce documents relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the
+
+Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, the information sought is privileged and confidential, and inadmissible pursuant to the terms of the deferred prosecution agreement, Fed. Rule of Evidence 410 and 408, and §90.410, Fla. Stat. Further, the request is overly broad, work product, attorney-client privileged, and confidential. In addition, the request seeks information concerning persons, not parties to this litigation, whose privacy rights are implicated. Defendant objects as the request is overbroad and seeks information that is neither relevant to the subject matter of the pending action nor does it appear reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Plaintiffs complaint alleges a time period of "in or about 2004 — 2005." Plaintiffs request seeks information for a time period of January 1, 2003 until present regarding any and all telephone records and other documents reflecting any and all telephone calls made to or by Defendant. As phrased, the request includes attorney-client and work product privileged information, as well as records and documents of calls having absolutely no relationship to any of the allegations in this action.
+
+Request No. 6. All telephone records and other documents reflecting telephone calls made by or to Defendant, including without limitation, telephone logs and message pads, reflecting telephone calls made by or to employees.
+
+Response: Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the production request as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to produce all relevant documents regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that at the present time I cannot select, authenticate, and produce
+
+documents relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, the information sought is privileged and confidential, and inadmissible pursuant to the terms of the deferred prosecution agreement, Fed. Rule of Evidence 410 and 408, and §90.410, Fla. Stat. Further, the request is overly broad, work product, attorney-client privileged, and confidential. In addition, as defined by Plaintiff in paragraph g of her request, the term employee is overly broad and encompasses information that is neither relevant to the subject matter of the pending action nor does it appear reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Further, the request seeks information pertaining to person who are not parties to this action and whose privacy rights are implicated.
+
+Request No. 7. All surveillance videos, slides, film, videotape, digital recording or other audio or video depiction or image of the Palm Beach Residence.
+
+Response: Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the production request as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to produce all relevant documents regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that at the present time I cannot select, authenticate, and produce documents relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my
+
+Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, the information sought is privileged and confidential, and inadmissible pursuant to the terms of the deferred prosecution agreement, Fed. Rule of Evidence 410 and 408, and §90.410, Fla. Stat. Further, the request is overly broad, work product, attorney-client privileged, and confidential. In addition, the request seeks information concerning persons, not parties to this litigation, whose privacy rights are implicated. Plaintiffs complaint alleges a time period of "in or about 2004 — 2005." Plaintiffs request seeks information for a time period of January 1, 2003 until present regarding "all surveillance videos, etc., or image of the Palm Beach Residence."
+
+Request No. 8. All documents referring or relating to Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 2, including without limitation, web pages, social networking site pages, correspondence, videotapes and audiotapes.
+
+Response: Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the production request as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to produce all relevant documents regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that at the present time I cannot select, authenticate, and produce documents relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my
+
+Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, the information sought is privileged and confidential, and inadmissible pursuant to the terms of the deferred prosecution agreement, Fed. Rule of Evidence 410 and 408, and §90.410, Fla. Stat. Further, the request is overly broad, work product, attorney-client privileged, and confidential.
+
+Request No. 9. All statements taken, transcribed or recorded from any person referring or relating to Defendant's sexual conduct, massages given to Defendant or any issue in these cases.
+
+Response: Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the production request as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to produce all relevant documents regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that at the present time I cannot select, authenticate, and produce documents relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the
+
+Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, the information sought is privileged and confidential, and inadmissible pursuant to the terms of the deferred prosecution agreement, Fed. Rule of Evidence 410 and 408, and §90.410, Fla. Stat. Further, the request is overly broad, work product, attorney-client privileged, and confidential.
+
+Request No. 10. All documents referring to or relating to air travel and aircraft used by Defendant, including without limitation, flight logs and flight manifests.
+
+time period of January 1, 2003 until present regarding air travel and aircraft used by Defendant.
+
+Request No. 11. Any and all documents referring to or relating to modeling agencies, including but not limited to documents relating to or reflecting communications with female models.
+
+Request No. 12. All photographs, videotapes, digital images and other documents depicting or showing females who, at the time thereof, were under the age of 21, which were taken or created by or for Defendant and not intended for sale commercially to the public.
+
+Request No. 13. All photographs and painting of females which were displayed in any of Defendant's homes or residences in the time frame of these requests, including without limitation, photographs in standing or sitting frames or wall frames.
+
+Request No. 14. Any and all documents consisting of, referring or relating to communications between Jeffrey Epstein and including, but not limited to, letters, notes, text messages, messages on social networking sites, and e-mails.
+
+Request No. 15. Any and all documents consisting of, referring or relating to communications between Jeffrey Epstein and i, including, but not limited to, letters, notes, text messages, messages on social networking sites, and e-mails.
+
+Request No. 16. Any and all documents consisting of, referring or relating to communications between Jeffrey Epstein and MIMI= including, but not limited to, letters, notes, text messages, messages on social networking sites, and e-mails.
+
+Request No. 17. Any and all documents consisting of, referring or relating to communications between Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, including, but not limited to, letters, notes, text messages, messages on social networking sites, and e-mails.
+
+Request No. 18. Any and all documents and photographs placed by Defendant at any time in the period of these requests on a social networking website, including without limitation, Facebook.com and MySpace.com.
+
+Request No. 19. Any and all documents reflecting or consisting of communications between Jeffrey Epstein and MC2 Models or Jean-Luc Brunel, relating or referring to females coming into the United States from other countries to pursue a career in modeling, including, but not limited to, letters, notes and emails.
+
+2005." In addition, the request seeks documents pertaining to females who are not non-parties, and who possess privacy rights.
+
+Request No. 20. Any and all documents referring or relating to gifts or loans to females under the age of 21, including, but not limited to, notes, receipts and car rental agreements.
+
+Request No. 21. Any and all personal calendars or schedules of or for Jeffrey Epstein from January 1, 2003 to the present.
+
+Response: Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the production request as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to produce all relevant documents regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that at the present time I cannot select, authenticate, and produce documents relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, the information sought is privileged and confidential, and inadmissible pursuant to the terms of the deferred prosecution agreement, Fed. Rule of Evidence 410 and 408, and §90.410, Fla. Stat. Further, the request is overly broad, work product, attorney-client privileged, and confidential. In addition, the request seeks information concerning persons, not parties to this litigation, whose privacy rights are implicated. Plaintiffs complaint alleges a time period of "in or about 2004 — 2005." In addition, the request encompasses attorney-client privileged material.
+
+Request No. 22. All documents written by Jeffrey Epstein consisting of personal thoughts, feelings or descriptions of events, incidents or occurrences in Defendant's life, including without limitation, any diaries of Jeffrey Epstein.
+
+Response: Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the production request as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to produce all relevant documents regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that at the present time I cannot select, authenticate, and produce documents relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, the information sought is privileged and confidential, and inadmissible pursuant to the terms of the deferred prosecution agreement, Fed. Rule of Evidence 410 and 408, and §90.410, Fla. Stat. Further, the request is overly broad, work product, attorney-client privileged, and confidential. In addition, the request seeks information concerning persons, not parties to this litigation, whose privacy rights are implicated. Plaintiffs complaint alleges a time period of "in or about 2004 - 2005." On its fact, the request goes beyond the scope of allowable discovery and is meant to harass, embarrass and overburden the Defendant. Further, the request is so overly broad that it includes attorney-client and work product privileged materials.
+
+Request No. 23. All documents referring to or relating to Jeffrey Epstein's purchase or consumption of prescription medicine.
+
+**Certificate of Service**
+
+WE HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing has been sent via U.S. Mail and facsimile to the following addressees this 26th day of January, 2009.
+
+Adam D. Horowitz, Esq.  
+Jeffrey Marc Herman, Esq.  
+Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq.  
+18205 Biscayne Boulevard  
+Suite 2218  
+Miami, FL 33160  
+305-931-2200  
+Fax: 305-931-0877  
+[ahorowitz@hermanlaw.com](mailto:ahorowitz@hermanlaw.com)  
+[jherman@hermanlaw.com](mailto:jherman@hermanlaw.com)  
+[lrivera@hermanlaw.com](mailto:lrivera@hermanlaw.com)  
+*Counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe #3*
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger  
+Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.  
+250 Australian Avenue South  
+Suite 1400  
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012  
+561-659-8300  
+Fax: 561-835-8691  
+[jagesq@bellsouth.net](mailto:jagesq@bellsouth.net)  
+*Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein*
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+![]()*(Co-counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein)*
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739609/EFTA02739609.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739609/EFTA02739609.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..dfff4b2a107ac4f0644abfb45c4a3f5f618208f3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739609/EFTA02739609.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,1366 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739609.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 35,
+  "chars": 49139,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 15.85,
+  "image_assets": [
+    "_page_10_Picture_5.jpeg"
+  ],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            201.96000000000004,
+            81.81
+          ],
+          [
+            406.36800000000005,
+            81.81
+          ],
+          [
+            406.36800000000005,
+            108.53999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            201.96000000000004,
+            108.53999999999999
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE & OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            137.7,
+            291.6
+          ],
+          [
+            471.24,
+            291.6
+          ],
+          [
+            471.24,
+            319.14000000000004
+          ],
+          [
+            137.7,
+            319.14000000000004
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Certificate of Service",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            264.384,
+            413.90999999999997
+          ],
+          [
+            376.992,
+            413.90999999999997
+          ],
+          [
+            376.992,
+            426.87000000000006
+          ],
+          [
+            264.384,
+            426.87000000000006
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S ANSWERS AND OBJECTIONS TO \nPLAINTIFF'S AMENDED FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            121.17600000000002,
+            110.97
+          ],
+          [
+            488.7056884765625,
+            110.97
+          ],
+          [
+            488.7056884765625,
+            137.90362548828125
+          ],
+          [
+            121.17600000000002,
+            137.90362548828125
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 11,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            195.84,
+            78.57000000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            402.08400000000006,
+            78.57000000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            402.08400000000006,
+            106.11000000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            195.84,
+            106.11000000000001
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE & OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 11,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            113.22,
+            284.31
+          ],
+          [
+            484.70400000000006,
+            284.31
+          ],
+          [
+            484.70400000000006,
+            313.47
+          ],
+          [
+            113.22,
+            313.47
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Certificate of Service",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 34,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            241.12800000000001,
+            72.08999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            363.52799999999996,
+            72.08999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            363.52799999999996,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            241.12800000000001,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            213
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            39
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            486
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            35
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            529
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            36
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            505
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            37
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            500
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            39
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 9,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            411
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            36
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            14
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 10,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            129
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            17
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Picture",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 11,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            23
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 12,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 13,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 14,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 15,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 16,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 17,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 18,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 19,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 20,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            309
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 21,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            292
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 22,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 23,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            284
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 24,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 25,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 26,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 27,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 28,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 29,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            50
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 30,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 31,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 32,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            298
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 33,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 34,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            14
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739609"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739609/_page_10_Picture_5.jpeg b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739609/_page_10_Picture_5.jpeg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b48891f9f1eeec272a97cff491d32ca1c8e8f930
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739609/_page_10_Picture_5.jpeg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:5e7c66751f2f5cfb0975232b5f23603bc5ed3b468c7cfc293d1933981bf36311
+size 11898
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739644/EFTA02739644.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739644/EFTA02739644.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8860acdf97d94d0025bd06e05a3c24be3ed25a5d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739644/EFTA02739644.md
@@ -0,0 +1,153 @@
+#### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRAa
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+v.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+#### Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's Motion To Stay And Or Continue Action For Time Certain Based On Parallel Civil And Criminal Proceedings With Incorporated Memorandum Of Law
+
+Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, (hereinafter "EPSTEIN") by and through his undersigned attorneys, hereby moves this Court for the entry of an order staying or continuing this action for a time certain (i.e., until late 2010 when the NPA expires), pursuant to the application of the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and the fact that a parallel proceeding is ongoing and being investigated. In support of his motion, EPSTEIN states:
+
+### I. Introduction
+
+At the outset, EPSTEIN notes this Court's prior Order (DE 29), in which this Court denied a motion for stay brought by Defendant's prior counsel. In that instance, Defendant's counsel requested a mandatory stay under 18 U.S.C.A. §3509(k) which the court denied. In denying the request for the stay, this Court stated that a discretionary stay was not appropriate at the time the order was entered but also stated, in part, that "Any such issues shall be resolved as they arise in the course of litigation." As discussed herein, "special circumstances" now exist
+
+which, in the "interests of justice," merit the entry of a stay of this civil action until the criminal matter in the I5'h Judicial Circuit is "closed" in accordance with the United States Attorney's Office ("USAO") Non-Prosecution Agreement ("NPA") and until the NPA expires.
+
+Moreover, EPSTEIN was indicted by a grand jury in or around July 2006. See Exhibit "A". The Non-Prosecution Agreement is part of the record in connection with that indictment, which is signed by the State Attorney of the 15'h Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida ("SAO"). In fact, the NPA acknowledges the investigation performed by the SAO. Further, the USAO was present at the Plea hearing whereby the NPA was made part of the record. Thus, there is no question that a parallel criminal matter exists in that the SAO's case remains open and the NPA lives along side it, which places EPSTEIN under great scrutiny by the USAO. The NPA actually places an affirmative duty upon EPSTEIN to undertake discussions with the SAO to ensure compliance with the NPA. That check and balance, therefore, remains in the hands of the SAO, which has a parallel criminal proceeding. Here, the threat of prosecution is real, substantial, and present should the USAO determine that EPSTEIN somehow violated the NPA. As discussed below, because the NPA fails to define what constitutes a breach, the USAO has apparently taken it upon itself to determine whether a breach has occurred and whether to seek criminal prosecution. In fact, the USAO has already attempted to claim violations of the NPA due to, among other things, EPSTEIN defending the civil actions against him. Clearly, it is NOT simply EPSTEIN's choice as to whether he violates the NPA — that discretion apparently lies with the USAO. For this reason alone, a stay is required until the NPA expires.
+
+The difference between this Motion and the prior motion to stay is solely due to the ripeness of the issues discussed herein.
+
+# II. THE NPA
+
+By its terms, the NPA took effect on June 30, 2008 and expires by those same terms in late 2010 so long as EPSTEIN complies with the terms and conditions — violations of which remain undefined. The NPA, which remains under seal, outlines various obligations on the part of EPSTEIN including, but not limited to, pleading guilty to the Indictment and Information before the 15th Judicial Circuit, recommendations for his sentencing before the 15th Judicial Circuit, waiver of challenges to the Information filed by the SAO, waiver of right to appeal his conviction, agreement not be afforded benefits for gain time, and the agreement to not prosecute others listed thereon so long as EPSTEIN does not breach and fulfills the requirements of the NPA.
+
+What the NPA does not outline or define is what constitutes a breach or what act or omission constitutes a breach thereof. Therefore, the USAO apparently believes it has the discretion to make that unwritten and undefined determination, which places an unreasonable burden upon EPSTEIN in defending the civil claims in that he has no idea what the USAO will define as a breach in the event he does not assert his 5i° Amendment Rights. As an example, the USAO has already claimed that EPSTEIN violated the NPA by:
+
+- 1. investigating the Plaintiffs (by and though his attorneys) whom brought civil suits against him for purposes of defending those civil actions;
+  - 2. contesting damages in this action and in the other civil actions;
+- 3. making statements to the press about this Plaintiff or other Plaintiffs by and though his attorneys; and
+
+office. 4. using the word "jail" instead of "imprisonment" in the plea agreement with SA's
+
+See Exhibit "B" Goldberger Affidavit - EPSTEIN's criminal counsel.
+
+These allegations are silly, unfounded and alleged violations which are not defined as violations under the NPA but arrived at by the USAO. Thus, EPSTEIN is left with "Morton's Fork" in his side - the undesirable choice of taking the 5th Amendment and having a judgment (summary or otherwise) entered against him in the civil action or the undesirable choice of subjecting himself to discovery in the civil action before the NPA expires and, thus, face the possibility of criminal prosecution by the USAO based upon some illusory breach deemed by the USAO by way of information obtained through civil discovery proceedings. This is inherently unfair, the danger is clear, and the playing field is not level in light of the NPA language or lack thereof.
+
+As a result, the threat of criminal prosecution against EPSTEIN by the USAO continues presently and through late 2010.
+
+### Ill. Justice Requires The Entry of A Stay Because Defendant Is Being Forced To Choose Between Waiving His Sth Amendment Privilege Or Risk Losing This Civil Case And Forfeiting Other Constitutional Guarantees Of Due Process And Effective Assistance Of Counsel
+
+Once the NPA expires, EPSTEIN fully intends to testify to all relevant and nonobjectionable inquiries made to him in discovery be it a deposition, in interrogatories or in production requests. (Emphasis Added) However, the current circumstances are such that by testifying or responding to discovery, EPSTEIN will be required to waive his constitutional privileges, thereby subjecting himself to criminal prosecution and scrutiny by the USA() as a
+
+result of matters alleged in this civil action (and others before this Court and in the State of Florida 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County).
+
+The special circumstances of this action are such that a stay or continuance for a time certain is NOT prejudicial and is required to be entered so that:
+
+(1) EPSTEIN is not required to waive his Fifth Amendment right against selfincrimination under the United States Constitution resulting in severe prejudice to EPSTEIN in pending criminal matters; and
+
+(2) EPSTEIN is not forced to choose between waiving his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination or losing the civil case.
+
+Here, in asserting his Fifth Amendment Privilege, the Plaintiff is afforded an opportunity rarely given - that is, to put on only her evidence without any counterevidence from Defendant resulting in a judgment of liability against EPSTEIN. This is inherently unfair and precisely the special circumstances where "in the interests of justice" a stay is required. Ventura v. Broskv, 2006 WL 3392207 (S.D. Fla. 2006), citing, United States v. Lot 5, Fox Grove, 23 F.3d 359 ( I 11h Cir. 1994). In Ventura, a stay was entered where a Defendant was confronted with issue of waiving his 5th Amendment Privilege or to loose a civil case by way of motion for summary judgment. Id. Here, EPSTEIN is not requesting a mandatory stay. EPSTEIN only asks that this court recognize that "special circumstances" exists in this matter and enter a stay in the "interests of justice" and only for a specified period of time (i.e., after the NPA expires). See also Securities and Exchange Commission. 755 F.Supp. 1018, 1019 (S.D. Fla. 1990)(Defendant was in precarious position while being subject to criminal investigation and reasoning that compelling Defendant to speak by ordering an accounting of alleged illicit funds would directly
+
+impinge his right against self-incrimination). The court found it appropriate to grant the request for stay. (Emphasis Added).
+
+Citing to U.S. v. Lot 5, Fox Grove, supra, the Southern District Court, Florida, in Ventura v. Brosky 2006 WL 3392207 (S.D. Fla. 2006), stated —
+
+The Eleventh Circuit has also created a test for these circumstances, stating that where there exists a concurrent civil and criminal proceeding, a court must stay a civil proceeding pending resolution of a related criminal prosecution when "special circumstances" so require in the "interests of justice."
+
+(Bold emphasis added). See also United States v. Kordel, 397 U.S. 1, 12 & n. 27, 90 S.Ct. 763, 769-70 & n.27 (1970). The Ventura Court went on to state that "situations where a defendant in both criminal and civil proceedings must choose whether to waive his privilege against selfincrimination or to lose the civil case in summary or default judgment proceedings have met this test's burden and warrant a stay." Id. The Ventura court granted the stay. Here, the 15th Judicial Circuit action lives along with the NPA.
+
+In making a decision to enter such a stay, the court may consider the following factors:
+
+- (1) the interests of the Plaintiffs in proceeding expeditiously with litigation, or any aspect of it, and the potential prejudice of Plaintiff to the delay;
+- (2) the burden which any particular aspect of the proceedings may impose on the defendant;
+- (3) the convenience of the court in the management of its cases, and the efficient use of judicial resources;
+  - (4) the interests of persons not parties to the civil litigation; and
+  - (5) the interest of the public in the pending civil and criminal litigation.
+
+See U.S. v. Pinnacle Quest International, 2008 WL 4274498 (N.D. Fla. 2008).
+
+First, in applying the above factors, the Plaintiff in the instant matter will not be prejudiced simply by claiming a delay in time. Second, the burden is far greater on EPSTEIN if he is forced to waive his 5'h Amendment Privilege or remain silent and have a judgment entered against him or choose to testify and face criminal prosecution. Third, efficient use of judicial resources would be rendered upon a stay by way of preventing an appeal if such a stay is not entered. The Court has broad discretion to enter such a stay. Fourth, the interests of the individuals outlined in the NPA will be served because EPSTEIN's fulfillment of NPA alleged obligations is determinative upon whether the USAO prosecutes those individuals or whether the claims will be dropped upon the expiration of the NPA. Finally, the interest of the public in the pending civil and criminal cases will not be prejudiced as EPSTEIN is already serving his term whereby a plea was entered in the 15 Judicial Circuit action.
+
+# a. Application of the 5th Amendment
+
+Next, the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination "permits a person not to answer official questions put to him in any other proceeding, civil or criminal, formal or informal, where the answers might incriminate him in future criminal proceedings." Edwin v. Price 778 F.2d 668, 669 (11th Cir. 1985), can Lefkowitz v. Turley 414 U.S. 70, 77, 94 S.C. 316, 322 (1973). See also Ohio v. Reiner 532 U.S. 17, 21, 121 S.Ct. 1252 (2001)(The Fifth Amendment privilege is also available to those who claim innocence. One of the Fifth Amendment's "basic functions ... is to protect innocent men ... 'who otherwise might be ensnared by ambiguous circumstances."); Malloy v. Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment - "[i]t would be incongruous to have different standards
+
+determine the validity of a claim of privilege based on the same feared prosecution, depending on whether the claim was asserted in state or federal court."); Kastigar v. U.S. 406 U.S. 441, 444-45, 92 S.Ct. 1653 (1972)(The Fifth Amendment privilege "can be asserted in any proceeding, civil or criminal, administrative or judicial, investigatory or adjudicatory; and it protects against any disclosures which the witness reasonably believes could be used in a criminal prosecution or could lead to other evidence that might be so used. This Court has been zealous to safeguard the values which underlie the privilege." (Emphasis added)).
+
+The United States Supreme Court made it clear that the scope of the Fifth Amendment Privilege includes the circumstances as here "the act of producing documents in response to a subpoena (or production request) has a compelled testimonial aspect." United States v. Hubbell, 530 U.S. 27, 36, 120 S.Ct. 2037, 2043 (2000); Fisher v. United States 425 U.S. 391 (1976); McCormick on Evidence, Title 6, Chap. 13. The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination, §138 (6th Ed.). The privilege against self-incrimination may be asserted during discovery when a litigant has "reasonable grounds to believe that the response would furnish a link in the chain of evidence needed to prove a crime against a litigant." A witness, including a civil defendant, is entitled to invoke the Fifth Amendment privilege whenever there is a realistic possibility that the answer to a question could be used in anyway to convict the witness of a crime or could aid in the development of other incriminating evidence that can be used at trial. Id; Pillsbury Company v. Conbov 495 U.S. 248, 103 S.Ct. 608 (1983).
+
+Certainly, if the USAO decides to prosecute EPSTEIN for an alleged violation of the NPA, it would undoubtedly be able to use information obtained during discovery against him or use that information to aid in the development of other evidence against him at a criminal trial.
+
+The USAO is already claiming violations of the NPA based upon EPSTEIN defending the civil actions and, at the same time, while EPSTEIN asserts the 5'h Amendment. Imagine, because that is all we can do based on the lack of wording in the NPA, what violations the USAO will assert if EPSTEIN is forced to waive his 5'h Amendment privilege to defend himself in this and the other civil actions.
+
+The Fifth Amendment provides, in relevant part, that "No person ... shall be compelled in any Criminal Case to be a witness against himself." Hoffman v. United States, 341 U.S. 479, 486, 71 S.Ct. 814 (1951), v. United States, 1944, 322 U.S. 487, 489, 64 S.Ct. 1082, 1083, 88 L.Ed. 1408." The Fifth Amendment's privilege against self-incrimination is "accorded liberal construction in favor of the right it was intended to secure." "The immediate and potential evils of compulsory self-disclosure transcend any difficulties that the exercise of the privilege may impose on society in the detection and prosecution of a crime." Id., at 490; and In re= Financial Svcs. of Fla., Inc., 259 B.R. 391, 399 (M.D. Fla. 2000). The privilege not only extends to answers that would in themselves support a conviction under a criminal statute but likewise embraces those which would furnish a link in the chain of evidence needed to prosecute the claimant for a crime. Id, cirin Blau v. United States, 1950, 340 U.S. 159, 71 S.Ct. 223. The Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination "permits a person not to answer official questions put to him in any other proceeding, civil or criminal, formal or informal, where the answers might incriminate him in future criminal proceedings." Edwin v. Price, 778 F.2d at 669, citing Lefkowitz v. Turley 414 U.S. 70, 77, 94 S.C. 316, 322 (1973). As EPSTEIN is here, "the claimant must be `confronted by substantial and `real,' and not merely trifling or imaginary, hazards of incrimination."' See generally United States v. Apfelbaum, 445
+
+U.S. 115, 128, 100 S.Ct. 948, 956, 63 L.Ed.2d 250 (1980)). See also, United States v. Neff, 615 F.2d 1235, 1239 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 925, 100 S.Ct. 3018, 65 L.Ed.2d 1117 (1980)(Information is protected by the privilege not only if it would support a criminal conviction, but even if “the responses would merely ‘provide a lead or clue’ to evidence having a tendency to incriminate.’”). EPSTEIN falls under each of the above category of cases.
+
+The United States Supreme Court has made clear that the scope of the Fifth Amendment Privilege also encompasses the circumstance where “the act of producing documents in response to a subpoena (or production request) has a compelled testimonial aspect.” United States v. Hubbell, 530 U.S. 27, 36, 120 S.Ct. 2037, 2043 (2000); see also Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391 (1976). In explaining the application of the privilege, the Supreme Court stated:
+
+We have held that “the act of production” itself may implicitly communicate “statements of fact.” By “producing documents in compliance with a subpoena, the witness would admit that the papers existed, were in his possession or control, and were authentic.” Moreover, as was true in this case, when the custodian of documents responds to a subpoena, he may be compelled to take the witness stand and answer questions designed to determine whether he has produced everything demanded by the subpoena. The answers to those questions, as well as the act of production itself, may certainly communicate information about the existence, custody, and authenticity of the documents. Whether the constitutional privilege protects the answers to such questions, or protects the act of production itself, is a question that is distinct from the question whether the unprotected contents of the documents themselves are incriminating.
+
+“The issue presented in those cases was whether the act of producing subpoenaed documents, not itself the making of a statement, might nonetheless have some protected testimonial aspects. The Court concluded that the act of production could constitute protected testimonial communication because it might entail implicit statements of fact: by producing documents in compliance with a subpoena, the witness would admit that the papers existed, were in his possession or control, and were authentic. United States v. Doe, 465 U.S., at 613, and n. 11, 104 S.Ct. 1237; Fisher, 425 U.S., at 409-410, 96 S.Ct. 1569; *id.*, at 428, 432, 96 S.Ct. 1569 (concurring opinions). See Braswell v. United States, [487 U.S.] at 104, 108 S.Ct. 2284; [*id.*] at 122, 108 S.Ct. 2284 (dissenting opinion). Thus, the Court made clear that the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination applies to acts
+
+that imply assertions of fact."... An examination of the Court's application of these principles in other cases indicates the Court's recognition that, in order to be testimonial, an accused's communication must itself, explicitly or implicitly, relate a factual assertion or disclose information. Only then is a person compelled to be a `witness' against himself." Doe v. United States, 487 U.S., at 209-210. 108 S.Ct. 2341 (footnote omitted).
+
+Finally, the phrase "in any criminal case" in the text of the Fifth Amendment might have been read to limit its coverage to compelled testimony that is used against the defendant in the trial itself. It has, however, long been settled that its protection encompasses compelled statements that lead to the discovery of incriminating evidence even though the statements themselves are not incriminating and are not introduced into evidence. Thus, a half century ago we held that a trial judge had erroneously rejected a defendant's claim of privilege on the ground that his answer to the pending question would not itself constitute evidence of the charged offense. As we explained:
+
+"The privilege afforded not only extends to answers that would in themselves support a conviction under a federal criminal statute but likewise embraces those which would furnish a link in the chain of evidence needed to prosecute the claimant for a federal crime." Hoffinan v. United States. 341 U.S. 479. 486. 71 S.Ct. 814, 95 Ltd. 1118 (1951).
+
+Compelled testimony that communicates information that may "lead to incriminating evidence" is privileged even if the information itself is not inculpatory. Doe v. United States. 487 U.S. 201, 208, n. 6. 108 S.Ct. 2341, 101 L.Ed.2d 184 (1988). It's the Fifth Amendment's protection against the prosecutor's use of incriminating information derived directly or indirectly from the compelled testimony of the respondent that is of primary relevance in this case.
+
+The privilege against self-incrimination may be asserted during discovery when a litigant has "reasonable grounds to believe that the response would furnish a link in the chain of evidence needed to prove a crime against a litigant." A witness, including a civil defendant, is entitled to invoke the Fifth Amendment privilege whenever there is a realistic possibility that the answer to a question could be used in anyway to convict the witness of a crime or could aid in the development of other incriminating evidence that can be used at trial. Id• Pills ury Company
+
+v. Conbov, 495 U.S. 248, 103 S.Ct. 608 (1983). See also, Hubbell, supra, as to what is encompassed by the phrase "in any criminal case" contained in the Fifth Amendment.
+
+As noted, the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination is broad. Hoffman; In re Financial Svcs.,supra. To deny a witness the right to invoke the privilege, the judge must be perfectly clear, from a careful consideration of all the circumstances in the case, that the witness is mistaken, and that the answers cannot possibly have such tendency to incriminate. IA at 488, 399. Recognizing the breadth and magnitude of this constitutional privilege, the United States Supreme Court in discussing how a court is to analyze the application of the privilege stated —
+
+... It is for the court to say whether his silence is justified, Rogers v. United States 1951, 340 U.S. 367, 71 S.Ct. 438, and to require him to answer if it clearly appears to the court that he is mistaken.' Temple v. Commonwealth, 1880, 75 Va. 892, 899. However, if the witness, upon interposing his claim, were required to prove the hazard in the sense in which a claim is usually required to be established in court, he would be compelled to surrender the very protection which the privilege is designed to guarantee. To sustain the privilege, it need only be evident from the implications of the question, in the setting in which it is asked, that a responsive answer to the question or an explanation of why it cannot be answered might be dangerous because injurious disclosure could result. The trial judge in appraising the claim `must be governed as much by his personal perception of the peculiarities of the case as by the facts actually in evidence.'
+
+Hoffman, supra at 486-487.
+
+Hoffman and its progeny establish that "in view of the liberal construction of the provision [protecting against self-incrimination], after a witness has asserted the privilege, he should be compelled to provide the requested information only if it "clearly appears" to the court that the witness was mistaken in his invocation of the privilege." (Emphasis added). In Financial Svcs. supra at 399, rge Hoffinan at 486.
+
+In the instant case, the privilege applies as Defendant EPSTEIN "has reasonable cause to apprehend danger from a direct answer." The risk of incrimination resulting from being subject to discovery or to testify in his own defense while the NPA exists is "substantial and real" and "not trifling or imaginary haphazards of communication." See generally In re Financial Svcs., supra at 400. Based on the nature of Plaintiff's claims, along with the ongoing scrutiny of the USAO in the criminal matters, EPSTEIN has "reasonable grounds to believe that his responses to the discovery would furnish a link in the chain of evidence needed to prove a crime against him. Finally, in order to preserve the privilege, the privilege must be asserted or one risks the loss or waiver of this liberty ensuring protection. See generally, U.S. v. , 846 F.2d 678, 690 ( I 1th Cir. 1988)("First, it ignores the settled principle which requires a witness to assert his Fifth Amendment rights. A witness who testifies at any proceeding, instead of asserting his Fifth Amendment rights, loses the privilege. ... A civil deponent cannot choose to answer questions with the expectation of later asserting the Fifth Amendment.").
+
+Also applicable in upholding the assertion of the Fifth Amendment privilege is the guarantee of effective assistance of counsel by the Sixth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. See Yarborough v. Gentry 124 S.Ct. 1, 540 U.S. 1, 157 L.Ed.2d 1 (2003)(Sixth Amendment guarantees criminal defendants effective assistance of counsel.), on remand 381 F.3d 1219. The United States Constitutional guarantees are applicable to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment. Obviously, EPSTEIN's assertion of his constitutional privileges and protections is on the advice of counsel. Again, EPSTEIN continues to face criminal prosecution by the USAO until the expiration of the NPA; under the constitutional guarantee of effective assistance of
+
+counsel, he is entitled to follow the recommended advice of his criminal defense attorney. See Goldberger Affidavit attached hereto.
+
+EPSTEIN's invocation of his constitutional protections of the Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments must be upheld for the reasons set forth herein; otherwise such constitutional protections would be rendered meaningless. Already and recently, Defendant EPSTEIN in his Response and Objections to discovery, attached hereto as Exhibit "C", has been required to assert, on advice of counsel, his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination, along with his constitutional rights afforded under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution. Thus, EPSTEIN's entitlement to a stay is ripe for determination.
+
+Based upon the foregoing, a stay is warranted in this action as the Defendant is being forced to choose between the assertion of his Fifth Amendment right or losing this case by judgment (summary or otherwise) or waiver of his 5fl Amendment right and face potential criminal prosecution.
+
+By: ROB ,i/ R Ta CRI ON, ., ESQ.
+
+## Certificate of Service
+
+I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify tha the for,egoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record identified o he fol .ng Service List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on this t4 day of 2009:
+
+Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A. 18205 Biscayne Boulevard Suite 2218 Miami, FL 33160 305-931-2200
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 561-659-8300 Fax: 561-835-8691
+
+Fax: 305-931-0877  
+ssm@sexabuseattorney.com  
+ahorowitz@sexabuseattorney.com  
+*Counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe #3*
+
+jagesq@bellsouth.net  
+*Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein*
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+![]()
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739644/EFTA02739644.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739644/EFTA02739644.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6da6758a1a502c50b93879a550f8337f0ad87bfe
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739644/EFTA02739644.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,716 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739644.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 15,
+  "chars": 27516,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 10.01,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            198.55999755859375,
+            109.35000000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            405.75600000000003,
+            109.35000000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            405.75600000000003,
+            137.29351806640625
+          ],
+          [
+            198.55999755859375,
+            137.29351806640625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's Motion To Stay And Or Continue Action For Time Certain Based On \nParallel Civil And Criminal Proceedings With Incorporated Memorandum Of Law",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            67.932,
+            341.01
+          ],
+          [
+            536.1120000000001,
+            341.01
+          ],
+          [
+            536.1120000000001,
+            368.66351318359375
+          ],
+          [
+            67.932,
+            368.66351318359375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "I. Introduction",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            248.47200000000004,
+            520.02
+          ],
+          [
+            354.3145751953125,
+            520.02
+          ],
+          [
+            354.3145751953125,
+            534.343017578125
+          ],
+          [
+            248.47200000000004,
+            534.343017578125
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "II. THE NPA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            257.652,
+            95.58
+          ],
+          [
+            350.06399999999996,
+            95.58
+          ],
+          [
+            350.06399999999996,
+            111.35302734375
+          ],
+          [
+            257.652,
+            111.35302734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Ill. Justice Requires The Entry of A Stay Because Defendant Is Being \nForced To Choose Between Waiving His Sth Amendment Privilege Or Risk \nLosing This Civil Case And Forfeiting Other Constitutional Guarantees Of \nDue Process And Effective Assistance Of Counsel",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            111.384,
+            483.57
+          ],
+          [
+            497.59088134765625,
+            483.57
+          ],
+          [
+            497.59088134765625,
+            540.35302734375
+          ],
+          [
+            111.384,
+            540.35302734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "a. Application of the 5th Amendment",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            197.06400000000002,
+            398.52
+          ],
+          [
+            411.876,
+            398.52
+          ],
+          [
+            411.876,
+            414.7230224609375
+          ],
+          [
+            197.06400000000002,
+            414.7230224609375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Certificate of Service",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 13,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            258.876,
+            509.49
+          ],
+          [
+            384.7413635253906,
+            509.49
+          ],
+          [
+            384.7413635253906,
+            524.6835327148438
+          ],
+          [
+            258.876,
+            524.6835327148438
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            24
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            9
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            55
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            55
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            60
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            66
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            70
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            63
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            63
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            67
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 9,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 10,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            83
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            36
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 11,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            81
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            31
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 12,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            59
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 13,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            81
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            40
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 14,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            11
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739644"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739659/EFTA02739659.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739659/EFTA02739659.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..48933336d31641ab62e73bb9cb96c7d27c80b2b9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739659/EFTA02739659.md
@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
+C
+
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRAa
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## PLAINTIFF JANE DOE 3'S ANSWERS TO DEFENDANT'S FIRST INTERROGATORIES
+
+Plaintiff, JANE DOE 3, by and through their undersigned counsel, and pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 33, hereby responds to Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S First Set of Interrogatories to Plaintiff as follows:
+
+# General Objections
+
+1. Plaintiff objects to Defendant's Interrogatories to the extent that the Interrogatories call for the disclosure of information protected by the attorney-client privilege, attorney work-product doctrine, or other applicable privilege or immunity, whether created by statute or common law. Plaintiff claims such privileges and protectiOns to the extent implicated by each Interrogatory, and excludes privileged and protected information from any responses to Defendant's discovery. Any disclosure is inadvertent and is not intended to waive those privileges or protections, which are specifically reserved.
+
+2. Plaintiff objects to Defendant's Interrogatories to the extent that same are vague, ambiguous, Incomprehensible and/or overly broad.
+
+.Doe l;lo. 3 v. Epstein Page 13
+
+C C
+
+your current age. Describe the lewd or lascivious exhibition, the date and whether you received money or other consideration from the person
+
+Answer:
+
+Plaintiff objects to this interrogatory as vague, overly broad, unduly burdensome, harassing, and not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence. Moreover, this interrogatory is outrageous, offensive and apparently posed for the purpose of intimidating the victim. Fed.R.Evid. 412 makes any answer to this interrogatory inadmissible, and nothing In the answer could plausibly lead to discovery of admissible evidence.
+
+- 22. List in detail all discussions/interviews which you had with any representative from FBI, U.S. Attorneys' Office, State Attorneys' Office (Palm Beach County), Palm Beach Sheriffs Office and Palm Beach Police Department regarding your meetings with Mr. Epstein. Include dates, who was present, the details of what was discussed, whether a court reporter was present and whether a taped statement was taken or whether you provided a written statement.
+
+Answer:
+
+Plaintiff met with the Palm Beach Police Department in 2007. She believes that she provided them with a written statement, and that they also tape recorded her interview.
+
+Plaintiff also spoke with FBI agents in 2007 investigating the case on 2-3 occasions, including one meeting in person. Plaintiff does not believe that the statement was recorded.
+
+- 23. State the names, addresses, ages and phone numbers of all females whom you claim were brought by you to Mr. Epstein's home to give him a massage. As to each female, state the amount of money you claim you were paid to bring each female.
+
+Answer:
+
+(Sane bee 4) Plaintiff was not paid by the Defendant of bringing.. (7u:Lne boe-
+
+cTxvie the Plaintiffas w paid \$1 0 for bringing (Saxe Doe a•-\
+
+VERIFICATION
+
+Jane Doe 3 being duly sworn, deposes and says that the foregoing answers to interrogatories are true and correct to the best of her knowledge, information and belief.
+
+Jane Doe 3
+
+STATE OF FLORIDA
+
+)  
+)  
+)
+
+COUNTY OF PALM BEACH
+
+ss  
+)
+
+SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED before me this 19 day of January, 2009 by Jane Doe 3, who is personally known to me or has produced the following identification rivers kicewa: which is current or has been issued within the past five years and bears a serial or other identifying number.
+
+Elizabeth Gutierrez  
+Print Name
+
+Elizabeth Gutierrez  
+Signature
+
+NOTARY PUBLIC - STATE OF FLORIDA  
+Commission Number:  
+My commission expires:  
+(Notarial Seal)
+
+![](_page_2_Picture_25.jpeg)
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739659/EFTA02739659.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739659/EFTA02739659.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ac217e436573231401293342aab52807cd492073
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739659/EFTA02739659.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,256 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739659.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 3,
+  "chars": 3794,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 4.01,
+  "image_assets": [
+    "_page_2_Picture_25.jpeg"
+  ],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            216.239990234375,
+            107.863
+          ],
+          [
+            407.03200000000004,
+            107.863
+          ],
+          [
+            407.03200000000004,
+            134.427001953125
+          ],
+          [
+            216.239990234375,
+            134.427001953125
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "PLAINTIFF JANE DOE 3'S ANSWERS TO DEFENDANT'S FIRST \nINTERROGATORIES",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            138.4499969482422,
+            319.53400000000005
+          ],
+          [
+            477.527,
+            319.53400000000005
+          ],
+          [
+            477.527,
+            346.3070373535156
+          ],
+          [
+            138.4499969482422,
+            346.3070373535156
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "General Objections",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            253.78199999999998,
+            433.7802734375
+          ],
+          [
+            359.05712890625,
+            433.7802734375
+          ],
+          [
+            359.05712890625,
+            447.5470275878906
+          ],
+          [
+            253.78199999999998,
+            447.5470275878906
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "EXHIBIT \"A\"",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            265.42900000000003,
+            725.814697265625
+          ],
+          [
+            351.3482666015625,
+            725.814697265625
+          ],
+          [
+            351.3482666015625,
+            741.6429595947266
+          ],
+          [
+            265.42900000000003,
+            741.6429595947266
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "VERIFICATION",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            278.30199999999996,
+            111.107
+          ],
+          [
+            359.21799999999996,
+            111.107
+          ],
+          [
+            359.21799999999996,
+            124.083
+          ],
+          [
+            278.30199999999996,
+            124.083
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            9
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            72
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            36
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            19
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "Picture",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739659"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739659/_page_2_Picture_25.jpeg b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739659/_page_2_Picture_25.jpeg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..49fa7929bb9f68eb1baf69ad98c582bb7b36d407
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739659/_page_2_Picture_25.jpeg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:34230762fffe7167618deda0f6fef447dc8fc6d2b9eb253e41af778f86fb4eb5
+size 9667
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739662/EFTA02739662.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739662/EFTA02739662.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..80b39761a12da25a1bcd9cd0d258d0cc7a5e41a6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739662/EFTA02739662.md
@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA-cla
+
+JANE DOE NO. 2,
+
+Plaintiff, v.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+11+1 DOCKET
+
+# NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION VIA VIDEO
+
+PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned attorney will take the deposition via video of:
+
+## DEPONENT DATE & TIME LOCATION OF DEPOSITION
+
+Jane Doe #3 Tuesday, U.S. Legal Support 18205 Biscayne Boulevard 9:00 a.m. Suite <sup>300</sup>
+
+do Stuart Mermelstein, Esq. April 14, 2008 444 West Railroad Avenue Suite 2218 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Miami, FL 33160 Phone: 561 835-0220
+
+upon oral examination, before U.S. Legal Support, a Notary Public, or any other officer authorized by law to take depositions in the State of Florida. The oral examination is being taken for the purpose of discovery, for use at trial, or for Bch other purposes as are permitted under the applicable Statutes of Rules of Court.
+
+Robert D Craton, Jr. Attome or Defendant Epstein
+
+## Certificate of Service
+
+<sup>I</sup>HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was served this \*on all counsel of record identified on the following Service by fax an U.S. Mail, this /&—day of March 2009:
+
+Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. Jack Alan Goldberger
+
+Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
+
+Jane Doe No. 2 v. Epstein  
+Page 2
+
+Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A.  
+18205 Biscayne Boulevard  
+Suite 2218  
+Miami, FL 33160  
+305-931-2200  
+Fax: 305-931-0877  
+[ssm@sexabuseattorney.com](mailto:ssm@sexabuseattorney.com)  
+[ahorowitz@sexabuseattorney.com](mailto:ahorowitz@sexabuseattorney.com)  
+Counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe #2
+
+250 Australian Avenue South  
+Suite 1400  
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012  
+561-659-8300  
+Fax: 561-835-8691  
+[iagesq@bellsouth.net](mailto:iagesq@bellsouth.net)  
+*Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein*
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+By: \_\_\_\_\_  
+ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ.  
+Florida Bar No. 224162  
+[rcrit@bclclaw.com](mailto:rcrit@bclclaw.com)  
+MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ.  
+Florida Bar #617296  
+[mpike@bclclaw.com](mailto:mpike@bclclaw.com)  
+BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN  
+515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400  
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401  
+561/842-2820 Phone  
+561/515-3148 Fax
+
+*(Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein)*
+
+Courtesy Copy: U.S. Legal
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739662/EFTA02739662.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739662/EFTA02739662.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e710d825992bf407a676cae59002572ed74c75c3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739662/EFTA02739662.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,227 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739662.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 2,
+  "chars": 2279,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 4.64,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            207.80700000000002,
+            69.746
+          ],
+          [
+            419.01513671875,
+            69.746
+          ],
+          [
+            419.01513671875,
+            97.750244140625
+          ],
+          [
+            207.80700000000002,
+            97.750244140625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION VIA VIDEO",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            178.99599999999998,
+            280.60599999999994
+          ],
+          [
+            443.92254638671875,
+            280.60599999999994
+          ],
+          [
+            443.92254638671875,
+            295.8245849609375
+          ],
+          [
+            178.99599999999998,
+            295.8245849609375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            64.978,
+            347.919
+          ],
+          [
+            137.312,
+            347.919
+          ],
+          [
+            137.312,
+            361.706
+          ],
+          [
+            64.978,
+            361.706
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "DEPONENT DATE & TIME LOCATION OF DEPOSITION",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            69.09588623046875,
+            351.16299999999995
+          ],
+          [
+            529.5939331054688,
+            351.16299999999995
+          ],
+          [
+            529.5939331054688,
+            365.9803466796875
+          ],
+          [
+            69.09588623046875,
+            365.9803466796875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            258.686,
+            349.541
+          ],
+          [
+            342.66700000000003,
+            349.541
+          ],
+          [
+            342.66700000000003,
+            363.328
+          ],
+          [
+            258.686,
+            363.328
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Certificate of Service",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            245.813,
+            599.3290000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            372.3151550292969,
+            599.3290000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            372.3151550292969,
+            613.4690856933594
+          ],
+          [
+            245.813,
+            613.4690856933594
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            251
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            16
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            13
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739662"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739664/EFTA02739664.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739664/EFTA02739664.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5dc460dc5c6727f977920102a92f42d5422d9d07
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739664/EFTA02739664.md
@@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
+### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA I
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+#### MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AGAINST PIECEMEAL DEPOSITIONS OF JANE DOE NO. 3, MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE CASES FOR PURPOSES OF DISCOVERY, AND INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT
+
+Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 3, by and through undersigned counsel, files this Motion for Protective Order Against Piecemeal Depositions of Jane Doe No. 3, Motion to Consolidate Cases for Purposes of Discovery, and Memorandum of Law in Support, as follows:
+
+### I. Introduction
+
+This is one of six (6) related cases in this Court against Defendant Jeffrey Epstein, each alleging that the Defendant sexually assaulted the Plaintiff in that case when she was a minor. This Motion is prompted by the Defendant's efforts to take the deposition of Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 3 as a witness in the related case, Jane Doe No. 2 v. Epstein, case no. 08-CV-80119-Marra. Defendant, however, does not at this time seek to take Jane Doe No. 3's deposition in her own case. The Defendant apparently intends to take Jane Doe No. 3's deposition at least twice, and as discussed below, most likely three times.
+
+Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 3 alleges that she is a victim of sexual assault by Defendant Epstein. To compel her to sit for deposition by Epstein's attorney more than once would be unduly
+
+traumatizing, burdensome, annoying, harassing and, most importantly, unnecessary. There is no conceivable good faith basis for Defendant's attorney to require that Jane Doe No. 3's deposition to be taken more than once.
+
+Accordingly, Jane Doe No. 3 seeks a protective order limiting Defendant's counsel to a single deposition of Jane Doe No. 3, encompassing her claims as a party in her own case and as a witness in any other case pending in this Court against Defendant Epstein alleging sexual misconduct. As a corollary to this relief, Plaintiff moves for consolidation of the six (6) related cases for purposes of pretrial discovery pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 42(a).
+
+# H. Background and Relevant Facts
+
+The cases Jane Doe No. 2 v. Epstein, case no. 08-CV-80119-Marra, Jane Doe No. 3 v. Epstein, case no. 08-CV-80232- Marra, Jane Doe No. 4 v. Epstein 08-CV-80380- MARLS Jane Doe No. 5 v. Epstein case no. 08-CV-80387- Marra, Jane Doe No. 6 v. Epstein, case no. -CV-80994- Marra and Jane Doe No. 7 v. Epstein, case no. 08- 80993-C1V- Marra,\_, are related cases in this Court.' These cases have been treated jointly for purposes of pretrial scheduling and deadlines. The Court entered a single Order Setting Trial and Discovery Deadlines et al., dated September 29, 2008, in the four cases, Jane Does 2-5 v. Epstein (DE 40). The Jane Doe No. 6 and Jane Doe No. 7 cases, which were filed later, were likewise treated jointly and a single Order Setting Trial Date and Discovery Deadlines et al. entered for those cases dated December 18, 2008.
+
+<sup>&#</sup>x27; In all of the cases Jane Doe Nos. 2-7 v. Epstein the Plaintiffs are represented by the same counsel. There are other similar cases pending in this Court and in state court against Defendant Epstein in which the plaintiffs are represented by different counsel.
+
+On September 25, 2008, the parties filed a single Joint Scheduling and Discovery Report in the four cases, Jane Doe Nos. 2-5. (DE 39). In this Report, the Plaintiff takes the position that it would be in the interests of judicial economy and efficiency to consolidate these cases at least for discovery purposes. (Joint Report, p. 5, §II(D)). The Defendant, however, states in this Report his position in opposition to consolidation for any purpose. (1st).
+
+All of the cases Jane Doe Nos. 2-7 v. Epstein allege sexual assaults by Defendant Epstein. They all make identical claims for relief for Sexual Assault and Battery (Count I); Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (Count II); and Coercion and Enticement to Sexual Activity in Violation of 18 U.S.C. §2422 (Count III). Most importantly for present purposes, they all allege the same plan and scheme by Defendant Epstein to lure underage girls to his Palm Beach mansion for the purpose of giving a massage, and that he sexually molested them during the course of this massage. (ate, u t, Jane Doe No. 3 Second Amended Complaint 11 7-11; Jane Doe 4, Second Amended Complaint, Ili 8-12).
+
+Jane Doe No. 3 in discovery responses served on January 26, 2009 disclosed that she brought three other girls to Epstein's mansion for the purpose giving him a massage. These other girls include Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 2 and Jane Doe. No. 4. (Les Plaintiff Jane Doe 3's Answers to Interrogatories, no. 23, attached hereto as Exhibit "A").
+
+On March 16, 2009, Defendant's counsel served a Notice of Taking Deposition of Jane Doe No. 3 in the Jane Doe No. 2case (A copy of this Notice is attached hereto as Exhibit B).2 By letters dated March 3, 2009 and March 20, 2009, Plaintiff's counsel advised Defendant's counsel that Plaintiffs oppose the taking of their depositions more than once, and insisted that each Plaintiff's deposition be noticed in her own case as well as any other case in which she is a witness. Defendant's counsel has to date failed to respond to this correspondence, or otherwise provide any reason why he should be allowed to take a victim's deposition more than once. Absent a protective order or other relief, Defendant's counsel could take Jane Doe No. 3's deposition three times, once in her own case and as a witness in both the Jane Doe No. 2 and Jane Doe No. 4 cases. (See Exh.
+
+# III. Argument
+
+### A. A PLAINTIFF IN THESE CASES SHOULD NOT BE REOUIRED TO APPEAR FOR DEPOSITION MORE THAN ONCE
+
+The district court has discretion to fashion a protective order under Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(c). Farnsworth v. Procter & Gamble Co. 758 F.2d 1545 (11th Cir. 1985). This discretion "does not depend upon a legal privilege." Id.; Auto Owners Ins. Co. v. Southeast Floating Docks, Inc., 231 F.R.D. 426, 429-30 (M.D.Fla. 2005). Under Rule 26(c), "the Court may, for good cause, issue an order to protect a party or person from annoyance, embarrassment, oppression or undue burden or expense."
+
+The federal rules expressly recognize that a party should not without cause be deposed more than once. Fed.R.Civ.P. 30(a)(2)(B). "[I]t is clear that the prohibition against deposing a second witness without leave of court exists to protect the witness. Indeed, cases construing Rule 30(a)(2)(B) concern protection of the deponent from, for example, undue burden or harassment." Beaulieu v. Bd. of Trustees, 2007 WL 4468704 (N.D. Fla. 2007). See also Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(b)(2)(C)(i) (directing the court to limit the frequency or extent of discovery otherwise allowed under the rules where "the discovery sought is unreasonably cumulative or duplicative, or can be obtained from some other source that is more convenient, less burdensome, or less expensive").
+
+<sup>2</sup> The deposition was unilaterally scheduled for April 14, 2009.
+
+Additionally, Fed.R.Civ.P. 45(c) provides that the party or attorney issuing a subpoena must take reasonable steps to avoid imposing an undue burden on the deponent, and that the Court may impose an appropriate sanction, including reasonable attorneys' fees, if the party or attorney fails to comply.
+
+In the present cases, where sexual misconduct is at issue, Jane Doe No. 3 will be unduly burdened by one or more separate depositions of her as a witness, to be followed by her deposition as a party. Sste Miscellaneous Docket Matter #1 v. Miscellaneous Docket Matter #2 197 F.3d 922, 925 (8th Cir. 1999) (case where sexual matters at issue, holding that district court was warranted in quashing subpoena of witness' second deposition to protect witness from embarrassment and undue burden).
+
+Defendant's counsel seeks to circumvent these rules by noticing Jane Doe No. 3's deposition first as a witness in the Jane Doe No. 2case, apparently to be followed by her depositions in her own case and the Jane Doe No. 7 case. Such multiple depositions of the Plaintiff would be contrary to judicial economy and efficiency, and would serve only to unduly harass, annoy and burden the Plaintiff. Defendant's counsel has offered no reason whatsoever why Jane Doe No. 3's deposition should not be taken just once, encompassing her knowledge of facts and information relevant to all three related cases. It is inconceivable that Defendant's counsel would be prejudiced if Jane Doe No. 3 were to sit for deposition just once.
+
+Accordingly, good cause exists for a protective order preventing Defendant from taking Plaintiff's deposition piecemeal in separate cases, and requiring that the Plaintiff's deposition be taken just once, covering all of the related cases against Epstein.
+
+### B. THESE RELATED CASES SHOULD BE CONSOLIDATED FOR PURPOSES OF DISCOVERY
+
+As a corollary to the protective order sought by Jane Doe No. 3, the problem of multiple depositions of any Plaintiff could be avoided by consolidating the related cases for purposes of pretrial discovery pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 42(a). Consolidation may be appropriate where "actions before the court involve a common question of law or fact", and in such cases the court is authorized to issue "orders to avoid unnecessary cost or delay." Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(aX3). "Consolidation of actions in their pretrial stage, under many circumstances, will be a desirable administrative technique and is within the power of the Court." , Federal Practice & Procedure §2382 (2008). See also v. Eagle Building Technologies 209 F.R.C. 499, 501 (S.D. Fla. 2002) (noting that Court has broad discretion under Rule 42(a) to consolidate cases within its district). "In deciding whether to consolidate actions, we have instructed that district courts should consider whether doing so could lead to prejudice or confusion." Ramsay v. Broward County Sheriffs Office 2008 WL 5237162 \*3 (1 I th Cir. 2008).
+
+The common and overlapping issues in this case, both factual and legal, are patent and obvious. Here, Plaintiff moves for limited consolidation, for purposes of pretrial discovery only. Such a consolidation is common and appropriate to further the interests of judicial economy and efficiency. See, e.g., In re Enron Corm Securities Litigation, 206 F.R.P. 427, 438 (S.D. Tex. 2002). At the same time, there is no conceivable prejudice or confusion that would result from consolidation for purposes of pretrial discovery. To the contrary, consolidation will avoid unnecessary prejudice and confusion. For example, with regard to the instant Motion, consolidation for purposes of discovery would make it clear that each party/witness can only be deposed once, covering all issues in the related cases.
+
+WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests (i) a protective order pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(c) requiring that the deposition of Jane Doe No. 3 be taken no more than once, for purposes of all
+
+of the related case to which her testimony may be relevant; (ii) an order pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 45 quashing the unilateral nonparty subpoena for deposition of Jane Doe No. 3 in the Jane Doe No. 2 case; (iii) an order pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 42(a) consolidating the Jane Doe Nos. 2-7 v. Epstein cases for purposes of pretrial discovery; and (iv) such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper.
+
+Dated: March 26, 2009
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+By: s/ Stuart S. Mermelstein Stuart S. Mermelstein (FL Bar No. 947245) ssm@sexabuseattorney.com Adam D. Horowitz (FL Bar No. 376980) ahorowitz@sexabuseattorney.com MERMELSTEIN & HOROWITZ, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiff 18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160 Tel: 305-931-2200 Fax: 305-931-0877
+
+# CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO S.D.FLA.I..R. 7.1( AH3)
+
+Counsel for Plaintiff has made reasonable efforts to confer with counsel for Defendant, by letters dated March 3, 2009 and March 20, 2009 and by telephone, seeking in good faith to resolve or narrow the issues raised in the Motion, but Defendant's counsel failed to respond to Plaintiffs letters, and Plaintiffs counsel has been unable to resolve this dispute.
+
+s/ Stuart S. Mennelstein
+
+#### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
+
+I hereby certify that on March 26, 2009, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day to all parties on the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those parties who are not authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing.
+
+/s/ Stuart S. Mermelstein
+
+#### SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. jgoldberger@agwpa.com
+
+Robert D. Critton, Esq. rcritton@bc1claw.com
+
+/s/ Stuart S. Mermelstein
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739664/EFTA02739664.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739664/EFTA02739664.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..da821e2992da2eb9aa037a502bd22ea828f55fd4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739664/EFTA02739664.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,631 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739664.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 10,
+  "chars": 12917,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.22,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            405.95098876953125,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            405.95098876953125,
+            115.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            115.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AGAINST \nPIECEMEAL DEPOSITIONS OF JANE DOE NO. 3, MOTION \nTO CONSOLIDATE CASES FOR PURPOSES OF DISCOVERY, \nAND INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            129.744,
+            295.65
+          ],
+          [
+            486.44183349609375,
+            295.65
+          ],
+          [
+            486.44183349609375,
+            353.2330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            129.744,
+            353.2330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "I. Introduction",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            252.144,
+            450.36
+          ],
+          [
+            359.27581787109375,
+            450.36
+          ],
+          [
+            359.27581787109375,
+            465.363037109375
+          ],
+          [
+            252.144,
+            465.363037109375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "H. Background and Relevant Facts",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            202.572,
+            309.42
+          ],
+          [
+            409.92999267578125,
+            309.42
+          ],
+          [
+            409.92999267578125,
+            324.80352783203125
+          ],
+          [
+            202.572,
+            324.80352783203125
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "III. Argument",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            258.264,
+            225.99000000000004
+          ],
+          [
+            353.5090026855469,
+            225.99000000000004
+          ],
+          [
+            353.5090026855469,
+            241.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            258.264,
+            241.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "A. A PLAINTIFF IN THESE CASES SHOULD NOT BE \nREOUIRED TO APPEAR FOR DEPOSITION MORE THAN ONCE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            141.372,
+            253.53000000000003
+          ],
+          [
+            506.6518859863281,
+            253.53000000000003
+          ],
+          [
+            506.6518859863281,
+            283.1030578613281
+          ],
+          [
+            141.372,
+            283.1030578613281
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "B. THESE RELATED CASES SHOULD BE \nCONSOLIDATED FOR PURPOSES OF DISCOVERY",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            177.48,
+            672.3
+          ],
+          [
+            469.49139404296875,
+            672.3
+          ],
+          [
+            469.49139404296875,
+            702.3630142211914
+          ],
+          [
+            177.48,
+            702.3630142211914
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO S.D.FLA.I..R. 7.1( AH3)",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            156.06,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            455.79681396484375,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            455.79681396484375,
+            101.2330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            156.06,
+            101.2330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            227.052,
+            86.67
+          ],
+          [
+            385.0019836425781,
+            86.67
+          ],
+          [
+            385.0019836425781,
+            100.863037109375
+          ],
+          [
+            227.052,
+            100.863037109375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "SERVICE LIST \nDOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN \nUnited States District Court, Southern District of Florida",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 9,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            156.06,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            455.1379089355469,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            455.1379089355469,
+            129.2335205078125
+          ],
+          [
+            156.06,
+            129.2335205078125
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            66
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            67
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            65
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            57
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            24
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            59
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            41
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            21
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            19
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            9
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            19
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 9,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            21
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            11
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739664"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739674/EFTA02739674.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739674/EFTA02739674.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..16c986a556f59ceeeb31fab375f9f7bb548879ea
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739674/EFTA02739674.md
@@ -0,0 +1,311 @@
+Westlaw.
+
+703 So.2d 1076  
+703 So.2d 1076, 22 Fla. L. Weekly D2375, 23 Fla. L. Weekly D169  
+(Cite as: 703 So.2d 1076)
+
+Page 1
+
+District Court of Appeal of Florida,  
+Fifth District.  
+Kimberly BALAS and Teresa Shumate, Petitioners,  
+v.  
+Marjorie A. RUZZO, and Exec., Inc., etc., Re-  
+spondents.  
+No. 97-82.
+
+307Ak31 k. Relevancy and Materiality.  
+Most Cited Cases  
+Party may be permitted to discover evidence that  
+would be inadmissible at trial, if it would lead to  
+discovery of relevant evidence. West's F.S.A. RCP  
+Rule 1.280(b)(1).
+
+**[3] Pretrial Procedure 307A ✉36.1**
+
+As Modified on Grant of Clarification Jan. 2, 1998.  
+rev. denied, 719 So.2d 286 (Fla.  
+Plaintiffs brought action against alleged house of 1998).  
+prostitution for, inter alia, coercion of prostitution.  
+The Circuit Court, Brevard County, █ Pound,  
+J., granted in part defendants' motion to compel dis-  
+covery. Plaintiffs filed petition for writ of certior-  
+ari. The District Court of Appeal, W. Sharp, J., held  
+that evidence of plaintiffs' past prostitution and  
+their revenues relating to such activities was dis-  
+coverable.
+
+307A Pretrial Procedure  
+307AII Depositions and Discovery  
+307AII(A) Discovery in General  
+307Ak36 Particular Subjects of Disclos- ure  
+307Ak36.1 k. In General. Most Cited
+
+Petition denied.  
+Harris, J., concurred specially and filed opinion.
+
+West Headnotes
+
+**[1] Pretrial Procedure 307A ✉31**  
+307A Pretrial Procedure  
+307AII Depositions and Discovery  
+307AII(A) Discovery in General  
+307Ak31 k. Relevancy and Materiality.
+
+Cases  
+Evidence of plaintiffs' past prostitution and their  
+revenues relating to such activities, including activ-  
+ities with alleged house of prostitution against  
+which they had filed suit, was discoverable, where  
+plaintiffs brought action not only for coercion of  
+prostitution, but also for battery, false imprison-  
+ment, invasion of privacy, intentional infliction of  
+emotional distress, violation of their civil rights,  
+and racketeering. Violent Crime Control and Law  
+Enforcement Act of 1994, § 40302, 42 U.S.C.A. §  
+13981; West's F.S.A. §§ 772.014, 796.09; West's  
+F.S.A. RCP Rule 1.280(b)(1).  
+\*1076 Richard E. █ and Heather Fisher Lind-  
+say, of Spriggs & █ Tallahassee, for Peti-  
+tioners.
+
+Most Cited Cases  
+Discovery in civil cases must be relevant to subject  
+matter of case and must be admissible or reason-  
+ably calculated to lead to admissible evidence.  
+West's F.S.A. RCP Rule 1.280(b)(1).
+
+Mark S. Peters of Amari, Theriac & Eisenmenger,  
+P.A., Cocoa, for Respondents.  
+W. SHARP, Judge.
+
+**[2] Pretrial Procedure 307A ✉31**
+
+Balas and Shumate petition this court for a writ of  
+certiorari to review certain portions of the lower  
+court's order which granted, in part, a motion to  
+compel discovery filed by respondents Ruzzo and  
+Exec., Inc. Petitioners argue that those portions de-  
+part from the essential requirements of law and will  
+cause them irreparable harm because they will be
+
+307A Pretrial Procedure  
+307AII Depositions and Discovery  
+307AII(A) Discovery in General
+
+EXHIBIT "A"
+
+703 So.2d 1076, 22 Fla. L. Weekly D2375, 23 Fla. L. Weekly D169(Cite as: 703 So.2d 1076)compelled to disclose intimate details of their sexual history. We decline to issue the writ of certiorari.
+
+Balas and Shumate filed suit against Ruzzo and Exec, Inc., doing business as "The Boardroom." According to Balas and Shumate, The Boardroom operates ostensibly as \*1077 a leisure spa but actually is a house of prostitution. Balas worked at The Boardroom from December 1993 until February 1996; Shumate worked there from October 1992 until March 1996. Ruzzo, the sole officer and shareholder of Exec, Inc., collected about fifty to sixty percent of each employees' earnings from performing sexual acts.
+
+According to Balas and Shumate, Ruzzo exerted mental and emotional control over her employees and thus she was able to exploit them as prostitutes. Ruzzo required her employees to pay her substantial sums of money to attend "metaphysical workshops" conducted by Ruzzo or persons associated with her. At the work place, the employees were required to participate in religious and quasi-religious "circles," rituals and incantations. These practices were allegedly designed to break down the personalities of the women who worked for Ruzzo and to ██████████ dependency and loyalty to herself. At one time when the earnings of a new employee were missing and believed to be stolen, Ruzzo required that the petitioners be strip searched and body cavity searched. Ruzzo caused the petitioners to believe their continued employment was dependent on their submission to these searches and that they might be arrested on felony charges if they refused to submit to the searches.
+
+Balas and Shumate's second amended complaint against Ruzzo contains seven counts. Count I is an action for coercion of prostitution pursuant to section 796.09, Florida Statutes. Petitioners allege the requirement that they perform sexual acts to retain their employment constitutes inducement and coercion to engage in prostitution. Count II is a claim for battery for the unwanted and offensive touching of the petitioners' bodies. Count III is a claim for false imprisonment for physically confining the pe-
+
+titioners against their will. Count IV alleges that respondents' actions constituted an invasion of petitioners' privacy. Count V is a claim for the intentional infliction of emotional distress. Count VI alleges a civil rights action-that respondents have violated petitioners' right to be free from crimes of violence motivated by gender within the meaning of 42 U.S.C. section 13981. Finally, count VII seeks civil remedies for criminal practices or racketeering pursuant to section 772.104, Florida Statutes. The petitioners claim that they suffered emotional pain, anguish, humiliation, insult, indignity, loss of self-esteem, inconvenience, hurt and emotional distress. They seek an award of general and punitive damages, among other relief.
+
+The discovery to which the petitioners are being required to respond is as follows:
+
+#### I.
+
+**Interrogatory 8:** Please advise how long have you been engaged in prostitution....
+
+#### II.
+
+**Interrogatory 22:** State with specificity the manner in which the acts as described in your Complaint have materially affected how you interact with your husband, boyfriend, fiancée' [sic] or any other individual of the opposite sex.
+
+#### III.
+
+**Request for Production 30:** A copy of any photographs, movies or videotapes in which you performed sexual acts and/or simulated sexual acts in exchange for money or other consideration.
+
+#### IV.
+
+**Interrogatory 16:** Please list the names, addresses, telephone numbers and rates of pay for all employers for which you worked, including the
+
+703 So.2d 1076  
+ 703 So.2d 1076, 22 Fla. L. Weekly D2375, 23 Fla. L. Weekly D169  
+ (Cite as: 703 So.2d 1076)
+
+Page 3
+
+nature of the work, during the five years immediately preceding the date of employment with the Boardroom and from the date of your termination with the Boardroom to the present, providing the names of your immediate supervisors at each place of employment and the reason for your leaving each place of employment.
+
+V.
+
+**Interrogatory 26:** Please state your total income while employed at the Boardroom, and state the source of that income including any income from other employment or \*1078 income earned from prostitution other than at the Boardroom.
+
+VI.
+
+**Request for Production 34:** Business records from any selfemployment or owned business ventures in the last 5 years, including any records or list of customers, "special customer lists" or "sugar daddy's list."
+
+[1][2] Discovery in civil cases must be relevant to the subject matter of the case and must be admissible or reasonably calculated to lead to admissible evidence. *See Allstate Insurance Co. v. Langston*, 655 So.2d 91 (Fla.1995); *Amente v. [REDACTED]*, 653 So.2d 1030 (Fla.1995); [REDACTED] v. *Stardust Cruisers, Inc.*, 690 So.2d 743 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997). The concept of relevancy is broader in the discovery context than in the trial context and a party may be permitted to discover evidence that would be inadmissible at trial, if it would lead to the discovery of relevant evidence. *Allstate; Amente*. Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280(b)(1) delineates the proper scope of discovery:
+
+*In General.* Parties may obtain discovery regarding any matter, not privileged, that is relevant to the subject matter of the pending action, whether it relates to the claim or defense of the party seeking discovery or the claim or defense of any other party, including the existence, description,
+
+nature, custody, condition, and location of any books, documents, or other tangible things and the identity and location of persons having knowledge of any discoverable matter. It is not ground for objection that the information sought will be inadmissible at the trial if the information sought appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.
+
+Nonetheless, the discovery of certain kinds of information may cause material injury of an irreparable nature. This includes the "cat-out-of-the-bag" material that could be used to injure another person or party outside the context of the litigation, material protected by privilege, trade secrets or work product. Discovery was never intended to be used as a tactical tool to harass, embarrass or annoy one's adversary. Rather, pretrial discovery was implemented to simplify the issues in a case, to eliminate the elements of surprise, to encourage the settlement of cases, to avoid the cost of litigation, and to achieve a balanced search for the truth to ensure a fair trial. *Elkins v. Syken*, 672 So.2d 517 (Fla.1996).
+
+Here the petitioners argue that the information sought to be discovered regarding prostitution and their sexual activities was propounded solely to embarrass them and to invade their right to privacy. The petitioners also claim that this information is privileged under section 796.09 and is not calculated to lead to evidence which would be admissible at trial.
+
+Section 796.09 provides a person with a civil cause of action for compensatory and punitive damages against anyone who coerces that person into prostitution, who coerces that person to remain in prostitution, or who uses coercion to collect or receive any part of that person's earnings derived from prostitution. In the course of litigation under this section, any transaction about which a plaintiff testifies or produces evidence does *not* subject the plaintiff to criminal prosecution or to any penalty or forfeiture. In addition, any testimony or evidence or any information produced by the plaintiff or wit-
+
+703 So.2d 1076  
+ 703 So.2d 1076, 22 Fla. L. Weekly D2375, 23 Fla. L. Weekly D169  
+ (Cite as: 703 So.2d 1076)
+
+Page 4
+
+ness for the plaintiffs cannot be used against the plaintiffs or witness in any other investigation or proceeding, except one for perjury.
+
+Section 796.09(5) specifically provides that it is *not* a defense that the plaintiff was paid or otherwise compensated for prostitution, that the plaintiff had engaged in prostitution prior to any involvement with the defendant or that the plaintiff made no attempt to escape from the defendant. Section 796.09(6) provides that convictions for prostitution or prostitution-related offenses are *inadmissible* for the purpose of attacking the plaintiffs' credibility.
+
+This legislation was the result of the Florida Supreme Court Gender Bias Study Commission, which conducted an extensive investigation of prostitution in this state. The Commission's activities included interviews with law enforcement and corrections personnel, \*1079 judges, public defenders, prosecutors, drug rehabilitation counselors, social workers, medical personnel, prostitutes, clients and pimps. The Commission found prostitution to be prevalent and uniform throughout the state and law enforcement largely unable to deter it under prevailing social attitudes and judicial practices. The Commission further found that prostitutes are often victims of economic, physical, and psychological coercion, that most persons do not chose to become prostitutes, but do so to survive, and that ninety percent of street prostitutes, both adult and children, are controlled by pimps who use a variety of coercive methods to maintain this control. The Commission determined that clients and pimps are rarely prosecuted and, when prosecuted, receive light sentences; whereas prostitutes, who are mainly females, are frequently prosecuted and receive harsher treatment in the courts. The Commission recommended changes in the methods of intervention in prostitution from punitive to therapeutic, changes in the law to require more equal treatment by the courts of the prostitute in relation to the client and the pimp and to lessen the incentive to traffic in human flesh by giving the prostitute access to the judicial system without first having to be
+
+arrested.
+
+Under section 796.09, the petitioners' prior involvement in prostitution and their earnings from prostitution would be irrelevant. Hence discovery should not be permitted because such information would not be admissible at trial nor would it be reasonably calculated to lead to evidence ultimately admissible at trial. Even though the scope of discovery is generally quite broad, section 796.09 is designed to encourage prostitutes to sue their pimps. Thus the usually broad scope of discovery may be constricted so that prostitutes will not be embarrassed, harassed or hindered in their actions.
+
+[3] Had the petitioners brought their lawsuit against Ruzzo and The Boardroom *only* under section 796.09, evidence of petitioners' past prostitution, including with the Boardroom, and their earnings relating to such activities, may not have been discoverable. However, the petitioners filed a multi-count complaint for compensatory and punitive damages, alleging numerous causes of action against the respondents. These other causes carry no such protection from discovery. Since the information sought by discovery may be relevant or may lead to the discovery of admissible evidence in one or more of these *other* causes of action or to determination of damages, we cannot conclude that the trial court departed from the essential requirements of law in granting this discovery. *See* [REDACTED] v. *TIB Bank of the Keys*, 687 So.2d 895 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) (by alleging fraud as well as breach of contract, purchaser placed at issue her reliance on venders' assertions, the veracity of financial documents she submitted to the vender, and the state of her mental health, including memory problems she was experiencing at the time of the alleged tortious conduct, thus deposition questions concerning her state of mind were relevant).
+
+Petition for Writ of Certiorari DENIED.
+
+THOMPSON, J., concurs.  
+ HARRIS, J., concurs specially with opinion.HARRIS, Judge, concurring specially:
+
+© 2009 Thomson Reuters/West. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.
+
+703 So.2d 1076, 22 Fla. L. Weekly D2375, 23 Fla. L. Weekly D169(Cite as: 703 So.2d 1076)There is a temptation in cases such as this to inquire which, the pot or the kettle, is imbued with the darker hue. Indeed that may ultimately be the question uppermost in the jurors' minds. But the issue presently before us is simply whether the pot, in order to establish the parties' comparative complexion, may discover the historical condition and the inherent characteristics of the kettle.
+
+We are here involved with parties that the limited record before us indicates were co-conspirators in a joint effort to violate Florida's laws against prostitution. The defendants are the owner/operators of a "social club" whose primary service is prostitution; the plaintiffs are employees of the club who provide such services. The employees are suing the owner/operators for, among other counts, taking advantage of their vulnerabilities ("coercing" them to be prostitutes) through manipulation and exploitation. In order to prepare a defense to the action, defendants have filed certain interrogatories for the employees to answer. These interrogatories\*1080 request such information as how long the employees have been engaged in prostitution; how the employees have been affected by the defendants' conduct; copies of photographs, movies, and videotapes in which the employees have performed sexual acts or simulated sexual acts; the names of previous employers and previous rates of pay; and a statement of income received from defendants. These interrogatories survived the employees' objections. I agree certiorari should be denied.
+
+The employees' primary cause of action is based on section 796.09(1), Florida Statutes, which provides:
+
+- (1) A person has a cause of action for compensatory and punitive damages against:
+  - (a) A person who coerces that person into prostitution;
+  - (b) A person who coerces that person to remain in prostitution, or
+  - (c) A person who uses coercion to collect or receive
+
+any part of that person's earnings derived from prostitution.
+
+The employees resist discovery of their past prostitution or their past or present earning experience on the basis of subparagraph 5 of section 796.09:
+
+(5) It does not constitute a defense to a complaint under this section that:
+
+- a) The plaintiff was paid or otherwise compensated for acts of prostitution;
+- b) The plaintiff engaged in acts of prostitution prior to any involvement with the defendant ...
+
+But the question before us is not whether prior acts of prostitution (or the receipts of earnings therefrom) which might be revealed by answering the interrogatories could be used as a defense to the complaint, but rather whether evidence of such conduct or such earnings would be relevant in determining whether the employees were, in fact, "coerced" into prostitution, into remaining prostitutes, or into sharing the proceeds of their services with defendants. The relevancy of this information depends, of course, on what constitutes coercion.
+
+If we apply the definition of "coercion" which is commonly accepted, then the relevancy of the requested information is apparent and this appeal has no merit at all. Webster defines "coercion" as: (1) to restrain or dominate by force, (2) to compel an act or choice, or (3) to enforce or bring about by force or threat. In sexual battery cases, the legislature has adopted the common meaning of the word "coercion" and has even placed limits on it. It has provided that consent will not be recognized if submission is *coerced* by threats of force or violence *if* the victim reasonably believes the perpetrator has the present ability to execute the threat.<sup>791</sup> Consent also will not be recognized if submission is *coerced* by a threat of retaliation against the victim or another *if* the victim reasonably believes that the perpetrator has the ability to execute the threat in the future.<sup>792</sup> And in sexual battery cases, the legislature has vitiated what might otherwise be con-
+
+© 2009 Thomson Reuters/West. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.
+
+703 So.2d 1076, 22 Fla. L. Weekly D2375, 23 Fla. L. Weekly D169
+
+(Cite as: 703 Sold 1076)
+
+sidered as consensual if one exploits a known physical or mental weakness of the victim to achieve his or her goal or takes advantage of one who is physically helpless or involuntarily intoxicated." Therefore, even in sexual battery cases, before coercion or exploitation will vitiate consent, the free will of the victim must be overcome by force or threat or some unfortunate circumstance suffered by the victim.
+
+> FNI. Section 794.011(4)(b), Florida Statutes.
+
+> FN2. Section 794.01I(4)(c), Florida Statutes.
+
+FN3. Section 794.011(4)(a),(d),(e), and (f), Florida Statutes.
+
+But then we get to the definition of "coercion" contained in section 796.09(3):
+
+:3) As used in this section, the term "coercion" means any practice of dominion, restraint, or inducement for the purpose of or with the reasonably foreseeable effect of causing another person to engage in or remain in prostitution or to relinquish earnings derived from prostitution, and includes, but is not limited to:
+
+,a) 1 Physical force or threats of physical force
+
+:b) Physical or mental torture.
+
+:c) Kidnapping.
+
+'1081 (d) Blackmail.
+
+,'e) Extortion or claims of indebtedness.
+
+:f) Threats of legal complaint or report of delinquency.
+
+,'g) Threat to interfere with parental rights or responsibilities, whether by judicial or administrative action or otherwise.
+
+:h) Promise of legal benefit.
+
+',I) Promise of greater financial rewards.
+
+'j) Promise of marriage.
+
+:k) Restraint of Speech or communications with others.
+
+1,/ ) Exploitation of a condition of developmental disability, cognitive limitation, affective disorder, or substance dependency.
+
+1,m) Exploitation of victimization by sexual abuse.
+
+:n) Exploitation of pornographic performance.
+
+:o) Exploitation of human needs for food, shelter, safety, or affection.
+
+The definition urged by the employees herein is the "promise of a greater financial reward." Whether the requested information is relevant to the issue of coercion in this case will depend on what the legislature intended by subsection (I) in the meaning of "coercion."
+
+I agree with Judge Altenbemd's thoughtful analysis in State v. Brigham, 694 So.2d 793 (1997):
+
+There can be no dispute that the legislature's unusual definition of "percent" is not a common dictionary definition. This is perhaps an appropriate case in which to remind ourselves of Learned Hand's famous observation that a "mature and developed jurisprudence" does not "make a fortress out of the dictionary."
+
+But even so, one would expect some nexus between the commonly accepted meaning of a word and the definition of that word ascribed by the legislature. If, for example, the legislature defined "canine" as including cats, although one might, jurisprudentially speaking, expect to hear a meow emanate from a Great Dane, the courts should nevertheless closely examine the legislative history to see if that is really what the legislature intended. The court in Young v. O'Keefe, 246 Iowa 1182, 69 N.W.2d 534, 537 (1955), stated this principle as follows: "But
+
+703 So.2d 1076  
+ 703 So.2d 1076, 22 Fla. L. Weekly D2375, 23 Fla. L. Weekly D169  
+ (Cite as: 703 So.2d 1076)
+
+Page 7
+
+before a definition is construed so as to expand the meaning of a well-known word to include its antonym ..., the intention of the legislature to that effect must be clear." As Judge [REDACTED] observed in *Catron v. Roger Bohn, D.C., P.A.*, 580 So.2d 814, 818 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991):
+
+It is our primary duty to give effect to legislative intent and, if a literal interpretation of a statute leads to unreasonable results, then we should exercise our power to interpret reason and logic to it.
+
+\* \* \* \* \*
+
+Unfortunately, it is apparent that in enacting this legislation, the legislature has, without redefining the terms for the purposes of this legislation, often used terms with commonly accepted meanings for purposes at great variance from those commonly accepted meanings.
+
+In our case, the legislature did define the term for the purpose of the act. But because the term (coercion) as so defined can be interpreted two ways-one consistent with the commonly accepted meaning and one at variance-we should not accept the "antonym" unless such legislative intent is clear. A free will decision, even if based on a hope of financial gain, is the opposite of a coerced decision.
+
+The employees urge that the mere promise of a greater reward brings them within the act. But if the mere promise of a greater reward is sufficient to establish coercion, then anyone who makes a voluntary and reasoned exercise of free will motivated by the hope of economic gain has been coerced. This definition removes the element of compulsion implicit in the commonly accepted meaning of coercion and substitutes therefor the mere desire for financial gain. The employees herein assert that since they were offered "a greater financial reward" for providing the services performed by them through defendants' establishment, they were coerced into their prostitution activities. This equates the giving
+
+of an opportunity to make a decision with the coercion of that decision. But subsection (I) can also mean \*1082 that the promise of a greater reward is coercion *only if* such promised reward is sufficient to overcome one's natural revulsion to selling one's body for money. If there is no such revulsion, there can be no coercion. Becoming a prostitute only because one likes the hours and wages or "because it beats the heck out of working for a living" simply should not meet the test of section 796.09(1).
+
+At oral argument herein, it was suggested without contradiction, that at least one of the employees has a college degree and gave up a well-paying, legitimate job in order to engage in this profession for the greater reward. Section 796.09 does not appear to be a general prostitute's relief act. It is based on a report by the Gender Bias Study Commission which recommended the equalization of treatment in relation to the prostitute, the client and the "pimp." It is based on the premise that prostitutes are generally victims of economic, physical, and psychological coercion and choose prostitution in order to survive. Further, the Commission was concerned that 90 percent of the street prostitutes are controlled by "pimps" who use a variety of coercive methods to maintain control. It seems clear that the legislature was not intending to depart from the precepts of the commonly understood meaning of "coercion" and to redefine it to include both free will decisions and compelled decisions.. The interpretation urged by the employees seems at variance with the stated goal of the legislature and the Gender Bias Commission.
+
+Since there is no cause of action provided for one who makes a reasoned and voluntary exercise of their free will to enter or continue in the profession solely for financial rewards (assuming "coercion" is given the definition more consistent with its commonly accepted meaning and assuming that my interpretation of legislative intent is correct), coercion becomes the critical issue in the trial of such action. The interrogatories propounded by defendants appear relevant to the issue of coercion.
+
+703 So.2d 1076, 22 Fla. L. Weekly D2375, 23 Fla. L. Weekly D169(Cite as: 703 So.2d 1076)This is a case of first impression based on a relatively new statute. As indicated, the legislative history of the new law suggests that the statute is designed to assist those who were forced to enter prostitution in order to keep a roof over their heads or food on their table. It does not appear to be intended to aid those who voluntarily enter the profession in order to drive a Mercedes instead of a ██████. The limited record before us indicates that even beginning employees of the defendants (those who do not have an established clientele) bring in \$700 a day and can keep 50% of their earnings. Based on a five-day work week, this would reflect an income of \$87,500 a year even with a two week vacation. And the employees herein are not beginners.
+
+There is no indication that the legislature intended to legalize prostitution or to make it a respectable profession. It merely intended to place the prostitute on the same footing with the client and the "pimp." If a prostitute voluntarily makes the decision to participate, free from force, intimidation, or disadvantageous circumstance, then he or she is on the same footing as the other participants and should be treated the same.
+
+Although it might well serve a legitimate public purpose to permit the cannibalistic demise of such enterprises (and I am not unsympathetic with this view), that does not appear to be the policy behind the current statute. Therefore, in cases where coercion is not present (and this may or may not be one), the court should continue its tradition of not interceding in civil conflicts involving transactions that are either illegal or are against public policy. *See Wechsler v. Novak*, 157 Fla. 703, 26 So.2d 884 (1946); ██████ v. *Ratiner*, 462 So.2d 1157, 1160 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984), *rev. denied*, 472 So.2d 1182 (Fla.1985) ("An action may lie for interference with an unenforceable contract and even perhaps a voidable contract. No such cause of action lies for interference with a contract *void* as against public policy [another's representation of a client obtained by a doctor/lawyer's illegal personal injury solicitation
+
+in the hospital] and which makes one who is a party thereto, as the appellant in the instant case, guilty of a criminal act for entering into such an agreement.")
+
+We are not asked in this proceeding to rule on the admissibility of the discovered information as evidence at the trial of this cause. We are to determine only if the information might lead to admissible evidence. Even \*1083 though we deny the Writ I suggest we certify the following question:
+
+DOES ONE, FREE FROM FORCE, INTIMIDATION, OR DISADVANTAGEOUS CIRCUMSTANCE, WHO MAKES A REASONED DECISION TO BECOME OR REMAIN A PROSTITUTE OR TO SHARE THE PROCEEDS THEREOF BECAUSE OF A PROMISE OF A GREATER FINANCIAL REWARD HAVE A CAUSE OF ACTION UNDER SECTION 796.09(1), FLORIDA STATUTES?
+
+*ON MOTIONS FOR REHEARING, FOR CLARIFICATION, FOR CERTIFICATION, AND FOR REHEARING EN BANC*
+
+W. SHARP, Judge.
+
+Petitioners Balas and Shumate have filed motions for rehearing, clarification and certification. We deny the motions in full except for one regard. We delete the sentence in the last full paragraph of the opinion which reads: "These other causes of action carry no such protection from discovery."
+
+Motion for Clarification GRANTED as stated above; Motion for Rehearing and Certification DENIED.
+
+HARRIS and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.
+
+Fla.App. 5 Dist.,1997.
+
+Balas v. Ruzzo
+
+703 So.2d 1076, 22 Fla. L. Weekly D2375, 23 Fla. L. Weekly D169
+
+END OF DOCUMENT
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739674/EFTA02739674.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739674/EFTA02739674.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..69ac26b9f95110821fe7fc7eb6ae68e658afc9c8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739674/EFTA02739674.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,495 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739674.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 8,
+  "chars": 30142,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 18.87,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "[3] Pretrial Procedure 307A \u270936.1",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            321.3,
+            205.74
+          ],
+          [
+            485.31600000000003,
+            205.74
+          ],
+          [
+            485.31600000000003,
+            217.89000000000004
+          ],
+          [
+            321.3,
+            217.89000000000004
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "West Headnotes",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            146.88,
+            409.04999999999995
+          ],
+          [
+            217.26,
+            409.04999999999995
+          ],
+          [
+            217.26,
+            421.20000000000005
+          ],
+          [
+            146.88,
+            421.20000000000005
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "[2] Pretrial Procedure 307A \u270931",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            70.38,
+            562.9499999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            229.5,
+            562.9499999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            229.5,
+            579.15
+          ],
+          [
+            70.38,
+            579.15
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "I.",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            426.56399999999996,
+            324.81000000000006
+          ],
+          [
+            438.804,
+            324.81000000000006
+          ],
+          [
+            438.804,
+            336.15
+          ],
+          [
+            426.56399999999996,
+            336.15
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "II.",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            424.72799999999995,
+            392.04
+          ],
+          [
+            440.64,
+            392.04
+          ],
+          [
+            440.64,
+            403.38
+          ],
+          [
+            424.72799999999995,
+            403.38
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "III.",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            423.5039999999999,
+            491.66999999999996
+          ],
+          [
+            443.70000000000005,
+            491.66999999999996
+          ],
+          [
+            443.70000000000005,
+            503.01
+          ],
+          [
+            423.5039999999999,
+            503.01
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "IV.",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            423.5039999999999,
+            582.39
+          ],
+          [
+            443.70000000000005,
+            582.39
+          ],
+          [
+            443.70000000000005,
+            592.92
+          ],
+          [
+            423.5039999999999,
+            592.92
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "V.",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            174.42,
+            202.5
+          ],
+          [
+            187.272,
+            202.5
+          ],
+          [
+            187.272,
+            213.03000000000003
+          ],
+          [
+            174.42,
+            213.03000000000003
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "VI.",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            171.972,
+            302.94
+          ],
+          [
+            189.108,
+            302.94
+          ],
+          [
+            189.108,
+            313.47
+          ],
+          [
+            171.972,
+            313.47
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "ON MOTIONS FOR REHEARING, FOR CLARIFICATION, FOR CERTIFICATION, AND FOR REHEARING EN BANC",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            324.36,
+            348.29999999999995
+          ],
+          [
+            539.784,
+            348.29999999999995
+          ],
+          [
+            539.784,
+            381.51
+          ],
+          [
+            324.36,
+            381.51
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            43
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            9
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            3
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            23
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            3
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            20
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            3
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            23
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            3
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            143
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            80
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            21
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            3
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            30
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739674"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739682/EFTA02739682.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739682/EFTA02739682.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c23781718ec47eb26b5f98216b5590b869701955
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739682/EFTA02739682.md
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
+IN THE COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH  
+JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM  
+BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
+
+A.C.,
+
+CASE NO. 502008CA025129XXXXMB AI
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+v.
+
+JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, and [REDACTED]  
+[REDACTED]
+
+Defendants.
+
+ORDER ON DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO  
+FIRST REQUEST TO PRODUCE TO PLAINTIFF AND TO OVERRULE  
+PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS, & FOR DEFENDANT'S EXPENSES,  
+INCLUDING ATTORNEYS' FEES
+
+THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Defendant Epstein's Motion To  
+Compel Responses To First Request To Produce To Plaintiff And To Overrule  
+Plaintiff's Objections, & For Defendant's Expenses, Including Attorneys' Fees  
+and the Court having heard argument of counsel and being fully advised in these  
+premises, it is hereby
+
+ORDERED and ADJUDGED that Defendant's Motion is hereby granted/  
+denied as to # 17 + # 18, and denied  
+as to # 22 as phrased. Response to  
+be ~~for~~ served w/in 10 days.
+
+DONE AND ORDERED at Palm Beach County Courthouse, West Palm  
+Beach, Florida, this 23 day of Feb, 2008.
+
+![]()Copies furnished:  
+ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ., and MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ., 515 North Flagler Drive, Suite 400, West Palm Beach,  
+FL 33401; JACK SCAROLA, ESQ., AND JACK P. [REDACTED], ESQ., Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart &  
+Shipley, P.A., 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West Palm Beach, FL 33409, and JACK A.  
+GOLDBERGER, ESQ., Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A., One Clearlake Centre, Suite 1400, 250  
+Australian Avenue South, West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+
+EXHIBIT "B"
+
+CC JEN & DT  
+2/22/09 +  
+= 3/0
+
+IN THE COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH  
+JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM  
+BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
+
+A.C.,
+
+CASE NO. 502008CA025129XXXXMB AI
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+v.
+
+JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, and [REDACTED]  
+[REDACTED],
+
+Defendants.
+
+\_\_\_\_\_/
+
+ORDER ON DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO COMPEL ANSWERS TO  
+INTERROGATORIES AND TO OVERRULE PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS, & FOR  
+DEFENDANT'S EXPENSES, INCLUDING ATTORNEYS' FEES
+
+THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Defendant Epstein's Motion To  
+Compel Answers To Interrogatories And To Overrule Plaintiff's Objections, & For  
+Defendant's Expenses, Including Attorneys' Fees, and the Court having heard  
+argument of counsel and being fully advised in these premises, it is hereby
+
+ORDERED and ADJUDGED that Defendant's Motion is hereby granted/  
+~~denied~~ as to #5, 12 #18, denied as  
+to #2. Responses to be served w/in  
+10 days.
+
+DONE AND ORDERED at Palm Beach County Courthouse, West Palm  
+Beach, Florida, this 23 day of Feb, 2009
+
+![]()Edward A. Garrison  
+Circuit Judge
+
+Copies furnished:  
+ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ., and MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ., 515 North Flagler Drive, Suite 400, West Palm Beach,  
+FL 33401; JACK SCAROLA, ESQ., AND JACK P. [REDACTED], ESQ., Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart &  
+Shipley, P.A., 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West Palm Beach, FL 33409, and JACK A.  
+GOLDBERGER, ESQ., Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A., One Clearlake Centre, Suite 1400, 250  
+Australian Avenue South, West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+
+CC: JEN6, DE  
+CC: Joe Benzer  
+mailed to [REDACTED]  
+3/05
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739682/EFTA02739682.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739682/EFTA02739682.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..01ae7d9134bfb4751b9a9885b686d94fdcd9fd43
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739682/EFTA02739682.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,155 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739682.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 2,
+  "chars": 3044,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 7.3,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "ORDER ON DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO FIRST REQUEST TO PRODUCE TO PLAINTIFF AND TO OVERRULE PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS, & FOR DEFENDANT'S EXPENSES, INCLUDING ATTORNEYS' FEES",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            96.696,
+            281.88
+          ],
+          [
+            500.0039999999999,
+            281.88
+          ],
+          [
+            500.0039999999999,
+            332.90999999999997
+          ],
+          [
+            96.696,
+            332.90999999999997
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "ORDER ON DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO COMPEL ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES AND TO OVERRULE PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS, & FOR DEFENDANT'S EXPENSES, INCLUDING ATTORNEYS' FEES",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            94.86,
+            281.88
+          ],
+          [
+            502.45199999999994,
+            281.88
+          ],
+          [
+            502.45199999999994,
+            320.76
+          ],
+          [
+            94.86,
+            320.76
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            96
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            36
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            29
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "Caption",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            75
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            33
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "Caption",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739682"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739684/EFTA02739684.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739684/EFTA02739684.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c6142758c464ee19aaa581b7ca4792456b52eaf1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739684/EFTA02739684.md
@@ -0,0 +1,285 @@
+## IN THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 50 2008CA020614XXXXMB AF
+
+JANE DOE II,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN and
+
+Defendants.
+
+COPY
+
+COURT REPORTER'S TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS HAD BEFORE THE HONORABLE DIANA
+
+DATE: March 3, 2009
+
+PLACE: Palm Beach County Courthouse 205 N. Dixie Highway West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
+
+> U.S. Legal Support (561) 835-0220
+
+../1 II EXHIBIT C.
+
+z
+
+## APPEARANCES:
+
+LAW FIRM, P.A. 224 Datura Avenue Suite 900 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Counsel for Plaintiff BY: ISIDRO M. , ESQUIRE
+
+BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN 515 N. Flagler Drive Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Counsel for Defendant BY: ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQUIRE
+
+that but I'd just like to do that.
+
+THE COURT: Right. And if you want to contact the other individuals saying, you know, I'm the one that's questioning whether or not these need to be before one judge. You may have a different perspective than your colleagues who are prosecuting some of the cases.
+
+I understand the damages. I'm not saying consolidate. I'm saying transfer. It's not a consolidation issue. Everybody gets that confused for some reason. The words are very different out of my mouth, your mouth and how they're written.
+
+So let me go ahead and take a gander at this. I did read it last night. I'm not sure that we need to get -- we need names?
+
+MR. CRITTON: Right. Well, here's what some of the issues are is that, as an example -- if I could approach the bench.
+
+THE COURT: Sure.
+
+MR. CRITTON: This is some of the information that we've obtained through discovery from some of the -- from at least in this instance, it would be this particular Jane Doe.
+
+THE COURT: You know who Jane Doe is I take
+
+it?
+
+MR. CRITTON: Right.
+
+THE COURT: You know who the Jane Doe is?
+
+MR. CRITTON: Yes, correct. And so this particular lady has kept in part a diary and she -- which appears to have started some time this is not in any way significant -- but some time after she learned that she could file a lawsuit. I think she's also been to Oakwood Center some time after she learned she could file a lawsuit and seek damages from Mr. Epstein.
+
+There's no history of this lady beforehand other than in some of the Oakwood records where she was Baker Acted, she started drinking beer at 16, she started Xanax at 16, started marijuana at 15, that she's sexually active.
+
+So how she has interacted -- she has a claim for emotional damages, mental pain and anguish, psychiatric-type damages. How she's interacted with friends, with family, the events in her life, school, work, her interpersonal relationships both with men and let's -- we'll use an example men here, but other individuals. She's saying that this event with Mr. Epstein,
+
+this sexual assault and whatever occurred during these events is that -- has caused her damage.
+
+And therefore damages in the case such as the emotional, mental, psychiatric-type damages are completely subjective, I mean separate and apart from any medical bills that may be -- which are clearly intangible. So these are intangible damages. And the jury is instructed, you know, you advise the greater weight of the evidence, what's fair and reasonable under the circumstances.
+
+So what we would have is basically this young lady's testimony as to what she claims her damages are and what the circumstances are with her situation with Mr. Epstein. She claims on page 13, you know, I love this guy, I'm dating this guy Chris. On page 15 --
+
+THE COURT: Is this part of a diary for treatment?
+
+MR. CRITTON: I have no idea what it is. It was just produced in response to discovery. And she apparently started in, I think this is December of '08. You know I took Jay Lyntenis' girl to the zoo, had an amazing day, I love her, i.e., the girl. We have so much fun. I want a
+
+baby especially with him. Okay. So I know who this person is. We are all so open together, I love him and Jay and , what do I do with Chris, who is another guy in her life.
+
+All right. This is circumstances where this young lady is saying, look, Jeffrey Epstein has ruined my life from a damage standpoint, okay. Let me depose other individuals with whom you've had a relationship. And what if it turns out -- as with some of these girls did -- is they had relationships or had escapades or circumstances with individuals, older men similar to Mr. Epstein well before Mr. Epstein.
+
+And this girl, I don't know one way or the other, but let's assume she had a situation where she was assaulted or molested or raped, ' that all is going to affect her emotional and her mental pain and anguish and it will all factor into evaluating damages.
+
+You know, it's not something that I'm going to spread around. I'm happy to keep it, you know, within the confines of the discovery of this case. But if she says every other relationship in my life has been perfect but Jeff Epstein has done this to me and it has affected
+
+my ability to trust men and my sexual relationships with other men, which is part of her interpersonal relationships, okay, let's talk to
+
+THE COURT: When does your client allege that she had her first encounter with Mr. Epstein?
+
+MR. : At what age?
+
+THE COURT: Well, what year?
+
+MR. CRITTON: June of '03.
+
+MR. : June of '03, Judge.
+
+MR. CRITTON: She claims from June of '03 through November of '04.
+
+MR. : She was I believe 16 at the beginning and ended at 17. She was a minor during all this time.
+
+THE COURT: June of '03 to now is six years.
+
+Let me hear from Mr.
+
+MR. : Judge, in the criminal case that was filed against Mr. Epstein, he would not have had a right to do this type of discovery and I -- if I could hand up --
+
+THE COURT: They wouldn't care about the women.
+
+MR. : Right. Well, I mean --
+
+1
+
+2
+
+3
+
+4
+
+5
+
+6
+
+7
+
+8
+
+9
+
+10
+
+11
+
+12
+
+13
+
+14
+
+15
+
+16
+
+17
+
+18
+
+19
+
+20
+
+21
+
+22
+
+23
+
+24
+
+25
+
+THE COURT: This is damages. There's no - they weren't seeking damages at the time.
+
+MR. .: Right. And we have not alleged in the complaint or in the answers to interrogatories that her ability to have <sup>a</sup> relationship with <sup>a</sup>man has been affected by Mr. Epstein's conduct.
+
+We have alleged that she has been hospitalized for depression, anxiety but we have not alleged any damages concerning -- the only reason this would be relevant is if we were making a claim at her ability to have either sexual relations or to have emotional relations with men was effected by her experience with Mr. Epstein.
+
+So this damages' claim is just a smoke screen to attempt to get evidence to show the jury that this woman has had other consensual relationships with young men that are approximately her age what I would characterize as a slut defense. She had it coming to her because she engaged in other voluntarily consensual --
+
+THE COURT: Mr. Critton wouldn't try the slut defense in my courtroom, I'm sure.
+
+1 2 3 MR. : Maybe not, but certainly that's the way this discovery is going. And, Judge, what --
+
+4 5 THE COURT: What are the damages you think your client is seeking?
+
+6 7 8 10 11 12 13 MR. : She is seeking emotional distress damages for depression and anxiety and she has been hospitalized at the Oakwood Center. Her friend -- she was on the phone to a friend who called the sheriff's office because she thought she was suicidal. The sheriffs responded. They Baker Acted her that day and they took her eventually to the Oakwood Center.
+
+14 15 16 THE COURT: How do we know it's not intertwined with her rejection by three other men since Mr. Epstein?
+
+17 18 19 MR. : Well, even if it was related to her rejection by three other men -- you mean other men's rejection of her?
+
+20 21 22 23 THE COURT: Yeah. Well, how do you not know that? I mean you can't do it until you do discovery. Has anybody attempted to review the records from Oakwood to find out what's going on?
+
+24 25 MR. CRITTON: It's like a one-time visit when she was Baker Acted and then there's some
+
+other --
+
+THE COURT: She didn't receive treatment?
+
+MR. CRITTON: She received treatment for that day and she's been back a couple of times. She's on medication. Again, I don't know what or the extent but she's got -- her medical bills are de minimis.
+
+Again as an example, Judge, did the Court have an opportunity to look at the case that I also attached to the motion? Because there's a case that's almost on all fours with this which I attached to our motion which is called Belles versus Russo.
+
+THE COURT: Right.
+
+MR. CRITTON: It was a case where the plaintiff was sued -- the plaintiff sued the former owners of a house of prostitution. So that part is different, but within it there were a number of claims including a sexual assault claim and they sought emotional pain, humiliation and emotional distress.
+
+Within the complaint that was filed in this particular case, she is seeking severe emotional distress, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, past and future, compensatory
+
+humiliation, loss of reputation, mental anguish, pain and suffering, the same type of damages. And what the Court said --
+
+THE COURT: How old is she now?
+
+MR. : She's 21 now.
+
+MR. CRITTON: She's 21 now. What the Court said is, you know, if you'd only brought this claim under 796 evidence of past issues, it's not an issue. You can't use this defense for anything, but because you brought these other claims which include, you know, sexual assault and you're seeking damages for other causes of action since the information sought by discovery may be relevant or may lead to the discovery of admissible evidence in one or more of the other causes of action or determination of damages, we cannot conclude the trial court parted from essential requirements of law in granting --
+
+THE COURT: So in other words, she's not only seeking -- she's seeking current emotional damage as a result of this relationship and you're trying to find out if she had prior relationships that perhaps could be intertwined with it so that it's not just Mr. Epstein's --
+
+MR. CRITTON: Right. A perfect example is
+
+one of the cases that I have is there's <sup>a</sup>young lady who claims that she was molested in the past and raped, pretty significant issues, well in advance of her even meeting with Mr. Epstein. And they seem to play a large role in her psychiatric and psychological evaluation.
+
+We're going to come to the Court in this case as we have others and ask for <sup>a</sup> psychological evaluation of this lady, and if she was raped or if she was molested or just she had <sup>a</sup>bad experience or some -- whether it was <sup>a</sup> young or old man assaulted her in some fashion, that may play a role in her damages and what --
+
+THE COURT: What I'm going to allow for discovery purposes only not necessarily getting it in at the time trial are two years before her first encounter with Mr. Epstein and anything subsequent.
+
+MR. IIIIII: Judge, I just wanted to say on the record because I forgot to mention it, there's also -- I did state an objection to the identity of people that are unrepresented in this courtroom. They have rights too. So what I --
+
+THE COURT: Well, my suggestion is that you send those people a letter and tell them that
+
+you're going to disclose them and if they have <sup>a</sup> problem with it that they come to see me before you disclose it.
+
+So I'm going to give you 20 days to respond to this rather than the usual five and that will give you time to put these people on notice and if they want to come visit with me and have a John Doe, I'll have aJohn Doe hearing but, you know, this is her case. She's doing it. She's the one seeking damages, and he is entitled to be able to confront other individuals to find out information that may be relevant to the damages she's seeking or she can drop the damages. That's her choice. If you seek damages, you've got to do it -- if you could put that in an order so that we have atime for him to do this.
+
+Just fill out an order, hand it back up to me and I'll deal with it.
+
+(The proceedings were concluded.)
+
+1
+
+2
+
+3
+
+4
+
+5
+
+6
+
+7
+
+8
+
+9
+
+10
+
+11
+
+12
+
+13
+
+14
+
+15
+
+16
+
+17
+
+18
+
+19
+
+20
+
+21
+
+22
+
+23
+
+24
+
+25
+
+THE STATE COUNTY OF OF FLORIDA, PALM BEACH.
+
+REPORTER'S CERTIFICATE
+
+I, Teresa Bell, Court Reporter, certify that <sup>I</sup>was authorized to and did stenographically report the foregoing proceedings and that the transcript is <sup>a</sup> true and complete record of my stenographic notes.
+
+<sup>I</sup>further certify that the proceedings were taken at the time and place shown herein and that all counsel and persons as hereinabove shown were present.
+
+<sup>I</sup>further certify that I am not arelative, employee, attorney or counsel of any of the parties, nor am I arelative or employee of any of the parties' attorney or counsel connected with the action, nor am <sup>I</sup>financially interested in the action.
+
+Dated this 11th day
+
+TERESK BELL, Court Reporter
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739684/EFTA02739684.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739684/EFTA02739684.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b3c9dcc60384855a2ccc71082fd7cd445a9d5a0d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739684/EFTA02739684.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,555 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739684.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 14,
+  "chars": 12860,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.81,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "IN THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT \nIN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA \nCASE NO. 50 2008CA020614XXXXMB AF",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            171.972,
+            81.0
+          ],
+          [
+            513.2236328125,
+            81.0
+          ],
+          [
+            513.2236328125,
+            145.4710693359375
+          ],
+          [
+            171.972,
+            145.4710693359375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "APPEARANCES:",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            123.01200000000001,
+            103.68
+          ],
+          [
+            235.57574462890625,
+            103.68
+          ],
+          [
+            235.57574462890625,
+            118.85107421875
+          ],
+          [
+            123.01200000000001,
+            118.85107421875
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            46
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            23
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            11
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            89
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            45
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            95
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            48
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            9
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            104
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            52
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            106
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            110
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            55
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            109
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            55
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            14
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            276
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            55
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            31
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            108
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            54
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 9,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            110
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            55
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 10,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            110
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            55
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 11,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            308
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            54
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 12,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            265
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            50
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 13,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            215
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            50
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            32
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739684"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739698/EFTA02739698.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739698/EFTA02739698.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a9b76d081b4ea0f4267498651523bf8dd5238f3a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739698/EFTA02739698.md
@@ -0,0 +1,167 @@
+#### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3
+
+Plaintiff, v.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+#### DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFF, JANE DOE NO. 3, TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S FIRST REQUEST TO PRODUCE & TO OVERRULE OBJECTIONS, & FOR AN AWARD OF DEFENDANTS REASONABLE EXPENSES
+
+Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, by and through his undersigned attorneys, moves this Court for an order compelling Plaintiff, JANE DOE No. 3 To respond to specified production requests and to overrule her objections asserted in Plaintiff's Responses To Defendant's First Request To Produce, dated January 26, 2009. Defendant further seeks an award of his reasonable expenses, including expenses, associated with the making of this motion. Rule 37, Fed.R.Civ.P. (2008); Local Gen. Rules 7.1 and 26.1 H (S.D. Fla. 2008). In support of his motion, Defendant states:
+
+### Introduction
+
+Prior to the filing of this motion, counsel for Defendant and counsel for Plaintiff corresponded with each other and were able to resolve some of the discovery issues related to Defendant's First Request to Produce and Plaintiffs Response thereto. By letter, dated March 3, 2009, the Plaintiff agreed to withdraw her "General Objections" set forth in her response. As well, issues as to production request no. 14 are presently resolved. This motion addresses those requests on which the parties were unable to
+
+come to an agreement.
+
+Also, Defendant has filed simultaneously with this motion a Motion To Compel directed to certain of Plaintiffs Answers to Defendant's First Set of Interrogatories, also dated January 26, 2009, and which addresses identical discovery issues. Both motions should be determined at the same time.
+
+#### Motion To Compel Responses to Nos. 1.10. 11. 17. & 18
+
+## Production Request No. 1
+
+1. Individual and/or joint income tax returns and supporting documentation including W-2 and 1099 forms for 2002-2007 and, as well as all records or documentation relative to the Plaintiffs earnings for the current year.
+
+## Response:
+
+Plaintiff objects to this request as overbroad, unduly burdensome, and not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence. Without waiving this objection, Plaintiff states that she has no such documents in her possession and agrees to provide Defendant's counsel with a signed IRS form 4506-T upon request.
+
+## Legal Argument Supporting Entitlement to Discovery Sought in No. 1
+
+Plaintiff does not make a relevancy objection, but instead claims that the request is "not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence." Plaintiff also claims that the request is "overbroad" and "unduly burdensome," but fails to make any showing whatsoever how the request is overbroad or unduly burdensome as required under Rule 26(c) and Local Gen. Rule 26.1 H (S.D. Fla. (2008). On its face, the six year time period of 2002-2007 for Plaintiffs tax return's and supporting documentation is reasonable. Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint alleges that the alleged sexual abuse and exploitation of her by Defendant occurred in "in 2004-2005." 2d Am. Complaint, ¶8.
+
+Plaintiff finally states "she has no such documents in her possession and agrees
+
+to provided Defendant's counsel with a signed IRS form 4506-T upon request." Defendant's counsel by faxed letter, dated March 30, 2009, requested that Plaintiff sign and submit two IRS Forms 4506-T requesting tax returns for Each of the years 2002 - 2007. In the event, Plaintiff complies with the request, Defendant will withdraw his motion to compel directed to request no. 1.
+
+Also, such information is both relevant and reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. It is well settled that relevant information is discoverable, even if not admissible at trial, so long as the discovery is reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Rule 26(b)(1), Fed.R.Civ.P.; Donahav v. Palm Beach Tours & trans., Inc., 242 F.R.D. 685 (S.D. Fla. 2007). Discoverability of such information is governed by Rule 26, Fed.R.Civ.P., pursuant to which the scope of discovery is broad. Donahav, supra, at 686, and cases cited therein. "Parties may obtain discovery regarding any matter, not privileged, which is relevant to the claims or defense of any party involved in the pending action." Id.
+
+Plaintiffs tax returns, along with the requested supporting documentation, for the six year period are relevant to Plaintiffs damages claims detailed below herein. Such information would show Plaintiffs employment and earning history, as well as provide evidence as to how Plaintiff has been able to function in her daily life before, during and after the alleged incident. Was she self-sufficient? Was she able to get out of bed each morning and support herself? What type of job did she hold? One's ability to earn a living and be self-supporting has not only a financial component, but also an emotional/psychological/mental component.
+
+In her Second Amended Complaint, Plaintiff attempts to allege claims in Count I
+
+for "Sexual Assault and Battery," Count II for "Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress," and in Count III for "Coercion and Enticement to Sexual Activity in Violation of 18 U.S.C.A. §2422," and seeks damages pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §2255(a). (Plaintiff alleges diversity of citizenship as a basis for this Court's jurisdiction. 2d Am. Complaint, ¶5). Counts I and II are brought pursuant to state law.
+
+In her complaint, Plaintiff alleges that "she has suffered and will continue to suffer severe and permanent traumatic injuries, including mental, psychological and emotional damages," and "severe mental anguish and pain." She also seeks compensatory damages for her alleged injuries. 2d Am. Complaint,¶¶21, 27, 33, and 'Wherefore" clauses. In her answers to interrogatories nos. 9 and 10, Plaintiff further states that:
+
+Plaintiff has suffered severe psychological and emotional injuries, including without limitation, anxiety, depression, suicidal ideation, guilt, self-blame, feelings of being degraded, feeling unattractive, diminished sense of femininity, fluctuations in weight/appetite, sexual intimacy problems, flashbacks, disturbing memories, stress, irritability, feelings of being isolated and trapped, diminished trust, social problems, problems in personal relationships, indecisiveness, lower energy, lower ambition and initiative, headaches, back pain, feels stress (particularly around men), obsessive thoughts, problems concentrating, alcohol abuse, corruption of morals and values, loss of innocence, and cries a lot. (Interrog. No. 9).
+
+... she seeks damages arising from her psychological and emotional injuries. These damages include pain and suffering, costs of psychological care and treatment, and loss of earning capacity. ... (lnterrog. No. 10).
+
+As discussed above, the tax returns, and supporting documentation, will provide direct evidence as to Plaintiff's claimed damages, not only her loss of earning capacity claim, but also her emotional/psychological/mental health type damages. The time period will allow Defendant to compare how Plaintiff was doing in her life prior to, during, and after the alleged incident. Accordingly, Plaintiff's objection is required to be overruled, and Defendant is entitled to the documents requested.
+
+## Production Requests Nos. 10, 11. 17. & 18
+
+10. All photographs, movies, dvds, and videotapes in which you performed sexual acts or simulated sexual acts.
+
+11. All photographs, movies, dvds, and videotapes in which you performed sexual acts or simulated sexual acts in exchange for money or other consideration.
+
+17. All documents reflecting the names and addresses of other individuals with whom you have had sexual activity from January 1, 2000 — December 31, 2005.
+
+18. All documents reflecting the names and addresses of other individuals with whom you have had sexual activity from January 1, 2006 through November 30, 2008.
+
+Plaintiff asserted the identical answer to each of the above stated interrogatories:
+
+## Response:
+
+Plaintiff objects to this request as harassing and not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence. Moreover, this interrogatory [sic] is outrageous, offensive and is apparently posed for the purpose of intimidating the Plaintiff. Any evidence that could conceivably be obtained through this request would not be admissible under Fed.R.Evid.412. Without waiving this objection, none to Plaintiff's knowledge.
+
+# Legal Argument Supporting Entitlement to Discovery Sought in 10, 11, 17, & 18
+
+Plaintiff does not make a relevancy objection, but instead claims that the requests are "not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence," claiming that such "evidence ... would not be admissible under Fed.R.Evid. 412." Plaintiff further claims, without making any showing in her answer and without moving for a protective order in accordance with Rule 26(c) and Local Gen. Rule 26.1 H (S.D. Fla. 2008), that the interrogatory is "harassing,' "outrageous, offensive and is apparently posed for the purpose of intimidating Plaintiff." See Defendant's Motion to Compel directed to Plaintiff's Answers to Defendant's First Set of Interrogatories, addressing identical discovery issues. Both Defendant's interrogatories and production requests seek information regarding Plaintiff's sexual conduct and history; Plaintiff
+
+raised the same objections.
+
+In each of her responses, Plaintiff also states that — "Without waiving this objection, none to Plaintiffs knowledge." Plaintiff's response is evasive — either the requested items exist or do not existed. Defendant is entitled to a better response specifically indicating whether the items requested in each of the production requests nos. 10, 11, 17, and 18 — (1) exist or do not exist; (2) are in the possession or control of Plaintiff or some other person that Plaintiff is able to identify; and (3) why Plaintiff qualifies her answer of "none" with the phrase "to Plaintiff's knowledge." (Did such items exist and Plaintiff destroyed or deleted them?)
+
+As to the relevance of the information sought, it is well settled that relevant information is discoverable, even if not admissible at trial, so long as the discovery is reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Rule 26(b)(1), Fed.R.Civ.P.; Donahay v. Palm Beach Tours & trans., Inc., 242 F.R.D. 685 (S.D. Fla. 2007). Contrary to Plaintiff's assertion, Rule 412 does not automatically result in a determination that such sexual history and sexual activity/behavior information is never admissible. In fact, written into the Rule are the procedures to follow in determining when such information is admissible at trial. The Advisory Committee Notes to Rule 412, Fed.R.Evid, makes clear that the procedures to determine admissibility of an alleged victim's/plaintiffs sexual conduct or activity in civil cases does not apply to discovery of such information. Rather, discoverability of such information is governed by Rule 26, Fed.R.Civ.P., pursuant to which the scope of discovery is broad. Donahav, supra, at 686, and cases cited therein. "Parties may obtain discovery regarding any matter, not privileged, which is relevant to the claims or defense of any party involved in
+
+the pending action? Id.
+
+Rule 412, entitled "Sex Offense Cases; Relevance of Alleged Victim's Past Sexual Behavior or Alleged Sexual Predisposition," provides in relevant part -
+
+(a) Evidence generally inadmissible.—The following evidence is not admissible in any civil ... proceeding involving alleged sexual misconduct except as provided in subdivisions (b) and (c):
+
+(1) Evidence offered to prove that any alleged victim engaged in other sexual behavior.
+
+(2) Evidence offered to prove any alleged victim's sexual predisposition.
+
+(b) Exceptions.—
+
+(2) In a civil case, evidence offered to prove the sexual behavior or sexual predisposition of any alleged victim is admissible if it is otherwise admissible under these rules and its probative value substantially outweighs the danger of harm to any victim and of unfair prejudice to any party. Evidence of an alleged victim's reputation is admissible only if it has been placed in controversy by the alleged victim.
+
+(c) Procedure to determine admissibility.—
+
+(1) A party intending to offer evidence under subdivision (b) must—
+
+(A) file a written motion at least 14 days before trial specifically describing the evidence and stating the purpose for which it is offered unless the court, for good cause requires a different time for filing or permits filing during trial; and
+
+(B) serve the motion on all parties and notify the alleged victim or, when appropriate, the alleged victim's guardian or representative.
+
+(2) Before admitting evidence under this rule the court must conduct a hearing in camera and afford the victim and parties a right to attend and be heard. The motion, related papers, and the record of the hearing must be sealed and remain under seal unless the court orders otherwise.
+
+In confirming that Rule 412 does not control the discoverability of such information, the Advisory Committee Notes (1994 Amendments) state -
+
+The procedures set forth in subdivision (c) do not apply to discovery of a
+
+> victim's past sexual conduct or predisposition in civil cases, which will be continued to be governed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26. In order not to undermine the rationale of Rule 412, however, courts should enter appropriate orders pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 (c) to protect the victim against unwarranted inquiries and to ensure confidentiality. Courts should presumptively issue protective orders barring discovery unless the party seeking discovery makes a showing that the evidence sought to be discovered would be relevant under the facts and theories of the particular case, and cannot be obtained except through discovery. In an action for sexual harassment, for instance, while some evidence of the alleged victim's sexual behavior and/or predisposition in the workplace ma be relevant, non-work place conduct will usually be irrelevant. Cf. v. McGregor Electronic Industries, Inc., 989 F.2d 959, 962- 63 (8th Cir. 1993) (posing for a nude magazine outside work hours is irrelevant to issue of unwelcomeness of sexual advances at work). Confidentiality orders should be presumptively granted as well.
+
+(Emphasis added).
+
+In accordance with Rule 412 and Rule 26, the discovery sought regarding any photos, movies, dvds, and videotapes as decscribed in requests nos. 10 and 11, and Plaintiffs sexual activity with males, as described in nos. 17 and 18, including whether she received any compensation or consideration therefore, are all relevant to Plaintiff's damages claims and the type of injury she claims she has suffered. Defendant has no other means of obtaining such information and obtaining such information through Plaintiff will better protect the confidentiality until the Court can make a determination in accordance with the procedures under Rule 412(c) whether such information will be admissible at trial. See Rule 412(c) quoted above. Defendant will agree to an order keeping the confidentiality of the information obtained through discovery.
+
+The evidence sought is relevant based on the facts and theories of this action. In her Second Amended Complaint, Plaintiff attempts to allege claims in Count I for "Sexual Assault and Battery," Count II for "Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress," and in Count III for "Coercion and Enticement to Sexual Activity in Violation of 18
+
+U.S.C.A. §2422," and seeks damages pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §2255(a). (Plaintiff alleges diversity of citizenship as a basis for this Court's jurisdiction. 2d Am. Complaint, ¶5). Counts I and II are brought pursuant to state law.
+
+In her complaint, Plaintiff alleges that "she has suffered and will continue to suffer severe and permanent traumatic injuries, including mental, psychological and emotional damages," and "severe mental anguish and pain." She also seeks compensatory damages for her alleged injuries. 2d Am. Complaint,¶¶21, 27, 33, and "Wherefore" clauses. In her answers to interrogatories nos. 9 and 10, Plaintiff further states that:
+
+Plaintiff has suffered severe psychological and emotional injuries, including without limitation, anxiety, depression, suicidal ideation, guilt, self-blame, feelings of being degraded, feeling unattractive, diminished sense of femininity, fluctuations in weight/appetite, sexual intimacy problems, flashbacks, disturbing memories, stress, irritability, feelings of being isolated and trapped, diminished trust, social problems, problems in personal relationships, indecisiveness, lower energy, lower ambition and initiative, headaches, back pain, feels stress (particularly around men), obsessive thoughts, problems concentrating, alcohol abuse, corruption of morals and values, loss of innocence, and cries a lot. (lnterrog. No. 9).
+
+... she seeks damages arising from her psychological and emotional injuries. These damages include pain and suffering, costs of psychological care and treatment, and loss of earning capacity. ... (lnterrog. No. 10).
+
+Plaintiff also alleges that ' , a Palm Beach Community College student," was a part of "Epstein's plan and scheme (which) reflected a particular pattern and method" in the alleged recruiting of girl's to come to EPSTEIN's Palm Beach mansion and give him "massages" in exchange for money. 2nd Am. Complaint, ¶10-12. According to the complaint allegations — "Upon information and belief Epstein has a sexual preference and obsession for underage minor girls." ¶8. The "girl would be led up a flight of stairs to a bedroom that contained a massage table ... The girl would be
+
+alone with EPSTEIN; "Epstein would then perform one or more lewd, lascivious and sexual acts, including masturbation and touching the girl sexually." 2nd Am. Complaint, ¶11, 12. Plaintiff alleges that "in 2004-2005," she, "then approximately 16 years old, fell into Epstein's trap and became one of his victims." ¶8. Plaintiff alleges that Epstein "sexually assaulted" her and "masturbated during the massage." ¶12 Plaintiff further alleges that "Epstein committed willful acts of child sexual abuse" on her, which resulted in "mental or sexual injury," and "caused or likely to cause Jane Doe's mental or emotional health to be significantly impaired." 2d Am. Complaint, ¶25.
+
+The items sought are clearly relevant to the injuries and damages claimed by Plaintiff. The nature of her claimed injuries and damages are such that Defendant is entitled to evidence which would show the nature of her relationship with males, whether she has suffered other acts of sexual misconduct, including exploitation and abuse, as alleged in her complaint, whether she suffered injury and damages as a result of the other claimed sexual misconduct with males, and whether she has willingly or not willingly engaged in sexual activity that has been photographed, or filmed by means of movie, dvd or videotapes. See United States v. Bear Stops, 997 F.2d 451 (8th Cir. 1993)(Defendant charged with sexual abuse of six year old boy was entitled to admission of evidence relating to victim's sexual assault by 3 older boys to establish alternative explanation for why victim exhibited behavioral manifestations of sexually abused child.).
+
+In further support of Defendant's motion, a copy of Balas v. Ruzzo, 703 So.2d 1076 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997), rev. denied, 719 So.2d 286 (Fla. 1998), is attached hereto as Exhibit A as it is on point to the discovery issues in this action, and the relevancy and
+
+discoverability of Plaintiffs history of sexual activity and any payment, therefore. See interrogatories 8, 22 and 30 propounded in the Balas case and footnote 1 herein. 1
+
+Additionally and significantly, in other pending state court civil actions against Defendant EPSTEIN attempting to assert similar claims and damages, the Circuit Court Judges have already ruled that such information is discoverable as it is relevant to the damages
+
+claims of Plaintiff. See Composite Exhibits B and C hereto. Composite Exhibit B are the Orders, dated February 23, 2009, entered in the case of A.C. v. Epstein, and
+
+Case No. 502008CA025129 MB Al, 15111Judicial Circuit, In and For Palm Beach County, State of Florida, which granted Defendant's motion to compel therein directed to discovery identical to interrogatory no. 18 above, and to requests for production nos. 17 and 18 addressed below herein. (In the A.C. case, the Plaintiff answered without objection interrogatories identical to nos. 19, 20, and 21 herein.) Composite Exhibit C is a portion the transcript from a March 3, 2009 hearing on Defendant's motion to compel discovery in the case of Jane Doe II v. Epstein, and I= Case No. 502008CA020614 MB AF, 151" Judicial Circuit Court, In and For Palm Beach County, State of Florida. Again, the Circuit Court Judge determined that the information sought is relevant to the issue of damages and, thus, discoverable.
+
+WHEREFORE, Defendant requests that this Court enter an order granting Defendant's motion to compel, overruling Plaintiffs objections, and compelling Plaintiff be to produce the items sought and/or to better respond to the requests as specified
+
+<sup>1</sup> In Balas v. Ruzzo supra, the Plaintiffs alleged a multicount complaint including claims for "coercion of prostitution" pursuant to §796.09, Fla. Stat.; for battery for the unwanted and offensive touching of petitioners' bodies; false imprisonment for physically confining the petitioners against their will; invasion of privacy; and intentional infliction of emotional distress.
+
+above. Defendant further requests that this Court award his attorney's fees and costs, associated with this motion, in accordance with Rule 37, Fed.R.Civ.P., and applicable Local Rules.
+
+## Rule 7.1 Certification
+
+I hereby certify that counsel for the respective parties communicated by letters in a good faith effort to resolve the discovery issues prior to the filing of this motion to compel. Some of the issues were resolved.
+
+> Robert D. Cr on, Jr. Attorney for ,Defendant Epstein
+
+## Certificate of Service
+
+I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of recoDdentified on the following Service List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on thisiftrday of April, 2009:
+
+Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A. 18205 Biscayne Boulevard Suite 2218 Miami, FL 33160 305-931-2200 Fax: 305-931-0877 ssm@sexabuseattornev.com ahorowitz@sexabuseattornev.com Counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe #2
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 561-659-8300 Fax: 561-835-8691 jaqesqa bellsouth.net Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
+
+Respectfully su itted, By: ROBERT D CRITTON, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar No. 224162 rcrit bciclaw.com MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 mpike bciclaw.com
+
+> BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN 515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561/842-2820 Phone 561/515-3148 Fax (Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein)
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739698/EFTA02739698.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739698/EFTA02739698.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f518efabd97175338df9dac4f5aa60864512925f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739698/EFTA02739698.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,763 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739698.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 13,
+  "chars": 23379,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.96,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            202.572,
+            72.08999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            413.5199890136719,
+            72.08999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            413.5199890136719,
+            101.41998291015625
+          ],
+          [
+            202.572,
+            101.41998291015625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFF, JANE DOE NO. \n3, TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S FIRST REQUEST TO PRODUCE & TO \nOVERRULE OBJECTIONS, & FOR AN AWARD OF DEFENDANTS \nREASONABLE EXPENSES",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            111.384,
+            277.83000000000004
+          ],
+          [
+            507.7142028808594,
+            277.83000000000004
+          ],
+          [
+            507.7142028808594,
+            331.66998291015625
+          ],
+          [
+            111.384,
+            331.66998291015625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Introduction",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            274.788,
+            537.0300000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            345.97320556640625,
+            537.0300000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            345.97320556640625,
+            551.8000030517578
+          ],
+          [
+            274.788,
+            551.8000030517578
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Motion To Compel Responses to Nos. 1.10. 11. 17. & 18",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            160.344,
+            207.9375
+          ],
+          [
+            458.49261474609375,
+            207.9375
+          ],
+          [
+            458.49261474609375,
+            222.54998779296875
+          ],
+          [
+            160.344,
+            222.54998779296875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Production Request No. 1",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            238.68,
+            233.06744384765625
+          ],
+          [
+            380.9543762207031,
+            233.06744384765625
+          ],
+          [
+            380.9543762207031,
+            248.04998779296875
+          ],
+          [
+            238.68,
+            248.04998779296875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Response:",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            70.38,
+            312.65999999999997
+          ],
+          [
+            138.31019592285156,
+            312.65999999999997
+          ],
+          [
+            138.31019592285156,
+            327.54998779296875
+          ],
+          [
+            70.38,
+            327.54998779296875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Legal Argument Supporting Entitlement to Discovery Sought in No. 1",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            125.46000000000001,
+            404.8074951171875
+          ],
+          [
+            495.3243713378906,
+            404.8074951171875
+          ],
+          [
+            495.3243713378906,
+            420.17999267578125
+          ],
+          [
+            125.46000000000001,
+            420.17999267578125
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Production Requests Nos. 10, 11. 17. & 18",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            193.392,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            421.36175537109375,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            421.36175537109375,
+            87.54998779296875
+          ],
+          [
+            193.392,
+            87.54998779296875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Response:",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            68.544,
+            300.51
+          ],
+          [
+            139.47116088867188,
+            300.51
+          ],
+          [
+            139.47116088867188,
+            317.78997802734375
+          ],
+          [
+            68.544,
+            317.78997802734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Legal Argument Supporting Entitlement to Discovery Sought in 10, 11, 17, & 18",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            98.53200000000001,
+            422.82
+          ],
+          [
+            520.0026245117188,
+            422.82
+          ],
+          [
+            520.0026245117188,
+            441.16998291015625
+          ],
+          [
+            98.53200000000001,
+            441.16998291015625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Rule 7.1 Certification",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 11,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            249.696,
+            153.89999999999998
+          ],
+          [
+            365.82135009765625,
+            153.89999999999998
+          ],
+          [
+            365.82135009765625,
+            168.91998291015625
+          ],
+          [
+            249.696,
+            168.91998291015625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Certificate of Service",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 11,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            263.772,
+            318.33
+          ],
+          [
+            389.6554260253906,
+            318.33
+          ],
+          [
+            389.6554260253906,
+            333.5500183105469
+          ],
+          [
+            263.772,
+            333.5500183105469
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            55
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            59
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            30
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            57
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            65
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            33
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            65
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            33
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            57
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            67
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            34
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            16
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            69
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            34
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            67
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            33
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 9,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            64
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 10,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            61
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            29
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 11,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            97
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            46
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 12,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            19
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739698"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739711/EFTA02739711.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739711/EFTA02739711.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a644b76a3d276f0140d9e8766fa89c586cd69bde
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739711/EFTA02739711.md
@@ -0,0 +1,314 @@
+Westlaw.
+
+703 So.2d 1076  
+703 So.2d 1076, 22 Fla. L. Weekly D2375, 23 Fla. L. Weekly D169  
+(Cite as: 703 So.2d 1076)
+
+Page 1
+
+District Court of Appeal of Florida,  
+Fifth District.  
+Kimberly BALAS and Teresa Shumate, Petitioners,  
+v.  
+Marjorie A. RUZZO, and Exec., Inc., etc., Re-  
+spondents.  
+No. 97-82.
+
+307Ak31 k. Relevancy and Materiality.  
+Most Cited Cases  
+Party may be permitted to discover evidence that  
+would be inadmissible at trial, if it would lead to  
+discovery of relevant evidence. West's F.S.A. RCP  
+Rule 1.280(b)(1).
+
+**[3] Pretrial Procedure 307A ✉36.1**
+
+As Modified on Grant of Clarification Jan. 2, 1998.  
+rev. denied, 719 So.2d 286 (Fla.  
+Plaintiffs brought action against alleged house of 1998).  
+prostitution for, inter alia, coercion of prostitution.  
+The Circuit Court, Brevard County, █ Pound,  
+J., granted in part defendants' motion to compel dis-  
+covery. Plaintiffs filed petition for writ of certior-  
+ari. The District Court of Appeal, W. Sharp, J., held  
+that evidence of plaintiffs' past prostitution and  
+their revenues relating to such activities was dis-  
+coverable.
+
+307A Pretrial Procedure  
+307AII Depositions and Discovery  
+307AII(A) Discovery in General  
+307Ak36 Particular Subjects of Disclos- ure  
+307Ak36.1 k. In General. Most Cited
+
+Petition denied.  
+Harris, J., concurred specially and filed opinion.
+
+West Headnotes
+
+**[1] Pretrial Procedure 307A ✉31**  
+307A Pretrial Procedure  
+307AII Depositions and Discovery  
+307AII(A) Discovery in General  
+307Ak31 k. Relevancy and Materiality.
+
+Cases  
+Evidence of plaintiffs' past prostitution and their  
+revenues relating to such activities, including activ-  
+ities with alleged house of prostitution against  
+which they had filed suit, was discoverable, where  
+plaintiffs brought action not only for coercion of  
+prostitution, but also for battery, false imprison-  
+ment, invasion of privacy, intentional infliction of  
+emotional distress, violation of their civil rights,  
+and racketeering. Violent Crime Control and Law  
+Enforcement Act of 1994, § 40302, 42 U.S.C.A. §  
+13981; West's F.S.A. §§ 772.014, 796.09; West's  
+F.S.A. RCP Rule 1.280(b)(1).  
+\*1076 Richard E. █ and Heather Fisher Lind-  
+say, of Spriggs & █ Tallahassee, for Peti-  
+tioners.
+
+Most Cited Cases  
+Discovery in civil cases must be relevant to subject  
+matter of case and must be admissible or reason-  
+ably calculated to lead to admissible evidence.  
+West's F.S.A. RCP Rule 1.280(b)(1).
+
+Mark S. Peters of Amari, Theriac & Eisenmenger,  
+P.A., Cocoa, for Respondents.  
+W. SHARP, Judge.
+
+**[2] Pretrial Procedure 307A ✉31**  
+307A Pretrial Procedure  
+307AII Depositions and Discovery  
+307AII(A) Discovery in General
+
+Balas and Shumate petition this court for a writ of  
+certiorari to review certain portions of the lower  
+court's order which granted, in part, a motion to  
+compel discovery filed by respondents Ruzzo and  
+Exec., Inc. Petitioners argue that those portions de-  
+part from the essential requirements of law and will  
+cause them irreparable harm because they will be
+
+EXHIBIT "A"
+
+703 So.2d 1076, 22 Fla. L. Weekly D2375, 23 Fla. L. Weekly D169(Cite as: 703 So.2d 1076)compelled to disclose intimate details of their sexual history. We decline to issue the writ of certiorari.
+
+Balas and Shumate filed suit against Ruzzo and Exec, Inc., doing business as "The Boardroom." According to Balas and Shumate, The Boardroom operates ostensibly as **\*1077** a leisure spa but actually is a house of prostitution. Balas worked at The Boardroom from December 1993 until February 1996; Shumate worked there from October 1992 until March 1996. Ruzzo, the sole officer and shareholder of Exec, Inc., collected about fifty to sixty percent of each employees' earnings from performing sexual acts.
+
+According to Balas and Shumate, Ruzzo exerted mental and emotional control over her employees and thus she was able to exploit them as prostitutes. Ruzzo required her employees to pay her substantial sums of money to attend "metaphysical workshops" conducted by Ruzzo or persons associated with her. At the work place, the employees were required to participate in religious and quasi-religious "circles," rituals and incantations. These practices were allegedly designed to break down the personalities of the women who worked for Ruzzo and to ██████████ dependency and loyalty to herself. At one time when the earnings of a new employee were missing and believed to be stolen, Ruzzo required that the petitioners be strip searched and body cavity searched. Ruzzo caused the petitioners to believe their continued employment was dependent on their submission to these searches and that they might be arrested on felony charges if they refused to submit to the searches.
+
+Balas and Shumate's second amended complaint against Ruzzo contains seven counts. Count I is an action for coercion of prostitution pursuant to section 796.09, Florida Statutes. Petitioners allege the requirement that they perform sexual acts to retain their employment constitutes inducement and coercion to engage in prostitution. Count II is a claim for battery for the unwanted and offensive touching of the petitioners' bodies. Count III is a claim for false imprisonment for physically confining the pe-
+
+titioners against their will. Count IV alleges that respondents' actions constituted an invasion of petitioners' privacy. Count V is a claim for the intentional infliction of emotional distress. Count VI alleges a civil rights action-that respondents have violated petitioners' right to be free from crimes of violence motivated by gender within the meaning of 42 U.S.C. section 13981. Finally, count VII seeks civil remedies for criminal practices or racketeering pursuant to section 772.104, Florida Statutes. The petitioners claim that they suffered emotional pain, anguish, humiliation, insult, indignity, loss of self-esteem, inconvenience, hurt and emotional distress. They seek an award of general and punitive damages, among other relief.
+
+The discovery to which the petitioners are being required to respond is as follows:
+
+**I.**
+
+**Interrogatory 8:** Please advise how long have you been engaged in prostitution....
+
+**II.**
+
+**Interrogatory 22:** State with specificity the manner in which the acts as described in your Complaint have materially affected how you interact with your husband, boyfriend, fiancée' [sic] or any other individual of the opposite sex.
+
+**III.**
+
+**Request for Production 30:** A copy of any photographs, movies or videotapes in which you performed sexual acts and/or simulated sexual acts in exchange for money or other consideration.
+
+**IV.**
+
+**Interrogatory 16:** Please list the names, addresses, telephone numbers and rates of pay for all employers for which you worked, including the
+
+703 So.2d 1076  
+703 So.2d 1076, 22 Fla. L. Weekly D2375, 23 Fla. L. Weekly D169  
+(Cite as: 703 So.2d 1076)
+
+Page 3
+
+nature of the work, during the five years immediately preceding the date of employment with the Boardroom and from the date of your termination with the Boardroom to the present, providing the names of your immediate supervisors at each place of employment and the reason for your leaving each place of employment.
+
+V.
+
+**Interrogatory 26:** Please state your total income while employed at the Boardroom, and state the source of that income including any income from other employment or \*1078 income earned from prostitution other than at the Boardroom.
+
+VI.
+
+**Request for Production 34:** Business records from any selfemployment or owned business ventures in the last 5 years, including any records or list of customers, "special customer lists" or "sugar daddy's list."
+
+[1][2] Discovery in civil cases must be relevant to the subject matter of the case and must be admissible or reasonably calculated to lead to admissible evidence. *See Allstate Insurance Co. v. Langston*, 655 So.2d 91 (Fla.1995); *Amente v. [REDACTED]*, 653 So.2d 1030 (Fla.1995); [REDACTED] v. *Stardust Cruisers, Inc.*, 690 So.2d 743 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997). The concept of relevancy is broader in the discovery context than in the trial context and a party may be permitted to discover evidence that would be inadmissible at trial, if it would lead to the discovery of relevant evidence. *Allstate; Amente*. Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280(b)(1) delineates the proper scope of discovery:
+
+*In General.* Parties may obtain discovery regarding any matter, not privileged, that is relevant to the subject matter of the pending action, whether it relates to the claim or defense of the party seeking discovery or the claim or defense of any other party, including the existence, description,
+
+nature, custody, condition, and location of any books, documents, or other tangible things and the identity and location of persons having knowledge of any discoverable matter. It is not ground for objection that the information sought will be inadmissible at the trial if the information sought appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.
+
+Nonetheless, the discovery of certain kinds of information may cause material injury of an irreparable nature. This includes the "cat-out-of-the-bag" material that could be used to injure another person or party outside the context of the litigation, material protected by privilege, trade secrets or work product. Discovery was never intended to be used as a tactical tool to harass, embarrass or annoy one's adversary. Rather, pretrial discovery was implemented to simplify the issues in a case, to eliminate the elements of surprise, to encourage the settlement of cases, to avoid the cost of litigation, and to achieve a balanced search for the truth to ensure a fair trial. *Elkins v. Syken*, 672 So.2d 517 (Fla.1996).
+
+Here the petitioners argue that the information sought to be discovered regarding prostitution and their sexual activities was propounded solely to embarrass them and to invade their right to privacy. The petitioners also claim that this information is privileged under section 796.09 and is not calculated to lead to evidence which would be admissible at trial.
+
+Section 796.09 provides a person with a civil cause of action for compensatory and punitive damages against anyone who coerces that person into prostitution, who coerces that person to remain in prostitution, or who uses coercion to collect or receive any part of that person's earnings derived from prostitution. In the course of litigation under this section, any transaction about which a plaintiff testifies or produces evidence does *not* subject the plaintiff to criminal prosecution or to any penalty or forfeiture. In addition, any testimony or evidence or any information produced by the plaintiff or wit-
+
+703 So.2d 1076  
+703 So.2d 1076, 22 Fla. L. Weekly D2375, 23 Fla. L. Weekly D169  
+(Cite as: 703 So.2d 1076)
+
+Page 4
+
+ness for the plaintiffs cannot be used against the plaintiffs or witness in any other investigation or proceeding, except one for perjury.
+
+Section 796.09(5) specifically provides that it is *not* a defense that the plaintiff was paid or otherwise compensated for prostitution, that the plaintiff had engaged in prostitution prior to any involvement with the defendant or that the plaintiff made no attempt to escape from the defendant. Section 796.09(6) provides that convictions for prostitution or prostitution-related offenses are *inadmissible* for the purpose of attacking the plaintiffs' credibility.
+
+This legislation was the result of the Florida Supreme Court Gender Bias Study Commission, which conducted an extensive investigation of prostitution in this state. The Commission's activities included interviews with law enforcement and corrections personnel, \*1079 judges, public defenders, prosecutors, drug rehabilitation counselors, social workers, medical personnel, prostitutes, clients and pimps. The Commission found prostitution to be prevalent and uniform throughout the state and law enforcement largely unable to deter it under prevailing social attitudes and judicial practices. The Commission further found that prostitutes are often victims of economic, physical, and psychological coercion, that most persons do not chose to become prostitutes, but do so to survive, and that ninety percent of street prostitutes, both adult and children, are controlled by pimps who use a variety of coercive methods to maintain this control. The Commission determined that clients and pimps are rarely prosecuted and, when prosecuted, receive light sentences; whereas prostitutes, who are mainly females, are frequently prosecuted and receive harsher treatment in the courts. The Commission recommended changes in the methods of intervention in prostitution from punitive to therapeutic, changes in the law to require more equal treatment by the courts of the prostitute in relation to the client and the pimp and to lessen the incentive to traffic in human flesh by giving the prostitute access to the judicial system without first having to be
+
+arrested.
+
+Under section 796.09, the petitioners' prior involvement in prostitution and their earnings from prostitution would be irrelevant. Hence discovery should not be permitted because such information would not be admissible at trial nor would it be reasonably calculated to lead to evidence ultimately admissible at trial. Even though the scope of discovery is generally quite broad, section 796.09 is designed to encourage prostitutes to sue their pimps. Thus the usually broad scope of discovery may be constricted so that prostitutes will not be embarrassed, harassed or hindered in their actions.
+
+[3] Had the petitioners brought their lawsuit against Ruzzo and The Boardroom *only* under section 796.09, evidence of petitioners' past prostitution, including with the Boardroom, and their earnings relating to such activities, may not have been discoverable. However, the petitioners filed a multi-count complaint for compensatory and punitive damages, alleging numerous causes of action against the respondents. These other causes carry no such protection from discovery. Since the information sought by discovery may be relevant or may lead to the discovery of admissible evidence in one or more of these *other* causes of action or to determination of damages, we cannot conclude that the trial court departed from the essential requirements of law in granting this discovery. *See* [REDACTED] v. *TIB Bank of the Keys*, 687 So.2d 895 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) (by alleging fraud as well as breach of contract, purchaser placed at issue her reliance on venders' assertions, the veracity of financial documents she submitted to the vender, and the state of her mental health, including memory problems she was experiencing at the time of the alleged tortious conduct, thus deposition questions concerning her state of mind were relevant).
+
+Petition for Writ of Certiorari DENIED.
+
+THOMPSON, J., concurs.  
+HARRIS, J., concurs specially with opinion.HARRIS, Judge, concurring specially:
+
+703 So.2d 1076, 22 Fla. L. Weekly D2375, 23 Fla. L. Weekly D169(Cite as: 703 So.2d 1076)There is a temptation in cases such as this to inquire which, the pot or the kettle, is imbued with the darker hue. Indeed that may ultimately be the question uppermost in the jurors' minds. But the issue presently before us is simply whether the pot, in order to establish the parties' comparative complexion, may discover the historical condition and the inherent characteristics of the kettle.
+
+We are here involved with parties that the limited record before us indicates were co-conspirators in a joint effort to violate Florida's laws against prostitution. The defendants are the owner/operators of a "social club" whose primary service is prostitution; the plaintiffs are employees of the club who provide such services. The employees are suing the owner/operators for, among other counts, taking advantage of their vulnerabilities ("coercing" them to be prostitutes) through manipulation and exploitation. In order to prepare a defense to the action, defendants have filed certain interrogatories for the employees to answer. These interrogatories\*1080 request such information as how long the employees have been engaged in prostitution; how the employees have been affected by the defendants' conduct; copies of photographs, movies, and videotapes in which the employees have performed sexual acts or simulated sexual acts; the names of previous employers and previous rates of pay; and a statement of income received from defendants. These interrogatories survived the employees' objections. I agree certiorari should be denied.
+
+The employees' primary cause of action is based on section 796.09(1), Florida Statutes, which provides:
+
+(1) A person has a cause of action for compensatory and punitive damages against:
+
+(a) A person who coerces that person into prostitution;
+
+(b) A person who coerces that person to remain in prostitution, or
+
+(c) A person who uses coercion to collect or receive
+
+any part of that person's earnings derived from prostitution.
+
+The employees resist discovery of their past prostitution or their past or present earning experience on the basis of subparagraph 5 of section 796.09:
+
+(5) It does not constitute a defense to a complaint under this section that:
+
+a) The plaintiff was paid or otherwise compensated for acts of prostitution;
+
+b) The plaintiff engaged in acts of prostitution prior to any involvement with the defendant ...
+
+But the question before us is not whether prior acts of prostitution (or the receipts of earnings therefrom) which might be revealed by answering the interrogatories could be used as a defense to the complaint, but rather whether evidence of such conduct or such earnings would be relevant in determining whether the employees were, in fact, "coerced" into prostitution, into remaining prostitutes, or into sharing the proceeds of their services with defendants. The relevancy of this information depends, of course, on what constitutes coercion.
+
+If we apply the definition of "coercion" which is commonly accepted, then the relevancy of the requested information is apparent and this appeal has no merit at all. Webster defines "coercion" as: (1) to restrain or dominate by force, (2) to compel an act or choice, or (3) to enforce or bring about by force or threat. In sexual battery cases, the legislature has adopted the common meaning of the word "coercion" and has even placed limits on it. It has provided that consent will not be recognized if submission is *coerced* by threats of force or violence *if* the victim reasonably believes the perpetrator has the present ability to execute the threat.<sup>791</sup> Consent also will not be recognized if submission is *coerced* by a threat of retaliation against the victim or another *if* the victim reasonably believes that the perpetrator has the ability to execute the threat in the future.<sup>792</sup> And in sexual battery cases, the legislature has vitiated what might otherwise be con-
+
+© 2009 Thomson Reuters/West. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.
+
+703 So.2d 1076, 22 Fla. L. Weekly D2375.23 Fla. L. Weekly D169
+
+(Cite as: 703 Sold 1076)
+
+sidered as consensual if one exploits a known physical or mental weakness of the victim to achieve his or her goal or takes advantage of one who is physically helpless or involuntarily intoxicated."
+
+Therefore, even in sexual battery cases, before coercion or exploitation will vitiate consent, the free will of the victim must be overcome by force or threat or some unfortunate circumstance suffered by the victim.
+
+> FNI. Section 794.011(4)(b), Florida Statutes.
+
+> FN2. Section 794.01I(4)(c), Florida Statutes.
+
+FN3. Section 794.0I1(4)(a),(d),(e). and (I), Florida Statutes.
+
+But then we get to the definition of "coercion" contained in section 796.09(3):
+
+:3) As used in this section, the term "coercion" means any practice of dominion, restraint, or inducement for the purpose of or with the reasonably foreseeable effect of causing another person to engage in or remain in prostitution or to relinquish earnings derived from prostitution, and includes, but is not limited to:
+
+:a) Physical force or threats of physical force
+
+:b) Physical or mental torture.
+
+:c) Kidnapping.
+
+\*1081 (d) Blackmail.
+
+;e) Extortion or claims of indebtedness.
+
+f) Threats of legal complaint or report of delinquency.
+
+,'g) Threat to interfere with parental rights or responsibilities, whether by judicial or administrative action or otherwise.
+
+:h) Promise of legal benefit.
+
+',I) Promise of greater financial rewards.
+
+'j) Promise of marriage.
+
+:k) Restraint of Speech or communications with others.
+
+) Exploitation of a condition of developmental disability, cognitive limitation, affective disorder, or substance dependency.
+
+:m) Exploitation of victimization by sexual abuse.
+
+:n) Exploitation of pornographic performance.
+
+:o) Exploitation of human needs for food, shelter, safety, or affection.
+
+The definition urged by the employees herein is the "promise of a greater financial reward." Whether the requested information is relevant to the issue of coercion in this case will depend on what the legislature intended by subsection (I) in the meaning of "coercion."
+
+I agree with Judge Altenbemd's thoughtful analysis in State v. Brigham, 694 So.2d 793 (1997):
+
+there can be no dispute that the legislature's unusual definition of "percent" is not a common dictionary definition. This is perhaps an appropriate case in which to remind ourselves of Learned Hand's famous observation that a "mature and developed jurisprudence" does not "make a fortress out of the dictionary."
+
+But even so. one would expect some nexus between the commonly accepted meaning of a word and the definition of that word ascribed by the legislature. If, for example, the legislature defined "canine" as including cats, although one might, jurisprudentially speaking, expect to hear a meow emanate from a Great Dane, the courts should nevertheless closely examine the legislative history to see if that is really what the legislature intended. The court in Young v. O'Keefe, 246 Iowa 1182, 69 N.W.2d 534, 537 (1955), stated this principle as follows: "But
+
+703 So.2d 1076  
+703 So.2d 1076, 22 Fla. L. Weekly D2375, 23 Fla. L. Weekly D169  
+(Cite as: 703 So.2d 1076)
+
+Page 7
+
+before a definition is construed so as to expand the meaning of a well-known word to include its antonym ..., the intention of the legislature to that effect must be clear." As Judge [REDACTED] observed in *Catron v. Roger Bohn, D.C., P.A.*, 580 So.2d 814, 818 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991):
+
+It is our primary duty to give effect to legislative intent and, if a literal interpretation of a statute leads to unreasonable results, then we should exercise our power to interpret reason and logic to it.
+
+\* \* \* \* \*
+
+Unfortunately, it is apparent that in enacting this legislation, the legislature has, without redefining the terms for the purposes of this legislation, often used terms with commonly accepted meanings for purposes at great variance from those commonly accepted meanings.
+
+In our case, the legislature did define the term for the purpose of the act. But because the term (coercion) as so defined can be interpreted two ways-one consistent with the commonly accepted meaning and one at variance-we should not accept the "antonym" unless such legislative intent is clear. A free will decision, even if based on a hope of financial gain, is the opposite of a coerced decision.
+
+The employees urge that the mere promise of a greater reward brings them within the act. But if the mere promise of a greater reward is sufficient to establish coercion, then anyone who makes a voluntary and reasoned exercise of free will motivated by the hope of economic gain has been coerced. This definition removes the element of compulsion implicit in the commonly accepted meaning of coercion and substitutes therefor the mere desire for financial gain. The employees herein assert that since they were offered "a greater financial reward" for providing the services performed by them through defendants' establishment, they were coerced into their prostitution activities. This equates the giving
+
+of an opportunity to make a decision with the coercion of that decision. But subsection (I) can also mean \*1082 that the promise of a greater reward is coercion *only if* such promised reward is sufficient to overcome one's natural revulsion to selling one's body for money. If there is no such revulsion, there can be no coercion. Becoming a prostitute only because one likes the hours and wages or "because it beats the heck out of working for a living" simply should not meet the test of section 796.09(1).
+
+At oral argument herein, it was suggested without contradiction, that at least one of the employees has a college degree and gave up a well-paying, legitimate job in order to engage in this profession for the greater reward. Section 796.09 does not appear to be a general prostitute's relief act. It is based on a report by the Gender Bias Study Commission which recommended the equalization of treatment in relation to the prostitute, the client and the "pimp." It is based on the premise that prostitutes are generally victims of economic, physical, and psychological coercion and choose prostitution in order to survive. Further, the Commission was concerned that 90 percent of the street prostitutes are controlled by "pimps" who use a variety of coercive methods to maintain control. It seems clear that the legislature was not intending to depart from the precepts of the commonly understood meaning of "coercion" and to redefine it to include both free will decisions and compelled decisions.. The interpretation urged by the employees seems at variance with the stated goal of the legislature and the Gender Bias Commission.
+
+Since there is no cause of action provided for one who makes a reasoned and voluntary exercise of their free will to enter or continue in the profession solely for financial rewards (assuming "coercion" is given the definition more consistent with its commonly accepted meaning and assuming that my interpretation of legislative intent is correct), coercion becomes the critical issue in the trial of such action. The interrogatories propounded by defendants appear relevant to the issue of coercion.
+
+703 So.2d 1076, 22 Fla. L. Weekly D2375, 23 Fla. L. Weekly D169(Cite as: 703 So.2d 1076)This is a case of first impression based on a relatively new statute. As indicated, the legislative history of the new law suggests that the statute is designed to assist those who were forced to enter prostitution in order to keep a roof over their heads or food on their table. It does not appear to be intended to aid those who voluntarily enter the profession in order to drive a Mercedes instead of a █████. The limited record before us indicates that even beginning employees of the defendants (those who do not have an established clientele) bring in \$700 a day and can keep 50% of their earnings. Based on a five-day work week, this would reflect an income of \$87,500 a year even with a two week vacation. And the employees herein are not beginners.
+
+There is no indication that the legislature intended to legalize prostitution or to make it a respectable profession. It merely intended to place the prostitute on the same footing with the client and the "pimp." If a prostitute voluntarily makes the decision to participate, free from force, intimidation, or disadvantageous circumstance, then he or she is on the same footing as the other participants and should be treated the same.
+
+Although it might well serve a legitimate public purpose to permit the cannibalistic demise of such enterprises (and I am not unsympathetic with this view), that does not appear to be the policy behind the current statute. Therefore, in cases where coercion is not present (and this may or may not be one), the court should continue its tradition of not interceding in civil conflicts involving transactions that are either illegal or are against public policy. *See Wechsler v. Novak*, 157 Fla. 703, 26 So.2d 884 (1946); █████ v. *Ratiner*, 462 So.2d 1157, 1160 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984), *rev. denied*, 472 So.2d 1182 (Fla.1985) ("An action may lie for interference with an unenforceable contract and even perhaps a voidable contract. No such cause of action lies for interference with a contract *void* as against public policy [another's representation of a client obtained by a doctor/lawyer's illegal personal injury solicitation
+
+in the hospital] and which makes one who is a party thereto, as the appellant in the instant case, guilty of a criminal act for entering into such an agreement.")
+
+We are not asked in this proceeding to rule on the admissibility of the discovered information as evidence at the trial of this cause. We are to determine only if the information might lead to admissible evidence. Even \*1083 though we deny the Writ I suggest we certify the following question:
+
+DOES ONE, FREE FROM FORCE, INTIMIDATION, OR DISADVANTAGEOUS CIRCUMSTANCE, WHO MAKES A REASONED DECISION TO BECOME OR REMAIN A PROSTITUTE OR TO SHARE THE PROCEEDS THEREOF BECAUSE OF A PROMISE OF A GREATER FINANCIAL REWARD HAVE A CAUSE OF ACTION UNDER SECTION 796.09(1), FLORIDA STATUTES?
+
+*ON MOTIONS FOR REHEARING, FOR CLARIFICATION, FOR CERTIFICATION, AND FOR REHEARING EN BANC*
+
+W. SHARP, Judge.
+
+Petitioners Balas and Shumate have filed motions for rehearing, clarification and certification. We deny the motions in full except for one regard. We delete the sentence in the last full paragraph of the opinion which reads: "These other causes of action carry no such protection from discovery."
+
+Motion for Clarification GRANTED as stated above; Motion for Rehearing and Certification DENIED.
+
+HARRIS and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.
+
+Fla.App. 5 Dist., 1997.
+
+Balas v. Ruzzo
+
+703 So.2d 1076, 22 Fla. L. Weekly D2375, 23 Fla. L. Weekly D169
+
+END OF DOCUMENT
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739711/EFTA02739711.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739711/EFTA02739711.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..926c2b5e0ba30c68ca578abcf6a4dc45cdeb4dc0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739711/EFTA02739711.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,472 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739711.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 8,
+  "chars": 30050,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 18.75,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "[3] Pretrial Procedure 307A \u270936.1",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            321.3,
+            204.93
+          ],
+          [
+            485.31600000000003,
+            204.93
+          ],
+          [
+            485.31600000000003,
+            217.07999999999998
+          ],
+          [
+            321.3,
+            217.07999999999998
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "West Headnotes",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            146.88,
+            409.04999999999995
+          ],
+          [
+            217.26,
+            409.04999999999995
+          ],
+          [
+            217.26,
+            419.58000000000004
+          ],
+          [
+            146.88,
+            419.58000000000004
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "I.",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            426.56399999999996,
+            324.81000000000006
+          ],
+          [
+            438.804,
+            324.81000000000006
+          ],
+          [
+            438.804,
+            336.15
+          ],
+          [
+            426.56399999999996,
+            336.15
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "II.",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            424.72799999999995,
+            392.04
+          ],
+          [
+            440.64,
+            392.04
+          ],
+          [
+            440.64,
+            403.38
+          ],
+          [
+            424.72799999999995,
+            403.38
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "III.",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            423.5039999999999,
+            491.66999999999996
+          ],
+          [
+            443.70000000000005,
+            491.66999999999996
+          ],
+          [
+            443.70000000000005,
+            503.01
+          ],
+          [
+            423.5039999999999,
+            503.01
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "IV.",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            423.5039999999999,
+            582.39
+          ],
+          [
+            443.70000000000005,
+            582.39
+          ],
+          [
+            443.70000000000005,
+            592.92
+          ],
+          [
+            423.5039999999999,
+            592.92
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "V.",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            174.42,
+            202.5
+          ],
+          [
+            187.272,
+            202.5
+          ],
+          [
+            187.272,
+            213.03000000000003
+          ],
+          [
+            174.42,
+            213.03000000000003
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "VI.",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            171.972,
+            302.94
+          ],
+          [
+            189.108,
+            302.94
+          ],
+          [
+            189.108,
+            313.47
+          ],
+          [
+            171.972,
+            313.47
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "ON MOTIONS FOR REHEARING, FOR CLARIFICATION, FOR CERTIFICATION, AND FOR REHEARING EN BANC",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            323.74800000000005,
+            348.29999999999995
+          ],
+          [
+            539.784,
+            348.29999999999995
+          ],
+          [
+            539.784,
+            381.51
+          ],
+          [
+            323.74800000000005,
+            381.51
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            42
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            3
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            23
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            3
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            19
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            3
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            29
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            141
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            80
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            29
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            21
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            3
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            31
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739711"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739719/EFTA02739719.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739719/EFTA02739719.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b7c96ff37f2ece81b85c3c53e07e6989cbc0b439
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739719/EFTA02739719.md
@@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
+IN THE COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH  
+JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM  
+BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
+
+A.C.,
+
+CASE NO. 502008CA025129XXXXMB AI
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+v.
+
+JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, and [REDACTED]  
+[REDACTED]
+
+Defendants.
+
+ORDER ON DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO  
+FIRST REQUEST TO PRODUCE TO PLAINTIFF AND TO OVERRULE  
+PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS, & FOR DEFENDANT'S EXPENSES,  
+INCLUDING ATTORNEYS' FEES
+
+THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Defendant Epstein's Motion To  
+Compel Responses To First Request To Produce To Plaintiff And To Overrule  
+Plaintiff's Objections, & For Defendant's Expenses, Including Attorneys' Fees  
+and the Court having heard argument of counsel and being fully advised in these  
+premises, it is hereby
+
+ORDERED and ADJUDGED that Defendant's Motion is hereby granted/  
+denied as to # 17 + # 18, and denied  
+as to # 22 as phrased. Response to  
+be ~~for~~ served w/in 10 days.
+
+DONE AND ORDERED at Palm Beach County Courthouse, West Palm  
+Beach, Florida, this 23 day of Feb, 2008.
+
+![]()Copies furnished:  
+ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ., and MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ., 515 North Flagler Drive, Suite 400, West Palm Beach,  
+FL 33401; JACK SCAROLA, ESQ., AND JACK P. [REDACTED], ESQ., Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart &  
+Shipley, P.A., 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West Palm Beach, FL 33409, and JACK A.  
+GOLDBERGER, ESQ., Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A., One Clearlake Centre, Suite 1400, 250  
+Australian Avenue South, West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+
+EXHIBIT "B"
+
+CC JEN & DT  
+2/22/09 +  
+= 3/0
+
+IN THE COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH  
+JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM  
+BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
+
+A.C.,
+
+CASE NO. 502008CA025129XXXXMB AI
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+v.
+
+JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, and [REDACTED]  
+[REDACTED],
+
+Defendants.
+
+ORDER ON DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO COMPEL ANSWERS TO  
+INTERROGATORIES AND TO OVERRULE PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS, & FOR  
+DEFENDANT'S EXPENSES, INCLUDING ATTORNEYS' FEES
+
+THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Defendant Epstein's Motion To  
+Compel Answers To Interrogatories And To Overrule Plaintiff's Objections, & For  
+Defendant's Expenses, Including Attorneys' Fees, and the Court having heard  
+argument of counsel and being fully advised in these premises, it is hereby
+
+ORDERED and ADJUDGED that Defendant's Motion is hereby granted/  
+~~denied~~ as to #5, 12 #18, denied as  
+to #2. Responses to be served w/in  
+10 days.
+
+DONE AND ORDERED at Palm Beach County Courthouse, West Palm  
+Beach, Florida, this 23 day of Feb, 2009
+
+![]()Copies furnished:
+
+ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ., and MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ., 515 North Flagler Drive, Suite 400, West Palm Beach,  
+FL 33401; JACK SCAROLA, ESQ., AND JACK P. [REDACTED], ESQ., Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart &  
+Shipley, P.A., 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West Palm Beach, FL 33409, and JACK A.  
+GOLDBERGER, ESQ., Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A., One Clearlake Centre, Suite 1400, 250  
+Australian Avenue South, West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+
+CC: JEN6, DE  
+CC: Joe Benzer  
+mailed to [REDACTED]  
+3/05
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739719/EFTA02739719.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739719/EFTA02739719.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..38e1c13a238edd2d68a613157495be47e1fb8e34
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739719/EFTA02739719.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,166 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739719.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 2,
+  "chars": 2994,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 6.94,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "ORDER ON DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO FIRST REQUEST TO PRODUCE TO PLAINTIFF AND TO OVERRULE PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS, & FOR DEFENDANT'S EXPENSES, INCLUDING ATTORNEYS' FEES",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            96.696,
+            281.07
+          ],
+          [
+            500.0039999999999,
+            281.07
+          ],
+          [
+            500.0039999999999,
+            332.09999999999997
+          ],
+          [
+            96.696,
+            332.09999999999997
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "ORDER ON DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO COMPEL ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES AND TO OVERRULE PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS, & FOR DEFENDANT'S EXPENSES, INCLUDING ATTORNEYS' FEES",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            94.248,
+            281.88
+          ],
+          [
+            502.45199999999994,
+            281.88
+          ],
+          [
+            502.45199999999994,
+            320.76
+          ],
+          [
+            94.248,
+            320.76
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Copies furnished:",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            78.94800000000001,
+            628.5600000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            178.09199999999998,
+            628.5600000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            178.09199999999998,
+            642.33
+          ],
+          [
+            78.94800000000001,
+            642.33
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            29
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            74
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            34
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "Caption",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739719"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739721/EFTA02739721.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739721/EFTA02739721.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d293e3721d71140e327eb2a24b10261f23a91af7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739721/EFTA02739721.md
@@ -0,0 +1,283 @@
+## IN THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 50 2008CA020614XXXXMB AF
+
+JANE DOE II,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN and
+
+Defendants.
+
+COPY
+
+COURT REPORTER'S TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS HAD BEFORE THE HONORABLE DIANA
+
+DATE: March 3, 2009
+
+PLACE: Palm Beach County Courthouse 205 N. Dixie Highway West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
+
+> U.S. Legal Support (561) 835-0220
+
+../1 II EXHIBIT C.
+
+## APPEARANCES:
+
+LAW FIRM, P.A. 224 Datura Avenue Suite 900 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Counsel for Plaintiff BY: ISIDRO M. , ESQUIRE
+
+BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN 515 N. Flagler Drive Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Counsel for Defendant BY: ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQUIRE
+
+that but I'd just like to do that.
+
+THE COURT: Right. And if you want to contact the other individuals saying, you know, I'm the one that's questioning whether or not these need to be before one judge. You may have a different perspective than your colleagues who are prosecuting some of the cases.
+
+I understand the damages. I'm not saying consolidate. I'm saying transfer. It's not a consolidation issue. Everybody gets that confused for some reason. The words are very different out of my mouth, your mouth and how they're written.
+
+So let me go ahead and take a gander at this. I did read it last night. I'm not sure that we need to get -- we need names?
+
+MR. CRITTON: Right. Well, here's what some of the issues are is that, as an example -- if I could approach the bench.
+
+THE COURT: Sure.
+
+MR. CRITTON: This is some of the information that we've obtained through discovery from some of the -- from at least in this instance, it would be this particular Jane Doe.
+
+THE COURT: You know who Jane Doe is I take
+
+it?
+
+MR. CRITTON: Right.
+
+THE COURT: You know who the Jane Doe is?
+
+MR. CRITTON: Yes, correct. And so this particular lady has kept in part a diary and she -- which appears to have started some time this is not in any way significant -- but some time after she learned that she could file a lawsuit. I think she's also been to Oakwood Center some time after she learned she could file a lawsuit and seek damages from Mr. Epstein.
+
+There's no history of this lady beforehand other than in some of the Oakwood records where she was Baker Acted, she started drinking beer at 16, she started Xanax at 16, started marijuana at 15, that she's sexually active.
+
+So how she has interacted -- she has a claim for emotional damages, mental pain and anguish, psychiatric-type damages. How she's interacted with friends, with family, the events in her life, school, work, her interpersonal relationships both with men and let's -- we'll use an example men here, but other individuals. She's saying that this event with Mr. Epstein,
+
+this sexual assault and whatever occurred during these events is that -- has caused her damage.
+
+And therefore damages in the case such as the emotional, mental, psychiatric-type damages are completely subjective, I mean separate and apart from any medical bills that may be -- which are clearly intangible. So these are intangible damages. And the jury is instructed, you know, you advise the greater weight of the evidence, what's fair and reasonable under the circumstances.
+
+So what we would have is basically this young lady's testimony as to what she claims her damages are and what the circumstances are with her situation with Mr. Epstein. She claims on page 13, you know, I love this guy, I'm dating this guy Chris. On page 15 --
+
+THE COURT: Is this part of a diary for treatment?
+
+MR. CRITTON: I have no idea what it is. It was just produced in response to discovery. And she apparently started in, I think this is December of '08. You know I took Jay Lyntenis' girl to the zoo, had an amazing day, I love her, i.e., the girl. We have so much fun. I want a
+
+baby especially with him. Okay. So I know who this person is. We are all so open together, I love him and Jay and , what do I do with Chris, who is another guy in her life.
+
+All right. This is circumstances where this young lady is saying, look, Jeffrey Epstein has ruined my life from a damage standpoint, okay. Let me depose other individuals with whom you've had a relationship. And what if it turns out -- as with some of these girls did -- is they had relationships or had escapades or circumstances with individuals, older men similar to Mr. Epstein well before Mr. Epstein.
+
+And this girl, I don't know one way or the other, but let's assume she had a situation where she was assaulted or molested or raped, ' that all is going to affect her emotional and her mental pain and anguish and it will all factor into evaluating damages.
+
+You know, it's not something that I'm going to spread around. I'm happy to keep it, you know, within the confines of the discovery of this case. But if she says every other relationship in my life has been perfect but Jeff Epstein has done this to me and it has affected
+
+my ability to trust men and my sexual relationships with other men, which is part of her interpersonal relationships, okay, let's talk to
+
+THE COURT: When does your client allege that she had her first encounter with Mr. Epstein?
+
+MR. : At what age?
+
+THE COURT: Well, what year?
+
+MR. CRITTON: June of '03.
+
+MR. : June of '03, Judge.
+
+MR. CRITTON: She claims from June of '03 through November of '04.
+
+MR. : She was I believe 16 at the beginning and ended at 17. She was a minor during all this time.
+
+THE COURT: June of '03 to now is six years.
+
+Let me hear from Mr.
+
+MR. : Judge, in the criminal case that was filed against Mr. Epstein, he would not have had a right to do this type of discovery and I -- if I could hand up --
+
+THE COURT: They wouldn't care about the women.
+
+MR. : Right. Well, I mean --
+
+1
+
+2
+
+3
+
+4
+
+5
+
+6
+
+7
+
+8
+
+9
+
+10
+
+11
+
+12
+
+13
+
+14
+
+15
+
+16
+
+17
+
+18
+
+19
+
+20
+
+21
+
+22
+
+23
+
+24
+
+25
+
+THE COURT: This is damages. There's no - they weren't seeking damages at the time.
+
+MR. =Mt: Right. And we have not alleged in the complaint or in the answers to interrogatories that her ability to have <sup>a</sup> relationship with <sup>a</sup>man has been affected by Mr. Epstein's conduct.
+
+We have alleged that she has been hospitalized for depression, anxiety but we have not alleged any damages concerning -- the only reason this would be relevant is if we were making a claim at her ability to have either sexual relations or to have emotional relations with men was effected by her experience with Mr. Epstein.
+
+So this damages' claim is just a smoke screen to attempt to get evidence to show the jury that this woman has had other consensual relationships with young men that are approximately her age what I would characterize as a slut defense. She had it coming to her because she engaged in other voluntarily consensual --
+
+THE COURT: Mr. Critton wouldn't try the slut defense in my courtroom, I'm sure.
+
+1 2 3 MR. : Maybe not, but certainly that's the way this discovery is going. And, Judge, what --
+
+4 5 THE COURT: What are the damages you think your client is seeking?
+
+6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 MR. : She is seeking emotional distress damages for depression and anxiety and she has been hospitalized at the Oakwood Center. Her friend -- she was on the phone to a friend who called the sheriff's office because she thought she was suicidal. The sheriffs responded. They Baker Acted her that day and they took her eventually to the Oakwood Center.
+
+14 15 16 THE COURT: How do we know it's not intertwined with her rejection by three other men since Mr. Epstein?
+
+17 18 19 MR. : Well, even if it was related to her rejection by three other men -- you mean other men's rejection of her?
+
+20 21 22 23 THE COURT: Yeah. Well, how do you not know that? I mean you can't do it until you do discovery. Has anybody attempted to review the records from Oakwood to find out what's going on?
+
+24 25 MR. CRITTON: It's like a one-time visit when she was Baker Acted and then there's some
+
+other --
+
+THE COURT: She didn't receive treatment?
+
+MR. CRITTON: She received treatment for that day and she's been back a couple of times. She's on medication. Again, I don't know what or the extent but she's got -- her medical bills are de minimis.
+
+Again as an example, Judge, did the Court have an opportunity to look at the case that I also attached to the motion? Because there's a case that's almost on all fours with this which I attached to our motion which is called Balles versus Russo.
+
+THE COURT: Right.
+
+MR. CRITTON: It was a case where the plaintiff was sued -- the plaintiff sued the former owners of a house of prostitution. So that part is different, but within it there were a number of claims including a sexual assault claim and they sought emotional pain, humiliation and emotional distress.
+
+Within the complaint that was filed in this particular case, she is seeking severe emotional distress, mental anguish, humiliation, embarrassment, past and future, compensatory
+
+humiliation, loss of reputation, mental anguish, pain and suffering, the same type of damages. And what the Court said --
+
+THE COURT: How old is she now?
+
+MR. : She's 21 now.
+
+MR. CRITTON: She's 21 now. What the Court said is, you know, if you'd only brought this claim under 796 evidence of past issues, it's not an issue. You can't use this defense for anything, but because you brought these other claims which include, you know, sexual assault and you're seeking damages for other causes of action since the information sought by discovery may be relevant or may lead to the discovery of admissible evidence in one or more of the other causes of action or determination of damages, we cannot conclude the trial court parted from essential requirements of law in granting --
+
+THE COURT: So in other words, she's not only seeking -- she's seeking current emotional damage as a result of this relationship and you're trying to find out if she had prior relationships that perhaps could be intertwined with it so that it's not just Mr. Epstein's --
+
+MR. CRITTON: Right. A perfect example is
+
+one of the cases that I have is there's <sup>a</sup>young lady who claims that she was molested in the past and raped, pretty significant issues, well in advance of her even meeting with Mr. Epstein. And they seem to play a large role in her psychiatric and psychological evaluation.
+
+We're going to come to the Court in this case as we have others and ask for <sup>a</sup> psychological evaluation of this lady, and if she was raped or if she was molested or just she had <sup>a</sup>bad experience or some -- whether it was <sup>a</sup> young or old man assaulted her in some fashion, that may play a role in her damages and what --
+
+THE COURT: What I'm going to allow for discovery purposes only not necessarily getting it in at the time trial are two years before her first encounter with Mr. Epstein and anything subsequent.
+
+MR. IIIIII: Judge, I just wanted to say on the record because I forgot to mention it, there's also -- I did state an objection to the identity of people that are unrepresented in this courtroom. They have rights too. So what I --
+
+THE COURT: Well, my suggestion is that you send those people a letter and tell them that
+
+you're going to disclose them and if they have <sup>a</sup> problem with it that they come to see me before you disclose it.
+
+So I'm going to give you 20 days to respond to this rather than the usual five and that will give you time to put these people on notice and if they want to come visit with me and have a John Doe, I'll have aJohn Doe hearing but, you know, this is her case. She's doing it. She's the one seeking damages, and he is entitled to be able to confront other individuals to find out information that may be relevant to the damages she's seeking or she can drop the damages. That's her choice. If you seek damages, you've got to do it -- if you could put that in an order so that we have atime for him to do this.
+
+Just fill out an order, hand it back up to me and I'll deal with it.
+
+(The proceedings were concluded.)
+
+1
+
+2
+
+3
+
+4
+
+5
+
+6
+
+7
+
+8
+
+9
+
+10
+
+11
+
+12
+
+13
+
+14
+
+15
+
+16
+
+17
+
+18
+
+19
+
+20
+
+21
+
+22
+
+23
+
+24
+
+25
+
+THE STATE COUNTY OF OF FLORIDA, PALM BEACH.
+
+REPORTER'S CERTIFICATE
+
+I, Teresa Bell, Court Reporter, certify that <sup>I</sup>was authorized to and did stenographically report the foregoing proceedings and that the transcript is <sup>a</sup> true and complete record of my stenographic notes.
+
+<sup>I</sup>further certify that the proceedings were taken at the time and place shown herein and that all counsel and persons as hereinabove shown were present.
+
+<sup>I</sup>further certify that I am not arelative, employee, attorney or counsel of any of the parties, nor am I arelative or employee of any of the parties' attorney or counsel connected with the action, nor am <sup>I</sup>financially interested in the action.
+
+Dated this 11th day
+
+TERESi BELL, Court Reporter
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739721/EFTA02739721.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739721/EFTA02739721.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f85018009745c4a5ebddf84f58a2041d327ce0e1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739721/EFTA02739721.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,555 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739721.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 14,
+  "chars": 12861,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 2.05,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "IN THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT \nIN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA \nCASE NO. 50 2008CA020614XXXXMB AF",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            171.972,
+            81.0
+          ],
+          [
+            513.2236328125,
+            81.0
+          ],
+          [
+            513.2236328125,
+            145.4710693359375
+          ],
+          [
+            171.972,
+            145.4710693359375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "APPEARANCES:",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            123.01200000000001,
+            103.68
+          ],
+          [
+            235.57574462890625,
+            103.68
+          ],
+          [
+            235.57574462890625,
+            118.85107421875
+          ],
+          [
+            123.01200000000001,
+            118.85107421875
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            46
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            23
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            11
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            85
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            43
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            95
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            48
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            9
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            104
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            52
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            110
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            55
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            108
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            54
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            109
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            55
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            14
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            275
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            55
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            31
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            110
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            55
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 9,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            110
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            55
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 10,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            110
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            55
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 11,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            308
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            54
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 12,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            265
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            50
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 13,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            215
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            50
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            32
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739721"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739735/EFTA02739735.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739735/EFTA02739735.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9d3ec04e42e220a9e2c632e1c954d451bb55731f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739735/EFTA02739735.md
@@ -0,0 +1,135 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3
+
+Plaintiff, v.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFF, JANE DOE NO. 3, To ANSWER DEFENDANT'S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES AND TO OVERRULE OBJECTIONS, AND FOR AN AWARD OF DEFENDANT'S REASONABLE EXPENSES
+
+Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, by and through his undersigned attorneys, moves this Court for an order compelling Plaintiff, JANE DOE No. 3 to answer Defendant's First Set of Interrogatories and to overrule her objections asserted in Plaintiffs Answers To Defendant's First Interrogatories, dated January 26, 2009. Defendant further seeks an award of his reasonable expenses, including expenses, associated with the making of this motion. Rule 37, Fed.R.Civ.P. (2008); Local Gen. Rules 7.1 and 26.1 H (S.D. Fla. 2008). In support of his motion, Defendant states:
+
+## Introduction
+
+Prior to the filing of this motion, counsel for Defendant and counsel for Plaintiff corresponded with each other and were able to resolve some of the discovery issues related to Defendant's First Interrogatories and Plaintiffs answers and objections thereto. By letter, dated March 3, 2009, the Plaintiff agreed to withdraw her "General Objections" set forth in her response. As well, issues as to interrogatories nos. 10 and 14 are presently resolved.
+
+Also, Defendant has filed simultaneously with this motion a Motion To Compel directed to certain of Plaintiffs Responses to Defendant's First Request To Produce, also dated January 26, 2009, and which addresses identical discovery issues. Both motions should be determined at the same time.
+
+# Motion To Compel Answers to Interrogatories Nos. 18, 19, 20, and 21
+
+18. List separately the names, addresses and phone numbers of all males, excluding Mr. Epstein, with whom you have had sexual activity since age 10 (by year) up through your current age. Describe the nature of sexual activity, the date(s) and whether you received money or other consideration from the person
+
+19. List separately the names, addresses and phone numbers of all males, excluding your claims against Mr. Epstein, whom you have claimed (formally or informally) committed sexual assault or battery on you since age 10 (by year) up through your current age. Describe the nature of sexual assault or battery, the date(s) and whether you received money or other consideration from the person
+
+20. State the names, addresses and phone numbers of all males, excluding your claims against Mr. Epstein, whom you have claimed (formally or informally) committed lewd or lascivious conduct to you since age 10 (by year) up through your current age. Describe the lewd or lascivious conduct, the date and whether you received money or other consideration from the person
+
+21. State the names, addresses and phone numbers of all males, excluding your claims against Mr. Epstein, whom you have claimed (formally or informally) committed lewd or lascivious exhibition to you since age 10 (by year) up through your current age. Describe the lewd or lascivious exhibition, the date and whether you received money or other consideration from the person
+
+Plaintiff asserted the identical answer to each of the above stated interrogatories:
+
+## Answer:
+
+Plaintiff objects to this interrogatory as vague, overly broad, unduly burdensome, harassing, and not reasonably calculated to lead to discovery of admissible evidence. Moreover, this interrogatory is outrageous, offensive and apparently posed for the purpose of intimidating the victim. Fed.R.Evid. 412 makes any answer to this interrogatory inadmissible, and nothing in the answer could plausibly lead to discovery of admissible evidence.
+
+## Legal Argument Supporting Entitlement to Discovery
+
+Plaintiff does not make a relevancy objection, but instead claims that the requests are "not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence," claiming that such "evidence ... would not be admissible under Fed.R.Evid. 412." Plaintiff further claims, without making any showing in her answer and without moving for a protective order in accordance with Rule 26(c) and Local Gen. Rule 26.1 H (S.D. Fla. 2008), that the interrogatory is "harassing,' "outrageous, offensive and is apparently posed for the purpose of intimidating Plaintiff."
+
+It is well settled that relevant information is discoverable, even if not admissible at trial, so long as the discovery is reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Rule 26(b)(1), Fed.R.Civ.P.; Donahav v. Palm Beach Tours & trans. Inc., 242 F.R.D. 685 (S.D. Fla. 2007). Contrary to Plaintiffs assertion, Rule 412 does not automatically result in a determination that such sexual history and sexual activity/behavior information is never admissible. In fact, written into the Rule are the procedures to follow in determining when such information is admissible at trial. The Advisory Committee Notes to Rule 412, Fed.R.Evid, makes clear that the procedures to determine admissibility of an alleged victim's/plaintiffs sexual conduct or activity in civil cases does not apply to discovery of such information. Rather, discoverability of such information is governed by Rule 26, Fed.R.Civ.P., pursuant to which the scope of discovery is broad. Donahay, supra, at 686, and cases cited therein. "Parties may obtain discovery regarding any matter, not privileged, which is relevant to the claims or defense of any party involved in the pending action." Id.
+
+Rule 412, entitled "Sex Offense Cases; Relevance of Alleged Victim's Past Sexual Behavior or Alleged Sexual Predisposition," provides in relevant part -
+
+(a) Evidence generally inadmissible.—The following evidence is not admissible in any civil ... proceeding involving alleged sexual misconduct except as provided in subdivisions (b) and (c):
+
+(1) Evidence offered to prove that any alleged victim engaged in other sexual behavior.
+
+(2) Evidence offered to prove any alleged victim's sexual predisposition.
+
+(b) Exceptions.—
+
+(2) In a civil case, evidence offered to prove the sexual behavior or sexual predisposition of any alleged victim is admissible if it is otherwise admissible under these rules and its probative value substantially outweighs the danger of harm to any victim and of unfair prejudice to any party. Evidence of an alleged victim's reputation is admissible only if it has been placed in controversy by the alleged victim.
+
+(c) Procedure to determine admissibility.--
+
+(1) A party intending to offer evidence under subdivision (b) must-
+
+(A) file a written motion at least 14 days before trial specifically describing the evidence and stating the purpose for which it is offered unless the court, for good cause requires a different time for filing or permits filing during trial; and
+
+(B) serve the motion on all parties and notify the alleged victim or, when appropriate, the alleged victim's guardian or representative.
+
+(2) Before admitting evidence under this rule the court must conduct a hearing in camera and afford the victim and parties a right to attend and be heard. The motion, related papers, and the record of the hearing must be sealed and remain under seal unless the court orders otherwise.
+
+In confirming that Rule 412 does not control the discoverability of such information, the Advisory Committee Notes (1994 Amendments) state -
+
+The procedures set forth in subdivision (c) do not apply to discovery of a victim's past sexual conduct or predisposition in civil cases, which will be continued to be governed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26. In order not to undermine the rationale of Rule 412, however, courts should enter appropriate orders pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 (c) to protect the victim against unwarranted inquiries and to ensure confidentiality. Courts should presumptively issue protective orders barring discovery unless the party seeking discovery makes a showing that
+
+the evidence sought to be discovered would be relevant under the facts and theories of the particular case, and cannot be obtained except through discovery. In an action for sexual harassment, for instance, while some evidence of the alleged victim's sexual behavior and/or predisposition in the workplaceal. &perhaps be relevant, non-work place conduct will usually be irrelevant. Cf. v. McGregor Electronic Industries, Inc., 989 F.2d 959, 962- 63 (8th Cir. 1993) (posing for a nude magazine outside work hours is irrelevant to issue of unwelcomeness of sexual advances at work). Confidentiality orders should be presumptively granted as well.
+
+(Emphasis added).
+
+In accordance with Rule 412 and Rule 26, the discovery sought regarding Plaintiffs sexual activity with males, including whether she received any compensation or consideration therefore, in interrogatory no. 18, whether she claims other males committed sexual assault or battery on her in no. 19, whether she claims other males committed lewd and lascivious conduct to her in no. 20, and whether other males committed lewd or lascivious exhibition to her in no. 21, are all relevant to Plaintiffs damages claims and the type of injury she claims she has suffered. Defendant has no other means of obtaining such information and obtaining such information through Plaintiff will better protect the confidentiality until the Court can make a determination in accordance with the procedures under Rule 412(c) whether such information will be admissible at trial. See Rule 412(c) quoted above. Defendant will agree to an order keeping the confidentiality of the information obtained through discovery.
+
+The evidence sought is relevant based on the facts and theories of this action. In her Second Amended Complaint, Plaintiff attempts to allege claims in Count I for "Sexual Assault and Battery," Count II for "Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress," and in Count III for "Coercion and Enticement to Sexual Activity in Violation of 18 U.S.C.A. §2422," and seeks damages pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §2255(a). (Plaintiff alleges
+
+diversity of citizenship as a basis for this Court's jurisdiction. 2d Am. Complaint, ¶5). Counts I and II are brought pursuant to state law.
+
+In her complaint, Plaintiff alleges that "she has suffered and will continue to suffer severe and permanent traumatic injuries, including mental, psychological and emotional damages," and "severe mental anguish and pain." She also seeks compensatory damages for her alleged injuries. 2d Am. Complaint,¶¶21, 27, 33, and "Wherefore" clauses. In her answers to interrogatories nos. 9 and 10, Plaintiff further states that:
+
+Plaintiff has suffered severe psychological and emotional injuries, including without limitation, anxiety, depression, suicidal ideation, guilt, self-blame, feelings of being degraded, feeling unattractive, diminished sense of femininity, fluctuations in weight/appetite, sexual intimacy problems, flashbacks, disturbing memories, stress, irritability, feelings of being isolated and trapped, diminished trust, social problems, problems in personal relationships, indecisiveness, lower energy, lower ambition and initiative, headaches, back pain, feels stress (particularly around men), obsessive thoughts, problems concentrating, alcohol abuse, corruption of morals and values, loss of innocence, and cries a lot. (Interrog. No. 9).
+
+... she seeks damages arising from her psychological and emotional injuries. These damages include pain and suffering, costs of psychological care and treatment, and loss of earning capacity. ... (Interrog. No. 10).
+
+Plaintiff also alleges that " a Palm Beach Community College student," was a part of "Epstein's plan and scheme (which) reflected a particular pattern and method" in the alleged recruiting of girl's to come to EPSTEIN's Palm Beach mansion and give him "massages" in exchange for money. 2nd Am. Complaint, ¶10-12. According to the complaint allegations — "Upon information and belief Epstein has a sexual preference and obsession for underage minor girls." ¶8. The "girl would be led up a flight of stairs to a bedroom that contained a massage table ... The girl would be alone with EPSTEIN; "Epstein would then perform one or more lewd, lascivious and sexual acts, including masturbation and touching the girl sexually." 2nd Am. Complaint,
+
+¶11, 12. Plaintiff alleges that "in 2004-2005," she, "then approximately 16 years old, fell into Epstein's trap and became one of his victims." ¶8. Plaintiff alleges that Epstein "sexually assaulted" her and "masturbated during the massage." ¶12 Plaintiff further alleges that "Epstein committed willful acts of child sexual abuse" on her, which resulted in "mental or sexual injury," and "caused or likely to cause Jane Doe's mental or emotional health to be significantly impaired." 2d Am. Complaint, ¶25.
+
+The information sought is clearly relevant to the injuries and damages claimed by Plaintiff. The nature of her claimed injuries and damages are such that Defendant is entitled to evidence which would show the nature of her relationship with males, whether she has suffered other acts of sexual misconduct as alleged in her complaint, and whether she suffered injury and damages as a result of the other claimed sexual misconduct with males. See United States v. Bear Stops, 997 F.2d 451 (8th Cir. 1993)(Defendant charged with sexual abuse of six year old boy was entitled to admission of evidence relating to victim's sexual assault by 3 older boys to establish alternative explanation for why victim exhibited behavioral manifestations of sexually abused child.).
+
+In further support of Defendant's motion, a copy of Balas v. Ruzzo, 703 So.2d 1076 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997), rev. denied, 719 So.2d 286 (Fla. 1998), is attached hereto as Exhibit A as it is on point to the discovery issues in this action, and the relevancy and discoverability of Plaintiffs history of sexual activity and any payment, therefore. See interrogatories 8, 22 and 30 propounded in the Balas case and footnote 1 herein.
+
+In Balas v. Ruzzo, supra, the Plaintiffs alleged a multicount complaint including claims for "coercion of prostitution" pursuant to §796.09, Fla. Stat.; for battery for the unwanted and offensive touching of petitioners' bodies; false imprisonment for physically confining the petitioners against their will; invasion of privacy; and intentional infliction of emotional distress.
+
+Additionally and significantly, in other pending state court civil actions against Defendant EPSTEIN attempting to assert similar claims and damages, the Circuit Court Judges have already ruled that such information is discoverable as it is relevant to the damages claims of Plaintiff. See Composite Exhibits B and C hereto. Composite Exhibit B are the Orders, dated February 23, 2009, entered in the case of A.C. v. Epstein, and Case No. 502008CA025129 MB AI, 15th Judicial Circuit, In and For Palm Beach County, State of Florida, which granted Defendant's motion to compel therein directed to discovery identical to interrogatory no. 18 above, and to requests for production nos. 17 and 18 addressed below herein. (In the A.C. case, the Plaintiff answered without objection interrogatories identical to nos. 19, 20, and 21 herein.) Composite Exhibit C is a portion the transcript from a March 3, 2009 hearing on Defendant's motion to compel discovery in the case of Jane Doe II v. Epstein, and Case No. 502008CA020614 MB AF, 15th Judicial Circuit Court, In and For Palm Beach County, State of Florida. Again, the Circuit Court Judge determined that the information sought is relevant to the issue of damages and, thus, discoverable.
+
+WHEREFORE, Defendant requests that this Court grant his motion to compel and award his attorney's fees and costs, associated with this motion, in accordance with Rule 37, Fed.R.Civ.P., and applicable Local Rules.
+
+## Rule 7.1 Certification
+
+I hereby certify that counsel for the respective parties communicated by letters in a good faith effort to resolve the discovery issues prior to the fili of this motion to compel. Some of the issues were resolved.
+
+> Robert D. C tton, Jr. Attorney f. Defendant Epstein
+
+### Certificate of Service
+
+I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record identified on the following Service List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on this 21<sup>st</sup> day of April, 2009:
+
+Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq.  
+Adam D. Horowitz, Esq.  
+Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A.  
+18205 Biscayne Boulevard  
+Suite 2218  
+Miami, FL 33160  
+305-931-2200  
+Fax: 305-931-0877  
+[ssm@sexabuseattorney.com](mailto:ssm@sexabuseattorney.com)  
+[ahorowitz@sexabuseattorney.com](mailto:ahorowitz@sexabuseattorney.com)  
+Counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe #2
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger  
+Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.  
+250 Australian Avenue South  
+Suite 1400  
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012  
+561-659-8300  
+Fax: 561-835-8691  
+[jagesq@bellsouth.net](mailto:jagesq@bellsouth.net)  
+*Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein*
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+![]()*(Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein)*
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739735/EFTA02739735.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739735/EFTA02739735.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..90f7b247a4027fd64d40179d89eb49970c61ccbe
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739735/EFTA02739735.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,531 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739735.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 9,
+  "chars": 17176,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 5.39,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            203.18400000000003,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            412.0299987792969,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            412.0299987792969,
+            100.29998779296875
+          ],
+          [
+            203.18400000000003,
+            100.29998779296875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFF, \nJANE DOE NO. 3, To ANSWER DEFENDANT'S FIRST SET OF \nINTERROGATORIES AND TO OVERRULE OBJECTIONS, AND \nFOR AN AWARD OF DEFENDANT'S REASONABLE EXPENSES",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            125.46000000000001,
+            277.83000000000004
+          ],
+          [
+            491.90869140625,
+            277.83000000000004
+          ],
+          [
+            491.90869140625,
+            335.79998779296875
+          ],
+          [
+            125.46000000000001,
+            335.79998779296875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Introduction",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            274.176,
+            540.9375
+          ],
+          [
+            344.84320068359375,
+            540.9375
+          ],
+          [
+            344.84320068359375,
+            555.5500030517578
+          ],
+          [
+            274.176,
+            555.5500030517578
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Motion To Compel Answers to Interrogatories Nos. 18, 19, 20, and 21",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            123.62400000000002,
+            180.63
+          ],
+          [
+            493.22412109375,
+            180.63
+          ],
+          [
+            493.22412109375,
+            198.16998291015625
+          ],
+          [
+            123.62400000000002,
+            198.16998291015625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Answer:",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            70.992,
+            553.23
+          ],
+          [
+            126.83305358886719,
+            553.23
+          ],
+          [
+            126.83305358886719,
+            569.7899932861328
+          ],
+          [
+            70.992,
+            569.7899932861328
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Legal Argument Supporting Entitlement to Discovery",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            165.24,
+            72.08999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            450.739501953125,
+            72.08999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            450.739501953125,
+            87.91998291015625
+          ],
+          [
+            165.24,
+            87.91998291015625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Rule 7.1 Certification",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            252.144,
+            569.4300000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            368.07135009765625,
+            569.4300000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            368.07135009765625,
+            584.8000030517578
+          ],
+          [
+            252.144,
+            584.8000030517578
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Certificate of Service",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            261.936,
+            84.24
+          ],
+          [
+            385.56000000000006,
+            84.24
+          ],
+          [
+            385.56000000000006,
+            98.01
+          ],
+          [
+            261.936,
+            98.01
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            55
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            71
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            36
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            9
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            59
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            73
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            37
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            15
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            63
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            31
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            70
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            33
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            67
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            29
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            59
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            14
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739735"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739744/EFTA02739744.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739744/EFTA02739744.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8ea4cd164994311607fab2321ef4927d7ab29895
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739744/EFTA02739744.md
@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA-MM
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+v.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S ANSWER & AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
+
+Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, (hereinafter "EPSTEIN"), by and through his undersigned attorneys, files his Answer to the Second Amended Complaint and states:
+
+- 1. Without knowledge and deny.
+
+2. As to the allegations in paragraphs 2, Defendant asserts his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. See DeLisi v. Bankers Ins. Company, 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Malloy v. Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment - "[ijt would be incongruous to have different standards determine the validity of a claim of privilege based on the same feared prosecution, depending on whether the claim was asserted in state or federal court."); 5 Fed.Prac. & Proc. Civ. 3d §1280 Effect of Failure to Deny — Privilege Against Self-Incrimination ("...court must treat the defendant's claim of privilege as equivalent to a specific denial."). See also 24 Fla.Jur.2d Evidence §592. Defendants in civil actions. — .. a civil defendant who raises an affirmative defense is not precluded from asserting
+
+the privilege [against self-incrimination], because affirmative defenses do not constitute the kind of voluntary application for affirmative relief' which would prevent a plaintiff bringing a claim seeking affirmative relief from asserting the privilege.
+
+- 3. As to the allegations in paragraph 3, deny.
+- 4. As to the allegations in paragraph 4, deny.
+- 5. As to the allegations in paragraph 5, without knowledge and deny.
+
+6. As to the allegations in paragraphs 6, Defendant asserts his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. See DeLisi v. Bankers Ins. Company, 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 491 DCA 1983); Malloy v. Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment - "ult would be incongruous to have different standards determine the validity of a claim of privilege based on the same feared prosecution, depending on whether the claim was asserted in state or federal court."); 5 Fed.Prac. & Proc. Civ. 3d §1280 Effect of Failure to Deny — Privilege Against Self-Incrimination ("...court must treat the defendant's claim of privilege as equivalent to a specific denial."). See also 24 Fla.Jur.2d Evidence §592. Defendants in civil actions. — "... a civil defendant who raises an affirmative defense is not precluded from asserting the privilege [against self-incrimination], because affirmative defenses do not constitute the kind of voluntary application for affirmative relief" which would prevent a plaintiff bringing a claim seeking affirmative relief from asserting the privilege.
+
+7. As to the allegations in paragraphs 7 through 14 of Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint, Defendant exercises his Fifth Amendment Privilege against self-
+
+incrimination. See DeLisi v. Bankers Ins. Company, 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 41h DCA 1983); Malloy v. Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment - "[i]t would be incongruous to have different standards determine the validity of a claim of privilege based on the same feared prosecution, depending on whether the claim was asserted in state or federal court."); 5 Fed.Prac. & Proc. Civ. 3d §1280 Effect of Failure to Deny — Privilege Against Self-Incrimination ("...court must treat the defendant's claim of privilege as equivalent to a specific denial."). See also 24 Fla.Jur.2d Evidence §592. Defendants in civil actions. —"... a civil defendant who raises an affirmative defense is not precluded from asserting the privilege [against self-incrimination], because affirmative defenses do not constitute the kind of voluntary application for affirmative relief" which would prevent a plaintiff bringing a claim seeking affirmative relief from asserting the privilege.
+
+8. In response to the allegations of paragraph 15, Defendant realleges and adopts his responses to paragraphs 1 through 14 of the Second Amended Complaint set forth in paragraphs 1 through 6 above herein.
+
+9. Defendant asserts the Fifth Amendment Privilege against self-incrimination to the allegations set forth in paragraphs 16 through 21 of the Second Amended Complaint. See DeLisi v. Bankers Ins. Company, 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Malloy v. Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment - "[i]t would be incongruous to have different standards determine the
+
+validity of a claim of privilege based on the same feared prosecution, depending on whether the claim was asserted in state or federal court."); 5 Fed.Prac. & Proc. Civ. 3d §1280 Effect of Failure to Deny — Privilege Against Self-Incrimination ("...court must treat the defendant's claim of privilege as equivalent to a specific denial"). See also 24 Fla.Jur.2d Evidence §592. Defendants in civil actions. —"... a civil defendant who raises an affirmative defense is not precluded from asserting the privilege [against selfincrimination], because affirmative defenses do not constitute the kind of voluntary application for affirmative relief which would prevent a plaintiff bringing a claim seeking affirmative relief from asserting the privilege.
+
+10. In response to the allegations of paragraph 22, Defendant realleges and adopts his responses to paragraphs 1 through 14 of the Second Amended Complaint set forth in paragraphs 1 through 6 above herein.
+
+11. Defendant asserts the Fifth Amendment Privilege against self-incrimination to the allegations set forth in paragraphs 23 through 27 of the Second Amended Complaint. See DeLisi v. Bankers Ins. Company, 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Malloy v. Hogan 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Setf-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment - "lilt would be incongruous to have different standards determine the validity of a claim of privilege based on the same feared prosecution, depending on whether the claim was asserted in state or federal court."). 5 Fed.Prac. & Proc. Civ. 3d §1280 Effect of Failure to Deny — Privilege Against Self-Incrimination ("...court must treat the defendant's claim of privilege as equivalent to a specific denial."). See also 24
+
+Fla.Jur.2d Evidence §592. Defendants in civil actions. — "... a civil defendant who raises an affirmative defense is not precluded from asserting the privilege [against selfincrimination], because affirmative defenses do not constitute the kind of voluntary application for affirmative relief" which would prevent a plaintiff bringing a claim seeking affirmative relief from asserting the privilege.
+
+12. In response to the allegations of paragraph 28, Defendant realleges and adopts his responses to paragraphs 1 through 14 of the Second Amended Complaint set forth in paragraphs 1 through 6 above herein.
+
+13. Defendant asserts the Fifth Amendment Privilege against self-incrimination to the allegations set forth in paragraphs 29 through 34 of the Second Amended Complaint. See DeLisi v. Bankers Ins. Company, 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Malloy v. Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment - "[i]t would be incongruous to have different standards determine the validity of a claim of privilege based on the same feared prosecution, depending on whether the claim was asserted in state or federal court."); 5 Fed.Prac. & Proc. Civ. 3d §1280 Effect of Failure to Deny - Privilege Against Self-Incrimination ("...court must treat the defendant's claim of privilege as equivalent to a specific denial."). See also 24 Fla.Jur.2d Evidence §592. Defendants in civil actions. — "... a civil defendant who raises an affirmative defense is not precluded from asserting the privilege [against selfincrimination], because affirmative defenses do not constitute the kind of voluntary
+
+application for affirmative relief' which would prevent a plaintiff bringing a claim seeking affirmative relief from asserting the privilege.
+
+WHEREFORE, Defendant requests that this Court deny the relief sought by Plaintiff.
+
+## Affirmative Defenses
+
+- 1. As to all counts, Plaintiff consented to and was a willing participant in the acts alleged.
+- 2. As to all counts alleged, Plaintiff consented to and participated in conduct similar and/or identical to the acts alleged with other persons which were the sole or contributing cause of Plaintiffs alleged damages
+- 3. As to all counts, Defendant reasonably believed that the Plaintiff had attained the age of 18 years old at the time of the alleged acts.
+  - 4. Plaintiffs claims are barred by the applicable statute of limitations.
+
+WHEREFORE Defendant requests that this Court deny the re f sought by Plaintiff.
+
+Robert D. Attorney f itton, Jr. Defendant Epstein
+
+## Certificate of Service
+
+I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of rec9r dentified on the following Service List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on this day of April , 2009:
+
+Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq.  
+Adam D. Horowitz, Esq.  
+Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A.  
+18205 Biscayne Boulevard  
+Suite 2218  
+Miami, FL 33160  
+305-931-2200  
+Fax: 305-931-0877  
+[ssm@sexabuseattorney.com](mailto:ssm@sexabuseattorney.com)  
+[ahorowitz@sexabuseattorney.com](mailto:ahorowitz@sexabuseattorney.com)  
+Counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe #3
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger  
+Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.  
+250 Australian Avenue South  
+Suite 1400  
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012  
+561-659-8300  
+Fax: 561-835-8691  
+[jagesq@bellsouth.net](mailto:jagesq@bellsouth.net)  
+*Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein*
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+![]()
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739744/EFTA02739744.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739744/EFTA02739744.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ec9ceac527d9fe510112049ad8c3ac12d6dc06b7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739744/EFTA02739744.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,379 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739744.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 7,
+  "chars": 10325,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 4.0,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            200.73600000000002,
+            85.05
+          ],
+          [
+            411.6600036621094,
+            85.05
+          ],
+          [
+            411.6600036621094,
+            116.04998779296875
+          ],
+          [
+            200.73600000000002,
+            116.04998779296875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S ANSWER & AFFIRMATIVE \nDEFENSES TO PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            126.68399999999998,
+            282.68999999999994
+          ],
+          [
+            486.70343017578125,
+            282.68999999999994
+          ],
+          [
+            486.70343017578125,
+            313.66998291015625
+          ],
+          [
+            126.68399999999998,
+            313.66998291015625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Affirmative Defenses",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            243.57600000000002,
+            187.92000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            368.9569091796875,
+            187.92000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            368.9569091796875,
+            203.79998779296875
+          ],
+          [
+            243.57600000000002,
+            203.79998779296875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Certificate of Service",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            263.772,
+            603.45
+          ],
+          [
+            388.87005615234375,
+            603.45
+          ],
+          [
+            388.87005615234375,
+            618.1800079345703
+          ],
+          [
+            263.772,
+            618.1800079345703
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            60
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            9
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            59
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            66
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            60
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            57
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739744"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739751/EFTA02739751.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739751/EFTA02739751.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9f4a11354407da598f50a5d1edeaf714f10099f6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739751/EFTA02739751.md
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA=M
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 4, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 5, CASE NO.: 08-CV-8038I-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+ORDER
+
+Upon Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time to File Reply Memoranda in Support of Motions to Compel Answers to Interrogatories and Production of Documents, and good cause being shown, it is hereby
+
+ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion is granted. Plaintiffs shall have an enlargement of time of two (2) weeks, until April 20, 2009, to file reply memoranda in support of the Motions to Compel Answers to Interrogatories and Production of Documents.
+
+DONE AND ORDERED in in Ft. Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida, this day of 2009.
+
+DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739751/EFTA02739751.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739751/EFTA02739751.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..eb6cd4f234f3a6ebcb5bfe55cfce4e00d9abfd29
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739751/EFTA02739751.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,120 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739751.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 2,
+  "chars": 996,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.12,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            405.95098876953125,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            405.95098876953125,
+            115.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            115.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            49
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            21
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            21
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            11
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739751"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739753/EFTA02739753.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739753/EFTA02739753.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a723d6ac681a37fc8c219d62ece4aa1a146d85ff
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739753/EFTA02739753.md
@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 013-CV-80232-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+/
+
+JANE DOE NO. 4, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MAR
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 5, CASE NO.: 08-CV-8038I-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+PLAINTIFFS' UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME
+
+## TO FILE REPLY MEMORANDA IN SUPPORT OF MOTIONS TO COMPEL ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES AND PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS
+
+Plaintiffs, JANE DOES 2-5, by and through undersigned counsel, file this Motion for Enlargement to Time to File Reply Memoranda in Support of Motion to Compel Answers to Interrogatories and Production of Documents, pursuant to S.D. FIa.L.R. 7.1 and Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(b), and state as follows:
+
+I. Plaintiffs in the above-styled cases filed Motions to Compel Answers to Interrogatories and Production of Documents on March 2, 2009. Defendant Jeffrey Epstein served Memoranda in opposition to these Motions on March 25, 2009.
+
+2. Plaintiffs move for an enlargement of time to prepare and file their replies in support of the Motions because of demands on Plaintiffs' counsel in other cases and matters. In particular, Plaintiffs' counsel has an initial appeal brief due in Doe v. School Bd. of Broward County and Scavella case no. 09 -10394-E, Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. Plaintiffs' counsel also has an impending discovery deadline in v. Archdiocese of New York, case no. 10069-06, Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York.
+
+3. The Plaintiffs' replies in support of the subject Motions are presently due on April 6, 2009. Plaintiffs request an enlargement of time of two (2) weeks, until April 20, 2009.
+
+4. Pursuant to S.D.Fla.L.R. 7.1(A), Plaintiffs' counsel has conferred with counsel for Defendant regarding the relief sought in this Motion, who has advised Plaintiffs' counsel that Defendant has no objection to the enlargement of time requested.
+
+WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully request an enlargement of time to file reply memoranda in support of the Motions to Compel Answers to Interrogatories and Production of Documents, until and including April 20, 2009.
+
+Dated: April 3, 2009
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+By: s/ Stuart S. Mermelstein Smart S. Mermelstein (FL Bar No. 947245) ssm@sexabuseattorney.com Adam D. Horowitz (FL Bar No. 376980) ahorowitz@sexabuseattornev.com MERMELSTEIN & HOROWITZ, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintifs 18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160 Tel: 305-931-2200 Fax: 305-931-0877
+
+## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
+
+I hereby certify that on April 3, 2009, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day to all parties on the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those parties who are not authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing.
+
+Is/ Stuart S. Mermelstein
+
+## SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN United States District Court. Southern District of Florida
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. igoldberger@agwpa.com
+
+Robert D. Critton, Esq. reritton@bc1claw.com
+
+/s/ Stuart S. Mermelstein
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739753/EFTA02739753.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739753/EFTA02739753.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2b58b7f143f8ba2bf41b592840341cad610a3894
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739753/EFTA02739753.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,303 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739753.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 5,
+  "chars": 3393,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.32,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            85.05
+          ],
+          [
+            406.76995849609375,
+            85.05
+          ],
+          [
+            406.76995849609375,
+            115.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            115.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "TO FILE REPLY MEMORANDA IN SUPPORT OF MOTIONS TO COMPEL \nANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES AND PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            95.47200000000001,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            517.73095703125,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            517.73095703125,
+            115.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            95.47200000000001,
+            115.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            227.66400000000002,
+            85.05
+          ],
+          [
+            386.50201416015625,
+            85.05
+          ],
+          [
+            386.50201416015625,
+            100.863037109375
+          ],
+          [
+            227.66400000000002,
+            100.863037109375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "SERVICE LIST \nDOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN \nUnited States District Court. Southern District of Florida",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            156.67200000000003,
+            85.05
+          ],
+          [
+            455.16455078125,
+            85.05
+          ],
+          [
+            455.16455078125,
+            129.7330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            156.67200000000003,
+            129.7330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            22
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            31
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            16
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            19
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            23
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            11
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739753"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739758/EFTA02739758.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739758/EFTA02739758.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e8c4c2b3b841d0b3e47234a8ef4e2ac4e6afc1ec
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739758/EFTA02739758.md
@@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRAMMII
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff, v.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+Defendant's Motion For Extension Of Time In Which To Respond To Plaintiffs Motion For Protective Against Piecemeal Depositions Of Jane Doe. No.3, Motion To Consolidate Cases For Purposes Of Discovery And Incorporated Memorandum Of Law
+
+Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, (hereinafter "Epstein") by and through his undersigned attorneys, respectfully moves this Court for an extension of time in which to respond to Plaintiffs Motion For Protective Against Piecemeal Depositions Of Jane Doe. No.3, Motion To Consolidate Cases For Purposes Of Discovery And Incorporated Memorandum Of Law
+
+("Motion"). Local General Rule 7.1 A.1 and Rule 6, Fed. R. Civ. P. (2009). Defendant seeks an extension until April 13, 2009 to file his response. As good cause in support of granting the motion, Defendant states:
+
+- 1. Defendant's response to the Motion is due on or about April 6, 2009.
+- 2. Plaintiffs counsel also represents five (5) other Plaintiffs pursuing claims against Defendant, EPSTEIN, most of which have filed similar Motions. In order to fully and
+
+Jane Doe No. 3 v. Epstein Page 2
+
+adequately respond to this and the other motions, Defendant is in need of an extension until April 13, 2009.
+
+3. In addition to the multiple motions, good cause for the extension also includes that counsel has been attempting to resolve discovery issues in this and other cases against Defendant, EPSTEIN; an associate of Defendants undersigned counsel who works extensively on this case is currently out of the office and the undersigned was working on and has filed between 12-15 motions and responses in the various cases during the time these motions were filed.
+
+4. The requested extension is fair and reasonable under the circumstances as it will provide time to allow the Defendant, EPSTEIN, to fully and adequately respond to this and the other motions. In addition, this action is still at its early stages.
+
+5. As certified below, counsel for Defendant conferred with counsel for Plaintiff, and Plaintiffs counsel is in agreement with the requested extension.
+
+WHEREFORE, Defendant requests that this Court enter an order granting an Defendant an extension until April 13, 2009, in which to respond to the Above Motion.
+
+## Local Rule 7.1 Statement
+
+Counsel for the movant conferred by telephone \*th counsel for the Plaintiff and Counsel for Plaintiff is in agreement with the reque extension until April 009 for Defendant to respond to the Motion.
+
+Jane Doe No. 3 v. Epstein  
+Page 3
+
+**Certificate of Service**
+
+I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record identified on the following Service List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on this 6 day of April, 2009:
+
+Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq.  
+Adam D. Horowitz, Esq.  
+Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A.  
+18205 Biscayne Boulevard  
+Suite 2218  
+Miami, FL 33160  
+305-931-2200  
+Fax: 305-931-0877  
+[ssm@sexabuseattorney.com](mailto:ssm@sexabuseattorney.com)  
+[ahorowitz@sexabuseattorney.com](mailto:ahorowitz@sexabuseattorney.com)  
+*Counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe #3*
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger  
+Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.  
+250 Australian Avenue South  
+Suite 1400  
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012  
+561-659-8300  
+Fax: 561-835-8691  
+[jagesq@bellsouth.net](mailto:jagesq@bellsouth.net)  
+*Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein*
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+By:
+
+![]()Florida Bar No. 224162
+
+[rcrit@bclclaw.com](mailto:rcrit@bclclaw.com)
+
+MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ.
+
+Florida Bar #617296
+
+[mpike@bclclaw.com](mailto:mpike@bclclaw.com)
+
+BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN
+
+515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400
+
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+
+561/842-2820 Phone
+
+561/515-3148 Fax
+
+*(Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein)*
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739758/EFTA02739758.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739758/EFTA02739758.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5f59ac432b6e29f27e4d14abd54b02693e9d592f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739758/EFTA02739758.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,208 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739758.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 3,
+  "chars": 3973,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 6.11,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            200.73600000000002,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            412.0353698730469,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            412.0353698730469,
+            116.41998291015625
+          ],
+          [
+            200.73600000000002,
+            116.41998291015625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Local Rule 7.1 Statement",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            235.00799999999998,
+            520.83
+          ],
+          [
+            382.3314208984375,
+            520.83
+          ],
+          [
+            382.3314208984375,
+            533.79
+          ],
+          [
+            235.00799999999998,
+            533.79
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Certificate of Service",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            242.35200000000003,
+            107.73000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            366.58799999999997,
+            107.73000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            366.58799999999997,
+            120.69
+          ],
+          [
+            242.35200000000003,
+            120.69
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            49
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            266
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            23
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            9
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            24
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739758"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739761/EFTA02739761.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739761/EFTA02739761.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5379b3e3eaa85cf91135b377437930d3e4e0ddd9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739761/EFTA02739761.md
@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRAMIM
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+v.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## Defendant's Amended Motion For Extension Of Time In Which To Respond To Plaintiff's Motion For Protective Against Piecemeal Depositions Of Jane Doe. No.3, Motion To Consolidate Cases For Purposes Of Discovery And Incorporated Memorandum Of Law
+
+Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, (hereinafter "Epstein") by and through his undersigned attorneys, respectfully moves this Court for an extension of time in which to respond to Plaintiffs Motion For Protective Against Piecemeal Depositions Of Jane Doe. No.3, Motion To Consolidate Cases For Purposes Of Discovery And Incorporated Memorandum Of Law("Motion"). Local General Rule 7.1 A.1 and Rule 6, Fed. R. Civ. P. (2009). Defendant seeks an extension until April 16, 2009 to file his response. As good cause in support of granting the motion, Defendant states:
+
+- 1. Defendant's response to the Motion is due on or about April 6, 2009, and an extension of time was given to April 13, 2009.
+- 2. Plaintiffs counsel also represents five (5) other Plaintiffs pursuing claims against Defendant, EPSTEIN, most of which have filed similar Motions. In order to fully and
+
+Jane Doe No. 3 v. Epstein Page 2
+
+adequately respond to this and the other motions, Defendant is in need of an extension until April 16 2009.
+
+3. In addition to the multiple motions, good cause for the extension also includes that counsel has been attempting to resolve discovery issues in this and other cases against Defendant, EPSTEIN; an associate of Defendant's undersigned counsel who works extensively on this case is currently out of the office and the undersigned was working on and has filed between 12-15 motions and responses in the various cases during the time these motions were filed.
+
+4. The requested extension is fair and reasonable under the circumstances as it will provide time to allow the Defendant, EPSTEIN, to fully and adequately respond to this and the other motions. In addition, this action is still at its early stages.
+
+5. As certified below, counsel for Defendant conferred with counsel for Plaintiff, and Plaintiff's counsel is in agreement with the requested extension.
+
+WHEREFORE, Defendant requests that this Court enter an order granting an Defendant an extension until April 16, 2009, in which to respond to the Above Motion.
+
+## Local Rule 7,1 Statement
+
+Counsel for the movant conferred by telephone with counsel for the Plaintiff and Counsel for Plaintiff is in agreement with the requested extension until April 16, 2009 for Defendant to respond to the Motion.
+
+ITTON, JR., ESQ.
+
+Jane Doe No. 3 v. Epstein  
+Page 3
+
+**Certificate of Service**
+
+I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record identified on the following Service List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on this 10 day of April, 2009:
+
+Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq.  
+Adam D. Horowitz, Esq.  
+Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A.  
+18205 Biscayne Boulevard  
+Suite 2218  
+Miami, FL 33160  
+305-931-2200  
+Fax: 305-931-0877  
+[ssm@sexabuseattorney.com](mailto:ssm@sexabuseattorney.com)  
+[ahorowitz@sexabuseattorney.com](mailto:ahorowitz@sexabuseattorney.com)  
+*Counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe #3*
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger  
+Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.  
+250 Australian Avenue South  
+Suite 1400  
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012  
+561-659-8300  
+Fax: 561-835-8691  
+[jagesq@bellsouth.net](mailto:jagesq@bellsouth.net)  
+*Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein*
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+![]()
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739761/EFTA02739761.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739761/EFTA02739761.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6b7de83f7dbde4a1b1f629e910830a328395ec66
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739761/EFTA02739761.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,231 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739761.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 3,
+  "chars": 3721,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 4.52,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            195.66493225097656,
+            88.28999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            401.0919494628906,
+            88.28999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            401.0919494628906,
+            115.2030029296875
+          ],
+          [
+            195.66493225097656,
+            115.2030029296875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Defendant's Amended Motion For Extension Of Time In Which To Respond To \nPlaintiff's Motion For Protective Against Piecemeal Depositions Of Jane Doe. \nNo.3, Motion To Consolidate Cases For Purposes Of Discovery And Incorporated \nMemorandum Of Law",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            68.544,
+            308.61
+          ],
+          [
+            535.5935668945312,
+            308.61
+          ],
+          [
+            535.5935668945312,
+            364.5
+          ],
+          [
+            68.544,
+            364.5
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Local Rule 7,1 Statement",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            229.5,
+            523.26
+          ],
+          [
+            377.76141357421875,
+            523.26
+          ],
+          [
+            377.76141357421875,
+            538.3000030517578
+          ],
+          [
+            229.5,
+            538.3000030517578
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Certificate of Service",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            236.84400000000002,
+            110.16000000000003
+          ],
+          [
+            360.46799999999996,
+            110.16000000000003
+          ],
+          [
+            360.46799999999996,
+            123.12
+          ],
+          [
+            236.84400000000002,
+            123.12
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            232
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            47
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            24
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739761"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739764/EFTA02739764.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739764/EFTA02739764.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f4a72ebe333b31f45e5d459203b240701a494337
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739764/EFTA02739764.md
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA=M
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 4, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 5, CASE NO.: 08-CV-8038I-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 6, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80994-MARRA,
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 7, CASE NO.: 08- 80993-CIV-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## ORDER
+
+Upon Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time to File Memorandum in Opposition to Motion to Stay and/or Continue Action, and good cause being shown, it is hereby
+
+ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion is granted. Plaintiffs shall have an enlargement of time of ten (10) days, until April 23, 2009, to file a reply memorandum in opposition to the Defendant's Motion to Stay and/or Continue Action.
+
+DONE AND ORDERED in in Ft. Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida, this day of 2009.
+
+DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739764/EFTA02739764.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739764/EFTA02739764.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..75054594d18277c943dad2d263da1a66bb99ebc5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739764/EFTA02739764.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,147 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739764.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 2,
+  "chars": 1130,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.15,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            85.05
+          ],
+          [
+            405.95098876953125,
+            85.05
+          ],
+          [
+            405.95098876953125,
+            115.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            115.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "ORDER",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            281.52,
+            393.65999999999997
+          ],
+          [
+            330.3381042480469,
+            393.65999999999997
+          ],
+          [
+            330.3381042480469,
+            408.363037109375
+          ],
+          [
+            281.52,
+            408.363037109375
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            49
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            22
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            39
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            20
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739764"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739766/EFTA02739766.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739766/EFTA02739766.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5e6fcdb49838f65fcf9a4f861b44042f758bc5b3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739766/EFTA02739766.md
@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+/
+
+JANE DOE NO. 4, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MAR
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 5, CASE NO.: 08-CV-8038I-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 6, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80994-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 7, CASE NO.: 08- 80993-CIV-MARRA,
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## PLAINTIFFS' UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO FILE MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STAY AND/OR CONTINUE ACTION
+
+Plaintiffs, JANE DOES 2-7, by and through undersigned counsel, file this Motion for Enlargement to Time to File Memorandum in Opposition to Motion to Stay and/or Continue Action, pursuant to S.D. Fla.L.R. 7.1 and Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(b), and state as follows:
+
+- 1. Defendant Epstein filed a Motion to Stay and/or Continue Action for Time Certain Based on Parallel Civil and Criminal Proceedings, in each of the above-captioned cases, on March 25, 2009. Plaintiffs response to this Motion is due on April 13, 2009.
+- 2. Plaintiffs move for an enlargement of time to prepare and file their responses to the Motion because of demands on Plaintiffs' counsel in other cases and matters. In particular, Plaintiffs' counsel has an initial appeal brief due in Doe v. School Bd. of Broward County and
+
+Scavella case no. 09 -10394-E, Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals.
+
+- 3. Plaintiffs request an enlargement of time of ten (10) days, until April 23, 2009.
+- 4. Pursuant to S.D.Fla.L.R. 7.1(A), Plaintiffs' counsel has conferred with counsel for Defendant regarding the relief sought in this Motion, who has advised Plaintiffs' counsel that Defendant has no objection to the enlargement of time requested.
+
+WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully request an enlargement of time to file their response to the Motion to Stay et al., until and including April 23, 2009.
+
+Dated: April 23, 2009
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+By: s/ Stuart S. Mermelstein Stuart S. Mermelstein (FL Bar No. 947245) ssm@sexabuseattorney.com Adam D. Horowitz (FL Bar No. 376980) ahorowitz@sexabuseattomey.com MERMELSTEIN & HOROWITZ, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintifs 18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160 Tel: 305-931-2200 Fax: 305-931-0877
+
+## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
+
+I hereby certify that on April 23, 2009, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day to all parties on the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those parties who are not authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing.
+
+Is/ Stuart S. Mermelstein
+
+## SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. igoldberger@agwpa.com
+
+Robert D. Critton, Esq. reritton@bc1claw.com
+
+/s/ Stuart S. Mermelstein
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739766/EFTA02739766.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739766/EFTA02739766.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0222ec86c50575a80cf8ed9d74f37d79e0d46837
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739766/EFTA02739766.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,319 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739766.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 5,
+  "chars": 3196,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.35,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            85.05
+          ],
+          [
+            406.76995849609375,
+            85.05
+          ],
+          [
+            406.76995849609375,
+            115.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            115.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "PLAINTIFFS' UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT \nOF TIME TO FILE MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION \nTO MOTION TO STAY AND/OR CONTINUE ACTION",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            136.476,
+            421.20000000000005
+          ],
+          [
+            475.5215759277344,
+            421.20000000000005
+          ],
+          [
+            475.5215759277344,
+            464.60302734375
+          ],
+          [
+            136.476,
+            464.60302734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            227.66400000000002,
+            85.05
+          ],
+          [
+            386.50201416015625,
+            85.05
+          ],
+          [
+            386.50201416015625,
+            100.863037109375
+          ],
+          [
+            227.66400000000002,
+            100.863037109375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "SERVICE LIST \nDOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN \nUnited States District Court, Southern District of Florida",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            156.67200000000003,
+            85.05
+          ],
+          [
+            455.16455078125,
+            85.05
+          ],
+          [
+            455.16455078125,
+            129.7330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            156.67200000000003,
+            129.7330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            21
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            49
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            11
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            48
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            23
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            19
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            21
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            11
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739766"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739771/EFTA02739771.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739771/EFTA02739771.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c5afaae67ab8efb6c73b43b02c3993b16803e125
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739771/EFTA02739771.md
@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRAMMII
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+v.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## Defendant's Amended Motion For Extension Of Time In Which To Respond To Plaintiff's Motion For Protective Against Piecemeal Depositions Of Jane Doe. No.3, Motion To Consolidate Cases For Purposes Of Discovery And Incorporated Memorandum Of Law
+
+Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, (hereinafter "Epstein") by and through his undersigned attorneys, respectfully moves this Court for an extension of time in which to respond to Plaintiff's Motion For Protective Against Piecemeal Depositions Of Jane Doe. No.3, Motion To Consolidate Cases For Purposes Of Discovery And Incorporated Memorandum Of Law("Motion"). Local General Rule 7.1 A.1 and Rule 6, Fed. R. Civ. P. (2009). Defendant seeks an extension until April 24, 2009 to file his response. As good cause in support of granting the motion, Defendant states:
+
+- 1. Defendant's response to the Motion is due on or about April 6, 2009, and an extension of time was given to April 13, 2009.
+- 2. Plaintiff's counsel also represents five (5) other Plaintiffs pursuing claims against Defendant, EPSTEIN, most of which have filed similar Motions. In order to fully and
+
+Jane Doe No. 3 v. Epstein Page 2
+
+adequately respond to this and the other motions, Defendant is in need of an extension until April 24, 2009.
+
+3. In addition to the multiple motions, good cause for the extension also includes that counsel has been attempting to resolve discovery issues in this and other cases against Defendant, EPSTEIN; an associate of Defendant's undersigned counsel who works extensively on this case is currently out of the office and the undersigned was working on and has filed between 12-15 motions and responses in the various cases during the time these motions were filed.
+
+4. The requested extension is fair and reasonable under the circumstances as it will provide time to allow the Defendant, EPSTEIN, to fully and adequately respond to this and the other motions. In addition, this action is still at its early stages.
+
+5. As certified below, counsel for Defendant conferred with counsel for Plaintiff, and Plaintiffs counsel is in agreement with the requested extension.
+
+WHEREFORE, Defendant requests that this Court enter an order granting Defendant an extension until April 24, 2009, in which to respond to the Above Motion.
+
+## Local Rule 7.1 Statement
+
+Counsel for the movant conferred by telephone with counsel for the Plaintiff and Counsel for Plaintiff is in agreement with the reque d xtension until April 24, 2009 for Defendant to respond to the Motion.
+
+> B ROB CRITTON, JR., ESQ.
+
+Jane Doe No. 3 v. Epstein  
+Page 3
+
+**Certificate of Service**
+
+I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record identified on the following Service List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on this 16 day of April, 2009:
+
+Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq.  
+Adam D. Horowitz, Esq.  
+Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A.  
+18205 Biscayne Boulevard  
+Suite 2218  
+Miami, FL 33160  
+305-931-2200  
+Fax: 305-931-0877  
+[ssm@sexabuseattorney.com](mailto:ssm@sexabuseattorney.com)  
+[ahorowitz@sexabuseattorney.com](mailto:ahorowitz@sexabuseattorney.com)  
+*Counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe #3*
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger  
+Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.  
+250 Australian Avenue South  
+Suite 1400  
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012  
+561-659-8300  
+Fax: 561-835-8691  
+[jagesq@bellsouth.net](mailto:jagesq@bellsouth.net)  
+*Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein*
+
+![]()
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739771/EFTA02739771.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739771/EFTA02739771.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0a2bc499399dcd37a7ee7abe80cc483c85acb459
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739771/EFTA02739771.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,231 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739771.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 3,
+  "chars": 3703,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 4.43,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            195.3105926513672,
+            90.72
+          ],
+          [
+            400.7907409667969,
+            90.72
+          ],
+          [
+            400.7907409667969,
+            117.83612060546875
+          ],
+          [
+            195.3105926513672,
+            117.83612060546875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Defendant's Amended Motion For Extension Of Time In Which To Respond To \nPlaintiff's Motion For Protective Against Piecemeal Depositions Of Jane Doe. \nNo.3, Motion To Consolidate Cases For Purposes Of Discovery And Incorporated \nMemorandum Of Law",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            67.32000000000001,
+            311.85
+          ],
+          [
+            534.2760000000001,
+            311.85
+          ],
+          [
+            534.2760000000001,
+            366.93
+          ],
+          [
+            67.32000000000001,
+            366.93
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Local Rule 7.1 Statement",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            229.5,
+            527.3100000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            379.27142333984375,
+            527.3100000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            379.27142333984375,
+            543.5500183105469
+          ],
+          [
+            229.5,
+            543.5500183105469
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Certificate of Service",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            236.232,
+            114.20999999999998
+          ],
+          [
+            359.24399999999997,
+            114.20999999999998
+          ],
+          [
+            359.24399999999997,
+            127.17
+          ],
+          [
+            236.232,
+            127.17
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            231
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            50
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            11
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739771"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739774/EFTA02739774.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739774/EFTA02739774.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4caf5bb496ab41ed6d623c207777c4bd17fae728
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739774/EFTA02739774.md
@@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
+*Diac*
+
+**UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT  
+SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA**
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA- [REDACTED]
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+v. Plaintiff,
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+\_\_\_\_\_  
+Defendant.
+
+**PLAINTIFF JANE DOE 3'S ANSWERS TO DEFENDANT'S FIRST  
+INTERROGATORIES**
+
+Plaintiff, JANE DOE 3, by and through their undersigned counsel, and pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 33, hereby responds to Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S First Set of Interrogatories to Plaintiff as follows:
+
+**General Objections**
+
+1. Plaintiff objects to Defendant's Interrogatories to the extent that the Interrogatories call for the disclosure of information protected by the attorney-client privilege, attorney work-product doctrine, or other applicable privilege or immunity, whether created by statute or common law. Plaintiff claims such privileges and protections to the extent implicated by each Interrogatory, and excludes privileged and protected information from any responses to Defendant's discovery. Any disclosure is inadvertent and is not intended to waive those privileges or protections, which are specifically reserved.
+
+2. Plaintiff objects to Defendant's Interrogatories to the extent that same are vague, ambiguous, incomprehensible and/or overly broad.
+
+**"A"**
+
+*CC: JANE, DI*
+
+Doe No. 3 v. Epstein
+
+Page 6
+
+Palm Beach, FL
+
+- 4. Have you ever been convicted of a crime, other than any juvenile adjudication, which under the law under which you were convicted was punishable by death or imprisonment in excess of 1 year, or that involved dishonesty or a false statement regardless of the punishment? If so, state as to each conviction the specific crime and the date and place of conviction.
+
+Answer:
+
+No.
+
+- 5. Please provide the name, address, telephone number, place of employment and job title of any person who has, claims to have or whom you believe may have knowledge or information pertaining to any fact alleged in the pleadings (as defined in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7(a) filed in this action, or any fact underlying the subject matter of this action.
+
+Answer:
+
+Plaintiff
+
+Other victims making similar allegations of sexual misconduct against Defendant Epstein who have brought civil claims against Epstein in Florida State and Federal courts.
+
+Defendant
+
+a Defendant's assistant
+
+Unknown staff members of Defendant, including the chef/Mt gardener, and maid
+
+Accompanied Plaintiff to Defendant's estate on at least one occasion
+
+Accompanied Plaintiff to Defendant's estate on at least one occasion
+
+1/IIIIIIIIPItaintiff to Defendant's estate on at least one occasion
+
+Accompanied Plaintiff to Defendant's estate on at least one occasion
+
+Doe No. 3 v. Epstein  
+Page 7
+
+[REDACTED] 9
+
+Plaintiff has seen Dr. [REDACTED] for therapy since Jan. 2008.
+
+[REDACTED] n
+
+Plaintiff has seen Dr. [REDACTED] for medication management since Nov. 2007.
+
+[REDACTED] er  
+[REDACTED] 4  
+who treated Plaintiff from Aug. 2007-Dec. 2007.
+
+Discovery is ongoing and will be supplemented in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
+
+6. Please state the specific nature and substance of the knowledge that you believe the person(s) identified in your response to interrogatory no. 5 may have.
+
+**Answer:**
+
+See Plaintiff's Answer to Interrogatory No. 5.
+
+7. Were you suffering from physical infirmity, disability, disease, sickness, or psychiatric/psychological condition at the time of the incident(s) described in the complaint? If so, what was the nature of the infirmity, disability, or sickness?
+
+**Answer:**
+
+[REDACTED]  
+[REDACTED]
+
+8. Did you consume any alcoholic beverages or take any drugs or medications within 12 hours before the time of each incident(s) described in the complaint? If so, state the type and amount of alcoholic beverages, drugs, or medication which were consumed, and when and where you consumed them.
+
+**Answer:**
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739774/EFTA02739774.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739774/EFTA02739774.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..444dcdbd7ea1f542dbe99152d4e42d38c3e60122
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739774/EFTA02739774.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,204 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739774.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 3,
+  "chars": 3858,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 6.45,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            195.84,
+            76.94999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            400.86,
+            76.94999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            400.86,
+            105.30000000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            195.84,
+            105.30000000000001
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "PLAINTIFF JANE DOE 3'S ANSWERS TO DEFENDANT'S FIRST INTERROGATORIES",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            116.28,
+            295.65
+          ],
+          [
+            483.48,
+            295.65
+          ],
+          [
+            483.48,
+            328.05
+          ],
+          [
+            116.28,
+            328.05
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "General Objections",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            241.74,
+            417.15000000000003
+          ],
+          [
+            358.02,
+            417.15000000000003
+          ],
+          [
+            358.02,
+            433.35
+          ],
+          [
+            241.74,
+            433.35
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            22
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            64
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            30
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            15
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            61
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            24
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739774"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739777/EFTA02739777.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739777/EFTA02739777.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9181b61d1225f23f2636a608e81df73eb1e1c4ea
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739777/EFTA02739777.md
@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
+#### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA-Ma
+
+JANE DOE NO.3,
+
+Plaintiff, v.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant. /
+
+### DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AGAINST PIECEMEAL DEPOSITIONS OF JANE DOE NO.3, MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE CASES FOR PURPOSES OF DISCOVERY, AND INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT
+
+Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, by and through his undersigned counsel, serves his Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Protective Order Against Piecemeal Depositions of Jane Doe No.3, Motion to Consolidate Cases for Purposes of Discovery, and Incorporated Memorandum of Law (hereinafter, the Motion"), with incorporated memorandum of law. In support, Defendant states:
+
+### I. RESPONSE WITH INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW AS TO DEPOSITION OF JANE DOE. NO.3 AND MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE
+
+#### a. The Depositions
+
+Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 3, filed this federal lawsuit against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein. In other separate matters, Plaintiffs, Jane Does, Nos. 2, 4-7, filed their own separate lawsuits against Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein. Plaintiff's counsel represents all Jane Does in cases Jane Doe Nos. <sup>2</sup> through 7 before this court.
+
+Plaintiff, Jane Doe. No. 3, served answers to interrogatories wherein she lists certain witness that may have knowledge regarding the facts and allegations alleged in her complaint including, but not limited to, Jane Doe No. 2. See Exhibit "A", Answer to Interrogatories, No. 5, in redacted form. An unredacted copy of the responses will be provided to the court upon the court's request and/or in camera. In particular, the response to interrogatory number 5 states that Jane Doe numbers 2 and 3 accompanied each other to Defendant's estate. Plaintiff admits this much in her Motion. Defendant seeks to take the deposition of Jane Doe. No. 3 as a witness in that matter (or any other matter she has knowledge of) and as a party in her own case, which she is an unidentified Plaintiff traveling under Jane Doe. No. 3.
+
+In an attempt to resolve this matter by letter correspondence, Defendant agreed and offered only to take the deposition of Jane Doe. No. 3 as a witness in all Jane Doe 2-7 cases only one time and separately one time as a Party Plaintiff in this matter in which Jane Doe No. 3 filed against Jeffrey Epstein. While this is a reasonable compromise in that Defendant has agreed not to take her deposition three (3) times as Plaintiff suspected, Plaintiff's counsel refused to agree. Plaintiff cannot file a lawsuit and then expect this court to protect her from being deposed as a party for the time period proscribed under the federal rules while at the same time asking this court to limit or prevent her deposition testimony as a witness in the instant matter or other Jane Doe matters where she has been identified as a witness.
+
+It is well settled that a Defendant may take the deposition of a party and/or a witness before trial. Rule 26, Fed.R.Civ. P., Rule 30, Fed.R. Civ.,P. and Leve v. General Motors Corp., 43 F.R.D. 508 (S.D.N.Y. 2967). Jane Doe. Nos. 2-7 commenced separate civil actions upon the filing of same against Jeffrey Epstein. Therefore, Defendant is entitled to depose Jane Doe Nos. 2 -7 in their own cases at least one time for the proscribed time periods and then as a witness in the instant matter or any matter they have knowledge of as reflected in the interrogatory responses or the pleadings. Therefore, Defendant has a right to depose each party-plaintiff separately and then as <sup>a</sup>witness at least once. Deposing Jane Doe No. 3 as <sup>a</sup>witness in the companion matters is necessary as that deposition will be tailored toward facts known by Jane Doe. No. 3 as those facts pertain to Jane Doe. Nos. 2, 4-7 claims in their complaints as oppose<sup>d</sup> to the facts alleged by Jane Doe. No. 3 in this individual action.
+
+Plaintiff's attorneys claim that sitting for more than one deposition will be traumatizing does not modify the rules and/or the law with regard to the right to take party and witness depositions. Plaintiff offers no expert medical or psychological support, by an affidavit of an expert or the Plaintiff herself, to support her position. In almost all instances, none of the Plaintiffs sought or received any psychological counseling until the concept of alawsuit and money was introduced. A party may, by oral questions take the deposition of any person, without leave of court. Rule 30, Fed.R. Civ.,P. Conducting these depositions separately will allow for the proper preparation as to each deponent's knowledge as that knowledge pertains to the specific case at hand (i.e., whether the deponent is awitness and/or a party plaintiff). Again, Defendant is willing to conduct one (1) deposition in connection with each matter before this court wherein a party to one matter is listed as <sup>a</sup>"witness" in another. That is, if Jane Doe No. <sup>3</sup> has knowledge as <sup>a</sup>witness to one or more matters, one "witness" deposition will be held. However, Defendant is also permitted to separately take a party-plaintiff deposition of any party<sup>p</sup>laintiff that happens to be awitness of and/or have knowledge of any other party-plaintiff's deposition. As such, only two depositions will occur.
+
+There is no legal basis supporting Plaintiffs proposition that Defendant not be allowed to take the deposition of Jane Doe. No. 3 as <sup>a</sup>witness in the other matters and as <sup>a</sup>party-plaintiff in
+
+Jane Doe. No.3's separately filed action. In fact, Plaintiff's theory flies in the face of the Federal Rules. Despite Plaintiff's contention, Defendant is not attempting to depose or call a witness for a second deposition without leave of court. Quite the opposite, Plaintiff is simply doing what the rules allow for — the taking of a deposition of a party and a witness.
+
+# b. Consolidation For Discovery Is Not Practical
+
+Next, if this case is consolidated for discovery purposes and depositions are limited only to one (1) deposition for a party plaintiff and for a witness that happens to be a party plaintiff in another matter, then confusion will result and motions in limine will undoubtedly be filed at a later date preventing the use of certain testimony at particular hearings and ultimately at trial. Further, since there remain separate party-plaintiffs, admissions or answers to discovery by one party, arguably, cannot be used by the Defendant in a consolidated discovery matter against another party-plaintiff. As such, consolidation in the instant matter is not warranted in that not all common issues of fact are present and the parties are not identical. Kelly v. Kelly, 911 F.Supp. 66 (N.D. NY 1996)(consolidation refused because it would only serve purpose of convenience of some witnesses, actions did not share all witnesses and parties were not identical); Borough of Olvphant v. PPL Corporation et al., 153 Fed.Appx. 80, 2005 WL 2673489 (C.A.3 (P.A.)); Motor Credit Company v. Chiorazzo, 529 F.Supp.2d 535 (D. N.J. 2008).
+
+Under Florida Rules of Civil Procedure 42, the decision to consolidate cases for discovery is not mandatory but that decision remains within the sound discretion of the court. In this instance, various Jane Does seek to consolidate the cases for discovery purposes. Very clearly, the facts and circumstances, as pled and as is reflected in answers to interrogatories, are different for each individual, i.e. the dates, the ages, the events, their experiences, witnesses, medical and/or psychological treatment, etc. Each of the Plaintiffs alleged incident history and post
+
+incident history and background is unique to those individuals. While the Jane Doe Plaintiffs may wish to serve a "standard" set of interrogatories, request for production, or any other type of discovery, the Defendant's discovery to the individual Plaintiffs, and certainly their responses, is unique to that individual. There will be multiple instances where the discovery is applicable only to a specific Jane Doe and not all, such as, physicians, psychologists, parents, siblings, friends, employers, teachers, individuals with whom the Plaintiff has had relationships — many of these depositions will go to damage related issues wherein the Plaintiffs seek millions of dollars in the form of compensation.
+
+There are some instances where the deposition of a particular individual may be applicable to all cases, and defense counsel will suggest, as he did in correspondence directed to Plaintiff's counsel that that particular deposition be used in all cases. However, in a vast majority of the instances where discovery, deposition and/or paper discovery is being utilized, including subpoena which will be sent to many different sources for each of the six Jane Does, consolidation serves no purpose.
+
+Even if this court consolidated the matters requested by Plaintiff, the undersigned would still be entitled to additional time to depose any party-plaintiff that is also listed or who has knowledge of any aspect of any other party-plaintiff's claim against Jeffrey Epstein. In addition, this Court has before it each of the cases filed by certain Plaintiffs against Jeffrey Epstein. Therefore, there is no chance of "conflicting results" as to rulings made by the same court and the same judge. As such, no true need exists for consolidation. Under Fed.R.Civ.Pro. 42, consolidation for discovery is not required, but remains within the sound discretion of the court.
+
+# II. Conclusion
+
+In sum, if Jane Doe No. 3 has knowledge as a witness to one or more matters, one "witness" deposition will be held as to her witness knowledge. However, Defendant is also permitted to separately take Jane Doe. No. 3's deposition as a party-plaintiff.
+
+WHEREFORE, Defendant requests that this Court deny the Motion, enter an order allowing for the relief requested herein and for such other re f as this court deems just and proper.
+
+> By: ROBERT D. CR1 ON ., ESQ.
+
+# Certificate of Service
+
+I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel o ecord iden • led on following Service List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on this day of , 2009:
+
+Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A. 18205 Biscayne Boulevard Suite 2218 Miami, FL 33160 305-931-2200 Fax: 305-931-0877 ssm@sexabuseattomev.com ahorowitzQsexabuseattomey.com Counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe #3
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 561-659-8300 Fax: 561-835-8691 jagesq(abellsouth.net Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+![]()By: ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ.  
+Florida Bar No. 224162
+
+[rcrit@bclclaw.com](mailto:rcrit@bclclaw.com)
+
+MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ.
+
+Florida Bar #617296
+
+[mpike@bclclaw.com](mailto:mpike@bclclaw.com)
+
+BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN
+
+515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400
+
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+
+561/842-2820 Phone
+
+561/515-3148 Fax
+
+*(Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein)*
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739777/EFTA02739777.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739777/EFTA02739777.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..86a092d35da63034e875873e9a40be0066014086
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739777/EFTA02739777.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,428 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739777.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 7,
+  "chars": 11225,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 3.57,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            199.2760467529297,
+            75.33
+          ],
+          [
+            408.81600000000003,
+            75.33
+          ],
+          [
+            408.81600000000003,
+            102.06
+          ],
+          [
+            199.2760467529297,
+            102.06
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR \nPROTECTIVE ORDER AGAINST PIECEMEAL DEPOSITIONS OF \nJANE DOE NO.3, MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE CASES FOR PURPOSES \nOF DISCOVERY, AND INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN \nSUPPORT",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            107.1,
+            294.03
+          ],
+          [
+            507.9958801269531,
+            294.03
+          ],
+          [
+            507.9958801269531,
+            363.69
+          ],
+          [
+            107.1,
+            363.69
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "I. RESPONSE WITH INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW AS TO \nDEPOSITION OF JANE DOE. NO.3 AND MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            101.59200000000001,
+            515.16
+          ],
+          [
+            534.8879999999999,
+            515.16
+          ],
+          [
+            534.8879999999999,
+            543.51
+          ],
+          [
+            101.59200000000001,
+            543.51
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "a. The Depositions",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            260.1,
+            558.0899999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            359.24399999999997,
+            558.0899999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            359.24399999999997,
+            571.7077026367188
+          ],
+          [
+            260.1,
+            571.7077026367188
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "b. Consolidation For Discovery Is Not Practical",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            181.152,
+            184.68
+          ],
+          [
+            432.5547790527344,
+            184.68
+          ],
+          [
+            432.5547790527344,
+            202.4730224609375
+          ],
+          [
+            181.152,
+            202.4730224609375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "II. Conclusion",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            266.832,
+            102.06
+          ],
+          [
+            346.0322265625,
+            102.06
+          ],
+          [
+            346.0322265625,
+            117.7230224609375
+          ],
+          [
+            266.832,
+            117.7230224609375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Certificate of Service",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            268.668,
+            349.92
+          ],
+          [
+            383.33050537109375,
+            349.92
+          ],
+          [
+            383.33050537109375,
+            365.60302734375
+          ],
+          [
+            268.668,
+            365.60302734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            218
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            438
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            57
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            47
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            24
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            73
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            37
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739777"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739784/EFTA02739784.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739784/EFTA02739784.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..54b43b0ad9ffa53ed6d1db978d170709d3a2d69a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739784/EFTA02739784.md
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA=M
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 4, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 5, CASE NO.: 08-CV-8038I-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 6, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80994-MARRA,
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 7, CASE NO.: 08- 80993-CIV-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## ORDER
+
+Upon Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion for Enlargement to Time to File Memorandum in Opposition to Motions to Compel Plaintiffs to Respond to Defendant's First Request to Produce and First Set of Interrogatories, et al., and good cause being shown, it is hereby
+
+ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion is granted. Plaintiffs shall have an enlargement of time of until April 29, 2009, to respond to the Defendant's Motions to Compel, et al.
+
+DONE AND ORDERED in in Ft. Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida, this day of 2009.
+
+DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739784/EFTA02739784.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739784/EFTA02739784.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7f3c77553d729dbe956b5eeebec56b8799d34bed
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739784/EFTA02739784.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,147 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739784.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 2,
+  "chars": 1155,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.15,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            85.05
+          ],
+          [
+            405.95098876953125,
+            85.05
+          ],
+          [
+            405.95098876953125,
+            115.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            115.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "ORDER",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            280.908,
+            379.89
+          ],
+          [
+            330.7633361816406,
+            379.89
+          ],
+          [
+            330.7633361816406,
+            394.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            280.908,
+            394.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            49
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            22
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            39
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            20
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739784"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739786/EFTA02739786.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739786/EFTA02739786.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4af5fe7f5d39983e5a061f62c151ad36337ff053
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739786/EFTA02739786.md
@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+/
+
+JANE DOE NO. 4, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MAR
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 5, CASE NO.: 08-CV-8038I-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 6, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80994-MARRA/JOHNSON
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 7. CASE NO.: 08- 80993-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## PLAINTIFFS' UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO FILE MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO MOTIONS TO COMPEL PLAINTIFFS TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S FIRST REQUEST TO PRODUCE AND FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES, ET AL.
+
+Plaintiffs, JANE DOES 2-7, by and through undersigned counsel, file this Motion for Enlargement to Time to File Memorandum in Opposition to Motions to Compel Plaintiffs to Respond to Defendant's First Request to Produce and First Set of Interrogatories, et al., pursuant to S.D. Fla.L.R. 7.1 and Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(b), and state as follows:
+
+I. On April 2, 2009, Defendant Epstein filed two Motions to Compel in each of the above-captioned cases: (1) Motion to Compel Plaintiff to Respond to Defendant's First Request to Produce and to Overrule Objections, and for an Award of Defendant's Reasonable Expenses; and (2) Motion to Compel Plaintiff to Answer Defendant's First Set of Interrogatories, and to Overrule Objections, and for an Award of Defendant's Reasonable Expenses. Plaintiffs' responses to these
+
+Motions are due on April 20, 2009.
+
+2. Plaintiffs move for an enlargement of time to prepare and file their response to the Motions because of demands on Plaintiffs' counsel in this case and in other cases and matters. This includes an initial appellate brief presently due on April 24, 2009, in Doe v. School Bd. of Broward County and Scavella, case no. 09 -10394-E, Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals.
+
+3. Plaintiffs request an enlargement of time until April 29, 2009.
+
+4. Pursuant to S.D.Fla.L.R. 7.1(A), Plaintiffs' counsel has conferred with counsel for Defendant regarding the relief sought in this Motion, who has advised Plaintiffs' counsel that Defendant has no objection to the enlargement of time requested.
+
+WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully request an enlargement of time to file their response to the Motions to Compel et al., until and including April 29, 2009.
+
+Dated: April 17, 2009
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+By: s/ Stuart S. Mermelstein Stuart S. Mermelstein (FL Bar No. 947245) ssm@sexabuseattorney.com Adam D. Horowitz (FL Bar No. 376980) ahorowitz@sexabuseattomey.com MERMELSTEIN & HOROWITZ, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiffs 18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160 Tel: 305-931-2200 Fax: 305-931-0877
+
+## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
+
+I hereby certify that on April 17, 2009,1 electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day to all parties on the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those parties who are not authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing.
+
+/s/ Stuart S. Mermelstein
+
+## SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. izoldberger@agwpa.com
+
+Robert D. Critton, Esq. reritton@bc1claw.com
+
+/s/ Stuart S. Mermelstein
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739786/EFTA02739786.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739786/EFTA02739786.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..35fdb5d5c051c28c19719e9d01c9b90b2b8e68f7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739786/EFTA02739786.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,303 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739786.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 5,
+  "chars": 3631,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.3,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            85.05
+          ],
+          [
+            406.76995849609375,
+            85.05
+          ],
+          [
+            406.76995849609375,
+            115.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            115.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "PLAINTIFFS' UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME \nTO FILE MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO MOTIONS TO COMPEL \nPLAINTIFFS TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S FIRST REQUEST \nTO PRODUCE AND FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES, ET AL.",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            104.652,
+            408.24
+          ],
+          [
+            508.1982116699219,
+            408.24
+          ],
+          [
+            508.1982116699219,
+            464.9830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            104.652,
+            464.9830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            227.66400000000002,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            386.50201416015625,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            386.50201416015625,
+            100.863037109375
+          ],
+          [
+            227.66400000000002,
+            100.863037109375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "SERVICE LIST \nDOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN \nUnited States District Court, Southern District of Florida",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            156.67200000000003,
+            85.05
+          ],
+          [
+            455.16455078125,
+            85.05
+          ],
+          [
+            455.16455078125,
+            129.7330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            156.67200000000003,
+            129.7330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            21
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            55
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            19
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            21
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            11
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739786"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739791/EFTA02739791.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739791/EFTA02739791.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..14646c5e99847d67993908e8a79f74603be082bf
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739791/EFTA02739791.md
@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
+#### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA/JOHNSON
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant. I
+
+#### REPLY MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO COMPEL ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES AND PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS
+
+Plaintiff, by and through undersigned counsel, files this Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion to Compel Answers to Interrogatories and Production of Documents, as follows:
+
+## I. Introduction
+
+Defendant relies upon generalizations regarding the nature of the case and the allegations in the pleadings in justifying his assertion of the Fifth Amendment privilege in response to each and every interrogatory and document request propounded by Plaintiffs. This blanket assertion of the privilege is insufficient to deny Plaintiffs all discovery in these cases. Defendant otherwise fails to set forth any basis for denying Plaintiffs any and all answers to its written discovery under the psychotherapist-patient privilege, the Federal Rules of Evidence, on grounds of relevance, third party privacy rights, or other grounds. Accordingly, Plaintiffs respectfully request an Order compelling answers to interrogatories and production of documents.
+
+## II. Argument in Reply
+
+### A. Defendant Has Made a Blanket Assertion of the Privilege Against Self-Incrimination That Is Insufficient
+
+### 1. Defendant Cannot Rely on its Blanket Objections to Interrogatories on Fifth Amendment Grounds
+
+Defendant Epstein insists that he has not asserted a "blanket privilege" to discovery under the Fifth Amendment, even though he has repeated the identical objection to each of Plaintiff's discovery request on this ground. The federal courts have noted that "[t]he term 'blanket assertion' is not limited to the situation where the defendant makes a single response to numerous questions." United States v. Buaiz 2008 WL 5050102 (E.D. Tenn. 2008). Rather, as here, where the defendant refuses to answer on fifth amendment grounds each and every question, such repeated assertions are fairly characterized as a "blanket assertion". Id.; Capitol Products Corp. v. Herron, 457 F.2d 541 (8th Cir. 1972).
+
+Accordingly, it is not sufficient to support the invocation of the Fifth Amendment with nothing more than sweeping generalizations applicable to all questions that were asked in discovery. See United States v. Pierce, 561 F.2d 735 (9th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 923 (1978) ("a blanket refusal to answer any question is unacceptable").
+
+Defendant Epstein's Response does not set forth reasonable cause for a concern of selfincrimination in response to specific interrogatories. It is particularly deficient with regard to interrogatory, nos. 1-2 (identity of employees who worked or came to Palm Beach residence), no. 7 (Defendant's presence in Florida), no. 8 (identity of health care providers), no. 9 (persons providing transport services), no. 11 (Epstein's telephone numbers) and no. 12 (employees' telephone numbers). Epstein's references to allegations of sexual abuse, exploitation and battery in the Complaints in this and other civil actions against him, along with the alleged plan and scheme of recruiting girls to come to Epstein's Palm Beach mansion to give him "massages", fall well short of demonstrating that any interrogatory asked of Epstein that is relevant and within the broad scope of Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(b)(1) would realistically and necessarily furnish a link in the chain of evidence needed to prove a crime against him.
+
+Epstein alternatively points out that there is a "narrow exception" which allows a blanket assertion of the privilege where the trial court determines it to be legitimate based on the court's knowledge of the case and the expected testimony. United States v. Goodwin 625 F.2d 693, 701 (5th Cir. 1980); United States v. Tsui 646 F.2d 365 (9th Cir. 1981). This is not a case, however, where this narrow exception should apply. In Tsui, the Court allowed a blanket assertion of the privilege only because it was clear that the witness would only be questioned about the real estate transactions that were at the heart of his criminal liability concerns, and the proponent of the testimony argued only that the witness did not have a reasonable fear of prosecution. Id. at 368. Such unusual circumstances are not present in the instant cases. Because a blanket assertion of the Fifth Amendment privilege is not legitimate in these cases, the Court must make a "particularized inquiry", and "only as to genuinely threatening questions should [the witness's] silence be sustained." Goodwin, 625 F.2d at 701 (quoting United States v. Melchor Moreno, 536 F.2d 1042, 1049 (5th Cir. 1976)).
+
+Defendant further asserts that Plaintiff's interrogatories requesting that he identify employees may lead to evidence tending to incriminate him because one of his employees, is identified in the Complaint. (Defendant Memorandum (DE 56), p. 18). This does not, however, support a blanket refusal to answer on Fifth Amendment grounds. It does not demonstrate how answers to these interrogatories, seeking the identities of all employees who were assigned or came to the Palm Beach residence, could realistically furnish a link in the chain of evidence needed to prosecute Epstein.
+
+Similarly, the allegations of the Complaints alone do not reveal the danger of selfincrimination from answers to interrogatories seeking information on when Epstein was in the State of Florida, who provided transportation services to Epstein, his telephone numbers, his employees' telephone numbers, and his health care providers.' Discovery requests that seek background information or information on events and experiences of the witness for which he cannot realistically or genuinely be expected to be charged with a crime are not subject to Fifth Amendment protection. Sse Krause v. 390 F.Supp 1070, 1071-72 (N.D. Ohio 1974) (allowing questions to be asked regarding personal backgrounds and experiences excluding the event at issue in the pending criminal indictment).
+
+### 2. Defendant Has Not Demonstrated That the Act of Producing Documents in Response to Specific Requests Would be Sufficiently Testimonial and Incriminating
+
+Defendant Epstein makes a general assertion that a response to any of Plaintiff's document requests would entail testimonial self-incrimination. (Defendant's Response (DE 56), pp. 22-23). Whether the act of producing a particular document would be sufficiently testimonial and incriminatory to support the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination is a "fact dependent inquiry." United States v. Wujkowski 929 F.2d 981, 985 (4th Cir. 1991). It is the burden of the party asserting the privilege to "explain how the act of producing documents would pose a real danger of incrimination." Bear Stems & Co. v. Wyler, 182 F.Supp. 2d 679, 681 (N.D. Ill. 2002).
+
+Defendant's reliance on United States v. Hubbell 530 U.S. 27 (2000), is inadequate. In Hubbell it was apparent from the breadth of the description of documents demanded in the government's subpoena that "the prosecutor needed respondent's assistance both to identify
+
+<sup>&#</sup>x27; See Interrogatory nos. 7, 8, 10, 11, 12.
+
+potential sources of information and to produce those sources." Id. at 41. In Bear Sterns, the Court explained that the facts of Hubbell were unique and do not support a blanket, all-encompassing assertion by a witness or party that the production of documents would be testimonial and incriminating:
+
+> To begin with, in Hubei!, the incriminatory nature of the production of the document sought was obvious. The respondent was already incarcerated as a result of one investigation and he was the target of a second. Indeed, the second investigation was directed at whether the respondent was in compliance with a plea agreement-resulting from the first investigation-requiring him to produce information relating to the Whitewater investigation. If the respondent had produced such information in response to the subpoena, it would have constituted testimony that he had Whitewater information that he had not provided-it would be an admission that he failed to comply with the plea agreement. Accordingly, it was the testimonial aspect of the production that concerned the Court in Hubbell, 530 U.S. at 36-44 120 S.Ct. at 2043-48. At the appellate court level, the court specifically found that respondent's acknowledgment of the existence of certain records sought in the government's subpoena would be directly incriminating. Hubbell, 167 F.3d at 582.
+
+Id. at 683.
+
+As noted by the Court in Bear Stems, a determination that the production of documents would be testimonial cannot be premised on the witness's say so:
+
+> A witness is not exonerated from answering merely because he declares that in so doing he would incriminate himself; his assertion does not of itself establish the hazard of incrimination.
+
+Id. at 684. In Bear Sterns the Court found that the defendant failed to meet his burden in asserting the privilege against self-incrimination in response to a request for production that included wire transfer records, telephone records, bank records, and records pertaining to specific investment firms. Id. Plaintiffs seek in their document requests, among other things, telephone records, travel records, correspondence and communications, and personal calendars and diaries. The act of producing such records is not a crime. See id. ("[a]s the plaintiff notes, it is not a crime to make a
+
+wire transfer, use the phone, or possess corporate records"). Defendant Epstein has failed to meet his burden of demonstrating that the document requests made by Plaintiffs in these cases would pose a real danger of incrimination. As in Bear Stems the Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Production of Documents should accordingly be granted.
+
+### B. Defendant Epstein Fails to Demonstrate Why His Invocation of the Fifth Amendment Would Not Warrant an Adverse Interest In These Civil Cases
+
+Defendant Epstein does not dispute the general rule that an adverse inference may be drawn in a civil case from a defendant's refusal to testify or respond to discovery by invoking the privilege against self incrimination. Baxter v. Palmigiano 425 U.S. 308, 318-20 (1976). He instead asserts that there is a "recognized exception" that applies in a case where the adverse inference is the sole basis for the plaintiff's prima facie case or will cause the automatic entry of summary judgment. (Defendant's Response, (DE 56), pp. 14-15); Federal Trade Comm'n v. Transnet Wireless Corp., 506 F.Supp. 2d 1247, 1252 n. 4 (S.D. Ha. 2007). This exception plainly would not apply hem. There are witnesses other than Defendant to the acts and conduct alleged in these cases, including Plaintiffs and other victims. See Transnet Wireless, 506 F.Supp. 2d at 1252 n. 4 (holding that the Court "will draw adverse inferences where appropriate" in reviewing a motion for summary judgment, "in light of the myriad evidence presented by plaintiff').
+
+In any event, it would be premature at this stage of the case for the Court to foreclose the use of an adverse inference from the Defendant's invocation of the privilege against self-incrimination. This issue would arise either in a motion for summary judgment or a motion in limine. Accordingly, based on the foregoing, Defendant's self-serving assertion in his discovery responses concerning the drawing of an adverse inference is improper, and should be rejected and stricken.
+
+### C. Plaintiff Is Entitled to Discovery of Health Care Information Requested In Interrogatory No. 8
+
+Defendant Epstein argues that Plaintiff's Interrogatory no. 8 is overbroad because it seeks information over a ten year period. As to Defendant Epstein's psychological condition, particularly any problem of a sexual nature, ten years is more than reasonable. My psychosexual condition has likely existed for most or all of Defendant Epstein's adult life.
+
+Defendant Epstein next asserts Florida's psychotherapist-patient privilege under Florida Statute §90.503(2). As set forth in Plaintiff's Motion, the allegations of child sexual abuse in this case bring into play the exception to the psychotherapist-patient privilege of Florida Statute §39.204. Defendant asserts that this Court is required to hold an in camera inspection of documents to determine, as to each document, whether Florida Statute §39.204 is applicable. See Doherty v. John Doe No. 22, 957 So.2d 1267 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007). Plaintiff agrees that such an in camera inspection would be appropriate to evaluate whether the documents relate to allegations of child sexual abuse. In this regard, any notes or records relating to Epstein's sexual interests or tendencies produced in an in camera inspection would be relevant and should be turned over to Plaintiff as falling within the exception of §39.204.
+
+### D. Third Party Privacy Rights Are Not a Basis to Deny Discovery
+
+The right to privacy discussed in Eisenstadt v. Baird, 405 U.S. 438, 454 (1972), has nothing to do with the discovery issues in this case. Eisenstadt concerns the distribution of a contraceptive device. Yet Defendant relies entirely on Eisenstadt in contending that third party privacy rights provide a basis for Defendant to object to discovery in this case. The vague argument and unsupported assertion raised by Defendant in this case, "that the privacy rights of third parties are implicated", is frivolous and must be rejected.
+
+### E. Plaintiff Is Entitled In Discovery to Documents Relating to Plea Agreements and Criminal Proceedings
+
+Defendant asserts that Plaintiff should not be entitled to receive any documents responsive to her Request nos. 1-4 for the sole reason that these documents would not themselves be admissible under Fed.R.Evid. 408 and 410. It is well established that broad discovery under Fed.R.Civ.P. 26 should not, without more, be limited on the basis of admissibility at trial. ao\_Fed.R.Civ.P. 26 (1946 Advisory Committee Note). (Rule 26(b) "may cover not only evidence for use at the trial but also inquiry into matters in themselves inadmissible as evidence but which will lead to the discovery of such evidence. The purpose of discovery is to allow a broad search for facts, the names of witnesses, or any other matters which may aid a party in the preparation or presentation of his case"). Accordingly, the fact alone that plea agreements and related documents may not be admissible at trial is not a basis to deny their production in discovery.2 In Cupac, Inc. v. Mid-West Agency. Inc., 100 F.R.D. 440 (S.D. Ohio 1983), the Court held on these grounds that a party could obtain discovery relating to a criminal plea, including the answers to questions asked by the prosecutor, even though this information would be inadmissible under Fed.R.Evid. 410. Any concerns regarding the disclosure of documents responsive to request nos. 1-4 could be addressed in an appropriate protective order. Plaintiffs and their counsel, however, should have these documents in discovery.
+
+### F. An In Camera Hearing May Be Appropriate To Determine Whether Defendant Properly Claims Privilege In Response To Interrogatories And Document Reuuests
+
+Given the fact intensive nature of the inquiry into whether a defendant has met his burden in asserting a privilege against self-incrimination, some courts have conducted in camera, ex pane hearings to determine whether assertions of the privilege are valid in each instance. See United
+
+<sup>&#</sup>x27;Plaintiff further notes that her document request no. 4 seeks documents obtained in discovery and investigation of the criminal cases, not documents pertaining to the plea agreement. Accordingly, Rules 408 and 410 could not serve as a basis to object to these requests.</p><p block-type='Text'>States v. Duncan 704 F.Supp 820 (N.D. 111. 1989); see also United States v. Wujkowski 929 F.2d 981, 986 (4th Cir. 1991) (&quot;[w]e hold only that the district court must undertake a more careful examination of the documents in question and provide a basis for its findings&quot;). To the extent that this Court is in doubt as to whether to uphold the Defendant&#x27;s privilege claim as to any particular document request or interrogatory, then an in camera hearing would be appropriate.</p><h1>III. Conclusion</h1><p block-type='Text'>Based on the foregoing, and for the reasons stated in Plaintiffs&#x27; Motion to Compel Answers to Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents and Incorporated Memorandum of Law, Plaintiff requests that Defendant Epstein be ordered to answer interrogatories and produce responsive documents.</p><p block-type='Text'></p><p block-type='Text'>Dated: April 20, 2009 Respectfully submitted,</p><p block-type='Text'>By: s/ Stuart S. Mennelstein Stuart S. Mermelstein (FL Bar No. 947245) ssm@sexabuseattorney.com Adam D. Horowitz (FL Bar No. 376980) ahorowitz@sexabuseattomey.com MERMELSTEIN &amp; HOROWITZ, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiff 18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160 Tel: 305-931-2200 Fax: 305-931-0877</p><h4>CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE</h4><p block-type='Text'>I hereby certify that on April 202009, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day to all parties on the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those parties who are not authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing.</p><p block-type='Text'>s/ Smart S. Mermelstein</p><h3>SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida</h3><p block-type='Text'>Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. jgoldberger@agwpa.com</p><p block-type='Text'>Robert D. Critton, Esq. rcritton@bciclaw.com</p><p block-type='Text'>s/ Stuart S. Mermelstein</p>
+ </body>
+</html></sup>
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739791/EFTA02739791.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739791/EFTA02739791.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1e7ef62942d2d12976494f84436254670204a16e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739791/EFTA02739791.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,788 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739791.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 11,
+  "chars": 17988,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.32,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            72.08999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            405.95098876953125,
+            72.08999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            405.95098876953125,
+            100.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            100.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "REPLY MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO COMPEL \nANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES AND PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            95.47200000000001,
+            281.88
+          ],
+          [
+            517.73095703125,
+            281.88
+          ],
+          [
+            517.73095703125,
+            310.4830627441406
+          ],
+          [
+            95.47200000000001,
+            310.4830627441406
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "I. Introduction",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            252.75599999999997,
+            379.08000000000004
+          ],
+          [
+            359.6578674316406,
+            379.08000000000004
+          ],
+          [
+            359.6578674316406,
+            394.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            252.75599999999997,
+            394.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "II. Argument in Reply",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            235.62,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            375.96356201171875,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            375.96356201171875,
+            86.68353271484375
+          ],
+          [
+            235.62,
+            86.68353271484375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "A. Defendant Has Made a Blanket \nAssertion of the Privilege Against \nSelf-Incrimination That Is Insufficient",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            203.18400000000003,
+            98.82
+          ],
+          [
+            425.2178649902344,
+            98.82
+          ],
+          [
+            425.2178649902344,
+            142.18353271484375
+          ],
+          [
+            203.18400000000003,
+            142.18353271484375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "1. Defendant Cannot Rely on its Blanket Objections \nto Interrogatories on Fifth Amendment Grounds",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            68.544,
+            155.52
+          ],
+          [
+            364.19281005859375,
+            155.52
+          ],
+          [
+            364.19281005859375,
+            184.56353759765625
+          ],
+          [
+            68.544,
+            184.56353759765625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "2. Defendant Has Not Demonstrated That the Act of \nProducing Documents in Response to Specific Requests \nWould be Sufficiently Testimonial and Incriminating",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            68.544,
+            350.73
+          ],
+          [
+            393.7759094238281,
+            350.73
+          ],
+          [
+            393.7759094238281,
+            393.80352783203125
+          ],
+          [
+            68.544,
+            393.80352783203125
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "B. Defendant Epstein Fails to Demonstrate Why His \nInvocation of the Fifth Amendment Would Not \nWarrant an Adverse Interest In These Civil Cases",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            159.12,
+            183.06
+          ],
+          [
+            455.6430969238281,
+            183.06
+          ],
+          [
+            455.6430969238281,
+            226.56353759765625
+          ],
+          [
+            159.12,
+            226.56353759765625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "C. Plaintiff Is Entitled to Discovery of Health Care \nInformation Requested In Interrogatory No. 8",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            181.152,
+            686.0699999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            450.1328125,
+            686.0699999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            450.1328125,
+            716.3035202026367
+          ],
+          [
+            181.152,
+            716.3035202026367
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "D. Third Party Privacy Rights Are \nNot a Basis to Deny Discovery",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            203.18400000000003,
+            476.28
+          ],
+          [
+            408.57537841796875,
+            476.28
+          ],
+          [
+            408.57537841796875,
+            506.2330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            203.18400000000003,
+            506.2330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "E. Plaintiff Is Entitled In Discovery to Documents \nRelating to Plea Agreements and Criminal Proceedings",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            164.62800000000001,
+            686.0699999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            468.684814453125,
+            686.0699999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            468.684814453125,
+            715.8630142211914
+          ],
+          [
+            164.62800000000001,
+            715.8630142211914
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "F. An In Camera Hearing May Be Appropriate To Determine \nWhether Defendant Properly Claims Privilege In \nResponse To Interrogatories And Document Reuuests",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            134.64000000000001,
+            518.4000000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            477.5069580078125,
+            518.4000000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            477.5069580078125,
+            562.1030120849609
+          ],
+          [
+            134.64000000000001,
+            562.1030120849609
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "III. Conclusion",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            255.81599999999997,
+            210.60000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            355.80950927734375,
+            210.60000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            355.80950927734375,
+            226.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            255.81599999999997,
+            226.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 9,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            227.66400000000002,
+            72.08999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            386.52947998046875,
+            72.08999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            386.52947998046875,
+            85.863037109375
+          ],
+          [
+            227.66400000000002,
+            85.863037109375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "SERVICE LIST \nDOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN \nUnited States District Court, Southern District of Florida",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 10,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            156.06,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            455.1346740722656,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            455.1346740722656,
+            114.7330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            156.06,
+            114.7330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            49
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            67
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            60
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            58
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            83
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            35
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            64
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            66
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            62
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            57
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 9,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            19
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 10,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            19
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739791"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739802/EFTA02739802.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739802/EFTA02739802.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8d3f0c8444348c51f54747d835c3e7ded2e63901
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739802/EFTA02739802.md
@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRAM=
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+/
+
+JANE DOE NO. 4, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MAR
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 5, CASE NO.: 08-CV-8038I-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 6, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80994-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 7, CASE NO.: 08- 80993-CIV-MARRa
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+#### PLAINTIFFS' MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STAY AND OR CONTINUE ACTION
+
+Plaintiffs, JANE DOES 2-7, by and through undersigned counsel, file this Memorandum in Opposition to Stay and or Continue Action, as follows:
+
+## L Introduction
+
+In moving for stay, Defendant has the burden of demonstrating that, due to a parallel criminal proceeding, if he exercises his right against self incrimination he will certainly lose on summary judgment unless a stay is granted. Defendant has failed to satisfy this burden. There is no pending motion for summary judgment. There is also no criminal proceeding at this time arising from Epstein's acts against the Plaintiffs or other victims. Indeed, whether such a criminal proceeding is ever commenced is entirely within the Defendant's control, by complying with the terms of his Non-Prosecution Agreement with the U.S. Attorney's Office. Defendant relies upon an amorphous possible breach of his Non-Prosecution Agreement with the U.S. Attorney, which does not give rise to the "special circumstances" necessary to warrant a stay. Finally, even if there were grounds for a stay, it would not be appropriate in these cases because Plaintiffs would be severely prejudiced by the delay occasioned by a stay.
+
+# II. Argument
+
+#### A. Defendant Has Not Demonstrated that He Faces a Certain Loss on Summary Judgment If a Stay Is Not Granted
+
+The Constitution doe not require a stay of civil proceedings pending the outcome of criminal proceedings involving a common defendant. Shell Oil Co. v. Altina Associates. Inc. 866 F.Supp. 536, 540 (M.D. Fla. 1994). A stay pending resolution of related criminal proceedings is warranted only when the defendant demonstrates that " 'special circumstances' so require in the `interests of justice.' " United States v. Lot 5. Fox Grove 23 F.3d 359, 365 (11th Cir. 1994).
+
+In the Eleventh Circuit, the "special circumstances" which may support a stay are limited. The fact that the Defendant may "risk a non-criminal disadvantage by remaining silent for fear of self incrimination in a parallel criminal proceeding does not rise to the level of an unconstitutional infringement."2 Shell Oil 866 F.Supp. at 540. Accordingly, the Defendant's right to silence is not a basis to stay the civil case pending resolution of a criminal action. Id. There is one exception applicable where a stay would be necessary to prevent an unconstitutional infringement of the
+
+<sup>&#</sup>x27; Defendant Epstein filed an identical Motion to Stay in the case Jane Doe v. Epstein, case no. 08- CIV 80893 MAR1a. Plaintiffs concur in the arguments made by Jane Doe's counsel in that case in opposition to Defendant's Motion. (Case no. 08-CIV 80893, DE 31). The same reasoning and arguments apply in the instant cases. Plaintiffs in this Memorandum will attempt to stream line and limit its arguments to avoid unnecessary repetition and duplication with the response in Jane Doe.
+
+<sup>&#</sup>x27;In this regard, The Defendant&#x27;s silence by invoking the Fifth Amendment does not prohibit adverse inferences against him in the civil case. Shell Oil, 866 F.Supp. at 40.</p><p block-type='Text'>defendant&#x27;s right against self incrimination: &quot;[T]he law in the Eleventh Circuit requires consideration of whether, as a result of invoking the privilege, the defendant faces certain loss of the civil proceeding on summary judgment if the civil proceeding were to continue.&quot; In re Financial Federation Title &amp; Trust. Inc. 252 B.R. 834, 837 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2000)3 (citing United States v. Lot 5 23 F.3d at 364); accord Shell Oil 866 F.Supp. at 540 (noting that there is a &quot;recognized exception to this general rule: the Fifth Amendment is violated when a person, who is a defendant in both a civil and criminal case, is forced to choose between waiving his privilege against selfincrimination or losing the civil case in [summary proceedings]&quot;).</p><p block-type='Text'>The cases relied upon by Defendant are consistent with these authorities. In Ventura v. Broskv, 2006 WL 3392207 (S.D. Fla. 2006), the Court stated the rule that a stay is warranted to avoid a situation &quot;where a defendant in both criminal and civil proceedings must choose between whether to waive his privilege against self-incrimination or to lose the civil case in summary or default judgment proceedings.&quot; Id. at \*I. Moreover, the stay in Ventura was granted on motion of the defendant Miami-Dade County Police Department because it would be prejudiced by its codefendant, a former police officer, asserting the Fifth Amendment and refusing to answer &quot;in response to the civil Complaint and any discovery directed at him in the case.&quot; Id. Such concerns involving prejudice to a codefendant are not present here. In Securities and Exchange Comm&#x27; n v. Rehtorik 755 F.Supp. 1018 (S.D. Fla. 1990), another case relied upon by Defendant, the Court denied a stay of the case, and made clear in its holding that the defendant had not demonstrated that it would be subject to &quot;automatic liability&quot; on a motion for summary judgment:</p><p><sup>&#</sup>x27;The Court in Financial Federation Title &amp; Trust noted that the standard in the Eleventh Circuit is &quot;more narrow and less subjective&quot; than in other Circuits where a multi-factor test is used. Id. at 837.</p><p block-type='Text'>The defendants can exercise their Fifth Amendment rights in the face of the S.E.C.&#x27;s summary judgment motion by not presenting evidence which would implicate them in the alleged securities fraud. Though an adverse inference may be drawn due to their silence, the S.E.C. must still carry its burden of proving fraud committed by the defendants; their silence alone will not give rise to automatic liability.</p><p block-type='Text'>As such, the defendants would not be compelled to speak. To speak or not to speak becomes, in such a case, a question of strategy rather than one of unconstitutional compulsion.</p><p block-type='Text'>1.4. at 1020.</p><p block-type='Text'>Accordingly, the Defendant&#x27;s Motion to Stay is, at best, premature. Defendant Epstein fails to demonstrate that he is certain to lose on summary judgment if he exercises his constitutional right against self-incrimination. Indeed, there is no summary judgment motion pending. Defendant&#x27;s Motion to Stay must accordingly be denied.</p><h4>B. This Court Has Previously Made It Clear That a Stay is Not Warranted, and Circumstances Have Not Changed</h4><p block-type='Text'>Defendant previously moved for a mandatory stay pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3509(k). This Court denied that Motion on the grounds that there was no criminal action pending, a requirement for a stay under §3509(k). (DE 33). The Court in its Opinion also stated that a discretionary stay was not warranted:</p><blockquote><p block-type='Text'>The Court also does not believe a discretionary stay is warranted ... [T]he Court sees no reason to delay this litigation for the next thirtythree months. After all, Defendant is in control of his own destiny it is up to him (and him alone) whether the plea agreement reached with the State of Florida is breached. If Defendant does not breach the agreement, then he should have no concerns regarding his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. The fact that the U.S. Attorney (or other law enforcement officials) may object to some discovery in these civil cases is not, in an of itself, a reason to stay the civil action. Any such issues shall be resolved as they arise in the course of this litigation.</p></blockquote><p block-type='Text'>(Order Denying Motion to Stay, p. 4). In again seeking a stay, Defendant seized on the last sentence</p><p block-type='Text'>quoted above and takes it out of context in contending that the time is now ripe for a stay. The Court stated that issues arising in the event that the U.S. Attorney or other law enforcement officials object to discovery can be resolved during the course of the litigation. (DE 33, p. 4). The Court was not inviting the Defendant to file another motion for stay later in the course of discovery. In any event, there are no changed circumstances which would warrant a different analysis and conclusion from that reached by the Court last August.</p><h2>C. The Defendant Cannot Meet His Burden of Demonstrating Grounds for a Stay on the Basis of Vague Assertions of the Position of the USAO</h2><p block-type='Text'>There is no criminal prosecution pending for the acts of Epstein against any of the Plaintiffs in these civil cases. Epstein&#x27;s Motion thus fails at the outset because there is no parallel criminal action.4 In any event, the Defendant vaguely asserts, without supporting documentation, that the &quot;USAO has already attempted to claim violations of the Non-Prosecution Agreement.&quot; (Motion to Stay (DE 57), p. 2). The Defendant submits the Affidavit of his criminal attorney, Jack Goldberger, who asserts that &quot;the USAO has taken the position on a number of occasions that it might consider&quot; various actions by Epstein to be a breach of the Non-Prosecution Agreement. Nowhere does the Motion or this supporting Affidavit assert that the USAO has declared a breach of the Non-Prosecution Agreement, nor does it indicate that the issue of breach has been raised by either party in any court. It is therefore difficult to understand how this can be grounds for a stay. Defendant does nothing more than speculate on the intentions of the USAO. The Motion to Stay is therefore, at best, premature.</p><h1>D. Plaintiffs Would Be Prejudiced by a Stay</h1><p><sup>&#</sup>x27; The cases discussing the stay issues are premised on a pending criminal action parallel to the civil proceeding. See gag, Rehtorik, 755 F.Supp. at 1019-1020; United States v. Lot 5 23 F.3d at 364 (quoting United States v. Little Al 712 F.2d 133, 136 (5th Cir. 1983)).</p><p block-type='Text'>Because Defendant has failed to set forth circumstances that would support a stay, there is no need to proceed further. Nonetheless, Plaintiffs note that they will be severely prejudiced if a stay is granted. First, the stay requested is a lengthy one, to the end of 2010. Such a delay is simply unfair to the Plaintiffs, who are entitled to civil remedies for the wrongs that were committed by Epstein.</p><p block-type='Text'>Additionally, the delay in discovery will be prejudicial to Plaintiffs. Investigation and discovery will become more difficult with the passage of time. The bulk of the allegations occurred in 2004-05, when the Plaintiffs were minors. Plaintiffs should not have to wait to engage in discovery. Finally, the delay occasioned by a stay would prejudice these Plaintiffs vis-a-vis other victims of Epstein who brought their claims in state court and would not be stayed, particularly if these other victims recover punitive damage judgments against Epstein before Plaintiffs have even had an opportunity to litigate their claims.</p><h2>Conclusion</h2><p block-type='Text'>Based on the foregoing, Plaintiffs respectfully request that Defendant&#x27;s Motions to Stay and/or Continue Action be denied in their entirety.</p><p block-type='Text'></p><p block-type='Text'>Dated: April 23, 2009 Respectfully submitted,</p><p block-type='Text'>By: s/ Stuart S. Mermelstein Stuart S. Mermelstein (FL Bar No. 947245) ssm@sexabuseattorney.com Adam D. Horowitz (FL Bar No. 376980) ahorowitz@sexabuseattorney.com MERMELSTEIN &amp; HOROWITZ, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiffs 18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160 Tel: 305-931-2200 Fax: 305-931-0877</p><h2>CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE</h2><p block-type='Text'>I hereby certify that on April 23, 2009, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day to all parties on the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those parties who are not authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing.</p><p block-type='Text'>/s/ Stuart S. Mermelstein</p><h3>SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN United States District Court. Southern District of Florida</h3><p block-type='Text'>Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. inoldberger@agwpa.com</p><p block-type='Text'>Robert D. Critton, Esq. rcritton@bc1claw.com</p><p block-type='Text'>/s/ Stuart S. Mermelstein</p>
+ </body>
+</html></sup>
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739802/EFTA02739802.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739802/EFTA02739802.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6783874e09ff17505fd6bbb4e15758d8eae19a69
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739802/EFTA02739802.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,628 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739802.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 9,
+  "chars": 13135,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.87,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            85.05
+          ],
+          [
+            406.76995849609375,
+            85.05
+          ],
+          [
+            406.76995849609375,
+            115.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            115.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "PLAINTIFFS' MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION \nTO MOTION TO STAY AND OR CONTINUE ACTION",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            156.06,
+            393.65999999999997
+          ],
+          [
+            456.7173767089844,
+            393.65999999999997
+          ],
+          [
+            456.7173767089844,
+            422.60302734375
+          ],
+          [
+            156.06,
+            422.60302734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "L Introduction",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            252.144,
+            491.66999999999996
+          ],
+          [
+            359.68609619140625,
+            491.66999999999996
+          ],
+          [
+            359.68609619140625,
+            506.9830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            252.144,
+            506.9830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "II. Argument",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            258.876,
+            197.64
+          ],
+          [
+            353.5387878417969,
+            197.64
+          ],
+          [
+            353.5387878417969,
+            212.9830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            258.876,
+            212.9830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "A. Defendant Has Not Demonstrated that He Faces a Certain \nLoss on Summary Judgment If a Stay Is Not Granted",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            136.476,
+            225.99000000000004
+          ],
+          [
+            475.96673583984375,
+            225.99000000000004
+          ],
+          [
+            475.96673583984375,
+            254.9830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            136.476,
+            254.9830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "B. This Court Has Previously Made It Clear That a Stay is \nNot Warranted, and Circumstances Have Not Changed",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            141.372,
+            365.31000000000006
+          ],
+          [
+            469.9051513671875,
+            365.31000000000006
+          ],
+          [
+            469.9051513671875,
+            394.863037109375
+          ],
+          [
+            141.372,
+            394.863037109375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "C. The Defendant Cannot Meet His Burden of Demonstrating Grounds \nfor a Stay on the Basis of Vague Assertions of the Position of the USAO",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            111.384,
+            253.53000000000003
+          ],
+          [
+            509.4212951660156,
+            253.53000000000003
+          ],
+          [
+            509.4212951660156,
+            283.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            111.384,
+            283.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "D. Plaintiffs Would Be Prejudiced by a Stay",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            179.928,
+            630.99
+          ],
+          [
+            432.22454833984375,
+            630.99
+          ],
+          [
+            432.22454833984375,
+            646.4830169677734
+          ],
+          [
+            179.928,
+            646.4830169677734
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Conclusion",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            274.788,
+            393.65999999999997
+          ],
+          [
+            337.7822265625,
+            393.65999999999997
+          ],
+          [
+            337.7822265625,
+            408.7330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            274.788,
+            408.7330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            227.66400000000002,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            386.50201416015625,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            386.50201416015625,
+            100.863037109375
+          ],
+          [
+            227.66400000000002,
+            100.863037109375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "SERVICE LIST \nDOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN \nUnited States District Court. Southern District of Florida",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            156.67200000000003,
+            85.05
+          ],
+          [
+            455.16455078125,
+            85.05
+          ],
+          [
+            455.16455078125,
+            129.7330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            156.67200000000003,
+            129.7330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            21
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            49
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            69
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            29
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            62
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            71
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            35
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            62
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            61
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            29
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            19
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            21
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            11
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739802"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739811/EFTA02739811.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739811/EFTA02739811.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d20cb2d167f537def3d4dc002421a2700a8e9e90
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739811/EFTA02739811.md
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA/JOHNSON
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+# PLAINTIFF'S REPLY MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AGAINST PIECEMEAL DEPOSITIONS, AND MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE FOR PURPOSES OF DISCOVERY
+
+Plaintiff, by and through undersigned counsel, files this Reply Memorandum In Support of Motion for Protective Order Against Piecemeal Depositions, and Motion to Consolidate for Purposes of Discovery, as follows:
+
+### I. DEFENDANT FAILS TO SET FORTH ANY PREJUDICE OR CONFUSION THAT WOULD MILITATE AGAINST CONSOLIDATING THESE CASES FOR PURPOSES OF DISCOVERY
+
+In response to Plaintiffs' Motion to Consolidate, Defendant asserts that not all common issues of fact are present and the parties are not identical. These are not reasons to deny consolidation, particularly the limited consolidation for purposes of discovery sought here.' Rule 42(a), Fed.R.Civ.P., requires only a common question of law or fact, and there need not be an identity of parties. Defendant also asserts without support or explanation that "confusion will result and motions in limine will undoubtedly be filed. . ." In Ramsay v. Broward County Sheriff's Office 303 Fed. Appx. 761, 2008 WL 5237162 (1 I th Cir. 2008), the Court affirmed the District
+
+<sup>&#</sup>x27; In a case relied upon by Defendant, Kelly v. Kelly 911 F.Supp. 66 (N.D.N.Y. 1996), the issue was consolidation for purposes of joint trial, so that case is inapposite here.
+
+Court's consolidation of two employment discrimination actions, noting that the party opposing consolidation "has failed to show that the district court abused its discretion by consolidating the two actions insofar as she has introduced no evidence establishing confusion or prejudice." Id. at \*3 & n. 5.
+
+The risk of confusion or prejudice is generally more likely to arise when there is consolidation for purposes of trial, which is not being sought in the present cases at this time. See Hendrix v. Ravbestos — Manhattan. Inc. 776 F.2d 1492, 1495 (11th Cir. 1985). Here, the common and overlapping motion practice in these cases attests to the efficiencies to be gained by consolidating for purposes of discovery. Additionally, these cases are on the same or similar discovery tracks, so there would be no prejudice or confusion arising from the cases being at different stages of litigation. See Borough of Olvphant v. PPL Corp., 153 Fed. Appx. 80, 2005 WL 2673489 (3d Cir. 2005) (a case cited by Defendant, the Court noted that it has discretion to deny a motion to consolidate "if it would cause delay in one of the cases or if one of the cases is further into discovery than the other case"); see also Motor Credit Co. v. Chiorazzo, 529 F.Supp. 2d 535, 542 (D.N.J. 2008) (denying consolidation of two actions because discovery was nearly complete in one while the other was in its preliminary stages).
+
+It is within this Court's broad discretion to consolidate: "[Rule 42(a)] is a codification of a trial court's inherent managerial power 'to control disposition of the causes on its docket with economy of time and effort for itself, for counsel, and for litigants.' " Hendrix 776 F.2d at 1495 (citation omitted). Given the nature of these cases, the common facts alleged and the common issues of law, consolidation for purposes of discovery would be in the interests of judicial economy and efficiency. Defendant fails to set forth anything to the contrary.
+
+# II. THERE SHOULD BE ONLY ONE DEPOSITION FOR EACH PLAINTIFF
+
+In response to Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order to limit Defendant to a single deposition of each Plaintiff, Defendant fails to set forth any reason why it needs to take two separate depositions of each Plaintiff. Defendant asserts that it has the right to take both party depositions and witness depositions, which Plaintiff does not dispute. Where the same person is both party and witness in related cases, however, it makes eminent sense that there should be only one deposition of that person. The Court's authority to grant a protective order in this regard falls squarely within Rule 26(c), which allows such an order to be issued to protect a party from annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden or expense. The unnecessary burden and harassment that would arise from more than one deposition of a plaintiff/victim in these cases is patent and obvious, particularly since these cases concern sensitive fact issues of sex with minors.
+
+In opposition to the Motion, Defendant makes a vague reference to "proper preparation", but fails to articulate how its preparation will be prejudiced or otherwise adversely affected by a single deposition of each Plaintiff.2 To the contrary, separate depositions would create an artificial, awkward dividing line between which questions are of the deponent as a witness and which are of the deponent as a party, likely giving rise to unnecessary disputes and motion practice. Given the common and overlapping facts in these cases, there is no reason why a party witness cannot be questioned in a single sitting on all facts pertinent to Epstein. A protective order is therefore warranted in these cases so that each Plaintiff has her deposition taken only once.
+
+# Conclusion
+
+<sup>2</sup> Defendant offers as a "compromise" to limit each Plaintiff to two depositions. This would not sufficiently ameliorate the problem and concern raised in the Motion. Defendant fails to proffer any reason why it is necessary to take two separate depositions of the same witness.
+
+Based on the foregoing, and for the reasons set forth in Plaintiff's Motion for Protective Order, Motion to Quash Subpoena, and Motion to Consolidate for purposes of discovery, Plaintiff respectfully requests an Order (i) consolidating these cases for purposes of discovery; (ii) limiting the Defendant to a single deposition of each Plaintiff; and (iii) such other and further relief this Court deems just and proper.
+
+Dated: April 27, 2009 Respectfully submitted,
+
+By: s/ Stuart S. Mermelstein Stuart S. Mermelstein (FL Bar No. 947245) ssm@sexabuseattorney.com Adam D. Horowitz (FL Bar No. 376980) ahorowitz@sexabuseattomey.com MERMELSTEIN & HOROWITZ, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiff 18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160 Tel: 305-931-2200 Fax: 305-931-0877
+
+### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
+
+I hereby certify that on April 27 2009, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day to all parties on the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those parties who are not authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing.
+
+s/ Stuart S. Mermelstein
+
+# SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. jgoldberger@agwpa.com
+
+Robert D. Critton, Esq. rcritton@bciclaw.com
+
+s/ Stuart S. Mermelstein
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739811/EFTA02739811.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739811/EFTA02739811.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..028278fb93f62eca2b650b8d7308b5a840c8b2fb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739811/EFTA02739811.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,414 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739811.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 6,
+  "chars": 7116,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.25,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            405.95098876953125,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            405.95098876953125,
+            100.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            100.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "PLAINTIFF'S REPLY MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR \nPROTECTIVE ORDER AGAINST PIECEMEAL DEPOSITIONS, AND \nMOTION TO CONSOLIDATE FOR PURPOSES OF DISCOVERY",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            106.48799999999999,
+            280.26
+          ],
+          [
+            506.313232421875,
+            280.26
+          ],
+          [
+            506.313232421875,
+            324.363037109375
+          ],
+          [
+            106.48799999999999,
+            324.363037109375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "I. DEFENDANT FAILS TO SET FORTH ANY PREJUDICE \nOR CONFUSION THAT WOULD MILITATE AGAINST \nCONSOLIDATING THESE CASES FOR PURPOSES OF DISCOVERY",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            132.804,
+            421.20000000000005
+          ],
+          [
+            515.2413940429688,
+            421.20000000000005
+          ],
+          [
+            515.2413940429688,
+            464.60302734375
+          ],
+          [
+            132.804,
+            464.60302734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "II. THERE SHOULD BE ONLY ONE DEPOSITION FOR EACH PLAINTIFF",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            88.74,
+            99.63
+          ],
+          [
+            523.9160766601562,
+            99.63
+          ],
+          [
+            523.9160766601562,
+            114.7330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            88.74,
+            114.7330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Conclusion",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            274.788,
+            630.99
+          ],
+          [
+            338.2673645019531,
+            630.99
+          ],
+          [
+            338.2673645019531,
+            645.8035125732422
+          ],
+          [
+            274.788,
+            645.8035125732422
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            228.276,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            386.52947998046875,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            386.52947998046875,
+            85.863037109375
+          ],
+          [
+            228.276,
+            85.863037109375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "SERVICE LIST \nDOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN \nUnited States District Court, Southern District of Florida",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            156.67200000000003,
+            70.47
+          ],
+          [
+            455.1346740722656,
+            70.47
+          ],
+          [
+            455.1346740722656,
+            114.7330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            156.67200000000003,
+            114.7330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            59
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            29
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            55
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            39
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            20
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            19
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            21
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            11
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739811"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739817/EFTA02739817.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739817/EFTA02739817.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..341a22bc47a4553e5e2021a8a98036f7f810458c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739817/EFTA02739817.md
@@ -0,0 +1,129 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 2,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA I
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA
+
+/
+
+JANE DOE NO. 4,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 5,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRA,
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80381-MARRA/
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 6,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+CASE NO.: 08-80994-CIV-MARRA/M.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 7, CASE NO.: 08-80993-CIV-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+C.M.A., CASE NO.: 08-8081 I-CIV-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE, CASE NO.: 08- 80893-CIV-MARRA/
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN et al,
+
+Defendants.
+
+DOE II, CASE NO.: 09- 80469-CIV-MARRAi
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN et al,
+
+Defendants.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 101, CASE NO.: 09- 80591-CTV-MARla
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## ORDER
+
+THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Plaintiffs' Motion for Protective Order Against Piecemeal Depositions of Jane Doe No.'s 2, 3, 4, and 7 and Motion to Consolidate Cases for Purposes of Discovery (DE 66 in 08-80119; DE 58 in 08-80232; DE 73 in 08-80380; DE 23 in 08-80993). The Court has reviewed the motions, responses, replies, and is otherwise fully advised in the premesis. It is hereby
+
+ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:
+
+Plaintiffs' Motion for Protective Order Against Piecemeal Depositions is GRANTED, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c). As to each of the ten above-styled cases, Defendant is limited to a single deposition of each Plaintiff, during which Defendant may depose the plaintiff as both a party and a witness to all other cases of a similar nature of which the plaintiff deposed is aware. Defendant should not expect to be able to re-depose any plaintiff relative to any new cases that may be filed. Therefore, Defendant should examine each plaintiff about the facts relating to all individuals of whom they are aware, regardless of whether an individual has in fact filed a claim against Defendant. In the event additional cases are filed, upon a showing of good cause, the Court will determine whether Defendant will be permitted to re-depose any of the plaintiffs as witnesses to the allegations made in those newly filed cases.
+
+Plaintiffs' Motion to Consolidate Cases for Purposes of Discovery is GRANTED. In the interests of judicial economy and efficiency, cases 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, and 08-80993 are hereby CONSOLIDATED for purposes of discovery only.
+
+Additionally, the parties in the other six above-styled causes (08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893 09-80469, 09-80591) are hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE on or before May 5, 2009 why all of the cases should not be consolidated for discovery purposes.
+
+DONE AND ORDERED in Florida, this 28th day of April, 2009 at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County,
+
+Copies furnished to: all counsel of record
+
+rZ KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739817/EFTA02739817.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739817/EFTA02739817.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..703dc1e57af8976ed5994f6805d41483e6b0af57
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739817/EFTA02739817.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,215 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739817.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 4,
+  "chars": 3042,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.38,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            203.18400000000003,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            402.5581359863281,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            402.5581359863281,
+            100.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            203.18400000000003,
+            100.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "ORDER",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            280.296,
+            440.6400000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            329.2633361816406,
+            440.6400000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            329.2633361816406,
+            454.863037109375
+          ],
+          [
+            280.296,
+            454.863037109375
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            57
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            23
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            47
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            24
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            24
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            46
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            23
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            19
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739817"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739821/EFTA02739821.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739821/EFTA02739821.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2b5b0ba48e80d733ed012aa936114f67f84e31d9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739821/EFTA02739821.md
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA=M
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 4, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 5, CASE NO.: 08-CV-8038I-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 6, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80994-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant. /
+
+JANE DOE NO. 7, CASE NO.: 08- 80993-CIV-MARRia
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant. /
+
+## ORDER
+
+Upon Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time to File Response to Motions to Compel Plaintiffs to Respond to Defendant's First Request to Produce and First Set of Interrogatories, et al., and good cause being shown, it is hereby
+
+ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion is granted. Plaintiffs shall have an enlargement of time of until May 6, 2009, to respond to the Defendant's Motions to Compel, et al.
+
+DONE AND ORDERED in , at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this day of 2009.
+
+DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739821/EFTA02739821.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739821/EFTA02739821.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..67d2a7eb959c5e261f0c174e194934d6bdbb94b3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739821/EFTA02739821.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,147 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739821.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 2,
+  "chars": 1146,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.14,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            85.05
+          ],
+          [
+            405.95098876953125,
+            85.05
+          ],
+          [
+            405.95098876953125,
+            115.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            115.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "ORDER",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            281.52,
+            379.89
+          ],
+          [
+            330.7633361816406,
+            379.89
+          ],
+          [
+            330.7633361816406,
+            394.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            281.52,
+            394.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            49
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            22
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            43
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            22
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739821"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739823/EFTA02739823.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739823/EFTA02739823.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b87a512403b8b8e3b8fb82f5a7d975a6c7466b2a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739823/EFTA02739823.md
@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+/
+
+JANE DOE NO. 4, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MAR
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 5, CASE NO.: 08-CV-8038I-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 6, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80994-MARRA/JOHNSON
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 7, CASE NO.: 08- 80993-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## PLAINTIFFS' UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO MOTIONS TO COMPEL PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S FIRST REQUEST TO PRODUCE AND FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES, ET AL.
+
+Plaintiffs, by and through undersigned counsel, file this Motion for Enlargement to Time to File Responses to Motions to Compel Plaintiffs to Respond to Defendant's First Request to Produce and First Set of Interrogatories, et al., pursuant to S.D. Fla.L.R. 7.1 and Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(b), and states as follows:
+
+I. On April 2, 2009, Defendant Epstein filed two Motions to Compel in each of the above-captioned cases: (1) Motion to Compel Plaintiff to Respond to Defendant's First Request to Produce and to Overrule Objections, and for an Award of Defendant's Reasonable Expenses; and (2) Motion to Compel Plaintiff to Answer Defendant's First Set of Interrogatories, and to Overrule Objections, and for an Award of Defendant's Reasonable Expenses. Plaintiffs' responses to these
+
+Motions am due on April 29, 2009.
+
+2. Plaintiffs move for an enlargement of time to prepare and file their response to the Motions because of demands on Plaintiffs' counsel in this case and in other cases and matters. This includes an appellate brief presently due on May 1, 2009, in Doe v. School Bd. of Broward County and Scavella, case no. 09 -10394-E, Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals; and post-judgment motions and briefs in Elk v. United States, case no. 05-186L, Court of Federal Claims.
+
+3. Plaintiffs request an enlargement of time until May 6, 2009.
+
+4. Pursuant to S.D.Fla.L.R. 7.1(A), Plaintiffs' counsel has conferred with counsel for Defendant regarding the relief sought in this Motion, who has advised Plaintiffs' counsel that Defendant has no objection to the enlargement of time requested.
+
+WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully request an enlargement of time to file their response to the Motions to Compel et al., until and including May 6, 2009.
+
+Dated: April 29, 2009
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+By: s/ Stuart S. Mermelstein Stuart S. Mermelstein (FL Bar No. 947245) ssm@sexabuseattornev.com Adam D. Horowitz (FL Bar No. 376980) ahorowitz@sexabuseattomey.com MERMELSTEIN & HOROWITZ, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiffs 18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160 Tel: 305-931-2200 Fax: 305-931-0877
+
+## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
+
+I hereby certify that on April 29, 2009, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day to all parties on the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those parties who are not authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing.
+
+/s/ Stuart S. Mermelstein
+
+## SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. igoldberger@agwpa.com
+
+Robert D. Critton, Esq. reritton@bc1claw.com
+
+/s/ Stuart S. Mermelstein
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739823/EFTA02739823.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739823/EFTA02739823.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a0b0792aa3cd4898c9f4691d500a064b70ec1d1c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739823/EFTA02739823.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,303 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739823.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 5,
+  "chars": 3673,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.31,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            85.05
+          ],
+          [
+            406.76995849609375,
+            85.05
+          ],
+          [
+            406.76995849609375,
+            115.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            115.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "PLAINTIFFS' UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME \nTO FILE RESPONSE TO MOTIONS TO COMPEL PLAINTIFF \nTO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S FIRST REQUEST TO \nPRODUCE AND FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES, ET AL.",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            109.548,
+            407.43
+          ],
+          [
+            502.9916076660156,
+            407.43
+          ],
+          [
+            502.9916076660156,
+            464.60302734375
+          ],
+          [
+            109.548,
+            464.60302734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            227.66400000000002,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            386.50201416015625,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            386.50201416015625,
+            100.863037109375
+          ],
+          [
+            227.66400000000002,
+            100.863037109375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "SERVICE LIST \nDOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN \nUnited States District Court, Southern District of Florida",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            156.67200000000003,
+            85.05
+          ],
+          [
+            455.16455078125,
+            85.05
+          ],
+          [
+            455.16455078125,
+            129.7330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            156.67200000000003,
+            129.7330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            21
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            52
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            59
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            19
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            21
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            11
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739823"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739828/EFTA02739828.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739828/EFTA02739828.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..04ddb8d96efc8719b4156c4606835e0dbecb93d4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739828/EFTA02739828.md
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
+#### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRAIM
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff, v.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+#### DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO THIS COURT'S ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AS WHY ALL CASES SHOULD NOT BE CONSOLIDATED FOR DISCOVERY PURPOSES AND MOTION TO CLARIFY THE COURT'S ORDER DATED APRIL 28, 2009
+
+Defendant, JEFFERY EPSTEIN, (EPSTEIN), by and through his undersigned attorneys, hereby files his Response in Opposition to this Court's Order to Show Cause as to Why All Cases Should Not be Consolidated for Purposes of Discovery and Motion for Clarification of this Court's Order on general consolidation of discovery (DE 78), and states:
+
+## I. Response In Opposition
+
+Defendant has no further objections to consolidating these cases for purposes of depositions as outlined in this Court's April 28, 2009 Order.
+
+However, to consolidate the cases for purposes of all "discovery" including, but not limited to, motion practice and related orders thereto will, without question, confuse many of the individual discovery issues raised not only by Epstein as to the individual Plaintiffs that have brought separate lawsuits against him, but will also confuse the individual discovery issues raised by those same individual Plaintiffs as to Epstein. This will undoubtedly lead to several motions to clarify certain orders which will seek
+
+explanation from the court as to how those orders affect Epstein as to each individual Plaintiffs discovery requests and vice versa (i.e., how those future orders affect the individual Plaintiffs' discovery requests directed to Epstein).
+
+It is important to note that each related Federal matter before this court has its very own distinct set of facts and defenses thereto. As such, the discovery served and the responses received are particular and individualized as to both Plaintiff and Defendant. As such, discovery of "all" cases for general discovery consolidation (separate and apart from depositions) will only cloud rulings on discovery and will result in more attorney labor and judicial resources, which will inevitably be spent on motions for clarification.
+
+Each Plaintiff and Epstein have served and will in the future serve separate requests for production, separate interrogatories, separate requests for admissions, and separate motions to compel, responses and replies addressing certain discovery issues. Obviously, both Plaintiff and Defendant will base their discovery related arguments on the particularized facts of each case, which are separate and distinct from one another. Moreover, the Plaintiffs will likely seek to retain different experts to support their individual claims. In that regard, how will a general consolidation of discovery impact discovery related to those experts' individualized opinions?
+
+As this court is aware, certain case management orders are in place setting the parameters of discovery. It is unclear how Plaintiffs' Motion to Consolidate and the Courts Order will handle the potential problems and any other potential discovery related issues outlined above. In fact, it appears that Jane Doe, in Case No. 08-CV-80893 (DE 47), has expressed her own reasons for opposing the consolidation all the
+
+cases for discovery purposes. Obviously, Jane Doe's counsel, like the undersigned, anticipates that discovery issues will present themselves if general consolidation occurs and does not want it to impact her case. In fact, the debates have already begun in light of this Court's April 29, 2009 Order and the responses filed addressing same. This provides the court with a glimpse of what will occur if general consolidation occurs, in particular, how attorney resources and judicial resources will be unnecessarily used.
+
+In addition, the initial style of each case should be maintained in pleadings and in orders in an effort to maintain organization and application of the rulings this court espouses for each case. Utilizing a compound multiple-type style will only confuse cases that should be kept separate for all discovery purposes.
+
+# II. Motion for Clarification of this Court's April 28, 2009 Order
+
+This Court ruled that cases 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380 and 08-80993 are consolidated for discovery purposes. Epstein not only objects to the court's consolidation order but seeks clarification from this Court as to how consolidation of general discovery will impact motion practice and orders in the above cases. What does the court mean when it says the above cases are consolidated "for purposes of discovery only?" How does consolidation operate? The concerns addressing general discovery consolidation are set out above and are therefore incorporated herein. Likewise, for those reasons, the court should reverse its ruling on consolidation and issue a new order maintaining the individuality of each case for discovery purposes.
+
+In addition, Epstein not only objects to the court's potential consolidation of case numbers 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469 and 09-80591 for general discovery purposes, but respectfully requests that this court clarify how
+
+consolidation of general discovery will impact motion practice and orders in the above cases should this court choose to consolidate same for discovery. Again, how does consolidation operate? The concerns addressing general discovery consolidation are set out above and are therefore incorporated herein.
+
+In short, the Motions seeking consolidation for discovery purposes only do not delineate how consolidation operates. As such, the Order granting the Motions to Consolidate for discovery purposes only does not provide any additional information addressing how consolidation will operate.
+
+WHEREFORE, Defendant requests that this Court not consolidate case numbers 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469 and 09-80591, that it clarify its order as to consolidation of case numbers 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380 and 08- 80993 (or the future consolidation of other cases) and that it reverse its April 28, 2009 ruling on general consolidation in light of the potential problems presented in this response, that an order be entered requiring the parties to utilize the style secured by the initial case filing and not a compound-case style incorporating all case styles in one particular document, and for such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper.
+
+> By: (-/ / ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ.
+
+### Certificate of Service
+
+I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the fo oing document is being served this day on all counsel of record/ "dentified on thgAf own Service List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on this day of , 2009:
+
+Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq.  
+Adam D. Horowitz, Esq.  
+Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A.  
+18205 Biscayne Boulevard  
+Suite 2218  
+Miami, FL 33160  
+305-931-2200  
+Fax: 305-931-0877  
+[ssm@sexabuseattorney.com](mailto:ssm@sexabuseattorney.com)  
+[ahorowitz@sexabuseattorney.com](mailto:ahorowitz@sexabuseattorney.com)  
+*Counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe #3*
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger  
+Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.  
+250 Australian Avenue South  
+Suite 1400  
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012  
+561-659-8300  
+Fax: 561-835-8691  
+[jagesq@bellsouth.net](mailto:jagesq@bellsouth.net)  
+*Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein*
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+![]()
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739828/EFTA02739828.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739828/EFTA02739828.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..38390b131f5f40db6eb33dbf813d9af4008e49d3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739828/EFTA02739828.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,314 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739828.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 5,
+  "chars": 7458,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 3.55,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            202.572,
+            71.06744384765625
+          ],
+          [
+            410.5253601074219,
+            71.06744384765625
+          ],
+          [
+            410.5253601074219,
+            99.91998291015625
+          ],
+          [
+            202.572,
+            99.91998291015625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO THIS COURT'S ORDER TO \nSHOW CAUSE AS WHY ALL CASES SHOULD NOT BE CONSOLIDATED FOR DISCOVERY \nPURPOSES AND MOTION TO CLARIFY THE COURT'S ORDER DATED APRIL 28, 2009",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            69.156,
+            290.0675048828125
+          ],
+          [
+            543.9149780273438,
+            290.0675048828125
+          ],
+          [
+            543.9149780273438,
+            330.9200134277344
+          ],
+          [
+            69.156,
+            330.9200134277344
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "I. Response In Opposition",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            217.87199999999999,
+            481.14
+          ],
+          [
+            398.3625793457031,
+            481.14
+          ],
+          [
+            398.3625793457031,
+            496.29998779296875
+          ],
+          [
+            217.87199999999999,
+            496.29998779296875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "II. Motion for Clarification of this Court's April 28, 2009 Order",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            137.7,
+            369.36
+          ],
+          [
+            513.4051513671875,
+            369.36
+          ],
+          [
+            513.4051513671875,
+            385.67999267578125
+          ],
+          [
+            137.7,
+            385.67999267578125
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Certificate of Service",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            263.15999999999997,
+            636.66
+          ],
+          [
+            388.9054260253906,
+            636.66
+          ],
+          [
+            388.9054260253906,
+            651.5500030517578
+          ],
+          [
+            263.15999999999997,
+            651.5500030517578
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            50
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            55
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739828"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739833/EFTA02739833.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739833/EFTA02739833.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0823c193778b80ba2372d80aad7023c6b4dd766f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739833/EFTA02739833.md
@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+v.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO FILE REPLY TO PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STAY
+
+Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, (hereinafter "Epstein") by and through his undersigned attorneys, respectfully moves this Court for an extension of time in which to file his Reply to Plaintiffs Response in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Stay Complaint.
+
+1. On April 23, 2009 Plaintiff filed a Response [DE 74] in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Stay [DE 57]. Defendant's reply would be due on May 5, 2009 (5 days to reply excluding weekends + mailing). Defendant is requesting a fifteen (15) day extension to May 20, 2009 to reply.
+
+2. There are several other cases filed with this Court in which Jeffrey Epstein is named a Defendant. In those cases, the undersigned has been handling other matters associated therewith.
+
+3. Additionally, Defendant's counsel is in the midst of preparing for a state court trial, CARDIOPULMONARY & PRIMARY CARE ASSOC. OF TREASURE COAST, P.A v. , M.D., Case No. 562008CA001726, specially set for trial beginning May 13 Jane Doe No. 3 v. Epstein Page 2
+
+through 15, 2009). Discovery in that case is ongoing with several depositions set to prepare for trial.
+
+4. The requested extension is fair and reasonable under the circumstances as it will provide time to allow the Defendant, EPSTEIN, to fully and adequately reply.
+
+5. An extension until May 20, 2009, is fair and reasonable under the circumstances. The undersigned is in need of the additional time in order to fully and adequately prepare a response on behalf of EPSTEIN.
+
+6. As certified below, counsel for Defendant conferred with counsel by e-mail, and Plaintiffs counsel is in agreement with the requested extension.
+
+WHEREFORE Defendant respectfully requests that this Court enter an order granting an extension until May 20, 2009, to file a Reply to Plaintiffs Response in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Stay Complaint.
+
+## Local Rule 7.1 Statement
+
+Counsel for the movant conferred by e-mail with counsel for the Plaintiff and Counsel for Plaintiff is in agreement with the requested extension until May 20, 2009 for Defendant to reply to Plaintiffs Response to Defenda to Stay Complaint.
+
+> Robe p. CrihOn, Jr. Attorney for Defendant Epstein
+
+## Certificate of Service
+
+I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record identified on the following Service List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on this 5th day of May 2009:
+
+Jane Doe No. 3 v. Epstein  
+Page 3
+
+Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq.  
+Adam D. Horowitz, Esq.  
+Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A.  
+18205 Biscayne Boulevard  
+Suite 2218  
+Miami, FL 33160  
+305-931-2200  
+Fax: 305-931-0877  
+[ssm@sexabuseattorney.com](mailto:ssm@sexabuseattorney.com)  
+[ahorowitz@sexabuseattorney.com](mailto:ahorowitz@sexabuseattorney.com)  
+*Counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe #2*
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger  
+Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.  
+250 Australian Avenue South  
+Suite 1400  
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012  
+561-659-8300  
+Fax: 561-835-8691  
+[jagesq@bellsouth.net](mailto:jagesq@bellsouth.net)  
+*Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein*
+
+![]()![]()
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739833/EFTA02739833.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739833/EFTA02739833.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cc9a4a5f1ffbf822110af4046027936a4cf36db6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739833/EFTA02739833.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,219 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739833.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 3,
+  "chars": 3458,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 3.54,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            202.61999999999998,
+            83.42999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            412.4285583496094,
+            83.42999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            412.4285583496094,
+            112.56353759765625
+          ],
+          [
+            202.61999999999998,
+            112.56353759765625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO FILE REPLY \nTO PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STAY",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            74.294,
+            303.75
+          ],
+          [
+            539.092,
+            303.75
+          ],
+          [
+            539.092,
+            331.56353759765625
+          ],
+          [
+            74.294,
+            331.56353759765625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Local Rule 7.1 Statement",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            237.004,
+            434.15999999999997
+          ],
+          [
+            372.7584533691406,
+            434.15999999999997
+          ],
+          [
+            372.7584533691406,
+            449.03997802734375
+          ],
+          [
+            237.004,
+            449.03997802734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Certificate of Service",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            260.33599999999996,
+            626.13
+          ],
+          [
+            385.5652770996094,
+            626.13
+          ],
+          [
+            385.5652770996094,
+            641.0399932861328
+          ],
+          [
+            260.33599999999996,
+            641.0399932861328
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            60
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            9
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739833"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739836/EFTA02739836.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739836/EFTA02739836.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..495c79e501ae4657a0f5a3db61b4975f459b910f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739836/EFTA02739836.md
@@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
+### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA I
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 4, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 5, CASE NO.: 08-CV-8038I-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 6, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80994-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 7, CASE NO.: 08- 80993-CIV-MARRA I
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+#### PLAINTIFFS' MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO COMPEL ANSWERS TO FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES AND FOR AN AWARD OF REASONABLE EXPENSES
+
+Plaintiffs, JANE DOES 2-7, by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby file this Memorandum in Opposition to Epstein's Motion to Compel Plaintiffs to Answer First Set of Interrogatories and for an Award of Reasonable Expenses, and state as follows:
+
+### I. Introduction
+
+Defendant Epstein served an Interrogatory (# 18) seeking to unearth explicit information on every bit of possible sexual conduct and activity in chronological order which each Jane Doe might have engaged in since age 10, including the names and phone numbers of all persons with whom they had sexual contact.' Plaintiffs properly objected to these interrogatories in that discovery on
+
+Plaintiffs also object to Interrogatory nos. 19, 20, and 21, served on each of them, which seek the identities and contact information of any men whom Plaintiffs' claim committed sexual assault or
+
+the sexual history of a childhood abuse victim is substantially limited in federal court, "courts should presumptively issue protective orders barring discovery unless the party seeking discovery makes a showing that the evidence sought to be discovered would be relevant under the facts and theories of the particular case and cannot be obtained except through discovery." See Fed. R. Evid. 412, Advisory Committee Notes to 1994 Amendments, subdivision (c). Defendant has made no such showing in his Motion to Compel to overcome this presumption. Accordingly, Defendant's Motion to Compel must be denied in its entirety.
+
+# H. Argument
+
+Epstein incorrectly argues that Fed.R.Evid 412 is strictly an evidentiary rule and that Rule 26(b) must be read exclusively to determine whether information about an abuse victim's sexual history is discoverable. The Rule 412 Advisory Committee Notes, however, instruct that Rule 412 affects not only the admissibility of evidence at trial, but must also "inform the discovery process." Barta v. City and County of Honolulu, 169 F.R.D. 132 (D. Haw. 1996). The Committee Notes state, in relevant part, as follows:
+
+> Courts should presumptively issue protective orders barring discovery unless the party seeking discovery makes a showing that the evidence sought to be discovered would be relevant under the
+
+battery, or engaged in lewd and lascivious conduct or exhibition, against them. Unlike interrogatory no. 18, which asks for information regarding all men other than Epstein with whom the Plaintiffs have had sexual activity, interrogatory nos. 19-21 are at least limited to criminal conduct. Nonetheless, these interrogatories are overbroad and unnecessarily infringe on the Plaintiffs' privacy interests, particularly since they seek identity and contact information of men other than Epstein whom Plaintiffs claim committed sexual crimes against them. As discussed infra, discovery on a victim in a case of this nature is tempered by Fed.R.Evid., 412, and, as a result, a party is not entitled to carte blanche discovery on sexual matters involving the victim. There must be a balancing of interests based on the discovery sought. Here, Defendant contends that the information it seeks in interrogatory nos. 19-21 is relevant to Plaintiffs' damages claims, but fails to state in this regard why the perpetrator's identity and contact information specifically is relevant and should be discoverable. This discovery should not therefore be allowed.
+
+facts and theories of the particular case and cannot be obtained except through discovery.
+
+Nowhere in Defendant's Motion is it explained how or why this presumption should be overcome. It is well established under Fed.R.Evid. 412 that a victim's past sexual behavior is wholly irrelevant to the credibility of her testimony, and that her prior and subsequent sexual activity with third parties has no bearing on the issue of whether she consented to or complied with the sexual acts charged. ee United States v. M, 472 F.2d 909, 919 (5th Cir. 1973). Virgin Islands v. =, 634 F.Supp. 933, 936-37 (D. V.I. 1986) (policy of rule disallowing evidence to show character of assault victim); Dept. of Professional Regulation v. Wise 575 So.2d 713 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991) (holding that evidence of sexual relations with a person other than an accused is not relevant). One commentator has noted that once the identity of persons and similarity of circumstances are removed, "probative value all but disappears." See Ordover, Admissibility of Patterns of Similar Sexual Conduct: The Unlamented Death of Character for Chastity, 63 Cornell L. Rev. 96, 106 (1977). The discovery at issue is not limited to sexual contact involving similar circumstances, and is therefore lacking in probative value. Defendant fails in his Motion to demonstrate otherwise.
+
+Defendant's argument that Rule 412 is merely an evidentiary rule that should be disregarded in discovery disputes has been routinely rejected in federal courts. See a, Barta v. City and County of Honolulu, 169 F.R.D. 132 (D. Haw. 1996) (granting protective order pursuant to Rule 412 to prevent a sexual battery and harassment victim from having to disclose off-duty sexual contacts with persons other than defendant in discovery); Herron v. Eastern Industries. Inc. 2007 WL 2781211 (N.D. Fla. Sept. 19, 2007); Gibbons v. Food Lion, Inc. 1999 WL 33226474 (M.D. Fla. Feb. 19, 1999); P.J. Herchenroeder v. John Univ. Applied Physical Lab, 171 F.RD. 179 (D. Md. 1997) (looking at both Rule 26 and Rule 412 in resolving discovery motion); v. 166 F.R.D. 500 (D. N.M. 1996) (explaining that "[a]Ithough the present motion arises in the context of discovery under Rule 26, the Court must remain mindful of Rule 412 and its implications); Stalnaker v. Kmart Cup, 1996 WL 397563 (D. Kan. 1996) (noting that Rule 412 "is applicable and has significance in deciding certain discovery motions").
+
+As the above-referenced cases make abundantly clear, childhood sexual abuse cases are not garden-variety litigation subject to traditional broad discovery concerning a victim's sexual history. Rule 412 is designed to protect victims of sexual misconduct from undue embarrassment and intrusion into their private affairs. See Fed R.Evid. 412. The committee notes explain that the Rule is also intended to prevent "sexual stereotyping that is associated with public disclosure of intimate sexual details and the infusion of sexual innuendo into the factfinding process." Rule 412, Advisory Committee Notes to 1994 Amendments. Common sense dictates that requiring a sexual abuse victim to disclose the intimate details sought by Epstein during the discovery process — which then would presumably lead to additional discovery of the victim's other sexual partners — would be at least as embarrassing and intrusive during the discovery process as it would be if the victim were questioned about these facts at trial, if not more. Thus, in order to carry out its purpose, Rule 412 "must inform the discovery process" and the Court "must impose certain restriction on discovery to preclude inquiry into areas which will clearly fail to satisfy the balancing test" set forth in Rule 412. See Barta v. City and County of Honolulu, 169 F.R.D. at 135.
+
+In Barta the Court confronted this issue in the context of a discovery motion in a civil case. 169 F.R.D. at 133. A former employee brought a sexual harassment and battery claim against her former employer and individual employees. Id. The defendants asked questions at deposition which delved into the plaintiff's sexual conduct outside the workplace. Id. at 134. The Court did not allow these questions and wait until trial to determine admissibility. Id. at 135. Instead, the Court sustained the plaintiff's objections. Id. The Court based its decision on Fed.R.Evid. 412. Id.
+
+Although noting that Rule 412 controls the admissibility of evidence, the Court explained that it must also apply Rule 412 to "impose certain restrictions on discovery to preclude inquiry into areas which will clearly satisfy the balancing test of 412(b)(2)..." Id. Thus, the Court concluded that the defendants should not be permitted to inquire into the plaintiff's conduct while she was off-duty, outside the workplace, and which did not involve the same defendants. The same rationale should apply here. The Defendant should not be permitted to seek intimate details of Plaintiff's sexual conduct throughout her life — particularly if it did not involve similar criminal circumstances such as those involving Epstein.
+
+Defendant attached three Florida state court orders to its Motion, two of which are trial court decisions. These cases do not serve as precedent for this Court, and in any event, they are not persuasive. Unlike state courts, federal courts must focus on the interplay between Fed.R.Evid. 412 and Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(b), and in this regard must be concerned with embarrassment to the victim and protection of her privacy. Indeed, it does not appear that an analogous argument was made in any of the state court cases relied upon by Defendant. Furthermore, the discovery in Balas v. Russo, 703 So.2d 1076 (Ha. 3d DCA 1997) was far narrower than that which is at issue here. It was limited to asking plaintiffs for their employment history (which admittedly included prostitution), employment records, electronic recording of the conduct which was the subject of the complaint, and a description of her damages. 703 So.2d 1077-78. At no time were the plaintiffs in Balas asked to disclose their entire sexually history beginning at age 10. Id. Thus, the three state court cases cited in the Motion are not helpful to the Defendant, and should not deflect attention from the burden placed on the party in federal court seeking discovery of a victim's other sexual contacts.
+
+Finally, Defendant's request for attorney's fees and costs is completely unwarranted. The present motion and response involve good-faith, timely and well-founded objections by Plaintiffs to over-reaching and harassing discovery efforts. Accordingly. Defendant's request for award of reasonable expenses should be denied.
+
+## Conclusion
+
+Based on the foregoing, Plaintiffs respectfully request that Defendant Epstein's Motions to Compel Plaintiffs to Answer First Set of Interrogatories and for an Award of Reasonable Expenses be denied in their entirety.
+
+Dated: May 6, 2009 Respectfully submitted,
+
+By: s/ Adam D. Horowitz Stuart S. Mermelstein (FL Bar No. 947245) ssm@sexabuseattorney.com Adam D. Horowitz (FL Bar No. 376980) ahorowitz@sexabuseattorney.com MERMELSTEIN & HOROWITZ, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiffs 18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160 Tel: (305) 931-2200 Fax: (305) 931-0877
+
+### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
+
+I hereby certify that on May 6, 2009, I electronically tiled the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day to all parties on the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those parties who are not authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing.
+
+/s/ Adam D. Horowitz
+
+### SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. igoldberger@agwpa.com
+
+Roben D. Critton, Esq. rcritton@bc1claw.com
+
+/s/ Adam D. Horowitz
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739836/EFTA02739836.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739836/EFTA02739836.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..47afcbfe470baf9a487937feef19d138c0818874
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739836/EFTA02739836.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,520 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739836.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 9,
+  "chars": 12108,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.54,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            408.26995849609375,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            408.26995849609375,
+            100.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            100.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "PLAINTIFFS' MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION \nTO EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO COMPEL ANSWERS TO FIRST SET OF \nINTERROGATORIES AND FOR AN AWARD OF REASONABLE EXPENSES",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            94.86,
+            393.65999999999997
+          ],
+          [
+            517.7341918945312,
+            393.65999999999997
+          ],
+          [
+            517.7341918945312,
+            436.863037109375
+          ],
+          [
+            94.86,
+            436.863037109375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "I. Introduction",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            252.144,
+            533.79
+          ],
+          [
+            359.27581787109375,
+            533.79
+          ],
+          [
+            359.27581787109375,
+            548.6030120849609
+          ],
+          [
+            252.144,
+            548.6030120849609
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "H. Argument",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            261.324,
+            281.07
+          ],
+          [
+            353.97564697265625,
+            281.07
+          ],
+          [
+            353.97564697265625,
+            296.68353271484375
+          ],
+          [
+            261.324,
+            296.68353271484375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Conclusion",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            274.176,
+            141.75
+          ],
+          [
+            337.39495849609375,
+            141.75
+          ],
+          [
+            337.39495849609375,
+            157.10302734375
+          ],
+          [
+            274.176,
+            157.10302734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            227.66400000000002,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            387.2200622558594,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            387.2200622558594,
+            100.56353759765625
+          ],
+          [
+            227.66400000000002,
+            100.56353759765625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "SERVICE LIST \nDOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN \nUnited States District Court, Southern District of Florida",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            156.67200000000003,
+            85.05
+          ],
+          [
+            455.16455078125,
+            85.05
+          ],
+          [
+            455.16455078125,
+            129.7330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            156.67200000000003,
+            129.7330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            49
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            24
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            20
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            65
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            32
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            63
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            55
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            44
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            21
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            19
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            21
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            11
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739836"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739845/EFTA02739845.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739845/EFTA02739845.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2af49d04ca78ec2a1838253b48c0b9984279a1f5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739845/EFTA02739845.md
@@ -0,0 +1,140 @@
+*Diare*
+
+**UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT  
+SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA**
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA [REDACTED]
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+v.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+\_\_\_\_\_/
+
+**PLAINTIFF JANE DOE 3'S ANSWERS TO DEFENDANT'S FIRST  
+INTERROGATORIES**
+
+Plaintiff, JANE DOE 3, by and through their undersigned counsel, and pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 33, hereby responds to Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S First Set of Interrogatories to Plaintiff as follows:
+
+**General Objections**
+
+1. Plaintiff objects to Defendant's Interrogatories to the extent that the Interrogatories call for the disclosure of information protected by the attorney-client privilege, attorney work-product doctrine, or other applicable privilege or immunity, whether created by statute or common law. Plaintiff claims such privileges and protections to the extent implicated by each Interrogatory, and excludes privileged and protected information from any responses to Defendant's discovery. Any disclosure is inadvertent and is not intended to waive those privileges or protections, which are specifically reserved.
+
+2. Plaintiff objects to Defendant's Interrogatories to the extent that same are vague, ambiguous, incomprehensible and/or overly broad.
+
+**"A"**
+
+![](_page_0_Picture_270.jpeg)
+
+Doe No. 3 v. Epstein
+
+Page 8
+
+No.
+
+- 9. Describe each injury (physical, emotional, mental) for which you are claiming damages In this case, specifying the part of your body that was injured, the nature of the injury, and as to any injuries you contend are permanent, the effects on you that you claim are permanent.
+
+Answer.
+
+Plaintiff has suffered severe psychological, emotional and psychical injuries, including without limitation, anxiety, depression, suicidal ideation, guilt, selfblame, feelings of being degraded, feeling unattractive, diminished sense of feminity, fluctuations in weight/appetite, sexual/intimacy problems, flashbacks, disturbing memories, stress, irritability, feelings of being isolated and trapped, diminished trust, social problems, problems in personal relationships, Indecisiveness, lower energy, lower ambition and initiative, headaches, back pain, feels stress (particularly around men), obsessive thoughts, problems concentrating, alcohol abuse, corruption of morals and values, loss of innocence. and cries abt.
+
+Plaintiffs psychological and emotional injuries will be analyzed and explained by aforensic expert, whose opinions and related information will be disclosed in accordance with the expert discovery rules of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff reserves the right to supplement this response in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
+
+- 10. Please state each item of damage that you claim, and include in your answer the count to which the item of damages relates; the factual basis for each item of damages; and an explanation of how you computed each item of damages, including any mathematical formula used.
+
+Answer:
+
+Plaintiff objects to this interrogatory as calling for an expert opinion and calculation. Subject to said objection, Plaintiff states that she seeks damages arising from her psychological and emotional injuries. These damages include pain and suffering, costs of psychological care and treatment, and loss of earning capacity. The pecuniary elements of these damages will be analyzed and computed by an appropriate expert.
+
+Discovery is ongoing and will be supplemented in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
+
+Doe No. 3 v. Epstein Page 14
+
+Plaintiff was paid \$100 for bringinall
+
+- 24. Please list each time you were interviewed by any state or federal law enforcement agent or prosecutor, who was present, whether notes were taken, and what you recall saying to them.
+
+Answer:
+
+See Plaintiff's Answer to Interrogatory No. 22.
+
+- 25. Please describe any statements made to you by any federal or state law enforcement agent or prosecutor regarding the availability of civil remedies against Mr. Epstein and regarding whether there would be any benefit from your voluntary cooperation with law enforcement.
+
+Answer:
+
+Plaintiff received correspondence in July and September, 2008, from A.U.S.A. A. n care of the undersigned attorney. No statements were ever amm e9H cooperation in the criminal case would benefit a civil claim.
+
+January, , 2009 Respectfully submitted:
+
+HERMAN & MERMELSTEIN P.A. 18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160 www.hermanlaw.com Tel: 305-931-2200 Fax: 345,8110877
+
+B :
+
+Jeffrey M. Herman jherrnan(Whermanlaw.com Florida Bar No. 521647 Stuart S. Mermelstein smermelsteineherrnanlaw.com Florida Bar No. 947245 Adam D. Horowitz ahorowitz0hermanlawcom
+
+**VERIFICATION**
+
+[REDACTED] being duly sworn, deposes and says that the foregoing answers to interrogatories are true and correct to the best of her knowledge, information and belief.
+
+[REDACTED]
+
+STATE OF FLORIDA )  
+COUNTY OF PALM BEACH ) ss
+
+[REDACTED] WORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED before me this 19 day of January, 2009 by [REDACTED], who is personally known to me or has produced the following identification 1. Rivers Kicewsi which is current or has been issued within the past five years and bears a serial or other identifying number.
+
+Elizabeth Gutierrez  
+Print Name
+
+Elizabeth Gutierrez  
+Signature
+
+NOTARY PUBLIC - STATE OF FLORIDA  
+Commission Number:  
+My commission expires:  
+(Notarial Seal)
+
+![](_page_3_Picture_24.jpeg)
+
+Doe No. 3 v. Epstein  
+Page 16
+
+**Certificate of Service**
+
+WE HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing has been sent via U.S. Mail and facsimile to the following addressees this 26 day of January, 2009.
+
+Robert D. Critton, Jr, Esq.  
+Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman  
+515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400  
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401  
+561/842-2820 Phone  
+561/515-3148 Fax  
+[rcrit@bclclaw.com](mailto:rcrit@bclclaw.com)  
+*Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein*
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq.  
+Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.  
+250 Australian Avenue South  
+Suite 1400  
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012  
+561-659-8300  
+Fax: 561-835-8691  
+[jagesq@bellsouth.net](mailto:jagesq@bellsouth.net)  
+*Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein*
+
+Michael R. Tein, Esq.  
+██████████ Tein, P.L.  
+3059 Grand Avenue, Suite 340  
+Coconut Grove, FL 33133  
+305-442-1101  
+Fax: 305 442 6744  
+*Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein*  
+[tein@lewistein.com](mailto:tein@lewistein.com)
+
+![]()
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739845/EFTA02739845.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739845/EFTA02739845.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..265c4ce9dd2ce114fc7fc91adf32bf6ae18f5648
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739845/EFTA02739845.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,333 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739845.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 5,
+  "chars": 6420,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 6.53,
+  "image_assets": [
+    "_page_0_Picture_270.jpeg",
+    "_page_3_Picture_24.jpeg"
+  ],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            180.54,
+            72.9
+          ],
+          [
+            385.56000000000006,
+            72.9
+          ],
+          [
+            385.56000000000006,
+            105.30000000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            180.54,
+            105.30000000000001
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "PLAINTIFF JANE DOE 3'S ANSWERS TO DEFENDANT'S FIRST INTERROGATORIES",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            104.03999999999999,
+            291.6
+          ],
+          [
+            471.24,
+            291.6
+          ],
+          [
+            471.24,
+            328.05
+          ],
+          [
+            104.03999999999999,
+            328.05
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "General Objections",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            232.56,
+            413.09999999999997
+          ],
+          [
+            345.78,
+            413.09999999999997
+          ],
+          [
+            345.78,
+            433.35
+          ],
+          [
+            232.56,
+            433.35
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "VERIFICATION",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            253.98,
+            87.48
+          ],
+          [
+            339.66,
+            87.48
+          ],
+          [
+            339.66,
+            101.25
+          ],
+          [
+            253.98,
+            101.25
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Certificate of Service",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            235.00799999999998,
+            112.59
+          ],
+          [
+            357.408,
+            112.59
+          ],
+          [
+            357.408,
+            126.35999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            235.00799999999998,
+            126.35999999999999
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            210
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            24
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "Picture",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            390
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            38
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            9
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            72
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            34
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            11
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            13
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "Picture",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739845"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739845/_page_0_Picture_270.jpeg b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739845/_page_0_Picture_270.jpeg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..245e4e6cc5d752877cdd2bbf7203e603e6067273
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739845/_page_0_Picture_270.jpeg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:f0deb1a32e76e49fcd011dcc7a5df2cb23739003d66655acdc88dc4f608402b4
+size 3840
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739845/_page_3_Picture_24.jpeg b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739845/_page_3_Picture_24.jpeg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6ce5e652f335c3f77cf5bcf2f2e0d7f01f6a1e5f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739845/_page_3_Picture_24.jpeg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:4fbae34f501dd271c5c5fbe299645a58bc924aa9dde95a992737560a2df15427
+size 10782
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739850/EFTA02739850.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739850/EFTA02739850.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..225cc5e2b77eb4118191d2282863111cdd45e066
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739850/EFTA02739850.md
@@ -0,0 +1,125 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA-IMI
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff, v.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+#### MOTION TO COMPEL AND/OR IDENTIFY JANE DOE #3 IN THE STYLE OF THIS CASE AND MOTION TO IDENTIFY JANE DOE IN THIRD-PARTY SUBPOENAS FOR PURPOSES OF DISCOVERY, OR ALTERNATIVELY, MOTION TO DISMISS SUA SPONTE, WITH INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW'
+
+Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN ("Epstein" or "Defendant"), by and through his undersigned attorneys, hereby requests that this Court enter an order identifying in the style of this case the complete legal name of the Plaintiff, JANE DOE #3 ("JANE DOE"), to substitute her complete legal name in this case in place of "JANE DOE" and, equally important, allowing Defendant to identify her in various subpoenas that Epstein must serve so Epstein can defend this case or, alternatively, Motion to Dismiss Entire Action Sua Sponte. In support, Mr. Epstein states as follows:
+
+### I. Motion And Incorporated Memorandum Of Law
+
+#### a. Background
+
+1. On March 5, 2008, Plaintiff, a 20-year-old female, filed this action against Epstein.
+
+<sup>1</sup> Several of the discovery responses attached to this Motion and to the companion \*Motions to Identify" filed in other related matters are markedly different. Therefore, each requires the court's attention on an individual basis.
+
+2. On February 27, 2009, Plaintiff filed her Second Amended Complaint against Epstein, which alleges three causes of action against him: Count I — Sexual Assault and Battery; Count II — Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress; and Count III — Coercion and Enticement to Sexual Activity in violation of 18 U.S.C. §2422.
+
+3. The Second Amended Complaint appears to raise both Federal and Florida State substantive issues (DE 56).
+
+4. Plaintiff alleges, among other things, that she is entitled to money damages pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. §2422 and 2255 (in the wherefore clause) and by virtue her claims that Epstein sexually battered her and caused her emotional distress. Plaintiff alleges separate counts against Mr. Epstein, on which he must conduct discovery to defend this case.
+
+5. In particular, JANE DOE claims, in Count I for sexual battery, that she has and will suffer ". . .severe and permanent traumatic injuries, including mental, psychological and emotional damages." ¶21, 2nd Am. Comp. DE 56. In Count II for Sexual Battery, plaintiff claims entitlement to recover for ". . .severe mental anguish and pain" ¶27, 2nd Am. Comp., DE 56. In Count III for Coercion and Enticement to Sexual Activity in violation of 18 U.S.C. §2422, plaintiff claims entitlement to recover for ". . .personal injury, including mental, psychological and emotional damages" ¶33, 2nd Am. Comp., DE 56. Plaintiff also claims entitlement to "punitive damages" and "actual and compensatory damages" and "loss of earning capacity." DE 56. See also Exhibit "A", Interrogatory Response Number 9-10.
+
+6. Epstein has a constitutional due process right to defend himself and to seek the production of information that will assist in his defense of the allegations in the 2nd Amended Complaint. In this case, Plaintiff's counsel objected to Epstein serving subpoenas on Plaintiffs treating physicians and other third parties. Thus, this motion seeks to identify JANE DOE in the style of this case, to identify JANE DOE in various third-party subpoenas for discovery purposes and, alternatively, to dismiss this entire action sua sponte. The undersigned's experience in "Jane Doe" lawsuits is that once a Plaintiff is identified, other individuals come forward in the discovery phase with information which often directly contradicts allegations as to the events and damages. For instance, witnesses may testify that Plaintiff was paid by others for similar sexual acts she claims Mr. Epstein forced upon her or that she willingly participated in certain act(s) that would negate or lessen her damages. This goes directly to Plaintiffs damage claim.
+
+7. Likewise, subpoenas must be issued to third-party treaters and current and former employers, and those subpoenas will seek to obtain records related directly to Plaintiffs claims and her damages (i.e., her claim for severe and permanent traumatic injuries, including mental, psychological and emotional damages" and loss of self-esteem and dignity as referenced above). Cherenfant v. Nationwide Credit, Inc. 2004 WL 5315889 (S.D. Fla. 2004)(order allowing discovery of medical records consistent with Plaintiffs allegations in complaint). This too goes directly to Plaintiffs damage claims. Medical providers, employers, co-employees, etc...have direct and relevant personal knowledge and
+
+observations regarding damages, i.e., emotional state, activities, self-esteem, etc....
+
+8. Fed.R.Civ.Pro. 26 allows for broad discovery. Epstein is not required to rely solely on Plaintiff's discovery responses in defending this case, nor is Epstein required by any statute or law to rely only upon what Plaintiff produces in discovery or may obtain from her own medical treaters through her counsel, and to then provide to Epstein only after Plaintiff has reviewed same. In certain related state court actions involving Epstein, the undersigned offered to serve certain subpoenas on the medical treaters and other third-parties with full name, date of birth and Plaintiffs social security number (last four digits), but agreed that the subpoenas filed with the clerk would be redacted. Several attorneys agreed to this procedure in those cases. In Federal Court, subpoenas are not filed with the clerk. Thus, in this matter, the undersigned offered to serve the third-party subpoenas with plaintiff's full name, date of birth and social security number (last four digits) and would agree to redact any identifying information on any documents filed with this court if that ultimately became necessary. As discussed below, Plaintiff's counsel did not agree. Further, Plaintiffs counsel claims a HIPPA complaint protective order is necessary. Such is not the case when a Plaintiff places her mental, emotional, psychological and physical condition at issue.
+
+9. Moreover, when an order from the court is attached to the Subpoena, treaters and other third parties produce the records and show up to the depositions with the records requested because the deponent knows what to bring by virtue of knowing the identity of the Plaintiff.
+
+10. Epstein's counsel intends to serve and depose witnesses duces tecum. If Epstein is not permitted to identify JANE DOE, how will any deponent know who the parties are and what to bring to the deposition pursuant to the duces tecum? Further, how will Epstein be able to defend the claims. Just like the Plaintiff, Epstein is entitled to due process.
+
+11. While it is within the sound discretion of this court to allow a party to proceed anonymously, Plaintiff should not attempt to utilize that discretion as a shield from legitimate and necessary discovery. Epstein has a fundamental due process right to conduct discovery.
+
+## b. Motion To Identify JANE DOE In Style Of This Case
+
+12. As discussed below, Epstein has fundamental due process right to defend himself in this civil litigation. While JANE DOE travels under a pseudonym, various newspaper articles identifying Epstein have been released discussing the alleged claims against him. Allowing JANE DOE to litigate this matter under a pseudonym is preventing Epstein from defending this suit including, but not limited to, preventing him from locating individuals that may have information about this lawsuit and information about JANE DOE that may discredit her allegations and/or lessen the monetary damages she seeks to recover. It is the undersigned's experience that once identified, witnesses begin to come forward. See supra.
+
+13. In Doe v. Leplev 185 F.R.D. 605 (D. Ct. NV 1999), a sexual harassment case, the court reasoned that there is no express or implied right to bring an action anonymously. Id. at 606. Moreover, Fed. R. Civ. P 10(a) requires that the complaint include the names of the parties. Id. When Plaintiffs are permitted to proceed anonymously, the court must employ a balancing test to decide if the plaintiff has a substantial privacy interest that outweighs the presumption of openness in judicial proceedings. Id., citing, Doe v. M, 951 F.2d 320, 323 (11th Cir. 1992)(requiring complaint to include the names of the parties serves more than administrative convenience, it protects the public's legitimate interests in knowing all the facts involved, including the identity of the parties - thus denying request to proceed anonymously). The factors include:
+
+- a. whether the plaintiff is challenging governmental activity;
+- b. whether the party defending the suit would be prejudiced;
+- c. whether the plaintiff is required to disclose information of utmost intimacy;
+- d. whether the plaintiff is compelled to admit an intention to engage in illegal conduct, thereby risking criminal prosecution;
+- e. whether the Plaintiff would risk suffering injury if identified;
+- f. whether the interests of children are at stake; and
+- g. whether there are less drastic means of protecting the legitimate interests of either party.
+
+Doe v. M, 951 F.2d at 323.
+
+Plaintiff does not fall under any of the factors. Moreover, even if she did meet one of the factors, "[t]he fact that [a] Doe [Plaintiff] may suffer some personal embarrassment, standing alone, does not require the granting of a request to proceed under a pseudonym." Id; see also Doe v. Rostker 89 F.R.D. 159 (N.D. Calif. 1981). Any substantial privacy interests JANE DOE has must outweigh the customary and constitutionally embedded presumption of openness to judicial proceedings. Doe v. 951 F.2d at 323; Doe v. Bergstron, 2009 WL 528623 (C.A.9(Or.))(denying request to proceed anonymously in civil action by Plaintiff where Plaintiffs arrest, prosecution and acquittal were matters of public record).
+
+14. In Sweetland v. State, 535 So.2d 646 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988), the court reasoned that the purpose of discovery is to eliminate the likelihood of surprise and to insure a fair opportunity to prepare for trial. Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280(b)(1)\* see also Surf Drugs. Inc., v. Vermette, 236 So.2d 108, 111 (Fla. 1970)(stating that the rules of discovery should be afforded broad and liberal treatment to effectuate their purpose), citing, Hickman v. Taylor, 329 U.S. 495, 501, 507 (1947).
+
+15. Next, the right to go to court to resolve disputes is a fundamental right. D.R. Lakes, Inc. v. Brandsmart U.S.A. of West Palm Beach, 819 So.2d 971 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). All litigants are afforded an equal opportunity. Lingle v. Dion, 776 So.2d 1073 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). The Florida Constitution establishes the right commonly known as access to courts. Mitchell v. Moore, 786 So.2d 521 (Fla. 2001). Courts shall be open to any person for the redress of any injury and justice shall be administered without sale, denial or delay. Art. I, §21, Fla. Const.; 10A Fla. Jur. 2d, Constitutional Law, §360.
+
+16. If Jane Doe's name is not disclosed and identified, Mr. Epstein will not be afforded his fundamental right to fairly litigate this dispute and prepare for trial.
+
+Accordingly, Epstein requests that JANE DOE be identified by her legal name in the pleadings.
+
+# c. Motion To Identify JANE DOE In Third-Party Subpoenas
+
+17. While discovery in this matter is underway; Epstein is effectively being denied due process rights by Plaintiff's counsel from conducting broad, open and liberal discovery in that Plaintiffs counsel has objected to, among other things, Epstein identifying JANE DOE in various third-party subpoenas to her medical providers and other third parties.
+
+18. The undersigned must serve subpoenas on medical doctors to obtain medical information on JANE DOE's alleged psychological and physical damages as same goes to the heart of Epstein's defenses and Plaintiff's damages. Plaintiff is claiming emotional/psychological damages and "loss of earning capacity.". See Exhibit "A", Interrogatory Response Number 9-10. Therefore, Epstein is entitled to know her psychological condition(s) before and after the alleged incident(s) she references in the Second Amended Complaint. In particular, JANE DOE alleges specific disorders as a result of Epstein's alleged conduct — . .anxiety, depression, suicidal idealization, guilt, self-blame, feeling of being degraded, feeling unattractive, diminished sense of femininity, fluctuations of weight and appetite, sexual intimacy problems, flashbacks. . .stress, irritability, feelings of being isolated and trapped, diminished trust, social problems, problems in personal relationships. . .feel[ings] of stress (particularly around men), obsessive thoughts. . . ." (Emphasis Added). Id. Epstein is also
+
+entitled to know, among other things, whether she had any physical complaints or whether there was ever any evidence of physical battery on JANE DOE's body from the acts she complains of in the 2nd Amended Complaint. The need to serve third-party subpoenas on medical doctors is a basic discovery need related to the claims alleged by JANE DOE for which Plaintiffs counsel refuses to compromise. Balas v. Ruzzo, 703 So.2d 1076 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997), rev. denied, 719 So.2d 286 (Fla. 1998)(discoverability of Plaintiffs history of sexual activity is relevant to damages); United States v. Bear Stops, 997 F.2d 451 (eh Cir. 1993)(deals with "admissibility of other acts of sexual abuse by individuals other than the defendant to explain why a victim of abuse exhibited behavioral manifestations of a sexually abused child.") If Plaintiff saw a psychologist or other physician during or after the time periods she claims she was assaulted by Epstein but either did not discuss or did discuss the incidents (or lack thereof) would be directly relevant to her damage claims. Plaintiff seeks physical and emotional/mental personal injury type damages, and the Epstein must conduct his own discovery thereon. See supra. No valid discovery objections or exemptions exist preventing necessary and reasonable discovery. To hold otherwise prevents Mr. Epstein from preparing and defending this matter.
+
+19. In defending this lawsuit, Mr. Epstein should be permitted broad discovery, whether admissible at trial or not. Fed.R.Civ.Pro. 26 provides, in pertinent part, that "parties may obtain discovery regarding any matter, not privileged, which is relevant to the subject matter involved in the pending action." Plaintiff's counsel's refusal to identify JANE DOE in the third-party subpoenas referenced above is prejudicing Mr. Epstein by virtue of preventing discovery all together, which is in complete contradiction of the discovery rules and Epstein's substantive due process rights.
+
+20. In addition, subpoenas must also be served upon various local and state institutions in order to determine what crimes, if any, JANE DOE has committed (i.e., crimes that involve dishonesty and/or false statement). Obviously, this goes directly to the heart of JANE DOE's damages she claims (". . .anxiety, depression, suicidal idealization, guilt, self-blame, feeling of being degraded, feeling unattractive, diminished sense of femininity, fluctuations of weight and appetite, sexual intimacy problems, flashbacks. . .stress, irritability, feelings of being isolated and trapped, diminished trust, social problems, problems in personal relationships. . .feel[ings) of stress (particularly around men), obsessive thoughts. . . ." — caused by Epstein or other events in her life) for which a jury is entitled to hear about at trial, and certified records must be obtained from the clerk should JANE DOE answer certain questions regarding her crimes incorrectly. See Exhibit "A".
+
+21. At this time, the undersigned is aware that Jane Doe may have committed the following crimes:
+
+- a. Shoplifting;
+- b. Petty Theft; and
+- c. Vandalism;
+
+22. If Jane Doe was involved in crimes, Epstein is entitled to obtain certified copies of those crimes and other crimes Plaintiff may have committed for purposes of discovery and impeachment. Questions will be asked regarding those crimes (e.g., Have you been convicted of a crime of dishonesty or false statement? If so, how many times? Have you been convicted of a felony? If so, how many times?) To hold otherwise would not only prevent broad discovery but would ultimately result in reversible error at any trial.
+
+#### II. Conclusion
+
+- 23. Epstein requests the following relief:
+  - a. That JANE DOE be identified by her legal name in the style of this case;
+  - b. That Epstein be granted leave to identify JANE DOE by her legal name in Third-Party Subpoenas (but not file them in Court or, if required, in a redacted form); and
+  - c. That, on an alternative basis, this court dismiss this action Sua Sponte until such time as JANE DOE identifies herself in the style of this matter. Doe v. Rostker 89 F.R.D.at 163.
+
+WHEREFORE, Epstein, Jeffrey Epstein, respectfully requests that this Court enter said order granting the relief requested above, and for such other and further relief as this Court may deem just and pr
+
+By: ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ.
+
+#### Certificate of Service
+
+I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record identified on the following Service List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on this (p day of May 2009:
+
+Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A. 18205 Biscayne Boulevard
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400
+
+Suite 2218  
+Miami, FL 33160  
+305-931-2200  
+Fax: 305-931-0877  
+[ssm@sexabuseattorney.com](mailto:ssm@sexabuseattorney.com)  
+[ahorowitz@sexabuseattorney.com](mailto:ahorowitz@sexabuseattorney.com)  
+*Counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe #3*
+
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012  
+561-659-8300  
+Fax: 561-835-8691  
+[jagesq@bellsouth.net](mailto:jagesq@bellsouth.net)  
+*Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey  
+Epstein*
+
+![]()![]()
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739850/EFTA02739850.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739850/EFTA02739850.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2886d7f54f8424ef80d3d6ca9371c1dc9ed9a8e7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739850/EFTA02739850.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,653 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739850.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 12,
+  "chars": 18183,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 3.47,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA \nCASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA-IMI",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            197.06400000000002,
+            72.08999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            417.431640625,
+            72.08999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            417.431640625,
+            120.0841064453125
+          ],
+          [
+            197.06400000000002,
+            120.0841064453125
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "MOTION TO COMPEL AND/OR IDENTIFY JANE DOE #3 IN THE STYLE OF \nTHIS CASE AND MOTION TO IDENTIFY JANE DOE IN THIRD-PARTY \nSUBPOENAS FOR PURPOSES OF DISCOVERY, OR ALTERNATIVELY, \nMOTION TO DISMISS SUA SPONTE, WITH INCORPORATED \nMEMORANDUM OF LAW'",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            94.248,
+            257.58
+          ],
+          [
+            519.4954833984375,
+            257.58
+          ],
+          [
+            519.4954833984375,
+            329.04998779296875
+          ],
+          [
+            94.248,
+            329.04998779296875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "I. Motion And Incorporated Memorandum Of Law",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            166.46400000000003,
+            562.14
+          ],
+          [
+            451.96490478515625,
+            562.14
+          ],
+          [
+            451.96490478515625,
+            578.0500030517578
+          ],
+          [
+            166.46400000000003,
+            578.0500030517578
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "a. Background",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            252.144,
+            589.6800000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            365.62689208984375,
+            589.6800000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            365.62689208984375,
+            605.4199981689453
+          ],
+          [
+            252.144,
+            605.4199981689453
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "b. Motion To Identify JANE DOE In Style Of This Case",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            141.372,
+            350.4375
+          ],
+          [
+            475.4012145996094,
+            350.4375
+          ],
+          [
+            475.4012145996094,
+            366.54998779296875
+          ],
+          [
+            141.372,
+            366.54998779296875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "c. Motion To Identify JANE DOE In Third-Party Subpoenas",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            124.848,
+            154.71
+          ],
+          [
+            489.7340087890625,
+            154.71
+          ],
+          [
+            489.7340087890625,
+            171.16998291015625
+          ],
+          [
+            124.848,
+            171.16998291015625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "II. Conclusion",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 10,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            265.608,
+            210.60000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            350.383056640625,
+            210.60000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            350.383056640625,
+            225.91998291015625
+          ],
+          [
+            265.608,
+            225.91998291015625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Certificate of Service",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 10,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            263.15999999999997,
+            542.4374847412109
+          ],
+          [
+            388.9452819824219,
+            542.4374847412109
+          ],
+          [
+            388.9452819824219,
+            557.28
+          ],
+          [
+            263.15999999999997,
+            557.28
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            65
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            32
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            57
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            60
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            71
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            63
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 9,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 10,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            77
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            37
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 11,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739850"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739862/EFTA02739862.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739862/EFTA02739862.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..266e9cdb0801ad4e0bd4065164cbcd277917b495
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739862/EFTA02739862.md
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+## MERMELSTEIN & HOROWITZ pA
+
+AI N EY S AI LAW
+
+March 3, 2009
+
+## Via Facsimile
+
+Robert D. Critton, Jr., Esq. Burman, Critton, Luther & Coleman 515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+
+Stuart S. Mennelstein Tel 305.931.2200 Fax 305.931.0877 ssm@sexabuseattomey.com
+
+18205 Biscayne Blvd. Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160 VAVW.sexabuseattomey.com
+
+Re: Jane Does 2-7 v. Jefj5-ey Epstein
+
+Dear Mr. Critton:
+
+This letter addresses the matters raised in your letter dated February 25, 2009, as follows:
+
+- 1. The Plaintiffs agree to withdraw the General Objections set forth in their interrogatory responses.
+- 2. The Plaintiffs' responses to interrogatory no. 10 provide as much information as is available to them at this time. Further specificity regarding the amounts of damages claimed will necessarily be the subject of expert testimony. Plaintiffs do not have this information. By their nature, these are not breach of contract or commercial cases in which damages are easily calculated.
+- 3. As to interrogatories nos. 18-21 and document request nos. 10, 11, 17 and 18, Plaintiffs maintain their objections as stated. It is the Plaintiffs' position that you are not entitled to discovery from the Plaintiffs, either in interrogatories, documents requests or depositions, relating to other sexual behavior not involving Mr. Epstein. Your interrogatories and document requests are squarely at odds with the purpose and intent of Fed.R.Evid. 412. In this regard the Comment to the 1994 Amendments to Rule 412 states as follows:
+
+Rule 412 applies to both civil and criminal proceeding. The rule aims to safeguard the alleged victim against the invasion of privacy, potential embarrassment and sexual stereotyping that is associated with public disclosure of intimate sexual details and the
+
+Robert Critton, Esq. March 3, 2009 Page 2
+
+> infusion of sexual innuendo into the factfinding process. By affording victims protection in most instances, the rule also encourages victims of sexual misconduct to institute and to participate in legal proceedings against alleged offenders.
+
+If Rule 412 is to have any meaning, then the protections it affords to victims of sexual misconduct must be considered and applied in discovery proceedings as well as the trial.
+
+4. We disagree that the Plaintiffs' answers to request for production no. 14 is evasive. How would any of the Plaintiffs' know whether photographs and pictures taken of Mr. Epstein or Mr. Epstein's home exist? All they are required to do in response to document requests is produce those documents that are responsive and that are in their possession, custody or control. As we believe it is made clear, none of the Plaintiffs have any documents that are responsive to request no. 14.
+
+5. As to Request for Production no. 1, you state in your letter that tax returns are relevant to "whether Plaintiff has been and continues to be gainfully employed" and "the type of employment in which Plaintiff engaged in." In a separate interrogatory, you request the Plaintiffs' complete employment history. Additionally, we have advised you that the Plaintiffs do not make any claims for lost wages. As a result, we do not understand your argument that the Plaintiffs' tax returns are relevant. Clearly, the discovery you seek on employment history can and should be obtained in a more direct means than through the Plaintiff's tax returns, which necessarily include information that is private and not relevant.
+
+As to the matters discussed above that are in dispute, please be advised that we will oppose any motion to compel and any request by Defendant for expenses and attorneys' fees.
+
+Very truly urs
+
+tuart S. elstein
+
+SSMilr
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739862/EFTA02739862.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739862/EFTA02739862.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bcc2d262164f50f3292162ab6354e1c71f44f7d1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739862/EFTA02739862.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,151 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739862.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 2,
+  "chars": 3696,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.02,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "MERMELSTEIN & HOROWITZ pA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            74.78599999999999,
+            77.66986083984375
+          ],
+          [
+            378.6148681640625,
+            77.66986083984375
+          ],
+          [
+            378.6148681640625,
+            100.19647216796875
+          ],
+          [
+            74.78599999999999,
+            100.19647216796875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Via Facsimile",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            72.33399999999999,
+            240.05599999999998
+          ],
+          [
+            151.29983520507812,
+            240.05599999999998
+          ],
+          [
+            151.29983520507812,
+            255.49200439453125
+          ],
+          [
+            72.33399999999999,
+            255.49200439453125
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            79
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            39
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            59
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            30
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            9
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739862"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739864/EFTA02739864.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739864/EFTA02739864.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0930af97dfd4d27838454d8c6456bd0796498ca1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739864/EFTA02739864.md
@@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 2,
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 4, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 5, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80381-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MAR
+
+JANE DOE NO. 6, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80994-MARRa
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 7, CASE NO.: 08- 80993-CIV-MARRa
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## PLAINTIFFS' MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSE TO FIRST REQUEST TO PRODUCE, OVERRULE OBJECTIONS AND FOR AN AWARD OF REASONABLE EXPENSES
+
+Plaintiffs, JANE DOES 2-7, by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby file this Memorandum in Opposition to Epstein's Motion to Compel Response to First Request to Produce, Overrule Objections, and for an Award of Reasonable Expenses, and state as follows:
+
+# I. Introduction
+
+Defendant Epstein served a Request for Production, which includes (Request #s 10, 11, 17 and 18) requests that seek to unearth all recordings and depictions of every instance of sexual conduct and activity which each Jane Doe might have engaged and documents evidencing the names and contact information of each sexual partner over the past nine years. Plaintiffs properly objected to these Requests, in that discovery on the sexual history of a childhood abuse victim is substantially limited in federal court; "courts should presumptively issue protective
+
+orders barring discovery unless the party seeking discovery makes a showing that the evidence sought to be discovered would be relevant under the facts and theories of the particular case and cannot be obtained except through discovery." See Fed. R. Evid. 412, Advisory Committee Notes to 1994 Amendments, subdivision (c). Defendant has made no such showing in his Motion to Compel to overcome this presumption. Accordingly, Defendant's Motion to Compel must be denied in its entirety.
+
+Defendant also seeks in Request #1 "all tax returns and supporting documentation" dating back to 2002. Plaintiffs properly objected to this harassing and burdensome request, which is not reasonably calculated to lead to admissible evidence in the present sexual abuse case, particularly since Plaintiffs are not making a lost wages or lost income claim. Plaintiffs have already disclosed their entire employment history and the request at issue is far broader than necessary to determine Plaintiffs' employment or earnings history.
+
+# II. Argument
+
+Initially, it must be brought to the Court's attention that Epstein's request for depictions or recordings of the plaintiff engaged in sexual or simulated sexual activity since the year 2000 includes materials which are unlawful for anyone to possess, particularly a registered sex offender such as Epstein. The notion that a registered sex offender is seeking child pornography should disturb this Court as much as it irks the Plaintiffs.
+
+Epstein incorrectly argues that Fed.R.Evid 412 is strictly an evidentiary rule and that Rule 26(b) must be read exclusively to determine whether information about an abuse victim's sexual history is discoverable. The Rule 412 Advisory Committee Notes, however, instruct that Rule 412 affects not only the admissibility of evidence at trial, but must also "inform the discovery process." Barta v. City and County of Honolulu, 169 F.R.D. 132 (D. Haw. 19%). The Committee Notes state, in relevant pan, as follows:
+
+Courts should presumptively issue protective orders barring discovery unless the party seeking discovery makes a showing that the evidence sought to be discovered would be relevant under the facts and theories of the particular case and cannot be obtained except through discovery.
+
+Nowhere in Defendant's Motion is it explained how or why this presumption should be overcome. It is well established under Fed.R.Evid. 412 that a victim's past sexual behavior is wholly irrelevant to the credibility of her testimony, and that her prior and subsequent sexual activity with third parties has no bearing on the issue of whether she consented to or complied with the sexual acts charged. See United States v. 472 F.2d 909, 919 (5th Cir. 1973); Virgin Islands=1, 634 F.Supp. 933, 936-37 (D. V.I. 1986) (policy of rule disallowing evidence to show character of assault victim); Dept. of Professional Regulation v. Wise 575 So.2d 713 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991) (holding that evidence of sexual relations with a person other than an accused is not relevant). One commentator has noted that once the identity of persons and similarity of circumstances are removed, "probative value all but disappears." Ordover, Admissibility of Patterns of Similar Sexual Conduct: The Unlamented Death of Character for Chastity, 63 Cornell L. Rev. 96, 106 (1977). The discovery at issue is not limited to sexual contact involving similar circumstances, and is therefore lacking in probative value. Defendant fails in his Motion to demonstrate otherwise.
+
+Defendant's argument that Rule 412 is merely an evidentiary rule that should be disregarded in discovery disputes has been routinely rejected in federal courts. See, e.g., Barta v. City and County of Honolulu 169 F.R.D. 132 (D. Haw. 1996) (granting protective order pursuant to Rule 412 to prevent a sexual battery and harassment victim from having to disclose off-duty sexual contacts with persons other than defendant in discovery); Herron v. Eastern
+
+Industries. Inc. 2007 WL 2781211 (N.D. Ha. Sept. 19, 2007); Gibbons v. Food Lion, Inc. 1999 WL 33226474 (M.D. Fla. Feb. 19, 1999)• P.J. Herchenroeder v. John Univ. Applied Physical Lab, 171 F.RD. 179 (D. Md. 1997) (looking at both Rule 26 and Rule 412 in resolving discovery motion); v. Zabihi, 166 F.R.D. 500 (D. N.M. 19%) (explaining that "[ajlthough the present motion arises in the context of discovery under Rule 26, the Court must remain mindful of Rule 412 and its implications); Stalnaker v. Kmart Corp. 1996 WL 397563 (D. Kan. 1996) (noting that Rule 412 "is applicable and has significance in deciding certain discovery motions").
+
+As the above-referenced cases make abundantly clear, childhood sexual abuse cases are not garden-variety litigation subject to traditional broad discovery concerning a victim's sexual history. Rule 412 is designed to protect victims of sexual misconduct from undue embarrassment and intrusion into their private affairs. See Fed R.Evid. 412. The committee notes explain that the Rule is also intended to prevent "sexual stereotyping that is associated with public disclosure of intimate sexual details and the infusion of sexual innuendo into the factfinding process." Rule 412 Advisory Committee Notes to 1994 Amendments. Common sense dictates that requiring a sexual abuse victim to disclose the intimate details and recordings sought by Epstein during the discovery process — which then would presumably lead to additional discovery of the victim's other sexual partners — would be at least as embarrassing and intrusive during the discovery process as it would be if the victim were questioned about these facts at trial, if not more. Thus, in order to carry out its purpose, Rule 412 "must inform the discovery process" and the Court "must impose certain restriction on discovery to preclude inquiry into areas which will clearly fail to satisfy the balancing test" set forth in Rule 412. See Barta v. City and County of Honolulu, 169 F.R.D. at 135.
+
+In Barta the Court confronted this issue in the context of a discovery motion in a civil case. 169 F.R.D. at 133. A former employee brought a sexual harassment and battery claim against her former employer and individual employees. Id. The defendants asked questions at deposition which delved into the plaintiff's sexual conduct outside the workplace. Id. at 134. The Court did not allow these questions and wait until trial to determine admissibility. Id. at 135. Instead, the Court sustained the plaintiff's objections. Id. The Court based its decision on Fed.R.Evid. 412. Id. Although noting that Rule 412 controls the admissibility of evidence, the Court explained that it must also apply Rule 412 to "impose certain restrictions on discovery to preclude inquiry into areas which will clearly satisfy the balancing test of 4 I 2(b)(2)..." Id. Thus, the Court concluded that the defendants should not be permitted to inquire into the plaintiffs conduct while she was off-duty, outside the workplace, and which did not involve the same defendants. The same rationale should apply here. The Defendant should not be permitted to seek intimate details and recordings of Plaintiff's sexual conduct throughout her life.
+
+Defendant attached three Florida state court orders to its Motion, two of which are trial court decisions. These cases do not serve as precedent for this Court, and in any event, they are not persuasive. Unlike state courts, federal courts must focus on the interplay between Fed.R.Evid. 412 and Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(b), and in this regard must be concerned with embarrassment to the victim and protection of her privacy. Indeed, it does not appear that an analogous argument was made in any of the state court cases relied upon by Defendant. Furthermore, the discovery in Balas v. Russo, 703 So.2d 1076 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) was far narrower than that which is at issue here. It was limited to asking plaintiffs for their employment history (which admittedly included prostitution), employment records, electronic recording of the conduct which was the subject of the complaint, and a description of her damages. 703 So.2d
+
+1077-78. At no time were the plaintiffs in Balas asked to disclose their entire sexually history beginning at age 10. Id. Thus, the three state court cases cited in the Motion are not helpful to the Defendant, and should not deflect attention from the burden placed on the party in federal court seeking discovery of a victim's other sexual contacts.
+
+With regard to Request #1 for "all tax returns and supporting documentation", the Defendant has not (and cannot) show how these documents are conceivably relevant. Plaintiffs are not making a claim for lost income or wages. See Exhibit "A". Moreover, Plaintiffs have disclosed their entire employment history and agreed to execute authorizations allowing Defendant to obtain their employment personnel records. Given the nature of the claim involving sexual assault, it is inconceivable how the tax returns, W-2s, and 1099s, and all other "supporting documentation" could be relevant. Cases in which the plaintiff has been ordered to produce tax returns is limited to situations involving transactions or in which the plaintiff is seeking to recover lost wages, lost profits, royalty payments, or similar relief. See Bellose v. Universal Tile Restoration 2008 WL 2620735 (S.D. Fla. June 30, 2008)• United States v. Certain Real Property ,444 F.Supp.2d 1258 (S.D. Fla. 2006). The instant case involving sexual assault is readily distinguishable and the mere filing of a lawsuit does not place all of one's income and earnings at issue. Further, if it is Plaintiff's employment history or earnings that Defendants are seeking to discover, a request for all "supporting documentation" pertaining to their tax returns is overbroad and far more burdensome than necessary to acquire this information.
+
+Finally, Defendant's request for attorney's fees and costs is completely unwarranted. The present motion and response involve good-faith, timely and well-founded objections by Plaintiffs to over-reaching and harassing discovery efforts. Accordingly, Defendant's request for award of reasonable expenses should be denied.
+
+# Conclusion
+
+Based on the foregoing, Plaintiffs respectfully request that Defendant's Motion to Compel Response to First Request to Produce, Overrule Objections, and for an Award of Reasonable Expenses be denied in their entirety.
+
+Dated: May 6, 2009 Respectfully submitted,
+
+By: s/ Adam D. Horowitz Stuart S. Mermelstein (FL Bar No. 947245) ssm@sexabuseattorney.com Adam D. Horowitz (FL Bar No. 376980) ahorowitz@sexabuseattorney.com MERMELSTEIN & HOROWITZ, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiffs 18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160 Tel: (305) 931-2200 Fax: (305) 931-0877
+
+#### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
+
+I hereby certify that on May 6, 2009, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day to all parties on the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those parties who are not authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing.
+
+/s/ Adam D. Horowitz
+
+## SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. iaoldberger@agwpa.com
+
+Robert D. Critton, Esq. rcritton@bcIclaw.com
+
+/s/ Adam D. Horowitz
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739864/EFTA02739864.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739864/EFTA02739864.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6c02c887b9a5dea77821d89c2a0ceecddb9cbaf9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739864/EFTA02739864.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,550 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739864.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 10,
+  "chars": 13115,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.81,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            408.26995849609375,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            408.26995849609375,
+            100.10302734375
+          ],
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            100.10302734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "PLAINTIFFS' MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO \nCOMPEL RESPONSE TO FIRST REQUEST TO PRODUCE, OVERRULE \nOBJECTIONS AND FOR AN AWARD OF REASONABLE EXPENSES",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            89.352,
+            374.22
+          ],
+          [
+            523.6605224609375,
+            374.22
+          ],
+          [
+            523.6605224609375,
+            417.363037109375
+          ],
+          [
+            89.352,
+            417.363037109375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "I. Introduction",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            252.144,
+            512.73
+          ],
+          [
+            360.2470703125,
+            512.73
+          ],
+          [
+            360.2470703125,
+            527.6835327148438
+          ],
+          [
+            252.144,
+            527.6835327148438
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "II. Argument",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            260.1,
+            401.76
+          ],
+          [
+            355.0387878417969,
+            401.76
+          ],
+          [
+            355.0387878417969,
+            417.06353759765625
+          ],
+          [
+            260.1,
+            417.06353759765625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Conclusion",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            274.176,
+            98.82
+          ],
+          [
+            338.6424865722656,
+            98.82
+          ],
+          [
+            338.6424865722656,
+            113.68353271484375
+          ],
+          [
+            274.176,
+            113.68353271484375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            227.66400000000002,
+            72.08999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            386.50201416015625,
+            72.08999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            386.50201416015625,
+            85.863037109375
+          ],
+          [
+            227.66400000000002,
+            85.863037109375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "SERVICE LIST \nDOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN \nUnited States District Court, Southern District of Florida",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 9,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            156.67200000000003,
+            70.47
+          ],
+          [
+            455.16455078125,
+            70.47
+          ],
+          [
+            455.16455078125,
+            113.9830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            156.67200000000003,
+            113.9830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            20
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            67
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            68
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            60
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            55
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            39
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            20
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            19
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 9,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            22
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            11
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739864"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739874/EFTA02739874.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739874/EFTA02739874.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3196fc7cc0f58b0bf024dd1d01c060f31b2897c4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739874/EFTA02739874.md
@@ -0,0 +1,122 @@
+### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff, v.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+#### DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR ORDER REQUIRING THAT PLAINTIFF USE PROPER CASE STYLE IN ALL FILINGS
+
+Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, by and through his undersigned counsel, moves this Court for the entry of an order requiring that the Plaintiff in the above-styled action use the proper case-style in all filings in this action, as opposed to improperly including all other Jane Does, (Jane Doe No. 2, Jane Doe No. 3, Jane Doe No. 4, Jane Doe No. 5, Jane Doe No. 6, and Jane Doe No. 7), who are represented by the same counsel. Rule 10(a), Fed.R.Civ.P. (2009), Loc. Gen. Rule 7.1 (S.D. Fla. 2009). In support of his motion, Defendant states:
+
+- 1. Rule 10(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, pertaining to "Caption; Names of Parties," provides that —
+
+Every pleading must have a caption with the court's name, a title, a file number, and a Rule 7(a) designation. The title of the complaint must name all the parties; the title of other pleadings, after naming the first party on each side, may refer generally to other parties.
+
+- 2. Attached hereto as Exhibit A is the case style which Plaintiff recently used in filing papers with this Court. This action has not been consolidated with any of the other
+
+Jane Doe No. 3 v. Epstein Page 2
+
+Jane Doe actions filed by Plaintiff's counsel. Rule 10(a) makes clear that only the parties to this action are to be included in the caption.
+
+3. By including case styles from five additional cases makes it appear as though the cases have been consolidated. Further, the case style used by Plaintiff is not only misleading, but confusing in that there is no clear delineation as to in which action the matter is properly filed. Each case has different facts and should proceed on those facts. Each Plaintiff is claiming personal injury type damages which must be decided separately.
+
+4. Accordingly, Defendant is entitled to an order requiring that Plaintiff uses the proper caption and case style in this action and not list every case in which her counsel represents other Jane Does.
+
+WHEREFORE, Defendant respectfully requests that this Court grant Defendant's motion, and enter the requested order.
+
+### Rule 7.1 Certification
+
+Pursuant to letter communication, Plaintiffs counsel did not agree with the relief request in Defendant's motion.
+
+Ro e Critlon, Jr. Attorney for Epstein
+
+### Certificate of Service
+
+I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record identified on the following Service List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on this 1 1, day of May 2009:
+
+Jane Doe No. 3 v. Epstein  
+Page 3
+
+Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq.  
+Adam D. Horowitz, Esq.  
+Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A.  
+18205 Biscayne Boulevard  
+Suite 2218  
+Miami, FL 33160  
+305-931-2200  
+Fax: 305-931-0877  
+[ssm@sexabuseattorney.com](mailto:ssm@sexabuseattorney.com)  
+[ahorowitz@sexabuseattorney.com](mailto:ahorowitz@sexabuseattorney.com)  
+*Counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe #3*
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger  
+Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.  
+250 Australian Avenue South  
+Suite 1400  
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012  
+561-659-8300  
+Fax: 561-835-8691  
+[jagesq@bellsouth.net](mailto:jagesq@bellsouth.net)  
+*Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein*
+
+![]()![]()
+
+# UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRAMMI
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA/JOHNSON
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 4,
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant.
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRA/JOHNSON
+
+JANE DOE NO. 5, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80381-
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant.
+
+" EXHIBIT fr
+
+JANE DOE NO. 6, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80994-MARRA/
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 7, CASE NO.: 08- 80993-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## PLAINTIFFS' MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STAY AND OR CONTINUE ACTION
+
+Plaintiffs, JANE DOES 2-7, by and through undersigned counsel, file this Memorandum in Opposition to Stay and or Continue Action, as follows:
+
+#### I. Introduction
+
+In moving for stay, Defendant has the burden of demonstrating that, due to aparallel criminal proceeding, if he exercises his right against self incrimination he will certainly lose on summary judgment unless a stay is granted. Defendant has failed to satisfy this burden. There is no pending motion for summary judgment. There is also no criminal proceeding at this time arising from Epstein's acts against the Plaintiffs or other victims. Indeed, whether such acriminal proceeding is ever commenced is entirely within the Defendant's control, by complying with the terms of his Non-Prosecution Agreement with the U.S. Attorney's Office. Defendant relies upon an amorphous
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739874/EFTA02739874.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739874/EFTA02739874.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2e942e725cc600a1060b237aa96776f272e035e7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739874/EFTA02739874.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,372 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739874.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 5,
+  "chars": 5066,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 3.98,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            202.572,
+            85.05
+          ],
+          [
+            411.6499938964844,
+            85.05
+          ],
+          [
+            411.6499938964844,
+            114.17999267578125
+          ],
+          [
+            202.572,
+            114.17999267578125
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR ORDER REQUIRING \nTHAT PLAINTIFF USE PROPER CASE STYLE IN ALL FILINGS",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            143.82,
+            304.6875
+          ],
+          [
+            472.00238037109375,
+            304.6875
+          ],
+          [
+            472.00238037109375,
+            332.79998779296875
+          ],
+          [
+            143.82,
+            332.79998779296875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Rule 7.1 Certification",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            249.696,
+            462.5675048828125
+          ],
+          [
+            365.8240661621094,
+            462.5675048828125
+          ],
+          [
+            365.8240661621094,
+            477.17999267578125
+          ],
+          [
+            249.696,
+            477.17999267578125
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Certificate of Service",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            245.412,
+            613.3074951171875
+          ],
+          [
+            370.9054260253906,
+            613.3074951171875
+          ],
+          [
+            370.9054260253906,
+            627.9199981689453
+          ],
+          [
+            245.412,
+            627.9199981689453
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            209.91600000000003,
+            100.44
+          ],
+          [
+            403.5251159667969,
+            100.44
+          ],
+          [
+            403.5251159667969,
+            130.8170166015625
+          ],
+          [
+            209.91600000000003,
+            130.8170166015625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "PLAINTIFFS' MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION \nTO MOTION TO STAY AND OR CONTINUE ACTION",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            151.164,
+            387.18
+          ],
+          [
+            438.2193603515625,
+            387.18
+          ],
+          [
+            438.2193603515625,
+            416.9368591308594
+          ],
+          [
+            151.164,
+            416.9368591308594
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "I. Introduction",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            241.74,
+            481.14
+          ],
+          [
+            344.8954162597656,
+            481.14
+          ],
+          [
+            344.8954162597656,
+            495.053955078125
+          ],
+          [
+            241.74,
+            495.053955078125
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            58
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            9
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            59
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            29
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            17
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            227
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739874"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739879/EFTA02739879.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739879/EFTA02739879.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1b2ac59b302893a7d701d92a5fe888249a3f498d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739879/EFTA02739879.md
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
+#### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRAa
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+v.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's Reply to Plaintiffs Response In Opposition To Defendant's Motion To Stay And/Or Continue Action For Time Certain With Incorporated Memorandum Of Law
+
+Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, (hereinafter "EPSTEIN") by and through his undersigned attorneys, hereby files his Reply to Plaintiff's Response In Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Stay and/or Continue Action, and states:
+
+## I. Introduction and Argument
+
+Plaintiffs Response in Opposition challenging the stay should not prevail when <sup>5</sup>th Amendment principles are at issue and when there exists a real, substantial and not remote possibility that Epstein may face criminal prosecution by the United States Attorneys' Office ("USAO") if the USAO unilaterally determines that Epstein somehow violated that certain Non-Prosecution Agreement dated June 30, 2008 ("NPA") and/or if Epstein is forced to waive those 5th Amendment rights and participate in civil discovery in order to defend this civil action.
+
+Epstein should not be confronted with the substantial risk of loosing this civil action by virtue of asserting his 5th Amendment privileges. Despite Plaintiff's contention,
+
+Epstein's Motion does not concentrate solely on the fact that the pleadings are not at the summary judgment stage. The motion also concentrates on Epstein's risk of loosing this entire civil action as a result of Epstein invoking his 5th Amendment rights. Severino v. Klvtie's Developments, Inc., <sup>2008</sup>WL 1782637, \*2 (D. Colo)(recognizing that a stay is appropriate under similar circumstances as in the instant case); see also infra.
+
+In fact, waiver of Epstein's 5u' Amendment privileges should not be compelled to defend this civil action (and could be remedied by areasonable stay), especially when civil discovery may lead to the USAO unilaterally declaring aviolation of the NPA.
+
+The USAO has already unilaterally claimed that EPSTEIN violated the NPA by, among other things, "investigating the Plaintiffs (by and though his attorneys) whom brought civil suits against him for purposes of defending those civil actions" and "by contesting damages in this action and in the other civil actions." See Motion to Stay and Jack Goldberger Affidavit attached thereto as Exhibit "B". Thus, these are not vague assertions as Plaintiff claims. How can Epstein truly defend these matters and be afforded his due process rights when to do so might result in the USAO claiming abreach of the NPA? The fact is that he cannot. Notwithstanding the allegations against Epstein, this Court has an obligation to ensure his due process rights are upheld in both the civil and criminal contexts.
+
+Next, in her response, Plaintiff claims that a stay should not be entered because <sup>a</sup>parallel criminal proceeding against Epstein does not exist. Not only is Plaintiffs theory incorrect for reasons set out herein and in the Epstein's Motion to Stay, but her response ignores the significant fact that a stay may be issued in light of an ongoing
+
+investigation. It is clear from the NPA and Jack Goldberger's Affidavit (attached to the Motion to Stay) ". . .that the criminal matters against Epstein remain ongoing until the NPA expires by its terms in late 2010. . ., and the threat of criminal prosecution against Epstein by the USAO continues presently and through late 2010." See Jack Goldberger's Affidavit, ¶5 (attached to the Motion to Stay). In fact, the FBI refused to provide information regarding this case and other related cases filed against Epstein ". . .stating the materials are at this time exempt from disclosure because they are in an investigative file, i.e., the matter is still an ongoing criminal investigation." See Jack Goldberger's Affidavit, ¶7 (attached to the Motion to Stay)
+
+Additionally, Plaintiffs response downplays the fact that civil discovery may result in the USAO claiming abreach of the NPA. Epstein wishes to vigorously defend this case and others filed against him; however, he does not wish to risk waiver of his 5th Amendment privileges, at least before the NPA expires or any investigation is closed.
+
+Further, Plaintiff adopts the arguments set forth in Jane Doe's Response to the Motion to Stay filed in 08-CIV-80893, which asserts that the NPA is not attached to Epstein's Motion to Stay. The Court has a copy of the NPA. While it may be sealed, this Court may review same, in camera. As such, Plaintiffs Best Evidence argumen<sup>t</sup> (as adopted in the instant response) is entirely misplaced and should be disregarded.
+
+### a. Justice Requires The Entry of A Stay
+
+As set out in the Motion to Stay, once the NPA expires, EPSTEIN intends to testify to all relevant and non-objectionable inquiries made to him in discovery be it <sup>a</sup> deposition, in interrogatories or in production requests. However, the current
+
+circumstances are such that by testifying or responding to discovery, EPSTEIN will be required to waive his constitutional privileges, thereby subjecting himself to scrutiny by the USAO as a result of matters alleged in this civil action (and others before this Court and in the State of Florida 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County).
+
+When an ongoing criminal investigation exists, courts have granted motions to stay civil proceedings. In St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company v. U.S., <sup>24</sup>CI.Ct 513(1991), the court held that staying acivil action for 6-9 months was reasonable in light of a pending criminal investigation so long as the movant met certain elements (see infra) and the stay was not immoderate or unreasonable. Taking into consideration the Motion to Stay and this Reply as well as facts alleged by Plaintiff in her operative pleading against Epstein, it is clear that Epstein has met the elements of St. Paul Fire necessary for this Court to enter a stay:
+
+- 1. Epstein has made a clear showing, by direct or indirect proof, that the issues in the civil action are "related" as well as "substantially similar" to the issues in the criminal investigation.
+- 2. Epstein has made a clear showing of hardship or inequity if required to go forward with this civil case while the NPA and/or the ongoing investigation exist. (see supra and see also Motion to Stay and attached affidavit of Jack Goldberger, Esq. discussing Epstein's 5th Amendment Rights and how those rights affect this civil litigation — see supra); and
+- 3. Epstein, in light of the stays granted by other courts, has shown that a stay in the instant matter until late 2010 (the date the NPA expires) and the likely date any ongoing investigation will be closed is not immoderate or unreasonable.
+
+St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company v. U.S., <sup>24</sup>CI.Ct at 515-16; see also Wilson v. National Association of Letter Carriers, <sup>2006</sup>WL 3791313, \*1 (E.D. La.
+
+2006)(granting motion to stay civil proceeding for 2 years and 7 months pending criminal investigation); Ostrow v. U.S., <sup>1986</sup>WL 6855, \*1 (M.D. Fla.)(recognizing <sup>a</sup> defendant's constitutional rights and allowing for a stay of the civil case until the criminal aspects/investigation of Defendant's companion case are closed).
+
+Here, Epstein is not required to "contemplate an in haec verba iron-clad comparison of separate issues by direct proof." St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company v. U.S., <sup>24</sup>CI.Ct at 516. Instead, a reading of the complaint, the NPA (in camera), the pleadings in support of and against Epstein's Motion to Stay along with other pleadings in the clerk's file, makes it clear that the facts in the instant matter and those in the ongoing investigation are "related" and/or "substantially similar." Id. As such, permitting this civil action to go forward would create a hardship on Epstein in that he will be forced to invoke his 5th Amendment Privilege and risk loosing this case by virtue of not being able to present evidence, or waive that right and risk a potential criminal prosecution. Eastwood v. U.S., <sup>2008</sup>WL 5412857, \*1 (E.D. Tenn.))("When <sup>a</sup> party to a civil action is subject to criminal proceedings and/or investigations that relate to such civil action, courts will often stay the civil proceeding so as to prevent the use of civil discovery and evidentiary procedures to obtain evidence for use in the criminal matter). Id. Courts will also stay acivil case to preserve 5th Amendment rights. Id. Further, a comparison of Fed.R.Civ. Pro. 26 may expand the rights of criminal discovery beyond the limits of Fed.R.Crim.Pro. 16(b). Epstein satisfies the requirements to stay this action as set forth in St. Paul Fire and in Eastwood, including the similarity of issues underlying the civil litigation and ongoing criminal investigation. As such, a stay should
+
+be entered in the instant matter. See also U.S. v. \$75,020.00 In United States Funds, et al., 2009 WL 1010359 (M.D. G.a. 2009).
+
+# Ill. Conclusion and Request for Relief
+
+Based upon the foregoing, Epstein is entitled to a full stay of this proceeding (and other related matters) until such time as the NPA expires and until the ongoing investigation by the USAO is closed (i.e., until late 2010). Alternatively, in an effort to protect Epstein's 5th Amendment and his due process rights in connection with defending these civil matters, this court should enter a stay of any discovery directed to Epstein and strike this case from the trial docket until the NPA and the ongoing investigation are both concluded and/or expired. In this manner, Plaintiffs investigation and discovery as to third parties will continue and will not be delayed. Epstein is invoking his 5th Amendment rights in the first place, which means that objections to discovery and deposition questions are being asserted so as not to waive those 5th Amendment rights. Once the NPA and the ongoing investigation terminate, this court could allow additional time for Plaintiff to complete Epstein's deposition and discovery directed to him, and then set this case on the Court% most available docket. Despite Plaintiffs contentions, Epstein's 5th Amendment rights and his due process rights associated therewith and in connection with defending this civil case should trump any civil claim for money damages when it comes to timing. Eastwood v. U.S., <sup>2008</sup>WL 5412857, \*6 (reasoning that a stay is warranted when the risk to an individual's constitutional rights is magnified).
+
+WHEREFORE, Epstein requests the following relief orth above, and for such other and further relief as this court deems just and
+
+> Ro=hrt D Critton, Jr. Attorney or Defendant Epstein
+
+#### Certificate of Service
+
+<sup>I</sup>HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record identified on the following Service List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on this ay of May, 2009:
+
+Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A. 18205 Biscayne Boulevard Suite 2218 Miami, FL 33160 305-931-2200 Fax: 305-931-0877 ssm@sexabuseattornev.conn ahorowitz@sexabuseattomev.com Counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe #2
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 561-659-8300 Fax: 561-835-8691 iaqesci@bellsouth.net Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
+
+Respectfully
+
+By: ROBE TTOfjI, JR., ESQ. Flori Bar No. 2241 rcritebciclaw.com MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 mpikeebciclaw.com BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN 515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561/842-2820 Phone 561/515-3148 Fax (Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein)
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739879/EFTA02739879.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739879/EFTA02739879.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2dbd268d186ff5fc2d57fa06b149db7ec1e7e6d7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739879/EFTA02739879.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,402 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739879.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 7,
+  "chars": 11917,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.46,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            200.73600000000002,
+            95.58
+          ],
+          [
+            411.3888244628906,
+            95.58
+          ],
+          [
+            411.3888244628906,
+            124.47113037109375
+          ],
+          [
+            200.73600000000002,
+            124.47113037109375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "I. Introduction and Argument",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            211.75199999999995,
+            437.40000000000003
+          ],
+          [
+            410.4981384277344,
+            437.40000000000003
+          ],
+          [
+            410.4981384277344,
+            453.1850891113281
+          ],
+          [
+            211.75199999999995,
+            453.1850891113281
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "a. Justice Requires The Entry of A Stay",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            189.72,
+            614.79
+          ],
+          [
+            440.91064453125,
+            614.79
+          ],
+          [
+            440.91064453125,
+            629.3927001953125
+          ],
+          [
+            189.72,
+            629.3927001953125
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Ill. Conclusion and Request for Relief",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            214.2,
+            171.71999999999997
+          ],
+          [
+            438.96331787109375,
+            171.71999999999997
+          ],
+          [
+            438.96331787109375,
+            189.14263916015625
+          ],
+          [
+            214.2,
+            189.14263916015625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Certificate of Service",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            263.772,
+            230.03999999999996
+          ],
+          [
+            390.97039794921875,
+            230.03999999999996
+          ],
+          [
+            390.97039794921875,
+            244.2242431640625
+          ],
+          [
+            263.772,
+            244.2242431640625
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            234
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            352
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            361
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            401
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            31
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            380
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            322
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            261
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            47
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739879"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739886/EFTA02739886.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739886/EFTA02739886.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..49ffd32f70f0a71f8f3b18723a0eea15c182af94
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739886/EFTA02739886.md
@@ -0,0 +1,164 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 2,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA
+
+/
+
+JANE DOE NO. 4,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRA,
+
+JANE DOE NO. 5, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80381-
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 6,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 7,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+CASE NO.: 08-80994-CIV-MARRA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-80993-CIV-MARRA
+
+C.M.A., CASE NO.: 08-8081 I -CIV-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE, CASE NO.: 08- 80893-CIV-MARRA/
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+VS.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN et al,
+
+Defendants.
+
+DOE II, CASE NO.: 09- 80469-CIV-MARRA/
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN et al,
+
+Defendants.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 101, CASE NO.: 09- 80591-CTV-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+/
+
+JANE DOE NO. 102 CASE NO.: 09- 80656-CIV-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES FOR PURPOSES OF DISCOVERY AND PROCEDURAL MOTIONS THAT RELATE TO MULTIPLE CASES
+
+THIS CAUSE is before the Court sua sponte. In the interests of judicial economy and
+
+efficiency, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:
+
+I. The above-styled cases are hereby CONSOLIDATED for purposes of discovery and for procedural motions that relate to multiple cases.
+
+2. Hereinafter, all motions and other court filings that relate to discovery and all procedural motions that relate to multiple cases shall be styled with all of the case names and numbers, consistent with the styling of this Order, and shall be FILED ONLY IN Jane Doe No. 2 v. Epstein, case no. 08-80119, which is the lowest-numbered pending case. Any motions styled incorrectly or filed in multiple cases will be stricken from the docket for failure to follow the Court's Order.
+
+3. The parties may file separate motions to dismiss, answers to the complaint, summary judgment motions, motions in limine and other substantive motions that pertain to their individual cases and their individual trials under their individual case styles.
+
+4. Production of documents by any party or non-party that relate to multiple cases need be produced only once.
+
+5. Defendant is limited to a single deposition of each Plaintiff, during which Defendant may depose the Plaintiff as both a party and a witness.
+
+6. Defendant(s) may be deposed only once.
+
+7. Any other witnesses common to multiple cases may be deposed only once.
+
+8. For depositions, Local Rule 26.1 K (limiting deposition time to one day of seven hours) is waived so as to allow each party an adequate opportunity to develop fully the record as it may relate to that party. However, this waiver shall not be construed as authority for any party to take unnecessarily long depositions, or abuse the process. Any abuses of this waiver
+
+shall result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions against the offending party.
+
+**DONE AND ORDERED** in [REDACTED] at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County,
+
+Florida, this 14<sup>th</sup> day of May, 2009
+
+![]()
+
+---
+
+KENNETH A. MARRA  
+United States District Judge
+
+Copies furnished to:
+
+all counsel of record
+
+Magistrate Judge Linnea R. [REDACTED]
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739886/EFTA02739886.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739886/EFTA02739886.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4516587055ad0372dd60636d0b2fc64f57530cb4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739886/EFTA02739886.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,253 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739886.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 5,
+  "chars": 3316,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 3.6,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            203.18400000000003,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            402.5581359863281,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            402.5581359863281,
+            100.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            203.18400000000003,
+            100.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES FOR PURPOSES OF DISCOVERY AND \nPROCEDURAL MOTIONS THAT RELATE TO MULTIPLE CASES",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            98.53200000000001,
+            594.54
+          ],
+          [
+            513.4083862304688,
+            594.54
+          ],
+          [
+            513.4083862304688,
+            625.1030120849609
+          ],
+          [
+            98.53200000000001,
+            625.1030120849609
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            23
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            50
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            24
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            45
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            23
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            23
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            9
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            21
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            14
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            11
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "Caption",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739886"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739891/EFTA02739891.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739891/EFTA02739891.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ca12d492d7b0b75a3b353e1a2a131869558c8283
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739891/EFTA02739891.md
@@ -0,0 +1,380 @@
+### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-MARRAa
+
+C.M. A.,
+
+v.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN and
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+Defendants,
+
+Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's Motion To Stay And Or Continue Action For Time Certain Based On Parallel Civil And Criminal Proceedints With Incorporated Memorandum Of Law
+
+Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, (hereinafter "EPSTEIN") by and through his undersigned attorneys, hereby moves this Court for the entry of an order staying or continuing this action for atime certain (i.e., until late 2010 when the NPA expires), pursuant to the application of the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and the fact that a parallel proceeding is ongoing and being investigated. In support of his motion, EPSTEIN states:
+
+### I. Introduction
+
+At the outset, EPSTEIN notes this Court's prior Order, dated December 16, 2008, (Document 28), in which this Court denied amotion for stay brought by Defendant's prior counsel. In that instance, Defendant's counsel requested a mandatory stay under 18 U.S.C.A. §3509(k) which the court denied. In denying the request for the stay, this Court stated that <sup>a</sup> discretionary stay was not appropriate at the time the order was entered but also stated, in part, that "Any such issues shall be resolved as they arise in the course of litigation.". As discussed herein, "special circumstances" now exist which, in the "interests of justice," merit the entry of <sup>a</sup> stay of this civil action until the criminal matter in the 15th Judicial Circuit is "closed" in
+
+accordance with the United States Attorney's Office ("USAO") Non-Prosecution Agreement ("NPA") and until the NPA expires.
+
+Moreover, EPSTEIN was indicted by a grand jury in or around July 2006. See Exhibit "A". The Non-Prosecution Agreement is part of the record in connection with that indictment, which is signed by the State Attorney of the 15th Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida ("SAO"). In fact, the NPA acknowledges the investigation performed by the SAO. Further, the USAO was present at the Plea hearing whereby the NPA was made part of the record. Thus, there is no question that a parallel criminal matter exists in that the SAO's case remains open and the NPA lives along side it, which places EPSTEIN under great scrutiny by the USAO. The NPA actually places an affirmative duty upon EPSTEIN to undertake discussions with the SAO to ensure compliance with the NPA. That check and balance, therefore, remains in the hands of the SAO, which has a parallel criminal proceeding. Here, the threat of prosecution is real, substantial, and present should the USAO determine that EPSTEIN somehow violated the NPA. As discussed below, because the NPA fails to define what constitutes a breach, the USA() has apparently taken it upon itself to determine whether a breach has occurred and whether to seek criminal prosecution. In fact, the USAO has already attempted to claim violations of the NPA due to, among other things, EPSTEIN defending the civil actions against him. Clearly, it is NOT simply EPSTEIN's choice as to whether he violates the NPA — that discretion apparently lies with the USAO. For this reason alone, a stay is required until the NPA expires.
+
+The difference between this Motion and the prior motion to stay is solely due to the ripeness of the issues discussed herein.
+
+# H. THE NPA
+
+By its terms, the NPA took effect on June 30, 2008 and expires by those same terms in late 2010 so long as EPSTEIN complies with the terms and conditions — violations of which remain undefined. The NPA, which remains under seal, outlines various obligations on the part of EPSTEIN including, but not limited to, pleading guilty to the Indictment and Information before the 15th Judicial Circuit, recommendations for his sentencing before the 15th Judicial Circuit, waiver of challenges to the Information filed by the SAO, waiver of right to appeal his conviction, agreement not be afforded benefits for gain time, and the agreement to not prosecute others listed thereon so long as EPSTEIN does not breach and fulfills the requirements of the NPA.
+
+What the NPA does not outline or define is what constitutes a breach or what act or omission constitutes a breach thereof. Therefore, the USAO apparently believes it has the discretion to make that unwritten and undefined determination, which places an unreasonable burden upon EPSTEIN in defending the civil claims in that he has no idea what the USAO will define as a breach in the event he does not assert his 5th Amendment Rights. As an example, the USAO has already claimed that EPSTEIN violated the NPA by:
+
+- 1. investigating the Plaintiffs (by and though his attorneys) whom brought civil suits against him for purposes of defending those civil actions;
+  - 2. contesting damages in this action and in the other civil actions;
+- 3. making statements to the press about this Plaintiff or other Plaintiffs by and though his attorneys; and
+
+4. using the word "jail" instead of "imprisonment" in the plea agreement with SA's office.
+
+See Exhibit "B" Goldberger Affidavit - EPSTEIN's criminal counsel.
+
+These allegations are silly, unfounded and alleged violations which are not defined as violations under the NPA but arrived at by the USAO. Thus, EPSTEIN is left with "Morton's Fork" in his side - the undesirable choice of taking the 5th Amendment and having a judgment (summary or otherwise) entered against him in the civil action or the undesirable choice of subjecting himself to discovery in the civil action before the NPA expires and, thus, face the possibility of criminal prosecution by the USAO based upon some illusory breach deemed by the USAO by way of information obtained through civil discovery proceedings. This is inherently unfair, the danger is clear, and the playing field is not level in light of the NPA language or lack thereof.
+
+As a result, the threat of criminal prosecution against EPSTEIN by the USAO continues presently and through late 2010.
+
+### III, Justice Requires The Entry of A Stay Because Defendant Is Being Forced To Choose Between Waiving His 51h Amendment Privilege Or Risk Losing This Civil Case And Forfeiting Other Constitutional Guarantees Of Due Process And Effective Assistance Of Counsel
+
+Once the NPA expires, EPSTEIN fully intends to testify to all relevant and nonobjectionable inquiries made to him in discovery be it a deposition, in interrogatories or in production requests. (Emphasis Added) However, the current circumstances are such that by testifying or responding to discovery, EPSTEIN will be required to waive his constitutional privileges, thereby subjecting himself to criminal prosecution and scrutiny by the USAO as a
+
+Page 5
+
+result of matters alleged in this civil action (and others before this Court and in the State of Florida 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County).
+
+The special circumstances of this action are such that a stay or continuance for atime certain is NOT prejudicial and is required to be entered so that:
+
+(1) EPSTEIN is not required to waive his Fifth Amendment right against selfincrimination under the United States Constitution resulting in severe prejudice to EPSTEIN in pending criminal matters; and
+
+(2) EPSTEIN is not forced to choose between waiving his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination or losing the civil case.
+
+Here, in asserting his Fifth Amendment Privilege, the Plaintiff is afforded an opportunity rarely given - that is, to put on only her evidence without any counterevidence from Defendant resulting in a judgment of liability against EPSTEIN. This is inherently unfair and precisely the special circumstances where "in the interests of justice" a stay is required. Ventura v. Brosky, <sup>2006</sup>WL 3392207 (S.D. Fla. 2006), citing United States v. Lot 5, Fox Grove, <sup>23</sup>F.3d 359 (11th Cir. 1994). In Ventura, <sup>a</sup>stay was entered where aDefendant was confronted with issue of waiving his 5th Amendment Privilege or to loose acivil case by way of motion for summary judgment. Id. Here, EPSTEIN is not requesting a mandatory stay. EPSTEIN only asks that this court recognize that "special circumstances" exists in this matter and enter a stay in the "interests of justice" and only for a specified period of time (i.e., after the NPA expires). See a\_122 Securities and Exchange Commission, <sup>755</sup>F.Supp. 1018, 1019 (S.D. Fla. 1990)(Defendant was in precarious position while being subject to criminal investigation and reasoning that compelling Defendant to speak by ordering an accounting of alleged illicit funds would directly
+
+Page 6
+
+impinge his right against self-incrimination). The court found it appropriate to grant the request for stay. (Emphasis Added).
+
+Citing to U.S. v. Lot 5. Fox Grove supra, the Southern District Court, Florida, in Ventura v. Broskv 2006 WL 3392207 (S.D. Fla. 2006), stated —
+
+The Eleventh Circuit has also created a test for these circumstances, stating that where there exists a concurrent civil and criminal proceeding, a court must stay a civil proceeding pending resolution of a related criminal prosecution when "special circumstances" so require in the "interests of justice."
+
+(Bold emphasis added). au also United States v. Kordel, 397 U.S. I, 12 & n. 27, 90 S.Ct. 763, 769-70 & n.27 (1970). The Ventura Court went on to state that "situations where a defendant in both criminal and civil proceedings must choose whether to waive his privilege against selfincrimination or to lose the civil case in summary or default judgment proceedings have met this test's burden and warrant a stay." Id. The Ventura court granted the stay. Here, the I5'h Judicial Circuit action lives along with the NPA.
+
+In making a decision to enter such a stay, the court may consider the following factors:
+
+- (I) the interests of the Plaintiffs in proceeding expeditiously with litigation, or any aspect of it, and the potential prejudice of Plaintiff to the delay;
+- (2) the burden which any particular aspect of the proceedings may impose on the defendant;
+- (3) the convenience of the court in the management of its cases, and the efficient use of judicial resources;
+  - (4) the interests of persons not parties to the civil litigation; and
+  - (5) the interest of the public in the pending civil and criminal litigation.
+
+Page 7
+
+See U.S. v. Pinnacle Ouest International, 2008 WL 4274498 (N.D. Fla. 2008).
+
+First, in applying the above factors, the Plaintiff in the instant matter will not be prejudiced simply by claiming a delay in time. Second, the burden is far greater on the EPSTEIN if he is forced to waive his 56 Amendment Privilege or remain silent and have a judgment entered against him or choose to testify and face criminal prosecution. Third, efficient use of judicial resources would be rendered upon a stay by way of preventing an appeal if such a stay is not entered. The Court has broad discretion to enter such a stay. Fourth, the interests of the individuals outlined in the NPA will be served because EPSTEIN's fulfillment of NPA alleged obligations is determinative upon whether the USAO prosecutes those individuals or whether the claims will be dropped upon the expiration of the NPA. Finally, the interest of the public in the pending civil and criminal cases will not be prejudiced as EPSTEIN is already serving his term whereby a plea was entered in the 15 Judicial Circuit action.
+
+# a. Application of the 5th Amendment
+
+Next, the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination "permits a person not to answer official questions put to him in any other proceeding, civil or criminal, formal or informal, where the answers might incriminate him in future criminal proceedings." Edwin v. Price, 778 F.2d 668, 669 (11th Cir. 1985), citin Lefkowitz v. Turley, 414 U.S. 70, 77, 94 S.C. 316, 322 (1973). See also Ohio v. Reiner, 532 U.S. 17, 21, 121 S.Ct. 1252 (2001)(The Fifth Amendment privilege is also available to those who claim innocence. One of the Fifth Amendment's "basic functions ... is to protect innocent men ... 'who otherwise might be ensnared by ambiguous circumstances."); Malloy v. Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process
+
+Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment - "(lit would be incongruous to have different standards determine the validity of a claim of privilege based on the same feared prosecution, depending on whether the claim was asserted in state or federal court."); Kastigar v. U.S., 406 U.S. 441, 444-45, 92 S.Ct. 1653 (1972XThe Fifth Amendment privilege "can be asserted in any proceeding, civil or criminal, administrative or judicial, investigatory or adjudicatory; and it protects against any disclosures which the witness reasonably believes could be used in a criminal prosecution or could lead to other evidence that might be so used. This Court has been zealous to safeguard the values which underlie the privilege." (Emphasis added)).
+
+The United States Supreme Court made it clear that the scope of the Fifth Amendment Privilege includes the circumstances as here "the act of producing documents in response to a subpoena (or production request) has a compelled testimonial aspect." United States v. Hubbell, 530 U.S. 27, 36, 120 S.Ct. 2037, 2043 (2000); see als2 Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391 (1976); McCormick on Evidence, Title 6, Chap. 13. The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination, §138 (6th Ed.). The privilege against self-incrimination may be asserted during discovery when a litigant has "reasonable grounds to believe that the response would furnish a link in the chain of evidence needed to prove a crime against a litigant." A witness, including a civil defendant, is entitled to invoke the Fifth Amendment privilege whenever there is a realistic possibility that the answer to a question could be used in anyway to convict the witness of a crime or could aid in the development of other incriminating evidence that can be used at trial. Id; Pillsbury Company v. Conbov, 495 U.S. 248, 103 S.Ct. 608 (1983).
+
+Certainly, if the USAO decides to prosecute EPSTEIN for an alleged violation of the NPA, it would undoubtedly be able to use information obtained during discovery against him or
+
+Page 9
+
+use that information to aid in the development of other evidence against him at a criminal trial. The USAO is already claiming violations of the NPA based upon EPSTEIN defending the civil actions and, at the same time, while EPSTEIN asserts the 5th Amendment. Imagine, because that is all we can do based on the lack of wording in the NPA, what violations the USAO will assert if EPSTEIN is forced to waive his 5th Amendment privilege to defend himself in this and the other civil actions.
+
+The Fifth Amendment provides, in relevant part, that "No person ... shall be compelled in any Criminal Case to be a witness against himself." Hoffman v. United States, 341 U.S. 479, 486, 71 S.Ct. 814 (1951), citing v. United States, 1944, 322 U.S. 487, 489, 64 S.Ct. 1082, 1083, 88 L.Ed. 1408." The Fifth Amendment's privilege against self-incrimination is "accorded liberal construction in favor of the right it was intended to secure." "The immediate and potential evils of compulsory self-disclosure transcend any difficulties that the exercise of the privilege may impose on society in the detection and prosecution of a crime." Id., at 490; and In re Financial Svcs. of Fla.. Inc., 259 B.R. 391, 399 (M.D. Fla. 2000). The privilege not only extends to answers that would in themselves support a conviction under a criminal statute but likewise embraces those which would furnish a link in the chain of evidence needed to prosecute the claimant for a crime. Id tiring Blau v. United States 1950, 340 U.S. 159, 71 S.Ct. 223. The Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination "permits a person not to answer official questions put to him in any other proceeding, civil or criminal, formal or informal, where the answers might incriminate him in future criminal proceedings." Edwin v. Price, 778 F.2d at 669, citing Lefkowitz v. Turley, 414 U.S. 70, 77, 94 S.C. 316, 322 (1973). As EPSTEIN is here, "the claimant must be 'confronted by substantial and `real,' and not merely
+
+trifling or imaginary, hazards of incrimination."' See generally United States v. Apfelbatun, 445 U.S. 115, 128, 100 S.Ct. 948, 956, 63 L.Ed.2d 250 (1980)). See also, United States v. Neff, 615 F.2d 1235, 1239 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 925, 100 S.Ct. 3018, 65 L.Ed.2d 1117 (1980XInformation is protected by the privilege not only if it would support a criminal conviction, but even if "the responses would merely `provide a lead or clue' to evidence having a tendency to incriminate."). EPSTEIN falls under each of the above category of cases.
+
+The United States Supreme Court has made clear that the scope of the Fifth Amendment Privilege also encompasses the circumstance where "the act of producing documents in response to a subpoena (or production request) has a compelled testimonial aspect." United States v. Hubbell 530 U.S. 27, 36, 120 S.Ct. 2037, 2043 (2000)• see also Fisher v. United States 425 U.S. 391 (1976). In explaining the application of the privilege, the Supreme Court stated:
+
+We have held that "the act of production" itself may implicitly communicate "statements of fact." By "producing documents in compliance with a subpoena, the witness would admit that the papers existed, were in his possession or control, and were authentic." Moreover, as was true in this case, when the custodian of documents responds to a subpoena, he may be compelled to take the witness stand and answer questions designed to determine whether he has produced everything demanded by the subpoena. The answers to those questions, as well as the act of production itself, may certainly communicate information about the existence, custody, and authenticity of the documents. Whether the constitutional privilege protects the answers to such questions, or protects the act of production itself, is a question that is distinct from the question whether the unprotected contents of the documents themselves are incriminating.
+
+"The issue presented in those cases was whether the act of producing subpoenaed documents, not itself the making of a statement, might nonetheless have some protected testimonial aspects. The Court concluded that the act of production could constitute protected testimonial communication because it might entail implicit statements of fact: by producing documents in compliance with a subpoena, the witness would admit that the papers existed, were in his possession or control, and were authentic. United States v. Doe, 465 U.S., at 613, and n. 11, 104 S.Ct. 1237. Fisher, 425 U.S., at 409-410. 96 S.Ct. 1569; id., at 428, 432, 96 S.Ct. 1569
+
+> (concurring opinions). See Braswell v. United States. 1487 U.S.,1 at 104. 108 S.Ct. 2284; f id..I at 122. 108 S.Ct. 2284 (dissenting opinion). Thus, the Court made clear that the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination applies to acts that imply assertions of fact."... An examination of the Court's application of these principles in other cases indicates the Court's recognition that, in order to be testimonial, an accused's communication must itself, explicitly or implicitly, relate a factual assertion or disclose information. Only then is a person compelled to be a 'witness' against himself." Doe v. United States. 487 U.S., at 209-210, 108 S.Ct. 2341 (footnote omitted).
+
+> Finally, the phrase "in any criminal case" in the text of the Fifth Amendment might have been read to limit its coverage to compelled testimony that is used against the defendant in the trial itself. It has, however, long been settled that its protection encompasses compelled statements that lead to the discovery of incriminating evidence even though the statements themselves are not incriminating and are not introduced into evidence. Thus, a half century ago we held that a trial judge had erroneously rejected a defendant's claim of privilege on the ground that his answer to the pending question would not itself constitute evidence of the charged offense. As we explained:
+
+> "The privilege afforded not only extends to answers that would in themselves support a conviction under a federal criminal statute but likewise embraces those which would furnish a link in the chain of evidence needed to prosecute the claimant for a federal crime." Hoffman v. United States. 341 U.S. 479, 486, 71 S.Ct. 814, 95 L.Ed. 1118 O951).
+
+> Compelled testimony that communicates information that may "lead to incriminating evidence" is privileged even if the information itself is not inculpatory. Doe v. United States. 487 U.S. 201. 208. n. 6, 108 S.Ct. 2341, 101 L.Ed.2d 184 (1988). It's the Fifth Amendment's protection against the prosecutor's use of incriminating information derived directly or indirectly from the compelled testimony of the respondent that is of primary relevance in this case.
+
+The privilege against self-incrimination may be asserted during discovery when a litigant has "reasonable grounds to believe that the response would furnish a link in the chain of evidence needed to prove a crime against a litigant." A witness, including a civil defendant, is entitled to invoke the Fifth Amendment privilege whenever there is a realistic possibility that the answer to a question could be used in anyway to convict the witness of a crime or could aid in
+
+the development of other incriminating evidence that can be used at trial. Id; Pillsbury Company v. Conboy, 495 U.S. 248, 103 S.Ct. 608 (1983). See also, Hubbell, supra, as to what is encompassed by the phrase "in any criminal case" contained in the Fifth Amendment.
+
+As noted, the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination is broad. Hoffman; In re Financial Svcs., supra. To deny a witness the right to invoke the privilege, the judge must be perfectly clear, from a careful consideration of all the circumstances in the case, that the witness is mistaken, and that the answers cannot possibly have such tendency to incriminate. Id at 488, 399. Recognizing the breadth and magnitude of this constitutional privilege, the United States Supreme Court in discussing how a court is to analyze the application of the privilege stated —
+
+... It is for the court to say whether his silence is justified, Rogers v. United States, 1951, 340 U.S. 367, 71 S.Ct. 438, and to require him to answer if 'it clearly appears to the court that he is mistaken.' Temple v. Commonwealth 1880, 75 Va. 892, 899. However, if the witness, upon interposing his claim, were required to prove the hazard in the sense in which a claim is usually required to be established in court, he would be compelled to surrender the very protection which the privilege is designed to guarantee. To sustain the privilege, it need only be evident from the implications of the question, in the setting in which it is asked, that a responsive answer to the question or an explanation of why it cannot be answered might be dangerous because injurious disclosure could result. The trial judge in appraising the claim 'must be governed as much by his personal perception of the peculiarities of the case as by the facts actually in evidence.'
+
+Hoffman, supra at 486-487.
+
+Hoffman and its progeny establish that "in view of the liberal construction of the provision [protecting against self-incrimination], after a witness has asserted the privilege, he should be compelled to provide the requested information only if it "clearly appears" to the court
+
+that the witness was mistaken in his invocation of the privilege." (Emphasis added). In re [REDACTED]  
+Financial Svcs., supra at 399, citing Hoffman, at 486.
+
+In the instant case, the privilege applies as Defendant EPSTEIN "has reasonable cause to apprehend danger from a direct answer." The risk of incrimination resulting from being subject to discovery or to testify in his own defense while the NPA exists is "substantial and real" and "not trifling or imaginary haphazards of communication." See generally, In re [REDACTED] Financial Svcs., supra at 400. Based on the nature of Plaintiff's claims, along with the ongoing scrutiny of the USAO in the criminal matters, EPSTEIN has "reasonable grounds to believe that his responses to the discovery would furnish a link in the chain of evidence needed to prove a crime against him. Finally, in order to preserve the privilege, the privilege must be asserted or one risks the loss or waiver of this liberty ensuring protection. See generally, U.S. v. [REDACTED], 846 F.2d 678, 690 (11<sup>th</sup> Cir. 1988)("First, it ignores the settled principle which requires a witness to assert his Fifth Amendment rights. A witness who testifies at any proceeding, instead of asserting his Fifth Amendment rights, loses the privilege. ... A civil deponent cannot choose to answer questions with the expectation of later asserting the Fifth Amendment.").
+
+Also applicable in upholding the assertion of the Fifth Amendment privilege is the guarantee of effective assistance of counsel by the Sixth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. See Yarborough v. Gentry, 124 S.Ct. 1, 540 U.S. 1, 157 L.Ed.2d 1 (2003)(Sixth Amendment guarantees criminal defendants effective assistance of counsel.), on remand 381 F.3d 1219. The United States Constitutional guarantees are applicable to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment. Obviously, EPSTEIN's assertion of his constitutional privileges and protections is on the advice of counsel. Again, EPSTEIN continues to face criminal prosecution by the USAO
+
+until the expiration of the NPA; under the constitutional guarantee of effective assistance of counsel, he is entitled to follow the recommended advice of his criminal defense attorney. See Goldberger Affidavit attached hereto.
+
+EPSTEIN's invocation of his constitutional protections of the Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments must be upheld for the reasons set forth herein; otherwise such constitutional protections would be rendered meaningless. Already and recently, Defendant EPSTEIN in his Response and Objections to discovery, attached hereto as Exhibit "C", has been required to assert, on advice of counsel, his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination, along with his constitutional rights afforded under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution. Thus, EPSTEIN's entitlement to a stay is ripe for determination.
+
+Based upon the foregoing, a stay is warranted in this action as the Defendant is being forced to choose between the assertion of his Fifth Amendment right or losing this case by judgment (summary or otherwise) or waiver of his 5ih Amendment right and face potential criminal prosecution.
+
+By: ROBERT D. C Florida Bar No. 24162 rcrit@bciclaw.com MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 ., ESQ.
+
+# Certificate of Service
+
+I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this
+
+day on all counsel of record identified on the following Service List in the manner specified by
+
+CM/ECF on this 24th day of March , 2009
+
+Richard Horace Willits, Esq. Richard H. Willits, P.A. 2290 10th Avenue North Suite 404 Lake Worth, FL 33461 561-582-7600 Fax: 561-588-8819 Counsel for Plaintiff C.M.A. reclrhw@botmail.com
+
+Jack Scarola, Esq. Jack P.M, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 561-686-6300 Fax: 561-383-9424 jsx(asearcvlaw.com jvhQsearcvlaw.com Co-Counsel for Plaintiff
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 561-659-8300 Fax: 561-835-8691 iagescabellsouth.net Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
+
+Bruce Reinhart, Esq. Bruce E. Reinhart, P.A. 250 S. Australian Avenue Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561-202-6360 Fax: 561-828-0983 ecf brucereinhartlaw. Couns• fo 'efendant
+
+Hee'
+
+Florida = ar No. 224 rcrit@belclaw.com MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 innike(4bc1claw.com BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN 515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561/842-2820 Phone 561/515-3148 Fax (Counsel for Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein)
+
+A TRUE BILL
+
+06-9454-CF  
+A2
+
+IN THE NAME OF AND BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
+
+IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL  
+CIRCUIT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
+
+For Palm Beach County, at the Spring Term thereof, in the year of our Lord Two Thousand and Six, to-wit:  
+The Grand Jurors of the State of Florida, inquiring in and for the body of said County of Palm Beach, upon their  
+oaths do present that JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN in the County of Palm Beach aforesaid, in the Circuit and State  
+aforesaid,
+
+### COUNT ONE FELONY SOLICITATION OF PROSTITUTION
+
+on or about or between the 1st day of August in the year of our Lord Two Thousand and Four and October 31,  
+2005, did solicit, induce, entice, or procure another to commit prostitution lewdness, or assignation, contrary to  
+Florida Statute 796.07(1) on three or more occasions between August 01, 2004 and October 31, 2005,  
+contrary to Florida Statute 796.07(2)(f) and (4)(c). (3 DEG FEL)(LEVEL 1)
+
+against the form of the statute, to the evil example of all others, and against the peace and dignity of the State  
+of Florida.
+
+I hereby certify that I have advised the Grand Jury returning this indictment as authorized and required by law.
+
+*[Handwritten signature]*  
+Assistant State Attorney of the  
+Fifteenth Judicial Circuit of the State  
+of Florida, prosecuting for the said  
+State
+
+*[Handwritten signature]*  
+GRAND JURY FOREPERSON  
+DATE
+
+EXHIBIT "A"
+
+Leffrey E. Epstein, Race: [REDACTED], Sex: Male, DOB: January 20, 1953, SS#: 090-44-3348; Issue Warrant
+
+**AFFIDAVIT OF JACK A. GOLDBERGER, ESQUIRE**
+
+STATE OF FLORIDA ) SS  
+COUNTY OF PALM BEACH )
+
+BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, personally appeared having personal knowledge and being duly sworn, deposes and says:
+
+1. I, **Jack A. Goldberger**, have personal knowledge of the matters set forth herein. I am an attorney licensed to practice in the State of Florida since 1978. I am a partner with the law firm of Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A., located at One Clearlake Centre, Suite 1400, 250 Australian Avenue South, West Palm Beach, FL 33401.
+
+2. My practice includes and specializes in the defense of criminal matters. I am board certified in criminal law. I have been and currently am the criminal defense attorney for JEFFREY EPSTEIN.
+
+3. I represented Mr. EPSTEIN in the negotiation of and entering into a Non-Prosecution Agreement with the United States Attorney's Office (USAO) for the Federal Southern District of Florida. The terms and conditions of the Non-Prosecution Agreement also entailed the entering of a Plea Agreement with the State Attorney's Office, Palm Beach County, State of Florida. (The Non-Prosecution Agreement shall hereinafter be referred to as the "NPA").
+
+4. By its terms, the NPA took effect on June 30, 2008. Also, pursuant to the terms of the NPA, any criminal prosecution against EPSTEIN is deferred as long as the terms and conditions of the NPA are fulfilled by EPSTEIN.
+
+EXHIBIT "B"
+
+5. The criminal matters against EPSTEIN remain ongoing until the NPA expires by its terms in late 2010, and as long as the USAO determines EPSTEIN has complied with those terms and conditions. The threat of criminal prosecution against EPSTEIN by USAO in the Southern District of Florida continues presently and through late 2010.
+
+6. Pursuant to the terms of the NPA, the USAO possesses the right to declare that the agreement has been breached, give EPSTEIN's counsel notice, and attempt to move forward with a prosecution. As of the date of this Affidavit, the USAO has taken the position on a number of occasions that it might consider the following actions by EPSTEIN to be a breach of the NPA.
+
+- Investigation by EPSTEIN (by and through his attorneys) of this Plaintiff and the other Plaintiffs in other pending civil cases for purposes of defending the civil actions;
+- EPSTEIN's contesting damages in this action and other civil actions.
+- EPSTEIN or his legal representatives making statements to the press about this Plaintiff or the other Plaintiffs.
+- Using the word "jail" instead of "imprisonment" in the plea agreement with the Palm Beach County State Attorney's Office.
+
+7. EPSTEIN, through counsel, submitted a Freedom of Information Act request to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) for documents relating to this and the other cases; the FBI denied the request stating the materials are at this time exempt from disclosure because they are in an investigative file, i.e. the matter is still an ongoing criminal investigation.
+
+8. The NPA expires in late 2010.
+
+FURTHER THE AFFIANT SAYETH NAUGHT
+
+![]()STATE OF FLORIDA  
+COUNTY OF PALM BEACH
+
+I hereby Certify that on this day, before me, an officer duly authorized to administer oaths and take acknowledgments, personally appeared Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire, known to me to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing Affidavit, who acknowledged before me that he/she executed the same, that I relied upon the following form of identification of the above named person: Known Personally, and that an oath was/was not taken.
+
+WITNESS my hand and official seal in the County and State last aforesaid this 19<sup>th</sup> day of February, 2009.
+
+(SEARCHED
+
+![](_page_18_Picture_19.jpeg)
+
+![]()
+
+### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-MARRA/
+
+C.M. A.,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+v.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN and
+
+Defendants,
+
+### DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE & OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
+
+Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, by and through his undersigned attorneys, hereby responds to Plaintiffs First Request For Production To Defendant, served January 8, 2009 and states:
+
+Request No. 1: Any and all evidence required to be maintained by Epstein and the United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, specifically evidence requested by or directly related to the grand jury subpoenas that have been issued in connection with the investigation referenced in the Non-Prosecution Agreement, and including certain computer equipment.
+
+Response: Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the production request as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to produce all relevant documents regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that at the present time I cannot select, authenticate, and produce documents relevant to this
+
+> tic / EXHIBIT : <sup>S</sup><sup>W</sup>
+
+\_.\6'
+
+lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, the information sought is privileged and confidential, and inadmissible pursuant to the terms of the deferred prosecution agreement, Fed. Rule of Evidence 410 and 408, and §90.410, Fla. Stat. Further, the request may include information subject to work product or an attorney-client privilege.
+
+Request No. 2: Any and all documents reflecting or relating to the identity of, the scheduling of, and/or the payment of any female compensated by or on behalf of Epstein for providing any service to Epstein that required, contemplated, or included in the provisions of such service, any physical contact between Epstein and the female, any act or prostitution, any illicit sexual conduct, the exposure of breast, buttocks or genitalia, or any commercial sex act as defined in 18 U.S.C. §1591(c)(1).
+
+Response: Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the production request as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to produce all relevant documents regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that at the present time I cannot select, authenticate, and produce documents relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the
+
+Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, the information sought is privileged and confidential, and inadmissible pursuant to the terms of the deferred prosecution agreement, Fed. Rule of Evidence 410 and 408, and §90.410, Fla. Stat. Further Defendants objects to the production as overly broad and seeking information that is neither relevant to the subject matter of the pending action nor does it appear to be reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. The Plaintiff in this instance has alleged in her complaint that she was sexually abused by the Defendant on one occasion sometime in the year 2004. The documents requested herein have no time period provided, and therefore the information sought is grossly overbroad.
+
+Request No. 3: Any and all documents reflecting or relating to the identity of and/or the nature and extent of any other person's participation in the communication with and/or the scheduling of and/or the payment of any person who participated in any conduct described in Request #2.
+
+Response: Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the production request as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to produce all relevant documents regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that at the present time I cannot select, authenticate, and produce documents relevant to this
+
+lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, the information sought is privileged and confidential, and inadmissible pursuant to the terms of the deferred prosecution agreement, Fed. Rule of Evidence 410 and 408, and §90.410, Fla. Stat. Further Defendants objects to the production as overly broad and seeking information that is neither relevant to the subject matter of the pending action nor does it appear to be reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. The Plaintiff in this instance has alleged in her complaint that she was sexually abused by the Defendant on one occasion sometime in the year 2004. The documents requested herein have no time period provided, and therefore the information sought is grossly overbroad.
+
+# Certificate of Service
+
+I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was sent by U.S. mail to the following addressees, on this 6th day of February , 2009
+
+Richard Horace Willits, Esq. Richard H. Willits, P.A. 2290 10th Avenue North Suite 404 Lake Worth, FL 33461 561-582-7600
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 561-659-8300
+
+Page 5
+
+Fax: 561-588-8819
+
+Counsel for Plaintiff C.M.A.
+
+reelrhwehotmail.com
+
+Jack Scarola, Esq.
+
+Jack P. El Esq.
+
+Searcy Denney Scarola Bamhart
+
+Shipley, P.A.
+
+2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
+
+West Palm Beach, FL 33409
+
+561-686-6300
+
+Fax: 561-383-9424
+
+isx searcvlaw.com
+
+jphOsearcylaw.com
+
+Co-Counsel for Plaintiff
+
+Fax: 561-835-8691
+
+jaaesqe.bellsouth.net
+
+Counsel for Defendants Jeffrey Epstein and
+
+Bruce Reinhart, Esq.
+
+Bruce E. Reinhart, P.A.
+
+& 250 S. Australian Avenue
+
+Suite 1400
+
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+
+561-202-6360
+
+Fax: 561-828-0983
+
+ecfebrucereinhartlaw.com
+
+Counsel for Defendant
+
+Respectfully sub
+
+By:
+
+ROBERT D. RITTON, JR., ESQ.
+
+Florida Bar o. 224162
+
+rcritabcIclaw.com
+
+MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ.
+
+Florida Bar #617296
+
+moike(d)bcIclaw.com
+
+BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN
+
+515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400
+
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+
+561/842-2820 Phone
+
+561/515-3148 Fax
+
+(Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein)
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739891/EFTA02739891.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739891/EFTA02739891.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0492a70b87f0b1f43ff54997082d9095686210d4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739891/EFTA02739891.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,1178 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739891.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 24,
+  "chars": 40935,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 11.71,
+  "image_assets": [
+    "_page_18_Picture_19.jpeg"
+  ],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            187.575,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            399.2347412109375,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            399.2347412109375,
+            99.63
+          ],
+          [
+            187.575,
+            99.63
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "I. Introduction",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            244.77,
+            486.0
+          ],
+          [
+            351.5185852050781,
+            486.0
+          ],
+          [
+            351.5185852050781,
+            498.5663757324219
+          ],
+          [
+            244.77,
+            498.5663757324219
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "H. THE NPA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            247.23000000000002,
+            104.49
+          ],
+          [
+            346.05218505859375,
+            104.49
+          ],
+          [
+            346.05218505859375,
+            121.4730224609375
+          ],
+          [
+            247.23000000000002,
+            121.4730224609375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "III, Justice Requires The Entry of A Stay Because Defendant Is Being \nForced To Choose Between Waiving His 51h Amendment Privilege Or Risk \nLosing This Civil Case And Forfeiting Other Constitutional Guarantees Of \nDue Process And Effective Assistance Of Counsel",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            99.63,
+            491.66999999999996
+          ],
+          [
+            490.9073791503906,
+            491.66999999999996
+          ],
+          [
+            490.9073791503906,
+            550.4830169677734
+          ],
+          [
+            99.63,
+            550.4830169677734
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "a. Application of the 5th Amendment",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            185.73,
+            434.15999999999997
+          ],
+          [
+            402.58270263671875,
+            434.15999999999997
+          ],
+          [
+            402.58270263671875,
+            451.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            185.73,
+            451.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Certificate of Service",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 13,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            236.16,
+            601.8299999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            350.70050048828125,
+            601.8299999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            350.70050048828125,
+            617.6030120849609
+          ],
+          [
+            236.16,
+            617.6030120849609
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "INDICTMENT",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 15,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            236.77499999999998,
+            30.78
+          ],
+          [
+            343.1700000000001,
+            30.78
+          ],
+          [
+            343.1700000000001,
+            49.41
+          ],
+          [
+            236.77499999999998,
+            49.41
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "COUNT ONE FELONY SOLICITATION OF PROSTITUTION",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 15,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            166.05,
+            257.58
+          ],
+          [
+            400.98,
+            257.58
+          ],
+          [
+            400.98,
+            286.74
+          ],
+          [
+            166.05,
+            286.74
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "AFFIDAVIT OF JACK A. GOLDBERGER, ESQUIRE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 16,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            145.14,
+            70.47
+          ],
+          [
+            435.41999999999996,
+            70.47
+          ],
+          [
+            435.41999999999996,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            145.14,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PALM BEACH",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 18,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            73.8,
+            251.10000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            230.01,
+            251.10000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            230.01,
+            279.45
+          ],
+          [
+            73.8,
+            279.45
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 19,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            183.26999999999998,
+            102.06
+          ],
+          [
+            392.80389404296875,
+            102.06
+          ],
+          [
+            392.80389404296875,
+            130.41
+          ],
+          [
+            183.26999999999998,
+            130.41
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE & OBJECTIONS \nTO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 19,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            102.705,
+            349.92
+          ],
+          [
+            470.3404235839844,
+            349.92
+          ],
+          [
+            470.3404235839844,
+            380.7
+          ],
+          [
+            102.705,
+            380.7
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Certificate of Service",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 22,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            242.925,
+            549.99
+          ],
+          [
+            369.775390625,
+            549.99
+          ],
+          [
+            369.775390625,
+            565.6800079345703
+          ],
+          [
+            242.925,
+            565.6800079345703
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            300
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            349
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            58
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            60
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            379
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            69
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            70
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            68
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            63
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 9,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            85
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            36
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 10,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            85
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            39
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 11,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            75
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            31
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 12,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            9
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 13,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            59
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            29
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 14,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            121
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            58
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            11
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 15,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            24
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 16,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            14
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 17,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            52
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 18,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            13
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "Picture",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 19,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            205
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 20,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            312
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 21,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            52
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 22,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            75
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            35
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 23,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            182
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            45
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            42
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739891"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739891/_page_18_Picture_19.jpeg b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739891/_page_18_Picture_19.jpeg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b68788dab18272dabbf21b9cddef874a0fdfbc6e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739891/_page_18_Picture_19.jpeg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:f7f809dfb7a75b641200bb07762d44cdfc6d7a27419405f435351a37d70da075
+size 10683
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739915/EFTA02739915.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739915/EFTA02739915.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..080fbb3f12f0c1ae455d625017d67b1551094951
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739915/EFTA02739915.md
@@ -0,0 +1,137 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 2,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA
+
+CASE NO.: 013-CV-80232-MARRA
+
+/
+
+JANE DOE NO. 4,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 5,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRA,
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80381-MARRA/
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 6,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+CASE NO.: 08-80994-CIV-MARRA/M.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 7, CASE NO.: 08-80993-CIV-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+C.M.A., CASE NO.: 08-8081 I-CIV-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE, CASE NO.: 08- 80893-CIV-MARRA/
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN et al,
+
+Defendants.
+
+DOE II, CASE NO.: 09- 80469-CIV-MARRA/MMI
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN et al,
+
+Defendants.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 101, CASE NO.: 09- 80591-CIV-MARRA I
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+/
+
+JANE DOE NO. 102 CASE NO.: 09- 80656-CIV-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## ORDER REQUESTING THE UNITED STATES TO PROVIDE ITS POSITION REGARDING DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO STAY/CONTINUE THE CIVIL CASES PENDING AGAINST HIM
+
+THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the motions filed in several cases by Defendant
+
+Jeffrey Epstein to Stay and/or Continue the Action for Time Certain Based on Parallel Civil and Criminal Proceedings. See, e.g., docket entry 51 in C.M.A. v. Epstein and =, case no. 08- 80811 (attached). Epstein moves for a stay until the expiration of the Non-Prosecution Agreement ("NPA") with the United States Attorney's Office (USAO) because, he claims, the USAO has taken the position that he is violating the NPA by defending the civil actions filed against him. Therefore, he argues that he cannot defend the civil actions without subjecting himself to criminal prosecution.
+
+While the Court recognizes that the United States is not a party to these actions and is not obligated to comment on this matter, the position of the United States would greatly assist the Court in resolving the merits of these motions to continue/stay the case. Accordingly, the Court requests that the United States provide its position on the matter. The Court would appreciate the governments position within 15 days if possible. If the United States is unwilling to state its position, the Court would also appreciate being so advised.
+
+DONE AND ORDERED in at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 14th day of May, 2009
+
+> KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge
+
+Copies furnished to: all counsel of record Ann Villafana
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739915/EFTA02739915.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739915/EFTA02739915.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a37bad4c3f39763a1ae8d93dcdfe71172e576307
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739915/EFTA02739915.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,215 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739915.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 4,
+  "chars": 2669,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.42,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            203.18400000000003,
+            70.47
+          ],
+          [
+            402.5581359863281,
+            70.47
+          ],
+          [
+            402.5581359863281,
+            100.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            203.18400000000003,
+            100.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "ORDER REQUESTING THE UNITED STATES TO PROVIDE ITS POSITION \nREGARDING DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO STAY/CONTINUE THE CIVIL \nCASES PENDING AGAINST HIM",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            72.216,
+            595.3499999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            539.7191162109375,
+            595.3499999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            539.7191162109375,
+            638.9830169677734
+          ],
+          [
+            72.216,
+            638.9830169677734
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            55
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            23
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            48
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            24
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            24
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            49
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            24
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            24
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            48
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            23
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739915"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739919/EFTA02739919.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739919/EFTA02739919.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8bfe32a13e8d02ae166692b6624798fb12548ba4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739919/EFTA02739919.md
@@ -0,0 +1,135 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 2,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEN-REY EPSTEIN
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 4,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN
+
+Defendant.
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-114ARRA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80381-MARRA/J4
+
+JANE DOE NO. 5,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+CASE NO.: 08-80994.CIV-MARRA/J
+
+JANE DOE NO. 6,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+CASE NO.: 08-80993-CIV-MARRA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 7,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN
+
+• Defendant.
+
+C.M.A., CASE NO.: 08-80811-CIV-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE, CASE NO.: 08-80893-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+JEYPREY EPSTEIN et al,
+
+Defendants.
+
+DOE II, CASE NO.: 09-80469-CIV-MARRA-J
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN et al,
+
+Defendants.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 101, CASE NO.: 09-80591-CIV-MARRA-J
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 102, CASE NO.: 09-80656-CIV-MARRA/J
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+DEFENDANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS' JANE DOE 2 -7 RESPONSES IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO COMPEL ANSWERS TO 1". SET OF INTERROGATORIES ANDIsT REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
+
+Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, (hereinafter "Epstein") by and through his undersigned attorneys, respectfully moves this Court for an extension of time in which to reply to Plaintiffs' Responses In Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Compel Answers to Interrogatories And Production of Documents, dated March 2, 2009. Local General Rule 7.1 A.1 and Rule 6, Fed. R. Civ. P. (2009). Defendant seeks an extension until May 22, 2009, to file his response. As good cause in support of granting the motion, Defendant states:
+
+1. Defendant's reply to the Plaintiff's Responses in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to compel would be due on May 18, 2009. As certified below, Plaintiffs counsel is in agreement with the requested extension of May 20, 2009.
+
+2. Plaintiffs counsel also represents five other Plaintiffs pursuing claims against Defendant, EPSTEIN. A total of five of the Plaintiffs have also filed Responses In Opposition to Defendant's Motions to Compel bearing the same dates. In order to fully and adequately respond to this and the other motions, Defendant is in need of an extension until May 20, 2009.
+
+3. The requested extension is fair in reasonable under the circumstances as it will provide time to allow the Defendant, EPSTEIN, to fully and adequately reply to this and the other Responses in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Compel.
+
+WHEREFORE, Defendant requests that this Court enter an order granting the Defendant an extension until May 20, 2009, in which to respond to Plaintiff's Response in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Compel Answers to Interrogatories and Production of documents.
+
+## Local Rule 7.1 Certification
+
+Counsel for Plaintiff is in agreement with the requested extension until May 20, 2009 for Defendant to respond to the motion to compel.
+
+Robert D. Critton, Jr. Attorney for Defendant Epstein
+
+## Certificate of Service
+
+I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record identified on the following Service List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on this 1801 day of May, 2009:
+
+Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A. 18205 Biscayne Boulevard Suite 2218 Miami, FL 33160 305-931-2200 Fax: 305-931-0877 ssm@sexabuseattorney.com ahorowitz@sexabuseattomey.com Counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe #2
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 561-659-8300 Fax: 561-835-8691 iaaesci@bellsouth.net Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
+
+Respectf By: ROBERTD CR TTON, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar No. 162 rcrit@bciclaw.com MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 mpike@bdclaw.com BURMAN, CR1TTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN 515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561/842-2820 Phone 561/515-3148 Fax (Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein)
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739919/EFTA02739919.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739919/EFTA02739919.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b1756dccb1fb51f83aef5972ce1c9749282db736
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739919/EFTA02739919.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,276 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739919.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 5,
+  "chars": 4233,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.37,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            198.89999999999998,
+            74.52
+          ],
+          [
+            410.98565673828125,
+            74.52
+          ],
+          [
+            410.98565673828125,
+            103.863037109375
+          ],
+          [
+            198.89999999999998,
+            103.863037109375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Local Rule 7.1 Certification",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            239.904,
+            681.21
+          ],
+          [
+            375.4845275878906,
+            681.21
+          ],
+          [
+            375.4845275878906,
+            696.3630142211914
+          ],
+          [
+            239.904,
+            696.3630142211914
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Certificate of Service",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            268.05600000000004,
+            212.22000000000003
+          ],
+          [
+            381.45050048828125,
+            212.22000000000003
+          ],
+          [
+            381.45050048828125,
+            226.863037109375
+          ],
+          [
+            268.05600000000004,
+            226.863037109375
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            45
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            22
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            19
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            41
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            24
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            21
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            47
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            22
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            21
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            95
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            46
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739919"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739924/EFTA02739924.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739924/EFTA02739924.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9c21afbd6eae264a1316f3709f1b354473684871
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739924/EFTA02739924.md
@@ -0,0 +1,161 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+JANE DOE NO.2,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+CASE NO.; 08-CV-80119-MARRAL
+
+JANE DOE NO.3, CASE NO.; 08-CV-80232-MARRA/
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO.4, CASE NO.; 08-CV-80380-MARRA/
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 5,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+CASE NO.; 08-CV-80381-MARRA/
+
+Ail
+
+JANE DOE NO. 6,
+
+Plaintiff, CASE NO.; 08-CV-80994-MARRA/
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 7, CASE NO.; 08-CV-80993-MARRA/
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+C.M.A., CASE NO.; 08-CV-80811-MARRA/
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE, CASE NO.; 08-CV-80893-MARRA/
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN, et al.,
+
+Defendants.
+
+DOE II,
+
+Plaintiff, CASE NO.; 08-CV-80469-MARRA
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN, et al,
+
+Defendants.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 101, CASE NO.; 08-CV-80591-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 102,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+CASE NO.; 08-CV-80656-MARRA/JOHNSON
+
+## AFFIDAVIT OF MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQUIRE
+
+STATE OF FLORIDA
+
+SS
+
+COUNTY OF PALM BEACH )
+
+PERSONALLY APPEARED before the undersigned Notary Public, Michael
+
+J. Pike, Esq., who after being sworn states the following:
+
+1. My name is Michael Pike, and I am one of the attorneys assigned to this matter. Burman, Critton, Luttier and Coleman, LLP, Robert D. Critton, Jr., Esq., J. Michael Burman, Esq., and I represent Jeffrey Epstein. I have knowledge of the facts outlined in the Motion to Strike Cases from Current Trial Dockets and/or Motion to Continue Cases and/or Motion to Modify Trial and Scheduling Orders ("Motion to Strike"). I have fully read the Motion, and I personally drafted the Motions and Replies to various discovery responses identified by docket entry in the Motion to Strike.
+
+2. The information set forth in the Motion to Strike is true and accurate in that the undersigned law firm, on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein, has attempted in good faith to obtain discovery in preparation for trial and in accordance with this Court's Order Setting Trial Date and Discovery Deadlines, Referring Case to Mediation and Referring Discovery Motions to the United States Magistrate Judge.
+
+3. Unfortunately, due to the Plaintiff's delays, objections to relevant discovery and refusal to allow Jeffrey Epstein to identify Plaintiffs in other Third-Party Subpoenas, the undersigned has a good faith belief that it will be impossible to complete discovery pursuant to the Court's Scheduling Order. In fact, as outlined in the Motion to Strike, it is abundantly clear that Jeffrey Epstein has not been afforded any meaningful discovery and cannot properly prepare the cases for trial. It will also be impossible to satisfy the remaining schedules referenced in the Motion.
+
+4. In short, Plaintiffs have refused and/or failed to produce any
+
+meaningful discovery and/or answer any meaningful discovery responses. As a result, the undersigned has not had an opportunity to depose any individuals that may have information about the allegations made by Plaintiffs.
+
+5. Next, as stated in the Motion to Strike, Plaintiffs' counsel refuses to allow the undersigned law firm to identify Plaintiffs by their true legal names in the style of the case and/or identify the Plaintiffs in any third party subpoenas, which has effectively prevented the undersigned law firm from obtaining any meaningful discovery about the Plaintiffs and/or the damages they seek. As stated in the Motion to Strike, Brad EM has agreed to such a procedure relative to third party subpoenas.
+
+6. As a result, good cause has been shown to continue the actions or modify the schedules. Therefore, the cases should be struck from the current trial dockets, continued to the next available trial dockets or, alternatively, the discovery schedules and other related schedules outlined in the Court's Scheduling Orders should be modified as requested in the Motion. Without the granting of the Continuance and/or a Modified Scheduling Order, Mr. Epstein's due process rights will be violated in that he will not be able to prepare and properly defend the cases for trial. This will substantially prejudice Jeffrey Epstein.
+
+FURTHER THE AFFIANT SAYETH NAUGH
+
+STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF PALM BEACH Mich YI J. Pi e, sq.
+
+I hereby Certify that on this day, before me, an officer duly authorized to administer oaths and take acknowledgments, personally appeared Michael J. Pike, Esquire, known to me to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing Affidavit, who acknowledged before me that he/she executed the same, that I relied upon the following form of identification of the above named person: MICHAEL J. PIKE, and that an oath was/was not taken.
+
+WITNESS my hand and official seal in the County and State last aforesaid this 19th day of MAY, 2009.
+
+![](_page_5_Picture_10.jpeg)
+
+*Jessica Cadwell*  
+PRINT NAME: JESSICA CADWELL  
+NOTARY PUBLIC/STATE OF FLORIDA  
+COMMISSION NO.:  
+MY COMMISSION EXPIRES:
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739924/EFTA02739924.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739924/EFTA02739924.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..37286a7fe571da8d14d72585c3ac91070fbf10c8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739924/EFTA02739924.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,281 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739924.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 6,
+  "chars": 5071,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 4.47,
+  "image_assets": [
+    "_page_5_Picture_10.jpeg"
+  ],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            198.89999999999998,
+            74.52
+          ],
+          [
+            413.646484375,
+            74.52
+          ],
+          [
+            413.646484375,
+            105.35302734375
+          ],
+          [
+            198.89999999999998,
+            105.35302734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "AFFIDAVIT OF MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQUIRE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            179.928,
+            515.16
+          ],
+          [
+            433.8089294433594,
+            515.16
+          ],
+          [
+            433.8089294433594,
+            530.6835327148438
+          ],
+          [
+            179.928,
+            530.6835327148438
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            45
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            23
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            50
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            24
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            50
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "Picture",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739924"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739924/_page_5_Picture_10.jpeg b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739924/_page_5_Picture_10.jpeg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3123ce211957762e36246557f783d90acc11fb4c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739924/_page_5_Picture_10.jpeg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:5ec7b1872ede4282fe2563c09e6a6946b59b3f3c8988fb169352c0efe18db1c7
+size 12685
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739930/EFTA02739930.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739930/EFTA02739930.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..69ce625fe996ca309f40ef1782a46cc8ad6844d2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739930/EFTA02739930.md
@@ -0,0 +1,250 @@
+#### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+JANE DOE NO.2,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+CASE NO.; 08-CV-80119-MARRAMIll
+
+JANE DOE NO.3, CASE NO.; 08-CV-80232-MARRA/JOHNSON
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO.4, CASE NO.; 08-CV-80380-MARRA/JOHNSON
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 5, CASE NO.; 08-CV-80381-MARRAIMIN
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 6,
+
+Plaintiff, CASE NO.; 08-CV-80994-MARRA/JOHNSON
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 7, CASE NO.; 08-CV-80993-MARRAMIIIII
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+C.M.A., CASE NO.; 08-CV-80811-MARRA/JOHNSON
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE, CASE NO.; 08-CV-80893-MARRA/JOHNSON
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN, et al.,
+
+Defendants.
+
+DOE II,
+
+Plaintiff, CASE NO.; 08-CV-80469-MARRe
+
+vs.
+
+JEN-REY EPSTEIN, et al,
+
+Defendants.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 101, CASE NO.; 08-CV-80591-MARRA/JOHNSON
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 102, CASE NO.; 08-CV-80656-MARRA/JOHNSON
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+### Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's Motion To Strike Cases From Current Trial Docket And Motion to Continue Case And/Or Alternative Motion to Modify Trial and Scheduling Order Deadlines
+
+Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, (hereinafter "EPSTEIN") by and through his undersigned attorneys, hereby moves this Court for the entry of an order Striking These Cases (i.e., C.M.A., Jane Doe (80893) and Jane Does 2-7) From The Current Trial Docket(s), Continuing The Trials And Setting Them On New Trial Dockets At Least
+
+Three Months After The Current Trial Dates As Set Or, Alternatively, Modifying The Current Trial Schedule To Allow For An Additional 3 Months From Current Dates Within Which To Complete Discovery, An Additional 2 Months From The Current Dates Within Which To Complete All Substantive Pretrial Motions and Expert Discovery, An Additional Month From The Current Dates Within Which To Mediate the Matters and An Additional Month to Complete the Remaining Scheduling Deadlines under this Court's Trial Orders. In support, EPSTEIN states:
+
+## I. Procedural Background and Argument' With Incorporated Memorandum of Law<sup>l</sup>
+
+1. C.M.A. was filed on February 23, 2008. C.M.A. filed her First Amended Complaint on February 10, 2009. (C.M.A. DE 39-40). Epstein's Motion to Dismiss same was filed on March 12, 2009. (C.M.A. DE 47). The Motion to Dismiss remains outstanding.
+
+2. Jane Doe (80893) was filed on August 13, 2008. On April 17, 2009, Jane Doe filed her First Amended Complaint.
+
+3. The Jane Doe 2-7 cases were filed between February 6, 2008 and September 10, 2008. Jane Does 2-7 filed their Second Amended Complaints on February 2009.
+
+4. Pursuant to the court's Orders Setting Trial And Discovery Deadlines, Referring Case To Mediator And Referring Discovery Motions To U.S. Magistrate Judge (the
+
+In an effort not to repeat certain legal arguments set out in various Motions and Replies referenced below and identified herein by Docket Number, those motions and replies, with legal arguments, are specifically incorporated herein by reference.
+
+"Trial Orders"), these matters are currently set on this court's Trial Dockets commencing January 25, 2010, February 8, 2010 and February 22, 2010.
+
+5. Pursuant to the Trial Orders, discovery cutoff is August 2009 for C.M.A. and Jane Does 2-5, and October 2009 for Jane Doe and Jane Does 6-7. Substantive pretrial motions must be completed in August 2009 for C.M.A. and Jane Does 2-5, and October <sup>2009</sup>for Jane Doe and Jane Does 6-7. Mediation must be completed on November <sup>2009</sup>for Jane Does 2-5, and December 2009 for C.M.A., Jane Doe and Jane Does 6-7. Finally, Expert discovery must be completed on June 29, 2009 for C.M.A.
+
+6. As to C.M.A., Jane Doe and Jane Does 2-7, each has objected to relevant discovery. C.M.A. has even refused to produce certain information that she agreed to produce in discovery. The foregoing delay tactics has prevented Epstein from conducting meaningful discovery in order to defend these matters and prepare for trial. At this juncture, Plaintiffs wish for Epstein to try this case without any discovery whatsoever. See infra.
+
+7. For example, in adiligent effort to obtain discovery, Epstein filed substantive motions addressing C.M.A.'s objections to discovery, and those motions remain outstanding? See (C.M.A. - DE 54 — Motion to Compel Responses to First Request to Produce and First Set of Interrogatories and DE 70 - Epstein's Reply to Plaintiff's Opposition Motion thereto). Epstein's Motion to Compel (C.M.A. DE 54) and Reply
+
+The same discovery requests were served upon Jane Doe and Jane Does 2-7. Substantive Motions to Compel seeking production of similar information in those cases were filed and remain outstanding. See Jane Doe DE 27 & <sup>28</sup>and Jane Doe 2-7 (specifically, Jane Doe 2 - DE 67-68, Jane Doe 3 — DE 59-60, Jane Doe 4 - DE 74-75, Jane Doe 5 — DE 69-70, Jane Doe 6 - DE 24-25, and Jane Doe 7 — DE 26-27). Those Motions are incorporated herein by reference.
+
+(C.M.A. DE 70) are incorporated herein by reference. The Motion and the Reply seek basic and elementary discovery. For instance, the Motion and the Reply seek:
+
+- a. individual and/or joint income tax returns and supporting documentation including W-2 and 1099 forms for 2002-2007 and, as well as all records or documentation relative to the Plaintiff's earnings for the current year;
+- b. All bills/expenses from any medical doctor, chiropractor, psychologists, psychiatrists, mental health counselors (including any members of the healing arts and related , i.e. drugs, prescriptions, etc.) you claim you incurred as a result of the injuries which are or may be the subject matter of this lawsuit;
+- c. All medical reports and/or records from doctors, physicians, (including psychologists, psychiatrists, mental health counselors), hospitals, drug or alcohol facilities or any other person or entity who has rendered treatment to or examined you for any reason after the incident(s) which is the subject matter of this lawsuit;
+- d. the names, business addresses, telephone and cell phone numbers, dates of employment, immediate supervisor (name and address) and rates of pay regarding all employers, including selfemployment, for whom you have worked in the past 10 years; this includes listing all sources of income you have received. Answer this question by year, i.e. 1998 — 2009; and
+- e. the names, addresses and phone numbers of all males, excluding Mr. Epstein, with whom you have had sexual activity since age 10 (by year) up through your current age. Describe the nature of sexual activity, the date(s) and whether you received money or other consideration from the person.
+
+(DE 54 & 70)
+
+8. C.M.A. objected to producing the tax information requested in 4(a) above, which will show where C.M.A. worked, and she also speciously objected to the companion interrogatory (4(d) above) wherein she refuses to identify where she worked for the requested time period. Epstein needs the requested information so his attorneys can
+
+conduct the appropriate discovery on C.M.A.'s supervisors and co-workers (and others that may be identified during those depositions) in connection with the allegations C.M.A. has made against Epstein in her 89-page Amended Complaint. By virtue of C.M.A. and the other Plaintiffs concealing the above information, Epstein has been prevented from conducting any meaningful discovery, including the taking of any depositions of C.M.A.'s supervisors, co-workers, acquaintances, friends and other third parties.
+
+9. As stated above, Jane Doe and Jane Does 2-7 made similar objections which are the subject of various Motions to Compel. Epstein needs this information to defend the Plaintiffs' allegations and to prepare for trial.
+
+10.Next, C.M.A. concedes in her Opposition Motion to Discovery (DE 62) that Epstein is entitled to the information set out in 4(b) & (c) above; however, C.M.A. refuses to produce the information and/or allow the undersigned to list C.M.A.'s full name, date of birth and last four digits of her social security number in any third-party subpoenas in order to obtain those records.3 While this case was filed by C.M.A. on February 23, 2008, Epstein has been prevented from deposing any of the individuals that treated Plaintiff at one time or another!' This results directly from C.M.A.'s tactics to delay and prevent meaningful discovery in hopes that C.M.A. will be able to prevent Epstein from putting on any evidence in defense of his case. The remaining Plaintiffs
+
+<sup>&#</sup>x27; Attorney, Brad , in case number 08-CIV-080893, agreed to such a procedure. Counsel for Jane Does 2-7, Stuart Mermelstein, refuses to agree to such a procedure and, therefore, continues to substantially delay discovery. Note, many of the Plaintiffs are witnesses in the related cases. Therefore, Plaintiffs' discovery delays negatively effect the progress and trial preparation of each case.
+
+<sup>4</sup> This same argument applies to Jane does 2-7.
+
+have the same exact goal. Epstein cannot defend this matter with the element of unfair and prejudicial "surprise" is ever so present. Schearbrook Land and Livestock Company v. U.S. et. al, 124 F.R.D. 221 (M.D. Fla. 1988).
+
+11.ln an effort to move these cases forward and obtain meaningful discovery, Epstein filed his Motion to Compel and Motion to Compel and/or Identify CMA (and Jane Does 2-7) in the Style of this Case and Motion to Identify Them in Third-Party Subpoenas ("Motions to Identify"). The Motions to Identify are incorporated herein by reference and, for the court's edification, same remain outstanding. Should this Court grant the Motions to Identify, Epstein will be able to obtain discovery he does not currently have in his possession and will be able to take certain depositions of individuals that have yet to be identified.5 Based upon the court's consolidation order, the motion to identify equally applies to C.M.A. and the other Plaintiffs.
+
+12. Plaintiffs must be identified in other third-party subpoenas (unrelated to those discussed above concerning medical treatment) in order for Epstein to conduct meaningful discovery. Epstein's right to conduct discovery and confront the witnesses has, up through today's date, been unreasonably and unduly restricted as a result of Plaintiffs' delay tactics.
+
+13. Finally, the information sought in number 4(e) above has not been produced by C.M.A. or the remaining Plaintiffs, despite the case law favoring production. United
+
+<sup>5</sup> In a state court matter filed against Epstein, E.W. v. Epstein, Case No.: 50.2008-CA-028058 XXXXMB AD, the undersigned learned through discovery that the Plaintiff in that case worked at Platinum Gold, Curves Cabaret, Platinum Showgirls, Cheetah, Diamond Dolls, Vegas Cabaret, Spearmint Rhino, Ts Lounge, Pure Platinum, Solid Gold, and The Body Shop. Substantial discovery will take place in that matter of E.W.'s co-workers, supervisors and others that may have information regarding the claims she asserted against Epstein. Epstein should be afforded that same right in the instant matters.
+
+States v. Bear Stops, <sup>997</sup>F.2d 451 (8th Cir. 1993); Balas v. Ruzzo <sup>703</sup>So.2d <sup>1076</sup> (Fla. 5th DCA 1997), rev. denied, 719 So.2d 286 (Fla. 1998). The information sought in 4(e) is relevant and discoverable even if not admissible at trial. See Motion to Compel and Reply (C.M.A. DE 54 & 70). Once Plaintiffs are required to fully answer the interrogatories, the answers may yield (at alater deposition or through paper discovery): (a) the names of individuals that may have information about Plaintiffs that negate the allegations in their Complaints, (b) how certain acts alleged in their Complaints materially affected their relationships with others or how those acts did not have such an affect on those relationships, and (3) whether Plaintiffs suffered from disorders (e.g., C.M.A.'s claims of bi-polar disorder and manic depression) as a result of other sexual acts prior to the acts alleged in the Complaints. Here, evidence of Plaintiffs' sexual activity with others may show that those sexual activities (which could include assaults once delineated) produced the behaviors that, for instance, C.M.A. attributes to Epstein (e.g., bi-polar and manic depression disorders). Accordingly, answers to the above discovery requests go the heart of Plaintiffs' damages or lack thereof.
+
+14. Further, pursuant to this Courts Order (C.M.A. DE 68 and in the related matters), Epstein is permitted only to take the Plaintiffs' depositions one time, both as a witness in the other related matters and as <sup>a</sup>plaintiff in their particular matters. As a result, the discovery schedule coupled with Plaintiffs' delay tactics and the Order (DE 68) is forcing Epstein to take each of the Plaintiffs' depositions without the benefit of other discovery and depositions of individuals that may have knowledge of the claims asserted by Plaintiffs. As such, in the event Plaintiffs produce information after their depositions, this Court's order (DE 68) and the Federal Rules effectively prevent Epstein from taking Plaintiffs' depositions a second time. This is inherently unfair and prejudicial to Epstein.
+
+# a. Memorandum of Law
+
+15.Modifying a trial order and the deadlines/schedules thereunder is within the sound discretion of this court. Under the circumstances outlined above, failure to strike these cases from the current docket, continue the trials, and/or to modify the court's scheduling order will prejudice Epstein. Epstein has diligently attempted to comply with the Court's scheduling order but has effectively been prevented from doing so in light of the Plaintiffs' delay tactics during discovery. See supra; Fed.R.Civ.Pro. 16(b)(4)• Altadis USA, Inc. v. NPR, Inc., 2004 WL 444533 (M.D. Fla.)(granting motion to extend discovery and continue trial).
+
+16. Epstein has shown good cause to obtain a continuance of the trial of this matter and, as well, has shown good cause in order for this court to modify the scheduling order. Fed.R.Civ.Pro. 16(b)(4)("A [scheduling order] may be modified only for good cause and with the judge's consent."). Epstein's counsel has complied with Local Rule 7.6 of the U.S. Southern District by executing and providing the attached Affidavit. Exhibit "A". Epstein cannot, despite his diligence, timely complete discovery by the times outlined in the current scheduling order as a result of the Plaintiffs' delay tactics. Thus, as outlined above, failure to strike these cases from the docket, continue this case to the next available docket and to extend the discovery schedule and remaining deadlines will prejudice Epstein. Epstein has simply not been given the opportunity to obtain and/or conduct any meaningful discovery, which violates Epstein's constitutional
+
+due process right to defend himself and to seek the production of information that will assist in his defense of the allegations in respective complaints. Plaintiffs cannot reasonably expect Epstein to try these matters with having only been afforded the opportunity to take the deposition of one Plaintiff and not conduct any meaningful discovery on others.
+
+WHEREFORE, Epstein, through his counsel, requests that this court enter and Order:
+
+- a. striking these cases from the current trial docket;
+- b. continuing the trials of these matters and setting same on new trial dockets at least three months after the current trial dates; or, alternatively,
+- c. modifying the current trial schedule to allow for an additional 3 months from the currently set date within which to complete discovery, an additional 2 months from the currently set date within which to complete all substantive pretrial motions, an additional month from the currently set date within which to mediate this matter; and an additional month to complete the remaining deadlines under each of the Court's Trial Orders; and
+- d. for such other and further relief as this co deems just and proper.
+
+By: ROBERT ON, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar No. 224162 rcrit@bcIclaw.com MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296
+
+**Certificate of Service**
+
+I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record identified on the following Service List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on this 19 day of May, 2009
+
+Richard Horace Willits, Esq.  
+Richard H. Willits, P.A.  
+2290 10<sup>th</sup> Avenue North  
+Suite 404  
+Lake Worth, FL 33461  
+561-582-7600  
+Fax: 561-588-8819  
+Counsel for Plaintiff C.M.A.  
+reelrhw@hotmail.com
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq.  
+Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.  
+250 Australian Avenue South  
+Suite 1400  
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012  
+561-659-8300  
+Fax: 561-835-8691  
+jagesq@bellsouth.net  
+Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
+
+Jack Scarola, Esq.  
+Jack P. [REDACTED], Esq.  
+Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart &  
+Shipley, P.A.  
+2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard  
+West Palm Beach, FL 33409  
+561-686-6300  
+Fax: 561-383-9424  
+jsx@searcylaw.com  
+jph@searcylaw.com  
+Co-Counsel for Plaintiff
+
+Bruce Reinhart, Esq.  
+Bruce E. Reinhart, P.A.  
+250 S. Australian Avenue  
+Suite 1400  
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401  
+561-202-6360  
+Fax: 561-828-0983  
+ecf@brucereinhartlaw.com  
+Counsel for Defendant [REDACTED]
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+![]()West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+
+561/842-2820 Phone
+
+561/515-3148 Fax
+
+(Counsel for Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein)
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739930/EFTA02739930.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739930/EFTA02739930.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2f3c7e418fe008ab2dc95025e9ed69ba7e94a184
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739930/EFTA02739930.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,626 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739930.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 13,
+  "chars": 17682,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 6.81,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            199.512,
+            73.71000000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            406.36800000000005,
+            73.71000000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            406.36800000000005,
+            101.25
+          ],
+          [
+            199.512,
+            101.25
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's Motion To Strike Cases From Current Trial Docket \nAnd Motion to Continue Case And/Or Alternative Motion to Modify Trial and \nScheduling Order Deadlines",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            81.396,
+            554.04
+          ],
+          [
+            536.7239999999999,
+            554.04
+          ],
+          [
+            536.7239999999999,
+            597.2388763427734
+          ],
+          [
+            81.396,
+            597.2388763427734
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "I. Procedural Background and Argument'\nWith Incorporated Memorandum of Lawl",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            172.58399999999997,
+            305.37
+          ],
+          [
+            442.476,
+            305.37
+          ],
+          [
+            442.476,
+            334.7320556640625
+          ],
+          [
+            172.58399999999997,
+            334.7320556640625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "a. Memorandum of Law",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 9,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            258.876,
+            168.48
+          ],
+          [
+            405.4081726074219,
+            168.48
+          ],
+          [
+            405.4081726074219,
+            185.04998779296875
+          ],
+          [
+            258.876,
+            185.04998779296875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Certificate of Service",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 11,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            241.74,
+            111.78000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            364.75199999999995,
+            111.78000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            364.75199999999995,
+            125.55000000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            241.74,
+            125.55000000000001
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            91
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            85
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            24
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            154
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            20
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            287
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            373
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            369
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            36
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            60
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            63
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            29
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            353
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 9,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 10,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            55
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 11,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            15
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 12,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            15
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739930"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739943/EFTA02739943.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739943/EFTA02739943.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..19ffc8c613171c612a7b255ef66403b3c9d25572
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739943/EFTA02739943.md
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-80232-CIV-MARRA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN
+
+Defendant.
+
+/
+
+## ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO WITHDRAW AS CO-COUNSEL
+
+THIS CAUSE having come to be heard on the Motion for Leave to Withdraw as Co-Counsel, and this Court being fully advised, it is hereby:
+
+ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion is hereby granted.
+
+DONE AND ORDERED in at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this day of 2009.
+
+> KENNETH A. MARRA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
+
+Copies furnished to: All Counsel of Record
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739943/EFTA02739943.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739943/EFTA02739943.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4676bde056fc7ee5fddda378fa219cc3a2d1d06f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739943/EFTA02739943.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739943.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 1,
+  "chars": 592,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 0.71,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            202.572,
+            72.08999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            435.3429260253906,
+            72.08999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            435.3429260253906,
+            104.6214599609375
+          ],
+          [
+            202.572,
+            104.6214599609375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE \nTO WITHDRAW AS CO-COUNSEL",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            164.01600000000002,
+            327.24
+          ],
+          [
+            449.387939453125,
+            327.24
+          ],
+          [
+            449.387939453125,
+            360.3714599609375
+          ],
+          [
+            164.01600000000002,
+            360.3714599609375
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            41
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            21
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739943"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739944/EFTA02739944.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739944/EFTA02739944.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b490b32dccc7dc5b9f5a2adcdbad67443ec83912
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739944/EFTA02739944.md
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-80232-CIV-MARRA/
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN
+
+Defendant.
+
+## MOTION FOR LEAVE TO WITHDRAW AS CO-COUNSEL
+
+TEIN, P.L. hereby moves for leave to withdraw as co-counsel for defendant Jeffrey Epstein, stating as follows:
+
+- 1. On December 30, 2008, Tein filed its notice of withdrawal as counsel for Mr. Epstein [DE 47], noting that two other law firms who previously entered their appearance on Mr. Epstein's behalf would remain as co-counsel.
+- 2. We have since learned through discussions with the Clerk of Court that absent a formal order of withdrawal by this Court, Tein will continue to be listed as counsel for Mr. Epstein on the CM/ECF.
+- 3. Accordingly, Tein respectfully requests that this Court enter an order allowing it to withdraw as counsel for Mr. Epstein.
+
+- Tein
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+TEIN, P.L. 3059 Grand Avenue, Suite 340 Coconut Grove, Florida 33133 Tel: 305 442 1101 Fax: 305 442 6744
+
+By: Is/Michael R. Tein GUY A. Fla. Bar No. 623740 MICHAEL R. TEIN Fla. Bar No. 993522 tein@lewistein.com
+
+## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
+
+I HEREBY CERTIFY that on May 19, 2009, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court by using the CM/ECF system. I further certify that plaintiff's attorneys are CM/ECF participants, as indicated by the CM/ECF Attorney Listings for this case.
+
+> Is/ Michael R. Tein Michael R. Tein
+
+## Service List
+
+Jeffrey M. Herman, Esq. Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Herman & Mermelstein, P.A. 18205 Biscayne Blvd, Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160
+
+Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. Atterbery, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
+
+Robert D. Critton, Esq. Michael J. Pike, Esq. Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, LLP 515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
+
+![](_page_2_Picture_7.jpeg)
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739944/EFTA02739944.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739944/EFTA02739944.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4b573f7b1ea082a5a42f8f49dfb18ff24b1b56ab
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739944/EFTA02739944.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,245 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739944.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 3,
+  "chars": 1925,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 0.82,
+  "image_assets": [
+    "_page_2_Picture_7.jpeg"
+  ],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            184.82399999999998,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            417.3464050292969,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            417.3464050292969,
+            104.75091552734375
+          ],
+          [
+            184.82399999999998,
+            104.75091552734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "MOTION FOR LEAVE TO WITHDRAW AS CO-COUNSEL",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            116.28,
+            338.58
+          ],
+          [
+            496.6091613769531,
+            338.58
+          ],
+          [
+            496.6091613769531,
+            355.6209411621094
+          ],
+          [
+            116.28,
+            355.6209411621094
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            210.52799999999996,
+            361.26
+          ],
+          [
+            402.5826416015625,
+            361.26
+          ],
+          [
+            402.5826416015625,
+            378.5009460449219
+          ],
+          [
+            210.52799999999996,
+            378.5009460449219
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Service List",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            268.05600000000004,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            344.5530700683594,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            344.5530700683594,
+            88.62091064453125
+          ],
+          [
+            268.05600000000004,
+            88.62091064453125
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            47
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            24
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            43
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            22
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Picture",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739944"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739944/_page_2_Picture_7.jpeg b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739944/_page_2_Picture_7.jpeg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fe559f03facb7d1195cb515b1f26a4f6acd19fa1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739944/_page_2_Picture_7.jpeg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:2f2f9ab17c260860bfd0bab5156c614d0b1330a81f4ed86e654417d4cd6cb2af
+size 2430
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739947/EFTA02739947.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739947/EFTA02739947.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fd3a090f89e961fe4ee8bf4528bb8c99a080853f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739947/EFTA02739947.md
@@ -0,0 +1,199 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 2
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 4
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 5
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA'
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRA I
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80381-MARRA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 6
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 7
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+C.M.A.
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80994-MARRA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80993-MARRA/
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-MARRA/
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80893-MARRA
+
+DOE II
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 101
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 102
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+CASE NO.: 09-CV-80469-MARRA/M=
+
+CASE NO.: 09-CV-80591-MARRA/
+
+CASE NO.: 09-CV-80656-MARRM
+
+PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF FILING WITHDRAWAL OF PREVIOUSLY RAISED OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S, MOTION TO COMPEL AND/OR IDENTIFY C.M.A. IN THE STYLE OF THIS CASE AND MOTION TO IDENTIFY C.M.A. IN THIRD-PARTY SUBPOENAS FOR PURPOSES OF DISCOVERY, OR, ALTERNATIVELY, MOTION TO DISMISS SUA SPONTE, WITH INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW
+
+Plaintiff, C.M.A., by and through her undersigned attorneys, hereby files notice of withdrawal of previously raised objections to Defendant, JEFRREY EPSTEIN'S, Motion
+
+to Compel and/or Identify C.M.A. in the Style of This Case and Motion to Identify C.M.A. in Third-Party Subpoenas For Purposes of Discovery, or, Alternatively, Motion to Dismiss Sua Sponte, With Incorporated Memorandum of Law, and further states as follows:
+
+1. Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, filed a Motion to Compel and/or Identify C.M.A. in the Style of This Case and Motion to Identify C.M.A. in Third-Party Subpoenas For Purposes of Discovery, or, Alternatively, Motion to Dismiss Sua Sponte, With Incorporated Memorandum of Law (D.E. 67) on April 29, 2009.
+
+2. EPSTEIN's Motion seeks the following relief (taken verbatim from the conclusion of his Motion):
+
+- a) "That C.M.A. be identified by her legal name in the style of this case;
+- b) That Epstein be granted leave to identify C.M.A. by her legal name in Third-Party Subpoenas (but not file them in Court, or, if required, in a redacted form); and
+- c) That on an alternative basis, this court dismiss this action Sua Sponte until such time as C.M.A. identifies herself in the style of this matter.
+
+Doe v. Rostker 89 F.R.D at 163."
+
+3. Plaintiff withdraws her objection to a) and b) requested above. The request to have C.M.A.'s case dismissed is rendered moot given C.M.A.'s acquiescence to a) and b). To the extent that it is not, however, C.M.A. continues to object to c) above.
+
+4. Counsel for EPSTEIN is free to prepare a proposed agreed order reflecting the above for the Court's consideration following the undersigned's review of same.
+
+## CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL RULE 7.1
+
+Counsel for the movant conferred via telephone with counsel for the Defendant regarding the filing of the instance Notice and he has no objection to Plaintiff filing same.
+
+s/ Jack P.
+
+## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
+
+I HEREBY CERTIFY that on the 20th day of May, 2009, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court by using CM/ECF system, which will send a notice of electronic filing to all counsel of record on the attached service list.
+
+> istlank P ■ Jack Scarola Florida Bar No.: 169440 Jack P. Florida El No.: 0547808 Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 Fax: (561) 383-9424 Attorneys for Plaintiff, C.M.A.
+
+**COUNSEL LIST**
+
+Richard H. Willits, Esquire
+
+Richard H. Willits, P.A.
+
+2290 10th Avenue North, Suite 404
+
+Lake Worth, FL 33461
+
+Phone: (561) 582-7600
+
+Fax: (561) 588-8819
+
+Robert Critton, Esquire
+
+Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman LLP
+
+515 North Flagler Drive, Suite 400
+
+West Palm Beach, FL 33414
+
+Phone: (561) 842-2820
+
+Fax: (561) 844-6929
+
+Jack A. Goldberger, Esquire
+
+Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
+
+250 Australian Avenue South
+
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+
+Phone: (561) 863-9100
+
+Bruce E. Reinhart, Esquire
+
+Bruce E. Reinhart, P.A.
+
+250 South Australian Avenue
+
+Suite 1400
+
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+
+Phone: (561) 202-6360
+
+Fax: (561) 828-0983
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739947/EFTA02739947.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739947/EFTA02739947.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1c9f964d86127c8513278ff3d4087df9a7ccd43a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739947/EFTA02739947.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,333 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739947.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 6,
+  "chars": 4493,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 4.77,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            199.512,
+            85.05
+          ],
+          [
+            406.3868103027344,
+            85.05
+          ],
+          [
+            406.3868103027344,
+            114.54998779296875
+          ],
+          [
+            199.512,
+            114.54998779296875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL RULE 7.1",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            159.12,
+            170.91
+          ],
+          [
+            484.9326477050781,
+            170.91
+          ],
+          [
+            484.9326477050781,
+            186.91998291015625
+          ],
+          [
+            159.12,
+            186.91998291015625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            222.768,
+            336.15
+          ],
+          [
+            385.1254577636719,
+            336.15
+          ],
+          [
+            385.1254577636719,
+            351.91998291015625
+          ],
+          [
+            222.768,
+            351.91998291015625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "COUNSEL LIST",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            253.36799999999997,
+            88.28999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            347.00399999999996,
+            88.28999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            347.00399999999996,
+            103.68
+          ],
+          [
+            253.36799999999997,
+            103.68
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            57
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            20
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            20
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            57
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            29
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            20
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            49
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            24
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            52
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            48
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739947"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739953/EFTA02739953.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739953/EFTA02739953.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5d35ea3d9102bf7feb517cceee0d82f5e9a6defd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739953/EFTA02739953.md
@@ -0,0 +1,164 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 2,
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 4, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 5, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80381-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MAR
+
+JANE DOE NO. 6, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80994-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 7,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+C.M.A., CASE NO.: 08- CV-8081 I -MARRA
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+CASE NO.: 08- CV-80993-MARRA,
+
+JANE DOE,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN, et al.,
+
+Defendant.
+
+DOE II, CASE NO.: 08-CV- 80469-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+CASE NO.: 08- CV-80893-MARRA,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN et al..
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 101, CASE NO.: 08- CV-80591-MARRa
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 102, CASE NO.: 08- CV-80656-MARRa
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## PLAINTIFFS' JANE DOES 2-7 MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL AND/OR IDENTIFY JANE DOE IN THE STYLE ET AL.
+
+Plaintiffs, JANE DOES 2-7, by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby file this Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Defendant's Motion to Compel and/or Identify Jane Doe in the Style of this Case and Motion to Identify Jane Doe in Third Party Subpoenas for Purposes of Discovery, or Alternatively Motion to Dismiss Sua Sponte, and state as follows:
+
+- I. Defendant Epstein filed his Motion to Compel and/or Identify Jane Doe in the Style, et al., in the cases brought by Jane Does No. 2-7 ("Does 2-7") on May 5 and 6, 2009. Under S.D.Fla.L.R. 7.1(C), Does No. 2-7' response is due on May 22, 2009.
+  - 2. Plaintiffs request an additional twenty (20) days to respond to the Motion to
+
+Compel and/or Identify Jane Doe in the Style, et at This request for enlargement of time of twenty (20) days is necessitated primarily by Plaintiffs desire to have the psychiatric expert who examined the Plaintiffs consider the issue of their public identification and, if appropriate, submit an expert declaration in response to the relief sought in the Defendant's Motion. The enlargement of time requested is sought to provide the expert with adequate time to perform this work.
+
+3. Additionally, Plaintiffs' counsel has conflicts with other cases and matters which necessitate additional time for a response, including, without limitation, a special set hearing and upcoming trial in John Doe 6 v. Diocese of Orlando, case no. 48-2005-010138-0, Ninth Judicial Circuit for Orange County, Florida; and an upcoming deadline to file Appellant's initial Brief in Jane Doe v. Florida International University Board of Trustees case no. 3D09-414, Florida Third District Court of Appeals.
+
+4. Plaintiffs' counsel has conferred with Defendant's counsel, Robert Critton and Michael Pike, regarding this request for extension of time. While Defendant's counsel represented that Defendant would consent to an extension of time of one (1) week, until May 29, 2009, Defendant opposes any further extension of time. The grounds stated by Defendant's counsel for opposing the extension of time requested concern the relief sought in Defendant's Motion to Strike Cases from the Current Trial Docket, filed on May 19, 2009.
+
+WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs Jane Doe Nos. 2-7 respectfully request an enlargement of time until June 11, 2009 to file their response to Defendant's Motion to Compel and/or Identify Jane Doe in the Style, et at, and for such other and further relief this Court deems just and proper.
+
+Dated: May 21, 2009 Respectfully submitted,
+
+By: s/ Stuart S. Mermelstein
+
+Stuart S. Mermelstein (FL Bar No. 947245)
+
+ssm@sexabuseattorney.com
+
+Adam D. Horowitz (FL Bar No. 376980)
+
+ahorowitz@sexabuseattomey.com
+
+MERMELSTEIN & HOROWITZ, P.A.
+
+Attorneys for Plaintiffs
+
+18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218
+
+Miami, Florida 33160
+
+Tel: (305) 931-2200
+
+Fax: (305) 931-0877
+
+## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
+
+I hereby certify that on May 21, 2009, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CIVI/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day to all parties on the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those parties who are not authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing.
+
+/s/ Stuart S. Mermelstein
+
+## SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. igoldberger@agwpa.com
+
+Robert D. Critton, Esq. rcritton@bciclaw.com
+
+/s/ Stuart S. Mermelstein
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739953/EFTA02739953.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739953/EFTA02739953.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a08b7e892602d14d7c6e14409afe35b57414fb1a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739953/EFTA02739953.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,345 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739953.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 6,
+  "chars": 4833,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.63,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            408.26995849609375,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            408.26995849609375,
+            100.10302734375
+          ],
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            100.10302734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "PLAINTIFFS' JANE DOES 2-7 MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT \nOF TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL \nAND/OR IDENTIFY JANE DOE IN THE STYLE ET AL.",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            117.50399999999999,
+            443.88
+          ],
+          [
+            494.67584228515625,
+            443.88
+          ],
+          [
+            494.67584228515625,
+            486.363037109375
+          ],
+          [
+            117.50399999999999,
+            486.363037109375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            227.052,
+            262.44
+          ],
+          [
+            386.89947509765625,
+            262.44
+          ],
+          [
+            386.89947509765625,
+            277.10302734375
+          ],
+          [
+            227.052,
+            277.10302734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "SERVICE LIST \nDOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN \nUnited States District Court, Southern District of Florida",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            156.67200000000003,
+            70.47
+          ],
+          [
+            455.1346740722656,
+            70.47
+          ],
+          [
+            455.1346740722656,
+            113.9830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            156.67200000000003,
+            113.9830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            20
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            57
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            15
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            57
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            38
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            19
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            11
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            21
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            11
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739953"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739959/EFTA02739959.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739959/EFTA02739959.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..473d2f05716d328babec874efbb8ae780acfc009
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739959/EFTA02739959.md
@@ -0,0 +1,111 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+/
+
+JANE DOE NO. 4, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MAR
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 5, CASE NO.: 08-CV-8038I-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 6, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80994-MARRA
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 7, CASE NO.: 08- CV-80993-MARRA,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+/
+
+C.M.A., CASE NO.: 08- CV-80811 -MARIZA/ I
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE, CASE NO.: 08- CV-80893-MAR
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN, et al.,
+
+Defendant.
+
+DOE II, CASE NO.: 08-CV- 80469-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN et al.,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 101, CASE NO.: 08- CV-80591-MARRA.
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 102, CASE NO.: 08- CV-80656-MARRAr
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## ORDER
+
+Upon Plaintiffs' Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Defendant's Motion to Compel and/or Identify Jane Doe in the Style of this Case and Motion to Identify Jane Doe in Third Party Subpoenas for Purposes of Discovery, or Alternatively Motion to Dismiss Sua Sponte, and good cause being shown, it is hereby
+
+ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion is granted. Plaintiffs shall have an enlargement of time of twenty (20) days until June 11, 2009, to respond to the Defendant's Motions to Compel and/or Identify Jane Doe in the Style, a at.
+
+DONE AND ORDERED in at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this day of , 2009.
+
+DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739959/EFTA02739959.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739959/EFTA02739959.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1b7e3c77413b209b80029208d4c6e4171d7b6289
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739959/EFTA02739959.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,177 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739959.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 3,
+  "chars": 1727,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.4,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            205.02,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            408.26995849609375,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            408.26995849609375,
+            115.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            205.02,
+            115.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "ORDER",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            280.908,
+            379.89
+          ],
+          [
+            330.7633361816406,
+            379.89
+          ],
+          [
+            330.7633361816406,
+            394.863037109375
+          ],
+          [
+            280.908,
+            394.863037109375
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            24
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            29
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            45
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            23
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            14
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739959"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739962/EFTA02739962.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739962/EFTA02739962.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..169d0431d0fe3b2cab9869c8d49107060200cbb0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739962/EFTA02739962.md
@@ -0,0 +1,135 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 4, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 5, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80381-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+/
+
+JANE DOE NO. 6, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80994-MARR
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 7,
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+C.M.A., CASE NO.: 08- CV-80811 -MARRA I
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE, CASE NO.: 08- CV-80893-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN, et al.,
+
+Defendant.
+
+CASE NO.: 08- CV-80993-MARRA
+
+DOE II, CASE NO.: 08-CV- 80469-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN et al.,
+
+Defendant. /
+
+JANE DOE NO. 101, CASE NO.: 08- CV-80591-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant. /
+
+JANE DOE NO. 102, CASE NO.: 08- CV-80656-MARRA I
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant. /
+
+## NOTICE OF FILING PROPOSED ORDER
+
+Plaintiffs, Jane Does 2-7, by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby file the attached Proposed Order in reference to document no. ill filed in case no. 08-80119 on May 21, 2009.
+
+Dated: May 27, 2009 Respectfully submitted,
+
+By: s/ Adam D. Horowitz Stuart S. Mermelstein (FL Bar No. 947245) ssm@sexabuseattorney.com Adam D. Horowitz (FL Bar No. 376980) ahorowitz@sexabuseattorney.com MERMELSTEIN & HOROWITZ, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiffs 18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218
+
+Miami, Florida 33160
+
+Tel: (305) 931-2200
+
+Fax: (305) 931-0877
+
+## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
+
+I hereby certify that on May 27, 2009, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day to all parties on the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those parties who are not authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing.
+
+/s/ Adam D. Horowitz
+
+## SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. izoldberger@agwpa.com
+
+Robert D. Critton, Esq. rcritton@bc1claw.com
+
+James bedwards@rra-law.com
+
+Isidro Manuel isidrogarcia@bellsouth.net
+
+Jack iah@searcvlaw.com Katherine Warthen Ezell KEzell@podhurst.com U
+
+Michael James Pike MPike@bciclaw.com
+
+Paul G. Cassell cassellp@law.utah.edu
+
+Richard Horace Willits lawyerwillits@aol.com
+
+Robert C. Josefsberg rjosefsberg@podhurst.com
+
+/s/ Adam D. Horowitz
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739962/EFTA02739962.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739962/EFTA02739962.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2d38f9b4969990fb5b8c0987ce15bbe7e2210e5a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739962/EFTA02739962.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,337 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739962.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 6,
+  "chars": 2707,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.43,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            98.82
+          ],
+          [
+            406.3418273925781,
+            98.82
+          ],
+          [
+            406.3418273925781,
+            127.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            127.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "NOTICE OF FILING PROPOSED ORDER",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            207.46800000000002,
+            457.65
+          ],
+          [
+            440.6433410644531,
+            457.65
+          ],
+          [
+            440.6433410644531,
+            472.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            207.46800000000002,
+            472.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            227.052,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            385.39947509765625,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            385.39947509765625,
+            85.863037109375
+          ],
+          [
+            227.052,
+            85.863037109375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "SERVICE LIST \nDOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN \nUnited States District Court, Southern District of Florida",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            156.67200000000003,
+            70.47
+          ],
+          [
+            455.1346740722656,
+            70.47
+          ],
+          [
+            455.1346740722656,
+            113.9830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            156.67200000000003,
+            113.9830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            21
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            22
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            67
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            33
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            15
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            11
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            19
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            55
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739962"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739968/EFTA02739968.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739968/EFTA02739968.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..44c07de6940fe45d7b4e3fc4404c772f64e05015
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739968/EFTA02739968.md
@@ -0,0 +1,115 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant.
+
+/
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant.
+
+/
+
+JANE DOE NO. 4, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant.
+
+/
+
+JANE DOE NO. 5, CASE NO.: 08-CV-8038I-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 6, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80994-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 7, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80993-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant.
+
+J
+
+C.M.A., Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant.
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-MARRA/JOHNSON
+
+JANE DOE, Plaintiff,
+
+VS.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN et al, Defendants.
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80893-MARRA
+
+DOE II. Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN et al, Defendants.
+
+CASE NO.: 09-CV-80469-MARRa
+
+JANE DOE NO. 101, CASE NO.: 09-CV-8059 I -MARRA/
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 102 CASE NO.: 09-CV-80656-MARRia
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+VS.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant.
+
+## UNITED STATES' NOTICE OF LIMITED APPEARANCE AS AMICUS CURIAE TO FILE RESPONSE TO COURT'S ORDER REOUESTING POSITION ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STAY (DE 991
+
+Comes now the United States, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, and makes this limited appearance to file via CWECF its response to the Court's Order requesting the position of the United States on Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Stay Proceedings [DE 99]. By filing this notice of limited appearance and its response, the United States does not make itself a party to this litigation and takes no position with respect
+
+to the outcome of any of the civil suits. By filing this notice of limited appearance and response, the United States also does not waive any procedural or statutory bars to suit.
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
+
+By: s/A. Villa aiia A. VILLAFANA Assistant United States Attorney Florida Bar No. 0018255 500 East Broward Boulevard, 7th Floor Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33394 Telephone: 954-356-7255 Facsimile: 954-356-7230
+
+## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
+
+I HEREBY CERTIFY that on May 28, 2009, 1 electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. According to the Court's website, counsel for all parties are able to receive notice via the CM/ECF system.
+
+> s/A. Villa arta A. VILLAFARA Assistant United States Attorney
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739968/EFTA02739968.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739968/EFTA02739968.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..66628d853db5cb55202d0e8158e07b2696ac9fd4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739968/EFTA02739968.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,242 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739968.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 4,
+  "chars": 2473,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.14,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            198.288,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            414.0744934082031,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            414.0744934082031,
+            102.62200927734375
+          ],
+          [
+            198.288,
+            102.62200927734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES' NOTICE OF LIMITED APPEARANCE \nAS AMICUS CURIAE TO FILE RESPONSE TO COURT'S ORDER \nREOUESTING POSITION ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STAY (DE 991",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            85.68,
+            478.71
+          ],
+          [
+            528.49462890625,
+            478.71
+          ],
+          [
+            528.49462890625,
+            524.4919738769531
+          ],
+          [
+            85.68,
+            524.4919738769531
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            223.38,
+            355.59000000000003
+          ],
+          [
+            388.9211730957031,
+            355.59000000000003
+          ],
+          [
+            388.9211730957031,
+            372.11248779296875
+          ],
+          [
+            223.38,
+            372.11248779296875
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            20
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            52
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            18
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            13
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            45
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            23
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739968"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739972/EFTA02739972.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739972/EFTA02739972.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9935993a2e40806d2666b0a9c430cdad3cb5d19a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739972/EFTA02739972.md
@@ -0,0 +1,143 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant.
+
+/
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant.
+
+/
+
+JANE DOE NO. 4, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant.
+
+/
+
+JANE DOE NO. 5, CASE NO.: 08-CV-8038I-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 6, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80994-MARRAMI=
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 7, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80993-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant.
+
+C.M.A., Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE, Plaintiff,
+
+VS.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN et al, Defendants.
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-MARRA
+
+J
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80893-MARRA
+
+DOE II, Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN et al, Defendants.
+
+CASE NO.: 09-CV-80469-MARRa
+
+JANE DOE NO. 101, CASE NO.: 09-CV-80591-MARRA/JOHNSON
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 102 CASE NO.: 09-CV-80656-MARRA,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant.
+
+### UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO COURT'S ORDER REQUESTING POSITION ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STAY IDE 991
+
+Comes now the United States, by and through the undersigned Assistant United States Attorney, and files this response to the Court's Order requesting the position of the United States on Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Stay Proceedings [DE 99]. For the reasons set forth below, it is the United States' position that a stay of the proceedings is not necessary and was not contemplated by the Non-Prosecution Agreement between the United States and Defendant Jeffrey Epstein.
+
+## ISSUE PRESENTED
+
+The United States is not a party to these lawsuits and, accordingly, is not fully aware of the scope of the proceedings, the range of arguments presented by counsel, and any correspondence or oral communications between the parties in these civil suits. Based on the information presented by the Court and a review of Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Stay and/or Continue Action for Time Certain Based on Parallel Civil and Criminal Proceedings with Incorporated Memorandum of Law (Court File No. 08-CV-80811- MARRA/JOHNSON DE 51-1), and responses thereto filed by various plaintiffs in their suits, the undersigned understands that the Court has requested the position of the United States on the following issue:
+
+Are there "special circumstances" that require the imposition of a stay of the civil proceedings in the "interests of justice" until the "expiration" of the Non-Prosecution Agreement ["NPA"] between the United States and Epstein?
+
+By filing this response, the United States does not make itself a party to this litigation and takes no position with respect to the outcome of any of the civil suits; nor does the United States take any position regarding Defendant Epstein's performance of his obligations pursuant to the NPA. The United States also declines to comment on Defendant Epstein's representations regarding past allegations of violations of the NPA by Epstein. The United States files this response solely as amicus curiae at the Court's request and does not waive any procedural or statutory bars to suit.
+
+# I. STANDARD FOR IMPOSING A DISCRETIONARY STAY
+
+### A. The Defendant Must Show that the Assertion of His Fifth Amendment Privilege Against Self-Incrimination Would Automatically Result in the Entry of Summary Judgment Against Him.
+
+"The decision whether or not to stay civil litigation in deference to parallel criminal proceedings is discretionary.... A movant must carry a heavy burden to succeed in such an endeavor." Microfinancial, Inc. v. Premier Holidays Internat'l, Inc., 385 F.3d 72, 77 (1st Cir. 2004) (citations omitted). When a defendant facing possible criminal liability invokes his Fifth Amendment right against compelled self-incrimination in connection with civil litigation, a court can stay discovery or the entire civil case. v. Jenne, 2007 WL 624286 \*1 (S.D. Fl. Feb. 23, 2007) (Cooke, J.). "However, `the Constitution does not require a stay of civil proceedings pending the outcome of related criminal proceedings. Forcing an individual to risk non-criminal disadvantage by remaining silent for fear of self incrimination in a parallel criminal proceeding does not rise to the level of an unconstitutional infringement?" Id. (quoting Shell Oil Co. v. Altina Assocs., Inc., 866 F. Supp. 536, 540 (M.D. Fl. 1994)).
+
+As this Court has previously explained:
+
+The law regarding stays of civil actions is well-settled in the Eleventh Circuit. In United States v. Lot 5, Fox Grove, Alachua County, Fla, 23 F.3d 359, 363- 65 (11th Cir. 1994) ("Lot 5"), the Court articulated the following principles of law with respect to a stay of a civil action pending resolution of a related criminal action:
+
+[Al blanket assertion of the privilege is an inadequate basis for the issuance of a stay. Rather, a court must stay a civil
+
+proceeding pending resolution of a related criminal prosecution only when "special circumstances" so require in the "interests of justice." The court may deny a stay so long as the privilege's invocation does not compel an adverse judgment against the claimant.
+
+[T]he standard set by the Eleventh Circuit as to when a stay should be granted to prevent unconstitutional infringement is more narrow. The law in the Eleventh Circuit requires consideration of whether, as a result of invoking the privilege, the defendant faces certain loss of the civil proceeding on summary judgment if the civil proceeding were to continue. Lot 5, 23 F.3d at 364; Pervis v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., 901 F.2d 944 (1 1 th Cir. 1990). Under this standard, Movants must show that invocation of the privilege in the instant matter will result in certain loss by automatic summary judgment. United States v. Two Parcels of Real Property, 92 F.3d 1123, 1129 (11th Cir. 1996); Pervis, 901 F.2d at 946-47. This must be an actual adverse judgment, and not "merely the loss of the defendant's most 'effective defense.' Securities & Exchange Comm. v. lncendy, 936 F. Supp. at 955 (S.D. H. 1996); Shell Oil Co., 866 F. Supp. at 540-41.
+
+Court-Appointed Receiver of Lancer Mgt. Group LLC v. Lauer, 2009 WL 800144 (S.D. Fl. Mar. 25, 2009) (Marra, J.).
+
+Thus, before reaching the relative benefit and prejudice to each of the parties caused by staying the cases, the Court must determine whether, if defendant Epstein were to invoke his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination' and the Court were to allow an adverse inference to be drawn therefrom, an adverse judgment against Epstein would be automatically compelled. The United States respectfully submits that it would not.
+
+<sup>&#</sup>x27;It appears from a brief review of some of Epstein's discovery responses that Epstein has made a blanket assertion of the privilege. For example, Epstein has asserted his Fifth Amendment privilege in response to a plaintiff's request to produce the NPA and the United States' list of identified victims although these documents were provided to Epstein by the United States.
+
+From a review of the Complaints filed by the plaintiffs in these cases, it appears that some have filed claims based upon Title 18, United States Code, Section 2255, some have filed claims based upon common law torts, and some have filed a combination of the two. Under general principles of tort law, a plaintiff is required to prove: (1) that the defendant committed a bad act; (2) that the plaintiff suffered damages; and (3) that the damages were caused by the defendant's bad act. To succeed on a claim under 18 U.S.C. § 2255, a plaintiff must show: (I) that the plaintiff is a person who, while a minor, was a victim of an enumerated offense committed by the defendant; (2) that the person suffered personal injury as a result of that violation; and (3) the amount of damages she sustained.
+
+Epstein's assertion of his Fifth Amendment privilege could result in the drawing of a negative inference only as to the first element under both of these claims. Therefore, to succeed on summary judgment (or at trial), the plaintiffs would still have to prove that they suffered personal injury/damages as a result of the defendant's bad act. Cf. In re Financial Federated Title & Trust, Inc., 252 B.R. 834, 838 (S.D. Fl. Bank. Ct. 2000) (Stay not warranted in bankruptcy proceeding where criminal indictment was pending because negative inference related only to defendant's receipt of allegedly fraudulent transfers, but "Trustee must still carry the burden of proving all of the elements of his complaint for fraudulent transfers . includ[ingj fraudulent intent, insolvency, and financial condition at the time of the transfers to the Defendants.").
+
+While Epstein may believe that his arguments and proof as to the first element are his "most effective defense," that alone is insufficient to warrant the imposition of a stay of the
+
+litigation. There are two other items for the Court to consider in deciding this issue. First, pursuant to the terms of the NPA, as to those victims identified by the United States, Epstein has already made a concession that they are victims of an enumerated offense committed by Epstein. Thus, this inference is drawn not due to his invocation of the right against selfincrimination but due to his entry into a contractual agreement with the United States for which the identified victims are third-party beneficiaries.' Second, in Lot 5, the Eleventh Circuit pointed out the wealth of evidence other than the defendant's testimony that could be used to defeat a liability claim. See Lot 5, 23 F.3d at 364 ("Thus, Claimant's assertion that only her own testimony could vindicate her is groundless; other participants to the illegal acts that gave rise to the forfeiture were available to testify at trial. Claimant's failure to indicate with precision why she did not use other parties' testimony to substantiate her defense was fatal."). For example, Epstein could mount a defense using effective cross-examination, telephone records, travel records, documents within the possession of the plaintiffs or third parties, and/or the testimony of third parties to rebut the plaintiffs' proof.
+
+<sup>&#</sup>x27;The United States notes that it is not aware of the identities of all of the plaintiffs in the civil suits. To the extent that any are not &quot;identified victims&quot; under the NPA, this contractual provision would not apply.</p><h3>B. Additional Factors to Consider in Balancing the Prejudice to the Parties</h3><p block-type='Text'>If the Court is persuaded that the negative inference drawn from Epstein&#x27;s assertion of his Fifth Amendment privilege would result in an automatic grant of summary judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, then the Court must engage in a balancing of equities in determining whether there are &quot;special circumstances&quot; warranting the imposition of a stay &quot;&#x27;to prevent a party from suffering substantial and irreparable prejudice.&quot; Securites and Exchange Comm&#x27;n v. Incendy, 936 F. Supp. 952, 956 (S.D. FL 1996) (quoting S.E.C. v. First Financial Group of Texas, Inc., 659 F.2d 660, 668 (5th Cir. 1981) (add&#x27;/ citations omitted).</p><p block-type='Text'>Examples of &quot;special circumstances&quot; provided by the Supreme Court in [United States v. Kordel] are: (1) if the Government brought the civil action solely to obtain evidence for its criminal prosecution, (2) if the Government failed to advise the defendant in the civil proceeding that it contemplates his criminal prosecution; (3) if the defendant is without counsel or reasonably fears prejudice from adverse pretrial publicity or other unfair injury; or (4) any other special circumstances indicating unconstitutionality or even impropriety.</p><p block-type='Text'>Incendy at 956 (citing United States v. Kordel, 397 U.S. 1, 11 (1970)). See also Securities and Exchange Comm&#x27;n v. 261 Fed. Appx. 259, 263 (11th Cir. 2008) (&quot;[N]o &#x27;special circumstances&#x27; existed in this case warranting a stay, as there is no record evidence suggesting the Government had brought the civil case solely to obtain evidence for the criminal prosecution or that the criminal case against [defendant] was unconstitutional or inappropriately instituted.&quot;).</p><p block-type='Text' class='has-continuation'>No &quot;special circumstances&quot; exist here. First, unlike and Incendy, the United States Government is not a party to the civil litigation. Each suit is brought on behalf of an</p><p block-type='Text'>individual plaintiff represented by private counsel. Some of those plaintiffs are adverse to the United States and have filed suit against the Government based upon its handling of the criminal case against Epstein. (See In re Jane Doe Litigation, Court File No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra.) There has been no allegation, and certainly no showing, that the civil litigation is a ruse to obtain discovery on behalf of the criminal investigation.</p><p block-type='Text' class='has-continuation'>As some of the plaintiffs have mentioned, one purpose of the NPA was to place the identified victims in the same position where they would have been if Epstein had been convicted after trial of an offense enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255. (See, e.g., Court File No. 08-CV-80119 DE 49-2.) If Epstein had proceeded to trial and been convicted, those victims would have been entitled to restitution and to file suit pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255, and would have been entitled to the same sorts of discovery that they now seek. None of the plaintiffs has contacted the United States about passing on materials gathered through discovery to any criminal investigators or about seeking discovery that would be relevant only to the criminal proceedings, rather than to their individual cases. If Epstein has legitimate concerns that the civil discovery process is being abused in some way, he can ask the Court for a protective order limiting the scope of discovery or its distribution. Furthermore, if at some time in the future, Epstein were the subject of a criminal indictment and he alleged that the evidence to be used against him was gathered improperly, he could file a motion to suppress or to dismiss the indictment in that criminal action. See, e.g., United States, ex. rel. Westrick v. Second Chance, 2007 WL 1020808 \*4 (D.D.C. Mar. 31, 2007) (Defendant in civil False Claims Act suit moved to stay civil action pending criminal</p><p block-type='Text'>investigation where no indictment had been returned. The district court denied the motion, noting that while &quot;allowing civil discovery to proceed may afford the government [who was the real party in interest in the civil case] the opportunity to gain evidence that it may not be entitled to under the more restrictive criminal discovery rules, if and when discovery becomes necessary, protective orders and other remedial measures may be taken.&quot;) (citations omitted).</p><p block-type='Text'>By entering into the NPA, with its explicit discussion of 18 U.S.C. § 2255, Epstein acknowledged that the United States was trying to protect the victims&#x27; rights to restitution and that civil claims would likely follow. Epstein did not bargain for a stay of those proceedings. Instead, both parties received benefits and gave consideration for the bargain that was struck — while Epstein is faced with answering discovery requests that he would not face during criminal proceedings, he also is entitled to the identification of and extensive discovery from the victims, which he would not have received in the criminal case. Based upon a review of the discovery requests he has promulgated thus far, it appears that Epstein is taking full advantage of this benefit and if a criminal case were ever filed, he would, no doubt, seek to use that information in his defense.&#x27;</p><p><sup>&#</sup>x27;With respect to the other &quot;special circumstances&quot; mentioned in Incendy, the government obviously advised Epstein of the potential for criminal charges, and that knowledge led to the negotiation of the NPA. Epstein also has a number of attorneys listed on the Service List for the civil cases and has retained a similarly large number of attorneys to handle the criminal investigation and negotiation of the NPA. Epstein alleges a fear of adverse publicity, but as the plaintiffs have pointed out, during the course of the state and federal criminal investigations, Epstein&#x27;s personal publicist distributed stories to the press impugning the credibility of the victims and other witnesses and averring that the victims&#x27; allegations of abuse were made solely to extract money from the defendant. In the context of some of the civil suits currently pending, Epstein has asked the Court</p><p block-type='Text'>Unlike and Incendy, Epstein also has not been criminally indicted. In some districts, this alone is virtually dispositive. See, e.g., Sterling Nat&#x27;l Bank v. A-I Hotels Internat&#x27;l, 175 F. Supp. 2d 573, 576-77 (S.D.N.Y. 2001) (&quot;district courts in this Circuit `generally grant the extraordinary remedy of a stay only after the defendant seeking a stay has been indicted.&#x27;&quot; (quoting Citibank, N.A. v. 1993 WL 481335 \*1 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 18, 1993) (add&#x27;/ citations omitted). As one court explained:</p><p block-type='Text'>the consensus that a party seeking a stay bears a heavier burden when he has not yet been indicted derives logically from the balancing test set out by the courts of appeals that have considered the question. When a defendant has been indicted, his situation is particularly dangerous, and takes a certain priority, for the risk to his liberty, the importance of safeguarding his constitutional rights, and even the strain on his resources and attention that makes defending satellite civil litigation particularly difficult, all weigh in favor of his interest. Moreover, if the potential prejudice to the defendant is particularly high post-indictment, the prejudice to the plaintiff of staying proceedings is somewhat reduced, since the criminal litigation has reached a crisis that will lead to a reasonably speedy resolution. Furthermore, at that stage in the criminal proceeding, the contours of the indictment will provide the Court with a reasonable basis for determining the extent of the threat to the defendant&#x27;s Fifth Amendment rights, and the likely extent and timing of the criminal litigation.</p><p block-type='Text'>Pre-indictment, these factors must be balanced significantly differently. Though many of the same risks to the civil defendant are present, the dangers are at least somewhat more remote, and it is inherently unclear to the Court just how much the unindicted defendant really has to fear. Conversely, the delay imposed on the plaintiff is potentially indefinite. There is no telling how complicated the government&#x27;s investigation may be, whether the allegations of the particular civil plaintiff are merely the tip of an iceberg that will result in a lengthy and open-ended investigation, what priority the government assigns to the investigation, whether it will result in charges that will have to</p><p block-type='Text'>to unseal the victims&#x27; names so that he may make use similar press efforts to impugn their credibility.</p><p block-type='Text'>be litigated, or how time-consuming the resulting criminal case will be. Under these circumstances, the likelihood that a civil party can make the necessary showing to obtain the &quot;extraordinary&quot; remedy of a stay is inevitably much reduced.</p><p block-type='Text'>Sterling Nat&#x27;l Bank, 175 F. Supp. 2d at 577 (internal citations omitted).</p><p block-type='Text'>The First Circuit has noted that the decision whether to grant a stay &quot;is highly nuanced ... [and] involves competing interests. Balancing these interests is a situation-specific task, and an inquiring court must take a careful look at the idiosyncratic circumstances of the case before it.&quot; Microfinancial, supra, 385 F.3d at 78. Epstein&#x27;s case is more idiosyncratic than most.</p><p block-type='Text'>As the Court aptly noted in its Order denying Epstein&#x27;s first motion to stay the civil proceedings, Epstein has not been indicted and there are no criminal proceedings pending against him.&#x27; The resurrection of criminal proceedings against Epstein lies entirely within Epstein&#x27;s own hands, by performing or not performing under the terms of the NPA. This tips the balance of equities even further in favor of the plaintiffs. Epstein makes allegations that the U.S. Attorney&#x27;s Office has unfettered discretion in determining breaches of the NPA, but this is no different than in any contractual setting. If one party believes that there has been a breach, it may seek the remedy set forth in the contract. If the other party believes that</p><p><sup>&#</sup>x27;Epstein points to provisions requiring him to maintain certain evidence &quot;inviolate&quot; as proof that the grand jury investigation is still active. These provisions are meant only to insure that easily destroyed evidence identified through the investigation, such as computer equipment, that is still in Epstein&#x27;s control, will still be available to investigators if Epstein does, in fact, breach the NPA. Epstein is well aware that litigation concerning those matters have been removed from the Court&#x27;s docket, at the insistence of the United States, because it fully halted its investigation in accordance with the terms of the NPA.</p><p block-type='Text'>there has been no breach, it has a remedy at law or equity. In this situation, Epstein would be entitled to seek dismissal of the indictment. See United States v. Beeks, 167 Fed. Appx 777 (1 1 th Cir. 2006); United States v. 138 Fed. Appx. 965 (9th Cir. 2005); United States v. , 393 F.3d 540 (5th Cir. 2004).</p><p block-type='Text'>Epstein argues that because he is seeking a finite period of delay — until the time that he asserts that the NPA &quot;expires&quot; — and that, thereafter, he will promptly provide full and complete responses to all discovery, the harm to the plaintiffs is de minimis. With all respect, this overlooks a number of obvious issues. First, if a stay is imposed until Epstein&#x27;s proposed &quot;expiration date,&quot; it affords Epstein one of two incentives: (a) to delay any intended breach until a time when he believes that the United States has no remedy and then to breach the agreement with impunity (Le, to use the NPA as a shield and a sword); or (b) to delay the civil litigation as long as possible (until shortly before the &quot;expiration&quot; of the NPA), and then, after criminal charges have been filed, to seek a mandatory stay of the civil cases until the criminal case is resolved. Thus, contrary to the assertions of Epstein, the delay is not limited but, instead, is &quot;potentially indefinite,&quot; as Sterling Bank warns. If the U.S. Attorney&#x27;s Office were to proceed criminally, the litigation would likely be very lengthy, and would result in an even greater delay to the plaintiffs.5</p><p><sup>&#</sup>x27;The United States also notes that this finite termination to Epstein&#x27;s exposure to potential criminal consequences is illusory. The NPA addresses only certain victims identified during the course of the government&#x27;s investigation. To the extent that any of the plaintiffs who have already filed suit against Epstein do not fall within that group, the NPA does not address potential charges based upon crimes committed against them. The NPA also does not bind any other state or federal prosecutor from pursuing charges for criminal acts committed within their jurisdiction(s). The federal statute of limitations for offenses against children is ten years or the life of the child,</p><p block-type='Text'>The factors to consider include: &quot;(i) the interests of the civil plaintiff in proceeding expeditiously with the civil litigation, including the avoidance of any prejudice to the plaintiff should a delay transpire; (ii) the hardship to the defendant, including the burden placed upon him should the cases go forward in tandem; (iii) the convenience of both the civil and criminal courts; (iv) the interests of third parties; . (v) the public interest[;] (vi) the good faith of the litigants (or the absence of it) and (vii) the status of the cases.&quot; Microfinancial, 385 F.3d at 78 (citations omitted).</p><p block-type='Text'>In considering those factors, the United States respectfully recommends to the Court that all of the factors weigh against a stay. In making its decision, the Court should consider that, unlike all of the cases cited herein, Epstein seeks to stay not one suit involving a single plaintiff, but more than a dozen suits filed by individual plaintiffs. Each of those plaintiffs, in turn, impliedly asserts that she is a &quot;crime victim&quot; with the &quot;right to full and timely restitution&quot; and the &quot;right to proceedings free from unreasonable delay.&quot; 18 U.S.C. § 3771(a)(6) &amp; (7). As noted above, one of the purposes of the NPA was to provide these rights to victims identified in the Government&#x27;s investigation. Thus, this factor weighs more heavily for the plaintiffs than in the average civil dispute as it embodies both the plaintiffs&#x27; and the public&#x27;s interests. The victims who were identified in the government investigation, by and large, were without financial assets and had significant counseling needs that could</p><p>whichever is longer. 18 U.S.C. § 3283. Thus, for Epstein (or any other person accused of sexually abusing children) to &quot;wait out&quot; any chance of criminal liability, the court would have to stay civil litigation until all of the plaintiffs have died.</p><p block-type='Text'>be remedied through obtaining restitution from Epstein. In addition to those needs, they have legitimate concerns about memories fading, witnesses becoming unavailable, and dissipation of Epstein&#x27;s assets while the matter is stayed. On the other hand, while the potential harm to the defendant normally weighs in the defendant&#x27;s favor, in this case, Epstein has significant control over whether the criminal investigation remains in abeyance and whether criminal charges are ever filed.</p><h1>CONCLUSION</h1><p block-type='Text'>In accordance with the Court&#x27;s Order, the United States hereby submits that it is not aware of any &quot;special circumstances&quot; that warrant staying all of the civil cases pending the &quot;expiration&quot; of the NPA.</p><p block-type='Text'>Respectfully submitted,</p><p block-type='Text'>R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA UNITED STATES ATTORNEY</p><p block-type='Text'>By: s/A. o r Villafafia A. VILLAFASA Assistant United States Attorney Florida Bar No. 0018255 500 East Broward Boulevard, 7th Floor Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33394 Telephone: 954-356-7255 Facsimile: 954-356-7230</p><h4>CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE</h4><p block-type='Text'>I HEREBY CERTIFY that on May 28, 2009, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. According to the Court&#x27;s website, counsel for all parties are able to receive notice via the CM/ECF system.</p><blockquote><p block-type='Text'>Villafaiia A. VILLAFARA Assistant United States Attorney</p></blockquote>
+ </body>
+</html></sup>
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739972/EFTA02739972.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739972/EFTA02739972.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8f787f75d49cec0ba5d7bba6d9d2ae743044c765
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739972/EFTA02739972.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,839 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739972.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 17,
+  "chars": 27504,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 2.01,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            198.288,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            414.0744934082031,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            414.0744934082031,
+            102.62200927734375
+          ],
+          [
+            198.288,
+            102.62200927734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO COURT'S ORDER \nREQUESTING POSITION ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STAY IDE 991",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            85.68,
+            478.71
+          ],
+          [
+            528.49462890625,
+            478.71
+          ],
+          [
+            528.49462890625,
+            509.4919738769531
+          ],
+          [
+            85.68,
+            509.4919738769531
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "ISSUE PRESENTED",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            244.188,
+            72.08999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            368.74652099609375,
+            72.08999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            368.74652099609375,
+            87.62200927734375
+          ],
+          [
+            244.188,
+            87.62200927734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "I. STANDARD FOR IMPOSING A DISCRETIONARY STAY",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            105.26399999999998,
+            72.08999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            483.5920715332031,
+            72.08999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            483.5920715332031,
+            87.99200439453125
+          ],
+          [
+            105.26399999999998,
+            87.99200439453125
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "A. The Defendant Must Show that the Assertion of His Fifth \nAmendment Privilege Against Self-Incrimination Would \nAutomatically Result in the Entry of Summary Judgment Against \nHim.",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            141.372,
+            102.06
+          ],
+          [
+            543.322509765625,
+            102.06
+          ],
+          [
+            543.322509765625,
+            163.74200439453125
+          ],
+          [
+            141.372,
+            163.74200439453125
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "B. Additional Factors to Consider in Balancing the Prejudice to the \nParties",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            141.372,
+            72.08999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            543.5120849609375,
+            72.08999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            543.5120849609375,
+            102.99200439453125
+          ],
+          [
+            141.372,
+            102.99200439453125
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CONCLUSION",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 15,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            259.488,
+            251.91
+          ],
+          [
+            353.0791015625,
+            251.91
+          ],
+          [
+            353.0791015625,
+            268.36199951171875
+          ],
+          [
+            259.488,
+            268.36199951171875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 16,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            223.38,
+            72.08999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            388.9223937988281,
+            72.08999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            388.9223937988281,
+            86.9830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            223.38,
+            86.9830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            20
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            18
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            13
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            44
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            23
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            55
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            63
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            32
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            47
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            24
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            40
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            20
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            68
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 9,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            46
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            24
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 10,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 11,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            69
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            35
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 12,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            55
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 13,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 14,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            50
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            24
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 15,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            24
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 16,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            19
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739972"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739989/EFTA02739989.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739989/EFTA02739989.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0f7965e68a70eeb19a6e463a0a99c5367ba26763
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739989/EFTA02739989.md
@@ -0,0 +1,257 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 2,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+/
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119- MARRA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232- MARRA
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+/
+
+JANE DOE NO. 4,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+/
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380- MARRA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 5, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80381- MARIZA
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 6, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80994- MARRA
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 7, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80993- MARRA
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+C.M.A., CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80893-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. II, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80469- MA RRA/
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 101, CASE NO.: 09-CV-80591- MARRA
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+/
+
+JANE DOE NO. 102,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+CASE NO.: 09-CV-80656- MARR
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+PLAINTIFFS JANE DOE NO. 101 AND JANE DOE NO. 102's REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO PROCEED ANONYMOUSLY AND RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO COMPEL AND/OR IDENTIFY JANE DOE NO. 101 AND JANE DOE NO. 102 IN THIRD-PARTY SUBPOENAS FOR PURPOSES OF DISCOVERY'
+
+Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane Doe No. 102 (together, "Plaintiffs"), by and through their undersigned attorneys, hereby file their Reply in Support of Motion to Proceed Anonymously and Response in Opposition to Motion to Compel and/or Identify Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane Doe No. 102 in Third-Party Subpoenas for Purposes of Discovery, and, as grounds, state as follows:
+
+I. Exposure of Plaintiffs to the public disclosure of their identity and the resultant shame and humiliation accompanying their sexual exploitation is wholly unnecessary and premature, and may cause further damage. Plaintiffs respectfully assert that this Court should first decide the threshold issues of retroactivity and calculation of damages. Plaintiffs, and all other victims of Defendant who have filed an action against Defendant in federal court, will have to litigate these two following threshold issues being reviewed by the Court in the C.M.A. action against Defendant (Case No. 08-CV-80811-MARRA/ 1) whether the most recent version of the statute, which provides for a minimum recovery of \$150,000 (instead of the previous minimum of
+
+Plaintiffs respectfully file this Reply in the consolidated action, as the issue at hand pertains to discovery issues.
+
+\$50,000) applies to cases arising from incidents predating the 2006 amendment to the statute; and 2) whether the applicable minimum amount is recoverable per incident and/or per count, or per victim. Defendant has attempted to force settlements on any victims as possible without considering the possibility that the minimum amount recoverable under 18 U.S.C. § 2255 is \$150,000 per count and/or per incident. Much of this Court's caseload will be alleviated once the Court resolves these issues related to the minimum recovery; at that point, many of Defendant's victims will likely agree to settle for the minimum statutory damages to which they are entitled, thus obviating Defendant's specified need to destroy his victims' anonymity and expose them to further harm and humiliation.
+
+2. This Court has discretion to deny Defendant's Motion to Compel and/or Identify Plaintiffs in Third Party Subpoenas for Purposes of Discovery. See Doe v. Stegall, 653 F.2d 180, 184 (5th Cir. Aug. 10, 1981)2 ("Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(c) vests in the trial court discretion over litigants' requests for protection from 'annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden or expense' in the discovery process.") (internal quotation omitted). As more fully discussed in Plaintiffs' Response to Defendant's Motion to Stay, which is adopted and incorporated herein, Defendant waived his right to contest liability in actions filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255. Thus, third party discovery is relevant only if Plaintiffs seek recovery of damages in excess of the statutory minimum. Additionally, if and when the parties are ready to proceed with discovery from non-party sources, the Court can put numerous measures in place to maximize Plaintiffs' anonymity. At the outset, Defendant can obtain records from
+
+<sup>2</sup> In Bonner v. City of Prichard. 661 F.2d 1206, 1209 (11th Cir. 1981) (en banc). this circuit adopted as binding precedent all decisions of the former Fifth Circuit handed down before October I, 1981.
+
+various non-party sources through Plaintiffs' counsel, who can demonstrate and certify that they have obtained the very records being sought, or through an independent special who could be given releases by Plaintiffs to obtain such records on behalf of Defendant to eliminate any question of authenticity or completeness. If Defendant nevertheless insists on conducting his own third-party discovery (needlessly increasing the cost of litigating these actions and causing unnecessary delay), subpoenas seeking documents from sources such as health care providers or employers should not disclose the type of action or identify Defendant. Because of the highly-publicized nature of Defendant's crimes as well as his designation as a sexual offender, the mere mention of Defendant's name in any subpoena or deposition notice will automatically expose the subject Plaintiff as one of Defendant's victims and may result in unnecessary public humiliation. Similarly, records custodian depositions do not require the disclosure of the nature of the action and/or the identity of the defendant in the action.3
+
+3. Defendant's only purpose in opposing Plaintiffs' motions is harassment. Defendant's intentions are clear. He seeks to destroy these young women by outing them as being among his many victims, a pattern of behavior consistent with his status as a designated sex offender. Defendant openly admits to his desire to reveal the victims' names in newspapers so that individuals in their community can come forward to assault their credibility and tarnish their reputations (and, as a result, their dignity). See Defendant's Response in Opposition to Motion to Proceed Anonymously (DE# 5) at y 6 ("[O]nce the Plaintiff is identified, other individuals come forward in the discovery phase with information which often directly contradicts allegations as to the events and
+
+<sup>3</sup> Depending upon claims of Plaintiffs, certain documents will be relevant. At this point, however, Plaintiffs do not waive their privilege to prevent the release of each of their names under the doctor-patient relationship.
+
+damages. For instance, witnesses may testify that Plaintiff was paid by others for similar sexual acts she claims Mr. Epstein forced upon her or that she willingly participated in certain acts(s) that would negate or lessen her damages"). Each of Defendant's victims whom undersigned counsel represents continues to experience trauma and humiliation associated with sexual abuse. See Ellen Bass & Laura M, The Courage to Heal: A Guide for Women Survivors of Child Sexual Abuse 3 (4th ed. 2008) ("The long-term effects of child sexual abuse can be so pervasive that it's sometimes hard to pinpoint exactly how the abuse affected you. It can permeate everything: your sense of self, intimate relationships, sexuality, parenting, working, even your sanity.")4 The U.S. Supreme Court in Coker v. Georgia, 433 U.S. 584, 597 (1977), discussed the grave nature of the crimes at issue in the cases against Defendant, stating:
+
+[Rape] is highly reprehensible, both in a moral sense and in its almost total contempt for the personal integrity and autonomy of the female victim ... Short of homicide, it is the "ultimate violation of self."
+
+Defendant committed crimes constituting the "ultimate violation of self" against minors. Because of the disdainful nature of these types of crimes, courts, including the Eleventh Circuit, "have carved out a limited number of exceptions to the general requirement of disclosure, which permit plaintiffs to proceed anonymously." Roe v. Aware Woman Or. for Choice, Inc., 253 F.3d 678, 685 (11th Cir. 2001) (internal citation omitted). "The
+
+<sup>4</sup> Although some Plaintiffs no longer live in the Palm Beach area, this should not undermine Plaintiffs' need for anonymity. As the Court in Doe No. 2 v. Kolko, 242 F.R.D. 193, 197 (E.D.N.Y. 2006) (internal citation omitted), points out, "flit is now possible to 'determine whether a given individual is a party to a lawsuit in federal court anywhere in the country by the simplest of computer searches, to access the docket sheet of any such case electronically, and ... that entire case files will be accessible over the Internet." Given the ease with which the public could access court files in these cases, it is reasonable that Plaintiffs' fears extend beyond ostracism in the Palm Beach community. The Palm Beach Post is available online all over the world. In addition, many of Plaintiffs' family members remain in the Palm Beach area and remain unaware of their daughter/granddaughter/nicce's involvement in Defendant's sordid child sex exploitation enterprise. Furthermore. Plaintiffs are exposed to harassment through social networking sites such as Facebook and MySpacc as well as other forms of online harrassment.
+
+ultimate test for permitting a plaintiff to proceed anonymously is whether the plaintiff has a substantial privacy right which outweighs the customary and constitutionally-embedded presumption of openness in judicial proceedings." Id. (internal quotation and citation omitted).
+
+4. Cases regarding sexual assault are the paradigmatic examples of the type of highly sensitive and personal matter that warrant a grant of anonymity. See Doe No. 2 v. Kolb), 242 F.R.D. 193, 195-98 (E.D.N.Y. 2006) (adult plaintiff, who, many years later, alleged that he was sexually abused by rabbi at private Jewish school when he was a child, was entitled to proceed anonymously because he feared retaliation and ostracism from his community); Doe v. 202 F.R.D. 173, 176 (E.D. Pa. 2001) (sexual assault victim granted use of pseudonym); Doe v. M, 105 F. Supp. 2d 40, 44 (E.D.N.Y. 1999) (victim of assault, molestation, and sexual abuse granted anonymity because victim otherwise psychologically and emotionally unable to proceed with action); Roe v. Borup, 500 F. Supp. 127, 130 (E.D. Wis. 1980) ("It is beyond argument that [a suit involving charges of sexual abuse of a child] is a highly sensitive issue"; thus, plaintiffs were entitled to use fictitious names in prosecuting the suit); see also Doe v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield United of Wis., 112 F.3d 869, 872 (7th Cir. 1997) ("[F]ictitious names are allowed when necessary to protect the privacy of children, rape victims, and other particularly vulnerable parties or witnesses."). The intensely personal nature of sexual exploitation creates an unusual case, and, in such a case, the general policy of full disclosure should give way to a policy of protecting privacy in a very private matter. This protection is especially necessary when the Court is dealing with young women who recently were sexually abused as minors.
+
+5. Defendant is using the threat of publicity to attempt to intimidate victims to cause them not to file suit or to settle their claims for the absolute minimum in order for them to avoid being held up to public ridicule and hostility. His intention to attack the victims is at the heart of the protection afforded by numerous rape shield statutes, of which Defendant and his counsel are surely aware. In 1994, Congress amended the Federal Rules of Evidence to promote the strong social policy of protecting a victim's privacy and encouraging victims of crime to come forward. "The reason for extending Rule 412 to civil cases is equally obvious. The need to protect alleged victims against invasions of privacy, potential embarrassment, and unwarranted sexual stereotyping, and the wish to encourage victims to come forward when they have been sexually molested do not disappear because the context has shifted from a criminal prosecution to a claim for damages or injunctive relief." Fed. R. Evid. 412 advisory committee's note. Rule 412 now provides that, in civil trials in federal court involving alleged sexual misconduct, evidence that the victim engaged in other sexual behavior or evidence offered to prove any alleged victim's sexual predisposition can be admitted only in unusual circumstances, none of which apply to Plaintiffs' cases. Fed. R. Evid. 412 (a), (b). "The rule aims to safeguard the alleged victim against the invasion of privacy, potential embarrassment and sexual stereotyping that is associated with public disclosure of intimate sexual details and the infusion of sexual innuendo into the factfinding process. By affording victims protection in most instances, the rule also encourages victims of sexual misconduct to institute and to participate in legal proceedings against alleged offenders." Fed. R. Evid. 412 advisory committee's note; see also Michigan v. Lucas, 500 U.S. 145, 149-50 (1991) (Rape shield statutes represent the valid legislative determination that victims of rape and
+
+attempted rape "deserve heightened protection against surprise, harassment, and unnecessary invasions of privacy."); United States v. Elbert, 561 F.3d 771, 776-77 (8th Cir. 2009) (evidence that child plaintiffs had previously engaged in prostitution was rightfully excluded in federal sex trafficking suit); Stephens v. 13 F.3d 998, 1010 (7th Cir. 1994) (Cummings, C.J., dissenting) ("The Indiana rape shield statute furthers laudable and pragmatic goals. It protects victims from needless exposure of their sexual past conduct; [and] ensures that the focus of rape trials remains the guilt or innocence of the accused rather than the sexual history of the complainant."); United States v. Kasto, 584 F.2d 268, 271-72 n.3 (8th Cir. 1978) ("[U]nchastity of a victim has no relevance whatsoever to [the victim's] credibility as a witness. Such a proposition would `necessarily imply the absurd (corollary) that the extramarital sexual history of a female witness would be admissible to impeach her credibility in any case in which she testified.") (internal citation omitted). Procedural protections such as the rape shield statutes reduce the embarrassment and anguish of trial, encouraging victims to report sexual offenses and offendors. "Without the protection provided by rape shield statutes, victims may find trial an ordeal not worth enduring." Stephens, 13 F.3d at 1010 (Cummings, C.J., dissenting) (quoting 124 Cong. Rec. HI1944 (1978) (statement of Rep. Elizabeth Holtzman)); see Fed. R. Evid. 412 advisory committee's note ("Too often in this country victims of rape are humiliated and harassed when they report and prosecute the rape. ... [R]ape trials become inquisitions into the victim's morality, not trials of the defendant's innocence or guilt ...."). Indeed, "many [victims] find the trial almost as degrading as the rape itself." Fed. R. Evid. 412 advisory committee's note.
+
+6. In addition, Congress enacted the Child Victims' and Child Witnesses' Rights Act (18 U.S.C. § 3509) in an effort to provide protection for victims who, while minors, were victims of physical abuse, sexual abuse, or sexual exploitation, or who have witnessed a crime committed upon another. One of the primary protections provided by the statute is the restriction on the disclosure of the name of, or other information concerning, the victim. See 18 U.S.C. § 3509(d)(3) (2008). Further, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3509(d)(2), "[a]ll papers to be filed in court that disclose the name of or any other information concerning a child shall be filed under seal without necessity of obtaining a court order."
+
+7. Indeed, numerous states, including Florida and New York, have enacted laws to protect the anonymity of sexual assault victims. See Fla. Stat. §§ 794.024, 794.026 (2008); N.Y. Civ. Rights Law § 50-b (McKinney 2009). In 1994, the Florida Legislature passed The Crime Victims Protection Act. The legislative stated purpose for passage of the Act was "to protect the identity of victims of sexual crimes." Ha. AGO 2003-56, 2003 WL 22971082 (Dec. 15, 2003) ("[T]he Legislature intended to make the identity of a victim of a sexual crime confidential in a court record or proceeding.") Under Florida Section 794.024 of the Florida Statutes, court records that identify the name and/or address of a victim of a sexual crime are presumed to be confidential and exempt from public access. Id. That statute further imposes criminal and civil liability for the disclosure or communication of information identifying the victim of a sexual crime. Ha. AGO 2003-56, 2003 WL 22971082 (citing Fla. Stat. §§ 794.024, 794.026 (2008)). Similarly, upon approving New York's rape shield law, then Governor Mario stated, "[S]exual assault victims have unfortunately had to endure a terrible
+
+invasion of their physical privacy. They have a right to expect that this violation will not be compounded by a further invasion of their privacy." 1991 N.Y. Sess. Laws page nos. 2211-12, quoted in Kolko, 242 F.R.D. at 196 (internal citations omitted).
+
+8. Finally, Defendant should be estopped from outing his victims. Plaintiffs attempted to utilize the process established by the Non-Prosecution Agreement ("NPA") with the reasonable expectation that a specific purpose of the NPA was to allow Defendant's victims to maintain anonymity, only to be subjected to deliberate and unreasonable delays and Defendant's failure to engage in meaningful, good faith settlement discussions. This left Plaintiffs no choice but to file suit. Under these circumstances, Defendant should be estopped from seeking to lift anonymity.
+
+9. Many of Defendant's victims are awaiting this Court's decision regarding whether they will be allowed to proceed anonymously before making the difficult decision as to whether to pursue their claims against Defendant. All of Defendant's victims and any future victims of sexual exploitation must know that they can protect what remains of their personal dignity when appealing to the Federal Courts for justice.
+
+WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully move this Court to grant Plaintiffs' Motion to Proceed Anonymously and to deny Defendant's Motion to Compel and/or Identify Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane Doe No. 102 in Third-Party Subpoenas for Purposes of Discovery.
+
+Date: May 29, 2009
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+PODHURST ORSECK, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane Doe No. 102
+
+By: s/Katherine W. Ezell Robert C. Josefsberg Fla. Bar No. 040856 riosefsberit@podhurst.com Katherine W. Ezell Fla. Bar No. 114771 kezell@nodhurst.com City National Bank Building 25 W. Flagler Street, Suite 800 Miami, FL 33130 Telephone: (305) 358-2800 Facsimile: (305) 358-2382
+
+## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
+
+WE HEREBY CERTIFY that, on this 29th day of May, 2009, we electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. We also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record identified on the attached Service List either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those counsel or parties who are not authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing.
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+PODHURST ORSECK, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane Doe No. 102
+
+By: s/Katherine W. Ezell Robert C. Josefsberg Fla. Bar No. 040856 rjosefsberg@podhurst.com Katherine W. Ezell Fla. Bar No. 114771 kezell@podhurst.com City National Bank Building 25 W. Flagler Street, Suite 800 Miami, FL 33130 Telephone: (305) 358-2800 Facsimile: (305) 358-2382
+
+**SERVICE LIST**
+
+JANE DOE NO. 2 v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN  
+Case No. 08-CV-80119-MARRA/[REDACTED]  
+United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
+
+Robert Critton, Esq.  
+Michael J. Pike, Esq.  
+Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman LLP  
+515 North Flagler Drive, Suite 400  
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401  
+Phone: (561) 842-2820  
+Fax: (561) 515-3148  
+[rcrit@bclclaw.com](mailto:rcrit@bclclaw.com)  
+[mpike@bclclaw.com](mailto:mpike@bclclaw.com)  
+*Counsel for Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein*
+
+Jack Goldberger, Esq.  
+Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.  
+250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400  
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401  
+Phone: (561) 659-8300  
+Fax: (561) 835-8691  
+[jagesq@bellsouth.net](mailto:jagesq@bellsouth.net)  
+*Co-Counsel for Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein*
+
+Bruce E. Reinhart, Esq.  
+Bruce E. Reinhart, P.A.  
+250 South Australian Avenue, Suite 1400  
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401  
+Phone: (561) 202-6360  
+Fax: (561) 828-0983  
+[ecf@brucereinhartlaw.com](mailto:ecf@brucereinhartlaw.com)  
+*Counsel for Co-Defendant,* [REDACTED]
+
+Jack Scarola, Esq.  
+Jack P. [REDACTED], Esq.  
+Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.  
+2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard  
+West Palm Beach, Florida 33409  
+Phone: (561) 686-6300  
+Fax: (561) 383-9456  
+[jsx@searcylaw.com](mailto:jsx@searcylaw.com)  
+[jph@searcylaw.com](mailto:jph@searcylaw.com)  
+*Counsel for Plaintiff C.M.A.*
+
+Adam Horowitz, Esq. Stuart Mermelstein, Esq. Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A. 18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218 Miami, FL 33160 Phone: (305) 931-2200 Fax: (305) 931-0877 ahorowitz@sexabuseattomey.com smermelstein@sexabuseattoney.com Counsel for Plaintiffs in Related Case Nos. 08-80069, 08-80119,08-80232, 08-80380, 08- 80381, 08-80993, 08-80994
+
+Spencer Todd Kuvin, Esq. Theodore Jon Leopold, Esq. Leopold Kuvin, P.A. 2925 PGA Boulevard, Suite 200 Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 Phone: (561) 515-1400 Fax: (561) 515-1401 skuvin@leopoldkuvin.com tleopold@leopoldkuvin.com Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-08804
+
+Richard Willits, Esq. Richard H. Willits, P.A. 2290 10th Ave North, Suite 404 Lake Worth, FL 33461 Phone: (561) 582-7600 Fax: (561) 588-8819 lawyerwillits@aol.com reelrhw@hotmail.com Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-80811
+
+Brad Esq. Law Office of Brad & Associates, LLC 2028 Street, Suite 202 Hollywood, FL 33020 Phone: (954) 414-8033 Fax: (954) 924-1530 bedwardserra-law.com be@bradedwardslaw.com Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-80893
+
+Isidro Manuel Esq. Elkins & Boehringer 224 Datum Avenue, Suite 900
+
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+
+Phone: (561) 832-8033
+
+Fax: (561) 832-7137
+
+isidrogarcia@bellsouth.net
+
+Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-80469
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739989/EFTA02739989.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739989/EFTA02739989.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e901b27d221d6e8405a081581dbbe49232911852
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739989/EFTA02739989.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,692 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739989.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 17,
+  "chars": 22552,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 6.83,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            205.02,
+            72.08999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            405.95098876953125,
+            72.08999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            405.95098876953125,
+            100.10302734375
+          ],
+          [
+            205.02,
+            100.10302734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 13,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            223.38,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            388.5423889160156,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            388.5423889160156,
+            86.2330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            223.38,
+            86.2330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "SERVICE LIST",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 14,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            260.712,
+            72.08999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            348.84,
+            72.08999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            348.84,
+            85.05
+          ],
+          [
+            260.712,
+            85.05
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            57
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            29
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            23
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            49
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            23
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            22
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            49
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            24
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            22
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            50
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            55
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            55
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            67
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            32
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            49
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 9,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            49
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            24
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 10,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            49
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 11,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 12,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            14
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 13,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            49
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 14,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 15,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            87
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            43
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 16,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            15
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02739989"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740006/EFTA02740006.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740006/EFTA02740006.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0ed1f3542a867eb34048eac6aa1c81dbf6492300
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740006/EFTA02740006.md
@@ -0,0 +1,241 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 2,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119- MARItA
+
+/
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232- MARR I
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+/
+
+JANE DOE NO. 4, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380- MARRA
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+/
+
+JANE DOE NO. 5, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80381- MARRA
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+/
+
+JANE DOE NO. 6, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80994- MARRA/
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 7, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80993- MARRA
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+J
+
+C.M.A., CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80893-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+/
+
+JANE DOE NO. II, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80469- MARR I
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+/
+
+JANE DOE NO. 101, CASE NO.: 09-CV-80591- MARRA
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+/
+
+JANE DOE NO. 102, CASE NO.: 09-CV-80656- MARRA
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## PLAINTIFFS JANE DOE NO. 101 AND JANE DOE NO 102's MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STAY OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO UNSEAL THE NONPROSECUTION AGREEMENT
+
+Pursuant to Rule 5.4 of the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane Doe No. 102 (together, the "Plaintiffs") by and through their undersigned attorneys, hereby file this Motion For Leave to File Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane Doe No. 102's Response in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Stay and/or Continue Action for Time Certain Based on Parallel Civil and Criminal Proceedings With Incorporated Memorandum of Law Under Seal, and, as grounds, state as follows:
+
+I. Undersigned counsel seek to file this Response in Opposition to Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Stay under seal in order to abide by this Court's August 21, 2008 Order to Compel Production and Protective Order entered in Case No. 08-80736- CIV-MARRa (the "Protective Order"). The Protective Order prohibits Plaintiffs from disclosing the Non-Prosecution Agreement (the "NPA") or its terms to any third party. The sealed document should be maintained under seal for the duration of this Court's August 21.2008 Protective Order.
+
+2. Undersigned counsel recognize that this Court has previously unsealed documents referring to the NPA. We seek to comply with the Protective Order for this new and independent filing in an abundance of caution, until directed otherwise by the Court.
+
+3. If this Court denies Plaintiffs' instant motion, Plaintiffs seek appropriate disclosure of the NPA pursuant to this Court's recent order in Case No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRa (DE #36) denying Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2's motion to unseal the NPA. As stated in that Order, the NPA has not been filed with the Court. Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane Doe No. 102 would then have "a specific tangible need to be relieved of the restrictions" of the Protective Order because consideration of the terms of the NPA is necessary for this Court to resolve Defendant's Motion to Stay.
+
+WHEREFORE,
+
+I. Plaintiffs respectfully request this Court to enter an Order granting Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane Doe No. 102 the right to file under seal their Response in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Stay and/or Continue Action for Time Certain Based on Parallel Civil and Criminal Proceedings With Incorporated Memorandum of Law.
+
+2. In the alternative, Plaintiffs respectfully request this Court to unseal the Non-Prosecution Agreement in order to allow Plaintiffs to concretely respond to Defendant's Motion to Stay.
+
+3. Finally, Plaintiffs respectfully request this Court to grant such other and further relief to which this Court finds the Plaintiff otherwise entitled.
+
+Date: May 29, 2009
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+PODHURST ORSECK, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane Doe No. 102
+
+By: s/Katherine W. Ezell Robert C. Josefsberg Fla. Bar No. 040856 rjosefsberg@podhurst.com Katherine W. Ezell Fla. Bar No. 114771 kezell@podhurst.com City National Bank Building 25 W. Flagler Street, Suite 800 Miami, FL 33130 Telephone: (305) 358-2800 Facsimile: (305) 358-2382
+
+# CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL RULE 7.1.A.3
+
+On May 29, 2009, undersigned counsel conferred with counsel for Defendant in a good faith effort to resolve the issues raised in this motion, and Defendant's counsel advised that Defendant opposes this motion.
+
+Date: May 29, 2009
+
+## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
+
+WE HEREBY CERTIFY that, on this 29th day of May, 2009, we electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. We also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record identified on the attached Service List either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those counsel or parties who are not authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing.
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+PODHURST ORSECK, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane Doe No. 102
+
+By: s/Katherine W. Ezell Robert C. Josefsberg Fla. Bar No. 040856 rjosefsberg@podhurst.com Katherine W. Ezell Fla. Bar No. 114771 kezell@podhurst.com City National Bank Building 25 W. Flagler Street, Suite 800 Miami, FL 33130 Telephone: (305) 358-2800 Facsimile: (305) 358-2382
+
+**SERVICE LIST**
+
+JANE DOE NO. 2 v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN  
+Case No. 08-CV-80119-MARRA/[REDACTED]  
+United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
+
+Robert Critton, Esq.  
+Michael J. Pike, Esq.  
+Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman LLP  
+515 North Flagler Drive, Suite 400  
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401  
+Phone: (561) 842-2820  
+Fax: (561) 515-3148  
+[rcrit@bclclaw.com](mailto:rcrit@bclclaw.com)  
+[mpike@bclclaw.com](mailto:mpike@bclclaw.com)  
+*Counsel for Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein*
+
+Jack Goldberger, Esq.  
+Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.  
+250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400  
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401  
+Phone: (561) 659-8300  
+Fax: (561) 835-8691  
+[jagesq@bellsouth.net](mailto:jagesq@bellsouth.net)  
+*Co-Counsel for Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein*
+
+Bruce E. Reinhart, Esq.  
+Bruce E. Reinhart, P.A.  
+250 South Australian Avenue, Suite 1400  
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401  
+Phone: (561) 202-6360  
+Fax: (561) 828-0983  
+[ecf@brucereinhartlaw.com](mailto:ecf@brucereinhartlaw.com)  
+*Counsel for Co-Defendant,* [REDACTED]
+
+Jack Scarola, Esq.  
+Jack P. [REDACTED], Esq.  
+Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.  
+2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard  
+West Palm Beach, Florida 33409  
+Phone: (561) 686-6300  
+Fax: (561) 383-9456  
+[jsx@searcylaw.com](mailto:jsx@searcylaw.com)  
+[jph@searcylaw.com](mailto:jph@searcylaw.com)  
+*Counsel for Plaintiff C.M.A.*
+
+Adam Horowitz, Esq. Stuart Mermelstein, Esq. Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A. 18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218 Miami, FL 33160 Phone: (305) 931-2200 Fax: (305) 931-0877
+
+ahorowitz@sexabuseattomey.com smermelstein@sexabuseattoney.com Counsel for Plaintiffs in Related Case Nos. 08-80069, 08-80119,08-80232, 08-80380, 08- 80381, 08-80993, 08-80994
+
+Spencer Todd Kuvin, Esq. Theodore Jon Leopold, Esq. Leopold Kuvin, P.A. 2925 PGA Boulevard, Suite 200 Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 Phone: (561) 515-1400 Fax: (561) 515-1401 skuvin@leopoldkuvin.com tleopold@leopoldkuvin.com Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-08804
+
+Richard Willits, Esq. Richard H. Willits, P.A. 2290 10th Ave North, Suite 404 Lake Worth, FL 33461 Phone: (561) 582-7600 Fax: (561) 588-8819 lawyerwillits@aol.com reelrhw@hotmail.com Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-80811
+
+Brad Esq. Law Office of Brad & Associates, LLC 2028 Street, Suite 202 Hollywood, FL 33020 Phone: (954) 414-8033 Fax: (954) 924-1530 bedwards@rra-law.com be@bradedwardslaw.com Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-80893
+
+Isidro Manuel Esq. Elkins & Boehringer
+
+224 Datum Avenue. Suite 900
+
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+
+Phone: (561) 832-8033
+
+Fax: (561) 832-7137
+
+isidrogarcia@bellsouth.net
+
+Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-80469
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740006/EFTA02740006.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740006/EFTA02740006.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..887a84b8675633c9aca8d6b57b92a334622116de
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740006/EFTA02740006.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,492 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740006.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 10,
+  "chars": 8224,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 6.53,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            205.63200000000003,
+            98.82
+          ],
+          [
+            406.3418273925781,
+            98.82
+          ],
+          [
+            406.3418273925781,
+            127.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            205.63200000000003,
+            127.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "PLAINTIFFS JANE DOE NO. 101 AND JANE DOE NO 102's MOTION FOR \nLEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO \nDEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STAY OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO UNSEAL \nTHE NONPROSECUTION AGREEMENT",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            88.12799999999999,
+            250.28999999999996
+          ],
+          [
+            523.7517700195312,
+            250.28999999999996
+          ],
+          [
+            523.7517700195312,
+            306.7330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            88.12799999999999,
+            306.7330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL RULE 7.1.A.3",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            123.01200000000001,
+            360.45000000000005
+          ],
+          [
+            477.2323303222656,
+            360.45000000000005
+          ],
+          [
+            477.2323303222656,
+            376.10302734375
+          ],
+          [
+            123.01200000000001,
+            376.10302734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            223.38,
+            72.08999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            388.5423889160156,
+            72.08999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            388.5423889160156,
+            86.2330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            223.38,
+            86.2330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "SERVICE LIST",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            260.712,
+            72.08999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            348.84,
+            72.08999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            348.84,
+            85.05
+          ],
+          [
+            260.712,
+            85.05
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            57
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            22
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            24
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            55
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            9
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            52
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            91
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            45
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 9,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            19
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02740006"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740016/EFTA02740016.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740016/EFTA02740016.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3c0ab375922c75a4c8f367e845bb525438f67bad
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740016/EFTA02740016.md
@@ -0,0 +1,251 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA I
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 4, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 5, CASE NO.: 08-CV-8038I -MARRA/JOHNSON
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 6, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80994-MARRA=.
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 7, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80993-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+C.M.A., CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80893-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. II, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80469-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 101, CASE NO.: 09-CV-80591-MARRA/JOHNSON
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 102, CASE NO.: 09-CV-80656-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+MOTION TO RESCHEDULE HEARING
+
+COMES NOW Robert C. Josefsberg, as co-counsel for Jane Doe 101 and 102, and respectfully requests either a rescheduling of this Court's hearing (just rescheduled for June, 12, 2009) or in the alternative, permission to appear by telephone at said hearing, on the following grounds:
+
+I) On Wednesday, June 10, 2009, undersigned counsel, his wife and two granddaughters will be traveling to Hanover, New Hampshire for counsel's 50th College Reunion, and an opportunity for his two high school granddaughters to visit colleges in the Northeast. Counsel is scheduled to return to South Florida on Tuesday, June le.
+
+2) Counsel is very appreciative and supportive of the Court's scheduling a hearing on the Defendants' Motion to Stay. That hearing was scheduled ( within the last 3 hours) for Friday, June 12th at 10:00 a.m. , right in the middle of Robert Josefsberg's reunion visit.
+
+3) If Robert Josefsberg cannot attend, Jane Doe 101 and 102 will be well represented by co-counsel who can and will appear in person at said hearing on June 12, 2009. However, Robert Josefsberg is lead counsel and would prefer to be present during said hearing.
+
+4) In the event that this hearing cannot be rescheduled for June 4, 5, 8 or 9h, or June lr , 18th or 19th, Robert Josefsberg requests permission to appear at said June 12th hearing by telephone.
+
+WHEREFORE, Robert Josefsberg requests the relief requested above.
+
+Dated May 29, 2009.
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+PODHURST ORSECK, P.A.
+
+Attorneys for Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane Doe No. 102
+
+By: s/ Robert C. Josefsberg Robert C. Josefsberg Ha. Br No. 040856 rjosefsberg@podhurst.com
+
+> Katherine W. Ezell Fla. Bar No. 114771 kezell@podhurst.com City National Bank Building 25 W. Hagler Street, Suite 800 Miami, FL 33130 Telephone: (305) 358-2800 Facsimile: (305) 358-2382
+
+## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
+
+WE HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day of May, 2009, we electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. We also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record identified on the attached Service List either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those counsel or parties who are not authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing.
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+PODHURST ORSECK, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane Doe No. 102
+
+By: s/Katherine W. Ezell Robert C. Josefsberg Fla. Br No. 040856 rjosefsberg@podhurst.com Katherine W. Ezell Fla. Bar No. 114771 kezell@podhurst.com City National Bank Building 25 W. Flagler Street, Suite 800 Miami, FL 33130 Telephone: (305) 358-2800 Facsimile: (305) 358-2382
+
+## SERVICE LIST
+
+JANE DOE NO. 2 v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN Case No. 08-CV-80119-MARRa United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
+
+Robert Critton, Esq. Michael J. Pike, Esq. Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman LLP 515 North Flagler Drive, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561) 842-2820 Fax: (561) 515-3148 rcrit@bdclaw.com mpike@bciclaw.com Counsel for Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein
+
+Jack Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561) 659-8300 Fax: (561) 835-8691 jagesq@bellsouth.net Co-Counsel for Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein
+
+Bruce E. Reinhart, Esq. Bruce E. Reinhart, P.A. 250 South Australian Avenue, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561) 202-6360 Fax: (561) 828-0983 ecf@brucereinhartlaw.corn Counsel for Co-Defendant,
+
+Jack Scarola, Esq. Jack P. M, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 Fax: (561) 383-9456 jsx@searcylaw.com jph@searcvlaw.com Counsel for Plaintiff C.M.A.
+
+Adam Horowitz, Esq.
+
+Stuart Mermelstein, Esq.
+
+Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A.
+
+18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218
+
+Miami, FL 33160
+
+Phone: (305) 931-2200
+
+Fax: (305) 931-0877
+
+ahorowitz@sexabuseattomey.com
+
+smermelstein@sexabuseattornev.com
+
+Counsel for Plaintiffs in Related Cases Nos. 08-80069, 08-80119,08-80232, 08-80380, 08- 80381, 08-80993, 08-80994
+
+Spencer Todd Kuvin, Esq.
+
+Theodore Jon Leopold, Esq.
+
+Leopold Kuvin, P.A.
+
+2925 PGA Boulevard, Suite 200
+
+Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410
+
+Phone: (561) 515-1400
+
+Fax: (561) 515-1401
+
+skuvin@leopoldkuvin.com
+
+tleopold@leopoldkuvin.com
+
+Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-08804
+
+Richard Willits, Esq.
+
+Richard H. Willits, P.A.
+
+2290 10th Ave North, Suite 404
+
+Lake Worth, FL 33461
+
+Phone: (561) 582-7600
+
+Fax: (561) 588-8819
+
+Jawyerwillits@aol.corn
+
+reelrhw@hotmail.com
+
+Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-80811
+
+Brad , Esq.
+
+Law Office of Brad & Associates, LLC
+
+2028 Street, Suite 202
+
+Hollywood, FL 33020
+
+Phone: (954) 414-8033
+
+Fax: (954) 924-1530
+
+bedwards@rra-law.com
+
+be@bradedwardslaw.com
+
+Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-80893
+
+Isidro Manuel Esq.
+
+Elkins & Boehringer
+
+224 Datum Avenue, Suite 900
+
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+
+Phone: (561) 832-8033
+
+Fax: (561) 832-7137
+
+isidrogarcia@bellsouth.net
+
+Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-80469
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740016/EFTA02740016.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740016/EFTA02740016.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..15dfc1347ec9b6c92cb8cf07bf1f04613116f03b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740016/EFTA02740016.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,412 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740016.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 9,
+  "chars": 6273,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 2.14,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            405.95098876953125,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            405.95098876953125,
+            100.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            100.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            223.38,
+            72.08999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            388.520263671875,
+            72.08999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            388.520263671875,
+            86.9830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            223.38,
+            86.9830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "SERVICE LIST",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            261.324,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            351.0882873535156,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            351.0882873535156,
+            86.9830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            261.324,
+            86.9830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            45
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            22
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            22
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            41
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            23
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            21
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            42
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            22
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            21
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            46
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            20
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            37
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            19
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            49
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            83
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            42
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            89
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            44
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            41
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            13
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02740016"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740025/EFTA02740025.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740025/EFTA02740025.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0b75d4f23661d695c731d806e0ae6a9876fa2c86
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740025/EFTA02740025.md
@@ -0,0 +1,260 @@
+## -UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-
+
+JANE DOE NO. 4, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-
+
+Plaintiff;
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 5, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80381-
+
+MARRA/JOHNSON
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 6, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80994 mmuziv
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 7, CASE NO.: OS-CV-80993- MAR
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+C.M.A., CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-MARIZA
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80893-
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. II, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80469-
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 101, CASE NO.: 09-CV-80591- MARRA
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 102, CASE NO.: 09-CV-80656- MA
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## PLAINTIFFS JANE DOE NO. 101 AND JANE DOE NO. 102's REPLY TO DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS JANE DOE NO. 101 AND JANE DOE NO. 102'S MOTION FOR A NO-CONTACT ORDER
+
+Plaintiffs, JANE DOE No. 101 and JANE DOE No. 102 (together, the "Plaintiffs"), by and through undersigned counsel, hereby reply to Defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Response to Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane Doe No. 102's Motion for a No-Contact Order (" Response") as follows:
+
+1. Plaintiffs have not, and will not, engage in any name-calling. For purposes of Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane Doe No. 102's Motion for a No-Contact Order ("Motion"), it does not matter whether "many of the alleged victims . were or are admitted prostitutes, dancers at strip clubs . . . or have criminal records or warrants for their arrests . . . ," Def.'s Resp. 4, or whether they were living in a monastery or planning on becoming nuns, lawyers, or judges. This matter is quite simple: The allegations are that, when these victims were minors, Defendant sexually exploited, abused, molested, and/or battered them. Regardless of the victims' character or Defendant's character, it is obvious that Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, a 55-year-old designated sexual offender and convicted felon, should have no contact with his victims.
+
+2. Defendant makes much ado that one victim allegedly telephoned Jack Goldberger's office to complain that Mr. Goldberger was holding up the matter. Def.'s Resp. 5. We have no reason to doubt the truth of that statement by defense counsel. Unsurprisingly, a 21-year-old homeless, ill, and desperate victim who had waited for settlement funds for seven weeks regretfully may have called Mr. Goldberger's office; but whether she did so has nothing to do with Plaintiffs' Motion. Likewise, if Defendant attempts to telephone undersigned counsel to complain or have any other contact with undersigned counsel, undersigned counsel will handle the matter as professionally as Jack Goldberger did—by refusing to speak to the opposing party.
+
+3. The troublesome part of Defendant's position is his counsel's statement in the attached correspondence that, pursuant to Rule 4-4.2 of the Rules of Professional Conduct, "parties to a matter may communicate directly with each other In this case, Plaintiffs' counsel are concerned that Defendant or his agents may assert that alleged right, and we vehemently disagree that they should have that prerogative in these Plaintiffs' cases. No legal justification exists for Defendant or his agents to have any direct communications with victims whom Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, sexually exploited, abused, molested, and/or battered.
+
+In his Response, see Def.'s Resp. 4, and in his letter, counsel for Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, professes that "it is not Mr. Epstein's intention to have any direct contact with [our] clients." This statement poses two significant problems. First, it leaves the door open for Defendant's investigatorts) or other agent(s) to contact the victims. Such contact would not be direct and would not be inconsistent with his professed intention to refrain from direct contact with his victims. See, e.g., v. All State Home Mortgage, Inc., No. 08-3564, 2009 WL 1391527, at \*1 (6th Cir. May 15, 2009) (intimidation of plaintiffs-loan officers with contentious relationship with defendant-mortgage company
+
+through threatening phone calls by defendant's employees considered indirect contact in violation of no-contact order in civil suit claiming violation of Fair Labor Standards Act); Commonwealth v. = 661 N.E. 2d 666, 666-67 (Mass. App. Ct. 1996) (defendant's anonymous delivery of flowers to victim considered indirect contact in violation of nocontact order). Second, Defendant's counsel does not state that Defendant will not have any contact with his victims. He merely states Defendant's intentions. Unfortunately, the last five months is replete with other incidents in which Defendant, through his counsel, has stated his intentions and thereafter changed his mind. Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, feels free—and actually is free—to change his mind and his stated intentions. His victims deserve more than that. Because they are traumatized and fearful, they require for their security a firm, unambiguous commitment that Defendant will not directly or indirectly contact either of them; considering the situation, any secure commitment is attainable only via a Court order. Plaintiffs cannot emotionally afford to be in a position in which Defendant can unilaterally change his mind.
+
+4. In the event that Defendant wants to be present at the deposition of a Plaintiff or at a Court hearing where a Plaintiff is to attend, the Court can easily resolve such situations at that time. Meanwhile, the sole purpose of Defendant's refusal to agree to not contact these Plaintiffs is to leave them intimidated and in fear of being in the presence of the man who has sexually exploited, abused, molested, and/or battered them. One would think that, instead, Defendant would have voluntarily agreed with Plaintiff? prior request to have no contact directly or indirectly, including through his agents, and would want to demonstrate to the Court that he will not contact his victims; his refusal to stay away from them is nothing short of disturbing.
+
+5. Although not requested, if Defendant's counsel seeks some type of reciprocity, Plaintiffs' counsel would agree in writing, and would not oppose a Court order prohibiting Plaintiffs from contacting Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein. It is obvious to undersigned counsel that there should be absolutely no contact between the parties to these lawsuits.
+
+WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs request this Court to enter an Order prohibiting Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and/or his agents from directly or indirectly contacting them.
+
+Dated: June 4, 2009.
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+PODHURST ORSECK, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane Doe No. 102
+
+By: s/ Robert C. Josefsberst Robert C. Josefsberg Fla. Bar No. 040856 riosefsbera©podhurst.com Katherine W. Ezell Fla. Bar No. 114771 kezell©podhurst.com City National Bank Building 25 W. Flagler Street, Ste. 800 Miami, FL 33130 Telephone: (305) 358-2800 Facsimile: (305) 358-2382
+
+## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
+
+WE HEREBY CERTIFY that, on this 4th day of June, 2009, we electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CMJECF. We also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record identified on the attached Service List either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those counsel or parties who are not authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing.
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+PODHURST ORSECIC, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane Doe No. 102
+
+By: s/Katherine W. Ezell Robert C. Josefsberg Fla. Bar No. 040856 riosefsbera@oodhurst.com Katherine W. Ezell Fla. Bar No. 114771 kezell@podhurst.com City National Bank Building 25 W. Flagler Street, Ste. 800 Miami, FL 33130 Telephone: (305) 358-2800 Facsimile: (305) 358-2382
+
+**SERVICE LIST**
+
+JANE DOE NO. 2 v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN  
+Case No. 08-CV-80119-MARRA/ [REDACTED]  
+United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
+
+Robert Critton, Esq.  
+Michael J. Pike, Esq.  
+Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman LLP  
+515 North Flagler Drive, Suite 400  
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401  
+Phone: (561) 842-2820  
+Fax: (561) 515-3148  
+[rcrit@bclclaw.com](mailto:rcrit@bclclaw.com)  
+[mpike@bclclaw.com](mailto:mpike@bclclaw.com)  
+*Counsel for Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein*
+
+Jack Goldberger, Esq.  
+Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.  
+250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400  
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401  
+Phone: (561) 659-8300  
+Fax: (561) 835-8691  
+[jagesq@bellsouth.net](mailto:jagesq@bellsouth.net)  
+*Co-Counsel for Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein*
+
+Bruce E. Reinhart, Esq.  
+Bruce E. Reinhart, P.A.  
+250 South Australian Avenue, Suite 1400  
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401  
+Phone: (561) 202-6360  
+Fax: (561) 828-0983  
+[ecf@brucereinhartlaw.com](mailto:ecf@brucereinhartlaw.com)  
+*Counsel for Co-Defendant, [REDACTED]*
+
+Jack Scarola, Esq.  
+Jack P. [REDACTED], Esq.  
+Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.  
+2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard  
+West Palm Beach, Florida 33409  
+Phone: (561) 686-6300  
+Fax: (561) 383-9456  
+[jsx@searcylaw.com](mailto:jsx@searcylaw.com)  
+[jph@searcylaw.com](mailto:jph@searcylaw.com)  
+*Counsel for Plaintiff C.M.A.*
+
+Adam Horowitz, Esq.  
+Stuart Mermelstein, Esq.  
+Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A.  
+18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218  
+Miami, FL 33160  
+Phone: (305) 931-2200  
+Fax: (305) 931-0877  
+[ahorowitz@sexabuseattorney.com](mailto:ahorowitz@sexabuseattorney.com)  
+[smermelstein@sexabuseattorney.com](mailto:smermelstein@sexabuseattorney.com)
+
+*Counsel for Plaintiffs in Related Case Nos. 08-80069, 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80993, 08-80994*
+
+Spencer Todd Kuvin, Esq.  
+Theodore Jon Leopold, Esq.  
+Leopold Kuvin, P.A.  
+2925 PGA Boulevard, Suite 200  
+Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410  
+Phone: (561) 515-1400  
+Fax: (561) 515-1401  
+[skuvin@leopoldkuvin.com](mailto:skuvin@leopoldkuvin.com)  
+[tleopold@leopoldkuvin.com](mailto:tleopold@leopoldkuvin.com)
+
+*Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-08804*
+
+Richard Willits, Esq.  
+Richard H. Willits, P.A.  
+2290 10<sup>th</sup> Ave North, Suite 404  
+Lake Worth, FL 33461  
+Phone: (561) 582-7600  
+Fax: (561) 588-8819  
+[lawyerwillits@aol.com](mailto:lawyerwillits@aol.com)  
+[reelrhw@hotmail.com](mailto:reelrhw@hotmail.com)
+
+*Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-80811*
+
+Brad [REDACTED], Esq.  
+Law Office of Brad [REDACTED] & Associates, LLC  
+2028 [REDACTED] Street, Suite 202  
+Hollywood, FL 33020  
+Phone: (954) 414-8033  
+Fax: (954) 924-1530  
+[bedwards@rra-law.com](mailto:bedwards@rra-law.com)  
+[be@bradedwardslaw.com](mailto:be@bradedwardslaw.com)
+
+*Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-80893*
+
+Isidro Manuel [REDACTED], Esq.  
+[REDACTED] Elkins & Boehringer
+
+224 Datum Avenue, Suite 900
+
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+
+Phone: (561) 832-8033
+
+Fax: (561) 832-7137
+
+isidrogarciaAbellsouth.net
+
+Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-80469
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740025/EFTA02740025.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740025/EFTA02740025.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b7f93ddba2ef25a0bfa8a43666f3d5aa08d4b071
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740025/EFTA02740025.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,491 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740025.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 11,
+  "chars": 11304,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 7.79,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "-UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            206.91799999999998,
+            72.08999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            409.08184814453125,
+            72.08999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            409.08184814453125,
+            101.36248779296875
+          ],
+          [
+            206.91799999999998,
+            101.36248779296875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "PLAINTIFFS JANE DOE NO. 101 AND JANE DOE NO. 102's \nREPLY TO DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS \nJANE DOE NO. 101 AND JANE DOE NO. 102'S MOTION FOR A NO-\nCONTACT ORDER",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            93.32799999999999,
+            198.45000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            520.7969360351562,
+            198.45000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            520.7969360351562,
+            255.86248779296875
+          ],
+          [
+            93.32799999999999,
+            255.86248779296875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            243.758,
+            75.33
+          ],
+          [
+            408.38812255859375,
+            75.33
+          ],
+          [
+            408.38812255859375,
+            89.73248291015625
+          ],
+          [
+            243.758,
+            89.73248291015625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "SERVICE LIST",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            262.178,
+            76.14
+          ],
+          [
+            350.59399999999994,
+            76.14
+          ],
+          [
+            350.59399999999994,
+            89.1
+          ],
+          [
+            262.178,
+            89.1
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            43
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            24
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            22
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            45
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            23
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            22
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            41
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            21
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            21
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            47
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            49
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            49
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 9,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            49
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 10,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            15
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02740025"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740036/EFTA02740036.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740036/EFTA02740036.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5b9d785c9a2637f3b92aee8ba866efcd0b90e696
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740036/EFTA02740036.md
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
+## The Psychological Trauma Center a division of Preventive Psychiatry Associates Medical Group, Inc.
+
+Medical Director: Gilbert W. Kliman. M. D.
+
+2105 1)evt.sakto St . San Francisco. CA 94115 Mow 1415)292.7119 Fax (4151749-2802 9 tot expertchthawifluatn.rom
+
+Foretutc Child Psychiatric Evaluations. Life Care Plans R Testimony
+
+## DECLARATION OF GILBERT KLIMAN, M. D.
+
+June 4, 2009
+
+## RE: EXPECTATION OF HARM FROM DISCLOSING THE PLAINTIFFS' IDENTITIES IN DOES V JEFFREY EPSTEIN
+
+- 1. I, Gilbert W. Kliman, M.D., of 2105 Divisadero Street, San Francisco, California, CA. Physicians License G55912, declare the following under penalty of penury:
+- 2. I have been retained by plaintiffs' law firm, Memielstein & Horowitz, to give expert testimony. If called as a witness, I would testify truthfully and competently concerning my psychiatric findings about each of the plaintiffs' alleged experiences of sexual abuse, and the enduring effects that I find each of the young women have suffered as a direct result of the sexual acts perpetrated by the defendant. 3.1 have been asked to respond to the Defense motion, which requests that some of the plaintiffs, who are now adults, should be publicly named. It is my opinion that involuntary public disclosure will result in the plaintiffs experiencing revictimization, albeit by a justice system that is designed to protect them. If their identities are released, the victims will be at-risk of having their personal lives scrutinized by friends, extended family, spouses, children, fellow students, employers and fellow employees, the media and general public. This type of exposure humiliates many victims and represents another betrayal of trust. Public exposure places the plaintiffs at further risk of stigmatization, shame and retraumatization.
+- 4. Due to traumatization the plaintiffs are arrested in their development, and even those who are now legally adults are arrested in part to adolescent aspects of psychology.
+- 5. The plaintiffs do not hold their heads high with pride for having been sexually controlled by Mr. Epstein. They hold their heads low with shame. The internal life of a typical adolescent, into late adolescence and early adult years in the best of circumstances, usually involves generous proportions of self-consciousness, shame, selfabsorption and self-doubt and self-blame about sexual acts.
+
+6. Clinically harmful levels of shame, self-consciousness, self-doubt and self-blame are even more prominent among victims of molestations than among the general population.
+
+7. Molested teenagers are particularly vulnerable to wrongful manipulations and special clinical harms from the experiences of shame and humiliation. In fact, shame and efforts to cope with it played an underlying role in the harm to each plaintiff. Each was lured into Mr. Epstein's sexual lair with the promise of overcoming bodily and sexual shame by earning money and bettering their lot in life. The defendant capitalized on their sexual naiveté, insecurities and effort to better themselves, and he worked hard to overcome their shame at his enlistment of them in his selfish gratifications.
+
+8. The defendant who wishes to make their identities public is one whom the criminal justice system has already determined is a person who has already committed a crime of child molestation. That surely means he has already exploited and manipulated the girls' state of adolescent sexuality, including their embarrassment, awkwardness and bodily self-consciousness. He perverted their nascent and developing moral structures by posing as a generous, avuncular mentor who could coach them about their bodies, sex and love.
+
+The exploitation of adolescent bodies, sex and love is – from a psychoanalytic point of view – an influence on the developing moral conscience of the children, as well as on their sexual urges. Now the ravaging of their internal and private moral conscience is intended by the perpetrator to be made a public ravaging.
+
+9. Among sexual trauma victims, the insidious and destructive persistence of shame, humiliation and associated self-blame is well-documented (Finkelhor and [REDACTED], 1985). Stigmatization, as experienced by a sexual trauma victim, has especially painful and pathologic consequences. Shame lingers and becomes integrated within the adolescent victim's malleable emerging identity, character structure and self image. Moral clarity is distorted. Perceptions of self-blame and guilt are magnified. The impact of shame lends to cultivating a self image of being "spoiled goods."
+
+10. Stigmatization following sexual trauma results in long-term risks that can negatively shape multiple facets of adult development: sexual, emotional, interpersonal and vocational. Stigmatization, which is generally to be avoided among psychiatric patients, increases risks among those – as in our plaintiffs as a group – who experience clinical depression and self-destructive behaviors: drug use, criminal activity, even prostitution.
+
+Stigmatization following abuse is associated with delinquency due to increased anger and affiliation with deviant peers (Feiring et al., 2007).
+
+11. Shame and guilt are important dimensions of both complex and single event, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Symptoms of shame are associated with feelings of helplessness and powerlessness, which each of the plaintiffs endorsed experiencing in relation to Mr. Epstein.
+
+12. The DSM-IV-TR recognizes both powerlessness and helplessness as requisite parts of the traumatic experience in Criterion A for the diagnosis of posttraumatic stress disorder trauma ([REDACTED] Seligman, recent Past President of the American Psychological Association, coined relevant terms of “learned helplessness and “Loss of Personal Locus of Control.” See Seligman, M.P. 1975: Helplessness, Depression, Development and Death. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco). The teenaged girls suffered the loss of personal locus of control to a much more experienced, sexually aggressive, powerful and dominant, manipulative perpetrator.
+
+13. Releasing names of the plaintiffs to the public will reenact experiences of powerlessness and helplessness in the face of a boundary violation. Repetition and reenactment represent central features of Criterion B in the DSM-IV-TR diagnosis of posttraumatic stress disorder trauma. In effect, release of their identity and public intrusion into their personal life represents a reenactment of the shame of sexual traumatization. Repetition and reenactment are central pathologies that afflict sexual trauma survivors.
+
+14. Victims of sexual abuse often rely upon some form of dissociation, splitting or denial, as a defensive means to manage overwhelming affects associated with the sexual trauma. Each of the plaintiff girls has employed some variation of this defense, both during the massages and then subsequently following disclosure of the abuse. Primitive, maladaptive responses of this nature will become additionally reinforced as a result of public disclosure.
+
+15. Another aspect of the plaintiffs’ experience, which is recognized by DSM-IV-TR, is that the trauma was associated with human design factors (such as cruel intention to do harm, rape, torture). Trauma of this origin has a tendency to produce more “severe or long lasting” posttraumatic stress disorder than natural events (DSM IV TR p. 464). A policy of deliberate revelation of the names of the victims would reinforce the sense of design, pattern and policy of human intentions.
+
+16. Negative expectations about significant activities are noted in DSM-IV-TR, as part of Criterion C. Symptoms of foreshortened future are characteristic of a traumatized individual’s clinical course (C4). They expect revictimization. They expect bad outcomes (C7) in their social, educational, vocational, relational plans. They are hypervigilant (Criterion D4) for further trauma, and this affects lifestyle choices and future planning. Hypervigilance is part of the arousal set of criteria. Public disclosure of the victims’ identity will aggravate existing symptoms of hypervigilance.
+
+17. The DSM-IV-TR diagnostic category of “chronic” is justified for each of the plaintiffs. Scientific literature shows that the prognostic consequences of PTSD and residual effects may last for decades (U.S. Dept. of Health, 2005; *Issues in Child Abuse Prevention Number 9 Autumn 1998*: Long-term Effects of Child Sexual Abuse, Paul E Mullen and Jillian Fleming). The lasting impact upon character, identity and moral development will probably affect long-term influences upon adult development. It is more probable than not that stigmatization associated with public disclosure of the
+
+plaintiffs' identities will intensify the scope, nature and severity of the chronic symptom course.
+
+18. In addition to PTSD, shame and humiliation themselves have also been associated with causing clinical depression. Coexisting PTSD and clinical depression places the plaintiff's at increased risk for re-victimization and high risk sexual behaviors (e.g., sexually transmitted disease, premature pregnancy, rape) (Nelson, 2002), and at greater risk to victimize others (Filipas and Ullman, 2006; Desai, Centers for Disease Control, 2002) who are in their control. Studies have also shown that chronic symptoms of PTSD, in association with a single episode of Major Depressive Disorder, can produce lifetime adjustment difficulties, which include suicidality (Oquendo et al, 2005; Dube et al, CDC, 2001; Rohde, J. Am. Acad. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 2005). The plaintiffs will be additionally vulnerable to these clinical outcomes, if they suffer the stigmatization and humiliation associated with public disclosure of their identities.
+
+19. Alternative hypothesis: I have applied the evidence shown from examination and testing of the plaintiffs and relevant observations and information from other professionals while testing an alternative hypothesis: that no harm would result from public disclosure of the plaintiffs' identities. During the evaluations with the six plaintiffs, I used generally acceptable criteria for establishing whether a DSM-IV-TR disorder occurred. I established that there were provable and diagnosable injuries, primarily posttraumatic stress disorder and comorbid depression. Based upon these diagnostic signs, it is more probable than not, that exposing the plaintiff's identity to the public is not a trivial concern or one without substantial clinical repercussions. I believe that most child, adolescent and adult psychiatrists would share the opinion that additional psychiatric injury will result from such exposure.
+
+20. However, consider for the sake of argument, that my diagnostic conclusions are incorrect, notwithstanding having fulfilled standard psychiatric evaluation procedures of taking a history from multiple sources, videotaping and transcribing my initial interview, and reviewing available medical and legal documents. Even if this was the case, and my diagnostic conclusions were faulty, I believe that multiple experts, even those who may now propose publication of the victims' names, would still come to a conclusion that the plaintiff's suffered sexual abuse, and in some cases, multiple acts of ongoing abuse, at the hands of Jeffery Epstein. Even without developing a subsequent disorder, there is much clinical evidence and scientific literature showing likelihood of substantial psychiatric harm to these sexually abused plaintiffs.
+
+21. To form these conclusions, I have used my extensive experience in forming these opinions. That experience is both as a treating child psychiatrist and separately as a forensic psychiatrist. I have treated hundreds of minor patients, as well as additionally evaluated hundreds of children and adolescents who have suffered sexual abuse. I have made long term followups of many of the children and have treated many adults who have been molested as adolescents. It is my opinion, with a reasonably high degree of medical certainty that the defense motion to allow public disclosure of the plaintiffs' identities is clinically and ethically a wrongful plan. The act of revealing their identities against their wishes places the plaintiffs at risk, in the best of circumstances, of suffering
+
+an aggravation of existing diagnostic concerns. It is more probable than not that releasing personal identities will [REDACTED] an exacerbation and magnification of symptoms lending to increased risk of revictimization and retraumatization.
+
+I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing statements are true and correct, and that this declaration was executed at San Francisco, California on June 4, 2009.
+
+Sincerely,
+
+![]()Gilbert Kliman, M.D.
+
+Distinguished Life Fellow, American Psychiatric Association
+
+Senior Fellow, American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
+
+[REDACTED] Brockman Award Holder, for Distinguished Lifetime Contributions to
+
+Psychoanalysis and Psychiatry, bestowed by the American College of Psychoanalysis and Psychiatry
+
+![](_page_4_Picture_23.jpeg)
+
+State of California, City & County of San Francisco
+
+Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me on this
+
+24 day of June 2009, by Gilbert Kliman
+
+proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) who appeared before me.
+
+![]()
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740036/EFTA02740036.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740036/EFTA02740036.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..29ffe70925cf10904728eb84180638ea3b0fcbc9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740036/EFTA02740036.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,250 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740036.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 5,
+  "chars": 13382,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 12.76,
+  "image_assets": [
+    "_page_4_Picture_23.jpeg"
+  ],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "The Psychological Trauma Center \na division of Preventive Psychiatry Associates Medical Group, Inc.",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            165.24,
+            64.80000000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            443.5374755859375,
+            64.80000000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            443.5374755859375,
+            91.09259033203125
+          ],
+          [
+            165.24,
+            91.09259033203125
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "DECLARATION OF GILBERT KLIMAN, M. D.",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            172.58399999999997,
+            209.79000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            437.39581298828125,
+            209.79000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            437.39581298828125,
+            224.988037109375
+          ],
+          [
+            172.58399999999997,
+            224.988037109375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "RE: EXPECTATION OF HARM FROM DISCLOSING THE PLAINTIFFS' IDENTITIES \nIN DOES V JEFFREY EPSTEIN",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            84.456,
+            278.64
+          ],
+          [
+            464.16351318359375,
+            278.64
+          ],
+          [
+            464.16351318359375,
+            307.8580322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            84.456,
+            307.8580322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            75
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            38
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            16
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            23
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "Picture",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02740036"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740036/_page_4_Picture_23.jpeg b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740036/_page_4_Picture_23.jpeg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7b3f5b3243178b8e2ccf36401cabfa2e423a3106
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740036/_page_4_Picture_23.jpeg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:f3b3253f536944c03032708f36acdf2f7d41091c8f3c12f72cba76d93f79a2c5
+size 9951
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740041/EFTA02740041.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740041/EFTA02740041.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cef1790012099b89449507ba1f04f17644c6badf
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740041/EFTA02740041.md
@@ -0,0 +1,469 @@
+professional publications include books and peer-reviewed medical journal articles on mass disasters, most recently concerning the Attack on America.
+
+He was extensively interviewed in 1997 by CBS Dallas TV regarding psychiatric testimony concerning eleven altar boys, testimony which had resulted in a record-making jury verdict against the Archdiocese of Dallas. In April, 1998, Dr. Kliman was interviewed by Channel Four anchorwoman, Linda concerning his Salvation Army project providing the Cornerstone form of psychoanalytic psychotherapy for homeless preschoolers and toddlers,. The Cornerstone project itself was viewed on the Channel II Five O'Clock News. KGO TV interviewed Dr. Kliman concerning a forensic testimony, with a focus on a Stanford football player who had allegedly become a child molester. During the Lewinsky-Clinton matter, Kliman was interviewed by Channel 12/20 concerning psychoanalytic views of leaders having exceptional sexual access to partners and the risk of a position of power overcoming the judgments of such leaders. During 2001 following the World Trade Building terrorism, Dr. Kliman was interviewed by Channel II News and appeared on five occasions thereafter through 2003 concerning the Afghanistan and Iraq wars. In May 2003, he was discussant with U.N. Secretary General Olaru Otonu, featured on Dhubai Business TV concerning the plight of children in war.
+
+In 2004, together with the International Psychoanalytic Association, Dr. Kliman helped organize, establish and supervise a therapeutic preschool project in Buenos Aires. "Cornerstone Argentina" is now in its second year of treating severely disturbed and impoverished preschoolers, with his continuing collaboration.
+
+Following the hurricane disasters of 2005 he collaborated with Mercy Corps and the Children's Psychological Health Center to produce a mental health resource. The result, "My Katrina and Rita Story", a guided activity resource of families who had to deal with the hurricanes. Mercy Corps is distributing copies to 20,000 families.
+
+In 2005, RE DISTURBED PRESCHOOLERS Dr. Kliman helped orsgujggs establish and supervise a therapeutic project in Piedmont California, at the nonprofit Ann Center.
+
+In 2007, RE HOMELESS CHILDREN: Dr. Kliman helped establish a Reflective Network Therapy service for homeless preschoolers inSttle. He provided four days of training in that method for the Family Service Center of MI County (located in Seattle), and created an organizational link between The Family Services Center and The Children's Psychological Health Center, Inc. of San Francisco in order to continue serving homeless children in Seattle.
+
+In 2008, Dr. Kliman activated the Reflective Network Therapy services for preschoolers in Seattle. He supervises there in person and by phone and video.
+
+In 2008, RE DISASTER SERVICES: Following the Sichuan Earthquake Disaster of May 12, 2008, Dr. Kliman established a link between Children's Psychological Health Center, Inc., Mercy Corps, and The China America Psychoanalytic Alliance. He created mental health resources (see Publications) which were licensed for mass distribution in China by Mercy Corps.
+
+In 2008, Dr. Kliman helped found a new non-profit organization called Teach with Africa and is a member of its Board of Directors.
+
+**PROFESSIONAL POSITIONS:**
+
+**Medical Director:** The Children's Psychological Health Center, Inc. (a non-profit agency), San Francisco, 1993- Responsible for standards of research. clinical treatment, clinical supervision, staff training and forensic evaluations - reporting directly to the Board of Directors. **Psychiatric Consultant:** Ann [REDACTED] Center, Piedmont, CA. **Psychiatric Consultant:** [REDACTED] County Family Services, Seattle, WA. **Private Practice: Medical Director**, The Psychological Trauma Center, (a division of Preventive Psychiatry Associates, Medical Group, Inc.), San Francisco, 1989-. **Chief Psychiatric Consultant**, Children's Garden, San Rafael, CA, 1990-1991. (Children's Garden is a residential [REDACTED] care facility, consisting of group care cottages and a school.) **Director**, Preventive Psychiatry Services and Unit for Study of Mass Violence and Genocide, St. Mary's Hospital, San Francisco, CA 1987-1989. Private practice of Psychiatry and Psychoanalysis (Adult, Child, and Adolescent), San Francisco, CA, 1985-. **Director** and **Principal Investigator**, [REDACTED] Care Study Unit, Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, N.Y., 1984-87. **Associate Clinical Professor**, Columbia University, Department of Child Psychiatry, New York, N.Y., 1985-87. **Founder**, **Editor-in-Chief**, the Journal of Preventive Psychiatry, New York, N.Y., 1980-. **Principal Investigator**, NIMH project ("Preventive Mental Health Services for Children Entering [REDACTED] Care"), The Center for Preventive Psychiatry, [REDACTED] Plains, N.Y., 1979-1985. **Consultant**, Children's Television Workshop, New York 1976. **Assistant Clinical Professor**, Mount Sinai Medical School, Department of Psychiatry, New York, N.Y., 1969-70. **Director**, Preventive Psychiatry Service, Elmhurst General Hospital, Queens, N.Y., 1969-70
+
+**GRANTS AWARDED:**
+
+Grants have been received as Principal Investigator for research and service in preventive psychiatry from: The Aaron Norman Foundation, American Chai Trust, [REDACTED] Barrie Foundation, Bydale Foundation, Cheesborough Pond's Inc., Ciba-Giegy Corporation, Julius H. & Bessie R. Cohn Foundation, David and Ruth Kosh Foundation, James [REDACTED] Foundation, Estate of Florence Mascias, Birny Mason Foundation, The Charles and Emma Goldmann Foundation, The Haas Foundation, The Savin Corporation, The Harris Foundation, The Abelard Foundation, AMF Corporation, CNA Financial Corporation, D. & R. Gottesman Foundation, Stella & Charles Guttman Foundation, Longhill Charities, Virginia & Leonard Marx Foundation, The Klingenstein Foundation, The Lavanburg-Corner House Foundation, Herman Muehlstein Foundation, Nestle Corporation, Louise Ottinger Charitable Trust, Pettus Crowe Foundation, Edward & Ellen Roche Relief Foundation, Samuel Rubin Foundation, Savin Business Machines Corp., S. & H. Scheuer Foundation, [REDACTED] Tannenbaum Foundation.
+
+Grants have been received as Principal Investigator for a project to develop nonmedical training in Early Childhood Psychotherapy from: The Cleveland Foundation, The Van Ameringen Foundation. A grant was received for equipment for preschool therapeutic services, from: The Hecksher Foundation. Grants have been received as Principal Investigator for Research in the Etiology of Early Childhood Psychosis from: The Boehm Foundation. Grants have been received as Principal Investigator for Research in Assessment of Preventive Clinical Interventions with Children Entering [REDACTED] Family Care, from: The National Institute of Mental Health (Grant # RO1 MH 27944), and The Harris Foundation. Grants received as Principal Investigator, The Columbia University [REDACTED] Care Study Unit, for development of preventive interventions with [REDACTED] children, from the following foundations: The Daniel and Florence Guggenheim
+
+Foundation, The Dreyfus Foundation, The Seth Sprague Foundation, The Gralnick Foundation, The Harris Foundation, U.S. Trust, and The Scheuer Family Foundation.
+
+Most recent grants:
+
+1996-2002: Support from The Office of Education, Division of Special Education, San Mateo County, California.
+
+1996 The Windholz Foundation, San Francisco, for video documentation of an experimental project concerning treatment of disturbed and traumatized preschool patients in a public education special education division.
+
+1999 Morris Stulsaft Foundation for video-recording facility to document treatment in The Cornerstone Therapeutic School.
+
+1999-2001 The Cadence Corporation - for early childhood treatment services
+
+2000-2001 The Harris Foundation for Cornerstone Therapeutic School.
+
+2000 Funding and Recognition by the State of California: In 2001, The Department of Education, Division of Special Education, certified the Cornerstone Therapeutic School as a nonpublic special education school, allowing public entities to fund the school by contracts with Unified School Districts.
+
+2001 The San Francisco Day Care Corporation — for Cornerstone Therapeutic School.
+
+2001 The Sophie Murvis Foundation for Training of Teachers and Therapists in the Cornerstone Method.
+
+2002, 2003. The Five Foundation for development of The Cornerstone Therapeutic Preschool 2003.
+
+2005 The Sophie Murvis Foundation grant for Training of Teachers and Therapists in the Cornerstone Method.
+
+2005 Mercy Corps for creation of "My Personal Story about Hurricanes Katrina and Rita"
+
+2008 Mercy Corps for creation of "My Sichuan Earthquake Story"
+
+#### JANUSZ KORCZAK INTERNATIONAL LITERARY PRIZE:
+
+First place, International Literary Prize including an award of one thousand dollars, for "World's Best Book Concerning the Well-Being of Children"—Awarded to Gilbert Kliman, M.D. and Albert Rosenfeld, co-authors of Responsible Parenthood published by Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1980
+
+#### PUBLISHED PAPERS AND BOOKS:
+
+1. 01. "Adrenal Medullary Function," in G. [REDACTED] *Yearbook of Endocrinology*, Yearbook Publishers, 1955.
+2. 02. Improved Visual Recognition in Hypnotic Versus Control State," *Archives of General Psychiatry*, Vol. 7:155-162, October 1962.
+3. 03. *Children and the Death of a President*, Editor and Contributor (with Martha Wolfenstein, Ph.D.), Doubleday & Company, New York, 1965.
+4. 04. Oedipal Themes in Children's Reactions to the Assassination of President Kennedy," in Wolfenstein and Kliman, *Children and the Death of a President*, Doubleday, New York, 1965.
+5. 05. "The Role of Stimulus Ambiguity in Hypnotic Recognition," (with Eugene Goldberg, M.D.), *Arch. Gen. Psychiat.* 14: 100, Jan. 1966.
+6. 06. "Sharing Truths for Mental Health," in *Mental Health in Our Daily Life*. Mental Health Association, [REDACTED] Plains, New York, 1966.
+7. 07. "A Psychoanalyst Looks at [REDACTED] Violence as a Factor in Black Violence," The Center for Preventive Psychiatry, 1968.
+8. 08. Teacher Recognition of Psychiatric Needs Among Preschoolers," The Center for Preventive Psychiatry, 1968.
+9. 09. *Psychological Emergencies of Childhood*. Grune and [REDACTED], New York, 1968.
+10. 10. "A Psychiatrist Speaks Out: 3,000 Blighted Children of Westchester," The Center for Preventive Psychiatry, 1969.
+11. 11. "On a Vacuum in Mental Health Practices," The Center for Preventive Psychiatry, 1969.
+12. 12. "Psychological Management of the Dying Child," in W. Kutscher (Ed.) *Death and Bereavement*, Charles C. [REDACTED] Company, Springfield, Ill. 1969.
+13. 13. "The Unique Function of the Teacher in an Experimental Therapeutic Nursery School" (with Doris Ronald), The Center for Preventive Psychiatry, [REDACTED] Plains, New York, 1970.
+14. 14. The Open Family Series (Consultant Editor, with Sarah Bonnett [REDACTED], author). A series of five books entitled *About Dying, Making Babies, That New Baby, A Hospital Story*, and *About Handicaps*, [REDACTED] Publishing Co., New York, 1974.
+15. 15. "Death in the Family—Its Impact on Children," Terry [REDACTED] Klein Memorial Lecture. *Behavioral Sciences Tape Library*, Leonia, New Jersey, 1974.
+16. 16. "Death of a Parent Occurring During a Child's Analysis," in *Trauma: Monograph V of the Monograph Series of the Ernst Kris Study Group*, New York, 1974.
+17. 17. "A Case of a Dying Child," in *Trauma: Monograph V of the Monograph Series of the Ernst Kris Study Group*, New York Psychoanalytic Institute, International Universities Press, New York, 1974.
+18. 18. "Analyst in the Nursery: Application of Child Analytic Techniques in a Therapeutic Nursery," *The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child*, Volume 30, New York Times Publishing Company, 1975.
+19. 19. "A Study of Maternal Depression in the First Two Years of Life: A Possible Contributing Factor in the Etiology of Infantile Psychosis and Neurosis" (with Judyth Katz), The Center for Preventive Psychiatry, [REDACTED] Plains, New York, 1975.
+20. 20. Introduction to *Love and Mankind's Future*, by Alexander Arzoumanian, Persepolis Press, New York, 1976.
+21. 21. "Preventive Measures in Childhood Bereavement," in Linzer, N. *Understanding Bereavement and Grief*, Yeshiva University Press, New York, 1977.
+22. 22. "Childhood Mourning: A Taboo Within a Taboo," in Gerber, I., Wiener, A., Kutscher, A., et al., *Perspectives on Bereavement*, MSS Information Corporation, New York, 1979.
+
+1. 23. "Mourning, Memory, and Reconstruction: The Analysis of a Four-Year-Old Maternally Bereaved Girl at Age Sixteen Months" (With [REDACTED], Ph.D.), in *The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child*, Volume 34, The New York Times Press, New York, 1979.
+2. 24. "Facilitation of Mourning During Childhood," in Gerber, I., Wiener, A., Kutscher, A., et al., *Perspectives on Bereavement*, MSS Information Corporation, New York, 1979.
+3. 25. "The Cornerstone Treatment of a Preschool Boy from an Extremely Impoverished Environment" (with [REDACTED], Ph.D.), *The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child*, Vol. 35, The New York Times Press, New York, 1980.
+4. 26. *Responsible Parenthood: The Child's Psyche Through the Six-Year Pregnancy*, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York, 1980.
+5. 27. "Death: Some Implications in Child Development and Child Analysis," in *Advances in Thanatology*, Vol. 4, No. 2, Arno Press, New York, 1980.
+6. 28. "Children in [REDACTED] Care: A Preventive Service and Research Program for a High Risk Population" (with M. Harris Schaeffer, [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], and Bernard G. Pasquariella). *The Journal of Preventive Psychiatry*, Volume I: 1, 1981.
+7. 29. Editorial(s). *The Journal of Preventive Psychiatry*. Volume I, 1981-1982, Volume II, 1983-4, Volume III, 1985-7, Volume IV, in press.
+8. 30. *Preventive Mental Health Services for Children Entering [REDACTED] Family Care: An Assessment* (with M. Harris Schaeffer, and M. [REDACTED]). The Center for Preventive Psychiatry, [REDACTED] Plains, New York, 1982.
+9. 31. "Summary of Two Psychoanalytically Based Service and Research Projects: Preventive Treatments for [REDACTED] Children" with M. Harris Schaeffer, Ph.D. *J. of Preventive Psychiatry*, Vol. II, No. 1, 1983.
+10. 32. "Three New Areas in Litigation on behalf of Children," in *Child Psychiatry and the Law*, Diane Schekty, Editor, Volume 2, Bruner/Mazel, New York, 1985.
+11. 33. *Preventive Psychiatry: Early Intervention and Situational Crisis Management*, co-editor, with S.C. Klagsbrun, M.D., E.J. Clark, Ph.D., others. The Charles Press, Philadelphia, 1989.
+12. 34. *My Earthquake Story: A Guided Workbook for Children, Parents and Teachers*, with Harriet Wolfe, M.D. and Edward Oklan, M.D. Psychological Trauma Center Press, Kentfield, CA. October, 1989.
+13. 35. "Facilitation of Mourning During Childhood," chapter in *Preventive Psychiatry: Early Intervention and Situational Crisis Management*. (Eds) S. Klagsbrun, G. Kliman, E. Clark, A. Kutscher, R. DeBellis, C. Lambert. The Charles Press, Philadelphia, 1989.
+14. 36. "Toward Preventive Intervention in Early Childhood Object Loss," chapter in Noshpitz, H. and Coddington, D. (Eds) *Stressors and Clinical Techniques in Child Psychiatry*. Charles [REDACTED], NY, 1990.
+15. 37. "Brief Report: Loss of Parental Services—A Guide to Categorization." *J. Preventive Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines* 4:1, 1990. Human Sciences Press, NYC.
+16. 38. "A Methodologic Breakthrough: The Saga of Delivering Effective Primary Preventive Psychotherapy to Groups of [REDACTED] Children." *J. Preventive Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines* 4:1, 1990. Human Sciences Press, NYC.
+17. 39. "The Rise of Adolf Hitler and Other Genocidal Leaders—Psychoanalytic and Historical Symposium (Summary)," *J. Preventive Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines* 4:1, 1990. Human Sciences Press, NYC.
+
+1. 40. Kliman, G. et al (2007). *"Facilitating Effective Coping in Children Following Disasters: A Psychoanalytic Informed Guided Narrative Intervention."* J. Am Psan. Assoc. In Press
+2. 41. Kliman, G. and M.H. Schaeffer, Ph.D. "A Breakthrough in Prediction and Prevention: Diagnoses as Social Predictors for [REDACTED] Children." *J. Preventive Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines* 4:1, 1990 Human Sciences Press, NYC.
+3. 42. "My Flood Story—a Guided Activity Workbook for Children, Families and Teachers," co-authored with Edward Oklan, M.D., Family Development Press, 1010 Sir Francis Drake Blvd, Kentfield, CA 94960.
+4. 43. "My Earthquake Story, A Guided Activity Workbook for Children, Families and Teachers," co-authored with Harriet Wolfe, M.D., Preventive Psychiatry Associates Medical Group, Inc., 2105 Divisadero Street, San Francisco, CA 94115 and Edward Oklan, M.D., Family Development Press, 1010 Sir Francis Drake Blvd, Kentfield, CA 94960.
+5. 44. "Field Notes: [REDACTED] Care: The Personal Life History Book: A Psychoanalytically Based Intervention for [REDACTED] Children," *Journal for the Psychoanalysis of Culture & Society*, Fall 1996 1:2. 159-162.
+6. 45. Kliman G and Zelman A. (1996). "Use of a Personal Life History Book in the Treatment of [REDACTED] Children--An Attempt to Enhance Stability of [REDACTED] Care Placements." Chapter in Zelman A (ed). *Early Intervention with High-Risk Children: Freeing Prisoners of Circumstance*. Jason Aronson, Northvale, NJ. 105-124.
+7. 46. "Cornerstone Project: Analysis in Special Ed Classes," *The American Psychoanalyst*, 1997. 31:2. 27-28
+8. 47. "My Book about Kosovo - a Guided Activity Workbook for Kosovo Children, Families, and their Teachers." English and Albanian Editions, CPHC, 1999, San Francisco.
+9. 48. "My Book about the Attack on America", A Guided Activity Workbook for Children, Families and Teachers, coauthored with Ed Oklan, M.D. and Ann Oklan, M.D. 2001, CPHC, San Francisco.
+10. 49. "Helping Patients and their Families Cope in a National Disaster", The S.F. Medical Society, January 2002. Reprinted in J. L.A. Medical Society, March 2002.
+11. 50. Discussion of Reactive Attachment Disorder. Developmental Pediatrics. 2003.
+12. 51. "My Personal Story About Hurricanes Katrina and Rita - a guided activity workbook to help coping, learning and Healthy expression." The Children's Psychological Health Center, Sept. 24, 2005 San Francisco. Derivative editions by Mercy Corps, Portland, OR.
+13. 52. "My Personal Story About Tropical Storm Stan" English Ed. Feb. 24, 2006, The Children's Psychological Health Center. *Spanish Translation " Mi Historia De La Tormenta Stan" Feb. 2006*
+14. 53. Israeli Terror Book
+15. 54. "Methods for Maximizing the Good Effects of [REDACTED] Care: Evidence Based Strategies to Prevent Discontinuities of [REDACTED] Care and Raise I.Q." International Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies, April, 2006
+16. 55. "My Personal Story about being Homeless" A Guided Activity Workbook to help Children Cope. The Children's Psychological Health Center Jan 15, 2008
+17. 56. "My Sichuan Earthquake Story - A Guided Activity Workbook to help Children Cope" 85 pages. First English Edition May 22, 2008 available for download online at [www.childrenspsychological.org](http://www.childrenspsychological.org). Mandarin edition by CPHC and China America Analytic Association, in press with Mercy Corps June 2, 2008.
+
+---
+
+- 57. "My Hurricane Story" A Guided Activity Workbook to help Children Cope. The Children's Psychological Health Center. Sept 21, 2008
+
+---
+
+**WORKS IN PROGRESS:** available in Draft:
+
+IQ Rise among Preschoolers with Pervasive Developmental Disorders.
+
+Child Psychoanalytic Contributions to Civil Justice System, submitted by invitation, to Psychoanalytic Inquiry
+
+Books in Draft:
+
+- 1. Reflective Network Therapy: Early Childhood Psychotherapy in the Classroom
+- 2. A Unifying New Theory of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
+
+**PRESENTATIONS:**
+
+- 01. "Specific Traumas: Selective Review of Literature," presented at the Ernst Kris Study Group, New York Psychoanalytic Institute, New York, 1965.
+- 02. "Psychoanalysis of a Four-Year-Old in a Preschool Group," presented at the American Psychoanalytic Association, Atlantic City, New Jersey, May, 1966
+- 03. "Covert Suicidal Impulses in Maternally Deprived Children" (with Harriet Lubin, M.S.W.), presented at the American Association of Psychiatric Services for Children, Boston, Massachusetts, November, 1969.
+- 04. Children's Reactions to National Events: The 1968 Federal Elections," presented at the American Orthopsychiatric Association, Washington, D.C., 1969.
+- 05. "Facilitation of Mourning During Childhood," presented at the Chicago Psychoanalytic Institute, May 1973.
+- 06. "Preventive Approaches to Preschool Psychiatric Disorders: Some Assessments," presented at the Academy of Child Psychiatry, Washington, D.C., October, 1973.
+- 07. "Biological Drive Derivative Cycles in Preschool Patients," presented at the New York Psychoanalytic Institute Research Seminar, 1974.
+- 08. "Children in National Disasters," presented at the International Association for Child Psychiatry, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 1974.
+- 09. "Childhood Mourning: Some Social Aspects," presented at Yeshiva University, New York, October, 1974.
+- 10. "The Center for Preventive Psychiatry's Interventions with Bereaved Children," presented at the second annual conference on "The Impact of Bereavement and Grief on the Family," Yeshiva University, October 15, 1975.
+- 11. "Death: Implication for Psychoanalytic Theory and Practice," presented at The Association for Psychoanalytic Medicine, New York, 1977.
+- 12. "A Psychoanalytic View of an Ancient Mass Disaster: The Mayan Exodus," The Center for Preventive Psychiatry, 1977.
+
+1. 13. "A Psychoanalytic View of Preventive Psychiatry," presented at Stockbridge, Mass., December, 1977.
+2. 14. "The Self-Concept and Healthy Narcissism: Relevance to Preventive Psychiatry," presented at the Westchester Psychoanalytic Society, [REDACTED] Plains, New York, 1978.
+3. 15. "Special Problems of the Single Parent Child," presented at Department of Child Psychiatry, Rutgers Medical School and published by Jason Aronson Psychotherapy Tape Library, New York, 1978.
+4. 16. "The Self-Concept: Its Significance in Prevention of Mental Illness," presented at The Alumni Association of the Chicago Psychoanalytic Institute, Child Psychotherapy Program, Chicago, 1978.
+5. 17. "Treatment of an Impoverished Intellectually Retarded Ghetto Child by the Cornerstone Method" (with [REDACTED] Ph.D.), presented at the American Psychoanalytic Association, New York, 1979.
+6. 18. "Preventive Approaches Among [REDACTED] Children Using Modern Theory of Narcissism," presented at The Department of Psychiatry, Mountainside Hospital, Symposium on Primary Prevention of the Mental and Behavioral Disorders, Mountainside, NJ, 1979.
+7. 19. "The Center for Preventive Psychiatry: Its Relationship to Infant Psychiatry," at the Symposium on Infant Psychiatry, The Center for Preventive Psychiatry, [REDACTED] Plains, New York, 1979.
+8. 20. "Mourning, Memory and Reconstruction," presented at The Westchester Psychoanalytic Association, [REDACTED] Plains, New York, 1980.
+9. 21. "Preliminary Report on Preventive Psychiatric Services for [REDACTED] Children," presented at American Association of Psychiatric Services for Children, 1980.
+10. 22. "Assessment of Primary Preventive Services: Children Entering [REDACTED] Family Care," presented at American Orthopsychiatric Association, May, 1981.
+11. 23. "Psychoanalytically-Based Approaches to the Problems of [REDACTED] Care: A Pilot Project," presented at the American Psychoanalytic Association Interdisciplinary Seminar on Psychoanalytic Observations of [REDACTED] Care, New York, December, 1978. See also report of this Seminar by [REDACTED], T.: "Psychoanalytic Observations of [REDACTED] Care (An Interdisciplinary Seminar of the American Psychoanalytic Association)." *The Journal of Preventive Psychiatry*, Volume I:1, 1981.
+12. 24. "A Project to Deliver and Evaluate Preventive Psychiatric Services," Columbia College of Physicians & Surgeons, Division of Child Psychiatry Grand Rounds, May, 1982.
+13. 25. "New Concepts in Litigation on Behalf of Children," presented at New York Medical College, October, 1982.
+14. 26. "Cruel Experiments of Nature: General Remarks on Childhood Bereavement and Developmental Pathology." Vulnerable Child Workshop, American Psychoanalytic Association, April, 1983.
+15. 27. Facilitation of Mourning During Childhood: Role of The Clinician," presented at New York Hospital, Westchester Division, October, 1983.
+16. 28. "A Questionnaire for Surveying the Practice of Preventive Psychiatry," presented at the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, Prevention Committee, October, 1983.
+17. 29. "Experiences and Problems in Research Concerning Childhood Bereavement," presented at Department of Psychiatry, University of Ottawa, November, 1983.
+18. 30. "Prediction and Prevention with [REDACTED] Children" (co-authored with M. Harris Schaeffer, Ph.D.), presented at American Psychiatric Association, May, 1984.
+19. 31. "Preventive Psychiatry as Applied to [REDACTED] Children," Grand Rounds, [REDACTED] Porter Psychiatric Institute, 1985.
+20. 32. "The Childhood of Adolf Hitler," with Robert Pois, Ph.D., The American Psychoanalytic Association, Denver, May 1985.
+
+1. 33. Seminar on "New Areas in Forensic Psychiatry," at the Robert [REDACTED] law firm, San Francisco, 1986. VIDEOTAPE AVAILABLE
+2. 34. "Children's Reactions to the Challenger Shuttle Disaster," on 20/20 (Television Broadcast), 1986. VIDEOTAPE AVAILABLE
+3. 35. The Fathering of Adolf Hitler," Grand Rounds, McAuley Neuropsychiatric Institute, St. Mary's Hospital, San Francisco, 1986.
+4. 36. "Child Sexual Abuse: Psychoanalytic and Forensic Approaches," Children's Hospital, San Francisco, 1986. VIDEOTAPE AVAILABLE
+5. 37. "Preventive Psychiatry for Children," Training Seminar at McAuley Neuropsychiatric Institute, St. Mary's Hospital, San Francisco, 1987. VIDEOTAPE AVAILABLE
+6. 38. "Multi-Victim Child Sexual Abuse," San Francisco Psychoanalytic Institute Extension Division, October 1987. VIDEOTAPE AVAILABLE
+7. 39. "Children in [REDACTED] Families: Advances in Preventive Psychiatry," Continuing Education Program for Psychiatrists, U.C. [REDACTED], 1988.
+8. 40. "The Mothering of Adolf Hitler," Grand Rounds. McAuley Neuropsychiatric Institute, St. Mary's Hospital, San Francisco, Dec. 1988.
+9. 41. "Adolf Hitler's Mothering: A Child Psychoanalytic View," Westchester Psychoanalytic Society, New York Hospital, January, 1989.
+10. 42. "The Personal Life History Book: Preventive Psychotherapy for Children in Chaos." Department of Child Psychiatry, Harlem Hospital, New York, NY, January, 1989.
+11. 43. Chairman: Symposium April 20-21, 1989. The Rise of Adolf Hitler and Other Genocidal Leaders. Interdisciplinary Unit for Study of Mass Violence and Genocide. St. Mary's Hospital Department of Psychiatry, San Francisco.
+12. 44. "The Mothering of Adolf Hitler," Symposium above. VIDEOTAPE AVAILABLE
+13. 45. "The Fathering of Adolf Hitler," Symposium above. VIDEOTAPE AVAILABLE
+14. 46. Public Media: Following the October 17th earthquake, Dr. Kliman and his Psychological Trauma Center associates appeared on KRON-TV, KFAS, KQED and public service radio network to offer advice and respond to call-in questions regarding earthquake stress and trauma. His *Earthquake Story* guided workbook (see above) was distributed as a public service by San Francisco Community Mental Health Services and the Oakland Bureau of Education to 11,000 teachers in Oakland and San Francisco.
+15. 47. [REDACTED] Psychoanalytic Society: (April 1990) "Simultaneous child and couple therapy: emergence and interpretation of congruent unconscious themes."
+16. 48. University of California College of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Irvine. (June 1990) "Prevention of Psychopathology among Children: Systematic Projects with [REDACTED] Children."
+17. 49. Preventive Interventions with Traumatized Children," Grand Rounds California Pacific Hospital Department of Psychiatry, October 20, 1992. VIDEOTAPE AVAILABLE.
+18. 50. Altered Interpersonal Schemas After Life Threatening Childhood Trauma," Center for Study of Consciousness, UCSF, October 1992.
+19. 51. Alterations of Pre-Traumatic Memory and Post Traumatic Schemas," Child Analysis Colloquium, San Francisco Psychoanalytic Institute, November 1992.
+20. 52. Toward A New Theory of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder," Control Mastery Group, San Francisco Psychoanalytic Institute, December 1992.
+21. 53. Severe Psychological Trauma in Very Young Children," Grand Rounds at the Menninger-San Mateo County Hospital Psychiatric Residency Program, March 23, 1993.
+22. 54. Psychological Crises Among Preschoolers," Department of Health, City of San Francisco, April 1993.
+23. 55. Child Analysis Colloquium," San Francisco Psychoanalytic Institute, May 1993.
+
+1. 56. "Loss of Parental Services—a Guide for Clinicians and Attorneys," Children's Psychological Trauma Center, September 16, 1993. (120 min. VIDEOTAPE AVAILABLE.)
+2. 57. Catastrophic Levels of Psychological Trauma—a Guide for Clinicians and Attorneys," Children's Psychological Trauma Center, September 27, 1993 (120 min. VIDEOTAPE AVAILABLE.)
+3. 58. Systematic Preventive Interventions with ██████ Children," Keynote Address, Western Pennsylvania Psychiatric Institute Conference on Adoption and ██████ Care, Sept. 22, 1993.
+4. 59. Cost Benefits of Preventive Interventions with ██████ Children," American Behavioral Health Institute, San Francisco, Sept. 28, 1993. (60 min. VIDEOTAPE AVAILABLE.)
+5. 60. True and False Allegations of Child Molestation," Children's Psychological Trauma Center, October 1, 1993. (120 min. VIDEOTAPE AVAILABLE).
+6. 61. Severe Psychological Trauma in Childhood—Some New Observations," Grand Rounds, Dept. of Child Psychiatry, Oakland Children's Hospital, Oct. 7, 1993. (60 min. VIDEOTAPE AVAILABLE.)
+7. 62. Preventive Approaches in Severe Psychological Trauma," Bar Association of San Francisco, October 28, 1993. (90 min. VIDEOTAPE AVAILABLE.)
+8. 63. New Theory of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder," Pediatric Grand Rounds California Pacific Hospital, Nov. 5, 1993.
+9. 64. Preventing Depression in Yourself, Your Clients and Your Co-Workers," San Francisco Bar Association, San Francisco, CA, December 2, 1993.
+10. 65. A New Theory of Post Traumatic Disorders," Center for Preventive Psychiatry, ██████ Plains, NY, January 11, 1994.
+11. 66. KRON-TV, "Helping Children Deal with Earthquake Stress," San Francisco, CA, January 20, 1994.
+12. 67. Samuel Kahn Memorial Lecture, The Center for Preventive Psychiatry, ██████ Plains, N.Y. Topic, "Catastrophic Traumas of Childhood—New Findings, New Theory, New Therapeutic Tasks," February 28, 1994.
+13. 68. "Preventing Job Stress: The Disease of the 20th Century," San Francisco Bar Association, San Francisco, CA, March 25, 1994.
+14. 69. "Controlled Assessment of Psychoanalytically Derived Psychotherapy with ██████ Children," American Psychoanalytic Association, Philadelphia, PA, May 1994.
+15. 70. "A senior researcher's subjective experience of a new hypothesis," California School of Professional Social Work Studies. Commencement Address, May 1994.
+16. 71. "Oppositionalism Among Traumatized Children," International Association Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, San Francisco, CA, July 23, 1994.
+17. 72. "New Theory of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder," International Association Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, San Francisco, CA, July 25, 1994.
+18. 73. "Violence Against Young Children—Children in War," Co-sponsored by San Francisco Psychoanalytic Institute, San Francisco, CA, July 26, 1994.
+19. 74. "Method for Treatment of Preschool Psychiatric Patients in Groups," American Psychoanalytic Association, Philadelphia, PA, December 15, 1994.
+20. 75. "A New Theory of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder," Control-Mastery Research Group, San Francisco Psychoanalytic Institute, March 31, 1995.
+21. 76. "New Theory of Child Abuse Effects," T.A.S.K., Monterey, CA, April 1, 1995.
+22. 77. "Psychological Trauma, Day Care and Mental Health," San Francisco Psychoanalytic Institute Extension Division. April 26, 1995.
+23. 78. "Special Problems of Medical Ethics in Psychiatric Treatment: Child Abuse Concerns," San Francisco Psychoanalytic Institute Research Group, June 30, 1995.
+
+- 79. "Operational Confumation of aPsychoanalytic Hypothesis: Detecting and Interfering with The Repetition Compulsion," Cleveland Psychoanalytic Institute and Anni Katan Center for Child Development, October 28, 1995.
+- 80. The Personal Life History Book Method: Reducing Transfers Among a Family Homes," The Center for Preventive Psychiatry, =Plains, NY, October 30, <sup>19</sup>
+- 81. "A New Theory of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder," Grand Rounds, Baylor University School of Medicine, Houston, November 8, 1995.
+- 82. "Raising IQ's in aTherapeutic Nursery: The Cornerstone Method. How it works as illustrated by video clips of the therapist and patients in the classroom," The Houston Psychoanalytic Institute and Stedman West Child Development Center, Houston, TX, November 8, 1995.
+- 83. "The Difficult Client: Accredited Continuing Legal Education seminar for California Attorneys." The Psychological Trauma Center, The Psychological Trauma Center, 1996.
+- 84. "Catastrophic injuries and psychological trauma: Accredited Continuing Legal Education seminar for California Attorneys." The Psychological Trauma Center, 1996.
+- 85. "Why Small Clients Get Large Awards: Proving and Disproving Psychological Injuries in Childhood. Accredited Continuing Legal Education seminar for California Attorneys." 1996
+- 86. "A New Public Health Approach in Public Special Education: Presentation to The San Mateo Board of Education," San Mateo, CA. April 17,19%.
+- 87. A new model for special education of preschoolers: The Cornerstone Method -- for synergy between early childhood education and psychotherapy. California State Dept. Education, Division of Special Education September 1996, Red Lion Hotel, Orange County Airport, CA.
+- 88. "Synergy Between Special Education and Psychotherapy in the Classroom: Special Education Learning Program Administrators," San Mateo, CA. October 10, 1996.
+- 89. "The Role of Psychoanalyst as Forensic Expert in Catastrophic Psychological Trauma Cases." American Psychoanalytic Association, Winter Meeting, Waldorf Astoria, NY. December 1996
+- 90. "Controlled Assessment of aPsychoanalytically Derived Psychotherapy." American Psychoanalytic Association, Winter Meeting, Waldorf Astoria, NY December 1996.
+- 91. "Child Psychotherapy Course: Several preschool patients with different diagnosis, treated in <sup>a</sup>preschool therapeutic nursery, showing response to interpretations, with discussions of the role of teacher, parents and medications." San Francisco Psychoanalytic Institute, March 4, 11, 18, 1997
+- 92. "Synergy between Psychotherapy and early childhood special education" SELPA Administrators, April 17, 1997
+- 93. "Analyst in the Nursery: The Cornerstone Method," San Francisco Psychoanalytic Institute, May 21, 1997
+- 94. "Psychological Trauma Among Preschoolers," San Francisco Psychoanalytic Institute, May 15, 1997
+- 95. ACT for Mental Health, April 17, <sup>1997</sup>
+- 96. "New Theory of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder," Fifth European Conference on Traumatic Stress, European Society for Traumatic Stress Studies, July 1, 1997.
+- 97. The Cornerstone Method: Intensive Preschool Psychotherapy in Public School Special Education Classes. California State Federation/Council for Exceptional Children 48th Annual Conference & Special Education Fall Conference, San Francisco, CA, October 21- 24, 1998.
+- 98. Research and treatment with highly traumatized preschoolers. Institute, Berkeley, Feb. 4, 2002.
+
+1. 99. Five year and thirty-three year follow ups of early childhood psychotherapy: Some startling findings among children treated by The Cornerstone Method. Grand Rounds, Dept. of Psychiatry, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, February 1, 2000. (VIDEOTAPE AVAILABLE).
+2. 100. Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and new methods of treatment. Department of Mental Health, State of Oklahoma, and Dept. of Psychiatry, Oklahoma State College of Medicine. Two Days of Workshops and Seminars to fellows, residents in psychiatry and child psychiatry, medical students, and mental health clinicians. October 22, 23 2000.
+3. 101. A Psychoanalytic Treatment of Young Children: Surprisingly Measurable Positive Outcomes”, San Francisco Psychoanalytic Institute - Extension Division Discussion for Clinicians, 03.05.2001
+4. 102. Regarding the 9/11/2002 Attack on America.
+
+2001-2002 Attack on America Events: 2001-2002 Public Health/ Public Education Activities:
+
+Seminar for Parents on Crisis Management following 9/11: Convent of Sacred Heart Elementary School Seminar for Teachers on Crisis Management following 9/11: Stuart █ and Convent of Sacred Heart Elementary Schools Federal Emergency Management Agency: Web-Site Linkage for CPHC's advice to parents and teachers American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry: Web-Site Linkage for free copies of guided activity workbook for children, parents and teachers.
+
+American Psychoanalytic Association: Web-site linkage for free copies of guided activity workbook for children, parents and teachers.
+
+Channel II: Three interviews on primary prevention of the effects of psychological trauma and terror
+
+Channel II: Three interviews on secondary prevention via early life psychiatric treatment of children
+
+1. 103. Day Long Workshop on The Cornerstone Method. The Children's Psychological Health Center, Feb. 4, 2001, San Francisco.
+2. 104. Child psychoanalysis. San Francisco Psychoanalytic Institute. Six seminars to child analysts and advanced students, using illustrations from parent-permitted videos of the author's recent treatment work with young children.
+3. 105. Theory and Intervention regarding Early Childhood Trauma: Extension Division, San Francisco Psychoanalytic Institute.
+4. 106. Educating and treating disturbed young children: Office of Education, County of San Mateo, ten conferences a year. (1995- 2002)
+5. 107. The Cornerstone Method of educating and treating disturbed young children: 45 conferences a year, Children's Psychological Health Center, San Francisco. (1999- continuing)
+6. 108. New methods for treatment of traumatized and/or developmentally disordered young children. Northern California Mental Health Association, February 9, 2002. A day long workshop. Eureka, Ca.
+7. 109. Research and treatment with disturbed and traumatized young children. █ Institute, Berkeley, Feb 4, 2002.
+
+- 110. Presentations of video-taped child treatment sessions: The Child Analysis Study Group of the San Francisco Psychoanalytic Institute, six occasions 2001-2002.
+- 111. New Theory and New Treatments of Children. Northern California Society of Mental Health Professionals. Feb 8, 2002.
+- 112. Treatment of Children in their Real Life Spaces. Ann Center, Berkeley, CA February 2, 2002.
+- 113. Treatment of children in community school settings. Workshop on Community Child Psychiatry. American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. October 2002.
+- 114. Treatment of preschoolers in real life space The Cornerstone Method. A two day training workshop for the L.A. County Dept. of Mental Health. October 2002.
+- 115. The Cornerstone Method. The American Psychoanalytic Association, Workshop on Early Childhood. January 2003, New York.
+- 116. Treatment of Three Autistic Preschoolers: The American Psychoanalytic Association. June, 2003. Boston.
+- 117. The Personal Life History Book: A Preventive Therapy for Children. A day-long workshop at Counseling4Kids, Los Angeles, September 2003.
+- 118. A new method of treatment of autistic preschoolers. The Chinatown Child Development Center, San Francisco, December 4, 2003.
+- 119. Results of the Cornerstone Method: Pervasive Developmental Disorder with eight month to <sup>37</sup>year followup. The M.I.N.D. Institute, U.C. December 19, 2003.
+- 120. Procedures for preventing and reducing psychopathology among children. Joint Committee of AACAP and Child Welfare League, November 2003, with Marilyn Benoit, M.D.
+- 121. The Role of Child Psychiatrists in Prevention of Child Abuse: Forensic Child Psychiatry as <sup>a</sup>Societal Influence. Mensa Society, January 2004.
+- 122. Psychoanalysis Confronts Autism. The L.A. and SoCal Psychoanalytic Institutes, February 22, 2004.
+- 123. Child Psychiatric Testimony and the Leading Edge of Social Change. American College of Forensic Psychiatry, March 28, 2004
+- 124. The Cornerstone Method of Treating Autism. American Psychoanalytic Association, Boston, Mass., January 2005.
+- 125. An evidence based method for in-classroom treatment of disturbed preschoolers. Child Welfare League of America. New Orleans, Ma 2005.
+- 126. Two evidence-based methods for treating children. International Psychoanalytic Association, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, July 2005.
+- 127. A novel evidence-based method for treatment of Asperger's Disorder. Lorman Educational Seminars, Redding, CA. November 18, 2005
+- 128. "Applications of The Cornerstone Method to Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders" American Psychoanalytic Association, New York, New York. January 18, <sup>2006</sup>
+- 129. "Applying The Cornerstone Method in Public Schools" Philadelphia Board of Education April 28,06 DVD FORMAT AVAILABLE
+- 130. "Crises Intervention Techniques Within Schools: What you Need to Know When Large or Small Scale Disasters Strike" Lorman Educational Seminar, Sacramento, CA Oct. 6, <sup>2006</sup>
+- 131. "Saying Goodbye: Termination in Psychotherapy" 53"<sup>I</sup> Annual Meeting of The American ...7 Am of Child and licent Pill try, San Diego, Ca October 28, <sup>2006</sup>
+- 132. LE, Viron M, JE, A, Samples G, Klima G: A school-based mental health recovery effort. Poster session presentation at the 58th Institute on Psychiatric Services Annual Meeting, New York, NY, October 5-8, 2006.
+
+- 133. a L, Viron M JEM A, Samples G, Kliman G, O'Neill P. A School-based Mental Health Recovery Effort. Poster session presentation at ADMSEP Annual meeting. Park City, Utah, June, 2007.
+- 134. Mishkin, AD, Viron M, LE, Mt JE, Samples G, Kliman G. Reducing Post-Traumatic Stress after Hurricane Katrina: A School-Based Intervention. Poster presented at the 59th Institute on Psychiatric Services Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA, October 11-14, 2007.
+- 135. Videotape evidence for a new theory of PTSD etiology and treatment. Combined meeting of American Academy of Psychoanalysts with Academy of Psychoanalysis and Psychodynamic Psychiatry, The Marriot, Washington, D.C. May 3, 2008
+
+#### CURRENT TEACHING:
+
+Faculty Member: S.F. Psychoanalytic Institute. Eight 90 minute seminars on Pathogenesis in Early Childhood, with Focus on Psychological Trauma (a course for Candidates in the Child Analysis Program). See also Grand Rounds presentations below.
+
+#### THESIS CHAIR ACTIVITIES:
+
+Chairperson, Thesis Committee, California School of Professional Psychology, for Thesis of E. Wayrynen, M.A. concerning "Oppositional Behavior Following Childhood Sexual Abuse." 1998
+
+Chairperson, Thesis Committee, Institute, for Thesis of Miquelon Hope, Ph.D. on IQ and CGAS changes following in-classroom psychotherapy and control group. 1999.
+
+Chairperson, Thesis Committee, Pacific Graduate School of Psychology, for Tina Scovis-Weston, Ph.D., on Early Memory Changes among Twelve Boys Raped by Men. 2001.
+
+#### RECENT AND CURRENT PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION COMMITTEE WORK:
+
+Chairperson, Forensic Subcommittee of S.F. Psychoanalytic Institute, 1993-1996. Established liaison with San Francisco Bar Association for a series of Continuing Legal Education Credit seminars presented by a panel of psychoanalysts. Topics presented by G. Kliman, 1993-1994: "Post Traumatic Stress Disorder," "Prevention of Stress in the Workplace," and "Prevention of Depressive Reactions during Legal Practice." Place: S.F. Bar Association.
+
+#### CURRENT:
+
+Member, Child Development Program Committee, San Francisco Psychoanalytic Institute.
+
+Member, Child Analysis Study Group, San Francisco Psychoanalytic Institute.
+
+Member, Committee on Psychoanalysis and the Community, American Psychoanalytic Institute.
+
+Member, Joint Committee on Care: Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and the Child Welfare Association.
+
+#### PROFESSIONAL COMMENDATIONS:
+
+<sup>A</sup>letter of commendation regarding clinical work in the classroom within apublic school system:
+
+December 3, 2001
+
+To Whom It May Concern:
+
+This is to report that the San Mateo County Office of Education, Special Education programs, has benefited from the services of The Children's Psychological Health Center, specifically its Cornerstone Therapeutic School Project.
+
+We have worked together for the past six years. Under the leadership of Gilbert Kliman, M.D., the Center has trained members of our teaching and school psychology staff to carry out <sup>a</sup> mental health service on our premises. We now have acollaborative project in its sixth year for our special education preschool children with Pervasive Developmental Disorders (PDD) and for those with Serious Emotional Disorders (SED) which interfere with their education. As an alternative to sending children to <sup>a</sup>private nonpublic special education school for extremely intensive mental health services at significant cost, this project has created and provides just such intensive service within apublic preschool special class program at 65 Tower Road, San Mateo.
+
+To my knowledge, among the 30 children served so far under the collaborative project, we are seeing cognitive, social and human gains which have decreased the gap between these children and their typically developing peers. Several families and children are thriving with less intensive special education service or returned to regular education class. Not only has the family and child suffering been reduced, the burden to taxpayers is also reduced. The children have been able to remain in the community, and some who were functioning as severely autistic and retarded now appear to be developing within asomewhat normal range. We are pleased with the quality of special education services our County provides for preschoolers with PDD or SED. We are also gratified with the research results provided by The Children's Psychological Health Center.
+
+We recommend the Cornerstone project to other school systems, so that they consider it an important opportunity should they be able to collaborate similarly with The Children's Psychological Health Center. At Califirnia's common cost of \$15,000 to \$40,000 or more <sup>a</sup> year, for a special education child who needs full time special education services and auxiliary intensive help, the savings for even one child's 12-year career of intensive services in special education can be substantial. The savings from one of the successes we have seen may equal the costs of the entire Cornerstone project with the 30 children helped so far.
+
+We have not yet seen any failures. The agency is showing measurable cognitive gains for our collaborative work which, according to their research, averages 20 to 28 points in independent WPPSI testing of the children in the Cornerstone program. The techniques are far more economical to use than we have found with the Lovaas method, which we also implement for some students. We have also seen the techniques transmitted to special education teachers as well as inexperienced therapists.
+
+<sup>I</sup>invite you to visit our project in action.
+
+Sincerely,
+
+JAYS. PARMA Ed.D. Senior Administrator Special Education
+
+### MAJOR FEDERAL COURT FORENSIC ACTIVITIES:
+
+#### EVALUATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS HEARD IN FEDERAL COURT, HANNIBAL MISSOURI, November 15, 2001
+
+Under Dr. Kliman's leadership, a Children's Psychological Health Center team of five clinicians and two administrative staff has been at work since May 2, 2001 conducting a behavioral audit regarding the psychiatric conditions and the residential treatment of over 100 children (mostly ages 13 to 17) at Heartland Christian Academy, as requested by the Academy's general counsel.
+
+2001: Doe vs. Three Springs Treatment Center, Nashville, TN.
+
+2004: Does vs. L.K. Baliredy et al (An international child trafficking matter). Five days of deposition.
+
+<sup>2004</sup>Doc vs. State of New Mexico and Arthur Brokup.
+
+#### MAJOR STATE COURT CASES:
+
+#### Some cases of public health significance. concerning allegedly traumatized minors in care of governmental or institutional agencies:
+
+Does vs. OK Boys Ranch and State of Washington: 44 children in care at a state-licensed rehabilitation and care-related center were allegedly allowed to abuse each other while staff and therapists did not report harmful activities of which they knew, Dr. Kliman opined. The <sup>p</sup>laintiff children have to date all received settlements in four phases of this litigation over anine year period, with Dr. Kliman as the principal expert.
+
+York vs. ChaparralNictor Treatment Facility. Orange County Superior Court. An eleven year old child severely and chronically molested by a residential treatment staff member was evaluated and an opinion given by Dr. Kliman concerning harm and how to rehabilitate the child as much as possible. Implications for standards of residential care are contained within the case.
+
+Carlson vs. Ray-Lam Home. Orange County Superior Court. Dr. Kliman evaluated and testified concerning a twelve year old boy who was allegedly molested by a father and had
+
+to rescue himself. The father's partner was negligent, Dr. Kliman opined. The judge agreed and awarded the child compensation for psychological damages.
+
+Does vs. Archdiocese of Los Angeles. Dr. Kliman was the lead psychiatric witness. The case settled after six days of his deposition testimony.
+
+Does vs. Salesian Order Western Region. Dr. Kliman was the lead psychiatric witness. The case settled after nine days of his deposition testimony and two days of trial.
+
+Does v South Dakota School for the Deaf. Multiple boys were molested by an older student. The state school administration was allegedly negligent and major psychological damages were claimed. Dr. Kliman served as the principal plaintiffs' expert on administrative liability issues and psychological damages. The case settled with major compensation for the plaintiffs during the time of jury deliberations.
+
+### CHILD PSYCHIATRIC EXPERT TESTIMONY:
+
+Dr. Kliman helped set legal precedents for the inclusion of psychiatric testimony in matters concerning wrongful death of aparent and loss of parental services, in both New York State and California. He has testified in over 275 cases including over 100 trials. A Federal Rule 26 list is available on request and on www.expertchildpsychiatry.com. His courtroom and deposition testimony experience includes cases of institutional negligence of children leading to psychological trauma, negligent care, loss of parental services due to wrongful deaths, psychological trauma as part of personal injury of adults and children, childhood molestation, sexual harassment, termination of parental rights, and disputed custody. Since 2000 about 30% of his forensic work has been requested by defense, about 70% by plaintiffs, with the defense tasks increasing markedly in recent years.
+
+Dr. Kliman's evaluations and testimony regarding 16 children negligently cared for and abused at The Kiwanis' OK Boys' Ranch, Olympia, WA, helped lead to settlements and awards, totalling \$25,000,000. Responding to disclosures in that case, many improvements have occurred in the publicly funded and licensed institutional care of children throughout the State of Washington, according to newspaper accounts.
+
+Dr. Kliman's evaluations and opinions, together with that of The Children's Psychological Trauma Center team led by Robert Wynne MFCC, led to record-making \$8,000,000 loss of parental and other services compensation for 17 bereaved subsistence-economy Alaskan Inupiat Native Americans Ili vs. Ryan Airlines, Anchorage, 1997).
+
+Principal expert regarding institutional negligence and psychological damages in Does vs. Rudolph Kos and the Diocese of Dallas, Dallas 1997. The Catholic Church of Dallas was held liable for institutional negligence, testimony concerning the need for major psychiatric treatment <sup>p</sup>lanning was accepted by the jury, and \$119,000,000—including punitive damages against the Church--was awarded to the 11 plaintiffs, by unanimous decision.
+
+# OTHER PUBLIC HEALTH ACTIVITIES AND RECOGNITION:
+
+In Way response to the mental health needs of families following recent massive firestorms, United Children, printed and distributed 10,000 copies of "My Fire Story -- <sup>a</sup>Guided Activity Workbook for Families and Teachers," co-authored with Edward Oklan, M.D. Copies can be obtained from Family Development Press, 1010 Sir Francis Drake Boulevard, Kentfield, CA 94960. The State of Iowa purchased rights to reproduce 10,000 copies of "My Book about The Attack on America - <sup>a</sup>Guided Activity Workbook for Children, Families and Teachers", published in 2001.
+
+During 1996 - 2002 Sophie Murvis Foundation, The Windholz Foundation, The Atkinson, Cadence Corporation, Irving Harris Foundation and The Stullsaft Foundations have recently awarded grants to Dr. Kliman as principal investigator for his Cornerstone Therapeutic Nursery project, serving seriously disturbed preschoolers in the San Mateo Office of Education.
+
+Presentations on The Cornerstone Therapeutic Nursery Project have been made by Dr. Kliman during 1997 through 2002 at the San Francisco Psychoanalytic Institute and the Seattle Institute for Psychoanalysis.
+
+Three documentary videotapes concerning Dr. Kliman's psychotherapies of disturbed children treated by him using this method in atherapeutic special education class are now available for scientific and educational purposes, parental permission having been gained. Such use requires <sup>a</sup>confidentiality agreement.
+
+Tape I: The Cornerstone Method.
+
+Tape II: Treatment of an Autistic Boy
+
+Tape M: Unique Features of The Cornerstone Method
+
+As a pilot application of his techniques for preschoolers, Dr. Kliman opened a Cornerstone Therapeutic Nursery at the Salvation Army Shelter for homeless families in January 1998, Medical serving seven homeless families with preschool children. He is supervising the project weekly as Director of The Children's Psychological Trauma Center. Unedited videotapes of that project are available to scientists and educators with aconfidentiality agreement. The MI Institute has provided a psychology intern to conduct the treatment under Dr. Kliman's training and supervision. The California School of Professional Psychology has assigned a doctoral thesis candidate to Dr. Kliman's supervision to study the I.Q. rise phenomenon previously documented in Cornerstone therapies.
+
+Peer-reviewed publications of Dr. Kliman's work with children appear in Zelman, A: Interventions with High Risk Children, Jason Aronsonlitter by Kliman on Controlled Assessment of The Personal Life History Book Method for Children). Results of Dr. Kliman's Cornerstone Method are also reported extensively in that book, focusing on the I.Q. rise phenomenon.
+
+# Archive of Videotaped Seminars and Events:
+
+— Gilbert Kliman, M.D., Medical Director
+
+THE CHILDREN'S PSYCHOLOGICAL TRAUMA CENTER
+
+(A division of the Children's Psychological Health Center, Inc. )
+
+Archive of Videotaped Seminars and Events:
+
+### CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION TAPES:
+
+California MCLE credit is available to attorneys for study of these tapes. Unless otherwise indicated, Gilbert Kliman, M.D. was the sole or principal speaker. Contact Edith Lee at 415 474 0955 for MCLE credit fulfillment associated with study of these tapes.
+
+- 01. True and False Allegations of Sexual Molestations 1987. 1.5 hrs.
+- 02. Loss of Parental Services May 6th 1992 Elina Wayrynen and Gilbert Kliman, M.D. 2.0 hrs.
+- 03. Abuse in Institutions August 1" 1995, 2.0 hrs.
+- 04. Catastrophic Accidents with Lifetime Psychological Damage, December 5th 1995 2.5 hrs.
+- 05. Evaluating Psychological Trauma in Catastrophic Accidents (Grosvenor Hotel. San Francisco) 1996, 2.5 hrs.
+- 06. Loss of Parental Services (Holiday Inn),January 9th 1996, 2.5 hrs.
+- 07. Loss of Parental Services, May 12th <sup>1993</sup>1.5 hrs.
+- 08. True and False Allegations of Sexual Abuse June 7th 1993, 1.5 hrs.
+- 09. Catastrophic Psychological Traumas in Childhood, February 1994, 2.5 hrs.
+- 10. The Difficult Client February 27th 1996, 2.5 hrs.
+- 11. The Difficult Client (at Wells Fargo). February 6th 1996, 2.5 hrs.
+- 12. Evaluating the Validity of Recovered Memories: Perspective of aForensic Expert February 29th 1996, 1.0 hr.
+- 13. How Small Clients Get Large Awards, Psychological Trauma in early childhood produces life time consequences in some cases. Defense and plaintiff considerations. 2.5 hrs.
+- 14. Giving Powerful Voices to Children in Court: I, March 20th 1998. Windle Turley, Esq. With Gilbert Kliman, M.D., 2.5 hrs.
+- 15. Giving Powerful Voices to Children in Court IL May 8th 1998, John Connelly, Jr. with Gilbert Kliman, M.D., 2.5 hrs.
+
+- 16. Giving Powerful Voices to Children in Court III,June 12th 1998, Marc June, Esq. With Gilbert Kliman, M.D., 2.5 hrs.
+- 17. Psychoanalysis and the Law: How Child Psychoanalysis Contributes to Justice for Children. Conference at the San Francisco Psychoanalytic Institute, March I<sup>n</sup> 1999, Introduction by Maureen Katz, M.D., Discussion by Katherine MacVicar, M.D., Gilbert Kliman, M.D., presenter. San Francisco Psychoanalytic Institute Extension Division. 1.5 hrs.
+
+# The Children's Psychological Health Center Archive of Videotaped Seminars and Events:
+
+- Gilbert Kliman, M.D., Medical Director
+
+#### CLINICAL AND SCIENTIFIC TAPES:
+
+STARRED (\*) TAPES BELOW ARE A PRECIOUS ARCHIVE OF INFORMATION ABOUT PROBLEMS AND TREATMENT OF SEVERELY STRESSED CHILDREN. THEY ARE NOT FOR SALE OR COMMERCIAL DISTRIBUTION. THEY MAY BE STUDIED AT CPHC ON-SITE WITH ASSISTANCE OF OUR STAFF BY QUALIFIED RESEARCHERS, CLINICIANS, SPECIAL EDUCATION TEACHERS, ADMINISTRATORS OF NONPROFIT CLINICAL ORGANIZATIONS AND SCHOOLS FOR CHILDREN, SCIENTISTS AND STUDENTS OF RELEVANT DISCIPLINES BY APPOINTMENT AT CPTC HEADQUARTERS. CREDENTIALS, REFERENCES AND CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT ARE REQUIRED COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH ARRANGEMENTS CAN BE CONTRACTED FOR WITH CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENTS AND LONG TERM USE OF THE TAPES.
+
+- \*1. Childhood Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (California Pacific Hospital Grand Rounds), 1992 New Theory of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder,Gilbert Kliman, M.D. December 4'<sup>h</sup> 1992, International Association of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, Fairmont Hotel, San Francisco. •3. Severe Psychological Trauma in very Young Children, March 23d <sup>1993</sup> \*4. Post Traumatic Stress Disorder: Child & Adult, September 27th <sup>1993</sup>
+- 5. Cost Effectiveness: Mental Health Services for Children,September 28th <sup>1993</sup>
+- 6. Preventive Child Psychiatry Mc Aulev St Mary's October 16th 1993, •7. New Theory of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, for Int. Association of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry July 20 <sup>1994</sup> \*8. Cornerstone Method Conference. Wells Fargo. January 30th <sup>1996</sup> \*9. Cornerstone Conference: Control - Mastery Group, San Francisco Psychoanalytic Institute. February 9'' 1996
+
+- 10. Conference on Childhood of Adolf Hitler. Control-Mastery Group, San Francisco Psychoanalytic Institute, May 17 <sup>1996</sup>
+- 11. Orientation to the Personal Life History Book Method. CPTC & ACT For Mental Health, April 4<sup>6</sup> <sup>1997</sup>(two tapes) •12. The Cornerstone Method: A Public Health Approach. National Association for Social Work and Psychoanalysis,Seattle. September 26'1997 •13. New Theory of Psychological Trauma: Colloquium. San Francisco Psychoanalytic Institute,October 12`<sup>h</sup> <sup>1996</sup> \*14. Treatment of Severely Disturbed Preschoolers in their Public School Special Education Classrooms: A New Application of Intensive Psychotherapy. American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. \*15. Treatment of an Autistic Boy. the Cornerstone Method \*16. The Cornerstone Therapeutic Nursery Method \*17. The Cornerstone Method: Unique Features
+- 18. Investing in our Futures: Rotgry Club: About the Cornerstone Method, December 9i6 <sup>1997</sup>Robert Denebehn, Esq. With Gilbert Kliman, M.D.
+- 19. Salavation Army Cornerstone Program: Channel 4 News. Linda Reporter.
+- 20. Gilbert Kliman M.D. on Channel 4 News, April 22d 1998. LindaIt Reporter.
+- 21. Orientation to The Personal Life History Book October 13<sup>6</sup> <sup>1998</sup>(three tapes) \*22. The Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy of aFour Year Old Boy, 1999. An ongoing archive made with generous permission of the child's family, now totaling over 25 hours. This child has had severe stressors in his life, and suffers behavioral and overanxious symptoms. He has impulse dyscontrol, attentional deficits, and expressive language difficulties from which he can be seen to be recovering. Two excerpted tapes have been created to illustrate features of the child's pathology, and of the response to interpretive aspects of treatment. Gilbert Kliman, M.D. is the psychoanalyst, and the treatment is conducted three times aweek, with parent guidance every two weeks. The videographer is in the room. This may be the only existing video archive of achild analysis conducted by a certified child psychoanalyst. \*23. Cornerstone Treatment Archives: 1995-2008. Ongoing archive of intensive in-classroom treatment of seriously disturbed preschoolers, within their public special education classrooms in San Francisco and San Mateo, Shelters for homeless families in San
+
+Francisco and Seattle, private therapeutic preschool in San Francisco, and Cornerstone Argentina
+
+- 24. Thirty four year follow-up of aCornerstone Treated autistic child, now recovered. Presented at The San Francisco Psychoanalytic Institute, Child Analysis Study Group, 2001. Permission for public viewing granted by the patient. Excerpts may be viewed on www.childrenspsycholocical.org or the entire video obtained from <sup>g</sup>ilbertldiman2008@gmail.com
+
+•25 Orientation of the Family Services Center of County. Four days in December, 2007, in Seattle. Six DVD's.
+
+# Scientific and Educational Video Archives under Dr. Kliman's supervision:
+
+With parental permission, The Children's Psychological Health Center, under Dr. Kliman's leadership, is collecting unedited treatment documents of aspecial method of treatment in areal life space, called "The Cornerstone therapeutic preschool method." Now totaling over 200 video archive hours, eight different California therapists working with various educator teams have recorded their Cornerstone therapeutic preschool method work. Beginning in 1995, this archive started with Gilbert Kliman, M.D. working for <sup>a</sup>year as daily in-classroom therapist in apublic special education school. He was assisted by Leanne Runyan and Gail as the teachers at the San Mateo Early Childhood Education Center, a preschool specialeducation facility of The County of San Mateo. A second team under his supervision included work at The San Francisco Unified School District (Vanessa Vigilante and Esther ICronenberg). Third and fourth teams were at The Salvation Army Gateway Shelter (Vanessa Vigilante as therapist and Lynda Byrd as teacher, Deanna Reardon as therapist and Lynda Byrd as teacher). A fourth was at The Cadence Cornerstone Site at Mt. Pleasant School, San Jose (ICarita Hummer, therapist and Kathy Krall, teacher). Fifth team therapy was provided by Jane Christmas. The sixth team therapists was Dr. Miquela Hope, the seventh Molly Franklin, MFT. All have been extensively videotaped carrying out the method. An eighth team was assembled in late 2002, when Linda Hirshfeld Ph.D. joined as Fellow in Cornerstone Therapy. In 2001 Mike McDonald, Ed.D. became Special Education Director of Cornerstone School. All the treatments are have been under principal supervision of Dr. Kliman with additional supervision by Mali M, M.D., Myrna Frankel, Ed.D., and Jan Baeuerlen, M.D. Linda Hirshfeld, Ph.D. of the Ann Center is conducting the archival work for her Cornerstone Services.
+
+<sup>A</sup>professional researcher/ training confidentiality agreement is required to study this archive.
+
+SAOK Private Forensic 7-I3.04\CV\PPA CV5 \ Gilbert Kliman CV ppa 06 02 08.doc
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740041/EFTA02740041.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740041/EFTA02740041.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..80e7c09b420342534d1113b6cbcddd7ce9ca48a1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740041/EFTA02740041.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,1368 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740041.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 23,
+  "chars": 64748,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 17.29,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "PROFESSIONAL POSITIONS:",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            82.755,
+            83.53299999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            245.2,
+            83.53299999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            245.2,
+            95.698
+          ],
+          [
+            82.755,
+            95.698
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "GRANTS AWARDED:",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            81.529,
+            388.469
+          ],
+          [
+            200.451,
+            388.469
+          ],
+          [
+            200.451,
+            400.634
+          ],
+          [
+            81.529,
+            400.634
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "JANUSZ KORCZAK INTERNATIONAL LITERARY PRIZE:",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            82.142,
+            575.81
+          ],
+          [
+            402.38824462890625,
+            575.81
+          ],
+          [
+            402.38824462890625,
+            590.8170471191406
+          ],
+          [
+            82.142,
+            590.8170471191406
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "PUBLISHED PAPERS AND BOOKS:",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            80.916,
+            697.4599999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            276.58990478515625,
+            697.4599999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            276.58990478515625,
+            712.3170394897461
+          ],
+          [
+            80.916,
+            712.3170394897461
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "WORKS IN PROGRESS: available in Draft:",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            81.529,
+            150.846
+          ],
+          [
+            304.66099999999994,
+            150.846
+          ],
+          [
+            304.66099999999994,
+            163.822
+          ],
+          [
+            81.529,
+            163.822
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "PRESENTATIONS:",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            81.529,
+            323.589
+          ],
+          [
+            185.73899999999998,
+            323.589
+          ],
+          [
+            185.73899999999998,
+            336.56499999999994
+          ],
+          [
+            81.529,
+            336.56499999999994
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "2001-2002 Attack on America Events: 2001-2002 Public Health/ Public Education Activities:",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 11,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            106.66199999999998,
+            223.83600000000004
+          ],
+          [
+            494.69100000000003,
+            223.83600000000004
+          ],
+          [
+            494.69100000000003,
+            251.41
+          ],
+          [
+            106.66199999999998,
+            251.41
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CURRENT TEACHING:",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 13,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            82.0999984741211,
+            175.176
+          ],
+          [
+            212.71099999999996,
+            175.176
+          ],
+          [
+            212.71099999999996,
+            190.343017578125
+          ],
+          [
+            82.0999984741211,
+            190.343017578125
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "THESIS CHAIR ACTIVITIES:",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 13,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            81.52999877929688,
+            283.84999999999997
+          ],
+          [
+            243.4242401123047,
+            283.84999999999997
+          ],
+          [
+            243.4242401123047,
+            299.4629821777344
+          ],
+          [
+            81.52999877929688,
+            299.4629821777344
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "RECENT AND CURRENT PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION COMMITTEE WORK:",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 13,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            80.303,
+            485.789
+          ],
+          [
+            519.0315551757812,
+            485.789
+          ],
+          [
+            519.0315551757812,
+            501.593017578125
+          ],
+          [
+            80.303,
+            501.593017578125
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CURRENT:",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 13,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            80.303,
+            592.03
+          ],
+          [
+            141.21327209472656,
+            592.03
+          ],
+          [
+            141.21327209472656,
+            607.7230224609375
+          ],
+          [
+            80.303,
+            607.7230224609375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "PROFESSIONAL COMMENDATIONS:",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 14,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            84.59400000000001,
+            145.16899999999998
+          ],
+          [
+            296.1822509765625,
+            145.16899999999998
+          ],
+          [
+            296.1822509765625,
+            159.61126708984375
+          ],
+          [
+            84.59400000000001,
+            159.61126708984375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "MAJOR FEDERAL COURT FORENSIC ACTIVITIES:",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 15,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            84.59400000000001,
+            250.599
+          ],
+          [
+            373.22772216796875,
+            250.599
+          ],
+          [
+            373.22772216796875,
+            267.2703857421875
+          ],
+          [
+            84.59400000000001,
+            267.2703857421875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "EVALUATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS HEARD IN FEDERAL COURT, HANNIBAL \nMISSOURI, November 15, 2001",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 15,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            84.59400000000001,
+            277.362
+          ],
+          [
+            540.66845703125,
+            277.362
+          ],
+          [
+            540.66845703125,
+            307.0113525390625
+          ],
+          [
+            84.59400000000001,
+            307.0113525390625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "MAJOR STATE COURT CASES:",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 15,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            82.142,
+            477.679
+          ],
+          [
+            259.4647216796875,
+            477.679
+          ],
+          [
+            259.4647216796875,
+            493.0275573730469
+          ],
+          [
+            82.142,
+            493.0275573730469
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Some cases of public health significance. concerning allegedly traumatized minors in care of \ngovernmental or institutional agencies:",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 15,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            82.142,
+            503.63100000000003
+          ],
+          [
+            517.1824340820312,
+            503.63100000000003
+          ],
+          [
+            517.1824340820312,
+            535.0115966796875
+          ],
+          [
+            82.142,
+            535.0115966796875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CHILD PSYCHIATRIC EXPERT TESTIMONY:",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 16,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            84.59400000000001,
+            278.173
+          ],
+          [
+            337.58734130859375,
+            278.173
+          ],
+          [
+            337.58734130859375,
+            294.28173828125
+          ],
+          [
+            84.59400000000001,
+            294.28173828125
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "OTHER PUBLIC HEALTH ACTIVITIES AND RECOGNITION:",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 17,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            86.43299999999999,
+            121.65
+          ],
+          [
+            425.71441650390625,
+            121.65
+          ],
+          [
+            425.71441650390625,
+            141.681396484375
+          ],
+          [
+            86.43299999999999,
+            141.681396484375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Archive of Videotaped \nSeminars and Events:",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 18,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            203.51600000000002,
+            123.27199999999998
+          ],
+          [
+            425.4072265625,
+            123.27199999999998
+          ],
+          [
+            425.4072265625,
+            173.65069580078125
+          ],
+          [
+            203.51600000000002,
+            173.65069580078125
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION TAPES:",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 18,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            82.142,
+            312.235
+          ],
+          [
+            324.5430603027344,
+            312.235
+          ],
+          [
+            324.5430603027344,
+            328.2783508300781
+          ],
+          [
+            82.142,
+            328.2783508300781
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "The Children's Psychological Health Center \nArchive of Videotaped Seminars and Events:",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 20,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            118.309,
+            95.698
+          ],
+          [
+            534.536,
+            95.698
+          ],
+          [
+            534.536,
+            158.145
+          ],
+          [
+            118.309,
+            158.145
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CLINICAL AND SCIENTIFIC TAPES:",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 20,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            83.36800000000001,
+            226.26900000000003
+          ],
+          [
+            286.88399999999996,
+            226.26900000000003
+          ],
+          [
+            286.88399999999996,
+            241.67799999999997
+          ],
+          [
+            83.36800000000001,
+            241.67799999999997
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Scientific and Educational Video Archives under Dr. Kliman's supervision:",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 22,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            82.142,
+            251.41
+          ],
+          [
+            460.943115234375,
+            251.41
+          ],
+          [
+            460.943115234375,
+            271.3004150390625
+          ],
+          [
+            82.142,
+            271.3004150390625
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            87
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            42
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            9
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            69
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            34
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            15
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 9,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 10,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            524
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            54
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            20
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 11,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            9
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 12,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            538
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            50
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            23
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 13,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            66
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            34
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 14,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            487
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            40
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 15,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            448
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            40
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            11
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 16,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            504
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            30
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 17,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            427
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            20
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            9
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 18,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            374
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            36
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            15
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 19,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            91
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 20,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            298
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            32
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 21,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            388
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            18
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 22,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            449
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            33
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02740041"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740064/EFTA02740064.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740064/EFTA02740064.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3ba1699d489f6caf0179c0c70c3747086ba79e29
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740064/EFTA02740064.md
@@ -0,0 +1,223 @@
+# UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MAMA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 4, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 5, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80381-MARR.A
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 6, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80994-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 7, CASE NO.: 08- CV-80993-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant.
+
+C.M.A., CASE NO.: 08- CV-8081 I -MARRA/
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE, CASE NO.: 08- CV-80893-MARRA,
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN, et al., Defendant.
+
+DOE II, CASE NO.: 08-CV- 80469-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN et al.,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 101, CASE NO.: 08- CV-80591-MARRa
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 102, CASE NO.: 08- CV-80656-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+### PLAINTIFFS JANE DOES 2-7'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL AND/OR IDENTIFY PLAINTIFFS IN THE STYLE OF THIS CASE AND MOTION TO IDENTIFY JANE DOE IN THIRD-PARTY SUBPOENAS FOR PURPOSES OF DISCOVERY, OR ALTERNATIVELY, MOTION TO DISMISS "SUA SPONTE", WITH INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW
+
+Plaintiffs, JANE DOES 2-7, hereby serve their Response to Defendant's Motion to Compel and/or Identify Plaintiffs in the Style of this Case and Motion to Identify Jane Doe in Third-Party Subpoenas for Purposes of Discovery, or Alternatively, Motion to Dismiss "Sua Sponte", With Incorporated Memorandum of Law, and state as follows:
+
+- 1. The lawsuits filed by JANE DOES 2-7 involve private, intimate facts pertaining to their own childhood sexual abuse and exploitation by Defendant Jeffrey Epstein.
+
+2. Jane Does 2-7 filed their suits under a pseudonym' to prevent public disclosure of the private, highly sensitive and intimate facts pertaining to their sexual assaults, and the public association of their identities with Defendant Epstein and these assaults.
+
+3. Dr. Gilbert Kliman,' a well-known forensic psychiatrist with an expertise in the field of child trauma, has met with and evaluated each of Jane Does 2-7 and opined that public disclosure of their real names would create a substantial risk to them of further psychological harm. See Exhibit "A", Declaration of Gilbert Kliman, M.D.
+
+4. Dr. Kliman opines as follows:
+
+Releasing names of the plaintiffs to the public will reenact experiences of powerlessness and helplessness in the face of a boundary violation. Repetition and reenactment represent central features of Criterion B in the DSM-IV-TR diagnosis of posttraumatic stress disorder trauma. In effect, release of their identity and public intrusion into their personal life represents a reenactment of the shame of sexual traumatization. Repetition and reenactment are central pathologies that afflict sexual trauma survivors.
+
+Victims of sexual abuse often rely upon some form of dissociation, splitting or denial, as a defensive means to manage overwhelming affects associated with the sexual trauma. Each of the plaintiff girls has employed some variation of this defense, both during the massages and then subsequently following disclosure of the abuse. Primitive, maladaptive responses of this nature will become additionally reinforced as a result of public disclosure.
+
+Another aspect of the plaintiffs' experience, which is recognized by DSM-IV-TR, is that the trauma was associated with human design factors (such as cruel intention to do harm, rape, torture). Trauma of this origin has a tendency to produce more "severe or long lasting" posttraumatic stress disorder than natural events (DSM IV TR p. 464). A policy of deliberate revelation of the names of the victims would reinforce the sense of design, pattern and policy of human intentions.
+
+It is my opinion, with a reasonably high degree of medical certainty that the defense motion to allow public disclosure of the plaintiffs' identity is clinically
+
+<sup>1</sup> Defendant and his counsel are aware of the real names of Jane Does 2-7.
+
+<sup>2</sup> A copy of the curriculum vitae of Dr. Gilbert Kliman is attached hereto as Exhibit "B".
+
+and ethically a wrongful plan. The act of revealing their identity against their wishes places the plaintiffs at risk, in the best of circumstances, of suffering an aggravation of existing diagnostic concerns. It is more probable than not that releasing personal identities will an exacerbation and magnification of symptoms lending to increased risk of revictimization and retraumatization.
+
+Exhibit "A", in 13-15, 21
+
+5. Given the private nature of the allegations in this lawsuit and the serious risk of harm to the mental health of Jane Does 2-7 if a public disclosure of their identities were required, Jane Does 2-7 should be permitted to continue using a pseudonym in this lawsuit.
+
+6. Notably, in one of the cases consolidated for purposes of discovery, Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 08-80893, this Court recognized the harm likely to result from public disclosure of the victims' identities in these cases, and allowed the Plaintiff in that case to "proceed in this action under the pseudonym 'Jane Doe' ", by Order dated October 6, 2008.
+
+7. Jeffrey Epstein sets forth no facts to support his bare contention that Jane Does 2- 7 use of a pseudonym in these proceedings interferes with his "constitutional due process right." Sste Motion to Compel, p. 3. Defendant and his counsel know the identities of these Plaintiffs.
+
+8. Defendant also requests the Court's permission to use the real names of Jane Does 2-7 in various third-party subpoenas for discovery purposes. Defendant does not identify any of the entities or persons to whom he intends to send subpoenas. An order granting the relief requested without limitations would essentially nullify Jane Does 2-7's right to proceed anonymously. Jane Does 2-7 therefore object to the issuance of third-party subpoenas, and submit that Defendant can obtain the discovery he seeks by alternative means that will preserve the confidentiality of the Jane Does 2-7's identities.
+
+9. If this Court were to permit third party subpoenas or records custodian depositions using the existing captions and identifying Jane Does 2-7 in the body of the subpoena by their names, due to publicity surrounding the Defendant's crimes, then Jane Does 2- 7 would effectively be revealed as abuse victims in these cases against Defendant Epstein. Any subpoenas or notices to third parties therefore should not disclose the type of action or the Defendant's identity. There are alternatives which would preserve Jane Does 2-7's anonymity and be more efficient and cost-effective at the same time. For instance, Defendant can obtain records from various non-party sources through Plaintiffs' counsel, who can certify that they have obtained the records through authorizations signed by Jane Does 2-7. Another means to obtain non-party records concerning Plaintiffs is the appointment of a special =, who would verify authenticity and completeness of the records.
+
+10. Finally, Jeffrey Epstein's request that this Court order a "sua sponte" dismissal is illogical. Sua spank means "hvlithout prompting or suggestion; on its own motion." Black's Law Dictionary 1437 (7th ed.1999). Thus, the definition of sua sponte does not fit these circumstances, because the Court is being prompted by Epstein's Motion. Velchez v. Carnival Corp" 331 F.3d 1207 (11th Cir. 2003). In any event, there is no basis or authority to support a dismissal of these cases.
+
+WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs Jane Does 2-7 respectfully request that (i) this Court deny Defendant's Motion to Compel and/or Identify Plaintiffs in the Style of this Case and Motion to Identify Jane Doe in Third-Party Subpoenas for Purposes of Discovery, or Alternatively, Motion to Dismiss "Sua Sponte", in its entirety; (ii) Plaintiffs Jane Does 2-7 be permitted to continue using their pseudonyms in this litigation; (iii) this Court order that records from non-parties relating to Jane Does 2-7, including medical and employment records, only be obtained through Plaintiffs' counsel by means of signed authorizations that do not include the caption or identify Epstein as the party seeking records, or alternatively, appoint a special to obtain the records, who would verify authenticity and completeness of the records; and (iv) all other relief this Court deems just and appropriate.
+
+# MEMORANDUM OF LAW
+
+#### 1. PLAINTIFFS JANE DOES 2-7 SHOULD BE PERMITTED TO PROCEED ANONYMOUSLY IN THIS CASE DUE TO THE SENSITIVE, PRIVATE NATURE OF THE UNDERLYING FACTS AND THE RISK OF PSYCHOLOGICAL HARM TO THE PLAINTIFFS
+
+Federal courts permit a party to proceed under a pseudonym when special circumstances warrant anonymity. See, e.g., Roe v. Aware Woman Ctr. for Choice, Inc., 253 F.3d 678, 685-87 (11th Cir.2001); Does I thru XXIII v. Advanced Textile Corp., 214 F.3d 1058, 1068-69 (9th Cir.2000); James v. Jacobson, 6 F.3d 233, 238-39 (4th Cir.1993); EW v. New York Blood Center, 213 F.R.D. 108, 110-12 (E.D.N.Y.2003); Javier v. =-Botello, 211 F.R.D. 194, 196 (W.D.N.Y.2002); Doe v. 105 F.Supp.2d 40, 43.44 (E.D.N.Y.1999); Doe v. United Servs. Life Ins. Co., 123 F.R.D. 437, 439 (S.D.N.Y. 1988). Sexual assault victims are a paradigmatic example of those entitled to a grant of anonymity. See Doe No. 2 v. Kolko, 242 F.R.D. 193 (ED. N.Y. 2006); Doe v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield United of Wisc., 112 F.3d 869, 872 (7th Cir.1997) ("fictitious names are allowed when necessary to protect the privacy of ... rape victims, and other particularly vulnerable parties or witnesses"); see also Doe v. City of Chicago, 360 F.3d 667, 669 (7th Cir. 2004).
+
+The decision whether to allow a plaintiff to proceed anonymously is within the court's discretion. See Aware Woman Or., 253 F.3d at 684; Javier, 211 F.R.D. at 195; EW, 213 F.R.D. at 110. As set forth above, this Court exercised its direction in one of the consolidated cases, Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, Case No. 08-80893, to allow a plaintiff to proceed under the pseudonym "Jane Doe" in an Order dated October 6, 2008.
+
+Courts will permit a party to proceed under a pseudonym where "the party's need for anonymity outweighs prejudice to the opposing party and the public's interest in knowing the party's identity." Does I Thru XXIII, 214 F.3d at 1068; see Javier, 211 F.R.D. at 195; EW, 213 F.R.D. at 111; As set forth herein, the balancing test in this case weighs in favor of permitted plaintiff to continue to proceed anonymously:
+
+> In undertaking this balance, courts have considered such facts as (1) whether the plaintiff is suing the government or a private person; (2) whether the plaintiff would be compelled to disclose intimate information; (3) whether plaintiff would be compelled to his or her intention in engage in illegal conduct, thereby risking criminal prosecution; (4) whether the plaintiff would risk injury if identified; (5) whether the party defending against a suit brought under a pseudonym would thereby be prejudiced; (6) the ages of the parties whose identity is to be suppressed; (7) the extent to which the identity of the litigant has been kept confidential; (8) whether, because of the purely legal nature of the issues presented or otherwise, there is an atypically weak public interest in knowing the litigants' identities; and (9) the public interest in guaranteeing open access to proceedings without denying litigants access to the justice system.
+
+Doe v. Del Rio 241 F.R.D. 154, 157 (S.D. N.Y. 2006)
+
+The public has a strong interest in protecting the identities of sexual assault victims so that other victims will not be deterred from reporting such crimes. See Doe v. , 202 F.R.D. 173, 176 (E.D.Pa.2001) (granting anonymity to sexual assault victim); Doe No. 2 v. Kolko, 242 F.R.D. 193 (E.D. N.Y. 2006). That is particularly true in these consolidated cases where there are numerous victims with similar claims. Although these cases have gained considerable media attention, there appears to be little public interest in knowing the specific identity of each of the victims.
+
+With regard to the second factor, courts have granted anonymity to protect against disclosure of a wide range of issues involving matters of the utmost intimacy, including sexual assault. See, e.g., Aware Woman Ctr., 253 F.3d at 685 (abortion); EW, 213 F.R.D. at II I (infection with hepatitis B); Doe v. 202 F.R.D. 173, 176 (E.D.Pa.2001) (sexual assault victim); M, 105 F.Supp.2d at 42 (sexual assault victim); WGA v. Priority Pharmacy, Inc., 184 F.R.D. 616, 617 (E.D.Mo.1999) (status as AIDS patient); Doe v. United Servs. Life Ins. Co., 123 F.R.D. 437, 439 (S.D.N.Y.1988) (sexual orientation); see also Blue Cross, 112 F.3d at 872 (recognizing rape victims as entitled to anonymity). It cannot be reasonably denied that a person's sexual history — especially during their childhood — is an intimate fact. When the childhood sexual history includes criminal sexual contact by an adult, the facts are even more intimate and personal. In the electronic age in which we live, these concerns are heightened. As federal courts have recognized in this context, it is now possible to "determine whether a given individual is a party to a lawsuit in federal court anywhere in the country by the simplest of computer searches, to access the docket sheet of any such case electronically, and ... that entire case files will be accessible over the Internet." Doe v. City of New York, 201 F.R.D. 100, 102 (S.D.N.Y.2001) (denying anonymity where any injury was purely reputational and case did not involve private or intimate matter); see EW, 213 F.R.D. at 112-13.
+
+As Dr. Kliman explains in his Declaration, disclosure of Jane Does 2-7's identities will place these Plaintiffs "at-risk of having their personal lives scrutinized by friends, extended family, spouses, children, fellow students, employers and fellow employees, the media and general public. This type of exposure humiliates many victims and represents another betrayal of trust. Public exposure places the plaintiffs at further risk of stigmatization, shame and retraumatization." See Exhibit "A" at 1 3. Dr. Kliman also finds it of no consequence that some of the plaintiffs are now legally adults in that "Niue to traumatization the plaintiffs are arrested in their development, and even those who are now legally adult are arrested in part to adolescent
+
+aspects of psychology." Id. at 1 4
+
+The policy of protecting victims of sexual misconduct from undue embarrassment and disclosure of their private affairs is firmly established in Fed.R.Evid. 412. The protections of Rule 412 are designed to "encourage victims of sexual misconduct to institute and participate in legal proceedings against alleged offenders." (Committee Notes to 1994 Amendment). Likewise, many states in this country, including Florida and New York, have similarly enacted laws to protect the anonymity of sexual assault victims. See Fla. Stat. §§794.024, 794.026 (2008); N.Y. Civil Rights Law § 50-b (McKinney 2009). In 1994, the Florida Legislature passed The Crime Victims Protections Act. The legislative stated purpose for the Act was "to protect the identity of victims of sexual crimes." Fla. AGO, 2003-56, 2003 WL 22971082 (Dec. 15, 2003). Under §794.024, Florida Statutes, court records that identify the name and/or address of a victim of a sexual crime are presumed to be confidential and exempt from public access. Id. Similarly, upon approving New York's rape shield law, then Governor Mario stated, "sexual assault victims have unfortunately had to endure a terrible invasion of their physical privacy. They have a right to expect that this violation will not be compounded by a further invasion of their privacy." 1991 McKinney's Sessions Laws of N.Y., at 2211-2212 (quoted in Deborah S. v. Diorio, 153 Misc.2d 708, 583 N.Y.S.2d 872 (N.Y.Ciry Civ.Ct.1992)); see also Coker v. Georgia, 433 U.S. 584, 597, 97 S.Ct. 2861, 53 L.Ed.2d 982 (1977) ("Short of homicide, [rape] is the ultimate violation of self').
+
+As to the fourth factor of risk injury, Dr. Kliman has evaluated Jane Does 2-7, and has concluded that the childhood sexual abuse at issue has caused features of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), including shame, guilt, helplessness, and powerlessness. See Exhibit "A" at III 4-7. Dr. Kliman further states, "it is more probable than not that releasing personal identities will an exacerbation and magnification of symptoms lending to increased risk of revictimization and retraumatization." Id. at 1 21. Thus, this is not a case analogous to those cited by defendant in which the plaintiffs were merely at risk of "personal embarrassment." Instead, there is a genuine and immediate risk of psychological harm.
+
+None of the cases cited by Defendant where courts denied a plaintiff's request for anonymity involved victims of childhood sexual assault or evidence of emotional or psychological harm that would result from disclosure of the plaintiff's identity. See Doe v. Hartz, 52 F.Supp.2d 1027 (N.D.Iowa 1999); Doe v. Shakur, 164 F.R.D. 359 (E.D.N.Y.1996); Doe v. Bell Atlantic Bus. Sys. Servs., 162 F.R.D. 418 (D.Mass.1995); Doe v. Univ. of Rhode Island, 28 Fed.R.Serv.3d 366, 1993 WL 667341 (D.R.I. Dec. 28, 1993).
+
+As to the factor of prejudice, the Defendant does not identify how his ability to conduct discovery or impeach Jane Does 2-7's credibility has been or will be impaired if these Plaintiffs are permitted to proceed under a pseudonym. See EW, 213 F.R.D. at 112, 105 F.Supp.2d at 44-45. Other than the need to make redactions and take measures not to disclose these Plaintiffs' identities, Defendant will not be hampered or inconvenienced merely by Plaintiffs' anonymity in court papers. As set forth above, Defendant already knows their true identities. See Aware Woman Center, 253 F.3d at 687 (no prejudice where plaintiff offered to disclose her name to defendant); EW, 213 F.R.D. at 112; , 105 F.Supp.2d at 44-45.
+
+# II. DEFENDANT SHOULD NOT BE PERMITTED TO USE THE REAL NAMES OF JANE DOES 2-7 IN THIRD-PARTY SUBPEONAS EXCEPT FOR THOSE ISSUED TO PERSONS WHOM PLAINTIFFS HAVE ALREADY DISCLOSED THEIR SEXUAL ABUSE
+
+As for the use of Jane Does 2-7's real names in subpoenas issued to non-parties, a party may obtain discovery of any non-privileged matter that is relevant to a claim or defense of any party. Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(b)(1). However, a district court may limit discovery "for good cause shown" by making "any order which justice requires to protect a party or person from annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden or expense," including that the discovery not be had or that it be had only by a method other than that selected by the party seeking discovery. Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(c). Jane Does 2-7 have articulated a specific and substantial harm from disclosure of their identities.
+
+If this Court were to permit Defendant to issue third-party subpoenas containing Jane Doe 2-7's real names, the identity of the Defendant, and/or facts pertaining to the nature of the case to whomever Defendant wants, it would be akin to requiring these Plaintiffs to use their real name in the pleadings. Instead, Jane Does 2-7 propose to voluntarily execute authorizations (which would not contain the case names or the identity of the Defendant) to allow Defendant to obtain education, employment, and medical records to be used for purposes of this litigation only.<sup>3</sup>Alternatively, Defendant can obtain the records through a special who would verify authenticity and completeness of the records. Either of these approaches would not only place Jane Does 2-7 at less risk of psychological harm, but would also be more cost-effective and efficient.
+
+# CONCLUSION
+
+Based on the foregoing, Plaintiffs Jane Does 2-7 respectfully request that Defendant's Motion to Compel and/or Identify Plaintiffs in the Style of this Case and Motion to Identify Jane Doe in Third-Party Subpoenas for Purposes of Discovery, or Alternatively. Motion to Dismiss "Sua Sponte" be denied in its entirety, and that Plaintiffs Jane Does 2-7 be permitted to continue using their pseudonyms in this litigation. Additionally, to avoid public disclosure of the Plaintiffs identities in non-party records discovery, Plaintiffs Jane Does 2-7 request that such
+
+<sup>3</sup> Defendant and Plaintiff have previously agreed that education records can be obtained in this
+
+discovery be obtained either through Plaintiffs' counsel by means of written authorizations, or by the appointment of a special
+
+Dated: June 8, 2009
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+By: s/ Adam D. Horowitz Stuart S. Mermelstein (FL Bar No. 947245) ssm@sexabuseattomey.com Adam D. Horowitz (FL Bar No. 376980) ahorowitz@sexabuseattomey.com MERMELSTEIN & HOROWITZ, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiffs Jane Doe Nos. 2-7 18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160 Tel: (305) 931-2200 Fax: (305) 931-0877
+
+### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
+
+I hereby certify that on June 8, 2009, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day to all parties on the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those parties who are not authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing.
+
+/s/ Adam D. Horowitz
+
+## SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq.
+
+igoldberger@agwpa.com
+
+Robert D. Critton, Esq.
+
+rcritton@bc1claw.com
+
+James
+
+bedwards@rra-law.com
+
+Isidro Manuel
+
+isidrogarcia@bellsouth.net
+
+Jack U
+
+irth@searcylaw.com
+
+Katherine Warthen Ezell
+
+KEzell@podhurst.com
+
+Michael James Pike
+
+MPike@bciclaw.com
+
+Paul G. Cassell
+
+cassellp@law.utah.edu
+
+Richard Horace Willits
+
+lawyerwillits@aol.com
+
+Robert C. Josefsberg
+
+rjosefsberg@podhurst.com
+
+/s/ Adam D. Horowitz
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740064/EFTA02740064.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740064/EFTA02740064.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f1e86914e85df7901262da3ca523cb6faa349670
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740064/EFTA02740064.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,763 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740064.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 15,
+  "chars": 22127,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 2.28,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            405.95098876953125,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            405.95098876953125,
+            100.10302734375
+          ],
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            100.10302734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "PLAINTIFFS JANE DOES 2-7'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO \nCOMPEL AND/OR IDENTIFY PLAINTIFFS IN THE STYLE OF THIS CASE AND \nMOTION TO IDENTIFY JANE DOE IN THIRD-PARTY SUBPOENAS FOR \nPURPOSES OF DISCOVERY, OR ALTERNATIVELY, MOTION TO DISMISS \n\"SUA SPONTE\", WITH INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            82.62,
+            429.29999999999995
+          ],
+          [
+            529.992,
+            429.29999999999995
+          ],
+          [
+            529.992,
+            500.2330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            82.62,
+            500.2330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "MEMORANDUM OF LAW",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            238.68,
+            126.35999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            391.0112609863281,
+            126.35999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            391.0112609863281,
+            141.363037109375
+          ],
+          [
+            238.68,
+            141.363037109375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "1. PLAINTIFFS JANE DOES 2-7 SHOULD BE PERMITTED \nTO PROCEED ANONYMOUSLY IN THIS CASE DUE TO THE \nSENSITIVE, PRIVATE NATURE OF THE UNDERLYING FACTS \nAND THE RISK OF PSYCHOLOGICAL HARM TO THE PLAINTIFFS",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            129.744,
+            168.48
+          ],
+          [
+            517.8489990234375,
+            168.48
+          ],
+          [
+            517.8489990234375,
+            224.2330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            129.744,
+            224.2330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "II. DEFENDANT SHOULD NOT BE PERMITTED TO USE \nTHE REAL NAMES OF JANE DOES 2-7 IN THIRD-PARTY \nSUBPEONAS EXCEPT FOR THOSE ISSUED TO PERSONS WHOM \nPLAINTIFFS HAVE ALREADY DISCLOSED THEIR SEXUAL ABUSE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 10,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            133.72999572753906,
+            567.0
+          ],
+          [
+            516.9857177734375,
+            567.0
+          ],
+          [
+            516.9857177734375,
+            624.3630218505859
+          ],
+          [
+            133.72999572753906,
+            624.3630218505859
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CONCLUSION",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 11,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            263.15999999999997,
+            485.18999999999994
+          ],
+          [
+            349.43621826171875,
+            485.18999999999994
+          ],
+          [
+            349.43621826171875,
+            500.2330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            263.15999999999997,
+            500.2330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 13,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            223.38,
+            72.08999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            388.5423889160156,
+            72.08999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            388.5423889160156,
+            86.2330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            223.38,
+            86.2330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "SERVICE LIST \nDOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN \nUnited States District Court, Southern District of Florida",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 14,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            156.67200000000003,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            455.1346740722656,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            455.1346740722656,
+            113.9830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            156.67200000000003,
+            113.9830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            47
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            24
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            21
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            52
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            14
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            15
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            72
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            35
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            57
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            82
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            67
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            33
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 9,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 10,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            55
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 11,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            57
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 12,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            38
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            19
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 13,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            19
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 14,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            56
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            21
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02740064"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740079/EFTA02740079.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740079/EFTA02740079.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6b164b87f8bac65cbee77183e3cc6f1cbf9b7a82
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740079/EFTA02740079.md
@@ -0,0 +1,146 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 4, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 5, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80381-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 6, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80994-MARR
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 7,
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+C.M.A., CASE NO.: 08- CV-80811 -MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE, CASE NO.: 08- CV-80893-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN, et al.,
+
+Defendant.
+
+CASE NO.: 08- CV-80993-MARRA
+
+DOE II, CASE NO.: 08-CV- 80469-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN et al.,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 101, CASE NO.: 08- CV-80591-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 102, CASE NO.: 08- CV-80656-MARRA I
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## PLAINTIFFS JANE DOES' 2- 7 NOTICE OF JOINDER IN PLAINTIFFS' JANE DOES 101 AND 102'S MOTION FOR NO-CONTACT ORDER
+
+Plaintiffs Jane Does 2-7 join in Plaintiffs Jane Does 101 and 102's Motion for No-Contact Order, filed May 22, 2009, and state as follows:
+
+- I. Plaintiffs Jane Does 2-7 incorporate and adopt the facts set forth in the pending Motion for No-Contact Order. Additionally, Plaintiffs offer additional facts in support of the Motion for a No-Contact Order, as set forth below.
+- 2. Upon information and belief, Plaintiffs Jane Does 2-7 were all identified on the victims list provided to Defendant Epstein's counsel in connection with the Non-prosecution Agreement, and each has been identified as victims to Defendant Epstein in their pending
+
+actions. In June 2008, Palm Beach Circuit Court Judge Pucillo ordered Defendant Epstein "not to have any contact, direct or indirect," with any of his victims. Judge Pucillo clarified that forbidden "indirect" contact included, but was not limited to, text messages, emails, telephone calls, or messages through third parties. As detailed herein, Jane Does 4 and 7 have been contacted on multiple occasions by at least one person representing that she is cooperating with and communicating on behalf of Defendant Epstein. In these contacts, the Plaintiffs/victims were threatened and harassed.
+
+3. As with other Plaintiffs, Jane Does 4 and 7 were first introduced to Defendant Epstein by Hayley , who was a high school friend. I
+
+4. had had contact with these Plaintiffs on several occasions in which she represented to Plaintiffs Jane Doe 4 and 7 that she is cooperating with Defendant Epstein's attorneys and that she is being financially supported by Defendant Epstein. Moreover, has told these Plaintiffs specifically that she is communicating on behalf of Defendant Epstein.
+
+5. During these contacts, made disparaging comments to the Plaintiffs and also sent disturbing text messages to Jane Doe No. 4. In one text, specifically stated, "I just met with my lawyer today and I'm finally done with the Epstein case. LOL. I knew you were suing Jeffrey all along and I've learned so much about you in the meantime. LOL." Jane Doe 4 understood this to mean that had exchanged private information about Jane Doe 4 with Defendant Epstein and his attorneys. Since February, 2009, Jane Doe 4 has continued to receive text messages from that are sometimes harassing and other times seek information about Jane Doe 4's private life, her lawsuit against Defendant Epstein, and/or her lawyer's strategy.
+
+was named in at least one civil case against Mr. Epstein as a co-defendant. See Jane Doe v. Epstein, case no. 50-2008-CA-0065996, Palm Beach County Circuit Court. ■ **brought multiple underage girls to Epstein in addition to Jane Does 4 and 7.** 
+
+6. On one occasion, approached Jane Doe 7 and disclosed that she was cooperating with Defendant Epstein's defense, and that she (M) agreed that she would testify against Jane Doe 7 and the other plaintiffs to make sure that none of the Plaintiffs ever received any money from Defendant Epstein, making clear that her testimony would not be truthful to achieve this end. She also made disparaging comments to Jane Doe 7, accusing her of ruining Defendant Epstein's reputation.
+
+7. The very possibility of any contact with Epstein or his agents, including M, causes anxiety and distress particularly to Jane Doe 4 and 7, as well as the other Plaintiffs. A nocontact order should prevent further harassment of the Plaintiffs by Epstein and his agents, including, but not limited to, Hayley
+
+WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs Jane Does 2-7, respectfully join Plaintiffs Jane Does 101 and 102 in moving this Court to enter an order granting Plaintiffs' Motion for a No Contact Order prohibiting the Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, from any contact or communication with Plaintiffs, either directly or indirectly, except through Plaintiffs' attorneys of record for the duration of the Order.
+
+Dated: June 8, 2009 Respectfully submitted,
+
+By: s/ Adam D. Horowitz Stuart S. Mermelstein (FL Bar No. 947245) ssm@sexabuseattorney.com Adam D. Horowitz (FL Bar No. 376980) ahorowitz@sexabuseattomey.com MERMELSTEIN & HOROWITZ, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiffs 18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160 Tel: (305) 931-2200 Fax: (305) 931-0877
+
+## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
+
+I HEREBY CERTIFY that on June 8, 2009, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day to all parties on the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those parties who are not authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing.
+
+/s/ Adam D. Horowitz
+
+## SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. inoldberger@agwpa.com
+
+Robert D. Critton, Esq. rcritton@bcIclaw.com
+
+James bedwards@rra-law.com
+
+Isidro Manuel isidrogarcia@bellsouth.net
+
+Jack iah@searcvlaw.com Katherine Warthen Ezell KEzell@podhurst.com
+
+Michael James Pike MPike@bciclaw.com
+
+Paul G. Cassell cassellp@law.utah.edu
+
+Richard Horace Willits lawyerwillits@aol.com
+
+Robert C. Josefsberg rjosefsberg@podhurst.com
+
+/s/ Adam D. Horowitz
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740079/EFTA02740079.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740079/EFTA02740079.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ad580d1be883d7623787bf948ad475e675b9bb3c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740079/EFTA02740079.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,383 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740079.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 7,
+  "chars": 6441,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.55,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            98.82
+          ],
+          [
+            406.3418273925781,
+            98.82
+          ],
+          [
+            406.3418273925781,
+            127.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            127.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "PLAINTIFFS JANE DOES' 2- 7 NOTICE OF JOINDER IN PLAINTIFFS' \nJANE DOES 101 AND 102'S MOTION FOR NO-CONTACT ORDER",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            107.71199999999999,
+            456.8399999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            505.2855224609375,
+            456.8399999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            505.2855224609375,
+            486.363037109375
+          ],
+          [
+            107.71199999999999,
+            486.363037109375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            227.052,
+            72.08999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            385.39947509765625,
+            72.08999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            385.39947509765625,
+            85.863037109375
+          ],
+          [
+            227.052,
+            85.863037109375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "SERVICE LIST \nDOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN \nUnited States District Court, Southern District of Florida",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            156.67200000000003,
+            70.47
+          ],
+          [
+            455.1346740722656,
+            70.47
+          ],
+          [
+            455.1346740722656,
+            113.9830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            156.67200000000003,
+            113.9830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            49
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            20
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            22
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            54
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            14
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            58
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            60
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            30
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            24
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            11
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02740079"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740086/EFTA02740086.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740086/EFTA02740086.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d0403ec0a8d9da76c523331e6ffc00a4a2ccb2e0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740086/EFTA02740086.md
@@ -0,0 +1,146 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+v.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S FIRST AMENDED ANSWER & AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
+
+Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, (hereinafter "EPSTEIN"), by and through his undersigned attorneys, files his First Amended Answer to the Second Amended Complaint [DE 50] and states:
+
+- 1. Without knowledge and deny.
+
+2. As to the allegations in paragraphs 2, Defendant asserts his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. See DeLisi v. Bankers Ins. Company, 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Malloy v. Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment - "[i]t would be incongruous to have different standards determine the validity of a claim of privilege based on the same feared prosecution, depending on whether the claim was asserted in state or federal court."); 5 Fed.Prac. & Proc. Civ. 3d §1280 Effect of Failure to Deny — Privilege Against Self-Incrimination ("...court must treat the defendant's claim of privilege as equivalent to a specific denial."). See also 24 FIa.Jur.2d Evidence §592. Defendants in civil actions. -
+
+EXHIBIT A
+
+"... a civil defendant who raises an affirmative defense is not precluded from asserting the privilege [against self-incrimination], because affirmative defenses do not constitute the kind of voluntary application for affirmative relief' which would prevent a plaintiff bringing a claim seeking affirmative relief from asserting the privilege.
+
+3. As to the allegations in paragraph 3, deny.
+
+4. As to the allegations in paragraph 4, deny.
+
+5. As to the allegations in paragraph 5, without knowledge and deny.
+
+6. As to the allegations in paragraphs 6, Defendant asserts his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. See DeLisi v. Bankers Ins. Company, 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Malloy v. Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment - "[i]t would be incongruous to have different standards determine the validity of a claim of privilege based on the same feared prosecution, depending on whether the claim was asserted in state or federal court."); 5 Fed.Prac. & Proc. Civ. 3d §1280 Effect of Failure to Deny — Privilege Against Self-Incrimination ("...court must treat the defendant's claim of privilege as equivalent to a specific denial?). See also 24 Fla.Jur.2d Evidence §592. Defendants in civil actions. — "... a civil defendant who raises an affirmative defense is not precluded from asserting the privilege [against self-incrimination], because affirmative defenses do not constitute the kind of voluntary application for affirmative relief' which would prevent a plaintiff bringing a claim seeking affirmative relief from asserting the privilege.
+
+7. As to the allegations in paragraphs 7 through 14 of Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint, Defendant exercises his Fifth Amendment Privilege against selfincrimination. See DeLisi v. Bankers Ins. Company, 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Malloy v. Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment - "[i]t would be incongruous to have different standards determine the validity of a claim of privilege based on the same feared prosecution, depending on whether the claim was asserted in state or federal court."); 5 Fed.Prac. & Proc. Civ. 3d §1280 Effect of Failure to Deny — Privilege Against Self-Incrimination ("...court must treat the defendant's claim of privilege as equivalent to a specific denial."). See also 24 Fla.Jur.2d Evidence §592. Defendants in civil actions. a civil defendant who raises an affirmative defense is not precluded from asserting the privilege [against self-incrimination], because affirmative defenses do not constitute the kind of voluntary application for affirmative relief" which would prevent a plaintiff bringing a claim seeking affirmative relief from asserting the privilege.
+
+8. In response to the allegations of paragraph 15, Defendant realleges and adopts his responses to paragraphs 1 through 14 of the Second Amended Complaint set forth in paragraphs 1 through 6 above herein.
+
+9. Defendant asserts the Fifth Amendment Privilege against self-incrimination to the allegations set forth in paragraphs 16 through 21 of the Second Amended Complaint. See DeLisi v. Bankers Ins. Company, 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Malloy v. Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination
+
+Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment - "lilt would be incongruous to have different standards determine the validity of a claim of privilege based on the same feared prosecution, depending on whether the claim was asserted in state or federal court."); 5 Fed.Prac. & Proc. Civ. 3d §1280 Effect of Failure to Deny - Privilege Against Self-Incrimination ("...court must treat the defendant's claim of privilege as equivalent to a specific denial."). See also 24 Fla.Jur.2d Evidence §592. Defendants in civil actions. —"... a civil defendant who raises an affirmative defense is not precluded from asserting the privilege [against selfincrimination], because affirmative defenses do not constitute the kind of voluntary application for affirmative relief" which would prevent a plaintiff bringing a claim seeking affirmative relief from asserting the privilege.
+
+10. In response to the allegations of paragraph 22, Defendant realleges and adopts his responses to paragraphs 1 through 14 of the Second Amended Complaint set forth in paragraphs 1 through 6 above herein.
+
+11. Defendant asserts the Fifth Amendment Privilege against self-incrimination to the allegations set forth in paragraphs 23 through 27 of the Second Amended Complaint. See DeLisi v. Bankers Ins. Compaq, 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Malloy v. Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment - "[i]t would be incongruous to have different standards determine the validity of a claim of privilege based on the same feared prosecution, depending on whether the claim was asserted in state or federal court."); 5 Fed.Prac. & Proc. Civ. 3d
+
+§1280 Effect of Failure to Deny — Privilege Against Self-Incrimination ("...court must treat the defendant's claim of privilege as equivalent to a specific denial."). See also 24 FIa.Jur.2d Evidence §592. Defendants in civil actions. —"... a civil defendant who raises an affirmative defense is not precluded from asserting the privilege [against selfincrimination], because affirmative defenses do not constitute the kind of voluntary application for affirmative relief" which would prevent a plaintiff bringing a claim seeking affirmative relief from asserting the privilege.
+
+12. In response to the allegations of paragraph 28, Defendant realleges and adopts his responses to paragraphs 1 through 14 of the Second Amended Complaint set forth in paragraphs 1 through 6 above herein.
+
+13. Defendant asserts the Fifth Amendment Privilege against self-incrimination to the allegations set forth in paragraphs 29 through 34 of the Second Amended Complaint. See DeLisi v. Bankers Ins. Company, 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Malloy v. Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment - "[i]t would be incongruous to have different standards determine the validity of a claim of privilege based on the same feared prosecution, depending on whether the claim was asserted in state or federal court."); 5 Fed.Prac. & Proc. Civ. 3d §1280 Effect of Failure to Deny — Privilege Against Self-Incrimination ("...court must treat the defendant's claim of privilege as equivalent to a specific denial."). See also 24 Fla.Jur.2d Evidence §592. Defendants in civil actions. —"... a civil defendant who raises an affirmative defense is not precluded from asserting the privilege [against self-
+
+incrimination], because affirmative defenses do not constitute the kind of voluntary application for affirmative relief' which would prevent a plaintiff bringing a claim seeking affirmative relief from asserting the privilege.
+
+WHEREFORE, Defendant requests that this Court deny the relief sought by Plaintiff.
+
+## Affirmative Defenses
+
+1. As to all counts, Plaintiff actually consented to and was a willing participant in the acts alleged, and therefore, her claims are barred, or her damages are required to be reduced accordingly.
+
+2. As to all counts alleged, Plaintiff actually consented to and participated in conduct similar and/or identical to the acts alleged with other persons which were the sole or contributing cause of Plaintiffs alleged damages.
+
+3. As to all counts, Plaintiff impliedly consented to the acts alleged by not objecting and by going to Defendant's home with other females and/or by bringing other females to Defendant's home for which Plaintiff received money, and therefore, her claims are barred, or her damages are required to be reduced accordingly.
+
+4. As to all counts, Defendant reasonably believed or was told that the Plaintiff had attained the age of 18 years old at the time of the alleged acts.
+
+5. As to all counts, Plaintiffs claims are barred as she said she was 18 years or older at the time.
+
+6. As to all counts, Plaintiffs alleged damages were caused in whole or part by events and/or circumstances completely unrelated to the incident(s) alleged in the complaint.
+
+7. Plaintiff's claims are barred by the applicable statute of limitations.
+
+8. As to Plaintiff's claims for punitive damages in Count I — "Sexual Assault & Battery," and Count II — "Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress," such claims are subject to the limitations as set forth in §768.72, et seq., Florida Statutes.
+
+9. As to Plaintiff's claims for punitive damages in Count I — "Sexual Assault & Battery," and Count II — "Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress," such claims are subject to the constitutional limitations and guideposts as set forth in BMW of North America v. Gore, 116 S.Ct 1589 (1996); Philip Morris USA v. M, 127 S.Ct. 1057 (2007); State Farm v. 123 S.Ct 1513 (2003); v. Liqqet Group, Inc., 945 So.2d 1246 (Fla. 2006). The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution and Florida's Constitution, Art. I, §§2 and 9, prohibit the imposition of grossly excessive or arbitrary punishments
+
+10.As to Plaintiff's claims for punitive damages in Count I — "Sexual Assault & Battery," and Count II — "Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress," the determination of whether or not Defendant is liable for punitive damages is required to be bifurcated from a determination of the amount to be imposed.
+
+11. Plaintiff has failed to state a cause of action for sexual assault and/or battery under Count I.
+
+12.As to Count III, Plaintiff has failed to plead a cause of action as she does not and can not show a violation of a predicate act under 18 U.S.C. §2255 (2005).
+
+13.As to Count III, the version of 18 U.S.C. §2255 in effect at the time of the alleged conduct applies, and, thus, the presumptive minimum damages amount should Plaintiff prove the elements of such claim is \$50,000, and not subject to any multiplier.
+
+14.As to Count III, application of the amended version of 18 U.S.C. §2255, effective July 27, 2006, would be in violation of the legal axiom against retroactive application of an amended statute, and also in violation of such constitutional principles, including but not limited to, the "Ex Post Facto" Clause, U.S. Const. Article I, §9, cl. 3, §10, cl. 1, and procedural and substantive due process, U.S. Const. 14th Amend., 5th Amend. The statute in effect during the time of the alleged conduct applies.
+
+15.As to Count III, application of the amended version of 18 U.S.C. §2255, effective July 27, 2006, is prohibited pursuant to the vagueness doctrine and the Rule of Lenity. A criminal statute is required to give " 'fair warning ... in language that the common world will understand, of what the law intends to do if a certain line is passed. To make the warning fair, so far as possible the line should be clear.' " United States v. Lanier, 520 U.S. 259, 265, 117 S.Ct. 1219, 137 L.Ed.2d 432 (1997) (quoting McBovle v. United States 283 U.S. 25, 27, 51 S.Ct. 340, 75 L.Ed. 816 (1931)) (omission in original). The "three related manifestations of the fair warning requirement" are: (1) the vagueness doctrine bars enforcement of a statute which either forbids or requires the doing of an act in terms so vague that men of common intelligence must necessarily guess at its meaning and differ as to its application; (2) the canon of strict construction of criminal statutes, or rule of lenity, ensures fair warning by so resolving ambiguity in a criminal statute as to apply it only to conduct clearly covered; (3) due process bars courts from
+
+applying a novel construction of a criminal statute to conduct that neither the statute nor any prior judicial decision has fairly disclosed to be within its scope.
+
+16. The applicable version of 18 U.S.C. §2255 creates a cause of action on behalf of a "minor." Plaintiff had attained the age of majority at the time of filing this action, and accordingly, her cause of action is barred.
+
+17.Because Plaintiff has no claim under 18 U.S.C. §2255, this Court is without subject matter jurisdiction as to all claims asserted.
+
+18.Application of the 18 U.S.C. §2255, as amended, effective July 27, 2006, is in violation of the constitutional principles of due process, the "Ex Post Facto" clause, and the Rule of Lenity, in that in amending the term "minor" to "person" as to those who may bring a cause of action impermissibly and unconstitutionally broadened the scope of persons able to bring a §2255 claim.
+
+19. 18 U.S.C. §2255 violates the Equal Protection Clause of the 14'h Amendment under the U.S. Constitution, and thus Plaintiff's claim thereunder is barred.
+
+20. 18 U.S.C. §2255 violates the constitutional guarantees of procedural and substantive due process. Procedural due process guarantees that a person will not be deprived of life, liberty or property without notice and opportunity to be heard. Substantive due process protects fundamental rights. Accordingly, Plaintiff's cause of action thereunder is barred.
+
+WHEREFORE Defendant requests that this Court deny the relief sought by Plaintiff.
+
+Robert D. Critton, Jr. Attorney for Defendant Epstein
+
+**Certificate of Service**
+
+I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record identified on the following Service List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on this \_\_\_ day of \_\_\_\_\_, 2009:
+
+Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq.  
+Adam D. Horowitz, Esq.  
+Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A.  
+18205 Biscayne Boulevard  
+Suite 2218  
+Miami, FL 33160  
+305-931-2200  
+Fax: 305-931-0877  
+[ssm@sexabuseattorney.com](mailto:ssm@sexabuseattorney.com)  
+[ahorowitz@sexabuseattorney.com](mailto:ahorowitz@sexabuseattorney.com)  
+Counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe #3
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger  
+Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.  
+250 Australian Avenue South  
+Suite 1400  
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012  
+561-659-8300  
+Fax: 561-835-8691  
+[jagesq@bellsouth.net](mailto:jagesq@bellsouth.net)  
+*Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein*
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+By: \_\_\_\_\_  
+ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ.  
+Florida Bar No. 224162  
+[rcrit@bclclaw.com](mailto:rcrit@bclclaw.com)  
+MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ.  
+Florida Bar #617296  
+[mpike@bclclaw.com](mailto:mpike@bclclaw.com)  
+BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN  
+515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400  
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401  
+561/842-2820 Phone  
+561/515-3148 Fax
+
+*(Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein)*
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740086/EFTA02740086.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740086/EFTA02740086.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b2f8a36387b5a63414f6f204ed4801bf91a27328
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740086/EFTA02740086.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,469 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740086.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 10,
+  "chars": 16277,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 6.11,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            199.512,
+            86.4375
+          ],
+          [
+            408.6499938964844,
+            86.4375
+          ],
+          [
+            408.6499938964844,
+            115.29998779296875
+          ],
+          [
+            199.512,
+            115.29998779296875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S FIRST AMENDED ANSWER & AFFIRMATIVE \nDEFENSES TO PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            104.03999999999999,
+            284.0674743652344
+          ],
+          [
+            506.63812255859375,
+            284.0674743652344
+          ],
+          [
+            506.63812255859375,
+            312.91998291015625
+          ],
+          [
+            104.03999999999999,
+            312.91998291015625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Affirmative Defenses",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            241.74,
+            216.9375
+          ],
+          [
+            368.62335205078125,
+            216.9375
+          ],
+          [
+            368.62335205078125,
+            231.91998291015625
+          ],
+          [
+            241.74,
+            231.91998291015625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Certificate of Service",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 9,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            259.488,
+            135.27
+          ],
+          [
+            382.5,
+            135.27
+          ],
+          [
+            382.5,
+            149.85000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            259.488,
+            149.85000000000002
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            64
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            9
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            58
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            65
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            58
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            59
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            9
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            24
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            55
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            9
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 9,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            13
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02740086"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740096/EFTA02740096.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740096/EFTA02740096.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..05b22b8454b77f12b9ae8bc1e178f92b9da18ba8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740096/EFTA02740096.md
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+May 29, 2009 Page 2
+
+## Written Consent to Amendment
+
+I hereby consent to Defendant EPSTEIN's request to amend his affirmative defenses as set forth in his proposed Defendant EPSTEIN's First Amended Answer & Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint in each of Plaintiffs, Jane Doe No.2, Jane Doe No.3, Jane Doe No.4, and Jane Doe No.5; and as set forth in Defendant EPSTEIN's First Amended Answer & Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiffs (First) Amended Compaint in Jane Doe No.6, and Jane Doe No.7.
+
+> C nsel for each of the Plaintiffs Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Mermelsteln & Horowitz, P.A. 18205 Biscayne Blvd. Suite 2218 Miami, FL 33160
+
+Jane Doe No. 2 v. Epstein, Case No. 08-80119 Jane Doe No. 3 v. Epstein, Case No. 08-80232 Jane Doe No. 4 v. Epstein, Case No. 0840380 Jane Doe No. 5 v. Epstein, Case No. 08-80381 Jane Doe No. 6 v. Epstein, Case No. 08-80994 Jane Doe No. 7 v. Epstein, Case No. 08-80993
+
+Dated: 7 -4"4 r; 2-oó 7
+
+EXHIBIT S
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740096/EFTA02740096.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740096/EFTA02740096.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a7118a3f8a3fa925013bdda95304d94a3c8139fe
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740096/EFTA02740096.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740096.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 1,
+  "chars": 986,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 0.46,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "Written Consent to Amendment",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            227.052,
+            150.29888916015625
+          ],
+          [
+            395.4900207519531,
+            150.29888916015625
+          ],
+          [
+            395.4900207519531,
+            165.05352783203125
+          ],
+          [
+            227.052,
+            165.05352783203125
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            56
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02740096"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740097/EFTA02740097.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740097/EFTA02740097.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..902587cfea9e83335734ed2e48a2f906ef9f3931
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740097/EFTA02740097.md
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA-=.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+v.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+/
+
+## ORDER ON DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S UNOPPOSED FIRST MOTION TO AMEND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
+
+This matter came before the Court on Defendant's, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Unopposed First Motion to Amend Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint. Having considered Defendant's motion and Plaintiff's counsel being in agreement with the requested amendment, it is HEREBY ORDERED and ADJUDGED that:
+
+Defendant's motion to amend is hereby GRANTED, Defendant shall file the Amended Answer within five (5) days.
+
+DONE and ORDERED this day of , 2009.
+
+Kenneth A. Marra United States District Judge
+
+Courtesy Copies: Counsel of Record
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740097/EFTA02740097.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740097/EFTA02740097.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0c24159bbb6b86005d305d8ba29f2b7c284c2ea8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740097/EFTA02740097.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740097.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 1,
+  "chars": 825,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 0.8,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            200.73600000000002,
+            93.15
+          ],
+          [
+            410.5299987792969,
+            93.15
+          ],
+          [
+            410.5299987792969,
+            121.67999267578125
+          ],
+          [
+            200.73600000000002,
+            121.67999267578125
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "ORDER ON DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S UNOPPOSED FIRST MOTION TO AMEND \nAFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            79.56,
+            319.14000000000004
+          ],
+          [
+            531.7650146484375,
+            319.14000000000004
+          ],
+          [
+            531.7650146484375,
+            348.54998779296875
+          ],
+          [
+            79.56,
+            348.54998779296875
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02740097"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740098/EFTA02740098.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740098/EFTA02740098.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7816dda3163540ad044fb5760abd07d935390802
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740098/EFTA02740098.md
@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRAMMI
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3
+
+Plaintiff, v.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S UNOPPOSED FIRST MOTION TO AMEND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
+
+Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, (hereinafter "EPSTEIN"), by and through his undersigned attorneys, moves to amend his affirmative defenses as set forth in the attached Defendant EPSTEIN's First Amended Answer & Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint, attached hereto as Exhibit A. Rule 15(a), Fed.R.Civ.P. (2009); Loc. Gen. Rules 7.1, 15.1 (S.D. Fla. 2009):
+
+1. Pursuant to Rule 15(a)(2), Fed.R.Civ.P., a party may amend his pleading "only with the opposing party's written consent or the court's leave. The court should freely give leave when justice so requires." Plaintiff's counsel has consented in writing to Defendant's proposed amendments set forth in Exhibit A hereto. Plaintiff's written consent to the amendment is attached hereto as Exhibit B.
+
+2. It is well settled that leave to amend is liberally granted where, as here, there is no resulting prejudice. The liberal allowance of pleading amendments is a "recognition that controversies should be decided on the merits whenever practicable." See generally, 27A Fed.Proc., Lawyers Ed. §62.273. Generally; freely allowed (2008). "In the absence of any apparent or declared reason—such as undue delay, bad faith or dilatory motive on the part of the movant, repeated failure to cure deficiencies by amendments previously allowed, undue prejudice to the opposing party by virtue of allowance of the amendment, futility of amendment, etc.--the leave sought should, as the rules require, be 'freely given.' " Foman v L.Ed.2d 222 (1962). 371 U.S. 178, 182, 83 S.Ct. 227, 9
+
+3. In the instant case, Defendant only amended his affirmative defenses. This is the first amendment sought by Defendant. Defendant's original Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint was recently filed with this Court on April 2, 2009. Recently certain constitutional issues have come to the forefront in other litigation filed against EPSTEIN based on similar allegations regarding the 18 U.S.C. §2255 claim and the punitive damages claim. Accordingly, Defendant seeks to add affirmative defenses directed to those claims. See affirmative defenses in Exhibit A hereto.
+
+4. There will be no resulting prejudice to Plaintiff should leave to amend be granted. Defendant has not unduly delayed this matter in seeking the amendments. Defendant by written correspondence sought Plaintiff's permission to amend. As noted, Plaintiff agreed in writing to the amendments. See Exhibit B hereto.
+
+5. Accordingly, Defendant is entitled to the amendments sought. Upon this Court entering the order granting Defendant's motion to amend, he will file and serve the Amended Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint. Loc. General Rule 15.1 (S.D. Fla. 2009).
+
+WHEREFORE, Defendant respectfully requests that this Court enter an order granting Defendant's motion to amend.
+
+## Rule 7.1 Certification
+
+I hereby certify that Defendant's counsel communicated in writing with Plaintiffs counsel regarding this motion to amend. Plaintiffs counsel agreed in writing to the proposed attached amendment (See Exhibit A and B).
+
+Robert D. Cri n, Jr. Attorney for efendant Epstein
+
+## Certificate of Service
+
+I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of recd r identified on the following Service List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on this day of June , 2009:
+
+Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A. 18205 Biscayne Boulevard Suite 2218 Miami, FL 33160 305-931-2200 Fax: 305-931-0877 ssm@sexabuseattorney.com ahorowitz sexabuseattornev.com Counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe #3
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 561-659-8300 Fax: 561-835-8691 jaqescabellsouth.net Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+![]()MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ.
+
+Florida Bar #617296
+
+[mpike@bclclaw.com](mailto:mpike@bclclaw.com)
+
+BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN
+
+515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400
+
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+
+561/842-2820 Phone
+
+561/515-3148 Fax
+
+*(Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein)*
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740098/EFTA02740098.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740098/EFTA02740098.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7bc6e135fb9e15a3e2918387f3d656fa6ac7f87e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740098/EFTA02740098.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,253 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740098.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 4,
+  "chars": 4547,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 3.23,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            200.73600000000002,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            411.6600036621094,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            411.6600036621094,
+            101.78997802734375
+          ],
+          [
+            200.73600000000002,
+            101.78997802734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S UNOPPOSED FIRST MOTION TO AMEND \nAFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            85.68,
+            306.18
+          ],
+          [
+            530.9510498046875,
+            306.18
+          ],
+          [
+            530.9510498046875,
+            337.66998291015625
+          ],
+          [
+            85.68,
+            337.66998291015625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Rule 7.1 Certification",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            252.144,
+            205.74
+          ],
+          [
+            378.9091491699219,
+            205.74
+          ],
+          [
+            378.9091491699219,
+            221.04998779296875
+          ],
+          [
+            252.144,
+            221.04998779296875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Certificate of Service",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            262.548,
+            398.52
+          ],
+          [
+            388.525390625,
+            398.52
+          ],
+          [
+            388.525390625,
+            414.17999267578125
+          ],
+          [
+            262.548,
+            414.17999267578125
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            49
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            49
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            77
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            38
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            24
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02740098"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740102/EFTA02740102.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740102/EFTA02740102.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0da45617a0258de69cf3fe081167631c8b1de01e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740102/EFTA02740102.md
@@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRa.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+v.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S FIRST AMENDED ANSWER & AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
+
+Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, (hereinafter "EPSTEIN"), by and through his undersigned attorneys, files his First Amended Answer to the Second Amended Complaint [DE 50] and states:
+
+- 1. Without knowledge and deny.
+
+2. As to the allegations in paragraphs 2, Defendant asserts his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. See DeLisi v. Bankers Ins. Company, <sup>436</sup>So.2d <sup>1099</sup>(Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Malloy v. Hogan, <sup>84</sup>S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment - up would be incongruous to have different standards determine the validity of a claim of privilege based on the same feared prosecution, depending on whether the claim was asserted in state or federal court."); <sup>5</sup> Fed.Prac. & Proc. Civ. 3d §1280 Effect of Failure to Deny — Privilege Against Self-Incrimination ("...court must treat the defendant's claim of privilege as equivalent to <sup>a</sup> specific denial."). See also 24 Fla.Jur.2d Evidence §592. Defendants in civil actions. -
+
+"... a civil defendant who raises an affirmative defense is not precluded from asserting the privilege [against self-incrimination], because affirmative defenses do not constitute the kind of voluntary application for affirmative relief' which would prevent a plaintiff bringing aclaim seeking affirmative relief from asserting the privilege.
+
+3. As to the allegations in paragraph 3, deny.
+
+4. As to the allegations in paragraph 4, deny.
+
+5. As to the allegations in paragraph 5, without knowledge and deny.
+
+6. As to the allegations in paragraphs 6, Defendant asserts his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. See DeLisi v. Bankers Ins. Company, <sup>436</sup>So.2d <sup>1099</sup>(Fla. 4th DCA 1983)• Malloy v. Hogan, <sup>84</sup>S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment - "[i]t would be incongruous to have different standards determine the validity of a claim of privilege based on the same feared prosecution, depending on whether the claim was asserted in state or federal court."); <sup>5</sup> Fed.Prac. & Proc. Civ. 3d §1280 Effect of Failure to Deny — Privilege Against Self-Incrimination ("...court must treat the defendant's claim of privilege as equivalent to <sup>a</sup> specific denial."). See also 24 Fla.Jur.2d Evidence §592. Defendants in civil actions. — "... a civil defendant who raises an affirmative defense is not precluded from asserting the privilege [against self-incrimination], because affirmative defenses do not constitute the kind of voluntary application for affirmative relief" which would prevent a plaintiff bringing aclaim seeking affirmative relief from asserting the privilege.
+
+7. As to the allegations in paragraphs 7 through 14 of Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint, Defendant exercises his Fifth Amendment Privilege against selfincrimination. See DeLisi v. Bankers Ins. Company, 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Malloy v. Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment - "[i]t would be incongruous to have different standards determine the validity of a claim of privilege based on the same feared prosecution, depending on whether the claim was asserted in state or federal court."); 5 Fed.Prac. & Proc. Civ. 3d §1280 Effect of Failure to Deny - Privilege Against Self-Incrimination ("...court must treat the defendant's claim of privilege as equivalent to a specific denial."). See also 24 FIa.Jur.2d Evidence §592. Defendants in civil actions. —"... a civil defendant who raises an affirmative defense is not precluded from asserting the privilege [against self-incrimination), because affirmative defenses do not constitute the kind of voluntary application for affirmative relief" which would prevent a plaintiff bringing a claim seeking affirmative relief from asserting the privilege.
+
+8. In response to the allegations of paragraph 15, Defendant realleges and adopts his responses to paragraphs 1 through 14 of the Second Amended Complaint set forth in paragraphs 1 through 6 above herein.
+
+9. Defendant asserts the Fifth Amendment Privilege against self-incrimination to the allegations set forth in paragraphs 16 through 21 of the Second Amended Complaint. See DeLisi v. Bankers Ins. Company, 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Malloy v. Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination
+
+Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment - "lilt would be incongruous to have different standards determine the validity of a claim of privilege based on the same feared prosecution, depending on whether the claim was asserted in state or federal court."); 5 Fed.Prac. & Proc. Civ. 3d §1280 Effect of Failure to Deny — Privilege Against Self-Incrimination ("...court must treat the defendant's claim of privilege as equivalent to a specific denial"). See also <sup>24</sup> Fla.Jur.2d Evidence §592. Defendants in civil actions. — "... a civil defendant who raises an affirmative defense is not precluded from asserting the privilege [against selfincrimination], because affirmative defenses do not constitute the kind of voluntary application for affirmative relief which would prevent a plaintiff bringing aclaim seeking affirmative relief from asserting the privilege.
+
+10. In response to the allegations of paragraph 22, Defendant realleges and adopts his responses to paragraphs 1 through 14 of the Second Amended Complaint set forth in paragraphs 1 through 6 above herein.
+
+11. Defendant asserts the Fifth Amendment Privilege against self-incrimination to the allegations set forth in paragraphs 23 through 27 of the Second Amended Complaint. See DeLisi v. Bankers Ins. Company, <sup>436</sup>So.2d 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Malloy v. Hogan, <sup>84</sup>S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment - "lilt would be incongruous to have different standards determine the validity of a claim of privilege based on the same feared prosecution, depending on whether the claim was asserted in state or federal court."); 5 Fed.Prac. & Proc. Civ. 3d
+
+§1280 Effect of Failure to Deny — Privilege Against Self-Incrimination ("...court must treat the defendants claim of privilege as equivalent to a specific denial."). See also <sup>24</sup> Fla.Jur.2d Evidence §592. Defendants in civil actions. —"... a civil defendant who raises an affirmative defense is not precluded from asserting the privilege [against selfincrimination], because affirmative defenses do not constitute the kind of voluntary application for affirmative relief" which would prevent a plaintiff bringing aclaim seeking affirmative relief from asserting the privilege.
+
+12. In response to the allegations of paragraph 28, Defendant realleges and adopts his responses to paragraphs 1 through 14 of the Second Amended Complaint set forth in paragraphs 1 through 6 above herein.
+
+13. Defendant asserts the Fifth Amendment Privilege against self-incrimination to the allegations set forth in paragraphs 29 through 34 of the Second Amended Complaint. See DeLisi v. Bankers Ins. Company, <sup>436</sup>So.2d 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Malloy v. Hogan, <sup>84</sup>S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Clause applies to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment - "Mt would be incongruous to have different standards determine the validity of a claim of privilege based on the same feared prosecution, depending on whether the claim was asserted in state or federal court."); 5 Fed.Prac. & Proc. Civ. 3d §1280 Effect of Failure to Deny - Privilege Against Self-Incrimination ("...court must treat the defendant's claim of privilege as equivalent to a specific denial."). See also <sup>24</sup> Fla.Jur.2d Evidence §592. Defendants in civil actions. —"... a civil defendant who raises an affirmative defense is not precluded from asserting the privilege [against self-
+
+incrimination], because affirmative defenses do not constitute the kind of voluntary application for affirmative relief' which would prevent a plaintiff bringing aclaim seeking affirmative relief from asserting the privilege.
+
+WHEREFORE, Defendant requests that this Court deny the relief sought by Plaintiff.
+
+## Affirmative Defenses
+
+1. As to all counts, Plaintiff actually consented to and was <sup>a</sup>willing participant in the acts alleged, and therefore, her claims are barred, or her damages are required to be reduced accordingly.
+
+2. As to all counts alleged, Plaintiff actually consented to and participated in conduct similar and/or identical to the acts alleged with other persons which were the sole or contributing cause of Plaintiffs alleged damages.
+
+3. As to all counts, Plaintiff impliedly consented to the acts alleged by not objecting and by going to Defendant's home with other females and/or by bringing other females to Defendant's home for which Plaintiff received money, and therefore, her claims are barred, or her damages are required to be reduced accordingly.
+
+4. As to all counts, Defendant reasonably believed or was told that the Plaintiff had attained the age of 18 years old at the time of the alleged acts.
+
+5. As to all counts, Plaintiff's claims are barred as she said she was 18 years or older at the time.
+
+6. As to all counts, Plaintiffs alleged damages were caused in whole or part by events and/or circumstances completely unrelated to the incident(s) alleged in the complaint.
+
+7. Plaintiffs claims are barred by the applicable statute of limitations.
+
+8. As to Plaintiff's claims for punitive damages in Count I — "Sexual Assault & Battery," and Count II — "Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress," such claims are subject to the limitations as set forth in §768.72, et seq., Florida Statutes.
+
+9. As to Plaintiffs claims for punitive damages in Count I — "Sexual Assault & Battery," and Count II — "Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress," such claims are subject to the constitutional limitations and guideposts as set forth in BMW of North America v. Gore, <sup>116</sup>S.Ct 1589 (1996). Philip Morris USA v. <sup>127</sup>S.Ct. <sup>1057</sup> (2007); State Farm <sup>123</sup>S.Ct 1513 (2003); v. Liqqet Group, Inc. <sup>945</sup> So.2d 1246 (Fla. 2006). The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution and Florida's Constitution, Art. I, §§2 and 9, prohibit the imposition of grossly excessive or arbitrary punishments
+
+10.As to Plaintiffs claims for punitive damages in Count I — "Sexual Assault & Battery," and Count II — "Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress," the determination of whether or not Defendant is liable for punitive damages is required to be bifurcated from <sup>a</sup>determination of the amount to be imposed.
+
+11. Plaintiff has failed to state a cause of action for sexual assault and/or battery under Count I.
+
+12.As to Count III, Plaintiff has failed to plead acause of action as she does not and can not show a violation of a predicate act under 18 U.S.C. §2255 (2005).
+
+13.As to Count III, the version of 18 U.S.C. §2255 in effect at the time of the alleged conduct applies, and, thus, the presumptive minimum damages amount should Plaintiff prove the elements of such claim is \$50,000, and not subject to any multiplier.
+
+14.As to Count III, application of the amended version of 18 U.S.C. §2255, effective July 27, 2006, would be in violation of the legal axiom against retroactive application of an amended statute, and also in violation of such constitutional principles, including but not limited to, the "Ex Post Facto" Clause, U.S. Const. Article I, §9, cl. 3, §10, cl. 1, and procedural and substantive due process, U.S. Const. 14th Amend., 5th Amend. The statute in effect during the time of the alleged conduct applies.
+
+15.As to Count Ill, application of the amended version of 18 U.S.C. §2255, effective July 27, 2006, is prohibited pursuant to the vagueness doctrine and the Rule of Lenity. <sup>A</sup>criminal statute is required to give " 'fair warning ... in language that the common world will understand, of what the law intends to do if a certain line is passed. To make the warning fair, so far as possible the line should be clear.' " United States v. Lanier, <sup>520</sup>U.S. 259, 265, 117 S.Ct. 1219, 137 L.Ed.2d 432 (1997) (quoting McBovle v. United States 283 U.S. 25, 27, 51 S.Ct. 340, 75 L.Ed. 816 (1931)) (omission in original). The "three related manifestations of the fair warning requirement" are: (1) the vagueness doctrine bars enforcement of a statute which either forbids or requires the doing of an act in terms so vague that men of common intelligence must necessarily guess at its meaning and differ as to its application; (2) the canon of strict construction of criminal statutes, or rule of lenity, ensures fair warning by so resolving ambiguity in a criminal statute as to apply it only to conduct clearly covered; (3) due process bars courts from
+
+applying anovel construction of a criminal statute to conduct that neither the statute nor any prior judicial decision has fairly disclosed to be within its scope.
+
+16.The applicable version of 18 U.S.C. §2255 creates a cause of action on behalf of <sup>a</sup>"minor." Plaintiff had attained the age of majority at the time of filing this action, and accordingly, her cause of action is barred.
+
+17.Because Plaintiff has no claim under 18 U.S.C. §2255, this Court is without subject matter jurisdiction as to all claims asserted.
+
+18. Application of the 18 U.S.C. §2255, as amended, effective July 27, 2006, is in violation of the constitutional principles of due process, the "Ex Post Facto" clause, and the Rule of Lenity, in that in amending the term "minor" to "person" as to those who may bring acause of action impermissibly and unconstitutionally broadened the scope of persons able to bring a §2255 claim.
+
+19. 18 U.S.C. §2255 violates the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment under the U.S. Constitution, and thus Plaintiffs claim thereunder is barred.
+
+20. 18 U.S.C. §2255 violates the constitutional guarantees of procedural and substantive due process. Procedural due process guarantees that a person will not be deprived of life, liberty or property without notice and opportunity to be heard. Substantive due process protects fundamental rights. Accordingly, Plaintiffs cause of action thereunder is barred.
+
+WHEREFORE Defendant requests that this Court deny the olef s. ght by Plaintiff.
+
+Robert D. Attorney f tton, Jr. Defendant Epstein
+
+## Certificate of Service
+
+<sup>I</sup>HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of recorg identified on the following Service List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on this pniffay of , 2009:
+
+Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A. 18205 Biscayne Boulevard Suite 2218 Miami, FL 33160 305-931-2200 Fax: 305-931-0877 ssmsexabuseattomev.com ahorowitz sexabuseattorney.corn Counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe #3
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 561-659-8300 Fax: 561-835-8691 jaqesqRbellsouth.net Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
+
+Respectfully sub
+
+By: ROBERT D. ITTON, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar N . 224162 rcrit bciclaw.com MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 rrinike bcIclaw.com BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN 515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561/842-2820 Phone 561/515-3148 Fax (Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein)
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740102/EFTA02740102.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740102/EFTA02740102.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d68f01534bd073201a4dee1f963306323443f821
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740102/EFTA02740102.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,477 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740102.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 10,
+  "chars": 16271,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.69,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            197.676,
+            89.91
+          ],
+          [
+            404.8974914550781,
+            89.91
+          ],
+          [
+            404.8974914550781,
+            116.63999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            197.676,
+            116.63999999999999
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S FIRST AMENDED ANSWER & AFFIRMATIVE \nDEFENSES TO PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            104.03999999999999,
+            285.92999999999995
+          ],
+          [
+            504.3509826660156,
+            285.92999999999995
+          ],
+          [
+            504.3509826660156,
+            315.9
+          ],
+          [
+            104.03999999999999,
+            315.9
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Affirmative Defenses",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            241.74,
+            221.13000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            367.5293884277344,
+            221.13000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            367.5293884277344,
+            234.89999999999998
+          ],
+          [
+            241.74,
+            234.89999999999998
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Certificate of Service",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 9,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            257.652,
+            137.70000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            384.4053649902344,
+            137.70000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            384.4053649902344,
+            152.04547119140625
+          ],
+          [
+            257.652,
+            152.04547119140625
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            242
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            314
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            65
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            334
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            333
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            288
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            9
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            307
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            24
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            379
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            303
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            9
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 9,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            237
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            43
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02740102"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740112/EFTA02740112.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740112/EFTA02740112.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..341f25eccef63d122e933380199c05228340d792
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740112/EFTA02740112.md
@@ -0,0 +1,322 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 2,
+
+Plaintiff
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant
+
+JANE DOE NO. 4,
+
+Plaintiff
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant
+
+CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MARRA
+
+CASE NO: 08-CV-80232-MARRA
+
+CASE NO: 08-CV-80380-MARRA
+
+CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MARRAi
+
+JANE DOE NO. 5, CASE NO: 08-CV-80381-MARRA
+
+CASE NO: 08-CV-80994-MARRA
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant
+
+JANE DOE NO. 7, CASE NO: 08-CV-80993-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff
+
+Plaintiff
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant
+
+JANE DOE NO. 6.
+
+Plaintiff
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant
+
+CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MARRAi
+
+CASE NO: 08-CV-80811-MARRA
+
+C.M.A.,
+
+Plaintiff
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant
+
+JANE DOE, CASE NO. 08-CV-80893-CIV-MARRA/
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+Vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN, et al.
+
+Defendant.
+
+DOE II, CASE NO: 09-CV-80469-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN, et al.
+
+Defendants.
+
+CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MARRa
+
+JANE DOE NO. 101, CASE NO: 09-CV-80591-MARRa
+
+Plaintiff
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant
+
+JANE DOE NO. 102, CASE NO: 09-CV-80656-MARRAi
+
+Plaintiff
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant
+
+## PLAINTIFF JANE DOE'S MOTION TO COMPEL ANSWERS TO PLAINTFF'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
+
+Plaintiff Jane Doe, hereby moves this Court for an order compelling defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, to answer her first request for production or, in the alternative, to prove that his invocation of his Fifth Amendment privilege is proper. Jane Doe also requests production of a privilege log.
+
+Jane Doe has propounded 16 requests for production, including such straightforward requests as requests for production of:
+
+CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MARRA
+
+Request No. 1: Copies of all telephone records;
+
+Request No. 2: Photos of the inside of your home located at 358 El Brillo Way, Palm Beach, Florida, that depict the room(s) where massages took place (including massage table).
+
+Request No. 10: Correspondence between Epstein and federal prosecutors;
+
+Request No. 12: Personal tax returns;
+
+Request No. 13: Photocopies of Epstein's passport;
+
+Request No. 14: A statement of net worth; and
+
+Request No. 16: Medical records.
+
+In response to each and every one of these requests, Epstein has given the following response (with only minor variations here and there):
+
+Defendant is asserting his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that at the present time I cannot select authenticate, and produce documents relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution.
+
+This Court should order Epstein to provide all of the requested information or, in the alternative, prove that his Fifth Amendment invocations are valid. It is for the court, not the claimant, to determine whether the hazard of incrimination is justified. United States v. Argomaniz, 925 F.2d 1349, 1355 (11th Cir. 1991). "A court must make a particularized inquiry, deciding, in connection with each specific area that the
+
+CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MARRAi
+
+questioning party wishes to explore, whether or not the privilege is well-founded." Id. Typically this is done in an in camera proceeding wherein the person asserting the privilege is given the opportunity "to substantiate his claims of the privilege and the district court is able to consider the questions asked and the documents requested by the summons." Id.
+
+Here Epstein has made boilerplate invocation of the Fifth Amendment to each and every request propounded by Jane Doe, including for example the request for correspondence with federal prosecutors and for production of federal tax returns. This obviously is not a request with Fifth Amendment implications, as the information has already been fully disclosed to the Government.
+
+For all these reasons, the Court should compel Epstein to answer the requests or provide a particularized justification for his Fifth Amendment invocation with regard to each request.
+
+Epstein's "cut and paste" response to the request for production also blatantly disregards the requirements for invoking privilege under the Court's local rules. Local rule 26.1.G very specifically requires the preparation of a privilege log with respect to all documents and oral communications (among other things) that are withheld on the basis of privilege. Epstein has failed to prepare such a log, making it impossible for Jane Doe to effectively challenge his generic assertions. Indeed, with respect to a few requests, Epstein has stated: "Further, the request may include information subject to work product or an attorney-client privilege." Of course, the whole purpose of forcing a defendant to prepare a privilege log is to force the defendant to decide whether or not
+
+CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MARRA
+
+information is privileged. An assertion that something "may" be privileged is obviously woefully deficient. The Local Rules do not permit this tactic, and Epstein should be (at a minimum) promptly required to produce a privilege log.
+
+For all these reasons, the Court should compel Epstein to provide a privilege log and to answer the interrogatories or provide a particularized justification for his Fifth Amendment invocation with regard to each request.
+
+It should be noted that (with minor exceptions) the only grounds on which Epstein can refuse to answer the request for production is proof of a valid Fifth Amendment privilege. This the only objection Epstein has asserted (with minor exceptions). As a result, any other objections to production are deemed waived. See Local Rule 26.1G.3.(a) ("Any ground [for an objection] not stated in an objection within the time provided by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, or any extensions thereof, shall be waived.").
+
+# SPECIFIC REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION
+
+For the convenience of the court — and in compliance with Local Rule 26.1 H (party filing motion to compel shall list specific requests in succession) — Jane Doe's requests for production and Epstein's objections are as follows:
+
+Request No. 1: Copies of all telephone records in your or your attorney's possession from 2002 through 2005 that in any way relate to you (including all phone lines owned by you or that were used to contact girls for the purposes of scheduling massages for you.)
+
+Defendant is asserting his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that at the present time I cannot select authenticate, and produce documents relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective
+
+representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution.
+
+Request No. 2: All massage appointment books, diaries, computer calendars or scheduling entities, scheduling books or any other writing or correspondence that contains the names of any of the girls that were called, contacted, scheduled or who otherwise went to your home located at 358 El Brillo Way, Palm Beach, Florida, for the purpose of giving you a massage.
+
+Defendant is asserting his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that at the present time I cannot select authenticate, and produce documents relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution.
+
+Request No. 3: Any and all documentation in your possession that contains Plaintiff's name or that refers to Plaintiff, directly or indirectly, (includes e-mails, letters, message pads, diaries, appointment books, computer print outs).
+
+Defendant is asserting his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that at the present time I cannot select authenticate, and produce documents relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution.
+
+Request No. 4: Any and all photos, videos, downloaded digital prints or any other visual depiction of Plaintiff, or of any other known or suspected minor females introduced to you, directly or indirectly, by Plaintiff.
+
+Defendant is asserting his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that at the present time I cannot select authenticate, and produce documents relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution.
+
+Request No. 5: Photos of the inside or your home located at 358 El Brillo Way, Palm Beach, Florida, that depict the room(s) where the massages too place (including massage table).
+
+Defendant is asserting his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that at the present time I cannot select authenticate, and produce documents relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution.
+
+Request No. 6: Any and all documentation of cancelled checks or evidence of payment to Plaintiff of any kind and for any reason whatsoever.
+
+Defendant is asserting his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that at the present time I cannot select authenticate, and produce documents relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution.
+
+Request No. 7: All discovery information obtained by you or your attorneys as a result of the exchange of discovery in the State criminal case against you or the Federal investigation against you.
+
+Defendant is asserting his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that at the present time I cannot select authenticate, and produce documents relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, the information sought is privileged and confidential, and inadmissible to the terms of the deferred prosecution agreement, Federal Rule of Evidence 410 and 408, and § 90.410, Fla. Stat.<sup>1</sup> Further, the request may including information subject to work product or an attorney-client privilege.
+
+Request No. 8: All financial documents evidencing asset transfers from 2005 to present for you personally or any company or corporation owned by you.
+
+Defendant is asserting his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that at the present time I cannot select authenticate, and produce documents relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution.
+
+---
+
+<sup>1</sup> Jane Doe does not intend to use these materials to draw a forbidden inference of guilt from the mere fact that information was provided to law enforcement officials as part of plea discussions, but rather for other purposes. These materials are also quite clearly likely to lead to the discovery of other admissible evidence, as they relate to the same subject matter as this lawsuit. To the extent that Epstein relies on the non-prosecution agreement, nothing in that agreement bars *discovery* of information relevant to this lawsuit.
+
+Request No. 9: Any documents or other evidentiary materials provided to local, state, or federal law enforcement investigators or local, state or federal prosecutors investigating your sexual activities with minors.
+
+Defendant is asserting his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that at the present time I cannot select authenticate, and produce documents relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, the information sought is privileged and confidential, and inadmissible pursuant to the terms of the deferred prosecution agreement, Fed. Rule of Evidence 410 and 408, and § 90.410, Fla. Stat.<sup>2</sup> Further, the request may include information subject to work product or an attorney-client privilege.
+
+Request No. 10: All correspondence between you and your attorneys and state or federal law enforcement or prosecutors (includes, but not limited to, letters to and from the States Attorney's office or any agents thereof).
+
+Defendant is asserting his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that at the present time I cannot select authenticate, and produce documents relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, the information sought is privileged and confidential, and inadmissible pursuant to the terms of the deferred prosecution agreement,
+
+---
+
+<sup>2</sup> Jane Doe does not intend to use these materials to draw a forbidden inference of guilt from the mere fact of plea discussions, but rather for other purposes. These materials are also likely to lead to the discovery of other admissible evidence. To the extent that Epstein relies on the non-prosecution agreement, nothing in that agreement bars discovery of information relevant to this lawsuit.
+
+Fed. Rule of Evidence 410 and 408, and § 90.410, Fla. Stat.<sup>3</sup> Further, the request may include information subject to work product or an attorney-client privilege.
+
+Request No. 11: Any and all documents reflecting your current net worth.
+
+Defendant is asserting his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that at the present time I cannot select authenticate, and produce documents relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution.
+
+Request No. 12: Personal tax returns for all years from 2002 through the present.
+
+Defendant is asserting his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that at the present time I cannot select authenticate, and produce documents relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution; overly broad.
+
+Request No. 13: A photocopy of your passport, including any supplemental pages reflecting travel to locations outside the 50 United States between 2002 and 2008, including any documents or records regarding plane tickets, hotel receipts, or transportation arrangements.
+
+---
+
+<sup>3</sup> Jane Doe does not intend to use these materials to draw a forbidden inference of guilt from the mere fact of correspondence in connection with plea discussions, but rather for other purposes. These materials are also likely to lead to the discovery of other admissible evidence. To the extent that Epstein relies on the non-prosecution agreement, nothing in that agreement bars *discovery* of information relevant to this lawsuit.
+
+Defendant is asserting his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that at the present time I cannot select authenticate, and produce documents relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional protections and privileges, the scope of information is so overbroad that it seeks information that is neither relevant nor reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; compiling such information over a six year period would be unduly burdensome and time consuming.<sup>4</sup>
+
+Request No. 14: A sworn statement of your net worth (including a detailed financial statement depicting all current assets and liabilities).
+
+Defendant is asserting his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that at the present time I cannot select authenticate, and produce documents relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution.
+
+Request No. 15: All financial statements or affidavits produced by you for any reason, to any person, company, entity or corporation since 2005.
+
+Defendant is asserting his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that at the present time I cannot select authenticate, and produce documents relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United
+
+---
+
+<sup>4</sup> Jane Doe believes that Epstein used overseas travel as a means of obtaining underage girls for sexual purposes and for avoiding criminal prosecution for such activities. Also, providing a copy of a passport is hardly "burdensome." Also, given the fact that Epstein is likely to have used the services of a travel agent or another intermediary, it should not be difficult for him to provide evidence of his overseas travels from such intermediaries.
+
+States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution; overly broad.
+
+Request No. 16: All medical records of Defendant Epstein from Dr. Stephan Alexander.
+
+Defendant is asserting his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that at the present time I cannot select authenticate, and produce documents relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution.
+
+### CONCLUSION
+
+For all these reasons, the Court should compel Epstein to answer the request for production, or provide a particularized justification for his Fifth Amendment invocation with regard to each request. Epstein should also be required to provide a privilege log. Counsel for Jane Doe have conferred with opposing counsel on the issues raised in this motion, and no resolution was possible.
+
+DATED July 10, 2009
+
+Respectfully Submitted,
+
+s/ [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]  
+[REDACTED] J. [REDACTED]  
+ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER  
+Las Olas City Centre  
+401 East Las Olas Blvd., Suite 1650  
+Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301  
+Telephone (954) 522-3456  
+Facsimile (954) 527-8663  
+Florida Bar No.: 542075  
+E-mail: [bedwards@rra-law.com](mailto:bedwards@rra-law.com)
+
+CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MARRa
+
+and
+
+Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice 332 S. 1400 E. Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Telephone: 801-585-5202 Facsimile: 801-585-6833 E-Mail: cassellp@law.utah.edu
+
+## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
+
+I HEREBY CERTIFY that on July 10, 2009, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all parties on the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those parties who are not authorized to receive electronically filed Notices of Electronic Filing.
+
+> s/ J.
+
+CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MARRa
+
+## SERVICE LIST Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Jaoldberaer@aqwpa.com
+
+Robert D. Critton, Esq. rcritton@bcIclaw.com
+
+Isidro Manual isidrooarcia@bellsouth.net
+
+Jack iph@searcylaw.com •
+
+Katherine Warthen Ezell KEzell@podhurst.com
+
+Michael James Pike MPike@bciclaw.com
+
+Paul G. Cassell cassellp@bciclaw.com
+
+Richard Horace Willits lawverswillits@aol.com
+
+Robert C. Josefsberg rjosefsberg@podhurst.com
+
+Adam D. Horowitz ahorowitz@sexabuseattornev.com
+
+Stuart S. Mermelstein ssm@sexabuseattorney.com
+
+William J. Berger wberger@rra-law.com
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740112/EFTA02740112.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740112/EFTA02740112.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..185c1dd6c8ec768ffc5068e5900fb0face25dee8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740112/EFTA02740112.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,691 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740112.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 16,
+  "chars": 26492,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 13.05,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            201.348,
+            106.92
+          ],
+          [
+            410.47198486328125,
+            106.92
+          ],
+          [
+            410.47198486328125,
+            135.43353271484375
+          ],
+          [
+            201.348,
+            135.43353271484375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "PLAINTIFF JANE DOE'S MOTION TO COMPEL ANSWERS TO PLAINTFF'S FIRST \nREQUEST FOR PRODUCTION",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            74.05199999999999,
+            520.83
+          ],
+          [
+            538.7138671875,
+            520.83
+          ],
+          [
+            538.7138671875,
+            549.4335174560547
+          ],
+          [
+            74.05199999999999,
+            549.4335174560547
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "SPECIFIC REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            184.82399999999998,
+            464.93999999999994
+          ],
+          [
+            428.1395568847656,
+            464.93999999999994
+          ],
+          [
+            428.1395568847656,
+            480.54998779296875
+          ],
+          [
+            184.82399999999998,
+            480.54998779296875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CONCLUSION",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 13,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            261.936,
+            369.36
+          ],
+          [
+            347.00399999999996,
+            369.36
+          ],
+          [
+            347.00399999999996,
+            383.13
+          ],
+          [
+            261.936,
+            383.13
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 14,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            225.216,
+            314.0675048828125
+          ],
+          [
+            387.0013122558594,
+            314.0675048828125
+          ],
+          [
+            387.0013122558594,
+            329.04998779296875
+          ],
+          [
+            225.216,
+            329.04998779296875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "SERVICE LIST \nJane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein \nUnited States District Court, Southern District of Florida",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 15,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            143.82,
+            119.88
+          ],
+          [
+            468.96051025390625,
+            119.88
+          ],
+          [
+            468.96051025390625,
+            163.67999267578125
+          ],
+          [
+            143.82,
+            163.67999267578125
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            43
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            22
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            19
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            39
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            20
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            19
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            39
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            20
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            20
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            43
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            22
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            15
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            61
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            31
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            11
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            59
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            30
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            14
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 9,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 10,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 11,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            14
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 12,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 13,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            17
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 14,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            41
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            21
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 15,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            63
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            32
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            13
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02740112"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740128/EFTA02740128.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740128/EFTA02740128.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..966822c6d0d0d0b8b21f665b1bec8786bb45354e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740128/EFTA02740128.md
@@ -0,0 +1,254 @@
+#### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 2,
+
+Plaintiff
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant
+
+JANE DOE NO. 4,
+
+Plaintiff
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant
+
+CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MARRA
+
+CASE NO: 08-CV-80232-MARRA
+
+CASE NO: 08-CV-80380-MARRA
+
+CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MARRA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 5, CASE NO: 08-CV-80381-MARRA
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant
+
+JANE DOE NO. 6. CASE NO: 08-CV-80994-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant
+
+JANE DOE NO. 7, CASE NO: 08-CV-80993-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff
+
+Plaintiff
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant
+
+CASE NO: 08•CV-80119-MARRA/
+
+CASE NO: 08-CV-80811-MARRAi
+
+C.M.A.,
+
+Plaintiff
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant
+
+JANE DOE, CASE NO. 08-CV-80893-CIV-MARRA,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+Vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN, et al.
+
+Defendant.
+
+DOE II, CASE NO: 09-CV-80469-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN, et al.
+
+Defendants.
+
+CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MARRA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 101, CASE NO: 09-CV-80591-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant
+
+JANE DOE NO. 102, CASE NO: 09-CV-80656-MARRAi
+
+Plaintiff
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant
+
+#### PLAINTIFF JANE DOE'S MOTION TO COMPEL ANSWERS TO PLAINTFF'S FIRST REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO DEFENDANT
+
+Plaintiff Jane Doe, hereby moves this Court for an order compelling defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, to answer her first requests for admissions or, in the alternative, to prove that his invocation of his Fifth Amendment privilege is proper.
+
+Jane Doe has propounded 23 requests for admission to Epstein, including such straightforward requests as:
+
+- Your net worth is greater than \$1 billion.
+
+CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MARRa
+
+- You own or control, directly or indirectly, real estate property in foreign countries.
+- You are moving significant financial assets overseas, outside of the direct territorial reach of the U.S. and Florida Courts.
+- You currently have the ability to post a bond of \$15 million to satisfy a judgment in this case without financial or other difficulty.
+
+In response to each and every one of these questions, Epstein has given the following response:
+
+In response, Defendant asserts his U.S. constitutional privileges as specified herein. I intend to respond to all relevant discovery regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any discovery relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by the United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution.
+
+This Court should order Epstein to answer all of the requests for admission or, in the alternative, prove that his Fifth Amendment invocations are valid. It is for the court, not the claimant, to determine whether the hazard of incrimination is justified. United States v. Argomaniz, 925 F.2d 1349, 1355 (11th Cir. 1991). "A court must make a particularized inquiry, deciding, in connection with each specific area that the questioning party wishes to explore, whether or not the privilege is well-founded." Id. Typically this is done in an in camera proceeding wherein the person asserting the privilege is given the opportunity "to substantiate his claims of the privilege and the
+
+CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MARRa
+
+district court is able to consider the questions asked and the documents requested by the summons." Id.
+
+Here Epstein has made boilerplate invocation of the Fifth Amendment to each and every question propounded by Jane Doe, including for example a request that he admit that his net worth is more than \$500 million. It is not apparent how admitting his net worth is incriminating in the circumstances of this case. In any event, the Fifth Amendment does not operate in this fashion. It is Epstein's obligation to explain his claims on a "question-by-question basis." Id.
+
+The only issue before the Court is Epstein's Fifth Amendment privilege. Epstein has only asserted a Fifth Amendment objection to production. As a result, any other objections to production are deemed waived. See Local Rule 26.1G.3.(a) ("Any ground [for an objection] not stated in an objection within the time provided by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, or any extensions thereof, shall be waived.").
+
+## SPECIFIC REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION
+
+For the convenience of the court — and in compliance with Local Rule 26.1 H (party filing motion to compel shall list specific requests in succession) — Jane Doe's requests for admission are as follows:
+
+- 1. Your net worth is greater than \$10 million.
+- 2. Your net worth is greater than \$50 million.
+- 3. Your net worth is greater than \$100 million.
+- 4. Your net worth is greater than \$500 million.
+- 5. Your net worth is greater than \$1 billion.
+
+CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MARRa
+
+6. Since being incarcerated you have, directly or indirectly (through the services or assistance of other persons), conveyed money or assets in an attempt to insulate or protect your money or assets from being captured in any civil lawsuits filed against you.
+
+7. You own or control, directly or indirectly, real estate property in the Caribbean.
+
+8. You own or control, directly or indirectly, real estate property in foreign countries.
+
+9. In the last 2 years you have transferred assets and/or money and/or financial instruments to countries outside the United States.
+
+10. You have provided financial support to the modeling agency MC2.
+
+11. You have committed sexual assault against Plaintiff, a minor.
+
+12. You committed battery against Plaintiff.
+
+13. You digitally penetrated Plaintiff when she was a minor.
+
+14. You offered Plaintiff more money contingent upon her having sex with your or giving you oral sex.
+
+15. You intended to harm Plaintiff when you committed these sexual acts against her.
+
+16. You knew Plaintiff was under the age of 16 when you sexually touched and fondled her.
+
+17. You intend to hire investigators to intimidate and harass Plaintiff during this litigation.
+
+18. You were engaged in the act of trafficking minors across state or country borders for the purposes of sex or prostitution between 2000 and the present.
+
+CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MARRA
+
+- 19. You coerced Plaintiff into being a prostitute and remaining in prostitution.
+- 20. You are guilty of the following offenses against Jane Doe:
+- A. Procuring a minor for the purpose of prostitution as defined in F.S. 796.03;
+- B. Battery as defined by Florida Statutes.
+- C. Sexual Battery.
+- 21. You are moving significant financial assets overseas, outside of the direct territorial reach of the U.S. and Florida Courts.
+- 22. You are making asset transfers with the intent to defeat any judgment that might be entered against you in this or similar cases.
+- 23. You currently have the ability to post a bond of \$15 million to satisfy a judgment in this case without financial or other difficulty.
+
+## CONCLUSION
+
+For all these reasons, the Court should compel Epstein to answer the requests for admission or provide a particularized justification for his Fifth Amendment invocation with regard to each request. Counsel for Jane Doe have conferred with opposing counsel on the issues raised in this motion, and no resolution was possible.
+
+DATED July 10, 2009 Respectfully Submitted,
+
+s/ J. J.
+
+ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER Las Olas City Centre 401 East Las Olas Blvd., Suite 1650 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Telephone (954) 522-3456 Facsimile (954) 527-8663 Florida Bar No.: 542075 E-mail: bedwards@rra-law.com
+
+CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MARRia
+
+and
+
+Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice 332 S. 1400 E. Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Telephone: 801-585-5202 Facsimile: 801-585-6833 E-Mail: cassellp@law.utah.edu
+
+#### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
+
+I HEREBY CERTIFY that on July 10, 2009, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all parties on the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those parties who are not authorized to receive electronically filed Notices of Electronic Filing.
+
+> s/ J.
+
+CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MARRA~
+
+# SERVICE LIST
+
+Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Jaoldberaer@aawpa.com
+
+Robert D. Critton, Esq. rcritton@bciclaw.com
+
+Isidro Manual isidrogarcia@bellsouth.net
+
+Jack iph@searcylaw.com •
+
+Katherine Warthen Ezell KEzell@podhurst.com
+
+Michael James Pike MPike@bciclaw.com
+
+Paul G. Cassell cassellp@bcIclaw.com
+
+Richard Horace Willits lawyerswillits@aol.com
+
+Robert C. Josefsberg rjosefsberg@podhurst.com
+
+Adam D. Horowitz ahorowitz@sexabuseattorney.com
+
+Stuart S. Mermelstein ssm@sexabuseattorney.com
+
+William J. Berger wberger@rra-law.com
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740128/EFTA02740128.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740128/EFTA02740128.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3ccd4dda676d60531388fc5dd14567241d95de8f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740128/EFTA02740128.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,559 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740128.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 10,
+  "chars": 9100,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.84,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            201.96000000000004,
+            106.92
+          ],
+          [
+            410.47198486328125,
+            106.92
+          ],
+          [
+            410.47198486328125,
+            135.43353271484375
+          ],
+          [
+            201.96000000000004,
+            135.43353271484375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "PLAINTIFF JANE DOE'S MOTION TO COMPEL ANSWERS TO PLAINTFF'S \nFIRST REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO DEFENDANT",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            111.384,
+            506.25
+          ],
+          [
+            538.064697265625,
+            506.25
+          ],
+          [
+            538.064697265625,
+            535.5635375976562
+          ],
+          [
+            111.384,
+            535.5635375976562
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "SPECIFIC REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            190.332,
+            464.93999999999994
+          ],
+          [
+            421.76513671875,
+            464.93999999999994
+          ],
+          [
+            421.76513671875,
+            480.54998779296875
+          ],
+          [
+            190.332,
+            480.54998779296875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CONCLUSION",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            263.772,
+            409.86
+          ],
+          [
+            349.7690734863281,
+            409.86
+          ],
+          [
+            349.7690734863281,
+            425.41998291015625
+          ],
+          [
+            263.772,
+            425.41998291015625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            225.216,
+            285.92999999999995
+          ],
+          [
+            387.3754577636719,
+            285.92999999999995
+          ],
+          [
+            387.3754577636719,
+            301.29998779296875
+          ],
+          [
+            225.216,
+            301.29998779296875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "SERVICE LIST",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 9,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            261.936,
+            106.11000000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            350.1988220214844,
+            106.11000000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            350.1988220214844,
+            122.04998779296875
+          ],
+          [
+            261.936,
+            122.04998779296875
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            43
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            22
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            18
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            37
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            19
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            19
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            39
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            20
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            19
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            43
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            22
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            15
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            61
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            31
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            14
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            61
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            31
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            41
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            21
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 9,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            63
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            32
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            14
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02740128"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740138/EFTA02740138.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740138/EFTA02740138.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c2f8e2c3a6dc9e7d7669d0adb9fe2fa1c2e6d017
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740138/EFTA02740138.md
@@ -0,0 +1,342 @@
+#### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 2,
+
+Plaintiff
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant
+
+JANE DOE NO. 4,
+
+Plaintiff
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant
+
+CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MARRA
+
+CASE NO: 08-CV-80232-MARRA
+
+CASE NO: 08-CV-80380-MARRA
+
+CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MARRAM=
+
+JANE DOE NO. 5,
+
+Plaintiff
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant
+
+JANE DOE NO. 6.
+
+Plaintiff
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant
+
+JANE DOE NO. 7,
+
+Plaintiff
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant
+
+CASE NO: 08-CV-80381-MARRA
+
+CASE NO: 08-CV-80994-MARRA
+
+CASE NO: 08-CV-80993-MARRA
+
+CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MARRAi
+
+CASE NO: 08-CV-80811-MARRA
+
+C.M.A.,
+
+Plaintiff
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant
+
+JANE DOE, CASE NO. 08-CV-80893-CIV-MARRA/
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+Vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN, et al.
+
+Defendant.
+
+DOE II, CASE NO: 09-CV-80469-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN, et al.
+
+Defendants.
+
+CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MARRIa
+
+JANE DOE NO. 101, CASE NO: 09-CV-80591-MARRa
+
+Plaintiff
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant
+
+JANE DOE NO. 102, CASE NO: 09-CV-80656-MARRa
+
+Plaintiff
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant
+
+### PLAINTIFF JANE DOE'S MOTION TO COMPEL ANSWERS TO PLAINTFF'S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES
+
+Plaintiff Jane Doe, hereby moves this Court for an order compelling defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, to answer her first set of interrogatories or, in the alternative, to prove that his invocation of his Fifth Amendment privilege is proper.
+
+Jane Doe has propounded 23 interrogatories, including such straightforward requests as:
+
+Interrogatory No. 2: Describe financial assets that are under your control, directly or indirectly, including interests in corporations or other business entities.
+
+CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MARRA
+
+Interrogatory No. 3: Describe which financial assets listed in your answer to interrogatory #2 are located outside the 50 states of the United States and where they are located.
+
+Interrogatory No. 4: Describe your net worth, including income and expenses for 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008.
+
+Interrogatory No. 5: Describe any real property in which you have a total or partial interest, either directly or indirectly.
+
+Interrogatory No. 7: Describe any transfer of assets under your control, either directly or indirectly, to locations outside the 50 United States in 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008.
+
+Interrogatory No. 8: Describe, with specificity, your travel to locations outside the 50 states of the United states in 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008, including your dates of travel, location to which you traveled and persons that accompanied you in each such travel.
+
+Interrogatory No. 11: Have you heard or do you know about any statement or remark (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of any party to this lawsuit, other than yourself, concerning any issue in this lawsuit? If so, state the name and address of each person who heard or read it, and the date, time, place and substance of each statement or remark.
+
+Interrogatory No. 12: Do you intend to elicit testimony of witnesses other than Plaintiff regarding any statements she has ever made? If so, what statements do you
+
+CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MARRA
+
+intend to produce through testimony? Through which witness do you intend to elicit such statement? And for what purpose do you intend to admit such statement?
+
+Interrogatory No. 23: State the facts upon which you rely for each affirmative defense in your answer.
+
+In response to these interrogatories, Epstein has given the following response (with only slight variations on the overbreadth objection):
+
+Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the interrogatories as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any questions relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, Defendant objects as the interrogatory is so overbroad and, thus, seeks information that is neither relevant to the subject matter of the pending action nor does it appear reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.
+
+This Court should order Epstein to answer all of these interrogatories or, in the alternative, prove that his Fifth Amendment invocations are valid. It is for the court, not the claimant, to determine whether the hazard of incrimination is justified. United States v. Argomaniz, 925 F.2d 1349, 1355 (11th Cir. 1991). "A court must make a particularized inquiry, deciding, in connection with each specific area that the questioning party wishes to explore, whether or not the privilege is well-founded." Id. Typically this is done in an in camera proceeding wherein the person asserting the privilege is given the opportunity "to substantiate his claims of the privilege and the
+
+CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MARRA
+
+district court is able to consider the questions asked and the documents requested by the summons." Id.
+
+Here Epstein has made boilerplate invocation of the Fifth Amendment to each and every question propounded by Jane Doe, including for example the question: Do you intend to elicit testimony of witnesses other than Plaintiff regarding any statements she has ever made? This obviously is not an interrogatory with Fifth Amendment implications. Nor is Epstein's claim that this interrogatory is somehow "overbroad" or "not calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence" even facially plausible.
+
+Epstein's "cut and paste" response to the interrogatories also blatantly disregards the requirements for invoking privilege under the Court's local rules. Local rule 26.1.G very specifically requires the preparation of a privilege log with respect to all documents and oral communications (among other things) that are withheld on the basis of privilege. Epstein has failed to prepare such a log, making it impossible for Jane Doe to effectively challenge his generic assertions. The Local Rules do not permit this tactic, and Epstein should be (at a minimum) promptly required to produce a privilege log.
+
+For all these reasons, the Court should compel Epstein to answer the interrogatories or provide a particularized justification for his Fifth Amendment invocation with regard to each request.
+
+It should be noted that the only two grounds on which Epstein can refuse to answer the interrogatories are either proof of a valid Fifth Amendment privilege or proof
+
+CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MARRIa
+
+of a valid overbreadth objection. These are the only two objections Epstein has asserted. As a result, any other objections to production are deemed waived. See Local Rule 26.1G.3.(a) ("Any ground [for an objection] not stated in an objection within the time provided by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, or any extensions thereof, shall be waived.").
+
+## SPECIFIC INTERROGATORIES
+
+For the convenience of the court — and in compliance with Local Rule 26.1 H (party filing motion to compel shall list specific requests in succession) — Jane Doe's interrogatories are as follows:
+
+- 1. What is the full name and Florida address of the person answering these interrogatories, and, if applicable, the person's official position or relationship with the party to whom the interrogatories are directed?
+
+[Note: This is the only interrogatory Epstein answered in any way.]
+
+- 2. Describe financial assets that are under your control, directly or indirectly, including interests in corporations or other business entities.
+
+Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the interrogatories as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any questions relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, Defendant objects as the interrogatory is so overbroad and, thus, seeks information that is neither relevant to the subject matter of the pending action nor does it appear reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.
+
+1. 3. Describe which financial assets listed in your answer to interrogatory #2 that are located outside the 50 states of the United States and where they are located.
+
+Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the interrogatories as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any questions relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, Defendant objects as the interrogatory is so overbroad and, thus, seeks information that is neither relevant to the subject matter of the pending action nor does it appear reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.
+
+1. 4. Describe your net worth, including income and expenses for 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008.
+
+Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the interrogatories as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any questions relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, Defendant objects as the interrogatory is so overbroad and, thus, seeks information that is neither relevant to the subject matter of the pending action nor does it appear reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.
+
+1. 5. Describe any real property in which you have a total or partial ownership interest, either directly or indirectly.
+
+Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the interrogatories as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled
+
+me that I cannot provide answers to any questions relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, Defendant objects as the interrogatory is so overbroad and, thus, seeks information that is neither relevant to the subject matter of the pending action nor does it appear reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.
+
+1. 6. Describe which real properties listed in your answer to interrogatory #5 are located outside the 50 United States and where the properties are located.
+
+Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the interrogatories as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any questions relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, Defendant objects as the interrogatory is so overbroad and, thus, seeks information that is neither relevant to the subject matter of the pending action nor does it appear reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.
+
+1. 7. Describe any transfer of assets under [y]our control, either directly or indirectly, to locations outside the 50 United States in 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008.
+
+Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the interrogatories as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any questions relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my
+
+constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, Defendant objects as the interrogatory is so overbroad and, thus, seeks information that is neither relevant to the subject matter of the pending action nor does it appear reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.
+
+1. 8. Describe, with specificity, your travel to locations outside the 50 states of the United States in 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008, including your dates of travel, location to which you traveled and persons that accompanied you in each such travel.
+
+Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the interrogatories as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any questions relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, Defendant objects as the interrogatory is so overbroad and, thus, seeks information that is neither relevant to the subject matter of the pending action nor does it appear reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.
+
+1. 9. List each telephone number used by you or your assistants to call minor females directly, or indirectly, for the purpose of scheduling a massage to take place at your house located at 358 El Brillo Way, West Palm Beach (includes landlines, cell phones, and private jet or airplane lines). For each cell phone, list the provider.
+
+Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the interrogatories as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any questions relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my
+
+constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution.
+
+1. 10. List the last known name, address and telephone numbers of all persons that may have any knowledge about any of the allegations in the Complaint, including, but not limited to, friends, acquaintances, employees, or others to whom you have spoken about the subject matter which forms the basis of this Complaint or who have observed such activity.
+
+Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the interrogatories as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any questions relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, Defendant objects as the interrogatory is so overbroad and, thus, seeks information that is neither relevant to the subject matter of the pending action nor does it appear reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. The scope of the information is so overbroad that it also includes information that is attorney-client and work-product privileged.
+
+1. 11. Have you heard or do you know about any statement or remark (verbal or written) made by or on behalf of any party to this lawsuit, other than yourself, concerning any issue in this lawsuit? If so, state the name and address of each person who made the statement or remark, the name and address of each person who heard or read it, and the date, time, place and substance of each statement or remark.
+
+Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the interrogatories as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit,, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any questions relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate
+
+the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, Defendant objects as the interrogatory is so overbroad and, thus, seeks information that is neither relevant to the subject matter of the pending action nor does it appear reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. The scope of the information is so overbroad that it also includes information that is attorney-client and work-product privileged.
+
+1. 12. Do you intend to elicit testimony of witnesses other than Plaintiff regarding any statements she has ever made? If so, what statements do you intend to produce through testimony? Through which witness do you intend to elicit such statement? And for what purpose do you intend to admit such statement? Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the interrogatories as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any questions relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, Defendant objects as the interrogatory is so overbroad and, thus, seeks information that is neither relevant to the subject matter of the pending action nor does it appear reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Additionally, work-product and attorney-client.
+2. 13. Are you transferring, or do you plan to, or might you transfer money or assets out of the country during the course of this litigation?
+
+Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the interrogatories as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any questions relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, Defendant objects as the interrogatory is so overbroad and,
+
+thus, seeks information that is neither relevant to the subject matter of the pending action nor does it appear reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.
+
+1. 14. Describe each property owned by you, including location, approximate value, and whether there is a mortgage on the property and the amount of any such mortgage.
+
+Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the interrogatories as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any questions relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, Defendant objects as the interrogatory is so overbroad and, thus, seeks information that is neither relevant to the subject matter of the pending action nor does it appear reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.
+
+1. 15. Describe with specificity the amount of money available to you in cash or that can be readily liquidated as such. Include the bank financial institution, holding company, or other location of this money and the name of the account.
+
+Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the interrogatories as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any questions relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, Defendant objects as the interrogatory is so overbroad and, thus, seeks information that is neither relevant to the subject matter of the pending action nor does it appear reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.
+
+16. State with as much specificity as possible when you met the Plaintiff, and including in your answer the following: (a) the circumstances and location of how and where you met (b) describe the nature of your relationship, (c) describe how many occasions she was with you at your residence located at 358 El Brillo Way in Palm Beach, Florida.
+
+Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the interrogatories as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any questions relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution.
+
+17. Provide the names, addresses, and phone numbers of all your current accountants, financial planners or money managers handling, or assisting in the handling, of your money or assets.
+
+Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the interrogatories as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any questions relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, Defendant objects as the interrogatory is so overbroad and, thus, seeks information that is neither relevant to the subject matter of the pending action nor does it appear reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.
+
+18. Did you ever ask the Plaintiff to introduce you to minor females and/or to bring minor females to your house in Palm Beach, Florida and if so, when did this occur, and what was she asked by you to do, and what did you tell her about the reason for her to bring these other minor girls?
+
+Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the interrogatories as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any questions relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution.
+
+1. 19. Did you ever engage in sexual activity of any kind whatsoever with the Plaintiff, and including in your answer what type of sexual activity took place, where it took place, and the dates or general timeframe when this activity occurred.
+
+Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the interrogatories as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any questions relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution.
+
+1. 20. Were there parameters or instructions by you to the Plaintiff as to the types of girls to bring to your Palm Beach, Florida house, including age, range, what they would be asked to do, body type or socio-economic background?
+
+Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the interrogatories as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any questions relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution.
+
+21. Describe any words or actions that you made to assure the Plaintiff that sexual activity with you was proper[] or appropriate?
+
+Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the interrogatories as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any questions relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution.
+
+22. Describe what age you thought the Plaintiff was when you first had sexual activity with her, including your reasons for that belief.
+
+Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the interrogatories as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any questions relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution.
+
+23. State the facts upon which you rely for each affirmative defense in your answer.
+
+Defendant is asserting specific legal objections to the interrogatories as well as his U.S. constitutional privileges. I intend to respond to all relevant questions regarding this lawsuit, however, my attorneys have counseled me that I cannot provide answers to any questions relevant to this lawsuit and I must accept this advice or risk losing my Sixth Amendment right to effective representation. Accordingly, I assert my federal constitutional rights under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments as guaranteed by United States Constitution. Drawing an adverse inference under these circumstances would unconstitutionally burden my exercise of my constitutional rights, would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. In addition to and without waiving his constitutional privileges, Defendant objects as the interrogatory is so overbroad and,
+
+CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MARRa
+
+thus, seeks information that is neither relevant to the subject matter of the pending action nor does it appear reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. No answer has yet been filed, so not applicable.
+
+# CONCLUSION
+
+For all these reasons, the Court should compel Epstein to answer the interrogatories or provide a particularized justification for his Fifth Amendment invocation with regard to each request. Epstein should also be required to produce a privilege log. Counsel for Jane Doe have conferred with opposing counsel on the issues raised in this motion, and no resolution was possible.
+
+DATED July 10, 2009
+
+Respectfully Submitted,
+
+J.
+
+ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER Las Olas City Centre 401 East Las Olas Blvd., Suite 1650 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Telephone (954) 522-3456 Facsimile (954) 527-8663 Florida Bar No.: 542075 E-mail: bedwards@rra-law.com
+
+and
+
+Paul G. Cassell Pro Hac Vice 332 S. 1400 E. Salt Lake City, UT 84112 Telephone: 801-585-5202 Facsimile: 801-585-6833 E-Mail: cassello@law.utah.edu
+
+CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MARRa
+
+### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
+
+I HEREBY CERTIFY that on July 10, 2009, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all parties on the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those parties who are not authorized to receive electronically filed Notices of Electronic Filing.
+
+> s/ J. J.
+
+CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MARRa
+
+### SERVICE LIST Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Jaoldberaer@aawpa.com
+
+Robert D. Critton, Esq. rcritton@bcIclaw.com
+
+Isidro Manual isidrooarcia@bellsouth.net
+
+Jack iph@searcylaw.com •
+
+Katherine Warthen Ezell KEzell@podhurst.com
+
+Michael James Pike MPike@bciclaw.com
+
+Paul G. Cassell cassellp@bciclaw.com
+
+Richard Horace Willits lawyerswillits@aol.com
+
+Robert C. Josefsberg rjosefsberg@podhurst.com
+
+Adam D. Horowitz ahorowitz@sexabuseattorney.com
+
+Stuart S. Mermelstein ssm@sexabuseattorney.com
+
+William J. Berger wberger@rra-law.com
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740138/EFTA02740138.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740138/EFTA02740138.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2289b9007a447f818768c1e52b606b8b83180bfa
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740138/EFTA02740138.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,839 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740138.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 20,
+  "chars": 36026,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 13.81,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            201.348,
+            106.92
+          ],
+          [
+            410.47198486328125,
+            106.92
+          ],
+          [
+            410.47198486328125,
+            135.43353271484375
+          ],
+          [
+            201.348,
+            135.43353271484375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "PLAINTIFF JANE DOE'S MOTION TO COMPEL ANSWERS TO PLAINTFF'S FIRST \nSET OF INTERROGATORIES",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            73.44,
+            451.1700000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            538.81298828125,
+            451.1700000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            538.81298828125,
+            480.54998779296875
+          ],
+          [
+            73.44,
+            480.54998779296875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "SPECIFIC INTERROGATORIES",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            215.42399999999998,
+            244.61999999999998
+          ],
+          [
+            397.0257568359375,
+            244.61999999999998
+          ],
+          [
+            397.0257568359375,
+            259.67999267578125
+          ],
+          [
+            215.42399999999998,
+            259.67999267578125
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CONCLUSION",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 17,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            263.772,
+            175.76999999999998
+          ],
+          [
+            349.7690734863281,
+            175.76999999999998
+          ],
+          [
+            349.7690734863281,
+            191.04998779296875
+          ],
+          [
+            263.772,
+            191.04998779296875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 18,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            225.82799999999997,
+            120.69
+          ],
+          [
+            387.0013122558594,
+            120.69
+          ],
+          [
+            387.0013122558594,
+            135.54998779296875
+          ],
+          [
+            225.82799999999997,
+            135.54998779296875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "SERVICE LIST \nJane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein \nUnited States District Court, Southern District of Florida",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 19,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            143.82,
+            119.88
+          ],
+          [
+            468.96051025390625,
+            119.88
+          ],
+          [
+            468.96051025390625,
+            163.67999267578125
+          ],
+          [
+            143.82,
+            163.67999267578125
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            43
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            22
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            19
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            43
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            22
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            19
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            39
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            20
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            20
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            45
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            23
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            16
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            49
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            65
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            33
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            67
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            34
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 9,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 10,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 11,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 12,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 13,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 14,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 15,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 16,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 17,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            65
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            33
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            9
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 18,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            13
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 19,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            63
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            32
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            13
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02740138"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740158/EFTA02740158.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740158/EFTA02740158.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5c14ef9b31703c3264c0e1f145201d7eeca3e49e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740158/EFTA02740158.md
@@ -0,0 +1,145 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA/JOHNSON
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 4, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRA/
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 5, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80381-MARRA/JOHNSON
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+c4If
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 6, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80994-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 7,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80993-MARRA/JOHNSON
+
+C.M.A.,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-MARRA
+
+JANE DOE, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80893-MARRA/
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. II, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80469-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 101, CASE NO.: 09-CV-80591-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 102, CASE NO.: 09-CV-80656-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## ORDER
+
+THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane Doe No. 102's Motion for an Order for the Preservation of Evidence and Incorporated Memorandum of Law (DE #114), filed May 26, 2009, and this court's order (DE #192). The parties having agreed and the Court having carefully considered the motion and being otherwise fully advised in the premises.
+
+It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiffs' Motion (DE # 114) is GRANTED as follows:
+
+A.1 Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and such employees and agents (currently under his control) and his attorneys are directed to take every reasonable step to preserve any evidence, resulting from the October 25, 2005 search of his home as set forth in this Court's order (DE #151-2; DE #20 in Case 9:08 -CV-80804-KAM) previously entered.
+
+A.2 Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and such employees and agents (currently under his control) and his attorneys are directed to take every reasonable step to preserve any evidence relevant to these cases that have been filed in federal court or that may lead to the discovery of admissible evidence relevant to these cases which includes, documents, data, and tangible things, including, writings; records; files; correspondence; digital or chemical process photographs (including negatives); reports; memoranda; calendars; diaries; minutes; electronic messages; voicemail; email; telephone message records or logs; computer and network activity logs; hard drives; backup data; removable computer storage media, such as tapes, disks, and cards; printouts; document image files; web pages; databases; spreadsheets; software; books; ledgers; journals; orders; invoices; bills; vouchers; checks; statements; worksheets; summaries; compilations; computations; charts; diagrams; graphic presentations; drawings; films; charts; video, phonographic, tape, or digital recordings or transcripts thereof; drafts; jottings; and notes. Information that serves to identify, locate, or link such material, such as file inventories, file folders, and indices, is also included. Specifically, Defendant must preserve the following evidence as defined herein: records of phone communications; records of domestic and international travel, including travel in Defendant's private airplanes; former and current employee records; tax returns; any document evidencing payment by Defendant of U.S. currency and/or merchandise to each person on the list provided by the United States Attorney's Office ("USAO list"); any evidence stored in Defendant's storage unit; all photographs of the interior and exterior of Defendant's Palm Beach residence as it appeared in 1998 through October 2005; any diary, log, memo pad, calendar, or other writing which reflected the date that each person on the USAO list visited Defendant's residence; any diary or document wherein each person on the USAO list wrote regarding any visit(s) to Defendant's residence; all documents sent by the Palm Beach Police Department ("PBPD"), the FBI, the USAO, or the Palm Beach State Attorney's Office ("PBSAO") to the defendant; and all computers used by Defendant and/or such agents and employees (currently under his control) to the extent the computers have evidence relating to these cases. The time period for the preservation of evidence shall be 1998 - 2002 as it relates to Jane Doe 102; and 2002 through October 25, 2005 as it relates to other persons on the USAO list.
+
+B. "Evidence" is defined as any document or information that is in the possession, custody or control of the defendant as of the date of this order and that is relevant to these cases or that may lead to the discovery of evidence relevant to these cases. The duty to preserve evidence extends to documents, data, and tangible things in the possession, custody, and/or control of Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, and such employees or agents (currently under his control) or attorneys who possess materials reasonably anticipated to be subject to discovery in these actions. Counsel for the Defendant shall be directly responsible only to the extent they are in possession or control of evidence. Counsel shall provide a copy of this Order to the Defendant and to those employees or agents whom defense counsel knows or has reason to believe may have evidence.
+
+C. "Preservation" is to be interpreted broadly to accomplish the goal of maintaining the integrity of all documents, data, and tangible things reasonably anticipated to be subject to discovery in these actions under Rules 26, 45, and 56(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
+
+D. If an objection or privilege is raised, the parties may raise the issue with this Court in a timely fashion and shall preserve the evidence in question pending resolution by the Court. An agreement to preserve evidence and this Order is not a waiver of any existing or future right to object to production or any constitutional or evidentiary basis.
+
+E. The parties, without leave of Court, may agree in writing that certain documents or categories of evidence need not be preserved as otherwise required by this Order. If such agreement is reached, such agreement is effective upon signing and without further order of this Court.
+
+F. If this Court determines that evidence has been wrongfully destroyed or lost in violation of this Order, it may impose appropriate sanctions based upon motion and an evidentiary hearing, if necessary.
+
+G. Each party shall bear its own costs for complying with this Order.
+
+DONE AND ORDERED inill at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this of , 2009.
+
+> KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Court Judge
+
+Copies to: All counsel of record
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740158/EFTA02740158.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740158/EFTA02740158.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b44d1a0b3dfbe7778b4872ed0c484420b3821204
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740158/EFTA02740158.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,317 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740158.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 7,
+  "chars": 6757,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.43,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            74.2315673828125
+          ],
+          [
+            406.68707275390625,
+            74.2315673828125
+          ],
+          [
+            406.68707275390625,
+            101.9830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            101.9830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "ORDER",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            282.744,
+            156.32999999999998
+          ],
+          [
+            332.2633361816406,
+            156.32999999999998
+          ],
+          [
+            332.2633361816406,
+            170.60302734375
+          ],
+          [
+            282.744,
+            170.60302734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            43
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            22
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            22
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            43
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            22
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            22
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            39
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            22
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            20
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            44
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            23
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            47
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            24
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            45
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            23
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            23
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02740158"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740165/EFTA02740165.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740165/EFTA02740165.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7a573f29efd42114728b2c0851fb934f8c81c807
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740165/EFTA02740165.md
@@ -0,0 +1,216 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/MMI
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRAM=
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 4, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRA/JOHNSON
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 5, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80381-MARRA/
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 6, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80994-MARRA/JOHNSON
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 7,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80993-MARRA
+
+C.M.A.,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-8081 l-MARRA/
+
+JANE DOE, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80893-MARRAMM
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. If CASE NO.: 08-CV-80469-MARRA J
+
+Plaintiff
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 101, CASE NO.: 09-CV-80591-MARRA/JOHNSON
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 102,
+
+Plaintiff;
+
+vs.
+
+CASE NO.: 09-CV-80656-MAR
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+\_\_\_\_\_/
+
+**DEFENDANT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S, NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE  
+WITH COURT ORDER (DE #192)**
+
+Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, by and through his undersigned attorneys, in compliance with the Court's Order (DE #192) hereby submits a proposed order on Plaintiff's Motion for Protective Order (DE #114), and states:
+
+1. The Court granted the Plaintiff's Motion for an Order for Preservation of Evidence, (DE #192). However the Court determined that the Plaintiff's proposed order was overly broad and directed that the parties attempt to submit an agreed order. The parties have worked diligently to provide an agreed order, and have reached common ground on many sections. However, we were unable to finalize an order.
+
+Therefore, Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, is providing his proposed order attached as **Exhibit A**. Plaintiff's counsel will be serving their proposed order.
+
+2. Should the Court allow, counsel for the parties are willing to provide the Court a brief joint statement setting forth the differences in their proposed order and their respective positions. However, neither party, absent this Court's permission believed it was appropriate.
+
+**Certificate of Service**
+
+![]()I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court
+
+using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record identified on the following Service List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on thisg\_4fray o , 2009.
+
+Respectfully f.mitted,
+
+By:
+
+ROBER CRITTON, JR., ESQ.
+
+Florida r ar No. 224162
+
+rcr
+
+MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ.
+
+Florida Bar #617296
+
+mpike®bciclaw.com
+
+BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN
+
+515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400
+
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+
+561/842-2820 Phone
+
+561/515-3148 Fax
+
+(Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein)
+
+## Certificate of Service Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey E stein Case No. 08-CV-80119-MARRA/
+
+Smart S. Mennelstein, Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A. 18205 Biscayne Boulevard Suite 2218 Miami, FL 33160 305-931-2200 Fax: 305-931-0877 ssmOsexabuseattomcv.com
+
+ahorowitzasexabuseattomey.com Counsel for Plaintiffs in Related Cases Nos. 08-80069, 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80993, 08-80994
+
+Richard Horace Willits, Esq. Richard H. Willits, P.A. 2290 10th Avenue North Suite 404 Lake Worth, FL 33461 561-582-7600 Fax: 561-588-8819 Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-80811 reelrhwQhotrnail.com
+
+Jack Scarola, Esq. Jack P. Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 561-686-6300 Fax: 561-383-9424 jsxasear \_ylaw.corri inlasearcvlaw.com Counsel for Plaintiff C.M.A.
+
+Bruce Reinhart, Esq. Bruce E. Reinhart, P.A. 250 S. Australian Avenue Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561-202-6360 Fax: 561-828-0983 ecfabrucereinhartlaw. m Counsel for Defendant
+
+Brad Esq. Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler 401 East Las Olas Boulevard Suite 1650 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: 954-522-3456 Fax: 954-527-8663 bedwardserra-law.com Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 0840893
+
+Paul G. Cassell, Esq. Pro Hac Vice 332 South 1400 E, Room 101 Salt Lake City, UT 84112 801-585-5202 801-585-6833 Fax cassellpRlaw.utah,edu Co-counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe
+
+Isidro M. =, Esq. Law Firm, P.A. 224 Datura Street, Suite 900 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561-832-7732 561-832-7137 F isidrogarcia@bellsouth.net Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 0840469
+
+Robert C. Joscfsbcrg, Esq. Katherine W. Ezell, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 25 West Flagler Street, Suite 800 Miami, FL 33130 305 358-2800 Fax: 305 358-2382 riosefsberzeoodhurst.com kezellapodhurst.corn Counsel for Plaintiffs in Related Cases Nos. 09-80591
+
+and 09-80656
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012
+
+Theodore J. Leopold, Esq.
+
+Spencer T. Kuvin, Esq.
+
+Ricci-Leopold, P.A.
+
+2925 PGA Blvd., Suite 200
+
+Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410
+
+561.684-6500
+
+Fax: 561-515-2610
+
+Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-08804
+
+acavinOxiceilaw.com
+
+tleopold®riccilaw.com
+
+561-659-8300
+
+Fax: 561-835-8691
+
+incsafabellsouth.net
+
+Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740165/EFTA02740165.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740165/EFTA02740165.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..522fe075cdf6ca712e153f7d0cb9cb3f6cc21222
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740165/EFTA02740165.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,367 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740165.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 7,
+  "chars": 5314,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 5.92,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            205.02,
+            76.14
+          ],
+          [
+            406.71099853515625,
+            76.14
+          ],
+          [
+            406.71099853515625,
+            107.2330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            205.02,
+            107.2330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "DEFENDANT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S, NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE WITH COURT ORDER (DE #192)",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            122.4,
+            173.34
+          ],
+          [
+            487.76400000000007,
+            173.34
+          ],
+          [
+            487.76400000000007,
+            201.69
+          ],
+          [
+            122.4,
+            201.69
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Certificate of Service",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            260.1,
+            641.52
+          ],
+          [
+            354.34799999999996,
+            641.52
+          ],
+          [
+            354.34799999999996,
+            654.48
+          ],
+          [
+            260.1,
+            654.48
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Certificate of Service \nJane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey E stein \nCase No. 08-CV-80119-MARRA/",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            188.496,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            392.9455261230469,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            392.9455261230469,
+            128.465087890625
+          ],
+          [
+            188.496,
+            128.465087890625
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            41
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            21
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            21
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            43
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            22
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            21
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            41
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            22
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            21
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            41
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            21
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            18
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            38
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            18
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            15
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            177
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            87
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            11
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            31
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            16
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            14
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02740165"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740172/EFTA02740172.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740172/EFTA02740172.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4b08ff89203d7d1c100544f1959aba885e79cd10
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740172/EFTA02740172.md
@@ -0,0 +1,87 @@
+## The Psychological Trauma Center
+
+a division of Preventive Psychiatry Associates Medical Group, inc.
+
+Medical Director: Gilbert W. Kliman, M. D.
+
+2105 Divisadcro St., San Francisco, CA 94115
+
+Phone (415)292.7119 Fax (415)749-2802
+
+1Y1VW.ecinl ochgrantl
+
+Forensic Child Psychiatric Evaluations. Life Care Plans & Testimony
+
+## DECLARATION OF GILBERT KLIMAN, M. D.
+
+June 4, 2009
+
+## RE: EXPECTATION OF HARM FROM DISCLOSING THE PLAINTIFFS' IDENTITIES IN DOES V JEFFREY EPSTEIN
+
+- 1. I, Gilbert W. Kliman, M.D., of 2105 Divisadero Street, San Francisco, California, CA. Physicians License G55912, declare the following under penalty of perjury:
+- 2. I have been retained by plaintiffs' law firm, Mermelstein & Horowitz, to give expert testimony. If called as a witness, I would testify truthfully and competently concerning my psychiatric findings about each of the plaintiffs' alleged experiences of sexual abuse, and the enduring effects that I find each of the young women have suffered as a direct result of the sexual acts perpetrated by the defendant.
+- 3. I have been asked to respond to the Defense motion, which requests that some of the plaintiffs, who are now adults, should be publicly named. It is my opinion that involuntary public disclosure will result in the plaintiffs experiencing revictimization, albeit by a justice system that is designed to protect them. If their identities are released, the victims will be at-risk of having their personal lives scrutinized by friends, extended family, spouses, children, fellow students, employers and fellow employees, the media and general public. This type of exposure humiliates many victims and represents another betrayal of trust. Public exposure places the plaintiffs at further risk of stigmatization, shame and retraumatization.
+- 4. Due to traumatization the plaintiffs are arrested in their development, and even those who are now legally adults are arrested in part to adolescent aspects of psychology.
+- 5. The plaintiffs do not hold their heads high with pride for having been sexually controlled by Mr. Epstein. They hold their heads low with shame. The internal life of a typical adolescent, into late adolescence and early adult years in the best of circumstances, usually involves generous proportions of self-consciousness, shame, selfabsorption and self-doubt and self-blame about sexual acts.
+
+![](_page_0_Picture_12.jpeg)
+
+6. Clinically harmful levels of shame, self-consciousness, self-doubt and self-blame are even more prominent among victims of molestations than among the general population.
+
+7. Molested teenagers are particularly vulnerable to wrongful manipulations and special clinical harms from the experiences of shame and humiliation. In fact, shame and efforts to cope with it played an underlying role in the harm to each plaintiff. Each was lured into Mr. Epstein's sexual lair with the promise of overcoming bodily and sexual shame by earning money and bettering their lot in life. The defendant capitalized on their sexual naiveté, insecurities and effort to better themselves, and he worked hard to overcome their shame at his enlistment of them in his selfish gratifications.
+
+8. The defendant who wishes to make their identities public is one whom the criminal justice system has already determined is a person who has already committed a crime of child molestation. That surely means he has already exploited and manipulated the girls' state of adolescent sexuality, including their embarrassment, awkwardness and bodily self-consciousness. He perverted their nascent and developing moral structures by posing as a generous, avuncular mentor who could coach them about their bodies, sex and love.
+
+The exploitation of adolescent bodies, sex and love is – from a psychoanalytic point of view – an influence on the developing moral conscience of the children, as well as on their sexual urges. Now the ravaging of their internal and private moral conscience is intended by the perpetrator to be made a public ravaging.
+
+9. Among sexual trauma victims, the insidious and destructive persistence of shame, humiliation and associated self-blame is well-documented (Finkelhor and [REDACTED], 1985). Stigmatization, as experienced by a sexual trauma victim, has especially painful and pathologic consequences. Shame lingers and becomes integrated within the adolescent victim's malleable emerging identity, character structure and self image. Moral clarity is distorted. Perceptions of self-blame and guilt are magnified. The impact of shame lends to cultivating a self image of being "spoiled goods."
+
+10. Stigmatization following sexual trauma results in long-term risks that can negatively shape multiple facets of adult development: sexual, emotional, interpersonal and vocational. Stigmatization, which is generally to be avoided among psychiatric patients, increases risks among those – as in our plaintiffs as a group – who experience clinical depression and self-destructive behaviors: drug use, criminal activity, even prostitution.
+
+Stigmatization following abuse is associated with delinquency due to increased anger and affiliation with deviant peers (Feiring et al., 2007).
+
+11. Shame and guilt are important dimensions of both complex and single event, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Symptoms of shame are associated with feelings of helplessness and powerlessness, which each of the plaintiffs endorsed experiencing in relation to Mr. Epstein.
+
+12. The DSM-IV-TR recognizes both powerlessness and helplessness as requisite parts of the traumatic experience in Criterion A for the diagnosis of posttraumatic stress disorder trauma ( Seligman, recent Past President of the American Psychological Association, coined relevant terms of "learned helplessness and "Loss of Personal Locus of Control." See Seligman, M.P. 1975: Helplessness, Depression, Development and Death. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco). The teenaged girls suffered the loss of personal locus of control to a much more experienced, sexually aggressive, powerful and dominant, manipulative perpetrator.
+
+13. Releasing names of the plaintiffs to the public will reenact experiences of powerlessness and helplessness in the face of a boundary violation. Repetition and reenactment represent central features of Criterion B in the DSM-IV-TR diagnosis of posttraumatic stress disorder trauma. In effect, release of their identity and public intrusion into their personal life represents a reenactment of the shame of sexual traumatization. Repetition and reenactment are central pathologies that afflict sexual trauma survivors.
+
+14. Victims of sexual abuse often rely upon some form of dissociation, splitting or denial, as a defensive means to manage overwhelming affects associated with the sexual trauma. Each of the plaintiff girls has employed some variation of this defense, both during the massages and then subsequently following disclosure of the abuse. Primitive, maladaptive responses of this nature will become additionally reinforced as a result of public disclosure.
+
+15. Another aspect of the plaintiffs' experience, which is recognized by DSM-IV-TR, is that the trauma was associated with human design factors (such as cruel intention to do harm, rape, torture). Trauma of this origin has a tendency to produce more "severe or long lasting" posttraumatic stress disorder than natural events (DSM IV TR p. 464). A policy of deliberate revelation of the names of the victims would reinforce the sense of design, pattern and policy of human intentions.
+
+16. Negative expectations about significant activities are noted in DSM-IV-TR, as part of Criterion C. Symptoms of foreshortened future are characteristic of a traumatized individual's clinical course (C4). They expect revictimization. They expect bad outcomes (C7) in their social, educational, vocational, relational plans. They are hypervigilant (Criterion D4) for further trauma, and this affects lifestyle choices and future planning. Hypervigilance is part of the arousal set of criteria. Public disclosure of the victims' identity will aggravate existing symptoms of hypervigilance.
+
+17. The DSM-IV-TR diagnostic category of "chronic" is justified for each of the plaintiffs. Scientific literature shows that the prognostic consequences of PTSD and residual effects may last for decades (U.S. Dept. of Health, 2005; Issues in Child Abuse Prevention Number 9 Autumn] 998: Long-term Effects of Child Sexual Abuse, Paul E Mullen and Jillian Fleming). The lasting impact upon character, identity and moral development will probably affect long-term influences upon adult development. It is more probable than not that stigmatization associated with public disclosure of the
+
+plaintiffs' identities will intensify the scope, nature and severity of the chronic symptom course.
+
+18. In addition to PTSD, shame and humiliation themselves have also been associated with causing clinical depression. Coexisting PTSD and clinical depression places the plaintiff's at increased risk for re-victimization and high risk sexual behaviors (e.g., sexually transmitted disease, premature pregnancy, rape) (Nelson, 2002), and at greater risk to victimize others (Filipas and Ullman, 2006; Desai, Centers for Disease Control, 2002) who are in their control. Studies have also shown that chronic symptoms of PTSD, in association with a single episode of Major Depressive Disorder, can produce lifetime adjustment difficulties, which include suicidality (Oquendo et al, 2005; Dube et al, CDC, 2001; Rohde, J. Am. Acad. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 2005). The plaintiffs will be additionally vulnerable to these clinical outcomes, if they suffer the stigmatization and humiliation associated with public disclosure of their identities.
+
+19. Alternative hypothesis: I have applied the evidence shown from examination and testing of the plaintiffs and relevant observations and information from other professionals while testing an alternative hypothesis: that no harm would result from public disclosure of the plaintiffs' identities. During the evaluations with the six plaintiffs, I used generally acceptable criteria for establishing whether a DSM-IV-TR disorder occurred. I established that there were provable and diagnosable injuries, primarily posttraumatic stress disorder and comorbid depression. Based upon these diagnostic signs, it is more probable than not, that exposing the plaintiff's identity to the public is not a trivial concern or one without substantial clinical repercussions. I believe that most child, adolescent and adult psychiatrists would share the opinion that additional psychiatric injury will result from such exposure.
+
+20. However, consider for the sake of argument, that my diagnostic conclusions are incorrect, notwithstanding having fulfilled standard psychiatric evaluation procedures of taking a history from multiple sources, videotaping and transcribing my initial interview, and reviewing available medical and legal documents. Even if this was the case, and my diagnostic conclusions were faulty, I believe that multiple experts, even those who may now propose publication of the victims' names, would still come to a conclusion that the plaintiffs suffered sexual abuse, and in some cases, multiple acts of ongoing abuse, at the hands of Jeffery Epstein. Even without developing a subsequent disorder, there is much clinical evidence and scientific literature showing likelihood of substantial psychiatric harm to these sexually abused plaintiffs.
+
+21. To form these conclusions, I have used my extensive experience in forming these opinions. That experience is both as a treating child psychiatrist and separately as a forensic psychiatrist. I have treated hundreds of minor patients, as well as additionally evaluated hundreds of children and adolescents who have suffered sexual abuse. I have made long term followups of many of the children and have treated many adults who have been molested as adolescents. It is my opinion, with a reasonably high degree of medical certainty that the defense motion to allow public disclosure of the plaintiffs' identities is clinically and ethically a wrongful plan. The act of revealing their identities against their wishes places the plaintiffs at risk, in the best of circumstances, of suffering
+
+an aggravation of existing diagnostic concerns. It is more probable than not that releasing personal identities will [REDACTED] an exacerbation and magnification of symptoms lending to increased risk of revictimization and retraumatization.
+
+I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing statements are true and correct, and that this declaration was executed at San Francisco, California on June 4, 2009.
+
+Sincerely,
+
+![]()Gilbert Kliman, M.D.
+
+Distinguished Life Fellow, American Psychiatric Association  
+Senior Fellow, American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry  
+[REDACTED] Brockman Award Holder, for Distinguished Lifetime Contributions to Psychoanalysis and Psychiatry, bestowed by the American College of Psychoanalysis and Psychiatry
+
+![](_page_4_Picture_22.jpeg)
+
+State of California, City & County of San Francisco  
+Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before me on this  
+21 day of June 2009, by Gilbert Kliman  
+proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence  
+to be the person[e] who appeared before me.
+
+![]()
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740172/EFTA02740172.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740172/EFTA02740172.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d0aaf29195e6ad0f3ed12decf0bff003fc66c83f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740172/EFTA02740172.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,271 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740172.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 5,
+  "chars": 13405,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 10.57,
+  "image_assets": [
+    "_page_0_Picture_12.jpeg",
+    "_page_4_Picture_22.jpeg"
+  ],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "The Psychological Trauma Center",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            221.293,
+            94.076
+          ],
+          [
+            395.3962097167969,
+            94.076
+          ],
+          [
+            395.3962097167969,
+            108.853515625
+          ],
+          [
+            221.293,
+            108.853515625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "DECLARATION OF GILBERT KLIMAN, M. D.",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            183.28699999999998,
+            231.135
+          ],
+          [
+            434.3980407714844,
+            231.135
+          ],
+          [
+            434.3980407714844,
+            245.7335205078125
+          ],
+          [
+            183.28699999999998,
+            245.7335205078125
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "RE: EXPECTATION OF HARM FROM DISCLOSING THE PLAINTIFFS' IDENTITIES \nIN DOES V JEFFREY EPSTEIN",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            100.532,
+            296.015
+          ],
+          [
+            458.90325927734375,
+            296.015
+          ],
+          [
+            458.90325927734375,
+            323.8170471191406
+          ],
+          [
+            100.532,
+            323.8170471191406
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            79
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            39
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Picture",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            16
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            89
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            44
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            91
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            46
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            19
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "Picture",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02740172"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740172/_page_0_Picture_12.jpeg b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740172/_page_0_Picture_12.jpeg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b0ae20053cde1da3e192b76ba4b12e8f3566fd13
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740172/_page_0_Picture_12.jpeg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:bf589ccc822e6a0fef3456c30343ccee8a841b3a6fea715c4080278969ef9b19
+size 7899
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740172/_page_4_Picture_22.jpeg b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740172/_page_4_Picture_22.jpeg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..755290fb00245f121f75c628e876b85b0fadf8c5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740172/_page_4_Picture_22.jpeg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:10c017e4802fa735088016dfa18ef88ac15d27baae565033fd091b6b449baad9
+size 11532
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740177/EFTA02740177.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740177/EFTA02740177.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fce68eb77904d6cbeaf9112b6f65ae8bc0db0633
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740177/EFTA02740177.md
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+## DECLARATION OF JANE DOE NO. 4
+
+I, S, state as follows:
+
+1. I am the Plaintiff identified as Jane Doe No. 4 in this lawsuit.
+
+2. During the past week, three investigators working on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein contacted the office of my former employer, Florida Realty, on three separate occasions.
+
+3. During the contacts, the investigators asked my former employer personal questions about me, including whom I am dating and how they can contact my ex-boyfriend. The investigators obtained the name of my ex-boyfriend from my former employer and have been repeatedly contacting a former co-worker to get the telephone number of my ex-boyfriend. Once they obtained the number of my ex-boyfriend, they have repeatedly contact him, asking very personal questions about my relationship with him, as well as my current relationship, employment, and residence.
+
+4. None of the individuals whom the investigators have contacted or attempted to contact knew that I am <sup>a</sup>plaintiff in achildhood sexual abuse lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein, but now they are asking me questions about it.
+
+5. I am worried that Jeffrey Epstein will continue to send investigators to speak with people I know who do not know that I am aPlaintiff in this lawsuit. I am concerned that the investigators will ask these people very personal questions about my life and disclose that I am <sup>a</sup> Plaintiff in a sexual abuse lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein. It could cause problems in my social circle and with my future employment and educational opportunities if people find out that I am <sup>a</sup>plaintiff in achildhood sexual abuse suit against Jeffrey Epstein.
+
+<sup>I</sup>declare under penalty of perjury the foregoing to be true and correct.
+
+![](_page_0_Picture_9.jpeg)
+
+Dated this 11day of "IAA V , 2009
+
+![](_page_1_Picture_2.jpeg)
+
+illa a/Ica/ J Doe No. 4
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740177/EFTA02740177.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740177/EFTA02740177.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7ae6291a4b8ceeb77d90faa7ff6e2051def4e5f9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740177/EFTA02740177.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,131 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740177.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 2,
+  "chars": 1855,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 0.67,
+  "image_assets": [
+    "_page_0_Picture_9.jpeg",
+    "_page_1_Picture_2.jpeg"
+  ],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "DECLARATION OF JANE DOE NO. 4",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            211.48499999999996,
+            95.698
+          ],
+          [
+            427.6199035644531,
+            95.698
+          ],
+          [
+            427.6199035644531,
+            111.91800000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            211.48499999999996,
+            111.91800000000002
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            338
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Picture",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            11
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Picture",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02740177"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740177/_page_0_Picture_9.jpeg b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740177/_page_0_Picture_9.jpeg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d3a07308d4dbe9038b938728a225b272b2721288
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740177/_page_0_Picture_9.jpeg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:cffabc1ce2e475617117dcabea063a88da33d52f4da6f5cd6f2e9c56a59c50f4
+size 8562
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740177/_page_1_Picture_2.jpeg b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740177/_page_1_Picture_2.jpeg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..536ca2f0586dabd3d34e8c0384b1f5340361bb49
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740177/_page_1_Picture_2.jpeg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:c79b68044db12b491c52907055e2c22f1c0313448494ca5285867144827f2b1e
+size 4504
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740179/EFTA02740179.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740179/EFTA02740179.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2065a2cf1367986bf7d442b5fbf9e9be0eba02e6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740179/EFTA02740179.md
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+## DECLARATION OF JANE DOE NO. 6
+
+I, state as follows:
+
+I. I am the Plaintiff identified as Jane Doe No. 6 in this lawsuit.
+
+2. On July 9, 2009, an investigator came to the office of my former employer, A Affordable Auto Insurance, in Lake Worth, Florida.
+
+3. After the investigator left, I was contacted by my former employer and told that the investigator was asking personal questions about me.
+
+4. I am worried that Jeffrey Epstein will continue to send investigators to speak with other people I know who do not know that I am a Plaintiff in this lawsuit. I am concerned that the investigators will ask these people very personal questions about my life and disclose that I am a Plaintiff in a sexual abuse lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein.
+
+I declare under penalty of perjury the foregoing to be true and correct.
+
+Dated this22.day of , 2009
+
+![](_page_0_Picture_10.jpeg)
+
+a/ka/ Jane Doe N
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740179/EFTA02740179.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740179/EFTA02740179.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a13bc83cc6e8dd7be885297074ea0c3a4a789142
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740179/EFTA02740179.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,92 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740179.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 1,
+  "chars": 894,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 0.6,
+  "image_assets": [
+    "_page_0_Picture_10.jpeg"
+  ],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "DECLARATION OF JANE DOE NO. 6",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            201.064,
+            98.13099999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            414.388,
+            98.13099999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            414.388,
+            113.53999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            201.064,
+            113.53999999999999
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            35
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            18
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Picture",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02740179"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740179/_page_0_Picture_10.jpeg b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740179/_page_0_Picture_10.jpeg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..437db7789fa540e002118ee7bfd07cad8fe268b1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740179/_page_0_Picture_10.jpeg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:ee39e7e787eddd0c2312be16dfa21963a819b11564d8a7241cdf4a4daa871fe0
+size 7743
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740180/EFTA02740180.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740180/EFTA02740180.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..859185266726c3ee6102a68378c2089d48e63210
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740180/EFTA02740180.md
@@ -0,0 +1,157 @@
+### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 4, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 5, CASE NO.: 08-CV-8038I-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+I
+
+JANE DOE NO. 6, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80994-MARRAMM
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 7, CASE NO.: 08- CV-80993-MARRA I
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+C.M.A., CASE NO.: 08- CV-80811 -MARRA I
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE, CASE NO.: 08- CV-80893-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN, et al.,
+
+Defendant.
+
+DOE II, CASE NO.: 08-CV- 80469-MARRA
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN et al.,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 101, CASE NO.: 08- CV-80591-MARRa
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+JANE DOE NO. 102, CASE NO.: 08- CV-80656-MARRA,
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## PLAINTIFFS JANE DOES' 2- 7 MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW
+
+Plaintiffs, Jane Does 2-7 ("Plaintiffs" or individually, "Plaintiff'), by and through undersigned counsel, hereby file Plaintiffs' Motion for Protective Order, pursuant to S.D.Fla.L.R. 7.1, and state as follows:
+
+I. Plaintiffs Jane Does 2-7 are proceeding with a Jane Doe pseudonym as this case involves facts of the utmost intimacy and there is a genuine risk of psychological harm if their identities are disclosed. See Exhibit "A" (Declaration of Gilbert Kliman, M.D.) (See also DE 144, Jane Does' 2-7 Response to Defendant's Motion to Compel Identity. et al.).
+
+2. Despite the obvious need for Plaintiffs to have their identities protected, Defendant Jeffrey Epstein has employed investigators who have made repeated contacts with exboyfriends, former employers, and others who know nothing of the underlying facts of the case. These investigators have contacted such nonparties asking them for extensive personal information about a Plaintiff, such as names and contact information of former boyfriends and other friends and acquaintances in the Plaintiff's community.
+
+3. The Defendant's repeated contacts with these nonparties is harassing and designed to intimidate the Plaintiffs. The purpose and intent of these contacts is to brand the Plaintiffs as alleged sexual abuse victims to their families, friends and communities.
+
+4. A Motion is pending in which this Court is being asked to determine whether and how Defendant may obtain discovery from nonparties. (DE 91, 144). Defendant's investigative efforts improperly circumvent the issues in the pending Motion, and only serve to highlight the need for this Court to implement appropriate protective measures to prevent Defendant from harassing, intimidating, and intruding unnecessarily into the personal lives of the Plaintiffs.
+
+5. While it is not unusual for a defendant to use appropriate means to obtain records from former employers and others referenced in a plaintiff's discovery responses, it is not customary for a defendant to retain private investigators to make personal contact with these individuals. Indeed, this practice is particularly inappropriate in a sexual abuse case where these nonparties are unaware of the underlying abuse. Plaintiffs have a well-grounded fear that the investigators will use the opportunity of their contacts with these nonparties to "out" the Plaintiffs' as alleged childhood sexual abuse victims of Jeffrey Epstein. (See Kliman Decl., Exh. "A" hereto).
+
+6. As an example of the investigators' intimidation tactics, three of Defendant's investigators recently called the former employer of Jane Doe 4 on repeated occasions over a two-day period, asking personal questions about her, including the name and telephone number of her ex-boyfriend. See Exhibit "B", Declaration of Jane Doe 4.
+
+7. Similarly, one of Defendant's investigators contacted the former employer of Jane Doe 6. See Exhibit "C", Declaration of Jane Doe 6.
+
+8. There is no basis for Defendant or his multiple investigators to make repeated personal contacts with former employers and ex-boyfriends to ask personal questions about a Plaintiff. It is apparent that these contacts are not designed to obtain relevant information, but rather are intended to intimidate the Plaintiffs and to reveal that they are childhood sexual abuse victims.
+
+9. Accordingly, Plaintiffs request the entry of a protective order that would prevent Defendant, his attorneys and investigators from making ex pane contacts concerning this litigation with nonparties who have no knowledge that a Plaintiff was a childhood sexual abuse victim of Jeffrey Epstein.
+
+10. This Court has discretion to enter a protective order designed to protect a party from, among other things, annoyance or embarrassment. Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(c). As set forth above, given the investigators' conduct, a protective order is appropriate to prevent unnecessary intrusion into the Plaintiffs' personal lives and divulgation of Plaintiffs in their communities as childhood sexual abuse victims.
+
+WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs Jane Does 2-7, respectfully request that this Court grant Plaintiffs' Motion for Protective Order, as follows: (i) order Defendant, his attorneys and investigators to cease making ex pane contacts with nonparties identified in plaintiffs' discovery
+
+responses, such as, for example, former employers; (ii) order Defendant, his attorneys and investigators to cease making ex pane contacts with nonparties found during the course of discovery or investigation who know the Plaintiff or live in her community, such as, for example, current and former boyfriends and family friends of the Plaintiffs; (iii) order Defendant, his attorneys and investigators to cease making ex pane contacts with nonparties who otherwise know one of the Plaintiffs personally but who are unaware that she is an alleged victim of childhood sexual abuse by Jeffrey Epstein; and (iv) grant all such other relief this Court deems just and appropriate.
+
+# CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL RULE 7.1.A.3
+
+Undersigned counsel has conferred with Defendant's counsel in a good faith effort to resolve the issues raised in this motion, and has been unable to do so, as Defendant's counsel has advised that Defendant opposes this motion.
+
+Dated: July 29, 2009 Respectfully submitted,
+
+By: sI Adam D. Horowitz Stuart S. Mermelstein (FL Bar No. 947245) ssm@sexabuseattorney.com Adam D. Horowitz (FL Bar No. 376980) ahorowitz@sexabuseattornev.com MERMELSTEIN & HOROWITZ, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiffs 18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160 Tel: (305) 931-2200 Fax: (305) 931-0877
+
+### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
+
+I hereby certify that on July 29, 2009, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day to all parties on the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those parties who are not authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing.
+
+/s/ Adam D. Horowitz
+
+### SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. ieoldberger@agwpa.com
+
+Robert D. Critton, Esq. rcritton@bciclaw.com
+
+James bedwards@rra-law.com
+
+Isidro Manuel isidrogarcia@bellsouth.net
+
+Jack jph@searcylaw.com U
+
+Katherine Warthen Ezell KEzell@vodhurst.com
+
+Michael James Pike MPike@bciclaw.com
+
+Paul G. Cassell cassellp@law.utah.edu
+
+Richard Horace Willits lawverwillits@aol.com
+
+Robert C. Josefsberg rjosefsberg@podhurst.com
+
+/s/ Adam D. Horowitz
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740180/EFTA02740180.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740180/EFTA02740180.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2e3e0dcee23059f3e55f74ae2f007b90950029fb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740180/EFTA02740180.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,432 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740180.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 8,
+  "chars": 7827,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.83,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            98.82
+          ],
+          [
+            405.95098876953125,
+            98.82
+          ],
+          [
+            405.95098876953125,
+            127.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            127.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "PLAINTIFFS JANE DOES' 2- 7 MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE \nORDER AND INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            135.864,
+            456.8399999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            476.66876220703125,
+            456.8399999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            476.66876220703125,
+            486.363037109375
+          ],
+          [
+            135.864,
+            486.363037109375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL RULE 7.1.A.3",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            129.744,
+            290.78999999999996
+          ],
+          [
+            483.1588134765625,
+            290.78999999999996
+          ],
+          [
+            483.1588134765625,
+            306.7330627441406
+          ],
+          [
+            129.744,
+            306.7330627441406
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            227.052,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            385.39947509765625,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            385.39947509765625,
+            85.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            227.052,
+            85.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "SERVICE LIST \nDOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN \nUnited States District Court, Southern District of Florida",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            156.67200000000003,
+            70.47
+          ],
+          [
+            455.16455078125,
+            70.47
+          ],
+          [
+            455.16455078125,
+            113.9830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            156.67200000000003,
+            113.9830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            22
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            24
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            22
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            15
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            52
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            54
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            19
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            56
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            11
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02740180"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740188/EFTA02740188.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740188/EFTA02740188.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7fcfbed8a139d335ad2937b462ffc3c1f6bd8f33
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740188/EFTA02740188.md
@@ -0,0 +1,779 @@
+### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CIV-80119-MARRAJ
+
+JANE DOE NO. 2,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+Related cases:
+
+08-80232, 08-08380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80993, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092
+
+### THIRD PARTY WITNESS, IGOR ZINOVIEW'S, MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW
+
+Third Party Witness, Igor Zinoview's, ("Mr. Zinoview") by and through his undersigned attorney, moves this Court pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c) for a protective order regarding his deposition and as grounds therefore would state:
+
+1. As reflected on the affidavit of Igor Zinoview, attached as Exhibit A, he works for Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein ("Mr. Epstein') as a driver and bodyguard. He did not know Mr. Epstein before November of 2005. He first became employed by Mr. Epstein in November of 2005.
+
+2. Additionally, Mr. Zinoview would testify as set forth on his affidavit, that at no time has he discussed with Mr. Epstein any issues involving Mr. Epstein's criminal case nor any of the cases or issues involved with civil plaintiffs.
+
+3. In many of the depositions, counsel for L.M. and E.W., has asked them as witnesses to assume certain facts about which they have no knowledge, and he then asks their opinions about certain facts. See Exhibit B -Epstein's Motion for Protective Order to Prohibit Inappropriate Deposition Questions.
+
+4. There is no information which Mr. Zinoview has relating to the facts and circumstances surrounding any of the pending civil cases, in that none of their allegations directed to Mr. Epstein extend beyond September of 2005. Therefore whatever information Mr. Zinoview may have, postdates that time.
+
+5. Regarding the scope of discovery, Judge Linnea noted in her October 28, 2009 Omnibus Order (DE #377), "[w]hile the scope of discovery is broad, it is not without limits. Washinaton v. & Williamson Tobacco 959 F.2d 1566, 1570 (11th Cir. 1992). ... Courts have long held that `[w]hile the standard of relevancy [in discovery] is a liberal one, it is not so liberal as to allow a party to roam in the shadow zones of relevancy and to explore matter (sic) which does not presently appear germane on the theory that it might conceivably become so.' Food Lion Inc. v. United Food & Commercial Workers Intern. Union, 103 F.3d 1007, 1012-13 (CA. D.C. 1997) (string cite omitted)."
+
+6. Rule 26(c), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, provides that, "[a] party or any person from whomn discovery is sought may move for a protective order in the court where the action is pending.... The court may, for good cause, issue an order to protect a party or person from annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden or expense, including one or more of the following: (A) forbidding the disclosure or discovery;"
+
+7. As set forth in his affidavit, Mr. Zinoview cannot possibly have any knowledge or information that is presently germane to this action. Accordingly, the Court should enter a protective order prohibiting his deposition.
+
+WHEREFORE, third-party witness moves this court for a protective order pursuant to Rule 26(c), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, that his deposition not take place or the questioning be limited.
+
+> By: JACK ALAN GOLDBERGER ESQ. Florida Bar No. 262013 jagesn@bellsouth.net
+
+# Rule 7.1 Certification
+
+I hereby certify that counsel for the movant has conferred or attempted to confer with opposing counsel in a good faith effort to resolve the discovery issues prior to the filing of this motion for protective order but has been unable to do so.
+
+# Certificate of Service
+
+I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record identified on the following Service List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on this day of November, 2009
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+By: JACK ALAN GOLDBERGER ESQ. Florida Bar No. 262013 iagesa@bellsouth.net Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 561-659-8300 Fax: 561-835-8691 (Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein)
+
+## Certificate of Service
+
+Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey E stein
+
+Case No. 08-CV-80119-MARRA/
+
+Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. Brad
+
+Adam D. Horowitz, Esq.
+
+Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A.
+
+18205 Biscayne Boulevard
+
+Suite 2218
+
+Miami, FL 33160
+
+305-931-2200
+
+Fax: 305-931-0877
+
+ssm@sexabuseattornev.com
+
+ahorowiteexabuseattorney,com
+
+Counsel for Plaintiffs
+
+In related Cases Nos. 08-80069, 08-80119,
+
+08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80993,
+
+08-80994
+
+Richard Horace Willits, Esq.
+
+Richard H. Willits, P.A.
+
+2290 10th Avenue North
+
+Suite 404
+
+Lake Worth, FL 33461
+
+561.582-7600
+
+Fax: 561-588-8819
+
+Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No.
+
+08-80811
+
+reelrhw@hotmail.com
+
+Jack Scarola, Esq.
+
+Jack P. M, Esq.
+
+Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
+
+2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
+
+West Palm Beach, FL 33409
+
+561-686-6300
+
+Fax: 561-383-9424
+
+jsx@searcvlaw.corn
+
+iph@searcvlaw.com
+
+Counsel for Plaintiff C.M.A.
+
+Bruce Reinhart, Esq.
+
+Bruce E. Reinhart, P.A.
+
+250 S. Australian Avenue
+
+Suite 1400
+
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+
+Esq.
+
+Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler
+
+401 East Las Olas Boulevard
+
+Suite 1650
+
+Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
+
+Phone: 954-522-3456
+
+Fax: 954-527-8663
+
+bedwards©rra-law.com
+
+Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No.
+
+08-80893
+
+Paul G. Cassell, Esq.
+
+Pro Hac Vice
+
+332 South 1400 E, Room 101
+
+Salt Lake City, UT 84112
+
+801-585-5202
+
+801-585-6833 Fax
+
+cassellp@law.utah.edu
+
+Co-counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe
+
+Isidro M. =, Esq.
+
+Law Firm, P.A.
+
+224 Datum Street, Suite 900
+
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+
+561-832-7732
+
+561-832-7137 F
+
+isidrogarcia©bellsouth.net
+
+Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No.
+
+08-80469
+
+Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq.
+
+Katherine W. Ezell, Esq.
+
+Podhurst Orseck, P.A.
+
+25 West Flagler Street, Suite 800
+
+Miami, FL 33130
+
+305 358-2800
+
+Fax: 305 358-2382
+
+thoftut@podhurst.com
+
+kezell@podhurst.com
+
+Counsel for Plaintiffs in Related Cases
+
+Nos. 09-80591 and 09-80656
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq.
+
+561-202-6360
+
+Fax: 561-828-0983
+
+ecf brucereinh rtl w.com
+
+Counsel for Defendant
+
+Theodore J. Leopold, Esq.
+
+Spencer T. Kuvin, Esq,
+
+Leopold, Kuvin, P.A.
+
+2925 PGA Blvd., Suite 200
+
+Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410
+
+561-684-6500
+
+Fax: 561-515-2610
+
+skuvin@lecooldkuvin.com
+
+Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No.
+
+08-08804
+
+Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
+
+250 Australian Avenue South
+
+Suite 1400
+
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012
+
+561-659-8300
+
+Fax: 561-835-8691
+
+jaciescP.bellsouth.net
+
+Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
+
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA-..
+
+JANE DOE NO. 2,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+v.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+Related Cases:
+
+08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80993, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80581, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092.
+
+# AFFIDAVIT OF IGOR ZINOVIEV
+
+STATE OF FLORIDA ) SS COUNTY OF PALM BEACH )
+
+BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, personally appeared Igor Zinoviev having personal knowledge and being duly sworn, deposes and says:
+
+- 1. My name is Igor Zinoview.
+- 2. I began working for Mr. Epstein in November of 2005.
+- 3. I did not know him until I began working for him.
+- 4. I have never discussed nor has he ever attempted to discuss with me any facts or information relating to any legal matters in which he is involved.
+  - 5. I work for Mr. Epstein as his driver, bodyguard and trainer.
+
+EXHIBIT A
+
+Page 2
+
+FURTHER THE AFFIANT SAYETH NAUGHT.
+
+![]()STATE OF FLORIDA  
+COUNTY OF PALM BEACH
+
+I hereby Certify that on this day, before me, an officer duly authorized to administer oaths and take acknowledgments, personally appeared Igor Zinoviev known to me to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing Affidavit, who acknowledged before me that he/she executed the same, that I relied upon the following form of identification of the above named person: Igor Zinoviev, and that an oath was/was not taken.
+
+WITNESS my hand and official seal in the County and State last aforesaid this day of Nov. 9, 2009.
+
+![](_page_6_Picture_18.jpeg)
+
+![]()IN THE COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO. 502008CA028051XXXXMB AB
+
+L.M.,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+v.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER TO PROHIBIT INAPPROPRIATE DEPOSITION QUESTIONS
+
+Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN ("Epstein"), pursuant to Rule 1.280(c), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, moves for a protective order to prohibit argumentative, harassing and inappropriate questions in depositions, and states:
+
+1. At numerous depositions, Plaintiffs counsel has repeatedly asked argumentative and harassing questions that are irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.
+
+2. In particular, Plaintiffs counsel has asked questions that improperly sought to illicit lay opinions from fact witnesses, asked questions regarding witnesses' feelings towards Mr. Epstein and their beliefs regarding media reports of this case, asked whether they would leave their children with Mr. Epstein and asked whether they would go back to work for Mr. Epstein assuming the media reports were accurate, among other things. These questions and the responses thereto will never be admissible. They are argumentative, irrelevant and seek speculative answers and inadmissible lay opinions.
+
+EXHIBIT 8
+
+Imo/ v. Epstein
+
+Case No. 502008CA028051XXXXMBAB
+
+Epsteln's Motion for Protective Order to Prohibit Inappropriate Deposition Questions
+
+Page 2 of 9
+
+3. For example, in the deposition of Larry Visoski, one of Mr. Epstein's pilots, Plaintiffs counsel asked the following questions seeking to obtain Mr. Visoski's beliefs and opinions on Plaintiffs allegations:
+
+> Q. All right. When you read in the newspapers the allegations that Mr. Epstein was involved with numerous underage girls for sexual reasons, were you surprised?
+
+A. I didn't believe it.
+
+Q. Do you believe it today?
+
+A. I don't believe it.
+
+Q. You don't believe that Jeffrey Epstein was involved with underage girls in a sexual way?
+
+MR. CRITTON: Form.
+
+THE WITNESS: You're asking for my opinion, and I don't think my opinion is relevant in that matter.
+
+BY MR.
+
+Q. I think it's relevant. Can you just tell me whether today you believe that Jeffrey Epstein has engaged in sex with underage girls?
+
+MR. CRITTON: Form; speculation, irrelevant, always.
+
+THE WITNESS: It's irrelevant.
+
+BY MR.
+
+Q. I need an answer.
+
+A. I don't believe he had sex with underage women.
+
+Q. Or engaged in any sexual acts with underage women?
+
+MR. CRITTON: Form.
+
+1,,M v. Epstein Case No. 502008CA028051XXXXMBAB Epstein's Motion for Protective Order to Prohibit Inappropriate Deposition Questions Page 3 of 9
+
+THE WITNESS: No.
+
+BY MR.
+
+Q. You think that this is just a story that a bunch of underage women have made up?
+
+A. Speculation.
+
+• \* \* \*
+
+Q. Then we'll handle the question this way: If you were to believe based on information and evidence that Mr. Epstein engaged in sex or some form of sex acts with people of the age range of 12, 13, 14, 15 years old, would you continue your employment with Mr. Epstein?
+
+MR. CRITTON: Form; speculation.
+
+THE WITNESS: I would certainly be speculating and I have to discuss it with my wife long and hard. I don't think I could give you a correct and honest answer at this time.
+
+See Excerpts of Deposition of Larry Visokski at 66-67; 181-82 (attached as composite Exhibit A). Other examples of similar improper questions are included in Exhibit A.
+
+4. Not only do these questions seek improper lay opinions, Plaintiffs counsel asked Mr. Visoski his belief as to the truth of hearsay newspaper articles. The foregoing questions are obviously irrelevant, argumentative and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.
+
+5. Moreover, whether Mr. Visoski would continue working for Mr. Epstein if Plaintiff's allegations are true has absolutely no relevance to any claim or defense in this case. The questions are simply improper and meant to harass and embarrass the IN v. Epstein Case No. 50200BCA028051XXXXMBAB Epstein's Motion for Protective Order to Prohibit Inappropriate Deposition Questions Page 4 of 9
+
+witness.
+
+6. Mr. Visoski was questioned for over four hours and much of the time was wasted on irrelevant and harassing questions.
+
+7. Plaintiffs counsel asked similar questions at the deposition of Larry Eugene ME, another one of Mr. Epstein's pilots:
+
+> Q. Certainly you've read certain newspaper articles about the allegations, police reports, otherwise, the allegations that occurred or have been alleged to have occurred at his Palm Beach mansion, correct?
+
+A. Uh-huh.
+
+Q. Correct?
+
+A. Correct.
+
+Q. Given the nature of those allegations, would you leave your daughter of 17, 16, 15 years old with Mr. Epstein alone?
+
+MR. PIKE: Form. Move to strike.
+
+A. Yes.
+
+• \* • •
+
+Q. And despite pleading guilty to procuring underage girls for the purposes of sex, you still feel comfortable leaving <sup>a</sup> 13, 14, 15-year-old girl around him?
+
+MR. PIKE: Form. Move to strike.
+
+A. Yes. I mean, with my daughter, yes. I don't know how he behaves around anybody else. I just know that the respect that he showed me, I feel safe with my daughter.
+
+Q. And have you read in detail the reports as to what happened at his house with the girls?
+
+ue v. Epstein
+
+Case No. 502008CA028051XWMBAB
+
+Epstein's Motion for Protective Order to Prohibit Inappropriate Deposition Questions
+
+Page 5 of 9
+
+A. Only —
+
+MR. PIKE: Form.
+
+A. — what's been in the newspapers and published.
+
+Q. If you read and hear testimony given - well, I can tell you now - testimony has been given in this case that what happens is: A 13 or 14 year old is led upstairs by herself, told to get naked, he lays down on his back, there is a brief massage before he turns over, exposes himself erect, masturbates while he tells this 13 or 14 year old to pinch his nipples as hard as she can while he inserts his fingers into their vagina and ejaculates all over them before saying, "Take your money and leave."
+
+MR. PIKE: Form. Move to strike.
+
+BY MR.
+
+Q. Okay? Then, "You can continue to come back for \$200 every time or every girl you bring me within your age group and I get to do this again, I pay you \$200 per person." If that is the testimony --
+
+MR. PIKE: Form.
+
+Q. — that what happens behind closed doors with him, do you still feel comfortable leaving a13 or 14 year old in <sup>a</sup> room with Jeffrey Epstein?
+
+MR. PIKE: Form.
+
+A. If that, in fact, is what actually happened, no.
+
+Q. [Would you] go back - considering what you've read and what you may or may not believe - would you go back to working for Jeffrey Epstein?
+
+MR. PIKE: Form.
+
+A. I can't say. I still work for him on a maintenance - to
+
+La v. Epstein
+
+Case No. 502008CA028051XXXXMBAB
+
+Epstein's Motion for Protective Order to Prohibit Inappropriate Deposition Questions
+
+Page 6 of 9
+
+maintain the airplanes and stuff like that, so.
+
+See Excerpts of Deposition of Larry Eugene at 135-36; 175-76; <sup>184</sup> (attached as composite Exhibit B).
+
+8. Again, whether Mr. would work for Mr. Epstein "considering what [he has] read and what [he] may or may not believe" (i.e. considering hearsay media accounts and inadmissible lay opinion) has no bearing on the instant case.
+
+9. In addition, questions regarding whether Mr. would leave his children alone with Mr. Epstein could have only been meant to harass and embarrass Mr. NM Nevertheless, Mr. testified that he would leave his children with Mr. Epstein. As Plaintiffs counsel was obviously not happy with the answer to this question, he proceeded to press Mr. with inflammatory statements until he got the answer he wanted.
+
+10. Plaintiff's counsel has also asked the same improper line of questions in other witnesses' depositions.
+
+11. The above-cited questions exceed the bounds of permissible discovery; they have absolutely no relevance to this case. Accordingly, the Court should enter <sup>a</sup> protective order prohibiting such questions and should sanction Plaintiff's counsel if such inappropriate questions are asked at future depositions.
+
+12. Regarding the scope of discovery, Judge Linnea noted in her October 28, 2009 Omnibus Order,' "[w]hile the scope of discovery is broad, it is not
+
+<sup>1</sup> The Omnibus Order (DE #377) was entered in the federal companion case Jane Doe No. 2 v, Epstein Case No. 08-CIV-80119 MARRia In the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida.
+
+LM v. Epstein Case No. 502008CAD28051X=MBAB Epstein's Motion for Protective Order to Prohibit inappropriate Deposition Questions Page 7 of 9
+
+without limits. Washington v. a& Williamson Tobacco <sup>959</sup>F.2d 1566, 1570 (11th Cir. 1992). ... Courts have long held that '[w]hile the standard of relevancy [in discovery] is a liberal one, it is not so liberal as to allow a party to roam in the shadow zones of relevancy and to explore matter (sic) which does not presently appear germane on the theory that it might conceivably become so.' Food Lion. Inc. V. United Food & Commercial Workers Intern. Union, <sup>103</sup>F.3d 1007, 1012-13 (C.A. D.C. 1997) (string cite omitted)." See also Capco Properties, LLC v. Monterry Gardens of Pinecrest Condo. <sup>982</sup>So. 2d 1211, (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) (holding that discovery in civil cases must be relevant to the subject matter of the case and must be admissible or reasonably calculated to lead to admissible evidence) Morton Plant Hospital Ass'n, Inc. v. Shahbas, <sup>960</sup>So. 2d 820, 824 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) (holding that "discovery should be denied when it has been established that the information requested is neither relevant to any pending claim or defense nor will it lead to the discovery of admissible evidence," citing Tanchel v. Shoemaker, <sup>928</sup>So. 2d 440, 442 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)).
+
+13. As illustrated above, the questions are simply not germane to any pending claim or defense nor will they lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Whether Mr. Visoski believes or disbelieves the media accounts of this case, or whether Mr. would leave his children with Mr. Epstein is not relevant and cannot conceivably lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.
+
+14. The Court should curtail these inappropriate lines of questions and enter <sup>a</sup> protective order prohibiting them.
+
+15. Rule 1.280(c), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, provides the Court with
+
+LM v. Epstein
+
+Case No. 5020D8CA028051XX)0MBAB
+
+Epsteln's Motion for Protective Order to Prohibit Inappropriate Deposition Questions
+
+Page 8 of 9
+
+the power to "make any order to protect a party or person from annoyance, embarrassment, oppression or undue burden or expense that justice requires including ... (4) that certain matter not be inquired into, or that the scope of the discovery be limited to certain matters."
+
+16. Accordingly, Epstein requests the Court enter a protective order prohibiting Plaintiffs counsel from asking witnesses' questions regarding opinions and beliefs regarding media articles and the allegations in this case and whether they would leave their children with Epstein or questions of a similar nature, and limiting the scope to the witnesses personal knowledge regarding matters relevant to the claims and defenses in this case. See Shahbas, 960 So. 2d at 824.
+
+WHEREFORE, Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, respectfully requests the Court enter a protective order prohibiting Plaintiffs counsel from asking witnesses' questions regarding opinions and beliefs regarding media articles and the allegations in this case and whether they would leave their children with Epstein or questions of a similar nature, and limiting the scope to the witnesses personal knowledge regarding matters relevant to the claims and defenses in this case and grant any additional relief the Court deems just and proper.
+
+#### Certificate of Service
+
+<sup>I</sup>HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was sent by fax and U.S. Mail to the following addressees on this 3rd day of November, 2009:
+
+Brad Esq. Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler 401 East Las Olas Boulevard Suite 1650
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400
+
+UN V. Epstein
+
+Case No. 5O2008CA02805DOOOMBAB
+
+Epstein's Motion for Protective Order to Prohibit Inappropriate Deposition Questions
+
+Page 9 of 9
+
+Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
+
+954-522-3456 Phone
+
+954-527-8663 Fax
+
+Counsel for Plaintiff
+
+Jay Howell, Esq.
+
+Jay Howell & Associates, P.A.
+
+644 Cesery Boulevard
+
+Suite 250
+
+Jacksonville, FL 32211
+
+904-680-1234 Phone
+
+904-680-1238 Fax
+
+Co-counsel for Plaintiff
+
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012
+
+Fax: 561-835-8691
+
+Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
+
+BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN, LLP
+
+303 Banyan Blvd., Suite 400
+
+West Palm Be , FL 33401
+
+(561) 842-
+
+(561) 84
+
+By:
+
+Critton, Jr.
+
+F orida Bar #224162
+
+Michael J. Pike
+
+Florida Bar #617296
+
+(Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein)
+
+Larry Visoski
+
+October 15, 2009
+
+| <p>IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT<br/>         IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA<br/>         CASE NO. 502008CA028051XXXXMB AD</p> <p>L.M.,</p> <p>-vs-</p> <p>JEFFREY EPSTEIN,</p> <p>Defendant.</p> <hr/> <p>DEPOSITION OF LARRY VISOSKI</p> <p>Thursday, October 15, 2009<br/>         10:18 - 3:37 p.m.</p> <p>515 N. Flagler Drive<br/>         Suite #200<br/>         West Palm Beach, Florida 33401</p> <p>Reported By:<br/>         Wendy Beath, [REDACTED], RPR, CRR, FPR<br/>         Notary Public, State of Florida<br/>         Esquire Deposition Services<br/>         West Palm Beach Office Job #127542</p>                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       | <p>3</p> <p>1 ---</p> <p>2 INDEX</p> <p>3 ---</p> <p>4</p> <p>5 WITNESS: DIRECT CROSS REDIRECT RECROSS</p> <p>6 LARRY VISOSKI</p> <p>7</p> <p>8 BY MR. [REDACTED] 6</p> <p>9 BY MR. [REDACTED] 214</p> <p>10 BY MR. [REDACTED] 220</p> <p>11 BY MR. CRITTON: 221</p> <p>12 ---</p> <p>13 EXHIBITS</p> <p>14 ---</p> <p>15</p> <p>16 NUMBER DESCRIPTION PAGE</p> <p>17 PLAINTIFF'S EX. 1 FLIGHT LOG BOOK<br/>         (MARKED IN PREVIOUS DEPO)</p> <p>18</p> <p>19 PLAINTIFF'S EX. 2 MESSAGE PAD 119</p> <p>20 PLAINTIFF'S EX. 3 MESSAGE PAD 119</p> <p>21 PLAINTIFF'S EX. 4 COMPLAINT 139</p> <p>22 PLAINTIFF'S EX. 5 INMATE VISITOR LOG 161</p> <p>23</p> <p>24</p> <p>25</p>                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
+|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| <p>2</p> <p>1 APPEARANCES:</p> <p>2 On behalf of the Plaintiff:</p> <p>3 [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED] ESQUIRE</p> <p>4 ROTHSTEIN, ROSENFELDT, ADLER</p> <p>5 401 East Las Olas Boulevard</p> <p>6 Suite 1650</p> <p>7 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33364</p> <p>8</p> <p>9 On behalf of the Defendant:</p> <p>10 ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQUIRE</p> <p>11 BURMAN, CRITTON &amp; LUTTIER</p> <p>12 303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400</p> <p>13 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401</p> <p>14</p> <p>15 On behalf of the Witness:</p> <p>16 BRUCE REINHART, ESQUIRE</p> <p>17 250 South Australian Avenue</p> <p>18 Suite 1400</p> <p>19 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401</p> <p>20</p> <p>21 ALSO PRESENT:</p> <p>22 CARA L. [REDACTED] ESQUIRE</p> <p>23 1220 N.W. 157th Avenue</p> <p>24 Pembroke Pines, Florida 33028</p> <p>25 ADAM D. HOROWITZ, ESQUIRE</p> <p>26 MERMELSTEIN &amp; HOROWITZ, P.A.</p> <p>27 18205 Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 2218</p> <p>28 Miami, Florida 33160</p> <p>29 RICHARD H. WILLITS, ESQUIRE (VIA TELEPHONE)</p> <p>30 RICHARD H. WILLITS, P.A.</p> <p>31 2290 10th Avenue North, Suite 404</p> <p>32 Lake Worth, Florida 33461</p> <p>33</p> <p>34</p> <p>35</p> | <p>4</p> <p>1 PROCEEDINGS</p> <p>2 ---</p> <p>3 Deposition taken before Wendy Beath [REDACTED]</p> <p>4 Certified Realline Reporter and Notary Public in and for</p> <p>5 the State of Florida at Large, in the above cause.</p> <p>6 ---</p> <p>7 MR. [REDACTED]: We're going to put something on</p> <p>8 the record about -- well, we'll do it this way --</p> <p>9 MR. REINHART: Do it at the end, after we get</p> <p>10 him -- whatever you want. It's your show.</p> <p>11 MR. [REDACTED]: Okay. There were -- I don't</p> <p>12 even think Mr. Willits is aware of this. There was</p> <p>13 a subpoena duces tecum for this witness, as well as</p> <p>14 the previous witness, which was another pilot, Dave</p> <p>15 Rogers, and that duces tecum was to bring the</p> <p>16 flight logs related from 1998 through 2005. What</p> <p>17 was produced at the previous deposition were flight</p> <p>18 logs from 2002 through 2005, and now Mr. Reinhart</p> <p>19 has agreed to produce the remainder of the flight</p> <p>20 logs requested, those going from 1998 through 2002.</p> <p>21 MR. REINHART: Correct. They're pilot logs,</p> <p>22 not flight logs. There are other records we</p> <p>23 indicated are corporate records, and with those you</p> <p>24 have to deal with Mr. Critton.</p> <p>25 MR. CRITTON: However, with the proviso, too,</p> |
+
+![](_page_16_Picture_10.jpeg)
+
+67
+
+women?
+
+MR. CRITTON: Form.
+
+THE WITNESS: No.
+
+BY MRIMINI:
+
+O. You think that this Is Just a story that a 6 bunch of underage women have made up?
+
+7 A. Speculation.
+
+MR. CRITTON: Objection. Now its
+
+9 argumentative. Who gives a dam what he thinks one :0 way or another? f he has personal knowledge —
+
+l1 MR : You're objecting to the form?
+
+;2 MR. CRITTON: Its argumentative.
+
+13 MRIIIM: You're objecting to the form?
+
+lla MR. CRITTON: Yes.
+
+X15 Min: Okay.
+
+.16 BY MR
+
+17 O. Is that something that you believe that a
+
+18 bunch of women — some of which know each other, some 19'. don't some of which have been on the airplane and some
+
+20 which haven't — made this up, that Jeffrey Epstein
+
+21 engaged in some sexual conduct with them?
+
+22 MR. CRITTON: Form.
+
+23 THE WITNESS: What I believe doesn't matter In
+
+24 Ws case, does it?
+
+25
+
+1 2 3 4 Q. All right. When you read in the newspapers the allegations that Mr. Epstein was involved with numerous underage girls for sexual reasons, were you surprised?
+
+S A. I didn't believe it.
+
+6 Q. Do you believe it today?
+
+8 O. You don't believe that Jeffrey Epstein was involved with underage girls in a sexual way?
+
+10 MR. CRITTON: Form.
+
+11 12 13 THE WITNESS: You're asking for my opinion, and I don't think my opinion is relevant In that matter.
+
+19 BY MR.
+
+15 16 Q. I think It's relevant Can you just tell me whether today you believe that Jeffrey Epstein has
+
+17 engaged in sex with underage girls? MR. CRITTON: Form; speculation, Irrelevant,
+
+18
+
+19 20 always. THE WITNESS: It's Irrelevant.
+
+21 BY MR.
+
+22 Q. I need an answer.
+
+23 A. I don't believe he had sex with underage
+
+24
+
+25 0. Or engaged in any sexual acts with underage
+
+66
+
+A. I don't believe it
+
+68
+
+BY
+
+2 Q. I need an answer. Do you believe It? Do you 3 believe these girls made this up?
+
+4 MR. CRITTON: Form.
+
+5 MR. REINHART: I'm going to instruct him not 6 to answer. Move on.
+
+7 MR.-: Is there a privilege that we're 8 asserting?
+
+9 MR. REINHART: No, It's irrelevant. It's 10 harassment and not likely to lead to discoverable 11 evidence.
+
+12 I'm going to-put on the record 13 right now that it is — we we allowed discovery
+
+14 into a RICO count. We are also allowed discovery
+
+15 Into the intent of Mr. Epstein In developing a 16 criminal enterprise designed to sexually exploit
+
+17 and sexually abuse underage girls. We beHave that 18 In doing so, he associated Intentionally with
+
+19 people of similar beliefs that sex with underage 20 girls is okay, and that there have been many
+
+21 discussions with this witness, as well as many 22 other witnesses with -- to Insure his protection
+
+23 from law enforcement that they not answer these 24 specific questions. And thus, the opinions and
+
+25 beliefs of all of these witnesses that we are
+
+alleging associated with this criminal enterprise are certainly reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. And If you're still Instructing the witness, based on that proffer, not to answer any of these questions, tin going to continue to ask the questions and you can instruct him not to answer and we can go to the B Court MR. REINHART: My response is to his opinion whether people making allegations in this case are colluding or making up <sup>a</sup>story is irrelevant to what you Just said. So I am going to instruct him not to answer any question that goes to his opinion of someone else's motivation or the truth of facts to which he has no knowledge. So yes, I'm instructing him not to answer, MR. GRITTON: Let me add in my part, Is that I think — you're certainly not only capable to ask questions with regard to what his persona<sup>l</sup> knowledge is, and If he knows something or he has reasonable basis for it; certainly you are entitled to that information. I think yotNe asked those questions and he's given you straightforward answers as to what he knew or what he didn't know under those circumstances. And as to what his
+
+ a A. It's an °Onion. and I believe that he has not. Q. Okay. Isn't It true that at some point in time you learned that Jeffrey Epstein has — strike that. MR. CRITTON: When you ultimately get to <sup>a</sup> good place to break, will you let us know? MR. : Let's break now. (A break was had at 11:28 a.m.) BY MR. =II O. MI right. Eighteen years of being a pilot for Jeffrey Epstein and In terms of being able to name somebody that you would say you've observed with Jeffrey Epstein and v•otid classify that person as Jeffrey Epstein's friend, can you name anybody? A. Nadia, Sarah; Just people that we see routinely on the airplane. Q. Mists people you see routinely In the last five to ten years, rigor? A Yes. Q. Prior to that time, anybody that youVe noticed as Jeffrey Epstein's friend may be Ghislaine Maxwell? A Mat One frame? Q. Is that a person that at some point In time
+
+thoughts are on something which he has no factual basis or even en assumption to know one way or another is Irrelevant. That's ultimately for <sup>a</sup> fact-finder In this case. While it's interesting, it's argumentative and I don't think he's — I mean, do it on <sup>a</sup> question-by-question basis. If he has knowledge, that's great, but to argue your case with this witness or any other witness doesn't serve <sup>a</sup> purpose and I think Is, you know — I think it's not a good use of our time, I'll put it that way. But you know, you can go ahead and ask. MR. I can ask the question and if the witness is being instructed not to answer, we'll let a Judge decide whether he needs to answer the question and whether its discoverable or not. MR. REINHART: Absolutely. Make your record. BY MR. Q. Do you have any reason to believe that Jeffrey Epstein engaged In sexual activity with underage women? A. I have no reason to believe. Q. Okay. So es you sit here today, based on your 18 years of knowledge, experience and observation of Jeffrey Epstein. is a your beief that he has not had sex or engaged in sexual activity WM underage women?
+
+you wotid classify as Jeffrey Epstein's Mend? A. I %%arid classify il. I don/ know if its true. O. But Mars only because they were on the airplane together? A. Yes. O. Do you know what Jeffrey Epstein does for <sup>a</sup> <sup>B</sup>Wing In yots 18 years of observing and talking wth Jeffrey Epstein? A. No. O. No idea? A. No. Q. Ever asked him? A. No, actually. Q. Ever been curious? A, Sure. O. Everdone anything to satisfy that curiosity? A. If you mean Google it, not really, actually. I mean, I really have not. Q. Okay. So in 18 years of travelng and being the plot and driving — and taking this person. Jeffrey Epstein, from one property In New York to New Mexico and Florida and around the world, you have no Idea what he does in terms of how he makes money? A. No, sin
+
+156
+
+2 .3
+
+MR. GRIMM: Form. <sup>5</sup>THE WITNESS: No.
+
+6 BY MR. Q. If you had been aware that Mt. Epstein was and by this — this Is more in the form of <sup>a</sup> hypothetical, and that I'm not going.to suggest to you It's a fact that he was. But If you had been aware that every single day Jeffrey Epstein's goal was to locate underage girls (or the purposes of sex, and either have sex with them on the airplane or at some other designation that you were destination that you were traveling him to, would you have continued to pilot those planes?
+
+AT MR. CRITTON: Form. 1e THE WITNESS: You said It was hypothetical? 19 BY MR. 20Q. Right, it is a hypothetical, 21A. Why would I want to answer that? Because 22you're being hypothetical. <sup>I</sup>moan, It would obviously ;3 be wrong. la Q. Sure. Well, a hypothetical question is <sup>a</sup> IS legal question that I'm allowed to ask.
+
+A. Okay. Q. And rm Just asking you II you did have knovAedge that Jeffrey Epstein was having sex with little gkls either on the plane or at a place that you were taking him to or from on <sup>a</sup>daily basks, that's what he did, would you have continued to be his SW MR. CRITTON: Lel me object Oblect to the form. 118 argumentative. It has no more value than assuming he was chopping up bodies or anybo4 was chopping up bodies In the plane you're llytig. What difference does It make? Form, MR. Ma Wnat difference does It make in a case about him having sex with little gins? rrn not going to argue with you about it. You've staled your objection. MR. CRITTON: Exactly. It's an argurnentelNe 3.7 question. is MR. Mt 90109109(9999499 you about it. MR. CRITTON: You're arguing with him about now. MR. NO, I'M inking him the hypothetical. sr PAR..= Q. Can you answer that? Would you have continuer
+
+to be a pilot for somebody who's traveling to and from destinations with the goal of having sex with underage girls? MR. CRITTON: Form. THE WITNESS: It could be any person. It doesn't have to be Jeffrey Epstein, then, right? BY MR-: Q. True. ' A. No, I wouldn't pilot an airplane If there was wrongdoing going on. Q. That you knew about? A. That I knew you about, sure. Q. Me reading this complaint to you, Is tNs the first time you've heard these allegations — A Yea. Q. — against Mr. Epstein? A. Yes.
+
+,
+
+which he pled guilty le — MR. CRITTON: Form. MR. FtEINHART: Can we — for purposes of your <sup>o</sup>hypothetical, what facts do you want him to assume are true? You said the facts to which he pled guilty, but the witness already said he doesn't know what he pled guilty to. He knows the charge he doesn't know the facts. BY MR. Q. SoacitatIon of prostitution of a mince, somebody under the age of 18. MR. That's the charge, right, solicitation of prostitution of a minor? MR. CRITTON: No. I think you've got it wrong. Ill object to the form. MR. Okay. BY MR. Q, Then wel handle the question tNs way: If you were to believe based on information and evidence that Mr. Epstein engaged in sex or some form of sex act with people of the age range of 12, 13, 14,15 years ofd, would you continua your employment with . W. Epstein? MR. CRITTON: Form; speculabon. THE WITNESS: I would certainly be speculating
+
+182'
+
+and I have to discuss it with my wife long and • hard. I don't think I could give you a correct and honest answer at this time. BY MR. O. O ay. n the negations that have been made in this case, Is lids something that you have discussed with anyone other than your attorney? A. No, not really. Only from the fact that theyre allegations and there's stil a lot more work, I'm sure, to be discovered. MR. CRITTON: Let me put on there, for the - If this deposition li not typed — and cure request 8 — I'd like at least this portion where Mr. last question back about five pages Worth. SO Just if you could mark it from this page back about five pages. II nobody requests the deposition, rd just like those five pages. MR. I'm going to request the deposition, so... MR. CRITTON: Okay. We'll mark !Ills then, so you could tell me where It. Is, approximately. BY MR. Q. Is I ere a son why you have not discussed with Jeffrey Epstein the allegations that have been m•
+
+Larry Eugene [REDACTED] - Volume I
+
+October 6, 2009
+
+| <p>1</p> <p>IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN<br/>                     AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA</p> <p>VOLUME I Pages 1 to 200</p> <p>L.M.,</p> <p>Plaintiff,</p> <p>vn.</p> <p>JEFFREY EPSTEIN,</p> <p>Defendant.</p> <p>X</p> <p>DEPOSITION OF<br/>                     LARRY EUGENE [REDACTED]<br/>                     TAKEN ON BEHALF OF THE PLAINTIFF<br/>                     October 6, 2009<br/>                     10:55 a.m. - 2:20 p.m.<br/>                     515 N. Flagler Drive<br/>                     West Palm Beach, FL 33401-4321</p> <p>Jennifer Dilerenzo, court reporter</p>                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             | <p>3</p> <p>APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL<br/>                     1 On behalf of the Defendant:<br/>                     2 ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER &amp; WEISS<br/>                     3 BY: JACK ALAN GOLDBERGER, ESQ.,<br/>                     4 250 Australian Avenue<br/>                     Suite 1400<br/>                     5 West Palm Beach, FL 33401<br/>                     561-659-8300<br/>                     jgoldberger@agwpa.com<br/>                     6<br/>                     7 On behalf of the Defendant by telephone:<br/>                     8 BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER &amp; COLEMAN<br/>                     9 BY: MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ.,<br/>                     515 N. Flagler Drive<br/>                     10 Suite 400<br/>                     West Palm Beach, FL 33401<br/>                     561-842-2820<br/>                     mpike@bclclaw.com<br/>                     11<br/>                     12 On behalf of the witness:<br/>                     13<br/>                     14 LAW OFFICE OF BRUCE E. REINHART<br/>                     15 BY: BRUCE E. REINHART, ESQ.,<br/>                     One Clearlake Center<br/>                     16 250 S. Australian Avenue<br/>                     Suite 1400<br/>                     West Palm Beach, FL 33401<br/>                     561-202-6360<br/>                     BReinhart@BruceREinhartLaw.com<br/>                     18<br/>                     19<br/>                     20<br/>                     21<br/>                     22<br/>                     23<br/>                     24<br/>                     25</p> |
+|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| <p>2</p> <p>1 APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL<br/>                     2 On behalf of the Plaintiff L.M.:<br/>                     3 ROTHSTEIN, ROSENEEL DT &amp; ADLER<br/>                     4 BY: [REDACTED] J. [REDACTED], ESQ.<br/>                     5 and MICHAEL WHEELER, ESQ.,<br/>                     601 East Las Olas Boulevard<br/>                     Suite 1850<br/>                     Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394<br/>                     654-522-3458<br/>                     bedwards@rra-law.com<br/>                     mmhester@rra-law.com<br/>                     9 On behalf of Plaintiff's Jane Doe 2 through 8:<br/>                     10 MERMELSTEIN &amp; HOROWITZ, P.A.<br/>                     BY: JESSICA D. ARBOUR, ATTORNEY-AT-LAW,<br/>                     18205 Biscayne Boulevard<br/>                     11 Suite 2218<br/>                     Miami, FL 33160<br/>                     305-931-2200<br/>                     jarbour@sexabusealtorney.com<br/>                     12<br/>                     13 On behalf of Plaintiff's Jane Doe 101 and 102 by<br/>                     telephone:<br/>                     14<br/>                     15 PODHURST ORSECK, P.A.<br/>                     BY: KATHERINE W. EZELL, ATTORNEY-AT-LAW,<br/>                     25 W. Flagler Street<br/>                     Miami, FL 33130<br/>                     305-355-2800<br/>                     kezell@podhurst.com<br/>                     16<br/>                     17 On behalf of the Plaintiff C.M.A. by telephone:<br/>                     18<br/>                     19 LAW OFFICE OF RICHARD WILLITS, P.A.<br/>                     BY: RICHARD WILLITS, ESQ.,<br/>                     2200 10th Avenue N.<br/>                     Suite 404<br/>                     Lake Worth, FL 33401<br/>                     661-582-7600<br/>                     linyurwillis@aol.com<br/>                     20<br/>                     21 Plaintiff's Composite 1 was attached to the<br/>                     22 original transcript and copies of the transcript.<br/>                     23<br/>                     24<br/>                     25</p> | <p>4</p> <p>INDEX OF EXAMINATION</p> <p>WITNESS:<br/>                     LARRY EUGENE [REDACTED] Page<br/>                     DIRECT EXAMINATION<br/>                     By Mr. [REDACTED] #5<br/>                     7<br/>                     CROSS-EXAMINATION<br/>                     By Ms. Ezell #190<br/>                     9 CROSS-EXAMINATION #195<br/>                     By Mr. Willits #195<br/>                     10<br/>                     CROSS-EXAMINATION<br/>                     By Mr. Pike #196<br/>                     12 FURTHER REDIRECT EXAMINATION<br/>                     By Mr. [REDACTED] #199<br/>                     13<br/>                     14<br/>                     15<br/>                     16<br/>                     17<br/>                     Plaintiff's Description Page<br/>                     18 Exhibit 1 Twenty-four pages of "JEGE, Inc.,<br/>                     Passenger Manifest." #138<br/>                     19<br/>                     20<br/>                     21<br/>                     22<br/>                     23<br/>                     24<br/>                     25 (Plaintiff's Composite 1 was attached to the<br/>                     original transcript and copies of the transcript.)</p>                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
+
+![](_page_22_Picture_4.jpeg)
+
+135
+
+- A. I have no idea. I dont know. 2 O. When you say the was Just 3 ccnin In the icture tahat's your understanding as to 4 Is relative to Mr. Epstein? 5 A I don't know. I don't understand. I 6 don't know. I didn't know If maybe she was like an exchange — Jeffrey alloys aPPearedlo be very Involved in education and philanthropy. I richt 9 know If she was an exchange-type student or something 10 or Mat. I don't know. 11 O. When you say he appeared to be Involved in," 12 what do you mean? 13 A. Educational things, foundations, science 1.4 foundations, and things. 15 O. Speaking of - the Florida Science Foundation 16 Is a place More, when he weer on work release, he spent a 17 lot of lime there, you're aware of that? is A. That's whet Na heard, yeah. 19'. O. what does ihat place do? 20 A I have no idea. 21 O. Does it do anything? 22 A I dont know. I don't know anything about 23 It. 24 O. Certainly you've read certain newspaper 25 artioles about the allegations. pace reports,
+
+136
+
+- 1 otherwise, the agegations that occurred or have been 2 alleged to have occurred at his Palm Beach mansion, 3 correct? 4 A. Uh-huh. 5 Cr. Coned? 6 A. Correct. 7 0. Given the nature of those allegations, would B you leave your daughter of 17, 15, 15 years old with Mt. 9 Epstein alone? .10 MR. PIKE: Form. Move to strike. 11 A Yes. 12 O. You would? 13 A. (Winne nods head.) 14 O. And why? 1s A. Because I don't fear that he would try 16 anything wish my daughter. He showed — When I 17 worked for him he showed me respect. He never — I
+- 18 never He never showed me disrespect. He would ask 19 how the family is. I mean, not on a personal level, 20 but an employerfemployee. 21 O. Right. Okay. 22 A. He never showed me any reason not to trust 23 him. 24 O. But you're not a 13-year old girl, so. 25 A No, but, like I say, he never showed me
+
+I . Q. And despite pleading guilty to procuring underage girls for the purposes of sex, you still feel comfortable leaving a 13, 14,15-year-old girl around him?
+
+MR. PIKE: Form. Move to slrbe.
+
+A. Yes. I mean, with my daughter. yes. I don't know how he behaves around anybody else. <sup>I</sup> just know that the respect that he showed ma, I feel safe with my daughter.
+
+0. And have you reed In detail the reports as to what happened at hie house with the gals?
+
+A. Only -
+
+MR. PIKE: Form.
+
+A. — what's been in the newspapers and published.
+
+Q. If you read and hear testimony given - well, can tell you now -testimony has been given In this case lb. that what happens Is: A 13 or 14 year old Is led
+
+upstairs by herself, told to get naked, he lays down on his back, there is a brief massage before he turns over, exposes himself erect, masturbates while he tells this <sup>13</sup> or 14 year oW to pinch his nipples as hard as she can while he Inserts his fingers into their vagina and ejaculates ail over them before saying, "Take your money and leave."
+
+MR. PIKE: Form. Move to strike. BY PAR.Illa:
+
+Q. Okay? Then, "You can continue to conic back for \$200 every time or every girl you bring me within your age group and I gel to do this again, I pay you \$200 per person.' If that is the testimony —
+
+MR. PIKE: Form.
+
+Q. — that what happens behind closed doors with him, do you still feel comforlabie leaving a13 or <sup>14</sup> year old In a room with Jeffrey Epstein?
+
+MR, PIKE: Form.
+
+A. If that, in fact, Is what actually happened, no.
+
+184
+
+1 you witnessed Jeffrey Epstein committing? 2 A No. 3 Q. Would you — 4 A. No. 5 0. - go back - considering what you've read and 6 what you may or may not believe- would you go back to 7 working for Jeffrey Epstein? MR. PIKE: Form. 9 A. I can't say. I still work for him on a 10 maintenance -to maintain the airplanes and stuff 11 like (hal. so. 12 Q. You're on his payroll? 13 A. Salaried, yes. 0. Do you know who else Is on his payroll? 15 A. Well, Dave and Larry. 16 Q. Certainty. If I want to know more about his 17 private life - do you know who's at his house? 18 A. No. 19 0. Do you know who his housekeeper Is? 20 A No. 21 0. Do you know who his archaecl is? 22 A. No, no. 23 0. Does Larry visit him at his house? 24 A. I would assume so. 25 Q. Why do you say you would assume so? •Thal
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740188/EFTA02740188.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740188/EFTA02740188.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..266d4f35f6efdd47ba794de4ba7760138c9ba556
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740188/EFTA02740188.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,1160 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740188.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 26,
+  "chars": 54989,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 35.93,
+  "image_assets": [
+    "_page_6_Picture_18.jpeg",
+    "_page_16_Picture_10.jpeg",
+    "_page_22_Picture_4.jpeg"
+  ],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            196.95000000000002,
+            93.15
+          ],
+          [
+            396.1564025878906,
+            93.15
+          ],
+          [
+            396.1564025878906,
+            120.228515625
+          ],
+          [
+            196.95000000000002,
+            120.228515625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "THIRD PARTY WITNESS, IGOR ZINOVIEW'S, \nMOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND \nINCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            172.10399999999998,
+            352.35
+          ],
+          [
+            422.93267822265625,
+            352.35
+          ],
+          [
+            422.93267822265625,
+            392.8485412597656
+          ],
+          [
+            172.10399999999998,
+            392.8485412597656
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Rule 7.1 Certification",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            240.597,
+            323.19
+          ],
+          [
+            349.61285400390625,
+            323.19
+          ],
+          [
+            349.61285400390625,
+            338.4785461425781
+          ],
+          [
+            240.597,
+            338.4785461425781
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Certificate of Service",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            241.80300000000003,
+            440.6400000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            348.9690856933594,
+            440.6400000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            348.9690856933594,
+            455.4785461425781
+          ],
+          [
+            241.80300000000003,
+            455.4785461425781
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Certificate of Service",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            243.61200000000002,
+            93.15
+          ],
+          [
+            348.93206787109375,
+            93.15
+          ],
+          [
+            348.93206787109375,
+            107.478515625
+          ],
+          [
+            243.61200000000002,
+            107.478515625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            199.59300000000002,
+            92.34
+          ],
+          [
+            399.9547119140625,
+            92.34
+          ],
+          [
+            399.9547119140625,
+            120.968505859375
+          ],
+          [
+            199.59300000000002,
+            120.968505859375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "AFFIDAVIT OF IGOR ZINOVIEV",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            209.84399999999997,
+            366.12
+          ],
+          [
+            389.1354064941406,
+            366.12
+          ],
+          [
+            389.1354064941406,
+            381.5985412597656
+          ],
+          [
+            209.84399999999997,
+            381.5985412597656
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER TO \nPROHIBIT INAPPROPRIATE DEPOSITION QUESTIONS",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            149.544,
+            288.35999999999996
+          ],
+          [
+            448.029,
+            288.35999999999996
+          ],
+          [
+            448.029,
+            315.9
+          ],
+          [
+            149.544,
+            315.9
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Certificate of Service",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 14,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            244.21500000000003,
+            585.6299999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            363.1531677246094,
+            585.6299999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            363.1531677246094,
+            598.59
+          ],
+          [
+            244.21500000000003,
+            598.59
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            11
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            55
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            65
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            33
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            172
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            85
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            80
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            47
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            24
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            22
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            52
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            11
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            15
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "Picture",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            230
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            29
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            241
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            31
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            21
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 9,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            294
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            32
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 10,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            266
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            33
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            16
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 11,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            325
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            35
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            19
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 12,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            306
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            29
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            11
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 13,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            357
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 14,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            325
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            34
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 15,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            152
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            32
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            31
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 16,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "Form",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "Picture",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 17,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            207
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            103
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            59
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 18,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            993
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            131
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 19,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            232
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            30
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 20,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            375
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            47
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 21,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            485
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            55
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 22,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Table",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Picture",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 23,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            115
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            55
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 24,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            398
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            44
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            18
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 25,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            55
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02740188"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740188/_page_16_Picture_10.jpeg b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740188/_page_16_Picture_10.jpeg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..93b17bdc2f3b04ad1a624a3e4f2bcc4815effb98
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740188/_page_16_Picture_10.jpeg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:2f897b16428cf48af9380098bfa4061a5248070852369675d82b9baf3ea2463c
+size 11485
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740188/_page_22_Picture_4.jpeg b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740188/_page_22_Picture_4.jpeg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..69a17ef35c72f0d7f0f884e0196ca407ede534bd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740188/_page_22_Picture_4.jpeg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:bfe39b45daa1024b2e9ff1c7c18cb6c99bf8d75f5417adb0a875c09d17997fea
+size 11214
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740188/_page_6_Picture_18.jpeg b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740188/_page_6_Picture_18.jpeg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..22b3c5470f629fc73ac319e4220579215e30cc7f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740188/_page_6_Picture_18.jpeg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:6f6c436b5908502ada6db9e19f69a65edd65c8a6ccfdd9a6778531eca6a916d8
+size 18733
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740214/EFTA02740214.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740214/EFTA02740214.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5e813a0e42cffd33d44de16c5516243e3fc992dd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740214/EFTA02740214.md
@@ -0,0 +1,253 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CIV-80119-MARRA/M=
+
+JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+Related cases:
+
+08-80232, 08-08380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80993, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092
+
+## REPLY TO ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER'S P.A.'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S EMERGENCY MOTION FOR ORDER FOR THE PRESERVATION OF EVIDENCE IDE 4051 SAS TO JANE DOE v. EPSTEIN CASE NO.: 08-CIV- 80893)
+
+Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned attorneys, hereby files his Reply to Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler P.A.'s ("RRA") Response to Defendant's Emergency Motion for Order for the Preservation of Evidence [DE 405], and states:
+
+1. It now appears that the Honorable Herbert Stettin ("Mr. Stettin") is the sole individual, as the Chief Restructuring Officer, in charge of RRA assets, including electronic and paper records. There also appears to be no objection to the entry of the preservation order consistent with his fiduciary/trustee duties for RRA, although certain documents may no longer exist within his possession.
+
+2. Par. 4 of the response reflects that some 40 plus boxes of documents were obtained by the Department of Justice from search warrants served on the offices of RRA; "it is believed that the Department of Justice also sequestered about (13) boxes of documents related to this [Epstein] case." In fact there are three Epstein cases which have been brought by the RRA firm, one being in federal court, two in state court. Mr. Stettin confirms Defendant's belief that there are serious ethical and potentially criminal issues that may impact Plaintiffs' ability to pursue their cases.
+
+3. Unfortunately, time is critical with regard to this case in that there are deadlines to Disclose Experts and Exchange Reports by October 29, 2009 (but Plaintiff has not seen her expert, has no report and only made herself available for the Defendant's exam on November 13, 2009), deposition discovery deadline is November 28, 2009 and a calendar call of February 19, 2010 for the February 22, 2010 trial docket. While the undersigned understands that Mr. Stettin may be working expeditiously to deal with critical and pressing needs of stabilizing the firm, a delay of 45 days for his deposition (which has been set in the state court case in the 15th Judicial Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, State of Florida, L.M. v. Epstein, Case No. 502008CA028051XXXXMB AB, not the case subludice) will place his deposition sometime during the first 15 days of January, after every pre-trial deadline has expired.
+
+4. If in fact there has been inappropriate and/or illegal conduct associated with the prosecution of this case by RRA or any of its attorneys or by the Plaintff herself, which might result in sanctions, dismissal or other remedy, Defendant Epstein will be severely prejudiced.
+
+WHEREFORE, Defendant Epstein request that the court's preservation order be made permanent, which does not seem inconsistent with Mr. Stettin's position as expressed by his lawyers but deny the relief sought for delaying the deposition unless the court is disposed to modify the current scheduling deadlines and trial date that exist in this case.
+
+By: Robert D. ritton, Jr. . Florida tar #224162
+
+## Certificate of Service
+
+I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of recordidentified on the following Service List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on this /t1r day of November, 2009
+
+Respectfully subni ed,
+
+By: ROBERT D RITTON, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar No. 224162 rcrit@bc1claw.com MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 mpike@bciclaw.com BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTHER & COLEMAN 515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561/842-2820 Phone 561/515-3148 Fax (Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein)
+
+## Certificate of Service
+
+Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein Case No. 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON
+
+Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. Brad , Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler
+
+Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A.
+
+18205 Biscayne Boulevard
+
+Suite 2218
+
+Miami, FL 33160
+
+305-931-2200
+
+Fax: 305-931-0877
+
+ssmasexabuseattornev.com
+
+ahorowitz@sexabuseattornev.com
+
+Counsel for Plaintiffs
+
+In related Cases Nos. 08-80069, 08-80119,
+
+08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80993,
+
+08-80994
+
+Richard Horace Willits, Esq.
+
+Richard H. Willits, P.A.
+
+2290 10th Avenue North
+
+Suite 404
+
+Lake Worth, FL 33461
+
+561-582-7600
+
+Fax: 561-588-8819
+
+Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No.
+
+08-80811
+
+reelrhwaotmail.com
+
+Jack Scarola, Esq.
+
+Jack P. S Esq.
+
+Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
+
+2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
+
+West Palm Beach, FL 33409
+
+561-686-6300
+
+Fax: 561-383-9424
+
+jsx@searcylaw.com
+
+iatifasearcvlaw.com
+
+Counsel for Plaintiff C.M.A.
+
+Bruce Reinhart, Esq.
+
+Bruce E. Reinhart, P.A.
+
+250 S. Australian Avenue
+
+Suite 1400
+
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+
+561-202-6360
+
+Fax: 561-828-0983
+
+ecf@brucereinhartlaw.com
+
+401 East Las Olas Boulevard
+
+Suite 1650
+
+Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
+
+Phone: 954-522-3456
+
+Fax: 954-527-8663
+
+bedwardsQrra-law.com
+
+Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No.
+
+08-80893
+
+Paul G. Cassell, Esq.
+
+Pro Hac Vice
+
+332 South 1400 E, Room 101
+
+Salt Lake City, UT 84112
+
+801-585-5202
+
+801-585-6833 Fax
+
+cassellpQlaw.utah.edu
+
+Co-counsel for Plainti Vane Doe
+
+Isidro M. MN Esq.
+
+Law Firm, P.A.
+
+224 Datura Street, Suite 900
+
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+
+561-832-7732
+
+561-832-7137 F
+
+isidrogarciaQbellsouth.net
+
+Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No.
+
+08-80469
+
+Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq.
+
+Katherine W. Ezell, Esq.
+
+Podhurst Orseck, P.A.
+
+25 West Flagler Street, Suite 800
+
+Miami, FL 33130
+
+305 358-2800
+
+Fax: 305 358-2382
+
+riosefsbern@oodhurst.com
+
+kezellepodhurst.com
+
+Counsel for Plaintiffs in Related Cases
+
+Nos. 09-80591 and 09-80656
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq.
+
+Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
+
+250 Australian Avenue South
+
+Suite 1400
+
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012
+
+Counsel for Defendant
+
+Theodore J. Leopold, Esq.
+
+Spencer T. Kuvin, Esq.
+
+Leopold, Kuvin, P.A.
+
+2925 PGA Blvd., Suite 200
+
+Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410
+
+561-684-6500
+
+Fax: 561-515-2610
+
+Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No.
+
+08-08804
+
+561-659-8300
+
+Fax: 561-835-8691
+
+inesoabellsouth.net
+
+Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
+
+Charles H. Lichtman, Esq.
+
+Isaac Marcushamer, Esq.
+
+Berger Singerman, P.A.
+
+350 East Broward Boulevard, 10th Floor
+
+954-525-9900
+
+954-523-2872 Fax
+
+clichtmanabergersingennan.com
+
+imarcushamerebergersingerman.com
+
+Proposed Attorneys for Alleged Debtor
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740214/EFTA02740214.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740214/EFTA02740214.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..05e8e553628fa03c7b0ae71cf83a5720bf0957f2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740214/EFTA02740214.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,295 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740214.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 5,
+  "chars": 6662,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 3.45,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            200.124,
+            74.52
+          ],
+          [
+            413.99566650390625,
+            74.52
+          ],
+          [
+            413.99566650390625,
+            104.2330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            200.124,
+            104.2330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "REPLY TO ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER'S P.A.'S \nRESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S EMERGENCY MOTION FOR ORDER \nFOR THE PRESERVATION OF EVIDENCE IDE 4051 \nSAS TO JANE DOE v. EPSTEIN CASE NO.: 08-CIV- 80893)",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            113.83200000000001,
+            349.92
+          ],
+          [
+            504.4033508300781,
+            349.92
+          ],
+          [
+            504.4033508300781,
+            408.7330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            113.83200000000001,
+            408.7330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Certificate of Service",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            249.696,
+            239.76
+          ],
+          [
+            364.20050048828125,
+            239.76
+          ],
+          [
+            364.20050048828125,
+            254.2330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            249.696,
+            254.2330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Certificate of Service",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            251.53199999999998,
+            612.36
+          ],
+          [
+            365.70050048828125,
+            612.36
+          ],
+          [
+            365.70050048828125,
+            626.9830169677734
+          ],
+          [
+            251.53199999999998,
+            626.9830169677734
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            57
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            29
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            54
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            69
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            32
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            171
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            84
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            81
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            23
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02740214"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740219/EFTA02740219.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740219/EFTA02740219.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..11e4c386a06d84bf3bf61facfcb3df0921373407
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740219/EFTA02740219.md
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CIV-80119-MARRa
+
+JANE DOE NO. 2,
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+Related cases:
+
+08-80232, 08-08380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80993, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092
+
+## AGREED ORDER ON DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO ATTEND MEDIATION (AS TO CMA V. EPSTEIN AND , 08-CIV-80811)
+
+This matter came before the Court on Defendant Epstein's Motion to Attend Mediation and Plaintiffs counsel being in agreement with the entry of this order, it is HEREBY ORDERED and ADJUDGED that
+
+The court's no contact order, [DE 238], shall not preclude Defendant Epstein from attending Plaintiff deposition, mediation, or the trial of this case.
+
+DONE and ORDERED this day of , 2009
+
+Linnea R. United States Magistrate Judge
+
+Courtesy Copies: Judge Kenneth Marra Counsel of record
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740219/EFTA02740219.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740219/EFTA02740219.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..030a08be8a2c6c6fc4ddc6bdc3518cb23f12bda1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740219/EFTA02740219.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740219.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 1,
+  "chars": 882,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 0.71,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            203.796,
+            83.42999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            413.1453552246094,
+            83.42999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            413.1453552246094,
+            113.04998779296875
+          ],
+          [
+            203.796,
+            113.04998779296875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "AGREED ORDER ON DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO ATTEND MEDIATION \n(AS TO CMA V. EPSTEIN AND , 08-CIV-80811)",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            76.5,
+            359.64
+          ],
+          [
+            541.7826538085938,
+            359.64
+          ],
+          [
+            541.7826538085938,
+            389.79998779296875
+          ],
+          [
+            76.5,
+            389.79998779296875
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            57
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02740219"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740220/EFTA02740220.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740220/EFTA02740220.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f60cc0dd5d0d12081811c40436a28608195584a4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740220/EFTA02740220.md
@@ -0,0 +1,160 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CIV-80119-MARRA/
+
+JANE DOE NO. 2,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+Related cases:
+
+08-80232, 08-08380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80993, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092
+
+### DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO ATTEND MEDIATION AND MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT THEREOF (AS TO CMA v. EPSTEIN AND 08-CIV-80811]
+
+Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, by and through his undersigned attorneys, moves this Court for an order allowing him to attend mediation in the above-styled matter and as grounds set forth would state:
+
+- 1. The Court entered a no contact order which may apply to Carolyn Andriano, [DE 238].
+- 2. Plaintiffs counsel and plaintiff, have no objection to Mr. Epstein attending deposition, mediation and obviously trial.
+- 3. Therefore, Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, in an abundance of caution, requests that the court enter the attached proposed Agreed Order which shall not
+
+C.M.A. v. Epstein, et al. Page 2
+
+preclude him from attending Plaintiff trial of this case. deposition, mediation, or the
+
+# Rule 7.1 Certification
+
+Defense counsel has spoken with Plaintiffs counsel and he has no objection to the entry of the proposed agreed order.
+
+Robert D. ritton, Jr. Attorney r Defendant Epstein
+
+## Certificate of Service
+
+I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of recor ttentified on the following Service List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on thiL day of November 2009
+
+Respectfully submitt
+
+By: ROBERT D. ITTON, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar 224162 rcrit bciclaw.com MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 mpike@bcIclaw.com BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN 515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561/842-2820 Phone 561/515-3148 Fax (Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein)
+
+C.M.A. v. Epstein, et al.  
+Page 3
+
+**Certificate of Service**  
+**Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein**  
+**Case No. 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON**
+
+Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq.  
+Adam D. Horowitz, Esq.  
+Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A.  
+18205 Biscayne Boulevard  
+Suite 2218  
+Miami, FL 33160  
+305-931-2200  
+Fax: 305-931-0877  
+[ssm@sexabuseattorney.com](mailto:ssm@sexabuseattorney.com)  
+[ahorowitz@sexabuseattorney.com](mailto:ahorowitz@sexabuseattorney.com)
+
+*Counsel for Plaintiffs*  
+*In related Cases Nos. 08-80069, 08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80993, 08-80994*
+
+Richard Horace Willits, Esq.  
+Richard H. Willits, P.A.  
+2290 10<sup>th</sup> Avenue North  
+Suite 404  
+Lake Worth, FL 33461  
+561-582-7600  
+Fax: 561-588-8819  
+*Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-80811*  
+[reelrhw@hotmail.com](mailto:reelrhw@hotmail.com)
+
+Jack Scarola, Esq.  
+Jack P. ██████████, Esq.  
+Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.  
+2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard  
+West Palm Beach, FL 33409  
+561-686-6300  
+Fax: 561-383-9424  
+[jsx@searcylaw.com](mailto:jsx@searcylaw.com)  
+[jph@searcylaw.com](mailto:jph@searcylaw.com)  
+*Counsel for Plaintiff, C.M.A.*
+
+Brad ██████████ Esq.  
+Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler  
+401 East Las Olas Boulevard  
+Suite 1650  
+Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301  
+Phone: 954-522-3456  
+Fax: 954-527-8663  
+[bedwards@rra-law.com](mailto:bedwards@rra-law.com)  
+*Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-80893*
+
+Paul G. Cassell, Esq.  
+*Pro Hac Vice*  
+332 South 1400 E, Room 101  
+Salt Lake City, UT 84112  
+801-585-5202  
+801-585-6833 Fax  
+[cassellp@law.utah.edu](mailto:cassellp@law.utah.edu)  
+*Co-counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe*
+
+Isidro M. ██████████, Esq.  
+██████████ Law Firm, P.A.  
+224 Datura Street, Suite 900  
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401  
+561-832-7732  
+561-832-7137 F  
+[isidrogarcia@bellsouth.net](mailto:isidrogarcia@bellsouth.net)  
+*Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-80469*
+
+Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq.  
+Katherine W. Ezell, Esq.  
+Podhurst Orseck, P.A.  
+25 West Flagler Street, Suite 800  
+Miami, FL 33130  
+305 358-2800  
+Fax: 305 358-2382  
+[rjosefsberg@podhurst.com](mailto:rjosefsberg@podhurst.com)  
+[kezell@podhurst.com](mailto:kezell@podhurst.com)
+
+C.M.A. v. Epstein, et al.  
+Page 4
+
+Bruce Reinhart, Esq.  
+Bruce E. Reinhart, P.A.  
+250 S. Australian Avenue  
+Suite 1400  
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401  
+561-202-6360  
+Fax: 561-828-0983  
+[ecf@brucereinhartlaw.com](mailto:ecf@brucereinhartlaw.com)  
+*Counsel for Defendant* [REDACTED]
+
+Theodore J. Leopold, Esq.  
+Spencer T. Kuvin, Esq.  
+Leopold, Kuvin, P.A.  
+2925 PGA Blvd., Suite 200  
+Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410  
+561-684-6500  
+Fax: 561-515-2610  
+[skuvin@leopoldkuvin.com](mailto:skuvin@leopoldkuvin.com)  
+*Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No.*  
+*08-08804*
+
+*Counsel for Plaintiffs in Related Cases*  
+Nos. 09-80591 and 09-80656
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq.  
+Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.  
+250 Australian Avenue South  
+Suite 1400  
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012  
+561-659-8300  
+Fax: 561-835-8691  
+[jagesq@bellsouth.net](mailto:jagesq@bellsouth.net)  
+*Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein*
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740220/EFTA02740220.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740220/EFTA02740220.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..dc951ac05a87007c8b4fa75ffa0038cbac3c6855
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740220/EFTA02740220.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,280 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740220.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 4,
+  "chars": 5104,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 7.74,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            203.18400000000003,
+            72.67889404296875
+          ],
+          [
+            412.7508544921875,
+            72.67889404296875
+          ],
+          [
+            412.7508544921875,
+            100.93353271484375
+          ],
+          [
+            203.18400000000003,
+            100.93353271484375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO ATTEND MEDIATION \nAND MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT THEREOF \n(AS TO CMA v. EPSTEIN AND 08-CIV-80811]",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            153.0,
+            385.7989196777344
+          ],
+          [
+            467.04779052734375,
+            385.7989196777344
+          ],
+          [
+            467.04779052734375,
+            427.56353759765625
+          ],
+          [
+            153.0,
+            427.56353759765625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Rule 7.1 Certification",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            250.92000000000002,
+            162.5675048828125
+          ],
+          [
+            366.57135009765625,
+            162.5675048828125
+          ],
+          [
+            366.57135009765625,
+            177.54998779296875
+          ],
+          [
+            250.92000000000002,
+            177.54998779296875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Certificate of Service",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            266.21999999999997,
+            299.70000000000005
+          ],
+          [
+            390.4054260253906,
+            299.70000000000005
+          ],
+          [
+            390.4054260253906,
+            314.41998291015625
+          ],
+          [
+            266.21999999999997,
+            314.41998291015625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Certificate of Service Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein Case No. 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            189.72,
+            109.35000000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            421.0559999999999,
+            109.35000000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            421.0559999999999,
+            149.85000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            189.72,
+            149.85000000000002
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            9
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            65
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            31
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            19
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            19
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02740220"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740224/EFTA02740224.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740224/EFTA02740224.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..38ff6fa4b11bbeef14f3cae27a0b4816c82d6d3f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740224/EFTA02740224.md
@@ -0,0 +1,294 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 2.
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+Related Cases:
+
+08-80232, 08-08380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80993, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092
+
+PLAINTIFF, RESPONSE TO THIRD PARTY WITNESS, IGOR ZINOVIEW'S, MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW
+
+Plaintiff, by and through her undersigned counsel, hereby files her Response Third Party Witness, Igor Zinoview's, Motion For Protective Order and Incorporated Memorandum of Law (D.E. 402), and in support thereof states as follows:
+
+- 1. Third party witness, Igor Zinoview, seeks to have this Court enter an order preventing his deposition from going forward at all, or, in the alternative, limiting the scope of permissible questioning during same. Mr. Zinoview's deposition is presently scheduled to be taken on December 18, 2009.
+- 2. Mr. Zinoview has been employed by Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, as his "driver, bodyguard, and trainer" since November of 2005. See Affidavit of Igor Zinoview
+
+(D.E. 402) dated November 9, 2009. Mr. Zinoview argues that his deposition should not go forward as scheduled because Defendant Epstein has never discussed nor attempted to discuss with him "any facts or information related to any legal matters in which he [Jeffrey Epstein] is involved." Id. From Mr. Zinoview's vague assertion springs the bold yet erroneous argument that "Mr. Zinoview cannot possibly have any knowledge or information that is presently germane to this action."
+
+3. It should initially be noted that a "complete prohibition of a deposition is an extraordinary measure which should be resorted to only in rare occasions." Jennings v. Family Management, 201 F.R.D. 272 (D.D.C. 2001); See also, Salter v. Upjohn Co., 593 F.2d 649, 651 (591 Circ. 1979)(It is very unusual for trial court to prohibit the taking of a deposition altogether, and absent extraordinary circumstances, such order would likely be in error.)• Inv. Properties Intern., Ltd. v. IOS, Ltd., 459 F.2d. 705, 708 (2d Circ. 1972)("an order to vacate a notice of taking deposition is generally regarded as both unusual and unfavorable . . . "). Neither Mr. Zinoview's conclusory affidavit nor his Motion provide anything even approaching the "extraordinary circumstances" necessary to justify the entry of order precluding his deposition from going forward at all.
+
+4. Additionally, Mr. Zinoview's vague assertion that he and Defendant Epstein have never discussed any facts or information related to any legal matters that Mr. Epstein is involved in does not give rise to requisite "extraordinary circumstances" either. Detweiler Bros, Inc. v John Graham and Company, 412 F.Supp. 416 (E.D. Wash, 1976)(Plaintiff could not properly seek to prohibit defendant from deposing plaintiff's employee via a protective order on grounds that employee had no knowledge of matters at issue.) See also 8 Fed. Prac. & Proc. Civ. §2037, and "A witness ordinarily cannot escape examination by denying knowledge of any relevant facts, since the party seeking to take the deposition is entitled to test the witness's lack of knowledge.")
+
+5. The undersigned, as well as counsel for all of the other victims of Jeffrey Epstein, are entitled to question and challenge Mr. Zinoview on his purported lack of knowledge. Mr. Zinoview and plaintiffs' counsel very well might have a difference of opinion on what constitutes "facts and information related to any legal matters" in which Defendant Epstein is involved. The victims of Jeffrey Epstein ought not to be forced to accept Mr. Zinoview's opinion as to what constitutes "facts and information related to any legal matters" involving Jeffrey Epstein. Instead, plaintiffs should be able to explore these relevant matters directly with Mr. Zinoview, rather than being forced to rely on his twenty seven (27) word claim of lacking any knowledge.
+
+6. Additionally, Mr. Zinoview worked for Defendant Epstein during portions of the Palm Beach Police Department's months' long investigation which spanned from March 15, 2005 through February 2006 into the illegal sexual contact committed by Defendant Epstein against these minor plaintiffs. Accordingly, Mr. Zinoview certainly might have direct knowledge about what was going on in and around the Epstein residence during the time period in which he was employed by Defendant Epstein as his "driver, bodyguard, and trainer" while his employer was being investigated by law enforcement. Given the Defendant's voracious invocation of his Fifth Amendment privilege, the plaintiffs have consistently been denied the opportunity to seek any relevant information directly from Defendant Epstein himself. Rather, plaintiffs have been forced to build their cases against Mr. Epstein by other discovery methods, including deposing his employees who may have relevant information.
+
+7. Third party witness Igor Zinoview has failed to meet his very high burden of establishing "extraordinary circumstances." Mr. Zinoview has failed to demonstrate the "good cause" required by Rule 26(c) to protect a person from "annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden or expense" to overcome the liberal scope of permissible discovery. The above proposed lines of inquiry of Mr. Zinoview are certainly reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Accordingly, to the extent that it seeks to preclude his deposition from going forward at all, Mr. Zinoview's Motion should be denied
+
+8. Next, Mr. Zinoview also seeks to prevent questions being posed to him wherein he is first asked to "assume certain facts about which he has no knowledge," and then be asked about his "opinions about certain facts." First, it remains to be seen exactly what facts about which Mr. Zinoview has no knowledge. Second, Mr. Zinoview's opinions and beliefs about the factual matters surrounding plaintiffs' claims are relevant to exploring any potential bias and prejudice in favor of his employer and against Defendant Epstein's victims. For example, if Mr. Zinoview believes that these plaintiffs are simply inventing their claims against his employer that they were sexually victimized by Defendant Epstein while they were minor children, it very well might impact his impartiality as a witness. Third, the undersigned has no present intention of engaging in this line of questioning unless the proverbial "door" has been opened by Mr. Zinoview first. Lastly, counsel for Mr. Zinoview is certainly free to invoke the privileges afforded to him by the applicable procedural rules should he feel that his client is being asked inappropriate questions during the deposition.
+
+9. In conclusion and for the reasons cited above, Mr. Zinoview's Motion For Protective Order should be denied in its entirety.
+
+WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, respectfully requests that this Court deny Third Party Igor Zinoview's Motion For Protective Order.
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+/s/Jack P ■
+
+**JACK SCAROLA** 
+
+**Florida Bar No. 169440** 
+
+**JACK P.** 
+
+**Florida Bar No.: 0547808** 
+
+**Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.** 
+
+**2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard** 
+
+**West Palm Beach, Florida 33409** 
+
+**Phone: (561) 686-6300** 
+
+**Fax: (561) 383-9456** 
+
+**Attorneys for Plaintiff** 
+
+## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
+
+I HEREBY CERTIFY that on November 281h, 2009, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record identified below via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF.
+
+icklar:k P ■
+
+**Jack Scarola** 
+
+**Florida B No.: 169440** 
+
+**Jack P.**
+
+**Florida Bar No.: 0547808** 
+
+**Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.** 
+
+**2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard** 
+
+**West Palm Beach, Florida 33409** 
+
+**Phone: (561) 686-6300** 
+
+**Fax: (561) 383-9424** 
+
+**Attorneys for Plaintiff** 
+
+## Certificate of Service
+
+Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey E stein
+
+Case No. 08-CV-80119 -MARRA
+
+Stuart S. Mame!stein, Esq.
+
+Adam D. Horowitz, Esq.
+
+Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A.
+
+18205 Biscayne Boulevard
+
+Suite 2218
+
+Miami, FL 33160
+
+305-931-2200
+
+Fax: 305-931-0877
+
+ssm©sexabuseattornev,com
+
+ahorowitz®sexabuseattornev.corn
+
+Counsel for Plaintiffs
+
+In related Cases Nos. 08-80069, 08-80119,
+
+08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80993,
+
+08-80994
+
+Richard Horace Willits, Esq.
+
+Richard H. Willits, P.A.
+
+2290 10th Avenue North
+
+Suite 404
+
+Lake Worth, FL 33461
+
+561-582-7600
+
+Fax: 561-588-8819
+
+Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No.
+
+08-80811
+
+reelrhwahotmail.com
+
+Jack Scarola, Esq.
+
+Jack P. M, Esq.
+
+Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
+
+2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
+
+West Palm Beach, FL 33409
+
+561-686-6300
+
+Fax: 561-383-9424
+
+isx@searcvlaw.com
+
+ich@searcvlaw.com
+
+Counsel for Plaintiff C.M.A.
+
+Bruce Reinhart, Esq.
+
+Bruce E. Reinhart, P.A.
+
+250 S. Australian Avenue
+
+Suite 1400
+
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+
+Brad , Esq.
+
+Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler
+
+401 East Las Olas Boulevard
+
+Suite 1650
+
+Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
+
+Phone: 954-522-3456
+
+Fax: 954-527-8663
+
+bedwards©rra-law.com
+
+Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No.
+
+08-80893
+
+Paul G. Cassell, Esq.
+
+Pro Hac Vice
+
+332 South 1400 E, Room 101
+
+Salt Lake City, UT 84112 801-585-5202
+
+801-585-6833 Fax
+
+cassellp(glaw.utah.edu
+
+Co-counsel for PlaintiffJane Doe
+
+Isidro M. Esq.
+
+Law Firm, P.A.
+
+224 Datum Street, Suite 900
+
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+
+561-832-7732
+
+561-832-7137 F
+
+isidrogarcia®bellsouth.net
+
+Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No.
+
+08-80469
+
+Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq.
+
+Katherine W. Ezell, Esq.
+
+Podhurst Orseck, P.A.
+
+25 West Flagler Street, Suite 800
+
+Miami, FL 33130
+
+305 358-2800
+
+Fax: 305 358-2382
+
+riosefsbera©podhursLcom kezell®podhurst.com
+
+Counsel for Plaintiffs in Related Cases
+
+Nos. 09-80591 and 09-80656
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq.
+
+561-202-6360
+
+Fax: 561-828-0983
+
+ecf@brucereinhartlaw. om
+
+Counsel for Defendant
+
+Theodore J. Leopold, Esq.
+
+Spencer T. Kuvin, Esq,
+
+Leopold, Kuvin, P.A.
+
+2925 PGA Blvd., Suite 200
+
+Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410
+
+561-684-6500
+
+Fax: 561-515-2610
+
+skuvin@leopoldkuvin.cOm
+
+Counsel for Plaintiff In Related Case No.
+
+08-08804
+
+Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
+
+250 Australian Avenue South
+
+Suite 1400
+
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012
+
+561-659-8300
+
+Fax: 561-835-8691
+
+iakesa@bellsouth.net
+
+Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740224/EFTA02740224.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740224/EFTA02740224.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c7aba2c66f664fafe1fb37f698a8caaed2521bee
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740224/EFTA02740224.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,386 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740224.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 8,
+  "chars": 10432,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 4.09,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            202.572,
+            71.0675048828125
+          ],
+          [
+            409.7621765136719,
+            71.0675048828125
+          ],
+          [
+            409.7621765136719,
+            99.54998779296875
+          ],
+          [
+            202.572,
+            99.54998779296875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            225.216,
+            71.0675048828125
+          ],
+          [
+            387.0013122558594,
+            71.0675048828125
+          ],
+          [
+            387.0013122558594,
+            85.67999267578125
+          ],
+          [
+            225.216,
+            85.67999267578125
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Certificate \nof Service",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            252.144,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            368.7734375,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            368.7734375,
+            100.863037109375
+          ],
+          [
+            252.144,
+            100.863037109375
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            55
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            59
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            47
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            24
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            47
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            24
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            40
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            20
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            15
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            38
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            18
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            177
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            87
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            80
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            47
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            24
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            22
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02740224"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740232/EFTA02740232.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740232/EFTA02740232.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6bacae24bb18472c90c8d0414bdaeb5e19138a16
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740232/EFTA02740232.md
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO. 08-CIV-80119-MARRA/I
+
+JANE DOE NO. 2,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+Related cases:
+
+08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994,
+
+08-80993, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469,
+
+09-80591, 09-80656, 0940802, 09-81092
+
+![](_page_0_Picture_8.jpeg)
+
+## OMNIBUS ORDER
+
+THIS CAUSE is before the Court on the following motions: (1) Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Plaintiffs Motion to Compel filed March 6, 2009 (D.E. #54 in Case No. 08-80232 and D.E. #64 in Case No. 08-80381); (2) Defendant's Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages with Proposed Order filed March 18, 2009 (D.E. #55 in Case No. 08-80232 and D.E. #65 in Case No. 08-80381); (3) Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply to Response to Motion to Compel (D.E. #62 in Case No. 08-80232 and D.E. #72 in Case No. 08-80381); (4) Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Answers to Interrogatories and Requests for Production filed March 2, 2009 ( D.E. #61 in Case No. 08-80381); (5) Plaintiffs Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Defendant's Motion to Compel filed April 17, 2009
+
+(D.E. #71 in Case #08-80232 and D.E. #75 in Case #08-80381); (6) Plaintiffs Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Defendant's Motion to Compel filed April 29, 2009 (D.E. #79 in Case #08-80232; D.E. #79 in Case #08-80381; D.E. # 43 in Case #08-80993; and, D.E. #33 in Case #08-80994); (7) Defendant's Motion to File Reply to Response to Motion to Compel filed May 18, 2009 (D.E. #92 in Case #08-80232; D.E. #94 in Case #08-80381; and, D.E. #49 in Case #08-80994); (8) Third Party Zinoview's Motion for Protective Order filed November 9, 2009 (D.E. #131 in Case #08-80232; D.E. #132 in Case #08-80381; and, D.E. #84 in Case #08-80994); (9) Defendant's Motion to Compel Response to First Request for Production filed April 2, 2009 (D.E. #59 in 08-80232; D.E. #69 in 08-80381; D.E. #26 in 08-80993; and, D.E. #24 in 08-80994); and (10) Defendant's Motion to Compel Response to First Set of Interrogatories filed April 2, 2009 (D.E. #60 in 08-80232; D.E. #70 in 08-80381; D.E. #27 in 08-80993; and, D.E. #25 in 08-80994).
+
+Having reviewed the pleadings filed incident to these matters, and being otherwise duly advised in the premises, it is hereby
+
+ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:
+
+- (1) Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Plaintiffs Motion to Compel filed March 6, 2009 (D.E. #54 in Case No. 08- 80232 and D.E. #64 in Case No. 08-80381) is GRANTED nunc pro tune;
+- (2) Defendant's Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages with Proposed Order filed March 18, 2009 (D.E. #55 in Case No. 08-80232 and D.E. #65 in Case No. 08-80381) is GRANTED nunc pro tunc;
+- (3) Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply to
+
+Response to Motion to Compel (D.E. #62 in Case No. 08-80232 and D.E. #72 in Case No. 08-80381) is GRANTED nunc pro tune;
+
+- (4) Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Answers to Interrogatories and Requests for Production filed March 2, 2009 ( D.E. #61 in Case No. 08-80381) is DENIED AS MOOT;
+- (5) Plaintiffs Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Defendant's Motion to Compel filed April 17, 2009 (D.E. #71 in Case #08- 80232 and D.E. #75 in Case #08-80381) is GRANTED nunc pro tune;
+- (6) Plaintiffs Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Defendant's Motion to Compel filed April 29, 2009 (D.E. #79 in Case #08- 80232; D.E. #79 in Case #08-80381; D.E. # 43 in Case #08-80993; and, D.E. #33 in Case #08-80994) is GRANTED nunc pm tune;
+- (7) Defendant's Motion to File Reply to Response to Motion to Compel filed May 18, 2009 (D.E. #92 in Case #08-80232; D.E. #94 in Case #08-80381; and, D.E. #49 in Case #08-80994) is GRANTED nunc pro tune;
+- (8) Third Party Zinoview's Motion for Protective Order filed November 9, 2009 (D.E. #131 in Case #08-80232; D.E. #132 in Case #08-80381; and, D.E. #84 in Case #08-80994) is DENIED AS MOOT;
+- (9) Defendant's Motion to Compel Response to First Request for Production filed April 2, 2009 (D.E. #59 in 08-80232; D.E. #69 in 08-80381; D.E. #26 in 08-80993; and, D.E. #24 in 08-80994) is STRICKEN as a duplicate filing as the identical Motion has been filed correctly in the lead case file of 08-80119
+
+at D.E. #210. An order on D.E. #210 shall be issued shortly; and,
+
+- (10) Defendant's Motion to Compel Response to First Set of Interrogatories filed April 2, 2009 (D.E. #60 in 08-80232; D.E. #70 in 08-80381; D.E. #27 in 08- 80993; and, D.E. #25 in 08-80994) is STRICKEN as a duplicate filing as the identical Motion has been filed correctly in the lead case file of 08-80119 at D.E. #212. An order on D.E. #212 shall be issued shortly.
+
+DONE AND ORDERED this December 16, 2009 ii, at West Palm Beach,
+
+Florida.
+
+LINNEA R. JOH N UNITED STATE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
+
+CC: The Honorable Kenneth A. Marra All Counsel of Record
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740232/EFTA02740232.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740232/EFTA02740232.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9e7084aeb9c704b0a3e77e5b683864b3f63221cf
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740232/EFTA02740232.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,241 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740232.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 4,
+  "chars": 4954,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 0.99,
+  "image_assets": [
+    "_page_0_Picture_8.jpeg"
+  ],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            195.57,
+            69.5675048828125
+          ],
+          [
+            404.1507263183594,
+            69.5675048828125
+          ],
+          [
+            404.1507263183594,
+            99.17999267578125
+          ],
+          [
+            195.57,
+            99.17999267578125
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "OMNIBUS ORDER",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            246.615,
+            396.09000000000003
+          ],
+          [
+            356.8642272949219,
+            396.09000000000003
+          ],
+          [
+            356.8642272949219,
+            411.54998779296875
+          ],
+          [
+            246.615,
+            411.54998779296875
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            60
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            11
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Picture",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            49
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            49
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            29
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            15
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02740232"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740232/_page_0_Picture_8.jpeg b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740232/_page_0_Picture_8.jpeg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..75195eecf5235b03f889b838e1ba0f499dc2c672
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740232/_page_0_Picture_8.jpeg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:26e766dc07a130bf55af2f83dffea083f267e001a5df2caf615f6e0c4886476e
+size 10655
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740236/EFTA02740236.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740236/EFTA02740236.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5361eb65f563f020d376dbc8678e3da617419644
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740236/EFTA02740236.md
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-80232-Civ-Marra/.
+
+JANE DOE NO.3,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## ORDER
+
+![](_page_0_Picture_8.jpeg)
+
+THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion To Compel Answers To Interrogatories And Production Of Documents, And Incorporated Memorandum Of Law In Support, (D/E 51). Accordingly, it is hereby,
+
+ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Motion To Compel Answers To Interrogatories And Production Of Documents, And Incorporated Memorandum Of Law In Support, (DE 51) is DENIED AS MOOT.
+
+DONE AND ORDERED in 2010. at West Palm Beach, Florida this 5th day of February,
+
+Copies furnished to: All Counsel of Record
+
+LINNEA R. JO SON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740236/EFTA02740236.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740236/EFTA02740236.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7760d848b8ff15c88f64f398030c873d7d251feb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740236/EFTA02740236.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,115 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740236.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 1,
+  "chars": 748,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 0.76,
+  "image_assets": [
+    "_page_0_Picture_8.jpeg"
+  ],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            201.105,
+            68.03999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            403.44000000000005,
+            68.03999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            403.44000000000005,
+            97.19999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            201.105,
+            97.19999999999999
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "ORDER",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            277.98,
+            287.54999999999995
+          ],
+          [
+            324.72,
+            287.54999999999995
+          ],
+          [
+            324.72,
+            302.13
+          ],
+          [
+            277.98,
+            302.13
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            166
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            11
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Picture",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02740236"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740236/_page_0_Picture_8.jpeg b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740236/_page_0_Picture_8.jpeg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3fce8e9cd9e338f6b3dda440529eab15f8e47d0c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740236/_page_0_Picture_8.jpeg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:d936ccf1d9a4f87a2e3cfc9d149675377da7a3f73da03fc8e4e065cc5018a707
+size 11596
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740237/EFTA02740237.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740237/EFTA02740237.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1f7934066df3775848c0d665c570fb5e4c51d312
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740237/EFTA02740237.md
@@ -0,0 +1,166 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO. 08-CIV —MARFtAtEl=
+
+JANE DOE,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+/
+
+# NOTICE OF TAKING VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION
+
+PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Plaintiff, JANE DOE, will take the deposition of Jean Luc Bruhel on Tuesday, September 22, 2009, at 10:00 a.m., at
+
+Esquire Court Reporters One Penn Plaza Suite 4715 New York, NY 10119
+
+The deposition shall be conducted pursuant to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure and shall continue day to day, weekends and holidays excepted, until completed.
+
+I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been served by U.S. Mail and email transmission this WAlay of August, 2009 to all those on the attached Service List.
+
+ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER
+
+Attorneys for Plaintiff 401 East Las Olas Blvd., Suite 1650 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Tel: (954) 522-3456 Fax: (954) 527-8663 Email: bedwardsOrra-law.com
+
+By:
+
+oc: Esquire Court Reporters
+
+AO HA (Rev. 01/09) Subpoena to Testify et a Deposition or to Produce Documents in a Civil Action
+
+# UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
+
+for the
+
+Southern District of Florida
+
+JANE DOE
+
+Plaintiff
+
+v.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN
+
+Defendant
+
+Civil Action No. 08-90893CIV-MARRA/JOHNSO
+
+(tfike action is pending in another district, state where:
+
+## SUBPOENA TO TESTIFY AT A DEPOSITION OR TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS IN A CIVIL ACTION
+
+To: Jean Luc Bruhel, 301 E. 66th Street, New York, NY
+
+ef Testimony: YOU ARE COMMANDED to appear at the time, date, and place set forth below to testify at a deposition to be talcea in this civil action. If you are an organization that is not a party in this case, you must designate one or more officers, directors, or managing agents, or designate other persons who consent to testify on your behalf about the following matters, or those set forth in an attachment:
+
+| Place: Esquire Court Reporters, One Penn Plaza<br>Suite 4715, New York, NY | Date and Time:<br>09/22/2009 10:00 am |
+|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
+|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
+
+The deposition will be recorded by this method:
+
+O Production: You, or your representatives, must also bring with you to the deposition the following documents, electronically stored information, or objects, and permit their inspection, copying, testing, or sampling of the material:
+
+The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(c), relating to your protection as a person subject to a subpoena, and Rule 45 (d) and (e), relating to your duty to respond to this subpoena and the potential consequences of not doing so, are attached.
+
+Date: CLERK OF COURT
+
+OR
+
+Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk Attorney's signature
+
+The name, address, e-mail, and telephone number of the attorney representing (none of party)
+
+, who issues or requests this subpoena, are:
+
+Brad , Esq., Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, 401 E. Las Olas Blvd., Suite 1650, Fort Lauderdale. Florida 33301 Bedwards@rra-law.com. (954) 522 2346
+
+AO SSA (Rev. 01109) Subpoena to Testify at a Deposition or to Produce Documents in a Civil Action (Page 2)
+
+Civil Action No. 08-90893CIV-MARRAM0HNS0
+
+### PROOF OF SERVICE
+
+(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 45.)
+
+This subpoena for (name of individual and tide, if any) was received by me on (date)
+
+O I personally served the subpoena on the individual at (Place) on (date) ; or
+
+O I left the subpoena at the individual's residence or usual place of abode with (name) , a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there, on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual's last known address; or
+
+O I served the subpoena on (name of individual) , who is designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization) on (dale) ; or
+
+O 1 returned the subpoena unexecuted because ; or
+
+O Other (specify):
+
+Unless the subpoena was issued on behalf of the United States, or one of its officers or agents, I have also tendered to the witness fees for one day's attendance, and the mileage allowed by law, in the amount of
+
+My fees are \$ for travel and \$ for services, for a total of \$ 0.00
+
+Date:
+
+I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.
+
+Server's signature
+
+Printed name and title
+
+Server's address
+
+Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:
+
+**Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45 (c), (d), and (e) (Effective 12/1/07)(c) Protecting a Person Subject to a Subpoena.****(1) Avoiding Undue Burden or Expense; Sanctions.** A party or attorney responsible for issuing and serving a subpoena must take reasonable steps to avoid imposing undue burden or expense on a person subject to the subpoena. The issuing court must enforce this duty and impose an appropriate sanction — which may include lost earnings and reasonable attorney's fees — on a party or attorney who fails to comply.
+
+**(2) Command to Produce Materials or Permit Inspection.****(A) Appearance Not Required.** A person commanded to produce documents, electronically stored information, or tangible things, or to permit the inspection of premises, need not appear in person at the place of production or inspection unless also commanded to appear for a deposition, hearing, or trial.
+
+**(B) Objections.** A person commanded to produce documents or tangible things or to permit inspection may serve on the party or attorney designated in the subpoena a written objection to inspecting, copying, testing or sampling any or all of the materials or to inspecting the premises — or to producing electronically stored information in the form or forms requested. The objection must be served before the earlier of the time specified for compliance or 14 days after the subpoena is served. If an objection is made, the following rules apply:
+
+(i) At any time, on notice to the commanded person, the serving party may move the issuing court for an order compelling production or inspection.
+
+(ii) These acts may be required only as directed in the order, and the order must protect a person who is neither a party nor a party's officer from significant expense resulting from compliance.
+
+**(3) Quashing or Modifying a Subpoena.****(A) When Required.** On timely motion, the issuing court must quash or modify a subpoena that:
+
+- (i) fails to allow a reasonable time to comply;
+- (ii) requires a person who is neither a party nor a party's officer to travel more than 100 miles from where that person resides, is employed, or regularly transacts business in person — except that, subject to Rule 45(c)(3)(B)(iii), the person may be commanded to attend a trial by traveling from any such place within the state where the trial is held;
+- (iii) requires disclosure of privileged or other protected matter, if no exception or waiver applies; or
+- (iv) subjects a person to undue burden.
+
+**(B) When Permitted.** To protect a person subject to or affected by a subpoena, the issuing court may, on motion, quash or modify the subpoena if it requires:
+
+- (i) disclosing a trade secret or other confidential research, development, or commercial information;
+- (ii) disclosing an unretained expert's opinion or information that does not describe specific occurrences in dispute and results from the expert's study that was not requested by a party; or
+- (iii) a person who is neither a party nor a party's officer to incur substantial expense to travel more than 100 miles to attend trial.
+
+**(C) Specifying Conditions as an Alternative.** In the circumstances described in Rule 45(c)(3)(B), the court may, instead of quashing or modifying a subpoena, order appearance or production under specified conditions if the serving party:
+
+- (i) shows a substantial need for the testimony or material that cannot be otherwise met without undue hardship; and
+- (ii) ensures that the subpoenad person will be reasonably compensated.
+
+**(d) Duties in Responding to a Subpoena.****(1) Producing Documents or Electronically Stored Information.** These procedures apply to producing documents or electronically stored information:
+
+**(A) Documents.** A person responding to a subpoena to produce documents must produce them as they are kept in the ordinary course of business or must organize and label them to correspond to the categories in the demand.
+
+**(B) Form for Producing Electronically Stored Information Not Specified.** If a subpoena does not specify a form for producing electronically stored information, the person responding must produce it in a form or forms in which it is ordinarily maintained or in a reasonably usable form or forms.
+
+**(C) Electronically Stored Information Produced in Only One Form.** The person responding need not produce the same electronically stored information in more than one form.
+
+**(D) Inaccessible Electronically Stored Information.** The person responding need not provide discovery of electronically stored information from sources that the person identifies as not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. On motion to compel discovery or for a protective order, the person responding must show that the information is not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. If that showing is made, the court may nonetheless order discovery from such sources if the requesting party shows good cause, considering the limitations of Rule 26(b)(2)(C). The court may specify conditions for the discovery.
+
+**(2) Claiming Privilege or Protection.****(A) Information Withheld.** A person withholding subpoenad information under a claim that it is privileged or subject to protection as trial-preparation material must:
+
+- (i) expressly make the claim; and
+- (ii) describe the nature of the withheld documents, communications, or tangible things in a manner that, without revealing information itself privileged or protected, will enable the parties to assess the claim.
+
+**(B) Information Produced.** If information produced in response to a subpoena is subject to a claim of privilege or of protection as trial-preparation material, the person making the claim may notify any party that received the information of the claim and the basis for it. After being notified, a party must promptly return, sequester, or destroy the specified information and any copies it has; must not use or disclose the information until the claim is resolved; must take reasonable steps to retrieve the information if the party disclosed it before being notified; and may promptly present the information to the court under seal for a determination of the claim. The person who produced the information must preserve the information until the claim is resolved.
+
+**(e) Contempt.** The issuing court may hold in contempt a person who, having been served, fails without adequate excuse to obey the subpoena. A nonparty's failure to obey must be excused if the subpoena purports to require the nonparty to attend or produce at a place outside the limits of Rule 45(c)(3)(A)(ii).
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740237/EFTA02740237.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740237/EFTA02740237.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ee7fdf011bd5037d95d32ca4443122c0bc00c8fe
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740237/EFTA02740237.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,464 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740237.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 5,
+  "chars": 11075,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 22.9,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            197.06400000000002,
+            118.25999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            402.87298583984375,
+            118.25999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            402.87298583984375,
+            147.8035888671875
+          ],
+          [
+            197.06400000000002,
+            147.8035888671875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "NOTICE OF TAKING VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            169.524,
+            353.96999999999997
+          ],
+          [
+            437.3489074707031,
+            353.96999999999997
+          ],
+          [
+            437.3489074707031,
+            370.55352783203125
+          ],
+          [
+            169.524,
+            370.55352783203125
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            170.74800000000002,
+            79.99407958984375
+          ],
+          [
+            430.0708923339844,
+            79.99407958984375
+          ],
+          [
+            430.0708923339844,
+            100.53924560546875
+          ],
+          [
+            170.74800000000002,
+            100.53924560546875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "SUBPOENA TO TESTIFY AT A DEPOSITION \nOR TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS IN A CIVIL ACTION",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            168.3,
+            225.99000000000004
+          ],
+          [
+            432.4880676269531,
+            225.99000000000004
+          ],
+          [
+            432.4880676269531,
+            250.9541015625
+          ],
+          [
+            168.3,
+            250.9541015625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "PROOF OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            246.02400000000003,
+            105.653076171875
+          ],
+          [
+            353.3990783691406,
+            105.653076171875
+          ],
+          [
+            353.3990783691406,
+            117.8341064453125
+          ],
+          [
+            246.02400000000003,
+            117.8341064453125
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45 (c), (d), and (e) (Effective 12/1/07)",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            143.20800000000003,
+            98.01
+          ],
+          [
+            452.88,
+            98.01
+          ],
+          [
+            452.88,
+            110.16000000000003
+          ],
+          [
+            143.20800000000003,
+            110.16000000000003
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "(c) Protecting a Person Subject to a Subpoena.",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            41.004000000000005,
+            117.44999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            222.15599999999998,
+            117.44999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            222.15599999999998,
+            128.79
+          ],
+          [
+            41.004000000000005,
+            128.79
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "(2) Command to Produce Materials or Permit Inspection.",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            50.79600000000001,
+            200.88
+          ],
+          [
+            264.996,
+            200.88
+          ],
+          [
+            264.996,
+            212.22000000000003
+          ],
+          [
+            50.79600000000001,
+            212.22000000000003
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "(3) Quashing or Modifying a Subpoena.",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            47.124,
+            421.20000000000005
+          ],
+          [
+            198.288,
+            421.20000000000005
+          ],
+          [
+            198.288,
+            432.54
+          ],
+          [
+            47.124,
+            432.54
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "(d) Duties in Responding to a Subpoena.",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            302.328,
+            116.63999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            460.836,
+            116.63999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            460.836,
+            127.98000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            302.328,
+            127.98000000000002
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "(2) Claiming Privilege or Protection.",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            308.448,
+            387.98999999999995
+          ],
+          [
+            447.98400000000004,
+            387.98999999999995
+          ],
+          [
+            447.98400000000004,
+            400.14
+          ],
+          [
+            308.448,
+            400.14
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            47
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            24
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            11
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            21
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            11
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            86
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            39
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            23
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Form",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            66
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            17
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            42
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02740237"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740242/EFTA02740242.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740242/EFTA02740242.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2a33cfc5f05186992b443e431a6ea8b4a171e019
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740242/EFTA02740242.md
@@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
+IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15<sup>TH</sup>  
+JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM  
+BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
+
+B.B.,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+Case No: 502008CA37319XXXX MB AB
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+**PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF TAKING VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION**
+
+PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT THE UNDERSIGNED ATTORNEY WILL TAKE THE DEPOSITION OF:
+
+**NAME:**
+
+Jean Luc Bruhel
+
+**DATE AND TIME:**
+
+November 3, 2009  
+10:00 AM
+
+**LOCATION:**
+
+Esquire Court Reporters  
+515 N. Flagler Drive  
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+
+upon an oral examination before a Notary Public or officer authorized by law to take depositions in the State of New York. The oral examination will continue from day to day until completed. The depositions are being taken for purposes of discovery, for use at trial or are being taken for such other purposes as are permitted under the Rules of the Court.
+
+**WE HEREBY CERTIFY** that a true and correct copy of this Notice was mailed this 9 day of October, 2009 to: Jack A. Goldberger, Esq., 250 Australian Avenue, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 334101; Bruce E. Reinhart, Esq., 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401; Robert D. Critton, Jr., Michael J. Pike, 515 North Flagler Drive, Suite 400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401.
+
+LEOPOLD-KUVIN, P.A.  
+2925 PGA Boulevard, Suite 200  
+Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410  
+(561) 515-1400  
+(561) 515-1401
+
+By:
+
+![]()*CO - JE - DT  
+Hay Jew*
+
+Por
+
+## IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION
+
+L.M., )
+
+)
+
+Plaintiff, ) CASE NO.: 502008DA028051XXXXMB AD
+
+)
+
+vs. )
+
+)
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN, )
+
+)
+
+Defendant. )
+
+)
+
+## NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION
+
+PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the attorney for Defendant in the above-styled cause will take the deposition of Jean Luc Bruhnel on November 3, 2009 at 10:00 a.m. for the purposes of discovery at the following location:
+
+Esquire Court Reporters 515 N Flagler Dr West Palm Beach, FL 33401-4321
+
+Said deposition will be taken before Esquire Court Reporters, a Notary Public or any officer authorized to administer oaths by the laws of the State of Florida, and a person who is neither a relative, nor employee, nor attorney, nor counsel of any of the parties and who is neither a relative nor employee of such attorney or counsel, and who is not financially interested in the action.
+
+Said deposition will be taken pursuant to Florida Rules of Civil Procedure in such cases provided. Said oral examination will continue from hour to hour and from day to day until completed.
+
+Case No. 502008CA028051XXXXMB AD
+
+CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
+
+I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been served via U.S. Mail and Facsimile this 7th day of October, 2009 to: Michael Burman, Esq., & Robert D. Critton, Jr., Esq., **Burman, Critton, et al.**, 515 North Flagler Drive, Suite 400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401; Jay Howell, Esq., **Jay Howell & Assoc.**, 644 Cesery Boulevard, Suite 250, Jacksonville, FL 32211; and Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq., **Atterbury Goldberger et al.**, 250 Australian Ave. South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 and a courtesy copy to Tama Kudman, Esq., 444 PGA Boulevard, Suite 600, West Palm Beach, Florida 33410.
+
+ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER  
+Attorneys for Plaintiff  
+401 East Las Olas Blvd., Suite 1650  
+Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33394  
+Telephone (954) 522-3456  
+Telecopier (954) 527-8663
+
+By:
+
+![]()![]()
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740242/EFTA02740242.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740242/EFTA02740242.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7d75c33c69bb4cea131e8e537ae8bd5f240d3e73
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740242/EFTA02740242.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,323 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740242.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 3,
+  "chars": 3402,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 7.09,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15 TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            307.224,
+            90.72
+          ],
+          [
+            512.856,
+            90.72
+          ],
+          [
+            512.856,
+            131.22
+          ],
+          [
+            307.224,
+            131.22
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF TAKING VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            146.88,
+            257.58
+          ],
+          [
+            488.98800000000006,
+            257.58
+          ],
+          [
+            488.98800000000006,
+            271.35
+          ],
+          [
+            146.88,
+            271.35
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "NAME:",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            95.47200000000001,
+            305.37
+          ],
+          [
+            140.148,
+            305.37
+          ],
+          [
+            140.148,
+            317.52
+          ],
+          [
+            95.47200000000001,
+            317.52
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "DATE AND TIME:",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            245.412,
+            305.37
+          ],
+          [
+            344.556,
+            305.37
+          ],
+          [
+            344.556,
+            317.52
+          ],
+          [
+            245.412,
+            317.52
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "LOCATION:",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            394.74,
+            305.37
+          ],
+          [
+            465.73199999999997,
+            305.37
+          ],
+          [
+            465.73199999999997,
+            317.52
+          ],
+          [
+            394.74,
+            317.52
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT \nIN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA \nCIVIL DIVISION",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            163.671,
+            107.73000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            467.5461730957031,
+            107.73000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            467.5461730957031,
+            147.20556640625
+          ],
+          [
+            163.671,
+            147.20556640625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "NOTICE OF TAKING DEPOSITION",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            223.13199999999998,
+            311.85
+          ],
+          [
+            407.82989501953125,
+            311.85
+          ],
+          [
+            407.82989501953125,
+            324.945556640625
+          ],
+          [
+            223.13199999999998,
+            324.945556640625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            220.93199999999996,
+            109.35000000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            367.812,
+            109.35000000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            367.812,
+            122.30999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            220.93199999999996,
+            122.30999999999999
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            67
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            41
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            33
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            61
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            31
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            17
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            50
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02740242"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740245/EFTA02740245.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740245/EFTA02740245.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..df79e3c224d100792933dcf334f3afc2c32359a6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740245/EFTA02740245.md
@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+JANE DOE,
+
+CASE NO. 08-CV-80893-CIV-MARRA/JOHNS ON
+
+Plaintiff vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN, et al.
+
+Defendant.
+
+Related Cases: 08080119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092
+
+## NON-PARTY, JEAN LUC BRUHNEL'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF JANE DOE'S MOTION FOR AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND FOR AIQII COMPEL AND 1N( PORATM MEMORANDUM F LAW
+
+Non-party Jean Luc Bruhnel hereby files his Response to Plaintiff, Jane Doe's Motion for an Order to Show Cause and for an Order to Compel and Incorporated Memorandum of Law which was filed on March 10, 2010. (DE#483). Plaintiffs counsel seeks to compel Mr. Bruhnel, a citizen who is not a party to the instant action, to sit for a deposition that was canceled and for which he has never been re-noticed. This motion is premature at best, and frivolous.
+
+While visiting New York, Mr. Bruhnel was served with a Subpoena and Notice of Videotape Deposition in this matter.' As a courtesy, undersigned counsel for Mr. Bruhnel
+
+<sup>&#</sup>x27; Please see Exhibit A, annexed hereto and incorporated by reference.
+
+agreed to produce Mr. Bruhnel for deposition in Florida on November 3, 2010 for the convenience of the parties because Mr. Bruhnel had plans to travel to Florida at that time. The videotape deposition was accordingly canceled. Two new deposition notices were then e-mailed to counsel for Bruhnel, both of which emanated from related cases in Florida Circuit Court, with no additional notice emanating from the instant matter before this Court. <sup>2</sup> That scheduled deposition was then canceled by agreement of the parties, who mutually agreed that plaintiff's counsel's secretary would call counsel for Mr. Bruhnel to reset the deposition.
+
+Neither plaintiff's counsel nor his secretary called to reschedule the deposition until January, 2010. In the intervening time, all depositions in the myriad related matters had been canceled, upon information and belief, due to the scandal involving plaintiff's counsel's previous law partner. Further, Mr. Bruhnel had left the United States with no firm plan to return, which was conveyed to plaintiff's counsel during a telephone conversation in January.
+
+Mr. Bruhnel's counsel attempted to secure firm dates on which Mr. Bruhnel would be traveling to the United States, but was unable to do so. Undersigned counsel accordingly informed planitiff's counsel that she could not secure any firm dates. When plaintiff's counsel insisted that Mr. Bruhnel provide deposition dates, plaintiff's counsel was informed that Mr. Bruhnel could not be compelled to return to the United States. Undersigned counsel told plaintiff's counsel that there were appropriate mechanisms through which he could secure Mr.
+
+<sup>2</sup> Please see Exhibit B, annexed hereto and incorporated by reference.
+
+Bruhnel's testimony abroad pursuant to Florida, Federal and International law. Indeed, undersigned counsel directed plaintiff's counsel to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure and the Hague Convention, each of which provide specific mechanisms for the securing of testimony abroad.
+
+Plaintiff's counsel has never served Mr. Bruhnel or undersigned counsel with a re-notice for deposition since the cancellation of the prior scheduled depositions, and has never attempted to avail himself of proper legal procedures to secure Mr. Bruhnel's testimony abroad. Further, contrary to plaintiff's counsel's Certification to this court, plaintiff's counsel never conferred with undersigned counsel for Mr. Bruhnel regarding the instant Order to Show Cause and for an Order to Compel.
+
+## MEMORANDUM OF LAW
+
+As stated above, the previously scheduled depositions were canceled by agreement of the parties herein and Mr. Bruhnel has never been re-noticed for deposition. The motion currently before the court is therefore premature and frivolous. Regardless, it is respectfully noted that the Court lacks authority to compel Mr. Bruhnel to return to the United States for deposition. Indeed, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure specifically decline to confer upon the Court the power to compel foreign nationals to appear before it. See Fed. Rules Civ.Proc. Rule 45. 28 USC 41783.
+
+The Florida Rules of Civil Procedure and the Hague Convention, however, have each
+
+adopted procedural rules to facilitate the deposition of a non-party foreign national. Indeed, The Uniform Foreign Depositions Act, as adopted by Florida in section 92.251 ("UFDL") provides a road map for litigants seeking to secure evidence from foreign non-party witnesses, stating
+
+(2) Whenever any mandate, writ or commission is issued out of any court of record in any other state, territory, district, or foreign jurisdiction, or whenever upon notice or agreement it is required to take the testimony of a witness or witnesses in this state, witnesses may be compelled to appear and testify in the same manner and by the same process and proceeding as may be employed for the purposes of taking testimony in proceedings pending in this state.
+
+§ 92.251 Florida statutes.
+
+Thus, whenever a Florida litigant desires to depose a witness residing in another state, that litigant must first secure the appointment of a commissioner from the court where the litigation originates. See Freedom Newspapers, Inc. 507 So.2d 1180 (Fla 2d DCA 1987), at 1183. The foreign litigant may then apply to the court having personal jurisdiction over the witness for the process necessary to secure the attendance of the witness. Id. (citing Travelers Indem. Co. v. •, 388 So.2d 648 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980)). See Greenlight Financial Services. Inc. v. Union America M ortg., Inc,. 971 So.2d 983 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008). This may be done through mechanisms provided via The Hague Convention, to which France is a signatory. Given that several cases are currently pending in Florida Circuit Court that are related to the instant matter, plaintiff may avail herself of this mechanism to secure Mr. Bruhnel's testimony, but has chosen not to. Accordingly, there has been no malfeasance herein by Mr. Bruhnel or his counsel, only nonfeasance by plaintiffs counsel.
+
+Plaintiff's counsel has misrepresented to this court that he spoke to Mr. Bruhnel's counsel about this motion prior to filing it with the Court. Undersigned counsel for Mr. Bruhnel was never notified in any manner that any such motion was being prepared or filed.
+
+Plaintiff's counsel has further misrepresented to this Court that undersigned counsel for Mr. Bruhnel stated that Mr. Bruhnel, "has been out of this country since prior to the New Year with no plans to return." In fact, undersigned counsel has consistently told Plaintiff's counsel that she was unaware of Mr. Bruhnel's travel schedule and that she did not know when Mr. Bruhnel planned to return to this country.
+
+WHEREFORE, JEAN LUC BRUHNEL, a non-party to the instant matter, and undersigned counsel for Mr. Bruhnel, respectfully request that the Court DENY plaintiff's Motion for an Order to Show Cause and an Order to Compel in its entirety. Mr. Bruhnel and undersigned counsel further respectfully request that the Court impose sanctions and attorney's fees incurred in the defense of Plaintiff's frivolous motion, and for whatever further relief this Court deems appropriate.
+
+Dated: March 12, 2010
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+TAMA BETH KUDM AN, P.A. Attorney for Non-Party Witness, Jean Luc Bruhnel 777 South Flagler Drive Suite 800 - West Tower
+
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561) 515-6032 Fax: (561) 828-0210 E-mail: Tama@tkudmanlaw.com
+
+By: s/ Tama Beth Kudman TAMA BETH KUDMAN Fla Bar No.: 0637432
+
+## CERTIFICATE OF S ERVICE
+
+I hereby certify that on March 12, 2010, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all parties identified via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF.
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740245/EFTA02740245.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740245/EFTA02740245.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ad4f79f705399ce99e2f01af563fef9f539108bb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740245/EFTA02740245.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,341 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740245.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 6,
+  "chars": 7987,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 0.96,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            203.18400000000003,
+            74.52
+          ],
+          [
+            407.4718322753906,
+            74.52
+          ],
+          [
+            407.4718322753906,
+            104.2330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            203.18400000000003,
+            104.2330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "NON-PARTY, JEAN LUC BRUHNEL'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF \nJANE DOE'S MOTION FOR AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND FOR \nAIQII COMPEL AND 1N( PORATM MEMORANDUM F LAW",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            97.92,
+            377.46000000000004
+          ],
+          [
+            514.5869140625,
+            377.46000000000004
+          ],
+          [
+            514.5869140625,
+            424.10302734375
+          ],
+          [
+            97.92,
+            424.10302734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "MEMORANDUM OF LAW",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            233.17200000000003,
+            392.04
+          ],
+          [
+            380.7169189453125,
+            392.04
+          ],
+          [
+            380.7169189453125,
+            407.9830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            233.17200000000003,
+            407.9830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF S ERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            227.052,
+            246.24
+          ],
+          [
+            387.23388671875,
+            246.24
+          ],
+          [
+            387.23388671875,
+            262.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            227.052,
+            262.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            48
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            22
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            45
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            22
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            49
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            23
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            30
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            15
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02740245"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740251/EFTA02740251.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740251/EFTA02740251.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..96cd91b54680beec6a29782750b8b0d1e85b0729
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740251/EFTA02740251.md
@@ -0,0 +1,126 @@
+### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRAMIMI
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
+
+Plaintiff, Jane Doe No.3 ("Jane" or "Jane Doe"), brings this Complaint against Jeffrey Epstein, as follows:
+
+#### Parties, Jurisdiction and Venue
+
+- 1. Jane Doe is a citizen and resident of the State of Florida, and is sui juris.
+- 2. This Complaint is brought under a fictitious name to protect the identity of the Plaintiff because this Complaint makes sensitive allegations of sexual assault and abuse upon her when she was a minor.
+  - 3. Defendant Jeffrey Epstein is a citizen and resident of the State of New York.
+  - 4. This is an action for damages in excess of \$50 million.
+- 5. This Court has jurisdiction of this action and the claims set forth herein pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1332(a), as the matter in controversy (i) exceeds \$75,000, exclusive of interest and costs; and (ii) is between citizens of different states.
+- 6. This Court has venue of this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1391(a) as a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred in this District.
+
+EXHIBIT F
+
+### Factual Alleeations
+
+7. At all relevant times, Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") was an adult male, <sup>52</sup> years old. Epstein is a financier and money manager with asecret clientele limited exclusively to billionaires. He is himself <sup>a</sup>man of tremendous wealth, power and influence. He maintains his principal home in New York and also owns residences in New Mexico, Stilt, and Palm Beach, FL. The allegations herein concern Epstein's conduct while at his lavish estate in Palm Beach.
+
+8. Upon information and belief, Epstein has asexual preference and obsession for underage minor girls. He engaged in <sup>a</sup>plan and scheme in which he gained access to primarily economically disadvantaged minor girls in his home, sexually assaulted these girls, and then gave them money. In or about 2004-2005, Jane Doe, then 16 years old, fell into Epstein's trap and became one of his victims.
+
+9. Upon information and belief, Jeffrey Epstein carried out his scheme and assaulted <sup>g</sup>irls in Florida, New York and on his private island, known as Little St. James, in
+
+10. An integral player in Epstein's Florida scheme wasIIIIMI, a Palm Beach Community College student from Loxahatchee, Florida. She recruited girls ostensibly to give <sup>a</sup> wealthy man <sup>a</sup>massage for monetary compensation in his Palm Beach mansion. Under Epstein's <sup>p</sup>lan, would be contacted when Epstein was planning to be at his Palm Beach residence or soon after he had arrived there. Epstein or someone on his behalf directed- to bring one or more underage girls to the residence. MEI, upon information and belief, generally sought out economically disadvantaged underage girls from Loxahatchee and surrounding areas who would be enticed by the money being offered - generally \$200 to \$300 per "massage" session - and who were perceived as less likely to complain to authorities or have credibility if allegations of improper conduct were made. This was an important element of Epstein's plan.
+
+11. Epstein's plan and scheme reflected aparticular pattern and method. Upon arrival at Epstein's mansion, the victim would be brought to the kitchen. She would then be led up a flight of stairs to a bedroom that contained <sup>a</sup>massage table in addition to other furnishings. Once the girl was alone in this room, Epstein would enter wearing only a towel to cover his private area. He then would lay down on the massage table and perform one or more lewd, lascivious and sexual acts, including masturbation and touching the girl sexually.
+
+12. Consistent with the foregoing plan and scheme, recruited Jane Doe to <sup>g</sup>ive Epstein <sup>a</sup>massage for monetary compensation. brought Jane to Epstein's mansion in Palm Beach. Jane was led up the flight of stairs to the room with the massage table. She was alone in the room when Epstein arrived wearing a towel to cover his private parts. He laid down on the massage table, and sexually assaulted Jane Doe during the massage. In addition, Jeffrey Epstein masturbated during the massage.
+
+13. After Epstein had completed the assault, he left the room. Jane was then able to leave the room and go back down the stairs. She then met again who brought Jane home. Jane was paid \$200 by Epstein. was also paid by Epstein for bringing Jane to him.
+
+14. As a result of this encounter with Epstein, the 16-year old Jane experienced trauma, shock, confusion, shame, humiliation and embarrassment.
+
+# COUNT I Sexual Assault and Battery
+
+15. Plaintiff Jane Doe repeats and realleges paragraphs I through 14 above.
+
+16. Epstein acted with intent to cause an offensive contact with Jane Doe, or an imminent apprehension of such a contact, and Jane Doe was thereby put in such imminent apprehension.
+
+17. Epstein made an intentional, unlawful offer of offensive sexual contact toward Jane
+
+Doe, creating a reasonable fear of imminent peril.
+
+18. Epstein intentionally inflicted harmful or offensive contact on the person of lane Doe, with the intent to cause such contact or the apprehension that such contact is imminent.
+
+19. Epstein tortiously committed asexual assault and battery on Jane Doe. Epstein's acts were intentional, unlawful, offensive and harmful.
+
+20. Epstein's plan and scheme in which he committed such acts upon Jane Doe were done willfully and maliciously.
+
+21. As a direct and proximate result of Epstein's assault on Jane, she has suffered and will continue to suffer severe and permanent traumatic injuries, including mental, psychological and emotional damages.
+
+WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 3 demands judgment against Defendant Jeffrey Epstein for compensatory damages, punitive damages, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper.
+
+## COUNT II Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress
+
+22. Plaintiff Jane Doe repeats and realleges paragraphs 1 through 14 above.
+
+23. Epstein's conduct was intentional or reckless.
+
+24. Epstein's conduct with aminor was extreme and outrageous, going beyond all bounds of decency.
+
+25. Epstein committed willful acts of child sexual abuse on Jane Doe. These acts resulted in mental or sexual injury to Jane Doe, that caused or were likely to cause Jane Doe's mental or emotional health to be significantly impaired.
+
+26. Epstein's conduct caused severe emotional distress to Jane Doe. Epstein knew or had
+
+reason to know that his intentional and outrageous conduct would cause emotional distress and damage to Jane Doe, or Epstein acted with reckless disregard of the high probability of causing severe emotional distress to Jane Doe.
+
+27. As a direct and proximate result of Epstein's intentional or reckless conduct, Jane Doe, has suffered and will continue to suffer severe mental anguish and pain.
+
+WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 3 demands judgment against Defendant Jeffrey Epstein for compensatory damages, costs, punitive damages, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper.
+
+# COUNT HI Coercion and Enticement to Sexual Activity in Violation of 18 U.S.C. <sup>42422</sup>
+
+28. Plaintiff Jane Doe repeats and realleges paragraphs 1 through 14 above.
+
+29. Epstein used afacility or means of interstate commerce to knowingly persuade, induce or entice Jane Doe, when she was under the age of 18 years, to engage in prostitution or sexual activity for which any person can be charged with acriminal offense.
+
+30. On June 30, 2008, Epstein entered <sup>a</sup>plea of guilty to violations of Florida §§ 796.07 and 796.03, in the 15th Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County (Case nos. 2008-cf-<sup>00938</sup>1 AXXXMB and 2006-cf-009454A3003,0), for conduct involving the same plan and scheme as alleged herein.
+
+31. As to PlaintiffJane Doe, Epstein could have been charged with criminal violations of Florida Statute §796.07(2) (including subsections (c), (d), (e), (f), (g), and (h) thereof), and other criminal offenses including violations of Florida Statutes §§ 798.02 and 800.04 (including subsections (5), (6) and (7) thereof).
+
+32. Epstein's acts and conduct are in violation of 18 U.S.C. §2422.
+
+33. As a result of Epstein's violation of 18 U.S.C. §2422, Plaintiff has suffered personal injury, including mental, psychological and emotional damages.
+
+34. Plaintiff hired Herman & Mermelstein, P.A., in this matter and agreed to pay them <sup>a</sup> reasonable attorneys' fee.
+
+WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 3 demands judgment against Defendant Jeffrey Epstein for all damages available under 18 U.S.C. §2255(a), including without limitation, actual and compensatory damages, costs of suit, and attorneys' fees, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper.
+
+#### JURY TRIAL DEMAND
+
+Plaintiff demands a jury trial in this action on all claims so triable.
+
+Dated: February 27, 2009
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+By: s/ Adam D. Horowitz Stuart S. Mermelstein (FL Bar No. 947245) ssm@sexabuseattomev.com Adam D. Horowitz (FL Bar No. 376980) ahorowitz@sexabuseattornev.com MERMELSTEIN & HOROWITZ, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiff 18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160 Tel: 305-931-2200 Fax: 305-931-0877
+
+# CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
+
+I hereby certify that on February 27, 2009,1 electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day to all parties on the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those parties who are not authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing.
+
+/s/ Adam D. Horowitz
+
+## SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. jgoldberger©agwpa.com
+
+Robert D. Critton, Esq. reritton@bc1claw,com
+
+/s/ Adam D. Horowitz
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740251/EFTA02740251.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740251/EFTA02740251.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..dbd63c9f4cbb93b656cad3f8584254bbf4a05b94
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740251/EFTA02740251.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,567 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740251.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 8,
+  "chars": 10105,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.51,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            205.36000061035156,
+            99.0302734375
+          ],
+          [
+            391.68,
+            99.0302734375
+          ],
+          [
+            391.68,
+            126.3070068359375
+          ],
+          [
+            205.36000061035156,
+            126.3070068359375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            296.46
+          ],
+          [
+            391.068,
+            296.46
+          ],
+          [
+            391.068,
+            310.7135314941406
+          ],
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            310.7135314941406
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Parties, Jurisdiction and Venue",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            220.32,
+            375.84000000000003
+          ],
+          [
+            376.992,
+            375.84000000000003
+          ],
+          [
+            376.992,
+            389.4635314941406
+          ],
+          [
+            220.32,
+            389.4635314941406
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Factual Alleeations",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            253.98,
+            99.63
+          ],
+          [
+            351.28799999999995,
+            99.63
+          ],
+          [
+            351.28799999999995,
+            113.4
+          ],
+          [
+            253.98,
+            113.4
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "COUNT I \nSexual Assault and Battery",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            232.56,
+            547.5600000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            368.982421875,
+            547.5600000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            368.982421875,
+            577.2505035400391
+          ],
+          [
+            232.56,
+            577.2505035400391
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "COUNT II \nIntentional Infliction of Emotional Distress",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            197.06400000000002,
+            439.83000000000004
+          ],
+          [
+            409.1461181640625,
+            439.83000000000004
+          ],
+          [
+            409.1461181640625,
+            468.18
+          ],
+          [
+            197.06400000000002,
+            468.18
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "COUNT HI \nCoercion and Enticement to Sexual Activity in Violation of 18 U.S.C. 42422",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            115.05599999999998,
+            310.23
+          ],
+          [
+            482.24676513671875,
+            310.23
+          ],
+          [
+            482.24676513671875,
+            339.39
+          ],
+          [
+            115.05599999999998,
+            339.39
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "JURY TRIAL DEMAND",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            239.29200000000003,
+            311.04
+          ],
+          [
+            367.6131896972656,
+            311.04
+          ],
+          [
+            367.6131896972656,
+            324.25927734375
+          ],
+          [
+            239.29200000000003,
+            324.25927734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            227.052,
+            98.6602783203125
+          ],
+          [
+            374.544,
+            98.6602783203125
+          ],
+          [
+            374.544,
+            113.4
+          ],
+          [
+            227.052,
+            113.4
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "SERVICE LIST \nDOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN \nUnited States District Court, Southern District of Florida",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            162.86000061035156,
+            98.82
+          ],
+          [
+            441.8639999999999,
+            98.82
+          ],
+          [
+            441.8639999999999,
+            141.2235107421875
+          ],
+          [
+            162.86000061035156,
+            141.2235107421875
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            58
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            394
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            376
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            296
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            11
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            335
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            208
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            21
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            11
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            24
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02740251"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740259/EFTA02740259.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740259/EFTA02740259.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f1b0363d0afe60c20e0e40a560c5555738dbf718
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740259/EFTA02740259.md
@@ -0,0 +1,497 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 2,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+-vs-
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+VOLUME I OF II
+
+## Related cases:
+
+08-80232, 08-08380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80993, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092
+
+## VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3
+
+Friday, February 19, 2010 10:07 - 5:09 p.m.
+
+250 Australian Avenue Suite 1500 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
+
+Reported By: Cynthia , RPR, FPR Nofary Public, State of Florida Prose Court Reporting Services Job No.: 1298
+
+EXHIBIT
+
+any additional sworn testimony regarding Mr. Epstein to anyone?
+
+A. No.
+
+Q. Did you ever give ahandwritten report to anyone as to what occurred at Mr. Epstein's house, and I'm not interested again in what happened, once you hired Mr. Herman?
+
+A. I don't remember.
+
+Q. At any time — well, let me ask it this way: After you filed your — or after the Palm Beach Police Department met with you, Officer Recarey met with you, did you ever discuss that meeting, that is the conversation you had with them with Ms. J.S., that is this is what they asked me; what did they ask you?
+
+A. What?
+
+Q. You said J.S. was around you at the time —
+
+A. Yes.
+
+Q. — when the Palm Beach Police Department came, correct?
+
+A. Yes.
+
+Q. Okay. After — did they interview her as well the same day?
+
+A. No.
+
+Q. Okay. Do you know whether she ever went to Epstein's?
+
+A. Yes.
+
+Q. Okay. And how, how did you know that?
+
+A. She told me.
+
+Q. Okay. Did she tell you before the police department ever contacted you?
+
+A. Yes.
+
+Q. Okay. And did you know J.S. was she one of your good friends at the time?
+
+A. Yes.
+
+Q. Okay. She's still a good friend?
+
+A. Yes.
+
+Q. Okay. Do you know whether she's <sup>a</sup> plaintiff or has ever filed any type of claim?
+
+A. I don't know.
+
+Q. Okay. Did you ever tell her that you had filed aclaim?
+
+A. No.
+
+Q. She just knows that you went to Epstein's home?
+
+A. Yes.
+
+Q. Okay. Did she ever tell you what happened at Epstein's home?
+
+A. Yes.
+
+Q. Okay. Did you, did you, did she tell you that before you ever went to Epstein's home?
+
+A. Yes.
+
+Q. Okay. And what was the occasion of her telling -- her, J.S., telling you what had occurred at Epstein — or that she had been to Epstein's home? Do you want me to ask that again
+
+A. Yes.
+
+Q. — because I confused myself.
+
+You said that J.S. told you, before you first went to Mr. Epstein's house which you described as being approximately in June of '04, that she had been to Epstein's home; is that correct?
+
+A. Yes.
+
+Q. Okay. And, and what was the occasion of her telling you, that is how did it come about that she told you she had been to Epstein's home?
+
+A. How did she tell me?
+
+Q. No. What was the occasion? Where were you and how did you — how did the subject come up?
+
+A. Haley asked me if I wanted to do it.
+
+IGa <sup>m</sup> And Haley meaning
+
+Q. And where were you-all at the time?
+
+A. At <sup>a</sup>girlfriend's house.
+
+Q. Whose house were you at?
+
+A. Jane Doe No. 4's.
+
+Q. Jane Doe No. 4 who?
+
+A Doe No. 4.
+
+Q. And how did you know Jane Doe No. 4?
+
+A. I grew up with her in LaMancha. I went to school with her.
+
+Q. Same grade?
+
+A. No.
+
+Q. Older, younger?
+
+A. Older.
+
+Q. How much older?
+
+A A year. MR. MERMELSTEIN: Just to be clear, your question as to who was older, her or Jane Doe No. 4?
+
+BY MR. CRITTON:
+
+Q. I'm assuming you meant Jane Doe No. 4 was ayear older than you.
+
+A. Yes, sir.
+
+MR. CRITTON: I think it was just you.
+
+MR. MERMELSTEIN: Pm the only one that was confused, right?
+
+MR. CRITTON: Yeah.
+
+BY MR. CRITFON: Q. And Jane Doe No. 4, is she from pretty much amiddle class family as well? A. Yes. Q. All right. And Jane Doe No.4 is the one, she's asoccer player, wasn't she? A. Yes. Q. And did you and Jane Doe No. 4 -- well, let me strike that. Let's see, if you went in approximately June of '04, approximately when did this conversation take place, how many months before you ultimately went? A. What conversation? Q. Well, you said that Haley asked you, if <sup>I</sup> understood you, Haley asked you if you wanted to go? A. Yes. Q. Okay. Is that the first time Haley had ever brought it up to you? A. No. Q. So, at least at the time that Haley brought up going to Mr. Epstein's house or going to -- did you know his name was Epstein at that time? A. Jeffrey.
+
+Q. Just Jeffrey. All right. When she said, she asked you, apparently again, if you were interested in going to Mr. — to, to Jeffrey's house to give him a massage, at least on this occasion Jane Doe No. 4 — you were at Jane Doe No. 4's house, and J.S. was there — A. No. <sup>B</sup>Q. - as well as Haley? Is that wrong? A. That is wrong. Q. Okay. Then let me ask a question. <sup>I</sup> thought you -- had you learned that J.S., had, J.S. had been at Jeffrey's house sometime before this conversation? A. Yes. Q. By "this conversation," I mean when Haley asked you, you were at Jane Doe No. 4's house. A. Yes. Q. How much earlier was the conversation where J.S. told you she had been to Jeffrey's house? A. A lot earlier. Q. A number of months? A. Probably, yeah. Q. And when J.S. told you that, what did she tell you; that is what were the circumstances of her tell ou? Who was there? Where were you?
+
+ A. Don't know exactly where I was. I don't remember. She told me that she gave <sup>a</sup>massage to Jeffrey for \$200. Q. Did she tell you how many times she'd done it? A. No. A. No. Q. Did you say, what are you doing giving did she tell you how old Jeffrey was? A. No. Q. Okay. Had you ever heard — or let me strike that. At the time that J.S. mentioned that, first mentioned to you that she had given a guy named Jeffrey a massage for \$200, had you, had Haley ever talked to you at all? A. Yes. Q. And Haley had talked to you <sup>a</sup>number of months before you eventually went to Mr. Epstein's home; is that correct? A. Yes. . Or to Jeffrey's home. Where were you when first said something to you about Jeffrey? Did you ask her about Jeffrey?
+
+A. Jane Doe No. 4's house. Q. Okay. And who was there at the time, you, Jane Doe No.4, Haley; anyone else? A. Nope. Q. And how many months was this prior to your ultimately going to Jeffrey's home? A. I don't remember. Q. Four months, six months? A. I don't remember. Q. A number of momhs? A. I really don't remember. Q. You don't know whether it was <sup>a</sup>day or <sup>a</sup> number of months? MR. MERMELSTEIN: Objection. She's answered the question. THE WITNESS: I don't remember. I, I don't remember. BY MR. CRITTON: Q. I just want you to make sure, because <sup>I</sup> want to make sure that the ladies and gentlemen understand. So, the first conversation where Haley ever referenced going to Jeffreys house, you were at Jane Doe No. 4 home, you, Haley and Jane Doe No.4 were the only people there, correct?
+
+1 A. Correct. 2 Q. And then we know you went to Mr. Epstein's 3 home, or at least by your testimony, sometime in 4 June of '04; is that correct? 5 A. Yes. 6 Q. So, and is it your testimony as to when 7 this conversation first took place, where Haley 8 asked you if you wanted to go to Jeffrey's home, you 9 don't recall whether that was a week before you 10 ultimately went or months; is that correct? 11 A. Correct. 12 Q. What did Haley say to you the first 13 occasion at Jane Doe No. 4's home? 14 A. Excuse me. You can make quick money, 200 15 bucks just to give a guy a massage. 16 Q. And did she tell you about who the guy 17 was? 18 A. Yeah, his name is Jeffrey Epstein. 19 Q. And she said Epstein? 20 A. Yes. 21 Q. Okay. And did she tell you where he 22 lived? 23 A. On Palm Beach. 24 Q. I assume you'd been to Palm Beach before. 25 A. Yes.
+
+- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
+- Q. And did she tell you anything about it, that is, his age, what he did?
+  - A. No.
+- Q. Did she tell you anything about how old he was, that is, whether he was your age, whether he was an older person?
+  - A. No.
+  - Q. Did you ask?
+  - A. I don't remember.
+- Q. Did, did you say, wait a minute, why would -- well, let me strike that Did she, Haley, say that she had been there?
+  - A. Yes.
+- Q. Did she say that she'd given him a massage before?
+  - A. No.
+- Q. Okay. Did you say, why are you asking me if I would be interested in going?
+  - A. I don't remember.
+- Q. Okay. Had you ever given a person a massage before, before that period of time?
+  - A. Yes.
+  - Q. Okay. To whom had you given a massage?
+  - A. M mom, m cousin.
+
+1 Q. Ever done it with a, with a guy? 2 A. No. 3 Q. A boyfriend? 4 A. No. 5 Q. Did Jane Doe No. 4 say anything at that 6 time when Haley asked you? 7 A. Excuse me. I don't remember. 8 Q. Did you know that Jane Doe No. 4 had 9 gone — 10 A. No. 11 Q. — to Epstein's home at that time? 12 A. No. 13 Q. Okay. At some point she told you, didn't 14 she? 15 A. She didn't tell me, no. 16 Q. At some point did you come to learn that 17 Jane Doe No. 4 had been to Mr. Epstein's home? 18 A. Yes. 19 Q. Okay. From whom did you learn that fact? 20 A. Word of mouth. 21 Q. When you say, "word of mouth," meaning 22 what, it was just common knowledge? 23 A. We all hung out together. 24 Q. So, at some point somebody mentioned that 25 Jane Doe No. 4 had been to Epstein's house?
+
+1 A. Yes. 2 Q. Did you ever ask Jane Doe No. 4, say, hey, 3 how many times have you been to Epstein's house? 4 A. No. 5 Q. Okay. Did -- when the word of mouth that 6 Jane Doe No. 4 had been to Mr. Epstein's hoist, was 7 that kind of discussed when you guys would get 8 together, that is, who had been to Epstein's house? 9 A. Can you repeat that, please? 10 Q. Sure. You said you learned that Jane Doe 11 No. 4 had gone to Mr. Epstein's house by word of 12 mouth because you were all friends. 13 A. Yes 14 Q. Okay. And somebody brought it up, but you 15 can't identify who the person is that brought it up. 16 A. Yes. 17 Q. Okay. And did you learn from at least 18 these conversations, before you ever went to 19 Mr. Epstein's house, that Jane Doe No. 4 had been 20 there on many occasions? 21 A. No, I did not know that. 22 Q. Okay. Did you — you knew for sure she'd 23 been there once, but you didn't know how many times 24 she'd been there? 25 A. Correct.
+
+Page 102 Q. All right. And how much longer did you, the two of you continue to date? A. Maybe about two years, <sup>a</sup>year and ahall Q. Two years after that? 5 A. Yes. Q. So you dated Clint about a year, <sup>a</sup>year to a year and ahalf before you had this conversation about giving a massage to Mr. Epstein, and then you dated another two years after that? A. About a year after that. Q. Okay. A. Yeah. Q. All right. So how much time transpired or passed before you then had aconversation with — another conversation about the possibility of giving a massage to Jeffrey? A. I have no idea. Q. Was it a month, a week, a year, two years? A. A while. Q. Was it after then? A. I was already broken up with Clint. Q. All right. So it had to have been about <sup>a</sup> year later. A year — A. Me and him were on and off. We didn't have <sup>a</sup> steady relationship.
+
+1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Page 103 Q. So now you're no longer dating Clint, or you're on and off with Clint at this point in time? A. Yes. Q. And what happens? How does the topic come up again? A. I was approached again by Haley. Q. Where were you at the time? A. I don't it:member. Q. Do you remember who was there? A. I don't remember. Q. How often -- were you and Haley goo<sup>d</sup> friends? A. No. A. Q. A. No. 4. A. Were you friends? Yes. Okay. More acquaintance-type friends? Yes. Okay. Was she good friends with Jane Doe Were she and Jane Doe No. 4 good friends? I don't know their relationship. Okay. Well, at least the first time when -- that you're at Jane Doe No. 4's house when Haley mentioned to you, do you, were you interested in making — giving a massage to Jeffrey, there was only the three of you. So were any of you goo<sup>d</sup>
+
+1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Page 104 friends? A. Excuse me. Yes, me and Jane Doe No.4 were good friends, yes. Q. Are you and Jane Doe No. 4 still goo<sup>d</sup> friends? A. No. Q. Okay. When did you, you and Jane Doe No. 4 stop being good friends? A. When she went auxt2 college. Q. When she went MEM University? A. Yes. Q. Do you know whether Jane Doe No. 4 is <sup>a</sup> <sup>p</sup>laintiff in alawsuit against Mr. Epstein? A. 1 don't know. Q. Okay. Do you know if I — do you know whether your current lawyer is representing Ms. Doe No. 4? A. Yes. Q. Okay. How do you know that? A. Because I've spoken with her. Q. With Jane Doe No. 4? A. (Witness nods head.) Q. Okay. And so — THE COURT REPORTER: Is that a yes? THE WITNESS: Yes. Yes, sorry.
+
+Page 105 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 BY MR. CR1TTON: Q. Okay. And she told you — when did you last speak with Jane Doe No. 4? A. A couple of days ago. Q. All right. A. I need to take a break, please. Q. Can I have two more minutes? A. No, I'm tired. I need to take a break, please. MR. CRITTON: All right. THE VIDEOGRAPHER: We're going off the record at 11:43 am. (A brief recess was held.) THE VIDEOGRAPHER: We're back on the record at 11:57 a.m. BY MR. CRITPON: Q. We were talking about Jane Doe No. 4, and you said that you spoke with her a couple of days ago. A. Yes. Q. How long have you known that Jane Doe No. 4 is a plaintiff against Mr. Epstein? A. A little while. Q. What's alittle while mean to you, <sup>a</sup> month, a week, a year?
+
+A. Correct. Q. And then we know you went to Mr. Epstein's home, or at least by your testimony, sometime in June of '04; is that correct? A. Yes. Q. So, and is it your testimony as to when this conversation first took place, where Haley asked you if you wanted to go to Jeffrey's home, you don't recall whether that was <sup>a</sup>week before you ultimately went or months; is that correct? A. Correct. Q. What did Haley say to you the first occasion at Jane Doe No. 4's home? A. Excuse me. You can make quick money, 200 bucks just to give a guy <sup>a</sup>massage. Q. And did she tell you about who the guy was? A. Yeah, his name is Jeffrey Epstein. Q. And she said Epstein? A. Yes. Q. Okay. And did she tell you where he lived? A. On Palm Beach. Q. I assume you'd been to Palm Beach before. A. Yes.
+
+Page 91 Q. And did she tell you anything about it, that is, his age, what he did? A. No. Q. Did she tell you anything about how old he was, that is, whether he was your age, whether he was an older person? A. No. Q. Did you ask? A. I don't remember. Q. Did, did you say, wait a minute, why would -- well, let me strike that. Did she, Haley, say that she had been there? A. Yes. Q. Did she say that she'd given him a massage before? A. No. Q. Okay. Did you say, why are you asking me if I would be interested in going? A. I don't remember. Q. Okay. Had you ever given a person <sup>a</sup> massage before, before that period of time? A. Yes. Q. Okay. To whom had you given a massage? A. M mom, <sup>m</sup>cousin.
+
+Q. Ever done it with a, with a guy? A. No. Q. A boyfriend? A. No. Q. Did Jane Doe No. 4 say anything at that time when Haley asked you? A. Excuse me. I don't remember. Q. Did you know that Jane Doe No. 4 had gone -- A. No. Q. — to Epstein's home at that time? A. No. Q. Okay. At some point she told you, didn't she? A. She didn't tell me, no. Q. At some point did you come to learn that Jane Doe No. 4 had been to Mr. Epstein's home? A. Yes. Q. Okay. From whom did you learn that fact? A. Word of mouth. Q. When you say, "word of mouth," meaning what, it was just common knowledge? A. We all hung out together. Q. So, at some point somebody mentioned that Jane Doe No. 4 had been to Epstein's house? \_
+
+Page 93 A. Yes. Q. Did you ever ask Jane Doe No. 4, say, hey, how many times have you been to Epstein's house? A. No. Q. Okay. Did — when the word of mouth that Jane Doe No. 4 had been to Mr. Epstein's house, was that kind of discussed when you guys would ge<sup>t</sup> together, that is, who had been to Epstein's house? A. Can you repeat that, please? Q. Sure. You said you leaned that Jane Doe No.4 had gone to Mr. Epstein's house by word of mouth because you were all friends. A. Yes. Q. Okay. And somebody brought it up, but you can't identify who the person is that brought it up. A. Yes. Q. Okay. And did you learn from at least these conversations, before you ever went to Mr. Epstein's house, that Jane Doe No.4 had been there on many orrasions? A. No, I did not 'mow that. Q. Okay. Did you -- you knew for sure she'd been there once, but you didn't know how many times she'd been there? A. Correct
+
+Q. Okay. Did, did you at some point get the drift — not the drift — did you, did you come to at least understand, based on the conversations that were going on before you ever went to Mr. Epstein's, that she had been there anumber of times?
+
+A. No. Q. Just that she had been there? A. Correct. Q. All right. But you understood that she had also gone to Epstein's to give him a massage?
+
+A. Correct. Q. Who else did you learn, other than Haley and Jane Doe No. 4, at least on the first occasion, did you learn or know that had given Mr. Epstein <sup>a</sup> massage, or purportedly had given him a massage?
+
+A. I didn't know Haley given, has given Epstein <sup>a</sup> massage.
+
+Q. You just ;mew that she asked you if you would be interested?
+
+A. Yes. Q. Okay. And did you ask her at that time, say, did you give him — have you ever given him <sup>a</sup> massage?
+
+A. No. Q. Okay. At the time she asked — first
+
+asked you, when you were at Jane Doe No. 4's house, what was your response?
+
+A. I don't know; I'll have to think about it. Q. Okay. What questions did you ask before you even said, I don't know; I'll have to think about it?
+
+A. What happens? Q. Did you— and what did she say?
+
+A. You give him a massage. Q. Okay. And what did you say, well, I have never really given -- I have never given aman <sup>a</sup> massage, did you tell her that?
+
+A. No. Q. And have you ever given a boyfriend <sup>a</sup> massage, did I ask you that?
+
+A. You did ask me that. Q. Okay. You were, you were — had, already at that point in your time, 2004, had had relationships with other males, true?
+
+A. Yes. Q. Okay. And you were sexually active at that point in time, true?
+
+A. Yes. Q. All right. And you had never given amale amasses?
+
+A. Not that I remember, no.
+
+Q. Okay. Well, did you say, did you say to Haley, as well, what do I have to do for \$200?
+
+A. Yes.
+
+Q. Okay. And what did she say?
+
+A. A massage.
+
+Q. Okay. Did you say, what's the massage consist of?
+
+A. I did not say that.
+
+Q. Okay. Did you say, how long does it have to last?
+
+A. Yes.
+
+Q. And what did she say?
+
+A. Half an hour.
+
+Q. All right. And did she tell you where you'd have to go?
+
+A. Yes.
+
+Q. Did you say, well, who's going to go there with me?
+
+A. Yes.
+
+Q. All right. And she said?
+
+A. She would.
+
+Q. All right. And did she say -- did you discuss how you were to get there?
+
+A. She already said she would drive.
+
+Q. Okay. And what, what in, at least in your thinking process at that time would cause you even to think that you might have some interest in doing that, that is, going to give some unknown person, unknown to you, at their home ahalf-hour massage for 200 bucks?
+
+MR. MERMELSTEIN: Objection to form.
+
+THE WITNESS: Can you repeat that?
+
+MR. CRITTON: No, but Cindy can. Cindy will. She can and will.
+
+THE WITNESS: Okay.
+
+(The requested portion of the record was read by the reporter.)
+
+THE WITNESS: So you want to know my interest?
+
+BY MR. CRITTON:
+
+Q. Yeah, why, why — why you, who is apparently about 16 at the time would have any interest in giving a massage to some unknown male that you had never met, ahalf-hour massage which you didn't know what it consisted of, for 200 bucks?
+
+A. I was young and it was \$200.
+
+Q. And if I understood your earlier
+
+testimony, you didn't say, well, Haley, have you done it?
+
+1 anything improper or otherwise. 2 Is there -- what, if anything, has caused 3 you now that we have finished about an hour or 4 45-minute lunch break that maybe June of '04 was not 5 the right date, approximately, that you went to 6 Mr. Epstein's home for the first time? 7 A. Okay. 8 me VIDEOGRAPHER: You're fine. 9 THE WITNESS: Okay. Just thinking about 10 it, like, I don't want, I don't want to make 11 exact dates and may be wrong. 12 BY MR. CRITTON: 13 Q. Could it have been '05? 14 A. It could have been, yes. 15 Q. Would it have been before your birthday in 16 '05 for the first time, or could it have been 17 afterwards? 18 A. After, I think. 19 Q. Okay. 20 A. I don't know. 21 Q. So all you know is that you went to 22 Mr. Epstein's home four times. It could have 23 started in '05. It could have started in '04. You 24 just can't tell us as you sit here today? 25 A. Right, I can't tell you exact dales.
+
+1 Q. Okay. And you can't tell us -- I mean, 2 there's nothing about -- well, there, there was. 3 You said that one of the visits you had you 4 remembered seeing a -- some sort of Christmas 5 decoration. 6 A. Correct. 7 Q. Okay. And instead of being in 8 December-ish of'04, assuming that's when Christmas 9 decorations come out, it could have been as well 10 December of '05. Is that possible? 11 A. I don't know. 12 Q. Well, I'm asking you, is that possible, it 13 could have been December of '05 as distinct from 14 December of'04, or you just don't know one way or 15 the other? 16 A. I just know that it was around Christmas one 17 of the times. 18 Q. But you can't tell me whether it was '04 19 or '05? 20 A. Correct. 21 Q. Because you don't remember when the first 22 time was? 23 A. Correct. 24 Q. And that could have been sometime in — 25 after your 16th birthday. Could have even been
+
+1 after your 17th birthday. You just don't remember? 2 A. I first visited Jeffrey, like I stated before, 3 soon after I turned 16. 4 Q. Okay. But we established just by simple 5 math - 6 A. I'm not a math genius. 7 Q. None of us are, that's why we can use — 8 if I add 16 to 88, Ixoca Ise you were born in 1988, 9 that takes me to 2004, March of 2004. All right. 10 I'm not hying to be tricky here. I'm trying to — 11 would you agree with me, 16 and 88 is — 12 A. Sixteen, yes. 13 Q. All right So if it was sometime after 14 that, then it had to have been in '04, or do you 15 want to say it still could have been '05? 16 A. I still say it was after I was 16. 17 Q. Okay. And it still could, could have been 18 in '04; it could have been in '05. You're just not 19 sure? 20 A. Correct. 21 Q. All right Okay. So let's just stick with 22 the first time, then. So they —1 'mow you, you 23 told us that Haley asked if you wanted to go. You 24 were with Jane Doe No. 4 only. You were at Jane Doe 25 No. 4's house, just the three of you. You said
+
+1 you'd think about it. You went back. You talked 2 about it with Clint Brewster who was your boyfriend 3 at that time. He basically said, he discouraged 4 you, as you described earlier, correct? 5 A. Yes. 6 Q. Then. Then sometime later there, now you 7 and Clint were either between, either weren't dating 8 anymore or you were — I think you said you weren't 9 dating anymore, so somebody — was that Haley again 10 asked you then again? 11 A. Yes. 12 Q. Okay. And where were you at the time 13 Haley asked you? 14 A. I don't remember. 15 Q. All right. And when she asked you, do you 16 itmeinber whether anyone else was thereat the time? 17 A. I don't remember. 18 Q. And did— what did she say to you? 19 A. Do you want to make \$200 and give a guy a 20 massage, or Jeffrey a massage. 21 Q. And you said — did you say something 22 like, we talked about this before, I said, no? 23 A. No. 24 Q. Okay. What did you say this time? 25 A. I'll call you back. I'll get back to you,
+
+something along that line. Q. And what happened then? A. I agreed to do so and she set it up. Q. Did you, did you call her or did she call you or did you just see her again? A. She initiated it. Q. Okay. What, she called you or did she see you? A. She called me. Q. Okay. And is, and as far as you, you were concerned is that at least you were going to go there, give this Jeffrey chap a massage, and that was the extent of the conversation? A. At first, yes. Q. When you say "at first," you mean at least, at least from the first time she told you — A. Yes. Q. — the second time? A. Yes. Q. Okay. And even when she spoke to you on the phone, she basically said — or let me say it, the first time she asked you if you want, you were, when you were at Jane Doe No. 4's house, if you wanted to go give this — give Jeffrey a massage for 200 bucks, that was the extent of the conversation,
+
+Page 219 correct? 2 A. Yes. Q. Okay. The second time that she mentioned it, again, it was pretty similar as it was give this Jeffrey chap a massage, 200 bucks? A. Yes. Q. If you want to do it. And you said, I'll think about it? A. Yes. Q. You called her back and said, I'll do it? A. Yes. Q. Okay. And then she said, okay, n1 let you know? A. She'll set it up. Q. All right. And so at least at that time, when you talked to her on the phone and she then called you back and set it up, as far as you were concerned at that time you were going to give <sup>a</sup> half-hour massage for 200 bucks? A. Yes. Q. And that was the extent of the conversation or, at least, the two conversations and the two phone calls that you two had had? A. At that — what do you mean? 9. That was the extent of the conversations
+
+that you had had. She had set it up and she said, okay, we're going to go at such-and-such atime. And that's all she had said to you at least up until the time that she picked you up? A. Correct. Q. Okay. That is the phone conversations, that is the in-person conversations, time one, when you decided no; the second time you said, I'll think about it; the third time is you called her back and said, ifs okay, I'll do it; and the fourth time is, she said — she called you back and said, okay,1 set it up for such-and-such atime and I'll pick you up at such-and-such atime. Is that substantially correct, or correct? A. She asked me the first time. I had spoken with my boyfriend, so no. And then she asked me the second time, I told her I'd to think about it. I agree<sup>d</sup> to it, she set it up. Q. Okay. So second time you did — I thought you said you, you told her you'd think about it. A. I said I would think about it, and then I agreed to it. Q. The same - A. The second time. Q. Right there at the second occasion that
+
+Page 221 she mentioned it to you? 2 A. Right. Q. You didn't call her back? You said -- A. No, I — Q. You thought about it right then and there? A. No, I called her back. Q. Okay. That's what I'm getting at. A. Yes. Q. And you called her back and said this was what, a two, aten-second conversation, and said, okay, I'll do it? A. Then she said she'll -- Q. Yes? First of all, is that yes? A. Yes. Q. It was like asecond ten-second conversation? A. Yes. Q. And then she called you back for another ten-second conversation that said, okay, l have set it up for such-and-such a time, and I'll pick you up? A. Yes. Q. Okay. And that was the extent of the conversation, just basically a scheduling issue? A. Correct
+
+![](_page_8_Picture_12.jpeg)
+
+1 713E WITNESS: Could you restate that? 2 BY MR. CRITTON: 3 Q. Sure. You said before you went to 4 Mr. Epstein's the first time, you learned or heard 5 from that she and Mr. Epstein had gotten into a 6 disagreement, correct? 7 A. Yes. 8 Q. Okay. Did you ask her what the nature of 9 the disagreement was? Because you wouldn't want to 10 go to someplace where you might have a disagreement, 11 right? 12 A. Correct. 13 Q. All right. And what did she say to you 14 when you asked her? 15 A. She said that it was in regards to her, her 16 not getting paid. 17 Q. She didn't get money or — 18 A. Correct. 19 Q. — it was either she didn't get paid or 20 didn't get the right amount? 21 A. She didn't get — that she wasn't going to get 22 paid. 23 Q. Okay. Did she tell you why she wasn't 24 going to get paid? 25 A. Something to do with a question that he had
+
+1 asked her, and she just — 'guess she didn't like it 2 and they got into a little disagreement. 3 Q. Okay. And did you, did you then think to 4 yourself as, gee, you know, I could go over there, 5 give a massage and not get paid because I could get 6 into a disagreement like J.S. did, or did she make 7 it out like it was really no big deal? 8 A. She made it seem like it was not a big major 9 concern. 10 Q. Okay. And Jane Doe No. 4, what did Jane 11 Doe No. 4 — did she ever indicate that you should 12 have any hesitation going over to Mr. Epstein's 13 home? 14 A. No. 15 Q. All right. And Haley, did she ever 16 indicate to you that you should hesitate to go over 17 to Mr. Epstein's home? 18 A. Not really, no. 19 Q. Okay. So you had Jane Doe No. 4, Jane Doe 20 No. 7, J.S. and Haley who all, at least from your 21 perspective, led you to believe that your going to 22 Mr. Epstein's home was not a problem, no big deal, 23 safe, true? 24 A. True. 25 MR. MERMELSTEIN: Objection to form.
+
+1 BY MR. CRITTON: 2 Q. Because if any of those four people, I= Jane Doe No. 4, Jane Doe No. 7 orliPad 4 said anything that would have caused you any 5 concern, would it be a correct statement you, more 6 likely than not, would not have gone? 7 MR. MERMELSTEIN: Objection to form. 8 THE WITNESS: Yeah. 9 BY MR. CRITTON: 10 Q. All right. Because they were friends of 11 yours? 12 A. Yet 13 Q. All right. And if something bad had 14 happened or something inappropriate had happened, at 15 least from their perspective you would have expected 16 them to tell you that, wouldn't you? 17 A. Yes, I did. 18 Q. All right. And none of those four friends 19 of yours told you anything or disclosed anything to 20 you that caused you any concern; is that correct? 21 A. Correct. 22 Q. And if you felt that they had misled you 23 in any way, you would have been angry with them, 24 wouldn't you? 25 A. Yes.
+
+1 Q. After you came back from Mr. Epstein's the 2 first time, did you ever talk with Jane Doe No. 4, 3 that is shortly after you were there the fast time, 4 about what had occurred? 5 A. No. 6 Q. All right. Did you ever suggest to her 7 that she had in any way misled you or lied to you or 8 deceived you 9 A. No. 10 Q. — about her experiences with Mr. Epstein? 11 A. No. 12 Q. Did you ever say anything within a short 13 period — and a short period could be a day, it 14 could be a week, it could be a month, it could be 15 six months. Did you ever talk with J.S. and tell 16 her what had occurred at Mr. Epstein's? 17 A. I don't remember. 18 Q. Okay. Did you ever express anger with her 19 or, or did you ever tell her that she had in some 20 way deceived you or misled you? 21 A. No. 22 Q. Or lied to you? 23 A. No. 24 Q. Okay. Within a short period of time 25 again, you know, a day to six months, did you ever
+
+1 Q. All right You've never spoken with 2 Mr. Epstein or anyone who works on his behalf by 3 phone, have you? 4 A. No. 5 Q. Okay. Mr. Epstein or anyone on his behalf 6 has never texted you, have they? 7 A. No. 8 Q. Okay. Has anyone, has either Mr. Epstein 9 or anyone on his behalf corresponded with you or 10 communicated with you by way of e-mail or over the 11 computer? 12 A. No. 13 Q. Okay. Has Mr. Epstein or anyone on his 14 behalf ever communicated with you by text messages 15 or any other type of, you know, electronic 16 communication? 17 A. No. 18 Q. All right So, all right First time you 19 turned Haley down. Second time you said you'd think 20 about it I think you told me in the interim you 21 had, you'd known — you had known that Jane Doe No. 22 4 had been there. You knew Jane Doe No. 7 had been 23 there. You know J.S. had been there. And you knew 24 that Haley had been there, but you didn't know if 25 she had done anything, ever given a massage; is that
+
+2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Q. Yes, =. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 correct? A. Yes. Q. MI right. But you knew that J.S., Jane Doe No. 7 had been there, and Jane Doe No.4 had been there, and none of them expressed to you, either by outward signs that you saw or anything verbally that would have caused you any concern; is that a fair statement? A. Yes. Q. Okay. Before you got in the car — okay, so at some point you knew that Jeffrey was in lived in Palm Beach. A. Yes. Q. Did you know that before you went? A. That he lived in Palm Beach? A. Yes. Q. All right. And you knew, did you know anything about his age at that time? A. No. Q. Okay. Did you know, did you think he was your age, or did you think he was older, or... A. I don't know. Q. You just — okay. A. I had no idea.
+
+Page 223
+
+1 Q. All right Did you ever -- again, 2 before — did Haley come to pick you up that day, 3 whatever the first day is you went to Mr. Epstein's 4 house? 5 A. She picked me up, yes. 6 Q. Okay. And when she picked you up, was it 7 in her car? 8 A. Yes. 9 Q. Do you remember what kind of car she had? 10 A. It was a truck. 11 Q. Okay. 12 A. A maroon truck. 13 Q. All right. And when she -- before you got 14 in the truck, did you look in and say -- well, let 15 me ask you this: What did you have on? What were 16 you wearing? 17 A. A skirt and a shirt. 18 Q. And under that you had your bra and your 19 boy shorts? 20 A. Yes. 21 Q. All right. And what did the skirt look 22 like? 23 A. Like a jean skirt. 24 Q. Short, long? 25 A. Yeah, fingertip length.
+
+Page 225
+
+1 Q. Okay. And your shirt? 2 A. I don't remember what shirt I was wearing. 3 Q. Like a tank top or a crop top, or was it 4 a -- 5 A. No, it was a, it was a regular shirt. 6 Q. Like a blouse -- 7 A. Yes. 8 Q. — shirt? Before you got in the car, 9 Haley pulls up in her truck. Before you get in the 10 truck did you say, do I look okay? 11 A. No. 12 Q. Okay. Did Haley — did you say is, you 13 know, I've thought about this, tell me a little bit 14 more about what Pm doing for 200 bucks? 15 A. No. 16 Q. Had you ever made 200 bucks for a 17 half-an-hour's work before? 18 A. No. 19 Q. Okay. Had anybody ever paid you \$200 for 20 doing an hour, a half hour or an hour or two-hours 21 worth of work? 22 A. Yes. 23 Q. Doing what? 24 A. Regnataing tables. 25 O. Reeroutintz tables. Explain that for me.
+
+12 (Pages 222 to 225)
+
+Q. All I'm hying to do is, is ifs your best recollection that you remember when you went to Mr. Epstein's house, approximately June of 2004, because you got aused 2006 Toyota Corolla, correct? A. I got a2006 Toyota Corolla for my 16th birthday. Q. Okay. And you got that at Mat, approximately three months after your 16th birthday? A. I got it on my 16th birthday. Q. At — okay. And did you go and get your driver's license on your 16th birthday or did you have alearner's permit? A. I had alearner's permit. Q. So you could drive that car with someone else? A. Yes. Q. And who gave you the car? A. My mother. Q. Okay. And any strings attached to it; that is, did you have to pay the insurance? Did you have to pay for the ear? Did you have to make any payments? A. I paid \$1,000 down payment, and I paid for the car. Q. Okay. And what did your mom pay for it?
+
+She obviously — she got you the car? A. I put the \$1,000 down payment. She took care of the rest. Q.., okay. So you put 1,000 and your mom paid off for the, the remaining balance of the vehicle, of the car? A. Well, she bought it from the bank, so... Q. All right, but she paid it? A. Uh-huh. Q. Yes? A. Yes. Q. All right. So, from your 16th birthday on you were able to drive acar? A. Yes. Q. Okay. Let me go bad( then to the police statement. The police statement that you gave in the Epstein well, let me strike that. You were at Mr. Epstein's home on, you say approximately June of 2004. And I think you went on how many additional occasions to his home? A. I went atotal of four times. Q. And were they within ashort period of time, or were they over <sup>a</sup>length of time? A. A length of time. Q. And what — for going the second time, do
+
+you recall what approximate date that was? Or if you want to use approximately X-time after June of '04, that's okay too. A. I don't remember. Q. How about the third time? A. About close to Christmas. Q. And what makes you recall that, that it -- A. Decorations. Q. — that it was close to Christmas? A. Decorations. Q. Okay. You mean, just decorations around town or decorations — that is, where did you see decorations that makes you remember the third time you were at his home? A. °negate. Q. On his gate? A. On a gate. Q. On just a gate when you were going, headed that way? A. Yes. Q. All right. And then the fourth time was approximately when? Was it after Christmas? 3 A. Yes. Q. Approximately how long after? A. It was hot outside, maybe spring, summer.
+
+Q. And that would have been of '05? A. Correct. Q. So if — of the four times that you went, last being approximately spring/summer of '05 based on your testimony, how much after that period or how long atime period transpired before you spoke with the police, or do you just not have any recollection? A. I don't remember. Q. And you don't remember whether you spoke to the police in '05 or '06 or '07; is that <sup>a</sup> correct statement? A. Correct. Q. And I think part of my question was — is, you indicated 1 think you've seen the police statement approximately two or three times? A. Correct. Q. Okay. Did you read the entire statement? A. Yes. Q. Okay. Did you see — was anything, do you know, if I use the word "redacted," do you know what that means? A. No, sir. Q. Somethings crossed out A. Yes, I saw that.
+
+BY MR. CRITTON: Q. All right. Let me go back to J.L., okay. At the time that Mr. Epstein, at least based on what you testified earlier today, is because Mr. Epstein did touch your breasts -- well, in fact, I should probably clear up one thing. He only touched you in the vaginal area, from what you've testified to today, is over your boy shorts, correct? A. Yes. Q. And you have said that there was never any penetration? A. Correct. Q. Okay. You never touched any of his private parts, true? A. Correct. Q. Okay. You never had any land of intercourse? A. No. Q. All right. Never had oral sex? A. No. Q. He to you, you to him, correct? A. No. Q. Any type of other no type of sexual contact whatsoever? MR. MERMELSTEIN: Objection, form.
+
+THE WITNESS: Yes. BY MR CRITTON: Q. Okay. And what kind of a friend, at least with Jane Doe No. 2, what kind of afriend exposes another good friend to a shocking, disturbing, emotionally disturbing event? MR. MERMELSTEIN: rhetorical. BY MR. CRITTON: Q. Why did you do that? A. I don't know. Q. Okay. You also did that to J., J.L., correct? A. Yes. Q. Okay. Why did you do that with J.L.? A. I don't know. MR. CRTITON: Let's go about ten more minutes, and we'll take abreak. Okay? MR. MERMELSTEIN: All right. Is that okay? THE WITNESS: (Witness nods head.) MR. MERMELSTEIN: Okay. BY MR. CRITTON: Q. Did you tell J.L. what / Did you tell her what vou had told Form, argumentative,
+
+Page 175
+
+BY MR. CRITTON: Q. That is, your, your sexual organ with one of his sexual organs; that never occurred, correct? A. You're asking me if I've had sex with hint? Q. No. None of your sexual organs ever came in contact with his sexual organs, true? A. Correct. <sup>B</sup>Q. All right. So, again, what — based on what you told Haley that he did touch your breasts, and that you did take your shin and your skirt off but left on your bra and your boy shorts, that you were in shock and emotionally disturbed at what happened within at the time, and then you told Haley within an hour how upset you were, you also took Jane Doe No. 2 there, correct? A. Yes. Q. All right. And was Jane Doe No. 2 agoo<sup>d</sup> friend of yours, then? A. Yes. Q. All right. So despite this, I'd say, shocking incident to you, you were willing to expose your friend Jane Doe No. 2 as well to, at least based on your testimony, to this shocking, disturbing experience that you had had, true? MR MERMELSTEIN: Form.
+
+Page 177
+
+A. Not exactly. Q. But did you tell her she might be asked to take off her clothes? A. And that you don't have to, yes. Q. All right. And you said you, you may be asked to take off your clothes, but you don't have to? A. Yes. Q. Okay. And did you say he might try to touch you, but if he does, just tell him you're not comfortable? MR\_ MERMELSIEIN: Form. THE WITNESS: Can you — BY MR. CRITTON: Q. Yeah. Did you, did you tell her as well, is if he tries to touch you, just tell him you don't feel comfortable? MR. MERMELSTEIN: Form. THE WITNESS: I told her if he tries to do anything, you can say no. BY MR. CRITTON: Q. Okay. And, and then he will stop? A. Yes. Q. Okay. And did you tell Jane Doe No. 2 the same thing --
+
+Q. Haley's house? A. Yes. Q. Okay. And, and what did you do there? A. Get ready to go out or do something. I don't remember. Q. Did you go out that night? A. We did. I don't know. Q. Did something? A. I don't remember. We did something. I don't remember. Q. The three of you did something? A. We did something. Q. Okay. Do you remember what you did with the money? A. No. Q. Okay. Did you buy anything, or you just don't remember one way or the other? A. I bought abeer. Q. All right. Usually beers aren't <sup>200</sup> bucks. A. Right. Q. Especially in — all right. And you don't remember what you did with the rest of the money? A. No. Q. The, the next time you went, I think you
+
+Page 259
+
+said, was the next time you went around the Christmastime date, or did you go the second time before Christmas? A. Maybe around — I don't know. I don't remember. Q. And do you remember who, how it was that you went the second time? A. I don't remember. Q. Okay. Do you remember who you went with the second time? A. I believe it was with Jane Doe No. 2. Q. Okay. Jane Doe No. 2? A. Yes. Q. So your recollection is you went with Jane Doe No. 2 the second time, just the two of you? A. Yes. Q Okay. Did Jane Doe No. 4 go with you the second time? A. I don't remember. Q. Did, did Jane Doe No. 4 ever go with you again? A. Yes Q. Okay. When did she go with you again? A. When I took her. 9 So our recollection is that she, she was
+
+there the first time, but you don't recall seeing her either the second or the third time but only the fourth time when you took her? A. Correct. Q. And when you took Jane Doe No. 2 the second time, you already described for me, so <sup>I</sup> won't belabor it as to say what your conversation was with both Jane Doe No. 2 and as well J.L. Remember we talked about that a little earlier? A. Yes. THE VEDEOGRAPHER: Sir, you're covering your microphone. BY MR. CRITTON: Q. We talked about that earlier, correct? A. Yes. Q. Okay. So when you, when you took Jane Doe No. 2 the second time, did you pick her up? A. Yes. Q. And did you pick her up in your 2006 Toyota Corolla? MR. MERMELSTEIN: Objection to form. THE WITNESS: I picked her up in my car, yes. BY MR. CRITTON: Q. Which was the 2006 Toyota Corolla?
+
+Page 261
+
+MR. MERMELSTELN: Font. THE WITNESS: Or I don't know what year it was. I don't remember. BY MR CRITTON: Q. I'm just — I'm telling you what — I'm repeating back what you told me earlier today. A. Well, I think I'm going to correct you. <sup>I</sup> think it was an older model, model than that. Q. Okay. So, anyhow, you picked her up in your car? A. Yep. Q. And when you got in the car did you say, did you say anything else to her other than what you told early, told me earlier that you said to both Jane Doe No. 2 and to J.L. about him maybe asking you to take your clothes off, him asking you that he may try to touch you, and do what you feel comfortable with? A. That you're not allowed to talk to him. Q. Okay. Anything else? A. Not that I remember, no. Q. Okay. And when you got over there, how, how were the arrangements made for you to bring Jane Doe No. 2 over there? A. Haley set it up.
+
+(Pages 258 to 261)
+
+![](_page_13_Picture_16.jpeg)
+
+1 Q. Well, Haley set it up? 2 A. Yes. 3 Q. Okay. But you're sure she didn't go with 4 you? 5 A. I believe so. 6 Q. You don't believe? 7 A. I do believe so. 8 Q. You, you believe she did not go? 9 A. Correct. 10 Q. Okay. So, so you get over there. You 11 drive over to the same location. Did you remember 12 how to get there, or did you have to get directions? 13 A. I don't remember. 14 Q. And when you got over there -- but somehow 15 you got over there. And did you go in the same 16 entrance again? 17 A. Yes. 18 Q. Okay. And when you were there, what did 19 you do? That is, you parked your car. Did you pull 20 into the driveway? 21 A. Yes. 22 Q. Did you go in the side door again? 23 A. The kitchen. 24 Q. The kitchen. And when you get into the 25 kitchen, who was there on this occasion?
+
+Page 263
+
+1 A. The chef. 2 Q. Anyone else? 3 A. The housekeeper. 4 Q. Okay. Do you remember what her name was? 5 A. I was never — 6 Q. He or she, was it a he or she? 7 A. It was a her. 8 Q. All right. And what happened, then? 9 A. I got let in the house. We went into the 10 house. 11 Q. Who went upstairs with Jane Doe No. 2? 12 A. I don't remember. 13 Q. Did you go? 14 A. No. 15 Q. Okay. Because you never went up again? 16 A. Right. 17 Q. Did you ever see Mr. Epstein again at his 18 house? 19 A. Yes. 20 Q. Okay. But not that occasion? 21 A. Correct. 22 Q. So somehow Jane Doe No. 2 got upstairs? 23 A. (Witness nods head.) 24 Q. Yes? 25 A. Yes, I don't
+
+1 Q. Did she at any time say to you, you know, 2 I don't think I really want to do this? 3 A. No. 4 Q. Okay. Did you ever discourage her from 5 doing it? 6 A. Not that I remember. 7 Q. Okay. I think you already told me earlier 8 is despite the fact that you were shocked, were 9 emotionally disturbed, that you thought it was a 10 terrible experience, you still took Jane Doe No. 2? 11 A. Yes. 12 MR. MERMELSTEIN: Objection, asked and 13 answered numerous times. 14 BY MR. CRITTON: 15 Q. So, you go up — so she goes upstairs. 16 How long was she upstairs? 17 A. I don't know. 18 Q. What did you do when you were downstairs? 19 A. Hang out in the kitchen. 20 Q. Did you have anything to eat, drink? 21 A. No. 22 Q. Just hung in the kitchen? 23 A. (Witness nods head.) 24 Q. All right. 25 THE COURT REPORTER That's a yes?
+
+Page 265
+
+1 THE WITNESS: Yes, sorry. 2 BY MR. CRITTON: 3 Q. Okay. Anything else happen? Anything 4 else unusual, usual, or you just hung in the 5 kitchen; you waited for her to come back? 6 A. Correct. 7 Q. Okay. And she comes back downstairs? 8 A. Yes. 9 Q. And do you leave? 10 A. Yes 11 Q. Okay. Did you see anyone else? 12 A. Not that I remember. 13 Q. Okay. So you get back in your car and 14 where did you two go? 15 Well, in fact, before that is, did you 16 receive any money for bringing, having brought Jane 17 Doe No. 2 there on the second occasion? 18 A. Yes. 19 Q. And who gave you the money? 20 A. I don't remember who gave it to me. 21 Q. Do you know how you got the money? Was it 22 handed to you? Did you get it when you were there? 23 Did you 24 A. I don't remember. 25 Q. So, but how much did you get?
+
+22 (Pages 262 to 265)
+
+1 A. A hundred.  
+2 Q. Did Jane Doe No. 2 know that you had  
+3 received money for taking her there?  
+4 A. Yes.  
+5 Q. Because you told her?  
+6 A. Yes.  
+7 Q. You got back in the car. Did Jane Doe No.  
+8 2 say anything to you?  
+9 A. Not that I remember.  
+10 Q. All right. And so you drove where? Where  
+11 did you go after that?  
+12 A. I don't remember.  
+13 Q. Did you go back to anybody's house? Did  
+14 you go out that night, or do you have any  
+15 recollection?  
+16 A. I do not remember what we did after.  
+17 Q. All right. The, the third time you went,  
+18 you took who, J.L.?  
+19 A. Yes.  
+20 Q. All right. And did anyone go with you on  
+21 that occasion?  
+22 A. No, I went by myself.  
+23 Q. Okay. You're sure neither Haley nor,  
+24 excuse me, Jane Doe No. 4 went with you?  
+25 A. Yes, I'm sure.
+
+1 the [REDACTED]?  
+2 A. I don't remember.  
+3 Q. Do you know whether it was the same [REDACTED]?  
+4 A. No.  
+5 Q. So you both go into the kitchen. Other  
+6 than the [REDACTED] was anybody else there? This is now  
+7 the third visit.  
+8 A. No.  
+9 Q. So, how did J.L. get upstairs to give the  
+10 massage?  
+11 A. I don't remember who took her up.  
+12 Q. You don't remember seeing anybody else  
+13 other than the [REDACTED] though, at least before she  
+14 went upstairs, correct?  
+15 A. Correct.  
+16 Q. All right. And I think, again, so as not  
+17 to repeat it, what you told me earlier about Ms.--  
+18 taking J.L. and what you told Jane Doe No. 2, that  
+19 would apply to what you had told her going, up until  
+20 the time she went upstairs, correct?  
+21 A. I'm confused on what you're saying.  
+22 Q. Well, we talked -- I don't want to have to  
+23 repeat because Stuart will object as I'm being  
+24 repetitious, so when we talked about what you had  
+25 told J.L. --
+
+1 Q. And how did you make arrangements to take  
+2 your -- one of your best friends, J.L., there?  
+3 A. Haley.  
+4 Q. All right. And when you, did you  
+5 basically follow the same procedure you had with  
+6 Jane Doe No. 2; that is, you drove to the house.  
+7 You went in the kitchen?  
+8 A. Yes.  
+9 Q. Okay. Was anybody there at that time in  
+10 the kitchen?  
+11 A. No.  
+12 Q. Okay. So you're in the house. How did  
+13 you get in the door or was it open?  
+14 A. No. Some -- the, the chef was always there.  
+15 Q. All right. So the chef's in the kitchen.  
+16 Did he open the door for you?  
+17 A. Yes.  
+18 Q. Okay. So the two of you come in?  
+19 A. Yes.  
+20 Q. All right. And do you remember what J.L.  
+21 had on?  
+22 A. No.  
+23 Q. Okay. Do you remember what you had on?  
+24 A. No.  
+25 Q. So, you sit in, you -- did you recognize
+
+1 A. [REDACTED], yes.  
+2 Q. -- about everything, you know, what to --  
+3 what to, in essence, what to expect, you, you, I  
+4 don't need to repeat that --  
+5 A. Yes.  
+6 Q. -- correct?  
+7 A. Yes.  
+8 Q. All right. And did you tell, did you tell  
+9 either of them if you're asked your age to tell them  
+10 you're 19?  
+11 A. No.  
+12 Q. Had you told either one of them then?  
+13 A. No.  
+14 Q. All right. Do you know how old Jane Doe  
+15 No. 2 was at the time you took her?  
+16 A. No.  
+17 Q. Do you know how old J.L. was when you took  
+18 her?  
+19 A. No.  
+20 Q. Were they approximate -- were they in your  
+21 age, in your class at school? And I think you said  
+22 Jane Doe No. 2 was.  
+23 A. Jane Doe No. 2 was, yes.  
+24 Q. Was J.L. older?  
+25 A. Yes.
+
+Page 2 APPEARANCES: On behalf of the Plaintiff: STUART S. MERMELSTEIN, ESQUIRE MERMELSTEIN & HOROWTT2, PA 18205 Biscayne Boulevard Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160 Phone: 305.931.2200 E-mail: Ssm@sexabuseattomey.com On behalf of the Defendant: ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR, ESQUIRE BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN, LLP 303 Banyan Boulevard Suite 400 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Phone: 561.842.2820 E-mail: Icadwell@bc1claw.corn ALSO PRESENT: Sascha Quimby, Videographer Visual Evidence, Incorporated
+
+Page 3 INDEX EXAMINATION DIRECT CROSS REDIRECT JANE DOE NO.3 BY MR. CRITTON 4 EXHIBITS Damn DESCRIPTION PAGE DEFENDANTS EX. 1 115 PSYCHOLOGICAUSOC1AL HISTORY FORM DEFENDANTS EX. 2 170 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
+
+1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Page 4 PROCEEDINGS Deposition taken before Cynthia Registered Professional Reporter, Florida Professional Reporter, and Notary Public in and for the State of Florida at large, in the above cause. THE VIDEOGRAPHER: This is the 19th day of February, 2010. The time is 10:07 am. This is the videotaped deposition of Jane Doe No. 3 in the matter of Jane Doe No. 2 versus Epstein. This deposition is being held at 250 Australian Avenue South, West Palm Beach, Florida. My name is Sascha Quimby. I am the videographer representing Visual Evidence, Inc. Will the attorneys please announce their appearances for the record. MR. MERMELSTEIN: Stuart Mermelstein for Plaintiff, Jane Doe 3. MR. CRITTON: Bob Critton on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein. Thereupon, (JANE DOE NO.3) having been first duly sworn or affirmed, was examined and testified as follows:
+
+1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Page 5 THE WITNESS: Yes. DIRECT EXAMINATION BY MR. CRITTON: Q. Would you please tell me your full name. A. Jane Doe No. 3. Q. Give me your date of birth, please. A. March 5th, 1988. Q. And do you know your Social Security number? A IS Q. Ms. Jane Doe No. 3, have you ever had your deposition taken before? A. Yes. Q. When? A. From the police department. Q. That was a sworn statement? A. Okay. So then, no. Q. Was there a court reporter there that took it or was it — A. No. Q. In what fashion did you give a sworn statement to the police department? A. Explain further. Q. What were the circumstances of your giving a sworn statement?
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740259/EFTA02740259.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740259/EFTA02740259.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..873b219b6f4e9523f94bcb04d0d67e1f13dc6240
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740259/EFTA02740259.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,691 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740259.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 17,
+  "chars": 52780,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 17.59,
+  "image_assets": [
+    "_page_8_Picture_12.jpeg",
+    "_page_13_Picture_16.jpeg"
+  ],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            182.988,
+            67.23
+          ],
+          [
+            412.234130859375,
+            67.23
+          ],
+          [
+            412.234130859375,
+            95.84210205078125
+          ],
+          [
+            182.988,
+            95.84210205078125
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Related cases:",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            89.352,
+            276.21000000000004
+          ],
+          [
+            207.81475830078125,
+            276.21000000000004
+          ],
+          [
+            207.81475830078125,
+            291.9620361328125
+          ],
+          [
+            89.352,
+            291.9620361328125
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            190.332,
+            408.24
+          ],
+          [
+            389.92755126953125,
+            408.24
+          ],
+          [
+            389.92755126953125,
+            423.5820617675781
+          ],
+          [
+            190.332,
+            423.5820617675781
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            59
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            30
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            17
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            854
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            108
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            64
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            5
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            918
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            133
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            266
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            133
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            17
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            975
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            189
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            897
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            108
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            940
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            109
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            46
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            5
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            236
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            115
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            1010
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            115
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "Picture",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 9,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            225
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            110
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 10,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            285
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            138
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 11,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            943
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            110
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 12,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            873
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            111
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            9
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 13,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            917
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            115
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            14
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Picture",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 14,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            234
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            116
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            13
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 15,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            16
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            6
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 16,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            281
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            139
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02740259"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740259/_page_13_Picture_16.jpeg b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740259/_page_13_Picture_16.jpeg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..07109a3c282e304cfecf173af3eb533355bc882d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740259/_page_13_Picture_16.jpeg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:6f4f9f2eec1acef04713559a439dd633272564225cfaab70e26287b187e341bc
+size 2941
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740259/_page_8_Picture_12.jpeg b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740259/_page_8_Picture_12.jpeg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2b5534c9a6f3c9b6d3ba8b2f8049a1a72d296299
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740259/_page_8_Picture_12.jpeg
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1
+oid sha256:9bef817a4c5202a0f23a9bdebf484e0a5fc91beaf78f20c2a074cb1dad3f1364
+size 2318
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740276/EFTA02740276.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740276/EFTA02740276.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e36cb77547b696a9aead622c2189881a8eae61cc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740276/EFTA02740276.md
@@ -0,0 +1,483 @@
+#### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CIV-80232-MARRA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+v.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+/
+
+# DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, INCLUDING SUPPORTING MEMORANDUM OF LAW
+
+Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, ("EPSTEIN"), by and through his undersigned counsel, seeks summary judgment determining that under the undisputed material facts, (1) the version of 18 U.S.C. §2255, effective 1999 to Jul. 26, 2006, the period of time during which EPSTEIN's alleged conduct occurred, applies to Plaintiff JANE DOE NO. 3's claim brought pursuant to §2255 in Count III of the Second Amended Complaint [D.E. 50]; (2) Plaintiff has failed to and cannot establish a predicate act — under 18 U.S.C. §2422 as plead in her complaint, in order to state a cause of action pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §2255 (2005); and (3) the version of 18 U.S.C. § 2255 in effect when the predicate acts allegedly were committed allow only "minors" to file suit. Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P. (2010); Local Gen. Rules 7.1, and 7.5 (S.D. Fla. 2010). In support of his motion, Defendant states:
+
+#### Introduction
+
+Defendant, without waiving any affirmative defense or grounds which may entitle him to summary judgment in this action or in any other actions brought by other plaintiffs
+
+Case No. 08-CV-80232-Marra
+
+Page 2
+
+in multiple civil actions asserting §2255 and other claims against EPSTEIN, seeks summary judgment regarding the proper application of 18 U.S.C. §2255. Based on the undisputed material facts and applicable law relevant to the summary judgment sought, Defendant is entitled as a matter of law to the entry of summary judgment determining that (1) the version of 18 U.S.C. §2255, effective 1999 to Jul. 26, 2006, the period of time during which EPSTEIN's alleged conduct occurred, applies to Plaintiff's claim brought pursuant to §2255; (2) Plaintiff has not and cannot establish the requisite elements to state a claim under 18 U.S.C. §2255, which she attempts to assert in Count III of her Second Amended Complaint [D.E. 50]. In particular, the undisputed material facts show that Plaintiff has failed to and cannot establish a predicate act —under 18 U.S.C. §2422 as plead in her complaint, in order to state a cause of action pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §2255 (2004); and (3) the version of 18 U.S.C. § 2255 in effect when the predicate acts allegedly were committed allow only "minors" to file suit. The pleadings and the discovery materials on file show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact establishing that EPSTEIN is entitled as a matter of law to the summary judgments sought.
+
+#### Statement of Material Facts in Support of Summary Judgment, Loc.Gen.Rule 7.5 Statement of the Case
+
+I. Plaintiff JANE DOE NO. 3's Second Amended Complaint [D.E. 50], dated February 27, 2009, attempts to assert three causes of action. Count I and Count II, respectively, attempt to allege state law claims under Florida law for "Sexual Assault and Battery," and "Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress." Count III, which is the subject of this motion, is entitled "Coercion and Enticement to Sexual Activity in
+
+Case No. 08-CV-80232-Marra
+
+Page 3
+
+Violation of 18 U.S.C. §2422," and attempts to assert a claim pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §2255. (Plaintiff JANE DOE NO. 3 shall be referred to as "JD3" or "Jane" or "Jane Doe." Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint shall be referred to as "2d Am Comp," and is attached hereto as Exhibit A.).
+
+2. According to the allegations - "In or about 2004-2005, Jane Doe, then approximately 16 years old, fell into Epstein's trap and became one of his victims." [2d Am Comp, ¶8]. She had one encounter with Epstein; (after the one encounter she brought other girls to Epstein's Palm Beach home as specified below). (2d Am Comp. ¶14). Plaintiff further alleges that —
+
+recruited Jane Doe to give Epstein a massage for monetary compensation. brought Jane to Epstein's mansion in Palm Beach. Jane was led up the flight of stairs to the room with the massage table. She was alone in the room when Epstein arrived wearing a towel to cover his private parts. He laid down on the massage table, and sexually assaulted Jane Doe during the massage. In addition, Jeffrey Epstein masturbated during the massage. [2d Am Comp, ¶12].
+
+... Jane was paid \$200 by Epstein. (2d Am Comp, ¶13).
+
+3. Material to this motion, in attempting to assert a claim in Count III pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §2255, Plaintiff alleges in material part that —
+
+- 29. Epstein used a facility or means of interstate commerce to knowingly persuade, induce or entice Jane Doe, when she was under the age of 18 years, to engage in prostitution or sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense.
+- 30. On June 30, 2008, Epstein entered a plea of guilty to violations of Florida §§796.07 and 796.03, in the 15th Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County (Case Nos. ...), for conduct involving the same plan or scheme as alleged herein.
+- 31. As to Plaintiff Jane Doe, Epstein could have been charged with criminal violations of Florida Statute §796.07(2)(including subsections (c), (d), (e), (f), (g), and (h) thereof), and other criminal offenses
+
+Case No. 08-CV-80232-Marra-M
+
+Page 4
+
+including violations of Florida Statutes §§798.02 and 800.04 (including subsections (5), (6) and (7) thereof).
+
+32. Epstein's acts and conduct are in violation of 18 U.S.C. §2422.
+
+33. As a result of Epstein's violation of 18 U.S.C. §2422, Plaintiff has suffered personal injury, including mental, psychological and emotional damages.
+
+4. In the "WHEREFORE" clause of Count III, Plaintiff "demands judgment against Jeffery Epstein for all damages available under 18 U.S.C. §2255(a), ." See 2d Am Comp, Count III, Exhibit A hereto.
+
+5. In trying to assert a violation of the federal criminal statute 18 U.S.C. 2422 as the requisite predicate act for a claim pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §2255(a)1, Plaintiff generally tracks the language of subsection (b) of 18 U.S.C. 2422 (eff. Apr. 30, 2003), which states in relevant part —
+
+(b) Whoever, using the mail or any facility or means of interstate or foreign commerce, or within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States knowingly persuades, induces, entices, or coerces any individual who has not attained the age of 18 years, to engage in prostitution or any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense, or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title and imprisoned not less than 5 years and not more than 30 years.
+
+See endnote 2 for complete text of statute.
+
+(See endnote 1 hereto for full text of 18 U.S.C. §2255, the version that applied in 2004, and the amended version effective July 27, 2006.)
+
+6. Epstein never, using a facility or means of interstate commerce, knowingly persuaded, induced or enticed JD3, when she was under the age of 18 years, to engage in prostitution or sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense, or attempted to do so. (Deposition Testimony of JD3, taken February 19 2010.
+
+Case No. 08-CV-80232-Marra-
+
+Page 5
+
+See pages referenced below herein). A copy of the referenced deposition pages is attached hereto as Exhibit B. See endnote 2 for full text of 18 U.S.C. §2422.2
+
+7. JD3 testified that she first learned of Epstein ("Jeffrey") through Jane Doe No. 4, (another Plaintiff in a lawsuit against Epstein), and and through other girls, Jane Doe No. 7 and J.S. (JD3 Deposition, pp. 84-90). According to JD3, while at the home of Jane Doe No. 4, told her "You can make quick money, 200 bucks just to give a guy a massage." Haley said his name and that he live in Palm Beach. (JD3 Deposition, p. 90, lines 12-24). JD3 and Jane Doe 4 "were good friends" at the time. (Id, p. 104). JD3 learned at some point "through word of mouth" that Jane Doe 4 had been to Epstein's house because they "all hung out together." (Id, p. 92-93).
+
+8. Jane Doe 4 told her "you give him a massage." (Id, p. 95, Lines 8-9). Haley said the same — you give a 1/2 hour massage for \$200. (P. 96, p. 217). Haley telephone JD3 twice and asked if she wanted to give Epstein a massage for \$200. JD3 thought about it and eventually JD3 agreed to do so and Haley "set it up." (Id, p. 218-20).
+
+9. JD4 and JD7, who had been to Epstein's home and who are both represented by the same law firm as JD3, JD2, JD5 and JD6 in other actions against Epstein before this Court, were friends of JD3 and led JD3 to believe it was no big deal to go to Epstein's home and that nothing inappropriate had ever occurred. (JD3 Deposition, pp. 143-145). Now that they seek millions in damages, Plaintiffs' version of the facts has changed substantially.
+
+10. JD3 never spoke with Epstein by phone, and never received or sent a text or email or computer/electronic communication from Epstein. (JD3 Deposition, p. 222).
+
+Case No. 08-CV-80232-Marra-M
+
+Page 6
+
+There is no deposition testimony or allegations that JD3 ever traveled anywhere by any means with Epstein.
+
+11. JD3 went to Epstein's Palm Beach home a total of four times. (JD3 deposition, p. 19, lines 19-21). Although JD3 only gave Epstein the "massage" the one time, afterwards she brought back other girls and got paid for it, even picking up the girls in her own car. (JD3 Deposition, p. 175, lines 8-25, p. 176, lines 1-14; p. 259-62, p. 266).
+
+12. JD3's date of birth is March 5, 1988. (JD3 Deposition, p. 5). The original Complaint [D.E. 1] in this matter was filed on March 5, 2008. JD3 turned 18 on March 5, 2006. Thus, JD3 was 20 years old at the time this suit was filed.
+
+# Summary Judgment Standard
+
+Summary judgment is proper under Rule 56(c)(2), Fed.R.Civ.P, when there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Celotex v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 106 S.Ct. 2548, 2552, 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986). Pursuant to Rule 56(b), "a party against whom relief is sought may move, with or without supporting affidavits, for summary judgment on all or part of the claim."
+
+As stated by the Supreme Court in Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322-323, 106 S.Ct. 2548, 2552 (1986)
+
+.., summary judgment is proper "if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law." In our view, the plain language of Rule 56(c) mandates the entry of summary judgment, after adequate time for discovery and upon motion, against a party who fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to that party's case, and on which that party will bear the burden of proof at trial. In such a situation, there can be "no genuine issue as to any material fact," since a complete failure of proof concerning an essential element of the nonmoving party's case necessarily renders all other facts immaterial. The moving party is
+
+Case No. 08-CV-80232-Marra-.M
+
+Page 7
+
+"entitled to a judgment as a matter of law" because the nonmoving party has failed to make a sufficient showing on an essential element of her case with respect to which she has the burden of proof.
+
+### Discussion of Law as Applied to Undisputed Material Facts Showing that EPSTEIN Is Entitled to Summary Judgment as a Matter of Law.
+
+I. The version of 18 U.S.C. 42255 in effect at the time the purported conduct took place applies to the Plaintiff's 42255 claim against EPSTEIN, not the version as amended and effective July 27, 2006.
+
+The applicable version of 18 U.S.C. §2255 provides —
+
+# PART I--CRIMES
+
+### CHAPTER 110--SEXUAL EXPLOITATION AND OTHER ABUSE OF CHILDREN § 2255. Civil remedy for personal injuries
+
+(a) Any minor who is a victim of a violation of section 2241(c), 2242, 2243, 2251, 2251A, 2252, 2252A, 2260, 2421, 2422, or 2423 of this title and who suffers personal injury as a result of such violation may sue in any appropriate United States District Court and shall recover the actual damages such minor sustains and the cost of the suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee. Any minor as described in the preceding sentence shall be deemed to have sustained damages of no less than \$50,000 in value.
+
+(See endnote 1 for complete statutory text, pre and post amendment.)
+
+By its own terms, 18 U.S.C. 2255(a) creates a cause of action for "a minor who is a victim of a violation of section 2241(c), 2242, 2243, 2251, 2251A, 2252, 2252A, 2260, 2421, 2422, or 2423 of this title and who suffers personal injury as a result of such violation ... ." See generally, v Husband 428 F.Supp.2d 432 (RD. Va. 2006); =v. Husband, 376 F.Supp.2d 603 (E.D. Va. 2006); Doe v. Liberatore, 478 F.Supp.2d 742, 754 (M.D. Pa. 2007). The referenced statutes are all federal criminal statues contained in Title 18 of the United States Code. Thus, in order to sustain a cause of action under §2255, a plaintiff is required to prove all the elements of one of the statutory enumerated criminal predicate acts. See Gray v. Darby, 2009 WL 805435 (E.D. Pa. Mar.
+
+Case No. 08-CV-80232-Marra-M
+
+Page 8
+
+25, 2005), requiring evidence to establish predicate act under 18 U.S.C. §2255 to state cause of action.
+
+I. A. The statute in effect during the time the alleged conduct occurred applies to each of the Plaintiff's claim brought pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §2255 — not the amended version which became effective on July 27, 2006. See endnote 1 for complete statutory text in effect prior to July 27, 2006 and as amended.
+
+Plaintiff in her complaint asserts that the alleged conduct by EPSTEIN occurred prior to the amended version of §2255 taking effect. Based on JD3's deposition testimony, she had one encounter with Epstein (and three other visits to his house at which she brought other girls but did not have any encounter with Epstein) in or about 2004-2005. Thus, it is undisputed Epstein's conduct occurred prior to §2255's amendment, effective July 27, 2006.
+
+Under applicable law, the statute in effect at the time of the alleged conduct applies. See U.S. v. Scheidt, Slip Copy, 2010 WL 144837, fn. 1 (E.D.Ca1. Jan. 11, 2010); U.S. v. Renga 2009 WL 2579103, fn. 1 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 19, 2009); U.S. v. Ferenci, 2009 WL 2579102, fn. 1 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 19, 2009); U.S. v. Monk, 2009 WL 2567831, fn. 1 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 18, 2009); U.S. v. Zane, 2009 WL 2567832, fn.1 (RD. Cal. Aug. 18 2009). In each of these cases, the referenced footnote states —
+
+Prior to July 27, 2006, the last sentence in Section §2255(a) read "Any person as described in the preceding sentence shall be deemed to have sustained damages of no less than \$50,000 in value." Under the civil statute, the minimum restitution amount for any violation of Section 2252 (the predicate act at issue) is \$150,000 for violations occurring after July 27, 2006 and \$50,000 for violations occurring prior to \$50,000.
+
+Even with the typo (the extra "\$50,000") at the end of the quoted sentence, it is
+
+Page 9
+
+clear that the Court applied the statute in effect at the time of the alleged criminal conduct constituting one of the statutorily enumerated predicate acts, which is consistent with applicable law discussed more fully below herein.
+
+It is an axiom of law that "retroactivity is not favored in the law." Bowen, 488 U.S., at 208, 109 S.Ct., at 471 (1988). As eloquently stated in Landgraf v. USI Film Products, 114 S.Ct. 1483, 1497, 511 U.S. 244, 265-66 (1994):
+
+... the presumption against retroactive legislation is deeply rooted in our jurisprudence, and embodies a legal doctrine centuries older than our Republic. Elementary considerations of fairness dictate that individuals should have an opportunity to know what the law is and to conform their conduct accordingly; settled expectations should not be lightly disrupted.<sup>FN18</sup> For that reason, the "**principle that the legal effect of conduct should ordinarily be assessed under the law that existed when the conduct took place has timeless and universal appeal.**" *Kaiser*, 494 U.S., at 855, 110 S.Ct., at 1586 (SCALIA, J., concurring). In a free, dynamic society, creativity in both commercial and artistic endeavors is fostered by a rule of law that gives people confidence about the legal consequences of their actions.
+
+FN18. See *General Motors Corp. v. Romein*, 503 U.S. 181, 191, 112 S.Ct. 1105, 1112, 117 L.Ed.2d 328 (1992) ("Retroactive legislation presents problems of unfairness that are more serious than those posed by prospective legislation, because it can deprive citizens of legitimate expectations and upset settled transactions"); [Further citations omitted].
+
+It is therefore not surprising that the **antiretroactivity principle finds expression in several provisions of our Constitution. The *Ex Post Facto* Clause flatly prohibits retroactive application of penal legislation.**<sup>FN19</sup> Article I, § 10, cl. 1, prohibits States from passing another type of retroactive legislation, laws "impairing the Obligation of Contracts." The Fifth Amendment's Takings Clause prevents the Legislature (and other government actors) from depriving private persons of vested property rights except for a "public use" and upon payment of "just compensation." The prohibitions on "Bills of Attainder" in Art. I, §§ 9-10, prohibit legislatures from singling out disfavored persons and meting out summary punishment for past conduct. See, *e.g.*, *United States v. [REDACTED]*, 381 U.S. 437, 456-462, 85 S.Ct. 1707, 1719-1722, 14 L.Ed.2d 484 (1965). The Due Process Clause also protects the interests in fair notice and repose that may be compromised by retroactive legislation; a justification sufficient to validate a statute's prospective application under the Clause "may not suffice" to warrant its retroactive application. *Usery v. Turner Elkhorn Mining Co.*, 428 U.S. 1, 17, 96 S.Ct. 2882, 2893, 49 L.Ed.2d 752 (1976).
+
+FN19. Article I contains two *Ex Post Facto* Clauses, one directed to Congress (§ 9, cl. 3), the other to the States (§ 10, cl. 1). We have construed the Clauses as
+
+Case No. 08-CV-80232-Marra-M
+
+Page 10
+
+applicable only to penal legislation. See Calder v. Bull, 3 DalI. 386, 390-391, 1 L.Ed. 648 (1798) (opinion of Chase, J.).
+
+These provisions demonstrate that retroactive statutes raise particular concerns. The Legislature's unmatched powers allow it to sweep away settled expectations suddenly and without individualized consideration. Its responsivity to political pressures poses a risk that it may be tempted to use retroactive legislation as a means of retribution against unpopular groups or individuals. As Justice Marshall observed in his opinion for \*9498 the Court in Weaver v. Graham, 450 U.S. 24, 101 &Ct. 960, 67 L.Ed.2d 17 (1981), the Ex Post Facto Clause not only ensures that individuals have "fair warning" about the effect of criminal statutes, but also "restricts governmental power by restraining arbitrary and potentially vindictive legislation." Id, at 28-29, 101 S.Ct., at 963-964 (citations omitted). F142°
+
+FN20. See Richmond v. J. A. Croson Co., 488 U.S. 469, 513-514, 109 S.Ct. 706, 732, 102 L.Ed.2d 854 (1989) ("Legislatures are primarily policymaking bodies that promulgate rules to govern future conduct. The constitutional prohibitions against the enactment of ex post facto laws and bills of attainder reflect a valid concern about the use of the political process to punish or characterize past conduct of private citizens. It is the judicial system, rather than the legislative process, that is best equipped to identify past wrongdoers and to fashion remedies that will create the conditions that presumably would have existed had no wrong been committed") (STEVENS, J., concurring in part and concurring in judgment); James v. United States, 366 U.S. 213, 247, n. 3, 81 S.Ct. 1052, 1052, n. 3, 6 L.Ed.2d 246 (1961) (retroactive punitive measures may reflect "a purpose not to prevent dangerous conduct generally but to impose by legislation a penalty against specific persons or classes of persons").
+
+These well entrenched constitutional protections and presumptions against retroactive application of legislation establish that 18 U.S.C. §2255 in effect at the time of the alleged conduct applies to the instant action, and not the amended version. See endnote 1 hereto.
+
+I. B. Not only is there no clear express intent stating that the statute is to apply retroactively, but applying the current version of the statute, as amended in 2006, would be in clear violation of the Ex Post Facto Clause of the United States Constitution as it would be applied to events occurring before its enactment and would increase the penalty or punishment for the alleged crime. U.S. Const. Art. 1, §9, cl. 3, §10, cl. 1. U.S. v.
+
+Case No. 08-CV-80232-Marra-M
+
+Page 11
+
+Seigel, 153 F.3d 1256 (11th Cir. 1998); U.S. v. M, 162 F.3d 87 (3d Cir. 1998); and generally, Calder v. Bull, 3 U.S. 386, 390, 1 L.Ed. 648, 1798 WL 587 (Calder) (1798).
+
+The United States Constitution provides that "[n]o Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed" by Congress. U.S. Const. art. I, § 9, cl. 3. A law violates the Ex Post Facto Clause if it " `appli[es] to events occurring before its enactment ... [and] disadvantage[s] the offender affected by it' by altering the definition of criminal conduct or increasing the punishment for the crime." Lynce v. Mathis, 519 U.S. 433, 117 S.Ct. 891, 137 L.Ed.2d 63 (1997) (quoting Weaver v. Graham. 450 U.S. 24, 29, 101 S.Ct. 960, 67 L.Ed.2d 17 (1981)).
+
+U.S. v. Siegel,153 F.3d 1256, 1259 (11th Cir. 1998).
+
+§2255 is contained in Title 18 of the United States Codes - "Crimes and Criminal Procedure, Part I. Crimes, Chap. 110. Sexual Exploitation and Other Abuse of Children." 18 U.S.C. §2255 (2005), is entitled Civil remedy for personal injuries, and imposes a presumptive minimum of damages in the amount of \$50,000, should Plaintiff prove any violation of the specified criminal statutes and that she suffered personal injury with actual damages sustained. Thus, the effect of the 2006 amendments, effective July 27, 2006, would be to triple the amount of the statutory minimum previously in effect during the time of the alleged acts.
+
+The statute, as amended in 2006, contains no language stating that the application is to be retroactive. Thus, there is no manifest intent that the statute is to apply retroactively, and, accordingly, the statute in effect during the time of the alleged conduct is to apply. Landgraf v. USI Film Products, supra, at 1493, ("A statement that a statute will become effective on a certain date does not even arguably suggest that it has any application to conduct that occurred at an earlier date."). See fn. 1 herein.
+
+This statute was enacted as part of the Federal Criminal Statutes targeting sexual predators and sex crimes against children. H.R. 3494, "Child Protection and Sexual
+
+Case No. 08-CV-80232-Marraa
+
+Page 12
+
+Predator Punishment Act of 1998;" House Report No. 105-557, 11, 1998 U.S.C.A.N. 678, 679 (1998). Quoting from the "Background and Need For Legislation" portion of the House Report No. 105-557, 11-16, H.R. 3494, of which 18 U.S.C. §2255 is included, is described as "the most comprehensive package of new crimes and increased penalties ever developed in response to crimes against children, particularly assaults facilitated by computers." Further showing that §2255 was enacted as a criminal penalty or punishment, "Title H — Punishing Sexual Predators," Sec. 206, from House Report No. 105-557, 5-6, specifically includes reference to the remedy created under §2255 as an additional means of punishing sexual predators, along with other penalties and punishments. Senatorial Comments in amending §2255 in 2006 confirm that the creation of the presumptive minimum damage amount is meant as an additional penalty against those who sexually exploit or abuse children. 2006 WL 2034118, 152 Cong. Rec. S8012- 02. Senator Kerry refers to the statutorily imposed damage amount as "penalties." Id.
+
+The cases of U.S. v. Siegel, supra (11th Cir. 1998), and U.S. v. supra (3d Cir. 1998), also support Defendant's position that application of the current version of 18 U.S.C. §2255 would be in clear violation of the Ex Post Facto Clause. In Siegel, the Eleventh Circuit found that the Ex Post Facto Clause barred application of the Mandatory Victim Restitution Act of 1996 (MVRA) to the defendant whose criminal conduct occurred before the effective date of the statute, 18 U.S.C. §3664(f)(1)(A), even though the guilty plea and sentencing proceeding occurred after the effective date of the statute. On July 19, 1996, the defendant Siegel pleaded guilty to various charges under 18 U.S.C. §371 and §1956(a)(I )(A), (conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud, bank fraud, and laundering of money instruments; and money laundering). He was sentenced on March
+
+Case No. 08-CV-80232-Marra-M
+
+Page 13
+
+7, 1997. As part of his sentence, Siegel was ordered to pay \$1,207,000.00 in restitution under the MVRA which became effective on April 24, 1996. Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214, 1229-1236. The 1996 amendments to MVRA required that the district court must order restitution in the full amount of the victim's loss without consideration of the defendant's ability to pay. Prior to the enactment of the MVRA and under the former 18 U.S.C. §3664(a) of the Victim and Witness Protection Act of 1982 (VWPA), Pub.l. No. 97-291, 96 Stat. 1248, the court was required to consider, among other factors, the defendant's ability to pay in determining the amount of restitution.
+
+When the MVRA was enacted in 1996, Congress stated that the amendments to the VWPA "shall, to the extent constitutionally permissible, be effective for sentencing proceedings in cases in which the defendant is convicted on or after the date of enactment of this Act [Apr. 24, 1996]." Siegel, supra at 1258. The alleged crimes occurred between February, 1988 to May, 1990. The Court agreed with the defendant's position that 1996 MVRA "should not be applied in reviewing the validity of the court's restitution order because to do so would violate the Ex Post Facto Clause of the United States Constitution. See U.S. Const. art 1, §9, cl. 3."
+
+The Ex Post Facto analysis made by the Eleventh Circuit in Siegel is applicable to this action. In resolving the issue in favor of the defendant, the Court first considered whether a restitution order is a punishment. Id at 1259. In determining that restitution was a punishment, the Court noted that §3663A(a)(1) of Title 18 expressly describes restitution as a "penalty." In addition, the Court also noted that "[a)lthough not in the context of an ex post facto determination, ... restitution is a `criminal penalty meant to have strong deterrent and rehabilitative effect.' United States v. Twitty 107 F.3d 1482,
+
+Case No. 08-CV-80232-Marra-M
+
+Page 14
+
+1493 n. 12 (I 1 th Cir.1997)." Second, the Court considered "whether the imposition of restitution under the MVRA is an increased penalty as prohibited by the Ex Post Facto Clause." Id, at 1259. In determining that the application of the 1996 MVRA would indeed run afoul of the Constitution's Ex Post Facto Clause, the Court agreed with the majority of the Circuits that restitution under the 1996 MVRA was an increased penalty.' "The effect of the MVRA can be detrimental to a defendant. Previously, after considering the defendant's financial condition, the court had the discretion to order restitution in an amount less than the loss sustained by the victim. Under the MVRA, however, the court must order restitution to each victim in the full amount." Id, at 1260. See also U.S. v. 162 F.2d 87 (3'd Circuit 1998).
+
+In the instant cases, in answering the first question, it is clear that that imposition of a minimum amount of damages, regardless of the amount of actual damages suffered by a minor victim, is meant to be a penalty or punishment. See statutory text and House Bill Reports, cited above herein, consistently referring to the presumptive minimum damages amount under §2255 as "punishment" or "penalties." According to the Ex Post Facto doctrine, although §2255 is labeled a "civil remedy," such label is not dispositive; "if the effect of the statute is to impose punishment that is criminal in nature, the ex post facto clause is implicated." See generally, Roman Catholic of Oakland v. Superior Court, 28 Cal.Rptr.3d 355, at 360, citing Kansas v. Hendricks, 521 U.S. 346, 360-61 (1997). The effect of applying the 2006 version of §2255 would be to triple the
+
+The Eleventh Circuit, in holding that "the MVRA cannot be applied to a person whose criminal conduct occurred prior to April 24, 1996," was "persuaded by the majority of districts on this issue." "Restitution is a criminal penalty carrying with it characteristics of criminal punishment." Siegel, supra at 1260. The Eleventh Circuit is in agreement with the Second, Third, Eighth, Ninth, and D.C. Circuits. See U.S. v. Futrell, 209 F.3d 1286, 1289-90 (11th Cir. 2000).
+
+Case No. 08-CV-80232-Marra-M
+
+Page 15
+
+amount of the presumptive minimum damages to a minor who proves the elements of her §2255 claim. The fact that a plaintiff proceeding under §2255 has to prove a violation of a criminal statute and suffer personal injury to recover damages thereunder, further supports that the imposition of a minimum amount, regardless of a victim's actual damages sustained, is meant and was enacted as additional punishment or penalty for violation of criminal sexual exploitation and abuse of minors.
+
+Accordingly, this Court is required to apply the statute in effect at the time of the alleged criminal acts. Not only is there no language in the 2006 statute stating that it is to apply retroactively, but further, such application of the 2006 version of 18 U.S.C. §2255 to acts that occurred prior to its effective date would have a detrimental and punitive effect on Defendant by tripling the presumptive minimum of damages available to a plaintiff, regardless of the actual damages suffered?
+
+I. C. As discussed above, 18 U.S.C. §2255 was enacted as part of the criminal statutory scheme to punish and penalize those who sexually exploit and abuse minors, and thus, the Ex Post Fact Clause prohibits a retroactive application of the 2006 amended version. Even if one were to argue that the statute is "civil" and the damages thereunder are "civil" in nature, under the analysis provided by the United States Supreme Court in Landgraf v. USI Film Products, 511 U.S. 244, 114 S.Ct. 1483 (1994), pertaining to civil statutes, not only is there no express intent by Congress to apply the new statute to past
+
+<sup>2</sup> In other filed civil actions attempting to assert §2255 claims against EPSTEIN, some plaintiffs also propose that the minimum damage amount is to apply on a per violation basis; the absurdity of such position is further magnified when one considers that the presumptive damages amount was tripled to \$150,000 by the 2006 amendment. Based on some plaintiffs' position, that amount would be multiplied even further based on the number of violations (along with injury) that she could prove. Clearly, the result is an unconstitutional increase in either a penalty or civil liability.
+
+Case No. 08-CV-80232-Marra-M
+
+Page 16
+
+conduct, but also, the clear effect of retroactive application of the statute would be to increase the potential liability for past conduct from a minimum of \$50,000 to \$150,000, and thus in violation of the constitutional prohibitions against such application. As noted, 18 U.S.C. §2255 is entitled "Civil remedy for personal injuries." Notwithstanding this label, the statute was enacted as part of the criminal statutory scheme to punish those who sexually exploit and abuse minors. Regardless of the actual damages suffered or proven by a minor, as long as a minor proves violation of a specified statutory criminal act under §2255 and personal injury, the defendant is held liable for the statutory imposed minimum.
+
+Although there does not exist any definitive ruling of whether the damages awarded under §2255 are meant as criminal punishment or a civil damages award, Defendant is still entitled to a determination as a matter of law that the statute in effect at the time of the alleged criminal conduct applies.
+
+As explained by the Landgraf court, supra at 280, and at 1505,3
+
+When a case implicates a federal statute enacted after the events in suit, the court's first task is to determine whether Congress has expressly prescribed the statute's proper reach. If Congress has done so, of course, there is no need to resort to judicial default rules. When, however, the statute contains no such express command, the court must determine whether the new statute would have retroactive effect, i.e., whether it would impair rights a party possessed when he acted, increase a party's liability for past conduct, or impose new duties with respect to transactions already completed. If the statute would operate retroactively, our traditional presumption teaches that it does not govern absent clear congressional intent favoring such a result.
+
+<sup>3</sup> In Landgraf, the United States Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the Court of Appeals and refused to apply new provisions of the Civil Rights Act of 1991 to conduct occurring before the effective date of the Act. The Court determined that statutory text in question, §102, was subject to the presumption against statutory retroactivity.
+
+Case No. 08-CV-80232-Marra-M
+
+Page 17
+
+Here, there is no clear expression of intent regarding the 2006 Act's application to conduct occurring well before its enactment. Clearly, however, as discussed in part B herein, the presumptive minimum amount of damages of \$150,000 was enacted as a punishment or penalty upon those who sexually exploit and abuse minors. See discussion of House Bill Reports and Congressional background above herein. The amount triples the previous amount for which a defendant might be found liable, regardless of the amount of actual damages a plaintiff has suffered and proven. The new statute imposes a substantial increase in the monetary liability for past conduct.
+
+As stated in Landgraf, "the extent of a party's liability, in the civil context as well as the criminal, is an important legal consequence that cannot be ignored." Courts have consistently refused to apply a statute which substantially increases a party's liability to conduct occurring before the statute's enactment. Landgraf, supra at 284-85. Even if plaintiff were to argue that retroactive application of the new statute "would vindicate its purpose more fully," even that consideration is not enough to rebut the presumption against retroactivity. Id, at 285-86. "The presumption against statutory retroactivity is founded upon sound considerations of general policy and practice, and accords with long held and widely shared expectations about the usual operation of legislation." Id.
+
+Accordingly, as a matter of law, this Court is required to apply the version of 18 U.S.C. §2255 (2004-05) in effect at the time of the alleged conduct by EPSTEIN directed to Plaintiff.
+
+#### II. Defendant is entitled to summary judgment on Count ill, as under the undisputed material facts, Plaintiff has failed to and can not show a violation of a requisite predicate act to sustain a claim pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
+
+Case No. 08-CV-80232-Marra-M
+
+Page 18
+
+As matter of law, Defendant is entitled to the entry of a summary judgment in his favor on Count III - entitled "Coercion and Enticement to Sexual Activity in Violation of 18 U.S.C. §2422." In reality, Count III is an attempt to bring a claim pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §2255(a), which creates a civil remedy for violations of certain federal criminal statutes as discussed herein. The undisputed material facts and applicable law show that Plaintiff does not and cannot establish the elements required to prove her §2255 claim.
+
+As confirmed by Plaintiff in her deposition testimony, the one encounter which is alleged as the basis for her Count III §2255 claim (and the visits to Epstein's home in which she brought other girls) took place sometime during 2004-05. As testified to by JD3, she heard about being able to get \$200 for giving a massage to a man in Palm Beach through conversations with friends. (See Statement of Facts above, 1112, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10). JD3 testified that the only phone calls were between her and Sarah and that the only thing mentioned was the giving of a massage for \$200. There was no discussion of the performance sexual activity or sexual conduct. There was absolutely no communications by phone, intemet, texting or other electronic means between Epstein and JD3. JD3 never traveled anywhere with Epstein. She drove herself and other girls to Epstein's Palm Beach home. (Id).
+
+The applicable version of 18 U.S.C. §2255 provides —
+
+# PART I--CRIMES
+
+# CHAPTER 110--SEXUAL EXPLOITATION AND OTHER ABUSE OF CHILDREN
+
+§ 2255. Civil remedy for personal injuries
+
+(a) Any minor who is a victim of a violation of section 2241(c), 2242, 2243, 2251, 2251A, 2252, 2252A, 2260, 2421, 2422, or 2423 of this title and who suffers personal injury as a result of such violation may sue in any appropriate United States District Court and shall recover the actual damages
+
+Case No. 08-CV-80232-Mana-M
+
+Page 19
+
+such minor sustains and the cost of the suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee. Any minor as described in the preceding sentence shall be deemed to have sustained damages of no less than \$50,000 in value.
+
+(See endnote 1 for complete statutory text.)
+
+By its own terms, 18 U.S.C. 2255(a) creates a cause of action for "a minor who is a victim of a violation of section 2241(c), 2242, 2243, 2251, 2251A, 2252, 2252A, 2260, 2421, 2422, or 2423 of this title and who suffers personal injury as a result of such violation ... ." See generally, Gray v. Darby, 2009 WL 805435, 6 (E.D.Pa.,2009)("§2255 establishes a civil remedy for personal injuries suffered as a result of the violation of specific sections of the Code [U.S.C. Title 18]. Under this section, any minor who is the victim of any of those sections may sue in federal court to recover 'the actual damages such minor sustains and the cost of the suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee!"); v. Husband 428 F.Supp.2d 432 (E.D. Va. 2006); v. Husband, 376 F.Supp.2d 603 (E.D. Va. 2006); Doe v. Liberatore, 478 F.Supp.2d 742, 754 (M.D. Pa. 2007). The referenced statutes are all federal criminal statues contained in Title 18 of the United States Code. In her complaint, Plaintiff partially tracks the language of 18 U.S.C. §2422(b) and cites generally to §2422 in an attempt to assert a claim under 18 U.S.C. §2255. (2d Am Corn, 129, 32-33). None of the State of Florida criminal statutes referenced by Plaintiff are a requisite predicate act required to prove a claim under 18 U.S.C. §2255. (See ¶30-31 of 2d Am Comp.).
+
+Thus, in order to sustain a cause of action under §2255, Plaintiff is required to prove all the elements of one of the statutory enumerated predicate acts. See Gray v. Darby, 2009 WL 805435 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 25, 2005), requiring evidence to establish predicate act under 18 U.S.C. §2255 to state cause of action. As noted above, Plaintiff is relying on
+
+Case No. 08-CV-80232-Marra-M
+
+Page 20
+
+§2422 of Title 18, and tracks the language of subsection (b) of that statute. There is no evidence whatsoever of EPSTEIN "using the mail or any facility or means of interstate or foreign commerce, or within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States knowingly persuades, induces, entices, or coerces any individual who has not attained the age of 18 years, to engage in prostitution or any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense, or attempts to do so, ... ."
+
+In order to show a violation of 18 U.S.C. §2422(b), four elements must be proven: (1) use of a facility of interstate commerce; (2) to knowingly persuade, induce, entice, or coerce; (3) any individual who is younger than 18; (4) to engage in any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense, or attempting to do so. U.S. v. 410 F.3d 1235, 1245 (10th Cir. 2005); U.S. v. Munro, 394 F.3d 865, 869 (10th Cir. 2005); U.S. v. Kaye, 451 F.Supp.2d 775, 782-83 (E.D. Va. 2006). The undisputed material facts show that EPSTEIN and JD3 never communicated at any time on any subject via the telephone, intemet, texting, e-mails, or other form of electronic communication. JD3 testified that she found out about getting \$200 for a massage from other girls. The only thing discussed with and JD3 over the phone was the giving of a massage for \$200. No other type of activity or conduct was discussed. There was no communication by any means in which sexual activity or illicit sexual conduct was brought up with Epstein. There is no testimony or complaint allegations that JD3 travelled anywhere with EPSTEIN by car or otherwise.
+
+Thus, there was no (1) use of a facility of interstate commerce; (2) to knowingly persuade, induce, entice, or coerce; (3) any individual who is younger than 18; (4) to engage in any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal
+
+Case No. 08-CV-80232-Marra-M
+
+Page 21
+
+offense, or attempting to do so. See for e.g., U.S. v. 506 F.3d 140, 150-51 (2d Cir. 2007). In a defendant was convicted of violating §2422(b) where he initiated contact with girl he believed was a minor in an Internet chat room called "I Love Older Men," repeatedly made sexual advances toward girl and her "friend," asked them for their pictures, steered the conversation toward sexual activities, described the acts that he would engage in with them, tried to set up a meeting with both of them, and appeared for a meeting with condoms and a Viagra pill in his car. Thus, the Circuit court agreed had the requisite intent to violate § 2422(b). The Circuit Court determined that a reasonable juror could also have found that the defendant took a substantial step beyond mere preparation when he arrived at the meeting place with two condoms and a Viagra pill in his car. See also U.S. v. Munro 394 F.3d 865, 870 (10th Cir.2005)(Defendant convicted of attempting to persuade a minor to engage in sexual acts by using computer connected to the intemet, under §2422(b), where chat room communications included defendant asking "girl" about her sexual history, her virginity, her experience wit oral sex, and the possibility of making a movie together; defendant further told "girl" about his desire to perform oral sex on her.); U.S. v. Barlow, 568 F.3d 215 (5th Cir. 2009). See also U.S. v. Kave, 451 F.Supp.2d 775, supra, where defendant engaged in lengthy "chat room" communications of a sexual nature with individual he believed was a 13 year old boy, described what he was going to do with 13 year old, and traveled to the home of the 13 year old.
+
+Thus, because the evidence (JD3's own sworn testimony) establishes that there was no violation of §2422(b), an essential element of Plaintiff's 18 U.S.0 §2255 claim asserted in Count HI is missing. The claim fails as a matter of law and Defendant is
+
+Case No. 08-CV-80232-Marra-M
+
+Page 22
+
+entitled to the entry of summary judgment on the claim. Summary judgment is proper under Rule 56(c)(2), Fed.R.Civ.P, when there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Celotex v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 106 S.Ct. 2548, 2552, 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986). Pursuant to Rule 56(b), "a party against whom relief is sought may move, with or without supporting affidavits, for summary judgment on all or part of the claim."
+
+Thus, under the undisputed material facts and applicable law, EPSTEIN is entitled to summary judgment on Count III of Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint as a matter of law. JD3's own testimony establishes that EPSTEIN never used a facility or means of interstate commerce to knowingly persuade, induce, entice, or coerce her to engage in any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense, or attempting to do so. 18 U.S.C. §2422(b). Under the undisputed material facts, JD3 cannot show a violation of the enumerated predicate act, §2422(b) on which she relies, in order to prove her claim pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §2255; thus, an essential element of her §2255 cannot be established, entitling Defendant to the entry of summary judgment on Count III.
+
+#### III. The Version of 18 U.S.C. § 2255 In Effect When The Predicate Acts Allegedly Were Committed Allowed Only "Minors" To File Suit.
+
+The Second Amended Complaint is predicated on conduct that occurred sometime in 2004 and 2005. JD3's date of birth is March 5, 1988. (See Statement Facts above). The original Complaint in this matter was filed on March 5, 2008. Thus, JD3 was 20 years old at the time this suit was filed and no longer a minor. (The age of majority under both federal and state law is 18 years old. See 18 U.S.C. §2256(1), defining a
+
+Case No. 08-CV-80232-Marra-M
+
+Page 23
+
+"minor" as "any person under the age of eighteen years;" and §1.01, Definitions, Fla. Stat., defining "minor" to include "any person who has not attained the age of 18 years.")
+
+From 1999 to July 26, 2006, 18 U.S.C. § 2255(a) provided:
+
+Any minor who is a victim of a violation of [certain specified federal statutes] and who suffers personal injury as a result of such violation may sue in any appropriate United States District Court and shall recover the actual damages such minor sustains and the cost of the suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee. Any minor as described in the preceding sentence shall be deemed to have sustained damages of no less than \$50,000 in value.
+
+It is well settled that in interpreting a statute, the court's inquiry begins with the text and structure of the law. CBS, Inc. v. Prime Time 24 Venture, 245 F.3d 1217, 1222 (11th Cir. 2001) ("We begin our construction of [a statutory provision] where courts should always begin the process of legislative interpretation, and where they often should end it as well, which is with the words of the statutory provision.") (quoting Harris v. Garner, 216 F.3d 970, 972 (11th Cir. 2000) (en bane)) (first alteration omitted). In this case, the plain text of the 2003 statute is both clear and unmistakable. It allowed only minors (or the representative of a then-minor, see Fed R. Civ. P. 17(c)) to initiate suit under § 2255. It provided only that "any minor ... may sue" and that "any minor ... shall recover the actual damages such minor sustains" as a result of the predicate acts. Id. (emphasis added). The law's use of the present tense further underscored its limited scope: It spoke of "any minor who is a victim," provided that "such minor ... shall recover" damages arising from the underlying offense, and stated that "any minor ... shall be deemed" to have sustained at least \$50,000 in damages. Id. (emphasis added). Where the statute's words are unambiguous—as the are here—the "judicial inquiry is
+
+Case No. 08-CV-80232-Marra-M
+
+Page 24
+
+complete." Merritt v. Dillard Paper Co., 120 F.3d 1181, 1186 (11th Cir. 1997) (citation omitted)). Under the pre-July, 2006 version of the statute, only minors could initiate suit.
+
+The recent case of U.S. v. Baker 2009 WL 4572785, \*7-8 (E.D. Tx Dec. 7, 2009), in discussing the restitution under 18 U.S.C. §2255 noted that when the statute was amended in 2006 — "Masha's Law increased the minimum damages amount from \$50,000 to \$150,000 and broadened the language of section 2255 to allow adults to recover for damages sustained while they were a minor." The plain reading of the statute makes clear that prior to the 2006 amendment, the remedy was created for the benefit of minors who suffered sexual exploitation as a result of violation of a statutorily enumerated criminal act(s).
+
+To the extent there is any ambiguity in the text—and there is none—the law's legislative history further underscores Congress's intent to limit the right of action to minors: "Current law provides for a civil remedy for personal injuries resulting from child pornography offenses. This section expands the number of sex offenses in which a minor may pursue a civil remedy for personal injuries resulting from the offense." H.R. Rep. 105-557, at 23 (1998), as reprinted in 1998 U.S.C.C.A.N. 678, 692. And perhaps most telling, Congress amended § 2255 in 2006—three years after the alleged misconduct in this case supposedly took place—to make the civil action available to persons who had turned 18 by the time they filed suit:
+
+(a) In general.—Any person who, while a minor, was a victim of a violation of section 2241(c), 2242, 2243, 2251, 2251A, 2252, 2252A, 2260, 2421, 2422, or 2423 of this title and who suffers personal injury as a result of such violation, regardless of whether the injury occurred while such person was a minor, may sue in any appropriate United States District Court and shall recover the actual damages such person sustains and the cost of the suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee. Any person
+
+Case No. 08-CV-80232-Marra-M
+
+Page 25
+
+as described in the preceding sentence shall be deemed to have sustained damages of no less than \$150,000 in value.
+
+18 U.S.C. § 2255 (2006) (emphasis added).
+
+The contrast between the prior and 2006 versions of § 2255 is stark. The 2006 law replaces each of the prior law's uses of the term "minor" with the term "person." Where the 2006 law does refer to a "minor," it changes the prior law's present-tense references ("is") to past-tense references ("was"). And the 2006 law's new language now makes clear that, unlike the prior statute, those victimized while under the age of 18 may sue after they turn 18. Given that amendments must be interpreted "to have real and substantial effect," v. I.N.S., 514 U.S. 386, 397 (1995), there can be no doubt that Congress recognized the prior statute's strict limitations and for the first time expanded the right of action to adults.
+
+Indeed, the history of the 2006 amendments clearly shows that Congress intended to change the law, not merely to clarify it. Those amendments were made by § 707 of the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act, Pub. L. No. 109-248, 120 Stat. 587, 650 (2006), and are known as "Masha's Law." As Senator Kerry—the author of Masha's Law—explained:
+
+What Masha's law does, and what is incorporated in here, is it changes "any minor" to "any person," so that if a minor is depicted in photographs pornographically that are distributed over the Internet, but by the time the abuser is caught, the minor is an adult, they can still recover. They cannot now, and that is ridiculous. It makes sure that recovery on the part of a minor can take place when they become an adult....
+
+Although I don't think there is any price too high to cost an individual who would take advantage of a minor, I think it is only appropriate to ... make sure that reaching the age of adulthood does not exempt someone from recovery. It is a tribute to continuing to do what this bill does, and
+
+Case No. 08-CV-80232-Marra-M
+
+Page 26
+
+that is look after the protection of minors and ensure that those who violate them are caught and punished and have to pay to the maximum extent.
+
+152 Cong. Rec. 58012-02 at 58016 (July 20, 2006) (statement of Sen. Kerry) (emphasis added). Courts typically give special weight to the statements of a bill's sponsor, Corley v. U.S., 129 S.Ct. 1558, 1569 (Apr. 6, 2009) ("[A] sponsor's statement to the full Senate carries considerable weight.").4 There is no basis to depart from that rule here.
+
+It thus is no answer that the pre-amended statute's limitations clause provided that "in the case of a person under a legal disability, [the complaint may be filed] not later than three years after the disability," 18 U.S.C. § 2255(b) (2003), such that the unamended version of the law implicitly must have permitted victims to sue even after they turned 18. That interpretation not only would render Masha's Law superfluous; it would make Masha's Law's internally redundant, because Masha's Law retained the "legal disability" language from the prior version of § 2255(b). See 18 U.S.C. § 2255(b) (2006). In short, the retained "legal disability" language in § 2255(b) of the 2006 statute would be entirely redundant were it construed to do implicitly what the law elsewhere did expressly. In these circumstances, the traditional rules against surplusage and redundancy apply with double force. See, e.g., Duncan v. =, 533 U.S. 167, 174
+
+<sup>4</sup>Similarly, the official summary prepared by the Congressional Research Service ("CRS") explained that Masha's Law "[r]evises provisions allowing victims of certain sex-related crimes to seek civil remedies to: (I) allow adults as well as minors to sue for injuries; and (2) increase from \$50,000 to SI 50,000 the minimum level of damages." Official Summary of Pub. Law No. 109-248 (July 27, 2006), as reprinted at http://thomas.Ioc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?dI 09:HR04472: ®®@L&summ2=m& (emphasis added) (last visited May 10, 2009). Courts have long consulted official CRS summaries to assess legislative intent, see, e.g., Rettig v. Pension Ben. Guar. Corp. 744 F.2d 133, 145 & n.7 (D.C. Ur. 1984); DIRECTV Inc. v. Cianarella, No. Civ.A 03-2384, 2005 WL 1252261 at \*7 (D.N.J. May 24, 2005); Clohessy v. St. Francis Hosp. & Healthcare No. 98-C-4818, 1999 WL 46898 \*2-.3 (N.D. 111. Jan. 28, 1999), and there is good reason to do so. By design, CRS summaries are intended to "objectively describe[] the measure's ... effect upon ... current law" so that Congress can make informed judgments about the impact of proposed bills. See The Library of Congress, About CRS Summary, available at (last visited May 10, 2009).
+
+Case No. 08-CV-80232-Marra-M
+
+Page 27
+
+(2001). The "legal disability" language in § 2255(b) should be interpreted to reference classic legal disabilities like insanity, mental disability, or imprisonment—not age.
+
+Indeed, that is precisely how Congress typically uses the term "legal disability": most federal statutes that use the term make clear that it doesn't include age. See, e.g., 25 U.S.C. § 590c ("A share or interest payable to enrollees less than eighteen years of age or under legal disability shall be paid ....") (emphasis added); id. § 783 ("Funds payable under sections 781 to 785 of this title to minors or to persons under legal disability shall be paid....") (emphasis added); Id. § 1128 ("Sums payable to enrollees ... who are less than eighteen years of age or who are under a legal disability shall be paid....") (emphasis added); id. § 1253 ("Sums payable ... to enrollees ... who are less than eighteen years of age or who are under a legal disability shall be paid....") (emphasis added); id. § 1273 (same); id. § 1283 (same); id. § 1295 (same); id. § 1300a-3 (same); id. § 1300c-3 (same); id. § 1300d-7 (same); see also 38 U.S.C. § 3501.
+
+Needless to say, Congress would not have had to address age expressly in any of these statutes if the term "legal disability" necessarily included one's status as a minor; instead, Congress's mere use of the term "legal disability" already would account for a would-be plaintiff's minority status. Given the rule "against reading a text in a way that makes part of it redundant," Nat'l Ass'n of Home Builders v. Defenders of Wildlife, 551 U.S. 644 (2007) (citing TRW Inc. v. Andrews, 534 U.S. 19, 31 (2001)), and the canon that "where words are employed in a statute which had at the time a well-known meaning ... in the law of this country, they are presumed to have been used in that sense," Standard Oil Co. v. United States, 221 U.S. 1, 59 (1911), § 2255's reference to "legal disability" can only be interpreted as a reference to classic disabilities like insanity or
+
+Case No. 08-CV-80232-Marra-M
+
+Page 28
+
+mental incapacity, but not age.
+
+Accordingly, Defendant is entitled to summary judgment determining that the applicable version of §2255 allows for a minor to pursue the remedy thereunder. JD3 was 20 years old at the time she instituted this action, no longer a minor.
+
+#### Conclusion
+
+Thus, under the undisputed material facts and applicable law, Defendant is entitled to the entry of summary judgment determining that (1) the version of 18 U.S.C. §2255, effective 1999 to Jul. 26, 2006, the period of time during which EPSTEIN's alleged conduct occurred, applies to Plaintiff's claim brought pursuant to §2255; (2) JD3's own testimony establishes that EPSTEIN never used a facility or means of interstate commerce to knowingly persuade, induce, entice, or coerce her to engage in any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense, or attempting to do so. 18 U.S.C. §2422(b). Her testimony and the allegations of the complaint also show that EPSTEIN never traveled interstate with the specific intent of engaging in sexual activity with her. 18 U.S.C. 2423(b) and (e). Under the undisputed material facts, JD3 cannot show a violation of the enumerated predicate acts on which she relies, in order to prove her claim pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §2255; thus, an essential element of her §2255 cannot be established, entitling Defendant to the entry of summary judgment on Count III; and (3) the version of 18 U.S.C. § 2255 in effect when the predicate acts allegedly were committed allow only "minors" to file suit;
+
+WHEREFORE, Defendant requests that this Court enter the summary judgments sought herein. Defendant further requests an award of his attorney's fees and costs in defending this claim.
+
+Case No. 08-CV-80232-Marra-M
+
+Page 29
+
+By: Is/ Robert D. Critton, Jr. ROBERT D. CIUTTON, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar No. 224162
+
+I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record identified on the following service list in the manner specified via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF on this 7th day of May, 2010:
+
+Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A. 18205 Biscayne Boulevard Suite 2218 Miami, FL 33160 305-931-2200 Fax: 305-931-0877 ssm@sexabuseattomey.com ahorowitz@sexabuseattomey.com Counsel for Plaintiff
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 561-659-8300 Fax: 561-835-8691 jagesqabellsouth.net Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+By: /s/ Robert D. Critton, Jr. ROBERT D. CR1TTON, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar No. 224162 rcritabc1claw.com MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 mpike@bciclaw.com BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN
+
+Case No. 08-CV-80232-Marra
+
+Page 30
+
+303 Banyan Blvd., Suite 400
+
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+
+561/842-2820 Phone
+
+561/515-3148 Fax
+
+(Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein)
+
+# 1 18 USCA §2255 (effective 1999 to Jul. 26, 20061
+
+#### PART I-CRIMES CHAPTER 110--SEXUAL EXPLOITATION AND OTHER ABUSE OF CHILDREN
+
+# § 2255. Civil remedy for personal injuries
+
+(a) Any minor who is a victim of a violation of section 2241(c) 2242 2243, 2251, 2251A 2252, 2252A, 2260 2421, 2422 or 2423 of this title and who suffers personal injury as a result of such violation may sue in any appropriate United States District Court and shall recover the actual damages such minor sustains and the cost of the suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee. Any minor as described in the preceding sentence shall be deemed to have sustained damages of no less than \$50,000 in value.
+
+(b) Any action commenced under this section shall be barred unless the complaint is filed within six years after the right of action first accrues or in the case of a person under a legal disability, not later than three years after the disability.
+
+### CREDIT(S)
+
+(Added Pub.L. 99-500, Title I, § 101(b) Mile VII, § 703(a)], Oct. 18, 1986, 100 Stat. 1783-75, and amended Pub.L. 99-591. Title I. § 101(b) (Title VII, § 703(a)], Oct. 30, 1986, 100 Stat. 3341-75; Pub.L. 105-314. Title VI, § 605 Oct. 30, 1998, 112 Stat. 2984.)
+
+# 18 U.S.C. §2255, as amended 2006
+
+Effective July 27, 2006
+
+#### PART I--CRIMES CHAPTER 110-SEXUAL EXPLOITATION AND OTHER ABUSE OF CHILDREN
+
+### § 2255. Civil remedy for personal injuries
+
+(a) In general.—Any person who, while a minor, was a victim of a violation of section 2241(c), 2242 2243 2251 2251A, 2252 2252A 2260 2421 2422 or 2423 of this title and who suffers personal injury as a result of such violation, regardless of whether the injury occurred while such person was a minor, may sue in any appropriate United States District Court and shall
+
+Case No. 08-CV-80232-Marra-M
+
+Page 31
+
+recover the actual damages such person sustains and the cost of the suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee. Any person as described in the preceding sentence shall be deemed to have sustained damages of no less than \$150,000 in value.
+
+(b) Statute of limitations.--Any action commenced under this section shall be barred unless the complaint is filed within six years after the right of action first accrues or in the case of a person under a legal disability, not later than three years after the disability.
+
+CREDIT(S)
+
+(Added Pub.L. 99-500, Title I, § 101(b) [Title VII, § 703(a)), Oct. 18, 1986, 100 Stat. 1783-75, and amended Pub.L. 99-591, Title I, § 101(b) [Title VII, § 703(a)], Oct. 30, 1986, 100 Stat. 3341-75; Pub.L. 105-314, Title VI, 4 605, Oct. 30, 1998, 112 Stat. 2984; Pub. L. 109-248, Title VII, 4 707(b). (el July 27, 2006, 120 Stat. 650.)
+
+•
+
+# <sup>2</sup>CHAPTER 117-TRANSPORTATION FOR ILLEGAL SEXUAL ACTIVITY AND RELATED CRIMES
+
+Current through P.L. 107-377 (End) approved 12-19-02
+
+§ 2422. Coercion and enticement
+
+(a) Whoever knowingly persuades, induces, entices, or coerces any individual to travel in interstate or foreign commerce, or in any Territory or Possession of the United States, to engage in prostitution, or in any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense, or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both.
+
+(b) Whoever, using the mail or any facility or means of interstate or foreign commerce, or within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States knowingly persuades, induces, entices, or coerces any individual who has not attained the age of 18 years, to engage in prostitution or any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense, or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 15 years, or both.
+
+As amended, Apr. 30, 2003. (In effect during 2004 — 2005).
+
+§ 2422. Coercion and enticement
+
+(a) Whoever knowingly persuades, induces, entices, or coerces any individual to travel in interstate or foreign commerce, or in any Territory or Possession of the United States, to engage in prostitution, or in any sexual activity for which any
+
+Case No. 08-CV-80232-Marra
+
+Page 32
+
+person can be charged with a criminal offense, or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.
+
+(b) Whoever, using the mail or any facility or means of interstate or foreign commerce, or within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States knowingly persuades, induces, entices, or coerces any individual who has not attained the age of 18 years, to engage in prostitution or any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense, or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title and imprisoned not less than 5 years and not more than 30 years.
+
+Note: The amendment to the statute increased punishment that could be imposed for a violation thereof.
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740276/EFTA02740276.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740276/EFTA02740276.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7bcc6b11eeb8daa7e1849979a1f0c4e5a7f91151
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740276/EFTA02740276.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,1652 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740276.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 32,
+  "chars": 63949,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 14.02,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            199.512,
+            67.861572265625
+          ],
+          [
+            413.2564392089844,
+            67.861572265625
+          ],
+          [
+            413.2564392089844,
+            95.60302734375
+          ],
+          [
+            199.512,
+            95.60302734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, \nINCLUDING SUPPORTING MEMORANDUM OF LAW",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            121.78800000000001,
+            289.98
+          ],
+          [
+            493.99176025390625,
+            289.98
+          ],
+          [
+            493.99176025390625,
+            319.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            121.78800000000001,
+            319.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Introduction",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            274.176,
+            635.85
+          ],
+          [
+            340.2637023925781,
+            635.85
+          ],
+          [
+            340.2637023925781,
+            649.8630218505859
+          ],
+          [
+            274.176,
+            649.8630218505859
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Statement of Material Facts in Support of Summary Judgment, Loc.Gen.Rule 7.5 \nStatement of the Case",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            114.44400000000002,
+            532.1700000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            503.9842224121094,
+            532.1700000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            503.9842224121094,
+            559.8630218505859
+          ],
+          [
+            114.44400000000002,
+            559.8630218505859
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Summary Judgment Standard",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            233.17200000000003,
+            334.53
+          ],
+          [
+            382.6983337402344,
+            334.53
+          ],
+          [
+            382.6983337402344,
+            351.7330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            233.17200000000003,
+            351.7330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Discussion of Law as Applied to Undisputed Material Facts Showing \nthat EPSTEIN Is Entitled to Summary Judgment as a Matter of Law.",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            127.90799999999999,
+            142.56
+          ],
+          [
+            490.4015197753906,
+            142.56
+          ],
+          [
+            490.4015197753906,
+            171.7230224609375
+          ],
+          [
+            127.90799999999999,
+            171.7230224609375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "PART I--CRIMES",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            110.16,
+            261.63
+          ],
+          [
+            199.83714294433594,
+            261.63
+          ],
+          [
+            199.83714294433594,
+            276.7230224609375
+          ],
+          [
+            110.16,
+            276.7230224609375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CHAPTER 110--SEXUAL EXPLOITATION AND OTHER ABUSE OF CHILDREN \n\u00a7 2255. Civil remedy for personal injuries",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            110.16,
+            272.97
+          ],
+          [
+            500.3843994140625,
+            272.97
+          ],
+          [
+            500.3843994140625,
+            301.85302734375
+          ],
+          [
+            110.16,
+            301.85302734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "II. Defendant is entitled to summary judgment on Count ill, as under the \nundisputed material facts, Plaintiff has failed to and can not show a violation of \na requisite predicate act to sustain a claim pursuant to 18 U.S.C.",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 16,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            116.892,
+            637.4288940429688
+          ],
+          [
+            499.6314392089844,
+            637.4288940429688
+          ],
+          [
+            499.6314392089844,
+            678.4335174560547
+          ],
+          [
+            116.892,
+            678.4335174560547
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "PART I--CRIMES",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 17,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            110.77199999999999,
+            583.2
+          ],
+          [
+            207.46664428710938,
+            583.2
+          ],
+          [
+            207.46664428710938,
+            599.2330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            110.77199999999999,
+            599.2330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CHAPTER 110--SEXUAL EXPLOITATION AND OTHER ABUSE OF \nCHILDREN",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 17,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            110.77199999999999,
+            596.16
+          ],
+          [
+            470.3838806152344,
+            596.16
+          ],
+          [
+            470.3838806152344,
+            626.9830169677734
+          ],
+          [
+            110.77199999999999,
+            626.9830169677734
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "III. The Version of 18 U.S.C. \u00a7 2255 In Effect When The Predicate Acts \nAllegedly Were Committed Allowed Only \"Minors\" To File Suit.",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 21,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            116.892,
+            528.1200000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            498.10137939453125,
+            528.1200000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            498.10137939453125,
+            555.7330169677734
+          ],
+          [
+            116.892,
+            555.7330169677734
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Conclusion",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 27,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            278.46000000000004,
+            197.64
+          ],
+          [
+            336.10980224609375,
+            197.64
+          ],
+          [
+            336.10980224609375,
+            211.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            278.46000000000004,
+            211.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "1 18 USCA \u00a72255 (effective 1999 to Jul. 26, 20061",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 29,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            168.912,
+            196.02
+          ],
+          [
+            450.5846862792969,
+            196.02
+          ],
+          [
+            450.5846862792969,
+            211.447021484375
+          ],
+          [
+            168.912,
+            211.447021484375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "PART I-CRIMES \nCHAPTER 110--SEXUAL EXPLOITATION AND OTHER ABUSE OF CHILDREN",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 29,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            105.26399999999998,
+            217.07999999999998
+          ],
+          [
+            510.6676330566406,
+            217.07999999999998
+          ],
+          [
+            510.6676330566406,
+            243.68701171875
+          ],
+          [
+            105.26399999999998,
+            243.68701171875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "\u00a7 2255. Civil remedy for personal injuries",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 29,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            124.848,
+            255.14999999999998
+          ],
+          [
+            345.2808532714844,
+            255.14999999999998
+          ],
+          [
+            345.2808532714844,
+            269.947021484375
+          ],
+          [
+            124.848,
+            269.947021484375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CREDIT(S)",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 29,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            124.848,
+            458.46
+          ],
+          [
+            186.6719207763672,
+            458.46
+          ],
+          [
+            186.6719207763672,
+            472.8170471191406
+          ],
+          [
+            124.848,
+            472.8170471191406
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "18 U.S.C. \u00a72255, as amended 2006",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 29,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            545.94
+          ],
+          [
+            408.12530517578125,
+            545.94
+          ],
+          [
+            408.12530517578125,
+            561.3170471191406
+          ],
+          [
+            206.24400000000003,
+            561.3170471191406
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "PART I--CRIMES \nCHAPTER 110-SEXUAL EXPLOITATION AND OTHER ABUSE OF CHILDREN",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 29,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            105.26399999999998,
+            587.25
+          ],
+          [
+            510.2983703613281,
+            587.25
+          ],
+          [
+            510.2983703613281,
+            614.1870422363281
+          ],
+          [
+            105.26399999999998,
+            614.1870422363281
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "\u00a7 2255. Civil remedy for personal injuries",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 29,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            116.892,
+            618.84
+          ],
+          [
+            337.368408203125,
+            618.84
+          ],
+          [
+            337.368408203125,
+            633.3170471191406
+          ],
+          [
+            116.892,
+            633.3170471191406
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "2CHAPTER 117-TRANSPORTATION FOR ILLEGAL SEXUAL ACTIVITY AND \nRELATED CRIMES",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 30,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            104.652,
+            352.35
+          ],
+          [
+            512.3193969726562,
+            352.35
+          ],
+          [
+            512.3193969726562,
+            382.0670471191406
+          ],
+          [
+            104.652,
+            382.0670471191406
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            9
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            56
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            73
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            35
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            63
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            32
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            69
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            33
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            9
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            73
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            34
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            9
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            69
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            30
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            9
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            18
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 9,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            80
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            39
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 10,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            77
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            31
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            9
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 11,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            62
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 12,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            61
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 13,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            76
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            30
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 14,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            66
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            32
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 15,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            72
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            34
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 16,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            60
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 17,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            63
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            31
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 18,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            62
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            29
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 19,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            59
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 20,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            65
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 21,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            57
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 22,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            65
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            30
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 23,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            72
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            31
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 24,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            67
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            33
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            9
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 25,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            83
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            36
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 26,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            61
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 27,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            56
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 28,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            90
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            43
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            9
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 29,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            95
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            41
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            13
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 30,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            86
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            40
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            15
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 31,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            32
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            16
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02740276"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740308/EFTA02740308.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740308/EFTA02740308.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..99f0fb83dadca3134fd9dc70ecf35467559ea71a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740308/EFTA02740308.md
@@ -0,0 +1,121 @@
+#### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 2,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+Related Cases:
+
+08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80993, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092,
+
+## PLAINTIFFS JANE DOES 2-8' MEMORANDUM IN RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S RULE 4 APPEAL
+
+Plaintiffs, Jane Does 2-8 ("Plaintiffs"), by and through undersigned counsel, file this Memorandum in Response to Defendant's Rule 4 Appeal of the Magistrate Judge's Orders (DE 480 and DE 513) directing Defendant to produce his income tax returns, as follows:
+
+# Introduction
+
+Defendant appeals the Magistrate Judge's Orders (DE 480 and DE 513) compelling Defendant to produce income tax returns and related forms and schedules. He fails, however, to demonstrate that the Magistrate Judge's decision as to tax returns is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. The applicable case law establishes that the tax returns are not protected from discovery by the Fifth Amendment privilege under the act of production doctrine, or alternatively, that they fall within the "required records" exception to the Fifth Amendment privilege.
+
+The tax returns are indisputably relevant in these cases, particularly as to Plaintiffs claims for punitive damages, and given the Defendant's invocation of the Fifth Amendment in
+
+blanket fashion to all requests for net worth discovery, there is a compelling need for this discovery. Even if Plaintiffs could not demonstrate a compelling need for the tax returns in discovery, under applicable Eleventh Circuit precedent and reported cases in this District, Plaintiffs would be entitled to this discovery under the broad relevance standard of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b). Finally, there is no basis to delay this discovery, as the tax returns are relevant to punitive damages, which is an important, current issue in these cases. For the reasons set forth herein, Plaintiff's request that the Magistrate Judge's Orders as to Defendant's tax returns be affirmed and that Defendant be ordered to produce the tax return discovery requested by Plaintiffs.
+
+## Amount
+
+## I. DEFENDANT HAS BURDEN TO SHOW THAT MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S ORDER IS CLEARLY ERRONEOUS OR CONTRARY TO LAW
+
+In seeking reversal of the Magistrate Judge's Order as to discovery of tax returns, it is the Defendant's burden to show that the order is "clearly erroneous or contrary to law". 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1). Absent such a showing, the Magistrate Judge's decision "shall not be disturbed." Emmisive Energy Corp. v. Novatac, Inc., 2009 WL 2834841 •1 (S.D. Fla. 2009). In the instant appeal, Defendant has not shown that the Magistrate Judge's Order to produce tax returns is clearly erroneous or contrary to law.
+
+## II. THE ACT OF PRODUCTION OF TAX RETURNS IS NOT PROTECTED BY THE FIFTH AMENDMENT PRIVILEGE
+
+The Plaintiffs served the following document request in discovery, to which Defendant asserted the Fifth Amendment privilege:
+
+Request No. 1: All Federal and State income tax returns, including all W-2 forms, 1099 forms and schedules, for tax years 2003-2008.
+
+The Magistrate Judge rejected the Defendant's privilege assertion as to tax returns. (De 480, pp. 8-9). In so holding, the Magistrate Judge applied the act of production doctrine set forth in
+
+Fisher v. United States 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976) and United States v. Hubbell, 530 U.S. 27, 35- 36 (2000). As noted by the Magistrate Judge, "Defendant cannot reasonably and in good faith argue that in producing these documents to Plaintiff he will somehow be incriminating himself." (Order, p. 9). Yet, Defendant argues just that. In Hubbell the Supreme Court made express reference to tax returns in discussing documents that cannot be protected by the Fifth Amendment privilege under the act of production doctrine:
+
+> [T]he fact that incriminating evidence may be the byproduct of obedience to a regulatory requirement, such as filing an income tax return, maintaining required records, or reporting an accident, does not clothe such required conduct with the testimonial privilege.
+
+120 U.S. at 2043, 530 U.S. at 35 (footnotes omitted) (emphasis supplied). Accord United States v. Hammes 3 F.3d 1081, 1083 (7th Cir. 1993) ("[w]e reject [defendant's] compulsory selfincrimination claim because the government may use voluntarily filed tax returns against a defendant without violating the Fifth Amendment"). See also Garner v. United States, 96 S.Ct. 1178, 424 U.S. 648 (1976) (holding that disclosures in tax returns are not compelled incriminations and may be used as evidence in criminal prosecution); Ebay, Inc. v. Digital Point Solutions. Inc. 2010 WL 147967 \*8 (N.D. Cal. 2010) (holding that a person cannot incriminate himself by turning over a document already in the government's possession); Federal Savings and Loan Ins. Corp. v. Hardee, 686 F. Supp 885 (N.D. Fla. 1988) (holding that personal income tax returns and supporting schedules are not protected by the "act of production" doctrine under Fisher).
+
+As an alternative to finding that the Fifth Amendment privilege does not apply because the act of producing documents is not testimonial and communicative, courts have invoked the "required records" exception to the act of production doctrine. See Federal Saving & Loan Ins. Corp. v. Rodrigues 717 F. Supp. 1424, 1427 (N.D. Cal 1988) ("required records" exception is a distinct basis to deny Fifth Amendment privilege alternative to the "foregone conclusion" rationale under Fisher). The "required records" exception defeats the Fifth Amendment privilege where: "(1) because of the public aspect of the required records the individual admits little of significance by their production; and (2) by doing business in an area where the government requires record keeping, an individual may be deemed to have waived the Fifth Amendment privilege as to the production of those records." In re Grand Jury Subpoena 21 F.3d 226, 229 (8th Cir. 1994).
+
+Defendant contends that the "required records" exception does not apply to tax returns because they cannot be accessed by the public. This is wrong, however, as the "required records" exception requires only that there be "public aspects" to the documents at issue. Id. Numerous courts that have addressed this precise issue have found that tax returns have "public aspects". See Rodrigues, 717 F. Supp. at 1426-27 (citing cases); accord Doe v. United States, 711 F.2d 1187, 1191 (2d Cir. 1983).1 Accordingly, the "required records" exception applies to the production of tax returns. In Rodrigues, the Court denied the Fifth Amendment privilege for the act of producing tax returns under the "required records" exception, noting that "records filed with a public body pursuant to a valid regulatory scheme have been held to have public aspects." Id. at 1427. Accordingly, the fact that federal tax returns cannot be accessed by the general public does not aid the Defendant. Accord Resolution Trust Corp. v. =, 794 F. Supp. 1, 3 (D.D.C. 1992).
+
+Thus, there are two alternative grounds for holding that Defendant's assertion of the Fifth Amendment privilege to production of tax returns is invalid: (1) the tax returns are in the
+
+<sup>&#</sup>x27; Defendant further appears to argue that the "required records" exception should be limited to "highly regulated business (e.g., physicians)", citing In re Dr. John Doe 97 F.R.D. 640, 641-643 (S.D.N.Y. 1982). In Dr. John Doe, however, the Court held contrary to Defendant's assertion and consistent with the case law cited herein stating, "[w]e agree that some of these records (e.g. W-2 and other tax forms) may indeed fall within the required records exception." Id. at 644 (ordering that Dr. Doe comply with subpoena for W-2 forms).
+
+possession of the government, their existence is a foregone conclusion, and there is no risk of "implicit authentication" by Defendant's production of these documents; or (2) tax returns fall within the "required records" exception to the act of production doctrine, and are thus not protected by the Fifth Amendment. Under either of these grounds, the Defendant's tax returns are not privileged and must be produced in discovery.
+
+## H. THERE IS NO HEIGHTENED BURDEN FOR DISCOVERY OF TAX RETURNS
+
+Defendant asserts that there is a heightened burden on a party seeking discovery of tax returns, requiring that party to show not only relevance, but also that "a compelling need for the tax returns exists because the information contained therein is not otherwise available." (Appeal, p. 24). However, in the Eleventh Circuit this heightened burden has been rejected. "[T]he Eleventh Circuit does not require a showing of compelling need before tax information may be obtained by a party in discovery." Bellosa v. Universal Tile Restoration, Inc., 2008 WL 2620735 (S.D. Fla. 2008) (citing Maddow v. Procter & Gamble Co. 107 F.3d 846 (11th Cir. 1997)); accord U.S. v. Certain Real Property 444 F.Supp. 2d 1258 (S.D.Fla. 2006)• Platypus Wear. Inc. v. Clarke Modet & Co., 2008 W.L. 728540 (S.D. Ha. 2008); Preferred Care Partners Holding Corp. v. Humana. Inc. 2008 WL 4500258 (S.D. Ha. 2008); Ruskin Co. v. Greenheck Fan Corp. 2009 WL 383349 (S.D. Fla. 2009). Significantly, in both Preferred Care and Ruskin the Court affirmed the decision of a Magistrate Judge rejecting a higher standard for production of tax returns, holding that, despite an arguable split of authority, <sup>2</sup>the Magistrate Judge's decision was not "contrary to law." Id. Likewise, the Magistrate Judge's decision in this case compelling
+
+Defendant relies upon Pendlebury v. Starbucks Coffee Co., 2008 WL 2105024 (S.D. Fla. 2005) and Dunkin Donuts, Inc. v. Mary's Donuts, Inc. 2001 WL 34079319 (S.D. Fla. 2001), in which the Court applied the higher standard. These cases do not consider the Eleventh Circuit's opinion in Maddow and the federal judges in this District over the past five years since Pendlebury have consistently rejected the "compelling need" standard for production of tax returns. See cases cited above.
+
+production of tax returns is consistent with authority in this District and the Eleventh Circuit, and thus should be affirmed.
+
+#### III. EVIDENCE OF DEFENDANT'S FINANCIAL STATUS AND HISTORY IS RELEVANT TO PUNITIVE DAMAGES, AMONG OTHER ISSUES
+
+Defendant does not go so far as to contend that the discovery of his tax returns is not relevant under Fed.R.Civ.P. 26. Defendant only argues that the Magistrate Judge did not address the relevancy standard in her Order. (Appeal, p. 25). As a result, Defendant does nothing to show that the Magistrate Judge's Order as to tax returns is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. In any event, it is abundantly clear that Defendant's financial status and history are relevant to punitive damages, among other issues in these cases, and in this regard the Defendant's tax returns are pertinent and discoverable. Tennant v. Charlton 377 So.2d 1169 (Ha. 1979) (holding that party may obtain tax returns for purposes of net worth discovery on issue of punitive damages). See also State v. O'Malley, 53 S.W. 3d 623 (Mo. App. 2001) ("[i]t is well settled that when a plaintiff seeks punitive damages against a defendant, evidence of the defendant's financial status is both relevant and admissible"); Interstate Narrow Fabrics, Inc. v. Century USA. Inc 2004 WL 444570 (M.D. N.C. 2004) (holding that tax returns are relevant to the jury's determination of the amount of punitive damages to award); E.J. Lavino & Co. v. Universal Health Services, Inc., 1991 WL 275767 (ED. Pa. 1991) ("[m]ost courts that have considered this issue have held that a plaintiff seeking punitive damages may discovery information pertaining to a defendant's net worth").
+
+Defendant further argues that he should not have to produce his tax returns until "it becomes apparent" that "punitive damages will be an issue." (Appeal, p. 26). This argument ignores Florida law on punitive damages. It is well established that "punitive damages are always recoverable in intentional tort cases where malice is one of the essential elements of the
+
+tort." Ciamar Marcay. Inc. v. Monteiro Da Costa 508 So.2d 1282 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987) (emphasis supplied). "In Florida it is clear that an act of intentional assault and battery committed without legal justification supplies proof of malice." Joab, Inc. v. Thrall, 245 So.2d 291 (Ha. 3d DCA 1971). Therefore, it is clear in this intentional tort case that punitive damages are an issue. As this Court knows, Defendant Epstein is alleged to have perpetrated a plan and scheme to sexually molest dozens of underage teenage girls.;
+
+Even assuming that the "compelling need" standard were applicable for discovery of tax returns, clearly in this case there is a compelling need. Defendant has provided no net worth discovery, asserting a blanket Fifth Amendment privilege.<sup>4</sup>Defendant nonetheless contends that there exists an "alternative" - not to discovery of the necessary information, but through his offer to "stipulate" to a net worth in the nine figures. Of course, a stipulation requires the consent of the parties and there is no agreement in this case on the Defendant's net worth. Defendant cannot unilaterally by fiat claim a certain net worth for purposes of trial? The law is well established that a jury may determine punitive damages "by exacting from [the defendant's] pocketbook a sum of money which, according to his financial ability, will hurt, but not
+
+<sup>3</sup>Defendant's reliance on Gallina v. Commerce and Industry Ins. 2008 WL 3895918 (M.D. Ha. 2008) is misplaced. Gallina is an insurance bad faith case and does not involve a claim of punitive damages against an intentional tortfeasor. Moreover, in the present case it would make no sense to have a different "stage" for punitive damages discovery or trial.
+
+<sup>4</sup> "[T]he burden to identify an alternative source of the information lies with the resisting party." Interstate Narrow Fabrics, 2004 WL 444570 at \*2. Here, Epstein's blanket Fifth Amendment privilege assertion to all net worth discovery makes it clear that there is a compelling need for any net worth discovery not protected by the Fifth Amendment privilege.
+
+<sup>3</sup> Defendant relies upon Myers v. Central Florida Investment, Inc., 592 F.3d 1201 (11th Cir. 2010) for its "stipulation" argument. In Myers, however, the district court heard testimony regarding each of the defendant's net worth. There was no unilateral statement of net worth in Myers as Defendant wishes to create in the instant case. To the extent that Defendant relies upon the Court's holding in Myers regarding the reasonableness of the trial court's award of punitive damages, the issue of reasonableness is determined by the particular facts and circumstances of the case and the discussion in Myers of this issue has no relevance here. Id.
+
+bankrupt." Joab, Inc. v. Thrall 245 So.2d 291 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971) (emphasis supplied). Plaintiffs are therefore entitled to discovery on the Defendant's real net worth so that the jury will be in a position to make an award that "will hurt". In any event, it seems beyond dispute that Defendant's tax returns are relevant and discoverable, either under a straight relevance test under Fed.R.Civ.P. 26 or a heightened "compelling need" standard.
+
+# Conclusion
+
+Based on the foregoing, the Magistrate Judge's Orders as to Defendant's production of tax returns in response to Plaintiffs' document request no. 1 are not clearly erroneous and not contrary to law. As a result, the Magistrate Judge's Orders as to production of tax returns should be affirmed. Plaintiffs respectfully request that the documents responsive to Plaintiffs' document request no. 1 be ordered to be produced forthwith.
+
+Dated: May 28, 2010. Respectfully submitted,
+
+By: s/ Stuart S. Mermelstein Stuart S. Mermelstein (FL Bar No. 947245) ssm@sexabuseattorney.com Adam D. Horowitz (FL Bar No. 376980) ahorowitz@sexabuseattomev.com MERMELSTEIN & HOROWITZ, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiffs 18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160 Tel: (305) 931-2200 Fax: (305) 931-0877
+
+## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
+
+I hereby certify that on May 28, 2010, 1 electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day to all parties on the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those parties who are not authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing.
+
+/s/ Stuart S. Mermelstein
+
+#### SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. iRoldberger@agwria.com
+
+Robert D. Critton, Esq. rcritton@bc1claw.com
+
+James bedwards@rra-law.com
+
+Isidro Manuel isidrogarcia@bellsouth.net
+
+Jack jph@searcylaw.com
+
+Katherine Warthen Ezell KEzell@podhurst.com
+
+Michael James Pike MPike@bciclaw.com
+
+Paul G. Cassell cassellp@law.utah.edu
+
+Richard Horace Willits lawverwillits@aol.com
+
+Robert C. Josefsberg rjosefsberg@podhurst.com
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740308/EFTA02740308.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740308/EFTA02740308.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..680991b12ff67ea1a8e250314473b491bacdc49a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740308/EFTA02740308.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,658 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740308.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 10,
+  "chars": 17181,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.61,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            205.02,
+            76.94999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            405.95098876953125,
+            76.94999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            405.95098876953125,
+            104.9830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            205.02,
+            104.9830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "PLAINTIFFS JANE DOES 2-8' MEMORANDUM IN \nRESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S RULE 4 APPEAL",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            164.01600000000002,
+            365.31000000000006
+          ],
+          [
+            448.0298767089844,
+            365.31000000000006
+          ],
+          [
+            448.0298767089844,
+            394.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            164.01600000000002,
+            394.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Introduction",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            269.892,
+            489.23999999999995
+          ],
+          [
+            341.24761962890625,
+            489.23999999999995
+          ],
+          [
+            341.24761962890625,
+            504.7330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            269.892,
+            504.7330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Amount",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            276.624,
+            311.04
+          ],
+          [
+            336.2855529785156,
+            311.04
+          ],
+          [
+            336.2855529785156,
+            325.863037109375
+          ],
+          [
+            276.624,
+            325.863037109375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "I. DEFENDANT HAS BURDEN TO SHOW THAT MAGISTRATE \nJUDGE'S ORDER IS CLEARLY ERRONEOUS OR CONTRARY TO LAW",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            115.05599999999998,
+            337.77
+          ],
+          [
+            526.0112915039062,
+            337.77
+          ],
+          [
+            526.0112915039062,
+            366.7330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            115.05599999999998,
+            366.7330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "II. THE ACT OF PRODUCTION OF TAX RETURNS IS NOT \nPROTECTED BY THE FIFTH AMENDMENT PRIVILEGE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            129.744,
+            545.13
+          ],
+          [
+            485.680908203125,
+            545.13
+          ],
+          [
+            485.680908203125,
+            574.1030120849609
+          ],
+          [
+            129.744,
+            574.1030120849609
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "H. THERE IS NO HEIGHTENED BURDEN \nFOR DISCOVERY OF TAX RETURNS",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            176.868,
+            200.07
+          ],
+          [
+            434.8689880371094,
+            200.07
+          ],
+          [
+            434.8689880371094,
+            229.10302734375
+          ],
+          [
+            176.868,
+            229.10302734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "III. EVIDENCE OF DEFENDANT'S FINANCIAL \nSTATUS AND HISTORY IS RELEVANT TO \nPUNITIVE DAMAGES, AMONG OTHER ISSUES",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            164.62800000000001,
+            117.44999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            461.0816650390625,
+            117.44999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            461.0816650390625,
+            160.10302734375
+          ],
+          [
+            164.62800000000001,
+            160.10302734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Conclusion",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            274.788,
+            200.07
+          ],
+          [
+            337.7822265625,
+            200.07
+          ],
+          [
+            337.7822265625,
+            215.2330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            274.788,
+            215.2330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            223.38,
+            62.37
+          ],
+          [
+            388.5423889160156,
+            62.37
+          ],
+          [
+            388.5423889160156,
+            77.2330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            223.38,
+            77.2330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "SERVICE LIST \nDOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN \nUnited States District Court, Southern District of Florida",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 9,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            156.06,
+            62.37
+          ],
+          [
+            454.7546691894531,
+            62.37
+          ],
+          [
+            454.7546691894531,
+            104.9830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            156.06,
+            104.9830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            55
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            11
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            59
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            29
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            74
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            29
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            75
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            30
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            80
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            30
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            66
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            92
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            33
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            21
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 9,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02740308"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740318/EFTA02740318.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740318/EFTA02740318.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7091bfec7d0145e0059a819db9acef2a0ce28b79
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740318/EFTA02740318.md
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA-
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+v.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL
+
+Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, in the above-styled cases hereby files his Notice of Withdrawal. Plaintiff, JANE DOE 3 is in agreement with this Notice. In support thereof:
+
+- 1. The parties have reached a settlement in this matter.
+- 2. As a result, the following docket entry is hereby moot.
+  - a. DE 141, Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment
+
+By: /s✓ Robert D. Critton, Jr. Robert D. Critton, Jr. Florida Bar No. 224162
+
+Jane Doe No. 3 v. Epstein Page 2
+
+## Certificate of Service
+
+I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record identified on the following Service List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on this 11th day of June, 2010:
+
+Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. Adam D. Horowitz, Esq. Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A. 18205 Biscayne Boulevard Suite 2218 Miami, FL 33160 305-931-2200 Fax: 305-931-0877 ssmgsexabuseattomey.com ahorowitz©.sexabuseattomey.com Counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe #3
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 561-659-8300 Fax: 561-835-8691 iaaeso®bellsouth.net Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+By: /s/ Robert D. Critton, Jr. ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar No. 224162 rcrit@bciclaw.com MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 mpike@bciclaw.com BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN 515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561/842-2820 Phone 561/515-3148 Fax (Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein)
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740318/EFTA02740318.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740318/EFTA02740318.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..31d11d62fcd117bfea0028a9ec51b71e80bf42ed
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740318/EFTA02740318.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,178 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740318.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 2,
+  "chars": 1814,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 0.74,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            202.572,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            417.7664489746094,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            417.7664489746094,
+            116.60302734375
+          ],
+          [
+            202.572,
+            116.60302734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            228.276,
+            306.99
+          ],
+          [
+            394.4425964355469,
+            306.99
+          ],
+          [
+            394.4425964355469,
+            323.2330627441406
+          ],
+          [
+            228.276,
+            323.2330627441406
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Certificate of Service",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            269.892,
+            108.53999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            384.45050048828125,
+            108.53999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            384.45050048828125,
+            123.7330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            269.892,
+            123.7330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            38
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            19
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            9
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            87
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            43
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02740318"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740320/EFTA02740320.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740320/EFTA02740320.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..71d25101fac02ac7d6bb1b36b9fedc56aab48e1d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740320/EFTA02740320.md
@@ -0,0 +1,363 @@
+# UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CIV-80119-MARIS
+
+JANE DOE NO. 2,
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+Related cases:
+
+08-80232, 08-08380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80993, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092
+
+FILED by Vi JUN 1 4 2010 STEVEN M. Lon+Drvr CLERK U.S. 01ST cy-S.D. OF FLA. - D.C.
+
+# Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's Emergency Motion For Protective Order, Motion to Ouash and Motion for Attorneys' Fees, With Incorporated Memorandum Of Law
+
+Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, (hereinafter "EPSTEIN") by and through his undersigned attorneys, hereby files his Emergency Motion For Protective Order, Motion to Quash and Motion for Attorneys' fees and Costs, With Incorporated Memorandum Of Law. In support, Defendant states as follows:
+
+1. As this Court is well aware, these cases have been consolidated for discovery. However, on April 1, 2010, Plaintiff's counsel, Spencer Kuvin, filed C.L. v. Epstein, Case No. 10-80447-cv-Marra\_, and that case has not been consolidated with the other related cases for purposes of discovery.
+
+2. On April 20, 2010, Mr. Kuvin served Maritza Milagros Vasquez with a subpoena for deposition, which is set to occur tomorrow. See Exhibit "A". However, this Notice and subpoena for deposition must be stricken/quashed as Mr. Kuvin, on behalf of his client, has failed to comply with Fed.R.Civ.P. 26 (d). That rule states, in pertinent part, that: "[a] party may not seek discovery from any source before the parties have conferred as required by Rule 26(0. . . ." Mr. Kuvin, on behalf of his client, has not complied with Rule 26(0 and, therefore, the subpoena for deposition must be stricken/quashed and <sup>a</sup> Protective Order should be entered pursuant to Rule 26(c) forbidding the deposition from occurring for non-compliance with the applicable rules. In Varo, Inc. v. Litton Systems, Inc., 129 F.R.D. 139, 141 (N.D. TX 1989), the court held that one cannot be compelled to comply with awithdrawn subpoena. Id. Likewise, the court here cannot compel Maritza Milagros Vasquez to attend any deposition when the subpoena itself is invalid, especially when it will require those involved in these matters to incur substantial attorneys' fees.
+
+3. Next, Mr. Brad , counsel for Jane Doe, cross-noticed Maritza Milagros Vasquez's deposition in Jane Doe (#08-80893 - Exhibit "B"), which matter is already set for trial in July 2010. Discovery concluded on May 31, 2010 see DE 531). Accordingly, the cross notice served by Jane Doe must be stricken/quashed and <sup>a</sup> protective order entered because the subpoena itself in invalid due to C.L.'s counsel's failure to comply with Rule 26(d) and discovery in Jane Doe (80893) has concluded.
+
+#### Rule 7.1 Certification
+
+<sup>I</sup>hereby certify that counsel for the respective parties communicated by e-mail in <sup>a</sup> good faith effort to resolve the issues set forth above prior to the filing of this Motion and none of the issues were resolved.
+
+WHEREFORE, Defendant requests that this Court enter an order granting Defendant's motion for protective order and motion to quash. Defendant further requests that this Court award his attorney's fees and costs associated with this motion, in accordance with Rule 37, Fed.R.Civ.P. and applicable Local Rules and specifically:
+
+- a. Quash CL's subpoena attached as Exhibit "A";
+
+- b. Quash and/or strike Jane Doe's cross notice as to Exhibit "A" because Exhibit "A" is invalid and discovery has concluded in Jane Doe;
+- c. Award attorneys to Defendant for CL and Jane Doe's noncompliance with these discovery matters; and
+- d. for such other and further relief as this co d proper.
+
+By:
+
+MIC Flori 17296
+
+#### Certificate of Service
+
+<sup>I</sup>HEREBY CERTIFY that atrue copy of the foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record identified on the following Service List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on this 14th day of June. <sup>2010</sup>
+
+Respectfully submitte
+
+By:
+
+ESQ.
+
+Flo Bar No. 224162
+
+rcrit@bc1claw.com
+
+MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ.
+
+Florida Bar #617296
+
+mpike@bc1claw.com
+
+BURMAN, GIRTON, LUTHER & COLEMAN
+
+515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400
+
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+
+561/842-2820 Phone
+
+561/515-3148 Fax
+
+(Counsel for Defendant Jeffiey Epstein)
+
+#### Certificate of Service
+
+Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey E stein
+
+Case No. 08-CV-80119-
+
+Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq.
+
+Adam D. Horowitz, Esq.
+
+Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A.
+
+18205 Biscayne Boulevard
+
+Brad Esq.
+
+Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler
+
+401 East Las Olas Boulevard
+
+Suite 1650
+
+Suite 2218
+
+Miami, FL 33160
+
+305-931-2200
+
+Fax: 305-931-0877
+
+ssm@sexabuseattomev.com
+
+ahorowitz@sexabuseattomev.com
+
+Counsel for Plaintiffs
+
+In related Cases Nos. 08-80069, 08-80119,
+
+08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80993,
+
+08-80994
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq.
+
+Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
+
+250 Australian Avenue South
+
+Suite 1400
+
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012
+
+561-659-8300
+
+Fax: 561-835-8691
+
+juesqObellsouth.net
+
+Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
+
+Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
+
+Phone: 954-522-3456
+
+Fax: 954-527-8663
+
+bedwards@sra-law.com
+
+Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No.
+
+08-80893
+
+Paul G. Cassell, Esq.
+
+Pro Hac Vice
+
+332 South 1400 E, Room 101
+
+Salt Lake City, UT 84112
+
+801-585-5202
+
+801-585-6833 Fax
+
+casselln@law.utah.edu
+
+Co-counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe
+
+Isidro M. M. Esq.
+
+SIELaw FirTn, P.A.
+
+224-Watura Street, Suite 900
+
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+
+561-832-7732
+
+561-832-7137 F
+
+isidrorrarcia@bellsouth.net
+
+Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No.
+
+08-80469
+
+AO 88A (Rev. 06/09) Subpoena to Testify at a Deposition in a Civil Action
+
+# UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
+
+for the
+
+Southern District of Florida
+
+C.L.
+
+Plaintiff
+
+v.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN
+
+Defendant
+
+)  
+)  
+)  
+)  
+)  
+)  
+)
+
+Civil Action No. 10-80447-cv-Marra [REDACTED]
+
+(If the action is pending in another district, state where:
+
+)
+
+## SUBPOENA TO TESTIFY AT A DEPOSITION IN A CIVIL ACTION
+
+To: MARITZA MILAGROS VASQUEZ, 1253 SW 21ST TERRACE, APT 21, MIAMI, FL 33145-2922
+
+Testimony: **YOU ARE COMMANDED** to appear at the time, date, and place set forth below to testify at a deposition to be taken in this civil action. If you are an organization that is *not* a party in this case, you must designate one or more officers, directors, or managing agents, or designate other persons who consent to testify on your behalf about the following matters, or those set forth in an attachment:
+
+Place: INTELLIGENT OFFICE, 701 BRICKELL AVENUE, SUITE 1550, MIAMI, FL 33131
+
+Date and Time:
+
+05/18/2010 10:00 am
+
+The deposition will be recorded by this method: VIDEOGRAPHER AND COURT REPORTER
+
+Production: You, or your representatives, must also bring with you to the deposition the following documents, electronically stored information, or objects, and permit their inspection, copying, testing, or sampling of the material:
+
+The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(c), relating to your protection as a person subject to a subpoena, and Rule 45 (d) and (e), relating to your duty to respond to this subpoena and the potential consequences of not doing so, are attached.
+
+Date: 04/08/2010
+
+CLERK OF COURT
+
+OR
+
+Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk
+
+![]()Attorney's signature
+
+The name, address, e-mail, and telephone number of the attorney representing (name of party) C.L.
+
+, who issues or requests this subpoena, are:
+
+SPENCER T. KUVIN, ESQ., LEOPOLD-KUVIN, P.A., 2925 PGA BOULEVARD, SUITE 200, PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA 33410
+
+T: 561-515-1400
+
+F: 561-515-1401
+
+"A"
+
+AO SM (Rev. 06/09) Sutooena to Testily at a Deposition in a Civil Action (Page 2)
+
+Civil Action No. 10-80447-cv-Merma
+
+## PROOF OF SERVICE
+
+(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fa R. ay. P. 45.)
+
+This subpoena for (name of individual and talc if any) was received by me on (dale)
+
+O I saved the subpoena by delivering a copy to the named individual as follows:
+
+on (date) ; or
+
+O I returned the subpoena unexecuted because:
+
+Unless the subpoena was issued on behalf of the United States, or one of its officers or agents, I have also tendered to the witness fees for one day's attendance, and the mileage allowed by law, in the amount of S
+
+My fees are \$ for travel and \$ for services, for a total of \$ 0.00
+
+Date:
+
+I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.
+
+Server's signature
+
+Printed Mn and tide
+
+Server's address
+
+Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:
+
+**UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT  
+SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA**
+
+JANE DOE,
+
+CASE NO. 08-CV-80893-CIV-MARRA/ [REDACTED]
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+Vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN, et al.
+
+Defendant.
+
+\_\_\_\_\_/
+
+**Related Cases:**
+
+08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381,  
+08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469,  
+09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092
+
+\_\_\_\_\_/
+
+**PLAINTIFF'S CROSS-NOTICE OF VIDEO DEPOSITION OF  
+MARITZA MILAGROS VASQUEZ**
+
+**PLEASE TAKE NOTICE** that plaintiff, Jane Doe, will take the video deposition by oral examination, of the persons named below, at the time, on the date, at the hour of the place indicated:
+
+| NAME                     | DATE AND TIME              | PLACE OF TAKING DEPOSITON                                                |
+|--------------------------|----------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| Maritza Milagros Vasquez | June 15, 2010 @<br>10:00AM | Intelligent Office<br>701 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1550<br>Miami, FL 33131 |
+
+upon oral examination before Videographer and a Notary Public, or any other notary public or officer authorized by law to take depositions in the State of Florida. The oral examination will continue from day to day until completed. The depositions are being
+
+"B"
+
+CASE NO: 06-CV-80119-MARRa
+
+taken for the purpose of discovery, for use at trial, or for such other purposes as are permitted under the Rules of Court.
+
+## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
+
+I HEREBY CERTIFY that a copy of the foregoing was served by e-mail on May 12, 2010 to: See attached service list.
+
+> J. JaleirssIng, "t rews Ave., Suite 2 Fistos & Lehrman, PL Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 (954) 524-2820 (954) 524-2822 fax brad@pathtojustice.com
+
+By:
+
+CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MARRia
+
+### SERVICE LIST
+
+Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein United States District Court - Southern District of Florida
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Jgoldbergereaqwpa.com
+
+Robert D. Critton, Esq. rcrittonebcIclaw.com
+
+Isidro Manual isidrogarciaebellsouth.net
+
+Jack iphesearcylaw.com •
+
+Katherine Warthen Ezell KEzell@podhurst.com
+
+Michael James Pike MPikeebcIclaw.com
+
+Paul G. Cassell cassellpelaw.utah.edu
+
+Richard Horace Willits lawyerswillitseaol.com
+
+Robert C. Josefsberg riosefsbergepodhurst.com
+
+Adam D. Horowitz ahorowitzesexabuseattorney.com
+
+Stuart S. Mermelstein ssmWsexabuseattorney.com
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740320/EFTA02740320.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740320/EFTA02740320.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..de5b40929a9d92b954b499b5a125feb141590bf5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740320/EFTA02740320.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,686 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740320.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 9,
+  "chars": 10903,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 10.0,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            206.02499999999998,
+            70.47
+          ],
+          [
+            410.44708251953125,
+            70.47
+          ],
+          [
+            410.44708251953125,
+            100.4730224609375
+          ],
+          [
+            206.02499999999998,
+            100.4730224609375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's Emergency Motion For Protective Order, Motion to \nOuash and Motion for Attorneys' Fees, With Incorporated Memorandum Of Law",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            97.17,
+            346.68
+          ],
+          [
+            525.111083984375,
+            346.68
+          ],
+          [
+            525.111083984375,
+            379.10302734375
+          ],
+          [
+            97.17,
+            379.10302734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Rule 7.1 Certification",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            264.45000000000005,
+            486.0
+          ],
+          [
+            370.9460144042969,
+            486.0
+          ],
+          [
+            370.9460144042969,
+            498.96
+          ],
+          [
+            264.45000000000005,
+            498.96
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Certificate of Service",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            255.16209411621094,
+            208.98
+          ],
+          [
+            361.08160400390625,
+            208.98
+          ],
+          [
+            361.08160400390625,
+            221.13000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            255.16209411621094,
+            221.13000000000002
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Certificate of Service",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            258.29999999999995,
+            584.01
+          ],
+          [
+            364.8292236328125,
+            584.01
+          ],
+          [
+            364.8292236328125,
+            596.16
+          ],
+          [
+            258.29999999999995,
+            596.16
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            188.805,
+            85.05
+          ],
+          [
+            436.65,
+            85.05
+          ],
+          [
+            436.65,
+            101.25
+          ],
+          [
+            188.805,
+            101.25
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "SUBPOENA TO TESTIFY AT A DEPOSITION IN A CIVIL ACTION",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            156.21,
+            224.37
+          ],
+          [
+            466.78499999999997,
+            224.37
+          ],
+          [
+            466.78499999999997,
+            236.51999999999998
+          ],
+          [
+            156.21,
+            236.51999999999998
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "PROOF OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            255.84,
+            110.16000000000003
+          ],
+          [
+            360.6282043457031,
+            110.16000000000003
+          ],
+          [
+            360.6282043457031,
+            124.0946044921875
+          ],
+          [
+            255.84,
+            124.0946044921875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            210.94500000000005,
+            85.05
+          ],
+          [
+            405.90000000000003,
+            85.05
+          ],
+          [
+            405.90000000000003,
+            112.59
+          ],
+          [
+            210.94500000000005,
+            112.59
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Related Cases:",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            84.255,
+            290.78999999999996
+          ],
+          [
+            164.205,
+            290.78999999999996
+          ],
+          [
+            164.205,
+            303.75
+          ],
+          [
+            84.255,
+            303.75
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "PLAINTIFF'S CROSS-NOTICE OF VIDEO DEPOSITION OF MARITZA MILAGROS VASQUEZ",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            147.6,
+            395.28
+          ],
+          [
+            460.02,
+            395.28
+          ],
+          [
+            460.02,
+            422.01000000000005
+          ],
+          [
+            147.6,
+            422.01000000000005
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            231.59999084472656,
+            183.65887451171875
+          ],
+          [
+            379.455,
+            183.65887451171875
+          ],
+          [
+            379.455,
+            198.45000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            231.59999084472656,
+            198.45000000000002
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "SERVICE LIST",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            267.525,
+            129.60000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            350.009521484375,
+            129.60000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            350.009521484375,
+            143.37
+          ],
+          [
+            267.525,
+            143.37
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            68
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            33
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            11
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            372
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            261
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            41
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            185
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            44
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            42
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            84
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            59
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            40
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "Table",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            54
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            23
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            16
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            59
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            30
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            23
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "Table",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            37
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            18
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            107
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            30
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            13
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02740320"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740329/EFTA02740329.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740329/EFTA02740329.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8a34afa89dc5aefc94714e2b23f5b603184e9010
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740329/EFTA02740329.md
@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
+# UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO. 08-CIV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON
+
+JANE DOE NO. 2,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+Related cases:
+
+08-80232, 08-08380, 08-80381, 08-80994
+
+08-80993, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469,
+
+09-80591., 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092
+
+# PLAINTIFF, C.L.'S NOTICE OF WITHDRAWING SUBPOENA SERVED ON MARITZA MILAGROS VASOUEZ AND CANCELLING DEPOSITION SCHEDULED FOR JUNE 15, 2010
+
+Plaintiff, C.L., by and through her undersigned counsel, hereby gives notice of withdrawing the Subpoena for Deposition directed to Maritza Milagros Vasquez and, further, gives notice of canceling the deposition of Maritza Milagros Vasquez scheduled for June 15, 2010 in the C.L. v. Epstein Case No. 10-80447-CIV-Marra/Johnson pending in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida.
+
+# CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
+
+I hereby certify that on June 14, 2010, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record or pro se parties identified on the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those counsel or parties who are not authorized to receive electronically.
+
+s/SPENCER T. KUV1N SPENCER T. KUVIN (Florida Bar No.: 089737) Email: skuvin@leopoldkuvin.com Leopold—Kuvin, P.A. 2925 PGA Boulevard, Suite 200 Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 (561) 515-1400; (561) 515-1401 (facsimile) Attorneys for Plaintiff, C.L.
+
+Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq.  
+Adam D. Horowitz, Esq.  
+Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A.  
+18205 Biscayne Boulevard  
+Suite 2218  
+Miami, FL 33160  
+305-931-2200  
+Fax: 305-931-0877  
+[ssm@sexabuseattorney.com](mailto:ssm@sexabuseattorney.com)  
+[ahorowitz@sexabuseattorney.com](mailto:ahorowitz@sexabuseattorney.com)
+
+*Counsel for Plaintiffs*  
+*In related Cases Nos. 08-80069, 08-80119,*  
+*08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80993,*  
+*08-80994*
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq.  
+Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.  
+250 Australian Avenue South  
+Suite 1400  
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012  
+561-659-8300  
+Fax: 561-835-8691  
+[jagesq@bellsouth.net](mailto:jagesq@bellsouth.net)
+
+*Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein*
+
+Robert D. Critton, Jr., Esq.  
+Florida Bar No. 224162  
+rcrit@bclclaw.com  
+Michael J. Pike, Esq.  
+Florida Bar No. 617296  
+mpike@bclclaw.com
+
+Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman  
+515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400  
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401  
+561-842-2820  
+561-515-3148 Fax  
+Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
+
+Brad [REDACTED], Esq.  
+Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler  
+401 East Las Olas Boulevard  
+Suite 1650  
+Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301  
+Phone: 954-522-3456  
+Fax: 954-527-8663  
+[bedwards@rra-law.com](mailto:bedwards@rra-law.com)  
+*Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No.*  
+*08-80893*
+
+Paul G. Cassell, Esq.  
+*Pro Hac Vice*  
+332 South 1400 E, Room 101  
+Salt Lake City, UT 84112  
+801-585-5202  
+801-585-6833 Fax  
+[cassellp@law.utah.edu](mailto:cassellp@law.utah.edu)  
+*Co-counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe*
+
+Isidro M. [REDACTED], Esq.  
+[REDACTED] Law Firm, P.A.  
+224 Datura Street, Suite 900  
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401  
+561-832-7732  
+561-832-7137 F  
+[isidrogarcia@bellsouth.net](mailto:isidrogarcia@bellsouth.net)  
+*Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No.*  
+*08-80469*
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740329/EFTA02740329.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740329/EFTA02740329.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..507879c3132298d69bed4a5f86faeca9124f3503
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740329/EFTA02740329.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,162 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740329.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 2,
+  "chars": 3413,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 7.05,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            202.572,
+            45.36
+          ],
+          [
+            402.9547119140625,
+            45.36
+          ],
+          [
+            402.9547119140625,
+            73.7335205078125
+          ],
+          [
+            202.572,
+            73.7335205078125
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "PLAINTIFF, C.L.'S NOTICE OF WITHDRAWING SUBPOENA SERVED \nON MARITZA MILAGROS VASOUEZ AND CANCELLING DEPOSITION \nSCHEDULED FOR JUNE 15, 2010",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            98.53200000000001,
+            335.34000000000003
+          ],
+          [
+            506.2030029296875,
+            335.34000000000003
+          ],
+          [
+            506.2030029296875,
+            377.8535461425781
+          ],
+          [
+            98.53200000000001,
+            377.8535461425781
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            219.70799999999997,
+            529.74
+          ],
+          [
+            385.1445617675781,
+            529.74
+          ],
+          [
+            385.1445617675781,
+            543.9735412597656
+          ],
+          [
+            219.70799999999997,
+            543.9735412597656
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            75
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            37
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            13
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02740329"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740331/EFTA02740331.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740331/EFTA02740331.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0cdfef8c8a135e0d7ec8bfdf49ee16c998e0176d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740331/EFTA02740331.md
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+v.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## FINAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
+
+THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the parties' Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice [DE 1, filed June , 2010. The Court has reviewed the Stipulation, the pertinent portions of the record, and is otherwise advised in the premises. In accordance with the parties' Stipulation, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:
+
+- 1. The above-styled action is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
+- 2. All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT.
+- 3. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the parties' settlement.
+- 4. The Clerk shall CLOSE THIS CASE.
+
+DONE AND ORDERED in of June 2010. at West Palm Beach, Florida this day
+
+Copies Furnished to: All Counsel of Record KENNETH A. MARRA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740331/EFTA02740331.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740331/EFTA02740331.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7251b8f4e914b52625caaf6710226a3420d89b03
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740331/EFTA02740331.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740331.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 1,
+  "chars": 916,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 0.75,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            215.42399999999998,
+            103.68
+          ],
+          [
+            412.24560546875,
+            103.68
+          ],
+          [
+            412.24560546875,
+            131.68353271484375
+          ],
+          [
+            215.42399999999998,
+            131.68353271484375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "FINAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            196.452,
+            332.90999999999997
+          ],
+          [
+            465.2208251953125,
+            332.90999999999997
+          ],
+          [
+            465.2208251953125,
+            348.06353759765625
+          ],
+          [
+            196.452,
+            348.06353759765625
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            55
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02740331"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740332/EFTA02740332.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740332/EFTA02740332.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9f15d33fe22c0dc93483b987f7a33fb163cfcda8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740332/EFTA02740332.md
@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
+**UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT  
+SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA**
+
+**CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA-[REDACTED]**
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+v.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+\_\_\_\_\_/
+
+**STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE**
+
+Plaintiff, JANE DOE NO. 3 and Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, (collectively, "Parties"), by and through their undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rule 41(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby stipulate to the dismissal of this action with prejudice. Each party shall bear their own attorneys fees and costs. The Parties further stipulate that the Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Parties' settlement.
+
+Dated this 25<sup>th</sup> day of June, 2010
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER &  
+COLEMAN, LLP  
+Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein
+
+![]()MERMELSTEIN & HOROWITZ, P.A.  
+Attorneys for Jane Doe No. 3
+
+![]()Page 2
+
+Suite 400  
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401  
+561/842-2820 Phone  
+561/515-3148 Fax
+
+Suite 2218  
+Miami, FL 33160  
+305-931-2200  
+Fax: 305-931-0877
+
+**Certificate of Service**
+
+I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record identified on the following Service List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on this 25<sup>th</sup> day of June, 2010:
+
+![]()By: /s/ Robert D. Critton, Jr.  
+ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ.  
+Florida Bar No. 224162  
+rcrit@bclclaw.com  
+MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ.  
+Florida Bar No. 617296  
+mpike@bclclaw.com  
+BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN, LLP  
+303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400  
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401  
+561/842-2820 Phone  
+561/515-3148 Fax  
+(Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein)
+
+Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq.  
+Adam D. Horowitz, Esq.  
+Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A.  
+18205 Biscayne Boulevard  
+Suite 2218  
+Miami, FL 33160  
+305-931-2200  
+Fax: 305-931-0877  
+ssm@sexabuseattorney.com  
+ahorowitz@sexabuseattorney.com  
+Counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 3
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger  
+Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.  
+250 Australian Avenue South  
+Suite 1400  
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012  
+561-659-8300  
+Fax: 561-835-8691  
+jagesq@bellsouth.net  
+Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740332/EFTA02740332.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740332/EFTA02740332.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0e749af326fa37fcaebdfbd444580c11ce90465d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740332/EFTA02740332.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,162 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740332.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 2,
+  "chars": 2277,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 5.7,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            216.036,
+            106.92
+          ],
+          [
+            411.26400000000007,
+            106.92
+          ],
+          [
+            411.26400000000007,
+            132.03000000000003
+          ],
+          [
+            216.036,
+            132.03000000000003
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            181.152,
+            321.57000000000005
+          ],
+          [
+            446.148,
+            321.57000000000005
+          ],
+          [
+            446.148,
+            335.34000000000003
+          ],
+          [
+            181.152,
+            335.34000000000003
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Certificate of Service",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            253.98,
+            180.63
+          ],
+          [
+            370.87199999999996,
+            180.63
+          ],
+          [
+            370.87199999999996,
+            193.59
+          ],
+          [
+            253.98,
+            193.59
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            59
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            29
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            16
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02740332"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740334/EFTA02740334.md b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740334/EFTA02740334.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ad864fa56d050bf98693c36e82a77559fbf6700f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740334/EFTA02740334.md
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRAMMI
+
+JANE DOE NO. 3
+
+Plaintiff, v.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## FINAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
+
+THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the parties' Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice (DOA, filed June25, 2010. The Court has reviewed the Stipulation, the pertinent portions of the record, and is otherwise advised in the premises. In accordance with the parties' Stipulation, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:
+
+- 1. The above-styled action is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
+- 2. All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT.
+- 3. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the parties' settlement.
+- 4. The Clerk shall CLOSE THIS CASE.
+
+DONE AND ORDERED In at West Palm Beach, Florida this .2)3-- "day
+
+of June 2010.
+
+KENNETH A. MARRA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
+
+Copies Furnished to: All Counsel of Record
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740334/EFTA02740334.metadata.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740334/EFTA02740334.metadata.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3c20cd5e329ebd1e1e5a8cb4bf2a85720c30c881
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740334/EFTA02740334.metadata.json
@@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740334.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 1,
+  "chars": 928,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 0.73,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            216.23997497558594,
+            116.40167236328125
+          ],
+          [
+            404.6700000000001,
+            116.40167236328125
+          ],
+          [
+            404.6700000000001,
+            141.9305419921875
+          ],
+          [
+            216.23997497558594,
+            141.9305419921875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "FINAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            198.03000000000003,
+            336.96
+          ],
+          [
+            455.71500000000003,
+            336.96
+          ],
+          [
+            455.71500000000003,
+            350.73
+          ],
+          [
+            198.03000000000003,
+            350.73
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02740334"
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/ocr-manifest.json b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/ocr-manifest.json
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d2f047ba2152eeb790e226c9d51efec1bfbb6e91
--- /dev/null
+++ b/marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/ocr-manifest.json
@@ -0,0 +1,4628 @@
+{
+  "source_dir": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein",
+  "output_dir": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein",
+  "created_at": "2026-09-18T03:57:21.876350+00:00",
+  "updated_at": "2026-09-18T09:17:37.189328+00:00",
+  "tasks": {
+    "d8fafb0a09ea6f13686226ccf5fc5e544e7eec88e9f2ad04abeeaec11632d16f": {
+      "sha": "d8fafb0a09ea6f13686226ccf5fc5e544e7eec88e9f2ad04abeeaec11632d16f",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739227.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739227.pdf",
+      "size": 679226,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 6,
+      "chars": 27633,
+      "elapsed": 9.286693230038509,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739227/EFTA02739227.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "2c77567ba5ade7b1c9f036acda30178ba8254a7c0c72d7e2f2e82e309d9fef89": {
+      "sha": "2c77567ba5ade7b1c9f036acda30178ba8254a7c0c72d7e2f2e82e309d9fef89",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739233.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739233.pdf",
+      "size": 96279,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 1,
+      "chars": 1050,
+      "elapsed": 1.1649715809617192,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739233/EFTA02739233.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "259b3d152593a8954da237cdc20271c341ba5c8db92f028d9c4754bcd8be700d": {
+      "sha": "259b3d152593a8954da237cdc20271c341ba5c8db92f028d9c4754bcd8be700d",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739234.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739234.pdf",
+      "size": 173608,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 2,
+      "chars": 2695,
+      "elapsed": 0.7393659669905901,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739234/EFTA02739234.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "6b735e7fb1f0443cb2d34c68ec92783ddebec590549ac7e7a021d976f2e4f6a7": {
+      "sha": "6b735e7fb1f0443cb2d34c68ec92783ddebec590549ac7e7a021d976f2e4f6a7",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739236.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739236.pdf",
+      "size": 174777,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 1,
+      "chars": 2668,
+      "elapsed": 11.590254999930039,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739236/EFTA02739236.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "40164f28a4212c31dd4bc1c3858cb43527f32609f7f68386cef8ab3cf6a9336e": {
+      "sha": "40164f28a4212c31dd4bc1c3858cb43527f32609f7f68386cef8ab3cf6a9336e",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739237.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739237.pdf",
+      "size": 270804,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 2,
+      "chars": 3411,
+      "elapsed": 5.503277292940766,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739237/EFTA02739237.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "ccf8b105357848663f58565d0cc90f80ba5118e8d40eaba9d5c4326517524918": {
+      "sha": "ccf8b105357848663f58565d0cc90f80ba5118e8d40eaba9d5c4326517524918",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739239.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739239.pdf",
+      "size": 38278,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 1,
+      "chars": 387,
+      "elapsed": 0.8737199790775776,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739239/EFTA02739239.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "15c6c35cd714479bba2241fe8e24ea5d189fba2f3412048c7d61d85e7d356afc": {
+      "sha": "15c6c35cd714479bba2241fe8e24ea5d189fba2f3412048c7d61d85e7d356afc",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739240.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739240.pdf",
+      "size": 180258,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 3,
+      "chars": 2436,
+      "elapsed": 0.9212592840194702,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739240/EFTA02739240.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "91fbc883827e4a74eee7df292cd93486e86f047cb26a4f07941abdc7eb628fa9": {
+      "sha": "91fbc883827e4a74eee7df292cd93486e86f047cb26a4f07941abdc7eb628fa9",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739243.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739243.pdf",
+      "size": 77969,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 1,
+      "chars": 849,
+      "elapsed": 0.8785071360180154,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739243/EFTA02739243.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "96340aab74aa28af1a5d7bf2e1b1abe33e48e71899d7fc9b075239f65a56ad6d": {
+      "sha": "96340aab74aa28af1a5d7bf2e1b1abe33e48e71899d7fc9b075239f65a56ad6d",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739244.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739244.pdf",
+      "size": 123587,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 2,
+      "chars": 1037,
+      "elapsed": 4.440378356957808,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739244/EFTA02739244.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "87c838ae797c09a8cd2b9c11ec6c694337dd6203cb2cdf7d9e7dcf34783753c6": {
+      "sha": "87c838ae797c09a8cd2b9c11ec6c694337dd6203cb2cdf7d9e7dcf34783753c6",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739246.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739246.pdf",
+      "size": 1027727,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 11,
+      "chars": 14092,
+      "elapsed": 1.4329898530850187,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739246/EFTA02739246.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "affb104714c717e589f7dc3ded80b518364303e13853a967e80fb9341e4a7403": {
+      "sha": "affb104714c717e589f7dc3ded80b518364303e13853a967e80fb9341e4a7403",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739257.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739257.pdf",
+      "size": 601469,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 6,
+      "chars": 6541,
+      "elapsed": 0.9683446029666811,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739257/EFTA02739257.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "ee4b71205882d039a4e445f2d327375ed98cb4f5cdad2f38de7b12cd8aeb9a14": {
+      "sha": "ee4b71205882d039a4e445f2d327375ed98cb4f5cdad2f38de7b12cd8aeb9a14",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739263.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739263.pdf",
+      "size": 329225,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 4,
+      "chars": 3197,
+      "elapsed": 0.932074369979091,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739263/EFTA02739263.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "94f3d3313b2a194318604dbccbeb8c4378969078b7be36bc033a4ef2761c28f5": {
+      "sha": "94f3d3313b2a194318604dbccbeb8c4378969078b7be36bc033a4ef2761c28f5",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739267.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739267.pdf",
+      "size": 400348,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 5,
+      "chars": 6113,
+      "elapsed": 1.3068624660372734,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739267/EFTA02739267.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "848b83ac328932675568a82d5da665a73372967b4cabf2daa364632d4cb9f2a2": {
+      "sha": "848b83ac328932675568a82d5da665a73372967b4cabf2daa364632d4cb9f2a2",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739272.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739272.pdf",
+      "size": 706881,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 4,
+      "chars": 9070,
+      "elapsed": 16.1115968109807,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739272/EFTA02739272.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "9dfef61a320d64bba22c6bddb04b8c30b6d3963b0f6c7cd7df8cbc2a528e289c": {
+      "sha": "9dfef61a320d64bba22c6bddb04b8c30b6d3963b0f6c7cd7df8cbc2a528e289c",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739276.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739276.pdf",
+      "size": 139217,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 3,
+      "chars": 1424,
+      "elapsed": 0.8062679300783202,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739276/EFTA02739276.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "a17f8d68501f565e05c0d1f086a5837cacca4512197cf81e77a5344459f1e74b": {
+      "sha": "a17f8d68501f565e05c0d1f086a5837cacca4512197cf81e77a5344459f1e74b",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739279.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739279.pdf",
+      "size": 104084,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 3,
+      "chars": 1166,
+      "elapsed": 0.7633209690684453,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739279/EFTA02739279.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "c54d9ad08ea730ba335fb433fda0aa806768ebc975c33ccf0f2a823d4ce4a99f": {
+      "sha": "c54d9ad08ea730ba335fb433fda0aa806768ebc975c33ccf0f2a823d4ce4a99f",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739282.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739282.pdf",
+      "size": 55533,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 1,
+      "chars": 674,
+      "elapsed": 0.6882765259360895,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739282/EFTA02739282.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "035917b5cec54a8521d15f9842c4eb97cf300e7a16672e5ac1953753dd1c002c": {
+      "sha": "035917b5cec54a8521d15f9842c4eb97cf300e7a16672e5ac1953753dd1c002c",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739283.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739283.pdf",
+      "size": 223267,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 4,
+      "chars": 3143,
+      "elapsed": 0.7634582510218024,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739283/EFTA02739283.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "bba56a8923bf3081d34e86626d6ea41ce63000873415cf76990b6ce2aab2c286": {
+      "sha": "bba56a8923bf3081d34e86626d6ea41ce63000873415cf76990b6ce2aab2c286",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739287.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739287.pdf",
+      "size": 254890,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 2,
+      "chars": 3824,
+      "elapsed": 5.825618225964718,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739287/EFTA02739287.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "81115fd99eb06f074d2b4bd86fa40d2bcb251bf2bae6d0ecdb18aa035048f5b3": {
+      "sha": "81115fd99eb06f074d2b4bd86fa40d2bcb251bf2bae6d0ecdb18aa035048f5b3",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739289.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739289.pdf",
+      "size": 230342,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 3,
+      "chars": 3542,
+      "elapsed": 0.8733589419862255,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739289/EFTA02739289.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "369e7b966eafbdbc209ca290c26cb7f88410ed4b0a0bbc1148c6db3d3631c259": {
+      "sha": "369e7b966eafbdbc209ca290c26cb7f88410ed4b0a0bbc1148c6db3d3631c259",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739292.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739292.pdf",
+      "size": 482152,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 5,
+      "chars": 7806,
+      "elapsed": 1.1919842879287899,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739292/EFTA02739292.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "e73b191d63c4102613d8593b573444048853d0ebe08647f22027d04c0ba4275d": {
+      "sha": "e73b191d63c4102613d8593b573444048853d0ebe08647f22027d04c0ba4275d",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739297.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739297.pdf",
+      "size": 205302,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 4,
+      "chars": 2096,
+      "elapsed": 3.504221957991831,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739297/EFTA02739297.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "7968d3bd0764572e24f97ca4d7610d2fc667fa7cfc9311aedb15e8b473662703": {
+      "sha": "7968d3bd0764572e24f97ca4d7610d2fc667fa7cfc9311aedb15e8b473662703",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739301.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739301.pdf",
+      "size": 274728,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 4,
+      "chars": 3023,
+      "elapsed": 2.779802812030539,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739301/EFTA02739301.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "e633e7eb08e241af961f80d72c58001d54ccf319e39e77d4029f354dc0bce641": {
+      "sha": "e633e7eb08e241af961f80d72c58001d54ccf319e39e77d4029f354dc0bce641",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739305.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739305.pdf",
+      "size": 317096,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 3,
+      "chars": 3989,
+      "elapsed": 0.9359463868895546,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739305/EFTA02739305.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "3dc5bcaa1fc8d0eb033aee7496f569a7f4f1bfe831c1ca80f0a4fd41763b438b": {
+      "sha": "3dc5bcaa1fc8d0eb033aee7496f569a7f4f1bfe831c1ca80f0a4fd41763b438b",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739308.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739308.pdf",
+      "size": 869393,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 9,
+      "chars": 14274,
+      "elapsed": 1.2011613099602982,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739308/EFTA02739308.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "ac14aa157dd2778f72909a229c8946c828f343aa24e60bde4eb60d550023d12c": {
+      "sha": "ac14aa157dd2778f72909a229c8946c828f343aa24e60bde4eb60d550023d12c",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739317.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739317.pdf",
+      "size": 113019,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 2,
+      "chars": 1557,
+      "elapsed": 0.6670796099351719,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739317/EFTA02739317.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "4950a695e5be34fa16c9bfe5938cb3244dbc65a1bc6be5f93a557be89ac42435": {
+      "sha": "4950a695e5be34fa16c9bfe5938cb3244dbc65a1bc6be5f93a557be89ac42435",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739319.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739319.pdf",
+      "size": 169360,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 3,
+      "chars": 1705,
+      "elapsed": 0.8953657749807462,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739319/EFTA02739319.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "69d89177221e43269dbfa3d640eba3e2dccc8be88dcb9a3dc9761b8b2743b239": {
+      "sha": "69d89177221e43269dbfa3d640eba3e2dccc8be88dcb9a3dc9761b8b2743b239",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739322.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739322.pdf",
+      "size": 248297,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 3,
+      "chars": 4064,
+      "elapsed": 0.85426010703668,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739322/EFTA02739322.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "d942e25acca801ee8c237fc20c650ff5534a74f2259f341e4d36f2a150984d9a": {
+      "sha": "d942e25acca801ee8c237fc20c650ff5534a74f2259f341e4d36f2a150984d9a",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739325.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739325.pdf",
+      "size": 2538183,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 22,
+      "chars": 35831,
+      "elapsed": 19.60307275003288,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739325/EFTA02739325.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "477f3dd0f9c718d5e9bccee10177d3951b47715c92c4386816cbe07c48847a64": {
+      "sha": "477f3dd0f9c718d5e9bccee10177d3951b47715c92c4386816cbe07c48847a64",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739347.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739347.pdf",
+      "size": 172646,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 3,
+      "chars": 1890,
+      "elapsed": 1.4426096060778946,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739347/EFTA02739347.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "f3095c923a368a86adafb627e3dcad45ec6f9f76fee848e399bb216d8dc837c9": {
+      "sha": "f3095c923a368a86adafb627e3dcad45ec6f9f76fee848e399bb216d8dc837c9",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739350.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739350.pdf",
+      "size": 159338,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 3,
+      "chars": 2006,
+      "elapsed": 1.2665816789958626,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739350/EFTA02739350.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "77d30790f860614cbf4cc8abea613ae9a2eace70e40c43d1be502f8e544f64db": {
+      "sha": "77d30790f860614cbf4cc8abea613ae9a2eace70e40c43d1be502f8e544f64db",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739353.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739353.pdf",
+      "size": 144284,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 3,
+      "chars": 1758,
+      "elapsed": 1.1912547569954768,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739353/EFTA02739353.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "4c0b2054da7c590b07a89f46758623e960307a1abb1839d8387e78bede5a0313": {
+      "sha": "4c0b2054da7c590b07a89f46758623e960307a1abb1839d8387e78bede5a0313",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739356.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739356.pdf",
+      "size": 187212,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 2,
+      "chars": 2970,
+      "elapsed": 0.7928621940081939,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739356/EFTA02739356.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "1c096798accf9cef2e694a105038f9c55d53057316b259a3fbb30b699d527dbd": {
+      "sha": "1c096798accf9cef2e694a105038f9c55d53057316b259a3fbb30b699d527dbd",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739358.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739358.pdf",
+      "size": 484876,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 5,
+      "chars": 8737,
+      "elapsed": 1.0117464669747278,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739358/EFTA02739358.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "fb43ebcac62806309d362f277e2dcc1ab2807914a15ace90d4337a2aa8677627": {
+      "sha": "fb43ebcac62806309d362f277e2dcc1ab2807914a15ace90d4337a2aa8677627",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739363.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739363.pdf",
+      "size": 153739,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 2,
+      "chars": 2145,
+      "elapsed": 1.1721070000203326,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739363/EFTA02739363.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "6be55186eff8aebb36169c6eaf39bfc54354313b75b19913a34b36814da49fe7": {
+      "sha": "6be55186eff8aebb36169c6eaf39bfc54354313b75b19913a34b36814da49fe7",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739365.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739365.pdf",
+      "size": 75015,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 2,
+      "chars": 807,
+      "elapsed": 1.1738747280323878,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739365/EFTA02739365.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "8ed63d8745cbce236c68bd2befbf1745046f827adcb8d4eeb0687ad4a9d82a65": {
+      "sha": "8ed63d8745cbce236c68bd2befbf1745046f827adcb8d4eeb0687ad4a9d82a65",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739367.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739367.pdf",
+      "size": 156115,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 2,
+      "chars": 2208,
+      "elapsed": 1.129733617999591,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739367/EFTA02739367.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "8c14abda81f28db65f2c3b15d9ffd610d57662120c8cf1f69235b1f8e25f6410": {
+      "sha": "8c14abda81f28db65f2c3b15d9ffd610d57662120c8cf1f69235b1f8e25f6410",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739369.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739369.pdf",
+      "size": 233142,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 4,
+      "chars": 2808,
+      "elapsed": 1.3598118230002,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739369/EFTA02739369.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "0c2b11891daf48d88942024ecc8aaed6063b716548d046d3d7701470b8406df5": {
+      "sha": "0c2b11891daf48d88942024ecc8aaed6063b716548d046d3d7701470b8406df5",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739373.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739373.pdf",
+      "size": 1690007,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 13,
+      "chars": 29536,
+      "elapsed": 13.855072909966111,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739373/EFTA02739373.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "7a3852141a425cdc6e7dc66af26db268554402f99e655705d614084979f74dba": {
+      "sha": "7a3852141a425cdc6e7dc66af26db268554402f99e655705d614084979f74dba",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739386.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739386.pdf",
+      "size": 157307,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 2,
+      "chars": 1797,
+      "elapsed": 3.884405239019543,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739386/EFTA02739386.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "08f3d262988298c93f0851a92245812760e2b31d21010c7baffca431e6d439cf": {
+      "sha": "08f3d262988298c93f0851a92245812760e2b31d21010c7baffca431e6d439cf",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739388.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739388.pdf",
+      "size": 733775,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 8,
+      "chars": 8664,
+      "elapsed": 1.1230979399988428,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739388/EFTA02739388.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "b5a5cc76562f4f926da74c6cfd3024f63bfb73a1f8a77fa531c54fb1c65ec421": {
+      "sha": "b5a5cc76562f4f926da74c6cfd3024f63bfb73a1f8a77fa531c54fb1c65ec421",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739396.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739396.pdf",
+      "size": 389683,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 5,
+      "chars": 5892,
+      "elapsed": 1.0171106150373816,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739396/EFTA02739396.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "3a382da2710b5dbd0fc6277ab302c7e2debbfca8f65d23e64d64a34f02db5730": {
+      "sha": "3a382da2710b5dbd0fc6277ab302c7e2debbfca8f65d23e64d64a34f02db5730",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739401.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739401.pdf",
+      "size": 621419,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 8,
+      "chars": 9482,
+      "elapsed": 1.454911592998542,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739401/EFTA02739401.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "92d318678af99e73572191fd76a6720133b1eb5febf6b3be6fe377464506ad0c": {
+      "sha": "92d318678af99e73572191fd76a6720133b1eb5febf6b3be6fe377464506ad0c",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739409.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739409.pdf",
+      "size": 74943,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 1,
+      "chars": 1010,
+      "elapsed": 0.7219924699747935,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739409/EFTA02739409.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "c60a11bfdb963aeb5e6d7c015cbb30dfbc70be633460241e2528f66310d77fe9": {
+      "sha": "c60a11bfdb963aeb5e6d7c015cbb30dfbc70be633460241e2528f66310d77fe9",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739410.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739410.pdf",
+      "size": 581947,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 7,
+      "chars": 9117,
+      "elapsed": 1.6910282609751448,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739410/EFTA02739410.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "41a962ebca4232ed124b2e9c3adb067ff065c88c8aa6d7182d8072e5198021af": {
+      "sha": "41a962ebca4232ed124b2e9c3adb067ff065c88c8aa6d7182d8072e5198021af",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739417.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739417.pdf",
+      "size": 452391,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 6,
+      "chars": 7711,
+      "elapsed": 1.62408531003166,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739417/EFTA02739417.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "8c5d93cc10d34a212f69a9ba40891180364fc46628c8c4341aca65f785d4218b": {
+      "sha": "8c5d93cc10d34a212f69a9ba40891180364fc46628c8c4341aca65f785d4218b",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739423.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739423.pdf",
+      "size": 1383643,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 10,
+      "chars": 17339,
+      "elapsed": 7.294944330002181,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739423/EFTA02739423.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "0b9e9aa93cdce9bc1a607ffa2a052ece7577acb43fcc06705c170a6adaee0f23": {
+      "sha": "0b9e9aa93cdce9bc1a607ffa2a052ece7577acb43fcc06705c170a6adaee0f23",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739433.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739433.pdf",
+      "size": 78285,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 2,
+      "chars": 882,
+      "elapsed": 1.1078503159806132,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739433/EFTA02739433.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "34bf4ec22b306e36bb2f26890e748f662ee1c58b4309ed7d31724faafaf9dbc2": {
+      "sha": "34bf4ec22b306e36bb2f26890e748f662ee1c58b4309ed7d31724faafaf9dbc2",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739435.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739435.pdf",
+      "size": 256876,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 4,
+      "chars": 3652,
+      "elapsed": 1.2130246669985354,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739435/EFTA02739435.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "077d5fbffa35d355261df097442d561bdfd8c5506e855763f5c6b24d5406690b": {
+      "sha": "077d5fbffa35d355261df097442d561bdfd8c5506e855763f5c6b24d5406690b",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739439.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739439.pdf",
+      "size": 86928,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 2,
+      "chars": 913,
+      "elapsed": 1.4613347310805693,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739439/EFTA02739439.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "4bebe7b4abc9fa8005a7818964bd49dda5e43a3f061b25396e786fde1bbc2e4d": {
+      "sha": "4bebe7b4abc9fa8005a7818964bd49dda5e43a3f061b25396e786fde1bbc2e4d",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739441.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739441.pdf",
+      "size": 263299,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 2,
+      "chars": 3515,
+      "elapsed": 0.922918827040121,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739441/EFTA02739441.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "a06bd33968eb92b273985da2f1d90c9c3b9d12becc9342d58924b41a40e03fcc": {
+      "sha": "a06bd33968eb92b273985da2f1d90c9c3b9d12becc9342d58924b41a40e03fcc",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739443.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739443.pdf",
+      "size": 977864,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 11,
+      "chars": 15682,
+      "elapsed": 1.70515895599965,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739443/EFTA02739443.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "7b4894914b09ee70f7466b81e535c0e7eeedc4984ba59f70e8504f720cec05b9": {
+      "sha": "7b4894914b09ee70f7466b81e535c0e7eeedc4984ba59f70e8504f720cec05b9",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739454.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739454.pdf",
+      "size": 366816,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 3,
+      "chars": 4923,
+      "elapsed": 7.080358812934719,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739454/EFTA02739454.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "9ba6a40e25938fb98febc2c8d0414ec3a79da3abc61c73e4a400bb2fc80a4166": {
+      "sha": "9ba6a40e25938fb98febc2c8d0414ec3a79da3abc61c73e4a400bb2fc80a4166",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739457.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739457.pdf",
+      "size": 133807,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 2,
+      "chars": 1358,
+      "elapsed": 0.9610781079391018,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739457/EFTA02739457.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "4bdde4e32e6b737f1cc938e9eb8da944cdb983c44f33cffa39acda4f1a66fa5e": {
+      "sha": "4bdde4e32e6b737f1cc938e9eb8da944cdb983c44f33cffa39acda4f1a66fa5e",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739459.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739459.pdf",
+      "size": 1221813,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 11,
+      "chars": 20694,
+      "elapsed": 1.627192229963839,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739459/EFTA02739459.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "4e014fcde3557df76c09efd67d8a41651d12a1433078f89f95fb4efeb4744fc0": {
+      "sha": "4e014fcde3557df76c09efd67d8a41651d12a1433078f89f95fb4efeb4744fc0",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739470.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739470.pdf",
+      "size": 135732,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 3,
+      "chars": 1672,
+      "elapsed": 1.3435035441070795,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739470/EFTA02739470.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "d0980f6d34b7ab7f4a2c56c82ac22c50ddd66f445cfa2c40f4ebd9ef31c0f1f8": {
+      "sha": "d0980f6d34b7ab7f4a2c56c82ac22c50ddd66f445cfa2c40f4ebd9ef31c0f1f8",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739473.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739473.pdf",
+      "size": 626595,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 8,
+      "chars": 9943,
+      "elapsed": 1.1395539249060676,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739473/EFTA02739473.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "5bbeaf3dc55dc399893e1db825fae2d7b0873a0f2e8845d3696a9641b73cc0a5": {
+      "sha": "5bbeaf3dc55dc399893e1db825fae2d7b0873a0f2e8845d3696a9641b73cc0a5",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739481.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739481.pdf",
+      "size": 1845223,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 11,
+      "chars": 26226,
+      "elapsed": 12.367168730939738,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739481/EFTA02739481.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "199e611b35fe76cac3b08de988ebe28d85bc19858e876e9b3874ef1673958c91": {
+      "sha": "199e611b35fe76cac3b08de988ebe28d85bc19858e876e9b3874ef1673958c91",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739492.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739492.pdf",
+      "size": 2859666,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 24,
+      "chars": 39617,
+      "elapsed": 6.112309996969998,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739492/EFTA02739492.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "18c10702d4106ec149683b34b4f4c24bdc51b4bb2a87e38638cf66b49473b9e4": {
+      "sha": "18c10702d4106ec149683b34b4f4c24bdc51b4bb2a87e38638cf66b49473b9e4",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739516.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739516.pdf",
+      "size": 1478893,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 16,
+      "chars": 26575,
+      "elapsed": 2.8347349519608542,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739516/EFTA02739516.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "24c83f56ad1db65f4f5f3dc77c0fb2a64c547e09905f2856eac55d8f260cd960": {
+      "sha": "24c83f56ad1db65f4f5f3dc77c0fb2a64c547e09905f2856eac55d8f260cd960",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739532.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739532.pdf",
+      "size": 425896,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 4,
+      "chars": 4557,
+      "elapsed": 4.571094747050665,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739532/EFTA02739532.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "a94966c7401966fa8a86570dcdf8b5db70ef0964fbbed6746beed0fc3be549e0": {
+      "sha": "a94966c7401966fa8a86570dcdf8b5db70ef0964fbbed6746beed0fc3be549e0",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739536.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739536.pdf",
+      "size": 437666,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 4,
+      "chars": 5042,
+      "elapsed": 4.831034902948886,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739536/EFTA02739536.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "038e2b13017eeb30f32e8efe7e734703ee94ead2464ebe7c99da39c3424d8c58": {
+      "sha": "038e2b13017eeb30f32e8efe7e734703ee94ead2464ebe7c99da39c3424d8c58",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739540.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739540.pdf",
+      "size": 413229,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 4,
+      "chars": 4420,
+      "elapsed": 3.4256638690130785,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739540/EFTA02739540.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "68a066813a1d5d7f8aadb268b3d9156002d02cae552750348ece83a70d9e0f07": {
+      "sha": "68a066813a1d5d7f8aadb268b3d9156002d02cae552750348ece83a70d9e0f07",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739544.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739544.pdf",
+      "size": 337331,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 3,
+      "chars": 3841,
+      "elapsed": 4.335525780916214,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739544/EFTA02739544.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "f93d08f3dea87c4ed1a09ed8e8a4a5ad1fc757b54e8abaff6e3e6c0570dc3811": {
+      "sha": "f93d08f3dea87c4ed1a09ed8e8a4a5ad1fc757b54e8abaff6e3e6c0570dc3811",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739547.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739547.pdf",
+      "size": 722074,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 8,
+      "chars": 10131,
+      "elapsed": 1.5651413050945848,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739547/EFTA02739547.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "79d4df77c23ebbfd3affeb4f8f8048738c951701d149e3f8d59327d404a47159": {
+      "sha": "79d4df77c23ebbfd3affeb4f8f8048738c951701d149e3f8d59327d404a47159",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739555.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739555.pdf",
+      "size": 1882238,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 14,
+      "chars": 22639,
+      "elapsed": 10.91278452903498,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739555/EFTA02739555.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "dcebdab9a2ddd1fb8f591e7c5894dbfabe7ccccb7287292c9aa6403d78117ac4": {
+      "sha": "dcebdab9a2ddd1fb8f591e7c5894dbfabe7ccccb7287292c9aa6403d78117ac4",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739569.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739569.pdf",
+      "size": 5058975,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 36,
+      "chars": 74250,
+      "elapsed": 12.77276018599514,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739569/EFTA02739569.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "fd4a1c158d81601fc49676f2c2929fa96a639cd227d95c027f16d93cf4c8a274": {
+      "sha": "fd4a1c158d81601fc49676f2c2929fa96a639cd227d95c027f16d93cf4c8a274",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739605.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739605.pdf",
+      "size": 121428,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 1,
+      "chars": 1442,
+      "elapsed": 0.7751604260411114,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739605/EFTA02739605.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "837c8b5957514d74c9177ee97680661f219b7dae18245915a5d7b85d62985d79": {
+      "sha": "837c8b5957514d74c9177ee97680661f219b7dae18245915a5d7b85d62985d79",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739606.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739606.pdf",
+      "size": 338243,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 3,
+      "chars": 3820,
+      "elapsed": 4.486454761005007,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739606/EFTA02739606.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "2d2f8f62479b68c736044185f81b2c7c267ef746ba3f57f77c1c77741bcb93d2": {
+      "sha": "2d2f8f62479b68c736044185f81b2c7c267ef746ba3f57f77c1c77741bcb93d2",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739609.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739609.pdf",
+      "size": 5156878,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 35,
+      "chars": 49139,
+      "elapsed": 15.847993687028065,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739609/EFTA02739609.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "6e1f5979440eeb55c9dc80f95a545191d5a790f00b9999005225e567645bad2b": {
+      "sha": "6e1f5979440eeb55c9dc80f95a545191d5a790f00b9999005225e567645bad2b",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739644.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739644.pdf",
+      "size": 1920495,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 15,
+      "chars": 27516,
+      "elapsed": 10.011648985906504,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739644/EFTA02739644.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "fcc80e919bc9d569e31bcd52f19e64eae8b3303611c23ca4fa0bb9b20abb9742": {
+      "sha": "fcc80e919bc9d569e31bcd52f19e64eae8b3303611c23ca4fa0bb9b20abb9742",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739659.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739659.pdf",
+      "size": 295797,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 3,
+      "chars": 3794,
+      "elapsed": 4.010446656029671,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739659/EFTA02739659.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "4fd4d16cfc3d5d8f5e72cb16dffb00443837a62684ec646ebab5d5c17810ced7": {
+      "sha": "4fd4d16cfc3d5d8f5e72cb16dffb00443837a62684ec646ebab5d5c17810ced7",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739662.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739662.pdf",
+      "size": 177096,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 2,
+      "chars": 2279,
+      "elapsed": 4.64282255503349,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739662/EFTA02739662.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "26f348c257776d688229ade91b02d1a4cb426095b717ae39b22c3895f1d980c4": {
+      "sha": "26f348c257776d688229ade91b02d1a4cb426095b717ae39b22c3895f1d980c4",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739664.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739664.pdf",
+      "size": 811064,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 10,
+      "chars": 12917,
+      "elapsed": 1.220147390034981,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739664/EFTA02739664.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "e3e35969a8561c607d16258be0e4fbeb71c3ea269be37b4eb594a87d1d7e73df": {
+      "sha": "e3e35969a8561c607d16258be0e4fbeb71c3ea269be37b4eb594a87d1d7e73df",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739674.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739674.pdf",
+      "size": 1570984,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 8,
+      "chars": 30142,
+      "elapsed": 18.86681303998921,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739674/EFTA02739674.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "b93ce7cdf43eb9551ceb6096688ae567ca8740e0d92b16be7109aa642e8b009b": {
+      "sha": "b93ce7cdf43eb9551ceb6096688ae567ca8740e0d92b16be7109aa642e8b009b",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739682.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739682.pdf",
+      "size": 269934,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 2,
+      "chars": 3044,
+      "elapsed": 7.300455221091397,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739682/EFTA02739682.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "37023f1fe9a0bab5fb76b097b05462675522fd4cb43df3b53154e06add226bf7": {
+      "sha": "37023f1fe9a0bab5fb76b097b05462675522fd4cb43df3b53154e06add226bf7",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739684.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739684.pdf",
+      "size": 1366676,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 14,
+      "chars": 12860,
+      "elapsed": 1.8124528370099142,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739684/EFTA02739684.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "8be2cef939174151e76589614eff94fb399e5c26bff9f64d4c7aade915322dc5": {
+      "sha": "8be2cef939174151e76589614eff94fb399e5c26bff9f64d4c7aade915322dc5",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739698.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739698.pdf",
+      "size": 1848830,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 13,
+      "chars": 23379,
+      "elapsed": 1.9557604789733887,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739698/EFTA02739698.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "4dc728fa02177ff172900b0acb5a481bfe64e805df309ca0e959aead4b18c946": {
+      "sha": "4dc728fa02177ff172900b0acb5a481bfe64e805df309ca0e959aead4b18c946",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739711.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739711.pdf",
+      "size": 1572912,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 8,
+      "chars": 30050,
+      "elapsed": 18.752982100006193,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739711/EFTA02739711.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "3def4a176cd039ea73dce827c185bfd6f6d99c1c818b5b03915237482868fa28": {
+      "sha": "3def4a176cd039ea73dce827c185bfd6f6d99c1c818b5b03915237482868fa28",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739719.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739719.pdf",
+      "size": 270200,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 2,
+      "chars": 2994,
+      "elapsed": 6.936818293994293,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739719/EFTA02739719.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "48b3cd2d683a1aea0d71f4a2b89598a8728a082c9da34b15d569b899bb9f68e3": {
+      "sha": "48b3cd2d683a1aea0d71f4a2b89598a8728a082c9da34b15d569b899bb9f68e3",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739721.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739721.pdf",
+      "size": 1365366,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 14,
+      "chars": 12861,
+      "elapsed": 2.0466071099508554,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739721/EFTA02739721.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "e97902fd3257e38ba9a7c05fada76ac80cc0cda9deaf0aed97b2e4a6bee00e1a": {
+      "sha": "e97902fd3257e38ba9a7c05fada76ac80cc0cda9deaf0aed97b2e4a6bee00e1a",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739735.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739735.pdf",
+      "size": 1370335,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 9,
+      "chars": 17176,
+      "elapsed": 5.388528794050217,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739735/EFTA02739735.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "813500df62e84181716e8105b9c0f97f939ead6d59bc6d35db9d55abade166e1": {
+      "sha": "813500df62e84181716e8105b9c0f97f939ead6d59bc6d35db9d55abade166e1",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739744.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739744.pdf",
+      "size": 863267,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 7,
+      "chars": 10325,
+      "elapsed": 3.9980756629956886,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739744/EFTA02739744.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "0f98de1dd93259ee13d64b73b1c5187323571c91ff2d5b70b528f9278525fdc8": {
+      "sha": "0f98de1dd93259ee13d64b73b1c5187323571c91ff2d5b70b528f9278525fdc8",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739751.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739751.pdf",
+      "size": 84486,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 2,
+      "chars": 996,
+      "elapsed": 1.1229538699844852,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739751/EFTA02739751.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "bed2a4e331f493211b8f27e96b5a66a01e1cef8a148ba24cd2194fda8f89dde1": {
+      "sha": "bed2a4e331f493211b8f27e96b5a66a01e1cef8a148ba24cd2194fda8f89dde1",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739753.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739753.pdf",
+      "size": 256546,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 5,
+      "chars": 3393,
+      "elapsed": 1.3226625340757892,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739753/EFTA02739753.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "38b3cd26aea94be41784fa6e15e1db6db5b98131ba0f6628ed58b357cbb46998": {
+      "sha": "38b3cd26aea94be41784fa6e15e1db6db5b98131ba0f6628ed58b357cbb46998",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739758.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739758.pdf",
+      "size": 338351,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 3,
+      "chars": 3973,
+      "elapsed": 6.109026960097253,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739758/EFTA02739758.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "5bb6ac5df3a3e4563546f9e2a1b95e970236caa2919e312b6cabd61dd2b111fe": {
+      "sha": "5bb6ac5df3a3e4563546f9e2a1b95e970236caa2919e312b6cabd61dd2b111fe",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739761.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739761.pdf",
+      "size": 328031,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 3,
+      "chars": 3721,
+      "elapsed": 4.515704047982581,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739761/EFTA02739761.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "7f45488e387998e8b9ab1558891793c54629276ae8f8b18f51061f98766ebc1d": {
+      "sha": "7f45488e387998e8b9ab1558891793c54629276ae8f8b18f51061f98766ebc1d",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739764.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739764.pdf",
+      "size": 94039,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 2,
+      "chars": 1130,
+      "elapsed": 1.1493164990097284,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739764/EFTA02739764.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "79e50d632af3a1625b053bd25d78ecc471545fb978d13f8da42ff2d3fbdf36cf": {
+      "sha": "79e50d632af3a1625b053bd25d78ecc471545fb978d13f8da42ff2d3fbdf36cf",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739766.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739766.pdf",
+      "size": 245150,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 5,
+      "chars": 3196,
+      "elapsed": 1.3545907380757853,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739766/EFTA02739766.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "eb37bf54be460d716eaba20135b6c800a80cdca87d681d830fb8c706fcbe28b3": {
+      "sha": "eb37bf54be460d716eaba20135b6c800a80cdca87d681d830fb8c706fcbe28b3",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739771.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739771.pdf",
+      "size": 327134,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 3,
+      "chars": 3703,
+      "elapsed": 4.433320429990999,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739771/EFTA02739771.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "3945224ff28935677c6b00d7bc2616968df961330e5c0cccd37fc41e9d10f8b4": {
+      "sha": "3945224ff28935677c6b00d7bc2616968df961330e5c0cccd37fc41e9d10f8b4",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739774.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739774.pdf",
+      "size": 343169,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 3,
+      "chars": 3858,
+      "elapsed": 6.451172963017598,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739774/EFTA02739774.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "b90f642ce5ade8885216cac0c9bf041ce75f92574130f8b96540847099cb3bbc": {
+      "sha": "b90f642ce5ade8885216cac0c9bf041ce75f92574130f8b96540847099cb3bbc",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739777.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739777.pdf",
+      "size": 811300,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 7,
+      "chars": 11225,
+      "elapsed": 3.5711706990841776,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739777/EFTA02739777.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "ef256821d49f587594303018327dfaded68c59c8f8da1ca84d3227008e3c8780": {
+      "sha": "ef256821d49f587594303018327dfaded68c59c8f8da1ca84d3227008e3c8780",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739784.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739784.pdf",
+      "size": 96124,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 2,
+      "chars": 1155,
+      "elapsed": 1.1542582520050928,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739784/EFTA02739784.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "8dbe3ad67a5ae894eab3d3b259e19a56d58503a95e37ddf7e6f543af174dc0b5": {
+      "sha": "8dbe3ad67a5ae894eab3d3b259e19a56d58503a95e37ddf7e6f543af174dc0b5",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739786.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739786.pdf",
+      "size": 271239,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 5,
+      "chars": 3631,
+      "elapsed": 1.300055177998729,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739786/EFTA02739786.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "acefa50e8e31994c0aa7aad5e01f1b63d5d2dbd87b1c1d833e3c46eee5bd2dd0": {
+      "sha": "acefa50e8e31994c0aa7aad5e01f1b63d5d2dbd87b1c1d833e3c46eee5bd2dd0",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739791.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739791.pdf",
+      "size": 1066451,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 11,
+      "chars": 17988,
+      "elapsed": 1.317038204986602,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739791/EFTA02739791.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "2bb2580663adc96c9fb541711e5f1b4bf5082e55eeb2b03f1b05fc3947c57af0": {
+      "sha": "2bb2580663adc96c9fb541711e5f1b4bf5082e55eeb2b03f1b05fc3947c57af0",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739802.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739802.pdf",
+      "size": 765868,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 9,
+      "chars": 13135,
+      "elapsed": 1.8678692060057074,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739802/EFTA02739802.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "ae6adc7df1d0e88a869f98d050cf8af4d1c1107e94a39d757c6f1ca5890c9e8b": {
+      "sha": "ae6adc7df1d0e88a869f98d050cf8af4d1c1107e94a39d757c6f1ca5890c9e8b",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739811.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739811.pdf",
+      "size": 457105,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 6,
+      "chars": 7116,
+      "elapsed": 1.2545722629874945,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739811/EFTA02739811.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "4634c3e3e2ea5110d1ac6ca1a95874e9286291c9b264430ad85e891f8337e88c": {
+      "sha": "4634c3e3e2ea5110d1ac6ca1a95874e9286291c9b264430ad85e891f8337e88c",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739817.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739817.pdf",
+      "size": 227169,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 4,
+      "chars": 3042,
+      "elapsed": 1.3816899189259857,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739817/EFTA02739817.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "7399a6c2533c6620263c4239077fcc970de9cf5bf41f7845fd38b8b6b904c643": {
+      "sha": "7399a6c2533c6620263c4239077fcc970de9cf5bf41f7845fd38b8b6b904c643",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739821.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739821.pdf",
+      "size": 95616,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 2,
+      "chars": 1146,
+      "elapsed": 1.137739866040647,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739821/EFTA02739821.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "7128b8714c9505e9bb0d5859d672fbfb3e357ecf914fd9230c2cd9aa65ca575e": {
+      "sha": "7128b8714c9505e9bb0d5859d672fbfb3e357ecf914fd9230c2cd9aa65ca575e",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739823.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739823.pdf",
+      "size": 272922,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 5,
+      "chars": 3673,
+      "elapsed": 1.3078249429818243,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739823/EFTA02739823.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "b3fb4076123da4c5d922aa436aa4a8e1e6c36a49566a45a6a01df772bc389b65": {
+      "sha": "b3fb4076123da4c5d922aa436aa4a8e1e6c36a49566a45a6a01df772bc389b65",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739828.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739828.pdf",
+      "size": 636318,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 5,
+      "chars": 7458,
+      "elapsed": 3.5494503150694072,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739828/EFTA02739828.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "f2dbcef12f5ed6740a69e7456d60f01cce87e2080b2684b85970caa91a5f8cd5": {
+      "sha": "f2dbcef12f5ed6740a69e7456d60f01cce87e2080b2684b85970caa91a5f8cd5",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739833.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739833.pdf",
+      "size": 305014,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 3,
+      "chars": 3458,
+      "elapsed": 3.5406847700942308,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739833/EFTA02739833.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "d2cc1f1ec16fe6fa57c4cd9bcba12690fd861f5bd6da6556c73c97f2b81ce75e": {
+      "sha": "d2cc1f1ec16fe6fa57c4cd9bcba12690fd861f5bd6da6556c73c97f2b81ce75e",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739836.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739836.pdf",
+      "size": 754864,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 9,
+      "chars": 12108,
+      "elapsed": 1.5362719480181113,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739836/EFTA02739836.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "1f91b54b898013b23d00d89e00312a0804f0cf03c95f572eaac55c75b39e306d": {
+      "sha": "1f91b54b898013b23d00d89e00312a0804f0cf03c95f572eaac55c75b39e306d",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739845.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739845.pdf",
+      "size": 554470,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 5,
+      "chars": 6420,
+      "elapsed": 6.526575198979117,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739845/EFTA02739845.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "c616e4cff045bf332ad8f2cee9a95aded77980115d9af57cc655116f1e4341f4": {
+      "sha": "c616e4cff045bf332ad8f2cee9a95aded77980115d9af57cc655116f1e4341f4",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739850.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739850.pdf",
+      "size": 1503146,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 12,
+      "chars": 18183,
+      "elapsed": 3.474056564969942,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739850/EFTA02739850.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "d0de6e3a3f9e2e45436899e7b114d3862b1dcea8efcc4c7509e28dec8bb813fe": {
+      "sha": "d0de6e3a3f9e2e45436899e7b114d3862b1dcea8efcc4c7509e28dec8bb813fe",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739862.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739862.pdf",
+      "size": 243755,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 2,
+      "chars": 3696,
+      "elapsed": 1.0206559570506215,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739862/EFTA02739862.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "bb88a9730bc142f8f4c1ca2e18cdd7c1ed4c99bfe94b2e69acd850dc6ff99bc5": {
+      "sha": "bb88a9730bc142f8f4c1ca2e18cdd7c1ed4c99bfe94b2e69acd850dc6ff99bc5",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739864.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739864.pdf",
+      "size": 824143,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 10,
+      "chars": 13115,
+      "elapsed": 1.8089933710871264,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739864/EFTA02739864.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "905b1e00543106863912a36e74a4fd7e14d3eb97d9e165e5fc0e8010b2d0559b": {
+      "sha": "905b1e00543106863912a36e74a4fd7e14d3eb97d9e165e5fc0e8010b2d0559b",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739874.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739874.pdf",
+      "size": 464050,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 5,
+      "chars": 5066,
+      "elapsed": 3.983765915967524,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739874/EFTA02739874.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "876a7c052770471f5bfbd65678aa1a3d683f6ca26013977a20ba8a1528853358": {
+      "sha": "876a7c052770471f5bfbd65678aa1a3d683f6ca26013977a20ba8a1528853358",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739879.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739879.pdf",
+      "size": 948521,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 7,
+      "chars": 11917,
+      "elapsed": 1.4634494200581685,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739879/EFTA02739879.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "a7bb4a690f03bbbfe8891d038de8275918fcad9e9cf5010e9bd5cc07bfe54e28": {
+      "sha": "a7bb4a690f03bbbfe8891d038de8275918fcad9e9cf5010e9bd5cc07bfe54e28",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739886.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739886.pdf",
+      "size": 251016,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 5,
+      "chars": 3316,
+      "elapsed": 3.6038291949080303,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739886/EFTA02739886.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "53bcf8157f6c758a72ef5c26b4bae48bced934d04a37761d23005c736560b60d": {
+      "sha": "53bcf8157f6c758a72ef5c26b4bae48bced934d04a37761d23005c736560b60d",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739891.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739891.pdf",
+      "size": 3115665,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 24,
+      "chars": 40935,
+      "elapsed": 11.70792113605421,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739891/EFTA02739891.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "435d088cab53142997dc5f5e902d15403afd67c9e9347cc24ee597c0dd394d44": {
+      "sha": "435d088cab53142997dc5f5e902d15403afd67c9e9347cc24ee597c0dd394d44",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739915.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739915.pdf",
+      "size": 208423,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 4,
+      "chars": 2669,
+      "elapsed": 1.4249200940830633,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739915/EFTA02739915.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "fa1f7826bc26fb0a8d41447246b3ad2ac8f2f54fa60425004cee3e0b1ea5d422": {
+      "sha": "fa1f7826bc26fb0a8d41447246b3ad2ac8f2f54fa60425004cee3e0b1ea5d422",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739919.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739919.pdf",
+      "size": 382458,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 5,
+      "chars": 4233,
+      "elapsed": 1.3683513239957392,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739919/EFTA02739919.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "ca9f7b8d713a1c310dde22ae35d0d33bda85b27c8360bef1bda469954c9f816e": {
+      "sha": "ca9f7b8d713a1c310dde22ae35d0d33bda85b27c8360bef1bda469954c9f816e",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739924.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739924.pdf",
+      "size": 475177,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 6,
+      "chars": 5071,
+      "elapsed": 4.473274087999016,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739924/EFTA02739924.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "fb4fecf88a4782885e522f3a1f63e0779d74b1c9958796f54de94f4fae4c2668": {
+      "sha": "fb4fecf88a4782885e522f3a1f63e0779d74b1c9958796f54de94f4fae4c2668",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739930.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739930.pdf",
+      "size": 1449511,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 13,
+      "chars": 17682,
+      "elapsed": 6.810330365900882,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739930/EFTA02739930.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "985032f89b70692428c5660b738d22c12bad895456eadfa1da239ac30d41169e": {
+      "sha": "985032f89b70692428c5660b738d22c12bad895456eadfa1da239ac30d41169e",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739943.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739943.pdf",
+      "size": 60391,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 1,
+      "chars": 592,
+      "elapsed": 0.7130097999470308,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739943/EFTA02739943.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "bac0d91c6f3872f3121d3094eeb5864513ae16322448b836b2b88e2e13a2fe65": {
+      "sha": "bac0d91c6f3872f3121d3094eeb5864513ae16322448b836b2b88e2e13a2fe65",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739944.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739944.pdf",
+      "size": 181963,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 3,
+      "chars": 1925,
+      "elapsed": 0.8234087680466473,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739944/EFTA02739944.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "8d97dddc4d62d7367d7ad3c6f0051bd1cc1a7f8e10570954f083500e3faa5eaf": {
+      "sha": "8d97dddc4d62d7367d7ad3c6f0051bd1cc1a7f8e10570954f083500e3faa5eaf",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739947.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739947.pdf",
+      "size": 415841,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 6,
+      "chars": 4493,
+      "elapsed": 4.772487687994726,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739947/EFTA02739947.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "fe5c516ff341bb8bc9832be346fa392f9e0dcf958f582026453142a4a052a774": {
+      "sha": "fe5c516ff341bb8bc9832be346fa392f9e0dcf958f582026453142a4a052a774",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739953.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739953.pdf",
+      "size": 347745,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 6,
+      "chars": 4833,
+      "elapsed": 1.629598002997227,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739953/EFTA02739953.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "e7aa1a43abd64714148e0a0cffa8806055aba34102fc8b7d6d0945b640c0e9eb": {
+      "sha": "e7aa1a43abd64714148e0a0cffa8806055aba34102fc8b7d6d0945b640c0e9eb",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739959.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739959.pdf",
+      "size": 144652,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 3,
+      "chars": 1727,
+      "elapsed": 1.3959536430193111,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739959/EFTA02739959.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "3442ae63e952076ea31a1318c8d384c5c9779d749addb5bc6790e71e8106eff0": {
+      "sha": "3442ae63e952076ea31a1318c8d384c5c9779d749addb5bc6790e71e8106eff0",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739962.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739962.pdf",
+      "size": 237446,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 6,
+      "chars": 2707,
+      "elapsed": 1.4337944760918617,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739962/EFTA02739962.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "d7a5c58ef35a5367fd3957da08e6132fd010a9fed09dd5fd1af4781323d578ad": {
+      "sha": "d7a5c58ef35a5367fd3957da08e6132fd010a9fed09dd5fd1af4781323d578ad",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739968.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739968.pdf",
+      "size": 217899,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 4,
+      "chars": 2473,
+      "elapsed": 1.1410419610328972,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739968/EFTA02739968.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "a5b8b3e166b130567cbe21436cfa87a2f97dab2b1a7f3f88e6404ce0873a453b": {
+      "sha": "a5b8b3e166b130567cbe21436cfa87a2f97dab2b1a7f3f88e6404ce0873a453b",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739972.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739972.pdf",
+      "size": 1717637,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 17,
+      "chars": 27504,
+      "elapsed": 2.007030884968117,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739972/EFTA02739972.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "0bb46d7afdba8c98ca479bbd58f97481bc635fbc54ebeea06c1e239e641d7da9": {
+      "sha": "0bb46d7afdba8c98ca479bbd58f97481bc635fbc54ebeea06c1e239e641d7da9",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739989.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02739989.pdf",
+      "size": 1391489,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 17,
+      "chars": 22552,
+      "elapsed": 6.826731004985049,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02739989/EFTA02739989.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "bdd56e1461228b73bdd25c23de5b851a0b6b4cdf743d5e9b1d39c8276593cb52": {
+      "sha": "bdd56e1461228b73bdd25c23de5b851a0b6b4cdf743d5e9b1d39c8276593cb52",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740006.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02740006.pdf",
+      "size": 600856,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 10,
+      "chars": 8224,
+      "elapsed": 6.525395055068657,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740006/EFTA02740006.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "3d4c82b746c6c2d12e180d0dc523b1d726ecfd7550ccc976230ae8d88b074ef0": {
+      "sha": "3d4c82b746c6c2d12e180d0dc523b1d726ecfd7550ccc976230ae8d88b074ef0",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740016.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02740016.pdf",
+      "size": 478518,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 9,
+      "chars": 6273,
+      "elapsed": 2.1353774790186435,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740016/EFTA02740016.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "8563ee916445f619a7700822527058063acc1b7b702128797c770b6dbe36fe78": {
+      "sha": "8563ee916445f619a7700822527058063acc1b7b702128797c770b6dbe36fe78",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740025.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02740025.pdf",
+      "size": 806413,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 11,
+      "chars": 11304,
+      "elapsed": 7.789247249951586,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740025/EFTA02740025.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "f3a0ca50aa1e02fd3e5c6c4a815bee9dcf977723642b83c0edc29bf5d42c3144": {
+      "sha": "f3a0ca50aa1e02fd3e5c6c4a815bee9dcf977723642b83c0edc29bf5d42c3144",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740036.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02740036.pdf",
+      "size": 1341901,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 5,
+      "chars": 13382,
+      "elapsed": 12.757088243030012,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740036/EFTA02740036.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "9df50eb6d27c8d3c1b136fc35a0b05340d8538b8f3ebf59e3f149503c01b3c9d": {
+      "sha": "9df50eb6d27c8d3c1b136fc35a0b05340d8538b8f3ebf59e3f149503c01b3c9d",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740041.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02740041.pdf",
+      "size": 3771237,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 23,
+      "chars": 64748,
+      "elapsed": 17.285612798994407,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740041/EFTA02740041.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "b0f6cff8ac583738afe705f6498f9e6759fc1444f595fe4030855f2841d9a29e": {
+      "sha": "b0f6cff8ac583738afe705f6498f9e6759fc1444f595fe4030855f2841d9a29e",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740064.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02740064.pdf",
+      "size": 1376372,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 15,
+      "chars": 22127,
+      "elapsed": 2.2845227889483795,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740064/EFTA02740064.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "c28ae16008737bb2c06e125ffdae997b6cc893eccf0ff706073cc5daaa927b93": {
+      "sha": "c28ae16008737bb2c06e125ffdae997b6cc893eccf0ff706073cc5daaa927b93",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740079.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02740079.pdf",
+      "size": 447435,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 7,
+      "chars": 6441,
+      "elapsed": 1.5491599700180814,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740079/EFTA02740079.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "fcc14f33d22f033d4b471841fcac1fb11b29f39466eed0b319d8d4aa6d752d05": {
+      "sha": "fcc14f33d22f033d4b471841fcac1fb11b29f39466eed0b319d8d4aa6d752d05",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740086.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02740086.pdf",
+      "size": 1281318,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 10,
+      "chars": 16277,
+      "elapsed": 6.107376733911224,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740086/EFTA02740086.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "b5cec98f7b2103f0e5d7c4b731ed751be542fabf89a521f44ee03a7d857054e9": {
+      "sha": "b5cec98f7b2103f0e5d7c4b731ed751be542fabf89a521f44ee03a7d857054e9",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740096.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02740096.pdf",
+      "size": 84829,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 1,
+      "chars": 986,
+      "elapsed": 0.4630310400389135,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740096/EFTA02740096.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "1f75389b9021eb190b8e165d377181a615ea5c2de05a62623e40baa7f8ccf142": {
+      "sha": "1f75389b9021eb190b8e165d377181a615ea5c2de05a62623e40baa7f8ccf142",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740097.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02740097.pdf",
+      "size": 84356,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 1,
+      "chars": 825,
+      "elapsed": 0.7983689979882911,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740097/EFTA02740097.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "3e27ce6847a129b13262dc36f08aaf1ce7d4ac610e33919ef09b8d03456da3a9": {
+      "sha": "3e27ce6847a129b13262dc36f08aaf1ce7d4ac610e33919ef09b8d03456da3a9",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740098.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02740098.pdf",
+      "size": 395532,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 4,
+      "chars": 4547,
+      "elapsed": 3.2266702000051737,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740098/EFTA02740098.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "4a230c8eb2c77bca820ec9cdc1e880f5e2e9e244af565d1d2996acf83a41740c": {
+      "sha": "4a230c8eb2c77bca820ec9cdc1e880f5e2e9e244af565d1d2996acf83a41740c",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740102.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02740102.pdf",
+      "size": 1265546,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 10,
+      "chars": 16271,
+      "elapsed": 1.6933826060267165,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740102/EFTA02740102.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "a591109db3303a15776417ecb1d25414412fbcd4021e229ae7731ea3d7e2a30c": {
+      "sha": "a591109db3303a15776417ecb1d25414412fbcd4021e229ae7731ea3d7e2a30c",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740112.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02740112.pdf",
+      "size": 1766016,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 16,
+      "chars": 26492,
+      "elapsed": 13.052245049970224,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740112/EFTA02740112.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "b9a113d9d2c69f89becb2e7999e54aeae68a6f7fd02e791d47be5373e0374c05": {
+      "sha": "b9a113d9d2c69f89becb2e7999e54aeae68a6f7fd02e791d47be5373e0374c05",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740128.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02740128.pdf",
+      "size": 676672,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 10,
+      "chars": 9100,
+      "elapsed": 1.8365363130578771,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740128/EFTA02740128.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "82732c7773a5ecac7108c77da28e06a6e0cb139882daf8c6f810df15d7be1696": {
+      "sha": "82732c7773a5ecac7108c77da28e06a6e0cb139882daf8c6f810df15d7be1696",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740138.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02740138.pdf",
+      "size": 2412388,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 20,
+      "chars": 36026,
+      "elapsed": 13.808930569095537,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740138/EFTA02740138.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "d522bd0963ee457dc5dd9c55a2152b14278f61385e5878f18036712e983db6bf": {
+      "sha": "d522bd0963ee457dc5dd9c55a2152b14278f61385e5878f18036712e983db6bf",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740158.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02740158.pdf",
+      "size": 524298,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 7,
+      "chars": 6757,
+      "elapsed": 1.4290047290269285,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740158/EFTA02740158.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "197006977915792a397fcb5076d96d1b4fbbea95d1ff3dab78daeb4d998633a2": {
+      "sha": "197006977915792a397fcb5076d96d1b4fbbea95d1ff3dab78daeb4d998633a2",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740165.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02740165.pdf",
+      "size": 420194,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 7,
+      "chars": 5314,
+      "elapsed": 5.919744107988663,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740165/EFTA02740165.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "1de59d9cd02356f90ba6ba6835e23d5211439986a769496fda14dcfbaaf53376": {
+      "sha": "1de59d9cd02356f90ba6ba6835e23d5211439986a769496fda14dcfbaaf53376",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740172.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02740172.pdf",
+      "size": 788488,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 5,
+      "chars": 13405,
+      "elapsed": 10.572705733007751,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740172/EFTA02740172.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "f11823d22ba7b79a5fbb9de7512e283ea0cdaa595da7e500830218fb726d4d3c": {
+      "sha": "f11823d22ba7b79a5fbb9de7512e283ea0cdaa595da7e500830218fb726d4d3c",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740177.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02740177.pdf",
+      "size": 137973,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 2,
+      "chars": 1855,
+      "elapsed": 0.6679251909954473,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740177/EFTA02740177.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "e8eb58def43c4dc6fea7a84b32235a4abca3af95e5a999089b88cd7a129532d3": {
+      "sha": "e8eb58def43c4dc6fea7a84b32235a4abca3af95e5a999089b88cd7a129532d3",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740179.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02740179.pdf",
+      "size": 68849,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 1,
+      "chars": 894,
+      "elapsed": 0.6044710570713505,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740179/EFTA02740179.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "b24b2891bff2bac6f85e25bcc03ac52453bb9c19c7b00e6357ef17e44c314b9e": {
+      "sha": "b24b2891bff2bac6f85e25bcc03ac52453bb9c19c7b00e6357ef17e44c314b9e",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740180.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02740180.pdf",
+      "size": 529105,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 8,
+      "chars": 7827,
+      "elapsed": 1.8288149120053276,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740180/EFTA02740180.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "38ca52231f6b37bd91f4acad7d19c975ccabfc1489261788b357bc37645e9f04": {
+      "sha": "38ca52231f6b37bd91f4acad7d19c975ccabfc1489261788b357bc37645e9f04",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740188.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02740188.pdf",
+      "size": 2612299,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 26,
+      "chars": 54989,
+      "elapsed": 35.93329539790284,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740188/EFTA02740188.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "655db0f3a679dac9a6cc2a106555354fdd6a97ad2d667fe25ca04f39b19d3d31": {
+      "sha": "655db0f3a679dac9a6cc2a106555354fdd6a97ad2d667fe25ca04f39b19d3d31",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740214.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02740214.pdf",
+      "size": 511629,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 5,
+      "chars": 6662,
+      "elapsed": 3.4467990800039843,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740214/EFTA02740214.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "76354fba622733aaeb955c205b18779685443e26a554ad041bcc82c0f55f168e": {
+      "sha": "76354fba622733aaeb955c205b18779685443e26a554ad041bcc82c0f55f168e",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740219.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02740219.pdf",
+      "size": 87176,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 1,
+      "chars": 882,
+      "elapsed": 0.7092106869677082,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740219/EFTA02740219.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "935a9542e80c18c52475af4cb6872eee278a0586eba55f475d131d2edf8987bd": {
+      "sha": "935a9542e80c18c52475af4cb6872eee278a0586eba55f475d131d2edf8987bd",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740220.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02740220.pdf",
+      "size": 392962,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 4,
+      "chars": 5104,
+      "elapsed": 7.739396866061725,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740220/EFTA02740220.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "96d24461234e48692a17afb11f335e067f5a8294b8b1261fa3df5cc63abd4ce9": {
+      "sha": "96d24461234e48692a17afb11f335e067f5a8294b8b1261fa3df5cc63abd4ce9",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740224.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02740224.pdf",
+      "size": 757936,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 8,
+      "chars": 10432,
+      "elapsed": 4.093029043986462,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740224/EFTA02740224.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "0f163293c89739b4e7ebb73309f1f4ae4eb4203603d98bc99ed324701dff0af2": {
+      "sha": "0f163293c89739b4e7ebb73309f1f4ae4eb4203603d98bc99ed324701dff0af2",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740232.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02740232.pdf",
+      "size": 395126,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 4,
+      "chars": 4954,
+      "elapsed": 0.9851046520052478,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740232/EFTA02740232.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "3d5944a0ec78817461c92692112dbe8ecc7d7f63b48819c552b532b5deee755e": {
+      "sha": "3d5944a0ec78817461c92692112dbe8ecc7d7f63b48819c552b532b5deee755e",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740236.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02740236.pdf",
+      "size": 71467,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 1,
+      "chars": 748,
+      "elapsed": 0.7616881589638069,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740236/EFTA02740236.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "df7a2e302fc83ff955776d9fa6c77d909156d832a015e105da19fc20fe602eea": {
+      "sha": "df7a2e302fc83ff955776d9fa6c77d909156d832a015e105da19fc20fe602eea",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740237.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02740237.pdf",
+      "size": 607199,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 5,
+      "chars": 11075,
+      "elapsed": 22.895257258904167,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740237/EFTA02740237.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "fda92558e2b84a36389d9f27c6195a11260819015fbc9f9e378b174b0690e151": {
+      "sha": "fda92558e2b84a36389d9f27c6195a11260819015fbc9f9e378b174b0690e151",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740242.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02740242.pdf",
+      "size": 370552,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 3,
+      "chars": 3402,
+      "elapsed": 7.091667675995268,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740242/EFTA02740242.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "d763ff3ae5ed707148483f047bff3543c34c4d9c0933c2bed858e9270a614087": {
+      "sha": "d763ff3ae5ed707148483f047bff3543c34c4d9c0933c2bed858e9270a614087",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740245.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02740245.pdf",
+      "size": 475926,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 6,
+      "chars": 7987,
+      "elapsed": 0.9595393920317292,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740245/EFTA02740245.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "89db6067a4058cdfe672ab6f703b490fc05ea37e3c923f188a3a59e3c01f9ca2": {
+      "sha": "89db6067a4058cdfe672ab6f703b490fc05ea37e3c923f188a3a59e3c01f9ca2",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740251.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02740251.pdf",
+      "size": 741881,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 8,
+      "chars": 10105,
+      "elapsed": 1.512537128990516,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740251/EFTA02740251.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "172bc2e4cd032120d4f736106c9e128a0e733361fc0ffa740eca37ae143d7761": {
+      "sha": "172bc2e4cd032120d4f736106c9e128a0e733361fc0ffa740eca37ae143d7761",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740259.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02740259.pdf",
+      "size": 3661682,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 17,
+      "chars": 52780,
+      "elapsed": 17.592560708988458,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740259/EFTA02740259.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "30ecb7edec25625f22e1b3cc291271135e2d4eaeca434fc2117cd3daddc78d78": {
+      "sha": "30ecb7edec25625f22e1b3cc291271135e2d4eaeca434fc2117cd3daddc78d78",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740276.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02740276.pdf",
+      "size": 4342117,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 32,
+      "chars": 63949,
+      "elapsed": 14.015218805987388,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740276/EFTA02740276.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "5b1719dcb148006b674fbecf722abb767404ee7ca2b876bf03fb36eb7fa8e8b3": {
+      "sha": "5b1719dcb148006b674fbecf722abb767404ee7ca2b876bf03fb36eb7fa8e8b3",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740308.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02740308.pdf",
+      "size": 1042095,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 10,
+      "chars": 17181,
+      "elapsed": 1.6062564810272306,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740308/EFTA02740308.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "cf2518abb447cd77f0ff403ca451ce5dd718a318abb5642ecaaab105e03c78c1": {
+      "sha": "cf2518abb447cd77f0ff403ca451ce5dd718a318abb5642ecaaab105e03c78c1",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740318.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02740318.pdf",
+      "size": 152136,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 2,
+      "chars": 1814,
+      "elapsed": 0.743930576951243,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740318/EFTA02740318.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "80bb16daedaa32b6a3716e21fe3da6e2e9fa1745f5671a8f457ca21ad0ce5e3d": {
+      "sha": "80bb16daedaa32b6a3716e21fe3da6e2e9fa1745f5671a8f457ca21ad0ce5e3d",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740320.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02740320.pdf",
+      "size": 862845,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 9,
+      "chars": 10903,
+      "elapsed": 10.000867775990628,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740320/EFTA02740320.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "3f1ef096c01723be321395027037b9b839d8df403377483c49bd3b72d793001f": {
+      "sha": "3f1ef096c01723be321395027037b9b839d8df403377483c49bd3b72d793001f",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740329.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02740329.pdf",
+      "size": 397345,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 2,
+      "chars": 3413,
+      "elapsed": 7.04863906907849,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740329/EFTA02740329.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "965ffd5a84f890c9d05133fb361b13d985f09b097061c121ff13a2b5eff19254": {
+      "sha": "965ffd5a84f890c9d05133fb361b13d985f09b097061c121ff13a2b5eff19254",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740331.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02740331.pdf",
+      "size": 83164,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 1,
+      "chars": 916,
+      "elapsed": 0.7482181059895083,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740331/EFTA02740331.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "f65e32c3d37a7e922f29d913564e9c256bd0b9526d989135ccd5bb831d1ffbf0": {
+      "sha": "f65e32c3d37a7e922f29d913564e9c256bd0b9526d989135ccd5bb831d1ffbf0",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740332.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02740332.pdf",
+      "size": 207444,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 2,
+      "chars": 2277,
+      "elapsed": 5.698472406016663,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740332/EFTA02740332.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "ed06ddd503ce3b60bdfbbde1a1fa3fd2689c84bcbe9f1c4000f80b252d4fee2f": {
+      "sha": "ed06ddd503ce3b60bdfbbde1a1fa3fd2689c84bcbe9f1c4000f80b252d4fee2f",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740334.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02740334.pdf",
+      "size": 85629,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 1,
+      "chars": 928,
+      "elapsed": 0.7299094980116934,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-3-v-epstein/EFTA02740334/EFTA02740334.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    }
+  }
+}
\ No newline at end of file