MEMY-1805 marker2 court-redacted-v-epstein-80447 (salt 4090): 36/36

marker2/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732320/EFTA02732320.md

@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
+The JS 44 civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replace nor supplement the filing and service of pleadings or other papers as required by law, except as provided by local rules of court. This form, approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September 1974, is required for the use of the Clerk of Court for the purpose of initiating the civil docket sheet. (SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON THE REVERSE OF THE FORM.) **NOTICE: Attorneys MUST Indicate All Re-filed Cases Below.**
+
+**I. (a) PLAINTIFFS**
+
+C.L
+
+(b) County of Residence of First Listed Plaintiff
+
+(EXCEPT IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES)
+
+(c) Attorney's (Firm Name, Address, and Telephone Number)
+
+SPENCER T. KUVIN, ESQ.  
+LEOPOLD-KUVIN, P.A.  
+2925 PGA BLVD, SUITE 200  
+PALM BRACH GARDENS FL 33410
+
+**DEFENDANTS**
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN
+
+County of Residence of First Listed Defendant **US VIRGIN ISLANDS**  
+(IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES ONLY)
+
+NOTE: IN LAND CONDEMNATION CASES, USE THE LOCATION OF THE TRACT LAND INVOLVED.
+
+Attorneys (If Known)
+
+SEE ATTACHMENT
+
+(d) Check County Where Action Arose:  MIAMI-DADE  MONROE  BROWARD  PALM BEACH  ST. LUCIE  INDIAN RIVER  OKEECHOBEE  HIGHLANDS
+
+**II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION** (Place an "X" in One Box Only)
+
+ 1 U.S. Government Plaintiff  3 Federal Question (U.S. Government Not a Party)
+
+ 2 U.S. Government Defendant  4 Diversity (Indicate Citizenship of Parties in Item III)
+
+**III. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES** (Place an "X" in One Box for Plaintiff and One Box for Defendant)
+
+Citizen of This State  1  1 Incorporated or Principal Place of Business In This State  4  4
+
+Citizen of Another State  2  2 Incorporated and Principal Place of Business In Another State  5  5
+
+Citizen or Subject of a Foreign Country  3  3 Foreign Nation  6  6
+
+**IV. NATURE OF SUIT** (Place an "X" in One Box Only)
+
+| CONTRACT                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          | TORTS                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 | PERSONAL INJURY                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              | PERSONAL INJURY                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                | FOREIGN REPENALITY                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    | BANKRUPTCY                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      | OTHER STATUTES |
+|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|
+| <input type="checkbox"/> 110 Insurance<br><input type="checkbox"/> 120 Marine<br><input type="checkbox"/> 130 Act<br><input type="checkbox"/> 140 Negotiable Instrument<br><input type="checkbox"/> 150 Recovery of Overpayment & Enforcement of Judgment<br><input type="checkbox"/> 151 Medicare Act<br><input type="checkbox"/> 152 Recovery of Defaulted Student Loans (Excl. Veterans)<br><input type="checkbox"/> 153 Recovery of Overpayment of Veteran's Benefits<br><input type="checkbox"/> 160 Stockholders' Saits<br><input type="checkbox"/> 190 Other Contract<br><input type="checkbox"/> 195 Contract Product Liability<br><input type="checkbox"/> 196 Franchise | <input type="checkbox"/> 310 Airplane<br><input type="checkbox"/> 315 Airplane Product Liability<br><input checked="" type="checkbox"/> 320 Assault, Libel & Slander<br><input type="checkbox"/> 330 Federal Employers' Liability<br><input type="checkbox"/> 340 Marine<br><input type="checkbox"/> 345 Marine Product Liability<br><input type="checkbox"/> 350 Motor Vehicle<br><input type="checkbox"/> 355 Motor Vehicle Product Liability<br><input type="checkbox"/> 360 Other Personal Injury | <input type="checkbox"/> 362 Personal Injury - Med. Malpractice<br><input type="checkbox"/> 365 Personal Injury - Product Liability<br><input type="checkbox"/> 368 Asbestos Personal Injury Product Liability<br><input type="checkbox"/> 370 Other Fraud<br><input type="checkbox"/> 371 Truth in Lending<br><input type="checkbox"/> 380 Other Personal Property Damage<br><input type="checkbox"/> 385 Property Damage Product Liability | <input type="checkbox"/> 610 Agriculture<br><input type="checkbox"/> 620 Other Food & Drug<br><input type="checkbox"/> 625 Drug Related Seizure of Property 21 USC 881<br><input type="checkbox"/> 630 Liquor Laws<br><input type="checkbox"/> 640 R.R. & Truck<br><input type="checkbox"/> 650 Airline Regs.<br><input type="checkbox"/> 660 Occupational Safety/Health<br><input type="checkbox"/> 690 Other | <input type="checkbox"/> 422 Appeal 28 USC 158<br><input type="checkbox"/> 423 Withdrawal 28 USC 157<br><input type="checkbox"/> 620 Copyrights<br><input type="checkbox"/> 830 Patent<br><input type="checkbox"/> 840 Trademark<br><input type="checkbox"/> 850 Securities/Commodities/Exchange<br><input type="checkbox"/> 861 HIA (1395ff)<br><input type="checkbox"/> 862 Black Lung (923)<br><input type="checkbox"/> 863 DIWC/DIWW (405(g))<br><input type="checkbox"/> 864 SSID Title XVI<br><input type="checkbox"/> 865 RSI (405(g))<br><input type="checkbox"/> 740 Railway Labor Act<br><input type="checkbox"/> 790 Other Labor Litigation<br><input type="checkbox"/> 791 Empl. Ret. Inc. Security Act<br><input type="checkbox"/> 462 Naturalization Application<br><input type="checkbox"/> 463 Habeas Corpus-Atien Detainee<br><input type="checkbox"/> 465 Other Immigration Actions | <input type="checkbox"/> 875 Customer Challenge<br><input type="checkbox"/> 830 Economic Stabilization Act<br><input type="checkbox"/> 893 Environmental Matters<br><input type="checkbox"/> 894 Energy Allocation Act<br><input type="checkbox"/> 895 Freedom of Information Act<br><input type="checkbox"/> 900 Appeal of Fee Determination Under Equal Access to Justice<br><input type="checkbox"/> 950 Constitutionality of State Statutes |                |
+
+**V. ORIGIN** (Place an "X" in One Box Only)
+
+ 1 Original Proceeding  2 Removed from State Court  3 Re-filed-(see VI below)  4 Reinstated or Reopened  5 Transferred from another district (specify)  6 Multidistrict Litigation  7 Appeal to District Judge from Magistrate Judgment
+
+**VI. RELATED/RE-FILED CASE(S).**
+
+(See instructions second page): **JUDGE MARRA DOCKET NUMBER SEE ATTACHMENT**
+
+a) Re-filed Case  YES  NO b) Related Cases  YES  NO
+
+**VII. CAUSE OF ACTION** 18 U.S.C §2255 IN VIOLATION OF 18 U.S.C §2422 SEXUAL ASSAULT OF A MINOR  
+ LENGTH OF TRIAL via 5 days estimated (for both sides to try entire case)
+
+**VIII. REQUESTED IN COMPLAINT:**  CHECK IF THIS IS A CLASS ACTION UNDER F.R.C.P. 23 **DEMAND \$ CHECK YES only if demanded in complaint: JURY DEMAND:**  Yes  No
+
+# Service List
+
+Jack A. Goldberger, Esq. Attorney For: Jeffrey Epstein 250 Australian Avenue Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561) 659-8300 Fax: (561) 835-8691
+
+Bruce E. Reinhart, Esq. Attorney For: Jeffrey Epstein 250 Australian Avenue South Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561)202-6360 Fax: (561) 202.6976
+
+Robert D. Critton, Jr., Michael J. Pike Attorney For: Jeffrey Epstein 303 Banyon Boulevard Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561) 842-2820 Fax: (561) 844-6929
+
+Related Cases in Federal Court
+
+10-80309
+
+08-80811
+
+08-80069
+
+08-80119
+
+08-80232
+
+08-80380
+
+08-80381
+
+08-80993
+
+08-80994
+
+08-08804
+
+08-80811
+
+08-80893
+
+08-80469

marker2/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732320/EFTA02732320.metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,346 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732320.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 3,
+  "chars": 13182,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 22.34,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "CIVIL COVER SHEET",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            232.56,
+            28.35
+          ],
+          [
+            363.52799999999996,
+            28.35
+          ],
+          [
+            363.52799999999996,
+            40.5
+          ],
+          [
+            232.56,
+            40.5
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "I. (a) PLAINTIFFS",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            34.272,
+            76.14
+          ],
+          [
+            121.78800000000001,
+            76.14
+          ],
+          [
+            121.78800000000001,
+            86.67
+          ],
+          [
+            34.272,
+            86.67
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "DEFENDANTS",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            323.136,
+            76.94999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            391.68,
+            76.94999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            391.68,
+            86.67
+          ],
+          [
+            323.136,
+            86.67
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION (Place an \"X\" in One Box Only)",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            33.048,
+            218.70000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            165.24,
+            218.70000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            165.24,
+            229.23
+          ],
+          [
+            33.048,
+            229.23
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "III. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES (Place an \"X\" in One Box for Plaintiff and One Box for Defendant)",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            287.64,
+            218.70000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            593.64,
+            218.70000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            593.64,
+            238.95
+          ],
+          [
+            287.64,
+            238.95
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "IV. NATURE OF SUIT (Place an \"X\" in One Box Only)",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            31.212,
+            311.04
+          ],
+          [
+            226.44,
+            311.04
+          ],
+          [
+            226.44,
+            321.57000000000005
+          ],
+          [
+            31.212,
+            321.57000000000005
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "VI. RELATED/RE-FILED CASE(S).",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            29.375999999999998,
+            600.21
+          ],
+          [
+            143.82,
+            600.21
+          ],
+          [
+            143.82,
+            620.46
+          ],
+          [
+            29.375999999999998,
+            620.46
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Service List",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            277.236,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            343.7026062011719,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            343.7026062011719,
+            87.7330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            277.236,
+            87.7330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Related Cases in Federal Court",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            72.828,
+            109.35000000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            229.5,
+            109.35000000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            229.5,
+            124.74
+          ],
+          [
+            72.828,
+            124.74
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            497
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            216
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            65
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            14
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "Table",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            47
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            24
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02732320"
+  }
+}

marker2/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732323/EFTA02732323.md

@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
+AO 440 (Rev. 12/09) Summons in a Civil Action
+
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
+
+for the
+
+SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIE
+
+C.L.
+
+Plaintiff
+
+v.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN
+
+Defendant
+
+Civil Action No.
+
+## SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION
+
+To: (Defendant's name and address) JEFFREY EPSTEIN 358 EL BRILLO WAY PALM BEACH, FL 33480
+
+A lawsuit has been filed against you.
+
+Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 (aX2) or (3)— you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff's attorney, whose name and address are: SPENCER T. KUVIN, ESQ.
+
+LEOPOLD-KUVIN, P.A. 2925 PGA BOULEVARD, SUITE 200 PALM BEACH GARDENS, FL 33410 skuvin@leopoldkuvIn.com T: 561-515-1400 F: 561-515.1401
+
+If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. You also must file your answer or motion with the court.
+
+Date: 03/31/2010
+
+CLERK OF COURT
+
+Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk
+
+AO 440 (Rev. 12/09) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)
+
+Civil Action No.
+
+## PROOF OF SERVICE
+
+(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed IL Civ. P. 4 (I))
+
+This summons for (name of individual and title, if any) was received by me on (date)
+
+O I personally served the summons on the individual at (place) on (dote) ; or
+
+O I left the summons at the individual's residence or usual place of abode with (name) , a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there, on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual's last known address; or
+
+Date:
+
+O I served the summons on (name of individual) designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization) , who is on (date) ; Or
+
+O I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or
+
+O Other (specify):
+
+My fees are \$ for travel and \$ for services, for a total of \$ 0.00
+
+I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.
+
+Server's signature
+
+Printed name and title
+
+Server's address
+
+Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

marker2/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732323/EFTA02732323.metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,170 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732323.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 2,
+  "chars": 2302,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.3,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            179.316,
+            74.5809326171875
+          ],
+          [
+            444.9610900878906,
+            74.5809326171875
+          ],
+          [
+            444.9610900878906,
+            96.29827880859375
+          ],
+          [
+            179.316,
+            96.29827880859375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            228.88800000000003,
+            251.91
+          ],
+          [
+            392.932373046875,
+            251.91
+          ],
+          [
+            392.932373046875,
+            265.474609375
+          ],
+          [
+            228.88800000000003,
+            265.474609375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "PROOF OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            257.03999999999996,
+            97.28167724609375
+          ],
+          [
+            367.3848876953125,
+            97.28167724609375
+          ],
+          [
+            367.3848876953125,
+            110.4505615234375
+          ],
+          [
+            257.03999999999996,
+            110.4505615234375
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            64
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            32
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            18
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            66
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            16
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02732323"
+  }
+}

marker2/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732325/EFTA02732325.md

@@ -0,0 +1,140 @@
+#### THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Civil Action No.
+
+CASE NO:
+
+C.L.,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+#### COMPLAINT
+
+Plaintiff, C.L., brings this Complaint against defendant, Jeffery Epstein ("Defendant"), and states as follows:
+
+#### PARTIES, JURISDICTION, AND VENUE
+
+- 1. At all times material to this cause of action, Plaintiff was a resident of Palm Beach County, Florida.
+- 2. This Complaint is brought under a fictitious name to protect the identity of Plaintiff because this Complaint makes sensitive allegations of sexual assault and abuse of a then minor.
+- 3. At all times material to this cause of action, Defendant owned a residence located at 358 El Brillo Way, Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida.
+- 4. Defendant is presently a citizen of the United States Virgin Islands. Pursuant to the plea agreement entered by the Defendant in state court and the sentence which occurred on
+
+June 30, 2008, Defendant is currently under community control in Palm Beach County, Florida.
+
+- 5. Defendant is an adult male born on January 20, 1953.
+- 6. This Court has jurisdiction over this action and the claims set forth herein pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255.
+- 7. This Court has venue of this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b), as a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred in this District.
+
+## STATEMENT OF THE FACTS
+
+- 8. At all relevant times, Defendant was an adult male spanning the ages of 45 and 55 years old. Defendant is known as a billionaire financier and money manager with a secret clientele limited exclusively to billionaires. He is a man of tremendous wealth, power, and influence. He owns a fleet of airerafts that include a Gulfstream IV, a helicopter, and a Boeing 727, as well as a fleet of motor vehicles. Until his incarceration pursuant to the plea entered and sentencing, which occurred on June 30, 2008, he maintained his principal place of residence in the largest dwelling in Manhattan, a 51,000-square-foot eight-story mansion on the Upper East Side. He also owns a \$6.8 million mansion in Palm Beach, Florida, a \$30 million 7,500-acre ranch in New Mexico he named "Zorro," a 70-acre private island known as Little St. James in the U.S. Virgin Islands, a mansion in London's Westminster neighborhood, and another residence in the Avenue Foch area of Paris. The allegations herein concern Defendant's conduct while at his lavish residence in Palm Beach and numerous other locations both nationally and internationally.
+- 9. Defendant has a sexual preference for underage minor girls. He engaged in a plan, scheme, or enterprise in which he gained access to countless vulnerable and relatively
+
+economically disadvantaged minor girls, and sexually assaulted, molested, and/or exploited these girls, and then gave them money.
+
+- 10. Beginning in or around 1998 through in or around September 2007, Defendant used his resources and his influence over vulnerable minor girls to engage in a systematic pattern of sexually exploitative behavior.
+- 11. Defendant's plan and scheme reflected a particular pattern and method. Defendant coerced and enticed impressionable, vulnerable, and relatively economically less fortunate minor girls to participate in various acts of sexual misconduct that he committed upon them. Defendant's scheme involved the use of underage girls, as well as other individuals, to recruit underage girls. Defendant and/or an authorized agent would call and alert Defendant's assistants shortly before or after he arrived at his Palm Beach residence. His assistants would call economically disadvantaged and underage girls from West Palm Beach and surrounding areas who would be enticed by the money being offered and who Defendant and/or his assistants perceived as less likely to complain to authorities or have credibility issues if allegations of improper conduct were made. The then minor Plaintiff and other minor girls, some as young as 14 years old, were transported to Defendant's Palm Beach mansion by Defendant's employees, agents, and/or assistants in order to provide Defendant with "massages."
+- 12. Many of the instances of illegal sexual conduct committed by Defendant were perpetrated with the assistance, support, and facilitation of at least three assistants who helped him orchestrate this child exploitation enterprise. These assistants would arrange times for underage girls to come to Defendant's residence, transport or cause the transportation of underage girls to Defendant's residence, escort the underage girls to the massage room
+
+where Defendant would be waiting or would enter shortly thereafter, urge the underage girls to remove their clothes, deliver cash from Defendant to the underage girls and/or their procurers at the conclusion of each "massage appointment," and assist Defendant in taking nude photographs and/or videos of the underage girls with and/or without their knowledge. Defendant would pay the procurer of each girl's "appointment" hundreds of dollars.
+
+- 13. Defendant designed this scheme to secure a private place in Defendant's Palm Beach mansion where only persons employed and invited by Defendant would be present, so as to reduce the chance of detection of Defendant's sexual abuse and/or exploitation, as well as to make it more difficult for the minor girls to flee the premises and/or to credibly report his actions to law enforcement or other authorities. The girls were usually transported by his employee(s), agent(s), and/or assistant(s) and/or by taxicab(s) and/or motor vehicle(s) paid for by Defendant, which also made it difficult for the girls to flee his mansion.
+- 14. Upon her initial arrival at Defendant's Palm Beach mansion, each underage victim would generally be introduced to one of Defendant's assistants, who would gather the girl's personal contact information. The minor girl would be led up a remote flight of stairs to a room that contained a massage table and a large shower.
+- 15. At times, if it was the girl's first "massage" appointment, another female would be in the room to "lead the way." Generally the other female would leave, or Defendant would dismiss her. Often, Defendant would start his massage wearing only a small towel, which eventually would be removed. Defendant and/or the other female would direct the girl to massage him, giving the minor girl specific instructions as to where and how he wanted
+
+to be touched, and then direct her to remove her clothing. Defendant would then perform one or more lewd, lascivious, and sexual acts, including masturbation; fondling the minor's breasts and/or sexual organs; touching the minor's vulva, vagina, and/or anus with a vibrator, back massager, his finger(s), and/or his penis; digitally penetrating her vagina; performing intercourse, oral sex, and/or anal sex; and/or coercing or attempting to coerce the girl to engage in lewd acts and/or prostitution and/or enticing the then minor girls to engage in sexual acts with another female in Defendant's presence. The exact degree of the molestation and frequency with which the sexual exploitations took placed varied and is not yet completely known; however, Defendant committed such acts regularly on a daily basis and, in most instances, several times a day. In order to facilitate the daily exchanges of money for sexual assault and abuse, Defendant kept U.S. currency readily available.
+
+- 16. Defendant was particularly skillful at discerning his minor victims' respective hopes, dreams, and ambitions. As he did with many of his victims, Defendant and his associates lured Plaintiff early-on with modeling opportunities, impressing her with his modeling business and contacts with supermodels, indicating that they could help her with a modeling career.
+- 17. Consistent with the foregoing plan and scheme, Defendant used his money, wealth and power to unduly and improperly manipulate and influence the then minor Plaintiff.
+- 18. Plaintiff originally was introduced to Defendant when she was fifteen (15) years old. She was approached by a friend of hers in High School, who was also a victim of Epstein's scheme.
+
+- 19. Plaintiff was originally told that she would be going to Defendant's home to for a potential modeling job. Plaintiff went to Defendant's Palm Beach mansion accompanied by this other victim of Defendant. Upon arriving, Plaintiff was led up a flight of stairs to a room with a shower and a massage table. Defendant entered the room, instructed Plaintiff to massage him and proceeded to sexually molest the then minor Plaintiff.
+- 20. While confined in the bathroom with Defendant, Plaintiff was told by Defendant to undress. Plaintiff was then told to massage Defendant while he lay there naked, but for a small hand towel over his genitals.
+- 21. During this nude massage, Defendant touched Plaintiff's breasts and stroked her vagina with his fingers. Defendant masturbated during this naked massage while touching her vagina.
+- 22. Defendant then ejaculated into a towel. He then paid minor Plaintiff two hundred dollars, and Plaintiff was escorted out of Defendant's mansion and left Defendant's property.
+- 23. After this incident Defendant threatened Plaintiff "that if she told anyone what happened at his house bad things could happen."
+- 24. Over the course of the next several weeks a similar pattern of grooming continued and the sexual exploitation progressively escalated. One of Defendant's associations, M , approached the then minor Plaintiff. While at the mansion led the minor Plaintiff upstairs to Defendant's shower and massage room. Plaintiff was instructed to massage Defendant. While was initially present she soon left the then minor Plaintiff with the Defendant. Alone with the minor Plaintiff the Defendant seized upon this opportunity to persuade Plaintiff to take off her shirt. Once Defendant was able to exert influence over this minor Plaintiff he escalated his sexual
+
+exploitation. Without Plaintiff's consent the Defendant fondled her body parts including her vagina and breasts. Defendant proceeded to abuse the then minor Plaintiff with a vibrator, which he pushed onto her private parts. Defendant then penetrated the then minor Plaintiff's vagina with his fingers. After Defendant completed his sexual battery he paid the then minor Plaintiff and threatened her against telling any person, including the police and her parents, of what had occurred.
+
+- 25. After abusing the minor Plaintiff the Defendant or his associates would call the minor Plaintiff at her home. If the then minor Plaintiff did not answer the Defendant would take steps to fmd out where she was. Throughout the length and past the physical conclusion of Defendant's sexual exploitation of minor Plaintiff the Defendant and/or his associates would incessantly call Plaintiff. During some of these phone calls the Defendant or his associates would harass Plaintiff to recruit other minor girls threatening Plaintiff she would be in trouble if she did not.
+- 26. In June 2008, after an investigation by the Palm Beach Police Department, the State Attorney's Office, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the United States Attorney's Office, Defendant entered pleas of "guilty" to one count of solicitation of prostitution, in violation of Fla. Stat. § 796.07, and one count of solicitation of a minor to engage in prostitution, in violation of Fla. Stat. § 796.03 in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County, Florida.
+- 27. As a condition of that plea, Defendant entered into a Non-Prosecution Agreement, Addendum, and Affirmation (collectively, the "NPA") with the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida on September 24, 2007, October 29, 2007, and
+
+December 7, 2007, respectively. In so doing, Defendant acknowledged that Plaintiff was one of his victims and agreed to the following provisions of the NPA:
+
+8. If any of the (acknowledged victims] elects to file suit pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §2255, Epstein will not contest the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida over his person and/or the subject matter, and Epstein waives his right to contest liability and also waives his right to contest damages up to an amount agreed to between the identified individual and Epstein, so long as the identified individual elects to proceed exclusively under 18 U.S.C. §2255, and agrees to waive any other claim for damages, whether pursuant to state, federal or common law.
+
+10. Except as to those individuals who elect to proceed exclusively under 18 U.S.C. §2255, as set forth in paragraph (8), supra, neither Epstein's signature on this agreement, nor its terms, nor any resulting waivers or settlements by Epstein are to be construed as admissions of evidence or evidence of civil or criminal liability or a waive of any jurisdictional or other defense as to any person, whether or not her name appears on the list provided by the United States (emphasis added).
+
+28. Plaintiff was among the individuals identified by the United States Attorney's Office as victims of Defendant upon whose testimony it intended to base its federal prosecution of Defendant for his illegal conduct. Consequently, Defendant is estopped by his state Court plea and the Non-Prosecution Agreement in denying the acts alleged in this Complaint and must effectively admit liability to Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. 104.
+
+#### COUNT I Cause Of Action For Coercion And Enticement Of Minor To Engage In Prostitution Or Sexual Activity Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 In Violation Of 18 U.S.C. \$ 2422(b)
+
+29. Plaintiff hereby adopts, repeats, re-alleges, and incorporates by reference the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 22 above.
+
+30. Defendant used a facility or means of interstate and/or foreign commerce to knowingly persuade, induce, entice, or coerce Plaintiff, when she was under the age of 18 years, to engage in prostitution and/or sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense, or attempted to do so, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255 in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b).
+
+31. Plaintiff was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.0 § 2255, and, as such,
+
+asserts a cause of action against Defendant pursuant to this Section of the United States Code.
+
+32. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.0 § 2255 being committed against the then minor Plaintiff by Defendant, Plaintiff has in the past suffered, and will in the future continue to suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological and/or psychiatric trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, confusion, embarrassment, loss of educational opportunities, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy, separation from her family, and other damages associated with Defendant's manipulating and luring her into a perverse and unhealthy way of life. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses, and Plaintiff will in the future incur additional medical and psychological expenses. Plaintiff has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature, and Plaintiff will continue to suffer these losses in the future.
+
+WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment against Defendant for all damages available under 18 U.S.0 § 2255, including, without limitation, actual and compensatory damages, attorneys fees, costs of suit, and such other further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury.
+
+### COUNT TWO Cause Of Action For Sexual Exploitation Of Children Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 In Violation Of 18 U.S.C. 42251
+
+33. Plaintiff hereby adopts, repeats, re-alleges, and incorporates by reference the allegations contained in paragraphs l through 22 above.
+
+34. Defendant knowingly persuaded, induced, enticed, or coerced the then minor Plaintiff to engage in sexually explicit conduct for the purpose of producing a visual depiction of such conduct, in violation of 18 U.S.0 § 2251.
+
+35. Plaintiff was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255, and, as such, asserts a cause of action against Defendant pursuant to this Section of the United States Code.
+
+36. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 being committed against the then minor Plaintiff by Defendant, Plaintiff has in the past suffered, and will in the future continue to suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological and/or psychiatric trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, confusion, embarrassment, loss of educational opportunities, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy, separation from her family, and other damages associated with Defendant's manipulating and luring her into a perverse and unhealthy way of life. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses, and Plaintiff will in the future incur additional medical and psychological expenses. Plaintiff has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature, and Plaintiff will continue to suffer these losses in the future.
+
+WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment against Defendant for all damages available under 18 U.S.C. § 2255, including, without limitation, actual and compensatory damages, attorney's fees, costs of suit, and such other further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as of right by a jury.
+
+# COUNT THREE
+
+## Cause Of Action For Engaging In A Child Exploitation Enterprise Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. tt 2255 In Violation Of 18 U.S.C. 42252A (g)
+
+37. Plaintiff hereby adopts, repeats, re-alleges, and incorporates by reference the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 22 above and Counts One and Two above.
+
+38. Defendant knowingly engaged in a child exploitation enterprise, as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 2252A (g) (2), in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252A (g) (1). As more fully set forth above, Defendant engaged in actions that constitute countless violations of 18 U.S.C. § 1591 (sex trafficking of children), Chapter 110 (sexual exploitation of children in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2251, 2252(a) (1), and 2252(A) (a) (1)), and Chapter 117 (transportation for illegal sexual activity in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2421, 2422(b), and 2423(b)). As more fully set forth above in paragraphs 1 through 22, Defendant's actions involved countless victims and countless separate incidents of sexual abuse, which he committed against minors, including Plaintiff, in concert with at least three other persons.
+
+39. Plaintiff was a victim of one or more offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255, and, as such, asserts a cause of action against Defendant pursuant to this Section of the United States Code.
+
+40. As a direct and proximate result of the offenses enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2255 being committed against the then minor Plaintiff by Defendant, Plaintiff has in the past suffered, and will in the future continue to suffer, physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress, psychological and/or psychiatric trauma, mental anguish, humiliation, confusion, embarrassment, loss of educational opportunities, loss of self-esteem, loss of dignity, invasion of her privacy, separation from her family, and other damages associated with Defendant's manipulating and luring her into a perverse and unhealthy way of life. The then minor Plaintiff incurred medical and psychological expenses, and Plaintiff will in the future incur additional medical and psychological expenses. Plaintiff has suffered a loss of income, a loss of the capacity to earn income in the future, and a loss of the capacity to enjoy life. These injuries are permanent in nature, and Plaintiff will continue to suffer these losses in the future.
+
+WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment against Defendant for all damages available under 18 U.S.C. § 2255, including, without limitation, actual and compensatory damages, attorney's fees, costs of suit, and such other further relief as this Court deems just and proper, and hereby demands trial by jury on all issues triable as a matter of right.
+
+## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
+
+I hereby certify that on March 31, 2010, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record or pro se parties identified on the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those counsel or parties who are not authorized to receive electronically.
+
+s/GREGORY S. WEISS
+
+SPENCER T. KUVIN (Florida Bar No.: 089737))
+
+skuvin@leopoldkuvin.com
+
+GREGORY S. WEISS (Florida Bar No.: 163430)
+
+gweissAleopoldkuvin.com
+
+Leopold—Kuvin, P.A.
+
+2925 PGA Boulevard, Suite 200
+
+Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410
+
+Telephone: (561) 515-1400
+
+Facsimile: (561) 515-1401
+
+Attorneys for Plaintiff

marker2/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732325/EFTA02732325.metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,716 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732325.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 12,
+  "chars": 21274,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.72,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nFOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA \nCivil Action No.",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            184.212,
+            72.08999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            453.7564392089844,
+            72.08999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            453.7564392089844,
+            113.9830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            184.212,
+            113.9830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "COMPLAINT",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            270.504,
+            337.77
+          ],
+          [
+            349.90594482421875,
+            337.77
+          ],
+          [
+            349.90594482421875,
+            352.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            270.504,
+            352.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "PARTIES, JURISDICTION, AND VENUE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            194.61599999999999,
+            421.20000000000005
+          ],
+          [
+            424.0322265625,
+            421.20000000000005
+          ],
+          [
+            424.0322265625,
+            435.7330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            194.61599999999999,
+            435.7330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "STATEMENT OF THE FACTS",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            235.00799999999998,
+            265.68
+          ],
+          [
+            406.8049011230469,
+            265.68
+          ],
+          [
+            406.8049011230469,
+            281.2330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            235.00799999999998,
+            281.2330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "COUNT I \nCause Of Action For Coercion And Enticement Of Minor To Engage In Prostitution Or \nSexual Activity Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 In Violation Of 18 U.S.C. $ 2422(b)",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            82.00800000000001,
+            439.83000000000004
+          ],
+          [
+            537.830322265625,
+            439.83000000000004
+          ],
+          [
+            537.830322265625,
+            483.363037109375
+          ],
+          [
+            82.00800000000001,
+            483.363037109375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "COUNT TWO \nCause Of Action For Sexual Exploitation Of Children Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. 4 2255 In \nViolation Of 18 U.S.C. 42251",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            87.51599999999999,
+            537.84
+          ],
+          [
+            539.6719360351562,
+            537.84
+          ],
+          [
+            539.6719360351562,
+            582.8035125732422
+          ],
+          [
+            87.51599999999999,
+            582.8035125732422
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "COUNT THREE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 9,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            263.772,
+            596.97
+          ],
+          [
+            358.6024169921875,
+            596.97
+          ],
+          [
+            358.6024169921875,
+            613.4830169677734
+          ],
+          [
+            263.772,
+            613.4830169677734
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Cause Of Action For Engaging In A Child Exploitation Enterprise Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. tt \n2255 In Violation Of 18 U.S.C. 42252A (g)",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 9,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            72.828,
+            609.9300000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            548.8609008789062,
+            609.9300000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            548.8609008789062,
+            641.2230072021484
+          ],
+          [
+            72.828,
+            641.2230072021484
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 11,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            229.5,
+            208.17000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            394.8902587890625,
+            208.17000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            394.8902587890625,
+            223.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            229.5,
+            223.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            47
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            24
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            49
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            54
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            49
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            67
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            34
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            55
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 9,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            54
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 10,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 11,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            14
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02732325"
+  }
+}

marker2/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732337/EFTA02732337.md

@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
+AO 440 (Rev. 12(09) Summons in a Civil Action
+
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
+
+for the
+
+SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIE
+
+C.L.
+
+Plaintiff
+
+v.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN
+
+Defendant
+
+) ) ) ) ) )
+
+) Civil Action No. 10-80447-CV-MARRA/JOHNSON
+
+## SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION
+
+To: (Defendant's name and address) JEFFREY EPSTEIN 358 EL BRILLO WAY PALM BEACH, FL 33480
+
+A lawsuit has been filed against you.
+
+Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 (aX2) or (3)— you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff's attorney, whose name and address are: SPENCER T. KUVIN, ESQ.
+
+LEOPOLD-KUVIN, P.A. 2925 PGA BOULEVARD, SUITE 200 PALM BEACH GARDENS, FL 33410 skuvin@leopoldkuvIn.com T: 561-515-1400 F: 561-515.1401
+
+If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. You also must file your answer or motion with the court.
+
+Date: 03/31/2010
+
+![](_page_0_Picture_19.jpeg)
+
+Steven M. Larimore Clerk of Court
+
+SUMMONS
+
+s/Jose Conway Deputy Clerk U.S. District Courts
+
+Civil Action No. 10-80447-CV-MARRa
+
+## PROOF OF SERVICE
+
+(This section should not be pled with the court unless required by Fed R. CAP. P. 4 (0)
+
+This summons for (name of individual and title, Van)) was received by me on (dare)
+
+Date:
+
+O I personally served the summons on the individual at (place) on (date) ; or O I left the summons at the individual's residence or usual place of abode with (name) , a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there, on (dale) , and mailed a copy to the individual's last known address; or O I served the summons on (name of individual) designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization) O 1 returned the summons unexecuted because in Other (specify): , who is on (dale) ; Or ; or
+
+My fees are \$ for travel and \$ for services, for a total of \$ 0.00
+
+I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.
+
+Server's signature
+
+Printed name and tide
+
+Server's address
+
+Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

marker2/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732337/EFTA02732337.metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,180 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732337.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 2,
+  "chars": 2368,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.23,
+  "image_assets": [
+    "_page_0_Picture_19.jpeg"
+  ],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            179.316,
+            74.1243896484375
+          ],
+          [
+            445.09130859375,
+            74.1243896484375
+          ],
+          [
+            445.09130859375,
+            96.427734375
+          ],
+          [
+            179.316,
+            96.427734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            228.88800000000003,
+            251.91
+          ],
+          [
+            392.932373046875,
+            251.91
+          ],
+          [
+            392.932373046875,
+            265.474609375
+          ],
+          [
+            228.88800000000003,
+            265.474609375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "PROOF OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            257.652,
+            97.19999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            367.3848876953125,
+            97.19999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            367.3848876953125,
+            110.4505615234375
+          ],
+          [
+            257.652,
+            110.4505615234375
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            85
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            42
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            19
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Picture",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            67
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02732337"
+  }
+}

marker2/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732339/EFTA02732339.md

@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO. I 0-80447-CIV-MARRA
+
+C.L.,
+
+Plaintiff, vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendants.
+
+## ORDER REQUIRING COUNSEL TO CONFER, FILE JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT AND FILE JOINT DISCOVERY REPORT
+
+THIS ORDER has been entered upon the filing of the complaint. Plaintiff's counsel is hereby ORDERED to forward to all defendants, upon receipt of either an answer or a motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. I2(b), a copy of this order.
+
+It is further ORDERED:
+
+- I. Every motion when filed shall be accompanied by a proposed order, except that motions to dismiss and motions for summary judgment need not be accompanied by a proposed order.
+- 2. Pretrial discovery in this case shall be conducted in accord with Local Rule 26.1 and Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
+- 3. Pursuant to Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, unless this action is excluded under Rule 26(aXB), the parties must confer within twenty-one (21) days after the last responding party either files an answer or a motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b), whichever is earlier, to consider the nature and basis of their claims and defenses and the possibilities for a prompt settlement or resolution of the case, to make or arrange for the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)( I ), and to develop a proposed discovery plan that indicates the parties' views and
+
+proposals concerning the matters listed in Rule 26(f).
+
+4. The parties are jointly responsible for submitting a written report of this conference outlining the proposed discovery plan within 14 days after the conference.
+
+5. Counsel for the parties shall hold a scheduling conference either at the same time as the discovery conference described in Rule 26(f) or within fourteen (14) calendar days thereafter. See Local Rule 16.1(B).
+
+6. Within fourteen (14) days of the scheduling conference, counsel shall file a joint scheduling report pursuant to Local Rule 16.1(B)(2)&(3). This report shall indicate the proposed month and year for the trial plus the estimated number of trial days required, as well as an indication of whether the trial is to be a jury trial or bench trial.
+
+7. The parties may submit a single report combining the discovery plan report and the scheduling conference report.
+
+8. Failure of counsel or unrepresented parties to file a discovery plan report or joint scheduling report may result in dismissal, default, and the imposition of other sanctions including attorney's fees and costs.
+
+DONE AND SIGNED in at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 31" day of March, 2010.
+
+> /en KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge
+
+Copies furnished to:
+
+All counsel

marker2/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732339/EFTA02732339.metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,151 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732339.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 2,
+  "chars": 2700,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 0.74,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            206.856,
+            57.50999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            405.5581359863281,
+            57.50999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            405.5581359863281,
+            86.9830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            206.856,
+            86.9830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "ORDER REQUIRING COUNSEL TO CONFER, FILE JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT \nAND FILE JOINT DISCOVERY REPORT",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            72.216,
+            269.73
+          ],
+          [
+            540.4690551757812,
+            269.73
+          ],
+          [
+            540.4690551757812,
+            299.6030578613281
+          ],
+          [
+            72.216,
+            299.6030578613281
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02732339"
+  }
+}

marker2/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732341/EFTA02732341.md

@@ -0,0 +1,422 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO. 10-80447-CIV
+
+C.L.,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT & TO STRIKE, & TO DISMISS DIRECTED TO COUNT III OF PLAINTIFF C.L.'S COMPLAINT ID.E. 1, dated 3/31/2010j
+
+Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, ("EPSTEIN"), by and through his undersigned counsel, files this Motion For More Definite Statement & Strike, and Motion to Dismiss Count ❑I Directed To Plaintiff C.L.'s Complaint. Rule 12(b)(6), Rule 12(e) and (f), Fed.R.Civ.P. (2010); Local Gen. Rule 7.1 (S.D. Fla. 2009). In support of his motion, Defendant states:
+
+The Complaint attempts to allege 3 counts, all of which are purportedly brought pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §2255 — Civil Remedies for Personal Injuries. Defendant seeks more definite statement of the precise time period during which the alleged conduct by EPSTEIN involving Plaintiff occurred, and seeks more definite statement as to C.L.'s date of birth so he can determine when she was no longer a minor. Plaintiff's complaint fails to state even these rudimentary facts. As discussed more fully below herein, when EPSTEIN's alleged conduct involving C.L. occurred determines what version of 18 U.S.C. §2255 applies to this action.
+
+To be clear, Defendant recognizes that pursuant to the NPA (Non-Prosecution Agreement) he cannot challenge the standing of Plaintiff to bring an action exclusively under 18 U.S.C. §2255 or raise certain defenses as long as the action is brought exclusively under 18 U.S.C. §2255. In addition, EPSTEIN pursuant to the NPA does not contest this Court's jurisdiction and waives liability as required by paragraph 8 of the NPA as to a predicate act or acts under §2255. However, the NPA does not prevent Defendant from asserting what version of 18 U.S.C. §2255 applies for purposes of establishing a minimum statutory damage recovery and whether one of the three specified predicate acts which was enacted subsequent to the completion of the defendant's alleged offense conduct with allegedly injured the plaintiff can be applied in the face of constitutional ex post facto prohibitions to criminal offenses that were not in effect at the time of the conduct at issue. See footnote 1 herein regarding EPSTEIN's obligation to honor the terms of the NPA.
+
+To the extent that the conduct alleged by Plaintiff occurred prior to July 27, 2006, Count III is subject to dismissal because the predicate act relied upon by Plaintiff for her claims did not come into effect until July 27, 2006. Defendant's attorneys are 100% certain that Plaintiff, in being required to assert basic pleading requirement of time for the alleged acts, will allege that the conduct took place prior to July 27, 2006. Defendant notes that through his undersigned counsel's review of The Town of Palm Beach Police Department file produced in discovery that C.L. was meeting with the police in December of 2005; that C.L.'s date of birth is April of 1988 (thus 18 and not a minor as of the time of the enactment of the predicate offense upon which Count III is based); and that she claimed she was at Defendant's home in 2004. By the Court requiring that Plaintiff plead such allegations, Plaintiff will determine that she has no cause of action in Count III as a matter of law. While this court obviously has not yet ruled on the Motion
+
+for More Definite Statement, Defendant is presenting his argument to Count III knowing that Plaintiff can and should concede the missing elements of "time" and birth month and year in her response.
+
+# Supporting Memorandum of Law
+
+# Motion For More Definite Statement and To Strike, Rule 12(e) and (0, F.R.C.P.
+
+Plaintiff alleges that "beginning in or around 1998 through in or around September 2007, Defendant used his resources and his influence over vulnerable minor girls to engage in a systematic pattern of sexually exploitative behavior." (Complaint, ¶10). C.L. further alleges that she "originally introduced to Defendant when she was fifteen (15) years old." (Id, ¶18). There are no allegations in the Complaint as to Plaintiff's date of birth or as to the time period during which the alleged conduct by EPSTEIN involving C.L. occurred. Such allegations are critical as it determines what version of 18 U.S.C. §2255 applies to this action. As discussed more fully below herein, 18 U.S.C. was amended, effective July 27, 2006.
+
+Defendant also seeks to strike and more definitely state ¶¶8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15, such that the allegations pertain to C.L. and not other alleged victims or what EPSTEIN's alleged conduct was with respect to other alleged victims. Such allegations are immaterial and impertinent as they are not related to Plaintiff's C.L.'s claim. Plaintiff should allege those facts that specifically pertain to her. Not until 116 does Plaintiff assert allegations pertaining to her and the conduct of Defendant directly involving her. What EPSTEIN may or may not have allegedly done with respect to other females does not affect Plaintiff's claim brought pursuant to §2255.
+
+The same lawyers that represent Plaintiff C.L. also represent Plaintiff B.B. in action filed against EPSTEIN in state court — Case No. 502008CA037319XXXXMB AB, 15th Judicial Circuit Court, in for Palm Beach County, State of Florida. It appears that Plaintiff's counsel carelessly used the B.B. complaint as a template for this action even though different causes of action are asserted therein. At one time, the B.B. action attempted to include a Florida RICO claim which has now been voluntarily dismissed; Plaintiff's counsel by including allegations as to other Plaintiffs and other alleged "girls" was attempting to improperly assert a RICO claim in B.B. (Such immaterial and impertinent allegations in the B.B. case are also the subject of a motion to strike). Reference to a scheme, pattern, and plan are immaterial and impertinent to C.L.'s claim. Plaintiff is not allowed to argue other alleged Plaintiff's cases. The C.L. action is brought exclusively under 18 U.S.C. §2255. The allegations in ¶¶8-15 are not related to the elements of Plaintiff's §2255 claim and, thus, are required to be stricken and/or replead to more definitely state the alleged facts specific to C.L.
+
+# Motion to Dismiss Count III
+
+Because EPSTEIN's conduct occurred prior to July 27, 2006, and Plaintiff is relying on a statutory predicate act that was not enacted until after Jul. 27, 2006, Count III is required to be dismissed. I
+
+Plaintiff is relying on a criminal predicate act, 18 U.S.C. §2252A(g) that was not even in existence at the time of the alleged conduct by EPSTEIN directed to C.L. which would clearly violate the Ex Post Facto Clause of the U.S. Constitution. As noted above, Defendant is certain that when Plaintiff is required to more definitely state her claim and
+
+I EPSTEIN will fully honor his obligations as set forth in the Non-Prosecution Agreement with the United States Attorney's Office; principally, as related to the claims made in this case by C.L., the obligations as set forth in paragraph 8 of that Agreement. In particular, EPSTEIN will not contest the allegation that he committed at least one predicate offense as alleged by C.L.
+
+allege facts as to time and conduct/acts specific to her, the date of the acts alleged will be prior to July 27, 2006, and thus, Defendant will argue his position based on the fact that no alleged conduct by EPSTEIN involving C.L. occurred on or after July 27, 2006. Additionally and equally important, as of July 27, 2006, C.L. would be 18 and no longer a minor at the time 18 U.S.C. §2255A(g) was enacted. Plaintiff in her response can and should concede this issue.
+
+There is no language in the statute which suggests (g) is to apply retroactively. It is well settled that in interpreting a statute, the court's inquiry begins with the plain and unambiguous language of the statutory text. CBS, Inc. v. Prime Time 24 Venture, 245 F.3d 1217 (11th Cir. 2001); U.S. v. Castroneves, 2009 WL 528251, \*3 (S.D. Fla. 2009), citing Reeves v. Astrue, 526 F.3d 732, 734 (11th Cir. 2008); and v. Husband, 376 F.Supp.2d at 610 ("When interpreting a statute, [a court's] inquiry begins with the text."). "The Court must first look to the plain meaning of the words, and scrutinize the statute's `language, structure, and purpose.'" Id. In addition, in construing a statute, a court is to presume that the legislature said what it means and means what it said, and not add language or give some absurd or strained interpretation. As stated in CBS. Inc. supra at 1228 — "Those who ask courts to give effect to perceived legislative intent by interpreting statutory language contrary to its plain and unambiguous meaning are in effect asking courts to alter that language, and `[c]ourts have no authority to alter statutory language.... We cannot add to the terms of [the] provision what Congress left out.' Merritt, 120 F.3d at 1187." See also Dodd v. U.S., 125 S.Ct. 2478 (2005); 73 Am.Jur.2d Statutes §124.
+
+Title 18 of the U.S.C. is entitled "Crimes and Criminal Procedure." §2255 is contained in "Part I. Crimes, Chap. 110. Sexual Exploitation and Other Abuse of Children." 18 U.S.C. §2255 (2002)2, is entitled Civil remedy for personal injuries, and provides:
+
+- (a) Any minor who is a victim of a violation of section 2241(c), 2242, 2243, 2251, 2251A, 2252, 2252A, 2260, 2421, 2422, or 2423 of this title and who suffers personal injury as a result of such violation may sue in any appropriate United States District Court and shall recover the actual damages such minor sustains and the cost of the suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee. Any minor as described in the preceding sentence shall be deemed to have sustained damages of no less than \$50,000 in value.
+- (b) Any action commenced under this section shall be barred unless the complaint is filed within six years after the right of action first accrues or in the case of a person under a legal disability, not later than three years after the disability.
+
+See endnote I hereto for statutory text as amended in 2006, effective July 27, 2006. Prior to the 2006 amendments, the version of the statute quoted above was in effect beginning in 1999.1 The amended version of §2255 significantly changed subsection (a) such that it now reads —
+
+- (a) In general.--Any person who, while a minor, was a victim of a violation of section 2241(c), 2242, 2243, 2251, 2251A, 2252, 2252A, 2260, 2421, 2422, or 2423 of this title and who suffers personal injury as a result of such violation, regardless of whether the injury occurred while such person was a minor, may sue in any appropriate United States District Court and shall recover the actual damages such person sustains and the cost of the suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee. Any person as described in the preceding sentence shall be deemed to have sustained damages of no less than 5150,000 in value.
+
+(Emphasis added to highlight the changes to the statute effective July 27, 2006).
+
+In Count Ili of her Complaint, she alleges that Defendant "knowingly engaged in a child exploitation enterprise, as defined in 18 U.S.C. §2252A(g)(2), in violation of 18 U.S.C. §2252A(g)(1)." §2252A is one of the specified criminal predicate acts under 18
+
+<sup>2</sup> The above quoted version of 18 §2255 was the same beginning in 1999 until amended in 2006, effective July 27, 2006.
+
+U.S.C. §2255. However, subsection (g) of §2252 was not added to §2252 until July, 2006. In attempting to assert a claim pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §2255, Plaintiff is relying on subsection, (g)(1) and (2), of the criminal statute 18 U.S.C. §2252A as the requisite predicate act. Subsection (g) of §2252A was enacted in 2006, effective July 27, 2006. See 2006 Amendments; Pub.L. 109-248, § 701, added subsec. (g). 18 U.S.C.A. § 2252A. If the alleged conduct by EPSTEIN directed to C.L. occurred prior to the effective date of the statute, reliance on subsection (g) violates the well entrenched constitutional principles against retroactivity, and, thus, Count III is required to be dismissed. If the acts occurred only after July 27, 2006 (which Defendant's attorney know cannot be true), C.L. would be 18 and not a minor, so the statute would have no application.
+
+Pre-July, 2006, 18 U.S.C. §2252A contained no subsection (g) as relied on by Plaintiff.2 See endnote 2 hereto for complete statutory text of 18 U.S.C. §2252A (2004), and as amended effective, July 26, 2006. Subsection (g) which did not exist at the time of Defendant's alleged conduct now criminalizes the following conduct —
+
+(g) Child exploitation enterprises.—
+
+(1) Whoever engages in a child exploitation enterprise shall be fined under this title and imprisoned for any term of years not less than 20 or for life.
+
+(2) A person engages in a child exploitation enterprise for the purposes of this section if the person violates section 1591, section 1201 if the victim is a minor, or chapter 109A (involving a minor victim), 110 (except for sections 2257 and 2257A), or 117 (involving a minor victim), as a part of a series of felony violations constituting three or more separate incidents and involving more than one victim, and commits those offenses in concert with three or more other persons.
+
+See endnote 2 hereto.
+
+It is an axiom of law that "retroactivity is not favored in the law." Bowen, 488 U.S., at 208, 109 S.Ct., at 471 (1988). As eloquently stated in Landeraf v. USI Film Products, 114 S.Ct. 1483, 1497, 511 U.S. 244, 265-66 (1994):
+
+... the presumption against retroactive legislation is deeply rooted in our jurisprudence, and embodies a legal doctrine centuries older than our Republic. Elementary considerations of fairness dictate that individuals should have an opportunity to know what the law is and to conform their conduct accordingly; settled expectations should not be lightly disrupted.<sup>FN18</sup> For that reason, the “principle that the legal effect of conduct should ordinarily be assessed under the law that existed when the conduct took place has timeless and universal appeal.” *Kaiser*, 494 U.S., at 855, 110 S.Ct., at 1586 (SCALIA, J., concurring). In a free, dynamic society, creativity in both commercial and artistic endeavors is **fostered by a rule of law that gives people confidence about the legal consequences of their actions.**
+
+FN18. See *General Motors Corp. v. Romein*, 503 U.S. 181, 191, 112 S.Ct. 1105, 1112, 117 L.Ed.2d 328 (1992) (“Retroactive legislation presents problems of unfairness that are more serious than those posed by prospective legislation, because it can deprive citizens of legitimate expectations and upset settled transactions”); [Further citations omitted].
+
+It is therefore not surprising that the antiretroactivity principle finds expression in several provisions of our Constitution. **The Ex Post Facto Clause flatly prohibits retroactive application of penal legislation.**<sup>FN19</sup> Article I, § 10, cl. 1, prohibits States from passing another type of retroactive legislation, laws “impairing the Obligation of Contracts.” The Fifth Amendment’s Takings Clause prevents the Legislature (and other government actors) from depriving private persons of vested property rights except for a “public use” and upon payment of “just compensation.” The prohibitions on “Bills of Attainder” in Art. I, §§ 9-10, **prohibit legislatures from singling out disfavored persons and meting out summary punishment for past conduct.** See, *e.g.*, *United States v. [REDACTED]*, 381 U.S. 437, 456-462, 85 S.Ct. 1707, 1719-1722, 14 L.Ed.2d 484 (1965). **The Due Process Clause also protects the interests in fair notice and repose that may be compromised by retroactive legislation; a justification sufficient to validate a statute’s prospective application under the Clause “may not suffice” to warrant its retroactive application.** *Usery v. Turner Elkhorn Mining Co.*, 428 U.S. 1, 17, 96 S.Ct. 2882, 2893, 49 L.Ed.2d 752 (1976).
+
+FN19. Article I contains two *Ex Post Facto* Clauses, one directed to Congress (§ 9, cl. 3), the other to the States (§ 10, cl. 1). We have construed the Clauses as applicable only to penal legislation. See *Calder v. Bull*, 3 Dall. 386, 390-391, 1 L.Ed. 648 (1798) (opinion of Chase, J.).
+
+These provisions demonstrate that retroactive statutes raise particular concerns. The Legislature’s unmatched powers allow it to sweep away settled expectations suddenly and without individualized consideration. Its responsivity to political pressures poses a risk that it may be tempted to use retroactive legislation as a means of retribution against unpopular groups or individuals. As Justice Marshall observed in his opinion for \*\*1498 the Court in *Weaver v.*
+
+Graham, 450 U.S. 24, 101 S.Ct. 960, 67 L.Ed.2d 17 (1981), the Ex Post Facto Clause not only ensures that individuals have "fair warning" about the effect of criminal statutes, but also "restricts governmental power by restraining arbitrary and potentially vindictive legislation." Id, at 28-29, 101 S.Ct., at 963-964 (citations omitted). Ft42°
+
+FN20. See Richmond v. J. A. Croson Co., 488 U.S. 469, 513-514, 109 S.Ct. 706, 732, 102 L.Ed.2d 854 (1989) ("Legislatures are primarily policymaking bodies that promulgate rules to govern future conduct. The constitutional prohibitions against the enactment of ex post facto laws and bills of attainder reflect a valid concern about the use of the political process to punish or characterize past conduct of private citizens. It is the judicial system, rather than the legislative process, that is best equipped to identify past wrongdoers and to fashion remedies that will create the conditions that presumably would have existed had no wrong been committed") (STEVENS, J., concurring in part and concurring in judgment); James v. United States, 366 U.S. 213, 247, n. 3, 81 S.Ct. 1052, 1052, n. 3, 6 L.Ed.2d 246 (1961) (retroactive punitive measures may reflect "a purpose not to prevent dangerous conduct generally but to impose by legislation a penalty against specific persons or classes of persons").
+
+These well entrenched constitutional protections and presumptions against retroactive application of legislation establish that 18 U.S.C. §2252A in effect at the time of the alleged conduct apply to the instant action, not the amended version which added subsection (g).
+
+Not only is there no clear express intent stating that the statute is to apply retroactively, but even if there were such an intent (which does not exist), applying a later version of the statute would be in clear violation of the Ex Post Facto Clause of the United States Constitution as it would be applied to events occurring before its enactment and would increase the penalty or punishment for the alleged crime. U.S. Const. Art. 1, §9, cl. 3, §10, cl. 1. U.S. v. Seigel, 153 F.3d 1256 (11th Cir. 1998); U.S. v. 162 F.3d 87 (3d Cir. 1998); and generally, Calder v. Bull, 3 U.S. 386, 390, 1 L.Ed. 648, 1798 WL 587 (Calder) (1798).
+
+The United States Constitution provides that "[n]o Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed" by Congress. U.S. Const. art. I, § 9, cl. 3. A law violates the Ex Post Facto Clause if it " `appliles] to events occurring before its enactment ... land] disadvantagels] the offender affected by it' by altering the definition of criminal conduct or increasing the punishment for the crime." Lynce v. Mathis, 519 U.S. 433, 117 S.Ct. 891, 137 L.Ed.2d 63 (1997) (quoting Weaver v. Graham, 450 U.S. 24, 29, 101 S.Ct. 960, 67 L.Ed.2d 17 (1981)).
+
+U.S. v. Siege1,153 F.3d 1256, 1259 (11th Cir. 1998). (Empasis added to above quotations).
+
+The statute, as amended in 2006, contains no language stating that the application of subsection (g) is to be retroactive. Thus, there is no manifest intent that the statute is to apply retroactively, and, accordingly, the statute in effect during the time of the alleged conduct is to apply. Landgraf v. USI Film Products, supra, at 1493, ("A statement that a statute will become effective on a certain date does not even arguably suggest that it has any application to conduct that occurred at an earlier date."). Here the statute, by adding subsection (g), clearly alters the definition of the criminal conduct.
+
+The cases of U.S. v. Siegel, supra (11th Cir. 1998), and U.S. v. supra (3d Cir. 1998), support Defendant's position that application of the current version of 18 U.S.C. §2252A would be in clear violation of the Ex Post Facto Clause. In Siegel, the Eleventh Circuit found that the Ex Post Facto Clause barred application of the Mandatory Victim Restitution Act of 1996 (MVRA) to the defendant whose criminal conduct occurred before the effective date of the statute, 18 U.S.C. §3664(f)(1)(A), even though the guilty plea and sentencing proceeding occurred after the effective date of the statute. On July 19, 1996, the defendant Siegel pleaded guilty to various charges under 18 U.S.C. §371 and §1956(a)(1)(A), (conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud, bank fraud, and laundering of money instruments; and money laundering). He was sentenced on March 7, 1997. As part of his sentence, Siegel was ordered to pay \$1,207,000.00 in restitution under the MVRA which became effective on April 24, 1996. Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214, 1229-1236. The 1996 amendments to MVRA required that the district court must order restitution in the full amount of the victim's loss without consideration of the defendant's ability to pay. Prior to the enactment of the MVRA and under the former 18 U.S.C. §3664(a) of the Victim and Witness Protection Act of 1982 (VWPA), Pub.l. No. 97-291, 96 Stat. 1248, the court was required to consider, among other factors, the defendant's ability to pay in determining the amount of restitution.
+
+When the MVRA was enacted in 1996, Congress stated that the amendments to the VWPA "shall, to the extent constitutionally permissible, be effective for sentencing proceedings in cases in which the defendant is convicted on or after the date of enactment of this Act [Apr. 24, 1996]." Siegel, supra at 1258. The alleged crimes occurred between February, 1988 to May, 1990. The Court agreed with the defendant's position that 1996 MVRA "should not be applied in reviewing the validity of the court's restitution order because to do so would violate the Ex Post Facto Clause of the United States Constitution. See U.S. Const. art I, §9, cl. 3."
+
+In resolving the issue in favor of the defendant, the Court first considered whether a restitution order is a punishment. Id, at 1259. In determining that restitution was a punishment, the Court noted that §3663A(a)(1) of Title 18 expressly describes restitution as a "penalty." In addition, the Court also noted that "[a]lthough not in the context of an ex post facto determination, ... restitution is a 'criminal penalty meant to have strong deterrent and rehabilitative effect.' United States v. Twittv 107 F.3d 1482, 1493 n. 12 (11th Cir.1997)." Second, the Court considered "whether the imposition of restitution
+
+under the MVRA is an increased penalty as prohibited by the Ex Post Facto Clause." Id, at 1259. In determining that the application of the 1996 MVRA would indeed run afoul of the Constitution's Ex Post Facto Clause, the Court agreed with the majority of the Circuits that restitution under the 1996 MVRA was an increased penalty.3 "The effect of the MVRA can be detrimental to a defendant. Previously, after considering the defendant's financial condition, the court had the discretion to order restitution in an amount less than the loss sustained by the victim. Under the MVRA, however, the court must order restitution to each victim in the full amount." Id, at 1260. See also U.S. v. MEI 162 F.2d 87 (3rd Circuit 1998).
+
+Based on these principles barring retroactive application, Defendant is entitled to a determination that the statute in effect at the time of the alleged criminal conduct applies and, thus, Count III is subject to dismissal. The statute now criminalizes conduct not previously so criminalized.
+
+As further explained by the Landgraf court, supra at 280, and at 1505,4
+
+When a case implicates a federal statute enacted after the events in suit, the court's first task is to determine whether Congress has expressly prescribed the statute's proper reach. If Congress has done so, of course, there is no need to resort to judicial default rules. When, however, the statute contains no such express command, the court must determine whether the new statute would have retroactive effect, i.e., whether it would impair rights a party possessed when he acted, increase a party's liability for past conduct, or impose new duties with respect to transactions already completed. If the statute would operate
+
+<sup>3</sup> The Eleventh Circuit, in holding that "the MVRA cannot be applied to a person whose criminal conduct occurred prior to April 24, 1996," was "persuaded by the majority of districts on this issue." "Restitution is a criminal penalty carrying with it characteristics of criminal punishment." Siegel, supra at 1260. The Eleventh Circuit is in agreement with the Second, Third, Eighth, Ninth, and D.C. Circuits. See U.S. v. Futrell, 209 F.3d 1286, 1289-90 (11th Cir. 2000).
+
+<sup>4</sup> In Landgraf the United States Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the Court of Appeals and refused to apply new provisions of the Civil Rights Act of 1991 to conduct occurring before the effective date of the Act. The Court determined that statutory text in question, §102, was subject to the presumption against statutory retroactivity.
+
+retroactively, our traditional presumption teaches that it does not govern absent clear congressional intent favoring such a result.
+
+Even though C.L. has invoked the provisions of the criminal NPA between EPSTEIN and USAO (see paragraphs 27 and 28 of Complaint), it does not mean that Plaintiff can avoid application of the well established constitutional protections discussed herein (as well as other constitutional protections and principles, including but not limited to the rule of lenity and due process) and which EPSTEIN is entitled to assert so long as the assertions do not conflict with his obligations to neither contest jurisdiction nor liability as set forth in paragraph 8 of the NPA.
+
+Thus, Count III should be dismissed to the extent it relies on conduct that occurred prior to July 27, 2006, and relies on a criminal predicate act that did not come into existence until July 27, 2006, in violation of the constitutional prohibitions of retroactivity.
+
+# Conclusion
+
+Pursuant to the above, Count III is required to be dismissed. In addition, Plaintiff should be required to more definitely state the specific dates of the alleged conduct by EPSTEIN specifically involving her, and her date of birth. Any conduct occurring after her 18th birthday should be stricken, and ¶18 - 15 of the Complaint should also be stricken and be replead to the extent that allegations specifically involve C.L.
+
+WHEREFORE, Defendant requests that this Court dismiss Count III against him, and further grant his Motion for More Definite Statement and to Strike.
+
+> /s/ Robert D. Critton. Jr. Robert D. Critton, Jr., Esq. Attorney for Defendant
+
+**Certificate of Service**
+
+I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record identified on the following Service List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on this 9/10 day of May, 2010.
+
+**Spencer T. Kuvin, Esq.** (Fla. Bar No. 089737)
+
+[skuvin@leopoldkuvin.com](mailto:skuvin@leopoldkuvin.com)
+
+**Gregory S. Weiss, Esq.** (Fla. Bar No. 163430)
+
+[gweiss@leopoldkuvin.com](mailto:gweiss@leopoldkuvin.com)
+
+Leopold-Kuvin, P.A.
+
+2925 PGA Blvd., Suite 200
+
+Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410
+
+Phone: (561) 515-1400
+
+Fax: (561) 515-1401
+
+*Counsel for Plaintiff*
+
+**Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq.**
+
+Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
+
+250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400
+
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012
+
+561-659-8300
+
+Fax: 561-835-8691
+
+[jagesq@bellsouth.net](mailto:jagesq@bellsouth.net)
+
+*Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein*
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+By: /s/ Robert D. Critton, Jr.
+
+ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ.
+
+Florida Bar No. 224162
+
+[rcrit@bclclaw.com](mailto:rcrit@bclclaw.com)
+
+MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ.
+
+Florida Bar #617296
+
+[mpike@bclclaw.com](mailto:mpike@bclclaw.com)
+
+BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER &  
+COLEMAN
+
+303 Banyan Blvd., Suite 400
+
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+
+561/842-2820 Phone
+
+561/515-3148 Fax
+
+*(Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein)*
+
+18 USCA 42255 (1999-July 26, 2006):
+
+# PART I--CRIMES
+
+# CHAPTER 110--SEXUAL EXPLOITATION AND OTHER ABUSE OF CHILDREN
+
+§ 2255. Civil remedy for personal injuries
+
+(a) Any minor who is a victim of a violation of section 2241(c), 2242, 2243, 2251, 2251A, 2252 2252A, 2260, 2421, 2422, or 2423 of this title and who suffers personal injury as a result of such violation may sue in any appropriate United States District Court and shall recover the actual damages such minor sustains and the cost of the suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee. Any minor as described in the preceding sentence shall be deemed to have sustained damages of no less than \$50,000 in value.
+
+(b) Any action commenced under this section shall be barred unless the complaint is filed within six years after the right of action first accrues or in the case of a person under a legal disability, not later than three years after the disability.
+
+# CREDIT(S)
+
+(Added Pub.L. 99-500, Title I, § 101(b) [Title VII, § 703(a)], Oct. 18, 1986, 100 Stat. 1783-75, and amended Pub.L. 99-591, Title I, § 101(b) [Title VII, § 703(a)], Oct. 30, 1986, 100 Stat. 3341-75; Pub.L. 105-314, Title VI. § 605, Oct. 30, 1998, 112 Stat. 2984.)
+
+18 U.S.C. 42255, as amended 2006, Effective July 27, 2006:
+
+# PART I--CRIMES
+
+# CHAPTER 110--SEXUAL EXPLOITATION AND OTHER ABUSE OF CHILDREN
+
+§ 2255. Civil remedy for personal injuries
+
+(a) In general.--Any person who, while a minor, was a victim of a violation of section 2241(c), 2242, 2243, 2251, 2251A, 2252, 2252A, 2260, 2421, 2422, or 2423 of this title and who suffers personal injury as a result of such violation, regardless of whether the injury occurred while such person was a minor, may sue in any appropriate United States District Court and shall recover the actual damages such person sustains and the cost of the suit, including a reasonable attorney's fee. Any person as described in the preceding sentence shall be deemed to have sustained damages of no less than \$150,000 in value.
+
+(b) Statute of limitations.--Any action commenced under this section shall be barred unless the complaint is filed within six years after the right of action first accrues or in the case of a person under a legal disability, not later than three years after the disability.
+
+## CREDIT(S)
+
+(Added Pub.L. 99-500, Title I, & 101(6) [Title VII, § 703(a)], Oct. 18, 1986, 100 Stat. 1783-75, and amended Pub.L. 99-591, Title I, § 101(1)) [Title VII, § 703(a)], Oct. 30, 1986, 100 Stat. 3341-75; Pub.L. 105-314, Title VI, & 605, Oct. 30, 1998, 112 Stat. 2984; Pub.L. 109-248, Title VII, § 707(b), (c), July 27, 2006, 120 Stat. 650.)
+
+# <sup>2</sup>Part I. Crimes
+
+# Chapter 110. Sexual Exploitation and Other Abuse of Children
+
+## § 2252A. Certain activities relating to material constituting or containing child pornography
+
+(a) Any person who—
+
+(1) knowingly mails, or transports or ships in interstate or foreign commerce by any means, including by computer, any child pornography;
+
+(2) knowingly receives or distributes—
+
+(A) any child pornography that has been mailed, or shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce by any means, including by computer; or
+
+(B) any material that contains child pornography that has been mailed, or shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce by any means, including by computer;
+
+(3) knowingly—
+
+(A) reproduces any child pornography for distribution through the mails, or in interstate or foreign commerce by any means, including by computer; or
+
+(B) advertises, promotes, presents, distributes, or solicits through the mails, or in interstate or foreign commerce by any means, including by computer, any material or purported material in a manner that reflects the belief, or that is intended to cause another to believe, that the material or purported material is, or contains—
+
+(i) an obscene visual depiction of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; or
+
+(ii) a visual depiction of an actual minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct;
+
+(4) either—
+
+(A) in the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, or on any land or building owned by, leased to, or otherwise used by or under the control of the United States Government, or in the Indian country (as defined in section 1151), knowingly sells or possesses with the intent to sell any child pornography; or
+
+(B) knowingly sells or possesses with the intent to sell any child pornography that has been mailed, or shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce by any means, including by computer, or that was produced using materials that have been mailed, or shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce by any means, including by computer;
+
+(5) either—
+
+(A) in the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, or on any land or building owned by, leased to, or otherwise used by or under the control of the United States Government, or in the Indian country (as defined in section 1151), knowingly possesses any book, magazine, periodical, film, videotape, computer disk, or any other material that contains an image of child pornography; or
+
+(B) knowingly possesses any book, magazine, periodical, film, videotape, computer disk, or any other material that contains an image of child pornography that has been mailed, or shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce by any means, including by computer, or that was produced using materials that have been mailed, or shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce by any means, including by computer; or
+
+(6) knowingly distributes, offers, sends, or provides to a minor any visual depiction, including any photograph, film, video, picture, or computer generated image or picture, whether made or produced by electronic, mechanical, or other means, where such visual depiction is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct—
+
+(A) that has been mailed, shipped, or transported in interstate or foreign commerce by any means, including by computer;
+
+(B) that was produced using materials that have been mailed, shipped, or transported in interstate or foreign commerce by any means, including by computer; or
+
+(C) which distribution, offer, sending, or provision is accomplished using the mails or by transmitting or causing to be transmitted any wire communication in interstate or foreign commerce, including by computer,
+
+for purposes of inducing or persuading a minor to participate in any activity that is illegal. [FN 1]
+
+shall be punished as provided in subsection (b).
+
+(b)(1) Whoever violates, or attempts or conspires to violate, paragraph (1), (2), (3), (4), or (6) of subsection (a) shall be fined under this title and imprisoned not less than 5 years and not more than 20 years, but, if such person has a prior conviction under this chapter, chapter 71, chapter 109A, chapter 117, or under section 920 of title 10 (article 120 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), or under the laws of any State relating to aggravated sexual abuse, sexual abuse, or abusive sexual conduct involving a minor or or the production, possession, receipt, mailing, sale, distribution, shipment, or transportation of child pornography, such person shall be fined under this title and imprisoned for not less than 15 years nor more than 40 years.
+
+(2) Whoever violates, or attempts or conspires to violate, subsection (a)(5) shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both, but, if such person has a prior conviction under this chapter, chapter 71, chapter 109A, or chapter 117, or under section 920 of title 10 (article 120 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), or under the laws of any State relating to aggravated sexual abuse, sexual abuse, or abusive sexual conduct involving a minor or or the production, possession, receipt, mailing, sale, distribution, shipment, or transportation of child pornography, such person shall be fined under this title and imprisoned for not less than 10 years nor more than 20 years.
+
+(c) It shall be an affirmative defense to a charge of violating paragraph (1), (2), (3)(A), (4), or (5) of subsection (a) that—
+
+(1)(A) the alleged child pornography was produced using an actual person or persons engaging in sexually explicit conduct; and
+
+(B) each such person was an adult at the time the material was produced; or
+
+(2) the alleged child pornography was not produced using any actual minor or minors.
+
+No affirmative defense under subsection (c)(2) shall be available in any prosecution that involves child pornography as described in section 2256(8)(C). A defendant may not assert an affirmative defense to a charge of violating paragraph (1), (2), (3)(A), (4), or (5) of subsection (a) unless, within the time provided for filing pretrial motions or at such time prior to trial as the judge may direct, but in no event later than 10 days before the commencement of the trial, the defendant provides the court and the United States with notice of the intent to assert such defense and the substance of any expert or other specialized testimony or evidence upon which the defendant intends to rely. If the defendant fails to comply with this subsection, the court shall, absent a finding of extraordinary circumstances that prevented timely compliance, prohibit the defendant from asserting such defense to a charge of violating paragraph (1), (2), (3)(A), (4), or (5) of subsection (a) or presenting any evidence for which the defendant has failed to provide proper and timely notice.
+
+(d) Affirmative defense.—It shall be an affirmative defense to a charge of violating subsection (a)(5) that the defendant—
+
+(1) possessed less than three images of child pornography; and
+
+(2) promptly and in good faith, and without retaining or allowing any person, other than a law enforcement agency, to access any image or copy thereof—
+
+(A) took reasonable steps to destroy each such image; or
+
+(B) reported the matter to a law enforcement agency and afforded that agency access to each such image.
+
+(e) Admissibility of evidence.—On motion of the government, in any prosecution under this chapter or section 1466A, except for good cause shown, the name, address, social security number, or other nonphysical identifying information, other than the age or approximate age, of any minor who is depicted in any child pornography shall not be admissible and may be redacted from any otherwise admissible evidence, and the jury shall be instructed, upon request of the United States, that it can draw no inference from the absence of such evidence in deciding whether the child pornography depicts an actual minor.
+
+(1) Civil remedies.—
+
+(I) In general.—Any person aggrieved by reason of the conduct prohibited under subsection (a) or (b) or section 1466A may commence a civil action for the relief set forth in paragraph (2).
+
+(2) Relief.—In any action commenced in accordance with paragraph (1), the court may award appropriate relief, including—
+
+(A) temporary, preliminary, or permanent injunctive relief;
+
+(B) compensatory and punitive damages; and
+
+(C) the costs of the civil action and reasonable fees for attorneys and expert witnesses.
+
+As amended eff. July 27, 2006 — Adding Subsection (g).
+
+## § 2252A. Certain activities relating to material constituting or containing child pornography
+
+(a) Any person who—
+
+(1) knowingly mails, or transports or ships in interstate or foreign commerce by any means, including by computer, any child pornography;
+
+(2) knowingly receives or distributes—
+
+(A) any child pornography that has been mailed, or shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce by any means, including by computer; or
+
+(B) any material that contains child pornography that has been mailed, or shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce by any means, including by computer;
+
+(3) knowingly—
+
+(A) reproduces any child pornography for distribution through the mails, or in interstate or foreign commerce by any means, including by computer; or
+
+(B) advertises, promotes, presents, distributes, or solicits through the mails, or in interstate or foreign commerce by any means, including by computer, any material or purported material in a manner that reflects the belief, or that is intended to cause another to believe, that the material or purported material is, or contains—
+
+(i) an obscene visual depiction of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; or
+
+---
+
+(ii) a visual depiction of an actual minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct;
+
+(4) either—
+
+(A) in the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, or on any land or building owned by, leased to, or otherwise used by or under the control of the United States Government, or in the Indian country (as defined in section 1151), knowingly sells or possesses with the intent to sell any child pornography; or
+
+(B) knowingly sells or possesses with the intent to sell any child pornography that has been mailed, or shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce by any means, including by computer, or that was produced using materials that have been mailed, or shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce by any means, including by computer;
+
+(5) either—
+
+(A) in the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, or on any land or building owned by, leased to, or otherwise used by or under the control of the United States Government, or in the Indian country (as defined in section 1151), knowingly possesses any book, magazine, periodical, film, videotape, computer disk, or any other material that contains an image of child pornography; or
+
+(B) knowingly possesses any book, magazine, periodical, film, videotape, computer disk, or any other material that contains an image of child pornography that has been mailed, or shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce by any means, including by computer, or that was produced using materials that have been mailed, or shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce by any means, including by computer; or
+
+(6) knowingly distributes, offers, sends, or provides to a minor any visual depiction, including any photograph, film, video, picture, or computer generated image or picture, whether made or produced by electronic, mechanical, or other means, where such visual depiction is, or appears to be, of a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct—
+
+(A) that has been mailed, shipped, or transported in interstate or foreign commerce by any means, including by computer;
+
+(B) that was produced using materials that have been mailed, shipped, or transported in interstate or foreign commerce by any means, including by computer; or
+
+(C) which distribution, offer, sending, or provision is accomplished using the mails or by transmitting or causing to be transmitted any wire communication in interstate or foreign commerce, including by computer,
+
+for purposes of inducing or persuading a minor to participate in any activity that is illegal.  
+[FN1]
+
+shall be punished as provided in subsection (b).
+
+(b)(1) Whoever violates, or attempts or conspires to violate, paragraph (1), (2), (3), (4), or (6) of subsection (a) shall be fined under this title and imprisoned not less than 5 years and not more than 20 years, but, if such person has a prior conviction under this chapter, section 1591, chapter 71, chapter 109A, chapter 117, or under section 920 of title 10 (article 120 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), or under the laws of any State relating to aggravated sexual abuse, sexual abuse, or abusive sexual conduct involving a
+
+---
+
+minor or [REDACTED], or the production, possession, receipt, mailing, sale, distribution, shipment, or transportation of child pornography, or sex trafficking of children, such person shall be fined under this title and imprisoned for not less than 15 years nor more than 40 years.
+
+(2) Whoever violates, or attempts or conspires to violate, subsection (a)(5) shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both, but, if such person has a prior conviction under this chapter, chapter 71, chapter 109A, or chapter 117, or under section 920 of title 10 (article 120 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), or under the laws of any State relating to aggravated sexual abuse, sexual abuse, or abusive sexual conduct involving a minor or [REDACTED], or the production, possession, receipt, mailing, sale, distribution, shipment, or transportation of child pornography, such person shall be fined under this title and imprisoned for not less than 10 years nor more than 20 years.
+
+(c) It shall be an affirmative defense to a charge of violating paragraph (1), (2), (3)(A), (4), or (5) of subsection (a) that—
+
+(1)(A) the alleged child pornography was produced using an actual person or persons engaging in sexually explicit conduct; and
+
+(B) each such person was an adult at the time the material was produced; or
+
+(2) the alleged child pornography was not produced using any actual minor or minors.
+
+No affirmative defense under subsection (c)(2) shall be available in any prosecution that involves child pornography as described in section 2256(8)(C). A defendant may not assert an affirmative defense to a charge of violating paragraph (1), (2), (3)(A), (4), or (5) of subsection (a) unless, within the time provided for filing pretrial motions or at such time prior to trial as the judge may direct, but in no event later than 10 days before the commencement of the trial, the defendant provides the court and the United States with notice of the intent to assert such defense and the substance of any expert or other specialized testimony or evidence upon which the defendant intends to rely. If the defendant fails to comply with this subsection, the court shall, absent a finding of extraordinary circumstances that prevented timely compliance, prohibit the defendant from asserting such defense to a charge of violating paragraph (1), (2), (3)(A), (4), or (5) of subsection (a) or presenting any evidence for which the defendant has failed to provide proper and timely notice.
+
+(d) **Affirmative defense.**—It shall be an affirmative defense to a charge of violating subsection (a)(5) that the defendant—
+
+(1) possessed less than three images of child pornography; and
+
+(2) promptly and in good faith, and without retaining or allowing any person, other than a law enforcement agency, to access any image or copy thereof—
+
+(A) took reasonable steps to destroy each such image; or
+
+(B) reported the matter to a law enforcement agency and afforded that agency access to each such image.
+
+(e) Admissibility of evidence.—On motion of the government, in any prosecution under this chapter or section 1466A, except for good cause shown, the name, address, social security number, or other nonphysical identifying information, other than the age or approximate age, of any minor who is depicted in any child pornography shall not be admissible and may be redacted from any otherwise admissible evidence, and the jury shall be instructed, upon request of the United States, that it can draw no inference from the absence of such evidence in deciding whether the child pornography depicts an actual minor.
+
+(1) Civil remedies.—
+
+(1) In general.—Any person aggrieved by reason of the conduct prohibited under subsection (a) or (b) or section 1466A may commence a civil action for the relief set forth in paragraph (2).
+
+(2) Relief.—In any action commenced in accordance with paragraph (1), the court may award appropriate relief, including—
+
+(A) temporary, preliminary, or permanent injunctive relief;
+
+(B) compensatory and punitive damages; and
+
+(C) the costs of the civil action and reasonable fees for attorneys and expert witnesses.
+
+(g) Child exploitation enterprises.—
+
+(1) Whoever engages in a child exploitation enterprise shall be fined under this title and imprisoned for any term of years not less than 20 or for life.
+
+(2) A person engages in a child exploitation enterprise for the purposes of this section if the person violates section 1591, section 1201 if the victim is a minor, or chapter 109A (involving a minor victim), 110 (except for sections 2257 and 2257A), or 117 (involving a minor victim), as a part of a series of felony violations constituting three or more separate incidents and involving more than one victim, and commits those offenses in concert with three or more other persons.
+
+(Emphasis added to show new subsection (g)).

marker2/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732341/EFTA02732341.metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,1184 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732341.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 22,
+  "chars": 49192,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 14.68,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            200.73600000000002,
+            72.9
+          ],
+          [
+            412.886474609375,
+            72.9
+          ],
+          [
+            412.886474609375,
+            101.9830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            200.73600000000002,
+            101.9830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR MORE DEFINITE \nSTATEMENT & TO STRIKE, & TO DISMISS DIRECTED TO COUNT \nIII OF PLAINTIFF C.L.'S COMPLAINT ID.E. 1, dated 3/31/2010j",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            114.44400000000002,
+            238.95
+          ],
+          [
+            500.6459045410156,
+            238.95
+          ],
+          [
+            500.6459045410156,
+            282.363037109375
+          ],
+          [
+            114.44400000000002,
+            282.363037109375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Supporting Memorandum of Law",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            217.26,
+            157.95
+          ],
+          [
+            398.0406188964844,
+            157.95
+          ],
+          [
+            398.0406188964844,
+            173.2330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            217.26,
+            173.2330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Motion For More Definite Statement and To Strike, Rule 12(e) and (0, F.R.C.P.",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            99.756,
+            180.3309326171875
+          ],
+          [
+            516.3394775390625,
+            180.3309326171875
+          ],
+          [
+            516.3394775390625,
+            202.0482177734375
+          ],
+          [
+            99.756,
+            202.0482177734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Motion to Dismiss Count III",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            233.784,
+            462.51
+          ],
+          [
+            384.2554626464844,
+            462.51
+          ],
+          [
+            384.2554626464844,
+            477.363037109375
+          ],
+          [
+            233.784,
+            477.363037109375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Conclusion",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 12,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            277.848,
+            421.20000000000005
+          ],
+          [
+            341.1119689941406,
+            421.20000000000005
+          ],
+          [
+            341.1119689941406,
+            437.60302734375
+          ],
+          [
+            277.848,
+            437.60302734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Certificate of Service",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 13,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            248.47200000000004,
+            77.76
+          ],
+          [
+            361.08,
+            77.76
+          ],
+          [
+            361.08,
+            90.72
+          ],
+          [
+            248.47200000000004,
+            90.72
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "PART I--CRIMES",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 14,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            116.892,
+            105.30000000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            213.8623504638672,
+            105.30000000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            213.8623504638672,
+            120.7330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            116.892,
+            120.7330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CHAPTER 110--SEXUAL EXPLOITATION AND OTHER ABUSE OF \nCHILDREN",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 14,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            116.892,
+            118.25999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            527.439208984375,
+            118.25999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            527.439208984375,
+            148.10302734375
+          ],
+          [
+            116.892,
+            148.10302734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CREDIT(S)",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 14,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            124.23600000000002,
+            366.93
+          ],
+          [
+            188.50950622558594,
+            366.93
+          ],
+          [
+            188.50950622558594,
+            383.2330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            124.23600000000002,
+            383.2330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "PART I--CRIMES",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 14,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            124.23600000000002,
+            478.71
+          ],
+          [
+            221.38804626464844,
+            478.71
+          ],
+          [
+            221.38804626464844,
+            494.2330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            124.23600000000002,
+            494.2330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CHAPTER 110--SEXUAL EXPLOITATION AND OTHER ABUSE OF \nCHILDREN",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 14,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            88.12799999999999,
+            491.66999999999996
+          ],
+          [
+            527.3838500976562,
+            491.66999999999996
+          ],
+          [
+            527.3838500976562,
+            528.7330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            88.12799999999999,
+            528.7330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CREDIT(S)",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 15,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            115.66799999999999,
+            167.67000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            181.00949096679688,
+            167.67000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            181.00949096679688,
+            182.2330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            115.66799999999999,
+            182.2330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "2Part I. Crimes",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 15,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            86.904,
+            261.63
+          ],
+          [
+            174.83958435058594,
+            261.63
+          ],
+          [
+            174.83958435058594,
+            278.9830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            86.904,
+            278.9830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Chapter 110. Sexual Exploitation and Other Abuse of Children",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 15,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            86.904,
+            277.02
+          ],
+          [
+            417.7898254394531,
+            277.02
+          ],
+          [
+            417.7898254394531,
+            292.863037109375
+          ],
+          [
+            86.904,
+            292.863037109375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "\u00a7 2252A. Certain activities relating to material constituting or containing \nchild pornography",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 15,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            109.548,
+            305.37
+          ],
+          [
+            506.9087829589844,
+            305.37
+          ],
+          [
+            506.9087829589844,
+            334.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            109.548,
+            334.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "\u00a7 2252A. Certain activities relating to material constituting or containing child \npornography",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 18,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            87.51599999999999,
+            439.83000000000004
+          ],
+          [
+            495.2669982910156,
+            439.83000000000004
+          ],
+          [
+            495.2669982910156,
+            468.7330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            87.51599999999999,
+            468.7330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            57
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            61
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            29
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            63
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            83
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            36
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            66
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            31
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            75
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            34
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 9,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            79
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            30
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 10,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            57
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 11,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            84
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            34
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 12,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            55
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 13,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            66
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 14,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            89
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            39
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 15,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            92
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            43
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            14
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 16,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            89
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            45
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            11
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 17,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            86
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            43
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 18,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            81
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            41
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            17
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 19,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            30
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 20,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            24
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 21,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            59
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            30
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            11
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02732341"
+  }
+}

marker2/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732363/EFTA02732363.md

@@ -0,0 +1,101 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO 10-80447 —CV-MARRA/.
+
+C. L.,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENTION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT AND TO STRIKE AND TO DISMISS DIRECTED TO COUNT III OF PLAINTIFF C.L'S COMPLAINT DATED 3/31/10
+
+Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. and S.O. Fla.L.R.7.1, Plaintiff, C.L., hereby files this Unopposed Motion For Extension Of Time To Respond To Defendants' Motion for More Definite Statement and to Strike and to Dismiss Count HI of Complaint. Plaintiffs have good cause for this extension given that lead counsel for Plaintiff begins trial on Tuesday, May 11, 2010 in Palm Beach Civil Circuit Court before the Honorable Edward A. Garrison, Circuit Case No.: 50 2009 CA 028195 XXXX MB AI. Defendants have agreed to give Plaintiffs a ten (10) day extension of time to respond so that Plaintiffs must file a response to Defendants' Motion May 28, 2010.
+
+## RELIEF REQUESTED
+
+The undersigned respectfully requests that the Court grant Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion For Extension Of Time To Respond To Defendants' Motion for More Definite Statement, Motion to Strike and to Dismiss Count III Of Complaint. Plaintiff has attached a proposed order.
+
+**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE**
+
+I hereby certify that on May 11, 2010 I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record or pro se parties identified on the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those counsel or parties who are not authorized to receive electronically.
+
+Robert D. Critton, Jr., Esq.
+
+[rcrit@bclclaw.com](mailto:rcrit@bclclaw.com)
+
+Michael J. Pike, Esq.
+
+[mpike@bclclaw.com](mailto:mpike@bclclaw.com)
+
+Burman Critton Luttier & Coleman
+
+303 Banyon Boulevard
+
+Suite 400
+
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+
+561-842-2820
+
+Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq.
+
+[jagesq@bellsouth.net](mailto:jagesq@bellsouth.net)
+
+Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
+
+250 Australian Ave South, Ste 1400
+
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+
+561-659-8300
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+By: s/SPENCER T. KUVIN, ESQ.
+
+(Florida Bar No.: 089737)
+
+Email: [skuvin@leopoldkuvin.com](mailto:skuvin@leopoldkuvin.com)
+
+Leopold-Kuvin, P.A.
+
+2925 PGA Boulevard, Suite 200
+
+Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410
+
+Telephone: (561) 515-1400
+
+Facsimile: (561) 515-1401
+
+Attorneys for Plaintiff
+
+# UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO: 10-80447 —CV-MARRA...
+
+C. L.,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+# JPROPOSED1 ORDER ON MOTION FOR EXTENSTION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT AND TO STRIKE AND TO DISMISS DIRECTED TO COUNT III OF PLAINTIFF C.L'S COMPLAINT DATED 3/31/10
+
+Upon PLAINTIFF'S unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond pursuant to Local Rule 7.1 of the United States District Court of Southern District of Florida, it is hereby:
+
+ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff has until and including May 28, 2010, to respond to Defendant's Motion for More Definite Statement & to Strike & to Dismiss Directed to County III of Plaintiff C.L.'s Complaint dated March 31, 2010.
+
+DONE AND ORDERED in at Miami, Florida this day of May, 2010.
+
+The Honorable Kenneth A. Marra Federal Court Judge
+
+Copies furnished to:
+
+Spencer T. Kuvin, Esq., Leopold-Kuvin, PA, 2925 PGA Blvd, Suite 200, Palm Beach Gardens, FL Robert D. Critton, Esq., Jr., Burman Critton, 303 Banyon Blvd, Suite 400, West Palm Beach, FL Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq., Atterbury Goldberger, 250 Austndian Ave S., Ste 1400, WPB, FL

marker2/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732363/EFTA02732363.metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,269 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732363.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 3,
+  "chars": 3812,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 6.93,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nFOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA \nCASE NO 10-80447 \u2014CV-MARRA/.",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            190.94400000000002,
+            72.9
+          ],
+          [
+            444.5710144042969,
+            72.9
+          ],
+          [
+            444.5710144042969,
+            114.7330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            190.94400000000002,
+            114.7330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENTION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO \nDEFENDANT'S EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT AND TO \nSTRIKE AND TO DISMISS DIRECTED TO COUNT III OF PLAINTIFF \nC.L'S COMPLAINT DATED 3/31/10",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            74.05199999999999,
+            319.7988586425781
+          ],
+          [
+            543.2289428710938,
+            319.7988586425781
+          ],
+          [
+            543.2289428710938,
+            375.80352783203125
+          ],
+          [
+            74.05199999999999,
+            375.80352783203125
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "RELIEF REQUESTED",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            266.832,
+            609.9300000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            386.2843322753906,
+            609.9300000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            386.2843322753906,
+            623.9830169677734
+          ],
+          [
+            266.832,
+            623.9830169677734
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            224.60399999999998,
+            72.9
+          ],
+          [
+            388.62,
+            72.9
+          ],
+          [
+            388.62,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            224.60399999999998,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA \nCASE NO: 10-80447 \u2014CV-MARRA...",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            192.78000000000003,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            445.0431213378906,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            445.0431213378906,
+            114.49249267578125
+          ],
+          [
+            192.78000000000003,
+            114.49249267578125
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "JPROPOSED1 ORDER ON MOTION FOR EXTENSTION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO \nDEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT AND TO \nSTRIKE AND TO DISMISS DIRECTED TO COUNT III OF PLAINTIFF C.L'S \nCOMPLAINT DATED 3/31/10",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            75.888,
+            290.78999999999996
+          ],
+          [
+            543.9100952148438,
+            290.78999999999996
+          ],
+          [
+            543.9100952148438,
+            348.11248779296875
+          ],
+          [
+            75.888,
+            348.11248779296875
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            52
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            54
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            11
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02732363"
+  }
+}

marker2/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732366/EFTA02732366.md

@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO: 10-80447 —CV-MARRA/a
+
+C. L.
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT EI'STEIN'S MOTION FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT & TO STRIKE, & TO DISMISS DIRECTED TO COUNT III OF PLAINTIFF C.L.'S COMPLAINT
+
+Plaintiff, C. L., by and through her undersigned counsel, files this Response to Defendant Epstein's Motion For More Definite Statement & To Strike, & To Dismiss Directed To Count III Of Plaintiff C.L.'S Complaint. ("Motion"). First, Defendant argues that Count III of Plaintiff's Complaint should be dismissed because the predicate act relied upori, 18 U.S.C. § 2252 A(g), did not come into effect until July 27, 2006, well after Defendant's offensive conduct occurred. Defendant then seeks a more definite statement, i.e., for Plaintiff to allege her date of birth in order to establish when she reached 18, the age of majority under state and federal law. Finally, Defendant seeks to strike paragraphs 8 through 15 of Plaintiff's Complaint as immaterial and impertinent.
+
+Defendant's motion should be denied for the reasons set forth below:
+
+# I. Count III Should Not Be Dismissed, As Retroactive Application Of 6 2252 A(G)(I) And (2) Does Not Violate Constitutional Ex Post Facto Prohibitions
+
+In moving to dismiss, Defendant focused on the issue of whether Plaintiff may bring the claim set forth in Count III of her Complaint in which she alleged that the Defendant knowingly engaged in a child exploitation enterprise, as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 2252 A(g)(2), in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252 A(g)(l). Section 2252 A is one of the specified predicate acts under 18 U.S.C. § 2255, although subsection (g) of that statute was not enacted until 2006, after Defendant's offending conduct occurred. Defendant's argument is premised on the fact that Defendant molested the then minor Plaintiff before subsection (g) of that statute was enacted. Defendant's argument must fail. The Ex Post Facto clause does not apply because the remedy afforded under Section 2255 and Section 2252 A is a non-punitive civil remedy.
+
+The matter of whether these and other such amendments may be applied retroactively is extremely relevant to Plaintiff's claims and the remedies sought throughout her Complaint. Plaintiff and Defendant fundamentally disagree as to the retroactive nature of 18 U.S.C. § 2255A as well as the interpretation of whichever version of §2255 the Court adopts. The Court's decisions as to retroactive application of § 2255 ultimately will critically affect the results of claims brought by each and every one of Defendant's many victims who are currently seeking redress under §2255. Thus, its significance cannot be overemphasized.
+
+# A. Background Of The 2006 Amendment To The Statute
+
+In July of 2006 substantial changes were made in Section 2255 and to some of its predicate acts as the result of the enactment of the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006 ("AWA"). One such measure in the AWA was the Internet Safety
+
+Act, which was codified in §2252 A(g), and outlawed child exploitation enterprises and set a mandatory minimum prison sentence of 20 years for those who act in concert to commit at least three separate violations of federal child pornography, sex trafficking, or sexual abuse laws against multiple child victims. Another very important change brought about by the AWA was Masha's Law', which addressed child exploitation over the Internet.
+
+Section 2255 has been lauded as an additional remedy against those who sexually exploit or abuse children. Even though the 2006 Amendment provided for more penalties for child abusers, the pervasive tenor of the legislation was curative and remedial in nature. Throughout the Congressional Record of the enactment of the AWA2, the act is praised for its extraordinarily remedial quality. For instance, Senator Bill Nelson and others spoke of it as a bill to safeguard children and allow law enforcement to help prevent other families from suffering tragedies similar to those the Walsh's, Lunsford's. Ryce's and Masha had to endure. See Id at S8021. Additionally, President Bush hailed it as giving law enforcement the tools needed to go after criminals who exploit children.;
+
+<sup>&#</sup>x27; On July 27, 2006, twenty-five years after the tragic abduction of Adam Walsh, Congress enacted "Masha's Law" as a part of the AWA. Masha's Law, amended § 2255(a) to increase the statutory minimum damages to \$150,000 and to expand the scope of potential Plaintiffs from "any minor" to "any person, who while a minor" was a victim of a specified statute, i.e., one of the predicate acts listed in 2255, including the one most relevant here, 2252 A. Masha's Law was named after a I3-year-old Russian orphan, who was adopted by a Pennsylvania man with a history of child exploitation. He sexually assaulted her and posted nude photographs of the child all over Internet pedophile web sites, which are still being downloaded every day. Senator John Kerry, one of the authors of Masha's Law, in his remarks on the day of the adoption of the AWA, highlighted the remedial nature of the legislation, when he said that it was because of Masha, that Congress was finally closing unacceptable loopholes in our child exploitation laws. The specific intent of those involved in developing this statutory scheme was for girls similarly violated to be able to bring causes of action as adults because of the continuing nature of such violations. Subsection (g) of 2252 A was also enacted on July 27, 2006 as a part of the AWA.
+
+<sup>21152</sup> Cong. Rec. S8012-02 and )15705-01, 2006 WL 2034118 and 2060156, respectively.
+
+<sup>&#</sup>x27;See House Press Release issued on July 27, 2006 at the signing of the AWA..</p><h3>B. Defendant&#x27;s Argument Is Wrong Because It Ignores The Fact That The Ex Post Facto Clause Is Inapplicable To A Non-Punitive Civil Remedy.</h3><p block-type='Text'>Defendant&#x27;s argument is rooted in his idea that the application of 18 U.S.C. § 2252 A(g)(2006)5 to Defendant&#x27;s act would violate the Er Post Facto Clause of the Constitution. The Plaintiff was sexually molested by the Defendant before the 2006 Amendment was enacted. According to Defendant applying subsection (g) &quot;to events occurring before its enactment and would [illegally] increase the penalty or punishment for the alleged crime.&quot; Motion at 9.</p><p block-type='Text'>Defendant&#x27;s argument must fail — the Er Post Facto Clause only applies to punitive remedies. Manocchino v. Kusserow, 961 F.2d 1539, 1541 (11th Cir. 1992) (citing Fleming v. Nestor, 363 U.S. 603, 613(1960)). As the Supreme Court of the State of Florida stated &quot;[a] civil remedy that does not constitute criminal punishment does not violate ex post facto prohibitions.&quot; v. State, 980 So.2d 1035, 1037 (Fla. 2008). &quot;A statute is not punitive, for purposes of determining whether it violates the ex post facto clause, merely because it can be applied in the context of a criminal case.&quot; Id. Plaintiff&#x27;s case against Defendant is civil, not criminal. Defendant&#x27;s argument that applying subsection (g) would illegally increase the punishment for the alleged crime is misplaced. Plaintiff is not and does not have the power to bring a criminal charge against Defendant. In fact, Plaintiff&#x27;s requested remedy under Section 2255 and by extension Section 2252 A(g) is a non-punitive civil remedy.</p><p><sup>29</sup>ustice Stevens notes in Landgraf at 1487 that the presumption against retroactivity finds its expression in the criminal context in the Ex Post Facto Clause. Section 2252 A(g) alone does not provide for punitive damages, although they are provided for elsewhere in the 2006 version of the statute. Landgraf holds that as such it is `clearly subject to the presumption against retroactivity, since the very labels given &quot;punitive&quot;...damages, as well as the rationales supporting them, demonstrate that they share key characteristics of criminal sanctions, and therefore would raise a serious question under the Er Pao Facto Clause if retroactively imposed.&#x27;</p><p block-type='Text'>Defendant&#x27;s argument is premised on the general axiom that retroactivity is not favored in the law. (Motion at 7, citing Bowen v. Georgetown University, 488 U.S.204, 208, 109 S. Ct., 468, 471 (D.C.Co1.1988)). Quoting extensively from Landgraf v. USI Film Products, 511 U.S. 244, 265-66 (1994), Defendant recited all the concerns underlying the historic presumption against retroactive legislation, one of which is the constitutional prohibition of retroactive application of penal legislation.4 Defendant&#x27;s argument is correctly rooted in the premise that the Ex Post Facto Clause applies to punitive remedies. Unfortunately, Defendant next attempted to use criminal cases to improperly over-extend the Ex Post Facto Clause to the non-punitive civil remedy at hand. This improper extension should not stand.</p><p block-type='Text'>First, Defendant&#x27;s argument relied heavily on the cases of U.S. v. Siegel, 153 F. 3d 1256 (11th Cir. 1998) and U.S. v. 162 F. 3d. 87 (3d. Cir. 1998). Both held the Ex Post Facto Clause barred the application of the Mandatory Victim Restitution Act (MVRA) to defendants whose criminal conduct occurred before the effective date of the statute. Defendant&#x27;s argument glossed over the key distinction between these cases and the matter at hand. In Defendant&#x27;s cited cases the disputed remedy was punitive; i.e., it punished criminal activity. In the case at hand the remedy at issue is a non-punitive civil remedy.</p><p block-type='Text'>This deficiency in Defendant&#x27;s argument is highlighted by Court&#x27;s opinion in , which recognized the remedy at issue in that case (i.e., restitution) was a criminal penalty. Restitution is an integral and necessary part of sentencing, supervised</p><p><sup>41</sup>U.S. Const. Art I, § 9, c1.3.</p><p block-type='Text'>release, and probation.6 at 91. In reaching this decision the Court relied upon the legislative history of the MVRA which indicated mandatory restitution should be considered a condition of a defendant&#x27;s supervised release and probation. Thus, the Court concluded that the MVRA&#x27;s legislative history evinced a congressional intent to . . . make mandatory restitution under the MVRA a penalty separate from civil remedies available to victims of crime . . . i.e., to ensure that restitution under the MVRA is a form of criminal penalty rather than civil redress. See at 91. Defendant&#x27;s argument ignores the fact that while criminal restitution may resemble a civil remedy it simply is not a civil remedy. This is in stark contrast to Plaintiff&#x27;s reliance on § 2252A(g) in her civil case which provides a civil remedy imposed under the civil statute 18 U.S.C. § 2255.</p><h1>C. Section 2255&#x27;s Remedy Is A Non-Punitive Civil Remedy</h1><p block-type='Text'>The remedy provided under Section 2255 and by extension Section 2252A(g) is a non-punitive civil remedy.</p><p block-type='Text'>First, in Individual Known to Defendant as 08MIS70 96.ipg v. Falso, 2009 WL 4807537 (N.D. NY. Dec. 9, 2009), the Court analyzed the remedy provided under Section 2255 and held it was clear the remedy was a civil remedy and was not criminally punitive. Id. As the Court stated, &quot;the fact that the payment of damages might have some deterrent effect is insufficient to categorize the statute as criminal. The statute serves civil goals.&quot; Id. 8</p><p>w 18 U. S. C. §§ 3556, 3563 (a)(b)(A), 3563 (b)(2), 3565, 3663A, 3664.</p><p>w Other decisions relating to AWA agree that the legislation is civil and remedial in nature and not violative of rules or statutes prohibiting retroactivity. See State v. Bodyke 2008-Ohio-6387 (Ohio App. 6th Dist. 2008) (&quot;[T]he more burdensome registration requirements and the collection and dissemination of additional information about the offender are part of a remedial, regulatory scheme designed to protect the public rather [than] to punish the offender). Moreover, in State v. Honey 2008-Ohio-4943 (Ohio App. 9th</p><p block-type='Text'>Second, Plaintiff&#x27;s argument Section 2255&#x27;s remedy is a non-punitive civil remedy is supported by the Eleventh Circuit&#x27;s opinion in Manocchino v. Kusserow, 961 F.2d 1542 (11th Cir. 1992). In Manocchino, the Eleventh Circuit analyzed an ex-post facto challenge to a different statute. The Court stated that &quot;since the legislative intent of [that] [statute] [was] to protect the public, the sanction [was] remedial, not punitive.&quot; 961 F.2d at 1542. The Court held the remedy was not punitive despite clear indications the statute also served punitive goal of providing a deterrent against criminal action. Id. As the Manocchino Court stated, the &quot;legislative history, taken as a whole, demonstrate[d] that the primary goal of the legislation [was] to protect&quot; the public. Id.</p><p block-type='Text'>Like the statute analyzed in Manocchino, the legislative history of Section 2255 points to the fact that the remedy provided under Section 2255 and subsequently Section 2252 is not punitive. First, the House report from Section 2255&#x27;s original passage states that &quot;[t]he bill also authorizes the pursuit of a civil remedy for personal injuries resulting from certain sex crimes against children.&quot; H.R. Rep. No. 105-557, at 11 (1998), reprinted in 1998 U.S.C.C.A.N. 678, 679. Second, the &quot;Background and Need for the Legislation&quot; section demonstrates that the purpose of the legislation, including the remedy, was to protect children. The House reported that &quot;the &#x27;Child Protection and Sexual Predator Punishment Act of 1998,&#x27; [was] a response to requests of ... parents and law enforcement</p><p block-type='Text'>Dist. 2008) the Court explained, &quot;A statute is &#x27;substantive&#x27; if it impairs or takes away vested rights, affects an accrued substantive right, imposes new or additional burdens, duties, obligation, or liabilities as to a past transaction, or creates a new right. Conversely, remedial laws are those affecting only the remedy provided, and include laws that merely substitute a new or more appropriate remedy for the enforcement of an existing right.&quot; Id. at 7. The court explains that &quot;to withstand the Ex Post Facto Clause, a statute must be civil and non-punitive with regard to both the legislature&#x27;s intent in enacting it and its actual effect upon enactment. Id at 6. The court rejects the claim that AWA violates the Constitutional prohibition against ex post facto laws because it is obviously intended to be civil and non-punitive in nature (k0. Because public safety is the driving force behind AWA, the fact that the requirements of the act have a significant impact upon the lives of sex offenders, does not offend Ohio&#x27;s prohibition on retroactive laws. Id at 5. But see, Basel y. McFarland &amp; Sons, Inc., 8I5So. 2d 687,692 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002) (even if legislature expressly provides for it, courts will refuse retroactive application if statute impairs vested rights, creates new obligations or imposes new penalties).</p><p block-type='Text'>to address public safety issues involving the most vulnerable members of our society, our children.&quot; Id. at 12. Accordingly, the legislative history of Section 2255 demonstrates it was intended to protect the public and provide a civil remedy for victims of sexual abuse. Thus, just like the statute in Manocchino, the remedy provided under Section 2255 and by extension Section 2252 while protective is not punitive.</p><h1>D. Conclusion</h1><p block-type='Text'>As a whole, Defendant&#x27;s argument is deficient because it ignores the fact that the Ex Post Facto Clause is only applicable to punitive remedies. Manocchino v. Kusserow, 961 F.2d 1539, 1541 (11th Cir. 1992) (citing Fleming v. Nestor, 363 U.S. 603, 613(1960)). Defendant&#x27;s reliance on Siegel and is misplaced. Those cases dealt with punitive criminal restitution. Section 2255 does not mandate payment of restitution, rather, it provides for a non-punitive civil remedy. 18 U.S.C. § 2255 (2006); Individual Known to Defendant As 08MIST096.JPG and 08mist067.ipa v. Falso, No. 5:08-cd-917, slip op. at 2 (N.D. N.Y. Dec. 9, 2009) (&quot;it is clear that the statutory intent was to provide a civil remedy.&quot;). Just because civil recovery under Section 2255 is predicated on a criminal statute, does not mean that its remedy is punitive. Cf. Patel v. Thompson 319 F.3d 1317, 1319 (11th Cir. 2003). The Defendant&#x27;s over extension should not stand. The Ex Post Facto Clause does not apply to the case at hand.</p><h1>II. Defendant&#x27;s Motion For A More Definite Statement Should Fail Because It Is Inappropriate And Moot.</h1><p block-type='Text'>Plaintiff acknowledges that the date she reached majority has relevance to her § 2255 claims. Accordingly, Plaintiff does not object to providing her birth date to Defendant through appropriate discovery. Plaintiff has alleged that Defendant caused her severe harm while she was a minor by actions constituting the violation of several</p><p block-type='Text'>criminal predicate acts listed in § 2255. Whether or not certain of those specific acts may be found to have been committed after she reached the age of majority will be a factual issue that can be determined through discovery like other factual matters. Under no circumstances can Defendant contend that he did not violate one or more criminal predicate acts harming Plaintiff while she was a minor. Plaintiff has brought her claims anonymously as C.L. specifically to protect her privacy as a child victim. For the same reason she should not be required to publish her birth date in a pleading that is available to the public, as birth dates are but another link in the chain to identification. In any case, since Plaintiff agrees to provide that information privately to the Defendant, his request that it be specifically pled is moot.</p><p block-type='Text'>Plaintiff&#x27;s Complaint without her date of birth satisfies Federal pleading requirements. First, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a)2 only requires, &quot;a short and plain statement of the claim showing the pleader is entitled to relief.&quot; Plaintiff stated she was a minor when Defendant sexually molested her — which is sufficient under FRCP 8(a)(2). Second, Plaintiff&#x27;s Complaint provides ample information to provide the Defendant fair notice as to the nature of her claims. The purpose of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a)2 is to provide the Defendant with fair notice of what claim is being alleged and the grounds upon which it rests. See v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consol., 516 F.3d 955, 974 (11th Cir. 2008). From reading the Complaint the Defendant can certainly decipher that the grounds for Plaintiff&#x27;s claims rest upon Defendant&#x27;s sexual molestation of her when she was a minor. Moreover, the Complaint&#x27;s factual allegations raise a right to relief that is certainly more than speculative — in fact, the Defendant already pled guilty to molesting Plaintiff. See Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twomblv, 550 US</p><p block-type='Text'>544, 555 (2007) (&quot;[f]actual allegations must be enough to raise a right to relief above the speculative level ... on the assumption that all the allegations in the complaint are true (even if doubtful in fact).&quot;). Finally, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(e) requires Plaintiff to provide Defendant a more definite statement only when the Complaint &quot;is so vague and ambiguous that a [Defendant] cannot reasonably prepare a response.&quot; Defendant has enough information to prepare a response to Plaintiff&#x27;s Complaint. To quote Defendant&#x27;s motion, &quot;Defendant&#x27;s attorneys are 100% certain that Plaintiff ... will allege that the conduct took place prior to July 27, 2006.&quot; &quot;...C.L&#x27;s date of birth is April of 1988...and she claimed she was at Defendant&#x27;s home in 2004.&quot; (Motion at 2).</p><p block-type='Text'>Accordingly, Defendant&#x27;s motion for a more definite statement must fail. It is illogical, unnecessary and has no basis in the law. The Plaintiff is not required to give the Defendant more information than is legally necessary just because the Defendant desires that information for an Affirmative Defense.</p><h2>III. Defendant&#x27;s Motion To Strike Paragraphs 8 Through 15 Because They Don&#x27;t Pertain Strictly To The Plaintiff Should Be Denied.</h2><p block-type='Text'>It is no wonder that Defendant would like to eliminate paragraphs 8 through 15 of Plaintiff&#x27;s Complaint; however, his request should be summarily denied. These paragraphs are material and pertinent. They describe the child exploitation enterprise by which Defendant, in concert with at least three assistants, lured countless young women to his lair on exclusive Palm Beach, where he assaulted them and enticed them to perform lewd and lascivious acts for his sexual gratification.</p><p block-type='Text'>Taken paragraph by paragraph, these portions of Plaintiff&#x27;s Complaint allege a systematic pattern of sexual exploitation of vulnerable minor girls by an older man with vast resources and influence. (¶ 10). As part of this plan, Defendant employed agents to</p><p block-type='Text'>call and transport to his residence economically disadvantaged and underage girls, who were unlikely to complain to authorities or would have credibility issues if they did. (1; 11). At least three assistants helped orchestrate Defendant&#x27;s child exploitation enterprise by arranging appointments for massages, escorting the minor victims to the massage room, cajoling them to remove their clothes, delivering cash after each massage and/or procurement and assisting in taking nude photographs of these minor victims. (1 12). The assistants helped secure a secluded place for these activities, making it more difficult for the child victims to flee or for the unlawful exploitation to be detected. (1 13). Assistants would handle introductions and information gathering upon the girls&#x27; arrival before leading them upstairs. (1 14). An assistant or procurer would &quot;lead the way&quot; instructing each new girl as to where and how Defendant liked to be touched during massage. She would then leave the minor girl alone with Defendant, who would expose himself, grope, fondle, digitally penetrate, apply a vibrator or coerce the girl into having intercourse with him or to perform sexual acts with one of his female assistants, all the while masturbating himself. (1 15). Defendant traveled to and from his multiple international residences, using the telephone to contact these minor girls and conspiring with his assistants to facilitate his child exploitation enterprise and avoid police detection. (1 16).</p><p block-type='Text' class='has-continuation'>These were not isolated acts but a systematic, well developed plan. Defendant had a veritable Ponzi scheme by which he secured his young prey, paid them to lure other minor victims and then groomed the faithful among them to become more and more involved with him sexually. In that way, these paragraphs do pertain to C.L. One must understand the system to perceive how Plaintiff was drawn in, groomed, and then abused</p><p block-type='Text'>and molested in a slowly escalating fashion. This was indeed a child exploitation enterprise as described in §2252A.</p><p block-type='Text'>Nonetheless, Defendant only concludes that paragraphs 8 — 15 should be stricken without citing any case and with minimal accompanying argument. Thus, this Court should see Defendant&#x27;s request for what it really is — a smoke screen in an attempt to obscure the terrible facts which surrounded Plaintiff&#x27;s molestation.</p><h4>CONCLUSION</h4><p block-type='Text'>Defendant failed to effectively argue that Count III of Plaintiff&#x27;s claim should be dismissed. Application of Section 2255 and by extension Section 2252 to Defendant&#x27;s acts does not violate the Ex Post Facto Clause. Plaintiff&#x27;s case is civil, not criminal. Those statutes provide for a non-punitive civil remedy, not criminal punishment. Defendant&#x27;s request for a more definite statement must also fail because the Plaintiff sufficiently described her age to state a cause of action. Finally, Defendant failed to provide any legal basis as to why paragraphs 8 - 15 should be stricken from the Complaint. As stated, those paragraphs are pertinent to the story of when Jeffrey Epstein molested the then minor Plaintiff.</p><p block-type='Text'>WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays that the Court deny all parts Defendant&#x27;s Motion.</p><h4>CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE</h4><p block-type='Text'>I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this 26th day of May, 2010, on all counsel identified on the following Service List.</p><p block-type='Text'>Robert D. Critton, Jr., Esq. rcrit@belelaw.com Michael J. Pike, Esq. mnike@belclaw.com BURMAN CRITTON, LU&#x27;ITIER</p><p>&amp; COLEMAN</p><p>303 Banyon Boulevard, Suite 400</p><p>West Palm Beach, FL 33401</p><p>561-842-2820 Phone</p><p>561-515-3148 Fax</p><p>Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein</p><p>Jack A. Goldberger, Esq.</p><p><a href="mailto:jagesq@bellsouth.net">jagesq@bellsouth.net</a></p><p>ATTERBURY GOLDBERGER</p><p>&amp; WEISS, P.A.</p><p>250 Australian Avenue South</p><p>Suite 1400</p><p>West Palm Beach, FL 33401</p><p>561-659-8300 Phone</p><p>561-835-8691 Fax</p><p>Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein</p><p>Respectfully submitted,</p><p><u>By: /s/Spencer T. Kuvin</u></p><p>SPENCER T. KUVIN</p><p>Florida Bar No.: 089737</p><p><a href="mailto:skuvin@leopoldkuvin.com">skuvin@leopoldkuvin.com</a></p><p>Leopold-Kuvin, P.A.</p><p>2925 PGA Boulevard, Suite 200</p><p>Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410</p><p>Telephone: (561) 515-1400</p><p>Facsimile: (561) 515-1401</p><p>Attorneys for Plaintiff</p>
+ </body>
+</html></sup>

marker2/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732366/EFTA02732366.metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,756 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732366.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 13,
+  "chars": 26216,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 6.09,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            211.75199999999995,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            411.2218322753906,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            411.2218322753906,
+            100.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            211.75199999999995,
+            100.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT EI'STEIN'S \nMOTION FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT & TO STRIKE, & TO DISMISS \nDIRECTED TO COUNT III OF PLAINTIFF C.L.'S COMPLAINT",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            91.18799999999999,
+            332.90999999999997
+          ],
+          [
+            528.5728759765625,
+            332.90999999999997
+          ],
+          [
+            528.5728759765625,
+            375.7330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            91.18799999999999,
+            375.7330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "I. Count III Should Not Be Dismissed, As Retroactive Application Of 6 2252 \nA(G)(I) And (2) Does Not Violate Constitutional Ex Post Facto Prohibitions",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            90.576,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            530.6985473632812,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            530.6985473632812,
+            102.05352783203125
+          ],
+          [
+            90.576,
+            102.05352783203125
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "A. Background Of The 2006 Amendment To The Statute",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            127.29599999999999,
+            609.12
+          ],
+          [
+            447.4759826660156,
+            609.12
+          ],
+          [
+            447.4759826660156,
+            625.5535125732422
+          ],
+          [
+            127.29599999999999,
+            625.5535125732422
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "B. Defendant's Argument Is Wrong Because It Ignores The Fact That \nThe Ex Post Facto Clause Is Inapplicable To A Non-Punitive Civil \nRemedy.",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            127.29599999999999,
+            72.9
+          ],
+          [
+            529.4393310546875,
+            72.9
+          ],
+          [
+            529.4393310546875,
+            115.10302734375
+          ],
+          [
+            127.29599999999999,
+            115.10302734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "C. Section 2255's Remedy Is A Non-Punitive Civil Remedy",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            125.46000000000001,
+            372.6
+          ],
+          [
+            454.2457275390625,
+            372.6
+          ],
+          [
+            454.2457275390625,
+            388.863037109375
+          ],
+          [
+            125.46000000000001,
+            388.863037109375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "D. Conclusion",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            125.46000000000001,
+            207.36
+          ],
+          [
+            225.7025604248047,
+            207.36
+          ],
+          [
+            225.7025604248047,
+            222.7330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            125.46000000000001,
+            222.7330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "II. Defendant's Motion For A More Definite Statement Should Fail Because It Is \nInappropriate And Moot.",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            88.12799999999999,
+            566.1899999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            526.9148559570312,
+            566.1899999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            526.9148559570312,
+            595.8630218505859
+          ],
+          [
+            88.12799999999999,
+            595.8630218505859
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "III. Defendant's Motion To Strike Paragraphs 8 Through 15 Because They Don't \nPertain Strictly To The Plaintiff Should Be Denied.",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 9,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            91.18799999999999,
+            428.49
+          ],
+          [
+            528.98095703125,
+            428.49
+          ],
+          [
+            528.98095703125,
+            457.18353271484375
+          ],
+          [
+            91.18799999999999,
+            457.18353271484375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CONCLUSION",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 11,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            268.668,
+            236.9715576171875
+          ],
+          [
+            353.736,
+            236.9715576171875
+          ],
+          [
+            353.736,
+            250.4730224609375
+          ],
+          [
+            268.668,
+            250.4730224609375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 11,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            227.052,
+            541.08
+          ],
+          [
+            391.520263671875,
+            541.08
+          ],
+          [
+            391.520263671875,
+            554.6030120849609
+          ],
+          [
+            227.052,
+            554.6030120849609
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            45
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            23
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            65
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            33
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            67
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            31
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            60
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            68
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            29
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            85
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            34
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            63
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            57
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 9,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 10,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 11,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            61
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            30
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 12,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            49
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02732366"
+  }
+}

marker2/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732379/EFTA02732379.md

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO. 10-80447-CIV-Marra/
+
+C.L.,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## ORDER
+
+This matter came before the Court on Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S Unopposed Motion For Extension of Time in Which to File a Reply to Plaintiff's Response to Defendant Epstein's Motion for More Definite Statement & to Strike & to Dismiss Directed to Count III of Plaintiff C.L.'s Complaint (DE 9). Having considered Defendant's Unopposed Motion and Plaintiff's counsel being in agreement with the requested extension, it is HEREBY ORDERED and ADJUDGED that:
+
+Defendant's Unopposed Motion is GRANTED. Defendant shall file a Reply to Plaintiff C.L.'s Response in Opposition on or before June 17, 2010.
+
+DONE and ORDERED this day of , 2010.
+
+United States Magistrate Judge
+
+Courtesy Copies all counsel

marker2/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732379/EFTA02732379.metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732379.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 1,
+  "chars": 853,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 0.81,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            202.572,
+            78.57000000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            413.9052429199219,
+            78.57000000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            413.9052429199219,
+            106.11000000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            202.572,
+            106.11000000000001
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "ORDER",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            286.41600000000005,
+            244.61999999999998
+          ],
+          [
+            334.40911865234375,
+            244.61999999999998
+          ],
+          [
+            334.40911865234375,
+            257.58
+          ],
+          [
+            286.41600000000005,
+            257.58
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            166
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            23
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02732379"
+  }
+}

marker2/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732380/EFTA02732380.md

@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+C.L., vs. Plaintiff,
+
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO. 10-80447-CIV-Marraa
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant.
+
+## DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO FILE REPLY TO PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT & TO STRIKE & TO DISMISS DIRECTED TO COUNT III OF PLAINTIFF C.L.'S COMPLAINT (DE 91
+
+Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, (hereinafter "Epstein") by and through his undersigned attorneys, respectfully moves this Court for an extension of time in which to file his Reply to Plaintiff's Response to Defendant Epstein's Motion for More Definite Statement & to Strike & to Dismiss Directed to Count III of Plaintiff C.L.'s Complaint and as grounds therefore would state:
+
+- I. On May 3, 2010 Defendant filed his Motion for More Definite Statement & to Strike & to Dismiss Directed to Count III of Plaintiff C.L.'s Complaint (DE 5).
+- 2. On May 26, 2010 Plaintiff filed her Response in Opposition to Defendant's Motion (DE 9).
+- 3. There are several other cases filed with this Court in which Jeffrey Epstein is named aDefendant. In those cases, the undersigned has been handling other matters associated therewith.
+- 4. Additionally, the undersigned will be out of town on <sup>a</sup>prearranged family vacation beginning June 4, 2010 and will return to the office on June 8, 2010.
+
+5. An extension until June 17, 2010, is fair and reasonable under the circumstances. The undersigned is in need of the additional time in order to fully and adequately prepare a reply on behalf of the Defendant.
+
+6. As certified below, counsel for Defendant conferred with counsel for the Plaintiff by e-mail, and Plaintiff's counsel is in agreement with the requested extension.
+
+WHEREFORE Defendant respectfully requests that this Court enter an order granting an extension until June 17, 2010, to file a Reply to Plaintiff's Response in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for More Definite Statement & to Strike & to Dismiss Directed to Count HI of Plaintiff C.L.'s Complaint.
+
+## Local Rule 7.1 Statement
+
+Counsel for the movant conferred by e-mail with counsel for the Plaintiff and counsel for Plaintiff is in agreement with the requested extension until June 17, 2010 for Defendant to Reply to Plaintiff's Response in Opposition.
+
+> /s/ Robert D. Critton Jr. Robert D. Critton, Jr. Attorney for Defendant Epstein
+
+## Certificate of Service
+
+I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record identified on the following Service List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on this 4th day of June , 2010.
+
+Spencer T. Kuvin, Esq. (Fla. Bar No. 089737) skuvin@leopoldkuvin.com Gregory S. Weiss, Esq. (Fla. Bar No. 163430) gweiss@leopoldkuvin.com Leopold-Kuvin, P.A.
+
+2925 PGA Blvd., Suite 200 Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 Phone: (561) 515-1400 Fax: (561) 515-1401 Counsel for Plaintiff
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 561-659-8300 Fax: 561-835-8691 jagesqQbellsouth.net Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+By: /s/ Robert D. Critton, Jr. ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar No. 224162 rcrit@bciclaw.com MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ. Florida Bar #617296 moikeAbciclaw.com BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTHER & COLEMAN 303 Banyan Blvd., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561/842-2820 Phone 561/515-3148 Fax (Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein)

marker2/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732380/EFTA02732380.metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,235 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732380.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 3,
+  "chars": 3588,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 0.76,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            202.572,
+            74.52
+          ],
+          [
+            415.02142333984375,
+            74.52
+          ],
+          [
+            415.02142333984375,
+            102.65069580078125
+          ],
+          [
+            202.572,
+            102.65069580078125
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO FILE \nREPLY TO PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT EPSTEIN'S MOTION \nFOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT & TO STRIKE & TO DISMISS \nDIRECTED TO COUNT III OF PLAINTIFF C.L.'S COMPLAINT (DE 91",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            94.248,
+            238.14
+          ],
+          [
+            528.005859375,
+            238.14
+          ],
+          [
+            528.005859375,
+            292.40999999999997
+          ],
+          [
+            94.248,
+            292.40999999999997
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Local Rule 7.1 Statement",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            248.47200000000004,
+            324.81000000000006
+          ],
+          [
+            373.492919921875,
+            324.81000000000006
+          ],
+          [
+            373.492919921875,
+            341.60302734375
+          ],
+          [
+            248.47200000000004,
+            341.60302734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Certificate of Service",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            254.59199999999998,
+            529.74
+          ],
+          [
+            368.67791748046875,
+            529.74
+          ],
+          [
+            368.67791748046875,
+            546.7330169677734
+          ],
+          [
+            254.59199999999998,
+            546.7330169677734
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            262
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            29
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            59
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            29
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            61
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            31
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02732380"
+  }
+}

marker2/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732383/EFTA02732383.md

@@ -0,0 +1,262 @@
+# UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO. 10-80447-CIV-Marra/Johns
+
+C.L.,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+VS.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+FILED by D C
+
+JUN 14 2010
+
+STEVEN M. LARIMORE CLERK U.S. DIST. CT. S.D. OF FLA. • W.P.B.
+
+Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein's Emergency Motion For Protective Order, Motion to Quash and Motion for Attorneys' Fees, With Incorporated Memorandum Of Law
+
+Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, (hereinafter "EPSTEIN") by and through his undersigned attorneys, hereby files his Emergency Motion For Protective Order, Motion to Quash and Motion for Attorneys' fees and Costs, With Incorporated Memorandum Of Law. In support, Defendant states as follows:
+
+1. As this Court is well aware, these cases have been consolidated for discovery. However, on April 1, 2010, Plaintiff's counsel, Spencer Kuvin, filed C.L. v. Epstein, Case No. 10-80447-cv-Marra/Johnson, and that case has not been consolidated with the other related cases for purposes of discovery.
+
+2. On April 20, 2010, Mr. Kuvin served Maritza Milagros Vasquez with a subpoena for deposition, which is set to occur tomorrow. See Exhibit "A". However, this Notice and subpoena for deposition must be stricken/quashed as Mr. Kuvin, on behalf of his client, has failed to comply with Fed.R.Civ.P. 26 (d). That rule states, in pertinent part, that: "[a] party may not seek discovery from any source before the parties have conferred as required by Rule 26(f). . . ." Mr. Kuvin, on behalf of his client, has not complied with Rule 26(f) and, therefore, the subpoena for deposition must be stricken/quashed and <sup>a</sup> Protective Order should be entered pursuant to Rule 26(c) forbidding the deposition from occurring for non-compliance with the applicable rules. In Varo, Inc. v. Litton Systems Inc., 129 F.R.D. 139, 141 (N.D. TX 1989), the court held that one cannot be compelled to comply with awithdrawn subpoena. Id. Likewise, the court here cannot compel Maritza Milagros Vasquez to attend any deposition when the subpoena itself is invalid, especially when it will require those involved in these matters to incur substantial attorneys' fees.
+
+3. Next, Mr. Brad , counsel for Jane Doe, cross-noticed Maritza Milagros Vasquez's deposition in Jane Doe (#08-80893 — Exhibit "B"), which matter is already set for trial in July 2010. Discovery concluded on May 31, 2010 (see DE 531). Accordingly, the cross notice served by Jane Doe must be stricken/quashed and <sup>a</sup> protective order entered because the subpoena itself in invalid due to C.L.'s counsel's failure to comply with Rule 26(d) and discovery in Jane Doe (80893) has concluded.
+
+#### Rule 7.1 Certification
+
+<sup>I</sup>hereby certify that counsel for the respective parties communicated by e-mail in <sup>a</sup> good faith effort to resolve the issues set forth above prior to the filing of this Motion and none of the issues were resolved.
+
+WHEREFORE, Defendant requests that this Court enter an order granting Defendant's motion for protective order and motion to quash. Defendant further requests that this Court award his attorney's fees and costs associated with this motion, in accordance with Rule 37, Fed.R.Civ.P. and applicable Local Rules and specifically:
+
+- a. Quash CL's subpoena attached as Exhibit "A";
+- b. Quash and/or strike Jane Doe's cross notice as to Exhibit "A" because Exhibit "A" is invalid and discovery has concluded in Jane Doe;
+- c. Award attorneys to Defendant for CL and Jane Doe's noncompliance with these discovery matters; and
+- d. for such other and further relief as this court deems just and proper.
+
+By: MICHAEL , ESQ. Florida Bar #617296
+
+# Certificate of Service
+
+I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record identified on the following Service List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on this 4th day of June , 2010.
+
+Spencer T. Kuvin, Esq. (Fla. Bar No. 089737)
+
+skuvin@leopoldkuvin.com
+
+Gregory S. Weiss, Esq. (Fla. Bar No. 163430)
+
+gweiss(4Ieopoldkuvin.com
+
+Leopold-Kuvin, P.A.
+
+2925 PGA Blvd., Suite 200
+
+Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410
+
+Phone: (561) 515-1400
+
+Fax: (561) 515-1401
+
+Counsel for Plaintiff
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq.
+
+Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
+
+250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400
+
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012
+
+561-659-8300
+
+Fax: 561-835-8691
+
+jasteso@bellsouth.net
+
+Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
+
+Respectfully ubmitted,
+
+By: ROBERT D. C ON, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar No. 224162
+
+rcrit@bciclaw.com
+
+MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ.
+
+Florida Bar #617296
+
+mpike@bc1claw.com
+
+BURMAN, CRI1TON, LUTT1ER & COLEMAN
+
+303 Banyan Blvd., Suite 400
+
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401
+
+561/842-2820 Phone
+
+561/515-3148 Fax
+
+(Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein)
+
+AO 88A (Rev. 06/09) Subpoena to Testify at a Deposition in a Civil Action
+
+# UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
+
+for the
+
+Southern District of Florida
+
+C.L.
+
+Plaintiff
+
+v.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN
+
+Defendant
+
+Civil Action No. 10-80447-cv-Marral [REDACTED]
+
+(If the action is pending in another district, state where:
+
+## SUBPOENA TO TESTIFY AT A DEPOSITION IN A CIVIL ACTION
+
+To: MARITZA MILAGROS VASQUEZ, 1253 SW 21ST TERRACE, APT 21, MIAMI, FL 33145-2922
+
+Testimony: **YOU ARE COMMANDED** to appear at the time, date, and place set forth below to testify at a deposition to be taken in this civil action. If you are an organization that is *not* a party in this case, you must designate one or more officers, directors, or managing agents, or designate other persons who consent to testify on your behalf about the following matters, or those set forth in an attachment:
+
+| Place: INTELLIGENT OFFICE, 701 BRICKELL AVENUE,<br>SUITE 1550, MIAMI, FL 33131 | Date and Time:<br>05/18/2010 10:00 am |
+|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
+|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
+
+The deposition will be recorded by this method: VIDEOGRAPHER AND COURT REPORTER
+
+Production: You, or your representatives, must also bring with you to the deposition the following documents, electronically stored information, or objects, and permit their inspection, copying, testing, or sampling of the material:
+
+The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(c), relating to your protection as a person subject to a subpoena, and Rule 45 (d) and (e), relating to your duty to respond to this subpoena and the potential consequences of not doing so, are attached.
+
+Date: 04/08/2010
+
+CLERK OF COURT
+
+![]()Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk
+
+Attorney's signature
+
+The name, address, e-mail, and telephone number of the attorney representing (name of party) C.L.  
+SPENCER T. KUVIN, ESQ., LEOPOLD-KUVIN, P.A., 2925 PGA BOULEVARD, SUITE 200, PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA 33410  
+T: 561-515-1400 F: 561-515-1401
+
+"A"
+
+AO ISA (Rev. OVO9)Subpoena to Testify at <sup>e</sup>Deposition in aCtv d Action (Page 2)
+
+Civil Action No. 10-80447-ay-Menai.=
+
+#### PROOF OF SERVICE
+
+(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed IL Cht P. 45.)
+
+This subpoena for (name we individual and tide, (fan)) was received by me on (date)
+
+<sup>O</sup>I served the subpoena by delivering a copy to the named individual as follows:
+
+on (daft) ; or
+
+O I returned the subpoena =executed because:
+
+Unless the subpoena was issued on behalf of the United States, or one of its officers or agents, I have also tendered to the witness fees for one day's attendance, and the mileage allowed by law, in the amount of \$
+
+My fees are \$ for travel and S for services, for a total of S 0.00
+
+Date:
+
+<sup>I</sup>declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true,
+
+Server's signature
+
+Animation and title
+
+Server's address
+
+Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:
+
+#### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+JANE DOE,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+Vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN, et al.
+
+Defendant.
+
+CASE NO. 08-CV-80893-CIV-MARRAIIIIIM
+
+Related Cases:
+
+08-80119, 08-80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80994, 08-80811, 08-80893, 09-80469, 09-80591, 09-80656, 09-80802, 09-81092
+
+### PLAINTIFF'S CROSS-NOTICE OF VIDEO DEPOSITION OF MARITZA MILAGROS VASQUEZ
+
+PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that plaintiff, Jane Doe, will take the video deposition by oral examination, of the persons named below, at the time, on the date, at the hour of the place indicated:
+
+| NAME                     | DATE AND TIME              | PLACE OF TAKING DEPOSITON                                                |
+|--------------------------|----------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
+| Maritza Milagros Vasquez | June 15, 2010 @<br>10:00AM | Intelligent Office<br>701 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1550<br>Miami, FL 33131 |
+
+upon oral examination before Videographer and a Notary Public, or any other notary public or officer authorized by law to take depositions in the State of Florida. The oral examination will continue from day to day until completed. The depositions are being
+
+If
+
+CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MARFtA
+
+taken for the purpose of discovery, for use at trial, or for such other purposes as are permitted under the Rules of Court.
+
+# CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
+
+I HEREBY CERTIFY that a copy of the foregoing was served by e-mail on May 12, 2010 to: See attached service list.
+
+> J. affe, We!slang, , Fistos & Lehrman, PL 425 N. Andrews Ave., Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 (954) 524-2820 (954) 524-2822 fax brad@pathtojustice.com
+
+By:
+
+Florida Bar No.: 542075
+
+CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MARRAME
+
+# SERVICE LIST
+
+Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein United States District Court - Southern District of Florida
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. Jqoldbercieraaqwpa.corn
+
+Robert D. Critton, Esq. rcritton bciclaw.com
+
+Isidro Manual isidrogarciaabellsouth.net
+
+Jack iphasearcylaw.com
+
+Katherine Warthen Ezell KEzell(joodhurst.com
+
+Michael James Pike MPike bciclaw.com
+
+Paul G. Cassell cassellp(alaw.utah.edu
+
+Richard Horace Willits lawyerswillits@aol.com
+
+Robert C. Josefsberg rjosefsberq(@podhurst.com
+
+Adam D. Horowitz ahorowitz sexabuseattornev.com
+
+Stuart S. Mermelstein ssmasexabuseattornev.com

marker2/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732383/EFTA02732383.metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,613 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732383.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 9,
+  "chars": 10256,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 9.38,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            198.645,
+            68.85000000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            414.2460632324219,
+            68.85000000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            414.2460632324219,
+            98.9031982421875
+          ],
+          [
+            198.645,
+            98.9031982421875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Rule 7.1 Certification",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            264.45000000000005,
+            374.22
+          ],
+          [
+            369.615,
+            374.22
+          ],
+          [
+            369.615,
+            386.37
+          ],
+          [
+            264.45000000000005,
+            386.37
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Certificate of Service",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            248.46000000000004,
+            140.13
+          ],
+          [
+            362.3669738769531,
+            140.13
+          ],
+          [
+            362.3669738769531,
+            154.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            248.46000000000004,
+            154.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            185.73,
+            86.67
+          ],
+          [
+            434.18999999999994,
+            86.67
+          ],
+          [
+            434.18999999999994,
+            106.92
+          ],
+          [
+            185.73,
+            106.92
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "SUBPOENA TO TESTIFY AT A DEPOSITION IN A CIVIL ACTION",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            159.285,
+            224.37
+          ],
+          [
+            467.40000000000003,
+            224.37
+          ],
+          [
+            467.40000000000003,
+            240.57
+          ],
+          [
+            159.285,
+            240.57
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "PROOF OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            258.91499999999996,
+            111.78000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            362.97320556640625,
+            111.78000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            362.97320556640625,
+            123.309814453125
+          ],
+          [
+            258.91499999999996,
+            123.309814453125
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            210.32999999999998,
+            87.48
+          ],
+          [
+            405.28499999999997,
+            87.48
+          ],
+          [
+            405.28499999999997,
+            113.4
+          ],
+          [
+            210.32999999999998,
+            113.4
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "PLAINTIFF'S CROSS-NOTICE OF VIDEO DEPOSITION OF \nMARITZA MILAGROS VASQUEZ",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            153.135,
+            396.90000000000003
+          ],
+          [
+            466.01885986328125,
+            396.90000000000003
+          ],
+          [
+            466.01885986328125,
+            423.63
+          ],
+          [
+            153.135,
+            423.63
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            232.46999999999997,
+            186.3
+          ],
+          [
+            382.3164978027344,
+            186.3
+          ],
+          [
+            382.3164978027344,
+            200.68353271484375
+          ],
+          [
+            232.46999999999997,
+            200.68353271484375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "SERVICE LIST",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            264.45000000000005,
+            132.03000000000003
+          ],
+          [
+            346.3047180175781,
+            132.03000000000003
+          ],
+          [
+            346.3047180175781,
+            146.60999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            264.45000000000005,
+            146.60999999999999
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            319
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            34
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            13
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            366
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            81
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            39
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            15
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            374
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            46
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            40
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "Form",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Table",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            203
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            22
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            15
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            189
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            31
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            11
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Table",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            37
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            19
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            112
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            29
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            13
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02732383"
+  }
+}

marker2/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732392/EFTA02732392.md

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+•
+
+C. L.,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+CASE NO: 10-80447-cv-Marra/M
+
+## PLAINTIFF. C.L.'S NOTICE OF WITHDRAWING SUBPOENA SERVED ON MARITZA MILAGROS VASQUEZ
+
+Plaintiff; C.L., by and through her undersigned counsel, hereby gives notice of withdrawing the Subpoena for Deposition directed to Maritza Milagros Vasquez and, further, gives notice of canceling the deposition of Maritza Milagros Vasquez scheduled for June 15, 2010.
+
+## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
+
+June 14;2010, teleetrrittivallyilittrthrforepin document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being'served this day on all counsel of record or pro se parties identified on the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those counsel or parties who are not authorized to receive electronically.
+
+s/SPENCER T. KUVIN SPENCER T. KUVIN (Florida Bar No.: 089737) Email: skuvinQleopoldkuvin.com Leopold—Kuvin, P.A. 2925 PGA Boulevard, Suite 200 Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 (561) 515-1400; (561) 515-1401 (facsimile) Attorneys for Plaintiff

marker2/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732392/EFTA02732392.metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732392.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 1,
+  "chars": 1239,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 0.72,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            216.036,
+            75.33
+          ],
+          [
+            416.9367980957031,
+            75.33
+          ],
+          [
+            416.9367980957031,
+            104.36248779296875
+          ],
+          [
+            216.036,
+            104.36248779296875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "PLAINTIFF. C.L.'S NOTICE OF WITHDRAWING SUBPOENA SERVED \nON MARITZA MILAGROS VASQUEZ",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            105.87599999999998,
+            337.77
+          ],
+          [
+            504.1640319824219,
+            337.77
+          ],
+          [
+            504.1640319824219,
+            367.61248779296875
+          ],
+          [
+            105.87599999999998,
+            367.61248779296875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            220.93199999999996,
+            489.23999999999995
+          ],
+          [
+            387.3881530761719,
+            489.23999999999995
+          ],
+          [
+            387.3881530761719,
+            505.61248779296875
+          ],
+          [
+            220.93199999999996,
+            505.61248779296875
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            63
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            32
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02732392"
+  }
+}

marker2/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732393/EFTA02732393.md

@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO. 10-CIV-80447-MARRA/-
+
+C.L.,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+I
+
+## ORDER
+
+THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Defendant's Emergency Motion for Protective Order, Motion to Quash and Motion for Attorney's Fees filed June 14, 2010 (D.E.#12). Having reviewed the pleadings filed incident to this matter and being otherwise duly advised in the premises, it is hereby
+
+ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendant's Emergency Motion for Protective Order, Motion to Quash and Motion for Attorney's Fees, filed June 14, 2010 (D.E. #12) is DENIED AS MOOT based on the representation from the Defendant's counsel's office that the issue has been resolved and C.L. has agreed to a continuance of the deposition.
+
+DONE AND ORDERED this June 15, 2010, in at West Palm Beach,
+
+Florida. <sup>O</sup>ft\_ty-to /177c54,01.--- LINNEA R. JOH ON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
+
+CC: The Honorable Kenneth A. Marra All Counsel of Record

marker2/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732393/EFTA02732393.metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732393.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 1,
+  "chars": 989,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 0.76,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            198.89999999999998,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            407.5008544921875,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            407.5008544921875,
+            100.18353271484375
+          ],
+          [
+            198.89999999999998,
+            100.18353271484375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "ORDER",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            281.52,
+            297.27
+          ],
+          [
+            330.8534240722656,
+            297.27
+          ],
+          [
+            330.8534240722656,
+            312.80352783203125
+          ],
+          [
+            281.52,
+            312.80352783203125
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            54
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02732393"
+  }
+}

marker2/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732394/EFTA02732394.md

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO. 10-80447-civ-MARRA1
+
+C.L.,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## ORDER OF REFERENCE
+
+In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636 and the Magistrate Rules of the Local Rules of the Southern District of Florida, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the abovecaptioned cause is REFERRED to United States Magistrate Judge Linnea R. for appropriate disposition of all pretrial discovery motions, and all motions that relate directly to these motions, such as motions for extension of time, motions for reconsideration, motions for sanctions, and motions for mental or physical examinations.
+
+DONE AND ORDERED in at West Palm Beach. Palm Bcach County, Florida, this 14th day of June, 2010.
+
+> KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge
+
+copies to:
+
+All counsel of record Magistrate Judge Linnea R.

marker2/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732394/EFTA02732394.metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732394.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 1,
+  "chars": 871,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 0.95,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            206.856,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            405.5581359863281,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            405.5581359863281,
+            100.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            206.856,
+            100.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "ORDER OF REFERENCE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            233.784,
+            298.08
+          ],
+          [
+            379.142822265625,
+            298.08
+          ],
+          [
+            379.142822265625,
+            313.4830627441406
+          ],
+          [
+            233.784,
+            313.4830627441406
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            52
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            11
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02732394"
+  }
+}

marker2/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732395/EFTA02732395.md

@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO. 10-CV- 80447- MARRA
+
+C.L.,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## FINAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
+
+THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the parties' Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice. The Court has reviewed the Stipulation, the pertinent portions of the record, and is otherwise advised in the premises. In accordance with the parties' Stipulation, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:
+
+- 1. The above-styled action is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
+- 2. All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT.
+- 3. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the parties' settlement.
+- 4. The Clerk shall CLOSE THIS CASE.
+
+DONE AND ORDERED at Palm Beach County Courthouse, West Palm Beach, Florida, this day of 2010.
+
+> KENNETH A. MARRA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
+
+Copies furnished:
+
+ROBERT D. CRITTON, ESQ., and MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ., 303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401, and THEODORE J. LEOPOLD, ESQ. AND SPENCER T. KUVIN, ESQ., Leopold-Kuvin, P.A., 2925 PGA Boulevard, Suite 200, Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410, JACK A. GOLDBERGER, ESQ. Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A., 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401

marker2/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732395/EFTA02732395.metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732395.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 1,
+  "chars": 1267,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 0.82,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            203.18400000000003,
+            98.01
+          ],
+          [
+            413.120849609375,
+            98.01
+          ],
+          [
+            413.120849609375,
+            126.80352783203125
+          ],
+          [
+            203.18400000000003,
+            126.80352783203125
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "FINAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            166.46400000000003,
+            264.06000000000006
+          ],
+          [
+            450.7028503417969,
+            264.06000000000006
+          ],
+          [
+            450.7028503417969,
+            279.06353759765625
+          ],
+          [
+            166.46400000000003,
+            279.06353759765625
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            59
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            30
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02732395"
+  }
+}

marker2/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732396/EFTA02732396.md

@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO.: 10-CV-80447-MARRA-
+
+C.L.
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+v.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
+
+Plaintiff, C.L. and Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, (collectively, "Parties"), by and through their undersigned counsel and pursuant to Rule 41(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby stipulate to the dismissal of this action with prejudice, each party to bear their own fees and costs. The Parties further stipulate that the Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Parties' settlement.
+
+Dated this \_slay,of June, 2010
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTHER & COLEMAN, LLP Attorneys for Jeff Ep tein
+
+By: ROBERT D. C ITTON, JR., ESQ. Florida Bar N . 224162 rcriabcIclaw.com 303 Banyan Boulevard Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561/842-2820 Phone 561/515-3148 Fax
+
+LEOPOLD-KWVIN, P.A. Attorner'for" .L.
+
+By: SPENCER 77: IN, ESQ. Florida -gar No. 089737 skuvinakuvinlaw.com Leopold-Kuvin, P.A. 2925 PGA Blvd., Suite 200 Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 Phone: (561) 515-1400 Fax: 561 697 2383
+
+**Certificate of Service**
+
+I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record identified on the following Service List in the manner specified by CM/ECF on this 23<sup>rd</sup> day of June, 2010:
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+By: /s/ Robert D. Critton, Jr.  
+ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ.  
+Florida Bar No. 224162  
+rcrit@bclclaw.com  
+MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ.  
+Florida Bar No.617296  
+mpike@bclclaw.com  
+BURMAN,CRITTON,LUTTIER & COLEMAN,LLP  
+303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400  
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401  
+561/842-2820 Phone  
+561/515-3148 Fax  
+(*Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein*)
+
+Spencer T. Kuvin, Esq.  
+Florida Bar No. 089737  
+skuvin@leopoldkuvin.com  
+Gregory S. Weiss, Esq.  
+Florida Bar No. 163430  
+gweiss@leopoldkuvin.com  
+Leopold-Kuvin, P.A.  
+2925 PGA Blvd., Suite 200  
+Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410  
+Phone: (561) 515-1400  
+Fax: (561) 515-1401  
+*Attorneys for C.L.*
+
+Jack Alan Goldberger  
+Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.  
+250 Australian Avenue South  
+Suite 1400  
+West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012  
+561-659-8300  
+Fax: 561-835-8691  
+jagesq@bellsouth.net  
+*Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein*

marker2/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732396/EFTA02732396.metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,162 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732396.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 2,
+  "chars": 2404,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 5.34,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            203.796,
+            87.48
+          ],
+          [
+            415.0253601074219,
+            87.48
+          ],
+          [
+            415.0253601074219,
+            117.91998291015625
+          ],
+          [
+            203.796,
+            117.91998291015625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            169.524,
+            317.52
+          ],
+          [
+            452.2620544433594,
+            317.52
+          ],
+          [
+            452.2620544433594,
+            333.53997802734375
+          ],
+          [
+            169.524,
+            333.53997802734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Certificate of Service",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            244.8,
+            72.9
+          ],
+          [
+            368.424,
+            72.9
+          ],
+          [
+            368.424,
+            86.67
+          ],
+          [
+            244.8,
+            86.67
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            82
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            41
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            13
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02732396"
+  }
+}

marker2/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732398/EFTA02732398.md

@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
+
+CASE NO. 10-CV- 80447- MARRA
+
+C.L.,
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+vs.
+
+JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant.
+
+## FINAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
+
+THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the parties' Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice. The Court has reviewed the Stipulation, the pertinent portions of the record, and is otherwise advised in the premises. In accordance with the parties' Stipulation, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:
+
+- 1. The above-styled action is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
+- 2. All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT.
+- 3. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the parties' settlement.
+- 4. The Clerk shall CLOSE THIS CASE.
+
+DONE AND ORDERED at Palm Beach County Courthouse, West Palm Beach, Florida, this .2•Y clay of :3-v.-it 2010.
+
+> KENNETH A. MARRA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
+
+Copies furnished:
+
+ROBERT D. CRITTON, ESQ., and MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ., 303 Banyan Boulevard, Suite 400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401, and THEODORE J. LEOPOLD, ESQ. AND SPENCER T. KUVIN, ESQ., Leopold-Kuvin, P.A., 2925 PGA Boulevard, Suite 200, Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410, JACK A. GOLDBERGER, ESQ. Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A., 250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401

marker2/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732398/EFTA02732398.metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732398.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 1,
+  "chars": 1282,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 0.8,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            200.49,
+            110.92889404296875
+          ],
+          [
+            399.8756103515625,
+            110.92889404296875
+          ],
+          [
+            399.8756103515625,
+            138.80352783203125
+          ],
+          [
+            200.49,
+            138.80352783203125
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "FINAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            166.05,
+            268.05889892578125
+          ],
+          [
+            436.3408203125,
+            268.05889892578125
+          ],
+          [
+            436.3408203125,
+            283.18353271484375
+          ],
+          [
+            166.05,
+            283.18353271484375
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            61
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            30
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02732398"
+  }
+}

marker2/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/ocr-manifest.json

@@ -0,0 +1,484 @@
+{
+  "source_dir": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447",
+  "output_dir": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447",
+  "created_at": "2026-09-18T03:57:29.873229+00:00",
+  "updated_at": "2026-09-18T05:03:41.256827+00:00",
+  "tasks": {
+    "8fdeb8644bb9c83353420dedcd24601b6ee063a6d18065b609dfc86fedace7a7": {
+      "sha": "8fdeb8644bb9c83353420dedcd24601b6ee063a6d18065b609dfc86fedace7a7",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732320.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02732320.pdf",
+      "size": 380920,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 3,
+      "chars": 13182,
+      "elapsed": 22.336378174019046,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732320/EFTA02732320.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "da67ac8dac4de745bb0475a920466bb73ad70506fecdca71b9b8b94f8655813f": {
+      "sha": "da67ac8dac4de745bb0475a920466bb73ad70506fecdca71b9b8b94f8655813f",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732323.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02732323.pdf",
+      "size": 170331,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 2,
+      "chars": 2302,
+      "elapsed": 1.2976351989200339,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732323/EFTA02732323.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "635350309ea6d34acae56f0f7ea73a225b2f339bf83192f9b99d3a4218833935": {
+      "sha": "635350309ea6d34acae56f0f7ea73a225b2f339bf83192f9b99d3a4218833935",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732325.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02732325.pdf",
+      "size": 1460607,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 12,
+      "chars": 21274,
+      "elapsed": 1.715628404985182,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732325/EFTA02732325.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "84c50bf01d358268a5b6f21333e83d7e254be900da0f04cc6de59dc7611f977c": {
+      "sha": "84c50bf01d358268a5b6f21333e83d7e254be900da0f04cc6de59dc7611f977c",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732337.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02732337.pdf",
+      "size": 194805,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 2,
+      "chars": 2368,
+      "elapsed": 1.2275322469649836,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732337/EFTA02732337.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "638a2acb5d268c041087396badf188377733c905f0469c77866adc26939ae0a6": {
+      "sha": "638a2acb5d268c041087396badf188377733c905f0469c77866adc26939ae0a6",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732339.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02732339.pdf",
+      "size": 173094,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 2,
+      "chars": 2700,
+      "elapsed": 0.744916110066697,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732339/EFTA02732339.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "d6fadadb1746dd97a0a2c882350c0f08188db54ca9139351dcdf2fa5be0ae2ed": {
+      "sha": "d6fadadb1746dd97a0a2c882350c0f08188db54ca9139351dcdf2fa5be0ae2ed",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732341.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02732341.pdf",
+      "size": 3305980,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 22,
+      "chars": 49192,
+      "elapsed": 14.684000907000154,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732341/EFTA02732341.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "83fa804d216c18620b7d6dbb407fc3223cc6dde27fb7df67fd59a9def99f85b2": {
+      "sha": "83fa804d216c18620b7d6dbb407fc3223cc6dde27fb7df67fd59a9def99f85b2",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732363.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02732363.pdf",
+      "size": 488554,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 3,
+      "chars": 3812,
+      "elapsed": 6.929362494964153,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732363/EFTA02732363.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "88207df21d531af39bd71b8372734944eacf969281dc9967526a61c7f6112c29": {
+      "sha": "88207df21d531af39bd71b8372734944eacf969281dc9967526a61c7f6112c29",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732366.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02732366.pdf",
+      "size": 3149387,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 13,
+      "chars": 26216,
+      "elapsed": 6.086650265962817,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732366/EFTA02732366.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "1e0d1d190fc4d539169507d8b5aa0484b678e7b3eefdb5c9814fe7ffa6f002f2": {
+      "sha": "1e0d1d190fc4d539169507d8b5aa0484b678e7b3eefdb5c9814fe7ffa6f002f2",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732379.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02732379.pdf",
+      "size": 73584,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 1,
+      "chars": 853,
+      "elapsed": 0.805031624971889,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732379/EFTA02732379.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "d965cabfaab10c15a06493048b09eea17482513688e2d4af46f7de1416cf45c1": {
+      "sha": "d965cabfaab10c15a06493048b09eea17482513688e2d4af46f7de1416cf45c1",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732380.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02732380.pdf",
+      "size": 280839,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 3,
+      "chars": 3588,
+      "elapsed": 0.7618529649917036,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732380/EFTA02732380.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "22ab17cb56d19a31ea9581b76135f76e484686af2289e702b026c519f6db5484": {
+      "sha": "22ab17cb56d19a31ea9581b76135f76e484686af2289e702b026c519f6db5484",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732383.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02732383.pdf",
+      "size": 811443,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 9,
+      "chars": 10256,
+      "elapsed": 9.383837299072184,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732383/EFTA02732383.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "3597bff5f3de4348a6f78152ccf56aa906d740c49cb0a082357c90c265a5b5c3": {
+      "sha": "3597bff5f3de4348a6f78152ccf56aa906d740c49cb0a082357c90c265a5b5c3",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732392.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02732392.pdf",
+      "size": 116974,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 1,
+      "chars": 1239,
+      "elapsed": 0.7165553550003096,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732392/EFTA02732392.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "3755349277d810f8ae81c7314fa5ac5ee285a48f09623ee82ee49cccee692e5d": {
+      "sha": "3755349277d810f8ae81c7314fa5ac5ee285a48f09623ee82ee49cccee692e5d",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732393.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02732393.pdf",
+      "size": 77864,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 1,
+      "chars": 989,
+      "elapsed": 0.7608462459174916,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732393/EFTA02732393.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "652542cc0ca03d522c74b3389c23c6798ca99dd37f60cc6660fc4563c5c42ef2": {
+      "sha": "652542cc0ca03d522c74b3389c23c6798ca99dd37f60cc6660fc4563c5c42ef2",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732394.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02732394.pdf",
+      "size": 64519,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 1,
+      "chars": 871,
+      "elapsed": 0.9492916379822418,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732394/EFTA02732394.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "12486b4488755b5499261abf7c0d34177645f134890d29a338b5099c70189a8a": {
+      "sha": "12486b4488755b5499261abf7c0d34177645f134890d29a338b5099c70189a8a",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732395.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02732395.pdf",
+      "size": 110574,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 1,
+      "chars": 1267,
+      "elapsed": 0.8171006010379642,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732395/EFTA02732395.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "dc8408022d42e73772d3e950baf63dd200100f1a5ea09aeed3b297942b89695a": {
+      "sha": "dc8408022d42e73772d3e950baf63dd200100f1a5ea09aeed3b297942b89695a",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732396.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02732396.pdf",
+      "size": 214793,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 2,
+      "chars": 2404,
+      "elapsed": 5.338342446018942,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732396/EFTA02732396.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    },
+    "f7f64cb931224ef70dddb6de6555ec3c3e4a7f0fdc1d34057c649bfe344fc714": {
+      "sha": "f7f64cb931224ef70dddb6de6555ec3c3e4a7f0fdc1d34057c649bfe344fc714",
+      "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732398.pdf",
+      "name": "EFTA02732398.pdf",
+      "size": 109227,
+      "status": "done",
+      "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+      "engine": {
+        "marker_major": "2",
+        "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+        "mode": "balanced",
+        "use_llm": false,
+        "force_ocr": false,
+        "disable_ocr": false,
+        "output_format": "markdown",
+        "preserve_source": false
+      },
+      "worker": null,
+      "claimed_at": null,
+      "pages": 1,
+      "chars": 1282,
+      "elapsed": 0.7980279539478943,
+      "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-epstein-80447/EFTA02732398/EFTA02732398.md",
+      "error": "",
+      "backend": "local",
+      "attempts": 1,
+      "warnings": []
+    }
+  }
+}