robbd commited on
Commit
7c60066
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 682cea2

MEMY-1805 marker2 court-doe-v-epstein-80069 (salt 4090): 31/31

Browse files
Files changed (31) hide show
  1. marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743481/EFTA02743481.md +211 -0
  2. marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743481/EFTA02743481.metadata.json +575 -0
  3. marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743481/_page_0_Picture_12.jpeg +3 -0
  4. marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743481/_page_6_Picture_671.jpeg +3 -0
  5. marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743488/EFTA02743488.md +57 -0
  6. marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743488/EFTA02743488.metadata.json +113 -0
  7. marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743489/EFTA02743489.md +39 -0
  8. marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743489/EFTA02743489.metadata.json +151 -0
  9. marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743491/EFTA02743491.md +46 -0
  10. marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743491/EFTA02743491.metadata.json +219 -0
  11. marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743491/_page_1_Picture_11.jpeg +3 -0
  12. marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743491/_page_2_Picture_11.jpeg +3 -0
  13. marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743494/EFTA02743494.md +55 -0
  14. marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743494/EFTA02743494.metadata.json +151 -0
  15. marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743496/EFTA02743496.md +86 -0
  16. marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743496/EFTA02743496.metadata.json +491 -0
  17. marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743503/EFTA02743503.md +62 -0
  18. marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743503/EFTA02743503.metadata.json +212 -0
  19. marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743506/EFTA02743506.md +178 -0
  20. marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743506/EFTA02743506.metadata.json +570 -0
  21. marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743506/_page_0_Picture_107.jpeg +3 -0
  22. marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743506/_page_3_Picture_17.jpeg +3 -0
  23. marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743512/EFTA02743512.md +80 -0
  24. marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743512/EFTA02743512.metadata.json +461 -0
  25. marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743517/EFTA02743517.md +37 -0
  26. marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743517/EFTA02743517.metadata.json +170 -0
  27. marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743519/EFTA02743519.md +49 -0
  28. marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743519/EFTA02743519.metadata.json +170 -0
  29. marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743521/EFTA02743521.md +27 -0
  30. marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743521/EFTA02743521.metadata.json +117 -0
  31. marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/ocr-manifest.json +344 -0
marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743481/EFTA02743481.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,211 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
2
+
3
+ CASE NO.:
4
+
5
+ JANE DOE NO. 1, by and through JANE DOE's FATHER as parent and natural guardian, and JANE DOE's FATHER, and JANE DOE's STEPMOTHER, individually,
6
+
7
+ Plaintiffs,
8
+
9
+ vs.
10
+
11
+ JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
12
+
13
+ Defendant.
14
+
15
+ ![](_page_0_Picture_12.jpeg)
16
+
17
+ 08- 80069
18
+
19
+ CJV-MARRA
20
+
21
+ MAGI itarag
22
+
23
+ #### COMPLAINT
24
+
25
+ Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. I ("Jane" or "Jane Doc"), by and through Jane Doe's Father as parent and natural guardian, and Jane Doe's Father and Jane Doe's Stepmother, individually, bring this Complaint against Jeffrey Epstein, as follows:
26
+
27
+ #### Parties, Jurisdiction and Venue
28
+
29
+ - 1. Jane Doe is acitizen and resident of the State of Florida. She is aminor under the age of 18 years.
30
+ - 2. Jane Doe.
31
+ - 3. Jane Doe's Father brings this action individually and as parent and natural guardian of Jane Doe's Father is acitizen and resident of the State of Florida. Jane Doe's Stepmother brings this action individually. Jane Doe's Stepmother is <sup>a</sup> citizen and resident of the State of Florida.
32
+ - 4. This Complaint is brought under fictitious names to protect the identity of the Minor Plaintiff because this Complaint makes sensitive allegations of sexual assault and abuse upon <sup>a</sup>
33
+
34
+ minor.
35
+
36
+ - 5. Defendant Jeffrey Epstein is a citizen and resident of the State of New York.
37
+ - 6. This is an action for damages in excess of \$50 million.
38
+ - 7. This Court has jurisdiction of this action and the claims set forth herein pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1332(a), as the matter in controversy (i) exceeds \$75,000, exclusive of interest and costs; and (ii) is between citizens of different states.
39
+ - 8. This Court has venue of this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1391(a) as a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred in this District.
40
+
41
+ # Factual Allegations
42
+
43
+ 9. At all relevant times, Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") was an adult male, 52 years old. Epstein is a financier and money manager with a secret clientele limited exclusively to billionaires. He is himself a man of tremendous wealth, power and influence. He maintains his principal home in New York and also owns residences in New Mexico, St. and Palm Beach, FL. The allegations herein concern Epstein's conduct while at his lavish estate in Palm Beach.
44
+
45
+ 10. Upon information and belief, Epstein has a sexual preference and obsession for underage minor girls. He engaged in a plan and scheme in which he gained access to primarily economically disadvantaged minor girls in his home, sexually assaulted these girls, and then gave them money. In or about 2005, Jane Doe, then 14 years old, fell into Epstein's trap and became one of his victims.
46
+
47
+ 11. Upon information and belief, Jeffrey Epstein carried out his scheme and assaulted girls in Florida, New York and on his private island, known as Little St. James, in St. a
48
+
49
+ 12. An integral player in Epstein's Florida scheme was , a Palm Beach
50
+
51
+ Community College student from Loxahatchee, Florida. She recruited girls ostensibly to give <sup>a</sup> wealthy man <sup>a</sup>massage for monetary compensation in his Palm Beach mansion. Under Epstein's <sup>p</sup>lan, would be contacted when Epstein was planning to be at his Palm Beach residence or soon after he had arrived there. Epstein or someone on his behalf directed to bring one or more underage girls to the residence. upon information and belief, generally sought out economically disadvantaged underage girls from Loxahatchee and surrounding areas who would be enticed by the money being offered - generally \$200 to \$300 per "massage" session - and who were perceived as less likely to complain to authorities or have credibility if allegations of improper conduct were made. This was an important element of Epstein's plan.
52
+
53
+ 13. Epstein's plan and scheme reflected aparticular pattern and method. Upon arrival at Epstein's mansion, Mr. would introduce each victim to , Epstein's assistant, who gathered the girl's personal information, including her name and telephone number. would then bring the girl up aflight of stairs to abedroom that contained <sup>a</sup>massage table in addition to other furnishings. There were photographs of nude women lining the stairway■ **and in the bedroom. would then leave the girl alone in this room, whereupon Epstein would enter wearing only a towel. He would then remove his towel, lay down naked on the massage table, and direct the girl to remove her clothes. He then would perform one or more lewd, lascivious and sexual acts, including masturbation and touching the girl's vagina with avibrator.**
54
+
55
+ **14. Consistent with the foregoing plan and scheme, recruited Jane Doe to give Epstein <sup>a</sup>massage for monetary compensation. brought Jane to Epstein's mansion in Palm Beach. Jane was introduced to , who led her up the flight of stairs to the room with the massage table. She was alone in the room when Epstein arrived wearing only a towel. He**
56
+
57
+ removed his towel, and laid down naked on the massage table. He demanded that Jane remove her clothes. In shock, fear and trepidation, Jane complied, removing her clothes except for her underwear. Epstein then sexually assaulted Jane.
58
+
59
+ IS. After Epstein had completed the assault, he left the room. Jane was then able to get dressed, leave the room and go back down the stairs. She then me' again who brought Jane home. Jane was paid \$300 by Epstein...MI was paid \$200 by Epstein for bringing Jane to him.
60
+
61
+ 16. As a result of this encounter with Epstein, the 14-year old Jane experienced confusion, shame, humiliation, embarrassment and the assault sent her life into a downward spiral.
62
+
63
+ #### COUNT I Sexual Assault
64
+
65
+ 17. Plaintiff Jane Doe by and through her Father, as parent and natural guardian, repeats and realleges paragraphs 1 through 16 above.
66
+
67
+ 18. Epstein tortiously assaulted Jane Doe sexually in or about 2005.
68
+
69
+ 19. This sexual assault was in violation of Chapter 800 of the Florida Statutes, which recognizes as a crime the lewd and lascivious acts committed by Epstein upon Jane.
70
+
71
+ 20. As a direct and proximate result of Epstein's assault on Jane, she has suffered and will continue to suffer severe and permanent traumatic injuries, including mental, psychological and emotional damages.
72
+
73
+ WHEREFORE, PlaintiffJane Doe, by and through her Father, as parent and natural guardian, demands judgment against Defendant Jeffrey Epstein for compensatory damages, punitive damages, costs, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper.
74
+
75
+ ## COUNT H Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress
76
+
77
+ 21. Plaintiffs Jane Doe by and through her Father, as parent and natural guardian, Jane Doe's Father and Jane Doe's Stepmother, individually, repeat and real lege paragraphs 1 through <sup>16</sup> above.
78
+
79
+ 22. Epstein's conduct was intentional or reckless.
80
+
81
+ 23. Epstein's conduct was outrageous, going beyond all bounds of decency.
82
+
83
+ 24. Epstein's conduct caused severe emotional distress not only to Jane Doe, but also to her parents, Jane Doe's Father and Jane Doe's Stepmother. Epstein knew or had reason to know that his intentional and outrageous conduct would cause emotional trauma and damage to Jane Doe's parents.
84
+
85
+ 25. As a direct and proximate result of Epstein's intentional or reckless conduct, Jane Doe, Jane Does' Father and Jane Doe's Stepmother have suffered and will continue to suffer severe mental anguish and pain.
86
+
87
+ WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs Jane Doe by and through her Father, as parent and natural guardian, Jane Doe's Father and Jane Doe's Stepmother demand judgment against Defendant Jeffrey Epstein for compensatory damages, costs, punitive damages, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper.
88
+
89
+ #### COUNT III Loss of Parental Consortium
90
+
91
+ 26. Plaintiff Jane Doe's Father repeats and realleges paragraphs 1 through 16 above.
92
+
93
+ 27. Epstein's tortious conduct is the direct and proximate cause of damages to Jane Doe's Father, consisting of parental loss of comfort, companionship and society and healthcare costs
94
+
95
+ associated with the treatment of Jane.
96
+
97
+ 28. Jane Doe's Father experienced and will continue to experience great mental anguish, pain and suffering from the time that Defendant's tortious conduct occurred.
98
+
99
+ WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Jane Doe's Father demands judgment for loss of consortium damages, costs and such other and further relief as this Court deems proper.
100
+
101
+ ### JURY TRIAL DEMAND
102
+
103
+ Plaintiffs demand a jury trial in this action.
104
+
105
+ Dated: January 24, 2008
106
+
107
+ Respectfully submitted,
108
+
109
+ HERMAN & MERMELSTEIN, P.A.
110
+ *Attorneys for Plaintiffs*
111
+ 18205 Biscayne Blvd.
112
+ Suite 2218
113
+ Miami, Florida 33160
114
+ Tel: 305-931-2200
115
+ Fax: 305-931-0877
116
+
117
+ By:
118
+
119
+ ![]()The JS-44 civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replace nor supplement the filing, and service of pleading or other papers as required by law, except as provided by local rules of court. This form, approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September 1974, is required for the use of the Clerk of the Court for the purpose of initiating the civil docket sheet. (SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON THE REVERSE OF THE FORM.)
120
+
121
+ I(a) PLAINTIFFS
122
+ **JANE DOE, by and through**
123
+ **JANE DOE's FATHER as parent and natural guardian, and JANE DOE's FATHER, and JANE DOE's STEPMOTHER, individually,**
124
+
125
+ (b) COUNTY OF RESIDENCE OF FIRST LISTED PLAINTIFF
126
+ **PALM BEACH COUNTY**
127
+ (EXCEPT IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES)
128
+
129
+ (c) ATTORNEYS (FIRM NAME, ADDRESS, AND TELEPHONE NUMBER)
130
+ **Herman & Mermelstein, P.A., 18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218, Miami, FL 33160, (305) 931-2200**
131
+
132
+ DEFENDANTS
133
+ **JEFFREY EPSTEIN**
134
+
135
+ COUNTY OF RESIDENCE OF FIRST LISTED DEFENDANT NEW YORK
136
+ (IN U.S. PLAINTIFF CASES ONLY)
137
+
138
+ **08-80069**
139
+
140
+ ATTORNEYS (IF KNOWN)
141
+
142
+ **CIV-MARRA**
143
+
144
+ (d) CIRCLE COUNTY WHERE ACTION AROSE: **PALM BEACH**
145
+
146
+ *JORCV 80069-Kam Johnson*
147
+
148
+ **II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION**
149
+
150
+ (PLACE AN X ONE BOX ONLY)
151
+
152
+ - 1. U.S. Government 3. Federal Question
153
+ Plaintiff (U.S. Government Not a Party)
154
+ - 2. U.S. Government 4. Diversity
155
+ Defendant (Indicate Citizenship of Parties in Item)
156
+
157
+ **III. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES**
158
+
159
+ (For Diversity Case Only)
160
+
161
+ - Citizen of This State 1 1
162
+ - Citizen of Another State 2 2
163
+ - Citizen or Subject of a Foreign Country 3 3
164
+
165
+ - PLACE AN X IN ONE BOX FOR PLAINTIFF AND ONE FOR DEFENDANT PTF 4 4 4
166
+ - Incorporated of Principal Place of Business in This State 5 5
167
+ - Incorporated and Principal Place of Business in Another State 6 6
168
+ - Foreign Nation 6 6
169
+
170
+ **IV. CAUSE OF ACTION**
171
+
172
+ (CITE THE U.S. CIVIL STATUTE UNDER WHICH YOU ARE FILING AND WRITE A BRIEF STATEMENT OF CAUSE.)
173
+
174
+ DO NOT CITE JURISDICTIONAL STATUTES UNLESS DIVERSITY.)
175
+ **DIVERSITY ACTION UNDER 28 U.S.C. §1332(a) FOR SEXUAL ASSAULT**
176
+
177
+ **IVa. 5 days estimated (for both sides) to try entire case**
178
+
179
+ **V. NATURE OF SUIT**
180
+
181
+ (PLACE AN X IN ONE BOX ONLY)
182
+
183
+ | A CONTRACT | A TORTS | B FORFEITURE PENALTY | A BANKRUPTCY | A OTHER STATUS |
184
+ |--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
185
+ | <input type="checkbox"/> 110 Insurance<br><input type="checkbox"/> 120 Marine<br><input checked="" type="checkbox"/> 130 Act<br><input type="checkbox"/> 140 Negotiable Instrument<br><input type="checkbox"/> 150 Recovery of Overpayment & Enforcement of Judgment<br><input type="checkbox"/> 151 Medicare Act<br><input type="checkbox"/> 152 Recovery of Defaulted Student Learns (Exc. Veterans) B<br><input type="checkbox"/> 153 Recovery of Overpayment of Veteran's Benefits B<br><input type="checkbox"/> 160 Stockholder's Suits<br><input type="checkbox"/> 100 Other Contract<br><input type="checkbox"/> 165 Contract Product Liability | <b>PERSONAL INJURY</b><br><input type="checkbox"/> 310 Airplane<br><input type="checkbox"/> 315 Airplane Product Liability<br><input type="checkbox"/> 320 Assault, Libel & Stander<br><input type="checkbox"/> 330 Federal Employers' Liability<br><input type="checkbox"/> 340 Marine<br><input type="checkbox"/> 345 Marine Product Liability<br><input type="checkbox"/> 350 Motor Vehicle<br><input checked="" type="checkbox"/> 355 Motor Vehicle Product Liability<br><input checked="" type="checkbox"/> 360 Other Personal Injury | <input type="checkbox"/> 610 Agriculture<br><input type="checkbox"/> 620 Other Food & Drug<br><input type="checkbox"/> 625 Drug Related Seizure of Property 21 USC 881<br><input type="checkbox"/> 630 Liquor Laws<br><input type="checkbox"/> 640 R.R. & Truck<br><input type="checkbox"/> 650 Airline Regs<br><input type="checkbox"/> 660 Occupational Safety/Health<br><input type="checkbox"/> 690 Other | <input type="checkbox"/> 422 Appeal 28 USC 156<br><input type="checkbox"/> 423 Withdrawal 28 USC 157 | <input type="checkbox"/> 400 Status Reappointment<br><input type="checkbox"/> 410 Antitrust<br><input type="checkbox"/> 430 Banks and Banking<br><input type="checkbox"/> 450 Commercial/CC Rates/vtc. B<br><input type="checkbox"/> 460 Deportation<br><input type="checkbox"/> 470 Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations<br><input type="checkbox"/> 810 Selective Service<br><input type="checkbox"/> 850 Securities/ Commodities/ Exchange<br><input type="checkbox"/> 675 Customer Challenge 12USC3410<br><input type="checkbox"/> 891 Agricultural Acts<br><input type="checkbox"/> 862 Economic Stabilization Act<br><input type="checkbox"/> 863 Environmental Matters<br><input type="checkbox"/> 894 Energy Allocation Act<br><input type="checkbox"/> 865 Freedom of Information Act<br><input type="checkbox"/> 900 Appeal of Fee Determination Under Equal Access to Justice<br><input type="checkbox"/> 860 Constitutionality of State Statutes<br><input type="checkbox"/> 890 Other Statutory Actions* *A or B<br>Declaratory relief and state law claims for defamation |
186
+ | A REAL PROPERTY | A CIVIL RIGHTS | B PRISONER PETITIONS | A LABOR | |
187
+ | <input type="checkbox"/> 210 Land Condemnation<br><input type="checkbox"/> 220 Foreclosure B<br><input type="checkbox"/> 230 Rent Lease & Ejectment<br><input type="checkbox"/> 240 Torts to Land<br><input type="checkbox"/> 245 Tort Product Liability<br><input type="checkbox"/> 290 All Other Real Property | <input type="checkbox"/> 441 Voting<br><input type="checkbox"/> 442 Employment<br><input type="checkbox"/> 443 Housing/Accommodations<br><input checked="" type="checkbox"/> 244 Welfare<br><input checked="" type="checkbox"/> 440 Other Civil Rights | <input type="checkbox"/> 510 Motions to Vacate Sentence Habeas Corpus<br><input type="checkbox"/> 530 General*<br><input type="checkbox"/> 535 Death Penalty<br><input type="checkbox"/> 540 Mandamus & Other*<br><input type="checkbox"/> 550 Civil Rights *A or B | <input checked="" type="checkbox"/> 710 Fair Labor Standards Act<br><input type="checkbox"/> 720 Labor Management Relations B<br><input type="checkbox"/> 730 Labor Management Reporting & Disclosure Act<br><input type="checkbox"/> 740 Railway Labor Act<br><input type="checkbox"/> 790 Other Labor Litigation<br><input type="checkbox"/> 791 Employee Ret. Inc. Security Act B | |
188
+ | VI. ORIGIN | | | | |
189
+ | x 1. Original | <input type="checkbox"/> 2. Removed from | <input type="checkbox"/> 3. Remanded from | <input type="checkbox"/> 4. Refilled | <input type="checkbox"/> 6. Multidistrict Litigation |
190
+ | | Proceeding | State Court | <input type="checkbox"/> 7. | Appeal to District Judge from |
191
+ | | | Appellate Court (Specify) | <input type="checkbox"/> 5. Transferred from another district | Magistrate Judgment |
192
+
193
+ ![](_page_6_Picture_671.jpeg)
194
+
195
+ **VII. REQUESTED IN COMPLAINT**
196
+
197
+ CHECK IF THIS IS A UNDER F.R.C.P. 23
198
+
199
+ CLASS ACTION
200
+
201
+ DEMAND \$
202
+
203
+ Check YES only if defaulted in LAW. YES complaint: JURY DEMAND: NO
204
+
205
+ **VIII. RELATED CASE(S) IF ANY**
206
+
207
+ (See Instructions): (SEE ATTACHED) JUDGE
208
+
209
+ DOCKET NUMBER
210
+
211
+ *542107*
marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743481/EFTA02743481.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,575 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743481.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 7,
15
+ "chars": 38098,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 24.24,
17
+ "image_assets": [
18
+ "_page_0_Picture_12.jpeg",
19
+ "_page_6_Picture_671.jpeg"
20
+ ],
21
+ "marker_metadata": {
22
+ "table_of_contents": [
23
+ {
24
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
25
+ "heading_level": null,
26
+ "page_id": 0,
27
+ "polygon": [
28
+ [
29
+ 211.56,
30
+ 84.24
31
+ ],
32
+ [
33
+ 411.99920654296875,
34
+ 84.24
35
+ ],
36
+ [
37
+ 411.99920654296875,
38
+ 113.18121337890625
39
+ ],
40
+ [
41
+ 211.56,
42
+ 113.18121337890625
43
+ ]
44
+ ]
45
+ },
46
+ {
47
+ "title": "COMPLAINT",
48
+ "heading_level": null,
49
+ "page_id": 0,
50
+ "polygon": [
51
+ [
52
+ 267.525,
53
+ 341.01
54
+ ],
55
+ [
56
+ 348.70806884765625,
57
+ 341.01
58
+ ],
59
+ [
60
+ 348.70806884765625,
61
+ 354.46038818359375
62
+ ],
63
+ [
64
+ 267.525,
65
+ 354.46038818359375
66
+ ]
67
+ ]
68
+ },
69
+ {
70
+ "title": "Parties, Jurisdiction and Venue",
71
+ "heading_level": null,
72
+ "page_id": 0,
73
+ "polygon": [
74
+ [
75
+ 222.015,
76
+ 454.4100000000001
77
+ ],
78
+ [
79
+ 390.3165283203125,
80
+ 454.4100000000001
81
+ ],
82
+ [
83
+ 390.3165283203125,
84
+ 468.5744323730469
85
+ ],
86
+ [
87
+ 222.015,
88
+ 468.5744323730469
89
+ ]
90
+ ]
91
+ },
92
+ {
93
+ "title": "Factual Allegations",
94
+ "heading_level": null,
95
+ "page_id": 1,
96
+ "polygon": [
97
+ [
98
+ 259.53,
99
+ 311.04
100
+ ],
101
+ [
102
+ 365.8802490234375,
103
+ 311.04
104
+ ],
105
+ [
106
+ 365.8802490234375,
107
+ 327.7330322265625
108
+ ],
109
+ [
110
+ 259.53,
111
+ 327.7330322265625
112
+ ]
113
+ ]
114
+ },
115
+ {
116
+ "title": "COUNT I \nSexual Assault",
117
+ "heading_level": null,
118
+ "page_id": 3,
119
+ "polygon": [
120
+ [
121
+ 266.295,
122
+ 340.2
123
+ ],
124
+ [
125
+ 346.1535339355469,
126
+ 340.2
127
+ ],
128
+ [
129
+ 346.1535339355469,
130
+ 367.74
131
+ ],
132
+ [
133
+ 266.295,
134
+ 367.74
135
+ ]
136
+ ]
137
+ },
138
+ {
139
+ "title": "COUNT H \nIntentional Infliction of Emotional Distress",
140
+ "heading_level": null,
141
+ "page_id": 4,
142
+ "polygon": [
143
+ [
144
+ 198.03000000000003,
145
+ 84.24
146
+ ],
147
+ [
148
+ 423.3843994140625,
149
+ 84.24
150
+ ],
151
+ [
152
+ 423.3843994140625,
153
+ 114.20999999999998
154
+ ],
155
+ [
156
+ 198.03000000000003,
157
+ 114.20999999999998
158
+ ]
159
+ ]
160
+ },
161
+ {
162
+ "title": "COUNT III \nLoss of Parental Consortium",
163
+ "heading_level": null,
164
+ "page_id": 4,
165
+ "polygon": [
166
+ [
167
+ 223.86,
168
+ 581.5799999999999
169
+ ],
170
+ [
171
+ 377.6983642578125,
172
+ 581.5799999999999
173
+ ],
174
+ [
175
+ 377.6983642578125,
176
+ 609.9300000000001
177
+ ],
178
+ [
179
+ 223.86,
180
+ 609.9300000000001
181
+ ]
182
+ ]
183
+ },
184
+ {
185
+ "title": "JURY TRIAL DEMAND",
186
+ "heading_level": null,
187
+ "page_id": 5,
188
+ "polygon": [
189
+ [
190
+ 242.925,
191
+ 226.8
192
+ ],
193
+ [
194
+ 376.38,
195
+ 226.8
196
+ ],
197
+ [
198
+ 376.38,
199
+ 241.38
200
+ ],
201
+ [
202
+ 242.925,
203
+ 241.38
204
+ ]
205
+ ]
206
+ },
207
+ {
208
+ "title": "II. BASIS OF JURISDICTION",
209
+ "heading_level": null,
210
+ "page_id": 6,
211
+ "polygon": [
212
+ [
213
+ 27.06,
214
+ 222.75
215
+ ],
216
+ [
217
+ 135.915,
218
+ 222.75
219
+ ],
220
+ [
221
+ 135.915,
222
+ 233.27999999999997
223
+ ],
224
+ [
225
+ 27.06,
226
+ 233.27999999999997
227
+ ]
228
+ ]
229
+ },
230
+ {
231
+ "title": "III. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES",
232
+ "heading_level": null,
233
+ "page_id": 6,
234
+ "polygon": [
235
+ [
236
+ 256.455,
237
+ 222.75
238
+ ],
239
+ [
240
+ 413.895,
241
+ 222.75
242
+ ],
243
+ [
244
+ 413.895,
245
+ 232.46999999999997
246
+ ],
247
+ [
248
+ 256.455,
249
+ 232.46999999999997
250
+ ]
251
+ ]
252
+ },
253
+ {
254
+ "title": "IV. CAUSE OF ACTION",
255
+ "heading_level": null,
256
+ "page_id": 6,
257
+ "polygon": [
258
+ [
259
+ 27.06,
260
+ 319.95000000000005
261
+ ],
262
+ [
263
+ 118.695,
264
+ 319.95000000000005
265
+ ],
266
+ [
267
+ 118.695,
268
+ 329.66999999999996
269
+ ],
270
+ [
271
+ 27.06,
272
+ 329.66999999999996
273
+ ]
274
+ ]
275
+ }
276
+ ],
277
+ "page_stats": [
278
+ {
279
+ "page_id": 0,
280
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
281
+ "block_counts": [
282
+ [
283
+ "Span",
284
+ 246
285
+ ],
286
+ [
287
+ "Line",
288
+ 34
289
+ ],
290
+ [
291
+ "Text",
292
+ 12
293
+ ],
294
+ [
295
+ "ListItem",
296
+ 4
297
+ ],
298
+ [
299
+ "SectionHeader",
300
+ 3
301
+ ],
302
+ [
303
+ "PageFooter",
304
+ 3
305
+ ],
306
+ [
307
+ "PageHeader",
308
+ 1
309
+ ],
310
+ [
311
+ "Picture",
312
+ 1
313
+ ],
314
+ [
315
+ "ListGroup",
316
+ 1
317
+ ]
318
+ ],
319
+ "block_metadata": {
320
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
321
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
322
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
323
+ "previous_text": "",
324
+ "previous_type": "",
325
+ "previous_order": 0
326
+ }
327
+ },
328
+ {
329
+ "page_id": 1,
330
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
331
+ "block_counts": [
332
+ [
333
+ "Span",
334
+ 52
335
+ ],
336
+ [
337
+ "Line",
338
+ 26
339
+ ],
340
+ [
341
+ "Text",
342
+ 5
343
+ ],
344
+ [
345
+ "PageFooter",
346
+ 4
347
+ ],
348
+ [
349
+ "ListItem",
350
+ 4
351
+ ],
352
+ [
353
+ "PageHeader",
354
+ 1
355
+ ],
356
+ [
357
+ "ListGroup",
358
+ 1
359
+ ],
360
+ [
361
+ "SectionHeader",
362
+ 1
363
+ ]
364
+ ],
365
+ "block_metadata": {
366
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
367
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
368
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
369
+ "previous_text": "",
370
+ "previous_type": "",
371
+ "previous_order": 0
372
+ }
373
+ },
374
+ {
375
+ "page_id": 2,
376
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
377
+ "block_counts": [
378
+ [
379
+ "Span",
380
+ 384
381
+ ],
382
+ [
383
+ "Line",
384
+ 26
385
+ ],
386
+ [
387
+ "PageFooter",
388
+ 4
389
+ ],
390
+ [
391
+ "Text",
392
+ 3
393
+ ],
394
+ [
395
+ "PageHeader",
396
+ 1
397
+ ]
398
+ ],
399
+ "block_metadata": {
400
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
401
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
402
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
403
+ "previous_text": "",
404
+ "previous_type": "",
405
+ "previous_order": 0
406
+ }
407
+ },
408
+ {
409
+ "page_id": 3,
410
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
411
+ "block_counts": [
412
+ [
413
+ "Span",
414
+ 301
415
+ ],
416
+ [
417
+ "Line",
418
+ 26
419
+ ],
420
+ [
421
+ "Text",
422
+ 8
423
+ ],
424
+ [
425
+ "PageFooter",
426
+ 4
427
+ ],
428
+ [
429
+ "PageHeader",
430
+ 1
431
+ ],
432
+ [
433
+ "SectionHeader",
434
+ 1
435
+ ]
436
+ ],
437
+ "block_metadata": {
438
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
439
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
440
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
441
+ "previous_text": "",
442
+ "previous_type": "",
443
+ "previous_order": 0
444
+ }
445
+ },
446
+ {
447
+ "page_id": 4,
448
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
449
+ "block_counts": [
450
+ [
451
+ "Span",
452
+ 283
453
+ ],
454
+ [
455
+ "Line",
456
+ 27
457
+ ],
458
+ [
459
+ "Text",
460
+ 8
461
+ ],
462
+ [
463
+ "PageFooter",
464
+ 4
465
+ ],
466
+ [
467
+ "SectionHeader",
468
+ 2
469
+ ],
470
+ [
471
+ "PageHeader",
472
+ 1
473
+ ]
474
+ ],
475
+ "block_metadata": {
476
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
477
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
478
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
479
+ "previous_text": "",
480
+ "previous_type": "",
481
+ "previous_order": 0
482
+ }
483
+ },
484
+ {
485
+ "page_id": 5,
486
+ "text_extraction_method": "surya",
487
+ "block_counts": [
488
+ [
489
+ "Span",
490
+ 170
491
+ ],
492
+ [
493
+ "Text",
494
+ 33
495
+ ],
496
+ [
497
+ "Line",
498
+ 30
499
+ ],
500
+ [
501
+ "PageFooter",
502
+ 8
503
+ ],
504
+ [
505
+ "PageHeader",
506
+ 2
507
+ ],
508
+ [
509
+ "SectionHeader",
510
+ 2
511
+ ]
512
+ ],
513
+ "block_metadata": {
514
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
515
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
516
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
517
+ "previous_text": "",
518
+ "previous_type": "",
519
+ "previous_order": 0
520
+ }
521
+ },
522
+ {
523
+ "page_id": 6,
524
+ "text_extraction_method": "surya",
525
+ "block_counts": [
526
+ [
527
+ "Span",
528
+ 420
529
+ ],
530
+ [
531
+ "Line",
532
+ 184
533
+ ],
534
+ [
535
+ "Text",
536
+ 65
537
+ ],
538
+ [
539
+ "ListGroup",
540
+ 7
541
+ ],
542
+ [
543
+ "SectionHeader",
544
+ 6
545
+ ],
546
+ [
547
+ "PageHeader",
548
+ 2
549
+ ],
550
+ [
551
+ "Table",
552
+ 2
553
+ ],
554
+ [
555
+ "PageFooter",
556
+ 2
557
+ ],
558
+ [
559
+ "Picture",
560
+ 1
561
+ ]
562
+ ],
563
+ "block_metadata": {
564
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
565
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
566
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
567
+ "previous_text": "",
568
+ "previous_type": "",
569
+ "previous_order": 0
570
+ }
571
+ }
572
+ ],
573
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02743481"
574
+ }
575
+ }
marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743481/_page_0_Picture_12.jpeg ADDED

Git LFS Details

  • SHA256: e5f10322d12d3690a284e19e1c51d2186f20ecd5a1660ac7e2125d7b340e0d30
  • Pointer size: 130 Bytes
  • Size of remote file: 12.4 kB
marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743481/_page_6_Picture_671.jpeg ADDED

Git LFS Details

  • SHA256: 296bddfa5aa2ddc9f82f40d901f45b1941ceb8f09f74c25eebf10b611072c396
  • Pointer size: 130 Bytes
  • Size of remote file: 12 kB
marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743488/EFTA02743488.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ # United States District Court
2
+
3
+ Southern
4
+
5
+ DISTRICT OF Florida
6
+
7
+ ## SUMMONS
8
+
9
+ JANE DOE, by and through
10
+ JANE DOE's FATHER as parent and natural
11
+ guardian, and JANE DOE's FATHER, and
12
+ JANE DOE's STEPMOTHER, individually,
13
+
14
+ Plaintiffs,
15
+
16
+ vs.
17
+
18
+ CASE NO.
19
+
20
+ **CIV-MARRA**
21
+
22
+ **MAGISTRATE JUDGE
23
+ JOHNSON**
24
+
25
+ JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
26
+
27
+ Defendant.
28
+
29
+ **TO: JEFFREY EPSTEIN, individually:**
30
+ **9 East 71st Street**
31
+ **New York, NY 10021**
32
+
33
+ | FILED by | ( ) | D.C. |
34
+ |---------------------------------------------------------------------|-----|------|
35
+ | INTAKE | | |
36
+ | JAN 24 2008 | | |
37
+ | CLARENCE MADDOX<br>CLERK U.S. DIST. CT.<br>S.D. OF FLA. * FT. LAUD. | | |
38
+
39
+ **YOU ARE HEREBY SUMMONED** and required to serve upon PLAINTIFF'S ATTORNEY,
40
+ Jeffrey M. Herman, Esq.
41
+ Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq.
42
+ Herman & Mermelstein, P.A.
43
+ 18205 Biscayne Boulevard, Suite 2218
44
+ Miami, Florida 33160
45
+ (305) 931-2200
46
+
47
+ an answer to the complaint which is herewith served upon you, within 20 days after service of this summons upon you, exclusive of the day of service. If you fail to do so, judgment by default will be taken against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. You must also file your answer with the Clerk of this Court within a reasonable period of time after service.
48
+
49
+ Clarence Maddox
50
+
51
+ JAN 24 2008
52
+
53
+ CLERK
54
+
55
+ DATE
56
+
57
+ ![]()(BY) DEPUTY CLERK
marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743488/EFTA02743488.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743488.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 1,
15
+ "chars": 1520,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 6.39,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "United States District Court",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 142.68,
27
+ 48.599999999999994
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 474.165,
31
+ 48.599999999999994
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 474.165,
35
+ 71.28
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 142.68,
39
+ 71.28
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "SUMMONS",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 266.295,
50
+ 100.44
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 346.85999999999996,
54
+ 100.44
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 346.85999999999996,
58
+ 115.01999999999998
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 266.295,
62
+ 115.01999999999998
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ }
66
+ ],
67
+ "page_stats": [
68
+ {
69
+ "page_id": 0,
70
+ "text_extraction_method": "surya",
71
+ "block_counts": [
72
+ [
73
+ "Span",
74
+ 89
75
+ ],
76
+ [
77
+ "Line",
78
+ 43
79
+ ],
80
+ [
81
+ "Text",
82
+ 42
83
+ ],
84
+ [
85
+ "SectionHeader",
86
+ 4
87
+ ],
88
+ [
89
+ "PageHeader",
90
+ 2
91
+ ],
92
+ [
93
+ "Form",
94
+ 2
95
+ ],
96
+ [
97
+ "PageFooter",
98
+ 2
99
+ ]
100
+ ],
101
+ "block_metadata": {
102
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
103
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
104
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
105
+ "previous_text": "",
106
+ "previous_type": "",
107
+ "previous_order": 0
108
+ }
109
+ }
110
+ ],
111
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02743488"
112
+ }
113
+ }
marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743489/EFTA02743489.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
2
+
3
+ CASE NO.08-80069-CIV-MARRA
4
+
5
+ JANE DOE NO. I by and through JANE DOE'S FATHER as parent and natural guardian, and JANE DOE'S FATHER, and JANE DOE'S STEPMOTHER, individually,
6
+
7
+ Plaintiff, vs.
8
+
9
+ JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
10
+
11
+ Defendant.
12
+
13
+ ## ORDER REQUIRING COUNSEL TO CONFER, FILE JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT AND FILE JOINT DISCOVERY REPORT
14
+
15
+ THIS ORDER has been entered upon the filing of the complaint. Plaintiffs counsel is hereby ORDERED to forward to all defendants, upon receipt of a responsive pleading, a copy of this order.
16
+
17
+ It is further ORDERED:
18
+
19
+ - I. Every motion when filed shall be accompanied by a proposed order, except that motions to dismiss and motions for summary judgment need not be accompanied by a proposed order.
20
+ - 2. Pretrial discovery in this case shall be conducted in accord with Local Rule 16.1 and Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
21
+ - 3. Pursuant to Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, unless this action is excluded under Rule 26(a)(I)(E), the parties must confer within twenty-one (21) days after the filing of the first responsive pleading by the last responding defendant, to consider the nature and basis of their claims and defenses and the possibilities for a prompt settlement or resolution of
22
+
23
+ the case, to make or arrange for the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1), and to develop a proposed discovery plan that indicates the parties' views and proposals concerning the matters listed in Rule 26(0.
24
+
25
+ 4. The parties are jointly responsible for submitting a written report of this conference outlining the proposed discovery plan within 14 days after the conference.
26
+
27
+ 5. Counsel for the parties shall hold a scheduling conference either at the same time as the discovery conference described in Rule 26(1) or within fourteen (14) calendar days thereafter. See Local Rule 16.1(B).
28
+
29
+ 6. Within fourteen (14) days of the scheduling conference, counsel shall file a joint scheduling report pursuant to Local Rule 16.1(B)(2). This report shall indicate the proposed month and year for the trial plus the estimated number of trial days required, as well as an indication of whether the trial is to be a jury trial or bench trial.
30
+
31
+ 7. The parties may submit a single report combining the discovery plan report and the scheduling conference report.
32
+
33
+ 8. Failure of counsel or unrepresented parties to file a discovery plan report or joint scheduling report may result in dismissal, default, and the imposition of other sanctions including attorney's fees and costs.
34
+
35
+ DONE AND SIGNED in at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida, this 28ih day of January, 2008.
36
+
37
+ > KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge
38
+
39
+ Copies furnished to: All counsel
marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743489/EFTA02743489.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,151 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743489.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 2,
15
+ "chars": 2748,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 0.72,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 206.856,
27
+ 57.50999999999999
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 405.5581359863281,
31
+ 57.50999999999999
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 405.5581359863281,
35
+ 86.9830322265625
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 206.856,
39
+ 86.9830322265625
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "ORDER REQUIRING COUNSEL TO CONFER, FILE JOINT SCHEDULING REPORT \nAND FILE JOINT DISCOVERY REPORT",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 72.216,
50
+ 312.65999999999997
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 540.4690551757812,
54
+ 312.65999999999997
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 540.4690551757812,
58
+ 341.9830322265625
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 72.216,
62
+ 341.9830322265625
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ }
66
+ ],
67
+ "page_stats": [
68
+ {
69
+ "page_id": 0,
70
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
71
+ "block_counts": [
72
+ [
73
+ "Span",
74
+ 55
75
+ ],
76
+ [
77
+ "Line",
78
+ 28
79
+ ],
80
+ [
81
+ "Text",
82
+ 7
83
+ ],
84
+ [
85
+ "ListItem",
86
+ 3
87
+ ],
88
+ [
89
+ "SectionHeader",
90
+ 2
91
+ ],
92
+ [
93
+ "PageHeader",
94
+ 1
95
+ ],
96
+ [
97
+ "ListGroup",
98
+ 1
99
+ ],
100
+ [
101
+ "PageFooter",
102
+ 1
103
+ ]
104
+ ],
105
+ "block_metadata": {
106
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
107
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
108
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
109
+ "previous_text": "",
110
+ "previous_type": "",
111
+ "previous_order": 0
112
+ }
113
+ },
114
+ {
115
+ "page_id": 1,
116
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
117
+ "block_counts": [
118
+ [
119
+ "Span",
120
+ 53
121
+ ],
122
+ [
123
+ "Line",
124
+ 26
125
+ ],
126
+ [
127
+ "Text",
128
+ 9
129
+ ],
130
+ [
131
+ "PageFooter",
132
+ 2
133
+ ],
134
+ [
135
+ "PageHeader",
136
+ 1
137
+ ]
138
+ ],
139
+ "block_metadata": {
140
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
141
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
142
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
143
+ "previous_text": "",
144
+ "previous_type": "",
145
+ "previous_order": 0
146
+ }
147
+ }
148
+ ],
149
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02743489"
150
+ }
151
+ }
marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743491/EFTA02743491.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ## EXHIBIT A
2
+
3
+ ## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
4
+
5
+ CASE NO.: 08-80069 CIV-MARRA/Mil
6
+
7
+ JANE DOE NO.1, by and through JANE DOE's FATHER as parent and natural guardian, and JANE DOE's FATHER, and JANE DOE's STEPMOTHER, individually,
8
+
9
+ Plaintiffs,
10
+
11
+ vs.
12
+
13
+ JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
14
+
15
+ Defendant.
16
+
17
+ ## AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS
18
+
19
+ being duly sworn deposes and says that:
20
+
21
+ - 1. I am the mother and natural guardian for Jane Doe No.1 as referenced in the Complaint filed on January 24, 2008, in the United States District Court Southern District of Florida, Case No. 08-80069 UV-MARRA-EMI This Affidavit is filed in support of the Motion to Stay Proceedings.
22
+ - 2. Jane Doe No. 1 will be eighteen (18) years of age on May 13, 2008.
23
+ - 3. Jane Doe No.1 has been estranged from her father since Thanksgiving day, November 22, 2007.
24
+ - 4. On January 24, 2008, Jane Doe No.1's father filed alawsuit on behalf of himself and as parent and natural guardian of Jane Doe No. 1 against Jeffrey Epstein in the United States District Cowt, Southern District of Florida, Case No. 08-80069 CIV-MARRAMMI. Jane Doe's
25
+
26
+ ![](_page_1_Picture_11.jpeg)
27
+
28
+ father filed this lawsuit against Defendant Jeffrey Epstein without the knowledge, consultation or consent of me or of my daughter, Jane Doe No. 1 .
29
+
30
+ 5. Jane Doe No.1 does not want her lawsuit to be prosecuted on her behalf by her father.
31
+
32
+ FURTHER, AFFIANT SAYETH NOT.
33
+
34
+ as mother and natural guardian of Jane Doe No. I
35
+
36
+ STATE OF GEORGIA
37
+
38
+ COUNTY OF WALESKA
39
+
40
+ The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this c-1:Oday of iCkywaft 2008 by who is personally known to me or has produced RN Dr.\ vors L2 ca- < as identification and who (did/did not) take an oath.
41
+
42
+ ss:
43
+
44
+ Otit ed-) 0 CUJIVA Notary Pub ' Commission No.:
45
+
46
+ ![](_page_2_Picture_11.jpeg)
marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743491/EFTA02743491.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,219 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743491.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 3,
15
+ "chars": 1805,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 0.83,
17
+ "image_assets": [
18
+ "_page_1_Picture_11.jpeg",
19
+ "_page_2_Picture_11.jpeg"
20
+ ],
21
+ "marker_metadata": {
22
+ "table_of_contents": [
23
+ {
24
+ "title": "EXHIBIT A",
25
+ "heading_level": null,
26
+ "page_id": 0,
27
+ "polygon": [
28
+ [
29
+ 177.48,
30
+ 285.92999999999995
31
+ ],
32
+ [
33
+ 433.50836181640625,
34
+ 285.92999999999995
35
+ ],
36
+ [
37
+ 433.50836181640625,
38
+ 336.6527404785156
39
+ ],
40
+ [
41
+ 177.48,
42
+ 336.6527404785156
43
+ ]
44
+ ]
45
+ },
46
+ {
47
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
48
+ "heading_level": null,
49
+ "page_id": 1,
50
+ "polygon": [
51
+ [
52
+ 199.512,
53
+ 68.85000000000001
54
+ ],
55
+ [
56
+ 414.2095947265625,
57
+ 68.85000000000001
58
+ ],
59
+ [
60
+ 414.2095947265625,
61
+ 97.07232666015625
62
+ ],
63
+ [
64
+ 199.512,
65
+ 97.07232666015625
66
+ ]
67
+ ]
68
+ },
69
+ {
70
+ "title": "AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS",
71
+ "heading_level": null,
72
+ "page_id": 1,
73
+ "polygon": [
74
+ [
75
+ 122.4,
76
+ 343.43999999999994
77
+ ],
78
+ [
79
+ 484.94854736328125,
80
+ 343.43999999999994
81
+ ],
82
+ [
83
+ 484.94854736328125,
84
+ 360.4220275878906
85
+ ],
86
+ [
87
+ 122.4,
88
+ 360.4220275878906
89
+ ]
90
+ ]
91
+ }
92
+ ],
93
+ "page_stats": [
94
+ {
95
+ "page_id": 0,
96
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
97
+ "block_counts": [
98
+ [
99
+ "Span",
100
+ 5
101
+ ],
102
+ [
103
+ "Line",
104
+ 3
105
+ ],
106
+ [
107
+ "PageHeader",
108
+ 1
109
+ ],
110
+ [
111
+ "SectionHeader",
112
+ 1
113
+ ],
114
+ [
115
+ "PageFooter",
116
+ 1
117
+ ]
118
+ ],
119
+ "block_metadata": {
120
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
121
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
122
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
123
+ "previous_text": "",
124
+ "previous_type": "",
125
+ "previous_order": 0
126
+ }
127
+ },
128
+ {
129
+ "page_id": 1,
130
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
131
+ "block_counts": [
132
+ [
133
+ "Span",
134
+ 221
135
+ ],
136
+ [
137
+ "Line",
138
+ 25
139
+ ],
140
+ [
141
+ "Text",
142
+ 7
143
+ ],
144
+ [
145
+ "ListItem",
146
+ 4
147
+ ],
148
+ [
149
+ "SectionHeader",
150
+ 2
151
+ ],
152
+ [
153
+ "PageHeader",
154
+ 1
155
+ ],
156
+ [
157
+ "ListGroup",
158
+ 1
159
+ ],
160
+ [
161
+ "Picture",
162
+ 1
163
+ ],
164
+ [
165
+ "PageFooter",
166
+ 1
167
+ ]
168
+ ],
169
+ "block_metadata": {
170
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
171
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
172
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
173
+ "previous_text": "",
174
+ "previous_type": "",
175
+ "previous_order": 0
176
+ }
177
+ },
178
+ {
179
+ "page_id": 2,
180
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
181
+ "block_counts": [
182
+ [
183
+ "Span",
184
+ 42
185
+ ],
186
+ [
187
+ "Line",
188
+ 19
189
+ ],
190
+ [
191
+ "Text",
192
+ 10
193
+ ],
194
+ [
195
+ "PageFooter",
196
+ 2
197
+ ],
198
+ [
199
+ "PageHeader",
200
+ 1
201
+ ],
202
+ [
203
+ "Picture",
204
+ 1
205
+ ]
206
+ ],
207
+ "block_metadata": {
208
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
209
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
210
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
211
+ "previous_text": "",
212
+ "previous_type": "",
213
+ "previous_order": 0
214
+ }
215
+ }
216
+ ],
217
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02743491"
218
+ }
219
+ }
marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743491/_page_1_Picture_11.jpeg ADDED

Git LFS Details

  • SHA256: 34a6be10b9fac651bd75651fa736dfdefbd31f50a0e01f6834036bff615c6774
  • Pointer size: 130 Bytes
  • Size of remote file: 10.9 kB
marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743491/_page_2_Picture_11.jpeg ADDED

Git LFS Details

  • SHA256: aa274cb4e9419820505b1026279ba39569886adcb0728041290c75bbac2556df
  • Pointer size: 130 Bytes
  • Size of remote file: 17.6 kB
marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743494/EFTA02743494.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
2
+
3
+ CASE NO.: 08-80069 CIV-MARRA/ I
4
+
5
+ JANE DOE NO.1, by and through JANE DOE's FATHER as parent and natural guardian, and JANE DOE's FATHER, and JANE DOE's STEPMOTHER, individually,
6
+
7
+ Plaintiffs,
8
+
9
+ JANE DOE'S MOTHER, individually and as parent and natural guardian of JANE DOE NO. 1,
10
+
11
+ Intervenor-Plaintiff,
12
+
13
+ vs.
14
+
15
+ JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
16
+
17
+ Defendant.
18
+
19
+ ## MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING JANE DOE NO. 1 REACHING AGE OF MAJORITY
20
+
21
+ JANE DOE'S MOTHER, individually and as parent and natural guardian of JANE DOE NO. 1, by and through the undersigned counsel, moves the Court to stay these proceedings pending JANE DOE NO. 1 reaching the age of majority, and as grounds for said motion states as follows:
22
+
23
+ - 1. JANE DOE NO. 1 is a minor child, 17 years of age, who is under the joint control of her parents and natural guardians, JANE DOE'S FATHER and JANE DOE'S MOTHER, who are divorced.
24
+ - 2. JANE DOE NO. 1 will be 18 on May 13, 2008. See affidavit of JANE DOE'S MOTHER (attached hereto as EXHIBIT "A").
25
+ - 3. JANE DOE NO. 1 has been estranged from JANE DOE'S FATHER since Thanksgiving Day, November 22, 2007. See Exhibit "A" (Affidavit of JANE DOE'S MOTHER).
26
+
27
+ 4. JANE DOE'S FATHER filed this lawsuit against Defendant Jeffrey Epstein without the knowledge, consultation or consent of JANE DOE NO. 1. See Exhibit "A" (Affidavit of JANE DOE'S MOTHER).
28
+
29
+ 5. JANE DOE NO. 1 does not want this lawsuit to be prosecuted on her behalf by JANE DOE'S FATHER. See Exhibit "A" (Affidavit of JANE DOE'S MOTHER).
30
+
31
+ 6. Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1.A.3, counsel for Intervenor-Plaintiff JANE DOE'S MOTHER, in a good faith attempt to resolve this dispute, made a reasonable effort to confer with all parties who may be affected by this motion to stay. Counsel for Intervenor-Plaintiff JANE DOE'S MOTHER conferred with Counsel for JANE DOE'S FATHER, who do not agree to the Court entering a stay in this action.
32
+
33
+ WHEREFORE, Intervenor-Plaintiff, JANE DOE'S MOTHER, moves the Court to stay these proceedings pending JANE DOE NO. I reaching the age of majority at which time she can decide whether, and how, to continue prosecution of this action.
34
+
35
+ I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was filed electronically on January 20, 2008 with the Clerk of the Court through ECF, and that ECF will send an e-notice of the electronic filing to the following: Jeffrey M. Herman, jherman@hermanlaw.com; Stuart S. Mermelstein, smermelstein@hermanlaw.com; Adam D. Horowitz, ahorowitz@hennanlaw.com.
36
+
37
+ Respectfully submitted,
38
+
39
+ /s/Theodore J. Leopold. Esq.
40
+
41
+ THEODORE J. LEOPOLD, ESQ.
42
+
43
+ Florida Bar No. 705608
44
+
45
+ RICCI-LEOPOLD, P.A.
46
+
47
+ 2925 PGA Boulevard, Suite 200
48
+
49
+ Palm Beach Gardens FL 33410
50
+
51
+ Phone: 561-684-6500;
52
+
53
+ Fax: 561-515-2610
54
+
55
+ Email: tleopold@riccilaw.com
marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743494/EFTA02743494.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,151 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743494.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 2,
15
+ "chars": 2791,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 0.88,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 196.452,
27
+ 57.50999999999999
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 408.3864440917969,
31
+ 57.50999999999999
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 408.3864440917969,
35
+ 86.613037109375
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 196.452,
39
+ 86.613037109375
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING JANE \nDOE NO. 1 REACHING AGE OF MAJORITY",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 153.0,
50
+ 387.98999999999995
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 448.8995056152344,
54
+ 387.98999999999995
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 448.8995056152344,
58
+ 417.35302734375
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 153.0,
62
+ 417.35302734375
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ }
66
+ ],
67
+ "page_stats": [
68
+ {
69
+ "page_id": 0,
70
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
71
+ "block_counts": [
72
+ [
73
+ "Span",
74
+ 60
75
+ ],
76
+ [
77
+ "Line",
78
+ 29
79
+ ],
80
+ [
81
+ "Text",
82
+ 9
83
+ ],
84
+ [
85
+ "ListItem",
86
+ 3
87
+ ],
88
+ [
89
+ "SectionHeader",
90
+ 2
91
+ ],
92
+ [
93
+ "PageHeader",
94
+ 1
95
+ ],
96
+ [
97
+ "ListGroup",
98
+ 1
99
+ ],
100
+ [
101
+ "PageFooter",
102
+ 1
103
+ ]
104
+ ],
105
+ "block_metadata": {
106
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
107
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
108
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
109
+ "previous_text": "",
110
+ "previous_type": "",
111
+ "previous_order": 0
112
+ }
113
+ },
114
+ {
115
+ "page_id": 1,
116
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
117
+ "block_counts": [
118
+ [
119
+ "Span",
120
+ 65
121
+ ],
122
+ [
123
+ "Line",
124
+ 31
125
+ ],
126
+ [
127
+ "Text",
128
+ 15
129
+ ],
130
+ [
131
+ "PageFooter",
132
+ 2
133
+ ],
134
+ [
135
+ "PageHeader",
136
+ 1
137
+ ]
138
+ ],
139
+ "block_metadata": {
140
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
141
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
142
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
143
+ "previous_text": "",
144
+ "previous_type": "",
145
+ "previous_order": 0
146
+ }
147
+ }
148
+ ],
149
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02743494"
150
+ }
151
+ }
marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743496/EFTA02743496.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ # EXHIBIT A
2
+
3
+ ## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
4
+
5
+ CASE NO. 08-80069 CIV-MARRS
6
+
7
+ JANE DOE NO.1, by and through JANE DOE's FATHER as parent and natural guardian, and JANE DOE's FATHER, and JANE DOE's STEPMOTHER, individually,
8
+
9
+ Plaintiffs,
10
+
11
+ JANE DOE'S MOTHER, individually and as parent and natural guardian of JANE DOE NO. 1,
12
+
13
+ Intervenor-Plaintiff,
14
+
15
+ vs.
16
+
17
+ JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
18
+
19
+ Defendant.
20
+
21
+ ## INTERVENOR'S COMPLAINT
22
+
23
+ Intervenor-Plaintiff, JANE DOE's MOTHER, individually and as parent and natural guardian of JANE DOE NO. 1, by and through the undersigned counsel, brings this Complaint against Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN, and as grounds states as follows:
24
+
25
+ ## Parties, Jurisdiction and Venue
26
+
27
+ - I. Jane Doe No. 1 is a citizen and resident of the State of Florida. She is a minor under the age of 18 years.
28
+ - 2. Jane Doe's Mother brings this action individually and as parent and natural guardian of Jane Doe No. 1. Jane Doe's Mother is a citizen and resident of the State of Georgia.
29
+
30
+ - 3. This Complaint is brought under fictitious names to protect the identity of the Minor Plaintiff because this Complaint makes sensitive allegations of sexual assault and abuse upon a minor.
31
+ - 4. Defendant Jeffrey Epstein is a citizen and resident of the State of New York.
32
+ - 5. This is an action for damages in excess of Fifty Million (\$50,000,000.00) Dollars.
33
+
34
+ ## Factual Allegations
35
+
36
+ - 6. At all relevant times, Defendant Jeffrey Epstein ("Epstein") was an adult male, 52 years old. Epstein is a financier and money manager with a secret clientele limited exclusively to billionaires. He is himself a man of tremendous wealth, power and influence. He maintains his principal home in New York and also owns residences in New Mexico, St. =and Palm Beach, FL. The allegations herein concern Epstein's conduct while at his lavish estate in Palm Beach.
37
+ - 7. Upon information and belief, Epstein has a sexual preference and obsession for underage minor girls. He engaged in a plan and scheme in which he gained access to primarily economically disadvantaged minor girls in his home, sexually assaulted these girls, and then gave them money. In or about 2005, Jane Doe, then 14 years old, fell into Epstein's trap and became one of his victims.
38
+ - 8. Upon information and belief, Jeffrey Epstein carried out his scheme and assaulted girls in Florida, New York and on his private island, known as Little St. James, in St. M.
39
+ - 9. An integral player in Epstein's Florida scheme was a Palm Beach Community College student from Loxahatchee, Florida. She recruited girls ostensibly to give a wealthy man a massage for monetary compensation in his Palm Beach mansion. Under Epstein's plan, would be contacted when Epstein was planning to be at his Palm Beach residence or soon after he had arrived there. Epstein or someone on his behalf directed Ms.
40
+
41
+ to bring one or more underage girls to the residence. SIMI, upon information and belief, generally sought out economically disadvantaged underage girls from Loxahatchee and surrounding areas who would be enticed by the money being offered generally \$200 to \$300 per "massage" session — and who were perceived as less likely to complain to authorities or have credibility if allegations of improper conduct were made. This was an important element of Epstein's plan.
42
+
43
+ - 10. Epstein's plan and scheme reflected a particular pattern and method. Upon arrival at Epstein's mansion, Mr. would introduce each victim to Epstein's assistant, who gathered the girl's personal information, including her name and telephone number. ■ would then bring the girl up a flight of stairs to a bedroom that contained a massage table in addition to other furnishings. There were photographs of nude women lining the stairway ■ **and in the bedroom. would then leave the girl alone in this room, whereupon Epstein would enter wearing only a towel. He would then remove his towel, lay down naked on the massage table, and direct the girl to remove her clothes. He then would perform one or more lewd, lascivious and sexual acts, including masturbation and touching the girl's vagina with a vibrator.**
44
+ - **11. Consistent with the foregoing plan and scheme, recruited Jane Doe to give Epstein a massage for monetary compensation. brought Jane to Epstein's mansion in Palm Beach. Jane was introduced to who led her up the flight of stairs to the room with the massage table. She was alone in the room when Epstein arrived wearing only a towel. He removed his towel, and laid down naked on the massage table. He demanded that Jane remove her clothes. In shock, fear and trepidation, Jane complied, removing her clothes except for her underwear. Epstein then sexually assaulted Jane.**
45
+
46
+ - 12. After Epstein had completed the assault, he left the room. Jane was then able to get dressed, leave the room and go back down the stairs. She then met again who brought Jane home. Jane was paid \$300 by Epstein. Epstein for bringing Jane to him.
47
+ - 13. As a result of this encounter with Epstein, the 14-year old Jane experienced confusion, shame, humiliation, embarrassment and the assault sent her life into adownward spiral. was paid \$200 by
48
+
49
+ ## COUNT I Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress
50
+
51
+ - 14. Intervenor-Plaintiff JANE DOE's MOTHER repeats and realleges paragraphs 1 through 13 above. IS. Epstein's conduct was intentional or reckless.
52
+ - 16. Epstein's conduct was outrageous, going beyond all bounds of decency.
53
+ - 17. Epstein's conduct caused severe emotional distress not only to Jane Doe, but also to her parents, including Jane Doe's Mother. Epstein knew or had reason to know that his intentional and outrageous conduct would cause emotional trauma and damage to Jane Doe's parents.
54
+ - 18. As a direct and proximate result of Epstein's intentional or reckless conduct, Jane Doe's Mother has suffered and will continue to suffer severe mental anguish and pain.
55
+
56
+ WHEREFORE, Intervenor-Plaintiff Jane Doe's Mother demands judgment against Defendant Jeffrey Epstein for compensatory damages, costs, punitive damages, and such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper.
57
+
58
+ ## COUNT H Loss of Parental Consortium
59
+
60
+ 19. Plaintiff Jane Doe's Mother repeats and realleges paragraphs 1 through 13 above.
61
+
62
+ 20. Epstein's tortious conduct is the direct and proximate cause of damages to Jane Doe's Mother, consisting of parental loss of comfort, companionship and society and healthcare costs associated with the treatment of Jane.
63
+
64
+ 21. Jane Doe's Mother experienced and will continue to experience great mental anguish, pain and suffering from the time that Defendant's tortious conduct occurred.
65
+
66
+ WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Jane Doe's Mother demands judgment for loss of consortium, damages, costs and such other and further relief as this Court deems proper.
67
+
68
+ #### JURY TRIAL DEMAND
69
+
70
+ Intervenor-Plaintiff demands a jury trial in this action.
71
+
72
+ Dated: January , 2008 Respectfully submitted,
73
+
74
+ RICCI—LEOPOLD, P.A. 2925 PGA Blvd. : ''te 200 Palm Beach G FL Phone: 561-6 • 56 I -6
75
+
76
+ Fl POLD, Esq. 608
77
+
78
+ I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the oregoing Intervenor's Complaint was filed electronically on 2008 with the Clerk of the Court through ECF, and that ECF will send an e-notice of the electronic filing to the following: Jeffrey M.
79
+
80
+ Herman, ihermanAhermanlaw.com; Stuart S. Mermelstein, smermel
81
+
82
+ Adam D. Horowitz, ahorowitzelennanl aw.com.
83
+
84
+ RICCI-2925 P Palm B Phone: 33410
85
+
86
+ By: POLD, Esq. lorida Bar No 5608
marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743496/EFTA02743496.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,491 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743496.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 7,
15
+ "chars": 7454,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 1.08,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "EXHIBIT A",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 176.868,
27
+ 286.74
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 432.98773193359375,
31
+ 286.74
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 432.98773193359375,
35
+ 338.2821960449219
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 176.868,
39
+ 338.2821960449219
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 1,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 203.09999084472656,
50
+ 76.091552734375
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 414.324,
54
+ 76.091552734375
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 414.324,
58
+ 103.4730224609375
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 203.09999084472656,
62
+ 103.4730224609375
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ },
66
+ {
67
+ "title": "INTERVENOR'S COMPLAINT",
68
+ "heading_level": null,
69
+ "page_id": 1,
70
+ "polygon": [
71
+ [
72
+ 217.87199999999999,
73
+ 447.12000000000006
74
+ ],
75
+ [
76
+ 391.68,
77
+ 447.12000000000006
78
+ ],
79
+ [
80
+ 391.68,
81
+ 461.2130126953125
82
+ ],
83
+ [
84
+ 217.87199999999999,
85
+ 461.2130126953125
86
+ ]
87
+ ]
88
+ },
89
+ {
90
+ "title": "Parties, Jurisdiction and Venue",
91
+ "heading_level": null,
92
+ "page_id": 1,
93
+ "polygon": [
94
+ [
95
+ 223.99200000000002,
96
+ 557.28
97
+ ],
98
+ [
99
+ 383.724,
100
+ 557.28
101
+ ],
102
+ [
103
+ 383.724,
104
+ 571.093017578125
105
+ ],
106
+ [
107
+ 223.99200000000002,
108
+ 571.093017578125
109
+ ]
110
+ ]
111
+ },
112
+ {
113
+ "title": "Factual Allegations",
114
+ "heading_level": null,
115
+ "page_id": 2,
116
+ "polygon": [
117
+ [
118
+ 258.6100158691406,
119
+ 198.45000000000002
120
+ ],
121
+ [
122
+ 358.02,
123
+ 198.45000000000002
124
+ ],
125
+ [
126
+ 358.02,
127
+ 212.843505859375
128
+ ],
129
+ [
130
+ 258.6100158691406,
131
+ 212.843505859375
132
+ ]
133
+ ]
134
+ },
135
+ {
136
+ "title": "COUNT I \nIntentional Infliction of Emotional Distress",
137
+ "heading_level": null,
138
+ "page_id": 4,
139
+ "polygon": [
140
+ [
141
+ 195.228,
142
+ 230.03999999999996
143
+ ],
144
+ [
145
+ 421.5924987792969,
146
+ 230.03999999999996
147
+ ],
148
+ [
149
+ 421.5924987792969,
150
+ 257.58
151
+ ],
152
+ [
153
+ 195.228,
154
+ 257.58
155
+ ]
156
+ ]
157
+ },
158
+ {
159
+ "title": "COUNT H \nLoss of Parental Consortium",
160
+ "heading_level": null,
161
+ "page_id": 5,
162
+ "polygon": [
163
+ [
164
+ 233.86000061035156,
165
+ 63.17999999999999
166
+ ],
167
+ [
168
+ 385.56000000000006,
169
+ 63.17999999999999
170
+ ],
171
+ [
172
+ 385.56000000000006,
173
+ 90.7130126953125
174
+ ],
175
+ [
176
+ 233.86000061035156,
177
+ 90.7130126953125
178
+ ]
179
+ ]
180
+ },
181
+ {
182
+ "title": "JURY TRIAL DEMAND",
183
+ "heading_level": null,
184
+ "page_id": 5,
185
+ "polygon": [
186
+ [
187
+ 240.25999450683594,
188
+ 338.58
189
+ ],
190
+ [
191
+ 373.61456298828125,
192
+ 338.58
193
+ ],
194
+ [
195
+ 373.61456298828125,
196
+ 352.093017578125
197
+ ],
198
+ [
199
+ 240.25999450683594,
200
+ 352.093017578125
201
+ ]
202
+ ]
203
+ }
204
+ ],
205
+ "page_stats": [
206
+ {
207
+ "page_id": 0,
208
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
209
+ "block_counts": [
210
+ [
211
+ "Span",
212
+ 5
213
+ ],
214
+ [
215
+ "Line",
216
+ 3
217
+ ],
218
+ [
219
+ "PageHeader",
220
+ 1
221
+ ],
222
+ [
223
+ "SectionHeader",
224
+ 1
225
+ ],
226
+ [
227
+ "PageFooter",
228
+ 1
229
+ ]
230
+ ],
231
+ "block_metadata": {
232
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
233
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
234
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
235
+ "previous_text": "",
236
+ "previous_type": "",
237
+ "previous_order": 0
238
+ }
239
+ },
240
+ {
241
+ "page_id": 1,
242
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
243
+ "block_counts": [
244
+ [
245
+ "Span",
246
+ 49
247
+ ],
248
+ [
249
+ "Line",
250
+ 25
251
+ ],
252
+ [
253
+ "Text",
254
+ 10
255
+ ],
256
+ [
257
+ "SectionHeader",
258
+ 3
259
+ ],
260
+ [
261
+ "ListItem",
262
+ 2
263
+ ],
264
+ [
265
+ "PageHeader",
266
+ 1
267
+ ],
268
+ [
269
+ "ListGroup",
270
+ 1
271
+ ],
272
+ [
273
+ "PageFooter",
274
+ 1
275
+ ]
276
+ ],
277
+ "block_metadata": {
278
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
279
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
280
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
281
+ "previous_text": "",
282
+ "previous_type": "",
283
+ "previous_order": 0
284
+ }
285
+ },
286
+ {
287
+ "page_id": 2,
288
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
289
+ "block_counts": [
290
+ [
291
+ "Span",
292
+ 53
293
+ ],
294
+ [
295
+ "Line",
296
+ 27
297
+ ],
298
+ [
299
+ "ListItem",
300
+ 7
301
+ ],
302
+ [
303
+ "ListGroup",
304
+ 2
305
+ ],
306
+ [
307
+ "PageFooter",
308
+ 2
309
+ ],
310
+ [
311
+ "PageHeader",
312
+ 1
313
+ ],
314
+ [
315
+ "SectionHeader",
316
+ 1
317
+ ]
318
+ ],
319
+ "block_metadata": {
320
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
321
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
322
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
323
+ "previous_text": "",
324
+ "previous_type": "",
325
+ "previous_order": 0
326
+ }
327
+ },
328
+ {
329
+ "page_id": 3,
330
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
331
+ "block_counts": [
332
+ [
333
+ "Span",
334
+ 56
335
+ ],
336
+ [
337
+ "Line",
338
+ 27
339
+ ],
340
+ [
341
+ "PageFooter",
342
+ 2
343
+ ],
344
+ [
345
+ "ListItem",
346
+ 2
347
+ ],
348
+ [
349
+ "PageHeader",
350
+ 1
351
+ ],
352
+ [
353
+ "Text",
354
+ 1
355
+ ],
356
+ [
357
+ "ListGroup",
358
+ 1
359
+ ]
360
+ ],
361
+ "block_metadata": {
362
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
363
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
364
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
365
+ "previous_text": "",
366
+ "previous_type": "",
367
+ "previous_order": 0
368
+ }
369
+ },
370
+ {
371
+ "page_id": 4,
372
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
373
+ "block_counts": [
374
+ [
375
+ "Span",
376
+ 272
377
+ ],
378
+ [
379
+ "Line",
380
+ 25
381
+ ],
382
+ [
383
+ "ListItem",
384
+ 6
385
+ ],
386
+ [
387
+ "ListGroup",
388
+ 2
389
+ ],
390
+ [
391
+ "PageFooter",
392
+ 2
393
+ ],
394
+ [
395
+ "PageHeader",
396
+ 1
397
+ ],
398
+ [
399
+ "SectionHeader",
400
+ 1
401
+ ],
402
+ [
403
+ "Text",
404
+ 1
405
+ ]
406
+ ],
407
+ "block_metadata": {
408
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
409
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
410
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
411
+ "previous_text": "",
412
+ "previous_type": "",
413
+ "previous_order": 0
414
+ }
415
+ },
416
+ {
417
+ "page_id": 5,
418
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
419
+ "block_counts": [
420
+ [
421
+ "Span",
422
+ 55
423
+ ],
424
+ [
425
+ "Line",
426
+ 27
427
+ ],
428
+ [
429
+ "Text",
430
+ 10
431
+ ],
432
+ [
433
+ "SectionHeader",
434
+ 2
435
+ ],
436
+ [
437
+ "PageFooter",
438
+ 2
439
+ ],
440
+ [
441
+ "PageHeader",
442
+ 1
443
+ ]
444
+ ],
445
+ "block_metadata": {
446
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
447
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
448
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
449
+ "previous_text": "",
450
+ "previous_type": "",
451
+ "previous_order": 0
452
+ }
453
+ },
454
+ {
455
+ "page_id": 6,
456
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
457
+ "block_counts": [
458
+ [
459
+ "Span",
460
+ 26
461
+ ],
462
+ [
463
+ "Line",
464
+ 13
465
+ ],
466
+ [
467
+ "Text",
468
+ 4
469
+ ],
470
+ [
471
+ "PageFooter",
472
+ 2
473
+ ],
474
+ [
475
+ "PageHeader",
476
+ 1
477
+ ]
478
+ ],
479
+ "block_metadata": {
480
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
481
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
482
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
483
+ "previous_text": "",
484
+ "previous_type": "",
485
+ "previous_order": 0
486
+ }
487
+ }
488
+ ],
489
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02743496"
490
+ }
491
+ }
marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743503/EFTA02743503.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
2
+
3
+ CASE NO.: 08-80069 CIV-MARla
4
+
5
+ JANE DOE NO.1, by and through JANE DOE's FATHER as parent and natural guardian, and JANE DOE's FATHER, and JANE DOE's STEPMOTHER, individually,
6
+
7
+ Plaintiffs,
8
+
9
+ vs.
10
+
11
+ JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
12
+
13
+ Defendant.
14
+
15
+ ## MOTION TO INTERVENE AND SUPPORTING MEMORANDUM OF LAW
16
+
17
+ Applicant, JANE DOE'S MOTHER, individually and as parent and natural guardian of JANE DOE NO. 1, by and through the undersigned counsel, moves this Court, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(b), for leave to intervene as a plaintiff in this action in order to assert the claims against Defendant JEFFREY EPSTEIN set forth in Applicant's proposed complaint (attached hereto as EXHIBIT "A'9. In support of this motion, Applicant states that:
18
+
19
+ - 1. Applicant has claims that share common questions of law or fact with the main action.
20
+ - 2. Applicant's motion to intervene is timely.
21
+ - 3. The original parties to this action will not be prejudiced by the intervention of Applicant.
22
+ - 4. Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1.A.3, counsel for Applicant, in a good faith attempt to resolve this dispute, made a reasonable effort to confer with all parties who may be affected by
23
+
24
+ her intervention in this action. Counsel for Applicant conferred with Counsel for JANE DOE'S FATHER, who do not agree to her intervention in this action.
25
+
26
+ ## MEMORANDUM OF LAW
27
+
28
+ Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(b)(l)(B), "[o]n timely motion, the court may permit anyone to intervene who . . . has a claim or defense that shares with the main action a common question of law or fact." "Rule 24(b) should be liberally construed. `Basically, anyone may be permitted to intervene if his claim and the main action have a common question of law or fact,' unless the court in its `sound discretion (determines that) the intervention will unduly delay or prejudice the adjudication of the rights of the original parties.'" Moore v. Tangipahoa Parish School Bd., 298 F. Supp. 288, 292-93 (D.C. La. 1969) (quoting v. County School Board of Prince Edward County, 28 F.R.D. 358, 363 (E.D. Va. 1961)) (citation and footnote omitted).
29
+
30
+ Applicant, JANE DOE'S MOTHER, is the parent and natural guardian of JANE DOE NO. 1. As demonstrated in the attached proposed complaint, Applicant has claims for the same causes of action as JANE DOE'S FATHER. Therefore, her claims share common questions of law and fact with the main action. Applicant's motion to intervene is timely because it has been filed within days of the filing of the initial complaint in this action. And, because this action has just been initiated, permitting Applicant to intervene at this stage will not unduly delay the proceedings or prejudice the original parties.
31
+
32
+ WHEREFORE, Applicant, JANE DOE's MOTHER, respectfully requests the Court grant her motion to intervene and accept the attached proposed Intervenor's Complaint as filed.
33
+
34
+ Dated: January 29th, 2008
35
+
36
+ Respectfully submitted,
37
+
38
+ RICCI—LEOPOLD, P.A. 2925 PGA Blvd., Suite 200 Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 Phone: 561-684-6500 Fax: 561-697-2383
39
+
40
+ By: /s/Theodore J. Leopold, Esq.
41
+
42
+ THEODORE J. LEOPOLD Florida Bar No. 705608 tleopold@riccilaw.com
43
+
44
+ I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was filed electronically on January 29th , 2008 with the Clerk of the Court through ECF, and that ECF will send an e-notice of the electronic filing to the following: Jeffrey M. Herman, iherman@hermanlaw.com; Stuart S. Mermelstein, smermelstein@,hermanlaw.com; Adam D. Horowitz, ahorowitz@hennanlaw.com.
45
+
46
+ /s/Theodore J. Leopold, Esq.
47
+
48
+ THEODORE J. LEOPOLD, ESQ.
49
+
50
+ Florida Bar No. 705608
51
+
52
+ RICO-LEOPOLD, P.A.
53
+
54
+ 2925 PGA Boulevard, Suite 200
55
+
56
+ Palm Beach Gardens FL 33410
57
+
58
+ Phone: 561-684-6500;
59
+
60
+ Fax: 561-515-2610
61
+
62
+ Email: tleopold@riecilaw.com
marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743503/EFTA02743503.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,212 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743503.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 3,
15
+ "chars": 3778,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 0.97,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 196.452,
27
+ 101.25
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 408.0064392089844,
31
+ 101.25
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 408.0064392089844,
35
+ 128.9830322265625
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 196.452,
39
+ 128.9830322265625
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "MOTION TO INTERVENE AND SUPPORTING MEMORANDUM OF LAW",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 95.47200000000001,
50
+ 404.9815673828125
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 506.4704895019531,
54
+ 404.9815673828125
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 506.4704895019531,
58
+ 418.85302734375
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 95.47200000000001,
62
+ 418.85302734375
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ },
66
+ {
67
+ "title": "MEMORANDUM OF LAW",
68
+ "heading_level": null,
69
+ "page_id": 1,
70
+ "polygon": [
71
+ [
72
+ 226.44,
73
+ 183.87
74
+ ],
75
+ [
76
+ 378.5997619628906,
77
+ 183.87
78
+ ],
79
+ [
80
+ 378.5997619628906,
81
+ 198.43353271484375
82
+ ],
83
+ [
84
+ 226.44,
85
+ 198.43353271484375
86
+ ]
87
+ ]
88
+ }
89
+ ],
90
+ "page_stats": [
91
+ {
92
+ "page_id": 0,
93
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
94
+ "block_counts": [
95
+ [
96
+ "Span",
97
+ 47
98
+ ],
99
+ [
100
+ "Line",
101
+ 24
102
+ ],
103
+ [
104
+ "Text",
105
+ 7
106
+ ],
107
+ [
108
+ "ListItem",
109
+ 4
110
+ ],
111
+ [
112
+ "SectionHeader",
113
+ 2
114
+ ],
115
+ [
116
+ "PageHeader",
117
+ 1
118
+ ],
119
+ [
120
+ "ListGroup",
121
+ 1
122
+ ],
123
+ [
124
+ "PageFooter",
125
+ 1
126
+ ]
127
+ ],
128
+ "block_metadata": {
129
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
130
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
131
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
132
+ "previous_text": "",
133
+ "previous_type": "",
134
+ "previous_order": 0
135
+ }
136
+ },
137
+ {
138
+ "page_id": 1,
139
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
140
+ "block_counts": [
141
+ [
142
+ "Span",
143
+ 41
144
+ ],
145
+ [
146
+ "Line",
147
+ 21
148
+ ],
149
+ [
150
+ "Text",
151
+ 3
152
+ ],
153
+ [
154
+ "PageFooter",
155
+ 2
156
+ ],
157
+ [
158
+ "PageHeader",
159
+ 1
160
+ ],
161
+ [
162
+ "SectionHeader",
163
+ 1
164
+ ]
165
+ ],
166
+ "block_metadata": {
167
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
168
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
169
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
170
+ "previous_text": "",
171
+ "previous_type": "",
172
+ "previous_order": 0
173
+ }
174
+ },
175
+ {
176
+ "page_id": 2,
177
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
178
+ "block_counts": [
179
+ [
180
+ "Span",
181
+ 65
182
+ ],
183
+ [
184
+ "Line",
185
+ 30
186
+ ],
187
+ [
188
+ "Text",
189
+ 16
190
+ ],
191
+ [
192
+ "PageFooter",
193
+ 2
194
+ ],
195
+ [
196
+ "PageHeader",
197
+ 1
198
+ ]
199
+ ],
200
+ "block_metadata": {
201
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
202
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
203
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
204
+ "previous_text": "",
205
+ "previous_type": "",
206
+ "previous_order": 0
207
+ }
208
+ }
209
+ ],
210
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02743503"
211
+ }
212
+ }
marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743506/EFTA02743506.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,178 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ **IN THE CIRCUIT COURT
2
+ OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL
3
+ COURT IN AND FOR PALM
4
+ BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA**
5
+
6
+ **FAMILY DIVISION**
7
+
8
+ CASE NO. [REDACTED]
9
+
10
+ 2006 APR 20 PM 1:18
11
+ JUDICIAL COURT
12
+
13
+ **IN RE: THE FORMER MARRIAGE OF**
14
+
15
+ [REDACTED],
16
+
17
+ Petitioner/Former Wife,
18
+
19
+ vs.
20
+
21
+ [REDACTED]
22
+
23
+ Respondent/Former Husband
24
+
25
+ \_\_\_\_\_/
26
+
27
+ **CUSTODIAL PARENT MODIFICATION**
28
+
29
+ THIS AGREEMENT is made in Palm Beach County, Florida between [REDACTED]
30
+
31
+ [REDACTED], hereinafter referred to as the "Former Wife" and [REDACTED]
32
+
33
+ [REDACTED] hereinafter referred to as "Former Husband".
34
+
35
+ In consideration of the mutual undertakings herein contained, the parties agree as follows:
36
+
37
+ **1. STATUS OF PARTIES:**
38
+
39
+ The parties were divorced on June 18, 1991.
40
+
41
+ The custodial parent circumstances of the parties have changed, they desire to adjust their responsibilities for custodial parent of their minor children.
42
+
43
+ DLS
44
+ *[Signature]*
45
+ 332
46
+
47
+ ![](_page_0_Picture_107.jpeg)
48
+
49
+ DAG
50
+ *[Signature]*
51
+
52
+ DATA BALLY BY
53
+ MLP
54
+ A LEGAL DISCRETO
55
+
56
+ LAVOGUEla ands Case No.
57
+
58
+ #### 2. PURPOSE OF AGREEMENT AND CONSIDERATION:
59
+
60
+ The purpose of this Agreement is to effect a complete settlement, with reference to the parties's obligations with respect to the visitation and parental responsibility of the two minor children, and
61
+
62
+ #### 3. CUSTODY OF MINOR CHILDREN:
63
+
64
+ Full Parental Custody of both minor children shall be granted to Former Husband. Both minor children shall reside with Former Husband in Florida.
65
+
66
+ #### 4. VISITATION:
67
+
68
+ Former Wife shall be entitled to open communication between herself and minor children. Former Wife shall receive visitation as often as children desire but shall be at minimum once a year. All plane fare for said visitation shall be at the expense of Former Wife except in such case Former Husband shall for any reason need children to commute to Former Wife in Georgia for personal, emergency, or necessary reasons then Former Husband shall pay for said plane fare.
69
+
70
+ #### 5. FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY:
71
+
72
+ Former Husband shall hold complete financial responsibity for both minor children including but not limited to all medical, dental, vision, etc. care and or insurance. Former Husband shall be granted both Florida Prepaid College Programs for both minor children and be responsible for college tuition, etc. payments. Former Husband shall claim both minor children on his personal income taxes beginning 2006 tax year.
73
+
74
+ O4 /
75
+
76
+ DLS
77
+
78
+ DA
79
+
80
+ LAVOGUEnra Case No.
81
+
82
+ #### 6. AGREEMENT BINDING:
83
+
84
+ This Agreement and all the obligations and covenants hereunder shall bind the parties hereto, their heirs, executors, administrators, legal representatives and assigns.
85
+
86
+ #### 7. REPRESENTATIONS:
87
+
88
+ The parties represent to each other that:
89
+
90
+ - A. The parties fully understand the facts as to their legal rights and obligations. Each is signing the Agreement freely and voluntarily, intending to be bound by it.
91
+ - B. The laws of Florida shall govern the validity, construction, interpretation and effect of this Agreement.
92
+ - C. Neither party is represented by legal counsel.
93
+
94
+ #### 8. PARAGRAPH HEADINGS:
95
+
96
+ Paragraph headings are provided for convenience in locating paragraphs and are not intended to add or detract anything from language of the paragraphs.
97
+
98
+ DLS DAG
99
+
100
+ LAVOGUE-S [REDACTED] and [REDACTED]
101
+ Case No. [REDACTED]
102
+
103
+ STATE OF FLORIDA
104
+ COUNTY OF PALM BEACH
105
+
106
+ BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, this 28<sup>th</sup> day of March, 2006, personally appeared [REDACTED] who is personally known to me        or has provided a valid Georgia Driver's License ✓      , and who after being duly sworn, deposes and says that she is Former Wife in the above and foregoing Agreement; that she has read the foregoing Agreement and that she has executed the same freely and voluntarily for the purposes therein expressed.
107
+
108
+ ![](_page_3_Picture_17.jpeg)
109
+
110
+ Jammy S Parker
111
+
112
+ Notary Public
113
+ My Commission Expires:
114
+
115
+ BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, this 28<sup>th</sup> day of March, 2006, personally appeared [REDACTED] who is personally known to me ✓       or has provided a valid Florida Driver's License       , and who after being duly sworn, deposes and says that he is Former husband in the above and foregoing Agreement; that he has read the foregoing Agreement and that he has executed the same freely and voluntarily for the purposes therein expressed.
116
+
117
+ [Handwritten Signature]
118
+
119
+ Notary Public
120
+ My Commission Expires: 5-4-07
121
+
122
+ YVETTE SOSA
123
+ NOTARY PUBLIC
124
+ COMMISSION NO. DD209030
125
+
126
+ LAVOGUE [REDACTED] and [REDACTED]
127
+ Case No. [REDACTED]
128
+
129
+ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have signed and acknowledged this
130
+
131
+ Agreement in the presence of the witnesses signing below on this 28 day of
132
+ MARCH
133
+ April, 2006.
134
+
135
+ ![]()![]()![]()![]()![]()![]()![]()![]()IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL COURT
136
+ IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
137
+
138
+ IN RE: THE FORMER MARRIAGE OF
139
+
140
+ [REDACTED]
141
+
142
+ Petitioner/Former Wife,
143
+
144
+ and
145
+
146
+ [REDACTED]
147
+
148
+ Respondent/Former Husband
149
+
150
+ \_\_\_\_\_/\_\_\_\_\_
151
+
152
+ FAMILY DIVISION
153
+
154
+ CASE NO. [REDACTED]
155
+
156
+ CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL COURT
157
+
158
+ ORDER GRANTING CUSTODIAL PARENT MODIFICATION
159
+
160
+ COMES NOW before the court the CUSTODIAL PARENT MODIFICATION and the court having been advised that the parties are in agreement, it is:
161
+
162
+ ORDERED and ADJUDGED that said Custodial Parent Modification be GRANTED.
163
+
164
+ DONE AND ORDERED in [REDACTED] this 25th day of April, 2006.
165
+
166
+ ![]()WILLIAM J. BERGER
167
+
168
+ cc: [REDACTED]
169
+ 411 Christophers Ct.
170
+ Waleska, GA 30183
171
+
172
+ [REDACTED]
173
+ [REDACTED]
174
+ [REDACTED]
175
+
176
+ [Stamp: 233]
177
+
178
+ CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL COURT
marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743506/EFTA02743506.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,570 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743506.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 6,
15
+ "chars": 5524,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 6.75,
17
+ "image_assets": [
18
+ "_page_0_Picture_107.jpeg",
19
+ "_page_3_Picture_17.jpeg"
20
+ ],
21
+ "marker_metadata": {
22
+ "table_of_contents": [
23
+ {
24
+ "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL COURT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA",
25
+ "heading_level": null,
26
+ "page_id": 0,
27
+ "polygon": [
28
+ [
29
+ 361.66999999999996,
30
+ 64.069
31
+ ],
32
+ [
33
+ 543.731,
34
+ 64.069
35
+ ],
36
+ [
37
+ 543.731,
38
+ 120.02799999999999
39
+ ],
40
+ [
41
+ 361.66999999999996,
42
+ 120.02799999999999
43
+ ]
44
+ ]
45
+ },
46
+ {
47
+ "title": "FAMILY DIVISION",
48
+ "heading_level": null,
49
+ "page_id": 0,
50
+ "polygon": [
51
+ [
52
+ 361.66999999999996,
53
+ 133.00400000000002
54
+ ],
55
+ [
56
+ 467.71899999999994,
57
+ 133.00400000000002
58
+ ],
59
+ [
60
+ 467.71899999999994,
61
+ 146.791
62
+ ],
63
+ [
64
+ 361.66999999999996,
65
+ 146.791
66
+ ]
67
+ ]
68
+ },
69
+ {
70
+ "title": "IN RE: THE FORMER MARRIAGE OF",
71
+ "heading_level": null,
72
+ "page_id": 0,
73
+ "polygon": [
74
+ [
75
+ 67.43,
76
+ 213.29299999999998
77
+ ],
78
+ [
79
+ 285.045,
80
+ 213.29299999999998
81
+ ],
82
+ [
83
+ 285.045,
84
+ 227.89100000000002
85
+ ],
86
+ [
87
+ 67.43,
88
+ 227.89100000000002
89
+ ]
90
+ ]
91
+ },
92
+ {
93
+ "title": "CUSTODIAL PARENT MODIFICATION",
94
+ "heading_level": null,
95
+ "page_id": 0,
96
+ "polygon": [
97
+ [
98
+ 194.93399999999997,
99
+ 420.09799999999996
100
+ ],
101
+ [
102
+ 416.84000000000003,
103
+ 420.09799999999996
104
+ ],
105
+ [
106
+ 416.84000000000003,
107
+ 433.885
108
+ ],
109
+ [
110
+ 194.93399999999997,
111
+ 433.885
112
+ ]
113
+ ]
114
+ },
115
+ {
116
+ "title": "1. STATUS OF PARTIES:",
117
+ "heading_level": null,
118
+ "page_id": 0,
119
+ "polygon": [
120
+ [
121
+ 64.978,
122
+ 596.0849999999999
123
+ ],
124
+ [
125
+ 223.74499999999998,
126
+ 596.0849999999999
127
+ ],
128
+ [
129
+ 223.74499999999998,
130
+ 612.305
131
+ ],
132
+ [
133
+ 64.978,
134
+ 612.305
135
+ ]
136
+ ]
137
+ },
138
+ {
139
+ "title": "2. PURPOSE OF AGREEMENT AND CONSIDERATION:",
140
+ "heading_level": null,
141
+ "page_id": 1,
142
+ "polygon": [
143
+ [
144
+ 104.63001251220703,
145
+ 124.083
146
+ ],
147
+ [
148
+ 399.06300000000005,
149
+ 124.083
150
+ ],
151
+ [
152
+ 399.06300000000005,
153
+ 138.681
154
+ ],
155
+ [
156
+ 104.63001251220703,
157
+ 138.681
158
+ ]
159
+ ]
160
+ },
161
+ {
162
+ "title": "3. CUSTODY OF MINOR CHILDREN:",
163
+ "heading_level": null,
164
+ "page_id": 1,
165
+ "polygon": [
166
+ [
167
+ 103.91000366210938,
168
+ 236.81199999999998
169
+ ],
170
+ [
171
+ 300.983,
172
+ 236.81199999999998
173
+ ],
174
+ [
175
+ 300.983,
176
+ 251.41
177
+ ],
178
+ [
179
+ 103.91000366210938,
180
+ 251.41
181
+ ]
182
+ ]
183
+ },
184
+ {
185
+ "title": "4. VISITATION:",
186
+ "heading_level": null,
187
+ "page_id": 1,
188
+ "polygon": [
189
+ [
190
+ 62.52599999999999,
191
+ 324.40000000000003
192
+ ],
193
+ [
194
+ 200.451,
195
+ 324.40000000000003
196
+ ],
197
+ [
198
+ 200.451,
199
+ 338.18699999999995
200
+ ],
201
+ [
202
+ 62.52599999999999,
203
+ 338.18699999999995
204
+ ]
205
+ ]
206
+ },
207
+ {
208
+ "title": "5. FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY:",
209
+ "heading_level": null,
210
+ "page_id": 1,
211
+ "polygon": [
212
+ [
213
+ 62.52599999999999,
214
+ 509.30800000000005
215
+ ],
216
+ [
217
+ 280.754,
218
+ 509.30800000000005
219
+ ],
220
+ [
221
+ 280.754,
222
+ 523.906
223
+ ],
224
+ [
225
+ 62.52599999999999,
226
+ 523.906
227
+ ]
228
+ ]
229
+ },
230
+ {
231
+ "title": "6. AGREEMENT BINDING:",
232
+ "heading_level": null,
233
+ "page_id": 2,
234
+ "polygon": [
235
+ [
236
+ 110.33999999999999,
237
+ 125.705
238
+ ],
239
+ [
240
+ 255.72698974609375,
241
+ 125.705
242
+ ],
243
+ [
244
+ 255.72698974609375,
245
+ 140.30299999999997
246
+ ],
247
+ [
248
+ 110.33999999999999,
249
+ 140.30299999999997
250
+ ]
251
+ ]
252
+ },
253
+ {
254
+ "title": "7. REPRESENTATIONS:",
255
+ "heading_level": null,
256
+ "page_id": 2,
257
+ "polygon": [
258
+ [
259
+ 108.50099999999998,
260
+ 214.104
261
+ ],
262
+ [
263
+ 239.07,
264
+ 214.104
265
+ ],
266
+ [
267
+ 239.07,
268
+ 228.70199999999997
269
+ ],
270
+ [
271
+ 108.50099999999998,
272
+ 228.70199999999997
273
+ ]
274
+ ]
275
+ },
276
+ {
277
+ "title": "8. PARAGRAPH HEADINGS:",
278
+ "heading_level": null,
279
+ "page_id": 2,
280
+ "polygon": [
281
+ [
282
+ 104.21000000000001,
283
+ 423.34200000000004
284
+ ],
285
+ [
286
+ 261.7464904785156,
287
+ 423.34200000000004
288
+ ],
289
+ [
290
+ 261.7464904785156,
291
+ 437.94
292
+ ],
293
+ [
294
+ 104.21000000000001,
295
+ 437.94
296
+ ]
297
+ ]
298
+ },
299
+ {
300
+ "title": "IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL COURT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA",
301
+ "heading_level": null,
302
+ "page_id": 5,
303
+ "polygon": [
304
+ [
305
+ 125.66499999999998,
306
+ 78.667
307
+ ],
308
+ [
309
+ 496.53000000000003,
310
+ 78.667
311
+ ],
312
+ [
313
+ 496.53000000000003,
314
+ 107.052
315
+ ],
316
+ [
317
+ 125.66499999999998,
318
+ 107.052
319
+ ]
320
+ ]
321
+ },
322
+ {
323
+ "title": "ORDER GRANTING CUSTODIAL PARENT MODIFICATION",
324
+ "heading_level": null,
325
+ "page_id": 5,
326
+ "polygon": [
327
+ [
328
+ 139.764,
329
+ 325.211
330
+ ],
331
+ [
332
+ 478.14,
333
+ 325.211
334
+ ],
335
+ [
336
+ 478.14,
337
+ 339.80899999999997
338
+ ],
339
+ [
340
+ 139.764,
341
+ 339.80899999999997
342
+ ]
343
+ ]
344
+ }
345
+ ],
346
+ "page_stats": [
347
+ {
348
+ "page_id": 0,
349
+ "text_extraction_method": "surya",
350
+ "block_counts": [
351
+ [
352
+ "Span",
353
+ 40
354
+ ],
355
+ [
356
+ "Text",
357
+ 34
358
+ ],
359
+ [
360
+ "Line",
361
+ 21
362
+ ],
363
+ [
364
+ "SectionHeader",
365
+ 10
366
+ ],
367
+ [
368
+ "PageHeader",
369
+ 2
370
+ ],
371
+ [
372
+ "Picture",
373
+ 2
374
+ ],
375
+ [
376
+ "PageFooter",
377
+ 2
378
+ ]
379
+ ],
380
+ "block_metadata": {
381
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
382
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
383
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
384
+ "previous_text": "",
385
+ "previous_type": "",
386
+ "previous_order": 0
387
+ }
388
+ },
389
+ {
390
+ "page_id": 1,
391
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
392
+ "block_counts": [
393
+ [
394
+ "Span",
395
+ 57
396
+ ],
397
+ [
398
+ "Line",
399
+ 28
400
+ ],
401
+ [
402
+ "Text",
403
+ 9
404
+ ],
405
+ [
406
+ "SectionHeader",
407
+ 4
408
+ ],
409
+ [
410
+ "PageFooter",
411
+ 2
412
+ ],
413
+ [
414
+ "PageHeader",
415
+ 1
416
+ ]
417
+ ],
418
+ "block_metadata": {
419
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
420
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
421
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
422
+ "previous_text": "",
423
+ "previous_type": "",
424
+ "previous_order": 0
425
+ }
426
+ },
427
+ {
428
+ "page_id": 2,
429
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
430
+ "block_counts": [
431
+ [
432
+ "Span",
433
+ 151
434
+ ],
435
+ [
436
+ "Line",
437
+ 20
438
+ ],
439
+ [
440
+ "Text",
441
+ 6
442
+ ],
443
+ [
444
+ "SectionHeader",
445
+ 3
446
+ ],
447
+ [
448
+ "ListItem",
449
+ 3
450
+ ],
451
+ [
452
+ "PageFooter",
453
+ 2
454
+ ],
455
+ [
456
+ "PageHeader",
457
+ 1
458
+ ],
459
+ [
460
+ "ListGroup",
461
+ 1
462
+ ]
463
+ ],
464
+ "block_metadata": {
465
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
466
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
467
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
468
+ "previous_text": "",
469
+ "previous_type": "",
470
+ "previous_order": 0
471
+ }
472
+ },
473
+ {
474
+ "page_id": 3,
475
+ "text_extraction_method": "surya",
476
+ "block_counts": [
477
+ [
478
+ "Text",
479
+ 18
480
+ ],
481
+ [
482
+ "PageFooter",
483
+ 4
484
+ ],
485
+ [
486
+ "PageHeader",
487
+ 2
488
+ ],
489
+ [
490
+ "Picture",
491
+ 2
492
+ ]
493
+ ],
494
+ "block_metadata": {
495
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
496
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
497
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
498
+ "previous_text": "",
499
+ "previous_type": "",
500
+ "previous_order": 0
501
+ }
502
+ },
503
+ {
504
+ "page_id": 4,
505
+ "text_extraction_method": "surya",
506
+ "block_counts": [
507
+ [
508
+ "Text",
509
+ 23
510
+ ],
511
+ [
512
+ "PageFooter",
513
+ 4
514
+ ],
515
+ [
516
+ "PageHeader",
517
+ 2
518
+ ]
519
+ ],
520
+ "block_metadata": {
521
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
522
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
523
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
524
+ "previous_text": "",
525
+ "previous_type": "",
526
+ "previous_order": 0
527
+ }
528
+ },
529
+ {
530
+ "page_id": 5,
531
+ "text_extraction_method": "surya",
532
+ "block_counts": [
533
+ [
534
+ "Span",
535
+ 55
536
+ ],
537
+ [
538
+ "Text",
539
+ 39
540
+ ],
541
+ [
542
+ "Line",
543
+ 24
544
+ ],
545
+ [
546
+ "SectionHeader",
547
+ 4
548
+ ],
549
+ [
550
+ "PageHeader",
551
+ 2
552
+ ],
553
+ [
554
+ "PageFooter",
555
+ 2
556
+ ]
557
+ ],
558
+ "block_metadata": {
559
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
560
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
561
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
562
+ "previous_text": "",
563
+ "previous_type": "",
564
+ "previous_order": 0
565
+ }
566
+ }
567
+ ],
568
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02743506"
569
+ }
570
+ }
marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743506/_page_0_Picture_107.jpeg ADDED

Git LFS Details

  • SHA256: b6ca9f256d554e6f0eb7e2b2468f211eca144a3bf90f25da2cd7ad9d8ba433a3
  • Pointer size: 130 Bytes
  • Size of remote file: 12.2 kB
marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743506/_page_3_Picture_17.jpeg ADDED

Git LFS Details

  • SHA256: ffb54c343418d1d30fca8951460050a6b7b511c6f0f207630c2f057a60cc213d
  • Pointer size: 130 Bytes
  • Size of remote file: 19.6 kB
marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743512/EFTA02743512.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ #### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
2
+
3
+ CASE NO.: 08-80069-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON
4
+
5
+ JANE DOE NO. I, by and through JANE DOE's FATHER as parent and natural guardian, and JANE DOE's FATHER, and JANE DOE's STEPMOTHER, individually,
6
+
7
+ Plaintiffs,
8
+
9
+ vs.
10
+
11
+ JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
12
+
13
+ Defendant.
14
+
15
+ ### PLAINTIFFS' MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING JANE DOE NO. I REACHING AGE OF MAJORITY
16
+
17
+ Plaintiffs, Jane Doe No. I, by and through Jane Doe's Father as parent and natural guardian, and Jane Doe's Father and Jane Doe's Stepmother, individually, submit this Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Jane Doe No. 1 Reaching Age of Majority, as follows:
18
+
19
+ # I. Introduction
20
+
21
+ This action alleges the sexual assault of Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 1 ("Jane Doe") by the Defendant when she was 14 years old. The Motion to Stay Proceedings filed by Jane Doe's Mother is without basis and should be stricken or denied for the following reasons:
22
+
23
+ I. It fails to include or be accompanied by a memorandum of law, in violation of S.D.Fla.L.R. 7.I(A)( I). This failure is particularly glaring here, as there is no obvious or apparent legal basis for the stay sought by Jane Doe's Mother, and in preparing this Memorandum of Law in Opposition, Plaintiff is left to guess at the authorities relied upon by Jane Doe's Mother.
24
+
25
+ 2. The Motion to Stay was not served on all parties as shown on the Motion's Certificate of Service. Only Plaintiff's counsel was served with the Motion. As a result, notice of the relief sought by Jane Doe's Mother is fatally defective.
26
+
27
+ 3. Jane Doe's Father, by Court Order, was awarded full custody of the Minor Plaintiff, and is thus her sole natural guardian. Jane Doe's Mother is not Jane Doe's natural guardian under Florida law, and thus has no standing to seek a stay of this action on behalf of Jane Doe.
28
+
29
+ 4. A stay would serve no constructive purpose or function in this litigation, but would only unnecessarily delay this case.
30
+
31
+ Based on any or all of the foregoing grounds, as further discussed below, the Motion to Stay should be denied.
32
+
33
+ # II. Argument
34
+
35
+ ### THE MOTION TO STAY IS PROCEDURALLY AND SUBSTANTIVELY DEFECTIVE
36
+
37
+ ### A. The Motion to Stay Violates the Local Rules and Was Served Without Sufficient Notice
38
+
39
+ Under S.D.Fla.L.R. 7.1(A)(1), lelvery motion when filed shall include or be accompanied by a memorandum of law citing supporting authorities. . ."I No such memorandum of law was filed with the Motion to Stay. Plaintiff is prejudiced by this omission because he has had no notice of what authorities Jane Doe's Mother relies upon for the relief sought in her Motion. As a result, the Motion to Stay is defective and should be stricken.
40
+
41
+ The Motion to Stay also raises due process concerns because it was not served on all parties according to the Certificate of Service accompanying the Motion. The Defendant has not yet filed an appearance in the case, and his response to the Complaint is not yet due. The Motion to Stay is
42
+
43
+ <sup>&#</sup>x27; The stated exceptions to Rule 7.1(A)(1) are inapplicable here.
44
+
45
+ therefore premature and defective for lack of notice.
46
+
47
+ #### B. Jane Doe's Mother is Not Jane Doe's Natural Guardian, and Therefore Has No Standing to Seek a Stay on Her Behalf
48
+
49
+ The Motion to Stay and supporting Affidavit of Jane Doe's Mother contain the following false and misleading statements:
50
+
51
+ - a. "Jane Doe No. 1 is a minor child . . who is under the joint control of her parents and natural guardians, Jane Doe's Father and Jane Doe's Mother, who are divorced." (Motion to Stay Proceedings,1 1) (emphasis supplied).
52
+ - b. "I am the mother and natural guardian for Jane Doe No. I...." (Affidavit of Exh. "A" to Motion to Stay, 1 I) (emphasis supplied).
53
+
54
+ Jane Doe's Mother does not have "joint control" or legal custody of Jane Doe, and is not her natural guardian under Florida law. Jane Doe's Mother and Jane Doe's Father entered into a Custodial Parent Modification dated March 28, 2006. This Modification was granted by Court Order dated April 25, 2006. (A copy of the Custodial Parent Modification and the Order Granting Custodial Parent Modification are attached hereto as Composite Exhibit "A").2 The Custodial Parent Modification states as follows: "Full Parental Custody of both minor children shall be granted to former husband [Jane Does' Father]." (Custodial Parent Modification,1 3) (emphasis supplied).
55
+
56
+ Under Florida statutory law, in the case of a dissolved marriage, only the parent awarded custody can be the natural guardian of the minor child: "If the marriage between the parents is dissolved, the natural guardianship belongs to the parent to whom custody of the child is awarded." §744.301(1), Fla. Stat. (emphasis supplied). It is therefore abundantly clear that Jane
57
+
58
+ <sup>2</sup> The names of Jane Doe and Jane Doe's Father are redacted from Exhibit "A" hereto to protect the Minor Plaintiff's anonymity. (See Complaint 1 4).
59
+
60
+ Doe's Father, as the custodial parent, is the natural guardian, and the only natural guardian, of Jane Doe. As the natural guardian, Jane Doe's Father may sue on behalf of Jane Doe. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 17(b) (providing that capacity to sue or be sued shall be determined by the law of the state in which the district court is held). Because Jane Doe's Father, as her natural guardian, represents her interests in this lawsuit, there is no legal basis for Jane Doe's Mother to assert the right to represent Jane Doe. Jane Doe's Mother lacks standing to seek a stay or other relief from this Court on behalf of Jane Doe.
61
+
62
+ # C. There Is No Legal Basis for a Stay
63
+
64
+ A stay of proceedings may be appropriate in a situation where it will avoid piecemeal litigation, conserve judicial resources, aid in the comprehensive disposition of the litigation, or serve as a means of controlling the district court's docket. See American Manufacturers Mutual Ins. Co. v. Edward D. Jr. & Assoc., 743 F.2d 1519 (1 1 th Cir. 1984). For example, a stay may be considered in a case where there is another pending lawsuit or administrative proceeding addressing the identical issues. See Ortega Trujillo v. Conver & Co. Communications, Inc. 225 F.3d 1262 (11th Cir. 2000). Even then, a case in federal court should not be stayed absent "exceptional circumstances." American Manufacturers, 743 F.2d at 1524-1525. Here, the only conceivable purpose that would be served by a stay is delay, which would be to Jane Doe's prejudice. A stay would not be in the interests of judicial economy and efficiency, and would not aid in a resolution of this litigation. Because there is no legitimate argument for a stay in this case, the Motion should be denied.
65
+
66
+ ### III. Conclusion
67
+
68
+ Based on the foregoing, the Motion to Stay is defective, deficient and meritless. Denial of the Motion is appropriate on multiple, alternative grounds. Plaintiffs therefore respectfully request that the Motion to Stay be denied.
69
+
70
+ Dated: February 13, 2008 Respectfully submitted,
71
+
72
+ By: s/ Jeffrey M. Herman Jeffrey M. Herman (FL Bar No. 521647) jherman@hermanlaw.com Stuart S. Mermelstein (FL Bar No. 947245) smermelstein@hermanlaw.com Adam D. Horowitz (FL Bar No. 376980) ahorowitz@hermanlaw.com HERMAN & MERMELSTEIN, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiffs Jane Doe et al. 18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218 Miami, Florida 33160 Tel: 305-931-2200 Fax: 305-931-0877
73
+
74
+ #### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
75
+
76
+ I hereby certify that on February 13, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on the following, via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF:
77
+
78
+ Theodore Jon Leopold tleopold@riccilaw.com
79
+
80
+ /s/ Jeffrey M. Herman
marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743512/EFTA02743512.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,461 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743512.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 5,
15
+ "chars": 7745,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 1.1,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 206.24400000000003,
27
+ 72.08999999999999
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 405.95098876953125,
31
+ 72.08999999999999
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 405.95098876953125,
35
+ 100.4830322265625
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 206.24400000000003,
39
+ 100.4830322265625
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "PLAINTIFFS' MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION \nTO MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS PENDING \nJANE DOE NO. I REACHING AGE OF MAJORITY",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 143.82,
50
+ 322.38
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 468.011962890625,
54
+ 322.38
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 468.011962890625,
58
+ 366.363037109375
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 143.82,
62
+ 366.363037109375
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ },
66
+ {
67
+ "title": "I. Introduction",
68
+ "heading_level": null,
69
+ "page_id": 0,
70
+ "polygon": [
71
+ [
72
+ 252.144,
73
+ 490.04999999999995
74
+ ],
75
+ [
76
+ 359.68609619140625,
77
+ 490.04999999999995
78
+ ],
79
+ [
80
+ 359.68609619140625,
81
+ 506.2330322265625
82
+ ],
83
+ [
84
+ 252.144,
85
+ 506.2330322265625
86
+ ]
87
+ ]
88
+ },
89
+ {
90
+ "title": "II. Argument",
91
+ "heading_level": null,
92
+ "page_id": 1,
93
+ "polygon": [
94
+ [
95
+ 258.264,
96
+ 350.73
97
+ ],
98
+ [
99
+ 353.089599609375,
100
+ 350.73
101
+ ],
102
+ [
103
+ 353.089599609375,
104
+ 366.363037109375
105
+ ],
106
+ [
107
+ 258.264,
108
+ 366.363037109375
109
+ ]
110
+ ]
111
+ },
112
+ {
113
+ "title": "THE MOTION TO STAY IS PROCEDURALLY \nAND SUBSTANTIVELY DEFECTIVE",
114
+ "heading_level": null,
115
+ "page_id": 1,
116
+ "polygon": [
117
+ [
118
+ 176.25599999999997,
119
+ 379.08000000000004
120
+ ],
121
+ [
122
+ 435.7791748046875,
123
+ 379.08000000000004
124
+ ],
125
+ [
126
+ 435.7791748046875,
127
+ 408.363037109375
128
+ ],
129
+ [
130
+ 176.25599999999997,
131
+ 408.363037109375
132
+ ]
133
+ ]
134
+ },
135
+ {
136
+ "title": "A. The Motion to Stay Violates the Local Rules \nand Was Served Without Sufficient Notice",
137
+ "heading_level": null,
138
+ "page_id": 1,
139
+ "polygon": [
140
+ [
141
+ 171.972,
142
+ 421.20000000000005
143
+ ],
144
+ [
145
+ 440.13018798828125,
146
+ 421.20000000000005
147
+ ],
148
+ [
149
+ 440.13018798828125,
150
+ 450.363037109375
151
+ ],
152
+ [
153
+ 171.972,
154
+ 450.363037109375
155
+ ]
156
+ ]
157
+ },
158
+ {
159
+ "title": "B. Jane Doe's Mother is Not Jane Doe's Natural Guardian, and \nTherefore Has No Standing to Seek a Stay on Her Behalf",
160
+ "heading_level": null,
161
+ "page_id": 2,
162
+ "polygon": [
163
+ [
164
+ 129.744,
165
+ 99.63
166
+ ],
167
+ [
168
+ 481.9713134765625,
169
+ 99.63
170
+ ],
171
+ [
172
+ 481.9713134765625,
173
+ 128.60302734375
174
+ ],
175
+ [
176
+ 129.744,
177
+ 128.60302734375
178
+ ]
179
+ ]
180
+ },
181
+ {
182
+ "title": "C. There Is No Legal Basis for a Stay",
183
+ "heading_level": null,
184
+ "page_id": 3,
185
+ "polygon": [
186
+ [
187
+ 197.676,
188
+ 266.49
189
+ ],
190
+ [
191
+ 414.58721923828125,
192
+ 266.49
193
+ ],
194
+ [
195
+ 414.58721923828125,
196
+ 282.06353759765625
197
+ ],
198
+ [
199
+ 197.676,
200
+ 282.06353759765625
201
+ ]
202
+ ]
203
+ },
204
+ {
205
+ "title": "III. Conclusion",
206
+ "heading_level": null,
207
+ "page_id": 4,
208
+ "polygon": [
209
+ [
210
+ 256.428,
211
+ 72.08999999999999
212
+ ],
213
+ [
214
+ 355.39495849609375,
215
+ 72.08999999999999
216
+ ],
217
+ [
218
+ 355.39495849609375,
219
+ 86.60302734375
220
+ ],
221
+ [
222
+ 256.428,
223
+ 86.60302734375
224
+ ]
225
+ ]
226
+ },
227
+ {
228
+ "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
229
+ "heading_level": null,
230
+ "page_id": 4,
231
+ "polygon": [
232
+ [
233
+ 227.052,
234
+ 474.65999999999997
235
+ ],
236
+ [
237
+ 385.0019836425781,
238
+ 474.65999999999997
239
+ ],
240
+ [
241
+ 385.0019836425781,
242
+ 488.9830322265625
243
+ ],
244
+ [
245
+ 227.052,
246
+ 488.9830322265625
247
+ ]
248
+ ]
249
+ }
250
+ ],
251
+ "page_stats": [
252
+ {
253
+ "page_id": 0,
254
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
255
+ "block_counts": [
256
+ [
257
+ "Span",
258
+ 61
259
+ ],
260
+ [
261
+ "Line",
262
+ 30
263
+ ],
264
+ [
265
+ "Text",
266
+ 9
267
+ ],
268
+ [
269
+ "PageFooter",
270
+ 4
271
+ ],
272
+ [
273
+ "SectionHeader",
274
+ 3
275
+ ],
276
+ [
277
+ "PageHeader",
278
+ 1
279
+ ]
280
+ ],
281
+ "block_metadata": {
282
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
283
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
284
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
285
+ "previous_text": "",
286
+ "previous_type": "",
287
+ "previous_order": 0
288
+ }
289
+ },
290
+ {
291
+ "page_id": 1,
292
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
293
+ "block_counts": [
294
+ [
295
+ "Span",
296
+ 59
297
+ ],
298
+ [
299
+ "Line",
300
+ 28
301
+ ],
302
+ [
303
+ "Text",
304
+ 6
305
+ ],
306
+ [
307
+ "PageFooter",
308
+ 4
309
+ ],
310
+ [
311
+ "SectionHeader",
312
+ 3
313
+ ],
314
+ [
315
+ "PageHeader",
316
+ 1
317
+ ],
318
+ [
319
+ "Footnote",
320
+ 1
321
+ ]
322
+ ],
323
+ "block_metadata": {
324
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
325
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
326
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
327
+ "previous_text": "",
328
+ "previous_type": "",
329
+ "previous_order": 0
330
+ }
331
+ },
332
+ {
333
+ "page_id": 2,
334
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
335
+ "block_counts": [
336
+ [
337
+ "Span",
338
+ 63
339
+ ],
340
+ [
341
+ "Line",
342
+ 30
343
+ ],
344
+ [
345
+ "Text",
346
+ 4
347
+ ],
348
+ [
349
+ "PageFooter",
350
+ 4
351
+ ],
352
+ [
353
+ "ListItem",
354
+ 2
355
+ ],
356
+ [
357
+ "PageHeader",
358
+ 1
359
+ ],
360
+ [
361
+ "SectionHeader",
362
+ 1
363
+ ],
364
+ [
365
+ "ListGroup",
366
+ 1
367
+ ],
368
+ [
369
+ "Footnote",
370
+ 1
371
+ ]
372
+ ],
373
+ "block_metadata": {
374
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
375
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
376
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
377
+ "previous_text": "",
378
+ "previous_type": "",
379
+ "previous_order": 0
380
+ }
381
+ },
382
+ {
383
+ "page_id": 3,
384
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
385
+ "block_counts": [
386
+ [
387
+ "Span",
388
+ 55
389
+ ],
390
+ [
391
+ "Line",
392
+ 24
393
+ ],
394
+ [
395
+ "PageFooter",
396
+ 4
397
+ ],
398
+ [
399
+ "Text",
400
+ 2
401
+ ],
402
+ [
403
+ "PageHeader",
404
+ 1
405
+ ],
406
+ [
407
+ "SectionHeader",
408
+ 1
409
+ ]
410
+ ],
411
+ "block_metadata": {
412
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
413
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
414
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
415
+ "previous_text": "",
416
+ "previous_type": "",
417
+ "previous_order": 0
418
+ }
419
+ },
420
+ {
421
+ "page_id": 4,
422
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
423
+ "block_counts": [
424
+ [
425
+ "Span",
426
+ 57
427
+ ],
428
+ [
429
+ "Line",
430
+ 29
431
+ ],
432
+ [
433
+ "Text",
434
+ 7
435
+ ],
436
+ [
437
+ "PageFooter",
438
+ 4
439
+ ],
440
+ [
441
+ "SectionHeader",
442
+ 2
443
+ ],
444
+ [
445
+ "PageHeader",
446
+ 1
447
+ ]
448
+ ],
449
+ "block_metadata": {
450
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
451
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
452
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
453
+ "previous_text": "",
454
+ "previous_type": "",
455
+ "previous_order": 0
456
+ }
457
+ }
458
+ ],
459
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02743512"
460
+ }
461
+ }
marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743517/EFTA02743517.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
2
+
3
+ CASE NO.: 08-80069-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON
4
+
5
+ JANE DOE NO. I, by and through JANE DOE's FATHER as parent and natural guardian, and JANE DOE's FATHER, and JANE DOE's STEPMOTHER, individually,
6
+
7
+ Plaintiffs,
8
+
9
+ vs.
10
+
11
+ JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
12
+
13
+ Defendant.
14
+
15
+ ## PLAINTIFFS' NOTICE OF NON-OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO INTERVENE FILED BY JANE DOE'S MOTHER
16
+
17
+ Plaintiff, Jane Doe No. I, by and through Jane Doe's Father as parent and natural guardian, and Jane Doe's Father and Jane Doe's Stepmother individually, hereby advise the Court that, upon review of the Motion to Intervene and Supporting Memorandum of law filed by Jane Doe's Mother, and the Intervenor's Complaint attached thereto as Exhibit "A", Plaintiffs have no opposition to Jane Doe's Mother's intervention for the purpose of asserting the claims set forth in the Intervenor's Complaint attached to her Motion.
18
+
19
+ Dated: February 14, 2008 Respectfully submitted,
20
+
21
+ By: s/ Jeffrey M. Herman Jeffrey M. Herman (FL Bar No. 521647) jherman@hermanlaw.com Stuart S. Mermelstein (FL Bar No. 947245) smermelstein@hermanlaw.com Adam D. Horowitz (FL Bar No. 376980) ahorowitz@hermanlaw.com HERMAN & MERMELSTEIN, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiffs Jane Doe et at 18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218
22
+
23
+ Miami, Florida 33160
24
+
25
+ Tel: 305-931-2200
26
+
27
+ Fax: 305-931-0877
28
+
29
+ ## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
30
+
31
+ I hereby certify that on February 14, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on the following, via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF:
32
+
33
+ Theodore Jon Leopold
34
+
35
+ tleopold@riccilaw.com
36
+
37
+ /s/ Jeffrey M. Herman
marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743517/EFTA02743517.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,170 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743517.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 2,
15
+ "chars": 1712,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 0.86,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 206.24400000000003,
27
+ 71.28
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 405.95098876953125,
31
+ 71.28
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 405.95098876953125,
35
+ 100.4830322265625
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 206.24400000000003,
39
+ 100.4830322265625
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "PLAINTIFFS' NOTICE OF NON-OPPOSITION TO MOTION \nTO INTERVENE FILED BY JANE DOE'S MOTHER",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 138.312,
50
+ 322.38
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 473.23699951171875,
54
+ 322.38
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 473.23699951171875,
58
+ 352.10302734375
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 138.312,
62
+ 352.10302734375
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ },
66
+ {
67
+ "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
68
+ "heading_level": null,
69
+ "page_id": 1,
70
+ "polygon": [
71
+ [
72
+ 227.052,
73
+ 180.63
74
+ ],
75
+ [
76
+ 385.0019836425781,
77
+ 180.63
78
+ ],
79
+ [
80
+ 385.0019836425781,
81
+ 195.363037109375
82
+ ],
83
+ [
84
+ 227.052,
85
+ 195.363037109375
86
+ ]
87
+ ]
88
+ }
89
+ ],
90
+ "page_stats": [
91
+ {
92
+ "page_id": 0,
93
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
94
+ "block_counts": [
95
+ [
96
+ "Span",
97
+ 68
98
+ ],
99
+ [
100
+ "Line",
101
+ 34
102
+ ],
103
+ [
104
+ "Text",
105
+ 12
106
+ ],
107
+ [
108
+ "SectionHeader",
109
+ 2
110
+ ],
111
+ [
112
+ "PageFooter",
113
+ 2
114
+ ],
115
+ [
116
+ "PageHeader",
117
+ 1
118
+ ]
119
+ ],
120
+ "block_metadata": {
121
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
122
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
123
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
124
+ "previous_text": "",
125
+ "previous_type": "",
126
+ "previous_order": 0
127
+ }
128
+ },
129
+ {
130
+ "page_id": 1,
131
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
132
+ "block_counts": [
133
+ [
134
+ "Span",
135
+ 25
136
+ ],
137
+ [
138
+ "Line",
139
+ 13
140
+ ],
141
+ [
142
+ "Text",
143
+ 7
144
+ ],
145
+ [
146
+ "PageFooter",
147
+ 4
148
+ ],
149
+ [
150
+ "PageHeader",
151
+ 1
152
+ ],
153
+ [
154
+ "SectionHeader",
155
+ 1
156
+ ]
157
+ ],
158
+ "block_metadata": {
159
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
160
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
161
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
162
+ "previous_text": "",
163
+ "previous_type": "",
164
+ "previous_order": 0
165
+ }
166
+ }
167
+ ],
168
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02743517"
169
+ }
170
+ }
marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743519/EFTA02743519.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
2
+
3
+ CASE NO.: 08-80069-CIV-MARRA,
4
+
5
+ JANE DOE NO. I, by and through JANE DOE's FATHER as parent and natural guardian, and JANE DOE's FATHER, and JANE DOE's STEPMOTHER, individually,
6
+
7
+ Plaintiffs,
8
+
9
+ vs.
10
+
11
+ JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
12
+
13
+ Defendant.
14
+
15
+ ## NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE
16
+
17
+ Plaintiffs, Jane Doe No. 1 by and through Jane Doe's Father as parent and natural guardian, and Jane Doe's Father, and Jane Doe's Stepmother, individually, hereby give notice of their voluntary dismissal of this action against all Defendant Jeffrey Epstein without prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(1XA).
18
+
19
+ Dated: February 22, 2008 Respectfully submitted,
20
+
21
+ By: s/ Jeffrey M. Herman
22
+
23
+ Jeffrey M. Herman (FL Bar No. 521647) jherman@hermanlaw.com
24
+
25
+ Stuart S. Mermelstein (FL Bar No. 947245) smermelstein@hermanlaw.com
26
+
27
+ Adam D. Horowitz (FL Bar No. 376980) ahorowitz@hermanlaw.com
28
+
29
+ HERMAN & MERMELSTEIN, P.A. Attorneys for Plaintiffs Jane Doe et at
30
+
31
+ 18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218
32
+
33
+ Miami, Florida 33160
34
+
35
+ Tel: 305-931-2200
36
+
37
+ Fax: 305-931-0877
38
+
39
+ ## CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
40
+
41
+ I hereby certify that on February 22, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on the following, via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF:
42
+
43
+ Theodore Jon Leopold tleopold@riccilaw.com
44
+
45
+ and by mail to:
46
+
47
+ Jeffrey Epstein 9 East 71st Street New York, NY 10021
48
+
49
+ /s/ Jeffrey M. Herman
marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743519/EFTA02743519.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,170 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743519.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 2,
15
+ "chars": 1533,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 1.38,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 206.24400000000003,
27
+ 72.08999999999999
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 405.95098876953125,
31
+ 72.08999999999999
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 405.95098876953125,
35
+ 100.4830322265625
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 206.24400000000003,
39
+ 100.4830322265625
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 127.90799999999999,
50
+ 322.38
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 484.1815185546875,
54
+ 322.38
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 484.1815185546875,
58
+ 338.2330322265625
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 127.90799999999999,
62
+ 338.2330322265625
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ },
66
+ {
67
+ "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE",
68
+ "heading_level": null,
69
+ "page_id": 1,
70
+ "polygon": [
71
+ [
72
+ 227.66400000000002,
73
+ 71.28
74
+ ],
75
+ [
76
+ 385.0019836425781,
77
+ 71.28
78
+ ],
79
+ [
80
+ 385.0019836425781,
81
+ 85.863037109375
82
+ ],
83
+ [
84
+ 227.66400000000002,
85
+ 85.863037109375
86
+ ]
87
+ ]
88
+ }
89
+ ],
90
+ "page_stats": [
91
+ {
92
+ "page_id": 0,
93
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
94
+ "block_counts": [
95
+ [
96
+ "Span",
97
+ 69
98
+ ],
99
+ [
100
+ "Line",
101
+ 34
102
+ ],
103
+ [
104
+ "Text",
105
+ 18
106
+ ],
107
+ [
108
+ "PageFooter",
109
+ 4
110
+ ],
111
+ [
112
+ "SectionHeader",
113
+ 2
114
+ ],
115
+ [
116
+ "PageHeader",
117
+ 1
118
+ ]
119
+ ],
120
+ "block_metadata": {
121
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
122
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
123
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
124
+ "previous_text": "",
125
+ "previous_type": "",
126
+ "previous_order": 0
127
+ }
128
+ },
129
+ {
130
+ "page_id": 1,
131
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
132
+ "block_counts": [
133
+ [
134
+ "Span",
135
+ 27
136
+ ],
137
+ [
138
+ "Line",
139
+ 14
140
+ ],
141
+ [
142
+ "Text",
143
+ 5
144
+ ],
145
+ [
146
+ "PageFooter",
147
+ 4
148
+ ],
149
+ [
150
+ "PageHeader",
151
+ 1
152
+ ],
153
+ [
154
+ "SectionHeader",
155
+ 1
156
+ ]
157
+ ],
158
+ "block_metadata": {
159
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
160
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
161
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
162
+ "previous_text": "",
163
+ "previous_type": "",
164
+ "previous_order": 0
165
+ }
166
+ }
167
+ ],
168
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02743519"
169
+ }
170
+ }
marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743521/EFTA02743521.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
2
+
3
+ CASE NO.08-80069-CIV-MARRA/
4
+
5
+ JANE DOE NO. I, by and through JANE DOE'S FATHER, as parent and natural guardian, JANE DOE'S FATHER, individually, and JANE DOE'S STEPMOTHER, individually
6
+
7
+ Plaintiffs,
8
+
9
+ vs.
10
+
11
+ JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
12
+
13
+ Defendants.
14
+
15
+ ## FINAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL
16
+
17
+ This Cause is before the Court upon Plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice (DE 9), filed February 22, 2008. The Court has reviewed the Notice, the pertinent portions of the record, and is otherwise advised in the premises. In accordance with Plaintiff's Notice, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:
18
+
19
+ - I. The above-styled action is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
20
+ - 2. All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT.
21
+ - 3. The Clerk shall CLOSE THIS CASE.
22
+
23
+ DONE and ORDERED in at West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida this 28\* day of February, 2008.
24
+
25
+ > KENNETH A. MARRA United States District Judge
26
+
27
+ Copies furnished to: All counsel of record
marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743521/EFTA02743521.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743521.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 1,
15
+ "chars": 992,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 0.88,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 206.24400000000003,
27
+ 71.28
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 405.5581359863281,
31
+ 71.28
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 405.5581359863281,
35
+ 100.4830322265625
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 206.24400000000003,
39
+ 100.4830322265625
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "FINAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 216.64799999999997,
50
+ 353.96999999999997
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 394.7751159667969,
54
+ 353.96999999999997
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 394.7751159667969,
58
+ 369.7330322265625
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 216.64799999999997,
62
+ 369.7330322265625
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ }
66
+ ],
67
+ "page_stats": [
68
+ {
69
+ "page_id": 0,
70
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
71
+ "block_counts": [
72
+ [
73
+ "Span",
74
+ 55
75
+ ],
76
+ [
77
+ "Line",
78
+ 28
79
+ ],
80
+ [
81
+ "Text",
82
+ 10
83
+ ],
84
+ [
85
+ "ListItem",
86
+ 3
87
+ ],
88
+ [
89
+ "SectionHeader",
90
+ 2
91
+ ],
92
+ [
93
+ "PageHeader",
94
+ 1
95
+ ],
96
+ [
97
+ "ListGroup",
98
+ 1
99
+ ],
100
+ [
101
+ "PageFooter",
102
+ 1
103
+ ]
104
+ ],
105
+ "block_metadata": {
106
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
107
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
108
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
109
+ "previous_text": "",
110
+ "previous_type": "",
111
+ "previous_order": 0
112
+ }
113
+ }
114
+ ],
115
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02743521"
116
+ }
117
+ }
marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/ocr-manifest.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,344 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_dir": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-v-epstein-80069",
3
+ "output_dir": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069",
4
+ "created_at": "2026-09-18T03:57:23.114450+00:00",
5
+ "updated_at": "2026-09-18T04:52:46.754243+00:00",
6
+ "tasks": {
7
+ "3d8de3a2d9b263930a76d2540a7f724b98868f014a0d6e7f6483b6838c632613": {
8
+ "sha": "3d8de3a2d9b263930a76d2540a7f724b98868f014a0d6e7f6483b6838c632613",
9
+ "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743481.pdf",
10
+ "name": "EFTA02743481.pdf",
11
+ "size": 820206,
12
+ "status": "done",
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "engine": {
15
+ "marker_major": "2",
16
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
17
+ "mode": "balanced",
18
+ "use_llm": false,
19
+ "force_ocr": false,
20
+ "disable_ocr": false,
21
+ "output_format": "markdown",
22
+ "preserve_source": false
23
+ },
24
+ "worker": null,
25
+ "claimed_at": null,
26
+ "pages": 7,
27
+ "chars": 38098,
28
+ "elapsed": 24.24267971899826,
29
+ "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743481/EFTA02743481.md",
30
+ "error": "",
31
+ "backend": "local",
32
+ "attempts": 1,
33
+ "warnings": []
34
+ },
35
+ "49f45cca217654cd1a349ca98272e9f005822c0b2ada4dc81dc941336a0026e5": {
36
+ "sha": "49f45cca217654cd1a349ca98272e9f005822c0b2ada4dc81dc941336a0026e5",
37
+ "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743488.pdf",
38
+ "name": "EFTA02743488.pdf",
39
+ "size": 102707,
40
+ "status": "done",
41
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
42
+ "engine": {
43
+ "marker_major": "2",
44
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
45
+ "mode": "balanced",
46
+ "use_llm": false,
47
+ "force_ocr": false,
48
+ "disable_ocr": false,
49
+ "output_format": "markdown",
50
+ "preserve_source": false
51
+ },
52
+ "worker": null,
53
+ "claimed_at": null,
54
+ "pages": 1,
55
+ "chars": 1520,
56
+ "elapsed": 6.39126113592647,
57
+ "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743488/EFTA02743488.md",
58
+ "error": "",
59
+ "backend": "local",
60
+ "attempts": 1,
61
+ "warnings": []
62
+ },
63
+ "b0a7679e5549efc3590d5795baecff4582df7172eef8db87e0f4674a13d1e9d4": {
64
+ "sha": "b0a7679e5549efc3590d5795baecff4582df7172eef8db87e0f4674a13d1e9d4",
65
+ "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743489.pdf",
66
+ "name": "EFTA02743489.pdf",
67
+ "size": 177483,
68
+ "status": "done",
69
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
70
+ "engine": {
71
+ "marker_major": "2",
72
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
73
+ "mode": "balanced",
74
+ "use_llm": false,
75
+ "force_ocr": false,
76
+ "disable_ocr": false,
77
+ "output_format": "markdown",
78
+ "preserve_source": false
79
+ },
80
+ "worker": null,
81
+ "claimed_at": null,
82
+ "pages": 2,
83
+ "chars": 2748,
84
+ "elapsed": 0.7174167149933055,
85
+ "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743489/EFTA02743489.md",
86
+ "error": "",
87
+ "backend": "local",
88
+ "attempts": 1,
89
+ "warnings": []
90
+ },
91
+ "8f4428a21857a50c6d5175552662196399896ae9ca767d71abeadfa08204996f": {
92
+ "sha": "8f4428a21857a50c6d5175552662196399896ae9ca767d71abeadfa08204996f",
93
+ "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743491.pdf",
94
+ "name": "EFTA02743491.pdf",
95
+ "size": 178352,
96
+ "status": "done",
97
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
98
+ "engine": {
99
+ "marker_major": "2",
100
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
101
+ "mode": "balanced",
102
+ "use_llm": false,
103
+ "force_ocr": false,
104
+ "disable_ocr": false,
105
+ "output_format": "markdown",
106
+ "preserve_source": false
107
+ },
108
+ "worker": null,
109
+ "claimed_at": null,
110
+ "pages": 3,
111
+ "chars": 1805,
112
+ "elapsed": 0.8320413110777736,
113
+ "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743491/EFTA02743491.md",
114
+ "error": "",
115
+ "backend": "local",
116
+ "attempts": 1,
117
+ "warnings": []
118
+ },
119
+ "16de7f9ed76f1c334c1bf136b6fc6edf1f60597bc4a8485b0e349b6fafcf7c05": {
120
+ "sha": "16de7f9ed76f1c334c1bf136b6fc6edf1f60597bc4a8485b0e349b6fafcf7c05",
121
+ "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743494.pdf",
122
+ "name": "EFTA02743494.pdf",
123
+ "size": 208033,
124
+ "status": "done",
125
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
126
+ "engine": {
127
+ "marker_major": "2",
128
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
129
+ "mode": "balanced",
130
+ "use_llm": false,
131
+ "force_ocr": false,
132
+ "disable_ocr": false,
133
+ "output_format": "markdown",
134
+ "preserve_source": false
135
+ },
136
+ "worker": null,
137
+ "claimed_at": null,
138
+ "pages": 2,
139
+ "chars": 2791,
140
+ "elapsed": 0.8835607829969376,
141
+ "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743494/EFTA02743494.md",
142
+ "error": "",
143
+ "backend": "local",
144
+ "attempts": 1,
145
+ "warnings": []
146
+ },
147
+ "035c4f34bba89b0d3178fa2b68be2dc03969208d6c3112cfe33289a73116e740": {
148
+ "sha": "035c4f34bba89b0d3178fa2b68be2dc03969208d6c3112cfe33289a73116e740",
149
+ "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743496.pdf",
150
+ "name": "EFTA02743496.pdf",
151
+ "size": 546754,
152
+ "status": "done",
153
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
154
+ "engine": {
155
+ "marker_major": "2",
156
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
157
+ "mode": "balanced",
158
+ "use_llm": false,
159
+ "force_ocr": false,
160
+ "disable_ocr": false,
161
+ "output_format": "markdown",
162
+ "preserve_source": false
163
+ },
164
+ "worker": null,
165
+ "claimed_at": null,
166
+ "pages": 7,
167
+ "chars": 7454,
168
+ "elapsed": 1.0835212499368936,
169
+ "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743496/EFTA02743496.md",
170
+ "error": "",
171
+ "backend": "local",
172
+ "attempts": 1,
173
+ "warnings": []
174
+ },
175
+ "5e39afd475f1b0ad8255ef86ef8c0d9f01966d2d14c3680604bed58642642b83": {
176
+ "sha": "5e39afd475f1b0ad8255ef86ef8c0d9f01966d2d14c3680604bed58642642b83",
177
+ "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743503.pdf",
178
+ "name": "EFTA02743503.pdf",
179
+ "size": 270868,
180
+ "status": "done",
181
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
182
+ "engine": {
183
+ "marker_major": "2",
184
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
185
+ "mode": "balanced",
186
+ "use_llm": false,
187
+ "force_ocr": false,
188
+ "disable_ocr": false,
189
+ "output_format": "markdown",
190
+ "preserve_source": false
191
+ },
192
+ "worker": null,
193
+ "claimed_at": null,
194
+ "pages": 3,
195
+ "chars": 3778,
196
+ "elapsed": 0.9686189730418846,
197
+ "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743503/EFTA02743503.md",
198
+ "error": "",
199
+ "backend": "local",
200
+ "attempts": 1,
201
+ "warnings": []
202
+ },
203
+ "74b675b94f35b83931b1f4c931ad1913ff94727d104e55c4f338281dd8a0c479": {
204
+ "sha": "74b675b94f35b83931b1f4c931ad1913ff94727d104e55c4f338281dd8a0c479",
205
+ "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743506.pdf",
206
+ "name": "EFTA02743506.pdf",
207
+ "size": 518621,
208
+ "status": "done",
209
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
210
+ "engine": {
211
+ "marker_major": "2",
212
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
213
+ "mode": "balanced",
214
+ "use_llm": false,
215
+ "force_ocr": false,
216
+ "disable_ocr": false,
217
+ "output_format": "markdown",
218
+ "preserve_source": false
219
+ },
220
+ "worker": null,
221
+ "claimed_at": null,
222
+ "pages": 6,
223
+ "chars": 5524,
224
+ "elapsed": 6.746428954065777,
225
+ "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743506/EFTA02743506.md",
226
+ "error": "",
227
+ "backend": "local",
228
+ "attempts": 1,
229
+ "warnings": []
230
+ },
231
+ "3143dc60b748f284823272cf26d6b76136e935d10169261ad8b662a2db502d0a": {
232
+ "sha": "3143dc60b748f284823272cf26d6b76136e935d10169261ad8b662a2db502d0a",
233
+ "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743512.pdf",
234
+ "name": "EFTA02743512.pdf",
235
+ "size": 492305,
236
+ "status": "done",
237
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
238
+ "engine": {
239
+ "marker_major": "2",
240
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
241
+ "mode": "balanced",
242
+ "use_llm": false,
243
+ "force_ocr": false,
244
+ "disable_ocr": false,
245
+ "output_format": "markdown",
246
+ "preserve_source": false
247
+ },
248
+ "worker": null,
249
+ "claimed_at": null,
250
+ "pages": 5,
251
+ "chars": 7745,
252
+ "elapsed": 1.1037586099701002,
253
+ "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743512/EFTA02743512.md",
254
+ "error": "",
255
+ "backend": "local",
256
+ "attempts": 1,
257
+ "warnings": []
258
+ },
259
+ "e78f14176dd5ce0e8ad25f4aad3ad2f94789d4bc5f08a7a162458c0f65580b6a": {
260
+ "sha": "e78f14176dd5ce0e8ad25f4aad3ad2f94789d4bc5f08a7a162458c0f65580b6a",
261
+ "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743517.pdf",
262
+ "name": "EFTA02743517.pdf",
263
+ "size": 131045,
264
+ "status": "done",
265
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
266
+ "engine": {
267
+ "marker_major": "2",
268
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
269
+ "mode": "balanced",
270
+ "use_llm": false,
271
+ "force_ocr": false,
272
+ "disable_ocr": false,
273
+ "output_format": "markdown",
274
+ "preserve_source": false
275
+ },
276
+ "worker": null,
277
+ "claimed_at": null,
278
+ "pages": 2,
279
+ "chars": 1712,
280
+ "elapsed": 0.8597448570653796,
281
+ "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743517/EFTA02743517.md",
282
+ "error": "",
283
+ "backend": "local",
284
+ "attempts": 1,
285
+ "warnings": []
286
+ },
287
+ "a05a2119087d1fcbfa8135bce83317c5ef8496535b6a347afc9f96cc385ccd86": {
288
+ "sha": "a05a2119087d1fcbfa8135bce83317c5ef8496535b6a347afc9f96cc385ccd86",
289
+ "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743519.pdf",
290
+ "name": "EFTA02743519.pdf",
291
+ "size": 120797,
292
+ "status": "done",
293
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
294
+ "engine": {
295
+ "marker_major": "2",
296
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
297
+ "mode": "balanced",
298
+ "use_llm": false,
299
+ "force_ocr": false,
300
+ "disable_ocr": false,
301
+ "output_format": "markdown",
302
+ "preserve_source": false
303
+ },
304
+ "worker": null,
305
+ "claimed_at": null,
306
+ "pages": 2,
307
+ "chars": 1533,
308
+ "elapsed": 1.376240203040652,
309
+ "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743519/EFTA02743519.md",
310
+ "error": "",
311
+ "backend": "local",
312
+ "attempts": 1,
313
+ "warnings": []
314
+ },
315
+ "3a805da2a9c2c8805606ed6bed53f1cd5646b975fb8aa4856dc1d9075e26dc54": {
316
+ "sha": "3a805da2a9c2c8805606ed6bed53f1cd5646b975fb8aa4856dc1d9075e26dc54",
317
+ "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743521.pdf",
318
+ "name": "EFTA02743521.pdf",
319
+ "size": 74765,
320
+ "status": "done",
321
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
322
+ "engine": {
323
+ "marker_major": "2",
324
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
325
+ "mode": "balanced",
326
+ "use_llm": false,
327
+ "force_ocr": false,
328
+ "disable_ocr": false,
329
+ "output_format": "markdown",
330
+ "preserve_source": false
331
+ },
332
+ "worker": null,
333
+ "claimed_at": null,
334
+ "pages": 1,
335
+ "chars": 992,
336
+ "elapsed": 0.8813987510511652,
337
+ "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-doe-v-epstein-80069/EFTA02743521/EFTA02743521.md",
338
+ "error": "",
339
+ "backend": "local",
340
+ "attempts": 1,
341
+ "warnings": []
342
+ }
343
+ }
344
+ }