MEMY-1805 marker2 court-redacted-v-indyke-10788 (salt 4090): 135/135

marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737217/EFTA02737217.md

@@ -0,0 +1,242 @@
+#### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
+
+x
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+Case No. 19 Civ. 10788
+
+### COMPLAINT -against- AND JURY DEMAND
+
+DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, as EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendants.
+
+x
+
+Plaintiff ==, by and through her attorneys, Cuti Hecker Wang LLP and Allred, Maroko & Goldberg, for her Complaint alleges as follows:
+
+# NATURE OF THE ACTION
+
+1. When Plaintiff was just seventeen years old, living on her own and working full-time to support herself, Jeffrey Epstein preyed open her, manipulated her to be completely dependent on him, and sexually abused her.
+
+2. Epstein was presented to Teala as someone who had learned about her challenging circumstances and had the resources and interest to assist her — including by helping her to attend college and study abroad to see the world. Teala was introduced to Epstein by her sister, but Teala was unaware that Epstein had been manipulating and sexually abusing her sister, as Epstein's total power and control over Teala's sister made it impossible for her to say anything about it.
+
+3. During their early interactions, Epstein led Teala to believe that he would help her achieve her dream of becoming a translator, and he arranged for Teala to study abroad in Spain. Teala gave up her job and her apartment in anticipation of this life-changing opportunity, leaving her completely dependent on Epstein and his continuing generosity.
+
+4. Epstein exploited this power over seventeen-year-old Teala to sexually abuse her repeatedly. Ultimately, he raped and sexually assaulted her frequently and in a variety of places and settings, including by trafficking Teala to his homes in New York, New Mexico, Florida, the Virgin Islands, and France. He treated her like an object for his sexual gratification.
+
+5. These assaults caused Teala to feel completely intimidated and fearful. She froze up and began to cry, able to think only about trying to survive.
+
+6. Epstein continued to exert total control over Teala's life for two more years, trafficking her around the country and the world and sexually abusing her on a frequent basis. During this time, Teala felt deep despair and isolation, and developed a severe and selfdestructive eating disorder. Still within his power and control, Teala confided in Epstein about her disorder, mistakenly believing that she could trust him. Rather than help her, Epstein cast her out within hours of her admission, sending her back to a place where she no longer had a home, a job or any resources or support.
+
+7. Epstein's abuse destroyed life. She sank into alcoholism and other self-harm, unable to trust others but not understanding why.
+
+8. At the same time, like so many childhood sex abuse victims, she did not comprehend how it had undone her or her life, or how it impacted her.
+
+9. Now a working mother of three, is still just beginning to understand the depth of the injuries from the sexual assaults that Epstein inflicted on her beginning when she was seventeen. She feels the toll of Epstein's abuse every day. She feels dysfunctional, on-edge, overwhelmed, and like she is on the verge of a psychological breakdown. She has difficulty sleeping and often has flashbacks to Epstein's abuse.
+
+10. Epstein died in August 2019, before or the countless other girls he preyed upon could obtain a modicum of justice.
+
+I I. brings this action seeking, at last, some remedy for the egregious abuse that Epstein inflicted when she was a child.
+
+# PARTIES
+
+12. Plaintiff is an individual who resides in Arizona.
+
+13. Defendants Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn are the Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (the "Estate"). As Executors of the Estate, Defendants are liable for the acts and omissions of Epstein and his agents. For purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1332, Defendants Indyke and Kahn are deemed to be citizens of the United States Virgin Islands, where Epstein was domiciled at the time of his death.
+
+# JURISDICTION AND VENUE
+
+14. This Court has subject-matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332 because this case is between citizens of different states and the amount in controversy exceeds \$75,000.
+
+15. Venue is proper in this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 139I(bX2) because a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred in this District.
+
+16. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendants. As Executors of the Estate, Defendants Indyke and Kahn are subject to personal jurisdiction in this Court because Epstein was subject to personal jurisdiction at the time of his death.
+
+17. This Court had both specific and general personal jurisdiction over Epstein at the time of his death.
+
+18. Epstein resided in New York State a substantial portion of the time during the time period at issue in this lawsuit, and through the time of his death.
+
+19. Epstein resided in the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York County at the time of his death.
+
+20. Epstein conducted substantial business operations in New York.
+
+21. Epstein owned and/or controlled numerous companies with principal places of business in New York.
+
+22. Epstein owned substantial real property assets in New York, including the townhouse located at 9 East 7Ist Street in Manhattan, which is valued at \$55 million or more.
+
+23. New York was the epicenter of Epstein's criminal sex-trafficking enterprise. For years, Epstein and his agents took actions in New York in order to arrange for minor girls to be trafficked to his homes throughout the country in order to perform sexual acts for him. Epstein's trafficking and abuse of was part of that New York-based criminal enterprise.
+
+24. From his Manhattan townhouse, Epstein directed a vast network of agents in recruiting minor girls to be brought to him for his sexual use.
+
+25. Epstein sexually abused many minor girls, including in his Manhattan townhouse.
+
+26. On many occasions, Epstein and his agents made phone calls from New York to schedule appointments for minor girls to come to Epstein's residences outside of New York in order to perform commercial sexual acts for Epstein.
+
+27. Upon information and belief, Epstein and/or his agents were present in New York when they took various actions to facilitate the trafficking of for the purpose of performing sexual acts for Epstein.
+
+# JURY DEMAND
+
+28. Plaintiff hereby demands a trial by jury on all of her claims in this action.
+
+## FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
+
+29. When Plaintiff was seventeen years old, Jeffrey Epstein preyed upon her, manipulating her to be completely dependent on him and then sexually assaulting and raping her on numerous occasions. Epstein continued this pattern of manipulation and frequent sexual assault for years, leaving with deep emotional wounds that she is still just beginning to grapple with.
+
+30. By age seventeen, Teala had already lived through tremendously challenging circumstances. At eleven years old, she was homeless for a year, staying with various friends and seeing her mother only about once a week. At fifteen, Teala began working in order to support herself. At sixteen, Teala's living situation was again unstable, and she moved to Los Angeles to live with her older sister.
+
+31. Teala initially tried to go to school in Los Angeles, but was unable to continue due to the need to work full-time to support herself. Teals lived with her sister and worked at a hair salon, eventually getting her GED. By the time Teala met Epstein, she had already been living on her own and working full-time for a year-and-a-half.
+
+32. Teala's sister — who is five years older than her — had previously met Epstein and traveled with him. Teala's sister described Epstein to her as a generous wealthy person, and reported that he often helped make it possible for people to attend college. Teala's sister reported that Epstein had heard Teala's story and that he wanted to help.
+
+33. Unbeknownst to Teals, Epstein had been manipulating and sexually abusing her sister. Teals had no idea that her sister had been involved in any type of sexual interactions with Epstein. Epstein's power and control of Teala's sister made it impossible for her to say anything.
+
+34. Teala met Epstein for the first time in 2002, when she was seventeen years old. Epstein was visiting Los Angeles, and Teala drove with her sister to meet him at the Hotel Bel-Air.
+
+35. During that first meeting, Epstein lay on a bed in his spacious hotel suite, fully clothed. He asked Teala's sister to massage his feet, then encouraged Teala to join her. Afterwards, Epstein took them shopping, and insisted on buying several items for Teala.
+
+36. After that meeting, Epstein kept in touch with Teala through frequent phone calls. Epstein veered the conversation toward Teala's career goals and how Epstein could help her achieve them. He purported to want to help her and guide her to a better life.
+
+37. Epstein offered to send Teala to school to learn hairdressing, but Teala made clear that this was not what she wanted to do in the long term. Teala explained that she had a passion for languages and for people, and that her dream was to be a translator.
+
+38. Epstein claimed that he wanted to help Teala study to become a translator. He suggested that he would pay for Teala to study in Spain for a semester. Soon after, Epstein helped her to obtain a letter of recommendation from her high school counselor and helped her get accepted to study at the University of Madrid.
+
+39. Teala was over the moon, feeling her dreams were coming true. Epstein made sure she felt that it was all his doing.
+
+40. Teala prepared for this exciting opportunity to study abroad and pursue her dream career. She gave notice at her hairdressing job and gave up her apartment in Los Angeles, preparing to move to Spain.
+
+41. Before Teala left for her school program, however, Epstein began what would become a long pattern of using her as his sexual object.
+
+42. In approximately the summer of 2002, Epstein flew Teala and her sister to his ranch in New Mexico. Teala felt no reason to be wary of Epstein. He had been kind in their first meeting and had acted with generosity towards her.
+
+43. When Teala got to Epstein's ranch, Epstein's close associates Ghislaine Maxwell and were there. Maxwell asked Teala questions about herself and took her horseback riding. invited Teals to go swimming.
+
+44. After Teala swam, Epstein asked her to go into a massage room along with began massaging Epstein, and Teala innocently joined in. as she had when her sister massaged Epstein's feet the first time.
+
+45. At that point, Epstein began fondling and took off shirt. Teala became very uncomfortable, as the massage had quickly and unexpectedly turned into a sexual encounter. Epstein reached inside Teala's bathing suit and fondled her genitals. Teals began crying, but Epstein continued to grope her as he masturbated to completion.
+
+46. Teals felt extremely vulnerable. Epstein had arranged the circumstances to ensure that Teala was completely at his mercy. Teala had given up her job and her apartment in order to travel to Spain at Epstein's expense. If Epstein decided to rethink his generosity at any point, Teala would have had nothing, and would have been left homeless and jobless once again, after being brought so close to her dream. Even though Epstein had preyed upon her and sexually assaulted her, Teala understood she had no choice but to submit to him. His power over her was all-encompassing.
+
+47. Epstein viciously exploited this power dynamic. In the summer and fall of 2002, he flew seventeen-year-old Teala to his homes in New York, Florida, and the U.S. Virgin Islands, sexually assaulting her in each of those locations.
+
+48. In or around December 2002, Epstein flew Teala to stay at his townhouse
+
+located at 9 East 71st Street in Manhattan. While they were in the dining room of the townhouse, Epstein without warning stuck his hand down Teala's pants and fondled her genitals. It was as if she were his toy.
+
+49. In or around that same month, at Epstein's home in Florida, Epstein crept into Teala's bedroom while she was sleeping and raped her.
+
+50. Also around that same month, at the private island Epstein owned in the Virgin Islands, Epstein ordered Teala to massage him, then proceeded to sexually assault her in the massage room.
+
+51. Teala finally traveled to Spain to study in or around the end of 2002.
+
+52. In early 2003, when Teala was still seventeen years old, Epstein flew her from Madrid to Paris. At his home in Paris, Epstein again crept into Teala's bedroom while she slept and raped her.
+
+53. When Epstein inflicted these sexual assaults on Teala, she felt completely intimidated and fearful. All she could think about was trying to survive. Her body froze up, and she began crying.
+
+54. After Teala's semester in Madrid, she had no home and no job. Instead, Epstein brought her to live a nomadic lifestyle in his close orbit. Teala traveled around the country with Epstein and his entourage, which generally included Maxwell, =, and others. Virtually every few days, Epstein would bring Teala to a different home of his, including his Manhattan townhouse and throughout the country, where he continued to sexually assault her on a frequent basis. Epstein regularly used his private planes to traffic Teala into various locations for his sexual abuse of her.
+
+55. Epstein had power over every aspect of Teala's life, and he had groomed Teala to be completely dependent on him and completely submissive to him. Epstein treated
+
+Teala as a sexual object, using her body for his sexual gratification frequently and at his whim.
+
+56. Eventually, by approximately 2004, Epstein arranged for Teala to live in an apartment at 301 East 66th Street in Manhattan, just blocks from his townhouse, when she was in New York.
+
+57. This pattern - of Epstein exercising total control over Teala's life and using her as a sexual object whenever he desired — continued throughout 2003 and 2004. Epstein arranged for Teala to study abroad two more times, apparently when he grew bored with having her around. Each time, Teala lived in this nomadic orbit with Epstein both before and after traveling to attend school.
+
+58. Epstein also tried to introduce Teala to his "friends" and essentially offer her as a sexual object to them. In one instance, Epstein had Teala spend time with a well-known Hollywood producer, who then demanded and attempted to engage in abusive sexual behavior. Teala barely escaped.
+
+59. By 2004, Teala felt deep despair and isolation. There was no one she could talk to about what Epstein was doing to her. Instead, Epstein had ensured that she thought he was the only person in her life whom she could trust.
+
+60. Teala developed a severe eating disorder, for the first time, in or around 2004. After she had struggled with the disorder for six months or a year, it became too much to bear. She confided in Epstein about the eating disorder, still manipulated into thinking he was someone she could trust.
+
+61. Instead, from the moment Epstein learned of Teala's self-destructive behavior, he immediately cast her out. Literally within hours of Teala anxiously confessing to Epstein that she did not know why, but had a compulsive need to binge and purge, he threw her out. He instructed her to pack up her belongings and arranged for her to be flown to Arizona.
+
+62. But there was nothing left for her in Arizona. She still had no idea what had happened to her and felt it was all her fault.
+
+63. Epstein's abuse destroyed Teala's life. After being cast out by him after two years of a lavish, if abusive, lifestyle, she sank into alcoholism and other self-harm, unable to trust others but not understanding why.
+
+64. is now a working mother raising three children. She is still struggling to put her life back together.
+
+65. is still in the nascent stages of understanding the deep and lasting injuries that Epstein's pattern of abuse has caused her, but she feels the effects every day. She feels dysfunctional, on-edge, and constantly overwhelmed. She has difficulty sleeping. She often has flashbacks to Epstein's sexual assaults. She feels like she is on the verge of a psychological breakdown.
+
+66. This action is timely under the law of each jurisdiction whose law might be determined to govern claims or aspects thereof, including without limitation New York, New Mexico, Florida, and the Virgin Islands.
+
+67. still has not disclosed her abuse to a licensed medical or mental health care provider in the context of receiving health care from the provider.
+
+68. is still just beginning to process and understand the full extent of the injuries that Epstein's abuse had caused her and the connection between Epstein's abuse and the emotional and psychological injuries she had experienced.
+
+69. This action is timely under New York law because it falls within New York CPLR 2I4-g and is brought during the one-year time period set forth in that section. The claims brought herein allege intentional and negligent acts and/or omissions for physical, psychological, and other injury suffered as a result of conduct that would constitute sexual
+
+offenses as defined in Article 130 of the New York Penal Law, and such acts and/or omissions were committed against when she was less than eighteen years of age.
+
+70. Epstein's conduct constitutes "childhood sexual abuse" within the meaning of New Mexico Stat. § 37-1-30 and "abuse" within the meaning of Florida Stat. § 95.11(7).
+
+## FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION (Battery)
+
+71. Plaintiff hereby incorporates each of the foregoing paragraphs as if fully set forth herein.
+
+72. In committing the acts described above, Epstein intentionally subjected Plaintiff to bodily contact that was offensive in nature.
+
+73. Epstein intentionally touched Plaintiff in a rude, insolent, or angry manner.
+
+74. As a result of Epstein's actions, Plaintiff suffered damages in an amount to be determined at trial.
+
+## SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION (Assault)
+
+75. Plaintiff hereby incorporates each of the foregoing paragraphs as if fully set forth herein.
+
+76. In committing the acts described above, Epstein engaged in physical conduct that placed Plaintiff in imminent apprehension that he would harm her.
+
+77. As a result of Epstein's actions, Plaintiff suffered damages in an amount to be determined at trial.
+
+#### THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION (Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress)
+
+78. Plaintiff hereby incorporates each of the foregoing paragraphs as if fully set forth herein.
+
+79. In committing the acts described above, Epstein engaged in extreme and outrageous conduct.
+
+80. In doing so, Epstein acted with the intent to cause and/or disregard of a substantial likelihood of causing Plaintiff to suffer severe emotional distress.
+
+81. As a direct result of Epstein's actions, Plaintiff suffered severe emotional distress.
+
+82. As a result of Epstein's actions, Plaintiff suffered damages in an amount to be determined at trial.
+
+WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that judgment be entered against Defendants as follows:
+
+- a. Awarding compensatory damages for all physical injuries, emotional distress, psychological harm, anxiety, humiliation, physical and emotional pain and suffering, family and social disruption, and other harm, in an amount to be determined at trial;
+- b. Awarding punitive damages in an amount to be determined at trial;
+- c. Awarding attorneys' fees and costs pursuant to any applicable statute or law;
+- d. Awarding pre- and post-judgment interest on all such damages, fees and/or costs;
+- e. Attaching all of Defendants' real property and other assets located in the State of New York pursuant to New York CPLR 6201 et seq. and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 64; and
+- 1. Awarding such other and further relief as this Court may deem just and proper.
+
+Dated: New York, New York November 21, 2019
+
+CUT! HECKER WANG LLP
+
+By: /s/ Mariann Meier Wang
+
+Mariann Meier Wang
+
+Daniel Mullkoff
+
+305 Broadway, Suite 607
+
+New York, New York 10007
+
+(212) 620-2603
+
+mwang@chwIlp.com
+
+ALLRED, MAROKO & GOLDBERG
+
+Gloria Allred
+
+305 Broadway, Suite 607
+
+New York, New York 10007
+
+(212) 202-2966
+
+Attorneys for Plaintiff

marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737217/EFTA02737217.metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,729 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737217.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 13,
+  "chars": 20200,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.89,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            68.544,
+            71.17889404296875
+          ],
+          [
+            282.1064147949219,
+            71.17889404296875
+          ],
+          [
+            282.1064147949219,
+            98.68353271484375
+          ],
+          [
+            68.544,
+            98.68353271484375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "COMPLAINT \n-against- AND JURY DEMAND",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            143.5,
+            163.62
+          ],
+          [
+            481.60491943359375,
+            163.62
+          ],
+          [
+            481.60491943359375,
+            191.68353271484375
+          ],
+          [
+            143.5,
+            191.68353271484375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "NATURE OF THE ACTION",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            227.66400000000002,
+            349.92
+          ],
+          [
+            384.78680419921875,
+            349.92
+          ],
+          [
+            384.78680419921875,
+            364.93353271484375
+          ],
+          [
+            227.66400000000002,
+            364.93353271484375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "PARTIES",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            277.236,
+            123.93
+          ],
+          [
+            335.94378662109375,
+            123.93
+          ],
+          [
+            335.94378662109375,
+            138.7330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            277.236,
+            138.7330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "JURISDICTION AND VENUE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            221.54399999999998,
+            310.23
+          ],
+          [
+            389.5322570800781,
+            310.23
+          ],
+          [
+            389.5322570800781,
+            325.10302734375
+          ],
+          [
+            221.54399999999998,
+            325.10302734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "JURY DEMAND",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            258.264,
+            655.29
+          ],
+          [
+            354.5192565917969,
+            655.29
+          ],
+          [
+            354.5192565917969,
+            670.4830169677734
+          ],
+          [
+            258.264,
+            670.4830169677734
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            229.5,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            384.37506103515625,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            384.37506103515625,
+            85.56353759765625
+          ],
+          [
+            229.5,
+            85.56353759765625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION \n(Battery)",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 10,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            227.66400000000002,
+            203.31
+          ],
+          [
+            383.56695556640625,
+            203.31
+          ],
+          [
+            383.56695556640625,
+            232.10302734375
+          ],
+          [
+            227.66400000000002,
+            232.10302734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION \n(Assault)",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 10,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            219.70799999999997,
+            455.22
+          ],
+          [
+            391.0873718261719,
+            455.22
+          ],
+          [
+            391.0873718261719,
+            484.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            219.70799999999997,
+            484.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION \n(Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress)",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 11,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            189.108,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            423.3904724121094,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            423.3904724121094,
+            98.9830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            189.108,
+            98.9830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            59
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            30
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            52
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            54
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 4,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 5,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 6,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 7,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 8,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            54
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 9,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 10,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            53
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            9
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 11,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            55
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 12,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            37
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            19
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            15
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737217"
+  }
+}

marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737230/EFTA02737230.md

@@ -0,0 +1,128 @@
+The JS-44 civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replace nor supplement the filing and service of pleadings or other papers as required by law, except as provided by local rules of court. This form, approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September 1974, is required for use of the Clerk of Court for the purpose of initiating the civil docket sheet.
+
+PLAINTIFFS
+
+![](_page_0_Picture_35.jpeg)
+
+DEFENDANTS
+
+DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN,  
+as EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF JEFFREY E.
+
+EDGETIN-  
+ATTORNEYS (IF KNOWN)
+
+ATTORNEYS (FIRM NAME, ADDRESS, AND TELEPHONE NUMBER)
+
+Bennet J. Moskowitz, Troutman Sanders LLP  
+875 Third Avenue
+
+New York, NY 10002 (for Defendants Indyke and Kahn)
+
+CAUSE OF ACTION (CITE THE U.S. CIVIL STATUTE UNDER WHICH YOU ARE FILING AND WRITE A BRIEF STATEMENT OF CAUSE)  
+(DO NOT CITE JURISDICTIONAL STATUTES UNLESS DIVERSITY)
+
+28 USC 1332
+
+Has this action, case, or proceeding, or one essentially the same been previously filed in SDNY at any time? No  Yes  Judge Previously Assigned
+
+If yes, was this case Vol.  Invol.  Dismissed. No  Yes  If yes, give date \_\_\_\_\_ & Case No. \_\_\_\_\_
+
+IS THIS AN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CASE? No  Yes 
+
+(PLACE AN [x] IN ONE BOX ONLY) NATURE OF SUIT
+
+| CONTRACT                | PERSONAL INJURY            | PERSONAL INJURY          | FORFEITURE/PENALTY                              | BANKRUPTCY                       | OTHER STATUTES               |
+|-------------------------|----------------------------|--------------------------|-------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------|------------------------------|
+| [ ] 110 INSURANCE       | [ ] 310 AIRPLANE           | [ ] 367 HEALTHCARE/      | [ ] 625 DRUG RELATED                            | [ ] 422 APPEAL                   | [ ] 375 FALSE CLAIMS         |
+| [ ] 120 MARINE          | [ ] 315 AIRPLANE PRODUCT   | PHARMACEUTICAL PERSONAL  | [ ] 625 DRUG RELATED                            | [ ] 422 APPEAL                   | [ ] 375 QUI TAM              |
+| [ ] 130 ACT             | [ ] 315 AIRPLANE PRODUCT   | INJURY/PRODUCT LIABILITY | SEIZURE OF PROPERTY                             | [ ] 423 WITHDRAWAL               | [ ] 400 STATE                |
+| [ ] 140 NEGOTIABLE      | [ ] 320 ASSAULT, LIBEL &   | LIABILITY                | 21 USC 681                                      | [ ] 423 WITHDRAWAL               | [ ] 400 STATE                |
+| [ ] 150 INSTRUMENT      | [ ] 330 FEDERAL            | PRODUCT LIABILITY        | [ ] 690 OTHER                                   | [ ] 430 BANKS & BANKING          | [ ] 410 ANTITRUST            |
+| [ ] 150 RECOVERY OF     | [ ] 330 FEDERAL            | LIABILITY                | [ ] 690 OTHER                                   | [ ] 450 COMMERCE                 | [ ] 460 DEPORTATION          |
+| [ ] 151 ENFORCEMENT     | [ ] 340 MARINE             | PERSONAL PROPERTY        | [ ] 820 COPYRIGHTS                              | [ ] 470 RACKETEER INFLU-         | [ ] 480 CONSUMER CREDIT      |
+| [ ] 152 DEFAULTED       | [ ] 345 MARINE PRODUCT     | [ ] 370 OTHER FRAUD      | [ ] 830 PATENT                                  | [ ] 430 BANKS & BANKING          | [ ] 470 RACKETEER INFLU-     |
+| [ ] 153 STUDENT LOANS   | [ ] 355 MOTOR VEHICLE      | [ ] 371 TRUTH IN LENDING | [ ] 835 PATENT-ABBREVIATED NEW DRUG APPLICATION | [ ] 830 PATENT                   | [ ] 480 CONSUMER CREDIT      |
+| [ ] 153 (EXCL VETERANS) | [ ] 360 OTHER PERSONAL     | [ ] 370 OTHER FRAUD      | [ ] 840 TRADEMARK                               | [ ] 850 SECURITIES/              | [ ] 480 CABLE/SATELLITE TV   |
+| [ ] 163 RECOVERY OF     | [ ] 362 PERSONAL INJURY -  | [ ] 380 OTHER PERSONAL   | [ ] 851 FAMILY MEDICAL                          | [ ] 865 RSI (405(g))             | [ ] 850 SECURITIES/          |
+| [ ] 160 STOCKHOLDERS    | [ ] 362 PERSONAL INJURY -  | [ ] 385 PROPERTY DAMAGE  | [ ] 710 FAIR LABOR                              | [ ] 865 RSI (405(g))             | [ ] 850 SECURITIES/          |
+| [ ] 190 SUITS           | [ ] 355 MOTOR VEHICLE      | PRODUCT LIABILITY        | [ ] 720 LABOR/MGMT                              | [ ] 863 DIWC/DIWW (405(g))       | [ ] 850 SECURITIES/          |
+| [ ] 190 OTHER           | [ ] 365 MOTOR VEHICLE      | PRISONER PETITIONS       | [ ] 740 RAILWAY LABOR ACT                       | [ ] 864 SSID TITLE XVI           | [ ] 890 OTHER STATUTORY      |
+| [ ] 195 CONTRACT        | [ ] 362 PERSONAL INJURY -  | [ ] 510 MOTIONS TO       | [ ] 750 RAILWAY LABOR ACT                       | [ ] 865 RSI (405(g))             | [ ] 890 AGRICULTURAL ACTS    |
+| [ ] 195 CONTRACT        | [ ] 362 PERSONAL INJURY -  | [ ] 530 HABEAS CORPUS    | [ ] 751 FAMILY MEDICAL                          | [ ] 870 TAXES (U.S. Plaintiff or | [ ] 893 ENVIRONMENTAL        |
+| [ ] 196 FRANCHISE       | [ ] 362 PERSONAL INJURY -  | [ ] 535 DEATH PENALTY    | [ ] 791 EMPL RET INC                            | [ ] 871 IRS-THIRD PARTY          | [ ] 893 FREEDOM OF           |
+| [ ] 196 FRANCHISE       | [ ] 362 PERSONAL INJURY -  | [ ] 540 MANDAMUS & OTHER | [ ] 791 EMPL RET INC                            | [ ] 871 IRS-THIRD PARTY          | [ ] 893 ARBITRATION          |
+| [ ] 210 LAND            | [ ] 440 OTHER CIVIL RIGHTS | [ ] 550 CIVIL RIGHTS     | [ ] 462 NATURALIZATION                          | [ ] 871 IRS-THIRD PARTY          | [ ] 893 ADMINISTRATIVE       |
+| [ ] 220 CONDEMNATION    | [ ] 442 EMPLOYMENT         | [ ] 550 CIVIL RIGHTS     | [ ] 462 NATURALIZATION                          | [ ] 871 IRS-THIRD PARTY          | [ ] 895 FREEDOM OF           |
+| [ ] 230 FORECLOSURE     | [ ] 443 HOUSING/           | [ ] 555 PRISON CONDITION | [ ] 465 OTHER IMMIGRATION                       | [ ] 871 IRS-THIRD PARTY          | [ ] 950 CONSTITUTIONALITY OF |
+| [ ] 230 RENT LEASE &    | [ ] 445 AMERICANS WITH     | [ ] 560 CIVIL DETAINEE   | [ ] 465 OTHER IMMIGRATION                       | [ ] 970 CONSTITUTIONALITY OF     | [ ] 950 CONSTITUTIONALITY OF |
+| [ ] 240 EJECTMENT       | [ ] 446 AMERICANS WITH     | [ ] 560 CIVIL DETAINEE   | [ ] 465 OTHER IMMIGRATION                       | [ ] 970 CONSTITUTIONALITY OF     | [ ] 950 CONSTITUTIONALITY OF |
+| [ ] 245 TORTS TO LAND   | [ ] 446 AMERICANS WITH     | [ ] 560 CIVIL DETAINEE   | [ ] 465 OTHER IMMIGRATION                       | [ ] 970 CONSTITUTIONALITY OF     | [ ] 950 CONSTITUTIONALITY OF |
+| [ ] 245 TORT PRODUCT    | [ ] 446 AMERICANS WITH     | [ ] 560 CIVIL DETAINEE   | [ ] 465 OTHER IMMIGRATION                       | [ ] 970 CONSTITUTIONALITY OF     | [ ] 950 CONSTITUTIONALITY OF |
+| [ ] 245 LIABILITY       | [ ] 446 AMERICANS WITH     | [ ] 560 CIVIL DETAINEE   | [ ] 465 OTHER IMMIGRATION                       | [ ] 970 CONSTITUTIONALITY OF     | [ ] 950 CONSTITUTIONALITY OF |
+| [ ] 290 ALL OTHER       | [ ] 448 EDUCATION          | [ ] 448 EDUCATION        | [ ] 468 EDUCATION                               | [ ] 970 CONSTITUTIONALITY OF     | [ ] 950 CONSTITUTIONALITY OF |
+| [ ] 290 REAL PROPERTY   | [ ] 448 EDUCATION          | [ ] 448 EDUCATION        | [ ] 468 EDUCATION                               | [ ] 970 CONSTITUTIONALITY OF     | [ ] 950 CONSTITUTIONALITY OF |
+
+Check if demanded in complaint:
+
+ CHECK IF THIS IS A CLASS ACTION  
+UNDER F.R.C.P. 23
+
+DO YOU CLAIM THIS CASE IS RELATED TO A CIVIL CASE NOW PENDING IN S.D.N.Y.  
+AS DEFINED BY LOCAL RULE FOR DIVISION OF BUSINESS 13?  
+IF SO, STATE:
+
+ 1 Original Proceeding  2 Removed from State Court  3 Remained from Appellate Court  4 Reinstated or Reopened  5 Transferred from (Specify District)  6 Multidistrict Litigation (Transferred)  7 Appeal to District Judge from Magistrate Judge
+
+ a. all parties represented
+
+ b. At least one party is pro se.
+
+ 8 Multidistrict Litigation (Direct File)
+
+## (PLACE AN x IN ONE BOX ONLY) BASIS OF JURISDICTION
+
+O 1 U.S. PLAINTIFF O 2 U.S. DEFENDANT 0 3 FEDERAL QUESTION 04 DIVERSITY (U.S. NOT A PARTY)
+
+IF DIVERSITY, INDICATE CITIZENSHIP BELOW.
+
+## CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES (FOR DIVERSITY CASES ONLY)
+
+(Place an po in one box for Plaintiff and one box for Defendant)
+
+|                          | PTF  | DEF   |                                 | PTF DEF     |                                  |       |     |
+|--------------------------|------|-------|---------------------------------|-------------|----------------------------------|-------|-----|
+| CITIZEN OF THIS STATE    | [ I  | [ II  | CITIZEN OR SUBJECT OF A         | (13(13      |                                  |       |     |
+| CITIZEN OF ANOTHER STATE | bg 2 | (34 2 | INCORPORATED or PRINCIPAL PLACE | [ ] 4 [ 3 4 | FOREIGN NATION                   |       |     |
+|                          |      |       |                                 |             |                                  | PTF   | DEF |
+|                          |      |       |                                 |             | INCORPORATED and PRINCIPAL PLACE | [ ] 5 | ( 5 |
+
+PLAINTIFFS) ADDRESS(ES) AND COUNTY(IES)
+
+Plaintiff is a resident of Arizona Go Cuti Hecker Wang LLP, 305 Broadway, Suite 607, New York, NY 10007.
+
+DEFENDANT(S) ADDRESS(ES) AND COUNTY(IES)
+
+Defendants Indyke and Kahn are residents of the U.S. Virgin Islands.
+
+DEFENDANT(S) ADDRESS UNKNOWN
+
+REPRESENTATION IS HEREBY MADE THAT, AT THIS TIME, I HAVE BEEN UNABLE, WITH REASONABLE DILIGENCE, TO ASCERTAIN THE RESIDENCE ADDRESSES OF THE FOLLOWING DEFENDANTS:
+
+Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn are sued as executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein. Per 28 USC 1332, Defendants are deemed citizens of the U.S. Virgin Islands, the domicile of decedent Epstein. Defendants' residential addresses are unknown to Plaintiff. Defendants' counsel is listed above.
+
+## COURTHOUSE ASSIGNMENT
+
+I hereby certify that this case should be assigned to the courthouse indicated below pursuant to Local Rule for Division of Business 18, 20 or 21.
+
+Check one: THIS ACTION SHOULD BE ASSIGNED TO: 0 PLAINS El MANHATTAN
+
+DATE 11/21/2019 SIGNATURE OF ATTORNEY OF RECO
+
+RECEIPT #
+
+Magistrate Judge is to be designated by the Clerk of the Court.
+
+ADMITTED TO PRACTICE IN THIS DISTRICT
+
+[ ] NO (i YES (DATE ADMITTED Mo.09 Yr. 1997 ) Attorney Bar Code M MW7417

marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737230/EFTA02737230.metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,203 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737230.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 2,
+  "chars": 10253,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 61.06,
+  "image_assets": [
+    "_page_0_Picture_35.jpeg"
+  ],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "CIVIL COVER SHEET",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            256.428,
+            24.299999999999997
+          ],
+          [
+            359.24399999999997,
+            24.299999999999997
+          ],
+          [
+            359.24399999999997,
+            35.64
+          ],
+          [
+            256.428,
+            35.64
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "(PLACE AN x IN ONE BOX ONLY) BASIS OF JURISDICTION",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            31.270000457763672,
+            117.44999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            378.916259765625,
+            117.44999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            378.916259765625,
+            129.36590576171875
+          ],
+          [
+            31.270000457763672,
+            129.36590576171875
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES (FOR DIVERSITY CASES ONLY)",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            141.984,
+            162.0
+          ],
+          [
+            480.55828857421875,
+            162.0
+          ],
+          [
+            480.55828857421875,
+            174.14999999999998
+          ],
+          [
+            141.984,
+            174.14999999999998
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "COURTHOUSE ASSIGNMENT",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            251.53199999999998,
+            547.5600000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            382.16888427734375,
+            547.5600000000001
+          ],
+          [
+            382.16888427734375,
+            559.8659210205078
+          ],
+          [
+            251.53199999999998,
+            559.8659210205078
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            48
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "Table",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "Picture",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            134
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            62
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            23
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Form",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Table",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737230"
+  }
+}

marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737232/EFTA02737232.md

@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
+
+for the
+
+Southern District of New York
+
+Plaintiffs)
+
+v.
+
+DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, as EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant(s)
+
+Civil Action No. 19 Civ. 10788
+
+## SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION
+
+To: (Defendant's name and address) Darren K. Indyke do Bennet J. Moskowitz, attorney Troutman Sanders LLP 875 Third Avenue New York, NY 10002
+
+A lawsuit has been filed against you.
+
+Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 (aX2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiffs attorney, whose name and address are: Mariann Meier Wang
+
+Cuti Hecker Wang LLP 305 Broadway, Suite 607 New York, New York 10007
+
+If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. You also must file your answer or motion with the court.
+
+Date:
+
+CLERK OF COURT
+
+Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk
+
+Civil Action No. 19 Civ. 10788
+
+## PROOF OF SERVICE
+
+(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (1))
+
+This summons for (name of individual and title, if any) was received by me on (date)
+
+O I personally served the summons on the individual at (place) on (date) ; or
+
+O I left the summons at the individual's residence or usual place of abode with (name) , a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there, on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual's last known address; or
+
+❑ I served the summons on (name of individual) designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization) on (date) or , who is
+
+O I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or
+
+O Other (specify):
+
+My fees are \$ for travel and \$ for services, for a total of \$ 0.00
+
+I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.
+
+Date: Server's signature
+
+Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:
+
+Printed name and title
+
+Server's address

marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737232/EFTA02737232.metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,170 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737232.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 2,
+  "chars": 2270,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.03,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            169.524,
+            60.75
+          ],
+          [
+            443.8427429199219,
+            60.75
+          ],
+          [
+            443.8427429199219,
+            83.17822265625
+          ],
+          [
+            169.524,
+            83.17822265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            219.70799999999997,
+            294.03
+          ],
+          [
+            391.9696350097656,
+            294.03
+          ],
+          [
+            391.9696350097656,
+            308.8305969238281
+          ],
+          [
+            219.70799999999997,
+            308.8305969238281
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "PROOF OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            248.47200000000004,
+            87.48
+          ],
+          [
+            362.36480712890625,
+            87.48
+          ],
+          [
+            362.36480712890625,
+            100.97406005859375
+          ],
+          [
+            248.47200000000004,
+            100.97406005859375
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            68
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            33
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            17
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            73
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            30
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            17
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737232"
+  }
+}

marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737234/EFTA02737234.md

@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
+
+for the
+
+Southern District of New York
+
+Plaintiffs)
+
+v.
+
+DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, as EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant(s)
+
+Civil Action No. 19 Civ. 10788
+
+## SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION
+
+To: (Defendant's name and address) Richard D. Kahn do Bennet J. Moskowitz, attorney Troutman Sanders LLP 875 Third Avenue New York, NY 10002
+
+A lawsuit has been filed against you.
+
+Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 (aX2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiffs attorney, whose name and address are: Mariann Meier Wang
+
+Cuti Hecker Wang LLP 305 Broadway, Suite 607 New York, New York 10007
+
+If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. You also must file your answer or motion with the court.
+
+Date:
+
+CLERK OF COURT
+
+Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk
+
+Civil Action No. 19 Civ. 10788
+
+## PROOF OF SERVICE
+
+(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (1))
+
+This summons for (name of individual and title. if any) was received by me on (date)
+
+O I personally served the summons on the individual at (place) on (date) ; or
+
+O I left the summons at the individual's residence or usual place of abode with (name) , a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there, on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual's last known address; or
+
+O I served the summons on (name of individual) designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization) on (date) or , who is
+
+O I returned the summons unexecuted because or
+
+O Other ( spec)fr):
+
+My fees are \$ for travel and \$ for services, for a total of \$ 0.00
+
+I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.
+
+Date: Server's signature
+
+Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:
+
+Printed name and title
+
+Server's address

marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737234/EFTA02737234.metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,170 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737234.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 2,
+  "chars": 2268,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.04,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            170.13600000000002,
+            60.75
+          ],
+          [
+            443.8427429199219,
+            60.75
+          ],
+          [
+            443.8427429199219,
+            83.17822265625
+          ],
+          [
+            170.13600000000002,
+            83.17822265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            220.32,
+            294.03
+          ],
+          [
+            391.9696350097656,
+            294.03
+          ],
+          [
+            391.9696350097656,
+            308.8305969238281
+          ],
+          [
+            220.32,
+            308.8305969238281
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "PROOF OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            249.08399999999997,
+            87.48
+          ],
+          [
+            363.4100036621094,
+            87.48
+          ],
+          [
+            363.4100036621094,
+            100.7005615234375
+          ],
+          [
+            249.08399999999997,
+            100.7005615234375
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            67
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            33
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            17
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            71
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            30
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            17
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737234"
+  }
+}

marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737236/EFTA02737236.md

@@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
+# UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
+
+for the
+
+Southern District of New York
+
+![](_page_0_Picture_131.jpeg)
+
+*Plaintiff(s)*
+
+v.
+
+DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN,  
+as EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF JEFFREY E.  
+EPSTEIN,
+
+*Defendant(s)*
+
+)  
+)  
+)  
+)  
+)  
+)  
+)  
+)  
+)  
+)  
+)  
+)  
+)  
+)  
+)  
+)
+
+Civil Action No. 19 Civ. 10788
+
+## SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION
+
+To: (*Defendant's name and address*) Darren K. Indyke  
+c/o Bennet J. Moskowitz, attorney  
+Troutman Sanders LLP  
+875 Third Avenue  
+New York, NY 10002
+
+A lawsuit has been filed against you.
+
+Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff's attorney, whose name and address are:
+
+Mariann Meier Wang  
+Cuti Hecker Wang LLP  
+305 Broadway, Suite 607  
+New York, New York 10007
+
+If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. You also must file your answer or motion with the court.
+
+CLERK OF COURT
+
+Date: 11/22/2019
+
+/s/ J. [REDACTED]
+
+![]()*Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk*
+
+Civil Action No. 19 Civ. 10788
+
+## PROOF OF SERVICE
+
+(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (I))
+
+This summons for (name of individual and title. if any) was received by me on (date)
+
+O I personally served the summons on the individual at (place) on (date) ; or
+
+O I left the summons at the individual's residence or usual place of abode with (name) , a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there, on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual's last known address; or
+
+O I served the summons on (name of individual) designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization) on (date) or , who is
+
+O I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or
+
+O Other (specify):
+
+My fees are \$ for travel and \$ for services, for a total of \$ 0.00
+
+I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.
+
+Date:
+
+Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:
+
+Server's signature
+
+Printed name and title
+
+Server's address

marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737236/EFTA02737236.metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,176 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737236.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 2,
+  "chars": 2429,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 6.49,
+  "image_assets": [
+    "_page_0_Picture_131.jpeg"
+  ],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            169.524,
+            62.37
+          ],
+          [
+            440.02799999999996,
+            62.37
+          ],
+          [
+            440.02799999999996,
+            81.0
+          ],
+          [
+            169.524,
+            81.0
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            220.93199999999996,
+            295.65
+          ],
+          [
+            388.00800000000004,
+            295.65
+          ],
+          [
+            388.00800000000004,
+            307.79999999999995
+          ],
+          [
+            220.93199999999996,
+            307.79999999999995
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "PROOF OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            249.08399999999997,
+            87.48
+          ],
+          [
+            363.4100036621094,
+            87.48
+          ],
+          [
+            363.4100036621094,
+            100.7005615234375
+          ],
+          [
+            249.08399999999997,
+            100.7005615234375
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            69
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            37
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            34
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "Picture",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            59
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            30
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            18
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737236"
+  }
+}

marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737238/EFTA02737238.md

@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
+
+for the
+
+Southern District of New York
+
+Plaintifils)
+
+v.
+
+DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, as EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendant(s)
+
+Civil Action No. 19 Civ. 10788
+
+## SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION
+
+To: (Defendant's name and address) Richard D. Kahn do Bennet J. Moskowitz, attorney Troutman Sanders LLP 875 Third Avenue New York, NY 10002
+
+A lawsuit has been filed against you.
+
+Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 (aX2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiffs attorney, whose name and address are: Mariann Meier Wang
+
+Cuti Hecker Wang LLP 305 Broadway, Suite 607 New York, New York 10007
+
+If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. You also must file your answer or motion with the court.
+
+CLERK OF COURT
+
+Date: 11/22/2019 /s/ J.
+
+Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk
+
+Civil Action No. 19 Civ. 10788
+
+## PROOF OF SERVICE
+
+(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (1))
+
+This summons for (name of individual and title. if any) was received by me on (date)
+
+O I personally served the summons on the individual at (place) on (date) ; or
+
+O I left the summons at the individual's residence or usual place of abode with (name) , a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there, on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual's last known address; or
+
+O I served the summons on (name of individual) designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization) on (date) or , who is
+
+O I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or
+
+O Other (specify):
+
+My fees are \$ for travel and \$ for services, for a total of \$ 0.00
+
+I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.
+
+Date: Server's signature
+
+Additional information regarding attempted service, etc
+
+Printed name and title
+
+Server's address

marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737238/EFTA02737238.metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,170 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737238.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 2,
+  "chars": 2287,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.1,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            170.13600000000002,
+            60.16986083984375
+          ],
+          [
+            444.3945617675781,
+            60.16986083984375
+          ],
+          [
+            444.3945617675781,
+            83.17822265625
+          ],
+          [
+            170.13600000000002,
+            83.17822265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            220.32,
+            294.03
+          ],
+          [
+            391.9696350097656,
+            294.03
+          ],
+          [
+            391.9696350097656,
+            308.8305969238281
+          ],
+          [
+            220.32,
+            308.8305969238281
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "PROOF OF SERVICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            248.47200000000004,
+            87.48
+          ],
+          [
+            362.765869140625,
+            87.48
+          ],
+          [
+            362.765869140625,
+            101.34405517578125
+          ],
+          [
+            248.47200000000004,
+            101.34405517578125
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            69
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            33
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            18
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            72
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            30
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            17
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737238"
+  }
+}

marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737240/EFTA02737240.md

@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
+
+x
+
+Case No. 19 Civ. 10788 (GFIW)
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+## NOTICE OF APPEARANCE
+
+-against-
+
+DARREN INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, as EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendants.
+
+x
+
+PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Gloria Allred of Allred, Maroko & Goldberg hereby appears as counsel for Plaintiff in the above-entitled action and requests that all filings and correspondence be served as follows:
+
+Gloria Allred ALLRED, MAROKO & GOLDBERG 305 Broadway, Suite 607 New York, New York 10007 (212) 202-2966 gallred@amglaw.com
+
+Dated: November 22, 2019
+
+New York, New York ALLRED, MAROKO & GOLDBERG
+
+By: /s/ Gloria Allred Gloria Allred (GA0682)
+
+305 Broadway, Suite 607 New York, New York 10007 (212) 202-2966 gallred@amglaw.com
+
+Attorneys for Plaintiff

marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737240/EFTA02737240.metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737240.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 1,
+  "chars": 804,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 0.96,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            68.544,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            281.8328552246094,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            281.8328552246094,
+            98.9830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            68.544,
+            98.9830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "NOTICE OF APPEARANCE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            356.18399999999997,
+            164.43
+          ],
+          [
+            515.5772094726562,
+            164.43
+          ],
+          [
+            515.5772094726562,
+            179.2330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            356.18399999999997,
+            179.2330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            60
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            31
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            15
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737240"
+  }
+}

marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737241/EFTA02737241.md

@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
+
+x
+
+Case No. 19 Civ. 10788 (GFIW)
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+## NOTICE OF APPEARANCE
+
+-against-
+
+DARREN INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, as EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendants.
+
+x
+
+PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Daniel Mullkoff of Cuti Hecker Wang LLP hereby appears as counsel for Plaintiff in the above-entitled action and requests that all filings and correspondence be served as follows:
+
+Daniel Mullkoff (dmullkoff@chwIlp.com) Cuti Hecker Wang LLP 305 Broadway, Suite 607 New York, NY 10007 212-620-2606 (telephone) 212-620-2616 (fax)
+
+Dated: November 22, 2019
+
+New York, New York CUTI HECICER WANG LLP
+
+By: /s/ Daniel Mullkoff Daniel Mullkoff (DM 5557)
+
+305 Broadway, Suite 607 New York, New York 10007 (212) 620-2606 dmullkoff@chwIlp.com
+
+Attorneys for Plaintiff

marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737241/EFTA02737241.metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737241.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 1,
+  "chars": 828,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 0.79,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            68.544,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            281.8328552246094,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            281.8328552246094,
+            98.9830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            68.544,
+            98.9830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "NOTICE OF APPEARANCE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            356.18399999999997,
+            164.43
+          ],
+          [
+            515.5772094726562,
+            164.43
+          ],
+          [
+            515.5772094726562,
+            179.2330322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            356.18399999999997,
+            179.2330322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            60
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            31
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            15
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737241"
+  }
+}

marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737242/EFTA02737242.md

@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
+
+Plaintiff, : -against-DARREN INDUCE, as Executor of the Estate : of Jeffrey E. Epstein, and RICHARD D. KAHN : as Executor of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, : Defendants. : USDC SDNY DOCUMENT I tlECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: 11/22/2019
+
+1:19-cv-10788-GHW
+
+## ORDER REFERRING CASE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE
+
+The above entitled action is referred to a United States magistrate judge for the following purpose:
+
+X General pretrial (includes scheduling, discovery, non-dispositive pretrial motions, and settlement)
+
+Specific non-dispositive motion/dispute:
+
+If referral is for discovery disputes when the District Judge is unavailable, the time period of the referral:
+
+Settlement
+
+Inquest after default/damages hearing
+
+Consent under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) for all purposes (including trial)
+
+SO ORDERED.
+
+Date: November 22, 2019 New York, New York Consent under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) for limited purpose (e.g., dispositive motion, preliminary injunction) Purpose:
+
+Habeas corpus Social Security
+
+Dispositive motion (it, motion requiring Report and Recommendation)
+
+Particular motion:
+
+All such motions:
+
+GRE United States District Judge

marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737242/EFTA02737242.metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737242.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 1,
+  "chars": 1195,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.04,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            69.156,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            282.9630126953125,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            282.9630126953125,
+            99.2335205078125
+          ],
+          [
+            69.156,
+            99.2335205078125
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "ORDER REFERRING CASE \nTO MAGISTRATE JUDGE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            364.14,
+            180.4381103515625
+          ],
+          [
+            513.456298828125,
+            180.4381103515625
+          ],
+          [
+            513.456298828125,
+            206.853515625
+          ],
+          [
+            364.14,
+            206.853515625
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            90
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            45
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            19
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737242"
+  }
+}

marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737243/EFTA02737243.md

@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+Bennet J. Moskowitz
+
+bennetmoskowitz@troutman.com
+
+December 4, 2019
+
+ECF
+
+Hon. GmcsH. Daniel Moynihan United States Courthouse 500 Pearl St. New York, NY 10007-1312
+
+Re: v. Darren. lndyke and Richard D. Kahn, as Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, 1:19-cv-10788 (GHW) (DCF)
+
+Dear Judge
+
+We represent Defendants Darren'. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (together, "Defendants"), in the referenced action. We write to respectfully request the Court's approval of the parties' agreement that Defendants have through January 20, 2020 to answer, move or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF No. 1).
+
+There have been no prior requests for adjournments or extensions in this action. The parties have also agreed to proceed with a Rule 26(f) conference on January 7, 2020 at 10AM.
+
+Thank you for your attention to this matter.
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+siBennet J. Moskowitz Bennet J. Moskowitz

marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737243/EFTA02737243.metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737243.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 1,
+  "chars": 953,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 0.77,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            59
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            30
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            12
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737243"
+  }
+}

marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737244/EFTA02737244.md

@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+# MEMORANDUM ENDORSED
+
+Deniel Moskowitz @ toutman.com
+
+Toutman Sanders LLP  
+875 Third Avenue  
+New York, New York 10022  
+toutman.com
+
+DATE FILED: 12/5/2019  
+DOC #:  
+ELECTRONICALLY FILED  
+DOCUMENT  
+FILED 12/05/19
+
+# MEMORANDUM ENDORSED
+
+December 4, 2019
+
+ECF
+
+Hon. Gerary H. [REDACTED]  
+Daniel [REDACTED] Moynihan  
+United States Courthouse  
+500 Pearl St.  
+New York, NY 10007-1312
+
+Re: [REDACTED] V. Darren [REDACTED] Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, as Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, "Defendants", in the referenced action. We write to respectfully request the Court's approval of the parties' agreement that Defendants have through January 20, 2020 to answer, move or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF No. 1). There have been no prior requests for adjournments or extensions in this action. The parties have also agreed to proceed with a Rule 26(f) conference on January 7, 2020 at 10AM. Thank you for your attention to this matter.
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+Bennet J. Moskowitz  
+*s/Bennet J. Moskowitz*
+
+The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion pending at Date No. 10.
+
+Dated: December 5, 2019
+
+SO ORDERED.
+
+United States District Judge
+
+GREGORY H. [REDACTED]
+
+[REDACTED]

marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737244/EFTA02737244.metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737244.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 1,
+  "chars": 1222,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 13.8,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "MEMORANDUM ENDORSED",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            15.3,
+            669.87
+          ],
+          [
+            238.06800000000004,
+            669.87
+          ],
+          [
+            238.06800000000004,
+            686.0699999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            15.3,
+            686.0699999999999
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "MEMORANDUM ENDORSED",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            15.3,
+            669.87
+          ],
+          [
+            115.05599999999998,
+            669.87
+          ],
+          [
+            115.05599999999998,
+            686.0699999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            15.3,
+            686.0699999999999
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            89
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            42
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            33
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737244"
+  }
+}

marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737245/EFTA02737245.md

@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+Bennet J. Moskowitz bennet.moskowitz@troutman.com
+
+December 5, 2019
+
+ECF
+
+The Honorable Judge Debra Freeman Magistrate Judge United States District Court Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007
+
+Re: v. Darren'. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, as Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, 1:19-cv-10788 (GHW) (DCF)
+
+Dear Judge Freeman:
+
+We represent Defendants Darren,. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (together, "Defendants"), in the referenced action. We write to respectfully request the Court's approval of the parties' agreement that Defendants have through January 20, 2020 to answer, move or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF No. 1).
+
+There have been no prior requests for adjournments or extensions in this action. The parties have also agreed to proceed with a Rule 26(f) conference on January 7, 2020 at 10AM.
+
+Thank you for your attention to this matter.
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+s/Bennet J. Moskowitz Bennet J. Moskowitz

marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737245/EFTA02737245.metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737245.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 1,
+  "chars": 1018,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 0.73,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            62
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            31
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            11
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737245"
+  }
+}

marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737246/EFTA02737246.md

@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+Bennet J. Moskowitz bennet.moskowitz@troutman.com
+
+January 10, 2020
+
+ECF
+
+Hon. Debra C. Freeman Daniel Moynihan United States Courthouse 500 Pearl St. New York, NY 10007
+
+Re: Jane Doe 15, 1:19-cv-10653-PAE-DCF; Mary Doe, 1:19-cv-10758-PAE-DCF; 1:19-cv-10788-GHW-DCF
+
+Dear Judge Freeman:
+
+We represent Defendants Darren,. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein to ether "Defendants"; and Defendants together with Plaintiffs Jane Doe 15, Mary Doe, and , the "Parties") in the referenced actions. Pursuant to the Court's direction at the initial conference, we write on behalf of all Parties to report to the Court regarding status on these actions.
+
+First, with respect to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program (the "Program"), Plaintiffs' counsel in these actions have reviewed the Program's protocol and begun to propose substantive changes to it and to confer with the Program's designers and administrator, and are considering whether their clients will participate.
+
+Second, with respect to the litigation of these three actions, the Parties conducted their Rule 26(f) conference by telephone yesterday, and are proceeding to finalize stipulations with respect to anonymity (to the extent that is relevant, for two of the three actions) and a Protective Order; the Parties further agree to exchange initial disclosures by January 23, 2020, proposed discovery schedules by January 301h, and then to propose a jointly agreed upon (or, absent an agreement, our alternate proposals) to Your Honor by February 6, 2020.
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+s/Bennet J. Moskowitz Bennet J. Moskowitz

marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737246/EFTA02737246.metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737246.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 1,
+  "chars": 1626,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 0.78,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            81
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            39
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            11
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737246"
+  }
+}

marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737247/EFTA02737247.md

@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
+The Clerk of Court of the Southern District of New York is directed to docket the within ORDER in each of the following actions:
+
+![](_page_0_Picture_15.jpeg)
+
+VE v. Nine East 71st Street et al., No. 1:19-cv-07625 (AJN) (DF)
+
+Katlyn Doe v. Indyke et at, No. 1:19-cv-07771 (PKC) (DF)
+
+Priscilla Doe v. Indyke et at, No. 1:19-cv-07772 (ALC) (DF)
+
+Lisa Doe v. Indyke et al., No. 1:19-cv-07773 (ER) (DF)
+
+Jane Doe v. Indyke et at, No. 1:19-cv-08673 (KPF) (DF)
+
+v. Indyke et al., No. 1:19-cv-10475 (LGS) (DF)
+
+v. Indyke et at, No. 1:19-cv-10476 (PGG) (DF)
+
+v. Indyke et at, No. 1:19-cv-10479 (ALC) (DF)
+
+Jane Doe 1000 v. Indyke et at, No. 1:19-cv-10577 (LGS) (DF)
+
+Jane Doe 15 v. Indyke et al., No. I :19-cv-10653 (PAE) (DF)
+
+Mary Doe v. Indyke et at, No. 1:19-cv-I 0758 (PAE) (DF)
+
+v. Indyke et at, No. 1:19-cv-10788 (GHW) (DF)
+
+Anastasia Doe v. Indyke et at, No. 1:19-cv-11869 (AJN) (DF)
+
+## DEBRA FREEMAN, United States Magistrate Judge:
+
+The above-referenced cases — all brought by plaintiffs claiming that they were sexually abused by Jeffrey Epstein and seeking damages from his estate — have been neither consolidated for any purpose, nor designated as "related" by the Court. Nonetheless, these cases (together with certain other, similar cases, not listed above) have been referred to the undersigned for general pretrial supervision, so that discovery — and potentially settlement — may be coordinated as reasonable. While, at the parties' request, discovery in the other Jeffrey Epstein cases referred to this Court has been stayed pending a further report on the parties' settlement efforts, the parties to each of the above-referenced cases have requested, by submissions dated January 10, 2020, that this Court set a discovery schedule. This Court's having reviewed the parties' submissions, it is hereby ORDERED that:
+
+1. In each of the above-referenced cases in which the parties have not yet submitted a jointly proposed discovery plan pursuant to Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties are directed to submit a proposed discovery schedule for this Court's review no later
+
+than February 6, 2020. This submission should address all of the matters set out in Rule 26(f)(3), and should specifically include proposed deadlines for:
+
+- a service of initial disclosures under Rule 26(a)(1);
+- b. service of initial document requests and interrogatories;
+- c. any motion for joinder of other parties or amendment of the pleadings;
+- d. completion of fact discovery; and
+- e. expert disclosures and the completion of expert discovery, if any.
+
+2. As to each of the above-referenced cases, this Court will hold a pretrial conference pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on February 11, 2020, at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom 17A at the United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007. The parties should be aware, however, that the mere fact that this Court will be holding a single, joint case-management conference does not necessarily mean that this Court will set an identical discovery schedule in each case. At the conference, counsel should be prepared to address whether there are reasons why these cases should be treated differently for scheduling purposes.
+
+Dated: New York, New York January 14, 2019
+
+SO ORDERED
+
+Ahles A9-7 DEBRA FREEMAN United States Magistrate Judge
+
+Copies to:
+
+All counsel in the above-referenced cases (via ECF)

marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737247/EFTA02737247.metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,134 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737247.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 2,
+  "chars": 3407,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.24,
+  "image_assets": [
+    "_page_0_Picture_15.jpeg"
+  ],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "DEBRA FREEMAN, United States Magistrate Judge:",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            68.544,
+            336.15
+          ],
+          [
+            350.9979553222656,
+            336.15
+          ],
+          [
+            350.9979553222656,
+            352.4830322265625
+          ],
+          [
+            68.544,
+            352.4830322265625
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            72
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            36
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            16
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Picture",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            52
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            26
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737247"
+  }
+}

marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737249/EFTA02737249.md

@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+Bennet J. Moskowitz bennet.moskowitz@troutman.com
+
+January 21, 2020
+
+ECF
+
+Hon. GmcsH. Daniel Moynihan United States Courthouse 500 Pearl St. New York, NY 10007-1312
+
+Re: v. Darren K. lndyke and Richard D. Kahn, as Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, 1:19-cv-10788 (GHW) (DCF)
+
+Dear Judge
+
+We represent Defendants Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (together, the "Co-Executors"), in the above-referenced action. We write pursuant to Your Honor's Individual Rules 1(A) and 2(C)(i) to set forth the grounds for the Co-Executors' anticipated motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) to dismiss the time-barred claims and punitive damages demand in Plaintiff Complaint (ECF No. 1).
+
+## 1. Plaintiff alleges torts occurring over 15 years ago in NY and other jurisdictions.
+
+Plaintiff, who claims Arizona residency, alleges that Mr. Epstein, now deceased, sexually assaulted her from 2002 to 2004 in Florida, New Mexico, New York, the U.S. Virgin Islands ("USVI") and France. (Compl. ¶¶ 4, 12, 17, 29, 34, 59-61.) Plaintiff alleges causes of action for battery, assault, and intentional infliction of emotional distress (Id. ¶¶ 71 - 82.) Plaintiff seeks, among other things, "punitive damages in an amount to be determined." (Id. p. 12.)
+
+## 2. Plaintiff's causes of action are partially time-barred.
+
+CPLR § 202 provides that, when a non-New York resident such as Plaintiff sues on a cause of action accruing outside New York, the complaint must be filed timely under the statute of limitations of both New York and the jurisdiction where the cause of action accrued. A claim that is untimely under one or both of the two jurisdictions must be dismissed.
+
+Plaintiff turned 18 at some point in 2003. (Compl. ¶ 34.) Plaintiff alleges she was sexually assaulted by Mr. Epstein until 2004, i.e., when Plaintiff was an adult (Compl. ¶¶ 34, 5961). Accordingly, excluding Plaintiff's alleged torts subject to the New York Child Victims Act,' if any, Plaintiff's causes of action sounding in battery must be commenced within one year of accrual (CPLR § 215(3)); or, if Plaintiff's claims sound in personal injury, within three years (CPLR § 214(5)). Therefore, under New York law, Plaintiff's claims arising from her alleged sexual abuse expired in 2007 at the latest.
+
+Plaintiff's claims based on alleged torts occurring outside New York also expired long ago, including torts that occurred while she was a minor, as follows: (Florida) for torts occurring while she was a minor, the later of within 7 years after she reached age of majority (Le., by 2010), within 4 years after she left the dependency of Mr. Epstein (2008 at the latest),2 or within 4 years from the time she discovered both the injury and the causal relationship between the injury and the abuse (Fla. Stat. § 95.11(7));3 and, after Plaintiff reached age of majority, within 4 years (Le., sometime in 2007) (Fla. Stat. § 95.11 (3)(O)); (New Mexico) for torts occurring while she was a minor, the later of the "first instant" of Plaintiff's 24th birthday (i.e., sometime in 2009) or 3 years from the date that Plaintiff first disclosed her childhood sexual abuse to a licensed medical or mental health care provider in the context of receiving health care (N.M. Stat. § 37-1- 30) (plaintiff alleges she never made such a disclosure (Compl. ¶ 67)); and, after Plaintiff reached age of majority, 3 years (i.e., in 2006) (N.M. Stat. § 37-1-8); (USVI) when Plaintiff turned 23 (Le., sometime in 2008) (5 V.I.C. §§ 31(5)(A), 36(a)(1)).
+
+Although Plaintiff suggests she is only suing on claims based on torts that occurred while she was still a minor (Compl. ¶ 69), she also alleges Mr. Epstein abused her "for years" (Id. at ¶ 29). The Court is not required to reconcile Plaintiff's contradictory allegations. See Whitley v. Bowden, No. 17-CV-3564 (KMK), 2018 WL 2170313, at '11 (S.D.N.Y. May 9, 2018) ("'a court is neither obligated to reconcile nor accept the contradictory allegations in the pleadings as true in deciding a motion to dismiss.- (citation omitted)).
+
+Therefore, Plaintiff's claims based on torts occurring in New York after she reached majority, as well as her claims based on torts occurring in New Mexico, Florida and the USVI regardless of whether she was a minor at the time — must be dismissed.
+
+The Child Victims Act created a one-year window period in which civil claims alleging damages "suffered as a result of conduct which would constitute a sexual offense as defined in article one hundred thirty of the penal law committed against a child less than eighteen years of age" may be filed despite the statute of limitations having already run. CPLR § 214-g (emphasis added).
+
+<sup>2</sup> Plaintiff alleges Mr. Epstein "cast her out" in 2004. (Compl. ¶¶ 59-61.) Therefore, Plaintiff could not have depended on him after that time.
+
+<sup>3</sup> Plaintiff's allegations that she is only now beginning to "process" her injuries (Compl. ¶¶ 65, 68) is not equivalent to alleging tolling due to her belated discovery of such injuries. She makes no such allegation.
+
+## 3. Plaintiff's claim for punitive damages fails as a matter of law.
+
+Courts in this District regularly grant motions to dismiss claims for punitive damages. See, e.g., The Cookware Co. (USA), LLC v. Austin, No. 15 Civ. 5796, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 177691, at '17 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 8, 2016) (Batts, J.) (granting motion to dismiss claim for punitive damages without leave to replead because allegations regarding defendant's bad faith conduct were conclusory and did not rise to required level of malice); SJB v. N.Y.C. Dept of Educ., No. 03 Civ. 6653, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13227, at '25-26 (S.D.N.Y. July 14, 2004) (Buchwald, J.) (granting motion to dismiss punitive damages claims because punitive damages were not statutorily available); Blasetti v. Pietropolo, 213 F. Supp. 2d 425, 431-32 (S.D.N.Y. 2002) (Kaplan, J.) (the] claim for punitive damages ... is dismissed.").
+
+Here, Plaintiff's claim for punitive damages must be dismissed as a matter of law because none of the jurisdictions where the alleged torts against Plaintiff occurred permit punitive damages against the personal representatives of a decedent tortfeasor's estate. See Poindexter v. Zacharzewski, 18-civ-14155, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 189861, at '6 (Nov. 5, 2018 S.D. Fla.) ("Florida law prohibits recovery of punitive damages from the estate of a wrongdoer who is deceased."); Jaramillo v. Providence Wash. Ins. Co., 117 N.M. 337, 346 (N.M. 1994) ("punishment and deterrence are not accomplished by enabling recovery of punitive damages from the estate of deceased tortfeasors."); NY EPTL § 11-3.2 (a)(1) ("For any injury, an action may be brought or continued against the personal representative of the decedent, but punitive damages shall not be awarded nor penalties adjudged in any such action brought to recover damages for personal injury." (emphasis added)). That is also the law in most U.S. jurisdictions, as reflected in the Restatement (Second) of Torts. See Restat. (Second) Of Torts § 908 cmt. a ("Punitive damages are not awarded against the representatives of a deceased tortfeasor."). See also Powell v. Chi-Co's Distrib., No. ST-13-TOR-14, 2014 V.I. LEXIS 21, at '5 n.13 (U.S.V.I. Super. Ct. Apr. 3, 2014) (Section 908(2) of the Restatement (Second) of Torts "reflects the common law of this jurisdiction") 4.5
+
+USVI courts apply a -Banks analysis" to determine U.S.V.I. common law. Banks v. Intl Rental & Leasing Corp., 55 V.I. 967, 979 (V.I. 2011). The Banks analysis includes consideration of three factors: (1) whether any USVI courts have previously adopted a particular rule; (2) the position taken by a majority of courts of other jurisdictions; and (iina importantly, which approach represents the soundest rule for the USVI. Gov't of Virgin Islands v. No. S. CT. CIV. 2013-0095, 2014 WL 702639, at '1 (V.I. Feb. 24, 2014). Each Banks factor favors the Estate: (1) pre-Banks, USVI courts expressed approval for the general rule that punitive dii cannot be recovered against the personal representatives of a wrongdoer's estate (see. e.g.. v. Dowson Holding Co., 51 V.I. 619, 628 (D.V.I. 2009) (considering the inverse issue)); (2) a majority of courts from other jurisdictions preclude punitive damages against the personal representatives of a wrongdoers estate (2 Linda L. Schlueter, Punitive Damages § 20.4 (7th ed. 2015)); and (3) post-Banks, USVI courts have held Restatement § 908 represents the soundest rule for the USVI (see Powell. supra.).
+
+law does not recognize punitive damages. See 2 Linda L. Schlueter, Punitive Damages § 22.4 (7th ed. 2015) (citing Rouhette, The Availability of Punitive Damages in Europe: Growing Trend or Nonexistent Concept, 74 Def. Coun. J. 320 (2007)).
+
+Respectfully submitted,
+
+s/Bennet J. Moskowitz Bennet J. Moskowitz

marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737249/EFTA02737249.metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,246 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737249.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 4,
+  "chars": 8861,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.27,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "1. Plaintiff alleges torts occurring over 15 years ago in NY and other jurisdictions.",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            86.904,
+            462.51
+          ],
+          [
+            525.8209228515625,
+            462.51
+          ],
+          [
+            525.8209228515625,
+            476.9470520019531
+          ],
+          [
+            86.904,
+            476.9470520019531
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "2. Plaintiff's causes of action are partially time-barred.",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            86.904,
+            571.05
+          ],
+          [
+            382.0167236328125,
+            571.05
+          ],
+          [
+            382.0167236328125,
+            584.9470520019531
+          ],
+          [
+            86.904,
+            584.9470520019531
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "3. Plaintiff's claim for punitive damages fails as a matter of law.",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            86.904,
+            115.01999999999998
+          ],
+          [
+            429.6344909667969,
+            115.01999999999998
+          ],
+          [
+            429.6344909667969,
+            129.3170166015625
+          ],
+          [
+            86.904,
+            129.3170166015625
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            79
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            39
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            94
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            40
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            95
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            47
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "Footnote",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            17
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            9
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737249"
+  }
+}

marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737253/EFTA02737253.md

@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+USDC SDNY  
+DOCUMENT  
+ELECTRONICALLY FILED  
+DOC #:  
+DATE FILED: 1/22/2020
+
+UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT  
+SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK  
+[REDACTED]  
+X
+
+[REDACTED]  
+Plaintiff,  
+-against-  
+DARREN ■ INDYKE, as Executor of the Estate  
+of Jeffrey E. Epstein, and RICHARD D. KAHN  
+as Executor of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein,  
+Defendants, :  
+X
+
+The above entitled action is referred to a United States magistrate judge for the following purpose:
+
+X General pertinal (includes scheduling, discovery, non-dispositive pretrial motions, and settlement)  
+Specific non-dispositive motion/dispute:  
+[REDACTED]  
+Habeas corpus  
+Dispositive motion (& &, dispositive motion, preliminary injunction)  
+Purpose:  
+[REDACTED]  
+Consent under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) for limited purpose (&, dispositive motion, Social Security Security Preliminary injunction)  
+[REDACTED]  
+Habeas corpus  
+[REDACTED]  
+Dispositive motion (&, motion X regularly Report and Recommendation)  
+[REDACTED]  
+All such motions: X
+
+Settlement -  
+Inguest after default/damages hearing  
+Consent under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) for all purposes (including trial)  
+Date: January 22, 2020  
+New York, NY  
+GREGORY H. [REDACTED]  
+United States District judge
+
+SO ORDERED.
+
+[Signature of Gregory H. [REDACTED]]

marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737253/EFTA02737253.metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737253.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 1,
+  "chars": 1271,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 5.8,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "SO ORDERED.",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            422.28,
+            198.45000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            507.96,
+            198.45000000000002
+          ],
+          [
+            507.96,
+            214.64999999999998
+          ],
+          [
+            422.28,
+            214.64999999999998
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            92
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            46
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            22
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737253"
+  }
+}

marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737254/EFTA02737254.md

@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+January 27, 2020
+
+By ECF
+
+Hon. Debra Freeman
+
+U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
+
+Daniel Moynihan
+
+United States Courthouse
+
+500 Pearl St.
+
+New York, NY 10007.1312
+
+Your Honor:
+
+Re: v. Indyke et at., 19-cv-10788 (GHW)(DCF)
+
+We represent Plaintiff and write on behalf of all parties.
+
+On January 21, 2020, Defendants submitted a pre-motion letter to Judge proposing to file a motion to dismiss. (ECF 16). On January 22, Judge issued an Amended Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge clarifying that diapositive motions in this matter will be referred to Your Honor for Report & Recommendation. (ECF 17). It is our understanding of Your Honor's Individual Practices that no pm-motion letters are required for motions other than discovery motions, though Plaintiffs counsel is of course happy/prepared to submit one should Your Honor prefer that.
+
+Accordingly, we write 1) to seek clarification that Plaintiff need not submit a letter in response to Defendants' January 21 pre-motion letter addressed to Judge and 2) to propose the following briefing schedule for Defendants' motion:
+
+Defendants' motion papers to be filed by February 25, 2020; Plaintiffs' opposition papers to be filed by March 17, 2020; Defendants' reply papers to be filed by March 31, 2020.
+
+We appreciate Your Honor's attention to this matter.
+
+Very truly yours,
+
+/s/ Mariann Meier Wang
+
+cc: Bennet J. Moskowitz, Counsel for Defendants (by ECF)

marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737254/EFTA02737254.metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737254.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 2,
+  "chars": 1438,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.03,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            73
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            37
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            18
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            3
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737254"
+  }
+}

marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737256/EFTA02737256.md

@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+MARIANN MEIER WANG  
+212.620.2603 TEL  
+212.620.2613 FAX
+
+MWANG@CHWLLP.COM
+
+USDC SDNY  
+DOCUMENT  
+ELECTRONICALLY FILED  
+DOC #: \_\_\_\_\_  
+DATE FILED: 1/28/2020
+
+*Before this Court sets a briefing schedule for a motion to dismiss, counsel are due to submit an update repaiding their settlement dismissions, specifically addressing the potential for their action being resolved without the need for motion practice.*
+
+January 27, 2020
+
+By ECF  
+Hon. Debra Freeman  
+U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York  
+Daniel [REDACTED] Moynihan  
+United States Courthouse  
+500 Pearl St.  
+New York, NY 10007-1312
+
+SO ORDERED: DATE: 1/28/2020
+
+Re: [REDACTED] v. Indyke et al., 19-cv-10788 (GHWDCF)  
+DEBRA FREEMAN
+
+UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
+
+Your Honor:
+
+We represent Plaintiff [REDACTED] and write on behalf of all parties.
+
+On January 21, 2020, Defendants submitted a pre-motion letter to Judge [REDACTED] proposing to file a motion to dismiss. (ECF 16). On January 22, Judge [REDACTED] issued an Amended Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge clarifying that dispositive motions in this matter will be referred to Your Honor for Report & Recommendation. (ECF 17). It is our understanding of Your Honor's Individual Practices that no pre-motion letters are required for motions other than discovery motions, though Plaintiff's counsel is of course happy/prepared to submit one should Your Honor prefer that.
+
+Accordingly, we write 1) to seek clarification that Plaintiff need not submit a letter in response to Defendants' January 21 pre-motion letter addressed to Judge [REDACTED], and 2) to propose the following briefing schedule for Defendants' motion:
+
+- - Defendants' motion papers to be filed by February 25, 2020;
+- - Plaintiffs' opposition papers to be filed by March 17, 2020;
+- - Defendants' reply papers to be filed by March 31, 2020.
+
+We appreciate Your Honor's attention to this matter.
+
+Very truly yours,
+
+/s/ Mariann Meier Wang

marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737256/EFTA02737256.metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737256.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 1,
+  "chars": 1962,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 8.27,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            44
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737256"
+  }
+}

marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737257/EFTA02737257.md

@@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
+By ECF
+
+February 6, 2020
+
+Hon. Debra Freeman U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Daniel Moynihan United States Courthouse 500 Pearl St. New York, NY 10007.1312
+
+> Re: Jane Doe 15 u. Indyke et at, 19-cv-10653 (PAE)(DCF) Ma Doe u. Indyke et al., 19-cv-10758 (PAE)(DCF) u. Indyke et at, 19-cv-10788 (GHW)(DCF)
+
+Your Honor:
+
+We represent the plaintiffs in the three above-referenced cases. As directed in Your Honor's Order dated January 14, 2020, we write jointly with counsel for Defendants Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (the "Co-Executors"), to provide a proposed discovery schedule for these cases. The area where the parties have not reached agreement is indicated in italics, and each side's position is set forth below.
+
+- 1. Initial disclosures under Rule 26(a)(1) were exchanged on January 23, 2020.
+- 2. Plaintiffs will provide HIPAA-compliant medical records release authorizations to Defendants no later than 14 days from Defendants' request, provided such date is not earlier than February 28, 2020.
+- 3. The parties shall serve initial document requests and interrogatories by 30 days from the Court's entry of the discovery schedule. Plaintiffs served Defendants with their initial document requests and interrogatories but the parties have agreed that Defendants have until February 28, 2020 to respond thereto.
+- 4. Any motion for joinder of other parties or amendment of the pleadings shall be made by 30 days from the Court's entry of the discovery schedule.
+
+## 5. *Deadlines for fact and expert discovery*
+
+### **Plaintiffs' Position**
+
+Plaintiffs' position is that the default timelines set forth in both Judge Engelmayer's and Judge [REDACTED] Civil Case Management Plan and Scheduling Orders should be used, which provide for:
+
+- ○ Fact discovery to be completed 120 days after the Court's entry of the discovery schedule
+- ○ Expert disclosures to be made by the fact discovery deadline
+- ○ Rebuttal expert disclosures to be made 14 days after expert disclosures
+- ○ Expert discovery to be completed 45 days after the close of fact discovery
+
+Both Judge Engelmayer's and Judge [REDACTED] Civil Case Management Plan and Scheduling Orders indicate that those timelines be used unless the case presents "unique complexities or exceptional circumstances." Plaintiffs have few documents in their possession, and expect that these cases will not involve an unusual number of depositions. Plaintiffs do not believe that the fact that the Co-Executors are defendants in multiple lawsuits makes the discovery process in these lawsuits more complex or time-consuming. To the contrary, the fact that multiple lawsuits have been filed (including prior to these actions) suggests that the Co-Executors should have been working to identify and locate responsive documents many months ago.
+
+### **Co-Executors' Position**
+
+The Co-Executors' position is that the parties should adopt a compromise schedule. The Co-Executors disagree that the cases Plaintiffs filed do not present "unique complexities or exceptional circumstances." Among other things, there are more than twenty cases pending in various jurisdictions against the Co-Executors concerning various time frames, parties, non-parties and alleged conduct. Also, the Defendants are the Co-Executors of a large Estate, not an individual alleged tortfeasor. As a result, discovery in these matters requires more flexibility than typical lawsuits.
+
+Separately, it does not make sense to require that the parties' expert disclosures coincide with completion of fact discovery. The experts should have at least 30 days from the close of fact discovery to proffer initial reports. Nor is it reasonable for experts to proffer rebuttal reports a mere 14 days after receiving initial reports from each other. Thirty days is more appropriate.
+
+The original dates the Co-Executors proposed and which Plaintiff rejected, as well as the Co-Executors' compromise proposals, which Plaintiff also rejected, are as follows:
+
+- ○ Completion of fact discovery: 160 days from the Court's entry of the discovery schedule. (Compromise proposal: 140 days.)
+
+- o Expert disclosures and completion of expert discovery: 240 days from the Court's entry of the discovery schedule. (Compromise proposal: 200 days.) o Expert reports due 30 days from the close of fact discovery; and rebuttal reports due 30 days thereafter.
+- 6. The subjects on which discovery may be needed, when discovery should be completed, and whether discovery should be conducted in phases or be limited to or focused on particular issues
+
+The general subjects of each action are: (1) Mr. Epstein's alleged abuse of plaintiffs; and (2) the plaintiffs' alleged damages. We see no reason to stage discovery.
+
+- 7. Any issues about disclosure, discovery, or preservation of electronically stored information, including the form or forms in which it should be produced
+
+The parties will confer about an ESI protocol.
+
+- 8. Any issues about claims of privilege or of protection as trial-preparation materials, including—if the parties agree on a procedure to assert these claims after production—whether to ask the court to include their agreement in an order under Federal Rule of Evidence 502
+
+The parties are conferring about confidentiality orders in these cases, and expect to submit proposed orders to the Court soon, which will include a standard clawback provision regarding privileged materials.
+
+- 9. What changes should be made in the limitations on discovery imposed under these rules or by local rule, and what other limitations should be imposed
+
+The parties have no proposed changes at this time.
+
+- 10. Any other orders that the court should issue under Rule 26(c) or under Rule 16(b) and (c)
+
+The parties have no proposed orders at this time other than the protective orders mentioned above.
+
+\* \* \*
+
+Finally, with respect to v. Indyke et at, 19-cv-10788 (GHVV)(DCF), in the Memo Endorsement dated January 28, 2020 (ECF 19), Your Honor directed the parties to submit an update addressing the status of settlement discussions before the Court sets a briefing scheduling for Defendants' proposed motion to dismiss. Plaintiff remains open to the possibility of participating in the
+
+proposed voluntary compensation program if and when such program is approved, but it has not yet been approved. The parties have not yet had substantive settlement discussions.
+
+We appreciate Your Honor's attention to these matters.
+
+Very truly yours,
+
+/s/ Mariann Meier Wang
+
+Mariann Meier Wang
+
+cc: Counsel for Defendants, by ECF

marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737257/EFTA02737257.metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,246 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737257.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 4,
+  "chars": 6612,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 8.9,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "5. Deadlines for fact and expert discovery",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            64.25999999999999,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            299.88,
+            71.28
+          ],
+          [
+            299.88,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            64.25999999999999,
+            85.85999999999999
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Plaintiffs' Position",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            67.932,
+            100.44
+          ],
+          [
+            189.72,
+            100.44
+          ],
+          [
+            189.72,
+            114.20999999999998
+          ],
+          [
+            67.932,
+            114.20999999999998
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "Co-Executors' Position",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            67.932,
+            402.57
+          ],
+          [
+            210.52799999999996,
+            402.57
+          ],
+          [
+            210.52799999999996,
+            416.34000000000003
+          ],
+          [
+            67.932,
+            416.34000000000003
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            72
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            35
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "surya",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Text",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 2,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            69
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            35
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            5
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 3,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            19
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            10
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737257"
+  }
+}

marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737261/EFTA02737261.md

@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
+The Clerk of Court of the Southern District of New York is directed to docket the within ORDER in each of the following actions:
+
+USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED poc tr. DATE FILEICallQ2a. VE v. Nine East 71st Street et at, No. 1:19-cv-07625 (AJN) (DF)
+
+Katlyn Doe v. Indyke et at, No. 1:19-cv-07771 (PKC) (DF)
+
+Priscilla Doe v. Indyke et at, No. 1:19-cv-07772 (ALC) (DF)
+
+Lisa Doe v. Indyke et at, No. 1:19-cv-07773 (ER) (DF)
+
+Jane Doe v. Indyke et at, No. 1:19-cv-08673 (KPF) (DF)
+
+v. Indyke et aL, No. 1:19-cv-10475 (LGS) (DF)
+
+v. Indyke et aL, No. 1:19-cv-10476 (PGG) (DF)
+
+v. Indyke et at, No. 1:19-cv-10479 (ALC) (DF)
+
+Jane Doe 1000 v. Indyke et aL, No. 1:19-cv-10577 (LGS) (DF)
+
+Jane Doe 15 v. Indyke et aL, No. 1:19-cv-10653 (PAE) (DF)
+
+Mary Doe v. Indyke et at, No. 1:19-cv-10758 (PAE) (DF)
+
+v. Indyke et at, No. 1:19-cv-10788 (O1-IW) (DF)
+
+Anastasia Doe v. Indyke et at, No. 1:19-cv-11869 (AJN) (DF)
+
+## DEBRA FREEMAN, United States Magistrate Judge:
+
+The Court having held a case management conference on February 11, 2020, with counsel for all parties in the above-referenced cases, it is hereby ORDERED, as stated at the conference, that:
+
+- 1. To the extent not already made, the parties shall make initial disclosures under Rule 26(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure no later than February 25, 2020.
+- 2. The parties shall serve their initial document requests and interrogatories no later than March 10, 2020. In their initial interrogatories, the parties may, as reasonable, seek information outside the scope of Local Civil Rule 33.3(a).
+- 3. Any motions to amend the pleadings or to join any additional parties shall be filed no later than April 30, 2020.
+  - 4. All fact discovery shall be completed no later than June 10, 2020.
+
+- 5. Expert discovery shall be conducted on the following schedule:
+  - a. Plaintiffs' expert reports shall be served no later than June 10, 2020.
+  - b. Defendants' rebuttal reports shall be served no later than July 10, 2020.
+  - c. Expert discovery shall be completed no later than July 31, 2020.
+
+6. The parties may stipulate to modify interim deadlines in this Scheduling Order, without seeking prior leave of Court.
+
+7. The parties to the above-referenced cases shall submit joint status reports to the Court, regarding discovery and the progress of settlement discussions, no later than April 30, 2020.
+
+Dated: New York, New York February 11, 2020
+
+SO ORDERED
+
+DEBRA FREEMAN United States Magistrate Judge
+
+Copies to:
+
+All counsel in the above-referenced cases (via ECF)

marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737261/EFTA02737261.metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737261.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 2,
+  "chars": 2546,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 0.97,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "DEBRA FREEMAN, United States Magistrate Judge:",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            67.932,
+            336.15
+          ],
+          [
+            351.7479248046875,
+            336.15
+          ],
+          [
+            351.7479248046875,
+            352.863037109375
+          ],
+          [
+            67.932,
+            352.863037109375
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            68
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            34
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            16
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            38
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            19
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            7
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListItem",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "ListGroup",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737261"
+  }
+}

marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737263/EFTA02737263.md

@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
+
+X
+
+Plaintiff,
+
+: Index No. 1:19-cv-10788-GHW-DCF
+
+v.
+
+DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, as EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN,
+
+Defendants.
+
+X
+
+## AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE
+
+I, Mary "Molly" S. DiRago, declare as follow:
+
+I. I am a member in good standing of the State Bar of Illinois and an associate with the law firm Troutman Sanders LLP, counsel for Defendants, Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn as Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (together, the "Co-Executors"). I submit this affidavit in support of my Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice before this Court.
+
+2. I have never been convicted of a felony.
+
+3. I have never been censured, suspended, disbarred, or denied admission or readmission by any court.
+
+4. There are no disciplinary proceedings presently against me.
+
+I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct.
+
+Dated: February 13, 2020 Respectfully Submitted,
+
+Is/ Mary "Molly" S. DiRago
+
+Mary "Molly" S. DiRago (Pro Hac Vice Pending)
+
+Troutman Sanders LLP
+
+One North Wacker Drive, Suite 2905
+
+Chicago, 60606
+
+(312) 759-1926
+
+(312) 759-1939 (Fax)
+
+molly.dirago@troutman.com
+
+Attorneys for Defendants Darren K. Indyke and
+
+Richard D. Kahn, Co-Executors of the Estate of
+
+Jeffrey E. Epstein

marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737263/EFTA02737263.metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,143 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737263.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 2,
+  "chars": 1403,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 1.02,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            70.38,
+            84.24
+          ],
+          [
+            281.419189453125,
+            84.24
+          ],
+          [
+            281.419189453125,
+            112.10302734375
+          ],
+          [
+            70.38,
+            112.10302734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            100.98000000000002,
+            309.7315673828125
+          ],
+          [
+            512.6567993164062,
+            309.7315673828125
+          ],
+          [
+            512.6567993164062,
+            324.0
+          ],
+          [
+            100.98000000000002,
+            324.0
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            51
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            25
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            14
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            28
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            14
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            13
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737263"
+  }
+}

marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737265/EFTA02737265.md

@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+## Certificate of Admission To the Bar of Illinois
+
+I, Carolyn Taft Grosboll, Clerk of the Supreme Court of Illinois, do hereby certify that
+
+Mary Sharon DiRago
+
+has been duly licensed and admitted to practice as an Attorney and Counselor at Law within this State; has duly taken the required oath to support the CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES and of the STATE OF ILLINOIS, and also the oath of office prescribed by law, that said name was entered upon the Roll of Attorneys and Counselors in my office on 11/04/2004 and is in good standing, so far as the records of this office disclose.
+
+> IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my name and affixed the seal of said Court, this 31st day of January, 2020.
+
+> > Croy Gtsidee
+
+Clerk, Supreme Court of the State of Illinois
+
+## CERTIFICATE OF GOOD STANDING
+
+![](_page_1_Picture_2.jpeg)
+
+United States of America
+
+}ss. Mary S DiRago
+
+Northern District of Illinois
+
+G. Bruton , Clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois,
+
+DO HEREBY CERTIFY That Mary S DiRago was duly admitted to practice in said Court on (12/08/2004) and is in good standing as amember of the bar of said court.
+
+Dated at Chicago, Illinois on (01/29/2020 )
+
+Bruton , Clerk,
+
+By: Tina Lam Deputy Clerk

marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737265/EFTA02737265.metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,153 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737265.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 2,
+  "chars": 1263,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 0.66,
+  "image_assets": [
+    "_page_1_Picture_2.jpeg"
+  ],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "Certificate of Admission \nTo the Bar of Illinois",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            196.452,
+            112.59
+          ],
+          [
+            460.2667236328125,
+            112.59
+          ],
+          [
+            460.2667236328125,
+            166.19854736328125
+          ],
+          [
+            196.452,
+            166.19854736328125
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "CERTIFICATE OF GOOD STANDING",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            149.32799999999997,
+            53.46
+          ],
+          [
+            467.3410339355469,
+            53.46
+          ],
+          [
+            467.3410339355469,
+            74.53363037109375
+          ],
+          [
+            149.32799999999997,
+            74.53363037109375
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            165
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            19
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            6
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            104
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            16
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            8
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "Picture",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737265"
+  }
+}

marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737267/EFTA02737267.md

@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
+
+X Plaintiff, v. DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, as EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Defendants. X
+
+: Index No. 1:19-cv-10788-GHW-DCF
+
+## MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE
+
+Pursuant to Rule 1.3 of the Local Rules of the United States Courts for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York, Molly S. DiRago hereby moves this Court for an Order for admission to practice Pro Hac Vice to appear as counsel for Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn as Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (together, the "Co-Executors"), in the above-captioned action.
+
+I am in good standing of the bar(s) of the state of Illinois and there are no pending disciplinary proceedings against me in any state or federal court. I have never been convicted of a felony. I have never been censured, suspended, disbarred or denied admission or readmission by any court. I have attached the affidavit pursuant to Local Rule 1.3.
+
+Dated: February 13, 2020 Respectfully Submitted,
+
+Is/ Mary "Molly" S. DiRago
+
+Mary "Molly" S. DiRago (Pro Hac Vice Pending)
+
+Troutman Sanders LLP
+
+One North Wacker Drive, Suite 2905
+
+Chicago, 60606
+
+(312) 759-1926
+
+(312) 759-1939 (Fax)
+
+molly.dirago@troutman.com
+
+Attorneys for Defendants Darren K. Indyke and
+
+Richard D. Kahn, Co-Executors of the Estate of
+
+Jeffrey E. Epstein

marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737267/EFTA02737267.metadata.json

@@ -0,0 +1,143 @@
+{
+  "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737267.pdf",
+  "engine": {
+    "marker_major": "2",
+    "marker_version": "2.0.0",
+    "mode": "balanced",
+    "use_llm": false,
+    "force_ocr": false,
+    "disable_ocr": false,
+    "output_format": "markdown",
+    "preserve_source": false
+  },
+  "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
+  "pages": 2,
+  "chars": 1373,
+  "elapsed_seconds": 0.7,
+  "image_assets": [],
+  "marker_metadata": {
+    "table_of_contents": [
+      {
+        "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            68.544,
+            83.42999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            281.419189453125,
+            83.42999999999999
+          ],
+          [
+            281.419189453125,
+            112.10302734375
+          ],
+          [
+            68.544,
+            112.10302734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      },
+      {
+        "title": "MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE",
+        "heading_level": null,
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "polygon": [
+          [
+            182.37599999999998,
+            311.04
+          ],
+          [
+            430.1128845214844,
+            311.04
+          ],
+          [
+            430.1128845214844,
+            325.10302734375
+          ],
+          [
+            182.37599999999998,
+            325.10302734375
+          ]
+        ]
+      }
+    ],
+    "page_stats": [
+      {
+        "page_id": 0,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            47
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            23
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            4
+          ],
+          [
+            "SectionHeader",
+            2
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      },
+      {
+        "page_id": 1,
+        "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
+        "block_counts": [
+          [
+            "Span",
+            27
+          ],
+          [
+            "Line",
+            14
+          ],
+          [
+            "Text",
+            13
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageHeader",
+            1
+          ],
+          [
+            "PageFooter",
+            1
+          ]
+        ],
+        "block_metadata": {
+          "llm_request_count": 0,
+          "llm_error_count": 0,
+          "llm_tokens_used": 0,
+          "previous_text": "",
+          "previous_type": "",
+          "previous_order": 0
+        }
+      }
+    ],
+    "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737267"
+  }
+}