diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737217/EFTA02737217.md b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737217/EFTA02737217.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0db3df87a60cc2c233126dfbd0cdcac42d22f159 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737217/EFTA02737217.md @@ -0,0 +1,242 @@ +#### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK + +x + +Plaintiff, + +Case No. 19 Civ. 10788 + +### COMPLAINT -against- AND JURY DEMAND + +DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, as EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, + +Defendants. + +x + +Plaintiff ==, by and through her attorneys, Cuti Hecker Wang LLP and Allred, Maroko & Goldberg, for her Complaint alleges as follows: + +# NATURE OF THE ACTION + +1. When Plaintiff was just seventeen years old, living on her own and working full-time to support herself, Jeffrey Epstein preyed open her, manipulated her to be completely dependent on him, and sexually abused her. + +2. Epstein was presented to Teala as someone who had learned about her challenging circumstances and had the resources and interest to assist her — including by helping her to attend college and study abroad to see the world. Teala was introduced to Epstein by her sister, but Teala was unaware that Epstein had been manipulating and sexually abusing her sister, as Epstein's total power and control over Teala's sister made it impossible for her to say anything about it. + +3. During their early interactions, Epstein led Teala to believe that he would help her achieve her dream of becoming a translator, and he arranged for Teala to study abroad in Spain. Teala gave up her job and her apartment in anticipation of this life-changing opportunity, leaving her completely dependent on Epstein and his continuing generosity. + +4. Epstein exploited this power over seventeen-year-old Teala to sexually abuse her repeatedly. Ultimately, he raped and sexually assaulted her frequently and in a variety of places and settings, including by trafficking Teala to his homes in New York, New Mexico, Florida, the Virgin Islands, and France. He treated her like an object for his sexual gratification. + +5. These assaults caused Teala to feel completely intimidated and fearful. She froze up and began to cry, able to think only about trying to survive. + +6. Epstein continued to exert total control over Teala's life for two more years, trafficking her around the country and the world and sexually abusing her on a frequent basis. During this time, Teala felt deep despair and isolation, and developed a severe and selfdestructive eating disorder. Still within his power and control, Teala confided in Epstein about her disorder, mistakenly believing that she could trust him. Rather than help her, Epstein cast her out within hours of her admission, sending her back to a place where she no longer had a home, a job or any resources or support. + +7. Epstein's abuse destroyed life. She sank into alcoholism and other self-harm, unable to trust others but not understanding why. + +8. At the same time, like so many childhood sex abuse victims, she did not comprehend how it had undone her or her life, or how it impacted her. + +9. Now a working mother of three, is still just beginning to understand the depth of the injuries from the sexual assaults that Epstein inflicted on her beginning when she was seventeen. She feels the toll of Epstein's abuse every day. She feels dysfunctional, on-edge, overwhelmed, and like she is on the verge of a psychological breakdown. She has difficulty sleeping and often has flashbacks to Epstein's abuse. + +10. Epstein died in August 2019, before or the countless other girls he preyed upon could obtain a modicum of justice. + +I I. brings this action seeking, at last, some remedy for the egregious abuse that Epstein inflicted when she was a child. + +# PARTIES + +12. Plaintiff is an individual who resides in Arizona. + +13. Defendants Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn are the Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (the "Estate"). As Executors of the Estate, Defendants are liable for the acts and omissions of Epstein and his agents. For purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1332, Defendants Indyke and Kahn are deemed to be citizens of the United States Virgin Islands, where Epstein was domiciled at the time of his death. + +# JURISDICTION AND VENUE + +14. This Court has subject-matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332 because this case is between citizens of different states and the amount in controversy exceeds \$75,000. + +15. Venue is proper in this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 139I(bX2) because a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred in this District. + +16. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendants. As Executors of the Estate, Defendants Indyke and Kahn are subject to personal jurisdiction in this Court because Epstein was subject to personal jurisdiction at the time of his death. + +17. This Court had both specific and general personal jurisdiction over Epstein at the time of his death. + +18. Epstein resided in New York State a substantial portion of the time during the time period at issue in this lawsuit, and through the time of his death. + +19. Epstein resided in the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York County at the time of his death. + +20. Epstein conducted substantial business operations in New York. + +21. Epstein owned and/or controlled numerous companies with principal places of business in New York. + +22. Epstein owned substantial real property assets in New York, including the townhouse located at 9 East 7Ist Street in Manhattan, which is valued at \$55 million or more. + +23. New York was the epicenter of Epstein's criminal sex-trafficking enterprise. For years, Epstein and his agents took actions in New York in order to arrange for minor girls to be trafficked to his homes throughout the country in order to perform sexual acts for him. Epstein's trafficking and abuse of was part of that New York-based criminal enterprise. + +24. From his Manhattan townhouse, Epstein directed a vast network of agents in recruiting minor girls to be brought to him for his sexual use. + +25. Epstein sexually abused many minor girls, including in his Manhattan townhouse. + +26. On many occasions, Epstein and his agents made phone calls from New York to schedule appointments for minor girls to come to Epstein's residences outside of New York in order to perform commercial sexual acts for Epstein. + +27. Upon information and belief, Epstein and/or his agents were present in New York when they took various actions to facilitate the trafficking of for the purpose of performing sexual acts for Epstein. + +# JURY DEMAND + +28. Plaintiff hereby demands a trial by jury on all of her claims in this action. + +## FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS + +29. When Plaintiff was seventeen years old, Jeffrey Epstein preyed upon her, manipulating her to be completely dependent on him and then sexually assaulting and raping her on numerous occasions. Epstein continued this pattern of manipulation and frequent sexual assault for years, leaving with deep emotional wounds that she is still just beginning to grapple with. + +30. By age seventeen, Teala had already lived through tremendously challenging circumstances. At eleven years old, she was homeless for a year, staying with various friends and seeing her mother only about once a week. At fifteen, Teala began working in order to support herself. At sixteen, Teala's living situation was again unstable, and she moved to Los Angeles to live with her older sister. + +31. Teala initially tried to go to school in Los Angeles, but was unable to continue due to the need to work full-time to support herself. Teals lived with her sister and worked at a hair salon, eventually getting her GED. By the time Teala met Epstein, she had already been living on her own and working full-time for a year-and-a-half. + +32. Teala's sister — who is five years older than her — had previously met Epstein and traveled with him. Teala's sister described Epstein to her as a generous wealthy person, and reported that he often helped make it possible for people to attend college. Teala's sister reported that Epstein had heard Teala's story and that he wanted to help. + +33. Unbeknownst to Teals, Epstein had been manipulating and sexually abusing her sister. Teals had no idea that her sister had been involved in any type of sexual interactions with Epstein. Epstein's power and control of Teala's sister made it impossible for her to say anything. + +34. Teala met Epstein for the first time in 2002, when she was seventeen years old. Epstein was visiting Los Angeles, and Teala drove with her sister to meet him at the Hotel Bel-Air. + +35. During that first meeting, Epstein lay on a bed in his spacious hotel suite, fully clothed. He asked Teala's sister to massage his feet, then encouraged Teala to join her. Afterwards, Epstein took them shopping, and insisted on buying several items for Teala. + +36. After that meeting, Epstein kept in touch with Teala through frequent phone calls. Epstein veered the conversation toward Teala's career goals and how Epstein could help her achieve them. He purported to want to help her and guide her to a better life. + +37. Epstein offered to send Teala to school to learn hairdressing, but Teala made clear that this was not what she wanted to do in the long term. Teala explained that she had a passion for languages and for people, and that her dream was to be a translator. + +38. Epstein claimed that he wanted to help Teala study to become a translator. He suggested that he would pay for Teala to study in Spain for a semester. Soon after, Epstein helped her to obtain a letter of recommendation from her high school counselor and helped her get accepted to study at the University of Madrid. + +39. Teala was over the moon, feeling her dreams were coming true. Epstein made sure she felt that it was all his doing. + +40. Teala prepared for this exciting opportunity to study abroad and pursue her dream career. She gave notice at her hairdressing job and gave up her apartment in Los Angeles, preparing to move to Spain. + +41. Before Teala left for her school program, however, Epstein began what would become a long pattern of using her as his sexual object. + +42. In approximately the summer of 2002, Epstein flew Teala and her sister to his ranch in New Mexico. Teala felt no reason to be wary of Epstein. He had been kind in their first meeting and had acted with generosity towards her. + +43. When Teala got to Epstein's ranch, Epstein's close associates Ghislaine Maxwell and were there. Maxwell asked Teala questions about herself and took her horseback riding. invited Teals to go swimming. + +44. After Teala swam, Epstein asked her to go into a massage room along with began massaging Epstein, and Teala innocently joined in. as she had when her sister massaged Epstein's feet the first time. + +45. At that point, Epstein began fondling and took off shirt. Teala became very uncomfortable, as the massage had quickly and unexpectedly turned into a sexual encounter. Epstein reached inside Teala's bathing suit and fondled her genitals. Teals began crying, but Epstein continued to grope her as he masturbated to completion. + +46. Teals felt extremely vulnerable. Epstein had arranged the circumstances to ensure that Teala was completely at his mercy. Teala had given up her job and her apartment in order to travel to Spain at Epstein's expense. If Epstein decided to rethink his generosity at any point, Teala would have had nothing, and would have been left homeless and jobless once again, after being brought so close to her dream. Even though Epstein had preyed upon her and sexually assaulted her, Teala understood she had no choice but to submit to him. His power over her was all-encompassing. + +47. Epstein viciously exploited this power dynamic. In the summer and fall of 2002, he flew seventeen-year-old Teala to his homes in New York, Florida, and the U.S. Virgin Islands, sexually assaulting her in each of those locations. + +48. In or around December 2002, Epstein flew Teala to stay at his townhouse + +located at 9 East 71st Street in Manhattan. While they were in the dining room of the townhouse, Epstein without warning stuck his hand down Teala's pants and fondled her genitals. It was as if she were his toy. + +49. In or around that same month, at Epstein's home in Florida, Epstein crept into Teala's bedroom while she was sleeping and raped her. + +50. Also around that same month, at the private island Epstein owned in the Virgin Islands, Epstein ordered Teala to massage him, then proceeded to sexually assault her in the massage room. + +51. Teala finally traveled to Spain to study in or around the end of 2002. + +52. In early 2003, when Teala was still seventeen years old, Epstein flew her from Madrid to Paris. At his home in Paris, Epstein again crept into Teala's bedroom while she slept and raped her. + +53. When Epstein inflicted these sexual assaults on Teala, she felt completely intimidated and fearful. All she could think about was trying to survive. Her body froze up, and she began crying. + +54. After Teala's semester in Madrid, she had no home and no job. Instead, Epstein brought her to live a nomadic lifestyle in his close orbit. Teala traveled around the country with Epstein and his entourage, which generally included Maxwell, =, and others. Virtually every few days, Epstein would bring Teala to a different home of his, including his Manhattan townhouse and throughout the country, where he continued to sexually assault her on a frequent basis. Epstein regularly used his private planes to traffic Teala into various locations for his sexual abuse of her. + +55. Epstein had power over every aspect of Teala's life, and he had groomed Teala to be completely dependent on him and completely submissive to him. Epstein treated + +Teala as a sexual object, using her body for his sexual gratification frequently and at his whim. + +56. Eventually, by approximately 2004, Epstein arranged for Teala to live in an apartment at 301 East 66th Street in Manhattan, just blocks from his townhouse, when she was in New York. + +57. This pattern - of Epstein exercising total control over Teala's life and using her as a sexual object whenever he desired — continued throughout 2003 and 2004. Epstein arranged for Teala to study abroad two more times, apparently when he grew bored with having her around. Each time, Teala lived in this nomadic orbit with Epstein both before and after traveling to attend school. + +58. Epstein also tried to introduce Teala to his "friends" and essentially offer her as a sexual object to them. In one instance, Epstein had Teala spend time with a well-known Hollywood producer, who then demanded and attempted to engage in abusive sexual behavior. Teala barely escaped. + +59. By 2004, Teala felt deep despair and isolation. There was no one she could talk to about what Epstein was doing to her. Instead, Epstein had ensured that she thought he was the only person in her life whom she could trust. + +60. Teala developed a severe eating disorder, for the first time, in or around 2004. After she had struggled with the disorder for six months or a year, it became too much to bear. She confided in Epstein about the eating disorder, still manipulated into thinking he was someone she could trust. + +61. Instead, from the moment Epstein learned of Teala's self-destructive behavior, he immediately cast her out. Literally within hours of Teala anxiously confessing to Epstein that she did not know why, but had a compulsive need to binge and purge, he threw her out. He instructed her to pack up her belongings and arranged for her to be flown to Arizona. + +62. But there was nothing left for her in Arizona. She still had no idea what had happened to her and felt it was all her fault. + +63. Epstein's abuse destroyed Teala's life. After being cast out by him after two years of a lavish, if abusive, lifestyle, she sank into alcoholism and other self-harm, unable to trust others but not understanding why. + +64. is now a working mother raising three children. She is still struggling to put her life back together. + +65. is still in the nascent stages of understanding the deep and lasting injuries that Epstein's pattern of abuse has caused her, but she feels the effects every day. She feels dysfunctional, on-edge, and constantly overwhelmed. She has difficulty sleeping. She often has flashbacks to Epstein's sexual assaults. She feels like she is on the verge of a psychological breakdown. + +66. This action is timely under the law of each jurisdiction whose law might be determined to govern claims or aspects thereof, including without limitation New York, New Mexico, Florida, and the Virgin Islands. + +67. still has not disclosed her abuse to a licensed medical or mental health care provider in the context of receiving health care from the provider. + +68. is still just beginning to process and understand the full extent of the injuries that Epstein's abuse had caused her and the connection between Epstein's abuse and the emotional and psychological injuries she had experienced. + +69. This action is timely under New York law because it falls within New York CPLR 2I4-g and is brought during the one-year time period set forth in that section. The claims brought herein allege intentional and negligent acts and/or omissions for physical, psychological, and other injury suffered as a result of conduct that would constitute sexual + +offenses as defined in Article 130 of the New York Penal Law, and such acts and/or omissions were committed against when she was less than eighteen years of age. + +70. Epstein's conduct constitutes "childhood sexual abuse" within the meaning of New Mexico Stat. § 37-1-30 and "abuse" within the meaning of Florida Stat. § 95.11(7). + +## FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION (Battery) + +71. Plaintiff hereby incorporates each of the foregoing paragraphs as if fully set forth herein. + +72. In committing the acts described above, Epstein intentionally subjected Plaintiff to bodily contact that was offensive in nature. + +73. Epstein intentionally touched Plaintiff in a rude, insolent, or angry manner. + +74. As a result of Epstein's actions, Plaintiff suffered damages in an amount to be determined at trial. + +## SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION (Assault) + +75. Plaintiff hereby incorporates each of the foregoing paragraphs as if fully set forth herein. + +76. In committing the acts described above, Epstein engaged in physical conduct that placed Plaintiff in imminent apprehension that he would harm her. + +77. As a result of Epstein's actions, Plaintiff suffered damages in an amount to be determined at trial. + +#### THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION (Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress) + +78. Plaintiff hereby incorporates each of the foregoing paragraphs as if fully set forth herein. + +79. In committing the acts described above, Epstein engaged in extreme and outrageous conduct. + +80. In doing so, Epstein acted with the intent to cause and/or disregard of a substantial likelihood of causing Plaintiff to suffer severe emotional distress. + +81. As a direct result of Epstein's actions, Plaintiff suffered severe emotional distress. + +82. As a result of Epstein's actions, Plaintiff suffered damages in an amount to be determined at trial. + +WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that judgment be entered against Defendants as follows: + +- a. Awarding compensatory damages for all physical injuries, emotional distress, psychological harm, anxiety, humiliation, physical and emotional pain and suffering, family and social disruption, and other harm, in an amount to be determined at trial; +- b. Awarding punitive damages in an amount to be determined at trial; +- c. Awarding attorneys' fees and costs pursuant to any applicable statute or law; +- d. Awarding pre- and post-judgment interest on all such damages, fees and/or costs; +- e. Attaching all of Defendants' real property and other assets located in the State of New York pursuant to New York CPLR 6201 et seq. and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 64; and +- 1. Awarding such other and further relief as this Court may deem just and proper. + +Dated: New York, New York November 21, 2019 + +CUT! HECKER WANG LLP + +By: /s/ Mariann Meier Wang + +Mariann Meier Wang + +Daniel Mullkoff + +305 Broadway, Suite 607 + +New York, New York 10007 + +(212) 620-2603 + +mwang@chwIlp.com + +ALLRED, MAROKO & GOLDBERG + +Gloria Allred + +305 Broadway, Suite 607 + +New York, New York 10007 + +(212) 202-2966 + +Attorneys for Plaintiff \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737217/EFTA02737217.metadata.json b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737217/EFTA02737217.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3d1d6a18d258f917e38fec1ab6c5e4fd9e21e8b9 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737217/EFTA02737217.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,729 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737217.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 13, + "chars": 20200, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.89, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 71.17889404296875 + ], + [ + 282.1064147949219, + 71.17889404296875 + ], + [ + 282.1064147949219, + 98.68353271484375 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 98.68353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COMPLAINT \n-against- AND JURY DEMAND", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 143.5, + 163.62 + ], + [ + 481.60491943359375, + 163.62 + ], + [ + 481.60491943359375, + 191.68353271484375 + ], + [ + 143.5, + 191.68353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NATURE OF THE ACTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 227.66400000000002, + 349.92 + ], + [ + 384.78680419921875, + 349.92 + ], + [ + 384.78680419921875, + 364.93353271484375 + ], + [ + 227.66400000000002, + 364.93353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PARTIES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 277.236, + 123.93 + ], + [ + 335.94378662109375, + 123.93 + ], + [ + 335.94378662109375, + 138.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 277.236, + 138.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "JURISDICTION AND VENUE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 221.54399999999998, + 310.23 + ], + [ + 389.5322570800781, + 310.23 + ], + [ + 389.5322570800781, + 325.10302734375 + ], + [ + 221.54399999999998, + 325.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "JURY DEMAND", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.264, + 655.29 + ], + [ + 354.5192565917969, + 655.29 + ], + [ + 354.5192565917969, + 670.4830169677734 + ], + [ + 258.264, + 670.4830169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 229.5, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 384.37506103515625, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 384.37506103515625, + 85.56353759765625 + ], + [ + 229.5, + 85.56353759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION \n(Battery)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 227.66400000000002, + 203.31 + ], + [ + 383.56695556640625, + 203.31 + ], + [ + 383.56695556640625, + 232.10302734375 + ], + [ + 227.66400000000002, + 232.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION \n(Assault)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 219.70799999999997, + 455.22 + ], + [ + 391.0873718261719, + 455.22 + ], + [ + 391.0873718261719, + 484.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 219.70799999999997, + 484.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION \n(Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 189.108, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 423.3904724121094, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 423.3904724121094, + 98.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 189.108, + 98.9830322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 37 + ], + [ + "Line", + 19 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737217" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737230/EFTA02737230.md b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737230/EFTA02737230.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a30bbe86d634e97a2b6cf73688b69099cb848e41 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737230/EFTA02737230.md @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ +The JS-44 civil cover sheet and the information contained herein neither replace nor supplement the filing and service of pleadings or other papers as required by law, except as provided by local rules of court. This form, approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September 1974, is required for use of the Clerk of Court for the purpose of initiating the civil docket sheet. + +PLAINTIFFS + +![](_page_0_Picture_35.jpeg) + +DEFENDANTS + +DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, +as EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. + +EDGETIN- +ATTORNEYS (IF KNOWN) + +ATTORNEYS (FIRM NAME, ADDRESS, AND TELEPHONE NUMBER) + +Bennet J. Moskowitz, Troutman Sanders LLP +875 Third Avenue + +New York, NY 10002 (for Defendants Indyke and Kahn) + +CAUSE OF ACTION (CITE THE U.S. CIVIL STATUTE UNDER WHICH YOU ARE FILING AND WRITE A BRIEF STATEMENT OF CAUSE) +(DO NOT CITE JURISDICTIONAL STATUTES UNLESS DIVERSITY) + +28 USC 1332 + +Has this action, case, or proceeding, or one essentially the same been previously filed in SDNY at any time? No Yes Judge Previously Assigned + +If yes, was this case Vol. Invol. Dismissed. No Yes If yes, give date \_\_\_\_\_ & Case No. \_\_\_\_\_ + +IS THIS AN INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CASE? No Yes + +(PLACE AN [x] IN ONE BOX ONLY) NATURE OF SUIT + +| CONTRACT | PERSONAL INJURY | PERSONAL INJURY | FORFEITURE/PENALTY | BANKRUPTCY | OTHER STATUTES | +|-------------------------|----------------------------|--------------------------|-------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------|------------------------------| +| [ ] 110 INSURANCE | [ ] 310 AIRPLANE | [ ] 367 HEALTHCARE/ | [ ] 625 DRUG RELATED | [ ] 422 APPEAL | [ ] 375 FALSE CLAIMS | +| [ ] 120 MARINE | [ ] 315 AIRPLANE PRODUCT | PHARMACEUTICAL PERSONAL | [ ] 625 DRUG RELATED | [ ] 422 APPEAL | [ ] 375 QUI TAM | +| [ ] 130 ACT | [ ] 315 AIRPLANE PRODUCT | INJURY/PRODUCT LIABILITY | SEIZURE OF PROPERTY | [ ] 423 WITHDRAWAL | [ ] 400 STATE | +| [ ] 140 NEGOTIABLE | [ ] 320 ASSAULT, LIBEL & | LIABILITY | 21 USC 681 | [ ] 423 WITHDRAWAL | [ ] 400 STATE | +| [ ] 150 INSTRUMENT | [ ] 330 FEDERAL | PRODUCT LIABILITY | [ ] 690 OTHER | [ ] 430 BANKS & BANKING | [ ] 410 ANTITRUST | +| [ ] 150 RECOVERY OF | [ ] 330 FEDERAL | LIABILITY | [ ] 690 OTHER | [ ] 450 COMMERCE | [ ] 460 DEPORTATION | +| [ ] 151 ENFORCEMENT | [ ] 340 MARINE | PERSONAL PROPERTY | [ ] 820 COPYRIGHTS | [ ] 470 RACKETEER INFLU- | [ ] 480 CONSUMER CREDIT | +| [ ] 152 DEFAULTED | [ ] 345 MARINE PRODUCT | [ ] 370 OTHER FRAUD | [ ] 830 PATENT | [ ] 430 BANKS & BANKING | [ ] 470 RACKETEER INFLU- | +| [ ] 153 STUDENT LOANS | [ ] 355 MOTOR VEHICLE | [ ] 371 TRUTH IN LENDING | [ ] 835 PATENT-ABBREVIATED NEW DRUG APPLICATION | [ ] 830 PATENT | [ ] 480 CONSUMER CREDIT | +| [ ] 153 (EXCL VETERANS) | [ ] 360 OTHER PERSONAL | [ ] 370 OTHER FRAUD | [ ] 840 TRADEMARK | [ ] 850 SECURITIES/ | [ ] 480 CABLE/SATELLITE TV | +| [ ] 163 RECOVERY OF | [ ] 362 PERSONAL INJURY - | [ ] 380 OTHER PERSONAL | [ ] 851 FAMILY MEDICAL | [ ] 865 RSI (405(g)) | [ ] 850 SECURITIES/ | +| [ ] 160 STOCKHOLDERS | [ ] 362 PERSONAL INJURY - | [ ] 385 PROPERTY DAMAGE | [ ] 710 FAIR LABOR | [ ] 865 RSI (405(g)) | [ ] 850 SECURITIES/ | +| [ ] 190 SUITS | [ ] 355 MOTOR VEHICLE | PRODUCT LIABILITY | [ ] 720 LABOR/MGMT | [ ] 863 DIWC/DIWW (405(g)) | [ ] 850 SECURITIES/ | +| [ ] 190 OTHER | [ ] 365 MOTOR VEHICLE | PRISONER PETITIONS | [ ] 740 RAILWAY LABOR ACT | [ ] 864 SSID TITLE XVI | [ ] 890 OTHER STATUTORY | +| [ ] 195 CONTRACT | [ ] 362 PERSONAL INJURY - | [ ] 510 MOTIONS TO | [ ] 750 RAILWAY LABOR ACT | [ ] 865 RSI (405(g)) | [ ] 890 AGRICULTURAL ACTS | +| [ ] 195 CONTRACT | [ ] 362 PERSONAL INJURY - | [ ] 530 HABEAS CORPUS | [ ] 751 FAMILY MEDICAL | [ ] 870 TAXES (U.S. Plaintiff or | [ ] 893 ENVIRONMENTAL | +| [ ] 196 FRANCHISE | [ ] 362 PERSONAL INJURY - | [ ] 535 DEATH PENALTY | [ ] 791 EMPL RET INC | [ ] 871 IRS-THIRD PARTY | [ ] 893 FREEDOM OF | +| [ ] 196 FRANCHISE | [ ] 362 PERSONAL INJURY - | [ ] 540 MANDAMUS & OTHER | [ ] 791 EMPL RET INC | [ ] 871 IRS-THIRD PARTY | [ ] 893 ARBITRATION | +| [ ] 210 LAND | [ ] 440 OTHER CIVIL RIGHTS | [ ] 550 CIVIL RIGHTS | [ ] 462 NATURALIZATION | [ ] 871 IRS-THIRD PARTY | [ ] 893 ADMINISTRATIVE | +| [ ] 220 CONDEMNATION | [ ] 442 EMPLOYMENT | [ ] 550 CIVIL RIGHTS | [ ] 462 NATURALIZATION | [ ] 871 IRS-THIRD PARTY | [ ] 895 FREEDOM OF | +| [ ] 230 FORECLOSURE | [ ] 443 HOUSING/ | [ ] 555 PRISON CONDITION | [ ] 465 OTHER IMMIGRATION | [ ] 871 IRS-THIRD PARTY | [ ] 950 CONSTITUTIONALITY OF | +| [ ] 230 RENT LEASE & | [ ] 445 AMERICANS WITH | [ ] 560 CIVIL DETAINEE | [ ] 465 OTHER IMMIGRATION | [ ] 970 CONSTITUTIONALITY OF | [ ] 950 CONSTITUTIONALITY OF | +| [ ] 240 EJECTMENT | [ ] 446 AMERICANS WITH | [ ] 560 CIVIL DETAINEE | [ ] 465 OTHER IMMIGRATION | [ ] 970 CONSTITUTIONALITY OF | [ ] 950 CONSTITUTIONALITY OF | +| [ ] 245 TORTS TO LAND | [ ] 446 AMERICANS WITH | [ ] 560 CIVIL DETAINEE | [ ] 465 OTHER IMMIGRATION | [ ] 970 CONSTITUTIONALITY OF | [ ] 950 CONSTITUTIONALITY OF | +| [ ] 245 TORT PRODUCT | [ ] 446 AMERICANS WITH | [ ] 560 CIVIL DETAINEE | [ ] 465 OTHER IMMIGRATION | [ ] 970 CONSTITUTIONALITY OF | [ ] 950 CONSTITUTIONALITY OF | +| [ ] 245 LIABILITY | [ ] 446 AMERICANS WITH | [ ] 560 CIVIL DETAINEE | [ ] 465 OTHER IMMIGRATION | [ ] 970 CONSTITUTIONALITY OF | [ ] 950 CONSTITUTIONALITY OF | +| [ ] 290 ALL OTHER | [ ] 448 EDUCATION | [ ] 448 EDUCATION | [ ] 468 EDUCATION | [ ] 970 CONSTITUTIONALITY OF | [ ] 950 CONSTITUTIONALITY OF | +| [ ] 290 REAL PROPERTY | [ ] 448 EDUCATION | [ ] 448 EDUCATION | [ ] 468 EDUCATION | [ ] 970 CONSTITUTIONALITY OF | [ ] 950 CONSTITUTIONALITY OF | + +Check if demanded in complaint: + + CHECK IF THIS IS A CLASS ACTION +UNDER F.R.C.P. 23 + +DO YOU CLAIM THIS CASE IS RELATED TO A CIVIL CASE NOW PENDING IN S.D.N.Y. +AS DEFINED BY LOCAL RULE FOR DIVISION OF BUSINESS 13? +IF SO, STATE: + + 1 Original Proceeding 2 Removed from State Court 3 Remained from Appellate Court 4 Reinstated or Reopened 5 Transferred from (Specify District) 6 Multidistrict Litigation (Transferred) 7 Appeal to District Judge from Magistrate Judge + + a. all parties represented + + b. At least one party is pro se. + + 8 Multidistrict Litigation (Direct File) + +## (PLACE AN x IN ONE BOX ONLY) BASIS OF JURISDICTION + +O 1 U.S. PLAINTIFF O 2 U.S. DEFENDANT 0 3 FEDERAL QUESTION 04 DIVERSITY (U.S. NOT A PARTY) + +IF DIVERSITY, INDICATE CITIZENSHIP BELOW. + +## CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES (FOR DIVERSITY CASES ONLY) + +(Place an po in one box for Plaintiff and one box for Defendant) + +| | PTF | DEF | | PTF DEF | | | | +|--------------------------|------|-------|---------------------------------|-------------|----------------------------------|-------|-----| +| CITIZEN OF THIS STATE | [ I | [ II | CITIZEN OR SUBJECT OF A | (13(13 | | | | +| CITIZEN OF ANOTHER STATE | bg 2 | (34 2 | INCORPORATED or PRINCIPAL PLACE | [ ] 4 [ 3 4 | FOREIGN NATION | | | +| | | | | | | PTF | DEF | +| | | | | | INCORPORATED and PRINCIPAL PLACE | [ ] 5 | ( 5 | + +PLAINTIFFS) ADDRESS(ES) AND COUNTY(IES) + +Plaintiff is a resident of Arizona Go Cuti Hecker Wang LLP, 305 Broadway, Suite 607, New York, NY 10007. + +DEFENDANT(S) ADDRESS(ES) AND COUNTY(IES) + +Defendants Indyke and Kahn are residents of the U.S. Virgin Islands. + +DEFENDANT(S) ADDRESS UNKNOWN + +REPRESENTATION IS HEREBY MADE THAT, AT THIS TIME, I HAVE BEEN UNABLE, WITH REASONABLE DILIGENCE, TO ASCERTAIN THE RESIDENCE ADDRESSES OF THE FOLLOWING DEFENDANTS: + +Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn are sued as executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein. Per 28 USC 1332, Defendants are deemed citizens of the U.S. Virgin Islands, the domicile of decedent Epstein. Defendants' residential addresses are unknown to Plaintiff. Defendants' counsel is listed above. + +## COURTHOUSE ASSIGNMENT + +I hereby certify that this case should be assigned to the courthouse indicated below pursuant to Local Rule for Division of Business 18, 20 or 21. + +Check one: THIS ACTION SHOULD BE ASSIGNED TO: 0 PLAINS El MANHATTAN + +DATE 11/21/2019 SIGNATURE OF ATTORNEY OF RECO + +RECEIPT # + +Magistrate Judge is to be designated by the Clerk of the Court. + +ADMITTED TO PRACTICE IN THIS DISTRICT + +[ ] NO (i YES (DATE ADMITTED Mo.09 Yr. 1997 ) Attorney Bar Code M MW7417 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737230/EFTA02737230.metadata.json b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737230/EFTA02737230.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..490491b7c1458b4d6a4a72ee108c19100c5b49cd --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737230/EFTA02737230.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,203 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737230.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 10253, + "elapsed_seconds": 61.06, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_0_Picture_35.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "CIVIL COVER SHEET", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 256.428, + 24.299999999999997 + ], + [ + 359.24399999999997, + 24.299999999999997 + ], + [ + 359.24399999999997, + 35.64 + ], + [ + 256.428, + 35.64 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "(PLACE AN x IN ONE BOX ONLY) BASIS OF JURISDICTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 31.270000457763672, + 117.44999999999999 + ], + [ + 378.916259765625, + 117.44999999999999 + ], + [ + 378.916259765625, + 129.36590576171875 + ], + [ + 31.270000457763672, + 129.36590576171875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES (FOR DIVERSITY CASES ONLY)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.984, + 162.0 + ], + [ + 480.55828857421875, + 162.0 + ], + [ + 480.55828857421875, + 174.14999999999998 + ], + [ + 141.984, + 174.14999999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COURTHOUSE ASSIGNMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 251.53199999999998, + 547.5600000000001 + ], + [ + 382.16888427734375, + 547.5600000000001 + ], + [ + 382.16888427734375, + 559.8659210205078 + ], + [ + 251.53199999999998, + 559.8659210205078 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 48 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Table", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 134 + ], + [ + "Line", + 62 + ], + [ + "Text", + 23 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Form", + 1 + ], + [ + "Table", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737230" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737230/_page_0_Picture_35.jpeg b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737230/_page_0_Picture_35.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5dfea82e9fb63745106c6f516b73a9e613eccdf9 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737230/_page_0_Picture_35.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:954f4fc9f6d296842e75b98f60c0e041350c7dc9a30c192fe5806e28c88e5299 +size 1246 diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737232/EFTA02737232.md b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737232/EFTA02737232.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ac25a8fa326d0f88eef88ca309fd904bce80a4e1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737232/EFTA02737232.md @@ -0,0 +1,63 @@ +## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT + +for the + +Southern District of New York + +Plaintiffs) + +v. + +DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, as EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, + +Defendant(s) + +Civil Action No. 19 Civ. 10788 + +## SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION + +To: (Defendant's name and address) Darren K. Indyke do Bennet J. Moskowitz, attorney Troutman Sanders LLP 875 Third Avenue New York, NY 10002 + +A lawsuit has been filed against you. + +Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 (aX2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiffs attorney, whose name and address are: Mariann Meier Wang + +Cuti Hecker Wang LLP 305 Broadway, Suite 607 New York, New York 10007 + +If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. You also must file your answer or motion with the court. + +Date: + +CLERK OF COURT + +Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk + +Civil Action No. 19 Civ. 10788 + +## PROOF OF SERVICE + +(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (1)) + +This summons for (name of individual and title, if any) was received by me on (date) + +O I personally served the summons on the individual at (place) on (date) ; or + +O I left the summons at the individual's residence or usual place of abode with (name) , a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there, on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual's last known address; or + +❑ I served the summons on (name of individual) designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization) on (date) or , who is + +O I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or + +O Other (specify): + +My fees are \$ for travel and \$ for services, for a total of \$ 0.00 + +I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true. + +Date: Server's signature + +Additional information regarding attempted service, etc: + +Printed name and title + +Server's address \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737232/EFTA02737232.metadata.json b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737232/EFTA02737232.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7e57a249702026493adcd0880690f0820f0061da --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737232/EFTA02737232.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,170 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737232.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2270, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.03, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 169.524, + 60.75 + ], + [ + 443.8427429199219, + 60.75 + ], + [ + 443.8427429199219, + 83.17822265625 + ], + [ + 169.524, + 83.17822265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 219.70799999999997, + 294.03 + ], + [ + 391.9696350097656, + 294.03 + ], + [ + 391.9696350097656, + 308.8305969238281 + ], + [ + 219.70799999999997, + 308.8305969238281 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PROOF OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 248.47200000000004, + 87.48 + ], + [ + 362.36480712890625, + 87.48 + ], + [ + 362.36480712890625, + 100.97406005859375 + ], + [ + 248.47200000000004, + 100.97406005859375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737232" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737234/EFTA02737234.md b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737234/EFTA02737234.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3ac6515b47aeeb9a16c8e99f88a9e203d68293c7 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737234/EFTA02737234.md @@ -0,0 +1,63 @@ +## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT + +for the + +Southern District of New York + +Plaintiffs) + +v. + +DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, as EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, + +Defendant(s) + +Civil Action No. 19 Civ. 10788 + +## SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION + +To: (Defendant's name and address) Richard D. Kahn do Bennet J. Moskowitz, attorney Troutman Sanders LLP 875 Third Avenue New York, NY 10002 + +A lawsuit has been filed against you. + +Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 (aX2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiffs attorney, whose name and address are: Mariann Meier Wang + +Cuti Hecker Wang LLP 305 Broadway, Suite 607 New York, New York 10007 + +If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. You also must file your answer or motion with the court. + +Date: + +CLERK OF COURT + +Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk + +Civil Action No. 19 Civ. 10788 + +## PROOF OF SERVICE + +(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (1)) + +This summons for (name of individual and title. if any) was received by me on (date) + +O I personally served the summons on the individual at (place) on (date) ; or + +O I left the summons at the individual's residence or usual place of abode with (name) , a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there, on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual's last known address; or + +O I served the summons on (name of individual) designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization) on (date) or , who is + +O I returned the summons unexecuted because or + +O Other ( spec)fr): + +My fees are \$ for travel and \$ for services, for a total of \$ 0.00 + +I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true. + +Date: Server's signature + +Additional information regarding attempted service, etc: + +Printed name and title + +Server's address \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737234/EFTA02737234.metadata.json b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737234/EFTA02737234.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..84b536b889a93469282b716694495885e9f7e11b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737234/EFTA02737234.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,170 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737234.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2268, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.04, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 170.13600000000002, + 60.75 + ], + [ + 443.8427429199219, + 60.75 + ], + [ + 443.8427429199219, + 83.17822265625 + ], + [ + 170.13600000000002, + 83.17822265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 220.32, + 294.03 + ], + [ + 391.9696350097656, + 294.03 + ], + [ + 391.9696350097656, + 308.8305969238281 + ], + [ + 220.32, + 308.8305969238281 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PROOF OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 249.08399999999997, + 87.48 + ], + [ + 363.4100036621094, + 87.48 + ], + [ + 363.4100036621094, + 100.7005615234375 + ], + [ + 249.08399999999997, + 100.7005615234375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737234" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737236/EFTA02737236.md b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737236/EFTA02737236.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cee6de8b5809c78c16c88a6b365b80c087aa4675 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737236/EFTA02737236.md @@ -0,0 +1,95 @@ +# UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT + +for the + +Southern District of New York + +![](_page_0_Picture_131.jpeg) + +*Plaintiff(s)* + +v. + +DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, +as EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. +EPSTEIN, + +*Defendant(s)* + +) +) +) +) +) +) +) +) +) +) +) +) +) +) +) +) + +Civil Action No. 19 Civ. 10788 + +## SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION + +To: (*Defendant's name and address*) Darren K. Indyke +c/o Bennet J. Moskowitz, attorney +Troutman Sanders LLP +875 Third Avenue +New York, NY 10002 + +A lawsuit has been filed against you. + +Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff's attorney, whose name and address are: + +Mariann Meier Wang +Cuti Hecker Wang LLP +305 Broadway, Suite 607 +New York, New York 10007 + +If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. You also must file your answer or motion with the court. + +CLERK OF COURT + +Date: 11/22/2019 + +/s/ J. [REDACTED] + +![]()*Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk* + +Civil Action No. 19 Civ. 10788 + +## PROOF OF SERVICE + +(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (I)) + +This summons for (name of individual and title. if any) was received by me on (date) + +O I personally served the summons on the individual at (place) on (date) ; or + +O I left the summons at the individual's residence or usual place of abode with (name) , a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there, on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual's last known address; or + +O I served the summons on (name of individual) designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization) on (date) or , who is + +O I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or + +O Other (specify): + +My fees are \$ for travel and \$ for services, for a total of \$ 0.00 + +I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true. + +Date: + +Additional information regarding attempted service, etc: + +Server's signature + +Printed name and title + +Server's address \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737236/EFTA02737236.metadata.json b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737236/EFTA02737236.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6a3b4b5bdb5dc1b3bccab76c50c2123663f6486b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737236/EFTA02737236.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,176 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737236.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2429, + "elapsed_seconds": 6.49, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_0_Picture_131.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 169.524, + 62.37 + ], + [ + 440.02799999999996, + 62.37 + ], + [ + 440.02799999999996, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 169.524, + 81.0 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 220.93199999999996, + 295.65 + ], + [ + 388.00800000000004, + 295.65 + ], + [ + 388.00800000000004, + 307.79999999999995 + ], + [ + 220.93199999999996, + 307.79999999999995 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PROOF OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 249.08399999999997, + 87.48 + ], + [ + 363.4100036621094, + 87.48 + ], + [ + 363.4100036621094, + 100.7005615234375 + ], + [ + 249.08399999999997, + 100.7005615234375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Text", + 37 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737236" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737236/_page_0_Picture_131.jpeg b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737236/_page_0_Picture_131.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6eb9058caa48786df97d4f941f23115550de5e47 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737236/_page_0_Picture_131.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:1c947ca641083e89d5d9d3487d39cef2672e5bf1fd6a3ddef96636ceea755b1a +size 1396 diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737238/EFTA02737238.md b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737238/EFTA02737238.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ab5c0c0934e23f88d1755707e620841bfe21b6fa --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737238/EFTA02737238.md @@ -0,0 +1,63 @@ +## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT + +for the + +Southern District of New York + +Plaintifils) + +v. + +DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, as EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, + +Defendant(s) + +Civil Action No. 19 Civ. 10788 + +## SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION + +To: (Defendant's name and address) Richard D. Kahn do Bennet J. Moskowitz, attorney Troutman Sanders LLP 875 Third Avenue New York, NY 10002 + +A lawsuit has been filed against you. + +Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 (aX2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiffs attorney, whose name and address are: Mariann Meier Wang + +Cuti Hecker Wang LLP 305 Broadway, Suite 607 New York, New York 10007 + +If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. You also must file your answer or motion with the court. + +CLERK OF COURT + +Date: 11/22/2019 /s/ J. + +Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk + +Civil Action No. 19 Civ. 10788 + +## PROOF OF SERVICE + +(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (1)) + +This summons for (name of individual and title. if any) was received by me on (date) + +O I personally served the summons on the individual at (place) on (date) ; or + +O I left the summons at the individual's residence or usual place of abode with (name) , a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there, on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual's last known address; or + +O I served the summons on (name of individual) designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization) on (date) or , who is + +O I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or + +O Other (specify): + +My fees are \$ for travel and \$ for services, for a total of \$ 0.00 + +I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true. + +Date: Server's signature + +Additional information regarding attempted service, etc + +Printed name and title + +Server's address \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737238/EFTA02737238.metadata.json b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737238/EFTA02737238.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d297159915d6becb9a31faaefb33f7dd747246e1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737238/EFTA02737238.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,170 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737238.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2287, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.1, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 170.13600000000002, + 60.16986083984375 + ], + [ + 444.3945617675781, + 60.16986083984375 + ], + [ + 444.3945617675781, + 83.17822265625 + ], + [ + 170.13600000000002, + 83.17822265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 220.32, + 294.03 + ], + [ + 391.9696350097656, + 294.03 + ], + [ + 391.9696350097656, + 308.8305969238281 + ], + [ + 220.32, + 308.8305969238281 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PROOF OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 248.47200000000004, + 87.48 + ], + [ + 362.765869140625, + 87.48 + ], + [ + 362.765869140625, + 101.34405517578125 + ], + [ + 248.47200000000004, + 101.34405517578125 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737238" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737240/EFTA02737240.md b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737240/EFTA02737240.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7dbb2e05d67d0d39f2abba086c18cb92a68ac1a8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737240/EFTA02737240.md @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@ +## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK + +x + +Case No. 19 Civ. 10788 (GFIW) + +Plaintiff, + +## NOTICE OF APPEARANCE + +-against- + +DARREN INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, as EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, + +Defendants. + +x + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Gloria Allred of Allred, Maroko & Goldberg hereby appears as counsel for Plaintiff in the above-entitled action and requests that all filings and correspondence be served as follows: + +Gloria Allred ALLRED, MAROKO & GOLDBERG 305 Broadway, Suite 607 New York, New York 10007 (212) 202-2966 gallred@amglaw.com + +Dated: November 22, 2019 + +New York, New York ALLRED, MAROKO & GOLDBERG + +By: /s/ Gloria Allred Gloria Allred (GA0682) + +305 Broadway, Suite 607 New York, New York 10007 (212) 202-2966 gallred@amglaw.com + +Attorneys for Plaintiff \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737240/EFTA02737240.metadata.json b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737240/EFTA02737240.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..efb68d904b36eac3019d479c9a509196a777b01c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737240/EFTA02737240.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,105 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737240.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 804, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.96, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 281.8328552246094, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 281.8328552246094, + 98.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 98.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF APPEARANCE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 356.18399999999997, + 164.43 + ], + [ + 515.5772094726562, + 164.43 + ], + [ + 515.5772094726562, + 179.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 356.18399999999997, + 179.2330322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737240" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737241/EFTA02737241.md b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737241/EFTA02737241.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7f0fdc48a36bec4f5c9594e47509a5abb274362e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737241/EFTA02737241.md @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@ +## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK + +x + +Case No. 19 Civ. 10788 (GFIW) + +Plaintiff, + +## NOTICE OF APPEARANCE + +-against- + +DARREN INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, as EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, + +Defendants. + +x + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Daniel Mullkoff of Cuti Hecker Wang LLP hereby appears as counsel for Plaintiff in the above-entitled action and requests that all filings and correspondence be served as follows: + +Daniel Mullkoff (dmullkoff@chwIlp.com) Cuti Hecker Wang LLP 305 Broadway, Suite 607 New York, NY 10007 212-620-2606 (telephone) 212-620-2616 (fax) + +Dated: November 22, 2019 + +New York, New York CUTI HECICER WANG LLP + +By: /s/ Daniel Mullkoff Daniel Mullkoff (DM 5557) + +305 Broadway, Suite 607 New York, New York 10007 (212) 620-2606 dmullkoff@chwIlp.com + +Attorneys for Plaintiff \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737241/EFTA02737241.metadata.json b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737241/EFTA02737241.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5cc7a30b5b2b5831d9d3f8798378dc3fb74175a0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737241/EFTA02737241.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,105 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737241.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 828, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.79, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 281.8328552246094, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 281.8328552246094, + 98.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 98.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF APPEARANCE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 356.18399999999997, + 164.43 + ], + [ + 515.5772094726562, + 164.43 + ], + [ + 515.5772094726562, + 179.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 356.18399999999997, + 179.2330322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737241" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737242/EFTA02737242.md b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737242/EFTA02737242.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e35d738a87bf4d0e9fb38cf52b01afe2b9145135 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737242/EFTA02737242.md @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@ +## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK + +Plaintiff, : -against-DARREN INDUCE, as Executor of the Estate : of Jeffrey E. Epstein, and RICHARD D. KAHN : as Executor of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, : Defendants. : USDC SDNY DOCUMENT I tlECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: 11/22/2019 + +1:19-cv-10788-GHW + +## ORDER REFERRING CASE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE + +The above entitled action is referred to a United States magistrate judge for the following purpose: + +X General pretrial (includes scheduling, discovery, non-dispositive pretrial motions, and settlement) + +Specific non-dispositive motion/dispute: + +If referral is for discovery disputes when the District Judge is unavailable, the time period of the referral: + +Settlement + +Inquest after default/damages hearing + +Consent under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) for all purposes (including trial) + +SO ORDERED. + +Date: November 22, 2019 New York, New York Consent under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) for limited purpose (e.g., dispositive motion, preliminary injunction) Purpose: + +Habeas corpus Social Security + +Dispositive motion (it, motion requiring Report and Recommendation) + +Particular motion: + +All such motions: + +GRE United States District Judge \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737242/EFTA02737242.metadata.json b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737242/EFTA02737242.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7b64a14e9a8d1912264c3aa3b88e2a18b73dc6bf --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737242/EFTA02737242.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,109 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737242.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1195, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.04, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.156, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 282.9630126953125, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 282.9630126953125, + 99.2335205078125 + ], + [ + 69.156, + 99.2335205078125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER REFERRING CASE \nTO MAGISTRATE JUDGE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 364.14, + 180.4381103515625 + ], + [ + 513.456298828125, + 180.4381103515625 + ], + [ + 513.456298828125, + 206.853515625 + ], + [ + 364.14, + 206.853515625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 90 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737242" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737243/EFTA02737243.md b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737243/EFTA02737243.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d36e32dae8525d97b86914f03fb6e16a963b593a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737243/EFTA02737243.md @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +Bennet J. Moskowitz + +bennetmoskowitz@troutman.com + +December 4, 2019 + +ECF + +Hon. GmcsH. Daniel Moynihan United States Courthouse 500 Pearl St. New York, NY 10007-1312 + +Re: v. Darren. lndyke and Richard D. Kahn, as Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, 1:19-cv-10788 (GHW) (DCF) + +Dear Judge + +We represent Defendants Darren'. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (together, "Defendants"), in the referenced action. We write to respectfully request the Court's approval of the parties' agreement that Defendants have through January 20, 2020 to answer, move or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF No. 1). + +There have been no prior requests for adjournments or extensions in this action. The parties have also agreed to proceed with a Rule 26(f) conference on January 7, 2020 at 10AM. + +Thank you for your attention to this matter. + +Respectfully submitted, + +siBennet J. Moskowitz Bennet J. Moskowitz \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737243/EFTA02737243.metadata.json b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737243/EFTA02737243.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..dbf6e660cfce670846570f9ea69f045d89d459a9 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737243/EFTA02737243.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,58 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737243.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 953, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.77, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737243" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737244/EFTA02737244.md b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737244/EFTA02737244.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3b54304e4279f833668d0f4295ba0b92d709265f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737244/EFTA02737244.md @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@ +# MEMORANDUM ENDORSED + +Deniel Moskowitz @ toutman.com + +Toutman Sanders LLP +875 Third Avenue +New York, New York 10022 +toutman.com + +DATE FILED: 12/5/2019 +DOC #: +ELECTRONICALLY FILED +DOCUMENT +FILED 12/05/19 + +# MEMORANDUM ENDORSED + +December 4, 2019 + +ECF + +Hon. Gerary H. [REDACTED] +Daniel [REDACTED] Moynihan +United States Courthouse +500 Pearl St. +New York, NY 10007-1312 + +Re: [REDACTED] V. Darren [REDACTED] Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, as Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, "Defendants", in the referenced action. We write to respectfully request the Court's approval of the parties' agreement that Defendants have through January 20, 2020 to answer, move or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF No. 1). There have been no prior requests for adjournments or extensions in this action. The parties have also agreed to proceed with a Rule 26(f) conference on January 7, 2020 at 10AM. Thank you for your attention to this matter. + +Respectfully submitted, + +Bennet J. Moskowitz +*s/Bennet J. Moskowitz* + +The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion pending at Date No. 10. + +Dated: December 5, 2019 + +SO ORDERED. + +United States District Judge + +GREGORY H. [REDACTED] + +[REDACTED] \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737244/EFTA02737244.metadata.json b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737244/EFTA02737244.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e110713bebd3c09e282ff0f8f88e3bd40918c4d8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737244/EFTA02737244.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,109 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737244.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1222, + "elapsed_seconds": 13.8, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "MEMORANDUM ENDORSED", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 15.3, + 669.87 + ], + [ + 238.06800000000004, + 669.87 + ], + [ + 238.06800000000004, + 686.0699999999999 + ], + [ + 15.3, + 686.0699999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MEMORANDUM ENDORSED", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 15.3, + 669.87 + ], + [ + 115.05599999999998, + 669.87 + ], + [ + 115.05599999999998, + 686.0699999999999 + ], + [ + 15.3, + 686.0699999999999 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 33 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737244" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737245/EFTA02737245.md b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737245/EFTA02737245.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..93f2b2b18166ac4eb7e4e7a76830bf770509976a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737245/EFTA02737245.md @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +Bennet J. Moskowitz bennet.moskowitz@troutman.com + +December 5, 2019 + +ECF + +The Honorable Judge Debra Freeman Magistrate Judge United States District Court Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 + +Re: v. Darren'. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, as Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, 1:19-cv-10788 (GHW) (DCF) + +Dear Judge Freeman: + +We represent Defendants Darren,. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (together, "Defendants"), in the referenced action. We write to respectfully request the Court's approval of the parties' agreement that Defendants have through January 20, 2020 to answer, move or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF No. 1). + +There have been no prior requests for adjournments or extensions in this action. The parties have also agreed to proceed with a Rule 26(f) conference on January 7, 2020 at 10AM. + +Thank you for your attention to this matter. + +Respectfully submitted, + +s/Bennet J. Moskowitz Bennet J. Moskowitz \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737245/EFTA02737245.metadata.json b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737245/EFTA02737245.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4f4cb780ddb936f4a5810e9d9f5eb1ef052f2bbe --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737245/EFTA02737245.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,58 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737245.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1018, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.73, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737245" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737246/EFTA02737246.md b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737246/EFTA02737246.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d1e720fe2c8726a6ee15e2811c2f64ebc5365220 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737246/EFTA02737246.md @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +Bennet J. Moskowitz bennet.moskowitz@troutman.com + +January 10, 2020 + +ECF + +Hon. Debra C. Freeman Daniel Moynihan United States Courthouse 500 Pearl St. New York, NY 10007 + +Re: Jane Doe 15, 1:19-cv-10653-PAE-DCF; Mary Doe, 1:19-cv-10758-PAE-DCF; 1:19-cv-10788-GHW-DCF + +Dear Judge Freeman: + +We represent Defendants Darren,. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein to ether "Defendants"; and Defendants together with Plaintiffs Jane Doe 15, Mary Doe, and , the "Parties") in the referenced actions. Pursuant to the Court's direction at the initial conference, we write on behalf of all Parties to report to the Court regarding status on these actions. + +First, with respect to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program (the "Program"), Plaintiffs' counsel in these actions have reviewed the Program's protocol and begun to propose substantive changes to it and to confer with the Program's designers and administrator, and are considering whether their clients will participate. + +Second, with respect to the litigation of these three actions, the Parties conducted their Rule 26(f) conference by telephone yesterday, and are proceeding to finalize stipulations with respect to anonymity (to the extent that is relevant, for two of the three actions) and a Protective Order; the Parties further agree to exchange initial disclosures by January 23, 2020, proposed discovery schedules by January 301h, and then to propose a jointly agreed upon (or, absent an agreement, our alternate proposals) to Your Honor by February 6, 2020. + +Respectfully submitted, + +s/Bennet J. Moskowitz Bennet J. Moskowitz \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737246/EFTA02737246.metadata.json b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737246/EFTA02737246.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6a6e011ada07ea5af463f300a2f638a7b2157f46 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737246/EFTA02737246.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,58 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737246.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1626, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.78, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 81 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737246" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737247/EFTA02737247.md b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737247/EFTA02737247.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7dd328d51b1ea203f0ff40dac150b45fefbf436e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737247/EFTA02737247.md @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ +The Clerk of Court of the Southern District of New York is directed to docket the within ORDER in each of the following actions: + +![](_page_0_Picture_15.jpeg) + +VE v. Nine East 71st Street et al., No. 1:19-cv-07625 (AJN) (DF) + +Katlyn Doe v. Indyke et at, No. 1:19-cv-07771 (PKC) (DF) + +Priscilla Doe v. Indyke et at, No. 1:19-cv-07772 (ALC) (DF) + +Lisa Doe v. Indyke et al., No. 1:19-cv-07773 (ER) (DF) + +Jane Doe v. Indyke et at, No. 1:19-cv-08673 (KPF) (DF) + +v. Indyke et al., No. 1:19-cv-10475 (LGS) (DF) + +v. Indyke et at, No. 1:19-cv-10476 (PGG) (DF) + +v. Indyke et at, No. 1:19-cv-10479 (ALC) (DF) + +Jane Doe 1000 v. Indyke et at, No. 1:19-cv-10577 (LGS) (DF) + +Jane Doe 15 v. Indyke et al., No. I :19-cv-10653 (PAE) (DF) + +Mary Doe v. Indyke et at, No. 1:19-cv-I 0758 (PAE) (DF) + +v. Indyke et at, No. 1:19-cv-10788 (GHW) (DF) + +Anastasia Doe v. Indyke et at, No. 1:19-cv-11869 (AJN) (DF) + +## DEBRA FREEMAN, United States Magistrate Judge: + +The above-referenced cases — all brought by plaintiffs claiming that they were sexually abused by Jeffrey Epstein and seeking damages from his estate — have been neither consolidated for any purpose, nor designated as "related" by the Court. Nonetheless, these cases (together with certain other, similar cases, not listed above) have been referred to the undersigned for general pretrial supervision, so that discovery — and potentially settlement — may be coordinated as reasonable. While, at the parties' request, discovery in the other Jeffrey Epstein cases referred to this Court has been stayed pending a further report on the parties' settlement efforts, the parties to each of the above-referenced cases have requested, by submissions dated January 10, 2020, that this Court set a discovery schedule. This Court's having reviewed the parties' submissions, it is hereby ORDERED that: + +1. In each of the above-referenced cases in which the parties have not yet submitted a jointly proposed discovery plan pursuant to Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties are directed to submit a proposed discovery schedule for this Court's review no later + +than February 6, 2020. This submission should address all of the matters set out in Rule 26(f)(3), and should specifically include proposed deadlines for: + +- a service of initial disclosures under Rule 26(a)(1); +- b. service of initial document requests and interrogatories; +- c. any motion for joinder of other parties or amendment of the pleadings; +- d. completion of fact discovery; and +- e. expert disclosures and the completion of expert discovery, if any. + +2. As to each of the above-referenced cases, this Court will hold a pretrial conference pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on February 11, 2020, at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom 17A at the United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007. The parties should be aware, however, that the mere fact that this Court will be holding a single, joint case-management conference does not necessarily mean that this Court will set an identical discovery schedule in each case. At the conference, counsel should be prepared to address whether there are reasons why these cases should be treated differently for scheduling purposes. + +Dated: New York, New York January 14, 2019 + +SO ORDERED + +Ahles A9-7 DEBRA FREEMAN United States Magistrate Judge + +Copies to: + +All counsel in the above-referenced cases (via ECF) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737247/EFTA02737247.metadata.json b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737247/EFTA02737247.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6778cc036fd8c67cbc9f1d9a28f684853ebad95a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737247/EFTA02737247.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,134 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737247.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 3407, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.24, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_0_Picture_15.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "DEBRA FREEMAN, United States Magistrate Judge:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 336.15 + ], + [ + 350.9979553222656, + 336.15 + ], + [ + 350.9979553222656, + 352.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 352.4830322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737247" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737247/_page_0_Picture_15.jpeg b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737247/_page_0_Picture_15.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0b716c41d33346f48e974e1fd1d173930dd8325f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737247/_page_0_Picture_15.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:8a0732f17dcb9b299e2bf66d0f1860ac663f10af53b0e3d813eb08ef60258d57 +size 25021 diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737249/EFTA02737249.md b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737249/EFTA02737249.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..003d7c9c6dd5ebb6406155df889076832639611c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737249/EFTA02737249.md @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@ +Bennet J. Moskowitz bennet.moskowitz@troutman.com + +January 21, 2020 + +ECF + +Hon. GmcsH. Daniel Moynihan United States Courthouse 500 Pearl St. New York, NY 10007-1312 + +Re: v. Darren K. lndyke and Richard D. Kahn, as Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, 1:19-cv-10788 (GHW) (DCF) + +Dear Judge + +We represent Defendants Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (together, the "Co-Executors"), in the above-referenced action. We write pursuant to Your Honor's Individual Rules 1(A) and 2(C)(i) to set forth the grounds for the Co-Executors' anticipated motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) to dismiss the time-barred claims and punitive damages demand in Plaintiff Complaint (ECF No. 1). + +## 1. Plaintiff alleges torts occurring over 15 years ago in NY and other jurisdictions. + +Plaintiff, who claims Arizona residency, alleges that Mr. Epstein, now deceased, sexually assaulted her from 2002 to 2004 in Florida, New Mexico, New York, the U.S. Virgin Islands ("USVI") and France. (Compl. ¶¶ 4, 12, 17, 29, 34, 59-61.) Plaintiff alleges causes of action for battery, assault, and intentional infliction of emotional distress (Id. ¶¶ 71 - 82.) Plaintiff seeks, among other things, "punitive damages in an amount to be determined." (Id. p. 12.) + +## 2. Plaintiff's causes of action are partially time-barred. + +CPLR § 202 provides that, when a non-New York resident such as Plaintiff sues on a cause of action accruing outside New York, the complaint must be filed timely under the statute of limitations of both New York and the jurisdiction where the cause of action accrued. A claim that is untimely under one or both of the two jurisdictions must be dismissed. + +Plaintiff turned 18 at some point in 2003. (Compl. ¶ 34.) Plaintiff alleges she was sexually assaulted by Mr. Epstein until 2004, i.e., when Plaintiff was an adult (Compl. ¶¶ 34, 5961). Accordingly, excluding Plaintiff's alleged torts subject to the New York Child Victims Act,' if any, Plaintiff's causes of action sounding in battery must be commenced within one year of accrual (CPLR § 215(3)); or, if Plaintiff's claims sound in personal injury, within three years (CPLR § 214(5)). Therefore, under New York law, Plaintiff's claims arising from her alleged sexual abuse expired in 2007 at the latest. + +Plaintiff's claims based on alleged torts occurring outside New York also expired long ago, including torts that occurred while she was a minor, as follows: (Florida) for torts occurring while she was a minor, the later of within 7 years after she reached age of majority (Le., by 2010), within 4 years after she left the dependency of Mr. Epstein (2008 at the latest),2 or within 4 years from the time she discovered both the injury and the causal relationship between the injury and the abuse (Fla. Stat. § 95.11(7));3 and, after Plaintiff reached age of majority, within 4 years (Le., sometime in 2007) (Fla. Stat. § 95.11 (3)(O)); (New Mexico) for torts occurring while she was a minor, the later of the "first instant" of Plaintiff's 24th birthday (i.e., sometime in 2009) or 3 years from the date that Plaintiff first disclosed her childhood sexual abuse to a licensed medical or mental health care provider in the context of receiving health care (N.M. Stat. § 37-1- 30) (plaintiff alleges she never made such a disclosure (Compl. ¶ 67)); and, after Plaintiff reached age of majority, 3 years (i.e., in 2006) (N.M. Stat. § 37-1-8); (USVI) when Plaintiff turned 23 (Le., sometime in 2008) (5 V.I.C. §§ 31(5)(A), 36(a)(1)). + +Although Plaintiff suggests she is only suing on claims based on torts that occurred while she was still a minor (Compl. ¶ 69), she also alleges Mr. Epstein abused her "for years" (Id. at ¶ 29). The Court is not required to reconcile Plaintiff's contradictory allegations. See Whitley v. Bowden, No. 17-CV-3564 (KMK), 2018 WL 2170313, at '11 (S.D.N.Y. May 9, 2018) ("'a court is neither obligated to reconcile nor accept the contradictory allegations in the pleadings as true in deciding a motion to dismiss.- (citation omitted)). + +Therefore, Plaintiff's claims based on torts occurring in New York after she reached majority, as well as her claims based on torts occurring in New Mexico, Florida and the USVI regardless of whether she was a minor at the time — must be dismissed. + +The Child Victims Act created a one-year window period in which civil claims alleging damages "suffered as a result of conduct which would constitute a sexual offense as defined in article one hundred thirty of the penal law committed against a child less than eighteen years of age" may be filed despite the statute of limitations having already run. CPLR § 214-g (emphasis added). + +2 Plaintiff alleges Mr. Epstein "cast her out" in 2004. (Compl. ¶¶ 59-61.) Therefore, Plaintiff could not have depended on him after that time. + +3 Plaintiff's allegations that she is only now beginning to "process" her injuries (Compl. ¶¶ 65, 68) is not equivalent to alleging tolling due to her belated discovery of such injuries. She makes no such allegation. + +## 3. Plaintiff's claim for punitive damages fails as a matter of law. + +Courts in this District regularly grant motions to dismiss claims for punitive damages. See, e.g., The Cookware Co. (USA), LLC v. Austin, No. 15 Civ. 5796, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 177691, at '17 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 8, 2016) (Batts, J.) (granting motion to dismiss claim for punitive damages without leave to replead because allegations regarding defendant's bad faith conduct were conclusory and did not rise to required level of malice); SJB v. N.Y.C. Dept of Educ., No. 03 Civ. 6653, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13227, at '25-26 (S.D.N.Y. July 14, 2004) (Buchwald, J.) (granting motion to dismiss punitive damages claims because punitive damages were not statutorily available); Blasetti v. Pietropolo, 213 F. Supp. 2d 425, 431-32 (S.D.N.Y. 2002) (Kaplan, J.) (the] claim for punitive damages ... is dismissed."). + +Here, Plaintiff's claim for punitive damages must be dismissed as a matter of law because none of the jurisdictions where the alleged torts against Plaintiff occurred permit punitive damages against the personal representatives of a decedent tortfeasor's estate. See Poindexter v. Zacharzewski, 18-civ-14155, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 189861, at '6 (Nov. 5, 2018 S.D. Fla.) ("Florida law prohibits recovery of punitive damages from the estate of a wrongdoer who is deceased."); Jaramillo v. Providence Wash. Ins. Co., 117 N.M. 337, 346 (N.M. 1994) ("punishment and deterrence are not accomplished by enabling recovery of punitive damages from the estate of deceased tortfeasors."); NY EPTL § 11-3.2 (a)(1) ("For any injury, an action may be brought or continued against the personal representative of the decedent, but punitive damages shall not be awarded nor penalties adjudged in any such action brought to recover damages for personal injury." (emphasis added)). That is also the law in most U.S. jurisdictions, as reflected in the Restatement (Second) of Torts. See Restat. (Second) Of Torts § 908 cmt. a ("Punitive damages are not awarded against the representatives of a deceased tortfeasor."). See also Powell v. Chi-Co's Distrib., No. ST-13-TOR-14, 2014 V.I. LEXIS 21, at '5 n.13 (U.S.V.I. Super. Ct. Apr. 3, 2014) (Section 908(2) of the Restatement (Second) of Torts "reflects the common law of this jurisdiction") 4.5 + +USVI courts apply a -Banks analysis" to determine U.S.V.I. common law. Banks v. Intl Rental & Leasing Corp., 55 V.I. 967, 979 (V.I. 2011). The Banks analysis includes consideration of three factors: (1) whether any USVI courts have previously adopted a particular rule; (2) the position taken by a majority of courts of other jurisdictions; and (iina importantly, which approach represents the soundest rule for the USVI. Gov't of Virgin Islands v. No. S. CT. CIV. 2013-0095, 2014 WL 702639, at '1 (V.I. Feb. 24, 2014). Each Banks factor favors the Estate: (1) pre-Banks, USVI courts expressed approval for the general rule that punitive dii cannot be recovered against the personal representatives of a wrongdoer's estate (see. e.g.. v. Dowson Holding Co., 51 V.I. 619, 628 (D.V.I. 2009) (considering the inverse issue)); (2) a majority of courts from other jurisdictions preclude punitive damages against the personal representatives of a wrongdoers estate (2 Linda L. Schlueter, Punitive Damages § 20.4 (7th ed. 2015)); and (3) post-Banks, USVI courts have held Restatement § 908 represents the soundest rule for the USVI (see Powell. supra.). + +law does not recognize punitive damages. See 2 Linda L. Schlueter, Punitive Damages § 22.4 (7th ed. 2015) (citing Rouhette, The Availability of Punitive Damages in Europe: Growing Trend or Nonexistent Concept, 74 Def. Coun. J. 320 (2007)). + +Respectfully submitted, + +s/Bennet J. Moskowitz Bennet J. Moskowitz \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737249/EFTA02737249.metadata.json b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737249/EFTA02737249.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e27292f319309afe54d67b382aef1cbebf98870c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737249/EFTA02737249.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,246 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737249.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 8861, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.27, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "1. Plaintiff alleges torts occurring over 15 years ago in NY and other jurisdictions.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.904, + 462.51 + ], + [ + 525.8209228515625, + 462.51 + ], + [ + 525.8209228515625, + 476.9470520019531 + ], + [ + 86.904, + 476.9470520019531 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2. Plaintiff's causes of action are partially time-barred.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.904, + 571.05 + ], + [ + 382.0167236328125, + 571.05 + ], + [ + 382.0167236328125, + 584.9470520019531 + ], + [ + 86.904, + 584.9470520019531 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "3. Plaintiff's claim for punitive damages fails as a matter of law.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.904, + 115.01999999999998 + ], + [ + 429.6344909667969, + 115.01999999999998 + ], + [ + 429.6344909667969, + 129.3170166015625 + ], + [ + 86.904, + 129.3170166015625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 94 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 95 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 17 + ], + [ + "Line", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737249" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737253/EFTA02737253.md b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737253/EFTA02737253.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..89b572259e5aa320f5b561523f436fa7f25bd7bd --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737253/EFTA02737253.md @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@ +USDC SDNY +DOCUMENT +ELECTRONICALLY FILED +DOC #: +DATE FILED: 1/22/2020 + +UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT +SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK +[REDACTED] +X + +[REDACTED] +Plaintiff, +-against- +DARREN ■ INDYKE, as Executor of the Estate +of Jeffrey E. Epstein, and RICHARD D. KAHN +as Executor of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, +Defendants, : +X + +The above entitled action is referred to a United States magistrate judge for the following purpose: + +X General pertinal (includes scheduling, discovery, non-dispositive pretrial motions, and settlement) +Specific non-dispositive motion/dispute: +[REDACTED] +Habeas corpus +Dispositive motion (& &, dispositive motion, preliminary injunction) +Purpose: +[REDACTED] +Consent under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) for limited purpose (&, dispositive motion, Social Security Security Preliminary injunction) +[REDACTED] +Habeas corpus +[REDACTED] +Dispositive motion (&, motion X regularly Report and Recommendation) +[REDACTED] +All such motions: X + +Settlement - +Inguest after default/damages hearing +Consent under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) for all purposes (including trial) +Date: January 22, 2020 +New York, NY +GREGORY H. [REDACTED] +United States District judge + +SO ORDERED. + +[Signature of Gregory H. [REDACTED]] \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737253/EFTA02737253.metadata.json b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737253/EFTA02737253.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d0a4bf2b953a1fbc67fffb90eba9964120a52b8d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737253/EFTA02737253.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737253.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1271, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.8, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "SO ORDERED.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 422.28, + 198.45000000000002 + ], + [ + 507.96, + 198.45000000000002 + ], + [ + 507.96, + 214.64999999999998 + ], + [ + 422.28, + 214.64999999999998 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 92 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "Text", + 22 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737253" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737254/EFTA02737254.md b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737254/EFTA02737254.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..31b3c59b0e3e6fb72c4d68e0c049372c7553640f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737254/EFTA02737254.md @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@ +January 27, 2020 + +By ECF + +Hon. Debra Freeman + +U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York + +Daniel Moynihan + +United States Courthouse + +500 Pearl St. + +New York, NY 10007.1312 + +Your Honor: + +Re: v. Indyke et at., 19-cv-10788 (GHW)(DCF) + +We represent Plaintiff and write on behalf of all parties. + +On January 21, 2020, Defendants submitted a pre-motion letter to Judge proposing to file a motion to dismiss. (ECF 16). On January 22, Judge issued an Amended Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge clarifying that diapositive motions in this matter will be referred to Your Honor for Report & Recommendation. (ECF 17). It is our understanding of Your Honor's Individual Practices that no pm-motion letters are required for motions other than discovery motions, though Plaintiffs counsel is of course happy/prepared to submit one should Your Honor prefer that. + +Accordingly, we write 1) to seek clarification that Plaintiff need not submit a letter in response to Defendants' January 21 pre-motion letter addressed to Judge and 2) to propose the following briefing schedule for Defendants' motion: + +Defendants' motion papers to be filed by February 25, 2020; Plaintiffs' opposition papers to be filed by March 17, 2020; Defendants' reply papers to be filed by March 31, 2020. + +We appreciate Your Honor's attention to this matter. + +Very truly yours, + +/s/ Mariann Meier Wang + +cc: Bennet J. Moskowitz, Counsel for Defendants (by ECF) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737254/EFTA02737254.metadata.json b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737254/EFTA02737254.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d6588ec10f5b991f7282220af237d18f6170a252 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737254/EFTA02737254.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,96 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737254.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1438, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.03, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 5 + ], + [ + "Line", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737254" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737256/EFTA02737256.md b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737256/EFTA02737256.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c23143ceafe79fc790c436086f3920d1b7020977 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737256/EFTA02737256.md @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@ +MARIANN MEIER WANG +212.620.2603 TEL +212.620.2613 FAX + +MWANG@CHWLLP.COM + +USDC SDNY +DOCUMENT +ELECTRONICALLY FILED +DOC #: \_\_\_\_\_ +DATE FILED: 1/28/2020 + +*Before this Court sets a briefing schedule for a motion to dismiss, counsel are due to submit an update repaiding their settlement dismissions, specifically addressing the potential for their action being resolved without the need for motion practice.* + +January 27, 2020 + +By ECF +Hon. Debra Freeman +U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York +Daniel [REDACTED] Moynihan +United States Courthouse +500 Pearl St. +New York, NY 10007-1312 + +SO ORDERED: DATE: 1/28/2020 + +Re: [REDACTED] v. Indyke et al., 19-cv-10788 (GHWDCF) +DEBRA FREEMAN + +UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE + +Your Honor: + +We represent Plaintiff [REDACTED] and write on behalf of all parties. + +On January 21, 2020, Defendants submitted a pre-motion letter to Judge [REDACTED] proposing to file a motion to dismiss. (ECF 16). On January 22, Judge [REDACTED] issued an Amended Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge clarifying that dispositive motions in this matter will be referred to Your Honor for Report & Recommendation. (ECF 17). It is our understanding of Your Honor's Individual Practices that no pre-motion letters are required for motions other than discovery motions, though Plaintiff's counsel is of course happy/prepared to submit one should Your Honor prefer that. + +Accordingly, we write 1) to seek clarification that Plaintiff need not submit a letter in response to Defendants' January 21 pre-motion letter addressed to Judge [REDACTED], and 2) to propose the following briefing schedule for Defendants' motion: + +- - Defendants' motion papers to be filed by February 25, 2020; +- - Plaintiffs' opposition papers to be filed by March 17, 2020; +- - Defendants' reply papers to be filed by March 31, 2020. + +We appreciate Your Honor's attention to this matter. + +Very truly yours, + +/s/ Mariann Meier Wang \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737256/EFTA02737256.metadata.json b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737256/EFTA02737256.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b88bf4ea9fb698932a6542cafcceb30a1761bdae --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737256/EFTA02737256.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,58 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737256.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1962, + "elapsed_seconds": 8.27, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 44 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737256" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737257/EFTA02737257.md b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737257/EFTA02737257.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5509c1a055d500965457b99b96e98a11a3177b21 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737257/EFTA02737257.md @@ -0,0 +1,76 @@ +By ECF + +February 6, 2020 + +Hon. Debra Freeman U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Daniel Moynihan United States Courthouse 500 Pearl St. New York, NY 10007.1312 + +> Re: Jane Doe 15 u. Indyke et at, 19-cv-10653 (PAE)(DCF) Ma Doe u. Indyke et al., 19-cv-10758 (PAE)(DCF) u. Indyke et at, 19-cv-10788 (GHW)(DCF) + +Your Honor: + +We represent the plaintiffs in the three above-referenced cases. As directed in Your Honor's Order dated January 14, 2020, we write jointly with counsel for Defendants Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (the "Co-Executors"), to provide a proposed discovery schedule for these cases. The area where the parties have not reached agreement is indicated in italics, and each side's position is set forth below. + +- 1. Initial disclosures under Rule 26(a)(1) were exchanged on January 23, 2020. +- 2. Plaintiffs will provide HIPAA-compliant medical records release authorizations to Defendants no later than 14 days from Defendants' request, provided such date is not earlier than February 28, 2020. +- 3. The parties shall serve initial document requests and interrogatories by 30 days from the Court's entry of the discovery schedule. Plaintiffs served Defendants with their initial document requests and interrogatories but the parties have agreed that Defendants have until February 28, 2020 to respond thereto. +- 4. Any motion for joinder of other parties or amendment of the pleadings shall be made by 30 days from the Court's entry of the discovery schedule. + +## 5. *Deadlines for fact and expert discovery* + +### **Plaintiffs' Position** + +Plaintiffs' position is that the default timelines set forth in both Judge Engelmayer's and Judge [REDACTED] Civil Case Management Plan and Scheduling Orders should be used, which provide for: + +- ○ Fact discovery to be completed 120 days after the Court's entry of the discovery schedule +- ○ Expert disclosures to be made by the fact discovery deadline +- ○ Rebuttal expert disclosures to be made 14 days after expert disclosures +- ○ Expert discovery to be completed 45 days after the close of fact discovery + +Both Judge Engelmayer's and Judge [REDACTED] Civil Case Management Plan and Scheduling Orders indicate that those timelines be used unless the case presents "unique complexities or exceptional circumstances." Plaintiffs have few documents in their possession, and expect that these cases will not involve an unusual number of depositions. Plaintiffs do not believe that the fact that the Co-Executors are defendants in multiple lawsuits makes the discovery process in these lawsuits more complex or time-consuming. To the contrary, the fact that multiple lawsuits have been filed (including prior to these actions) suggests that the Co-Executors should have been working to identify and locate responsive documents many months ago. + +### **Co-Executors' Position** + +The Co-Executors' position is that the parties should adopt a compromise schedule. The Co-Executors disagree that the cases Plaintiffs filed do not present "unique complexities or exceptional circumstances." Among other things, there are more than twenty cases pending in various jurisdictions against the Co-Executors concerning various time frames, parties, non-parties and alleged conduct. Also, the Defendants are the Co-Executors of a large Estate, not an individual alleged tortfeasor. As a result, discovery in these matters requires more flexibility than typical lawsuits. + +Separately, it does not make sense to require that the parties' expert disclosures coincide with completion of fact discovery. The experts should have at least 30 days from the close of fact discovery to proffer initial reports. Nor is it reasonable for experts to proffer rebuttal reports a mere 14 days after receiving initial reports from each other. Thirty days is more appropriate. + +The original dates the Co-Executors proposed and which Plaintiff rejected, as well as the Co-Executors' compromise proposals, which Plaintiff also rejected, are as follows: + +- ○ Completion of fact discovery: 160 days from the Court's entry of the discovery schedule. (Compromise proposal: 140 days.) + +- o Expert disclosures and completion of expert discovery: 240 days from the Court's entry of the discovery schedule. (Compromise proposal: 200 days.) o Expert reports due 30 days from the close of fact discovery; and rebuttal reports due 30 days thereafter. +- 6. The subjects on which discovery may be needed, when discovery should be completed, and whether discovery should be conducted in phases or be limited to or focused on particular issues + +The general subjects of each action are: (1) Mr. Epstein's alleged abuse of plaintiffs; and (2) the plaintiffs' alleged damages. We see no reason to stage discovery. + +- 7. Any issues about disclosure, discovery, or preservation of electronically stored information, including the form or forms in which it should be produced + +The parties will confer about an ESI protocol. + +- 8. Any issues about claims of privilege or of protection as trial-preparation materials, including—if the parties agree on a procedure to assert these claims after production—whether to ask the court to include their agreement in an order under Federal Rule of Evidence 502 + +The parties are conferring about confidentiality orders in these cases, and expect to submit proposed orders to the Court soon, which will include a standard clawback provision regarding privileged materials. + +- 9. What changes should be made in the limitations on discovery imposed under these rules or by local rule, and what other limitations should be imposed + +The parties have no proposed changes at this time. + +- 10. Any other orders that the court should issue under Rule 26(c) or under Rule 16(b) and (c) + +The parties have no proposed orders at this time other than the protective orders mentioned above. + +\* \* \* + +Finally, with respect to v. Indyke et at, 19-cv-10788 (GHVV)(DCF), in the Memo Endorsement dated January 28, 2020 (ECF 19), Your Honor directed the parties to submit an update addressing the status of settlement discussions before the Court sets a briefing scheduling for Defendants' proposed motion to dismiss. Plaintiff remains open to the possibility of participating in the + +proposed voluntary compensation program if and when such program is approved, but it has not yet been approved. The parties have not yet had substantive settlement discussions. + +We appreciate Your Honor's attention to these matters. + +Very truly yours, + +/s/ Mariann Meier Wang + +Mariann Meier Wang + +cc: Counsel for Defendants, by ECF \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737257/EFTA02737257.metadata.json b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737257/EFTA02737257.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..95e8075e398f78b40e5ab4c237985a03d178b443 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737257/EFTA02737257.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,246 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737257.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 6612, + "elapsed_seconds": 8.9, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "5. Deadlines for fact and expert discovery", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 64.25999999999999, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 299.88, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 299.88, + 85.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 64.25999999999999, + 85.85999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Plaintiffs' Position", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.932, + 100.44 + ], + [ + 189.72, + 100.44 + ], + [ + 189.72, + 114.20999999999998 + ], + [ + 67.932, + 114.20999999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Co-Executors' Position", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.932, + 402.57 + ], + [ + 210.52799999999996, + 402.57 + ], + [ + 210.52799999999996, + 416.34000000000003 + ], + [ + 67.932, + 416.34000000000003 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 6 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 19 + ], + [ + "Line", + 10 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737257" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737261/EFTA02737261.md b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737261/EFTA02737261.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ee64a931b9fd207c2bf3ccee664d06f286d2a167 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737261/EFTA02737261.md @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ +The Clerk of Court of the Southern District of New York is directed to docket the within ORDER in each of the following actions: + +USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED poc tr. DATE FILEICallQ2a. VE v. Nine East 71st Street et at, No. 1:19-cv-07625 (AJN) (DF) + +Katlyn Doe v. Indyke et at, No. 1:19-cv-07771 (PKC) (DF) + +Priscilla Doe v. Indyke et at, No. 1:19-cv-07772 (ALC) (DF) + +Lisa Doe v. Indyke et at, No. 1:19-cv-07773 (ER) (DF) + +Jane Doe v. Indyke et at, No. 1:19-cv-08673 (KPF) (DF) + +v. Indyke et aL, No. 1:19-cv-10475 (LGS) (DF) + +v. Indyke et aL, No. 1:19-cv-10476 (PGG) (DF) + +v. Indyke et at, No. 1:19-cv-10479 (ALC) (DF) + +Jane Doe 1000 v. Indyke et aL, No. 1:19-cv-10577 (LGS) (DF) + +Jane Doe 15 v. Indyke et aL, No. 1:19-cv-10653 (PAE) (DF) + +Mary Doe v. Indyke et at, No. 1:19-cv-10758 (PAE) (DF) + +v. Indyke et at, No. 1:19-cv-10788 (O1-IW) (DF) + +Anastasia Doe v. Indyke et at, No. 1:19-cv-11869 (AJN) (DF) + +## DEBRA FREEMAN, United States Magistrate Judge: + +The Court having held a case management conference on February 11, 2020, with counsel for all parties in the above-referenced cases, it is hereby ORDERED, as stated at the conference, that: + +- 1. To the extent not already made, the parties shall make initial disclosures under Rule 26(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure no later than February 25, 2020. +- 2. The parties shall serve their initial document requests and interrogatories no later than March 10, 2020. In their initial interrogatories, the parties may, as reasonable, seek information outside the scope of Local Civil Rule 33.3(a). +- 3. Any motions to amend the pleadings or to join any additional parties shall be filed no later than April 30, 2020. + - 4. All fact discovery shall be completed no later than June 10, 2020. + +- 5. Expert discovery shall be conducted on the following schedule: + - a. Plaintiffs' expert reports shall be served no later than June 10, 2020. + - b. Defendants' rebuttal reports shall be served no later than July 10, 2020. + - c. Expert discovery shall be completed no later than July 31, 2020. + +6. The parties may stipulate to modify interim deadlines in this Scheduling Order, without seeking prior leave of Court. + +7. The parties to the above-referenced cases shall submit joint status reports to the Court, regarding discovery and the progress of settlement discussions, no later than April 30, 2020. + +Dated: New York, New York February 11, 2020 + +SO ORDERED + +DEBRA FREEMAN United States Magistrate Judge + +Copies to: + +All counsel in the above-referenced cases (via ECF) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737261/EFTA02737261.metadata.json b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737261/EFTA02737261.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..193889b3d033295a550b59ec8b56652efc54cf5d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737261/EFTA02737261.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,136 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737261.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2546, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.97, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "DEBRA FREEMAN, United States Magistrate Judge:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.932, + 336.15 + ], + [ + 351.7479248046875, + 336.15 + ], + [ + 351.7479248046875, + 352.863037109375 + ], + [ + 67.932, + 352.863037109375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 38 + ], + [ + "Line", + 19 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737261" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737263/EFTA02737263.md b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737263/EFTA02737263.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b545d5896e44d3d9fe2a0a8020b91d549af1c53e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737263/EFTA02737263.md @@ -0,0 +1,53 @@ +## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK + +X + +Plaintiff, + +: Index No. 1:19-cv-10788-GHW-DCF + +v. + +DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, as EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, + +Defendants. + +X + +## AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE + +I, Mary "Molly" S. DiRago, declare as follow: + +I. I am a member in good standing of the State Bar of Illinois and an associate with the law firm Troutman Sanders LLP, counsel for Defendants, Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn as Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (together, the "Co-Executors"). I submit this affidavit in support of my Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice before this Court. + +2. I have never been convicted of a felony. + +3. I have never been censured, suspended, disbarred, or denied admission or readmission by any court. + +4. There are no disciplinary proceedings presently against me. + +I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. + +Dated: February 13, 2020 Respectfully Submitted, + +Is/ Mary "Molly" S. DiRago + +Mary "Molly" S. DiRago (Pro Hac Vice Pending) + +Troutman Sanders LLP + +One North Wacker Drive, Suite 2905 + +Chicago, 60606 + +(312) 759-1926 + +(312) 759-1939 (Fax) + +molly.dirago@troutman.com + +Attorneys for Defendants Darren K. Indyke and + +Richard D. Kahn, Co-Executors of the Estate of + +Jeffrey E. Epstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737263/EFTA02737263.metadata.json b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737263/EFTA02737263.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9b64e86bedfc9a8b9145fcec4bcc73b10606a379 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737263/EFTA02737263.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,143 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737263.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1403, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.02, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 70.38, + 84.24 + ], + [ + 281.419189453125, + 84.24 + ], + [ + 281.419189453125, + 112.10302734375 + ], + [ + 70.38, + 112.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 100.98000000000002, + 309.7315673828125 + ], + [ + 512.6567993164062, + 309.7315673828125 + ], + [ + 512.6567993164062, + 324.0 + ], + [ + 100.98000000000002, + 324.0 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 28 + ], + [ + "Line", + 14 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737263" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737265/EFTA02737265.md b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737265/EFTA02737265.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a9565808843b9f46440a60526d81a0a25f220f19 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737265/EFTA02737265.md @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@ +## Certificate of Admission To the Bar of Illinois + +I, Carolyn Taft Grosboll, Clerk of the Supreme Court of Illinois, do hereby certify that + +Mary Sharon DiRago + +has been duly licensed and admitted to practice as an Attorney and Counselor at Law within this State; has duly taken the required oath to support the CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES and of the STATE OF ILLINOIS, and also the oath of office prescribed by law, that said name was entered upon the Roll of Attorneys and Counselors in my office on 11/04/2004 and is in good standing, so far as the records of this office disclose. + +> IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my name and affixed the seal of said Court, this 31st day of January, 2020. + +> > Croy Gtsidee + +Clerk, Supreme Court of the State of Illinois + +## CERTIFICATE OF GOOD STANDING + +![](_page_1_Picture_2.jpeg) + +United States of America + +}ss. Mary S DiRago + +Northern District of Illinois + +G. Bruton , Clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, + +DO HEREBY CERTIFY That Mary S DiRago was duly admitted to practice in said Court on (12/08/2004) and is in good standing as amember of the bar of said court. + +Dated at Chicago, Illinois on (01/29/2020 ) + +Bruton , Clerk, + +By: Tina Lam Deputy Clerk \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737265/EFTA02737265.metadata.json b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737265/EFTA02737265.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2fc135baf34c4177f5ac01c09d758dce66b97732 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737265/EFTA02737265.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,153 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737265.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1263, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.66, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_1_Picture_2.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "Certificate of Admission \nTo the Bar of Illinois", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 196.452, + 112.59 + ], + [ + 460.2667236328125, + 112.59 + ], + [ + 460.2667236328125, + 166.19854736328125 + ], + [ + 196.452, + 166.19854736328125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF GOOD STANDING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 149.32799999999997, + 53.46 + ], + [ + 467.3410339355469, + 53.46 + ], + [ + 467.3410339355469, + 74.53363037109375 + ], + [ + 149.32799999999997, + 74.53363037109375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 165 + ], + [ + "Line", + 19 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 104 + ], + [ + "Line", + 16 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737265" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737265/_page_1_Picture_2.jpeg b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737265/_page_1_Picture_2.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..abe1042595aeeb742740b414ceb3ddd89d7e1f79 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737265/_page_1_Picture_2.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:53b7efb7b2f665dcdd9f57df7001951137561a997dfe021489815e34905d62c3 +size 13341 diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737267/EFTA02737267.md b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737267/EFTA02737267.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..00515e01004fbe6bffe501a2f9d6f5d45cffc3fe --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737267/EFTA02737267.md @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@ +## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK + +X Plaintiff, v. DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, as EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Defendants. X + +: Index No. 1:19-cv-10788-GHW-DCF + +## MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE + +Pursuant to Rule 1.3 of the Local Rules of the United States Courts for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York, Molly S. DiRago hereby moves this Court for an Order for admission to practice Pro Hac Vice to appear as counsel for Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn as Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (together, the "Co-Executors"), in the above-captioned action. + +I am in good standing of the bar(s) of the state of Illinois and there are no pending disciplinary proceedings against me in any state or federal court. I have never been convicted of a felony. I have never been censured, suspended, disbarred or denied admission or readmission by any court. I have attached the affidavit pursuant to Local Rule 1.3. + +Dated: February 13, 2020 Respectfully Submitted, + +Is/ Mary "Molly" S. DiRago + +Mary "Molly" S. DiRago (Pro Hac Vice Pending) + +Troutman Sanders LLP + +One North Wacker Drive, Suite 2905 + +Chicago, 60606 + +(312) 759-1926 + +(312) 759-1939 (Fax) + +molly.dirago@troutman.com + +Attorneys for Defendants Darren K. Indyke and + +Richard D. Kahn, Co-Executors of the Estate of + +Jeffrey E. Epstein \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737267/EFTA02737267.metadata.json b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737267/EFTA02737267.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9069e62c771cdd725993d0d3ab0274c4a603d7ba --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737267/EFTA02737267.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,143 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737267.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1373, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.7, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 281.419189453125, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 281.419189453125, + 112.10302734375 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 112.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 182.37599999999998, + 311.04 + ], + [ + 430.1128845214844, + 311.04 + ], + [ + 430.1128845214844, + 325.10302734375 + ], + [ + 182.37599999999998, + 325.10302734375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 27 + ], + [ + "Line", + 14 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737267" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737269/EFTA02737269.md b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737269/EFTA02737269.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e503bc948e56af593a0a7eacb3857cd25601e2c1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737269/EFTA02737269.md @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK + +X Plaintiff, v. DARREN K. 1NDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, as EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Defendants. X + +USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: PO + +Index No. I :19-cv- I 0788-GHW-DCF + +## ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE + +The motion of Mary "Molly" S. DiRago for admission to practice Pro Hac Vice in the above captioned action is granted. + +Applicant has declared that she is a member in good standing of the bar(s) of the state(s) of Illinois; and that her contact information is as follows: + +Mary "Molly" S. DiRago Troutman Sanders LLP One North Wacker Drive, Suite 2905 Chicago, 60606 (312) 759-1926 (312) 759-1939 (Fax) mo l ly.d irago@troutman.com + +Applicant having requested admission Pro Hac Vice to appear for all purposes as counsel for Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn as Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (together, the "Co-Executors"), in the above entitled action; + +IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Applicant is admitted to practice Pro Hac Vice in the above captioned case in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. + +All attorneys appearing before this Court are subject to the Local Rules of this Court, including the Rules governing discipline of attorneys. + +Dated: 2/14/2020 + +![]()DEBRA FREEMAN +UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE +SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737269/EFTA02737269.metadata.json b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737269/EFTA02737269.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8b2ada0b95243b09ddddf4a3626317045e2febe5 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737269/EFTA02737269.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,120 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737269.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1413, + "elapsed_seconds": 2.47, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 189.72, + 306.18 + ], + [ + 419.83200000000005, + 306.18 + ], + [ + 419.83200000000005, + 321.2235412597656 + ], + [ + 189.72, + 321.2235412597656 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 11 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737269" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737271/EFTA02737271.md b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737271/EFTA02737271.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ca31e7bdeda3691beb0fb7afcd827c0e8bf4bb25 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737271/EFTA02737271.md @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ +Bennet J. Moskowitz bennelmoskowitz©Iroutman.com + +February 26, 2020 + +## VIA ELECTRONIC COURT FILING + +Hon. Debra C. Freeman Daniel Moynihan United States Courthouse 500 Pearl St. New York, NY 10007 + +Re: v. Indyke et al. 1:19-cv-10788 (GHW) (DCF) + +Dear Judge Freeman: + +We represent Defendants Darren,. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, in the above-referenced action. We write on behalf of all parties to respectfully request the Court's approval of the following briefing schedule for the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss:' + +- Defendants' motion papers to be filed by February 28, 2020; +- Plaintiff's opposition papers to be filed by March 20, 2020; and +- Defendants' reply papers to be filed by March 30, 2020. + +Respectfully submitted, + +siBennet J. Moskowitz Bennet J. Moskowitz + +cc: All Counsel of Record via ECF + +'For additional context, we respectfully refer to the Court's Order dated January 28, 2020 (ECF 19). During the Court conference held on February 11, 2020, counsel for Plaintiff advised the Court regarding settlement discussions, as the Court requested in its Order. The Court has not yet set a briefing schedule. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737271/EFTA02737271.metadata.json b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737271/EFTA02737271.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..46ddc7829d74a3bd86d12da0b766e9874745918b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737271/EFTA02737271.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,98 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737271.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1185, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.81, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "VIA ELECTRONIC COURT FILING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 213.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 249.1669921875, + 213.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 249.1669921875, + 227.070556640625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 227.070556640625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737271" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737272/EFTA02737272.md b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737272/EFTA02737272.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f560fdb284dddef6447aaf5bc67597ecd825e468 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737272/EFTA02737272.md @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@ +Troutman Sanders LLP 875 Third Avenue New York, New York 10022 + +troutman.com + +![](_page_0_Picture_4.jpeg) + +Bennet J. Moskowitz + +bennet.moskowitz@troutrnan.com + +February 26, 2020 + +## VIA ELECTRONIC COURT FILING + +Hon. Debra C. Freeman Daniel Moynihan United States Courthouse 500 Pearl St. New York, NY 10007 + +USDC SDNY DOCUMENT + +ELECTRONICALLY FILED + +DOC #: + +DATE FII4D• 2/)Vi02,-04 + +Re: v. Indvke etal. 1:19-cv-10788 (GHW) (IDCF) + +Dear Judge Freeman: + +We represent Defendants Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, Co-Executors of the Estate.of Jeffrey E. Epstein, in the above-referenced action. We write on behalf of all parties to respectfully request the Court's approval of the following briefing schedule for the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss:' + +- Defendants' motion papers to be filed by February 28, 2020; +- Plaintiffs opposition papers to be filed by March 20, 2020; and +- Defendants' reply pap rs to be filed by March 30, 2020. + +Los SO ORDERED: DATE: + +. DEBRA FREEMAN UNE(ED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE + +cc: All Counsel of Record via ECF + +Respectfully submitted, + +s/Bennet J. Moskowitz Bennet J. Moskowitz + +'For additional context, we respectfully refer to the Court's Order dated January 28, 2020 (ECF 19). During the Court conference held on February 11, 2020, counsel for Plaintiff advised the Court regarding settlement discussions, as the Court requested in its Order. The Court has not yet set a briefing schedule. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737272/EFTA02737272.metadata.json b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737272/EFTA02737272.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c31d19c0efff5feb01b7e5cecd30883b12f133ef --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737272/EFTA02737272.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,104 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737272.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1441, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.99, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_0_Picture_4.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "VIA ELECTRONIC COURT FILING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 70.992, + 218.70000000000002 + ], + [ + 245.32904052734375, + 218.70000000000002 + ], + [ + 245.32904052734375, + 232.33056640625 + ], + [ + 70.992, + 232.33056640625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 97 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737272" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737272/_page_0_Picture_4.jpeg b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737272/_page_0_Picture_4.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..22e3618669e903035405ef6d009d56c15f07f127 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737272/_page_0_Picture_4.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:5f7bba86e6393194082cb392c13a4676c2c2b05d7f96afe1fc3abb37ec1c54ed +size 6818 diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737273/EFTA02737273.md b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737273/EFTA02737273.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bf5dada8c452e93b69591ff7cc1c53c6e97f3184 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737273/EFTA02737273.md @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK + +v. + +DARREN I. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, as executors of the ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, + +Defendants. + +Case No. I :19-cv- 10788 (GHW) (DCF) + +## NOTICE OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS + +PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that upon the accompanying Memorandum of Law and all prior pleadings and proceedings in this action, Defendants will move this Court before the Hon. Gregory H. United States District Judge, at the Daniel Moynihan United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York 10007. at a time to be scheduled by this Court, for an Order pursuant to Rule 12(1)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure dismissing Plaintiff Complaint and claims for punitive damages with prejudice (ECF No. I); and for such other and further relief as may be just and proper. + +Dated: New York, New York February 28, 2020 + +By: Is/ Bennet J. Moskowitz Bennet J. Moskowitz TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP 875 Third Avenue New York, New York 10022 + +Attorneys for Defendants \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737273/EFTA02737273.metadata.json b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737273/EFTA02737273.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6125fc123b06c548b8455119fe3cac9de7b1a5ab --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737273/EFTA02737273.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,109 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737273.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1011, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.69, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 192.78000000000003, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 418.4738464355469, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 418.4738464355469, + 100.10302734375 + ], + [ + 192.78000000000003, + 100.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 162.18, + 266.49 + ], + [ + 450.97998046875, + 266.49 + ], + [ + 450.97998046875, + 281.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 162.18, + 281.9830322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737273" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737274/EFTA02737274.md b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737274/EFTA02737274.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..35d061450729468e275bc0cc7f4ba63bad97ca8c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737274/EFTA02737274.md @@ -0,0 +1,210 @@ +#### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK + +v. + +DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, as executors of the ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, + +Defendants. + +Case No. 1:19-cv- 10788 (GHW) (DCF) + +#### DEFENDANTS' MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT + +TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP 875 Third Avenue New York, New York 10022 Tel: 212-704-6000 Fax: 212-704-6288 + +Attorneys for Defendants + +# TABLE OF CONTENTS + +| | Page | +|------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------| +| PRELIMINARY STATEMENT | 1 | +| STATEMENT OF ALLEGED FACTS | 2 | +| A. Plaintiff Alleges Torts Occurring Over 15 Years Ago In New York And | | +| Other Jurisdictions, Starting When She Was Age Seventeen | 2 | +| ARGUMENT | 2 | +| A. Legal Standard: Plaintiff's Legal Conclusions, Labels And Formulaic | | +| State A Claim | 2 | +| B. Most Of Plaintiff's Claims Expired Many Years Ago | 3 | +| C. Plaintiff's Claim For Punitive Damages Fails As A Matter Of Law | 4 | +| I. Banks factor one: previously, USVI courts favorably cited the | | +| estates | 7 | +| 2. | Banks factor two: a majority of U.S. jurisdictions do not permit an | +| decedent. | 7 | +| 3. Banks factor three: Post-Banks, USVI courts have favorably | | +| damages | 8 | +| CONCLUSION | 9 | + +#### TABLE OF AUTHORITIES + +| Cases Ashcroft v. lqbal, | Page(s) | +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------| +| 556 U.S. 662 (2009) Banks v. Int'l Rental & Leasing Corp., | 2 | +| 55 V.I. 967 (V.I. 2011) Bell Att Corp. v. Twombly, | 6, 7, 8 | +| 550 U.S. 544 (2007) Blissett v. Eisensmidt, | 2 | +| 940 F. Supp. 449 (N.D.N.Y. 1996) Booth v. Bowen, | 6 | +| No. CIV. 2006-217, 2008 WL 220067 (D.V.I. Jan. 10, 2008) Brandy v. Flamboyant Inv. Co., Ltd., 24 V.I. 249 (V.I. Ten. Ct. 1989) Crabtree v. Estate of Crabtree, | 7 | +| 837 N.E.2d 135 (Ind. 2005) v. Christian, | 7 | +| 46 V.I. 557 (D.V.I. App. Div. 2005) Gov't of Virgin Islands v. | 8 | +| No. S. Cr. CIV. 2013-0095, 2014 WL 702639 (V.I. Feb. 24, 2014) Graham v. | 6 | +| 224 F.R.D. 59 (N.D.N.Y. 2004) v. Dowson Holding Co., | 6 | +| 51 V.I. 619 (D.V.I. 2009) Isaac v. Crichlow, | 7 | +| 63 V.I. 38, 2015 V.I. LEXIS 15 (V.I. Super. Ct. 2015) Jaramillo v. Providence Wash. Ins. Co., | 8 | +| 117 N.M. 337 (N.M. 1994). Kunica v. St. Jean Fin., | .6 | +| (Sweet, J.) | 4 | + +Lohr v. Byrd, 522 So. 2d 845 (Fla. 1988) 6 + +Pappas v. Hotel on the Cay Time-Sparing Ass'n, 69 V.I. 3 (U.S.V.I. Super. Ct. 2015) 8 + +Poindexter v. Zacharzewski, No. 18-14155, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 189861 (Nov. 5, 2018 S.D. Fla.) 6 + +Powell v. Chi-Co's Distrib., No. ST-13-TOR-14, 2014 V.I. LEXIS 21 (U.S.V.I. Super. O. Apr. 3, 2014) 8 + +v. Consumers Distrib. Co., 648 F. Supp. 980 (S.D.N.Y. 1986) (Cedarbaum, J.) 4 + +Simons v. Marriott Corp., No. 92 Civ. 3762 (SWK), 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14365 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 12, 1993) 5 + +SIR v. N.Y.C. Dep't of Educ., No. 03 Civ. 6653, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13227 (S.D.N.Y. July 14, 2004) (Buchwald, J.) 4 + +St. House, Inc. v. Barrows, 15 V.I. 435 (V.I. Terr. Ct. 1979) 8 + +Starr Indem. & Liab. Co. v. Am. Claims Mgmt., No. 14-cv-0463-JMF, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60272 (S.D.N.Y. May 7, 2015) 5 + +The Cookware Co. (USA), LLC v. Austin, No. 15 Civ. 5796, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 177691 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 8, 2016) (Batts, J.) 4 + +v. Rijos, 780 F. Supp. 2d 376 (D.V.I. 2011) 8 + +Whitley v. Bowden, No. 17-CV-3564 (KMK), 2018 WL 2170313 (S.D.N.Y. May 9, 2018) 3 + +## Statutes + +EPTL § 11-3.2 (a)(1) 5 + +Fla. Stat. § 95.11 (3)(O) 4 + +Fla. Stat. § 95.11(7) 4 + +N.M. Stat. § 37-1-8 4 + +| N.M. Stat. § 37-1-30 | 4 | +|------------------------------------------|---| +| New York Estates, Powers and Trusts Law | 5 | +| New York General Construction Law § 37-a | 6 | +| New York's Child Victims Act | 1 | + +# Other Authorities + +| Imposed Against a Deceased Tortfeasor's Estate in Ohio, | 49 Akron L. Rev. | +|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------| +| 553 (2016) | 7 | +| CPLR § 202 | 3 | +| CPLR § 214(5) | 3 | +| CPLR § 214-g | 1 | +| CPLR § 215(3) | 3 | +| Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) | 1 | +| 2 Linda L. Schlueter, Punitive Damages § 20.4 (7th ed. 2015) | 7 | +| Restatement of Torts Section 908 | 8 | +| Restatement (Second) of Torts | 7 | +| Restatement (Second) of Torts (1965) | 8 | +| Restatement (Second) of Torts § 908(2) | 7, 8 | +| Rouhette, The Availability of Punitive Damages in Europe: Growing Trend or | | +| Nonexistent Concept | 6 | +| Timothy R. Robicheaux and Brian H. Bornstein, Punished, | Dead Or Alive: | +| Defendants | 8 | + +Defendants Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, as Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (the "Co-Executors"), submit this memorandum of law in support of their motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(6)(6) to dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF No. I) to the extent it is time-barred and Plaintiff's claim for punitive damages because it is prohibited as a matter of law. + +#### PRELIMINARY STATEMENT + +This action is largely time-barred. Plaintiff alleges that Jeffrey E. Epstein ("Decedent"), now deceased, sexually assaulted her from 2002, when she was 17, to 2004, in Florida, New Mexico, New York, the U.S. Virgin Islands ("USVr') and France. (Comp1.11 4, 12, 17, 29, 34, 59-61.) Plaintiff alleges causes of action for battery, assault, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. (Id. 11 71—82.) Plaintiff seeks, among other things, "punitive damages in an amount to be determined." (Id. p. 12.) + +Excluding Plaintiff's alleged tons occurring in New York when she was 17 and thus subject to New York's Child Victims Act ("CVA") I Plaintiff's claims expired many years ago. Under New York law, for example, Plaintiffs claims arising from her alleged sexual abuse as an adult expired in 2007 at the latest. Therefore, all of the Plaintiff's non-CVA claims must be dismissed. + +Plaintiff's demand for punitive damages must also be dismissed as a matter of law. Each jurisdiction where the alleged torts occurred bars recovery of punitive damages from a decedent tortfeasor's estate—i.e., exactly what Plaintiff seeks here. + +'The CVA created a one-year window period, commencing in August 2019, in which civil claims alleging damages "suffered as a result of conduct which would constitute a sexual offense as defined in article one hundred thirty of the penal law committed against a child less than eighteen years of age" may be filed, despite the statute of limitations having already run. CPLR § 214-g (emphasis added). + +#### STATEMENT OF ALLEGED FACTS + +#### A. Plaintiff Alleges Torts Occurring Over 15 Years Ago In New York And Other Jurisdictions, Starting When She Was Age Seventeen + +Plaintiff, who claims Arizona residency, alleges that in 2002, when she was 17, her sister, who is five years older, introduced Plaintiff to Decedent, describing him as generous and desiring to help Plaintiff attend college. (Compl. qq 32, 34.) Plaintiff further alleges that, starting in 2002 and ending in 2004, Decedent sexually assaulted her in Florida, New Mexico, New York, the USVI, and France. (Id. In 4. 12, 17, 29, 34, 59-61.) Although Plaintiff suggests she is only suing on claims based on torts that occurred while she was still a minor (id. 1 69), she also alleges Decedent abused her "for years" (id.1 29). Plaintiff largely fails to articulate which alleged torts happened when and in which jurisdictions. + +Plaintiff asserts three causes of action: battery (First Cause of Action); assault (Second Cause of Action); and intentional infliction of emotional distress (Third Cause of Action). (Id. 11i 71—82.) As noted above, Plaintiff seeks punitive damages in an unspecified amount. (Id. p. 12.) + +#### ARGUMENT + +#### A. Legal Standard: Plaintiff's Legal Conclusions, Labels And Formulaic Recitations Of The Elements Of Her Causes Of Action Are Insufficient To State A Claim + +"To survive a motion to dismiss, a complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face." Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009). While a Court must normally accept as true all well-pleaded factual allegations in a complaint and draw all inferences in a plaintiff's favor, those principles are "inapplicable to legal conclusions." Id. at 678 (2009) (citing Bell Ad. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555, 556 (2007)). Thus, a pleading that offers only "labels and conclusions" or "a formulaic recitation of the elements of a cause of action will not do." Twombly, 550 U.S. at 555 (2007). Nor is the Court + +required to reconcile Plaintiffs contradictory allegations concerning whether she is suing only for alleged torts that occurred when she was 17, or for sexual abuse allegedly committed when she was an adult. See Whitley v. Bowden, No. I7-CV-3564 (KMK), 2018 WL 2170313, at •11 (S.D.N.Y. May 9, 2018) ("'a court is neither obligated to reconcile nor accept the contradictory allegations in the pleadings as true in deciding a motion to dismiss.' (citation omitted)). + +## B. Most Of Plaintiff's Claims Expired Many Years Ago + +CPLR § 202 provides that, when a non-New York resident such as Plaintiff sues on a cause of action accruing outside New York, the complaint must be timely filed under the applicable statutes of limitations of both New York and the jurisdiction where the cause of action accrued. A claim that is untimely under one or both of the two jurisdictions must be dismissed. + +Plaintiff turned 18 at some point in 2003. (Compl. I 34.) Plaintiff alleges she was sexually assaulted by Decedent until 2004, i.e., when Plaintiff was an adult. (Id. 11 34, 59-61.) Excluding Plaintiffs alleged torts subject to the CVA (i.e., tons occurring in New York when she was under 18), Plaintiffs causes of action sounding in battery must be commenced within one year of accrual (CPLR § 215(3)); or, if Plaintiff's claims sound in personal injury, within three years (CPLR § 214(5)). Therefore, under New York law, Plaintiff's non-CVA claims arising from her alleged sexual abuse expired in 2007 at the latest. + +Plaintiffs claims based on alleged torts occurring outside New York also expired long ago under the laws of those jurisdictions, including non-New York torts that occurred while she was a minor (if any), as follows: (Florida) for torts occurring while she was a minor, the later of within 7 years after she reached the age of majority (i.e., by 2010), within 4 years after she left Decedent's dependency (2008 at the latest),2 or within 4 years from the time she discovered both the injury + +2 Plaintiff alleges Decedent "cast her out" in 2004. (Compl. yy 59-61.) Therefore. Plaintiff could not have depended on him after that time. + +and the causal relationship between that injury and the alleged abuse (Ha. Stat. § 95.11(7));3 and, after Plaintiff reached age of majority, within 4 years (i.e., sometime in 2007) (Ha. Stat. § 95.11 (3)(O)); (New Mexico) for torts occurring while she was a minor, the later of the "first instant" of Plaintiff's 24th birthday (i.e., sometime in 2009) or 3 years from the date that Plaintiff first disclosed her childhood sexual abuse to a licensed medical or mental health care provider in the context of receiving health care (N.M. Stat. § 37-1-30) (Plaintiff alleges she never made such a disclosure (Comp1.1 67)); and, after Plaintiff reached age of majority, 3 years (i.e., in 2006) (N.M. Stat. § 37-1-8); (USVI) when Plaintiff turned 23 (i.e., sometime in 2008) (5 V.I.C. §§ 31(5)(A), 36(a)(1)). + +# C. Plaintiff's Claim For Punitive Damages Fails As A Matter Of Law + +Plaintiff's claim for punitive damages fails as a matter of law because it is barred by the law of each potentially applicable jurisdiction. Courts in this District regularly grant motions to dismiss legally deficient claims for punitive damages. See, e.g., The Cookware Co. (USA), LLC v. Austin, No. 15 Civ. 5796, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 177691, at \*17 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 8, 2016) (Batts, J.) (granting motion to dismiss claim for punitive damages without leave to replead because allegations regarding defendant's bad-faith conduct were conclusory and did not rise to the required level of malice); SJB v. N.Y.C. Dep't of Educ., No. 03 Civ. 6653, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13227, at \*25-.26 (S.D.N.Y. July 14, 2004) (Buchwald, J.) (granting motion to dismiss punitive damages claims because punitive damages were not statutorily available); Kunica v. St. Jean Fin., No. 97 Civ. 3804, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11867, at \*26 (S.D.N.Y. July 29, 1998) (Sweet, J.) (granting motion to dismiss claim for punitive damages because, even if conduct alleged in complaint was true, it did not rise to the level necessary to award punitive damages); v. + +3 Plaintiff's allegation that she is only now beginning to -process" her injuries (Complilli 65, 68) is not equivalent to alleging her belated discovery of such injuries. She makes no such allegation. + +Consumers Distrib. Co., 648 F. Supp. 980, 981, 984 (S.D.N.Y. 1986) (Cedarbaum, J.) (granting motion to dismiss claim for punitive damages). + +When determining what law applies, the Court looks to the choice-of-law rules of the forum state. Simons v. Marriott Corp., No. 92 Civ. 3762 (SWK), 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14365, at \*15 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 12, 1993). Under New York law, the law of the state where a tort occurs generally applies to punitive damages. See Starr Indent & Liab. Co. v. Am. Claims Mgmt., No. 14-cv-0463- JMF, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60272, \*7 (S.D.N.Y. May 7, 2015) ("Because punitive damages are conduct-regulating, 'the law of the jurisdiction where the tort occurred will generally apply.' (quoting Deutsch v. Novarris Pharms. Corp., 723 F. Supp. 2d 521, 524 (E.D.N.Y. 2010)); Guidi v. Inter-Continental Hotels Corp., No. 95-CV-9006 (LAP), 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6390, at \*I (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 16, 2003)). + +Here, Plaintiff alleges tortious conduct occurring in New York, Florida, New Mexico, the USVI, and France. (Compl. 11 40, 42.) None of these jurisdictions permits recovery of punitive damages against a deceased tortfeasor's estate. That is unsurprising given that is the law in most jurisdictions, as reflected in the Restatement. See Restat. (Second) of Torts § 908 cmt. a (punitive damages not available against representatives of deceased tortfeasor). Each of these jurisdictions is addressed below in turn. + +New York: New York Estates, Powers and Trusts Law provides: "No cause of action for injury to person or property is lost because of the death of the person liable for the injury. For any injury, an action may be brought or continued against the personal representative of the decedent, but punitive damages shall not be awarded nor penalties adjudged in any such action brought to recover damages for personal injury." NY EPTL § 11-3.2 (a)(1) (emphasis added). "Also, 'there is a strong policy against the assessment of punitive damages against an estate on account of wrongful conduct of the decedent?" Graham v. ,224 F.R.D. 59, 63 (N.D.N.Y. 2004) (quoting Blissett v. Eisensmidt, 940 F. Supp. 449, 457 (N.D.N.Y. 1996)). + +New York General Construction Law § 37-a defines "personal injury" as including "an assault, battery, false imprisonment, or other actionable injury to the person either of the plaintiff, or of another." Here, Plaintiff seeks to recover damages for personal injuries. Accordingly, Plaintiff may not recover punitive damages against the Co-Executors based on alleged torts that occurred in New York. + +Florida: "Florida law prohibits recovery of punitive damages from the estate of a wrongdoer who is deceased." Poindexter v. Zacharzewski, No. 18-14155, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 189861, at \*6 (Nov. 5, 2018 S.D. Ha.) (citing Lohr v. Byrd, 522 So. 2d 845 (Ha. 1988)). + +New Mexico:The Supreme Court of New Mexico has unequivocally held that "punishment and deterrence are not accomplished by enabling recovery of punitive damages from the estate of deceased tortfeasors." Jaramillo v. Providence Wash. Ins. Co., 117 N.M. 337, 346 (N.M. 1994). + +France: law does not recognize punitive damages. See 2 Linda L. Schlueter, Punitive Damages § 22.4 (7th ed. 2015) (citing Rouhette, The Availability of Punitive Damages in Europe: Growing Trend or Nonexistent Concept, 74 Def. Coun. J. 320 (2007)). + +USVI: In 2011, the Supreme Court of the USVI effectively instructed USVI courts to apply what is now known as a "Banks analysis" to determine U.S.V.I. common law. Banks v. Int'l Rental & Leasing Corp., 55 V.I. 967, 979 (V.I. 2011). The Banks analysis includes consideration of three non-dispositive factors: (1) whether any USVI courts have previously adopted a particular rule; (2) the position taken by a majority of courts of other jurisdictions; and (3) most importantly. which approach represents the soundest rule for the USVI. Gov't of Virgin Islands v. No. S. CT. CIV. 2013-0095, 2014 WL 702639, at \*1 (V.I. Feb. 24, 2014). + +Applying the Banks factors here demonstrates that USVI courts would adopt the rule in the Restatement (Second) of Torts—which is also followed in the majority of United States jurisdictions, including New York, Florida and New Mexico—and hold that punitive damages are not available against a deceased tortfeasor's estate. + +- 1. Banks factor one: previously, USVI courts favorably cited the Restatement section that precludes punitive damages against estates. + +USVI courts have favorably recited the Restatement's rule precluding punitive damages against a decedent tortfeasor's estate. See, e.g., v. Dowson Holding Co., 51 V.I. 619, 628 (D.V.I. 2009); Booth v. Bowen, No. C1V. 2006-217, 2008 WL 220067, at \*5 (D.V.I. Jan. 10, 2008). In these cases, the U.S. District Court of the Virgin Islands considered the inverse of the issue here, i.e., whether the personal representatives of an estate may obtain punitive damages in an action arising from the decedent's wrongful death. In determining that punitive damages were not available under such circumstances, the courts cited the Restatement, which provides that Iplunifive damages are not awarded against the representatives of a deceased tortfeasor nor, ordinarily, in an action under a death statute." Restat. (Second) of Tons § 908 cmt. a (emphasis added). Accordingly, this Banks factor favors the Co-Executors. + +- 2. Banks factor two: a majority of U.S. jurisdictions do not permit an award of punitive damages based on the wrongful acts of a decedent. + +This Banks factor overwhelmingly supports the Co-Executors' position. The majority of U.S. jurisdictions do not permit an award of punitive damages against the personal representatives of an estate based on the actions of the deceased tortfeasor. See Crabtree v. Estate of Crabtree, 837 N.E.2d 135, 138 (Ind. 2005) ("The majority view denies punitive damages."); 2 Linda L. Schlueter, Punitive Damages § 20.4 (7th ed. 2015) ("[A] majority of jurisdictions will not award punitive damages against a deceased tortfeasor's estate." (citing Alec A. Beech, Adding Insult to Death: Why Punitive Damages Should Not Be Imposed Against a Deceased Torgeasor's Estate in + +Ohio, 49 Akron L. Rev. 553 (2016))); Timothy R. Robicheaux and Brian H. Bornstein, Punished, Dead Or Alive: Empirical Perspectives on Awarding Punitive Damages Against Deceased Defendants, 16 Psych. Pub. Pol. and L. 393, 398 (2010) ("The Restatement (Second) of Torts (1965) is one authority stating that punitive damages should not follow the death of a wrongdoer, and the majority of courts considering the issue have provided rulings consistent with this position."). + +#### 3. Banks factor three: Post-Banks, USVI courts have favorably applied Restatement Section 908 to questions regarding punitive damages. + +The third Banks factor weighs strongly in favor of the Co-Executors as well. Post-Banks, USVI Courts have already found that Section 908 of the Restatement is "the soundest rule for the Virgin Islands with respect to the imposition of an award of punitive damages." Pappas v. Hotel on the Cay Time-Sharing Ass'n, 69 V.I. 3, 15 n.8 (U.S.V.I. Super. Ct. 2015) (citing Christian, 46 V.I. 557 (D.V.I. App. Div. 2005), Isaac v. Crichlow, 63 V.I. 38, 2015 V.I. LEXIS 15 (V.I. Super. Ct. 2015), St. House, Inc. v. Barrows, 15 V.I. 435 (V.I. Terr. Ct. 1979), Brandy v. Flamboyant Inv. Co., Ltd., 24 V.I. 249 (V.I. Terr. Ct. 1989), and v. Rijos, 780 F. Supp. 2d 376, 380 (D.V.I. 2011)); Powell v. Chi-Co's Distrib., No. ST-13-TOR-14, 2014 V.I. LEXIS 21, at •5 n.13 (U.S.V.I. Super. Ct. Apr. 3, 2014) ("Applying a Banks analysis, the Court finds that Restatement (Second) of Torts § 908(2) reflects the common law of this jurisdiction."). + +Therefore, every Banks factor favors the Co-Executors: (1) pre-Banks, USVI courts expressed approval for the general rule that punitive damages cannot be recovered against a wrongdoer's estate; (2) the majority of courts from other jurisdictions preclude punitive damages against a wrongdoer's estate; and (3) post-Banks, USVI courts have held that Section 908 of the Restatement of Torts (Second) represents the soundest rule for the USVI with respect to the availability of punitive damages. + +\*\*\* + +In conclusion, even if any of Plaintiff's claims survive, her claim for punitive damages must be dismissed in its entirety. + +#### CONCLUSION + +For the reasons stated above, Defendants respectfully request that the Court dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint to the extent it is time-barred and Plaintiff's claim for punitive damages, together with such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper. + +Dated: New York, New York February 28, 2020 + +By: Is/ Bennet J. Moskowitz Bennet J. Moskowitz TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP 875 Third Avenue New York, New York 10022 + +Attorney for Defendants \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737274/EFTA02737274.metadata.json b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737274/EFTA02737274.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d5cbfdde62455bfdd0ddf7be092dc0c8891afe10 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737274/EFTA02737274.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,910 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737274.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 14, + "chars": 25975, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.91, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 192.168, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 418.4738464355469, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 418.4738464355469, + 100.10302734375 + ], + [ + 192.168, + 100.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFENDANTS' MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT \nOF THEIR MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 132.192, + 315.09000000000003 + ], + [ + 480.07025146484375, + 315.09000000000003 + ], + [ + 480.07025146484375, + 344.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 132.192, + 344.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "TABLE OF CONTENTS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 239.29200000000003, + 53.46 + ], + [ + 374.134521484375, + 53.46 + ], + [ + 374.134521484375, + 68.60302734375 + ], + [ + 239.29200000000003, + 68.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "TABLE OF AUTHORITIES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 229.5, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 383.5578918457031, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 383.5578918457031, + 86.60302734375 + ], + [ + 229.5, + 86.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Statutes", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 588.06 + ], + [ + 117.18220520019531, + 588.06 + ], + [ + 117.18220520019531, + 602.9830169677734 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 602.9830169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Other Authorities", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 174.14999999999998 + ], + [ + 167.42596435546875, + 174.14999999999998 + ], + [ + 167.42596435546875, + 189.43353271484375 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 189.43353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PRELIMINARY STATEMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 219.70799999999997, + 209.79000000000002 + ], + [ + 391.921630859375, + 209.79000000000002 + ], + [ + 391.921630859375, + 224.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 219.70799999999997, + 224.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "STATEMENT OF ALLEGED FACTS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 203.796, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 408.9711608886719, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 408.9711608886719, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 203.796, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A. Plaintiff Alleges Torts Occurring Over 15 Years Ago In New York And \nOther Jurisdictions, Starting When She Was Age Seventeen", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.87599999999998, + 97.19999999999999 + ], + [ + 511.01470947265625, + 97.19999999999999 + ], + [ + 511.01470947265625, + 125.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 105.87599999999998, + 125.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ARGUMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 440.6400000000001 + ], + [ + 344.63134765625, + 440.6400000000001 + ], + [ + 344.63134765625, + 455.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 455.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A. Legal Standard: Plaintiff's Legal Conclusions, Labels And Formulaic \nRecitations Of The Elements Of Her Causes Of Action Are Insufficient To \nState A Claim", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.87599999999998, + 465.75 + ], + [ + 527.1557006835938, + 465.75 + ], + [ + 527.1557006835938, + 508.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 105.87599999999998, + 508.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B. Most Of Plaintiff's Claims Expired Many Years Ago", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 209.79000000000002 + ], + [ + 416.322998046875, + 209.79000000000002 + ], + [ + 416.322998046875, + 224.60302734375 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 224.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "C. Plaintiff's Claim For Punitive Damages Fails As A Matter Of Law", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.87599999999998, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 485.7906188964844, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 485.7906188964844, + 334.8630676269531 + ], + [ + 105.87599999999998, + 334.8630676269531 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "3. Banks factor three: Post-Banks, USVI courts have favorably applied \nRestatement Section 908 to questions regarding punitive damages.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 140.76, + 237.32999999999998 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 237.32999999999998 + ], + [ + 544.068, + 265.863037109375 + ], + [ + 140.76, + 265.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CONCLUSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 154.71 + ], + [ + 350.49066162109375, + 154.71 + ], + [ + 350.49066162109375, + 169.18353271484375 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 169.18353271484375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 35 + ], + [ + "Line", + 18 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "TableOfContents", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "TableOfContents", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "TableOfContents", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 82 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 37 + ], + [ + "Line", + 19 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737274" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737288/EFTA02737288.md b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737288/EFTA02737288.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..544c1f920ee3976c51673dc0c96561ae38f6b76d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737288/EFTA02737288.md @@ -0,0 +1,151 @@ +## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK + +x + +Plaintiff, + +-against- + +DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, as EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, + +Defendants. + +x + +Case No. 19 Civ. 10788 (GHW)(DCF) + +## STIPULATED CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT AND PROTECTIVE ORDER + +WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendants Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (collectively, the "Parties" and each individually, a "Party"), request that this Court issue a protective order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) to protect the confidentiality of nonpublic and sensitive information that they may need to disclose in connection with discovery in this action; + +WHEREAS, the Parties, through counsel, agree to the following terms; and + +WHEREAS, this Court finds that good cause exists for issuance of an appropriately tailored confidentiality order governing the pretrial phase of this action; + +IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Parties to this action, their respective agents, employees, and attorneys, any other person in active concert or participation with any of the foregoing, and all other persons with actual notice of this Order will adhere to the following terms, upon pain of contempt: + +1. With respect to "Discovery Material" (i.e., documents, information or tangible things of any kind produced or disclosed in the course of discovery in this action) that a person has designated as "Confidential" pursuant to this Order, no person subject to this Order may disclose such Confidential Discovery Material to anyone else except as expressly permitted hereunder. + +2. The Party or person producing or disclosing Discovery Material (each, "Producing Party") may designate as Confidential only the portion of such material that it reasonably and in good faith believes consists of: + +- (a) medical, mental health and/or other health care records; +- (b) previously non-disclosed financial information; +- (c) any other material the Parties agree in writing is Confidential; +- (d) non-public information that the producing person in good faith considers to be, reflect, or reveal business, marketing, financial, or regulatory information or data, or information of commercial value, including, without limitation, trade secrets, contracts with third parties, or other information required by law or agreement to be kept confidential; or +- (e) any other category of information given confidential status by this Court after the date of this Order. + +3. With respect to the Confidential portion of any Discovery Material other than deposition transcripts and exhibits, the Producing Party or its counsel may designate such portion as "Confidential" by: (a) stamping or otherwise clearly marking as "Confidential" the protected portion in a manner that will not interfere with legibility or audibility; and (b) producing for + +future public use another copy of said Discovery Material with the confidential information redacted. + +4. A Producing Party or its counsel may designate deposition exhibits or portions of deposition transcripts as Confidential Discovery Material either by: (a) indicating on the record during the deposition that a question calls for Confidential information, in which case the reporter will bind the transcript of the designated testimony in a separate volume and mark it as "Confidential Information Governed by Protective Order;" or (b) notifying the reporter and all counsel of record, in writing, within 30 days after a deposition has concluded, of the specific pages and lines of the transcript that are to be designated "Confidential," in which case all counsel receiving the transcript will be responsible for marking the copies of the designated transcript in their possession or under their control as directed by the Producing Party or that person's counsel. During the 30-day period following a deposition, all Parties will treat the entire deposition transcript as if it had been designated Confidential. + +5. If at any time before the termination of this action a Producing Party realizes that it should have designated as Confidential some portion(s) of Discovery Material that it previously produced without limitation, the Producing Party may so designate such material by notifying all Parties in writing. Thereafter, all persons subject to this Order will treat such designated portion(s) of the Discovery Material as Confidential. In addition, the Producing Party shall provide each other Party with replacement versions of such Discovery Material that bears the "Confidential" designation within two business days of providing such notice. + +6. Nothing contained in this Order will be construed as: (a) a waiver by a Party or person of its right to object to any discovery request; (b) a waiver of any privilege or protection; or (c) a ruling regarding the admissibility at trial of any document, testimony, or other evidence. + +7. Where a Producing Party has designated Discovery Material as Confidential, other persons subject to this Order may disclose such information only to the following persons: + +(a) the Parties to this action; + +(b) counsel retained specifically for this action, including any paralegal, clerical, or other assistant that such outside counsel employs and assigns to this matter; + +(c) outside vendors or service providers (such as copy-service providers and document-management consultants) that counsel hire and assign to this matter, provided such person has first executed a Non-Disclosure Agreement in the form annexed as Exhibit A hereto; + +(d) any mediator or arbitrator that the Parties engage in this matter or that this Court appoints, provided such person has first executed a Non-Disclosure Agreement in the form annexed as Exhibit A hereto; + +(e) as to any document, its author, its addressee, and any other person indicated on the face of the document as having received a copy; + +(0 any witness who counsel for a Party in good faith believes may be called to testify at trial or deposition in this action, provided such person has first executed a Non-Disclosure Agreement in the form annexed as Exhibit A hereto; + +(g) any person a Party retains to serve as an expert witness or otherwise provide specialized advice to counsel in connection with this action, provided such person has first executed a Non-Disclosure Agreement in the form annexed as Exhibit A hereto; + +(h) stenographers engaged to transcribe depositions the Parties conduct in this action; and + +(i) this Court, including any appellate court, its support personnel, and court reporters. + +10. Before disclosing any Confidential Discovery Material to any person referred to in subparagraphs 7(c), 7(d), 7(f), or 7(g) above, counsel must provide a copy of this Order to such person, who must sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement in the form annexed as Exhibit A hereto stating that he or she has read this Order and agrees to be bound by its terms. Said counsel must retain each signed Non-Disclosure Agreement, hold it in escrow, and produce it to opposing counsel either before such person is permitted to testify (at deposition or trial) or at the conclusion of the case including any and all appeals, whichever comes first. + +11. This Order binds the Parties and certain others to treat as Confidential any Discovery Materials so classified. The Court has not, however, made any finding regarding the confidentiality of any Discovery Materials, and retains full discretion to determine whether to afford confidential treatment to any Discovery Material designated as Confidential hereunder. All persons are placed on notice that the Court is unlikely to seal or otherwise afford confidential treatment to any Discovery Material introduced into evidence at trial, even if such material has previously been sealed or designated as Confidential. + +12. In filing Confidential Discovery Material with this Court, or filing portions of any pleadings, motions, or other papers that disclose such Confidential Discovery Material ("Confidential Court Submission"), the Parties shall publicly file a redacted copy of the Confidential Court Submission via the Electronic Case Filing System. The Parties shall file an unredacted copy of the Confidential Court Submission under seal with the Clerk of this Court, and the Parties shall serve this Court and opposing counsel with unredacted courtesy copies of the Confidential Court Submission. Any Party that seeks to file Confidential Discovery Material + +under seal must file an application and supporting declaration justifying—on a particularized basis—the sealing of such documents. The parties should be aware that the Court will unseal documents if it is unable to make "specific, on the record findings ... demonstrating that closure is essential to preserve higher values and is narrowly tailored to serve that interest." Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 120 (2d Cir. 2006). Notwithstanding any other provision of this paragraph, if the parties stipulate that specific portions of a document are both confidential and immaterial to this lawsuit, a party may publicly file a version of the document with those confidential and immaterial portions redacted, and that party need not submit an unredacted version to the Court or file a motion to seal. + +13. Any Party who objects to any designation of confidentiality may at any time before the trial of this action serve upon counsel for the Producing Party a written notice stating with particularity the grounds of the objection. If the Parties cannot reach agreement promptly, counsel for all affected Parties will address their dispute to the Court by motion. The Parties shall treat the disputed materials as Confidential pending the Court's resolution of such motion. + +14. Any Party who requests additional limits on disclosure (such as "attorneys' eyes only" in extraordinary circumstances), may at any time before the trial of this action serve upon counsel for the recipient Parties a written notice stating with particularity the grounds of the request. If the Parties cannot reach agreement promptly, counsel for all affected Parties will address their dispute to the Court. + +15. Recipients of Confidential Discovery Material under this Order may use such material solely for the prosecution and defense of this action, any appeals thereto, and any alternative dispute resolution proceeding intended to resolve this action with prior express permission of the producing party, and not for any other purpose or in any other litigation + +proceeding. Nothing contained in this Order, however, will affect or restrict the rights of any Party with respect to its own documents or information produced in this action. Nor shall anything contained in this Order prejudice a Party's ability to seek discovery in this and any other legal proceeding, without prejudice to any other Party's right to object to such discovery. + +16. Nothing in this Order will prevent any Party from producing any Confidential Discovery Material in its possession in response to a lawful subpoena or other compulsory process, or if required to produce by law or by any government agency having jurisdiction, provided that, unless precluded by applicable laws or rules, such Party gives written notice to the Producing Party as soon as reasonably possible, and if permitted by the time allowed under the request, at least 10 days before any disclosure. Upon receiving such notice, the Producing Party will bear the burden to oppose compliance with the subpoena, other compulsory process, or other legal notice if the Producing Party deems it appropriate to do so. + +17. Each person who has access to Discovery Material designated as Confidential pursuant to this Order must take all reasonable precautions to prevent the unauthorized or inadvertent disclosure of such material. + +18. If a receiving party receives documents or other materials that it has reason to believe are subject to a good faith claim of attorney-client privilege, work product protection, or other privilege or immunity from disclosure, the receiving party must refrain from examining the documents or other materials any more than is essential to ascertain whether the documents or other materials are reasonably subject to such a claim. The receiving party shall promptly notify the producing person in writing that the receiving party possesses documents or other material that appears to be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. + +19. If, in connection with this litigation, a producing person inadvertently discloses information that is subject to a claim of attorney-client privilege, attorney work product protection, or any other privilege or immunity from disclosure ("Inadvertently Disclosed Information"), such disclosure shall not constitute or be deemed a waiver or forfeiture of any claim of privilege, work product protection, or other privilege or immunity from discovery with respect to the Inadvertently Disclosed Information or its subject matter. In addition, a producing person may use its own document (e.g., as a deposition exhibit) containing material that is subject to a claim of privilege or immunity from disclosure for the purpose of establishing the basis of such claim without waiver of any applicable privilege or immunity from disclosure, unless the producing person affirmatively uses or relies upon the specific material contained in the document that is subject to the claim of privilege or immunity from disclosure for any purpose other than establishing the basis of such claim. + +20. If a producing person makes a claim of inadvertent disclosure, the receiving party shall, within five business days, return or destroy all copies of the Inadvertently Disclosed Information, and provide a certification of counsel that all such information has been returned or destroyed, unless the receiving party seeks to dispute that the information is privileged or otherwise protected as set forth below. Until the dispute is resolved or ruled upon, the receiving party shall undertake to keep such information restricted solely for use in connection with the dispute over the privilege or protection. + +21. Within five business days after the notification that such Inadvertently Disclosed Information has been returned or destroyed, the producing person shall produce a privilege log with respect to the Inadvertently Disclosed Information. + +22. The receiving party may move the Court for an Order compelling production of the Inadvertently Disclosed Information. Pursuant to the parties' obligations set forth herein, the motion shall not quote or paraphrase the substance of the document subject to the motion to compel beyond the description of the document contained in the privilege log entry for the document. The motion shall be filed under seal, and shall not assert as a ground for entering such an Order the fact or circumstances of the inadvertent production in this action. + +23. The producing person retains the burden of establishing the privileged or protected nature of any Inadvertently Disclosed Information. Nothing in this Order shall limit the right of any producing person or receiving party to request an in camera review of the Inadvertently Disclosed Information. + +24. Within 60 days of the final disposition of this action—including all appeals—all recipients of Confidential Discovery Material must either return it—including all copies thereof—to the Producing Party, or destroy such material—including all copies thereof. In either event, by the 60-day deadline, the recipient must certify its return or destruction by submitting a written certification to the Producing Party that affirms that it has not retained any copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries, or other forms of reproducing or capturing any of the Confidential Discovery Material. Notwithstanding the foregoing: (i) Discovery Materials that have been received electronically and that cannot be returned or destroyed must be electronically deleted and deleted from "trash" files, and the recipient must take reasonable measures to ensure that unauthorized persons do not have access to Confidential information residing on the recipient's computer server and back-up media; and (ii) outside counsel for the parties are permitted to retain one archival copy of all pleadings, motion papers, court filings made under seal, transcripts, legal memoranda, correspondence, attorney work product, written discovery + +responses, deposition and trial exhibits, and expert reports, even if such materials contain Confidential Discovery Material, subject to a continuing obligation to protect information designated Confidential pursuant to this Order. + +25. This Order will survive the termination of the litigation and will continue to be binding upon all persons subject to this Order to whom Confidential Discovery Material is produced or disclosed. + +26. This Court will retain jurisdiction over all persons subject to this Order to the extent necessary to enforce any obligations arising hereunder or to impose sanctions for any contempt thereof. + +SO STIPULATED AND AGREED. + +TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP + +/s/ Bennet J. Moskowitz Bennet J. Moskowitz 875 Third Avenue New York, New York 10022 (212) 704-6000 bennet.moskowitz@troutman.com + +Attorneys for Defendants Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein + +Dated: March 16, 2020 + +SO ORDERED. + +Dated: New York, New York + +CUTI HECKER WANG LLP + +/s/ Mariann Meier Wang Mariann Meier Wang 305 Broadway, Suite 607 New York, New York 10007 (212) 620-2603 mwang@chwIlp.com + +Attorneys for Plaintiff + +Dated: March 16, 2020 + +## Exhibit A to Stipulated Confidentiality Agreement and Protective Order + +UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK + +x + +Plaintiff. + +-against- + +DARREN K. INDYICE and RICHARD D. KAHN, as EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. Ea + +Defendants. + +x + +Case No. 19 Civ. 10788 (GHWXDCF) + +NON-DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT + +, acknowledge that I have read and understand the Protective Order in this action governing the non-disclosure of those portions of Discovery Material that have been designated as Confidential. I agree that I will not disclose such Confidential Discovery Material to anyone other than for purposes of this litigation and that at the conclusion of the litigation I will return all discovery information to the Party or attorney from whom I received it. By acknowledging these obligations under the Protective Order, I understand that I am submitting myself to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York for the purpose of any issue or dispute arising hereunder and that my willful violation of any term of the Protective Order could subject me to punishment for contempt of Court. + +Date: \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737288/EFTA02737288.metadata.json b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737288/EFTA02737288.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e18b10ce991d372e18dc6668ad95beb6f94987b9 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737288/EFTA02737288.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,470 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737288.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 12, + "chars": 18832, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.37, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.768, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 282.5284118652344, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 282.5284118652344, + 101.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 69.768, + 101.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "STIPULATED CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT AND PROTECTIVE ORDER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 319.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 526.4879150390625, + 319.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 526.4879150390625, + 335.60302734375 + ], + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 335.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Exhibit A \nto Stipulated Confidentiality \nAgreement and Protective Order", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 380.664, + 85.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 544.6800000000001, + 85.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 544.6800000000001, + 128.60302734375 + ], + [ + 380.664, + 128.60302734375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 48 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 21 + ], + [ + "Line", + 11 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737288" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737300/EFTA02737300.md b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737300/EFTA02737300.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..aea031c0db3180fa7bc8936754d2c13f6ac0ae4f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737300/EFTA02737300.md @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@ +March 16, 2020 + +By ECF + +Hon. Debra Freeman + +U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York + +Daniel Moynihan + +United States Courthouse + +500 Pearl St. + +New York, NY 10007-1312 + +Re: v. Indyke et at, 19-cv-10788 (GHW)(DCF) + +Your Honor: + +We represent Plaintiff . With the consent of all parties, we write respectfully to request a one-week extension of the briefing deadlines for the Defendants' pending motion to dismiss (ECF 26). + +Plaintiffs opposition papers are currently due on March 20 and Defendants' reply papers are currently due on March 30. We request a one-week extension of both of those deadlines, so that Plaintiffs opposition papers would be due on March 27 and Defendants' reply papers would be due on April 7. This extension of time is needed due to challenges arising from COVID-19 response measures, including school and office closures. + +We have conferred with Bennet J. Moskowitz, counsel for Defendants, and he consents to this extension. This extension would not affect any other deadlines in this case. No previous extension of time has been requested since Your Honor entered the parties' proposed briefing schedule on February 28, 2020 (ECF 25). + +We appreciate Your Honor's attention to this matter. + +Very truly yours, + +/s/ Mariann Meier Wang + +Mariann Meier Wang \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737300/EFTA02737300.metadata.json b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737300/EFTA02737300.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a00da850c501c6178905b36ebf08ff6b02442a68 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737300/EFTA02737300.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,58 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737300.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1295, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.99, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737300" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737301/EFTA02737301.md b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737301/EFTA02737301.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ca714a993e38b26aa8782d732da236b952d9c6ca --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737301/EFTA02737301.md @@ -0,0 +1,85 @@ +UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT +SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK + +![](_page_0_Picture_45.jpeg) + +Plaintiff, + +Case No. 1:19-cv-10788-GHW-DCF + +-against- + +DARREN INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, as +executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, + +Defendant. + +NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS + +TO: ATTORNEY SERVICES CLERK AND ALL OTHER PARTIES + +![](_page_0_Picture_53.jpeg) + +I have cases pending + +![](_page_0_Picture_55.jpeg) + +I have no cases pending + +Pursuant to Local Rule 1.3 of this Court, please take notice of the following attorney information change (s) for: + +Mary "Molly" S. DiRago + +FILL IN ATTORNEY NAME + +My SDNY Bar Number is: \_\_\_\_\_ My State Bar Number is 6282757 + +I am, + +![](_page_0_Picture_62.jpeg) + +An attorney + +![](_page_0_Picture_64.jpeg) + +A Government Agency attorney + +![](_page_0_Picture_66.jpeg) + +A Pro Hac Vice attorney + +FIRM INFORMATION (Include full name of firm (OLD AND NEW), address, telephone number and fax number): + +OLD FIRM: + +FIRM NAME: TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP + +FIRM ADDRESS: One North Wacker Drive, Suite 2905 Chicago, IL 60606 + +FIRM TELEPHONE NUMBER: (312)759-1926 + +FIRM FAX NUMBER: (312)759-1939 + +NEW FIRM: + +FIRM NAME: TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP + +FIRM ADDRESS: 227 W. Monroe Street, Suite 3900, Chicago, IL 60606 + +FIRM TELEPHONE NUMBER: (312)759-1926 + +FIRM FAX NUMBER: (312)759-1939 + +![](_page_0_Picture_79.jpeg) + +I will continue to be counsel of record on the above-entitled case at my new firm/agency. + +![](_page_0_Picture_81.jpeg) + +I am no longer counsel of record on the above-entitled case. An order withdrawing my appearance was entered on \_\_\_\_\_ by Judge \_\_\_\_\_. + +Dated: 03/20/2020 + +/s/ Mary "Molly" S. DiRago + +ATTORNEY'S SIGNATURE \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737301/EFTA02737301.metadata.json b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737301/EFTA02737301.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8b1ae3890f9ff019597e6f441aedb536d14efb8f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737301/EFTA02737301.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,114 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737301.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1656, + "elapsed_seconds": 8.58, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_0_Picture_45.jpeg", + "_page_0_Picture_53.jpeg", + "_page_0_Picture_55.jpeg", + "_page_0_Picture_62.jpeg", + "_page_0_Picture_64.jpeg", + "_page_0_Picture_66.jpeg", + "_page_0_Picture_79.jpeg", + "_page_0_Picture_81.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 244.188, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 244.188, + 94.77000000000001 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 94.77000000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 190.35 + ], + [ + 384.948, + 190.35 + ], + [ + 384.948, + 200.88 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 200.88 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 71 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737301" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737301/_page_0_Picture_45.jpeg b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737301/_page_0_Picture_45.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..dbbf7b05934edd934e5dd262f49cefb7749a988c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737301/_page_0_Picture_45.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:6debdb8dc53b76895e5f6b9037a1e155f26738027876ed71dc4802a34581bc2a +size 1179 diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737301/_page_0_Picture_53.jpeg b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737301/_page_0_Picture_53.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..575a4e21f1115a79fdfa0a4951fb9ff8c061d0e3 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737301/_page_0_Picture_53.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:ade830ca3bcd1ca3f29f3c0262e9d28b97f94f7357a12bcf744bc7ff00924791 +size 1092 diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737301/_page_0_Picture_55.jpeg b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737301/_page_0_Picture_55.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e4c9a4ac5b6ad2cdf9184058ee6bd328f74dba48 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737301/_page_0_Picture_55.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:eb7983d31519dd70fcceb72ee56ce42e6c84bb7269e140ed109157581bd9933a +size 942 diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737301/_page_0_Picture_62.jpeg b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737301/_page_0_Picture_62.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0f0ebdc9a7dc6fe99f76b6e3ca0a18f8f21e32aa --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737301/_page_0_Picture_62.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:38c87a48fd60cfd04c41e245dee5e721d65f4ab0ca8fe76e677204ce65b22395 +size 950 diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737301/_page_0_Picture_64.jpeg b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737301/_page_0_Picture_64.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c85e3669c3a3d0c68aa6b487c62b1e3b6e449b05 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737301/_page_0_Picture_64.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:153169216fa75a5bdd5269ad943185aa5cac4198dde94e404a39f7a4ca422322 +size 971 diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737301/_page_0_Picture_66.jpeg b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737301/_page_0_Picture_66.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..184859c7bb24acc9ec1ffaf5d23936fc90308aaa --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737301/_page_0_Picture_66.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:26be5981c2a81b659ccb807ed511cca146079291a921b15d70179bade27b3d34 +size 1077 diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737301/_page_0_Picture_79.jpeg b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737301/_page_0_Picture_79.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5d07dd39e8a640be834be662df000c4d2b9b4e2d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737301/_page_0_Picture_79.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:b2d3016b68bd3feb2cf93758542b88c17174a25c11189f5df123e53271836275 +size 1101 diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737301/_page_0_Picture_81.jpeg b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737301/_page_0_Picture_81.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..015211fbe98ae747a59e7e1baac3ea76d363d8cc --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737301/_page_0_Picture_81.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:1db359ed8ca4c2bd7d4a6a6b087f1c547160393c822b22a01eccad96cb1bb69e +size 960 diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737302/EFTA02737302.md b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737302/EFTA02737302.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..531ea90205e6fe3ac5dd1bfbe69219f7e43142f9 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737302/EFTA02737302.md @@ -0,0 +1,179 @@ +## EXHIBIT A + +**LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT +OF +JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN** + +19 AUG 15 PM 10:10 + +I, JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, a resident and domiciliary of St. [REDACTED], United States Virgin Islands, do make, publish and declare this to be my Will hereby revoking all prior Wills and Codicils made by me. + +1: I direct my Executor to pay from my estate all expenses of my last illness, my funeral and burial expenses, the administration expenses of my estate and all of my debts duly proven and allowed against my estate. + +A. I direct my Executor to pay from my estate, as compensation to each Executor for serving as Executor hereunder, the sum of Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars (\$250,000) to each Executor upon the completion of probate of my estate. No Executor shall receive any other compensation for serving as Executor hereunder; provided, however, that my Executor shall be reimbursed from my estate for all reasonable costs, expenses, charges, and liabilities incurred or paid in respect thereto, including fees and expenses of counsel or any other agents hired by my Executor, and my Executor shall not be liable therefor individually. + +B. I direct my Executor to pay from my estate the federal and state transfer taxes described in Paragraph B(1) of Article SEVENTH. + +C. I direct my Executor to pay from my estate all expenses of storing, insuring, packing, shipping and delivering my tangible personal property in accordance with the provisions of Article SECOND. + +2: I give all of my property, real and personal, wherever situated, after the payments and distributions provided in Article FIRST, to the then acting Trustees of The 1953 Trust ("Trust") created under that certain Trust Agreement of The 1953 Trust (the "Trust Agreement") dated August 8, 2019, as the same may be amended from time to time, to be held in accordance with the provisions comprising the Trust Agreement at the time of my death. + +3: I appoint DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN to serve as the Executors of this Will. If any one or more of my Executors fails to qualify, is unable or unwilling to serve or ceases to act, I appoint BORIS NIKOLIC, as successor Executor. If any successor Executor fails to qualify, is unable or unwilling to serve or ceases to act, I authorize the last acting Executor to designate his or her successor. Such designation shall be made by written instrument delivered to such designated successor Executor. + +A. If my estate must be administered in whole or in part in any jurisdiction other than the state or territory of my domicile at the date of my death, and if my Executor is unable or unwilling to serve in such jurisdiction, then I appoint the successor Executor of my estate designated in Paragraph A of Article THIRD as successor Executor in such + +Last Will do Testament of Jeffrey E Epstein Pure2ofil + +Executor jurisdiction or only, successor provided Executor that he or she is able and willing to serve in such jurisdiction. If no designate a is able and willing to serve in such jurisdiction, my Executor shall written instrument successor delivered Executor to serve in such jurisdiction. Such designation shall be made by to such successor Executor. + +in any jurisdiction. B. No bond or other security shall be required of any Executor + +governing statutes of C. Any Executor may resign in the manner pmvided for by the in the absence of the state or territory• having jurisdiction of the administration of my estate or having jurisdiction such of statutory guidance, by filing a written notice of resignation with the Court entitled to any compensation the administration of my estate. Any Executor who resigns shall not be resignation. hereunder for any services rendered as Executor prior to his or her + +D. My Executor shall not be accountable or responsible person interested to any declines to exercise in my estate for the manner in which my Executor in good faith exercises or liable for any loss or any depreciation discretionary authority or power of my Executor. My Executor shall not be of judgment in entering in value occasioned by reason of any negligence, error or mistake into any transaction, in making any sale or investment, hold any property or by in continuing to fiduciary, unless my Executor reason of any action or omission, whether by my Executor or any other evidence to has acted in bad faith. In the absence of proof by affirmative Executor's authority, the contrary, each Executor shall be deemed to have acted within the scope of my impartially as to all to have exercised reasonable care, diligence and prudence and to have acted another Executor. interested persons. An Executor shall not be liable for the acts or defaults of + +Executor, except 4: as The following provisions shall apply to my estate and to my is otherwise specifically provided in this Will: + +my estate. My Executor has A. My Executor has the entire care and custody of all assets of without necessity of any the power to do everything my Executor in good faith deems advisable not be authorized or judicial authorization or approval, even though but for this power it would Executor shall exercise appropriate my Executor's for fiduciaries under any statutory or other rule of law. My to be in the best best judgment and discretion for what my Executor believes in this Will, if interests of the beneficiaries hereunder. Except as otherwise specifically provided two Executors are empowered to participate exercise any fiduciary power in the decision to exercise or not to Executors acting unanimously. granted by this Will or by law, such decision shall be made by such If more than two Executors arc empowered decision to exercise or not to participate in the such Executors shall be empowered exercise any fiduciary power granted by this Will or by law, a majority of to make such decision. + +the power: B. Except as otherwise provided herein, my Executor shall have + +assets of my estate and collect to enter upon and take possession of the such assets in real, personal the income and profits from such assets, and to invest and reinvest or mixed assets (including the common trust funds of acorporate + +Last Will & Testament of Jeffrey E. Epstein Page 3 of 11 + +fiduciary) or in undivided interests therein without being limited by any present or future investment laws; + +(2) to retain all or any pan of the assets of my estate (without regard to the proportion that any one asset or class of assets may bear to the whole) in the form in which such assets were received or acquired by my Executor; + +(3) to sell or dispose of, exchange, transfer, invest Executor or loan all or any part of the assets of my estate which may, at any time, be held by my for such sums or upon such terms as to payment, security or otherwise as my Executor determines, either by public or private transactions; + +(4) to buy and sell options, warrants, puts, calls or other rights to purchase or sell (collectively "options") relating to any security or securities, regardless of whether such security or securities arc then held by my Executor, and whether such options options are purchased or sold on a national securities exchange, and to exercise with respect to such all powers which an individual owner thereof could exercise, including, without limitation, the right to allow the same to expire; + +(5) with respect to oil, natural gas, minerals, and all other natural resources and rights to and interests therein (together with all equipment pertaining thereto), including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, oil and gas royalties, leases, or other oil and gas interests of any character, whether owned in fee, as lessee, lessor, licensee, concessionaire or otherwise, or alone or jointly with others as partner, joint tenant, or joint venture in any other noncorporate manner, (a) to make oil, gas and mineral leases or subleases; (b) to pay delay rentals, lease bonuses, royalties, overriding royalties, taxes, assessments, and all other charges; (c) to sell, lease, exchange, mortgage, pledge or otherwise hypothecate any or all of such rights and interests; (d) to surrender or abandon, with or without consideration, any or all of such rights and interests; (e) to make farm-out, pooling, and unitization agreements; (0 to make reservations or impose conditions on the transfer of any such rights or interests; (g) to employ the most advantageous business form in which properly to exploit such rights and interests, whether as corporations, partnerships, limited partnerships, mining partnerships, limited liability companies, joint ventures, co-tenancies, or otherwise exploit any and all such rights and interests; (h) to produce, process, sell or exchange all products recovered through the exploitation of such rights and operation interests, and to enter into contracts and agreements for or in respect of the installation or of absorption, reprocessing or other processing plants; () to carry any or all such interests in the name or names of a nominee or nominees; (j) to delegate, to the extent permitted by law, any or all of the powers set forth herein to the operator of such property; and (k) to employ personnel, rent office space, buy or lease office equipment, contract and pay for geological surveys and studies, procure appraisals, and generally to conduct and engage in any and all activities incident to the foregoing powers, with full power to borrow and pledge in order to finance such activities; together i s with the power to allocate between principal and income any netproceeds received as consideration, whether as royalties or otherwise, for the permanent natural from lands of oil, gas, minerals, and all other natural resources; + +(6) to hold all or any part of the assets of my estate in cash or in bank accounts without the necessity of investing the same; + +Last Will & Testament of Jeffrey E. Epstein Page4ofll + +all or any part of (7) to improve, repair, partition, plat or subdivide the assets of my estate; + +abandon or submit (8) to litigate, defend, compromise, settle, claims in favor of or to against arbitration my on such terms and conditions as my Executor determines any estate or the assets of my estate; + +and upon such (9) to loan or borrow money in such amounts such guarantees terms as my and Executor conditions as my Executor determines, assume such obligations or give determines, for the purpose of the acquisition, protection, improvement, beneficiaries retention of my estate; or preservation of the assets of my estate, or for the welfare of the + +my Executor determines (10) to carry on for as long and in such manner as individually, or as apartner, any member, business enterprise in which I owned any interest at my death, either joint venture, stockholder or trust beneficiary; business enterprise as to sell such undertake any other an ongoing business; to consolidate, merge, encumber, dissolve, liquidate or extraordinary corporate transaction relating to such business enterprise; + +or securities and (11) to vote in person or by proxy any and all capital or debt readjustment to become aparty to any voting trusts, reorganization, consolidation or other of any corporation, association, partnership, partnership, limited liability my estate; limited liability company or individual with respect to stocks, securities or debts held by + +(21) of this Article Fourth, (12) except as provided for in Sections (20) and or with any corporation, to enter into any good faith transactions with any Executor individually interest; partnership or other entity in which any Executor has an ownership + +bonds, securities, (13) To purchase from my estate any stocks, the same person or real persons or personal property, or other assets, or make loans to my estate even though estate; occupy the office of my Trustee and the office of the Executor of my + +interest in or otherwise (14) to lease, mortgage, pledge, grant a security whether or not beyond encumber all or any pan of the assets of my estate for any term of years the benefit of any of the duration of my estate (including, without limitation, any such action for the beneficiaries of my estate); + +personal, which my Executor may deem worthless (15) to abandon any property of my estate, real or protecting; to abstain from or not of sufficient value to warrant keeping or repairs, maintaining or the payment of taxes, water rents or assessments and to forego making sale or other proceedings keeping up any such property; and to permit such property to be lost by tax consideration so as or to convey any such property for anominal consideration or without thereof; to prevent the imposition of any liability by reason of the continued ownership + +Last Will & Testament of E. Epstein Page 5 of + +(16) to elect the mode of distribution of the proceeds payable to my estate from any profit-sharing plan, pension plan, employee benefit plan, individual retirement plan, insurance contract or annuity contract pursuant to the terms of such plan; + +(17) to allocate, in my Executors discretion, any adjustment to basis provided to my estate under the provisions of Federal and State law with respect to property comprising my estate, without any obligation to make acompensatory adjustment among the beneficiaries hereunder on account of such allocation; + +(18) to conduct any audit, assessment or investigation with respect to any asset of my estate regarding compliance with any law or regulation having as its object protection of public health, natural resources or the environment ("Environmental Laws"); to pay from the assets of my estate to remedy any failure to comply with any Environmental Law (even to the exhaustion of all of the assets of my estate); and, as may be required in my Executor's judgment by any Environmental Law, to notify any governmental authority of any past, present or future non-compliance with any Environmental Law; and + +(19) to sell to the Trustee under the Trust Agreement any stocks, bonds, securities, real or personal property or other assets or borrow from the Trustee under the Trust Agreement even though the same person or persons occupy the office of the Executor of my estate and the Trustee under the Trust Agreement. + +(20) No executor shall directly or indirectly buy or sell any property for the estate from or to himself, or from or to his relative, employer, employee, partner, or other business associate. + +(21) No executor shall lend estate funds to himself, or to his relative, employer, employee, partner, or other business associate. + +C. Except as otherwise provided herein, my Executor shall have the power. + +(I) to employ agents, attorneys-at-law, consultants, investment advisers (to whom my Executor has discretion to delegate my Executor's investment authority and responsibility), other executors and other fiduciaries in the administration of my Executor's duties; to delegate to such persons, or to one or more of my Executors, the custody, control or management of any pan of my estate as my Executor determines and to pay for such services from the assets of my estate, without obtaining judicial authorization or approval; + +or (2) to delegate, in whole or in part, to any person withdrawal persons the authority and power to (a) sign checks, drafts or orders for the payment or of funds, securities and other assets from any bank, brokerage, custody or other account in which funds, securities or other assets of my estate shall be deposited, (b) endorse for sale, transfer or deliviimor sell, transfer or deliver, or purchase or otherwise acquire, any and all property, stocks, warrants, rights, options, bonds or other securities whatsoever, (c) gain which access may to any safe deposit box or boxes in which my assets or assets of my estate may be located or be in the name of my Executor and remove part or all of the contents of any such safe + +Last Will & Testament of Jeffrey E. Epstein +Page 6 of 11 + +deposit box or boxes and release and surrender the same, and (d) take any other action that my Executor may have the power to take with respect to my estate and the property thereof; no person or corporation acting in reliance on any such delegation shall be charged with notice of any revocation or change of such delegation unless such person or corporation receives actual notice thereof; + +(3) to pay any property distributable to a beneficiary under a legal disability or who has not attained the age of 21, without liability to my Executor, by paying such property (a) to such beneficiary, (b) for the use of such beneficiary, (c) to a legal representative of such beneficiary appointed by a court or if none, to a relative for the use of such beneficiary, or (d) to a custodian for such beneficiary designated by my Executor, to hold until age 21 or such earlier age as shall be the maximum permitted under applicable law; + +(4) to distribute to any of the beneficiaries of my estate in kind or in cash, or partly in kind and partly in cash, and to allocate different kinds or disproportionate shares of assets or undivided interests in assets among all of such beneficiaries; + +(5) to have evidence of ownership of any security maintained in the records of a Federal Reserve Bank under the Federal Reserve Book Entry System; to deposit funds in any bank or trust company; to carry in the name of my Executor or the nominee or nominees of my Executor and with or without designation of fiduciary capacity, or to hold in bearer form, securities or other property requiring or permitting of registration; and to cause any securities to be held by a depository corporation of which an Executor is a member or by an agent under a safekeeping contract; provided, however, that the books and records of my Executor shall at all times show that such investments are part of my estate; + +(6) to renounce and disclaim, in whole or in part, and in accordance with applicable law, any assets, interests, rights or powers (including any power of appointment) which are payable to (or exercisable by) me or my estate, which are includible in my estate or Gross Estate or over which I have any right, title, interest or power; and + +(7) to make, execute and deliver any and all such instruments in writing as shall be necessary or proper to carry out any power, right, duty or obligation of my Executor or any disposition whatsoever of my estate or any asset of my estate and to exercise any and all other powers incidental or necessary to carry out or to fulfill the terms, provisions and purposes of my estate. + +D. In connection with any insurance policy or annuity on the life of an Executor which is included in my estate, such Executor shall not participate in the decision to exercise or not exercise any fiduciary power in connection with any incidents of ownership for such policy or annuity, including, without limitation, any decision to continue, assign, terminate or convert such policy or annuity or to name the beneficiary of such policy or annuity. + +E. An Executor hereunder may by a written notice delivered to the other Executor decline to participate in the decision to exercise or not exercise any fiduciary power granted by this Will or by law. + +F. If an Executor is not empowered (because of a conflict of + +Last Will & Testament of Jeffrey E. Epstein +Page 7 of 11 + +interest, declination to act or otherwise) to participate in the decision to exercise or not exercise any fiduciary power granted by this Will or by law, then the remaining Executor shall be empowered to make such decision. If no Executor is empowered to participate in such decision, then the successor Executor of my estate designated in Paragraph A of Article THIRD and able and willing to act shall be empowered to make such decision. If no Executor or successor Executor is empowered to participate in such decision, my Executor may designate a successor Executor to serve as Executor of my estate who shall be empowered to make such decision but shall have no other power or authority of my Executor. Such designation shall be by written notice delivered to such successor Executor. + +G. Except as otherwise specifically provided in this Paragraph G(1) of this Article, and except as provided in Paragraph G(2) of this Article, my Executor shall allocate receipts and disbursements in accordance with sound trust accounting principles and shall have discretion to allocate receipts and disbursements when the treatment is uncertain under applicable laws or generally accepted accounting principles in the judgment of my Executor. + +(1) Except as otherwise specifically provided in this Will, my Executor shall not treat any part of the principal amount of the proceeds of sale of any asset of my estate as income distributable to or for the benefit of any beneficiary entitled to distributions of income; provided, however, that my Executor shall treat a portion of any proceeds of sale of any financial instrument originally issued or acquired at a discount equal to the amount which (a) has previously been characterized as ordinary income for income tax purposes or (b) will be characterized as ordinary income for income tax purposes in the year of such sale, as income for trust accounting purposes. + +5: Where a party to any proceeding with respect to my estate has the same interest as a person under a disability, it shall not be necessary to serve legal process on the person under a disability. + +6: If any beneficiary under the Trust shall in any way directly or indirectly (a) contest or object to the probate of my Will or to the validity of any disposition or provision of my Will or of the Trust or (b) institute or prosecute, or be in any way directly or indirectly instrumental in the institution or prosecution of, any action, proceeding, contest, objection or claim for the purpose of setting aside or invalidating my Will or the Trust or any disposition therein or provision thereof, then I direct that (a) any and all provisions in the Trust for such beneficiary and his issue in any degree shall be null and void and (b) my estate, whether passing under my Will or the Trust or pursuant to the laws of intestacy, shall be disposed of as if such beneficiary and his issue in any degree had all failed to survive me. + +7: A. As used herein: + +(1) The term "Executor" of a person's estate means all persons or entities who occupy the office of executor, administrator, personal representative, or ancillary administrator while such persons or entities occupy such office, whether one or more persons or entities occupy such office at the same time or times, and includes any + +Last Will & Testament of Jeffrey E.. Lpsttin Page 8 of It + +successor the office or of successors Trustee under to that office. The term "Trustee" means all persons or entities who occupy whether one or more the Trust Agreement while such persons or entities occupy such office, includes any successor persons Trustee or entities occupy the office of Trustee at the same time or times, and that person's estate which or Trustees. A reference to aperson's estate or probate estate means such person's Last Will is subject to probate administration. A reference to aperson's Will means and Testament and any Codicil or Codicils thereto. + +the Internal Revenue Code of (2) The term "IRC section" means asection of Internal Revenue 1986, as amended, or the corresponding provision of any successor law, as in effect as of the date of my death. + +interest or penalties (3) A reference to any tax also includes any estate as finally determined thereon. A reference to aperson's "Gross Estate" means such person's gross for purposes of computing such person's federal estate tax. + +(4) Whenever same shall include the singular number is used, the genders. the plural, and the masculine gender shall include the feminine and neuter + +Executor shall be obligated B. The federal and state transfer taxes which my federal and state estate, to pay pursuant to Paragraph B of Article FIRST shall consist of all generation skipping inheritance, succession, and similar taxes (including any federal or state respect to all assets which transfer tax) imposed upon my probate estate or by reason of my death in of this Article, all pass under this Will or the Trust Agreement. Subject to Paragraph B(2) Agreement federal estate taxes with respect to assets not passing under this Will or the Trust estate taxes (such with assets are referred to as the "Apportionment Assets') and any applicable state interested in respect to the Apportionment Assets shall be apportioned among all persons federal estate the taxes Apportionment and Assets. My Executor shall make reasonable efforts to collect all state estate, inheritance, Apportionment Assets succession and similar taxes allocable to the apportionment of from the recipients of the Apportionment Assets. Without changing the pay all or part of such taxes in this Paragraph B(1), my Executor has discretion, but is not required, to pays such taxes taxes allocable to the Apportionment Assets. To the extent my Executor such taxes from allocable to the Apportionment Assets, my Executor shall sack reimbursement for liable for any of the recipients of the Apportionment Assets. My Executor shall not be personally reimbursement) such from taxes any if my Executor is unable, with reasonable efforts, to collect payment (or allocable to such assets. recipient of any Apportionment Assets for any or all of such taxes + +Trustee of the Trust Agreement (I) My Executor has discretion to direct the to pay all or any portion of the taxes which my Executor or obligated to pay pursuant is directed written direction delivered to Paragraph B of Article FIRST and this Paragraph B pursuant to a Executor directs the Trustee to the Trustee under the Trust Agreement. Any taxes which my trusts under the Trust Agreement under the Trust Agreement to pay shall be allocated and paid from the as provided under the Trust Agreement. + +C. Except as otherwise specifically provided bequest or devise to an in this Will, a the contrary. individual who does not survive me shall lapse notwithstanding any law to + +Last Will & Testament of Jeffrey E. Epstein +Page 9 of 11 + +D. To the extent that the distribution to the Trustee under the Trust Agreement pursuant to Article SECOND shall not be effective, I give all the rest of my property, real and personal, wherever situated, after the payments and distributions provided in Article FIRST, to the person or persons named as Trustee or Trustees under the Trust Agreement, be to held in trust under this Will in accordance with the provisions comprising the Trust Agreement at the time of my death, which provisions are incorporated in this Will by reference. + +IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have duly executed this Will this 8th day of August, 2019. + +Last Will & Testament of Jeffrey E. Epstein +Page 10 of 11 + +The foregoing instrument, consisting of eleven (11) pages, was signed in our presence by Jeffrey E. Epstein and was declared by him to be his last Will. We, at the request of and in the presence of Jeffrey E. Epstein and in the presence of each other, have subscribed our names below as witnesses. We declare that we are of sound mind and of the proper age to witness a will, that to the best of our knowledge the testator is of the age of majority, or is otherwise legally competent to make a will, and appears of sound mind and under no undue influence or constraint. Under penalty of perjury, we declare these statements are true and correct on this 8th day of August, 2019 at New York, New York. + +Last Will & Testament of Jeffrey E. Epstein Page it 0111 + +## AFFIDAVIT + +We, Jeffrey E. Epstein, tA.CokoA tkifti aithgrd and .r47/ signed to the attached the Testator and the witnesses respectively, whose names are instrument authority and in those capacities, personally appearing before the undersigned perjury that the first Testator being duly declared, sworn, do hereby declare to the undersigned authority under penalty of willingly; he/she executed signed, and executed the instrument as his last will; he signed it each of the witnesses, at it as his free and voluntary act for the purposes therein expressed; and presence of each other, signed the request of the Testator, in his or her hearing and presence, and in the the will as witness and that to the best of his or her knowledge the or testator undue was influence. at that time eighteen (18) years of age or older, of sound mind and under no constraint + +1401, Cf2' residing at residing at JEFpRLIV E. EPSTEIN C9O MAR AelPt trooktyvi Ny Ilan( 445 \*MOP Cr' It' .6220PL11, NY Nen + +STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK )ss: + +Subscribed and sworn to before mei\_by\_WiFFREY E. EPSTEIN, known to me or who the Testator, who is personally awitness who has produced nwatel.ws as identification, and by hisIzma- A.Can.. Mac is personally known to me or who has produced and 60-dotta as identification, as identification, on --raj August awitness who is personally known to me or who has produced 8, 2019. + +Sworn to before me this 86 day of August, 201. + +Notary Public + +blARLANA A. MUM= Play PAW,tlsrsdNw Yee }let EISCAY71741 Quitiald is New Ye& Candy Canainies ISM Mk 2044- \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737302/EFTA02737302.metadata.json b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737302/EFTA02737302.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0eff039d9418fbe7a07513d51b99adfa27acbc1e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737302/EFTA02737302.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,486 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737302.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 12, + "chars": 29343, + "elapsed_seconds": 13.29, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 181.76399999999998, + 325.62 + ], + [ + 438.52508544921875, + 325.62 + ], + [ + 438.52508544921875, + 376.4027099609375 + ], + [ + 181.76399999999998, + 376.4027099609375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 204.40800000000002, + 85.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 400.248, + 85.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 400.248, + 152.28 + ], + [ + 204.40800000000002, + 152.28 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "AFFIDAVIT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 272.34000000000003, + 124.74 + ], + [ + 338.7902526855469, + 124.74 + ], + [ + 338.7902526855469, + 136.89000000000001 + ], + [ + 272.34000000000003, + 136.89000000000001 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 3 + ], + [ + "Line", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 655 + ], + [ + "Line", + 80 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 643 + ], + [ + "Line", + 19 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 558 + ], + [ + "Line", + 72 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 560 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 695 + ], + [ + "Line", + 88 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 205 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 372 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737302" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737314/EFTA02737314.md b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737314/EFTA02737314.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..883b0b00c67fb583299bffcce8b910e49daa83aa --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737314/EFTA02737314.md @@ -0,0 +1,907 @@ +# EXHIBIT B + +IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS +DIVISION OF ST. [REDACTED] AND ST. JOHN + +GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES +VIRGIN ISLANDS, + +Case No.: + +PLAINTIFF, + +**ACTION FOR DAMAGES** + +V. + +DARREN K. INDYKE, in his capacity as the +EXECUTOR FOR THE ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. +EPSTEIN and ADMINISTRATOR OF THE 1953 +TRUST; RICHARD D. KAHN, in his capacity as +the EXECUTOR FOR THE ESTATE OF JEFFREY +E. EPSTEIN, and ADMINISTRATOR OF THE +1953 TRUST; ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, +THE 1953 TRUST, PLAN D, LLC; GREAT ST. +JIM, LLC; NAUTILUS, INC.; HYPERION AIR, +LLC; POPLAR, INC., SOUTHERN TRUST +COMPANY, INC.; JOHN AND JANE DOES + +JURY TRIAL DEMANDED + +DEFENDANTS, + +SUPERIOR COURT +OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS +FEB 11 2012 + +**FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT** + +**COMES NOW**, the Government of the United States Virgin Islands ("Government") and files this First Amended Complaint against the above-named Defendants and in support thereof, would show unto the Court as follows: + +**JURISDICTION AND PARTIES** + +1. The Attorney General of the United States Virgin Islands (herein after "Virgin Islands") brings this action on behalf of the Plaintiff, Government of the Virgin Islands, pursuant to 3 V.I.C. § 114 and her statutory authority to enforce the laws of the Virgin Islands, and advocate for the public interest, safety, health and well-being of persons in the Virgin Islands. + +GVI v. Estate of Jeffrey Epstein GVI's First Amended Complaint Page 2 of 55 + +2. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this civil matter pursuant to 4 V.I.C. § 76 and 14 V.I.C. § 607. + +3. This Court has personal jurisdiction over the parties pursuant to 5 V.I.C. § 4903. + +4. The Virgin Islands is an unincorporated territory of the United States. It consists of St. St. Croix, St. John, and Water Island, and more than 40 surrounding islands and Cays, some of which are privately owned. Among these privately owned islands are Little St. James and Great St. James. + +5. Jeffrey E. Epstein (-Epstein") was a resident of the Virgin Islands and he maintained a residence on Little St. James, which he acquired in 1998 and in 2016 he also purchased Great St. James. + +6. Epstein registered as a sex offender in the Virgin Islands in 2010. He was a Tier I offender under Virgin Islands law based upon his Florida conviction of procuring a minor for prostitution. As a Tier I offender, Epstein was required to register annually with the Virgin Islands Department of Justice ("VIDOJ") and give advance notice of his travel to and from the Virgin Islands. Epstein was also subject to random address verification by VIDOJ. + +7. Epstein was found dead on August 10, 2019 while in custody in New York for sex crimes. + +8. Defendant Darren K. Indyke ("Defendant Indyke") is co-executor of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein and Administrator of The 1953 Trust. + +9. Defendant Richard D. Kahn ("Defendant Kahn") is co-executor of The Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein and Administrator of The 1953 Trust. + +10. Defendant, the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein ("Estate"), created upon Epstein's death, is domiciled in the Virgin Islands. On August 15, 2019, Defendants Indyke and Kahn filed a Petition for Probate and Letters Testamentary which included Epstein's last will and testament with the Probate Division of the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands. + +II. The Petition reports the value of the real and personal property in The Estate located in the Virgin Islands at \$577,672,654.00 dollars. + +12. According to the Petition, the assets in the Virgin Islands thus far includes: + +- a. \$56.5 million in cash; +- b. \$127 million in fixed income and equity investments; +- c. \$195 million in hedge fund and private equity investments; and +- d. \$18.5 million in planes, boats, and automobiles. + +The Estate has not yet valued his fine arts, antiques, and other valuables. + +13. The Estate also includes shares of various corporate entities which hold residences and real property used by Epstein, namely: + +- a. Brownstone in New York City valued at \$56 million; +- b. Ranch in New Mexico valued at \$72 million; +- c. Gated home in Palm Beach, Florida, valued at \$12 million; +- d. Seven units in an apartment building in Paris, valued at \$8 million; and +- e. Great St. James and Little St. James, collectively valued at \$86 million. + +14. The Estate is responsible to pay damages for the acts committed by Epstein and the Epstein Enterprise described below. + +15. Defendant The 1953 Trust ("The Trust") was created by Epstein, who "amended and restated" its terms only two days before his suicide. That same day, Epstein revised his Last Will and Testament, transferring all of his "property, real and personal, wherever situated" to The Trust. + +16. The Trust also contains Epstein's financial assets and is also responsible to pay damages for the acts committed by Epstein and the Epstein Enterprise described below. Defendants Indyke and Kahn, filed a Certificate of Trust in the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands for The Trust on August 26, 2019. + +17. Epstein maintained a deliberately complex web of Virgin Islands corporations, limited liability companies, foundations, and other entities, not all of which are yet known to the Government of the Virgin Islands, through which he carried out and concealed his criminal conduct. + +18. Epstein regularly created new entities in the territory and transferred properties and funds between them in order to preserve and shield Epstein's assets and to facilitate and conceal the unlawful acts described in this Complaint. + +19. These entities held properties, including Little St. James and Great St. James, at which Epstein trafficked and sexually abused women and underage girls. Epstein owned and arranged for private planes, helicopters, boat and automobiles to transport victims to, from, and within the Virgin Islands, and provided money to pay these young women and underage girls. + +20. Epstein sat at the hub of this web, serving as president, member, manager, or director of each of the entities and, upon information and belief, directing their activities. + +21. Defendant, Nautilus, Inc., is a corporation established and organized under the laws of the Virgin Islands. It was incorporated on November 22, 2011. + +22. According to records of the Virgin Islands Recorder of Deeds, Nautilus, Inc. owns Little St. James, a/k/a Parcel Number 109803010100, a parcel of 3.1 million square feet valued at \$3.2 million, with buildings and improvements valued at \$4 million. + +23. Epstein was president and director of Nautilus, Inc., which corporate filings describe as - holding property for personal use." Defendants Indyke and Kahn are the secretary and treasurer of Nautilus, Inc., respectively. The Estate values Epstein's holdings of Nautilus, Inc., which holds title to Little St. James at \$63.9 million. + +24. A deed recorded with the Virgin Islands Recorder of Deeds on December 30, 2011 reflects that the property was transferred from a Delaware entity, L.S.J., LLC, to Nautilus, Inc. for "TEN DOLLARS (\$10.00) and other good and valuable consideration." The quitclaim deed lists Jeffrey Epstein as the sole member of L.S.J., LLC, which it acquired Little Saint James via a warranty deed dated April 27, 1998. + +25. As described below, Epstein engaged in a pattern and practice of trafficking and sexually abusing young women and female children on this private, secluded island of Little St. James where Epstein and his associates could avoid detection of their illegal activity from Virgin Islands and federal law enforcement and prevent these young women and underage girls from leaving freely and escaping the abuse. + +26. Thus, Nautilus, Inc. participated in carrying out, facilitating and concealing Epstein's crimes, hence Little St. James became an instrumentality of those crimes. + +27. Defendant, Great St. Jim, LLC, is a limited liability company established and organized under the laws of the Virgin Islands. Great St. Jim, LLC was organized on October 26, 2015. Great St. Jim, LLC, according to records of the Virgin Islands Recorder of Deeds, owns at least three properties that make up Great St. James acquired on January 28, 2016: Parcel Number 109801010100, consisting of 3.5 million square feet and valued at \$17.5 million; Parcel Number 109801010200, consisting of 450,000 square feet of land, valued at \$2.8 million; and Parcel Number 109801010300, 1.2 million square feet of land, valued at \$2.7 million. According to a + +GVI v. Estate of Jeffrey Epstein GVI's First Amended Complaint Page 6 of 55 + +warranty deed filed with the Virgin Islands Recorder of Deeds, Epstein, through Great St. Jim, LLC, acquired the last two parcels for \$5 million each. + +28. Epstein is listed as manager and a member of Great St. Jim, LLC and the nature of its business is described as "holding assets." + +29. Upon information and belief, Epstein purchased these Great St. James properties the island with closest proximity to Little St. James—to further shield his conduct on Little St. James from view, prevent his detection by law enforcement or the public, and allow him to continue and conceal his criminal enterprise. Epstein's significant investment in the purchase of Great St. James demonstrates his intent to expand his illegal operation in the Virgin Islands for years to come. Thus. Great St. Jim, LLC participated in carrying out, concealing, facilitating and continuing Epstein's crimes, and Great St. James became an instrumentality of those crimes. + +30. Defendant, Poplar, Inc., is a corporation established and organized under the laws of the Virgin Islands. Poplar, Inc. was incorporated on November 22, 201 I. Epstein was president and director of Poplar, Inc., and its purpose was described in corporate filings as "holding property for personal use." Defendants Indyke and Kahn are secretary and treasurer of Poplar, Inc., respectively. + +31. A certificate of incumbency provided to the Department of Planning and Natural Resources ("DPNR") also lists Epstein as president of Poplar, Inc. and expressly authorizes the incorporators to conduct "transactions related to permitting matters submitted on behalf of Great St. Jim, LLC." + +32. Poplar, Inc. is listed as the signatory for the 2017 Annual Report for Great St. Jim, LLC, and the signature appears to be Epstein's. The Petition for Probate and Letters Testamentary + +GVI v. Estate of Jeffrey Epstein GVI's First Amended Complaint Page 7 of 55 + +filed by The Estate lists Poplar, Inc. as holding title to Great St. James. Thus, Poplar, Inc. participated in carrying out, concealing, facilitating and continuing Epstein's crimes. + +33. Defendant, Plan D, LLC is a limited liability company established and organized under the laws of the Virgin Islands. In its original Articles of Organization, filed October 19, 2012, and Annual Report filings, Epstein's pilot, Larry Visoski. was listed as Plan D, LLC's sole manager/member. However, the July 31, 2019 Annual Report revealed Epstein as the principal behind Plan D, LLC. + +34. Upon information and belief, Plan D, LLC owns one or more of the airplanes and helicopters that Epstein used to transport young women and children to and from the Virgin Islands to carry out the criminal pattern of activity described below. Among the airplanes owned by Plan D, LLC is a Gulfstream with N-number N2 1 2JE. Flight logs and travel notices indicate that Epstein used this plane to traffic and transport and young women and underage girls to the Virgin Islands. + +35. Defendant, Hyperion Air, LLC is a limited liability company established and organized under the laws of the Virgin Islands on October 19, 2012. Jeffrey Epstein is a manager/member of Hyperion Air, LLC, along with his pilot, Larry Visoski. The purpose of Hyperion Air, LLC is listed in its Annual Report as - holding assets.' + +36. Hyperion Air, LLC is the registered owner of a Bell helicopter with N-number N331JE and a Keystone helicopter with N-number N722JE. Upon information and belief, Epstein used these helicopters to transport young women and underage girls between St. and Little St. James. + +37. Defendant Southern Trust Company, Inc. was originally incorporated in the Virgin Islands on November 18, 2011 as Financial Informatics, Inc., but changed its name to Southern GVI v. Estate of Jeffrey Epstein GVI's First Amended Complaint Page 8 of 55 + +Trust Company in September 2012. Southern Trust Company is atenant at American Yacht Harbor in Red Hook, St. 1.1 and Epstein is a"passive investor" in IGY-AYH, d/b/a American Yacht Harbor. By the end of 2013, according to its corporate filings, Southern Trust Company has assets of \$198.5 million; four years later, its assets reached \$391.3 million. From 2011 until at least 2018, Jeffrey Epstein was the President/Director of Southern Trust Company, and Defendants Kahn and lndyke were Treasurer/Director and Secretary/Director, respectively. Epstein was the sole owner of Southern Trust Company. + +38. John and Jane Does represent individuals and entities whose identities or involvement with Epstein are currently unknown. The Government of the Virgin Islands will amend the Complaint to add these individuals and entities when discovered. + +39. The Attorney General brings this action to seek all remedies available to the Government of the Virgin Islands in enforcing its laws and protecting the public interest and public safety. These claims are distinct from, and are not intended to supplant, the claims of victims who were unconscionably banned by Jeffrey Epstein and his associates. + +#### FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS + +# A. The Conduct of the "Epstein Enterprise" in the Virgin Islands + +40. Epstein and his associates, including Defendants, identified and recruited female victims, including children, and transported them to the Virgin Islands where they were abused and injured. Epstein, through and in association with Defendants, trafficked, raped, sexually assaulted and held captive underage girls and young women at his properties in the Virgin Islands. + +41. Epstein created anetwork of companies and individuals who participated in and conspired with him in a pattern of criminal activity related to the sex trafficking, forced labor, sexual assault, child abuse, and sexual servitude of these young women and children. Epstein and his associates trafficked underage girls to the Virgin Islands, held them captive, and sexually abused them, causing them grave physical, mental, and emotional injury. + +42. To accomplish his illegal ends, Epstein formed an association in fact with multiple Defendants and others (both companies and individuals) who were willing to participate in, facilitate, and conceal Epstein's criminal activity in exchange for Epstein's bestowal of financial and other benefits, including sexual services and forced labor from victims. + +43. This illicit association of Epstein, Defendants, and his associates constitute what is referred to herein as the "Epstein Enterprise." Epstein's associates in the Epstein Enterprise, including, but not limited to, those named as Defendants knowingly facilitated, participated in, and concealed Epstein's illegal conduct. + +44. Epstein used his wealth and power to create the Epstein Enterprise which engaged in a pattern of criminal activity in the Virgin Islands by repeatedly procuring and subjecting underage girls and young women to unlawful sexual conduct, sex trafficking, and forced labor. + +45. The Epstein Enterprise engaged in a pattern of criminal activity in the Virgin Islands (and elsewhere) with the criminal purpose and goal of placing a steady supply of vulnerable female children and young women into sexual servitude in service of Epstein's desires, and those of his associates. The Epstein Enterprise maintained and made available young women and underage girls for the purpose of engaging them in forced labor and sexual activities and used coercion and deception to procure, abuse, and harbor its victims. + +46. Flight logs and other sources establish that between 2001 and 2019 the Epstein Enterprise transported underage girls and young women to the Virgin Islands, who were then taken via helicopter or private vessel to Little St. James where they were then deceptively subjected to GVI v. Estate of Jeffrey Epstein GVI's First Amended Complaint Page 10 of 55 + +sexual servitude, forced to engage in sexual acts and coerced into commercial sexual activity and forced labor. + +47. In furtherance of its criminal activities, the Epstein Enterprise used its aircrafts to transport the young women and underage girls to the Virgin Islands for purposes of sexual abuse and exploitation. + +48. The Epstein Enterprise facilitated and participated in the sexual molestation and exploitation of numerous girls between the age of 12 and 17 years old. + +49. On the pretext of providing modeling opportunities, careers and contracts, associates of the Epstein Enterprise, funded by the Epstein Enterprise, lured and recruited young women and underage girls to travel to locations including the Virgin Islands where, upon information and belief, based on the pattern and practice of the Epstein Enterprise, they were sexually abused and exploited. + +50. Associates in the Epstein Enterprise recruited both victims and abusers into the Epstein Enterprise, participated in sexual acts of rape and abuse of minors and witnessed Epstein and others engage in sexual acts with children. + +51. As recent as 2018, air traffic controllers and other airport personnel reported seeing Epstein leave his plane with young girls some of whom appeared to be between the age of 11 and 18 years. + +52. Upon information and belief, based on Epstein's pattern of trafficking and sexually abusing young girls, the Epstein Enterprise trafficked and abused these girls, and others, in the Virgin Islands through 2018. + +53. When sued in civil court for committing sex trafficking and sex crimes, Epstein never denied engaging in sexual acts with underage females and procuring underage females for prostitution, but instead consistently invoked his Fifth Amendment privilege against selfincrimination. + +54. Upon information and belief, the Epstein Enterprise kept a computerized list of underage girls who were in or proximate to the Virgin Islands, and able to be transported to Epstein's residence at Little St. James in the Virgin Islands. + +55. The Epstein Enterprise engaged in a pattern of criminal conduct by trafficking children and young women and placing them in sexual servitude and forced labor in the Virgin Islands. The Epstein Enterprise repeatedly violated 14 V.I.C. §§ 133 to 138, which prohibit trafficking and sexual abuse. The Epstein Enterprise also repeatedly violated laws against child abuse and neglect, including 14 V.I.C. § 505, which defines the crime of child abuse as knowingly or recklessly causing "a child to suffer physical, mental, or emotional injury," or causing a child to be placed in a situation where such injury is foreseeable, and 14 V.I.C. § 506, which applies, as here, where the child suffers serious physical, mental, or emotional injury as a result of that abuse. The harm to Epstein's victims was both fully foreseeable and deeply damaging. + +56. The Epstein Enterprise knowingly recruited, transported, transferred, harbored, received, procured, obtained, isolated, maintained, and enticed young women and girls to engage in forced labor (such as providing massages) and, ultimately, sexual servitude at his little St. James residence. + +57. A 15 year old victim was forced into sexual acts with Epstein and others and then attempted to escape by swimming off the Little St. James island. Epstein and others organized a search party that located her and kept her captive by, among other things, confiscating her passport. + +58. Another victim, who was first engaged in provide massages to Epstein, was then forced to perform sexual acts at Little St. James in the Virgin Islands. When she attempted to + +escape from the "private island," Epstein and a search party found her, returned her to his house, and suggested physical restraint or hann if she failed to cooperate. + +59. The Epstein Enterprise deceptively lured underage girls and women into its sex trafficking ring with money and promises of employment, career opportunities and school assistance. The Epstein Enterprise preyed on their financial and other vulnerabilities, and promised victims money, shelter, gifts, employment, tuition and other items of value. For example, participants in the Epstein Enterprise targeted young and underage females under the pretext that they would be paid substantially merely to provide massages to him and others. However, once drawn in, victims were then pressured and coerced to engage in sexual acts. + +60. The Epstein Enterprise forced underage victims to recruit others to perform services and engage in sexual acts—a trafficking pyramid scheme. + +61. The Epstein Enterprise paid girls for each "meeting." with additional money if they brought additional girls. Epstein reportedly required three meetings per day. + +62. The Epstein Enterprise used the term "work" as a code for sexual abuse, and, upon information and belief, reportedly kept computer records of the contact information for the victims. + +63. Consistent with his creation and use of acomplex web of entities to carry out and conceal the criminal trafficking enterprise in the Virgin islands, the Epstein Enterprise sometimes paid young women and underage girls he exploited and trafficked through his charitable foundations. + +64. Once the girls and women were recruited, participants in the Epstein Enterprise enforced their sexual servitude of victims by coercion, including but not limited to, confiscating passports, controlling and extinguishing external communications, and threatening violence. They + +also made fraudulent statements to family members of victims, claiming victims were being well cared for and supported financially in college and other educational opportunities. + +65. The Epstein Enterprise transported, held, sexually abused, trafficked, and concealed women and children at his property in the Virgin Islands dozens of times over nearly two decades. + +#### B. The "Epstein Enterprise" Abused Privileges of Residency to Carry out its Criminal Scheme + +66. The Epstein Enterprise in 1998 acquired Little St. James in the Virgin Islands as the perfect hideaway and haven for trafficking young women and underage girls for sexual servitude, child abuse and sexual assault. Little St. James is a secluded, private island, nearly two miles from St. with no other residents. It can be visited only by private boat or helicopter; no public or commercial transportation is available to carry persons on or off the island, and no bridge connects the island to St. Epstein had easy access to Little St. James from the private airfield on St. , only 10 minutes away by his private helicopter, but the women and children he trafficked, abused, and held there were not able to leave without his permission and assistance, as it was too far and dangerous to swim to St. + +67. In 2016, upon information and belief, using a straw purchaser to hide Epstein's identity, the Epstein Enterprise acquired Great St. James the nearest island to Little St. James. By then, Epstein was a convicted sex offender. Upon information and belief, the Epstein Enterprise purchased the island for more than \$20 million because its participants wanted to ensure that the island did not become a base from which others could view their activities or visitors. By acquiring ownership and control of Great St. James to the exclusion of others, the Epstein Enterprise created + +additional barriers to prevent those held involuntarily on Little St. James from escaping or obtaining help from others. + +68. Great St. James and Little St. James are environmentally sensitive locations, with native coral and wildlife protected by federal and territorial law and enforcement authorities. The Department of Planning and Natural Resources ("DPNR") regulates and monitors construction in the Coastal Zone to protect, maintain and manage the precious natural resources of the Virgin Islands. Under its authority, DPNR repeatedly issued citations and assessed thousands of dollars of fines for violations of the Virgin Islands construction code and environmental protection laws on both Little St. James and Great St. James—significant penalties to the agency and to the average resident of the Virgin Islands. But because of Epstein's enormous wealth, these fines had little effect in curbing or stopping the Epstein Enterprise's unlawful conduct or conforming its activities to the law. + +69. As a result of illegal construction activity of the Epstein Enterprise, the Virgin Islands has incurred, and will incur, significant expenses to remove the illegal construction or remediate its effects on natural resources in and around Little St. James and Great St. James. The extent of the potential environmental damage is unknown at this time as the illegal construction has not been removed or remediated. + +70. The Epstein Enterprise continues to attempt to prevent or limit DPNR authorities from conducting random inspections on the Little St. James and Great St. James necessary to comply with Virgin Islands law. + +71. The Epstein Enterprise's violation of the construction and environmental laws was part of a pattern of behavior in flouting the laws of the Virgin Islands and holding itself above the law. Upon information and belief, as described above, the Epstein Enterprise undertook + +construction at Great St. James after 2016 to continue the scheme to carry out and conceal his trafficking and sexual abuse of young women and children in the Virgin Islands. These actions are also indicative of the Epstein Enterprise's disregard for Virgin Islands' law. The Epstein Enterprise used the Virgin Islands' land, resources, people, and laws for its illicit purposes. Rather than participating lawfully in this community, the Epstein Enterprise took advantage of the secluded nature of the islands in furtherance of its crimes. + +72. As a result of its deplorable and unlawful conduct, the Epstein Enterprise has subjected the Virgin Islands to public portrayals as a hiding place for human trafficking and sex crimes. + +# C. The "Epstein Enterprise" Fraudulently Concealed its Conduct + +73. The Epstein Enterprise fraudulently concealed its actions to prevent detection by the Government of the Virgin Islands. + +74. The secluded properties at Little St. James and Great St. James were repeatedly used by the Epstein Enterprise as the locations for unlawfully soliciting, transporting, transferring, harboring, receiving, providing, isolating, patronizing, maintaining, deceiving, coercing, and sexually abusing young women and children and concealing these crimes. + +75. The Epstein Enterprise was able to hide the trafficking ring from law enforcement, despite the fact that Epstein was a registered sex offender. Given the isolation of the Little St. James and Great St. James and the nature of the crimes and of the victims targeted by the Epstein Enterprise, the activities of the Epstein Enterprise were not readily detectable. Moreover, Epstein's great wealth and power likely made witnesses reluctant to report their observations to the local law enforcement. + +GVI v. Estate of Jeffrey Epstein GVI's First Amended Complaint Page 16 of 55 + +76. Upon information and belief, the Epstein Enterprise prevented its employees from cooperating with law enforcement. Employees and others were required to sign confidentiality agreements that prohibited them from speaking to or sharing information with law enforcement. If they were contacted by law enforcement they were to notify the Epstein Enterprise and be represented by Epstein's counsel. + +77. The employees were directed not to communicate or interact with guests visiting Little St. James and were also directed not to disclose to anyone events that occurred on the island. + +78. Monitoring a sex offender with his own private islands and the resources to fly victims in and out on private planes and helicopters presented unique challenges and allowed the Epstein Enterprise to limit scrutiny by the Government of the Virgin Islands. + +79. Sexual Offender Registration and Community Protection Act ("SORCPA") 14 V.I.C. § 1721, et. seq. requires sex offenders to register in their resident jurisdictions and to make periodic in-person appearances to verify and update their registration information. + +80. Epstein renewed his registration each year in the Virgin Islands. In addition, beyond this statutory requirement, the Virgin Islands periodically visited—or attempted to visit— Little St. James to conduct additional address verifications. + +81. At his last verification in July 2018, Epstein refused to permit Virgin Islands Department of Justice Investigators, assisted by United States Marshals, to enter Little St. James beyond its dock, claiming that the dock was his "front door." Instead, Epstein arranged to be met at his office on St. MN + +82. Epstein also misled the Government regarding his travel plans. On March 19, 2019, the Virgin Islands was notified that Epstein would be traveling to France for 10 days on the private plane owned by Plan D, LLC. His notification form did not disclose travel to any other countries. + +It was later found by law enforcement authorities that Epstein also travelled to Vienna and Monaco during that trip. + +83. Similarly, the Epstein Enterprise sought to prevent DPNR from conducting routine site visits to inspect unpermitted and potentially damaging construction activity on Great St. James. The Epstein Enterprise repeatedly objected to DPNR's inspections referring to them as "invasionsof Epstein's constitutional right to privacy in his home, which he described defined as the entire island. These DPNR inspections are required for all construction and Virgin Islands residents are required to cooperate with the inspections to assure compliance with the law throughout the construction phases. + +84. These efforts represent Epstein Enterprise's intent to conceal its unlawful activity on Little St. James and Great St. James. + +85. The Epstein Enterprise also created numerous corporations and limited liability companies in the Virgin Islands to help conceal its unlawful activity. Most of these companies were created in 2011 and 2012, soon after Epstein registered as a sex offender in the Virgin Islands. + +86. Epstein's pilot, Larry Visoski is identified as member or co-member in companies that serviced and maintained the planes that the Epstein Enterprise used to traffick young women and children — Freedom Air Petroleum, LLC (registered November 28, 2011 to hold assets); and JEGE, LLC (registered October 19, 2012 to hold assets). + +87. Other Epstein entities include LSJ Employees, LLC (registered October 27, 2011 to provide services); Southern Financial, LLC (registered February 25, 2013 to provide services) and LSJ Emergency, LLC (registered December 2, 2015 to provide services). + +88. Some of these companies held considerable assets: Financial Informatics, Inc. (incorporated November 18, 2011, also known as Southern Trust Company, Inc.) had assets of GVI v. Estate of Jeffrey Epstein GVI's First Amended Complaint Page 18 of 55 + +approximately \$391 million in 2015; and Financial Trust Company, Inc. (incorporated November 6, 1998) had assets of \$212 million when it publicly filed its last balance sheet in 2012. + +89. Though often absent in the original incorporation or registration documents or annual filings, Epstein ultimately appeared as president, director, manager, or sole member of each of these companies. Upon information and belief, the purpose of this complex array of corporate entities—some of which may still be discovered—was to allow Epstein to shelter his assets in order to fund, carry out, and conceal his identity and pattern of criminal conduct. + +90. The Estate continues to engage in acourse of conduct aimed at concealing the criminal activities of the Epstein Enterprise. On November 24, 2019, Epstein's Estate filed an Expedited Motion for Establishment of aVoluntary Claims Resolution Program in the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands. ("Motion"). According to the Motion, the proposed program was to be designed to "establish an independent and voluntary claims resolution program for purposes of resolving sexual abuse claims against Jeffrey E. Epstein." (Motion, at 1). + +91. The program proposed by the Estate, whose executors are trustees of The 1953 Trust and officers in at least two Epstein entities, imposes confidentiality requirements and requires any claimant accepting an award under the program to sacrifice any other claims against "any person or entity arising from or related to Mr. Epstein's conduct." (Motion, at 5). It acts to conceal the criminal activities of the Epstein Enterprise and shield its participants from liability and accountability for the injury they caused to the victims. + +92. Two days before his death, Epstein amended The Trust and his Last Will and Testament. Upon information and belief, he did so, as part of apattern and ongoing effort to conceal and shield his assets from potential recovery by claimants. + +#### D. The "Epstein Enterprise" Violated Numerous Virgin Islands Laws + +93. The pattern of criminal activity engaged in by Epstein and other participants in the Epstein Enterprise violated 14 V.1.C. §§ 605 and 607 of the Criminally Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act ("CICO"). + +94. The Epstein Enterprise also violated Title 14, Chapter 3A, The Virgin Islands Uniform Prevention of and Remedies for Human Trafficking Act relating to Trafficking of Persons; Title 14, Chapter 24, relating to Child Protection and Child Abuse and Neglect; Title 14, Chapter 81, relating to Prostitution and Related Offenses; Title IS, Chapter 85, relating to Rape and Sexual Assault and other related offenses, as well as other Virgin Islands laws. + +95. The Epstein Enterprise violated Virgin Islands laws by engaging in the human trafficking of underage girls and young women and commercial sex with young women and underage girls by force, fraud, enticement, or coercion, which serve as predicates to the Epstein Enterprise's violations of CICO. + +96. Certain participants who recruited women and underage girls to be trafficked and forced into sexual servitude themselves were sexually trafficked and abused by the Epstein Enterprise and may be afforded the protections of 14 V.I.C. § 145. + +97. Specifically, Plan D, LLC knowingly and intentionally facilitated the trafficking scheme by flying underage girls and young women into the Virgin Islands to be delivered into sexual servitude. Plan D LLC repeatedly made flights from the mainland to St. with Epstein and underage girls and young women for the purpose of engaging in sexual activity on Little St. James. On some occasions, they would transport Epstein and female children by + +GVI v. Estate of Jeffrey Epstein GVI's First Amended Complaint Page 20 of 55 + +helicopter to Little St. James. On other occasions, Epstein and the young women and girls would be transported by boat. + +98. Great St. Jim, LLC and Nautilus, Inc. knowingly participated in the Epstein Enterprise and facilitated the trafficking and sexual servitude of young women and underage girls by providing the secluded properties at, from, or to which Epstein and his associates were able to transport, transfer, receive, maintain, isolate, harbor, provide, entice, deceive, coerce, and sexually abuse underage girls and young women. + +99. The Epstein Enterprise engaged in acontinuing course of unlawful conduct. + +100. After Epstein's suicide, the Epstein Enterprise continued to exist as each of the participants continued to conspire to prevent detection of the breadth and scope of the Epstein Enterprise's criminal wrongdoing and to prevent accountability. These conspiratorial acts are ongoing. + +101. The conduct of the Epstein Enterprise offends the core purpose of the Virgin Islands Uniform Prevention of and Remedies for Human Trafficking Act, 14 V.I.C. §131 et seq, and violates CICO, enacted to "curtail criminal activity and lessen its economic and political power in the Territory of the Virgin Islands by establishing new penal prohibitions and providing to law enforcement and the victims of criminal activity new civil sanctions and remedies." 14 V.I.C. § 601. + +102. The Epstein Enterprise is an illicit enterprise within the meaning of 14 V.I.C. §§ 604 and 605. + +103. The Government is entitled to recover civil penalties, damages and other remedies and to extinguish and recoup from the Epstein Enterprise any and all financial and other benefits, and any personal and real property that was used during the course of, or intended for use in the + +course of the conduct or criminal activity in violation of the laws of the Virgin Islands. The Government is entitled to obtain through divestiture, forfeiture, or other equitable relief all properties and instrumentalities used by the Epstein Enterprise in the criminal pattern of trafficking and sexual abuse in the Virgin Islands, including but not limited to Great St. James and Little St. James, and all other remedies and penalties permitted by law in the interest of justice. + +#### E. The Epstein Enterprise Used Corporate Entities to Defraud the Government and Fund its Criminal Activities + +104. In October 2012, the Southern Trust Company applied for economic benefits from the Economic Development Commission ("EDC"). The EDC is a subsidiary of the Virgin Islands Economic Development Authority ("EDA"), a semi-autonomous governmental instrumentality created and governed pursuant to 29 VIC § 1101. + +105. In sworn testimony at a public hearing on the tax incentive application conducted by the EDC on November 15, 2012, Epstein and his attorney, Ericka Kellerhals, described Southern Trust Company as providing "cutting edge consulting services" in the area of "biomedical and financial informatics.- + +106. The EDC granted Southern Trust Company a 10-year package of economic incentives running from February 1, 2013 until January 31, 2023 that included a 90% exemption from income taxes and 100% exemptions from gross receipts, excise, and withholding taxes in the Virgin Islands. + +107. Between 2013 and 2019, Southern Trust Company employed 13 different individuals (not including Epstein). Of those 13 individuals, 11 served in administrative or support roles: six as personal, administrative, or executive assistants, receptionists, or as a driver/helper, one as an office manager, one as a clerk, and three in accounting or payroll functions (though only GVI v. Estate ofJeffrey Epstein GVI' s First Amended Complaint Page 22 of 55 + +one was licensed as acertified public accountant). There was one network administrator/IT manager, and a second who was added in 2019. + +108. In fact, several of those individuals seemed to perform other personal services for Jeffrey Epstein. Though he was reported by Southern Trust Company to be resident of the Virgin Islands, the network administrator/IT manager was issued aFlorida driver's license, which listed an address in Miami. Further, he appears, in fact, to have served as Epstein's driver and picked up luggage and cargo from Epstein's private planes on his behalf. + +109. Another executive assistant lived at 301 E. 66th Street, Apartment 11B, New York, New York. Epstein's address book lists units various units in this building as providing "Apt. for models" and she is publicly identified as amodel. As noted above, the Epstein Enterprise used modeling opportunities and contracts as a pretext for recruiting underage girls and young women into its sex trafficking scheme. + +110. During several time periods, Southern Trust Company affirmed to EDC that it had no employees who were non-residents, even though it employed non-residents. + +III. Despite having only one full-time employee working on information technology during the bulk of the period, Southern Trust Company reportedly generated net income of \$50.3 million in 2013, \$67.5 million in 2014, \$52.8 million in 2015, and \$4.8 million in 2016 and \$17.1 million in 2017, with aggregate income of \$117.8 million in 2014, \$170.6 million in 2015, \$175.3 million in 2016 and \$192.4 million in 2017, or aggregate income for the period of \$656 million. + +112. For the period between January I, 2013 and December 31, 2017, Southern Trust Company received tax exemptions totaling \$73.6 million. + +113. As of December 31, 2017, Southern Trust Company, Inc. elected to file its income tax as an S-corporation, which elects to pass corporate income, losses, deductions and credits + +GVI v. Estate of Jeffrey Epstein GVI's First Amended Complaint Page 23 of 55 + +through to its sole shareholder—Jeffrey Epstein—for tax purposes. For this time period, Epstein's income tax exemption was \$71.3 million. + +114. Based upon these facts, it is clear that Southern Trust Company did not perform the "informatics" business represented to the EDC and could not have generated the business income attributable to that business. Instead, upon information and belief, Southern Trust Company existed to secure tax benefits for Epstein, to employ individuals associated with the Epstein Enterprise, and to provide a source of income to support his criminal activities and properties in the Virgin Islands. + +#### COUNT ONE Human Trafficking — Trafficking an Individual Violation of the Criminally Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act ("CICO"), 14 V.I.C. § 600 et seq.; and 14 V.I.0 §133 + +115. The Government restates and realleges paragraphs 1 to 115 of this Complaint as if fully set forth herein. + +116. At all times material herein, each Defendant directly and indirectly participated in or associated with the Epstein Enterprise, an illicit enterprise. + +117. The Epstein Enterprise engaged in two or more occasions of conduct that constitute criminal predicate acts as defined by CICO, including, but not limited to, knowingly recruiting, transporting, transferring, harboring, receiving, providing, obtaining, isolating, maintaining, or enticing female children and young women in the furtherance and performance of forced labor, sexual servitude and commercial sexual activity in violation of Virgin Islands laws codified in 14 V.I.C. §§ 133-138. + +GVI v. Estate of Jeffrey Epstein GVI's First Amended Complaint Page 24 of 55 + +118. Defendants through a pattern of criminal activity acquired and maintained, directly or indirectly, an interest in or control of the Epstein Enterprise or real property. + +119. Defendants benefited, directly and indirectly, from the pattern of criminal activity conducted by the Epstein Enterprise. + +120. At all times material herein, Defendants engaged in said pattern of criminal activity that was not isolated but was related to the affairs of the Epstein Enterprise in violation of CICO. 14 V.I.C. §600 et seq. + +#### COUNT TWO Human Trafficking — Trafficking an Individual Conspiracy to Violate the Criminally Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act 14 V.I.C. § 600 et seq. and 14 V.I.0 §133 + +121. The Government restates and realleges paragraphs 1-120 of this Complaint as if fully set forth herein. + +122. At all times material herein, each Defendant joined in a conspiracy to violate laws prohibiting human trafficking. + +123. Each Defendant engaged in acts that revealed its intent to join and participate in the criminal conspiracy by recruiting, transporting, transferring, harboring, receiving, providing, obtaining, isolating, maintaining or enticing female children and young women in the furtherance and performance of forced labor, sexual servitude and commercial sexual activity in violation of Virgin Islands laws codified in 14 V.I.C. § 133 -138. + +124. Defendants knowingly benefited financially and/or obtained other non-financial value from participation in the Epstein Enterprise, which has engaged in human trafficking, forced labor, sexual servitude and commercial sexual activity of girls and young women in knowing or reckless disregard of the laws of the Virgin Islands. + +125. At all times material herein, each Defendant conspired with Epstein and other Defendants to fulfill the primary criminal purposes of the Epstein Enterprise: human trafficking, forced labor, and sexual servitude. 14 V.I.C. §604(j). + +126. At all times material herein, Defendants engaged in said pattern of criminal activity that was not isolated but was related to the affairs of the Epstein Enterprise in violation of CICO. 14 V.I.C. §600 et seq. + +#### COUNT THREE Human Trafficking — Forced Labor Violation of the Criminally Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act ("CICO"), 14 V.I.C. § 600 et seq.; and 14 V.I.0 §134 + +127. The Government restates and realleges paragraphs 1-126 of this Complaint as if fully set forth herein. + +128. At all times material herein, each Defendant directly and indirectly participated in or associated with the Epstein Enterprise, an illicit enterprise. + +129. The Epstein Enterprise engaged in two or more occasions of conduct that constitute criminal predicate acts as defined by CICO, including, but not limited to, knowingly using coercion to compel underage girls and young women to provide labor or services by forced labor in violation of 14 V.I.C. § 134. + +GVI v. Estate of Jeffrey Epstein GV1's First Amended Complaint Page 26 of 55 + +130. The Epstein Enterprise knowingly provided or obtained the labor services of individuals by means of force, threats of force, physical restraint, and/or threats of physical restraint; by means of serious harm or threats of serious harm; by means of abuse or threatened abuse of law or legal processes; and by means of the Epstein Enterprise with the intent to cause individuals to believe that, if individuals did not perform such labor or services, individuals would suffer serious harm or physical restraint. + +131. Defendants through a pattern of criminal activity directly and indirectly participated in or associated with the Epstein Enterprise, an illicit enterprise. + +132. Defendants through a pattern of criminal activity acquired and maintained, directly or indirectly, an interest in or control of the Epstein Enterprise or real property. + +133. Defendants benefited, directly and indirectly, from the pattern of criminal activity conducted by the Epstcin Enterprise. + +134. At all times material herein, Defendants engaged in said pattern of criminal activity that was not isolated but was related to the affairs of the Epstein Enterprise in violation of CICO. 14 V.1.C. §600 et seq. + +#### COUNT FOUR Human Trafficking — Forced Labor Conspiracy to Violate the Criminally Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 14 V.I.C. § 600 et seq.; and 14 V.I.0 §134 + +135. The Government restates and realleges paragraphs 1-134 of this Complaint as if fully set forth herein. prohibiting human trafficking. + +136. At all times material herein, each Defendant joined in aconspiracy to violate laws + +137. Each Defendant engaged in acts that revealed its intent to join and participate in the criminal conspiracy by knowingly using coercion to compel underage girls and young women to provide labor or services by forced labor in violation of 14 V.I.C. § 134. + +138. Defendants knowingly benefited financially and/or obtained other non-financial value from participation in the Epstein Enterprise, which has engaged in human trafficking, forced labor, sexual servitude and commercial sexual activity of girls and young women in knowing or reckless disregard of the laws of the Virgin Islands. + +139. At all times material herein, each Defendant conspired with Epstein and other Defendants to fulfill the primary criminal purposes of the Epstein Enterprise: human trafficking, forced labor, and sexual servitude. 14 V.I.C. §604(j). + +140. At all times material herein, Defendants engaged in said pattern of criminal activity that was not isolated but was related to the affairs of the Epstein Enterprise in violation of CICO. 14 V.I.C. §600 et seq. + +#### COUNT FIVE Human Trafficking — Sexual Servitude Violation of the Criminally Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act ("CICO"), 14 V.I.C. § 600 et seq.; 14 V.I.0 §135 + +141. The Government restates and realleges paragraphs 1-140 of this Complaint as if fully set forth herein. + +142. At all times material herein, each Defendant directly and indirectly participated in or associated with the Epstein Enterprise, an illicit enterprise. + +143. The Epstein Enterprise engaged in two or more occasions of conduct that constitute criminal predicate acts as defined by CICO, including, but not limited to, knowingly maintaining or making available minors for the purpose of engaging the minors in commercial sexual activities GVI v. Estate of Jeffrey Epstein GVI's First Amended Complaint Page 28 of 55 + +or using coercion or deception to force young women to engage in commercial sexual activity in violation of 14 V.I.C. § 135. + +144. On the pretext of providing modeling opportunities, careers and contracts, Defendants facilitated the transporting or recruiting of young women and girls or lured and recruited young women and underage girls to travel to the Virgin Islands where they engaged in sexual acts with Epstein and others. In some instances, young women and underage girls were given scholarships, money, gifts or other items of value in exchange for engaging in sexual acts with Epstein and others. + +145. Defendants through a pattern of criminal activity directly and indirectly participated in or associated with the Epstein Enterprise, an illicit enterprise. + +146. Defendants through a pattern of criminal activity acquired and maintained, directly or indirectly, an interest in or control of the Epstein Enterprise or real property. + +147. Defendants benefited, directly and indirectly, from the pattern of criminal activity conducted by the Epstein Enterprise. + +148. At all times material herein, Defendants engaged in said pattern of criminal activity that was not isolated but was related to the affairs of the Epstein Enterprise in violation of CIC0. 14 V.I.C. §600 et seq. + +#### COUNT SIX Human Trafficking — Sexual Servitude Conspiracy to Violate the Criminally Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act 14 V.I.C. § 600 et seq.; 14 V.I.0 §135 + +149. The Government restates and realleges paragraphs 1-148 of this Complaint as if fully set forth herein. + +150. At all times material herein, each Defendant joined in a conspiracy to violate laws prohibiting human trafficking. + +151. Each Defendant engaged in acts that revealed its intent to join the criminal conspiracy by knowingly maintaining or making available minors for the purpose of engaging the minors in commercial sexual activities or using coercion or deception to force young women to engage in commercial sexual activity in violation of 14 V.I.C. § 135. + +152. On the pretext of providing modeling opportunities, careers and contracts, Defendants facilitated the transporting or recruiting of young women and girls or lured and recruited young women and underage girls to travel to the Virgin Islands where they engaged in sexual acts with Epstein and others. In some instances, young women and underage girls were given scholarships, money, gifts or other items of value in exchange for engaging in sexual acts with Epstein and others. + +153. Defendants knowingly benefited financially and/or obtained other non-financial value from participation in the Epstein Enterprise, which has engaged in human trafficking, forced labor, sexual servitude and commercial sexual activity of girls and young women in knowing or reckless disregard of the laws of the Virgin Islands. + +154. At all times material herein, each Defendant conspired with Epstein and other Defendants to fulfill the primary criminal purposes of the Epstein Enterprise: human trafficking, forced labor, and sexual servitude. 14 V.I.C. §604(j). + +155. At all times material herein, Defendants engaged in said pattern of criminal activity that was not isolated but was related to the affairs of the Epstein Enterprise in violation of CICO. 14 V.I.C. §600 et seq. + +GVI v. Estate of Jeffrey Epstein GVI's First Amended Complaint Page 30 of 55 + +#### COUNT SEVEN Human Trafficking — Patronizing Minors and Victims of Sexual Servitude Violation of the Criminally Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act ("CICO"), 14V.I.C. § 600 et seq.; 14 V.I.0 §§ 136-37 + +156. The Government restates and realleges paragraphs 1-155 of this Complaint as if fully set forth herein. + +157. At all times material herein, each Defendant directly and indirectly participated in or associated with the Epstein Enterprise, an illicit enterprise. + +158. The Epstein Enterprise engaged in two or more occasions of conduct that constitute criminal predicate acts as defined by CICO, including, but not limited to, knowingly giving, agreeing to give, or offering to give items of value to young women and minors so that the young women and minors would engage in commercial sexual activity with Epstein, other Defendants, and other individuals in violation of 14 V.I.C. §\* 136-137. + +159. In some instances, young women and underage girls were given scholarships, money, gifts or other items of value in exchange for engaging in sexual acts with Epstein and others. + +160. Defendants through a pattern of criminal activity directly and indirectly participated in or associated with the Epstein Enterprise, an illicit enterprise. + +161. Defendants through a pattern of criminal activity acquired and maintained, directly or indirectly, an interest in or control of the Epstein Enterprise or real property. + +162. Defendants benefited, directly and indirectly, from the pattern of criminal activity conducted by the Epstein Enterprise. + +GVI v. Estate of Jeffrey Epstein GVI's First Amended Complaint Page 31 of 55 + +163. At all times material herein, Defendants engaged in said pattern of criminal activity that was not isolated but was related to the affairs of the Epstein Enterprise in violation of CICO 14 V.I.C. §600 el seq. + +#### COUNT EIGHT Human Trafficking — Patronizing Minors and Victims of Sexual Servitude Conspiracy to Violate the Criminally Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act 14 V.I.C. § 600 et seq.; 14 V.I.0 §§ 136-37 + +164. The Government restates and realleges paragraphs 1-163 of this Complaint as if fully set forth herein. + +165. At all times material herein, each Defendant joined in a conspiracy to violate laws prohibiting human trafficking. + +166. Each Defendant engaged in acts that revealed its intent to join and participate in the criminal conspiracy by knowingly giving, agreeing to give, or offering to give items of value to young women and minors so that the young women and minors would engage in commercial sexual activity with Epstein, other Defendants, and other individuals in violation of 14 V.I.C. §§ 136-137. + +167. In some instances, young women and underage girls were given scholarships, money, gifts or other items of value in exchange for engaging in sexual acts with Epstein and others. + +168. Defendants knowingly benefited financially and/or obtained other non-financial value from participation in the Epstein Enterprise, which has engaged in human trafficking, forced labor, sexual servitude and commercial sexual activity of girls and young women in knowing or reckless disregard of the laws of the Virgin Islands. + +GVI v. Estate of Jeffrey Epstein GVI's First Amended Complaint Page 32 of 55 + +169. At all times material herein, each Defendant conspired with Epstein and other Defendants to fulfill the primary criminal purposes of the Epstein Enterprise: human trafficking, forced labor, and sexual servitude. + +170. At all times material herein, Defendants engaged in said pattern of criminal activity that was not isolated but was related to the affairs of the Epstein Enterprise in violation of CICO 14 V.I.C. §600 el seq. + +#### COUNT NINE Child Abuse and Neglect Violation of the Criminally Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act ("CICO"), 14 V.I.C. § 600 et seq.; 14 V.I.0 §§ 505, 506 and 507 + +171. The Government restates and realleges paragraphs 1-170 of this Complaint as if as if fully set forth herein. + +172. At all times material herein, each Defendant directly and indirectly participated in or associated with the Epstein Enterprise, an illicit enterprise. + +173. The Epstein Enterprise engaged in two or more occasions of conduct that constitute criminal predicate acts as defined by CICO, including, but not limited to, knowingly or recklessly causing a child to suffer physical, mental or emotional injury, or knowingly or recklessly causing a child to be placed in a situation where it is reasonably foreseeable that such child may suffer physical, mental or emotional injury, in violation Virgin Islands criminal laws prohibiting Child Abuse and Neglect in Title 14 V.I.C. § 500 et. seq. + +174. As a result of the Epstein Enterprise's actions numerous young girls suffered serious physical, mental and emotional injury. + +175. Defendants through a pattern of criminal activity acquired and maintained, directly or indirectly, an interest in or control of the Epstein Enterprise or real property. + +GV1 v. Estate of Jeffrey Epstein GVI's First Amended Complaint Page 33 of 55 + +176. Defendants benefited, directly and indirectly, from the pattern of criminal activity conducted by the Epstein Enterprise. + +177. At all times material herein, Defendants engaged in a pattern of criminal activity that was not isolated but was related to the affairs of the Epstein Enterprise in violation of CICO. 14 V.I.C. §600 et seq. + +#### COUNT TEN Child Abuse and Neglect Conspiracy to Violate the Criminally Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 14 V.I.C. § 600 et seq.; 14 V.I.0 §§ 505, 506 and 507 + +178. The Government restates and realleges paragraphs 1-177 of this Complaint as if as if fully set forth herein. + +179. At all times material herein, each Defendant joined in a conspiracy to violate laws prohibiting child abuse and neglect. + +180. Each Defendant engaged in acts that revealed its intent to join and participate in the criminal conspiracy as they knowingly or recklessly caused a child to suffer physical, mental or emotional injury, or knowingly or recklessly caused a child to be placed in a situation where it is reasonably foreseeable that such child may suffer physical, mental or emotional injury, in violation Virgin Islands criminal laws prohibiting Child Abuse and Neglect in Title 14 V.I.C. § 500 et seq. + +181. As a result of Defendants' actions, numerous young girls suffered serious physical, mental and emotional injury. + +182. Defendants knowingly benefited financially and/or obtained other non-financial value from participation in the Epstein Enterprise, which has engaged in human trafficking, forced labor, sexual servitude and commercial sexual activity of girls and young women in knowing or reckless disregard of the laws of the Virgin Islands. + +GVI v. Estate of Jeffrey Epstein GVI's First Amended Complaint Page 34 of 55 + +183. At all times material herein, each Defendant conspired with Epstein and other Defendants to fulfill the primary criminal purposes of the Epstein Enterprise: human trafficking, forced labor, and sexual servitude. 14 V.I.C. §604(j). + +184. At all times material herein, Defendants engaged in apattern of criminal activity that was not isolated but was related to the affairs of the Epstein Enterprise in violation of CICO. 14V.I.C. §600 et seq. + +#### COUNT ELEVEN Aggravated Rape Violation of the Criminally Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act ("CICO"), 14V.I.C. § 600 et seq.; 14 V.I.0 § 1700a + +185. The Government restates and II:alleges paragraphs 1-184 of this Complaint as if fully set forth herein. + +186. At all times material herein, each Defendant directly and indirectly participated in or associated with the Epstein Enterprise, an illicit enterprise. + +187. The Epstein Enterprise engaged in two or more occasions of conduct that constitute criminal predicate acts as defined by CICO, including, but not limited to, conduct that constituted or facilitated the rape of minors by force, intimidation, or the perpetrator's position of authority over the victim. + +188. Epstein and others, using force or intimidation, engaged in sexual intercourse with underage girls without their consent in violation of 14 V.I.C. § I 700a. + +189. As a result of the Epstein Enterprise's actions, numerous underage girls suffered serious physical, mental and emotional injury. + +190. Defendants through a pattern of criminal activity acquired and maintained, directly or indirectly, an interest in or control of the Epstein Enterprise or real property. + +GV1 v. Estate of Jeffrey Epstein GVFs First Amended Complaint Page 35 of 55 + +191. Defendants benefited, directly and indirectly, from the pattern of criminal activity conducted by the Epstein Enterprise. + +192. At all times material herein, Defendants engaged in a pattern of criminal activity that was not isolated but was related to the affairs of the Epstein Enterprise in violation of CICO. 14 V.I.C. §600 et seq. + +#### COUNT TWELVE Aggravated Rape Conspiracy to Violate the Criminally Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 14 V.I.C. § 600 et seq.; 14 V.I.0 § 1700a + +193. The Government restates and realleges paragraphs 1-192 of this Complaint as if fully set forth herein. + +194. At all times material herein, each Defendant joined in a conspiracy to violate laws prohibiting aggravated rape. + +195. Each Defendant engaged in acts that revealed its intent to join and participate in the criminal conspiracy by engaging in conduct that constituted or facilitated the rape of minors by force, intimidation, or the perpetrator's position of authority over the victim. + +196. Epstein and others, using force or intimidation, engaged in sexual intercourse with underage girls without their consent in violation of 14 V.I.C. § 1700a. + +197. As a result of Defendants' actions, numerous underage girls suffered serious physical, mental and emotional injury. + +198. Defendants knowingly benefited financially and/or obtained other non-financial value from participation in the Epstein Enterprise, which has engaged in human trafficking, forced labor, sexual servitude and commercial sexual activity of girls and young women in knowing or reckless disregard of the laws of the Virgin Islands. + +GVI v. Estate of Jeffrey Epstein GVI's First Amended Complaint Page 36 of 55 + +199. At all times material herein, each Defendant conspired with Epstein and other Defendants to fulfill the primary criminal purposes of the Epstein Enterprise: human trafficking, forced labor, and sexual servitude. 14 V.I.C. §604(j). + +200. At all times material herein, Defendants engaged in apattern of criminal activity that was not isolated but was related to the affairs of the Epstein Enterprise in violation of CICO. 14V.I.C. §600 et seq. + +#### COUNT THIRTEEN Rape in the Second Degree Violation of the Criminally Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act ("CICO"), 14V.I.C. § 600 et seq.; 14 V.I.0 § 1702 + +201. The Government restates and realleges paragraphs I- 200 of this Complaint as if fully set forth herein. + +202. At all times material herein, each Defendant directly and indirectly participated in or associated with the Epstein Enterprise, an illicit enterprise. + +203. The Epstein Enterprise engaged in two or more occasions of conduct that constitute criminal predicate acts as defined by CICO, including, but not limited to, conduct that constituted or facilitated the rape of girls under 18 years of age. + +204. Epstein and others who engaged in rape were over 18 years old at the time of the incidents. + +205. As a result of the Epstein Enterprise's actions, numerous minors suffered serious physical, mental and emotional injury. + +206. Defendants through a pattern of criminal activity acquired and maintained, directly or indirectly, an interest in or control of the Epstein Enterprise or real property. + +207. Defendants benefited, directly and indirectly, from the pattern of criminal activity conducted by the Epstein Enterprise. + +208. At all times material herein, Defendants engaged in a pattern of criminal activity that was not isolated but was related to the affairs of the Epstein Enterprise in violation of CICO. 14 V.1.C. §600 et seq. + +#### COUNT FOURTEEN Rape in the Second Degree Conspiracy to Violate the Criminally Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 14 V.LC. § 600 et seq.; 14 V.I.0 § 1702 + +209. The Government restates and realleges paragraphs 1-208 of this Complaint as if fully set forth herein. + +210. At all times material herein, each Defendant joined in a conspiracy to violate laws prohibiting rape in the second degree. + +211. Each Defendant engaged in acts that revealed its intent to join and participate in the criminal conspiracy by engaging in conduct that constituted or facilitated the rape of girls under 18 years of age. + +212. Epstein and others who engaged in rape were over 18 years old at the time of the incidents. + +GVI v. Estate of Jeffrey Epstein GVI's First Amended Complaint Page 38 of 55 + +213. As a result of Defendants' actions, numerous minors suffered serious physical, mental and emotional injury. + +214. Defendants knowingly benefited financially and/or obtained other non-financial value from participation in the Epstein Enterprise, which has engaged in human trafficking, forced labor, sexual servitude and commercial sexual activity of girls and young women in knowing or reckless disregard of the laws of the Virgin Islands. + +215. At all times material herein, each Defendant conspired with Epstein and other Defendants to fulfill the primary criminal purposes of the Epstein Enterprise: human trafficking, forced labor, and sexual servitude. 14 V.I.C. §604(j). + +216. At all times material herein, Defendants engaged in apattern of criminal activity that was not isolated but was related to the affairs of the Epstein Enterprise in violation of CICO. 14V.I.C. §600 et seq. + +#### COUNT FIFTEEN Unlawful Sexual Contact in the First or Second Degree Violation of the Criminally Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act ("CICO"), 14 V.I.C. § 600 et seq.; 14 V.I.0 §§ 1708 and 1709 + +217. The Government restates and realleges paragraphs I- 216 of this Complaint as if as if fully set forth herein. + +218. At all times material herein, each Defendant directly and indirectly participated in or associated with the Epstein Enterprise, an illicit enterprise. + +219. The Epstein Enterprise engaged in two or more occasions of conduct that constitute criminal predicate acts as defined by CICO, including, but not limited to, using or facilitating the + +GVI v. Estate of Jeffrey Epstein GVI's First Amended Complaint Page 39 of 55 + +use of force or coercion to accomplish sexual contact or engaging in sexual contact with a minor between 13 and 16 years of age. + +220. Epstein and others who engaged in the sexual contact were over 18 years old at the time of the incidents. + +221. As a result of the Epstein Enterprise's actions numerous young women and minors suffered serious physical, mental and emotional injury. + +222. Defendants through a pattern of criminal activity acquired and maintained, directly or indirectly, an interest in or control of the Epstein Enterprise or real property. + +223. Defendants benefited, directly and indirectly, from the pattern of criminal activity conducted by the Epstein Enterprise. + +224. At all times material herein, Defendants engaged in a pattern of criminal activity that was not isolated but was related to the affairs of the Epstein Enterprise in violation of CICO 14 V.I.C. §600 es seq. + +#### COUNT SIXTEEN Unlawful Sexual Contact in the First or Second Degree Conspiracy to Violate the Criminally Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 14 V.I.C. § 600 et seq.; 14 V.I.0 §§ 1708 and 1709 + +225. The Government restates and realleges paragraphs 1 - 224 of this Complaint as if as if fully set forth herein. + +226. At all times material herein, each Defendant joined in a conspiracy to violate laws prohibiting unlawful sexual contact. + +227. Each Defendant engaged in acts that revealed its intent to join and participate in the criminal conspiracy by using or facilitating the use of force or coercion to accomplish sexual contact or engaging in sexual contact with a minor between 13 and 16 years of age. + +GVI v. Estate of Jeffrey Epstein GVI's First Amended Complaint Page 40 of 55 + +228. Epstein and others who engaged in the sexual contact were over 18 years old at the time of the incidents. + +229. As a result of Defendants' actions. numerous young women and minors suffered serious physical, mental and emotional injury. + +230. Defendants knowingly benefited financially and/or obtained other non-financial value from participation in the Epstein Enterprise, which has engaged in human trafficking, forced labor, sexual servitude and commercial sexual activity of girls and young women in knowing or reckless disregard of the laws of the Virgin Islands. + +231. At all times material herein, each Defendant conspired with Epstein and other Defendants to fulfill the primary criminal purposes of the Epstein Enterprise: human trafficking, forced labor, and sexual servitude. 14 V.1.C. §604(j). + +232. At all times material herein, Defendants engaged in a pattern of criminal activity that was not isolated but was related to the affairs of the Epstein Enterprise in violation of CICO 14 V.I.C. §600 seq. + +#### COUNT SEVENTEEN Prostitution and Keeping House of Prostitution Violation of the Criminally Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act ("CICO"), 14 V.I.C. § 600 et seq.: 14 V.I.C. §§ 1622, 1624 + +233. The Government restates and realleges paragraphs 1 - 232 of this Complaint as if fully set forth herein. + +234. At all times material herein, each Defendant directly and indirectly participated in or associated with the Epstein Enterprise, an illicit enterprise. + +235. The Epstein Enterprise engaged in two or more occasions of conduct that constitute criminal predicate acts as defined by CICO, including the engaging in or facilitating the knowing and/or reckless abuse of minors through the acts alleged herein. + +236. The Epstein Enterprise knowingly persuaded, induced, enticed, and/or coerced women and children to travel to the Virgin Islands to engage in prostitution and/or sexual activity, and/or attempted to do the same. + +237. The Epstein Enterprise kept, maintained, and/or permitted his property at Little St. James to be used for the purpose of prostitution, lewdness or assignation with knowledge or reasonable cause to know the same. + +238. The Epstein Enterprise received or offered or agreed to receive women and children at his property at Little St. James for the purposes of prostitution, lewdness or assignation, and/or permitted women and children to remain there for such purposes. + +239. The Epstein Enterprise directed, took, transported, and or offered or agreed to take or transport women and children to Little St. James with the knowledge or reasonable cause to know that the purpose of such directing, taking or transporting was prostitution, lewdness or assignation. + +240. The Epstein Enterprise knew or should reasonably have known that individuals that were the subjects of the actions described in this Count were minors. + +241. As a result of Defendants' actions, numerous young women and minors suffered serious physical, mental and emotional injury. + +242. Defendants through a pattern of criminal activity acquired and maintained, directly or indirectly, an interest in or control of the Epstein Enterprise or real property. + +GVI v. Estate of Jeffrey Epstein GVI's First Amended Complaint Page 42 of 55 + +243. Defendants benefited, directly and indirectly, from the pattern of criminal activity conducted by the Epstein Enterprise. + +244. At all times material herein, Defendants engaged in apattern of criminal activity that was not isolated but was related to the affairs of the Epstein Enterprise in violation of CICO. 14V.I.C. §600 e1 seq. + +#### COUNT EIGHTEEN Prostitution and Keeping House of Prostitution Conspiracy to Violate the Criminally Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 14V.I.C. § 600 et seq.: 14 V.1.C. §§ 1622, 1624. + +245. The Government restated and realleges paragraph I - 244 of this Complaint as if fully set forth herein. + +246. At all times material herein, each Defendant joined aconspiracy to laws against prostitution. + +247. Each Defendant engaged in acts that revealed its intent to join and participate in the criminal conspiracy by engaging in or facilitating the persuasion, inducement, enticement or coercion of women and children to travel to the Virgin Islands to engage in prostitution and/or sexual activity, and/or attempted to do the same; keeping, maintaining, and/or permitting Epstein's property at Little St. James, to be used for the purpose of prostitution, lewdness or assignation with knowledge or reasonable cause to know the same; receiving, offering, or agreeing to receive individuals at his property at Little St. James for the purposes of prostitution, lewdness or assignation, and/or permitted women and children to remain there for such purposes; and directing, taking, transporting, and/or offering or agreeing to take or transport women and children to Little St. James with the knowledge or reasonable cause to know that the purpose of such directing, + +GVI v. Estate of Jeffrey Epstein GVI's First Amended Complaint Page 43 of 55 + +taking or transporting was prostitution, lewdness or assignation, in violation of 14 V.I.C. §§ 1622 and 1624. + +248. Defendants knew or should reasonably have known that individuals that were the subjects of the actions described in this Count were minors. + +249. As a result of Defendants' actions numerous young women and minors suffered serious physical, mental and emotional injury. + +250. Defendants knowingly benefited financially and/or obtained other non-financial value from participation in the Epstein Enterprise, which has engaged in human trafficking, forced labor, sexual servitude and commercial sexual activity of girls and young women in knowing or reckless disregard of the laws of the Virgin Islands. + +251. At all times material herein, each Defendant conspired with Epstein and other Defendants to fulfill the primary criminal purposes of the Epstein Enterprise: human trafficking, forced labor, and sexual servitude. 14 V.I.C. §604(j). + +252. At all times material herein, Defendants engaged in a pattern of criminal activity that was not isolated but was related to the affairs of the Epstein Enterprise in violation of CICO 14 V.I.C. §600 et seq. + +GVI v. Estate of Jeffrey Epstein GVl's First Amended Complaint Page 44 of 55 + +#### COUNT NINETEEN Sex Offender Registry + +# Violation of the Criminally Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act ("CICO"), 14V.I.C. § 600 et seq.: 14 V.I.C. § 1721 et seq. + +253. The Government restates and realleges paragraphs I- 240 of this Complaint as if fully set forth herein. + +254. Epstein was required to, and did, register under the Virgin Islands Sexual Offender Registration and Community Protection Act ("SORCPA") codified at 14 V.I.C. § 1721 et seq. + +255. SORCPA requires that offenders required to register provide information relating to intended travel in foreign commerce. + +256. On at least two occasions, Epstein traveled to Vienna and Monaco without disclosing that travel to the Virgin Islands sex offender registry. + +257. Epstein's failure to disclose this travel before, during, or even after his travel was knowing. + +258. Epstein's violation SORPCA was part of apattern of criminal activity that was not isolated but was related to the affairs of the Epstein Enterprise. 14 V.I.C. §604(j). + +#### COUNT TWENTY Fraudulent Conveyance + +# Violation of the Criminally Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act ("CICO"), 14V.I.C. § 600 et seq.: 14 V.I.C. §§ 832-833 + +259. The Government restates and realleges paragraphs I - 258 of this Complaint as if fully set forth herein. + +260. At all times material herein, each Defendant directly and indirectly participated in or associated with the Epstein Enterprise, an illicit enterprise. + +GVI v. Estate of Jeffrey Epstein GVI's First Amended Complaint Page 45 of 55 + +261. Each Defendant engaged in two or more occasions of conduct that constitute criminal predicate acts as defined by CICO, including, but not limited to transferring assets to and between various entities controlled by Epstein and the Epstein Enterprise to avoid, defeat, hinder or delay claims against them. + +262. Upon information and belief, in an effort to defeat the claims of creditors and avoid the oversight of the court probating his estate, Epstein, days before his death, transferred significant assets, including assets held by other Defendants, into The 1953 Trust. + +263. At the time of these transfers, Epstein had numerous actions pending against him related to his trafficking and sexual assaults seeking financial judgments. + +264. Through these transfers, Epstein and the Epstein Enterprise fraudulently removed property and effects beyond the jurisdiction of the probate court. + +265. Epstein and the Epstein Enterprise were parties to the fraudulent conveyance of the property, real or personal, and/or the interests or rights arising out of property, contracts, or conveyances of Epstein and the Epstein Enterprise. + +266. Epstein and the Epstein Enterprise acted with the intent to defeat, hinder, or delay creditors and claimants, including the Government of the Virgin Islands, in collecting on their judgements, debts and demands. + +267. Defendants through a pattern of criminal activity acquired and maintained, directly or indirectly, an interest in or control of the Epstein Enterprise or real property. + +268. Defendants benefited, directly and indirectly, from the pattern of criminal activity conducted by the Epstein Enterprise. + +GVI v. Estate of Jeffrey Epstein GVI's First Amended Complaint Page 46 of 55 + +269. At all times material herein, Defendants engaged in a pattern of criminal activity that was not isolated but was related to the affairs of the Epstein Enterprise in violation of CICO. 14 V.I.C. §600 et seq. + +#### COUNT TWENTY-ONE Fraudulent Conveyance Conspiracy to Violate the Criminally Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 14 V.I.C. § 600 et seq.: 14 V.1.C. §§ 832-833 + +270. The Government restates and realleges paragraphs I to 269 of this Complaint as if fully set forth herein. + +271. At all times material herein, each Defendant joined in a conspiracy to commit fraudulent conveyances. + +272. Each Defendant engaged in acts that revealed its intent to join and participate in the criminal conspiracy, including, but not limited to, transferring assets to and between various entities controlled by Epstein and the Epstein Enterprise to avoid, defeat, hinder or delay claims against them. + +273. Upon information and belief, in an effort to defeat the claims of creditors and avoid the oversight of the court probating his estate, Epstein, days before his death, transferred significant assets, including assets held by other Defendants, into The 1953 Trust. + +274. At the time of this transfer, Epstein had numerous actions pending against him related to his trafficking and sexual assaults seeking financial judgments. + +275. Through this transfer, Epstein and the Epstein Enterprise fraudulently removed property and effects beyond the jurisdiction of the probate court. + +GVI v. Estate of Jeffrey Epstein GVI's First Amended Complaint Page 47 of 55 + +276. Epstein and the Epstein Enterprise were parties to the fraudulent conveyance of the property, real or personal, and/or the interests or rights arising out of property, contracts, or conveyances of Epstein and the Epstein Enterprise. + +277. Epstein and the Epstein Enterprise acted with the intent to defeat, hinder, or delay the Government of the Virgin Islands and other creditors and claimants to collect on their judgements, debts and demands. + +278. Defendants knowingly benefited financially and/or obtained other non-financial value from participation in the Epstein Enterprise, which has engaged in human trafficking, forced labor, sexual servitude and commercial sexual activity of girls and young women in knowing or reckless disregard of the laws of the Virgin Islands. + +279. At all times material herein, each Defendant conspired with Epstein and other Defendants to fulfill the primary criminal purposes of the Epstein Enterprise: human trafficking, forced labor, and sexual servitude. 14 V.I.C. §604(j). + +280. At all times material herein, Defendants engaged in a pattern of criminal activity that was not isolated but was related to the affairs of the Epstein Enterprise in violation of CICO. 14 V.I.C. §600 et seq. + +#### COUNT TWENTY-TWO Civil Conspiracy + +281. The Government restates and realleges paragraphs 1 - 280 of this Complaint as if fully set forth herein. + +GVI v. Estate of Jeffrey Epstein GVI's First Amended Complaint Page 48 of 55 + +282. Defendants acted in concert and joined with others to perform the wrongful acts identified in Counts 1 to 13, among others, concealing the sexual abuse of minor females by unlawful means. + +283. Each co-conspirator knew, or in the exercise of reasonable care should have known, about the conduct of the others and about the common unlawful scheme. + +284. These unlawful acts could not have been carried to the length and extent accomplished without the common understanding shared by Epstein and the Epstein Enterprise Defendants. + +285. Each of the Defendants had aduty to report, stop or terminate the wrongful conduct, but instead each Defendant concealed, assisted and furthered the wrongful acts by use of civil conspiracy. + +286. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants' conspiracy, the Virgin Island has been injured. + +287. Each co-conspirator is jointly and severally liable for the acts alleged herein. + +#### COUNT TWENTY-THREE + +Fraudulent Claims Upon the Government + +Violation of the Criminally Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act ("CICO), 14V.I.C. § 600 et seq.; 14 V.I.C. § 843 + +288. The Government restates and realleges paragraphs\_l -287 of this Complaint as if fully set forth herein. + +289. At all times relevant and material herein, each Defendant directly and indirectly participated in or associated with the Epstein Enterprise, an illicit enterprise. + +GVI v. Estate of Jeffrey Epstein GVI's First Amended Complaint Page 49 of 55 + +290. Each Defendant engaged in two or more occasions of conduct that constitute criminal predicate acts as defined by CICO, including, but not limited to, making fraudulent claims upon the Government. + +291. The Epstein Enterprise misrepresented the purpose, activities, employment, and income of the Southern Trust Company, Inc., in order to obtain and maintain valuable tax incentives in order to fund the criminal activities of the Epstein Enterprise. In addition, the Epstein Enterprise used Southern Trust Company to employ, pay, and conceal the activities of participants in the criminal activities of the Enterprise. + +292. The Epstein Enterprise made and presented an application for tax incentives, testimony, and quarterly reports to the EDC, a commission of the Government, regarding the Southern Trust Company, knowing such claims to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent; knowingly and willfully falsified, concealed or covered up material facts regarding the Southern Trust Company; made false or fraudulent statements or representations about the purpose, activities, income, and employment of Southern Trust Company; and made and submitted false affidavits knowing the same to contain any fraudulent or fictitious statement or entry. + +293. These false statements and documents included affidavits, testimony, an application, and other documents that misrepresented that Southern Trust Company was engaged in, and failed to disclose it did not and could not carry out, in its stated purpose of providing consulting services in financial and biomedical informatics. + +294. Defendants knowingly benefited financially and/or obtained other non-financial value from participation in the Epstein Enterprise, which has engaged in human trafficking, forced labor, sexual servitude, and commercial sexual activity of underage girls and young women in knowing and reckless disregard of the laws of the Virgin Islands. + +GVI v. Estate of Jeffrey Epstein GVI's First Amended Complaint Page 50 of 55 + +295. Defendants through a pattern of criminal activity acquired and maintained, directly or indirectly, an interest in or control of the Epstein Enterprise or real property. + +296. Defendants benefited, directly and indirectly, from the pattern of criminal activity conducted by the Epstein Enterprise. + +297. At all times material herein, Defendants engaged in a pattern of criminal activity that was not isolated but was related to the affairs of the Epstein Enterprise in violation of CICO. 14 V.I.C. §600 et seq. + +#### COUNT TWENTY-FOUR + +Fraudulent Claims Upon the Government Conspiracy to Violate the Criminally Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 14 .1.C. § 600 et seq.; 14 V.I.C. § 843 + +298. The Government restates and realleges paragraphs Ito 297 of this Complaint as if fully set forth herein. + +299. At all times material herein, each Defendant joined in a conspiracy to commit fraudulent conveyances. + +300. Each Defendant engaged in acts that revealed its intent to join and participate in the criminal conspiracy. including, but not limited to, transferring assets to and between various entities controlled by Epstein and the Epstein Enterprise to avoid, defeat, hinder or delay claims against them. + +301. The Epstein Enterprise misrepresented the purpose, activities, employment, and income of the Southern Trust Company, Inc., in order to obtain and maintain valuable tax incentives in order to fund the criminal activities of the Epstein Enterprise. In addition, the Epstein Enterprise used Southern Trust Company to employ, pay, and conceal the activities of participants in the criminal activities of the Enterprise. + +302. The Epstein Enterprise made and presented an application for tax incentives, testimony, and quarterly reports to the EDC, a commission of the Government, regarding the Southern Trust Company, knowing such claims to be false, fictitious, or fraudulent; knowingly and willfully falsified, concealed or covered up material facts regarding the Southern Trust Company; made false or fraudulent statements or representations about the purpose, activities, income, and employment of Southern Trust Company; and made and submitted false affidavits knowing the same to contain any fraudulent or fictitious statement or entry. + +303. These false statements and documents included affidavits, testimony, an application, and other documents that misrepresented that Southern Trust Company was engaged in, and failed to disclose it did not and could not carry out, in its stated purpose of providing consulting services in financial and biomedical infonnatics. + +304. Defendants knowingly benefited financially and/or obtained other non-financial value from participation in the Epstein Enterprise, which has engaged in human trafficking, forced labor, sexual servitude, and commercial sexual activity of underage girls and young women in knowing and reckless disregard of the laws of the Virgin Islands. + +305. At all times material herein, each Defendant conspired with Epstein and other Defendants to fulfill the primary criminal purposes of the Epstein Enterprise: human trafficking, forced labor, and sexual servitude. 14 V.I.C. §604(j). + +306. At all times material herein, Defendants engaged in a pattern of criminal activity that was not isolated but was related to the affairs of the Epstein Enterprise in violation of CICO. 14 V.I.C. §600 et seq. + +GVI v. Estate of Jeffrey Epstein GVI's First Amended Complaint Page 52 of 55 + +#### Notice of Allegation of PUNITIVE DAMAGES + +307. The purpose of punitive damages in the common law is to punish the defendant for outrageous conduct that is reckless or intentional and to deter others from engaging in such conduct in the future. + +308. This Complaint describes intentional conduct so egregious, persistent, and injurious that it shocks the conscience and offends a civilized society. + +309. Punitive damages are especially important in the case of persons or companies that have so money, assets, and power that mere fines, penalties, and economic damages are simply not sufficient. + +310. At all times material herein, Epstein and the Epstein Enterprise engaged repeatedly in wrongful acts which were intentional and outrageous. The Government gives notice that it intends to pursue the possibility of punitive damages in any jury verdict. + +#### PRAYER FOR RELIEF + +WHEREFORE, the Government respectfully requests that the Court: + +A. Enter a judgment in favor of the Government and against Defendants on all counts; + +B. Declare that Defendants, through the Epstein Enterprise, have engaged in a pattern of criminal activity in the Virgin Islands including but not limited to human trafficking, forced labor and sexual servitude of female children and young women, unlawful sexual contact, child sexual abuse, child abuse and neglect, rape, prostitution civil conspiracy and other offenses elated offenses, and civil conspiracy; + +GVI v. Estate of Jeffrey Epstein GV1's First Amended Complaint Page 53 of 55 + +C. Pursuant to 14 V.I.C. § 610, enforce and maintain the criminal activity liens the Government is filing contemporaneously with this lawsuit, or shall file in connection with this action; + +D. Pursuant to 14 V.1.C. § 607(a)( I ) and 14 V.I.C. § 141, issue an order forfeiting and divesting in favor of the Government of the Virgin Islands all of Defendants' interests in any real and personal property within the territory of the U.S. Virgin Islands used to facilitate the criminal enterprise carried out by the Epstein Enterprise, including but not limited to Little St. James Island and Greater St. James Island; + +E. Issue an order forfeiting to the Government of the Virgin Islands any proceeds or funds obtained by Defendants, whether directly or indirectly, during the course of the criminal activity of the Epstein Enterprise; + +F. Pursuant to 14 V.I.C. § 607(a)( I ), require Defendants to divest themselves of any real property or other interests in favor of the Government of the Virgin Islands used to further the goals of the Epstein Enterprise; + +G. Pursuant to 14 V.I.C. § 607(a)(3) and (5), order the dissolution of the Epstein Enterprise, including but not limited to, order the dissolution of the corporate Defendants; + +H. Pursuant to 14 V.I.C. § 607(a)(2) enter an injunction to prevent the further criminal conduct, and concealment of the criminal conduct, by the Epstein Enterprise; + +I. Pursuant to 14 V.I.C. § 607(a)(4), order the revocation of any and all licenses, permits and approvals that had been granted by any agency of the Territory, and require the repayment of any tax benefits that had been bestowed on any Defendant; + +J. Pursuant to 14 V.I.C. § 607(a)(6)(e), award the Government the maximum civil penalty for each and every violation of law committed by the Epstein Enterprise; + +GVI v. Estate of Jeffrey Epstein +GVI's First Amended Complaint +Page 54 of 55 + +K. Pursuant to 14 V.I.C. § 607, award treble damages and all other available remedies, including attorneys' fees and costs; + +L. Award compensatory and punitive damages for Defendants' civil conspiracy; + +M. Void the transfer of assets as fraudulently conveyed to the The 1953 Trust; + +N. Award such equitable relief, including disgorgement of all ill-gotten gains, as may be just and proper and appropriate, pursuant to 14 V.I.C. § 608(c)(4), to protect the rights of victims and innocent persons in the interest of justice and consistent with the purposes of CICO; + +O. Assess and award a judgment in favor of the Government and against the Defendants for attorneys' fees and costs and pre- and post-judgment interest; and + +P. Award any and all other relief this Court deems appropriate. + +**The Government demands a jury trial on all issues so triable.** + +**SEARCHED \_\_\_\_\_** +**SERIALIZED \_\_\_\_\_** +**INDEXED \_\_\_\_\_** +**FILED \_\_\_\_\_** +**JUN 27 2010** +**FBI - CHICAGO** + +**RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,** + +Dated: February 5, 2020 + +**GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES +VIRGIN ISLANDS** + +![]()**DENISE N. [REDACTED] ESQUIRE** + +**ATTORNEY GENERAL** + +V.I. Department of Justice +Office of the Attorney General +34-38 Kronprindsens Gade +GERS Building, 2nd Floor +St. [REDACTED] U.S.V.I. 00802 +Telephone: (340) 774-5666 +Email: [REDACTED] +Email: [REDACTED] [n@doj.vi.gov](mailto:n@doj.vi.gov) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737314/EFTA02737314.metadata.json b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737314/EFTA02737314.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..92ac73ca95b5699c2c7d8b9fb4590a6d1ca8437f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737314/EFTA02737314.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,2947 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737314.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 55, + "chars": 93061, + "elapsed_seconds": 17.54, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "EXHIBIT B", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 182.988, + 325.92437744140625 + ], + [ + 437.3786315917969, + 325.92437744140625 + ], + [ + 437.3786315917969, + 376.4027099609375 + ], + [ + 182.988, + 376.4027099609375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. [REDACTED] AND ST. JOHN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 143.11499999999998, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 451.269, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 451.269, + 95.58 + ], + [ + 143.11499999999998, + 95.58 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ACTION FOR DAMAGES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 362.35499999999996, + 195.20999999999998 + ], + [ + 509.12399999999997, + 195.20999999999998 + ], + [ + 509.12399999999997, + 208.17000000000002 + ], + [ + 362.35499999999996, + 208.17000000000002 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "JURY TRIAL DEMANDED", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 362.35499999999996, + 236.51999999999998 + ], + [ + 509.12399999999997, + 236.51999999999998 + ], + [ + 509.12399999999997, + 250.28999999999996 + ], + [ + 362.35499999999996, + 250.28999999999996 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 205.233, + 456.8399999999999 + ], + [ + 386.71500000000003, + 456.8399999999999 + ], + [ + 386.71500000000003, + 470.6099999999999 + ], + [ + 205.233, + 470.6099999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "JURISDICTION AND PARTIES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 208.27800000000002, + 567.81 + ], + [ + 383.06100000000004, + 567.81 + ], + [ + 383.06100000000004, + 580.77 + ], + [ + 208.27800000000002, + 580.77 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 224.112, + 472.23 + ], + [ + 386.099609375, + 472.23 + ], + [ + 386.099609375, + 487.3780517578125 + ], + [ + 224.112, + 487.3780517578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A. The Conduct of the \"Epstein Enterprise\" in the Virgin Islands", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 104.13900000000001, + 485.18999999999994 + ], + [ + 474.96673583984375, + 485.18999999999994 + ], + [ + 474.96673583984375, + 504.3997802734375 + ], + [ + 104.13900000000001, + 504.3997802734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B. The \"Epstein Enterprise\" Abused Privileges of Residency to Carry out its \nCriminal Scheme", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 98.04899999999999, + 233.27999999999997 + ], + [ + 535.714111328125, + 233.27999999999997 + ], + [ + 535.714111328125, + 263.22802734375 + ], + [ + 98.04899999999999, + 263.22802734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "C. The \"Epstein Enterprise\" Fraudulently Concealed its Conduct", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 97.888, + 332.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 440.4769592285156, + 332.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 440.4769592285156, + 349.1080322265625 + ], + [ + 97.888, + 349.1080322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "D. The \"Epstein Enterprise\" Violated Numerous Virgin Islands Laws", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 98.04899999999999, + 85.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 460.9449462890625, + 85.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 460.9449462890625, + 100.55853271484375 + ], + [ + 98.04899999999999, + 100.55853271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "E. The Epstein Enterprise Used Corporate Entities to Defraud the Government and \nFund its Criminal Activities", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 21, + "polygon": [ + [ + 98.658, + 224.37 + ], + [ + 535.311, + 224.37 + ], + [ + 535.311, + 253.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 98.658, + 253.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT ONE \nHuman Trafficking \u2014 Trafficking an Individual \nViolation of the Criminally Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (\"CICO\"), \n14 V.I.C. \u00a7 600 et seq.; and 14 V.I.0 \u00a7133", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 23, + "polygon": [ + [ + 88.16, + 364.139 + ], + [ + 509.8503723144531, + 364.139 + ], + [ + 509.8503723144531, + 420.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 88.16, + 420.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT TWO \nHuman Trafficking \u2014 Trafficking an Individual \nConspiracy to Violate the Criminally Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act \n14 V.I.C. \u00a7 600 et seq. and 14 V.I.0 \u00a7133", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 24, + "polygon": [ + [ + 115.45999908447266, + 362.88 + ], + [ + 532.0, + 362.88 + ], + [ + 532.0, + 419.9630126953125 + ], + [ + 115.45999908447266, + 419.9630126953125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT THREE \nHuman Trafficking \u2014 Forced Labor \nViolation of the Criminally Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (\"CICO\"), \n14 V.I.C. \u00a7 600 et seq.; and 14 V.I.0 \u00a7134", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 25, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.357, + 391.23 + ], + [ + 529.91748046875, + 391.23 + ], + [ + 529.91748046875, + 448.18853759765625 + ], + [ + 105.357, + 448.18853759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT FOUR \nHuman Trafficking \u2014 Forced Labor \nConspiracy to Violate the Criminally Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, \n14 V.I.C. \u00a7 600 et seq.; and 14 V.I.0 \u00a7134", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 26, + "polygon": [ + [ + 111.68799999999999, + 502.20000000000005 + ], + [ + 532.0303344726562, + 502.20000000000005 + ], + [ + 532.0303344726562, + 560.4405822753906 + ], + [ + 111.68799999999999, + 560.4405822753906 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT FIVE \nHuman Trafficking \u2014 Sexual Servitude \nViolation of the Criminally Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (\"CICO\"), \n14 V.I.C. \u00a7 600 et seq.; 14 V.I.0 \u00a7135", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 27, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.792, + 460.0799999999999 + ], + [ + 528.9703979492188, + 460.0799999999999 + ], + [ + 528.9703979492188, + 517.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 105.792, + 517.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT SIX \nHuman Trafficking \u2014 Sexual Servitude \nConspiracy to Violate the Criminally Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act \n14 V.I.C. \u00a7 600 et seq.; 14 V.I.0 \u00a7135", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 28, + "polygon": [ + [ + 96.831, + 557.968 + ], + [ + 510.95099999999996, + 557.968 + ], + [ + 510.95099999999996, + 614.1635131835938 + ], + [ + 96.831, + 614.1635131835938 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT SEVEN \nHuman Trafficking \u2014 Patronizing Minors and Victims of Sexual Servitude \nViolation of the Criminally Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (\"CICO\"), \n14V.I.C. \u00a7 600 et seq.; 14 V.I.0 \u00a7\u00a7 136-37", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 30, + "polygon": [ + [ + 116.544, + 89.91 + ], + [ + 539.5184936523438, + 89.91 + ], + [ + 539.5184936523438, + 148.87060546875 + ], + [ + 116.544, + 148.87060546875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT EIGHT \nHuman Trafficking \u2014 Patronizing Minors and Victims of Sexual Servitude \nConspiracy to Violate the Criminally Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act \n14 V.I.C. \u00a7 600 et seq.; 14 V.I.0 \u00a7\u00a7 136-37", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 31, + "polygon": [ + [ + 106.83199999999998, + 170.91 + ], + [ + 525.6619999999999, + 170.91 + ], + [ + 525.6619999999999, + 227.6080322265625 + ], + [ + 106.83199999999998, + 227.6080322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT NINE \nChild Abuse and Neglect \nViolation of the Criminally Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act (\"CICO\"), \n14 V.I.C. \u00a7 600 et seq.; 14 V.I.0 \u00a7\u00a7 505, 506 and 507", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 32, + "polygon": [ + [ + 97.72699999999999, + 255.46499999999997 + ], + [ + 511.1138916015625, + 255.46499999999997 + ], + [ + 511.1138916015625, + 312.235 + ], + [ + 97.72699999999999, + 312.235 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT TEN \nChild Abuse and Neglect \nConspiracy to Violate the Criminally Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, \n14 V.I.C. \u00a7 600 et seq.; 14 V.I.0 \u00a7\u00a7 505, 506 and 507", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 33, + "polygon": [ + [ + 88.30499999999999, + 225.18 + ], + [ + 507.29699999999997, + 225.18 + ], + [ + 507.29699999999997, + 282.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 88.30499999999999, + 282.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT ELEVEN \nAggravated Rape \nViolation of the Criminally Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act (\"CICO\"), \n14V.I.C. \u00a7 600 et seq.; 14 V.I.0 \u00a7 1700a", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 34, + "polygon": [ + [ + 98.49600000000001, + 254.65400000000002 + ], + [ + 517.5448608398438, + 254.65400000000002 + ], + [ + 517.5448608398438, + 314.3031311035156 + ], + [ + 98.49600000000001, + 314.3031311035156 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT TWELVE \nAggravated Rape \nConspiracy to Violate the Criminally Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, \n14 V.I.C. \u00a7 600 et seq.; 14 V.I.0 \u00a7 1700a", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 35, + "polygon": [ + [ + 98.49600000000001, + 225.18 + ], + [ + 518.67236328125, + 225.18 + ], + [ + 518.67236328125, + 282.43353271484375 + ], + [ + 98.49600000000001, + 282.43353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT THIRTEEN \nRape in the Second Degree \nViolation of the Criminally Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act (\"CICO\"), \n14V.I.C. \u00a7 600 et seq.; 14 V.I.0 \u00a7 1702", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 36, + "polygon": [ + [ + 99.712, + 366.572 + ], + [ + 516.7192993164062, + 366.572 + ], + [ + 516.7192993164062, + 424.1859436035156 + ], + [ + 99.712, + 424.1859436035156 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT FOURTEEN \nRape in the Second Degree \nConspiracy to Violate the Criminally Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, \n14 V.LC. \u00a7 600 et seq.; 14 V.I.0 \u00a7 1702", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 98.33399999999999, + 406.62 + ], + [ + 515.9499999999999, + 406.62 + ], + [ + 515.9499999999999, + 463.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 98.33399999999999, + 463.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT FIFTEEN \nUnlawful Sexual Contact in the First or Second Degree \nViolation of the Criminally Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act (\"CICO\"), \n14 V.I.C. \u00a7 600 et seq.; 14 V.I.0 \u00a7\u00a7 1708 and 1709", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 38, + "polygon": [ + [ + 97.44, + 449.55000000000007 + ], + [ + 516.0164794921875, + 449.55000000000007 + ], + [ + 516.0164794921875, + 506.43682861328125 + ], + [ + 97.44, + 506.43682861328125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT SIXTEEN \nUnlawful Sexual Contact in the First or Second Degree \nConspiracy to Violate the Criminally Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, \n14 V.I.C. \u00a7 600 et seq.; 14 V.I.0 \u00a7\u00a7 1708 and 1709", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 39, + "polygon": [ + [ + 98.658, + 450.36 + ], + [ + 519.137451171875, + 450.36 + ], + [ + 519.137451171875, + 506.6835632324219 + ], + [ + 98.658, + 506.6835632324219 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT SEVENTEEN \nProstitution and Keeping House of Prostitution \nViolation of the Criminally Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (\"CICO\"), \n14 V.I.C. \u00a7 600 et seq.: 14 V.I.C. \u00a7\u00a7 1622, 1624", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 40, + "polygon": [ + [ + 94.24000000000001, + 477.09000000000003 + ], + [ + 516.192, + 477.09000000000003 + ], + [ + 516.192, + 533.2230224609375 + ], + [ + 94.24000000000001, + 533.2230224609375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT EIGHTEEN \nProstitution and Keeping House of Prostitution \nConspiracy to Violate the Criminally Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, \n14V.I.C. \u00a7 600 et seq.: 14 V.1.C. \u00a7\u00a7 1622, 1624.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 42, + "polygon": [ + [ + 107.00800000000001, + 255.46499999999997 + ], + [ + 526.9144287109375, + 255.46499999999997 + ], + [ + 526.9144287109375, + 314.76434326171875 + ], + [ + 107.00800000000001, + 314.76434326171875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT NINETEEN \nSex Offender Registry", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 44, + "polygon": [ + [ + 251.10399999999998, + 90.72 + ], + [ + 370.65228271484375, + 90.72 + ], + [ + 370.65228271484375, + 121.1810302734375 + ], + [ + 251.10399999999998, + 121.1810302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Violation of the Criminally Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (\"CICO\"), \n14V.I.C. \u00a7 600 et seq.: 14 V.I.C. \u00a7 1721 et seq.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 44, + "polygon": [ + [ + 99.712, + 117.44999999999999 + ], + [ + 522.5823974609375, + 117.44999999999999 + ], + [ + 522.5823974609375, + 151.67327880859375 + ], + [ + 99.712, + 151.67327880859375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT TWENTY \nFraudulent Conveyance", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 44, + "polygon": [ + [ + 241.984, + 507.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 369.630615234375, + 507.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 369.630615234375, + 537.5923919677734 + ], + [ + 241.984, + 537.5923919677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Violation of the Criminally Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (\"CICO\"), \n14V.I.C. \u00a7 600 et seq.: 14 V.I.C. \u00a7\u00a7 832-833", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 44, + "polygon": [ + [ + 96.06400000000001, + 533.79 + ], + [ + 517.6737060546875, + 533.79 + ], + [ + 517.6737060546875, + 567.2655487060547 + ], + [ + 96.06400000000001, + 567.2655487060547 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT TWENTY-ONE \nFraudulent Conveyance \nConspiracy to Violate the Criminally Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, \n14 V.I.C. \u00a7 600 et seq.: 14 V.1.C. \u00a7\u00a7 832-833", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 46, + "polygon": [ + [ + 97.31999969482422, + 200.15887451171875 + ], + [ + 515.2139999999999, + 200.15887451171875 + ], + [ + 515.2139999999999, + 259.20000000000005 + ], + [ + 97.31999969482422, + 259.20000000000005 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT TWENTY-TWO \nCivil Conspiracy", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 47, + "polygon": [ + [ + 226.411, + 558.0899999999999 + ], + [ + 365.4495849609375, + 558.0899999999999 + ], + [ + 365.4495849609375, + 587.2280120849609 + ], + [ + 226.411, + 587.2280120849609 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT TWENTY-THREE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 48, + "polygon": [ + [ + 232.638, + 502.20000000000005 + ], + [ + 384.1410217285156, + 502.20000000000005 + ], + [ + 384.1410217285156, + 517.1888427734375 + ], + [ + 232.638, + 517.1888427734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT TWENTY-FOUR", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 50, + "polygon": [ + [ + 234.302, + 308.61 + ], + [ + 376.34, + 308.61 + ], + [ + 376.34, + 323.29852294921875 + ], + [ + 234.302, + 323.29852294921875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Notice of Allegation of \nPUNITIVE DAMAGES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 52, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.70001220703125, + 88.78387451171875 + ], + [ + 387.266, + 88.78387451171875 + ], + [ + 387.266, + 116.66851806640625 + ], + [ + 258.70001220703125, + 116.66851806640625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PRAYER FOR RELIEF", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 52, + "polygon": [ + [ + 239.15800000000002, + 433.04388427734375 + ], + [ + 369.2239990234375, + 433.04388427734375 + ], + [ + 369.2239990234375, + 447.04852294921875 + ], + [ + 239.15800000000002, + 447.04852294921875 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 3 + ], + [ + "Line", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 9 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 348 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 329 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 367 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 336 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 372 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 298 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 30, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 287 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 31, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 32, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 33, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 34, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 305 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 35, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 36, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 245 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 37, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 38, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 291 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 39, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 40, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 41, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 42, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 321 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 43, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 41 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 44, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 276 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 45, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 46, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 47, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 48, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 265 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 49, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 50, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 51, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 52, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 53, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 54, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Text", + 32 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737314" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737369/EFTA02737369.md b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737369/EFTA02737369.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f46d0afa09411c819d5dd2a5677b944e5168afc3 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737369/EFTA02737369.md @@ -0,0 +1,54 @@ +## EXHIBIT C + +![](_page_1_Picture_24.jpeg) + +# SHERIFF'S CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +## PERSONAL DELIVERY + +SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK +COUNTY OF NEW YORK + +Index No. 156728/19 +Hearing Date: 08/27/2019 +Sheriff's Case # 19031516 + +IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION + +[REDACTED] + +PETITIONER, + +FOR AN ORDER PURSUANT TO SECTION 3102(c) +OF THE CIVIL PRACTICE LAW AND RULES +TO COMPEL DISCLOSURE FROM + +JEFFREY EDWARD EPSTEIN AND +JANE DOES 1-3, +RESPONDENTS. + +STATE OF NEW YORK} +COUNTY OF NEW YORK} SS: + +I, **QIN ZHANG**, Deputy Sheriff of the City and State of New York, authorized pursuant to my special duties to serve process, hereby certify that: I am not a party to this action or proceeding and over 18 years of age. I further certify that on 7/22/2019, at approximately **10:15 AM** at **150 PARK ROW** in the borough of **MANHATTAN**, County of **NEW YORK**, I served the annexed: **ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE & VERIFIED PETITION & EXHIBITS & SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS** upon **JEFFREY EPSTEIN**, in the following manner: + +**[X] PERSONAL DELIVERY** + +By delivering to and leaving with **JEFFREY EPSTEIN** personally a true copy thereof, said person being known as the respondent mentioned and described herein. + +**[X] DESCRIPTION:** + +Skin Complexion: **LIGHT**, Gender: **Male**, Approx. Age: **66** years old, +Height: **5'10"**, Weight: **240** lbs., Hair Color: [REDACTED] + +I understand that false statements made herein are punishable as a class A misdemeanor pursuant to Penal Law §210.45. + +Dated: 7/24/2019 + +SHERIFF OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK +[REDACTED] FUCITO + +BY: *Qin Zhang* +QIN ZHANG +DEPUTY SHERIFF +SHIELD # 482 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737369/EFTA02737369.metadata.json b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737369/EFTA02737369.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1c66ca5aaaae59a8d8a4c20e5bbc099d7abc3a1b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737369/EFTA02737369.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,187 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737369.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1631, + "elapsed_seconds": 7.38, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_1_Picture_24.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "EXHIBIT C", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 182.988, + 325.62 + ], + [ + 435.4557189941406, + 325.62 + ], + [ + 435.4557189941406, + 376.4027099609375 + ], + [ + 182.988, + 376.4027099609375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SHERIFF'S CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE PERSONAL DELIVERY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 128.51999999999998, + 44.55 + ], + [ + 462.06000000000006, + 44.55 + ], + [ + 462.06000000000006, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 128.51999999999998, + 81.0 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "[X] PERSONAL DELIVERY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 39.78, + 421.20000000000005 + ], + [ + 168.3, + 421.20000000000005 + ], + [ + 168.3, + 433.35 + ], + [ + 39.78, + 433.35 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "[X] DESCRIPTION:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 39.78, + 477.9 + ], + [ + 131.57999999999998, + 477.9 + ], + [ + 131.57999999999998, + 490.04999999999995 + ], + [ + 39.78, + 490.04999999999995 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 3 + ], + [ + "Line", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 30 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737369" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737369/_page_1_Picture_24.jpeg b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737369/_page_1_Picture_24.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ac8fb794458499860ae3a40ba0f52b64611c4d07 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737369/_page_1_Picture_24.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:16c671001b42581ee7340df8f8eba13747f2fd9aa5ad638dd3af51aa094a156f +size 10645 diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737371/EFTA02737371.md b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737371/EFTA02737371.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..085d22129e5b50e53b9f407ee7b07b0bf35abdcd --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737371/EFTA02737371.md @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@ +## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK + +x + +Case No. 19 Civ. 10788 (GHW) (DCF) + +Plaintiff, + +-against- + +DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, as EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, + +Defendants. + +x + +## DECLARATION OF DANIEL MULLKOFF + +Daniel Mullkoff, Esq. declares under penalty of perjury, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746, that the following is true and correct to the best of my knowledge: + +- 1. 1 am an attorney admitted to practice in this Court and am an associate at Cuti Hecker Wang LLP, which, along with Allred, Maroko & Goldberg, represents Plaintiff in this matter. I submit this declaration in opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF 26). +- 2. Attached as Exhibit A hereto is a true and correct copy of the Last Will and Testament of Jeffrey E. Epstein, dated August 8, 2019. +- 3. Attached as Exhibit B hereto is a true and correct copy of the First Amended Complaint filed by the Government of the United States Virgin Islands on February 5, 2020 in Government of the United States Virgin Islands v. Indyke et al. in the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands. +- 4. Attached as Exhibit C hereto is a true and correct copy of an Affidavit of Service filed on July 29, 2019 in v. Epstein, Index No. 156728/2019, in the Supreme Court of the State New York, County of New York. + +Dated: March 27, 2020 + +New York, New York /s/ Daniel Mullkoff Daniel Mullkoff \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737371/EFTA02737371.metadata.json b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737371/EFTA02737371.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..09d918f4005b8a141026e3613d2edc73a3f9c387 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737371/EFTA02737371.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,143 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737371.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1400, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.65, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 70.38, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 282.5284118652344, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 282.5284118652344, + 101.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 70.38, + 101.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DECLARATION OF DANIEL MULLKOFF", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 188.496, + 306.99 + ], + [ + 425.6033020019531, + 306.99 + ], + [ + 425.6033020019531, + 321.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 188.496, + 321.7330322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 7 + ], + [ + "Line", + 4 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737371" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737373/EFTA02737373.md b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737373/EFTA02737373.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c6c81e7d1e1841e588879f6c1e1956f50430c231 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737373/EFTA02737373.md @@ -0,0 +1,197 @@ +#### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK + +Plaintiff, + +v. + +DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, as executors of the ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, + +Defendants. + +Case No. 1:19-cv-10788 (GHW) (DCF) + +#### DEFENDANTS' REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT + +TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP 875 Third Avenue New York, New York 10022 Tel: 212-704-6000 Fax: 212-704-6288 + +Attorneys for Defendants + +## TABLE OF CONTENTS + +| ARGUMENT | Page | +|----------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------| +| I. REGARDLESS OF ITS TITLE | THIS MOTION IS PROCEDURALLY PROPER AND RIPE, | +| II. | PLAINTIFF INVOKES INAPPLICABLE LIMITATIONS STATUTES | +| AND TOLLING PRINCIPLES | 3 | +| HI. | PLAINTIFF DISREGARDS BLACK-LETTER LAW ESTABLISHING | +| | PUNITIVE DAMAGES ARE BARRED HERE 7 | +| A. | PLAINTIFF'S BANKS ANALYSIS AND SUPPORTING ARGUMENTS | +| ARE ERRONEOUS | 9 | +| CONCLUSION | 10 | + +#### TABLE OF AUTHORITIES + +| Cases Allied Irish Banks, PLC. v. Bank of Am., N.A., Nissen v. Eisensmidt, 940 F. Supp. 449 (N.D.N.Y. 1996) Burrell v. State Farm & Cas. Co., 226 F. Supp. 2d 427 (S.D.N.Y 2002) Omar ex reL Cannon v. Lindsey, 2008) .v.=, 926 F. Supp. 399 (S.D.N.Y. 1996) v. Monahan, 832 So. 2d 708 (Sup. Ct. Fl. 2002) Denton v. McKee, | Page(s) 2, 8, 9 7 3 5 3 2 5 | +|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------| +| 332 F. Supp. 2d 659 (S.D.N.Y. 2004) Doe v. Montefiore Med. Ctr., | 2 | +| No. 12-cv-686 (CM), 2013 WL 624688 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 19, 2013) Farina v. Metro. Transportation Auth., | 2 | +| No. 18-cv-1433 (PKC), 2019 WL 3966163 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 21, 2019) Fed. Nous. Fin. Agency v. Ally Fin. Inc., | 2 | +| No. 11-cv-7010 (DLC), 2012 WL 6616061 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 19, 2012) Ghartey v. St. John's Queens Hosp., 869 F.2d 160 (2d Cir. 1989) | 8 | +| No. 16 Civ. 4897 (AT), 2017 WL 2258374 (S.D.N.Y. May 22, 2017) Heandon v. Graham, | 2 | +| 767 So. 2d 1179 (Sup. Ct. FIa. 2000) | 5 | + +- v. Gov't Emples. Ret. Sys., 1118/1992, 1993 V.I. LEXIS 23 (Feb. 22, 1993) 7 Hunter v. Palisades Acquisition XVI, No. 16 Civ. 8779 (ER), 2017 WL 5513636 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 16, 2017) ....................................2 James v. Powell, 19 N.Y.2d 249 (1967) 8 Jaramillo v. Providence Wash. Ins. Co., 117 N.M. 337 (N.M. 1994). .9 +- v. Hess Oil, 867 F.2d 179 (3d Cir. 1989) 7 Crabtree a rel. Kemp v. Estate of Crabtree, 837 N.E.2d 135 (Ind. 2005) 9 +- v. Car Rentals, Inc., 29 A.D.3d 205 (2d Dep't 2006) 8 In re Merrill Auction Rate Sec. Litig., 851 F. Supp. 2d 512 (S.D.N.Y. 2012) 3 Nash v. Coram Healthcare Corp., No. 96-cv-0298 (LMM), 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9101 (S.D.N.Y. June 27, 1996) 3 Nat'l Jewish Democratic Council v. Adelson, No. 18 Civ. 8787 (JPO), 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 168675 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 10. 2019) 8 Okyere v. Palisades Collection, LLC, 961 F. Supp. 2d 522 (S.D.N.Y. 2013) 2 Orietview Techs, LLC v. Seven For All Mankind, LLC, No. 13-ev-0538 (PAE), 2013 WL 4016302 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 7, 2013) ......................................3 Range v. 535 Broadway Grp. LLC, No. 17 Civ. 0423 (WHP), 2019 WL 4182966 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 3, 2019) 2 + - v. V.L Haus. Auth., 57 V.I. 256 (U.S.V.I. Sup. Ct. 2012) 6, 7 + - v. Boy Scouts of Am., Inc., 65 N.Y.2d 189 (1985) 8 + +Stenberg v. Carhart, 530 U.S. 914, 120 S. Ct. 2597 (2000) 9 + +Underwood v. Roswell Park Cancer Inst., No. 15 Civ. 684 (FPG), 2017 WL 131740 (W.D.N.Y. Jan. 13, 2017) 1, 2 + +In re Venie, 2017-NMSC-018, 395 P.3d 516 (Sup. Ct. N.M. 2017) 4 + +Weyant v. Phia Grp. LLP, No. 17-cv-8230 (LGS), 2018 WL 4387557 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 13, 2018) 2 + +William A. Gross Construction Assocs. v. American Manufacturers Mutual Ins., 600 F. Supp. 2d 587 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) 1, 2 + +Willman v. Zelman & Assocs., LLC, No. 11-cv-1216 (KBF), 2012 WL 811512 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 12, 2012) 2 + +Zimmelman v. Teachers' Ret. Sys., No. 08-cv-6958 (DAB) (DF), 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29791 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 8, 2010) 1 + +## Statutes + +E.P.T.L. § 11-3.2(a)(1) 7 + +Fla. Stat. Ann. § 95.11(7) 5, 6 + +N.M. Stat. § 37-1-30(A)(2) 4 + +N.Y. Penal Law § 130 3 + +CPLR § 202 3 + +## Other Authorities + +C. & A. 5C Fed. Prac. & Proc. Civ. § 1380 (3d ed.) 1 + +Alec A. Beech, COMMENT: Adding Insult to Death: Why Punitive Damages Should Not Be Imposed Against a Deceased Tortfeasor's Estate in Ohio, 49 Akron L. Rev. 553, 564 (2016) 9 + +Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) 1 + +Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 12(t) 3 + +The Co-Executors' submit this Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of their Motion, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), to dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF No. 1). + +### ARGUMENT + +### I. This motion is procedurally proper and ripe, regardless of its title + +In her opposition brief, Plaintiff argues that this motion should be denied because it is procedurally improper. Plaintiff is wrong. "[T]he technical name given to a motion challenging a pleading is of little importance." See C. & A. 5C Fed. Prac. & Proc. Civ. § 1380 (3d ed.). The Second Circuit has expressly found: "Where the dates in a complaint show that an action is barred by a statute of limitations, a defendant may raise the affirmative defense in a preanswer motion to dismiss." Ghartey v. St. John's Queens Hosp., 869 F.2d 160, 162 (2d Cir. 1989) (citations omitted). See also Zimmelman v. Teachers' Ret. Sys., No. 08-cv-6958 (DAB) (DF), 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29791, at \*16-17, (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 8, 2010) (Freeman, M.J.), approved by, adopted by, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 29783 (Mar. 26, 2010) ("a motion to dismiss on the basis that a plaintiff failed to file a timely administrative charge is analyzed under [Rule] 12(6)(6)1 (citations omitted)). + +Plaintiff, citing William A. Gross Construction Assocs. v. American Manufacturers Mutual Ins., 600 F. Supp. 2d 587, 590 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) and Underwood v. Roswell Park Cancer Inst., No. 15 Civ. 684 (FPO), 2017 WL 131740, at \*11 n.8 (W.D.N.Y. Jan. 13, 2017), argues that the Court should not dismiss her time-barred claims because "the scope of discovery would remain the same." (Op. Br. p. 4.)2 However, those cases are factually distinguishable. + +William was a construction defects and delay lawsuit in which the court found that, because + +' Capitalized terms not defined herein have the meanings given to them in the Co-Executors' moving brief (ECF No. 27). + +2 ECF. No. 32. + +the issue of liability would need to be resolved regardless of ancillary motions to dismiss (e.g., to dismiss indemnification claims), it made sense to let such claims proceed and revisit them after discovery. Id. at 590. By contrast, here, it would make no sense to permit Plaintiff to prosecute claims that her own allegations establish are time-barred. + +Underwood was a Title VII lawsuit in which the court declined to dismiss claims on statute of limitations grounds because that issue depended on whether each alleged discriminatory action was a discrete, unlawful practice, an issue of fact which necessarily depended on the "specific nature" and surrounding circumstances of such actions. Id. at 31. Here, the issue is whether Plaintiff can demonstrate she was unable to discover the alleged abuse for years. She cannot because she alleges the opposite: she knew about the abuse when it allegedly happened to her. + +As explained in the Co-Executors' moving brief, courts in this District also regularly grant motions to dismiss legally deficient claims for punitive damages. (Mov. Br. pp. 4-5.) Plaintiff's retort that such cases are "cherry-picked" (Op. Br. p. 4) is unconvincing. Plaintiff's suggestion that Judges Batts, Buchwald, and Kaplan, among others, misapplied the law, is not credible. + +None of the cases cited by Plaintiff to argue otherwise involves a plaintiff impermissibly claiming punitive damages in a personal injury lawsuit against a deceased tortfeasor's estate in direct contravention of applicable law.3 As opposed to those cases, here there are no, and will + +3 See Range v. 535 Broadway Gip. LLC, No. 17 Civ. 0423 (WHP), 2019 WL 4182966, at '7 n.4 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 3, 2019) (ADA action); Hunter v. Palisades Acquisition XVI, No. 16 Civ. 8779 (ER), 2017 WL 5513636 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 16, 2017) (FDCPA action); Farina v. Metro. Transp. Auth., No. 18-cv-1433 (PKC), 2019 WL 3966163 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 21, 2019) (putative class action related to E-Z Pass cashless tolling); Weyant v. Phia Grp. LLP, No. 17-cv-8230 (LGS), 2018 WL 4387557 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 13, 2018) (putative class action against health plan administrator and agent); Grimes-Jenkins v. Conseil. Edison Co. of New York, No. 16 Civ. 4897 (AT) (JCF), 2017 WL 2258374 (S.D.N.Y. May 22, 2017), report and recommendation adopted by, 2017 WL 2709747 (S.D.N.Y. June 22, 2017) (antidiscrimination lawsuit); Okyere it Palisades Collection, LLC, 961 F. Supp. 2d 522, 536 (S.D.N.Y. 2013) (FDCPA lawsuit); Doe v. Montefiore Med. No. Cir., 12-cv-686 (CM), 2013 WL 624688 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 19, 2013) (negligence and breach of fiduciary duty action); Willman v. Zelman & Assocs., LLC, No. 11-cv- 1216 (KBF), 2012 WL 811 512, at \*5 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 12, 2012) (age discrimination lawsuit); Allied Irish Banks, P.L.C. v. Bank of Am., N.A., No. 03 cv-3748 (DAB), 2006 WL 278138, at \*15 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 2, 2006 commercial lawsuit); Denton v. McKee, 332 F. Supp. 2d 659, 667 (S.D.N.Y. 2004) (First Amendment lawsuit); v. 926 F. Supp. 399, 405 (S.D.N.Y. 1996) (personal injury action ti against tortfeasor's estate). + +never be any, facts entitling Plaintiff to punitive damages. (See Op. Br. pp. 4-6.) Therefore, unlike in those actions, here there is no reason to permit the punitive damages claim to stand. + +Even if the Court were to treat this motion as one to strike pursuant to Rule 12(0, it should still be granted. Courts in this District routinely grant motions to strike punitive damages including at the pleadings stage. See, e.g., In re Merrill Auction Rate Sec. Litig., 851 F. Supp. 2d 512, 544 (S.D.N.Y. 2012) (granting defendant's motion to strike sections of complaint asserting punitive damages); Cerveceria Modelo, S.A. de C.V. v. USPA Accessories LLC, No. 07-cv-7998 (HB), 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28999, at \*21-22 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 10, 2008) ("Because Defendant has failed to allege that Plaintiffs conduct was egregious and directed at the public generally, its claim for punitive damages cannot proceed."); Nash v. Coram Healthcare Corp., No. 96-cv-0298 (LMM), 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9101, at \*15 (S.D.N.Y. June 27, 1996) (granting motion to strike punitive damages prayer from the Complaint). + +Citing Burrell v. State Farm & Cas. Co., 226 F. Supp. 2d 427 (S.D.N.Y 2002), and Orietview Techs, LLC v. Seven For All Mankind, LLC, No. 13-cv-0538 (PAE), 2013 WL 4016302 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 7, 2013), Plaintiff argues that, even if this motion is deemed one to strike, it should be denied. (Op. Br. p. 4.) However, those cases are factually distinguishable. In Burrell, homeowners sued an insurer and others alleging Fair Housing Act and RICO violations. 226 F. Supp. 2d at 431. Orietview was a patent infringement lawsuit. 2013 WL 4016302, at \*1-2. Such actions have no bearing on this personal injury action against a deceased tortfeasor's estate. + +#### II. Plaintiff invokes inapplicable limitations statutes and tolling principles + +As an initial matter, Plaintiff ignores that, under CPLR § 202, her Complaint must be timely under New York law and the law of the jurisdictions where the alleged torts occurred. Plaintiff's arguments in her opposition brief about why her claims are timely under Florida, N.M. and USVI law fail to address that her claims are still untimely under N.Y. law. (Mov. Br. p. 3.)4 + +In her opposition brief, Plaintiff argues her claims based on alleged abuse occurring in N.M. are timely because she has yet to disclose it to a licensed medical or mental health care provider, which would trigger the limitations period under N.M. Stat. § 37-1-30(A)(2). Plaintiff is wrong for at least two reasons. + +First, because her cause of action expired long before the current version of N.M. Stat. § 37-1-30(A)(2) became effective on April 6, 2017, Plaintiff is not entitled to avail herself of it. See In re Venie, 2017-NMSC-018, 395 P.3d 516 (Sup. Ct. N.M. 2017) (distinguishing cases such as this, in which a cause of action expires before the enactment of a new limitations period, from cases in which a new limitations period extends the time to bring a cause of action before the prior limitations period had expired such that a defendant has no vested right in the statute of limitations defense based on the prior limitations period)? Rather, Plaintiff is only entitled to invoke the prior version of N.M. Stat. § 37-1-30(AX2), which provides that an action for damages based on personal injury caused by childhood sexual abuse must be commenced "three years from the date of the time that a person knew or had reason to know of the childhood sexual abuse and that the childhood sexual abuse resulted in an injury to the person, as established by competent medical or psychological testimony." Plaintiff's Complaint establishes she knew she was abused and injured in 2002. (Comp1.11 42-45.) Therefore, her claims expired 15 years ago. + +Second, even assuming the current version of N.M. Stat. § 37-1-30(A)(2) applies — which + +One of the N.Y. CVA predicates is a NY Penal Law § 130 offense. Plaintiff's alleged torts occurring outside New York do not qualify. See I Kamins, Mohler, & Shapiro, New York Criminal Practice, Second Ed., § 2.07 (Matthew Bender) ("It is axiomatic that the prosecution of a criminal action must rely on a necessary nexus between the alleged crime and the geographic jurisdiction of the court.") + +Accordingly, the N.M. Court of Appeals previously held that a statutory amendment to § 37-1-30 applied where the amendment was enacted before the original limitations period expired. See Grygonviez v. Trujillo, 2006 NMCA 89 (N.M. Ct. App. June 13, 2006). + +it does not — Plaintiff concedes she has failed to disclose her alleged abuse to a licensed medical or mental health care provider, which is a necessary condition precedent to its application. (See Op. Br. 6.) Plaintiff's claim based on New Mexico law must be dismissed on that basis alone. + +Plaintiff next argues her claims have not run under Fla. Stat. Ann. § 95.11(7) because she has "not yet discovered `the causal relationship between the injury and the abuse.' (Op. Br. 7 (citing Fla. Stat. Ann. § 95.11(7).) Plaintiff is wrong about this as well. Fla. Stat. Ann. § 95.11(7) only applies where a plaintiff alleges she was unable to discover her abuse and its effects, such as due to memory loss or a lack of access to records. See v. Monahan, 832 So. 2d 708, 710 (Sup. Ct. Fl. 2002) ("In Hearndon, we applied the delayed discovery doctrine to the plaintiff's cause of action ... for injuries resulting from childhood sexual abuse.... Although the Legislature did not specifically provide for delayed accrual, we reasoned that in the narrow circumstance of lack of memory in childhood sexual abuse cases, the doctrine was appropriate because the lack of memory was caused by the abuser." (citing Hearndon v. Graham, 767 So. 2d 1179 (Sup. Ct. Fla. 2000)). Plaintiff makes no such allegations. + +Omar ex reL Cannon v. Lindsey, 243 F. Supp. 2d 1339, 1347 (M.D. Fla.), aff'd, 334 F.3d 1246 (1 1 th Cir. 2003), which Plaintiff cites in support of her invocation of Fla. Stat. Ann. § 95.11(7), confirms it is inapplicable to this action. In Omar, a minor (at the time of the alleged torts and lawsuit) =child who was under the care of the Florida Department of Children and Families ("DCAF") since he was two years old alleged that, until DCAF produced his records to him in 2001, he had no meaningful opportunity to discovery who was responsible for abuse he had suffered. See Omar, No. 02-cv-01063, Compl. (ECF No. 18) at ¶¶ 4, 177-179 (Oct. 15, 2002). Here, Plaintiff alleges she knew exactly who abused her when she was 17 and into adulthood and that she suffered from such abuse including when it occurred. + +Plaintiff's ambiguous allegation intended to plead around the statute of limitations — that she is lust beginning to process" the "full extent" of her injuries caused by Decedent due to abuse occurring over 15 years ago including when she was an adult — is not a basis to invoke Fla. Stat. Ann. § 95.11(7), which is intended to protect victims of childhood sex abuse who are unable to discern and thus assert their legal claims. Plaintiff cites no legal authority establishing otherwise. + +Nor is Plaintiff's "full extent" allegation a basis to invoke the USVI "discovery rule." "[T]he present case is not one of those exceptional cases where the injury or its cause was not immediately known to the victim, as is required for application of the `discovery rule' to the statute of limitations." v. V.I. Hous. Auth., 57 V.I. 256, 298 (U.S.V.I. Sup. Ct. 2012) (Swan, A.J., concurring). The USVI Supreme Court has recognized this issue may be decided on the pleadings. Id. at 272. + +In the plaintiff argued that the trial court had erred in granting a motion to dismiss based on statute of limitations grounds because the "environmental discovery rule" — a claimspecific counterpart of the general discovery rule invoked by Plaintiff here — applied. Id. at 272. + +The Supreme Court held the discovery rule did not toll the statute of limitations, finding: + +The discovery rule is not applicable ... In her complaint, asserts that she witnessed Stanley open a bucket of Red Hot Sewer Solvent and pour its contents into a sewer pipe outside her home. further claims that upon inhaling the fumes from the sewer solvent her eyes, nose and throat began to burn; she started vomitl.nd she sustained physical injuries. Based on her own assertions, was both aware of her alleged injures and their cause on the date they occurred, October 23, 2001. + +Id. at 273 (emphasis added). + +In this action, Plaintiff alleges that: Decedent sexually abused her and destroyed her life (Comp1.11114-7); that "[w]hen [Decedent] inflicted these sexual assaults on [her] ... her body froze up, and she began crying" (id. ¶ 53); that, "[b]y 2004, [she] felt despair and isolation"; and that, after Decedent "cast her our' in 2004, she "sank into alcoholism and other self-harm" (id. ¶ 63). Accordingly, much like the plaintiff in Plaintiff's own allegations establish that she was "aware of her alleged injuries and their cause" long before she filed this lawsuit. + +The cases Plaintiff cites to support her invocation of the discovery rule confirm it only applies where, unlike here, a plaintiff is unable to pursue her claims until a belated fact discovery. See v. Hess Oil, 867 F.2d 179, 182 (3d Cir. 1989) (issue was when plaintiff knew he had become sick because of asbestos exposure); ■ **v. Gov't** Emples. Ret. Sys., 1118/1992, 1993 V.I. LEXIS 23, at \*1 (Feb. 22, 1993) (issue was when plaintiff knew of the permanency or her physical disability following automobile accident for purposes of applying for disability benefits). + +### III. Plaintiff disregards black-letter law establishing punitive damages are barred here. + +Plaintiff does not argue that Florida, N.M. or N.Y. law permits her claim for punitive damages. Therefore, should the Court find the laws of those jurisdictions apply, this motion should be granted. + +Nor does Plaintiff cite any legal authority justifying a departure from the black-letter choice-of-law principle holding that the law of the place of an alleged tort applies to issues regarding punitive damages, which are conduct regulating. (Mov. Br. p. 5.) Plaintiff's central premise used to gin up a (feeble) connection to the USV1 is that Decedent "purposefully availed himself of the benefits of USVI estate law." (Op. Br. at p. 11.) Plaintiff's assertion is based on newspaper articles and other non-binding sources that do not overcome the fact that, per her Complaint, N.Y. has a much stronger connection to this lawsuit than the USVI: Plaintiff chose to sue here (which is only possible pursuant to the same N.Y. statute that prohibits punitive damages against a deceased tortfeasor's estate);6 Plaintiff alleges N.Y. "was the epicenter" of Decedent's + +6Plaintiff largely ignores Nissen v. Eisensmidt, 940 F. Supp. 449,457 (N.D.N.Y. 1996). That is because it establishes + +wrongdoing (Compl. ¶ 23); and Plaintiff alleges Decedent resided in N.Y. during a "substantial portion" of the time relevant to this lawsuit, resided in N.Y. when he died, conducted "substantial" business operations in N.Y., and owned or controlled "numerous companies" with a principal place of business in N.Y. as well as real property here (id. ¶1 18-27). + +The USVI has no interest in applying its laws on punitive damages, which in any event are the same as Florida, N.M. and N.Y., to alleged torts that took place in those locations. The fact that Decedent's estate is being probated in the USVI 16 years after the alleged tortious conduct took place is a connection much weaker than the one deemed "tenuous" in Nat'! Jewish Democratic Council v. Adelson, No. 18 Civ. 8787 (JPO), 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 168675, (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 30, 2019), on which Plaintiff heavily relies. Even under the framework of Adelson, Florida, N.M. and N.Y., not the USVI, have the greater interests in applying their laws to torts that allegedly occurred there. + +Plaintiff's reliance on Adelson is based on an apparent misinterpretation of that action. In Adelson, the National Jewish Democratic Council and its chair sued Sheldon G. Adelson for damages based on Adelson's prior filing of a defamation suit against them in the same court pursuant to Nevada law. Id. at \*1-2. The court had dismissed Adelson's prior action pursuant to Nevada's anti-SLAPP statute, which has its own punitive damages provision. Id. at •1-2, 11. In the action against Adelson, the court held that Nevada had a much stronger interest in applying its punitive damages law because Adelson had previously attempted to use Nevada's defamation law to chill First Amendment rights. Id. at •14. By contrast, "New York's interest [was] relatively attenuated" in the second action because "[i]ts sole connection to this suit [was] that the suit was + +Plaintiff may not have the Court simultaneously apply the first sentence of E.P.T.L. § I I -3.2(aX I), permitting her to bring this case in the first place, but to disregard the very next sentence precluding punitive damages. See id. at 457. + +filed here." Id. at \*15. Here, the situation is the opposite given the strong N.Y. contacts stated above. Other cases Plaintiff cites are distinguishable or support the Co-Executors' argument.' + +### a. Plaintiff's Banks analysis and supporting arguments are erroneous. + +Plaintiff's response to the Co-Executors' Banks analysis is that "USVI case law makes clear that the USVI permits punitive damages against any defendant 'for conduct that is outrageous, because of the defendant's evil motive or his reckless indifference to the rights of others.' (Op. Br. p. 13.) Plaintiff misses the point. The issue here is not whether the USVI permits punitive damages generally. Rather, the issue is whether a proper Banks analysis shows the USVI adopts the majority position by precluding the recovery of punitive damages against a deceased tortfeasor's estate. As established in the Co-Executors' moving brief, every Banks factor favors the estate on this question. (Mov. Br. pp. 7-8.) + +Plaintiff's arguments against the Co-Executors' Banks analysis are erroneous. First Plaintiff argues that, unless a jurisdiction enacts a statutory prohibition on punitive damages against a tortfeasor's estate, this Court should find the jurisdiction does not have such a prohibition. Plaintiff is wrong. Many jurisdictions among the majority have judicially adopted the prohibition. See Alec A. Beech, COMMENT: Adding Insult to Death: Why Punitive Damages Should Not Be Imposed Against a Deceased Tortfeasor's Estate in Ohio, 49 Akron L. Rev. 553, 564 (2016) (thirteen states and D.C. have judicially adopted the majority view). + +Second, Plaintiff contends that the USVI A.G.'s request for punitive damages in a lawsuit against Decedent's estate means the third Banks factor weighs in Plaintiff's favor. However, even + +7 See James v. Powell, 19 N.Y.2d 249, 259-60 (1967) (applying N.Y. law to punitive damages against party who sought to prevent collection of N.Y. judgment because N.Y. had strongest interest in protecting its judgment creditors); Fed. MOUS. Fin. Agency v. Ally Fin. Inc., No. I I -cv-7010 (DLC), 2012 WL 6616061, at \*5 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 19, 2012) ("It can hardly be disputed that .Y.] and Minnesota, within whose borders the primary conduct allegedly took place, have a stronger interest"); v. Car Rentals. Inc., 29 A.D.3d 205, 212 (2d Dep't 2006) (applying N.J. law in car accident case because the vehicle was owned by a N.J. domiciliary and registered, insured and rented there); v. Boy Scouts of Am., Inc., 65 N.Y.2d 189, 195 (1985) (N.J. law applied to injuries "inflicted" there). + +where an attorney general purports to interpret a law — and here the USVI AG did no such thing - — the Supreme Court has warned against accepting such interpretation as authoritative. See Stenberg v. Carhart, 530 U.S. 914, 940, 120 S. Ct. 2597, 2614 (2000) ("[O]ur precedent warns against accepting as 'authoritative' an Attorney General's interpretation of state law."). + +Third Plaintiff argues the availability of punitive damages in this action would further the USVI's rationales for awarding punitive damages - i.e., to punish wrongdoers and for deterrence. Yet, a majority of jurisdictions have already deemed that rationale inapplicable after the tortfeasor dies. See, e.g., Jaramillo v. Providence Wash. Ins. Co., 117 N.M. 337, 346 (N.M. 1994) ("punishment and deterrence are not accomplished by enabling recovery of punitive damages from the estate of deceased tortfeasors"). + +Fourth, Plaintiff contends there are no "innocent heirs" in this matter. However, this argument is based on pure speculation and otherwise unsupported by any legal authority. + +Fifth, Plaintiff asks the Court to create new law by holding Decedent's suicide was an attempt to avoid punitive damages and, therefore, punitive damages should be permitted. This is also speculation. Moreover, the only legal authority Plaintiff cites to support this argument is dicta from an Indiana state law case in which that state joined the majority of jurisdictions holding that "Indiana law does not permit recovery of punitive damages from the estate of a deceased tortfeasor." Crabtree ex reL. Kemp v. Estate of Crabtree, 837 N.E.2d 135, 139 (Ind. 2005). + +# CONCLUSION + +For the reasons stated above and in their moving brief, the Co-Executors respectfully request that the Court dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint with prejudice to the extent it is time-barred and Plaintiff's claim for punitive damages, together with such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper. + +Dated: New York, New York April 7, 2020 + +By: /s/ Bennet I Moskowitz Bennet J. Moskowitz TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP 875 Third Avenue New York, New York 10022 + +Attorney for Defendants \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737373/EFTA02737373.metadata.json b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737373/EFTA02737373.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4f9353fa0890fc87fc35f0076fba1a505c602500 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737373/EFTA02737373.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,909 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737373.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 16, + "chars": 29321, + "elapsed_seconds": 2.22, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 192.78000000000003, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 418.4738464355469, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 418.4738464355469, + 100.10302734375 + ], + [ + 192.78000000000003, + 100.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DEFENDANTS' REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT \nOF THEIR MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 126.072, + 315.09000000000003 + ], + [ + 485.69183349609375, + 315.09000000000003 + ], + [ + 485.69183349609375, + 344.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 126.072, + 344.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "TABLE OF CONTENTS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 239.29200000000003, + 52.650000000000006 + ], + [ + 374.134521484375, + 52.650000000000006 + ], + [ + 374.134521484375, + 68.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 239.29200000000003, + 68.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "TABLE OF AUTHORITIES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 229.5, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 383.5578918457031, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 383.5578918457031, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 229.5, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Statutes", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 117.14466857910156, + 362.07 + ], + [ + 117.14466857910156, + 377.60302734375 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 377.60302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Other Authorities", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 516.78 + ], + [ + 167.29054260253906, + 516.78 + ], + [ + 167.29054260253906, + 532.10302734375 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 532.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ARGUMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 126.35999999999999 + ], + [ + 344.61444091796875, + 126.35999999999999 + ], + [ + 344.61444091796875, + 141.363037109375 + ], + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 141.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "I. This motion is procedurally proper and ripe, regardless of its title", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 152.28 + ], + [ + 446.7498474121094, + 152.28 + ], + [ + 446.7498474121094, + 167.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 167.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "II. Plaintiff invokes inapplicable limitations statutes and tolling principles", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.156, + 595.3499999999999 + ], + [ + 473.0101318359375, + 595.3499999999999 + ], + [ + 473.0101318359375, + 610.1835174560547 + ], + [ + 69.156, + 610.1835174560547 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "III. Plaintiff disregards black-letter law establishing punitive damages are barred here.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 537.2361450195312, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 537.2361450195312, + 334.1835632324219 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 334.1835632324219 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "a. Plaintiff's Banks analysis and supporting arguments are erroneous.", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 126.35999999999999 + ], + [ + 492.39483642578125, + 126.35999999999999 + ], + [ + 492.39483642578125, + 141.363037109375 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 141.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CONCLUSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 567.0 + ], + [ + 350.49066162109375, + 567.0 + ], + [ + 350.49066162109375, + 583.1835174560547 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 583.1835174560547 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 35 + ], + [ + "Line", + 18 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 27 + ], + [ + "Line", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "TableOfContents", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "TableOfContents", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 69 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 20 + ], + [ + "Line", + 10 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737373" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737389/EFTA02737389.md b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737389/EFTA02737389.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8327164e4fb6d101e3d8a29017567d82dff33f8d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737389/EFTA02737389.md @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ +April 8, 2020 + +**By ECF** + +Hon. Debra Freeman + +U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York + +Daniel [REDACTED] Moynihan + +United States Courthouse + +500 Pearl St. + +New York, NY 10007-1312 + +Re: [REDACTED] *v. Indyke et al.*, 19-cv-10788 (GHW)(DCF) + +Your Honor: + +We represent Plaintiff [REDACTED]. We write regarding Defendants' pending motion to dismiss (ECF 26) to ask the Court to disregard a new legal argument that Defendants have improperly raised for the first time in their reply brief (ECF 34). + +In their motion, Defendants contend, *inter alia*, that Plaintiff's claims arising from sexual assaults inflicted on her by Jeffrey Epstein in New Mexico when she was seventeen years old are time-barred under New Mexico law. Defs.' MOL in Support of Motion (ECF 27) at 4. In their moving brief, Defendants correctly identified the applicable New Mexico law governing statutes of limitations in childhood sexual abuse cases such as this one: + +Plaintiff's claims based on alleged torts occurring outside New York also expired long ago under the laws of those jurisdictions, including non-New York torts that occurred while she was a minor (if any), as follows: . . . (New Mexico) for torts occurring while she was a minor, the later of the "first instant" of Plaintiff's 24th birthday (i.e., sometime in 2009) or *3 years from the date that Plaintiff first disclosed her childhood sexual abuse to a licensed medical or mental health care provider in the context of receiving health care* (*N.M. Stat. § 37-1-30*) (Plaintiff alleges she never made such a disclosure (Compl. ¶ 67)); and, after Plaintiff reached age of majority, 3 years (i.e., in 2006) (*N.M. Stat. § 37-1-8*) . . . . + +*Id.* at 3-4 (emphasis added). Plaintiff agrees that this is the governing legal standard under New Mexico law, and that her claim is timely if brought within + +three years from the date that she “first disclose[s] the person’s childhood sexual abuse to a licensed medical or mental health provider in the context of receiving health care from the provider.” Plaintiff’s MOL in Opposition (ECF 32) at 6 (quoting N.M. Stat. § 37-1-30(A)(2)). + +Notwithstanding the parties’ agreement on the applicable legal standard governing the timeliness of Plaintiff’s New Mexico claims, Defendants’ reply brief attempts for the first time to suggest that a different legal standard applies. Even though Defendants cited New Mexico Statutes § 37-1-30 in their opening brief and correctly stated that under that the statute the limitations period does not begin to run until “Plaintiff first disclosed her childhood sexual abuse to a licensed medical or mental health care provider in the context of receiving health care,” Defendants now contend for the first time on reply that “Plaintiff is not entitled to avail herself” of that standard, and that the Court must apply an older version of that statute. Defs.’ Reply MOL (ECF 34) at 9. + +It is well established that “arguments raised for the first time in a reply brief are waived.” *Cottam v. Global Emerging Capital Group, LLC*, No. 16 Civ. 4584 (LGS), 2020 WL 1528526, at \*14 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 30, 2020); *RL 900 Park LLC v. Ender*, No. 18 Civ. 12121 (AT), 2020 WL 70920, at \*4 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 3, 2020); [REDACTED] v. *United States*, No. 17 Civ. 1093 (WHP), 2019 WL 3408886, at \*2 n.2 (S.D.N.Y. July 29, 2019); *Centeno v. City of New York*, No. 16 Civ. 2393 (VSB), 2019 WL 1382093, at \*6 n.13 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 27, 2019); *Coscarelli v. ESquared Hosp. LLC*, 364 F. Supp. 3d 207, 219 n.10 (S.D.N.Y. 2019). Accordingly, the Court must ignore Defendants’ belated attempt to argue that a different legal standard applies. + +Even if Defendants had not plainly waived this new argument, and even if the pre-2017 version of New Mexico Statutes § 37-1-30 applied to Plaintiff’s claims, Defendants’ motion would still fail. Under the version of that statute that was in effect between 1995 and 2017, a claim is timely if brought before the latter of the plaintiff’s twenty-fourth birthday or “three years from the date of the time that a person knew or had reason to know of the childhood sexual abuse and that the childhood sexual abuse resulted in an injury to the person, as established by competent medical or psychological testimony.” *Kevin J. v. Sager*, 999 P.2d 1026, 1028 (N.M. App. 1999). In *Kevin J.*, for example, after discovery had been completed, the Court considered testimony from the plaintiff’s expert that, “even though Plaintiff had some cognitive understanding and realization of the abuse and its effect upon him prior to February 5, 1994, Plaintiff did not finally pull it all together and realize the impact that the abuse had on his life until after February 5, 1994,” and that “it’s a process that unfolds for people.” *Id.* at 1029; see also *id.* at 1027 (“Plaintiff does not claim that he repressed any memory of the alleged abuse.”). The court denied summary judgment was improper, holding that “[t]he question of when Plaintiff knew or had reason to know of the alleged abuse and its impact is a question for the jury to decide.” *Id.* at 1030. Here, Plaintiff has alleged that that she “is still in the nascent stages of understanding the deep and lasting + +injuries that Epstein's pattern of abuse has caused her," and that she "is still just beginning to process and understand the full extent of the injuries that Epstein's abuse had caused her and the connection between Epstein's abuse and the emotional and psychological injuries she had experienced." Complaint (ECF 1) ¶¶ 65, 68. Accordingly, even if the pre-2017 version of the New Mexico statute applied, Plaintiff has pleaded sufficient facts to allege that her claims are timely, and Defendants' cannot meet their burden of proving that Plaintiffs New Mexico claims are time-barred, particularly at this phase before fact and expert discovery have been conducted. + +The Court should ignore Defendants' new argument both because it was raised for the first time in reply and because it is in any event meritless. + +Respectfully submitted, + +/s/ Daniel Mullkoff + +Daniel Mullkoff + +cc: Bennet J. Moskowitz, Counsel for Defendants (by ECF) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737389/EFTA02737389.metadata.json b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737389/EFTA02737389.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..46ac50042d14fe26f5425fe1f926dd050aa23705 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737389/EFTA02737389.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,110 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737389.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 6148, + "elapsed_seconds": 10.88, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 28 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 33 + ], + [ + "Line", + 17 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737389" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737392/EFTA02737392.md b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737392/EFTA02737392.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0c9988e657026c05af461a8db7b1d313ae7980e6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737392/EFTA02737392.md @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@ +Bennet J. Moskowitz + +D: 212-704-6000 + +bennet.moskowitz@troulman.com + +April 10, 2020 + +## ELECTRONIC COURT FILING + +Hon. Debra Freeman + +Daniel Moynihan + +United States Courthouse + +500 Pearl Street + +New York, New York 10007-1312 + +Re: v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, as Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, 1:19-cv-10788 (GHW) (DCF) + +Dear Judge Freeman: + +We represent Defendants Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein to ether. the "Co-Executors"), in the above-referenced action. We write in response to Plaintiff ' ("Plaintiff") April 8, 2020 letter (ECF No. 35) seeking to strike an argument from the Co-Executors' reply brief in support of their motion to dismiss Plaintiff's claims based on torts that allegedly occurred over fifteen years ago. Plaintiffs counsel filed their letter, without first conferring with us, incorrectly claiming that the Co-Executors raised a new legal argument in their reply, and supplying new argument themselves, in a rushed attempt at a do-over following their failure to avoid the correct version of the statute of limitations applicable to Plaintiffs claims based on conduct that allegedly occurred in New Mexico in 2002. The Court should reject Plaintiffs request for at least five reasons. + +First, there is no "new" argument here. Plaintiffs counsel argues that the Co-Executors' reply brief "attempts for the first time to suggest that a different legal standard applies." (ECF No. 35 at 2.) That is wrong. The Co-Executors contended from the outset, and continue to contend, that Plaintiffs New Mexico claims are time-barred. The Co-Executors argued this in both their motion to dismiss and their reply. (ECF No. 27 at 4; ECF No. 34 at 4.) And Plaintiffs counsel concedes that the Co-Executors "correctly identified the applicable New Mexico law." (ECF No. 35 at 1). Plaintiff has thus been aware since day one that the Co-Executors are moving to dismiss her claims as time-barred and was apprised of the legal bases for that motion. + +Even where an argument in a party's reply brief is deemed an "extension" of an argument made in its moving brief, the argument is not "new." Niv v. Hilton Hotels Corp., 710 F. Supp. 2d 328, 338 n.4 (S.D.N.Y. 2008). In Niv, the court rejected plaintiffs letter request to disregard defendants' argument that Israel was an adequate alternative forum on the ground it + +was newly raised in defendants' reply. *Id.* The *Niv* court held that the argument was not new, as defendants' motion argued that New York was not an adequate forum, and thus the contention that Israel was an adequate forum was simply an extension of this argument. *Id.* + +There is also no unfair surprise1 warranting the Court's disregard of the Co-Executors' legal arguments. See *Ruggiero v. Warner-Lambert Co.*, 424 F.3d 249, 252 (2d Cir. 2005) (finding plaintiff could not claim she was "blind-sided" by defendants' reliance on a particular argument that was raised, albeit more generally, in defendants' moving papers). + +Second, even if an argument is deemed "new," where, as here, it is reasonable to expect that argument, it is not prejudicial for the Court to consider it. *Niv*, 710 F. Supp. 2d at 338 n.4 ("[E]ven if considered a new argument, the Court believes that it was reasonable to expect this argument and therefore it is not prejudicial to plaintiffs to consider those materials."). + +Third, even if the Co-Executors supplied a new argument in their reply brief—they did not—the Court has the discretion to and should consider it in the interest of justice. See *Am. Hotel Int'l Grp. Inc. v. OneBeacon Ins. Co.*, 611 F. Supp. 2d 373, 375 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) ("[T]he Second Circuit has made it abundantly clear that a district court has discretion to consider a belatedly-raised argument."); *Niv*, 710 F. Supp. 2d at 338 n.4 (holding a court may consider a new argument raised in reply where "in the interest of justice"). The correct version of the statute applicable to Plaintiff's New Mexico claims is a potentially dispositive legal issue this Court must determine. This Court should not be precluded from considering that version merely because Plaintiff failed to consider it. That is especially so where, as here, Plaintiff does not contend that she has been unfairly prejudiced or surprised. + +Fourth, Plaintiff's substantive argument—that, even under the correct version of the statute, her claims arising from alleged acts in New Mexico are timely—is incorrect. The applicable version of the statute of limitations required her to commence an action by the later of: (1) the first instant of the person's twenty-fourth birthday ("Prong One"); or (2) three years from the date of the time that a person knew or had reason to know of the childhood sexual abuse and that the childhood sexual abuse resulted in an injury to the person, **as established by competent medical or psychological testimony** ("Prong Two"). *Kevin J. v. Sager*, 2000-NMCA-012, ¶ 7, 128 N.M. 794, 796-97, 999 P.2d 1026, 1028-29 (citing the correct version of N.M. Stat. § 37-1-30, emphasis added). Plaintiff alleges in her Complaint that she "still has not disclosed her abuse to a licensed medical or mental health care provider in the context of receiving health care from that provider." (ECF No. 1 ¶ 67.) Because there **is no** date under Prong Two, Plaintiff must have filed her claims by the date established in Prong One. Because Plaintiff's Complaint establishes conclusively that she knew she was abused and injured in New Mexico in 2002, and that she turned twenty-four in 2009, her claims expired under Prong One **10 years ago**. (ECF No. 1 ¶¶ 34, 42-45.) + +Plaintiff's reliance on *Kevin J. v. Sager* is misplaced. In *Kevin J.*, plaintiff saw a licensed counselor who helped plaintiff understand the abuse he had suffered and established the date upon which this understanding occurred. 128 N.M. at 795. Here, Plaintiff concedes she has not seen a licensed medical or mental health care provider. + +1 Plaintiff does not claim she was surprised or unfairly prejudiced by the so-called "new argument." + +![](_page_2_Picture_13.jpeg) + +Fifth, Plaintiff continues to ignore that, under New York's borrowing statute, CPLR § 202, which is applicable to federal diversity actions such as this,2 her claim must be timely under the statute of limitations of **both** New York **and** the jurisdiction where the claim accrued. Thus, even if Plaintiff's claims were timely under New Mexico law—they are not—they still fail because they are untimely under New York law. At the time Plaintiff was allegedly sexually assaulted in 2002, New York's statute of limitations required a plaintiff sexually assaulted as a minor to file her cause of action one year after reaching the age of 18. (CPLR 208; CPLR 215(c).) According to the Complaint, Plaintiff turned 18 sometime in 2003. Accordingly, her claims for alleged torts occurring in New Mexico while she was a minor expired in 2004.3 + +In sum, Plaintiff has not demonstrated that the Co-Executors rely on a new argument in their reply and concedes the Co-Executors have always argued that Plaintiff's New Mexico claims were untimely under N.M. Stat. § 37-1-30. Nor has Plaintiff established any unfair prejudice or surprise warranting disregard of the Co-Executors' legal arguments. Finally, Plaintiff is incorrect on the merits, as her claims are untimely. + +The real issue here is that Plaintiff failed to plead around the correct version of N.M. Stat § 37-1-30 in her Complaint or to address it in her opposition brief. The version she (erroneously) attempted to invoke is inapplicable to her claims because it became effective years after those claims expired. That Plaintiff missed this important legal issue and did not address the proper version of the statute in her Complaint or opposition brief is not a basis on which to disregard the Co-Executors' arguments, nor to permit Plaintiff to offer new argument by *de facto* sur-reply brief submitted without leave of the Court. The Court should reject Plaintiff's letter motion and grant the Co-Executors' motion to dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF. No. 27). + +Respectfully submitted, + +s/Bennet J. Moskowitz +Bennet J. Moskowitz + +--- + +2 "In diversity cases in New York, federal courts apply ... C.P.L.R. § 202." *Commerzbank AG v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Tr. Co.*, 234 F. Supp. 3d 462, 467 (S.D.N.Y. 2017) (citation omitted). + +3 Plaintiff's New Mexico claims were not revived by CPLR § 214-g, the "Child Victim's Act," as they do not state a claim for a violation of New York's Penal Law § 130, a necessary predicate for application of the Child Victim's Act. (Applying to claims for "injury or condition suffered as a result of conduct which would constitute a sexual offense as defined in article one hundred thirty of the penal law committed against a child less than eighteen years of age... .") \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737392/EFTA02737392.metadata.json b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737392/EFTA02737392.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..37baa7129092219d0a9f6db2a5152ec169db855b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737392/EFTA02737392.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,152 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737392.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 8968, + "elapsed_seconds": 12.58, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_2_Picture_13.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "ELECTRONIC COURT FILING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 213.790283203125 + ], + [ + 228.2239990234375, + 213.790283203125 + ], + [ + 228.2239990234375, + 227.18701171875 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 227.18701171875 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 90 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737392" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737392/_page_2_Picture_13.jpeg b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737392/_page_2_Picture_13.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..68e73f198136652031bb2463ad2cb379a2645d88 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737392/_page_2_Picture_13.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:2b3a3e364a8507bcb0d5d9b7ad23ebc0ff7e8f911b2adbd034e5f628dd859d8c +size 5043 diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737395/EFTA02737395.md b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737395/EFTA02737395.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e02ba8507050ef418ba2aa0838a79ba5bb93f4a3 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737395/EFTA02737395.md @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@ +Bennet J. Moskowitz D: 212-704-6000 bennet.moskowitz@troutman.corn + +April 13, 2020 + +## VIA ELECTRONIC COURT FILING + +Hon. Debra C. Freeman Daniel Moynihan United States Courthouse 500 Pearl Street New York, New York 10007 + +Re: Jane Doe 15, 1:19-cv-10653-PAE-DCF; Mary Doe, 1:19-cv-10758-PAE-DCF; 1.19-cv-10788-GHW-DCF + +Dear Judge Freeman: + +We represent Defendants Darren K. lndyke and Richard D. Kahn, Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (together, the to -Executors"), in the above-referenced actions commenced by Jane Doe 15, Mary Doe and IIM= -(together, "Plaintiffs," and together with the Co-Executors, the Parties"). In light of the ongoing pandemic and the various difficulties it has presented, we write with Plaintiffs' consent to request that the Court extend the remaining deadlines in the above-refenced actions, as set by this Court's Order dated February 11, 2020, by thirty (30) days, as follows: + +- the deadline for Plaintiffs to file any motions to amend the pleadings or to join any additional parties be extended from April 30, 2020 to June 1, 2020; +- the deadline for the Parties to submit joint status reports to the Court, regarding discovery and the progress of settlement discussions, be extended from April 30, 2020 to June 1, 2020; +- the deadline for the completion of fact discovery be extended from June 10, 2020 to July 10, 2020; +- the deadline for service of Plaintiffs' expert reports be extended from June 10, 2020 to July 10, 2020; +- the deadline for service of the Co-Executors' rebuttal reports be extended from July 10, 2020 to August 10, 2020; and + +- the deadline for the completion of expert discovery be extended from July 31, 2020 to August 31, 2020. + +This is the first request for an extension of these deadlines. + +Respectfully submitted, + +s/Bennet J. Moskowitz Bennet J. Moskowitz + +cc: Counsel of Record (via ECF) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737395/EFTA02737395.metadata.json b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737395/EFTA02737395.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..03be5427548abc1619555911fa88a2ad0b2c83cf --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737395/EFTA02737395.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,136 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737395.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1867, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.66, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "VIA ELECTRONIC COURT FILING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 213.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 249.2187957763672, + 213.03000000000003 + ], + [ + 249.2187957763672, + 227.18701171875 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 227.18701171875 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 84 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 24 + ], + [ + "Line", + 12 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737395" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737397/EFTA02737397.md b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737397/EFTA02737397.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cb4fb73266a4a9fad2f4d44c73aff51e2d7097ca --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737397/EFTA02737397.md @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@ +Bennet J. Moskowitz D: 212-704-6000 bennet.moskowitz©iroutman.com + +## VIA ELECTRONIC COURT FILING + +Hon. Debra C. Freeman Daniel Moynihan United States Courthouse 500 Pearl Street New York, New York 10007 + +## MEMORANDUM ENDORSED + +April 13, 2020 + +Re: Jane Doe 15, 1:19-cv-10653-PAE-DCF; Mary Doe, 1:19-cv-10758-PAE-DCF; 1.19-cv-10788-GHW-DCF + +Dear Judge Freeman: + +We represent Defendants Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (together, the to -Executors"), in the above-referenced actions commenced by Jane Doe 15, Mary Doe and (together, "Plaintiffs," and together with the Co-Executors, the Parties"). In light of the ongoing pandemic and the various difficulties it has presented, we write with Plaintiffs' consent to request that the Court extend the remaining deadlines in the above-refenced actions, as set by this Court's Order dated February 11, 2020, by thirty (30) days, as follows: + +- the deadline for Plaintiffs to file any motions to amend the pleadings or to join any additional parties be extended from April 30, 2020 to June 1, 2020; +- the deadline for the Parties to submit joint status reports to the Court, regarding discovery and the progress of settlement discussions, be extended from April 30, 2020 to June 1, 2020; +- the deadline for the completion of fact discovery be extended from June 10, 2020 to July 10, 2020; +- the deadline for service of Plaintiffs' expert reports be extended from June 10, 2020 to July 10, 2020; +- the deadline for service of the Co-Executors' rebuttal reports be extended from July 10, 2020 to August 10, 2020; and + +- the deadline for the completion of expert discovery be extended from July 31, 2020 to August 31, 2020. + +This is the first request for an extension of these deadlines. + +Respectfully submitted, + +s/Bennet J. Moskowitz Bennet J. Moskowitz + +cc: Counsel of Record (via ECF) + +April 14, 2020 SO ORDERED + +il.41-6€ DEBRA FREEMAN United States Magistrate Judge \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737397/EFTA02737397.metadata.json b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737397/EFTA02737397.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d926fbd12f55fc976fc7ff21b86621071dc9c5a7 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737397/EFTA02737397.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,159 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737397.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1966, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.71, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "VIA ELECTRONIC COURT FILING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 213.790283203125 + ], + [ + 249.2187957763672, + 213.790283203125 + ], + [ + 249.2187957763672, + 227.18701171875 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 227.18701171875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MEMORANDUM ENDORSED", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 338.43600000000004, + 130.6019287109375 + ], + [ + 529.03857421875, + 130.6019287109375 + ], + [ + 529.03857421875, + 149.14593505859375 + ], + [ + 338.43600000000004, + 149.14593505859375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 84 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 32 + ], + [ + "Line", + 16 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737397" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737399/EFTA02737399.md b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737399/EFTA02737399.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..333ea8b07c57708aa52176eee923e94b9f5be64a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737399/EFTA02737399.md @@ -0,0 +1,132 @@ +#### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK + +MARY DOE, + +Plaintiff, + +-v- + +DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, as Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, and I + +Defendants. + +19 Civ. 10758 (PAE) + +#### OPINION & ORDER + +PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge: + +In this diversity action, plaintiff Mary Doe' brings tort claims under New York law against, inter alia, Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, the executors of the estate of Jeffrey Epstein ("Indyke and Kahn" or "the executor defendants"). The executor defendants now move to dismiss Doe's claim against them for punitive damages, on the grounds that, as a matter of New York law, such damages are categorically unavailable in a personal injury action against the personal representative of an estate.2 For the reasons that follow, the Court grants that motion. + +## I. Background + +## A. Doe's Complaint + +Doe's Complaint, filed on November 20, 2019, alleges a horrific course of sexual and psychological abuse at Epstein's hands during 2004 and 2005. Cmplt. 71-15 (summary account); id. 11 38-106 (detailed account). It alleges that Doe came to the United States with her + +Doe has been granted leave to proceed pseudonymously. Dkt. 21. + +2 Doe also sues who is alleged to have served as Epstein's scheduler and assistant. See Dkt. 1 (Complaint, or "Cmplt.") ¶ 19. Doe's bid for punitive damages against is not implicated by this motion. + +parents as a young refugee from a war-tom country, and was working in pursuit of a promising career as a model when, in 2004, at age 16, she met Epstein through another model. Id. ¶ 2. + +Epstein made clear to Doe how important and powerful he was and promised to help her with her modeling career and college admissions. Id. ¶ 3. Doe, in turn, "believed she could trust him" and "that he could change her life." Id. ¶ 4. Epstein, however, "used his power over Mary to sexually abuse her, viciously and repeatedly." Id. ¶ 5. Aided by defendant Epstein's scheduler and assistant, Epstein "would summon Mary to his Manhattan townhouse, order her to give him massages, and then subject her to sexual acts, the severity of which increased over time." Id.; see also id. ¶ 19. The Complaint graphically chronicles Epstein's acts of sexual abuse in the townhouse, which included forcing Doe to perform oral sex on him and later raping her. Id. ¶¶ 7-9; 56-105. + +In late 2005, the Complaint alleges, Doe—as a result of an incident at the townhouse— "suddenly saw the truth: she was not even a human being to Epstein, she was an object," and Epstein was treating her as a prostitute, "one of many girls he treated as sexual objects." Id. ¶ 11. Doe had a breakdown, almost immediately thereafter left New York City, returned to her parents' home across the country, and never saw Epstein again. Id. ¶ 12. Epstein's abuse caused Doe to abandon her modeling career and left her humiliated, angry, and suicidal, with debilitating panic attacks and "dramatic psychological scars." Id. ¶¶ 13-14. Epstein's arrest in July 2019 gave Doe "briefl] hope that he might finally face consequences," but his death in August 2019 at a federal jail in Manhattan "left Mary with the desolate sense that he has evaded justice yet again." Id. ¶ 15. + +In this action, Doe brings claims, under New York law, of battery, id. ¶¶ 108-13, assault, id. ¶¶ 114-19, and the intentional infliction of emotional distress, id. ¶¶ 120-27, against Indyke + +and Kahn, solely in their capacities as executors of Epstein's estate, id.1 18, and against M, for her "integral role in operating Epstein's operation of sex trafficking Mary and other girls," id. 1 19. As its basis for personal jurisdiction over the executors, it alleges that "Epstein was subject to personal jurisdiction at the time of his death," id. 122, "because the tortious acts giving rise to Plaintiff's claims took place in New York State," id. 123. The Complaint seeks, in addition to compensatory damages and attorneys' fees and costs, "punitive damages in an amount to be determined at trial." Id. p. 19. + +## B. The Executors' Partial Motion to Dismiss + +On January 21, 2020, the executor defendants filed a partial motion to dismiss, Dkt. 17, and a supporting memorandum of law, Dkt. 18 ("Def. Mem."). It sought dismissal of the prayer for punitive damages on the ground that such damages cannot, as a matter of New York law, be sought against the personal representatives of an estate. On March 3, 2020, Doe filed a memorandum of law in opposition, Dkt. 28 ("Doe Opp'n"), and a supporting declaration by Daniel Mullkoff, Esq., Dkt. 29 ("Mullkoff Decl."), which attached Epstein's will. On March 20, 2020, the executor defendants filed a reply. Dkt. 33 ("Def. Reply"). + +# H. Applicable Legal Standards Under Rule 1.2(hX6) + +To survive a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6), a complaint must plead "enough facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face." Bell Ad. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007). A claim will only have "facial plausibility when the plaintiff pleads factual content that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged." Ashcroft v. lqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009). A complaint is properly dismissed where, as a matter of law, "the allegations in a complaint, however true, could not raise a claim of entitlement to relief." Twombly, 550 U.S. at 558. When resolving a motion to dismiss, the court must accept as true all well-pled factual allegations in the complaint and draw all reasonable inferences in the plaintiff's favor. Steginsky v. Xcelera Inc., 741 F.3d 365, 368 (2d Cir. 2014). That tenet, however, "is inapplicable to legal conclusions." lqbal, 556 U.S. at 678. Pleadings that offer only "labels and conclusions" or "a formulaic recitation of the elements of a cause of action will not do." Twombly, 550 U.S. at 555. + +#### HI. Discussion + +In moving to dismiss Doe's prayer for punitive damages against them, the executor defendants argue that New York law applies to this personal injury action and categorically prohibits an award of punitive damages against the personal representatives of an estate. Specifically, they note, § 11-3.2(a)(1) of New York's Estates, Powers and Trusts Law ("EPTL") provides: + +No cause of action for injury to person or property is lost because of the death of the person liable for the injury. For any injury, an action may be brought or continued against the personal representative of the decedent, but punitive damages shall not be awarded nor penalties adjudged in any such action brought to recover damages for personal injury. + +EPTL § I I-3.2(a)(1) (emphasis added). + +Applying this statute, courts have held punitive damages unavailable in personal injury actions against executors or administrators of estates. These include federal courts determining the damages available for constitutional-tort claims under New York law, see, e.g., Graham v. , 224 F.R.D. 59, 63 (N.D.N.Y. 2004) (precluding, based on EPTL § 11-3.2(a)(1), punitive damages claims in § 1983 action against estate administrators, and noting that New York law is "very clear" on this point); Blissett v. Eisensmidt, 940 F. Supp. 449, 457 (N.D.N.Y. 1996) (overturning, based on EPTL § 11-3.2(a)(1), jury's punitive damages award in § 1983 case against estate, and noting "strong policy against the assessment of punitive damages against an estate on account of wrongful conduct of the decedent"), and state courts in personal injury actions governed by New York law, see, e.g., v. Nathan, 352 N.Y.S.2d 464, 464 + +(1st Dep't. 1974) (affirming dismissal of punitive damages claim because, under EPTL § 11-3.2(a)(1), defendant's death precluded recovery of punitive damages from personal representatives of estate); cf. Flaunt v. Birnbaum, 582 N.Y.S.2d 853, 857 (4th Dep't. 1992) (affirming denial of punitive damages in case against deceased executor; citing EPTL § 11-3.2(a)(1) and the "strong policy against the assessment of punitive damages against an estate on account of the wrongful conduct of the decedent"). + +The law of a majority of states is in accord with EPTL § I I -3.2(a)(1), as reflected in the Restatement (Second) of Torts. See Restatement (Second) of Torts § 908 cmt. a (1979) ("Punitive damages are not awarded against the representatives of a deceased tortfeasor[.]"); see also Doe Opp'n at 12 (acknowledging that "a majority of states do not permit punitive damages against estates"). This majority rule aligns with "[t]he general rule under federal common law," that "an action survives the death of a party insofar as it is remedial[,] and not penal[,] in nature." See, e.g., Official Comm. of Unsecured Creditors of Exeter Holdings, Ltd. v. Haltman, No. 13 Civ. 5475 (JS) (AKT), 2017 WL 9485707, at \*7 (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 3, 2017) (collecting cases), report and recommendation adopted, 2017 WL 3981299 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 11, 2017). + +The justification commonly given for precluding punitive damage awards against estates is that punishment and deterrence—the recognized bases for imposing punitive damages on a tortfeasor—are not advanced by imposing punitive damages on his or her estate. As the New Mexico Supreme Court explained in adopting the majority rule: "[P]unishment and deterrence are not accomplished by enabling recovery of punitive damages from the estate of deceased tortfeasors"; "[w]hen the tortfeasor cannot be punished for his culpable behavior, punitive damages no longer have the desired effect and, therefore, the victim loses the legal entitlement to recover those damages." Jaramillo v. Providence Wash. Ins. Co., 871 P.2d 1343, 1351 (N.M. 1994) (canvassing laws of other states). + +Doe does not dispute that EPTL § 11-3.2(aX1) precludes punitive damages in a personal injury action under New York law. Instead, Doe makes three arguments: (1) that defendants' motion is premature, Doe Mem. at 4; (2) that defendants' motion is improperly styled as a motion to dismiss, id. at 3; and (3) that the law of the United States Virgin Islands ("USVI"), not New York law, applies, and permits punitive damages against an estate, id. at 4-13. + +Doe's first argument is quickly dispatched. Doe cites cases where courts have declined to resolve motions to dismiss aimed at prayers for relief, finding such motions premature. See id. at 4 (citations omitted). But a review of these cases reflects that the motions in those cases were not based on categorical preclusions of punitive damages. In contrast, where punitive damages have been unavailable as a matter of law, courts have not hesitated to dismiss prayers for such damages at the threshold. See. e.g., Murtha v. N.Y. State Gaming Comm 'n, No. 17 Civ. 10040 (NSR), 2019 WL 4450687, at \*19 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 17, 2019) (dismissing demand for punitive damages under the New York State Human Rights Law ("NYSHRL") because it "does not provide for punitive damages"); v. N.Y.C. Dep't of Educ., No. 18 Civ. 6670 (AT), 2019 WL 4039958, at \*9 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 27, 2019) (granting motion to dismiss demand for punitive damages under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act and the New York City Human Rights Law ("NYCHRL") where neither statute permitted a plaintiff to recover punitive damages); Talarico v. Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J., 367 F. Supp. 3d 161, 172 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) (dismissing demand for punitive damages against Port Authority where "the Third Circuit and the overwhelming majority of district courts within this Circuit have held that punitive damages are not available against" that defendant (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)); Canete + +v. Metro. Transp. Auth., No. 17 Civ. 3961 (PAE), 2018 WL 4538897, at \*9 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 20, 2018) (dismissing demand for punitive damages where such relief was "precluded as a matter of law"); Roman Catholic Diocese of Rockville Cm v. Gen. Reins. Corp., No. 16 Civ. 2063 (CM), 2016 WL 5793996, at \*6 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 23, 2016) ("In this case, the circumstances surrounding the denial of the insurance indemnification claim do not warrant the rare exception provided for punitive damages under a breach of contract claim. For this reason, the Court grants Defendant's motion to dismiss the punitive damages claim."); SIB ex reL Berkhout v. N.Y.C. Dep't of Educ., No. 03 Civ. 6653 (NRB), 2004 WL 1586500, at \*8 (S.D.N.Y. July 14, 2004) (dismissing punitive damages claim because such damages are unavailable in § 1983 actions against municipalities). Provided that New York law applies to this action, this case, too, involves a categorical preclusion of such damages, under EPTL § 11-3.2(a)(1), that can be adjudicated at the threshold. + +Doe's second argument is that the defendant-executors' challenge is improperly brought as a motion to dismiss. Doe Mem. at 3 & n.3. There is divided case authority on this point. Courts, including in the cases cited above, have granted motions to dismiss prayers for such relief. But others have declined to entertain such motions, stating that, "[b]ecause punitive damages are a form of damages, not an independent cause of action, a motion to dismiss a prayer for relief in the form of punitive damages is 'procedurally premature.' Farina v. Metro. Transp. Auth., 409 F. Supp. 3d 173, 220 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) (quoting Hunter v. Palisades Acquisition XVI, LLC, No. 16 Civ. 8779 (ER), 2017 WL 5513636, at \*9 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 16, 2017)); see also, e.g., Wiederman v. Spark Energy, Inc., No. 19 Civ. 4564 (PGG), 2020 WL 1862319, at \*9-10 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 14, 2020); v. City of New York, No. 18 Civ. 1937 (VSB), 2020 WL 1644009, at \*17 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 2, 2020); Range v. 535 Broadway Grp. LLC, No. 17 Civ. 423 (WHP), + +2019 WL 4182966, at \*7 n.4 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 16, 2017); Okyere v. Palisades Collection, LLC, 961 F. Supp. 2d 522, 536 (S.D.N.Y. 2013). + +The Court has no occasion to resolve this conceptual debate, because the executors' motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) alternatively can be treated as a motion to strike under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(f). See C. & A. =, 5C Federal Practice and Procedure § 1380 (3d ed.) ("[T]he technical name given to a motion challenging a pleading is of little importance inasmuch as prejudice to the nonmoving party hardly can result from treating a motion that has been inaccurately denominated a motion to strike as a motion to dismiss the complaint."). And under Rule 12(f), on a motion or sua sponte, a court may strike from a pleading an "insufficient defense or any redundant, immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous matter." Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f). Although motions to strike under Rule 12(f) are generally "disfavored and granted only if there is a strong reason to do so," News, L.L.C. v. Am. Media, Inc., No. 09 Civ. 2227 (PAC), 2013 WL 1746062, at \*3 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 23, 2013) (internal quotation marks omitted) (citing Roe v. City of New York, 151 F. Supp. 2d 495, 510 (S.D.N.Y. 2001)); see also Lipsky v. Commonwealth United Corp., 551 F.2d 887, 893 (2d Cir. 1976)), ample authority permits striking prayers for punitive damages where such relief is unavailable as a matter of law. See, e.g., In re Merrill Auction Rate Sec. Litig., 851 F. Supp. 2d 512, 544 (S.D.N.Y. 2012) (granting motion to strike sections of complaint asserting punitive damages, because pleadings did not meet high bar for punitive damages in non-fraud case of breach of fiduciary duty), aff'd sub nom. La. Pac. Corp. v. Merrill & Co., 571 F. App'x 8 (2d Cir. 2014); Cerveceria Modelo, S.A. de C.V. v. USPA Accessories LLC, No. 07 Civ. 7998 (HB), 2008 WL 1710910, at \*5-9 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 10, 2008) (granting motion to strike prayer for punitive damages for failure to allege level of high moral culpability + +necessary to sustain punitive damages award in case involving fraud and deceit); Ladenburg Thalmann & Co. v. Imaging Diagnostic Sys., Inc., 176 F. Supp. 2d 199, 207 (S.D.N.Y. 2001) (granting motion to strike punitive damages because complaint did not allege, inter alia, egregious conduct sufficient to sustain such an award); Brady v. Port. Auth. ofN.Y. & No. 93 Civ. 1679 (NG) (CLP), 1998 WL 724061, at \*2-3 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 15, 1998) (granting motion to strike punitive damages claims on grounds that Port Authority was immune from such damages); Nash v. Coram Healthcare Corp., No. 96 Civ. 0298 (LMM), 1996 WL 363166, at \*4 (S.D.N.Y. June 28, 1996) (granting motion to strike prayer for punitive damages because complaint did not allege facts sufficient to support such damages in breach of contract case). + +Here, there is practical wisdom in treating defendant's motion as one to strike, if doing so is necessary to enable the Court to resolve at the jump the viability of Doe's prayer for punitive damages. With numerous personal injury actions pending against the Epstein estate as a result of the recent enactment of the New York Child Victims Act, there is value in clarifying—for the parties and settlors—the damages available in actions where the law permits a sure answer on this point. + +Doe's final argument is that USVI, not New York, law governs whether punitive damages are available. Because this Court sits in New York, it applies a New York choice of law analysis to that question. See Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Elec. Mfg. Co., 313 U.S. 487, 496 (1941); Md. Cas. Co. v. Conti Cas. Co., 332 F.3d 145, 151 (2d Cir. 2003) ("A federal court sitting in diversity applies the choice-of-law rules of the forum state."). "Where, as here, the claims sound in tort, New York courts apply an `interest analysis' to determine choice-of-law issues." Golden v. Wyeth, Inc., No. 04 Civ. 2841 (JS), 2013 WL 4500879, at \*1 (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 20, 2013). Under that analysis, punitive damages are considered to be conduct-regulating, and "the law of the jurisdiction where the tort occurred will generally apply." See, e.g., Starr Indem. & Liab. Co. v. Am. Claims Mgmt, Inc., No. 14 Civ. 0463 (JMF), 2015 WL 2152816, \*3 (S.D.N.Y. May 7, 2015) (quoting Guidi v. Inter-Conti Hotels Corp., No. 95 Civ. 9006 (LAP), 2003 WL 1907901, at \*I (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 16,2003)); Bauta v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., No. 14 Civ. 3725 (RER), 2019 WL 8060183, at \*10 (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 4, 2019). Here, the tons alleged occurred entirely in New York. The personal injury claims which Doe's Complaint brings arise from sexual assaults and related conduct that, as alleged, occurred exclusively within New York City—in and around Epstein's Manhattan townhouse. + +Doe counters by noting that, while this rule applies as a general matter, it may be overcome if there is good reason not to apply it. Doe Mem. at 5 (citing Nat'l Jewish Democratic Council v. Adelson, 417 F. Supp. 3d 416, 424-25 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)). In arguing that there is reason not to apply New York law to the punitive damages question here, Doe relies on the doctrine of dopecage, under which courts may treat the choice of law analysis for one (or more) issues in a case—in this instance, the availability of punitive damages—as distinct from the rest of its analysis, here the applicability of New York law to Doe's tort claims for compensatory damages. Id.; see also 2002 R. Buchalter Alaska Tr. v. Phila. Fin. Life Assurance Co., 96 F. Supp. 3d 182, 200 (S.D.N.Y. 2015); Fed. Hous. Fin. Agency v. Ally Fin. Inc., No. 11 Civ. 7010 (DLC), 2012 WL 6616061, at \*5 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 19, 2012). + +Doe argues that, although New York may have the greater interest in resolving issues relating to compensatory damages, the USVI, where the executors are domiciled and where Epstein's will is to be probated, has the greater interest as to punitive damages, which, unlike compensatory damages, are defendant-focused. Doe Mem. at 7—8. Doe does not argue that the executor-defendants themselves merit punishment or are in need of deterrence. Instead, Doe + +argues that Epstein's decision to alter his will shortly before his suicide to provide that it would be probated in the USVI was strategically motivated. She argues that his executors "should not be permitted to selectively avail themselves of certain benefits of USVI law but avoid those aspects of USVI law that they do not like." Id. at 7. + +The Court is unpersuaded. Whatever benefits Epstein envisioned for his estate by virtue of probating his will in the USVI, Doe does not articulate any relevant to this litigation. Other than conclusorily, Doe does not argue that the decision to probate Epstein's will in the USVI will have any adverse bearing on a personal injury action brought against the estate in New York that involves tortious conduct in New York. Doe does not argue, for example, that the probating of Epstein's will in the USVI stands to insulate his assets from recovery from such a plaintiff, or otherwise impede her or others victimized in New York from recovering on meritorious claims. Doe's point that the estate may prosper from being probated in the USVI is disconnected from her claims.3 + +More fundamentally, Doe does not articulate any concrete interest that the USVI has in either vindicating the rights of a victim sexually abused in a Manhattan townhouse in 2004 and 2005 or, specially relevant to punitive damages, in assuring that the perpetrator of that abuse is adequately punished and deterred. In contrast, the Second Circuit has noted the strong interest that New York has with respect to "conduct-regulating" rules, including regarding damages, with respect to unlawful behavior within its borders: + +"If conflicting conduct-regulating laws are at issue, the law of the jurisdiction where the tort occurred will generally apply because that jurisdiction has the greatest interest in regulating behavior within its borders." Cooney v. Osgood + +3 If anything, the probating of the estate in the USVI may stand to benefit the estate's creditors, and thereby potentially Doe, to the extent that an estate probated in the USVI may avoid the high estate-tax rates imposed by New York State. + +Mach., Inc., 81 N.Y.2d 66, 72 (1993). In Licci ex rel. Licci v. Lebanese Canadian Bank, SAL[,] ... we observed that, under New York law, when the jurisdictions of the conduct and injury are distinct, "it is the place of the allegedly wrongful conduct that generally has superior 'interests in protecting the reasonable expectations of the parties who relied on the laws of that place to govern their primary conduct and in the admonitory effect that applying its law will have on similar conduct in the future.' [739 F.3d 45, 50-51 (2d Cir. 2013)] (quoting [v. Boy Scouts of Am., Inc., 65 N.Y.2d 189, 198 (1985)]) (alterations omitted). Here, the allegedly wrongful conduct . . . took place in New York .... We therefore conclude that New York's rules on fraud damages and negligent misrepresentation apply. + +AHW Inv. P'ship, MFS v. Citigroup, Inc., 661 F. App'x 2, 5 (2d Cir. 2016). New York's interest is also reinforced by the fact that Doe's suit is timely only by virtue of the state's recent enactment of the New York Child Victims Act, which temporarily revived time-barred suits. See Cmplt.1 107. + +That New York law governs the availability of punitive damages is further reinforced by Doe's having sued the executor defendants under EPTL § 11-3.2(aX1). It is problematic for her to cherrypick within that provision, invoking the part that authorizes a personal injury suit against an executor while disclaiming the balance, which delimits the recovery available in such a suit.4 See Nissen, 940 F. Supp. at 457 ("[I]t would be an anomalous situation indeed if plaintiff were allowed to proceed with this [§] 1983 action against the estate of because of [§] 11-3.2(aX1), while at the same time he was allowed to recover relief in the form of punitive damages, which clearly is beyond the scope of relief which that statute authorizes."). Such a result is also inconsistent with the doctrine of dopecage, where one forum's law is "applied to regulate certain issues arising from a given transaction or occurrence, while those of another system regulate the other issues." v. Twin City Fire Ins. Co., 492 F. Supp. 2d 308, 328 + +4 Doe's claims undisputedly all qualify as personal injury claims. See N.Y. Gen. Constr. Law § 37-a. (defining "personal injury" as including "an assault, battery, false imprisonment, or other actionable injury to the person either of the plaintiff, or of another"). Doe does not argue otherwise. + +n.11 (S.D.N.Y. 2007) (emphasis added), aff'd sub nom. v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 539 F.3d 135 (2d Cir. 2008). Here, Doe, in selectively drawing upon EPTL § 11-3.2(aX1), seeks to invoke depecage to apply two different sets of laws to a single issue. The doctrine does not invite such a result. + +Finally, Adelson, on which Doe relies in claiming that USVI law governs punitive damages, is inapposite. Adelson had brought an earlier action in this District for defamation, in breach of Nevada law, against the National Jewish Democratic Council and its chair (together, "NJDC"). Adelson, 417 F. Supp. 3d at 420-21. That action had been dismissed pursuant to Nevada's anti-SLAPP statute. NJDC then sued Adelson, seeking punitive damages under that same Nevada statute. Id. On Adelson's motion to dismiss the punitive damages prayer, Judge Oetken held that Nevada's interest was stronger than New York's as to punitive damages, because Adelson had brought the initial suit under Nevada law and because it had been dismissed under the Nevada SLAPP statute on which the NJDC now pursued punitive damages. He reasoned that "because the litigant has attempted to use Nevada's defamation law to chill First Amendment rights, Nevada has a corresponding interest in punishing the litigant for maliciously invoking Nevada law and in deterring future litigants from doing the same." Adelson, 417 F. Supp. 3d at 426 (citing =, 65 N.Y.2d at 198). Noting that "[p]unitive damages are designed to punish the defendant, not to compensate the plaintiff," Judge Oetken explained that "the choice-of-law inquiry for punitive damages provisions is necessarily defendant-focused" in this way. Id. (internal quotation marks omitted) (citing Golden, 2013 WL 4500879, at \*3). By contrast, Judge Oetken concluded that New York's interest in the dispute was "relatively attenuated" and effectively limited to the fact that the suit was filed in federal district court in Manhattan where, notably, the claims were brought under Nevada + +defamation law. "After all, New York lacks a particularized interest either in protecting defendants from liability under Nevada defamation law or in controlling the behavior of litigants who file in the federal courts. And where the locus jurisdiction has a merely fortuitous relationship with the case, that jurisdiction's interest in the case is minimal." Id. at 426-27 (internal quotation marks and alterations omitted). Doe's case in this District, in contrast to Adelson, does not build on a prior litigation in, or based on the law of, the USVI. + +In any event, the choice of law debate here appears academic. That is because, while the USVI does not have a statute on point and USVI courts have not squarely resolved the issue, it is likely that USVI common law would not permit an award of punitive damages against an estate. In 2011, the USVI Supreme Court instructed courts to apply what it terms a "Banks analysis" to determine USVI common law. This entails consideration of "three non-dispositive factors": (1) whether any USVI court has previously adopted a particular rule; (2) the position taken by a majority of courts of other jurisdictions; and (3) most importantly, which rule represents the soundest rule for the USVI. See Gov't of Virgin Islands v. =, 60 V.I. 597, 600 (2014); Matthew v. Herman, 56 V.I. 674, 680 (2012); Banks v. Int7 Rental & Leasing Corp., 55 V.I. 967, 979 (2011). The parties differ as to how these factors apply, but the executors' assessment is the more persuasive. + +As to the first Banks factor, USVI courts have repeatedly cited the Restatement (Second) of Torts § 908 favorably. Twice, albeit in dicta, they have expressly quoted the language in comment (a) to § 908 that bars an award of punitive damages against the estate of a decedent tortfeasor. See v. Dowson Holding Co., 51 V.I. 619, 628 (D.V.I. 2009) ("Punitive damages are not awarded against the representatives of a deceased tortfeasor nor, ordinarily, in an action under a death statute." (quoting Restatement (Second) of Torts § 908 cmt. a (1979)) + +(citing v. Atlas Motor Inn, Inc., 16 V.I. 367, 368-69 (D.V.I. 1979) (interpreting the Virgin Island's wrongful death statue, 5 V.I.C. § 76, to preclude punitive damages)); Booth v. Bowen, Civ. No. 2006-217 (CVG), 2008 WL 220067, at \*5 (D.V.I. Jan. 10, 2008) (same)5; see also Pappas v. Hotel on the Cay Time-Sharing Ass 'n, 69 V.I. 3, 15 n.8 (V.I. Super. Ct. 2015) (applying Banks analysis to hold that USVI courts would adopt Restatement (Second) of Torts § 908, and citing five USVI cases in accord); Powell v. Chi-Co's Distrib. Inc., No. ST-13-TOR-14, 2014 WL 1394183, at \*2 n.I3 (V.1. Super. Ct. Apr. 3, 2014) ("Applying a Banks analysis, the Court finds that Restatement (Second) of Torts § 908(2) reflects the common law of this jurisdiction .... [C]onsidering the longstanding application of the Restatement (Second) of Torts § 908(2) in this jurisdiction and the apparent widespread application of this rule in a majority of jurisdictions, the Court finds that the Restatement (Second) of Tons § 908(2) represents the soundest rule for the Virgin Islands, and is in accord with local public policy."). Doe has not cited any contrary authority. + +As to the second Banks factor, the parties agree that, consistent with the Restatement, most U.S. jurisdictions do not permit an award of punitive damages against a tortfeasor's estate. See, e.g., Crabtree a rel. Kemp v. Estate of Crabtree, 837 N.E.2d 135, 138 (hid. 2005) ("[t]he majority view denies punitive damages" from a deceased tortfeasor's estate); Jay Zitter, Annotation, Claim for punitive damages in ton action as surviving death of tortfeasor or person wronged, 30 A.L.R. 4th 707 (2020); 1 Punitive Damages: Law and Prac. 2d § 9:8 (2019 ed.) ("The prevailing view appears to be that punitive damages may not be recovered against the estate of a deceased wrongdoer."). Doe notes that some jurisdictions (like New York) have adopted this result by + +s The decisions in and Booth were dicta on this point, because the executor in each case was the plaintiff, not the defendant. + +statute while others have done so by court decision. Doe Mem. at 12. This distinction, however, does not appear germane to the Banks inquiry. + +As to the third Banks factor, the parties have not cited any evidence—beyond USVI courts having repeatedly cited Restatement § 908 with favor, including in the course of a Banks analysis—as to which rule would most soundly fit the USVI's interests. Beyond recognizing that USVI courts appear comfortable with the majority rule, the Court therefore cannot assign significant independent weight to this factor. Doe notes that the USVI's attorney general, in a separate lawsuit, is pursuing punitive damages against the Epstein estate based on alleged predations by Epstein in the USVI. See Mullkoff Decl. Ex. B ¶¶ 307-10. Doe further argues that because the only heir listed in Epstein's will—his brother Mark Epstein—allegedly knew or had constructive knowledge of Epstein's pattern of sexual abuse, it is just to deny him recovery from the estate by exposing the estate to punitive damages awards in cases such as hers. Doe Mem. at 11. But the decision by a government lawyer to attempt to obtain such damages in a high-profile case involving allegations of extreme conduct, or the alleged guilty knowledge of an heir in this case, do not speak to the question that the third Banks factor assays: which rule of law best durably serves the USVI's interests. The Court therefore has no basis to treats this Banks factor as countervailing, let alone outweighing, the first two. + +### CONCLUSION + +For the reasons above, the Court grants the defendant-executors' motion to dismiss the prayer for punitive damages against them. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion pending at docket 17. + +SO ORDERED. + +![]()Dated: April 28, 2020 +New York, New York \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737399/EFTA02737399.metadata.json b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737399/EFTA02737399.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5a51bf5bd8ea6d0da3db091d44c2b81e60c58385 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737399/EFTA02737399.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,811 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737399.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 17, + "chars": 32250, + "elapsed_seconds": 3.04, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 281.8328552246094, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 281.8328552246094, + 100.10302734375 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 100.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "OPINION & ORDER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 395.964, + 182.25 + ], + [ + 509.0932922363281, + 182.25 + ], + [ + 509.0932922363281, + 197.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 395.964, + 197.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "I. Background", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 485.18999999999994 + ], + [ + 173.94503784179688, + 485.18999999999994 + ], + [ + 173.94503784179688, + 501.363037109375 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 501.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A. Doe's Complaint", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 511.11 + ], + [ + 233.96229553222656, + 511.11 + ], + [ + 233.96229553222656, + 527.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 527.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B. The Executors' Partial Motion to Dismiss", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 263.25 + ], + [ + 359.43621826171875, + 263.25 + ], + [ + 359.43621826171875, + 279.363037109375 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 279.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "H. Applicable Legal Standards Under Rule 1.2(hX6)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 481.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 360.1666564941406, + 481.95000000000005 + ], + [ + 360.1666564941406, + 498.363037109375 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 498.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "HI. Discussion", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 181.44 + ], + [ + 164.4300537109375, + 181.44 + ], + [ + 164.4300537109375, + 196.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 196.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CONCLUSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 539.46 + ], + [ + 350.49066162109375, + 539.46 + ], + [ + 350.49066162109375, + 555.4335174560547 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 555.4335174560547 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 50 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 50 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737399" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737416/EFTA02737416.md b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737416/EFTA02737416.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3d408f4799739ea8846fad583d86723ec48c0eba --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737416/EFTA02737416.md @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +Bennet J. Moskowitz bennelmoskowitz@troutman.com + +April 28, 2020 + +## VIA ELECTRONIC COURT FILING + +Hon. Debra Freeman Daniel Moynihan United States Courthouse 500 Pearl St. New York, NY 10007 + +Re: 1:19-cv-10788 (GHW) (DCF + +Dear Judge Freeman: + +We represent Defendants Darren,. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (together, the "Co-Executors"), in the above-referenced action. We write to supplement the Co-Executors' pending motion to dismiss (ECF Doc. 26) with the enclosed copy of the Opinion & Order entered today by The Hon. Paul A. Engelmayer in another personal injury action against the Co-Executors (Mary Doe v. Darren . Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, as executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, and , 19-civ-10758 (PAE) (DCF)). In His Honor's Opinion & Order, Judge Engelmayer grants the Co-Executors' motion to dismiss the plaintiffs punitive damages claim against them as a matter of law on grounds applicable to Plaintiffs claim for punitive damages in this action. + +Respectfully submitted, + +s/Bennet J. Moskowitz Bennet J. Moskowitz + +cc: Counsel of Record (via ECF) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737416/EFTA02737416.metadata.json b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737416/EFTA02737416.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5bcf949e76e08c411e3347064b69e7bb34434610 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737416/EFTA02737416.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737416.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1122, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.71, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "VIA ELECTRONIC COURT FILING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 213.84 + ], + [ + 249.1669921875, + 213.84 + ], + [ + 249.1669921875, + 227.070556640625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 227.070556640625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737416" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737417/EFTA02737417.md b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737417/EFTA02737417.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..47c7f5d657aa9f1e652cbbf905cbe77af6e885f4 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737417/EFTA02737417.md @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@ +## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK + +JANE DOE 15, + +-v- + +Plaintiff, + +DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, as Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, + +Defendants. + +19 Civ. 10653 (PAE) + +## ORDER + +PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge: + +In this diversity action, plaintiff Jane Doe 15 ("Doe")i brings claims of battery, assault, and intentional infliction of emotional distress against Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, in their capacities as co-executors of the estate of Jeffrey Epstein. These claims arise from Doe's allegations of sexual trafficking and abuse perpetrated against her by Epstein in 2004, when she was age 15. Doe alleges that Doe visited Epstein's Manhattan townhouse in New York City, where Epstein's secretary photographed her and groomed her for future sexual exploitation; on Epstein's behalf, the secretary later invited Doe to visit Epstein at his ranch in New Mexico, and arranged Doe's visit. See Dkt. 1 ("Cmplt.") ¶¶ 2-4,25-26,30-37. Epstein's sexual abuse of Doe occurred during the visit to the New Mexico ranch that ensued. M.1115-6,41-69. + +The defendants have filed a partial motion to dismiss, directed solely at Doe's prayer for punitive damages. They argue that New Mexico law governs Doe's claims, and that under New Mexico law, punitive damages are unavailable in a personal injury action against the personal + +I Doe has been granted leave to proceed pseudonymously. Dkt. 22. + +representative of an estate. See Dkt. 18 (motion); Dkt. 19 (memorandum of law in support); Dkt. 34 (reply). Doe opposes that motion. Dkt. 29 (memorandum of law in opposition). + +The Court grants defendants' motion. The Court's analysis substantially tracks the analysis in a memorandum and opinion it issued earlier this week granting a motion seeking the same relief in another case in which a plaintiff has brought the same personal injury claims against the executors arising from sexual abuse Epstein allegedly perpetrated on her. See Mary Doe v. Indyke and Kahn, 19 Civ. 10758 (PAE) ("Mary Doe"); see id. Dkt. 38 ("Mary Doe Op.") (issued April 28, 2020). The Court here incorporates that decision by reference. + +In Mary Doe, Epstein's abuse was alleged to have occurred in his Manhattan townhouse. The Court noted that the New York statute that authorizes personal injury actions against the personal representative of the decedent precludes punitive damages in such actions, see Mary Doe Op. at 4 (citing New York Estates, Powers and Trusts Law ("EPTL") § 11-3.2(a)(1)), and required dismissal of Mary Doe's prayer for such damages, id. at 4-6. The Court rejected Mary Doe's counter-arguments: that defendants' motion was premature, id. at 6-7, and improperly styled as a motion to dismiss, id. at 7-9, and that the law of the United States Virgin Islands ("USVI"), where Epstein's estate is being probated, applies, and permits punitive damages against an estate in such an action, id. at 9-16. As to the final argument, the Court noted that under New York choice-of-law rules, the substantive law of the location of the tortious conduct occurred generally applies as to punitive damages, and that there was no reason to depart from that rule here, id. at 9-14. In any event, the Court held, it is likely that, as a matter of common law, the USVI—like New York, the majority of states, and Restatement (Second) of Torts § 908—would not allow imposition of punitive damages on a tortfeasor's estate, id. at 14-16. + +The parties in this case are represented by the same counsel as in Mary Doe, and make substantially the same arguments for and against dismissal. The one variation is that, because Epstein's abuse is alleged to have occurred at the New Mexico ranch, defendants argue that New Mexico law applies. See Dkt. 19 at 2-6; Dkt. 34 at 5—8. But that, defendants argue, does not change the result, because New Mexico common law as announced by the state supreme court, like EPTL § I I-3.2(a)(1), bars punitive damages in a personal injury action against a tortfeasor's estate. See Jaramillo v. Providence Wash. Ins. Co., 871 P.2d 1343, 1351-52 (N.M. 1994) (canvassing laws; noting that "punishment and deterrence are not accomplished by enabling recovery of punitive damages from the estate of deceased tortfeasors"; and adopting majority rule that "[w]hen the tortfeasor cannot be punished for his culpable behavior, punitive damages no longer have the desired effect and, therefore, the victim loses the legal entitlement to recover those damages"); see also Barbara R. as next friend of S.R. v.=, No. 03 Civ. 1225 (MCA) (WDS), 2006 WL 8443923, at \*28 (D.N.M. Sept. 30, 2006) (citing Jaramillo and noting that "[t]he rationale behind this rule is that 'to punish the estate ignores the central purpose of punitive damages, which is to punish the tortfeasor and to deter him from repeating the wrongful act"). Doe, for her part, does not dispute that New Mexico law mirrors New York law. Instead, in opposing dismissal, she makes the same three arguments as in Mary Doe. + +The Court again finds punitive damages unavailable as a matter of law and plaintiffs' counter-arguments unavailing. As to the third argument, relating to choice of law, unlike in Mary Doe, there is indeed room for debate about which jurisdiction's law applies. But the debate is between New York (where the grooming process began) and New Mexico (where the sexual abuse occurred). And under either state's law, imposition of punitive damages on the + +Epstein estate is squarely prohibited. Doe does not have any stronger argument than did Mary Doe that USVI law applies in her case, or, if it did, that it would permit such damages. + +The Court, accordingly, grants defendants' motion to dismiss the prayer for punitive damages. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion pending at Dkt. 18. + +SO ORDERED. + +Dated: April 30, 2020 New York, New York + +Paul A. Engelmaye United States District Judge \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737417/EFTA02737417.metadata.json b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737417/EFTA02737417.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7edb8f08c426d6593fded68bdb132aa14525cea2 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737417/EFTA02737417.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,215 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737417.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 4, + "chars": 5947, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.93, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 69.156, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 281.7991943359375, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 281.7991943359375, + 100.10302734375 + ], + [ + 69.156, + 100.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 429.624, + 183.06 + ], + [ + 479.4378662109375, + 183.06 + ], + [ + 479.4378662109375, + 197.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 429.624, + 197.2330322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 26 + ], + [ + "Line", + 12 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737417" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737421/EFTA02737421.md b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737421/EFTA02737421.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..20d56e7ddf2d8456ada99b48df1663ba6297d765 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737421/EFTA02737421.md @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +Bennet J. Moskowitz + +bennelmoskowitz@lroutman.com + +April 30, 2020 + +## VIA ELECTRONIC COURT FILING + +Hon. Debra Freeman Daniel Moynihan United States Courthouse 500 Pearl St. New York, NY 10007 + +Re: 1:19-cv-10788 (GHW) (DCF) + +Dear Judge Freeman: + +We represent Defendants Darren,. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (together, the "Co-Executors"), in the above-referenced action. We write to further supplement the Co-Executors' pending motion to dismiss (ECF Doc. 26) with the enclosed copy of the Opinion & Order entered today by The Hon. Paul A. Engelmayer in another personal injury action against the Co-Executors (Jane Doe 15 v. Darren.. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, as executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, 19-civ-10653 (PAE) (DCF)). In His Honor's Opinion & Order, Judge Engelmayer grants the Co-Executors' motion to dismiss the plaintiff's punitive damages claim against them as a matter of law on grounds applicable to Plaintiff's claim for punitive damages in this action. + +Respectfully submitted, + +s/Bennet J. Moskowitz Bennet J. Moskowitz + +cc: Counsel of Record (via ECF) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737421/EFTA02737421.metadata.json b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737421/EFTA02737421.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ac3ff312664de322e39d7c6a639257325b4ba896 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737421/EFTA02737421.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737421.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1131, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.72, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "VIA ELECTRONIC COURT FILING", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 212.22000000000003 + ], + [ + 249.1669921875, + 212.22000000000003 + ], + [ + 249.1669921875, + 227.070556640625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 227.070556640625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737421" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737422/EFTA02737422.md b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737422/EFTA02737422.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..098e7b8db79d204fb81c0eaf6b0612c2de59bbb6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737422/EFTA02737422.md @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@ +May 11, 2020 + +**By ECF** + +Hon. Debra Freeman + +U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York + +Daniel [REDACTED] Moynihan + +United States Courthouse + +500 Pearl St. + +New York, NY 10007-1312 + +Re: *Jane Doe 15 v. Indyke et al.*, 19-cv-10653 (PAE)(DCF) +*Mary Doe v. Indyke et al.*, 19-cv-10758 (PAE)(DCF) +[REDACTED] v. *Indyke et al.*, 19-cv-10788 (GHW)(DCF) + +Your Honor: + +We represent the plaintiffs in the three above-referenced cases. With the consent of Defendants Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (together, the "Co-Executors"), we write respectfully to request that the Court extend the current discovery deadlines in these three cases by ninety (90) days and the Co-Executors' answer deadlines in the *Jane Doe 15* and *Mary Doe* matters by thirty (30) days. + +The COVID-19 pandemic continues to cause substantial difficulties for all parties, and is inhibiting the parties' ability to fully conduct discovery. In addition, as Your Honor is aware, the parties are awaiting the approval by the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands of a voluntary claims resolution program. If that program is approved in the near future and quickly implemented, the plaintiffs in these actions wish to participate in it, and the parties are hopeful that the program might resolve the plaintiffs' claims. As a result of this confluence of factors – the substantial challenges to the discovery process as a result of the pandemic and the possibility that the alternative dispute resolution mechanism may soon be available and speedy – the parties believe that the most appropriate and efficient course of action would be for the parties to enter into an informal stay of the three proceedings for thirty days, after which time the parties will evaluate the current status of both the pandemic-related limitations and the claims resolution program and consider whether an additional informal stay would be appropriate. We will of course confer and write again to keep the Court apprised. + +In order to facilitate that informal stay while ensuring that the parties are not prejudiced in the discovery process if and when the litigation process + +resumes, we ask the Court to extend the current discovery deadlines in these three cases, as set forth in the Court's April 14, 2020 Endorsed Memorandum, by ninety (90) days, and to extend the Co-Executors' answer deadlines in the *Jane Doe 15* and *Mary Doe* matters by thirty (30) days as follows: + +- • the deadline for the Co-Executors to file Answers in the *Jane Doe 15* and *Mary Doe* actions, which are currently due on May 12 and May 14, respectively, be extended to June 8, 2020; +- • the deadline for Plaintiffs to file any motions to amend the pleadings or to join any additional parties be extended from June 1, 2020 to August 31, 2020; +- • the deadline for the Parties to submit joint status reports to the Court, regarding discovery and the progress of settlement discussions, be extended from June 1, 2020 to August 31, 2020; +- • the deadline for the completion of fact discovery be extended from July 10, 2020 to October 8, 2020; +- • the deadline for service of Plaintiffs' expert reports be extended from July 10, 2020 to October 8, 2020; +- • the deadline for service of the Co-Executors' rebuttal reports be extended from August 10, 2020 to November 9, 2020; and +- • the deadline for the completion of expert discovery be extended from August 31, 2020 to November 30, 2020. + +The Court has granted one previous extension of the discovery deadlines, of thirty (30) days, on April 14, 2020. The Co-Executors' answer deadlines in the *Jane Doe 15* and *Mary Doe* actions have not been extended since the Court ruled on the motions to dismiss in those actions. + +We appreciate the Court's attention to these matters. + +Respectfully submitted, + +/s/ Mariann Meier Wang + +Mariann Meier Wang + +cc: Bennet J. Moskowitz, Counsel for Defendants (by ECF) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737422/EFTA02737422.metadata.json b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737422/EFTA02737422.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c069dd8f1e1ed0e7564dfeacaa9a551af9f699b3 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737422/EFTA02737422.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,80 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737422.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 3945, + "elapsed_seconds": 8.41, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 28 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737422" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737424/EFTA02737424.md b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737424/EFTA02737424.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..55c8b293755ca15da4ca3898df5eea0d5d88cfb2 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737424/EFTA02737424.md @@ -0,0 +1,526 @@ +### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK + +In re: + +Docket #1:19-cv-10788- + +. : GHW-DCF + +Plaintiff, + +- against - + +INDYKE, DARREN K. et al, + +Defendants. + +: New York, New York + +May 22, 2020 + +TELEPHONE CONFERENCE + +### PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE HONORABLE JUDGE DEBRA C. FREEMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MAGISTRATE JUDGE + +## APPEARANCES: + +For Plaintiffs: + +For the Defendants: + +Cuti Hecker Wang, LLP (NYC) + +By: Mariann M. Wang, Esq. + +Daniel Mullkoff, Esq. + +305 Broadway, Suite 607 + +New York, NY 10007 + +212-620-2603 + +Troutman Sanders LLP (NYC) + +By: Bennet J. Moskowitz, Esq. + +Matthew J. Aaronson, Esq. + +Valerie Sirota, Esq. + +875 Third Avenue + +New York, NY 10022 + +212-704-6087 + +Transcription Service: Carole Ludwig, Transcription Services + +155 East Fourth Street #3C + +New York, New York 10009 + +Phone: (212) 420-0771 + +Email: Transcription420@aol.com + +For the Defendants: Troutman Sanders By: Molly S. DiRago, Esq. 27 West Monroe Street - Suite 3900 Chicago, IL 60606 312-759-1926 + +Proceedings conducted telephonically and recorded by electronic sound recording; Transcript produced by transcription service + +## INDEX + +### EXAMINATIONS + +Witness + +None + +Exhibit Number + +None + +Re- Re- + +Direct Cross Direct Cross + +## EXHIBITS + +Description + +Voir ID In Dire + +2 + +3 + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +HONORABLE DEBRA C. FREEMAN (THE COURT): All + +right, so this is Judge Freeman. And if I've got this + +calendared right, this should be a conference in three of + +the cases involving the Jeffrey Epstein Estate: Jane Doe + +v. Indyke, 19-cv-10653; Mary Doe v. Indyke, 19-cv-10758; + +and v. Indyke, 19-cv-10788. + +Anybody have a different understanding as to why + +you're here? + +(No response.) + +THE COURT: No. Can I have your appearances, + +starting with the first of the cases that I listed, the + +Jane Doe case? + +MS. MARIANN M. WANG: So for plaintiffs, Mariann + +Wang. And I believe my colleague, Dan Mullkoff, is on the + +line. And we represent the plaintiffs in all three cases, + +so (Stopped talking.) + +THE COURT: Okay. And on defendants' side? + +MR. BENNET J. MOSKOWITZ: Good morning, your Honor. + +Bennet Moskowitz, Troutman Sanders, for the co-executors. And + +on the line should be my colleagues, Matthew Aaronson, Valerie + +Sirota, and Molly DiRago. And that's true for all three of + +23 the actions. + +24 THE COURT: Okay. So that would count for 1, 2, 3, + +25 4, 5, 6 people. Is my law clerk on? + +2 + +3 THE COURT: Okay, that's Hannah . She's one 4 of my clerks. There should be still more people on, based on 5 what I heard when i joined the call. Is there anyone else on 6 the call? + +Yes, Judge, I'm here. + +7 MS. EMILY FALL: Hi. My name is Emily Fall; I'm a 8 reporter with 3M Canny 4 Productions. I'm also on the call. + +9 THE COURT: Okay, is there anyone else on? + +10 MR. JAMES : Your Honor, this is James 11 I'm a reporter with ABC News, and I am monitoring the call and 12 will keep my line on mute. + +13 THE COURT: Okay. I've slightly lost count. If 14 there's anyone else on the call from the public or press, you 15 are, of course, welcome to listen in. I would appreciate it 16 if you would keep your phones on mute, which you seem to have 17 been doing until I asked who was here. + +18 Do we have a court reporter? I know that in one of 19 the conferences scheduled today -- it may have been the one 20 that's at 11 o'clock -- there was a request to have a court 21 reporter. No? + +22 All right. So the conference is being recorded 23 through the AT & T conference system. And if anyone wants a 24 transcript, you can get it through us through that system. 25 Because someone may be trying to transcribe it from an audio + +2 recording, if you do speak, please state your name before you 3 speak so someone can keep the voices straight and be able to 4 make a transcript that makes sense if there should be a need. + +5 All right, so what I thought I would do, rather than 6 have a conference in all of the cases that I have in front of 7 me for supervision, I thought I would take them in clusters 8 where issues had arisen. In each of these three cases there 9 was a consent letter filed for an extension of time. And even 10 though it was on consent, I thought I would hear from you as 11 to this concept of an informal stay and just what was 12 happening. And I don't mind a 30-day extension of deadlines, 13 but I wanted to get a sense of where things were with respect 14 to potential settlement. And, you know, I read in the news as 15 much as anyone else, but that doesn't really tell me the full 16 story. So can I just hear from plaintiffs' counsel about 17 general status here? + +18 MS. WANG: Sure, your Honor This is Mariann Wang 19 again. So we have made some progress in terms of the 20 litigation; that is, we've exchanged discovery responses, 21 interrogatory responses + +22 THE COURT: Hold on a second. Did someone join the 23 call? No? I want to make sure + +24 MS. LAURA MENNINGER: Hi. I'm just -- I'm listening 25 in, your Honor. It's counsel for another party. + +2 THE COURT: II, that's fine. Okay. + +3 MS. WANG: Can I just ask counsel for which party? + +4 Just to know. + +5 , I'm sorry. + +6 THE COURT: Are you counsel in another case that's + +7 pending in front of me? + +MS. MENNINGER: Yes, your Honor. I have a hearing + +in front of you at nine o'clock AM. This is Laura Menninger + +for Ms. Maxwell. + +THE COURT: At nine o'clock? You must mean 11 + +o'clock New York time? + +, I'm sorry, yes. I'm in + +Colorado. Yeah, 11 o'clock Eastern time. Thank you. + +THE COURT: Okay. You're welcome. + +All right, you were saying, counsel? + +MS. WANG: Sure. So, again, Mariann Wang for + +plaintiffs. So we have made some progress. We're also + +we were kind of on the cusp of about to exchange a lot of + +paper discovery and starting to talk about depositions. + +And so there was progress being made on the litigation + +side. At the same time that aspect of litigation was + +not -- was hindered a bit because of the pandemic, just in + +terms of communications and timeliness and ease of + +gathering things because of, obviously, not being able to + +2 meet in person with the clients. We had also started to 3 have some essentially, I guess, one would say some 4 conflicts potentially with defense counsel about whether 5 and how depositions can proceed, in person or remotely. + +6 In any event, because of the kind of -- the 7 combination of perfect storm of both the hindrance of the 8 pandemic and logistics -- should I stop? + +9 THE COURT: Yes. Did someone just join the call? + +10 MALE: Yes. Inner City Press. Not a participant. + +11 THE COURT: Okay. Fine. If you could keep your 12 phone on mute, I would appreciate that. + +13 MALE: I will. Thanks. + +14 THE COURT: Go ahead, Ms. Wang. + +15 MS. WANG: Again, Ms. Mariann Wang. And, at the 16 same time, our understanding that in the Virgin Islands 17 there seems to be potential progress and potentially in the 18 short term a possibility, really, of getting the claims 19 resolution process started. We just felt that it might 20 make sense to put a pause and see whether that would have 21 some, you know, traction and whether we could get going on 22 that before essentially, really, both working extremely 23 hard and potentially draining resources on the estate front 24 of, you know, having apparently four or five lawyers 25 working nonstop on fighting us to some degree. It just + +2 seemed to make sense to hit pause for a little while. So 3 that's the basic concept. + +4 THE COURT: I will say on defendants' side you 5 seem to have four attorneys on this call. I hope you're 6 keeping costs under control under the circumstances. + +7 So I gather what you want to do is you don't want 8 an extension of discovery; what you want to do is basically 9 have a hiatus of discovery and then put the same amount of 10 time back on the clock as you had before? You want to stop 11 everything for 30 days and have another 30 days thereafter 12 to finish discovery if you need it? + +13 MS. WANG: That was the idea, yes, your Honor. + +14 THE COURT: How much optimism do you have during 15 this 30-day period this process is going to get rolling and 16 you'll be able to enter into it and get these cases 17 resolved? + +18 MS. WANG: Well, this is where it is a little bit 19 trying to balance. And I think that -- I mean, I have -- I 20 guess I probably would have more optimism -- I have 21 optimism that in 30 days we will know much more and we will 22 be able to then -- at least that's my hope -- be able to 23 really say okay, let's turn back to the litigation; or, 24 okay, let's really, you know, put this on hold/pause for 25 more amount of time because it looks like that's going. + +2 That's my hope, at least. Perhaps the estate would know 3 better, in fact, what -- you know, whether or not my 4 optimism is warranted. + +5 MR. MOSKOWITZ: Your Honor, Bennet Moskowitz. If 6 I may, I'm happy to provide an update about the Epstein 7 Victims Compensation Program. + +8 THE COURT: I'd appreciate it. + +9 MR. MOSKOWITZ: Sure. And I'd first, since you've 10 raised it, like to address the issue of keeping costs -- 11 and I can assure your Honor that the sole reason the 12 attorneys are on who are on is because it is more efficient 13 in terms of managing all the 15 or so active cases for only 14 those who are on to be on rather than have lengthy back-15 and-forth follow-ups with each other. And, in fact, we are 16 very concerned about litigation costs. And the people 17 driving those costs have been various plaintiffs' firms. I 18 will not necessarily pin that on Ms. Wang, as she is 19 actually trying to be reasonable here with the stay of some 20 sort, although -- which I'll get to -- we disagreed on how 21 to best do that. + +22 But it bears mentioning the biggest drivers have 23 been the plaintiffs' firms, including making the estate 24 fight for months over whether they can get punitive 25 damages, which Judge Engelmayer in two cases ruled that no, + +2 they can't; and as we've been saying all along, it's black 3 letter law. And those are two of the cases on which we're 4 meeting for you now. So I'm surprised to hear any comment 5 by plaintiffs' counsel attributing cost concerns to us. 6 The other culprit is the U.S. Virgin Islands attorney 7 general, which I'll get to. + +8 But to get back to the program, we are confident 9 that the program will commence by June 15, at the latest. 10 To date, counsel for around 69 individual claimants have 11 come forward, including through the U.S.V.I. Probate Court, 12 in support of the program. We believe that figure 13 constitutes the vast majority of claimants. In fact, we 14 are only aware of one claimant through her counsel who has 15 stated that she does not intend to participate. That's one 16 of the state court plaintiffs, not one of the cases before 17 your Honor. And I don't even know if that's the current 18 position of that individual. + +19 As your Honor is probably aware, we're now up to 20 seven Southern District of New York plaintiffs in three 21 lawsuits who have formally stayed their actions pending 22 their participation in the program, including most recently 23 , whom Boies Schiller represents. Ms. Wang's 24 three clients, of course, as they put it, sought this 25 informal stay, and they intend to participate in the + +2 program. The program administrator and the designers have 3 nearly finalized the protocol for the program. Recall 4 that's the nuts and bolts of how the program actually 5 works. They've done that in close consultation with 6 claimants' counsel and with input from the co-executors. + +7 So to recall, the only reason that the program did 8 not formally commence several months ago, which is what we 9 wanted, which would have avoided all these litigation 10 costs, is that in January 2020, the U.S. Virgin Islands 11 attorney general, who again does not represent a single 12 alleged victim, unilaterally imposed liens on the estate's 13 bank accounts in the Virgin Islands, freezing then-14 available funds for administration of the estate and 15 implementation of the program. That caused a huge delay 16 solely attributable to the attorney general of the Virgin 17 Islands. + +18 I am pleased to report that just a few days ago, 19 the estate and the U.S. Virgin Islands attorney general 20 have reached a resolution in principle, which I understand 21 would involve the attorney general finally stepping aside 22 so the program can finally formally proceed. There are a 23 few, I'd say, less contentious matters that still need to 24 be ironed out in that regard, but we expect that that 25 resolution would be finalized by next week and that we + +2 would notify the U.S.V.I. Probate Court about that sometime 3 next week. If, however, something unexpected occurs, and 4 because the need for the program has grown increasingly 5 urgent, and with the overwhelming support of claimants' 6 counsel, the co-executors in any event intend to seek 7 commencement of the program on June 15, absent some 8 contrary direction from the U.S.V.I. Probate Court, which 9 we do not expect. + +10 And, indeed, it bears mentioning that during the 11 February 4 hearing at the U.S.V.I. Probate Court, the judge 12 said, quote, "I think we agreed that everybody believes 13 this program is a great program," end quote. So, again, 14 the sole holdup here has been the attorney general of the 15 Virgin Islands. So I am confident in saying that the 16 program will formally move forward soon, that it will have 17 an overwhelmingly successful participation rate and be a 18 great success, which we always expect and that's what 19 everyone's been working hard towards. + +20 Meanwhile, I agree with Ms. Wang -- and, actually, 21 counsel for Maxwell has said this in a letter to the Court, 22 as well -- that every dollar spent on litigation, which 23 again plaintiffs' counsel in some of the other matters 24 before your Honor have been driving up through, you know, 25 unnecessary motions, unnecessary requests to make discovery + +2 motions, that is money that will never possibly be 3 available to fund the program, which we have been trying to 4 do since day one. You may recall, your Honor, that it was 5 plaintiffs' counsel, different plaintiffs' counsel, who 6 resisted stays of litigation. So, again, I was surprised 7 to hear the comments about cost concerns. + +8 But we agree with where Ms. Wang is at this now, 9 it would be a disservice to claimants and a waste of 10 judicial resources during a time when such resources are, 11 as evidenced by, you know, this conference call, stretched 12 very thin due to the unprecedented situation we find 13 ourselves in with the pandemic, for money to be spent on 14 litigation. It was for that reason that when Ms. Wang 15 approached us, which also bears mentioning that they 16 approached us about this concept of an informal stay, we 17 proposed that we do the same stay that we've done in some 18 of the other actions before your Honor, which if your Honor 19 recalls, those orders -- basically, people can lift them at 20 any time if they decide they don't want to participate in 21 the program or for whatever reason. They can go to your 22 Honor and request a lift of the stay. Ms. Wang didn't 23 agree to that; and, therefore, we, you know, agreed to what 24 was offered, which was this kind of informal stay, followed 25 by a -- + +2 THE COURT: Hold on one second. Did someone join 3 the call? + +4 MALE: Hello. Member of the press here. + +5 THE COURT: Okay. Fine. + +6 I'm sorry, please continue. + +7 MR. MOSKOWITZ: So I was about to wrap up, your + +8 Honor. So, in any event, you know, like I said, I'm + +9 pleased to report that I have confidence the program will + +10 start soon, matter of weeks, not months, finally. And I + +11 agree with the call's concerns, which is that all these + +12 actions to be stayed for people that intend to participate + +13 in the program, which as I understand it, is every + +14 plaintiff in every action that's before your Honor, + +15 including the ones that we're here talking about now. + +16 THE COURT: Okay. So on the deadlines, what + +17 you're looking for -- correct me if I'm wrong on this -- + +18 for fact discovery, you want deadline extension from + +19 July 10 to October 8, is that right? + +20 MS. WANG: I believe that's correct. There's a + +21 letter -- + +22 THE COURT: That's -- II, I'm sorry, I may be + +23 looking at the wrong no, I think so. Yes. That's not a + +24 30-days? + +25 MS. WANG: I apologize, your Honor. This is -- + +2 + +THE COURT: The letter -- I pulled up the letter +in, I think it's the same letter that was written in all +three cases. And it says in the letter that you're looking +for -- █, I'm sorry, you're looking for 90 days. You're +looking for 90 days and an extension -- + +7 + +MS. WANG: That's correct. + +8 + +THE COURT: -- on the answer deadline for 30. + +9 + +MS. WANG: Yes, your Honor. And if I may -- this +10 is plaintiffs' counsel, Mariann Wang, again. The idea was +11 for this informal stay of 30 days and essentially to kind +12 of reassess at that time; and, therefore, we were building +13 in a larger cushion at the back end. + +14 + +And just for the record, for purposes of the +15 record, I just will have to say that I dispute some of the +16 things that Mr. Moskowitz said. But I don't think it's +17 worth going into now. I think there was a lot of effort on +18 the estate's part not to produce any documents or cooperate +19 until it decided that it could put four or five attorneys +20 on this matter. + +21 + +But, in any event, for purposes of what's going on +22 right now, that is correct. The idea was to build in a +23 little bit of extra cushion at the back end. + +24 + +THE COURT: So let me see if I understand this. +25 What you're saying is kick all the deadlines out by 90 + +2 days, discovery deadlines; don't do anything for 30 -- and 3 some time has already passed since you wrote the letter, 4 perhaps you're not even looking at 30 anymore -- and then 5 once those 30 days go by, start up again but at a more 6 leisurely pace because you have another 60 days? + +7 MS. WANG: No, your Honor. The idea would be in 8 30 days we would report back to the Court about what the 9 best approach -- what the best approach would be -- + +10 THE COURT: Let me ask again if someone's joined 11 the line. Has someone joined on the line? Hello? Those 12 beeps might mean someone left or someone joined. + +13 Let me just make sure defense counsel is still 14 present. Mr. Moskowitz? + +15 MR. MOSKOWITZ: I'm here, your Honor, Bennet 16 Moskowitz. + +17 THE COURT: Okay. All right. I haven't set this 18 up with the computer dashboard that identifies people and 19 lets me know who joined and who dropped. We're just doing 20 this as a straight phone call, so that's why I keep asking 21 the questions, to try to figure out who's present in my 22 courtroom, so to speak. If a lawyer who's making an 23 argument suddenly gets up and walks out of the courtroom, 24 that's something I can see; but on the phone call, I have 25 to just make sure that that's not what happened, you know, + +2 through some kind of dropped call or something. + +3 Okay, so you were saying, counsel? I'm sorry. + +4 MS. WANG: Yes, of course. So, your Honor, the 5 idea was really basically a stay for 30 days and then 6 essentially an opportunity to reassess and confer with 7 opposing counsel and basically report to the Court about 8 the next steps of, you know, whether we are going back 9 into, you know, full-on litigation because everything seems 10 to be falling apart in the other -- in the other method of 11 resolution; or if, you know, it would appear that we can go 12 back or we can even enter into a more formal permanent 13 stay. + +14 And to be clear, the reason I didn't like the 15 others -- and which -- and my clients were not amenable to 16 it is that my understanding is and the way it appeared is 17 that those other actions are essentially stays that don't 18 allow to pick up as easily. If your Honor prefers a 19 different method of approach, I'm happy to confer with my 20 clients and opposing counsel and see if there's, you know, 21 a different method of doing this. But the main thing from 22 my clients' perspective is the ability, essentially to, you 23 know, step back into litigation full bore if things are 24 seeming to not go in the right direction. I'm very glad to 25 hear -- it's the first I'm hearing from Mr. Moskowitz, + +2 although I had asked him earlier about, you know, news on 3 the V.I. proceeding I'm glad to hear that there is 4 progress. And this is the first I'm hearing of this 5 June 15 start time. + +6 THE COURT: Okay. So I am still not quite 7 understanding your letter in light of what you're saying, 8 because you wrote the letter May 11. So if I had granted 9 it immediately upon its receipt, your informal stay would 10 have lasted until June 10. And then if what you say is it 11 would have given you an opportunity to report back shortly 12 thereafter -- let's say you would have reported back to me 13 by, say, June 12 or maybe June 15, if not June 10, you're 14 asking for an extension, based on this letter, to submit a 15 joint status report regarding, including, you know, among 16 other things, the progress of settlement discussions, to be 17 extended from June 1 to August 31. August 31 is not in and 18 around the middle of June. + +19 why don't I just kick out the dates by some 20 reasonable period of time from now and ask for a status 21 report by a certain date? And if you find that you still 22 need more time because, you know, things are logistically 23 difficult to get done because of the pandemic or something, 24 you can let me know, and I'll kick out the dates 25 specifically so that you can have a hiatus and save + +2 resources and still have time on the clock to get discovery 3 done if you need it. But some of these dates aren't quite 4 making sense to me, and I'm not sure I'm understanding why 5 the 90 is necessary, why we need more time than the hiatus 6 time. + +7 And if the more time is needed because you're 8 having problems agreeing on whether depositions can proceed 9 by remote means, I'll tell you what I'm telling everyone 10 else in the city of New York who's trying to litigate cases 11 right now, which is learn how to take depositions by remote 12 means. Everybody is learning, and the providers have gone 13 up that learning curve, and things seem to be moving pretty 14 well. I'm not forcing people's hands, but I am strongly 15 urging it. And it seems to be pretty successful. And if 16 you're in that kind of situation where you're trying to 17 negotiate protocol for remote depositions, I can give you a 18 case cite that I've been passing around. The parties don't 19 even know, I'm sure, that I've been passing it around. One 20 of my colleagues sent around a proposed remote deposition 21 protocol that litigants had submitted in a case, didn't 22 bless it, didn't endorse it. There was particular provider 23 mentioned, and certainly the Court's not endorsing any 24 particular provider or anything, but it showed some 25 thought. And I've been passing this citation onto other + +1 PROCEEDINGS 21 2 lawyers as something to glance at as maybe giving rise to 3 ideas and having a basis for discussion. I thought it 4 showed that some time and effort was put into considering 5 the issues that can arise. So let me give you that 6 citation. It's Campus Productions International v. Charter 7 Communication. It's 18-cv-12296. It's a case before Judge 8 Marrero and Magistrate Judge Moses, and it's Docket 51 in 9 that case, 18-cv-12296. Again, I'm not blessing it; I'm 10 just pointing it out as people wrestle with these kinds of 11 concepts. + +12 But so why don't I just extend your deadlines 13 somewhat? It's now already May 22, so I could kick them 14 out to, let's say -- or by 45 days or something like that; 15 ask for a status report by the middle of June; and you'll 16 tell me what's going on. And the reason for me to kick it 17 out is with the understanding that you want to pause 18 things, try to preserve resources, and I'm putting another 19 45 days at the end of the schedule to enable you to get 20 things done. And you can, you know, map out a deposition 21 schedule if you have to for that time. And if you run into 22 logistical problems, you can get back to me and tell me 23 what those logistical problems are. Or maybe even 60. 24 But, you know, what you put out here doesn't seem to quite 25 hold together. + +2 MS. WANG: This is plaintiffs' counsel. Fair 3 enough, your Honor. That makes perfect sense from our 4 perspective. + +5 THE COURT: Okay, look, so here's what I'm going 6 to do. I'm going to move out all deadlines on your 7 scheduling order by 60 days, with the understanding that if 8 for the next, well, until the middle of June when you know 9 if this program is starting, anyway, whatever makes sense, 10 whether it's 30 days or until June 15, you can discuss that 11 between you, for some period of time you're going to hold 12 off on incurring costs. And then, at the end of that point 13 in time, maybe by June -- why don't I just say by June 14 19 -- by June 19, which is the end of that week that starts 15 June 15 -- by June 19, send me a status report, which is 16 either things are going great, we want to stay this longer 17 because we really are participating in this program; or 18 things look grim, it's taken a downturn in the Virgin 19 Islands, and we want to get back on the calendar and we've 20 started talking about that; and because of some logistical 21 issues, we think we need more time or we think we're okay 22 or whatever. But 60 days on the dates, with an 23 understanding that you're going to pause things 24 cooperatively and give me a status report by June 19. 25 Rational? + +2 MS. WANG: Yes, your Honor. Thank you. + +3 THE COURT: Defendants' side? + +4 MR. MOSKOWITZ: That is acceptable to us. Bennet + +5 Moskowitz. Thank you. + +6 THE COURT: Okay. I will issue an order, probably + +7 just a text order on the docket, that will confirm that for + +8 you. I will look at the schedule we have and put firm + +9 dates on that are 60 days out so you have definite dates + +10 for various and assorted things. If some dates have + +11 already gone by, don't worry about it because they'll have + +12 kicked out 60, you know, retroactively. And I am assuming + +13 that neither of you is going to start jumping up and down, + +14 saying this week we must now have depositions happening. I + +15 assume that you're going to wait until approximately + +16 June 15 to see if it's really necessary and report by + +17 June 19. + +18 MR. MOSKOWITZ: Bennet Moskowitz here. We have, + +19 yes, no intention of that, your Honor, and I just -- + +20 THE COURT: I'm sure. + +21 MR. MOSKOWITZ: Yes. Not what I want. + +22 THE COURT: I'm sure. I'm sure. Look, my + +23 intention is to balance things. You know, if there's a + +24 realistic chance of it getting settled, any of these cases + +25 getting settled, that's great. And I don't want you + +2 spending unnecessary funds. But if there are problems with 3 it, I want to keep discovery moving in a rational way, 4 keeping costs reasonably under control, keep you talking, 5 keep you planning. That was the concept all along. And so 6 that's the balancing act. Okay? + +7 MS. WANG: Understood. Thank you, your Honor. + +8 THE COURT: Okay. And I -- + +9 MR. MOSKOWITZ: Thank you, your Honor. + +10 THE COURT: -- realize different cases may be 11 handled somewhat differently with different counsel, and so 12 be it. I was thinking I'd try to get you all more or less 13 on the same track, but there are always going to be some 14 divergences. + +15 Okay. Thank you, all. + +16 MS. WANG: Thank you. + +17 THE COURT: I will talk to at least certain of you 18 again in half an hour. + +21 well. THE COURT: All right. Take care, everybody. Be + +MR. MOSKOWITZ: Thank you. + +(Whereupon, the matter is recessed.) + +# 3 CERTIFICATE + +5 I, Carole Ludwig, certify that the foregoing 6 transcript of proceedings in the case of v. Indyke 7 et al, Docket #19-cv-10788-GHW-DCF, was prepared using 8 digital transcription software and is a true and accurate 9 record of the proceedings. + +13 signature eattale Diuelet + +14 Carole Ludwig + +15 Date: May 29, 2020 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737424/EFTA02737424.metadata.json b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737424/EFTA02737424.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..18f56e56129d5d0b39651a34243540edc6623d4a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737424/EFTA02737424.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,1615 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737424.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 25, + "chars": 28200, + "elapsed_seconds": 16.07, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 242.35200000000003, + 49.41 + ], + [ + 460.8189697265625, + 49.41 + ], + [ + 460.8189697265625, + 75.70416259765625 + ], + [ + 242.35200000000003, + 75.70416259765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PROCEEDINGS BEFORE \nTHE HONORABLE JUDGE DEBRA C. FREEMAN, \nUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MAGISTRATE JUDGE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 188.496, + 281.88 + ], + [ + 522.0338745117188, + 281.88 + ], + [ + 522.0338745117188, + 321.7041931152344 + ], + [ + 188.496, + 321.7041931152344 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "APPEARANCES:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 122.4, + 346.68 + ], + [ + 218.10748291015625, + 346.68 + ], + [ + 218.10748291015625, + 360.70416259765625 + ], + [ + 122.4, + 360.70416259765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "APPEARANCES - CONTINUED:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 121.78800000000001, + 49.41 + ], + [ + 304.8053283691406, + 49.41 + ], + [ + 304.8053283691406, + 62.84210205078125 + ], + [ + 121.78800000000001, + 62.84210205078125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INDEX", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 327.42, + 75.33 + ], + [ + 374.4227600097656, + 75.33 + ], + [ + 374.4227600097656, + 89.1 + ], + [ + 327.42, + 89.1 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXAMINATIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 262.548, + 115.01999999999998 + ], + [ + 433.29599999999994, + 115.01999999999998 + ], + [ + 433.29599999999994, + 128.20416259765625 + ], + [ + 262.548, + 128.20416259765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBITS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 291.924, + 192.77999999999997 + ], + [ + 404.532, + 192.77999999999997 + ], + [ + 404.532, + 206.54999999999998 + ], + [ + 291.924, + 206.54999999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PROCEEDINGS 4", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 293.14799999999997, + 36.45 + ], + [ + 526.48681640625, + 36.45 + ], + [ + 526.48681640625, + 49.08416748046875 + ], + [ + 293.14799999999997, + 49.08416748046875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1 PROCEEDINGS 5", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 102.76000213623047, + 36.16168212890625 + ], + [ + 527.8546752929688, + 36.16168212890625 + ], + [ + 527.8546752929688, + 49.213134765625 + ], + [ + 102.76000213623047, + 49.213134765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1 PROCEEDINGS 6", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 103.19000244140625, + 36.45 + ], + [ + 529.1152954101562, + 36.45 + ], + [ + 529.1152954101562, + 49.213134765625 + ], + [ + 103.19000244140625, + 49.213134765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1 PROCEEDINGS 7", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 102.62000274658203, + 36.45 + ], + [ + 528.1195068359375, + 36.45 + ], + [ + 528.1195068359375, + 49.213134765625 + ], + [ + 102.62000274658203, + 49.213134765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1 PROCEEDINGS 8", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 103.19000244140625, + 36.45 + ], + [ + 528.04638671875, + 36.45 + ], + [ + 528.04638671875, + 49.213134765625 + ], + [ + 103.19000244140625, + 49.213134765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1 PROCEEDINGS 9", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 103.19000244140625, + 36.45 + ], + [ + 529.3253173828125, + 36.45 + ], + [ + 529.3253173828125, + 49.213134765625 + ], + [ + 103.19000244140625, + 49.213134765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1 PROCEEDINGS 10", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 103.19000244140625, + 35.64 + ], + [ + 527.6929321289062, + 35.64 + ], + [ + 527.6929321289062, + 49.213134765625 + ], + [ + 103.19000244140625, + 49.213134765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1 PROCEEDINGS 11", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 10, + "polygon": [ + [ + 103.19000244140625, + 35.64 + ], + [ + 526.8233642578125, + 35.64 + ], + [ + 526.8233642578125, + 49.213134765625 + ], + [ + 103.19000244140625, + 49.213134765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1 PROCEEDINGS 12", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 103.12999725341797, + 35.64 + ], + [ + 528.186767578125, + 35.64 + ], + [ + 528.186767578125, + 49.213134765625 + ], + [ + 103.12999725341797, + 49.213134765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1 PROCEEDINGS 13", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 104.69000244140625, + 35.64 + ], + [ + 529.794921875, + 35.64 + ], + [ + 529.794921875, + 50.713134765625 + ], + [ + 104.69000244140625, + 50.713134765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1 PROCEEDINGS 14", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 13, + "polygon": [ + [ + 103.12999725341797, + 34.83 + ], + [ + 526.919677734375, + 34.83 + ], + [ + 526.919677734375, + 49.213134765625 + ], + [ + 103.12999725341797, + 49.213134765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1 PROCEEDINGS 15", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 100.94000244140625, + 35.64 + ], + [ + 526.022216796875, + 35.64 + ], + [ + 526.022216796875, + 49.08416748046875 + ], + [ + 100.94000244140625, + 49.08416748046875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PROCEEDINGS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 15, + "polygon": [ + [ + 291.924, + 35.64 + ], + [ + 375.76800000000003, + 35.64 + ], + [ + 375.76800000000003, + 47.79 + ], + [ + 291.924, + 47.79 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1 PROCEEDINGS 17", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 102.62000274658203, + 35.64 + ], + [ + 527.9210815429688, + 35.64 + ], + [ + 527.9210815429688, + 49.213134765625 + ], + [ + 102.62000274658203, + 49.213134765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1 PROCEEDINGS 18", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 17, + "polygon": [ + [ + 104.12000274658203, + 35.64 + ], + [ + 529.1043701171875, + 35.64 + ], + [ + 529.1043701171875, + 50.713134765625 + ], + [ + 104.12000274658203, + 50.713134765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1 PROCEEDINGS 19", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 18, + "polygon": [ + [ + 104.12000274658203, + 35.64 + ], + [ + 529.9443969726562, + 35.64 + ], + [ + 529.9443969726562, + 50.713134765625 + ], + [ + 104.12000274658203, + 50.713134765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1 PROCEEDINGS 20", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 103.19000244140625, + 34.83 + ], + [ + 528.006591796875, + 34.83 + ], + [ + 528.006591796875, + 49.213134765625 + ], + [ + 103.19000244140625, + 49.213134765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1 PROCEEDINGS 22", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 21, + "polygon": [ + [ + 103.19000244140625, + 36.45 + ], + [ + 528.5162353515625, + 36.45 + ], + [ + 528.5162353515625, + 49.213134765625 + ], + [ + 103.19000244140625, + 49.213134765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1 PROCEEDINGS 23", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 22, + "polygon": [ + [ + 103.19000244140625, + 36.45 + ], + [ + 528.6244506835938, + 36.45 + ], + [ + 528.6244506835938, + 49.213134765625 + ], + [ + 103.19000244140625, + 49.213134765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1 PROCEEDINGS 24", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 23, + "polygon": [ + [ + 103.19000244140625, + 34.83 + ], + [ + 527.239013671875, + 34.83 + ], + [ + 527.239013671875, + 49.213134765625 + ], + [ + 103.19000244140625, + 49.213134765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "3 CERTIFICATE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 24, + "polygon": [ + [ + 103.55998992919922, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 413.1, + 85.05 + ], + [ + 413.1, + 100.58319091796875 + ], + [ + 103.55998992919922, + 100.58319091796875 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 36 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 21 + ], + [ + "Line", + 11 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 28 + ], + [ + "Line", + 15 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 99 + ], + [ + "Text", + 50 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "Text", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 52 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 48 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 25 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 50 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737424" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737449/EFTA02737449.md b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737449/EFTA02737449.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2222dc98b9c17382e2280767998d79defaeb5f84 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737449/EFTA02737449.md @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +## IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK + +INDYKE. DARREN K. et al. + +) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) + +USA / Plaintiff(s) ) + +v. ) Case No.: 19-cv-10788 + +Defendants) ) + +## NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT + +Notice is hereby given that an official transcript of a TELEPHONE CONFERENCE held on 5/22/2020 has been filed by the court reporter/transcriber in the above-captioned matter. + +Redaction responsibilities apply to the attorneys of record or pro se parties, even if the person requesting the transcript is a judge or a member of the public or media. + +The parties have seven (7) calendar days from the date of filing of this NOTICE to file with the court any NOTICE OF INTENT TO REQUEST REDACTION of this transcript. A copy of said NOTICE must also be served on the court reporter. If no such NOTICE is filed, the transcript may be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after ninety (90) calendar days. + +This process may only be used to redact the following personal data identifiers: Social-Security numbers; dates of birth; minors' names; and financial account numbers. See Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2, and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 49.1. Parties wishing to request redaction of other information may proceed by motion. + +Carole Ludwig + +Court Reporter + +Date: 6/1/2020 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737449/EFTA02737449.metadata.json b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737449/EFTA02737449.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..703ba9ee1a72901be54859a102d4716968050083 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737449/EFTA02737449.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,109 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737449.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1344, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.81, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nFOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 173.19599999999997, + 85.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 438.5828857421875, + 85.85999999999999 + ], + [ + 438.5828857421875, + 114.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 173.19599999999997, + 114.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 165.85200000000003, + 312.65999999999997 + ], + [ + 445.89361572265625, + 312.65999999999997 + ], + [ + 445.89361572265625, + 327.363037109375 + ], + [ + 165.85200000000003, + 327.363037109375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737449" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737450/EFTA02737450.md b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737450/EFTA02737450.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..15cfe13efb05dafd50e6dfd3acb002f7751f769d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737450/EFTA02737450.md @@ -0,0 +1,85 @@ +# EXHIBIT + +# IN THE SUPERIOR COURT TH VIRGIN ISLANDS District of St. /St. John + +In the Matter of the Estate of JEFFREY E. Case Number: ST-2019-PB-00080 EPSTEIN, deceased. Action: Administration of Testamentary Estates + +## NOTICE of ENTRY of ORDER + +To: '= Kroblin, Esq. + +John H. Benham, Esq. + +Douglas B. Chanco, Esq. + +Richard P. Bourne-Vanneck, Esq. + +John K. Dema Esq. + +Denise N. E l Esq. + +Melody D. West all, Esq. + +Sean E al, Esq. + +Gaylin Vog , Esq. + +A. Jeffrey Weiss, Esq. + +Ariel M. Esq. + +Kevin F. D'amour, Esq. + +Kevin Boyle, Esq. + +Robert Glassman, Esq. + +Please take notice that on June 3, 2020 + +#### a(n) ORDER + +dated June 2, 2020 was entered + +by the Clerk in the above-titled matter. + +Dated: June 03, 2020 Tamara Charles + +By: + +Clerk of the Court + +44114 + +Edotcia Hodge Court erk + +## IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. MMI AND ST. JOHN + +IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF: + +JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, + +deceased. ) + +### ORDER + +PROBATE NO. ST-19-PB-80 + +ACTION FOR TESTATE ADMINISTRATION + +THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Co-Executors' Status Report on Voluntary Compensation Program and Presentation of Program Protocol filed on June 1, 2020, wherein, in pertinent part, the Co-Executor notify that all interested parties have finalized and are in support of the protocol for the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program (hereinafter "the Program")) The Court having received testimony concerning the Program at the hearing held on February 4, 2020, and having reviewed said Status Report, it is hereby + +ORDERED that the Expedited Motion for Establishment of a Voluntary Claims Resolution Program filed on November 14, 2019, is GRANTED; and it is further + +ORDERED that the Co-Executors are AUTHORIZED to commence the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program on or about June 15, 2020. + +Dated: June , 2020 + +ATTEST: TAMARA CHARLES Clerk of the Court + +By: 31/-) A EDOTCIA T MAS-HODGE Court Clerk Supervisor 6, / 3 gGI(, + +C ROL P. HER ON- ERCELL Magistrate fudge o the Superid Court of the Virgin Islands + +> CERTIFIE T E COPY DATE 0/4230 TAMARA CHARLES CLERK puz.= BY COURT CLERK + +'At the hearing held on February 4. 2020, while the Court did not allow the Attorney General of the U.S. Virgin Islands to intervene, the Court did request the Co-Executors and the Attorney General to resolve their differences concerning the proposed compensation program. which has garnered the support of all interested parties, including claimants' counsel, The Co-Executors now inform that lb)ecause the need for the Program has grown increasingly urgent, and with the support of claimants' counsel and the USVI Attorney General - and because the remaining impediments have been resolved and the interested parties have consented to the Protocol.- they and the Attorney General have reached an agreement in which the latter will promptly lift previously imposed liens to pay amounts owed for the Program and to begin funding the Program's active operations, including payment of compensation determinations to eligible claimants. Co-Executors' Status Report on Voluntary Compensation Program and Presentation of Program Protocol, at 6. June 1. 2020. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737450/EFTA02737450.metadata.json b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737450/EFTA02737450.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a3d9af0b1652a330c1ff22e1ffe10df13da96c01 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737450/EFTA02737450.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,277 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737450.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 3177, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.44, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "EXHIBIT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 229.5, + 75.33 + ], + [ + 386.82025146484375, + 75.33 + ], + [ + 386.82025146484375, + 113.5496826171875 + ], + [ + 229.5, + 113.5496826171875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE SUPERIOR COURT TH VIRGIN ISLANDS \nDistrict of St. /St. John", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 114.44400000000002, + 73.71000000000001 + ], + [ + 485.12713623046875, + 73.71000000000001 + ], + [ + 485.12713623046875, + 108.53999999999999 + ], + [ + 114.44400000000002, + 108.53999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE of ENTRY \nof \nORDER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 228.276, + 202.5 + ], + [ + 363.57525634765625, + 202.5 + ], + [ + 363.57525634765625, + 250.28999999999996 + ], + [ + 228.276, + 250.28999999999996 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "a(n) ORDER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 115.44876098632812, + 450.36 + ], + [ + 330.0943603515625, + 450.36 + ], + [ + 330.0943603515625, + 463.0252685546875 + ], + [ + 115.44876098632812, + 463.0252685546875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF VIRGIN ISLANDS \nDIVISION OF ST. MMI AND ST. JOHN", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 140.6199951171875, + 77.290283203125 + ], + [ + 450.2817687988281, + 77.290283203125 + ], + [ + 450.2817687988281, + 105.68701171875 + ], + [ + 140.6199951171875, + 105.68701171875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 271.728, + 215.46000000000004 + ], + [ + 319.30389404296875, + 215.46000000000004 + ], + [ + 319.30389404296875, + 229.0670166015625 + ], + [ + 271.728, + 229.0670166015625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 5 + ], + [ + "Line", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 179 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 24 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 104 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737450" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737453/EFTA02737453.md b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737453/EFTA02737453.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..29ba25b143e42ae9eb62dd0ffe5d03958671676a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737453/EFTA02737453.md @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ +Troutman Sanders LLP 875 Third Avenue New York, New York 10022 + +troutman.com + +Bennet J. Moskowitz bennet.moskowitz@troutman.com + +June 3, 2020 + +## VIA ECF + +Hon. Debra . Freeman Daniel Moynihan United States Courthouse 500 Pearl St. New York, NY 10007 + +![](_page_0_Picture_3.jpeg) + +Re: Katlyn Doe, 1:19-cv-07771-PKC-DCF; Priscilla Doe, 1:19-cv-07772-ALC-DCF; Lisa Doe. 1:19-cv-07773 ER-DCF; VE. 1:19-cv-07625-AJN-DCF; ithzt Doe. 1:19-cv-08673-KPF-D . 1:19-cv-10475-LGS-DCF; 1:19-cv-10476-PGG-DCF: 1:19-cv-10479-ALC-DCF; Jane Doe 1000, 1 :19-cv-10577-LGS-D F- Jane Doe 15, 1:19-cv-10653-PAE-DCF; Mary Doe, 1:19-cv-10758-PAE-DCF; 1:19-cv-10788-GHW-DCF; Anastasia Doe, 1:19-cv-11869-AJN-DCF; Jane Doe, 1:20-cv-00484-JGK-DCF + +Dear Judge Freeman: + +We represent Defendants Darren,. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (together, the to -Executors"), in the above-referenced actions. We are pleased to inform the Court that, today, the Superior Court of the United States Virgin Islands entered an order granting the Co-Executors' Motion to establish the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program. A copy of the Order is attached hereto. + +Respectfully submitted, + +/s/ Bennet J. Moskowitz Bennet J. Moskowitz + +cc: Counsel of Record (via ECF) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737453/EFTA02737453.metadata.json b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737453/EFTA02737453.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..06702da2fb042bea189a65b57ea61c2018e51909 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737453/EFTA02737453.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,92 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737453.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1268, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.72, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_0_Picture_3.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "VIA ECF", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 212.22000000000003 + ], + [ + 118.67121887207031, + 212.22000000000003 + ], + [ + 118.67121887207031, + 226.0670166015625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 226.0670166015625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737453" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737453/_page_0_Picture_3.jpeg b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737453/_page_0_Picture_3.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9b5500a617d0d520a5b1803071e4bd873490c605 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737453/_page_0_Picture_3.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:2467063a11c040f04cf9c9352022a8007ffb2fc7dee102dcbf58522e54739560 +size 7419 diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737454/EFTA02737454.md b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737454/EFTA02737454.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8dba2a5ef7ddf770266a7fc6924fd6d2b14197ac --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737454/EFTA02737454.md @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@ +## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK + +Plaintiff; v. DARREN K. INDYKE AND RICHARD D. KAHN AS EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, Defendants. + +Case No. I :19-10788-GHW-DCF + +## JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING ACTION + +WHEREAS independent claims administration experts have designed and are implementing the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program (the "Program") to resolve sexual abuse claims against decedent Jeffrey E. Epstein ("Decedent") in a non-adversarial alternative to litigation; and + +WHEREAS Plaintiff ("Plaintiff," and together with Defendants Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, as Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, the "Parties") seeks to participate in the Program; and + +WHEREAS the Parties seek to preserve their resources and judicial economy by staying this action unless and until Plaintiff elects to resume the litigation and requests the stay be lifted; and + +WHEREAS should Plaintiff resolve her claims against Defendants via the Program, the Parties will thereafter promptly discontinue this action with prejudice. + +IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned counsel for the Parties, that: + +- I. The captioned action is hereby stayed pending further Order of the Court. + +- 2. After the lifting of the stay, if any, the Parties will confer on a schedule for the remaining discovery in this action. + +Dated: June 19, 2020 Respectfully submitted, New York, New York + +CUTI HECKER WANG LLP + +By: Is/ Mariann Meier Wang + +Mariann Meier Wang 305 Broadway, Suite 607 New York, New York 10007 Tel: (212) 620-2603 mwang@chwllp.com + +Attorneys for Plaintiff + +TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP + +By: /s1 Bennet Moskowitz + +Bennet J. Moskowitz 875 Third Avenue New York, NY 10022 (212) 704-6000 bennet.moskowitz@troutman.com + +Attorneys for Defendants + +Date: , 2020 + +New York, New York HON. DEBRA C. FREEMAN United States Magistrate Judge \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737454/EFTA02737454.metadata.json b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737454/EFTA02737454.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0a83cd578c8f53a340a1227748c081ead0d0dfbd --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737454/EFTA02737454.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,159 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737454.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1915, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.8, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 192.78000000000003, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 418.4738464355469, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 418.4738464355469, + 100.10302734375 + ], + [ + 192.78000000000003, + 100.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER STAYING ACTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 111.99600000000001, + 280.26 + ], + [ + 500.2173767089844, + 280.26 + ], + [ + 500.2173767089844, + 296.2330627441406 + ], + [ + 111.99600000000001, + 296.2330627441406 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737454" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737456/EFTA02737456.md b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737456/EFTA02737456.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4a6fe3ec356dd1b6aef70751e6bd77816f39e4c3 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737456/EFTA02737456.md @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@ +## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK + +v. + +DARREN K. INDYKE AND RICHARD D. KAHN AS EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN, + +Defendants. + +Case No. I :19-10788-GHW-DCF + +## JOINT STIPULATION ORDER STAYING ACTION Pt + +WHEREAS independent claims administration experts have designed and are implementing the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program (the "Program") to resolve sexual abuse claims against decedent Jeffrey E. Epstein ("Decedent") in a non-adversarial alternative to litigation; and + +WHEREAS Plaintiff ("Plaintiff," and together with Defendants Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, as Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, the "Parties") seeks to participate in the Program; and + +WHEREAS the Parties seek to preserve their resources and judicial economy by staying this action unless and until Plaintiff elects to resume the litigation and requests the stay be lifted; and + +WHEREAS should Plaintiff resolve her claims against Defendants via the Program, the Parties will thereafter promptly discontinue this action with prejudice. + +IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned counsel for the Parties, that: + +- I. The captioned action is hereby stayed pending further Order of the Court. + +2. After the lifting of the stay, if any, the Parties will confer on a schedule for the remaining discovery in this action. + +Dated: June 19, 2020 Respectfully submitted, New York, New York + +CUTI HECKER WANG LLP + +By: Is/ Mariann Meier Wang Mariann Meier Wang 305 Broadway, Suite 607 New York, New York 10007 Tel: (212) 620-2603 mwang@chwllp.com + +Attorneys for Plaintiff TROUTMAN SANDERS LLP + +By: /s/ Bennet Moskowitz Bennet J. Moskowitz 875 Third Avenue New York, NY 10022 (212) 704-6000 bennet.moskowitz@troutman.com + +Date: June 22 , 2020 New York, New York + +Attorneys for Defendants + +The parties are directed to submit a joint status report no later than 8/14/2020. + +HON. DEBRA e. FREEMAN United States Magistrate Judge \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737456/EFTA02737456.metadata.json b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737456/EFTA02737456.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..45a126cbfa4761b773f4dd52ea191fd5eb29ddd8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737456/EFTA02737456.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,151 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737456.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1980, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.85, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 192.168, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 418.4738464355469, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 418.4738464355469, + 100.10302734375 + ], + [ + 192.168, + 100.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "JOINT STIPULATION ORDER STAYING ACTION Pt", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 111.99600000000001, + 280.26 + ], + [ + 545.292, + 280.26 + ], + [ + 545.292, + 296.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 111.99600000000001, + 296.2330322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 68 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737456" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737458/EFTA02737458.md b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737458/EFTA02737458.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c775fa5874f34eb6e7cecfdf417ad2ba15e4acc0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737458/EFTA02737458.md @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@ +## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK + +Case No. 19-CV-10788-GHW-DCF + +Plaintiff, + +-against- + +DARREN I. INDYKE and RICHARD + +D. KAHN, et al., Defendant. + +## NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS + +TO: ATTORNEY SERVICES CLERK AND ALL OTHER PARTIES + +I have cases pending I have no cases pending + +Pursuant to Local Rule 1.3 of this Court. please take notice of the following attorney information change (s) for: + +Bennet J. Moskowitz + +FILL IN ATTORNEY NAME + +My SDNY Bar Number is: 6M1024 My State Bar Number is 4693842 + +lam. + +An attorney + +A Government Agency attorney + +A Pro Hac Vice attorney + +FIRM INFORMATION (Include full name of firm (OLD AND NEW), address, telephone number and fax number): + +OLD FIRM: FIRM NAME: TroutmanSanders LLP FIRM ADDRESS: 875 Third Avenue New YoncklY 10022 FIRM TELEPHONE NUMBER:212) 704-6000 FIRM FAX NUMBER:SI?)704.6288 + +NEW FIRM: FIRM NAME: Troutman Pepper Sanders LLP FIRM ADDRESS: 875 Third Avenue New York NY 10022\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ FIRM TELEPHONE NUMBER:4212) 704-6000 FIRM FAX NUMBER: (212) 704-6288 + +I will continue to be counsel of record on the above-entitled case at my new firm/agency. + +I am no longer counsel of record on the above-entitled case. An order withdrawing my appearance was entered on by Judge + +Dated: July 9, 2020 s/8en net J. Moskowitz ATTORNEY'S SIGNATURE \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737458/EFTA02737458.metadata.json b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737458/EFTA02737458.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..54cbb67c4a591683aa0e28b4a29f6b6ff035c7d1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737458/EFTA02737458.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,109 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737458.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1316, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.45, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 246.1814727783203, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 246.1814727783203, + 95.48114013671875 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 95.48114013671875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 222.768, + 189.54000000000002 + ], + [ + 387.4317321777344, + 189.54000000000002 + ], + [ + 387.4317321777344, + 201.60113525390625 + ], + [ + 222.768, + 201.60113525390625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 74 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 31 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737458" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737459/EFTA02737459.md b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737459/EFTA02737459.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5ea713ed7b612f86fc7ee173f005c2bfccae4efa --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737459/EFTA02737459.md @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@ +## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK + +Case No. 19-CV-10788•GHW-DCF + +Plaintiff, + +-against- + +DARREN g INDYKE and RICHARD + +D. KAHN, et al., Defendant. + +## NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS + +TO. ATTORNEY SERVICES CLERK AND ALL OTHER PARTIES + +I have cases pending I have no cases pending + +Pursuant to Local Rule 1.3 of this Court• please take notice of the following attorney information change (s) for: + +Mary "Molly" S. Dirago + +FILL IN ATTORNEY NAME + +My SDNY Bar Number is: My State Bar Number is + +I am, + +An attorney + +A Government Agency attorney + +A Pro Hac Vice attorney + +FIRM INFORMATION (Include full name of firm (OLD AND NEW), address, telephone number and fax number): + +OLD FIRM: FIRM NAME: Troutman Sanders LLP FIRM ADDRESS: 227 W. Monroe Street. Suite 3900. Chicago. IL 60606 FIRM TELEPHONE NUMBER:13M 759-1920 FIRM FAX NUMBER: (314 759-1939 + +NEW FIRM: FIRM NAME: Troutman Pepper nanders LLP FIRM ADDRESS: 227 W. Monroe Street. Suite 3900. Chicago. IL 60606 FIRM TELEPHONE NUMBER: (312) 759.1920 FIRM FAX NUMBER: (312) 759-1939 + +I will continue to be counsel of record on the above-entitled case at my new firm/agency. + +I am no longer counsel of record on the above-entitled case. An order withdrawing my appearance was entered on by Judge + +Dated: July 9. 2020 s/Mary "Molly" S. Dirago ATTORNEY'S SIGNATURE \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737459/EFTA02737459.metadata.json b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737459/EFTA02737459.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..770f5b0c7179a73251a626bdf4a209cfdc247041 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737459/EFTA02737459.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,109 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737459.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1329, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.55, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 246.1814727783203, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 246.1814727783203, + 95.48114013671875 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 95.48114013671875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 223.38, + 189.54000000000002 + ], + [ + 387.4317321777344, + 189.54000000000002 + ], + [ + 387.4317321777344, + 201.60113525390625 + ], + [ + 223.38, + 201.60113525390625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Text", + 34 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737459" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737460/EFTA02737460.md b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737460/EFTA02737460.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..79fbd7f96fd4af66ec8114405bd831ae482f64c3 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737460/EFTA02737460.md @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@ +By ECF + +MARIANN MEIER WANG 212.620.2603 To\_ 212.620.2613 FAX + +MWANGOCI4WLLP.COM + +August 14, 2020 + +Hon. Debra Freeman + +U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York + +Daniel Moynihan + +United States Courthouse + +500 Pearl St. + +New York, NY 10007-1312 + +Re: Jane Doe 15 v. Indyke et a/., 19-cv-10653 (PAE)(DCF) + +siMc Doe v. Indyke et al., 19-cv-10758 (PAE)(DCF) v. Indyke et al., 19-cv-10788 (GHW)(DCF) + +Your Honor: + +We represent the plaintiffs in the three above-referenced cases. As directed in Your Honor's Order dated June 22, 2020, we write jointly with counsel for Defendants Darren Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (the "Co-Executors"), to provide a status update. + +These cases were stayed on June 22, 2020 pending the plaintiffs in each of these cases attempting to resolve their claims against the Co-Executors through the Epstein Victims Compensation Program. The plaintiffs are currently in the process of presenting their claims to the administrators of that Program, and the parties remain hopeful that all claims in these matters will be resolved through the Program. Accordingly, all parties believe that these cases should remain stayed at this time. We will notify the Court once the Program has progressed further such that either the claims are resolved or the stays should be lifted. + +We appreciate Your Honor's attention to these matters. + +Very truly yours, + +/s/ Mariann Meier Wang + +Mariann Meier Wang \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737460/EFTA02737460.metadata.json b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737460/EFTA02737460.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..53de60e5888f902781b1a44b68f8b8fa179e49ea --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737460/EFTA02737460.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737460.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1473, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.03, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "CUTI HECKER WANG LLP 305 BROADWAY. SUITE 607", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 75.888, + 36.1195068359375 + ], + [ + 526.3749389648438, + 36.1195068359375 + ], + [ + 526.3749389648438, + 55.4013671875 + ], + [ + 75.888, + 55.4013671875 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 22 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737460" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737461/EFTA02737461.md b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737461/EFTA02737461.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..92b83f114de005c5f3a2c1e462cd67064b1a7cb8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737461/EFTA02737461.md @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +The Clerk of Court of the Southern District of New York is directed to docket the within ORDER in each of the following actions: + +> VE v. Nine East 71st Street et at, No. 1:19-cv-07625 (MN) (DF) Doe I et at v. Indyke et at, No. 1:19-cv-7675 (GBD) (DF) Kadyn Doe v. Indyke et at, No. 1:19-cv-0777 I (PKC) (DF) Priscilla Doe v. Indyke et at, No. 1:19-cv-07772 (ALC) (DF) Lisa Doe v. Indyke et at, No. 1:19-cv-07773 (ER) (DF) Jane Doe v. Indyke a at, No. 1:19-cv-08673 (KPF) (DF) Doe 17 v. Indyke et at, No. 1:19-cv-09610 (PAE) (DF) 11v. Indyke a at, No. 1:19-cv-10475 (LOS) (DF) v. Indyke a at, No. 1:19-cv- 10476 (PGG) (DF) v. Indyke et at, No. 1:19-cv-10479 (ALC) (DF) Jane Doe 1000 v. Indyke a at, No. 1:19-cv-10577 (LOS) (DF) Jane Doe IS v. Indyke et at, No. 1:19-cv-10653 (PAE) (DF) Mae v. Indyke et at, No. 1:19-cv-10758 (PAE) (DF) v. Indyke et at, No. 1:19-cv-10788 (GI-IW) (DF) Anastasia Doe v. Indyke a at, No. 1:19-cv-11869 (MN) (DF) Doe v. htdyke a al., No. 1:20-cv-02365 (LIL) (DF) Doe v. Indyke a at, No. 1:20-cv-2365 (LJL) (DF) + +## DEBRA FREEMAN, United States Magistrate Judge: + +This Court, at the joint request of the parties in each of the above-referenced cases, having issued stays of the proceedings in those cases so that the plaintiffs may pursue the potential settlement of their claims through the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program, it is hereby ORDERED that the parties to each of the referenced cases shall provide this Court with a status report by October 1, 2020, and then, if the matter remains unresolved, by the first day of each month thereafter (or, if the first of the month falls on a weekend or Court holiday, then by the next business day). + +Dated: New York, New York September 4, 2020 + +SO ORDERED + +DEBRA FREEMAN United States Magistrate Judge + +Copies to: All counsel in the above-referenced cases (via ECF) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737461/EFTA02737461.metadata.json b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737461/EFTA02737461.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cfcc5af3483990247edc4fc9c6485f9d420fac63 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737461/EFTA02737461.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737461.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1847, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.52, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "DEBRA FREEMAN, United States Magistrate Judge:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 352.35 + ], + [ + 352.117919921875, + 352.35 + ], + [ + 352.117919921875, + 367.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 367.4830322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 94 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737461" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737462/EFTA02737462.md b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737462/EFTA02737462.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5a91d18d399f7a6a9e869c972554cd8cd0a9c89f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737462/EFTA02737462.md @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@ +MARIANN MEIER WANG 212.620.26037e\_ 212.620.2613 FAX + +NIWANGOCRWLLP.COM + +October 1, 2020 + +By ECF + +Hon. Debra Freeman + +U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York + +Daniel Moynihan + +United States Courthouse + +500 Pearl St. + +New York, NY 10007-1312 + +Re: Jane Doe 15 u. Indyke et al., 19-cv-10653 (PAE)(DCF) + +raiDoe u. Indyke et at, 19-cv-10758 (PAE)(DCF) + +v. Indyke et at, 19-cv-10788 (GHW)(DCF) + +Your Honor: + +We represent the plaintiffs in the three above-referenced cases. As directed in Your Honor's Order dated September 4, 2020, we write jointly with counsel for Defendants Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (the "Co-Executors"), to provide a status update. + +These cases were stayed on June 22, 2020 pending the plaintiffs in each of these cases attempting to resolve their claims against the Co-Executors through the Epstein Victims Compensation Program. The plaintiffs in all three cases have registered their claims with the administrators of the Program and expect soon to submit their complete claims and supporting documents to the administrators. The parties remain hopeful that all claims in these matters will be resolved through the Program. Accordingly, all parties believe that these cases should remain stayed at this time. We will notify the Court once the Program has progressed further such that either the claims are resolved or the stays should be lifted. + +We appreciate Your Honor's attention to these matters. + +Very truly yours, + +/s/ Mariann Meier Wang + +cc: Counsel for Defendants, by ECF \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737462/EFTA02737462.metadata.json b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737462/EFTA02737462.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..448d1bfb419e8a3f0b353a2e14daf57e645b0db3 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737462/EFTA02737462.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,120 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737462.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1576, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.07, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "305BROADWAY. Store CUTI HECKER WANG LLP NEw YORK, NY10007", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 75.276, + 35.36956787109375 + ], + [ + 505.03704833984375, + 35.36956787109375 + ], + [ + 505.03704833984375, + 54.61761474609375 + ], + [ + 75.276, + 54.61761474609375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 7 + ], + [ + "Line", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737462" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737464/EFTA02737464.md b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737464/EFTA02737464.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c25bc5b30dc30915d14e8c790628137d9fa7e266 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737464/EFTA02737464.md @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@ +By ECF + +MARIANN MEIER WANG 212.620.26031EL 212.620.2613 wax + +MWANORCHWLLP.COM + +November 2, 2020 + +Hon. Debra Freeman + +U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York + +Daniel Moynihan + +United States Courthouse + +500 Pearl St. + +New York, NY 10007-1312 + +Re: Jane Doe 15 u. Indyke et al., 19-cv-10653 (PAE)(DCF) + +raiDoe u. Indyke et at, 19-cv-10758 (PAE)(DCF) + +v. Indyke et at, 19-cv-10788 (GHW)(DCF) + +Your Honor: + +We represent the plaintiffs in the three above-referenced cases. As directed in Your Honor's Order dated September 4, 2020, we write jointly with counsel for Defendants Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (the "Co-Executors"), to provide a status update. + +These cases were stayed on June 22, 2020 pending the plaintiffs in each of these cases attempting to resolve their claims against the Co-Executors through the Epstein Victims Compensation Program. The plaintiffs in all three cases have registered their claims with the administrators of the Program, and all three plaintiffs have either submitted or will shortly submit their claims and supporting documents to the administrators. The parties remain hopeful that all claims in these matters will be resolved through the Program. Accordingly, all parties believe that these cases should remain stayed at this time. We will notify the Court once the Program has progressed further such that either the claims are resolved or the stays should be lifted. + +We appreciate Your Honor's attention to these matters. + +Very truly yours, + +/s/ Mariann Meier Wang + +cc: Counsel for Defendants, by ECF \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737464/EFTA02737464.metadata.json b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737464/EFTA02737464.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..496740d7951bb510fe0844f5e35f552d0065a290 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737464/EFTA02737464.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,120 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737464.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1611, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.08, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "CUTI HECKER WANG LLP 305 BROADWAY. SUITE 607", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 75.888, + 35.36956787109375 + ], + [ + 525.5460205078125, + 35.36956787109375 + ], + [ + 525.5460205078125, + 55.0213623046875 + ], + [ + 75.888, + 55.0213623046875 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 7 + ], + [ + "Line", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737464" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737466/EFTA02737466.md b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737466/EFTA02737466.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9a3a1f8853dff288237eccc2b140794c0bd43267 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737466/EFTA02737466.md @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@ +By ECF + +MARIANN MEIER WANG 212.620.260314 212.620.2613 rAx + +MWANORCHWLLP.COM + +December 1, 2020 + +Hon. Debra Freeman + +U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York + +Daniel Moynihan + +United States Courthouse + +500 Pearl St. + +New York, NY 10007-1312 + +Re: Jane Doe 15 u. Indyke et al., 19-cv-10653 (PAE)(DCF) + +Ma Doe u. Indyke et at, 19-cv-10758 (PAE)(DCF) + +v. Indyke et at, 19-cv-10788 (GHW)(DCF) + +Your Honor: + +We represent the plaintiffs in the three above-referenced cases. As directed in Your Honor's Order dated September 4, 2020, we write jointly with counsel for Defendants Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (the "Co-Executors"), to provide a status update. + +These cases were stayed on June 22, 2020 pending the plaintiffs in each of these cases attempting to resolve their claims against the Co-Executors through the Epstein Victims Compensation Program. The plaintiffs in all three cases have registered their claims with the administrators of the Program, and all three plaintiffs have either submitted or will shortly submit their claims and supporting documents to the administrators. The parties remain hopeful that all claims in these matters will be resolved through the Program. Accordingly, all parties believe that these cases should remain stayed at this time. We will notify the Court once the Program has progressed further such that either the claims are resolved or the stays should be lifted. + +We appreciate Your Honor's attention to these matters. + +Very truly yours, + +/s/ Mariann Meier Wang + +cc: Counsel for Defendants, by ECF \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737466/EFTA02737466.metadata.json b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737466/EFTA02737466.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cf4ed2576be2f2c9abdf4c3683068ad0aa2b4bdc --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737466/EFTA02737466.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,120 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737466.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1610, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.07, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "CUTI HECKER WANG LLP 305 BROADWAY. SUITE 607", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 75.888, + 35.36956787109375 + ], + [ + 525.9949340820312, + 35.36956787109375 + ], + [ + 525.9949340820312, + 55.0213623046875 + ], + [ + 75.888, + 55.0213623046875 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 7 + ], + [ + "Line", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737466" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737468/EFTA02737468.md b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737468/EFTA02737468.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b14b4c9d8fffff5f3339212b5bc16c1a72c86275 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737468/EFTA02737468.md @@ -0,0 +1,67 @@ +UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT +SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK + +\_\_\_\_\_ x + +[REDACTED], + +Case No. 19 Civ. 10788 +(GHW)(DCF) + +Plaintiff, + +-against- + +DARREN [REDACTED], INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, +as EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF JEFFREY E. +EPSTEIN, + +Defendants. + +\_\_\_\_\_ x + +**STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE** + +IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties that the +above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed in its entirety with prejudice with each party to +bear its own attorneys' fees and costs pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of +Civil Procedure. + +TROUTMAN PEPPER [REDACTED] +SANDERS, LLP + +*Molly S. DiRago* + +\_\_\_\_\_ +Mary "Molly" S. DiRago +227 W. Monroe Street, Ste. 3900 +Chicago, Illinois 60606 +(312) 759-1920 +molly.dirago@troutman.com + +*Attorneys for Defendants Darren [REDACTED] Indyke +and Richard D. Kahn, Co-Executors of +the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein* + +Dated: December 21, 2020 + +CUTI HECKER WANG LLP + +*Mariann Wang* + +\_\_\_\_\_ +Mariann Meier Wang +305 Broadway, Suite 607 +New York, New York 10007 +(212) 620-2603 +mwang@chwllp.com + +*Attorneys for Plaintiff* + +Dated: December 21, 2020 + +The Clerk of the Court is respectfully requested to close this case. SO ORDERED. + +> GREGORY H. United States District Judge + +Dated: \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737468/EFTA02737468.metadata.json b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737468/EFTA02737468.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ebc6e58fcb126bd0c2bc7401ed32eb3423338d50 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737468/EFTA02737468.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,135 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737468.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1313, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.54, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 279.684, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 279.684, + 98.01 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 98.01 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 162.792, + 305.37 + ], + [ + 446.76, + 305.37 + ], + [ + 446.76, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 162.792, + 319.14000000000004 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Text", + 38 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 11 + ], + [ + "Line", + 6 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02737468" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/ocr-manifest.json b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/ocr-manifest.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6f55eb5a75e2e155715a30e188fa4c5ea3faa63a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/ocr-manifest.json @@ -0,0 +1,1660 @@ +{ + "source_dir": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788", + "output_dir": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788", + "created_at": "2026-09-18T03:57:31.260249+00:00", + "updated_at": "2026-09-18T06:41:45.437785+00:00", + "tasks": { + "20dc9705987a701c735a955cfca9bcd91f911403f7b924eae4f6773b7f1e2877": { + "sha": "20dc9705987a701c735a955cfca9bcd91f911403f7b924eae4f6773b7f1e2877", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737217.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02737217.pdf", + "size": 1211776, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 13, + "chars": 20200, + "elapsed": 1.8852910130517557, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737217/EFTA02737217.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "af968dfdfa7a65966eae5fef71dab9f14f39d3ab22539a538601a311ddc716b6": { + "sha": "af968dfdfa7a65966eae5fef71dab9f14f39d3ab22539a538601a311ddc716b6", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737230.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02737230.pdf", + "size": 345319, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 2, + "chars": 10253, + "elapsed": 61.059672048082575, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737230/EFTA02737230.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "3ba19a8e7c2560d5866b8eb4c7b63b806dd909e458c674a7eafa0d3135b6b08b": { + "sha": "3ba19a8e7c2560d5866b8eb4c7b63b806dd909e458c674a7eafa0d3135b6b08b", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737232.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02737232.pdf", + "size": 135012, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2270, + "elapsed": 1.0291069109225646, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737232/EFTA02737232.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "fc9cae34fbc1d27f80e0be82d4a4ccfc211d6625f76c1c042cf87cfc0f4e32c0": { + "sha": "fc9cae34fbc1d27f80e0be82d4a4ccfc211d6625f76c1c042cf87cfc0f4e32c0", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737234.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02737234.pdf", + "size": 134243, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2268, + "elapsed": 1.039651939063333, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737234/EFTA02737234.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "c00adb306cd1f2644a2ef269ce5b72e29b188b32b9e5ab53895656b1c1c60a1f": { + "sha": "c00adb306cd1f2644a2ef269ce5b72e29b188b32b9e5ab53895656b1c1c60a1f", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737236.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02737236.pdf", + "size": 150966, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2429, + "elapsed": 6.488876568037085, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737236/EFTA02737236.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "2fa6ef6086f17be21dda9020beee8085972c00eeb88037ca3701fe027917e927": { + "sha": "2fa6ef6086f17be21dda9020beee8085972c00eeb88037ca3701fe027917e927", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737238.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02737238.pdf", + "size": 151606, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2287, + "elapsed": 1.09593875403516, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737238/EFTA02737238.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "1742907d2a72bfb86c94ef309fb4bde6b5217c5d2b52e0afa3a341ae046ffcab": { + "sha": "1742907d2a72bfb86c94ef309fb4bde6b5217c5d2b52e0afa3a341ae046ffcab", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737240.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02737240.pdf", + "size": 59981, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 1, + "chars": 804, + "elapsed": 0.962130831903778, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737240/EFTA02737240.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "7aba086d02236769e44163719eaf9bb26b4958936c4c6b74d4e7b4b35efdf976": { + "sha": "7aba086d02236769e44163719eaf9bb26b4958936c4c6b74d4e7b4b35efdf976", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737241.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02737241.pdf", + "size": 60756, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 1, + "chars": 828, + "elapsed": 0.7855952790705487, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737241/EFTA02737241.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "9cc72b31a6ad5afb2c7b02de71700718a5c11044b7b4a22e25f9c154defb8b3f": { + "sha": "9cc72b31a6ad5afb2c7b02de71700718a5c11044b7b4a22e25f9c154defb8b3f", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737242.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02737242.pdf", + "size": 83115, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1195, + "elapsed": 1.0358273800229654, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737242/EFTA02737242.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "17e0b2bfa39276f915e312f5e04bb81b190074e61044e00358d46133ee4bb7a7": { + "sha": "17e0b2bfa39276f915e312f5e04bb81b190074e61044e00358d46133ee4bb7a7", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737243.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02737243.pdf", + "size": 71951, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 1, + "chars": 953, + "elapsed": 0.7673525610007346, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737243/EFTA02737243.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "2e761d0cb044ce1121f0a64687c3460de9bfa5f468e997260c42c46cb83e4802": { + "sha": "2e761d0cb044ce1121f0a64687c3460de9bfa5f468e997260c42c46cb83e4802", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737244.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02737244.pdf", + "size": 94217, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1222, + "elapsed": 13.804973453981802, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737244/EFTA02737244.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "6c91fd0582169ea956563a484bab6eb8ef844ee4757e711f9d9b1055540b6bf7": { + "sha": "6c91fd0582169ea956563a484bab6eb8ef844ee4757e711f9d9b1055540b6bf7", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737245.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02737245.pdf", + "size": 76634, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1018, + "elapsed": 0.7292820640141144, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737245/EFTA02737245.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "182ce85d172a84c18f02e5d8086ab56af6d62244005866b2f7439a1964ace0e2": { + "sha": "182ce85d172a84c18f02e5d8086ab56af6d62244005866b2f7439a1964ace0e2", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737246.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02737246.pdf", + "size": 107387, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1626, + "elapsed": 0.783432835014537, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737246/EFTA02737246.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "8df954c62c140de03d5c387e5237f780dc476f500692f505cb4c3e4e99047982": { + "sha": "8df954c62c140de03d5c387e5237f780dc476f500692f505cb4c3e4e99047982", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737247.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02737247.pdf", + "size": 257261, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 2, + "chars": 3407, + "elapsed": 1.2438233410939574, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737247/EFTA02737247.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "689fda00f869211998e2cca921dee8e3100a0c37effdb81d6e9b22f578c3cf5a": { + "sha": "689fda00f869211998e2cca921dee8e3100a0c37effdb81d6e9b22f578c3cf5a", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737249.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02737249.pdf", + "size": 514583, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 4, + "chars": 8861, + "elapsed": 1.2691448860568926, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737249/EFTA02737249.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "d765b59d20ead18c47214b39a6786de5db5ed24b2217c7d2c54a231c71eef5bd": { + "sha": "d765b59d20ead18c47214b39a6786de5db5ed24b2217c7d2c54a231c71eef5bd", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737253.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02737253.pdf", + "size": 84138, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1271, + "elapsed": 5.802050935104489, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737253/EFTA02737253.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "89befccbdfd75197c9c365c6a0032cbdf7b24daba13e2e3086174a596aa5cba5": { + "sha": "89befccbdfd75197c9c365c6a0032cbdf7b24daba13e2e3086174a596aa5cba5", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737254.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02737254.pdf", + "size": 113199, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1438, + "elapsed": 1.0267671369947493, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737254/EFTA02737254.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "087cfcdc6859d6e52a743aee5e555722f788e1fcb9e36a868e9853b9be588498": { + "sha": "087cfcdc6859d6e52a743aee5e555722f788e1fcb9e36a868e9853b9be588498", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737256.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02737256.pdf", + "size": 229265, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1962, + "elapsed": 8.273231412982568, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737256/EFTA02737256.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "c1ff197e42b22673ee68437125bd4bc8a12253359f5a7c1f5eec3a9173d70ff6": { + "sha": "c1ff197e42b22673ee68437125bd4bc8a12253359f5a7c1f5eec3a9173d70ff6", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737257.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02737257.pdf", + "size": 440783, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 4, + "chars": 6612, + "elapsed": 8.897591249085963, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737257/EFTA02737257.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "ee1e8dac7af2ffd5e24bcaee544d644f59e80fed795bdcc07087909835afd467": { + "sha": "ee1e8dac7af2ffd5e24bcaee544d644f59e80fed795bdcc07087909835afd467", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737261.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02737261.pdf", + "size": 178069, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2546, + "elapsed": 0.968900354928337, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737261/EFTA02737261.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "d9f57beb68377b7a9f4f03efadb32c300d30b8a05ef9281bde492a863bfc29cf": { + "sha": "d9f57beb68377b7a9f4f03efadb32c300d30b8a05ef9281bde492a863bfc29cf", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737263.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02737263.pdf", + "size": 103765, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1403, + "elapsed": 1.0183947529876605, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737263/EFTA02737263.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "4280cfc1e7e78feae01843a6e4f94993cd72e07def8a9f44eedead0e1d5e551a": { + "sha": "4280cfc1e7e78feae01843a6e4f94993cd72e07def8a9f44eedead0e1d5e551a", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737265.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02737265.pdf", + "size": 149413, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1263, + "elapsed": 0.6614219609182328, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737265/EFTA02737265.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "49f7377b96d6406aa6b0344899f3df82fd13d0b17db11ac43bd4f62f00397d7f": { + "sha": "49f7377b96d6406aa6b0344899f3df82fd13d0b17db11ac43bd4f62f00397d7f", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737267.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02737267.pdf", + "size": 101772, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1373, + "elapsed": 0.6983843840425834, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737267/EFTA02737267.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "384637a939fd21ac7e1f9b7ecaf23be47bc75d92ca60797a97079bf4f559be7a": { + "sha": "384637a939fd21ac7e1f9b7ecaf23be47bc75d92ca60797a97079bf4f559be7a", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737269.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02737269.pdf", + "size": 131496, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1413, + "elapsed": 2.4682508329860866, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737269/EFTA02737269.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "2b0c70b2b19f865f31f686b6b800b88d8c31f881d963c9d34db83eec8834c590": { + "sha": "2b0c70b2b19f865f31f686b6b800b88d8c31f881d963c9d34db83eec8834c590", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737271.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02737271.pdf", + "size": 79486, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1185, + "elapsed": 0.8127782210940495, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737271/EFTA02737271.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "90dcafda719bc337b9041c4d9aa1bbca8e97e6bb5367847c763c27c0b9027de6": { + "sha": "90dcafda719bc337b9041c4d9aa1bbca8e97e6bb5367847c763c27c0b9027de6", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737272.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02737272.pdf", + "size": 126645, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1441, + "elapsed": 0.9928126870654523, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737272/EFTA02737272.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "08dc5e068b80904ad6717ed02a99ba817ca3f60a08b683cc77036862562ec82e": { + "sha": "08dc5e068b80904ad6717ed02a99ba817ca3f60a08b683cc77036862562ec82e", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737273.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02737273.pdf", + "size": 74370, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1011, + "elapsed": 0.6948631659615785, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737273/EFTA02737273.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "3d3382b1b287ee5299da377a4061561d378474e049b8cf2772e7c4f9c3a3b88b": { + "sha": "3d3382b1b287ee5299da377a4061561d378474e049b8cf2772e7c4f9c3a3b88b", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737274.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02737274.pdf", + "size": 1329695, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 14, + "chars": 25975, + "elapsed": 1.9139139540493488, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737274/EFTA02737274.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "a7954aa3cb497f74cfcc51c4a16d019f8fdab59c99f76bb343a1f4aa4f2043d9": { + "sha": "a7954aa3cb497f74cfcc51c4a16d019f8fdab59c99f76bb343a1f4aa4f2043d9", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737288.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02737288.pdf", + "size": 1089870, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 12, + "chars": 18832, + "elapsed": 1.3707479930017143, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737288/EFTA02737288.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "64eb93609e141362692c29ae66f4843e05ada01b935756c48dae3808b0c0d82b": { + "sha": "64eb93609e141362692c29ae66f4843e05ada01b935756c48dae3808b0c0d82b", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737300.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02737300.pdf", + "size": 102562, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1295, + "elapsed": 0.9877549270167947, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737300/EFTA02737300.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "bfa3197f2b3ba93d75b2eae71a3178cffac235af159ed005ae5f22dafcbceb7f": { + "sha": "bfa3197f2b3ba93d75b2eae71a3178cffac235af159ed005ae5f22dafcbceb7f", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737301.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02737301.pdf", + "size": 76141, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1656, + "elapsed": 8.580059510073625, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737301/EFTA02737301.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "f6c310ed02175230f6b4fc5dc479a50933d482e1c97ae9c24d0df7a156031808": { + "sha": "f6c310ed02175230f6b4fc5dc479a50933d482e1c97ae9c24d0df7a156031808", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737302.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02737302.pdf", + "size": 2957586, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 12, + "chars": 29343, + "elapsed": 13.29419006803073, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737302/EFTA02737302.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "f3228c4261ec27c202e510c4a7090a3681a6a6fac03d0a99a337ea8234e291aa": { + "sha": "f3228c4261ec27c202e510c4a7090a3681a6a6fac03d0a99a337ea8234e291aa", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737314.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02737314.pdf", + "size": 6314564, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 55, + "chars": 93061, + "elapsed": 17.541883228928782, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737314/EFTA02737314.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "1b9fcb1d1ae1e20eecdf2e680e8ebd0c0f146d740535082e3c276a23d711780a": { + "sha": "1b9fcb1d1ae1e20eecdf2e680e8ebd0c0f146d740535082e3c276a23d711780a", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737369.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02737369.pdf", + "size": 137596, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1631, + "elapsed": 7.375058396020904, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737369/EFTA02737369.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "cc6da2de338f1f9e43564220864cd847b2f4110a4874115f58755f9682ecda7c": { + "sha": "cc6da2de338f1f9e43564220864cd847b2f4110a4874115f58755f9682ecda7c", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737371.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02737371.pdf", + "size": 92266, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1400, + "elapsed": 0.6481541759567335, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737371/EFTA02737371.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "01570e7102277ae6da2473e7c7a44710099e342af3d0189d9d06d471a797be2d": { + "sha": "01570e7102277ae6da2473e7c7a44710099e342af3d0189d9d06d471a797be2d", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737373.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02737373.pdf", + "size": 1621950, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 16, + "chars": 29321, + "elapsed": 2.2186650820076466, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737373/EFTA02737373.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "5e9574731fffc5d901cd30802869e64c7f10e1b64747ccdea07e9280fc66fe01": { + "sha": "5e9574731fffc5d901cd30802869e64c7f10e1b64747ccdea07e9280fc66fe01", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737389.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02737389.pdf", + "size": 407069, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 3, + "chars": 6148, + "elapsed": 10.884682676987723, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737389/EFTA02737389.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "97087d08ac8fc5ec900de5c6a7ac9d5f121c47130960ae89a7b7cd3a44a3c311": { + "sha": "97087d08ac8fc5ec900de5c6a7ac9d5f121c47130960ae89a7b7cd3a44a3c311", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737392.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02737392.pdf", + "size": 496737, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 3, + "chars": 8968, + "elapsed": 12.577242100029252, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737392/EFTA02737392.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "5de863cee795b0ea91f1df76f086e3848aac37a255d758ec988eeab096043f80": { + "sha": "5de863cee795b0ea91f1df76f086e3848aac37a255d758ec988eeab096043f80", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737395.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02737395.pdf", + "size": 132014, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1867, + "elapsed": 0.6602043480379507, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737395/EFTA02737395.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "8168b1a34fb57f7c1b1568e1e3ea5b877ca8f903c96b32e8f93ac2aadfdc8fc5": { + "sha": "8168b1a34fb57f7c1b1568e1e3ea5b877ca8f903c96b32e8f93ac2aadfdc8fc5", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737397.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02737397.pdf", + "size": 144184, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1966, + "elapsed": 0.7103242040611804, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737397/EFTA02737397.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "f7d2f9216af0598218bf0ae60ee895f7cedc01e91f7412ad03ee159f5769efe2": { + "sha": "f7d2f9216af0598218bf0ae60ee895f7cedc01e91f7412ad03ee159f5769efe2", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737399.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02737399.pdf", + "size": 1947917, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 17, + "chars": 32250, + "elapsed": 3.036492277053185, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737399/EFTA02737399.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "cc7825b1b474c63312797c861652b961c81ea61f8d16cfe49fe6075c583d0007": { + "sha": "cc7825b1b474c63312797c861652b961c81ea61f8d16cfe49fe6075c583d0007", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737416.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02737416.pdf", + "size": 79787, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1122, + "elapsed": 0.7051228969357908, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737416/EFTA02737416.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "f7577010ac0d2d482e71f59dbdcb6349f2601f629977beb1157b5c7772950f95": { + "sha": "f7577010ac0d2d482e71f59dbdcb6349f2601f629977beb1157b5c7772950f95", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737417.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02737417.pdf", + "size": 376292, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 4, + "chars": 5947, + "elapsed": 0.9330205160658807, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737417/EFTA02737417.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "fe5677ba4d5b709fe84949c70c8d8eff14b829849501bb43b8e411a7fa48a99d": { + "sha": "fe5677ba4d5b709fe84949c70c8d8eff14b829849501bb43b8e411a7fa48a99d", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737421.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02737421.pdf", + "size": 79932, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1131, + "elapsed": 0.7190041079884395, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737421/EFTA02737421.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "d66a4947c6ff086ac07febd1d5f8d8da77340850f22fce178c661463752b7a6a": { + "sha": "d66a4947c6ff086ac07febd1d5f8d8da77340850f22fce178c661463752b7a6a", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737422.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02737422.pdf", + "size": 263331, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 2, + "chars": 3945, + "elapsed": 8.40500876295846, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737422/EFTA02737422.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "2e075997a0e7478f2682416b2cfebb62ac38799c901353ee5494f13d7e6af7e1": { + "sha": "2e075997a0e7478f2682416b2cfebb62ac38799c901353ee5494f13d7e6af7e1", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737424.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02737424.pdf", + "size": 1922277, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 25, + "chars": 28200, + "elapsed": 16.065894301980734, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737424/EFTA02737424.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "4d6df91683bfbfcb88a063e3d2de9c756cc951952dc8594c8caa653ee80c3c5a": { + "sha": "4d6df91683bfbfcb88a063e3d2de9c756cc951952dc8594c8caa653ee80c3c5a", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737449.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02737449.pdf", + "size": 86138, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1344, + "elapsed": 0.8145417110063136, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737449/EFTA02737449.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "a45b7358d5da2a2c7d43d12f5675494aeca3d56c5025d5d04e463da5f653a0b2": { + "sha": "a45b7358d5da2a2c7d43d12f5675494aeca3d56c5025d5d04e463da5f653a0b2", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737450.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02737450.pdf", + "size": 261817, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 3, + "chars": 3177, + "elapsed": 1.4405375430360436, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737450/EFTA02737450.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "c82dc7e53476af091ba040faa6f6dabd481e9db3a2a227c3e688d92bb7a23a2b": { + "sha": "c82dc7e53476af091ba040faa6f6dabd481e9db3a2a227c3e688d92bb7a23a2b", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737453.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02737453.pdf", + "size": 87462, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1268, + "elapsed": 0.715851736953482, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737453/EFTA02737453.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "a593442b60e558b48cc844706ea752ac971e2c570a1de85a4cb9bce16c4051f4": { + "sha": "a593442b60e558b48cc844706ea752ac971e2c570a1de85a4cb9bce16c4051f4", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737454.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02737454.pdf", + "size": 137358, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1915, + "elapsed": 0.795957537018694, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737454/EFTA02737454.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "4ebe887e42873127a7f07850c272398223ae3512519097065f6e7fd727372e88": { + "sha": "4ebe887e42873127a7f07850c272398223ae3512519097065f6e7fd727372e88", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737456.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02737456.pdf", + "size": 147571, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1980, + "elapsed": 0.8497234610840678, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737456/EFTA02737456.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "1d22020acf36c64f4cc6a78aaf1146c15218285144f680bddf751d076973de12": { + "sha": "1d22020acf36c64f4cc6a78aaf1146c15218285144f680bddf751d076973de12", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737458.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02737458.pdf", + "size": 77643, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1316, + "elapsed": 1.4535409320378676, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737458/EFTA02737458.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "dd7717af7ea6166858c92975b57f7a0692ae6e4d44ea524f5223ab68d519dd80": { + "sha": "dd7717af7ea6166858c92975b57f7a0692ae6e4d44ea524f5223ab68d519dd80", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737459.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02737459.pdf", + "size": 77256, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1329, + "elapsed": 1.5515821919543669, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737459/EFTA02737459.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "ccc962d01dde8d9d9894988bf6ba1a6c8eb25e8e3aa578895f9e8bb05b26c5a5": { + "sha": "ccc962d01dde8d9d9894988bf6ba1a6c8eb25e8e3aa578895f9e8bb05b26c5a5", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737460.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02737460.pdf", + "size": 108839, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1473, + "elapsed": 1.0326473650056869, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737460/EFTA02737460.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "e47cb950b2a3e32bcc40f063efd9db92e2b1ef882188bc957181f553f5b8b0d8": { + "sha": "e47cb950b2a3e32bcc40f063efd9db92e2b1ef882188bc957181f553f5b8b0d8", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737461.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02737461.pdf", + "size": 113898, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1847, + "elapsed": 0.5180402130354196, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737461/EFTA02737461.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "0e509fef465933f092a95b28c4d64d3511a0d3393a04e5f9e5f5a7fc56a46bbd": { + "sha": "0e509fef465933f092a95b28c4d64d3511a0d3393a04e5f9e5f5a7fc56a46bbd", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737462.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02737462.pdf", + "size": 125109, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1576, + "elapsed": 1.0744423089781776, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737462/EFTA02737462.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "ba1e9ac0afe6b5e825bd320b77aba6622c748242abdb5ce9651374e350c24455": { + "sha": "ba1e9ac0afe6b5e825bd320b77aba6622c748242abdb5ce9651374e350c24455", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737464.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02737464.pdf", + "size": 127394, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1611, + "elapsed": 1.078440301003866, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737464/EFTA02737464.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "6e7e31164135567c0b37aef738e027ef9e097ce18f8486c2218779f9e3a234f8": { + "sha": "6e7e31164135567c0b37aef738e027ef9e097ce18f8486c2218779f9e3a234f8", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737466.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02737466.pdf", + "size": 127284, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1610, + "elapsed": 1.0670185229973868, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737466/EFTA02737466.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "6e66a865014c6d16cd88edf2e31a5a0402ae2badc32f031501e671beb1b52437": { + "sha": "6e66a865014c6d16cd88edf2e31a5a0402ae2badc32f031501e671beb1b52437", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737468.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02737468.pdf", + "size": 86919, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 2, + "chars": 1313, + "elapsed": 5.535880520939827, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10788/EFTA02737468/EFTA02737468.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + } + } +} \ No newline at end of file