robbd commited on
Commit
b242273
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): abfb85d

MEMY-1805 marker2 court-redacted-v-indyke-10476 (salt 4090): 152/152

Browse files
This view is limited to 50 files because it contains too many changes.   See raw diff
Files changed (50) hide show
  1. marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819086/EFTA02819086.md +345 -0
  2. marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819086/EFTA02819086.metadata.json +1720 -0
  3. marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819115/EFTA02819115.md +137 -0
  4. marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819115/EFTA02819115.metadata.json +220 -0
  5. marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819117/EFTA02819117.md +63 -0
  6. marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819117/EFTA02819117.metadata.json +170 -0
  7. marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819119/EFTA02819119.md +94 -0
  8. marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819119/EFTA02819119.metadata.json +176 -0
  9. marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819119/_page_0_Picture_136.jpeg +3 -0
  10. marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819121/EFTA02819121.md +23 -0
  11. marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819121/EFTA02819121.metadata.json +109 -0
  12. marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819122/EFTA02819122.md +49 -0
  13. marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819122/EFTA02819122.metadata.json +151 -0
  14. marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819124/EFTA02819124.md +94 -0
  15. marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819124/EFTA02819124.metadata.json +367 -0
  16. marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819124/_page_2_Picture_60.jpeg +3 -0
  17. marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819129/EFTA02819129.md +31 -0
  18. marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819129/EFTA02819129.metadata.json +139 -0
  19. marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819131/EFTA02819131.md +30 -0
  20. marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819131/EFTA02819131.metadata.json +132 -0
  21. marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819132/EFTA02819132.md +29 -0
  22. marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819132/EFTA02819132.metadata.json +120 -0
  23. marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819134/EFTA02819134.md +55 -0
  24. marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819134/EFTA02819134.metadata.json +134 -0
  25. marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819134/_page_0_Picture_15.jpeg +3 -0
  26. marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819136/EFTA02819136.md +61 -0
  27. marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819136/EFTA02819136.metadata.json +245 -0
  28. marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819140/EFTA02819140.md +57 -0
  29. marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819140/EFTA02819140.metadata.json +269 -0
  30. marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819143/EFTA02819143.md +31 -0
  31. marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819143/EFTA02819143.metadata.json +121 -0
  32. marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819144/EFTA02819144.md +99 -0
  33. marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819144/EFTA02819144.metadata.json +350 -0
  34. marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819149/EFTA02819149.md +55 -0
  35. marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819149/EFTA02819149.metadata.json +136 -0
  36. marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819151/EFTA02819151.md +163 -0
  37. marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819151/EFTA02819151.metadata.json +507 -0
  38. marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819151/_page_5_Picture_2.jpeg +3 -0
  39. marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819159/EFTA02819159.md +25 -0
  40. marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819159/EFTA02819159.metadata.json +120 -0
  41. marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819161/EFTA02819161.md +31 -0
  42. marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819161/EFTA02819161.metadata.json +72 -0
  43. marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819161/_page_0_Picture_3.jpeg +3 -0
  44. marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819162/EFTA02819162.md +37 -0
  45. marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819162/EFTA02819162.metadata.json +72 -0
  46. marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819162/_page_0_Picture_3.jpeg +3 -0
  47. marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819163/EFTA02819163.md +23 -0
  48. marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819163/EFTA02819163.metadata.json +109 -0
  49. marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819164/EFTA02819164.md +23 -0
  50. marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819164/EFTA02819164.metadata.json +109 -0
marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819086/EFTA02819086.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,345 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
2
+
3
+ Plaintiff, CASE NO:
4
+
5
+ v.
6
+
7
+ DARREN K. INDYICE and RICHARD D. KAHN, in their capacities as the executors of the ESTATE OF JEFFREY EDWARD EPSTEIN,
8
+
9
+ Defendants.
10
+
11
+ # COMPLAINT
12
+
13
+ Bows SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP
14
+
15
+ Plaintiff , by her attorneys Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, for her Complaint against Defendants, Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn in their capacities as the executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Edward Epstein ("Epstein"), avers upon personal knowledge as to her own acts and status and upon information and belief and to all other matters as follows:
16
+
17
+ ### NATURE OF THE ACTION
18
+
19
+ - I. This suit arises out of Jeffrey Epstein's sexual abuse of Plaintiff.
20
+ - 2. Teresa was sexually trafficked by Epstein, , and Ghislaine Maxwell as part of Epstein's organized ring of procuring young women for sex. She was recruited by a woman who worked for Epstein and who offered Teresa the opportunity to become a traveling masseuse. As Teresa was studying massage at the California Healing Arts College, this seemed like a dream opportunity, but her hopes were dashed when it quickly turned into sexual assault.
21
+ - 3. Epstein's trafficking scheme involved recruiting young females by making false promises and using his wealth, power and threats to intimidate the females into submission to his demands. This same pattern was repeated numerous times with numerous young women.
22
+ - 4. As United States District Judge Kenneth Marra found, "From between about 1999 and 2007, Jeffrey Epstein sexually abused more than 30 minor girls . . . at his mansion in Palm Beach Florida, and elsewhere in the United States and overseas. . . . In addition to his own sexual abuse of the victims, Epstein directed other persons to abuse the girls sexually. Epstein used paid employees to find and bring minor girls to him. Epstein worked in concert with others to obtain minors not only for his own sexual gratification, but also for the sexual gratification of others." Doe 1 v. United States, 359 F. Supp. 3d 1201, 1204 (S.D. Fla. 2019) (internal citations omitted).
23
+
24
+ 5. Epstein organized this sex trafficking network to obtain hundreds of young females for himself for sex, and also lent these females out to other powerful and wealthy individuals to be sexually abused.
25
+
26
+ 6. Epstein conspired with others and hired staff to maintain and keep secret this network of sexual abuse for years, which sprawled throughout Epstein's residences in New York, Florida, New Mexico, the United States Virgin Islands, and Paris. Epstein's preference was to have three different young females a day for his sexual pleasure.
27
+
28
+ 7. Despite his significant criminal activity, in 2008 Epstein received a shockingly minimal charge, pleading guilty to a single Florida state law charge of procuring a minor for prostitution and a non-prosecution agreement (a "NPA") with the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida. Unknown to the public and the victims at the time, Epstein's lawyers were pressuring the Government to commit to the NPA without informing the victims. Epstein's multiple victims were kept in the dark and told to be "patient" while Epstein's lawyers worked to protect him and other potential co-conspirators from prosecution. Epstein served one year in jail, but was afforded the privilege of being able to leave the jail to go to work for twelve hours per day, six days per week.
29
+
30
+ 8. The NPA allowed Epstein to escape proportionate punishment for his actions and to continue operating his sex trafficking enterprise with liberty.
31
+
32
+ 9. A few years later, Epstein flippantly referred to his sexual abuse of multiple minors, and the slap on the wrist he had received for it, in a 2011 interview with the New York Post: "Billionaire pervert Jeffrey Epstein is back in New York City — and making wisecracks about his just-ended jail stint for having sex with an underage girl. 'I am not a sexual predator, I'm an offender,' the financier told The Post yesterday. 'It's the difference between a murderer and a
33
+
34
+ person who steals a bagel,' said Epstein." Amber Sutherland, Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein: I'm a Sex Offender Not a Predator, N.Y. Post (Feb. 25, 2011),
35
+
36
+ https://nypost.com/2011/02/25/billionaire-jeffrey-epstein-im-a-sex-offender-not-a-predatort
37
+
38
+ 10. In August 2018, just one year before his death, Epstein told a New York Times reporter "that criminalizing sex with teenage girls was a cultural aberration and that at times in history it was perfectly acceptable." James B. Stewart, The Day Jeffrey Epstein Told Me He Had Dirt on Powerful People, N.Y. Times (Aug. 12, 2019),
39
+
40
+ https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/12/business/jeffrey-epstein-interview.html.
41
+
42
+ II. When Plaintiff was 22 years old, Epstein added her to his long list of victims by committing sexual assault and battery against her. As such, Epstein is responsible for battery and intentional infliction of emotional distress pursuant to New York common law. The damage to Plaintiff has been severe and lasting.
43
+
44
+ 12. This action has been timely filed pursuant to N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 215(8)(a), which provides that a plaintiff shall have at least one year from the termination of a criminal action against the same defendant to commence an action with respect to the event or occurrence from which the criminal action arose. A criminal action against Epstein with respect to the same sex trafficking enterprise from which Plaintiff's claims arise was terminated on August 29, 2019.
45
+
46
+ 13. Any statute of limitations applicable to Plaintiff's claims, if any, is tolled due to the continuous and active deception, duress, threats of retaliation, and other forms of misconduct that Epstein and his co-conspirators used to silence his many victims, including Plaintiff. Epstein's actions deprived Plaintiff of the opportunity to commence this lawsuit before his death. Until his death, Plaintiff feared that Epstein and his co-conspirators would harm her or her family, or ruin her life, if she came forward.
47
+
48
+ 14. Defendants are equitably estopped from asserting a statute of limitations defense. Allowing Defendants to do so would be unjust. Epstein and his co-conspirators intimidated each of his victims into silence by threatening their lives and their livelihoods. They therefore prevented Plaintiff from commencing this lawsuit before his death. By using threats, along with his wealth and power, Epstein was able to escape punishment for his intolerable and brutal crimes against countless young women and underage girls for the duration of his life.
49
+
50
+ ## PARTIES
51
+
52
+ 15. Plaintiff is a citizen and resident of Ohio.
53
+
54
+ 16. Defendant Darren K. Indyke is sued in his capacity as an appointed executor of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein.
55
+
56
+ 17. Defendant Richard D. Kahn is sued in his capacity as an appointed executor of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein.
57
+
58
+ # JURISDICTION AND VENUE
59
+
60
+ 18. Jeffrey Epstein was a citizen of the United States domiciled in the U.S. Virgin Islands at the time of his death. Jeffrey Epstein maintained a residence in the Southern District of New York. As the legal representatives of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn are deemed citizens of the U.S. Virgin Islands.
61
+
62
+ 19. The amount in controversy in this action exceeds the sum or value of \$75,000.00 excluding interests and costs and is between citizens of different states. Accordingly, jurisdiction is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1332.
63
+
64
+ 20. Venue is proper in this Court as Epstein's sexual abuse of Plaintiff occurred in New York, New York, where he recruited her at the age of 22, physically molested her, and began grooming her for sex in his organized sex trafficking ring.
65
+
66
+ 21. Many of the events giving rise to these causes of action occurred in the Southern District of New York, where a substantial amount of Epstein's property is located. Thus, venue in this district is proper. 28 U.S.C. § 1391(6)(2).
67
+
68
+ ## FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
69
+
70
+ ## A. Epstein's Sex Trafficking Enterprise
71
+
72
+ 22. Jeffrey Epstein was widely renowned as a billionaire who used his vast connections to powerful individuals, and seemingly unlimited wealth and resources, to create a web of transcontinental sex trafficking that served himself, his co-conspirators, and some of the most powerful people in the world.
73
+
74
+ 23. Epstein owned multiple residences and frequently travelled between them, including at 9 East 71" Street, New York, New York 10021, where the illegal sexual crimes against Plaintiff occurred. Epstein conservatively valued his New York townhome at \$55,931,000.00. Epstein conservatively valued his ranch at 49 Zorro Ranch Road, Stanley, New Mexico 87056, at \$17,246,208.00. In addition, Epstein owned residences in the Virgin Islands, Florida, France, and even on his own island, Great St. James Island, where his transcontinental sex trafficking of hundreds of young females servicing him, his co-conspirators, and wealthy and powerful individuals around the world occurred.
75
+
76
+ 24. The allegations herein concern Epstein's tortious acts against Plaintiff while in New York, where Epstein was staying at his 71' Street mansion.
77
+
78
+ 25. At all times material to this cause of action, Jeffrey Epstein utilized his seemingly unlimited power, wealth, and resources, as well as his deep connections to powerful and politically connected individuals to intimidate and manipulate his victims of sexual abuse. 26. Epstein and his co-conspirators had perfected a scheme for manipulation and abuse of young females. As part of the scheme, a female "recruiter" would approach a young female and strike up a conversation in an effort to quickly learn about the young female's background and any vulnerabilities they could expose. The recruiter would then manipulate the young female into coming back to one of Epstein's residences by offering the young female something she needed. At times the recruiter's lure would be a modeling opportunity, money for education, help for the young female's family, and a whole host of other related offers depending on their target's situation. Once in the residence, the recruiter and Epstein would work in concert to impress and intimidate the young female with displays of vast wealth, including having employees that were butlers and maids formally dressed around the house. They would also strategically place photographs of very powerful political and social figures amongst photographs and art displaying nude females in an effort to normalize the sexual abuse. They would also normalize the sexual abuse by placing a massage table and spa related products around the massage area in an effort to legitimize the area where the abuse was set to occur. Once abused, Epstein and his co-conspirators continued to manipulate the victims, using their financial power, promises, and threats to ensure that the victim returned as directed and remained compliant with their demands.
79
+
80
+ ## B. The Arrest. Prosecution, and Death of Epstein
81
+
82
+ 27. The sexual trafficking ring described herein started at least as early as 1995 and continued up until at least July 2, 2019, when the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York ("SDNY") charged Epstein with sex trafficking conspiracy and sex trafficking in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1591. He was arrested on July 8, 2019, pursuant to the SDNY's Sealed Two Count Indictment, which is attached as Exhibit A.
83
+
84
+ 28. The Indictment described Epstein's conduct and his abuse and trafficking of females in the same trafficking operation he used to abuse and traffic Plaintiff.
85
+
86
+ 29. Epstein's last will and testament (the "Will") was executed on August 8, 2019, at the Metropolitan Correctional Center. The witnesses were Martel Colon Miro and Gulnora Tali. The Will included affidavits from Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, in which they swear an "Oath of Willingness to Serve as Executor and Appointment of Local Counsel."
87
+
88
+ 30. Epstein was found dead in his cell at the Metropolitan Correctional Center on August 10, 2019.
89
+
90
+ 31. Epstein's last will and testament was filed on August 15, 2019, in the Probate Division of the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands.
91
+
92
+ 32. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn filed a Certificate of Trust in the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands for Epstein's 1953 Trust on August 26, 2019. See Certificate of Trust, In the Matter of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, Probate No. ST-19-PB-80 (Super. Ct. V.I. Aug. 26, 2019).
93
+
94
+ 33. Epstein's will was entered into probate on September 6, 2019, and the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands accordingly authorized Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn to administer Epstein's estate. See Order for Probate, In the Matter of the Estate ofJeffrey E. Epstein, Probate No. ST-19-PB-80 (Super. Ct. V.I. Sept. 6, 2019); Letters Testamentary, In the Matter of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, Probate No. ST-19-PB-80 (Super. Ct. V.I. Sept. 6, 2019).
95
+
96
+ 34. The Will's first article directs Epstein's executors "to pay from my estate all expenses of my last illness, my funeral and burial expenses, the administration expenses of my estate and all of my debts duly proven and allowed against my estate." The Will further directs that "after the
97
+
98
+ payments and distributions provided in Article FIRST," Epstein "give[s] all of my property, real and personal, wherever situated ... to the then acting Trustees of The 1953 Trust."
99
+
100
+ 35. Following Epstein's death, SDNY submitted a proposed nolle prosequi order in the criminal matter against him because it was required by law to do so after Epstein was deceased. On August 29, 2019, U.S. District Judge Richard Berman formally dismissed SDNY's indictment against Epstein, terminating the criminal action against him. Plaintiff's claims are therefore timely under N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 215(8Xa).
101
+
102
+ C.
103
+
104
+ 36. In or around September 2002, Teresa was 22 years old and living in Santa Monica, California. She was working towards obtaining her certificate in massage therapy at the California Healing Arts College. A fellow massage therapy student approached Teresa and asked her if she would be interested in a traveling masseuse position. The student explained to Teresa that the position involved traveling around the world on a private jet with a wealthy couple. Teresa expressed interest.
105
+
106
+ 37. The student arranged for Teresa to meet an employee of the couple at Santa Monica beach. That woman was one of Epstein's co-conspirators and recruiters.
107
+
108
+ 38. Teresa and discussed the position for about an hour. made the job sound like a dream, explaining that Teresa would be working for a highly educated and worldly couple in New York with their own private jet. told Teresa that she would be taken to lavish parties, receive expensive clothes, travel all over the world in luxury, and receive the best education available all around the world.
109
+
110
+ 39. About two weeks after her initial interview with MB told Teresa that the couple wanted to fly her to New York for another interview. The couple bought her a ticket for a flight from California to New York City.
111
+
112
+ 40. When she arrived, a driver brought Teresa to an apartment building in Manhattan, where he said Teresa would be staying. Upon information and belief, that apartment building was on 66'h Street and is where Epstein housed many of the models and other young women he was abusing.
113
+
114
+ 41. Once she arrived, Teresa received instructions by telephone to go to Ghislaine Maxwell's home the following day. Maxwell is a British socialite and was one of Epstein's primary "recruiters" of young women. Teresa did as she was told and went to Maxwell's home the next day. She was greeted by a and shown into a large sitting room. She noticed a framed photograph of Maxwell and a former high U.S. government official in the bathroom.
115
+
116
+ 42. When Teresa went back into the sitting room, Maxwell came in wearing only a bathrobe. She and Teresa spoke for about an hour. She had set up a massage table and Teresa proceeded to give Maxwell a massage as she had been trained to do.
117
+
118
+ 43. After the massage, Maxwell informed Teresa that she would be meeting Epstein for a massage and interview. Maxwell bragged about Epstein's mansion and called it the largest brownstone in Manhattan. She then paid Teresa \$100 for the massage and told her to give Epstein "whatever he wants" during his massage because Epstein "always gets what he wants."
119
+
120
+ 44. When Teresa returned to the 66'h Street apartment building, she received a call with instructions to go to Epstein's mansion. She walked to Epstein's mansion as instructed and was overwhelmed by its lavishness. She was told to wait in what appeared to be an office.
121
+
122
+ 45. Eventually, Epstein led Teresa upstairs and down a hallway to his personal office.
123
+
124
+ 46. Epstein asked Teresa to sit down and began asking her personal questions. He eventually asked her to give him a foot massage. She agreed and placed his foot in her lap so that she could begin the massage. As Teresa began massaging Epstein's foot, he started pressing his foot against intimate parts of Teresa's body. Teresa became uncomfortable, adjusted her position, and moved Epstein's foot up to keep it away from her body. But Epstein continued pushing his foot into her body.
125
+
126
+ 47. Teresa tried to remain calm and professional despite Epstein's nonconsensual touching. She asked Epstein to change his position so she could massage him at a different angle, but Epstein continued to push his foot into her intimate parts of Teresa's body.
127
+
128
+ 48. While still on the in Epstein's office, Epstein got close to Teresa, grabbed her chin with his hand, turned her face towards him, and said that he knew he could trust Teresa. Specifically, he said, "I know I can always trust a woman who shows her gums when she smiles." Epstein's actions terrified Teresa.
129
+
130
+ 49. Epstein then got up to walk Teresa out of the room. Teresa was walking in front of Epstein when he abruptly grabbed her and proceeded to sexually assault her against her will. Teresa stopped walking and Epstein then forcefully grabbed her and sexually assaulted her again. Teresa was frozen with shock and fear. Once Epstein released her she continued walking towards the front door of the mansion.
131
+
132
+ 50. Just before Teresa stepped out the front door, Epstein grabbed her buttocks and said, "Don't do anything I wouldn't do." Teresa proceeded to leave Epstein's mansion, and went back to the 66th Street apartment building.
133
+
134
+ 51. Teresa was devastated that the traveling masseuse position was not what she had anticipated. She was also scared because she recognized that Epstein was a very powerful person based on what told her and the photographs and other clear displays of wealth in his home.
135
+
136
+ 52. Epstein made very clear to Teresa that he was incredibly wealthy, powerful, and regularly in contact with world leaders. In fact, in his New York mansion he had photographs displayed of significant political figures to ensure that any young female entering the home would know that he had extensive government connections. Epstein was not to be disobeyed and he made clear by his words and actions that there would be consequences if Teresa did not comply with his demands.
137
+
138
+ 53. When Teresa got back to California, she received an e-mail from one of Epstein's co-conspirators thanking her for visiting New York and letting her know that Epstein and his co-conspirators would need to decide whether or not they wanted to hire her. She did not respond to the e-mail.
139
+
140
+ 54. Due to the distress caused by Epstein's assault, Teresa did not finish massage therapy school with the same certification that she initially set out to achieve. Teresa also ended up leaving California and moving back to Ohio a few short months after the assault.
141
+
142
+ 55. Teresa was deeply affected by the assault and she suffers severe emotional distress from an experience that has affected her for her entire life.
143
+
144
+ 56. Epstein's sexual assault and battery of Teresa continues to cause her significant distress and harm.
145
+
146
+ ### FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION
147
+
148
+ ### (Batten )
149
+
150
+ 57. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges the allegations stated above in paragraphs 1-56 as if fully set forth herein.
151
+
152
+ 58. Epstein intentionally committed battery by sexually assaulting Plaintiff when she was a young woman. As described above, Epstein intentionally touched intimate parts of Plaintiff's body in an offensive and sexual manner without her consent.
153
+
154
+ 59. A criminal action against Epstein with respect to the same sex trafficking enterprise from which Plaintiff's first cause of action arises was terminated on August 29, 2019, less than one year prior to the filing of this Complaint. See N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 215(8Xa).
155
+
156
+ 60. As a direct and proximate result of Epstein's conduct, Plaintiff has in the past and will in the future continue to suffer extreme emotional distress, humiliation, fear, psychological trauma, loss of dignity and self-esteem, and invasion of her privacy.
157
+
158
+ ### SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION
159
+
160
+ ### (Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress?
161
+
162
+ 61. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges the allegations stated above in paragraphs 1-56 as if fully set forth herein.
163
+
164
+ 62. As a direct result of these allegations as stated, Epstein committed intentional infliction of emotional distress against Plaintiff.
165
+
166
+ 63. Epstein's actions, described above, constitute extreme and outrageous conduct that shocks the conscience. Epstein's plan to recruit, entice, and assault Plaintiff goes beyond all possible bounds of decency and is intolerable in a civilized community.
167
+
168
+ 64. Epstein knew or disregarded the substantial likelihood that these actions would cause Plaintiff severe emotional distress.
169
+
170
+ 65. A criminal action against Epstein with respect to the same sex trafficking enterprise from which Plaintiff's second cause of action arises was terminated on August 29, 2019, less than one year prior to the filing of this Complaint. See N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 215(8Xa).
171
+
172
+ 66. As a direct and proximate result of Epstein's conduct, Plaintiff has in the past and will in the future continue to suffer extreme emotional distress, humiliation, fear, psychological trauma, loss of dignity and self-esteem, and invasion of her privacy.
173
+
174
+ ### PRAYER FOR RELIEF
175
+
176
+ WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests judgment against Defendants, awarding compensatory, consequential, exemplary, and punitive damages in an amount to be determined at trial; costs of suit; attorneys' fees; and such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper.
177
+
178
+ ### JURY DEMAND
179
+
180
+ Plaintiff hereby demands a trial by jury on all causes of action asserted within this pleading.
181
+
182
+ Dated: November 12, 2019.
183
+
184
+ /5/ Joshua 1. Schiller
185
+
186
+ David Boies Bows SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP 333 Main Street Armonk, NY 10504 (914) 749-8200
187
+
188
+ Joshua I. Schiller BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP 55 Hudson Yards New York, NY 10001 (212) 446-2300
189
+
190
+ Sigrid McCawley (Pro Hac Vice Pending) BOILS SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP 401 E. Las Olas Blvd., Suite 1200 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 (954) 356-0011
191
+
192
+ # EXHIBIT A
193
+
194
+ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
195
+
196
+ x UNITED. STATES OF AMERICA JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. x SEALED 19 Cr.
197
+
198
+ INDICTMENT 19 QUM 490
199
+
200
+ COUNT ONE (Sex Trafficking Conspiracy)
201
+
202
+ The Grand Jury charges:
203
+
204
+ ### OVERVIEW
205
+
206
+ 1. As set forth herein, over the course of many years, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, sexually exploited and abused dozens of minor girls at his homes in Manhattan, New York, and Palm Beach, Florida, among other locations.
207
+
208
+ 2. In particular, from at least in or about 2002, up to and including at least in or about 2005, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, enticed and recruited, and caused to be enticed and recruited, minor girls to visit his mansion in Manhattan, New York (the "New York Residence") and his estate in Palm Beach, Florida (the "Palm Beach Residence") to engage in sex acts with him, after which he would give the victims hundreds of dollars in cash. Moreover, and in order to maintain and increase his supply of victims, EPSTEIN also paid certain of his victims to recruit additional girls to be similarly abused by EPSTEIN. In
209
+
210
+ this way, EPSTEIN created a vast network of underage victims for him to sexually exploit in locations including New York and Palm Beach.
211
+
212
+ 3. The victims described herein were as young as 14 years old at the time they were abused by JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, and were, for various reasons, often particularly vulnerable to exploitation. EPSTEIN intentionally sought out minors and knew that many of his victims were in fact under the age of 18, including because, in some instances, minor victims expressly told him their age.
213
+
214
+ 4. In creating and maintaining this network of minor victims in multiple states to sexually abuse and exploit, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, worked and conspired with others, including employees and associates who facilitated his conduct by, among other things, contacting victims and scheduling their sexual encounters with EPSTEIN at the New York Residence and at the Palm Beach Residence.
215
+
216
+ ## FACTUAL BACKGROUND
217
+
218
+ 5. During all time periods charged in this Indictment, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, was a financier with multiple residences in the continental United States, including the New York Residence and the Palm Beach Residence.
219
+
220
+ 6. Beginning in at least 2002, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, enticed and recruited, and caused to be enticed and
221
+
222
+ recruited, dozens of minor girls to engage in sex acts with him, after which EPSTEIN paid the victims hundreds of dollars in cash, at the New York Residence and the Palm Beach Residence.
223
+
224
+ 7. In both New York and Florida, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, perpetuated this abuse in similar ways. Victims were initially recruited to provide "massages" to EPSTEIN, which would be performed nude or partially nude, would become increasingly sexual in nature, and would typically include one or more sex acts. EPSTEIN paid his victims hundreds of dollars in cash for each encounter. Moreover, EPSTEIN actively encouraged certain of his victims to recruit additional girls to be similarly sexually abused. EPSTEIN incentivized his victims to become recruiters by paying these victim-recruiters hundreds of dollars for each girl that they brought to EPSTEIN. In so doing, EPSTEIN maintained a steady supply of new victims to exploit.
225
+
226
+ ### The New York Residence
227
+
228
+ 8. At all times relevant to this Indictment, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, possessed and controlled amulti-story private residence on the Upper East Side of Manhattan, New York, i.e., the New York Residence. Between at least in or about <sup>2002</sup> and in or about 2005, EPSTEIN abused numerous minor victims at the New York Residence by causing these victims to be recruited to engage in paid sex acts with him.
229
+
230
+ 9. When a victim arrived at the New York Residence, she typically would be escorted to a room with a massage table, where she would perform a massage on JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant. The victims, who were as young as 14 years of age, were told by EPSTEIN or other individuals to partially or fully undress before beginning the "massage." During the encounter, EPSTEIN would escalate the nature and scope of physical contact with his victim to include, among other things, sex acts such as groping and direct and indirect contact with the victim's genitals. EPSTEIN typically would also masturbate during these sexualized encounters, ask victims to touch him while he masturbated, and touch victims' genitals with his hands or with sex toys.
231
+
232
+ 10. In connection with each sexual encounter, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, or one of his employees or associates, paid the victim in cash. Victims typically were paid hundreds of dollars in cash for each encounter.
233
+
234
+ 11. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, knew that many of his New York victims were underage, including because certain victims told him their age. Further, once these minor victims were recruited, many were abused by EPSTEIN on multiple subsequent occasions at the New York Residence. EPSTEIN sometimes personally contacted victims to schedule appointments at the New York Residence. In other instances, EPSTEIN directed
235
+
236
+ employees and associates, including aNew York-based employee ("Employee-1"), to communicate with victims via phone to arrange for these victims to return to the New York Residence for additional sexual encounters with EPSTEIN.
237
+
238
+ 12. Additionally, and to further facilitate his ability to abuse minor girls in New York, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, asked and enticed certain of his victims to recruit additional girls to perform "massages" and similarly engage in sex acts with EPSTEIN. When avictim would recruit another girl for EPSTEIN, he paid both the victim-recruiter and the new victim hundreds of dollars in cash. Through these victimrecruiters, EPSTEIN gained access to and was able to abuse dozens of additional minor girls.
239
+
240
+ 13. In particular, certain recruiters brought dozens of additional minor girls to the New York Residence to give massages to and engage in sex acts with JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant. EPSTEIN encouraged victims to recruit additional girls by offering to pay these victim-recruiters for every additional girl they brought to EPSTEIN. When avictimrecruiter accompanied anew minor victim to the New York Residence, both the victim-recruiter and the new minor victim were paid hundreds of dollars by EPSTEIN for each encounter. In addition, certain victim-recruiters routinely scheduled these
241
+
242
+ encounters through Employee-1, who sometimes asked the recruiters to bring a specific minor girl for EPSTEIN.
243
+
244
+ # The Palm Beach Residence
245
+
246
+ 14. In addition to recruiting and abusing minor girls in New York, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, created a similar network of minor girls to victimize in Palm Beach, Florida, where EPSTEIN owned, possessed and controlled another large residence, i.e., the Palm Beach Residence. EPSTEIN frequently traveled from New York to Palm Beach by private jet, before which an employee or associate would ensure that minor victims were available for encounters upon his arrival in Florida.
247
+
248
+ 15. At the Palm Beach Residence, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, engaged in a similar course of abusive conduct. When a victim initially arrived at the Palm Beach Residence, she would be escorted to a room, sometimes by an employee of EPSTEIN's, including, at times, two assistants ("Employee-2" and "Employee-3") who, as described herein, were also responsible for scheduling sexual encounters with minor victims. Once inside, the victim would provide a nude or semi-nude massage for EPSTEIN, who would himself typically be naked. During these encounters, EPSTEIN would escalate the nature and scope of the physical contact to include sex acts such as groping and direct and indirect contact with the victim's genitals. EPSTEIN would also typically masturbate during these encounters, ask victims
249
+
250
+ to touch him while he masturbated, and touch victims' genitals with his hands or with sex toys.
251
+
252
+ 16. In connection with each sexual encounter, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, or one of his employees or associates, • paid the victim in cash. Victims typically were paid hundreds of dollars for each encounter.
253
+
254
+ 17. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, knew that certain of his victims were underage, including because certain victims told him their age. In addition, as with New York-based victims, many Florida victims, once recruited, were abused by JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, on multiple additional occasions.
255
+
256
+ 18. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, who during the relevant time period was frequently in New York, would arrange for Employee-2 or other employees to contact victims by phone in advance of EPSTEIN's travel to Florida to ensure appointments were scheduled for when he arrived. In particular, in certain instances, Employee-2 placed phone calls to minor victims in Florida to schedule encounters at the Palm Beach Residence. At the time of certain of those phone calls, EPSTEIN and Employee-2 were in New York, New York. Additionally, certain of the individuals victimized at the Palm Beach Residence were contacted by phone by Employee-3 to schedule these encounters.
257
+
258
+ 19. Moreover, as in New York, to ensure a steady stream of minor victims, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, asked and enticed certain victims in Florida to recruit other girls to engage in sex acts. EPSTEIN paid hundreds of dollars to victimrecruiters for each additional girl they brought to the Palm Beach Residence.
259
+
260
+ ## STATUTORY ALLEGATIONS
261
+
262
+ 20. From at least in or about 2002, up to and including in or about 2005, in the Southern District of New York and elsewhere, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, and others known and unknown, willfully and knowingly did combine, conspire, confederate, and agree together and with each other to commit an offense against the United States, to wit, sex trafficking of minors, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1591(a) and (b).
263
+
264
+ 21. It was a part and object of the conspiracy that JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, and others known and unknown, would and did, in and affecting interstate and foreign commerce, recruit, entice, harbor, transport, provide, and obtain, by any means a person, and to benefit, financially and by receiving anything of value, from participation in a venture which has engaged in any such act, knowing that the person had not attained the age of 18 years and would be caused to engage in a
265
+
266
+ commercial sex act, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1591(a) and (b) (2).
267
+
268
+ ### Overt Acts
269
+
270
+ 22. In furtherance of the conspiracy and to effect the illegal object thereof, the following overt acts, among others, were committed in the Southern District of New York and elsewhere:
271
+
272
+ a. In or about 2004, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, enticed and recruited multiple minor victims, including minor victims identified herein as Minor Victim-1, Minor Victim-2, and Minor Victim-3, to engage in sex acts with EPSTEIN at his residences in Manhattan, New York, and Palm Beach, Florida, after which he provided them with hundreds of dollars in cash for each encounter.
273
+
274
+ b. In or about 2002, Minor Victim-1 was recruited to engage in sex acts with EPSTEIN and was repeatedly sexually abused by EPSTEIN at the New York Residence over <sup>a</sup> period of years and was paid hundreds of dollars for each encounter. EPSTEIN also encouraged and enticed Minor Victim-1 to recruit other girls to engage in paid sex acts, which she did. EPSTEIN asked Minor Victim-1 how old she was, and Minor Victim-1 answered truthfully.
275
+
276
+ c. In or about 2004, Employee-1, located in the Southern District of New York, and on behalf of EPSTEIN, placed
277
+
278
+ <sup>a</sup>telephone call to Minor Victim-1 in order to schedule an appointment for Minor Victim-1 to engage in paid sex acts with EPSTEIN.
279
+
280
+ d. In or about 2004, Minor Victim-2 was recruited to engage in sex acts with EPSTEIN and was repeatedly sexually abused by EPSTEIN at the Palm Beach Residence over <sup>a</sup> period of years and was paid hundreds of dollars after each encounter. EPSTEIN also encouraged and enticed Minor Victim-2 to recruit other girls to engage in paid sex acts, which she did.
281
+
282
+ e. In or about 2005, Employee-2, located in the Southern District of New York, and on behalf of EPSTEIN, placed <sup>a</sup>telephone call to Minor Victim-2 in order to schedule an appointment for Minor Victim-2 to engage in paid sex acts with EPSTEIN.
283
+
284
+ f. In or about 2005, Minor Victim-3 was recruited to engage in sex acts with EPSTEIN and was repeatedly sexually abused by EPSTEIN at the Palm Beach Residence over <sup>a</sup> period of years and was paid hundreds of dollars for each encounter. EPSTEIN also encouraged and enticed Minor Victim-3 to recruit other girls to engage in paid sex acts, which she did. EPSTEIN asked Minor Victim-3 how old she was, and Minor Victim-3 answered truthfully.
285
+
286
+ g. In or about 2005, Employee-2, located in the Southern District of New York, and on behalf of EPSTEIN, placed <sup>a</sup>telephone call to Minor Victim-3 in Florida in order to schedule an appointment for Minor Victim-3 to engage in paid sex acts with EPSTEIN.
287
+
288
+ h. In or about 2004, Employee-3 placed <sup>a</sup> telephone call to Minor Victim-3 in order to schedule an appointment for Minor Victim-3 to engage in paid sex acts with EPSTEIN.
289
+
290
+ (Title 18, United States Code, Section 371.)
291
+
292
+ ### COUNT TWO (Sex Trafficking)
293
+
294
+ The Grand Jury further charges:
295
+
296
+ 23. The allegations contained in paragraphs <sup>1</sup> through 19 and 22 of this Indictment are repeated and realleged as if fully set forth within.
297
+
298
+ 24. From at least in or about 2002, up to and including in or about 2005, in the Southern District of New York, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, willfully and knowingly, in and affecting interstate and foreign commerce, did recruit, entice, harbor, transport, provide, and obtain by any means <sup>a</sup> person, knowing that the person had not attained the age of <sup>18</sup> years and would be caused to engage in acommercial sex act, and did aid and abet the same, to wit, EPSTEIN recruited, enticed, harbored, transported, provided, and obtained numerous
299
+
300
+ individuals who were less than 18 years old, including but not limited to Minor Victim-1, as described above, and who were then caused to engage in at least one commercial sex act in Manhattan, New York.
301
+
302
+ > (Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1591(a), (b)(2), and 2.)
303
+
304
+ ### FORFEITURE ALLEGATIONS
305
+
306
+ 25. As a result of committing the offense alleged in Count Two of this Indictment, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, shall forfeit to the United States, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 1594(c)(1), any property, real and personal, that was used or intended to be used to commit or to facilitate the commission of the offense alleged in Count Two, and any property, real or personal, constituting or derived from any proceeds obtained, directly or indirectly, as a result of the offense alleged in Count Two, or any property traceable to such property, and the following specific property:
307
+
308
+ a. The lot or parcel of land, together with its buildings, appurtenances, improvements, fixtures, attachments and easements, located at 9 East 71st Street, New York, New York, with block number 1386 and lot number 10, owned by Maple, Inc.
309
+
310
+ ## Substitute Asset Provision
311
+
312
+ 26. If any of the above-described forfeitable property, as a result of any act or omission of the defendant:
313
+
314
+ - (a) cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence;
315
+ - (b) has been transferred or sold to, or deposited with, a third person;
316
+ - (c) has been placed beyond the jurisdiction of the Court; (d), has been substantially diminished in value; or
317
+ - (e) has been commingled with other property which cannot be subdivided without difficulty;
318
+
319
+ it is the intent of the United States, pursuant to 21 U.S.C.
320
+
321
+ § 853(p) and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c), to seek forfeiture of any other property of the defendant up to the value of the above forfeitable property.
322
+
323
+ (Title 18, United States Code, Section 1594; Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(p); and Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461.)
324
+
325
+ j4Itt iir 4 1 ( q) FOREPERSON GEOFFl Y . BERMAN United States Attorney Form No. USA-33s-274 (Ed. 9-25-58)
326
+
327
+ ### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
328
+
329
+ # UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
330
+
331
+ v.
332
+
333
+ JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
334
+
335
+ Defendant.
336
+
337
+ ### 'INDICTMENT
338
+
339
+ (18 U.S.C. §§ 371, 1591(a), (b) (2), and 2)
340
+
341
+ GEOFFREY S. BERMAN
342
+
343
+ United States Attorney
344
+
345
+ UW1CFCSOWLA
marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819086/EFTA02819086.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,1720 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819086.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 29,
15
+ "chars": 39429,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 3.42,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nFOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 165.24,
27
+ 98.82
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 446.5938415527344,
31
+ 98.82
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 446.5938415527344,
35
+ 127.863037109375
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 165.24,
39
+ 127.863037109375
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "COMPLAINT",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 266.21999999999997,
50
+ 387.98999999999995
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 346.5567321777344,
54
+ 387.98999999999995
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 346.5567321777344,
58
+ 403.863037109375
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 266.21999999999997,
62
+ 403.863037109375
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ },
66
+ {
67
+ "title": "NATURE OF THE ACTION",
68
+ "heading_level": null,
69
+ "page_id": 1,
70
+ "polygon": [
71
+ [
72
+ 228.276,
73
+ 182.25
74
+ ],
75
+ [
76
+ 383.56695556640625,
77
+ 182.25
78
+ ],
79
+ [
80
+ 383.56695556640625,
81
+ 196.4830322265625
82
+ ],
83
+ [
84
+ 228.276,
85
+ 196.4830322265625
86
+ ]
87
+ ]
88
+ },
89
+ {
90
+ "title": "PARTIES",
91
+ "heading_level": null,
92
+ "page_id": 4,
93
+ "polygon": [
94
+ [
95
+ 276.624,
96
+ 236.51999999999998
97
+ ],
98
+ [
99
+ 335.5362548828125,
100
+ 236.51999999999998
101
+ ],
102
+ [
103
+ 335.5362548828125,
104
+ 251.60302734375
105
+ ],
106
+ [
107
+ 276.624,
108
+ 251.60302734375
109
+ ]
110
+ ]
111
+ },
112
+ {
113
+ "title": "JURISDICTION AND VENUE",
114
+ "heading_level": null,
115
+ "page_id": 4,
116
+ "polygon": [
117
+ [
118
+ 221.54399999999998,
119
+ 401.76
120
+ ],
121
+ [
122
+ 389.5322570800781,
123
+ 401.76
124
+ ],
125
+ [
126
+ 389.5322570800781,
127
+ 417.363037109375
128
+ ],
129
+ [
130
+ 221.54399999999998,
131
+ 417.363037109375
132
+ ]
133
+ ]
134
+ },
135
+ {
136
+ "title": "FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS",
137
+ "heading_level": null,
138
+ "page_id": 5,
139
+ "polygon": [
140
+ [
141
+ 228.276,
142
+ 153.89999999999998
143
+ ],
144
+ [
145
+ 384.2815246582031,
146
+ 153.89999999999998
147
+ ],
148
+ [
149
+ 384.2815246582031,
150
+ 169.10302734375
151
+ ],
152
+ [
153
+ 228.276,
154
+ 169.10302734375
155
+ ]
156
+ ]
157
+ },
158
+ {
159
+ "title": "A. Epstein's Sex Trafficking Enterprise",
160
+ "heading_level": null,
161
+ "page_id": 5,
162
+ "polygon": [
163
+ [
164
+ 68.544,
165
+ 181.44
166
+ ],
167
+ [
168
+ 299.13690185546875,
169
+ 181.44
170
+ ],
171
+ [
172
+ 299.13690185546875,
173
+ 196.4830322265625
174
+ ],
175
+ [
176
+ 68.544,
177
+ 196.4830322265625
178
+ ]
179
+ ]
180
+ },
181
+ {
182
+ "title": "B. The Arrest. Prosecution, and Death of Epstein",
183
+ "heading_level": null,
184
+ "page_id": 6,
185
+ "polygon": [
186
+ [
187
+ 68.544,
188
+ 540.27
189
+ ],
190
+ [
191
+ 348.0184326171875,
192
+ 540.27
193
+ ],
194
+ [
195
+ 348.0184326171875,
196
+ 555.3630218505859
197
+ ],
198
+ [
199
+ 68.544,
200
+ 555.3630218505859
201
+ ]
202
+ ]
203
+ },
204
+ {
205
+ "title": "FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION",
206
+ "heading_level": null,
207
+ "page_id": 11,
208
+ "polygon": [
209
+ [
210
+ 228.276,
211
+ 595.3499999999999
212
+ ],
213
+ [
214
+ 384.3407897949219,
215
+ 595.3499999999999
216
+ ],
217
+ [
218
+ 384.3407897949219,
219
+ 610.1835174560547
220
+ ],
221
+ [
222
+ 228.276,
223
+ 610.1835174560547
224
+ ]
225
+ ]
226
+ },
227
+ {
228
+ "title": "(Batten )",
229
+ "heading_level": null,
230
+ "page_id": 11,
231
+ "polygon": [
232
+ [
233
+ 279.684,
234
+ 622.89
235
+ ],
236
+ [
237
+ 332.62725830078125,
238
+ 622.89
239
+ ],
240
+ [
241
+ 332.62725830078125,
242
+ 637.5635223388672
243
+ ],
244
+ [
245
+ 279.684,
246
+ 637.5635223388672
247
+ ]
248
+ ]
249
+ },
250
+ {
251
+ "title": "SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION",
252
+ "heading_level": null,
253
+ "page_id": 12,
254
+ "polygon": [
255
+ [
256
+ 220.93199999999996,
257
+ 319.95000000000005
258
+ ],
259
+ [
260
+ 390.6617126464844,
261
+ 319.95000000000005
262
+ ],
263
+ [
264
+ 390.6617126464844,
265
+ 334.4830322265625
266
+ ],
267
+ [
268
+ 220.93199999999996,
269
+ 334.4830322265625
270
+ ]
271
+ ]
272
+ },
273
+ {
274
+ "title": "(Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress?",
275
+ "heading_level": null,
276
+ "page_id": 12,
277
+ "polygon": [
278
+ [
279
+ 189.72,
280
+ 347.49
281
+ ],
282
+ [
283
+ 423.6756591796875,
284
+ 347.49
285
+ ],
286
+ [
287
+ 423.6756591796875,
288
+ 362.2330322265625
289
+ ],
290
+ [
291
+ 189.72,
292
+ 362.2330322265625
293
+ ]
294
+ ]
295
+ },
296
+ {
297
+ "title": "PRAYER FOR RELIEF",
298
+ "heading_level": null,
299
+ "page_id": 13,
300
+ "polygon": [
301
+ [
302
+ 240.516,
303
+ 154.71
304
+ ],
305
+ [
306
+ 372.47991943359375,
307
+ 154.71
308
+ ],
309
+ [
310
+ 372.47991943359375,
311
+ 169.10302734375
312
+ ],
313
+ [
314
+ 240.516,
315
+ 169.10302734375
316
+ ]
317
+ ]
318
+ },
319
+ {
320
+ "title": "JURY DEMAND",
321
+ "heading_level": null,
322
+ "page_id": 13,
323
+ "polygon": [
324
+ [
325
+ 258.264,
326
+ 292.40999999999997
327
+ ],
328
+ [
329
+ 353.7546081542969,
330
+ 292.40999999999997
331
+ ],
332
+ [
333
+ 353.7546081542969,
334
+ 306.7330627441406
335
+ ],
336
+ [
337
+ 258.264,
338
+ 306.7330627441406
339
+ ]
340
+ ]
341
+ },
342
+ {
343
+ "title": "EXHIBIT A",
344
+ "heading_level": null,
345
+ "page_id": 14,
346
+ "polygon": [
347
+ [
348
+ 206.856,
349
+ 364.5
350
+ ],
351
+ [
352
+ 409.27008056640625,
353
+ 364.5
354
+ ],
355
+ [
356
+ 409.27008056640625,
357
+ 403.29022216796875
358
+ ],
359
+ [
360
+ 206.856,
361
+ 403.29022216796875
362
+ ]
363
+ ]
364
+ },
365
+ {
366
+ "title": "OVERVIEW",
367
+ "heading_level": null,
368
+ "page_id": 15,
369
+ "polygon": [
370
+ [
371
+ 272.34000000000003,
372
+ 344.25
373
+ ],
374
+ [
375
+ 338.08984375,
376
+ 344.25
377
+ ],
378
+ [
379
+ 338.08984375,
380
+ 356.4
381
+ ],
382
+ [
383
+ 272.34000000000003,
384
+ 356.4
385
+ ]
386
+ ]
387
+ },
388
+ {
389
+ "title": "FACTUAL BACKGROUND",
390
+ "heading_level": null,
391
+ "page_id": 16,
392
+ "polygon": [
393
+ [
394
+ 235.00799999999998,
395
+ 548.3700000000001
396
+ ],
397
+ [
398
+ 373.19183349609375,
399
+ 548.3700000000001
400
+ ],
401
+ [
402
+ 373.19183349609375,
403
+ 563.3331146240234
404
+ ],
405
+ [
406
+ 235.00799999999998,
407
+ 563.3331146240234
408
+ ]
409
+ ]
410
+ },
411
+ {
412
+ "title": "The New York Residence",
413
+ "heading_level": null,
414
+ "page_id": 17,
415
+ "polygon": [
416
+ [
417
+ 220.32,
418
+ 520.83
419
+ ],
420
+ [
421
+ 387.067626953125,
422
+ 520.83
423
+ ],
424
+ [
425
+ 387.067626953125,
426
+ 533.79
427
+ ],
428
+ [
429
+ 220.32,
430
+ 533.79
431
+ ]
432
+ ]
433
+ },
434
+ {
435
+ "title": "The Palm Beach Residence",
436
+ "heading_level": null,
437
+ "page_id": 20,
438
+ "polygon": [
439
+ [
440
+ 217.26,
441
+ 140.13
442
+ ],
443
+ [
444
+ 401.2801818847656,
445
+ 140.13
446
+ ],
447
+ [
448
+ 401.2801818847656,
449
+ 155.703125
450
+ ],
451
+ [
452
+ 217.26,
453
+ 155.703125
454
+ ]
455
+ ]
456
+ },
457
+ {
458
+ "title": "STATUTORY ALLEGATIONS",
459
+ "heading_level": null,
460
+ "page_id": 22,
461
+ "polygon": [
462
+ [
463
+ 227.052,
464
+ 249.48
465
+ ],
466
+ [
467
+ 388.77886962890625,
468
+ 249.48
469
+ ],
470
+ [
471
+ 388.77886962890625,
472
+ 264.463134765625
473
+ ],
474
+ [
475
+ 227.052,
476
+ 264.463134765625
477
+ ]
478
+ ]
479
+ },
480
+ {
481
+ "title": "Overt Acts",
482
+ "heading_level": null,
483
+ "page_id": 23,
484
+ "polygon": [
485
+ [
486
+ 266.832,
487
+ 140.94
488
+ ],
489
+ [
490
+ 345.1272888183594,
491
+ 140.94
492
+ ],
493
+ [
494
+ 345.1272888183594,
495
+ 153.09
496
+ ],
497
+ [
498
+ 266.832,
499
+ 153.09
500
+ ]
501
+ ]
502
+ },
503
+ {
504
+ "title": "COUNT TWO \n(Sex Trafficking)",
505
+ "heading_level": null,
506
+ "page_id": 25,
507
+ "polygon": [
508
+ [
509
+ 241.74,
510
+ 355.59000000000003
511
+ ],
512
+ [
513
+ 369.4290466308594,
514
+ 355.59000000000003
515
+ ],
516
+ [
517
+ 369.4290466308594,
518
+ 381.58563232421875
519
+ ],
520
+ [
521
+ 241.74,
522
+ 381.58563232421875
523
+ ]
524
+ ]
525
+ },
526
+ {
527
+ "title": "FORFEITURE ALLEGATIONS",
528
+ "heading_level": null,
529
+ "page_id": 26,
530
+ "polygon": [
531
+ [
532
+ 223.99200000000002,
533
+ 235.70999999999998
534
+ ],
535
+ [
536
+ 392.928466796875,
537
+ 235.70999999999998
538
+ ],
539
+ [
540
+ 392.928466796875,
541
+ 250.5831298828125
542
+ ],
543
+ [
544
+ 223.99200000000002,
545
+ 250.5831298828125
546
+ ]
547
+ ]
548
+ },
549
+ {
550
+ "title": "Substitute Asset Provision",
551
+ "heading_level": null,
552
+ "page_id": 27,
553
+ "polygon": [
554
+ [
555
+ 210.52799999999996,
556
+ 87.48
557
+ ],
558
+ [
559
+ 408.4338684082031,
560
+ 87.48
561
+ ],
562
+ [
563
+ 408.4338684082031,
564
+ 102.463134765625
565
+ ],
566
+ [
567
+ 210.52799999999996,
568
+ 102.463134765625
569
+ ]
570
+ ]
571
+ },
572
+ {
573
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK",
574
+ "heading_level": null,
575
+ "page_id": 28,
576
+ "polygon": [
577
+ [
578
+ 198.288,
579
+ 223.56000000000003
580
+ ],
581
+ [
582
+ 417.1194152832031,
583
+ 223.56000000000003
584
+ ],
585
+ [
586
+ 417.1194152832031,
587
+ 252.5751953125
588
+ ],
589
+ [
590
+ 198.288,
591
+ 252.5751953125
592
+ ]
593
+ ]
594
+ },
595
+ {
596
+ "title": "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA",
597
+ "heading_level": null,
598
+ "page_id": 28,
599
+ "polygon": [
600
+ [
601
+ 215.42399999999998,
602
+ 281.07
603
+ ],
604
+ [
605
+ 398.9065856933594,
606
+ 281.07
607
+ ],
608
+ [
609
+ 398.9065856933594,
610
+ 296.4451599121094
611
+ ],
612
+ [
613
+ 215.42399999999998,
614
+ 296.4451599121094
615
+ ]
616
+ ]
617
+ },
618
+ {
619
+ "title": "'INDICTMENT",
620
+ "heading_level": null,
621
+ "page_id": 28,
622
+ "polygon": [
623
+ [
624
+ 264.384,
625
+ 406.62
626
+ ],
627
+ [
628
+ 347.3147888183594,
629
+ 406.62
630
+ ],
631
+ [
632
+ 347.3147888183594,
633
+ 421.3251953125
634
+ ],
635
+ [
636
+ 264.384,
637
+ 421.3251953125
638
+ ]
639
+ ]
640
+ }
641
+ ],
642
+ "page_stats": [
643
+ {
644
+ "page_id": 0,
645
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
646
+ "block_counts": [
647
+ [
648
+ "Span",
649
+ 23
650
+ ],
651
+ [
652
+ "Line",
653
+ 12
654
+ ],
655
+ [
656
+ "Text",
657
+ 8
658
+ ],
659
+ [
660
+ "SectionHeader",
661
+ 2
662
+ ],
663
+ [
664
+ "PageFooter",
665
+ 2
666
+ ],
667
+ [
668
+ "PageHeader",
669
+ 1
670
+ ]
671
+ ],
672
+ "block_metadata": {
673
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
674
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
675
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
676
+ "previous_text": "",
677
+ "previous_type": "",
678
+ "previous_order": 0
679
+ }
680
+ },
681
+ {
682
+ "page_id": 1,
683
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
684
+ "block_counts": [
685
+ [
686
+ "Span",
687
+ 47
688
+ ],
689
+ [
690
+ "Line",
691
+ 24
692
+ ],
693
+ [
694
+ "ListItem",
695
+ 4
696
+ ],
697
+ [
698
+ "PageFooter",
699
+ 2
700
+ ],
701
+ [
702
+ "PageHeader",
703
+ 1
704
+ ],
705
+ [
706
+ "Text",
707
+ 1
708
+ ],
709
+ [
710
+ "SectionHeader",
711
+ 1
712
+ ],
713
+ [
714
+ "ListGroup",
715
+ 1
716
+ ]
717
+ ],
718
+ "block_metadata": {
719
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
720
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
721
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
722
+ "previous_text": "",
723
+ "previous_type": "",
724
+ "previous_order": 0
725
+ }
726
+ },
727
+ {
728
+ "page_id": 2,
729
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
730
+ "block_counts": [
731
+ [
732
+ "Span",
733
+ 52
734
+ ],
735
+ [
736
+ "Line",
737
+ 26
738
+ ],
739
+ [
740
+ "Text",
741
+ 5
742
+ ],
743
+ [
744
+ "PageFooter",
745
+ 2
746
+ ],
747
+ [
748
+ "PageHeader",
749
+ 1
750
+ ]
751
+ ],
752
+ "block_metadata": {
753
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
754
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
755
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
756
+ "previous_text": "",
757
+ "previous_type": "",
758
+ "previous_order": 0
759
+ }
760
+ },
761
+ {
762
+ "page_id": 3,
763
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
764
+ "block_counts": [
765
+ [
766
+ "Span",
767
+ 56
768
+ ],
769
+ [
770
+ "Line",
771
+ 26
772
+ ],
773
+ [
774
+ "Text",
775
+ 7
776
+ ],
777
+ [
778
+ "PageFooter",
779
+ 2
780
+ ],
781
+ [
782
+ "PageHeader",
783
+ 1
784
+ ]
785
+ ],
786
+ "block_metadata": {
787
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
788
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
789
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
790
+ "previous_text": "",
791
+ "previous_type": "",
792
+ "previous_order": 0
793
+ }
794
+ },
795
+ {
796
+ "page_id": 4,
797
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
798
+ "block_counts": [
799
+ [
800
+ "Span",
801
+ 51
802
+ ],
803
+ [
804
+ "Line",
805
+ 26
806
+ ],
807
+ [
808
+ "Text",
809
+ 7
810
+ ],
811
+ [
812
+ "SectionHeader",
813
+ 2
814
+ ],
815
+ [
816
+ "PageFooter",
817
+ 2
818
+ ],
819
+ [
820
+ "PageHeader",
821
+ 1
822
+ ]
823
+ ],
824
+ "block_metadata": {
825
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
826
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
827
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
828
+ "previous_text": "",
829
+ "previous_type": "",
830
+ "previous_order": 0
831
+ }
832
+ },
833
+ {
834
+ "page_id": 5,
835
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
836
+ "block_counts": [
837
+ [
838
+ "Span",
839
+ 49
840
+ ],
841
+ [
842
+ "Line",
843
+ 25
844
+ ],
845
+ [
846
+ "Text",
847
+ 5
848
+ ],
849
+ [
850
+ "SectionHeader",
851
+ 2
852
+ ],
853
+ [
854
+ "PageFooter",
855
+ 2
856
+ ],
857
+ [
858
+ "PageHeader",
859
+ 1
860
+ ]
861
+ ],
862
+ "block_metadata": {
863
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
864
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
865
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
866
+ "previous_text": "",
867
+ "previous_type": "",
868
+ "previous_order": 0
869
+ }
870
+ },
871
+ {
872
+ "page_id": 6,
873
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
874
+ "block_counts": [
875
+ [
876
+ "Span",
877
+ 54
878
+ ],
879
+ [
880
+ "Line",
881
+ 26
882
+ ],
883
+ [
884
+ "Text",
885
+ 2
886
+ ],
887
+ [
888
+ "PageFooter",
889
+ 2
890
+ ],
891
+ [
892
+ "PageHeader",
893
+ 1
894
+ ],
895
+ [
896
+ "SectionHeader",
897
+ 1
898
+ ]
899
+ ],
900
+ "block_metadata": {
901
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
902
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
903
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
904
+ "previous_text": "",
905
+ "previous_type": "",
906
+ "previous_order": 0
907
+ }
908
+ },
909
+ {
910
+ "page_id": 7,
911
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
912
+ "block_counts": [
913
+ [
914
+ "Span",
915
+ 49
916
+ ],
917
+ [
918
+ "Line",
919
+ 25
920
+ ],
921
+ [
922
+ "Text",
923
+ 7
924
+ ],
925
+ [
926
+ "PageFooter",
927
+ 2
928
+ ],
929
+ [
930
+ "PageHeader",
931
+ 1
932
+ ]
933
+ ],
934
+ "block_metadata": {
935
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
936
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
937
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
938
+ "previous_text": "",
939
+ "previous_type": "",
940
+ "previous_order": 0
941
+ }
942
+ },
943
+ {
944
+ "page_id": 8,
945
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
946
+ "block_counts": [
947
+ [
948
+ "Span",
949
+ 49
950
+ ],
951
+ [
952
+ "Line",
953
+ 24
954
+ ],
955
+ [
956
+ "Text",
957
+ 6
958
+ ],
959
+ [
960
+ "PageFooter",
961
+ 2
962
+ ],
963
+ [
964
+ "PageHeader",
965
+ 1
966
+ ]
967
+ ],
968
+ "block_metadata": {
969
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
970
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
971
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
972
+ "previous_text": "",
973
+ "previous_type": "",
974
+ "previous_order": 0
975
+ }
976
+ },
977
+ {
978
+ "page_id": 9,
979
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
980
+ "block_counts": [
981
+ [
982
+ "Span",
983
+ 58
984
+ ],
985
+ [
986
+ "Line",
987
+ 26
988
+ ],
989
+ [
990
+ "Text",
991
+ 7
992
+ ],
993
+ [
994
+ "PageFooter",
995
+ 2
996
+ ],
997
+ [
998
+ "PageHeader",
999
+ 1
1000
+ ]
1001
+ ],
1002
+ "block_metadata": {
1003
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
1004
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
1005
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
1006
+ "previous_text": "",
1007
+ "previous_type": "",
1008
+ "previous_order": 0
1009
+ }
1010
+ },
1011
+ {
1012
+ "page_id": 10,
1013
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
1014
+ "block_counts": [
1015
+ [
1016
+ "Span",
1017
+ 53
1018
+ ],
1019
+ [
1020
+ "Line",
1021
+ 26
1022
+ ],
1023
+ [
1024
+ "Text",
1025
+ 6
1026
+ ],
1027
+ [
1028
+ "PageFooter",
1029
+ 2
1030
+ ],
1031
+ [
1032
+ "PageHeader",
1033
+ 1
1034
+ ]
1035
+ ],
1036
+ "block_metadata": {
1037
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
1038
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
1039
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
1040
+ "previous_text": "",
1041
+ "previous_type": "",
1042
+ "previous_order": 0
1043
+ }
1044
+ },
1045
+ {
1046
+ "page_id": 11,
1047
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
1048
+ "block_counts": [
1049
+ [
1050
+ "Span",
1051
+ 51
1052
+ ],
1053
+ [
1054
+ "Line",
1055
+ 26
1056
+ ],
1057
+ [
1058
+ "Text",
1059
+ 7
1060
+ ],
1061
+ [
1062
+ "SectionHeader",
1063
+ 2
1064
+ ],
1065
+ [
1066
+ "PageFooter",
1067
+ 2
1068
+ ],
1069
+ [
1070
+ "PageHeader",
1071
+ 1
1072
+ ]
1073
+ ],
1074
+ "block_metadata": {
1075
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
1076
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
1077
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
1078
+ "previous_text": "",
1079
+ "previous_type": "",
1080
+ "previous_order": 0
1081
+ }
1082
+ },
1083
+ {
1084
+ "page_id": 12,
1085
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
1086
+ "block_counts": [
1087
+ [
1088
+ "Span",
1089
+ 53
1090
+ ],
1091
+ [
1092
+ "Line",
1093
+ 26
1094
+ ],
1095
+ [
1096
+ "Text",
1097
+ 8
1098
+ ],
1099
+ [
1100
+ "SectionHeader",
1101
+ 2
1102
+ ],
1103
+ [
1104
+ "PageFooter",
1105
+ 2
1106
+ ],
1107
+ [
1108
+ "PageHeader",
1109
+ 1
1110
+ ]
1111
+ ],
1112
+ "block_metadata": {
1113
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
1114
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
1115
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
1116
+ "previous_text": "",
1117
+ "previous_type": "",
1118
+ "previous_order": 0
1119
+ }
1120
+ },
1121
+ {
1122
+ "page_id": 13,
1123
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
1124
+ "block_counts": [
1125
+ [
1126
+ "Span",
1127
+ 67
1128
+ ],
1129
+ [
1130
+ "Line",
1131
+ 32
1132
+ ],
1133
+ [
1134
+ "Text",
1135
+ 8
1136
+ ],
1137
+ [
1138
+ "SectionHeader",
1139
+ 2
1140
+ ],
1141
+ [
1142
+ "PageFooter",
1143
+ 2
1144
+ ],
1145
+ [
1146
+ "PageHeader",
1147
+ 1
1148
+ ]
1149
+ ],
1150
+ "block_metadata": {
1151
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
1152
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
1153
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
1154
+ "previous_text": "",
1155
+ "previous_type": "",
1156
+ "previous_order": 0
1157
+ }
1158
+ },
1159
+ {
1160
+ "page_id": 14,
1161
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
1162
+ "block_counts": [
1163
+ [
1164
+ "Span",
1165
+ 5
1166
+ ],
1167
+ [
1168
+ "Line",
1169
+ 3
1170
+ ],
1171
+ [
1172
+ "PageHeader",
1173
+ 1
1174
+ ],
1175
+ [
1176
+ "SectionHeader",
1177
+ 1
1178
+ ],
1179
+ [
1180
+ "PageFooter",
1181
+ 1
1182
+ ]
1183
+ ],
1184
+ "block_metadata": {
1185
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
1186
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
1187
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
1188
+ "previous_text": "",
1189
+ "previous_type": "",
1190
+ "previous_order": 0
1191
+ }
1192
+ },
1193
+ {
1194
+ "page_id": 15,
1195
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
1196
+ "block_counts": [
1197
+ [
1198
+ "Span",
1199
+ 64
1200
+ ],
1201
+ [
1202
+ "Line",
1203
+ 31
1204
+ ],
1205
+ [
1206
+ "Text",
1207
+ 7
1208
+ ],
1209
+ [
1210
+ "PageHeader",
1211
+ 1
1212
+ ],
1213
+ [
1214
+ "SectionHeader",
1215
+ 1
1216
+ ],
1217
+ [
1218
+ "PageFooter",
1219
+ 1
1220
+ ]
1221
+ ],
1222
+ "block_metadata": {
1223
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
1224
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
1225
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
1226
+ "previous_text": "",
1227
+ "previous_type": "",
1228
+ "previous_order": 0
1229
+ }
1230
+ },
1231
+ {
1232
+ "page_id": 16,
1233
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
1234
+ "block_counts": [
1235
+ [
1236
+ "Span",
1237
+ 51
1238
+ ],
1239
+ [
1240
+ "Line",
1241
+ 26
1242
+ ],
1243
+ [
1244
+ "Text",
1245
+ 5
1246
+ ],
1247
+ [
1248
+ "PageFooter",
1249
+ 2
1250
+ ],
1251
+ [
1252
+ "PageHeader",
1253
+ 1
1254
+ ],
1255
+ [
1256
+ "SectionHeader",
1257
+ 1
1258
+ ]
1259
+ ],
1260
+ "block_metadata": {
1261
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
1262
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
1263
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
1264
+ "previous_text": "",
1265
+ "previous_type": "",
1266
+ "previous_order": 0
1267
+ }
1268
+ },
1269
+ {
1270
+ "page_id": 17,
1271
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
1272
+ "block_counts": [
1273
+ [
1274
+ "Span",
1275
+ 259
1276
+ ],
1277
+ [
1278
+ "Line",
1279
+ 27
1280
+ ],
1281
+ [
1282
+ "Text",
1283
+ 3
1284
+ ],
1285
+ [
1286
+ "PageFooter",
1287
+ 2
1288
+ ],
1289
+ [
1290
+ "PageHeader",
1291
+ 1
1292
+ ],
1293
+ [
1294
+ "SectionHeader",
1295
+ 1
1296
+ ]
1297
+ ],
1298
+ "block_metadata": {
1299
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
1300
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
1301
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
1302
+ "previous_text": "",
1303
+ "previous_type": "",
1304
+ "previous_order": 0
1305
+ }
1306
+ },
1307
+ {
1308
+ "page_id": 18,
1309
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
1310
+ "block_counts": [
1311
+ [
1312
+ "Span",
1313
+ 53
1314
+ ],
1315
+ [
1316
+ "Line",
1317
+ 27
1318
+ ],
1319
+ [
1320
+ "Text",
1321
+ 3
1322
+ ],
1323
+ [
1324
+ "PageFooter",
1325
+ 2
1326
+ ],
1327
+ [
1328
+ "PageHeader",
1329
+ 1
1330
+ ]
1331
+ ],
1332
+ "block_metadata": {
1333
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
1334
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
1335
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
1336
+ "previous_text": "",
1337
+ "previous_type": "",
1338
+ "previous_order": 0
1339
+ }
1340
+ },
1341
+ {
1342
+ "page_id": 19,
1343
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
1344
+ "block_counts": [
1345
+ [
1346
+ "Span",
1347
+ 246
1348
+ ],
1349
+ [
1350
+ "Line",
1351
+ 25
1352
+ ],
1353
+ [
1354
+ "Text",
1355
+ 3
1356
+ ],
1357
+ [
1358
+ "PageFooter",
1359
+ 2
1360
+ ],
1361
+ [
1362
+ "PageHeader",
1363
+ 1
1364
+ ]
1365
+ ],
1366
+ "block_metadata": {
1367
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
1368
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
1369
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
1370
+ "previous_text": "",
1371
+ "previous_type": "",
1372
+ "previous_order": 0
1373
+ }
1374
+ },
1375
+ {
1376
+ "page_id": 20,
1377
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
1378
+ "block_counts": [
1379
+ [
1380
+ "Span",
1381
+ 53
1382
+ ],
1383
+ [
1384
+ "Line",
1385
+ 27
1386
+ ],
1387
+ [
1388
+ "Text",
1389
+ 3
1390
+ ],
1391
+ [
1392
+ "PageFooter",
1393
+ 2
1394
+ ],
1395
+ [
1396
+ "PageHeader",
1397
+ 1
1398
+ ],
1399
+ [
1400
+ "SectionHeader",
1401
+ 1
1402
+ ]
1403
+ ],
1404
+ "block_metadata": {
1405
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
1406
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
1407
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
1408
+ "previous_text": "",
1409
+ "previous_type": "",
1410
+ "previous_order": 0
1411
+ }
1412
+ },
1413
+ {
1414
+ "page_id": 21,
1415
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
1416
+ "block_counts": [
1417
+ [
1418
+ "Span",
1419
+ 53
1420
+ ],
1421
+ [
1422
+ "Line",
1423
+ 27
1424
+ ],
1425
+ [
1426
+ "Text",
1427
+ 4
1428
+ ],
1429
+ [
1430
+ "PageFooter",
1431
+ 2
1432
+ ],
1433
+ [
1434
+ "PageHeader",
1435
+ 1
1436
+ ]
1437
+ ],
1438
+ "block_metadata": {
1439
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
1440
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
1441
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
1442
+ "previous_text": "",
1443
+ "previous_type": "",
1444
+ "previous_order": 0
1445
+ }
1446
+ },
1447
+ {
1448
+ "page_id": 22,
1449
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
1450
+ "block_counts": [
1451
+ [
1452
+ "Span",
1453
+ 50
1454
+ ],
1455
+ [
1456
+ "Line",
1457
+ 26
1458
+ ],
1459
+ [
1460
+ "Text",
1461
+ 3
1462
+ ],
1463
+ [
1464
+ "PageFooter",
1465
+ 2
1466
+ ],
1467
+ [
1468
+ "PageHeader",
1469
+ 1
1470
+ ],
1471
+ [
1472
+ "SectionHeader",
1473
+ 1
1474
+ ]
1475
+ ],
1476
+ "block_metadata": {
1477
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
1478
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
1479
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
1480
+ "previous_text": "",
1481
+ "previous_type": "",
1482
+ "previous_order": 0
1483
+ }
1484
+ },
1485
+ {
1486
+ "page_id": 23,
1487
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
1488
+ "block_counts": [
1489
+ [
1490
+ "Span",
1491
+ 250
1492
+ ],
1493
+ [
1494
+ "Line",
1495
+ 27
1496
+ ],
1497
+ [
1498
+ "Text",
1499
+ 5
1500
+ ],
1501
+ [
1502
+ "PageFooter",
1503
+ 2
1504
+ ],
1505
+ [
1506
+ "PageHeader",
1507
+ 1
1508
+ ],
1509
+ [
1510
+ "SectionHeader",
1511
+ 1
1512
+ ]
1513
+ ],
1514
+ "block_metadata": {
1515
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
1516
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
1517
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
1518
+ "previous_text": "",
1519
+ "previous_type": "",
1520
+ "previous_order": 0
1521
+ }
1522
+ },
1523
+ {
1524
+ "page_id": 24,
1525
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
1526
+ "block_counts": [
1527
+ [
1528
+ "Span",
1529
+ 251
1530
+ ],
1531
+ [
1532
+ "Line",
1533
+ 26
1534
+ ],
1535
+ [
1536
+ "Text",
1537
+ 4
1538
+ ],
1539
+ [
1540
+ "PageFooter",
1541
+ 2
1542
+ ],
1543
+ [
1544
+ "PageHeader",
1545
+ 1
1546
+ ]
1547
+ ],
1548
+ "block_metadata": {
1549
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
1550
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
1551
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
1552
+ "previous_text": "",
1553
+ "previous_type": "",
1554
+ "previous_order": 0
1555
+ }
1556
+ },
1557
+ {
1558
+ "page_id": 25,
1559
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
1560
+ "block_counts": [
1561
+ [
1562
+ "Span",
1563
+ 251
1564
+ ],
1565
+ [
1566
+ "Line",
1567
+ 28
1568
+ ],
1569
+ [
1570
+ "Text",
1571
+ 6
1572
+ ],
1573
+ [
1574
+ "PageFooter",
1575
+ 2
1576
+ ],
1577
+ [
1578
+ "PageHeader",
1579
+ 1
1580
+ ],
1581
+ [
1582
+ "SectionHeader",
1583
+ 1
1584
+ ]
1585
+ ],
1586
+ "block_metadata": {
1587
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
1588
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
1589
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
1590
+ "previous_text": "",
1591
+ "previous_type": "",
1592
+ "previous_order": 0
1593
+ }
1594
+ },
1595
+ {
1596
+ "page_id": 26,
1597
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
1598
+ "block_counts": [
1599
+ [
1600
+ "Span",
1601
+ 49
1602
+ ],
1603
+ [
1604
+ "Line",
1605
+ 25
1606
+ ],
1607
+ [
1608
+ "Text",
1609
+ 4
1610
+ ],
1611
+ [
1612
+ "PageFooter",
1613
+ 2
1614
+ ],
1615
+ [
1616
+ "PageHeader",
1617
+ 1
1618
+ ],
1619
+ [
1620
+ "SectionHeader",
1621
+ 1
1622
+ ]
1623
+ ],
1624
+ "block_metadata": {
1625
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
1626
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
1627
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
1628
+ "previous_text": "",
1629
+ "previous_type": "",
1630
+ "previous_order": 0
1631
+ }
1632
+ },
1633
+ {
1634
+ "page_id": 27,
1635
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
1636
+ "block_counts": [
1637
+ [
1638
+ "Span",
1639
+ 53
1640
+ ],
1641
+ [
1642
+ "Line",
1643
+ 23
1644
+ ],
1645
+ [
1646
+ "Text",
1647
+ 6
1648
+ ],
1649
+ [
1650
+ "ListItem",
1651
+ 4
1652
+ ],
1653
+ [
1654
+ "PageFooter",
1655
+ 2
1656
+ ],
1657
+ [
1658
+ "PageHeader",
1659
+ 1
1660
+ ],
1661
+ [
1662
+ "SectionHeader",
1663
+ 1
1664
+ ],
1665
+ [
1666
+ "ListGroup",
1667
+ 1
1668
+ ]
1669
+ ],
1670
+ "block_metadata": {
1671
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
1672
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
1673
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
1674
+ "previous_text": "",
1675
+ "previous_type": "",
1676
+ "previous_order": 0
1677
+ }
1678
+ },
1679
+ {
1680
+ "page_id": 28,
1681
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
1682
+ "block_counts": [
1683
+ [
1684
+ "Span",
1685
+ 32
1686
+ ],
1687
+ [
1688
+ "Line",
1689
+ 16
1690
+ ],
1691
+ [
1692
+ "Text",
1693
+ 8
1694
+ ],
1695
+ [
1696
+ "SectionHeader",
1697
+ 3
1698
+ ],
1699
+ [
1700
+ "PageFooter",
1701
+ 2
1702
+ ],
1703
+ [
1704
+ "PageHeader",
1705
+ 1
1706
+ ]
1707
+ ],
1708
+ "block_metadata": {
1709
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
1710
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
1711
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
1712
+ "previous_text": "",
1713
+ "previous_type": "",
1714
+ "previous_order": 0
1715
+ }
1716
+ }
1717
+ ],
1718
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02819086"
1719
+ }
1720
+ }
marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819115/EFTA02819115.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,137 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ JS 4dC/SDNY REV 06/01117
2
+
3
+ PLAINTIFFS
4
+
5
+ The JS-44 civil cover sheet and the anfonnabon contained herein neither reptace nor supplement the filing and evince of pleadings or other papers as required by law. accept as prowled by local rules of cart. TN:storm. approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September 1974. is required for use of the Clerk of Court for the purpose of immune the ovl docket sheet.
6
+
7
+ ATTORNEYS (FIRM NAME. ADDRESS. AND TELEPHONE NUMBER Joshua I. Schiller Boles Schiller Flexner LLP 55 Hudson Yards. New York. NY 10001 (212) 446-2300
8
+
9
+ DEFENDANTS
10
+
11
+ DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, in their capacities as the
12
+
13
+ executors of the ESTATE OF JEFFREY EDWARD EPSTEIN
14
+
15
+ ATTORNEYS (IF KNOWN) Bennet J Moskowitz 875 Third Avenue New York, NY 1OO22
16
+
17
+ CAUSE OF ACTION (CITE THE V S CIVIL STATUTE UNDER NMICH YOU ME FILING AND V%RITE A BRIEF STATEMENT OF CAUSE) (00 NOT CITE JURISDICTIONAL STATUTES UNLESS DIVERSITY)
18
+
19
+ 28 U.S.C. § 1332: New York causes of action
20
+
21
+ Has this action, case. or proceeding, or one essentially the same been previously filed in SONY at any time? Not:Yes Judge Previously Assigned
22
+
23
+ If yes, was this case Vol. ❑ Invol. 9 Dismissed. No ❑ Yes ❑ If yes. give date & Case No.
24
+
25
+ Is THIS MI INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CASE? No El Yes ❑
26
+
27
+ (PLACE AN (xJ IN ONE SOX ONLY) NATURE OF SUIT
28
+
29
+ TORTS
30
+
31
+ | CONTRACT | PERSONAL INJURY | PERSONAL INJURY | FORFEITURE/PENALTY | BANKRUPTCY | OTHER STATUTES |
32
+ |----------|-----------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
33
+ | [ ] 110 | INSURANCE | [ ] 310 AIRPLANE | [ ] 365 HEALTHCARE/<br>PHARMACEUTICAL PERSONAL | [ ] 422 APPEAL | [ ] 375 FALSE CLAIMS |
34
+ | [ ] 120 | MARINE | [ ] 315 AIRPLANE PRODUCT | INJURY/PRODUCT LIABILITY | [ ] 422 APPEAL | [ ] 376 QUI TAM |
35
+ | [ ] 130 | [ ] ACT | LIABILITY | [ ] 365 PERSONAL INJURY | [ ] 423 WITHDRAWAL | [ ] 400 STATE |
36
+ | [ ] 140 | NEGOTIABLE<br>INSTRUMENT | [ ] 320 ASSAULT, LIBEL &<br>SLANDER | [ ] 690 OTHER | [ ] 263 WITHDRAWAL | REAPPORTIONMENT |
37
+ | [ ] 150 | RECOVERY OF<br>OVERPAYMENT &<br>ENFORCEMENT | [ ] 330 FEDERAL<br>EMPLOYERS'<br>LIABILITY | INJURY PRODUCT | | [ ] 410 ANTITRUST |
38
+ | [ ] 151 | OF JUDGMENT | [ ] 340 MARINE | PROPERTY RIGHTS | [ ] 430 BANKS & BANKING | [ ] 450 COMMERCE |
39
+ | [ ] 152 | MEDICARE ACT | [ ] 345 MARINE PRODUCT | [ ] 830 COPYRIGHTS | [ ] 450 COMMERCE | [ ] 460 DEPORTATION |
40
+ | | RECOVERY OF<br>DEFAULTED<br>STUDENT LOANS | [ ] LIABILITY | [ ] 830 PATENT | [ ] 470 RACKETEER INFLU-<br>ENCED & CORRUPT | [ ] 490 CABLE/SATELLITE TV |
41
+ | [ ] 153 | (EXCL VETERANS)<br>RECOVERY OF<br>OVERPAYMENT | [ ] 350 MOTOR VEHICLE | [ ] 835 PATENT-ABBREVIATED NEW DRUG APPLICATION | | [ ] 480 CONSUMER CREDIT |
42
+ | | [ ] 355 MOTOR VEHICLE<br>PRODUCT LIABILITY | [ ] 355 MOTOR VEHICLE | [ ] 840 TRADEMARK | | [ ] 490 CABLE/SATELLITE TV |
43
+ | [ ] 153 | [ ] 360 OTHER PERSONAL<br>INJURY | [ ] 360 OTHER PERSONAL<br>PROPERTY DAMAGE | LABOR | [ ] 861 HIA (1395ff) | [ ] 850 SECURITIES/<br>COMMODITIES/<br>EXCHANGE |
44
+ | [ ] 160 | BENEFITS<br>STOCKHOLDERS<br>SUITS | [ ] 365 PROPERTY DAMAGE<br>PRODUCT LIABILITY | [ ] 710 FAIR LABOR<br>STANDARDS ACT | [ ] 863 DIV/CDIWW (405(g)) | [ ] 890 OTHER STATUTORY<br>ACTIONS |
45
+ | [ ] 190 | OTHER<br>CONTRACT<br>PRODUCT<br>LIABILITY | [ ] 370 OTHER FRAUD | [ ] 720 LABOR/MGMT<br>RELATIONS | [ ] 865 RSI (405(g)) | [ ] 891 AGRICULTURAL ACTS |
46
+ | [ ] 195 | CONTRACT<br>PRODUCT<br>LIABILITY | [ ] 510 MOTIONS TO<br>VACATE SENTENCE<br>28 USC 2255 | [ ] 740 RAILWAY LABOR ACT | | [ ] 896 OTHER STATUTORY<br>ACTIONS |
47
+ | | <b>ACTIONS UNDER STATUTES</b> | [ ] 463 ALIEN DETAINEE | [ ] 751 FAMILY MEDICAL | | [ ] 893 ENVIRONMENTAL<br>MATTERS |
48
+ | [ ] 106 | FRANCHISE | [ ] 540 MANDAMUS & OTHER<br>(Non-Prisoner) | [ ] 750 OTHER LABOR<br>LITIGATION | [ ] 870 TAXES (U.S. Plaintiff or<br>Defendant) | [ ] 895 FREEDOM OF<br>INFORMATION ACT |
49
+ | | <b>CIVIL RIGHTS</b> | [ ] 535 DEATH PENALTY | [ ] 791 EMPL. RET INC<br>SECURITY ACT (ERISA) | | [ ] 896 ARBITRATION |
50
+ | | [ ] 440 OTHER CIVIL RIGHTS<br>(Non-Prisoner) | [ ] 540 MANDAMUS & OTHER | [ ] 791 EMPL. RET INC | | [ ] 899 ADMINISTRATIVE<br>PROCEDURE ACT/REVIEW OR<br>APPEAL OF AGENCY DECISION |
51
+ | | <b>REAL PROPERTY</b> | | <b>IMMIGRATION</b> | | |
52
+ | [ ] 210 | LAND<br>CONDEMNATION | [ ] 441 VOTING | [ ] 462 NATURALIZATION | | |
53
+ | [ ] 220 | FORECLOSURE | [ ] 442 EMPLOYMENT | APPLICATION | | |
54
+ | [ ] 230 | RENT LEASE &<br>EJECTMENT | [ ] 443 HOUSING/<br>ACCOMMODATIONS | [ ] 465 OTHER IMMIGRATION<br>ACTIONS | | [ ] 950 CONSTITUTIONALITY OF<br>STATE STATUTES |
55
+ | [ ] 240 | TORTS TO LAND | [ ] 445 AMERICANS WITH<br>DISABILITIES -<br>EMPLOYMENT | [ ] 560 CIVIL RIGHTS | | |
56
+ | [ ] 245 | TORT PRODUCT<br>LIABILITY | [ ] 446 AMERICANS WITH<br>DISABILITIES -OTHER | CONDITIONS OF CONFINEMENT | | |
57
+ | [ ] 290 | ALL OTHER<br>REAL PROPERTY | [ ] 448 EDUCATION | | | |
58
+
59
+ ACTIONS UNDER STATUTES
60
+
61
+ Check it demanded if, Complaint:
62
+
63
+ CHECK IF THIS IS ACLASS ACTION UNDER F.R.C.P. 23
64
+
65
+ DEMAND OTHER JUDGE DOCKET NUMBER
66
+
67
+ Check YES only if demanded in complaint JURY DEMAND: [DYES CNo
68
+
69
+ O
70
+
71
+ DO YOU CLAIM THIS CASE IS RELATED TO A CIVIL CASE NOW PENDING IN S.D.N.Y. AS DEFINED BY LOCAL RULE FOR DIVISION OF BUSINESS 13? IF SO, STATE.
72
+
73
+ NOTE' You must also submit at the Ume of filing the Statement of Relatedness form (Form IH-32).
74
+
75
+ 1 Original Proceeding      2 Removed from State Court      3 Remanded from Appellate Court      4 Reinstated or Reopened      5 Transferred from (Specify District)      6 Multidistrict Litigation (Transferred)      7 Appeal to District Judge from Magistrate Judge
76
+ a. all parties represented      8 Multidistrict Litigation (Direct File)
77
+ b. At least one party is pro se.
78
+
79
+
80
+ (PLACE AN x IN ONE BOX ONLY)
81
+
82
+ BASIS OF JURISDICTION
83
+
84
+ 1 U.S. PLAINTIFF      2 U.S. DEFENDANT      3 FEDERAL QUESTION      4 DIVERSITY
85
+ (U.S. NOT A PARTY)
86
+
87
+
88
+ IF DIVERSITY, INDICATE CITIZENSHIP BELOW.
89
+
90
+ CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES (FOR DIVERSITY CASES ONLY)
91
+
92
+ (Place an [X] in one box for Plaintiff and one box for Defendant)
93
+
94
+ | CITIZEN OF THIS STATE | PTF [ ] 1 | DEF [ ] 1 | CITIZEN OR SUBJECT OF A FOREIGN COUNTRY | PTF DEF [ ] 3 [ ] 3 | INCORPORATED and PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS IN ANOTHER STATE | PTF [ ] 5 | DEF [ ] 5 |
95
+ |--------------------------|-----------|-----------|-----------------------------------------------------------|---------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|-----------|-----------|
96
+ | CITIZEN OF ANOTHER STATE | [X] 2 | [X] 2 | INCORPORATED or PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS IN THIS STATE | [ ] 4 [ ] 4 | FOREIGN NATION | [ ] 6 | [ ] 6 |
97
+
98
+ PLAINTIFF(S) ADDRESS(ES) AND COUNTY(IES)
99
+
100
+ [REDACTED]
101
+ 244 Corona Avenue
102
+ Oakwood, [REDACTED] 45419
103
+
104
+ DEFENDANT(S) ADDRESS(ES) AND COUNTY(IES)
105
+
106
+ Darren K. Indyke
107
+ Richard D. Kahn
108
+ U.S. Virgin Islands
109
+
110
+ DEFENDANT(S) ADDRESS UNKNOWN
111
+
112
+ REPRESENTATION IS HEREBY MADE THAT, AT THIS TIME, I HAVE BEEN UNABLE, WITH REASONABLE DILIGENCE, TO ASCERTAIN THE RESIDENCE ADDRESSES OF THE FOLLOWING DEFENDANTS:
113
+
114
+ Defendants are sued as executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. Per 28 U.S.C. § 1332, Defendants are deemed citizens of the U.S. Virgin Islands (USVI), decedent Epstein's domicile. Defendants' residential addresses are unknown to Plaintiff. Defendants' counsel is listed above.
115
+
116
+ COURTHOUSE ASSIGNMENT
117
+
118
+ I hereby certify that this case should be assigned to the courthouse indicated below pursuant to Local Rule for Division of Business 18, 20 or 21.
119
+
120
+ Check one: THIS ACTION SHOULD BE ASSIGNED TO: [REDACTED] PLAINS MANHATTAN
121
+
122
+ DATE 11/12/2019 SIGNATURE OF ATTORNEY OF RECORD
123
+
124
+ RECEIPT #
125
+
126
+ *[Handwritten Signature]*
127
+
128
+ ADMITTED TO PRACTICE IN THIS DISTRICT
129
+ [ ] NO
130
+ [X] YES (DATE ADMITTED Mo. 08 Yr. 2009)
131
+ Attorney Bar Code # JS3315
132
+
133
+ Magistrate Judge is to be designated by the Clerk of the Court.
134
+
135
+ Magistrate Judge \_\_\_\_\_ is so Designated.
136
+
137
+ Ruby J. Krajick, Clerk of Court by \_\_\_\_\_ Deputy Clerk, DATED \_\_\_\_\_.
marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819115/EFTA02819115.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,220 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819115.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 2,
15
+ "chars": 12540,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 18.61,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "CIVIL COVER SHEET",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 267.44399999999996,
27
+ 31.589999999999996
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 367.67755126953125,
31
+ 31.589999999999996
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 367.67755126953125,
35
+ 44.24591064453125
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 267.44399999999996,
39
+ 44.24591064453125
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "ORIGIN",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 1,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 302.328,
50
+ 48.599999999999994
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 339.048,
54
+ 48.599999999999994
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 339.048,
58
+ 58.31999999999999
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 302.328,
62
+ 58.31999999999999
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ },
66
+ {
67
+ "title": "BASIS OF JURISDICTION",
68
+ "heading_level": null,
69
+ "page_id": 1,
70
+ "polygon": [
71
+ [
72
+ 263.772,
73
+ 121.5
74
+ ],
75
+ [
76
+ 380.052,
77
+ 121.5
78
+ ],
79
+ [
80
+ 380.052,
81
+ 132.03000000000003
82
+ ],
83
+ [
84
+ 263.772,
85
+ 132.03000000000003
86
+ ]
87
+ ]
88
+ },
89
+ {
90
+ "title": "CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES (FOR DIVERSITY CASES ONLY)",
91
+ "heading_level": null,
92
+ "page_id": 1,
93
+ "polygon": [
94
+ [
95
+ 157.89600000000002,
96
+ 163.62
97
+ ],
98
+ [
99
+ 476.1360000000001,
100
+ 163.62
101
+ ],
102
+ [
103
+ 476.1360000000001,
104
+ 175.76999999999998
105
+ ],
106
+ [
107
+ 157.89600000000002,
108
+ 175.76999999999998
109
+ ]
110
+ ]
111
+ },
112
+ {
113
+ "title": "COURTHOUSE ASSIGNMENT",
114
+ "heading_level": null,
115
+ "page_id": 1,
116
+ "polygon": [
117
+ [
118
+ 258.876,
119
+ 531.36
120
+ ],
121
+ [
122
+ 380.052,
123
+ 531.36
124
+ ],
125
+ [
126
+ 380.052,
127
+ 541.8900000000001
128
+ ],
129
+ [
130
+ 258.876,
131
+ 541.8900000000001
132
+ ]
133
+ ]
134
+ }
135
+ ],
136
+ "page_stats": [
137
+ {
138
+ "page_id": 0,
139
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
140
+ "block_counts": [
141
+ [
142
+ "Span",
143
+ 488
144
+ ],
145
+ [
146
+ "Line",
147
+ 220
148
+ ],
149
+ [
150
+ "Text",
151
+ 24
152
+ ],
153
+ [
154
+ "PageHeader",
155
+ 1
156
+ ],
157
+ [
158
+ "SectionHeader",
159
+ 1
160
+ ],
161
+ [
162
+ "Table",
163
+ 1
164
+ ],
165
+ [
166
+ "PageFooter",
167
+ 1
168
+ ]
169
+ ],
170
+ "block_metadata": {
171
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
172
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
173
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
174
+ "previous_text": "",
175
+ "previous_type": "",
176
+ "previous_order": 0
177
+ }
178
+ },
179
+ {
180
+ "page_id": 1,
181
+ "text_extraction_method": "surya",
182
+ "block_counts": [
183
+ [
184
+ "Text",
185
+ 40
186
+ ],
187
+ [
188
+ "SectionHeader",
189
+ 6
190
+ ],
191
+ [
192
+ "PageHeader",
193
+ 2
194
+ ],
195
+ [
196
+ "Table",
197
+ 2
198
+ ],
199
+ [
200
+ "PageFooter",
201
+ 2
202
+ ],
203
+ [
204
+ "Form",
205
+ 2
206
+ ]
207
+ ],
208
+ "block_metadata": {
209
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
210
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
211
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
212
+ "previous_text": "",
213
+ "previous_type": "",
214
+ "previous_order": 0
215
+ }
216
+ }
217
+ ],
218
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02819115"
219
+ }
220
+ }
marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819117/EFTA02819117.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
+
3
+ for the
4
+
5
+ Southern District of New York
6
+
7
+ Plaintiffis)
8
+
9
+ v.
10
+
11
+ DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, in their capacities as the executors of the ESTATE OF JEFFREY EDWARD EPSTEIN
12
+
13
+ Defendant(s)
14
+
15
+ Civil Action No.
16
+
17
+ ## SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION
18
+
19
+ To: (Defendant's name and address) Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn do Bennet J. Moskowitz, attorney 875 Third Avenue New York, NY 10022
20
+
21
+ A lawsuit has been filed against you.
22
+
23
+ Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 (aX2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff's attorney, whose name and address are: Joshua Schiller
24
+
25
+ Boies Schiller Flexner LLP 55 Hudson Yards New York, NY 10001 (212)446-2300 jischiller@bsfllp.com
26
+
27
+ If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. You also must file your answer or motion with the court.
28
+
29
+ Date:
30
+
31
+ CLERK OF COURT
32
+
33
+ Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk
34
+
35
+ Civil Action No.
36
+
37
+ ## PROOF OF SERVICE
38
+
39
+ (This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed R. Civ. P. 4 (1))
40
+
41
+ This summons for (name of-individual and title. ijany) was received by me on (date)
42
+
43
+ O I personally served the summons on the individual at (mace/ on (date) ; or
44
+
45
+ O I left the summons at the individual's residence or usual place of abode with (name) , a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there, on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual's last known address; or
46
+
47
+ O I served the summons on (name of individual) designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization) on (date) ; or , who is
48
+
49
+ O I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or
50
+
51
+ O Other (speciM:
52
+
53
+ My fees are \$ for travel and \$ for services, for a total of \$ 0.00
54
+
55
+ I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.
56
+
57
+ Date: Server's signature
58
+
59
+ Printed name and title
60
+
61
+ Server's address
62
+
63
+ Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:
marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819117/EFTA02819117.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,170 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819117.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 2,
15
+ "chars": 2292,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 1.07,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 169.524,
27
+ 61.00433349609375
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 443.9737854003906,
31
+ 61.00433349609375
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 443.9737854003906,
35
+ 83.67779541015625
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 169.524,
39
+ 83.67779541015625
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 220.32,
50
+ 295.65
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 390.41302490234375,
54
+ 295.65
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 390.41302490234375,
58
+ 309.10406494140625
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 220.32,
62
+ 309.10406494140625
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ },
66
+ {
67
+ "title": "PROOF OF SERVICE",
68
+ "heading_level": null,
69
+ "page_id": 1,
70
+ "polygon": [
71
+ [
72
+ 249.696,
73
+ 88.28999999999999
74
+ ],
75
+ [
76
+ 362.36480712890625,
77
+ 88.28999999999999
78
+ ],
79
+ [
80
+ 362.36480712890625,
81
+ 101.34405517578125
82
+ ],
83
+ [
84
+ 249.696,
85
+ 101.34405517578125
86
+ ]
87
+ ]
88
+ }
89
+ ],
90
+ "page_stats": [
91
+ {
92
+ "page_id": 0,
93
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
94
+ "block_counts": [
95
+ [
96
+ "Span",
97
+ 71
98
+ ],
99
+ [
100
+ "Line",
101
+ 34
102
+ ],
103
+ [
104
+ "Text",
105
+ 17
106
+ ],
107
+ [
108
+ "PageHeader",
109
+ 2
110
+ ],
111
+ [
112
+ "SectionHeader",
113
+ 2
114
+ ],
115
+ [
116
+ "PageFooter",
117
+ 1
118
+ ]
119
+ ],
120
+ "block_metadata": {
121
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
122
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
123
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
124
+ "previous_text": "",
125
+ "previous_type": "",
126
+ "previous_order": 0
127
+ }
128
+ },
129
+ {
130
+ "page_id": 1,
131
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
132
+ "block_counts": [
133
+ [
134
+ "Span",
135
+ 57
136
+ ],
137
+ [
138
+ "Line",
139
+ 29
140
+ ],
141
+ [
142
+ "Text",
143
+ 14
144
+ ],
145
+ [
146
+ "PageHeader",
147
+ 2
148
+ ],
149
+ [
150
+ "SectionHeader",
151
+ 1
152
+ ],
153
+ [
154
+ "PageFooter",
155
+ 1
156
+ ]
157
+ ],
158
+ "block_metadata": {
159
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
160
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
161
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
162
+ "previous_text": "",
163
+ "previous_type": "",
164
+ "previous_order": 0
165
+ }
166
+ }
167
+ ],
168
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02819117"
169
+ }
170
+ }
marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819119/EFTA02819119.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ # UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
+
3
+ for the
4
+
5
+ Southern District of New York
6
+
7
+ ![](_page_0_Picture_136.jpeg)
8
+
9
+ *Plaintiff(s)*
10
+
11
+ v.
12
+
13
+ DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN,
14
+ in their capacities as the executors of the
15
+ ESTATE OF JEFFREY EDWARD EPSTEIN
16
+
17
+ *Defendant(s)*
18
+
19
+ )
20
+ )
21
+ )
22
+ )
23
+ )
24
+ )
25
+ )
26
+ )
27
+ )
28
+ )
29
+ )
30
+ )
31
+ )
32
+ )
33
+ )
34
+ )
35
+
36
+ Civil Action No.
37
+
38
+ ## SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION
39
+
40
+ To: *(Defendant's name and address)* Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn
41
+ c/o Bennet J. Moskowitz, attorney
42
+ 875 Third Avenue
43
+ New York, NY 10022
44
+
45
+ A lawsuit has been filed against you.
46
+
47
+ Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff's attorney, whose name and address are:
48
+
49
+ Joshua Schiller
50
+ Boies Schiller Flexner LLP
51
+ 55 Hudson Yards
52
+ New York, NY 10001
53
+ (212) 446-2300
54
+ jischiller@bsfllp.com
55
+
56
+ If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. You also must file your answer or motion with the court.
57
+
58
+ CLERK OF COURT
59
+
60
+ Date: 11/13/2019
61
+
62
+ /s/ P. Canales
63
+
64
+ *Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk*
65
+
66
+ ![]()Civil Action No.
67
+
68
+ ## PROOF OF SERVICE
69
+
70
+ (This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Pet R. Civ. P. 4 (1))
71
+
72
+ This summons for (name of individual and title. ij any) was received by me on (date)
73
+
74
+ O I personally served the summons on the individual at (place) on (date) ; or
75
+
76
+ O I left the summons at the individual's residence or usual place of abode with (name) , a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there, on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual's last known address; or
77
+
78
+ O I served the summons on (name of individual) designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization) on (date) ; or , who is
79
+
80
+ O I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or
81
+
82
+ O Other (specify):
83
+
84
+ My fees are \$ for travel and \$ for services, for a total of \$ 0.00
85
+
86
+ I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.
87
+
88
+ Date: Server's ,signature
89
+
90
+ Printed name and title
91
+
92
+ Server's address
93
+
94
+ Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:
marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819119/EFTA02819119.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,176 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819119.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 2,
15
+ "chars": 2453,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 6.47,
17
+ "image_assets": [
18
+ "_page_0_Picture_136.jpeg"
19
+ ],
20
+ "marker_metadata": {
21
+ "table_of_contents": [
22
+ {
23
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT",
24
+ "heading_level": null,
25
+ "page_id": 0,
26
+ "polygon": [
27
+ [
28
+ 169.524,
29
+ 62.37
30
+ ],
31
+ [
32
+ 440.02799999999996,
33
+ 62.37
34
+ ],
35
+ [
36
+ 440.02799999999996,
37
+ 81.0
38
+ ],
39
+ [
40
+ 169.524,
41
+ 81.0
42
+ ]
43
+ ]
44
+ },
45
+ {
46
+ "title": "SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION",
47
+ "heading_level": null,
48
+ "page_id": 0,
49
+ "polygon": [
50
+ [
51
+ 220.32,
52
+ 295.65
53
+ ],
54
+ [
55
+ 388.00800000000004,
56
+ 295.65
57
+ ],
58
+ [
59
+ 388.00800000000004,
60
+ 308.61
61
+ ],
62
+ [
63
+ 220.32,
64
+ 308.61
65
+ ]
66
+ ]
67
+ },
68
+ {
69
+ "title": "PROOF OF SERVICE",
70
+ "heading_level": null,
71
+ "page_id": 1,
72
+ "polygon": [
73
+ [
74
+ 249.08399999999997,
75
+ 88.28999999999999
76
+ ],
77
+ [
78
+ 362.3437194824219,
79
+ 88.28999999999999
80
+ ],
81
+ [
82
+ 362.3437194824219,
83
+ 101.34405517578125
84
+ ],
85
+ [
86
+ 249.08399999999997,
87
+ 101.34405517578125
88
+ ]
89
+ ]
90
+ }
91
+ ],
92
+ "page_stats": [
93
+ {
94
+ "page_id": 0,
95
+ "text_extraction_method": "surya",
96
+ "block_counts": [
97
+ [
98
+ "Span",
99
+ 73
100
+ ],
101
+ [
102
+ "Text",
103
+ 35
104
+ ],
105
+ [
106
+ "Line",
107
+ 35
108
+ ],
109
+ [
110
+ "PageHeader",
111
+ 4
112
+ ],
113
+ [
114
+ "SectionHeader",
115
+ 4
116
+ ],
117
+ [
118
+ "Picture",
119
+ 2
120
+ ],
121
+ [
122
+ "PageFooter",
123
+ 2
124
+ ]
125
+ ],
126
+ "block_metadata": {
127
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
128
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
129
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
130
+ "previous_text": "",
131
+ "previous_type": "",
132
+ "previous_order": 0
133
+ }
134
+ },
135
+ {
136
+ "page_id": 1,
137
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
138
+ "block_counts": [
139
+ [
140
+ "Span",
141
+ 62
142
+ ],
143
+ [
144
+ "Line",
145
+ 29
146
+ ],
147
+ [
148
+ "Text",
149
+ 14
150
+ ],
151
+ [
152
+ "PageHeader",
153
+ 2
154
+ ],
155
+ [
156
+ "SectionHeader",
157
+ 1
158
+ ],
159
+ [
160
+ "PageFooter",
161
+ 1
162
+ ]
163
+ ],
164
+ "block_metadata": {
165
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
166
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
167
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
168
+ "previous_text": "",
169
+ "previous_type": "",
170
+ "previous_order": 0
171
+ }
172
+ }
173
+ ],
174
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02819119"
175
+ }
176
+ }
marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819119/_page_0_Picture_136.jpeg ADDED

Git LFS Details

  • SHA256: 8b25076611e2ac674e73d50e43306a6813504631c38b65a260999b44deff551e
  • Pointer size: 129 Bytes
  • Size of remote file: 1.63 kB
marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819121/EFTA02819121.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
2
+
3
+ vs.
4
+
5
+ Plaintiff,
6
+
7
+ DARREN I. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, in their capacities as the executors of the ESTATE OF JEFFREY EDWARD EPSTEIN,
8
+
9
+ Defendants.
10
+
11
+ Case No. 1:19-cv- 10476 (PGG)
12
+
13
+ ## NOTICE OF APPEARANCE
14
+
15
+ PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned attorney, David Boies, who is a member in good standing of the bar of this Court, hereby appears as counsel for Plaintiff in the above-captioned proceeding.
16
+
17
+ Dated: New York, New York November 20, 2019
18
+
19
+ BOLES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP
20
+
21
+ By: /s/ David Boies David Boies 333 Main Street Armonk, NY 10504 Telephone: (914) 749-8200 Fax: (914) 749-8300 dboies@bsflIp.com
22
+
23
+ Attorney for Plaintiff
marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819121/EFTA02819121.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819121.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 1,
15
+ "chars": 689,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 0.68,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 192.78000000000003,
27
+ 71.28
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 418.4738464355469,
31
+ 71.28
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 418.4738464355469,
35
+ 100.10302734375
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 192.78000000000003,
39
+ 100.10302734375
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "NOTICE OF APPEARANCE",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 359.856,
50
+ 217.07999999999998
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 519.3272094726562,
54
+ 217.07999999999998
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 519.3272094726562,
58
+ 231.7330322265625
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 359.856,
62
+ 231.7330322265625
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ }
66
+ ],
67
+ "page_stats": [
68
+ {
69
+ "page_id": 0,
70
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
71
+ "block_counts": [
72
+ [
73
+ "Span",
74
+ 51
75
+ ],
76
+ [
77
+ "Line",
78
+ 26
79
+ ],
80
+ [
81
+ "Text",
82
+ 11
83
+ ],
84
+ [
85
+ "SectionHeader",
86
+ 2
87
+ ],
88
+ [
89
+ "PageHeader",
90
+ 1
91
+ ],
92
+ [
93
+ "PageFooter",
94
+ 1
95
+ ]
96
+ ],
97
+ "block_metadata": {
98
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
99
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
100
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
101
+ "previous_text": "",
102
+ "previous_type": "",
103
+ "previous_order": 0
104
+ }
105
+ }
106
+ ],
107
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02819121"
108
+ }
109
+ }
marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819122/EFTA02819122.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
2
+
3
+ Plaintiff,
4
+
5
+ - against -
6
+
7
+ DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, in their capacities as the executors of the ESTATE OF JEFFREY EDWARD EPSTEIN,
8
+
9
+ Defendants.
10
+
11
+ PAUL G. GARDEPHE, U.S.D.J.:
12
+
13
+ ## ORDER OF REFERENCE TO A MAGISTRATE JUDGE
14
+
15
+ 19 Civ. 10476 (PGG) (DCF)
16
+
17
+ The above entitled action is referred to the designated Magistrate Judge for the following purpose(s):
18
+
19
+ General Pretrial (includes scheduling, discovery, non-dispositive pretrial motions, and settlement)
20
+
21
+ > Specific Non-Dispositive Motion/Dispute:'
22
+
23
+ If referral is for discovery disputes when the District Judge is unavailable, the time period of the referral:
24
+
25
+ Settlement'
26
+
27
+ Inquest After Default/ Damages Hearing
28
+
29
+ Consent under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) for all purposes (including trial)
30
+
31
+ Consent under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) for limited purpose (e.g., dispositive motion, preliminary injunction)
32
+
33
+ Purpose:
34
+
35
+ Habeas Corpus
36
+
37
+ Social Security
38
+
39
+ Dispositive Motion (i.e., motion requiring a Report and Recommendation)
40
+
41
+ Particular Motion:
42
+
43
+ All such motions:
44
+
45
+ <sup>&#</sup>x27;Do not check if already referred for general pretrial. Dated: New York, New York
46
+
47
+ November)) , 2019 SO ORDERED.
48
+
49
+ Paul G. Gardephe United States District Judge
marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819122/EFTA02819122.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,151 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819122.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 2,
15
+ "chars": 1237,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 1.16,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 88.74,
27
+ 73.0250244140625
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 299.5245361328125,
31
+ 73.0250244140625
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 299.5245361328125,
35
+ 101.36248779296875
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 88.74,
39
+ 101.36248779296875
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "ORDER OF REFERENCE TO A \nMAGISTRATE JUDGE",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 340.884,
50
+ 141.64501953125
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 517.8264770507812,
54
+ 141.64501953125
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 517.8264770507812,
58
+ 170.36248779296875
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 340.884,
62
+ 170.36248779296875
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ }
66
+ ],
67
+ "page_stats": [
68
+ {
69
+ "page_id": 0,
70
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
71
+ "block_counts": [
72
+ [
73
+ "Span",
74
+ 89
75
+ ],
76
+ [
77
+ "Line",
78
+ 43
79
+ ],
80
+ [
81
+ "Text",
82
+ 21
83
+ ],
84
+ [
85
+ "SectionHeader",
86
+ 2
87
+ ],
88
+ [
89
+ "PageHeader",
90
+ 1
91
+ ],
92
+ [
93
+ "Footnote",
94
+ 1
95
+ ],
96
+ [
97
+ "PageFooter",
98
+ 1
99
+ ]
100
+ ],
101
+ "block_metadata": {
102
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
103
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
104
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
105
+ "previous_text": "",
106
+ "previous_type": "",
107
+ "previous_order": 0
108
+ }
109
+ },
110
+ {
111
+ "page_id": 1,
112
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
113
+ "block_counts": [
114
+ [
115
+ "Span",
116
+ 11
117
+ ],
118
+ [
119
+ "Line",
120
+ 5
121
+ ],
122
+ [
123
+ "Text",
124
+ 3
125
+ ],
126
+ [
127
+ "PageHeader",
128
+ 1
129
+ ],
130
+ [
131
+ "Caption",
132
+ 1
133
+ ],
134
+ [
135
+ "PageFooter",
136
+ 1
137
+ ]
138
+ ],
139
+ "block_metadata": {
140
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
141
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
142
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
143
+ "previous_text": "",
144
+ "previous_type": "",
145
+ "previous_order": 0
146
+ }
147
+ }
148
+ ],
149
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02819122"
150
+ }
151
+ }
marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819124/EFTA02819124.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
2
+
3
+ VS.
4
+
5
+ Plaintiff,
6
+
7
+ DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, in their capacities as the executors of the ESTATE OF JEFFREY EDWARD EPSTEIN,
8
+
9
+ Defendants.
10
+
11
+ Case No. 1:19-cv- 10476 (PGG)
12
+
13
+ #### MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE
14
+
15
+ Pursuant to Rule 1.3 of the Local Rules of the United States Courts for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York, I, Sigrid S. McCawley, hereby move this Court for an Order for Admission to practice Pro Hac Vice to appear as counsel for Plaintiff, in the abovecaptioned action.
16
+
17
+ I am in good standing in the bar of the State of Florida and there are no pending disciplinary proceedings against me in any state or federal court. I have never been convicted of a felony. I have never been censured, suspended, disbarred or denied admission or readmission by any court. I have attached the affidavit pursuant to Local Rule 1.3.
18
+
19
+ Dated: November 21, 2019 Respectfully Submitted,
20
+
21
+ /s/Sierid S. McCawlev
22
+
23
+ Sigrid S. McCawley Boies Schiller Flexner LLP 401 E. Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 1200 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Tel: (954) 356-0011 Fax: (954) 356 0022 Email: smccawley@bsfllp.com
24
+
25
+ Counsel for Plaintiff
26
+
27
+ # UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
28
+
29
+ VS.
30
+
31
+ Plaintiff,
32
+
33
+ DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, in their capacities as the executors of the ESTATE OF JEFFREY EDWARD EPSTEIN,
34
+
35
+ Defendants.
36
+
37
+ I, Sigrid S. McCawley, hereby declare as follows:
38
+
39
+ - I. I have never been convicted of a felony.
40
+ - 2. I have never been censured, suspended, disbarred or denied admission or readmission by any court.
41
+ - 3. There are no pending disciplinary proceedings against me in any state or federal court.
42
+ - 4. I am a member in good standing of the bar of the State of Florida.
43
+
44
+ Case No. 1:19-cv-10476 (PGG)
45
+
46
+ DECLARATION OF SIGRID S. MCCAWLEY IN SUPPORT OF APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE
47
+
48
+ I hereby declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing statements are true and correct.
49
+
50
+ Dated: November 21, 2019 Respectfully Submitted,
51
+
52
+ /s/Sierid S. McCawlev
53
+
54
+ Sigrid S. McCawley Boies Schiller Flexner LLP 401 E. Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 1200 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Tel: (954) 356-0011 Fax: (954) 356 0022 Email: smccawley@bsfllp.com
55
+
56
+ Counsel for Plaintiff
57
+
58
+ # Supreme Court of Florida Certificate of Good Standing
59
+
60
+ *I JOHN A. TOMASINO, Clerk of the Supreme Court of the State of Florida, do hereby certify that*
61
+
62
+ **SIGRID [REDACTED] MCCAWLEY**
63
+
64
+ *was admitted as an attorney and counselor entitled to practice law in all the Courts of the State of Florida on November 6, 1997, is presently in good standing, and that the private and professional character of the attorney appear to be good.*
65
+
66
+ *WITNESS my hand and the Seal of the Supreme Court of Florida at Tallahassee, the Capital, this November 20, 2019.*
67
+
68
+ ![](_page_2_Picture_60.jpeg)
69
+
70
+ ![]()*Clerk of the Supreme Court of Florida.*
71
+
72
+ # UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
73
+
74
+ vs. Plaintiff, DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, in their capacities as the executors of the ESTATE OF JEFFREY EDWARD EPSTEIN, Defendants.
75
+
76
+ Case No. I :19-cv- 10476 (PGG)
77
+
78
+ ### ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE
79
+
80
+ The motion of Sigrid S. McCawley, for admission to practice Pro Hac Vice in the above captioned action is granted.
81
+
82
+ Applicant has declared that she is a member in good standing of the bar of the State of Florida; and that her contact information is as follows:
83
+
84
+ Sigrid S. McCawley Boies Schiller Flexner LLP 401 E. Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 1200 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Telephone: (954) 356-0011 Fax: (954) 356-0022 smccawley@bsfllp.com
85
+
86
+ Applicant having requested admission Pro Hac Vice to appear for all purposes as counsel for Plaintiff, in the above entitled action;
87
+
88
+ IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Applicant is admitted to practice Pro Hac Vice in the above captioned case in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
89
+
90
+ All attorneys appearing before this Court are subject to the Local Rules of this Court, including the Rules governing discipline of attorneys.
91
+
92
+ Dated:
93
+
94
+ United States District Judge
marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819124/EFTA02819124.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,367 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819124.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 5,
15
+ "chars": 4087,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 3.8,
17
+ "image_assets": [
18
+ "_page_2_Picture_60.jpeg"
19
+ ],
20
+ "marker_metadata": {
21
+ "table_of_contents": [
22
+ {
23
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK",
24
+ "heading_level": null,
25
+ "page_id": 0,
26
+ "polygon": [
27
+ [
28
+ 194.61599999999999,
29
+ 72.08999999999999
30
+ ],
31
+ [
32
+ 418.09381103515625,
33
+ 72.08999999999999
34
+ ],
35
+ [
36
+ 418.09381103515625,
37
+ 101.2330322265625
38
+ ],
39
+ [
40
+ 194.61599999999999,
41
+ 101.2330322265625
42
+ ]
43
+ ]
44
+ },
45
+ {
46
+ "title": "MOTION FOR ADMISSION \nPRO HAC VICE",
47
+ "heading_level": null,
48
+ "page_id": 0,
49
+ "polygon": [
50
+ [
51
+ 343.33200000000005,
52
+ 200.88
53
+ ],
54
+ [
55
+ 488.01629638671875,
56
+ 200.88
57
+ ],
58
+ [
59
+ 488.01629638671875,
60
+ 226.863037109375
61
+ ],
62
+ [
63
+ 343.33200000000005,
64
+ 226.863037109375
65
+ ]
66
+ ]
67
+ },
68
+ {
69
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK",
70
+ "heading_level": null,
71
+ "page_id": 1,
72
+ "polygon": [
73
+ [
74
+ 192.78000000000003,
75
+ 71.28
76
+ ],
77
+ [
78
+ 418.5074768066406,
79
+ 71.28
80
+ ],
81
+ [
82
+ 418.5074768066406,
83
+ 101.2330322265625
84
+ ],
85
+ [
86
+ 192.78000000000003,
87
+ 101.2330322265625
88
+ ]
89
+ ]
90
+ },
91
+ {
92
+ "title": "Supreme Court of Florida Certificate of Good Standing",
93
+ "heading_level": null,
94
+ "page_id": 2,
95
+ "polygon": [
96
+ [
97
+ 112.608,
98
+ 103.68
99
+ ],
100
+ [
101
+ 496.33200000000005,
102
+ 103.68
103
+ ],
104
+ [
105
+ 496.33200000000005,
106
+ 179.82
107
+ ],
108
+ [
109
+ 112.608,
110
+ 179.82
111
+ ]
112
+ ]
113
+ },
114
+ {
115
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK",
116
+ "heading_level": null,
117
+ "page_id": 3,
118
+ "polygon": [
119
+ [
120
+ 192.78000000000003,
121
+ 71.28
122
+ ],
123
+ [
124
+ 418.5074768066406,
125
+ 71.28
126
+ ],
127
+ [
128
+ 418.5074768066406,
129
+ 101.2330322265625
130
+ ],
131
+ [
132
+ 192.78000000000003,
133
+ 101.2330322265625
134
+ ]
135
+ ]
136
+ },
137
+ {
138
+ "title": "ORDER FOR ADMISSION \nPRO HAC VICE",
139
+ "heading_level": null,
140
+ "page_id": 3,
141
+ "polygon": [
142
+ [
143
+ 342.72,
144
+ 213.03000000000003
145
+ ],
146
+ [
147
+ 492.66168212890625,
148
+ 213.03000000000003
149
+ ],
150
+ [
151
+ 492.66168212890625,
152
+ 241.4830322265625
153
+ ],
154
+ [
155
+ 342.72,
156
+ 241.4830322265625
157
+ ]
158
+ ]
159
+ }
160
+ ],
161
+ "page_stats": [
162
+ {
163
+ "page_id": 0,
164
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
165
+ "block_counts": [
166
+ [
167
+ "Span",
168
+ 60
169
+ ],
170
+ [
171
+ "Line",
172
+ 31
173
+ ],
174
+ [
175
+ "Text",
176
+ 13
177
+ ],
178
+ [
179
+ "SectionHeader",
180
+ 2
181
+ ],
182
+ [
183
+ "PageHeader",
184
+ 1
185
+ ],
186
+ [
187
+ "PageFooter",
188
+ 1
189
+ ]
190
+ ],
191
+ "block_metadata": {
192
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
193
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
194
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
195
+ "previous_text": "",
196
+ "previous_type": "",
197
+ "previous_order": 0
198
+ }
199
+ },
200
+ {
201
+ "page_id": 1,
202
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
203
+ "block_counts": [
204
+ [
205
+ "Span",
206
+ 63
207
+ ],
208
+ [
209
+ "Line",
210
+ 32
211
+ ],
212
+ [
213
+ "Text",
214
+ 13
215
+ ],
216
+ [
217
+ "ListItem",
218
+ 4
219
+ ],
220
+ [
221
+ "PageHeader",
222
+ 1
223
+ ],
224
+ [
225
+ "SectionHeader",
226
+ 1
227
+ ],
228
+ [
229
+ "ListGroup",
230
+ 1
231
+ ],
232
+ [
233
+ "PageFooter",
234
+ 1
235
+ ]
236
+ ],
237
+ "block_metadata": {
238
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
239
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
240
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
241
+ "previous_text": "",
242
+ "previous_type": "",
243
+ "previous_order": 0
244
+ }
245
+ },
246
+ {
247
+ "page_id": 2,
248
+ "text_extraction_method": "surya",
249
+ "block_counts": [
250
+ [
251
+ "Span",
252
+ 29
253
+ ],
254
+ [
255
+ "Line",
256
+ 15
257
+ ],
258
+ [
259
+ "Text",
260
+ 11
261
+ ],
262
+ [
263
+ "PageHeader",
264
+ 2
265
+ ],
266
+ [
267
+ "SectionHeader",
268
+ 2
269
+ ],
270
+ [
271
+ "Picture",
272
+ 2
273
+ ],
274
+ [
275
+ "PageFooter",
276
+ 2
277
+ ],
278
+ [
279
+ "Caption",
280
+ 1
281
+ ]
282
+ ],
283
+ "block_metadata": {
284
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
285
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
286
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
287
+ "previous_text": "",
288
+ "previous_type": "",
289
+ "previous_order": 0
290
+ }
291
+ },
292
+ {
293
+ "page_id": 3,
294
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
295
+ "block_counts": [
296
+ [
297
+ "Span",
298
+ 57
299
+ ],
300
+ [
301
+ "Line",
302
+ 29
303
+ ],
304
+ [
305
+ "Text",
306
+ 7
307
+ ],
308
+ [
309
+ "SectionHeader",
310
+ 2
311
+ ],
312
+ [
313
+ "PageFooter",
314
+ 2
315
+ ],
316
+ [
317
+ "PageHeader",
318
+ 1
319
+ ]
320
+ ],
321
+ "block_metadata": {
322
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
323
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
324
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
325
+ "previous_text": "",
326
+ "previous_type": "",
327
+ "previous_order": 0
328
+ }
329
+ },
330
+ {
331
+ "page_id": 4,
332
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
333
+ "block_counts": [
334
+ [
335
+ "Span",
336
+ 13
337
+ ],
338
+ [
339
+ "Line",
340
+ 7
341
+ ],
342
+ [
343
+ "Text",
344
+ 3
345
+ ],
346
+ [
347
+ "PageFooter",
348
+ 2
349
+ ],
350
+ [
351
+ "PageHeader",
352
+ 1
353
+ ]
354
+ ],
355
+ "block_metadata": {
356
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
357
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
358
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
359
+ "previous_text": "",
360
+ "previous_type": "",
361
+ "previous_order": 0
362
+ }
363
+ }
364
+ ],
365
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02819124"
366
+ }
367
+ }
marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819124/_page_2_Picture_60.jpeg ADDED

Git LFS Details

  • SHA256: b8abe0efe62792c92e0059818b5ab9a8d8f8ad31a4ba27b54aa3cff2bbd4309b
  • Pointer size: 130 Bytes
  • Size of remote file: 16.9 kB
marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819129/EFTA02819129.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YO
2
+
3
+ vs. Plaintiff, DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, in their capacities as the executors of the ESTATE OF JEFFREY EDWARD EPSTEIN, Defendants.
4
+
5
+ USDC SDNY
6
+ DOCUMENT
7
+ ELECTRONICALLY FILED
8
+ DOC #: \_\_\_\_\_
9
+ DATE FILED: 11/25/19
10
+
11
+ Case No. 1:1 9-cv- 10476 (PGG)
12
+
13
+ ## ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE
14
+
15
+ The motion of Sigrid S. McCawley, for admission to practice Pro Hac Vice in the above captioned action is granted.
16
+
17
+ Applicant has declared that she is a member in good standing of the bar of the State of Florida; and that her contact information is as follows:
18
+
19
+ Sigrid S. McCawley Boies Schiller Flexner LLP 401 E. Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 1200 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Telephone: (954) 356-0011 Fax: (954) 356-0022 smccawlev@bsflIp.com
20
+
21
+ Applicant having requested admission Pro Hac Vice to appear for all purposes as counsel for Plaintiff, in the above entitled action;
22
+
23
+ IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Applicant is admitted to practice Pro Hac Vice in the above captioned case in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
24
+
25
+ All attorneys appearing before this Court are subject to the Local Rules of this Court, including the Rules governing discipline of attorneys.
26
+
27
+ Dated: 11/25/19
28
+
29
+ ![]()DEBRA FREEMAN
30
+ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
31
+ SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819129/EFTA02819129.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,139 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819129.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 2,
15
+ "chars": 1356,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 2.66,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YO",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 194.00400000000002,
27
+ 80.19
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 400.248,
31
+ 80.19
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 400.248,
35
+ 108.978515625
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 194.00400000000002,
39
+ 108.978515625
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "ORDER FOR ADMISSION \nPRO HAC VICE",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 338.43600000000004,
50
+ 217.07999999999998
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 482.03851318359375,
54
+ 217.07999999999998
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 482.03851318359375,
58
+ 243.5985107421875
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 338.43600000000004,
62
+ 243.5985107421875
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ }
66
+ ],
67
+ "page_stats": [
68
+ {
69
+ "page_id": 0,
70
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
71
+ "block_counts": [
72
+ [
73
+ "Span",
74
+ 78
75
+ ],
76
+ [
77
+ "Line",
78
+ 34
79
+ ],
80
+ [
81
+ "Text",
82
+ 7
83
+ ],
84
+ [
85
+ "SectionHeader",
86
+ 2
87
+ ],
88
+ [
89
+ "PageFooter",
90
+ 2
91
+ ],
92
+ [
93
+ "PageHeader",
94
+ 1
95
+ ],
96
+ [
97
+ "Form",
98
+ 1
99
+ ]
100
+ ],
101
+ "block_metadata": {
102
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
103
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
104
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
105
+ "previous_text": "",
106
+ "previous_type": "",
107
+ "previous_order": 0
108
+ }
109
+ },
110
+ {
111
+ "page_id": 1,
112
+ "text_extraction_method": "surya",
113
+ "block_counts": [
114
+ [
115
+ "Text",
116
+ 8
117
+ ],
118
+ [
119
+ "PageFooter",
120
+ 4
121
+ ],
122
+ [
123
+ "PageHeader",
124
+ 2
125
+ ]
126
+ ],
127
+ "block_metadata": {
128
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
129
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
130
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
131
+ "previous_text": "",
132
+ "previous_type": "",
133
+ "previous_order": 0
134
+ }
135
+ }
136
+ ],
137
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02819129"
138
+ }
139
+ }
marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819131/EFTA02819131.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ **UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT**for theSouthern District of New York![]()**WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS**To: David Boies*(Name of the plaintiff's attorney or unrepresented plaintiff)*I have received your request to waive service of a summons in this action along with a copy of the complaint, two copies of this waiver form, and a prepaid means of returning one signed copy of the form to you.
2
+
3
+ I, or the entity I represent, agree to save the expense of serving a summons and complaint in this case.
4
+
5
+ I understand that I, or the entity I represent, will keep all defenses or objections to the lawsuit, the court's jurisdiction, and the venue of the action, but that I waive any objections to the absence of a summons or of service.
6
+
7
+ I also understand that I, or the entity I represent, must file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 within 60 days from 11/25/19, the date when this request was sent (or 90 days if it was sent outside the United States). If I fail to do so, a default judgment will be entered against me or the entity I represent.
8
+
9
+ Date: 11/25/19![]()*Signature of the attorney or unrepresented party*Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn
10
+ *Printed name of party waiving service of summons*
11
+
12
+ Bennet Moskowitz
13
+ *Printed name*
14
+
15
+ Troutman Sanders LLP, 875 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10022
16
+ *Address*
17
+
18
+ Bennet.Moskowitz@troutman.com
19
+ *E-mail address*
20
+
21
+ (212) 704-6087
22
+ *Telephone number*
23
+
24
+ **Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons**Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires certain defendants to cooperate in saving unnecessary expenses of serving a summons and complaint. A defendant who is located in the United States and who fails to return a signed waiver of service requested by a plaintiff located in the United States will be required to pay the expenses of service, unless the defendant shows good cause for the failure.
25
+
26
+ "Good cause" does *not* include a belief that the lawsuit is groundless, or that it has been brought in an improper venue, or that the court has no jurisdiction over this matter or over the defendant or the defendant's property.
27
+
28
+ If the waiver is signed and returned, you can still make these and all other defenses and objections, but you cannot object to the absence of a summons or of service.
29
+
30
+ If you waive service, then you must, within the time specified on the waiver form, serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 on the plaintiff and file a copy with the court. By signing and returning the waiver form, you are allowed more time to respond than if a summons had been served.
marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819131/EFTA02819131.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819131.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 1,
15
+ "chars": 2572,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 117.37,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 178.704,
27
+ 79.38
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 439.41599999999994,
31
+ 79.38
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 439.41599999999994,
35
+ 98.01
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 178.704,
39
+ 98.01
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "WAIVER OF THE SERVICE OF SUMMONS",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 200.73600000000002,
50
+ 217.07999999999998
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 416.77200000000005,
54
+ 217.07999999999998
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 416.77200000000005,
58
+ 228.41999999999996
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 200.73600000000002,
62
+ 228.41999999999996
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ },
66
+ {
67
+ "title": "Duty to Avoid Unnecessary Expenses of Serving a Summons",
68
+ "heading_level": null,
69
+ "page_id": 0,
70
+ "polygon": [
71
+ [
72
+ 194.61599999999999,
73
+ 590.49
74
+ ],
75
+ [
76
+ 421.66799999999995,
77
+ 590.49
78
+ ],
79
+ [
80
+ 421.66799999999995,
81
+ 601.8299999999999
82
+ ],
83
+ [
84
+ 194.61599999999999,
85
+ 601.8299999999999
86
+ ]
87
+ ]
88
+ }
89
+ ],
90
+ "page_stats": [
91
+ {
92
+ "page_id": 0,
93
+ "text_extraction_method": "surya",
94
+ "block_counts": [
95
+ [
96
+ "Span",
97
+ 93
98
+ ],
99
+ [
100
+ "Text",
101
+ 47
102
+ ],
103
+ [
104
+ "Line",
105
+ 40
106
+ ],
107
+ [
108
+ "SectionHeader",
109
+ 6
110
+ ],
111
+ [
112
+ "PageHeader",
113
+ 3
114
+ ],
115
+ [
116
+ "PageFooter",
117
+ 2
118
+ ]
119
+ ],
120
+ "block_metadata": {
121
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
122
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
123
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
124
+ "previous_text": "",
125
+ "previous_type": "",
126
+ "previous_order": 0
127
+ }
128
+ }
129
+ ],
130
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02819131"
131
+ }
132
+ }
marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819132/EFTA02819132.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ## VIA ECF
2
+
3
+ The Honorable Debra Freeman Daniel Moynihan United States Courthouse 500 Pearl St. New York, NY 10007-1312
4
+
5
+ > Re: v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, in their capacities as executors of the Estate ofJeffity Edward Epstein, 19-10479 Jane Doe 1000 v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, in their capacities as executors o the Estate ofJetey Edward Epstein, 19-10577 v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, in their capacities as executors of the Estate of Jeji•ey Edward Epstein, and Ghislaine Maxwell, 19- 10475 v. Darren K Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, in their capacities as executors of the Estate of Jeffiey Edward Epstein, 19-10476
6
+
7
+ January 10, 2020
8
+
9
+ Dear Judge Freeman:
10
+
11
+ Pursuant to the Court's request at the November 21, 2019, Case Management Conference, Plaintiffs and Defendants Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, jointly submit this letter to provide the Court with an update as to the progress of discussions regarding both discovery and settlement.
12
+
13
+ The parties have thus far engaged in two productive conferences pursuant to Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. During those conferences, the parties agreed to exchange initial disclosures by January 23, 2020, and to exchange discovery plans one week thereafter, on January 30, 2020.
14
+
15
+ As the Court is aware, Defendants have arranged for a Victims' Compensation Program that will be available to Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs' counsel has conferred with the Program's designers and administrators, the Program's administrators provided Plaintiffs with a proposed protocol for the Program, and Plaintiffs have provided some feedback to the administrators. The motion for the Superior Court of the United States Virgin Islands to approve the establishment of the Program will be heard on February 4, 2020.
16
+
17
+ The parties request a conference with the Court on February 6 or 7, 2020, to resolve any potential disagreements as to how these matters should proceed. The parties will provide the Court with their proposed discovery plan(s) 48 hours before any such conference.
18
+
19
+ Respectfully submitted,
20
+
21
+ /s/ Joshua I. Schiller
22
+
23
+ David Boies, Esq. Joshua I. Schiller, Esq. Sigrid S. McCawley, Esq. Boies Schiller Flexner LLP
24
+
25
+ /s/ Bennet J. Moskowitz
26
+
27
+ Bennet J. Moskowitz, Esq. Troutman Sanders LLP
28
+
29
+ cc: Counsel of Record (via ECF)
marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819132/EFTA02819132.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,120 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819132.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 2,
15
+ "chars": 2359,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 0.73,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "VIA ECF",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 68.544,
27
+ 112.59
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 124.17080688476562,
31
+ 112.59
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 124.17080688476562,
35
+ 127.863037109375
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 68.544,
39
+ 127.863037109375
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ }
43
+ ],
44
+ "page_stats": [
45
+ {
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
48
+ "block_counts": [
49
+ [
50
+ "Span",
51
+ 89
52
+ ],
53
+ [
54
+ "Line",
55
+ 43
56
+ ],
57
+ [
58
+ "Text",
59
+ 8
60
+ ],
61
+ [
62
+ "PageFooter",
63
+ 3
64
+ ],
65
+ [
66
+ "PageHeader",
67
+ 2
68
+ ],
69
+ [
70
+ "SectionHeader",
71
+ 1
72
+ ]
73
+ ],
74
+ "block_metadata": {
75
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
76
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
77
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
78
+ "previous_text": "",
79
+ "previous_type": "",
80
+ "previous_order": 0
81
+ }
82
+ },
83
+ {
84
+ "page_id": 1,
85
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
86
+ "block_counts": [
87
+ [
88
+ "Span",
89
+ 27
90
+ ],
91
+ [
92
+ "Line",
93
+ 13
94
+ ],
95
+ [
96
+ "Text",
97
+ 6
98
+ ],
99
+ [
100
+ "PageHeader",
101
+ 2
102
+ ],
103
+ [
104
+ "PageFooter",
105
+ 1
106
+ ]
107
+ ],
108
+ "block_metadata": {
109
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
110
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
111
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
112
+ "previous_text": "",
113
+ "previous_type": "",
114
+ "previous_order": 0
115
+ }
116
+ }
117
+ ],
118
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02819132"
119
+ }
120
+ }
marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819134/EFTA02819134.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ The Clerk of Court of the Southern District of New York is directed to docket the within ORDER in each of the following actions:
2
+
3
+ VE v. Nine East 71st Street et al., No. 1:19-cv-07625 (AJN) (DF)
4
+
5
+ Katlyn Doe v. Indyke et at, No. 1:19-cv-07771 (PKC) (DF)
6
+
7
+ Priscilla Doe v. Indyke et al., No. 1:19-cv-07772 (ALC) (DF)
8
+
9
+ Lisa Doe v. Indyke et al., No. 1:19-cv-07773 (ER) (DF)
10
+
11
+ Jane Doe v. Indyke et al., No. I :19-cv-08673 (KPF) (DF)
12
+
13
+ v. Indyke et al, No. 1:19-cv-10475 (LGS) (DF)
14
+
15
+ v. Indyke et al, No. 1:19-cv-10476 (PGG) (DF)
16
+
17
+ v. Indyke et al, No. 1:19-cv-10479 (ALC) (DF)
18
+
19
+ Jane Doe 1000 v. Indyke et al., No. 1:19-cv-10577 (LGS) (DF)
20
+
21
+ Jane Doe 15 v. Indyke et al., No. I :19-cv-10653 (PAE) (DF)
22
+
23
+ Mary Doe v. Indyke et al, No. 1:19-cv-I 0758 (PAE) (DF)
24
+
25
+ v. Indyke et al, No. 1:19-cv-10788 (GHW) (DF)
26
+
27
+ Anastasia Doe v. Indyke et al, No. 1:19-cv-11869 (MN) (DF)
28
+
29
+ ![](_page_0_Picture_15.jpeg)
30
+
31
+ ## DEBRA FREEMAN, United States Magistrate Judge:
32
+
33
+ The above-referenced cases — all brought by plaintiffs claiming that they were sexually abused by Jeffrey Epstein and seeking damages from his estate — have been neither consolidated for any purpose, nor designated as "related" by the Court. Nonetheless, these cases (together with certain other, similar cases, not listed above) have been referred to the undersigned for general pretrial supervision, so that discovery — and potentially settlement — may be coordinated as reasonable. While, at the parties' request, discovery in the other Jeffrey Epstein cases referred to this Court has been stayed pending a further report on the parties' settlement efforts, the parties to each of the above-referenced cases have requested, by submissions dated January 10, 2020, that this Court set a discovery schedule. This Court's having reviewed the parties' submissions, it is hereby ORDERED that:
34
+
35
+ 1. In each of the above-referenced cases in which the parties have not yet submitted a jointly proposed discovery plan pursuant to Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties are directed to submit a proposed discovery schedule for this Court's review no later
36
+
37
+ than February 6, 2020. This submission should address all of the matters set out in Rule 26(f)(3), and should specifically include proposed deadlines for:
38
+
39
+ - a service of initial disclosures under Rule 26(a)(1);
40
+ - b. service of initial document requests and interrogatories;
41
+ - c. any motion for joinder of other parties or amendment of the pleadings;
42
+ - d. completion of fact discovery; and
43
+ - e. expert disclosures and the completion of expert discovery, if any.
44
+
45
+ 2. As to each of the above-referenced cases, this Court will hold a pretrial conference pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on February 11, 2020, at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom 17A at the United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007. The parties should be aware, however, that the mere fact that this Court will be holding a single, joint case-management conference does not necessarily mean that this Court will set an identical discovery schedule in each case. At the conference, counsel should be prepared to address whether there are reasons why these cases should be treated differently for scheduling purposes.
46
+
47
+ Dated: New York, New York January 14, 2019
48
+
49
+ SO ORDERED
50
+
51
+ dela A9-7 DEBRA FREEMAN United States Magistrate Judge
52
+
53
+ Copies to:
54
+
55
+ All counsel in the above-referenced cases (via ECF)
marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819134/EFTA02819134.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,134 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819134.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 2,
15
+ "chars": 3408,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 1.04,
17
+ "image_assets": [
18
+ "_page_0_Picture_15.jpeg"
19
+ ],
20
+ "marker_metadata": {
21
+ "table_of_contents": [
22
+ {
23
+ "title": "DEBRA FREEMAN, United States Magistrate Judge:",
24
+ "heading_level": null,
25
+ "page_id": 0,
26
+ "polygon": [
27
+ [
28
+ 68.544,
29
+ 336.15
30
+ ],
31
+ [
32
+ 350.9979553222656,
33
+ 336.15
34
+ ],
35
+ [
36
+ 350.9979553222656,
37
+ 352.4830322265625
38
+ ],
39
+ [
40
+ 68.544,
41
+ 352.4830322265625
42
+ ]
43
+ ]
44
+ }
45
+ ],
46
+ "page_stats": [
47
+ {
48
+ "page_id": 0,
49
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
50
+ "block_counts": [
51
+ [
52
+ "Span",
53
+ 62
54
+ ],
55
+ [
56
+ "Line",
57
+ 31
58
+ ],
59
+ [
60
+ "Text",
61
+ 16
62
+ ],
63
+ [
64
+ "PageHeader",
65
+ 1
66
+ ],
67
+ [
68
+ "Picture",
69
+ 1
70
+ ],
71
+ [
72
+ "SectionHeader",
73
+ 1
74
+ ],
75
+ [
76
+ "PageFooter",
77
+ 1
78
+ ]
79
+ ],
80
+ "block_metadata": {
81
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
82
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
83
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
84
+ "previous_text": "",
85
+ "previous_type": "",
86
+ "previous_order": 0
87
+ }
88
+ },
89
+ {
90
+ "page_id": 1,
91
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
92
+ "block_counts": [
93
+ [
94
+ "Span",
95
+ 52
96
+ ],
97
+ [
98
+ "Line",
99
+ 26
100
+ ],
101
+ [
102
+ "Text",
103
+ 7
104
+ ],
105
+ [
106
+ "ListItem",
107
+ 5
108
+ ],
109
+ [
110
+ "PageFooter",
111
+ 2
112
+ ],
113
+ [
114
+ "PageHeader",
115
+ 1
116
+ ],
117
+ [
118
+ "ListGroup",
119
+ 1
120
+ ]
121
+ ],
122
+ "block_metadata": {
123
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
124
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
125
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
126
+ "previous_text": "",
127
+ "previous_type": "",
128
+ "previous_order": 0
129
+ }
130
+ }
131
+ ],
132
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02819134"
133
+ }
134
+ }
marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819134/_page_0_Picture_15.jpeg ADDED

Git LFS Details

  • SHA256: 7c337c290a0fd14b0f2fd14bf01cc76d790988c99466fa69bcf69223a442049c
  • Pointer size: 130 Bytes
  • Size of remote file: 25 kB
marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819136/EFTA02819136.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ Bennet J. Moskowitz bennet.moskowitz@troutman.com
2
+
3
+ January 24, 2020
4
+
5
+ ECF
6
+
7
+ Hon. Paul G. Gardephe Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square, Room 2204 New York, New York 10007
8
+
9
+ Re: v. Darren K. lndyke and Richard D. Kahn, as Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, 1:19-cv-10476-PGG-DCF
10
+
11
+ Dear Judge Gardephe:
12
+
13
+ We represent Defendants Darren K. lndyke and Richard D. Kahn, Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (together, the "Co-Executors"), in the above-referenced action. We write pursuant to Your Honor's Individual Rules 1(A) and IV(A) to request a pre-motion conference on ors anticipated motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) to dismiss Plaintiff ("Plaintiff") Complaint (ECF No. 1) because it is time-barred, and Plaintiff's demand for punitive damages because it is prohibited as a matter of law.
14
+
15
+ ## 1. Plaintiff alleges Decedent assaulted Plaintiff in 2002 when she was 22 years old.
16
+
17
+ Plaintiff alleges that Mr. Epstein ("Decedent"), now deceased, sexually assaulted Plaintiff in 2002 in New York when she was 22. (Compl. ¶¶ 1, 11, 36, 49.) Plaintiff asserts two causes of action -- battery and intentional infliction of emotional distress -- and demands punitive damages. (Id. ¶¶ 57 — 66, p. 14.)
18
+
19
+ ## 2. Plaintiff's causes of action are time-barred.
20
+
21
+ The Complaint alleges torts that occurred in New York in 2002. (Compl. ¶¶ 1, 11, 36, 39, 49). Under New York law, causes of action sounding in battery must be commenced within one year of accrual (CPLR § 215(3)); and claims sounding in personal injury, within three years (CPLR § 214(5)). Therefore, Plaintiffs claims expired in 2005 at the latest.
22
+
23
+ ## 3. Plaintiff's attempts to plead around the statutes of limitations fail.
24
+
25
+ In apparent recognition her claims are time-barred, Plaintiff erroneously alleges that her claims are timely pursuant to CPLR § 215(8)(a), her claims were equitably tolled, and that the Co-Executors are equitably estopped from asserting a statute of limitations defense (Compl. at ¶¶ 12 - 14). Each of these arguments fails as a matter of law.
26
+
27
+ ---
28
+
29
+ First, CPLR § 215(8)(a) does not apply here. CPLR § 215(8)(a) provides: "Whenever it is shown that a criminal action against the same defendant has been commenced *with respect to the event or occurrence from which a claim governed by this section arises*, the plaintiff shall have at least one year from the termination of the criminal action ... to commence the civil action" (emphasis added).
30
+
31
+ Decedent's criminal indictment (the "Indictment"), which Plaintiff attaches to her Complaint, was not commenced with respect to Plaintiff. Rather, the Indictment alleges that Decedent sexually abused "*minor girls*" (Compl., Ex. A at ¶ 1 (emphasis added)), stating throughout that it concerns sex trafficking of "minors" (*Id.*, Ex. A at ¶¶ 2 - 4, 6, 8, 11- 15, 18 - 20, 22). Because Plaintiff alleges she was 22 when Decedent assaulted her (*Id.* ¶¶ 11, 36, 49), this action and the Indictment arise from different events or occurrences.
32
+
33
+ New York courts apply CPLR § 215(8)(a) narrowly. *See Christodoulou v. Terdeman*, 262 A.D.2d 595, 596 (2d Dept. 1999) (CPLR § 215(8)(a) applied only to claims based on events of February 26, 1993 and December 28, 1993, because it was only in connection with events of those two days that a criminal prosecution was commenced against defendant); *Gallina v. Thatcher*, No. 2017-52980, 2018 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 8435 (Sup. Ct. Dutchess Cnty. Oct. 23, 2018) (CPLR § 215(8)(a) inapplicable where incidents charged in criminal action and those alleged in civil action occurred on different dates); *McElligott v. City of N.Y.*, 15-cv-7107 (LGS), 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 201829, at \*13 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 7, 2017) (CPLR § 215(8)(a) inapplicable to claims against civil defendants not charged as co-defendants in criminal action, notwithstanding same events gave rise to both actions).
34
+
35
+ *Gallina* is especially instructive. In *Gallina*, an individual sued an attorney for battery and other claims based on the core allegation that, over the courts of 2 years, the attorney committed various sexual misconduct against the plaintiff including sexual assault. 2018 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 8435, at \*1. Defendant had also been criminally charged with forceable touching for incidents that occurred with the plaintiff in 2017. *Id.* at \*3. The court dismissed as time-barred plaintiff's battery counts based on incidents alleged to have occurred in 2016. *Id.* at \*2-3. The court rejected plaintiff's argument that CPLR § 215(8)(a) applied to the 2016 incidents, finding:
36
+
37
+ Plaintiff argues that the July and October 2016 incidents are part of the same ongoing course of events as the February, March and May 2017 incidents and should therefore be deemed timely commenced ... the case law does not support Plaintiff's interpretation of ... CPLR §215(8)(a). The criminal instruments ... demonstrate that Defendant was charged for incidents occurring on three (3) specific dates ... Pursuant to CPLR §215(8)(a), tolling would apply only to claims based on these dates, "because it was only in connection with the events of these [three] days that a criminal prosecution was commenced against the defendant." *Christodoulou v. Terdeman*, 262 AD2d 595, 596 [2d Dept. 1999]. As criminal charges were not commenced with respect to the July 2016 and October 2016 events, the tolling provisions of CPLR §215(8) do not apply. *Id.* at \*3-4.
38
+
39
+ Plaintiff asserts a much weaker connection between this action and the Indictment than the one unsuccessfully asserted by the plaintiff in *Gallina* (or the other cited cases). Therefore, the Court should reject Plaintiff's argument for the application of CPLR § 215(8)(a).
40
+
41
+ ---
42
+
43
+ Second, Plaintiff fails to meet her burden to allege extraordinary circumstances sufficient to justify tolling or equitable estoppel. Equitable tolling is only applied where a plaintiff is "prevented in some *extraordinary way* from exercising h[er] rights." *Viti v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am.*, 10-cv-2908 (ALC) (MHD), 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 189633, at \*30 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 5, 2012), *adopted by*, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 174145 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 11, 2013) (emphasis added) (citing ██████ v. *N.Y.C. Dep't of Corr.*, 09-civ-7639, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 137152, at \*2 (S.D.N.Y. 2010); ██████ v. *Nyack Hosp.*, 86 F.3d 8, 12 (2d Cir. 1996)). Under this doctrine, a court may, "under *compelling circumstances*, make *narrow exceptions* to the statute of limitations ... 'to prevent inequity.'" *Id.* (emphasis added) (citing *Yesh Diamonds, Inc. v. Yashaya*, No. 09-CV-2016 (DLI) (RER), 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101744, at \*2 (E.D.N.Y. 2010); *In re U.S. Lines, Inc.*, 318 F.3d 432, 436 (2d Cir. 2003)). "That the doctrine is to be employed only sparingly -- in '*extraordinary*' and '*compelling*' circumstances -- is reflected in the fact that the plaintiff bears the burden of persuasion to show that tolling is justified." *Id.* (emphasis added) (citing *Boos v. Runyon*, 201 F.3d 178, 185 (2d Cir. 2000)). A late-filing party seeking equitable tolling must also demonstrate she acted with "reasonable diligence" in pursuing her claims during the period she seeks to toll. *Id.* at \*32 (citation omitted).
44
+
45
+ Equitable estoppel only applies where a plaintiff knows her cause of action exists, but the defendant's conduct causes her to delay bringing suit. *See Yesh*, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101744, at \*5 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 27, 2010) (citing *Cerbone v. International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union*, 768 F.2d 45, 50 (2d Cir. 1985)). "The rationale behind this equitable doctrine is to protect the person who brings their action after it would normally be barred because she was 'lulled' into believing that she should delay pursuing her cause of action." *Id.* (quoting *In re Higgins*, 270 B.R. 147, 158 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2001)). Equitable estoppel requires a plaintiff to show: "(i) the defendant made a definite misrepresentation of fact, and had reason to believe that the plaintiff would rely on it; and (ii) the plaintiff reasonably relied on that misrepresentation to h[er] detriment." *Id.* (citation omitted). Tolling is inappropriate where, as here, a plaintiff fails to articulate any acts by a defendant that prevented the plaintiff from timely commencing suit. *See id.* at \*6.
46
+
47
+ Plaintiff does not allege any particularized acts by Decedent that prevented her from exercising her rights. (Compl. ¶¶ 13-14.) Nor has Plaintiff alleged (i) Decedent made a misrepresentation to her and had reason to believe she would rely on it, or (ii) Plaintiff reasonably relied on it to her detriment. There is no "*extraordinary*" basis alleged to toll the statute of limitations or estop the Co-Executors from asserting a statute of limitations defense.
48
+
49
+ #### **4. Plaintiff's claim for punitive damages fails as a matter of law.**
50
+
51
+ Courts in this District regularly grant motions to dismiss claims for punitive damages. *See, e.g., See, e.g., The Cookware Co. (USA), LLC v. Austin*, No. 15 Civ. 5796, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 177691, at \*17 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 8, 2016) (Batts, J.) (granting motion to dismiss claim for punitive damages without leave to replead because allegations regarding defendant's bad faith conduct were conclusory and did not rise to the required level of malice); *SJB v. N.Y.C. Dep't of Educ.*, No. 03 Civ. 6653, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13227, at \*25-26 (S.D.N.Y. July 14, 2004) (Buchwald, J.) (granting motion to dismiss punitive damages claims because punitive damages were not statutorily available); *Kunica v. St. Jean Fin.*, 97 Civ. 3804, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11867, at \*26 (S.D.N.Y. July 29, 1998) (Sweet, J.) (granting motion to dismiss claim for punitive damages because even if conduct alleged in complaint was true, it did not rise to the level necessary to
52
+
53
+ award punitive damages); v. Consumers Distrib. Co., 648 F. Supp. 980, 981, 984 (S.D.N.Y. 1986) (Cedarbaum, J.) (granting motion to dismiss claim for punitive damages).
54
+
55
+ Further, New York law applies to the issue of punitive damages because Plaintiff alleges the torts took place there. See Starr lndem. & Liab. Co. v. Am. Claims Mgmt., No. 14-cv-0463, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60272, \*7 (S.D.N.Y. May 7, 2015) ("Because punitive damages are conduct-regulating, 'the law of the jurisdiction where the tort occurred will generally apply."' (citations omitted)).
56
+
57
+ The New York Estates, Powers and Trusts Law bars Plaintiff's punitive damages claim: "For any injury, an action may be brought or continued against the personal representative of the decedent, but punitive damages shall not be awarded nor penalties adjudged in any such action brought to recover damages for personal injury." NY EPTL § 11-3.2 (a)(1) (emphasis added). That is the law in most U.S. jurisdictions, as reflected in the Restatement. See Restat. (Second) Of Torts § 908 cmt. a ("Punitive damages are not awarded against the representatives of a deceased tortfeasor."). "Also, 'there is a strong policy against the assessment of punitive gainst an estate on account of wrongful conduct of the decedent.- Graham v. , 224 F.R.D. 59, 63 (N.D.N.Y. 2004) (quoting Blissett v. Eisensmidt, 940 F. Supp. 449, 457 (N.D.N.Y. 1996)). Because there are no facts that would render Plaintiff's punitive damages claim proper, there is no reason to allow it to stand.
58
+
59
+ Respectfully submitted,
60
+
61
+ s/Bennet J. Moskowitz Bennet J. Moskowitz
marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819136/EFTA02819136.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,245 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819136.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 4,
15
+ "chars": 11378,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 13.72,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "1. Plaintiff alleges Decedent assaulted Plaintiff in 2002 when she was 22 years old.",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 88.12799999999999,
27
+ 454.4100000000001
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 529.6015014648438,
31
+ 454.4100000000001
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 529.6015014648438,
35
+ 469.4470520019531
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 88.12799999999999,
39
+ 469.4470520019531
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "2. Plaintiff's causes of action are time-barred.",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 88.12799999999999,
50
+ 541.8900000000001
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 336.6066589355469,
54
+ 541.8900000000001
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 336.6066589355469,
58
+ 556.8170471191406
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 88.12799999999999,
62
+ 556.8170471191406
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ },
66
+ {
67
+ "title": "3. Plaintiff's attempts to plead around the statutes of limitations fail.",
68
+ "heading_level": null,
69
+ "page_id": 0,
70
+ "polygon": [
71
+ [
72
+ 88.12799999999999,
73
+ 628.5600000000001
74
+ ],
75
+ [
76
+ 454.1536865234375,
77
+ 628.5600000000001
78
+ ],
79
+ [
80
+ 454.1536865234375,
81
+ 643.8170471191406
82
+ ],
83
+ [
84
+ 88.12799999999999,
85
+ 643.8170471191406
86
+ ]
87
+ ]
88
+ },
89
+ {
90
+ "title": "4. Plaintiff's claim for punitive damages fails as a matter of law.",
91
+ "heading_level": null,
92
+ "page_id": 2,
93
+ "polygon": [
94
+ [
95
+ 87.51599999999999,
96
+ 566.1899999999999
97
+ ],
98
+ [
99
+ 427.176,
100
+ 566.1899999999999
101
+ ],
102
+ [
103
+ 427.176,
104
+ 579.96
105
+ ],
106
+ [
107
+ 87.51599999999999,
108
+ 579.96
109
+ ]
110
+ ]
111
+ }
112
+ ],
113
+ "page_stats": [
114
+ {
115
+ "page_id": 0,
116
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
117
+ "block_counts": [
118
+ [
119
+ "Span",
120
+ 88
121
+ ],
122
+ [
123
+ "Line",
124
+ 42
125
+ ],
126
+ [
127
+ "Text",
128
+ 10
129
+ ],
130
+ [
131
+ "PageHeader",
132
+ 4
133
+ ],
134
+ [
135
+ "SectionHeader",
136
+ 3
137
+ ],
138
+ [
139
+ "PageFooter",
140
+ 2
141
+ ]
142
+ ],
143
+ "block_metadata": {
144
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
145
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
146
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
147
+ "previous_text": "",
148
+ "previous_type": "",
149
+ "previous_order": 0
150
+ }
151
+ },
152
+ {
153
+ "page_id": 1,
154
+ "text_extraction_method": "surya",
155
+ "block_counts": [
156
+ [
157
+ "Text",
158
+ 12
159
+ ],
160
+ [
161
+ "PageHeader",
162
+ 6
163
+ ],
164
+ [
165
+ "PageFooter",
166
+ 2
167
+ ]
168
+ ],
169
+ "block_metadata": {
170
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
171
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
172
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
173
+ "previous_text": "",
174
+ "previous_type": "",
175
+ "previous_order": 0
176
+ }
177
+ },
178
+ {
179
+ "page_id": 2,
180
+ "text_extraction_method": "surya",
181
+ "block_counts": [
182
+ [
183
+ "Text",
184
+ 8
185
+ ],
186
+ [
187
+ "PageHeader",
188
+ 6
189
+ ],
190
+ [
191
+ "SectionHeader",
192
+ 2
193
+ ],
194
+ [
195
+ "PageFooter",
196
+ 2
197
+ ]
198
+ ],
199
+ "block_metadata": {
200
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
201
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
202
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
203
+ "previous_text": "",
204
+ "previous_type": "",
205
+ "previous_order": 0
206
+ }
207
+ },
208
+ {
209
+ "page_id": 3,
210
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
211
+ "block_counts": [
212
+ [
213
+ "Span",
214
+ 54
215
+ ],
216
+ [
217
+ "Line",
218
+ 26
219
+ ],
220
+ [
221
+ "Text",
222
+ 5
223
+ ],
224
+ [
225
+ "PageHeader",
226
+ 3
227
+ ],
228
+ [
229
+ "PageFooter",
230
+ 1
231
+ ]
232
+ ],
233
+ "block_metadata": {
234
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
235
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
236
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
237
+ "previous_text": "",
238
+ "previous_type": "",
239
+ "previous_order": 0
240
+ }
241
+ }
242
+ ],
243
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02819136"
244
+ }
245
+ }
marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819140/EFTA02819140.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ January 29, 2020
2
+
3
+ **VIA ECF**
4
+
5
+ The Honorable Paul G. Gardephe
6
+ District Court Judge
7
+ United States District Court
8
+ Southern District of New York
9
+ 40 Foley Square
10
+ New York, NY 10007
11
+
12
+ **Re:** [REDACTED] v. *Indyke et al.*,
13
+ Case No. 19-cv-10476
14
+
15
+ Dear Judge Gardephe,
16
+
17
+ Pursuant to Individual Rule IV(A), Plaintiff [REDACTED] hereby responds to Defendants' request for a pre-motion conference in connection with their anticipated motion to dismiss. Dkt. 12. Plaintiff's claims are timely under New York's statutes of limitation and the doctrine of equitable estoppel, and Defendants' proposed motion "to dismiss" Plaintiff's request for punitive damages is procedurally improper. For the following reasons, the Court should deny Defendants' anticipated motion in its entirety.
18
+
19
+ **I. Plaintiff's Claims Are Timely Under New York Law.**
20
+
21
+ Plaintiff's claims are timely under New York's CPLR § 215(8)(a), which provides: "Whenever it is shown that a criminal action against the same defendant has been commenced with respect to the event or occurrence from which a claim governed by this section arises, *the plaintiff shall have at least one year from the termination of the criminal action* . . . to commence the civil action." (Emphasis added). Here, Epstein's criminal action in this District terminated on August 29, 2019. Compl. ¶ 35. Because Plaintiff filed the Complaint less than three months later, the action is timely under CPLR § 215(8)(a). Defendants' arguments against CPLR § 215(8)(a)'s application to these facts are meritless.
22
+
23
+ First, Defendants' argument that CPLR § 215(8)(a) does not apply because Plaintiff was not named as a victim in Epstein's indictment is incorrect. New York courts have held that CPLR § 215(8)(a) is "plain, clear and unambiguous" that it does *not* require that the plaintiff be "the victim or the specific person upon whom the crime had been committed." *Clemens v. Nealon*, 202 A.D.2d 747, 749 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994).
24
+
25
+ Second, Defendants' narrow construction of § 215(8)(a)'s "event or occurrence" language is improper, especially in light of the breadth of Epstein's indictment. The charges were not limited to crimes committed against specific victims. For example, the overt acts alleged for the sex trafficking conspiracy charge were enticing and recruiting multiple victims, "*including* minor victims identified herein." Compl., Ex. A (S.D.N.Y. Indictment) ¶ 22(a) (emphasis added). As another example, the Indictment's sex trafficking count charged Epstein with the sex trafficking
26
+
27
+ # BSF
28
+
29
+ of "numerous individuals . . . including but not limited to Minor Victim-I." Id. ¶ 24. Nor did the Indictment describe the sex trafficking conspiracy as exclusively targeting minor victims—it explicitly acknowledged that some victims were not underage at the time of the sexual abuse. Id. ¶ II ("[Epstein] knew that many of his New York victims were underage."). The Indictment was targeted at Epstein's sex-trafficking scheme as a whole, and that scheme is the event or occurrence from which Plaintiff's civil claims arose. Because Plaintiff's claims arise out of this common scheme, they fall within CPLR § 215(8)(a).
30
+
31
+ A recent Second Circuit opinion is instructive. In Kashef v. BNP Paribas S.A., the Court held that BNP Paribas's (BNPP) guilty plea conceding "knowledge of the atrocities being committed in Sudan and of the consequences of providing Sudan access to U.S. financial markets" allowed victims who were the victims of the atrocities in Sudan to bring a civil action against BNPP pursuant to § 215(8)(a). 925 F.3d 53, 56-57, 62 (2d Cir. 2019). The "event or occurrence" in that case, like the one here, was a broad scheme spanning many years, rather than a single event (such as the rape of one victim on a specified date). The Court therefore analyzed the "event or occurrence" on a general level as "BNPP's conspiracy with Sudan to violate U.S. sanctions" for humanitarian violations, id. at 62-63, and held that the victims of those humanitarian violations could bring claims subject to CPLR § 213(8Xa). Just as BNPP's general conspiracy to violate sanctions was the relevant event or occurrence in Kashef, Epstein's wide-spread sex trafficking scheme is the event or occurrence at issue in Plaintiff's case for the purposes of applying CPLR § 215(8Xa).
32
+
33
+ The cases Defendants cite are inapposite because the criminal charges in those cases were much narrower than Epstein's, and related to events that occurred on specified dates. See Christodoulou v. Terdeman, 262 A.D.2d 595, 596 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999) (prosecution commenced only in connection with events on February 26, 1993 and December 28, 1993); Gallina v. Thatcher, No. 2017-52980, 2018 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 8435, at •3 (Sup. Ct. Oct. 23, 2018) (indictment "charged [the defendant] for incidents occurring on three (3) specific dates"). Epstein's S.D.N.Y Indictment was much broader, covering sexual abuse that occurred "over the course of many years" "from at least in or about 2002, up to and including at least in or about 2005." S.D.N.Y. Indictment¶¶ 1-2, 8, 20, 24 (emphases added). Plaintiff's claims are therefore timely under CPLR § 215(8)(a) because the scheme the S.D.N.Y Indictment targeted is the event or occurrence from which Plaintiff's civil claims arise.
34
+
35
+ Finally, principles of statutory interpretation require the Court to construe CPLR § 215(8)(a) liberally. New York courts "liberally construe remedial statutes in favor of the intended beneficiaries and consider the mischief sought to be remedied and favor the construction which will suppress the evil and advance the remedy." Crucible Materials Corp. v. N.Y. Power Auth., 50 A.D.3d 1353, 1356 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008) (internal quotation marks omitted). Narrowly construing § 215(8Xa) to foreclose Plaintiff's claims as untimely would violate that principle.
36
+
37
+ ## II. Plaintiff Has Sufficiently Pled Facts Supporting Equitable Estoppel and Tolling.
38
+
39
+ Even if Plaintiff's claims were otherwise time-barred under New York's statutes of limitation (they are not), they would still be timely under the doctrine of equitable estoppel. Defendants assert that Plaintiff "fails to meet her burden to allege extraordinary circumstances sufficient to justify tolling or equitable estoppel." Dkt. 12 at 3. But the Complaint alleges in detail
40
+
41
+ ## BSF
42
+
43
+ the methods of intimidation and control that Jeffrey Epstein and his co-conspirators used to deter their victims from seeking justice. Equitable estoppel applies "where it would be unjust to allow a defendant to assert a statute of limitations defense," Zumpano v. Quinn, 849 N.E.2d 926, 929 (N.Y. 2006), due to "deception, concealment, threats, or other misconduct," Zoe G. v. Frederick F.G., 208 A.D.2d 675, 675 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994). The Complaint alleges that Epstein and his co-conspirators manipulated their victims using "financial power, promises, and threats to ensure that the victim returned as directed and remained compliant with their demands;" made clear to Plaintiff "that he was incredibly wealthy, powerful, and regularly in contact with world leaders;" and attempted to contact Plaintiff after her sexual assault. Compl. ¶9 26, 52, 53. The allegations concerning Epstein's purposeful silencing of his victims (and Plaintiff specifically) easily provide the requisite "extraordinary circumstances" for equitable tolling.
44
+
45
+ Because equitable estoppel and equitable tolling are fact-specific doctrines, Defendants' attempt to resolve the issue at motion to dismiss is inappropriate, and any motion challenging whether or not those doctrines apply should be reserved until after the parties have conducted discovery. See, e.g., Carelock v. United States, 2015 WL 5000816, at \*8 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 20, 2015).
46
+
47
+ ### III. The Court Should Address Punitive Damages After Discovery
48
+
49
+ Federal Rule 12(b)(6) allows a defendant to file a motion to dismiss for "failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted." Defendants' request for the Court to dismiss Plaintiff's claim for punitive damages does not relate to either of Plaintiff's clams (battery and intentional infliction of emotion distress) and does not relate to the sufficiency of the allegations in the Complaint. The issue of what type of damages to which Plaintiff is entitled should therefore be dealt with at a later stage of this litigation. See, e.g., Okyere v. Palisades Collection, LLC, 961 F. Supp. 2d 522, 536 (S.D.N.Y. 2013) (denying "motion to 'dismiss' plaintiff's request for punitive damages as procedurally premature").
50
+
51
+ Respectfully submitted,
52
+
53
+ /s/ Joshua I. Schiller
54
+
55
+ David Boies, Esq. Joshua I. Schiller, Esq. Sigrid S. McCawley, Esq.
56
+
57
+ cc: Counsel of Record (via ECF)
marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819140/EFTA02819140.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,269 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819140.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 3,
15
+ "chars": 8682,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 9.49,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "VIA ECF",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 68.544,
27
+ 133.65
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 122.4,
31
+ 133.65
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 122.4,
35
+ 147.42000000000002
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 68.544,
39
+ 147.42000000000002
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "I. Plaintiff's Claims Are Timely Under New York Law.",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 78.94800000000001,
50
+ 399.3299999999999
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 379.44,
54
+ 399.3299999999999
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 379.44,
58
+ 413.09999999999997
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 78.94800000000001,
62
+ 413.09999999999997
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ },
66
+ {
67
+ "title": "BSF",
68
+ "heading_level": null,
69
+ "page_id": 1,
70
+ "polygon": [
71
+ [
72
+ 32.436,
73
+ 27.7952880859375
74
+ ],
75
+ [
76
+ 115.85221099853516,
77
+ 27.7952880859375
78
+ ],
79
+ [
80
+ 115.85221099853516,
81
+ 70.41705322265625
82
+ ],
83
+ [
84
+ 32.436,
85
+ 70.41705322265625
86
+ ]
87
+ ]
88
+ },
89
+ {
90
+ "title": "II. Plaintiff Has Sufficiently Pled Facts Supporting Equitable Estoppel and Tolling.",
91
+ "heading_level": null,
92
+ "page_id": 1,
93
+ "polygon": [
94
+ [
95
+ 74.66399999999999,
96
+ 628.5600000000001
97
+ ],
98
+ [
99
+ 520.6857299804688,
100
+ 628.5600000000001
101
+ ],
102
+ [
103
+ 520.6857299804688,
104
+ 644.9830169677734
105
+ ],
106
+ [
107
+ 74.66399999999999,
108
+ 644.9830169677734
109
+ ]
110
+ ]
111
+ },
112
+ {
113
+ "title": "BSF",
114
+ "heading_level": null,
115
+ "page_id": 2,
116
+ "polygon": [
117
+ [
118
+ 32.436,
119
+ 28.4080810546875
120
+ ],
121
+ [
122
+ 115.3540267944336,
123
+ 28.4080810546875
124
+ ],
125
+ [
126
+ 115.3540267944336,
127
+ 69.8140869140625
128
+ ],
129
+ [
130
+ 32.436,
131
+ 69.8140869140625
132
+ ]
133
+ ]
134
+ },
135
+ {
136
+ "title": "III. The Court Should Address Punitive Damages After Discovery",
137
+ "heading_level": null,
138
+ "page_id": 2,
139
+ "polygon": [
140
+ [
141
+ 69.768,
142
+ 302.13
143
+ ],
144
+ [
145
+ 427.86114501953125,
146
+ 302.13
147
+ ],
148
+ [
149
+ 427.86114501953125,
150
+ 317.2330627441406
151
+ ],
152
+ [
153
+ 69.768,
154
+ 317.2330627441406
155
+ ]
156
+ ]
157
+ }
158
+ ],
159
+ "page_stats": [
160
+ {
161
+ "page_id": 0,
162
+ "text_extraction_method": "surya",
163
+ "block_counts": [
164
+ [
165
+ "Text",
166
+ 16
167
+ ],
168
+ [
169
+ "PageHeader",
170
+ 6
171
+ ],
172
+ [
173
+ "PageFooter",
174
+ 6
175
+ ],
176
+ [
177
+ "SectionHeader",
178
+ 4
179
+ ]
180
+ ],
181
+ "block_metadata": {
182
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
183
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
184
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
185
+ "previous_text": "",
186
+ "previous_type": "",
187
+ "previous_order": 0
188
+ }
189
+ },
190
+ {
191
+ "page_id": 1,
192
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
193
+ "block_counts": [
194
+ [
195
+ "Span",
196
+ 89
197
+ ],
198
+ [
199
+ "Line",
200
+ 45
201
+ ],
202
+ [
203
+ "Text",
204
+ 5
205
+ ],
206
+ [
207
+ "SectionHeader",
208
+ 2
209
+ ],
210
+ [
211
+ "PageHeader",
212
+ 1
213
+ ],
214
+ [
215
+ "PageFooter",
216
+ 1
217
+ ]
218
+ ],
219
+ "block_metadata": {
220
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
221
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
222
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
223
+ "previous_text": "",
224
+ "previous_type": "",
225
+ "previous_order": 0
226
+ }
227
+ },
228
+ {
229
+ "page_id": 2,
230
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
231
+ "block_counts": [
232
+ [
233
+ "Span",
234
+ 74
235
+ ],
236
+ [
237
+ "Line",
238
+ 33
239
+ ],
240
+ [
241
+ "Text",
242
+ 7
243
+ ],
244
+ [
245
+ "SectionHeader",
246
+ 2
247
+ ],
248
+ [
249
+ "PageHeader",
250
+ 1
251
+ ],
252
+ [
253
+ "PageFooter",
254
+ 1
255
+ ]
256
+ ],
257
+ "block_metadata": {
258
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
259
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
260
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
261
+ "previous_text": "",
262
+ "previous_type": "",
263
+ "previous_order": 0
264
+ }
265
+ }
266
+ ],
267
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02819140"
268
+ }
269
+ }
marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819143/EFTA02819143.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
2
+
3
+ Plaintiff,
4
+
5
+ - against -
6
+
7
+ DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, in their capacities as the executors of the ESTATE OF JEFFREY EDWARD EPSTEIN,
8
+
9
+ Defendants.
10
+
11
+ ## ORDER
12
+
13
+ 19 Civ. 10476 (PGG) (DCF)
14
+
15
+ PAUL G. GARDEPHE, U.S.D.J.:
16
+
17
+ It is hereby ORDERED that the following schedule will apply to Defendants'
18
+
19
+ motion to dismiss:
20
+
21
+ - 1. Defendants' motion is due on February 21, 2020;
22
+ - 2. Plaintiff's opposition is due on March 6, 2020; and
23
+ - 3. Defendants' reply, if any, is due on March 16, 2020.
24
+
25
+ The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate Dkt. No. 12.
26
+
27
+ Dated: New York, New York January74 2020
28
+
29
+ SO ORDERED.
30
+
31
+ United States District Judge
marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819143/EFTA02819143.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,121 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819143.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 1,
15
+ "chars": 690,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 0.83,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 68.544,
27
+ 74.52
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 280.7745056152344,
31
+ 74.52
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 280.7745056152344,
35
+ 102.86248779296875
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 68.544,
39
+ 102.86248779296875
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "ORDER",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 398.41200000000003,
50
+ 144.17999999999998
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 449.2979431152344,
54
+ 144.17999999999998
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 449.2979431152344,
58
+ 158.36248779296875
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 398.41200000000003,
62
+ 158.36248779296875
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ }
66
+ ],
67
+ "page_stats": [
68
+ {
69
+ "page_id": 0,
70
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
71
+ "block_counts": [
72
+ [
73
+ "Span",
74
+ 48
75
+ ],
76
+ [
77
+ "Line",
78
+ 24
79
+ ],
80
+ [
81
+ "Text",
82
+ 13
83
+ ],
84
+ [
85
+ "ListItem",
86
+ 3
87
+ ],
88
+ [
89
+ "SectionHeader",
90
+ 2
91
+ ],
92
+ [
93
+ "PageHeader",
94
+ 1
95
+ ],
96
+ [
97
+ "ListGroup",
98
+ 1
99
+ ],
100
+ [
101
+ "Caption",
102
+ 1
103
+ ],
104
+ [
105
+ "PageFooter",
106
+ 1
107
+ ]
108
+ ],
109
+ "block_metadata": {
110
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
111
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
112
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
113
+ "previous_text": "",
114
+ "previous_type": "",
115
+ "previous_order": 0
116
+ }
117
+ }
118
+ ],
119
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02819143"
120
+ }
121
+ }
marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819144/EFTA02819144.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
2
+
3
+ Plaintiff, CASE NO: 19-cv-10476-PGG-DCF
4
+
5
+ #### DISCOVERY PLAN
6
+
7
+ v.
8
+
9
+ DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, in their capacities as the executors of the ESTATE OF JEFFREY EDWARD EPSTEIN,
10
+
11
+ Defendants.
12
+
13
+ Pursuant to the Court's January 14, 2020, order (Dkt. 11), the parties submit the following report addressing the required topics under Rule 26(0(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure:
14
+
15
+ - (A)The parties have already exchanged initial disclosures.
16
+ - (B) Plaintiff seeks discovery as to Jeffrey Epstein's documents concerning
17
+ - a. The Plaintiffs;
18
+ - b. Mr. Epstein's sex-trafficking conspiracy;
19
+ - c. Visitors and/or passengers at any of Mr. Epstein's multiple residences or aircraft where the sex trafficking occurred;
20
+ - d. Communications between Mr. Epstein and his co-conspirators;
21
+ - e. Communications between Mr. Epstein and his employees;
22
+ - f. Communications between Mr. Epstein and any government official regardless of country;
23
+
24
+ - g. Mr. Epstein's flight logs and helicopter logs;
25
+ - h. Video tapes and photographs taken at Mr. Epstein's properties or on his planes;
26
+ - i. Financial records;
27
+ - j. Mr. Epstein's message pads and any phone call logs or phone/contact directories; and
28
+ - k. Amazon.com account details, including order history.
29
+
30
+ The Co-Executors preserve all of their discovery rights including the right to object to Plaintiff's discovery requests. The Co-Executors' position is that the general subjects of discovery in this action are: (1) Mr. Epstein's alleged abuse of Plaintiff; and (2) Plaintiff's alleged damages.
31
+
32
+ There is no need to conduct discovery in phases, or otherwise limit discovery to particular issues.
33
+
34
+ - (C) The parties shall confer and stipulate as to a protocol for the exchange of documents including the production of electronically stored information, no later than April 13, 2020. (D)— (F) There are no further issues requiring the Court's attention at this time.
35
+
36
+ A proposed scheduling order is attached hereto as Exhibit A. Where the parties are in disagreement regarding a particular deadline, their respective positions are noted.
37
+
38
+ Respectfully submitted,
39
+
40
+ Is/ Sigrid S. McCawley
41
+
42
+ David Boies, Esq.
43
+
44
+ Joshua I. Schiller, Esq.
45
+
46
+ Sigrid S. McCawley, Esq.
47
+
48
+ Is/ Bennet J. Moskowitz
49
+
50
+ Bennet J. Moskowitz, Esq.
51
+
52
+ cc: Counsel of Record (via ECF)
53
+
54
+ # EXHIBIT A
55
+
56
+ ### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
57
+
58
+ Plaintiff, CASE NO: 19-cv-10476-PGG-DCF
59
+
60
+ [PROPOSED] SCHEDULING ORDER
61
+
62
+ v.
63
+
64
+ DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, in their capacities as the executors of the ESTATE OF JEFFREY EDWARD EPSTEIN,
65
+
66
+ Defendants.
67
+
68
+ ## DEBRA FREEMAN, United States Magistrate Judge:
69
+
70
+ It is hereby ORDERED that:
71
+
72
+ - 1. Plaintiff's proposal: The parties shall serve their initial document requests and interrogatories no later than March 12, 2020. The Co-Executors' proposal: 30 days from the Court's entry of this Order.
73
+ - 2. The Co-Executors' proposal: Plaintiffs shall provide HIPAA-compliant medical records release authorizations to the Defendants no later than 14 days from Defendants' request. Plaintiff's position: Any request for HIPAA releases shall be by motion if the parties are unable to reach agreement without Court intervention, after discovery requests are served.
74
+ - 3. Any motions to amend the pleadings or to join any additional parties shall be filed no later than March 27, 2020.
75
+ - 4. The parties shall confer and stipulate as to a protocol regarding the production of documents and electronically stored information no later than April 13, 2020.
76
+
77
+ - 5. Plaintiff's proposal: All fact discovery shall be completed no later than June 10, 2020.
78
+
79
+ The Co-Executors' proposal: 160 days from the Court's entry of this Order.
80
+
81
+ - 6. Expert discovery shall be conducted on the following schedule:
82
+
83
+ - a. Plaintiff's proposal: Each party bearing the affirmative burden of proof on a claim or defense shall serve its expert report(s) with respect to that claim or defense no later than May 27, 2020. The Co-Executors' proposal: 190 days from the Court's entry of this Order (i.e., 30 days after the close of fact discovery).
84
+ - b. Rebuttal reports shall be served no later than June 26, 2020. The Co-Executors' proposal: 220 days from the Court's entry of this Order (i.e., 60 days after the close of fact discovery).
85
+ - c. Expert discovery shall be completed no later than July 27, 2020. The Co-Executors' proposal: 240 days from the Court's entry of this Order.
86
+
87
+ - 7. The parties may stipulate to modify interim deadlines in this Scheduling Order, without seeking prior leave of Court.
88
+
89
+ Dated: New York, New York
90
+
91
+ February 2020
92
+
93
+ SO ORDERED
94
+
95
+ DEBRA FREEMAN United States Magistrate Judge
96
+
97
+ Copies to:
98
+
99
+ All counsel (via ECF)
marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819144/EFTA02819144.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,350 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819144.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 5,
15
+ "chars": 4733,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 0.98,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 192.78000000000003,
27
+ 71.28
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 418.5074768066406,
31
+ 71.28
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 418.5074768066406,
35
+ 100.10302734375
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 192.78000000000003,
39
+ 100.10302734375
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "DISCOVERY PLAN",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 427.176,
50
+ 182.25
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 543.456,
54
+ 182.25
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 543.456,
58
+ 196.4830322265625
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 427.176,
62
+ 196.4830322265625
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ },
66
+ {
67
+ "title": "EXHIBIT A",
68
+ "heading_level": null,
69
+ "page_id": 2,
70
+ "polygon": [
71
+ [
72
+ 238.06800000000004,
73
+ 290.78999999999996
74
+ ],
75
+ [
76
+ 375.8517150878906,
77
+ 290.78999999999996
78
+ ],
79
+ [
80
+ 375.8517150878906,
81
+ 320.20709228515625
82
+ ],
83
+ [
84
+ 238.06800000000004,
85
+ 320.20709228515625
86
+ ]
87
+ ]
88
+ },
89
+ {
90
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK",
91
+ "heading_level": null,
92
+ "page_id": 3,
93
+ "polygon": [
94
+ [
95
+ 192.78000000000003,
96
+ 71.28
97
+ ],
98
+ [
99
+ 418.5074768066406,
100
+ 71.28
101
+ ],
102
+ [
103
+ 418.5074768066406,
104
+ 100.10302734375
105
+ ],
106
+ [
107
+ 192.78000000000003,
108
+ 100.10302734375
109
+ ]
110
+ ]
111
+ },
112
+ {
113
+ "title": "DEBRA FREEMAN, United States Magistrate Judge:",
114
+ "heading_level": null,
115
+ "page_id": 3,
116
+ "polygon": [
117
+ [
118
+ 68.544,
119
+ 360.45000000000005
120
+ ],
121
+ [
122
+ 352.4979248046875,
123
+ 360.45000000000005
124
+ ],
125
+ [
126
+ 352.4979248046875,
127
+ 375.7330322265625
128
+ ],
129
+ [
130
+ 68.544,
131
+ 375.7330322265625
132
+ ]
133
+ ]
134
+ }
135
+ ],
136
+ "page_stats": [
137
+ {
138
+ "page_id": 0,
139
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
140
+ "block_counts": [
141
+ [
142
+ "Span",
143
+ 49
144
+ ],
145
+ [
146
+ "Line",
147
+ 25
148
+ ],
149
+ [
150
+ "ListItem",
151
+ 8
152
+ ],
153
+ [
154
+ "Text",
155
+ 7
156
+ ],
157
+ [
158
+ "SectionHeader",
159
+ 2
160
+ ],
161
+ [
162
+ "PageFooter",
163
+ 2
164
+ ],
165
+ [
166
+ "PageHeader",
167
+ 1
168
+ ],
169
+ [
170
+ "ListGroup",
171
+ 1
172
+ ]
173
+ ],
174
+ "block_metadata": {
175
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
176
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
177
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
178
+ "previous_text": "",
179
+ "previous_type": "",
180
+ "previous_order": 0
181
+ }
182
+ },
183
+ {
184
+ "page_id": 1,
185
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
186
+ "block_counts": [
187
+ [
188
+ "Span",
189
+ 53
190
+ ],
191
+ [
192
+ "Line",
193
+ 27
194
+ ],
195
+ [
196
+ "Text",
197
+ 11
198
+ ],
199
+ [
200
+ "ListItem",
201
+ 6
202
+ ],
203
+ [
204
+ "ListGroup",
205
+ 2
206
+ ],
207
+ [
208
+ "PageFooter",
209
+ 2
210
+ ],
211
+ [
212
+ "PageHeader",
213
+ 1
214
+ ]
215
+ ],
216
+ "block_metadata": {
217
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
218
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
219
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
220
+ "previous_text": "",
221
+ "previous_type": "",
222
+ "previous_order": 0
223
+ }
224
+ },
225
+ {
226
+ "page_id": 2,
227
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
228
+ "block_counts": [
229
+ [
230
+ "Span",
231
+ 5
232
+ ],
233
+ [
234
+ "Line",
235
+ 3
236
+ ],
237
+ [
238
+ "PageHeader",
239
+ 1
240
+ ],
241
+ [
242
+ "SectionHeader",
243
+ 1
244
+ ],
245
+ [
246
+ "PageFooter",
247
+ 1
248
+ ]
249
+ ],
250
+ "block_metadata": {
251
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
252
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
253
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
254
+ "previous_text": "",
255
+ "previous_type": "",
256
+ "previous_order": 0
257
+ }
258
+ },
259
+ {
260
+ "page_id": 3,
261
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
262
+ "block_counts": [
263
+ [
264
+ "Span",
265
+ 47
266
+ ],
267
+ [
268
+ "Line",
269
+ 24
270
+ ],
271
+ [
272
+ "Text",
273
+ 8
274
+ ],
275
+ [
276
+ "ListItem",
277
+ 4
278
+ ],
279
+ [
280
+ "SectionHeader",
281
+ 2
282
+ ],
283
+ [
284
+ "PageHeader",
285
+ 1
286
+ ],
287
+ [
288
+ "ListGroup",
289
+ 1
290
+ ],
291
+ [
292
+ "PageFooter",
293
+ 1
294
+ ]
295
+ ],
296
+ "block_metadata": {
297
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
298
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
299
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
300
+ "previous_text": "",
301
+ "previous_type": "",
302
+ "previous_order": 0
303
+ }
304
+ },
305
+ {
306
+ "page_id": 4,
307
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
308
+ "block_counts": [
309
+ [
310
+ "Span",
311
+ 44
312
+ ],
313
+ [
314
+ "Line",
315
+ 23
316
+ ],
317
+ [
318
+ "Text",
319
+ 7
320
+ ],
321
+ [
322
+ "ListItem",
323
+ 6
324
+ ],
325
+ [
326
+ "ListGroup",
327
+ 4
328
+ ],
329
+ [
330
+ "PageHeader",
331
+ 1
332
+ ],
333
+ [
334
+ "PageFooter",
335
+ 1
336
+ ]
337
+ ],
338
+ "block_metadata": {
339
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
340
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
341
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
342
+ "previous_text": "",
343
+ "previous_type": "",
344
+ "previous_order": 0
345
+ }
346
+ }
347
+ ],
348
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02819144"
349
+ }
350
+ }
marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819149/EFTA02819149.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ The Clerk of Court of the Southern District of New York is directed to docket the within ORDER in each of the following actions:
2
+
3
+ USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILEIftallQ2a. VE v. Nine East 71st Street et al., No. 1:19-cv-07625 (AJN) (DF)
4
+
5
+ Katlyn Doe v. Indyke et aL, No. 1:19-cv-07771 (PKC) (DF)
6
+
7
+ Priscilla Doe v. Indyke et al., No. 1:19-cv-07772 (ALC) (DF)
8
+
9
+ Lisa Doe v. Indyke et al, No. 1:19-cv-07773 (ER) (DF)
10
+
11
+ Jane Doe v. Indyke et aL, No. 1:19-cv-08673 (KPF) (DF)
12
+
13
+ v. Indyke et aL, No. 1:19-cv-10475 (LGS) (DF)
14
+
15
+ v. Indyke et aL, No. 1:19-cv-10476 (PGG) (DF)
16
+
17
+ v. Indyke et aL, No. 1:19-cv-10479 (ALC) (DF)
18
+
19
+ Jane Doe 1000 v. Indyke et aL, No. 1:19-cv-10577 (LGS) (DF)
20
+
21
+ Jane Doe 15 v. Indyke et aL, No. 1:19-cv-10653 (PAE) (DF)
22
+
23
+ Mary Doe v. Indyke et aL, No. 1:19-cv-10758 (PAE) (DF)
24
+
25
+ v. Indyke et aL, No. 1:19-cv-10788 (O1-1W) (DF)
26
+
27
+ Anastasia Doe v. Indyke et aL, No. 1:19-cv-11869 (AJN) (DF)
28
+
29
+ ## DEBRA FREEMAN, United States Magistrate Judge:
30
+
31
+ The Court having held a case management conference on February 11, 2020, with counsel for all parties in the above-referenced cases, it is hereby ORDERED, as stated at the conference, that:
32
+
33
+ - 1. To the extent not already made, the parties shall make initial disclosures under Rule 26(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure no later than February 25, 2020.
34
+ - 2. The parties shall serve their initial document requests and interrogatories no later than March 10, 2020. In their initial interrogatories, the parties may, as reasonable, seek information outside the scope of Local Civil Rule 33.3(a).
35
+ - 3. Any motions to amend the pleadings or to join any additional parties shall be filed no later than April 30, 2020.
36
+ - 4. All fact discovery shall be completed no later than June 10, 2020.
37
+
38
+ - 5. Expert discovery shall be conducted on the following schedule:
39
+ - a. Plaintiffs' expert reports shall be served no later than June 10, 2020.
40
+ - b. Defendants' rebuttal reports shall be served no later than July 10, 2020.
41
+ - c. Expert discovery shall be completed no later than July 31, 2020.
42
+
43
+ 6. The parties may stipulate to modify interim deadlines in this Scheduling Order, without seeking prior leave of Court.
44
+
45
+ 7. The parties to the above-referenced cases shall submit joint status reports to the Court, regarding discovery and the progress of settlement discussions, no later than April 30, 2020.
46
+
47
+ Dated: New York, New York February 11, 2020
48
+
49
+ SO ORDERED
50
+
51
+ DEBRA FREEMAN United States Magistrate Judge
52
+
53
+ Copies to:
54
+
55
+ All counsel in the above-referenced cases (via ECF)
marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819149/EFTA02819149.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819149.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 2,
15
+ "chars": 2548,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 0.98,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "DEBRA FREEMAN, United States Magistrate Judge:",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 68.544,
27
+ 336.96
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 351.7479248046875,
31
+ 336.96
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 351.7479248046875,
35
+ 352.863037109375
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 68.544,
39
+ 352.863037109375
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ }
43
+ ],
44
+ "page_stats": [
45
+ {
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
48
+ "block_counts": [
49
+ [
50
+ "Span",
51
+ 67
52
+ ],
53
+ [
54
+ "Line",
55
+ 34
56
+ ],
57
+ [
58
+ "Text",
59
+ 16
60
+ ],
61
+ [
62
+ "ListItem",
63
+ 4
64
+ ],
65
+ [
66
+ "PageHeader",
67
+ 1
68
+ ],
69
+ [
70
+ "SectionHeader",
71
+ 1
72
+ ],
73
+ [
74
+ "ListGroup",
75
+ 1
76
+ ],
77
+ [
78
+ "PageFooter",
79
+ 1
80
+ ]
81
+ ],
82
+ "block_metadata": {
83
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
84
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
85
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
86
+ "previous_text": "",
87
+ "previous_type": "",
88
+ "previous_order": 0
89
+ }
90
+ },
91
+ {
92
+ "page_id": 1,
93
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
94
+ "block_counts": [
95
+ [
96
+ "Span",
97
+ 37
98
+ ],
99
+ [
100
+ "Line",
101
+ 19
102
+ ],
103
+ [
104
+ "Text",
105
+ 7
106
+ ],
107
+ [
108
+ "ListItem",
109
+ 4
110
+ ],
111
+ [
112
+ "PageFooter",
113
+ 2
114
+ ],
115
+ [
116
+ "PageHeader",
117
+ 1
118
+ ],
119
+ [
120
+ "ListGroup",
121
+ 1
122
+ ]
123
+ ],
124
+ "block_metadata": {
125
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
126
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
127
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
128
+ "previous_text": "",
129
+ "previous_type": "",
130
+ "previous_order": 0
131
+ }
132
+ }
133
+ ],
134
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02819149"
135
+ }
136
+ }
marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819151/EFTA02819151.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,163 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
2
+
3
+ X
4
+
5
+ Plaintiff,
6
+
7
+ v. Index No. 1:19-cv-10476-PGG-DCF
8
+
9
+ DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN in their capacities as the executors of the ESTATE OF JEFFREY EDWARD • EPSTEIN,
10
+
11
+ •
12
+
13
+ Defendants.
14
+
15
+ X
16
+
17
+ ## MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE
18
+
19
+ Pursuant to Rule 1.3 of the Local Rules of the United States Courts for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York, Mary "Molly" S. DiRago hereby moves this Court for an Order for admission to practice Pro Hac Vice to appear as counsel for Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn as Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (together, the "Co-Executors"), in the above-captioned action.
20
+
21
+ I am in good standing of the bar(s) of the state of Illinois and there are no pending disciplinary proceedings against me in any state or federal court. I have never been convicted of a felony. I have never been censured, suspended, disbarred or denied admission or readmission by any court. I have attached the affidavit pursuant to Local Rule 1.3.
22
+
23
+ Dated: February 13, 2020 Respectfully Submitted,
24
+
25
+ Is/ Mary "Molly" S. DiRago
26
+
27
+ Mary "Molly" S. DiRago (Pro Hac Vice Pending)
28
+
29
+ Troutman Sanders LLP
30
+
31
+ One North Wacker Drive, Suite 2905
32
+
33
+ Chicago, 60606
34
+
35
+ (312) 759-1926
36
+
37
+ (312) 759-1939 (Fax)
38
+
39
+ molly.dirago@troutman.com
40
+
41
+ Attorneys for Defendants Darren K. Indyke and
42
+
43
+ Richard D. Kahn, Co-Executors of the Estate of
44
+
45
+ Jeffrey E. Epstein
46
+
47
+ ### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
48
+
49
+ X
50
+
51
+ Plaintiff,
52
+
53
+ v. Index No. 1:19-cv-10476-PGG-DCF
54
+
55
+ DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN in their capacities as the executors of the ESTATE OF JEFFREY EDWARD • EPSTEIN,
56
+
57
+ •
58
+
59
+ Defendants.
60
+
61
+ X
62
+
63
+ # AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE
64
+
65
+ I, Mary "Molly" S. DiRago, declare as follow:
66
+
67
+ I. I am a member in good standing of the State Bar of Illinois and an associate with the law firm Troutman Sanders LLP, counsel for Defendants, Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn as Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (together, the "Co-Executors"). I submit this affidavit in support of my Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice before this Court.
68
+
69
+ 2. I have never been convicted of a felony.
70
+
71
+ 3. I have never been censured, suspended, disbarred, or denied admission or readmission by any court.
72
+
73
+ 4. There are no disciplinary proceedings presently against me.
74
+
75
+ I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct.
76
+
77
+ Dated: February 13, 2020 Respectfully Submitted,
78
+
79
+ Is/ Mary "Molly" S. DiRago
80
+
81
+ Mary "Molly" S. DiRago (Pro Hac Vice Pending)
82
+
83
+ Troutman Sanders LLP
84
+
85
+ One North Wacker Drive, Suite 2905
86
+
87
+ Chicago, 60606
88
+
89
+ (312) 759-1926
90
+
91
+ (312) 759-1939 (Fax)
92
+
93
+ molly.dirago@troutman.com
94
+
95
+ Attorneys for Defendants Darren K. Indyke and
96
+
97
+ Richard D. Kahn, Co-Executors of the Estate of
98
+
99
+ Jeffrey E. Epstein
100
+
101
+ # Certificate of Admission To the Bar of Illinois
102
+
103
+ I, Carolyn Taft Grosboll, Clerk of the Supreme Court of Illinois, do hereby certify that
104
+
105
+ Mary Sharon DiRago
106
+
107
+ has been duly licensed and admitted to practice as an Attorney and Counselor at Law within this State; has duly taken the required oath to support the CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES and of the STATE OF ILLINOIS, and also the oath of office prescribed by law, that said name was entered upon the Roll of Attorneys and Counselors in my office on 11/04/2004 and is in good standing, so far as the records of this office disclose.
108
+
109
+ > IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my name and affixed the seal of said Court, this 31st day of January, 2020.
110
+
111
+ > > Croy Gasicree
112
+
113
+ Clerk, Supreme Court of the State of Illinois
114
+
115
+ # CERTIFICATE OF GOOD STANDING
116
+
117
+ ![](_page_5_Picture_2.jpeg)
118
+
119
+ United States of America
120
+
121
+ }ss. Mary S DiRago
122
+
123
+ Northern District of Illinois
124
+
125
+ G. Bruton , Clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois,
126
+
127
+ DO HEREBY CERTIFY That Mary S DiRago was duly admitted to practice in said Court on (12/08/2004) and is in good standing as amember of the bar of said court.
128
+
129
+ Dated at Chicago, Illinois on (01/29/2020 )
130
+
131
+ G. Bruton , Clerk,
132
+
133
+ By: Tina Lag Deputy Clerk
134
+
135
+ ### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
136
+
137
+ X
138
+
139
+ Plaintiff,
140
+
141
+ v. ! Index No. 1:19-cv-10476-PGG-DCF
142
+
143
+ DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN in their capacities as the executors of the ESTATE OF JEFFREY EDWARD EPSTEIN,
144
+
145
+ Defendants.
146
+
147
+ X
148
+
149
+ # ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE
150
+
151
+ The motion of Mary "Molly" S. DiRago for admission to practice Pro Hac Vice in the above captioned action is granted.
152
+
153
+ Applicant has declared that she is a member in good standing of the bar(s) of the state(s) of Illinois; and that her contact information is as follows:
154
+
155
+ Mary "Molly" S. DiRago Troutman Sanders LLP One North Wacker Drive, Suite 2905 Chicago, 60606 (312) 759-1926 (312) 759-1939 (Fax) molly.dirago@troutman.com
156
+
157
+ Applicant having requested admission Pro Hac Vice to appear for all purposes as counsel for Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn as Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (together, the "Co-Executors"), in the above entitled action;
158
+
159
+ IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Applicant is admitted to practice Pro Hac Vice in the above captioned case in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. All attorneys appearing before this Court are subject to the Local Rules of this Court, including the Rules governing discipline of attorneys.
160
+
161
+ Dated:
162
+
163
+ United States District/Magistrate Judge
marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819151/EFTA02819151.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,507 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819151.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 8,
15
+ "chars": 5443,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 1.4,
17
+ "image_assets": [
18
+ "_page_5_Picture_2.jpeg"
19
+ ],
20
+ "marker_metadata": {
21
+ "table_of_contents": [
22
+ {
23
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK",
24
+ "heading_level": null,
25
+ "page_id": 0,
26
+ "polygon": [
27
+ [
28
+ 69.156,
29
+ 83.42999999999999
30
+ ],
31
+ [
32
+ 281.419189453125,
33
+ 83.42999999999999
34
+ ],
35
+ [
36
+ 281.419189453125,
37
+ 112.10302734375
38
+ ],
39
+ [
40
+ 69.156,
41
+ 112.10302734375
42
+ ]
43
+ ]
44
+ },
45
+ {
46
+ "title": "MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE",
47
+ "heading_level": null,
48
+ "page_id": 0,
49
+ "polygon": [
50
+ [
51
+ 182.988,
52
+ 322.38
53
+ ],
54
+ [
55
+ 430.1128845214844,
56
+ 322.38
57
+ ],
58
+ [
59
+ 430.1128845214844,
60
+ 337.10302734375
61
+ ],
62
+ [
63
+ 182.988,
64
+ 337.10302734375
65
+ ]
66
+ ]
67
+ },
68
+ {
69
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK",
70
+ "heading_level": null,
71
+ "page_id": 2,
72
+ "polygon": [
73
+ [
74
+ 69.156,
75
+ 83.42999999999999
76
+ ],
77
+ [
78
+ 281.419189453125,
79
+ 83.42999999999999
80
+ ],
81
+ [
82
+ 281.419189453125,
83
+ 112.10302734375
84
+ ],
85
+ [
86
+ 69.156,
87
+ 112.10302734375
88
+ ]
89
+ ]
90
+ },
91
+ {
92
+ "title": "AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE",
93
+ "heading_level": null,
94
+ "page_id": 2,
95
+ "polygon": [
96
+ [
97
+ 99.756,
98
+ 321.57000000000005
99
+ ],
100
+ [
101
+ 512.6129150390625,
102
+ 321.57000000000005
103
+ ],
104
+ [
105
+ 512.6129150390625,
106
+ 337.4830322265625
107
+ ],
108
+ [
109
+ 99.756,
110
+ 337.4830322265625
111
+ ]
112
+ ]
113
+ },
114
+ {
115
+ "title": "Certificate of Admission \nTo the Bar of Illinois",
116
+ "heading_level": null,
117
+ "page_id": 4,
118
+ "polygon": [
119
+ [
120
+ 195.84,
121
+ 112.59
122
+ ],
123
+ [
124
+ 460.2667236328125,
125
+ 112.59
126
+ ],
127
+ [
128
+ 460.2667236328125,
129
+ 166.19854736328125
130
+ ],
131
+ [
132
+ 195.84,
133
+ 166.19854736328125
134
+ ]
135
+ ]
136
+ },
137
+ {
138
+ "title": "CERTIFICATE OF GOOD STANDING",
139
+ "heading_level": null,
140
+ "page_id": 5,
141
+ "polygon": [
142
+ [
143
+ 149.94,
144
+ 53.46
145
+ ],
146
+ [
147
+ 467.3410339355469,
148
+ 53.46
149
+ ],
150
+ [
151
+ 467.3410339355469,
152
+ 74.53363037109375
153
+ ],
154
+ [
155
+ 149.94,
156
+ 74.53363037109375
157
+ ]
158
+ ]
159
+ },
160
+ {
161
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK",
162
+ "heading_level": null,
163
+ "page_id": 6,
164
+ "polygon": [
165
+ [
166
+ 68.544,
167
+ 83.42999999999999
168
+ ],
169
+ [
170
+ 281.419189453125,
171
+ 83.42999999999999
172
+ ],
173
+ [
174
+ 281.419189453125,
175
+ 112.10302734375
176
+ ],
177
+ [
178
+ 68.544,
179
+ 112.10302734375
180
+ ]
181
+ ]
182
+ },
183
+ {
184
+ "title": "ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE",
185
+ "heading_level": null,
186
+ "page_id": 6,
187
+ "polygon": [
188
+ [
189
+ 185.43599999999998,
190
+ 321.57000000000005
191
+ ],
192
+ [
193
+ 426.3628845214844,
194
+ 321.57000000000005
195
+ ],
196
+ [
197
+ 426.3628845214844,
198
+ 337.4830322265625
199
+ ],
200
+ [
201
+ 185.43599999999998,
202
+ 337.4830322265625
203
+ ]
204
+ ]
205
+ }
206
+ ],
207
+ "page_stats": [
208
+ {
209
+ "page_id": 0,
210
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
211
+ "block_counts": [
212
+ [
213
+ "Span",
214
+ 50
215
+ ],
216
+ [
217
+ "Line",
218
+ 24
219
+ ],
220
+ [
221
+ "Text",
222
+ 10
223
+ ],
224
+ [
225
+ "SectionHeader",
226
+ 2
227
+ ],
228
+ [
229
+ "PageHeader",
230
+ 1
231
+ ],
232
+ [
233
+ "PageFooter",
234
+ 1
235
+ ]
236
+ ],
237
+ "block_metadata": {
238
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
239
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
240
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
241
+ "previous_text": "",
242
+ "previous_type": "",
243
+ "previous_order": 0
244
+ }
245
+ },
246
+ {
247
+ "page_id": 1,
248
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
249
+ "block_counts": [
250
+ [
251
+ "Span",
252
+ 27
253
+ ],
254
+ [
255
+ "Line",
256
+ 14
257
+ ],
258
+ [
259
+ "Text",
260
+ 13
261
+ ],
262
+ [
263
+ "PageHeader",
264
+ 1
265
+ ],
266
+ [
267
+ "PageFooter",
268
+ 1
269
+ ]
270
+ ],
271
+ "block_metadata": {
272
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
273
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
274
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
275
+ "previous_text": "",
276
+ "previous_type": "",
277
+ "previous_order": 0
278
+ }
279
+ },
280
+ {
281
+ "page_id": 2,
282
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
283
+ "block_counts": [
284
+ [
285
+ "Span",
286
+ 54
287
+ ],
288
+ [
289
+ "Line",
290
+ 26
291
+ ],
292
+ [
293
+ "Text",
294
+ 14
295
+ ],
296
+ [
297
+ "SectionHeader",
298
+ 2
299
+ ],
300
+ [
301
+ "PageHeader",
302
+ 1
303
+ ],
304
+ [
305
+ "PageFooter",
306
+ 1
307
+ ]
308
+ ],
309
+ "block_metadata": {
310
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
311
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
312
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
313
+ "previous_text": "",
314
+ "previous_type": "",
315
+ "previous_order": 0
316
+ }
317
+ },
318
+ {
319
+ "page_id": 3,
320
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
321
+ "block_counts": [
322
+ [
323
+ "Span",
324
+ 27
325
+ ],
326
+ [
327
+ "Line",
328
+ 14
329
+ ],
330
+ [
331
+ "Text",
332
+ 13
333
+ ],
334
+ [
335
+ "PageHeader",
336
+ 1
337
+ ],
338
+ [
339
+ "PageFooter",
340
+ 1
341
+ ]
342
+ ],
343
+ "block_metadata": {
344
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
345
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
346
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
347
+ "previous_text": "",
348
+ "previous_type": "",
349
+ "previous_order": 0
350
+ }
351
+ },
352
+ {
353
+ "page_id": 4,
354
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
355
+ "block_counts": [
356
+ [
357
+ "Span",
358
+ 165
359
+ ],
360
+ [
361
+ "Line",
362
+ 19
363
+ ],
364
+ [
365
+ "Text",
366
+ 6
367
+ ],
368
+ [
369
+ "PageHeader",
370
+ 1
371
+ ],
372
+ [
373
+ "SectionHeader",
374
+ 1
375
+ ],
376
+ [
377
+ "PageFooter",
378
+ 1
379
+ ]
380
+ ],
381
+ "block_metadata": {
382
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
383
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
384
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
385
+ "previous_text": "",
386
+ "previous_type": "",
387
+ "previous_order": 0
388
+ }
389
+ },
390
+ {
391
+ "page_id": 5,
392
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
393
+ "block_counts": [
394
+ [
395
+ "Span",
396
+ 105
397
+ ],
398
+ [
399
+ "Line",
400
+ 16
401
+ ],
402
+ [
403
+ "Text",
404
+ 8
405
+ ],
406
+ [
407
+ "PageHeader",
408
+ 1
409
+ ],
410
+ [
411
+ "SectionHeader",
412
+ 1
413
+ ],
414
+ [
415
+ "Picture",
416
+ 1
417
+ ],
418
+ [
419
+ "PageFooter",
420
+ 1
421
+ ]
422
+ ],
423
+ "block_metadata": {
424
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
425
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
426
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
427
+ "previous_text": "",
428
+ "previous_type": "",
429
+ "previous_order": 0
430
+ }
431
+ },
432
+ {
433
+ "page_id": 6,
434
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
435
+ "block_counts": [
436
+ [
437
+ "Span",
438
+ 61
439
+ ],
440
+ [
441
+ "Line",
442
+ 30
443
+ ],
444
+ [
445
+ "Text",
446
+ 12
447
+ ],
448
+ [
449
+ "SectionHeader",
450
+ 2
451
+ ],
452
+ [
453
+ "PageHeader",
454
+ 1
455
+ ],
456
+ [
457
+ "PageFooter",
458
+ 1
459
+ ]
460
+ ],
461
+ "block_metadata": {
462
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
463
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
464
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
465
+ "previous_text": "",
466
+ "previous_type": "",
467
+ "previous_order": 0
468
+ }
469
+ },
470
+ {
471
+ "page_id": 7,
472
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
473
+ "block_counts": [
474
+ [
475
+ "Span",
476
+ 11
477
+ ],
478
+ [
479
+ "Line",
480
+ 6
481
+ ],
482
+ [
483
+ "Text",
484
+ 3
485
+ ],
486
+ [
487
+ "PageHeader",
488
+ 1
489
+ ],
490
+ [
491
+ "PageFooter",
492
+ 1
493
+ ]
494
+ ],
495
+ "block_metadata": {
496
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
497
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
498
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
499
+ "previous_text": "",
500
+ "previous_type": "",
501
+ "previous_order": 0
502
+ }
503
+ }
504
+ ],
505
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02819151"
506
+ }
507
+ }
marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819151/_page_5_Picture_2.jpeg ADDED

Git LFS Details

  • SHA256: 0db67042d717eda0098aef35cb73855ed612da08a336e39f098132ee8cb7983f
  • Pointer size: 130 Bytes
  • Size of remote file: 13.4 kB
marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819159/EFTA02819159.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
2
+
3
+ Plaintiff, v. DARREN K. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN in their capacities as the executors of the ESTATE OF JEFFREY EDWARD EPSTEIN, Defendants. X X
4
+
5
+ USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: 0 0
6
+
7
+ Index No. 1:19-cv-10476-PGG-DCF
8
+
9
+ ## ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE
10
+
11
+ The motion of Mary "Molly" S. DiRago for admission to practice Pro Hac Vice in the above captioned action is granted.
12
+
13
+ Applicant has declared that she is a member in good standing of the bar(s) of the state(s) of Illinois; and that her contact information is as follows:
14
+
15
+ Mary "Molly" S. DiRago Troutman Sanders LLP One North Wacker Drive, Suite 2905 Chicago, 60606 (312) 759-1926 (312) 759-1939 (Fax) molly.dirago@troutman.com
16
+
17
+ Applicant having requested admission Pro Hac Vice to appear for all purposes as counsel for Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn as Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (together, the "Co-Executors"), in the above entitled action;
18
+
19
+ IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Applicant is admitted to practice Pro Hac Vice in the above captioned case in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. All attorneys appearing before this Court are subject to the Local Rules of this Court, including the Rules governing discipline of attorneys.
20
+
21
+ Dated: //71.-d 2-0
22
+
23
+ United States District/Magistrate Judge
24
+
25
+ DEBRA FREEMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819159/EFTA02819159.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,120 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819159.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 2,
15
+ "chars": 1468,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 0.7,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 186.66,
27
+ 318.4381103515625
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 416.48223876953125,
31
+ 318.4381103515625
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 416.48223876953125,
35
+ 332.09999999999997
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 186.66,
39
+ 332.09999999999997
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ }
43
+ ],
44
+ "page_stats": [
45
+ {
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
48
+ "block_counts": [
49
+ [
50
+ "Span",
51
+ 73
52
+ ],
53
+ [
54
+ "Line",
55
+ 36
56
+ ],
57
+ [
58
+ "Text",
59
+ 9
60
+ ],
61
+ [
62
+ "PageHeader",
63
+ 1
64
+ ],
65
+ [
66
+ "SectionHeader",
67
+ 1
68
+ ],
69
+ [
70
+ "PageFooter",
71
+ 1
72
+ ]
73
+ ],
74
+ "block_metadata": {
75
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
76
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
77
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
78
+ "previous_text": "",
79
+ "previous_type": "",
80
+ "previous_order": 0
81
+ }
82
+ },
83
+ {
84
+ "page_id": 1,
85
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
86
+ "block_counts": [
87
+ [
88
+ "Span",
89
+ 61
90
+ ],
91
+ [
92
+ "Line",
93
+ 9
94
+ ],
95
+ [
96
+ "Text",
97
+ 4
98
+ ],
99
+ [
100
+ "PageHeader",
101
+ 1
102
+ ],
103
+ [
104
+ "PageFooter",
105
+ 1
106
+ ]
107
+ ],
108
+ "block_metadata": {
109
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
110
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
111
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
112
+ "previous_text": "",
113
+ "previous_type": "",
114
+ "previous_order": 0
115
+ }
116
+ }
117
+ ],
118
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02819159"
119
+ }
120
+ }
marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819161/EFTA02819161.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ Troutman Sanders LLP 875 Third Avenue New York, New York 10022
2
+
3
+ troutman.com
4
+
5
+ Bennet J. Moskowitz
6
+
7
+ bennelmoskowitz@troutman.com
8
+
9
+ February 20, 2020
10
+
11
+ ECF
12
+
13
+ Hon. Paul G. Gardephe Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007
14
+
15
+ ![](_page_0_Picture_3.jpeg)
16
+
17
+ Re: v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, in their capacities as the executors of The Estate of Jeffrey E Epstein, 1:19-cv-10476 (PGG) (DCF)
18
+
19
+ Dear Judge Gardephe:
20
+
21
+ We represent Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, in the referenced action. We write with Plaintiff's consent to respectfully request a one business day extension of the briefing schedule for Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint, as follows:
22
+
23
+ - 1. Defendant's motion is due on February 24, 2020 (currently February 21);
24
+ - 2. Plaintiff's opposition is due on March 9, 2020 (currently March 6); and
25
+ - 3. Defendant's reply, if any, is due on March 17 (currently March 16).
26
+
27
+ I requested this short extension because I was recently out of work for several days due to illness. This is the first request for an extension of these deadlines. The requested extension will not affect any other scheduled dates.
28
+
29
+ Respectfully submitted,
30
+
31
+ s/Bennet J. Moskowitz Bennet J. Moskowitz
marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819161/EFTA02819161.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819161.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 1,
15
+ "chars": 1284,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 0.84,
17
+ "image_assets": [
18
+ "_page_0_Picture_3.jpeg"
19
+ ],
20
+ "marker_metadata": {
21
+ "table_of_contents": [],
22
+ "page_stats": [
23
+ {
24
+ "page_id": 0,
25
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
26
+ "block_counts": [
27
+ [
28
+ "Span",
29
+ 65
30
+ ],
31
+ [
32
+ "Line",
33
+ 33
34
+ ],
35
+ [
36
+ "Text",
37
+ 13
38
+ ],
39
+ [
40
+ "ListItem",
41
+ 3
42
+ ],
43
+ [
44
+ "PageHeader",
45
+ 1
46
+ ],
47
+ [
48
+ "Picture",
49
+ 1
50
+ ],
51
+ [
52
+ "ListGroup",
53
+ 1
54
+ ],
55
+ [
56
+ "PageFooter",
57
+ 1
58
+ ]
59
+ ],
60
+ "block_metadata": {
61
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
62
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
63
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
64
+ "previous_text": "",
65
+ "previous_type": "",
66
+ "previous_order": 0
67
+ }
68
+ }
69
+ ],
70
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02819161"
71
+ }
72
+ }
marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819161/_page_0_Picture_3.jpeg ADDED

Git LFS Details

  • SHA256: d93af8ed1e320e197f0787686bf29adebbe19e0301cb96340f2005e8388f8bc8
  • Pointer size: 129 Bytes
  • Size of remote file: 7.51 kB
marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819162/EFTA02819162.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ Troutman Sanders LLP 875 Third Avenue New York, New York 10022
2
+
3
+ troutman.com
4
+
5
+ Bennet J. Moskowitz bennelmoskowitz@troutman.com
6
+
7
+ February 20, 2020
8
+
9
+ ECF
10
+
11
+ Hon. Paul G. Gardephe Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007
12
+
13
+ ![](_page_0_Picture_3.jpeg)
14
+
15
+ Re: v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, in their capacities as the executors of The Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, 1:19-cv-10476 (PGG) (DCF)
16
+
17
+ Dear Judge Gardephe:
18
+
19
+ We represent Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, in the referenced action. We write with Plaintiffs consent to respectfully request a one business day extension of the briefing schedule for Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint, as follows:
20
+
21
+ - 1. Defendant's motion is due on February 24, 2020 (currently February 21);
22
+ - 2. Plaintiff's opposition is due on March 9, 2020 (currently March 6); and
23
+ - 3. Defendant's reply, if any, is due on March 17 (currently March 16).
24
+
25
+ I requested this short extension because I was recently out of work for several days due to illness. This is the first request for an extension of these deadlines. The requested extension will not affect any other scheduled dates.
26
+
27
+ Respectfully submitted,
28
+
29
+ s/Bennet J. Moskowitz Bennet J. Moskowitz
30
+
31
+ MEMO ENDORSED
32
+
33
+ The Application is granted.
34
+
35
+ Paul G. Gardephe, U.
36
+
37
+ Dated:
marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819162/EFTA02819162.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819162.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 1,
15
+ "chars": 1358,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 0.98,
17
+ "image_assets": [
18
+ "_page_0_Picture_3.jpeg"
19
+ ],
20
+ "marker_metadata": {
21
+ "table_of_contents": [],
22
+ "page_stats": [
23
+ {
24
+ "page_id": 0,
25
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
26
+ "block_counts": [
27
+ [
28
+ "Span",
29
+ 74
30
+ ],
31
+ [
32
+ "Line",
33
+ 37
34
+ ],
35
+ [
36
+ "Text",
37
+ 17
38
+ ],
39
+ [
40
+ "ListItem",
41
+ 3
42
+ ],
43
+ [
44
+ "PageHeader",
45
+ 1
46
+ ],
47
+ [
48
+ "Picture",
49
+ 1
50
+ ],
51
+ [
52
+ "ListGroup",
53
+ 1
54
+ ],
55
+ [
56
+ "PageFooter",
57
+ 1
58
+ ]
59
+ ],
60
+ "block_metadata": {
61
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
62
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
63
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
64
+ "previous_text": "",
65
+ "previous_type": "",
66
+ "previous_order": 0
67
+ }
68
+ }
69
+ ],
70
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02819162"
71
+ }
72
+ }
marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819162/_page_0_Picture_3.jpeg ADDED

Git LFS Details

  • SHA256: de12a056d8d24b44676c8419dcb9750b47c003323122d3dd40f95af5b85fe1cb
  • Pointer size: 129 Bytes
  • Size of remote file: 7.15 kB
marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819163/EFTA02819163.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
2
+
3
+ vs.
4
+
5
+ Plaintiff,
6
+
7
+ DARREN I. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, in their capacities as the executors of the ESTATE OF JEFFREY EDWARD EPSTEIN,
8
+
9
+ Defendants.
10
+
11
+ Case No. 1:19-cv- 10476 (PGG)
12
+
13
+ ## NOTICE OF APPEARANCE
14
+
15
+ PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned attorney, Andrew Villacastin, who is a member in good standing of the bar of this Court, hereby appears as counsel for Plaintiff in the above-captioned proceeding.
16
+
17
+ Dated: New York, New York March 6, 2020
18
+
19
+ BOLES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP
20
+
21
+ By: 1st Andrew Villacastin Andrew Villacastin 55 Hudson Yards Telephone: (212) 446-2300 Fax: (212) 446-2350 avillacastin@bsfllp.com
22
+
23
+ Attorney for Plaintiff
marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819163/EFTA02819163.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819163.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 1,
15
+ "chars": 695,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 0.66,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 192.78000000000003,
27
+ 71.28
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 418.0601501464844,
31
+ 71.28
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 418.0601501464844,
35
+ 100.10302734375
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 192.78000000000003,
39
+ 100.10302734375
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "NOTICE OF APPEARANCE",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 359.856,
50
+ 217.07999999999998
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 519.3272094726562,
54
+ 217.07999999999998
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 519.3272094726562,
58
+ 231.7330322265625
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 359.856,
62
+ 231.7330322265625
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ }
66
+ ],
67
+ "page_stats": [
68
+ {
69
+ "page_id": 0,
70
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
71
+ "block_counts": [
72
+ [
73
+ "Span",
74
+ 49
75
+ ],
76
+ [
77
+ "Line",
78
+ 25
79
+ ],
80
+ [
81
+ "Text",
82
+ 11
83
+ ],
84
+ [
85
+ "SectionHeader",
86
+ 2
87
+ ],
88
+ [
89
+ "PageHeader",
90
+ 1
91
+ ],
92
+ [
93
+ "PageFooter",
94
+ 1
95
+ ]
96
+ ],
97
+ "block_metadata": {
98
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
99
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
100
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
101
+ "previous_text": "",
102
+ "previous_type": "",
103
+ "previous_order": 0
104
+ }
105
+ }
106
+ ],
107
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02819163"
108
+ }
109
+ }
marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819164/EFTA02819164.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
2
+
3
+ vs.
4
+
5
+ Plaintiff,
6
+
7
+ DARREN I. INDYKE and RICHARD D. KAHN, in their capacities as the executors of the ESTATE OF JEFFREY EDWARD EPSTEIN,
8
+
9
+ Defendants.
10
+
11
+ Case No. 1:19-cv- 10476 (PGG)
12
+
13
+ ## NOTICE OF APPEARANCE
14
+
15
+ PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the undersigned attorney, Sabina Mariella, who is a member in good standing of the bar of this Court, hereby appears as counsel for Plaintiff in the above-captioned proceeding.
16
+
17
+ Dated: New York, New York March 6, 2020
18
+
19
+ BOLES SCHILLER FLEXNER LLP
20
+
21
+ By: /s/ Sabina Mariella Sabina Mariella 55 Hudson Yards Telephone: (212) 446-2300 Fax: (212) 446-2350 smariella®bsflIp.com
22
+
23
+ Attorney for Plaintiff
marker2/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819164/EFTA02819164.metadata.json ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ {
2
+ "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-redacted-v-indyke-10476/EFTA02819164.pdf",
3
+ "engine": {
4
+ "marker_major": "2",
5
+ "marker_version": "2.0.0",
6
+ "mode": "balanced",
7
+ "use_llm": false,
8
+ "force_ocr": false,
9
+ "disable_ocr": false,
10
+ "output_format": "markdown",
11
+ "preserve_source": false
12
+ },
13
+ "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4",
14
+ "pages": 1,
15
+ "chars": 683,
16
+ "elapsed_seconds": 0.81,
17
+ "image_assets": [],
18
+ "marker_metadata": {
19
+ "table_of_contents": [
20
+ {
21
+ "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK",
22
+ "heading_level": null,
23
+ "page_id": 0,
24
+ "polygon": [
25
+ [
26
+ 192.78000000000003,
27
+ 71.28
28
+ ],
29
+ [
30
+ 418.4401550292969,
31
+ 71.28
32
+ ],
33
+ [
34
+ 418.4401550292969,
35
+ 100.10302734375
36
+ ],
37
+ [
38
+ 192.78000000000003,
39
+ 100.10302734375
40
+ ]
41
+ ]
42
+ },
43
+ {
44
+ "title": "NOTICE OF APPEARANCE",
45
+ "heading_level": null,
46
+ "page_id": 0,
47
+ "polygon": [
48
+ [
49
+ 359.856,
50
+ 217.07999999999998
51
+ ],
52
+ [
53
+ 519.3272094726562,
54
+ 217.07999999999998
55
+ ],
56
+ [
57
+ 519.3272094726562,
58
+ 231.7330322265625
59
+ ],
60
+ [
61
+ 359.856,
62
+ 231.7330322265625
63
+ ]
64
+ ]
65
+ }
66
+ ],
67
+ "page_stats": [
68
+ {
69
+ "page_id": 0,
70
+ "text_extraction_method": "pdftext",
71
+ "block_counts": [
72
+ [
73
+ "Span",
74
+ 49
75
+ ],
76
+ [
77
+ "Line",
78
+ 25
79
+ ],
80
+ [
81
+ "Text",
82
+ 11
83
+ ],
84
+ [
85
+ "SectionHeader",
86
+ 2
87
+ ],
88
+ [
89
+ "PageHeader",
90
+ 1
91
+ ],
92
+ [
93
+ "PageFooter",
94
+ 1
95
+ ]
96
+ ],
97
+ "block_metadata": {
98
+ "llm_request_count": 0,
99
+ "llm_error_count": 0,
100
+ "llm_tokens_used": 0,
101
+ "previous_text": "",
102
+ "previous_type": "",
103
+ "previous_order": 0
104
+ }
105
+ }
106
+ ],
107
+ "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02819164"
108
+ }
109
+ }