diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845736/EFTA02845736.md b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845736/EFTA02845736.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3eb7facaa97f768dc90c791f9ce92807a7362706 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845736/EFTA02845736.md @@ -0,0 +1,214 @@ +UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK + +UNITED STATES OF AMERICA + +TOVA NOEL and MICHAEL + +Defendants. + +x + +X + +ORIGINAL + +#### INDICTMENT + +§ORBI 830 + +### INTRODUCTION + +1. On or about August 10, 2019, TOVA NOEL and MICHAEL , the defendants, in dereliction of their duties as correctional officers at the Metropolitan Correctional Center ("MCC"), repeatedly failed to perform mandated counts of prisoners under their watch in the MCC's Special Housing Unit ("SHU"). Instead, for substantial portions of their shifts, NOEL and sat at their desk, browsed the internet, and moved around the common area of the SHU. To conceal their failure to perform their duties, NOEL and repeatedly signed false certifications attesting to having conducted multiple counts of inmates when, in truth and in fact, they never conducted such counts. As a result of those false statements, the MCC believed prisoners in the SHU were being regularly monitored and accounted for when, in fact, as a result of the defendants' conduct, no correctional officer conducted any count or round of the SHU from approximately 10:30 + +p.m. on August 9 until approximately 6:30 a.m. on August 10, at which time, as alleged herein, NOEL and ll'Illidiscovered the body of an MCC inmate, Jeffrey Epstein, who thad committed suicide overnight while unobserved. + +# RELEVANT INDIVIDUALS AND ENTITIES + +2. The MCC is a federal administrative detention facility located in Manhattan that is run by the Federal Bureau of Prisons ("BOP"). house inmates who Southern District The MCC is one of several facilities used to have been charged with federal crimes in the of New York and are awaiting trial. The MCC employs correctional officers, whose primary duty is to ensure the care, custody, and control of the inmate population of the MCC. + +3. TOVA NOEL, the defendant, has been employed as a correctional officer at the MCC since approximately 2016. As of August 2019, NOEL's primary assignment was the SHU. On August 9, 2019, NOEL worked a regular shift from 4 p.m. to 12 a.m. in the SHU, and then worked an overtime shift from 12 a.m. to 8 a.m. on August 10, 2019, also in the SHU. NOEL had also worked a regular shift in the SHU the day before, August 8, 2019, from 12 p.m. to 8 p.m. + +4. MICHAEL the defendant, has been employed as a correctional officer at the MCC since approximately 2007. Beginning in approximately 2013, was assigned to work as a + +materials handler supervisor, although EIM regularly worked overtime shifts as acorrectional officer, including in the SHU. MIM worked an overtime shift in the SHU on August 10, 2019, from 12 a.m. to 8 a.m. IMID did not work his regular shift on August 8 or August 9, 2019, but did work an overtime shift in the SHU on August 9, 2019 from 12 a.m. to 8 a.m. + +5. As detailed herein, Jeffrey Epstein was incarcerated at the MCC between his arrest on July 6, 2019, and his suicide on August 10, 2019. Epstein was detained pending trial in the Southern District of New York on sex trafficking charges. + +## THE MCC AND INSTITUTIONAL COUNTS + +6. The MCC, which houses approximately 750 inmates at any given time, assigns inmates to various housing units within the MCC. The SHU is a housing unit within the MCC where inmates are securely separated from the general inmate population to ensure their own safety as well as the safety of staff and other inmates. The SHU is located on the ninth floor of the MCC, and access to that floor is controlled by alocked door that can be opened remotely only by an officer in the MCC's centralized control center (the "Control Center"), which is located on the first floor of the MCC. Access into the SHU is also controlled by asecond locked door to which only correctional officers assigned to the SHU have keys while on duty. Within the SHU, inmates are assigned to six separate tiers, each of which can be accessed only via a single locked door to which the correctional officers assigned to the SHU have keys while on duty. Each tier has eight cells, each of which can house either one or two prisoners, and each individual cell which is made of cement and metal - is accessed only through a single locked door, to which only correctional officers assigned to the SHU have keys while on duty. + +7. The BOP requires correctional officers assigned to guard inmates at the MCC to conduct institution-wide counts of inmates at regular, scheduled intervals to ensure that each inmate is alive and accounted for within the MCC (the "institutional count"). On weekdays, the MCC conducts five institutional counts at 4 p.m., 10 p.m., 12 a.m., 3 a.m., and 5 a.m. Performing an institutional count is one of the most basic and essential aspects of acorrectional officer's job, and the count is one of the most basic and essential functions of daily operation of the MCC. Two officers are required to perform the institutional count for each housing unit, including the SHU, and are further required to document their performance of the count on an official MCC form called acount slip. To perform the institutional count in the SHU, two officers must walk from tier to tier to observe and count each individual inmate. + +8. On the count slip, both correctional officers are required to fill in the date and time the count was performed, write the total number of inmates physically present in the unit counted, and then sign the count slip. Once the correctional officers have completed and signed the count slips, the count slips are then collected and delivered to the Control Center, where officers within the Control Center are responsible for comparing the count slips from each housing unit to the institution's inmate roster to ensure that each inmate is accounted for. Only after all the count slips are collected from each housing unit, and the numbers on the slips are matched to the institution's inmate roster, can the institutional count be deemed "cleared" or completed. If a housing unit's count slip is incorrect or incomplete, then the institution cannot "clear" the count. Instead, the count must be completely redone in that housing unit via a more-intensive version of the institutional count called a "bed book count," in which officers must compare every individual inmate to the institution's inmate roster. Records of each institutional count, including the count slips, are provided to a supervising official and retained by the MCC. + +9. In addition to the institutional count, the BOP requires correctional officers assigned to the SHU to walk each of the tiers of the SHU - which is called a"round" - every thirty + +minutes ("30-minute rounds"). Like the institutional counts, correctional officers conduct 30-minute rounds to ensure that each inmate is alive and accounted for within his cell. Correctional officers working in the SHU are required to complete a form, which is reviewed and signed by their supervisor, documenting the date and time of each 30-minute round in each tier of the SHU. + +#### EPSTEIN'S PRIOR APPARENT SUICIDE ATTEMPT + +10. On July 6, 2019, inmate Jeffrey Epstein was arrested and detained at the MCC on sex trafficking charges. On July 10, 2019, Epstein was assigned to the SHU due to, among other things, risk factors for suicidality and safety concerns relating to housing him with the MCC's general population. + +11. On July 23, 2019, while Epstein was housed in the SHU, MCC officers responded to an emergency call, and found Epstein on the floor of his cell with a strip of bedsheet around his neck. MICHAEL 1=1, the defendant, was one of the MCC officers who responded to the incident. Epstein was subsequently transferred out of the SHU and was placed on suicide watch. Inmates placed on suicide watch are housed in acell on the hospital wing floor of the MCC, and are watched twenty-four hours a day by astaff member or aspecially trained inmate companion. + +12. Epstein remained on suicide watch for approximately twenty-four hours, and then was transferred to psychological observation, until July 30, 2019. Psychological observation is less restrictive than suicide watch, but inmates are still housed in the hospital wing of the MCC and watched twenty-four hours a day. + +13. On July 30, 2019, Epstein was transferred back to the SHU, and, at the direction of the MCC's psychological staff, was required to have an assigned cellmate. Epstein was also assigned to the cell closest to the correctional officers' desk in the common area of the SHU, which was approximately fifteen feet from the cell. Conducting the required institutional counts and thirty-minute rounds in the SHU were also part of the MCC's procedures for ensuring the safety of inmates, including Epstein. + +## EVENTS OF AUGUST 9-10, 2019 + +14. On August 9, 2019, Epstein's cellmate was transferred out of the MCC in a routine, pre-arranged transfer at approximately 8 a.m. Despite the MCC's psychological staff's direction that Epstein have a cellmate, no new cellmate was assigned to Epstein's cell. + +15. TOVA NOEL, the defendant, was one of the assigned officers on duty in the SHU from 4 p.m. on August 9, 2019 to 8 a.m. on August 10. From 4 p.m. to 12 a.m., two other officers were on duty with NOEL in the SHU: one officer was assigned to work from 2 p.m. to 10 p.m. ("Officer-1"), and one officer was assigned to work from 4 p.m. to 12 a.m. ("Officer-2"). MICHAEL athe defendant, started his shift in the SHU at 12 a.m. on August 10. From 12 a.m. until 8 a.m. on August 10, NOEL and were the only two officers on duty in the SHU. + +16. During the time period from 4 p.m. on August 9 to 8a.m. on August 10, the officers on duty in the SHU, including TOVA NOEL and MICHAEL a the defendants, were responsible for conducting five institutional counts: 4 p.m. and 10 p.m. on August 9; and 12 a.m., 3 a.m., and 5 a.m. on August 10. NOEL, IIIIIIlland the other officers on duty were also responsible for completing paperwork attesting to each of those counts. While, as detailed herein, count slips were completed for each institutional count, in fact, not a single one of those institutional counts was done. + +17. TOVA NOEL, the defendant, and Officer-1 were responsible for conducting the 4 p.m. institutional count in the SHU. As video from the MCC's internal video surveillance system makes clear, NOEL and Officer-1 did not perform the 4 p.m. count. Nonetheless, NOEL and Officer-1 completed and signed acount slip that falsely stated that the 4 p.m. institutional count had been performed. In reliance on that falsified count slip, at approximately 5:03 p.m., the Control Center cleared the 4 p.m. count. + +18. That evening, Epstein returned to the SHU from his attorney visit and was escorted into his cell by TOVA NOEL, the defendant, and another officer at approximately 7:49 p.m. NOEL and the other officer left the tier in which Epstein was housed immediately thereafter. + +19. By or before 10 p.m., all inmates in the MCC were locked in their cells for the night. At or around that time, TOVA NOEL, the defendant, and Officer-2 were responsible for conducting the 10 p.m. institutional count in the SHU. However, video from the MCC's internal video surveillance system shows that NOEL and Officer-2 did not perform the 10 p.m. count. Nonetheless, NOEL and Officer-2 completed and signed a count slip falsely stating that the 10 p.m. institutional count had been performed. In reliance on that falsified count slip, at approximately 10:36 p.m., the Control Center cleared the 10 p.m. count. + +20. As reflected on video obtained from the MCC's internal video surveillance system, at approximately 10:30 p.m. on August 9, 2019 - after TOVA NOEL, the defendant, had signed and submitted the 10 p.m. count slip and the institutional count had been completed - NOEL briefly walked up to, and then walked back from, the door to the tier in which Epstein was housed. As confirmed by the video obtained from the MCC's internal video surveillance system, this was the last time anyone, including any + +correctional officer, walked up to, let alone entered, the only entrance to the tier in which Epstein was housed until approximately 6:30 a.m. on August 10. + +21. Officer-l's shift ended at approximately 10 p.m., and at approximately 12 a.m., MICHAEL 'III'S, the defendant, replaced Officer-2, joining TOVA NOEL, the defendant, as the only two correctional officers on duty in the SRO. NOEL and were responsible for conducting the 12 a.m. institutional count in the SHU. As confirmed by video from the MCC's internal video surveillance system, NOEL and adid not perform the 12 a.m. count. Nonetheless, NOEL and completed and signed acount slip for the 12 a.m. count that falsely stated that the institutional count had been performed. In reliance on that falsified count slip, at approximately 12:49 a.m., the Control Center cleared the 12 a.m. count. + +22. TOVA NOEL and MICHAEL , the defendants, were additionally responsible for conducting the 3 a.m. and 5 a.m. institutional counts in the SHU. As confirmed by video from the MCC's internal video surveillance system, NOEL and did not perform either the 3 a.m. or the 5 a.m. counts. NOEL and nonetheless completed and signed count slips for both counts that falsely stated that they had performed the 3 a.m. and 5 a.m. institutional counts. In reliance on those falsified count slips, + +at approximately 3:24 a.m. and 5:30 a.m., the Control Center cleared the 3 a.m. and 5 a.m. counts, respectively. + +23. Moreover, despite the requirement that officers on duty in the SHU conduct and document regular, 30-minute rounds, TOVA NOEL and MICHAEL a the defendants, did not perform any of the required 30-minute rounds during their shift between approximately 12 a.m. and 6:30 a.m. Nonetheless, NOEL completed and signed more than 75 separate 30-minute round entries falsely affirming that they had, in fact, conducted such rounds. + +24. During the night, instead of completing the required counts and rounds, TOVA NOEL and MICHAEL a the defendants, were seated at the correctional officers' desk in the SHU common area (as noted above, approximately 15 feet from Epstein's cell), used the computers, and moved around the SHU common area. For a period of approximately two hours, NOEL and sat at their desk without moving, and appeared to have been asleep. NOEL used the computer periodically throughout the night, including to search the internet for furniture sales and benefit websites. used the computer briefly around 1 a.m., 4 a.m., and 6 a.m. to search for motorcycle sales and sports news. + +25. At approximately 4 a.m., the overnight supervisor briefly visited NOEL and in the SHU, and conferred with NOEL and IMMI, who were seated at and around the officers' desk, before leaving. At approximately 5:30 a.m., another correctional officer briefly walked through the SHU common area. Aside from those two officers, as confirmed by video surveillance, no one else entered the SHU, no one conducted any counts or rounds throughout the night, and no one entered the tier in which Epstein was housed. + +26. Shortly after 6 a.m. on August 10, 2019, MICHAEL UM and TOVA NOEL, the defendants, received a delivery of breakfast carts into the SHU, after which time they were again the only officers in the SHU. Shortly after 6:30 a.m., NOEL and MM walked up to and entered the tier in which Epstein was housed to serve breakfast. At approximately 6:33 a.m., an alarm was activated in the SHU. Epstein was alone in his cell and not responsive, with anoose around his neck. A supervisor who had just started his shift ("Supervisor-1") responded to the alarm almost immediately thereafter, and as NOEL approached the door to the SHU to open the door for Supervisor-1, NOEL told Supervisor-1 that "Epstein hung himself." After arriving in the SHU, Supervisor-1 spoke with and NOEL. NOEL told Supervisor-1 "we did not complete the 3 a.m. nor 5 a.m. rounds." stated, "we messed up," and "I messed up, she's not to blame, we didn't do any rounds." + +27. Epstein was transferred to alocal hospital where he was declared dead shortly thereafter. The Office of the Chief Medical Examiner of the City of New York conducted an autopsy and determined that Epstein had committed suicide by hanging himself. + +#### STATUTORY ALLEGATIONS + +### COUNT ONE (Conspiracy) + +The Grand Jury charges: + +28. The Grand Jury incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 27 of this Indictment as though fully set forth herein. + +29. In or about August 2019, in the Southern District of New York, TOVA NOEL and MICHAEL , the defendants, knowingly conspired with each other to: + +a. Knowingly defraud the United States by impairing, obstructing, and defeating the lawful functions of a department or agency of the United States, to wit, the MCC's function to ensure the care, custody, and control of its inmate population. + +b. Knowingly make and use a false writing or document knowing the same to contain a materially false, fictitious, and fraudulent statement and entry with the intent to impede, obstruct, or influence the investigation or proper administration of any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1001 (a)(3). + +30. In furtherance of the conspiracy and to effect the illegal objects thereof, TOVA NOEL and MICHAEL a, the defendants, committed the following overt acts, among others, in the Southern District of New York: + +a. On August 10, 2019, NOEL and falsely certified, on an MCC count slip, that they had performed the 12 a.m. institutional count of the SHU, when they had not in fact done so. + +b. On August 10, 2019, NOEL and falsely certified, on an MCC count slip, that they had performed the 3 a.m. institutional count of the SHU, when they had not in fact done so. + +c. On August 10, 2019, NOEL and falsely certified, on an MCC count slip, that they had performed the 5 a.m. institutional count of the SHU at MCC, when they had not in fact done so. + +d. On August 10, 2019, NOEL falsely certified that she and had performed aseries of 30-minute rounds of the SHU between 12 a.m. and 6:30 a.m., when they had not in fact done so. + +(Title 18, United States Code, Section 371) + +#### COUNT TWO (False Records - 4 p.m. Count) + +The Grand Jury further charges: + +31. The Grand Jury incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 27 of this Indictment as though fully set forth herein. + +32. On or about August 9, 2019, in the Southern District of New York, TOVA NOEL, the defendant, willfully and knowingly did make and use a false writing or document knowing the same to contain a materially false, fictitious, and fraudulent statement and entry with the intent to impede, obstruct, or influence the investigation or proper administration of any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States, and did attempt to do the same, to wit, NOEL created, signed, and submitted to the MCC a materially false count slip indicating that she had performed the 4 p.m. institutional count of the SHU, when she had not in fact done so. + +(Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1001(a)(3) and 2) + +### COUNT THREE (False Records - 10 p.m. Count) + +The Grand Jury further charges: + +33. The Grand Jury incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 27 of this Indictment as though fully set forth herein. + +34. On or about August 9, 2019, in the Southern District of New York, TOVA NOEL, the defendant, willfully and knowingly did make and use a false writing or document knowing the same to contain a materially false, fictitious, and fraudulent statement and entry with the intent to impede, obstruct, or influence the investigation or proper administration of any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States, and did attempt to do the same, to wit, NOEL created, signed, and submitted to the MCC a materially false count slip indicating that she had performed the 10 p.m. institutional count of the SHU, when she had not in fact done so. + +(Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1001(a)(3) and 2) + +COUNT FOUR (False RecOrds - 12 a.m. Count) + +The Grand Jury further charges: + +35. The Grand Jury incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 27 of this Indictment as though fully set forth herein. + +36. On or about August 10, 2019, in the Southern District of New York, TOVA NOEL and MICHAEL Mr the defendants, willfully and knowingly did make and use a false writing or document knowing the same to contain a materially false, fictitious, and fraudulent statement and entry with the intent to impede, obstruct, or influence the investigation or proper administration of any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States, and did attempt to do the same, to wit, NOEL and MB created, signed, and submitted to the MCC a materially false count slip indicating that they had performed the 12 a.m. institutional count of the SHU, when they had not in fact done so. + +(Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1001(a)(3) and 2) + +## COUNT FIVE (False Records - 3 a.m. Count) + +The Grand Jury further charges: + +37. The Grand Jury incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 27 of this Indictment as though fully set forth herein. + +38. On or about August 10, 2019, in the Southern District of New York, TOVA NOEL and MICHAEL , the defendants, willfully and knowingly did make and use a false writing or document knowing the same to contain a materially false, fictitious, and fraudulent statement and entry with the intent to impede, obstruct, or influence the investigation or proper administration of any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States, and did attempt to do the same, to wit, NOEL and created, signed, and submitted to the MCC a materially false count slip indicating that they had performed the 3 a.m. institutional count of the SHU, when they had not in fact done so. + +(Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1001(a)(3) and 2) + +COUNT SIX (False Records - 5 a.m. Count) + +The Grand Jury further charges: + +39. The Grand Jury incorporates the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 27 of this Indictment as though fully set forth herein. + +40. On or about August 10, 2019, in the Southern District of New York, TOVA NOEL and MICHAEL , the defendants, willfully and knowingly did make and use a false writing or document knowing the same to contain a materially false, fictitious, and fraudulent statement and entry with the intent to impede, obstruct, or influence the investigation or proper administration of any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States, and did attempt to do the same, to wit, NOEL and created, signed, and submitted to the MCC a materially false count slip indicating that they had + +performed the 5 a.m. institutional count of the SHU, when they had not in fact done so. + +(Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1001(a)(3) and 2) + +![]()![]()GEOFFREY S. BERMAN +United States Attorney + +--- + +UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT +SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK + +--- + +UNITED STATES OF AMERICA + +- v. - + +TOVA NOEL and +MICHAEL [REDACTED] + +Defendants. + +--- + +INDICTMENT + +19 Cr. + +Title 18, United States Code, +Sections 371, 1001(a)(3), and 2. + +GEOFFREY S. BERMAN +United States Attorney + +--- + +A TRUE BILL + +![]()Foreperson. + +--- + +2 Arrest warrants +Indictment Filed +Assigned to Judge Turres +Hon. Sarah Netburn, USMJ +(R) 11/19/19 \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845736/EFTA02845736.metadata.json b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845736/EFTA02845736.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9ca092e3e2c4736779a1e8d2bb5c2a3b830d0304 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845736/EFTA02845736.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,1040 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845736.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 20, + "chars": 23623, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.03, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "INDICTMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 378.216, + 112.59 + ], + [ + 460.77105712890625, + 112.59 + ], + [ + 460.77105712890625, + 124.5931396484375 + ], + [ + 378.216, + 124.5931396484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INTRODUCTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 258.264, + 276.21000000000004 + ], + [ + 353.48468017578125, + 276.21000000000004 + ], + [ + 353.48468017578125, + 289.5931091308594 + ], + [ + 258.264, + 289.5931091308594 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RELEVANT INDIVIDUALS AND ENTITIES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 182.37599999999998, + 181.44 + ], + [ + 433.1270446777344, + 181.44 + ], + [ + 433.1270446777344, + 196.33209228515625 + ], + [ + 182.37599999999998, + 196.33209228515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "THE MCC AND INSTITUTIONAL COUNTS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 186.66, + 371.79 + ], + [ + 425.71270751953125, + 371.79 + ], + [ + 425.71270751953125, + 385.55999999999995 + ], + [ + 186.66, + 385.55999999999995 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EPSTEIN'S PRIOR APPARENT SUICIDE ATTEMPT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 157.28400000000002, + 236.51999999999998 + ], + [ + 454.0098876953125, + 236.51999999999998 + ], + [ + 454.0098876953125, + 249.48 + ], + [ + 157.28400000000002, + 249.48 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EVENTS OF AUGUST 9-10, 2019", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 211.75199999999995, + 398.52 + ], + [ + 416.3608703613281, + 398.52 + ], + [ + 416.3608703613281, + 412.29 + ], + [ + 211.75199999999995, + 412.29 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "STATUTORY ALLEGATIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 225.216, + 181.44 + ], + [ + 385.47491455078125, + 181.44 + ], + [ + 385.47491455078125, + 193.59 + ], + [ + 225.216, + 193.59 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT ONE \n(Conspiracy)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 260.1, + 208.17000000000002 + ], + [ + 353.4332275390625, + 208.17000000000002 + ], + [ + 353.4332275390625, + 234.89999999999998 + ], + [ + 260.1, + 234.89999999999998 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT TWO \n(False Records - 4 p.m. Count)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 195.1119384765625, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 415.72314453125, + 72.9 + ], + [ + 415.72314453125, + 98.82 + ], + [ + 195.1119384765625, + 98.82 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT THREE \n(False Records - 10 p.m. Count)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 192.78000000000003, + 562.9499999999999 + ], + [ + 422.88946533203125, + 562.9499999999999 + ], + [ + 422.88946533203125, + 589.8862152099609 + ], + [ + 192.78000000000003, + 589.8862152099609 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "COUNT FIVE \n(False Records - 3 a.m. Count)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 195.84, + 262.44 + ], + [ + 418.22210693359375, + 262.44 + ], + [ + 418.22210693359375, + 290.22125244140625 + ], + [ + 195.84, + 290.22125244140625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 198.89999999999998, + 100.44 + ], + [ + 412.48800000000006, + 100.44 + ], + [ + 412.48800000000006, + 126.35999999999999 + ], + [ + 198.89999999999998, + 126.35999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INDICTMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 268.05600000000004, + 291.6 + ], + [ + 343.33200000000005, + 291.6 + ], + [ + 343.33200000000005, + 305.37 + ], + [ + 268.05600000000004, + 305.37 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 280 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 281 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 271 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 274 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 264 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 272 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 264 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 262 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 221 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 238 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 234 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 257 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 245 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 197 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 17 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "Line", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 44 + ], + [ + "Text", + 22 + ], + [ + "Line", + 18 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02845736" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845756/EFTA02845756.md b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845756/EFTA02845756.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1e30c90fb824ad41cdcbe1778e86d2a3fdf86195 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845756/EFTA02845756.md @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ +UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, + +-against- + +TOVA NOEL and MICHAEL + +Defendants. + +ANALISA District Judge: + +USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: 11/19/2019 + +19 Cr. 830 (AT) + +ORDER + +It is hereby ORDERED that an initial conference is scheduled for November 25, 2019, at 12:00 p.m. in Courtroom 15D of the United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York. + +SO ORDERED. + +Dated: November 19, 2019 New York, New York + +Cyr. + +ANALISA United States District Judge \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845756/EFTA02845756.metadata.json b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845756/EFTA02845756.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c7b589d1c418e08a1bf5032e325a6d59cc56e080 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845756/EFTA02845756.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,58 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845756.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 540, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.67, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 48 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02845756" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845757/EFTA02845757.md b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845757/EFTA02845757.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..074f01f4a2120244abb87d42227fc185f0bdd39c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845757/EFTA02845757.md @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ +## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT + +Southern DISTRICT OF + +To the Clerk of this court and all parties of record: + +Enter my appearance as counsel in this case for + +Tova Noel + +I certify that I am admitted to practice in this court. + +11/19/2019 + +Date Signature + +New York + +## APPEARANCE + +Case Number: 19 Crim 830 + +Jason E. Foy + +Prim Name + +.47 + +105 Main Street + +Address + +Hackensack NJ + +City State + +07601 + +JF5839 + +Bar Number + +Zip Code + +(201) 457-0071 (201) 457-0072 + +Phone Number Fax Number \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845757/EFTA02845757.metadata.json b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845757/EFTA02845757.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d65cb0eca7f18e52549898ca223adedba08aeae3 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845757/EFTA02845757.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,109 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845757.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 480, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.43, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 176.868, + 71.2874755859375 + ], + [ + 439.9639892578125, + 71.2874755859375 + ], + [ + 439.9639892578125, + 92.78875732421875 + ], + [ + 176.868, + 92.78875732421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "APPEARANCE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 407.592, + 154.71 + ], + [ + 499.9168701171875, + 154.71 + ], + [ + 499.9168701171875, + 168.84405517578125 + ], + [ + 407.592, + 168.84405517578125 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 28 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02845757" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845758/EFTA02845758.md b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845758/EFTA02845758.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6383bd668445f98e1b8e28ad94e6122ae25f13ca --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845758/EFTA02845758.md @@ -0,0 +1,96 @@ +AUSA Nicolas Roos + +DEF.'S COUNSEL James E. Foy + + RETAINED FEDERAL DEFENDERS CJA PRESENTMENT ONLY + + INTERPRETER NEEDED + + DEFENDANT WAIVES PRETRIAL REPORT + + Rule 5 Rule 9 Rule 5(c)(3) Detention Hrg. + +DATE OF ARREST 11/19/2019 + + VOL. SURR. + +TIME OF ARREST \_\_\_\_\_ + + ON WRIT + + Other: \_\_\_\_\_ + +TIME OF PRESENTMENT \_\_\_\_\_ + +BAIL DISPOSITION + + DETENTION ON CONSENT W/O PREJUDICE + + DETENTION: RISK OF FLIGHT/DANGER + + SEE SEP. ORDER + + DETENTION HEARING SCHEDULED FOR: + + AGREED CONDITIONS OF RELEASE + + DEF. RELEASED ON OWN RECOGNIZANCE + + \$100,000 PRB 2 FRP + + SECURED BY \$ CASH/PROPERTY: + + TRAVEL RESTRICTED TO SDNY/EDNY/District of New Jersey, Eastern District of Pennsylvania + + TEMPORARY ADDITIONAL TRAVEL UPON CONSENT OF AUSA & APPROVAL OF PRETRIAL SERVICES + + SURRENDER TRAVEL DOCUMENTS (& NO NEW APPLICATIONS) + + PRETRIAL SUPERVISION: REGULAR STRICT AS DIRECTED BY PRETRIAL SERVICES + + DRUG TESTING/TREATMT AS DIRECTED BY PTS MENTAL HEALTH EVAL/TREATMT AS DIRECTED BY PTS + + DEF. TO SUBMIT TO URINALYSIS; IF POSITIVE, ADD CONDITION OF DRUG TESTING/TREATMENT + + HOME INCARCERATION HOME DETENTION CURFEW ELECTRONIC MONITORING GPS + + DEF. TO PAY ALL OF PART OF COST OF LOCATION MONITORING, AS DETERMINED BY PRETRIAL SERVICES + + DEF. TO CONTINUE OR SEEK EMPLOYMENT [OR] DEF. TO CONTINUE OR START EDUCATION PROGRAM + + DEF. NOT TO POSSESS FIREARM/DESTRUCTIVE DEVICE/OTHER WEAPON + + DEF. TO BE DETAINED UNTIL ALL CONDITIONS ARE MET + + DEF. TO BE RELEASED ON OWN SIGNATURE, PLUS THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: + +; REMAINING CONDITIONS TO BE MET BY: 11/25/19 + +ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS/ADDITIONAL PROCEEDINGS/COMMENTS: + +*No contact with co-defendant unless in the presence of counsel.* + + DEF. ARRAIGNED; PLEADS NOT GUILTY + + CONFERENCE BEFORE D.J. ON 11/25/2019 + + DEF. WAIVES INDICTMENT + + SPEEDY TRIAL TIME EXCLUDED UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7) UNTIL 11/25/2019 + +For Rule 5(c)(3) Cases: + + IDENTITY HEARING WAIVED + + DEFENDANT TO BE REMOVED + + PRELIMINARY HEARING IN SDNY WAIVED + + CONTROL DATE FOR REMOVAL: \_\_\_\_\_ + +PRELIMINARY HEARING DATE: 12/19/2019 + + ON DEFENDANT'S CONSENT + +[Signature] +UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, S.D.N.Y. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845758/EFTA02845758.metadata.json b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845758/EFTA02845758.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fc54cf18d96c70a3159a72ce61079de3755410e6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845758/EFTA02845758.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,132 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845758.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 2124, + "elapsed_seconds": 13.27, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "BAIL DISPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.81599999999997, + 192.77999999999997 + ], + [ + 348.22799999999995, + 192.77999999999997 + ], + [ + 348.22799999999995, + 204.93 + ], + [ + 255.81599999999997, + 204.93 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS/ADDITIONAL PROCEEDINGS/COMMENTS:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 42.228, + 472.23 + ], + [ + 372.70799999999997, + 472.23 + ], + [ + 372.70799999999997, + 483.57 + ], + [ + 42.228, + 483.57 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "For Rule 5(c)(3) Cases:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 42.228, + 634.23 + ], + [ + 145.04399999999998, + 634.23 + ], + [ + 145.04399999999998, + 646.38 + ], + [ + 42.228, + 646.38 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 147 + ], + [ + "Text", + 102 + ], + [ + "Line", + 48 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02845758" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845759/EFTA02845759.md b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845759/EFTA02845759.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..62fd20455283335ca9e9b47affe36c174aefe596 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845759/EFTA02845759.md @@ -0,0 +1,77 @@ +DOCKET No. 19 Cr 830 (AT) DEFENDANT Michael M. + +AUSA Nicolas Roos DEF.'S COUNSEL Montel Fiovi + +0 RETAINED O FEDERAL DEFENDERS U CIA O PRESENTMENT ONLY + +INTERPRETER NEEDED + +O DEFENDANT WAIVES PRETRIAL REPORT + +O Rule 5 O Rule 9 O Rule 5(c)(3) O Detention Hrg. DATE OF ARREST 11/19/2019 0 VOL SURR. + +TIME OF ARREST O ON WRIT + +O Other: TIME OF PRESENTMENT + +## BAIL DISPOSITION + +❑ SEE SEP. ORDER O DETENTION ON CONSENT W/O PREJUDICE O DETENTION: RISK OF FLIGHT/DANGER O SEE TRANSCRIPT + +O DETENTION HEARING SCHEDULED FOR: + +O AGREED CONDITIONS OF RELEASE + +o DEF. RELEASED ON OWN RECOGNIZANCE + +\$100.000 PRB 0 2 FRP + +O SECURED BY \$ CASH/PROPERTY: + +0 TRAVEL RESTRICTED TO SDNY/EDNY/District of New Jersey + +O TEMPORARY ADDITIONAL TRAVEL UPON CONSENT OF AUSA & APPROVAL OF PRETRIAL SERVICES + +0 SURRENDER TRAVEL DOCUMENTS (& NO NBW APPLICATIONS) + +0 PRETRIAL SUPERVISION: O REGULAR O STRICT 0 AS DIRECTED BY PRETRIAL SERVICES + +O DRUG TESTINOTREATMT AS DIRECTED BY PTS O MENTAL HEALTH EVAUTREATMT AS DIRECTED BY PTS + +O DEF. TO SUBMIT TO URINALYSIS; IF POSITIVE, ADD CONDITION OF DRUG TESTING/TREATMENT + +O HOME INCARCERATION O HOME DETENTION O CURFEW O ELECTRONIC MONITORING CI an + +O DEF. TO PAY ALL OF PART OF COST OF LOCATION MONITORING, AS DETERMINED BY PRETRIAL SERVICES + +O DEF. TO CONTINUE OR SEEK EMPLOYMENT [OR] O DEF. TO CONTINUE OR START EDUCATION PROGRAM + +0 DEF. NOT TO POSSESS FIREARM/DESTRUCTIVE DEVICE/OTHER WEAPON + +g f36. TO BE DETAINED UNTIL ALL CONDITIONS ARE MET + +DEF. TO BE RELEASED ON OWN SIGNATURE, PLUS THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: + +; REMAINING CONDITIONS TO BE MET BY: I L 9. V ( + +## ADDMONAL CONDMONS/ADDMONAL PROCEEDINGS/COMMENTS: + +IJD tAlibtSc JG Litre qv ate.ok4t. + +'JO I, 6 %Ante V V14/.Ata te kik ./4+1"u q covifititt. + +0 DEF. ARRAIGNED; PLEADS NOT GUILTY 0 CONFERENCE BEFORE D.J. ON 11125[2,019 + +O DEF. WAIVES INDICTMENT + +0 SPEEDY TRIAL TIME EXCLUDED UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 3161(hX7) UNTIL 11/25/2019 + +For Rule 5(O(3) Cases: + +❑ IDENTITY HEARING WAIVED O DEFENDANT TO BE REMOVED + +❑ PRELIMINARY HEARING IN SDNY WAIVED O CONTROL DATE FOR REMOVAL: + +PRELIMINARY HEARING DATE: 190t90381015r O ON DEFENDANT'S CONSENT + +UNITED TES MAGISIVA YE JUDGE, S.D.N.Y. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845759/EFTA02845759.metadata.json b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845759/EFTA02845759.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9c9ff534dde707e69b6f06932c2bd9d9e1d89864 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845759/EFTA02845759.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,109 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845759.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 2156, + "elapsed_seconds": 2.18, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "BAIL DISPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 256.428, + 194.39999999999998 + ], + [ + 351.57623291015625, + 194.39999999999998 + ], + [ + 351.57623291015625, + 206.59759521484375 + ], + [ + 256.428, + 206.59759521484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ADDMONAL CONDMONS/ADDMONAL PROCEEDINGS/COMMENTS:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 41.61600000000001, + 473.84999999999997 + ], + [ + 375.43548583984375, + 473.84999999999997 + ], + [ + 375.43548583984375, + 486.5850830078125 + ], + [ + 41.61600000000001, + 486.5850830078125 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 143 + ], + [ + "Text", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02845759" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845760/EFTA02845760.md b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845760/EFTA02845760.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9aa5b44d69c586fc6e683eefaf5fbee74193508d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845760/EFTA02845760.md @@ -0,0 +1,400 @@ +# UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT + +Southern District of New York + +for the + +United States of America ) + +v. ) + +) + +MICHAEL ) + +Defendant ) + +APPEARANCE BOND + +### Defendant's Agreement + +19 CR 830 (AT) + +• + +Michael (defendant), agree to follow every order of this court, or any court that considers this case, and I further agree that this bond may be forfeited if I fail: + +( 0 ) to appear for court proceedings; ( ) if convicted, to surrender to serve a sentence that the court may impose; or ( ) to comply with all conditions set forth in the Order Setting Conditions of Release + +![](_page_0_Picture_26.jpeg) + +( ) (1) This is a personal recognizance bond. + +( ISI ) (2) This is an unsecured bond of \$ \$100,000.00 • + +( O ) (3) This is a secured bond of \$ , secured by: + +( O ) (a) \$ , in cash deposited with the court. + +( 0 ) (b) the agreement of the defendant and each surety to forfeit the following cash or other property (describe the cash or other property, Including claims on it —such as a lien, mortgage, or loan — and attach proof of ownership and value): + +If this bond is secured by real property, documents to protect the secured interest may be filed of record. + +( O ) (c) a bail bond with a solvent surety (attach a copy of the ball bond, or describe it and Ida\* the surety): + +## Forfeiture or Release of the Bond + +Forfeiture of the Bond. This appearance bond may be forfeited if the defendant does not comply with the above agreement. The court may immediately order the amount of the bond surrendered to the United States, including the security for the bond, if the defendant does not comply with the agreement. At the request of the United States, the court may order a judgment of forfeiture against the defendant and each surety for the entire amount of the bond, including interest and costs. + +AO 98 (key. 12/I I )Appearance flood + +Release of the Bond. The court may order this appearance bond ended at any time. This bond will be satisfied and the security will be released when either: (1) the defendant is found not guilty on all charges, or (2) the defendant reports to serve a sentence. + +# Declarations + +Ownership of the Property. I, the defendant — and each surety — declare under penalty of perjury that: + +- (1) all owners of the property securing this appearance bond are included on the bond; +- (2) the property is not subject to claims, except as described above; and +- (3) I will not sell the property, allow further claims to be made against it, or do anything to reduce its value while this appearance bond is in effect. + +Acceptance. I, the defendant — and each surety — have read this appearance bond and have either read all the conditions of release set by the court or had them explained to me. I agree to this Appearance Bond. + +I, the defendant - and each surety — declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true. (See 28 U.S.C.§ 1746.) + +Date: 11/19/2019 + +7:.9 417 . 5 + +Suretylproperty owner printed name A + +Defendant's signature Michael= + +Surety/property owner — signature and date + +Surety/property owner— printed name Suretylproperry owner— signature and date + +Surety/property owner — printed name Surety/property owner —signature and date + +Date: 11/19/2019 + +Approved. + +Date: 11/19/2019 + +AO 9\$ (Rev. 12/11) Appearance Bond + +Release oldie Bond. The court may order this appearance bond ended at any time. This bond will be satisfied and the security will be released when either: (I) the defendant is found not guilty on all charges, or (2) the defendant reports to serve a sentence. + +#### Declarations + +Ownership of the Property. I, the defendant — and each surety — declare under penalty of perjury that: + +- (1) all owners of the property securing this appearance bond are included on the bond; +- (2) the property is not subject to claims, except as described above; and +- (3) I will not sell the property, allow further claims to be made against it, or do anything to reduce its value while this appearance bond is in effect. + +Acceptance. 1, the defendant —and each surety —Stave read this appearance hoed and have tithes read at4 the conditions of release set by the court or had them explained to me. I agree to this Appearance Bond. + +I, the defendant — and each surety — declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true. (See 28 U.S.C.§ 1746.) + +Date: 11/19/2019 + +(47e4its. + +Surety/property owner — printed name Surety/property owner — signature and date + +Defrndant a signature Michael + +Surely/property owner —printed name Surety/property owner — signature and dote + +Suretyiproperry owner — prtniedneum + +Date: 11/19/2019 + +Approved. + +Date: 11/19/2019 + +Surety/property owner — signature and dote + +A i284te At Wilk te/ • Oil/ + +AO 98 (Rev. 12/11) Appearance Bond + +Release of the Bond. The court may order this appearance bond ended at any time. This bond will be satisfied and the security will be released when either: (1) the defendant is found not guilty on all charges, or (2) the defendant reports to serve a sentence. + +Declarations + +Ownership of the Property. I, the defendant - and each surety - declare under penalty of perjury that: + +- (1) all owners of the property securing this appearance bond are included on the bond; +- (2) the property is not subject to claims, except as described above; and +- (3) I will not sell the property, allow further claims to be made against it, or do anything to reduce its value while this appearance bond is in effect. + +Acceptance. I, the defendant - and each surety - have read this appearance bond and have either read all the conditions of release set by the court or had them explained to me. I agree to this Appearance Bond. + +I, the defendant - and each surety - declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true. (See 28 U.S.C.§ 1746.) + +Date: 11/19/2019 + +![]()Defendant's signature **Michael** [Redacted] + +![]()Surety/property owner - printed name + +2 + +Surety/property owner - signature and date + +![]()Surety/property owner - printed name + +![]()NEWARK, NJ + +Surety/property owner - printed name + +Surety/property owner - signature and date + +CLERK OF COURT + +![]()Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk + +![]()AUSA signature **Nicolas Roos** + +![]()USDC - NJ Depty Clerk + +Date: 11/19/2019 + +Approved. + +Date: 11/19/2019 + +# UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT + +for the + +Southern District of New York + +United States of America v. + +) ) ) Case No. 19 CR 830 (AT) + +Michael ) + +Defendant ) + +# ORDER SEWING CONDITIONS OF RELEASE + +IT IS ORDERED that the defendant's release is subject to these conditions: + +- (1) The defendant must not violate federal, state, or local law while on release. +- (2) The defendant must cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample if it is authorized by 42 U.S.C. § 14135a. +- (3) The defendant must advise the court or the pretrial services office or supervising officer in writing before making any change of residence or telephone number. +- (4) The defendant must appear in court as required and, if convicted, must surrender as directed to serve a sentence that the court may impose. + +The defendant must appear at: Place + +on Date and Time + +If blank, defendant will be notified of next appearance. + +- (5) The defendant must sign an Appearance Bond, if ordered. + +#### ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS OF RELEASE + +IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant's release is subject to the conditions marked below: + +( ❑ ) (6) The defendant is placed in the custody of: + +Person or organization + +Address (only (talian? Is an organisation) + +City and state Tel. No. who agrees to (a) supervise the defendant, (b) use every effort to assure the defendant's appearance at all court proceedings, and (c) notil), the court inunediatcl if the defendant violates a condition of release or is no longer in the custodian's custody. + +Signed: + +Custodian + +( (7) The defendant must: + +) (a) submit to supervision by and report for supervision to the PRETRIAL SERVICES telephone number , no later than (O ) (b) continue or actively seek employment. (O ) (c) continue or start an education program. ) (d) surrender any passport to: PRETRIAL SERVICES ( 0 ) (e) not obtain a passport or other international travel document. ) (f) abide by the following restrictions on personal association, residence, or travel: SDNY / EDNY I DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY + +( ❑ ) (g) avoid all contact, directly or indirectly, with any person who is or may be a victim or witness in the investigation or prosecution, including: + +( ❑ ) (h) get medical or psychiatric treatment: + +( ❑ ) (I) return to custody each at o'clock after being released at o'clock for employment, schooling, or the following purposes: + +( ❑ ) 0) maintain residence at a halfway house or community corrections center, as the pretrial services office or supervising officer considers necessary. + +( is] ) (k) not possess afirearm, destructive device, or other weapon. + +( Z ) (I) not use alcohol ( ❑ ) at all ( (g) ) excessively. + +( ❑ ) (m) not use or unlawfully possess a narcotic drug or other controlled substances defined in 21 U.S.C. § 802, unless prescribed by alicense medical practitioner. + +( ❑ ) (n) submit to testing for a prohibited substance if required by the pretrial services office or supervising officer. Testing may be used with randoi frequency and may include urine testing, the wearing of a sweat patch, aremote alcohol testing system, and/or any form of prohibite substance screening or testing. The defendant must not obstruct, attempt to obstruct, or tamper with the efficiency and accuracy of prohibite substance screening or testing. + +( Q ) (o) participate in a program of inpatient or outpatient substance abuse therapy and counseling if directed by the pretrial services office t supervising officer. + +( ❑ ) (p) participate in one of the following location restriction programs and comply with its requirements as directed. + +( ❑ ) (i) Curfew. You are restricted to your residence every day ( ) from to , or ( ❑ ) as directed by the pretrial services office or supervising officer; or + +( ❑ ) (ii) Home Detention. You are restricted to your residence at all times except for employment; education; religious services; medico substance abuse, or mental health treatment attorney visits; cowl appearances; cowl-ordered obligations; or other activitk approved in advance by the pretrial services office or supervising officer; or + +( ❑ ) (iii) Home Incarceration. You are restricted to 24-hour-a-day lock-down at your residence except for medical necessities and court appearances or other activities specifically approved by the court. + +( ❑ ) (q) submit to location monitoring as directed by the pretrial services office or supervising officer and comply with all of the program requirements and instructions provided. + +(O ) You must pay all or pan of the cost of the program based on your ability to pay as determined by the pretrial services office or supervising officer. + +( ❑ ) (r) report as soon as possible, to the pretrial services office or supervising officer, every contact with law enforcement personnel, including arrests, questioning, or traffic stops. + +# ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS OF RELEASE + +(C81) (4 \$100,000 Personal Recognizance Bond; To be co-signed by 2 financially responsible persons; Travel restricted to Southern and Eastern District of New York, and District of New Jersey; Surrender travel documents and no new applications; Pretrial supervision as directed by Pretrial Services; Defendant no to possess firearm, destructive device, and other weapon; Defendant to be released on own signature; Remaining conditions to be met by 11/26/2019; No excessive use of alcohol; No contact with co-defendant unless in the presence of counsel. + +# ADVICE OF PENALTIES AND SANCTIONS + +TO THE DEFENDANT: Michael + +YOU ARE ADVISED OF THE FOLLOWING PENALTIES AND SANCTIONS: + +19 CR 830 (AT) + +Violating any of the foregoing conditions of release may result in the immediate issuance of a warrant for your arrest, a revocation of your release, an order of detention, a forfeiture of any bond, and a prosecution for contempt of court and could result in imprisonment, a fine, or both. + +While on release, if you commit a federal felony offense the punishment is an additional prison term of not more than ten years + +and for a federal misdemeanor offense the punishment is an additional prison term of not more than one year. This sentence will be consecutive (Le., in addition to) to any other sentence you receive. + +It is a crime punishable by up to ten years in prison, and a \$250,000 fine, or both, to: obstruct a criminal investigation; tamper with a witness, victim, or informant; retaliate or attempt to retaliate against a witness, victim, or informant; or intimidate or attempt to intimidate a witness, victim, juror, informant, or officer of the court. The penalties for tampering, retaliation, or intimidation are significantly more serious if they involve a killing or attempted killing. + +If, after release, you knowingly fail to appear as the conditions of release require, or to surrender to serve a sentence, you may be prosecuted for failing to appear or surrender and additional punishment may be imposed. If you are convicted of: + +- (I) an offense punishable by death, life imprisonment, or imprisonment for a term of fifteen years or more you will be fined not more than \$250,000 or imprisoned for not more than 10 years, or both; +- (2) an offense punishable by imprisonment for a tenn of five years or more, but less than fifteen years you will be fined not more than \$250,000 or imprisoned for not more than five years, or both; +- (3) any other felony you will be fined not more than \$250,000 or imprisoned not more than two years, or both; +- (4) a misdemeanor you will be fined not more than \$I00,000 or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. + +A term of imprisonment imposed for failure to appear or surrender will be consecutive to any other sentence you receive. In addition, a failure to appear or surrender may result in the forfeiture of any bond posted. + +# Acknowledgment of the Defendant + +I acknowledge that I am the defendant in this case and that I am aware of the conditions of release. I promise to obey all conditions of release, to appear as directed, and surrender to serve any sentence imposed. I am aware of the penalties and sanctions set forth above. + +ti + +- + +Dilenclant's Smokers + +City and Stale + +# Directions to the United States Marshal + +( ❑ ) The defendant is ORDERED released after processing. ( ❑ ) The United States marshal is ORDERED to keep the defendant in custody until notified by the clerk or judge that the defendant has posted bond and/or complied with all other conditions for release. If still in custody, the defendant must be produced before the appropriate judge at the time and place specified. + +Date: 11/19/2019 + +Judicial Officef's Stumm + +DISTRIBUTION: COURT DEFENDANT PRETRIAL SERVICE U.S. ATTORNEY U.S. MARSHAL + +![](_page_8_Figure_107.jpeg) + +AUSA Nicolas Roos + +DEF.'S COUNSEL Montel Fiegrins + + RETAINED FEDERAL DEFENDERS CJA PRESENTMENT ONLY + + INTERPRETER NEEDED + + DEFENDANT WAIVES PRETRIAL REPORT + + Rule 5 Rule 9 Rule 5(c)(3) Detention Hrg. + +DATE OF ARREST 11/19/2019 + + VOL. SURR. + +TIME OF ARREST \_\_\_\_\_ + + ON WRIT + + Other: \_\_\_\_\_ + +TIME OF PRESENTMENT \_\_\_\_\_ + +BAIL DISPOSITION + + DETENTION ON CONSENT W/O PREJUDICE + + DETENTION: RISK OF FLIGHT/DANGER + + SEE SEP. ORDER + + DETENTION HEARING SCHEDULED FOR: + + AGREED CONDITIONS OF RELEASE + + DEF. RELEASED ON OWN RECOGNIZANCE + + \$100,000 PRB 2 FRP + + SECURED BY \$ \_\_\_\_\_ CASH/PROPERTY: + + TRAVEL RESTRICTED TO SDNY/EDNY/District of New Jersey + + TEMPORARY ADDITIONAL TRAVEL UPON CONSENT OF AUSA & APPROVAL OF PRETRIAL SERVICES + + SURRENDER TRAVEL DOCUMENTS (& NO NEW APPLICATIONS) + + PRETRIAL SUPERVISION: REGULAR STRICT AS DIRECTED BY PRETRIAL SERVICES + + DRUG TESTING/TREATMT AS DIRECTED BY PTS MENTAL HEALTH EVAL/TREATMT AS DIRECTED BY PTS + + DEF. TO SUBMIT TO URINALYSIS; IF POSITIVE, ADD CONDITION OF DRUG TESTING/TREATMENT + + HOME INCARCERATION HOME DETENTION CURFEW ELECTRONIC MONITORING GPS + + DEF. TO PAY ALL OF PART OF COST OF LOCATION MONITORING, AS DETERMINED BY PRETRIAL SERVICES + + DEF. TO CONTINUE OR SEEK EMPLOYMENT [OR] DEF. TO CONTINUE OR START EDUCATION PROGRAM + + DEF. NOT TO POSSESS FIREARM/DESTRUCTIVE DEVICE/OTHER WEAPON + + DEF. TO BE DETAINED UNTIL ALL CONDITIONS ARE MET + + DEF. TO BE RELEASED ON OWN SIGNATURE, PLUS THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: + +; REMAINING CONDITIONS TO BE MET BY: 11/26/19 + +ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS/ADDITIONAL PROCEEDINGS/COMMENTS: + +*No unlessive use of alcohol. +No contact with co-dependent unless in the presence of counsel.* + + DEF. ARRAIGNED; PLEADS NOT GUILTY + + CONFERENCE BEFORE D.J. ON 11/25/2019 + + DEF. WAIVES INDICTMENT + + SPEEDY TRIAL TIME EXCLUDED UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7) UNTIL 11/25/2019 + +For Rule 5(c)(3) Cases: + + IDENTITY HEARING WAIVED + + DEFENDANT TO BE REMOVED + + PRELIMINARY HEARING IN SDNY WAIVED + + CONTROL DATE FOR REMOVAL: \_\_\_\_\_ + +PRELIMINARY HEARING DATE: 11/19/2019 + + ON DEFENDANT'S CONSENT \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845760/EFTA02845760.metadata.json b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845760/EFTA02845760.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5c659ba84194af7fc115a66d6e0beefe0a864fd7 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845760/EFTA02845760.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,855 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845760.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 10, + "chars": 16982, + "elapsed_seconds": 14.79, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_0_Picture_26.jpeg", + "_page_8_Figure_107.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 172.58399999999997, + 68.50439453125 + ], + [ + 446.6016540527344, + 68.50439453125 + ], + [ + 446.6016540527344, + 91.177734375 + ], + [ + 172.58399999999997, + 91.177734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Defendant's Agreement", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 251.53199999999998, + 242.18999999999997 + ], + [ + 369.2010498046875, + 242.18999999999997 + ], + [ + 369.2010498046875, + 255.60113525390625 + ], + [ + 251.53199999999998, + 255.60113525390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 274.176, + 348.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 341.49600000000004, + 348.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 341.49600000000004, + 359.64 + ], + [ + 274.176, + 359.64 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Forfeiture or Release of the Bond", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 230.724, + 630.1800000000001 + ], + [ + 391.8421325683594, + 630.1800000000001 + ], + [ + 391.8421325683594, + 644.1035461425781 + ], + [ + 230.724, + 644.1035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Declarations", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 277.236, + 142.56 + ], + [ + 345.8166198730469, + 142.56 + ], + [ + 345.8166198730469, + 156.9735107421875 + ], + [ + 277.236, + 156.9735107421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Declarations", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 283.968, + 147.16168212890625 + ], + [ + 347.7353210449219, + 147.16168212890625 + ], + [ + 347.7353210449219, + 159.9505615234375 + ], + [ + 283.968, + 159.9505615234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Declarations", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 283.968, + 144.17999999999998 + ], + [ + 344.556, + 144.17999999999998 + ], + [ + 344.556, + 154.71 + ], + [ + 283.968, + 154.71 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 169.524, + 77.76 + ], + [ + 447.2315368652344, + 77.76 + ], + [ + 447.2315368652344, + 100.7882080078125 + ], + [ + 169.524, + 100.7882080078125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER SEWING CONDITIONS OF RELEASE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 175.03199999999998, + 231.66 + ], + [ + 442.895263671875, + 231.66 + ], + [ + 442.895263671875, + 248.070556640625 + ], + [ + 175.03199999999998, + 248.070556640625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS OF RELEASE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 203.18400000000003, + 63.99000000000001 + ], + [ + 424.1330871582031, + 63.99000000000001 + ], + [ + 424.1330871582031, + 76.14 + ], + [ + 203.18400000000003, + 76.14 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS OF RELEASE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 203.18400000000003, + 62.37 + ], + [ + 429.8702697753906, + 62.37 + ], + [ + 429.8702697753906, + 78.603515625 + ], + [ + 203.18400000000003, + 78.603515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ADVICE OF PENALTIES AND SANCTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 186.66, + 50.22 + ], + [ + 414.259033203125, + 50.22 + ], + [ + 414.259033203125, + 64.83758544921875 + ], + [ + 186.66, + 64.83758544921875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Acknowledgment of the Defendant", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 216.64799999999997, + 377.46000000000004 + ], + [ + 386.1458740234375, + 377.46000000000004 + ], + [ + 386.1458740234375, + 392.20758056640625 + ], + [ + 216.64799999999997, + 392.20758056640625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Directions to the United States Marshal", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 206.24400000000003, + 566.1899999999999 + ], + [ + 398.8812561035156, + 566.1899999999999 + ], + [ + 398.8812561035156, + 582.3376007080078 + ], + [ + 206.24400000000003, + 582.3376007080078 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "BAIL DISPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.81599999999997, + 193.59 + ], + [ + 346.39199999999994, + 193.59 + ], + [ + 346.39199999999994, + 204.93 + ], + [ + 255.81599999999997, + 204.93 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS/ADDITIONAL PROCEEDINGS/COMMENTS:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 44.676, + 473.03999999999996 + ], + [ + 372.70799999999997, + 473.03999999999996 + ], + [ + 372.70799999999997, + 485.18999999999994 + ], + [ + 44.676, + 485.18999999999994 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "For Rule 5(c)(3) Cases:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 9, + "polygon": [ + [ + 44.676, + 636.66 + ], + [ + 147.49200000000002, + 636.66 + ], + [ + 147.49200000000002, + 648.8100000000001 + ], + [ + 44.676, + 648.8100000000001 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 90 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 22 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 78 + ], + [ + "Text", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 721 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 28 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 26 + ], + [ + "Line", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 93 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 9 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Figure", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 136 + ], + [ + "Text", + 100 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02845760" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845760/_page_0_Picture_26.jpeg b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845760/_page_0_Picture_26.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f6b4d3b0e2c0bb46f7265c9209c053492117ae13 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845760/_page_0_Picture_26.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:eaef1257516a0b3708b42dceb72d11082838239a40e99d83839a33c2e383d9ac +size 20742 diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845760/_page_8_Figure_107.jpeg b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845760/_page_8_Figure_107.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..99ddf896342f3a84cc6d00ca87b8106a6a5bdf8e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845760/_page_8_Figure_107.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:44328f836a89b5295f063374c9d48db202b4d5337ecc2f01f0928b1d1e2549c0 +size 108152 diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845770/EFTA02845770.md b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845770/EFTA02845770.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c01bf05fa09ca8d94f30dad6f782622b42f04241 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845770/EFTA02845770.md @@ -0,0 +1,311 @@ +# UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT + +for the + +Southern District of New York + +United States of America + +V. + +TOVA NOEL + +Defendant + +19 CR 830 + +# APPEARANCE BOND + +ORIGLNAI + +# Defendant's Agreement + +TOVA NOEL (defimdant), agree to follow every order of this court, or any court that considers this case, and I further agree that this bond may be forfeited if I fail: + +( 0 ) to appear for court proceedings; ) if convicted, to surrender to serve a sentence that the court may impose; or ( ) to comply with all conditions set forth in the Order Setting Conditions of Release. + +# Type of Bond + +( ) (I) This is a personal recognizance bond. + +( X ) (2) This is an unsecured bond of \$ 100,000 PRB + +( ❑ ) (3) This is a secured bond of \$ , secured by: + +( ❑ ) \$ , in cash deposited with the court. + +( ❑ ) (b) the agreement of the defendant and each surety to forfeit the following cash or other property (describe the cash or other property, including claims on It —such as a lien, mortgage, or loan — and attach proof of ownership and value): + +If this bond is secured by real property, documents to protect the secured interest may be filed of record. + +( ❑ ) (c) a bail bond with a solvent surety (attach a copy of the bail bond, or describe it and den\* the sure0): + +# Forfeiture or Release of the Bond + +Forfeiture of the Bond. This appearance bond may be forfeited if the defendant does not comply with the above agreement. The court may immediately order the amount of the bond surrendered to the United States, including the security for the bond, if the defendant does not comply with the agreement. At the request of the United States, the court may order a judgment of forfeiture against the defendant and each surety for the entire amount of the bond, including interest and costs. + +AO 98 (Rev. 12/I I ) Appearance Bond + +Release of the Bond. The court may order this appearance bond ended at any time. This bond will be satisfied and the security will be released when either: (1) the defendant is found not guilty on all charges, or (2) the defendant reports to serve a sentence. + +# Declarations + +Ownership of the Property. I, the defendant — and each surety — declare under penalty of perjury that: + +- (1) all owners of the property securing this appearance bond are included on the bond; +- (2) the property is not subject to claims, except as described above; and +- (3) I will not sell the property, allow further claims to be made against it, or do anything to reduce its value while this appearance bond is in effect. + +Acceptance. I, the defendant — and each surety — have read this appearance bond and have either read all the conditions of release set by the court or had them explained to me. I agree to this Appearance Bond. + +I, the defendant - and each surety — declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true. (See 28 U.S.C.§ 1746.) + +Date: 11/19/2019 + +.2) TOVA NOEL + +SYLVIA EPHRAIM .4, ..544 \Kx.),N-:\ + +Surety/Property owner — Suretylproperly owner signature and dale + +Surety/property owner— Surety/property owner —signature and date + +Date: 11/19/2019 + +Surety/property owner — Surety/property owner — signature and date + +Approved. + +Date: 11/19/2019 + +CLERK OF COURT Signature of 41erk or Deputy Clerk - + +1W1ACCO' MAN ROOS + +# UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT + +for the + +Southern District of New York + +United States of America v. + +TOVA NOEL + +Defendant + +19 CR 830 (AT) + +# ORDER SETTING CONDITIONS OF RELEASE + +IT IS ORDERED that the defendant's release is subject to these conditions: + +The defendant must not violate federal, state, or local law while on release. The defendant must cooperate in the collection of a DNA sample if it is authorized by 42 U.S.C. § 14135a. The defendant must advise the court or the pretrial services office or supervising officer in writing before making any change of residence or telephone number. The defendant must appear in court as required and, if convicted, must surrender as directed to serve a sentence that the court may impose. + +The defendant must appear at: Place + +on Date and Time + +If blank, defendant wilt be notified of next appearance. + +- (5) The defendant must sign an Appearance Bond, if ordered. + +# ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS OF RELEASE + +rr IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant's release is subject to the conditions marked below: + +( ❑ ) (6) The defendant is placed in the custody of: + +Person or organization + +Address (only (/above is on organisation) + +City and state TeL No. + +who agrees to (a) supervise the defendant, (b) use every effort to assure the defendant's appearance at all court proceedings, and (c) notify the court immediately if the defendant violates a condition of release or is no longer in the custodian's custody. + +Signed: + +Custodian + +(CD) (7) The defendant must: + +( X ) (a) submit to supervision by and report for supervision to the PRETRIAL SUPERVISION AS DIRECTED BY PTS + +telephone number , no later than + +( ) (b) continue or actively seek employment. + +(O ) (c) continue or start an education program. + +( ) (d) surrender any passport to: PSA (& NO NEW APPLICATIONS) + +( X ) (e) not obtain a passport or other international travel document + +( X ) (f) abide by the following restrictions on personal association, residence, or travel: SDNY/EDNY; DNJ & EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA + +(O ) (g) avoid all contact, directly or indirectly, with any person who is or may be a victim or witness in the investigation or prosecution, including: + +( X ) (1) get medical or psychiatric treatment: MENTAL HEALTH EVALUATION/TREATMENT + +- (O) (i) retum to custody each or the following purposes: at o'clock after being released at o'clock for employment, schooling, + +( ❑ ) 0) maintain residence at a halfway house or community corrections center, as the pretrial services office or supervising officer considers DCOSSItly. + +( X ) (k) not possess a firearm, destructive device, or other weapon. + +(O ) 0) not use alcohol ( ❑ ) at all ( ❑ ) excessively. + +(O ) (m) not use or unlawfully possess a narcotic drug or other controlled substances defined in 21 U.S.C. \$ 802, unless prescribed by a licensed medical practitioner. + +( ) (n) submit to testing for a prohibited substance if required by the pretrial services office or supervising officer. Testing may be used with random frequency and may include urine testing, the wearing of a sweat patch, a remote alcohol testing system, and/or any form of prohibited substance screening or testing. The defendant must not obstruct, attempt to obstruct, or tamper with the efficiency and accuracy of prohibited substance screening or testing. + +( ) (o) participate in a program of inpatient or outpatient substance abuse therapy and counseling if directed by the pretrial services office or supervising officer. + +( ) (p) participate in one of the following location restriction programs and corn ly with its requirements as directed. + +( ❑ ) (i) Curfew. You are restricted to your residence every day ( ) from to , or ( ❑ ) as directed by the pretrial services office or supervising officer, or + +( ❑ ) (ii) Home Detention. You are restricted to your residence at all times except for employment; education; religious services; medical, substance abuse, or mental health treatment; attorney visits; court appearances; court•ordered obligations; or other activities approved in advance by the pretrial services office or supervising officer, or + +(O ) (iii) Home Incarceration. You are restricted to 24-hour-a-day lock-down at your residence except for medical necessities and court appearances or other activities specifically approved by the court. + +( ❑ ) (q) submit to location monitoring as directed by the pretrial services office or supervising officer and comply with all of the program requirements and instructions provided. + +(O ) You must pay all or part of the cost of the program based on your ability to pay as determined by the pretrial services office or supervising officer. + +report as soon as possible, to the pretrial services office or supervising officer, every contact with law enforcement personnel, including arrests, questioning, or traffic stops. (El ) + +# ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS OF RELEASE + +PRB TO BE CO-SIGNED BY 2 FINANCIALLY RESPONSIBLE PERSONS; TRAVEL LIMITED TO SDNY/EDNY; DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY & EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA; SURRENDER TRAVEL DOCUMENTS (& NO NEW APPLICATIONS); PRETRIAL SUPERVISION AS DIRECTED BY PTS; MENTAL HEALTH EVALUATION/TREATMENT AS DIRECTED BY PTS; DEFT NOT TO POSSESS FIREARM/DESTRUCTIVE DEVICE/OTHER WEAPON; DEFT TO BE RELEASED ON OWN SIGNATURE; REMAINING CONDITIONS TO BE MET BY 11126/2019; NO CONTACT WITH CO-DEFENDANT UNLESS IN THE PRESENCE OFCOUNSEL + +# ADVICE OF PENALTIES AND SANCTIONS + +TO THE DEFENDANT: TOVA NOEL 19 CR 830 (AT) + +YOU ARE ADVISED OF THE FOLLOWING PENALTIES AND SANCTIONS: + +11/19/2019 + +Violating any of the foregoing conditions of release may result in the immediate issuance of a warrant for your arrest, a revocation of your release, an order of detention, aforfeiture of any bond, and a prosecution for contempt of cote and could result in imprisonment, afine, or both. + +While on release, if you commit a federal felony offense the punishment is an additional prison term of not more than ten years + +and for a federal misdemeanor offense the punishment is an additional prison term of not more than one year. This sentence will be consecutive (I.e., in addition to) to any other sentence you receive. + +It is a crime punishable by up to ten years in prison, and a \$250,000 fine, or both, to: obstruct a criminal investigation; tamper with a witness, victim, or informant; retaliate or attempt to retaliate against a witness, victim, or informant; or intimidate or attempt to intimidate a witness, victim, juror, informant, or officer of the court. The penalties for tampering, retaliation, or intimidation are significantly more serious if they involve a killing or attempted killing. + +If, after release, you knowingly fail to appear as the conditions of release require, or to surrender to serve asentence, you may be prosecuted for failing to appear or surrender and additional punishment may be imposed. If you are convicted of: + +- (1) an offense punishable by death, life imprisonment, or imprisonment for a term of fifteen years or more you will be fined not more than \$250,000 or imprisoned for not more than 10 years, or both; +- (2) an offense punishable by imprisonment for a term of five years or more, but less than fifteen years you will be fined not more than \$250,000 or imprisoned for not more than five years, or both; +- (3) any other felony you will be fined not more than \$250,000 or imprisoned not more than two years, or both; +- (4) amisdemeanor you will be fined not more than \$100,000 or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. + +Aterm of imprisonment imposed for failure to appear or surrender will be consecutive to any other sentence you receive. In addition, afailure to appear or surrender may result in the forfeiture of any bond posted. + +### Acknowledgment of the Defendant + +Iacknowledge that I am the defendant in this case and that I am aware of the conditions of release. I promise to obey all conditions of release, to appear as directed, and surrender to serve any sentence imposed. I am aware of the penalties and sanctions set forth above. + +nah n edirrr....1. PeProntal itilivg'41k6i&irdia itat tiatiu + +TOVA NOEL- + +Cly and Stale + +### Directions to the United States Marshal + +( 0 ) The defendant is ORDERED released after processing. ( 0) The United States marshal is ORDERED to keep the defendant in custody until notified by the clerk or judge that the defendant has posted bond and/or complied with all other conditions for release. If still in custody, the defendant must be produced before the appropriate judge at the time and place specified. + +Date: + +Judicial Officer's Signature + +Printed name and fide + +DISTRIBUTION: COURT DEFENDANT PRETRIAL SERVICE U.S. ATTORNEY U.S. MARSHAL + +![](_page_6_Figure_15.jpeg) + +*DAG* +*EDJN* + +DOCKET No. 19 Cr 830 (AT) DEFENDANT Tova Noel + +AUSA Nicolas Roos DEF.'S COUNSEL James E. Fov + +0 RETAINED O FEDERAL DEFENDERS O CIA O PRESENTMENT ONLY + +O INTERPRETER NEEDED + +O DEFENDANT WAIVES PRETRIAL REPORT + +ORule 5 O Rule 9 O Rule 5(eX3) O Detention Hrg. DATE OF ARREST 11/19/2019 0 VOL SURR. + +TIME OF ARREST ❑ ON WRIT + +OOther: TIME OF PRESENTMENT + +#### !TAIL DISPOSITION + +O SEE SEP. ORDER + +❑ DETENTION ON CONSENT W/O PREJUDICE O DETENTION: RISK OF FLIGHT/DANGER O SEE TRANSCRIPT + +O DETENTION HEARING SCHEDULED FOR: + +O AGREED CONDITIONS OF RELEASE + +O DEF. RELEASED ON OWN RECOGNIZANCE + +03100.000 PRB 02 FRP + +O SECURED BY S CASH/PROPERTY: + +IZI TRAVEL RESTRICTED TO SDNY/EDNY/District of New Jersev. EasternDlagrict of Pennsylvania + +❑ TEMPORARY ADDITIONAL TRAVEL UPON CONSENT OF AUSA & APPROVAL OF PRETRIAL SERVICES + +0SURRENDER TRAVEL DOCUMENTS (& NO NEW APPLICATIONS) + +0PRETRIAL SUPERVISION: O REGULAR O STRICT 0 AS DIRECTED BY PRETRIAL SERVICES + +ODRUG TESTING/TREATMT AS DIRECTED BY PTS 0 MENTAL HEALTH EVALtTREATMT AS DIRECTED BY PTS + +❑ DEF. TO SUBMIT TO URINALYSIS; IP POSITIVE, ADD CONDITION OF DRUG TESTING/TREATMENT + +❑ HOME INCARCERATION O HOME DETENTION O CURFEW O ELECTRONIC MONITORING O GPS + +ODEF. TO PAY ALL OF PART OF COST OF LOCATION MONITORING, AS DETERMINED BY PRETRIAL SERVICES + +ODEF. TO CONTINUE OR SEEK EMPLOYMENT [OR] O DEF. TO CONTINUE OR START EDUCATION PROGRAM + +0DEF. NOT TO POSSESS FIREAMDESTRUCTIVE DEVICEIOT'HER WEAPON lar--.To BB DETAINED UNTIL ALL CONDITIONS ARE MET + +FF. TO BE RELEASED ON OWN SIGNATURE, PLUS THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: + +• REMAINING CONDITIONS TO BE MET BY: t t Lelel l1 + +# ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS/ADDITIONAL PROCEEDINGS/COMMENTS: + +loo Lot/IA-tu•t- kAM44 dt vt,s netAk- vAA/Lar ivl O. 644A-Ste fAitt, ilhAtscv-ce- + +0DEF. ARRAIGNED; PLEADS NOT GUILTY 0 CONFERENCE BEFORE DJ. ON 11/252019 + +CI DEF. WAIVES INDICTMENT + +0SPEEDY TRIAL TIME EXCLUDED UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 3161(hX7) UNTIL J1/25/2019 + +for Rule 5(c)(3) Casts: + +O 'Damn HEARING WAIVED + +OpRELIN0NARY HEARING IN SDNY WAIVED + +O DEFENDANT TO BE REMOVED + +O CONTROL DATE FOR REMOVAL: + +PRELIMINARY HEARING DATE: O ON DEFENDANT'S CONSENT \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845770/EFTA02845770.metadata.json b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845770/EFTA02845770.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..df1dbffcb62f545dc09876b8227934295be94ce9 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845770/EFTA02845770.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,716 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845770.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 8, + "chars": 14322, + "elapsed_seconds": 4.58, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_6_Figure_15.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 171.36, + 69.6243896484375 + ], + [ + 443.9737854003906, + 69.6243896484375 + ], + [ + 443.9737854003906, + 92.3077392578125 + ], + [ + 171.36, + 92.3077392578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "APPEARANCE BOND", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 250.92000000000002, + 218.6881103515625 + ], + [ + 366.237548828125, + 218.6881103515625 + ], + [ + 366.237548828125, + 231.603515625 + ], + [ + 250.92000000000002, + 231.603515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Defendant's Agreement", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 249.696, + 244.61999999999998 + ], + [ + 367.05926513671875, + 244.61999999999998 + ], + [ + 367.05926513671875, + 257.853515625 + ], + [ + 249.696, + 257.853515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Type of Bond", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 272.34000000000003, + 346.68 + ], + [ + 340.4721984863281, + 346.68 + ], + [ + 340.4721984863281, + 359.8535461425781 + ], + [ + 272.34000000000003, + 359.8535461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Forfeiture or Release of the Bond", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 227.052, + 627.75 + ], + [ + 389.2513427734375, + 627.75 + ], + [ + 389.2513427734375, + 641.1035461425781 + ], + [ + 227.052, + 641.1035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Declarations", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 276.012, + 146.6881103515625 + ], + [ + 341.707763671875, + 146.6881103515625 + ], + [ + 341.707763671875, + 159.603515625 + ], + [ + 276.012, + 159.603515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 168.3, + 81.537841796875 + ], + [ + 445.24017333984375, + 81.537841796875 + ], + [ + 445.24017333984375, + 105.17718505859375 + ], + [ + 168.3, + 105.17718505859375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER SETTING CONDITIONS OF RELEASE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 173.19599999999997, + 236.51999999999998 + ], + [ + 439.89495849609375, + 236.51999999999998 + ], + [ + 439.89495849609375, + 252.9735107421875 + ], + [ + 173.19599999999997, + 252.9735107421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS OF RELEASE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 192.78000000000003, + 68.03999999999999 + ], + [ + 418.22271728515625, + 68.03999999999999 + ], + [ + 418.22271728515625, + 82.95562744140625 + ], + [ + 192.78000000000003, + 82.95562744140625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS OF RELEASE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 192.168, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 413.72833251953125, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 413.72833251953125, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 192.168, + 81.0 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ADVICE OF PENALTIES AND SANCTIONS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 183.6, + 55.08000000000001 + ], + [ + 405.83062744140625, + 55.08000000000001 + ], + [ + 405.83062744140625, + 68.03999999999999 + ], + [ + 183.6, + 68.03999999999999 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Acknowledgment of the Defendant", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 215.42399999999998, + 379.08000000000004 + ], + [ + 381.2959289550781, + 379.08000000000004 + ], + [ + 381.2959289550781, + 391.4421081542969 + ], + [ + 215.42399999999998, + 391.4421081542969 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Directions to the United States Marshal", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 205.02, + 563.76 + ], + [ + 394.8496398925781, + 563.76 + ], + [ + 394.8496398925781, + 575.91 + ], + [ + 205.02, + 575.91 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "!TAIL DISPOSITION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 255.81599999999997, + 199.26 + ], + [ + 348.3009033203125, + 199.26 + ], + [ + 348.3009033203125, + 210.60000000000002 + ], + [ + 255.81599999999997, + 210.60000000000002 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS/ADDITIONAL PROCEEDINGS/COMMENTS:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 44.676, + 478.71 + ], + [ + 375.78094482421875, + 478.71 + ], + [ + 375.78094482421875, + 492.26123046875 + ], + [ + 44.676, + 492.26123046875 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 86 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 23 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 50 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 138 + ], + [ + "Line", + 56 + ], + [ + "Text", + 32 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 23 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 98 + ], + [ + "Line", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 623 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "PageHeader", + 6 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "Figure", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 430 + ], + [ + "Text", + 50 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02845770" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845770/_page_6_Figure_15.jpeg b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845770/_page_6_Figure_15.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bdd248786438bedf7c198e91988ab42cec0a6c96 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845770/_page_6_Figure_15.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:0b19dcdc8fdc267c2573c2096f1af4b73ab76bf8e321dbccbe951057fb089885 +size 112405 diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845778/EFTA02845778.md b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845778/EFTA02845778.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0f85c75fd7908b09c6ac5bc459985c1d6b84a65e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845778/EFTA02845778.md @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, + +-against- + +TOVA NOEL and MICHAEL + +Defendants. + +ANALISA District Judge: + +USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: 11/25/2019 + +19 Cr. 830 (AT) + +ORDER + +It is hereby ORDERED that the conditions of Defendant Tova Noel's pretrial release shall be modified as follows: travel is permitted to the Middle District of Pennsylvania. + +SO ORDERED. + +Dated: November 25, 2019 New York, New York + +> ANALISA United States District Judge \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845778/EFTA02845778.metadata.json b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845778/EFTA02845778.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a59356f6650426c9254daf9fb5a7dba5d37b72f4 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845778/EFTA02845778.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,58 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845778.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 523, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.63, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 44 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02845778" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845779/EFTA02845779.md b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845779/EFTA02845779.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2a1e49b66fa8b1aa5a091d44fd3a1901a6b5cece --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845779/EFTA02845779.md @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, + +-against- + +TOVA NOEL and MICHAEL + +Defendants. + +USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: 11/25/2019 + +19 Cr. 830 (AT) + +ORDER + +ANALISA District Judge: + +It is hereby ORDERED that the conditions of Defendant Michael pretrial release shall be modified as follows: the time by which two financially responsible persons must co-sign Mr. IM personal recognizance bond is extended to December 3, 2019. + +SO ORDERED. + +Dated: November 25, 2019 New York, New York + +> ANALISA United States District Judge \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845779/EFTA02845779.metadata.json b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845779/EFTA02845779.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..34c8099457ee921be7a34f9006fa8f63e2c9c3eb --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845779/EFTA02845779.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,58 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845779.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 593, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.64, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 46 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02845779" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845780/EFTA02845780.md b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845780/EFTA02845780.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d10ae77065f3b4dff2e2b3e5affd10b27f11cab9 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845780/EFTA02845780.md @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ +LAW OFFICES OF MONTELL FIGGINS, LLC Montell Figgins, Esq., Attorney ID#: 036912003 17 Academy St., Suite 305 Newark, New Jersey 07102 T: (973) 242 — 4700 F: (973) 242 — 4701 Attorneys for Defendant + +## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK + +UNITED STATES OF AMERICA + +Plaintiff, + +v. Case No.: I:19-cr-830 + +MICHAEL + +Defendant. NOTICE OF APPEARANCE + +To: The Clerk of the Court and all parties of record + +Notice is hereby given of the entry of the undersigned as counsel for the Defendant, MICHAEL in the above-entitled action and request that copies of all papers in this action be served upon the undersigned. + +> Montell Figgins, Esq. Law Offices of Montell Figgins, LLC 17 Academy Street, Suite 305 Newark, New Jersey 07102 + +Dated: November 26, 2019 + +Respectfully submitted, + +/s/Montell Figgins Montell Figgins, Esq. Law Offices of Montell Figgins \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845780/EFTA02845780.metadata.json b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845780/EFTA02845780.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0c3e0c319a73b99d278b897931a586bb155f8505 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845780/EFTA02845780.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845780.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 867, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.84, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 192.78000000000003, + 195.20999999999998 + ], + [ + 418.09381103515625, + 195.20999999999998 + ], + [ + 418.09381103515625, + 224.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 192.78000000000003, + 224.2330322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02845780" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845781/EFTA02845781.md b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845781/EFTA02845781.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b15b6a4f483fc3f06e0d21cbfcc4c44fd7b6b701 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845781/EFTA02845781.md @@ -0,0 +1,57 @@ +UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK + +x + +UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PROTECTIVE ORDER + +19 Cr. 830 (AT) + +TOVA NOEL and MICHAEL + +Defendants. + +x + +On the motion of the United States of America, by the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Geoffrey S. Berman, by Assistant United States Attorneys Rebekah Donaleski, Nicolas Roos, and Jessica Lonergan; and with the consent of TOVA NOEL and MICHAEL , the defendants, by and through their respective counsel of record: + +WHEREAS, TOVA NOEL and MICHAEL , the defendants, have certain rights under the United States Constitution, federal statutes, and the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, to pretrial discovery; + +WHEREAS, the Government recognizes its obligation to provide such discovery materials to the defendants, consistent with the need to protect the confidentiality of ongoing investigations and the confidentiality interests of others; + +WHEREAS, the discovery that the Government intends to provide to the defendants contain materials that, if disseminated to third parties, could, among other things, impede ongoing investigations and implicate the privacy and confidentiality interests of third parties; + +WHEREAS, the Government has demonstrated good cause for the relief set forth herein; + +WHEREAS, TOVA NOEL and MICHAEL , the defendants, by and through their respective counsel of record, consent to the entry of this Order; + +NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16(d): + +1. Discovery materials designated as "Protected Materials" by the Government may be used by the defendants, their respective counsel of record, and their respective counsel of record's agents (collectively, the "Defense") only for purposes of defending the charges, in connection with any sentencing, and pursuing any appeals, in relation to this criminal action. + +2. The Protected Materials and the information contained or disclosed therein: + +a. Shall not be disclosed in any form by the Defense to any third party except as set forth in paragraphs 2(b), 3, and 4 below; + +b. May be disclosed to third parties only by the defendants' respective counsel of record and only to the following persons (collectively, "Designated Persons"): + +i. investigative, secretarial, clerical, paralegal and student personnel employed full-time or part-time by the defendants' respective counsel of record and who are actually participating in the legal defense of this action; + +ii. independent expert witnesses, jury consultants, document hosting personnel, or investigators retained by the defendants in connection with this action; + +iii. such other persons as hereafter may be authorized by the Court upon a motion by the defendants; and + +iv. Shall be destroyed or returned to the Government following the conclusion of this case, including after any appeals. + +3. The Defense may show (but not otherwise provide) the Protected Materials to fact witnesses ("Fact Witnesses") interviewed by the defendants' respective counsel of record or by the Designated Persons in the course of investigating this action. + +4. The Defense shall provide a copy of this Order to Designated Persons to whom materials subject to the protections of this Order are disclosed pursuant to paragraph 2(b), or Fact Witnesses to whom materials subject to the protections of this Order are shown pursuant to paragraph (3). Designated Persons and Fact Witnesses shall be subject to the terms of this Order. + +5. With respect to any discovery material designated as Protected Materials that the Defense intends to file publicly or to specifically describe in a public filing, the defendant making the filing must either (i) file the discovery material under seal, or (ii) provide reasonable notice to the Government to permit the parties to confer on the proper treatment of the discovery material. If the parties are unable to reach agreement as to whether redactions to the public filings are warranted, or to the extent of such redactions, the parties will seek Court resolution before the document is publicly filed or specifically described in a public filing. + +6. Any disputes regarding the designation of discovery material as Protected Materials, or any other dispute concerning this Order, which cannot be resolved among the parties, will be brought to the Court for a ruling before any public disclosure not permitted by this Order is made. + +Dated: New York, New York December , 2019 + +SO ORDERED: + +THE HONORABLE ANALISA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845781/EFTA02845781.metadata.json b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845781/EFTA02845781.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c994a5470afba7db7acdb0f42ba28eda9af4de7e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845781/EFTA02845781.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,194 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845781.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 5, + "chars": 4533, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.82, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 21 + ], + [ + "Line", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 23 + ], + [ + "Line", + 12 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02845781" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845786/EFTA02845786.md b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845786/EFTA02845786.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..46197eef11adf5c762560010ef80f47f75b5c153 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845786/EFTA02845786.md @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ +![](_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg) + +United States Attorney Southern District of New York + +The Silvio J. Mollo Building One Saint Andrews Plaza New York. New York 10007 + +December 16, 2019 + +## BY ECF + +The Honorable Analisa United States District Judge Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, New York 10007 + +Re: United States v. Noel and 19 Cr. 830 (AT) + +Dear Judge + +The Government writes, with the consent of defense counsel, to enclose a proposed protective order for the Court's review and endorsement. + +Respectfully submitted, + +GEOFFREY S. BERMAN United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York + +By: /5/ Rebekah Donaleski Nicolas Roos Jessica Lonergan Assistant United States Attorneys (212) 637-2423/2421/1038 + +cc: Defense Counsel (by ECF) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845786/EFTA02845786.metadata.json b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845786/EFTA02845786.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..94af94eaf29cede63880f690a04a16bc1af0ab2b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845786/EFTA02845786.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,115 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845786.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 765, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.74, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "U.S. Department of Justice", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 318.85200000000003, + 25.92 + ], + [ + 464.32379150390625, + 25.92 + ], + [ + 464.32379150390625, + 40.56353759765625 + ], + [ + 318.85200000000003, + 40.56353759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "BY ECF", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.932, + 179.82 + ], + [ + 118.97271728515625, + 179.82 + ], + [ + 118.97271728515625, + 194.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 67.932, + 194.2330322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02845786" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845786/_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845786/_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..67e980b262f12ad2205904419eb2f411c85eedda --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845786/_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:0fdb9cbf5df749228436f2cae20410c6c6c971dd06531248c3174f93ab7b6331 +size 3000 diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845787/EFTA02845787.md b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845787/EFTA02845787.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e9c1a62ec620fb570b4a9f5dcb82af1b7cdb972d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845787/EFTA02845787.md @@ -0,0 +1,747 @@ +UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, + +v. + +TOVA NOEL, MICHAEL \$ + +Defendants. + +Before: + +x + +19 CR 830 (AT)(SN) + +New York, N.Y. November 19, 2019 3:54 p.m. + +HON. SARAH NETBURN, + +Magistrate Judge + +APPEARANCES + +GEOFFREY S. BERMAN, United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York NICOLAS ROOS REBEKAH DONALESKI Assistant United States Attorneys + +JASON FOY Attorney for Defendant Noel + +MONTEL FIGGINS Attorney for Defendant + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +(Case called) + +MR. ROOS: Good afternoon, your Honor. Nicolas Roos and Rebekah Donaleski for the United States. + +THE COURT: Thank you. + +MR. FOY: May it please the Court, your Honor, my name is Jason Foy, attorney for Ms. Tovah Noel, standing to my left. Good afternoon, your Honor. + +THE COURT: Good afternoon. Thank you. Good afternoon. + +MR. FIGGINS: Good afternoon, your Honor. Montel Figgins, from the Law Offices of Montel Figgins, on behalf of Michael , who's standing to my left. + +THE COURT: Thank you. Good afternoon to all of you. My name is Judge Netburn. + +Can I have the date and time of the defendants' arrests? + +MR. ROOS: Both defendants self-surrendered to the FBI this morning at approximately 10:00 a.m. + +THE COURT: Thank you. + +The purpose of today's proceeding is to advise you of certain rights that you have, inform you of the charges against you, consider whether counsel shall be appointed for you, and decide under what conditions, if any, you shall be released. + +I'm now going to explain certain constitutional rights that you have. + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +You have the right to remain silent. You are not required to make any statements. Even if you have already made statements to the authorities, you need not make any further statements. Any statements that you do make can be used against you. + +You have the right to be released, either conditionally or unconditionally, pending trial unless I find that there are no conditions that would reasonably assure your presence in court or the safety of the community. + +You have the right to be represented by an attorney during all court proceedings, including this one and during all questioning by the authorities. + +If you cannot afford an attorney, I will appoint one to represent you. I understand that each of you has retained private counsel. If at any point in time you run out of money and you are unable to afford counsel, you can petition the Court to appoint counsel at the government's expense and at no cost to you. + +You both have been charged in a six-count indictment, and I will just state that I understand that Judge has referred this not just for presentment but also for arraignment. + +MR. ROOS: That's correct, your Honor. + +THE COURT: The defendants have both been charged in a six-count indictment. + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +Count One charges the defendants with conspiracy in violation of Title 18 of United States Code, Section 371. And Counts Two through Six each charge an individual act of false records in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1001(a)(3) and (2). + +Let me ask, Ms. Noel, have you received a copy of this indictment? + +DEFENDANT NOEL: Yes, your Honor. + +THE COURT: Have you had an opportunity to review it and discuss the charges with your lawyer? + +DEFENDANT NOEL: Yes, your Honor. + +THE COURT: Would you like me to read the indictment to you in open court? + +DEFENDANT NOEL: No, thank you. + +THE COURT: How do you plead to the charges? + +DEFENDANT NOEL: Not guilty. + +THE COURT: Thank you. + +DEFENDANT NOEL: You're welcome. + +THE COURT: Mr. I'm going to ask you the same questions. + +Have you received a copy of the indictment? + +DEFENDANT : Yes, your Honor. + +THE COURT: Have you had an opportunity to read the indictment and discuss the charges with your lawyer? + +DEFENDANT : Yes, your Honor. + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +THE COURT: Would you like me to read the indictment to you in open court? + +DEFENDANT : No, your Honor. + +THE COURT: How do you plead to the charges? + +DEFENDANT : Not guilty, your Honor. + +THE COURT: Thank you. Be seated. + +Have the parties discussed an appropriate bail package? + +MR. ROOS: Yes, your Honor. + +THE COURT: Shall we begin with Ms. Noel? + +MR. ROOS: Certainly, your Honor. I actually think the bail packages are nearly identical with the exception of one or two conditions that are set forth in the pretrial services report, so maybe I'll first give your Honor all of the conditions that are the same for each of the defendants and I will note the variation at the end. + +For both defendants, it's \$100,000 bond, secured by two financially responsible persons and their own signature; pretrial supervision, as directed; surrender of travel documents, and no new applications; no contact with codefendants; surrender of firearms. + +For travel restrictions, for Defendant , it will be Southern District of New York, Eastern District of New York, and the District of New Jersey. + +And for Defendant Noel, it will be Southern District + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +of New York, Eastern District of New York, District of New Jersey, and the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. + +And then the special conditions that are set forth in the pretrial reports, it's condition number 4, relating to use of alcohol for Defendant and condition 7 for Defendant Noel, which relates to mental health evaluation and treatment as directed by pretrial services. + +And, finally, your Honor, that they be both released today on their own signature. + +THE COURT: And how long do the parties propose to satisfy the balance of the conditions? + +MR. ROOS: A week is appropriate, your Honor, for the two cosigners. + +THE COURT: Any objection from defendants? + +MR. FIGGINS: No, your Honor. + +MR. FOY: There is one. + +THE COURT: Okay. + +MR. FOY: Before today's proceedings, we did have an agreement on the terms of release. And, of course, as part of that process, pretrial services is involved and they're not necessarily privy to the terms of our agreement. And I understand that we've added some things that were not part of the agreement, and I'm fine with that. But there's one condition I'm not fine with and I'd like your Honor to consider. + +With regards to the surrender of firearm, I'm asking that your Honor not make that a requirement of her release. I ask that because - in this nonviolent allegation, in which no firearm was involved, with a history of having no criminal record of any kind or any history of violence - she, who legally possesses and has a permit for the firearm, should still be able to possess her firearm because she's not a convicted felon and someone who's not permitted to do so. She's -- + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +THE COURT: Is that a duty firearm or personal use? + +MR. FOY: Personal. + +So that's the only issue that I have, because I think that at this time, to sacrifice that right that she legally has, and has complied with everything that it means to have that firearm, that she still be able to do so. I could imagine that there could be an argument about safety of others; however, there's nothing to really corroborate the fact that her continuing to possess her firearm, just like she has in the past, would actually endanger anyone. We voluntarily surrendered. We participated in a pretrial interview. There's just no reason for it, other than probably a policy that says that's what they would like to do. + +Now, it's a meaningful one, I'm not saying that it's a bad thing, but under the unique circumstances here, in this case, in the history and type of case that it is, I'm asking + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +that that one condition be withheld and with all the other conditions being fine. + +THE COURT: Just so I understand your argument, you would like your client to retain her personal-use firearm because she otherwise has the right to do so? She doesn't need it for any particular reason? + +MR. FOY: Well, I suppose a person who has a firearm may feel that they need it for their self-protection. Now, I'm not suggesting that there's been some specific threat or anything, other than the world is crazy, but if she hasn't done anything improper with regards to that important right, it shouldn't be sacrificed now, at an arraignment, as a condition of her release, when she has fully cooperated with everything up until this point. We've been in communication with the government since August 14th, and communicated about her international travel since this investigation began. All we've done is comply and put the government on notice as to her whereabouts and what's going on. We've been completely cooperative in that respect. + +But when you talk about removing someone's personal firearm, that they legally possess in their home - she doesn't have a license to carry it anywhere, just in her home - unless there is a reason connected to the case, to the crime, that suggests that it could be in fact a danger to a third party or someone else, then, in that case, I would understand, but not + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +in this kind of case, which is an allegation about documents. + +THE COURT: Understood. Thank you. + +I have a few responses. The first is, although I greatly appreciate when the parties are able to reach agreement on the terms of a defendant's release, that agreement is meaningful to me but it's certainly not controlling. I ultimately decide how defendants should be released. And there have been occasions where I've disagreed with an agreement between the parties. So the fact that you and the government reached agreement on certain terms, the terms that will be imposed may be different than that agreement. It's simply, the way that court proceeds. And the fact of the agreement - while very helpful and I appreciate it, and it suggests that the parties are working well together - doesn't necessarily mean that those are the conditions that I'm going to impose. + +The second thing to say with respect to the issue of firearms is that it is in fact a policy. It's not a policy of the U.S. Attorney's Office; it's a policy of our pretrial service office, because they are going to be sending officers in to enforce the terms of your client's release, and, as you said yourself, the world is crazy, and they have safety concerns, which isn't to say that they have specific safety concerns about Ms. Noel. And, as you point out, this case is not a violent case and there are not allegations that your client has engaged in violence, either in connection with this + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +case or in her history, but I need to be concerned about sending law enforcement officers who work for the Court, who are going to be supervising your client, and it is for their safety that we impose that condition. + +So I am going to impose the condition. I am going to require your client to surrender her firearm. Both defendants will have to surrender their firearms and their permits so that they can't secure new firearms. That is a safety precaution that we undertake to protect our people who are going to be enforcing the terms of this release. It has nothing to do with the government per se. + +So with that, I will release the defendants today on their own signature and the posting of \$100,000 bond that needs to be secured by two financially responsible cosigners. + +You're going to report, each of you, to your pretrial officer, as directed. + +I believe you've surrendered your travel documents, your passports, and the like. If you haven't, you need to surrender your travel documents, and you're prohibited from making any new travel applications. + +Each of you is prohibited from having contact with the other, meaning your codefendant, except in the presence of counsel. As I just stated, each of you needs to surrender any firearms, both personal use and duty firearms, and the permits that authorize those, to pretrial. + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +With respect to travel for Mr. your travel will be restricted to the Southern District of New York, the Eastern District of New York, and the District of New Jersey. + +And for Ms. Noel, your travel will be restricted to the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York, the District of New Jersey and the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. + +In addition, I'm imposing the requirement for Mr. that he refrain from the excessive use of alcohol, and, for Ms. Noel, the requirement that she -- I'm going to give the authority to pretrial to determine whether or not a mental health evaluation or support is needed, but that will be at the direction of your pretrial services officer. + +Let me warn each of you that if you fail to appear in court or if you violate any of the conditions of your release, a warrant will be issued for your arrest, and you and anybody who cosigned the bond may be responsible for paying its full amount, which is \$100,000, and you will be charged with a separate crime of bail-jumping. + +In addition, if you commit an offense while you're on pretrial supervision, you may be subject to a more severe punishment than you would receive if you committed the very same offense at any other time. + +Has Judge set the next conference date? + +MR. ROOS: Yes, your Honor. The judge set it for November 25, 2019. + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +And the government would move to exclude time between today's date and that date so that the government may produce discovery and the defense may begin to review the discovery. + +THE COURT: Thank you. + +Any objections from defense counsel? + +MR. FOY: No, your Honor. + +MR. FIGGINS: No, Judge. I think there is just an issue of the timing of the court date. The time -- + +THE COURT: You should just reach out to Judge deputy. I'm sure, if necessary, it can be rescheduled. For now, I'm going to exclude time, on defendants' consent, from today to November 25th. + +Anything further from either side? + +MR. ROOS: No, your Honor. Thank you. + +MR. FOY: No, thank you, your Honor. + +MR. FIGGINS: No, Judge. Thank you. + +THE COURT: Thank you, everybody. + +\* \* \* \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845787/EFTA02845787.metadata.json b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845787/EFTA02845787.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9f8677cb6a7b21bdde822b6a6616f20cd91f5d20 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845787/EFTA02845787.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,432 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845787.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 12, + "chars": 14633, + "elapsed_seconds": 2.05, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 53 + ], + [ + "Text", + 39 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 36 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 31 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 40 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 104 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 36 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 34 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 104 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 29 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 28 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 104 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 28 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 30 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 31 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "Text", + 36 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02845787" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845799/EFTA02845799.md b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845799/EFTA02845799.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8b0b89b428ed38f380a7b0ab92a12b9c36ce2162 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845799/EFTA02845799.md @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +## IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK + +UNITED STATES OF AM + +USA / Plaintiff(s) + +Case No.: 19CR830 + +TOVA NOEL ET AL., + +Defendant(s) + +## NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT + +Notice is hereby given that an official transcript of a )NFEREN( held on 11 /1 9/ 19 has been filed by the court reporter/transcriber in the above-captioned matter. + +Redaction responsibilities apply to the attorneys of record or pro se parties, even if the person requesting the transcript is a judge or a member of the public or media. + +The parties have seven (7) calendar days from the date of filing of this NOTICE to file with the court any NOTICE OF INTENT TO REQUEST REDACTION of this transcript. A copy of said NOTICE must also be served on the court reporter. If no such NOTICE is filed, the transcript may be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after ninety (90) calendar days. + +This process may only be used to redact the following personal data identifiers: Social Security numbers; dates of birth; minors' names; and financial account numbers. See Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2, and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 49.1. Parties wishing to request redaction of other information may proceed by motion. + +I (we) certify that the foregoing is a correct transcript from the record of proceedings in the aboveentitled matter. + +/s ANDREW WA + +( 'OuI t Reporter/Transcriber Date \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845799/EFTA02845799.metadata.json b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845799/EFTA02845799.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9ab5d97e4b7316b9e9854abff073c07cacad67df --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845799/EFTA02845799.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,109 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845799.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1441, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.92, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nFOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 153.612, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 418.669189453125, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 418.669189453125, + 96.363037109375 + ], + [ + 153.612, + 96.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 167.688, + 307.79999999999995 + ], + [ + 448.919921875, + 307.79999999999995 + ], + [ + 448.919921875, + 322.4830627441406 + ], + [ + 167.688, + 322.4830627441406 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02845799" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845800/EFTA02845800.md b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845800/EFTA02845800.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..60b04d90adea78e5490d290a2fcc40fa4b6fa698 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845800/EFTA02845800.md @@ -0,0 +1,59 @@ +UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK + +x + +![](_page_0_Picture_4.jpeg) + +UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PROTECTIVE ORDER + +TOVA NOEL and MICHAEL + +Defendants. + +x + +19 Cr. 830 (AT) + +On the motion of the United States of America, by the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Geoffrey S. Berman, by Assistant United States Attorneys Rebekah Donaleski, Nicolas Roos, and Jessica Lonergan; and with the consent of TOVA NOEL and MICHAEL , the defendants, by and through their respective counsel of record: + +WHEREAS, TOVA NOEL and MICHAEL , the defendants, have certain rights under the United States Constitution, federal statutes, and the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, to pretrial discovery; + +WHEREAS, the Government recognizes its obligation to provide such discovery materials to the defendants, consistent with the need to protect the confidentiality of ongoing investigations and the confidentiality interests of others; + +WHEREAS, the discovery that the Government intends to provide to the defendants contain materials that, if disseminated to third parties, could, among other things, impede ongoing investigations and implicate the privacy and confidentiality interests of third parties; + +WHEREAS, the Government has demonstrated good cause for the relief set forth herein; + +WHEREAS, TOVA NOEL and MICHAEL , the defendants, by and through their respective counsel of record, consent to the entry of this Order; + +NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16(d): + +1. Discovery materials designated as "Protected Materials" by the Government may be used by the defendants, their respective counsel of record, and their respective counsel of record's agents (collectively, the "Defense") only for purposes of defending the charges, in connection with any sentencing, and pursuing any appeals, in relation to this criminal action. + +2. The Protected Materials and the information contained or disclosed therein: + +a. Shall not be disclosed in any form by the Defense to any third party except as set forth in paragraphs 2(b), 3, and 4 below; + +b. May be disclosed to third parties only by the defendants' respective counsel of record and only to the following persons (collectively, "Designated Persons"): + +i. investigative, secretarial, clerical, paralegal and student personnel employed full-time or part-time by the defendants' respective counsel of record and who are actually participating in the legal defense of this action; + +ii. independent expert witnesses, jury consultants, document hosting personnel, or investigators retained by the defendants in connection with this action; + +iii. such other persons as hereafter may be authorized by the Court upon a motion by the defendants; and + +iv. Shall be destroyed or returned to the Government following the conclusion of this case, including after any appeals. + +3. The Defense may show (but not otherwise provide) the Protected Materials to fact witnesses ("Fact Witnesses") interviewed by the defendants' respective counsel of record or by the Designated Persons in the course of investigating this action. + +4. The Defense shall provide a copy of this Order to Designated Persons to whom materials subject to the protections of this Order are disclosed pursuant to paragraph 2(b), or Fact Witnesses to whom materials subject to the protections of this Order are shown pursuant to paragraph (3). Designated Persons and Fact Witnesses shall be subject to the terms of this Order. + +5. With respect to any discovery material designated as Protected Materials that the Defense intends to file publicly or to specifically describe in a public filing, the defendant making the filing must either (i) file the discovery material under seal, or (ii) provide reasonable notice to the Government to permit the parties to confer on the proper treatment of the discovery material. If the parties are unable to reach agreement as to whether redactions to the public filings are warranted, or to the extent of such redactions, the parties will seek Court resolution before the document is publicly filed or specifically described in a public filing. + +6. Any disputes regarding the designation of discovery material as Protected Materials, or any other dispute concerning this Order, which cannot be resolved among the parties, will be brought to the Court for a ruling before any public disclosure not permitted by this Order is made. + +Dated: New York, New York December 16, 2019 + +SO ORDERED: + +THE HONORABLE ANALISA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845800/EFTA02845800.metadata.json b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845800/EFTA02845800.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4f3beffd2202bfc5ad57933a20d3355d93491aec --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845800/EFTA02845800.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,200 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845800.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 5, + "chars": 4564, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.27, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_0_Picture_4.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 21 + ], + [ + "Line", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 23 + ], + [ + "Line", + 12 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02845800" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845800/_page_0_Picture_4.jpeg b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845800/_page_0_Picture_4.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cc4978d4a804bb16d26241f2ad5f1fea0a62d9a7 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845800/_page_0_Picture_4.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:d8e3e53c1f9b2bf80b366c5301aedb29641db142b16cee0152e578fb11ad2acf +size 16478 diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845805/EFTA02845805.md b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845805/EFTA02845805.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..50cd1dface4c8d9a533d305bd8ff585a04417308 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845805/EFTA02845805.md @@ -0,0 +1,775 @@ +UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, + +v. + +TOVA NOEL and MICHAEL + +Defendants. + +Before: + +x + +HON. ANALISA + +## APPEARANCES + +GEOFFREY S. BERMAN + +United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York + +BY: REBEKAH A. DONALESKI + +NICOLAS T. ROOS Assistant United States Attorneys + +FOY & SEPLOWITZ LLC + +Attorneys for Defendant Noel + +BY: JASON E. FOY + +MONTEL FIGGINS + +Attorney for Defendant + +19 Cr. 830 (AT) + +Conference + +New York, N.Y. November 25, 2019 12:00 p.m. + +District Judge + +4 Would you make your appearances, please. + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 THE DEFENDANT: Good afternoon, your Honor. + +10 11 12 MR. FIGGINS: Good afternoon, your Honor. Montel Figgins on behalf of Michael , who is presently in court, standing to my left. + +13 THE COURT: Please be seated. + +14 15 Has the prosecutor finished delivering discovery to the defendants? + +16 MS. DONALESKI: No, your Honor. + +17 18 19 20 21 The defendants self-surrendered last Tuesday, on November 19. They were presented and arraigned that day. We notified defense counsel we would begin producing discovery once a protective order is in place, and we will do so on a rolling basis. + +22 THE COURT: When do you expect to be finished? + +23 24 25 MS. DONALESKI: We anticipate that we'll need a month to complete production of the discovery currently in our possession. + +THE COURT: Good afternoon. + +We're here in the matter of United States v. Tova Noel and Michael + +MS. DONALESKI: Good afternoon, your Honor. Rebekah Donaleski and Nicolas Roos for the government. + +MR. FOY: My name is Jason Foy, attorney for Ms. Noel. Good afternoon, your Honor. + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +THE COURT: When do you expect the protective order to be in place? + +MS. DONALESKI: Your Honor, we'll provide a draft to defense counsel within the next day, and then depending on how long it takes for them to comment on it and the parties to reach a resolution, we'll provide it to the Court as expeditiously as possible, so it's my hope that that can happen within a week. + +THE COURT: All right. By the end of December, discovery should have been produced. Is that correct? + +MS. DONALESKI: That's fine, your Honor. + +THE COURT: It's not voluminous, is it? + +MS. DONALESKI: Your Honor, it will consist of hundreds of hours of video recording, so in that aspect it will be voluminous, but the paper records, the bank records will not be voluminous. + +THE COURT: All right. It doesn't seem that you would need more than a month to review the discovery so that by the end of January, you should have made decisions as to whether you're going to be filing motions. Correct? + +MR. FIGGINS: Your Honor, if I may? + +I also know that there's an ongoing inspector general's report. I don't have any idea as to the time frame, if and when that's going to be completed. i do believe that there would be some pertinent information, relevant information + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +in that report, so if we could get some -- if they have any idea as to when that's going to conclude, I do believe that that may have some impact in terms of information that we desire to have as well as I do believe that we're also going to be subpoenaing some documents as well. But I don't think we would need more than the end of January, presumably, to have an idea to convey to the Court where we are with respect to moving forward with motions. + +MS. DONALESKI: Your Honor, we'll provide the discovery in our possession to the defendants by the end of December. I don't know of a basis to hold up a criminal case based on a DOJ inspector general report, and I don't have a time line of when that will be completed. + +MR. FOY: Your Honor, I agree that by the end of January we should be in a position to assess what motions, if any, will be necessary. We'll also be in a position to determine whether there are any issues regard to discovery or additional information at that point. + +MR. FIGGINS: And your Honor -- + +THE COURT: One moment, please. + +You'll return to court on January 30 at 11 a.m. that will be a control date -- and you'll let me know whether you expect to file motions. + +Now, with respect to a trial date, April 20. + +MR. FIGGINS: That's fine for us. + +MS. DONALESKI: That's fine for the government, your Honor. + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +THE COURT: How long do you expect the trial to last? + +MR. FOY: Your Honor, I would say it's fine. I mean, as it looks right now, but based on some of the things I'm anticipating, I don't know if that would be enough time and maybe we want to wait and see, because I need to see the discovery before I can say definitively that, yes, April 20 is an appropriate date. But for now certainly that would be fair. + +THE COURT: We're told that the discovery consists of video and documents. I don't understand why you can't anticipate whether you can go forward on the 20th. + +MR. FOY: Because I haven't seen what those documents are and what impact it might have on the defense of the case as well as my thoughts on some additional documents that may go beyond what they believe Rule 16 requires. I can imagine a situation where we feel that there's more to be provided than what the government provides. We're not there yet, so I'm not suggesting that it's definitely going to be an issue, but I did want to alert the Court early on of the possibility. But once I get the discovery, I'll be in a position to say more affirmatively. + +THE COURT: What else are you expecting? + +MR. FOY: You mean as far as discovery? + +THE COURT: You're talking in vague terms about + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +something else coming up, and I'd like to know what that is. + +MR. FOY: Well, your Honor, based on our view of the case, I believe there are outside circumstances that are driving this prosecution that may impact certain information that's available to us in the regular discovery. + +It's hard for me to say without seeing anything, so right now it's just kind of in my mind, and I don't want to mislead the Court to suggest it's all going to be finished in time for April 20. It may be, and that may be fine, but it's hard for me to say having not received or reviewed the discovery. I've only seen the indictment. + +I'm just alerting the Court. I'm not saying we can't do it, but I don't want to not say it when it's something that could potentially be an issue. I'm not saying we're trying to hold it up or slow down the pace unnecessarily, but I can see getting information that may impact on the defense in particular, Brady material in particular. + +THE COURT: Brady material? + +MR. FOY: Correct, but it's hard to say specifically without seeing the discovery. + +THE COURT: All right. You have not persuaded me. I'm setting the trial for April 20. + +How long do you expect the trial to go? + +MS. DONALESKI: Approximately a week, your Honor, for the government's case. + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +MR. FIGGINS: Your Honor, I would think it would probably be about five days on our case. + +And your Honor, I did want to ask the Court or we would like to at least get some type of idea with respect to the status of the inspector general's report. I do think that it's beyond relevant; it's an investigation into what happened here. There's going to be multiple details of information and interviews and statements and things of that nature regarding this particular case, so on and so forth. So I would ask at least the Court to see if we can get a time frame from the government if that report is going to be imminently due or what type of time frame we're looking at, because I do believe there are going to be would need that then maybe even a lot of relevant facts in that report, that we information. And then we would need time to investigate based on some of that information. + +that? THE COURT: Does the government know anything about + +MS. DONALESKI: Your Honor, I don't. And I'll just clarify that to the extent counsel's asking for a summary of the results of the criminal investigation, obviously we'll be turning over in discovery all of the underlying results of the criminal investigation. So I'm a little puzzled as to what defense counsel is saying that he needs. I don't have a time frame on the inspector general report, but the government will produce to the defense all of the relevant discovery materials + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +in this matter, which includes the Rule 16 materials relevant to the criminal charges that have been brought against the defendants. + +MR. FIGGINS: Your Honor, to be more specific, one of the issues here is going to be the conditions and the supervision and the policies that were upheld and advanced by the Bureau of Prisons. That is what the inspector general's report is investigating. That's very important information that's relevant to this case and relevant to the defense. I'm not saying we have to hold up our case forever, but we should at least get some type of idea as to the status of that report and when it's going to come out or when they're going to complete the actual report because I believe that there's going to be a lot of information that may be relevant to our defense, and it may not be specifically just about this particular investigation. + +There's been multiple information in the media now with respect to testimony by the head of the Bureau of Prisons, information released by the U.S. Attorney himself regarding this investigation with respect to this case, so I believe that we will need that information. If we're hearing that those people are making statements about that report with respect to this case, clearly there's going to be information and potentially statements and other information that we may need. So I think it's important that we at least try to get an idea + +of when that report may be completed. + +THE COURT: I'm putting the matter on for trial on the 20th of April. It's a firm date, and I am giving you two weeks for trial. + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +Are there any further applications? + +MS. DONALESKI: The government moves to exclude time between today's date and April 20, 2020, in order to allow the defendants to review discovery and prepare for trial. + +MR. FOY: Yes, I do have another application, your Honor. + +As I alerted the Court prior to today's court proceedings, I wanted to revisit the issue of the release conditions for Ms. Noel at this time. + +On November 19, we appeared before the magistrate court. The government and Ms. Noel had an agreement with regards to the bail package. After our interview with pretrial services, they added additional conditions that were not a part of the original agreement. Of the additional conditions, one of them was travel restrictions. + +One of the permissible areas at the time that was stated on the record was the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Turns out that it should be the Middle District of Pennsylvania instead of the eastern, so I'd like that to be corrected. But the second issue, which is really the main subject of this application, is with regards to the surrender of her firearms, + +4 5 6 During the proceedings before the magistrate court, I presented arguments in favor of her ability to keep her firearm. I'm asking for this Court to reconsider that decision and provide an individualized assessment of whether that condition is appropriate under the circumstances of this case. + +7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Your Honor, this case involves allegations of nonviolent criminal conduct. I do not believe that there's a controversy of whether she's a flight risk or danger to the community. What has been said to me with regards to why the application for the firearm has been made by pretrial services is to make them more comfortable so when they come to the home there's not a firearm in the home. + +14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 I do appreciate the fact that pretrial services needs to be safe, and I don't deny that. However, when it comes to infringing upon her Second Amendment right to possess her firearm that she has legally, that's personal to her, I also would like to make one correction in the record from my previous presentation, because I indicated to the Court at that time that she possessed it legally and that she just has it for the home. + +22 23 24 25 Well, it turns out she does have credentials to actually carry her firearm in public as it relates to her job. I suspect that that could change if something happened with her job as a result of these proceedings, but that wouldn't change + +which Ms. Noel has already complied with. + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +her ability to actually possess her firearm should her job status change, meaning there may become a change in her ability to carry it publicly because of a change of job situation, but it won't impact her constitutional right to actually bear arms. + +Under 3142, the Court should consider the least restrictive methods, in this case, I think, address the safety issue being raised by pretrial services. + +If you look at Ms. Noel's history and character, she doesn't have a prior criminal record. She has no history of violence or bad conduct that might indicate that she is a physical threat, that she would use her firearm against another unwarrantedly. + +The pretrial services report was done by the person who's going to supervise her. I've had an opportunity to speak to pretrial services about this application, that I would be making this application, and fortunately, having worked with the pretrial services officer, he respectfully disagreed with my position and mentioned to me that one of the concerns is what happens if I come to the home and the gun is out? That's a problem. + +Well, it could be a problem, I suppose, but it's not like a dog who has its own will and may go bite someone. In fact, I submit to the Court that if my client had a dog that wasn't friendly to strangers, that one of the remedies we would say is when they come from pretrial services, you have to put + +the dog away. What I'm suggesting to your Honor in the least restrictive manner is that we can make sure that if anyone from pretrial services comes to the home, that she will secure the gun away so that it's not out, since that seems to be their concern. + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +She doesn't have any ill will towards the court staff or anyone a part of this process. She understands what she needs to do. There is no actual, credible, competent threat supported by evidence to suggest that at this time her constitutional right to possess her weapon should be infringed at this time. + +I suppose there could come a time where that could change, but when we take it now, without an individual assessment of her particulars, her background, the specific circumstances of the case, then it gives the impression as if the conclusion's foregone that she should be -- meaning in this case a felon deprived of her firearm. She's not. She remains innocent as we sit here today, and the fact that she's here is disappointing, but we're here, so we have to deal with it. + +All I'm asking for is fair consideration in an individualized way. Any concern that your Honor has about her possessing a firearm, I'd welcome you to address it with me so I have an opportunity to directly speak to your concerns. + +THE COURT: I'll hear from the government. + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +MS. DONALESKI: Your Honor, with respect to modifying the travel restrictions, we have no objection to including her travel restriction to the Middle District of Pennsylvania. + +With respect to the firearm, defense counsel raised this in front of Judge Netburn last week, who had the opportunity to consult with pretrial services. She denied this request, as your Honor should do. + +We respectfully submit it is due to the safety concerns of pretrial services that the defendant should not be permitted to possess her firearm. The pretrial services officers have to go into the defendant's home, including at unscheduled visits, and due to their safety concerns with having a defendant who has access to a firearm and they may not know where the firearm is in the home, it's entirely reasonable for pretrial services to say as a policy defendants have to surrender their firearms. + +This is done in every case, your Honor, including law enforcement officers who are on pretrial services supervision. Defendants are required to give their firearms back or to surrender their firearms simply for the safety of the pretrial services officers who are going into their homes. And given that safety concern, we believe that it is appropriate, as Judge Netburn found, for that to be a condition of her release. + +THE COURT: The removal of the firearm is a commonsense safety measure. The application is denied. + +4 5 6 7 8 9 10 With respect to Mr. , last week, we asked for a week to get two additional cosigners. I would just ask the Court to give us another seven days. I've submitted the information to the U.S. Attorney's Office, but they still need to conduct their interview. I just don't want there to be any issues with respect to having it completed by tomorrow, so I would just ask the Court to extend it another seven days with respect to getting those signers and getting it approved. + +11 12 MS. DONALESKI: We have no objection to that, your Honor. + +13 14 15 16 THE COURT: All right. That deadline is extended by a week. And I certainly have no objection to the Middle District of Pennsylvania being included in those areas where Ms. Noel is permitted to travel. + +17 Is there anything further? + +18 19 MS. DONALESKI: We'll just request a ruling on our application to exclude time, your Honor. + +20 21 THE COURT: Yes. The application is granted. Time is excluded. + +22 Is that without objection? + +23 MR. FOY: That is without objection, your Honor. + +24 MR. FIGGINS: That's fine, your Honor. + +25 THE COURT: Time is excluded under the Speedy Trial + +Are there any further applications? + +MR. FIGGINS: Yes, your Honor. + +Act until April 20, 2020. I find that the ends of justice served by excluding such time outweigh the interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial because this will allow time for the prosecution to produce discovery, for the defense to consider it, to decide whether to prepare motions, and for the parties to discuss a possible disposition. + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +a + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +The defendants' bail status shall remain the same. + +The matter is adjourned. + +(Adjourned) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845805/EFTA02845805.metadata.json b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845805/EFTA02845805.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2ea0c1449f585504e70aa4bc0daa783ad73f5d7f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845805/EFTA02845805.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,562 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845805.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 15, + "chars": 19021, + "elapsed_seconds": 2.5, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "APPEARANCES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 281.52, + 413.09999999999997 + ], + [ + 371.562744140625, + 413.09999999999997 + ], + [ + 371.562744140625, + 427.08416748046875 + ], + [ + 281.52, + 427.08416748046875 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 45 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 19 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 104 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 33 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 104 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 32 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 32 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 104 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 33 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 110 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 28 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 27 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 31 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 104 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 29 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 104 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 28 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 29 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 104 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 36 + ], + [ + "Text", + 26 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02845805" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845820/EFTA02845820.md b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845820/EFTA02845820.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..24d74121fb50520b358c16c11b12ededf9fc2733 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845820/EFTA02845820.md @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@ +## IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK + +UNITED STATES OF AM + +USA / Plaintiff(s) + +Case No.: 19CR830 + +TOVA NOEL ET AL., + +Defendant(s) + +## NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT + +Notice is hereby given that an official transcript of a has been filed by the court reporter/transcriber in the above-captioned matter. + +)NFEREN( held on 11/25/19 + +Redaction responsibilities apply to the attorneys of record or pro se parties, even if the person requesting the transcript is a judge or a member of the public or media. + +The parties have seven (7) calendar days from the date of filing of this NOTICE to file with the court any NOTICE OF INTENT TO REQUEST REDACTION of this transcript. A copy of said NOTICE must also be served on the court reporter. If no such NOTICE is filed, the transcript may be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after ninety (90) calendar days. + +This process may only be used to redact the following personal data identifiers: Social Security numbers; dates of birth; minors' names; and financial account numbers. See Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2, and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 49.1. Parties wishing to request redaction of other information may proceed by motion. + +I (we) certify that the foregoing is a correct transcript from the record of proceedings in the aboveentitled matter. + +/S CAROL GANI + +( 'OuI t Reporter/Transcriber Date \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845820/EFTA02845820.metadata.json b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845820/EFTA02845820.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..76ee8aa5877e811f8af555b8f45d57d70aa4b165 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845820/EFTA02845820.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,109 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845820.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1440, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.88, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nFOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 154.224, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 418.669189453125, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 418.669189453125, + 96.363037109375 + ], + [ + 154.224, + 96.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 168.3, + 307.79999999999995 + ], + [ + 448.919921875, + 307.79999999999995 + ], + [ + 448.919921875, + 322.4830627441406 + ], + [ + 168.3, + 322.4830627441406 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02845820" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845821/EFTA02845821.md b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845821/EFTA02845821.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..aeac52c96782b3f66a85c97f4dfac9907b84f148 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845821/EFTA02845821.md @@ -0,0 +1,53 @@ +## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT + +for the + +Southern District of New York + +United States + +Plaintiff + +) ) + +v. ) Case No. 19 Cr 830 (AT) + +Tova Noel & Michael ) + +Defendant ) + +## APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL + +To: The clerk of court and all parties of record + +I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for: + +the United States + +Date: 01/24/2020 + +Attorney's signature + +Jessica Lonergan + +Printed name and bar number + +U.S. Attorney's Office, SDNY + +One St. Andrew's Plaza + +New York, New York 10007 + +Address + +jessica.lonergan@usdoj.gov + +E-mail address + +(212) 637-1038 + +Telephone number + +(212) 637-2615 + +FAX number \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845821/EFTA02845821.metadata.json b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845821/EFTA02845821.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ddbd566c7032714f245d8a14734ccafa38da0b55 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845821/EFTA02845821.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,109 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845821.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 653, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.38, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 168.912, + 56.7 + ], + [ + 443.71270751953125, + 56.7 + ], + [ + 443.71270751953125, + 78.1688232421875 + ], + [ + 168.912, + 78.1688232421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 227.66400000000002, + 210.60000000000002 + ], + [ + 383.3016357421875, + 210.60000000000002 + ], + [ + 383.3016357421875, + 223.60406494140625 + ], + [ + 227.66400000000002, + 223.60406494140625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 27 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02845821" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845822/EFTA02845822.md b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845822/EFTA02845822.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..02deb907a6c7b6b7f523e2bcddd5807ab765a92e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845822/EFTA02845822.md @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@ +![](_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg) + +Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT Document 20 Filed 01/27/20 Page 1 of 2 gigi, FOY& SEPLOWITZE a t t o r n ey s a t l a w + +105 MAIN STREET HACKENSACK. NJ 07601 TEL: 201-457-0071 FAX: 201-457-0072 + +## FILED VIA ECF + +WWW.FOYSEPLOWITZ.COM + +January 27, 2020 + +Honorable Analisa United States District Court Judge Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 + +> Re: US v. Tova Noel. et al Docket # 19 cr. 830 (AT) Request to Adjourn Trial Date + +Dear Judge + +30 WALL STREET 8TH FLOOR NEW YORK. NY 10005 TEL 212-709-8230 + +On November 25, 2019, during the initial status conference the Court scheduled the above referenced criminal action for trial to commence on April 20, 2020. I am requesting that the trial date be postponed to sometime in October or a date thereafter that is convenient for the Court. + +The adjournment is necessary to ensure that Ms. Noel receives adequate and effective assistance of counsel. The postponement of the trial will allow for the defense to review voluminous discovery and conduct a defense investigation of the case. + +On November 22, 2019, I informed the Government that I would provide them with a hard drive during the November 25, 2019 initial status conference. On November 25, 2019, I provided the Government with a hard drive for discovery and the Government informed the Court that they would produce discovery in 30 days. The Government forwarded discovery on the hard drive to my office on December 31, 2019. The discovery was received by my office on January 2, 2020. On January 4, 2020, I attempted to review the discovery and I could not access it because the Government provided the incorrect password to get access. On January 6, 2020, I was provided with the correct password and gained my first access to the discovery. + +The discovery contained in the initialproduction is 877GB of materials. The 877GB of materials contains up to 8118 of global discovery and up to 20,853 of individual discovery. In folder marked SDNY 00000001, there is video surveillance capturing 3 separate cameras from July 5, 2019 thru August 12, 2019. Each date allegedly contains the 24-hour period for each day, from each camera, and in 1-hour increments per individual file. Note, that there is video surveillance in the Government's possession that has not been turned over, however, the Government + +PAGE 2 + +indicated that those video surveillance files will be turned over upon request. Furthermore, SDNY\_7549.8118 contains the interviews of approximately 29 employees and 14 inmates. It will be necessary to interview many, if not all the witnesses previously interviewed by the Government. + +A review of the video surveillance turned over reveals that most of the videos are not date or time stamped. After discussions with the Government, on January 21, 2020, I provided the Government with a flash drive to reproduce the same video surveillance contained in SDNY\_00000001 with the date and time stamps. On January 22, 2020, the Government received the flash drive and advised my office that the flash drive was not functioning properly. On January 23, 2020, I forwarded a 1TB hard drive to the Government to provide the requested materials. Based upon representations made by the Government, I expect to receive the hard drive back by January 27, 2020. + +On January 24, 2020, my office received additional discs from the Government. The additional discovery increased the global discovery number to 8132. + +Based upon the volume of discovery received to date, defendant Noel is not able to determine what motions or legal issues she will raise. I anticipate making additional requests for discovery or information, however, I will need significant time to review and digest the discovery to have an appreciation of what materials we do have and what materials we do not have that we are entitled to. + +I will be prepared to discuss this issue in further detail during our upcoming status conference on January 30, 2020 at 11:00am. Thank you for your thoughtful consideration. + +Sincerely, + +FOY & SEPLOWITZ LLC + +gadetAl e Zet + +JASON E. FOY irovoiovsepiowtsz.com + +end. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845822/EFTA02845822.metadata.json b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845822/EFTA02845822.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..eb1ceb7dc5e899e1842b55ed4ec87d04bdddd473 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845822/EFTA02845822.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,126 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845822.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 4127, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.85, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "FILED VIA ECF", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 177.39000000000001 + ], + [ + 168.58306884765625, + 177.39000000000001 + ], + [ + 168.58306884765625, + 192.99200439453125 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 192.99200439453125 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 112 + ], + [ + "Line", + 47 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02845822" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845822/_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845822/_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d104c2e23c3392c2d528fd0a1550877178232430 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845822/_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:923779c0fd578e090ef902e1e502a68ebd6eab1ffa499810c24e16286cb4fb69 +size 2961 diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845824/EFTA02845824.md b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845824/EFTA02845824.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4837e0372b23715683f14ecd4b10b32b3bb56b8e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845824/EFTA02845824.md @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@ +![](_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg) + +# The Law Offices of MONTELL FIGGINS,LLC + +17 Academy Street. Suite 305 Newark, New Jersey 07102 Phone: (973) 242-4700 Fax: (973) 242-4701 www.figginslaw.com BRANCH OFFICES: + +140 East Ridgewood Avenue Paramus, NJ 07640 + +Reply to Newark Office [X] + +ASSOCIATES Kenneth E. M, Esq. Linda Childs. Esq. + +### SENT VIA ECF + +Honorable Analisa U.S. Southern District of NY 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 + +30 Wall Street 8" Floor New York. NY 1005 + +January 27, 2020 + +Re: State of NY v Michael et al. Docket No.: 1:19-cr-00830 Adjournment Request + +Dear Hon. Judge + +Pursuant to the Court's request, I am making a written request that the April 20, 2020 trial date be adjourned for at least 6 months. Firstly, the government in this matter sent out discovery on or about December 31, 2019. It was received in my office over the holiday break when no one was working. Thereafter, there was an issue with me being able to access the drive containing all of the information proffered by the government because we were given the wrong password by the government. Accordingly, I have had only about two weeks to review the voluminous discovery provided. + +The discovery ostensibly contains approximately 25,000 documents and hundreds of hours of video footage. In order to effectively represent my client, I will need at least an additional 60 days to review the discovery and discuss it with my client. Thereafter, I will still need to conduct an investigation based on the information and witness statements detailed in the discovery. Such an undertaking will take at the minimum another 60 days. As the Court can see, it will take me 90 days or more before I am in a position to know what additional discovery may be needed or what motions are appropriate. Additionally, this timeline doesn't even account for issues regarding subpoenas, requests for additional discovery and attempting to locate witnesses or hire experts. + +![](_page_1_Picture_1.jpeg) + +# The Law Offices of MONTELL FIGGINS,LLC + +17 Academy Street. Suite 305 Newark, New Jersey 07102 Phone: (973) 242-4700 Fax: (973) 242-4701 www.tigginslaw.com + +BRANCH OFFICES: + +140 East Ridgewood Avenue Paramus. NJ 07640 + +#### Reply to Newark Office pq + +#### ASSOC1AT + +Kenneth E. Esq. Linda Childs. sq. + +30 Wall Street fr Floor New York. NY 1005 + +As previously noted, I intend on filing a motion for dismissal based on selective prosecution. If successful, this motion will entitle my client to additional discovery beyond what has previously been provided which also pushes the trial timeline beyond April of 2020. + +My client's position is also that we are entitled to any and all reports, memorandums, witness statements and investigative reports written, produced or possessed by the inspector general regarding this incident and the Federal Bureau of Prison's policy regarding written statements and employee conduct. + +It should be noted, that it took the justice department, the FBI, the inspector general's office and an assortment of other federal agencies more than 90 days to investigate this matter. Accordingly, it is more than reasonable that it would take the defendant and his counsel, who have less than one percent of the man power and resources of the government, a significantly longer time to accomplish an adequate investigation and review of all the necessary information provided in this case. + +Respectfully yours, + +/s/ Montell Figgins + +Montell Figgins, Esq. + +Attorney for Defendant Michael + +cc: Nicolas Roos, Esq., Counsel for Plaintiff Rebekah Donaleski, Esq., Counsel for Plaintif Jessica Lonergan, Esq., Counsel for Plaintiff Jason Erroy Foy, Esq, Counsel for Defendant Noel \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845824/EFTA02845824.metadata.json b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845824/EFTA02845824.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9f94496be90f3130482da36fac84eb35504b8023 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845824/EFTA02845824.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,227 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845824.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 3668, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.03, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg", + "_page_1_Picture_1.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "The Law Offices of \nMONTELL FIGGINS,LLC", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 157.28400000000002, + 46.496826171875 + ], + [ + 514.0799999999999, + 46.496826171875 + ], + [ + 514.0799999999999, + 100.88702392578125 + ], + [ + 157.28400000000002, + 100.88702392578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SENT VIA ECF", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 294.84000000000003 + ], + [ + 158.62139892578125, + 294.84000000000003 + ], + [ + 158.62139892578125, + 310.1030578613281 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 310.1030578613281 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "The Law Offices of \nMONTELL FIGGINS,LLC", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 157.28400000000002, + 46.496826171875 + ], + [ + 514.0799999999999, + 46.496826171875 + ], + [ + 514.0799999999999, + 100.88702392578125 + ], + [ + 157.28400000000002, + 100.88702392578125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Reply to Newark Office pq", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 190.42889404296875 + ], + [ + 186.76358032226562, + 190.42889404296875 + ], + [ + 186.76358032226562, + 204.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 204.7330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ASSOC1AT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 220.32000000000005 + ], + [ + 123.62400000000002, + 220.32000000000005 + ], + [ + 123.62400000000002, + 231.36590576171875 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 231.36590576171875 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 89 + ], + [ + "Line", + 45 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 84 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02845824" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845824/_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845824/_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0f4d756dea5414f20e61e9e1cd3f213886cc9b92 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845824/_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:17cdb356c2bc952ea1d0d58efb043393bc8a679139f63d94422f2b9531e3f13b +size 3646 diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845824/_page_1_Picture_1.jpeg b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845824/_page_1_Picture_1.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8bae61917eb5774dfe745bb343fad205aae79c28 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845824/_page_1_Picture_1.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:2d9783d8a1ca54dadb14cd2bcde553ccca88bd73ee84c55b93ffa2db475579f2 +size 3513 diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845826/EFTA02845826.md b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845826/EFTA02845826.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..2d5c917549b49b256aec75488fc5340cc4f6af36 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845826/EFTA02845826.md @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@ +![](_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg) + +United States Attorney Southern District of New York + +The Silvio J. Mollo Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York. New York 10007 + +January 28, 2020 + +## BY ECF + +The Honorable Analisa United States District Judge Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, New York 10007 + +> Re: United States v. Noel and 19 Cr. 830 (AT) + +Dear Judge + +The Government respectfully writes in response to the defendants' letters of January 27, 2020, requesting at least a six-month adjournment of the trial date in the above-captioned case, which is currently scheduled to commence on April 20, 2020. The Government remains prepared to proceed to trial as scheduled. As is set forth more fully below, while the Government has no objection to a brief adjournment of the trial date subject to the Court's availability, the requested six-month adjournment is both unnecessary and unwarranted. + +By way of background, as is set forth in the Indictment, the charges in this case relate to a period of just over 14 hours-from approximately 4:00 p.m. on August 9, 2019 to approximately 6:30 a.m. the following day, August 10, 2019. The Government has made three discovery productions—(1) the main production on December 31, 2019; (2) a small supplemental production on January 23, 2020; and (3) a reproduction of video surveillance footage with timestamps on January 24, 2020. i While the December 31, 2019 discovery production consisted of a large number of pages of materials, many of those materials were produced principally in anticipation of defense requests and to help facilitate the very sort of broader investigation the defendants now claim they need to undertake. For example, the Government produced MCC video surveillance for a period of longer than one month (July 5, 2019 to August 12, 2019); count slips for nearly three weeks (July 23, 2019 to August 14, 2019); thirty-minute round reports for more than a month (July 1, 2019 to August 10, 2019); and materials relating to the events of July 23, 2019. Similarly, with respect to defendant Noel, the Government provided in discovery to her only a report from her cellphone, which consists of more than 20,000 pages, very few of which, if any, are relevant to the pending charges. For substantially the same reasons, and as the Court is aware, the + +For the third production, the Government requested additional hard drives from defense counsel. To date, only Noel's counsel provided a hard drive to the Government, which the Government then loaded and returned to counsel. The Government stands ready to do the same for as soon as a hard drive is provided. + +Government also produced 3500 material for every individual interviewed during the investigation in December, nearly four months in advance of trial. + +"Whether or not to adjourn a trial date is traditionally within the discretion of the trial judge." United States v. Scopo, 861 F.241 339, 344 (2d Cir. 1988) (internal quotations omitted). While there "is no mechanical test with respect to requests for a continuance or adjournment," United States v. Al Fawaaz, 116 F. Supp. 3d 194, 210 (S.D.N.Y. 2015), the Second Circuit has identified certain circumstances in which an adjournment may be appropriate: (I) the requested delay is of a short (or at least fixed duration); (2) the sought-after evidence is specified with particularity; (3) the proposed evidence is critical to the defense; and (4) the defendant has not been dilatory. Id. at 211 (summarizing considerations found in United States v. MB 324 F.3d 814, 814-16 (2d Cir. 1963)). + +None of the circumstances identified in Al Fawaaz necessitate the lengthy adjournment requested by the defendants. The Government's case-in-chief turns on a brief, fourteen-hour window for which the evidence is limited and now available to the defendants. Moreover, even as expanded to include all of the additional material produced as described above, the discovery in the instant case is neither unusually voluminous nor complex, and the defendants provide no specific reasons why the review of the materials requires a six-month adjournment. + +Nor does the need to file pre-trial motions and interview witnesses support such an adjournment. counsel has indicated that he intends to file a motion to dismiss the indictment, while Noel's counsel states that he has not been able to determine what motions to file pending his review of the discovery. Noel's counsel, however, identifies no reason to believe such a review is likely to result in the identification of any potential pre-trial motions: as counsel is aware, the Government did not obtain any search warrants as part of its investigation, nor did the defendants make post-arrest statements that the Government would seek to introduce into evidence. As such, there is no evidence for the defendants to seek to suppress. As for the motion to dismiss, which does not depend on a review of the discovery, counsel for identifies no reason why such a motion could not be made in short order. + +Finally, with respect to the need to interview witnesses, as noted above, the Government has already produced all of the witness statements in its possession, almost all of them on December 31, 2019, nearly four months before trial. As the Court is well-aware, such productions of witness statements are typically made only weeks before trial is scheduled to begin. As such, the Government's early production of those materials—giving the defendants months of additional time to review those statements and take any potential investigation steps based upon them cannot possibly merit a lengthy postponement of the trial date. + +Accordingly, as noted above, the Government is prepared to proceed to trial as scheduled. That said, while the Government would not object to a short adjournment of the trial date to provide the defendants with additional time to prepare, the issues identified in the defendants' letters do not require a six-month adjournment. + +Respectfully submitted, + +GEOFFREY S. BERMAN United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York + +By: /s/ + +Rebekah Donaleski Nicolas Roos Jessica Lonergan Assistant United States Attorneys (212) 637-2423/2421/1038 + +cc: Defense Counsel (by ECF) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845826/EFTA02845826.metadata.json b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845826/EFTA02845826.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b65537493d216bf19f509666061199a390f5d1ba --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845826/EFTA02845826.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,187 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845826.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 6236, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.83, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "U.S. Department of Justice", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 318.24, + 25.92 + ], + [ + 464.32379150390625, + 25.92 + ], + [ + 464.32379150390625, + 40.56353759765625 + ], + [ + 318.24, + 40.56353759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "BY ECF", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 179.82 + ], + [ + 118.97271728515625, + 179.82 + ], + [ + 118.97271728515625, + 194.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 194.2330322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 90 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 75 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 39 + ], + [ + "Line", + 19 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02845826" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845826/_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845826/_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..965ec6e1f8a3c2dc43df57bca1e3ba66dded5754 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845826/_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:813b702d83614891c5c83460b380797ee27418204f7568d9f56e4971a882bf4a +size 2991 diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845829/EFTA02845829.md b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845829/EFTA02845829.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bd793197642b10e24ef92d697c996fcbc6cef5da --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845829/EFTA02845829.md @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, + +-against- + +TOVA NOEL and MICHAEL + +Defendants. + +ANALISA District Judge: + +USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: 1/30/2020 + +19 Cr. 830 (AT) + +## 12.11111a + +At the status conference held on January 30, 2020, Defendant Michael informed the Court of his intention to file a motion to dismiss. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that: + +- (1) By March 20, 2020, Mr. shall file his motion to dismiss; +- (2) By April 10, 2020, the Government shall file its opposition; +- (3) By April 24, 2020, Mr. shall file his reply, if any. + +SO ORDERED. + +Dated: January 30, 2020 New York, New York + +ANALISA United States District Judge \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845829/EFTA02845829.metadata.json b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845829/EFTA02845829.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4a96735080d98c6377b1b532bd499c14736ccbcc --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845829/EFTA02845829.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,94 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845829.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 717, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.7, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "12.11111a", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 430.23599999999993, + 198.45000000000002 + ], + [ + 482.65283203125, + 198.45000000000002 + ], + [ + 482.65283203125, + 216.7598876953125 + ], + [ + 430.23599999999993, + 216.7598876953125 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 50 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02845829" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845830/EFTA02845830.md b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845830/EFTA02845830.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7e1d6011ba67c3af8693ec21d3c1ea7d848cc762 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845830/EFTA02845830.md @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ +UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, + +-against- + +TOVA NOEL and MICHAEL + +Defendants. + +ANALISA District Judge: + +USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: 1/30/2020 + +19 Cr. 830 (AT) + +## ORDER + +For reasons stated on the record at the status conference held on January 30, 2020, Defendants' motions to adjourn the trial date, ECF Nos. 20 and 21, are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The trial in this matter scheduled for April 20, 2020, is hereby ADJOURNED to June 22, 2020. Trial shall commence at 9:00 a.m. on June 22, 2020. + +The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motions at ECF Nos. 20 and 21. + +SO ORDERED. + +Dated: January 30, 2020 New York, New York + +ANALISA United States District Judge \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845830/EFTA02845830.metadata.json b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845830/EFTA02845830.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d3c1e64c8610ba81ffa3c91733935691e99018d3 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845830/EFTA02845830.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845830.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 765, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.71, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "ORDER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 430.23599999999993, + 196.5703125 + ], + [ + 482.71630859375, + 196.5703125 + ], + [ + 482.71630859375, + 214.7713623046875 + ], + [ + 430.23599999999993, + 214.7713623046875 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 50 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02845830" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845831/EFTA02845831.md b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845831/EFTA02845831.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a56361a90321df844f3efb852d90ecd1911a7d26 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845831/EFTA02845831.md @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ +## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT + +for the + +Southern District of New York + +![](_page_0_Picture_132.jpeg) + +United States + +*Plaintiff* + +v. + +Tova Noel + +*Defendant* + +) +) +) +) +) + +Case No. 1:19-CR-00830-AT + +### APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL + +To: The clerk of court and all parties of record + +I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as counsel for: + +Tova Noel + +Date: 02/02/2020 + +![]()*Attorney & Signature* + +Eric J. Sarraga ES6095 +*Printed name and bar number* + +Foy & Seplowitz +105 Main Street +Hackensack, NJ 07601 + +*Address* + +esarraga@foyseplowitz.com +*E-mail address* + +(201) 457-0071 +*Telephone number* + +(201) 457-0072 +*FAX number* \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845831/EFTA02845831.metadata.json b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845831/EFTA02845831.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3badab59710ec94612cc4b42ebd9edb00ac9fbee --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845831/EFTA02845831.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,115 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845831.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 686, + "elapsed_seconds": 5.14, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_0_Picture_132.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 182.37599999999998, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 438.192, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 438.192, + 89.1 + ], + [ + 182.37599999999998, + 89.1 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 236.84400000000002, + 213.84 + ], + [ + 381.88800000000003, + 213.84 + ], + [ + 381.88800000000003, + 225.18 + ], + [ + 236.84400000000002, + 225.18 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Text", + 48 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02845831" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845831/_page_0_Picture_132.jpeg b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845831/_page_0_Picture_132.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ad7a1eb7ba9965c1b1889c3bac7ed20397b246dd --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845831/_page_0_Picture_132.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:f28b2df747ae3e9bfef68edabecd89ff9950da973fef0bae80c7544a09870ad4 +size 1044 diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845832/EFTA02845832.md b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845832/EFTA02845832.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..53926a2d55586565148acf5be9f026824f14e9e1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845832/EFTA02845832.md @@ -0,0 +1,565 @@ +UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, New York, N.Y. + +> v. 19 Cr. 830(AT) + +TOVA NOEL and MICHAEL + +Defendant. + +x Conference January 30, 2020 11:00 a.m. + +Before: + +HON. ANALISA + +District Judge + +APPEARANCES + +GEOFFREY S. BERMAN United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York BY: JESSICA R. LONERGAN NICOLAS T. LANDSMAN-ROOS REBEKAH A. DONALESKI Assistant United States Attorneys + +FOY & SEPLOWITZ, LLC Attorney for Defendant Noel BY: JASON E. FOY ERIC SAGARRA + +LAW OFFICES OF MONTELL FIGGINS Attorney for Defendant • BY: MONTELL FIGGINS + +4 Would you make your appearance, please. + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 9 10 11 MR. FOY: May it please the court, your Honor, Jason Foy, for Ms. Tova Noel, standing to my right. Also with me at counsel table is associate counsel Eric Sagara. Good morning, your Honor. + +12 MR. SAGARA: Good morning, your Honor. + +13 14 15 MR. FIGGINS: Good morning your Honor. Montell Figgins on behalf of Michael , representing my client, who stands to my right. + +16 17 18 THE COURT: I understand that the defense is requesting that I adjourn the trial because of the volume of discovery. I will hear you on that. + +19 20 21 22 23 24 25 MR. FOY: Yes, your Honor. We are asking that the trial date of April 20, 2020, be moved to sometime in October or a date thereafter that's convenient to the court. The reason for the request is because it is necessary in order to provide an adequate and effective assistance of counsel. Why? Yes, because of the voluminous discovery. But also because of the amount of time it is going to take for us to conduct our + +(Case called) + +THE COURT: Good morning. We are here in the matter of the United States v. Tova Noel and Michael + +MS. LONERGAN: For the government, Jessica Lonergan. With me at counsel table are my colleagues Nicholas Roos and Rebekah Donaleski. Good morning, your Honor. + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +own investigation, which can't really fully get started until we appreciate what information has already been provided. That's really the crux of the reason. + +Now, I noted in the government's opposition, although they agree that some adjournment is warranted, I guess the issue is of how long the adjournment should be. The defense is in the best position to assess how much time we need to perform our important function on behalf of our clients. I say that because we are not making a request for the purpose of simply delaying the proceedings. We are doing it because it is actually necessary to accomplish our goals as counsel. + +Also, which I did not reference in my letter, is it also takes into account my trial schedule, at least why my request was. Last week, I was scheduled to start a trial before Judge Ramos in 40 Foley Square in July. And part of what I discussed with Judge Ramos in setting that trial date was that I knew that this trial may need to be accommodated in some way. He selected July 20 for that date mostly because of the court's availability at that time. That's also part of the reason. And in that particular case, my client's been incarcerated for almost two years. He is facing a mandatory life sentence. So I do need to spend some of my time getting ready for that as well, and I expect that to be our trial date. + +THE COURT: What's the date? + +MR. FOY: What's the date? + +4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 So really it's so we can perform our functions, and of course there are other things going on as far as responsibilities, and that would give us sufficient time to be ready. It is not an unreasonable request. To say a case that started on November 19, 2019, to be tried in less than a year I don't think is an unusual circumstance. I don't think anyone can say it is delayed justice. My client, who is free, she is not incarcerated, so we don't have any of the interests of an incarcerated defendant who wants to get a speedy trial. It is necessary, not an option, not just something we just feel like. This isn't about us laying back, taking our time. It's about doing a diligent job. In order to do that, we do need the time, and I would ask that you grant the request. + +16 THE COURT: How long is the Judge Ramos trial? + +17 18 MR. FOY: The government represented that they expect it to be about two weeks. + +19 THE COURT: Starting on July 20 you said, yes? + +20 MR. FOY: That's correct. + +21 22 23 24 25 MR. FIGGINS: Your Honor, I also join in the motion. The court has had a chance to read my letter with respect to requesting an adjournment. It is very early for us at this point even to have a full appreciation as to what's going to happen in this matter. I have only had the discovery for + +THE COURT: In July. + +MR. FOY: July 20 for that trial. + +approximately two weeks. It's going to take -- I think there was at least 25 witness statements that we not only need to review, but then we need to try and follow up and maybe contact those witnesses. There are some people who were incarcerated, may have been released. There are numerous things that must be done in terms of at least us tracking down specific details that our clients are demanding that we do in their defense. + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +It took the federal government 90 days to investigate this case and to come up with an indictment. Accordingly, a law firm with one or two attorneys, without the resources of all the federal agencies, it is going to take us more than 90 days to do the same amount of work. So I don't think that it is an unreasonable request. + +Not to mention, I believe that if the court were not to grant some type of an adjournment, we are going to find ourselves back here again, but the defense will just be in a better position to give you more specifics as to why we need more time A la maybe we can't track down this witness or we spoke to this witness and now we have to find another one. There are numerous things like that that I think would come about, and that's why we would try and suggest to give the court a bird's eye view of that early on, so that maybe we can delay -- or avoid having to come back repeatedly just to make those additional requests. + +Additionally, your Honor, I do believe that there is a + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +high likelihood that I'm going to file a motion to dismiss the indictment based on selective prosecution. I do believe that if certain portions of that motion are granted, then that's going to entitle the defense to additional discovery that we haven't even received yet. + +So with the request that we are asking for, we are also having an opportunity to kind of see -- I know kind of the things that are going to happen or potentially will happen, so instead of just trying to come back here three or four times to say this is happening, we can kind of just do this now and realize that that motion will probably be filed. That may create other issues with respect to discovery. + +Also, your Honor, I have also made a specific request under Rule 16 that the defense wants whatever investigation was done and whatever information with respect to the Inspector position that we are entitled there is that is discoverable General's report. It is my to that information. It is an investigation of the same incident. It is an investigation of the circumstances with which my client is being charged. With that being said, I do think that we are entitled to whatever information was generated in those reports, so I believe that also is going to cause a delay in the trial wherever we go with that issue. + +THE COURT: We already addressed that the last time. + +(Pause) + +4 5 MS. LONERGAN: Yes, your Honor. As we put in our written submission to the court, we agree that a brief adjournment is appropriate, but we do not think that a six-month adjournment is necessary or warranted. + +6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 First, the amount of discovery in this case is not particularly voluminous nor complex in light of the cases tried in this district; and, in addition, the further investigation, I want to focus the court on the facts that are going to be at issue in this trial occurred over a 14-hour period. It is true that, as part of our discovery, we provided information outside of that 14-hour period, anticipating many of the types of requests that the defense counsel has already begun to make. But again, your Honor, this is a very focused, single-incident indictment that is about what happened over the period of 14 hours. A much larger investigation about, for example, the working conditions at the MCC, it is just not relevant to what is going to be the issues on trial here. + +19 20 21 22 23 24 25 I want to also touch on something that plaintiff said about the need to interview witnesses. As we explained to the court, we have done something that's unusual here, which is that we have provided witness statements with our initial discovery almost four months in advance of trial. As the court is aware, we typically provide what we call 3500 material much closer to trial. So the need to review those witness + +THE COURT: I will hear from the government. + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +statements and interview additional -- interview those witnesses, that can't possibly weigh in favor of an adjournment when in fact the defense counsel has so much more time with those materials than they would in a typical trial schedule where they might have those materials just a few weeks before trial, your Honor. + +So for those reasons, we think that we are hard pressed to identify areas of additional investigation that would touch on the 14-hour time period that is going to be at issue in this trial; and so, for those reasons, while we agree that a short adjournment is warranted, that six months is not required. We do understand of course that that may be difficult with Mr. Foy's trial schedule with having the July trial, but it seems like there may be a possibility of putting this trial before Mr. Foy's July trial and still giving him sufficient time to prepare for both. + +THE COURT: And how long do you expect this trial to go? + +MS. LONERGAN: Your Honor, if this trial is confined to that 14-hour time period, setting aside jury selection, I can't imagine it lasting more than a week. + +THE COURT: Okay. The trial is set for June 8. + +With respect to the motion to dismiss, the motion is due on March 9, opposition is due by April 6, and the reply is due on April 20. + +Are there any further applications? + +MR. FIGGINS: Yes, your Honor. You said we dealt with 4 5 6 the issue with respect to the Investigator General's report. This court has never addressed it at all. You never said anything with respect to that. So I just want to make that clear. Do I need to file a motion with respect to that? + +7 THE COURT: You may file a formal motion. + +8 MR. FIGGINS: Thank you. + +9 THE COURT: Anything further? + +10 11 12 13 14 15 16 MR. FIGGINS: Your Honor, can I have an additional two weeks? Can we push the motion schedule back at least an additional two weeks? Because I have my 80-something-year-old relative coming to visit me from February 23 through March 1, so I kind of won't be working during that time. So if you could just make it like -- if you could make it something around like the 18th or the 21st. + +17 18 THE COURT: All right, then. You can file your motion by March 20. + +19 How long does the prosecution need to oppose? + +20 MS. LONERGAN: Your Honor, three weeks, please. + +21 22 THE COURT: So the prosecution will file opposition on April 10, and the reply will be April 24. + +23 Is there anything further? + +24 25 MS. LONERGAN: Yes, your Honor, at this time the government moves to exclude time between now and the trial + +date, which has now been set for June 8, for the following reasons: + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +It will allow the parties to discuss potential pretrial dispositions, to allow defense counsel to review the discovery, make and file motions, the court to resolve those motions, and for the defense counsel to conduct the additional discovery that they have been discussing today in court. + +MR. FOY: Your Honor, I don't oppose the government's position. + +I wanted to just go back to one thing. I understand you have ruled. I accept that it is June 8. Hopefully there are no delays because I anticipate being out of the country - we haven't set a specific date, but I'm traveling with family at the end of June. So if there is any delay, that could be an issue. + +THE COURT: You are talking about leisure travel? + +MR. FOY: Well, leisure. My family, first-priority travel. That's what it is. So I don't know if it's just leisure. It is not business, but it is the business of having family business. + +THE COURT: Well, you should work your family schedule around your professional obligations, counsel. + +MR. FOY: Well, if there is a delay in the professional schedule of trial, because it is not unusual for sometimes there to be delays, because if we start a week later + +4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 MR. FOY: Okay. Here is the issue. The government has represented to you that this is just about a 14-hour period. I suspect that, when the trial comes around, that the only thing that won't come up during the trial is the 14-hour period, right? Because it's not as if we are not here because of other things having nothing to do with the defendants in this case, and the working conditions at MCC are directly related to why things happened in that 14-hour period. The years of conduct, the culture of the institution, the failures in security measures beyond counts. + +14 15 16 17 We have been provided with three videos of the 192 that exist. In the SHU there are nine video cameras. Only one has been produced, and it shows almost nothing. And why that is, the circumstances, what it means, is relevant. + +18 19 20 21 22 So maybe it will be a one-week trial. That's possible. But what I am trying to avoid is some type of conflict that we can see now that -- you know, because, you know, I understand professional obligations, but if I had to choose between family and my professional obligations, it's -- + +23 24 THE COURT: All right. Well, counsel, I am directing that you be here on June 8 to start trial. + +25 MR. FOY: I will be here. + +for some reason, then it's going to create a conflict. + +THE COURT: You will not be starting a week later. We are starting on the 8th of June. + +4 MR. FIGGINS: Your Honor -- sorry to cut you off. + +5 6 7 8 Your Honor, I'm thankful Mr. Foy said that about the family vacation. I am actually going to be in Italy on a cruise June 1 through June 14. We fly back on the 15th of June. + +9 THE COURT: And you just forgot about it? + +10 11 12 13 MR. FIGGINS: Your Honor, I don't keep my social calendar. Luckily he said that and I realized that in June we do have a cruise scheduled, and I didn't even know the date, so I had to find out just now. + +14 THE COURT: When do you return? + +15 16 MR. FIGGINS: The 15th, and I don't even know what day of the week that is, but . . . + +17 THE COURT: We will start on the 22nd of June. + +18 19 20 MR. FOY: Well, Judge, that's the time I was just talking to you about. Right? That I'm trying to make arrangements to travel with my family. Right? + +21 22 23 24 THE COURT: Well, I understand that it is desirable to have family time, but you also have an obligation to zealously represent your client, and so we are going to start on the 22nd. + +25 MR. FOY: So I don't understand. I mean, I have no + +THE COURT: That is my order. + +MR. FOY: And I will be here. I just don't want there to be any delay that creates that issue. + +4 + +5 + +6 + +7 + +8 + +9 + +10 + +11 + +12 + +13 + +14 + +15 + +16 + +17 + +18 + +19 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +problem zealously representing my client, and I will do so. If my daughter is going to be in Italy, ironically, and my wife and my other daughter are going to travel there at the end of her program so we can spend time, how is that an issue for us to take that into consideration in a professional setting? Like, I don't understand. + +THE COURT: Counsel, you will use Skype. Is there anything -- + +MR. FOY: No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no. + +THE COURT: Is there anything further? + +MR. FOY: I'm not going to use -- + +THE COURT: Counsel, I have heard enough. Is there anything further? + +MR. FOY: Well, look, I'm not -- + +THE COURT: Sit down, counsel. + +MR. FOY: Can I be heard? + +THE COURT: You will sit down. + +MR. FOY: And then be heard from the seat? + +THE COURT: No. You will sit down. + +Is there anything further unrelated to the vacation plans -- + +MR. FOY: This is not just vacation, your Honor. + +THE COURT: Counsel, I have had it. Now, you sit down and stop -- + +MR. FOY: Before -- + +4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 THE COURT: -- with this nonsense. MR. FOY: Before I sit down, your Honor -- THE COURT: No. MR. FOY: -- you said June 8. THE COURT: Counsel, I have directed -- MR. FOY: My co counsel -- THE COURT: -- you to sit down. MR. FOY: My co-counsel says -- THE COURT: Sit down, counsel. MR. FOY: -- he has vacation and THE COURT: Sit down. MR. FOY: -- we are going to interrupt -- THE COURT: Sit down. MR. FOY: -- my family -- THE COURT: Counsel. MR. FOY: -- obligations -- THE COURT: Counsel. MR. FOY: -- for a nonviolent -- THE COURT: Sit down, counsel. MR. FOY: -- criminal case with no mandatory jail -- THE COURT: Counsel, sit down. MR. FOY: -- that's not even THE COURT: Sit down. MR. FOY: -- based on their conduct? THE COURT: Sit down. + +4 5 MR. FOY: No. I'm not -- there is no jury here. I'm trying to address the unfairness -- + +6 THE COURT: Sit down. + +7 8 MR. FOY: -- of proper consideration of a professional -- + +9 10 THE COURT: You are trying my patience, counsel. Sit down. + +11 All right, then. The matter is adjourned. + +12 13 14 15 MS. LONERGAN: Your Honor, sorry. We are going to amend our application to exclude time now until June 22, which is the date the court has now set for trial for the reasons we previously stated on the record. + +16 17 18 THE COURT: The matter is adjourned until June 22. The time is excluded under the Speedy Trial Act for the reasons already stated by the prosecution. + +19 000 + +20 + +21 + +22 + +23 + +24 + +25 + +MR. FOY: It's based on what some other man did? + +THE COURT: Counsel, you don't have a jury here. Stop performing. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845832/EFTA02845832.metadata.json b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845832/EFTA02845832.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4f8ad9e43d01ad7a76ce1353a5991ca19de6a45e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845832/EFTA02845832.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,534 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845832.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 15, + "chars": 18521, + "elapsed_seconds": 2.41, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 113 + ], + [ + "Line", + 57 + ], + [ + "Text", + 36 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 28 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 104 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 27 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 55 + ], + [ + "Text", + 28 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 29 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 30 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 104 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 104 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 103 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "Text", + 39 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 52 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 5 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 93 + ], + [ + "Line", + 46 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02845832" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845847/EFTA02845847.md b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845847/EFTA02845847.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0651e62b9084b6dbad4d815fcd9fd27e7e5d7c3c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845847/EFTA02845847.md @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@ +## IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK + +UNITED STATES OF AM + +USA / Plaintiff(s) + +Case No.: 19CR830 + +TOVA NOEL ET AL., + +Defendant(s) + +## NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT + +Notice is hereby given that an official transcript of a has been filed by the court reporter/transcriber in the above-captioned matter. + +)NFEREN( held on 1/30/2020 + +Redaction responsibilities apply to the attorneys of record or pro se parties, even if the person requesting the transcript is a judge or a member of the public or media. + +The parties have seven (7) calendar days from the date of filing of this NOTICE to file with the court any NOTICE OF INTENT TO REQUEST REDACTION of this transcript. A copy of said NOTICE must also be served on the court reporter. If no such NOTICE is filed, the transcript may be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after ninety (90) calendar days. + +This process may only be used to redact the following personal data identifiers: Social Security numbers; dates of birth; minors' names; and financial account numbers. See Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2, and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 49.1. Parties wishing to request redaction of other information may proceed by motion. + +I (we) certify that the foregoing is a correct transcript from the record of proceedings in the aboveentitled matter. + +/s KRISTEN CAF + +( 'OuI t Reporter/Transcriber Date \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845847/EFTA02845847.metadata.json b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845847/EFTA02845847.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3617d4cdb7b14251c38ddc014cef03c444950ffe --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845847/EFTA02845847.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,109 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845847.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1442, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.89, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nFOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 154.224, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 418.669189453125, + 66.42 + ], + [ + 418.669189453125, + 96.363037109375 + ], + [ + 154.224, + 96.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 168.3, + 307.79999999999995 + ], + [ + 448.919921875, + 307.79999999999995 + ], + [ + 448.919921875, + 322.4830627441406 + ], + [ + 168.3, + 322.4830627441406 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02845847" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845848/EFTA02845848.md b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845848/EFTA02845848.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0260e70194a5335891f17f11ca8c5aa6f1352064 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845848/EFTA02845848.md @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@ +![](_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg) + +## The Law Offices of MONTELL FIGGINS u\_c + +17 Academy Street. Suite 305 Newark New Jersey 07102 Phone: (973) 242-4700 Fax: (973) 242-4701 www.ligginslaw.com BRANCH OFFICES: + +140 East Ridgewood Avenue Paramus, NJ 07640 + +## Reply to Newark Office [X] + +## ASSOCIATu\_ + +Kenneth E. M. Esq. Linda Childs. Esq. + +## SENT VIA ECF + +Honorable Analisa U.S. Southern District of NY 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 + +30 WWI Street S. Floor New Yak, NY 1005 + +March 20, 2020 + +Re: State of NY v Michael et al. Docket No.: 1:19-cr-00830 Request Extension to File Motion + +Dear Judge + +As you are aware, our firm represents the Defendant, Michael M, in the abovecaptioned matter. Pursuant to Your Honor's Order, our firm's motion to dismiss was due today, March 20, 2020, however, we are requesting a fourteen (14) day extension in which to file our motion. Needless to say, the current events with respect to the pandemic affecting the country, has drastically affected my staffs work hours, as well as my ability to complete this motion while still managing other issues associated with my business and my family. + +In light of the foregoing, the Defendants, by and through the undersigned, respectfully requests a 14 day extension to file its motion to dismiss. + +Respectfully submitted, + +/s/ Montell Figgins + +Montell Figgins, Esq. + +Attorney for Defendant Michael + +MF/sf \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845848/EFTA02845848.metadata.json b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845848/EFTA02845848.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3858082f53cedafbeb5e1c3d7dd9981d899523dd --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845848/EFTA02845848.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,161 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845848.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1383, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.02, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "The Law Offices of \nMONTELL FIGGINS u_c", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 157.28400000000002, + 46.17 + ], + [ + 520.4044189453125, + 46.17 + ], + [ + 520.4044189453125, + 101.26702880859375 + ], + [ + 157.28400000000002, + 101.26702880859375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Reply to Newark Office [X]", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 191.16 + ], + [ + 187.3253631591797, + 191.16 + ], + [ + 187.3253631591797, + 203.61590576171875 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 203.61590576171875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ASSOCIATu_", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 219.51 + ], + [ + 135.8645782470703, + 219.51 + ], + [ + 135.8645782470703, + 230.98590087890625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 230.98590087890625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SENT VIA ECF", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 294.03 + ], + [ + 159.147705078125, + 294.03 + ], + [ + 159.147705078125, + 309.8035583496094 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 309.8035583496094 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 84 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02845848" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845848/_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845848/_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..004c2ad0eb68296705f7e92f257ce74010c9240c --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845848/_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:4455199de724be9920a8e10a2109d9cccf74683a6f7d4542f0b1173b6e4a3772 +size 3780 diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845849/EFTA02845849.md b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845849/EFTA02845849.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fb9ff28d7474d2a6f11d016890550a1194a5cd8f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845849/EFTA02845849.md @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@ +![](_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg) + +## The Law Offices of MONTELL FIGGINS u\_c + +17 Academy Street. Suite 305 Newark, New Jersey 07102 Phone: (973) 242-4700 Fax: (973) 242-4701 www.figginstaw.com BRANCH OFFICES: + +140 East Ridgewood Avenue Paramus, NJ 07640 + +## Reply to Newark Office [X] + +## ASSOCIATE + +Kenneth E Esq. Linda Childs. Esq. + +## SENT VIA ECF + +Honorable Analisa U.S. Southern District of NY 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 + +30 Wall Street 8" Floor New York, NY 1005 + +March 20, 2020 + +Re: State of NY v Michael et al. Docket No.: 1:19-cr-00830 Request Extension to File Motion + +Dear Judge + +As you are aware, our firm represents the Defendant, Michael MI, in the abovecaptioned matter. Pursuant to Your Honor's Order, our firm's motion to dismiss was due today, March 20, 2020, however, we are requesting a fourteen (14) day extension in which to file our motion. Needless to say, the current events with respect to the pandemic affecting the country, has drastically affected my staffs work hours, as well as my ability to complete this motion while still managing other issues associated with my business and my family. + +In light of the foregoing, the Defendants, by and through the undersigned, respectfully requests a 14 day extension to file its motion to dismiss. + +Respectfully submitted, + +/s/ Montell Figgins + +Montell Figgins, Esq. + +Attorney for Defendant Michael + +MF/sf \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845849/EFTA02845849.metadata.json b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845849/EFTA02845849.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c019f70d823f916fa3e0d48f9da674c3e7ab31cc --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845849/EFTA02845849.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,161 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845849.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1381, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.0, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "The Law Offices of \nMONTELL FIGGINS u_c", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 157.28400000000002, + 46.17 + ], + [ + 520.4044189453125, + 46.17 + ], + [ + 520.4044189453125, + 101.26702880859375 + ], + [ + 157.28400000000002, + 101.26702880859375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Reply to Newark Office [X]", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.932, + 191.16 + ], + [ + 187.3253631591797, + 191.16 + ], + [ + 187.3253631591797, + 203.61590576171875 + ], + [ + 67.932, + 203.61590576171875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ASSOCIATE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.932, + 219.51 + ], + [ + 123.62400000000002, + 219.51 + ], + [ + 123.62400000000002, + 231.36590576171875 + ], + [ + 67.932, + 231.36590576171875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SENT VIA ECF", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.932, + 294.03 + ], + [ + 158.6708221435547, + 294.03 + ], + [ + 158.6708221435547, + 310.10302734375 + ], + [ + 67.932, + 310.10302734375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02845849" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845849/_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845849/_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..afc94fcdc0e9a9ba3e384962b7fd9d0e9eab979e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845849/_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:12356ce21b12088f99fac3e77679574efc9466a3b11296d3c5731c09ffbca5ed +size 4008 diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845850/EFTA02845850.md b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845850/EFTA02845850.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0a5157ba4c8316c9c73b054cbe85a5f96e4149fc --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845850/EFTA02845850.md @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@ +UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, + +-against- + +TOVA NOEL and MICHAEL + +Defendants. + +USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: 3/20/2020 + +19 Cr. 830-2 (AT) + +## ORDER + +ANALISA District Judge: + +Defendant Michael a motion for an extension of the briefing schedule on his motion to dismiss, ECF No. 29, is GRANTED. It is ORDERED that the schedule is amended as follows: + +- (1) By April 3, 2020, Mr. shall file his motion to dismiss; +- (2) By April 24, 2020, the Government shall file its opposition; +- (3) By May 8, 2020, Mr. shall file his reply, if any. + +The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion at ECF No. 29. + +SO ORDERED. + +Dated: March 20, 2020 New York, New York + +ANALISA United States District Judge \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845850/EFTA02845850.metadata.json b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845850/EFTA02845850.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8d4b955291246ecde6c37fc86fc1753605ddd11e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845850/EFTA02845850.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,94 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845850.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 780, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.78, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "ORDER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 430.84799999999996, + 199.26 + ], + [ + 481.5133361816406, + 199.26 + ], + [ + 481.5133361816406, + 213.363037109375 + ], + [ + 430.84799999999996, + 213.363037109375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02845850" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845851/EFTA02845851.md b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845851/EFTA02845851.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6aaafd58520976e2cfbfc65ca6e90b98384313bb --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845851/EFTA02845851.md @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ +UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, + +-against- + +TOVA NOEL and MICHAEL + +Defendants. + +ANALISA District Judge: + +USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: 4/3/2020 + +19 Cr. 830-2 (AT) + +## ORDER + +The motion filed by Defendant Michael at ECF No. 31 contains as an attachment material that was designated by the Government as "Protected Material" pursuant to the protective order entered by the Court. ECF No. 16. Under the terms of that order, Protected Material may only be filed under seal or on reasonable notice to the Government, to allow the parties to confer on its appropriate treatment. Id. ¶ 5. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Defendant's filing be stricken from the docket. It is further ORDERED that Defendant shall refile the motion only in compliance with the terms of the Protective Order. + +The Clerk of Court is directed to strike the filing at ECF No. 31 from the docket. + +SO ORDERED. + +Dated: April 3, 2020 New York, New York + +ANALISA United Statcs District Judge \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845851/EFTA02845851.metadata.json b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845851/EFTA02845851.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ceb9820f40528426acee5e0eb9ef9d4dbd151738 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845851/EFTA02845851.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845851.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1039, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.75, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "ORDER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 430.84799999999996, + 199.26 + ], + [ + 481.92315673828125, + 199.26 + ], + [ + 481.92315673828125, + 213.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 430.84799999999996, + 213.7330322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02845851" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845852/EFTA02845852.md b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845852/EFTA02845852.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..11f5f67614672530ef02b587bf7dfa2a2f9d2335 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845852/EFTA02845852.md @@ -0,0 +1,546 @@ +### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK + +) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) 19 Cr. 830-2(AT) ) -against- ) Oral Argument Requested TOVA NOEL and MICHAEL ) ) Defendants. ) ) + +### MOTION OF MICHAEL TO COMPEL DISCOVERY + +Montell Figgins, Esquire Attorney for Defendant, Michael The Law Offices of Montell Figgins, LLC 17 Academy Street Suite 305 Newark, NJ 07102 973-242-4700 + +April 9, 2020 + +### TABLE OF CONTENTS + +| TABLE OF AUTHORITIES | | | +|--------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------| +| INTRODUCTION | | 1 | +| BACKGROUND | | 2 | +| A . | The Indictment Alleges that Mr.a | | +| | Conspired with Co-Defendant, Noel, end Created False Records | .2 | +| B . | Mr. ' Rule 16 and Brady-Giglio Requests for Production of | | +| | Documents Have Been Denied | 2-3 | +| C . | The Inspector General's Report and Any Other Reports, Documents, and/or Memoranda Made by Other Federal Agencies Investigating the Incident Surrounding the Death of Jeffrey Epstein | | +| | Are Discoverable and Must Be Produced | 3-4 | +| D . | The Information Sought by This Motion | 4-7 | +| ARGUMENT | | 8 | +| A . | The Complete Inspector General's Report, as Well as | | +| | the Other .1 fi ts Requested Are Necessary for | | +| | Michael to Prepare His Defense | 8-11 | +| B. | Rule 16 and Brady-Giglio Include the Production of Documents | | +| | And Reports Generated by Other Agencies | 11-14 | +| C. | The Reports and Documents Requested Are | | +| | Discoverable Under Brady | 14-16 | +| CONCLUSION | | 16 | +| SIGNATURE AND SUBMISSION | | 16 | + +### TABLE OF AUTHORITIES + +### CASES + +| Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) | 14 | +|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------| +| Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150, 154-55 (1972) | 15 | +| In re Sealed Case No. 99-3096 (Brady Obligations), 185 F.3d 887, 892 (D.C. Cir. 1999) | 15 | +| United States v. Armstrong, 517 U.S. 456, 462 (1996) | 8 | +| United States v. Ashley, 905 F. Supp. 1146, 1168 (E.D.N.Y.1995) | 10 | +| United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667, 674-75 (1985) | 14 | +| United States v. Bryan, 868 F.2d 1032 (9th Cir.1989), | 11-12 | +| United States v. , 191 F. Supp. 2d. 88, 90 (D.D.C. 2002) | 16 | +| United States v.=, 786 F. Supp. 11, 13 (D.D.C. 1991) | 9 | +| U.S. v. Wen, 379 F. Supp. 2d 337 (S.D. N.Y. 2004) | 8, 11 | +| United States v. Libby, 432 F. Supp. 81 (D.D.C. 2006) | 12-13 | +| United States v. Lloyd, 992 F.2d 348, 351 (D.C. Cir. 1993) | 9, 13 | +| United States v. Maniktala, 934 F.2d 25, 28 (2d Cir.1991) | 10 | +| United States v. Marshall, 132 F.3d 63, 68 (D.C. Cir. 1998) | 9, 12-13 | +| United States v. McGuinness, 764 F. Supp. 888, 895 (S.D.N.Y.1991) | 8,10 | +| United States v. Paxson, 861 F.2d 730, 737 (D.C. Cir. 1988) | 15 | +| United States v. Poindexter, 727 F. Supp. 1470, 1473 (D.D.C. 1989) | 8 | +| United States v. Safavian, 233 F.R.D. 12 (D.D.C. 2005) | 14-15 | +| United States v.M, 488 F. Supp. 2d 350, 356 (S.D.N.Y.2007) | 9 | +| United States v. Sudikoff, 36 F. Supp. 2d 1196, 1198-99 (C.D.Ca1. 1999) | 15 | +| United States v. Trevino, 556 F.2d 1265, 1272 (5th Cir.1977) | 11 | +| United States of America v. Volpe, 42 F. Supp. 2d 204 (E.D.N.Y. 1999) | 12 | + +### RULES + +| Fed. R. Crim. P. 16 | 1-2, 4, 7-8, 11-15 | +|---------------------------------|--------------------| +| Rule I6(a)(1)(C) | 11,13 | +| Fed. R. Crim. P. 16(a)(1)E | 8 | +| Fed. R. Grim. P. 16(a)(1)(E)(i) | 8,10 | + +### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK + +) + +UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) 19 Cr. 830-2(AT) + +) + +-against- + +) + +TOVA NOEL and MICHAEL ) + +) + +Defendants. ) + +) + +Oral Argument Requested + +### MOTION OF MICHA O COMPEL + +### INTRODUCTION + +Defendant, Michael, through his counsel, hereby moves for an order compelling the government to produce information in its possession or accessible to it from other agencies allied with the prosecution, concerning investigations and other materials relating to the facts alleged in the indictment, including but not limited to such documents that relate to the investigation into the death of Jeffrey Epstein, that is (a) material to the preparation under Fed. R. Crim. P. 16, and/or (b) exculpatory, inculpatory, or impeachment information discoverable under the Brady-Giglio doctrine. + +The information requested in this motion has been previously requested by the defense in a letter dated January 29, 2020 from the Office of the United States Attorney, Southern District of New York. (See Exhibit A.) Through counsel from said office, the request has been denied, with government prosecutors referring defense counsel to their hi-court statements made on November 25, 2019. (See Exhibit B.) + +### BACKGROUND + +### A. The Indictment Alleges that Mr.= Conspired with Co-Defendant, 21.\_To\_el, and Created False Records + +The government's investigation in this case began upon the discovery of the alleged suicide of Jeffrey Epstein, on August 10, 2019, at the Metropolitan Correctional Center ("MCC"). + +At that time, Mr.in, and Co-Defendant, Noel, were on duty as correctional officers in the section of the MCC, known as the Special Housing Unit ("SHU"). + +The indictment (Indictment, Introduction at ¶ 1), alleges, among other things, that certain prison counts, in other words, physically counting the prisoners in the cells, were not made by the defendants. In addition, the indictment alleges that the defendants, then, agreed and conspired to conceal the failure to conduct the prison counts, by creating and signing false records, attesting that such counts had occurred. (Id.) + +Thus, the indictment charges the defendants with conspiracy. (Indictment, Count One at ¶ 28.) In addition, the indictment charges the defendants with creating false records. (Indictment, Count Four at ¶ 15.) Defendant, M, is not charged in Counts Two and Three of the indictment. + +### B. Mr. ' Rule 16 and Brady-Giglio Requests for Production of Documents Have Been Denied + +On December 16, 2019, the parties agreed to a protective order as to discovery, and on that day this Court entered same (Docket # 13). On January 29, 2020, defendant, , made certain requests to the government under Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. (See Exhibit A.) Approximately, forty-five days later, on March 14, 2020, the government responded to the requests made by defendant, with a one sentence denial of said request. The substance of the response was that the defendant should refer to the government's responses made at the pretrial conference of November 25, 2019. (11/25/2019 - Docket Minute Entry). + +This refusal is perplexing and nonsensical because these same government prosecutors presented the defendant with a consent to search document from the office of the Inspector General. (See Exhibit C.) + +This motion concerns the defense requests for production of documents regarding important and essential issues in this case. Moreover, the public sphere is replete with information that the Inspector General of the United States opened an investigation into the circumstances surrounding the death of Jeffrey Epstein. (See article attached as Exhibit D.) Additionally, it is undisputed that the Inspector General also conducted an extensive investigation into inner workings of the Bureau of Prisons ("BOP"). The United States Attorney General, William Barr and the Acting Bureau of Prisons commissioner, Kathleen Hawk Sawyer both made numerous public statements that the Inspector General was undertaking an in-depth investigation into the Bureau of Prisons' policies, procedures, staffing and criminal conduct as a direct result of the death of Jeffrey Epstein at MCC on August 10, 2019. (See Exhibit D.) This report is important because the defendant believes that this report will contain information that is material and relevant to his defense. Moreover, it is the defendant's assertion that staffing issues, staffing shortages, supervisory lapses and the enforcement/interpretation of BOP procedures go to the heart of his defense to the government's criminal allegations. + +The government's response to Mr. discovery request was not detailed and simply made a blanket denial without giving Mr. the respect to state any legal justification for the denial. Defendant, , therefore, brings this Motion to Compel, as to the items originally requested by his counsel. + +- C. The Inspector General's Report and Any Other Reports, Documents, and/or Memoranda Made by Other Federal Agencies Investigating the Incident Surrounding the Death ofJeffrey Epstein Are Discoverable and Must Be Produced + +As stated previously, there is no dispute that multiple investigations by numerous federal agencies were opened to investigate the events surrounding the death of Jeffrey Epstein on August 10, 2019. Michael= is charged with certain crimes resulting from this same event. On August 10, 2019, the Washington Examiner, reported under the headline: "Barr announces DO1 inspector general investigation into Epstein death." (See Exhibit 13.) On December 28, 2019, Reuters reported under the headline: "FBI investigating Jeffrey Epstein's inner circle."' On September 11, 2019, CNN reported under the headline: "The Jeffrey Epstein investigation was more expansive than previously thought, documents show."2 This news clip refers to what appears to be a separate investigation by the U.S. Marshals Service. On the Wikipedia page entitled, "Death of Jeffrey Epstein," the following appears, among other information: "After initially expressing suspicion, Attorney General William Ban described Epstein's death as `a perfect storm of screw-ups.' Both the FBI and U.S. Department of Justice's Inspector General are conducting investigations into the circumstances of his death.;" + +### D. The Information Sought by This Motion, + +In the minute entry on the docket, of November 25, 2019, this Court noted, among other things, "The Government shall produce discovery to the defense by December 31, 2019." This discovery was not produced. Because the government has failed to meet the disclosure mandates of Rule 16 and Brady-Giglio, this motion seeks to compel the government to produce the following: 1) Inspector General's report investigating the death of Jeffrey Epstein and the Bureau of Prisons' policies and procedures; 2) any reports, witness statements, memorandum, and documents from any separate investigation conducted by the BOP; and 3) any reports, witness statements and/or documents created by any other federal agencies that investigated the circumstances surrounding the death of Jeffrey Epstein that have not already been disclosed. + +2See, ktUnlliwww.cnn.coin11019/09/ I 1 fucticffrev.eputtlivirmatication-ps-marchals4documemfinclexliml + +See. YouTube clip: littne:Pwww.voutubc\_com\_hvatch?v..SI haGuVBC4 + +3 See, uips://en.wikivedia.oreAliktVearh of Jeffrey Satiellt + +1 . The report of the Inspector General, as to both defendants, including, any and all supporting memorandums, written statements, photos, videos, and incident reports + +The defendant is entitled to complete disclosure of the Inspector General's report. Moreover, Mr. an a right to any and all information obtained in this investigation. Not only is it possible that this report contains additional witness statements but this report also has information that has not been furnished by the government in any capacity previously. Moreover, while the government would like to limit its discovery obligation to reports, videos and documents related specifically to night and early morning hours of August 10, 2019, the defense submits that there is a much larger context that lead to those events and the charges against Michael Mil Indeed, the Attorney General of the United States and the "acting" commissioner of the BOP opened an investigation that was precipitated by the events of August 10, 2019 but said investigation was much more expansive and in-depth. In November 2019, the "acting" commissioner Kathleen Hawks Sawyer stated at a congressional hearing under oath that there were more than 3300 vacancies within the BOP and she was surprised that the BOP was able to fiinction with such issues. She went on to state that: 'The vast majority of staff are good, hardworking employees, "but they are tired because they are stretched." (See article attached as Exhibit E.) The broad depth of the Inspector General's report presumably was that there were a myriad of systematic issues affecting the BOP that allowed the events of August 10, 2019 and the death of Jeffrey Epstein to occur. Accordingly, the defendant is entitled to disclosure of any and all of this information, especially if it relates to his defense of the charges that have been initiated. It is the defendant's contention that this report may also contain Brady-Giglio material. Indeed, the prosecutors in this case may be denying the defendant his right to this material without any knowledge of its contents. If so, this is a dereliction of their duty and denies Mr. important rights that are the foundation of our judicial system. + +- 2. Any and all internal investigative reports created by the BOP as to both defendants, including, any and all supporting memorandums, written statements, photos, videos, and incident reports + +To date, the government has disclosed a multitude of discovery documents but those documents only relate to witness statements, video and incident reports concerning the events of August 10, 2019. Michael would like this court to authorize the disclosure of any and all reports generated by investigators within the Bureau of Prisons regarding the August 10, 2019 incident, if those have not been disclosed. Additionally, the defendant seeks any all documents, reports, witness statements and disciplinary records of any and all MCC employees who have engaged in the same or similar conduct. Mr. S requests the results of any disciplinary proceedings and documents maintained by the BOP regarding the discipline or administrative adjudication of any other employees who have failed to conduct rounds or inmate counts. More specifically, the defense is aware that there was an almost identical incident in 2005 or 2006 wherein officers failed to conduct institutional counts or rounds and an inmate committed suicide. The defense believes that only one of four officers in that case was given only a minor (14) day suspension. Moreover, although the government will argue that this incident is fax removed from the current incident, the defendant disagrees. Mr. knew some of the individuals in that incident and he was well aware that their conduct did not lead to their indictment or incarceration. In fact, many of those officers did not receive as much as a reprimand for falsifying the same documents that Mr. is now charged with a federal crime for submitting. This goes to Mr. =I' defense in this case. The defendant's state of mind is always a material and relevant fact in any criminal cast. Indeed, the mens for U.S. Code § 1001 is that the party knowingly and willfully made the false statement. Undoubtedly, given the assertions already made this information is of significant importance to Mr. defense. + +- 3. As to both defendants, any and all reports, memorandums, written statements, photos, videos, and incident reports created, manufactured or possessed by any investigative or disciplinary agencies, participating in the investigation of the defendants, allied with the prosecution, and to which the prosecution has access + +Defendant, M, believes that the information contained in all of the requested documents may contain information that tends to exculpate him. He believes, in addition, that there may be other witnesses, or witness statements that are relevant, and which are not in the possession of the FBI investigators, who submitted reports in this case. Such reports will contain detailed information and statistics that show the conduct in which the defendant is being charged with a crime were: 1) rampant throughout the BOP; 2) made with knowledge and acquiescence by the leadership of the BOP; 3) made as a result of BOP policies that forced the defendant to engage in conduct for which he is now being charged criminally, and; 4) made in a manner which contains a possible discriminatory application of BOP policies by government prosecutors. + +The information requested by this motion is not the only information that Mr. a seeks under Rule 16 and Brady-Giglio. Further discovery motions will be necessary, once counsel has had the opportunity to review any response made by the government, in compliance with any order entered by this Court on this motion. The present motion is filed at this time because the government has refused the defendant's request to engage in a fair and impartial disclosure of relevant discovery. Early resolution of this dispute will enable defense counsel to determine the necessity and scope of pretrial subpoenas duces tecum. + +### ARGUMENT + +A. The Complete Inspector General's R Well as the Other Reports Requested Are Necessary for Michae are His Defense + +Mr. requests for the aforementioned discovery is authorized and contemplated by the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Fed. R. Crim. P. 16(a)(1)E, provides: + +> "(E) Documents and Objects. Upon a defendant's request, the government must permit the defendant to inspect and to copy or photograph books, papers, documents, data, photographs, tangible objects, buildings or places, or copies or portions of any of these items, if the item is within the government's possession, custody, or control and: + +- (i) the item is material to preparing the defense; +- (ii) the government intends to use the item in its case-inchief at trial; or +- (iii) the item was obtained from or belongs to the defendant." + +Rule 16(a)(1)(E)(i) entitles a defendant to documents or other items that are material to preparing arguments in response to the prosecution's case-in-chief. See United States v. Armstrong, 517 U.S. 456, 462 (1996). The key term for present purposes is "material." A document is material if: + +> (Iit could be used to counter the government's case or to bolster a defense; information not meeting either of those criteria is not to be deemed material within the meaning of the Rule merely because the government may be able to use it to rebut a defense position.... Nor is it to be deemed material merely because it would have dissuaded the defendant from proffering easily impeached testimony. U.S. v. Rigas, 258 F.Supp.2d 299 (S.D. N.Y. 2003) + +The federal courts have consistently taken an expansive view of what the term "material" means when it comes to ruling in favor of disclosure under Rule 16. Evidence is material if its pretrial disclosure will enable a defendant to alter significantly the quantum of proof in his favor. See United States v. McGuinness, 764 F. Supp. 888, 895 (S.D.N.Y.1991) and U.S. v. Giffen, 379 F. Supp. 2d 337 (S.D. N.Y. 2004) Numerous federal districts have repeatedly ruled that "evidence is material under Rule 16 as long as there is a strong indication that it will play an important role + +in uncovering admissible evidence, aiding witness preparation, corroborating testimony, or assisting impeachment or rebuttal." United States v. Marshall, 132 F.3d 63, 68 (D.C. Cir. 1998) (quoting United States v. Lloyd, 992 F.2d 348, 351 (D.C. Cir. 1993)) (internal quotation marks omitted). Courts have interpreted the scope of Rule 16 (a)(1)(E)(i) broadly to ensure that defendants such as Mr. have a fair opportunity to prepare for trial. United States v. Poindexter, 727 F. Supp. 1470, 1473 (D.D.C. 1989) ("The language and the spirit of the Rule are designed to provide to a criminal defendant, in the interest of fairness, the widest possible opportunity to inspect and receive such materials in the possession of the government as may aid him in presenting his side of the case.") Accordingly, the "materiality standard normally is not a heavy burden." United States v. 488 F. Supp. 2d 350, 356 (S.D.N.Y.2007) (quoting United States v. Lloyd, 992 F.2d 348, 351 (D.C.Cir.1993)). Lloyd, 992 F.2d at 351 (internal citation and quotation marks omitted); United States v. 786 F. Supp. 11, 13 (D.D.C. 1991) (the materiality hurdle "is not a high one"). The requested documents in this motion are essential to Mr. ability to prepare a defense. Mr. contends that the conduct with which he is being charged is: I) rampant throughout the BOP; 2) made with knowledge and acquiescence by the leadership of the BOP; and 3) is the direct result of BOP policies and mismanagement that forced the defendant to engage in conduct for which he is now being charged criminally. Moreover, the information sought in this motion is crucial to the preparation of Mr. defense. For instance, Mr. will assert that the rampant staffing shortages present at the MCC in August of 2019 led to the conduct for which Mr. is now criminally charged. If the Court accepts this representation, then the Court should find that the discovery requests contained in this motion are "material" and must be disclosed. As support for this position the defendant has attached an excerpt from a union committee meeting that was held merely 3 days before Jeffrey Epstein died at MCC on August 10, 2019. The attached memorandum memorializes a meeting attended by Jermaine Darden, the captain of the MCC, wherein he was + +informed that there were severe staffing shortages in the SHU where the alleged crime took place and that these staffing shortages created a significant safety risk. (See excerpt attached as Exhibit F.) + +Additionally, Michael = is charged with making false statements for signing certain count slips and round sheets. However, what the government has deliberately failed to clarify is that those documents have to be approved by supervisors and are signed and/or initialed by other BOP employees. If this is the case, why is Michael= and Tova Noel the only two employees charged with making false statements. Indeed, according to the government, they have video showing Mr= sleeping and surfing the intemet instead of doing the rounds as required. Importantly, on the night in question, there is at least one BOP employee tasked with watching the surveillance cameras. Presumably, this person would have watched Mr.= sit in his chair and sleep and then observe him present a document stating that he conducted rounds. It is defendants' burden to make a prima facie showing that documents sought under Rule 16(a)(1)(E)(i) are material to preparing the defense. McGuinness, 764 F. Supp. at 894. "To establish a showing of materiality, a defendant must offer more than the conclusory allegation that the requested evidence is material." See United States V. Ashley, 905 F. Supp. 1146, 1168 (E.D.N.Y.1995) The defendant submits that he has carried this burden. Plainly, the documents upon which the government procured an indictment based on making a false statement have to be reviewed, verified and signed by other BOP employees and/or supervisory personnel. However, inexplicably none of those individuals are charged with violating the law. This issue standing alone establishes the import of how the requested disclosures will assist "the defendant significantly to alter the quantum of proof in his favor." United Stales v. Maniktala, 934 F.2d 25, 28 (2d Cir.1991) The requested reports go to the heart of Mr. = 1 defense. He needs to know if these issues are addressed in the Inspector General's report or in any other reports by + +government agencies because it is highly relevant to Mr. ' defense in this case. Furthermore, the government had Mr. MB sign a consent form specifically from the Inspector General's office. (See Exhibit C.) Thereafter, the government turned over the results of this search in the normal course of discovery production. This fact shows that the Inspector General was investigating this incident thus all information they receive is discoverable. This Court should order the production of the documents within forty-five (45) days from the entry of an order on this motion. + +### B. Rule 16 and Brady-Giglio Include the Production of Documents and Reports Generated by Other Agencies + +The facts, shown above as reported in the media and secondary sources, clearly show that other agencies were involved in the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein's death and the defendant's arrest and indictment. Thus, clearly, this Court should not permit the government to self-limit discovery. A prosecutor is not "allowed to avoid disclosure of evidence by the simple expedient of leaving relevant evidence to repose in the hands of another agency while utilizing his access to it in preparing his case for trial." United States v. Trevino, 556 F.2d 1265, 1272 (5th Cir.1977); U.S. v. Gillen, 379 F. Supp. 2d 337 (S.D. N.Y. 2004) + +In United States v. Bryan, 868 F.2d 1032 (9th Cir.I989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 858, 110 S.Ct. 167, 107 L.Ed.2d 124 (1989), after a nationwide investigation by the IRS, Bryan had been convicted of, among other things, conspiracy to defraud the United States. Bryan sought discovery, under Rule 16(a)(1)(C) of items that were in the possession of the FBI. The charges against Bryan stemmed from the IRS investigation, and this difference, together with the further objection that production should be limited only to documents found in the District in which the matter was pending, Oregon, formed the basis of the government's objection. + +Bryan argued, conversely, that the `government' under the Rule, included not only the prosecutors, but also any closely connected investigative agencies. The Court dispensed with the 'out of District' argument by the government, ruling that Rule 16 was not so limiting. + +With respect to the issue of production of items from other closely connected agencies, the Court found in favor of Bryan as far as discovery of items by such agencies. In setting forth the rule, the Court said: "The prosecutor will be deemed to have knowledge of and access to anything in the possession, custody and control of any federal agency participating in the same investigation of the defendant." Id. at 1036. + +The District Courts of New York have followed Bryan, supra. In United States of America v. Volpe, 42 F. Supp. 2d 204 (E.D.N.Y. 1999), also a corrections/police officer case, the Court found that the materials were discoverable from any other agencies "allied with the prosecution." Id at 221. In addition, in citing to Bryan, supra, the Court stated that: "Another factor in the analysis is whether or not the prosecution has access to the materials." Id. + +In this matter, defendant, has shown that other agencies 'allied with the prosecution,' have and/or arc, participating with each other. The statement of Attorney General, William Ban., confirms that a separate investigation was initiated by the Inspector General. Additionally, it seems more than obvious that the internal affairs division within the BOP conducted a separate investigation into the events in questions. Importantly, Rule 16 focuses on the preparation of the defense. Therefore, documents are material under Rule l6 and subject to disclosure if they help the defense to ascertain the strengths and weaknesses of the government's case. Marshall, 132 F.3d at 67-68. + +Other Districts have also followed Bryan. In United States v. Libby, 432 F. Supp. 81 (D.D.C. 2006), the Court was faced with a motion to compel, by defendant, I. `Scooter' Libby, in the Valerie Plame CIA leak case. The matter concerning Libby concerned whether he lied as to the disclosures as to Plame. Libby sought documents which, as the Court pointed out, were of a + +far-reaching nature, including documents related to a revenge issue as to Valerie Flame, and her late husband, Ambassador Wilson. The Court in Libby ruled in favor for the defense and granted the motion to compel discovery in several key areas of the case. + +This Court will find Libby, supra, important because the Court's decision in that case focused on "all agencies" that have information regarding the offenses charged. In the instant matter, therefore, it will not be enough for the government to state that other agencies may not be allied with the prosecution, or that the government lacks access to the documents. If the documents provide exculpatory evidence, and are related to the issues in the indictment, they must be produced. + +In Marshall, 132 F.3d at 63, the defendant was charged in a drug related transaction. There were records on visitation from the local jail where the defendant was incarcerated, pager records, the pager, and local records from the county public records about a traffic stop. These items were uncovered by the government agents investigating the matter, but only after discovery had been concluded. During the course of the trial, the Court took a four-day adjournment, in order to address the newly discovered evidence. The trial judge decided to exclude all of the newly discovered evidence, and, as a result, Marshall was found guilty. On appeal, the government argued that, in fact, the newly discovered evidence, under Rule 16, tended to incriminate, not exculpate Marshall. On appeal, the Court disagreed, citing Rule 16(a)(1)(C) as requiring the production of items that are material to the preparation of the defendant's case. The Court, in addition, rejected the government's argument, that the items must be `materially exculpatory,' Id. at 68. In announcing the rule, that Court stated: "In United States v. Lloyd, we said that evidence is material under Rule 16 `as long as there is a strong indication that it will play an important role in uncovering admissible evidence, aiding witness preparation, corroborating testimony, or assisting impeachment or rebuttal.' See Lloyd at 351. + +Undoubtedly, the government is going to assert that the requested documents in this motion are not relevant or material and do not bear on the charges as they relate to the conduct that did or did not take place on August 10, 2019. The documents sought arc material if they will help the defense with trial preparation tasks such as evaluating the strength of the government's case, investigating possible defenses, finding additional relevant evidence, and developing strategies to impeach government witnesses. See United States v. Safavian, 233 F.R.D. 12 (D.D.C. 2005) It is not up to the government to define Mtg.'. defenses to the indictment or to determine what is useful in preparing them. + +For these reasons, this Court should include the requirement of the production of both inculpatory and exculpatory evidence in any order granting this motion to compel. + +At this juncture, however, the government has made, at best, a token objection to the discovery by citing to a terse denial made at a previous court appearance. + +Mr- ME therefore, cannot guess what may be other objections, but this Court should overrule any such attestations as going against fundamental fairness. + +### C. The Reports and Documents Requested Are Discoverable Under Brady + +This motion has articulated several rationales upon which the defendant in this matter is entitled to much more information than the government is voluntarily willing to disclose. The government's disclosure obligations do not end with Rule 16. Much of the discovery sought by this motion is firmly rooted within the scriptures of documents that must be disclosed under the doctrine set forth in Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and its progeny. + +Under Brady, the government has an affirmative duty to produce any evidence favorable to the defendant that is material to either guilt or punishment. See United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667, 674-75 (1985) (the prosecution is required "to disclose evidence favorable to the accused that, if suppressed, would deprive the defendant of a fair trial"). Both exculpatory information and evidence that can be used to impeach the prosecution's witnesses are considered + +"favorable" under Brady and must be disclosed by the government. Id. at 676-77; see also Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150, 154-55 (1972); In re Sealed Case No. 99-3096 (Brady Obligations), 185 F.3d 887, 892 (D.C. Cir. 1999). Moreover, the defense is already in possession of witness statements that one or both of the defendants in this indictment may have conducted rounds or inmate counts on August 10, 2019. Accordingly, there is a logical assumption that there might be additional exculpatory statements contained in the Inspector General's report or certain internal reports maintained by the BOP internal affairs division or other government agencies that were conducting a contemporaneous investigation with FBI. + +The prosecution must produce to the defense not only all favorable evidence that is admissible, but also all evidence "that is lficely to lead to favorable evidence that would be admissible." Safavian, 233 at 17 (quoting United States v. Sudikoff, 36 F. Supp. 2d 1196, 1198- 99 (C.D.Cal. 1999)). Just as with Rule 16 disclosure, the government must interpret its Brady obligations broadly. "Where doubt exists as to the usefulness of the evidence to the defendant, the government must resolve all such doubts in favor of full disclosure." Id. (citing United States v. Paxson, 861 F.2d 730, 737 (D.C. Cir. 1988). Without question, the Brady disclosure obligation is broader than Rule 16 because it requires production not just of documents, but also of information known to the government that has been documented in some fashion. + +In Safavian, the court explained the materiality standard under Brady that applies to pretrial discovery: + +> (T)he government must always produce any potentially exculpatory or otherwise favorable evidence without regard to how the withholding of such evidence might be viewed-- with the benefit of hindsight--as affecting the outcome of the trial. The question before trial is not whether the government thinks that disclosure of the infonnation or evidence it is considering withholding might change the outcome of the trial going forward, but whether the evidence is favorable and therefore must be disclosed. + +Id. at 16 (citing cases); see also United States 191 F. Supp. 2d. 88, 90 (D.D.C. 2002). + +The defendant avers that much of the requested reports fall well into the conscripts of Brady and thus should be disclosed in pretrial discovery. + +### CONCLUSION + +The Motion to Compel of defendant, should be granted, and this Court should order the production of documents within forty-five (45) days from the date of the Order. + +RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, + +/s/ + +Montell Figgins, Esquire Attorney for Defendant, Michael The Law Offices of Montell Figgins, LLC 17 Academy Street Suite 305 Newark, NJ 07102 973-242-4700 + +### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE + +I HEREBY CERTIFY, that on the 1st day of April, 2020, I uploaded the original of this Motion to Compel onto ECF, and provided courtesy email copies by email to: + +Nicolas Tyler Landsman Roos Assistant U.S. Attorney United States Attorney's Office, SDNY One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York, NY 10007 (212)-637-2421 Email: nicolas.roosOuisdoj.eov + +Rebekah= Donaleski Assistant U.S. Attorney United States Attorney's Office, SDNY One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York, NY 10007 212-637-2423 Fax: 212-637-2443 Email: Rebekah•Donaleskiralusdoi.gov + +Jessica= Lonergan Assistant U.S. Attorney U.S. Attorneys Office, SDNY One St. Andrew's Plaza New York, NY 10007 (212)-637-1038 Fax: (212)-637-2937 Email: jessica.lonergatausdoj.aoy + +/s/ + +Montell Figgins + +# EXHIBIT A + +![](_page_22_Picture_1.jpeg) + +### The Law Offices of MONTELL FIGGINS 1-1-0 + +17 Academy Street. Siite 305 Newark, New Jersey 07102 Phone: (973) 242-4700 Fax: (973) 242-4701 WAsv.figginslaw.corn + +BRANCH OFF,CES: + +140 East Ridgenood Avenue Paramus, NJ 07640 + +Reply to Newark Office (X] + +Kenneth E , Esq. Linda Chlds, . + +### SENT VIA. EMAIL + +Rebekah Donaleski Assistant United States Attorneys Southern District of New York One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York, NY 10007 + +30 WM Street Roar New Yak, NY 1005 + +I + +January 29, 2020 + +Re: State of NY v Michael, et al. Docket No.: 1:19-cr-00830 Discovery Request + +Dear Ms. Donaleski: + +As previously discussed, I am making a formal request pursuant to Rule 16(a)(1)(C) for any and all reports, memorandums, written statements, photos, videos, and incident reports created, manufactured or possessed by the United States Inspector GeneraL + +Please see U.S. v. Bryan, 868 F.2d 1032 (1989) if you maintain that Mr. is not entitled to the requested documents. + +Respectfully yours, + +/s/ Mantel! Figgins + +Montell Figgins, Esq. + +Attorney for Defendant Michael + +cc: Jason Erroy Foy, Esq, Counsel for Defendant Nod via ECF + +## EXHIBIT B + +### "PROTECTED MATERIAL" + +# EXHIBIT C + +![](_page_26_Picture_1.jpeg) + +### United States Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General + +### Consent to Search Computer/Electronic Equipment + +I, \IV( CM {Cave been asked to give my consent to the search of my computer/elecnonic equipment Ihave also been informed of my right to refuse to consent to rack astarch. I have been informed that I have a right not to have my computer/electronic equipment searched without asearch warrant + +I, hereby authorize 151 and any other person(s) designated by theDepartment of Justice Office of the Inspector General to conduct at any time a complete search oL + +OAll computerielectronic equipment located at These persons arc authorized by me to take from the above location: any computer hardware and storage media, including internal hard disk drive(s), floppy diskettes, compact disks, scanners, printers, other computahlettromc hardware or software and related manuals; any other electronic storage devices, including but not limited to, personal digital assistants, cellular telephones, and electronic pagers; and any other media or materials necessary to assist in accessing the stored °ketonic data. + +..fpr The following electronic devices: Dati0031 ofeomputer, don storage device, cellular telephone, or other device (make, model, and serial member. if available) + +pvve lyhci,ft-2 Ls + +Icerd& Outlay/a posses, control, and/or have a tight of access to use these devices and all information found in them. Iunderstand that any contraband or evidence on these devices may be used against me in a criminal, civil, or administrative proceeding. + +Irelinquish any constitutional right to privacy in these electronic devices and any information stored on them. I authorize the Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General to make and keep acopy of any information stored on these devices. Iunderstand that any copy made by the Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General will become the property of + +the Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General and that I will have no privacy or possessory interest in the copy. This written permission is given by me voluntarily. I have not been threatened, placed under duress, or prgstised air/thing + +in exchange for my consent they° taut this form; it hes been teadby me; and I understand it. I understand the "CVt isk\ language and have been able to communicate with agents/officers + +Iunder I may withdraw my consent at any time. I may also ask for a receipt for all things turned over. + +Signed: Signature of WillteSSCS 1-41 + +Date and Time + +## EXHIBIT D + +### Barr announces DOJ inspector general investigation into Epstein death + +by Jerry Dunleavy l August 10, 2019 01:16 PM + +Attorney General William Barr announced following Jeffrey Epstein's apparent suicide Saturday morning that Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz launched an investigation into the circumstances of the accused child sex trafficker's death in his prison cell. + +This move is in addition to the FBI inquiry already underway. The FBI declined to comment about its investigation. + +"I was appalled to learn that Jeffrey Epstein was found dead early this morning from an apparent suicide while in federal custody," Barr said. "Mr. Epstein's death raises serious questions that must be answered." + +Neither the Justice Department not the inspector general's office immediately responded to the Washington Examinees request for further details. + +The Bureau of Prisons released a statement on Saturday stating that the jet-setting financier and sex offender was found "unresponsive in his cell" located in the Special Housing Unit at around 6:30 a.m. this morning following "an apparent suicide." Officials said lifesaving efforts were immediately undertaken and that emergency medical services were quickly called. Epstein was brought to a local hospital where he was pronounced dead. + +Epstein reportedly hanged himself, and a gurney carrying Epstein's body was wheeled out of the Manhattan Correctional Center around 7:30 a.m. this morning, according to reports. + +According to a representative for NYC Office of Chief Medical Examiner who spoke with the Washington Examiner, "there is no official cause of death yet" as "the medical examiner has to do their job." + +"We are investigating the cause of death and we have an open case," the representative said. + +The 14-page indictment against Epstein alleged that he sexually exploited dozens of minor girls at his homes in Manhattan, New York, and Palm Beach, among other locations, between 2002 and 2005 and perhaps beyond. Some of the victims were ostensibly as young as 14 at the time the alleged crimes occurred. Epstein allegedly "created a vast network of underage • victims for him to sexually exploit"and "maintained a steady supply of new victims." + +Epstein was reportedly found nearly unconscious on his cell floor with marks on his neck back in July, but it had never been officially confirmed by authorities whether he had attempted to take his own life, whether he'd been assaulted by another inmate, or whether it was a ploy to change prisons. + +Epstein was subsequently placed on suicide watch, but there are numerous reports that when he was found dead Saturday he "was in his cell but was not on suicide watch at the time of his death!" + +The Manhattan Correctional Center did not immediately respond to questions from the Washington Examiner about the circumstances of Epstein's suicide and how it was allowed to happen. + +Horowitz has handled high-profile investigations before. Last summer, the watchdog released a 568-page report on Midyear Exam, the DOJ and FBI investigation into former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's improper private email server. And the inspector general is expected to release the results of his investigation into allegations of abuse of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act during the Trump-Russia probe sometime around Labor Day. + +Epstein's apparent suicide followed the unsealing on Friday of 2,000 pages of court records by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit connected to the defamation lawsuit brought by Epstein accuser against British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's on-againoff-again girlfriend and longtime associate whom has accused of helping Epstein abuse her and other women when was underage. The records included allegations by that Maxwell instructed her to have sex with the U.K.'s Prince Andrew, New Mexico Gov. Bill and former Sen. Mitchell as well as money manager Glenn and MIT professor Marvin Minksy, among other high-profile figures. + +Before Friday, Epstein's flight records spanning from 1999 through 2005 had been made public, but new flight manifests ranging from November 1995 through August 2013 were released Friday. The records show Epstein crisscrossed the globe accompanied by tycoons, celebrities, employees, friends, and politicos. + +Alex Acosta, the former U.S. attorney for Southern Florida, reached an agreement in 2008 with Epstein's attorneys in which Epstein was allowed to plead guilty to two state-level prostitution solicitation charges. Epstein served just 13 months of an 18-month stint at a Palm Beach County jail where he was allowed out on work release, paid restitution to certain victims, and registered as a sex offender. The agreement was reportedly struck before investigators had finished interviewing all the alleged victims and was kept secret from some of Epstein's victims. Acosta left his Cabinet position amid increased scrutiny of the sweetheart deal. + +Florida Governor Ron DeSantis announced earlier this week that the Florida Department of Law Enforcement was launching an investigation into the Palm Beach County Sheriffs Office to look at every aspect of Epstein's case in Florida. The Justice Department said in February that it had also launched an internal inquiry into the handling of the Epstein case at the federal level, but the status of that investigation is not known. + +Epstein was arrested at the airport in Teterboro, New Jersey after returning from an overseas trip to Paris in earlyJuly. Epstein's home in New York City was raided by law enforcement as well, and investigators found nude photographs of underage girls, thousands of dollars in cash, dozens of loose diamonds, and a foreign passport from the 1980s with Epstein's picture and a false name. + +Epstein's lawyers had argued that Epstein should be allowed out on house arrest, asking the court to let him await trial in his Manhattan mansion. That request was denied. Besides his New York City mansion, Epstein also had an estate in Palm Beach, maintained a ranch in New Mexico, had a luxury apartment in Paris, and owned a private island in the U.S. Virgin Islands. + +> In denying him bail earlier this month, the judge said that Epstein posed a "significant" danger to the community and agreed with prosecutors that he was a serious flight risk + +# EXHIBIT E + +4/3/2020Lack of Staff and Resources Continue to Strain the Federal Bureau of Prisons - Oversight - Government Executive**Government +Executive** + +## Lack of Staff and Resources Continue to Strain the Federal Bureau of Prisons + +By Courtney Bublé +November 19, 2019 + +The Federal Bureau of Prisons is severely lacking in staff and resources, the director testified before a Senate panel on Tuesday. + +Kathleen Hawk Sawyer, who was bureau director from 1992-2003, came out of retirement to lead the agency again after acting director Hugh Hurwitz was reassigned in the aftermath of financier and alleged sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein's death in August while in federal custody. As the bureau, which oversees 122 federal prisons and more than 170,000 inmates nationwide, is working to implement the First Step Act's prison reforms and deal with the circumstances that led to Epstein's death, it is facing severe resource issues, according to Hawk Sawyer. + +"We have put such huge strains on the Bureau of Prisons trying to accomplish its mission," Hawk Sawyer said before the Senate Judiciary Committee. "With the dramatic growth we've had, the budget outs, staffing shortages, it's just been incredible to me that the bureau has been able to function during the last 16 years that I've been gone." The vast majority of staff are good, hardworking employees, "but they are tired because they are stretched," she added. + +Hawk Sawyer attributed the resource problem to the rapid increase in the prison population in the last 30 years, employees retiring at a faster rate than they are hired, uncertain budgets, the recent government shutdown and the hiring freeze early in the Trump administration. "We have never had adequate resources to provide all the programs for all the inmates," Hawk Sawyer said. "I'm hoping that will change now since you all support the First Step Act." + +According to the bureau's website it currently has 36,348 staff members. *The New York Times* reported: + +Between December 2016 and September 2018 – the date of the most recent data available from the federal Office of Personnel Management – the number of correctional officers fell more than 11%, from 19,082 to 16,898. That decline reversed a longtime trend. Before President Donald Trump took office, the number of federal correctional officers had continuously increased: there were 12.5% more officers at the end of 2016 compared to the beginning of 2012. + +Hawk Sawyer said the bureau has "made great progress" to fill the over 3,300 vacancies nationwide, but it is going to take a while. In order to hire more staff, the bureau is working with the Office of Personnel Management to get direct hiring authority, hiring retirees on a temporary basis because they are already trained and using the professional services company Accenture to recruit young people online. + +Sawyer said the only thing that impedes the bureau from providing adequate care and services for inmates is resources. She expects the agency will receive \$75 million in this year's appropriations for the First Step Act, which the law requires for the first five years, although she hoped for more. Last year the + + + +1/24/3/2020 + +Lack of Staff and Resources Continue to Strain the Federal Bureau of Prisons - Oversight - Government Executive + +money to fund the program had to come out of the agency's own budget since it didn't get any extra from Congress, according to Hawk Sawyer. + +In the meantime, the bureau has been relying on augmentation to temporarily fill correctional officer positions with other staff. Although Sawyer said this is a good process and all staff are trained for this role, she admitted the agency has to use augmentation more than is optimal and often employees are taken away from their designated work. + +In addition to hiring, Hawk Sawyer said the bureau is working to replace the surveillance cameras in all prisons, ensure that staff are thoroughly trained and have managers repeatedly tell staff what their responsibilities are. These are all issues that came to light in the wake of the Epstein scandal. + +As the hearing was going on the Justice Department indicted the two federal correctional officers on duty the night of Epstein's death with falsifying records to say they checked on him. + +Hawk Sawyer agreed with Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, that the Epstein situation was a "black eye" on the entire agency. Since the FBI and the Justice Department Inspector General are looking into the Epstein case she said she could not speak about any specifics. + +"We have some bad staff," Hawk Sawyer said. "We want rid of those bad staff who don't do their job. We want them gone one way or another either by prosecution or by termination. But the good staff are doing extraordinary work out there every day managing the 177,000 inmates. You never hear anything about those people." + +By Courtney Bublé +November 19, 2019 + + + + + +# EXHIBIT F + +![](_page_35_Picture_1.jpeg) + +• r \*a' :3 .37,— fly! • + +#### U.S. DEPHAREMENDOF JUSTICE + +Federal Bureau of Prisons + +Metropolitan Corredional Center + +ISO Pork Row Nor York New York 10007 + +'August 7, 2019 + +AIMMINPOW LMR CRATRPERS0N - EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT + +-, PRESIDENT, LOCAL 3148 + +,SUBJECT: INRC.onsaittee Meeting Minutes August 7, 2019 + +The LMR Meeting was held on Wednesday, August 7, 2O19, at 9:30 a.m. This meeting is acontinuance of previous.Ele maatings.and the discussions of the old and current agenda items from those meetings.. + +The following staff was present: + +(Management) + +WASSISS, LMR Chairperson, Executive Assistant , AW !!!!!!!!!!!!Mliptin AARM + +(Union) + +Imollimme President letaillialea, Vice President INIIS Chief Shop Steward at Shop Steward INSIR, Shop Steward In- Training + +OM Business Items: August 7, 2019 + +### Settled Arbitration Cases: (TABLED) + +UNION: The Union states Management has not complied with the local agreement. Union sent various e-mails and no response. Equipment was ordered to compensate for those who did not receive boots in accordance with the contract. (See previous LMR meeting minutes) The Union + +![](_page_35_Picture_19.jpeg) + +![](_page_35_Picture_20.jpeg) + +### Cross counting of housing units: (TABLED) + +UNION: Has requested the responses from the 6/28/18 LMR. + +MANAGEMENT: Management will provide responses to the union's inquiries communicated on June 28, 2018 by the next LMR meeting scheduled for September 26, 2019. + +#### Lunch Reliefs: (TABLED) + +#### Ouarterly Roster: (CLOSED) + +### Non-Uniform staff attire: (TABLED) + +### New Agenda Items: + +### Correctional Services Annual Leave Schedule: (TABLED) + +MANAGEMENT: Management states they will like to reduce the annual leave schedule from 7 weeks to 5 weeks. + +UNION: The union stales they do not agree with the reduction of annual leave slots, it's a violation of the contract as its not fair and equitable. Correctional services stature being penalized due to local managementfailing to hire. Management has asked to sit down with the captain to discuss an alternative and union is open to discuss by August 15,2019. + +;: . e + +3 + +I + +### Augmentation: (TABLED) + +UNION: The union states various e-mails were sent regarding augmentation. Since March 2019 no one has responded to e-mails. Management has come with a procedure on augmentation.Ve know what the contact states and we have not negotiated. What is the procedure for nonbargaining staff at MCC New York and what order? Today the union is invoking its right to negotiate the procedures and the impact and implementation of the augmentation of the bargaining unit at MCC New York. The local wants to know when managements is available and , ready to move forward on negotiations. Additionally, the local is inquiring as to whether management will comply on the contract and cease the procedures they have in place for augmentation a'the bargaining unit. Union is requested the procedures used as of August 7, 2019and a copy of the list for augmentation, + +MANAGEMENT: Management exercise their rights within the agreement to re-assign staff as needed. Management will not provide the augmentation list to the Union. Management will continue to negotiate ground rules with the local to use for local negotiations on all matters. + +### Under Staffing in SEW:,(TABLED) + +UNION: The union states we are violating the agency's policy by not having enough staff in SHU. It's a safety risk and raises the inherit risk when we are under staffed in SHU. We are + +requesting that SHU operations are halted or curtailed when it is understaffed meaning all of the post are not filled in SHU. Operations to include showers and recreational. The minute the union is notified that a staff member is instructed by a management official to conduct operations in SHU in violation of agency policy, the union will be reporting that management official to Office of Internal Affairs. + +MANAGEMENT: Management will assess duties and responsibilities as appropriate in SHU. + +Institutional Supplements: (TABLED) + +MANAGEMENT: Management states they have been pending for several years and the union is pending review that are not policy driven which needs warden signature and dates. + +UNION: The union states we needed official time for several union members to work on the supplements. Our requests for official time have gone unanswered. The union will provide a list of union members and number of hours needed for review of Institutional Supplements on September 26, 2019. + +\*\*The following agenda items below were not discussed in this meeting\*\* + +Communication with employees on extended leave: + +New Managers and Local Agreements, Past Practice(s): + +Staff Housing: + +Staff Facilities + +Honoring of Old LMR Agreements: + +Overtime Hiring at MCC New York: + +Lieutenant Medina: + +Opening Old Agenda Items: + +Responses to Union Inquiries: + +T&A agreement: + +Next LMR meeting is scheduled for September 26, 2019 at 9:00 a.m. + +*[Handwritten signature of UNION Local 31#8]* +UNION/Local 31#8 + +*[Handwritten signature of MCC New York Management]* +MCC New York Management + +*[Vertical text on the left margin, likely a secondary notice or document containing a date or description of the document its content.]* \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845852/EFTA02845852.metadata.json b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845852/EFTA02845852.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8595b7502d4a2e311fba057030d565538c2a03e5 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845852/EFTA02845852.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,2681 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845852.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 38, + "chars": 60559, + "elapsed_seconds": 15.68, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_22_Picture_1.jpeg", + "_page_26_Picture_1.jpeg", + "_page_35_Picture_1.jpeg", + "_page_35_Picture_19.jpeg", + "_page_35_Picture_20.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 72.828, + 42.12 + ], + [ + 282.13200000000006, + 42.12 + ], + [ + 282.13200000000006, + 70.353515625 + ], + [ + 72.828, + 70.353515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MOTION OF MICHAEL TO \nCOMPEL DISCOVERY", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 199.512, + 233.27999999999997 + ], + [ + 412.94952392578125, + 233.27999999999997 + ], + [ + 412.94952392578125, + 261.63 + ], + [ + 199.512, + 261.63 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "TABLE OF CONTENTS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 245.41000366210938, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 371.6828918457031, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 371.6828918457031, + 96.9735107421875 + ], + [ + 245.41000366210938, + 96.9735107421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "TABLE OF AUTHORITIES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 235.2899932861328, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 380.052, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 380.052, + 94.33349609375 + ], + [ + 235.2899932861328, + 94.33349609375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CASES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 83.62000274658203, + 106.11000000000001 + ], + [ + 124.848, + 106.11000000000001 + ], + [ + 124.848, + 120.593505859375 + ], + [ + 83.62000274658203, + 120.593505859375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "RULES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 84.77999877929688, + 91.53 + ], + [ + 127.90799999999999, + 91.53 + ], + [ + 127.90799999999999, + 106.43701171875 + ], + [ + 84.77999877929688, + 106.43701171875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 84.63999938964844, + 68.03999999999999 + ], + [ + 283.968, + 68.03999999999999 + ], + [ + 283.968, + 94.7235107421875 + ], + [ + 84.63999938964844, + 94.7235107421875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MOTION OF MICHA O COMPEL", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 143.82, + 250.52532958984375 + ], + [ + 471.24, + 250.52532958984375 + ], + [ + 471.24, + 266.75091552734375 + ], + [ + 143.82, + 266.75091552734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "INTRODUCTION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 262.548, + 278.64 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 278.64 + ], + [ + 353.124, + 291.9735412597656 + ], + [ + 262.548, + 291.9735412597656 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "BACKGROUND", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 264.97003173828125, + 68.290283203125 + ], + [ + 350.06399999999996, + 68.290283203125 + ], + [ + 350.06399999999996, + 81.81 + ], + [ + 264.97003173828125, + 81.81 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A. The Indictment Alleges that Mr.= Conspired with Co-Defendant, \n21._To_el, and Created False Records", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 118.72800000000001, + 94.77000000000001 + ], + [ + 485.928, + 94.77000000000001 + ], + [ + 485.928, + 121.343505859375 + ], + [ + 118.72800000000001, + 121.343505859375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B. Mr. ' Rule 16 and Brady-Giglio Requests for Production \nof Documents Have Been Denied", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 115.05599999999998, + 504.63 + ], + [ + 450.432, + 504.63 + ], + [ + 450.432, + 533.1035461425781 + ], + [ + 115.05599999999998, + 533.1035461425781 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "D. The Information Sought by This Motion,", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 115.66799999999999, + 412.29 + ], + [ + 342.0363464355469, + 412.29 + ], + [ + 342.0363464355469, + 427.3435363769531 + ], + [ + 115.66799999999999, + 427.3435363769531 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ARGUMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 273.95001220703125, + 68.30810546875 + ], + [ + 342.10800000000006, + 68.30810546875 + ], + [ + 342.10800000000006, + 81.81 + ], + [ + 273.95001220703125, + 81.81 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B. Rule 16 and Brady-Giglio Include the Production of Documents and \nReports Generated by Other Agencies", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 118.116, + 268.92 + ], + [ + 469.404, + 268.92 + ], + [ + 469.404, + 297.97357177734375 + ], + [ + 118.116, + 297.97357177734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "C. The Reports and Documents Requested Are Discoverable Under Brady", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 17, + "polygon": [ + [ + 116.6300048828125, + 439.83000000000004 + ], + [ + 481.032, + 439.83000000000004 + ], + [ + 481.032, + 454.4100000000001 + ], + [ + 116.6300048828125, + 454.4100000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CONCLUSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 268.668, + 230.03999999999996 + ], + [ + 348.3946228027344, + 230.03999999999996 + ], + [ + 348.3946228027344, + 245.103515625 + ], + [ + 268.668, + 245.103515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 20, + "polygon": [ + [ + 230.5999755859375, + 82.1781005859375 + ], + [ + 386.784, + 82.1781005859375 + ], + [ + 386.784, + 96.593505859375 + ], + [ + 230.5999755859375, + 96.593505859375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT A", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 21, + "polygon": [ + [ + 236.232, + 95.58 + ], + [ + 387.5086975097656, + 95.58 + ], + [ + 387.5086975097656, + 126.57110595703125 + ], + [ + 236.232, + 126.57110595703125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "The Law Offices of \nMONTELL FIGGINS 1-1-0", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 22, + "polygon": [ + [ + 173.19599999999997, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 500.0039999999999, + 81.0 + ], + [ + 500.0039999999999, + 133.04888916015625 + ], + [ + 173.19599999999997, + 133.04888916015625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 22, + "polygon": [ + [ + 92.41199999999999, + 242.18999999999997 + ], + [ + 143.20800000000003, + 242.18999999999997 + ], + [ + 143.20800000000003, + 251.91 + ], + [ + 92.41199999999999, + 251.91 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SENT VIA. EMAIL", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 22, + "polygon": [ + [ + 92.41199999999999, + 311.85 + ], + [ + 189.88067626953125, + 311.85 + ], + [ + 189.88067626953125, + 326.4505615234375 + ], + [ + 92.41199999999999, + 326.4505615234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT B", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 23, + "polygon": [ + [ + 237.45600000000002, + 93.96000000000001 + ], + [ + 388.74468994140625, + 93.96000000000001 + ], + [ + 388.74468994140625, + 124.39678955078125 + ], + [ + 237.45600000000002, + 124.39678955078125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "\"PROTECTED MATERIAL\"", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 24, + "polygon": [ + [ + 137.088, + 79.38 + ], + [ + 482.94549560546875, + 79.38 + ], + [ + 482.94549560546875, + 107.87890625 + ], + [ + 137.088, + 107.87890625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT C", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 25, + "polygon": [ + [ + 237.45600000000002, + 92.34 + ], + [ + 387.6087951660156, + 92.34 + ], + [ + 387.6087951660156, + 123.07110595703125 + ], + [ + 237.45600000000002, + 123.07110595703125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "United States Department of Justice \nOffice of the Inspector General", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 26, + "polygon": [ + [ + 182.37599999999998, + 75.33 + ], + [ + 458.97222900390625, + 75.33 + ], + [ + 458.97222900390625, + 115.83 + ], + [ + 182.37599999999998, + 115.83 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Consent to Search Computer/Electronic Equipment", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 26, + "polygon": [ + [ + 175.03199999999998, + 128.79 + ], + [ + 468.496826171875, + 128.79 + ], + [ + 468.496826171875, + 150.66 + ], + [ + 175.03199999999998, + 150.66 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT D", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 27, + "polygon": [ + [ + 236.232, + 93.15 + ], + [ + 387.1116638183594, + 93.15 + ], + [ + 387.1116638183594, + 123.7249755859375 + ], + [ + 236.232, + 123.7249755859375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Barr announces DOJ inspector general \ninvestigation into Epstein death", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 28, + "polygon": [ + [ + 52.019999999999996, + 100.44 + ], + [ + 453.2685241699219, + 100.44 + ], + [ + 453.2685241699219, + 159.31756591796875 + ], + [ + 52.019999999999996, + 159.31756591796875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT E", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 31, + "polygon": [ + [ + 215.42399999999998, + 93.15 + ], + [ + 368.33709716796875, + 93.15 + ], + [ + 368.33709716796875, + 125.10345458984375 + ], + [ + 215.42399999999998, + 125.10345458984375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Lack of Staff and Resources Continue to Strain the Federal Bureau of Prisons", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 32, + "polygon": [ + [ + 49.572, + 268.92 + ], + [ + 570.9960000000001, + 268.92 + ], + [ + 570.9960000000001, + 304.56 + ], + [ + 49.572, + 304.56 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Lack of Staff and Resources Continue to Strain the Federal Bureau of Prisons - Oversight - Government Executive", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 33, + "polygon": [ + [ + 184.212, + 195.20999999999998 + ], + [ + 475.524, + 195.20999999999998 + ], + [ + 475.524, + 205.74 + ], + [ + 184.212, + 205.74 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EXHIBIT F", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 34, + "polygon": [ + [ + 236.84400000000002, + 93.96000000000001 + ], + [ + 384.99945068359375, + 93.96000000000001 + ], + [ + 384.99945068359375, + 124.98394775390625 + ], + [ + 236.84400000000002, + 124.98394775390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "U.S. DEPHAREMENDOF JUSTICE", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 35, + "polygon": [ + [ + 320.076, + 134.46 + ], + [ + 477.2240295410156, + 134.46 + ], + [ + 477.2240295410156, + 147.20318603515625 + ], + [ + 320.076, + 147.20318603515625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Settled Arbitration Cases: (TABLED)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 35, + "polygon": [ + [ + 111.384, + 626.94 + ], + [ + 285.29144287109375, + 626.94 + ], + [ + 285.29144287109375, + 640.7315521240234 + ], + [ + 111.384, + 640.7315521240234 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cross counting of housing units: (TABLED)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 36, + "polygon": [ + [ + 103.90573120117188, + 119.88 + ], + [ + 300.492, + 119.88 + ], + [ + 300.492, + 133.3038330078125 + ], + [ + 103.90573120117188, + 133.3038330078125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Lunch Reliefs: (TABLED)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 36, + "polygon": [ + [ + 104.03999999999999, + 191.96999999999997 + ], + [ + 223.99200000000002, + 191.96999999999997 + ], + [ + 223.99200000000002, + 204.12 + ], + [ + 104.03999999999999, + 204.12 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Ouarterly Roster: (CLOSED)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 36, + "polygon": [ + [ + 104.03999999999999, + 216.27 + ], + [ + 238.68, + 216.27 + ], + [ + 238.68, + 228.7926025390625 + ], + [ + 104.03999999999999, + 228.7926025390625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Non-Uniform staff attire: (TABLED)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 36, + "polygon": [ + [ + 104.03999999999999, + 226.8 + ], + [ + 271.116, + 226.8 + ], + [ + 271.116, + 239.76 + ], + [ + 104.03999999999999, + 239.76 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "New Agenda Items:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 36, + "polygon": [ + [ + 104.03999999999999, + 263.25 + ], + [ + 194.00400000000002, + 263.25 + ], + [ + 194.00400000000002, + 276.87518310546875 + ], + [ + 104.03999999999999, + 276.87518310546875 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Correctional Services Annual Leave Schedule: (TABLED)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 36, + "polygon": [ + [ + 104.03999999999999, + 297.27 + ], + [ + 364.45635986328125, + 297.27 + ], + [ + 364.45635986328125, + 311.04 + ], + [ + 104.03999999999999, + 311.04 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Augmentation: (TABLED)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 36, + "polygon": [ + [ + 104.03999999999999, + 415.53 + ], + [ + 228.7727508544922, + 415.53 + ], + [ + 228.7727508544922, + 429.2671203613281 + ], + [ + 104.03999999999999, + 429.2671203613281 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Under Staffing in SEW:,(TABLED)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 36, + "polygon": [ + [ + 104.03999999999999, + 618.84 + ], + [ + 270.5590515136719, + 618.84 + ], + [ + 270.5590515136719, + 632.41552734375 + ], + [ + 104.03999999999999, + 632.41552734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Institutional Supplements: (TABLED)", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 108.93599999999999, + 225.18 + ], + [ + 281.52, + 225.18 + ], + [ + 281.52, + 238.95 + ], + [ + 108.93599999999999, + 238.95 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Communication with employees on extended leave:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 108.32399999999998, + 366.93 + ], + [ + 335.98800000000006, + 366.93 + ], + [ + 335.98800000000006, + 380.7 + ], + [ + 108.32399999999998, + 380.7 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "New Managers and Local Agreements, Past Practice(s):", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 108.32399999999998, + 389.61 + ], + [ + 356.79599999999994, + 389.61 + ], + [ + 356.79599999999994, + 403.38 + ], + [ + 108.32399999999998, + 403.38 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Staff Housing:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 108.32399999999998, + 413.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 175.64399999999998, + 413.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 175.64399999999998, + 426.06000000000006 + ], + [ + 108.32399999999998, + 426.06000000000006 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Staff Facilities", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 108.32399999999998, + 438.21000000000004 + ], + [ + 175.64399999999998, + 438.21000000000004 + ], + [ + 175.64399999999998, + 451.1700000000001 + ], + [ + 108.32399999999998, + 451.1700000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Honoring of Old LMR Agreements:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 108.32399999999998, + 460.89 + ], + [ + 271.116, + 460.89 + ], + [ + 271.116, + 474.65999999999997 + ], + [ + 108.32399999999998, + 474.65999999999997 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Overtime Hiring at MCC New York:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 108.32399999999998, + 484.37999999999994 + ], + [ + 276.624, + 484.37999999999994 + ], + [ + 276.624, + 498.15000000000003 + ], + [ + 108.32399999999998, + 498.15000000000003 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Lieutenant Medina:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 108.32399999999998, + 508.68 + ], + [ + 201.348, + 508.68 + ], + [ + 201.348, + 521.64 + ], + [ + 108.32399999999998, + 521.64 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Opening Old Agenda Items:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 108.32399999999998, + 532.98 + ], + [ + 238.06800000000004, + 532.98 + ], + [ + 238.06800000000004, + 545.94 + ], + [ + 108.32399999999998, + 545.94 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Responses to Union Inquiries:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 108.32399999999998, + 556.47 + ], + [ + 246.63600000000002, + 556.47 + ], + [ + 246.63600000000002, + 569.4300000000001 + ], + [ + 108.32399999999998, + 569.4300000000001 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "T&A agreement:", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 37, + "polygon": [ + [ + 108.32399999999998, + 581.5799999999999 + ], + [ + 189.72, + 581.5799999999999 + ], + [ + 189.72, + 593.73 + ], + [ + 108.32399999999998, + 593.73 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 45 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "TableOfContents", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "TableOfContents", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 15 + ], + [ + "Line", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "TableOfContents", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 58 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 70 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 57 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 37 + ], + [ + "Line", + 19 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Line", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 79 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Line", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 5 + ], + [ + "Line", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Line", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 476 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Line", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 30, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 43 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 31, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 6 + ], + [ + "Line", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 32, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 28 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 33, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 34, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Line", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 35, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 219 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 36, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 456 + ], + [ + "Line", + 39 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 37, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 289 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02845852" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845852/_page_22_Picture_1.jpeg b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845852/_page_22_Picture_1.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e6dd6356df9482edcefe8bd3eb3ccee4002adbc6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845852/_page_22_Picture_1.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:561e5972645fb8ac371b615ebc13fa8639d9dd9c3e05ac962bab519ed5baae83 +size 3561 diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845852/_page_26_Picture_1.jpeg b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845852/_page_26_Picture_1.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..41443a49b4523e9685db60bd8472b469991ef9f1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845852/_page_26_Picture_1.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:6697f089bfceb572d141383cf7d78508bab85550bf8af15b65237b30fed1898e +size 6361 diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845852/_page_35_Picture_1.jpeg b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845852/_page_35_Picture_1.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ce48312cfc3e7f32f85d72fc144a6eb8878fbc9f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845852/_page_35_Picture_1.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:cc74f13a3b65849bcfbff4e9e2a38ef092550eb27c0900a3b83edf97e80869fe +size 9317 diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845852/_page_35_Picture_19.jpeg b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845852/_page_35_Picture_19.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..c7cd715fdba37c709042ef3703da67227c2fe8e9 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845852/_page_35_Picture_19.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:5fdfc3bbdfde384a8cd957faa403498cc415294177aaf9e20d684513b6ea5e4c +size 1806 diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845852/_page_35_Picture_20.jpeg b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845852/_page_35_Picture_20.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..12b36073fffdefa61287ba9c8567d41ff9f0a500 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845852/_page_35_Picture_20.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:d26cb740e6debf611fae9a8a352ec8c8278817380f87dbdc6e1f4fbaef6a3e43 +size 2450 diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845890/EFTA02845890.md b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845890/EFTA02845890.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0d9bb75ca53432730094d9ccebd14947f0b522dd --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845890/EFTA02845890.md @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA + +-against- + +TOVA NOEL and MICHAEL + +Defendants. + +ANALISA District Judge: + +USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: 4/22/2020 + +19 Cr. 830 (AT) + +## ORDER + +The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has necessitated substantial changes in the Court's trial schedule in order to ensure that jury trials can be conducted safely and practically. Moreover, on April 20, 2020, the Honorable Colleen McMahon, Chief Judge, ordered that "the conduct of jury trials in this district be and hereby is suspended until further order of the court." In re: Coronayirus/COVID-I9 Pandemic (Suspension of hay Trials as a Result of Covid-I9 and the Limitation of Court Operations), 20 Misc. 197, ECF No. 1 at 2 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 20, 2020). The Chief Judge further ordered that time be excluded for all criminal trials under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7XA), from April 27, 2020 to June 15, 2020, noting that "[t]he [cloud may further extend the period of exclusion as circumstances may warrant." In re: Coronavints/COVID-19 Pandemic (Extension of Time Under the Speedy Trial Act), 20 Misc. 196, ECF No. 1 1 6 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 20, 2020). Accordingly, the trial in this action scheduled to commence on June 22, 2020, is ADJOURNED to January 4, 2021. + +It is ORDERED that the time between June 22, 2020 and January 4, 2021 is excluded under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(hX7)(A), in the interests of justice. The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting the exclusion outweigh the best interests of the public and Defendants in a speedy trial, because such an extension is necessary to efficiently administer the Court's docket consistent with public safety, and because it will allow the parties to prepare for trial and to discuss potential pretrial disposition. + +It is further ORDERED that the parties shall appear for a status conference on September 9, 2020, at 1:00 p.m., in Courtroom 15D of the United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York. + +SO ORDERED. + +Dated: April 22, 2020 New York, New York + +ANALISA United States District Judge \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845890/EFTA02845890.metadata.json b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845890/EFTA02845890.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5ae7848ff4a07def412ffa7b763c432332f194ff --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845890/EFTA02845890.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,109 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845890.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 2157, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.73, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK \nUNITED STATES OF AMERICA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 62.37 + ], + [ + 281.8328552246094, + 62.37 + ], + [ + 281.8328552246094, + 105.363037109375 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 105.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 441.8639999999999, + 162.0 + ], + [ + 492.3381042480469, + 162.0 + ], + [ + 492.3381042480469, + 176.60302734375 + ], + [ + 441.8639999999999, + 176.60302734375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 86 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02845890" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845891/EFTA02845891.md b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845891/EFTA02845891.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..444b60bbe9c48b24fcf429e3699dd84605658062 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845891/EFTA02845891.md @@ -0,0 +1,333 @@ +### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK + +x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA TOVA NOEL and MICHAEL Defendants. x + +19 Cr. 830 (AT) + +### MEMORANDUM OF LAW OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT MICHAEL MOTION TO COMPEL + +GEOFFREY S. BERMAN United States Attorney Southern District of New York + +Rebekah Donaleski Jessica Lonergan Nicolas Roos Assistant United States Attorneys - Of Counsel - + +#### TABLE OF CONTENTS + +| PRELIMINARY STATEMENT | 1 | +|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------| +| STATEMENT OF FACTS | 2 | +| I. The Indictment | 2 | +| II. Pretrial Discovery and the Defendant's Request for Additional Materials | 3 | +| A. The Government's Discovery Production | 3 | +| B. Defense Requests for Additional Discovery Materials | 4 | +| ARGUMENT | 7 | +| I. Applicable Law | 7 | +| A. Brady & Giglio | 7 | +| B. Rule 16 | 8 | +| is Not Entitled to Additional Materials | 8 | +| A. The Government Has Satisfied its Discovery and Disclosure Obligations | 8 | +| B. The Requested Records Are Not "Material" to Preparing a Defense and Are | | +| Sought for the Impermissible Purpose of Jury Nullification | 10 | +| 1 .Applicable Law | 10 | +| 2.Discussion | 12 | +| C. The Government is Not Required to Collect Materials From Agencies Who | | +| Were Not Part of the Prosecution Team | 15 | +| 1.Applicable Law | 16 | +| 2.Discussion | 19 | +| D. Any Draft Inspector General Report is Not Subject to Disclosure | 21 | +| E. | Has Not Carried His Burden With Respect to Discovery of Material in | +| Support of a Selective Prosecution Claim | 24 | +| (.Applicable Law | 24 | +| 2. Discussion | 26 | +| CONCLUSION | 29 | + +| Amnesty Intl USA v. CIA, | 728 F. Supp. 2d 479 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) | | +|--------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|-----------------------| +| Brady v. Maryland, | 373 U.S. 83 (1963) | | +| Color of Change v. United States Dept of Homeland Sec., | 325 F. Supp. 3d 447 | | +| (S.D.N.Y. 2018) | | 27 | +| Dep't of Interior v. Klamath Water Users Protective Ass'n, | 532 U.S. 1 (2001) | 26, 27 | +| Giglio v. United States, | 405 U.S. 150 (1972) | passim | +| In re Sealed Case, | 121 F.3d 729 (D.C. Cir. 1997) | 26 | +| In re Terrorist Bombings of U.S. Embassies in E. Africa, | 552 F.3d 93 (2d Cir. 2008) | 15 | +| Kyles v. Whitley, | 514 U.S. 419 (1995) | 19 | +| N.L.R.B. v. Sears, Roebuck & | Co., 421 U.S. 132 (1975) | 26 | +| Nat'! Res. Def Council v. United States Envtl. Prot. Agency, | | 954 F.3d 150 (2d Cir. | +| 2020) | | 26 | +| Standefer v. United States, | 447 U.S. 10 (1980) | 13 | +| United States v. Alameh, | 341 F.3d 167 (2d Cir. 2003) | 29, 30, 31 | +| United States v. | Armstrong, 517 U.S. 456, (1996) | passim | +| United States v. Avellino, | 136 F.3d 249 (2d Cir. 1998) | 19, 25 | +| United States v. Bagley, | 473 U.S. 667 (1985) | 7 | +| United States v. Barcelo, | 628 F. App'x 36 (2d Cir. 2015) | 19 | +| United States v. Bass, | 536 U.S. 862 (2002) | 30, 33 | +| United States v. Berrios, | 501 F.2d 1207 (2d Cir. 1974) | 30, 31 | +| United States v. Blaszczak, | 308 F. Supp. 3d 736 (S.D.N.Y. 2018) | 20 | +| United States v. | Bryan, 868 F.2d 1032 (9th Cir. 1989) | 24 | +| United States v. Carr, | 424 F.3d 213 (2d Cir. 2005) | 12 | +| United States v. | 409 F. Supp. 3d 228 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) | 20 | + +### Cases + +| | 7, 8 | +|------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------| +| Jan. 31, 2011) | 12, 17 | +| May 12, 2015) | 16 | +| United States v. 101 F.3d 17 (2d Cir. 1996) | 13 | +| United States v. Fares, 978 F.2d 52 (2d Cir. 1992) | 30, 31, 33 | +| United States v. Fernandez, 231 F.3d 1240 (9th Cir. 2000) | 26 | +| United States v. Finnerty, 411 F. Supp. 2d 428 (S.D.N.Y. 2006) | 20 | +| July 7, 1999) | 16 | +| United States v.MI, 8 F. Supp. 2d 253 (S.D.N.Y. 1998) United States v. | 26 | +| 786 F. Supp. 56 (D.D.C. 1992) | 15 | +| United States v. Ghailani, 687 F. Supp. 2d 365 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) | 21 | +| United States v. Gibbons, 602 F.2d 1044 (2d Cir. 1979) | 16 | +| United States v. | No. 19 Cr. 123-2 (NRB), 2020 WL 1809293, at *5 | +| (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 9, 2020) | 10 | +| United States v. LeRoy, 687 F.24 610 (2d Cir. 1982) | 7 | +| Jan. 25, 2016) | 13, 16 | +| United States v. M, 35 F.3d 148 (4th Cir. 1994) | 28 | +| United States v. M, 517 F.3d 20 (1st Cir. 2008) | 32 | +| United States v. Libby, 429 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2006) | 24 | +| United States v. Manzano, 945 F.3d 616 (2d Cir. 2019) | 13, 17 | +| United States v. McGuinness, 764 F. Supp. 888 (S.D.N.Y. 1991) | 11 | +| (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 17, 2018) | 20, 22 | +| United States v. Moon, 718 F.2d 1210 (2d Cir. 1983) | 30, 33 | + +| United States v. Payne, 63 F.3d 1200 (2d Cir. 1995) | 8 | +|----------------------------------------------------------------|--------| +| United States v. Pelullo, 399 F.3d 197 (3d Cir. 2005) | 21 | +| United States v. 940 F. Supp. 540 (S.D.N.Y. 1996) | 10 | +| United States v. Persico, 645 F.3d 85 (2d Cir. 2011) | 8 | +| United States v. Reese, 933 F. Supp. 2d 579 (S.D.N.Y. 2013) | 13, 16 | +| United States v. Rigas, 258 F. Supp. 2d 299 (S.D.N.Y. 2003) | 11, 12 | +| United States v. Rigas, 583 F.3d 108 (2d Cir. 2009) | 20 | +| United States v. Rosado, 728 F.2d 89 (2d Cir. 1984) | 17 | +| United States v. Rosenfield, 469 F.2d 598 (3d Cir. 1972) | 15 | +| United States v. Ruggiero, 472 F.2d 599 (2d Cir. 1973) | 7 | +| United States v. Sanders, 17 F. Supp. 2d 141 (E.D.N.Y. 1998) | 29 | +| United States v. Southland Corp., 760 F.2d 1366 (2d Cir. 1985) | 15 | +| United States v. M, 424 F. Supp. 2d 720 (S.D.N.Y. 2006) | 21 | +| United States v. Stevens, 985 F.2d 1175 (2d Cir. 1993) | 9, 12 | +| United States v. M, 116 F.3d 606 (2d Cir. 1997) | 12 | +| (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 21, 2005) | 10 | +| United States v. Upton, 856 F. Supp. 727 (E.D.N.Y. 1994) | 21 | +| United States v. Volpe, 42 F. Supp. 2d 204 (E.D.N.Y. 1999) | 24 | +| United States v. Washington, 705 F.2d 489 (D.C. Cir. 1983) | 14, 15 | +| United States v. 972 F.2d 16 (2d Cir. 1992) | 33 | +| United States v. Yousef, 327 F.3d 56 (2d Cir. 2003) | 19 | + +#### PRELIMINARY STATEMENT + +The Government respectfully submits this memorandum of law in opposition to defendant Michael motion to compel discovery. (Dkt. No. 33) ("Mot."). seeks an order compelling the Government to collect materials that are not in its possession, not discoverable under any legal basis, and not related to any legally cognizable defense. motion is entirely without merit and should be denied.' + +concedes that the Government has produced a "multitude" of discovery directly relevant to the charges against him. (Mot. 6). Nonetheless, he seeks an order compelling the Government to collect and produce additional materials that he believes would support his purported defenses, namely, that he committed the offenses because of staffing issues and supervisory lapses, and that he was singled out for prosecution. Specifically, seeks: (i) a copy of a report being prepared by the Department of Justice, Office of the Inspector General ("DOJ-OIG"), which does not yet exist and would principally be based on the same primary materials that the Government produced to in December 2019 (Mot. 5, 8-9); (ii) reports and documents prepared by the Bureau of Prisons ("BOP") and other agencies who were not and are not members of the prosecution team (Mot. 6-7); (iii) reports and documents related to "any and all [Metropolitan Correctional Center ("MCC")) employees" who have engaged in "the same or similar conduct," including an incident in "2005 or 2006" where officers failed to conduct counts or rounds and an inmate committed suicide (Mot. 6); and (iv) reports, statistics, and documents related to purported staffing issues, supervisory lapses, and the application of BOP + +1 Tova Noel did not file any pretrial motions, and has not joined in pretrial motions. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 12(c)(3) ("If a party does not meet the deadline for making a Rule 12(b)(3) motion, the motion is untimely. But a court may consider the defense, objection, or request if the party shows good cause."). + +policies which relate to the "much larger context" at the BOP (Mot. 6, 7, 9, 10). + +As an initial matter, the Government has satisfied its Rule 16, Brady, and Giglio obligations and is not in possession of the additional materials that seeks. More importantly, is not entitled to compel the Government to collect the additional records for at least four separate reasons. First, the records are not "material" to preparing a defense because they are wholly irrelevant to the false statement charges against and are intended to prompt jurors to nullify the charges against him. Second, the BOP records seeks are not in the "possession" of the prosecution team, and there is no legal basis for compelling the Government to collect materials from other agencies or components of the Department of Justice who are not and were not part of the criminal investigation that led to the charges against Third, there is no legal basis to require the Government to produce a draft of the report being prepared by the Dal- (JIG, which is subject to the deliberative process privilege. Fourth, is not entitled to discovery relating to what happened to other MCC employees when they "falsiflied) the same documents," (Mot. 6), because he has utterly failed to identify evidence that the decision to prosecute him had a discriminatory effect and was motivated by a discriminatory purpose. motion should be denied in all respects. + +## STATEMENT OF FACTS + +### I. The Indictment + +Indictment 19 Cr. 830 (AT) (the "Indictment") was filed on November 19, 2019, charging defendants Tova Noel and Michael in six counts: (i) conspiring to defraud the United States and to make or use a false writing or document, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 371 (Count One); and (ii) five counts of making or using a false writing or document, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1001(a)(3) and 3 (Counts Two through Six). Both defendants are charged in Counts One, Four, Five, and Six; defendant Noel only is charged in Counts Two and Three. The charges in the Indictment stem from a fourteen-hour time period, from approximately 4:00 p.m. on August 9, 2019 to approximately 6:30 a.m. the following day, August 10, 2019, when the defendants were working as correctional officers at the MCC. As charged in the Indictment, during that time period, the defendants failed to perform mandated counts of prisoners housed in MCC's Special Housing Unit ("SHU"), but nevertheless signed false certifications attesting to having conducted those counts, when, in fact, no counts or rounds of the SHU were conducted from approximately 10:30 p.m. on August 9 to 6:30 a.m. on August 10. + +# II. Pretrial Discovery and the Defendants' Request for Additional Materials + +## A. The Government's Discovery Production + +At the initial pretrial conference on November 25, 2019, the Court set a discovery deadline of December 31, 2019. On that date, pursuant to a protective order entered by the Court, the Government made a substantial discovery production to both defendants, consisting in part of the following: surveillance video for the common area of the SHU; analysis of the computers used by Noel and from August 9 to 10, 2019; count slips and thirty-minute round reports; MCC phone records; personnel records and prior work schedules; and reports and notes of witness interviews prepared by agents from the Federal Bureau of Investigation ("FBI") and the DOJ-OIG who were participating in the investigation.2 + +Subsequently, the Government made three additional discovery productions, much more limited in scope. On January 23, 2020, the Government produced additional interview reports and + +2 The Government does not concede that production of all of the materials was required under Rule 16, but nonetheless produced the materials in its possession out of an abundance of caution. + +notes. On January 30, 2020,3 the Government reproduced video surveillance footage with timestamps, and on March 16, 2020, the Government produced forensic reports for three electronic devices and a photograph of a text message. + +## B. Defense Requests for Additional Discovery Materials + +The defendants have made a number of requests for additional discovery materials, in response to which the Government has provided information in its possession as consistent with Rule 16 and its other disclosure obligations, as described below. + +At the initial pretrial conference on November 11, 2019, M, through counsel, raised the issue of an "ongoing . . . report" by the Office of the Inspector General and requested the "status" of the report and when it would be completed.4 (Conf. Tr., Nov. 25, 2019, at 3-4, 7-9). In response, the Government explained that "to the extent counsel's asking for a summary of the results of the criminal investigation, obviously we'll be turning over in discovery all of the underlying results of the criminal investigation. . . . I don't have a time frame on the [I]nspector [general report, but the [government will produce to the defense all of the relevant discovery materials in this matter, which includes the Rule 16 materials relevant to the criminal charges that have been brought against the defendants." (Id. at 7-8). As there was no pending issue to resolve, the Court declined to rule at that time. + +On January 29, 2020, and Noel each submitted discovery requests to the Government. letter reiterated his prior request for "any and all reports, memorandums, + +3 The January 30, 2020 production was made to Noel's counsel on January 24, 2020, while the Government was still waiting for an additional hard drive from counsel. + +4 Based on conversations with attorneys at DOJ-OIG tasked with preparing this report, the Government understands that the report will likely focus on the events surrounding the death of Jeffrey Epstein and BOP policies and procedures. + +written statements, photos, videos, and incident reports created, manufactured or possessed by the United States Inspector General." Noel's January 29 letter sought materials related to the MCC video surveillance system and additional surveillance video, as well as assistance locating particular information in the surveillance video footage that the Government had previously produced in discovery. + +At the pretrial conference the following day, EMI, through counsel, renewed his request for "whatever investigation was done and whatever information there is that is discoverable with respect to the Inspector General's report." (Conf. Tr., Jan. 30, 2020, at 6, 9). The Court directed to file a motion formalizing his request. (Id. at 9).5 + +The Government responded to the defendants' discovery requests by letter dated March 14, 2020. As for request for materials related to any forthcoming Inspector General's report, the Government referred to its prior response as stated at the November 25, 2019 pretrial conference. With respect to Noel's requests for additional materials related to the MCC video surveillance system, the Government explained that to the extent such materials were in the Government's possession and currently subject to disclosure, they had already been produced. In addition, the Government provided additional information answering certain of Noel's questions, including video timestamps to assist with review of the surveillance footage. + +On March 27, 2020, submitted another discovery request to the Government, seeking, among other things, information from the ROF' regarding other correctional officers and information about the Government's charging decisions. The Government responded by letter + +5 a, through counsel, previewed that he would also likely file a motion to dismiss the indictment based on "selective prosecution." (Conf. Tr., Jan. 30, 2020 at 6). The deadline for filing motions, which was extended at counsel's request, has passed, and has failed to timely file a motion to dismiss. + +dated April 1, 2020, explaining that any responsive information in the Government's possession and subject to disclosure had already been produced. The letter further explained that to the extent the requests called for items not in the Government's possession or not subject to disclosure, had not identified any legal basis or authority for his requests and the Government was not aware of any authority requiring the Government to obtain or produce the requested information. + +On April 9, 2020, filed the instant motion seeking an order from the Court compelling the Government to produce the following: + +- The Inspector General's report investigating the death of Jeffrey Epstein and BOP policies and procedures (referred to herein as the "Inspector General's Report"), as well as all supporting memoranda and other documents, (Mot. 4-5); +- Any and all "reports generated by investigators within the (BOP) regarding the August 10, 2019 incident" as well as "documents, reports, witness statements and disciplinary records of any and all MCC employees who have engaged in the same or similar conduct," including "results of any disciplinary proceedings and documents maintained by the BOP regarding the discipline or administrative adjudication of any other employees who have failed to conduct rounds or inmate counts," (Mot. 4, 6); +- Any previously undisclosed reports, witness statements, and documents created by "any other federal agencies that investigated the circumstances surrounding the death of Jeffrey Epstein," (Mot. 4, 7). + +For the reasons that follow, is not entitled to the materials he seeks, and his motion should be denied. + +#### ARGUMENT + +### I. Applicable Law + +### A. Brady & Giglio + +The Government has an obligation under the Due Process Clause to make a timely disclosure of any exculpatory or impeaching evidence that is material and in its possession. See Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963); Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972); see also United States v. Coppa, 267 F.3d 132, 139-40 (2d Cir. 2001). Evidence is "material" in this sense only if "its suppression undermines confidence in the outcome of a trial." United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667, 678 (1985). "The rationale underlying Brady is not to supply a defendant with all the evidence in the Government's possession which might conceivably assist the preparation of his defense, but to assure that the defendant will not be denied access to exculpatory evidence only known to the Government." United States v. LeRoy, 687 F.2d 610, 619 (2d Cir. 1982) (citing United States v. Ruggiero, 472 F.2d 599, 604 (2d Cir. 1973)). + +Impeachment evidence is material only "where the witness at issue supplied the only evidence linking the defendant(s) to the crime, or where the likely impact on the witness's credibility would have undermined a critical element of the prosecution's case." United States v. Payne, 63 F.3d 1200, 1210 (2d Cir. 1995) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted). Similarly, "where the undisclosed evidence merely furnishes an additional basis on which to challenge a witness whose credibility has already been shown to be questionable or is subject to extensive attack by reason of other evidence, the undisclosed evidence may properly be viewed as cumulative, and hence not material." United States v. Persico, 645 F.3d 85, 111 (2d Cir. 2011) (citing cases). With regard to the timing of disclosing material under Giglio, the Second Circuit, in Coppa, rejected the argument that such material should be disclosed when defendants make a + +demand for it. 267 F.3d at 146. The court held that as a general rule, Brady and its progeny do not require immediate disclosure of all impeachment material upon a defendant's request. Id. It found that the time required for its effective use would depend on the materiality of the evidence as well as the particular circumstances of the case, and suggested that district courts may order disclosure of material it deems material as a matter of case management. Id. As described above, the Government disclosed reports and notes of witness statements as part of its discovery productions, such that the defendants will have possessed substantial material that may serve as potential impeachment evidence for one year in advance of trial. + +## B. Rule 16 + +Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure requires the Government to permit the defendants to inspect and copy documents and objects within the Government's possession, custody, or control if the items are material to preparing the defense, if the Government intends to use them in its case-in-chief at trial, or if the items were obtained from or belong to the defendant. Fed. R. Crim. P. 16(a)(1)(E). An item is "material to preparing the defense" under Rule 16 "if it could be used to counter the Government's case or bolster a defense." United States v. Stevens, 985 F.2d 1175, 1180-81 (2t1 Cir. 1993). + +# is Not Entitled to Additional Materials + +# A. The Government Has Satisfied its Discovery and Disclosure Obligations + +As an initial matter, the Government is aware of, has satisfied, and will continue to satisfy its discovery and disclosure obligations. + +The Government has met its Rule 16 discovery and disclosure obligations. As set forth above, the Government has produced an expansive amount of discovery, which includes among other things, hundreds of hours of video surveillance going back to July 5, 2019 (despite the fact that the Indictment relates to a 14-hour time period); count slips, thirty minute round forms, and staffing rosters for the three-week period surrounding Epstein's suicide; internal MCC phone records; employee files and staffing history for Noel and ; and a wide range of written Bureau of Prison policies and regulations, among other documents and materials. In addition and while not required by Rule 16, the Government produced months in advance of trial (and now, approximately a year in advance of trial) statements for all of the witnesses interviewed during the investigation. While the Government is not aware of any other information that warrants disclosure, it will produce any such materials to the extent it becomes aware of them. + +The Government is likewise aware of, and has complied with, its Brady and Giglio obligations. The Government has already produced any evidence in its possession that is arguably exculpatory or impeaching. To the extent Giglio material exists in notes of witness statements or attorney proffers made on behalf of witnesses that have not already been produced, the Government intends to comply with its obligations and will make such disclosures sufficiently in advance of trial to be effectively used. Based on that representation alone, the defendant's motion should be denied. See United States v. , No. 19 Cr. 123-2 (NRB), 2020 WL 1809293, at \*5 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 9, 2020) (denying a motion to compel because the government "represented that it had complied with and would continue to comply with its Brady and Rule 16 obligations); United States v. Undenvood, No. 04 Cr. 424 (RWS), 2005 WL 927012, at \*1 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 21, 2005) ("The courts of this Circuit repeatedly have denied pretrial requests for discovery orders pursuant to Brady where the government has made such good faith representations."); United States v. M, 940 F. Supp. 540, 553 (S.D.N.Y. 1996) (denying defendant's motion to compel production of Brady based on Government's representation that it was aware of and had complied with Brady). + +#### B. The Requested Records Are Not "Material" to Preparing a Defense and Are Sought for the Impermissible Purpose of Jury Nullification + +All of the records seeks in his motion are not "material to preparing a defense" under Rule 16, and are not exculpatory under Brady, because they are irrelevant to countering the Government's false statements case or advancing a legitimate defense. Instead, seeks evidence of staffing shortages, working conditions, the implementation of BOP policies, supervisory lapses, and instances in which other BOP employees were not prosecuted so that he can engage in attempted jury nullification by arguing that those conditions "led" to the criminal conduct that he is charged with and are a reason to acquit him. (Mot. 5, 7, 9, 14). is not entitled to records—and certainly would not be entitled to introduce any such evidence at trial that would aid in that nullification effort because Rule 16 only entitles a defendant to discovery for purposes of bolstering a defense to the Government's case in chief, not the merits of the decision to prosecute. + +### 1. Applicable Law + +An item or record that the Government does not intend to use in its case-in-chief at trial is discoverable under Rule 16(a)(1)(E) only if it "is material to preparing the defense." Fed. R. Crim. P. 16(a)(1)(E). "It is [a defendant's] burden to make a prima facie showing that documents sought under Rule 16(a)(1)(E)(i) are material to preparing the defense." United States v. Rigas, 258 F. Supp. 2d 299, 307 (S.D.N.Y. 2003) (citing United States v. McGuinness, 764 F. Supp. 888, 894 (S.D.N.Y. 1991)). As noted above, an item is "material to preparing the defense" under Rule 16 "if it could be used to counter the Government's case or bolster a defense." Stevens, 985 F.2d at 1180-81. The defendant must "offer more than the conclusory allegation that the requested evidence is material." Rigas, 258 F. Supp. 2d at 307 (internal citation omitted). + +As the Supreme Court held in United States v. Armstrong, while Rule 16 authorizes + +defendants to examine records "material to the preparation of their defense against the Government's case in chief," it does not authorize discovery for defenses that do not rebut the "merits to the criminal charge itself." 517 U.S. 456, 462-63 (1996) (holding that Rule 16 does not authorize discovery relating to a selective prosecution claim). For that reason, because evidence that would be impermissibly used to encourage jury nullification does not relate to the merits of the criminal charges, it is not discoverable under Rule 16. Id.; see also United States v. Defreitas, No. 07 Cr. 543 (DLI), 2011 WL 317964, at \*10 (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 31, 2011) (rejecting discovery request related to something that is "not a defense" and has "nothing to do with the issues of whether defendants . . . committed the ... crimes charged"). Since jury nullification is "a practice whereby a juror votes in purposeful disregard of the evidence," United States v. M, 116 F.3d 606, 614 (2d Cir. 1997), or "out of compassion or compromise," Standefer v. United States, 447 U.S. 10, 22 (1980) (internal citation omitted), it is not error for a court to preclude evidence that is "not a valid defense" aimed at nullification, United States v. 101 F.3d 17, 19-20 (2d Cir. 1996). See also United States v. Reese, 933 F. Supp. 2d 579, 583-84 (S.D.N.Y. 2013) (precluding defense arguments or evidence related to "possible consequences for the defendant of conviction, jury nullification, and the Government's motive and conduct in prosecuting [defendant]"); United States v. Levin, No. 15 Cr. 101 (KBF), 2016 WL 299031, at \*12 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 25, 2016) (barring evidence "intended to elicit sympathy" and attempts to "use jury nullification as a defense" as "plainly improper"). Indeed, "trial courts have the duty to forestall or prevent jury nullification" even where the defendant or the court may "strongly disagree[] with the government's charging decisions and the attendant sentencing consequences." United States v. Manzano, 945 F.3d 616, 626-27 (2d Cir. 2019) (citations & quotation marks omitted). + +#### 2. Discussion + +motion makes clear that he intends for his principal defense at trial to be that irrespective of his guilt or innocence of the false statements charges—he should be acquitted because the MCC was understaffed, was overworked, his supervisors did not catch his crime in the moment, and falsification of count slips is rampant within the BOP. (See Mot. 3 ("staffing issues, staffing shortages, supervisory lapses and the enforcement/interpretation of BOP procedures go to the heart of his defense to the government's criminal allegations"); 9 ("Mr. will assert that the rampant staffing shortages present at the MCC in August of 2019 led to the conduct for which Mr. is now criminally charged.")). has failed to meet his burden in establishing the materiality of discovery about these topics to preparing a valid defense because the materials he seeks do not rebut the merits of the criminal charges and instead would be impermissibly used to encourage jury nullification. + +The purported reasons for decision to falsify count slips—being tired, overworked, or understaffed—are not a valid legal defense, and therefore evidence related to those issues is not relevant. Put simply, were the jury to find beyond a reasonable doubt that intentionally made materially false statements and also that did so while tired or overworked, it would still be required to convict him. See United States v. Carr, 424 F.3d 213, 221 (2d Cir. 2005) (holding that "it was proper for the district court to instruct the jury that it had a duty to find (the defendant] guilty if the government proved beyond a reasonable doubt every element of the offense with which he was charged" (internal citation omitted)). + +None of proffered excuses relate to proving or rebutting the elements of a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001(a)(3) as they do not concern whether a writing or entry was false, whether it was material to a matter within the jurisdiction of the BOP, or whether he knowingly and willfully made a false statement. Nor are those excuses relevant to whether had a criminal agreement with his co-defendant. Indeed, evidence as to a defendant's purportedly innocent motive in a false statement case is irrelevant to the question of intent. See United States v. Washington, 705 F.2d 489, 493-94 (D.C. Cir. 1983) (holding that proof of a good or innocent motive is not probative of intent where the mens ■ **is "knowingly and willfully"); In re Terrorist Bombings of U.S. Embassies in E. Africa, 552 F.3d 93, 154 n.49 (2d Cir. 2008) (citing Washington, 705 F.2d at 493, for "the irrelevance of a motive to the question of whether conduct is intentional"); United States v. 786 F. Supp. 56, 64 (D.D.C. 1992) (rejecting the defendant's "context argument" for why materials could be relevant to the crime charged).** + +**For the same reasons, "other people were doing it" is not a defense to a false statements or conspiracy charge because the conduct of other BOP employees is irrelevant to each of the foregoing elements. argues that because he was aware of incidents where BOP employees falsified records and "their conduct did not lead to their indictment or incarceration," evidence of what other BOP employees have done is relevant to his intent. (Mot. 6.) Not so. Whether believed falsifying records was illegal or was subject to criminal penalties is not relevant to the charges against him. See United States v. Southland Corp., 760 F.2d 1366, 1372 (2d Cir. 1985) ("Ignorance of the law is no defense to a charge of purposeful and intentional action."); United States v. Rosenfield, 469 F.2d 598, 601 n.2 (3d Cir. 1972) ("As long as the inexcusable intent is present, it is not necessary that the defendant know that his conduct is subject to criminal penalties."). And in any event, it would be fundamentally inappropriate, and extremely prejudicial, for the jury to consider other individuals not on trial or otherwise relevant to the conduct charged here, in evaluating the guilt or innocence of the defendant. See United States v. Gibbons, 602 F.2d 1044, 1048 (2d Cir. 1979) (approving instruction that jury was not to consider individuals who** + +were not on trial). + +efforts to garner sympathy, put the Government on trial, and deflect blame for his own criminal actions plainly sound in nullification. See Reese, 933 F. Supp. 2d at 583-84; Levin, 2016 WL 2990831, at \*12. Evidence on those points does not relate to whether the defendant committed the crimes charged, but rather is intended to elicit sympathy, compassion, or compromise from the jury. The records seeks are no more discoverable than the nullification evidence precluded in Armstrong and its progeny. See Armstrong, 517 U.S. at 462- 63 (defendant not entitled to discovery on race of other narcotics defendants to aid in selective prosecution claim); United States v. Delacruz, No. 14 Cr. 815 (KBF), 2015 WL 2211943, at \*4 (S.D.N.Y. May 12, 2015) (rejecting defendant's "demands for general information and statistics relating to the Government's use of sting operations"); United States v. Floyd, No. 99 Cr. 0234 (DAB), 1999 WL 476438, at \*2 (S.D.N.Y. July 7, 1999) (rejecting discovery request for "background data, records and investigative reports" of the New York City Police Department ("NYPD") as well as information about NYPD officers' conduct in other cases); Defreitas, 2011 WL 317964, at \*10 (rejecting discovery demands related to a "factual impossibility" defense to a conspiracy charge). It is the Court's "duty to forestall or prevent" jury nullification. Manzano, 945 F.3d at 627 (holding that "District courts have a duty to forestall or prevent [jury nullification arguments) and the district court in this case abdicated its duty by ruling that defense counsel could argue jury nullification."); see also United States v. Rosado, 728 F.2d 89, 93 (2d Cir. 1984) (criticizing trial court for inviting nullification by permitting the defendants to mount a "political defense" and stating that it was an "erroneous assumption that good motive for committing a crime is inconsistent with criminal intent"). + +In sum, much of the additional discovery seeks in his motion relates to legally + +irrelevant matters, such as what "led" him to the criminal conduct or the broader "context" in which he committed specific criminal acts. There is no basis to compel production of evidence related to those matters under Rule 16, Brady, or Giglio because they are not material and because the evidence sought is in furtherance of a transparent attempt at nullification. motion should be denied on this basis alone. + +### C. The Government is Not Required to Collect Materials From Agencies Who Were Not Part of the Prosecution Team + +asks the Court to compel the Government to produce "any reports, witness statements, memorandum, and documents from any separate investigation conducted by the BOP," "documents, reports, witness statements and disciplinary records of any and all MCC employees who have engaged in the same or similar conduct," and any previously undisclosed reports, witness statements, and documents created by "any other federal agencies that investigated the circumstances surrounding the death of Jeffrey Epstein." (Mot. 4, 7 (emphasis added)). Even if had satisfied the materiality requirement under Rule 16 or Brady with respect to these items—and he has not motion would still fail because the materials he seeks are not in the prosecution team's possession. + +The BOP is not, and never has been, part of the prosecution team. Nor did the BOP conduct an investigation jointly or in coordination with the prosecution team.° To require the Government to obtain and produce any records from the BOP from a separate investigation, as well as evidence that would support purported (and improper, for the reasons discussed in Part II.B, + +6 The defendant claims, based on a CNN article, that the U.S. Marshal Service ("USMS") conducted an investigation. The Government is unaware of such an investigation, and in any event, any such inquiry by the USMS was not conducted jointly or in coordination with the prosecution team. + +supra) defenses, is not legally required and would impose a nearly insurmountable obligation on the Government of marshaling and reviewing information and data in the possession of an entirely separate entity. + +# 1. Applicable Law + +As described above, Rule 16, Brady, and Giglio apply to materials in the Government's "possession." As a general matter, while "[a]n individual prosecutor is presumed . . . to have knowledge of all information gathered in connection with his office's investigation of the case, ... knowledge on the part of persons employed by a different office of the government does not in all instances warrant the imputation of knowledge to the prosecutor." United States v. Avellino, 136 F.3d 249, 255 (2d Cir. 1998) (citations omitted). The imposition of such "an unlimited duty on a prosecutor to inquire of other offices not working with the prosecutor's office on the case in question would inappropriately require us to adopt a monolithic view of government' that would 'condemn the prosecution of criminal cases to a state of paralysis." Id. (citation & quotation marks omitted); see also Kyles v. Whitley, 514 U.S. 419, 437 (1995) (Government's discovery and disclosure obligations extend only to information in the custody of the prosecutor or "others acting on the government's behalf in the case"). Thus, discovery and disclosure obligations only extend "information known to persons who are a part of the 'prosecution team' . . . who perform investigative duties or make strategic decisions about the prosecution of the case," including "police officers and federal agents who submit to the direction of the prosecutor and participate in the investigation." United States v. Barcelo, 628 F. App'x 36, 38 (2d Cir. 2015) (citation omitted). Brady is not a basis to compel the Government to gather information in the possession of third parties on behalf of the defense. See United States v. Yousef, 327 F.3d + +56, 112 (2d Cir. 2003) (defendants were not deprived of due process by any alleged failure of U.S. government to help them obtain cooperation from foreign authorities). + +In considering whether Rule 16 and Brady apply to records in the possession of another government agency, a prosecutor's duty extends to reviewing such evidence only where the Government conducts a "joint investigation" with that agency or branch of government. See United States v. Rigas, 583 F.3d 108 (2d Cir. 2009) (affirming district court opinion holding that there was "no joint investigation with the [Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC")]" and therefore the Government did not need to produce documents in the custody of the SEC); United States v. Blaszczak, 308 F. Supp. 3d 736, 74243 (S.D.N.Y. 2018) (holding that the Government was not obligated to review SEC material for Brady where SEC was not involved in grand jury presentation, did not attend every interview, did not review documents gathered only by prosecution, and did not develop prosecutorial strategy); United States v. Middendorf, No. 18 Cr. 36 (JPO), 2018 WL 3956494, at \*4-5 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 17, 2018) (holding that the Government was not required to conduct a search because the [Public Company Accounting Oversight Board ("PCAOB")] was not involved in witness interviews or developing prosecutorial strategy, and the SEC was not involved in the grand jury presentation, reviewing the fruits of the Government's investigation, or developing prosecutorial strategy); United States v. 409 F. Supp. 3d 228, 24142 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) (no joint investigation between Government and SEC); United States v. Finnerty, 411 F. Supp. 2d 428, 433 (S.D.N.Y. 2006) (Chin, J.) (no joint investigation between Government and New York Exchange ("NYSE")); United States v. Upton, 856 F. Supp. 727, 749-50 (E.D.N.Y. 1994) (holding that USAO and Federal Aviation Administration ("FAA") did not conduct a "joint investigation" even though the FAA provided two inspectors to assist the criminal investigation). + +Moreover, even where agents from a component of an agency are involved in an investigation, that does not render the entirety of an agency part of the prosecution team. See, e.g., United States v. M, 424 F. Supp. 2d 720, 723 (S.D.N.Y. 2006) ("While the prosecution's [Rule 16] disclosure obligation in some circumstances may extend to materials beyond the knowledge of the individual prosecutors assigned to a case, it does not extend to the collective knowledge of the entire United States government or even to the entire government agency concerned."); United States v. Pelullo, 399 F.3d 197, 218 (3d Cir. 2005) ("[T]hat other agents in the ([Department of Labor ("DOL")] participated in this investigation does not mean that the entire DOL is properly considered part of the prosecution team."); see also United States v. Locascio, 6 F.3d 924, 949 (2d Cir.1993) (refusing, for Brady purposes, to impute to AUSAs prosecuting that action with the assistance of certain FBI agents knowledge of reports prepared by FBI agents who were "uninvolved in the investigation or trial of the defendants"); but see United States v. Ghailani, 687 F. Supp. 2d 365, 372 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) (holding that, in the context of a speedy trial motion, other members of the Department of Justice who were involved in making decisions about timing and progress of the case were part of the "government" for Rule 16 purposes). + +Thus, as the foregoing precedents recognize, the factors relevant in determining whether an agency or a component of an agency are part of the prosecution team, and therefore their records are in the "possession" of the Government include whether the agency or component: "(1) participated in the prosecution's witness interviews, (2) was involved in presenting the case to the grand jury, (3) reviewed documents gathered by or shared documents with the prosecution, (4) played a role in the development of prosecutorial strategy, or (5) accompanied the prosecution to court proceedings." Middendorf, 2018 WL 3956494, at •4. + +#### 2. Discussion + +As described above, the Government has produced Brady, Giglio, and Rule 16 material in the possession of the prosecutors and agents at the United States Attorney's Office, the FBI, and the DOJ-OIG who have worked on this investigation and prosecution. seeks materials that are not in the possession of the United States Attorney's Office or the case teams at the FBI and DOJ-OIG who worked on this criminal investigation. + +seeks a variety of records from the BOP. The BOP was not a member of the prosecution team, and no employee of the BOP performed investigative duties or made strategic decisions about the prosecution of the case. Indeed, the Government obtained records from the MCC (a component of the BOP) pursuant to a grand jury subpoena to the institution and written requests to the MCC's legal department. Likewise, the Government was not involved in any internal BOP investigation into the circumstances surrounding Epstein's suicide. Notwithstanding those facts, the defendant asserts that the BOP is "allied with the prosecution" and therefore the Government's discovery and disclosure obligations extend to materials exclusively in the possession of the BOP. That argument is not only belied by the facts, but it is settled law in this Circuit that a prosecutor's duty extends to reviewing the materials in the possession, custody, or control of another agency for Brady evidence only where the Government conducts a "joint investigation" with that agency. None of the indicia of a "joint" or "allied" prosecution, as discussed in the foregoing case law, is present here. A straightforward application of those factors considered by courts in this Circuit reveals that the investigation was in no way joint: the BOP did not participate in the prosecution's witness interviews; it was not involved in presenting the case to the grand jury; no BOP employees aided in the review of documents gathered by the + +Government; the BOP was not involved in the strategic decisions; and no BOP personnel accompanied the prosecution to court proceedings. + +Moreover, even if the BOP had conducted a joint investigation with the Government into the events of August 9 and 10, 2019 (which they did not), has offered no reason to believe that most if not all of the records that he seeks—such as records of other instances of BOP employees failing to conduct rounds and counts—would be part of the BOP's investigation. There is simply no basis to seek an order compelling the Government to search for records in the possession of the BOP, without any temporal limitation or factual nexus to the charged case, regarding staffing shortages at the MCC, other instances where BOP employees failed to conduct required rounds and counts, and disciplinary records for other BOP employees who have at other times also allegedly falsified records. + +The cases cites do not support a contrary result. In United States v. Bryan, the Ninth Circuit concluded that the government could not limit its discovery obligations to documents located in the district of prosecution since the case came out of a single, nationwide IRS investigation. 868 F.2d 1032, 1035-37 (9th Cir. 1989). In reaching that holding, the Circuit explained that "a federal prosecutor need not comb the files of every federal agency which might have documents regarding the defendant" and that Rule 16's disclosure requirements are cabined to anything in the possession "of any federal agency participating in the same investigation of the defendant." Id. at 1036 (emphasis added). Similarly, in United States v. Volpe, 42 F. Supp. 2d 204, 221 (E.D.N.Y. 1999), the court explained, in denying the defendant's discovery motion, that "[cjourts have construed the term 'government' . . . narrowly to mean the prosecutors in the particular case or the governmental agencies jointly involved in the prosecution of the defendant, and not the 'government' in general." And while the court in United States v. Libby, 429 F. Supp. 2d 1, 9 (D.D.C. 2006), required the prosecutors to obtain records from the Office of the Vice President and the Central Intelligence Agency, even though those parts of government did not participate in the grand jury investigation, that holding was an outlier, which has never been cited by another court, and the decision itself has never been cited in this Circuit. + +Finally, even if such materials had any conceivable relevance to the charges at hand (which, as discussed above, they do not), asking the Government to conduct a broad canvassing of the GOP's records—including searching databases located out of state, reviewing large quantities of documents, attempting to pull archived records going back as far as 2005, and parsing through attorney work product—would be inordinately time consuming and burdensome for attorneys for the Government, which does not have custody of the files, is not familiar with the files, and knows of no effective way to search them. It would, as the Circuit warned against in Avellino, "condemn the prosecution of criminal cases to a state of paralysis." 136 F.3d at 255. Such a result is not legally required by Rule 16, Brady, or Giglio, and therefore motion should be denied. + +# D. Any Draft Inspector General Report is Not Subject to Disclosure + +argues that any report by the Inspector General and related materials must be produced because he speculates that such a report will address systemic issues at the BOP, including purported staffing shortages at the MCC. (Mot. 5, 9-10). For the masons set forth above, any draft Inspector General Report is not discoverable because the issues believes it will discuss are not material to the preparation of a valid defense, see Part II.B, and the draft reports, to the extent they exist, are protected from disclosure by the deliberative process privilege. While the prosecution team has had no involvement in writing the Inspector General Report, the Government understands that those attorneys from DOJ-OIG responsible for writing the Report have not yet completed a draft, and do not anticipate completing the Report in the near term. As such, there are no drafts of the Report to disclose, and motion can be denied on that reason alone. Moreover, request for draft versions of the Report—which do not yet exist—fails for two additional reasons. + +First, drafts of the Inspector General's Report, which has not been completed and will likely make recommendations about reforms at the BOP, are protected from disclosure under the deliberative process privilege, which "covers 'documents reflecting advisory opinions, recommendations and deliberations comprising part of a process by which governmental decisions and policies are formulated.'" Dep't of Interior v. Klamath Water Users Protective Ass'n, 532 U.S. 1, 8 (2001) (quoting N.L.R.B. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 421 U.S. 132, 150 (1975)). The privilege is applicable in criminal and civil cases involving the government. See, e.g., United States v. Fernandez, 231 F.3d 1240, 1246-47 (9th Cir. 2000) (government's death penalty evaluation form and prosecution memoranda were shielded from discovery under the deliberative process privilege); In re Sealed Case, 121 F.3d 729, 737-40 (D.C. Cir. 1997) (indicating that the privilege applies to grand jury subpoenas); United States v. , 8 F. Supp. 2d 253, 284 (S.D.N.Y. 1998) (internal memoranda covered by privilege). "In order for the privilege to apply, the agency record at issue must be (1) an inter-agency or intra-agency memorandum or letter; (2) pre-decisional; and (3) deliberative." Nat'! Res. Def Council v. U.S. Envd. Prot. Agency, 954 F.3d 150, 155 (2d Cir. 2020). "It is well-settled that draft documents, by their very nature, are typically pre-decisional and deliberative [because] [t]hey reflect only the tentative view of their authors; views that might be altered or rejected upon further deliberation by their authors or by their superiors." Color of Change v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 325 F. Supp. 3d 447, 453 (S.D.N.Y. 2018) (quoting Amnesty Int'l USA v. CIA, 728 F. Supp. 2d 479, 518 (S.D.N.Y. 2010)). + +The Inspector General's Report is both pre-decisional and deliberative. A full draft has not + +been completed, let alone reached a point where the final version will be disclosed to the public. It is also deliberative in that it will likely make recommendations about the BOP, and those recommendations will be under discussion within the Office of the Inspector General prior to being finalized and publicly announced. Internal deliberations are an important tool for agencies in reaching decisions, including recommendations in DOJ-OIG reports. The ability to have these discussions is important in identifying a broad range of policy and legal issues. Here, disclosure of any draft report or other work product related to the preparation of the Report will undermine the DOJ-OIG's ability to engage in meaningful discussions of the issues at the BOP relating to inmate security and staffing, among other topics, and will potentially stifle rigorous discourse on the issues. Accordingly, motion should be denied for the reason that the materials sought are protected by the deliberative process privilege. Klamath, 532 U.S. at 9. + +Second, has offered no support for his contention that drafts of the Inspector General's Report itself (and any related work product)—as opposed to the underlying materials upon which the Report is based—are subject to disclosure. To the extent that the forthcoming Inspector General's Report relies on information gathered during the instant investigation and prosecution, those underlying materials—which focus primarily on the events of August 9 and 10, 2019, the incarceration of Jeffrey Epstein, and related MCC records—have already been disclosed to the defendants. contends that those tasked with preparing the Report may "possibl[y)" have generated additional witness statements and "other information" that has not been produced by the Government to date. (Mot. 5). provides no support for such assertions besides mere speculation. The prosecution has inquired of the Washington D.C.-based attorneys who are preparing the Inspector General's Report. Based on those conversations, it is the prosecution's understanding that those attorneys have not conducted any additional interviews or otherwise + +discovered any potential Brady material. As such, given that the prosecution has already produced in discovery all of the materials it provided to the DOJ-OIG attorneys preparing the Report, the underlying materials for the Report would be merely cumulative of information in the defendants' possession. Any analysis of those materials by the attorneys preparing the Inspector General's Report is not subject to disclosure pursuant to Rule 16 and cannot constitute Brady material. See United States v... 35 F.3d 148, 150 (4th Cir. 1994) (noting generally that "nothing contained in [an] OIG report would ordinarily have been discoverable"). + +At bottom, has not cited a single authority requiring the production of a draft, unpublished report by an inspector general or related work product, and such production is not required by Rule 16, Brady, Giglio, or any other disclosure obligation. + +## E. Has Not Carried His Burden NN ith Respect to Discovery of Material in Support of a Selective Prosecution Claim + +Necks "information and statistics that show the conduct in which the defendant is being charged with a crime were . . . rampant throughout the BOP" and that the application of criminal laws to him is "possibl[y] discriminatory." (Mot. 7.) This request, which is effectively a demand for discovery in furtherance of a selective prosecution claim, should be denied not only for the reasons set forth in Section 11.B, but also because has not made the requisite showing that is necessary to obtain discovery for a selective prosecution claim. Indeed, has failed to put forth any evidence that his prosecution was the result of discriminatory effect or discriminatory purpose. + +## 1. Applicable Law + +"A selective-prosecution claim is not a defense on the merits to the criminal charge itself, but an independent assertion that the prosecutor has brought the charge for reasons forbidden by the Constitution." Armstrong, 517 U.S. at 468. The standard to prove this defense is "a demanding one," id., as the defendant must "overcome the strong presumption of regularity on the part of federal prosecutors, and 'in the absence of clear evidence to the contrary, courts presume that they have properly discharged their official duties.'" United States v. Sanders, 17 F. Supp. 2d 141, 144 (E.D.N.Y. 1998) (quoting Armstrong, 517 U.S. at 464), ajf'd, 211 F.3d 711 (2d Cir. 2000). + +A defendant claiming selective prosecution must present "clear evidence" that the decision to prosecute not only (1) "had a discriminatory effect" but was also (2) "motivated by a discriminatory purpose." Armstrong, 517 U.S. at 465; United States v. Alameh, 341 F.3d 167, 173 (2d Cir. 2003); United States v. Fares, 978 F.2d 52, 59 (2d Cir. 1992); United States v. Moon, 718 F.2d 1210, 1229 (2d Cir. 1983). "The discriminatory effect prong requires a showing that 'similarly situated individuals of a different [classification] were not prosecuted.'" Alameh, 341 F.3d at 173 (quoting Armstrong, 517 U.S. at 465). In other words, the defendant must show that he has been "singled out" as a member of a protected class. Fares, 978 F.2d at 59 (quoting Moon, 718 F.2d at 1229). To establish discriminatory purpose, the defendant must show that the Government's discriminatory "selection of the defendant for prosecution has been invidious or in bad faith, i.e., based upon such impermissible considerations as race, religion, or the desire to prevent his exercise of constitutional rights." Id. (internal quotation marks omitted; alteration incorporated). Where a defendant "has not shown that the Government prosecuted him because of his protected status or conduct, his claim fails. Id. + +In order to obtain discovery on a selective prosecution claim, the defendant must offer "some evidence tending to show the existence of the essential elements of the defense." Armstrong, 517 U.S. at 468 (quoting United States v. Berrios, 501 F.2d 1207, 1211 (2d Cir. 1974)); United States v. Bass, 536 U.S. 862, 863 (2002) (per curiam) (to obtain discovery, a defendant accordingly first "must show some evidence of both discriminatory effect and discriminatory + +intent"); Fares, 978 F.2d at 59 (same). "[T]he showing necessary to obtain discovery should itself be a significant bather to the litigation of insubstantial claims." Armstrong, 517 U.S. at 464. "Mere assertions and generalized proffers on information and belief are insufficient" to meet this burden. Fares, 978 F.2d at 59; see, e.g., Armstrong, 517 U.S. at 470 (affidavits "recount[ing] hearsay and report[ing] personal conclusions based upon anecdotal evidence" are not sufficient to justify discovery); Berrios, 501 F.2d at 1211 (affidavit from defendant and attorney that they "believe[d]" there was improper motive and that "hundreds" of similarly situated individuals went unprosecuted was insufficient); Alameh, 341 F.3d at 174 (defendant's statistical analysis was insufficient to merit discovery on selective prosecution claim). + +# 2. Discussion + +is not entitled to discovery that would relate to a selective procession or "discriminatory application" claim. He has not carried his burden through a showing of any evidence that his prosecution for the charges in the Indictment is discriminatory. + +As to the first required prong (discriminatory effect), has failed to put forth any evidence that "others similarly situated have not generally been proceeded against because of conduct of the type forming the basis of the charge against [him]." Fares, 978 F.24 at 59 (internal quotation marks omitted). "A similarly situated offender is one outside the protected class who has committed roughly the same crime under roughly the same circumstances but against whom the law has not been enforced." United States v. 517 F.3d 20, 27 (1st Cir. 2008). alleges that there was an "almost identical incident in 2005 or 2006 wherein officers failed to conduct institutional counts or rounds and an inmate committed suicide," and one of the four officers involved was given a suspension. (Mot. 6). But is not charged with failing to conduct counts, he is charged with making false statements about those counts. Even assuming those officers "in 2005 or 2006" did falsify count slips, has still not put forth any evidence that those officers were "outside of the protected class," meaning of a different race, gender, nationality, or other protected class than . In any event, even were the conduct similar, that can point to but a single other instance in which officers were not criminally prosecuted for that type of conduct hardly rings of selectiveness. + +Similarly, points to the fact that "Officer-1" and "Officer-2" in the Indictment, who falsified count slips along with Tova Noel for the 4 p.m. and 10 p.m. institutional counts on August 9, 2019, respectively, were not prosecuted. (Mot. 10; Ind. 11 15, 17, 19). Even assuming arguendo that Officer-1 and Officer-2 were similarly situated to in that they each falsified one count slip—while falsified three—\_ has failed to put forth any evidence that either Officer-1 or Officer-2 were outside of a "protected class" to which belongs.? Nor could he: Officer-1 and Officer-2 are the same race, gender, and nationality as M. also questions why his supervisors or other MCC personnel who received and reviewed false count slips were not also prosecuted with making false statements, but those supervisors or personnel are not similarly situated to because they did not actually make the false statements did. In addition, Courts have repeatedly held that the "suspicion [and] surmise" contained in motion simply do not constitute "objective evidence" warranting discovery. See United States v. M, 972 F.2d 16, 19 (2d Cir. 1992) (conclusory allegations as to timing of indictment, Government's failure to follow internal guidelines, and improprieties of + +7 In so noting, the Government does not intend to comment on its deliberativeprocess or the exercise of its prosecutorial discretion. It notes these facts Syjn si response to claim that the lack of charges against Officer-1, Officer-2, or supervisors is in and of itself sufficient to meet the defendant's burden of establishing evidence of a similarly situated defendant who was not charged. + +prosecutors not "objective evidence" warranting discovery); Moon, 718 F.2d at 1230 ("to engage in a collateral inquiry respecting prosecutorial motive, there must be more than mere suspicion or surmise"). failure to make an evidentiary showing in support of the first required prong means that his motion for discovery on his selective prosecution claim must be denied. See, e.g., Bass, 536 U.S. at 863. + +As to the second required prong, has failed to even allege, let alone establish, that the decision to prosecute him was motivated by a discriminatory purpose. To make such a showing, a defendant must establish that the Government's "selection of the defendant for prosecution has been invidious or in bad faith, i.e., based upon such impermissible considerations as race, religion, or the desire to prevent his exercise of constitutional rights." Fares, 978 F.2d at 59 (internal quotation marks omitted; alteration incorporated). has not put forth any evidence whatsoever that the Government's decision to prosecute was based on anything other than his guilt. Instead, challenges the Government's decision to prosecute him at all, based on his wholly unsupported claim that the criminal conduct with which he is charged is "rampant" within the BOP. (Mot. 7). But the mere fact that other people were not prosecuted for committing the crime that committed does not mean that the Government harbored discriminatory intent in prosecuting 8 + +8 Even if had not failed to carry his burden on his discovery motion (and he has failed), he would still not be entitled to put such evidence or argument regarding selective prosecution before a jury because the "selective prosecution defense is an issue for the court rather than the jury." Regan, 103 F.3d at 1082. The Second Circuit's directive makes sense. A claim of improper prosecutorial motive, whatever its ground or grounds, "is not a defense on the merits to the criminal charge itself, but an independent assertion that the prosecutor has brought the charge for reasons forbidden by the Constitution." Armstrong, 517 U.S. at 463. Instead, it is selfevidently "unrelated to factual innocence of the crime charged," which is the sole issue to be decided by the jury, and, as a result, the Court alone must resolve a claim of selective prosecution. Regan, 103 F.3d at 1082; see also United States v. Rosado, 728 F.2d 89, 93 (2d Cir. 1984) (criticizing admission of evidence about the propriety of a prosecution "for turning the trial away + +Having failed to meet the "rigorous standard" required to obtain discovery on a selective prosecution defense, requests for discovery of any materials related to other incidents in which officers were not prosecuted for falsifying count slips should be denied. Armstrong, 517 U.S. at 464. + +#### CONCLUSION + +For the foregoing reasons, the defendant's motion to compel should be denied. + +Dated: New York, New York April 24, 2020 + +Respectfully submitted, + +GEOFFREY S. BERMAN United States Attorney + +By: s/ Rebekah Donaleski Jessica Lonergan Nicolas Roos Assistant United States Attorneys + +from a determination of whether the elements of the offense charged had been proved beyond a reasonable doubt into a wide-ranging inquiry into matters far beyond the scope of legitimate issues in a criminal trial"). Accordingly, courts routinely and correctly preclude defendants from raising these arguments at trial. See Regan, 103 F.3d at 1082 ("[W]e agree with the district court's decision to resolve for itself whether the government's conduct was lawful and to prevent Regan from presenting evidence on that subject."); United States v. Raniere, No. 18 Cr. 204 (NGG), Dkt. 622 (precluding argument regarding propriety of Government's prosecution), United States v. Stewart, Cr. No. 03-717 (MGC), 2004 WL 113506, at \*1 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 26, 2004) (granting motion to preclude the defendant from "presenting arguments or evidence that would invite the jury to question the Government's motives in investigating and indicting" the defendant); United States v. , No. 12-CR-319, 2017 WL 928915, at \*3 (D. Nev. Mar. 8, 2017) ("Defendant will be precluded from presenting evidence regarding the government's motive for prosecution in the instant case as such evidence is not relevant."); United States v. Starks, No. 10-CR-0160, 2012 WL 12878587, at \*1 (N.D. Miss. July 20, 2012) (same). \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845891/EFTA02845891.metadata.json b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845891/EFTA02845891.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fafc1e636adefd464f6af7572233fb8e27c27b90 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845891/EFTA02845891.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,1933 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845891.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 34, + "chars": 71097, + "elapsed_seconds": 3.49, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 281.419189453125, + 71.28 + ], + [ + 281.419189453125, + 100.10302734375 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 100.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "MEMORANDUM OF LAW OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA \nIN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT MICHAEL MOTION TO COMPEL", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 78.33600000000001, + 332.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 533.6758422851562, + 332.90999999999997 + ], + [ + 533.6758422851562, + 362.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 78.33600000000001, + 362.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "TABLE OF CONTENTS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 239.29200000000003, + 74.52 + ], + [ + 374.134521484375, + 74.52 + ], + [ + 374.134521484375, + 88.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 239.29200000000003, + 88.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "TABLE OF AUTHORITIES", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 229.5, + 49.41 + ], + [ + 383.5723571777344, + 49.41 + ], + [ + 383.5723571777344, + 64.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 229.5, + 64.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Cases", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 2, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 104.59761047363281, + 83.42999999999999 + ], + [ + 104.59761047363281, + 98.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 98.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "PRELIMINARY STATEMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 5, + "polygon": [ + [ + 220.32, + 71.92889404296875 + ], + [ + 392.2257080078125, + 71.92889404296875 + ], + [ + 392.2257080078125, + 85.93353271484375 + ], + [ + 220.32, + 85.93353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "STATEMENT OF FACTS", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 235.00799999999998, + 512.73 + ], + [ + 378.304931640625, + 512.73 + ], + [ + 378.304931640625, + 527.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 235.00799999999998, + 527.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "I. The Indictment", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 538.6500000000001 + ], + [ + 190.35511779785156, + 538.6500000000001 + ], + [ + 190.35511779785156, + 553.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 553.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "II. Pretrial Discovery and the Defendants' Request for Additional Materials", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 290.78999999999996 + ], + [ + 484.19696044921875, + 290.78999999999996 + ], + [ + 484.19696044921875, + 307.1030578613281 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 307.1030578613281 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A. The Government's Discovery Production", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 104.652, + 317.52 + ], + [ + 348.6584777832031, + 317.52 + ], + [ + 348.6584777832031, + 332.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 104.652, + 332.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B. Defense Requests for Additional Discovery Materials", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 104.652, + 153.89999999999998 + ], + [ + 408.701171875, + 153.89999999999998 + ], + [ + 408.701171875, + 169.10302734375 + ], + [ + 104.652, + 169.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ARGUMENT", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 344.63134765625, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 344.63134765625, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 267.44399999999996, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "I. Applicable Law", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 97.19999999999999 + ], + [ + 192.59771728515625, + 97.19999999999999 + ], + [ + 192.59771728515625, + 112.10302734375 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 112.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A. Brady & Giglio", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 11, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 123.12 + ], + [ + 223.11647033691406, + 123.12 + ], + [ + 223.11647033691406, + 137.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 137.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B. Rule 16", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 291.6 + ], + [ + 186.20301818847656, + 291.6 + ], + [ + 186.20301818847656, + 307.1030578613281 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 307.1030578613281 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "is Not Entitled to Additional Materials", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 510.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 352.91168212890625, + 510.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 352.91168212890625, + 526.10302734375 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 526.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A. The Government Has Satisfied its Discovery and Disclosure Obligations", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 12, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 536.22 + ], + [ + 514.9653930664062, + 536.22 + ], + [ + 514.9653930664062, + 551.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 551.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B. The Requested Records Are Not \"Material\" to Preparing a Defense and Are \nSought for the Impermissible Purpose of Jury Nullification", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 71.92889404296875 + ], + [ + 537.3555908203125, + 71.92889404296875 + ], + [ + 537.3555908203125, + 99.80352783203125 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 99.80352783203125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1. Applicable Law", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 14, + "polygon": [ + [ + 141.372, + 414.72 + ], + [ + 264.3352966308594, + 414.72 + ], + [ + 264.3352966308594, + 429.06353759765625 + ], + [ + 141.372, + 429.06353759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2. Discussion", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 16, + "polygon": [ + [ + 140.76, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 236.8201904296875, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 236.8201904296875, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 140.76, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "C. The Government is Not Required to Collect Materials From Agencies Who \nWere Not Part of the Prosecution Team", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 19, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 208.98 + ], + [ + 530.8341064453125, + 208.98 + ], + [ + 530.8341064453125, + 238.10302734375 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 238.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1. Applicable Law", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 20, + "polygon": [ + [ + 140.76, + 153.89999999999998 + ], + [ + 264.5406188964844, + 153.89999999999998 + ], + [ + 264.5406188964844, + 169.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 140.76, + 169.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2. Discussion", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 23, + "polygon": [ + [ + 140.76, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 236.8201904296875, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 236.8201904296875, + 86.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 140.76, + 86.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "D. Any Draft Inspector General Report is Not Subject to Disclosure", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 25, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 429.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 477.782958984375, + 429.29999999999995 + ], + [ + 477.782958984375, + 445.10302734375 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 445.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "E. Has Not Carried His Burden NN ith Respect to Discovery of Material \nin Support of a Selective Prosecution Claim", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 28, + "polygon": [ + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 345.87 + ], + [ + 537.948, + 345.87 + ], + [ + 537.948, + 376.10302734375 + ], + [ + 105.26399999999998, + 376.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "1. Applicable Law", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 28, + "polygon": [ + [ + 140.76, + 607.5 + ], + [ + 264.59771728515625, + 607.5 + ], + [ + 264.59771728515625, + 622.4830169677734 + ], + [ + 140.76, + 622.4830169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "2. Discussion", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 30, + "polygon": [ + [ + 140.76, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 236.8201904296875, + 319.14000000000004 + ], + [ + 236.8201904296875, + 334.863037109375 + ], + [ + 140.76, + 334.863037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CONCLUSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 33, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 182.25 + ], + [ + 349.8291320800781, + 182.25 + ], + [ + 349.8291320800781, + 196.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 196.4830322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 41 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 29 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "TableOfContents", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "TableOfContents", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 71 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "TableOfContents", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "TableOfContents", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 9, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 10, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 11, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 12, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 13, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 14, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 15, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Text", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 16, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 17, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 18, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 19, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 20, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 21, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 22, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 23, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 24, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 25, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 26, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 27, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 28, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 29, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 30, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 51 + ], + [ + "Line", + 26 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 31, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 32, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 33, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 65 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02845891" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845925/EFTA02845925.md b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845925/EFTA02845925.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..414ce323a1517b25ceab67ac044a9ed2b98ba603 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845925/EFTA02845925.md @@ -0,0 +1,95 @@ +UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, + +-against- + +TOVA NOEL and MICHAEL + +Defendants. + +USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED• 6/9/2020 + +19 Cr. 830-2 (AT) + +#### ORDER + +ANALISA District Judge: + +On November 19, 2019, Defendant Michael was charged with one count of conspiring to defraud the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, and three counts of making false statements with the intent to impede, obstruct, or influence the investigation or proper administration of a matter within the jurisdiction of a department or agency of the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001(aX3). ECF No. 1. The indictment alleges that M, in his capacity as a correctional officer at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (the "MCC"), along with another officer, co-Defendant Tova Noel, submitted several false "count slips" on the night of August 9, 2019 and the morning of August 10, 2019, certifying that he conducted counts of the inmates he was supervising in the MCC's Special Housing Unit ("SHU"), even though he did not conduct those counts. Id. ¶¶ 16, 30, 36, 38, 40. During that time period, one of the inmates in the SHU—Jeffrey Epstein—hanged himself in his cell. Id. ¶1 1, 26-27. + +now moves to compel the Government to produce evidence in connection with the trial scheduled to begin on January 4, 2021. Motion, ECF No. 33. seeks three categories of information: (1) "[t]he report of the Inspector General" for the United States Department of Justice related to Epstein's death, and "any and all supplemental memorandums, written statements, photos, videos, and incident reports" obtained by the Inspector General's investigation, id, at 5; (2) "[a]ny and all internal investigative reports created by the [Bureau of + +Prisons (the "BOP")] as to both [D]efendants, including[] any and all supporting memorandums, written statements, photos, videos, and incident reports," id. at 6; and (3) "any and all reports, memorandums, written statements, photos, videos, and incident reports created, manufactured, or possessed by any investigative or disciplinary agencies[] participating in the investigation of the [D]efendants, allied with the prosecution, and to which the prosecution has access," id. at 7. + +For the reasons stated below, motion is DENIED. + +### DISCUSSION + +The Government has already produced "surveillance video going back to July 5, 2019 ... ; count slips, thirty minute round forms, and staffing rosters for the three-week period surrounding Epstein's suicide; internal MCC phone records; employee files and staffing history for Noel and and a wide range of written [BOP] policies and regulations," as well as "statements for all of the witnesses interviewed during the investigation." Gov't Opp. at 8-9, ECF No. 35. + +argues that he is entitled to additional discovery on two grounds: (1) Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and (2) the constitutional guarantee of due process as expressed by the Supreme Court's decisions in Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972). Motion at I. + +# I. Legal Standards + +# A. Rule 16 + +Rule 16 requires the Government to "permit the defendant to inspect and to copy or photograph books, papers, documents, data, photographs, tangible objects, buildings or places, or copies or portions of any of these items, if the item is within the government's possession, + +custody, or control and: (i) the item is material to preparing the defense; (ii) the [G]overnment intends to use the item in its case-in-chief at trial; or (iii) the item was obtained from or belongs to the defendant." Fed. R. Crim. P. 16(a)(1)(E). "Evidence is material if it could be used to counter the [G]ovemment's case or to bolster a defense." United States v. Ulbricht, 858 F.3d 71, 109 (2d Cir. 2017) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted), abrogated on other grounds by Carpenter v. United States, 138 S. Ct. 2206 (2018). "In order to compel the Government to produce certain evidence, a defendant must make a prima facie showing of materiality, and must offer more than the conclusory allegation that the requested evidence is material." United States v. Abdalla, 317 F. Supp. 3d 786, 790 (S.D.N.Y. 2018) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). "There must be some indication that the pretrial disclosure of the disputed evidence would enable the defendant significantly to alter the quantum of proof in his favor." United States v. Urena, 989 F. Supp. 2d 253, 261 (S.D.N.Y. 2013) (internal quotation marks, citation, and alterations omitted). + +Evidence is "within the [G]ovemment's possession, custody, or control" if "(I) it has actually reviewed [the evidence], or (2) [the evidence is] in the possession, custody, or control of a government agency so closely aligned with the prosecution so as to be considered part of the prosecution team." United States v. Finnerty, 411 F. Supp. 2d 428, 432 (S.D.N.Y. 2006). "Legal ownership of the requested documents or things is not determinative, nor is actual possession necessary if the party has control of the items. Control has been defined to include the legal right to obtain the documents requested upon demand. The term 'control' is broadly construed." United States v. , 488 F. Supp. 2d 350, 361 (S.D.N.Y. 2007) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted) (collecting cases). + +If the Government represents that it "it has fully complied with [its Rule 16] obligations and will continue to do so," the defendant must put forward some "compelling demonstration to the contrary" by pointing to a "specific failure by the Government to comply with its disclosure obligations" in order to justify a motion to compel. United States v. Minaya, 395 F. Supp. 2d 28, 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2005). + +### B. BradylGiglio + +Under the Supreme Court's decision in Brady v. Maryland, the Government "has a constitutional duty to disclose evidence favorable to an accused when such evidence is material to guilt or punishment," and as elaborated in Giglio v. United States, that obligation extends to "not only exculpatory material, but also information that could be used to impeach a key [G]overnment witness." United States v. Coppa, 267 F.3d 132, 135 (2d Cir. 2001). "Evidence is material within the meaning of Brady when there is a reasonable probability that, had the evidence been disclosed, the result of the proceeding would have been different." Turner v. United States, 137 S. Ct. 1885, 1893 (2017) (internal quotation marks, citations, and alteration omitted)); see also Coppa, 267 F.3d at 135 ("[T]he prosecutor must disclose evidence if, without such disclosure, a reasonable probability will exist that the outcome of a trial in which the evidence had been disclosed would have been different."). + +"The prosecution's obligation to disclose Brady material extends to any material in the possession of any entity that has acted as an `arm of the prosecutor' in a given case." United States v. Middendorf, No. 18 Cr. 36, 2018 WL 3956494, at \*4 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 17, 2018) (quoting United States v. Blaszczak, 308 F. Supp. 3d 736, 741 (S.D.N.Y. 2018)). "A prosecutor's duty to review documents in the possession, custody, or control of another agency + +arises where the Government conducts a joint investigation with another agency." United States v. 409 F. Supp. 3d 228, 239 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). In determining whether the prosecution has conducted a joint investigation, courts in this district look to a number of non-exhaustive factors, "including whether the other agency: (1) participated in the prosecution's witness interviews, (2) was involved in presenting the case to the grand jury, (3) reviewed documents gathered by or shared documents with the prosecution, (4) played a role in the development of prosecutorial strategy, or (5) accompanied the prosecution to court proceedings." Id. (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). + +As under Rule 16, if the Government has represented that it is aware of and has complied with its Brady and Giglio obligations, a defendant must make a "particularized showing that materials exist requiring disclosure" in order to sustain a motion to compel. United States v. Juliano, No. 99 Cr. 1197, 2000 WL 640644, at •2 (S.D.N.Y. May 18, 2000); see United States v. Evanchik, 413 F.2d 950, 953 (2d Cir. 1969) ("[T]he assurance by the [G]ovemment that it has in its possession no undisclosed evidence that would tend to exculpate defendant justifies the denial of a motion for inspection that does not make some particularized showing of materiality and usefulness.") + +# II. Inspector General Materials + +seeks disclosure of both the investigatory materials from the Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General's ("OIG") investigation regarding Epstein's death, and a draft of the Inspector General's report arising from that investigation. Motion at 5. The Government concedes that attorneys from OIG participated in the Government's investigation that led to the indictment of M. Gov't Opp. at 3, 19. But, the Government represents that + +it has already delivered to all of the materials gathered by OIG personnel in the course of investigating this case, and that "it is the prosecution's understanding that [GIG] attorneys have not conducted any additional interviews or otherwise discovered any potential Brady material." Id. at 23-24. has not identified any specific material that might be in OIG's possession that has not been disclosed. + +The Court, therefore, has no basis to compel the Government to disclose additional evidence underlying the Inspector General's report. "[C]ourts in this circuit have repeatedly denied requests for discovery orders where the [G]overnment represents that it has produced discovery to defendants pursuant to Rule 16 and has made a good faith representation to the defense that it recognizes and has complied with its obligations under Brady and its progeny." United States v. Pena, No. 17 Cr. 363, 2018 WL 6985220, at \*6 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 19, 2018) (internal quotation marks, citation, and alterations omitted); see also, e.g., United States v. Blondet, No. 16 Cr. 387, 2019 WL 5690711, at •5 ("[T]o the extent that these motions seek evidence pursuant to Brady [], Giglio [], and their progeny, they are [denied] on the basis of the Government's good-faith representation that it has complied with its obligations and will continue to do so." (citations omitted)); United States v. Goode, No. 16 Cr. 529, 2018 WL 919928, at \*18 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 15, 2018) ("The Government represents that it has complied with Rule 16 obligations; the Rule 16 requests are therefore moot." (citation omitted)). + +As for the draft Inspector General's report itself, the Government reports that "attorneys from [GIG] responsible for writing the [r]eport have not yet completed a draft, and do not anticipate completing the [r]eport in the near term," and so "there are no drafts of the [r]eport to disclose." Gov't Opp. at 21-22. The Court cannot grant a motion to compel the Government to produce a report that, at the time of this order, does not exist. I + +Accordingly, M' motion to compel disclosure of materials related to the Inspector General's investigation is DENIED. + +#### III. BOP Materials + +also seeks disclosure of "reports generated by investigators within the [BOP] regarding" Epstein's death, and "any and all documents, reports, witness statements and disciplinary records of any and all MCC employees who have engaged in conduct" similar to that alleged against . Motion at 6. However, has adduced no evidence that the Government reviewed information arising from a BOP investigation. Nor has he shown that BOP officials "participated in the prosecution's witness interviews," were "involved in presenting the case to the grand jury," "reviewed documents gathered by or shared documents with the prosecution," "played a role in the development of prosecutorial strategy," "accompanied the prosecution to court proceedings," or in any other way played a role in the investigation that led to the charges against him. =, 409 F. Supp. 3d at 239 (internal quotation marks, citation, and alteration omitted). There is, therefore, no evidence that BOP personnel participated in the criminal investigation that led to indictment. Thus, the Court concludes that the BOP was not part of the prosecution team for purposes of Rule 16 and Brady. + +To be sure, the BOP is a component of the Department of Justice, but that fact standing alone is not sufficient to make the BOP an arm of the prosecution. "The court cannot find that + +Because the Court denies motion on the ground that no material exists to disclose, it does not address whether the Inspector General's report might contain information material to his defense, nor whether it is protected by the deliberative process privilege. See Gov't Opp. at 12-15, 22-23. + +the government is in constructive possession of the materials where, as here, defendant has not presented any evidence suggesting that the BOP was involved in the investigation or prosecution of this case." United States v.=, No. 13 Cr. 149, 2015 WL 1540517, at \*3 (E.D.N.Y. Apr. 7, 2015); see, e.g., United States v. Merlin, 349 F.3d 144, 155 (3d Cir. 2003) (holding that Government did not violate Brady obligation in failing to turn over tapes in BOP possession because "the BOP was not part of the prosecutorial arm of the federal government as it was not at all involved in either the investigation or the prosecution of the defendants"); United States v. Battle, 264 F. Supp. 2d 1088, 1201-02 (N.D. Ga. 2003) ("Defendant implies that because the BOP employees are connected with the Department of Justice that the prosecution team constructively possessed exculpatory information that could have been within the knowledge of BOP staff . . . Even if the Court assumes that some members of the BOP staff did possess favorable information that alone does not impute knowledge to the prosecution team." (citing United States v. Avellino, 136 F.3d 249, 255 (2d Cir. 1998)). + +Accordingly, a motion to compel the Government to disclose evidence in the possession of the BOP is DENIED. + +#### IV. Other Materials + +Finally, seeks disclosure of information that he argues will tend to show that the conduct for which he is being prosecuted was: "1) rampant throughout the BOP; 2) made with knowledge and acquiescence by the leadership of the BOP; 3) made as a result of BOP policies that forced the defendant to engage in conduct for which he is now being charged criminally, and; 4) made in a manner which contains a possible discriminatory application of BOP policies by [G]overnment prosecutors." Motion at 7. But has not provided support for his + +assertion that the Government, or any other agency that has operated as an arm of the prosecution, is in possession or control of evidence that relates to the prevalence of falsifying count slips in federal correctional facilities, or BOP leadership's tolerance of such practices. + +Moreover, to the extent that is seeking discovery in support of a selective prosecution defense, he has not met the "rigorous" standard that applies for obtaining discovery in aid of such a claim. United States v. Armstrong, 517 U.S. 456, 468 (1996). "[A] defendant who seeks discovery on a claim of selective prosecution must show some evidence of both discriminatory effect and discriminatory intent." United States v. Bass, 536 U.S. 862, 863 (2002). Though claims that BOP supervisors may have acquiesced in his submission of false count slips in this case, and that other BOP employees have submitted false documents in other circumstances, he has not presented any evidence that those officers differed from him in any protected characteristic-for example, that they were of a different race, sex, or ethnicity. See Motion at 10. Nor has put forward any evidence of a discriminatory motive for his prosecution. + +Accordingly, a' motion to compel the Government to disclose evidence that the submission of false count slips was widespread and tolerated at the BOP, and for discovery related to selective prosecution, is DENIED. + +# CONCLUSION + +For the reasons stated, a motion to compel is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion at ECF No. 33. + +SO ORDERED. + +Dated: June 9, 2020 C V d r-New York, New York + +ANALISA United States District Judgc \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845925/EFTA02845925.metadata.json b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845925/EFTA02845925.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..33c7ebbbc8d514c09116d3e725f4a4f9373e1ff5 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845925/EFTA02845925.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,570 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845925.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 9, + "chars": 16460, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.18, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "ORDER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 441.8639999999999, + 184.68 + ], + [ + 492.7633361816406, + 184.68 + ], + [ + 492.7633361816406, + 199.10302734375 + ], + [ + 441.8639999999999, + 199.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "DISCUSSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 266.832, + 236.51999999999998 + ], + [ + 345.26641845703125, + 236.51999999999998 + ], + [ + 345.26641845703125, + 251.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 266.832, + 251.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "I. Legal Standards", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 539.46 + ], + [ + 206.78738403320312, + 539.46 + ], + [ + 206.78738403320312, + 555.7330169677734 + ], + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 555.7330169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "A. Rule 16", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 1, + "polygon": [ + [ + 122.4, + 567.0 + ], + [ + 184.4996795654297, + 567.0 + ], + [ + 184.4996795654297, + 582.7330169677734 + ], + [ + 122.4, + 582.7330169677734 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "B. BradylGiglio", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 3, + "polygon": [ + [ + 122.4, + 208.98 + ], + [ + 210.39352416992188, + 208.98 + ], + [ + 210.39352416992188, + 224.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 122.4, + 224.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "II. Inspector General Materials", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 4, + "polygon": [ + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 511.9200000000001 + ], + [ + 263.02484130859375, + 511.9200000000001 + ], + [ + 263.02484130859375, + 527.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 87.51599999999999, + 527.9830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "III. BOP Materials", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 6, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.904, + 181.44 + ], + [ + 200.7748565673828, + 181.44 + ], + [ + 200.7748565673828, + 196.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 86.904, + 196.4830322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "IV. Other Materials", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 7, + "polygon": [ + [ + 86.904, + 485.18999999999994 + ], + [ + 204.4995880126953, + 485.18999999999994 + ], + [ + 204.4995880126953, + 500.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 86.904, + 500.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "CONCLUSION", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 8, + "polygon": [ + [ + 261.936, + 539.46 + ], + [ + 349.4560241699219, + 539.46 + ], + [ + 349.4560241699219, + 555.1125030517578 + ], + [ + 261.936, + 555.1125030517578 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 63 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 49 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 5, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 47 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 6, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 54 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 7, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 8, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02845925" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845934/EFTA02845934.md b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845934/EFTA02845934.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ca712ca6c22b662ae2bcacdc8e5412db020949d7 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845934/EFTA02845934.md @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@ +![](_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg) + +## The Law Offices of MrIKITPI I rinnimc + +17 Academy Street, Suite 305 Newark, New Jersey 07102 Phone: (973) 242-4700 Fax: (973)242-4701 www.figginslaw.00m BRANCH OFFICES: + +140 East Ridgewood Avenue Paramus, NJ 07640 + +## Reply to Newark Office [X] + +Of Counsel Douglas Mitchell. Esq. Linda Childs. Esq. + +## SENT VIA ECF + +Honorable Analisa U.S. Southern District of NY 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 + +30 Wall Street 8" Floor New York, NY 1005 + +September 1, 2020 + +Re: State of NY v Michael et al. Docket No.: 1:19-cr-00830 Request To Appear Remotely + +Dear Hon. Judge + +As you are aware, our firm represents the defendant, Michael M, in the abovecaptioned matter. We are scheduled for a hearing on September 9, 2020. Given the current pandemic, I am not sure if the Court is allowing in-person hearings; however, I am requesting to appear remotely due to the circumstances surrounding COVID-19. Due to my health, I am unfortunately high risk and believe that it is in my best interest to appear remotely. + +In light of the foregoing, I respectfully request the Court to allow my appearance via video or telephone. + +Respectfully yours, + +/s/ Montell Figgins + +Montell Figgins, Esq. + +Attorney for Defendant Michael + +cc: Nicolas Roos, Esq., Counsel for Plaintiff Rebekah Donaleski, Esq., Counsel for Plaintiff Jessica Lonergan, Esq., Counsel for Plaintiff Jason Erroy Foy, Esq, Counsel for Defendant Noel \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845934/EFTA02845934.metadata.json b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845934/EFTA02845934.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4ce0b82ed147b9919156a25e7c4937650ab476ca --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845934/EFTA02845934.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,138 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845934.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1427, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.96, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "The Law Offices of \nMrIKITPI I rinnimc", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 170.13600000000002, + 48.68707275390625 + ], + [ + 540.60693359375, + 48.68707275390625 + ], + [ + 540.60693359375, + 106.40130615234375 + ], + [ + 170.13600000000002, + 106.40130615234375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Reply to Newark Office [X]", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 191.96999999999997 + ], + [ + 187.20899963378906, + 191.96999999999997 + ], + [ + 187.20899963378906, + 204.12 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 204.12 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SENT VIA ECF", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 294.84000000000003 + ], + [ + 158.6708221435547, + 294.84000000000003 + ], + [ + 158.6708221435547, + 310.10302734375 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 310.10302734375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 90 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02845934" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845934/_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845934/_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..84f5e08f53c16058e24cebd44412df85462d9484 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845934/_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:176dba15f3cf479a3c45f8fc9fedd30a0364708b4c4bf49bff0d67a2603ffac8 +size 4288 diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845935/EFTA02845935.md b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845935/EFTA02845935.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8153cec63ea02e9662ecec42e92ed0fbf0bd88f8 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845935/EFTA02845935.md @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@ +## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA + +-against- + +TOVA NOEL and MICHAEL + +Defendants. + +ANALISA District Judge: + +USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: 9/2/2020 + +19 Cr. 830 (AT) + +ORDER + +The status conference scheduled for September 9, 2020, is ADJOURNED to September 10, 2020, at 1:00 p.m. It is ORDERED that the conference will be conducted remotely, using the Court's videoconferencing software. See In re Coronavirus/Covid-I9 Pandemic, 20 Misc. 176, ECF No. 2 (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 24, 2020) ("[C]onditions make it necessary for the judges in this District to continue to conduct proceedings remotely, by videoconference or teleconference."). will provide the parties with instructions on how to appear via video. + +To optimize the quality of the video feed, only the Court, Defendants, defense counsel, and counsel for the Government will appear by video for the proceeding. Co-counsel, members of the press, and the public may access the audio feed of the conference by calling (888) 398- 2342 or (215) 861-0674 and entering access code 5598827. All of those accessing the conference—whether in listen-only mode or otherwise—are reminded that recording or rebroadcasting of the proceeding is prohibited by law. + +The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion at ECF No. 37. + +SO ORDERED. + +Dated: September 2, 2020 New York, New York + +O 7 / + +ANALISA United States District Judge \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845935/EFTA02845935.metadata.json b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845935/EFTA02845935.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..25455244ba153215526cdc212dd178cf75653cb1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845935/EFTA02845935.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845935.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1448, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.81, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK \nUNITED STATES OF AMERICA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 62.37 + ], + [ + 281.7991943359375, + 62.37 + ], + [ + 281.7991943359375, + 105.363037109375 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 105.363037109375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 76 + ], + [ + "Line", + 35 + ], + [ + "Text", + 14 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02845935" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845936/EFTA02845936.md b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845936/EFTA02845936.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..99112fd96456a9f3291a53371b2b32568698590a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845936/EFTA02845936.md @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@ +![](_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg) + +## The Law Offices of MONTELL FIGGINS,LLC + +17 Academy Street. Suite 305 Newark, New Jersey 07102 Phone: (973) 242-4700 Fax: (973) 242-4701 vnwe.figginslaw.com + +BRANCH OFFICES: + +140 East Ridgewood Avenue Paramus, NJ 07640 + +Reply to Newark Office [X] + +Of Counsel Douglas Mitchell, Esq. Linda Childs. Esq. + +## SENT VIA ECF + +Honorable Analisa U.S. Southern District of NY 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 + +30 Wall Street r Floor New York. NY 1005 + +September 8, 2020 + +Re: State of NY v Michael et al. Docket No.: 1:19-cr-00830 Adjournment Request + +Dear Hon. Judge + +As you are aware, our firm represents Defendant, Michael in the abovecaptioned matter. We are seeking an application for an adjournment of the January 4, 2021 trial date. Due to COVID-I9 and my health concerns, combined with the fact that I need more time to complete my investigation, I am requesting that the Court adjourns the trial date to sometime in mid spring, preferably on or about May 3, 2021. + +Respectfully yours, + +/s/ Montell Figgins + +Montell Figgins, Esq. + +Attorney for Defendant Michael + +cc: Nicolas Roos, Esq.. Counsel for Plaintiff Rebekah Donaleski, Esq., Counsel for Plaintiff Jessica Lonergan, Esq., Counsel for Plaintiff Jason Erroy Foy, Esq, Counsel for Defendant Noel \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845936/EFTA02845936.metadata.json b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845936/EFTA02845936.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0e10c7f49d1d6739a1f06506f89c793b36abd242 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845936/EFTA02845936.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,115 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845936.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1281, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.97, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "The Law Offices of \nMONTELL FIGGINS,LLC", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 148.71599999999998, + 49.41 + ], + [ + 589.36328125, + 49.41 + ], + [ + 589.36328125, + 115.53350830078125 + ], + [ + 148.71599999999998, + 115.53350830078125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SENT VIA ECF", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 309.42 + ], + [ + 158.6708221435547, + 309.42 + ], + [ + 158.6708221435547, + 325.1030578613281 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 325.1030578613281 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 86 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 16 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02845936" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845936/_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845936/_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..86385c8dec0775d207422c081e7a0826978c08a2 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845936/_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:43dac9a6b4d6014ba1286c6d17a7fac75ce5e84eed2eaf312685695a45ec212c +size 6084 diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845937/EFTA02845937.md b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845937/EFTA02845937.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e3ed1f52042bdeb11ff5a7b1452a1d360a3f7fe6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845937/EFTA02845937.md @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ +UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NFW YORK + +UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, + +-v- + +Michael + +Defendant(s). + +X + +X + +ELECTRONICALLY FILED + +IX)C 4: + +DATE FILED: 9/10/2020 + +CONSENT TO PROCEED BY VIDEOCONEERENCE + +19 00830 AT 1 •CR- + +Defendant Michael hereby voluntarily consents to participate In the following proceeding via videoconferencing: + +x Initial Appearance/Appointment of Counsel Arraignment (If on Felony Information, Defendant Must Sign Separate Waiver of Indictment Eo-m) Preliminary Hearing on Felony Complaint Bail/Revocation/Detention Hearing Status and/or Scheduling Conference Misdemeanor Plea/Trial/Sentence + +Yv1Wi (Taf f »xl'2 » •Dr + +Defendant's Signature (Judge may obtain verbal consent on Record and Sign for Defendant) + +Michael + +Print Defendant's Name + +Mita Tike/hr + +Wont& rers Sep + +Defense Counsel's Signature + +Montell Figgins + +Print Defense Counsel's Name + +This proceeding was conducted by reliable videoconferencing technology. + +September 10, 2020 + +Date New York, New York + +ANALISA + +United States District Judgc \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845937/EFTA02845937.metadata.json b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845937/EFTA02845937.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..53886db9c3041cf6dec4f6cbbedc9ab7e5baaec2 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845937/EFTA02845937.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845937.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1040, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.15, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 95 + ], + [ + "Line", + 44 + ], + [ + "Text", + 30 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02845937" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845938/EFTA02845938.md b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845938/EFTA02845938.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..626311c66c152af69208a6197360d4270cb541c0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845938/EFTA02845938.md @@ -0,0 +1,35 @@ +UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, x + +TOVA NOEL Defendant(s). + +ELECTRONICALLY FILED + +DOC #: + +DATE FILED: 9/10/2020 + +CONSENT TO PROCEED BY + +VIDEOCONFERENCE + +19 -CR-830 L\_) AT + +TOVA NOEL Defendant hereby voluntarily consents to participate in the following proceeding via videoconferencing: + +X Initial Appearance/Appointment of Counsel Arraignment (If on Felony Information, Defendant Must Sign Separate Waiver of Indictment Form) Preliminary Hearing on Felony Complaint Bail/Revocation/Detention Hearing Status and/or Scheduling Conference Misdemeanor Plea/Trial/Sentence + +q\_D ." fendant's Signature + +(Judge may obtain verbal consent on Record and Sign for Defendant) + +%?;.7 + +Defe7Counsel's Sign ure + +Tova Noel Jason E. Foy Print Defendant's Name Print Defense Counsel's Name + +This proceeding was conducted by reliable videoconferencing technology. + +September 10. 2020 + +Date New York, New York M911ANA — United States 'strict udge \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845938/EFTA02845938.metadata.json b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845938/EFTA02845938.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..27b1a37286854e5d7ba57da99e30925d81bde9ef --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845938/EFTA02845938.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845938.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 992, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.73, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 38 + ], + [ + "Text", + 21 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02845938" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845939/EFTA02845939.md b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845939/EFTA02845939.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4fec6bb8d65ab9cd9d37815f6fce347774bf5e92 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845939/EFTA02845939.md @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@ +![](_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg) + +## The Law Offices of MONTELL FIGGINS,LLC + +17 Academy Street. Suite 305 + +Newark, New Jersey 07102 + +Phone: (973) 242-4700 + +Fax: (973) 242-4701 + +www.figginslaw.com BRANCH + +## EICCIC•CC + +140 East Ridgewood Avenue Paramus. NJ 07640 Reply to Newark Office [Xi + +Of Counsel Douglas Mitchell. Esq. Linda Childs. Esq. + +September 14. 2020 + +## SENT VIA ECF + +Honorable Analisa U.S. Southern District of NY 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 + +30 Wall Street 5" Floor New York. NY 1005 + +Re: USA v Michael et al. Docket No.: 1:19-cr-00830 Request for Emergency Out of State Travel + +Your Honor, + +This firm represents Defendant, Michael in the above-captioned matter. We are seeking the courts permission for Michael to take an emergency trip to the State of Georgia to tend to his sick father. + +Kristen McKeown, his pre-trial services officer, does not oppose his emergency travel. + +Respectfully yours, + +/s/ Montell Figgins + +Montell Figgins, Esq. Attorney for Defendant Michael + +cc: Nicolas Roos, Esq., Counsel for Plaintiff Rebekah Donaleski, Esq., Counsel for Plaintiff Jessica Lonergan, Esq., Counsel for Plaintiff Jason Erroy Foy, Esq, Counsel for Defendant Noel \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845939/EFTA02845939.metadata.json b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845939/EFTA02845939.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..eebd5be09a27aa96f404cd829daf7b911b1df612 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845939/EFTA02845939.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,138 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845939.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1180, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.11, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "The Law Offices of \nMONTELL FIGGINS,LLC", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 148.71599999999998, + 49.41 + ], + [ + 589.36328125, + 49.41 + ], + [ + 589.36328125, + 115.53350830078125 + ], + [ + 148.71599999999998, + 115.53350830078125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "EICCIC\u2022CC", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 285.804, + 162.0 + ], + [ + 326.25146484375, + 162.0 + ], + [ + 326.25146484375, + 170.1500244140625 + ], + [ + 285.804, + 170.1500244140625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SENT VIA ECF", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 306.99 + ], + [ + 158.62139892578125, + 306.99 + ], + [ + 158.62139892578125, + 322.10302734375 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 322.10302734375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02845939" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845939/_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845939/_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0b09df137c2d6bb07a0009f725386a988acf0f95 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845939/_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:900b8ac562e0a21e2627e4baf24499e8482db6accd07b22cdf70cb02905ea033 +size 5902 diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845940/EFTA02845940.md b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845940/EFTA02845940.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6855e0a43cae59ab9114b8e65f7cd6b5dc4b7c78 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845940/EFTA02845940.md @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@ +![](_page_0_Picture_4.jpeg) + +cc: Nicolas Root Esq.. Counsel for Plaintiff Rebekah Donaleski, Esq., Counsel for Plaintiff Jessica Lonergan, Esq., Counsel for Plaintiff Jason Elroy Foy, Esq, Counsel for Defendant Noel GRANTED. + +## The Law Offices of MONTELL F + +17 Academy Stufe: suite 305 Newark, New Jersey 07102 Phone (973) 2424700 Fax (973) 242-4701 mom figginstaw can BRANCH fIFFIrrc + +USDC SDNY I XX:UMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED I)OC N: DATE FILED: 9/14/2020 + +140 East Ridgewood Avenue Paramus, NJ 07640 Reply to Newark Office (XI + +Of Counsel Douglas Mitchel Esq I oda Chlds, Fsq + +September 14, 2020 + +## SENT VIA ECF + +Honorable Analisa Torres U.S. Southern District of NY 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 + +30 Wall Street 8"' Floor New York, NY 1005 + +Re: USA v Michael et al. Docket No.: 1:19-cr-00830 Request for Emergency Out of State Travel + +Your Honor, + +This firm represents Defendant, Michael in the above-captioned matter. We are seeking the courts permission for Michael to take an emergency trip to the State of Georgia to tend to his sick father. + +Kristen McKeown, his pre-trial services officer, does not oppose his emergency travel. + +Respectfully yours, /s/ Montell Figgins + +Montell Figgins, Esq. Attorney for Defendant Michael + +Dated: September 14, 2020 New York, New York + +ANA LISA Unitcd Statcs District Judgc \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845940/EFTA02845940.metadata.json b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845940/EFTA02845940.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6138b42fac725af41e786ab99d2632d27ac3df0d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845940/EFTA02845940.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,115 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845940.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1325, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.14, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_0_Picture_4.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "The Law Offices of \nMONTELL F", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 148.71599999999998, + 49.41 + ], + [ + 392.37884521484375, + 49.41 + ], + [ + 392.37884521484375, + 115.53350830078125 + ], + [ + 148.71599999999998, + 115.53350830078125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SENT VIA ECF", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 306.99 + ], + [ + 158.6708221435547, + 306.99 + ], + [ + 158.6708221435547, + 322.1030578613281 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 322.1030578613281 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 105 + ], + [ + "Line", + 51 + ], + [ + "Text", + 17 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02845940" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845940/_page_0_Picture_4.jpeg b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845940/_page_0_Picture_4.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..21c14b653c709d565e8e71bfb7d1298bdbf264a5 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845940/_page_0_Picture_4.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:d6f52f4f2733ebf99525f0b3989047ef19702164485a488a810b174c3debe36d +size 5722 diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845941/EFTA02845941.md b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845941/EFTA02845941.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..01833f2f56f05527bda951939f88819cb0ddbdb5 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845941/EFTA02845941.md @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ +## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA + +-against- + +TOVA NOEL and MICHAEL + +Defendants. + +ANALISA District Judge: + +USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: 1/6/2021 + +19 Cr. 830 (AT) + +ORDER + +The status conference scheduled for January 14, 2021, is ADJOURNED to March 17, 2021, at 1:00 p.m. The conference will be conducted remotely, using the Court's videoconferencing software. will provide the parties with instructions on how to appear via video. + +To optimize the quality of the video feed, only the Court, Defendants, defense counsel, and counsel for the Government will appear by video for the proceeding. Co-counsel, members of the press, and the public may access the audio feed of the conference by calling (888) 398- 2342 or (215) 861-0674 and entering access code 5598827. All of those accessing the conference—whether in listen-only mode or otherwise—are reminded that recording or rebroadcasting of the proceeding is prohibited by law. + +SO ORDERED. + +Dated: January 6, 2021 New York, New York + +ANALISA United States District Judge \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845941/EFTA02845941.metadata.json b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845941/EFTA02845941.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..099f94248440a73f459402c233acc9b584806bf9 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845941/EFTA02845941.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845941.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1103, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.69, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK \nUNITED STATES OF AMERICA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 63.17999999999999 + ], + [ + 281.8328552246094, + 63.17999999999999 + ], + [ + 281.8328552246094, + 105.363037109375 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 105.363037109375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02845941" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845942/EFTA02845942.md b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845942/EFTA02845942.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5a7abbe983e56f5da3222d2dee0d9bae027f543f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845942/EFTA02845942.md @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA + +-against- + +TOVA NOEL and MICHAEL + +Defendants. + +ANALISA , District Judge: + +USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: 2/25/2021 + +19 Cr. 830 (AT) + +ORDER + +The status conference scheduled for March 17, 2021, at 1:00 p.m. is ADJOURNED to March 17, 2021, at 3:00 p.m. + +SO ORDERED. + +Dated: February 25, 2021 New York, New York + +> ANALISA United States District Judge \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845942/EFTA02845942.metadata.json b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845942/EFTA02845942.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..96d524f606965f4e4656a56dd091abb7eee7d7ef --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845942/EFTA02845942.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845942.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 463, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.67, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK \nUNITED STATES OF AMERICA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 62.37 + ], + [ + 281.8328552246094, + 62.37 + ], + [ + 281.8328552246094, + 105.363037109375 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 105.363037109375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 44 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02845942" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845943/EFTA02845943.md b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845943/EFTA02845943.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fee6c646f1ec5f45b033e7c29d61ca0dc599a4dd --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845943/EFTA02845943.md @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA + +-against- + +TOVA NOEL and MICHAEL + +Defendants. + +ANALISA District Judge: + +USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: 3/3/2021 + +19 Cr. 830 (AT) + +ORDER + +The trial scheduled for June 14, 2021, is ADJOURNED sine die. The Court, utilizing the procedures within this District governing the scheduling of jury trials during the COVID- 19 pandemic, will seek to schedule a jury trial for the third calendar quarter of 2021. By April 15, 2021, the parties shall submit blackout dates for trial. + +SO ORDERED. + +Dated: March 3, 2021 New York, New York + +ANALISA United States District Judge \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845943/EFTA02845943.metadata.json b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845943/EFTA02845943.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..56fdaa71f99952351cc005a3d8b7a058ce713929 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845943/EFTA02845943.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845943.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 679, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.63, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK \nUNITED STATES OF AMERICA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 62.37 + ], + [ + 281.8328552246094, + 62.37 + ], + [ + 281.8328552246094, + 105.363037109375 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 105.363037109375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 48 + ], + [ + "Line", + 25 + ], + [ + "Text", + 11 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02845943" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845944/EFTA02845944.md b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845944/EFTA02845944.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b1541f7c4f282764a747f39553826e1c30088bf9 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845944/EFTA02845944.md @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ +## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA + +-against- + +TOVA NOEL and MICHAEL la + +Defendants. + +ANALISA District Judge: + +USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: 3/8/2021 + +19 Cr. 830 (AT) + +ORDER + +The status conference scheduled for March 17, 2021, at 1.00 p.m. is ADJOURNED to April 28, 2021, at 1:00 p.m. The conference will be conducted remotely, using the Court's videoconferencing software. will provide the parties with instructions on how to appear via video. + +To optimize the quality of the video feed, only the Court, Defendants, defense counsel, and counsel for the Government will appear by video for the proceeding. Co-counsel, members of the press, and the public may access the audio feed of the conference by calling (888) 398- 2342 or (215) 861-0674 and entering access code 5598827. All of those accessing the conference—whether in listen-only mode or otherwise—are reminded that recording or rebroadcasting of the proceeding is prohibited by law. + +SO ORDERED. + +Dated: February 25, 2021 + +New York, New York Cyr ANALISA United States District Judge \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845944/EFTA02845944.metadata.json b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845944/EFTA02845944.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..533d4b8a267ff7256a7d0a702c21e98c68260efb --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845944/EFTA02845944.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845944.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1123, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.67, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK \nUNITED STATES OF AMERICA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 63.17999999999999 + ], + [ + 281.8328552246094, + 63.17999999999999 + ], + [ + 281.8328552246094, + 105.363037109375 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 105.363037109375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 62 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02845944" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845945/EFTA02845945.md b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845945/EFTA02845945.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3306623efb8b72a23b20241775f6b4b40a830251 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845945/EFTA02845945.md @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ +![](_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg) + +## The Law Offices of MONTELL FIGGINS,LLC + +17 Academy Street, Suite 305 + +Newark, New Jersey 07102 + +Phone: (973) 242-4700 + +Fax: (973) 242-4701 + +vAwaigginslave.com BRANCH + +nccercc• + +140 East Ridgewood Avenue + +Paramus. NJ 07640 + +Reply to Newark Office [X] + +Of Counsel + +Douglas Mitchell. Esq. + +Linda Childs. Esq. + +March 10, 2021 + +## SENT VIA ECF + +Honorable Anal isa U.S. Southern District of NY 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 + +30 Wall Street 8- Floor + +New York. NY 1005 + +Re: USA v Michael et al. Docket No.: 1:19-er-00830 Request for Emergency Out of State Travel + +Your Honor, + +This firm represents Defendant, Michael in the above-captioned matter. We are seeking the courts permission for Michael to take an emergency trip to the State of Georgia to tend to his sick father. + +Kristen McKeown, his pre-trial services officer, does not oppose his emergency travel. + +Respectfully yours + +/s/ Montell Figgins + +Montell Figgins, Esq. + +Attorney for Defendant Michael + +cc: Nicolas Roos, Esq., Counsel for Plaintiff Rebekah Donaleski, Esq., Counsel for Plaintiff Jessica Lonergan, Esq., Counsel for Plaintiff Jason Erroy Foy, Esq, Counsel for Defendant Noel \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845945/EFTA02845945.metadata.json b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845945/EFTA02845945.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..dc8d6b3eb6d28f45270e4ff599a966e8ac1a2353 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845945/EFTA02845945.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,115 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845945.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1178, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.3, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "The Law Offices of \nMONTELL FIGGINS,LLC", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 148.10399999999998, + 49.315673828125 + ], + [ + 588.9832763671875, + 49.315673828125 + ], + [ + 588.9832763671875, + 115.53350830078125 + ], + [ + 148.10399999999998, + 115.53350830078125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SENT VIA ECF", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 67.932, + 306.18 + ], + [ + 158.29080200195312, + 306.18 + ], + [ + 158.29080200195312, + 321.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 67.932, + 321.7330322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 87 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 25 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02845945" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845945/_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845945/_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4b2261431741c622125a9f7c3ba976898f870588 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845945/_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:74707d13d15b6c5fc120af27e73e81bf457e63d658ffffe422fad3812c7ed4b7 +size 5978 diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845946/EFTA02845946.md b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845946/EFTA02845946.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e6ab4f487eafbfc10d9bd96f8a2d9ec75780b588 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845946/EFTA02845946.md @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@ +![](_page_0_Picture_4.jpeg) + +DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED + +## DOC #: IIII The Law Offices of MONTELL Fl DATE FILED: 3/10/2021 + +17 Academy Street, Suite 305 Newark, New Jersey 07102 Phone (973)2424700 Fax (973) 242-4701 www figgnslaw can BRANCH CIFFIrFC + +140 Eat Ridgewood Avenue Pens, NJ 07640 Reply to Newark Office pq + +Of Counsel Douglas Mitchell, Esq. Linda Chdds, Esq + +March 10, 2021 + +## SENT VIA ECF + +Honorable Analisa Torres U.S. Southern District of NY 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 + +30 Wel Street en= Now York, NY 1005 + +Re: USA v Michael et al. Docket No.: 1:19-cr-00830 Request for Emergency Out of State Travel + +Your Honor, + +This firm represents Defendant, Michael m , in the above-captioned matter. We are seeking the courts pennission for Michael r to take an emergency trip to the State of Georgia to tend to his sick father. + +Kristen McKeown, his pre-trial services officer, does not oppose his emergency travel. + +Respectfully yours + +/s/ Monte!' Figgins Montell Figgins, Esq. Attorney for Defendant Michael + +cc: Nicolas Roos, Esq., Counsel for Plaintiff Rebekah Donaleski. Esq.. Counsel for Plaintiff Jessica Lonergan, Esq.. Counsel for Plaintiff Jason Erroy Foy. Esq. Counsel for Defendant Noel GRANTED. + +SO ORDERED. + +Dated: March 10, 2021 New York. New York + +ANALISA United States District Judge I \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845946/EFTA02845946.metadata.json b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845946/EFTA02845946.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f6cc126660eb8af0bc5b673f12abd36163fb7848 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845946/EFTA02845946.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,115 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845946.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1320, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.26, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_0_Picture_4.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "DOC #: IIII \nThe Law Offices of \nMONTELL Fl DATE FILED: 3/10/2021", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 94.94999694824219, + 49.41 + ], + [ + 546.3927612304688, + 49.41 + ], + [ + 546.3927612304688, + 115.41705322265625 + ], + [ + 94.94999694824219, + 115.41705322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "SENT VIA ECF", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 306.99 + ], + [ + 158.6708221435547, + 306.99 + ], + [ + 158.6708221435547, + 322.1030578613281 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 322.1030578613281 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 109 + ], + [ + "Line", + 50 + ], + [ + "Text", + 20 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02845946" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845946/_page_0_Picture_4.jpeg b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845946/_page_0_Picture_4.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f6ae9e1f3a673e21fc5683eea8893d9cbef0f1fe --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845946/_page_0_Picture_4.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:80c29c1742a921c0346a0d67ce5671eaf200c3d9cac4e7d7edae544ce51f1570 +size 5622 diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845947/EFTA02845947.md b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845947/EFTA02845947.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..607def4c7a2c1beaf72327529bb9cc988c25c449 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845947/EFTA02845947.md @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +![](_page_0_Picture_4.jpeg) + +United States Attorney Southern District of New York + +The Silvio J. Mono Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York. New York 10007 + +April 15, 2021 + +## BY ECF + +The Honorable Analisa United States District Judge Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, New York 10007 + +Re: United States v. Noel and 19 Cr. 830 (AT) + +Dear Judge + +The Government submits this letter pursuant to the Court's order dated March 3, 2021 Dkt. No. 46). The Government has conferred with counsel for defendants Tova Noel and Michael regarding the parties' availability for trial. In the third quarter offl021 counsel for Noel is available for trial beginning on September 27, 2021, and counsel for is available for trial from August 16-27 and after September 15, 2021. The Government is available for trial at the Court's convenience. + +The Government respectfully requests, with the consent of the defendants, through counsel, that time under the Speedy Trial Act be excluded up to the new trial date. + +Respectfully submitted, + +AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney + +By: /s/ Jessica Lonergan Nicolas Roos Assistant United States Attorneys (212) 637-1038/-2421 + +Cc: Defense Counsel \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845947/EFTA02845947.metadata.json b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845947/EFTA02845947.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b1ed3d37842c5a5446940ca9794d1f006e36e5b6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845947/EFTA02845947.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,115 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845947.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1197, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.93, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_0_Picture_4.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "U.S. Department of Justice", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 319.464, + 26.73 + ], + [ + 464.0820617675781, + 26.73 + ], + [ + 464.0820617675781, + 41.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 319.464, + 41.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "BY ECF", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 155.52 + ], + [ + 118.92080688476562, + 155.52 + ], + [ + 118.92080688476562, + 169.4830322265625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 169.4830322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 67 + ], + [ + "Line", + 34 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02845947" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845947/_page_0_Picture_4.jpeg b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845947/_page_0_Picture_4.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..526ce1f1870fc13e5a3fd02fa0c72c81f36d5b57 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845947/_page_0_Picture_4.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:fc419105722b58cb0f2c809efeafa6c6896c84287315951b34bdf4eaf83c572c +size 3574 diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845948/EFTA02845948.md b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845948/EFTA02845948.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5c092d3dcf63907ba6a5c09e50fd43bf48c22871 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845948/EFTA02845948.md @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ +## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA + +-against- + +TOVA NOEL and MICHAEL la + +Defendants. + +ANALISA , District Judge: + +USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: 4/20/2021 + +19 Cr. 830 (AT) + +ORDER + +The Court has reviewed the parties' letter dated April 15, 2021, setting forth their available dates for trial, ECF No. 50. Due to conflicts in the Court's and the parties' availability in the third quarter of 2021, the Court, utilizing the procedures within this District governing the scheduling of jury trials during the COVID-19 pandemic, will instead seek to schedule a jury trial for the fourth calendar quarter of 2021. By July 16, 2021, the parties shall submit blackout dates for trial. + +The time between June 14, 2021 and October 1, 2021 is excluded under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), in the interests of justice. The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting the exclusion outweigh the best interests of the public and Defendants in a speedy trial, because such an extension is necessary to efficiently administer the Court's docket consistent with public safety, and because it will allow the parties to prepare for trial and to discuss potential pretrial disposition. + +SO ORDERED. + +Dated: April 19, 2021 New York, New York + +ANALISA United States District Judge \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845948/EFTA02845948.metadata.json b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845948/EFTA02845948.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..cc44f7fd9f0e4d30da48c8e9a290275736abd3f5 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845948/EFTA02845948.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845948.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1366, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.72, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK \nUNITED STATES OF AMERICA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 62.37 + ], + [ + 281.8328552246094, + 62.37 + ], + [ + 281.8328552246094, + 105.363037109375 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 105.363037109375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02845948" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845949/EFTA02845949.md b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845949/EFTA02845949.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..0c6fcb977aa6387947c9eba1b37f7c4041f4a63d --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845949/EFTA02845949.md @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ +## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA + +-against- + +TOVA NOEL and MICHAEL la + +Defendants. + +ANALISA District Judge: + +USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: 4/26/2021 + +19 Cr. 830 (AT) + +ORDER + +The status conference scheduled for April 28, 2021, at 1:00 p.m. is ADJOURNED to June 17, 2021, at 1:00 p.m. The conference will be conducted remotely, using the Court's videoconferencing software. will provide the parties with instructions on how to appear via video. + +To optimize the quality of the video feed, only the Court, Defendants, defense counsel, and counsel for the Government will appear by video for the proceeding. Co-counsel, members of the press, and the public may access the audio feed of the conference by calling (888) 398- 2342 or (215) 861-0674 and entering access code 5598827. All of those accessing the conference—whether in listen-only mode or otherwise—are reminded that recording or rebroadcasting of the proceeding is prohibited by law. + +SO ORDERED. + +Dated: April 26, 2021 New York, New York + +ANALISA United States District Judge \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845949/EFTA02845949.metadata.json b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845949/EFTA02845949.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d0a1d16e5b912aa92f8f0f544b5d6b238164d79b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845949/EFTA02845949.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845949.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1116, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.68, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK \nUNITED STATES OF AMERICA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 63.17999999999999 + ], + [ + 281.8328552246094, + 63.17999999999999 + ], + [ + 281.8328552246094, + 105.363037109375 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 105.363037109375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 61 + ], + [ + "Line", + 31 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02845949" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845950/EFTA02845950.md b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845950/EFTA02845950.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..e78ba8bded4ef1104c1c3036ea2ab6a2d51fb597 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845950/EFTA02845950.md @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@ +![](_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg) + +United States Attorney Southern District of New York + +The Silvio J. Mello Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York. New York 10007 + +May 21, 2021 + +## BY ECF + +The Honorable Analisa United States District Judge Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, New York 10007 + +Re: United States v. Noel and 19 Cr. 830 (AT) + +Dear Judge + +The Government submits this letter to inform the Court that the parties have entered into deferred prosecution agreements (the "Agreements"), which have been approved by Pretrial Services and are included for the Court's consideration.' After a thorough investigation, and based on the facts of this case and the personal circumstances of the defendants, the Government has determined that the interests of justice will best be served by deferring prosecution in this District. The proposed Agreements contemplate an additional six-month term of supervision by Pretrial Services and, in addition to the standard terms of pretrial supervision, the proposed Agreements include the additional salient terms: + +- The defendants will cooperate with a pending Department of Justice Office of Inspector General review by providing truthful information related to their employment by the Bureau of Prisons, including about the events and circumstances described in the Indictment; and +- The defendants will complete 100 hours of community service, preferably in an area related to the criminal justice system. + +The defendants have consented to the entry of the Agreements and have also admitted that they "willfully and knowingly completed materially false count and round slips regarding required counts and rounds in the Special Housing Unit of the Metropolitan Correctional Center on August 9, 2019 and August 10, 2019." + +The Government respectfully requests, with the consent of the defendants, through counsel, that the Court schedule a hearing date for entry of the Agreements. Having conferred with defense counsel, all parties are available to proceed by video conference on Tuesday, May 25, 2021, should + +As the deferred prosecution agreements are not final until they are approved by the Court, the Government has not filed them publicly with this letter. + +that date be convenient for the Court. If that date is not convenient for the Court, or if the Court wishes to proceed in person, the parties can propose alternative dates. + +Respectfully submitted, + +AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney + +By: /s/ Jessica Lonergan Nicolas Roos Assistant United States Attorneys (212) 637-1038/-2421 + +Cc: Defense Counsel Pretrial Services \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845950/EFTA02845950.metadata.json b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845950/EFTA02845950.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a62bc4b2b04c540f51f8d6399e3efba25388ed9b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845950/EFTA02845950.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,161 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845950.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2598, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.06, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "U.S. Department of Justice", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 318.85200000000003, + 25.92 + ], + [ + 463.6654968261719, + 25.92 + ], + [ + 463.6654968261719, + 40.56353759765625 + ], + [ + 318.85200000000003, + 40.56353759765625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "BY ECF", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 168.48 + ], + [ + 118.92080688476562, + 168.48 + ], + [ + 118.92080688476562, + 182.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 182.9830322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 80 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 29 + ], + [ + "Line", + 15 + ], + [ + "Text", + 5 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02845950" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845950/_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845950/_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..1dd1ac1b123a514e6615cb1fda171ba3241c4369 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845950/_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:47725f30dc4582cb5bb3dea8924bfd4978b8eb9cd56eff9401a8b656048ab725 +size 3503 diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845952/EFTA02845952.md b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845952/EFTA02845952.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9d25500cd492cdef41205133199f65177526a89a --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845952/EFTA02845952.md @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ +## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA + +-against- + +TOVA NOEL and MICHAEL , + +Defendants. + +ANALISA District Judge: + +USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: 5/24/2021 + +19 Cr. 830 (AT) + +ORDER + +The Court is in receipt of the parties' letter dated May 21, 2021, ECF No. 53. Accordingly, on May 25, 2021, at 2:00 p.m., the Court shall conduct a video hearing on Defendants' deferred prosecution agreements. + +To optimize the quality of the video feed, only the Court, Defendants, defense counsel, and counsel for the Government will appear by video for the proceeding. Co-counsel, members of the press, and the public may access the audio feed of the conference by calling (888) 398- 2342 or (215) 861-0674 and entering access code 5598827. All of those accessing the conference—whether in listen-only mode or otherwise—are reminded that recording or rebroadcasting of the proceeding is prohibited by law. + +SO ORDERED. + +Dated: May 24, 2021 New York, New York + +ANALISA United States District Judge \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845952/EFTA02845952.metadata.json b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845952/EFTA02845952.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b834f6f5d8cc6314b9441464e1a4534f44b9badd --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845952/EFTA02845952.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845952.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1055, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.7, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK \nUNITED STATES OF AMERICA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 63.17999999999999 + ], + [ + 281.8328552246094, + 63.17999999999999 + ], + [ + 281.8328552246094, + 105.363037109375 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 105.363037109375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 60 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02845952" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845953/EFTA02845953.md b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845953/EFTA02845953.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..b906e9400df7265deab8ccd4858c2fd617e0ac15 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845953/EFTA02845953.md @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@ +## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA + +-against- + +TOVA NOEL and MICHAEL + +Defendants. + +USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: 5/25/2021 + +19 Cr. 830 (AT) + +## ORDER + +ANALISA , District Judge: + +This Order is entered, pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5(f) and the Due Process Protections Act, Pub. L. No 116-182, 134 Stat. 894 (Oct. 21, 2020), to confirm the Government's disclosure obligations under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), and its progeny, and to summarize the possible consequences of violating those obligations. + +The Government must disclose to the defense all information "favorable to an accused" that is "material either to guilt or to punishment" and that is known to the Government. Id. at 87. This obligation applies regardless of whether the defendant requests this information or whether the information would itself constitute admissible evidence. The Government shall disclose such information to the defense promptly after its existence becomes known to the Government so that the defense may make effective use of the information in the preparation of its case. + +As part of these obligations, the Government must disclose any information that can be used to impeach the trial testimony of a Government witness within the meaning of Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972), and its progeny. Such information must be disclosed sufficiently in advance of trial in order for the defendant to make effective use of it at trial or at such other time as the Court may order.' + +This Order does not purport to set forth an exhaustive list of the Government's disclosure obligations. + +The foregoing obligations are continuing ones and apply to materials that become known to the Government in the future. These obligations also apply to information that is otherwise subject to disclosure regardless of whether the Government credits it. + +In the event the Government believes that a disclosure under this Order would compromise witness safety, victim rights, national security, a sensitive law-enforcement technique, or any other substantial government interest, it may apply to the Court for a modification of its obligations, which may include in camera review or withholding or subjecting to a protective order all or part of the information otherwise subject to disclosure.2 + +For purposes of this Order, the Government has an affirmative obligation to seek all information subject to disclosure under this Order from all current or former federal, state, and local prosecutors, law enforcement officers, and other officers who have participated in the prosecution, or investigation that led to the prosecution, of the offense or offenses with which the defendant is charged. + +If the Government fails to comply with this Order, the Court, in addition to ordering production of the information, may: + +- (1) specify the terms and conditions of such production; +- (2) grant a continuance; +- (3) impose evidentiary sanctions; +- (4) impose contempt or other sanctions on any lawyer responsible for violations of the Government's disclosure obligations, or refer the matter to disciplinary authorities; +- (5) dismiss charges before trial or vacate a conviction after trial or a guilty plea; or + +2 The Classified Information Procedures Act sets forth separate procedures to be followed in the event that the Government believes matters relating to classified information may arise in connection with the prosecution. See 18 U.S.C. app. 3 § 1 et seq. + +(6) enter any other order that is just under the circumstances. + +SO ORDERED. + +Dated: May 25, 2021 New York, New York + +ANALISA + +United States District Judge \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845953/EFTA02845953.metadata.json b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845953/EFTA02845953.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d345910111983be99e7d8460dbfe0924bc04c888 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845953/EFTA02845953.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,193 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845953.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 3718, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.8, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK \nUNITED STATES OF AMERICA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 62.424, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 274.5726013183594, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 274.5726013183594, + 114.43353271484375 + ], + [ + 62.424, + 114.43353271484375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 429.624, + 172.53 + ], + [ + 480.552734375, + 172.53 + ], + [ + 480.552734375, + 186.80352783203125 + ], + [ + 429.624, + 186.80352783203125 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 64 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 55 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 5 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "Footnote", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 17 + ], + [ + "Line", + 9 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02845953" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845956/EFTA02845956.md b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845956/EFTA02845956.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..599b6aafc44d78cc74bf1a32b802ade40af9d814 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845956/EFTA02845956.md @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ +## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK + +United States of America + +v. + +Michael M, + +Defendant. + +TO: MICHAEL + +DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC it: DATE FILED: 5/25/2021 + +## Deferred Prosecution Agreement + +19 Cr. 830 (AT) + +On November 19, 2019, a grand jurySin this District returned a six-count indictment (the "Indictment"), which charged Michael ("you") with committing offenses against the United States, to wit, conspiring to knowingly defraud the United States and to knowingly make and use a false writing or document, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, and three counts of knowingly making and using a false writing or document, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001. However, after a thorough investigation, and based on the facts of this case and your personal circumstances, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York ("USAO-SDNY") has determined that the interests of justice will best be served by deferring prosecution in this District. Upon your acceptance of responsibility for your behavior and by your signature on this deferred prosecution agreement (the "Agreement"), prosecution will be deferred during the term of your behavior and satisfactory compliance with the terms of this Agreement for the period of six months from the date of this Agreement. + +The terms and conditions constituting your good behavior and satisfactory compliance are as follows: + +- (1) You shall refrain from violating any federal, state, or local law. You shall immediately contact your U.S. Pretrial Services Officer if arrested or questioned by a lawenforcement officer. +- (2) You shall associate only with law-abiding persons. +- (3) You shall work regularly at a lawful occupation, regularly attend school, and/or support or care for your legal dependents, if any, to the best of your ability, as approved by your U.S. Pretrial Services Officer. You shall notify your supervising U.S. Pretrial Services Officer prior to any work or school changes. +- (4) You shall not leave the contiguous United States without permission of your supervising U.S. Pretrial Services Officer. In accordance with this condition, the U.S. Pretrial Services Office shall return your passport upon the Court's entering this Agreement, and shall do so indefinitely unless this Agreement is violated. + +- (5) You shall notify your supervising U.S. Pretrial Services Officer immediately of any change in your place of residence. +- (6) You shall follow your supervising U.S. Pretrial Services Officer's instructions and advice. +- (7) You shall report to your supervising U.S. Pretrial Services Officer as directed. + +As a further condition you hereby consent to disclosure, by any federal, state, or local government agency, or by any medical or substance abuse treatment provider, to the U.S. Pretrial Services Officer supervising your case, of such medical and treatment records as may be requested by the Pretrial Services Officer to evaluate deferral of prosecution in this case. You further agree that you will execute any additional consent forms that any such agency or provider may require to release such information. + +Special conditions are as follows: + +You shall truthfully and completely disclose all information with respect to the activities of yourself and others related to your employment by the Bureau of Prisons ("BOP"), which information can be used for any purpose. You shall agree to meet with and be interviewed by the USAO-SDNY, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Department of Justice, Office of the Inspector General ("DOJ-OIG"), and any other law enforcement agency designated by this Office. + +You shall complete 100 documented hours of community service, preferably related to the criminal justice system, including working with recently released inmates. The specific type of community service to be performed must be approved by your Pretrial Services Officer. + +The USAO-SDNY may at any time revoke or modify any condition of this provisional release or change the period of such supervision, which shall in no case exceed six months. The USAO-SDNY may discharge you from supervision at any time. The USAO-SDNY may at any time proceed with the prosecution for this offense should the USAO-SDNY, in its sole discretion, deem such action advisable. + +If upon completion of your supervision a written report from your supervising U.S. Pretrial Services Officer is received to the effect that you have complied with all the rules, regulations and conditions and special conditions applicable to your deferred prosecution, no further prosecution will be instituted in this District for the above offenses. + +Nothing in this Agreement shall be interpreted to preclude the BOP or the DOJ-OIG from taking any administrative action against you, including suspension or termination of employment, based on the facts alleged in the Indictment, the facts identified in the course of the investigation that led to the Indictment, or your own statements to the DOJ-OIG or any other law enforcement entity. Nothing in this Agreement shall be interpreted to require the BOP or the DOJ-OIG to delay + +this by contemplated deferment of period the of expiration the after until action administrative any acceptance and admission your including Agreement, this of copy a that agree You Agreement. BOP. the to provided be shall responsibility, of + +and terms the all fulfills and supervision of term the complete successfully you If to as Indictment the dismiss to Court the move will Government the Agreement, this of conditions defendant. the herein forth set conditions and terms the and Agreement this that understood further is It value. precedential lack and case this of circumstances and facts the to limited are + +York New York, New Dated: 2021 20, May + +STRUASS AUDREY + +the for Attorney States United York New of District Southern By: + +(11.402\*-•-• • + +Roos Nicolas Lonergan Jessica + +Attorneys States United Assistant 1038 / 212-637-2421 Tel.: + +The undersigned hereby consents to the foregoing. The undersigned hereby further admits that he willfully and knowingly completed materially false count and round slips regarding required counts and rounds in the Special Housing Unit of the Metropolitan Correctional Center ("MCC") on August 9, 2019 and August 10, 2019. The undersigned expressly waives any and all rights to a speedy trial pursuant to the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution, the Speedy Trial Act, §§ 3161 et seq., and any other pertinent provisions, and consents to the adjournment of all pending proceedings in this case. The undersigned further waives the applicable statute of limitations with respect to any prosecution that is not time-barred on the date that this agreement is signed. It is the intent of this provision to toll the applicable statute of limitations during the pendency of the deferred prosecution. + +The undersigned understands that pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(2), this Agreement is subject to approval by the Court. Should the Court refuse to approve, and thereby reject, this Agreement, neither party shall be bound to any term of this Agreement, and no admissions in this Agreement may be used against the undersigned. + +Finally, the undersigned acknowledges that he has read this Agreement and has carefully reviewed each provision with his attorney. The undersigned and his attorney acknowledge that no threats, promises, or representations have been made, nor agreements reached, other than those set forth in this Agreement. The undersigned further acknowledges that he understands and voluntarily accepts each and every term and condition of this Agreement. + +Dated: New York, New York May 0 2 2021 + +NO eel/ ag Montell Figgins (May , 021 15:419 EDT) + +Montell Figgins, Esq. Attorney for Defendant - m.,".. iivaDdiAtatx- , 16.04 EDT) + +Michael Defendant + +Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161(hX2), exclusion under the Speedy Trial Act of the period of time during which the prosecution of the defendant is deferred pursuant to this Agreement is hereby approved. + +Dated: New York, New York May 25 2021 + +> Honorable Analisa Torres United States District Judge + +The undersigned hereby consents to the foregoing and will accept supervision of the above-named defendant on the conditions set forth herein. + +Dated: New York, New York May , 2021 + +> Francesca Piperato Digitally signed by Francesca Piperato Date: 2021.05.24 10:3k36 United States Pretrial Services Officer \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845956/EFTA02845956.metadata.json b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845956/EFTA02845956.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a6f7ca2b491f893d428794f694046ee058149096 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845956/EFTA02845956.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,261 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845956.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 5, + "chars": 8463, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.11, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 281.02825927734375, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 281.02825927734375, + 100.10302734375 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 100.10302734375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Deferred Prosecution Agreement", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 361.692, + 127.17 + ], + [ + 537.560302734375, + 127.17 + ], + [ + 537.560302734375, + 142.10302734375 + ], + [ + 361.692, + 142.10302734375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 84 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "Text", + 9 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 45 + ], + [ + "Line", + 23 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 32 + ], + [ + "Text", + 8 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 39 + ], + [ + "Line", + 20 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02845956" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845961/EFTA02845961.md b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845961/EFTA02845961.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bc30393a6f1a8db1e5d12cd6aeb236977bd4862e --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845961/EFTA02845961.md @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@ +DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC 4: DATE FILED: 5"25'2021 + +UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK + +---------------X + +UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, + +-v- + +Tova Noel + +Defendant(s). ------------------------------------------X CONSENT TO PROCEED BY VIDEOCONFERENCE + +19 -CR-830 (\_) AT + +Defendant Tova Noel hereby voluntarily consents to participate in the following proceeding via videoconferencing: + +Initial Appearance/Appointment of Counsel Arraignment (If on Felony Information, Defendant Must Sign Separate Waiver of Indictment Form) Preliminary Hearing on Felony Complaint Bail/Revocation/Detention Hearing Status and/or Scheduling Conference Misdemeanor Plea/Trial/Sentence + +/efrp.a. ,.ea + +Defendant's Signature (Judge may obtain verbal consent on Record and Sign for Defendant) + +Tova Noel + +Print Defendant's Name + +Defense Counsel's Signature + +.re + +Jason E. Foy + +Print Defense Counsel's Name + +This proceeding was conducted by reliable videoconferencing technology. + +5/25/2021 Or + +Date U.S. District Judge/U.S. Magistrate Judge \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845961/EFTA02845961.metadata.json b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845961/EFTA02845961.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8584afba79c298244cfe3e7766578bfe8148cf9f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845961/EFTA02845961.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845961.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1044, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.13, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 85 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 24 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02845961" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845962/EFTA02845962.md b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845962/EFTA02845962.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..110149301fc34d79e7c5c4629538d488e9145e59 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845962/EFTA02845962.md @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@ +UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK + +UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, + +-v- + +MiChael Defendant(s). X + +X + +DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC 4: DATE FILED: 5/25/2021 + +CONSENT TO PROCEED BY VIDEOCONFERENCE + +19 \_cR.830 (f ) + +Defendant Michael hereby voluntarily consents to participate in the following proceeding via videoconferencing: + +X Initial Appearance/Appointment of Counsel Arraignment (If on Felony Information, Defendant Must Sign Separate Waiver of Indictment Form) Preliminary Hearing on Felony Complaint Bail/Revocation/Detention Hearing Status and/or Scheduling Conference Misdemeanor Plea/Trial/Sentence + +Defendant's Signature (Judge may obtain verbal consent on Record and Sign for Defendant) + +Michael + +Print Defendant's Name + +7entiatic\*f.44. + +Defense Counsel's Signature + +Montell Figgins + +Print Defense Counsel's Name + +This proceeding was conducted by reliable videoconferencing technology. + +5/25/2021 Or + +Date U.S. District Judge/U.S. Magistrate Judge \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845962/EFTA02845962.metadata.json b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845962/EFTA02845962.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..bd7e153cdf317193f56e5844354c821323f841c7 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845962/EFTA02845962.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845962.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 982, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.19, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 86 + ], + [ + "Line", + 40 + ], + [ + "Text", + 24 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02845962" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845963/EFTA02845963.md b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845963/EFTA02845963.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f4195604a969ca7d05e0aa65a2df52a9bc44eed0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845963/EFTA02845963.md @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@ +## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK + +United States of America + +V. + +Tova Noel, + +Defendant. + +TO: TOVA NOEL + +DOC 4: + +DATE FILED: 5/25/2021 + +## Deferred Prosecution Agreement + +19 Cr. 830 (NI) + +On November 19,2019, a grand jury sitting in this District returned a six-count indictment (the "Indictment"), which charged Tova Noel ("you") with committing offenses against the United States, to wit, conspiring to knowingly defraud the United States and to knowingly make and use a false writing or document, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, and five counts of knowingly making and using a false writing or document, in violation of IS U.S.C. § 1001. However, after a thorough investigation, and based on the facts of this case and your personal circumstances, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York ("USAO-SDNY") has determined that the interests of justice will best be served by deferring prosecution in this District. Upon your acceptance of responsibility for your behavior and by your signature on this deferred prosecution agreement (the "Agreement"), prosecution will be deferred during the term of your behavior and satisfactory compliance with the terms of this Agreement for the period of six months from the date of this Agreement. + +The terms and conditions constituting your good behavior and satisfactory compliance are as follows: + +- (1) You shall refrain from violating any federal, state, or local law. You shall immediately contact your U.S. Pretrial Services Officer if arrested or questioned by a lawenforcement officer. +- (2) You shall associate only with law-abiding persons. +- (3) You shall work regularly at a lawful occupation, regularly attend school, and/or support or care for your legal dependents, if any, to the best of your ability, as approved by your U.S. Pretrial Services Officer. You shall notify your supervising U.S. Pretrial Services Officer prior to any work or school changes. +- (4) You shall not leave the contiguous United States without permission of your supervising L.S. Pretrial Services Officer. In accordance with this condition, the U.S. Pretrial Services Office shall return your passport upon the Court's entering this Agreement, and shall do so indefinitely unless this Agreement is violated. + +- (5) You shall notify your supervising U.S. Pretrial Services Officer immediately of any change in your place of residence. +- (6) You shall follow your supervising U.S. Pretrial Services Officer's instructions and advice. +- (7) You shall report to your supervising U.S. Pretrial Services Officer as directed. + +As a further condition you hereby consent to disclosure, by any federal, state, or local government agency, or by any medical or substance abuse treatment provider, to the U.S. Pretrial Services Officer supervising your case, of such medical and treatment records as may be requested by the Pretrial Services Officer to evaluate deferral of prosecution in this case. You further agree that you will execute any additional consent forms that any such agency or provider may require to release such information. + +Special conditions are as follows: + +You shall truthfully and completely disclose all information with respect to the activities of yourself and others related to your employment by the Bureau of Prisons ("BOP"), which information can be used for any purpose. You shall agree to meet with and be interviewed by the USAO-SDNY, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Department of Justice, Office of the Inspector General ("D0J-OIG"), and any other law enforcement agency designated by this Office. + +You shall complete 100 documented hours of community service, preferably related to the criminal justice system, including working with recently released inmates. The specific type of community service to be performed must be approved by your Pretrial Services Officer. + +The USAO-SDNY may at any time revoke or modify any condition of this provisional release or change the period of such supervision, which shall in no case exceed six months. The USAO-SDNY may discharge you from supervision at any time. The USAO-SDNY may at any time proceed with the prosecution for this offense should the USAO-SDNY, in its sole discretion, deem such action advisable. + +If upon completion of your supervision a written report from your supervising U.S. Pretrial Services Officer is received to the effect that you have complied with all the rules, regulations and conditions and special conditions applicable to your deferred prosecution, no further prosecution will be instituted in this District for the above offenses. + +Nothing in this Agreement shall be interpreted to preclude the BOP or the D01-016 from taking any administrative action against you, including suspension or termination of employment, based on the facts alleged in the Indictment, the facts identified in the course of the investigation that led to the Indictment, or your own statements to the DOJ-OIG or any other law enforcement entity. Nothing in this Agreement shall be interpreted to require the BOP or the DOJ-OIG to delay + +any administrative action until after the expiration of the period of deferment contemplated by this Agreement. You agree that a copy of this Agreement, including your admission and acceptance of responsibility, shall be provided to the BOP. + +If you successfully complete the term of supervision and fulfills all the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the Government will move the Court to dismiss the Indictment as to the defendant. + +It is further understood that this Agreement and the terms and conditions set forth herein are limited to the facts and circumstances of this case and lack precedential value. + +Dated: New York, New York May 20, 2021 + +> AUDREY STRUASS United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York + +By: Nicolas Roos Jessica Lonergan Assistant United States Attorneys Tel.: 212-637-2421 / 1038 + +The undersigned hereby consents to the foregoing. The undersigned hereby further admits that she willfully and knowingly completed materially false count and round slips regarding required counts and rounds in the Special Housing Unit of the Metropolitan Correctional Center ("MCC") on August 9, 2019 and August 10, 2019. The undersigned expressly waives any and all rights to a speedy trial pursuant to the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution, the Speedy Trial Act, §§ 3161 el seq., and any other pertinent provisions, and consents to the adjournment of all pending proceedings in this case. The undersigned further waives the applicable statute of limitations with respect to any prosecution that is not time-barred on the date that this agreement is signed. It is the intent of this provision to toll the applicable statute of limitations during the pendency of the deferred prosecution. + +The undersigned understands that pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(2), this Agreement is subject to approval by the Court. Should the Court refuse to approve, and thereby reject, this Agreement, neither party shall be bound to any term of this Agreement, and no admissions in this Agreement may be used against the undersigned. + +Finally, the undersigned acknowledges that she has read this Agreement and has carefully reviewed each provision with her attorney. The undersigned and her attorney acknowledge that no threats, promises, or representations have been made, nor agreements reached, other than those set forth in this Agreement The undersigned further acknowledges that she understands and voluntarily accepts each and every term and condition of this Agreement. + +Dated: New York, New York Maya, 2021 + +Jason •y, Esq. Atto ey for Defend + +Tova Noel Defendant + +Pursuant to IS U.S.C. §316 I (hX2), exclusion under the Speedy Trial Act of the period of time during which the prosecution of the defendant is deferred pursuant to this Agreement is hereby approved. + +Dated: New York, New York May 25, 2021 + +Honorable Anal isa United States District Judge + +The undersigned hereby consents to the foregoing and will accept supervision of the above-named defendant on the conditions set forth herein. + +Dated: New York, New York May 2g.\_, 2021 + +ntted Sta P 'al Services Officer \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845963/EFTA02845963.metadata.json b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845963/EFTA02845963.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a6328f1f02090c5ded2e2c9188c6370ab9b73466 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845963/EFTA02845963.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,261 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845963.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 5, + "chars": 8239, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.17, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 89.964, + 121.5 + ], + [ + 281.9947509765625, + 121.5 + ], + [ + 281.9947509765625, + 148.214111328125 + ], + [ + 89.964, + 148.214111328125 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "Deferred Prosecution Agreement", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 353.736, + 173.34 + ], + [ + 513.2813110351562, + 173.34 + ], + [ + 513.2813110351562, + 187.0946044921875 + ], + [ + 353.736, + 187.0946044921875 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 86 + ], + [ + "Line", + 42 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 3 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 73 + ], + [ + "Line", + 37 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "ListItem", + 3 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "ListGroup", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 41 + ], + [ + "Line", + 21 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 3, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 53 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 4, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 29 + ], + [ + "Line", + 15 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02845963" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845968/EFTA02845968.md b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845968/EFTA02845968.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8505aaf0853273bd8ba73be9130449d0f78d5ebd --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845968/EFTA02845968.md @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +![](_page_0_Picture_4.jpeg) + +United States Attorney Southern District of New York + +The Silvio J. Mono Building One Saint Andrew's Plom New York. New York 10007 + +July 29, 2021 + +## By ECF + +Honorable Analisa United States District Judge Southern District of New York Daniel Moynihan United States Courthouse 500 Pearl Street New York, New York 10007 + +> Re: United States v. Tova Noel et al., 19 Cr. 830 (AT) + +Dear Judge + +Please be advised that I am leaving the United States Attorney's Office for other employment. Accordingly, please remove me as counsel of record in the above-captioned case. + +Thank you very much for the Court's consideration. + +Respectfully submitted, + +AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney + +by: Jessica Lonergan Assistant United States Attorney (212) 637-1038 + +cc: Counsel of Record (by ECF) \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845968/EFTA02845968.metadata.json b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845968/EFTA02845968.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..14a09aa3417d531b73b12484886d49f52ac1c6ff --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845968/EFTA02845968.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,115 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845968.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 809, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.13, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_0_Picture_4.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "U.S. Department of Justice", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 319.464, + 26.73 + ], + [ + 463.6654968261719, + 26.73 + ], + [ + 463.6654968261719, + 41.2330322265625 + ], + [ + 319.464, + 41.2330322265625 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "By ECF", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 169.29 + ], + [ + 116.29080200195312, + 169.29 + ], + [ + 116.29080200195312, + 183.7330322265625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 183.7330322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 59 + ], + [ + "Line", + 30 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02845968" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845968/_page_0_Picture_4.jpeg b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845968/_page_0_Picture_4.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8157f0f9ddef2836cfdf3fd2f48dbda8920eba3f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845968/_page_0_Picture_4.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:8dff25606f8dbd9ad8c79e06be2c430484855abc37071d2d30484c05a6199b76 +size 3676 diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845969/EFTA02845969.md b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845969/EFTA02845969.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..20483dee21b82534f134d977320cde6f9232b40b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845969/EFTA02845969.md @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@ +U.S. Departmen + +United States Au Southern Distric, + +The Silvio J. Mono Building One Saint Andrew's Plaza New York, New York 10007 + +July 29, 2021 + +By ECF + +Honorable Analisa United States District Judge Southern District of New York Daniel Moynihan United States Courthouse 500 Pearl Street New York, New York 10007 + +> Re: United States v. Tova Noel et al., 19 Cr. 830 (AT) + +Dear Judge + +![](_page_0_Picture_4.jpeg) + +DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: 7/29/202 I + +Please be advised that I am leaving the United States Attorney's Office for other employment. Accordingly, please remove me as counsel of record in the above-captioned case. + +Thank you very much for the Court's consideration. + +Respectfully submitted, + +AUDREY STRAUSS United States Attorney + +by: ddratt4".• Jessica Lonergan Assistant United States Attorney (212) 637-1038 + +cc: Counsel of Record (by ECF) + +SO ORDERED. + +Dated: July 29, 2021 New York, New York + +Qor ANALISA United States District Judge \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845969/EFTA02845969.metadata.json b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845969/EFTA02845969.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d5ae7d63ba75db63c3e0003d26a38a6df52ebbc3 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845969/EFTA02845969.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845969.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 973, + "elapsed_seconds": 1.07, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_0_Picture_4.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 83 + ], + [ + "Line", + 41 + ], + [ + "Text", + 18 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02845969" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845969/_page_0_Picture_4.jpeg b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845969/_page_0_Picture_4.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..5adf3fb5194b912c6cf546e8dcb42f6e560ed760 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845969/_page_0_Picture_4.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:2f81ccf5aa01ab4837d8a2f4d8e28bed9dff7fa8f94925e0b40c58238748732e +size 3697 diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845970/EFTA02845970.md b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845970/EFTA02845970.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..01b4398230e17322a60a8a7d95f3a6bbf5597210 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845970/EFTA02845970.md @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA + +-against- + +TOVA NOEL and MICHAEL + +Defendants. + +ANALISA District Judge: + +USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: 12/10/2021 + +19 Cr. 830 (AT) + +## ORDER + +The status conference scheduled for December 16, 2021, at 1:00 p.m., is ADJOURNED to December 16, 2021, at 3:30 p.m. + +The status conference shall proceed by the Court's videoconference system. See In re Coronavirus/Covid-I9 Pandemic, No. 20 Misc. 176 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 15, 2021), ECF No. 7 (finding that the COVID-19 pandemic "make[s] it necessary for the judges in this District to be able to continue to conduct proceedings remotely."). will provide the parties with instructions on how to appear via video. + +To optimize the quality of the video feed, only the Court, Defendants, defense counsel, and counsel for the Government will appear by video for the proceeding; all others may participate by telephone. Co-counsel, members of the press, and the public may access the audio feed of the hearing by calling (888) 398-2342 or (215) 861-0674 at the time of the hearing, and entering access code 5598827. + +SO ORDERED. + +Dated: December 10, 2021 New York, New York + +ANALISA United States District Judge \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845970/EFTA02845970.metadata.json b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845970/EFTA02845970.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..9d31a2115ab099dde578aa2e4165ae79ca310e26 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845970/EFTA02845970.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,109 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845970.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1259, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.73, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK \nUNITED STATES OF AMERICA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 62.37 + ], + [ + 281.8328552246094, + 62.37 + ], + [ + 281.8328552246094, + 105.363037109375 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 105.363037109375 + ] + ] + }, + { + "title": "ORDER", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 441.8639999999999, + 162.0 + ], + [ + 493.17315673828125, + 162.0 + ], + [ + 493.17315673828125, + 176.9830322265625 + ], + [ + 441.8639999999999, + 176.9830322265625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 66 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02845970" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845971/EFTA02845971.md b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845971/EFTA02845971.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..ea80df6b0078e5a37b07418ff6320a7cae485bee --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845971/EFTA02845971.md @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA + +-against- + +TOVA NOEL and MICHAEL , + +Defendants. + +ANALISA • District Judge: + +The status conference scheduled for December 16, 2021, is ADJOURNED sine die. + +SO ORDERED. + +Dated: December 15, 2021 New York, New York + +ANALISA United States District Judge + +USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: 12/15/2021 + +19 Cr. 830 (AT) + +ORDER \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845971/EFTA02845971.metadata.json b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845971/EFTA02845971.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..a1a4fba715652d6522fd28985efacd4a3387ea4f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845971/EFTA02845971.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845971.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 432, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.84, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK \nUNITED STATES OF AMERICA", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 62.37 + ], + [ + 281.8328552246094, + 62.37 + ], + [ + 281.8328552246094, + 105.363037109375 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 105.363037109375 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 44 + ], + [ + "Line", + 22 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02845971" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845972/EFTA02845972.md b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845972/EFTA02845972.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..617171b8e914db968e3fd445388bd090eab8be2b --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845972/EFTA02845972.md @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@ +UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK + +x + +UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NOLLE PROSEQUI + +19 Cr. 830 (AT) + +TOVA NOEL and MICHAELIIIIIII, + +Defendants. + +x + +1. The filing of this nolle prosequi will dispose of this case with respect to TOVA NOEL and MICHAEL Ill.., the defendants. + +2. On or about November 19, 2019, a grand jury sitting in this District returned Indictment 19 Cr. 830 (AT), which charged TOVA NOEL and MICHAEL , the defendants, with committing offenses against the United States, to wit, conspiring to knowingly defraud the United States and to knowingly make and use a false writing or document, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, and knowingly making and using afalse writing or document, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001. + +3. On or about May 20, 2021, TOVA NOEL and MICHAEL , the defendants, entered into deferred prosecution agreements with the Government. Under the agreements, prosecution was deferred for a period of six months during the term of NOEL's and good behavior, completion of community service, and + +satisfactory compliance with the terms of the agreement. The United States Pretrial Services Office has informed the Government that NOEL and have complied with the terms of the agreement during the period of deferral, which expired on November 20, 2021. + +4. In light of the foregoing, the Government recommends that an order of nolle prosequi be filed as to TOVA NOEL and MICHAEL , the defendants, with respect to Indictment 19 Cr. 830 (AT). + +> Nicolas Roos Assistant United States Attorney (212) 637-2421 + +Dated: New York, New York December 13, 2021 + +Upon the foregoing recommendation, I hereby direct, with leave of the Court, that an order of nolle prosequi be filed as to defendants TOVA NOEL and MICHAEL with respect to Indictment 19 Cr. 830 (AT). + +Dated: New York, New York December 13, 2021 + +SO ORDERED: + +Dated: New York, New York , 2021 + +illiams ed States Attorney Southern District of New York + +HONORABLE ANALISA United States District Judge Southern District of New York \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845972/EFTA02845972.metadata.json b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845972/EFTA02845972.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..24e29bd02736f9d4cdede4d5940dceb87da177bd --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845972/EFTA02845972.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,126 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845972.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 2058, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.72, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 217 + ], + [ + "Line", + 27 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 121 + ], + [ + "Line", + 16 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 40 + ], + [ + "Line", + 18 + ], + [ + "Text", + 6 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02845972" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845975/EFTA02845975.md b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845975/EFTA02845975.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..25ccbb5789a48b64794d80ada73794477b07e960 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845975/EFTA02845975.md @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@ +USDC SD - DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED + +UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IOC 4: SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED: 1/3/2022 + +x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NOLLE PROSEQUI TOVA NOEL and MICHAEL Defendants. x + +19 Cr. 830 (AT) + +1. The filing of this nolle prosequi will dispose of this case with respect to TOVA NOEL and MICHAEL , the defendants. + +2. On or about November 19, 2019, a grand jury sitting in this District returned Indictment 19 Cr. 830 (AT), which charged TOVA NOEL and MICHAEL , the defendants, with committing offenses against the United States, to wit, conspiring to knowingly defraud the United States and to knowingly make and use a false writing or document, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, and knowingly making and using a false writing or document, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001. + +3. On or about May 20, 2021, TOVA NOEL and MICHAEL , the defendants, entered into deferred prosecution agreements with the Government. Under the agreements, prosecution was deferred for a period of six months during the term of NOEL's and good behavior, completion of community service, and + +satisfactory compliance with the terms of the agreement. The United States Pretrial Services Office has informed the Government that NOEL and have complied with the terms of the agreement during the period of deferral, which expired on November 20, 2021. + +4. In light of the foregoing, the Government recommends that an order of nolle prosequi be filed as to TOVA NOEL and MICHAEL , the defendants, with respect to Indictment 19 Cr. 830 (AT). + +> Nicolas Roos Assistant United States Attorney (212) 637-2421 + +Dated: New York, New York December 13, 2021 + +Upon the foregoing recommendation, I hereby direct, with leave of the Court, that an order of nolle prosequi be filed as to defendants TOVA NOEL and MICHAEL [REDACTED] with respect to Indictment 19 Cr. 830 (AT). + +![]()Dated: New York, New York +December 13, 2021 + +SO ORDERED. + +Dated: January 3, 2022 +New York, New York + +![]() \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845975/EFTA02845975.metadata.json b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845975/EFTA02845975.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d9f32f58db6df7dd588b89e114f2065e0c73c5f0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845975/EFTA02845975.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,130 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845975.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 3, + "chars": 1989, + "elapsed_seconds": 2.49, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 72 + ], + [ + "Line", + 33 + ], + [ + "Text", + 7 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 1, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 121 + ], + [ + "Line", + 16 + ], + [ + "Text", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 2 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + }, + { + "page_id": 2, + "text_extraction_method": "surya", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 38 + ], + [ + "Line", + 18 + ], + [ + "Text", + 12 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 4 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 2 + ], + [ + "Caption", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02845975" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845978/EFTA02845978.md b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845978/EFTA02845978.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..7d9a9fe2b6f2f8d9b398b9e0640dabe9af2524d6 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845978/EFTA02845978.md @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISRICT OF NEW YORK + +x + +UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PROPERTY RELEASE ORDER + +> 19 Cr. 830(AT) -against- + +TOVA NOEL, et al, + +Defendant. + +x + +Upon the letter application of Jason E. Foy, Esq, attorney for the defendant, TOVA NOEL, for an Order mandating the release of the firearm and all other property surrendered the New York City Police Department as a condition of bail back to the defendant, + +IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the New York City Police Department shall immediately return the firearm and all other property surrendered as a condition of bail in the above referenced criminal action. + +Dated: January , 2022 New York, New York + +> HONORABLE ANALISA US District Court Judge of the SDNY \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845978/EFTA02845978.metadata.json b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845978/EFTA02845978.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..72bee885ed9e7bcf4d9b20ba7118b2a77c3b6949 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845978/EFTA02845978.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845978.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 730, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.57, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISRICT OF NEW YORK", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 70.38, + 72.56842041015625 + ], + [ + 309.2096862792969, + 72.56842041015625 + ], + [ + 309.2096862792969, + 101.86199951171875 + ], + [ + 70.38, + 101.86199951171875 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 46 + ], + [ + "Line", + 24 + ], + [ + "Text", + 10 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02845978" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845979/EFTA02845979.md b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845979/EFTA02845979.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..23bf94a522a169e439afba18818ea41d12176bb7 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845979/EFTA02845979.md @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@ +![](_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg) + +MI .0 --- FOY & SEPLOW I TZE a t t o r n ey s a t l a w + +105 MAIN STREET HACKENSACK. NJ 07601 TEL: 201-457-0071 FAX: 201-457-0072 WWW.FOYSEPLOWITZ.COM + +January 5, 2022 + +Honorable Analisa United States District Court Judge Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 + +> Re: US v. Tova Noel, et al Docket # 19 cr. 830 (AT) Order to Release Firearm and any other Property + +Dear Judge + +30 WALL STREET 8TH FLOOR NEW YORK. NY 10005 TEL 212-709-8230 + +On January 3, 2022, the Court filed the fully executed Nolle Prosequi Order formally terminating the prosecution and dismissing all criminal charges in the above referenced criminal action. In November of 2019, Ms. Tova Noel was released with conditions. One of the conditions required the surrender of her firearm to the New York City Police Department (NYPD). As required, Ms. Noel promptly surrendered her firearm to the 44th Precinct of the NYPD in the Bronx. + +On January 4, 2022, Ms. Noel went to the 44th Precinct to retrieve her firearm with a copy of the Nolle Prosequi Order. She was referred to the NYPD property clerk's office located in the basement of the Bronx Criminal Court. The NYPD property clerk was presented with the Nolle Prosequi Order, however, the property clerk refused to release the firearm. The NYPD property clerk indicated that they would only release the firearm pursuant to a court order. + +Attached is a proposed order mandating the release of Ms. Noel's firearm and any other property that was surrendered as a condition of release. I have spoken with the Government regarding this application, and they have no objection. Thank you for your thoughtful consideration. + +Sincerely, + +FOY & SEPLOWITZ LLC + +"awl e gy + +JASON E. FOY ifovflovsealowitz.com \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845979/EFTA02845979.metadata.json b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845979/EFTA02845979.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3b3751560a9e90e2e4639a24959c0e59b5dd6fd1 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845979/EFTA02845979.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845979.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1776, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.86, + "image_assets": [ + "_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg" + ], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 108 + ], + [ + "Line", + 43 + ], + [ + "Text", + 15 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "Picture", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02845979" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845979/_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845979/_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..fca08c8dcdc39150198de9fd24a596eec47bc4b0 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845979/_page_0_Picture_1.jpeg @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +version https://git-lfs.github.com/spec/v1 +oid sha256:98eebcb70b9c5706dba1cefb7f727b47dfec1f0e6899dbc097b0590a4439c658 +size 2958 diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845980/EFTA02845980.md b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845980/EFTA02845980.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..be1591e89eb986cd637b72384a455e4651cf368f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845980/EFTA02845980.md @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +## UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISRICT OF NEW YORK + +x + +UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, + +-against- + +TOVA NOEL, et al, + +Defendant. + +x + +USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: 1/6/2022 + +PROPERTY RELEASE ORDER + +19 Cr. 830(AT) + +Upon the letter application of Jason E. Foy, Esq, attorney for the defendant, TOVA NOEL, for an Order mandating the release of the firearm and all other property surrendered the New York City Police Department as a condition of bail back to the defendant, + +IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the New York City Police Department shall immediately return the firearm and all other property surrendered as a condition of bail in the above referenced criminal action. + +Dated: January 6 , 2022 + +New York, New York ANALISA United States District Judge \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845980/EFTA02845980.metadata.json b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845980/EFTA02845980.metadata.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4d3498350efd43a5a041762e03a395c74213a627 --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845980/EFTA02845980.metadata.json @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ +{ + "source_pdf": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845980.pdf", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "pages": 1, + "chars": 782, + "elapsed_seconds": 0.82, + "image_assets": [], + "marker_metadata": { + "table_of_contents": [ + { + "title": "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISRICT OF NEW YORK", + "heading_level": null, + "page_id": 0, + "polygon": [ + [ + 68.544, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 309.2146301269531, + 72.08999999999999 + ], + [ + 309.2146301269531, + 101.73248291015625 + ], + [ + 68.544, + 101.73248291015625 + ] + ] + } + ], + "page_stats": [ + { + "page_id": 0, + "text_extraction_method": "pdftext", + "block_counts": [ + [ + "Span", + 56 + ], + [ + "Line", + 28 + ], + [ + "Text", + 13 + ], + [ + "PageHeader", + 4 + ], + [ + "SectionHeader", + 1 + ], + [ + "PageFooter", + 1 + ] + ], + "block_metadata": { + "llm_request_count": 0, + "llm_error_count": 0, + "llm_tokens_used": 0, + "previous_text": "", + "previous_type": "", + "previous_order": 0 + } + } + ], + "debug_data_path": "debug_data/EFTA02845980" + } +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/marker2/court-us-v-noel/ocr-manifest.json b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/ocr-manifest.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..6efcdc7d44bc3f0651c8d1017b968dae3609270f --- /dev/null +++ b/marker2/court-us-v-noel/ocr-manifest.json @@ -0,0 +1,1856 @@ +{ + "source_dir": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel", + "output_dir": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-us-v-noel", + "created_at": "2026-09-18T03:57:36.735723+00:00", + "updated_at": "2026-09-18T07:14:01.694870+00:00", + "tasks": { + "b5b6d6b0e6c2d40099ef720a9f90c1f58d1cc55e8a4739322a81456215fea226": { + "sha": "b5b6d6b0e6c2d40099ef720a9f90c1f58d1cc55e8a4739322a81456215fea226", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845736.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02845736.pdf", + "size": 1826526, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 20, + "chars": 23623, + "elapsed": 5.030947032966651, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845736/EFTA02845736.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "acb3bb82c342ed4aaac38b2072dac0e898dee6899eeb5d2655877946e990365b": { + "sha": "acb3bb82c342ed4aaac38b2072dac0e898dee6899eeb5d2655877946e990365b", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845756.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02845756.pdf", + "size": 51207, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 1, + "chars": 540, + "elapsed": 0.665007128030993, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845756/EFTA02845756.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "984a76d616743cf18afc8b654ee0c2f0285e7ee1497213a3529a36080e653665": { + "sha": "984a76d616743cf18afc8b654ee0c2f0285e7ee1497213a3529a36080e653665", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845757.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02845757.pdf", + "size": 46576, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 1, + "chars": 480, + "elapsed": 1.4339700939599425, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845757/EFTA02845757.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "7bc6b4a8f1d2fbb511986cdd35f94cca7a93c7d8863c5c61d169f655207e703e": { + "sha": "7bc6b4a8f1d2fbb511986cdd35f94cca7a93c7d8863c5c61d169f655207e703e", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845758.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02845758.pdf", + "size": 168267, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 1, + "chars": 2124, + "elapsed": 13.266447855043225, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845758/EFTA02845758.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "95596aba5079b3f7e21dec5500baf0482d37df3416defa732059590eef3c27a6": { + "sha": "95596aba5079b3f7e21dec5500baf0482d37df3416defa732059590eef3c27a6", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845759.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02845759.pdf", + "size": 168942, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 1, + "chars": 2156, + "elapsed": 2.177292641950771, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845759/EFTA02845759.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "5b7867c8c36923af721be4e3903653a579f70e3f3cad592b71710cf36aa73723": { + "sha": "5b7867c8c36923af721be4e3903653a579f70e3f3cad592b71710cf36aa73723", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845760.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02845760.pdf", + "size": 1286566, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 10, + "chars": 16982, + "elapsed": 14.787320393952541, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845760/EFTA02845760.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "67b4bc1c8077606fcb3b59c13b99ebe68d1cc391eaedd5c5191b8b5da62ef268": { + "sha": "67b4bc1c8077606fcb3b59c13b99ebe68d1cc391eaedd5c5191b8b5da62ef268", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845770.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02845770.pdf", + "size": 998548, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 8, + "chars": 14322, + "elapsed": 4.578904379042797, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845770/EFTA02845770.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "130b5665d23b3d1bbe52dd2401f95c481b20bf46546e7bb6028eb0adba6c6e5a": { + "sha": "130b5665d23b3d1bbe52dd2401f95c481b20bf46546e7bb6028eb0adba6c6e5a", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845778.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02845778.pdf", + "size": 49963, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 1, + "chars": 523, + "elapsed": 0.6343950759619474, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845778/EFTA02845778.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "0056c854dacbfea9ac24372b4c44fa0d4d2794dba892a4935ab73b7c559e1441": { + "sha": "0056c854dacbfea9ac24372b4c44fa0d4d2794dba892a4935ab73b7c559e1441", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845779.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02845779.pdf", + "size": 54451, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 1, + "chars": 593, + "elapsed": 0.6359538920223713, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845779/EFTA02845779.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "1f067a0d27771c96ca0d56fa8949b7d89155df7f061d6477cfb0f1340fff2d0e": { + "sha": "1f067a0d27771c96ca0d56fa8949b7d89155df7f061d6477cfb0f1340fff2d0e", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845780.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02845780.pdf", + "size": 63241, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 1, + "chars": 867, + "elapsed": 0.8436298139858991, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845780/EFTA02845780.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "fe3ca25c94ecaca60e152413cc6be0cac9142766a7c7bcbed7cae259390f0d39": { + "sha": "fe3ca25c94ecaca60e152413cc6be0cac9142766a7c7bcbed7cae259390f0d39", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845781.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02845781.pdf", + "size": 305512, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 5, + "chars": 4533, + "elapsed": 0.8223815540550277, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845781/EFTA02845781.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "f12d40ece0062c8899b3a1fb84c3e76d7887b3cfd200711e19e7d0a50142b035": { + "sha": "f12d40ece0062c8899b3a1fb84c3e76d7887b3cfd200711e19e7d0a50142b035", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845786.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02845786.pdf", + "size": 55973, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 1, + "chars": 765, + "elapsed": 0.7446214780211449, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845786/EFTA02845786.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "17ee08f169a19f0f4a15ca8e276e4ab1f418bb0ce1c32815baa85803f18af300": { + "sha": "17ee08f169a19f0f4a15ca8e276e4ab1f418bb0ce1c32815baa85803f18af300", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845787.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02845787.pdf", + "size": 954402, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 12, + "chars": 14633, + "elapsed": 2.0522019939962775, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845787/EFTA02845787.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "5494fcc2db30390ca13e224dd13c08c1726ecdfff355d4c0a3e480a05ea35492": { + "sha": "5494fcc2db30390ca13e224dd13c08c1726ecdfff355d4c0a3e480a05ea35492", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845799.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02845799.pdf", + "size": 95965, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1441, + "elapsed": 0.9151401619892567, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845799/EFTA02845799.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "1c75f0ddb13dfdb22dfc73e84ed4c0a4d020a93cfb9c868f623a7243090f3924": { + "sha": "1c75f0ddb13dfdb22dfc73e84ed4c0a4d020a93cfb9c868f623a7243090f3924", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845800.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02845800.pdf", + "size": 333234, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 5, + "chars": 4564, + "elapsed": 1.2661259250016883, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845800/EFTA02845800.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "6dc0edc8c94c0573ae9041d5060cad3444bb76e2982aeb72853bee4590962768": { + "sha": "6dc0edc8c94c0573ae9041d5060cad3444bb76e2982aeb72853bee4590962768", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845805.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02845805.pdf", + "size": 1231262, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 15, + "chars": 19021, + "elapsed": 2.4965550319757313, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845805/EFTA02845805.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "31d6505e42d53b1228edd80ba7c1268ae74feea932d992fdc5913970ba23235c": { + "sha": "31d6505e42d53b1228edd80ba7c1268ae74feea932d992fdc5913970ba23235c", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845820.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02845820.pdf", + "size": 95972, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1440, + "elapsed": 0.8780461469432339, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845820/EFTA02845820.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "38183991a856ef87fdbdfaf99359888efb4169aca547ddede79b1be720d6ce87": { + "sha": "38183991a856ef87fdbdfaf99359888efb4169aca547ddede79b1be720d6ce87", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845821.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02845821.pdf", + "size": 45940, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 1, + "chars": 653, + "elapsed": 1.3793681970564649, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845821/EFTA02845821.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "5179e906a3196ce02dce8a4b3ccf83ea5083119f50d4d8bfd744a11c836c7668": { + "sha": "5179e906a3196ce02dce8a4b3ccf83ea5083119f50d4d8bfd744a11c836c7668", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845822.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02845822.pdf", + "size": 275746, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 2, + "chars": 4127, + "elapsed": 0.8492218289757147, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845822/EFTA02845822.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "8f8c170fb9bf9406d2f38095b603e8741b4c9d482391078c71bf9f1f49f19f3f": { + "sha": "8f8c170fb9bf9406d2f38095b603e8741b4c9d482391078c71bf9f1f49f19f3f", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845824.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02845824.pdf", + "size": 231825, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 2, + "chars": 3668, + "elapsed": 1.0262453788891435, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845824/EFTA02845824.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "7e093a8d213a2a197243bcb73c11e6fd5a5af934d36aa639b9f2f28296658d8e": { + "sha": "7e093a8d213a2a197243bcb73c11e6fd5a5af934d36aa639b9f2f28296658d8e", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845826.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02845826.pdf", + "size": 360529, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 3, + "chars": 6236, + "elapsed": 0.8348187679657713, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845826/EFTA02845826.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "a3a823069421b0b57853e331856510b720713e0d4ce897c2e80ffb43f927b074": { + "sha": "a3a823069421b0b57853e331856510b720713e0d4ce897c2e80ffb43f927b074", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845829.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02845829.pdf", + "size": 61351, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 1, + "chars": 717, + "elapsed": 0.7026831000111997, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845829/EFTA02845829.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "292e540ea4e33b050af71192f6bd5116b1264f7261ad4178fff1b8274e683fd1": { + "sha": "292e540ea4e33b050af71192f6bd5116b1264f7261ad4178fff1b8274e683fd1", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845830.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02845830.pdf", + "size": 64442, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 1, + "chars": 765, + "elapsed": 0.7136101289652288, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845830/EFTA02845830.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "6860d2a72dfe20a97f31472aa81e8dcc32e05552b972aa6362acd68a4df88421": { + "sha": "6860d2a72dfe20a97f31472aa81e8dcc32e05552b972aa6362acd68a4df88421", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845831.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02845831.pdf", + "size": 80626, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 1, + "chars": 686, + "elapsed": 5.143213296076283, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845831/EFTA02845831.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "72532dd30343166688bedf2e57256c583ee6a73b46c058283a14e4634e01f3b6": { + "sha": "72532dd30343166688bedf2e57256c583ee6a73b46c058283a14e4634e01f3b6", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845832.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02845832.pdf", + "size": 1207292, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 15, + "chars": 18521, + "elapsed": 2.4098272420233116, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845832/EFTA02845832.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "c30829a6d1b90f65f08950e1ff8302cc8c1a2f9c6ca9bd496be4ea2dc32a67ba": { + "sha": "c30829a6d1b90f65f08950e1ff8302cc8c1a2f9c6ca9bd496be4ea2dc32a67ba", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845847.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02845847.pdf", + "size": 96378, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1442, + "elapsed": 0.892943806014955, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845847/EFTA02845847.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "2b150f4babc19183796bf5282f7f14c90ae9b947071aed8a7e16eebfe5b099a3": { + "sha": "2b150f4babc19183796bf5282f7f14c90ae9b947071aed8a7e16eebfe5b099a3", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845848.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02845848.pdf", + "size": 95757, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1383, + "elapsed": 1.01853497303091, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845848/EFTA02845848.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "f8df9401ec7e39b5746a78e9c9409efe28288e46b9f873c7e8196e9514b14c07": { + "sha": "f8df9401ec7e39b5746a78e9c9409efe28288e46b9f873c7e8196e9514b14c07", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845849.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02845849.pdf", + "size": 96172, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1381, + "elapsed": 0.998903181985952, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845849/EFTA02845849.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "930d1cb0639aea40afc159b7fb0519663cac906f50d142ed28ee1819f474da6b": { + "sha": "930d1cb0639aea40afc159b7fb0519663cac906f50d142ed28ee1819f474da6b", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845850.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02845850.pdf", + "size": 66409, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 1, + "chars": 780, + "elapsed": 0.775324646034278, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845850/EFTA02845850.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "ca6a2c17b3d378530487e4e3ba68b458525bb3185ee39121d76e9d21e32016dd": { + "sha": "ca6a2c17b3d378530487e4e3ba68b458525bb3185ee39121d76e9d21e32016dd", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845851.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02845851.pdf", + "size": 79038, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1039, + "elapsed": 0.748560355976224, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845851/EFTA02845851.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "87af66ed6521130c23a8bf4337a8e0594bccc6bc86a8c5b9cac9c5963cdbd655": { + "sha": "87af66ed6521130c23a8bf4337a8e0594bccc6bc86a8c5b9cac9c5963cdbd655", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845852.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02845852.pdf", + "size": 3680340, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 38, + "chars": 60559, + "elapsed": 15.67677066498436, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845852/EFTA02845852.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "d0856330600b4818254d4539c8c29b27a802439232ae5e6520b9ccf6ac52c08d": { + "sha": "d0856330600b4818254d4539c8c29b27a802439232ae5e6520b9ccf6ac52c08d", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845890.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02845890.pdf", + "size": 133961, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 1, + "chars": 2157, + "elapsed": 0.7255090720718727, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845890/EFTA02845890.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "5a1a430ec02eb914dd5749f3fe3ca00d80e884763bdb278b1ae8d37c9b2cdba1": { + "sha": "5a1a430ec02eb914dd5749f3fe3ca00d80e884763bdb278b1ae8d37c9b2cdba1", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845891.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02845891.pdf", + "size": 3770348, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 34, + "chars": 71097, + "elapsed": 3.486892279004678, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845891/EFTA02845891.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "eb7b41b43fa153d0e9b6dd7362f27b477a473ece93c4cddf04bf89836d861eb8": { + "sha": "eb7b41b43fa153d0e9b6dd7362f27b477a473ece93c4cddf04bf89836d861eb8", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845925.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02845925.pdf", + "size": 982851, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 9, + "chars": 16460, + "elapsed": 1.1843906120629981, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845925/EFTA02845925.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "533c6efec368b8218690f34bccc601617255e869e703b77a0ee0664d9a4fbfa0": { + "sha": "533c6efec368b8218690f34bccc601617255e869e703b77a0ee0664d9a4fbfa0", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845934.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02845934.pdf", + "size": 98790, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1427, + "elapsed": 0.9648814640240744, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845934/EFTA02845934.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "81073f94a697d2b127800b94fc5ed1615e573b14e04edca390a088c04d83eafd": { + "sha": "81073f94a697d2b127800b94fc5ed1615e573b14e04edca390a088c04d83eafd", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845935.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02845935.pdf", + "size": 97011, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1448, + "elapsed": 0.8118922320427373, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845935/EFTA02845935.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "32d11d57f4e437c0cb722adb74299c7394061ff6811cb0a27bcbbf5a272765ba": { + "sha": "32d11d57f4e437c0cb722adb74299c7394061ff6811cb0a27bcbbf5a272765ba", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845936.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02845936.pdf", + "size": 99311, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1281, + "elapsed": 0.9682230269536376, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845936/EFTA02845936.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "36cd94681bb75cce2fefc51ada0106334ed9b6595e126a43649038a49090a237": { + "sha": "36cd94681bb75cce2fefc51ada0106334ed9b6595e126a43649038a49090a237", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845937.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02845937.pdf", + "size": 122087, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1040, + "elapsed": 1.1546063540736213, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845937/EFTA02845937.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "b13a1ec8a946b5155b58cab2a1abc3f6b6de9799b69bfd0e86385e02ac4e17ca": { + "sha": "b13a1ec8a946b5155b58cab2a1abc3f6b6de9799b69bfd0e86385e02ac4e17ca", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845938.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02845938.pdf", + "size": 122509, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 1, + "chars": 992, + "elapsed": 0.7281979649560526, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845938/EFTA02845938.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "ebaa0175d2a3ec2058af602297bc0b38c7693382009ba92bf4a1ceeb312b41af": { + "sha": "ebaa0175d2a3ec2058af602297bc0b38c7693382009ba92bf4a1ceeb312b41af", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845939.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02845939.pdf", + "size": 94773, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1180, + "elapsed": 1.106023120926693, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845939/EFTA02845939.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "7ac1ac84d5c5ae64d6891f561fab8bf0e531606448f9a23a4c0531bdd1409d81": { + "sha": "7ac1ac84d5c5ae64d6891f561fab8bf0e531606448f9a23a4c0531bdd1409d81", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845940.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02845940.pdf", + "size": 112440, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1325, + "elapsed": 1.1405589040368795, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845940/EFTA02845940.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "e2a255496276a7490551f6359bf05cfbed2143805cd5f28118c6b16302eee7ec": { + "sha": "e2a255496276a7490551f6359bf05cfbed2143805cd5f28118c6b16302eee7ec", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845941.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02845941.pdf", + "size": 78731, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1103, + "elapsed": 0.6876997560029849, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845941/EFTA02845941.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "61e97d3ffedd4428391249a0565b3f7a25bd3a0f125516cfb45502339638d973": { + "sha": "61e97d3ffedd4428391249a0565b3f7a25bd3a0f125516cfb45502339638d973", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845942.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02845942.pdf", + "size": 44569, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 1, + "chars": 463, + "elapsed": 0.6726253280648962, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845942/EFTA02845942.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "f83e93ba7ee74047fc662ab1f52abaf1d77d503c078c0f63b85ba20a4bba165f": { + "sha": "f83e93ba7ee74047fc662ab1f52abaf1d77d503c078c0f63b85ba20a4bba165f", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845943.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02845943.pdf", + "size": 55710, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 1, + "chars": 679, + "elapsed": 0.6250622910447419, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845943/EFTA02845943.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "9c5393fb07b6983369efd74952990011a007ff28fbb254ee191a244c1b15d7fc": { + "sha": "9c5393fb07b6983369efd74952990011a007ff28fbb254ee191a244c1b15d7fc", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845944.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02845944.pdf", + "size": 79585, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1123, + "elapsed": 0.6674077289644629, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845944/EFTA02845944.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "0823ee57aa80a436e32d6b0e86d30ffa5a018cb86bae398b6c0e91c0f6c58557": { + "sha": "0823ee57aa80a436e32d6b0e86d30ffa5a018cb86bae398b6c0e91c0f6c58557", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845945.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02845945.pdf", + "size": 95024, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1178, + "elapsed": 1.3040228050667793, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845945/EFTA02845945.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "5be09663c0fc5979fe151212c71010d34f6ffc12219458b0bbb55d1c2bc45545": { + "sha": "5be09663c0fc5979fe151212c71010d34f6ffc12219458b0bbb55d1c2bc45545", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845946.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02845946.pdf", + "size": 112611, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1320, + "elapsed": 1.2641332569764927, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845946/EFTA02845946.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "f6051fb99e003bf896e4765ca095feaab79d9751886a02e535bf2202137949cc": { + "sha": "f6051fb99e003bf896e4765ca095feaab79d9751886a02e535bf2202137949cc", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845947.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02845947.pdf", + "size": 78755, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1197, + "elapsed": 0.9329257960198447, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845947/EFTA02845947.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "1d7ec68057810e8b94ad5c0d4e83e9d2cc4a57088a32efa7927f37d88ddc8d42": { + "sha": "1d7ec68057810e8b94ad5c0d4e83e9d2cc4a57088a32efa7927f37d88ddc8d42", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845948.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02845948.pdf", + "size": 89069, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1366, + "elapsed": 0.7177107470342889, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845948/EFTA02845948.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "f93fd945ab1786e052edbc5538a477345b4225c765b4b3c32dd77e0c71f009c0": { + "sha": "f93fd945ab1786e052edbc5538a477345b4225c765b4b3c32dd77e0c71f009c0", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845949.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02845949.pdf", + "size": 79316, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1116, + "elapsed": 0.6811339639825746, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845949/EFTA02845949.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "02e75a5573bc3e66429e9dabd7bb7657d20d3c97e68788ab1275e3178e704b0c": { + "sha": "02e75a5573bc3e66429e9dabd7bb7657d20d3c97e68788ab1275e3178e704b0c", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845950.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02845950.pdf", + "size": 162320, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 2, + "chars": 2598, + "elapsed": 1.056375790038146, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845950/EFTA02845950.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "16015020c8b6cf49e14ea416ce940b454d2e9a95220e07c4ca93508111d5e48a": { + "sha": "16015020c8b6cf49e14ea416ce940b454d2e9a95220e07c4ca93508111d5e48a", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845952.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02845952.pdf", + "size": 75970, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1055, + "elapsed": 0.7040567520307377, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845952/EFTA02845952.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "daff43443122b0af457ab68d2ee54c1401f1410a56a874e2129788a5e01f26cc": { + "sha": "daff43443122b0af457ab68d2ee54c1401f1410a56a874e2129788a5e01f26cc", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845953.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02845953.pdf", + "size": 231331, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 3, + "chars": 3718, + "elapsed": 0.7950765480054542, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845953/EFTA02845953.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "4ffcd26735f8c0ee52cfc5f2f686ec87fe573149efc32369c0040d5173635d21": { + "sha": "4ffcd26735f8c0ee52cfc5f2f686ec87fe573149efc32369c0040d5173635d21", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845956.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02845956.pdf", + "size": 502978, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 5, + "chars": 8463, + "elapsed": 1.1108257150044665, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845956/EFTA02845956.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "df84ee9863411470569ddf3343275a27a410be2f4eae5328f855a898de0bccef": { + "sha": "df84ee9863411470569ddf3343275a27a410be2f4eae5328f855a898de0bccef", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845961.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02845961.pdf", + "size": 83397, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1044, + "elapsed": 1.1328268270008266, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845961/EFTA02845961.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "e815229a592e59ca68c3fbcc1516585cc0f305e43291ebef60b9ef24c6af140d": { + "sha": "e815229a592e59ca68c3fbcc1516585cc0f305e43291ebef60b9ef24c6af140d", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845962.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02845962.pdf", + "size": 88457, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 1, + "chars": 982, + "elapsed": 1.1856121720047668, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845962/EFTA02845962.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "6965296a2c499f59b831dfa3d52c0d44849423efcd4d0ae7b82f1b2c54ae0fae": { + "sha": "6965296a2c499f59b831dfa3d52c0d44849423efcd4d0ae7b82f1b2c54ae0fae", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845963.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02845963.pdf", + "size": 658185, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 5, + "chars": 8239, + "elapsed": 1.168047943036072, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845963/EFTA02845963.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "dc0065ffaaa55ff48d6034f1327f2ad599900115a2a3cff6b30cf048e2fbbbf9": { + "sha": "dc0065ffaaa55ff48d6034f1327f2ad599900115a2a3cff6b30cf048e2fbbbf9", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845968.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02845968.pdf", + "size": 60509, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 1, + "chars": 809, + "elapsed": 1.1339819199638441, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845968/EFTA02845968.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "449af5ddfb205f3c99a9fd336eb65cba0b54b91c85c842d6515807a95f17a60b": { + "sha": "449af5ddfb205f3c99a9fd336eb65cba0b54b91c85c842d6515807a95f17a60b", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845969.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02845969.pdf", + "size": 75905, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 1, + "chars": 973, + "elapsed": 1.0737479709787294, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845969/EFTA02845969.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "9c15b6c45ea1c5e35c0e0260f4b896715f23b7d00fcc686a718a21af99555e60": { + "sha": "9c15b6c45ea1c5e35c0e0260f4b896715f23b7d00fcc686a718a21af99555e60", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845970.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02845970.pdf", + "size": 87391, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1259, + "elapsed": 0.7254616710124537, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845970/EFTA02845970.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "0704dfc9793a0012461ffdeb5ee53f610ce5ab8423836038656aefb55c738504": { + "sha": "0704dfc9793a0012461ffdeb5ee53f610ce5ab8423836038656aefb55c738504", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845971.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02845971.pdf", + "size": 42939, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 1, + "chars": 432, + "elapsed": 0.8391304210526869, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845971/EFTA02845971.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "f79ee0926dd1b7dfc9c8a6dd58e497be09332599d973fe68e37f4ef0f1d32854": { + "sha": "f79ee0926dd1b7dfc9c8a6dd58e497be09332599d973fe68e37f4ef0f1d32854", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845972.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02845972.pdf", + "size": 195874, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 3, + "chars": 2058, + "elapsed": 0.7227085549384356, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845972/EFTA02845972.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "54a62f1c960084504536b4dea0f93a9953fb927617303cb8cd44de338b687ab4": { + "sha": "54a62f1c960084504536b4dea0f93a9953fb927617303cb8cd44de338b687ab4", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845975.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02845975.pdf", + "size": 225087, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 3, + "chars": 1989, + "elapsed": 2.4897538379300386, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845975/EFTA02845975.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "c55f106415dd6e5a7a25cdad09b627e6884cca763c67825aaf3afd43758d0ef0": { + "sha": "c55f106415dd6e5a7a25cdad09b627e6884cca763c67825aaf3afd43758d0ef0", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845978.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02845978.pdf", + "size": 63619, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 1, + "chars": 730, + "elapsed": 0.5668235949706286, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845978/EFTA02845978.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "fdb6c947ff51c86e60c5bd74b885c2e4cd3e54d67bed864a1383bff578124add": { + "sha": "fdb6c947ff51c86e60c5bd74b885c2e4cd3e54d67bed864a1383bff578124add", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845979.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02845979.pdf", + "size": 124955, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 1, + "chars": 1776, + "elapsed": 0.8592630820348859, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845979/EFTA02845979.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + }, + "8571167dab66ed57cfa4a55276f692974944ab3db01264070edf3b058d57ddbf": { + "sha": "8571167dab66ed57cfa4a55276f692974944ab3db01264070edf3b058d57ddbf", + "path": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/raw/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845980.pdf", + "name": "EFTA02845980.pdf", + "size": 73620, + "status": "done", + "fingerprint": "d889ea60d5548ac4", + "engine": { + "marker_major": "2", + "marker_version": "2.0.0", + "mode": "balanced", + "use_llm": false, + "force_ocr": false, + "disable_ocr": false, + "output_format": "markdown", + "preserve_source": false + }, + "worker": null, + "claimed_at": null, + "pages": 1, + "chars": 782, + "elapsed": 0.8152533039683476, + "output": "/home/robbd/my/apps/epstein-index/data/ocr-marker2/court-us-v-noel/EFTA02845980/EFTA02845980.md", + "error": "", + "backend": "local", + "attempts": 1, + "warnings": [] + } + } +} \ No newline at end of file