---
title: "House Oversight: Estate Documents (Nov 12) (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013394)"
source: "House Oversight: Estate Documents (Nov 12)"
sourceUrl: "https://www.justice.gov/epstein"
date: "2026-01-01"
category: "House Oversight"
eftaNumber: "HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013394"
ocrPages: 1
ocrChars: 1210
ocrElapsed: 0.0
parseTier: "external-legacy"
engine: "engine undisclosed (ep-nov-12.greg.technology mirror)"
externalSource: "greg-ep-nov-12"
externalLicense: "not granted"
externalCredit: "ep-nov-12.greg.technology"
externalUrl: "https://ep-nov-12.greg.technology"
---

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE
FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND
FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Plaintiff(s),
VS.
SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually,
BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and
L.M., individually,
Defendant(s).
COUNTER-PLAINTIFE, EDWARDS' SECOND RENEWED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO
ASSERT CLAIM FOR PUNITIVE DAMAGES
Counter-plaintiff, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, moves this Honorable Court for entry of an
Order granting him leave to assert a claim for punitive damages against the Counter-defendant,
JEFFREY EPSTEIN, and in support thereof would show that the evidence summarized herein
satisfies the statutory prerequisites for the assertion of a punitive damage claim. Specifically, the
evidence establishes that EPSTEIN's Complaint against EDWARDS;
was filed in the total absence of evidence to support any allegation of wrongdoing
on the part of EDWARDS;
was filed in the total absence of evidence that EPSTEIN had sustained damage as
a consequence of any misconduct other than his own well-established criminal
enterprise;
was filed in the absence of any intention to meet his own obligation to provide
relevant and material discovery;
EXHIBIT
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013394