--- title: "DOJ Epstein Files, Data Set 9 (EFTA00102012)" source: "DOJ Epstein Files, Data Set 9" sourceUrl: "https://huggingface.co/datasets/ishumilin/epstein-files-ocr-complete" date: "2026-01-01" category: "DOJ Data Set" eftaNumber: "EFTA00102012" ocrPages: 0 ocrChars: 3903 ocrElapsed: 0.0 parseTier: "external" engine: "ishumilin OCR pipeline (engine undisclosed; CC0 mirror)" externalSource: "ishumilin-ocr-complete" externalLicense: "CC0-1.0" externalCredit: "ishumilin/epstein-files-ocr-complete (Hugging Face)" externalUrl: "https://huggingface.co/datasets/ishumilin/epstein-files-ocr-complete" --- Subject: Re: Epstein FOIA case, Times v. BOP, 20-cv-833 Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2021 00:21:40 +0000 Great. Thank you for the quick turnaround! No issues from the Tartaglione team. Thanks, ```markdown Sent: Thursday, January 7, 2021 7:14 PM ``` Subject: Re: Epstein FOIA case, Times v. BOP, 20-cv-833 For Tartaglione there are not, but there are records showing Epstein attorney visits in there. On Jan 7, 2021, at 7:05 PM, Hey - I will look now, but first, can you confirm there are no visit logs or count slops reflecting attorney visits in here? **Sent:** Thursday, January 7, 2021 7:04 PM Subject: RE: Epstein FOIA case, Times v. BOP, 20-cv-833 Before greenlighting the Epstein FOIA production tomorrow, I wanted to make sure that you were okay with the 26 pages BOP sent yesterday (attached) from the Tartaglione perspective. I think the only mentions of Tartaglione are on the last two pages, where his name is on a SHU roster and redacted. I assume no issues from the Tartaglione team, but please let me know. Thanks and sorry for the tight turnaround here. Thanks, Subject: RE: Epstein FOIA case, Times v. BOP, 20-cv-833 All. Following up on the below: for some reason, EFTA00102012 please note that I segregated in separate folders the attorney and social visit log pages in the production version and the attorney and social visit log pages and the count slips in the translucent version--no count slips in the production version because they are withheld in full.) Please let me know if you have any issues with these new pages, or with the production version (which, to be clear, should just be the pages in the translucent version that are not withheld in full, with the green no longer translucent). This has to be produced by Friday so, if possible, please let me know of any questions or concerns by eod tomorrow (Thursday). Subject: RE: Epstein FOIA case, Times v. BOP, 20-cv-833 translucent pages for review (they sent a final count of pages that does not line up with what we have). I am following up with them on short notice before the production on Friday. I will follow up once I have more information from BOP about the discrepancies here. redacted to show Epstein's name (similar to the census roster discussion below). Please let me know if you have any concerns. EFTA00102013 EFTA00102014 Subject: RE: Epstein FOIA case, Times v. BOP, 20-cv-833 Thanks, . Just so I understand – the redactions in the documents themselves are marked b6 and b7c. I am only attesting to b7a redactions, right? I could be wrong, but not everything that is marked green, I think, requires a 7a redaction as opposed to for a privacy reason. Subject: RE: Epstein FOIA case, Times v. BOP, 20-cv-833 Happy New Year. I’m following up on the Epstein FOIA and the plan we put together last month. BOP has completed its review of the documents provide The final production date is this Friday, 01/08. Your declaration supporting is due next Friday, 01/15. In advance of this Friday’s production, we wanted to make sure you are okay with update the docs in the folder and let you know. Please let us know if you have any concerns about the withholdings or any questions. Thanks, **Sent:** Saturday, December 5, 2020 8:28 PM To: EFTA00102015 Subject: RE: Epstein FOIA case, Times v. BOP, 20-cv-833 Hi - no problem, I can do it, and those dates should work for me. ```markdown Sent: Saturday, December 5, 2020 4:37 PM ``` To: Subject: Epstein FOIA case, Times v. BOP, 20-cv-833 I hope you’re doing well. I’m writing to check in on the Epstein FOIA case, *Times v. BOP*, 20-cv-833. By way of a brief recap Please let me know if this proposed schedule works, or if you have any questions or concerns. I’m happy to discuss on a call if helpful. Thanks, Assistant United States Attorney 86 Chambers Street, Third Floor New York, NY 10007 EFTA00102016