Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
scope
stringclasses
3 values
metric
stringlengths
14
54
count
int64
0
950
denominator
int64
9
1.03k
percent
float64
0
100
methodology
methodology.observationFailureRate
2
1,030
0.2
overall
overall.dmarcAdoption
836
1,028
81.3
overall
overall.dmarcEnforcement
466
836
55.7
overall
overall.noAggregateReporting
115
836
13.8
overall
overall.spfAdoption
926
1,028
90.1
overall
overall.multipleSpfRecords
2
1,028
0.2
overall
overall.spfLookupFailure
30
926
3.2
overall
overall.bimiAdoption
18
1,028
1.8
overall
overall.bimiAmongEnforcing
18
466
3.9
overall
overall.withMx
950
1,028
92.4
byDimension
byDimension.country.0.metrics.dmarcAdoption
836
1,028
81.3
byDimension
byDimension.country.0.metrics.dmarcEnforcement
466
836
55.7
byDimension
byDimension.country.0.metrics.noAggregateReporting
115
836
13.8
byDimension
byDimension.country.0.metrics.spfAdoption
926
1,028
90.1
byDimension
byDimension.country.0.metrics.multipleSpfRecords
2
1,028
0.2
byDimension
byDimension.country.0.metrics.spfLookupFailure
30
926
3.2
byDimension
byDimension.country.0.metrics.bimiAdoption
18
1,028
1.8
byDimension
byDimension.country.0.metrics.bimiAmongEnforcing
18
466
3.9
byDimension
byDimension.country.0.metrics.withMx
950
1,028
92.4
byDimension
byDimension.region.0.metrics.dmarcAdoption
413
556
74.3
byDimension
byDimension.region.0.metrics.dmarcEnforcement
250
413
60.5
byDimension
byDimension.region.0.metrics.noAggregateReporting
90
413
21.8
byDimension
byDimension.region.0.metrics.spfAdoption
508
556
91.4
byDimension
byDimension.region.0.metrics.multipleSpfRecords
2
556
0.4
byDimension
byDimension.region.0.metrics.spfLookupFailure
21
508
4.1
byDimension
byDimension.region.0.metrics.bimiAdoption
10
556
1.8
byDimension
byDimension.region.0.metrics.bimiAmongEnforcing
10
250
4
byDimension
byDimension.region.0.metrics.withMx
521
556
93.7
byDimension
byDimension.region.1.metrics.dmarcAdoption
186
215
86.5
byDimension
byDimension.region.1.metrics.dmarcEnforcement
54
186
29
byDimension
byDimension.region.1.metrics.noAggregateReporting
4
186
2.2
byDimension
byDimension.region.1.metrics.spfAdoption
180
215
83.7
byDimension
byDimension.region.1.metrics.multipleSpfRecords
0
215
0
byDimension
byDimension.region.1.metrics.spfLookupFailure
5
180
2.8
byDimension
byDimension.region.1.metrics.bimiAdoption
1
215
0.5
byDimension
byDimension.region.1.metrics.bimiAmongEnforcing
1
54
1.9
byDimension
byDimension.region.1.metrics.withMx
188
215
87.4
byDimension
byDimension.region.2.metrics.dmarcAdoption
94
98
95.9
byDimension
byDimension.region.2.metrics.dmarcEnforcement
79
94
84
byDimension
byDimension.region.2.metrics.noAggregateReporting
3
94
3.2
byDimension
byDimension.region.2.metrics.spfAdoption
93
98
94.9
byDimension
byDimension.region.2.metrics.multipleSpfRecords
0
98
0
byDimension
byDimension.region.2.metrics.spfLookupFailure
1
93
1.1
byDimension
byDimension.region.2.metrics.bimiAdoption
4
98
4.1
byDimension
byDimension.region.2.metrics.bimiAmongEnforcing
4
79
5.1
byDimension
byDimension.region.2.metrics.withMx
93
98
94.9
byDimension
byDimension.region.3.metrics.dmarcAdoption
35
37
94.6
byDimension
byDimension.region.3.metrics.dmarcEnforcement
19
35
54.3
byDimension
byDimension.region.3.metrics.noAggregateReporting
3
35
8.6
byDimension
byDimension.region.3.metrics.spfAdoption
35
37
94.6
byDimension
byDimension.region.3.metrics.multipleSpfRecords
0
37
0
byDimension
byDimension.region.3.metrics.spfLookupFailure
2
35
5.7
byDimension
byDimension.region.3.metrics.bimiAdoption
2
37
5.4
byDimension
byDimension.region.3.metrics.bimiAmongEnforcing
2
19
10.5
byDimension
byDimension.region.3.metrics.withMx
36
37
97.3
byDimension
byDimension.region.4.metrics.dmarcAdoption
34
35
97.1
byDimension
byDimension.region.4.metrics.dmarcEnforcement
26
34
76.5
byDimension
byDimension.region.4.metrics.noAggregateReporting
4
34
11.8
byDimension
byDimension.region.4.metrics.spfAdoption
33
35
94.3
byDimension
byDimension.region.4.metrics.multipleSpfRecords
0
35
0
byDimension
byDimension.region.4.metrics.spfLookupFailure
0
33
0
byDimension
byDimension.region.4.metrics.bimiAdoption
0
35
0
byDimension
byDimension.region.4.metrics.bimiAmongEnforcing
0
26
0
byDimension
byDimension.region.4.metrics.withMx
34
35
97.1
byDimension
byDimension.sector.0.metrics.dmarcAdoption
305
439
69.5
byDimension
byDimension.sector.0.metrics.dmarcEnforcement
188
305
61.6
byDimension
byDimension.sector.0.metrics.noAggregateReporting
78
305
25.6
byDimension
byDimension.sector.0.metrics.spfAdoption
399
439
90.9
byDimension
byDimension.sector.0.metrics.multipleSpfRecords
2
439
0.5
byDimension
byDimension.sector.0.metrics.spfLookupFailure
17
399
4.3
byDimension
byDimension.sector.0.metrics.bimiAdoption
2
439
0.5
byDimension
byDimension.sector.0.metrics.bimiAmongEnforcing
2
188
1.1
byDimension
byDimension.sector.0.metrics.withMx
409
439
93.2
byDimension
byDimension.sector.1.metrics.dmarcAdoption
229
247
92.7
byDimension
byDimension.sector.1.metrics.dmarcEnforcement
141
229
61.6
byDimension
byDimension.sector.1.metrics.noAggregateReporting
31
229
13.5
byDimension
byDimension.sector.1.metrics.spfAdoption
232
247
93.9
byDimension
byDimension.sector.1.metrics.multipleSpfRecords
0
247
0
byDimension
byDimension.sector.1.metrics.spfLookupFailure
8
232
3.4
byDimension
byDimension.sector.1.metrics.bimiAdoption
4
247
1.6
byDimension
byDimension.sector.1.metrics.bimiAmongEnforcing
4
141
2.8
byDimension
byDimension.sector.1.metrics.withMx
238
247
96.4
byDimension
byDimension.sector.2.metrics.dmarcAdoption
198
228
86.8
byDimension
byDimension.sector.2.metrics.dmarcEnforcement
61
198
30.8
byDimension
byDimension.sector.2.metrics.noAggregateReporting
5
198
2.5
byDimension
byDimension.sector.2.metrics.spfAdoption
191
228
83.8
byDimension
byDimension.sector.2.metrics.multipleSpfRecords
0
228
0
byDimension
byDimension.sector.2.metrics.spfLookupFailure
5
191
2.6
byDimension
byDimension.sector.2.metrics.bimiAdoption
1
228
0.4
byDimension
byDimension.sector.2.metrics.bimiAmongEnforcing
1
61
1.6
byDimension
byDimension.sector.2.metrics.withMx
199
228
87.3
byDimension
byDimension.sector.3.metrics.dmarcAdoption
66
70
94.3
byDimension
byDimension.sector.3.metrics.dmarcEnforcement
57
66
86.4
byDimension
byDimension.sector.3.metrics.noAggregateReporting
1
66
1.5
byDimension
byDimension.sector.3.metrics.spfAdoption
66
70
94.3
byDimension
byDimension.sector.3.metrics.multipleSpfRecords
0
70
0
byDimension
byDimension.sector.3.metrics.spfLookupFailure
0
66
0
byDimension
byDimension.sector.3.metrics.bimiAdoption
11
70
15.7
byDimension
byDimension.sector.3.metrics.bimiAmongEnforcing
11
57
19.3
byDimension
byDimension.sector.3.metrics.withMx
66
70
94.3
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio

Palisade State of DMARC 2026 and derivative benchmarks

Aggregate public-DNS measurements behind Palisade's 2026 email-authentication research. This mirror keeps the State of DMARC parent dataset and three separately sourced, aggregate-only derivative studies on one citation surface.

Included datasets

The State of DMARC 2026: enforcement across the top 100,000 domains

The pinned Tranco top-100,000 parent study observed 99,310 domains. Files: state-of-dmarc-2026.csv and state-of-dmarc-2026.json.

Observed MX provider benchmark 2026

A rank-adjusted comparison of DMARC, reporting, SPF and BIMI deployment by observed MX operator across the Tranco top 100,000 domains.

Canada and Quebec email-authentication benchmark 2026

DMARC, SPF, BIMI and observed MX deployment across sourced Canadian public institutions, listed companies and major organizational systems.

North American MSP email-authentication benchmark 2026

Aggregate DMARC, reporting, SPF and BIMI measurements across 500+ MSP organizational domains listed in Clutch's U.S. and Canada markets.

Responsible data release

Only reviewed aggregate statistics are included. The mirror intentionally excludes per-domain scan results, organization mappings, contact details, licensed directory descriptions and election-office observations. Every percentage retains its numerator and denominator; source restrictions and limitations remain in each JSON publication object and canonical report.

Citation

Cite the canonical page for the specific derivative study you use. For the parent dataset, cite: Chenard, Samuel. (2026). The State of DMARC 2026: Enforcement Across the Top 100,000 Domains (Version 1.4) [Data set]. Palisade. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21924607

Downloads last month
127