sixstringzen's picture
fix(eval): correct blind-judge attribution and prompt matching
e3d37d5 verified
|
Raw History Blame Contribute Delete
1.3 kB

Hemmingway analysis correction

Correction, 2026-09-22

Analysis revision 2 replaces the first published aggregate tables. The original analyzer hashed anonymous case numbers where the packet builder used prompt IDs. It also compared different prompts when joining normal and reversed packets. Both errors affected win/loss attribution and score differences. Correcting the join changes order-agreement rates from 39.6/48.5/42.6% to 89.1/85.1/83.2%.

The study used 15 prompts per quant, not the previously reported 14. The 14 files are paired packets. We removed the intervals that treated dependent ratings as independent samples. Generations and judge responses are unchanged. The previous automated package reviews did not detect these analysis errors; their PASS verdicts do not validate the corrected results.

Condition Wins Losses Ties Ratings Win % Loss % Tie %
Hosted subset 51 10 5 66 77.3 15.2 7.6
oQ2e 31 58 1 90 34.4 64.4 1.1
oQ3.5e 44 42 4 90 48.9 46.7 4.4
oQ3e 54 35 1 90 60.0 38.9 1.1
oQ4e 30 43 17 90 33.3 47.8 18.9
oQ6e 34 19 37 90 37.8 21.1 41.1
oQ8e 27 22 41 90 30.0 24.4 45.6