Datasets:
Dataset Card for Badr Fiqh Retrieval Triplets
Dataset Description
Badr Fiqh Retrieval Triplets is an Arabic dataset developed for fine-tuning dense retrieval and sentence-embedding models for Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh). Each sample contains a question–positive–negative training triplet together with the title and primary school of the source book.
The hard negatives are deliberately selected from closely related fiqh contexts. A model must therefore distinguish passages that contain the requested ruling from passages that discuss a related issue without answering the question.
The dataset was introduced in What Makes a Good Fiqh Retriever? Answer Retrieval for Arabic Islamic Jurisprudence.
Dataset Overview
| Attribute | Description |
|---|---|
| Language | Arabic |
| Domain | Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh) |
| Task | Dense passage retrieval / sentence-embedding fine-tuning |
| Format | Triplets with source and madhhab metadata |
| Total size | 19,319 samples |
| Training split | 18,354 samples |
| Validation split | 965 samples |
Associated Resources
- Model: somayaeltanbouly/Badr_embedding_v0
- Paper: What Makes a Good Fiqh Retriever? Answer Retrieval for Arabic Islamic Jurisprudence
Supported Tasks and Uses
The dataset is intended primarily for:
- fine-tuning dense passage retrievers and sentence-embedding models;
- contrastive training with objectives such as
MultipleNegativesRankingLoss; - studying answer-bearing retrieval, where topical similarity alone is not sufficient for relevance.
This release contains fine-tuning triplets. It does not contain the 503-question retrieval test collection described separately in the paper.
Dataset Structure
Data Instance
Each line in the JSONL files follows this structure:
{
"anchor": "ما هي السنة الأولى من سنن الوضوء التي ذكرها أبو العباس أحمد الصاوي في كتابه حاشية الصاوي؟",
"positive": "وَهَلْ التَّثْلِيثُ وَالتَّفْرِيقُ...",
"negative": "...",
"source_title": "حاشية الصاوي على الشرح الصغير",
"mazhab": "مالكي"
}
Data Fields
| Field | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
anchor |
string |
An Arabic fiqh question. |
positive |
string |
The passage containing the ruling needed to answer the question. |
negative |
string |
A topically related hard negative that does not contain the requested ruling. |
source_title |
string |
The title of the source book from which the question and positive passage were derived. |
mazhab |
string |
The primary madhhab associated with the source book: حنفي, مالكي, شافعي, or حنبلي. |
The mazhab value represents the primary school of the source book and its
author.
Source Books
source_title |
mazhab |
|---|---|
| الإنصاف | حنبلي |
| الجوهرة النيرة | حنفي |
| حاشية الصاوي على الشرح الصغير | مالكي |
| حاشيتا قليوبي وعميرة | شافعي |
| درر الحكام شرح غرر الأحكام | حنفي |
Data Splits
| Split | Samples |
|---|---|
| Train | 18,354 |
| Validation | 965 |
| Total | 19,319 |
Five percent of the samples were reserved for validation using a fixed random seed of 42. The split was not stratified by topic, source, or school.
Distribution by School
The full dataset has the following source-school distribution:
| School | Samples |
|---|---|
| Shafi'i | 5,040 |
| Hanafi | 5,001 |
| Hanbali | 4,879 |
| Maliki | 4,399 |
| Total | 19,319 |
Loading and Using the Dataset
Load All Splits
from datasets import load_dataset
dataset = load_dataset("somayaeltanbouly/Badr_fiqh_retrieval")
print(dataset)
The expected structure is:
DatasetDict({
train: Dataset({
features: ['anchor', 'positive', 'negative', 'source_title', 'mazhab'],
num_rows: 18354
})
validation: Dataset({
features: ['anchor', 'positive', 'negative', 'source_title', 'mazhab'],
num_rows: 965
})
})
Filter by Madhhab or Source
# Select samples from Maliki sources
maliki_train = dataset["train"].filter(
lambda sample: sample["mazhab"] == "مالكي"
)
# Select samples from a specific source book
sawi_train = dataset["train"].filter(
lambda sample: sample["source_title"] == "حاشية الصاوي على الشرح الصغير"
)
Select Only Training Fields
When a training pipeline expects only the triplet columns, the metadata fields can be excluded without changing the original dataset:
triplets = dataset["train"].select_columns(
["anchor", "positive", "negative"]
)
Dataset Creation
Source Data
The samples were constructed from five classical fiqh books in the Jami' al-Fiqh corpus. These sources collectively represent the four Sunni schools. Passages were segmented by mas'alah (an individual juristic issue) to preserve the contextual boundaries of each ruling.
Question and Positive-Passage Construction
Questions were generated from source passages using Gemini 2.5 Flash. The model was prompted to produce question–answer pairs grounded in the supplied fiqh passage, including its original structural annotations. The source chunk was retained as the positive passage, and at most one question was kept for each chunk to reduce redundancy.
The prompts were developed in consultation with Islamic studies experts and refined through multiple review rounds. Generated batches were manually inspected during development to check that the questions were faithful to the source passages and reflected the intended rulings.
Hard-Negative Selection
For each question, a negative passage was selected from the same section as the positive passage but from a different subsection. This strategy produces negatives that are topically close to the question while not providing its specific requested ruling.
Records whose positive or negative passage exceeded 512 tokens under the
aubmindlab/bert-base-arabertv02 tokenizer were excluded.
Metadata
The source_title field was assigned from the structured source record. The
mazhab field was assigned according to the primary school associated with
the source book and its author. These fields use a controlled set of book
titles and Arabic school labels to support consistent filtering.
Language and Preprocessing
Questions are written in Modern Standard Arabic, while source passages contain the formal and classical Arabic characteristic of fiqh literature. No translation or romanization was applied. Users should expect orthographic and formatting variation typical of digitized classical texts.
Limitations and Responsible Use
- The dataset is intended for retrieval research and training, not for issuing independent religious rulings.
- Questions were generated automatically and may contain occasional wording artifacts despite manual quality checks.
- Each positive passage reflects its source text and context; it should not be interpreted as a universal fiqh position.
- The
mazhabfield identifies the source book's primary school, not every school or juristic opinion referenced in the passage. - A hard negative is non-answer-bearing for its paired question, but it may be relevant to another question or broader topic.
- The dataset is limited to five source books and does not represent the full diversity of fiqh literature.
- Downstream systems should preserve source attribution and school context when presenting retrieved passages.
Licensing Information
This dataset is released under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Citation
If you use this dataset, please cite the associated paper:
@misc{eltanbouly2026fiqhretriever,
title = {What Makes a Good Fiqh Retriever? Answer Retrieval for Arabic Islamic Jurisprudence},
author = {Somaya Eltanbouly and Heba Sbahi and Samer Rashwani and Abdessalam Bouchekif and Mutaz al-Khatib and Shahd Gaben and Mohammed Ghaly},
year = {2026},
eprint = {2608.20246},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
primaryClass = {cs.IR},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.20246}
}
Contact
For questions or feedback, please open a discussion on the dataset repository.
- Downloads last month
- 15