brand-voice-spec / SCHEMA.md
thehonestape's picture
Brand voice spec: reusable format + worked example (Lantern Coffee), with registers and closed-loop changelog
e9d26db verified
|
Raw History Blame Contribute Delete
2.85 kB

Brand Voice Spec — schema

voice.json is the canonical artifact. Everything in data/ is derived from it. The format is small on purpose: enough structure for a model to load and enforce, not so much that a human won't maintain it.

Top level

Field Type What it is
brand string The brand this voice belongs to.
status string sample for this reference; live for a real brand.
revision int Bumped every time a rule changes. Pairs with changelog.
registers object Named voices within one brand. Here: cafe (guest-facing) and trade (wholesale). A field can carry a register to say which voice it belongs to.
tone string[] Adjectives. The 30,000-foot read.
guidelines object[] The rules. See below.
doAndDont object[] Genuinely paired on-voice / off-voice examples.
surfaceDoDont object[] Per-surface guidance plus independent pools of good and bad examples.
promptKit object[] Reusable generation prompts, one per recurring writing job.
bannedTerms string[] Hard prohibitions.
preferredTerms string[] Reach-for-these words.
vocabulary object Concrete nouns grouped by domain.
signaturePhrases string[] Lines that are load-bearing for the brand.
changelog object[] One entry per revision. Each links to the correction that caused it.
voiceQueue object[] Captured corrections, adopted or pending. The input side of the loop.

guidelines[]

{
  "rule": "Talk like a regular, not a sommelier.",
  "derivedFrom": "Unpretentious",
  "explanation": "Tasting notes help people choose. Tasting poetry makes them feel dumb.",
  "derivedFromCorrection": "vn_0002"
}

derivedFromCorrection is the join to voiceQueue. It answers "why does this rule exist?" with a real correction, not a committee.

The loop

This is the part that matters. Most brand voice is written once and rots. This schema treats voice as a living artifact:

  1. A draft comes back wrong. Someone (a human or an agent) files a note in voiceQueue.
  2. During a periodic sweep, adopted notes become or amend guidelines.
  3. revision bumps and a changelog entry records the change, linked back to the note.
  4. The next generation reads the updated spec. The mistake does not repeat.

data/changelog.jsonl joins each revision to the correction that produced it, so you can read the voice's whole evolution as cause and effect.

Using it with a model

  • Put guidelines + bannedTerms + a few preference_pairs in the system prompt to steer generation.
  • Pick the right register for the surface you're writing.
  • Use promptKit entries as parameterized templates for recurring jobs.
  • Score output against bannedTerms and the rules as a cheap voice-lint.