pre_text: management 2019s discussion and analysis 120 jpmorgan chase & co./2010 annual report wholesale credit portfolio as of december 31 , 2010 , wholesale exposure ( ib , cb , tss and am ) increased by $ 36.9 billion from december 31 , 2009 . the overall increase was primarily driven by increases of $ 23.5 billion in loans and $ 16.8 billion of receivables from customers , partially offset by decreases in interests in purchase receivables and lending-related commitments of $ 2.5 billion and $ 1.1 billion , respectively . the de- crease in lending-related commitments and the increase in loans were primarily related to the january 1 , 2010 , adoption of the accounting guidance related to vies , which resulted in the elimination of a net $ 17.7 billion of lending-related commitments between the firm and its administrated multi-seller conduits upon consolidation . assets of the consolidated conduits included $ 15.1 billion of wholesale loans at january 1 , 2010 . excluding the effect of the accounting guidance , lending-related commitments and loans would have increased by $ 16.6 billion and $ 8.4 billion , respectively , mainly related to in- creased client activity . the increase in loans also included the pur- chase of a $ 3.5 billion loan portfolio in cb during the third quarter of 2010 . the increase of $ 16.8 billion in receivables from customers was due to increased client activity , predominantly in prime services . wholesale .
post_text: net credit derivative hedges notional ( d ) $ ( 23108 ) $ ( 48376 ) $ ( 55 ) $ ( 139 ) liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivatives ( e ) ( 16486 ) ( 15519 ) na na ( a ) represents primarily margin loans to prime and retail brokerage customers , which are included in accrued interest and accounts receivable on the consolidated balance sheets . ( b ) represents an ownership interest in cash flows of a pool of receivables transferred by a third-party seller into a bankruptcy-remote entity , generally a trust . ( c ) the amounts in nonperforming represent unfunded commitments that are risk rated as nonaccrual . ( d ) represents the net notional amount of protection purchased and sold of single-name and portfolio credit derivatives used to manage both performing and nonperform- ing credit exposures ; these derivatives do not qualify for hedge accounting under u.s . gaap . for additional information , see credit derivatives on pages 126 2013128 , and note 6 on pages 191 2013199 of this annual report . ( e ) represents other liquid securities collateral and other cash collateral held by the firm . ( f ) excludes assets acquired in loan satisfactions . the following table presents summaries of the maturity and ratings profiles of the wholesale portfolio as of december 31 , 2010 and 2009 . the ratings scale is based on the firm 2019s internal risk ratings , which generally correspond to the ratings as defined by s&p and moody 2019s . also included in this table is the notional value of net credit derivative hedges ; the counterparties to these hedges are predominantly investment grade banks and finance companies. .
table: December 31, Credit exposure Nonperforming (f)
table: (in millions) 2010 2009 2010 2009
table: Loans retained $222,510 $200,077 $5,510 $6,559
table: Loans held-for-sale 3,147 2,734 341 234
table: Loans at fair value 1,976 1,364 155 111
table: Loans– reported 227,633 204,175 6,006 6,904
table: Derivative receivables 80,481 80,210 34 529
table: Receivables from customers<sup>(a)</sup> 32,541 15,745 — —
table: Interests in purchased receivables<sup>(b)</sup> 391 2,927 — —
table: Total wholesale credit-related assets 341,046 303,057 6,040 7,433
table: Lending-related commitments<sup>(c)</sup> 346,079 347,155 1,005 1,577
table: Total wholesale credit exposure $687,125 $650,212 $7,045 $9,010
table: Net credit derivative hedges notional<sup>(d)</sup> $(23,108) $(48,376) $(55) $(139)
table: Liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivatives<sup>(e)</sup> (16,486) (15,519) NA NA
question: Analyse this data from a financial earnings document. what was the percentage change in loans retained from 2009 to 2010?