Datasets:
File size: 6,816 Bytes
b0e1a3f | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 | ---
license: cc-by-4.0
task_categories:
- other
language:
- ko
- en
tags:
- GIS
- benchmark
- geospatial
- LLM
- agent
- QGIS
- MCP
- spatial-analysis
pretty_name: GIS-Bench
size_categories:
- n<100
---
# GIS-Bench: A Benchmark for Evaluating LLM-based GIS Automation Agents
## Dataset Description
**GIS-Bench** is a benchmark framework designed to evaluate the capability of Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents in automating GIS (Geographic Information System) tasks using the Model Context Protocol (MCP).
This benchmark was developed as part of a master's thesis research and targets real-world spatial analysis workflows executable in QGIS Desktop via Claude + MCP integration.
- **Paper:** *GIS-Bench: LLM 기반 GIS 자동화 에이전트 평가 벤치마크* (KCC 2026, submitted)
- **Repository:** [yiseo0/GIS-Bench](https://huggingface.co/datasets/yiseo0/GIS-Bench)
- **License:** [CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
---
## Benchmark Overview
| Item | Details |
|------|---------|
| Total Tasks | 45 |
| Difficulty Levels | 3 (Level 1 / Level 2 / Level 3) |
| Task Type | GIS spatial analysis & visualization |
| Output Format | HTML (Leaflet.js map), PNG, JPG |
| Evaluation Method | VLM-based automated scoring (Claude Sonnet) |
| Scoring | 130-point raw → 100-point normalized |
| Pass Threshold | 60 points (normalized) |
---
## Evaluated Models
| Model | Condition | Pass Rate (Overall) |
|-------|-----------|-------------------|
| GPT-5.4-mini | Few-shot | 10.0% |
| GPT-5.2 | Few-shot | 36.0% |
| Claude (Sonnet) | Zero-shot | 60.0% |
| Claude (Sonnet) | Few-shot | 78.0% |
| Claude (Sonnet) + QGIS MCP | Agentic | **86.0%** |
> Statistical significance confirmed via McNemar's test (p < 0.05)
---
## Task Structure
Tasks are organized across 3 difficulty levels:
| Level | Description | Example |
|-------|-------------|---------|
| Level 1 | Basic data loading & visualization | Load a shapefile and display on map |
| Level 2 | Spatial filtering & styling | Filter buildings by area > 500㎡ with color coding |
| Level 3 | Multi-step spatial analysis (MCP-driven, server data access) | Load Landsat NDWI data via MCP and generate a landslide density heatmap using `native:heatmapkerneldensity` |
Each task entry includes:
- `task_no`: Task ID (1–45)
- `prompt`: Natural language instruction (Korean)
- `level`: Difficulty level (1, 2, or 3)
---
## Data Sources
All spatial datasets used in this benchmark are sourced from Korean public data portals under open licenses.
| 데이터명 | 실제 파일 | 형식 | 공간 유형 | 좌표계 | 출처 | 라이선스 |
|---------|---------|------|---------|--------|------|---------|
| 서울시 CCTV 설치 현황 | `few_shot_test_서울시 안심이 CCTV 연계 현황` | CSV | Point | EPSG:4326 (WGS84) | [서울 열린데이터광장](https://data.seoul.go.kr) | 공공누리 1유형 |
| 서울시 고도지구 경계 | `UQ123_용도지구(고도지구)_20250805` | SHP | Polygon | EPSG:5186 | [국토정보플랫폼](https://www.nsdi.go.kr) | 공공누리 1유형 |
| 서울시 행정경계 | `서울시_SIG.shp` | SHP | Polygon | EPSG:5186 | [공공데이터포털](https://www.data.go.kr) | 공공누리 1유형 |
| 수치표고모델 (DEM) | `(B080)공개DEM_34602_img_2025` | GeoTIFF | Raster | EPSG:5186 | [국토정보플랫폼](https://www.nsdi.go.kr) | 공공누리 1유형 |
| 고해상도 위성영상 | `Landsat_위성영상의_정규물지수_2024` | GeoTIFF | Raster | EPSG:5186 | [NASA EarthData](https://earthdata.nasa.gov) | Public Domain |
> All datasets are publicly available and free to use with attribution.
---
## Evaluation Pipeline
Evaluation is performed using **VLM-based automated scoring** with Claude Sonnet as the judge model.
### Scoring Criteria (130-point raw scale)
#### Basic Quality (100 pts)
| Criterion | Max Score | Description |
|-----------|-----------|-------------|
| `exists` | 20 | Meaningful visualization present |
| `accuracy` | 30 | Correct region and dataset used |
| `requirement` | 30 | Color, filter, buffer conditions met |
| `completeness` | 20 | Legend, title, labels complete |
#### Spatial Accuracy (30 pts)
| Criterion | Max Score | Description |
|-----------|-----------|-------------|
| `spatial_location` | 15 | Data displayed in correct geographic area |
| `geometry_validity` | 5 | No polygon/buffer distortion |
| `numeric_match` | 10 | Numeric conditions reflected in output |
**Normalization:** `score_normalized = round(total_raw / 130 * 100)`
Each task is evaluated **3 times** (N=3) and the average score is used for robustness.
See [`evaluation/eval_criteria.md`](evaluation/eval_criteria.md) for the full evaluation prompt and criteria details.
---
## Reference Outputs
Since GIS tasks do not always have a single deterministic "ground truth," this benchmark provides **reference outputs** — screenshots generated by the benchmark author under each task condition. These serve as visual references for what a correct result should look like.
Reference screenshots are provided in `assets/screenshots/` organized by model and task ID.
---
## MCP Tool Dependency
This benchmark was conducted using **QGIS MCP** to connect Claude to QGIS Desktop.
- **Tool:** [jjsantos01/qgis_mcp](https://github.com/jjsantos01/qgis_mcp)
- **Description:** MCP server + QGIS plugin that allows LLMs to control QGIS Desktop
- **Note:** The MCP tool code is not included in this repository. Please refer to the original repository for installation.
---
## Repository Structure
```
GIS-Bench/
├── README.md # This file (Dataset Card)
├── data/
│ └── tasks.json # 45 task prompts with level labels
├── evaluation/
│ ├── run_evaluation_vlm.py # VLM evaluation pipeline (5 models)
│ └── eval_criteria.md # Scoring criteria & judge prompt
├── results/
│ └── leaderboard.json # Evaluation results per model
└── assets/
└── screenshots/ # Reference output screenshots
```
---
## Citation
If you use GIS-Bench in your research, please cite:
```bibtex
@inproceedings{gisbench2026,
title = {GIS-Bench: LLM 기반 GIS 자동화 에이전트 평가 벤치마크},
author = {김이소 and 장두성},
booktitle = {한국정보과학회 학술발표논문집 (KCC 2026)},
year = {2026}
}
```
---
## License
- **Benchmark tasks, evaluation code, and results:** [CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
- **Spatial datasets:** 공공누리 1유형 (출처 표시 조건, 각 데이터 출처 참조)
- **QGIS MCP tool:** Not included. See [jjsantos01/qgis_mcp](https://github.com/jjsantos01/qgis_mcp)
|