Datasets:
Download README.md from yiseo0/GIS-Bench: direct link, hf CLI and curl.
- Browser
- Download file 6.72 kB
-
https://huggingface.co/datasets/yiseo0/GIS-Bench/resolve/main/README.md
- Command line
-
hf download hf://datasets/yiseo0/GIS-Bench/README.md
-
curl -L -o README.md https://huggingface.co/datasets/yiseo0/GIS-Bench/resolve/main/README.md
license: cc-by-4.0
task_categories:
- other
language:
- ko
- en
tags:
- GIS
- benchmark
- geospatial
- LLM
- agent
- QGIS
- MCP
- spatial-analysis
pretty_name: GIS-Bench
size_categories:
- n<100
GIS-Bench: A Benchmark for Evaluating LLM-based GIS Automation Agents
Dataset Description
GIS-Bench is a benchmark framework designed to evaluate the capability of Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents in automating GIS (Geographic Information System) tasks using the Model Context Protocol (MCP).
This benchmark was developed as part of a master's thesis research and targets real-world spatial analysis workflows executable in QGIS Desktop via Claude + MCP integration.
- Paper: GIS-Bench: LLM 기반 GIS 자동화 에이전트 평가 벤치마크 (KCC 2026, submitted)
- Repository: yiseo0/GIS-Bench
- License: CC BY 4.0
Benchmark Overview
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Total Tasks | 50 |
| Difficulty Levels | 3 (Level 1 / Level 2 / Level 3) |
| Task Type | GIS spatial analysis & visualization |
| Output Format | HTML (Leaflet.js map), PNG, JPG |
| Evaluation Method | VLM-based automated scoring (Claude Sonnet) |
| Scoring | 130-point raw → 100-point normalized |
| Pass Threshold | 60 points (normalized) |
Evaluated Models
| Model | Condition | Pass Rate (Overall) |
|---|---|---|
| GPT-5.4-mini | Few-shot | 10.0% |
| GPT-5.2 | Few-shot | 36.0% |
| Claude (Sonnet) | Zero-shot | 60.0% |
| Claude (Sonnet) | Few-shot | 78.0% |
| Claude (Sonnet) + QGIS MCP | Agentic | 86.0% |
Statistical significance confirmed via McNemar's test (p < 0.05)
Task Structure
Tasks are organized across 3 difficulty levels:
| Level | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Level 1 | Basic data loading & visualization | Load a shapefile and display on map |
| Level 2 | Spatial filtering & styling | Filter buildings by area > 500㎡ with color coding |
| Level 3 | Multi-step spatial analysis (MCP-driven, server data access) | Load Landsat NDWI data via MCP and generate a landslide density heatmap using native:heatmapkerneldensity |
Each task entry includes:
task_no: Task ID (1–45)prompt: Natural language instruction (Korean)level: Difficulty level (1, 2, or 3)
Data Sources
All spatial datasets used in this benchmark are sourced from Korean public data portals under open licenses.
| 데이터명 | 실제 파일 | 형식 | 공간 유형 | 좌표계 | 출처 | 라이선스 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 서울시 CCTV 설치 현황 | few_shot_test_서울시 안심이 CCTV 연계 현황 |
CSV | Point | EPSG:4326 (WGS84) | 서울 열린데이터광장 | 공공누리 1유형 |
| 서울시 고도지구 경계 | UQ123_용도지구(고도지구)_20250805 |
SHP | Polygon | EPSG:5186 | 국토정보플랫폼 | 공공누리 1유형 |
| 서울시 행정경계 | 서울시_SIG.shp |
SHP | Polygon | EPSG:5186 | 공공데이터포털 | 공공누리 1유형 |
| 수치표고모델 (DEM) | (B080)공개DEM_34602_img_2025 |
GeoTIFF | Raster | EPSG:5186 | 국토정보플랫폼 | 공공누리 1유형 |
| 고해상도 위성영상 | Landsat_위성영상의_정규물지수_2024 |
GeoTIFF | Raster | EPSG:5186 | NASA EarthData | Public Domain |
All datasets are publicly available and free to use with attribution.
Evaluation Pipeline
Evaluation is performed using VLM-based automated scoring with Claude Sonnet as the judge model.
Scoring Criteria (130-point raw scale)
Basic Quality (100 pts)
| Criterion | Max Score | Description |
|---|---|---|
exists |
20 | Meaningful visualization present |
accuracy |
30 | Correct region and dataset used |
requirement |
30 | Color, filter, buffer conditions met |
completeness |
20 | Legend, title, labels complete |
Spatial Accuracy (30 pts)
| Criterion | Max Score | Description |
|---|---|---|
spatial_location |
15 | Data displayed in correct geographic area |
geometry_validity |
5 | No polygon/buffer distortion |
numeric_match |
10 | Numeric conditions reflected in output |
Normalization: score_normalized = round(total_raw / 130 * 100)
Each task is evaluated 3 times (N=3) and the average score is used for robustness.
See evaluation/eval_criteria.md for the full evaluation prompt and criteria details.
Reference Outputs
Since GIS tasks do not always have a single deterministic "ground truth," this benchmark provides reference outputs — screenshots generated by the benchmark author under each task condition. These serve as visual references for what a correct result should look like.
Reference screenshots are provided in assets/screenshots/ organized by model and task ID.
MCP Tool Dependency
This benchmark was conducted using QGIS MCP to connect Claude to QGIS Desktop.
- Tool: jjsantos01/qgis_mcp
- Description: MCP server + QGIS plugin that allows LLMs to control QGIS Desktop
- Note: The MCP tool code is not included in this repository. Please refer to the original repository for installation.
Repository Structure
GIS-Bench/
├── README.md # This file (Dataset Card)
├── data/
│ └── tasks.json # 50 task prompts with level labels
├── evaluation/
│ ├── run_evaluation_vlm.py # VLM evaluation pipeline (5 models)
│ └── eval_criteria.md # Scoring criteria & judge prompt
└── assets/
└── screenshots/ # Reference output screenshots
Citation
If you use GIS-Bench in your research, please cite:
@inproceedings{gisbench2026,
title = {GIS-Bench: LLM 기반 GIS 자동화 에이전트 평가 벤치마크},
author = {김이소 and 장두성},
booktitle = {한국정보과학회 학술발표논문집 (KCC 2026)},
year = {2026}
}
License
- Benchmark tasks, evaluation code, and results: CC BY 4.0
- Spatial datasets: 공공누리 1유형 (출처 표시 조건, 각 데이터 출처 참조)
- QGIS MCP tool: Not included. See jjsantos01/qgis_mcp