Update README.md

README.md

@@ -101,24 +101,6 @@ Both directions are enforced by a test suite, not by good intentions:
 *and* that **real defects still cost**. Any change to the reference policy that
 breaks either direction fails CI.
 
-### Does it actually work?
-
-The `vietnamese` subset is the control: no digits, acronyms or English, so there
-is nothing for the reference expansion to do. Measured across four systems, the
-three reference policies are **identical to four decimal places** on that
-subset — while `challenging` moves a lot. The expansion is targeted, not a
-blanket loosening.
-
-| Reference policy | `vietnamese` | `challenging` |
-|---|---|---|
-| `strict` — written text only | 0.16% | 11.75% |
-| `norm` — + curated spoken form | 0.16% | 5.62% |
-| `robust` — + all acceptable readings | **0.16%** | **1.75%** |
-
-<sub>ZeroTTS, same wavs throughout. All three policies are reported by the
-scorer on every run, so you can always see how much of a number is scoring
-policy.</sub>
-
 ---
 
 ## Scoring your model in 3 commands