File size: 7,013 Bytes
56a6f4e
 
075c603
 
 
56a6f4e
075c603
 
 
 
56a6f4e
075c603
58db1ea
 
 
 
 
075c603
 
 
 
56a6f4e
075c603
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
58db1ea
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
075c603
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
58db1ea
075c603
58db1ea
 
075c603
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
58db1ea
075c603
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
58db1ea
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
075c603
 
 
 
 
58db1ea
 
 
 
 
075c603
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
---
license: apache-2.0
language:
- en
library_name: mlx
tags:
- theorem-proving
- lean4
- conjecture-generation
- apple-silicon
- mlx
- ravenx
- conjecturebench
- prediction-markets
- trading
- polymarket
- formal-verification
base_model: Qwen/Qwen3-8B
datasets:
- AI-MO/NuminaMath-LEAN
pipeline_tag: text-generation
---

# RavenX-Conjecture-Qwen3-8B-MLX

**The first conjecture generation model fine-tuned on MLX for Apple Silicon.**

Built by a security AI company that doesn't do math. That's the point.

## The Story

On July 22, 2026 β€” first day back after two weeks sick β€” RavenX AI Labs:

1. Read the ConjectureBench paper (arXiv:2510.11986) β€” nobody had implemented it locally
2. Built the first MLX-native LEAN-FIRE pipeline on Apple Silicon
3. Fine-tuned the first conjecture generation model that exists
4. Verified Dmitry Rybin's breaking counterexample to the 30-year-old Dinitz-Garg-Goemans conjecture within hours

We don't do math. We do security AI and sovereign infrastructure. We built this cold.

---

## πŸ”₯ Universal Conjecture Engine β€” 3 Modes, 5 Domains

The core insight: **conjecture generation IS prediction.** Same pipeline whether you're breaking a 30-year-old math conjecture or sizing a Polymarket position.

| Mode | What It Does |
|------|-------------|
| **VALIDATE** | Prove a conjecture true β€” decompose, formalize, verify |
| **BREAK** | Find a counterexample β€” attack surfaces, exhaustive search |
| **PREDICT** | Generate predictions β€” trading, Polymarket, security, science |

### Mode 1: VALIDATE β€” Prove It True

```python
from mlx_lm import load, generate

model, tokenizer = load("deadbydawn101/RavenX-Conjecture-Qwen3-8B-MLX")

messages = [
    {"role": "system", "content": """You are a formal verification expert. Your task is to PROVE a conjecture is true.
Process: 1) DECOMPOSE into atomic claims 2) FORMALIZE in Lean 4 3) EVIDENCE for each claim 4) SYNTHESIZE proof 5) CONFIDENCE rating (0-1).
Output: decomposition, formal statement, proof sketch, verdict (PROVED / LIKELY TRUE / INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE), weakest link."""},
    {"role": "user", "content": "Every even integer greater than 2 is the sum of two primes (Goldbach's conjecture)\n/no_think"}
]

prompt = tokenizer.apply_chat_template(messages, tokenize=False, add_generation_prompt=True)
output = generate(model, tokenizer, prompt=prompt, max_tokens=1024)
print(output)
```

### Mode 2: BREAK β€” Find a Counterexample

This is how we verified the DGG counterexample. The system prompt that breaks conjectures:

```python
messages = [
    {"role": "system", "content": """You are a counterexample hunter. Your task is to DISPROVE a conjecture.
Process: 1) FORMALIZE the claim precisely 2) BOUNDARIES β€” constraints and degrees of freedom 3) ATTACK SURFACE β€” where is it weakest? 4) CONSTRUCT a candidate 5) VERIFY exhaustively (integer arithmetic) 6) CERTIFY with explicit values.
Key: exhaustive verification, integer arithmetic, show all work. Beautiful constructions are often correct."""},
    {"role": "user", "content": """For single-source unsplittable flow, every fractional flow can be rounded to unsplittable flow of no higher cost, with each arc's load exceeded by at most d_max.

Try: small planar graphs, 3 terminals, unequal demands, razor-thin margins.
/no_think"""}
]
```

### Mode 3: PREDICT β€” Trading, Polymarket, Security

**The killer app.** Conjecture = Prediction. Formalization = Resolution criteria. Counterexample = The trade.

```python
# Polymarket prediction
messages = [
    {"role": "system", "content": """You are a prediction engine. A prediction IS a conjecture. Resolution criteria IS verification.
Process: 1) FORMALIZE the claim (precise, time-bounded, resolution source) 2) DECOMPOSE into sub-claims with individual probabilities 3) BASE RATE + evidence update 4) COMBINED estimate with confidence interval 5) IDENTIFY THE EDGE (your estimate vs market price).
Use Kelly criterion for position sizing. State max downside."""},
    {"role": "user", "content": """**Claim:** BTC will close above $100,000 by September 30, 2026
**Current Market Price:** 0.35
**Implied Probability:** 35.0%
**Context:** Current price ~$68K. ETF inflows $200M/day. Halving April 2024. Fed cutting rates Q3 2026.
/no_think"""}
]

# Security conjecture
messages = [
    {"role": "system", "content": """You are a security verification engine. Formalize vulnerabilities as formal claims, then prove or disprove.
Process: 1) FORMALIZE the vulnerability as a claim about system state 2) ATTACK MODEL β€” attacker capabilities 3) Check CVE/NVD/MITRE 4) Construct minimal PoC 5) Prove or disprove the claim 6) Responsible disclosure if confirmed."""},
    {"role": "user", "content": """The Sovereignty Chain's gradient ledger encryption prevents extraction of fine-tuning data without the owner's private key.
Context: PGP-based encryption of gradient deltas. Attacker has full model weights but not the PGP key.
/no_think"""}
]
```

---

## Training

| Parameter | Value |
|-----------|-------|
| Base model | Qwen/Qwen3-8B |
| Method | MLX LoRA (rank 16, alpha 32) |
| Dataset | AI-MO/NuminaMath-LEAN (1,706 train / 190 valid) |
| Iterations | 1,500 |
| Val loss | 2.993 β†’ 0.651 (78% reduction) |
| Time | ~75 min on Apple M4 Max 128GB |
| Tokens trained | 1,010,330 |

## Results

**Before:** model consumed all tokens in think blocks, no Lean 4 output.
**After:** correct Lean structures β€” existential statements, IsGreatest, Finset.range, Real.pi.

## DGG Conjecture β€” Verify Yourself

```bash
git clone https://github.com/DeadByDawn101/ravenx-conjecturebench
python formal_verification/verify_dgg.py
```

All 8 routings. Integer arithmetic. 60 > 58. 245-line Lean 4 formalization included.

## Formats

| Format | Size | Link |
|--------|------|------|
| **MLX (this repo)** | 4.3 GB | You're here |
| GGUF Q8_0 | 8.1 GB | [GGUF](https://huggingface.co/deadbydawn101/RavenX-Conjecture-Qwen3-8B-GGUF) |

## Full Pipeline + Universal Prompt Engine

[github.com/DeadByDawn101/ravenx-conjecturebench](https://github.com/DeadByDawn101/ravenx-conjecturebench)

Includes `prompts/universal_conjecture.py` β€” run predictions from the command line:
```bash
python prompts/universal_conjecture.py --mode predict --domain trading --claim "BTC > 100K by Sept" --market-price 0.35 --run
python prompts/universal_conjecture.py --mode break --claim "Your conjecture here" --run
python prompts/universal_conjecture.py --example dgg_break --run
```

## RavenX AI Labs

155K+ HF downloads | 22 models | 2 USPTO patents | Security AI

- [CyberAgent-35B](https://huggingface.co/deadbydawn101/RavenX-CyberAgent-Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-Opus-4.7-OpenMythos-Pentester-BugHunter-RATH-GGUF) β€” 20K+ downloads
- [Gemma-4-E4B](https://huggingface.co/deadbydawn101/gemma-4-E4B-Agentic-Opus-Reasoning-GeminiCLI-mlx-4bit) β€” 103K+ downloads

[@DeadByDawn101](https://github.com/DeadByDawn101) | [@RavenXllm](https://x.com/RavenXllm)

*"We don't do math. That's the point." β€” RavenX AI Labs*