Update README.md

README.md

@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ The default text adapter was fitted to public JevBench decision examples, starti
 
 JEVision currently has functional checks for typed responses, image routing, and long request acceptance, plus the recorded real-photo example above. The public JevBench examples were used to fit and select the text adapter, so accuracy on those examples is not an independent benchmark result. A separate 33-question grouped text test recorded 21 correct (63.6%) with a 4,096-token cap. This small test does not measure the visual route or long-context answer quality. The 80,000-token value is a service limit, and requests beyond it are rejected instead of silently truncated. The comparisons below describe these specific text panels; they are not a broad accuracy, latency, or cost claim.
 
-![Text JevBench comparison of JEVision, Jev, and KEV on the public training panel and grouped test](assets/JevBench Results.png)
+![Text JevBench comparison of JEVision, Jev, and KEV on the public training panel and grouped test](assets/JevBench-results.png)
 
 The public-panel result for JEVision is 231/231 (100%), **in-sample** because those labels were used during training and selection. The grouped test is the separate 33-question check. Neither panel evaluates the visual route.