Jebadiah 9B v2

Code · Sizes: 27B · 9B v2 · 4B v2 · Previous: 9B v1

Jebadiah (Jeb for short) is Frontier Infra's open System One style decision model. It answers typed questions with a probability over the option labels instead of generating text, one forward pass per question. Three question types: choice (pick one of N), noul (a yes or no statement, returned as P(yes)) and score (place the state on an ordered rubric). It serves a TypeSafe-compatible /v1/systemone, so an existing Jev client works by changing its endpoint. It is a standard transformers model: run it anywhere. Trained on public data only.

They call me Jeb. He does not talk much. He just decides.

This repository holds full bf16 weights: the v2 LoRA merged into Qwen/Qwen3.5-9B (revision c2022362, the chat checkpoint, thinking off). What changed from v1 is one thing, the base: v1 was trained on Qwen/Qwen3.5-9B-Base. The data, LoRA, objective and temperature fit are v1's.

Made in Texas.

Results

Measured by us with AINode's bench, one logit read per question, the same rendered prompt for every model. Accuracy is the share of questions whose top label is the human label. Headline is the macro over the zero-shot public sets. These are our numbers on the public suites, not rows on the Jevals board.

Accuracy 27B 9B v2 4B v2 9B v1
Headline 78.9 73.9 72.5 73.3
Jevals PubMedQA (noul, 300) 90.0 90.3 88.7 89.7
Jevals Banking77 (choice, 77 options, 300) 77.0 70.7 70.0 70.0
Jevals HelpSteer2 helpfulness (score, 300) 48.7 40.7 40.0 40.3
Nimble held-out eval (mixed, 324) 93.5 81.2 77.2 78.7
Kev transfer-v4 test (mixed, 764) 85.9 83.8 83.2 84.0
Nimble public, 13 subsets (macro, 3,880) 78.6 77.0 75.9 77.0

The 27B is the same recipe on Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B; see its card. For scale, Bespoke's published table puts Nimble-9B at 74.8 and Jev at 76.0 on the same 13 Nimble public subsets, with their scorer.

Where v2 is not better than v1: the Jevals HelpSteer2 Decision Score is 10.4 against 11.9, and its top level flips over identical repeats on 2.3% of questions against 0.3%. The Nimble public macro is flat (77.0): MultiNLI and PAWS give back what PubMedQA and HelpSteer2 gain. ECE on the Nimble 324 set rises from 0.063 to 0.085. The headline gain is 0.6 points, most of it from the Nimble 324 set. HelpSteer2 and SummEval are not zero-shot for Jeb: the pool trains on their train split and unscored articles (no evaluation item overlaps), so those rows are held-out items of a seen rubric.

Every calibrated number applies the per-type temperatures in temperatures.json. Decision Scores, ECE, repeat flips, the in-distribution sets, every Nimble subset and the merge check are in eval/RESULTS.md; the per-question records are beside it in eval/. The nonce robustness pass is pending for this model, so no robustness number is claimed.

Run it anywhere

Standalone server. server/ in the Jebadiah repository serves one model on one CUDA GPU or an Apple Silicon Mac: POST /v1/systemone (Jev's wire format), AINode's POST /v1/decide, and a browser playground. Python 3.12 and uv. The 9B needs about 19 GB for its bf16 weights plus runtime overhead.

git clone https://github.com/getainode/jebadiah.git
cd jebadiah/server
uv sync                      # add --extra cuda on a CUDA box for the fast linear-attention kernels
uv run hf download frontier-infra/jebadiah-9b-v2
uv run jebadiah-serve --model frontier-infra/jebadiah-9b-v2

Open http://localhost:8000 for the playground, or /docs for the API. --host 0.0.0.0 serves other machines; JEBADIAH_API_KEY requires a bearer key. It is the server's default model, so uv run jebadiah-serve alone serves it.

curl -s localhost:8000/v1/systemone -H 'content-type: application/json' -d '{
  "state": {"ticket": "Customer says the invoice total does not match the quote."},
  "questions": {
    "route":  {"type": "choice", "instructions": "Which team should take this ticket?",
               "criteria": {"billing": "an invoice, a charge or a refund",
                            "support": "a product question", "sales": "a quote or a renewal"}},
    "urgent": {"type": "noul", "instructions": "The customer is blocked from working.",
               "criteria": {"true": "work has stopped", "false": "it can wait"}}}}'

A choice comes back as choice, confidence and probabilities per key; a noul as noul = P(true); a score as score, legend and probabilities. The response carries a calibration block with the temperatures applied.

transformers only. scripts/ in this repository is the renderer and logit read the model was trained with, and decide_standalone.py runs one request end to end:

pip install torch transformers==5.17.0 huggingface_hub
hf download frontier-infra/jebadiah-9b-v2 --local-dir jeb
python jeb/scripts/decide_standalone.py --model jeb --request jeb/scripts/example-request.json   # --no-temperatures for the raw distribution

Runs on CPU too (slow without the DeltaNet kernels), and --device mps on Apple silicon, which is how it was checked before publishing.

Run it on AINode

The AINode model id is the Hugging Face repo id. Load it on a node (--language-model-only keeps vLLM from profiling the unused vision tower):

curl -sS https://<your-ainode>/api/models/load -H "Authorization: Bearer <key>" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"model": "frontier-infra/jebadiah-9b-v2", "gpu_memory_utilization": 0.30, "max_model_len": 4096, "kv_cache_dtype": "auto", "extra_vllm_args": ["--language-model-only", "--enforce-eager"]}'

Then send the same body to https://<your-ainode>/v1/systemone with "model": "frontier-infra/jebadiah-9b-v2" added, or ask AINode's own shape at /v1/decide. From AINode 0.5.32 (merged, not yet released) both routes apply temperatures.json; a node on 0.5.31 returns raw probabilities, and the first request of each question type there compiles its grammar for a minute or more, so warm each type with a one-question request first.

Other formats

  • GGUF for llama.cpp: jebadiah-9b-v2-GGUF. Same answer as these weights on 257 of 260 held-out questions (Q8_0) and 240 of 260 (Q4_K_M).
  • MLX for Apple silicon: jebadiah-9b-v2-MLX. Same answer on 256 of 260 (8-bit; the 4-bit build fell under 90% and was not published).

How it decides

The prompt is AINode's own decide rendering (source commit e5c08938, hash in prompt_contract.json), through the chat template with thinking off. The option labels are single tokens; the answer is the distribution over those label tokens at the last prompt position, read in fp32 and temperature scaled per type (temperatures.json: choice 1.19, noul 1.09, score 1.22). Nothing is generated. Those are the train fit, which minimises NLL against the soft or ordinal target the model was taught; it softens, and it costs some ECE against hard labels on the calibration split. A sharper hard fit (0.79 / 0.67 / 0.83) is in the same file for a consumer who gates on the argmax. Thresholds belong to the caller: act on a high probability, confirm or escalate on a middle one, hand a low one to a person or a bigger model. The model never refuses.

Training

  • Base: Qwen/Qwen3.5-9B at c2022362, the chat checkpoint, thinking off (v1: Qwen/Qwen3.5-9B-Base).
  • Objective: cross-entropy over the option-label logits at the answer position; score questions use an ordinal target around the human label.
  • Adapter: LoRA r=16, alpha=32 on every linear projection (43.3M trainable), learning rate 1e-4, one epoch, 1,862 steps, seed 17. Merged into the bf16 weights: 248 of 248 pairs, and the merged weights give the run's pick on 257 of 260 re-scored questions.
  • Data, public only: 11,013 records and 15,813 questions from LocalLLaMA/typed-decisions, the Kev v7 sources whose licenses permit derived weights, the nvidia/HelpSteer2 train split and SummEval (Nimble's 15 evaluation articles excluded). A 95/5 split into training and calibration. Nimble's train set and the Jevals test items are excluded.
  • Compute: one NVIDIA A100 80GB PCIe, 90 minutes of training.

Limitations

  • Single-hop judgments only. Split a chain of inference into hops.
  • A choice question is capped at 20 options on /v1/systemone; Banking77's 77 options were scored with an extended single-token alphabet for the benchmark only.
  • English data. Training cut states past 2,048 prompt tokens.
  • Calibration was fitted on the training distribution. Refit before trusting a threshold.

Versioning and license

v2 is frozen; later versions land as new jebadiah-* repositories, and v1 stays as it is. Weights Apache-2.0, base model Qwen/Qwen3.5-9B Apache-2.0. Evaluation data: Jevals suite 0.1.0 (CC-BY-4.0, "Jevals (jevals.com), release 2026-09-18"), Nimble public subsets (Bespoke Labs), Kev test sets and typed-decisions test, each under its own license. Not affiliated with TypeSafe AI or Jev.

Downloads last month
16
Safetensors
Model size
10B params
Tensor type
BF16
·
F32
·
Inference Providers NEW
This model isn't deployed by any Inference Provider. 🙋 Ask for provider support

Model tree for frontier-infra/jebadiah-9b-v2

Finetuned
Qwen/Qwen3.5-9B
Finetuned
(938)
this model
Quantizations
2 models

Datasets used to train frontier-infra/jebadiah-9b-v2

Evaluation results

  • accuracy on Jevals suite 0.1.0, PubMedQA (noul)
    self-reported
    90.300
  • decision_score_jevals on Jevals suite 0.1.0, PubMedQA (noul)
    self-reported
    68.600
  • accuracy on Jevals suite 0.1.0, Banking77 (choice, 77-way)
    self-reported
    70.700
  • decision_score_jevals on Jevals suite 0.1.0, Banking77 (choice, 77-way)
    self-reported
    58.200
  • decision_score_jevals on Jevals suite 0.1.0, HelpSteer2 helpfulness (score)
    self-reported
    10.400
  • accuracy on Nimble public human-labelled subsets (13, macro accuracy)
    self-reported
    77.000