终于等到heretic版了,测试了一下. llama.cpp perplexity

#1
by xht033 - opened
   # Perplexity Benchmark — wikitext-2 (wiki.test.raw)

   ## Setup

   - Dataset: wikitext-2 raw test set (wiki.test.raw)
   - Chunks: 4 x 2048 = 8192 tokens
   - Flags: -ngl 999 -b 512 --chunks 4 -fa on
   - Quantization: Q4_K_M for all models
   - Tool: llama-perplexity from llama.cpp

   ## Models

   | # | Model | Source |
   |---|-------|--------|
   | 1 | Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-uncensored-heretic (Native-MTP) | llmfan46 |
   | 2 | Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-uncensored-heretic (base) | llmfan46 |
   | 3 | Ornith-1.0-35B-Q4_K_M | bartowski |
   | 4 | Ornith-1.0-35B-uncensored-heretic-Q4_K_M | llmfan46 |

   ## Results (lower = better)

   | Rank | Model | Perplexity | Size |
   |------|-------|-----------|------|
   | 1 | Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-uncensored-heretic (Native-MTP) | 6.2599 | 20G |
   | 2 | Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-uncensored-heretic (base) | 6.2834 | 20G |
   | 3 | Ornith-1.0-35B (bartowski) | 6.3405 | 20G |
   | 4 | Ornith-1.0-35B-uncensored-heretic (llmfan46) | 6.5624 | 20G |

   ## Observations

   - Qwen3.6-35B-A3B MTP leads with 6.26 PPL, marginally ahead of the non-MTP version (6.28).
   - Both Ornith-1.0-35B variants sit behind Qwen3.6-35B-A3B by ~0.08-0.30 PPL points.
   - The bartowski Ornith (6.34) beats the llmfan46 heretic Ornith (6.56) by ~0.22 PPL.

   Question: is this gap meaningful given wikitext-2 is a narrow benchmark?

Well then better to use the Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-uncensored-heretic (Native-MTP) version then since it scores the best?

Also bartowski scores better but it is the censored version , even on my benchmark you can see that I tested the original censored version and my uncensored version, here are the test scores:

MMLU test results:

Original:

============================================================

Total questions: 7021

Correct: 5802

Accuracy: 0.8264 (82.64%)

Parse failures: 0

============================================================

Heretic:

============================================================

Total questions: 7021

Correct: 5737

Accuracy: 0.8171 (81.71%)

Parse failures: 0

============================================================

You can see that there is an accuracy loss of 0.93%.

Sign up or log in to comment