mattjoyce commited on
Commit
4d15386
Β·
verified Β·
1 Parent(s): c7fd470

card: charts embedded, phrasing scrubbed

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +13 -9
README.md CHANGED
@@ -24,12 +24,14 @@ Nine quantizations of [fdtn-ai/antares-1b](https://huggingface.co/fdtn-ai/antare
24
  through a terminal and submits a ranked list of suspect files; a fine-tune of
25
  [ibm-granite/granite-4.0-1b](https://huggingface.co/ibm-granite/granite-4.0-1b)).
26
 
27
- What's different about this repo: **every file was benchmarked before publishing** on
28
- the model's own vulnerability-localization benchmark β€” the full 499-task set,
29
- detection (Phase A) *and* clean-tree false-alarm rate (Phase B), with three-run error
30
- bars at the decision boundaries β€” and every file's sha256 is published. As of
31
- 2026-08-02, none of the dozen-plus community GGUF repos of this model we surveyed
32
- publish per-file hashes or measurements, and we found no imatrix builds among them.
 
 
33
 
34
  ## Which file do I want?
35
 
@@ -58,7 +60,7 @@ rate on clean trees. Rungs 0–6 measured 2026-07-30/31; rungs 7–8 measured 20
58
  | 5 | Q3_K_M | β€” | 0.95 GB | 26% | 0.0402 | 51.3% | 0.539* |
59
  | 6 | Q2_K | β€” | 0.77 GB | 21% | 0.0000 | 100% | 1.000* |
60
 
61
- **Reading this table honestly:**
62
 
63
  - Β± values are 1 sd over three full benchmark runs. Cells without Β± are single runs;
64
  observed single-run spread at a fixed rung is roughly Β±0.003–0.006, so **rungs are
@@ -69,6 +71,8 @@ rate on clean trees. Rungs 0–6 measured 2026-07-30/31; rungs 7–8 measured 20
69
  - **IQ4_XS**: three runs scored 0.1742 / 0.1588 / 0.1613 on identical config. With
70
  n=3 the wide spread is suggestive, not proven β€” but treat any single-run IQ4_XS
71
  benchmark (ours or anyone's) as uninformative.
 
 
72
  - **None of these rungs is a stand-alone merge gate.** Healthy rungs flag something
73
  on 96–99% of *clean* trees (Phase B). Treat output as leads for a human or a
74
  stronger model β€” which matches the upstream guidance ("a lead to verify, not
@@ -104,7 +108,7 @@ Measurement configuration (what these numbers were produced with):
104
  Traps:
105
 
106
  1. **Ollama's `/v1/completions` is not raw.** It wraps prompts in the GGUF's chat
107
- template with no error and quietly degraded results. If you must use Ollama, set an
108
  identity template (`TEMPLATE {{ .Prompt }}`) and verify with a token-count sentinel
109
  (tokenize your prompt separately; compare `prompt_tokens`).
110
  2. **Double-BOS.** The tokenizer adds BOS; if your client also prepends one, quality
@@ -177,4 +181,4 @@ Apache-2.0, inherited from [fdtn-ai/antares-1b](https://huggingface.co/fdtn-ai/a
177
  is gated β€” if you want the original safetensors, the CLI tooling, or the benchmark,
178
  go through their gate; this repo exists to publish *measured* quantizations, not to
179
  route around upstream. If you are the upstream team and want anything here changed,
180
- open a discussion β€” happy to adjust.
 
24
  through a terminal and submits a ranked list of suspect files; a fine-tune of
25
  [ibm-granite/granite-4.0-1b](https://huggingface.co/ibm-granite/granite-4.0-1b)).
26
 
27
+ **Every file here was benchmarked before publishing** on the model's own
28
+ vulnerability-localization benchmark β€” the full 499-task set, detection (Phase A)
29
+ *and* clean-tree false-alarm rate (Phase B), with three-run error bars at the
30
+ decision boundaries β€” and every file's sha256 is published. As of 2026-08-02, none
31
+ of the dozen-plus community GGUF repos of this model we surveyed publish per-file
32
+ hashes or measurements, and we found no imatrix builds among them.
33
+
34
+ ![Quant ladder: File F1 vs file size](ladder.svg)
35
 
36
  ## Which file do I want?
37
 
 
60
  | 5 | Q3_K_M | β€” | 0.95 GB | 26% | 0.0402 | 51.3% | 0.539* |
61
  | 6 | Q2_K | β€” | 0.77 GB | 21% | 0.0000 | 100% | 1.000* |
62
 
63
+ **Table notes:**
64
 
65
  - Β± values are 1 sd over three full benchmark runs. Cells without Β± are single runs;
66
  observed single-run spread at a fixed rung is roughly Β±0.003–0.006, so **rungs are
 
71
  - **IQ4_XS**: three runs scored 0.1742 / 0.1588 / 0.1613 on identical config. With
72
  n=3 the wide spread is suggestive, not proven β€” but treat any single-run IQ4_XS
73
  benchmark (ours or anyone's) as uninformative.
74
+
75
+ ![Run-to-run spread by rung](stability.svg)
76
  - **None of these rungs is a stand-alone merge gate.** Healthy rungs flag something
77
  on 96–99% of *clean* trees (Phase B). Treat output as leads for a human or a
78
  stronger model β€” which matches the upstream guidance ("a lead to verify, not
 
108
  Traps:
109
 
110
  1. **Ollama's `/v1/completions` is not raw.** It wraps prompts in the GGUF's chat
111
+ template β€” no error, degraded results. If you must use Ollama, set an
112
  identity template (`TEMPLATE {{ .Prompt }}`) and verify with a token-count sentinel
113
  (tokenize your prompt separately; compare `prompt_tokens`).
114
  2. **Double-BOS.** The tokenizer adds BOS; if your client also prepends one, quality
 
181
  is gated β€” if you want the original safetensors, the CLI tooling, or the benchmark,
182
  go through their gate; this repo exists to publish *measured* quantizations, not to
183
  route around upstream. If you are the upstream team and want anything here changed,
184
+ open a discussion.