Preference-Guided Adaptation for Open-Vocabulary Semantic Segmentation via Prompt Disagreement
Abstract
Open-vocabulary semantic segmentation (OVSS) enables pixel-level prediction over arbitrary text-specified vocabularies and has shown strong generalization on common benchmarks. However, OVSS performance often degrades in specialized domains such as medical imaging, remote sensing, and industrial inspection, where dense pixel-level masks for adaptation are costly to obtain and require domain-specific expertise. We propose a preference-guided adaptation framework that replaces dense mask supervision with binary preferences. We observe that different prompt templates produce systematically different segmentations for the same image, a phenomenon we call prompt disagreement, and we repurpose it as a built-in source of preference supervision. Building on this, we mine localized preference queries from regions of high cross-template uncertainty, and adapt the OVSS model with Region-Localized Preference Optimization (RLPO) together with consistency regularization that stabilizes updates outside the queried region. Across extensive experiments on the MESS benchmark, the proposed method achieves consistent gains across diverse OVSS backbones without any pixel-level annotation, and remains effective under noisy preferences. Our code is available at https://github.com/blue-531/pref-ovss.
Community
Open-vocabulary semantic segmentation (OVSS) enables pixel-level prediction over arbitrary text-specified vocabularies and has shown strong generalization on common benchmarks. However, OVSS performance often degrades in specialized domains such as medical imaging, remote sensing, and industrial inspection, where dense pixel-level masks for adaptation are costly to obtain and require domain-specific expertise. We propose a preference-guided adaptation framework that replaces dense mask supervision with binary preferences. We observe that different prompt templates produce systematically different segmentations for the same image, a phenomenon we call prompt disagreement, and we repurpose it as a built-in source of preference supervision. Building on this, we mine localized preference queries from regions of high cross-template uncertainty, and adapt the OVSS model with Region-Localized Preference Optimization (RLPO) together with consistency regularization that stabilizes updates outside the queried region. Across extensive experiments on the MESS benchmark, the proposed method achieves consistent gains across diverse OVSS backbones without any pixel-level annotation, and remains effective under noisy preferences. Our code is available at this https://github.com/blue-531/pref-ovss
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- Test-Time Prototype Adaptation for Open-Vocabulary Semantic Segmentation (2026)
- Vision-Language-Guided Pseudo-Labels for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation in Semantic Segmentation for Waste Sorting (2026)
- SAM3-LoRA: Parameter-Efficient Adaptation of a Concept-Promptable Foundation Model for Multi-Class Structural Defect Segmentation (2026)
- Towards Continual Test-Time Adaptation of Vision-Language Models in Open-Vocabulary Semantic Segmentation (2026)
- SeCo-SBIR: Semantically Consistent Prompt Learning for Zero-Shot Sketch-Based Image Retrieval (2026)
- Hierarchical Prompt Injector for Domain Generalization Segmentation (2026)
- TC-ADA: One-Shot Active Domain Adaptation for Semantic Segmentation (2026)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2609.34528 Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper
Collections including this paper 0
No Collection including this paper