No description provided.

Please consider adding specklabs/Speck1-140M to the leaderboard. Thanks.

AtAndDev changed pull request status to open

Please consider adding specklabs/Speck1-140M to the leaderboard. Thanks.

HI @AtAndDev , Thanks for your submission! Would it be possible to get a PR with the model results in and your org added? If not I can add it tomorrow

Sure, I will do so :)

AtAndDev changed pull request status to closed
This comment has been hidden (marked as Off-Topic)

Hi @AtAndDev , congrats on the release of Speck1-140M! We've benchmarked and added your model to the Neo Open SLM Leaderboard: https://huggingface.co/spaces/AtomixLabs/Neo-Open-SLM-Leaderboard

Adding this model to your leaderboard clone? He didn't even ask and probrably doesent want it to be on your stolen leaderboad

Hi @AtAndDev , congrats on the release of Speck1-140M! We've benchmarked and added your model to the Neo Open SLM Leaderboard: https://huggingface.co/spaces/AtomixLabs/Neo-Open-SLM-Leaderboard

Adding this model to your leaderboard clone? He didn't even ask and probrably doesent want it to be on your stolen leaderboad

lol

This comment has been hidden (marked as Off-Topic)

uhh lets keep it chill guys
i dont have problems with anything, all i want is transparency :)

Hi @AtAndDev , congrats on the release of Speck1-140M! We've benchmarked and added your model to the Neo Open SLM Leaderboard: https://huggingface.co/spaces/AtomixLabs/Neo-Open-SLM-Leaderboard

Adding this model to your leaderboard clone? He didn't even ask and probrably doesent want it to be on your stolen leaderboad

Imagine getting upset that an independent developer's model is getting extra visibility and benchmark coverage.

Guys, let's keep it friendly. Extra visibility is fine. Though I suggest you to change the leaderboard a little since it looks like a no-effort clone that could mislead people into author's work identity issues and confussion.

This comment has been hidden (marked as Off-Topic)

Sign up or log in to comment