Spaces:
Running
Running
Download .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.yml from SZLHOLDINGS/a11oy: direct link, hf CLI and curl.
- Browser
- Download file 1.63 kB
-
https://huggingface.co/spaces/SZLHOLDINGS/a11oy/resolve/15a31bf5b8fb14e321b727a474b00091c418fec6/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.yml
- Command line
-
hf download hf://spaces/SZLHOLDINGS/a11oy@15a31bf5b8fb14e321b727a474b00091c418fec6/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.yml
-
curl -L -o feature_request.yml https://huggingface.co/spaces/SZLHOLDINGS/a11oy/resolve/15a31bf5b8fb14e321b727a474b00091c418fec6/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.yml
1.63 kB
| name: Feature request | |
| description: Suggest a new capability for A11oy. | |
| title: "[feat] " | |
| labels: ["enhancement", "needs-triage"] | |
| body: | |
| - type: textarea | |
| id: problem | |
| attributes: | |
| label: What problem are you trying to solve? | |
| description: Describe the situation, not the solution. ("When I deploy A11oy into an air-gapped UDS cluster I have to ..." is much better than "Please add an X command".) | |
| validations: { required: true } | |
| - type: textarea | |
| id: proposal | |
| attributes: | |
| label: Proposed solution | |
| description: What you would build, what the API / CLI / config surface looks like, and where it would live. | |
| validations: { required: true } | |
| - type: textarea | |
| id: alternatives | |
| attributes: | |
| label: Alternatives considered | |
| placeholder: "Why is this better than doing X downstream / in user code / in a separate tool?" | |
| - type: dropdown | |
| id: surface | |
| attributes: | |
| label: Surface this would land in | |
| options: | |
| - "UDS / Zarf payload" | |
| - "Doctrine core" | |
| - "Connection layer" | |
| - "Doctrine demo" | |
| - "Tooling / CLI" | |
| - "Documentation" | |
| - "Other" | |
| validations: { required: true } | |
| - type: checkboxes | |
| id: willing | |
| attributes: | |
| label: Are you willing to implement this? | |
| options: | |
| - label: Yes, I plan to open a PR | |
| - label: I could implement with maintainer guidance | |
| - label: I'm just suggesting it | |
| - type: checkboxes | |
| id: confirm | |
| attributes: | |
| options: | |
| - label: I searched existing issues and this is not a duplicate | |
| required: true | |