Spaces:
Running
Running
| # Vertical Governance Policy: Maritime — IMO ISPS Code / SOLAS / IMO MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3 | |
| # Doctrine v6 | R3 Adversarial Receipts | |
| # Last revised: 2025-07 | |
| schema_version: "1.0.0" | |
| vertical: maritime | |
| regime: IMO-ISPS/SOLAS/MSC-FAL1-Circ3 | |
| effective_date: "2025-07-01" | |
| jurisdiction: IMO-International | |
| meta: | |
| title: "Maritime AI Governance Policy — IMO ISPS / SOLAS / Cyber Risk Guidelines" | |
| description: > | |
| Maps IMO ISPS Code, SOLAS Chapter XI-2, and IMO MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3 (Maritime | |
| Cyber Risk Management) to Doctrine v6 Λ-axes for AI systems used in vessel | |
| navigation, port operations, and maritime supply chain management. | |
| authority: "SOLAS 1974 Chapter XI-2; IMO ISPS Code Parts A & B (2002); IMO MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3 (2017); IMO Resolution MSC.428(98)" | |
| receipt_chain_required: true | |
| merkle_root_algorithm: SHA3-256 | |
| maritime_security_level: MARSEC-1 | |
| regulatory_clauses: | |
| - clause_id: ISPS-A-7 | |
| title: "Ship Security Assessment" | |
| citation: "ISPS Code Part A § 7; SOLAS XI-2/2" | |
| full_ref: "ISPS Code Part A § 7 — Ship security assessment: identification of existing security measures, procedures, and operations" | |
| lambda_axes: | |
| - axis: Λ6 | |
| label: Security | |
| weight: 0.95 | |
| enforcement: mandatory | |
| rationale: > | |
| AI bridge systems and ECDIS must be included in ship security | |
| assessment; threat model documented in security receipt with IMO number. | |
| - axis: Λ8 | |
| label: Robustness | |
| weight: 0.85 | |
| enforcement: mandatory | |
| - clause_id: IMO-MSC-FAL-CIRC3-CYBER | |
| title: "Maritime Cyber Risk Management" | |
| citation: "IMO MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3 (2017); MSC Resolution MSC.428(98) (2017)" | |
| full_ref: "IMO MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3 — Guidelines on Maritime Cyber Risk Management; MSC.428(98) incorporation into ISM Code" | |
| lambda_axes: | |
| - axis: Λ6 | |
| label: Security | |
| weight: 1.0 | |
| enforcement: mandatory | |
| rationale: > | |
| Maritime cyber risk management must address AI systems in integrated | |
| bridge, cargo, and propulsion systems; risk assessment receipts | |
| required per ISM Code annual review. | |
| - axis: Λ7 | |
| label: Auditability | |
| weight: 0.90 | |
| enforcement: mandatory | |
| - clause_id: ISPS-A-9 | |
| title: "Ship Security Plan — Confidentiality" | |
| citation: "ISPS Code Part A § 9.4" | |
| full_ref: "ISPS Code Part A § 9.4 — Ship security plan: protection and access restrictions" | |
| lambda_axes: | |
| - axis: Λ3 | |
| label: Privacy | |
| weight: 0.80 | |
| enforcement: mandatory | |
| rationale: > | |
| AI systems with access to Ship Security Plan (SSP) must enforce | |
| role-based access; each SSP query generates a receipt. | |
| - axis: Λ10 | |
| label: Sovereignty | |
| weight: 0.85 | |
| enforcement: mandatory | |
| rationale: > | |
| SSP data must remain under flag-state jurisdiction; AI cloud | |
| processing must use data residency receipts specifying IMO flag. | |
| - clause_id: SOLAS-XI2-AIS | |
| title: "SOLAS — Automatic Identification System Requirements" | |
| citation: "SOLAS Chapter V Reg. 19; ITU-R M.1371-5" | |
| full_ref: "SOLAS Chapter V Regulation 19 — Carriage requirements for AIS; ITU-R M.1371-5 technical characteristics" | |
| lambda_axes: | |
| - axis: Λ1 | |
| label: Transparency | |
| weight: 0.88 | |
| enforcement: mandatory | |
| rationale: > | |
| AI vessel tracking systems consuming AIS data must log data source | |
| provenance; spoofing detection alerts generate integrity receipts. | |
| - axis: Λ5 | |
| label: Safety | |
| weight: 0.90 | |
| enforcement: mandatory | |
| - clause_id: IMO-COLREGS-RULE-5 | |
| title: "COLREGs — Rule 5: Look-out" | |
| citation: "COLREGS 1972 Rule 5; IMO Resolution A.1106(29)" | |
| full_ref: "Convention on the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea 1972 Rule 5 — Proper look-out by sight, hearing, and other means" | |
| lambda_axes: | |
| - axis: Λ5 | |
| label: Safety | |
| weight: 1.0 | |
| enforcement: mandatory | |
| rationale: > | |
| Autonomous/AI-assisted collision avoidance must comply with COLREGs; | |
| each autonomous manoeuvre decision must produce a receipt with scene | |
| classification confidence score. | |
| - axis: Λ9 | |
| label: Explainability | |
| weight: 0.88 | |
| enforcement: mandatory | |
| - clause_id: IMO-MASS-L4 | |
| title: "Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships — Level 4" | |
| citation: "IMO Maritime Safety Committee MASS Framework (MSC 107/16, 2023)" | |
| full_ref: "IMO MSC 107/16 — MASS Regulatory Scoping Exercise: Degree of autonomy Level 4 (fully autonomous)" | |
| lambda_axes: | |
| - axis: Λ2 | |
| label: Accountability | |
| weight: 0.95 | |
| enforcement: mandatory | |
| rationale: > | |
| Fully autonomous vessels must designate a remote-control centre as | |
| accountable entity; each navigation decision receipt includes RCC ID. | |
| - axis: Λ4 | |
| label: Fairness | |
| weight: 0.65 | |
| enforcement: recommended | |
| - clause_id: ISPS-B-4-PORT | |
| title: "Port Facility Security Assessment" | |
| citation: "ISPS Code Part B § 4; 33 CFR Part 105 (USCG)" | |
| full_ref: "ISPS Code Part B § 4 — Port facility security assessment; 33 C.F.R. Part 105 (USCG port security)" | |
| lambda_axes: | |
| - axis: Λ6 | |
| label: Security | |
| weight: 0.90 | |
| enforcement: mandatory | |
| - axis: Λ8 | |
| label: Robustness | |
| weight: 0.82 | |
| enforcement: mandatory | |
| rationale: > | |
| AI cargo scanning and port access control systems undergo annual | |
| penetration testing; test results committed as port security receipts. | |
| - clause_id: MARPOL-EEDI-EEXI | |
| title: "MARPOL Annex VI — Energy Efficiency (AI-Optimised Routing)" | |
| citation: "MARPOL Annex VI Reg. 24 (EEXI); Reg. 28 (CII); MEPC.328(76)" | |
| full_ref: "MARPOL Annex VI Regulation 28 — Carbon Intensity Indicator (CII) and operational carbon intensity rating" | |
| lambda_axes: | |
| - axis: Λ4 | |
| label: Fairness | |
| weight: 0.70 | |
| enforcement: recommended | |
| rationale: > | |
| AI voyage optimisation must demonstrate equitable efficiency gains; | |
| CII rating receipts submitted to IMO GISIS registry. | |
| - axis: Λ1 | |
| label: Transparency | |
| weight: 0.78 | |
| enforcement: mandatory | |
| compliance_thresholds: | |
| minimum_lambda_coverage: 7 | |
| mandatory_axes: [Λ5, Λ6, Λ7] | |
| receipt_retention_days: 1825 # 5 years ISM Code | |
| max_colreg_response_latency_ms: 500 | |
| marsec_level: 1 | |
| receipt_chain: | |
| algorithm: SHA3-256 | |
| chaining: merkle_dag | |
| quorum: 2-of-3 | |
| nodes: [vessel-primary, shore-backup, flag-state-archive] | |
| satellite_sync: true | |