diff --git "a/data/evidence_bundles.csv" "b/data/evidence_bundles.csv"
new file mode 100644--- /dev/null
+++ "b/data/evidence_bundles.csv"
@@ -0,0 +1,1580 @@
+bundle_id,bundle_key,bundle_kind,bundle_kind_label,public_label,title,primary_item_type,primary_item_number,primary_item_title,axis,would_do,maintainer_value,local_test_plan,proof_status,open_issue_numbers,active_pr_numbers,issue_count,pr_count,diagnosis_kind,diagnosis,recommended_next_step,diagnostic_confidence,diagnostic_evidence,local_only,github_action_allowed,blocked_github_actions,bundle_hash
+BUNDLE-001,bundle:bundle-001,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: crash (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,188801,[MPS] Leak MetalShaderLibrary bundled singleton to avoid exit-time destructor crashes,module: crash,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,188812,188801,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #188801 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=6,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a846529043900563a1f6bd41bf9c0123c8f1ada289ecfd21b6705cc7b9041e2c
+BUNDLE-002,bundle:bundle-002,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: correctness (silent) (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,189122,Fix sparse-dense mul dropping data when broadcasting a size-1 sparse dim,module: correctness (silent),"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"158861, 188900",189122,2,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189122 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",795e74f68df038c557e585cd3efb13db755651f6dd3caa0b959d25b62466edc7
+BUNDLE-003,bundle:bundle-003,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: regression (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,185730,Fix dynamic shapes for variadic kwargs,module: regression,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"150022, 150371",185730,2,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185730 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a677d494151485b6cb0bcc0240e4de2249b19e1de4abb000743611909eacbf46
+BUNDLE-004,bundle:bundle-004,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,188948,Fix triangular_solve for sparse CPU tensors on non-MKL platforms,oncall: export,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,153410,188948,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #188948 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5ddbe14adcf83dc3336bf0e5e739e69e02712f899859eda06abef57c661960fc
+BUNDLE-005,bundle:bundle-005,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: crash (3 issues + 2 PRs),pr,189256,[BE][MPS] Factor host-buffer wrapping into buffer_with_offset_from_tensor,module: crash,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"180397, 181374, 188970","181720, 189256",3,2,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189256 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",925dd4aed23bb62be02c51038cf75789bb22d85c81dd72ebaaa4f91cadf70d91
+BUNDLE-006,bundle:bundle-006,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: binaries (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,189043,Preload full bundled cuDNN set with RTLD_GLOBAL to prevent sublibrary version mismatch,module: binaries,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,188892,189043,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #189043 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3dacd2fcc399d1e0d143bbc8c821d1c79c208c3872de985fceff1b93ed1113bf
+BUNDLE-007,bundle:bundle-007,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: advanced indexing (21 issues + 14 PRs),pr,189149,"[inductor] Emit pointwise kernel for small mm (K<8, N<8) instead of cuBLAS",module: advanced indexing,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"178040, 183988, 186348, 187988, 188477, 188675, 188704, 188706, 188707, 188708, 188709, 188710, 188711, 188712, 188713, 188714, 188715, 188716, 188717, 188721, 188891","181726, 181727, 181728, 183511, 184276, 187315, 187318, 187989, 188268, 188931, 188996, 189149, 189186, 189297",21,14,failed_ci_checks,PR #189149 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1357f2b74327fe98a8740b67c9da5a3e33a7a8d74d6c68f5bf937b1d1935f3bc
+BUNDLE-008,bundle:bundle-008,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: aotdispatch (3 issues + 3 PRs),pr,185891,[dynamo] Guard AOTAutograd input mutation overlap changes,module: aotdispatch,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"93617, 178680, 188133","184481, 184694, 185891",3,3,failed_ci_checks,PR #185891 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e73ccc58b5ca1a244df2ba6f798ee008917041a7ef6f53de71abcfdbc736437a
+BUNDLE-009,bundle:bundle-009,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: arm (3 issues + 2 PRs),pr,185946,[CUDA] Warn instead of assert in `reportProcessMemoryInfo` to prevent crash on Tegra OOM,module: arm,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"16706, 185240, 186374","185946, 186375",3,2,failed_ci_checks,PR #185946 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b34a79bd82ead0537ff4efbf93d697c60729751160d4d3f011fe8414f9163cc9
+BUNDLE-010,bundle:bundle-010,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: bfloat16 (2 issues + 3 PRs),pr,186358,Fix output mismtach for F.softshrink with bfloat16 and float scalar,module: bfloat16,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"185470, 185484","185846, 186358, 187609",2,3,failed_ci_checks,PR #186358 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b7cc0469d8f22999be39652efdcbd5845d793cc5e0bcd75f3c9b3b47bf577921
+BUNDLE-011,bundle:bundle-011,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: nans and infs (3 issues + 1 PR),pr,189045,Fix NaN gradients in nn.MultiheadAttention for fully-masked rows (#41…,module: nans and infs,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"40932, 41508, 55056",189045,3,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189045 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ae33edeb54cca9bcaba14d3af6d6d615ec3a1c8f519bce4d2a2f21ffeb6adf0d
+BUNDLE-012,bundle:bundle-012,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: bfloat16 (3 issues + 1 PR),pr,188998,[inductor] Fix bf16 matmul accumulation precision in Triton templates (#188492),module: bfloat16,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"188492, 188841, 189287",188998,3,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #188998 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",66f87d28ffcdd38fbeed49565b079d1f3c0f24283179fee3064ee3e635dc3462
+BUNDLE-013,bundle:bundle-013,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: crash (3 issues + 1 PR),pr,184621,Fix Dynamo torch.Size from tensor shape inputs,module: crash,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"182649, 182651, 182652",184621,3,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #184621 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integra...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",df3b0e8284b5105db567a486b478e0f64ec9962bd58c08814eafc3e2249372a1
+BUNDLE-014,bundle:bundle-014,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: ci (2 issues + 2 PRs),pr,189294,[CI] Realign scipy after nvmath install to fix H100 smoke NumPy ABI crash,module: ci,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"173059, 189034","189294, 189295",2,2,failed_ci_checks,PR #189294 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f6cb09610f7ca814acd523525c8e2d5dbd84a35da282cbc59d2b250ab331a4b4
+BUNDLE-015,bundle:bundle-015,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: correctness (silent) (2 issues + 2 PRs),pr,187354,Match Inductor i0/i1 infinities to eager CUDA,module: correctness (silent),"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"187332, 188545","187354, 188556",2,2,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #187354 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f8e7eae2a7664b944be1981e3d498588d1205627a614fb15552517fe7f6f2745
+BUNDLE-016,bundle:bundle-016,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: correctness (silent) (2 issues + 2 PRs),pr,187908,[fix] torch.where silently overflows fp16 scalars (issue #187429),module: correctness (silent),Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"171356, 187429","185756, 187908",2,2,contributor_update_needed,PR #187908 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2816ea3b823ee390ac0960375ef19d54c432b187aecb443d8bfb0db2795fcc46
+BUNDLE-017,bundle:bundle-017,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: oncall: export (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,185496,Fix export autograd.grad saved tensor tracing,oncall: export,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"146719, 155044",185496,2,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185496 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g). Review signal: My agent says I rebased this onto current main and...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5068ddc46bbceaf596aec11b8cbf5b5603f59ee49832188e110bab2d0a0146f5
+BUNDLE-018,bundle:bundle-018,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: aotdispatch (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,184632,Fix CUDA fake strides for mixed dtype pointwise ops,module: aotdispatch,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"182200, 184101",184632,2,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #184632 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5aa20afd68215ad11e411afad3ea8bd82c3cd9934a81efd95f60d95e7c6133db
+BUNDLE-019,bundle:bundle-019,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: crash (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,184628,Fix SingletonInt static guard evaluation,module: crash,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"182217, 183369",184628,2,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #184628 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",75280f1d082e2598b887886e01998472f2292794a8d936925c594d0784d94845
+BUNDLE-020,bundle:bundle-020,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: correctness (silent) (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,184392,Fix ModularIndexing printer semantics,module: correctness (silent),"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"119883, 187027",184392,2,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #184392 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4a1b30d2f312edc14b410c1b0d6872eb64e0c67170689c5d7cdc0ef9e74b9e8b
+BUNDLE-021,bundle:bundle-021,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: aotdispatch (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,183654,Fix Inductor CPU group norm affine precision,module: aotdispatch,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"181696, 183120",183654,2,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #183654 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",fc77720549d41b5bcc7a30cb271016031f31c6bffdf2deacc6d72c616bbf6d90
+BUNDLE-022,bundle:bundle-022,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: nn (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,189273,Fix nn.functional.threshold OpInfo reference for strict NumPy uint8 casting,module: nn,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,189267,189273,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #189273 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a4246556c98b38646a23ceb54318838e79edbc79454ff6f2cfda1e7854b53681
+BUNDLE-023,bundle:bundle-023,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: autograd (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,189233,[MPS] Fix avg_pool2d/adaptive_avg_pool2d backward on channels_last inputs,module: autograd,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,175190,189233,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #189233 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9a827fab4dd9e18fb82e9c2ab3701f6d2f8a128f6880da56a205e119054dd24f
+BUNDLE-024,bundle:bundle-024,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: correctness (silent) (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,189129,inductor: Fix non-deterministic gradients in slice_scatter backward fusion,module: correctness (silent),"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,188890,189129,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #189129 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3076951f99e5ce5f404b9e257627f87069c7952337768f26f7b7aab10fcd1c91
+BUNDLE-025,bundle:bundle-025,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: correctness (silent) (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,188791,Fix MKL VML first-call dispatch race producing silent low-precision results,module: correctness (silent),"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,188792,188791,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188791 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=4,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",cbed237a0e6498d5b63c30cf38bcbfefccfe5c8fa128bbae8c8751cd188a8a24
+BUNDLE-026,bundle:bundle-026,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: crash (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,188605,Fix infinite recursion with pybind11 enum conversions,module: crash,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,188547,188605,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #188605 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",478bbb0ff5bb691d23f02bba04c1091f90198ae534e073fefb91a23df81a861a
+BUNDLE-027,bundle:bundle-027,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: correctness (silent) (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,188546,[Inductor] Fix log_sigmoid_forward flushing float32 subnormals to +0.0 on CUDA,module: correctness (silent),"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,188541,188546,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #188546 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ad3101d05d852f7dd2448058aedac24a94063cab0decc998c0ff63aee6a2d12f
+BUNDLE-028,bundle:bundle-028,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: crash (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,188114,Fix CK SDPA flash attention on gfx1200/gfx1201 (RDNA4),module: crash,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,188113,188114,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188114 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d52c4fc8353a3ac26ff86c9a9de9a10a8923b74790d61eab0fb9b9016164672e
+BUNDLE-029,bundle:bundle-029,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: crash (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,188047,fix(dlpack): raise Python RuntimeError instead of aborting for negative DLPack strides,module: crash,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,188023,188047,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #188047 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",34646801082e29dea40497fa42a8c01f4e81e86a9ad3d467ad75df65744343c4
+BUNDLE-030,bundle:bundle-030,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: autograd (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,188039,autograd: fix PyObject* refcount leak in setup_context path,module: autograd,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,188034,188039,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188039 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",819a1fb125e75a75eebd7905d6972f86874e644e7402de62e0af043029f108ac
+BUNDLE-031,bundle:bundle-031,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: crash (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,187955,Make expandable-segment Handle a move-only RAII owner and exception-safe,module: crash,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,188008,187955,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #187955 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=10,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",bccf791837c292b39b8c3c01fc816fa6d3c9675cee633c49926cb9806c0fc518
+BUNDLE-032,bundle:bundle-032,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: correctness (silent) (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,187493,Fix Inductor nextafter for low precision CUDA tensors,module: correctness (silent),"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,187340,187493,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #187493 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",bdfea31db72c712cc0987236e18ff0c1938511b3a6882ccffe2fc852b63afac0
+BUNDLE-033,bundle:bundle-033,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,187486,Fix unbacked memo reuse during fake replay,module: dynamic shapes,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,187415,187486,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #187486 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8393d8a8d02457a3f019f5e632a35daeaee3aa7f96aa110fb3815e1199abcbec
+BUNDLE-034,bundle:bundle-034,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: aotdispatch (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,187311,Preserve forward AD tangents for Inductor dual inputs,module: aotdispatch,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,187284,187311,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #187311 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_cpp_wrapper, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_cpp_wrapper, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_cpp_wrapper, 1, 2,...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",68f50e5e9b14c9cfd641c9bffd644314781b804c8ef832288155ab9b196a8280
+BUNDLE-035,bundle:bundle-035,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: cpu (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,187104,Fix embedding_bag CPU segfault when offsets is empty and indices is not,module: cpu,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,175370,187104,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #187104 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c689e65c4d195b6f0c48ba633af18ed30f1456be29a77b7582d74d20981a5592
+BUNDLE-036,bundle:bundle-036,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: aotdispatch (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186622,Fix bf16 autocast precision barriers in Inductor,module: aotdispatch,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,168126,186622,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #186622 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (i...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1a290c774f1361b322094469918010388638e692062b8caec36a59bc00b3102c
+BUNDLE-037,bundle:bundle-037,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: bc-breaking (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186583,Propagate contextvars to Python autograd functions,module: bc-breaking,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,186537,186583,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186583 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",92701b4a7d8fde7f9d6fdd9f1db5b5e9c7c6cb0c54393eea63c768c6a34c7d91
+BUNDLE-038,bundle:bundle-038,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: custom-operators (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186454,Warn on unsupported custom op schema types,module: custom-operators,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,124863,186454,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186454 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5ea97548d143dc7fcdca5e9522f706e41754726a22c69fe6858b5ad883762855
+BUNDLE-039,bundle:bundle-039,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186395,Preserve overlap deps without blocking fusion,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,186084,186395,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186395 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4e1472be51d4d159f2ce6b4d229bf4f0d9893dcf50e758499e1520eea430c24d
+BUNDLE-040,bundle:bundle-040,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186252,[inductor] Fix truncdiv off-by-one on CUDA with _div_rn,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,184408,186252,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186252 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",fd062cc6d2218b5bbfcfa916b05abf308785ac7dd62968521a38ae2fc75009ed
+BUNDLE-041,bundle:bundle-041,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: crash (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185349,Fix flex decoding BLOCK_M validation for short GQA,module: crash,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,160018,185349,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185349 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",05bc64e5f196b7481685fc38a8aa7da77040a87eec5fb0c74ed416818964c14b
+BUNDLE-042,bundle:bundle-042,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: cuda graphs (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184970,Preserve pin_memory in generated view copy kernels,module: cuda graphs,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,171894,184970,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #184970 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",07876915d14344b8a511988b3136435d560d1e29a9498542223507342ef99044
+BUNDLE-043,bundle:bundle-043,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: decompositions (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184848,Fix nearest upsample scale shortcuts in compile,module: decompositions,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,175154,184848,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #184848 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8355bf8f0f5296e5e7ee7fbf1e685bfdbd04fffdd6adeb32b53f24c17419a8ea
+BUNDLE-044,bundle:bundle-044,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184153,[Inductor] Clone cudagraph-owned grads before replay,module: inductor,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,146569,184153,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #184153 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",be0438f31d9cb989092fd6ea8d6be67bbe91924fe9f26f790f0481829454f3bd
+BUNDLE-045,bundle:bundle-045,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: cuda (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,183881,Fix online softmax epilogue fusion for T5,module: cuda,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,177118,183881,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #183881 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",268709369b045efd2af9c2ed20b559925e9e634593f7c5403d3657d379422ee4
+BUNDLE-046,bundle:bundle-046,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: crash (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,183701,Fix CPU vectorized reduction tail stores,module: crash,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,181690,183701,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #183701 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e9f111966fc5365f5677885fd20bca43e2c71dfedf242786f090d88a199336b6
+BUNDLE-047,bundle:bundle-047,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: crash (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,181516,Fix heap-buffer-overflow in torch.linalg.eig on subnormal real inputs,module: crash,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,162358,181516,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #181516 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",06b4035207ae40b019b858f0d890a99736fc06e13790d38d142e19f4254ba393
+BUNDLE-048,bundle:bundle-048,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: crash (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,181036,Clamp spdiags diagonal length to zero for out-of-range offsets,module: crash,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,178089,181036,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #181036 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c8bd300fa837f53271a0ce43e16a7bb7349b4ae01b84d6bbd80e2452b9c48639
+BUNDLE-049,bundle:bundle-049,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: autograd (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,176234,[autograd] Explicitly error when layer_norm computes 3rd order derivatives,module: autograd,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,186256,176234,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #176234 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",924ec72dbfea8471df483c9b86d3ccf7a4fa2d27f58cf5b6669fa345d162fe69
+BUNDLE-050,bundle:bundle-050,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: crash (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,176070,[rnn] Prevent LSTMCell segfault on input/hidden shape mismatch,module: crash,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,175978,176070,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #176070 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",80046b53d950002cea5ec929165874cf93faf2194ae2d22834924c913287808f
+BUNDLE-051,bundle:bundle-051,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamic shapes (3 issues + 1 PR),pr,184983,Make SDPA backend checks safe for unbacked head dims,module: dynamic shapes,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"124502, 170127, 174608",184983,3,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #184983 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",25b915b8b72720d21a234da1d5b9e6aea7befe6b45b700f4a1e1161e40387f8f
+BUNDLE-052,bundle:bundle-052,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dtensor (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,184508,Fix export with unused DTensor param attrs,module: dtensor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"175467, 184229",184508,2,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #184508 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5d92584854c8729784b964dedbca14b8c8103782bc5976c5e0219edb69e1d0fb
+BUNDLE-053,bundle:bundle-053,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: compile-time (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,189124,[inductor] Cache DSR-expanded single-config reductions,module: compile-time,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,189121,189124,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189124 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",14bc5493fcb4c22e756afcea5ba4688f985af576544276c9d0d80ca349caeb3e
+BUNDLE-054,bundle:bundle-054,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,188965,Fix non-deterministic node ordering in get_source_partitions(),oncall: export,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,147170,188965,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #188965 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",94218f62825bd0496821643130b657f470687eeeaa13cc5ec431c667be0edefb
+BUNDLE-055,bundle:bundle-055,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: oncall: distributed (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,188698,Make Fsspec filesystem checkpointing public and exposing cache_staged_state_dict to enable async save,oncall: distributed,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,188772,188698,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188698 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7fe94c9bb3584283e4c1abeb43d67188d686509fee9a43c999d7b243319f1551
+BUNDLE-056,bundle:bundle-056,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: oncall: quantization (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,187481,Add overflow check to FBGEMM version of quantize_val_arm,oncall: quantization,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,187480,187481,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #187481 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",20d2699e4237b5bd4ba23bedd6280863590a12a9425a9686f69b6325e50263dd
+BUNDLE-057,bundle:bundle-057,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186043,Lower symbolic bool not to torch.sym_not,module: dynamic shapes,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,143157,186043,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186043 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ae5d33a12278f162a4e3972f932d9a5e39aa9e7993984cf20f00e1b8dae5630d
+BUNDLE-058,bundle:bundle-058,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185892,Improve export device mismatch errors,oncall: export,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,184841,185892,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185892 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), +1 more.","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), +1 more, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integra...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b293bde249048a72949641d94bb0493685c4a2b21bc89574cc42d15a88582f7c
+BUNDLE-059,bundle:bundle-059,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185804,Fix non-strict export tensor len handling,oncall: export,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,147326,185804,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185804 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d13aaf4ab1d6fe45198ff6301ae12709d491bc3e7f00c4e1b3721d0fa79f34ef
+BUNDLE-060,bundle:bundle-060,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: oncall: cpu inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185691,Avoid UB in float to signed integer casts,oncall: cpu inductor,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,151510,185691,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185691 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4b4506a350a3c2cbc2fac68bf6058a5c85057ba9f3746754016bbacd63668fdb
+BUNDLE-061,bundle:bundle-061,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: oncall: cpu inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185324,Reject mixed-device fake convolution inputs,oncall: cpu inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,160399,185324,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185324 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8ac76abec3201e0b563b8de356c68d54fa8b7bd4430df865fba4f7131b5b7d80
+BUNDLE-062,bundle:bundle-062,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185108,Prevent non-strict export from leaking fake buffers,oncall: export,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,163189,185108,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185108 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g). Review signal: My agent says I rebased this PR onto current main t...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f3c2e09b5e503eba4328a8766c1eeff611d3e4932512f768145290a1165dbc78
+BUNDLE-063,bundle:bundle-063,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185069,Fix AOTI Windows cross-compile package loading,oncall: export,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,166093,185069,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185069 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, lf-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), +1 more.","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, lf-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), +1 more, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, lf-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (i...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",84570541a56deafdd762ec3d32efd3b4c06d712acbfa73338d55b65607a0b2d3
+BUNDLE-064,bundle:bundle-064,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184967,Fix export CIA decomps with backend kernels,oncall: export,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,171897,184967,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #184967 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b08fd01622aa795417eebc60f61e0294a83dc0cd4b4d5425952118b580dfc962
+BUNDLE-065,bundle:bundle-065,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184966,Preserve unflattened module forward signatures,oncall: export,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,171964,184966,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #184966 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8f36fbe53db47ed53488e406c52ec8ef0ce82dbac0da26c52c1c47f5ddb081fb
+BUNDLE-066,bundle:bundle-066,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184964,Handle tensor scalar slice bounds in export setitem,oncall: export,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,171974,184964,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #184964 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a4007b6fda64a42316ec40bd6b18408c4d10d18a79568db84b5498b9c807944a
+BUNDLE-067,bundle:bundle-067,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184963,Fix FakeTensor shallow copy state,oncall: export,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,171977,184963,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #184963 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), +1 more.","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), +1 more, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (i...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",00ef76a1dc711822c617165b689ea29e898fc03a714a5f3a16beb0542c330bf8
+BUNDLE-068,bundle:bundle-068,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184961,Fix packed RNN export fake metadata,oncall: export,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,171978,184961,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #184961 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9930065c5dfc48f1808779ad35846b9c5bc1361770365d808b9e3efb2fc71bae
+BUNDLE-069,bundle:bundle-069,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: correctness (silent) (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184950,Fix mkldnn transposed conv pointwise shape inference,module: correctness (silent),"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,172711,184950,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #184950 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-cuda13.0-py3.10-gcc11 / test (default, 2, 5, linux.g6.4xlarge.experimental.nvidia.gpu), linux-jammy-cuda13.0-py3.10-gcc11 / test-osdc (default, 1, 5, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-l4), linux-jammy-rocm-py3.10-mi355 / test (default, 1, 10, linux.rocm.gpu.gfx950.1).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-cuda13.0-py3.10-gcc11 / test (default, 2, 5, linux.g6.4xlarge.experimental.nvidia.gpu), linux-jammy-cuda13.0-py3.10-gcc11 / test-osdc (default, 1, 5, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-l4), linux-jammy-rocm-py3.10-mi355 / test (default, 1, 10, linux.rocm.gpu.gfx950.1), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-cuda13.0-py3.10-gcc11 / test (default, 2, 5, linux.g6.4xlarge.experimental.nvidia.gpu), linux-jammy-cuda13.0-py3.10-gcc11 / test-osdc (default, 1, 5, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-l4), linux-jammy-rocm-py3.10-mi355 / test (default, 1, 10, linux.rocm.gpu.gfx950.1).",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c74f80d39bfaa9bfb75e7dd681b40c9fd1e0504562af3cbbcb21421065511ea6
+BUNDLE-070,bundle:bundle-070,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184948,Fix dynamo export for tensor closures in output pytrees,oncall: export,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,172839,184948,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #184948 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",27634fe3cac1379cf1c5a0ed5d8b55d332d40a0edb5c721fc3871d0303b2dc6e
+BUNDLE-071,bundle:bundle-071,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184787,[export] Deserialize PT2 schema in C++ during load,oncall: export,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,176428,184787,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #184787 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",546d27e7727b9a4b70df2f8af703e040ef08baccdf92c38fe515f3fdb9edb8d8
+BUNDLE-072,bundle:bundle-072,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184667,Fix cond branch tensor constants in run_decompositions,oncall: export,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,180354,184667,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #184667 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4d55925611d3baece24ffc6c0d9580aef91f767e85985d2e04b0172e11c65138
+BUNDLE-073,bundle:bundle-073,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: arm (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,182224,Enable skipped static_runtime tests on AArch64,module: arm,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,178522,182224,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #182224 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8ca09c59378b648f03dbd68bcf446a3f1dd2a1d79a209ae84603b47578300a4e
+BUNDLE-074,bundle:bundle-074,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: oncall: distributed (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,178844,[c10d] Support stacked output tensors in Gloo all_gather_into_tensor …,oncall: distributed,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,178798,178844,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #178844 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",13ca35d576116ce2fc6c60c65212efbd95f9f7c4903e746597fe304dd2d34222
+BUNDLE-075,bundle:bundle-075,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: onnx (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185300,Fix AttrProxy module reuse in Dynamo,module: onnx,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,161053,185300,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185300 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",dbf47e21c678698b69621c92331f9651a694220548b732ac632d93a3ed7244b5
+BUNDLE-076,bundle:bundle-076,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185025,[export][serde] Initialize symbol ranges before constants,oncall: export,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,167872,185025,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185025 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8b8bd7bc8fdadb191fe84b09988fc18ef869319b12344329e6c0fbe4902a4b7e
+BUNDLE-077,bundle:bundle-077,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: arm (3 issues + 1 PR),pr,166876,[ci][cpu] Update AArch64 manylinux compiler to GCC14,module: arm,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"168288, 172445, 172632",166876,3,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #166876 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0622461bc70d7e36d62a2b94f2d892110f68cb785dc6d02004cd1feaf5b1aa3d
+BUNDLE-078,bundle:bundle-078,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: crash (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186021,[Inductor][CPU] Guard compiled integer div by zero,module: crash,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,143649,186021,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186021 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1d6564327d3e5f879b50ab7272a03824469372aef3f3de26861e1e84b611d329
+BUNDLE-079,bundle:bundle-079,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185984,Fix Dynamo out= resize for internal tensors,module: dynamo,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,145220,185984,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185984 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",eef4633d17c27f8d3ad095f503a385422202c80fd6a3c8901fa26c27152de5b5
+BUNDLE-080,bundle:bundle-080,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: crash (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185809,Fix as_strided_copy storage bounds in Inductor,module: crash,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,147077,185809,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185809 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0c5add6f45ae1fbf9969b85217a1a4d93a73647bb4cb46fe53a9cb798c8fce3a
+BUNDLE-081,bundle:bundle-081,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: crash (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,181062,Validate grad_output shape in multi_margin_loss_backward,module: crash,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,146790,181062,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #181062 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2625c1fba75df50f69848c3ee6ae6fb40e17a7be9f0130798de14e2242c20cfc
+BUNDLE-082,bundle:bundle-082,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: aotinductor (10 issues + 7 PRs),pr,186361,Improve autograd.Function backward graph grad names,module: aotinductor,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"130182, 136216, 137520, 140842, 144360, 145093, 145231, 158088, 186031, 186136","183884, 184161, 185433, 185976, 186011, 186094, 186361",10,7,failed_ci_checks,"PR #186361 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (i...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4eb94d8ad262d64d1bb4abd2a24b2a876152b08ceaeb5df50612f39a0b5ece7c
+BUNDLE-083,bundle:bundle-083,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamo (7 issues + 5 PRs),pr,185953,Clear Dynamo weakrefs before graph-break resumes,module: dynamo,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"145529, 153056, 170137, 170770, 170781, 186796, 187008","184975, 184976, 185953, 186801, 187090",7,5,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185953 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, lf-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, lf-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, lf-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (i...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",19278b5ca2c53a46a948eb6c427c8bdf077ba915f450df29cac8930a2f4408af
+BUNDLE-084,bundle:bundle-084,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: oncall: export (3 issues + 2 PRs),pr,185059,Fix non-strict export tensor subclass attr tracing,oncall: export,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"167007, 170672, 188153","184978, 185059",3,2,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185059 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c7f4ced5f868fc7b79fcb7a56b8bd2473b1729d3a2652fd51a2a924aa6b2e674
+BUNDLE-085,bundle:bundle-085,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: error checking (3 issues + 1 PR),pr,186016,Reject invalid bitwise dtypes in Inductor lowering,module: error checking,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"139124, 144247, 144362",186016,3,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186016 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",bbe5363975dbe8eb7c29fa6baae4b8b6fa592ff1fa91955680b7605dffbe2876
+BUNDLE-086,bundle:bundle-086,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: oncall: cpu inductor (3 issues + 1 PR),pr,185939,Fix int8 WoQ GEMM residual epilogue fusion,oncall: cpu inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"145687, 145709, 145711",185939,3,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185939 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (i...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7dbf7cb6ed82c456e1031756e663a15ea96966404caa569d7fcb2910cc55ba8f
+BUNDLE-087,bundle:bundle-087,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: aotdispatch (3 issues + 1 PR),pr,185124,Fix prims.broadcast_in_dim functionalization,module: aotdispatch,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"157610, 162734, 163037",185124,3,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #185124 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1cf6f713185a7bea61ec1bdd75ed96d174b50d2bb02de2cb26094e36393f3af2
+BUNDLE-088,bundle:bundle-088,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: oncall: export (2 issues + 2 PRs),pr,186418,Fix AOT export GraphModule serialization,oncall: export,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"128554, 161671","185170, 186418",2,2,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186418 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9a3876c8b9885a9ab02c7942d975a1b0e842f4bccde7c0b29dcf42708a00352e
+BUNDLE-089,bundle:bundle-089,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: aotdispatch (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,185803,Fix joint export for tied parameter aliases,module: aotdispatch,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"101192, 147380",185803,2,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185803 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1566bb17f9e7e1c3adc407e5351763a779987c0eb72eda2b3543a9e83ae9a74f
+BUNDLE-090,bundle:bundle-090,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186900,Improve pytree missing registration error,oncall: export,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,140615,186900,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186900 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",23e5be16d9feac92943530030baa54d14f18db9e014e68c7284578fa4292e366
+BUNDLE-091,bundle:bundle-091,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186898,Add always-on AOTI input rank checks,oncall: export,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,141115,186898,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186898 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0c062fbaa33b4ab2dac319753fd12e0dfca311effd805a5faf9a17451427aeed
+BUNDLE-092,bundle:bundle-092,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186894,Fix non-strict export of vmap tensor indexing,oncall: export,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,158540,186894,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186894 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",98ef9512fa75afaa319e846ecb2c9adf603eb60081eb3890695ae5c85970e5fa
+BUNDLE-093,bundle:bundle-093,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186879,Fix export dynamic shapes for variadic kwargs,oncall: export,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,164313,186879,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186879 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ca72b21a98b859c92e1ee6960f226130b2da5ef39e35414bab46f873771e680a
+BUNDLE-094,bundle:bundle-094,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: ci (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186833,Remove stale export OpInfo xfails,module: ci,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,170539,186833,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186833 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",663e5d98c96ca829ceecb118e71ad1bb5ae3f81ae1acd93321315320258b0319
+BUNDLE-095,bundle:bundle-095,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: compile ux (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186119,Improve Dynamo observed exception messages,module: compile ux,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,140607,186119,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186119 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",aec5be7d96ef0d542389f89c1144fc42afd74eb06113008e396a3a23e300e982
+BUNDLE-096,bundle:bundle-096,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: oncall: cpu inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186118,Preserve guard eval defaulting without callback churn,oncall: cpu inductor,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,140683,186118,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186118 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",cfdf2e9c7f3c9639cc58c7423b2ea58ef20abff55335c8c40c10188951a34216
+BUNDLE-097,bundle:bundle-097,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186058,Preserve export graph metadata during normalization,oncall: export,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,141640,186058,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186058 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",525bccfe100be7514393d41d489f01db7231102c39e2ed44eb358b87edefb4c2
+BUNDLE-098,bundle:bundle-098,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185952,Support compiled async all_reduce wait,oncall: export,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,145574,185952,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185952 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d7364095481678e6be25960195a6a155909f504e92a34a508e0eb02f9ae041b3
+BUNDLE-099,bundle:bundle-099,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185926,Preserve tuple arguments in export serde,oncall: export,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,145785,185926,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185926 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",dc668de0d78653808df45622ca7c4e79cdc7d0860453faa4854b764ed395e6b9
+BUNDLE-100,bundle:bundle-100,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185568,Fix export of arange with data-dependent float step,oncall: export,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,153247,185568,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185568 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9283f24fa260e3e6c12c15c00e9a633a5fc9e5c44ec8267265b07fdbf02faafd
+BUNDLE-101,bundle:bundle-101,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185564,Handle pre-dispatch export of subclass tensor constants,oncall: export,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,153387,185564,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185564 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b7755e118f88535f491239aa7099ad4db269ab84b8acb45d5c5887ba64a5580d
+BUNDLE-102,bundle:bundle-102,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185545,Handle symbolic bounds in slice decomposition,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,154137,185545,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185545 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6b3d12140f36cd354c49af6233f497b4d77b1f314225423070f2913a873b8f2a
+BUNDLE-103,bundle:bundle-103,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185504,Support unbacked SymInt closures in cond export,oncall: export,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,154559,185504,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185504 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",879f3055b37f3f7987cf29e3586858ddead44630e47d8d45cb5d4a686383f002
+BUNDLE-104,bundle:bundle-104,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185499,Fix unbacked memo reuse during decomposition retrace,oncall: export,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,154647,185499,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #185499 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",be12b5ffc21ad48b7adfd13ae8e44827ec6042d5bd4c5ec7004bafa76fb4c0e5
+BUNDLE-105,bundle:bundle-105,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: infra (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185460,Fix CPU perf smoketest baseline drift checks,module: infra,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,156511,185460,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185460 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0531278b9d44b939180dacefecbc46734103c0eaa3524b6946257228c4564038
+BUNDLE-106,bundle:bundle-106,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: oncall: cpu inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185450,Fix reinplace alias checks for index_put,oncall: cpu inductor,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,156786,185450,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185450 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",42ee9ed0c030e687024862cb4af05909dc341853e0be482be139467766cc951c
+BUNDLE-107,bundle:bundle-107,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: aotinductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185404,[inductor] Fold small-row expanded bmm to mm in post-grad,module: aotinductor,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,159346,185404,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185404 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",08b27937388b403f16f20ecaa47c89972bc1134883e71292ae818051eb57625c
+BUNDLE-108,bundle:bundle-108,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: onnx (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185371,Fix symbolic antialiased resize export shapes,module: onnx,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,159468,185371,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185371 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, win-vs2022-cpu-py3 / build, win-vs2022-cuda13.0-py3 / build, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, win-vs2022-cpu-py3 / build, win-vs2022-cuda13.0-py3 / build, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, win-vs2022-cpu-py3 / build, win-vs2022-cuda13.0-py3 / build, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",38aeda9371a44f8e41f68d433f670b243caceb482a13d6ecd3828775bdfc49ce
+BUNDLE-109,bundle:bundle-109,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185353,Normalize export state names for subclass decomposition,oncall: export,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,159918,185353,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #185353 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f06e829588e53188e1ea5cd1ac9d0655d1687b312352584caadf3833d62d6344
+BUNDLE-110,bundle:bundle-110,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185150,Preserve OrderedDict outputs in FX tracing,oncall: export,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,161807,185150,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #185150 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ef2d385df7f5bf58bf586325c2d3aefc72465c85d4d6afb73e820d3209378d95
+BUNDLE-111,bundle:bundle-111,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: aotdispatch (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185140,Preserve reentrant checkpoint in non-strict export,module: aotdispatch,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,162386,185140,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185140 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a92430a922b3c97032a538ed318063874541b186e3224805c8337a127858dfe9
+BUNDLE-112,bundle:bundle-112,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185106,Fix non-strict export state aliases,oncall: export,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,163303,185106,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185106 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",aa992302d439dc1c03503ccdba499c4e0060ccd8a8469f8d94c2bb43f7a61e1a
+BUNDLE-113,bundle:bundle-113,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185105,Fix export move_to_device_pass device rewrites,oncall: export,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,163323,185105,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185105 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",13de415cf328a9fe8ce3672178d0a37435dbbb16e09fdcba0c280c16f5d0fbda
+BUNDLE-114,bundle:bundle-114,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185100,Keep fake tensor cache synthesis out of proxy traces,oncall: export,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,163713,185100,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185100 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4f0f6bdc84d2422a03d9270a1158813e8bb3c1e6a7f17ee5052664f3abadd80e
+BUNDLE-115,bundle:bundle-115,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185084,Avoid contiguity guards on maybe-singleton symbolic dims,module: dynamic shapes,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,165032,185084,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185084 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",13e39ec6effdaaa8a6ddf911b8cb5a2401b11a4181d31fa564a8d6729019c3e5
+BUNDLE-116,bundle:bundle-116,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185082,Preserve lifted SymInts during strict export capture,oncall: export,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,165073,185082,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185082 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",521c90c028e774a1bb22947cdbf45cd418e7306eb475005a185d020c21f3ce9f
+BUNDLE-117,bundle:bundle-117,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185073,[export] Treat free new-tracer state as constants,oncall: export,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,165641,185073,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185073 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",af7b415eab0ac0ee3a3d5374ea0c587c182bbbd23dd365fb0736a0cbaf87289b
+BUNDLE-118,bundle:bundle-118,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184985,Fix nested compile handling in AOT joint export,oncall: export,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,169991,184985,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #184985 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8e3571090a45e1e96d1fa96551fefe8daadbba8ce069d8e968dda45f8c230730
+BUNDLE-119,bundle:bundle-119,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: 64-bit (183 issues + 2 PRs),pr,188012,Add sparse triangular_solve CPU fallback,module: 64-bit,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"1359, 1369, 2129, 3877, 8853, 9222, 9674, 10043, 12308, 12498, 13246, 14945, 17902, 18904, 19149, 20433, 22402, 23159, 24041, 24185, 27312, 28090, 28307, 28308, 28318, 28319, 28320, 28329, 28341, 29137, 29758, 29973, 31837, 31945, 32097, 32288, 32293, 32570, 32998, 33041, 34279, 34651, 35529, 35641, 40471, 40568, 40570, 41128, 41793, 43116, 43949, 44634, 45833, 45897, 45996, 46164, 46225, 46544, 46829, 46999, 48088, 48628, 50010, 50342, 50343, 50344, 50345, 50382, 51450, 51509, 51720, 51962, 53441, 53704, 53900, 54766, 55279, 55299, 55366, 56356, 56485, 56586, 56697, 56764, 57610, 57947, 58489, 58734, 58736, 58741, 58742, 58743, 58745, 58770, 58828, 59058, 59099, 59101, 59104, 59545, 59786, 59787, 59868, 60858, 61417, 61453, 61474, 61486, 61490, 61523, 61582, 61653, 62352, 62784, 62812, 63293, 63870, 64023, 64208, 64254, 64359, 64897, 68105, 68291, 69491, 70906, 70910, 70914, 70915, 70916, 70919, 70920, 70921, 70924, 70925, 71209, 71386, 71403, 72824, 76644, 80553, 83818, 86055, 87085, 87358, 87366, 87448, 89255, 92141, 94779, 101699, 103352, 103581, 105465, 106584, 106614, 106667, 106991, 108565, 108977, 109017, 109108, 114951, 115819, 123082, 124505, 127622, 132559, 133676, 135704, 135724, 135826, 136264, 139792, 142358, 143588, 145624, 148077, 150612, 151912, 156308, 165612, 187389","186051, 188012",183,2,failed_ci_checks,PR #186051 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",432087367b3a66565142245df32b79d7a20ab5d7aa071899b7210d16d4bb88ff
+BUNDLE-120,bundle:bundle-120,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: activation checkpointing (81 issues + 1 PR),pr,186539,[Dynamo] Limit FX node growth from loop unrolling,module: activation checkpointing,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"2628, 23756, 26288, 29697, 30291, 31557, 32021, 35666, 37410, 41081, 41243, 41353, 42959, 46168, 46184, 50122, 50688, 54389, 55135, 58997, 61686, 62448, 62530, 64730, 66073, 66707, 67586, 67760, 67761, 67958, 68332, 68648, 68978, 68979, 69972, 70173, 71683, 72146, 78917, 79197, 82464, 83159, 86590, 89116, 92884, 94652, 95408, 96136, 101082, 102839, 103444, 103588, 104849, 105255, 106624, 110761, 111003, 111441, 112303, 112901, 113287, 113914, 114206, 115626, 118758, 118966, 125531, 128046, 129889, 148819, 158371, 158968, 159765, 161302, 162591, 166208, 166209, 168044, 171302, 173559, 175891",186539,81,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186539 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5dbb0958b2bfb89ebced1ae19f56fea80a130fa1e1cd2eed4c4f027ae1495d29
+BUNDLE-121,bundle:bundle-121,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: build (11 issues + 6 PRs),pr,189263,Remove the Miniconda base env from the CD builder images,module: build,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"108406, 119526, 157807, 160875, 163311, 164469, 169479, 179374, 180624, 183913, 188898","180247, 180248, 180250, 185208, 187633, 189263",11,6,failed_ci_checks,PR #189263 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2ddd9977ace06bc78dd3f79e62245f184cd393867d8c3bb51fcbdc6d1c12c13e
+BUNDLE-122,bundle:bundle-122,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,185085,[dynamo] Support datetime.now attrs as runtime inputs,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"125171, 164922",185085,2,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185085 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8). Review signal: My agent says I rebased the PR onto current main and resubmitted it; the prior CI failures were all SIGKILLs in test_serialization_2gb_file, and current...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",bb2f2bfa88235e2f3fba20176223d7fb1a1ec92df030f86aaba60c47cde23f3a
+BUNDLE-123,bundle:bundle-123,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dtensor (1 issue + 2 PRs),pr,182377,[DTensor] SymmetricMemory-backed DTensors,module: dtensor,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,182382,"182377, 182379",1,2,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #182377 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2c97a13c6dc19446cea04dd2896e1134f062ccb95be2a26e7ef83cce620ed090
+BUNDLE-124,bundle:bundle-124,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: oncall: profiler (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,189097,[RFC] Expose Kineto custom logger registration,oncall: profiler,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,189098,189097,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189097 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ab8556bd88b18627028f2696ea7cad5fb43e2fa192c50499e296afa768aa41d0
+BUNDLE-125,bundle:bundle-125,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: dynamo (1 issue + 3 PRs),pr,181357,[dynamo] Add polyfill for operator.indexOf,module: dynamo,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,116396,"176830, 181357, 188966",1,3,failed_ci_checks,PR #181357 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ada213f214e579ed67343fba3b864f742280ebb0b288b80c2880bf86b60ed25d
+BUNDLE-126,bundle:bundle-126,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: compile-time (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,187952,Fix out= variant recompilations for torch.max/min/topk,module: compile-time,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"135859, 187953",187952,2,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #187952 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=8,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",41ccb98803dffc48ef7169c01fc63cb217f5ecc41436605a0052d01a4f854f28
+BUNDLE-127,bundle:bundle-127,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: logging (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,188967,Update logging docs to match current API,module: logging,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,137285,188967,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188967 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1861cf9ff25011f9f75c412b6c85b5b12522427b88d49de2b5ea6dfb219363d3
+BUNDLE-128,bundle:bundle-128,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186488,Improve schema errors for symbolic int list mismatches,module: dynamic shapes,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,122129,186488,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186488 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",34f5e0cff3e07fa25f33947288c817b45824c3b7a338ac93fdd218a1cacbf5c5
+BUNDLE-129,bundle:bundle-129,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185782,fix: [PT2] [Hardening] Track recompiles alongside graph breaks in our actu...,module: dynamo,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,113040,185782,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185782 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6e258f29c09d7d9c43830534ade1603c40f56d788ea7b1f48530d8c353f1d75e
+BUNDLE-130,bundle:bundle-130,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184460,Remove obsolete Python wrapper symbol extraction,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,102870,184460,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #184460 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e458e3abcb21315cae788d6f303f8909512be1a40f6b2bd0a0d1ef20044973c6
+BUNDLE-131,bundle:bundle-131,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: optimizer (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,179273,[optim] support of dynamic coefficients and normalization in Muon,module: optimizer,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,179250,179273,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #179273 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=7,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2b2c760c15271141a0d685744599f7d0e03b638479ce63636627ac9e87ca73df
+BUNDLE-132,bundle:bundle-132,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: oncall: export (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,185786,Handle non-natural SymPy powers in value range interp,oncall: export,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"136628, 148003",185786,2,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185786 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c04a9f027bf18dfb35962b6a39a9fd30c435f06d5a251285223615cda7d0c21e
+BUNDLE-133,bundle:bundle-133,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: cuda graphs (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,188641,Mark linalg.eigh as cudagraph-unsafe in Inductor,module: cuda graphs,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,188355,188641,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #188641 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",89b8da4618c369a1871914f647658e3c6db3b2bac557eff602184079f0e67a23
+BUNDLE-134,bundle:bundle-134,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186849,Fix CuTeDSL grouped_mm descriptor init shape,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,176178,186849,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186849 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6c21b8d52e1199e0449765f2d945df20d926f5781797a80022873668b042044e
+BUNDLE-135,bundle:bundle-135,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: proxytensor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186261,Fix pre-dispatch tracing for saved tensor detach,module: proxytensor,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,137009,186261,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186261 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f881f4a6958b98a6e337a65201f5eb407ad88fd61563ed998f0939a2b96698f6
+BUNDLE-136,bundle:bundle-136,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: flex attention (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185784,Fix flex attention captured vector gradient scatters,module: flex attention,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,148112,185784,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185784 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e68611630d4e07a4e41f11720dfdf296a3874e60d782256af5fbe91b30404567
+BUNDLE-137,bundle:bundle-137,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: aotdispatch (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185742,Support None leaves in nonstrict_trace,module: aotdispatch,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,149963,185742,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185742 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a4b0141dcb42d0add9699128d2e8519ab6cc95735ea75e1964c9689ce16158c9
+BUNDLE-138,bundle:bundle-138,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: faketensor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185732,Fix nested compile during subclass fake tracing,module: faketensor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,150262,185732,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185732 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5772ac18abd1e8ca4b6f5f0c63d21a510eccaffa001dc191d39cedb9c0c3d993
+BUNDLE-139,bundle:bundle-139,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184977,Fix Dynamo wrapper method sources for nested compile,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,170696,184977,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #184977 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-cpu-core-test (3.12) / test (inductor_core, 2, 2, linux.c7i.2xlarge).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-cpu-core-test (3.12) / test (inductor_core, 2, 2, linux.c7i.2xlarge), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-cpu-core-test (3.12) / test (inductor_core, 2, 2, linux.c7i.2xlarge). Review signal: My agent says I addressed the review note about the single-iteration loop by adding a short comment in the regression test explaining that it mirrors the original nested compile repro. I also rebased and resubmitted t...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d8f26305fdc556439b5adbf8588a748ccda25c8d8c2518f1bfb3bb6044689316
+BUNDLE-140,bundle:bundle-140,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: oncall: pt2 (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184934,Validate packed RNN batch_sizes before fallback,oncall: pt2,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,173046,184934,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #184934 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",01cd0668ccc74b4533a1c24a6a223f61fc9e04873b1e1d2045cface766f34547
+BUNDLE-141,bundle:bundle-141,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: 64-bit (19 issues + 4 PRs),pr,188816,"[Metal][ops] remove nonzero INT_MAX limit, widen to 64-bit (#149325)",module: 64-bit,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"77764, 83264, 83968, 84489, 97310, 98169, 102852, 111173, 113062, 130430, 136692, 140570, 140718, 141287, 149261, 149325, 154052, 157648, 178492","184779, 184780, 186540, 188816",19,4,contributor_update_needed,PR #188816 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",46baf4849802e5828369fe2e367fdc40e4a507b1a02ca5134b4f1bb95e26c6cf
+BUNDLE-142,bundle:bundle-142,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: aotdispatch (13 issues + 22 PRs),pr,186476,Fix Dynamo resume tensor lifetimes across graph breaks,module: aotdispatch,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"122512, 156075, 162151, 167729, 167732, 168393, 170487, 170496, 170834, 171158, 174929, 182842, 187806","160585, 163503, 171826, 181680, 184974, 185033, 185034, 185149, 185524, 186100, 186476, 187468, 187469, 187531, 187532, 187707, 188173, 189091, 189092, 189234, 189291, 189324",13,22,failed_ci_checks,PR #186476 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",23fd6be2f7983636d5dcd3a85c493ee8185b9dd1da9ce7953dab2bd1e5102ef8
+BUNDLE-143,bundle:bundle-143,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: __torch_dispatch__ (7 issues + 1 PR),pr,186517,Detect aliased subclass inputs after desugaring,module: __torch_dispatch__,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"114397, 114403, 114411, 114412, 114413, 114414, 114415",186517,7,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186517 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8a9967edaf431f1adb4e16b4e2c60c68666a98ba75f674659b7b62f89efeba9f
+BUNDLE-144,bundle:bundle-144,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: backend (3 issues + 3 PRs),pr,184997,Fix TVM backend scalar tensor inputs,module: backend,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"169111, 169188, 188866","184997, 189010, 189125",3,3,failed_ci_checks,PR #184997 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b164701f5b6e7f838346c38bb994d4c49efe70f0c83695d6ef876d8a419bd3ce
+BUNDLE-145,bundle:bundle-145,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: dynamic shapes (3 issues + 3 PRs),pr,185288,Support symbolic list lengths in Triton grids,module: dynamic shapes,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"161111, 161113, 161119","184051, 185280, 185288",3,3,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185288 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g). Review signal: My agent says I rebased this PR onto current main, resolved the `torch/_dynamo/variables/lists.py` conflict by preserving the symbolic-length guard with the current `InstructionTransl...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",cc8114fe481e665b156fa878850ed2cafb3422e9665e0e04b8986799d5fdbcf0
+BUNDLE-146,bundle:bundle-146,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: compile-time (3 issues + 3 PRs),pr,170644,[dynamo] Support dict assignment with lazy constant keys,module: compile-time,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"174541, 187590, 187591","170092, 170644, 184858",3,3,failed_ci_checks,PR #170644 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup. Review signal: @pytorchbot rebase,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3b6583adaf3d001671c9f7ac702c538a9b60c6650e7db681481f56aa4053f308
+BUNDLE-147,bundle:bundle-147,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: flaky-tests (1 issue + 4 PRs),pr,189286,Fix DeviceContext mode leaks from checkpoint recompute and set_default_device restore,module: flaky-tests,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,189133,"188100, 188299, 188573, 189286",1,4,failed_ci_checks,PR #188573 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f8d1d7a6fe867e94fd62d4e79739a9bfd0911cb695653f127c3457f25dd4580c
+BUNDLE-148,bundle:bundle-148,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: correctness (silent) (3 issues + 1 PR),pr,187243,Reject p < 1 in triplet_margin_loss to prevent NaN from p-norm overflow,module: correctness (silent),"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"184036, 187178, 187179",187243,3,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #187243 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=22,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",bf3a2dd79b0f9a107ca367c763e1af99a9f6e6d1e39281ec5250cf38ed305b65
+BUNDLE-149,bundle:bundle-149,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: compile-time (3 issues + 1 PR),pr,186614,Delay RNN graph break until module call,module: compile-time,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"141184, 158007, 185135",186614,3,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186614 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4642218dcababa23c2f370b4752a7d705375ea17237313604fc878fbbcbf5faf
+BUNDLE-150,bundle:bundle-150,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: dynamo (3 issues + 1 PR),pr,185347,Support torch.compile under user FakeTensorMode,module: dynamo,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"136446, 136586, 160057",185347,3,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185347 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18-asan / test-osdc (default, 7, 7, mt-l-x86iavx512-16-128), linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18-asan / test-osdc (default, 5, 7, mt-l-x86iavx512-16-128), linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18-asan / test-osdc (default, 6, 7, mt-l-x86iavx512-16-128), linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18-asan / test (default, 2, 7, linux.4xlarge), linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18-asan / test-osdc (default, 3, 7, mt-l-x86iavx512-16-128), +39 more.","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18-asan / test-osdc (default, 7, 7, mt-l-x86iavx512-16-128), linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18-asan / test-osdc (default, 5, 7, mt-l-x86iavx512-16-128), linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18-asan / test-osdc (default, 6, 7, mt-l-x86iavx512-16-128), linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18-asan / test (default, 2, 7, linux.4xlarge), linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18-asan / test-osdc (default, 3, 7, mt-l-x86iavx512-16-128), +39 more, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18-asan / test-osdc (default, 7, 7, mt-l-x86iavx512-16-128), linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18-asan / test-osdc (default, 5, 7, mt-l-x86iavx512-16-128), linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18-asan / test-osdc (default, 6, 7, mt-l-x86iavx512-16-128), linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18-asan / test (default, 2, 7, linux.4xlarge), linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18-asan / test-osdc (default, 3,...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9ae8cf331e2ba51c8f34d4cfca7ff98dc5aff6a343665cbce7fcc96e597ef212
+BUNDLE-151,bundle:bundle-151,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (3 issues + 1 PR),pr,184990,[dynamo] Route fake RuntimeError through user exception handlers,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"157217, 169538, 183887",184990,3,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #184990 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g). Review signal: My agent says I rebased t...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",843064c3243ddca7e0406291753b8875388183d17de367d36abe095cbceb76b6
+BUNDLE-152,bundle:bundle-152,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: dynamo (2 issues + 2 PRs),pr,185050,Handle SymInt sizes in lazy module initialization,module: dynamo,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"167191, 173252","173948, 185050",2,2,failed_ci_checks,PR #173948 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",94ad9bf0b51e226b809eb30ee69a9edf99fe42dcafa90b2574844e555fc0746b
+BUNDLE-153,bundle:bundle-153,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: xpu (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,189224,[xpu][skip] Skip test_combo_kernel_dynamic_scale_rblock on XPU,module: xpu,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"187810, 187811",189224,2,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #189224 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2dc7009fccc906bc2258e76e21997c1caf07414fba1f308b60ad1c237912b701
+BUNDLE-154,bundle:bundle-154,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: flaky-tests (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,189215,[MPS] Add `largeTensorTest` to `test_group_norm_backward_large_input`,module: flaky-tests,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"186605, 186867",189215,2,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #189215 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",bb25b38e0784e6b1c41f0bc8ef50901bf35463dc89f2d8f590eb1c67c87f6749
+BUNDLE-155,bundle:bundle-155,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: cuda (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,189145,[Dynamo] Preserve Stream/Event subclass types in graph reconstruction,module: cuda,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"188325, 188405",189145,2,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189145 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8b8929da5f318cd5fe362000ec2b201a25dbee9ee9b370a166c3fe239fac5527
+BUNDLE-156,bundle:bundle-156,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamic shapes (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,188636,Handle reciprocal SymPy powers in shape range eval,module: dynamic shapes,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"188422, 188423",188636,2,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #188636 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d8f4383a9a6c6043176e7c664889f94bac54db40e6c1db128811936f9dec9a1c
+BUNDLE-157,bundle:bundle-157,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: correctness (silent) (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,187353,Preserve signed zero in Triton neg lowering,module: correctness (silent),"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"187336, 187721",187353,2,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #187353 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ad3819894f40135ea3f927adbb2974f7a288366221898dd9d5e5391c1f7e1ea7
+BUNDLE-158,bundle:bundle-158,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: aotdispatch (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,186403,Avoid CUDA init during CPU torch.compile,module: aotdispatch,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"97894, 129131",186403,2,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186403 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",454507e16c02e71e0e83310fa6c9a17ebcd8fc4895790b20be7c97b6e91048db
+BUNDLE-159,bundle:bundle-159,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: custom-operators (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,185718,Fix fake functorch-wrapped tensor handling in jacfwd vmap,module: custom-operators,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"151196, 172428",185718,2,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185718 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4f8fa7f51571c3da4d29eaf4ae9c9a00c5510bc40028c24e0fb552519a88df19
+BUNDLE-160,bundle:bundle-160,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamic shapes (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,185369,Fix dynamic output sizes for adaptive avg pool lowering,module: dynamic shapes,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"159550, 185575",185369,2,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185369 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d601a29884d3c9178d0d65bbcd0a31a29bbea7589d4a5186e2c2f5071da79de5
+BUNDLE-161,bundle:bundle-161,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: aotdispatch (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,185043,Functionalize mutations in deferred local_map,module: aotdispatch,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"167568, 182403",185043,2,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #185043 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6aa0ece2976fb7c21cce8a8921d4697db864b31e35025098372416ed12366c5a
+BUNDLE-162,bundle:bundle-162,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: autograd (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,184958,Prevent escaped vjp TensorWrappers from reaching AOTAutograd,module: autograd,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"172026, 179510",184958,2,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #184958 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18-asan / test (default, 4, 7, linux.4xlarge), linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18-asan / test-osdc (default, 5, 7, mt-l-x86iavx512-16-128), linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18-asan / test-osdc (default, 4, 7, mt-l-x86iavx512-16-128), linux-jammy-py3.10-gcc11 / test-osdc (default, 4, 5, mt-l-x86iavx512-16-128), linux-jammy-py3.10-gcc11 / test (default, 4, 5, linux.4xlarge), +18 more.","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18-asan / test (default, 4, 7, linux.4xlarge), linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18-asan / test-osdc (default, 5, 7, mt-l-x86iavx512-16-128), linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18-asan / test-osdc (default, 4, 7, mt-l-x86iavx512-16-128), linux-jammy-py3.10-gcc11 / test-osdc (default, 4, 5, mt-l-x86iavx512-16-128), linux-jammy-py3.10-gcc11 / test (default, 4, 5, linux.4xlarge), +18 more, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18-asan / test (default, 4, 7, linux.4xlarge), linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18-asan / test-osdc (default, 5, 7, mt-l-x86iavx512-16-128), linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18-asan / test-osdc (default, 4, 7, mt-l-x86iavx512-16-128), linux-jammy-py3.10-gcc11 / test-osdc (default, 4, 5, mt-l-x86iavx512-16-128), linux-jammy-py3.10-gcc11 / test (default, 4, 5, linux.4xlarge),...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",823e5e6b31f466111d2ee643913f9e62390ea4849d6f3e670bd53f1c7a6c2c77
+BUNDLE-163,bundle:bundle-163,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: cuda graphs (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,184639,Support None returns from torch.cond,module: cuda graphs,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"181891, 182036",184639,2,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #184639 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_huggingface, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_huggingface, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_huggingface, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",124fc772ae14d684d7f816078f3484ec8a6c18627ce56ac042501fb130f0f901
+BUNDLE-164,bundle:bundle-164,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamic shapes (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,183908,Fix deferred runtime assert symbol availability,module: dynamic shapes,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"154146, 176770",183908,2,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #183908 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8eed892f0f40d0af520cc0157ba1c9b9ea884746d96cb70cbc65c7870e61ea64
+BUNDLE-165,bundle:bundle-165,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: cpu (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,181895,[CUDA] Fix linspace integer dtype precision mismatch with CPU,module: cpu,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"180156, 181807",181895,2,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #181895 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",269c235eccf0c05aa85fdb1898a057fad915f095f5bdd133ce2739ad7fd6b65f
+BUNDLE-166,bundle:bundle-166,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: dynamo (1 issue + 2 PRs),pr,187890,Fix Dynamo metadata sync after inplace tensor mutations,module: dynamo,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,185888,"186205, 187890",1,2,failed_ci_checks,PR #187890 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6f201f934c156a00ce41bf182d840d551812f63d8f45ca5f5c620c7341f1fa14
+BUNDLE-167,bundle:bundle-167,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: onnx (1 issue + 2 PRs),pr,186969,Bump onnx to 1.22.0 (stable) and unify typing-extensions to 4.15.0,module: onnx,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,185955,"185989, 186969",1,2,failed_ci_checks,PR #185989 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup. Review signal: @copilot can you rebase and bump to 1.22rc2?,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d8ab0ac966b4cc41f27a3ecb359d9468a144947488717435fff4e56f2dd3c4ee
+BUNDLE-168,bundle:bundle-168,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: aotinductor (1 issue + 2 PRs),pr,186920,Route overrideable SDPA AOTI calls through dispatcher,module: aotinductor,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,184195,"184308, 186920",1,2,failed_ci_checks,PR #186920 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",107f1877b9eb2619882ca657133de3041fee53370a471c2970efd25944ea77d3
+BUNDLE-169,bundle:bundle-169,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: flex attention (1 issue + 2 PRs),pr,186857,Use real flex block counts for autotune inputs,module: flex attention,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,180651,"181096, 186857",1,2,failed_ci_checks,PR #186857 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c10879b03daa2bc405b9d039c73d771f4ac81858abed2ee95a0fec7ddd2f24b4
+BUNDLE-170,bundle:bundle-170,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: complex (1 issue + 2 PRs),pr,183862,[Inductor] Preserve view_as_complex input layout before fake prop,module: complex,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,179368,"179372, 183862",1,2,failed_ci_checks,PR #183862 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",752621325f500e5b855cc535490b2ab4c0f3a0080961706f56845ba87c1784c9
+BUNDLE-171,bundle:bundle-171,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: flop counter (1 issue + 2 PRs),pr,187592,Support registered HOPs in FlopCounterMode,module: flop counter,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,134385,"167224, 187592",1,2,failed_ci_checks,PR #167224 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",09e08d2d21261cd429b364e31dc9ce4c246a74972db6175ad59da27f7fe010df
+BUNDLE-172,bundle:bundle-172,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: docs (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,189317,[doc] Add accelerator test reuse guide (#181474),module: docs,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,181474,189317,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189317 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=BLOCKED; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0886f3d6115a642edabaa952c958a0b001f96bd8da6dba11e08361579d273336
+BUNDLE-173,bundle:bundle-173,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: onnx (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,189313,Support aten::cumprod ONNX export via CumProd (opset 26),module: onnx,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,102948,189313,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #189313 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",99fde458ac3cd1c973070d816a30b4d307cdc92a043883fcee8a482e0a9d92ab
+BUNDLE-174,bundle:bundle-174,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: custom-operators (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,189288,[inductor] Fix compute_ancestors KeyError from self-referential mutation copy,module: custom-operators,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,189271,189288,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189288 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",23fdcc378266d7ee62a30b7b58f8bde20669639156ef9a883f4a6672b1f6d240
+BUNDLE-175,bundle:bundle-175,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: ci (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,189158,Skip GHA stats artifacts from other workflow attempts,module: ci,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,189157,189158,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189158 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",93ae1cff889a1458d17ea944fee58ec30d2da63b92618b7fee13e17628e81205
+BUNDLE-176,bundle:bundle-176,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: fx (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,189142,fx: Fix incorrect return_annotation for tuple types in operator schemas,module: fx,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,189106,189142,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189142 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",80cd40dcbcfe76baabfda69eccea1d2986793a8600c14b720efba388ae04d6d6
+BUNDLE-177,bundle:bundle-177,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: tests (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,189141,"[test] Add opt-in sign-sensitive special-value parity check (copysign, atan2, reciprocal)",module: tests,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,188680,189141,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189141 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=BLOCKED; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d13973d2e472b22493f637ef80462c04a8e5cb613ef3b161f10ef434555a7d83
+BUNDLE-178,bundle:bundle-178,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,189127,[inductor] Decompose broadcast-bias baddbmm before pointwise,module: inductor,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,187093,189127,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189127 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e3ecb752c5e01c52c32661c238eed23f5db57995c93855f24829a5f6a0900991
+BUNDLE-179,bundle:bundle-179,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: ci (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,189119,Fix test-jsons artifact upload path,module: ci,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,189118,189119,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189119 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",23b70823b00272028507ddd2c208b0ef96710ea5e467e40f5b990eae9f0fb2e4
+BUNDLE-180,bundle:bundle-180,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: correctness (silent) (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,189038,[MPS] Fix uint8 casting in MPS `copy_` kernels,module: correctness (silent),Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,160744,189038,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #189038 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f36906dafcc222cae9620bddb888d362e67bb8d14e7a20fe15a8ec80e5ff3dad
+BUNDLE-181,bundle:bundle-181,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,189009,[xpu][fix] Enable test_fallback_kernel_with_symexpr_output on XPU with correct head_dim,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,188131,189009,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #189009 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",33de5f4fee7c93be5b3ef976d529ede44aa7c8c48c019d6eb47cc58e8bf2728a
+BUNDLE-182,bundle:bundle-182,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,188994,[dynamic shapes] Preserve algebraic relationships in foreign unbacked SymInt transfer (#188723),module: dynamic shapes,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,188723,188994,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #188994 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0b5b999677cdc45d496ebda4d9250e8129ae7c9af63692d381dffa5cc4fcd865
+BUNDLE-183,bundle:bundle-183,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: fsdp (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,188990,[FSDP] Fix to_cpu when flat_param is already on CPU,module: fsdp,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,188989,188990,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188990 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e42025286a4742a4109b905ae36b66b05369da4f15e714b0492140f9c5666237
+BUNDLE-184,bundle:bundle-184,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: oncall: distributed (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,188980,Fix inconsistent accelerator guard in checkpoint staging test,oncall: distributed,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,188790,188980,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188980 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=BLOCKED; pending=statusCheckRollup; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a3077bfc7519f94f594487c6b57dee8fd0678b70a8b62b64bcb3aa292491b7a2
+BUNDLE-185,bundle:bundle-185,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: compile ux (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,188913,[inductor] Add triton.cudagraph_max_recorded_sizes to cap dynamic shape re-recording,module: compile ux,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,188150,188913,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #188913 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a4519311fd858daf7083865687afd29db5b7abbe4b8fe2bff86adb97876eb593
+BUNDLE-186,bundle:bundle-186,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,188862,[inductor] Fix bool minimum/maximum crash in index propagation (#188862) (#188862),module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,188230,188862,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188862 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,"reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=BLOCKED; pending=statusCheckRollup, macos-py3-arm64 / test (default, 1, 3, macos-m1-stable), macos-py3-arm64 / test (openreg, 1, 1, macos-m1-stable), macos-py3-arm64 / test (default, 3, 3, macos-m1-stable), macos-py3-arm64 / test (default, 2, 3, macos-m1-stable), unit-test / inductor-test / test (inductor_cpp_wrapper, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), +6 more; stale_days=0",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",592dca8b3c6f4ebfb55819e0c5f2c5f2d225dd578b7290575c70b7deffcf049f
+BUNDLE-187,bundle:bundle-187,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: __torch_function__ (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,188828,Skip conv_transpose3d redispatch test on Windows CI - flaky test,module: __torch_function__,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,188757,188828,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #188828 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8176cb166423cad62e455e44548e6f9308b109f5beb061b34f2fd3427ac23dba
+BUNDLE-188,bundle:bundle-188,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: python array api (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,188795,Fix `torch.asarray` to preserve an input's device when a default device is set,module: python array api,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,150199,188795,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188795 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d4f70cfe88d425e17054f07a6389ea3772f18a0c61eff2a4bb802d7e28c9a216
+BUNDLE-189,bundle:bundle-189,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: correctness (silent) (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,188784,Fix `torch.asarray` for buffer-protocol objects with no dtype,module: correctness (silent),"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,188128,188784,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #188784 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5d7ef3bf1e1a467478607059cd2157d35c3a6962931e9b09f6f9140cfcb58f00
+BUNDLE-190,bundle:bundle-190,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: xpu (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,188783,[xpu][fix]Fix bmm_outer_product override to support XPU tensors,module: xpu,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,188773,188783,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #188783 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7830559724893dbffda460f83558ac2a5a63b660729ca17ee46f2a8ad4362f11
+BUNDLE-191,bundle:bundle-191,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: complex (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,188719,Fix Inductor KeyError on view_as_complex of non-contiguous CUDA tensors,module: complex,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,188718,188719,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188719 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=5,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",635a2bcfb726e79911bd7eb148caf8bea84f4aa28c2e759c99f0fb82ec04ae0f
+BUNDLE-192,bundle:bundle-192,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,188632,Fix Dynamo opaque object staticmethod guards,module: dynamo,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,188544,188632,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188632 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8c3bfa5764f50a450e6989ca84f7932af70ce757ed6497ea5633506a9eb832c9
+BUNDLE-193,bundle:bundle-193,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: nn (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,188327,[test] Add error_inputs for nn.Conv2d module,module: nn,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,174183,188327,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #188327 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6d0f5e8800ee20b28c9e9cde78447603479a371084ab0ffdede55006392b2a93
+BUNDLE-194,bundle:bundle-194,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: autograd (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,188066,test: add F.normalize zero-input correctness tests (fixes #184575),module: autograd,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,184575,188066,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188066 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=3,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",cfb26d36f93bf4c258ee1f92ce18027991918965e3fd7f6e8711297b4e16d4a7
+BUNDLE-195,bundle:bundle-195,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: correctness (silent) (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,188053,test: add svdvals NaN propagation test (fixes #187759),module: correctness (silent),"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,187759,188053,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188053 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4bec300215dc02fc2d95b763613174e3505be11a5f834dce441898b4cd35b8bc
+BUNDLE-196,bundle:bundle-196,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: correctness (silent) (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,188049,Fix Inductor div floor nonfinite CUDA results,module: correctness (silent),"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,188048,188049,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #188049 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",fe033aa039a34916fe1a1d4c00d88452e44359d69de88924c429c841cf507595
+BUNDLE-197,bundle:bundle-197,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: fx (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,187956,Propagate FX subgraph replacement meta values,module: fx,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,187945,187956,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #187956 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",93f87f31ff8c3777fd6cd52c939bc89215297f4af27fa3f7a00d1ac3dbcbb9b2
+BUNDLE-198,bundle:bundle-198,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,187614,Use sym_numel in linalg_cond string overload,module: dynamic shapes,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,186028,187614,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #187614 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b68d14b7f69b7a5a873e4c87c5f15d1ad5c3614a83aba726bfda8e842a73deb1
+BUNDLE-199,bundle:bundle-199,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,187604,Fix fake slice pending unbacked replacements,module: dynamic shapes,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,185185,187604,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #187604 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",79de2e6fae10e977f356d8a967206594e7509741d7710bb638c9b4bff2b9278c
+BUNDLE-200,bundle:bundle-200,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: correctness (silent) (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,187601,[functorch] Fix dynamic layers under inference_mode,module: correctness (silent),"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,177750,187601,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #187601 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d241a7dc793adbc9a8311b0ce1fc3b8e549533cb9804f766a7cb37da8164bea8
+BUNDLE-201,bundle:bundle-201,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,187452,Polyhedral Optimization Pass for PyTorch Inductor (Phase 1),module: inductor,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,187451,187452,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #187452 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b2cb195815e05faafc072cfa6e01672b9e25bc3a7b7ac0cd4b6bd6728bb79e66
+BUNDLE-202,bundle:bundle-202,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: error checking (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,187242,Validate LocalResponseNorm parameters to prevent silent inf output,module: error checking,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,187177,187242,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #187242 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=22,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5bd40c60783d98c40c92be04a2e7ac876ebf9abe49e8b60585ac9be93661beec
+BUNDLE-203,bundle:bundle-203,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: half (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,187171,[inductor] Fix test_comprehensive_addbmm_cpu_float16 precision mismatch (#187170),module: half,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,187170,187171,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #187171 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e095ac92e9f3409cbd35545267008833e6800fd509d3a21482fb8c739512f537
+BUNDLE-204,bundle:bundle-204,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: fsdp (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,187161,[FSDP] Cache post-forward DeviceMesh to avoid duplicate NCCL communicators per layer,module: fsdp,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,187155,187161,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #187161 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",60ded578cf9879a85f54e4ced9197eccba95171b33cbc08c14bb0a9e89d1ffeb
+BUNDLE-205,bundle:bundle-205,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,187057,Fix value-opaque graph output replay,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,187041,187057,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #187057 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b081d9c8b5d6a1929fb103ffbdfefcf929fb177d9dc3b384c0ccf2a909d1d067
+BUNDLE-206,bundle:bundle-206,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: custom-operators (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,187012,Support optional Tensor list schemas,module: custom-operators,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,160094,187012,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #187012 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1be96b7610f7c494be8697353d6e268d6a7f0a84cd03e10d806ad2b9ed995562
+BUNDLE-207,bundle:bundle-207,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: autograd (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186953,Fix CPU amin/amax backward rematerialization mismatch,module: autograd,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,186799,186953,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186953 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d36bded453b82160b5bce3963889501f368bdcc96f46d65a4fc3954795192d83
+BUNDLE-208,bundle:bundle-208,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: oncall: cpu inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186942,[inductor] Round fmod/remainder scalars for bf16/fp16 CPU,oncall: cpu inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,186875,186942,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #186942 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), +1 more.","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), +1 more, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aav...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",71c860d0652137116a4d9033ce468b138824c4ac6265c12d96240f2226882bd1
+BUNDLE-209,bundle:bundle-209,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186923,Graph break on custom op fake tensor failures,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,185141,186923,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186923 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0e67c50edf078c59e623f998bb68345483e1a5f380b2afefd4a6abd794d5c27d
+BUNDLE-210,bundle:bundle-210,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: correctness (silent) (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186913,Fix int64 value_expr arithmetic in Triton codegen,module: correctness (silent),"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,183901,186913,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186913 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1951e02864300123f0276e229282dc88e01e84eabd0dad35d9c21765d42c8fac
+BUNDLE-211,bundle:bundle-211,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: aotdispatch (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186859,Recover fake/proxy views from functional tensor bases,module: aotdispatch,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,181304,186859,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186859 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2278ad740119c560b601115e1ec59b05b447e75d0d9a75234eb8905094fc758a
+BUNDLE-212,bundle:bundle-212,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: autograd (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186845,[make_fx] Decompose detach by default for higher-order grads,module: autograd,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,175477,186845,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186845 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6bbce99a6ed93090266d6b96b1c4964559d5d953a7d2af7428faf3f0ad548ad2
+BUNDLE-213,bundle:bundle-213,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: lint (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186764,fix: Use typing_extensions.TypeAliasType for better reexport of `__module__`,module: lint,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,171905,186764,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #186764 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",af948deae478a5805f98a65b9d4dfea7c6c8c6ebe405e69d0c01560203b52e05
+BUNDLE-214,bundle:bundle-214,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186656,Autotune XBLOCK for mix-order reductions,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,185814,186656,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186656 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b7c5410e0814ee535cabe48e3d1f3e1fc7a6d802b1486929e5f26263648e04ff
+BUNDLE-215,bundle:bundle-215,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: bootcamp (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186561,Preserve autograd metadata for functionalized inplace views,module: bootcamp,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,90507,186561,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186561 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2a67e9d1483569ae7fc1d319877ebbd49515f99f140f7e398450375453de9240
+BUNDLE-216,bundle:bundle-216,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: aotdispatch (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186557,Resolve scalar overloads before AOT compilation,module: aotdispatch,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,90923,186557,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #186557 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g). Review signal: My agent says I rebased the PR, fixed the scalar-le...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",81679ca372cf645b1c09d9406b4020aa3c18520883c11967857f97f2387fabe8
+BUNDLE-217,bundle:bundle-217,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: aotdispatch (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186554,Preserve hooks for dependent AOTAutograd outputs,module: aotdispatch,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,91468,186554,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #186554 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, lf-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, lf-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",94ee0f3718131d54a47058bedce13af5f16ace618a1c6aa6a65c837bd5bacc5c
+BUNDLE-218,bundle:bundle-218,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: minifier (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186529,Preserve grad state in Dynamo minifier repros,module: minifier,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,111414,186529,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186529 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",fa4d1be7b05f1525be9030805f7912765e85900063964fbc33318ee41680d6af
+BUNDLE-219,bundle:bundle-219,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: proxytensor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186522,Trace Tensor.requires_grad_ in pre-dispatch make_fx,module: proxytensor,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,113899,186522,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #186522 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aav...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a0a4a46e71fc4a3f20e2723ad15f48240bbfc6335b0f76a653cb509af579581c
+BUNDLE-220,bundle:bundle-220,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186510,Fix Dynamo low-precision addc opmath,module: dynamo,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,116202,186510,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #186510 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-py3.14t-clang18 / test-osdc (default, 2, 5, mt-l-x86iavx512-16-128), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-py3.14t-clang18 / test-osdc (default, 2, 5, mt-l-x86iavx512-16-128), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-py3.14t-clang18 / test-osdc (default, 2, 5, mt-l-x86iavx512-16-128), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",df9e1d9483fff7b25f3d5f8d10218cd34e96b1909209fcd2fef26200ff6455a7
+BUNDLE-221,bundle:bundle-221,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: aotdispatch (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186506,Register missing CIA decomposition py_impls,module: aotdispatch,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,117555,186506,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186506 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0083cab3447d43d470841fd82d94e5051462dd011e463e92843ad079b781da18
+BUNDLE-222,bundle:bundle-222,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: aotdispatch (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186501,Collapse foreach input mutation copies in AOTAutograd,module: aotdispatch,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,119191,186501,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #186501 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",57511555034d38a66265b8bea93dd616a22aada36a8a7a9fbd72f003a136fab7
+BUNDLE-223,bundle:bundle-223,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: aotdispatch (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186493,Optimize AOTAutograd compiled forward wrapper,module: aotdispatch,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,122029,186493,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186493 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3447aafd625f9001efe6720551748851cd8c98cd6dba3822ad032a0b3edb9c02
+BUNDLE-224,bundle:bundle-224,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: functionalization (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186478,Fix AOTAutograd resized out tensor mutation replay,module: functionalization,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,122386,186478,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186478 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",846d4e887819bd5f1f742fc2840663bec3ab2a5587f757d70b7a00f6da0f192e
+BUNDLE-225,bundle:bundle-225,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: functorch (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186470,Raise user error for joint parameter mutation export,module: functorch,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,122860,186470,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186470 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f5305ff3f815294152a142be702332c276136a10ca9451d28d8a7adbe03e980d
+BUNDLE-226,bundle:bundle-226,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: pt2-dispatcher (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186459,Fix fake view strides for AOT group norm tracing,module: pt2-dispatcher,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,124181,186459,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186459 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2e328d7e608c9d74984c66b44bbd7a23621a6e107ea1d906095fea0f8675ee3a
+BUNDLE-227,bundle:bundle-227,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186457,Fix torch.ops float parsing for scalar tensor args,module: dynamic shapes,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,124344,186457,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186457 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d9d04b8a55ca7333ef0f9bb536f8117605d79d7d13948196e1a73d6dd3442f56
+BUNDLE-228,bundle:bundle-228,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186431,Fix ModuleTracker with Dynamo runtime modules,module: dynamo,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,127112,186431,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186431 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",955f4198aa21bb693ae87b005647c547360ee4ac7292105f6c8a84d6255f06da
+BUNDLE-229,bundle:bundle-229,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186425,Skip Dynamo inside non-traceable subclass dispatch hooks,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,128160,186425,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186425 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ba49b4929125f8eafbdbeeef790c9080c289651f76bbc7a9f8a25afe80a5417e
+BUNDLE-230,bundle:bundle-230,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186388,Avoid native eager router graph breaks under Dynamo,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,186354,186388,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186388 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",10aa21a1c2606c7a3cee97dfcf641543b390e4a23e7b9194644484d83023e669
+BUNDLE-231,bundle:bundle-231,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186248,Simplify Min/Max using ShapeEnv value ranges,module: dynamic shapes,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,137096,186248,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186248 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8e0d6e644c0a14476c26231de6691c640eac4057c9f639fe499897df6b825075
+BUNDLE-232,bundle:bundle-232,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: correctness (silent) (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186246,Fix stale scalar value in addcdiv graph-break decomposition,module: correctness (silent),"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,185382,186246,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186246 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",38634467736919683548a3a1c33ec3de3637e0e945295fd3a3b1013298f2c146
+BUNDLE-233,bundle:bundle-233,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186210,Fix cond branch-local shape assertions,module: dynamic shapes,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,138141,186210,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #186210 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ef1fdce3ccdef57319d7c7fa900cbf8d1390a168c9207ce00bba1904cc08c5c6
+BUNDLE-234,bundle:bundle-234,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: higher order operators (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186201,Deduplicate symbolic cond inputs after export passes,module: higher order operators,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,138229,186201,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186201 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8ded9150645edd02f78b79953028816ae560878100c679d47503c20e8515bbdf
+BUNDLE-235,bundle:bundle-235,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: pt2-dispatcher (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186199,Fix functionalization return mapping for mixed mutable out ops,module: pt2-dispatcher,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,138264,186199,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186199 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a5507dec23b18d4ef95a2ded330f46643dc316b0f186a1a5df559257775795e8
+BUNDLE-236,bundle:bundle-236,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: custom-operators (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186166,Respect fake/functional modes for backend autograd kernels,module: custom-operators,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,139707,186166,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #186166 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-py3.14t-clang18 / test-osdc (default, 5, 5, mt-l-x86iavx512-16-128).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-py3.14t-clang18 / test-osdc (default, 5, 5, mt-l-x86iavx512-16-128), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-py3.14t-clang18 / test-osdc (default, 5, 5, mt-l-x86iavx512-16-128).",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4b81444c19a9f825097ac6d7a7f198bd709cb5c38efef0c929ce099504229f69
+BUNDLE-237,bundle:bundle-237,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: aotdispatch (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186111,Fix stale mutated input history in AOTAutograd,module: aotdispatch,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,140707,186111,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186111 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",16c160142e40ed7d4203f45fc983a7bfb422d9263c6b225a86dc76304f645928
+BUNDLE-238,bundle:bundle-238,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: aotdispatch (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186007,Preserve eager post accumulate hook ordering in AOTAutograd,module: aotdispatch,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,144376,186007,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186007 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1eca68c2b8d17c84eaab66bad6265c6fadecd55cb3659dfc5df5bf17b53339e8
+BUNDLE-239,bundle:bundle-239,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: windows (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185972,Handle malformed MSVC help output,module: windows,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,145383,185972,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185972 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f4f98d3402338d5dcaff3c57cf00c1349d9a7f0140b58739a1b9f5255efb18ae
+BUNDLE-240,bundle:bundle-240,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: benchmark (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185929,Fix Dynamo benchmark model state isolation,module: benchmark,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,145773,185929,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185929 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2fd6533caeda2e1c4bae1da999aa2f7edba683ac27773b6e4ce306d265f290a6
+BUNDLE-241,bundle:bundle-241,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: flex attention (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185916,Fix FlexAttention nested index backward,module: flex attention,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,146896,185916,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185916 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",bbc0131a699c25b4efed1f9e6ba23fcded4a034297069479cf9e12f23414e4c5
+BUNDLE-242,bundle:bundle-242,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: aotdispatch (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185914,Log aot_export fw_metadata instead of printing it,module: aotdispatch,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,147135,185914,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185914 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6378324338d5740e099756347acdff2a0ff6f2e9efb44165e9b33dea5d8ee715
+BUNDLE-243,bundle:bundle-243,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: custom-operators (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185897,Support concrete enum types in torch.library.define schemas,module: custom-operators,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,183957,185897,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185897 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",64608db4bde61c9702d3973ddd6ae25444cccbc10c52707ee46690fdcf18ec31
+BUNDLE-244,bundle:bundle-244,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: bfloat16 (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185878,Fix Inductor expm1 on float subnormal inputs,module: bfloat16,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,185480,185878,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185878 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ca4c526a2f916e01bfaaddcc46f5e685d1a822d348049c14d91ae9493fbbf6c0
+BUNDLE-245,bundle:bundle-245,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: aotdispatch (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185876,Prevent saving mutated grad inputs in AOT min-cut,module: aotdispatch,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,185497,185876,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185876 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6fd253abe9a5e23bca5ddbbc95598c3e11b6a51d5e81a56866608bc3ca0b1c1d
+BUNDLE-246,bundle:bundle-246,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: correctness (silent) (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185873,Preserve mutation renames after scheduler recompute,module: correctness (silent),"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,185509,185873,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185873 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",af43f4077e48deb220587784ea1ba4937f49ac7c007fbaac6312cfbadf3a7b0b
+BUNDLE-247,bundle:bundle-247,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185871,Fix symbolic stride-order sorting without explicit ShapeEnv,module: dynamic shapes,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,185510,185871,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185871 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8). Review signal: My agent says I rebased onto current main and addressed the automated review feedback by making V.graph recovery tolerate poisoned virtualized state while preserving static stride sorting on the plain argsort path.",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",33f8cbe9410aff9404701b2ea62e28564b32600164e3bd6e459e3bef55095eb5
+BUNDLE-248,bundle:bundle-248,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: correctness (silent) (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185866,Fix CPU Inductor numerics for BatchNorm erf normalize,module: correctness (silent),"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,185589,185866,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185866 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), +1 more.","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), +1 more, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aav...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a3557100c319a50fb2b6e89db14268746a9633ff09e4d32e1f476d3a88f3a90d
+BUNDLE-249,bundle:bundle-249,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: aotdispatch (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185861,Fix ViewMeta serialization for special views,module: aotdispatch,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,185630,185861,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185861 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0e6de58b6bcfe3963fa91f2d651e66af1a7f513b24b828ba72b9b518482ec9de
+BUNDLE-250,bundle:bundle-250,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: aotdispatch (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185829,Fix autograd.grad graph breaks under aot_eager,module: aotdispatch,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,145899,185829,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185829 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0e2caf76540de0565ef1621f3d9e9747767270311887a1c2bf3642d0582bab59
+BUNDLE-251,bundle:bundle-251,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: autograd (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185775,Avoid storage access for no-storage tensors in MetaConverter,module: autograd,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,148695,185775,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185775 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aav...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e706613978c61883befd4f739b315f34bac564aad63a28ef0572b204cb2c4a73
+BUNDLE-252,bundle:bundle-252,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: compiled autograd (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185762,[Dynamo] Support _AutoDispatchBelowAutograd context manager,module: compiled autograd,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,149586,185762,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185762 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2179a05573592e8bd112718d04aa3e00cf2c8e962e8f7e7a4e93efeef4a81189
+BUNDLE-253,bundle:bundle-253,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: flex attention (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185759,Improve float32 flex attention backward tiling,module: flex attention,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,149767,185759,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185759 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5183ef0915babe394bfdd1c36c7765b7ac5302b0b635b9d587b834818a4cc693
+BUNDLE-254,bundle:bundle-254,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: docs (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185751,"[nn] Raise ValueError early for invalid (ndim, pad_size) in non-constant F.pad modes",module: docs,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,184845,185751,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185751 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",270f2480889722d94aa567e224a12f147f9c2b1e3f2b5e10803390f7df67a753
+BUNDLE-255,bundle:bundle-255,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185734,Preserve torch._check messages in runtime asserts,module: dynamic shapes,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,150063,185734,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185734 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g). Review signal: My agent says I rebased the PR onto current main and fixed the runtime-assert retrace regression behind the latest Dr. CI failures. Th...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b372100703842bc4da5007d055eadb314ba09d267f8be175b1282d618c308a64
+BUNDLE-256,bundle:bundle-256,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185604,Improve infer_size unbacked broadcast error,module: dynamic shapes,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,152656,185604,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185604 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5dd07c045dd53765ca400a9a685f2f305549f36f2bf3983af127454d70376fb0
+BUNDLE-257,bundle:bundle-257,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: compile ux (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185501,Fix Issue #185396 inductor complex64 triton signature,module: compile ux,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,185396,185501,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185501 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9492942d4604ca6d255f7cee99c486cba042bc23a65b3774bb46e3130a280611
+BUNDLE-258,bundle:bundle-258,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: higher order operators (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185304,Fix while_loop stride metadata preservation,module: higher order operators,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,160939,185304,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185304 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, lf-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, lf-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, lf-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g). Review signal: My agent says I rebased and resubmitted this stack on current main, removed the unsafe global...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f499800d0142df52b12e6a0881205b5a12dd22943dea2c632ba15b0e00b05abb
+BUNDLE-259,bundle:bundle-259,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: cpp (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185231,[C++] Ensure wrapped tensors can be printed,module: cpp,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,185200,185231,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185231 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",725a6ec4e5e59c7f36ce0f12e0c61c999c5996aad3d32136612661b2675fdbed
+BUNDLE-260,bundle:bundle-260,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: autograd (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185054,[autograd] Validate forward-mode jacobian/hessian require vectorize=T…,module: autograd,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,184842,185054,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185054 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",203eeaa67d34fbf77f1e0b81844d263253b542ba89cd07de79c80dd3fa4b3f67
+BUNDLE-261,bundle:bundle-261,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: oncall: pt2 (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185052,Fix Inductor reuse for disjoint strided slices,oncall: pt2,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,167098,185052,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185052 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e15144bf21e3678c9ebae19197f8d923d1497f9535493406e0406acabbe87ff0
+BUNDLE-262,bundle:bundle-262,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: aotdispatch (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184995,Fix AOT getitem replay under inference_mode,module: aotdispatch,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,169477,184995,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #184995 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",29f1243fb69a6ba7ea9b353ea998825f11af64c20f2d84133a94942764af3604
+BUNDLE-263,bundle:bundle-263,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184981,Fix torch._numpy bool numeric subtract,module: dynamo,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,170509,184981,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #184981 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c1daf38c277b6b3ecfed588fe89a036938702805e119dcf451c7b6f8001874aa
+BUNDLE-264,bundle:bundle-264,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: custom-operators (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184944,Make OpaqueBase usable as a pybind base,module: custom-operators,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,172869,184944,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #184944 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f5eaa1f146bde2f88ca42ffbe8157f0f9dd6fefe7d19e0c3dd3ba8c7196ad94c
+BUNDLE-265,bundle:bundle-265,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: pt2-dispatcher (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184938,Fix AOTAutograd forward output overwritten by backward mutation,module: pt2-dispatcher,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,172956,184938,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #184938 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f4d35ad213cbf215bd5c345b148adfc71ccffc0107fc758880df0287d54e4d3d
+BUNDLE-266,bundle:bundle-266,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: decompositions (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184928,Fix linalg_pinv tensor tolerance broadcasting,module: decompositions,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,173052,184928,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #184928 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c82698a2c0ff77d10cb254ec348ef74a7ea2576967f82a220eec297cae490cd3
+BUNDLE-267,bundle:bundle-267,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184920,[dynamo] Store FunctionIdSet entries by identity weakrefs,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,173578,184920,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #184920 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18 / test-osdc (dynamo_wrapped, 3, 3, mt-l-x86iavx512-8-64), linux-jammy-py3.14t-clang18 / test-osdc (dynamo_wrapped, 3, 3, mt-l-x86iavx512-16-128), linux-jammy-py3.14-clang18 / test-osdc (dynamo_wrapped, 2, 3, mt-l-x86iavx512-8-64), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), +3 more.","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18 / test-osdc (dynamo_wrapped, 3, 3, mt-l-x86iavx512-8-64), linux-jammy-py3.14t-clang18 / test-osdc (dynamo_wrapped, 3, 3, mt-l-x86iavx512-16-128), linux-jammy-py3.14-clang18 / test-osdc (dynamo_wrapped, 2, 3, mt-l-x86iavx512-8-64), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), +3 more, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18 / test-osdc (dynamo_wrapped, 3, 3, mt-l-x86iavx512-8-64), linux-jammy-py3.14t-clang18 / test-osdc (dynamo_wrapped, 3, 3, mt-l-x86iavx512-16-128), linux-jammy-py3.14-clang18 / test-osdc (dynamo_wrapped, 2, 3, mt-l-x86iavx512-8-64), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, m...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",fd86c1e4c7d9abc5ec551b9472d2cecbc7db537c5a5553305af13ad0b63bba36
+BUNDLE-268,bundle:bundle-268,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184917,Make FX traceback preserve state thread-local,module: dynamo,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,173816,184917,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #184917 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",cacc62e0e82241a890ac31540ce963ac3892dcebdcc6c84274be1438f270f5c0
+BUNDLE-269,bundle:bundle-269,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: functionalization (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184910,Reject direct aten.set in Dynamo,module: functionalization,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,174176,184910,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #184910 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18 / test-osdc (crossref, 1, 2, mt-l-x86iavx512-8-64).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18 / test-osdc (crossref, 1, 2, mt-l-x86iavx512-8-64), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18 / test-osdc (crossref, 1, 2, mt-l-x86ia...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",fc25fcafc069cee7c19a11c8b5c38a57ea732084384abc305f1a8933ca4ddd89
+BUNDLE-270,bundle:bundle-270,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: functionalization (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184864,Error on overlapping as_strided mutations in compile,module: functionalization,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,174371,184864,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #184864 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9252f16cc570f06d66be486b0d0d3bf29a9912f36eb2ed56736990514b94f755
+BUNDLE-271,bundle:bundle-271,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184838,Fix Dynamo raw descriptor building,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,175264,184838,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #184838 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0015ce7b6b81261aced8b1041503c86d2bfe26f69433d636321efc7128bc2cdb
+BUNDLE-272,bundle:bundle-272,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184830,[Dynamo] Guard source-backed identity comparisons,module: dynamo,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,175267,184830,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #184830 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",226abb6faee0878395faff819f2e446813d3ecebd76759417b70296296be4fa1
+BUNDLE-273,bundle:bundle-273,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184820,[dynamo] respect custom metaclass __call__ during class construction,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,175292,184820,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #184820 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0697ae026d2555fed8c5aa2bf7bb406b6dd51942a44761de8eb8e2575a902357
+BUNDLE-274,bundle:bundle-274,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: custom-operators (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184809,Improve custom op Tensor subclass fake error,module: custom-operators,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,175408,184809,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #184809 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",35e91c8e601f134c6a132fbecb48eda0e601fd37d1bac80938483b7b00d242be
+BUNDLE-275,bundle:bundle-275,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: compile ux (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184803,[dynamo] Avoid key-set guard for dict setitem,module: compile ux,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,175858,184803,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #184803 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",595f1dd7d3bd8747df3fa661cee3c3a1a06479af4158b11c2884813346655426
+BUNDLE-276,bundle:bundle-276,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184793,Fix no-tensor-aliasing recompile reason for stale sources,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,176211,184793,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #184793 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",822432104818da5aedc496f2fa9b24f44aa6a89a939454107a9ec59b9b2c6cdf
+BUNDLE-277,bundle:bundle-277,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184747,Remove no-op SDPA masks before backend dispatch,module: dynamo,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,177712,184747,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #184747 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8e6e9341989d9d4f70754b9106d939abd245aa65e7f9a6d38c5e255bfcbd507f
+BUNDLE-278,bundle:bundle-278,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: convolution (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184716,Fix conv_transpose2d meta output padding validation,module: convolution,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,178127,184716,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #184716 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",20a3fd1fc23e6fb4a632ecc0d85f0ec388a85e782db32c975fe901f98fc26388
+BUNDLE-279,bundle:bundle-279,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184713,Support Dynamo class setattr for hook handles,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,178248,184713,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #184713 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c90dab6e069724a41d8aa95a2cc8b7e097ad1b3f43f0bfcd26c7d1ed123df7e4
+BUNDLE-280,bundle:bundle-280,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184709,Fix Dynamo tensor subclass constructor side effects,module: dynamo,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,178388,184709,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #184709 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e6f5f01effb7e0e35bfa40a0cc34a66dee39aed9966a8360883c6bed7575f8b5
+BUNDLE-281,bundle:bundle-281,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: correctness (silent) (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184695,Fix all-masked TransformerEncoder compile consistency,module: correctness (silent),"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,178677,184695,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #184695 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",730e937ebcacc87698284db009564f55b68ea041cd4a52e076231c0c7c7728f8
+BUNDLE-282,bundle:bundle-282,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: aotdispatch (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184656,Fix CPU SDPA higher-order grad compile,module: aotdispatch,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,181177,184656,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #184656 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18 / test-osdc (einops, 1, 1, mt-l-x86iavx512-8-64), linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18 / test-osdc (default, 1, 5, mt-l-x86iavx512-16-128), linux-noble-xpu-n-py3.10 / build-osdc, linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18-asan / build-osdc, linux-jammy-py3.10-gcc11 / build-osdc, +8 more.","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18 / test-osdc (einops, 1, 1, mt-l-x86iavx512-8-64), linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18 / test-osdc (default, 1, 5, mt-l-x86iavx512-16-128), linux-noble-xpu-n-py3.10 / build-osdc, linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18-asan / build-osdc, linux-jammy-py3.10-gcc11 / build-osdc, +8 more, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18 / test-osdc (einops, 1, 1, mt-l-x86iavx512-8-64), linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18 / test-osdc (default, 1, 5, mt-l-x86iavx512-16-128), linux-noble-xpu-n-py3.10 / build-osdc, linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18-asan / build-osdc, linux-jammy-py3.10-gcc11 / build-osdc, +8 more.",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",71246d4cd3287791e9baf27d0f772085e7eead012e306d2de9836f2ba7eb9c7a
+BUNDLE-283,bundle:bundle-283,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184602,Preserve frozen ShapeEnv during fake tensor guards,module: dynamic shapes,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,182940,184602,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #184602 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",40488fee09e79c0183c583eefbc3b2d49eec924394d774080641fadb18ff7d50
+BUNDLE-284,bundle:bundle-284,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: functorch (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184595,Allow functorch grad fake propagation in Dynamo,module: functorch,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,183015,184595,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #184595 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6300fa07441d49a1bb84c41cc72b9fa87b6197345e834c46ca5225ddc44b529d
+BUNDLE-285,bundle:bundle-285,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184590,Fix uncached NestedTensor seqlens under compile,module: dynamic shapes,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,183266,184590,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #184590 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",26795979a3d835e40a421e01a4461c49518d40d0e9a00aa3c657029e58a74fdb
+BUNDLE-286,bundle:bundle-286,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: cudnn (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184573,Fix compile support for CTC loss tensor lengths,module: cudnn,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,183396,184573,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #184573 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2b7fcfea3bb153201ca4ba5579f5fe4049c4af6093b4cfb871764663d2da3e90
+BUNDLE-287,bundle:bundle-287,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: aotdispatch (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184367,Fix AotAutograd aliased-output replay for traceable wrapper subclasses,module: aotdispatch,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,184002,184367,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #184367 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",bb3960ea5bc53f4a73d054dfd01627c693245c3a2706fc2ca9fd758f518b7aa4
+BUNDLE-288,bundle:bundle-288,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: cpp (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184336,fix RPATH in libtorch extraction from wheel,module: cpp,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,183971,184336,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #184336 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c49c3dba03f38e5f226f2ff2e2db31bcda0a2f8aa4e72e3da384f9a404b34979
+BUNDLE-289,bundle:bundle-289,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184256,[inductor] Cap reduction XBLOCK to max block,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,138301,184256,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #184256 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8511e984cb67d0ff1f09a81faa4ad02e3d9c5dd7f23e44e0e89b80fbbc10d200
+BUNDLE-290,bundle:bundle-290,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184130,Avoid torch imports in Inductor compile sidecar,module: inductor,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,148651,184130,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #184130 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d0fdf61e39696c641be53e2bb0a6177bb259f800959a2512690a33f5f7e926dd
+BUNDLE-291,bundle:bundle-291,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184124,Fix Inductor multi-output replacement insertion order,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,148751,184124,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #184124 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integra...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",be7c20df08db9b8f34558afbe782fcedd9f1cf7957353174203a93ee7bae4171
+BUNDLE-292,bundle:bundle-292,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184109,Fix Inductor replacement patterns across view-to-reshape,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,151649,184109,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #184109 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d8a403023393f0fc4c2d3be104bc9a5a721a31b9d81b1751eed4c4ea7a417b48
+BUNDLE-293,bundle:bundle-293,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: docs (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184094,Clone aliased mm/addmm inputs on CPU to avoid in-place gemm,module: docs,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,85852,184094,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #184094 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3fec6ff940e87f3a0659d310d8c1ebf8262a27d3322e07d4dabab9f0f75b8fe8
+BUNDLE-294,bundle:bundle-294,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184092,Skip tiny cudagraph partitions in max-autotune,module: inductor,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,154301,184092,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #184092 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8). Review signal: My agent says I rebased and resubmitted the PR onto current main to refresh CI after the ROCm failures. The failed jobs were in ROCm flash-attention/flop-counter and distributed timeout paths, not this Inductor/Dynamo... | My agent says I rebased and resubmit...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4ba691ae0734eee167e89117a1c7bad0a443be2339bf308944253807e73bdb0d
+BUNDLE-295,bundle:bundle-295,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: cuda graphs (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184091,Handle cudagraph liveness changes during replay,module: cuda graphs,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,154306,184091,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #184091 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3691aff4a6c346208da79cb04faedecb97778db5386e66c24c30dd25f4052780
+BUNDLE-296,bundle:bundle-296,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: fx (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184059,Fix split reduction kernel metadata,module: fx,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,160124,184059,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #184059 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e3775f02d04713a790d3dc79517772192a333f3fdb410d72c6ce3917e2a1523f
+BUNDLE-297,bundle:bundle-297,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184048,Enable Inductor OpInfo CPU coverage,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,161132,184048,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #184048 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8f62282c8cfeeae27cbc1b8bf1289faf78bd7aaedd9333961cfb96580ae4919a
+BUNDLE-298,bundle:bundle-298,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184015,[inductor] Handle scalar workaround args in pattern checks,module: inductor,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,166604,184015,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #184015 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",aead498883973b2fc79adc9eef0c964cd5d1876a3a199cd340c517a3eb925714
+BUNDLE-299,bundle:bundle-299,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184009,Handle SymPy boolean Inductor graph inputs,module: dynamic shapes,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,167070,184009,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #184009 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",790fe824e41c2fa7c4c774979b0eccd8e5039452e387fd18387fa9d061b866e1
+BUNDLE-300,bundle:bundle-300,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184007,[inductor] Clear stale subprocess cache env vars,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,167725,184007,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #184007 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3b6ad22a736825d9be25c2575b902532b5c416ab198b3ba0bfb5b56afffd5836
+BUNDLE-301,bundle:bundle-301,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: cuda graphs (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,183994,Specialize numpy scalar module attrs,module: cuda graphs,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,172942,183994,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #183994 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",955742c35c765a437066ab3527e5bb7a8923894080f7d7b49eca942b14cd21ad
+BUNDLE-302,bundle:bundle-302,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,183969,Fix CSE across unrelated mutation regions,module: inductor,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,174472,183969,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #183969 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",38cb0b6aa697e7ea302455190750ff5d7df907954ca4aa5f0d617a2e1c007fdf
+BUNDLE-303,bundle:bundle-303,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,183958,Enable SDPA constraint cache by default,module: inductor,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,175833,183958,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #183958 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0f5b302d32e9e713d55e00dd6a6ffae3fbf2572a279167b7663ffb91245c05fc
+BUNDLE-304,bundle:bundle-304,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: custom-operators (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,183954,Disallow mid-trace reference opaque creation,module: custom-operators,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,175968,183954,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #183954 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8). Review signal: My agent says I rebased the PR onto current main to restart CI after the prior ambient/broken-trunk and cancelled failures. Local targeted opaque-object and leaf-function tests plus lintrunner -a passed on the rebased... | My agent says I rebased the PR onto...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f3a0f413dcae43cffb0eeddb0542d3e1fdd53942a4077f10b3bd05d8e6012df1
+BUNDLE-305,bundle:bundle-305,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,183904,Fix CPU addcmul tensor-value decomposition numerics,module: inductor,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,176929,183904,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #183904 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5102ef3c5843a71754c208aec9767b9c6a56f0c16869e89af3527bc6b6146138
+BUNDLE-306,bundle:bundle-306,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: arm (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,183879,[inductor][cpu] Enable int8 WOQ GEMM template on Arm,module: arm,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,177327,183879,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #183879 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a6e1d07dd2b85fc5608d3f3fbf47f805b09d223367f9d196e04f9c47d8595dd9
+BUNDLE-307,bundle:bundle-307,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,183871,[inductor] Match eval BatchNorm CUDA numerics,module: inductor,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,178096,183871,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #183871 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8). Review signal: My agent says I rebased the PR onto current main and expanded the commit description to make the TF32 residual gap explicit. The issue already has the matching note: the original TF32-on script can still show a convol...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d8503d4f47afc5eab35d5418bef82d3876034849c9953f9da81c462fafca417f
+BUNDLE-308,bundle:bundle-308,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,183866,Preserve native matmul lowp output precision,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,178317,183866,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #183866 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-cuda13.0-py3.10-gcc11-sm90 / test-osdc (smoke, 1, 1, mt-l-x86iamx-22-225-h100), linux-jammy-cuda13.0-py3.10-gcc11-sm100 / test-osdc (smoke_b200, 1, 1, mt-l-x86iamx-22-225-b200), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), linux-jammy-cuda13.0-py3.10-gcc11-sm100 / test (smoke_b200, 1, 1, linux.dgx.b200), +1 more.","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-cuda13.0-py3.10-gcc11-sm90 / test-osdc (smoke, 1, 1, mt-l-x86iamx-22-225-h100), linux-jammy-cuda13.0-py3.10-gcc11-sm100 / test-osdc (smoke_b200, 1, 1, mt-l-x86iamx-22-225-b200), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), linux-jammy-cuda13.0-py3.10-gcc11-sm100 / test (smoke_b200, 1, 1, linux.dgx.b200), +1 more, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-cuda13.0-py3.10-gcc11-sm90 / test-osdc (smoke, 1, 1, mt-l-x86iamx-22-225-h100), linux-jammy-cuda13.0-py3.10-gcc11-sm100 / test-osdc (smoke_b200, 1, 1, mt-l-x86iamx-22-225-b200), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f7b6af4b248d63159b2e25ea872a6aef7d807ee8b178e3ee4e2db251aaa2c09f
+BUNDLE-309,bundle:bundle-309,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: arm (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,183744,Update ACL dependencies for BF16 inner product,module: arm,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,180447,183744,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #183744 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-py3.14t-clang18 / test (crossref, 2, 2, linux.2xlarge), linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18 / test (crossref, 2, 2, linux.2xlarge), linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18 / test (dynamo_wrapped, 3, 3, linux.2xlarge), linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18 / test (onnx, 1, 1, linux.4xlarge), linux-jammy-py3.14-clang18 / test (crossref, 2, 2, linux.2xlarge), +3 more.","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-py3.14t-clang18 / test (crossref, 2, 2, linux.2xlarge), linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18 / test (crossref, 2, 2, linux.2xlarge), linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18 / test (dynamo_wrapped, 3, 3, linux.2xlarge), linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18 / test (onnx, 1, 1, linux.4xlarge), linux-jammy-py3.14-clang18 / test (crossref, 2, 2, linux.2xlarge), +3 more, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-py3.14t-clang18 / test (crossref, 2, 2, linux.2xlarge), linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18 / test (crossref, 2, 2, linux.2xlarge), linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18 / test (dynamo_wrapped, 3, 3, linux.2xlarge), linux-jammy-py3.10-clang18 / test (onnx, 1, 1, linux.4xlarge), linux-jammy-py3.14-clang18 / test (crossref, 2, 2, linux.2xlarge), +3 more. Review signal: @pytorchbot rebase |...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",cd6973b5e727456710873f657d793dce699b2aa65a998265fd108b169df1e1aa
+BUNDLE-310,bundle:bundle-310,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: correctness (silent) (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,183731,[inductor] Validate fallback output dtype metadata,module: correctness (silent),"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,180807,183731,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #183731 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a5e67e8970441064b90e0c88a741610c98907d6c704e1c2333224596910bf79e
+BUNDLE-311,bundle:bundle-311,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,183652,Fix dynamic slice lowering for generic views,module: dynamic shapes,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,183259,183652,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #183652 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a090604d3db5082b3683bc6df0e542658d1a1e51acc677026cf6364b15527bd1
+BUNDLE-312,bundle:bundle-312,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: correctness (silent) (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,183628,Fix fractional max pool RNG in Inductor,module: correctness (silent),"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,183249,183628,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #183628 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0d4f98d270f2e429dcbd7341080f3c17195c0caf9b401639547b5a080262fc2a
+BUNDLE-313,bundle:bundle-313,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,182972,added graph break on exception based on if user code would catch it,module: dynamo,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,175608,182972,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #182972 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ff332b74d3e006690f95716866600af70c3ec6c1b8e7dcd3037c0854b10b236f
+BUNDLE-314,bundle:bundle-314,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: c10d (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,182273,[c10d] Fix device_id not propagated through ProcessGroupWrapper,module: c10d,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,178977,182273,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #182273 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",fe7ef9fdb4d93e7b101b245103c7d6d5b1040e026a9fb6961139b736729adfba
+BUNDLE-315,bundle:bundle-315,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: openreg (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,181860,[c10] Add InlineEventBase to unify event APIs in DeviceGuardImplInter…,module: openreg,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,163836,181860,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #181860 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8794fec5f0e647a43677e66e42f38afd23e7b2a81dc54069e5bce2c7e1e09236
+BUNDLE-316,bundle:bundle-316,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: docs (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,181823,Docs: update torch.multinomial num_samples requirement note for bette…,module: docs,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,181347,181823,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #181823 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",890f620f75401338e331a3f6ab55dfaab747fa59366761504f17b7097b0cdd3e
+BUNDLE-317,bundle:bundle-317,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: mps (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,180353,[MPS] Replace isin MPSGraph implementation with native Metal kernels,module: mps,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,180833,180353,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #180353 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=7,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b165d3e1e5ff5237929155598f54f61313f1c3b3a0396c27f8d86985a725b3ec
+BUNDLE-318,bundle:bundle-318,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: correctness (silent) (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,178298,torch.linalg.solve_triangular: support for eligible non-dense args,module: correctness (silent),"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,178379,178298,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #178298 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5531b8efaccd09e34ea0803c6dffe6d47983cf9def69d225234af12aedd4ffbd
+BUNDLE-319,bundle:bundle-319,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: fsdp (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,172074,Fixes grad_dtype property being lost in fsdp,module: fsdp,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,170648,172074,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #172074 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",60d18eac6a3c1de745f72b0e9f84e621883ee41a7ac99bbc1d551b5879f1c19b
+BUNDLE-320,bundle:bundle-320,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: lint (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,189319,Enable flake8-bugbear B007 (unused loop control variable),module: lint,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,106571,189319,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189319 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=BLOCKED; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",277f1abbe77ec55ae8feafd9524b11c3696d82df15eca93966cdae0f9997bb38
+BUNDLE-321,bundle:bundle-321,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: oncall: pt2 (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186549,Fix fake deepcopy for custom module mappings,oncall: pt2,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,97078,186549,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186549 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",eb0f7cfc563bfd84f202a1253f5bfe33fe71426c32aafa44cdf2cb2ef30246f1
+BUNDLE-322,bundle:bundle-322,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186512,[dynamo] Graph break on shape-changing Parameter.data assignment,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,115484,186512,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186512 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b3cd22d10f6fc8113db15948432beb34539543a12e2b4220dfa5d3d3fba446c6
+BUNDLE-323,bundle:bundle-323,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: binaries (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185813,[ROCm][Windows] Audit license-files: explicit enumeration + audit test (#183434),module: binaries,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,183434,185813,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185813 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",601fdf2e0105ac5bf029fedb0ed15b9ed4815eb695cb71247e63c3aa68c5ff18
+BUNDLE-324,bundle:bundle-324,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184178,Fix masked Triton conv load pointers,module: inductor,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,143412,184178,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #184178 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0b229d82d44dd09a2b7c077f952b2136789f422643bc82775a9ca5838ef8a737
+BUNDLE-325,bundle:bundle-325,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: memory usage (1 issue + 18 PRs),pr,187458,[MPS] Fuse cross_entropy into a native Metal kernel,module: memory usage,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,187455,"182109, 182731, 182736, 182749, 182791, 183688, 187456, 187457, 187458, 187553, 187556, 187557, 187559, 187787, 187976, 188156, 188333, 189146",1,18,failed_ci_checks,PR #187458 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",cd38522be27b1e2fc481e4850e0c932100bbdbb91574b8fcda21bf0b713ab066
+BUNDLE-326,bundle:bundle-326,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: loss (12 issues + 1 PR),pr,119977,[NJT] Factory function support,module: loss,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"88137, 89124, 89125, 99142, 108567, 112398, 112509, 114090, 115978, 118107, 130538, 132212",119977,12,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #119977 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=65,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5c853872b004f8bd75fadad5780866601a3caec09db0b2538f33d0da57c3d68b
+BUNDLE-327,bundle:bundle-327,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: convolution (7 issues + 1 PR),pr,184193,Preserve FX graph cache guard provenance,module: convolution,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"13716, 18631, 70954, 73764, 75747, 95604, 187473",184193,7,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #184193 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-rocm-py3.10-mi350 / test (distributed, 2, 3, amd-do-linux.rocm.gpu.gfx950.2), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), +2 more.","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-rocm-py3.10-mi350 / test (distributed, 2, 3, amd-do-linux.rocm.gpu.gfx950.2), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), +2 more, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-rocm-py3.10-mi350 / test (distributed, 2, 3, amd-do-linux.rocm.gpu.gfx950.2), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",bb49dc90bc86ec7f46ac2e5fcfe172d36003314de920834bf452bc4529510c91
+BUNDLE-328,bundle:bundle-328,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (2 issues + 6 PRs),pr,185057,Support torch.cuda.use_mem_pool in compile,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"162859, 167026","185057, 188755, 189123, 189173, 189175, 189230",2,6,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185057 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (i...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",87f0ec6c8389fb39e4385a808b6363dbd8fdb192bfe6960c5dcea15bcf582e72
+BUNDLE-329,bundle:bundle-329,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: build (5 issues + 2 PRs),pr,188999,Add RISC-V CPU pause hint to cpu_atomic_add_float spin loop,module: build,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"129553, 141550, 147513, 171659, 180975","181109, 188999",5,2,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188999 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",67bd0d3437910263f0237f376efeaa9686908da054783e76c628cdb61e34c0df
+BUNDLE-330,bundle:bundle-330,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: logging (1 issue + 5 PRs),pr,179550,Enable eager tests for inductor-unittest - Enable TestViewOps and TestDevicePrecision on Intel GPU,module: logging,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,188987,"176688, 176689, 178849, 179549, 179550",1,5,failed_ci_checks,PR #179550 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e9d04981b1d0fdbb7b9ac2d464b31a40f16148ced1b4f355691ff332e5f3d16f
+BUNDLE-331,bundle:bundle-331,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (4 issues + 1 PR),pr,184185,Use memory stats for persistent reductions,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"139908, 141265, 141916, 142250",184185,4,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #184185 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-py3.14-clang18 / test-osdc (crossref, 2, 2, mt-l-x86iavx512-8-64).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-py3.14-clang18 / test-osdc (crossref, 2, 2, mt-l-x86iavx512-8-64), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-py3.14-clang18 / test-osdc (crossref, 2, 2, mt-l-x86iavx512-8-64). Review signal: My agent says I refreshed the PR by rebasing it onto current main after the rerun still reported an unclassified inductor_huggingface failure in eager DebertaV2 import before Inductor compilation. The rebased branch h...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",bbdaa2d965370b3a4bde5ab834025c3334eeefad180acdaf29734c8f0a3d809c
+BUNDLE-332,bundle:bundle-332,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: special (4 issues + 1 PR),pr,183328,[special] Add arbitrary-order modified Bessel functions,module: special,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"76324, 78065, 80152, 80157",183328,4,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #183328 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=BLOCKED; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d193c1276d04c1034163fa2d17b485f982c5986584edf37f314ddab667d9bebc
+BUNDLE-333,bundle:bundle-333,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: aotinductor (1 issue + 4 PRs),pr,184531,[Inductor] Tolerance increase for test_bmm_large_batch_dynamic_cuda,module: aotinductor,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,188670,"169694, 183691, 184531, 187050",1,4,failed_ci_checks,PR #184531 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",593925eb1c9a71032e67621cdb7a4fa8e98131e13ae0d12d74187397d6d8f75d
+BUNDLE-334,bundle:bundle-334,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: ci (3 issues + 1 PR),pr,188720,[ROCm] Enable cholesky_ex via hipSOLVER xgeev (ROCm >= 7.14),module: ci,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"181647, 181648, 181649",188720,3,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #188720 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4160f1b7cf65c8c960ff2ad558bc1dc886a8e266a1b9916501af27ce2357f07e
+BUNDLE-335,bundle:bundle-335,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamic shapes (2 issues + 2 PRs),pr,187589,Make FX symbolic tracing state thread-local,module: dynamic shapes,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"126024, 168042","168999, 187589",2,2,failed_ci_checks,PR #187589 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",09ea9b08f5b2d60dfa8eb92ba2696cef506b8a7a931734148ca6f78a1a099d3b
+BUNDLE-336,bundle:bundle-336,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: tests (1 issue + 3 PRs),pr,184356,[4/N][Test] Migrate TestFwdGradients device-agnostic skips to `@skipOps`,module: tests,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,177259,"184355, 184356, 184678",1,3,failed_ci_checks,PR #184356 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8b6bd36fac8c93a8a11b1d9d0749c3d0c001b7e0cff2369ba1746049bfd13964
+BUNDLE-337,bundle:bundle-337,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (1 issue + 3 PRs),pr,183278,[Inductor][Refactor] 4/N Move reduction heuristics from triton_heuristics.py into triton_codegen/,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,178153,"183276, 183277, 183278",1,3,failed_ci_checks,PR #183277 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c15e2a94e68219015513a2fd937c8ae36ee50cd44b00b99fb8de2f0954a35605
+BUNDLE-338,bundle:bundle-338,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: cpp (1 issue + 3 PRs),pr,186854,Simplify endianness check using std::endian,module: cpp,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,176662,"179286, 186854, 188440",1,3,failed_ci_checks,PR #188440 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",47c8ea3579a67aa8385778701132f460f5b7dbe09e14cd3fc741036e4849a96b
+BUNDLE-339,bundle:bundle-339,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: error checking (1 issue + 3 PRs),pr,174025,Add test for CosineAnnealingLR when T_max = 0,module: error checking,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,177833,"168223, 169107, 174025",1,3,failed_ci_checks,PR #174025 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",02f773003515db0fb7a446453d595156c7cf916a060a115977f041015b391c2b
+BUNDLE-340,bundle:bundle-340,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: arm (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,186245,[1/N] Optimize PyTorch CUDA build with LLVM BOLT,module: arm,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"188602, 189078",186245,2,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186245 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",aa69eebbfcb4fadf730977f98a6bdae805014bc75811c9b9d143d177172ac4cb
+BUNDLE-341,bundle:bundle-341,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: edge cases (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,185790,Fix torch.nn.functional.gelu returning NaN for infinite inputs,module: edge cases,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"185770, 187293",185790,2,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185790 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=22,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5019511468163244d76e6a69182aff989967068909bc529f1db1d5242f40339e
+BUNDLE-342,bundle:bundle-342,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: advanced indexing (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,184987,Fix index_select refs bounds semantics,module: advanced indexing,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"169779, 187463",184987,2,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #184987 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",05902a514623e251b15e56e4a74249ba9d0f0d26cb85e67737d6f6d1fd47454b
+BUNDLE-343,bundle:bundle-343,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: memory format (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,182712,[MPS] Enhance Linear tensor ops to avoid unnecessary .contiguous() calls on weight tensor,module: memory format,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"181946, 183758",182712,2,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #182712 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=29,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c46f9a044aca032f0c397e7ee0289a7385451f9f804885b405562f19ef68b7c2
+BUNDLE-344,bundle:bundle-344,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: openreg (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,165837,[OpenReg][Random] Enrich OpenReg random number generator module implementation add focused documentation,module: openreg,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"158917, 172318",165837,2,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #165837 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8e07de6fb31e035bd301f347022bf39b992912a8a1b4a5897146b20b4d53f980
+BUNDLE-345,bundle:bundle-345,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,189162,[inductor] Use non-NaN-propagating fmax in softmax persistent reduction,module: inductor,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,189161,189162,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189162 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",749b2ba3b846840a302e0a0f33decf59e81277634127531f4c00e14e0c1cb00b
+BUNDLE-346,bundle:bundle-346,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: binaries (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,188951,Add ROCm Docker release images,module: binaries,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,188319,188951,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188951 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7e6d1d4d019e8db4e88fb12072d1f964936de8798106eaa33a7dc5ea98d0bba5
+BUNDLE-347,bundle:bundle-347,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,188681,"[Inductor] Use CUDA toolkit's libdevice by default, fallback to Triton's bundled if not found",module: inductor,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,188672,188681,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188681 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",eb4b0d72e88b89a1dc8c7e1b7a2dccc8fde55f3ce74faef326fb508806d65763
+BUNDLE-348,bundle:bundle-348,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: pipelining (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,188500,Allow pre-split pipeline microbatches,module: pipelining,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,188727,188500,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188500 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=3,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f22bc1dcecd27902a381a9b872908a9972d50c51bb2952aefee629bfbad4aec8
+BUNDLE-349,bundle:bundle-349,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: build (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,188263,(fix) NNPACK PeachPy air gapped build,module: build,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,188652,188263,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188263 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=12,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b2e736000448ee6d60026b297520f7be4bc147e268f5dd05ee427310c31dfd0e
+BUNDLE-350,bundle:bundle-350,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: dataloader (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,187696,Add DataLoader worker signal message affixes,module: dataloader,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,188020,187696,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #187696 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=15,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8a6b1cd07a11218e7550735516a78a37a117785fdabcc0811f7f843ef16faf11
+BUNDLE-351,bundle:bundle-351,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,187328,Add fusion provenance to profiler timelines,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,189270,187328,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #187328 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2652a7668ea6a08d5b098cce741adc5d315c81f6eb7728d9ce3119420ee24f9c
+BUNDLE-352,bundle:bundle-352,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: compile ux (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186965,[RFC][dynamo] Add ContextVar.get() tracing support (Phase 1),module: compile ux,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,186449,186965,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #186965 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7965a6b80c87f2f3079225140afc961ca17910ac93bda93c71ba1111678994d6
+BUNDLE-353,bundle:bundle-353,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: ci (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186835,[RFC]: Auto-select and run Operator Performance Benchmarks from PR Diffs,module: ci,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,186837,186835,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186835 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2d2c2e4300e6f9987f41fe2f0d088f5d2f9c3ad9434b602e8a528e64fb2fffde
+BUNDLE-354,bundle:bundle-354,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: binaries (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186209,Unify triton-xpu CD nightly build into 'triton' package with version suffix,module: binaries,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,186350,186209,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186209 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d590fb48066eabbfcbce4f3b90f06d5928330d6424d84528502eecd449834889
+BUNDLE-355,bundle:bundle-355,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: backend (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185486,[OpenReg] Add minimal implementation for inductor integration in openreg,module: backend,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,181093,185486,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185486 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",76dd93f4e45df6b0170132444c5dfa4ac60a18cfd22f0244ea22c5a4906a1dfd
+BUNDLE-356,bundle:bundle-356,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: xnnpack (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,183487,Update XNNPACK submodule to 0b66c9f,module: xnnpack,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,183795,183487,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #183487 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e82fb3d8ce33588ec024ab291c5ab42db68fa08c8e38182bcff02fa693016863
+BUNDLE-357,bundle:bundle-357,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: correctness (silent) (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,182376,[CUDA][CPU] Unify CPU/GPU relu/max behavior,module: correctness (silent),"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,181801,182376,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #182376 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8e261f521ccec1fa63ac33239fb16a74d781da1276b1915e77e73cafa3afa080
+BUNDLE-358,bundle:bundle-358,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: ci (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,180208,Update slow tests,module: ci,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,187183,180208,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #180208 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c5478bfb8258aa2c6bc8b23556ee60dcfb91ba037adeba69af352d3d13c92ca1
+BUNDLE-359,bundle:bundle-359,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: cuda (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,180020,Add a debug tool to warn on NULL stream use,module: cuda,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,167885,180020,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #180020 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",faca667fc7a37685ac0b6324eb1e46493ae710e4bc97809467c23fbc7083fd34
+BUNDLE-360,bundle:bundle-360,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: ci (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,176678,[CI][Windows] Add NVIDIA RTX workflow,module: ci,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,170753,176678,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #176678 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7bf95ee71c50492d97348fa63bc6f10df32a6aa3cb4a5da7ef1caf28c88e0ad0
+BUNDLE-361,bundle:bundle-361,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: memory usage (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,176317,[MPS] Leveraging unified memory memcpy instead of blit encoding for tensor device transfers,module: memory usage,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,172987,176317,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #176317 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=12,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",fe8d9911ffcb0620b40dbe86ec710142cb1bbf1281d940fd3f49b2da8dab135b
+BUNDLE-362,bundle:bundle-362,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: functorch (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,176265,Add backward batching rules for SDPA and fix attn_bias under vmap,module: functorch,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,187266,176265,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #176265 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=4,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d4148bac03ac8bbb58f233ea4b914d3804ee20abab4cb9f1860a399c24e83d69
+BUNDLE-363,bundle:bundle-363,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: build (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,173519,Add on-demand ppc64le wheel build support,module: build,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,180362,173519,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #173519 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=22,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",59d4241210a17918c18d3cd69235c44e10f20fd8890f4375b4cf4cd4a31c5b72
+BUNDLE-364,bundle:bundle-364,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: fsdp (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,162706,Fix accelerator-related skip-decorators for tests,module: fsdp,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,162179,162706,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #162706 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2ac28dd26ceb45b3682b39d3602509f4a01824df61fb69b292f8b59395210b3b
+BUNDLE-365,bundle:bundle-365,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: pipelining (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,153557,"[PP] wip, allow grad to be None",module: pipelining,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,153484,153557,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #153557 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=110,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",986dabf6c73e200032c6ac23aeb814465b65f38802b923b8cde7f8f73fdf2039
+BUNDLE-366,bundle:bundle-366,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: decompositions (3 issues + 2 PRs),pr,186091,Preserve CUDA LSTM in Inductor,module: decompositions,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"91439, 140845, 149909","185902, 186091",3,2,failed_ci_checks,"PR #186091 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), +1 more.","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), +1 more, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), in...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b8f74909c2448d10f7f92bbcee17d79332658c501dc0a1c94a0eec460f2d983c
+BUNDLE-367,bundle:bundle-367,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: rocm (3 issues + 1 PR),pr,188006,[ROCm] Fix torch.pdist correctness on ROCm; re-enable test_pdist_norm_large,module: rocm,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"168861, 168863, 168868",188006,3,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #188006 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8807d04c755683317aa656ac841a03e7e5b7c56732b12f91cc9608ea14b9cb45
+BUNDLE-368,bundle:bundle-368,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (2 issues + 2 PRs),pr,186069,Fix Dynamo round on NumPy scalar results,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"141258, 146951","185815, 186069",2,2,failed_ci_checks,PR #186069 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f77ca89878e119cde236f08e47f304839e43f13074a327f47a6bb3680cf09f27
+BUNDLE-369,bundle:bundle-369,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: autograd (2 issues + 2 PRs),pr,186466,Fix scalar Tensor args for custom op float schemas in Dynamo,module: autograd,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"123470, 162687","185132, 186466",2,2,failed_ci_checks,PR #186466 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8e510abb64bdca95d321a119265aa3b835ff51221cb469c6c479b2b6239e9f12
+BUNDLE-370,bundle:bundle-370,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: docker (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,186538,Fix CUDA driver linking for Inductor CUTLASS builds,module: docker,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"103417, 103891",186538,2,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186538 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d80f569137d8a64ed21fc4f1271d52389f321063351b3e9d2242a6369fa40f60
+BUNDLE-371,bundle:bundle-371,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,186406,Fix invalid source in AOT repro generation,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"128830, 134885",186406,2,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186406 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",18cb3ce0134772e599d2973b2c56bbefcdedc4d815cec331cfda03ff88fdf02f
+BUNDLE-372,bundle:bundle-372,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: dynamo (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,186366,Support vmapped compiled autograd.Functions,module: dynamo,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"129845, 133493",186366,2,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #186366 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (i...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d5bfb5afe0dbd4eb4ea5544972d06cc6eff494d61cce9cb4a7db29a30e0ef990
+BUNDLE-373,bundle:bundle-373,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,186180,Fix Dynamo cProfile under active Python profilers,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"137869, 139232",186180,2,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186180 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5e62fdfecaf71447599c1eb6683e7b01f7cce7c564d52a46fbae51455e494449
+BUNDLE-374,bundle:bundle-374,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,185528,Fix Dynamo tracing of compile support checks,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"120115, 154259",185528,2,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185528 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",79560de5e835a9251173944ecdd72294bb3f5a7f8a5eff1e19308c625ca0351d
+BUNDLE-375,bundle:bundle-375,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,185462,Fix NumPy ndarray operators under default device contexts,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"140884, 156162",185462,2,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185462 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e935e257cafb3c05c237db473b0264b855e24ad4ea0c8bb433a103a8eb534778
+BUNDLE-376,bundle:bundle-376,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dtensor (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,185356,Fix DTensor embedding mask state under compile,module: dtensor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"159843, 160697",185356,2,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185356 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7aa996f62df8c004175c8c248025ff9bda0eccf0012e1f1c6372297447d9f410
+BUNDLE-377,bundle:bundle-377,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: higher order operators (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,185116,Thread effect tokens through cond branches,module: higher order operators,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"163143, 165981",185116,2,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185116 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",79c8f1c409d1d83de027abf3094f41e54685a3e96b3f979056c6ac569f1c62aa
+BUNDLE-378,bundle:bundle-378,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: dispatch (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,184223,Run Inductor fallbacks below autograd,module: dispatch,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"139521, 139629",184223,2,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #184223 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",25845d4a838382eba845f53eb663cf53e899723a627c82087a56474de2151d11
+BUNDLE-379,bundle:bundle-379,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: inductor (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,184121,Improve persistent tiled reduction defaults,module: inductor,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"148682, 149982",184121,2,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #184121 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8). Review signal: My agent says I rebased t...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d8e29ac77bac4141e4533d61915af84a2561c3428243ba69de20868e123ab66d
+BUNDLE-380,bundle:bundle-380,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: inductor (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,184016,Fix Inductor DCE for fallback alias mutations,module: inductor,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"166009, 166014",184016,2,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #184016 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (induct...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",856315e10ea723b13a6b0344d1ef247c64abf10bc16f1fa6cccd44e2ad8b44c8
+BUNDLE-381,bundle:bundle-381,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (2 issues + 1 PR),pr,132135,"[torch.special] Adding betainc, betaincc, betaincinv, betainccinv, betaln and beta with backward operation",module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"132133, 145014",132135,2,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #132135 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c6b3bb3123a0e28dacbd06bae958324438144a519c5e04e86d6b395a7dfb45c8
+BUNDLE-382,bundle:bundle-382,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: privateuse1 (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,189174,Fix dcp privateuse1 stream support,module: privateuse1,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,165097,189174,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189174 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",dc5a6f0d1e94116c286db262abb87d72d03329175cbcc76006df88f7b997fb6a
+BUNDLE-383,bundle:bundle-383,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: activation checkpointing (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,188906,Add torch.utils.checkpoint.register_determinism_check,module: activation checkpointing,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,162980,188906,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188906 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",81a6b4ee3e781adafa2f8c6266deecc0f474daebc7ecf511cefdba1fcc3567df
+BUNDLE-384,bundle:bundle-384,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186897,Warn when custom op int schema specializes SymInts,module: dynamic shapes,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,154851,186897,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #186897 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f29485dc633f17309f93fe09a818a8f347968d5130f011372aacebcb574c66a1
+BUNDLE-385,bundle:bundle-385,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186893,Fix dynamic size-one tensor recompiles,module: dynamic shapes,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,160271,186893,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #186893 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), pallas-tpu-py3.12-inductor / test (inductor-pallas-tpu, 1, 1, linux.google.tpuv7x.1).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), pallas-tpu-py3.12-inductor / test (inductor-pallas-tpu, 1, 1, linux.google.tpuv7x.1), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), pallas-tpu-py3.12-inductor / test (inductor-pallas-tpu, 1, 1, linux.google.tpuv7x.1). Review signal: My agent says I rebased the ghstack PR onto current main and fixed the CI failures from dy...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4de3f04e85183ae37a8e7eeccab355ee9d8b1397270616d4417c9f66450ff689
+BUNDLE-386,bundle:bundle-386,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186886,Fix keyed user Triton autotune in Inductor,module: dynamic shapes,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,164124,186886,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186886 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",130831bab2c355c553582ca35f221c3e1932fac6bcf6e97e341242a113be46ef
+BUNDLE-387,bundle:bundle-387,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: minifier (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186564,Skip uninitialized outputs during accuracy minification,module: minifier,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,93437,186564,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186564 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3d69e1703c4bccdd58936f52c0fafd511d11e411fc87cbe14fbb97fd3d59a971
+BUNDLE-388,bundle:bundle-388,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186553,[dynamo] Graph break on packed sequence lower ops,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,93501,186553,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186553 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",79dad078e2e1de3b64384dd43a11ee14c273450319ed7eae104ad116edcd7f5d
+BUNDLE-389,bundle:bundle-389,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: minifier (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186551,Preserve symbolic tensor metadata in after-AOT repros,module: minifier,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,93367,186551,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186551 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5e716a1496c90a546812b2ac77db940fd5f5673c1834802859fbed182e2adb5b
+BUNDLE-390,bundle:bundle-390,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: minifier (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186546,Preserve original Dynamo minifier backend failures,module: minifier,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,97750,186546,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186546 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",69b2cd4a21fdfa0f5297d639b065fd9eb45318046118b4a29581c951e99afea7
+BUNDLE-391,bundle:bundle-391,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: convolution (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186534,Account for fanout in Inductor reuse realization,module: convolution,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,105768,186534,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186534 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c360ba3f50bf71e090122249c9e267acc967e2cef7ebc5a438ab109545623c34
+BUNDLE-392,bundle:bundle-392,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: custom-operators (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186533,Fix SymInt vector dispatcher signature detection,module: custom-operators,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,106135,186533,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186533 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b444c3c490b07adad07bddec0a5872b463cf1028c9dd6b29fe7f28b07e267d8c
+BUNDLE-393,bundle:bundle-393,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: memory usage (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186531,Remove stale Dynamo skip for max_pool1d pooling test,module: memory usage,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,111320,186531,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186531 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",cbd1f0279b090ebdf07e0625dc0c8762efefc8e806f43fada5c1334db57046e0
+BUNDLE-394,bundle:bundle-394,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186530,[dynamo] Restore autocast dtype after trace-time updates,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,111385,186530,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186530 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2cb5b7f98df748ac1e60eb2b427889923009f0a6ef4369cf765efe27078c085c
+BUNDLE-395,bundle:bundle-395,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186520,Preserve SymInt bindings in dynamic-shape minifier repros,module: dynamic shapes,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,114296,186520,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186520 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",654c9d78841f4b7814bda2d353d97d8b99d98e0ffcb7ee9acbeedd324200b64e
+BUNDLE-396,bundle:bundle-396,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186507,Invalidate Dynamo caches when module hooks change,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,117265,186507,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #186507 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",01b81511fc1688278fc3e28f649623d9c3a0dbce7ccf3a063ae5d2446a4be95a
+BUNDLE-397,bundle:bundle-397,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186505,Simplify mod-one symbolic shape guards,module: dynamic shapes,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,118332,186505,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186505 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0da09841c9b34b32c4449c681dbad29c300349925d89f748aa734e8828019cbf
+BUNDLE-398,bundle:bundle-398,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186504,Allow HOP speculation through torch autograd.Function skipfiles,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,118334,186504,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186504 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f26842d69c44a368030c4a284bc24c9655fad26f086bdab67b3f9a67bf2a55e0
+BUNDLE-399,bundle:bundle-399,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: aotdispatch (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186503,Preserve input aliases for multi-output view returns,module: aotdispatch,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,118739,186503,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186503 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",be8b99d94855d4e0a05468a4d386c1d2a6fc5f8c2709977d48bbb827fefc838b
+BUNDLE-400,bundle:bundle-400,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: logging (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186502,Make context decorator frames identify the context manager,module: logging,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,118747,186502,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186502 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7a245a40f56a157a52301ae4be933783f5b5603ac90ee20f3aecff9582ff007f
+BUNDLE-401,bundle:bundle-401,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186500,Fix Dynamo resume after f-string logging graph breaks,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,120375,186500,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186500 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a3116d3af0acb843379b39308726ee27eb4b1094ebe92a8dfed9c832b21d698a
+BUNDLE-402,bundle:bundle-402,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186498,Add dynamic shape test assertions for input dims,module: dynamic shapes,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,120911,186498,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186498 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c1ca96fd0eaf7f5d33bbb1d2050af0c968516f0b4b738b239400e5b626e063d6
+BUNDLE-403,bundle:bundle-403,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: logging (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186495,Initialize compile context for non-strict export tracing,module: logging,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,121318,186495,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186495 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f2ce58aed4b61811d61c0e6b0904b07a29668b131a8358953bd46dd73a18cc4b
+BUNDLE-404,bundle:bundle-404,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: user triton (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186494,[Dynamo] Constant-fold CUDA Tensor.is_pinned(),module: user triton,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,121526,186494,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186494 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9e1f384492f05b8f4f842b32c72907acfdd13fe60af885ab9ecf89403dbe1f54
+BUNDLE-405,bundle:bundle-405,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186487,Run Dynamo compilation with empty functorch stack,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,122200,186487,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186487 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e46571142b5858b4587efadbd3ff79d5a67d96d4ec07721784f94d032afa6a60
+BUNDLE-406,bundle:bundle-406,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186485,Fix export dynamic dims with size-one examples,module: dynamic shapes,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,122294,186485,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #186485 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), +1 more.","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), +1 more, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",81278e9c3d693b682c16e640245a23bc309d201c3485a2496732c7d3deae1d84
+BUNDLE-407,bundle:bundle-407,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186472,Graph break on dynamic unspecialized ModuleList indexing,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,122578,186472,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186472 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2cad64438919024aa392f2c9d068e2bc68a677a4599f2ab05b469ff87c87e95f
+BUNDLE-408,bundle:bundle-408,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186471,Handle symbolic tensors in overlap status,module: dynamic shapes,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,122773,186471,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186471 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f09d12823601df9b3f69b2de00a0daadbb99b468eaac5deeec79cf6897c2b8e2
+BUNDLE-409,bundle:bundle-409,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186469,Wrap Dynamo-generated bytecode runtime errors,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,123374,186469,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186469 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ca263870874bd8461c560116686d6ea0d98dc732e40c947d3d984cc1ed8096a0
+BUNDLE-410,bundle:bundle-410,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186467,Preserve non-persistent buffers in compiled modules,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,123411,186467,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186467 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e11d2f263cc5f3024145f7b0f9fe40ee88d0582d4b7297104edc319d94e81423
+BUNDLE-411,bundle:bundle-411,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186464,Fix singleton quotient divisibility replacement,module: dynamic shapes,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,123651,186464,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186464 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",96383bc29d9e828b50acf99200a494c807d3d00b2757458528bd53ff22b15079
+BUNDLE-412,bundle:bundle-412,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: mta (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186463,Split foreach bool inplace error samples,module: mta,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,123663,186463,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186463 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",647b6e1ad758d637e04be82f3cee3691efa9f2c3e83c58a5a3051aa451c31d7b
+BUNDLE-413,bundle:bundle-413,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: higher order operators (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186462,Allow cond branch mutation during export,module: higher order operators,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,123972,186462,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186462 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1369f45ed6d3ed01c98be30172e66fcb68527f811f31559a713f952ba42fc633
+BUNDLE-414,bundle:bundle-414,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186461,Fix SymBool equality handling in symbolic shapes,module: dynamic shapes,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,124110,186461,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186461 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",298f55e9d6124cd6af4e771b20f49d29e4bc0e96bbf3088c47ff337c813c9cfc
+BUNDLE-415,bundle:bundle-415,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186460,Support dynamic mode in Dynamo explain,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,124163,186460,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186460 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",cc9297eef8ae3b8432d50543d8f7985c2d5143ddd382734d8c77c7937780f27c
+BUNDLE-416,bundle:bundle-416,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: ci (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186455,Fix AOTAutograd Dynamo memory leak repro,module: ci,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,124747,186455,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186455 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f224812e55b249617814dac023168a220dbb1ecbe1eb4fc1321e8d4cc96a1337
+BUNDLE-417,bundle:bundle-417,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: correctness (silent) (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186446,Fix fake overlap handling for Dynamo try/except,module: correctness (silent),"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,126474,186446,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #186446 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, lf-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, lf-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, lf-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, lf-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, lf-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, lf-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",80d8bbb4ce08b4a9bf80462cb19c642c5816b44b5cbe2cc4a32019b819937bb8
+BUNDLE-418,bundle:bundle-418,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: optimizer (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186444,Fix Adam capturable zero-lr NaNs,module: optimizer,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,126514,186444,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #186444 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",712396cf2dbbb6b9f3bbb702526d7267af29024f2bda2a1149f01fe2b455298a
+BUNDLE-419,bundle:bundle-419,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186443,Validate random_ and uniform_ meta arguments,module: dynamo,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,126834,186443,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186443 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8bea8a1f6b053080d5b568e5761cf1325441533860a0d32987645fada357a3f4
+BUNDLE-420,bundle:bundle-420,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186435,Fix mkldnn FakeTensor error handling,module: dynamo,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,127111,186435,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186435 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",638bedf10c8d5dfc9a3b68eedf16f7df33bf9e7851a814cdf56b6e8b8ca09be7
+BUNDLE-421,bundle:bundle-421,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: onnx (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186429,Fix ONNX export of pad_sequence with symbolic split lengths,module: onnx,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,127153,186429,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186429 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",17fd18908c69e73d42594116a9a50d713f271b57bbff2ef708bc23fdb8f038d7
+BUNDLE-422,bundle:bundle-422,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186420,Run torchrec tests in Dynamo CI,module: dynamo,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,128531,186420,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #186420 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8a94a501aaa2c315cd7a0720c1305ca7c9ab289b593e499b504ee359ca1722d8
+BUNDLE-423,bundle:bundle-423,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: oncall: pt2 (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186415,Fix Dynamo Parameter construction in new modules,oncall: pt2,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,128556,186415,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #186415 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",577ce1a940861111270a706add9695d4293ee4b645a506d53659ad4b557e2d47
+BUNDLE-424,bundle:bundle-424,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186409,Fix subclass view replay with dynamic metadata,module: dynamic shapes,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,128649,186409,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186409 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",460bc338a329cb87a8d07d6cd97269683449a7ec5e5d86f5213452fb17af8538
+BUNDLE-425,bundle:bundle-425,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186397,Keep constant-false torch._check in compiled graph,module: dynamo,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,129327,186397,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #186397 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,Rebase - we recently made some fixes to torch._check handling in Dynamo | My agent says I rebased the PR onto current main as requested and adapted the constant-false torch._check path to the newer Dynamo message handling. The rebased diff is now just...,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8a052c4d88f790d46c68d63c43a343a7a85b8a1a893e05ee2c965ecd95c72ad5
+BUNDLE-426,bundle:bundle-426,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: functionalization (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186380,Run python decompositions under functionalization,module: functionalization,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,129418,186380,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #186380 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g). Review signal: My agent says I rebased the PR and addressed the cu...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0b0ea73f2c02e68b01e28886f2e40d01ea9042811e9d8455d12659522eaa28c8
+BUNDLE-427,bundle:bundle-427,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186373,Disable duck sizing by default,module: dynamic shapes,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,129456,186373,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186373 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7f1615bef8ae15cf6a493198711faa71036eb267467f1dda73d7e8ccf344a925
+BUNDLE-428,bundle:bundle-428,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186372,Fix torch.Tensor construction from traced NumPy arrays,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,129648,186372,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186372 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",43dfcc258424ac334a94d22182da0681ea9d9bf787cf9c5c3fcc759f6ce6a403
+BUNDLE-429,bundle:bundle-429,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186364,Prevent guard validation from mutating ShapeEnv,module: dynamic shapes,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,129936,186364,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186364 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",aab13c272a521e584e0ef67d27ece815ce9e0e5179cd0b901a61028878e3e355
+BUNDLE-430,bundle:bundle-430,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: aotdispatch (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186355,Fix AOTAutograd unused output backward pruning,module: aotdispatch,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,131794,186355,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #186355 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c15a6c032939b57d5a9a9608fa6367afc6395ae71c86770751472923ceea3803
+BUNDLE-431,bundle:bundle-431,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186349,Improve Dynamo logger method graph-break guidance,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,132635,186349,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186349 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a5410cd21fc8c2efcb2710f41ce7ebe1aac9ea3c3fe27ee8b2bb2e478f0d23a4
+BUNDLE-432,bundle:bundle-432,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: compile ux (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186340,Ensure explicit compile attempts skipped code,module: compile ux,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,132923,186340,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #186340 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g). Review signal: My agent says I rebased this PR onto current main past the unrelated NaiveDilatedConvolution trunk build failure and addressed the review-subagent findings before resubmitting. The C++ eval-frame override now preserve...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e6d311f3aa67cac87f5fcd8961cac352590a60407fade187211829af62647ef8
+BUNDLE-433,bundle:bundle-433,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186291,Fix export distribution validation assertions,module: dynamic shapes,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,135061,186291,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186291 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",91082485ee6bf92c5bfd8c5b3224583e4e6cc03fe5cc645a0da13c2eadcee731
+BUNDLE-434,bundle:bundle-434,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: pt2-dispatcher (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186287,Reject non-functional export decomposition entries,module: pt2-dispatcher,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,135759,186287,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186287 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d4b143b1d1ab0f392fa0f9f6283076bd779d9cb09da2e22602962e528f3019b6
+BUNDLE-435,bundle:bundle-435,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186283,Trace data_ptr through tensor constructors,module: dynamo,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,136271,186283,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186283 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c3f12e21c44f2de44a782d8e51359068726351e2126407b40a45ce89bb65f560
+BUNDLE-436,bundle:bundle-436,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: vllm (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186280,Disable profiler Python tracing during compile,module: vllm,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,136404,186280,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186280 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",66e86fa4d40d4260c728fdd39ebe64904d24593a14cb210f16bb05f593741664
+BUNDLE-437,bundle:bundle-437,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186263,Increase small fake tensor constant limit,module: dynamic shapes,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,136642,186263,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #186263 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-cpu-test / test-osdc (cpu_inductor_torchbench, 1, 2, mt-l-x86iamx-8-64, unstable).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-cpu-test / test-osdc (cpu_inductor_torchbench, 1, 2, mt-l-x86iamx-8-64, unstable), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-cpu-test / test-osdc (cpu_induc...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",999eb2d78ee38d2d45931ee95281f63777b8c463f0cc60a6def32b52012f9723
+BUNDLE-438,bundle:bundle-438,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186249,[dynamo] Support time.time as a runtime scalar input,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,137068,186249,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186249 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0975a713da044eef57085ba222aa66af947760378d6363b651a81c8e97d781db
+BUNDLE-439,bundle:bundle-439,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: nestedtensor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186225,Preserve NJT nested ints in AOT subclass outputs,module: nestedtensor,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,137275,186225,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186225 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9a6c07c37b2cdf1080be019cf664816861bb0ef341581539540d3b2cc9cae7f0
+BUNDLE-440,bundle:bundle-440,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186222,Include epilogue guards in Dynamo code_parts,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,137388,186222,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186222 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b9100d90f8bb95bae626d26d545f55738ac2c161e4adcb3810a7971776a6db08
+BUNDLE-441,bundle:bundle-441,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: oncall: pt2 (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186217,Move FX graph cache hash details out of debug logs,oncall: pt2,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,137875,186217,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186217 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b21de850c9b923c07f51208aceee1202ca0ab01d57fa76d3fca8b25a415c038d
+BUNDLE-442,bundle:bundle-442,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: oncall: pt2 (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186214,Profile lazy backward compilation with cProfile,oncall: pt2,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,137996,186214,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186214 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",bb7275e9817e7dc827173c7a729a348990e6e500db87888eaaf1fc12f81927b2
+BUNDLE-443,bundle:bundle-443,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186194,Canonicalize trunc of symbolic integer division by one,oncall: export,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,138926,186194,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186194 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f0a57f9f736589af6b09b9ac867710b786d9e1365d0ea2d20264803480ee4aeb
+BUNDLE-444,bundle:bundle-444,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: multithreading (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186192,Fix CompiledFxGraph callable state across threads,module: multithreading,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,138961,186192,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186192 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",fbefcad73f410f575fbaeb93ab140ed0a87ec21c496c96572f240d137c37aee8
+BUNDLE-445,bundle:bundle-445,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186189,Report dynamo expected-failure XPASSes,module: dynamo,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,139080,186189,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186189 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0e4d32751fd22e7700f511678ac32c4b9330bbdaa16bf042dad070a4e986a760
+BUNDLE-446,bundle:bundle-446,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: faketensor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186188,Fix FakeTensor wrapping for meta tensor constructor,module: faketensor,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,139092,186188,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186188 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",245ad06043cf4eb8085acfc8211eb0858d6197a6f037fc6d76b1fd0089fb7fd5
+BUNDLE-447,bundle:bundle-447,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186168,Fix Dynamo tracing of torch.random.fork_rng,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,139603,186168,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186168 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",48575eed8c54e5b7d4175625b0ab1d0f5ee5ab57d314bbc16193d2b82e5cbd3d
+BUNDLE-448,bundle:bundle-448,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: forward ad (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186160,Fix FakeTensor forward AD batch_norm meta rewrapping,module: forward ad,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,139756,186160,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #186160 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_huggingface, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), linux-jammy-py3.14t-clang18 / test-osdc (default, 3, 5, mt-l-x86iavx512-16-128), unit-test / inductor-cpu-build / build-osdc, +1 more.","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_huggingface, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), linux-jammy-py3.14t-clang18 / test-osdc (default, 3, 5, mt-l-x86iavx512-16-128), unit-test / inductor-cpu-build / build-osdc, +1 more, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_huggingface, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), linux-jammy-py3.14t-clang18 / test-osdc (default, 3, 5, mt-l-x86iavx512-16-128), unit-test / inductor-cpu-build / build-osdc, +1 more.",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",dbabb353730b61b874853e750666a9e1bd126456671a29327272a08d8c4633a7
+BUNDLE-449,bundle:bundle-449,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: faketensor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186150,Fix compile storage semantics for as_strided scatter,module: faketensor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,140171,186150,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #186150 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integra...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c7a3dbb140f5db203586d8da54785248bf54347c1f4bd397d3396c130ccaf14a
+BUNDLE-450,bundle:bundle-450,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186082,Improve SymIntArrayRef concrete-int diagnostics,module: dynamic shapes,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,140960,186082,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186082 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",362b8a97cee7d4336b4b66209811690ab159a1aa53e6db5120426568c7780384
+BUNDLE-451,bundle:bundle-451,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186078,Fix OptimizedModule _parameters access,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,141005,186078,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186078 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ad37705fdc564f4f49db05c5b6bec3e4b08bbea38e21398523648a08ee4cd499
+BUNDLE-452,bundle:bundle-452,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: pt2 accuracy (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186074,Fix multilabel_margin_loss decomposition sentinel handling,module: pt2 accuracy,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,141017,186074,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186074 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9ca84e9236314ff43e865e728bf6b719dfd29d635364f6cd4e7958845198780a
+BUNDLE-453,bundle:bundle-453,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186072,Make constant warnings reorderable in Dynamo by default,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,141162,186072,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186072 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d63276d0ca0a78d7ed8b6f2e10807e26c639e1cf791a5e924a5c6ff6d5694f68
+BUNDLE-454,bundle:bundle-454,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186063,[dynamo] Route OptimizedModule delegated methods through compiled call,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,141473,186063,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186063 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",729124db209e3a2a6a4b9675671cfdaf10cbd4267ee87a5ddce4ac33486a4f30
+BUNDLE-455,bundle:bundle-455,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: aotdispatch (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186053,Fix AOTAutograd cache save for call-free lazy backwards,module: aotdispatch,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,141790,186053,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186053 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d37ca4793c54640582f16235c60bff57bb7f6f680324ca07a555acbe062d267f
+BUNDLE-456,bundle:bundle-456,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: windows (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186052,Fix Inductor C++ pybinding source literal escaping,module: windows,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,142321,186052,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186052 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1393f81c1783689f409460b3253d9227ec9ca86bb01f4baba1d86c656a216d1b
+BUNDLE-457,bundle:bundle-457,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186044,Stop Dynamo from importing optional libraries at import time,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,142489,186044,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #186044 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), get-label-type / runner-determinator, get-cuda-version.","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), get-label-type / runner-determinator, get-cuda-version, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), get-label-type / runner-determinator, get-cuda-version. Review signal: My agent says I rebased the PR and fixed the latest related CI issues: the imp...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",47f58931eeabae5da56ca0d1921898caee48e336aba1d84056ee32ca14c558e9
+BUNDLE-458,bundle:bundle-458,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186039,Fix Dynamo verbose guard checks for frame locals,module: dynamo,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,143308,186039,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186039 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9e95ab26caf21245f61c1ceb8b35337ef92d09d0a312b914035ff2abc3036871
+BUNDLE-459,bundle:bundle-459,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186032,Avoid reshape metadata guards on symbolic size-one checks,module: dynamic shapes,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,143463,186032,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #186032 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c99e7e32c37900b05881890219bcb074dc57918ccdc6d202e1bc08a59cfd9eda
+BUNDLE-460,bundle:bundle-460,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: faketensor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186027,Fix symbolic broadcast inference for unbacked sizes,module: faketensor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,143495,186027,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #186027 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (i...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2f6ab15f596d3adcf4e4500e11d738fdfd62ae352a7f61342991ab5119819ddd
+BUNDLE-461,bundle:bundle-461,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: compile ux (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,186003,Fix Dynamo condition-dependent frame skip caching,module: compile ux,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,144820,186003,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #186003 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5bd40f1bf7305588d19fd8fd5bd17e4cf51ec6313701b83151e030c6cf2a72c0
+BUNDLE-462,bundle:bundle-462,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185971,Fix Dynamo random.Random replay on cache hits,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,145445,185971,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185971 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a81456d7c44c7c701ec0cf0e1465a7d75418bf5563696a9c17f83f6e6bdbba35
+BUNDLE-463,bundle:bundle-463,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185947,Fix Dynamo logit with tensor eps,module: dynamic shapes,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,145596,185947,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185947 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3b1350c4bb3cf9069112817860857bcd0c7266385d128f9000928a412cfe1575
+BUNDLE-464,bundle:bundle-464,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: faketensor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185922,Fix fake one_hot invalid class count checks,module: faketensor,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,146274,185922,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185922 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d77914215ab0f2ae4e7f269179c1d61105d18f90ce9b200d4900e3d429d4c5af
+BUNDLE-465,bundle:bundle-465,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185920,[Dynamo] Detect tensor mutations when reconstructing generators,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,146628,185920,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185920 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8). Review signal: My agent says I rebased the PR onto current main, addressed the latest review hardening around Dynamo polyfill inlining, and fixed an additional generat...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b59077efadc2d3f8049d1709765a406991b9bdffc9f22f149898be71cc72a16f
+BUNDLE-466,bundle:bundle-466,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185908,[Dynamo] Preserve live dict view semantics around mappingproxy mutation,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,149583,185908,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185908 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), +1 more.","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), +1 more, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (i...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8de9fc8389e52b620ff9bbb14b503aac74ba126c4f8b2785511e56c6bb2482f1
+BUNDLE-467,bundle:bundle-467,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185899,Fix Dynamo data mutation on functorch tensors,module: dynamo,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,149911,185899,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #185899 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",683a5c39b890c4c80ef41f5d4c55bd3631a462951de09279d526beb0f39d411e
+BUNDLE-468,bundle:bundle-468,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185823,[Dynamo] Handle class method_descriptor calls generically,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,146673,185823,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185823 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",95b24351d870fd3ef26d46644b392733ea2bacbe5d7cf79daaaf5b3b2ed07f9d
+BUNDLE-469,bundle:bundle-469,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: logging (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185800,Fix TORCH_LOGS stderr handling at process exit,module: logging,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,147486,185800,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185800 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9e2b0ec2fe44a1e9af8b29d54e88a8f31c899eec23dbae49bb658b1b73cf077d
+BUNDLE-470,bundle:bundle-470,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185799,Avoid dataclass constructors in Dynamo and make_fx graphs,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,147530,185799,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185799 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ad280433c20f4ef56e2d7731ec8d934be50fea5cb5ec59d1475b1a01c305213d
+BUNDLE-471,bundle:bundle-471,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: oncall: pt2 (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185795,Preserve overlapping input layouts when cloning Dynamo inputs,oncall: pt2,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,147843,185795,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185795 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",00e19eb249e083ba38543b4213ca9e10a5512bba5ba5aebf2a2caeda82bfa2d7
+BUNDLE-472,bundle:bundle-472,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185781,Avoid unbound symbols in insignificant output strides,module: dynamic shapes,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,148199,185781,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185781 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",39512bcc2430803c4362eff93b5a1939f360f90e3c01dc360fa241be1f633821
+BUNDLE-473,bundle:bundle-473,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185776,Propagate fake RuntimeErrors to Dynamo handlers,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,148475,185776,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185776 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a3c4ca916b8124f54a4ab1e5d7cbb7bdee825df5511f1def471c7079760f57a7
+BUNDLE-474,bundle:bundle-474,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185774,Fix non-strict export for Tensor.numpy,oncall: export,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,148779,185774,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185774 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",accf09ddc3ac48b80a0b3d3f8353052629f72c6696063d652374b118dd1ad1b1
+BUNDLE-475,bundle:bundle-475,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: oncall: pt2 (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185773,Use max dynamic bounds for Inductor autotuning,oncall: pt2,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,148842,185773,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185773 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",43005f61d8a037b554fd65c8ad30817e44bddc85be07f30924be2611a02e9212
+BUNDLE-476,bundle:bundle-476,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: pt2 accuracy (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185772,Fix CPU small-output bilinear upsample precision in Inductor,module: pt2 accuracy,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,148859,185772,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185772 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b65b2f0d05cef873122c796ce78dfdaf8c1bb187c904986f052ca906f50f129a
+BUNDLE-477,bundle:bundle-477,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185771,Support Dynamo tracing through textwrap.indent string formatting,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,149010,185771,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185771 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8). Review signal: My agent says I updated the PR after the reported Dynamo CI failures around the textwrap/string-format tests. The update rebases onto current main, keeps the ghstack metadata intact, adds coverage for joining delayed...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",40f3891932230be60c6bd2711e3c65f4490a79abe250c535131f55320141ba5e
+BUNDLE-478,bundle:bundle-478,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: oncall: pt2 (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185769,Preserve generator return values in Dynamo,oncall: pt2,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,149037,185769,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185769 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",96f3418a3d913e6b614d7260b9cfbe6a1bce6db9e39ebc303a095350eb10dec8
+BUNDLE-479,bundle:bundle-479,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185768,Improve Dynamo error for dynamic module hook registration,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,149047,185768,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185768 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ab9893dc80d098541603ab5369f2c62cc5abdab7cc75fae56e3ca5cc517fe9f3
+BUNDLE-480,bundle:bundle-480,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185766,Dynamo: support torch.jit.isinstance without graph breaks,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,149556,185766,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185766 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a900e1648d3a379cbda4832d920bb6154c9a459a0577dc5cd75cccb02a765044
+BUNDLE-481,bundle:bundle-481,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: compile ux (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185764,Recommend nonstrict_trace for skipped C extensions,module: compile ux,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,149565,185764,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185764 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (i...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",07941cd746668fe3469caf38501a1d62369fed786e35e8b666b8d66fa8acc16c
+BUNDLE-482,bundle:bundle-482,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185763,Improve disable API graph break messages,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,149566,185763,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185763 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1222576cf8437592c83ca93e9d2d48f835cea48eb8213bdb6fdc1b38188b835b
+BUNDLE-483,bundle:bundle-483,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: sdpa (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185755,Use gmem efficient attention kernel for long fp32 KV,module: sdpa,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,149857,185755,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185755 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0651d36384dcf95f48cfec1888af188d1dbfcbcbe0ddc164055b3058bebb74fd
+BUNDLE-484,bundle:bundle-484,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185752,Make OptimizedModule state_dict use public keys,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,149894,185752,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185752 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c8974b7b12a85e9a2d88b4093d68f11974948649df5a0daad0772b3e65604ee9
+BUNDLE-485,bundle:bundle-485,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185749,Fix Dynamo construction for classes with __getattribute__,module: dynamo,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,149895,185749,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185749 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7cde6cf9713e33d633119eaa88bc977636dec7a697c4bcd948eb4d2419a89a90
+BUNDLE-486,bundle:bundle-486,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185748,[dynamo] Model RemovableHandle hook registration side effects,module: dynamo,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,149921,185748,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185748 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",530345375911d5fba549a564fcd94d69961d8f9952dcbb29bd87c6d5a77e3cb0
+BUNDLE-487,bundle:bundle-487,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185740,Support inspect.signature on nested functions in Dynamo,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,149968,185740,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185740 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e0efaadcd299ef2c72146b7f4c073be4df27100e2d7e1817e9751ae4ed63646e
+BUNDLE-488,bundle:bundle-488,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: compile ux (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185731,Clear stale prefix exception table entries in Dynamo,module: compile ux,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,150319,185731,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185731 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1ebe809d8af0e15cbd16e0b3890cc6d03cff8bbe74a61ccd04c123237de6b7b1
+BUNDLE-489,bundle:bundle-489,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185726,Improve Dynamo stack for nonstrict_trace input errors,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,150465,185726,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185726 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6fe98bcaec35c6f11cffc6a63d1053957688715584029a3b81a1be2e564fd655
+BUNDLE-490,bundle:bundle-490,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: decompositions (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185724,Fix scalar searchsorted decomposition for unbacked values,module: decompositions,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,150613,185724,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185724 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0f8ba085a676afc85527d416dcf5f0c281f0f325643eea6d86b0824e8dba4084
+BUNDLE-491,bundle:bundle-491,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: compile ux (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185722,[dynamo] Wrap module.compile leaf module call frames,module: compile ux,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,150915,185722,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185722 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",12830baccfd1616d4468beef51343945dc4bdcfd2607478a8dcf6e8a63056b99
+BUNDLE-492,bundle:bundle-492,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: oncall: pt2 (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185690,Optimize AOT input view mutations,oncall: pt2,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,152346,185690,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #185690 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",097971873caa5fc2edcde16cc7082d3d8b43f7362fc9f7235af074cc167ba3ea
+BUNDLE-493,bundle:bundle-493,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: oncall: pt2 (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185632,Make AOTAutograd metadata repr subclass-safe,oncall: pt2,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,152183,185632,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185632 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ee1641da3dd8ac1ac3bf0a235f60ca8a0624c484a755018ff77a9d837d81d63e
+BUNDLE-494,bundle:bundle-494,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: __torch_dispatch__ (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185624,Fix subclass static input remapping for SymInt args,module: __torch_dispatch__,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,152343,185624,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185624 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",55ad9cd459957a0943d9fad488d7dc05b2ace24951ce08d0919c3161eb1d8bfa
+BUNDLE-495,bundle:bundle-495,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: docs (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185591,Canonicalize avg_pool2d singleton lists during export,module: docs,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,153149,185591,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185591 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9dca02b04041f44c9dd1fa43788c763b5ba19101915912c2757eb67b48b20138
+BUNDLE-496,bundle:bundle-496,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185588,[inductor] Codegen backed SymInt input runtime asserts,module: dynamic shapes,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,153175,185588,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185588 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",77416c622f3233bc12bb1ebbb857cf1daafba9b691b1a3df9b9ad8af1522ec5d
+BUNDLE-497,bundle:bundle-497,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185585,Fix mark_unbacked stride recompiles,module: dynamic shapes,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,153204,185585,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185585 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g). Review signal: My agent says Dr. CI's r...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b112b36f344cda30a2d4f4ec9ce34d938aabe66c95ebd56ac90da1f6af60b28c
+BUNDLE-498,bundle:bundle-498,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185569,Handle symbolic bool short-circuit with unbacked terms,module: dynamic shapes,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,153227,185569,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185569 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2b1672eba5bff929f4dbb3c50e0b0d5efc1cb6ca689e9eb7a6582137e1e499db
+BUNDLE-499,bundle:bundle-499,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185536,Teach Dynamo PGO about sparse tensor strides,module: dynamic shapes,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,154161,185536,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185536 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ac3f6e3ea8647bbf08ba2d58f1a8cf3e37e3d5b929a759a6ee3f9241b25dc15c
+BUNDLE-500,bundle:bundle-500,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185526,Fix Dynamo tracing of LazyGraphModule,module: dynamo,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,154282,185526,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185526 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4a91ed508f765304ffd3d8a9b313f42a7e4b308c06e346146a1b423e3cc086e6
+BUNDLE-501,bundle:bundle-501,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: compile ux (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185508,[dynamo] Preserve observed exception stack for reraises,module: compile ux,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,154454,185508,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185508 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",efe19093366f09077fb7b0873078479d8c981a0c38d2be9a3bb587673c0ced16
+BUNDLE-502,bundle:bundle-502,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185483,Add fake support for pad_packed_sequence,module: dynamo,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,155238,185483,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185483 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a7ad28c76b0a07f481449e40025f6fbaa0c5ffcf5196e2018d61952716c82394
+BUNDLE-503,bundle:bundle-503,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: nestedtensor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185474,Fix nested tensor tangent metadata coercion,module: nestedtensor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,155421,185474,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185474 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",413bc8969768a964f15a0021833baf93c896601b6b4e1388fb706fd47b9733d7
+BUNDLE-504,bundle:bundle-504,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185471,Handle Dynamo tracing of torch._C._infer_size,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,155800,185471,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185471 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",41052cb8dfefda88094262a56df8402454de40d79ef61b7c4a7ba5a84848c008
+BUNDLE-505,bundle:bundle-505,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185469,Fix stable TMA descriptor reconstruction in Dynamo,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,155856,185469,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185469 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), linux-docs / build-docs-cpp-false, linux-docs / build-docs-python-false, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), +1 more.","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), linux-docs / build-docs-cpp-false, linux-docs / build-docs-python-false, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), +1 more, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), linux-docs / build-docs-cpp-false, linux-docs / build-docs-python-false, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-18...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8f600232c906abf5c6d2fa6c3bf80da3cc2ed9e0b63931e96e2eab87f1ceb6c7
+BUNDLE-506,bundle:bundle-506,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: correctness (silent) (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185467,Keep tensors alive for Dynamo pointer reconstruction,module: correctness (silent),"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,156059,185467,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185467 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8). Review signal: My agent says I rebased the stack on current main and added data_ptr graph-break lifetime regression coverage, addressing the review-bot suggestion. The previous unclassified CI failures were SIGKILLs in unrelated lar... | My agent says I rebased the PR onto...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3dd458d6d4b6633709bb725aba6d42c4b267829c8697a4aa781862e25e15a929
+BUNDLE-507,bundle:bundle-507,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: compile ux (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185466,[dynamo] Show carets in graph break user stacks,module: compile ux,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,156127,185466,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185466 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",efb5799a81857fea9d1fb4a09b2ad99452562948e041e039a0afd0bf0fdd553a
+BUNDLE-508,bundle:bundle-508,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185461,[dynamo] Handle module-level logging ignores,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,156191,185461,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185461 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0efa4ab179bf7e3fa1bee5303f27e3ef29712630f3f6ec423c361f7ec5fb8443
+BUNDLE-509,bundle:bundle-509,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185456,Fix Dynamo tracing for Tensor.random_,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,156614,185456,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185456 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integra...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3d7ab23102b86e2f600e140fc145f21bbbec4aed1a5ebdf772eaf3e8bd3aeda4
+BUNDLE-510,bundle:bundle-510,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: compile ux (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185451,Wrap internal Dynamo assertion errors,module: compile ux,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,156640,185451,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185451 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8). Review signal: My agent says I rebased the PR onto current main, resolved the symbolic_convert import conflict, and updated stale dynamic-shape tests after CI showed same-frame guard failures now surface as InternalTorchDynamoError....",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c3812c658ac0f7313a7a67c145f4f7a564604073a210d0313aea146e34fa4956
+BUNDLE-511,bundle:bundle-511,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: oncall: pt2 (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185438,Scope distribution validation disabling to Dynamo tracing,oncall: pt2,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,157926,185438,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185438 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7f58c260f8d6f78d158f308bca470021ac0f3daa0a73b3fc72f884877315fe7f
+BUNDLE-512,bundle:bundle-512,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185436,Preserve eager exception assertions for eager_noexcept,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,158087,185436,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185436 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",48459c37df858de686d68752df4efa55d201be2bf9e0cbff335723ed4d8d8b3b
+BUNDLE-513,bundle:bundle-513,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: compile ux (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185419,[dynamo] avoid stale verbose hint for backend failures,module: compile ux,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,158384,185419,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185419 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",38ab65a04ae6c1f0cb0f204b0d50c03b44f4876b4b326a7a032b53dcacd032cd
+BUNDLE-514,bundle:bundle-514,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185408,Fix torch logging to avoid closed pytest stderr,module: dynamo,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,159160,185408,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185408 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",76ce4b98d4575a1a9ee31cd8a2bf5e3c038e8846d7eecff62b90ddd73df5a49b
+BUNDLE-515,bundle:bundle-515,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185373,Fix assume_constant_result tensor constants after graph breaks,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,159457,185373,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185373 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",fa47ef98a23af2cd317221694da59e3e51fa7282103e2d6f106c88740b147f04
+BUNDLE-516,bundle:bundle-516,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185365,Fix FX subgraph rewrite of adjacent aggregate matches,oncall: export,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,159613,185365,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185365 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",606c072975257fd969e40eb89bc477341863912826909be5d7bcd69cac37cdf5
+BUNDLE-517,bundle:bundle-517,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185357,Forward container methods on OptimizedModule,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,159831,185357,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185357 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9d9762592ed4ec0cb3ca9569d477aa4c856a162c299f81859b340592dbea2098
+BUNDLE-518,bundle:bundle-518,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185336,[dynamo] Add regression test for prepended forward pre-hooks,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,160083,185336,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185336 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",81ec008ea118c9b40044606289f96a4e08a9bd41428c0bbbe2a60a3526bc44a4
+BUNDLE-519,bundle:bundle-519,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185333,Graph break existing list tensor assignments in Dynamo,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,160247,185333,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185333 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, lf-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, lf-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), +1 more.","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, lf-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, lf-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), +1 more, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, lf-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, lf-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ea0109c6876aa0a332d9d61b3b2abc231720bd3a7b997b60c8c0ceaab643fd06
+BUNDLE-520,bundle:bundle-520,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185320,Improve scan HOP direct call error,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,160544,185320,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185320 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7bcf885e90174d11cd5821f557d9191b0b1cae7f8d7c83475967f24896f6b6de
+BUNDLE-521,bundle:bundle-521,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: aotdispatch (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185299,Run CSE in AOT inference graphs,module: aotdispatch,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,161067,185299,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #185299 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f134744677f5ffbf9dc4e81e7ad846e76f3e281e066adefcce42c65a77edf8ec
+BUNDLE-522,bundle:bundle-522,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185293,Require bool conditions for torch.where,oncall: export,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,161088,185293,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185293 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",fb415bd12816f640efa0fd409a4c28d98db52d23a158d2fb85ce61828e557034
+BUNDLE-523,bundle:bundle-523,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: oncall: pt2 (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185274,Fix ci expected accuracy updates without ClickHouse credentials,oncall: pt2,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,161289,185274,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #185274 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d46fae8ddfc72c631a896c82d98405a34fe21517b8de11de23909bd10a1d17ac
+BUNDLE-524,bundle:bundle-524,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185191,Support wrapper subclass storages in HOP alias checks,module: dynamo,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,161456,185191,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185191 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e5e9d0e9834a57bc9425f0ce574d48b44038c27696b5f1bad4be86ac6aa5d0ce
+BUNDLE-525,bundle:bundle-525,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: functorch (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185171,Document activation memory budget config,module: functorch,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,161650,185171,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #185171 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d290e3e4f5f940806d4a422127713b2fd65d620406143a9bc750022eb6ac59eb
+BUNDLE-526,bundle:bundle-526,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185166,Fix export slice bounds across dynamic dim,module: dynamic shapes,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,161705,185166,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185166 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b3f096a72cedcd0928a24babf29ca080b5ba8dcce485e0038161537f7b27d3a8
+BUNDLE-527,bundle:bundle-527,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: performance (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185159,Inductor: gate max-autotune 1x1 conv GEMM lowering,module: performance,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,161764,185159,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185159 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, linux-noble-rocm-py3.12-mi300 / test (default, 1, 6, linux.rocm.gpu.gfx942.1), linux-noble-rocm-py3.12-mi300 / test (default, 4, 6, linux.rocm.gpu.gfx942.1), linux-jammy-cuda13.0-py3.10-gcc11-sm100 / test (smoke_b200, 1, 1, linux.dgx.b200), linux-jammy-cuda13.0-py3.10-gcc11-sm90 / test-osdc (smoke, 1, 1, mt-l-x86iamx-22-225-h100), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), +2 more.","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, linux-noble-rocm-py3.12-mi300 / test (default, 1, 6, linux.rocm.gpu.gfx942.1), linux-noble-rocm-py3.12-mi300 / test (default, 4, 6, linux.rocm.gpu.gfx942.1), linux-jammy-cuda13.0-py3.10-gcc11-sm100 / test (smoke_b200, 1, 1, linux.dgx.b200), linux-jammy-cuda13.0-py3.10-gcc11-sm90 / test-osdc (smoke, 1, 1, mt-l-x86iamx-22-225-h100), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), +2 more, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, linux-noble-rocm-py3.12-mi300 / test (default, 1, 6, linux.rocm.gpu.gfx942.1), linux-noble-rocm-py3.12-mi300 / test (default, 4, 6, linux.rocm.gpu.gfx942.1), linux-jammy-cuda13.0-py3.10-gcc11-sm100 / test (smoke_b200, 1, 1, linux.dgx.b200), linux-jammy-cuda13.0-py3.10-gcc11-sm90 / test-osdc (smoke, 1, 1, mt-l-x86iamx-22-225-h100), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d0a363082592ed235a6dfc57be709e879707d7924aad03baf1a75ca638d408cb
+BUNDLE-528,bundle:bundle-528,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: compile ux (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185155,Avoid warning spam for backend fallback graph breaks,module: compile ux,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,161796,185155,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185155 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",efa32a560a21cd07b3e74606f153e9c974e3faa436d7641457533d0a1fbfc5bc
+BUNDLE-529,bundle:bundle-529,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185147,Fix Z3 translation validation for torch.sym_not,module: dynamic shapes,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,162287,185147,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185147 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b2a9f43cfb615050e4a9bb556aef36ab5daceaec76893513278a43e2dba39734
+BUNDLE-530,bundle:bundle-530,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: compile ux (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185138,[dynamo] Enforce one compiled frame for fullgraph skipped frames,module: compile ux,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,162415,185138,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185138 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f910083b9b0f23456e945abda92529437a1a2aea88fd0ee3f5877af381482064
+BUNDLE-531,bundle:bundle-531,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185126,Optimize GB_REGISTRY linter scanning,module: dynamo,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,162973,185126,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185126 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",990e8cfb7b760c8c5b44a1b62b4c8658482c55951bfba355551f84c81ebf2380
+BUNDLE-532,bundle:bundle-532,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185121,Raise TypeError for invalid torch.export.load inputs,oncall: export,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,163040,185121,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185121 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2f144cd333c4e5a65c94a72d9ec2e98f972b71e08cfce1b8f27aadf643d4596d
+BUNDLE-533,bundle:bundle-533,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185103,Fix unbacked scalar equality reasoning through div/mod,module: dynamic shapes,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,163641,185103,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185103 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",90b29eb89de290b42d7e5fc47063d67339e2170599d9a9063d23bd4b89d66e50
+BUNDLE-534,bundle:bundle-534,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: aotdispatch (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185088,Avoid graphsafe RNG inputs in descriptor compile,module: aotdispatch,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,164559,185088,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185088 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3f1175fd94ccd8727916ce902d13ab303ccf0cf353d86e65b7302f66e3c0ed9e
+BUNDLE-535,bundle:bundle-535,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: faketensor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185075,Improve FakeTensorMode deepcopy error for real tensors,module: faketensor,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,165547,185075,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #185075 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",74527a02100b3bb3aa050fdd32e37a3f7961fd2538c491882d6591d3dea9dbe3
+BUNDLE-536,bundle:bundle-536,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: autograd (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185064,Add unroll option to scan,module: autograd,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,166516,185064,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185064 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8). Review signal: My agent says I rebased the PR onto main and pushed a follow-up that fixes the docs CI failure by moving the scan docstring to Napoleon's recognized Key...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",dd1175fe344df1747d9d148df0991f1e98749e10c55892e04a173c8f70f7749b
+BUNDLE-537,bundle:bundle-537,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: higher order operators (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185063,Handle scalar carries in Inductor while_loop,module: higher order operators,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,166525,185063,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185063 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1324a509cbfee3646a6712919f750dded70fecd13217616bdbb014fa74a6d142
+BUNDLE-538,bundle:bundle-538,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: oncall: pt2 (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185051,Fix FX GraphModule serialization of string annotations,oncall: pt2,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,167117,185051,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185051 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a95e9da21d157ab874076445fbaf6c43246a4e228d800ead19639f68b6947223
+BUNDLE-539,bundle:bundle-539,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185042,Avoid value guards for residual lazy constants,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,167596,185042,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185042 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8). Review signal: My agent says I rebased and resubmitted the PR, addressed the latest Claude feedback by documenting the intentional hashable traversal and adding a lazy...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0b0af3a0f314ebc693e2eb951d6aa8c1691bfa9c3f50d9e503b58c31a0e176e5
+BUNDLE-540,bundle:bundle-540,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: oncall: export (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185035,Make symbolic formatting guard data-dependent scalars,oncall: export,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,167719,185035,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #185035 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_models_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f1d986e01fff5e7a4811ed9c80815ab614a3ff0f83f56aacbfbf61639fb083fd
+BUNDLE-541,bundle:bundle-541,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: library (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185017,Fix OpOverloadPacket tracing during initialization,module: library,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,168136,185017,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #185017 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ec85aad85464fc68d4b4f0bd92a10e320caeb0d02377337dfc4f48161fc8ceec
+BUNDLE-542,bundle:bundle-542,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: pt2-dispatcher (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185009,Add fuzzy DebugMode hash mismatch comparison,module: pt2-dispatcher,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,168974,185009,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185009 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ecf60c1098ac25d64b17dedca44bd0f81f8f0cde4fd078a0842fa1a48e8804ac
+BUNDLE-543,bundle:bundle-543,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: pt2-dispatcher (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,185008,Add DebugMode tensor hash export,module: pt2-dispatcher,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,168975,185008,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185008 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f02d652d0eaab80fe1eea556c24fdb5f59e85ab50f96174fec676a14a8c8b83a
+BUNDLE-544,bundle:bundle-544,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: higher order operators (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184988,Allow HOPs to pass through unchanged input tensors,module: higher order operators,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,169769,184988,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #184988 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",94bf15329101d08011eab1921dec4050bb7820298656136cf5c0f73dc1cddf99
+BUNDLE-545,bundle:bundle-545,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184436,Fix Triton async compile cache keys,module: inductor,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,112788,184436,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #184436 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",be485babaf840fc300000944cae5778017de7c1dcf9bc2a8b9db6249dbb94716
+BUNDLE-546,bundle:bundle-546,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: cuda graphs (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184432,Serialize cudagraph tree runtime,module: cuda graphs,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,113809,184432,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #184432 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",34aa12a5377d3fb6800e305d1bba05752a96cb80999a4b6e387bbfce28a01493
+BUNDLE-547,bundle:bundle-547,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184380,Avoid fp32 materialization in checkpoint recompute,module: inductor,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,120381,184380,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #184380 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f36862731bdf970294948651b4ae731eb796d512fb558b37cdc30fa398a269b9
+BUNDLE-548,bundle:bundle-548,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184347,[inductor] Add third reduction tile for strided block pointers,module: inductor,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,125077,184347,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #184347 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6cfe6c18319a10deeb281dfbdd88fc5f8be2314ac88afb5602a17bd671cf0601
+BUNDLE-549,bundle:bundle-549,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184345,Use freezing compiler for traced inference graphs,module: inductor,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,125236,184345,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #184345 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f3be7c9069da563a41c35784d1009f4ef71a4b2d299e9ccff5f90e498c694154
+BUNDLE-550,bundle:bundle-550,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184343,Prune slow Hopper WGMMA autotune configs,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,125277,184343,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #184343 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",16f22039483c09e37ebb93d8e8b345f64ab5cce88c772a3af450be47c996a70b
+BUNDLE-551,bundle:bundle-551,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184323,Share foreach combo kernel bodies,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,127863,184323,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #184323 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a21dd15e2637ea283ee52c0550c8777a7e7bda9604b1c87b56582bb773218fc0
+BUNDLE-552,bundle:bundle-552,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: floatx (formerly float8) (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184319,[inductor] Align split reductions for tiled pointwise fusion,module: floatx (formerly float8),Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,128063,184319,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #184319 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8).",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1bce3108be86210ec94296ce1d61efb45228f56ddf334de91c1e83f0b85f7181
+BUNDLE-553,bundle:bundle-553,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184294,Avoid unused storage size guards for indexing,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,135492,184294,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #184294 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a37aa525d1ddab525ce911a938a07c72a01f84de4c6f7cae5696b33d7afc2d49
+BUNDLE-554,bundle:bundle-554,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184207,Release max autotune benchmark artifacts,module: inductor,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,140795,184207,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #184207 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7886909602979df26cab606108ffa985e6a4b81559f87dcd1ce125aea9998f72
+BUNDLE-555,bundle:bundle-555,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184189,Make generated Triton code use runtime device properties,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,141744,184189,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #184189 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3610ee4364b1ff43288efc2c908a82263f02a5465b8099bc927029ff45965dbe
+BUNDLE-556,bundle:bundle-556,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184119,Avoid fp8 bf16 prologue fusion on pre-sm90,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,150621,184119,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #184119 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-cuda13.0-py3.10-gcc11-sm100 / test (smoke_b200, 1, 1, linux.dgx.b200), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), +2 more.","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-cuda13.0-py3.10-gcc11-sm100 / test (smoke_b200, 1, 1, linux.dgx.b200), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), +2 more, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-cuda13.0-py3.10-gcc11-sm100 / test (smoke_b200, 1, 1, linux.dgx.b200), torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (induct...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f28122bbcb0c09b04609e457292d2f501227008a08d18f2bec863a54c5f6406b
+BUNDLE-557,bundle:bundle-557,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184103,Fix FakeTensorUpdater HOP dtype propagation,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,152548,184103,1,1,failed_ci_checks,"PR #184103 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), +1 more.","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), +1 more, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, torchtitan-x-pytorch-test / test-osdc (torchtitan_features_integration, 1, 1, mt-l-x86aavx2-189-704-a10g-8), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_torchbench, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor_timm, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (i...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0f48cbaf96156181d71e5121d93f83ed18160a5ddc47b506e6ab0a1bf51f024f
+BUNDLE-558,bundle:bundle-558,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184090,Preserve benchmark integer inputs for Inductor debug,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,154592,184090,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #184090 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e896019fc2382871e3cc6d726390588bf445764f1d8547a2c2eab81d01a78fac
+BUNDLE-559,bundle:bundle-559,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184086,Fix Inductor scaled_mm scale_result lowering,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,154807,184086,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #184086 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",bd8be59dcf9803bd82248b09c26d330d4c1018fec6b7650ba92d41f890968308
+BUNDLE-560,bundle:bundle-560,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184083,Preserve user Triton allocator in Inductor,module: inductor,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,155584,184083,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #184083 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9256603875df224c925388a261d7b9ba5208ebf1955808cbabb7fbedfb40fc8f
+BUNDLE-561,bundle:bundle-561,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184065,Fix static launcher 16-bit float scalars,module: inductor,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,158521,184065,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #184065 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2f4fd97ef690b91f5f442a5959bfd72f76521298b2efc529a499878ca2a1e992
+BUNDLE-562,bundle:bundle-562,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184061,Fix fused moving avg observer functional meta,module: inductor,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,159192,184061,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #184061 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",719c085bfbd11ac653bb26af3bdadd3c03d933f9a424366266689a166b283e1f
+BUNDLE-563,bundle:bundle-563,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184052,Preserve CIA ops in AOT joint export,module: inductor,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,160388,184052,1,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #184052 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a59cead8d24151d14cfad19908d12c5a429c8dd7e9f916590bee90866b4b228b
+BUNDLE-564,bundle:bundle-564,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,184047,Enable cooperative reductions by default,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,161138,184047,1,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #184047 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c22982a76b6fb576024b62341e7f46ba6eefeb25be00511ca05f8d399d796c51
+BUNDLE-565,bundle:bundle-565,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: cpu (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,181308,[CPU] Fix std_mean/var_mean all-reduce ~4x slower than std + mean (#122191),module: cpu,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,122191,181308,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #181308 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a170b46334dd6823f9b92f3e8272488e45638bc361ec2f7dcfe6fa5374e75e59
+BUNDLE-566,bundle:bundle-566,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: build (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,148674,Set /NODEFAULTLIB:vcomp for MSVC when linking caffe2::mkl with libiomp5md.lib,module: build,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,113490,148674,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #148674 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d4e26dad82c897e11737ae852b43c2a4b474c7933762f55020670e240ffc7fe0
+BUNDLE-567,bundle:bundle-567,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: cuda (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,127702,Define PY_SSIZE_T_CLEAN before #include <Python.h>,module: cuda,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,38019,127702,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #127702 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=92,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",991fc16c23ed773a28c7ec00794cc2cb787876285efa58e30988272f6f681864
+BUNDLE-568,bundle:bundle-568,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: sparse (4 issues + 1 PR),pr,84843,Support different NSE in batches of CSR and CSC tensors,module: sparse,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,"104193, 105319, 105329, 109946",84843,4,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #84843 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=939,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",95a5385c406f1ce04dac68d6e46719804cda1754cb86e1be78ab71f508bb7dc0
+BUNDLE-569,bundle:bundle-569,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: autograd (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,139524,Make anomaly mode asynchronous,module: autograd,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,143658,139524,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #139524 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=549,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0da497341366ba58882f0c82c59e13045dd7e5e93b00f0e2b1a8209204594721
+BUNDLE-570,bundle:bundle-570,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: nestedtensor (1 issue + 1 PR),pr,124624,[NJT] Allow construction of NJT within graph using offsets from inputs,module: nestedtensor,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,126472,124624,1,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #124624 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=695,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7795bb0f3910745d907875c473e2c96f9e6713739d53818bc8f1337aab10ca27
+BUNDLE-571,bundle:bundle-571,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189307,[CI/CD] Copy newer CUPTI headers into manywheel binary-build images,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"178106, 182068, 184631, 184648, 184822, 185227, 186927, 187501, 188237, 189307",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #185227 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1dc093f7b47aa8180eca25e402dcfcd30526363f31ea3cadaf073a388007f7df
+BUNDLE-572,bundle:bundle-572,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,186619,[pytorch] Fix Inductor missing wait on AsyncCollectiveTensor nested inside DTensor,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"171617, 178805, 179205, 179882, 182414, 184334, 185579, 185727, 186061, 186619",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #186619 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5dcb2fa416a793036d38aabc38d61cf388dbaa13bb21544582ea3ec122aaf491
+BUNDLE-573,bundle:bundle-573,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,187661,Return empty result for FFT with empty batch on MKL backend,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"170538, 178209, 179404, 179627, 180162, 184968, 185122, 187169, 187405, 187661",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #187661 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1572b8fa7e01e0b1749a57595b27a5b58801cca51e16c97b652f98bcdf3f2d69
+BUNDLE-574,bundle:bundle-574,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,187250,Support NumPy 2 __array__ copy kwarg and __array_wrap__ context on Tensor,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"175526, 178584, 180315, 180557, 180782, 180783, 181252, 181481, 183525, 187250",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #187250 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8c1761a6f7a66206cde117fb591179e09ed0e8b9dafe73262f22592e02321d4b
+BUNDLE-575,bundle:bundle-575,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,187871,Fix scaled_dot_product_attention: explicitly check for both attn_mask…,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"175246, 179592, 180561, 181475, 181561, 183509, 184986, 185177, 186178, 187871",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #187871 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",353e2bbfbf5c069e2b85f64a4b10b4ed274b58b7e809d9c108c10dce0e1d2b4e
+BUNDLE-576,bundle:bundle-576,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188549,[AI Codemod][PerfAICT-General] Vectorize index_select bounds check via fused unsigned compare (#188549),general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"169798, 187207, 187786, 187927, 188314, 188320, 188380, 188410, 188511, 188549",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #188549 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",25aaffd7fa0275a21d8223ec1e11decaca34ca9bc830d7c6ee92ec4ecfbedb0b
+BUNDLE-577,bundle:bundle-577,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188394,Speed up CPU quantile/nanquantile with partial selection,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"176084, 179619, 181571, 181582, 182092, 186127, 187653, 187714, 188291, 188394",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #188394 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0a549c566bb119ece21e089e76b809ea639d761483ba982ef67eb0f7615278a7
+BUNDLE-578,bundle:bundle-578,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189193,[XCCL] Allow XCCL to be set as default in `_new_process_group_helper`,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"175081, 181559, 184133, 187664, 188328, 188401, 188853, 188859, 188902, 189193",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #189193 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0c1acf09f086320db7a3e4728994941448b14c773f16efa0339395b850a9c1c7
+BUNDLE-579,bundle:bundle-579,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,184151,[CUDA] Fix float32 std/var M2 overflow by using double accumulation,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"155672, 180501, 181060, 182406, 183087, 183922, 184151, 184254, 184509, 185097",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #184151 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",352a466a8603377bb3eed8493256096c5f8a383360bba55650325d2fcb22e89f
+BUNDLE-580,bundle:bundle-580,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,186131,Migrate ProcessGroup method usages to the _single names,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"181087, 182256, 182655, 184192, 184657, 185592, 185646, 185689, 186130, 186131",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #186131 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e4f57e80f42105271764d81151fdc3bf10a08cf9455712bc493d5b40758c2cdd
+BUNDLE-581,bundle:bundle-581,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,186389,[BE][Ez]: Update string_util APIs to use std::string_view more,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"177263, 180081, 183847, 184315, 185956, 186048, 186218, 186253, 186334, 186389",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #186389 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",fb7b8b0af88832b74895395a42e2ff11cb6bcfff4b371cdc60ffb5909c2985f8
+BUNDLE-582,bundle:bundle-582,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,186949,Fix for scan autograd issue,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"175468, 176600, 179257, 179400, 182013, 184825, 186139, 186634, 186636, 186949",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #186636 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",37a29da2f11c90611ba78a0cde83f4516081b160a9f28f269207820a7b2e51c0
+BUNDLE-583,bundle:bundle-583,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,186848,Use C++20 concepts (1 of N),general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"171445, 177618, 177619, 182526, 183617, 185053, 185261, 185859, 185958, 186848",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #186848 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",bb1f67e25b862010c948551214b46df0f5670210114e41cc138195d4b2d2486a
+BUNDLE-584,bundle:bundle-584,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,187168,Fix accuracy degradation for baddbmm on CPU for float tensors,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"171219, 178014, 179642, 180167, 180183, 180274, 185875, 187069, 187142, 187168",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #187168 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",25215e3b3c526171a278a97fe623fe685a703eba2f3b7735ed86aa877250767e
+BUNDLE-585,bundle:bundle-585,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,187369,[Test] Add test hardware classification for test_complex.py and test_kernel_launch_checks.py,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"171023, 171178, 171338, 178167, 179127, 180442, 180722, 181570, 186762, 187369",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #187369 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c6a067959bebfb3bcf6b434dff2679e97b18f5969e6220a2e8d065bd221cbd57
+BUNDLE-586,bundle:bundle-586,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,187545,[BE] Use `std::numbers` in `c10/util/MathConstants.h`,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"174940, 178804, 178812, 180181, 182038, 184404, 185173, 186844, 187419, 187545",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #187545 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",530023f7f28f928814d0d400fedfccee36b2937b19185401c4ea52125d599545
+BUNDLE-587,bundle:bundle-587,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,186332,Improved common device test module for xpu,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"170679, 174395, 178800, 180665, 180947, 181023, 181221, 181905, 181907, 186332",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #186332 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b81336e57099920809b0f25fad3c76975b5314921056996201c4d9795370eaee
+BUNDLE-588,bundle:bundle-588,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,187809,Make DTensor logging and export tests accelerator-agnostic,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"184824, 184924, 186655, 187357, 187517, 187518, 187519, 187520, 187548, 187809",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #187809 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c9a2dadf538061d6ca07d2d8e095978d872742e35d666715871760222e3f0876
+BUNDLE-589,bundle:bundle-589,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188188,[DTensor] local_map normalizes shard dim checking in_placements,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"175242, 181396, 184867, 186414, 186600, 186946, 186947, 187619, 188094, 188188",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #188188 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",67302e2b4641dd8c7375463964938e67cfc1a300f518f21608dfe1ad33bf30f5
+BUNDLE-590,bundle:bundle-590,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188298,[aot_autograd] Add PySourceBuilder for runtime-wrapper codegen,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"180990, 181307, 181414, 186129, 186877, 187784, 188093, 188215, 188289, 188298",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #188298 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",aca475896b016ab1ff86d98b1992ec7a200f6a6ba820a94930a6c4e125eaf5d6
+BUNDLE-591,bundle:bundle-591,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188063,Enable Blackwell FP8 grouped GEMM,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"174771, 178751, 181530, 181623, 181724, 181767, 182948, 187390, 187875, 188063",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #188063 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ba6be3ecb3bf8336bb4d28822c56c810d09b2b3d3ac7690e500c55b67112d99f
+BUNDLE-592,bundle:bundle-592,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188444,[Test] Refactor tensor_creation_ops and foreach.py to be device-agnostic.,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"173914, 175809, 177924, 178283, 178906, 187150, 187711, 187922, 188340, 188444",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #188444 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7b1ca157b002a0c81289ab0ff5eb4ac847a901e73b3f40eb13665772b1767ed9
+BUNDLE-593,bundle:bundle-593,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188532,Fix/threshold inplace validation,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"188294, 188295, 188296, 188341, 188385, 188465, 188498, 188499, 188501, 188532",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #188532 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e58578360c45ca2f872470d1466aec5617612a13b1f92517d1c320dd0827da54
+BUNDLE-594,bundle:bundle-594,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188616,[AI Codemod][PerfAICT-General] Skip per-operand has_storage scan for non-PrivateUse1 devices in build,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"175011, 175472, 178710, 180907, 182051, 182920, 182986, 185115, 188535, 188616",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #188616 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",cef27409c8a1dbffbc4ebbbc7f239d0aa96e68694dfbe6b4e5b9e0a3cd464ad7
+BUNDLE-595,bundle:bundle-595,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188827,[AI Codemod][PerfAICT-General] Use SymDimVector to avoid heap allocs in select_symint,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"173390, 174323, 179224, 181041, 186599, 187860, 188439, 188502, 188826, 188827",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #188827 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",089c4d63b13169aa4accb3c30be2bbea7ed19860bcce8bbc60e0a3ba08a9c7cf
+BUNDLE-596,bundle:bundle-596,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188789,[xpu] Add IPC memory handle sharing support to XPUCachingAllocator,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"176239, 182146, 182362, 182529, 183306, 183323, 185113, 185114, 187691, 188789",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #188789 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8b1b6450b322c647834e6096678017f400a78f0816c00b81aca73b52964f339b
+BUNDLE-597,bundle:bundle-597,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188517,Fix/180346 dtensor clip grad mixed mesh,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"180885, 181743, 182134, 182138, 182530, 182727, 182729, 187732, 188516, 188517",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #188517 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b363bd9f7a37299fdc861a3c67c4da76e279de9f01daa3f2eb0717c76562482e
+BUNDLE-598,bundle:bundle-598,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189062,[profiler][cupti] Make CUPTI monitor buffer_size / flush_period_s config-only,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"182183, 183705, 183759, 185109, 187007, 187015, 187778, 187891, 188571, 189062",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #189062 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",832dd5b0c47cafbeeacea71f043235d71f20d076fd2cb2eec4c43aacf55f052a
+BUNDLE-599,bundle:bundle-599,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189005,fix(fx): filter internal frames in record_stack_traces to resolve broken stack traces (#130861),general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"165766, 183620, 187009, 187131, 187132, 187133, 188276, 188766, 188979, 189005",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #189005 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2883d83cc11f3369804a24838600d6444496c1d69efecbe9f8d70194391140d4
+BUNDLE-600,bundle:bundle-600,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189328,Add retry with backoff to download_mnist.py,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"179651, 187288, 187931, 188262, 189083, 189111, 189185, 189217, 189318, 189328",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #189318 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4afe3740e1ecf966108c8d6596d6a777965aad94dd04015de7b1b3e12e888952
+BUNDLE-601,bundle:bundle-601,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189277,Skip redundant contiguity rescan in empty_tensor_restride (robust) (#189277),general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"115316, 186055, 187465, 187699, 188621, 189088, 189153, 189192, 189220, 189277",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #189277 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9740ca2098215e1bde1789e597befa8837df8936e54d7376ea983e06b6e9b210
+BUNDLE-602,bundle:bundle-602,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189289,[TEST] Refactor test_c10d_pypg.py with hw_classification,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"106149, 177757, 183910, 185251, 186056, 187307, 189131, 189246, 189247, 189289",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #189289 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b16c51eea03095674c287ffae7444f8be9d7b480512eb6f41355e5a7876421c8
+BUNDLE-603,bundle:bundle-603,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189276,Update third_party/kineto submodule to cb6e5f7,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"174699, 180707, 185308, 187508, 188253, 188650, 188736, 189103, 189178, 189276",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #189276 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",fe69e0ef44c2ebee791565f58d0bb1821808f2d52c87611fed1f050acc170858
+BUNDLE-604,bundle:bundle-604,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188894,Fix HAS_XPU_AND_TRITON to require triton XPU backend,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"112441, 148668, 160182, 160638, 160872, 160878, 164128, 179443, 182768, 188894",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #188894 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",83426da399d63ef4458552d6592d4972e2f1e343f163b8a4a842fd2a6ced59f0
+BUNDLE-605,bundle:bundle-605,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,183105,Fix formatting in extensions.json,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"140613, 161254, 170249, 170250, 178245, 181359, 181435, 182900, 183035, 183105",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #183105 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a2d575e0d91573ee8f591298af665f641201df4d36ed891b5da506d627968268
+BUNDLE-606,bundle:bundle-606,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,183747,Adding new test_c10d_ops_privateuse1.py variant for distributed testing,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"177726, 179139, 179863, 182179, 182274, 182398, 182846, 183262, 183418, 183747",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #183747 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5d8fa6b658c9ee6816e9b808aecebb184443f77bc9398aff4b6fc3b828157bf4
+BUNDLE-607,bundle:bundle-607,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,183993,"Back out ""Port D104346887/PR 182675 for index large select""",general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"88221, 176857, 182730, 183394, 183455, 183651, 183940, 183941, 183953, 183993",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #183993 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1a744fbdb4828cbd5f84f3e9e3383eb713d48b9ca06e179197edaadea524481c
+BUNDLE-608,bundle:bundle-608,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,184674,fixup! Add CPython Dynamo agentic loop plan,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"178176, 179538, 184257, 184300, 184483, 184489, 184536, 184674, 185253, 185285",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #184674 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",48e6df7e0cfef3c848d87fd822bac55a0d83bbc8424867bffd75866f960efe03
+BUNDLE-609,bundle:bundle-609,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,185835,[c10d] Add delegate backend to FakeProcessGroup for numerics testing,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"159718, 185172, 185339, 185340, 185363, 185364, 185376, 185548, 185565, 185835",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #185835 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",32a4d1e43a1d91170d051f459988893cb7c42c4010e1b0f25ddb75beaaa1a1da
+BUNDLE-610,bundle:bundle-610,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,186541,[MPS] [WIP] Port all MPSGraph matmuls to Metal,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"177471, 178277, 185286, 185555, 185787, 185822, 185935, 185936, 186002, 186541",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #186541 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",65edae75d3768a29299c2c11a99da24784bb01a52da0c9e087207e7cf8c4b53f
+BUNDLE-611,bundle:bundle-611,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,186343,Enable FA build for SDPA on Windows+CUDA,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"177438, 180192, 180407, 180410, 180411, 180412, 180597, 183579, 185612, 186343",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #186343 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ed0b533b881658c5f1714524adee678cdbf908dbb4907aa8fc6def07faa51584
+BUNDLE-612,bundle:bundle-612,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,187640,Support in-tree XNNPACK build on Windows ARM64,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"177648, 180423, 180925, 186984, 186986, 186987, 186988, 187479, 187624, 187640",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #187640 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",21a035ccd0354b8be5af1697497ebdfa593f17730b115e99d8595a4078a2a0ab
+BUNDLE-613,bundle:bundle-613,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188003,[AMD][hipBLASLt] Enable streak-K work stealing for GEMM operations,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"180866, 180867, 180924, 180933, 181047, 181278, 186033, 187756, 187892, 188003",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #188003 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d9fc38c16a472d7b705e85d75c5d96ee82f59ff9cf29975e45d17e1642f2e161
+BUNDLE-614,bundle:bundle-614,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188464,[spmd_types] infer R@FSDP axes from active mesh for empty params,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"178862, 181199, 181269, 181664, 182271, 186271, 187981, 188189, 188463, 188464",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #188464 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b37ffe124dbbe0be5ad42eb39a803e11bfddb3dbdfe315abe321d62a935e1361
+BUNDLE-615,bundle:bundle-615,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188629,docs: document S3-compatible object storage for distributed checkpoint,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"181678, 181956, 187206, 187878, 187900, 187909, 188284, 188448, 188592, 188629",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #188629 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b588bc078f98ca339740465b17e6cbf52fdb8001132100a1a6bd196175c99b58
+BUNDLE-616,bundle:bundle-616,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188858,[DO NOT MERGE] Complex Wrapper Test,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"181412, 182143, 182226, 182314, 182387, 182388, 182389, 182415, 188577, 188858",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #188858 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",81642ad1ebdad6735dbdb5c46433ca3bbf339b4ffc09abcf6b72ed3921df484a
+BUNDLE-617,bundle:bundle-617,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189128,Gil acquire bool conversion,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"174503, 181205, 181215, 182844, 182864, 187650, 189068, 189069, 189070, 189128",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #189070 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2caf599755c7611cbdcfa9b628871b140afb054b1174b3350cc345af5e4e69b8
+BUNDLE-618,bundle:bundle-618,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189329,[DEBUG] Profile the XPU SYCL device-link bottleneck,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"179094, 188016, 189071, 189072, 189073, 189074, 189237, 189275, 189299, 189329",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #189299 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5f212a0bd87583ede92d349927f7f3e16d29676493bd7ed033203a121acb5cc5
+BUNDLE-619,bundle:bundle-619,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189250,[Test][Refactor] Decouple test_dataloader and test_comparison_utils according to the accelerator relevance.,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"172109, 180874, 181306, 183054, 183452, 188539, 189203, 189205, 189240, 189250",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #189205 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",72f2b3cda224aaac1de72290f9a6aa1b9d4efbdc112f8f8a28926229807b7a64
+BUNDLE-620,bundle:bundle-620,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,184949,Remove allow-untyped-defs from pyi files,general,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"177605, 178412, 178628, 180904, 183479, 183612, 183797, 183925, 183966, 184949",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #184949 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",dac2d7b9438aee57ad3ff8e6fa73fd5444e41fa3c2863fd578f2b3fa4ce81dae
+BUNDLE-621,bundle:bundle-621,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: accelerator (0 issues + 2 PRs),pr,185973,[Accelerator] Enable Default Stream API,module: accelerator,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"185973, 187205",0,2,failed_ci_checks,PR #185973 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",54724814d1746638363339bb3f52558766f9aff73cac0b743180ec66b89fa33c
+BUNDLE-622,bundle:bundle-622,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: amp (automated mixed precision) (0 issues + 7 PRs),pr,188130,[Test] Make test_autocast device-agnostic for Out-of-Tree backends,module: amp (automated mixed precision),"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"185668, 185705, 185830, 185918, 186815, 186816, 188130",0,7,failed_ci_checks,PR #188130 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e5fe6c60d14c49a2381eddba5c35b0e480a431525876cadd1e8e690014aa0545
+BUNDLE-623,bundle:bundle-623,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: aotdispatch (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,177690,"DO NOT MERGE Default pre_grad_pass_timing to ""late"" in fbcode",module: aotdispatch,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,177690,0,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #177690 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",60a049b70c2f9b35d06a3dc9a96ba094da2fcfb6ef899bdaa8d1a92d394718d0
+BUNDLE-624,bundle:bundle-624,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: aotinductor (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,186926,Remove sleef from test_aoti_abi_check linkage,module: aotinductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,186926,0,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186926 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b52a0fda3c3797ca37ddd990d8f3a431772ec006d531718fd713fff4b9c43433
+BUNDLE-625,bundle:bundle-625,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: arm (0 issues + 3 PRs),pr,169937,Fix vectorized float32 to uint8 conversion on AArch64,module: arm,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"169937, 176293, 188000",0,3,failed_ci_checks,PR #169937 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",01449a4a52d88a873452a2e2117886b3b06a539a2505428bf5570bc58a2e64bb
+BUNDLE-626,bundle:bundle-626,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: autograd (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,178500,[autograd] Support Mapping and OrderedDict inputs for autograd.grad and autograd.backward,module: autograd,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,178500,0,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #178500 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",090dd8d9772c4e93e17a481cd244e01a76e1b156581c84f9c301ed7036d1c126
+BUNDLE-627,bundle:bundle-627,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: bc-breaking (0 issues + 3 PRs),pr,177170,[FSDP] Fix alias annotation for fsdp::all_gather_copy_in,module: bc-breaking,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"177115, 177170, 177287",0,3,failed_ci_checks,PR #177170 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d1153546e3a79fdec85b7511ab539eea8f170221b90740c4eaa4edf58694bd46
+BUNDLE-628,bundle:bundle-628,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: compiled autograd (0 issues + 7 PRs),pr,183776,C++ FakeTensor,module: compiled autograd,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"178416, 179436, 181904, 182781, 183086, 183776, 184464",0,7,failed_ci_checks,PR #183776 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9d0d68e8dbd73767830a4b721b3b374e10aa7a240126fa6ec8f1945aae381049
+BUNDLE-629,bundle:bundle-629,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: convolution (0 issues + 2 PRs),pr,188426,Fix incorrect CPU bf16 conv3d when innermost output dim is 1 and strided,module: convolution,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"176894, 188426",0,2,failed_ci_checks,PR #188426 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ce61699fa6fea717ce5f46b8cb90384fc7100650f80ffde6be6d5f1b0e1702e7
+BUNDLE-630,bundle:bundle-630,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: core aten (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,186653,Make topk deterministic under deterministic algorithms,module: core aten,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,186653,0,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186653 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9220634afa68b262f3f7450e11e7d5d911f98418011159eec5af0c5abf84ba98
+BUNDLE-631,bundle:bundle-631,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: cpu (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,184420,"Fix pow(-0.0, +/-0.5) sign on sqrt/rsqrt shortcut",module: cpu,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"170609, 175746, 175758, 178242, 178664, 181906, 184420, 185606, 185932, 187002",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #184420 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e1a01b5e2add43e786bc19efe345a204de0c4390ab4cd05dee39de802d82885a
+BUNDLE-632,bundle:bundle-632,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: cpu (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188563,[AI Codemod][PerfAICT-General] Enable auto-vectorization of at::vec::convert via __restrict and indexed access,module: cpu,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"180455, 182011, 185491, 187208, 187712, 187897, 188311, 188312, 188451, 188563",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #188563 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d410c88bb9e47fcd16e9c64865d9a54d97aac507301b7034f5069567e9118a8a
+BUNDLE-633,bundle:bundle-633,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: cpu (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189044,[inductor] Handle symbolic float scalars in FX wrapper metadata hook and reference analysis (#189044),module: cpu,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"133289, 133297, 176574, 177867, 183254, 183550, 183909, 186790, 187490, 189044",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #189044 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d80b82965203cc652a17c9f0a879811361cbae24047ab0bc55af2ce2f50dcafc
+BUNDLE-634,bundle:bundle-634,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: cpu (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,184307,Update SDPA error diagnostics,module: cpu,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"177401, 178485, 179397, 181077, 182845, 183978, 184307, 185706, 186590, 187116",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #184307 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",77a1b8edf08da1941c6ca91d1e86844c2dbbe953ee7ac5e31b142077b129de2d
+BUNDLE-635,bundle:bundle-635,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: cpu (0 issues + 5 PRs),pr,184892,xpu: use stride-based conv descriptors and preserve grouped layout mapping,module: cpu,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"177612, 178354, 180186, 180409, 184892",0,5,failed_ci_checks,PR #184892 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f754df8222ea33393670966374260153185f5cf6b4151df7027ba24c505ab5a2
+BUNDLE-636,bundle:bundle-636,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: cublas (0 issues + 4 PRs),pr,189312,[CUDA][cuBLAS] Change cuBLAS default workspace size for SM 11.0 to 32 MiB,module: cublas,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"170571, 180875, 181944, 189312",0,4,failed_ci_checks,PR #181944 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",042d2537964c9fdc7b6c0749339db17cfdbda3c1402a899367e4c6a19b2719d3
+BUNDLE-637,bundle:bundle-637,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: cuda (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188115,[Inductor][TEST] Align `test_main_loop_scaling` with H100 support surface,module: cuda,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"176657, 176670, 176754, 179820, 180641, 182074, 182216, 188115, 188165, 189202",0,10,failed_static_checks,"PR #188115 is blocked by failing static/type checks: statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-aarch64-py3.10 / build-osdc, linux-jammy-cuda13.0-py3.10-gcc11-sm90 / test-osdc (smoke, 1, 1, mt-l-x86iamx-22-225-h100), linux-jammy-cuda13.0-py3.12-gcc11-sm100 / test-osdc (smoke_b200, 1, 1, mt-l-x86iamx-22-225-b200), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), +5 more.","Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-aarch64-py3.10 / build-osdc, linux-jammy-cuda13.0-py3.10-gcc11-sm90 / test-osdc (smoke, 1, 1, mt-l-x86iamx-22-225-h100), linux-jammy-cuda13.0-py3.12-gcc11-sm100 / test-osdc (smoke_b200, 1, 1, mt-l-x86iamx-22-225-b200), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), +5 more, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,"failed checks: statusCheckRollup, linux-jammy-aarch64-py3.10 / build-osdc, linux-jammy-cuda13.0-py3.10-gcc11-sm90 / test-osdc (smoke, 1, 1, mt-l-x86iamx-22-225-h100), linux-jammy-cuda13.0-py3.12-gcc11-sm100 / test-osdc (smoke_b200, 1, 1, mt-l-x86iamx-22-225-b200), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 1, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-29-113-a10g), unit-test / inductor-test / test-osdc (inductor, 2, 2, mt-l-x86aavx2-...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",86fd202768204da74272af167d8166d7451a6c61d12d24c50f783ef0edd788d8
+BUNDLE-638,bundle:bundle-638,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dataloader (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,166732,Introducing statefulness for single process dataloader,module: dataloader,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,166732,0,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #166732 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ca96e0fb06b5ba10f22a7c2ba35ee2b0a4c098ff5e6cbd523a0ec35a89decd7f
+BUNDLE-639,bundle:bundle-639,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: docs (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,170807,Adding Glossary,module: docs,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,170807,0,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #170807 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup. Review signal: @pytorchbot rebase,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",86704e7cdd0b07242d3081a07ce1e4a339f7530fbede215ce5721ceecee86a24
+BUNDLE-640,bundle:bundle-640,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,135631,[scan] Autograd,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"135631, 176295, 179584, 179658, 180570, 181915, 184696, 185316, 186085, 187726",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #187726 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b557567f01bfced262632eda1eb19d90f0855cd64b8d026e7f54a6a795546875
+BUNDLE-641,bundle:bundle-641,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,187032,[dynamo] Support member access on protobuf enums,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"169241, 175082, 175947, 176044, 184704, 185661, 185738, 185911, 186532, 187032",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #187032 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",17196342124b5d76ec345c36fc0e433c478b088bc8fd0a2d7d9f9f2bc663fb2d
+BUNDLE-642,bundle:bundle-642,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188406,[dynamo] preserve Stream/Event subclass type across graph-break rec…,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"185791, 186294, 186306, 186330, 186479, 186874, 187596, 187782, 188286, 188406",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #188406 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",92d4a3f183109dfb1cede8810f04dfdd9309d3d3b0d846d19d74db1a62d2efa8
+BUNDLE-643,bundle:bundle-643,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188978,"swap isinstance(t, FakeTensor) to is_fake",module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"160883, 173459, 177511, 178314, 179376, 180118, 180602, 184607, 184705, 188978",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #188978 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b0fe48dbada4d4b6a122e25500b3469bffc9c12da9a041aa30a07e925a43c5d3
+BUNDLE-644,bundle:bundle-644,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,186831,Improve cudagraph stack trace coverage and assertions,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"170567, 176989, 177283, 185432, 186086, 186304, 186458, 186586, 186830, 186831",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #186831 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c4e242f4b4435aabfbec541c71074c3f5333f3b293744d5f7e00039cebfea16d
+BUNDLE-645,bundle:bundle-645,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,187430,Add Kaiser-Bessel Derived window,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"113258, 178083, 179587, 180528, 184487, 185101, 185236, 186828, 187391, 187430",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #187430 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",666be1a59b991d7be3e35e6cfc5646d1a0c361da7aa01b64ae4f802773ec3529
+BUNDLE-646,bundle:bundle-646,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,187823,Fix regex for extracting gist URLs from logs,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"180529, 180535, 181150, 181167, 185213, 186137, 186777, 187134, 187529, 187823",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #187823 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",dd35b70886b7690441c0c69394141fa5962d8599e9411ac63301fb8a93e93f62
+BUNDLE-647,bundle:bundle-647,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188103,Enable recursive dict-tag guard optimization by default on 3.12+ non-free-threaded,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"181398, 182851, 184568, 186243, 186771, 186899, 187692, 187832, 188101, 188103",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #188103 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",027a80dde6dcfbbc0d51c3ed1230c0d133c0dd0a1a3fe3c2a556153b73829f9a
+BUNDLE-648,bundle:bundle-648,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188745,"[dynamo, nested graph breaks] fix empty nn.Module hook dict reconstruction",module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"170396, 186902, 186906, 186968, 187061, 187876, 187938, 188581, 188744, 188745",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #188745 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7f25182a2f999791e75e7323890d271aca8dc666c4922e7d7f39b59369320952
+BUNDLE-649,bundle:bundle-649,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189325,[Dynamo] Fix self-referential bw_compiler on backend re-entry,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"180283, 181780, 181781, 184218, 189024, 189027, 189051, 189249, 189311, 189325",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #189311 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",40197d88bb9e23ddc73ec07239ac280bf110723b35ba3315668008fbced758fc
+BUNDLE-650,bundle:bundle-650,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189206,[Inductor] register `target_code` in `input_codes` tracker,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"157149, 184365, 185220, 186915, 187690, 187744, 188181, 188824, 189042, 189206",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #189206 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",695d00130d2553a59f7ee97e6821900f0b2f430c48baee7a42c33528b8d9e403
+BUNDLE-651,bundle:bundle-651,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188995,[dynamo] Allow raw unbacked SymInts in strict mode (FlexAttention BlockMask) (#187547),module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"160888, 177205, 179625, 180379, 183404, 187883, 188037, 188350, 188993, 188995",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #188350 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2ff8acfc643a6a7204d26442affadfad82808039362fd6cbd963a16a9c906b5b
+BUNDLE-652,bundle:bundle-652,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,184801,Gate baddbmm expectedFailureDynamic on TEST_Z3,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"179096, 181281, 181337, 181338, 182196, 182598, 184401, 184617, 184755, 184801",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #184801 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8b2cce39fe46097db88adec166a013936f61881de37a9eb5ff21fd7759d65fd8
+BUNDLE-653,bundle:bundle-653,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,184766,Fix Dynamo set discard and remove semantics,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"184616, 184635, 184754, 184757, 184759, 184761, 184762, 184763, 184765, 184766",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #184766 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d4f1b48d81d373c189de16724305c29928abde6d3ae60cbc1d26845ab846188b
+BUNDLE-654,bundle:bundle-654,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,184764,Fix Dynamo iterator reduce semantics,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"184622, 184627, 184645, 184669, 184670, 184671, 184672, 184673, 184760, 184764",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #184764 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ba32b13f7a47462606fde5e692c79e8b32d10b17d03fe3a483a7ac7140a6fc53
+BUNDLE-655,bundle:bundle-655,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,184758,Fix Dynamo defaultdict shallow copy semantics,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"181578, 183029, 184756, 184758, 185218, 185284, 185287, 185712, 185713, 186378",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #184758 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8bd336a81aa8c96c7bf0c5c56737746d9bd8c83c3e3c13085c00cdf4ec13668e
+BUNDLE-656,bundle:bundle-656,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,187674,Preserve boxed lifetimes for regional compiled calls,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"179675, 180207, 186277, 186382, 186753, 187004, 187249, 187435, 187472, 187674",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #187674 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",48fa271ac2a1c7de1c253670ca5ce9b5f06b988fe031d7ef19acf447fe430b1a
+BUNDLE-657,bundle:bundle-657,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188326,feat(dynamo): backport recursive dict tags,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"177038, 180986, 181189, 181392, 181443, 181444, 186945, 187882, 188259, 188326",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #187882 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3d2e5956a6d41d01651622b895aea1c2fd0f1fcc5ab504f2dd8d995f1f5044bb
+BUNDLE-658,bundle:bundle-658,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189320,[inductor] Enable nested Inductor configs for invoke_subgraph regions,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"178393, 181324, 183264, 188435, 188963, 189198, 189216, 189218, 189229, 189320",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #189229 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1051e93f84b7dfc4f4d0e779d0f07cff8607f12aedabfc6ee7db5b32c83034f2
+BUNDLE-659,bundle:bundle-659,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: dynamo (0 issues + 4 PRs),pr,184440,[dynamic_spec]Add optimizer to ease user's dynamic_spec adoption,module: dynamo,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"166063, 182779, 183361, 184440",0,4,failed_ci_checks,PR #184440 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",05ab9c9e4f0ad43d69c148025d2401696f2636c2621ac6154e255647dabfde18
+BUNDLE-660,bundle:bundle-660,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: flex attention (0 issues + 2 PRs),pr,186880,Add FlexAttention shared memory compile hints,module: flex attention,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"186880, 188178",0,2,failed_ci_checks,PR #186880 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c2aed1929cf4fde6ea810d7e9399122113792c7c3b4583aec0d12b01a7ebb7a0
+BUNDLE-661,bundle:bundle-661,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: functionalization (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,184409,Fix local_map deferred inlining to functionalize mutable operations,module: functionalization,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,184409,0,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #184409 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",071d100fe9289ada90eea0b725ce7abc9612ce38f2bbfc65da6e72809357c822
+BUNDLE-662,bundle:bundle-662,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188301,[inductor] Fix inductor dropping ordering dep between effectful ops with different kernel types,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"174241, 177546, 184164, 184459, 185518, 185834, 185838, 185842, 185851, 188301",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #185851 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3f14d59d7b01740e725dd17787e21eb92d01dce8543f55466e6680b6ba3b6e21
+BUNDLE-663,bundle:bundle-663,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,186573,[Inductor] Stabilize checkpointed reduction autotuning,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"179526, 180737, 180810, 180971, 182431, 184114, 184143, 184155, 185578, 186573",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #186573 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",12d5aa42e336341d8f4d77501fbb1d038a91c94651c69815993397a01e309aac
+BUNDLE-664,bundle:bundle-664,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188368,[Inductor] Fix ValueRangeError in Inductor for zero-iteration loops,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"179235, 180319, 181546, 182342, 185077, 185988, 186049, 186779, 187368, 188368",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #188368 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",75bdc5be5f28505fbefad5a955411e01743a12531f6faafbd80c278cb580a076
+BUNDLE-665,bundle:bundle-665,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189191,Cuda Graph Default Enable (#189191),module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"175566, 183681, 184305, 186319, 186336, 188337, 188357, 188466, 188521, 189191",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #189191 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",814c6001d32d847421e5232c693b854321aaf15afa3ea5ae4c3d9330d439249c
+BUNDLE-666,bundle:bundle-666,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,184279,Avoid MultiOutput for single-output fallback kernels,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"177568, 179547, 181074, 182055, 183854, 184279, 184587, 185091, 185570, 185844",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #184279 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",19f3bad9cce04669c967ba9936cf4bce3ed24742c6ad3575d448d2d542341a40
+BUNDLE-667,bundle:bundle-667,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,186829,Auto-promote CUDA graph static input copies,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"181188, 184226, 184965, 185183, 186020, 186095, 186106, 186608, 186609, 186829",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #186829 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",baf81cf31515f7b089f2c577444fefc8708f1a6eaf35b7a53ff779f482d29218
+BUNDLE-668,bundle:bundle-668,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,186882,RFC Change error order,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"175450, 177854, 178300, 179142, 179548, 181007, 181748, 182963, 182964, 186882",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #186882 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ffe54b02363623f5c24d0669473347e8fd1721cf3879c6b0b32ee649a54aa50b
+BUNDLE-669,bundle:bundle-669,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,186190,[spmd_types] typecheck FlexAttention,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"174409, 175584, 178922, 179699, 183638, 186096, 186097, 186101, 186102, 186190",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #186190 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6d6fa7fd0b1569534e12659408aa00a237a46d0f8369165b8ea8b56db72bdee6
+BUNDLE-670,bundle:bundle-670,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,187062,[inductor] Expose compile_worker_malloc_conf to tune the compile-worker allocator (#187062),module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"175914, 177087, 178150, 178338, 179702, 180858, 180930, 181009, 181010, 187062",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #187062 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3066c3bcdd933908a200dc3b47508d87a9ffa0096d2176b645674457fa28a5b9
+BUNDLE-671,bundle:bundle-671,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,187965,[inductor] Avoid disjoint horizontal fusion when allow_peak_memory_increasing_fusion is off,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"181008, 181178, 181265, 181518, 182193, 183468, 187367, 187962, 187964, 187965",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #187965 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c72eacc0681d30224017a3295b70add848a367f63a44362408a8d4f2e7ec77ae
+BUNDLE-672,bundle:bundle-672,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188059,[inductor] Block only peak-crossing fusions in the peak-memory guards,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"176920, 180644, 186211, 187471, 187842, 188055, 188056, 188057, 188058, 188059",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #188059 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2870bafb2cd27c6cd5852383b1a37f8a9f0852a736d9ddb0c8a9f7aaf6c26878
+BUNDLE-673,bundle:bundle-673,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188771,[inductor] Rewind block_ptr across outer loop in nested reductions (#188771),module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"178318, 182310, 187224, 187550, 188161, 188179, 188180, 188339, 188646, 188771",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #188771 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0abf8408a4149429e22f1cd2f792838d8cbd8b3e1b491b04ee7d5c681c061ba7
+BUNDLE-674,bundle:bundle-674,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189107,Introduce Inductor lowering for _philox_uniform,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"152806, 180608, 182577, 184955, 186370, 187675, 187961, 188050, 188822, 189107",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #189107 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0f68ea5c6079c1e8ddc20916aa43c6b95bf6a001a842c0ecbd5772306eb5645b
+BUNDLE-675,bundle:bundle-675,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189316,flex_gemm: support mx block-scale stores,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"176876, 184946, 188597, 188643, 189095, 189195, 189305, 189314, 189315, 189316",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #189316 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",46eaf638d77db5eecda22807a4d2da2cc7686b69e116ba0859ce09d67c9ab092
+BUNDLE-676,bundle:bundle-676,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189257,[rocm] Re-enable conv2d backward parametrized test on ROCm by using fp16 on NAVI,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"175900, 183682, 183683, 183684, 184447, 185359, 188137, 189080, 189190, 189257",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #189257 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6b431dc55758d1fbb7eeab7524652f0617eddd41e9d557eb13bbfde64af6f7a8
+BUNDLE-677,bundle:bundle-677,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189197,make post-processing in codegen mandatory,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"165800, 180716, 181000, 181826, 186797, 187461, 188992, 189076, 189147, 189197",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #189197 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8d7854afb4d9932d0aa1ebbf490f249c17f33713b4ee053c80fb7e62a438a403
+BUNDLE-678,bundle:bundle-678,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,184389,[ROCm] Fix test_origami autotune comparison after PR #181617 cap,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"167894, 174893, 180545, 181617, 181909, 183384, 183611, 184194, 184236, 184389",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #184389 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9d1cc8c050d8be0e4dff98cca3d51aa99fd69fa5bcc8e82e3b8ca20aab76c21d
+BUNDLE-679,bundle:bundle-679,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,185044,[AI SLOP] Support SymInt list custom op returns,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"175969, 177445, 184302, 184812, 184813, 184909, 184991, 185044, 185219, 185457",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #185044 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",bd342c0e44fbd7384ca5e4d178801227d05a2e6ebaecacf8d29810e8fcb926c8
+BUNDLE-680,bundle:bundle-680,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,186798,[TESTING ONLY] [ROCm] testing heuristic config approach,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"179769, 180682, 180683, 180684, 182631, 183270, 183626, 186752, 186756, 186798",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #186798 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f62db8fd997e9ca5405f574d0a8eea279bf65675f27d578c85a78014d854209f
+BUNDLE-681,bundle:bundle-681,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,187846,[inductor] Pick low-pressure buffer reuse when allow_peak_memory_increasing_fusion is off,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"179149, 184886, 187258, 187636, 187815, 187839, 187840, 187841, 187843, 187846",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #187846 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5d9c9783d6f0d72376471078beb9d6e53b3237c06500fe1163b4839c8d01997e
+BUNDLE-682,bundle:bundle-682,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,187971,[inductor] Add strict_numerics config to emit INNER_TREE reduction ordering for sum,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"172682, 175486, 180754, 181449, 185258, 187606, 187818, 187844, 187845, 187971",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #187971 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a43435ff00431fe14064bb42c7934968a51dd2bdc04e2af1b6c45feb4744c984
+BUNDLE-683,bundle:bundle-683,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189003,[inductor] Coordinate-descent tune compile-time combo kernel blocks,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"181611, 182691, 187870, 188119, 188203, 188404, 188734, 188887, 189002, 189003",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #189003 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2771d961b1592fb8888ec09234b509751a0d6a56e809c447c33cec0e3be68740
+BUNDLE-684,bundle:bundle-684,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189321,[inductor] Enable per-region cudagraphs for invoke_subgraph via auto graph partition,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"177705, 181089, 182334, 188236, 188469, 188886, 189001, 189165, 189209, 189321",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #189209 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",bffe886953cf38263efc9cbc8aa1e4e34682c3244bbd2e5c47af93bbebf413ff
+BUNDLE-685,bundle:bundle-685,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,179175,[Inductor][NVGEMM] Fix FP4 autotuning tensor creation,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"178840, 179011, 179012, 179013, 179014, 179015, 179016, 179049, 179167, 179175",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #179175 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7a298cf6048836d535a40990d22ca126a24dabe1f8955c2b4b165459e4ec0ebd
+BUNDLE-686,bundle:bundle-686,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: inductor (0 issues + 6 PRs),pr,185012,[inductor] Add FP64-heavy pointwise autotune candidate,module: inductor,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"184930, 184933, 184937, 184999, 185011, 185012",0,6,failed_ci_checks,PR #185012 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",36fce20376099546a60b8bae2b169a187f4f84cadeb671da665cc7184d225ad5
+BUNDLE-687,bundle:bundle-687,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: linear algebra (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,57772,Deprecate torch.svd and change svd -> linalg_svd,module: linear algebra,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,57772,0,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #57772 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4eb4dd1e9bd3010fa2e855c8fdd418c521ef925c6c66a6c96e0dba599656f719
+BUNDLE-688,bundle:bundle-688,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: mkldnn (0 issues + 3 PRs),pr,188787,OneDNN 3.12.2 acceptance test,module: mkldnn,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"184873, 188136, 188787",0,3,failed_ci_checks,PR #188787 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",69121d0f2a9bc3c24285ebe9a904c196575cd2efab23a7b09db891b7abc5cb5c
+BUNDLE-689,bundle:bundle-689,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: mps (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,187797,Add linalg SVD operator benchmarks,module: mps,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,187797,0,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #187797 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f740927a9e13b97658321035fe600cf6469f71f60b0b9c1653dcf803e0c0f7c7
+BUNDLE-690,bundle:bundle-690,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: openreg (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,185700,[OpenReg] Add compiler integration doc for OOT accelerators,module: openreg,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,185700,0,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185700 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",cb73872a8512a9260392d2cecbf0c6b08c69474e83a3c6309df16d63fc6ebdd7
+BUNDLE-691,bundle:bundle-691,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: privateuse1 (0 issues + 6 PRs),pr,185882,[PrivateUse1] Return `False` instead of `None` when PU1 backend is not available,module: privateuse1,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"178336, 178360, 180050, 180083, 185358, 185882",0,6,failed_ci_checks,PR #185358 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",40d6e43a650c4830fa239159c8c26b2cb8bff8da98503463ba577f0d8c4ca6b6
+BUNDLE-692,bundle:bundle-692,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: rocm (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,185415,[ROCm] Fix LayerNorm backward kernel for AMD Strix Halo GPUs,module: rocm,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"178004, 183668, 184253, 185366, 185415, 185666, 186010, 186122, 187189, 188316",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #183668 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",340ab3d8d620e18e81d10371df397c35dda8a90ae1fcf234d154301ece1696c0
+BUNDLE-693,bundle:bundle-693,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: rocm (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189302,[ROCm][CI] Make ROCM_SO_FILES a single shared source of truth for wheel bundling + preload,module: rocm,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"180955, 181875, 182145, 183592, 187056, 187164, 188067, 189264, 189266, 189302",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #189302 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ae855e2c5b48cd14ec91e2cbed6fedc69628e9eb9f7675ca5cf611255b00445a
+BUNDLE-694,bundle:bundle-694,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: rocm (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188662,[ROCm] Updated mi300 runners to have 8 shards,module: rocm,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"181218, 181615, 181627, 181628, 187464, 187739, 188168, 188184, 188429, 188662",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #188662 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",17d0f9eada71d580749bff3b80b20725bf3bd696e722b1cefcb7d8ce52f8a2c5
+BUNDLE-695,bundle:bundle-695,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: rocm (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189301,[ROCm] Bump AOTriton to 0.13b,module: rocm,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"180891, 182810, 182921, 183374, 183456, 183613, 183798, 184962, 189084, 189301",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #189084 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",69d74b1276a67b1f53f3472abad5dafc55b586e78d835eaee1f08684acbd96d6
+BUNDLE-696,bundle:bundle-696,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: symm_mem (0 issues + 5 PRs),pr,187785,[TokenSwitch] Add symmetric-memory zero-copy dispatch/combine,module: symm_mem,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"183390, 187642, 187750, 187776, 187785",0,5,failed_ci_checks,PR #187785 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",22b27216ba959e34e95fe98de41303d7cd34b51116a04d5564b281b23461db3b
+BUNDLE-697,bundle:bundle-697,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: testing (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,186918,[Test] Add test hardware classification for test classes,module: testing,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,186918,0,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #186918 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",088b82afe88765c9206ac808c2407cb0c50c0ee4f97aa8d3ca461996cc8ac455
+BUNDLE-698,bundle:bundle-698,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: tests (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,185797,[Test] Refactor test/test_bmm_outer_product.py,module: tests,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,185797,0,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185797 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4af9ae616808e0955acf33787e30eae207767433ad1b2b43935975c6d6b39bb7
+BUNDLE-699,bundle:bundle-699,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: tests/core (0 issues + 2 PRs),pr,188043,[Test] Make test/test_sort_and_select.py device-agnostic for out-of-tree backends,module: tests/core,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"185649, 188043",0,2,failed_ci_checks,PR #188043 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",564fc49648bd979055c5c204e311cc39f470e16c0e9d2938241bdb23cb5695be
+BUNDLE-700,bundle:bundle-700,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: module: xpu (0 issues + 3 PRs),pr,187549,[xpu][test]testing: enable tf32_on_and_off() for XPU devices,module: xpu,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"182199, 187549, 189227",0,3,failed_ci_checks,PR #187549 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",901b05eca7ca7cd5152d5837327b0f4b7eb3b7536a92ddeefb0083ef2245e778
+BUNDLE-701,bundle:bundle-701,existing_pr_blocked_review,Existing PR blocked review,evidence bundle,Existing PR blocked review: oncall: distributed (0 issues + 5 PRs),pr,162033,[RFC] Switch all of c10d to use .h instead of .hpp,oncall: distributed,"Resolve the blocked PR state: failed checks, pending checks, conflicts, or review blockers.",Makes the next maintainer action explicit before any issue response is written.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"130556, 130856, 148900, 157193, 162033",0,5,failed_ci_checks,PR #162033 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",566808d4949d2106fdfe7f55da266f9d8e29f487d5fcb5e5df5f391bc48adb03
+BUNDLE-702,bundle:bundle-702,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,186776,Fix __qualname__ for OpOverload and OpOverloadPacket,general,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"175964, 181465, 181526, 182618, 183535, 185048, 185645, 185927, 186079, 186776",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #183535 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ca5e31db54e1f2ea9ff0a47cc139c1aabbbd36fd8782f297f56849bc92454784
+BUNDLE-703,bundle:bundle-703,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188297,"Validate target range [0, 1] in binary_cross_entropy_with_logits",general,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"183508, 185831, 186542, 186579, 187247, 187260, 187323, 187572, 187663, 188297",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #188297 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6ffed7143dcd9b625f95a8b997f1bc0124a21386b29213b4e6d1a1771cf76473
+BUNDLE-704,bundle:bundle-704,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189132,Register sspaddmm.out for XPU backend,general,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"172003, 177457, 178082, 178493, 182576, 187477, 188473, 188748, 189019, 189132",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #189019 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d839fb62629e45ca0e0d13be65b742e9dd236419750ecc6300b43bbadb3086d4
+BUNDLE-705,bundle:bundle-705,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,187492,Avoid std::views::reverse in CUDACachingAllocator,general,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"180129, 181730, 182025, 184141, 184335, 185475, 185741, 186138, 186251, 187492",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #187492 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",fcf7c90d7ec7732222fdfc0ea648fc03c3ec14dd2b5d09c20e48171cbe367dab
+BUNDLE-706,bundle:bundle-706,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188608,[ci] Re-enable cuDSS installation in CI Docker images so CUDA CI can actually build and run cuDSS tests,general,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"166396, 170752, 172603, 173258, 174491, 176747, 178550, 187223, 187754, 188608",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #188608 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1d0c6dc8b33ed1d59e86120ba534cb48b6eb7d7851cf721bc35153a36249ee9d
+BUNDLE-707,bundle:bundle-707,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189284,Add torch.autograd.graph.node_creation_hook,general,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"182725, 187434, 187755, 188042, 188331, 188747, 188954, 189109, 189207, 189284",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #188747 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",17986e101ad9f3e8d90ddaa71f84f11a0dd5287a776e0b535205e62810691a5a
+BUNDLE-708,bundle:bundle-708,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: general (0 issues + 7 PRs),pr,182612,Ignore decoding errors when reading CMake cache files (errors='ignore'),general,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"176726, 181110, 181501, 181520, 181926, 182612, 183875",0,7,failed_ci_checks,PR #181110 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",fc463ef77f9a1d4d1fd2dc0ab1bbbb40b18d6fccb56bdadeacb45400bc115472
+BUNDLE-709,bundle:bundle-709,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: activation checkpointing (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,174862,[FSDP2] Fix to differing gradient computation graphs in different ranks,module: activation checkpointing,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,174862,0,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #174862 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5a7e1a012eb619e8d4fb7c86350addaed2cabfb713ca55eb07824fe7ee4d4894
+BUNDLE-710,bundle:bundle-710,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: amp (automated mixed precision) (0 issues + 6 PRs),pr,133419,"Keep is_mkldnn, add is_onednn",module: amp (automated mixed precision),Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"133315, 133392, 133419, 133423, 133667, 133753",0,6,failed_ci_checks,PR #133419 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup. Review signal: fix merge conflicts,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8df2ece7cc724ac30fda541899fffdf4c93cac115fad925fc49d904678eb9e50
+BUNDLE-711,bundle:bundle-711,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: arm (0 issues + 2 PRs),pr,138388,Extending SVE VEC Backend Support in PyTorch to SVE128 and SVE512.,module: arm,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"134942, 138388",0,2,contributor_update_needed,PR #138388 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=331,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4f4f4335bf817a3d0990219d3e1330eca09e35a1561eabe1c601c9853e162631
+BUNDLE-712,bundle:bundle-712,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: autograd (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,97825,Support sparse COO/CSR/CSC/BSR/BSC return values in gradcheck input function,module: autograd,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,97825,0,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #97825 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=384,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6c19d02562da6786d0c581373bb416c698b21bff40ce479ab773312161528034
+BUNDLE-713,bundle:bundle-713,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: bc-breaking (0 issues + 2 PRs),pr,188092,Fix cartesian_prod returning inconsistent shape for single tensor input,module: bc-breaking,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"187558, 188092",0,2,failed_ci_checks,PR #187558 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e3a19a930f6531620df583815a8649dcebd310038701269d2b18f4fb77c0993a
+BUNDLE-714,bundle:bundle-714,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: build (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,188952,Fix C2872 'std' ambiguous symbol when nvcc compiles compiled_autograd.h on Windows extension builds,module: build,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,188952,0,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #188952 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=4,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",fe4686aaadff93ed1b1061db2a59462fd74d9f9d2835dede6ba64e03c0a806e0
+BUNDLE-715,bundle:bundle-715,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: compiled autograd (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,183944,Fix compiled autograd clear saved tensors semantics,module: compiled autograd,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,183944,0,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #183944 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",611d5f0d1cb578832b6beb2279a36573c2b63b3e10fe1c544e3ddc8c4eefa1ba
+BUNDLE-716,bundle:bundle-716,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: cpu (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188249,[inductor] Fix bool equality value range analysis,module: cpu,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"172945, 173072, 175490, 180080, 181665, 183980, 185163, 185256, 185361, 188249",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #188249 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6bb93ebb19b7582168a4efbcbcf9196be584585e53758257f05c7ca59e3dbd5d
+BUNDLE-717,bundle:bundle-717,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: cpu (0 issues + 9 PRs),pr,185910,[AARCH64] Optimize AArch64 qlinear performance by triggering blocked layout in prepacked weight,module: cpu,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"133296, 140372, 169916, 174864, 176420, 179565, 182809, 184372, 185910",0,9,failed_ci_checks,PR #185910 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",530bc1901c6af4d06d2dc8ee4d91d009b8102e54ad54fea6422a706060960bb7
+BUNDLE-718,bundle:bundle-718,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: determinism (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,174718,[inductor] fix allocation with deterministic guard,module: determinism,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,174718,0,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #174718 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",661dc26a5ce13416f48c26b10442120ff1c1193d0af06ca2577f6dad64cb8a9b
+BUNDLE-719,bundle:bundle-719,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: dynamo (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,187316,Support save_on_cpu offloading under first-order torch.func transforms,module: dynamo,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"172727, 172991, 176072, 178204, 180675, 181106, 182980, 185519, 186543, 187316",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #186543 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7b49516698b37135f47168ddf279a3bd73b3202c051a6b7e89f898dfd5fcb73c
+BUNDLE-720,bundle:bundle-720,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: dynamo (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,187603,[executorch][dynamo] Import torch._utils before Dynamo variable registration,module: dynamo,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"179546, 182208, 184533, 184895, 185015, 185407, 185418, 186104, 187414, 187603",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #187603 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",10f148eda60eb94705e5b7a4169808a71d4c06e108e2a73f10be2ec9bcb490f7
+BUNDLE-721,bundle:bundle-721,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: dynamo (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188395,Refactor Dynamo side effect replay into registry dispatcher,module: dynamo,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"171035, 179284, 179425, 184739, 186324, 187654, 187772, 188105, 188374, 188395",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #188395 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1e56a1c69990679bdae3e7889f58bc57d935a898be058200efa63f7a43954012
+BUNDLE-722,bundle:bundle-722,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: dynamo (0 issues + 2 PRs),pr,188004,rewrite exception handling to be more closer to CPython,module: dynamo,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"181352, 188004",0,2,failed_ci_checks,PR #181352 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup. Review signal: LGTM! Please help resolve the merge conflicts | fix merge conflicts,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b0c4749e5cb4df1695b03def55c32f0e26b36088a14e50b13634cc3c8584942a
+BUNDLE-723,bundle:bundle-723,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: inductor (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,187106,[inductor] decompose broadcast-bias baddbmm into bmm + pointwise add,module: inductor,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"177823, 179830, 182794, 183023, 184249, 185157, 185263, 185765, 185977, 187106",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #187106 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5cf8b283a4f26b07a5e841cc91c84b99d6bd3538ac20e4eb5a4b7ff25ef50c40
+BUNDLE-724,bundle:bundle-724,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: inductor (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,187154,Use TORCH_INSTALL_LIB_DIR instead of hardcoded path 'lib',module: inductor,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"178591, 180689, 182276, 184303, 184310, 184312, 184680, 186445, 186766, 187154",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #186766 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8ff685f7bea1348290b1f8d65b4448602859ae78627d4a7c35bdff151746ecf0
+BUNDLE-725,bundle:bundle-725,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: inductor (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,179719,Skip div-to-mul-reciprocal when division_rounding is enabled,module: inductor,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"178048, 179422, 179719, 182233, 183556, 183669, 184654, 186642, 186808, 186950",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #179719 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup. Review signal: fix merge conflicts,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d5630ed465720d6eb4145a28417e6f37c5c9f7a0e55b6d6c69cf50f89a58f22f
+BUNDLE-726,bundle:bundle-726,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: inductor (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188365,[MPS] Remove support for macOS 14,module: inductor,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"176619, 177540, 181138, 182984, 185505, 187573, 187747, 188086, 188095, 188365",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #188365 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",60cb5c73646765d9cb73853001bcbaebb68b8ea122b1a6747c4f648afd889751
+BUNDLE-727,bundle:bundle-727,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: inductor (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189183,[inductor][mtia] Fix fp16 reduction accumulator dtype mismatch,module: inductor,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"178390, 180826, 183433, 183663, 187600, 187940, 188600, 188742, 189096, 189183",0,10,failed_ci_checks,PR #189096 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4c4787ad2474022661eb0d60b4b6786667884a55d57026db30e30f47fc996bca
+BUNDLE-728,bundle:bundle-728,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: inductor (0 issues + 3 PRs),pr,183749,Support auto_functionalized_v2 in can_fuse_into_auto_functionalized,module: inductor,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"180225, 183749, 187165",0,3,failed_ci_checks,PR #187165 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2aa999943fca8453f48f3e2241be064da6ab7e64279c9d5ae74d2436693ab6ce
+BUNDLE-729,bundle:bundle-729,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: pipelining (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,185355,[pipelining] Fix backward hook accumulation on recv buffer activations,module: pipelining,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,185355,0,1,failed_ci_checks,PR #185355 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",927af5a45742888f72aabfb5ee2302d24aa7b922f32e699735c7c5cd4222872a
+BUNDLE-730,bundle:bundle-730,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: privateuse1 (0 issues + 3 PRs),pr,187828,Add privateuse1 backend support to has_triton(),module: privateuse1,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"178463, 186047, 187828",0,3,failed_ci_checks,PR #178463 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d59e131387a3bf9fa8ced1c098677eb4cf69b5139f5ff43d4cfb4b7abdbc7362
+BUNDLE-731,bundle:bundle-731,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: risc-v (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,182278,[CI] Add native build image for linux-riscv64,module: risc-v,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,182278,0,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #182278 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",14d989a9eab0000e07cf833f3a96d2b47e97aa309f0343255733ada05ae65c32
+BUNDLE-732,bundle:bundle-732,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: rocm (0 issues + 6 PRs),pr,187450,[ROCm] periodic-rocm-mi350: run only the 4-GPU distributed tests,module: rocm,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"177961, 178737, 183673, 186652, 187450, 188242",0,6,failed_ci_checks,PR #187450 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f9105baa1b8df3c04236df46def6ca05060d5b21d64e18470b9a3c60a2d7a89e
+BUNDLE-733,bundle:bundle-733,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: sdpa (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,188015,[SDPA] Fix 32-bit dropout RNG offset overflow in mem-efficient attention,module: sdpa,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,188015,0,1,contributor_update_needed,PR #188015 is contributor-owned until requested changes or review questions are answered.,Keep parked or close after maintainer review if the contributor path is no longer active; do not ask for maintainer work first.,medium,reviewDecision=CHANGES_REQUESTED; stale_days=10,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",18d1f13e46eb149ba8f623453be206ec92a0caf380e0b42c77d84da449d0ac8f
+BUNDLE-734,bundle:bundle-734,existing_pr_contributor_wait,Existing PR contributor wait,evidence bundle,Existing PR contributor wait: module: tests/core (0 issues + 2 PRs),pr,185701,[Test] Make test_packed_sequence.py device agnostic for out-of-tree backends,module: tests/core,Keep the existing PR waiting for contributor changes or close it with the linked context preserved.,Avoids re-reviewing stale context until the contributor-owned work changes.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"185617, 185701",0,2,failed_ci_checks,PR #185701 is blocked by failing CI checks: statusCheckRollup.,"Fix or ask the contributor to fix statusCheckRollup, rerun checks, then revisit review/owner-gate approval once the branch is green.",high,failed checks: statusCheckRollup.,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ba41f92dc3fbd204068c57dc01d3b87a245ae81c3f948121a24c50890d8fd4c1
+BUNDLE-735,bundle:bundle-735,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,185454,"fix clamp and clamp_{min,max} gradient at scalar bound to be 0",general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"148023, 178031, 181993, 182384, 184064, 184857, 184885, 185026, 185193, 185454",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185454 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=40,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",43aff640453171988d6cd46c8b2bc94a33d51296d6e739cbc269aa00114c03ba
+BUNDLE-736,bundle:bundle-736,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,185868,"Update clamp, clamp_min, clamp_max to use the minimum norm subgradient",general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"175542, 180444, 180496, 183269, 184698, 184898, 185117, 185747, 185792, 185868",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185868 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=35,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e0578f4caddf3df176c36ccbef10a5f16119ae31a7d9ae2eb48d8aed05d108fe
+BUNDLE-737,bundle:bundle-737,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,186607,Raise a clear error for malformed allocator config instead of INTERNAL_ASSERT,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"172829, 174196, 184577, 185187, 185864, 186073, 186128, 186159, 186207, 186607",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186607 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=30,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",dcfdfb29f0db5f9cc6b231499bb1a90798947e1d9072155f515d6709d853d4d0
+BUNDLE-738,bundle:bundle-738,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,187187,[typing] Replace TypeAlias with TypeAliasType in torch/types.py,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"176746, 177866, 178371, 178797, 179160, 179379, 186863, 186940, 187101, 187187",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #187187 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=25,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d2b15d97f556b9ed82c63f28d54e80aa21309d50742b3fc3adb0b2261535f1ac
+BUNDLE-739,bundle:bundle-739,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,187662,Reject aliased Q/R out tensors in torch.linalg.qr,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"172539, 180188, 185807, 186589, 187238, 187253, 187286, 187329, 187595, 187662",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #187662 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=20,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3e5a8ed4152c713623b9b45918f1e89272a205465ef238bc676da7cadcdba936
+BUNDLE-740,bundle:bundle-740,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,187771,Warn when convert_sync_batchnorm drops _BatchNorm subclass behavior,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"177455, 177985, 178099, 179827, 180601, 180764, 185319, 187597, 187656, 187771",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #187771 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=16,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",822de1bf459948b36d5df94af85dcb5da16f4b415de091c30b901d8e47af0808
+BUNDLE-741,bundle:bundle-741,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,187814,Reject factor=0 in ConstantLR to avoid later ZeroDivisionError,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"175525, 184641, 186929, 187198, 187748, 187757, 187764, 187783, 187790, 187814",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #187814 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=15,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",fa0511e44616f497971addf61c2c9546a9339e88766d80e6969793c874a3db89
+BUNDLE-742,bundle:bundle-742,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188270,Fix inplace modification error with softmax when combining forward and backward AD,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"182601, 183743, 187153, 187246, 187630, 188099, 188138, 188149, 188258, 188270",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188270 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=12,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",83ce0479447ba4d119f57c582ecfa4de16df84153ae0b548ec10f53ff7737553
+BUNDLE-743,bundle:bundle-743,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188271,Allow PrivateUse1 backends to opt out of CEA decomposition,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"182602, 182603, 182604, 182605, 183316, 185398, 185744, 185745, 188183, 188271",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188271 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=11,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",94b55426a7d39f947a4c4e4ac2e55e2487cf8e362ed55457c5aea1e85292a1f9
+BUNDLE-744,bundle:bundle-744,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188543,Remove deprecated torch.utils.mobile_optimizer from API index,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"179377, 185056, 187795, 188347, 188363, 188373, 188381, 188399, 188526, 188543",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188543 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=8,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ae133dc73bb66399965b3df20b4ed7378314370189a8b67a656892f1f86fca74
+BUNDLE-745,bundle:bundle-745,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188732,[MPS] Enable ConvTranspose3d for fp16/bf16 via internal fp32 upcast,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"176434, 182627, 187257, 187309, 188369, 188524, 188525, 188528, 188531, 188732",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188732 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=7,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0c33696131c0baa657279c6093435c7507215e9a9d402f34997e2899dd55cddf
+BUNDLE-746,bundle:bundle-746,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188762,Fix multinomial without replacement silently sampling zero-probability categories,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"172219, 182291, 182296, 187327, 187330, 188200, 188349, 188560, 188647, 188762",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188762 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=6,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",07c9d4a8adb3271a1aeddc67ee8ab0377d91caff5ec16ea5c44445a14c4a8ada
+BUNDLE-747,bundle:bundle-747,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188642,Fix __qualname__ for OpOverloadPacket,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"180408, 181756, 182076, 182133, 182204, 182262, 182268, 187325, 187453, 188642",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188642 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=3,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2e592de2d2864ac57ec04d64d7aae61e149fa3019fafe3e2b26ae466c5fa3b0d
+BUNDLE-748,bundle:bundle-748,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189285,Fix MIOpen RNN dropout: gradient stall and missing per-step mask variation,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"181027, 185794, 188831, 188843, 188857, 188883, 188893, 188968, 188969, 189285",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189285 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7a96ba73a8651cbf89b0c97c2ead0d2fd63b2af37673707e9e92dcf185e20f9d
+BUNDLE-749,bundle:bundle-749,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189006,Ensure correct sign of input for test_laplace in test_distributions.py,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"183366, 185178, 186068, 186089, 186852, 187409, 187554, 187896, 188143, 189006",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189006 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=2,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c3fb6b0076bb2230be51f76aba4f735f74791cd6f0e69dd352d0167ce15cf253
+BUNDLE-750,bundle:bundle-750,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,187620,[FSDP2] Add PartialOffloadPolicy for fractional CPU parameter offload,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"177649, 180087, 186851, 186981, 186982, 186983, 186985, 187213, 187612, 187620",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #187620 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=21,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2830deb82e4296de51c940aa197219456d94d171261f6bece3ee2ab6466c0185
+BUNDLE-751,bundle:bundle-751,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188257,[RFC] S3-over-RDMA checkpoint storage backends via NVIDIA cuObject,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"180573, 181145, 181187, 181528, 187564, 187685, 187835, 188065, 188120, 188257",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188257 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=12,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6937634119bc81d6826fdb1cf9fe59610a39afa31028b052b8e8f6fcb04ae98d
+BUNDLE-752,bundle:bundle-752,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189099,[Profiler][NOT FOR LAND] CI test debugging,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"182838, 182841, 186282, 186980, 187540, 188447, 188781, 188782, 188888, 189099",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189099 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=2,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0df0c08e44db2bedad70e0f2dc47a821b787f5644c48721888bb59214a7d72b6
+BUNDLE-753,bundle:bundle-753,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189304,Use freeze_rng_state in distribution rsample gradient tests,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"181659, 185424, 186302, 187859, 188195, 188388, 188653, 189020, 189253, 189304",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189304 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",442b152ac903b7543df4302c2fb6bbbb0aacd1959ac8c830837a00e1553530db
+BUNDLE-754,bundle:bundle-754,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: general (0 issues + 2 PRs),pr,189238,[XPU] Register linalg._powsum and _foreach_powsum.Scalar for XPU,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"183041, 189238",0,2,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189238 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c0da32a454f3c015aa3279eb4dad688b812a92c5f143113bbbd3a889f5a9c97b
+BUNDLE-755,bundle:bundle-755,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: autograd (0 issues + 2 PRs),pr,187803,fix(autograd): sinc_backward NaN for second derivative at x=0,module: autograd,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"186177, 187803",0,2,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #187803 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=14,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",154578e2a579ab44a5f37f0ee7545e798a4d67b56ca0af51eebdce7de750ad3f
+BUNDLE-756,bundle:bundle-756,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: cpu (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188334,Handle negative integer exponents in SymPy utilities,module: cpu,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"173894, 175509, 181051, 181681, 185959, 186050, 186524, 186930, 187570, 188334",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188334 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=9,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",31e5f7669c34b8b31bec901105fb1908c6d7f3b039ec7332c0c8f5d8452faa05
+BUNDLE-757,bundle:bundle-757,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: cpu (0 issues + 6 PRs),pr,186778,Reduce fp16 batch-1 Conv2d forward divergence on XPU,module: cpu,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"176393, 178305, 180317, 180857, 181557, 186778",0,6,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186778 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=2,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",94cad2660bb76e34caaacb8424fad4a9f699e9ab62f975c6439d72864677b7b7
+BUNDLE-758,bundle:bundle-758,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: crash (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,184545,Fix UntypedStorage.new null allocator crash,module: crash,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,184545,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #184545 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=9,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e830e2a921ace36491551cc6308e4ddce0cf44f98f84bb17c275570244bcb562
+BUNDLE-759,bundle:bundle-759,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: cuda (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,180781,Fix integer divide-by-zero UB in CUDA binary kernels,module: cuda,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,180781,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #180781 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=17,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1bb49511b164f8aef61e95fae5a0cfd65bac4ffb44d27cb9eea850415fab2d47
+BUNDLE-760,bundle:bundle-760,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: dynamo (0 issues + 7 PRs),pr,174559,[lint] Enable Ruff PYI056 by replacing __all__.append/extend usage,module: dynamo,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"174559, 179223, 182147, 187647, 188593, 188918, 189081",0,7,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #174559 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=29,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8170250074ecae6bfe58b6f961c0afbb85401e3393a16c3cfe665de0c5a2f14d
+BUNDLE-761,bundle:bundle-761,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: inductor (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189310,Generalize GeneratorState input device type,module: inductor,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"179941, 180460, 182945, 183530, 187930, 188260, 188579, 188633, 188637, 189310",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189310 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2a9d7780946c6c7c8d5b50e17bc81487d7b9f07760e84c33aee428ee01a0b7da
+BUNDLE-762,bundle:bundle-762,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: inductor (0 issues + 7 PRs),pr,189290,Harden Inductor SubprocPool against compile-worker death and teardown hangs,module: inductor,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"185816, 188112, 188470, 188565, 188739, 189258, 189290",0,7,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189290 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d8133710e5922a0aa9f31d22e5546799adc6273984913afff8e660348d05f1bd
+BUNDLE-763,bundle:bundle-763,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: intel (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,186571,Fix #176298: support unsigned add and sub on CPU,module: intel,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,186571,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186571 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=18,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",31887e6b45e2ab44192ef0a78775a0007a9ba77026a6b48adff6a18d10d05fbb
+BUNDLE-764,bundle:bundle-764,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: mkldnn (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,185217,Fix Debug/RelWithDebInfo PyTorch+XPU on Windows,module: mkldnn,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,185217,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185217 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=37,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a245f437d22fd84e9b7c8e2fb9a73c3248e8d9243985f8497d4f776ade27ca47
+BUNDLE-765,bundle:bundle-765,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: mps (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,188923,test: add gradient health validation tests (fixes #177116),module: mps,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,188923,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188923 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=2,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c1c340414e6f52659380657021bfc116c3d55db92eb469e3f5764a7847004ee2
+BUNDLE-766,bundle:bundle-766,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: nn (0 issues + 2 PRs),pr,184840,Add Module.to overload for memory_format,module: nn,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"182541, 184840",0,2,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #184840 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=43,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1eedebb96ece07ae61b1a6c38a24ddcd8cbe681a67f91460413e0ff4f3d087a5
+BUNDLE-767,bundle:bundle-767,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: numpy (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,188945,Fix assert_close to support comparisons involving Python and NumPy scalars,module: numpy,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,188945,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188945 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=2,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b5fa8bc464a14d2495501856fd9f83189d0217d51abda9ebcdee6cbdef204439
+BUNDLE-768,bundle:bundle-768,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: openreg (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,173239,Test openreg inference hooks,module: openreg,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,173239,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #173239 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=27,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ca48518386b4389ddbeb0150137254f7edf047397f8ef8a13cb372a6c0a7001f
+BUNDLE-769,bundle:bundle-769,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: privateuse1 (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,180184,Export auto-generated unstructured inplace meta dispatch symbols,module: privateuse1,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,180184,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #180184 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=16,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d587371cd038814dd0576eb4b8544044dab583f71b0e8dd604d5fe802df2c780
+BUNDLE-770,bundle:bundle-770,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: python frontend (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,187544,Fix torch.gcd returning negative results for INT_MIN inputs,module: python frontend,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,187544,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #187544 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=7,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",fc57105476b2435e366ce1bfae583e0c7f35095cc79420f5d38d380413b32730
+BUNDLE-771,bundle:bundle-771,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: module: rocm (0 issues + 2 PRs),pr,189154,Bundle unversioned libnuma for ROCm wheels,module: rocm,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"188682, 189154",0,2,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189154 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b9b76090750234daa48a718be41320e0bfdf2462875fb3318ed148f9a64cd67e
+BUNDLE-772,bundle:bundle-772,existing_pr_decision,Existing PR decision,evidence bundle,Existing PR decision: oncall: distributed (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,166388,Fixing assertion fail by checking if no_sync is true before DDPsink,oncall: distributed,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,166388,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #166388 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=6,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",34513374b3aadce7232167b2b70c811d329cc25b3750c705070c4f40287a3de2
+BUNDLE-773,bundle:bundle-773,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,184939,Support SymInt steps for linspace/logspace export,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"174198, 178100, 179528, 179732, 180742, 182034, 182546, 184939, 185190, 187326",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #184939 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=20,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9ed363503d6ed25b913ef0c34491f9db7d216dd3438a54bb48a259319219a25a
+BUNDLE-774,bundle:bundle-774,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,187396,Fix integer linspace decomposition to match eager,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"169249, 177069, 178781, 182323, 184881, 186346, 186566, 186570, 186836, 187396",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #187396 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=19,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c3bf57fce2fa8db782443b221bb45f75b1a06f5120f99b2e8cca596edc752f04
+BUNDLE-775,bundle:bundle-775,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188378,"Fix linspace/logspace docstrings: start/end are Number, not float",general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"182937, 184745, 185812, 186489, 187928, 187969, 188036, 188287, 188321, 188378",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188378 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=4,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",24546f433c8ededc329ead26a6c94b4a2af955ed3392660d416088eaf83b13e1
+BUNDLE-776,bundle:bundle-776,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,178768,Pass tensor data pointer to dlDeviceToTorchDevice from maybeCopyTensor in DLConvertor.cpp,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"171780, 178768, 182924, 183389, 184163, 185189, 185934, 186038, 186519, 186635",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #178768 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f86ddede593643a205fb45632e5949b7f5be182a87e007c8a26ee6c335d19cc2
+BUNDLE-777,bundle:bundle-777,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,187779,Fix MPS fused RMSNorm: do the weight multiply in fp32 to match CPU/CUDA,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"174667, 174826, 176321, 186012, 187068, 187130, 187625, 187720, 187731, 187779",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #187779 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=15,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",96c6d6ea6ffd1f09600e5ebf82102e1cf8e96e443723b15018c14a7e927efac5
+BUNDLE-778,bundle:bundle-778,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189016,[Test] Improve test reuse in test_torch.py for out-of-tree backends,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"181431, 182033, 182784, 183272, 185123, 186468, 186639, 188229, 188666, 189016",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189016 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=2,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8776ad3f3ff0f72780380274c401fd2b36f91799eef4f7eb9953c28e4cc1b42f
+BUNDLE-779,bundle:bundle-779,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189181,[CI] Advisor: split garbage verdict into infra_issue + garbage (minimal),general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"176404, 185586, 188044, 188396, 188656, 188832, 189004, 189017, 189033, 189181",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189181 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4b9bd908a2611c8187b39c6eac8ba2f63ee45e926ac9e0fb96de62cce98244c3
+BUNDLE-780,bundle:bundle-780,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189292,Fix dead ExecuTorch XNNPACK doc link in mobile_optimizer,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"182906, 184261, 185000, 185309, 186527, 187509, 188330, 188901, 189172, 189292",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189292 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ebc94921f412ba93a7caf2fa1e98b7f947b0d6ebff1b005f9463c67fb8af52ee
+BUNDLE-781,bundle:bundle-781,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,186342,Preserve nested fake subclass inputs in AOTAutograd,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"111673, 138436, 138471, 138626, 176001, 185793, 186315, 186322, 186328, 186342",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186342 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=2,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",27e8fc04563542c1e012c729fad48f9e99b8e3cd17a544b840e87bc226ce1444
+BUNDLE-782,bundle:bundle-782,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,183335,Internal,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"183335, 183501, 183738, 183739, 183752, 184426, 184859, 184866, 185125, 185137",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #183335 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=51,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6961a282660f1c547dd064f198178f9d2f8c0cd9e411e6659b29740a54d85390
+BUNDLE-783,bundle:bundle-783,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,185993,Fix SM121 compute capability corruption in CMake GPU arch detection,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"180954, 181833, 182289, 183870, 184142, 185743, 185758, 185883, 185906, 185993",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185993 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=35,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6aeaf0322dca51ca745ff81a6ceb10dfc4d4c74849396cefcc5423f91c7182ca
+BUNDLE-784,bundle:bundle-784,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,186568,Add expected-failure test for ConstantLR factor=0,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"178545, 183855, 184548, 184559, 186045, 186110, 186307, 186559, 186565, 186568",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186568 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=30,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",cb003659087bec6ea1582475b75da94543e6d37263e5875196597a190e191a53
+BUNDLE-785,bundle:bundle-785,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,187146,test all named dims test with dynamic sepcs using automatic conversion,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"178960, 183852, 184190, 186046, 186232, 187006, 187097, 187126, 187135, 187146",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #187146 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=26,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",bcb95b33d0e5eb65e6ec74c34457c9fb0fedb0e3ec530a122960e1e927aa74ab
+BUNDLE-786,bundle:bundle-786,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,187410,[distributed] Use node.target instead of node.name in apply_manual_re…,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"173182, 174605, 176936, 177147, 179000, 179399, 179594, 187192, 187245, 187410",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #187410 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=22,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3fd972306a4117761502e97fa16d9bf83cd33416e8f776bdf95be7dc6f5f9260
+BUNDLE-787,bundle:bundle-787,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,187566,[docs] Improve autograd anomaly mode documentation,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"175706, 179747, 180171, 180187, 180686, 180988, 183811, 185930, 187333, 187566",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #187566 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=21,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5f8076bd0977a4fdafc99cd7270139c75205c83070c5874af1832df34aa6313e
+BUNDLE-788,bundle:bundle-788,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,187881,Fix margin docstring rendering in HingeEmbeddingLoss,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"175425, 175512, 178068, 178069, 178373, 180788, 184398, 187687, 187816, 187881",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #187881 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=15,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",313a52d4a84ce6fa6fe4086bf479d86a8649bea0d1f85ff47085c2dcdc260e62
+BUNDLE-789,bundle:bundle-789,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,187921,Support freeing blocks with stream uses during graph capture,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"186624, 187694, 187713, 187717, 187742, 187769, 187796, 187800, 187847, 187921",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #187921 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=15,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",acb0c220edbdf26a46ef1630b59046202783dfd56346a34f35921fd1149d1118
+BUNDLE-790,bundle:bundle-790,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188407,[Windows] Add triton_windows commit pin for Windows nightly builds,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"181030, 181330, 186145, 186881, 187999, 188045, 188125, 188164, 188364, 188407",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188407 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=9,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",bc9f605888aeae877ae008a4baa39c6431c9a36b90006c36fe03f6ff3a291f99
+BUNDLE-791,bundle:bundle-791,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188626,build-almalinux-images: migrate to OSDC via remote BuildKit,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"181996, 182040, 186617, 188293, 188402, 188433, 188530, 188606, 188625, 188626",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188626 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=8,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5210c877b3eec846bcd0825c7d48e63ba71b9b488e888214ae7c025d553db777
+BUNDLE-792,bundle:bundle-792,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188613,[MPS] copy for contiguous same-dtype using a compute kernel,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"179212, 181862, 182053, 182340, 182582, 182919, 183716, 188315, 188329, 188613",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188613 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=6,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1687daa32e0129e9fd7e99483b410e0b16ae9550224732ee38bb3c7f2477f7dc
+BUNDLE-793,bundle:bundle-793,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188947,[Bugfix][DTensor] Fix wrong shard offsets for uneven DTensor shards in TP-FSDP metadata,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"126348, 138068, 179485, 182159, 185788, 188761, 188804, 188885, 188944, 188947",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188947 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=2,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c9d62a57dddec5cb1b54b00333f0e74e7b18d79b0897c88dc511a48e0a2358f4
+BUNDLE-794,bundle:bundle-794,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189028,[HOP] Moved branch clamping to user surface for switch,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"182747, 183755, 187317, 188434, 188846, 188939, 188946, 188977, 189011, 189028",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189028 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",25ae4268adb379c9a3bf5311b3f364db56f12d075ce6f86578f31c9d0666fc55
+BUNDLE-795,bundle:bundle-795,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189303,"Reapply ""Dispatch index_put_ to fill_ for scalar values (#188267 / #189105)""",general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"187898, 188814, 188867, 188973, 189148, 189160, 189163, 189182, 189199, 189303",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189303 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1ba27ad086b824833ea6e748aac874a70f13a5098cf5fe97a908f281d2674dc2
+BUNDLE-796,bundle:bundle-796,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: general (0 issues + 6 PRs),pr,189260,PERF: improve cuda/xpu Stream.__hash__,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"182024, 186345, 188366, 188367, 188376, 189260",0,6,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189260 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c93e6e4a6c0f5b885c4adca243e3b2bc2c88e8cd95266d74c0e0c99046ef77ca
+BUNDLE-797,bundle:bundle-797,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: 64-bit (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,188031,Fix 64-bit indexing in spatial softmax backward,module: 64-bit,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,188031,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188031 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=10,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0a88a9d717e71b621268fc1641ddd3a561837e9ab76c0928d3a6d33e4d2cea86
+BUNDLE-798,bundle:bundle-798,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: accelerator (0 issues + 2 PRs),pr,187813,Generalize memory viz and cycle detection,module: accelerator,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"171313, 187813",0,2,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #187813 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=14,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",aa67bca70158b059a99f586a47a393f4929391b9464e89a9dfd7f555bc413185
+BUNDLE-799,bundle:bundle-799,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: activation checkpointing (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,178568,Add support for activation checkpointing with nested data structures,module: activation checkpointing,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,178568,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #178568 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=16,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3e86d6d87d04db53e85769389fff87c190f9b3177b38a4b76e5115a9c3baa25d
+BUNDLE-800,bundle:bundle-800,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: amp (automated mixed precision) (0 issues + 4 PRs),pr,183056,[lint] Fix PYI036 violations and re-enable the rule,module: amp (automated mixed precision),"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"170051, 183056, 185917, 186473",0,4,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #183056 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=37,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c35262b91ad2e73df13f02987501e1dbbc343db7fe70315977d1068e2ab85fed
+BUNDLE-801,bundle:bundle-801,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: arm (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,181285,"[TEST][ARM] Remove Pointer Authentication Code from address, fall back to `dladdr_lookup` where possible",module: arm,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,181285,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #181285 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=12,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d868149192d5ea6432478105873f95d0bcc177697d77e53cd06f8ce876b4e33e
+BUNDLE-802,bundle:bundle-802,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: autograd (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,188089,[forward AD] Remove obsolete __debug__ guard when loading JVP decompositions,module: autograd,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,188089,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188089 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=14,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",fd7942576e1cac2c2b12ecdebe9cb1c022aee3919140d1f1b80ca29410623517
+BUNDLE-803,bundle:bundle-803,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: bazel (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,178258,[submodule] Upgrade to protobuf v33.6,module: bazel,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,178258,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #178258 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=27,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f53b91d37b072d89a2a4cc78b6349eb75b84f5e8fd7a78055897012ad89e0c3c
+BUNDLE-804,bundle:bundle-804,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: bc-breaking (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,176584,[RNG] Decouple Philox subsequence from hardware topology for cross-platform consistency,module: bc-breaking,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,176584,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #176584 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=11,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",861ce8d75c0845f20a75cd9b53e36cd030ffc3e712d86183eea0e019d5cf22c2
+BUNDLE-805,bundle:bundle-805,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: build (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,188191,Add sm_121a (NVIDIA GB10/DGX Spark) to default CUDA arch list,module: build,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,188191,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188191 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=11,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",75c1b7e516f67df90c81ed54e696867528f8ddfed1e6a6b48882d447af33e0f3
+BUNDLE-806,bundle:bundle-806,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: cpu (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,183697,Fix SVE blendv mask handling after bool fill,module: cpu,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"120076, 154279, 166813, 171101, 174275, 183697, 183857, 185507, 185821, 186924",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #183697 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=16,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",dc394587f4a67ad62e3fc1f59875772a37966f835813531d9abe56668b415a6b
+BUNDLE-807,bundle:bundle-807,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: cpu (0 issues + 7 PRs),pr,189155,Add CUDA Support for Fused `_add_relu` With Half and BFloat16,module: cpu,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"151218, 162454, 178088, 180209, 182785, 188802, 189155",0,7,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189155 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",807b5a4277a62df699f07bb35520f2ea1050c0ba63d9b804380a88d7fbff49e6
+BUNDLE-808,bundle:bundle-808,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: cuda (0 issues + 6 PRs),pr,189201,[TEST][Inductor] Fix some `test_buffer_mutation*` tests,module: cuda,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"180230, 182062, 186268, 186273, 189102, 189201",0,6,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189201 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b9eccd8fee319626c3682709ed3cae49aab97eff749af9f2a0a2efffee1ea86f
+BUNDLE-809,bundle:bundle-809,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: cudacachingallocator (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,186809,[cudaMallocAsync] Count graph-mem pool in memory_reserved(),module: cudacachingallocator,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,186809,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186809 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",470e7b5c35b2d69315e5750d58a396f79e55d53ff13be63ae5b9f669c989113d
+BUNDLE-810,bundle:bundle-810,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: data (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,161044,Thread based dataloading workers,module: data,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,161044,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #161044 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=48,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",192cab71f6e92f8bef8c72a4c9dcd29e684488af4037475a0311fa4cb4ac6b61
+BUNDLE-811,bundle:bundle-811,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: distributions (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,182687,Support generator arg in dirichlet and beta torch.distributions API,module: distributions,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,182687,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #182687 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=2,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",61e4e51fbf2dfeca9ca32858601994114056beaad69c9b23e04c6c9849e96934
+BUNDLE-812,bundle:bundle-812,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: dynamo (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188799,Fix callable value-opaque objects causing graph break on method access,module: dynamo,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"121445, 178051, 180828, 184947, 185207, 187631, 188175, 188799, 188825, 189021",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188799 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=3,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8a8c866dfd2c1962b8c15bcb292dfd8c8d30d061663b36d0dfb23078817d521a
+BUNDLE-813,bundle:bundle-813,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: dynamo (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188834,[Dynamo] Track generator attribute mutations for proper closure handling,module: dynamo,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"124490, 132814, 184079, 185079, 186321, 186339, 188480, 188638, 188639, 188834",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188834 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",88c32d7a6df4fb485cdeab346b2cf5090a73e403cf3497140e5b9cbdda134fd7
+BUNDLE-814,bundle:bundle-814,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: dynamo (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,146172,Factory function support for NestedTensor,module: dynamo,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"146172, 152159, 180527, 183343, 188029, 188348, 188379, 188903, 189022, 189306",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #146172 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=456,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",74a5276a1fb3877568433be9d874e740da3c1e8daa1152cda797de824623a0c2
+BUNDLE-815,bundle:bundle-815,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: dynamo (0 issues + 5 PRs),pr,189274,[dynamo] Route set/dict-view/list dunder methods through tp_slots,module: dynamo,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"185206, 189052, 189053, 189251, 189274",0,5,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189274 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ff5ae5ffa92764d4e7f5355b50b33f74c5e2ca3bd7506c76b3d2ebe4a2a1e546
+BUNDLE-816,bundle:bundle-816,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: flex attention (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,189187,Retune against triton 3.8,module: flex attention,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,189187,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189187 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c07a095962b1e2b7920089b3b2fddc244d12128607b8c062246b1d008854ef2d
+BUNDLE-817,bundle:bundle-817,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: inductor (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189265,test/inductor: relax FlexAttention invalid-block-size regex,module: inductor,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"181292, 182014, 182344, 184585, 185995, 186492, 187236, 187887, 188472, 189265",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189265 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0e30aa52f55a97806dfa399d59196cb2eac3dad1363f24a210c859b2b064dee2
+BUNDLE-818,bundle:bundle-818,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: inductor (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,188760,Guard user stream compile tests with xfailIfNoAcceleratorTriton,module: inductor,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"175476, 178924, 179698, 179700, 180584, 181622, 185446, 188126, 188660, 188760",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188760 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=5,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9c983916f4fe9e5c7c5988d43de128dfd1afeb180ae47a947cb380aa3630149a
+BUNDLE-819,bundle:bundle-819,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: inductor (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,189184,[inductor][fb] Whole-graph batch_addmm->bmm fusion for independent same-shape addmm (#189184),module: inductor,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"181902, 181903, 181910, 187404, 188823, 188976, 189101, 189108, 189177, 189184",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189184 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",808e1a90e97efb61a6e5eaa3c35ba70769cba1813ba39a270d4df6b4526b0465
+BUNDLE-820,bundle:bundle-820,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: inductor (0 issues + 7 PRs),pr,189188,flex_gemm: support scalar captured epilogue args,module: inductor,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"182987, 188176, 188468, 188870, 188991, 189037, 189188",0,7,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189188 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0bbccd94a2e4e45baefff37d779ae58d045438d8dc149a5808aa54f8507979d2
+BUNDLE-821,bundle:bundle-821,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: intel (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,186603,Exposing MiMalloc options and stats,module: intel,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,186603,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186603 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=7,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b5bd30fe64ca17654d0b65627f58a20998b3ced7862627eb2f686ab5dd4cae1a
+BUNDLE-822,bundle:bundle-822,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: linear algebra (0 issues + 3 PRs),pr,185913,[BugFix] Fix torch.kron crash on non-contiguous input (Issue #185650),module: linear algebra,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"181849, 182426, 185913",0,3,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185913 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=9,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",878de6af0f78b1b8d82b15a069bbe7da6f7312ebd6745b5c1636f89355f18b2e
+BUNDLE-823,bundle:bundle-823,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: mkldnn (0 issues + 3 PRs),pr,188785,Upgrade submodule oneDNN to v3.12.2,module: mkldnn,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"184795, 186575, 188785",0,3,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188785 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=6,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8c7c2b77b5343c83962e703aae1fc14b8ca4a037fbf60e5881312695865d2f49
+BUNDLE-824,bundle:bundle-824,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: mps (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,178037,[MPS] Raise clear error when MPS is used in forked subprocess,module: mps,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,178037,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #178037 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=13,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1077dea5b2486e5fe8ad973fbbc7264b2b19121a3ecc8a07ff97024463053e4a
+BUNDLE-825,bundle:bundle-825,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: nn (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,178590,Correct type hints for ConvNd subclasses,module: nn,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,178590,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #178590 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=36,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",bbb4e101023e190e238eb405d7cbfc047f01342455f84d42fe4c86004a430bf0
+BUNDLE-826,bundle:bundle-826,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: privateuse1 (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,187901,[TEST] Prevent PLATFORM_SUPPORTS_* from skipping tests on privateuse1 backends,module: privateuse1,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,187901,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #187901 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3e91690a49ec881d889a3034546025f1274bbca9b510ed31d0bc41f17ef318ab
+BUNDLE-827,bundle:bundle-827,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: pytree (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,175083,[pytree] add another simplified pytree module `torch.pytree`,module: pytree,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,175083,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #175083 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=4,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9119ce538b89bce375a0dd38618266057510b43967fe212984570036edaf0f3f
+BUNDLE-828,bundle:bundle-828,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: rocm (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,186133,[ROCm] remove redundant @skipIfRocm from test_cudnn_attention_broken_166211,module: rocm,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"179020, 180758, 182030, 186133, 186239, 187799, 188250, 188252, 188555, 189089",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186133 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=35,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0ed358d078d30e15eef418b5ca976f72f85202495b52cfac2fd0de546c63328f
+BUNDLE-829,bundle:bundle-829,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: rocm (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,189100,[ROCm] Fix test_is_pinned_no_context for Python 3.14 forkserver default,module: rocm,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,189100,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #189100 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=0,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ae53ddea4a2ea25b600733fee078764b778cb8f878101828095804c5c6b9466e
+BUNDLE-830,bundle:bundle-830,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: serialization (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,182061,Document low-memory state_dict loading with meta device,module: serialization,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,182061,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #182061 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=4,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",bf3a219c861725f32f143c6eac8aa53c27ee8697fe0dc887070681c0cbde14ea
+BUNDLE-831,bundle:bundle-831,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: sparse (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,186887,Update test_mm_sparse_first_NT/NN input generation,module: sparse,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,186887,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #186887 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=28,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",30cc88bb9660029818d40c9bb454a2fccf3662de7511c75808cc4fb59ff1f337
+BUNDLE-832,bundle:bundle-832,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: testing (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,185184,[Test][distributed] Refactor some distributed test helpers to be device-agnostic,module: testing,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,185184,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185184 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=34,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3332c0e8dd9ac9bf39ff4dc854c7f8a6727999b1b0524fd0bd7d32d68e7b4a8e
+BUNDLE-833,bundle:bundle-833,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: tests (0 issues + 4 PRs),pr,185802,[Test] Refactor test/test_out_dtype_op.py,module: tests,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"181614, 185798, 185802, 185881",0,4,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185802 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=2,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",36f781311d42e0c6def827a0c74bf764fc0975ff3e7d953c887d8390018b13a5
+BUNDLE-834,bundle:bundle-834,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: tests/core (0 issues + 8 PRs),pr,187926,[Test] Refactor test/test_shape_ops.py,module: tests/core,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"184593, 184742, 185901, 186351, 186352, 187926, 189140, 189143",0,8,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #187926 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=2,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",42e0fc5a686d12d56edd121543fa2c73b05ae556293555d506f43be22a885f42
+BUNDLE-835,bundle:bundle-835,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: tests/graph (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,185648,[Test] Make sigmoid_add extension test device-agnostic in test_cpp_extensions_aot.py,module: tests/graph,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,185648,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185648 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=33,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6a2b7ccc85f618b43a23db85f2517949a33264b0d6a53c7eba3e8e3da68067f9
+BUNDLE-836,bundle:bundle-836,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: tests/others (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,184718,[Test] Make test_testing.py device-agnostic for out-of-tree accelerators,module: tests/others,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,184718,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #184718 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=1,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",248a6b854b7d562c8e0624e4933ecb1ecd796347d3a23ab6dc92f7a07a9f2d3f
+BUNDLE-837,bundle:bundle-837,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: module: xpu (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,188874,Enable XPUGraph native recording mode,module: xpu,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,188874,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #188874 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=2,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",cee4687b085427e0fd9c28b93968a66e513d4475a986f642c09f5a6bee669ba5
+BUNDLE-838,bundle:bundle-838,existing_pr_final_review,Existing PR final review,evidence bundle,Existing PR final review: oncall: distributed (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,141912,Add stdlib includes to c10d debug handlers,oncall: distributed,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,141912,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #141912 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=APPROVED; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=485,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f31199fb31053681be5b9bb47d2f77806eb90636cc28e76b041ddaee8c5928a4
+BUNDLE-839,bundle:bundle-839,existing_pr_stale_sweep,Existing stale PR sweep,evidence bundle,Existing stale PR sweep: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,183052,Fix OOM error suggesting expandable_segments when already enabled,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"102148, 147365, 152104, 154395, 159862, 173644, 181052, 181367, 183039, 183052",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #183052 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=57,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8da2b38dd783888b785d4e4a145956f639dc61bd60607ee6841895b2f028c900
+BUNDLE-840,bundle:bundle-840,existing_pr_stale_sweep,Existing stale PR sweep,evidence bundle,Existing stale PR sweep: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,184349,Improve complex input error for BatchNorm,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"180420, 180748, 181073, 182348, 182609, 182803, 183367, 183522, 184058, 184349",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #184349 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=50,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",df70cac3f95dbf3020599b8af2cecc85be6287811f8ba2370134c538b53ca367
+BUNDLE-841,bundle:bundle-841,existing_pr_stale_sweep,Existing stale PR sweep,evidence bundle,Existing stale PR sweep: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,179936,[MPS] Fix avg_pool2d precision by using Metal kernel instead of MPSGraph,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"108303, 117905, 130462, 140321, 142114, 146318, 175537, 176893, 178513, 179936",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #179936 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=49,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b210060d6b22f8a53452b9957731e2e658997dbf7934f7640b8a4e33d0a0918e
+BUNDLE-842,bundle:bundle-842,existing_pr_stale_sweep,Existing stale PR sweep,evidence bundle,Existing stale PR sweep: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,182975,Document 5 public APIs in docs/source/utils.md,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"132414, 152158, 165986, 167541, 174768, 174959, 176430, 177126, 182934, 182975",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #182975 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=58,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",fc53844a990947b286dd11843aa7dbd9c6160b5fa2ec273a3626444a18bda544
+BUNDLE-843,bundle:bundle-843,existing_pr_stale_sweep,Existing stale PR sweep,evidence bundle,Existing stale PR sweep: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,183787,[PyTorch] Support selective TorchScript tensor data elision (#183787),general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"166625, 169936, 171686, 175320, 176709, 177450, 181262, 182114, 183405, 183787",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #183787 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=55,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",09508234996d47d394cccf9db03ca503f506f0490ed03722b2aef98932a2f5ae
+BUNDLE-844,bundle:bundle-844,existing_pr_stale_sweep,Existing stale PR sweep,evidence bundle,Existing stale PR sweep: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,183726,[poc] yet another nonstrict api,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"182424, 182746, 182788, 182873, 183037, 183203, 183386, 183502, 183568, 183726",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #183726 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=54,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1c507c8d32658eea3afdc136b4e861c4a3d87d803a608213d5e313cd01a78f2a
+BUNDLE-845,bundle:bundle-845,existing_pr_stale_sweep,Existing stale PR sweep,evidence bundle,Existing stale PR sweep: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,184605,Add CPython Dynamo agentic loop plan,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"126199, 147653, 178850, 182269, 183507, 183976, 184042, 184116, 184358, 184605",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #184605 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=48,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3da77f42f1de899b1e87a9450548868ad591d21ff166c996f78ab9b6b23606e0
+BUNDLE-846,bundle:bundle-846,existing_pr_stale_sweep,Existing stale PR sweep,evidence bundle,Existing stale PR sweep: general (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,184777,Refactor test_dlpack for out of tree backend,general,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"180888, 182811, 183211, 183253, 183594, 183903, 184318, 184498, 184724, 184777",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #184777 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=46,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9d70fe4f9127e8b81720523d49f09a8357e8318e26e02c33792a30532b33767c
+BUNDLE-847,bundle:bundle-847,existing_pr_stale_sweep,Existing stale PR sweep,evidence bundle,Existing stale PR sweep: module: build (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,152828,[MSVC] Remove redundant MEM_EFF_ATTENTION_CUDA_SOURCES definition as /Zc:lambda is set globally for C++20 by default,module: build,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,152828,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #152828 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=59,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",869619aa86380e20b89a965a161606d6aa2f72d9880e780b78ef0fce1f83f72d
+BUNDLE-848,bundle:bundle-848,existing_pr_stale_sweep,Existing stale PR sweep,evidence bundle,Existing stale PR sweep: module: cpu (0 issues + 7 PRs),pr,174882,Fix torch.histc float16 precision inconsistency,module: cpu,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"102613, 119496, 142160, 145922, 167306, 174882, 184067",0,7,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #174882 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=49,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d59651b255046f5c493d16b980603429633d90184737146b67ea5d6b60a1d338
+BUNDLE-849,bundle:bundle-849,existing_pr_stale_sweep,Existing stale PR sweep,evidence bundle,Existing stale PR sweep: module: docs (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,182583,Skip RST<->MD source conversions in doc-redirects-check,module: docs,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,182583,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #182583 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=55,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",98aad7f759119e5887c243f307ee36e97df28ae7e5fe2415591c2df15ebdd49d
+BUNDLE-850,bundle:bundle-850,existing_pr_stale_sweep,Existing stale PR sweep,evidence bundle,Existing stale PR sweep: module: dynamo (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,184753,Fix Dynamo frozenset copy identity semantics,module: dynamo,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"110155, 125270, 125326, 125428, 141842, 143812, 146101, 147927, 153317, 184753",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #184753 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=48,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",99dc1e0871f6bc7a8b5cf9bdf40da85f2c21d74ddd9fb198705ca5197ff96669
+BUNDLE-851,bundle:bundle-851,existing_pr_stale_sweep,Existing stale PR sweep,evidence bundle,Existing stale PR sweep: module: dynamo (0 issues + 3 PRs),pr,183360,Prototype lazy activation checkpoint compile,module: dynamo,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"177636, 183359, 183360",0,3,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #183360 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=57,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7887a1ec1a82d6424d93c9f1b3ea8b5e6f98c0f2d21c4b8bd1fd3edefe83486b
+BUNDLE-852,bundle:bundle-852,existing_pr_stale_sweep,Existing stale PR sweep,evidence bundle,Existing stale PR sweep: module: inductor (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,182857,[inductor][mtia] Skip matvec bmm/addmm decomposition on MTIA; add MTIA matvec bmm lowering (#182857),module: inductor,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"138519, 142295, 182850, 182857, 183009, 183028, 184929, 184932, 184936, 184940",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #182857 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=57,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",17f753d63a88ab04622c6f32a2c6ce461ceb35b1b2450a11eead3072fd58e17d
+BUNDLE-853,bundle:bundle-853,existing_pr_stale_sweep,Existing stale PR sweep,evidence bundle,Existing stale PR sweep: module: inductor (0 issues + 10 PRs),pr,185037,[inductor] Use persistent path for small fused online softmax,module: inductor,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"184931, 184935, 184941, 184998, 185003, 185027, 185028, 185030, 185036, 185037",0,10,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185037 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=45,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",99669ffcd11509aa76439f7258b0efc2f7eb8abdfff4e968721a744e52d9ff3f
+BUNDLE-854,bundle:bundle-854,existing_pr_stale_sweep,Existing stale PR sweep,evidence bundle,Existing stale PR sweep: module: inductor (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,185032,[inductor] Reuse expensive broadcast factors in pointwise tiling,module: inductor,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,185032,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #185032 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=45,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2a08a7f984b200b34713d5bb4f6163bb84bab54428c39048898799d903575539
+BUNDLE-855,bundle:bundle-855,existing_pr_stale_sweep,Existing stale PR sweep,evidence bundle,Existing stale PR sweep: module: linear algebra (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,162079,Tune linalg_eigh_cusolver: better heuristic for syevj_batched selection on cuda,module: linear algebra,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,162079,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #162079 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=235,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",39883c04cba92aacec050989cd8026db2ff888986ca7355cf6b67ceca4ea95bd
+BUNDLE-856,bundle:bundle-856,existing_pr_stale_sweep,Existing stale PR sweep,evidence bundle,Existing stale PR sweep: module: mkldnn (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,88106,WIP: feat: LARS optimizer,module: mkldnn,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,88106,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #88106 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=890,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3649920a02f3164b414381482d914f6878bbdb165912560fd67088a3594d33c8
+BUNDLE-857,bundle:bundle-857,existing_pr_stale_sweep,Existing stale PR sweep,evidence bundle,Existing stale PR sweep: module: nn (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,168895,Add `pad_to_multiple_of` to `pad_sequence` (C++ only),module: nn,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,168895,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #168895 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=155,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0c4acb000a1c3f1da1bf302cf111938e430b327c1b2d334e48488595e2b4f817
+BUNDLE-858,bundle:bundle-858,existing_pr_stale_sweep,Existing stale PR sweep,evidence bundle,Existing stale PR sweep: module: nvfuser (0 issues + 3 PRs),pr,88998,Fix fake tensor propagation for nvprims,module: nvfuser,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"84545, 85699, 88998",0,3,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #88998 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=1179,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d8f53f75d1962c4b627815db199c2598119af80daad02d730aa43f99715ee3d0
+BUNDLE-859,bundle:bundle-859,existing_pr_stale_sweep,Existing stale PR sweep,evidence bundle,Existing stale PR sweep: module: pipelining (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,153893,[PP] Fix double backward error in stage_backward,module: pipelining,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,153893,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #153893 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=CLEAN; pending=; stale_days=110,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6bfe21461c350d16d90ef9b9de0fb7225333e2b45e8bcc6659d372b6f2957b8f
+BUNDLE-860,bundle:bundle-860,existing_pr_stale_sweep,Existing stale PR sweep,evidence bundle,Existing stale PR sweep: module: primtorch (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,82997,Implement refs.var as a real reference,module: primtorch,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,82997,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #82997 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=1179,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2361a6df499c8bb340fb63b00fc8e3b3c2e8d6eaef360c8a19abd3a36ffa777f
+BUNDLE-861,bundle:bundle-861,existing_pr_stale_sweep,Existing stale PR sweep,evidence bundle,Existing stale PR sweep: module: rocm (0 issues + 2 PRs),pr,182836,[ROCm][CI] Update mi200 workflows to use arc label,module: rocm,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"182836, 183354",0,2,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #182836 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=55,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f05ad84f4301b3fa9a55db22441795c0551ac5ce010bbe215cc93c8cc87ca70d
+BUNDLE-862,bundle:bundle-862,existing_pr_stale_sweep,Existing stale PR sweep,evidence bundle,Existing stale PR sweep: oncall: distributed (0 issues + 3 PRs),pr,136835,Add back DistributedDataParallel types that were lost when pyi was removed,oncall: distributed,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,"130752, 136835, 146593",0,3,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #136835 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=428,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3b838c7aa9a1c2f8064fac55d485e48c7752b02a48d99840a387953324e625f5
+BUNDLE-863,bundle:bundle-863,existing_pr_stale_sweep,Existing stale PR sweep,evidence bundle,Existing stale PR sweep: oncall: jit (0 issues + 1 PR),pr,162130,Raise error when no record on `extra_files`,oncall: jit,"Use the existing PR as the resolution vehicle; decide merge, close, rebase, or maintainer takeover.",Avoids opening a duplicate PR when an active patch already exists.,"Use the existing PR checks, review decision, changed-file list, and any pending/failed status as the proof gate before merge/close.",covered_by_local_packet,,162130,0,1,maintainer_decision_needed,PR #162130 has no local failed-check diagnosis; it needs a maintainer merge/close/rebase decision.,"Review changed files, linked issues, and latest maintainer comments, then choose merge, close, rebase request, or maintainer takeover.",medium,reviewDecision=; mergeStateStatus=UNKNOWN; pending=; stale_days=233,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ee339b8d63abf7f75b505f484af42c7ffe020c52d7ed96e7916ab4ac2ec0bc98
+BUNDLE-864,bundle:bundle-864,duplicate_resolution_sweep,Duplicate/related issue sweep,evidence bundle,Duplicate/related issue sweep: module: __torch_function__ (24 issues),issue_group,,module: __torch_function__ needs triage queue (24 issues),module: __torch_function__,"Compare 24 related reports, select a canonical thread, and close or link duplicates in one pass.","Reduces separate answers for issues that likely share a fix, answer, or reproduction.","No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"119346, 119357, 119364, 119490, 119514, 119536, 119537, 119576, 167693, 185267, 185268, 186344, 186400, 186587, 186637, 186773, 186823, 188674, 188678, 188691, 188836, 188896, 189322, 189323",,24,0,duplicate_consolidation,The local evidence indicates likely related reports that should share one canonical answer or implementation path.,"Pick the canonical issue, preserve the strongest reproduction, and close/link duplicates in one maintainer pass.",medium,"issues #167693 and #119536 share title/component terms: __main__, disabled | issues #167693 and #119346 share title/component terms: __main__, disabled | issues #167693 and #119364 share title/component terms: __main__, disabled | issues #167693 and #119357 share title/component terms: __main__, disabled | issues #167693 and #119576 share title/component terms: __main__, disabled | issues #167693 and #119514 share...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1caad2bfec1fbb3ae59e12fb441b7be9cd4cdc899a1fc27ebc4f566b5d97267b
+BUNDLE-865,bundle:bundle-865,duplicate_resolution_sweep,Duplicate/related issue sweep,evidence bundle,Duplicate/related issue sweep: module: abi (2 issues),issue_group,,module: abi high-priority/blocker queue (2 issues),module: abi,"Compare 2 related reports, select a canonical thread, and close or link duplicates in one pass.","Reduces separate answers for issues that likely share a fix, answer, or reproduction.","No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"149658, 187320",,2,0,duplicate_consolidation,The local evidence indicates likely related reports that should share one canonical answer or implementation path.,"Pick the canonical issue, preserve the strongest reproduction, and close/link duplicates in one maintainer pass.",medium,"issues #187320 and #149658 share title/component terms: pytorch, stable, version",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",be10eec22506817dd75b8d6bb8abef7b524099aa14fe4f97078280181b03895d
+BUNDLE-866,bundle:bundle-866,duplicate_resolution_sweep,Duplicate/related issue sweep,evidence bundle,Duplicate/related issue sweep: module: activation checkpointing (2 issues),issue_group,,module: activation checkpointing needs triage queue (2 issues),module: activation checkpointing,"Compare 2 related reports, select a canonical thread, and close or link duplicates in one pass.","Reduces separate answers for issues that likely share a fix, answer, or reproduction.","No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"85088, 183207",,2,0,duplicate_consolidation,The local evidence indicates likely related reports that should share one canonical answer or implementation path.,"Pick the canonical issue, preserve the strongest reproduction, and close/link duplicates in one maintainer pass.",medium,"issues #85088 and #183207 share title/component terms: does, not, work",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",68e9f141fd5f8bd184eb1b24c5cb6c84352f026aee94b72245057d467047173f
+BUNDLE-867,bundle:bundle-867,duplicate_resolution_sweep,Duplicate/related issue sweep,evidence bundle,Duplicate/related issue sweep: module: amp (automated mixed precision) (52 issues),issue_group,,module: amp (automated mixed precision) high-priority/blocker queue (49 issues),module: amp (automated mixed precision),"Compare 52 related reports, select a canonical thread, and close or link duplicates in one pass.","Reduces separate answers for issues that likely share a fix, answer, or reproduction.","No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"30651, 55669, 66782, 78829, 91633, 96779, 97086, 111901, 116423, 117494, 118088, 119845, 121101, 122308, 122478, 124644, 124656, 125664, 135835, 136712, 136728, 136819, 142454, 142457, 142459, 142834, 143484, 143487, 146788, 150098, 152102, 154014, 155146, 155147, 156563, 162343, 162797, 169210, 169741, 171838, 173495, 173574, 177227, 179030, 180740, 181853, 182279, 183251, 185247, 187659, 188261, 188912",,52,0,duplicate_consolidation,The local evidence indicates likely related reports that should share one canonical answer or implementation path.,"Pick the canonical issue, preserve the strongest reproduction, and close/link duplicates in one maintainer pass.",medium,"issues #116423 and #155146 share title/component terms: fault, segmentation | issues #116423 and #183251 share title/component terms: fault, pytorch, segmentation | issues #119845 and #155146 share title/component terms: fault, segmentation | issues #119845 and #181853 share title/component terms: dataloader, fault, segmentation, worker | issues #119845 and #142834 share title/component terms: fault, segmentation...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",fc3a3cddad07d704f234459481db2cc9b27665cdc05c631eede2f8afdb29b426
+BUNDLE-868,bundle:bundle-868,duplicate_resolution_sweep,Duplicate/related issue sweep,evidence bundle,Duplicate/related issue sweep: module: aotdispatch (6 issues),issue_group,,module: aotdispatch high-priority/blocker queue (6 issues),module: aotdispatch,"Compare 6 related reports, select a canonical thread, and close or link duplicates in one pass.","Reduces separate answers for issues that likely share a fix, answer, or reproduction.","No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"38910, 173313, 174468, 174704, 183890, 187781",,6,0,duplicate_consolidation,The local evidence indicates likely related reports that should share one canonical answer or implementation path.,"Pick the canonical issue, preserve the strongest reproduction, and close/link duplicates in one maintainer pass.",medium,"issues #174468 and #174704 share title/component terms: compile, torch | issues #174468 and #173313 share title/component terms: compile, torch | issues #174468 and #183890 share title/component terms: compile, torch | issues #174468 and #187781 share title/component terms: compile, memory, torch | issues #174468 and #38910 share title/component terms: leak, memory | issues #174704 and #173313 share title/componen...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8bb10d37e700430e360f43802c4396845547ec4e2c9b65ae996998f6e29af5fd
+BUNDLE-869,bundle:bundle-869,duplicate_resolution_sweep,Duplicate/related issue sweep,evidence bundle,Duplicate/related issue sweep: module: arm (9 issues),issue_group,,module: arm has linked PR queue (2 issues),module: arm,"Compare 9 related reports, select a canonical thread, and close or link duplicates in one pass.","Reduces separate answers for issues that likely share a fix, answer, or reproduction.","No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"40425, 149201, 161783, 162422, 170877, 177247, 177249, 178538, 188255",,9,0,duplicate_consolidation,The local evidence indicates likely related reports that should share one canonical answer or implementation path.,"Pick the canonical issue, preserve the strongest reproduction, and close/link duplicates in one maintainer pass.",medium,"issues #162422 and #161783 share title/component terms: compile, runtime, torch | issues #188255 and #178538 share title/component terms: crash, import, torch | issues #170877 and #177249 share title/component terms: aarch64, failure, test, unit | issues #170877 and #177247 share title/component terms: aarch64, failure, test, unit | issues #177249 and #177247 share title/component terms: aarch64, failure, test, un...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",341d6141b10d94a45ee14319a30490ea76b18783c39411387362cebaf5f0caf4
+BUNDLE-870,bundle:bundle-870,duplicate_resolution_sweep,Duplicate/related issue sweep,evidence bundle,Duplicate/related issue sweep: module: autograd (16 issues),issue_group,,module: autograd needs triage queue (4 issues),module: autograd,"Compare 16 related reports, select a canonical thread, and close or link duplicates in one pass.","Reduces separate answers for issues that likely share a fix, answer, or reproduction.","No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"73294, 80946, 143580, 146907, 153937, 155693, 158701, 172798, 181024, 182283, 185715, 186453, 189280, 189281, 189282, 189283",,16,0,duplicate_consolidation,The local evidence indicates likely related reports that should share one canonical answer or implementation path.,"Pick the canonical issue, preserve the strongest reproduction, and close/link duplicates in one maintainer pass.",medium,"issues #189282 and #189281 share title/component terms: 2025, aarch64, cpu, measurement, nov, operator_benchmark, possible, since | issues #189281 and #189283 share title/component terms: 2025, cpu, nov, operator_benchmark, since | issues #189281 and #189280 share title/component terms: 2025, cpu, nov, operator_benchmark, possible, since, slower | issues #186453 and #185715 share title/component terms: assert, c10...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b8999ee0d4872e7cabaea574577e6e5479de8df72034cb430a996c6081b2e555
+BUNDLE-871,bundle:bundle-871,duplicate_resolution_sweep,Duplicate/related issue sweep,evidence bundle,Duplicate/related issue sweep: module: bfloat16 (14 issues),issue_group,,module: bfloat16 needs triage queue (14 issues),module: bfloat16,"Compare 14 related reports, select a canonical thread, and close or link duplicates in one pass.","Reduces separate answers for issues that likely share a fix, answer, or reproduction.","No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"19106, 48251, 52741, 67797, 75171, 86532, 86594, 86595, 97876, 159238, 173492, 183812, 183815, 189298",,14,0,duplicate_consolidation,The local evidence indicates likely related reports that should share one canonical answer or implementation path.,"Pick the canonical issue, preserve the strongest reproduction, and close/link duplicates in one maintainer pass.",medium,"issues #159238 and #19106 share title/component terms: jit, performance, torch, trace | issues #86595 and #86594 share title/component terms: computing, crash, jit, model, will | issues #86595 and #86532 share title/component terms: crash, jit, will | issues #86594 and #86532 share title/component terms: crash, jit, will | issues #86532 and #189298 share title/component terms: jit, trace | issues #183812 and #1838...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",390d3e49fddec964256938591487c14cd1b917debcd4b54f77b6fb80ea73c2c5
+BUNDLE-872,bundle:bundle-872,duplicate_resolution_sweep,Duplicate/related issue sweep,evidence bundle,Duplicate/related issue sweep: module: binaries (8 issues),issue_group,,module: binaries high-priority/blocker queue (2 issues),module: binaries,"Compare 8 related reports, select a canonical thread, and close or link duplicates in one pass.","Reduces separate answers for issues that likely share a fix, answer, or reproduction.","No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"37449, 66033, 87209, 119547, 170039, 178085, 188958, 188959",,8,0,duplicate_consolidation,The local evidence indicates likely related reports that should share one canonical answer or implementation path.,"Pick the canonical issue, preserve the strongest reproduction, and close/link duplicates in one maintainer pass.",medium,"issues #170039 and #66033 share title/component terms: __1, argument, failed, invalid, std, system_error | issues #178085 and #87209 share title/component terms: access, cuda, encountered, error, illegal, memory, was | issues #178085 and #37449 share title/component terms: access, cuda, encountered, error, illegal, memory, was | issues #188958 and #188959 share title/component terms: cuda, illegal, memory, read |...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b4906d55e8c8fdc3711c15b2010db0ac18aa68d71823924f33de68d82c519f53
+BUNDLE-873,bundle:bundle-873,duplicate_resolution_sweep,Duplicate/related issue sweep,evidence bundle,Duplicate/related issue sweep: module: c10d (3 issues),issue_group,,module: c10d needs triage queue (3 issues),module: c10d,"Compare 3 related reports, select a canonical thread, and close or link duplicates in one pass.","Reduces separate answers for issues that likely share a fix, answer, or reproduction.","No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"74809, 144359, 163193",,3,0,duplicate_consolidation,The local evidence indicates likely related reports that should share one canonical answer or implementation path.,"Pick the canonical issue, preserve the strongest reproduction, and close/link duplicates in one maintainer pass.",medium,"issues #163193 and #144359 share title/component terms: incorrect, results | issues #144359 and #74809 share title/component terms: incorrect, results, tensor",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6c9ff1d633a281a8381cb3bc102a204b88a90ca824f90fb1750b00861e5bd81d
+BUNDLE-874,bundle:bundle-874,duplicate_resolution_sweep,Duplicate/related issue sweep,evidence bundle,Duplicate/related issue sweep: module: complex (2 issues),issue_group,,module: complex high-priority/blocker queue (2 issues),module: complex,"Compare 2 related reports, select a canonical thread, and close or link duplicates in one pass.","Reduces separate answers for issues that likely share a fix, answer, or reproduction.","No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"185405, 188069",,2,0,duplicate_consolidation,The local evidence indicates likely related reports that should share one canonical answer or implementation path.,"Pick the canonical issue, preserve the strongest reproduction, and close/link duplicates in one maintainer pass.",medium,"issues #188069 and #185405 share title/component terms: autotune, bmm, compile, max, mode, torch",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",47542788130d71d97410b8a674c7bb2cf67e559e7197159f63026e512e2c34cc
+BUNDLE-875,bundle:bundle-875,duplicate_resolution_sweep,Duplicate/related issue sweep,evidence bundle,Duplicate/related issue sweep: module: correctness (silent) (6 issues),issue_group,,module: correctness (silent) high-priority/blocker queue (6 issues),module: correctness (silent),"Compare 6 related reports, select a canonical thread, and close or link duplicates in one pass.","Reduces separate answers for issues that likely share a fix, answer, or reproduction.","No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"187444, 187445, 187446, 187447, 187448, 187449",,6,0,duplicate_consolidation,The local evidence indicates likely related reports that should share one canonical answer or implementation path.,"Pick the canonical issue, preserve the strongest reproduction, and close/link duplicates in one maintainer pass.",medium,"issues #187444 and #187449 share title/component terms: adamw, compile, ddp, divergence, eager, nccl, node, resnet50 | issues #187444 and #187448 share title/component terms: adamw, compile, ddp, divergence, eager, resnet50, torch | issues #187444 and #187447 share title/component terms: compile, ddp, divergence, eager, resnet50, torch | issues #187444 and #187446 share title/component terms: compile, ddp, diverge...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9646ba8c0567e6ecaaed051b02c1f328552760ac8b16aabe6bf743596b1b2d71
+BUNDLE-876,bundle:bundle-876,duplicate_resolution_sweep,Duplicate/related issue sweep,evidence bundle,Duplicate/related issue sweep: module: cpu (7 issues),issue_group,,module: cpu needs triage queue (5 issues),module: cpu,"Compare 7 related reports, select a canonical thread, and close or link duplicates in one pass.","Reduces separate answers for issues that likely share a fix, answer, or reproduction.","No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"99509, 115640, 141668, 150011, 152108, 177508, 183401",,7,0,duplicate_consolidation,The local evidence indicates likely related reports that should share one canonical answer or implementation path.,"Pick the canonical issue, preserve the strongest reproduction, and close/link duplicates in one maintainer pass.",medium,"issues #152108 and #177508 share title/component terms: amp, cpu, inductor, nightly, performance, regression, release | issues #152108 and #141668 share title/component terms: amp, cpu, inductor, nightly, performance, regression, release, wrapper | issues #150011 and #141668 share title/component terms: cpp, cpu, inductor, wrapper | issues #183401 and #141668 share title/component terms: cpp, cpu, inductor, nightl...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",004c6e3196d849ab5a71b4427dc9aaab83754d36e305e4c8ce479893ef1b57d3
+BUNDLE-877,bundle:bundle-877,duplicate_resolution_sweep,Duplicate/related issue sweep,evidence bundle,Duplicate/related issue sweep: module: crash (8 issues),issue_group,,module: crash needs triage queue (4 issues),module: crash,"Compare 8 related reports, select a canonical thread, and close or link duplicates in one pass.","Reduces separate answers for issues that likely share a fix, answer, or reproduction.","No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"39388, 116351, 130708, 143574, 145064, 177476, 177825, 182653",,8,0,duplicate_consolidation,The local evidence indicates likely related reports that should share one canonical answer or implementation path.,"Pick the canonical issue, preserve the strongest reproduction, and close/link duplicates in one maintainer pass.",medium,"issues #116351 and #182653 share title/component terms: fpe, torch | issues #177476 and #182653 share title/component terms: crash, functional, quantized, torch | issues #177476 and #177825 share title/component terms: quantized, sized, tensor, torch | issues #145064 and #130708 share title/component terms: causes, fault, segmentation, size, tensor | issues #143574 and #39388 share title/component terms: error, nc...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",98ba26cefbbc6302fc2a029bef509cb0679a0079c1575839b7107ca86569a261
+BUNDLE-878,bundle:bundle-878,duplicate_resolution_sweep,Duplicate/related issue sweep,evidence bundle,Duplicate/related issue sweep: module: dataloader (2 issues),issue_group,,module: dataloader needs triage queue (2 issues),module: dataloader,"Compare 2 related reports, select a canonical thread, and close or link duplicates in one pass.","Reduces separate answers for issues that likely share a fix, answer, or reproduction.","No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"87995, 167975",,2,0,duplicate_consolidation,The local evidence indicates likely related reports that should share one canonical answer or implementation path.,"Pick the canonical issue, preserve the strongest reproduction, and close/link duplicates in one maintainer pass.",medium,"issues #87995 and #167975 share title/component terms: after, distributed, multi, node, training",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",af6089b2b3ed31747815c7bac2c940e2667a2bbbf74e9b97d1f240834d084d2e
+BUNDLE-879,bundle:bundle-879,duplicate_resolution_sweep,Duplicate/related issue sweep,evidence bundle,Duplicate/related issue sweep: module: ddp (9 issues),issue_group,,module: ddp needs triage queue (7 issues),module: ddp,"Compare 9 related reports, select a canonical thread, and close or link duplicates in one pass.","Reduces separate answers for issues that likely share a fix, answer, or reproduction.","No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"67389, 82308, 91173, 102596, 130113, 153779, 170045, 178766, 183459",,9,0,duplicate_consolidation,The local evidence indicates likely related reports that should share one canonical answer or implementation path.,"Pick the canonical issue, preserve the strongest reproduction, and close/link duplicates in one maintainer pass.",medium,"issues #183459 and #67389 share title/component terms: distributed, torch | issues #183459 and #178766 share title/component terms: _functional_collectives, distributed, torch | issues #67389 and #91173 share title/component terms: distributed, missing, torch | issues #178766 and #82308 share title/component terms: gets, torch, wrong | issues #102596 and #91173 share title/component terms: distributed, import, tor...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6c877cfa7c1454b537269f4a61a451484730855e2980b79e7a1542b7d8caed31
+BUNDLE-880,bundle:bundle-880,duplicate_resolution_sweep,Duplicate/related issue sweep,evidence bundle,Duplicate/related issue sweep: module: dynamo (4 issues),issue_group,,module: dynamo needs triage queue (4 issues),module: dynamo,"Compare 4 related reports, select a canonical thread, and close or link duplicates in one pass.","Reduces separate answers for issues that likely share a fix, answer, or reproduction.","No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"144663, 166572, 167623, 175520",,4,0,duplicate_consolidation,The local evidence indicates likely related reports that should share one canonical answer or implementation path.,"Pick the canonical issue, preserve the strongest reproduction, and close/link duplicates in one maintainer pass.",medium,"issues #144663 and #175520 share title/component terms: export, support, torch | issues #144663 and #167623 share title/component terms: export, support, torch | issues #144663 and #166572 share title/component terms: export, exportedprogram, torch | issues #175520 and #167623 share title/component terms: export, support, torch",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0059878816eb662ab945671a1f8bd02b9db9f86c38c40a98aeb25e3fc2a517a0
+BUNDLE-881,bundle:bundle-881,duplicate_resolution_sweep,Duplicate/related issue sweep,evidence bundle,Duplicate/related issue sweep: module: nn (2 issues),issue_group,,module: nn high-priority/blocker queue (2 issues),module: nn,"Compare 2 related reports, select a canonical thread, and close or link duplicates in one pass.","Reduces separate answers for issues that likely share a fix, answer, or reproduction.","No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"86120, 175293",,2,0,duplicate_consolidation,The local evidence indicates likely related reports that should share one canonical answer or implementation path.,"Pick the canonical issue, preserve the strongest reproduction, and close/link duplicates in one maintainer pass.",medium,"issues #175293 and #86120 share title/component terms: does, not, work",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",27c46368ebd1c9df9cf75b1c8753c0677eb93fbc138db6677afb7d27dbb2ed10
+BUNDLE-882,bundle:bundle-882,duplicate_resolution_sweep,Duplicate/related issue sweep,evidence bundle,Duplicate/related issue sweep: module: power (2 issues),issue_group,,module: power needs triage queue (2 issues),module: power,"Compare 2 related reports, select a canonical thread, and close or link duplicates in one pass.","Reduces separate answers for issues that likely share a fix, answer, or reproduction.","No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"171870, 181638",,2,0,duplicate_consolidation,The local evidence indicates likely related reports that should share one canonical answer or implementation path.,"Pick the canonical issue, preserve the strongest reproduction, and close/link duplicates in one maintainer pass.",medium,"issues #171870 and #181638 share title/component terms: backend, compile, inductor, torch",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3373ad4febb5c02ecc1eeb53faba3a23ffadb4b5dfe831ecb0d02e07908a8edc
+BUNDLE-883,bundle:bundle-883,duplicate_resolution_sweep,Duplicate/related issue sweep,evidence bundle,Duplicate/related issue sweep: module: serialization (2 issues),issue_group,,module: serialization needs triage queue (2 issues),module: serialization,"Compare 2 related reports, select a canonical thread, and close or link duplicates in one pass.","Reduces separate answers for issues that likely share a fix, answer, or reproduction.","No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"46166, 82306",,2,0,duplicate_consolidation,The local evidence indicates likely related reports that should share one canonical answer or implementation path.,"Pick the canonical issue, preserve the strongest reproduction, and close/link duplicates in one maintainer pass.",medium,"issues #46166 and #82306 share title/component terms: error, model",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1ff1a58f232f38f88044f98e7691c436fa2ce1fcc6a087633d26c00fd8a05495
+BUNDLE-884,bundle:bundle-884,duplicate_resolution_sweep,Duplicate/related issue sweep,evidence bundle,Duplicate/related issue sweep: oncall: distributed (2 issues),issue_group,,oncall: distributed needs triage queue (2 issues),oncall: distributed,"Compare 2 related reports, select a canonical thread, and close or link duplicates in one pass.","Reduces separate answers for issues that likely share a fix, answer, or reproduction.","No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"130345, 179238",,2,0,duplicate_consolidation,The local evidence indicates likely related reports that should share one canonical answer or implementation path.,"Pick the canonical issue, preserve the strongest reproduction, and close/link duplicates in one maintainer pass.",medium,"issues #179238 and #130345 share title/component terms: backend, shutdown",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8ec18be6fece39d9b96387bd1cdd15aeecfbf9433c5de6edc038fcba6f9e5136
+BUNDLE-885,bundle:bundle-885,duplicate_resolution_sweep,Duplicate/related issue sweep,evidence bundle,Duplicate/related issue sweep: oncall: jit (2 issues),issue_group,,oncall: jit needs triage queue (2 issues),oncall: jit,"Compare 2 related reports, select a canonical thread, and close or link duplicates in one pass.","Reduces separate answers for issues that likely share a fix, answer, or reproduction.","No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"34116, 37015",,2,0,duplicate_consolidation,The local evidence indicates likely related reports that should share one canonical answer or implementation path.,"Pick the canonical issue, preserve the strongest reproduction, and close/link duplicates in one maintainer pass.",medium,"issues #37015 and #34116 share title/component terms: does, match, not",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",08f85a67dbca25e91e1c272bf73ca3c768109f54818e8f65d9d42930c39ed20e
+BUNDLE-886,bundle:bundle-886,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: general (34 issues),issue_group,,general has linked PR,general,Create one general fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for general paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"7887, 42652, 45808, 48972, 57724, 97635, 108784, 110944, 116882, 117032, 117962, 118263, 121791, 125388, 127882, 128283, 128380, 130641, 135693, 137260, 145827, 153564, 157709, 159224, 163650, 164478, 170944, 177021, 178049, 178145, 185295, 185581, 187974, 189279",,34,0,patch_plan_candidate,This general bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against src/, test/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #185581: has linked PR; labels: triaged; title: `torch.compile` fails at FakeTensor validation for ConvTranspose2d | issue #164478: has linked PR; labels: triaged, actionable; title: Out of date references in CONTRIBUTING.md and Wiki | issue #130641: has linked PR; labels: triaged, topic: docs; title: `dims` of `flip()` without `list` or `tuple` works with a tensor agaist the doc | issue #125388: has linked...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5bfd8702584641a4545d42b6bc3f2e65f1ed6863651f81ecfe3a0f4e346bb887
+BUNDLE-887,bundle:bundle-887,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: general (36 issues),issue_group,,feature needs design decision,general,Create one general fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for general paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"32584, 32662, 37067, 38155, 39780, 42581, 44024, 46153, 49338, 49870, 51275, 53464, 54827, 60936, 62152, 62644, 67835, 68864, 69448, 72105, 75265, 76954, 76955, 76956, 76959, 76960, 90138, 91970, 92794, 93900, 95677, 96555, 98142, 101880, 113730, 116354",,36,0,patch_plan_candidate,This general bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against src/, test/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #116354: needs design decision; labels: feature, triaged, needs research, needs design; title: Abstract torch.device for GPU/NE/TPU computations in the cloud-based agent | issue #113730: needs design decision; labels: feature, triaged, needs design; title: Can the official provide cpu offload method for large model inference? | issue #96555: needs design decision; labels: feature, triaged, needs design; titl...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",148e99e7f02b5398997175c6911ae822b4fa5e67da587830d77e66b95e2f85b7
+BUNDLE-888,bundle:bundle-888,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: 64-bit (4 issues),issue_group,,module: 64-bit has linked PR,module: 64-bit,Create one module: 64-bit fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: 64-bit paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"119147, 131185, 167086, 170798",,4,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: 64-bit bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #167086: has linked PR; labels: high priority, module: cuda, triaged, module: 64-bit; title: Unchecked uint32 overflow in CUDA scan (cumsum/cumprod/cummin/etc) | issue #170798: has linked PR; labels: module: nn, triaged, module: 64-bit, actionable, module: correctness (silent), module: edge cases; title: nn.functional.pad silently changes the padding value if input dtype is int64 and padding value is larger...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0969b5d2c4e59da5de0f393714c49386908ba77e0b35c4f25ee058d31936d148
+BUNDLE-889,bundle:bundle-889,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: __torch_dispatch__ (10 issues),issue_group,,module: __torch_dispatch__ needs design decision,module: __torch_dispatch__,Create one module: __torch_dispatch__ fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: __torch_dispatch__ paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"62982, 73513, 73537, 79205, 96319, 97500, 113089, 117115, 132651, 140909",,10,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: __torch_dispatch__ bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #132651: needs design decision; labels: triaged, needs design, module: __torch_dispatch__, tensor subclass, oncall: pt2, module: aotdispatch, module: compile-time, module: pt2-dispatcher; title: fix unnecessary re-trace in AOTDispatcher in subclass code path | issue #79205: needs design decision; labels: module: optimizer, triaged, needs research, module: __torch_dispatch__, tensor subclass; title: out-of-pl...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",34e98941599e6b8112b5a01b2393fcbf224a93b4582d991546d18d140bc39456
+BUNDLE-890,bundle:bundle-890,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: __torch_function__ (14 issues),issue_group,,module: __torch_function__ has linked PR,module: __torch_function__,Create one module: __torch_function__ fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: __torch_function__ paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"47117, 54881, 58212, 63485, 96579, 103752, 115741, 147995, 167223, 182318, 186203, 186259, 188684, 188686",,14,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: __torch_function__ bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #167223: has linked PR; labels: module: docs, module: autograd, triaged, actionable, module: __torch_function__; title: [feature request] Re-enable `__torch_function__` dispatch when invoking autograd hooks for Tensor subclasses | issue #182318: has linked PR; labels: triaged, has workaround, module: correctness (silent), module: __torch_function__, oncall: pt2, module: dynamo, module: graph breaks, bot-tria...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",81cbaa7abafc7ec2225f8a650b6f9f31a6f0d8e160760997c469507b250a3548
+BUNDLE-891,bundle:bundle-891,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: abi (4 issues),issue_group,,module: abi needs maintainer decision,module: abi,Create one module: abi fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: abi paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"103359, 121837, 124197, 174507",,4,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: abi bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #174507: needs maintainer decision; labels: feature, module: abi, triaged, bot-triaged; title: PyTorch Stable ABI support | issue #121837: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: binaries, module: cpp, module: abi, triaged; title: Revive libtorch-shared-without-deps flavor | issue #103359: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: build, module: abi, triaged; title: Libtorch compile error when defining D...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",dbe318e0963fb3546eef75da65e2931720ba29a7cea1e1f1359350d4a9f38758
+BUNDLE-892,bundle:bundle-892,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: accelerator (12 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #175211: CUDA/ROCm/Accelerator testing should replace get_device_capability() with feature queries,module: accelerator,Create one module: accelerator fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: accelerator paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"143887, 156805, 158827, 164302, 175211, 177010, 177771, 177935, 177969, 185975, 186260, 189014",,12,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: accelerator bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"I agreed, and a similar idea from #175211 | issue #185975: has linked PR; labels: feature, triaged, module: PrivateUse1, module: accelerator, bot-triaged; title: torch.accelerator.default_stream API is missing | our categories in a backend-agnostic way. And generalize the advanced runtime functionality, Graph capturing and replay, for accelerator on #158827. Today, generator APIs are still mostly backend-specific...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1312b5aa36ca41e1c62e72011a50a08d92e33affea195b03c0920958e8ea7413
+BUNDLE-893,bundle:bundle-893,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: accelerator (6 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 3 issues - issue #180343: Accelerator-independent API to determine if a specific backend is available?,module: accelerator,Create one module: accelerator fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: accelerator paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"166563, 167283, 167881, 180343, 180345, 180712",,6,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: accelerator bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"🚀 The feature, motivation and pitch This probably lands somewhere between #180343 and #180345, not sure if it is justified in having its own issue, but in TorchTPU we have set up autoloading of our tpu module, but we only | 🚀 The feature, motivation and pitch This probably lands somewhere between #180343 and #180345, not sure if it is justified in having its own issue, but in TorchTPU we have set up autoloading of...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3a9ae020aabd391ca714053636d1cc5241da99b3c6f457cde831fd71b36ebbfc
+BUNDLE-894,bundle:bundle-894,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: activation checkpointing (17 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 7 issues - issue #113045: [Feature][DTensor] Manage additional `_padded_local_tensor` attribute,module: activation checkpointing,Create one module: activation checkpointing fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: activation checkpointing paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"113045, 113737, 114299, 120003, 120945, 121594, 129867, 136433, 147662, 155547, 158657, 163923, 171355, 174960, 175306, 186572, 187615",,17,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: activation checkpointing bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"willing to work on this one here is one related issue #158657 | more. This is the natural continuation of the per-parameter FSDP direction (RFC #114299) and is adjacent to the activation-offload work in #174960, on the parameter axis rather than the activation axis. Proposed API @dataclass(frozen=True) class PartialOffloadPolicy(OffloadPol... | i OffloadManager: Batch-level offload/onload with ping-pong GPU buffer...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8f9f7b9e2e83079a780e856576660d2667c4b80f7ae6cfbab98e91e3d9de1d6d
+BUNDLE-895,bundle:bundle-895,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: advanced indexing (4 issues),issue_group,,"#180855 `""index_copy_cpu""` not implemented for `'Float8_e5m2'`",module: advanced indexing,Create one module: advanced indexing fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: advanced indexing paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"110946, 116555, 180855, 189046",,4,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: advanced indexing bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #180855: has linked PR; labels: module: cpu, triaged, enhancement, module: advanced indexing, module: floatx (formerly float8), bot-triaged; title: `""index_copy_cpu""` not implemented for `'Float8_e5m2'` | issue #189046: needs maintainer decision; labels: feature, module: autograd, triaged, module: advanced indexing, module: dispatch, module: backend, module: reductions, module: PrivateUse1, bot-triaged; titl...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ad6c2f2d6e7bbe1385cc0ce1e907ec41811a662d2498f0f51412f96b27aec1d8
+BUNDLE-896,bundle:bundle-896,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: amp (automated mixed precision) (26 issues),issue_group,,"Review thread: 15 issues - issue #104247: [proposal] ""Name"" string attribute for modules, parameters, buffers, tensors for more pleasant debugging (including distributed FSDP2 logging)",module: amp (automated mixed precision),Create one module: amp (automated mixed precision) fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: amp (automated mixed precision) paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"1529, 16668, 25267, 27479, 30049, 31252, 31353, 35633, 45273, 47128, 58228, 58392, 84321, 85652, 85698, 91692, 104247, 127176, 133924, 163688, 164455, 167656, 168976, 172383, 174763, 184890",,26,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: amp (automated mixed precision) bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"This is a very close duplicate of #31252, and there is a discussion going on already there. TL;DR it's complicated. | Related #31252 | @eellison My impression is that this is unrelated to #25267 given that I am not using MKL and I only encounter the CPU memory leak when the model is on GPU. Is there anything I can do to help you dia | @yushangdi seems similar to #168976? I think there's settings we should flip as...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c6b9a337fb28f67aab636d706f0da70818448967fe3e3a13e0ffb9521fb214c5
+BUNDLE-897,bundle:bundle-897,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: android (16 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 15 issues - issue #102078: AddressSanitizer: heap-buffer-overflow in test_comprehensive_nn_functional_embedding_bag_cpu_bfloat16,module: android,Create one module: android fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: android paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"88, 13993, 14436, 19668, 23240, 48491, 66247, 70245, 89817, 95944, 99561, 102078, 123421, 126963, 147141, 154449",,16,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: android bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,I have also seen the same issue in #66247 and had to resort to building my own PyTorch container with `USE_MKL=OFF` in order to resolve this issue. My stack trace was also similar t | 000004ea137 in PyCFunction_Call () at ../Objects/methodobject.c:98 #87 0x00000000005c20e7 in PyObject_Call () at ../Objects/abstract.c:2165 #88 0x0000000000534870 in PyEval_CallObjectWithKeywords () at ../Python/ceval.c:4580 #89 0x00...,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",fe7b30b29fcb9949227bfad86d7fc03a4ca32d267481cf7dda6498f69a749165
+BUNDLE-898,bundle:bundle-898,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: aotdispatch (27 issues),issue_group,,module: aotdispatch has linked PR,module: aotdispatch,Create one module: aotdispatch fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: aotdispatch paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"91469, 103650, 104053, 104146, 109237, 110485, 110700, 125977, 129964, 130028, 131974, 132896, 136092, 136272, 139152, 141349, 146994, 148811, 151142, 163716, 172213, 174970, 178883, 185296, 188222, 188232, 188390",,27,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: aotdispatch bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #188390: has linked PR; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, oncall: pt2, module: aotdispatch, module: dtensor, module: pt2-dispatcher, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed parallelisms; title: [DTensor][Compile][AOTAutograd cache] DTensor stable hashing generates identical AOTAutograd hash keys across ranks, causing false cache hits. | issue #185296: has linked PR; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, tensor...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a1818f8b70d52d5649b4b0d68a79aebc6693e7bc9e6738c94a00b049d822a6f5
+BUNDLE-899,bundle:bundle-899,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: aotdispatch (2 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #122540: [RFC] Solving Warm Start in torch.compile,module: aotdispatch,Create one module: aotdispatch fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: aotdispatch paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"122540, 125958",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: aotdispatch bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,Just as a reference in the case we have some fresh news to comment about point 2 #125958,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9c3c1df8857844d15e343654a34bf19898ae48c76a9ffc403c54bf799e947485
+BUNDLE-900,bundle:bundle-900,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: aotinductor (13 issues),issue_group,,module: aotinductor has linked PR,module: aotinductor,Create one module: aotinductor fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: aotinductor paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"144459, 151027, 169182, 180107, 180811, 186143, 186176, 187907, 189135, 189136, 189137, 189138, 189189",,13,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: aotinductor bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #151027: has linked PR; labels: triaged, oncall: pt2, module: inductor, oncall: export, module: aotinductor; title: Add size/strides/alignment assertions for cpp_wrapper | issue #186176: has linked PR; labels: module: serialization, triaged, has workaround, oncall: pt2, oncall: export, module: aotinductor, bot-triaged; title: AOTInductor serializes entire underlying storage for each constant tensor, causing...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",df4a4b080bd7e8602822ea10e5480f050a67cd9eab1b25824500585fbae9d909
+BUNDLE-901,bundle:bundle-901,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: arm (28 issues),issue_group,,module: arm has linked PR,module: arm,Create one module: arm fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: arm paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"55663, 64156, 71704, 72591, 78831, 104284, 104587, 125438, 125754, 125767, 133006, 137078, 154260, 154444, 157237, 162780, 168168, 168972, 169926, 170038, 170117, 171501, 173389, 174088, 174373, 177250, 179710, 186521",,28,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: arm bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #177250: has linked PR; labels: module: autograd, module: nn, triaged, module: arm, bot-triaged; title: AArch64 Unit Test Failure - TestNN test_upsampling_bfloat16 | issue #168972: has linked PR; labels: triaged, module: arm, oncall: pt2, module: inductor; title: Aarch64 unit test failures - test/test_cpu_repro.py CPUReproTests.test_float32_to_uint8 | issue #125438: has linked PR; labels: module: tests, tria...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",941ccab3427b7ed4253b893a3e9d8ae7faaed231c6dfa5415f21488a39a46c36
+BUNDLE-902,bundle:bundle-902,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: autograd (46 issues),issue_group,,module: autograd has linked PR,module: autograd,Create one module: autograd fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: autograd paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"4132, 67887, 76185, 80025, 86735, 91898, 94336, 106360, 117662, 126654, 138118, 138649, 140378, 144159, 144228, 144580, 149133, 150698, 153016, 154767, 155322, 155983, 158709, 160016, 160230, 161129, 162350, 162638, 174017, 175324, 177623, 178251, 179652, 181723, 182381, 184466, 184572, 184783, 185331, 185639, 186556, 187698, 188205, 188375, 188693, 189093",,46,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: autograd bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #144580: has linked PR; labels: module: autograd, triaged, actionable, module: mta; title: `torch._foreach_mul` does not support autograd | issue #186556: has linked PR; labels: module: windows, module: autograd, triaged, module: derivatives, module: correctness (silent), bot-triaged; title: torch.ldexp returns incorrect gradient w.r.t. mantissa for negative exponents | issue #184783: has linked PR; labels:...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",418cfd0bd717203ea6ee0c46847754b0dde550bf06b24a4122a4738035ae8948
+BUNDLE-903,bundle:bundle-903,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: autograd (28 issues),issue_group,,module: autograd needs maintainer decision batch 2,module: autograd,Create one module: autograd fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: autograd paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"52241, 68879, 71117, 89757, 92330, 95916, 96764, 96766, 100628, 102337, 102417, 109948, 110780, 111563, 114650, 119475, 120107, 127996, 128793, 131972, 134784, 152877, 158610, 171620, 172797, 174165, 174355, 177386",,28,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: autograd bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #52241: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: docs, module: autograd, module: loss, triaged; title: CTCLoss gradient is incorrect | issue #131972: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: autograd, triaged, module: determinism, actionable; title: backward of adaptive max pool (adaptive_max_pool2d_backward_cuda) doesn't have a deterministic implementation | issue #177386: needs maintainer decision; lab...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7865b385b527a3c4e94de73cc6d967f03da033b1c6c9d34339883cf8b454e488
+BUNDLE-904,bundle:bundle-904,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: autograd (20 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #133566: Performance: Autodiff stores inputs of convolution layers with non-trainable weight,module: autograd,Create one module: autograd fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: autograd paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"22597, 24397, 57796, 60923, 68699, 70702, 76798, 79877, 82217, 82218, 97135, 97575, 116490, 116589, 126141, 132378, 133566, 141832, 143259, 156616",,20,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: autograd bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"Related #97575 | re) but no one seems to have found a satisfying solution. I also looked at existing issues about this, and I found this very related issue: #132378. In this issue's case, a is_outputs_batched parameter would have elegantly solved the person's problem (although in their case th... | rue) x = torch.full((1, 1), 1.0) y = 2 * x y_pred = model(x) loss = criterion(y_pred, y) loss.backward() optimizer.st...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a07645ecdef8ffd1478ad0bfd0176dbbc1251aaa871f9421d260ee4b47c9c921
+BUNDLE-905,bundle:bundle-905,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: autograd (2 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #30900: CUDA error: initialization error (multiprocessing) with Python 3.7,module: autograd,Create one module: autograd fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: autograd paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"30900, 33248",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: autograd bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"either lack reproducibility or are classified as user error since the programmer attempts to use CUDA on multiple processes in a tree. See #30900, #2517 and #3491. In our environment, using spawn instead of fork to create the child processes does not resolve the issue. cc @ezy...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f0b6b045a90a8aaa2d822931b467872afac3dd43f4123f25cd78bcfe6a8c17cc
+BUNDLE-906,bundle:bundle-906,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: backend (12 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 4 issues - issue #174469: [RFC] Overview of Test Case Refactoring in PyTorch,module: backend,Create one module: backend fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: backend paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"77170, 77176, 133288, 174469, 176877, 177968, 178930, 185142, 185590, 187148, 188370, 188882",,12,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: backend bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"act same goal as this refactoring initiative and provide crucial underlying technical context, serving as perfect complements to this plan: #174469 #185142 Looking forward to great discussions and contributions in the Slack channel and PR reviews! cc @mruberry | es Decorator bypass extending DistTestCases.backend_feature so PrivateUse1 devices count as accelerators for GPU-count checks. Related RFC: #174469 5. Doc...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e5fcfa38254f1c41f5222c977b666ab544e2d102741f423125a5bd7cb3609c91
+BUNDLE-907,bundle:bundle-907,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: batching (1 issue),issue_group,,#173802 Batching rule of aten::_weight_norm,module: batching,Create one module: batching fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: batching paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,173802,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: batching bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #173802: needs maintainer decision; labels: feature, triaged, module: batching; title: Batching rule of aten::_weight_norm",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7f16b736bb42860c81ddeba09caf9f847a48476b19b17696fca36bf5c8113ecf
+BUNDLE-908,bundle:bundle-908,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: bazel (1 issue),issue_group,,#112903 Support for Bazel workspace function or Bazel module,module: bazel,Create one module: bazel fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: bazel paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,112903,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: bazel bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #112903: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: build, triaged, module: bazel; title: Support for Bazel workspace function or Bazel module",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9ab4d1741130f82859b66eefe924d1568b6b0c72f7930fe8a78379eb1a4e0800
+BUNDLE-909,bundle:bundle-909,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: bc-breaking (5 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 4 issues - issue #102730: Best practices clarification for initialization strategies,module: bc-breaking,Create one module: bc-breaking fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: bc-breaking paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"18182, 20102, 49227, 102730, 125861",,5,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: bc-breaking bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"Related to #18182 | Related long-standing issue: #18182 | There were also some related discussions on passing in keras-like weight init options to non-lazy modules as well: #18182 | issue #49227: needs design decision; labels: module: bc-breaking, triaged, module: numpy, needs design, topic: bc breaking; title: Looking for a more convenient way to getter value of the upper/lower triangular matrix into 1D",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f0c6a5934fb699852d6082eab47a81d3908aeffde132c733fd774672bf66bc07
+BUNDLE-910,bundle:bundle-910,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: benchmark (4 issues),issue_group,,module: benchmark needs maintainer decision,module: benchmark,Create one module: benchmark fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: benchmark paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"164593, 171376, 172495, 188851",,4,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: benchmark bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #188851: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: dependency bug, module: rocm, module: ci, triaged, module: benchmark, bot-triaged; title: [CI][ROCm] DebertaV2ForMaskedLM fails to import from transformers on gfx950 (dynamic_inductor_huggingface eager_fail_to_run) | issue #164593: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: ci, triaged, module: benchmark; title: [CI] Make sure B200 benchmark testing covers...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ee81313d967a443e6c363d9216a3ce79bfad545b013688a00b36d57e9ce6fa79
+BUNDLE-911,bundle:bundle-911,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: bfloat16 (13 issues),issue_group,,module: bfloat16 has linked PR,module: bfloat16,Create one module: bfloat16 fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: bfloat16 paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"75458, 90574, 95100, 117844, 120376, 121190, 153033, 163347, 170758, 175489, 177859, 181718, 187089",,13,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: bfloat16 bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #187089: has linked PR; labels: module: cpu, triaged, enhancement, module: bfloat16, module: tensor creation, bot-triaged; title: Support BFloat16 in ATen CPU tensor creation (tensor_cpu) | issue #175489: has linked PR; labels: module: nn, module: cpu, triaged, module: bfloat16, module: half, bot-triaged; title: CPU `F.interpolate(..., antialias=True)` raises NotImplementedError for bfloat16/float16 (bilinea...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0b3255fb026618fe7254ec891ebeb1986f1c1fa3ad9392bba11e09454b136510
+BUNDLE-912,bundle:bundle-912,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: binaries (39 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 4 issues - issue #44282: PyTorch wheel's own OpenMP library clashing with system-wide OpenMP library at runtime,module: binaries,Create one module: binaries fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: binaries paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"44282, 71381, 71545, 72712, 91989, 98836, 99625, 104259, 135508, 144071, 148169, 148345, 150655, 150742, 152355, 152783, 154299, 159207, 160261, 164883, 165798, 167411, 167818, 167833, 168362, 168897, 171092, 172628, 177050, 178196, 178368, 180215, 181565, 182008, 182272, 185746, 186905, 187824, 187834",,39,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: binaries bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"brary. As this is a cross project issue, I'm not sure what the best way is to coordinate with the other projects. This issue is related to: #44282, #19764 Versions Collecting environment information... PyTorch version: 2.0.0+cu117 Is debug build: False CUDA used to build PyTor... | 🐛 Describe the bug This issue may be related to #98836 and #91989. Background The issue arise when using PyTorch with Ray. The raylet...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d4562a00cc9d226322c71184722f7e50228fec3b4f36e017d180305badac0930
+BUNDLE-913,bundle:bundle-913,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: binaries (24 issues),issue_group,,module: binaries needs maintainer decision batch 2,module: binaries,Create one module: binaries fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: binaries paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"74282, 85211, 104598, 111896, 116931, 117469, 118172, 119461, 120606, 121222, 121287, 121646, 127560, 128939, 134993, 138821, 149953, 153996, 166628, 169429, 171194, 172351, 184352, 186099",,24,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: binaries bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #119461: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: binaries, triaged, module: docker; title: Promote pytorch nightly docker image | issue #74282: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: binaries, module: cudnn, triaged, module: vision; title: RuntimeError: cuDNN error: CUDNN_STATUS_VERSION_MISMATCH for torchvision models | issue #172351: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: binaries, module: cudnn,...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ae879fb72d9ceb950b6e72769403ef2204c545418bd449fc74dd62d109c156de
+BUNDLE-914,bundle:bundle-914,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: binaries (10 issues),issue_group,,module: binaries needs reproduction batch 3,module: binaries,Create one module: binaries fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: binaries paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"31004, 56928, 60094, 86919, 90115, 97865, 101331, 106126, 152790, 155066",,10,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: binaries bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #106126: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, module: binaries, module: cpp, triaged; title: Libtorch report C10 error when compiling on my own project | issue #101331: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, module: binaries, module: cuda, triaged; title: Pytorch 2.1.0.dev20230512 cuda not available | issue #97865: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, module: binaries, triaged;...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e9fe5ccd5836f50d0a113a32e8ef4c9e8629ff28ee87a8b032cf8098056ca96f
+BUNDLE-915,bundle:bundle-915,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: bootcamp (1 issue),issue_group,,#78842 Add TORCH_SHOW_CPP_STACKTRACES when TORCH_DISTRIBUTED_DEBUG = detail,module: bootcamp,Create one module: bootcamp fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: bootcamp paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,78842,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: bootcamp bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #78842: needs maintainer decision; labels: oncall: distributed, module: bootcamp, triaged, enhancement, pt_distributed_rampup, module: c10d, module: distributed_tool, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed infra, ptd-bot-triaged; title: Add TORCH_SHOW_CPP_STACKTRACES when TORCH_DISTRIBUTED_DEBUG = detail",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f59c63680be91306ecbfeb5535104b789fe2528425f44d12447d246526d0959e
+BUNDLE-916,bundle:bundle-916,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: build (24 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #125678: Unnecessary warning when numpy not installed,module: build,Create one module: build fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: build paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"50779, 60252, 89489, 110883, 111419, 113150, 115937, 120081, 125678, 127078, 128290, 133808, 134331, 143338, 151201, 152592, 153574, 158346, 158986, 173881, 174682, 177265, 182760, 186544",,24,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: build bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,".) cpu = _conversion_method_template(device=torch.device(""cpu"")) Apart from #115638 that already mentioned by OP, I also found an abandoned #60252 as well. I'm not installing Numpy since I don't use it. But the amount of warning from PyTorch is concerning. If PyTorch without N... | issue #186544: has linked PR; labels: module: build, module: windows, triaged, module: pybind, module: debug-build, bot-triaged; title...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",005d412c1ec408cb86de9a7cb70f69a816d1ba112980f418b9c94d57bfa92c11
+BUNDLE-917,bundle:bundle-917,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: build (67 issues),issue_group,,"Review thread: 22 issues - issue #10440: [caffe2] enforce fail at context_gpu.cu:285, cannot get GPU memory usage statistics",module: build,Create one module: build fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: build paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"6549, 6785, 6979, 7060, 7362, 7374, 7490, 7491, 7569, 7614, 7835, 8442, 8533, 8595, 9349, 9707, 9867, 10440, 10464, 10818, 11869, 12641, 14152, 28648, 56019, 61341, 65462, 65464, 65465, 70038, 74670, 75963, 84370, 86877, 87597, 89041, 94792, 101321, 101404, 103222, 108013, 110588, 113149, 126804, 128959, 144608, 149809, 153546, 155512, 155720, 159444, 165070, 167365, 167822, 172807, 172886, 175193, 177014, 178988, 181499, 181939, 184397, 185215, 185698, 186004, 186405, 188935",,67,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: build bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"removed from this repository. Evidence: The ""Remove Caffe2"" tracking issue (#72536) was closed in Oct 2024, and the umbrella removal issue (#128959) tracks the cleanup work. The caffe2/python/, caffe2/operators/, and caffe2/proto/ directories no longer exist in main — only caf... | issue #167822: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: build, triaged; title: [RFD] Composable Kernel (CK) moving to C++20 — reques...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c78f89f06818a1e7d75bb5e7de1bf30558fc2734a485e6b1609fa174671d4e64
+BUNDLE-918,bundle:bundle-918,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: build (8 issues),issue_group,,module: build needs reproduction batch 3,module: build,Create one module: build fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: build paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"14352, 19128, 20134, 21179, 30896, 36721, 46806, 114465",,8,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: build bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #46806: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, module: build, triaged; title: Compile Pytorch with MAGMA Issue | issue #36721: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, module: build, triaged; title: [1.4.1] Cuda build fails | issue #14352: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, module: build, triaged, has workaround; title: [libtorch] Catkin_make compilation error | issue #20134: nee...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8c6a7164bc014cad00c76677c02a85244e9691ad025b1147eae77f414d8052b3
+BUNDLE-919,bundle:bundle-919,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: c10d (42 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 11 issues - issue #103625: DISABLED test_backward_ddp_outside (__main__.TensorPipeDdpUnderDistAutogradTest),module: c10d,Create one module: c10d fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: c10d paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"15963, 16295, 51062, 58856, 64093, 69178, 69179, 72025, 72099, 72346, 72366, 72435, 72835, 74323, 74528, 74602, 74734, 76913, 76927, 77523, 92694, 94003, 103625, 104011, 113281, 115861, 119455, 120741, 124380, 124468, 132845, 137010, 139129, 142356, 151204, 162668, 166291, 177427, 178600, 178820, 186601, 187239",,42,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: c10d bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"14 #132447 #131446 #127373 #126868 #126852 #126493 #123294 DDP, FSDP, PiPPy FSDP1 #123726 #105024 FSDP2 #120961 DDP #106361 #104328 #104011 #103625 #77342 #77317 pipeline #121234 Other DCP #113937 #113936 Functional Collectives #107278 ShardedTensor #78068 cc @XilunWu @H-Huang... | Tcpstore #61671 #50701 MultiProcessing #65559 MultiThreadedTestCase #107425 #107424 #100459 #100448 RPC #125365 #74180 #70753 #70546 #...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",bf6a18ab7b6b9ab7004479f08096dec1bcad9964feb8d5fccf523e9f73f0ff2b
+BUNDLE-920,bundle:bundle-920,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: ci (41 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 14 issues - issue #154297: Hangs and timeouts on dist.reduce_scatter on B200 GPU,module: ci,Create one module: ci fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: ci paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"146094, 150779, 154297, 159520, 162178, 162745, 162748, 162820, 162871, 162897, 162917, 162940, 163429, 165170, 165685, 167616, 167994, 170278, 172217, 172321, 172427, 173950, 174220, 174930, 175022, 175829, 175899, 175994, 176687, 177135, 177425, 177896, 177970, 178345, 182336, 187158, 189032, 189065, 189164, 189261, 189262",,41,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: ci bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"Failure 2 will be fixed by #187371 which supersedes the previously flagged #187158 | Failures 1 and 3 are now passing, however failure 2 is still happening and it is reported as #187158 with open PR | cc @Aidyn-A I just saw your comment : #159323 (comment) and see you raised a similar issue recently #165170. The issue is not B200 specific as you've noted - I can reproduce this on a 8xH100. Also, I think it is rela...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b534db62accc81959dbc3a42852c0a8b27f08a66d957109d55d81a4f24f0d495
+BUNDLE-921,bundle:bundle-921,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: ci (8 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #140556: DISABLED test_backward_prod_cuda_float32 (__main__.TestNestedTensorOpInfoCUDA),module: ci,Create one module: ci fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: ci paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"83854, 110295, 125239, 140556, 142381, 160489, 165577, 189075",,8,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: ci bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"never completes. Genuine per-test failures in the same job (e.g. the test_backward_prod_cuda_float32 mem-leak-check, tracked separately in #140556) are a distinct problem from this timeout. Fix levers (CI-side) Increase the shard count (currently 8) so each shard's slice fits... | issue #165577: needs design decision; labels: module: ci, triaged, needs research; title: CI: What is the purpose of `slow.yml` | issue...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",264ac36a0789c6d3910a73d537857846a962aaf58a17d4dac9822eead5a6aa39
+BUNDLE-922,bundle:bundle-922,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: codegen (2 issues),issue_group,,#182450 Spin codegen run doesn't use self-contained environement,module: codegen,Create one module: codegen fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: codegen paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"61664, 182450",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: codegen bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #182450: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: lint, triaged, enhancement, module: codegen, bot-triaged, bot-mislabeled, module: spin; title: Spin codegen run doesn't use self-contained environement | issue #61664: needs design decision; labels: module: internals, triaged, module: codegen, needs design; title: Support adding new keyword-only parameters without breaking FC",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e75ad38b38c406f92864c3e2784da18dd51035ba3e90a9d3a048b612377dca1b
+BUNDLE-923,bundle:bundle-923,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: collect_env.py (2 issues),issue_group,,"#177819 MPS unavailable on macOS 26.3.1 arm64, and `device=""mps""` reports incorrect macOS requirement",module: collect_env.py,Create one module: collect_env.py fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: collect_env.py paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"144536, 177819",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: collect_env.py bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #177819: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, module: collect_env.py, triaged, module: macos, bot-triaged, bot-mislabeled; title: MPS unavailable on macOS 26.3.1 arm64, and `device=""mps""` reports incorrect macOS requirement | issue #144536: needs design decision; labels: module: collect_env.py, triaged, needs design; title: [bug report template format] Simplify version information with HTML tags",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0b59a87d04f36396ffa4c2da76ec812f7634b1efd8ad74269709057b435ea77f
+BUNDLE-924,bundle:bundle-924,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: compile ux (12 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 3 issues - issue #180284: Unused jvp function on autograd function causes inscrutable shape error,module: compile ux,Create one module: compile ux fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: compile ux paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"113800, 173621, 173642, 175229, 175484, 177830, 180284, 180824, 180845, 181851, 182641, 182661",,12,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: compile ux bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"ils, please see https://pytorch.org/docs/main/notes/extending.func.html so _DDPSink doesn't use the setup_context idiom. this is similar to #180284. | oducer for setting up a DDP model and jvp'ing through it. I also cannot try the same via FSDP2's replicate mode, because that's broken too (#182641). the consequence of these two errors is that there is no distributed way to train MeanFlow models. which is a shame b...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4a638609594207b4bc04409a13a8a773c1c8827051b04b0aac4eb85edc92cb49
+BUNDLE-925,bundle:bundle-925,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: compile-time (5 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #118492: `torch.compile(dynamic=True)` compiles forever,module: compile-time,Create one module: compile-time fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: compile-time paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"108971, 118492, 118798, 133734, 181428",,5,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: compile-time bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"🐛 Describe the bug Looking at #118492 and #118213 it occurs to me that if we are generating hundreds of guards involving a single symbolic variable, we probably should just give | issue #181428: needs maintainer decision; labels: triaged, oncall: pt2, module: functorch, module: dynamic shapes, module: inductor, module: compile-time, dynamo-functorch, bot-triaged; title: torch.compile + torch.func.grad: superlinear...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",da332912659096a88b79fb9606cb6699ef5ef586ebe531b8d130a2f3418241db
+BUNDLE-926,bundle:bundle-926,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: compiled autograd (1 issue),issue_group,,#173232 error C2872: 'std': ambiguous symbol when compiling `csrc/dynamo/compiled_autograd.h`,module: compiled autograd,Create one module: compiled autograd fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: compiled autograd paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,173232,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: compiled autograd bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #173232: has linked PR; labels: module: windows, triaged, oncall: pt2, module: compiled autograd; title: error C2872: 'std': ambiguous symbol when compiling `csrc/dynamo/compiled_autograd.h`",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",845a0294c6a6ea8d0d9c384edf0bd2857e2154c4cfa7c0d411494c78a05cfe3e
+BUNDLE-927,bundle:bundle-927,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: compiled streams (1 issue),issue_group,,#178132 torch.compile streams support in AOTI,module: compiled streams,Create one module: compiled streams fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: compiled streams paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,178132,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: compiled streams bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #178132: needs maintainer decision; labels: feature, triaged, oncall: pt2, module: inductor, bot-triaged, module: compiled streams; title: torch.compile streams support in AOTI",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a3098997453799468f7ef9b62ea1366aa9ad2c753219a87acf929337d2b71b62
+BUNDLE-928,bundle:bundle-928,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: complex (11 issues),issue_group,,module: complex has linked PR,module: complex,Create one module: complex fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: complex paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"67634, 95337, 99652, 127978, 138906, 139313, 146691, 184282, 184769, 187107, 187233",,11,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: complex bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #187107: has linked PR; labels: triaged, module: complex, enhancement, module: linear algebra, module: mps, bot-triaged; title: [MPS] linalg.lu_factor not implemented, causing RunTimeErrors on torch.linalg.det and torch.linalg.solve | issue #187233: has linked PR; labels: module: error checking, triaged, module: complex, module: pooling, module: mps, topic: fuzzer, bot-triaged; title: torch.nn.functional.max...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5cb5173700db9dc384f6c446a31d13d2bfa0b8d99b5687af1849f22db3e2c485
+BUNDLE-929,bundle:bundle-929,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: convolution (23 issues),issue_group,,module: convolution has linked PR,module: convolution,Create one module: convolution fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: convolution paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"3867, 47990, 74363, 80301, 99149, 120905, 130614, 133093, 143651, 169342, 169688, 170016, 170138, 175637, 177237, 177245, 177277, 178125, 178128, 178134, 178472, 178839, 188338",,23,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: convolution bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #169688: has linked PR; labels: needs reproduction, module: cuda, module: convolution, triaged; title: [CPU] Stride 3 bfloat16 convolutions appear incorrect | issue #188338: has linked PR; labels: module: rocm, module: convolution, triaged, enhancement, module: cuda graphs, bot-triaged; title: [ROCm]: CUDAGraph safe Convolutional Kernel e.g. `F.conv_transpose1d` | issue #178128: has linked PR; labels: module...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",dc3bf45b53d03a8d72edf27b385fa6eec198fe63fc00afda93b4fdd8daa16eff
+BUNDLE-930,bundle:bundle-930,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: convolution (10 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 7 issues - issue #153854: Better padding API,module: convolution,Create one module: convolution fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: convolution paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"28214, 29863, 46240, 52205, 57911, 60294, 115852, 116506, 144012, 153854",,10,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: convolution bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"ore last -> first) Convenient / consistent padding for a single dim or subset of dims Complete set of padding modes matching real use cases #57911 points out that PyTorch's circular padding mode only allows wrapping once, whereas numpy's wrap mode will wrap any number of times... | the last dimension and working back. Padding does not have to be specified for all dimensions. Proposed APIs: Match numpy's pad() API...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",be301fcb613fda85e731c6b86818b260067f161139a74eddf7c0eb1178d741c9
+BUNDLE-931,bundle:bundle-931,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: core aten (1 issue),issue_group,,"#137440 `torch.pow` throws with `RuntimeError: ""reciprocal_cuda"" not implemented for 'Char'`",module: core aten,Create one module: core aten fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: core aten paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,137440,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: core aten bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #137440: has linked PR; labels: module: cuda, low priority, triaged, actionable, module: core aten; title: `torch.pow` throws with `RuntimeError: ""reciprocal_cuda"" not implemented for 'Char'`",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f4ea43faa17f32037b7872eecd43d0e93715ad0afcf850999f54a46bca32fd6c
+BUNDLE-932,bundle:bundle-932,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: correctness (silent) (19 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #186241: TMA descriptor loads use stale `xoffset` in mix-order reduction loop,module: correctness (silent),Create one module: correctness (silent) fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: correctness (silent) paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"178593, 179608, 181806, 184031, 185246, 185248, 185464, 185696, 186241, 186824, 186826, 187175, 187295, 187296, 187338, 188420, 188425, 188430, 188432",,19,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: correctness (silent) bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"to it unconditionally. There are several recently filed issues that highlight the TMA path for pointwise/reduction is not yet fully mature: #186241 #185513 #185222 #184714 #184563 Phase 2 — Once we are confident the TMA path is correct and mature: Enabling autotuning alone (wi... | @Blooming-Tree I noticed that #188420, #188430, and #188432 appear to have the same methodology issue. They compare eager FP64 against...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",42394053c9c03a6a08783e7d0d6aac11cd3ba1509f84004d56f34540bec2cc7f
+BUNDLE-933,bundle:bundle-933,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: correctness (silent) (17 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #176296: [MPS] Binary ops on uint16/uint32/uint64 produce garbage values,module: correctness (silent),Create one module: correctness (silent) fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: correctness (silent) paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"65392, 126862, 137001, 137635, 137964, 151667, 154302, 154356, 157398, 163510, 169082, 170168, 176296, 176298, 178586, 180377, 181901",,17,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: correctness (silent) bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"ted for 'UInt16' print(a * b) # NotImplementedError: ""mul_stub"" not implemented for 'UInt16' Same for uint32 and uint64. Context Related to #176296 (same gap on MPS). PR #159094 added foundational support for these types but binary op kernels were not registered on either back... | ) or torch could throw an error here too. If anyone has any thoughts on this, please let me know and I can add a this check. (related...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5dec2d7a590b3fc533d34912101fb909c55fa1ac1205395f656953bddc50efc5
+BUNDLE-934,bundle:bundle-934,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: correctness (silent) (21 issues),issue_group,,module: correctness (silent) needs maintainer decision batch 1,module: correctness (silent),Create one module: correctness (silent) fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: correctness (silent) paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"152028, 159155, 160740, 163327, 164563, 165987, 170837, 173638, 176091, 176625, 177654, 178482, 178614, 182960, 183607, 183768, 185587, 187180, 187227, 187715, 188074",,21,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: correctness (silent) bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #160740: needs maintainer decision; labels: triaged, module: correctness (silent), module: mps; title: MPS torch.argmax/torch.argmin fail for non-contiguous input | issue #188074: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: nn, triaged, module: determinism, module: correctness (silent), oncall: pt2, module: dynamo, bot-triaged; title: torch.compile produces inconsistent outputs for stateful SNN model with cus...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",20f35a70bc1a2058cc2195f42b7f780649ff7978f24bb9e9edbc019ef99775e9
+BUNDLE-935,bundle:bundle-935,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: cpp (18 issues),issue_group,,module: cpp has linked PR,module: cpp,Create one module: cpp fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: cpp paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"19029, 27694, 30507, 59628, 82546, 100990, 107224, 108794, 114572, 122707, 133860, 150857, 157776, 163974, 176153, 177520, 177738, 186233",,18,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: cpp bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #186233: has linked PR; labels: module: crash, module: cpp, triaged, module: tensor creation, module: edge cases, bot-triaged; title: C++ API: at::range crashes due to division-by-zero in RangeFactories.cpp | issue #157776: has linked PR; labels: module: cpp, triaged, enhancement, actionable; title: Support for _Float16/C++23 std::float16_t | issue #150857: has linked PR; labels: module: cpp, module: seriali...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ff1bb3c119ca489317cea4c8dce1a5415a0478495298c21a09f9d7bb5c45ba14
+BUNDLE-936,bundle:bundle-936,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: cpp-extensions (9 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #180762: torch.utils.cpp_extension.load should support CUDA device linking (-dlink) similar to CUDAExtension,module: cpp-extensions,Create one module: cpp-extensions fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: cpp-extensions paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"44279, 84782, 127445, 151310, 155344, 158032, 166123, 166633, 180762",,9,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: cpp-extensions bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"allelism / device linking support for custom PyTorch CUDA extensions #78225 added relocatable device code linking support for CUDAExtension #44279 shows user confusion around how to achieve this in cpp extensions, especially for JIT-like workflows Expected outcome: JIT cpp ext... | issue #166633: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, module: cpp-extensions, module: cuda, triaged; title: Command '['ninja'...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",fea4edf77075838c773d9d01402c79ecce2cbb917283253f0a84987e53bac941
+BUNDLE-937,bundle:bundle-937,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: cpu (22 issues),issue_group,,module: cpu has linked PR,module: cpu,Create one module: cpu fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: cpu paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"41556, 75949, 125223, 127163, 132446, 136748, 140000, 140970, 143800, 146508, 170370, 170743, 173922, 173946, 174266, 176274, 177599, 180650, 181510, 183686, 186618, 188926",,22,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: cpu bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #181510: has linked PR; labels: module: crash, module: nn, module: cpu, triaged, module: vectorization, module: sanitizers, module: edge cases, module: empty tensor, topic: fuzzer, bot-triaged; title: torch.nn.utils.weight_norm triggers a UBSan null pointer error for nn.Linear(0, 1) on CPU | issue #173946: has linked PR; labels: module: crash, module: rnn, module: cpu, module: error checking, triaged, bot-tr...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8f01459ce01b9d0843729fdc472167e3c4c9074a39e357652197cb902e3275f6
+BUNDLE-938,bundle:bundle-938,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: crash (10 issues),issue_group,,module: crash has linked PR,module: crash,Create one module: crash fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: crash paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"21018, 27614, 50804, 75912, 184032, 184876, 185482, 187399, 188033, 188231",,10,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: crash bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #188033: has linked PR; labels: high priority, module: crash, module: cuda, module: error checking, triaged, module: pybind, actionable, security, bot-triaged; title: [BUG] THPStream_richcompare casts arbitrary objects to THPStream* without type check | issue #188231: has linked PR; labels: module: crash, triaged, oncall: pt2, module: inductor, bot-triaged; title: [inductor] `TypeError: A Boolean argument ca...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4600781d7cd3e8f755585843d6d1d96307f478c9d515095f40fadfcb859881c6
+BUNDLE-939,bundle:bundle-939,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: cublas (9 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #173382: Make torch.cuda.empty_cache() actually empty the GPU cache,module: cublas,Create one module: cublas fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: cublas paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"52515, 70519, 107276, 130253, 172231, 173382, 174949, 181737, 184084",,9,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: cublas bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"ction is documented in docs/source/notes/cuda.rst but only as a private API Related issues about incomplete memory release: #17157, #46602, #173382, #20837 cc @ptrblck @msaroufim @eqy @jerryzh168 @tinglvv @nWEIdia @csarofeen | issue #130253: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, module: cuda, triaged, module: cublas; title: RuntimeError: CUDA error: CUBLAS_STATUS_EXECUTION_FAILED when calling `cublasGemm...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",24918819f6a31db4a8d90d0768b2ad6338fa5ae77d2a9c2ab007b3d1ff356913
+BUNDLE-940,bundle:bundle-940,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: cuda (39 issues),issue_group,,module: cuda has linked PR,module: cuda,Create one module: cuda fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: cuda paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"44777, 45295, 81333, 85960, 103584, 109052, 115993, 124296, 131881, 133548, 137680, 141678, 152875, 153172, 153825, 156010, 156424, 159594, 161104, 162957, 164342, 165650, 170676, 170955, 171499, 171804, 172500, 173049, 173315, 173476, 174010, 174625, 177020, 177028, 177827, 181805, 182277, 183806, 188411",,39,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: cuda bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #183806: has linked PR; labels: high priority, module: performance, module: cuda, triaged, module: regression, module: linear algebra, module: magma, bot-triaged; title: `torch.linalg.eig` and `torch.linalg.eigh` 30-130x slower on 2.11.0+cu130 vs 2.5.1+cu124 | issue #181805: has linked PR; labels: module: cuda, triaged, module: python frontend; title: torch.fmax with uint8 out produces inconsistent overflow...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",96f5fe59463f80516dd5f1237ff6ec451aa1be3458af605a34275acae5dc11b8
+BUNDLE-941,bundle:bundle-941,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: cuda (58 issues),issue_group,,module: cuda needs maintainer decision batch 4,module: cuda,Create one module: cuda fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: cuda paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"28224, 34242, 53721, 60541, 68506, 76632, 104695, 104701, 111824, 120902, 127605, 130330, 131754, 136187, 136567, 143281, 147478, 147971, 150725, 153122, 153460, 153555, 154077, 157456, 159113, 159547, 164015, 167353, 169015, 170535, 171398, 173290, 173516, 173729, 173904, 174227, 174983, 175311, 175409, 175636, 175737, 177477, 177578, 177910, 178052, 178864, 179124, 179152, 179745, 179798, 181094, 181379, 182001, 182286, 183391, 186213, 187045, 188705",,58,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: cuda bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #53721: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: cuda, triaged; title: PyTorch on Embedded Hardware | issue #170535: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: cuda, triaged, module: cuda graphs, PT2-Bug-Bash; title: Graphsafe RNG clone_state | issue #175311: needs maintainer decision; labels: feature, module: cuda, triaged, oncall: pt2, module: inductor, module: helion, bot-triaged; title: [RFC][Inductor]...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e3da39ec4f8e98ac6e3a72f16a1b4ebe1ea052285a1d1a5abd7c946fa5259893
+BUNDLE-942,bundle:bundle-942,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: cuda (48 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #174496: Improve performance of torch._foreach_copy_ on CUDA tensors,module: cuda,Create one module: cuda fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: cuda paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"24398, 25190, 35754, 49832, 51156, 54138, 54139, 54487, 54799, 54975, 56771, 57794, 58036, 58135, 59883, 63847, 64560, 64889, 65027, 70048, 73568, 81257, 86547, 90521, 90752, 91072, 97847, 109193, 110701, 112569, 113035, 114534, 121067, 125911, 126775, 128131, 130486, 130728, 138208, 139884, 140096, 141465, 143905, 149279, 152135, 159309, 174496, 175695",,48,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: cuda bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"I first noticed this here #174496 (comment) I am making a separate issue becuase I plan to solve #174496 in a stacked PR on top of a PR to solve this specific issue. Essenti | .asarray(a_tensor) will prefer the new __array_interface__ attribute over Tensor.__array__. It's not clear to me that what I pointed out in #51156 (comment), // TODO: This attempts to keep the underlying memory alive by setting the base // o...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c71e73138252cead68e29b8a879af7f88c5500bf2cdfb7ae97d5da0d4d574074
+BUNDLE-943,bundle:bundle-943,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: cuda (10 issues),issue_group,,module: cuda needs reproduction batch 5,module: cuda,Create one module: cuda fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: cuda paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"4334, 26400, 28956, 30830, 31660, 32443, 35870, 37057, 49669, 52307",,10,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: cuda bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #52307: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, module: cuda, triaged; title: Model produces same outputs for different inputs when using GPU | issue #49669: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, module: cuda, triaged, module: deadlock; title: While training the model, GPU util reaches 100% but no progress happends. | issue #35870: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, module: cud...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1921e8aea03d5500209585726c8f8d2359035f9f05ca2cc224e95c1dcdb60e25
+BUNDLE-944,bundle:bundle-944,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: cuda graphs (13 issues),issue_group,,#175001 torch.cond() and cuda graph mega issue,module: cuda graphs,Create one module: cuda graphs fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: cuda graphs paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"122192, 131009, 155679, 158551, 167766, 170241, 171672, 175001, 176611, 177719, 180960, 188677, 188837",,13,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: cuda graphs bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #175001: has linked PR; labels: triaged, module: cuda graphs, oncall: pt2, module: higher order operators, module: pt2-dispatcher, bot-triaged, PT2-Bug-Bash; title: torch.cond() and cuda graph mega issue | issue #122192: needs design decision; labels: triaged, needs design, module: cuda graphs, oncall: pt2, module: inductor, repro:agent:h100:repro_success:reproduced, agents-banned; title: extra checks for re...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",310401b10bd012d2244309d3872c8713fa1fc2c13938e852f6c1a1f93df5acbf
+BUNDLE-945,bundle:bundle-945,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: cudacachingallocator (1 issue),issue_group,,#173104 Crash with `CUDACachingAllocator.cpp` when running Nvidia `nemotron-parse` at load,module: cudacachingallocator,Create one module: cudacachingallocator fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: cudacachingallocator paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,173104,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: cudacachingallocator bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #173104: needs maintainer decision; labels: triaged, module: CUDACachingAllocator; title: Crash with `CUDACachingAllocator.cpp` when running Nvidia `nemotron-parse` at load",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5199b1f4c9d2cd4dc9592ffcb2541665bd899f99acff92450707166e81e8251e
+BUNDLE-946,bundle:bundle-946,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: cudnn (3 issues),issue_group,,#170762 [BUG][Inconsistency] aten.cudnn_batch_norm_backward produces numerical mismatch between eager and inductor,module: cudnn,Create one module: cudnn fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: cudnn paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"105941, 170524, 170762",,3,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: cudnn bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #170762: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: cudnn, triaged, oncall: pt2, module: inductor, repro:agent:h100:repro_fail:not_reproduced; title: [BUG][Inconsistency] aten.cudnn_batch_norm_backward produces numerical mismatch between eager and inductor | issue #170524: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, module: cudnn, triaged, module: third_party; title: RuntimeError occurred when I train “R...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a5e1803bd878434a62983bb30acdc61dd2218ab5a7786ba7a40d39d8031685a2
+BUNDLE-947,bundle:bundle-947,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: custom-operators (24 issues),issue_group,,"Review thread: 3 issues - issue #139500: Custom operators registered via decorator slower than ops registered via `torch.Library.{define, impl}`",module: custom-operators,Create one module: custom-operators fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: custom-operators paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"113022, 127621, 129395, 139257, 139444, 139500, 139518, 142388, 143579, 146936, 149559, 152270, 155240, 158186, 160472, 176592, 177109, 180206, 180620, 185046, 186140, 187470, 187505, 187862",,24,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: custom-operators bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"known issue, duplicate of #139500 | Function | custom op 1 threads: ----------------------------------- f(x) | 25.0 | 88.3 Times are in microseconds (us). Potential related to #139500 (but #139500 seems tailored more towards inference setting). cc: @riccardofelluga Versions main cc @jerryzh168 @chauhang @penguin... | This came up when I was investigating #139500 (and in parallel @ezyang hypothesized about boxing v...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d4bac5b9f63c6369d96ecad3845c188a5424f6fa46dc78f1ac992c19f45c70fc
+BUNDLE-948,bundle:bundle-948,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: custom-operators (3 issues),issue_group,,module: custom-operators needs maintainer decision batch 2,module: custom-operators,Create one module: custom-operators fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: custom-operators paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"125030, 138355, 164696",,3,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: custom-operators bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #164696: needs maintainer decision; labels: triaged, module: custom-operators, function request, oncall: pt2, module: inductor, module: pt2-dispatcher; title: Support torch._inductor.config.inplace_buffers for custom_op whenever possible | issue #138355: needs maintainer decision; labels: feature, triaged, module: custom-operators, oncall: pt2, oncall: fx, module: pt2-dispatcher; title: tlparse's fx_graph_ru...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e72d833757ac04655731f6e5b56c4c1a97cd24fd7c1d3c5f76bb43ad432794f9
+BUNDLE-949,bundle:bundle-949,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: data (5 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #106704: Dataloader extremely slow on in-memory datasets,module: data,Create one module: data fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: data paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"67740, 106704, 143471, 154318, 158714",,5,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: data bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"ass Time: 4.772 seconds I have to reduce to batch size since DataLoader fails to complete due to unexpected bus error Versions 2.7 Relevant #106704 cc @msaroufim @jerryzh168 @andrewkho @divyanshk @ssnl @VitalyFedyunin @dzhulgakov | issue #158714: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: dataloader, triaged, module: multithreading, module: data; title: Feature request: `DataLoader` using multithreading instead of...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",880b83b41c3ab4ad6226de58c98cfabdd3f1c6e3cac043c91574a6aac730f0f2
+BUNDLE-950,bundle:bundle-950,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: data parallel (10 issues),issue_group,,module: data parallel needs maintainer decision,module: data parallel,Create one module: data parallel fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: data parallel paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"36649, 44855, 69966, 90052, 91629, 101402, 107133, 114437, 141482, 156392",,10,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: data parallel bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #114437: needs maintainer decision; labels: oncall: distributed, module: dataloader, triaged, module: data parallel, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed parallelisms, ptd-bot-triaged; title: [Help Needed] [DataParallel/DataLoader/AMP] Severe slowdown on large dataset with fp16 precision and DataParallel wrapper | issue #90052: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: performance, oncall: distributed, triaged,...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e3ed2fbdbf81134b999790e9517762815787dd812b7d735e9d4d70716342192d
+BUNDLE-951,bundle:bundle-951,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: dataloader (22 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #124275: Performance Impact of `torch.autograd.profiler.record_function` in DataLoader's `_BaseDataLoaderIter` Iteration,module: dataloader,Create one module: dataloader fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: dataloader paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"2539, 20822, 23430, 28950, 34130, 45728, 47037, 54716, 55035, 61660, 72107, 76410, 77154, 91245, 124275, 158704, 165532, 173661, 176166, 179707, 179979, 186908",,22,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: dataloader bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"This seems to be caused by the call to torch.ops.profiler._record_function_enter_new. Might be related to #76410. | issue #165532: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, module: dataloader, triaged; title: PyTorch CPU / DataLoader: “Too many open files” (`EMFILE`) | issue #2539: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, module: dataloader, triaged; title: DataLoader converts cuda FloatTensor into cp...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d945e9dc3859bcf5b3da7994ac7b3d5ad6ea1447a13a02d5db63bb65ed283238
+BUNDLE-952,bundle:bundle-952,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: ddp (38 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 5 issues - issue #158698: [fsdp2] Possible to fuse reduce-scatter (in fp32) + div + dtype conversion (to bf16) in post-backward?,module: ddp,Create one module: ddp fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: ddp paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"50803, 69431, 86456, 88006, 88251, 89546, 89716, 90171, 90688, 91408, 92801, 95724, 98542, 99908, 99978, 100582, 102197, 102438, 103622, 104164, 105723, 109103, 111834, 112029, 112277, 114765, 114857, 114861, 121181, 124680, 135511, 140107, 152042, 155993, 158698, 158710, 179128, 187298",,38,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: ddp bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"Maybe related: #69431 #88540 | Could this be related? #158698 Maybe not related to HSDP, but this also increases peak memory (as reduction is first done in fp32 buffer, and then a separate bf16 buffer | itemsize, a.nbytes) b = to_(a, torch.bfloat16) print(b, b.dtype, b.dtype.itemsize, b.nbytes) Or might be better to model this as torch.to_: #69431 | 🚀 The feature, motivation and pitch Motivated by: #158698 It's so...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4f629f79d8c75dde1801e317d159a0f827bda3c89f431f72de7c043ccb85507d
+BUNDLE-953,bundle:bundle-953,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: ddp (18 issues),issue_group,,module: ddp needs maintainer decision batch 1,module: ddp,Create one module: ddp fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: ddp paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"73081, 74162, 75031, 76389, 80496, 80595, 81383, 82153, 135358, 143647, 143721, 156130, 157862, 159836, 163722, 166523, 187276, 187279",,18,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: ddp bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #187279: needs maintainer decision; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: ddp, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed parallelisms; title: Two-node DDP shows reproducible FP32 loss divergence between CPU/Gloo and CUDA/NCCL with large lr and resnet18 | issue #187276: needs maintainer decision; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: ddp, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed parallelisms; title: Two-node D...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9b6d27c629cdddfd0db61758fd8666dabf925c893fa15754d027567a75e05134
+BUNDLE-954,bundle:bundle-954,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: deadlock (5 issues),issue_group,,module: deadlock needs maintainer decision,module: deadlock,Create one module: deadlock fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: deadlock paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"25904, 113228, 144634, 162872, 174359",,5,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: deadlock bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #113228: needs maintainer decision; labels: triaged, module: deadlock, release notes: dataloader; title: dataloader use lmdb stuck | issue #162872: needs maintainer decision; labels: triaged, module: deadlock, module: mps; title: [MPS] dead lock when calling `Event.synchronize()` before `Event.elapsed_time()` | issue #174359: needs maintainer decision; labels: triaged, module: deadlock, module: multithreadin...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4caeb00261edadb9faa1b831df6af7a7d3014cb9d690a0a262e298136dbbfe4b
+BUNDLE-955,bundle:bundle-955,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: decompositions (2 issues),issue_group,,module: decompositions has linked PR,module: decompositions,Create one module: decompositions fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: decompositions paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"137546, 185543",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: decompositions bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #185543: has linked PR; labels: triaged, module: derivatives, oncall: pt2, module: decompositions, module: inductor, bot-triaged; title: [inductor] Gradient mismatch between eager and inductor for torch.quantile on tied values | issue #137546: has linked PR; labels: triaged, module: linear algebra, module: decompositions; title: `torch.linspace` doesn't agree with decomposition.",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",487284116635f9f3dca2a74748f4c943bb74649f1170efb21f030c28a5ced846
+BUNDLE-956,bundle:bundle-956,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: dependency bug (3 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #101850: Unexpected modification to CPU affinity of Dataloader workers,module: dependency bug,Create one module: dependency bug fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: dependency bug paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"17023, 101850, 102269",,3,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: dependency bug bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"trying to find what difference in setup/architecture is causing this weird behavior. Thanks in advance for any help Possible duplicate of: #101850, but also breaks normal multiprocessing Versions $ python collect_env.py Collecting environment information... PyTorch version: 2.... | issue #17023: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: dependency bug, triaged; title: Download speed issues with the pytorch conda...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c25d2348762e92444872e37d6b2f70d24935606b852a34ec7bb7fe10d11e4799
+BUNDLE-957,bundle:bundle-957,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: derivatives (1 issue),issue_group,,#89459 Higher order derivatives of sinc explode,module: derivatives,Create one module: derivatives fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: derivatives paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,89459,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: derivatives bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #89459: has linked PR; labels: triaged, module: derivatives, actionable; title: Higher order derivatives of sinc explode",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5ca123ddcdd1c898fa23a0f88b703ea77c8f896387adf534a214a2d93f9aaab2
+BUNDLE-958,bundle:bundle-958,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: determinism (8 issues),issue_group,,module: determinism needs maintainer decision,module: determinism,Create one module: determinism fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: determinism paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"57491, 71222, 88096, 94855, 166856, 172475, 174711, 175478",,8,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: determinism bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #88096: needs maintainer decision; labels: triaged, module: determinism; title: Add nondeterministic alert to `torch.Tensor.scatter()` | issue #174711: needs maintainer decision; labels: feature, triaged, module: determinism, oncall: pt2, module: inductor; title: add an alternative to compile time benchmarking in inductor for determinism that is reasonably performant | issue #175478: needs maintainer decisio...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",aa0738ed0178c6b3b78136103f10e14fe789476c8cbd77e66f4113efe320466d
+BUNDLE-959,bundle:bundle-959,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: devicemesh (2 issues),issue_group,,module: devicemesh needs maintainer decision,module: devicemesh,Create one module: devicemesh fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: devicemesh paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"154787, 161776",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: devicemesh bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #161776: needs maintainer decision; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: fsdp, module: DeviceMesh, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed parallelisms, ptd-bot-triaged; title: FSDP&device_mesh Mesh_dim_names in init_device_mesh not work | issue #154787: needs maintainer decision; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: dtensor, module: DeviceMesh, oncall: distributed checkpointing, bot-triaged, ptd-...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f8dd1be2bb5f05c0b5c8905f05cc1894e4c2775bf52458932c496a4834086b3b
+BUNDLE-960,bundle:bundle-960,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: devx (6 issues),issue_group,,module: devx needs maintainer decision,module: devx,Create one module: devx fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: devx paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"115273, 118133, 167775, 177322, 186939, 188446",,6,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: devx bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #188446: needs maintainer decision; labels: feature, triaged, module: devx, bot-triaged; title: Add issue de-duplication system | issue #186939: needs maintainer decision; labels: triaged, module: devx; title: pitch: fast development mode where we use pre-build nightly .so files | issue #167775: needs maintainer decision; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, enhancement, module: devx, bot-triaged, oncall: d...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a681a33dcfeced12e15df593718e8c5959ee032b96d10611d098974ff7a4d8bb
+BUNDLE-961,bundle:bundle-961,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: dispatch (4 issues),issue_group,,#188052 Allow PrivateUse1 backends to opt out of CompositeExplicitAutograd decomposition,module: dispatch,Create one module: dispatch fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: dispatch paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"26207, 88109, 172944, 188052",,4,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: dispatch bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #188052: has linked PR; labels: feature, triaged, module: dispatch, module: PrivateUse1, bot-triaged; title: Allow PrivateUse1 backends to opt out of CompositeExplicitAutograd decomposition | issue #172944: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, triaged, module: dispatch; title: Tried to access the schema for which doesn't have a schema registered yet | issue #88109: needs maintainer decision; label...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3549888b0cd2304b55c00d70d98b387ff6f0ed9d6e40cb9fbfbb3aee77163ed7
+BUNDLE-962,bundle:bundle-962,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: distance functions (1 issue),issue_group,,#59194 Add numerically-stable function for angle between vectors,module: distance functions,Create one module: distance functions fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: distance functions paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,59194,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: distance functions bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #59194: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: numerical-stability, triaged, enhancement, module: distance functions; title: Add numerically-stable function for angle between vectors",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",38aff600a820cbdad1f6fd9e7a9737c7f6954c775e866ac8024ceafd8321c37b
+BUNDLE-963,bundle:bundle-963,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: distributed_tool (3 issues),issue_group,,module: distributed_tool needs maintainer decision,module: distributed_tool,Create one module: distributed_tool fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: distributed_tool paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"108212, 126302, 162755",,3,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: distributed_tool bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #162755: needs maintainer decision; labels: oncall: distributed, module: tests, triaged, enhancement, module: distributed_tool, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed infra, ptd-bot-triaged; title: Ideally, we should not use `require_exact_world_size(4)` if we only have 8-GPU runners | issue #126302: needs maintainer decision; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, enhancement, module: distributed_tool, bot-triaged...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5fbb9d6bfd3b9ed697aafe810f262853cfe50e874f0aa5c69e9fd22c35c16387
+BUNDLE-964,bundle:bundle-964,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: distributions (14 issues),issue_group,,module: distributions needs maintainer decision,module: distributions,Create one module: distributions fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: distributions paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"31779, 35527, 45133, 72525, 102938, 133702, 136532, 145679, 152095, 157547, 171283, 172059, 179430, 186825",,14,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: distributions bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #145679: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: distributions, triaged; title: Gamma cdf function | issue #179430: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: distributions, feature, triaged, function request, bot-triaged; title: Add Frechet/Inverse Weibull distribution | issue #133702: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: distributions, triaged; title: Add `beta`, `betainc`, etc. to `torch.special`...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f99ce20adfb9ef8aafeeda74827f2f90c84663416207c77b081af5fe45225ba0
+BUNDLE-965,bundle:bundle-965,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: docs (38 issues),issue_group,,module: docs has linked PR batch 1,module: docs,Create one module: docs fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: docs paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"32864, 41226, 62027, 83494, 86558, 103841, 112586, 113669, 121587, 123800, 129319, 129970, 131280, 132020, 133511, 134964, 144779, 145555, 152213, 157395, 158775, 161847, 170869, 171866, 172324, 173318, 175479, 176065, 177957, 180119, 180467, 180649, 182490, 183036, 186496, 188245, 188389, 188398",,38,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: docs bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #173318: has linked PR; labels: high priority, module: docs, triaged, module: regression; title: [docs] `torch.cuda.Stream` link broken on 2.10+ | issue #188398: has linked PR; labels: module: docs, triaged, actionable, bot-triaged; title: [Docs] torch.utils.mobile_optimizer link broken in 2.7 API documentation | issue #188245: has linked PR; labels: module: docs, triaged, actionable; title: Broken tutorial...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",37d553cef5e29bc09123bd3c2513b0cebeee432d6590dacd110aec53eee3b75f
+BUNDLE-966,bundle:bundle-966,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: docs (15 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #164281: Document Symmetric Memory,module: docs,Create one module: docs fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: docs paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"41559, 62155, 67969, 68798, 71392, 99421, 105318, 106664, 129338, 150432, 151558, 151559, 151561, 164281, 173514",,15,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: docs bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"nsistency Would this address the concerns raised in the issue? I'd be happy to open a draft PR if this approach looks good! Also, regarding #164281 - should that be closed as part of this work, or handled separately? Thanks! | a memory pool is used : it would be good to add this to that section as well (maybe through a link). While looking for this, I noticed that #164281 is still open but I believe it can be clos...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",68df02a278c8ab0eeaa0b50d1eb3120a44e59458bc2d6e5d3c733e027fc06c01
+BUNDLE-967,bundle:bundle-967,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: docs (4 issues),issue_group,,module: docs needs reproduction,module: docs,Create one module: docs fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: docs paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"39832, 103423, 103424, 166303",,4,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: docs bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #166303: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, module: docs, triaged; title: Pytorch Operators on older pytorch version | issue #103424: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, module: docs, triaged; title: The document does not emphasize hidden range in nn.Embedding | issue #103423: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, module: docs, triaged; title: The document does not emphasiz...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",679e58dd1037590b7b545d8cbe0284fa440b13a6a3938488ee372c2bdb83b604
+BUNDLE-968,bundle:bundle-968,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: double backwards (1 issue),issue_group,,#183603 torch.compile fails on second-order gradient after autograd.grad(create_graph=True),module: double backwards,Create one module: double backwards fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: double backwards paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,183603,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: double backwards bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #183603: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: double backwards, triaged, oncall: pt2, bot-triaged; title: torch.compile fails on second-order gradient after autograd.grad(create_graph=True)",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",10e3a98cd8344135d22054eac5071cbf619a77b5d7ab95ced4a3dd8f4ec3a84a
+BUNDLE-969,bundle:bundle-969,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: dtensor (60 issues),issue_group,,module: dtensor has linked PR,module: dtensor,Create one module: dtensor fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: dtensor paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"108744, 109477, 116683, 118094, 119930, 120158, 120787, 124019, 127772, 135178, 139681, 140227, 143748, 143985, 145218, 146045, 146601, 146884, 153615, 155562, 155657, 156523, 156533, 156842, 159959, 160911, 160968, 161091, 161218, 161368, 161974, 162215, 162290, 163043, 163692, 166930, 167074, 167090, 167106, 167219, 167540, 167657, 167917, 168099, 169320, 169814, 170367, 172485, 172491, 173123, 177663, 178091, 178616, 179448, 179858, 180346, 186030, 187020, 187561, 188182",,60,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: dtensor bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #108744: has linked PR; labels: good first issue, triaged, module: dtensor; title: switch more test cases to use MultithreadTestCase | issue #188182: has linked PR; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, actionable, module: dtensor, oncall: distributed parallelisms; title: torch.fft has no sharding strategy | issue #170367: has linked PR; labels: module: performance, oncall: distributed, triaged, enhancement,...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",32e69fe0262fa00ab1ca7267bf4e1305c315ae319c1650b5154b958d12a11a68
+BUNDLE-970,bundle:bundle-970,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: dtensor (3 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #156217: [Tracker] AutoParallel's feature request to DTensor,module: dtensor,Create one module: dtensor fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: dtensor paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"154266, 156217, 157495",,3,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: dtensor bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"ops only included that for a certain target shardings. To achieve this, we require OpSpec always include tensor_meta for input and output. #157495 OpStrategy should return all valid OpSpec's. OpStrategy should never raise error when finding unsupported input strategy in OpStra... | issue #154266: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, oncall: distributed, triaged, oncall: pt2, module: dtensor; title: torc...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",08f4809ee510d402e6a4614c94fed5c29982aa78f1ba3c8502b0f5b7b87fac8b
+BUNDLE-971,bundle:bundle-971,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: dynamic shapes (23 issues),issue_group,,module: dynamic shapes has linked PR,module: dynamic shapes,Create one module: dynamic shapes fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: dynamic shapes paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"90900, 112044, 118521, 121818, 125604, 133655, 137093, 137560, 140463, 143494, 151997, 152944, 165506, 168279, 175057, 180595, 180596, 181108, 181525, 181653, 187547, 188151, 188871",,23,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: dynamic shapes bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #187547: has linked PR; labels: triaged, enhancement, oncall: pt2, module: dynamic shapes, module: dynamo, bot-triaged; title: Dynamo graph-breaks on raw unbacked SymInt BlockMask lengths in FlexAttention | issue #112044: has linked PR; labels: module: rnn, triaged, module: fx, oncall: pt2, module: dynamic shapes; title: DDE in pack_padded_sequence/pad_packed_sequence decomposition. | issue #133655: has link...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f08906ad2ba318c18fe57a49564ea61b71792c9a4525f1155aea2ff084d20286
+BUNDLE-972,bundle:bundle-972,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: dynamic shapes (1 issue),issue_group,,"#93419 torchdynamo is not properly setting up input tracking (e.g., for symbolic shape guards) for view bases",module: dynamic shapes,Create one module: dynamic shapes fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: dynamic shapes paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,93419,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: dynamic shapes bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #93419: needs design decision; labels: low priority, triaged, needs design, oncall: pt2, module: dynamic shapes; title: torchdynamo is not properly setting up input tracking (e.g., for symbolic shape guards) for view bases",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9f079ae9b0459e9f6c0a7fc336cb40e0cfc677345b48a6d279e4295b5b34a883
+BUNDLE-973,bundle:bundle-973,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: dynamo (48 issues),issue_group,,module: dynamo has linked PR,module: dynamo,Create one module: dynamo fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: dynamo paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"99873, 107631, 112344, 113643, 117584, 118211, 123252, 128121, 134950, 135011, 135816, 136149, 136495, 137749, 141452, 144805, 146129, 147212, 149989, 155632, 158519, 160757, 161765, 165385, 168307, 170224, 170361, 170556, 170558, 173255, 173452, 175269, 175869, 176692, 178511, 179643, 180839, 182684, 182706, 185886, 186864, 186865, 187073, 187593, 188077, 188234, 188536, 188796",,48,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: dynamo bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #185886: has linked PR; labels: high priority, module: performance, triaged, module: regression, oncall: pt2, module: dynamo, module: guards, bot-triaged; title: [torch.compile] Clarification/regression: Dynamo cache lookup guard eval is much slower in 2.12 vs 2.7 after `inline_inbuilt_nn_modules` became always True | issue #188536: has linked PR; labels: triaged, oncall: pt2, module: dynamo; title: Graph-br...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",461f46c5d337e725c95de6845e0312466ce99b5e7766b9803456ce14efe2c445
+BUNDLE-974,bundle:bundle-974,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: dynamo (5 issues),issue_group,,module: dynamo needs reproduction,module: dynamo,Create one module: dynamo fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: dynamo paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"105700, 116766, 129658, 129668, 150912",,5,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: dynamo bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #105700: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, triaged, enhancement, oncall: pt2, module: dynamo; title: Don't use weak ref finalization for freeing resources when code objects die | issue #150912: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, triaged, oncall: pt2, module: dynamo; title: using torch.compile with torchao at the same time cause stack overflow error | issue #116766: needs reproducti...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",19579875e352d4af106c4e06979abbf3f918160f2abec44d8ba4ba5aaf9cba7d
+BUNDLE-975,bundle:bundle-975,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: edge cases (23 issues),issue_group,,module: edge cases has linked PR,module: edge cases,Create one module: edge cases fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: edge cases paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"87131, 87172, 87556, 89431, 106665, 138464, 154262, 171249, 171676, 173525, 173885, 174668, 174984, 176384, 176385, 176412, 176415, 182560, 184030, 186901, 187294, 187299, 188382",,23,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: edge cases bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #187299: has linked PR; labels: module: nn, module: error checking, triaged, enhancement, module: edge cases, topic: fuzzer, bot-triaged; title: torch.nn.functional.unfold — RuntimeError instead of ValueError for zero stride | issue #187294: has linked PR; labels: triaged, module: NaNs and Infs, module: special, module: edge cases, bot-triaged; title: torch.special.zeta returns NaN for q=+Inf instead of 0 |...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ab6e09de5fe4de9f250986f438433a17ae1624eb1557992b7be1f1031d328a80
+BUNDLE-976,bundle:bundle-976,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: elastic (7 issues),issue_group,,module: elastic needs maintainer decision,module: elastic,Create one module: elastic fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: elastic paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"75087, 76287, 80824, 121486, 124058, 143823, 160130",,7,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: elastic bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #143823: needs maintainer decision; labels: oncall: distributed, module: tests, triaged, module: elastic, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed infra, ptd-bot-triaged; title: Possible race condition found in TailLogTest.test_tail | issue #124058: needs maintainer decision; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: elastic, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed infra, ptd-bot-triaged; title: [RFC] Support Torchrun...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a729a68eac16c5d41b95ec8150203082c2c3d008cc12bfd9213db0298e3a679e
+BUNDLE-977,bundle:bundle-977,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: embedding (1 issue),issue_group,,#99268 Embedding layer tensor shape,module: embedding,Create one module: embedding fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: embedding paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,99268,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: embedding bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #99268: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, triaged, module: embedding; title: Embedding layer tensor shape",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7509cd13a7213b0356e608f887a1b76738b90032b000bb7604daffdddc56c87c
+BUNDLE-978,bundle:bundle-978,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: empty tensor (1 issue),issue_group,,#169208 Segmentation fault in torch.native_batch_norm with empty running_var tensor,module: empty tensor,Create one module: empty tensor fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: empty tensor paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,169208,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: empty tensor bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #169208: has linked PR; labels: module: error checking, triaged, actionable, module: norms and normalization, module: empty tensor; title: Segmentation fault in torch.native_batch_norm with empty running_var tensor",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1471bfa97dfd5e67e34e7f2208fc33333e55edef1b9c8993254ae3b9a9b10e49
+BUNDLE-979,bundle:bundle-979,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: error checking (19 issues),issue_group,,module: error checking has linked PR,module: error checking,Create one module: error checking fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: error checking paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"111158, 126673, 134841, 137468, 152178, 153378, 160553, 163504, 167414, 169236, 174602, 175368, 176244, 181576, 184280, 185006, 185481, 188087, 188360",,19,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: error checking bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #185481: has linked PR; labels: module: error checking, triaged, oncall: pt2, module: inductor; title: [inductor] argmax over comparison mask is accepted and used for indexing while eager raises | issue #185006: has linked PR; labels: module: optimizer, module: error checking, triaged, module: LrScheduler, bot-triaged; title: ConstantLR accepts factor=0 and crashes with ZeroDivisionError after total_iters st...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",453cbe005277b6ad5d8322e98635431c467bcd8de9f3d8a0f28fa9bb3d12acfe
+BUNDLE-980,bundle:bundle-980,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: faketensor (17 issues),issue_group,,#115516 [FakeTensor] FakeTensorMode dispatch won't change generator state,module: faketensor,Create one module: faketensor fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: faketensor paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"82616, 84925, 91655, 100985, 102187, 104194, 106732, 107582, 113589, 115516, 119407, 119589, 120105, 122806, 141545, 159150, 185684",,17,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: faketensor bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #115516: needs design decision; labels: triaged, module: random, needs design, oncall: pt2, module: fakeTensor, module: pt2-dispatcher; title: [FakeTensor] FakeTensorMode dispatch won't change generator state | issue #141545: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, triaged, oncall: pt2, module: fakeTensor, module: pt2-dispatcher; title: Missing Fake/Meta/Abstract Kernels for Operators | issue #185684...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",45bb03eec423611fe72744d3a8049705824ef16be785509d7857eb42611441af
+BUNDLE-981,bundle:bundle-981,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: fft (2 issues),issue_group,,module: fft needs maintainer decision,module: fft,Create one module: fft fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: fft paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"171022, 188496",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: fft bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #188496: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: onnx, triaged, has workaround, module: fft, bot-triaged; title: torch.fft.irfft2 ONNX export produces graph that onnxruntime cannot execute. | issue #171022: needs maintainer decision; labels: triaged, module: fft; title: In-place real-domain FFT operators for memory-efficient training (bf16 support)",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f8e7e6b4b3f1803ceddf97a84016e8b42065cdbfa7d56c6a3afbbe8dca823426
+BUNDLE-982,bundle:bundle-982,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: first class dims (1 issue),issue_group,,#133559 Support for variable number of dimensions in functorch.dim dims() and autonaming induced inconsistencies,module: first class dims,Create one module: first class dims fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: first class dims paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,133559,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: first class dims bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #133559: needs maintainer decision; labels: triaged, module: functorch, module: first class dims; title: Support for variable number of dimensions in functorch.dim dims() and autonaming induced inconsistencies",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f7d23b6084b753c705d3d67868486361b42c860b526e07d3384c22e16aee7922
+BUNDLE-983,bundle:bundle-983,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: flaky-tests (70 issues),issue_group,,module: flaky-tests needs maintainer decision batch 6,module: flaky-tests,Create one module: flaky-tests fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: flaky-tests paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"100074, 124152, 145189, 145344, 149080, 153236, 158443, 159151, 176966, 179811, 179853, 179874, 179897, 179990, 180204, 180322, 180324, 180337, 180366, 180414, 180437, 180439, 180490, 180542, 181224, 181318, 181322, 181629, 182174, 182259, 182260, 185452, 186868, 186871, 186872, 186873, 186909, 186910, 186911, 186912, 186999, 187000, 187046, 187156, 187176, 187202, 187203, 187290, 187378, 187424, 187425, 187645, 187658, 187718, 187738, 188041, 188123, 188144, 188627, 188628, 188668, 188767, 188895, 188897, 188899, 188983, 188985, 189015, 189066, 189067",,70,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: flaky-tests bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #186912: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: rocm, triaged, module: flaky-tests, skipped, oncall: distributed checkpointing; title: DISABLED test_checkpoint_write_future_state_dict (__main__.TestCheckpointProcess) | issue #186911: needs maintainer decision; labels: triaged, module: flaky-tests, skipped, oncall: r2p; title: DISABLED test_launch_elastic_multiple_agents (__main__.ElasticLaunchTest) | iss...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",48679d70f17f6deb7fb2436bd9929b62711582a89320119818a33672ba5f2d45
+BUNDLE-984,bundle:bundle-984,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: flaky-tests (18 issues),issue_group,,module: flaky-tests needs maintainer decision batch 1,module: flaky-tests,Create one module: flaky-tests fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: flaky-tests paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"62902, 150877, 152632, 167272, 167297, 179742, 179799, 179879, 180194, 180195, 180213, 187289, 188798, 189151, 189221, 189223, 189244, 189255",,18,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: flaky-tests bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #189255: needs maintainer decision; labels: oncall: distributed, module: rocm, triaged, module: flaky-tests, skipped; title: DISABLED test_delayed_optim_step_offload_true_no_shard_cuda (__main__.TestParityWithDDPCUDA) | issue #189244: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: rocm, triaged, module: flaky-tests, skipped, oncall: pt2, module: inductor; title: DISABLED test_cat_pointwise (__main__.NumBytesMetr...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1e553fc2471bfea296d207eb3bdfeff1aaffad20b88c192007091aa473828c3e
+BUNDLE-985,bundle:bundle-985,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: flex attention (13 issues),issue_group,,module: flex attention has linked PR,module: flex attention,Create one module: flex attention fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: flex attention paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"133254, 137574, 141627, 141784, 145208, 145782, 150321, 153221, 159770, 170839, 173071, 176837, 188212",,13,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: flex attention bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #145208: has linked PR; labels: triaged, oncall: pt2, module: higher order operators, module: pt2-dispatcher, module: flex attention; title: Some FlexAttention learned bias bugs/limitations | issue #133254: has linked PR; labels: triaged, oncall: pt2, module: inductor, module: flex attention, repro:agent:h100:repro_fail:not_reproduced; title: Shared memory out of resource when using flex attention | issue #1...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1e0e80099c3870c0527b158ab903003fb7fddb0449ec48d8c4c76719697f1648
+BUNDLE-986,bundle:bundle-986,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: floatx (formerly float8) (15 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 8 issues - issue #146326: Tracking issue for Improvements for DeepSeek,module: floatx (formerly float8),Create one module: floatx (formerly float8) fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: floatx (formerly float8) paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"130015, 146326, 146328, 146329, 146330, 146331, 146332, 146368, 146542, 148420, 153809, 156771, 174417, 187807, 188676",,15,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: floatx (formerly float8) bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"@eqy let's take this discussion to #146328, the API you linked is for fp32/fp64 only, and has sizes/pointers on the CPU, not GPU. | sign options here. #146332 More flexibility for mixed precision optimizers (e.g. DeepSeek mentions that they keep optimizer states in bf16) #146542 cc @awgu @wanchaol @fegin @fduwjj @wz337 @wconstab @d4l3k @pragupta @msaroufim @dcci @aditvenk @weifengpy @drisspg @liangel-02 @h... | or...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6beec48a13eccfea655c73056f5a014e0efe2cb519b543fdae10d28e8afe703f
+BUNDLE-987,bundle:bundle-987,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: fsdp (23 issues),issue_group,,#120383 Numeric stability issue with full parameter fine tuning of Llama 2 7B model with FSDP,module: fsdp,Create one module: fsdp fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: fsdp paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"102402, 108381, 120383, 124260, 136408, 136950, 141237, 154657, 156784, 156966, 157027, 157832, 160068, 160169, 160272, 160340, 161153, 162160, 162257, 165933, 167036, 168143, 178749",,23,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: fsdp bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #120383: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, oncall: distributed, triaged, module: fsdp, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed parallelisms, ptd-bot-triaged; title: Numeric stability issue with full parameter fine tuning of Llama 2 7B model with FSDP | issue #162257: needs maintainer decision; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: fsdp, oncall: distributed checkpointing, bot-triaged, ptd-bot-t...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c34e15d9b9aafd59d439e5adb287aa81d1405aa27b61e94b95fc550e25d447cc
+BUNDLE-988,bundle:bundle-988,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: functionalization (7 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #138220: Update auto_functionalized_v2 to pass view subgraphs,module: functionalization,Create one module: functionalization fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: functionalization paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"133512, 138220, 138221, 140835, 152323, 171375, 177372",,7,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: functionalization bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"lacing. The main thing to do to get auto_functionalized_v2 to work with export is to develop a BC serialization scheme for it. We should do #138220 as a part of that work so that we don't need to break BC in the future when we implement that. cc @ezyang @chauhang @penguinwu @a... | issue #133512: has linked PR; labels: triaged, module: functionalization, oncall: pt2, module: pt2-dispatcher; title: functionalizatio...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3b5853f5259939179b85f62d246c4421bfebcf0eb4e6326dea5e1b6c7bc5702b
+BUNDLE-989,bundle:bundle-989,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: functorch (12 issues),issue_group,,module: functorch has linked PR,module: functorch,Create one module: functorch fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: functorch paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"86641, 91942, 97248, 99573, 130451, 138422, 151782, 154284, 171604, 175521, 175522, 175850",,12,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: functorch bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #175521: has linked PR; labels: feature, triaged, module: vmap, module: pytree, module: functorch, bot-triaged; title: torch.vmap working with non-tensor leaves in output pytrees | issue #175522: has linked PR; labels: feature, triaged, module: vmap, oncall: pt2, module: functorch, module: higher order operators, module: pt2-dispatcher, bot-triaged; title: while_loop vmap compatibility | issue #154284: has l...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",79aec20c64923881f22efb531a7c7b9bbae2abcab8d6d9dbfbe6e9f3a78f0e55
+BUNDLE-990,bundle:bundle-990,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: fx (5 issues),issue_group,,module: fx has linked PR,module: fx,Create one module: fx fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: fx paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"135196, 171981, 185640, 187649, 188538",,5,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: fx bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #188538: has linked PR; labels: triaged, module: fx, oncall: pt2, bot-triaged, bot-mislabeled; title: torch.fx _format_target emits invalid or semantically incorrect Python for valid module names | issue #185640: has linked PR; labels: triaged, module: fx, oncall: pt2, module: ProxyTensor, module: pt2-dispatcher, bot-triaged; title: `make_fx` generates broken input codegen for a function with a `(tuple, dict...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4e69202a172f7394c7573642d14b639cc5cc7e8bb4f2df6d89b9c86c8cd9e58b
+BUNDLE-991,bundle:bundle-991,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: fx.passes (1 issue),issue_group,,#188669 fx_graph_cse skipping duplicate element-wise CUDA optimization.,module: fx.passes,Create one module: fx.passes fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: fx.passes paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,188669,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: fx.passes bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #188669: needs maintainer decision; labels: triaged, oncall: pt2, module: fx.passes, bot-triaged; title: fx_graph_cse skipping duplicate element-wise CUDA optimization.",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d45b8cfb97ea16e952d2bc9e0724cd902ed4a92a25b464e844f9053d952c87dc
+BUNDLE-992,bundle:bundle-992,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: guards (1 issue),issue_group,,"#139789 compiling ""input mutation"" followed by ""input mutation + aliasing"" does not properly recompile",module: guards,Create one module: guards fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: guards paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,139789,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: guards bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #139789: has linked PR; labels: high priority, triaged, oncall: pt2, module: guards; title: compiling ""input mutation"" followed by ""input mutation + aliasing"" does not properly recompile",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ac401b283722e148bdf6092b244301370501897f58b1642aeea6d60cdb1bcce5
+BUNDLE-993,bundle:bundle-993,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: half (2 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #182817: [MPS] Switch test_output_match / test_output_grad_match to magnitude-floored relative tolerance,module: half,Create one module: half fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: half paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"182817, 183621",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: half bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,🐛 Describe the bug Context Related to the discussion at issue #182817 this is an orthogonal issue with the current testing approach and a suggestion on how we could address it: When testing op correctness for,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8b86baabe9ab8197dcf33db43f50e458f3c4eab4fd9d496a06d1a49bbd387e4b
+BUNDLE-994,bundle:bundle-994,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: higher order operators (14 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #146941: Make HOPs more debuggable,module: higher order operators,Create one module: higher order operators fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: higher order operators paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"120189, 122588, 133721, 141259, 144803, 145451, 146860, 146861, 146941, 147115, 147210, 150062, 158975, 169672",,14,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: higher order operators bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"another example: #147115 | issue #145451: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, triaged, oncall: pt2, module: higher order operators, module: pt2-dispatcher; title: [Dynamo]while_loop raise an exception | issue #144803: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, triaged, oncall: pt2, module: higher order operators, module: pt2-dispatcher; title: Something is fishy with discard_graph_changes | issue...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",223f0b2b291e7c4aa4fce6c15695b098eaf3dc866938c3429154106fbead1358
+BUNDLE-995,bundle:bundle-995,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: inductor (49 issues),issue_group,,module: inductor has linked PR batch 1,module: inductor,Create one module: inductor fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: inductor paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"105560, 106006, 111182, 121122, 121135, 130039, 132865, 133462, 138980, 139077, 141595, 145401, 146306, 147075, 150296, 159413, 161609, 161842, 163932, 165280, 165501, 165785, 170562, 173793, 174066, 174792, 175538, 176507, 179272, 179520, 180168, 180823, 180957, 181006, 181076, 182430, 182928, 183899, 184394, 184903, 185533, 185885, 187241, 188213, 188217, 188225, 188226, 188578, 188635",,49,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: inductor bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #188578: has linked PR; labels: module: performance, triaged, enhancement, module: regression, oncall: pt2, module: inductor, bot-triaged; title: [Inductor] Optimize split reduction heuristics on GB200 | issue #188635: has linked PR; labels: module: performance, triaged, enhancement, oncall: pt2, module: inductor, bot-triaged; title: torch.compile misses fusion for producer -> view/transpose/contiguous layou...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d949bd84a8cff666db39d2aa339c79faa766f3a89e1384ffd9ce18f529f1b030
+BUNDLE-996,bundle:bundle-996,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: inductor (21 issues),issue_group,,module: inductor needs maintainer decision batch 1,module: inductor,Create one module: inductor fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: inductor paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"122840, 125254, 146780, 148402, 156818, 165398, 168573, 168995, 174313, 180948, 180974, 182868, 185534, 187019, 188238, 188239, 188392, 188393, 188687, 188740, 188840",,21,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: inductor bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #180948: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: tests, triaged, skipped, oncall: pt2, module: inductor, module: xpu, bot-triaged; title: DISABLED test_emulate_precision_casts_preserves_explicit_precision_cast_float16 (__main__.CudaReproTests) | issue #168995: needs maintainer decision; labels: triaged, oncall: pt2, module: inductor; title: MXFP8 + torch.compile error: NotImplementedError: make_reindexer...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e29cd6818858eef81ae5bdfa9c75b7a7e2dd4643ebe0ca1b86cb8c1cb9fbac8f
+BUNDLE-997,bundle:bundle-997,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: infra (4 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 3 issues - issue #160322: `torch.Tensor` methods return type annotation too broad for `torch.Tensor` subclasses,module: infra,Create one module: infra fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: infra paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"63038, 160322, 161713, 163990",,4,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: infra bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"🚀 The feature, motivation and pitch This is a subtask of #161713 In order to understand the impact of changes made to type signatures and help improve type coverage from downstream users of PyTorch, we sh | mprove types exported by PyTorch so people who install torch can better navigate and enable type checking in their code. This follows up on #160322 to help define how we'll track external type coverage improvem...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c7aa35e39ce5240d9fe020fc623320ab0001b67d2f336a713f129e15f68663bd
+BUNDLE-998,bundle:bundle-998,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: initialization (1 issue),issue_group,,#180968 Initializing weights after parametrization silently fails,module: initialization,Create one module: initialization fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: initialization paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,180968,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: initialization bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #180968: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: nn, triaged, module: initialization, has workaround, module: nn.utils.parametrize, bot-triaged; title: Initializing weights after parametrization silently fails",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",60d6b6d56701c9656a601aaa628a8d1c8a63a9239c64ba6f61c28000638c389f
+BUNDLE-999,bundle:bundle-999,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: intel (3 issues),issue_group,,#125954 Error: command buffer exited with error status.,module: intel,Create one module: intel fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: intel paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"125954, 132368, 169670",,3,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: intel bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #125954: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, triaged, module: macos, module: intel, module: mps; title: Error: command buffer exited with error status. | issue #169670: needs maintainer decision; labels: triaged, module: mkl, module: linear algebra, module: intel; title: Energy normalization error on torch.fft.fft2 and torch.fft.ifft2 when the matrix size = [2048, 2048] | issue #132368: has linke...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",72d89eb4e8af1df032efa9f05d02f1aa073016002b39e2cc90aaed81e9900963
+BUNDLE-1000,bundle:bundle-1000,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: internals (6 issues),issue_group,,#129020 Expand Tag Set: views & reductions,module: internals,Create one module: internals fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: internals paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"30955, 129020, 129992, 146414, 146647, 146980",,6,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: internals bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #129020: has linked PR; labels: module: internals, good first issue, triaged; title: Expand Tag Set: views & reductions | e in core rather than extension that implements this one via TensorSubclassing. If it must be part of PyTorch, will it be a shell type (see #146414 that outlines what shell types are) or a fully functional one. If later, then it would be nice to better. understand what hardwar... | Contex...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",fcd17fe2b700ca52d396892e55eda9313b0d035d82a637c14cf063fd8a63a0c8
+BUNDLE-1001,bundle:bundle-1001,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: jiterator (2 issues),issue_group,,#132756 JITerator: Torch.prod produces RuntimeError: CUDA driver error: invalid argument,module: jiterator,Create one module: jiterator fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: jiterator paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"74415, 132756",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: jiterator bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #132756: has linked PR; labels: needs reproduction, triaged, module: jiterator, oncall: pt2; title: JITerator: Torch.prod produces RuntimeError: CUDA driver error: invalid argument | issue #74415: needs maintainer decision; labels: triaged, module: jiterator; title: Warning: ""Specified kernel cache directory could not be created""",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ed14c2e2656a6152ce6101ce50d319661fdf0ea5951c21cf88fda82178d92657
+BUNDLE-1002,bundle:bundle-1002,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: library (1 issue),issue_group,,"#146804 `torch.library.register_fake` respects only positional order, but not kwargs order",module: library,Create one module: library fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: library paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,146804,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: library bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #146804: needs design decision; labels: triaged, needs design, module: library, oncall: pt2, module: pt2-dispatcher; title: `torch.library.register_fake` respects only positional order, but not kwargs order",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9a030851d597c7c44b91f91101ec8312093c1d564d34c64b588110cfab80cc71
+BUNDLE-1003,bundle:bundle-1003,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: linear algebra (23 issues),issue_group,,module: linear algebra has linked PR,module: linear algebra,Create one module: linear algebra fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: linear algebra paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"9983, 44591, 49890, 50204, 69203, 70008, 73143, 75225, 76528, 88948, 101249, 118225, 128564, 128778, 140282, 151761, 157360, 176413, 185650, 186148, 187567, 188135, 188391",,23,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: linear algebra bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #187567: has linked PR; labels: high priority, module: performance, triaged, module: macos, has workaround, module: linear algebra, module: mps, bot-triaged; title: [MPS] torch.linalg.qr is 25-250× slower than CPU on tall-skinny matrices | issue #186148: has linked PR; labels: module: performance, triaged, enhancement, has workaround, module: linear algebra, bot-triaged; title: `torch.matmul` misses `mm` fol...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",10dcf906dbc807a382161ab3bd9dfa4f74e8dbb785ba87f8d4bc9aa450c49244
+BUNDLE-1004,bundle:bundle-1004,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: lint (3 issues),issue_group,,#115016 Enable ruff rule PLW1510 codebase wide,module: lint,Create one module: lint fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: lint paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"115016, 149639, 158906",,3,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: lint bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #115016: has linked PR; labels: good first issue, module: lint, triaged; title: Enable ruff rule PLW1510 codebase wide | issue #149639: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: typing, module: lint, triaged, actionable; title: Pylint error: ` torch.linalg.vector_norm is not callable` | issue #158906: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, module: lint, triaged; title: The make lint command got stuck.",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4d88581488651ad60363015c27d794aa5e3aadfe3a877f67c1c39ec7487742b8
+BUNDLE-1005,bundle:bundle-1005,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: logging (1 issue),issue_group,,#150974 feature: tlparse summary,module: logging,Create one module: logging fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: logging paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,150974,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: logging bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #150974: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: logging, triaged, oncall: pt2; title: feature: tlparse summary",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9df7becdc54c004d4f31395fe62a272a642b71f0def82dc87aba102299fede16
+BUNDLE-1006,bundle:bundle-1006,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: loss (11 issues),issue_group,,module: loss has linked PR,module: loss,Create one module: loss fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: loss paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"25174, 50712, 88325, 95374, 97788, 123339, 126642, 129643, 134767, 185647, 188216",,11,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: loss bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #123339: has linked PR; labels: module: loss, triaged; title: Inconsistency: BCELoss asserts target in [0, 1], BCEWithLogitsLoss does not | issue #185647: has linked PR; labels: module: loss, module: memory usage, triaged, actionable; title: Unexpected storage from MSE loss output | issue #126642: has linked PR; labels: module: loss, module: optimizer, triaged, actionable; title: [optim] add missing 'maximiz...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d85b7580108081db50537e4b30a676059fe482b7c77db5dcfd1f069061256c3e
+BUNDLE-1007,bundle:bundle-1007,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: lrscheduler (3 issues),issue_group,,#184517 LRScheduler doesn't use _get_closed_form_lr when initalizing scheduler,module: lrscheduler,Create one module: lrscheduler fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: lrscheduler paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"66781, 71272, 184517",,3,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: lrscheduler bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #184517: needs design decision; labels: triaged, needs research, module: LrScheduler, bot-triaged, bot-mislabeled; title: LRScheduler doesn't use _get_closed_form_lr when initalizing scheduler | issue #71272: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, module: optimizer, triaged, module: LrScheduler; title: UserWarning: Seems like `optimizer.step()` has been overridden after learning rate scheduler initi...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7583f1c9ed688e4f47b53d41acec34bee4627a898369e0e99683fe151bc3752c
+BUNDLE-1008,bundle:bundle-1008,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: memory format (2 issues),issue_group,,#184642 `Module.to()` has no overload for `.to(memory_format=torch.channels_last)`,module: memory format,Create one module: memory format fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: memory format paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"184642, 187963",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: memory format bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #184642: has linked PR; labels: module: nn, module: typing, triaged, enhancement, module: memory format, bot-triaged; title: `Module.to()` has no overload for `.to(memory_format=torch.channels_last)` | issue #187963: needs maintainer decision; labels: triaged, module: memory format, module: pooling, oncall: pt2, module: pallas, bot-triaged; title: Pallas CPU max_unpool2d does not preserve channels-last outpu...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",55917a72840f630a4523129b44856e0d126c391f03f0987f96640efd91c9b5f3
+BUNDLE-1009,bundle:bundle-1009,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: memory usage (15 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 4 issues - issue #145374: Memory Leak in MPS Backend During LSTM Iterations (Out of Memory Error),module: memory usage,Create one module: memory usage fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: memory usage paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"28943, 40133, 43450, 52036, 105839, 120167, 126388, 137393, 139709, 145374, 154329, 154363, 155060, 164299, 167906",,15,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: memory usage bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"🐛 Describe the bug 🐛 Describe the bug The MPS backend leaks memory. This has been a long-standing issue as mentioned in Issue #155060, Issue #154329, and issue #145374. I've observed it on my machines for the past 2 years and decided to do some RCA work over the past week. | is a few seconds into the script: On CPU, I don't get any memory pressure at all. I initially documented these observations as comments to #1...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",84ebfcb8a549fbf4744fd6f32653d44d31002400af8f1b6a8e006207c7a137a8
+BUNDLE-1010,bundle:bundle-1010,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: memory usage (2 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #114455: Torch Cpu Memory Leak with FastApi uvicorn.,module: memory usage,Create one module: memory usage fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: memory usage paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"68114, 114455",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: memory usage bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"contains torch.no_grad() , gc, and del model. But still during embeddings generation 250-300 mb memory getting stuck in ram. Similar issue: #68114 Is there any way to release cpu memory after every api call ? Versions 2.1.0+cu121'",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3eee8ba6164206abc0f2ef8c7bc9e2018390c1c1b9694230129ed656ea87969d
+BUNDLE-1011,bundle:bundle-1011,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: meta tensors (2 issues),issue_group,,"#96409 Initialization on `meta` device failing for models containing `nn.utils.weight_norm`, with `NotImplementedError: Could not run 'aten::_weight_norm_interface' with arguments from the 'Meta' backend.`",module: meta tensors,Create one module: meta tensors fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: meta tensors paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"96409, 188692",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: meta tensors bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #96409: has linked PR; labels: triaged, actionable, module: meta tensors; title: Initialization on `meta` device failing for models containing `nn.utils.weight_norm`, with `NotImplementedError: Could not run 'aten::_weight_norm_interface' with arguments from the 'Meta' backend.` | issue #188692: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: rnn, module: tests, triaged, module: mkldnn, skipped, module: meta tens...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b236f057e0f4ac127d26545419cdc0a7ee51cfea75b367399088e302df6e8936
+BUNDLE-1012,bundle:bundle-1012,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: molly-guard (1 issue),issue_group,,#182105 Adding a UserWarning when pickling / deepcopying tensor views,module: molly-guard,Create one module: molly-guard fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: molly-guard paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,182105,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: molly-guard bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #182105: needs maintainer decision; labels: feature, module: molly-guard, module: pickle, module: serialization, triaged, module: ux, bot-triaged; title: Adding a UserWarning when pickling / deepcopying tensor views",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",351a848beaea2c4f71eda278b759f2e7ed2ce13645ac23c1ff6a1f7f76efeab2
+BUNDLE-1013,bundle:bundle-1013,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: mpi (1 issue),issue_group,,#142095 torch.distributed.new_group got stuck when use backend=mpi,module: mpi,Create one module: mpi fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: mpi paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,142095,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: mpi bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #142095: needs maintainer decision; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: mpi, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed infra, ptd-bot-triaged; title: torch.distributed.new_group got stuck when use backend=mpi",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c016cb133c3aff95de7d330ae7fc33d1c992c23021c56817e71d4eea89ea6584
+BUNDLE-1014,bundle:bundle-1014,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: mps (21 issues),issue_group,,module: mps has linked PR,module: mps,Create one module: mps fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: mps paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"96602, 99037, 111547, 117210, 123148, 132226, 136003, 140706, 146769, 150121, 160732, 160739, 175873, 176730, 177225, 179259, 179294, 181650, 187827, 188198, 188728",,21,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: mps bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #188198: has linked PR; labels: module: performance, triaged, module: regression, module: mps, bot-triaged; title: [MPS] cat op dropped performance in torch==2.10 release | issue #181650: has linked PR; labels: needs reproduction, triaged, module: mps, bot-triaged; title: MPS: `add_dense_scalar_cast_float` shader fails with ""Read-only bytes bound to shader argument with write access enabled"" assertion during...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9a3e905f525420b890a5e10c4f6a0c815bbc637f45668a0dd0235aa3deb9d313
+BUNDLE-1015,bundle:bundle-1015,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: mta (2 issues),issue_group,,module: mta needs maintainer decision,module: mta,Create one module: mta fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: mta paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"133367, 172273",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: mta bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #133367: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: performance, module: optimizer, triaged, actionable, module: mta; title: Adafactor foreach impl performance tracker | issue #172273: needs maintainer decision; labels: triaged, module: mta; title: Numeric difference between div and foreach_div",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",94b0d405f6a0a393ee66146ee013d3d72123247b8831988ab76701655a77dfb4
+BUNDLE-1016,bundle:bundle-1016,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: multi-gpu (1 issue),issue_group,,#59626 multi scripted model on the same gpu on multi gpu machine,module: multi-gpu,Create one module: multi-gpu fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: multi-gpu paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,59626,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: multi-gpu bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #59626: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, module: multi-gpu, triaged; title: multi scripted model on the same gpu on multi gpu machine",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",db341166f2ed2500594f510023f13a1827ce48ed3bad5974745dbc38da1b95de
+BUNDLE-1017,bundle:bundle-1017,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: multiprocessing (9 issues),issue_group,,#171796 Exception in subprocess causes infinite hang and zombie processes,module: multiprocessing,Create one module: multiprocessing fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: multiprocessing paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"2482, 48579, 50261, 110594, 113840, 119546, 124902, 150921, 171796",,9,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: multiprocessing bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #171796: needs maintainer decision; labels: oncall: distributed, module: multiprocessing, triaged; title: Exception in subprocess causes infinite hang and zombie processes | issue #124902: needs design decision; labels: module: multiprocessing, feature, triaged, needs design, module: PrivateUse1; title: Add support for IPC features for PrivateUse devices | issue #119546: needs reproduction; labels: needs rep...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b09fd97c4846f1f48dd7ff0c3197e7c8e43d44022eea80f95a605d7a266e9ff2
+BUNDLE-1018,bundle:bundle-1018,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: nans and infs (7 issues),issue_group,,module: nans and infs needs maintainer decision,module: nans and infs,Create one module: nans and infs fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: nans and infs paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"63322, 80588, 98204, 126760, 163997, 173796, 182156",,7,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: nans and infs bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #182156: needs maintainer decision; labels: feature, module: nn, triaged, module: NaNs and Infs, bot-triaged; title: Add torch.utils.nan_guard for forward-pass NaN/Inf debugging | issue #163997: needs maintainer decision; labels: triaged, module: NaNs and Infs, module: sdpa; title: `F.scaled_dot_product_attention` returns all-`NaN` rows during evaluation but not training | issue #173796: needs maintainer dec...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b453c3819a5dd12f90004c4af4a6045cadd5f8a122281140eb5596e132787c8f
+BUNDLE-1019,bundle:bundle-1019,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: nccl (7 issues),issue_group,,module: nccl needs maintainer decision,module: nccl,Create one module: nccl fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: nccl paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"75334, 107174, 114884, 119196, 129862, 136390, 139581",,7,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: nccl bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #136390: needs maintainer decision; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: nccl, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed infra, ptd-bot-triaged; title: [c10d][nccl][cuda] Regression (unspecific cuda launch error) with test_c10d_nncl | issue #129862: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: performance, oncall: distributed, triaged, enhancement, module: nccl, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed infra, ptd-bot-...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ae8d70c6b69a3b76f8c932cc09c8a311efb87641b7bb7f52017fddb54948a599
+BUNDLE-1020,bundle:bundle-1020,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: nestedtensor (2 issues),issue_group,,module: nestedtensor needs maintainer decision,module: nestedtensor,Create one module: nestedtensor fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: nestedtensor paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"172623, 187582",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: nestedtensor bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #187582: needs maintainer decision; labels: triaged, module: nestedtensor, bot-triaged; title: torch.nested NJTs with identical layout fail on binary operation | issue #172623: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: typing, triaged, module: nestedtensor; title: Nested Tensors should have their own type",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6de1d56bd67360751f4d263aa1b99d840e9a682315f4a102b260dd6499731b9b
+BUNDLE-1021,bundle:bundle-1021,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: nn (47 issues),issue_group,,module: nn has linked PR,module: nn,Create one module: nn fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: nn paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"38035, 44945, 73009, 74746, 80168, 80821, 104860, 105632, 109652, 109691, 109706, 110865, 112827, 113708, 122680, 128712, 133168, 140458, 141288, 141827, 142320, 146938, 148843, 153035, 154906, 155368, 155878, 157345, 158043, 166166, 166826, 172338, 173160, 174045, 175032, 175372, 175862, 176381, 176628, 177537, 178072, 181663, 184037, 185022, 185023, 188166, 189236",,47,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: nn bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #188166: has linked PR; labels: module: nn, triaged, bot-triaged; title: load_state_dict(assign=True) mutates the caller's state_dict._metadata | issue #73009: has linked PR; labels: module: nn, triaged, actionable; title: Improve loading for nn.modules.lazy.LazyModuleMixin | issue #185023: has linked PR; labels: module: nn, module: typing, triaged, bot-triaged; title: register_buffer-created attributes and...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e44d73c6cfcca8ea49358869473f36e91bca6e54dd32679f0e71b3a74fb27784
+BUNDLE-1022,bundle:bundle-1022,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: nn (51 issues),issue_group,,module: nn needs design decision batch 3,module: nn,Create one module: nn fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: nn paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"8837, 14844, 35458, 37155, 43101, 48494, 50566, 52207, 64804, 67087, 68514, 68516, 69757, 73172, 76024, 80302, 80380, 83492, 83800, 84751, 89724, 91073, 98089, 102201, 102447, 102905, 104857, 105365, 108676, 108692, 109453, 109582, 110885, 111538, 114462, 115585, 115588, 117217, 120072, 120700, 122551, 126762, 127932, 130480, 133466, 134325, 138952, 139977, 142302, 143852, 165590",,51,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: nn bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #102447: needs design decision; labels: module: nn, triaged, enhancement, needs research; title: Add additional ""sigmoid"" approximation to GeLu activation? | issue #117217: needs design decision; labels: module: nn, triaged, needs research; title: BatchNorm1d, running_mean and running_var | issue #115588: needs design decision; labels: module: nn, triaged, needs research; title: `torch.nn.KLDivLoss` fails `t...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b76e6be1a025a72c4fc99bc0b5de282212717cf1bf82f8d7b57da1835ac6c3bd
+BUNDLE-1023,bundle:bundle-1023,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: nnpack (1 issue),issue_group,,"#143646 Getting ""Could not initialize NNPACK! Reason: Unsupported hardware."" warning even though NNPACK is enabled",module: nnpack,Create one module: nnpack fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: nnpack paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,143646,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: nnpack bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #143646: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, triaged, module: nnpack; title: Getting ""Could not initialize NNPACK! Reason: Unsupported hardware."" warning even though NNPACK is enabled",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7018188991a82924185cc02013eafec8902705dc26d2bbf153cda3660a19f6b2
+BUNDLE-1024,bundle:bundle-1024,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: norms and normalization (1 issue),issue_group,,#46516 Batchnorm support for tracking buffer statistics when using gradient accumulation,module: norms and normalization,Create one module: norms and normalization fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: norms and normalization paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,46516,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: norms and normalization bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #46516: needs design decision; labels: triaged, enhancement, needs research, module: norms and normalization; title: Batchnorm support for tracking buffer statistics when using gradient accumulation",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",bea84851964737cd1464d4b069cffe7a301f9406cfe00046f13c8012f2371305
+BUNDLE-1025,bundle:bundle-1025,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: numerical-reproducibility (1 issue),issue_group,,#107115 H100 works differently than rtx4090 on same model,module: numerical-reproducibility,Create one module: numerical-reproducibility fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: numerical-reproducibility paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,107115,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: numerical-reproducibility bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #107115: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, triaged, module: numerical-reproducibility; title: H100 works differently than rtx4090 on same model",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",bdae56375c72fcb9a45c9cf4f9e1f4cb1d8d2ae944a479cc544d6a41df38bf50
+BUNDLE-1026,bundle:bundle-1026,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: numerical-stability (8 issues),issue_group,,module: numerical-stability needs maintainer decision,module: numerical-stability,Create one module: numerical-stability fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: numerical-stability paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"5953, 39242, 56340, 72759, 108521, 126158, 132989, 139964",,8,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: numerical-stability bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #56340: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: numerical-stability, triaged; title: log_softmax(x) != x - logsumexp(x) | issue #132989: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: numerical-stability, triaged; title: Different random seeds can cause differences in arithmetic precision | issue #139964: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: numerical-stability, triaged; title: Report issue for torch.nn...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7e8496d38ecd8deec95d7bb8692dddb8c269552d2aa14531ac0b605f68ae0254
+BUNDLE-1027,bundle:bundle-1027,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: numpy (11 issues),issue_group,,module: numpy has linked PR,module: numpy,Create one module: numpy fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: numpy paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"41245, 41803, 45051, 48830, 61901, 71479, 84705, 105053, 106692, 116465, 125422",,11,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: numpy bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #116465: has linked PR; labels: triaged, module: numpy, actionable; title: torch.cartesian_prod inconsitent return shape for one input tensor | issue #41245: has linked PR; labels: triaged, module: numpy; title: torch.sign is divergent from numpy.sign on NaN | issue #105053: needs design decision; labels: feature, triaged, module: numpy, needs design, module: python frontend; title: Multiple dimensions suppo...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",996ff85cdbdc994f0ab1bdcc654bbc5c757a5983228c0d6e236dc17f53ebd53b
+BUNDLE-1028,bundle:bundle-1028,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: onnx (12 issues),issue_group,,module: onnx needs reproduction,module: onnx,Create one module: onnx fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: onnx paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"76344, 86684, 87550, 129279, 143954, 149605, 149937, 171759, 173369, 175738, 177952, 179709",,12,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: onnx bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #177952: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, module: onnx, triaged, OSS contribution wanted, bot-triaged; title: Fix onnx tests running on GPU/CUDA | issue #149937: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, module: onnx, triaged; title: torch.inverse can't export onnx opset16 | issue #87550: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, module: onnx, triaged, onnx-triaged; title: [onnx] e...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",91a6c874e0e460a744a638f66078b22adad2a5b890320aae9dc7b18785d1704b
+BUNDLE-1029,bundle:bundle-1029,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: openreg (6 issues),issue_group,,module: openreg needs maintainer decision,module: openreg,Create one module: openreg fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: openreg paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"169597, 172319, 172320, 172322, 172803, 177268",,6,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: openreg bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #177268: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: tests, triaged, enhancement, module: openreg, bot-triaged; title: [OpenReg] Add testing operator framework usage examples | issue #172320: needs maintainer decision; labels: triaged, module: openreg; title: [OpenReg] Extend device infrastructure tests (device, event, streams) | issue #172803: needs maintainer decision; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged,...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5cbdd81e8e18848923e8a9854566c0025125a22298c4c9fde51c01a20c657c78
+BUNDLE-1030,bundle:bundle-1030,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: optimizer (35 issues),issue_group,,module: optimizer has linked PR,module: optimizer,Create one module: optimizer fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: optimizer paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"3863, 3904, 4660, 6657, 35801, 44954, 50282, 52989, 61343, 67587, 68144, 74904, 80308, 83529, 83901, 84347, 87734, 93154, 94904, 103449, 108090, 108491, 108493, 111508, 116203, 119300, 127284, 127699, 131765, 142378, 147437, 149508, 160637, 173066, 179143",,35,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: optimizer bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #116203: has linked PR; labels: module: optimizer, triaged, better-engineering, actionable; title: Refactor precision handling in test/test_optim.py | issue #131765: has linked PR; labels: module: optimizer, module: typing, triaged, actionable; title: [typing] Add missing `__all__` to modules. | issue #142378: has linked PR; labels: module: optimizer, low priority, triaged, actionable; title: Support int ste...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e2b99c1554f5236ca0417b708c70456d50f3a6595cae280b24a6e2d35b2139a6
+BUNDLE-1031,bundle:bundle-1031,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: performance (11 issues),issue_group,,#177127 torch.multinomial: add flag to skip input validation (66% of GPU time),module: performance,Create one module: performance fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: performance paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"61243, 110281, 120308, 131739, 136226, 136380, 151722, 175252, 177127, 180915, 181488",,11,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: performance bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #177127: has linked PR; labels: module: performance, triaged, has workaround, function request, bot-triaged; title: torch.multinomial: add flag to skip input validation (66% of GPU time) | issue #120308: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: performance, module: rocm, triaged; title: ROCm: foreach is substantially slower than for loop MI250x | issue #136380: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: pe...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6d76a9e60098590684626bb6e9b0582992d5e1cf01f9fbe910ba43936a758026
+BUNDLE-1032,bundle:bundle-1032,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: pickle (1 issue),issue_group,,#39383 Pickling a Tensor or a Storage is not deterministic,module: pickle,Create one module: pickle fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: pickle paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,39383,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: pickle bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #39383: has linked PR; labels: module: pickle, triaged; title: Pickling a Tensor or a Storage is not deterministic",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",944c4f9c2254db430967b5f67636f0c014c4c0b0a8e4e797cb30291d2aa370a6
+BUNDLE-1033,bundle:bundle-1033,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: pipelining (14 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #184361: [pipelining] PP fails when trying to pipeline any HF transformers model that uses RoPE,module: pipelining,Create one module: pipelining fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: pipelining paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"110775, 116183, 124372, 136363, 153485, 155589, 159711, 160648, 162741, 167425, 167897, 171656, 184361, 185780",,14,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: pipelining bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"dering if something like that at a smaller scale could be implemented for the pipelining module Alternatives No response Additional context #184361 (comment) cc @awgu @wanchaol @fegin @fduwjj @wz337 @wconstab @d4l3k @pragupta @msaroufim @dcci @aditvenk @weifengpy | issue #153485: has linked PR; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: pipelining, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed parallelisms, ptd-bot-triaged;...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",95e214a0b0611decd794521f83d4cba87fa2e8e40ae207cd9ada2a117de04c43
+BUNDLE-1034,bundle:bundle-1034,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: power (1 issue),issue_group,,#109592 test_memory_timeline fails on PPC due to extra temopraries,module: power,Create one module: power fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: power paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,109592,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: power bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #109592: needs maintainer decision; labels: triaged, module: POWER, OSS contribution wanted, oncall: profiler; title: test_memory_timeline fails on PPC due to extra temopraries",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",254060486273524ac4c7742068cc5743ed40f1239a12c8be0f902afe2432bc50
+BUNDLE-1035,bundle:bundle-1035,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: printing (2 issues),issue_group,,#51002 Consider adding context manager support for torch.set_printoptions,module: printing,Create one module: printing fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: printing paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"51002, 76532",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: printing bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #51002: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: printing, triaged, enhancement; title: Consider adding context manager support for torch.set_printoptions | issue #76532: needs design decision; labels: module: printing, triaged, enhancement, needs design, tensor subclass, module: python frontend; title: Add ability to add custom suffixes to tensor repr",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7013ace39f4709af2596106c8fc194328eaac12bded2bd19b1ebc53ddfdacd29
+BUNDLE-1036,bundle:bundle-1036,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: privateuse1 (7 issues),issue_group,,module: privateuse1 has linked PR,module: privateuse1,Create one module: privateuse1 fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: privateuse1 paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"136344, 158911, 170737, 172538, 179008, 179010, 188688",,7,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: privateuse1 bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #170737: has linked PR; labels: triaged, module: PrivateUse1; title: Expect to open the is_privateuseone branch in the LSTM interface of PyTorch's RNN.cpp to develop corresponding LSTM functionality on NPU. | issue #172538: has linked PR; labels: triaged, module: PrivateUse1; title: Support native structured kernel and out_as_primary: true for PrivateUse1 | issue #136344: needs reproduction; labels: needs re...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",aa67b61b3e348b11f1bef45758ef9b13d46db23c11a044c54c449a63ecca7890
+BUNDLE-1037,bundle:bundle-1037,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: pruning (1 issue),issue_group,,#39765 Support mainstream pruning techniques,module: pruning,Create one module: pruning fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: pruning paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,39765,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: pruning bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #39765: needs design decision; labels: feature, triaged, needs research, module: pruning; title: Support mainstream pruning techniques",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ddaf0246a121ddb494c6dd3254c97ba6f1b063386b13f2cd4b4a239e9155eb2b
+BUNDLE-1038,bundle:bundle-1038,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: pt2-dispatcher (13 issues),issue_group,,module: pt2-dispatcher has linked PR,module: pt2-dispatcher,Create one module: pt2-dispatcher fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: pt2-dispatcher paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"129430, 133443, 133592, 145522, 149258, 153044, 158561, 160333, 161494, 169150, 172549, 174131, 188358",,13,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: pt2-dispatcher bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #188358: has linked PR; labels: high priority, triaged, oncall: pt2, module: pt2-dispatcher; title: [Dynamo] Eager and torch.compile behavior mismatch in F.batch_norm with multidimensional bias | issue #153044: has linked PR; labels: high priority, triaged, months, oncall: pt2, module: pt2-dispatcher, PT2-Bug-Bash; title: Unexpected float32 overflow for amp training with torch.compile | issue #133443: has li...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",74350128bf679baa281bbff11cbc69f67286977b742c64867393838f7c8bd81a
+BUNDLE-1039,bundle:bundle-1039,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: pybind (1 issue),issue_group,,"#108041 Undefined Symobl: pybind11::detail::type_caster<at::Tensor, void>::load(pybind11::handle, bool)",module: pybind,Create one module: pybind fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: pybind paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,108041,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: pybind bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #108041: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, triaged, module: pybind; title: Undefined Symobl: pybind11::detail::type_caster<at::Tensor, void>::load(pybind11::handle, bool)",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3dbc054269f2c3e4a6f3134926a758078d7d0980d2ba9adb329f153678032b78
+BUNDLE-1040,bundle:bundle-1040,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: python frontend (18 issues),issue_group,,module: python frontend has linked PR,module: python frontend,Create one module: python frontend fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: python frontend paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"77171, 79842, 106784, 120791, 120819, 122548, 130428, 141994, 144673, 145739, 149097, 149118, 152750, 161863, 170298, 170419, 176078, 188088",,18,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: python frontend bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #188088: has linked PR; labels: triaged, has workaround, function request, module: python frontend, bot-triaged; title: torch.clamp rejects mixed Tensor and Number min/max bounds although Tensor+Tensor and Number+Number both work | issue #161863: has linked PR; labels: triaged, enhancement, module: testing, module: python frontend; title: torch.testing.assert_close doesn't accept tensor-likes | issue #170298...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9d7a969e0db9c90957a7352dd16ed7414be493b9c3ab7784b22447e480c68e0d
+BUNDLE-1041,bundle:bundle-1041,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: pytree (3 issues),issue_group,,#65761 torch.utils._pytree -> stable,module: pytree,Create one module: pytree fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: pytree paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"65761, 119328, 188648",,3,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: pytree bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #65761: has linked PR; labels: high priority, feature, triaged, better-engineering, needs design, module: pytree; title: torch.utils._pytree -> stable | issue #188648: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: serialization, triaged, module: pytree, bot-triaged; title: treespec_dumps does not preserve tuple keys in dict/OrderedDict/defaultdict pytrees, so the round-trip fails with `unhashable type: 'list'`...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8413c740ecd3389219536f7bf14ef93562318e7022f38464340438b324b5a89c
+BUNDLE-1042,bundle:bundle-1042,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: random (2 issues),issue_group,,#169803 [RFC] Add RGE256ctr: A Fast Counter-Mode ARX RNG for PyTorch GeneratorImpl,module: random,Create one module: random fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: random paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"63726, 169803",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: random bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #169803: needs design decision; labels: triaged, enhancement, module: random, needs research; title: [RFC] Add RGE256ctr: A Fast Counter-Mode ARX RNG for PyTorch GeneratorImpl | issue #63726: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, triaged, module: random; title: a problem happened in torch.randperm",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",719825e8a45615d7bda94801b5853ba9a1bd359bb54092372f319e8fb80e15c2
+BUNDLE-1043,bundle:bundle-1043,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: reductions (3 issues),issue_group,,#172854 [test] Add unittest for nanmean output dtype validation (follow-up to #131043),module: reductions,Create one module: reductions fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: reductions paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"129303, 131927, 172854",,3,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: reductions bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #172854: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: tests, triaged, module: reductions; title: [test] Add unittest for nanmean output dtype validation (follow-up to #131043) | issue #131927: needs design decision; labels: feature, triaged, needs research, module: reductions; title: exclude_dim=[...] as a keyword argument to reduce type operations | issue #129303: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproductio...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",bc79d845cddbd58d12c70cdc054cb2906088a38ddc87e9fd5e0ccd1b4138ac42
+BUNDLE-1044,bundle:bundle-1044,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: regression (1 issue),issue_group,,#148317 compile SageAttention faing error C2872: “std” for latest torch nightly,module: regression,Create one module: regression fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: regression paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,148317,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: regression bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #148317: has linked PR; labels: module: windows, triaged, module: regression, oncall: pt2; title: compile SageAttention faing error C2872: “std” for latest torch nightly",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",61efe77561e3aef661753c43ac55a12017686db5c38a61367de488cfd4389917
+BUNDLE-1045,bundle:bundle-1045,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: rocm (15 issues),issue_group,,module: rocm needs maintainer decision,module: rocm,Create one module: rocm fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: rocm paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"55937, 60477, 109204, 141958, 150168, 153566, 168871, 168872, 168875, 168876, 168877, 171568, 176188, 177548, 179951",,15,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: rocm bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #179951: needs maintainer decision; labels: oncall: distributed, module: rocm, triaged, skipped, bot-triaged; title: DISABLED test_scaled_mm (__main__.DistMatrixOpsTestWithLocalTensor) | issue #150168: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: rocm, triaged, topic: performance; title: [ROCm] PyTorch slow on TTS | issue #55937: needs maintainer decision; labels: in progress, module: rocm, module: tests, tria...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4c883cb8422816839bcb2eebc1e2b4a32a353bbcee13921dd37fb51929e463e0
+BUNDLE-1046,bundle:bundle-1046,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: rpc (6 issues),issue_group,,#158724 Problem with RPC on dual stack networks,module: rpc,Create one module: rpc fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: rpc paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"44827, 80774, 81622, 95487, 106851, 158724",,6,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: rpc bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #158724: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, oncall: distributed, triaged, module: rpc, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed infra, ptd-bot-triaged; title: Problem with RPC on dual stack networks | issue #106851: needs maintainer decision; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: rpc, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed infra, ptd-bot-triaged; title: RPC all_gather doesn't work with dynamic world s...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7be1926056827d99095b6c4bc0b7ca3d99755f600bd805dfcd3241e83357c95b
+BUNDLE-1047,bundle:bundle-1047,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: scatter & gather ops (1 issue),issue_group,,#138502 Contribution Proposal: ScatterND Implementation for PyTorch,module: scatter & gather ops,Create one module: scatter & gather ops fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: scatter & gather ops paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,138502,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: scatter & gather ops bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #138502: needs design decision; labels: feature, triaged, needs design, module: scatter & gather ops; title: Contribution Proposal: ScatterND Implementation for PyTorch",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b736ce21206763fce96b3737d82d31eaa91ffa545b7eb5aa854bc921de97c11e
+BUNDLE-1048,bundle:bundle-1048,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: scientific computing (1 issue),issue_group,,#74839 Feature request: Root-finding functionality (like scipy.optimize.root_scalar),module: scientific computing,Create one module: scientific computing fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: scientific computing paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,74839,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: scientific computing bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #74839: needs maintainer decision; labels: feature, triaged, module: scientific computing; title: Feature request: Root-finding functionality (like scipy.optimize.root_scalar)",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",fefa7f21b8d17f2993a7b6e9ac67c2d6e944947d78465c933ff5de580b0cff25
+BUNDLE-1049,bundle:bundle-1049,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: scipy compatibility (2 issues),issue_group,,module: scipy compatibility needs maintainer decision,module: scipy compatibility,Create one module: scipy compatibility fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: scipy compatibility paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"85366, 179784",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: scipy compatibility bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #179784: needs maintainer decision; labels: triaged, enhancement, module: special, module: scipy compatibility, bot-triaged; title: torch.xlogy(0, 0) returns NaN, while in many numerical computing libraries (e.g., SciPy) and common machine learning practice, it is defined as 0. | issue #85366: needs maintainer decision; labels: triaged, module: scipy compatibility; title: More windows for filtering and spect...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",24a110e4b79c15696ae03f27425ac58deacca6dfe410cd3e7daea166bcd9328f
+BUNDLE-1050,bundle:bundle-1050,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: sdpa (8 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #142228: Scaled Dot-Product Attention Invalid Configuration Error on Large batch size,module: sdpa,Create one module: sdpa fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: sdpa paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"117016, 117974, 120589, 142228, 161757, 162588, 179382, 187770",,8,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: sdpa bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"ient-attention (cutlass FMHA) kernel that wraps when the sequence index crosses 2**16. Note a separate failure mode exists for large batch (#142228) that DOES raise (grid-dim launch error); the seq-length case here is silent, consistent with an index wrap rather than a launch-... | issue #117974: needs maintainer decision; labels: triaged, module: sdpa; title: RuntimeError: derivative for aten::_scaled_dot_product...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",73213ad5da541ad0a8166391844f6cbec7ddd4144656e21281efb84ce1a2d7f0
+BUNDLE-1051,bundle:bundle-1051,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: serialization (17 issues),issue_group,,#184219 serialization_id is not deterministic across machines,module: serialization,Create one module: serialization fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: serialization paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"37066, 48580, 48747, 55777, 64143, 71389, 76643, 97772, 113530, 118092, 122099, 128934, 146579, 150998, 160846, 179904, 184219",,17,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: serialization bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #184219: has linked PR; labels: module: serialization, triaged, actionable; title: serialization_id is not deterministic across machines | issue #179904: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, module: serialization, triaged, has workaround, bot-triaged; title: PyTorch 2.6 weights_only=True breaks loading of existing checkpoints | issue #160846: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, module:...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",61cf62f89c62e966b77141f70ed1261f776dd77f9d97e7391c9f4b08de803db7
+BUNDLE-1052,bundle:bundle-1052,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: sparse (5 issues),issue_group,,module: sparse needs maintainer decision,module: sparse,Create one module: sparse fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: sparse paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"97668, 111359, 136258, 171558, 181494",,5,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: sparse bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #181494: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: sparse, feature, triaged, bot-triaged; title: Add support for sparse block-diagonal matrices | issue #97668: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: sparse, triaged; title: sparse_csr_tensor matmul wrong output in bfloat16 | issue #171558: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: sparse, triaged; title: `torch.sparse.spdiags` produces incorrect results...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",cc3a0ed5ecf07bbe96c10312b108fb96bb2b5c806b9b1e0a3c0c2f48088ac837
+BUNDLE-1053,bundle:bundle-1053,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: special (2 issues),issue_group,,#68110 zeta(1/2) returns nan,module: special,Create one module: special fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: special paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"68110, 94542",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: special bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #68110: needs maintainer decision; labels: triaged, module: special; title: zeta(1/2) returns nan | issue #94542: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, triaged, module: special; title: torch.lgamma CUDA driver error",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",22fef1c2c7643fc5175e980cf67cbb4e472e4e1538b12f932f4e712dd68483b9
+BUNDLE-1054,bundle:bundle-1054,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: symm_mem (8 issues),issue_group,,module: symm_mem has linked PR,module: symm_mem,Create one module: symm_mem fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: symm_mem paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"167684, 169035, 169099, 170479, 171495, 185216, 188001, 188005",,8,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: symm_mem bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #185216: has linked PR; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: symm_mem; title: `torch.ops.symm_mem.one_shot_all_reduce` causes `CUDA_ERROR_ILLEGAL_ADDRESS` | issue #169099: has linked PR; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: symm_mem; title: [RFC] Implement StoreExchange.broadcast | issue #188005: needs maintainer decision; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, enhancement, module: symm_mem,...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",071eb228404a44edd5e4196d17bd5bf87393f6c309317505bf4a2edc1fe7301b
+BUNDLE-1055,bundle:bundle-1055,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: tensor creation (1 issue),issue_group,,#121933 Please provide `total_repeat_length` field to PyTorch `repeat` / `repeat_interleave` API,module: tensor creation,Create one module: tensor creation fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: tensor creation paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,121933,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: tensor creation bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #121933: needs design decision; labels: feature, triaged, needs research, module: tensor creation; title: Please provide `total_repeat_length` field to PyTorch `repeat` / `repeat_interleave` API",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8eddabb5747ac39ed5e66bf3c4a1e85825a78875e0a8f7d1f3d2e3a848577e41
+BUNDLE-1056,bundle:bundle-1056,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: tensorpipe (2 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #130513: RuntimeError Occurred In getBar1SizeOfGpu when initializing torch RPC,module: tensorpipe,Create one module: tensorpipe fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: tensorpipe paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"130513, 159354",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: tensorpipe bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"ally clause of TestRPCPickler.test_case to timeout, likely because the RPC init call already failed. The reason is the same as described in #130513 and can be fixed by patching tensorpipe, which unfortunately is archived. Versions PyTorch version: 2.7.1 Is debug build: False C...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3622136cedfa3455b25fa31b1a744491128d10097db162adf616d8ee9a2256f5
+BUNDLE-1057,bundle:bundle-1057,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: testing (1 issue),issue_group,,#138455 Tried to instantiate dummy base class,module: testing,Create one module: testing fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: testing paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,138455,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: testing bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #138455: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, triaged, module: testing; title: Tried to instantiate dummy base class",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3d00fcab5647c63783b6d2f1654b9ca7f0245b80cbf2edbe538fae0517112688
+BUNDLE-1058,bundle:bundle-1058,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: tests (10 issues),issue_group,,#174177 [test] Add error_inputs for nn.Linear module,module: tests,Create one module: tests fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: tests paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"55152, 55159, 60223, 78885, 99082, 160514, 169752, 174177, 177260, 177393",,10,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: tests bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #174177: has linked PR; labels: module: tests, triaged, better-engineering, actionable, function request, bot-triaged; title: [test] Add error_inputs for nn.Linear module | issue #169752: needs maintainer decision; labels: oncall: distributed, module: tests, triaged, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed infra, ptd-bot-triaged; title: if __name__ == ""__main__"": run_tests() cannot be found in the test files under...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",023030b2f3f27143f7a4c180ed601eeaffa171c5d6fcd77a5cf61a76833bfbb1
+BUNDLE-1059,bundle:bundle-1059,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: third_party (1 issue),issue_group,,#143288 EXCEPTION : /python3.11/distutils/core.py,module: third_party,Create one module: third_party fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: third_party paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,143288,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: third_party bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #143288: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, triaged, module: third_party, oncall: pt2; title: EXCEPTION : /python3.11/distutils/core.py",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1b92fae44083c6eff1f186429bc7fe87d6dc3ac13362615b50a4aa68ae58ee4c
+BUNDLE-1060,bundle:bundle-1060,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: typing (7 issues),issue_group,,module: typing has linked PR,module: typing,Create one module: typing fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: typing paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"103109, 146249, 159259, 162373, 165628, 166905, 181861",,7,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: typing bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #146249: has linked PR; labels: module: typing, triaged; title: Replace `*args : Any` with `typing_extensions.TypeVarTuple` | issue #166905: has linked PR; labels: module: typing, triaged; title: Type Annotation for `named_modules()` | issue #162373: has linked PR; labels: module: typing, triaged, actionable; title: Pylint E1102: torch.fft.rfft/istft/irfft and more is not callable | issue #159259: has linked...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",89a3436c44d2af12a5748d71145db7e8f42adb7f9dee62059aacd33c56e83047
+BUNDLE-1061,bundle:bundle-1061,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: viewing and reshaping (1 issue),issue_group,,#97892 A parameterized fill value for triu and tril functions,module: viewing and reshaping,Create one module: viewing and reshaping fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: viewing and reshaping paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,97892,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: viewing and reshaping bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #97892: needs maintainer decision; labels: triaged, enhancement, module: viewing and reshaping; title: A parameterized fill value for triu and tril functions",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f8f3e45f46d2b745e0eceb90dc05d91712d2e81bfb4381b894594ffb5b874625
+BUNDLE-1062,bundle:bundle-1062,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: vllm (2 issues),issue_group,,#138795 compile + allgather with group will fail for stack-style allgather,module: vllm,Create one module: vllm fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: vllm paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"138795, 167820",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: vllm bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #138795: has linked PR; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, oncall: pt2, vllm-compile, pt2d-triage-nov2024, module: vllm, PT2-Bug-Bash; title: compile + allgather with group will fail for stack-style allgather | issue #167820: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, triaged, oncall: pt2, vllm-compile, module: vllm; title: Why torch==2.9 compile qwen3 model with block ptr will crash?",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e46e464be7f701effc3a5f8e9c5c9b65186fe13d019db6e3559b11dae773d703
+BUNDLE-1063,bundle:bundle-1063,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: vmap (3 issues),issue_group,,#116697 Tracing GPU usage of `torch.vmap` vectorized operation using `torch.profiler` cause CUDA OOM,module: vmap,Create one module: vmap fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: vmap paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"77893, 116697, 122729",,3,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: vmap bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #116697: needs maintainer decision; labels: triaged, oncall: profiler, module: vmap; title: Tracing GPU usage of `torch.vmap` vectorized operation using `torch.profiler` cause CUDA OOM | issue #122729: has linked PR; labels: triaged, module: vmap; title: torch.func transforms don't yet support saved tensor hooks. | issue #77893: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, triaged, module: vmap; title: Se...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c1568279467aeb1a0c7a81baf607eb69e5cec10c9acffa8529b4f97d14ee7667
+BUNDLE-1064,bundle:bundle-1064,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: vulkan (1 issue),issue_group,,#155986 Vulkan interoperability,module: vulkan,Create one module: vulkan fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: vulkan paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,155986,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: vulkan bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #155986: needs design decision; labels: triaged, enhancement, needs research, module: vulkan; title: Vulkan interoperability",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ec4272a588213ad45887c7d17ce1911401fa6b57650406e43f7c7e40cf11853f
+BUNDLE-1065,bundle:bundle-1065,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: windows (3 issues),issue_group,,module: windows needs maintainer decision,module: windows,Create one module: windows fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: windows paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"92600, 157989, 167062",,3,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: windows bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #157989: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: windows, triaged, module: xpu; title: [XPU] torch.xpu.mem_get_info() query failed or reports Out-Of-Memory even when there are enough free memory | issue #167062: needs maintainer decision; labels: module: windows, triaged, oncall: pt2; title: How to use torch.compile on Windows GPU? | issue #92600: has linked PR; labels: module: windows, oncall: quantizati...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",112a2a8c85977d45dee73002ac2a31e99ab468514aeac527bd3fa24d73b2ea88
+BUNDLE-1066,bundle:bundle-1066,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: xnnpack (1 issue),issue_group,,#158343 Upgrade to latest XNNPACK,module: xnnpack,Create one module: xnnpack fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: xnnpack paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,158343,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: xnnpack bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #158343: needs maintainer decision; labels: triaged, module: xnnpack; title: Upgrade to latest XNNPACK",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ac182c323f8fe349965c3e2507d445e8032ba608f79d23237f680f3c0f2d56f1
+BUNDLE-1067,bundle:bundle-1067,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: module: xpu (9 issues),issue_group,,module: xpu needs maintainer decision,module: xpu,Create one module: xpu fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for module: xpu paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"134956, 142135, 143239, 164057, 164429, 171938, 173897, 185198, 186548",,9,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: xpu bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #185198: needs maintainer decision; labels: triaged, has workaround, module: xpu, bot-triaged; title: [xpu] Intel GPU telemetry management APIs may not work on Arc A-Series and data center GPUs | issue #142135: needs maintainer decision; labels: triaged, module: xpu; title: Device assert throws a runtime error in cuda backend and results in a crash in xpu backend | issue #143239: needs maintainer decision; l...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3acce8a91b23967b1a6396d904399d54e2a9980657418508d9c7869d8e298b7f
+BUNDLE-1068,bundle:bundle-1068,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: oncall: cpu inductor (1 issue),issue_group,,#93531 TorchInductor CPU Performance Dashboard,oncall: cpu inductor,Create one oncall: cpu inductor fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for oncall: cpu inductor paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,93531,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: cpu inductor bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #93531: needs maintainer decision; labels: triaged, oncall: pt2, oncall: cpu inductor; title: TorchInductor CPU Performance Dashboard",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",941668aa8c7a26bb352a68683d2a27176bb76955ca6b810e1f0fd011b61b7553
+BUNDLE-1069,bundle:bundle-1069,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: oncall: distributed (55 issues),issue_group,,#140497 C++ standard library functions not found when compiling c10d debug handlers,oncall: distributed,Create one oncall: distributed fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for oncall: distributed paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"16654, 29891, 43859, 47832, 76760, 78638, 79388, 85949, 88626, 89197, 90245, 90509, 97872, 99614, 103626, 107177, 111131, 111646, 111943, 113114, 113376, 117159, 117755, 119758, 119856, 119890, 120516, 121543, 121605, 121606, 121944, 123815, 124101, 124204, 124317, 130530, 131737, 136122, 136248, 136425, 136866, 137505, 137524, 139280, 139579, 139739, 140497, 143906, 144239, 144851, 145726, 152442, 152710, 159635, 165959",,55,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: distributed bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #140497: has linked PR; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed infra, ptd-bot-triaged; title: C++ standard library functions not found when compiling c10d debug handlers | issue #165959: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, oncall: distributed, triaged, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed infra, ptd-bot-triaged; title: torch.distributed.DistStoreError: use_libuv was re...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6b5625f05358ece9d521d3fdcb1799c0cfa32b43a81389e52d2527ad9fe8e017
+BUNDLE-1070,bundle:bundle-1070,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: oncall: distributed (58 issues),issue_group,,oncall: distributed needs maintainer decision batch 4,oncall: distributed,Create one oncall: distributed fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for oncall: distributed paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"72034, 74666, 74824, 75657, 75936, 76387, 76395, 76527, 144856, 145170, 145376, 146565, 146813, 152427, 153350, 153369, 153822, 154102, 154116, 154327, 154345, 154370, 154563, 154621, 155467, 155664, 155892, 155916, 156002, 156627, 156942, 157318, 157781, 158016, 159563, 159686, 160006, 160731, 160950, 162032, 162237, 163546, 163678, 163913, 165653, 167288, 167305, 167832, 169275, 169841, 170290, 173164, 173362, 173608, 173789, 187996, 188317, 188542",,58,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: distributed bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #154370: needs maintainer decision; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed infra, ptd-bot-triaged; title: [C10D] Blackwell B200: NotImplementedError: Could not run '_c10d_functional_autograd::all_to_all_single' with arguments from the 'CUDA' backend. | issue #154345: needs maintainer decision; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed infra, ptd-bo...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f15a514ab9e78881237dbb0bad7c8ed0aefdb4658ae48200518442fc1241bb61
+BUNDLE-1071,bundle:bundle-1071,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: oncall: export (6 issues),issue_group,,"Review thread: 2 issues - issue #111693: [export] 14k models: AssertionError: graph-captured input # 2, of type <class 'torch.nn.parameter.Parameter'>, is not among original inputs of types",oncall: export,Create one oncall: export fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for oncall: export paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"111693, 112043, 134533, 147991, 186381, 186594",,6,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: export bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"Similar issue as: #112043 | issue #186594: needs maintainer decision; labels: triaged, oncall: pt2, oncall: export, bot-triaged; title: torch.ops.higher_order.associative_scan cannot be torch.export'ed | issue #186381: needs maintainer decision; labels: triaged, oncall: pt2, oncall: export; title: [export] No-op contiguous() elided during tracing bakes trace-time layout into the graph; downstream view becomes layo...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",98e8a04d1f4d43170ffb01c1f926dc6053fd8d65e0539132a737144a98415a5b
+BUNDLE-1072,bundle:bundle-1072,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: oncall: jit (4 issues),issue_group,,oncall: jit needs reproduction,oncall: jit,Create one oncall: jit fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for oncall: jit paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"20805, 34937, 34948, 35990",,4,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: jit bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #34948: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, oncall: jit, triaged; title: TracerWarning: Output nr 1. of the traced function does not match the corresponding output of the Python function | issue #35990: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, oncall: jit, triaged; title: [JIT] Tensor method API behavior discrepancy, Tensor.detach(..) | issue #34937: needs reproduction; labels: needs repro...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7ff096b3324edf39925eb4e9ca9c523c26f73cf1b26c96e76651db6fbf92f7ee
+BUNDLE-1073,bundle:bundle-1073,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: oncall: mobile (1 issue),issue_group,,#54577 Question when I use Pytorch Mobile,oncall: mobile,Create one oncall: mobile fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for oncall: mobile paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,54577,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: mobile bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #54577: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, triaged, oncall: mobile; title: Question when I use Pytorch Mobile",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c12b3481b613443743d0fbbffd493adb38a660ab5b8880f3ba10e12480286377
+BUNDLE-1074,bundle:bundle-1074,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: oncall: pt2 (10 issues),issue_group,,oncall: pt2 needs reproduction,oncall: pt2,Create one oncall: pt2 fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for oncall: pt2 paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"125557, 132929, 133078, 143337, 159196, 159669, 162728, 172522, 172547, 177053",,10,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: pt2 bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #172547: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, triaged, oncall: pt2; title: Cold start models with compile-cache have significant overhead | issue #159669: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, triaged, oncall: pt2; title: Torch Compile. CudaGraphs Memory leak | issue #159196: needs reproduction; labels: needs reproduction, triaged, oncall: pt2; title: torch.compile: device of tensor swit...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2b2b847e6370d48e181a7d313cf760118efa2ae3caa3e45b7205c6487ccf6995
+BUNDLE-1075,bundle:bundle-1075,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: oncall: quantization (1 issue),issue_group,,#111471 test_learnable_forward_per_channel fails due to integer overflow,oncall: quantization,Create one oncall: quantization fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for oncall: quantization paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,111471,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: quantization bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #111471: has linked PR; labels: oncall: quantization, triaged; title: test_learnable_forward_per_channel fails due to integer overflow",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",099682e4d4a17e76e7d118aa43df40512f7a9ffed2cf1865b639cb2c9da9c693
+BUNDLE-1076,bundle:bundle-1076,new_code_or_decision_package,New code/decision package,patch-plan bundle,New code/decision package: oncall: releng (2 issues),issue_group,,oncall: releng needs maintainer decision,oncall: releng,Create one oncall: releng fix-or-decision package for the covered issue group(s).,Keeps uncertain issues represented while still minimizing maintainer context switches.,Run focused tests for oncall: releng paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"136275, 159516",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: releng bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #136275: needs maintainer decision; labels: oncall: releng, triaged; title: Please offer `<version>+cpu`-versioned packages for MacOS and linux ARM CPU-only builds | issue #159516: needs maintainer decision; labels: oncall: releng, triaged, better-engineering; title: Validate PyPI Wheel Binary Size failing for >3months",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",aba795a482c6b22eea014b960038fae8d25a2bd46d9670cb7946e9f39ef649a2
+BUNDLE-1077,bundle:bundle-1077,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: general (1 issue),issue_group,,#48365 Custom exception for out of memory,general,Open one maintainer code PR for the general blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for general paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,48365,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This general bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against src/, test/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #48365: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, feature, triaged, better-engineering; title: Custom exception for out of memory",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",29ba138e34c5a2669526c2a4fd64f547f604f7067e67fc97f3877ec28f7f46b5
+BUNDLE-1078,bundle:bundle-1078,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: 64-bit (4 issues),issue_group,,module: 64-bit high-priority/blocker,module: 64-bit,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: 64-bit blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: 64-bit paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"2576, 43115, 155293, 176784",,4,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: 64-bit bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #176784: high-priority/blocker; labels: module: crash, module: nn, module: cuda, triaged, module: 64-bit, module: edge cases, bot-triaged; title: [CUDA] AdaptiveAvgPool2d: START_IND macro causes int32 overflow → OOB read | issue #155293: high-priority/blocker; labels: module: crash, triaged, module: 64-bit, module: random, module: mps; title: [MPS] 5D 4Mln rng attempts fail with internal error | llapse to be...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c277f8fb5376f192789a1a9cbfe38bdb1f5588a8363f7ca2724546bcd0f117f6
+BUNDLE-1079,bundle:bundle-1079,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: abi (1 issue),issue_group,,#20748 Segmentation fault when use torch::from_blob,module: abi,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: abi blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: abi paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,20748,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: abi bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #20748: high-priority/blocker; labels: module: crash, module: cpp, module: abi, triaged; title: Segmentation fault when use torch::from_blob",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f851ef53624dfbe8888046f78c57806943e5ccf0c3b6cf86dfc01b4d6022860f
+BUNDLE-1080,bundle:bundle-1080,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: activation checkpointing (7 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 4 issues - issue #112583: Nesting no_grad in autocast causes backwards graph to be (partially) lost outside of no_grad,module: activation checkpointing,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: activation checkpointing blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: activation checkpointing paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"65766, 77284, 82293, 112583, 139989, 141896, 169934",,7,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: activation checkpointing bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"e the same issue with Pytorch 2.0. Some related issues: https://discuss.pytorch.org/t/autocast-and-torch-no-grad-unexpected-behaviour/93475 #65766 | The root cause should be that autocast cache does not key on requires grad. #112583 What happens is that when checkpoint recomputes, we are in a fresh autocast context that did not first run the same module under no-grad, e | This is a duplicate of #112583 There was a...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",29c52b2653938a353d174e9ccf5dc7f10fe174220c951cd5078a57e2074e1d4f
+BUNDLE-1081,bundle:bundle-1081,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: advanced indexing (2 issues),issue_group,,module: advanced indexing high-priority/blocker,module: advanced indexing,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: advanced indexing blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: advanced indexing paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"107699, 139242",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: advanced indexing bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #107699: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, triaged, module: advanced indexing, actionable; title: index.Tensor_out & index_put.out errors or segfaults with indices list containing only null tensors | issue #139242: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, triaged, module: advanced indexing; title: Tensor.index_reduce produces incorrect result",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b6ba696da4b1309a698bc3ea4af2a26451845a85a4fe3416b3658ac55ebb06a1
+BUNDLE-1082,bundle:bundle-1082,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: amp (automated mixed precision) (5 issues),issue_group,,"Review thread: 3 issues - issue #93880: `PYTORCH_DEBUG_MODE`, better invalid index embedding lookup error message on cuda",module: amp (automated mixed precision),Open one maintainer code PR for the module: amp (automated mixed precision) blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: amp (automated mixed precision) paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"47056, 93880, 99640, 99918, 188955",,5,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: amp (automated mixed precision) bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"s that are not at native op boundary. For example pre-condition checking in some autograd formulas here EDIT: and also at higher level like #99640. I think it would be good to: Make sure the API works well with a non-Mode API. I guess global flag-based. This kind of C++ API fe... | 🚀 The feature, motivation and pitch RFC: Debug Mode Inspired by issue #93880, this RFC proposes to design a DEBUG mode for PyTorch eag...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",135dfdc9ef62399b512dd25ad8738a6152c6b6ad12dea895dd912fb8a4d17218
+BUNDLE-1083,bundle:bundle-1083,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: aotdispatch (2 issues),issue_group,,module: aotdispatch high-priority/blocker,module: aotdispatch,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: aotdispatch blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: aotdispatch paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"179804, 181869",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: aotdispatch bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #181869: high-priority/blocker; labels: module: pickle, triaged, module: regression, oncall: pt2, module: aotdispatch, module: inductor, module: pt2-dispatcher, module: vllm, bot-triaged; title: [vllm] [torch nightly] AOTAutogradCache.save: _pickle.PicklingError on triton launcher (DFlashDraftModel speculative-decode path) | issue #179804: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, module: autograd, triag...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a5955b9184d6d66f34174a07b873b91689ca663526dd15eaaeb25e4a45b31c6b
+BUNDLE-1084,bundle:bundle-1084,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: aotinductor (1 issue),issue_group,,"#157128 Windows Source Build Fails with OSError: [WinError 126] on aoti_custom_ops.dll for RTX 5080 (sm_120), Pre-built PyTorch Works",module: aotinductor,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: aotinductor blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: aotinductor paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,157128,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: aotinductor bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #157128: high-priority/blocker; labels: module: build, module: windows, triaged, module: regression, module: aotinductor, PT2-Bug-Bash; title: Windows Source Build Fails with OSError: [WinError 126] on aoti_custom_ops.dll for RTX 5080 (sm_120), Pre-built PyTorch Works",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",50b633bf1dd4f5e0eab9433d9bf304fde806dc318ecdd43e2bdbdd4377b26b6d
+BUNDLE-1085,bundle:bundle-1085,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: arm (10 issues),issue_group,,module: arm high-priority/blocker,module: arm,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: arm blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: arm paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"78924, 136299, 141083, 146857, 151680, 170787, 176285, 178726, 186952, 188336",,10,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: arm bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #188336: high-priority/blocker; labels: module: performance, module: ci, triaged, module: regression, module: arm, oncall: pt2, oncall: cpu inductor, arm priority; title: AArch64 CPU - Inductor benchmark Regressions | issue #186952: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, module: ci, triaged, module: macos, module: arm, bot-triaged; title: GPU is not accessible on some MacOS-15 runners | issue #178726:...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8aebf16242c2830fe7224212776c121689c83133fa6edc3374d0740f15e33e79
+BUNDLE-1086,bundle:bundle-1086,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: assert failure (1 issue),issue_group,,#51083 apex internal assert failed,module: assert failure,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: assert failure blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: assert failure paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,51083,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: assert failure bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #51083: high-priority/blocker; labels: module: dependency bug, triaged, module: assert failure, module: regression; title: apex internal assert failed",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a451ef9af4c500a3a921d7a179571cad696ea31089e9cf53bc80657bf2b092d5
+BUNDLE-1087,bundle:bundle-1087,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: autograd (14 issues),issue_group,,module: autograd high-priority/blocker,module: autograd,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: autograd blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: autograd paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"13402, 28980, 33867, 38231, 53796, 60835, 65366, 70108, 73349, 76543, 81532, 120622, 177561, 181534",,14,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: autograd bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #181534: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, needs reproduction, module: autograd, module: nn, module: loss, triaged, module: correctness (silent), bot-triaged; title: CTCLoss backward is inconsistent with its forward derivative with respect to the documented log_probs input. | issue #177561: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, needs reproduction, module: autograd, module: cuda, triaged,...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8ab955922f533dc85177cabb9da5f99c5eddae894496ecc0b47b0e209f0b0f0e
+BUNDLE-1088,bundle:bundle-1088,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: batching (2 issues),issue_group,,"Review thread: 2 issues - issue #69801: Dropout2d doesn't drop channels for (C, H, W)",module: batching,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: batching blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: batching paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"69801, 69960",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: batching bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,🐛 Describe the bug Related #69801 FeatureAlphaDropout also has similar problem. import torch import torch.nn as nn from torch.testing._internal.common_utils import freeze_rn,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ada304059bf1afbcb503a4362b6084954837e4329bea748b064366d9d90be121
+BUNDLE-1089,bundle:bundle-1089,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: bc-breaking (1 issue),issue_group,,#157461 vLLM tests failing in torch 2.8rc but passing with torch 2.7,module: bc-breaking,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: bc-breaking blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: bc-breaking paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,157461,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: bc-breaking bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #157461: high-priority/blocker; labels: module: bc-breaking, triaged, module: regression, module: vllm; title: vLLM tests failing in torch 2.8rc but passing with torch 2.7",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6c079c739b42933e406bd86de5499d423f8b23e0c70056a5240a61b2bb7fbdbb
+BUNDLE-1090,bundle:bundle-1090,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: benchmark (2 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #188557: operator_microbenchmark ROCm gfx950 job never completes -- runs 8h+ and is cancelled at the workflow timeout,module: benchmark,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: benchmark blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: benchmark paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"188557, 189077",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: benchmark bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"d-environment linux-jammy-cuda13.0-py3.12-gcc11-sm100, single unsharded (1, 1) job on one Blackwell GPU. This is the NVIDIA/b200 sibling of #188557 (which tracks the same failure mode on ROCm gfx950). Same root cause and fix levers; different infra/owners, so filing separately...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",73e3d2a6d2535596e70900397e93ee6a9828bb7dbe548f3961653a9bb5fa2766
+BUNDLE-1091,bundle:bundle-1091,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: bfloat16 (2 issues),issue_group,,module: bfloat16 high-priority/blocker,module: bfloat16,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: bfloat16 blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: bfloat16 paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"155393, 184431",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: bfloat16 bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #184431: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, module: numerical-stability, triaged, module: regression, module: bfloat16, module: correctness (silent), module: sdpa, module: vllm, bot-triaged; title: [vllm] [2.12 regression][multimodal] Qwen2-Audio text-then-audio_embeds: prompt_embeds vs raw-text outputs diverge under --enforce-eager | issue #155393: high-priority/blocker; labels: module: crash, tr...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e9f742bd2a91ab65d960f8401fc3aa9dfadfc5aadda18a4b68689ef830c083b5
+BUNDLE-1092,bundle:bundle-1092,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: binaries (28 issues),issue_group,,module: binaries high-priority/blocker batch 1,module: binaries,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: binaries blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: binaries paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"34058, 35418, 36152, 41661, 47116, 60628, 78475, 78489, 82098, 88882, 90608, 91570, 92226, 93081, 93955, 108532, 109014, 120995, 159454, 161358, 161865, 163675, 165448, 168997, 178841, 182263, 182949, 186516",,28,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: binaries bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #178841: high-priority/blocker; labels: needs reproduction, module: binaries, module: crash, triaged, module: macos, has workaround, bot-triaged, bot-mislabeled; title: Importing torch before QApplication on macOS prevents Qt from discovering cocoa platform plugin (inverse of #11326) | issue #186516: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, module: binaries, module: rocm, triaged, has workaround, bot-tr...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3fb124be4e2c8a8d70617263604cafe109653014378bc9e363ea72be271bffbb
+BUNDLE-1093,bundle:bundle-1093,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: bootcamp (2 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #16897: Implement `numpy.random.choice` equivalent,module: bootcamp,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: bootcamp blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: bootcamp paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"16897, 82761",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: bootcamp bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"yTorch could also implement the equivalent of numpy's np.random.choice(), which has an outstanding pull request as described in this issue: #16897 Additional context No response",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",765e501244582d06ffb75de8e654c2f160765e71cf431d9adc69b3132d31874e
+BUNDLE-1094,bundle:bundle-1094,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: build (18 issues),issue_group,,module: build high-priority/blocker,module: build,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: build blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: build paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"35597, 38122, 51332, 80012, 94544, 98503, 129304, 135637, 145702, 146551, 153733, 153961, 156613, 162884, 164402, 164787, 164957, 178939",,18,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: build bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #178939: high-priority/blocker; labels: module: build, triaged, module: regression, bot-triaged, bot-mislabeled; title: Pytorch needs Kineto even when using USE_KINETO=OFF | issue #156613: high-priority/blocker; labels: needs reproduction, module: crash, module: build, module: cuda, triaged, module: third_party; title: [CUDA 12.9 | sm_120] Build fails on RowwiseScaledMM.cu with PTXAS error (PyTorch 2.8.0a0)...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2528952f0358dc3b7c86e4d2df5a7a3a01c1ad55fba3885810715e1fc779980f
+BUNDLE-1095,bundle:bundle-1095,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: c10d (3 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #76865: Object-base collectives create tensors at unexpected devices,module: c10d,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: c10d blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: c10d paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"59745, 76865, 77200",,3,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: c10d bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"ow object collectives / rpc to send tensors around without copying them to the CPU first. Additional context This is a known issue for PTD: #76865 cc @mruberry | issue #59745: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, oncall: distributed, triaged, better-engineering, pt_distributed_rampup, module: c10d; title: [c10d] Work objects should have a general operator<<",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",32aa9ec5dd081506fbb28ad28ab4867e1855ae2fcef4179aa57eb6ace1a9fe53
+BUNDLE-1096,bundle:bundle-1096,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: ci (19 issues),issue_group,,module: ci high-priority/blocker batch 1,module: ci,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: ci blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: ci paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"49392, 51863, 54418, 64794, 67448, 67712, 72189, 81127, 82894, 83393, 88842, 123219, 137098, 148699, 158728, 161295, 164562, 172907, 187951",,19,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: ci bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #187951: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, module: ci, module: tests, triaged, module: regression, oncall: pt2, module: inductor, bot-triaged; title: inductor_timm tests has been broken since 6/12 | issue #161295: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, module: ci, triaged, actionable, oncall: pt2, module: inductor, unstable, PT2-Bug-Bash; title: UNSTABLE inductor-periodic / cuda12.8-py3.10...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",22c8c7d3844ecfe9f22f4c5784e20531816e1ed614b0558aa507e68094325ac4
+BUNDLE-1097,bundle:bundle-1097,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: compile ux (1 issue),issue_group,,#146798 Torch 2.6 Unexpected Graph Break with SubConfigProxy,module: compile ux,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: compile ux blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: compile ux paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,146798,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: compile ux bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #146798: high-priority/blocker; labels: triaged, module: regression, oncall: pt2, module: graph breaks, module: compile ux; title: Torch 2.6 Unexpected Graph Break with SubConfigProxy",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",22aa3e29acd81077d129f1aea560d17d076b6c4bf783a43626e5befb97ed679f
+BUNDLE-1098,bundle:bundle-1098,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: complex (5 issues),issue_group,,module: complex high-priority/blocker,module: complex,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: complex blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: complex paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"46155, 55375, 57534, 146286, 188864",,5,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: complex bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #188864: high-priority/blocker; labels: module: crash, module: error checking, triaged, module: complex, module: fft, module: mps, topic: fuzzer, bot-triaged; title: [MPS] torch.fft.hfft aborts on 5D complex64 input with dim=0 | issue #146286: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, triaged, module: complex, module: correctness (silent); title: Non-blocking GPU to CPU copy of complex numbers with the d...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7d80aba12b98129a84e013b222ca61cc1f0ec3a59ef0a6e764acf0f910f426a2
+BUNDLE-1099,bundle:bundle-1099,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: convolution (5 issues),issue_group,,module: convolution high-priority/blocker,module: convolution,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: convolution blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: convolution paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"48400, 73179, 142209, 143481, 184027",,5,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: convolution bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #184027: high-priority/blocker; labels: module: crash, module: convolution, triaged, oncall: pt2, module: inductor, bot-triaged, repro:agent:h100:repro_fail:not_reproduced; title: [inductor] `torch.compile` crashes on convolutions when weight is a plain tensor — stride prediction mismatch | issue #143481: high-priority/blocker; labels: module: crash, module: nn, module: error checking, module: convolution, t...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9956003e3fd07458e0487e127d0bc484adc75ef8f5132a2479707664de1b9712
+BUNDLE-1100,bundle:bundle-1100,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: correctness (silent) (13 issues),issue_group,,module: correctness (silent) high-priority/blocker,module: correctness (silent),Open one maintainer code PR for the module: correctness (silent) blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: correctness (silent) paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"58005, 65815, 73792, 94691, 102911, 102971, 107668, 132086, 154312, 163539, 165123, 178880, 187319",,13,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: correctness (silent) bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #187319: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, triaged, has workaround, module: custom-operators, module: correctness (silent), module: fx, oncall: pt2, module: inductor, module: pt2-dispatcher, bot-triaged; title: torch.compile FX graph does not distinguish custom ops with the same name but different mutates_args | issue #178880: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, triaged, module: correct...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f801f166f95916ca63280967125940b481b3a9ae21664a5faf8f9c5cf1e91d0a
+BUNDLE-1101,bundle:bundle-1101,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: cpp (7 issues),issue_group,,module: cpp high-priority/blocker,module: cpp,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: cpp blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: cpp paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"52663, 53895, 71391, 83577, 106700, 140272, 186212",,7,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: cpp bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #186212: high-priority/blocker; labels: module: crash, module: cpp, module: cpu, triaged, module: norms and normalization, bot-triaged; title: C++ API: at::batch_norm crashes with an internal assertion on invalid inputs | issue #53895: high-priority/blocker; labels: needs reproduction, module: crash, module: cpp, triaged; title: terminate called after throwing an instance of 'c10::Error' what(): isTuple() IN...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4991abf11db5e716a75584cf8952bbccb7f44c4efaa1253d044210357d952bca
+BUNDLE-1102,bundle:bundle-1102,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: cpp-extensions (4 issues),issue_group,,module: cpp-extensions high-priority/blocker,module: cpp-extensions,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: cpp-extensions blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: cpp-extensions paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"63749, 89006, 143780, 163501",,4,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: cpp-extensions bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #163501: high-priority/blocker; labels: module: cpp-extensions, triaged, module: regression, module: dispatch, module: dynamic shapes, llm-amenable, PT2-Bug-Bash; title: Improve Registration Error message with const SymIntArrayRef&in PyTorch 2.5+ | issue #143780: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, needs reproduction, module: crash, module: cpp-extensions, triaged, has workaround; title: Looking fo...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9dc3e27d79d298ad23ee59c92ea8e1259b47f443df264a8333e0ce4d76a8c390
+BUNDLE-1103,bundle:bundle-1103,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: cpu (16 issues),issue_group,,module: cpu high-priority/blocker,module: cpu,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: cpu blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: cpu paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"26165, 41486, 42784, 42815, 64412, 64535, 73174, 73185, 73186, 113037, 125247, 134198, 152979, 171606, 175436, 177906",,16,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: cpu bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #177906: high-priority/blocker; labels: needs reproduction, module: performance, module: windows, module: cpu, triaged, module: openmp, module: multithreading, module: regression, bot-triaged; title: CPU: 2x CPU utilization regression in 2.9+ with no proportional wall-clock improvement | issue #171606: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, needs reproduction, module: cpu, triaged, module: determinism...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0ebf37349b14e18d0a2399664d624261f7b2b5fd6ee3660e42cebd530eb91c67
+BUNDLE-1104,bundle:bundle-1104,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: crash (25 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #120597: floating point exception on `torch.fmod` when x is large negative integer and y is `-1`,module: crash,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: crash blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: crash paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"45111, 85329, 87960, 87961, 88148, 94594, 94765, 113586, 120597, 121343, 142048, 157704, 175614, 176426, 177714, 178038, 178892, 179891, 184880, 185494, 185839, 187343, 188218, 188733, 188953",,25,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: crash bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"You're correct, torch.lcm internally calls a % b at some point, which is pretty much the same issue as #120597. | issue #176426: high-priority/blocker; labels: needs reproduction, module: crash, module: cuda, triaged, oncall: pt2, module: inductor, upstream triton, bot-triaged, PT2-Bug-Bash; title: Triton kernels with 2 or more tl.load() calls segfault at runtime on sm_120 (NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell). The kern...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5d5292d9d3dbf9fc0c5286d831f032a10b166b69ec05f56ed43ccddbf0e957bb
+BUNDLE-1105,bundle:bundle-1105,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: crash (70 issues),issue_group,,module: crash high-priority/blocker batch 3,module: crash,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: crash blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: crash paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"26120, 29498, 31362, 35792, 48555, 50037, 54578, 62308, 62331, 74547, 79014, 81180, 82813, 83070, 84181, 84990, 85214, 85215, 85217, 87446, 88036, 89714, 89718, 90535, 90676, 91533, 91590, 94125, 94669, 94696, 94698, 96277, 98136, 99200, 106362, 107429, 115416, 117254, 117431, 121235, 126385, 127102, 127275, 128503, 128690, 128691, 128692, 128695, 133334, 136217, 136704, 136709, 136714, 136719, 138425, 139987, 140945, 141358, 141481, 149941, 153203, 154424, 154887, 156723, 157097, 158154, 161760, 171284, 172011, 184878",,70,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: crash bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #31362: high-priority/blocker; labels: needs reproduction, module: crash, triaged; title: sklearn and pytorch incompatibility issue | issue #29498: high-priority/blocker; labels: needs reproduction, module: crash, triaged; title: ""malloc(): memory corruption (fast)"", action=3) at malloc.c | issue #184878: high-priority/blocker; labels: module: crash, low priority, module: error checking, triaged, module: edg...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2a2d2435db18726d943aa1fbe29cf2f944988ca8ecce8540a4ce682895ca670e
+BUNDLE-1106,bundle:bundle-1106,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: crash (59 issues),issue_group,,module: crash high-priority/blocker batch 6,module: crash,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: crash blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: crash paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"5353, 6998, 16953, 19739, 25518, 35151, 38623, 42452, 43005, 43484, 47161, 49520, 50038, 51134, 51732, 59645, 72182, 74422, 92776, 96056, 97109, 103966, 104342, 119367, 133625, 141229, 141847, 142221, 142837, 142838, 143480, 143482, 143483, 143485, 143490, 145065, 145071, 145259, 145267, 145604, 146787, 146789, 146791, 146793, 146794, 147362, 149820, 150388, 152777, 152824, 152913, 153231, 154422, 154882, 155201, 155981, 157098, 159713, 161874",,59,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: crash bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #133625: high-priority/blocker; labels: module: crash, triaged, module: mps; title: Binary Cross Entropy crashes kernel on apple silicon with singleton dimensions | issue #119367: high-priority/blocker; labels: module: crash, triaged, module: mps; title: Updating a slice on CPU with a slice from MPS results in an error | issue #104342: high-priority/blocker; labels: module: crash, triaged, module: mps; title...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6495b61c83156debe7358bcc75e256b71775d1bd331854698407f3a74f8adc70
+BUNDLE-1107,bundle:bundle-1107,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: crash (8 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #98537: Segfault when using torch.ops.* to access de-registered op,module: crash,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: crash blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: crash paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"94668, 94808, 96275, 96276, 98537, 98541, 141218, 141219",,8,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: crash bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"m"", ""CPU"") def my_sum(*args, **kwargs): return args[0] x = torch.tensor([1, 2]) self.assertEqual(torch.ops.foo.sum(x), x) Likely related to #98537, unsure if same exact issue. Versions master cc @ezyang @bhosmer @smessmer @ljk53 @bdhirsh | e output is: Segmentation fault (core dumped) The large value and zero in input's shape might be the cause of this bug, which is similar to #96275. Versions Collecting environme...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5528e9d1723ec4008bbcb8c595e3fc88f8bf847e11d031b01d32bb7e70063f47
+BUNDLE-1108,bundle:bundle-1108,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: cublas (1 issue),issue_group,,#44428 Support for CUDA matrix multiplication on long (and other integer) tensors,module: cublas,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: cublas blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: cublas paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,44428,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: cublas bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #44428: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, module: cuda, triaged, module: cublas, module: linear algebra, needs design, function request; title: Support for CUDA matrix multiplication on long (and other integer) tensors",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9dfdbb31e286357710936a12393a3f47fec8080d2fca9023183f58ae236d18ad
+BUNDLE-1109,bundle:bundle-1109,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: cuda (19 issues),issue_group,,module: cuda high-priority/blocker batch 1,module: cuda,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: cuda blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: cuda paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"22259, 47844, 49473, 49758, 49877, 49909, 76191, 91754, 101529, 105872, 107363, 116928, 119000, 119261, 128819, 139298, 141133, 155607, 179214",,19,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: cuda bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #179214: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, needs reproduction, module: cuda, triaged, bot-mislabeled; title: cudaErrorLaunchOutOfResources in CTC loss backward on RTX 5090 (sm_120, Blackwell) with CUDA 13.0 | issue #22259: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, needs reproduction, module: cuda, triaged, quansight-nack; title: using multi thread lead to gpu stuck with GPU-util 100% | issue...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d269ab9391ac06b1e60b4201cda23cdf84ada6c0e52c46e9b5674690ef023c80
+BUNDLE-1110,bundle:bundle-1110,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: cuda graphs (1 issue),issue_group,,#167373 Torch Tensor -> Nanobind ndarray breaks cuda graphs on torch 2.9,module: cuda graphs,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: cuda graphs blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: cuda graphs paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,167373,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: cuda graphs bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #167373: high-priority/blocker; labels: triaged, module: regression, module: cuda graphs, module: dlpack, PT2-Bug-Bash; title: Torch Tensor -> Nanobind ndarray breaks cuda graphs on torch 2.9",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",908b496c054c75469655b4866157022b1c7373e5ffc97bb35f3fb3887fe798ae
+BUNDLE-1111,bundle:bundle-1111,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: cudnn (2 issues),issue_group,,module: cudnn high-priority/blocker,module: cudnn,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: cudnn blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: cudnn paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"50879, 137347",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: cudnn bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #137347: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, module: cudnn, triaged, module: regression, module: sdpa; title: cuDNN dBias error starting on 10/2 nightly | issue #50879: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, module: cudnn, module: rnn, triaged; title: Unexpected slow dropout in stacked RNN/LSTM/GRU",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",51ba3789ea169c973ea3054226c6ef2a7553cdfd251b56f80be142fa61a635bd
+BUNDLE-1112,bundle:bundle-1112,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: custom-operators (1 issue),issue_group,,#184549 [vllm] [2.12 regression][Inductor] assert_size_stride (8192 vs 512) in BERT-with-rope AOT-compiled path for Nomic v2 MoE pooling model,module: custom-operators,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: custom-operators blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: custom-operators paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,184549,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: custom-operators bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #184549: high-priority/blocker; labels: triaged, module: regression, module: custom-operators, oncall: pt2, module: inductor, module: pt2-dispatcher, module: vllm, bot-triaged; title: [vllm] [2.12 regression][Inductor] assert_size_stride (8192 vs 512) in BERT-with-rope AOT-compiled path for Nomic v2 MoE pooling model",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5820be49e896a64bd298b6822043b48f7f34c7ca09adee5d9520899846bd8970
+BUNDLE-1113,bundle:bundle-1113,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: data (1 issue),issue_group,,#103117 Observed regress in DataLoader spawn from PyTorch1.13 to PyTorch2.0,module: data,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: data blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: data paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,103117,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: data bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #103117: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, module: performance, triaged, module: regression, module: data; title: Observed regress in DataLoader spawn from PyTorch1.13 to PyTorch2.0",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",433910c6416d2071c0c7808e4cc12fdc91ec722d2e1643f6e21ed61a3ed362b6
+BUNDLE-1114,bundle:bundle-1114,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: data parallel (2 issues),issue_group,,module: data parallel high-priority/blocker,module: data parallel,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: data parallel blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: data parallel paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"36871, 40457",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: data parallel bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #36871: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, needs reproduction, oncall: distributed, triaged, module: determinism, module: data parallel; title: Stochasticity for DistributedDataParallel on CPU but not on GPU | issue #40457: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, triaged, module: regression, module: data parallel; title: DataParallel with Torch 1.5",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b6ad6dde46a1599c7108b0596cc3ef5250cabb38367f373564cf8d712de04864
+BUNDLE-1115,bundle:bundle-1115,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: dataloader (5 issues),issue_group,,module: dataloader high-priority/blocker,module: dataloader,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: dataloader blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: dataloader paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"15849, 39443, 45198, 93846, 122935",,5,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: dataloader bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #45198: high-priority/blocker; labels: needs reproduction, module: dataloader, triaged, module: multithreading, module: regression; title: DataLoader with cv2 and some numpy/cv2 import order causes workers to not work | issue #122935: high-priority/blocker; labels: needs reproduction, module: dataloader, module: memory usage, triaged, module: regression; title: Pytorch 2.1 / 2.2 uses 4x more memory during da...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b2ba10aa0ff845f40c8da16ced0aa10025aebd4add066dc607c451b08578487d
+BUNDLE-1116,bundle:bundle-1116,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: deadlock (3 issues),issue_group,,module: deadlock high-priority/blocker,module: deadlock,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: deadlock blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: deadlock paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"48382, 153050, 186174",,3,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: deadlock bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #186174: high-priority/blocker; labels: module: rocm, triaged, module: deadlock, module: regression, has workaround, module: sdpa, bot-triaged; title: ROCm: Flash/mem-efficient SDPA hangs during batched autoregressive generation with left-padded sequences | issue #153050: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, module: multiprocessing, triaged, module: macos, module: deadlock, module: regression; title...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e1dffa92e9706833c072250e7c59c02c439787aa08af1439739715522b74d986
+BUNDLE-1117,bundle:bundle-1117,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: deploy (1 issue),issue_group,,#71227 Move torch::deploy tests to their own workflow job,module: deploy,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: deploy blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: deploy paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,71227,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: deploy bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #71227: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, triaged, module: deploy; title: Move torch::deploy tests to their own workflow job",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7e83012ebc4011ad8939cb415adb09bee79b780c3e3468eebe4b0ff583ae6219
+BUNDLE-1118,bundle:bundle-1118,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: deprecation (4 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 3 issues - issue #50012: torch.split is divergent from np.split,module: deprecation,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: deprecation blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: deprecation paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"5212, 50012, 50013, 68174",,4,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: deprecation bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"Note this issue was previously discussed in #5212, too. Despite having the same name, torch.split and np.split are different functions. The distinction is a little subtle when just reading | different from NumPy’s split because it asks what size the resulting chunks should be, instead of how many there should be (see this issue (#50012) for details) nonzero → argwhere PyTorch’s nonzero is different from NumPy’s no...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",57d93371bedb42bffdce4551a2736913e048382713a08c72597ca5c663848363
+BUNDLE-1119,bundle:bundle-1119,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: dispatch (3 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #30774: Natively Declarable Fast-path Functions,module: dispatch,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: dispatch blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: dispatch paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"30774, 49372, 189018",,3,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: dispatch bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"see #30774. Now that we have manual_cpp_binding, that should be doable through native_functions.yaml | issue #189018: high-priority/blocker; labels: triaged, module: regression, module: dispatch, module: meta tensors, matrix multiplication, bot-triaged; title: `_scaled_mm_v2` meta implementation checks for device-specific constraints",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6cb1a01de7f4352ff0f3e065051129c1f6e2a1bb139906f9a07c4bb31b8929f8
+BUNDLE-1120,bundle:bundle-1120,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: distance functions (1 issue),issue_group,,#69512 Inconsistent behavior of cosine_similarity between fp16 and fp32 inputs,module: distance functions,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: distance functions blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: distance functions paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,69512,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: distance functions bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #69512: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, module: numerical-stability, triaged, module: half, module: distance functions; title: Inconsistent behavior of cosine_similarity between fp16 and fp32 inputs",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",510c2dbb8c809791b494b4d14cbd57acdf3fc6c72e4feeb307e991de247aab36
+BUNDLE-1121,bundle:bundle-1121,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: distributions (2 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #71149: Memory leak in distributions.multivariate_normal.MultivariateNormal,module: distributions,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: distributions blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: distributions paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"71149, 99042",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: distributions bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"ftplus(sig)) The calculation of eps is copied from the actual implementation of MultivariateNormal. I thought that maybe this is related to #71149, but I don't know. Unfortunately, I can't easily test this on cpu since the framework I'm working with (fastreid) isn't exactly bu...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f4c17c43d582086d06d9eb0c8346163b26c1a00f712b72bd3921fd7e329eb0ae
+BUNDLE-1122,bundle:bundle-1122,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: docker (1 issue),issue_group,,#80431 CMake Error: File /opt/pytorch/build_variables.bzl does not exist.,module: docker,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: docker blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: docker paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,80431,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: docker bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #80431: high-priority/blocker; labels: triaged, module: regression, module: docker; title: CMake Error: File /opt/pytorch/build_variables.bzl does not exist.",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",54048f1dc7e8a5ff7ad0d844cda05d5cab7adcab4f17aa962f8612bbfc3138af
+BUNDLE-1123,bundle:bundle-1123,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: docs (4 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #17199: Deadlock with multiprocessing (using fork) and OpenMP / PyTorch should warn after OMP and fork that multithreading may be broken,module: docs,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: docs blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: docs paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"17199, 57178, 58962, 67237",,4,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: docs bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"ain with the desired number of threads after creating the subprocess. BTW, had you tested it on v1.4 today? A similar issue was reported in #17199 but on v1.0.1. | issue #67237: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, module: docs, triaged; title: [docs] Google finds docs pages that give 404 | issue #57178: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, module: docs, triaged, module: pooling; title: MaxPool2D...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",bbda5d5e522268379698f9e250df0df9ae60d9961d125921337052c9721e4067
+BUNDLE-1124,bundle:bundle-1124,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: dtensor (1 issue),issue_group,,#168058 [DTensor] inconsistency of distributed RNG (Shard(0) != Shard(1) or 8 GPU != 4 GPU != 1 GPU),module: dtensor,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: dtensor blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: dtensor paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,168058,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: dtensor bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #168058: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, oncall: distributed, triaged, module: dtensor; title: [DTensor] inconsistency of distributed RNG (Shard(0) != Shard(1) or 8 GPU != 4 GPU != 1 GPU)",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",301f7f2ff0d782ffc2d492e5a5d8e9d3d44d7362fbabfaee12cb29b7792d0887
+BUNDLE-1125,bundle:bundle-1125,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: error checking (3 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #109819: ValueError: only one element tensors can be converted to Python scalars,module: error checking,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: error checking blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: error checking paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"81195, 109819, 110605",,3,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: error checking bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"🐛 Describe the bug When using math.isfinite with a tensor a wrong ValueError is issued instead of a TypeError. This creates bugs (see #109819). Fixing this issue will fix the other one as well. >>> import math, torch >>> a = torch.randn(5) >>> math.isfinite(a) ----------------... | issue #81195: high-priority/blocker; labels: module: nn, module: error checking, triaged, module: regression, module: norms and normal...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4e93c20a3802f60fba18732a63233cecc2ae19017a6467b90c549c6450b2ac93
+BUNDLE-1126,bundle:bundle-1126,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: faketensor (1 issue),issue_group,,#156819 FakeTensorUpdater doesn't support HOPs,module: faketensor,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: faketensor blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: faketensor paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,156819,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: faketensor bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #156819: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, triaged, oncall: pt2, module: fakeTensor, module: inductor, module: pt2-dispatcher, PT2-Bug-Bash; title: FakeTensorUpdater doesn't support HOPs",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",99815c5d5d558fc696874773edc0262ea0329131b6309b426298701fcb13aea7
+BUNDLE-1127,bundle:bundle-1127,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: floatx (formerly float8) (1 issue),issue_group,,#113663 FP8 types should not participate in type promotion and should have no math ops defined on them,module: floatx (formerly float8),Open one maintainer code PR for the module: floatx (formerly float8) blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: floatx (formerly float8) paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,113663,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: floatx (formerly float8) bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #113663: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, triaged, module: floatx (formerly float8); title: FP8 types should not participate in type promotion and should have no math ops defined on them",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3c2afd87d6960a5176d68c61fa44c6ceeb3b4a4147738cdfa9c40bbfbd6405f5
+BUNDLE-1128,bundle:bundle-1128,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: flop counter (1 issue),issue_group,,#134804 FlopsProfiler double counts sdpa flops,module: flop counter,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: flop counter blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: flop counter paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,134804,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: flop counter bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #134804: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, triaged, module: regression, module: flop counter, module: sdpa; title: FlopsProfiler double counts sdpa flops",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a98795c12daf606b6b0e82906062e8e2017d6471dab97de4d45167708687467b
+BUNDLE-1129,bundle:bundle-1129,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: fsdp (1 issue),issue_group,,#102904 Unable to checkpoint model and optimizer state when using Hybrid Sharding Strategy,module: fsdp,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: fsdp blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: fsdp paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,102904,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: fsdp bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #102904: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, oncall: distributed, triaged, module: fsdp, oncall: distributed checkpointing; title: Unable to checkpoint model and optimizer state when using Hybrid Sharding Strategy",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d5238e95221d7e8a666b16d400f27d694ef8e038a7c5a2b2c216b9098c3a80e3
+BUNDLE-1130,bundle:bundle-1130,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: functorch (5 issues),issue_group,,module: functorch high-priority/blocker,module: functorch,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: functorch blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: functorch paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"92033, 115347, 121711, 124291, 142032",,5,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: functorch bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #121711: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, triaged, module: functorch; title: torch.func.grad hangs on nested differentiation | issue #142032: high-priority/blocker; labels: triaged, module: regression, module: functorch; title: Python 3.12 ""from functorch.einops import rearrange"" fails with ""RuntimeError: First class dim doesn't work with python 3.12"" | issue #92033: high-priority/blocker; label...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b4beec6e6333aa9829981c21e048426091c11cd01cf222d89d8ea835d25f3b4c
+BUNDLE-1131,bundle:bundle-1131,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: inductor (4 issues),issue_group,,module: inductor high-priority/blocker,module: inductor,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: inductor blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: inductor paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"181362, 185346, 188127, 188835",,4,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: inductor bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #188835: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, module: numerical-stability, triaged, module: regression, oncall: pt2, module: inductor, upstream triton, bot-triaged; title: DistillGPT2 fails accuracy on A100 in inductor smoke test | issue #188127: high-priority/blocker; labels: module: performance, module: rocm, module: memory usage, triaged, module: regression, oncall: pt2, module: inductor, bot-tri...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a8f2feae414711fc8a860e081a015e65ab66aa8881efc181a0df0dd89f478b09
+BUNDLE-1132,bundle:bundle-1132,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: infra (2 issues),issue_group,,module: infra high-priority/blocker,module: infra,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: infra blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: infra paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"135885, 136374",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: infra bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #135885: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, triaged, module: macos, module: infra; title: ☂️ 150+ MacOS tests were marked flaky recently | issue #136374: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, triaged, module: infra; title: Runbook for GCP A100 runners should be updated",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7253ac3e017a3178c555af3534af76da5827db5206500a77996594ba14053663
+BUNDLE-1133,bundle:bundle-1133,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: intel (1 issue),issue_group,,#120601 Torchrun arguments shadowing script arguments,module: intel,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: intel blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: intel paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,120601,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: intel bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #120601: high-priority/blocker; labels: triaged, module: regression, module: intel; title: Torchrun arguments shadowing script arguments",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a124503219c980f0864633297af0a7183eaa2eddd56781a5fbee817e20849e4c
+BUNDLE-1134,bundle:bundle-1134,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: memory usage (6 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 3 issues - issue #35600: Increased memory usage in repetitive torch.jit.trace calls,module: memory usage,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: memory usage blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: memory usage paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"35600, 59196, 84051, 86537, 95432, 96726",,6,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: memory usage bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"riments again, and found that just calling jit trace for a same model could trigger this issue. I've corrected the statement above. I think #35600 is a simpler case of mine because it just compiles the same model each time. It's worth to note that after the simpler one being f... | Probably a duplicate of #35600. | Originally reported in #35600, but this issue's description supplements the debugging info present i...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9ae3f71d67fab817c9caf34cd732f17befa7209dc7b11064d5f99ab0f8df2617
+BUNDLE-1135,bundle:bundle-1135,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: mkldnn (1 issue),issue_group,,#121150 ☂️ oneDNN update functional/regression,module: mkldnn,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: mkldnn blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: mkldnn paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,121150,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: mkldnn bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #121150: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, triaged, module: mkldnn; title: ☂️ oneDNN update functional/regression",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",37e7cf52d62d8c808d0083bfad0bc0d55cb2761b26c1dabcf0d5861057e839d0
+BUNDLE-1136,bundle:bundle-1136,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: mps (3 issues),issue_group,,module: mps high-priority/blocker,module: mps,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: mps blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: mps paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"122394, 141836, 143123",,3,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: mps bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #141836: high-priority/blocker; labels: triaged, module: regression, module: mps; title: StrideAPI caused regression in channels-last logic | issue #143123: high-priority/blocker; labels: triaged, module: regression, module: mps; title: MPS incompatibility: Calls into the C++ engine to run the backward pass | issue #122394: high-priority/blocker; labels: module: performance, triaged, module: regression, modu...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",884cada82b97a6229cfc42271daf625107e28c278e05b2264363ee9789e70bd1
+BUNDLE-1137,bundle:bundle-1137,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: multiprocessing (6 issues),issue_group,,module: multiprocessing high-priority/blocker,module: multiprocessing,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: multiprocessing blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: multiprocessing paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"32351, 53625, 60626, 67247, 146828, 180458",,6,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: multiprocessing bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #180458: high-priority/blocker; labels: needs reproduction, module: windows, module: multiprocessing, module: serialization, triaged, module: regression, bot-triaged; title: [Bug] ValueError: I/O operation on closed file during torch.save() on Windows (PyTorch Nightly + CUDA 13.2) | issue #53625: high-priority/blocker; labels: oncall: distributed, module: multiprocessing, triaged, module: regression; title:...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",45fbfda63b970da98d21cd78d9b595d19087ad0e04a5bbbf9827a7accdc20707
+BUNDLE-1138,bundle:bundle-1138,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: nans and infs (1 issue),issue_group,,#160876 F.silu(torch.tensor(float('-inf'))) returns nan instead of 0 in PyTorch 2.7.0+cu128,module: nans and infs,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: nans and infs blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: nans and infs paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,160876,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: nans and infs bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #160876: high-priority/blocker; labels: needs reproduction, triaged, module: NaNs and Infs, module: regression; title: F.silu(torch.tensor(float('-inf'))) returns nan instead of 0 in PyTorch 2.7.0+cu128",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",52ba390872eab04fe612cbaf49d7c739c54884d35f7d105c7af81ebe9eb1a93d
+BUNDLE-1139,bundle:bundle-1139,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: nccl (2 issues),issue_group,,module: nccl high-priority/blocker,module: nccl,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: nccl blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: nccl paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"18300, 152302",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: nccl bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #152302: high-priority/blocker; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: nccl, module: regression; title: NCCL out of memory error after updating to PyTorch 2.7 | issue #18300: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, oncall: distributed, triaged, module: nccl; title: NCCL backend fails when calling broadcast from different threads",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c9bdd8f40f24599e3a1ab0816b5d2845ec9d4cd46513e6073b3c25415180b6ab
+BUNDLE-1140,bundle:bundle-1140,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: nestedtensor (1 issue),issue_group,,#122617 [Regression PyTorch 2.1 & 2.2] `torch._transformer_encoder_layer_fwd` outputs on CUDA/NestedTensorCUDA backends significantly diverge from truth for torch>=2.1 (SDP math)),module: nestedtensor,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: nestedtensor blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: nestedtensor paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,122617,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: nestedtensor bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #122617: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, module: nn, triaged, module: nestedtensor; title: [Regression PyTorch 2.1 & 2.2] `torch._transformer_encoder_layer_fwd` outputs on CUDA/NestedTensorCUDA backends significantly diverge from truth for torch>=2.1 (SDP math))",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3092a5578198f0612e09ea47f31946410cd2daa3ad5f2dbee4e1ff2ab9f9e160
+BUNDLE-1141,bundle:bundle-1141,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: nn (4 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #32918: Interpolate in the “bicubic” mode with the same shape outputs zeros from second sample onwards,module: nn,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: nn blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: nn paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"32918, 34544, 80488, 82068",,4,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: nn bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"Maybe related to #32918. To make sure though: is content.png a 256x256 image? | issue #82068: high-priority/blocker; labels: module: nn, triaged, module: regression; title: upsample_bilinear2d() received an invalid combination of arguments | issue #80488: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, module: nn, triaged; title: Negative values still produced by torch.nn.functional.kl_div",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a7100b7ac217284ed5e4470edb47105677c49d94ac98a91baf02c936d247402b
+BUNDLE-1142,bundle:bundle-1142,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: norms and normalization (1 issue),issue_group,,#100085 [regression] torch.norm with out dtype bfloat16 cause runtime error,module: norms and normalization,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: norms and normalization blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: norms and normalization paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,100085,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: norms and normalization bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #100085: high-priority/blocker; labels: triaged, module: regression, module: norms and normalization; title: [regression] torch.norm with out dtype bfloat16 cause runtime error",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",92574a934de47abbbdd3bd94241386ec339a235590dada345251fee08692d0e8
+BUNDLE-1143,bundle:bundle-1143,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: numpy (4 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #13918: Pytorch very slow to convert list of numpy arrays into tensors,module: numpy,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: numpy blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: numpy paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"13918, 38703, 59237, 60081",,4,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: numpy bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"Per title. Reported internally. See related (but distinct) #13918, which discusses conversion from lists of arrays. cc @mruberry @VitalyFedyunin @ngimel | issue #60081: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, triaged, module: numpy; title: [Bug] numpy is no longer a required dependency | issue #59237: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, triaged, module: numpy; title: Multiplication of `torch.tensor...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",40ad73d121ea4ab0f45bc2be50d4a067f157658632e69ee669e690bba7f2b753
+BUNDLE-1144,bundle:bundle-1144,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: optimizer (1 issue),issue_group,,#110205 RuntimeError: Expected packed scalar Tensor to be of dimension 1. Got 0 instead.,module: optimizer,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: optimizer blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: optimizer paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,110205,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: optimizer bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #110205: high-priority/blocker; labels: module: optimizer, triaged, module: regression, actionable; title: RuntimeError: Expected packed scalar Tensor to be of dimension 1. Got 0 instead.",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d66ed9ee7c9c384badd76aeac5fbe12eecf9f8ddd6a2c842356bf0c7611213f2
+BUNDLE-1145,bundle:bundle-1145,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: performance (3 issues),issue_group,,module: performance high-priority/blocker,module: performance,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: performance blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: performance paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"160296, 169823, 172537",,3,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: performance bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #169823: high-priority/blocker; labels: needs reproduction, module: performance, triaged, module: regression; title: Abnormal CPU usage with ComfyUI | issue #172537: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, module: performance, triaged; title: [Regression] 20x slower vision model forward pass in PyTorch 2.9.1 vs 2.8.0 | issue #160296: high-priority/blocker; labels: module: performance, triaged, module:...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b1995c85a633e25b1bc4d9b679c3c2806a4453d7ea8fe4dbe64a1b1a79d7cae6
+BUNDLE-1146,bundle:bundle-1146,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: pt2 accuracy (1 issue),issue_group,,#113180 Higher train loss and worse evaluation metrics when using `torch.compile()`,module: pt2 accuracy,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: pt2 accuracy blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: pt2 accuracy paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,113180,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: pt2 accuracy bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #113180: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, needs reproduction, triaged, oncall: pt2, module: pt2 accuracy; title: Higher train loss and worse evaluation metrics when using `torch.compile()`",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4407f9dd30fc3fc642de205cd52e0c5dfb7e3e26674d7257d16efd8c33ad4227
+BUNDLE-1147,bundle:bundle-1147,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: pt2-dispatcher (3 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #152954: DTensor placement propagation for `as_strided` missing,module: pt2-dispatcher,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: pt2-dispatcher blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: pt2-dispatcher paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"124484, 152954, 152963",,3,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: pt2-dispatcher bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"This is a child issue of #152963 cc @IvanKobzarev | issue #124484: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, triaged, better-engineering, months, oncall: pt2, module: pt2-dispatcher, PT2-Bug-Bash; title: HOP dispatch isn't faithful",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",db785f1cd26febc977c0ed6f585901f01c9c69bb59ddc09f456245d6bd380cac
+BUNDLE-1148,bundle:bundle-1148,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: pybind (3 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #40137: Improve RPC test debugability,module: pybind,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: pybind blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: pybind paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"40137, 56297, 87283",,3,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: pybind bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"Also relatedly #40137; it would also be nice if the traces reported what locks they held (esp the GIL) so I don't have to sleuth it manually, but that might be d | issue #87283: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, triaged, module: pybind; title: Missing string parsing for some parameter types in python arg parsing logic",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0e3e2ce47388dc08450aa62d7c50350a41edddb11cb0cd53be69dc034dc39e4c
+BUNDLE-1149,bundle:bundle-1149,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: pytree (1 issue),issue_group,,#152535 optree package status in PyTorch,module: pytree,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: pytree blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: pytree paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,152535,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: pytree bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #152535: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, triaged, dependency issue, module: pytree; title: optree package status in PyTorch",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",aca2a86f1cea5b313c95c591c1007ea5e700f0435c9ac11f3c7984857c8e4dc0
+BUNDLE-1150,bundle:bundle-1150,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: regression (9 issues),issue_group,,module: regression high-priority/blocker,module: regression,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: regression blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: regression paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"45136, 68920, 73488, 86704, 114529, 150187, 152292, 152747, 175928",,9,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: regression bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #175928: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, oncall: releng, module: tests, triaged, module: regression, module: vllm, bot-triaged; title: [release 2.11][vllm] Language Models Tests (Extra Standard) 1 test_models[float-jason9693/Qwen2.5-1.5B-apeach] | issue #68920: high-priority/blocker; labels: needs reproduction, triaged, module: regression; title: Breakes with -OO flag in script | issue #150187:...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",706b076d5a430b3f629058b609b7af17885ce533284fdeae422a538a81880121
+BUNDLE-1151,bundle:bundle-1151,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: rocm (1 issue),issue_group,,#85909 Steam Deck Core Dump,module: rocm,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: rocm blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: rocm paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,85909,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: rocm bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #85909: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, module: rocm, triaged; title: Steam Deck Core Dump",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",734de9b895409879ce2a17e56cdccdbdcede79521aee0df839e81f8c1e77d9d3
+BUNDLE-1152,bundle:bundle-1152,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: rpc (2 issues),issue_group,,module: rpc high-priority/blocker,module: rpc,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: rpc blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: rpc paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"46491, 83243",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: rpc bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #83243: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, oncall: distributed, triaged, module: rpc; title: RPC: wait method of Future object return 0 sometimes in rpc framework | issue #46491: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, oncall: distributed, triaged, module: rpc; title: cannot call rpc.init_rpc twice within a single process",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",91a53965412725c8e097ad13bad4b0c4458211e8aeda7a236a45062641fa56e8
+BUNDLE-1153,bundle:bundle-1153,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: serialization (2 issues),issue_group,,module: serialization high-priority/blocker,module: serialization,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: serialization blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: serialization paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"20497, 140230",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: serialization bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #140230: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, needs reproduction, module: serialization, triaged; title: Inconsistent Model Loading with `weights_only=True` for Custom Models | issue #20497: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, module: serialization, triaged; title: Statically make `__setstate__` set all attributes/parameters",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",411a01f90479162befd3f2ec12de65dc8d57db473538f34db302f98e7ffda763
+BUNDLE-1154,bundle:bundle-1154,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: tensor creation (1 issue),issue_group,,#48558 [FR] tensor ctors should support directly creating in shared memory,module: tensor creation,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: tensor creation blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: tensor creation paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,48558,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: tensor creation bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #48558: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, feature, triaged, module: tensor creation; title: [FR] tensor ctors should support directly creating in shared memory",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3b2be6d430e790827bfe86b03106a0260b970d21943f0ac134eebc75d075ea80
+BUNDLE-1155,bundle:bundle-1155,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: tests (1 issue),issue_group,,#39061 Some @slowtests are never run in CI,module: tests,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: tests blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: tests paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,39061,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: tests bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #39061: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, module: tests, triaged, quansight-nack; title: Some @slowtests are never run in CI",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",dee19e2e10f652fe04566918c9d971f4cbeb8081270f4ae29a7f1b519c096075
+BUNDLE-1156,bundle:bundle-1156,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: typing (1 issue),issue_group,,#58370 Add better python operators annotations for IDE type checking,module: typing,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: typing blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: typing paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,58370,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: typing bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #58370: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, feature, module: typing, triaged; title: Add better python operators annotations for IDE type checking",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7271dae20f534f1c8f40fd72882b664ec2c5f02c7d3c27cb3f0aa689d2bd8cf8
+BUNDLE-1157,bundle:bundle-1157,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: module: ux (1 issue),issue_group,,#31558 More dynamic PyTorch APIs,module: ux,Open one maintainer code PR for the module: ux blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for module: ux paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,31558,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: ux bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #31558: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, triaged, module: ux; title: More dynamic PyTorch APIs",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e15af8561fa7dce70f7ceab3f6cee7c653c85f532ff7eda7819edeae6b5ede33
+BUNDLE-1158,bundle:bundle-1158,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: oncall: distributed (1 issue),issue_group,,#42793 distributed training with c10d does not work with layerdrop in pytorch > 1.4,oncall: distributed,Open one maintainer code PR for the oncall: distributed blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for oncall: distributed paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,42793,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: distributed bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #42793: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, oncall: distributed, triaged; title: distributed training with c10d does not work with layerdrop in pytorch > 1.4",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",45ec1d66ddeb8d37ce0c38e16c393e218b4abadeb8387d64e7cc66c80500a4b5
+BUNDLE-1159,bundle:bundle-1159,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: oncall: jit (3 issues),issue_group,,oncall: jit high-priority/blocker,oncall: jit,Open one maintainer code PR for the oncall: jit blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for oncall: jit paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"36040, 42487, 61223",,3,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: jit bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #61223: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, oncall: jit, triaged; title: optimize_for_inference does not handle MKLDNN for BatchNorm1d | issue #42487: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, oncall: jit, triaged, weeks; title: Support recursive data type in TorchScript | issue #36040: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, oncall: jit, triaged; title: [JIT] Huge delay (1274s vs 0.031s)...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a73481272dfcc58ad907eef4a0e7558dde6cb60cbe219ea2b97aaedffb00d2ab
+BUNDLE-1160,bundle:bundle-1160,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: oncall: pt2 (2 issues),issue_group,,oncall: pt2 high-priority/blocker,oncall: pt2,Open one maintainer code PR for the oncall: pt2 blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for oncall: pt2 paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"161419, 188332",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: pt2 bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #188332: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, triaged, oncall: pt2; title: Inductor: allgather fusion creates rank-specific cache that crashes when loaded by other ranks | issue #161419: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, triaged, oncall: pt2; title: mobilenetv3_large_100 aot_eager accuracy failure",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2b546f844d1c3a739993f4cf40b65327da8c6b386b33a14a6a95612f80d15a43
+BUNDLE-1161,bundle:bundle-1161,new_code_pr,New maintainer code PR,patch-plan bundle,New maintainer code PR: oncall: quantization (1 issue),issue_group,,#106432 inconsistent dtype of scale and zero_point in observers,oncall: quantization,Open one maintainer code PR for the oncall: quantization blocker/regression cluster with regression tests.,Puts the highest-risk issues into the shortest review path.,Run focused tests for oncall: quantization paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,106432,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: quantization bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #106432: high-priority/blocker; labels: high priority, oncall: quantization, triaged; title: inconsistent dtype of scale and zero_point in observers",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6025843edcb25d446c2dd2ee3b0c254d43309e9e3755bb95679b15bf4b300394
+BUNDLE-1162,bundle:bundle-1162,new_volunteer_pr,New volunteer-ready PR,patch-plan bundle,New volunteer-ready PR: module: __torch_function__ (1 issue),issue_group,,#117806 Supporting custom attributes with `__torch_function__` tensor subclasses,module: __torch_function__,Open one scoped PR or contributor-ready branch for the module: __torch_function__ volunteer slice.,Turns easy/PR-welcome items into one patchable scope with tests instead of scattered asks.,Run focused tests for module: __torch_function__ paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,117806,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: __torch_function__ bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #117806: good volunteer slice; labels: good first issue, triaged, enhancement, module: __torch_function__, module: dynamo; title: Supporting custom attributes with `__torch_function__` tensor subclasses",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",259ebfcc186d685bb50500849bbf5b3cc5158b3853a180c71291003803bf22ac
+BUNDLE-1163,bundle:bundle-1163,new_volunteer_pr,New volunteer-ready PR,patch-plan bundle,New volunteer-ready PR: module: bootcamp (2 issues),issue_group,,module: bootcamp good volunteer slice,module: bootcamp,Open one scoped PR or contributor-ready branch for the module: bootcamp volunteer slice.,Turns easy/PR-welcome items into one patchable scope with tests instead of scattered asks.,Run focused tests for module: bootcamp paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"58122, 79452",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: bootcamp bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #58122: good volunteer slice; labels: module: bootcamp, good first issue, triaged, OSS contribution wanted; title: Generate special clear error messages for known common misuses in TorchScript | issue #79452: good volunteer slice; labels: oncall: distributed, module: bootcamp, good first issue, triaged, better-engineering, pt_distributed_rampup; title: Use c10d broadcast_object in Zero",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",869e0ef701f0ff78c6068f6fc8670cb2e0a7f37a7f14ffee03748594ba2d91fe
+BUNDLE-1164,bundle:bundle-1164,new_volunteer_pr,New volunteer-ready PR,patch-plan bundle,New volunteer-ready PR: module: build (1 issue),issue_group,,#99278 Build error on libstc++ header stl_alogbase.h on riscv,module: build,Open one scoped PR or contributor-ready branch for the module: build volunteer slice.,Turns easy/PR-welcome items into one patchable scope with tests instead of scattered asks.,Run focused tests for module: build paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,99278,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: build bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #99278: good volunteer slice; labels: module: build, good first issue, triaged; title: Build error on libstc++ header stl_alogbase.h on riscv",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1ffbec86be446d749a0d63946bcff0ef023cd959befec8bf1c95abca26a583cd
+BUNDLE-1165,bundle:bundle-1165,new_volunteer_pr,New volunteer-ready PR,patch-plan bundle,New volunteer-ready PR: module: c10d (2 issues),issue_group,,module: c10d good volunteer slice,module: c10d,Open one scoped PR or contributor-ready branch for the module: c10d volunteer slice.,Turns easy/PR-welcome items into one patchable scope with tests instead of scattered asks.,Run focused tests for module: c10d paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"84593, 97469",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: c10d bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #97469: good volunteer slice; labels: good first issue, triaged, module: c10d; title: Improve collectives fingerprinting | issue #84593: good volunteer slice; labels: good first issue, triaged, module: c10d; title: Uneven and/or Dynamically sized collectives",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",fc7dff3a7840c13b8aaf3f092ad073b4eff0cdfe6408531a8212448e3083db3e
+BUNDLE-1166,bundle:bundle-1166,new_volunteer_pr,New volunteer-ready PR,patch-plan bundle,New volunteer-ready PR: module: ci (2 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #64067: Execute C++ based GTest unit tests from a python wrapper,module: ci,Open one scoped PR or contributor-ready branch for the module: ci volunteer slice.,Turns easy/PR-welcome items into one patchable scope with tests instead of scattered asks.,Run focused tests for module: ci paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"64067, 66824",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: ci bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"#65514 introduced a Python framework for running C++ tests(the benefits and reasoning are described in #64067). While that PR added a framework for running tests, we still have many manual calls to C++ test binaries in the scripts used in CI. This i",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",504c386963a86452d9b5274bcf6e9188c48ab9076d834c78e431f54211260b76
+BUNDLE-1167,bundle:bundle-1167,new_volunteer_pr,New volunteer-ready PR,patch-plan bundle,New volunteer-ready PR: module: compile ux (1 issue),issue_group,,#153669 Make tlparse able to show a summary of distinct graph breaks,module: compile ux,Open one scoped PR or contributor-ready branch for the module: compile ux volunteer slice.,Turns easy/PR-welcome items into one patchable scope with tests instead of scattered asks.,Run focused tests for module: compile ux paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,153669,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: compile ux bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #153669: good volunteer slice; labels: good first issue, triaged, oncall: pt2, module: dynamo, dynamo-triage-jan2025, module: compile ux; title: Make tlparse able to show a summary of distinct graph breaks",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3917da7b8c8230e3ef4ea8c34e88d606547b14470052275e2e634cf8f5be7362
+BUNDLE-1168,bundle:bundle-1168,new_volunteer_pr,New volunteer-ready PR,patch-plan bundle,New volunteer-ready PR: module: docs (1 issue),issue_group,,#9886 [doc] functionalities not documented,module: docs,Open one scoped PR or contributor-ready branch for the module: docs volunteer slice.,Turns easy/PR-welcome items into one patchable scope with tests instead of scattered asks.,Run focused tests for module: docs paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,9886,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: docs bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #9886: good volunteer slice; labels: module: docs, good first issue, triaged; title: [doc] functionalities not documented",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9454a146c225ba06ad0bddd0271ca97183109952b7ac4b05927e314b0f3bc55b
+BUNDLE-1169,bundle:bundle-1169,new_volunteer_pr,New volunteer-ready PR,patch-plan bundle,New volunteer-ready PR: module: dynamo (2 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #102207: skipIfTorchInductor Tracking Issue,module: dynamo,Open one scoped PR or contributor-ready branch for the module: dynamo volunteer slice.,Turns easy/PR-welcome items into one patchable scope with tests instead of scattered asks.,Run focused tests for module: dynamo paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"102207, 108798",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: dynamo bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"_.from needs to be renamed"" 'test_advancedindex_mixed_cpu_devices' - ""FIXME"" 'test_advancedindex_mixed_devices_error' - ""FIXME"" #108181 and #108798 'test_typed_storage_deprecation_warning' - ""FIXME"" 'test_pin_memory' - ""pin_memory isn't yet supported in TorchInductor"" 'test_me...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4d8203cbc6dadd1c24c405a9056f835d27a326cecdf1a9aae05be2fc414a3d07
+BUNDLE-1170,bundle:bundle-1170,new_volunteer_pr,New volunteer-ready PR,patch-plan bundle,New volunteer-ready PR: module: internals (3 issues),issue_group,,module: internals good volunteer slice,module: internals,Open one scoped PR or contributor-ready branch for the module: internals volunteer slice.,Turns easy/PR-welcome items into one patchable scope with tests instead of scattered asks.,Run focused tests for module: internals paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"10756, 20704, 61654",,3,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: internals bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #61654: good volunteer slice; labels: module: internals, good first issue, triaged; title: Allow creation of pseudo devices for testing purposes | issue #10756: good volunteer slice; labels: module: internals, good first issue, triaged, module: partial aliasing; title: Unexpected Behavior when Pointwise Operations Write to Expanded Tensors | issue #20704: good volunteer slice; labels: module: internals, modu...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2427912bbdccbfdd670c399b623a2d3a18fccb2ee4d8d97719537020f03c3faa
+BUNDLE-1171,bundle:bundle-1171,new_volunteer_pr,New volunteer-ready PR,patch-plan bundle,New volunteer-ready PR: module: memory format (2 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #40316: Refactor the adaptive avg pool code,module: memory format,Open one scoped PR or contributor-ready branch for the module: memory format volunteer slice.,Turns easy/PR-welcome items into one patchable scope with tests instead of scattered asks.,Run focused tests for module: memory format paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"40316, 42779",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: memory format bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"ng5 @Xia-Weiwen @leslie-fang-intel @dzhulgakov @VitalyFedyunin @ppwwyyxx @ngimel @z-a-f, @vkuzo. 🐛 Bug As part of the refactoring effort in #40316, I ran some benchmarks on adaptive_avg_pool(2/3)d to see what is the difference in execution time for MemoryFormat::Contiguous vs...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",40eea0de8f490a3315d4a897b633c13c5416b2d0545376037f7951fdb417d1e2
+BUNDLE-1172,bundle:bundle-1172,new_volunteer_pr,New volunteer-ready PR,patch-plan bundle,New volunteer-ready PR: module: nn (1 issue),issue_group,,#66813 Use `__slots__` for the `nn.Module` class,module: nn,Open one scoped PR or contributor-ready branch for the module: nn volunteer slice.,Turns easy/PR-welcome items into one patchable scope with tests instead of scattered asks.,Run focused tests for module: nn paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,66813,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: nn bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #66813: good volunteer slice; labels: module: performance, module: nn, good first issue, triaged, better-engineering, actionable; title: Use `__slots__` for the `nn.Module` class",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",74afc6b2a8d1249fcff10dd1966f709815c151a6d00d58eb62d9fd51cd249994
+BUNDLE-1173,bundle:bundle-1173,new_volunteer_pr,New volunteer-ready PR,patch-plan bundle,New volunteer-ready PR: module: numpy (1 issue),issue_group,,#93684 Can we rewrite numpy operators to pytorch operators?,module: numpy,Open one scoped PR or contributor-ready branch for the module: numpy volunteer slice.,Turns easy/PR-welcome items into one patchable scope with tests instead of scattered asks.,Run focused tests for module: numpy paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,93684,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: numpy bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #93684: good volunteer slice; labels: good first issue, triaged, module: numpy; title: Can we rewrite numpy operators to pytorch operators?",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",da9075cd9722a0b875cff11286033496071de45bb28ec677e450fe0d773baa6e
+BUNDLE-1174,bundle:bundle-1174,new_volunteer_pr,New volunteer-ready PR,patch-plan bundle,New volunteer-ready PR: module: random (1 issue),issue_group,,#67321 alias to generate tensor with random uniform distribution.,module: random,Open one scoped PR or contributor-ready branch for the module: random volunteer slice.,Turns easy/PR-welcome items into one patchable scope with tests instead of scattered asks.,Run focused tests for module: random paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,67321,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: random bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #67321: good volunteer slice; labels: feature, good first issue, triaged, module: random; title: alias to generate tensor with random uniform distribution.",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a1691c6d6e09680e10ed6b2d6f68d30adadf5137da6d8a96ea3b78c65d47dbcf
+BUNDLE-1175,bundle:bundle-1175,new_volunteer_pr,New volunteer-ready PR,patch-plan bundle,New volunteer-ready PR: module: scatter & gather ops (1 issue),issue_group,,#63265 torch.scatter_: support index.size(d) > src.size(d),module: scatter & gather ops,Open one scoped PR or contributor-ready branch for the module: scatter & gather ops volunteer slice.,Turns easy/PR-welcome items into one patchable scope with tests instead of scattered asks.,Run focused tests for module: scatter & gather ops paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,63265,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: scatter & gather ops bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #63265: good volunteer slice; labels: good first issue, triaged, enhancement, module: scatter & gather ops; title: torch.scatter_: support index.size(d) > src.size(d)",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6e7fd8e663ac496d48621790fc6d6f75b2ab1a935919f7b181e81021481c71cb
+BUNDLE-1176,bundle:bundle-1176,new_volunteer_pr,New volunteer-ready PR,patch-plan bundle,New volunteer-ready PR: oncall: jit (1 issue),issue_group,,#16663 new_zeros is not traced correctly,oncall: jit,Open one scoped PR or contributor-ready branch for the oncall: jit volunteer slice.,Turns easy/PR-welcome items into one patchable scope with tests instead of scattered asks.,Run focused tests for oncall: jit paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,16663,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: jit bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #16663: good volunteer slice; labels: oncall: jit, good first issue, triaged; title: new_zeros is not traced correctly",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6231ad1e7488c7142605578c0f579291d8fc60193a8e6cb32ebf6d94c58c3f93
+BUNDLE-1177,bundle:bundle-1177,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: general (140 issues),issue_group,,general stale/low urgency batch 9,general,"Run one general stale-resolution sweep covering 140 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"4073, 6552, 6846, 6901, 7047, 7227, 7480, 7493, 7571, 7729, 7781, 7789, 7897, 7945, 7946, 7986, 8012, 8128, 8186, 8328, 8479, 8546, 8548, 8607, 8648, 8650, 8730, 8902, 8979, 8982, 8984, 9003, 9016, 9024, 9028, 9068, 9098, 9150, 9166, 9174, 9207, 9218, 9449, 9761, 9881, 9883, 9921, 9945, 10070, 10088, 10161, 10170, 10176, 10215, 10256, 10314, 10341, 10342, 10396, 10460, 10461, 10515, 10582, 10714, 10738, 10808, 10902, 10984, 10985, 10991, 11119, 11197, 27815, 33298, 33520, 40087, 65140, 68258, 70540, 73665, 77537, 77880, 84193, 92838, 97408, 97504, 97653, 97961, 99025, 99790, 100419, 100617, 100785, 100807, 101191, 101319, 101536, 102360, 102741, 102921, 103241, 103382, 103530, 103802, 104045, 104282, 108888, 110786, 111210, 111806, 112318, 112608, 114044, 117967, 118970, 119377, 119387, 119417, 119418, 120002, 120037, 120104, 120534, 120541, 121737, 122552, 122756, 123120, 123466, 124998, 127555, 128960, 129447, 129625, 130238, 130636, 130792, 131274, 131962, 134201",,140,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a general stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #103382: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged; title: NotImplementedError Could not run 'c10d::alltoall_' with arguments from the 'Meta' backend. | issue #102921: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged; title: Unbox expectedml | issue #102741: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, topic: new features, topic: docs; title: Unlocking PyTorch's Power: README.md in Multiple Languages! | issue #100785: stale/low urgency;...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2e49a98a72ff8bb4bbfc10ee9b250d6be9c92ca4f1ef0e5ba629c52e20d408d9
+BUNDLE-1178,bundle:bundle-1178,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: general (140 issues),issue_group,,general stale/low urgency batch 41,general,"Run one general stale-resolution sweep covering 140 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"6618, 6660, 6868, 7078, 7912, 8471, 8937, 8944, 9407, 9531, 9676, 9704, 9708, 9975, 10675, 10875, 10940, 10990, 11058, 11180, 11267, 11268, 11354, 11363, 11433, 11636, 11678, 11735, 11791, 11850, 11861, 11865, 11885, 11890, 11976, 11996, 12007, 12010, 12045, 12086, 12134, 12136, 12181, 12257, 12280, 12297, 12322, 12501, 12515, 12530, 12576, 12640, 12642, 12646, 12658, 12755, 12763, 12808, 12879, 12913, 12931, 13041, 13120, 13208, 13226, 13297, 13373, 13405, 13493, 13498, 13598, 13655, 13667, 13671, 13684, 13715, 13772, 14030, 14185, 14222, 14262, 14312, 14320, 14328, 14337, 14348, 14366, 14380, 14408, 14431, 14459, 14508, 14538, 14652, 14685, 14726, 14788, 14796, 14799, 14925, 14939, 14940, 14963, 14970, 14989, 15009, 15249, 15290, 15313, 15431, 15432, 15465, 15608, 15771, 15869, 16138, 16195, 16254, 16280, 16385, 16436, 16494, 16590, 16666, 17437, 17632, 17634, 17712, 37443, 50258, 55228, 57117, 57230, 78954, 96265, 129228, 138197, 139520, 140640, 140711",,140,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a general stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,issue #11890: stale/low urgency; labels: caffe2; title: caffe2 argmax and argmin documentation incorrect for output type | issue #11885: stale/low urgency; labels: caffe2; title: [caffe2] Bug for softmaxwithloss operator | issue #9975: stale/low urgency; labels: caffe2; title: python caffe2/python/operator_test/activation_ops_test.py Segmentation fault (core dumped) | issue #11976: stale/low urgency; labels: caffe...,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",affd147e1e10e6fe82b6ccb1201a3794f4280294475f15ab1db16978468c3a35
+BUNDLE-1179,bundle:bundle-1179,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: general (140 issues),issue_group,,general stale/low urgency batch 32,general,"Run one general stale-resolution sweep covering 140 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"2739, 3176, 5266, 6402, 6408, 6613, 6760, 6794, 8028, 8550, 8886, 9029, 9208, 9699, 10232, 11451, 11978, 12401, 12509, 12855, 12869, 13224, 13304, 13664, 13746, 13836, 14131, 14370, 14486, 14487, 14731, 15120, 16299, 16322, 17458, 17495, 17796, 17800, 17850, 17872, 17887, 17907, 17936, 18000, 18011, 18101, 18273, 18677, 18944, 19107, 19244, 19416, 19708, 19930, 19960, 20268, 20273, 20776, 20777, 20975, 21012, 21277, 21684, 21766, 22040, 22358, 22375, 22609, 22859, 23364, 23429, 24079, 24353, 24835, 25112, 25880, 26802, 27034, 27840, 28093, 28249, 28859, 30155, 30405, 30418, 31548, 31606, 32033, 32105, 32783, 32916, 33085, 33180, 33341, 33611, 33653, 33787, 34207, 34715, 35609, 35681, 35755, 35944, 35964, 36436, 36733, 36753, 36754, 37065, 37204, 37434, 37684, 38170, 38640, 39298, 39603, 39665, 39972, 40030, 40269, 41660, 41801, 41823, 41904, 43040, 43486, 93454, 93455, 93456, 93463, 146889, 148044, 148113, 150531, 150861, 153041, 153967, 155703, 157721, 159228",,140,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a general stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,issue #6408: stale/low urgency; labels: caffe2; title: [caffe2] Prefetching blobs for memory optimization | issue #18944: stale/low urgency; labels: caffe2; title: Caffe2 on google colab: | issue #15120: stale/low urgency; labels: caffe2; title: Different implementations of upsampleBilinear between pytorch and caffe2 | issue #16299: stale/low urgency; labels: caffe2; title: caffe2::CudnnConvOp::RunOnDevice() fails...,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a1eb7ddcd54e7f083655af150205c2b2deb69e9b5681f4f2f6d657dc1aa18595
+BUNDLE-1180,bundle:bundle-1180,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: general (140 issues),issue_group,,general stale/low urgency batch 23,general,"Run one general stale-resolution sweep covering 140 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"3823, 6505, 7020, 7546, 7745, 9133, 9375, 10913, 11516, 11537, 12690, 13034, 13508, 14702, 14864, 15378, 16402, 16556, 17538, 22447, 24313, 27336, 28218, 31679, 40034, 41232, 42173, 42597, 42919, 43815, 43964, 44185, 44489, 46400, 46787, 46869, 47954, 48929, 48998, 49166, 51282, 51410, 51451, 52694, 52745, 52767, 53072, 53193, 53386, 53442, 53462, 53463, 53952, 54192, 54340, 54362, 54364, 54366, 54566, 54630, 54757, 54800, 54802, 54897, 55696, 55933, 55941, 56100, 56285, 56357, 56634, 56707, 56809, 57005, 57359, 57380, 57404, 57415, 57495, 57691, 57742, 57987, 58016, 58091, 58167, 58617, 58791, 58930, 59575, 60083, 60102, 60802, 60924, 60991, 60999, 61384, 61843, 62011, 62673, 62699, 62742, 62973, 64124, 64845, 65494, 67377, 67751, 68474, 68475, 68498, 69676, 69893, 69932, 70413, 72448, 74248, 74300, 74485, 74514, 75798, 75925, 75986, 76040, 76047, 76323, 76326, 93464, 93465, 93486, 93488, 93580, 93592, 93596, 93602, 93604, 93609, 99999, 106885, 146945, 153745",,140,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a general stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #42173: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, function request; title: Exclusive flag in torch.cumsum | issue #7546: stale/low urgency; labels: caffe2; title: [Caffe2] Build broken on macOS High Sierra: can't find sys headers in /usr/local/include. | issue #3823: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, enhancement; title: Fuse bias to CuDNN convolution | issue #46869: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, open sourc...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c9ba0dee5efb464242ce173a64cc7e1f8dbb381be0eecb287e85b3e277b8a4b8
+BUNDLE-1181,bundle:bundle-1181,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: general (140 issues),issue_group,,general stale/low urgency batch 14,general,"Run one general stale-resolution sweep covering 140 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"630, 711, 1442, 1641, 1642, 1861, 2569, 5385, 7250, 9417, 9624, 9898, 11612, 12764, 15829, 17268, 20613, 25091, 26109, 32088, 32219, 32452, 33390, 33859, 34086, 37300, 38550, 38684, 38737, 39395, 39820, 41164, 42440, 44255, 45540, 48366, 49076, 49110, 51440, 51456, 52553, 52668, 52673, 53438, 55274, 59386, 64932, 65002, 65950, 68967, 69654, 70529, 72737, 73646, 74539, 74669, 76327, 76331, 76441, 76451, 76656, 77736, 77894, 77899, 77946, 77967, 77981, 78507, 79013, 79030, 79031, 79032, 79050, 79052, 79053, 79118, 79137, 79138, 79336, 79349, 79395, 79407, 79425, 79453, 79469, 79592, 80985, 81932, 81935, 81937, 81938, 81943, 82197, 82357, 82751, 82764, 83024, 83764, 83817, 83851, 84346, 84597, 84691, 84721, 85058, 85082, 85625, 87350, 88880, 90905, 90998, 91624, 91678, 91716, 91759, 92075, 92781, 92811, 92828, 92967, 93444, 93446, 93458, 93579, 93719, 95779, 95917, 109098, 129330, 152134, 156745, 159932, 160122, 164089, 165042, 165992, 169318, 169955, 170674, 171100",,140,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a general stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #79050: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, lazy; title: [MetaIssue] Investigate if we should be reusing primtorch formulas for `is_dynamic` | issue #79031: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, lazy; title: Implement SymbolicIntNode interface for lazy (i.e. lazy::SymbolicIntNode) | issue #79030: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, lazy; title: Devirtualize `sym_sizes`. It still has to work for python tensor s...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1319789ccd61d8e45475098d3b01c191a1b982532be3d3a9803f15f0ae7739b2
+BUNDLE-1182,bundle:bundle-1182,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: general (33 issues),issue_group,,general stale/low urgency batch 47,general,"Run one general stale-resolution sweep covering 33 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"1487, 6273, 6357, 6542, 6783, 6845, 6857, 6875, 6902, 7127, 7133, 7179, 9484, 9604, 9853, 9854, 10007, 10254, 12983, 25381, 31085, 49480, 59682, 61079, 64185, 68287, 68288, 68298, 106713, 106717, 106718, 159229, 159230",,33,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a general stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,issue #7133: stale/low urgency; labels: caffe2; title: [Caffe2 warpctc] How to use the offered warpctc? | issue #7179: stale/low urgency; labels: caffe2; title: [caffe2]when i do CMAKE | issue #6902: stale/low urgency; labels: caffe2; title: [Caffe2] Flatten Layer in caffe2 | issue #6875: stale/low urgency; labels: caffe2; title: [Bug] VS reports unresolved external symbol from caffe2 observer | issue #6845: stale...,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",db2c94af1e14561c5449086e83fa5dd44df27692a0978d57b2b7b1bf12dd5b64
+BUNDLE-1183,bundle:bundle-1183,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: general (2 issues),issue_group,,"Review thread: 2 issues - issue #10119: [Caffe2] MNIST Tutorial LMDB Error ""Cannot open db""",general,"Run one general stale-resolution sweep covering 2 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"7807, 10119",,2,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a general stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"put - none of these combos work. I've seen other posts on this issue such as: facebookarchive/caffe2#1074 facebookarchive/caffe2#2282 #9736 #7807 facebookarchive/tutorials#7 But most of these issues were either older, posted by those who built from source or had different envi...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",62cbe92b789f7f28cab0912eb70d210cb9ba1a3b324c8634345dd192e1489533
+BUNDLE-1184,bundle:bundle-1184,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: 64-bit (18 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #129118: interpolate nearest get values zero when outputs over 4G elements,module: 64-bit,"Run one module: 64-bit stale-resolution sweep covering 18 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"17897, 25747, 31708, 84520, 95024, 117736, 129118, 133751, 137368, 141831, 144824, 147118, 147613, 149301, 154322, 155218, 169163, 188756",,18,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: 64-bit stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"1].abs().sum()) tensor(0., device='cuda:0', dtype=torch.bfloat16) Workaround Make the input tensor contiguous, as in #81665. Related issues #129118 #81665 Additional considerations The fact that the failure is silent makes this hard to identify, track and debug. The CPU implem... | slicing — the device copy is intact; only the gather is broken. All indices involved are valid; this is not the OOB-index case of #154...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d660ddade16561d93add49d96711f516f0757431948fb4a0eb320d2be3ff2725
+BUNDLE-1185,bundle:bundle-1185,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: __torch_dispatch__ (41 issues),issue_group,,module: __torch_dispatch__ stale/low urgency batch 2,module: __torch_dispatch__,"Run one module: __torch_dispatch__ stale-resolution sweep covering 41 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"62888, 64548, 64874, 65339, 65423, 65619, 66026, 68622, 69530, 69991, 72179, 72911, 73150, 73930, 74991, 75166, 76844, 77118, 77223, 77265, 77332, 77544, 78845, 79563, 81240, 81565, 81682, 82239, 82479, 84565, 84864, 85105, 86128, 91437, 108983, 114652, 121917, 124788, 131753, 131772, 163013",,41,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: __torch_dispatch__ stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #81240: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: __torch_dispatch__, module: functionalization; title: Functionalization and fake tensors failure in torture test | issue #74991: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, better-engineering, module: __torch_dispatch__, tensor subclass; title: Tensor Subclass not preserved for Tensor subclasses created via inheritance of a TensorImpl subclass | issue #79563: stale...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",77479a1fc177bd3f3add6f2bdb348c65721efa234b1e21f02184a1cb131db2c1
+BUNDLE-1186,bundle:bundle-1186,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: __torch_function__ (34 issues),issue_group,,module: __torch_function__ stale/low urgency batch 2,module: __torch_function__,"Run one module: __torch_function__ stale-resolution sweep covering 34 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"44316, 45565, 53678, 53937, 55095, 55104, 55440, 61544, 63911, 64187, 64690, 65215, 65753, 73860, 74491, 75462, 75554, 75568, 76037, 76294, 76734, 76751, 77668, 81323, 92701, 93362, 105644, 106302, 110249, 119194, 122814, 123245, 131947, 135660",,34,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: __torch_function__ stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #76734: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: __torch_function__; title: __torch_function__ callers should always pass kwargs | issue #76294: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: vmap, module: __torch_function__; title: torch._remove_batch_dim is interceptable by __torch_function__ / batch tensors don't print correctly | issue #76037: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: __torch_function_...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2bd8566516cf4b431ba94bd83862feb1d2fa5a3752677456530a7d16ebbc5622
+BUNDLE-1187,bundle:bundle-1187,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: abi (23 issues),issue_group,,"Review thread: 2 issues - issue #47993: build pytorch from source on ubuntu, building error from fbgemm::SparseAdaGradSignature",module: abi,"Run one module: abi stale-resolution sweep covering 23 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"2575, 17658, 28754, 41797, 47993, 51039, 51781, 55267, 60341, 61260, 62650, 64645, 68905, 69013, 70191, 73829, 77184, 81680, 102142, 102272, 109923, 163290, 166101",,23,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: abi stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"port torch; print(torch._C._GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI)""` with the conda version also yields `False` I tried compiling from source but am facing #47993. Any feedback or tips would be appreciated. | ssages sent to stderr or stdout. Yet, I'm speculating if this crash might be hiding a Thread-Local Storage (TLS) issue, as documented here: #2575. SEGFAULT BT: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x00007fffc...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",15b5bedf4bcf10b8a43b2f3159bd46422c463e1cd570c9383f425e371de62232
+BUNDLE-1188,bundle:bundle-1188,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: accelerator (9 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 3 issues - issue #143112: FFT half precision only let CUDA pass the check,module: accelerator,"Run one module: accelerator stale-resolution sweep covering 9 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"143112, 150663, 165038, 166054, 166696, 167210, 167447, 169277, 169371",,9,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: accelerator stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"torch.accelerator.get_device_capability for users to get some device capabilities (currently focus on data types) to solve some issues like #165038 and #143112. The supported data types in PyTorch are: float32, float64, float16, bfloat16, float8_e5m2, float8_e4m3fn, float8_e5m... | rator.get_device_capability for users to get some device capabilities (currently focus on data types) to solve some issues like #16503...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9aa594a9953ee042c37c256262eec25e6a6d1f1f25b723e68a44cf049a0dea0b
+BUNDLE-1189,bundle:bundle-1189,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: activation checkpointing (42 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 7 issues - issue #12659: Differentiation through Module parameters updates,module: activation checkpointing,"Run one module: activation checkpointing stale-resolution sweep covering 42 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"7313, 7617, 7801, 12659, 13234, 23732, 24005, 32005, 39279, 42812, 45242, 46886, 65913, 68423, 71322, 79016, 82156, 82465, 86097, 90481, 98668, 102600, 125591, 129293, 130096, 131062, 143176, 143774, 144470, 144928, 145511, 146707, 147449, 151936, 152752, 153334, 154984, 155171, 155490, 165880, 166646, 170284",,42,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: activation checkpointing stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"Hi, Thanks for sharing these details. We are indeed looking into providing these functionalities (via different APIs). You can see #39279 and #49171 for example. These two would provide similar functionality as what you're looking for right? | Yup, #7313 :) But maybe even regardless, having supported convenience methods for removing buffers / parameters / etc can be useful. | I don't think this fits well with how...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f3fa8669910012f84144d7630c152ac8186d7ae3d2d46cbc0c46ff9153ee0909
+BUNDLE-1190,bundle:bundle-1190,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: advanced indexing (44 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 5 issues - issue #105641: Turn indexing with a scalar tensor into an copy into a view and avoid a D2H synchronization.,module: advanced indexing,"Run one module: advanced indexing stale-resolution sweep covering 44 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"11635, 15284, 30574, 31913, 45125, 50737, 52743, 53257, 54062, 55143, 56896, 58181, 59140, 61819, 63921, 63935, 71331, 73175, 73501, 74952, 76347, 79997, 81413, 82926, 86890, 96111, 99297, 103580, 105641, 107700, 108968, 111159, 119548, 121719, 128396, 130525, 135487, 136736, 147628, 150017, 161970, 162918, 167825, 170350",,44,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: advanced indexing stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"@Chillee maybe also that's why part of why repeat_interleave is slow: #31980, also a bit related: #73175 | tensor([2, 3, 5]) out = torch.repeat_interleave(A, num_repeats.cuda(), dim=0) Indexing with a scalar tensor performs a synchronization. See #105641 for more details. torch.normal also incurs a sync on std: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/blob/main/aten/src/ATen/native/Distr... | ates.h#L222 nanmedian incur...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a0ccbce54899fa6ce1af80729acc0eb2073ccf78423167e88162697e9abc71e8
+BUNDLE-1191,bundle:bundle-1191,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: amp (automated mixed precision) (86 issues),issue_group,,"Review thread: 5 issues - issue #44511: LR scheduler throws warning when using scaler.step instead of optimizer.step, and when saving optimizer state",module: amp (automated mixed precision),"Run one module: amp (automated mixed precision) stale-resolution sweep covering 86 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"38487, 38788, 40427, 40497, 42311, 42460, 42838, 43544, 43556, 44511, 44710, 44724, 45412, 45910, 46178, 47906, 49038, 49282, 49653, 52279, 53094, 53345, 55374, 55585, 56979, 60164, 60724, 61173, 63078, 63313, 65760, 65788, 67589, 67590, 67598, 67879, 68315, 70166, 70346, 71631, 72295, 72421, 72897, 73050, 73924, 74739, 76282, 80167, 81876, 82076, 82212, 83733, 86270, 86548, 87979, 88474, 89241, 90057, 92542, 93227, 98814, 98860, 99710, 100705, 100932, 105682, 107663, 108627, 110966, 111739, 115500, 117832, 119473, 120930, 120994, 129027, 130067, 130847, 132388, 132602, 137080, 160415, 160438, 161621, 165324, 165730",,86,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: amp (automated mixed precision) stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,error-using-gradscaler/92930/8. IMO this is an ugly solution that relies on the details of the scaler values. Additional context Also fixes #55585 The warning UserWarning: Detected call of lr_scheduler.step() before optimizer.step() is impacting Lightning (Lightning-AI/pytorch... | sure if any other optimizer wrapper may need to run certain communications even if no local optimizer step. One relevant feature reque...,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",aae0d85edf95e97ad5e0540defbf5b1beba454eacfde0546bf94c6915113f04e
+BUNDLE-1192,bundle:bundle-1192,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: android (23 issues),issue_group,,module: android stale/low urgency batch 1,module: android,"Run one module: android stale-resolution sweep covering 23 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"32919, 34799, 45560, 50723, 51020, 52495, 55296, 55297, 58171, 58172, 58393, 58548, 63082, 63305, 64311, 66284, 74155, 78261, 83947, 101972, 107627, 125837, 140090",,23,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: android stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #63305: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, enhancement, module: android, oncall: mobile; title: Alternate Model Loading - Android | issue #58393: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: android, oncall: mobile; title: In Android, the memory used by the tensor or model cannot be recycled. Is there any way to solve it? | issue #51020: stale/low urgency; labels: module: build, triaged, module: android, mod...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",78879628b31d631399b6492d60e5e2c7056c1e39df19070f182b49ecb71b5966
+BUNDLE-1193,bundle:bundle-1193,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: aotdispatch (21 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 10 issues - issue #103475: [Inductor] Optimize More Cases of Int32 -> Int64,module: aotdispatch,"Run one module: aotdispatch stale-resolution sweep covering 21 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"25104, 26889, 40373, 43501, 44026, 46948, 54982, 68204, 76580, 92927, 103475, 106596, 110175, 111950, 146693, 148146, 151884, 154083, 158643, 158970, 163048",,21,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: aotdispatch stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,Related RFC: #54982 (comment) | less_than(torch.uint32) (this latter can be even more expressive for shorter dtypes assert tensor.is_numel_less_than(torch.uint8)) Related: #46948 | I think it might be best to merge this and your comments into #26889. Part of the problem could be that you get funny things with dynamic patterns (eg padding in conv). | The related issue is #46948 on using assert statements to give sh...,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f07c3f14e87c4603a7b5d56fc2def8c956b238125f1966e3790b81816a0db08c
+BUNDLE-1194,bundle:bundle-1194,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: aotinductor (17 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #159124: AOTInductor preallocate output tensors,module: aotinductor,"Run one module: aotinductor stale-resolution sweep covering 17 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"127928, 147475, 150364, 159124, 161108, 163624, 165444, 168563, 168566, 168567, 168568, 168706, 168707, 168708, 168709, 169154, 169469",,17,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: aotinductor stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"all, I'd like to double check whether updating buffers inplace is currently supported with AOTInductor? Based on the answers on this issue #159124 I think it should be, but it does not seem to work when I load the module from file. If not, is there any workaround we can use at... | uctor.py Test class: AOTInductorTestsTemplate Test name: test_autotune_int64_user_defined_triton_kernel Defined at line: 5861 Parent i...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5ce62525c8014f5e77af7c7776b8c37ff9a71cd2b43870a81f2943878d15d579
+BUNDLE-1195,bundle:bundle-1195,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: arm (68 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 3 issues - issue #64812: PyTorch inference on tensors of a particular size cause Illegal Instruction (core dumped) on Jetson Nano,module: arm,"Run one module: arm stale-resolution sweep covering 68 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"13130, 22550, 39680, 42439, 46522, 47476, 50471, 50650, 51535, 52206, 52478, 54104, 56333, 59243, 59262, 59356, 59437, 59439, 59936, 60834, 61110, 63558, 64812, 65673, 66410, 68349, 68701, 70350, 73051, 74503, 76689, 79421, 81317, 86076, 86676, 86989, 87159, 88968, 89336, 90536, 91182, 91368, 93197, 97188, 99544, 104502, 105335, 107693, 110737, 120897, 123835, 126980, 128414, 130524, 132132, 132412, 134117, 139210, 143571, 144633, 145716, 148078, 153471, 157139, 158041, 166512, 169294, 173225",,68,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: arm stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"python3 -c ""import torch;print(torch.mm(torch.zeros((1,1024)), torch.zeros((1024,1024))))"" ... run ... bt ... disasm Likely a duplicate of #64812 a should be fixable by building OpenBLAS with a dynamic backend | ing the pytorch api at runtime using https://github.com/xloem/mempickle/blob/master/patch_pytorch.py . This approach may work to workaround #64812 and #68349 which are likely the same issue. | orch api at...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b53497ecf57e4d13034da8d37180b9e1f812d4b2bcaf8ac75ac532de2c082068
+BUNDLE-1196,bundle:bundle-1196,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: assert failure (18 issues),issue_group,,module: assert failure stale/low urgency batch 1,module: assert failure,"Run one module: assert failure stale-resolution sweep covering 18 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"5857, 16589, 16695, 22122, 29026, 32036, 32227, 51855, 59743, 70388, 84510, 86644, 89275, 92594, 94304, 96789, 122467, 130073",,18,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: assert failure stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #130073: stale/low urgency; labels: module: ci, triaged, module: assert failure, module: dynamic shapes; title: ☂️ TORCH_INTERNAL_ASSERT failures while running CI | issue #22122: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: assert failure; title: ASSERT FAILED at /pytorch/torch/csrc/autograd/generated/VariableType_0.cpp:12721 | issue #122467: stale/low urgency; labels: module: sparse, module: multiprocessing,...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",df0865549b05e7feee4cb7703553acbaf21c03c31ba24cedcdfc3607c84b3931
+BUNDLE-1197,bundle:bundle-1197,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: autograd (82 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #25888: Forward/backward hooks for C++ torch::nn modules,module: autograd,"Run one module: autograd stale-resolution sweep covering 82 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"3625, 18173, 25883, 25888, 28440, 30458, 33227, 34329, 44027, 49825, 56500, 63623, 66357, 67463, 68208, 68331, 69714, 70870, 71698, 72041, 72055, 72061, 72831, 73137, 74222, 74299, 74604, 74677, 76522, 76585, 76780, 76783, 76786, 77515, 77552, 77963, 78151, 78346, 78482, 78624, 79705, 80061, 80204, 80206, 80762, 80803, 80804, 81417, 81448, 82145, 82545, 83537, 85485, 86271, 86444, 87755, 87956, 88691, 89574, 90065, 91996, 94111, 94451, 94990, 95132, 96187, 96305, 96769, 96908, 97827, 98004, 98498, 99147, 99806, 101069, 102556, 103518, 104040, 105220, 117826, 126164, 177116",,82,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: autograd stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,") tensor(12) Eager result tensor(42) Script result tensor(2) Hooks are also currently not supported in the PyTorch C++ API for nn::Modules (#25888). The the TorchScript C++ API script::Module methods can only be run by fetching them explicitly, e.g. my_module.forward(the_input... | shaders, fixed for torch.mm/torch.bmm via tiling in PR #117549 but not all code paths), #122045 (F.linear wrong results for large inpu...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",02006ccb7e5139a7b6d31e81a76ca72c8c4124636dcbc8eaffbe05297adede5f
+BUNDLE-1198,bundle:bundle-1198,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: autograd (140 issues),issue_group,,module: autograd stale/low urgency batch 4,module: autograd,"Run one module: autograd stale-resolution sweep covering 140 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"2512, 2691, 3818, 4501, 4564, 4731, 4952, 5159, 7343, 7786, 8874, 9282, 9701, 12248, 13818, 18643, 22035, 22778, 23032, 25814, 25941, 26379, 27579, 27641, 27642, 28549, 28925, 29378, 29734, 31185, 31579, 32531, 32576, 32884, 33373, 33628, 33855, 34082, 34367, 34998, 35128, 35797, 37354, 37751, 37860, 38057, 40480, 40736, 41926, 42156, 43347, 45308, 45459, 46643, 46820, 46918, 47028, 47502, 47824, 47901, 48227, 49409, 49673, 49724, 50219, 50613, 51117, 52390, 52762, 53407, 53649, 53666, 54216, 54375, 54591, 55557, 55609, 56177, 56370, 57157, 57502, 57503, 57507, 58037, 58442, 58479, 59493, 59896, 60159, 60426, 60796, 61222, 61410, 61485, 61513, 61619, 61645, 62934, 63205, 63624, 63644, 67240, 68429, 80411, 80827, 83510, 87559, 92331, 94397, 95711, 99556, 101407, 104933, 105846, 106265, 115785, 116320, 118883, 121842, 123996, 127541, 128020, 128064, 128600, 128703, 128971, 134069, 134612, 134901, 135229, 135447, 140516, 141845, 144639, 145356, 146036, 149315, 154332, 159667, 162907",,140,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: autograd stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #123996: stale/low urgency; labels: module: autograd, triaged, module: functorch; title: MSE loss triggers ZeroTensor immutable error inside `torch.func` | issue #121842: stale/low urgency; labels: module: autograd, triaged, actionable; title: gradcheck fails when inputs are dependent on each other | issue #87559: stale/low urgency; labels: module: autograd, triaged, enhancement; title: diagonal of Jacobian...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",604b0d147e320a6f53af2f688c87caf80974b324c8f2a803cda1d9525af6fe15
+BUNDLE-1199,bundle:bundle-1199,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: autograd (67 issues),issue_group,,module: autograd stale/low urgency batch 11,module: autograd,"Run one module: autograd stale-resolution sweep covering 67 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"11390, 23938, 30987, 35041, 35736, 41186, 41400, 52052, 54346, 56202, 56235, 56275, 57447, 57617, 59137, 62032, 62473, 62654, 62849, 64306, 64407, 64931, 65151, 65536, 65683, 66066, 66199, 66875, 67187, 67387, 67493, 67594, 67653, 67772, 68046, 68966, 69531, 69532, 69610, 69687, 70342, 72345, 72347, 72358, 72359, 72361, 72362, 75432, 75586, 76785, 77230, 79039, 83773, 95434, 117394, 117582, 120814, 125984, 133230, 138217, 140520, 154226, 164331, 164759, 166131, 167254, 169055",,67,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: autograd stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #65683: stale/low urgency; labels: module: autograd, module: nn, triaged, module: complex; title: `torch.nn.functional.l1_loss` fails gradgradcheck for complex inputs | issue #65536: stale/low urgency; labels: module: autograd, triaged; title: Pass backward flags such as retain_graph to context of custom torch.autograd.Function | issue #35736: stale/low urgency; labels: module: cpp, module: autograd, triaged...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",29f7ea06f93255e40d93347e92107e2bd8ae844da695ac2868c954a949b55a99
+BUNDLE-1200,bundle:bundle-1200,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: autograd (15 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #59855: pytorch test failed,module: autograd,"Run one module: autograd stale-resolution sweep covering 15 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"20272, 35749, 40208, 41530, 52648, 52717, 53903, 59855, 63295, 100626, 106455, 106951, 110758, 128641, 129272",,15,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: autograd stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"() File ""test/run_test.py"", line 905, in main raise RuntimeError(err_message) RuntimeError: test_autograd failed! Some of it is the same as #59855, but there seem to be more failures this time. cc @malfet @seemethere @walterddr @ezyang @albanD @zou3519 @gqchen @pearu @nikitave... | This is much like issue #52648, but for torch.norm, not torch.linalg.vector_norm. However, torch.norm does not have the workaround tha...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",83dd8912fcdd91e22de753dd8223739a97ff1a4a8de17eb2ad2b90cd2a0901f2
+BUNDLE-1201,bundle:bundle-1201,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: backend (23 issues),issue_group,,module: backend stale/low urgency batch 1,module: backend,"Run one module: backend stale-resolution sweep covering 23 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"7944, 26691, 47546, 54546, 54646, 55879, 55884, 63477, 83657, 91737, 93347, 95207, 98070, 98073, 98406, 98924, 100914, 112691, 113369, 116255, 123072, 151303, 165811",,23,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: backend stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #165811: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: backend, module: python frontend; title: [RFC] A Python backend registration API | issue #151303: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: backend, module: PrivateUse1; title: [Feature Request] Experimental support to Moore Threads GPU MUSA | issue #55879: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: backend, module: vulkan; title: Vulkan backend on desk...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",508de4296834bdc1927b956e98801ac907b66d194953853ed719b4f9c5dbd569
+BUNDLE-1202,bundle:bundle-1202,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: batching (19 issues),issue_group,,module: batching stale/low urgency,module: batching,"Run one module: batching stale-resolution sweep covering 19 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"10172, 15253, 16432, 17774, 21688, 21856, 22169, 33035, 40375, 40441, 47149, 54147, 54743, 58128, 60234, 62171, 75909, 101564, 146697",,19,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: batching stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #40375: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, enhancement, module: batching, function request; title: Add batched torch.combinations | issue #146697: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: batching, module: vmap, module: functorch; title: There is a performance drop because we have not yet implemented the batching rule for aten::mse_loss_backward. | issue #54147: stale/low urgency; labels: feature, module...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5ce6fff1a20954ff2996d2dbef4875dfdc2e399a164567613c135627b59fca0c
+BUNDLE-1203,bundle:bundle-1203,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: bazel (16 issues),issue_group,,module: bazel stale/low urgency,module: bazel,"Run one module: bazel stale-resolution sweep covering 16 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"46631, 63972, 66565, 72880, 79351, 79355, 79851, 79853, 81167, 86194, 91751, 101314, 101470, 117350, 119279, 121207",,16,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: bazel stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #119279: stale/low urgency; labels: module: build, triaged, module: bazel; title: MODULE.bazel support | issue #101470: stale/low urgency; labels: module: build, triaged, module: bazel; title: [bazel] add inductor to bazel build | issue #79851: stale/low urgency; labels: module: cuda, triaged, module: bazel; title: [bazel] [ci] `//:module_test` CUDA error: CUDA driver version is insufficient for CUDA runtime...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ea2cddc7e262fa445ee4302ab436bb5c8f6ba28d9b01baaac4576147c59ba97d
+BUNDLE-1204,bundle:bundle-1204,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: bc-breaking (31 issues),issue_group,,module: bc-breaking stale/low urgency batch 1,module: bc-breaking,"Run one module: bc-breaking stale-resolution sweep covering 31 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"3697, 8104, 10683, 12962, 22707, 30263, 31776, 33122, 38205, 39310, 41027, 46291, 49726, 50292, 50530, 61574, 68464, 72317, 79195, 88144, 88464, 95116, 108108, 109781, 110681, 110702, 129657, 135359, 141139, 151110, 157764",,31,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: bc-breaking stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #151110: stale/low urgency; labels: module: numerical-stability, module: bc-breaking, triaged; title: Update epsilon logic to improve numerical stability | issue #157764: stale/low urgency; labels: module: bc-breaking, triaged, module: mkldnn, module: intel; title: Drop SSE4 support in oneDNN | issue #141139: stale/low urgency; labels: module: bc-breaking, triaged, topic: improvements; title: Consider noting...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",74ef6b25975cf490f93bf5b42973f8b4a52706bf8f4bf3230ea07c72744e2227
+BUNDLE-1205,bundle:bundle-1205,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: benchmark (12 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #112883: Torchbench inference failures,module: benchmark,"Run one module: benchmark stale-resolution sweep covering 12 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"63971, 66992, 77801, 106801, 112883, 113063, 113854, 134079, 149209, 153826, 159676, 159680",,12,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: benchmark stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"s timm_efficientdet - at least locally, OOMs, needs to lower batch size - @eellison cudagraphs dynamic Deferring the dynamic failures until #113063 hf_BigBird Not all values of RelaxedUnspecConstraint(L['inputs'][0].size()[0]) are valid because L['inputs'][0].size()[0] was inf... | issue #159680: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: benchmark; title: [Benchmark Dashboard] Kernel-level benchmark | issue #159...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7a8bcad18c6fca5e5ff3bbb7e3f2a272ba6e1930d53a7b9b3f79fced981fb24a
+BUNDLE-1206,bundle:bundle-1206,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: bfloat16 (42 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #144040: Torch.sparse.mm failing gradient computation at half precision.,module: bfloat16,"Run one module: bfloat16 stale-resolution sweep covering 42 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"15607, 22669, 26136, 28845, 49666, 52310, 54622, 54841, 57773, 62016, 67682, 67979, 75427, 75667, 80574, 88136, 94333, 101781, 106469, 106485, 112575, 116120, 117961, 120463, 121389, 136186, 140222, 140252, 140348, 140892, 144040, 146817, 147134, 151934, 154086, 154351, 157808, 163425, 163574, 164666, 166853, 172085",,42,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: bfloat16 stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"ed"" kernel, resulting in NotImplementedError: ""sampled_addmm_out_sparse_csr"" not implemented for 'BFloat16'. Here's a related issue I found #144040. I could try my hand at fixing this issue, but I need guidance on which approach to take. import torch # @ device = torch.device(... | issue #116120: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: bfloat16; title: bfloat16 on 'grid_sampler_3d_cuda' not implemented | issue...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ff2f39a0314a529412b4a594013e5c3862421a98a6a25cf0b435dd5a1c7f6454
+BUNDLE-1207,bundle:bundle-1207,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: binaries (129 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 3 issues - issue #145949: [CUDA][Blackwell] Blackwell Tracking Issue,module: binaries,"Run one module: binaries stale-resolution sweep covering 129 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"8276, 17835, 20963, 24205, 27752, 28863, 31697, 32419, 32972, 34064, 36062, 37332, 37588, 38412, 38624, 43140, 43758, 43760, 47109, 47291, 47739, 47751, 47916, 48485, 49405, 49406, 49445, 52134, 54332, 55120, 55454, 55611, 56901, 56926, 59263, 60288, 61516, 63555, 63849, 66359, 68055, 69072, 69202, 69505, 70199, 70394, 70513, 71022, 71364, 71473, 73034, 75158, 77052, 79359, 79606, 80857, 80874, 81172, 83064, 85098, 85390, 86965, 87267, 89417, 91334, 92273, 92292, 92907, 93884, 95225, 96595, 96608, 98115, 98361, 98863, 99637, 99781, 100366, 103578, 103959, 106382, 108244, 109112, 110074, 110250, 110819, 112872, 113621, 113941, 114948, 114949, 115077, 115138, 116576, 118173, 119072, 119447, 120291, 120319, 121090, 121308, 121668, 122571, 123075, 124047, 124566, 125502, 125862, 126005, 126286, 128033, 129336, 129555, 130128, 132617, 134236, 137412, 139005, 141094, 141337, 141467, 141977, 143434, 145949, 147692, 152426, 155203, 156024, 165727",,129,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: binaries stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"#145949 | may be related to how DDP handles tied/shared parameters on Blackwell architecture Novel bug - No documented cases found in PyTorch issues #145949 (Blackwell tracking) or #157549 (Blackwell compatibility) Frameworks tested (ALL exhibit same hang): torchrun with native DDP Hugg... | issue #66359: stale/low urgency; labels: module: binaries, module: cuda, triaged, module: lts; title: question on installing...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",16dc040dfadeed3796200dc581c17ea03c7ab3089ca7449124426002d23e8c55
+BUNDLE-1208,bundle:bundle-1208,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: binaries (38 issues),issue_group,,module: binaries stale/low urgency batch 1,module: binaries,"Run one module: binaries stale-resolution sweep covering 38 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"3990, 8098, 23094, 25548, 29057, 29722, 30532, 30903, 31007, 31907, 38310, 50503, 61411, 73008, 76557, 78681, 79337, 97990, 131312, 133823, 138460, 139761, 141014, 142703, 143913, 147274, 150399, 155325, 156694, 156810, 157548, 159947, 162971, 164122, 165902, 166233, 167979, 177082",,38,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: binaries stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #177082: stale/low urgency; labels: module: binaries, module: build, low priority, triaged, actionable, bot-triaged; title: Stable Linux binaries of LibTorch have broken soname and versioning in libgomp | issue #147274: stale/low urgency; labels: module: binaries, module: windows, triaged; title: PaddleOCR PyTorch conflicts | issue #76557: stale/low urgency; labels: module: binaries, triaged; title: Pip pack...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4a8d24fa414685b13301967c3bcd51c0ba03b8e6657deeb0c7c40a3ae55b2b31
+BUNDLE-1209,bundle:bundle-1209,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: binaries (2 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #11982: [feature request] Publish wheels with debug symbols,module: binaries,"Run one module: binaries stale-resolution sweep covering 2 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"11982, 56397",,2,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: binaries stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"ches the correct debug information from pytorch.org, then installs it so gdb will transparently symbolicate crashes. This will also address #11982 Alternatives Do nothing, keep repro-ing issues manually and being sad.",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",fd260c783702acd716268a0d6e6ade9af4513ea96e88f69e52b101228b5b9ca9
+BUNDLE-1210,bundle:bundle-1210,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: boolean tensor (19 issues),issue_group,,module: boolean tensor stale/low urgency batch 1,module: boolean tensor,"Run one module: boolean tensor stale-resolution sweep covering 19 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"25480, 32210, 41323, 44969, 48353, 52265, 62147, 63023, 64041, 67684, 77962, 106579, 106662, 107041, 111925, 117246, 117249, 136578, 139609",,19,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: boolean tensor stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #77962: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: numpy, module: type promotion, module: boolean tensor; title: Operating on boolean torch tensor and numpy array casts to `unit8` | issue #107041: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: boolean tensor; title: I want to calculate the matrix multiplication of two Boolean matrices, but torch.mm will report an error. Is there any more efficient alternative?...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3b29b572891f128c969f7f71965d26cb5c67a26cfef20cc1fa010069f17256eb
+BUNDLE-1211,bundle:bundle-1211,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: bootcamp (145 issues),issue_group,,"Review thread: 39 issues - issue #100249: [discussion] ""TensorList"" as first-class python-world abstraction (to mirror existing dispatcher's `TensorList` and `torch::autograd::tensor_list`) and as key for dispatch for merging `torch._foreach_*` into regular `torch.*` functions",module: bootcamp,"Run one module: bootcamp stale-resolution sweep covering 145 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"1512, 1736, 4959, 8374, 10375, 11936, 12672, 14095, 15821, 15822, 18229, 22924, 23299, 24273, 24422, 24836, 24915, 24985, 25162, 25522, 25641, 25691, 25743, 26957, 27522, 27617, 28743, 30443, 31107, 31422, 31467, 31758, 32497, 32851, 33181, 33296, 35642, 35759, 36650, 37010, 37782, 38228, 38233, 38419, 38437, 38548, 39570, 40456, 40550, 40790, 41292, 42405, 43012, 43253, 43502, 44341, 44898, 45760, 46076, 46176, 46321, 48605, 48845, 49178, 49539, 52583, 52940, 54899, 54941, 54942, 54943, 55005, 55191, 55198, 56191, 56482, 58015, 58139, 60431, 61122, 61835, 62141, 62540, 62554, 62655, 62790, 62917, 63291, 64492, 64744, 64745, 65156, 69519, 70533, 71806, 71810, 71812, 71813, 71814, 71815, 71816, 71817, 71818, 71819, 71820, 71821, 71822, 71823, 71824, 71825, 71826, 71828, 71830, 71831, 71832, 71833, 71834, 71835, 71836, 71837, 71838, 71839, 71840, 71841, 71842, 71843, 72257, 72556, 72558, 73517, 75926, 83775, 85157, 87514, 91471, 91508, 96085, 99719, 100249, 105325, 126714, 134570, 140596, 150989, 151579",,145,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: bootcamp stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,Related #33296 | A bit related (on fusing stack and padding - potentially with multiple): #65156 (comment) #27617 | @cpuhrsch some more nested tensor discussions (also of tensorlist): #65156 #27522 | regular sum also seems not very nice in terms of computational complexity (unless JIT can optimize it). A related feature request: #27522 | for an image. I tried a few approaches which each had some limitations: suppo...,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f734eae768a5fd4005417b60006813eeed200398eac211ee3206e6f458c3ee7a
+BUNDLE-1212,bundle:bundle-1212,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: bootcamp (10 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #46559: Exception raised in rpc_async context is silently handled,module: bootcamp,"Run one module: bootcamp stale-resolution sweep covering 10 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"3667, 4392, 17425, 19120, 27647, 28733, 34675, 40107, 46559, 46653",,10,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: bootcamp stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"#46559 mentioned that it's hard to debug async RPC, as the error is only thrown when users call Future.wait() but users might miss that. @lw sugge | it's very important to not accidentally state-dependence (which will lead to hard to debug performance regressions and problems.) Related: #3667 cc @csarofeen @ptrblck | Issue description @soumith, @VitalyFedyunin, @karimhasebou, I was investigating slow maxpool2d on...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5e8b8c803f98806475bd2ca581416421b6e749ce3491ed8f656d4ef35a1e4745
+BUNDLE-1213,bundle:bundle-1213,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: build (116 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #81541: [vulkan]compiling VulkanOpContext.cpp with some errors,module: build,"Run one module: build stale-resolution sweep covering 116 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"10684, 14277, 15167, 16710, 21318, 21738, 21818, 22495, 22682, 22868, 23512, 23676, 23768, 23896, 24167, 24417, 24419, 24456, 24500, 24798, 24831, 25460, 26058, 26258, 26340, 26409, 26796, 26863, 26964, 26967, 27015, 36437, 41119, 42791, 51151, 55865, 58267, 61244, 65313, 68923, 72582, 75184, 76082, 77939, 81541, 81856, 82072, 82627, 91566, 102936, 103150, 103805, 105728, 106971, 112089, 112942, 113948, 114175, 114388, 115020, 115257, 115672, 116012, 116416, 116478, 117099, 119557, 119740, 120000, 121215, 122027, 122187, 122592, 123091, 124270, 124383, 125134, 125243, 125539, 126211, 126394, 127388, 128314, 129310, 130863, 132013, 132599, 132600, 134399, 134439, 134576, 134682, 135437, 135604, 136201, 137261, 139170, 139290, 139874, 139958, 139962, 140088, 143109, 144328, 144495, 146982, 148518, 148546, 149796, 149803, 149845, 150571, 150718, 150873, 151592, 153361",,116,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: build stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"Identified a possible fix in #82072 | This relates to #82627 (comment) | issue #116478: stale/low urgency; labels: module: build, module: cpp, triaged; title: The Python module installs cmake files and headers under the Python's site-packages directory that can't be used | issue #122027: stale/low urgency; labels: module: build, module: cuda, triaged, module: mkl; title: PyTorch fails to build with mkl if cmake is...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",15d0e65acf8013bb574d4e6595c8d7e8e3d4031ec5c0bdefa4ec7ffcb51b085f
+BUNDLE-1214,bundle:bundle-1214,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: build (140 issues),issue_group,,module: build stale/low urgency batch 35,module: build,"Run one module: build stale-resolution sweep covering 140 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"4758, 5900, 5924, 6071, 6328, 7214, 7352, 7353, 8097, 8107, 8561, 8871, 12535, 14200, 14699, 15291, 15294, 16405, 17666, 17920, 21794, 23730, 25004, 25714, 27409, 28515, 28655, 28745, 28756, 28780, 29235, 30463, 30744, 31264, 31300, 31487, 31598, 31883, 31916, 32113, 32214, 32403, 32416, 32687, 33049, 33129, 33668, 33890, 34409, 34451, 34621, 35035, 35097, 35234, 35414, 35832, 35942, 36125, 36356, 36378, 36407, 36570, 36572, 36713, 36792, 36804, 37282, 37510, 37629, 38204, 38212, 38239, 38354, 38719, 38765, 38854, 38855, 39064, 39101, 39305, 39990, 40563, 40854, 40968, 41135, 41178, 41673, 41816, 41915, 41916, 41918, 41920, 41921, 41938, 41999, 42362, 42526, 42807, 42916, 43030, 43113, 43604, 44362, 44948, 45129, 45444, 45493, 45573, 46035, 46139, 46241, 46367, 46644, 46659, 46766, 46807, 47557, 47681, 48033, 48064, 48291, 48457, 49677, 49784, 49865, 50136, 50830, 51511, 88802, 135126, 139108, 144767, 146221, 150328, 153606, 154096, 155350, 156725, 157465, 159156",,140,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: build stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #31300: stale/low urgency; labels: module: build, triaged, module: mkldnn; title: torch runtime error when manual link libmkldnn.so | issue #27409: stale/low urgency; labels: module: build, module: cuda, triaged, module: macos; title: Installer not setting rpath for MAGMA (OS X w/ GPU) | issue #17666: stale/low urgency; labels: module: build, triaged; title: Building pytorch on ARM failed | issue #30744: sta...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6eba40ac70483284038c060b9ca4e9e124250d9094cd8decde9f022290954eda
+BUNDLE-1215,bundle:bundle-1215,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: build (140 issues),issue_group,,module: build stale/low urgency batch 26,module: build,"Run one module: build stale-resolution sweep covering 140 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"1505, 4906, 9433, 9893, 10691, 11113, 11213, 11854, 12609, 12828, 12830, 14477, 15303, 15812, 16090, 16499, 17525, 17644, 20206, 23482, 24810, 31943, 31994, 32083, 37113, 38193, 39634, 42353, 42689, 44172, 44726, 44814, 45073, 45448, 46157, 47281, 48483, 49795, 49810, 50206, 50888, 50944, 51015, 51074, 51084, 51231, 51302, 51868, 52096, 52168, 52208, 52318, 52598, 52605, 53710, 54279, 54829, 54905, 55329, 55461, 56038, 56110, 56161, 56465, 56710, 56777, 57108, 57123, 57370, 57440, 58054, 58596, 58672, 58944, 59457, 59531, 59542, 59935, 60448, 60674, 60848, 60950, 61468, 61510, 61695, 61718, 61730, 61827, 61930, 62656, 63574, 64308, 64527, 65062, 65446, 65475, 65572, 66196, 66271, 67284, 67642, 67758, 67968, 68163, 69086, 69286, 69360, 70138, 70521, 71228, 71396, 71471, 71518, 71660, 71682, 73062, 73355, 73394, 74398, 74421, 74896, 75180, 75565, 75895, 75911, 77411, 77546, 129358, 141235, 144931, 147001, 153933, 159838, 160167, 160225, 162280, 162283, 162352, 163950, 164786",,140,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: build stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #39634: stale/low urgency; labels: module: build, module: cuda, triaged, module: macos; title: Installation from source fails on macOS (No CUDA) | issue #10691: stale/low urgency; labels: module: build, triaged; title: Build system doesn't prevent ATen/core from including non-core files | issue #50206: stale/low urgency; labels: module: build, triaged; title: Build Fail with vulkan on ARM64 and wayland drive...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",422802a3f5a6f69073e26e2708f19a9781f3936d98eef860d47bf219cb456e0f
+BUNDLE-1216,bundle:bundle-1216,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: build (138 issues),issue_group,,module: build stale/low urgency batch 17,module: build,"Run one module: build stale-resolution sweep covering 138 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"7035, 13118, 14367, 15309, 16843, 18993, 20576, 20686, 20753, 21135, 21399, 21777, 22370, 22406, 22541, 22580, 23233, 32694, 33385, 34611, 36041, 38090, 38536, 39917, 46803, 47568, 50718, 55437, 57423, 59592, 62168, 62630, 63188, 64692, 65161, 66573, 69063, 70243, 72393, 73554, 73563, 76105, 76206, 77614, 77738, 78248, 78530, 78882, 79021, 79202, 79387, 80742, 81065, 81543, 81544, 82276, 82710, 82871, 83157, 83509, 83714, 83977, 83979, 84050, 84805, 85590, 85618, 86192, 86544, 86660, 87080, 87352, 87389, 87449, 87589, 87642, 87957, 88004, 88265, 88389, 88616, 89293, 89490, 90256, 90395, 90895, 91406, 91417, 91697, 93206, 93240, 93944, 94739, 94801, 94804, 94912, 95135, 95369, 97397, 97421, 98459, 98587, 98917, 99035, 100054, 100123, 100957, 102732, 102753, 102761, 102966, 103131, 103212, 105060, 105904, 107389, 108851, 110238, 110795, 111410, 111566, 111654, 111907, 112330, 112857, 124018, 139065, 153863, 156434, 159232, 160248, 165100, 166064, 166167, 167970, 169072, 169675, 169816",,138,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: build stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #76206: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, module: build, triaged; title: Update NCCL to 2.12 | issue #81543: stale/low urgency; labels: module: build, triaged; title: Linking pytorch libraries causes sstream behavior to be overridden globally | issue #81544: stale/low urgency; labels: module: build, triaged; title: Torch does not build with Lazy TS disabled | issue #79202: stale/low urgency; la...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",76f37ea235499f7386ae476cb3bfcd0c818fc4c79aa0d3f401806b36be2ef793
+BUNDLE-1217,bundle:bundle-1217,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: build (25 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 3 issues - issue #30929: How to set not to build libtorch_cpu.so and libmkl_*.so dependencies?,module: build,"Run one module: build stale-resolution sweep covering 25 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"4716, 9204, 9310, 11071, 13207, 15004, 17966, 29093, 29739, 30929, 32407, 35363, 39947, 59218, 70608, 73113, 73412, 73487, 81692, 85773, 89491, 90547, 91524, 104113, 144206",,25,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: build stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"to the somewhat different list in cmake/Modules/FindBLAS.cmake (from which you can choose with a different variable). Note that because of #32407, it is not currently possible to specify Eigen and keep another BLAS out of the build. It accepts the Eigan preference, adds the he... | nclear what the benefit of choosing Eigen + *BLAS is over just choosing a BLAS lib It would be great, if this was clarified. Maybe rel...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5024149aa675e2ee359d07a5604638b6c8b485c2ff00b785b63e7ca4a41e2ad1
+BUNDLE-1218,bundle:bundle-1218,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: build (20 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #67153: Build not working with cuda 11.5,module: build,"Run one module: build stale-resolution sweep covering 20 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"17901, 21700, 24834, 25150, 28417, 29042, 31822, 34606, 37488, 40988, 43127, 43459, 46724, 46902, 47649, 56126, 66640, 67153, 70931, 88980",,20,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: build stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"Pytorch 1.10 doesn't support cuda 11.5, that support was added later. Duplicate of #67153 | duplicate of #46902? | Same Issue: #66640 | ome/cloudhan/workspaces/pytorch/build/lib/libtorch_cpu.so: undefined reference to `pthreadpool_compute_4d_tiled' similar issue mentioned in #34606 (comment) To Reproduce Steps to reproduce the behavior: build the code Expected behavior Environment PyTorch version: N/A Is debug......",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2e42a4337a3c31647b7c52471a6f8fb11ba21c2b311d8a9524caf544b028690b
+BUNDLE-1219,bundle:bundle-1219,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: build (14 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #17234: [feature request] build and move distributions w/ device and/or dtype,module: build,"Run one module: build stale-resolution sweep covering 14 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"7795, 12117, 13188, 15630, 16708, 17234, 71379, 106206, 106297, 108934, 108984, 147044, 152285, 172034",,14,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: build stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"#7795 is probably related to this. | rom a commit (c373387) more than 4 years ago. I strongly suspect that the situation has changed in the meantime. There's an existing issue (#71379) in the same vein, but IMO broader in scope than what the aim is for this issue: respecting (or at least not overriding) CMAKE_CUD... | Solved via #152285 (comment) that is pip install transformers -U if e.g. on Termux, where apt ins...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",22c3b3986f747658d8d3b00aa626f7602750787f1a05abe82d33b27eb96493e6
+BUNDLE-1220,bundle:bundle-1220,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: build warnings (10 issues),issue_group,,module: build warnings stale/low urgency,module: build warnings,"Run one module: build warnings stale-resolution sweep covering 10 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"22252, 27021, 35678, 36999, 39682, 54149, 55952, 62588, 69290, 81140",,10,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: build warnings stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #81140: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: build warnings; title: libprotobuf version compatibility | issue #69290: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: build warnings, Stale; title: Deprecation warnings generated when including header files in C++17 code | issue #55952: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: build warnings; title: Compiler warnings tracking | issue #62588: stale/low urg...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",00fdadd80e20ab6daf98fe26344e7a8577b469d092ff4330626c43446193f82f
+BUNDLE-1221,bundle:bundle-1221,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: c10d (76 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 3 issues - issue #104506: TImeout in NCCL doesn't work,module: c10d,"Run one module: c10d stale-resolution sweep covering 76 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"53658, 54021, 56836, 57547, 59256, 63802, 67312, 68803, 71134, 73121, 73683, 73825, 75097, 75773, 76288, 80022, 80372, 80417, 82091, 85604, 85621, 86225, 88103, 90544, 90848, 95572, 95895, 97268, 104506, 107298, 108158, 108900, 113543, 113546, 115388, 119215, 122931, 123447, 124950, 126008, 126032, 126381, 126544, 131755, 133877, 136312, 137014, 137268, 140301, 146956, 147179, 147502, 147631, 147677, 148048, 149177, 151965, 152527, 153302, 154847, 158793, 159013, 159014, 159015, 159017, 159018, 159019, 168453, 168454, 168455, 168456, 168457, 168458, 168459, 168460, 177815",,76,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: c10d stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,A related issue here: #104506 | Seems relevant to #88103 | ts and Proposals We want to use RFC to track all RFCs since each topic is an orthogonal one so discussions will be more focused. Topic one: #159013 (Mostly wanted and asked) Topic two: #159014 Topic three: #159015. Topic four: #159017 Topic five: #159018 Topic six: #159019 Alt... | bmit a PR. This benefits any torch.compile backend that lowers collectives...,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8d1a5d54c650a03dd58ba437fcbbf62127dd3333ca89d5736faea0b9f504a1ee
+BUNDLE-1222,bundle:bundle-1222,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: c10d (10 issues),issue_group,,module: c10d stale/low urgency batch 4,module: c10d,"Run one module: c10d stale-resolution sweep covering 10 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"10800, 16318, 46428, 48305, 49217, 53866, 73656, 108739, 150943, 151960",,10,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: c10d stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #53866: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: c10d, module: ddp; title: Add comprehensive subgroup testing to torch.distributed | issue #49217: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: c10d; title: Bug in profiler on CI machines when profiling NCCL distributed calls | issue #48305: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: rpc, module:...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a1a68f1b33ebc11d18bf4f0d3f59f31a77d592a789bc6d84d054ae822870fbcc
+BUNDLE-1223,bundle:bundle-1223,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: capabilitybasedpartitioner (2 issues),issue_group,,module: capabilitybasedpartitioner stale/low urgency,module: capabilitybasedpartitioner,"Run one module: capabilitybasedpartitioner stale-resolution sweep covering 2 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"81244, 81539",,2,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: capabilitybasedpartitioner stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #81539: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: fx, module: CapabilityBasedPartitioner, module: fx.passes; title: CapabilityBasedPartitioner treats non-compute ops inconsistently | issue #81244: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: fx, module: CapabilityBasedPartitioner; title: CapabilityBasedPartitioner does not work correctly with mutating operations",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",81280b7769ecdaf9fd5704abb08806344bd0eabedbe82fc9a08ac6be77dca37f
+BUNDLE-1224,bundle:bundle-1224,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: ci (111 issues),issue_group,,"Review thread: 6 issues - issue #152595: ROCm, 7900 XTX (gfx1100): Pytorch FLASH_ATTENTION SDPA is 2.5x slower than MATH (fp16, head_dim 256, seqlen 4360, 12 heads)",module: ci,"Run one module: ci stale-resolution sweep covering 111 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"14701, 43567, 52633, 65718, 71911, 72106, 72555, 72749, 72814, 72933, 73083, 73531, 73755, 74256, 74281, 75703, 76028, 76838, 76972, 77340, 78260, 78634, 79083, 79787, 79893, 79895, 79977, 80118, 80238, 81110, 81768, 81945, 81955, 81983, 82033, 82259, 83081, 83082, 84259, 85499, 86131, 86717, 87501, 87782, 88309, 88408, 92173, 95645, 96637, 103860, 104808, 106073, 106237, 106544, 107253, 107780, 115659, 117357, 117424, 117576, 117705, 123169, 123506, 123532, 124417, 125146, 126323, 126523, 127950, 129386, 129784, 130396, 131213, 131695, 136647, 137931, 137941, 138042, 138564, 139188, 139201, 140017, 140018, 140345, 141204, 141558, 143041, 143079, 143215, 144563, 144875, 145388, 148762, 149110, 149169, 150078, 151322, 152212, 152489, 152566, 152595, 152699, 152884, 153938, 154560, 156607, 165040, 165141, 169857, 177834, 188564",,111,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: ci stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"s confirmed for the current runs but not individually proven as the culprit for all 388 red runs. This is NOT covered by the existing issue #165040 ""DISABLED rocm / linux-jammy-rocm-py3_10-gfx1100 / test (default)"" (OPEN; module: rocm, module: ci) is adjacent but distinct: it'... | U is found, tests run and pass, and the job is killed purely by the 270-min wall-clock. (Other gfx1100 issues #152595 / #165141 / #169...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f944e73c38500c19387cd4c6cd69f6800098f68c7d5f02e67d40003dee16e533
+BUNDLE-1225,bundle:bundle-1225,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: ci (67 issues),issue_group,,module: ci stale/low urgency batch 2,module: ci,"Run one module: ci stale-resolution sweep covering 67 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"11578, 14839, 18692, 20111, 33477, 37512, 37847, 37880, 42655, 46065, 46066, 47208, 47669, 48878, 49642, 52984, 53910, 54006, 54938, 55330, 64868, 64939, 66775, 66902, 68193, 71152, 71407, 75419, 82139, 82443, 108174, 108175, 109770, 120710, 138696, 141764, 141984, 148335, 148336, 148338, 148339, 154074, 157379, 158127, 158782, 158876, 159866, 160240, 161281, 162182, 163302, 163577, 163657, 163902, 164493, 164860, 164951, 165173, 165684, 166011, 166072, 167351, 167670, 167746, 169184, 170266, 170365",,67,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: ci stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #164951: stale/low urgency; labels: module: ci, triaged; title: Docker checkouts take 30+ min on H100 runners | issue #158782: stale/low urgency; labels: module: ci, module: lint, triaged, enhancement, module: docker, better-engineering; title: [BE] linter for base docker image configurations with docker_builds.yml | issue #158127: stale/low urgency; labels: module: ci, triaged; title: A ""Merge-when-ready"" l...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5d7ac35dc19e70e88b46c883a26ca299651a3c63c61ded3794de3b4aa38aa97e
+BUNDLE-1226,bundle:bundle-1226,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: ci (2 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #116626: `test_modules.py` does not test for half precision or complex types,module: ci,"Run one module: ci stale-resolution sweep covering 2 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"116626, 122287",,2,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: ci stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"his thus far is that most modules tested in test_modules.py are only tested for torch.float32 and torch.float64, which is on my list to fix #116626 (comment) So far I have only enabled float16 testing for MPS. Let me know if you are keen to help with this :)",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",63a18bf495aa90b9dce19d12772142c85415fb3fcec694acb0ddd4fc9c3c7fe2
+BUNDLE-1227,bundle:bundle-1227,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: codegen (34 issues),issue_group,,module: codegen stale/low urgency batch 2,module: codegen,"Run one module: codegen stale-resolution sweep covering 34 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"4102, 17257, 40250, 42863, 43114, 44738, 46061, 49416, 50987, 53023, 54001, 58087, 58124, 58765, 60149, 60153, 62591, 63356, 66341, 69471, 73425, 73505, 75904, 77251, 83214, 84265, 84616, 87178, 88598, 100062, 103160, 103370, 111157, 162398",,34,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: codegen stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #73425: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: codegen; title: ufunc codegen support for dtypes that are supported on CUDA but not CPU | issue #43114: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: codegen; title: out kwargs are sometimes inconsistent with returned named tuple field name (and in some cases, cannot be made consistent) | issue #66341: stale/low urgency; labels: module: internals, triaged, mo...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",78934821eeafdda5cad21a64f76e5155e64405d5cbdb271ebaf4292cad494702
+BUNDLE-1228,bundle:bundle-1228,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: collect_env.py (5 issues),issue_group,,module: collect_env.py stale/low urgency,module: collect_env.py,"Run one module: collect_env.py stale-resolution sweep covering 5 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"18658, 72768, 96447, 124025, 144615",,5,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: collect_env.py stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #144615: stale/low urgency; labels: module: collect_env.py, triaged, module: devx; title: `collect_env.py` fails with `'NoneType' object has no attribute 'splitlines'` if pytorch is installed without pip | issue #124025: stale/low urgency; labels: module: numerical-stability, module: docs, module: collect_env.py, triaged; title: Different results for single sample vs. batched | issue #96447: stale/low urgenc...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",49aed29d6ba6046c08670dca42e9a0afec5ae252123203e51bfce19e921a75ce
+BUNDLE-1229,bundle:bundle-1229,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: compile ux (5 issues),issue_group,,module: compile ux stale/low urgency,module: compile ux,"Run one module: compile ux stale-resolution sweep covering 5 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"131263, 133944, 147428, 150021, 158873",,5,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: compile ux stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #150021: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, oncall: pt2, module: dynamo, empathy-day, module: compile ux; title: [ued] I want to see the full sizes/strides in TORCH_LOGS=recompiles | issue #133944: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, oncall: pt2, module: dynamo, module: compile ux; title: torch.compile ""run at compile time"" decorator. | issue #131263: stale/low urgency; labels: feature, triaged, oncall: pt2...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",981d14224c33b2d1bfd91706481f6b4f3723f2fcf99413c346dfb42b562edbbf
+BUNDLE-1230,bundle:bundle-1230,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: compile-time (12 issues),issue_group,,module: compile-time stale/low urgency,module: compile-time,"Run one module: compile-time stale-resolution sweep covering 12 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"93716, 97155, 109074, 119128, 128071, 128153, 130119, 135489, 143670, 149957, 154456, 156520",,12,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: compile-time stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #119128: stale/low urgency; labels: low priority, triaged, oncall: pt2, module: dynamo, module: compile-time, no-scrub; title: [dynamo] Refactor switch statements to improve compile times | issue #109074: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, oncall: pt2, module: inductor, upstream triton, module: compile-time; title: torch.compile/triton holding GIL during compilation and CompiledKernel call results in deadlo...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8af7c89a6254d9ea4131bda445003a011a5c45fc640144fb94a75fd973065119
+BUNDLE-1231,bundle:bundle-1231,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: compiled autograd (7 issues),issue_group,,module: compiled autograd stale/low urgency,module: compiled autograd,"Run one module: compiled autograd stale-resolution sweep covering 7 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"124866, 138215, 138901, 142104, 143759, 144982, 155105",,7,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: compiled autograd stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #138215: stale/low urgency; labels: feature, triaged, actionable, oncall: pt2, module: compiled autograd, dynamo-autograd-function; title: Dynamo x autograd.Function: leverage compiled autograd on graph break in backwards | issue #124866: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, enhancement, oncall: pt2, module: higher order operators, module: compiled autograd, module: pt2-dispatcher; title: support side effects...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",186c639582b9f730190b9e99d35f49c0602c4b7ec73b3bbd6114734017d9ae6e
+BUNDLE-1232,bundle:bundle-1232,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: complex (102 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 7 issues - issue #118507: RuntimeError in torch.istft with center=False: Window Overlap Add Issue,module: complex,"Run one module: complex stale-resolution sweep covering 102 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"35312, 36175, 36469, 37314, 38650, 39123, 39128, 39270, 40590, 41244, 41246, 43579, 44611, 44741, 44817, 45690, 46374, 46642, 47052, 48000, 48486, 49133, 50097, 50098, 51210, 51455, 51714, 52457, 53440, 54753, 56012, 57358, 60941, 61909, 62884, 63138, 64186, 65306, 67324, 67333, 69287, 70073, 71465, 71472, 71635, 71671, 72134, 72341, 74537, 74748, 75862, 76012, 76166, 77046, 77731, 78050, 78170, 80256, 81428, 81749, 81982, 83376, 86340, 90447, 91309, 92398, 92683, 92818, 94395, 94718, 96704, 104466, 104516, 108882, 113750, 115164, 116018, 116414, 117232, 117236, 117245, 118507, 121588, 125198, 125718, 125746, 131283, 134323, 135210, 136568, 136621, 139349, 142392, 148670, 151182, 154496, 154501, 154606, 157272, 159870, 160629, 163984",,102,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: complex stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"Is this potentially the same as #134323 ? | t-device synchronization. This has been discussed in other issues regarding reconstruction with certain windows when center=False ( #62323, #91309), but my proposal is from a performance standpoint (https://discuss.pytorch.org/t/torch-istft-nola-check-causes-synchronization-an... | o signal processing. This is a non-exhaustive compilation of issues: pytorch/audio/issues/...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1b9928d980c243c95826dc1d77da1c8fbecbedf86adc61199fcdac8360f23ed7
+BUNDLE-1233,bundle:bundle-1233,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: complex (13 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 3 issues - issue #135860: Lobpcg for complex gives wrong results.,module: complex,"Run one module: complex stale-resolution sweep covering 13 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"36444, 52332, 55661, 71446, 76483, 76558, 76853, 82510, 82565, 127075, 135860, 137767, 156152",,13,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: complex stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,#134487 torch.nn.functional.normalize: #135428 torch.sigmoid: #135777 torch.lobpcg: #135860 torch.exp: #136063 torch.asin: #138327 #141487 #156152 cc @jgong5 @mingfeima @XiaobingSuper @sanchitintel @ashokei @jingxu10 @ezyang @anjali411 @dylanbespalko @mruberry @nikitaved @amjames | es: torch.linalg.norm & torch.norm: #132634 torch.acos: #134487 torch.nn.functional.normalize: #135428 torch.sigmoid: #135777 torch.lo...,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",69e1ed6467466a9911e6cdafd0fc0d0e2de5f4f5a46a4d4bc95b4abf5578187c
+BUNDLE-1234,bundle:bundle-1234,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: context parallel (2 issues),issue_group,,module: context parallel stale/low urgency,module: context parallel,"Run one module: context parallel stale-resolution sweep covering 2 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"147793, 151878",,2,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: context parallel stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #151878: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: dtensor, module: context parallel; title: Potential error in calling scaled_dot_product_attention in pytorch/torch/testing/_internal/distributed/_tensor /common_dtensor.py ? | issue #147793: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: sdpa, module: context parallel; title: context_parallel fails with plain sdpa ker...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",82446813f42b8916f71fff06e6a52ab58b40213252ac90bfb5bfc2a578bd3109
+BUNDLE-1235,bundle:bundle-1235,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: convolution (108 issues),issue_group,,"Review thread: 12 issues - issue #124931: Missing description of Transformer argument ""memory_mask"" shape in 3D (including the batch dimension) case",module: convolution,"Run one module: convolution stale-resolution sweep covering 108 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"7740, 7806, 10685, 11974, 13268, 13505, 17150, 21462, 21876, 22330, 22577, 22919, 23547, 23854, 24826, 24930, 25132, 28657, 29369, 29713, 30399, 30934, 32529, 32590, 34573, 35603, 35655, 40275, 40761, 41311, 42663, 46027, 47341, 47915, 48439, 48945, 49207, 49459, 50190, 51711, 53178, 53191, 54906, 55045, 56224, 56246, 56263, 58343, 58414, 58858, 58859, 58860, 58862, 59730, 61772, 62672, 64145, 64544, 65510, 65661, 66963, 67071, 70184, 72850, 73413, 74092, 75495, 75500, 76244, 77821, 77838, 77900, 77901, 78262, 79222, 82093, 83579, 88147, 101871, 106450, 112376, 113713, 115610, 117963, 119677, 121261, 121715, 123533, 124931, 127221, 127375, 128936, 133114, 134641, 136086, 136479, 139066, 142467, 144445, 149534, 150614, 152992, 153139, 157334, 161778, 163408, 165744, 165976",,108,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: convolution stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"Related: #163774 #149534 (comment) | Is this a duplicate of #24930? | Relevant older issue: #24826 Note that we generally maintain a high bar for inclusion of new modules into torch.nn, as each addition comes with a steep maintenance cost | e transformer module #25538 Doc update #28719, #28657 Additional attention layers (e.g. AugmentedConv, StandAloneAttention) - need research #32529 Add embedding layer and posit...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",282ca4b50bd31b694f7d91c536d24e8010fa6facb72fe81ff0990facbfc6fff1
+BUNDLE-1236,bundle:bundle-1236,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: convolution (15 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 5 issues - issue #121596: Memory Usage of Conv2d Rapidly Increases when Params >1G,module: convolution,"Run one module: convolution stale-resolution sweep covering 15 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"4632, 22532, 23068, 25821, 26396, 26950, 52211, 52439, 75363, 76354, 94869, 121596, 123157, 168692, 168696",,15,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: convolution stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"y of setting these options for a given gemm call - either with with statement, or maybe even better also allowing some explicit hints= arg: #52439 | Might be related: #52439 | And unfortunately no easy way of logging / forcing the algo choice for a given op call :( #52439 | m2col, as 512 * 2048^2 * 3^2 * 2 = 36G and very close the increased memory usage. Similiar thoughts are also mentioned in pytorch forum and #2...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9937b657d68b2e979c5cc002ca1df31bbf15287677f68837723a9e82d238069c
+BUNDLE-1237,bundle:bundle-1237,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: copy on write (3 issues),issue_group,,module: copy on write stale/low urgency,module: copy on write,"Run one module: copy on write stale-resolution sweep covering 3 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"97856, 109833, 132485",,3,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: copy on write stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #132485: stale/low urgency; labels: module: cuda, triaged, module: copy on write; title: lazy_clone does not work for pinned memory | issue #109833: stale/low urgency; labels: module: internals, triaged, module: viewing and reshaping, module: copy on write; title: Implement Copy-on-write (COW) tensors | issue #97856: stale/low urgency; labels: module: internals, triaged, module: copy on write; title: make te...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e033c75f5d51e73413ac5afa3c7728c94baaf36b6fd57c83cddda742418220f5
+BUNDLE-1238,bundle:bundle-1238,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: core aten (3 issues),issue_group,,"Review thread: 2 issues - issue #137482: `torch.ops.aten.divide_` leads to ""RuntimeError: result type Float can't be cast to the desired output type Int""",module: core aten,"Run one module: core aten stale-resolution sweep covering 3 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"42246, 133941, 137482",,3,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: core aten stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"I don't think #42246 was fixed, but sure, if you have a fix in mind, please do not hesitate to propose a PR. | issue #133941: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: core aten; title: Why core aten IR doesn’t contain scalar_tensor overload version of some ops, like bitwise-like ops, remainder and so on?",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",016d017212a8ad4844dab9db360e47d575565340c7457c93510af08737ec8e0c
+BUNDLE-1239,bundle:bundle-1239,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: correctness (silent) (71 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #142515: [MPS] `out_channels` <= 2**16 guard for convolution is too broad,module: correctness (silent),"Run one module: correctness (silent) stale-resolution sweep covering 71 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"5272, 24168, 25478, 48281, 48900, 55355, 57721, 59515, 61538, 65083, 67470, 68070, 70397, 70398, 71774, 73190, 73870, 76232, 78064, 79788, 80494, 80776, 81996, 83015, 84202, 86074, 86465, 89320, 94183, 94186, 96225, 96982, 97631, 100334, 101167, 101878, 101934, 103023, 104106, 104832, 107214, 107381, 107455, 107478, 107694, 111479, 113956, 114350, 120237, 121439, 121961, 122030, 124029, 125051, 131736, 132605, 133100, 134430, 134534, 136031, 136623, 137951, 137968, 142515, 142836, 147510, 151740, 153957, 158199, 162362, 169738",,71,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: correctness (silent) stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"oduce support for convolutions with out_channels > 2**16. While this appeared to work for Conv1d, it introduced a regression in Conv2d (see #142515 (comment)). It remains unclear whether Conv3d is affected. The issue results in a silent correctness bug. A guard was previously... | Could be related to this #120237 | issue #125051: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: correctness (silent), module: mps; title:...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",94cc1780b2458c0b53325d2ab58be6a991ca4fa0d1344048f1909bbc90960965
+BUNDLE-1240,bundle:bundle-1240,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: cpp (95 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 4 issues - issue #102517: [feature request] PyTorch support for sub-interpreters with PEP 684 accepted and release in Python 3.12,module: cpp,"Run one module: cpp stale-resolution sweep covering 95 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"9912, 9950, 10950, 12868, 14959, 17554, 17614, 17879, 18630, 23490, 25646, 25979, 26456, 28929, 31178, 32166, 32614, 35723, 35872, 36577, 36914, 39522, 40729, 40959, 41177, 41525, 41903, 41955, 42848, 43490, 45855, 46712, 47591, 49320, 50375, 52575, 52744, 53157, 53584, 53622, 53983, 54058, 54201, 54815, 54874, 56522, 56781, 59074, 59418, 62566, 63479, 63897, 64206, 65984, 66755, 67902, 70160, 70416, 71069, 73171, 74101, 74942, 75562, 76103, 77161, 77241, 78876, 78880, 79004, 80580, 81625, 82542, 84473, 85078, 87706, 90424, 90751, 94827, 97802, 97849, 98907, 99225, 100741, 101210, 102517, 102533, 103570, 103671, 103756, 103837, 105943, 106533, 108651, 115034, 117938",,95,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: cpp stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,Maybe related #102517 | estion would be of zero-copy in-RAM IPC data exchange: maybe via named pipes? Some mmaps? shm? I found older issues asking the same: #23490 #10950 This might be important for working in hosted multi-threaded environments where every thread runs its own Python / PyTorch code. T... | 🚀 Feature support python sub-interpreters and maintains all status of the torch library. Motivation as #10950...,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",34ddf30e59a446ca7d88187f50b046bd9b0d87df0705b2a5d48f1642a081eff6
+BUNDLE-1241,bundle:bundle-1241,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: cpp (86 issues),issue_group,,module: cpp stale/low urgency batch 3,module: cpp,"Run one module: cpp stale-resolution sweep covering 86 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"12795, 15149, 15491, 16375, 17797, 17984, 18283, 19125, 19453, 19499, 20315, 20531, 21050, 21405, 21828, 21899, 21902, 22022, 22536, 23301, 23859, 25520, 25635, 26086, 26659, 27055, 27958, 28930, 31688, 32237, 32415, 32421, 33301, 33303, 33514, 33811, 34052, 34068, 34881, 35078, 35441, 35640, 35713, 35770, 36004, 36099, 36891, 40098, 40581, 41213, 42665, 44533, 45139, 48548, 48959, 73016, 79272, 89051, 111704, 117930, 118478, 118723, 119486, 120085, 121485, 125471, 128509, 130514, 134098, 134637, 138387, 138940, 138981, 143564, 144955, 145337, 145493, 145656, 147581, 150548, 153463, 155011, 163502, 167762, 168376, 169893",,86,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: cpp stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #19453: stale/low urgency; labels: module: cpp, triaged; title: How to load PyTorch model with LSTM using C++ api | issue #17984: stale/low urgency; labels: module: cpp, triaged; title: ""unknown builtin op"" error with static library | issue #130514: stale/low urgency; labels: module: cpp, module: cuda, triaged; title: C++ API Does Not Expose Lazy NVRTC | issue #128509: stale/low urgency; labels: module: cpp-...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f74357cbe8e7c054a07235d3ceab8be582da58da221e9c8b8f69c9416b10e57b
+BUNDLE-1242,bundle:bundle-1242,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: cpp-extensions (44 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 5 issues - issue #55655: Performance debugging / warning mode,module: cpp-extensions,"Run one module: cpp-extensions stale-resolution sweep covering 44 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"12449, 16873, 17849, 18805, 37766, 54077, 55363, 55655, 57118, 58779, 59251, 68768, 72948, 75725, 78708, 81899, 82132, 90775, 95786, 99143, 113550, 114935, 114962, 118842, 119190, 119206, 119633, 121131, 124454, 132130, 136664, 140015, 142145, 144690, 148920, 149798, 152032, 154187, 155378, 161068, 163142, 163659, 166219, 170542",,44,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: cpp-extensions stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"t new types of messaging and control it (see #55655)? There are also issues with our current messages and other logging systems, like VLOG (#57118) and GLOG (#14724). This issue proposes we add a messaging system to PyTorch that address these issues. It should have the followi... | rograms for nondeterminism or using deprecated operations? How do we make it easier to implement new types of messaging and control it...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",928505c1998d3722e5d200995e1a99be813a7084342f13e464d47a2519152d28
+BUNDLE-1243,bundle:bundle-1243,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: cpu (109 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 25 issues - issue #15386: F.grid_sample doesn't respect padding_mode when height of inputs is 1,module: cpu,"Run one module: cpu stale-resolution sweep covering 109 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"2180, 2732, 3468, 4085, 4703, 4825, 5388, 5565, 9873, 13018, 15386, 16717, 18987, 19163, 19437, 19825, 19826, 20367, 21457, 21602, 22331, 22687, 22803, 23509, 24303, 24470, 24823, 24870, 25014, 25039, 26534, 28390, 30388, 30565, 32023, 33725, 34728, 35937, 36107, 36108, 41399, 44343, 47447, 48245, 48389, 48641, 50334, 50335, 50336, 50337, 50338, 50339, 50340, 50341, 52291, 61528, 68394, 70239, 72408, 74876, 81868, 88565, 88658, 88805, 90695, 91156, 91374, 91936, 93188, 94322, 94457, 95108, 95945, 99690, 104602, 105778, 107433, 108496, 110858, 112714, 114080, 117429, 118499, 123047, 124934, 125547, 125744, 126115, 131011, 132386, 132395, 132579, 133304, 134459, 134996, 135542, 138337, 139472, 140112, 149304, 151037, 151463, 152294, 153919, 154017, 155671, 156959, 162719, 163052",,109,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: cpu stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"As detailed in #81868, I am encountering precision issues with grid_sample in bilinear mode at discrete pixel locations. Simple experimentation seems to point to | If I understand correctly, @andreaskoepf is suggesting at #24870 (comment) that a better downsampling grid_sample result could be achieved by filtering the image in different ways before sampling. This co | gn_corners=False: 1.2069940567016602e-06 Basel...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",cd26b3fb8c34599187464058be5072ce5637b25ad7f78045db0e48c2119c50ee
+BUNDLE-1244,bundle:bundle-1244,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: cpu (12 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #76654: `torch.sort` does not exploit parallelization when invoked without the `dim` parameter.,module: cpu,"Run one module: cpu stale-resolution sweep covering 12 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"18634, 21731, 22414, 30803, 31356, 31474, 76654, 76655, 90760, 97068, 101359, 145233",,12,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: cpu stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"and the remaining dimensions will have more than >33k elements, you will see a nice speed-up on a multi-core machine. Sure! I opened here. #76655 | try to sort 1 dimention tensors. Alternatives Maybe you could implement merge sort or other parallel sorting algorithms Additional context #76654 I have a report and code here import torch import torch.nn as nn import torch.multiprocessing as mp import torch.distribute...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7ba8eac2abe500791eb77c5c9b6fe6e8173a61eb16e59a6b67b638dfdadcac9b
+BUNDLE-1245,bundle:bundle-1245,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: cpu_tensor_apply (2 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #24478: Port CPU_tensor_apply functions to TensorIterator (umbrella issue),module: cpu_tensor_apply,"Run one module: cpu_tensor_apply stale-resolution sweep covering 2 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"24478, 24498",,2,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: cpu_tensor_apply stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"pare.cpp:18 pytorch/aten/src/ATen/native/TensorCompare.cpp Line 18 in eabfca3 at::CPU_tensor_apply4<scalar_t, uint8_t, scalar_t, scalar_t>( #24498 Migrate CPU_tensor_apply to TensorIterator in aten/src/ATen/native/TensorCompare.cpp:30 pytorch/aten/src/ATen/native/TensorCompare... | , scalar_t, scalar_t>( How to use TensorIterator: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/wiki/How-to-use-TensorIterator Additional Instruc...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6d2b1e3ed9f42227bc8e8e01ac8fda37d0f91261d40295e7ffbf05e5a086fa63
+BUNDLE-1246,bundle:bundle-1246,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: crash (7 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 5 issues - issue #41950: [docs] Clarify behavior of torch.cuda.device_count() when torch compiled without CUDA (cpu-only) or when CUDA is not available,module: crash,"Run one module: crash stale-resolution sweep covering 7 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"41950, 51872, 52675, 62931, 80337, 92250, 99982",,7,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: crash stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,n try to run the two setups under strace (or maybe ltrace?) to find any such differences Some related issues / discussions are linked at in #52675. Please chime in and add your usecase there too :) My main suggestion there is that torch.cuda.is_available() and related function... | Related: #41950 #52675 #62931 | Related in the sense of theme of avoiding CUDA initialization for functioning: #52675 | s the indices...,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e38e805181a727507eee3b52864429aa79c6e22f70e29b7376003bdf1c672ea6
+BUNDLE-1247,bundle:bundle-1247,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: cublas (31 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #102963: torch.svd fails on large matrices,module: cublas,"Run one module: cublas stale-resolution sweep covering 31 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"21459, 21587, 30596, 34576, 38553, 42800, 43325, 51351, 53473, 58670, 75549, 83272, 91653, 91958, 94294, 100850, 101428, 102459, 102963, 103499, 107800, 116184, 118774, 120240, 124262, 132300, 137389, 141210, 154248, 157054, 166004",,31,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: cublas stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"m the function's parameter check (possibly n*lda*batchSize>INT32_MAX, or lda<max(1,n), see the cusolverDnXsyevBatched documentation). Maybe #102963 hits a similar check. Meanwhile, because we use symmetric real 3x3 matrices, we ware able to work around the issue by using a clo... | issue #107800: stale/low urgency; labels: feature, module: cuda, triaged, module: cublas; title: [feature request] [discussion] Includ...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",228036d3145c2706e6ba41cb9df3ccab52726ed54bda1a62e49de4fc11e4e497
+BUNDLE-1248,bundle:bundle-1248,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: cuda (67 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 4 issues - issue #23940: Improve the performance of linear algebra operations in CUDA for small problem sizes,module: cuda,"Run one module: cuda stale-resolution sweep covering 67 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"10454, 10615, 23940, 28829, 37406, 37664, 40770, 44380, 47953, 48559, 53879, 55122, 55207, 59692, 67978, 68272, 69364, 72138, 74235, 88838, 89160, 89884, 98925, 104152, 104591, 104702, 108858, 113560, 115618, 117122, 118991, 119131, 121857, 126344, 127062, 127225, 127521, 129523, 129627, 132218, 137564, 137581, 140069, 140214, 140687, 140930, 141915, 142127, 144025, 144611, 144612, 145145, 145349, 145350, 145453, 146040, 146056, 147284, 147682, 147874, 148885, 149802, 150574, 150700, 152335, 153210, 159447",,67,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: cuda stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"Cross-posting an issue I created a year ago: #23940 and an issue I created two years ago: #13546. | ch 1.9 linear algebra development plan See #47953 (comment) For detailed MAGMA mechanism See #47953 (comment) See also #42666 #26996 #42403 #53879 cc @ezyang @gchanan @zou3519 @bdhirsh @ngimel @vishwakftw @jianyuh @nikitaved @pearu @mruberry @heitorschueroff @walterddr @Vitaly... | * N]); } printf(""\n""); } } See als...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",bea615aa40803a8ade7fb4f7a0ba38343b7ea69be58a9a4fd48ba17a898a3736
+BUNDLE-1249,bundle:bundle-1249,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: cuda (140 issues),issue_group,,module: cuda stale/low urgency batch 6,module: cuda,"Run one module: cuda stale-resolution sweep covering 140 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"1328, 1750, 3390, 3396, 3600, 4987, 13786, 14996, 16542, 18849, 20864, 21061, 21780, 22383, 22785, 22961, 23026, 23061, 24016, 24176, 24963, 25045, 25297, 25752, 25820, 27024, 27138, 27297, 27540, 27780, 27926, 27975, 28791, 29198, 29516, 29528, 29545, 29553, 29710, 29961, 30404, 30528, 30569, 31038, 31261, 31425, 31570, 32370, 32504, 32510, 32868, 33051, 33979, 34323, 34878, 36160, 36638, 37048, 37153, 37549, 37585, 37682, 38671, 38911, 38996, 38997, 39317, 39632, 40020, 40548, 40667, 42074, 42301, 43281, 43685, 44248, 44547, 44624, 44943, 45447, 45578, 46379, 46899, 47111, 48202, 48706, 49332, 64491, 68959, 76071, 77049, 81717, 119420, 122274, 123548, 123834, 129649, 140696, 142232, 145471, 147011, 149155, 149196, 151433, 152150, 152756, 152922, 153502, 153534, 153649, 154428, 154602, 155798, 156238, 156618, 157502, 157950, 158172, 158444, 158641, 158831, 159301, 159564, 159674, 159914, 160308, 160816, 160838, 160891, 162127, 162402, 162582, 163062, 163709, 163982, 164249, 164799, 165715, 165741, 165826",,140,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: cuda stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #123548: stale/low urgency; labels: module: docs, module: cuda, module: memory usage, triaged, module: CUDACachingAllocator; title: An error occurs when ‘max_split_size_mb ’and ‘expandable_segments ’ are enabled at the same time. | issue #157502: stale/low urgency; labels: module: cuda, triaged; title: Failure with cub::TransformInputIterator in 12.9 periodic CI test | issue #147011: stale/low urgency; label...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",64f50cd7008cf61d0e27c1bbda0cb8c8a100b30acf7e54f86b0a027007c3338e
+BUNDLE-1250,bundle:bundle-1250,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: cuda (140 issues),issue_group,,module: cuda stale/low urgency batch 29,module: cuda,"Run one module: cuda stale-resolution sweep covering 140 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"12060, 23780, 24081, 24401, 27588, 30246, 32524, 32881, 36066, 36560, 36706, 37713, 41852, 43546, 45428, 46024, 46386, 48832, 49023, 49095, 50036, 50185, 50268, 50354, 50829, 50925, 51224, 51644, 52041, 52145, 52266, 52570, 52644, 53130, 53957, 54047, 54307, 54564, 55277, 55643, 55736, 55756, 56350, 56694, 58385, 58474, 58626, 59071, 59309, 59778, 60306, 61525, 61890, 62031, 62265, 62648, 62661, 62695, 63069, 63226, 63837, 63992, 63998, 65100, 65301, 66076, 66473, 66482, 66936, 67208, 67388, 68165, 68323, 68909, 69772, 70490, 70669, 70901, 71301, 71414, 71495, 71697, 72709, 73003, 73196, 73461, 74146, 74391, 74679, 75025, 75198, 75494, 76043, 76743, 77397, 77951, 78018, 78518, 78581, 78884, 81620, 81988, 82061, 82200, 83148, 83392, 84194, 84309, 84336, 84445, 85227, 85377, 85387, 85841, 85889, 86449, 86493, 86551, 86782, 86798, 87539, 87841, 87992, 88027, 88081, 88189, 88191, 88410, 88563, 88639, 89245, 90793, 90999, 91375, 91536, 91582, 95058, 95077, 95169, 95237",,140,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: cuda stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #53130: stale/low urgency; labels: module: cuda, module: lint, triaged; title: Lint rule to forbid bare assert() in cuda | issue #52644: stale/low urgency; labels: module: cuda, triaged, enhancement; title: [FR] torch.load's map_location supports int | issue #52570: stale/low urgency; labels: module: performance, module: cuda, triaged; title: RTX 2080s performs better than RTX 3080 in Semantic Segmentation i...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8de0ffea1eaf3f9064d898dedb80858f082a67441be8ebdd10aa19546c6017da
+BUNDLE-1251,bundle:bundle-1251,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: cuda (140 issues),issue_group,,module: cuda stale/low urgency batch 2,module: cuda,"Run one module: cuda stale-resolution sweep covering 140 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"11340, 13058, 16266, 20655, 22573, 30401, 30711, 32575, 37324, 41970, 42080, 43623, 44156, 44551, 48163, 50198, 52718, 58155, 58812, 62350, 65528, 67680, 68961, 70701, 72117, 72791, 74393, 75391, 81883, 82073, 87696, 89342, 89730, 90261, 94966, 95121, 95648, 95696, 95768, 98193, 98481, 99138, 99372, 99812, 100145, 100425, 101890, 103495, 103589, 104107, 104322, 104867, 104925, 104981, 105726, 106520, 106606, 107201, 107374, 107528, 107864, 108277, 108407, 108494, 108645, 109383, 109494, 109863, 110014, 110116, 110194, 110252, 111024, 111349, 111363, 111466, 112847, 113053, 113326, 113408, 113449, 113743, 113847, 114040, 114943, 115331, 115340, 115418, 115735, 116543, 116870, 117130, 117910, 118373, 118859, 118863, 119624, 120996, 121203, 121641, 122068, 122092, 122170, 123505, 123604, 124351, 124456, 124838, 126748, 127196, 128296, 128601, 128791, 128988, 129670, 129954, 130078, 130124, 130193, 131491, 131655, 131656, 133280, 133281, 133629, 134403, 134441, 134607, 134851, 148681, 150517, 152731, 166234, 166409, 166611, 166651, 167409, 167420, 167724, 168158",,140,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: cuda stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #133629: stale/low urgency; labels: module: cuda, triaged, module: CUDACachingAllocator; title: RuntimeError: free_upper_bound + pytorch_used_bytes[device] | issue #152731: stale/low urgency; labels: module: cuda, low priority, triaged, module: half, actionable, module: edge cases; title: Inconsistent float16 overflow behavior between CPU and CUDA devices | issue #168158: stale/low urgency; labels: module: c...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",067772096da6340c01a610878310bd6696687ee557a33c2c872d959b4fc7cb85
+BUNDLE-1252,bundle:bundle-1252,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: cuda (52 issues),issue_group,,module: cuda stale/low urgency batch 10,module: cuda,"Run one module: cuda stale-resolution sweep covering 52 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"12819, 17350, 19229, 19335, 19599, 20562, 29554, 36990, 40989, 43947, 44103, 47996, 51075, 58466, 63079, 63618, 69688, 73176, 82886, 88380, 97210, 98414, 99410, 114153, 116242, 132041, 132045, 132047, 135837, 136812, 136815, 137174, 138453, 138829, 139115, 139333, 139342, 139382, 139648, 149187, 149821, 167526, 169237, 169266, 169390, 169909, 169956, 170694, 171039, 171286, 171697, 171771",,52,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: cuda stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #139648: stale/low urgency; labels: module: cuda, module: tests, triaged, module: mta; title: [Tracker] complex128 tests are disabled for all foreach internally | issue #139342: stale/low urgency; labels: module: cuda, triaged, module: python frontend; title: torch.logcumsumexp runtime error inconsistency on CPU and CUDA (also documentation missing constraint) | issue #139333: stale/low urgency; labels: modu...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",341de58d96231ec4bfc4a3152d41bdf6e3334a1405c0e20cbfc1eed607fd8a46
+BUNDLE-1253,bundle:bundle-1253,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: cuda (18 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #47908: The speed of pytorch with cudatoolkit 11.0 is slower than cudatoolkit 10.2,module: cuda,"Run one module: cuda stale-resolution sweep covering 18 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"28619, 31528, 37250, 42109, 43453, 47908, 54408, 58136, 59168, 101159, 103820, 114569, 121894, 121969, 131650, 131667, 150285, 162235",,18,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: cuda stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"I tested the time on each GPU for 1000 rounds. I don't think it is measuring error. I do not mean RTX 3090 itself is low. Since I also read #47908 , I guess it is because PyTorch with CUDA 11 has the problem in efficiency, and RTX 3090 has not choice but to use it. If you are... | ch 1.8.0 + CUDA 10.2 = 0.6 ms RTX 3090 + PyTorch 1.8.0 + CUDA 11.1 = 0.94 ms RTX 3090 + PyTorch 1.7.0 + CUDA 11.0 = 1.12 ms I also foun...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",01c8e07430fa8670157b265b25363bcba3997855db8e8d2a155e41d765a18fee
+BUNDLE-1254,bundle:bundle-1254,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: cuda graphs (26 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #154824: torch inductor cudagraph tree could incorrectly release some input nodes during replay,module: cuda graphs,"Run one module: cuda graphs stale-resolution sweep covering 26 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"66858, 71896, 85201, 87163, 91950, 92217, 102830, 115339, 118018, 118715, 119873, 126753, 132856, 133984, 148927, 149944, 150482, 150484, 150488, 153025, 154824, 156820, 159384, 160281, 171263, 175557",,26,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: cuda graphs stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"_weakrefs() in cudagraph_trees.py — it frees storages that are still needed as inputs to subsequent warmup nodes. This is the same issue as #154824. Crashes at step 1 with mode=""reduce-overhead"", reproduces on PyTorch 2.8 and 2.10. I also found a secondary issue on the same co... | issue #171263: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: cuda graphs; title: [CUDA Graphs] Capture failure leaves generator state co...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",696f502224b07f6d4852dd255f334dfbc6ba9e0a0fbe73e64682b1ae45818d01
+BUNDLE-1255,bundle:bundle-1255,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: cudacachingallocator (11 issues),issue_group,,module: cudacachingallocator stale/low urgency,module: cudacachingallocator,"Run one module: cudacachingallocator stale-resolution sweep covering 11 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"111366, 112377, 119452, 130162, 154603, 159149, 159164, 159906, 160405, 160420, 166116",,11,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: cudacachingallocator stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #112377: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: CUDACachingAllocator; title: RuntimeError: NVML_SUCCESS == r INTERNAL ASSERT FAILED at ""/opt/conda/conda-bld/pytorch_1695392020201/work/c10/cuda/CUDACachingAllocator.cpp"":1154, please report a bug to PyTorch. | issue #166116: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: CUDACachingAllocator; title: [CCA] CUDACachingAllocator always release physical memory h...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",47e160b0755c2c4a80ed35d10fb3bdb8d2df09fd3f27b0f5f36739acc66a8a72
+BUNDLE-1256,bundle:bundle-1256,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: cudnn (40 issues),issue_group,,module: cudnn stale/low urgency batch 2,module: cudnn,"Run one module: cudnn stale-resolution sweep covering 40 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"4145, 4181, 4241, 4542, 4551, 4930, 5280, 12484, 16655, 18536, 19911, 28777, 34977, 36333, 40134, 42545, 45053, 45769, 51044, 51776, 51933, 57921, 62034, 62926, 64025, 70487, 77844, 77955, 80259, 104697, 107751, 109010, 113590, 133780, 134977, 144913, 146096, 149090, 166557, 169146",,40,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: cudnn stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #107751: stale/low urgency; labels: module: cudnn, triaged; title: conv cudnn support integers | issue #34977: stale/low urgency; labels: module: performance, module: cudnn, triaged, module: memory format; title: `conv2d` is slow with specific shapes of channels_last tensors | issue #77844: stale/low urgency; labels: module: cudnn, triaged; title: Conv2D with large different number of input and output channe...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8ed2f9d774a65bba7346cb65132c8429569a14ba403b8182b2b2d169df9d9d69
+BUNDLE-1257,bundle:bundle-1257,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: custom-operators (19 issues),issue_group,,module: custom-operators stale/low urgency batch 1,module: custom-operators,"Run one module: custom-operators stale-resolution sweep covering 19 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"46409, 57392, 97329, 110461, 124645, 127337, 130282, 132534, 139494, 142353, 143466, 144344, 150972, 152720, 155386, 155616, 156622, 161001, 162870",,19,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: custom-operators stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #130282: stale/low urgency; labels: feature, triaged, module: custom-operators, oncall: pt2, module: pt2-dispatcher; title: [custom_ops] We should be able to mark an operator as non-differentiable. | issue #139494: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: custom-operators, actionable, oncall: pt2, module: pt2-dispatcher, vllm-compile, dynamo-triage-jan2025, module: vllm; title: Mutating custom ops slower...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4f827904cf3e4194128113c861d4b85a0fce69d6c0dcb14de676a4efe305499a
+BUNDLE-1258,bundle:bundle-1258,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: data (43 issues),issue_group,,"Review thread: 3 issues - issue #120139: On `Dataset`, `IterableDataset` inheritance",module: data,"Run one module: data stale-resolution sweep covering 43 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"11980, 13053, 46711, 47055, 49180, 49398, 51777, 56360, 64766, 65067, 66116, 68925, 71543, 73141, 74014, 75582, 80134, 88062, 91252, 102368, 106540, 107217, 107854, 108861, 109968, 110156, 113748, 116403, 120139, 122410, 123172, 128015, 128497, 129224, 129225, 131113, 132492, 138957, 148807, 153536, 160849, 164862, 169080",,43,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: data stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"Didn't see but #47055 is related. | n this could solve the nasty https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/blob/v2.2.1/torch/utils/data/sampler.py#L70-L95. On that, see also #122410, #47055. Related Discussions, Issues and Commits #19228, #47055, #23587. Thoughts Thoughts? :) cc @VitalyFedyunin @ejguan @dzhulgakov @ssnl | hinking on this could solve the nasty https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/blob/v2.2.1/torch/utils/dat...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",bee206543c37eca9bda1b0a36c4dafb5dd9ec3eaba51f11171fc65fa50a41ec6
+BUNDLE-1259,bundle:bundle-1259,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: data parallel (67 issues),issue_group,,module: data parallel stale/low urgency batch 4,module: data parallel,"Run one module: data parallel stale-resolution sweep covering 67 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"2312, 7358, 7365, 7457, 7890, 11645, 13447, 14461, 15161, 15260, 16700, 24155, 25514, 27046, 27218, 28275, 31360, 31460, 31478, 31553, 32444, 33081, 33342, 33785, 33800, 34001, 34516, 34941, 35118, 35208, 37246, 37444, 37484, 37814, 38543, 38936, 38940, 40978, 41327, 41681, 42183, 42478, 43120, 43259, 43754, 44938, 45840, 46381, 48714, 50170, 50210, 51385, 52260, 52289, 52597, 53405, 55304, 58218, 62130, 62466, 68931, 70447, 73218, 77576, 83315, 122080, 122568",,67,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: data parallel stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #38543: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: data parallel; title: Make rebuildBucket() to be async in c10d reducer | issue #7890: stale/low urgency; labels: module: nn, triaged, enhancement, module: data parallel; title: [feature request] batch_first of RNN hidden weight for Multi GPU training | issue #37814: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: data parallel; title: Distr...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",98f7140bc5364c44ea16ca401c18c809010f09da1ee6ff0047ffea888aef47f5
+BUNDLE-1260,bundle:bundle-1260,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: dataloader (138 issues),issue_group,,module: dataloader stale/low urgency batch 9,module: dataloader,"Run one module: dataloader stale-resolution sweep covering 138 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"934, 2407, 2724, 3281, 3356, 5231, 6350, 7423, 9171, 9559, 9753, 10165, 11062, 11372, 11633, 11727, 11790, 16901, 18317, 20416, 21016, 21554, 21645, 22136, 22585, 23048, 23720, 24984, 27421, 29804, 30225, 31232, 31657, 31689, 31867, 32034, 32150, 33413, 37409, 40972, 41329, 42402, 42654, 43467, 44528, 44631, 46530, 46802, 47563, 48702, 49727, 49849, 50201, 50831, 50939, 51011, 51418, 51663, 52850, 53337, 54871, 58847, 59438, 61281, 61457, 61503, 61665, 62066, 65198, 65216, 65665, 66223, 66251, 67439, 67602, 68519, 70158, 70386, 71872, 73417, 74337, 75147, 76750, 76887, 77159, 77646, 78921, 78987, 80594, 81412, 82185, 82219, 82583, 85775, 87003, 87955, 91353, 92134, 94131, 96629, 97432, 97498, 98002, 98792, 99584, 100012, 102511, 105799, 106634, 107392, 107443, 110029, 110820, 113600, 116117, 116479, 116558, 117586, 119123, 119281, 123262, 125844, 126620, 127072, 130610, 131631, 131883, 131931, 132919, 135409, 136588, 137882, 142884, 149837, 153594, 154810, 155157, 169078",,138,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: dataloader stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #37409: stale/low urgency; labels: module: dataloader, triaged; title: Compatibility of subset dataset with disabled batch sampling | issue #43467: stale/low urgency; labels: module: multiprocessing, module: dataloader, triaged; title: Data loader struct pack issue(overflow)? | issue #6350: stale/low urgency; labels: module: dataloader, triaged; title: worker assignments in torch.utils.dataloader.py | issue...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",52b3506ad4210ac0252554bcf4a1a5a43d507b89840da9fbc7e4d3c80b5bfa30
+BUNDLE-1261,bundle:bundle-1261,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: dataloader (8 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 4 issues - issue #10386: [feature request] batch_first option in torch.utils.data,module: dataloader,"Run one module: dataloader stale-resolution sweep covering 8 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"7359, 10386, 13023, 49440, 50689, 50940, 53982, 64881",,8,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: dataloader stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,e system to support more flexible data-loading process. Then you should be able to load data directly into GPU. Please checkout out our RFC #49440 | Would be possible after migrating to DataPipes #49440 | _dim = batch_dim) else: self.collate_fn = collate_fn ### OTHER STUFF HERE ### A similar (but more limited in scope) request was advanced in #10386 cc @ssnl @VitalyFedyunin @ejguan | d Simpletransformers. Replacin...,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5ff041fbcecefc3cc235894545707e735ab0d0cc9fd2ede4a4ea08a843025cc2
+BUNDLE-1262,bundle:bundle-1262,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: ddp (81 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 3 issues - issue #64636: [docs or feature request] torchelastic: OOM recovery / skipping batches (e.g. if inf loss or nan gradients),module: ddp,"Run one module: ddp stale-resolution sweep covering 81 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"45943, 46248, 49477, 49716, 49891, 54232, 54351, 54445, 55156, 55876, 56460, 57593, 58522, 58813, 60343, 62862, 63041, 63211, 63290, 64636, 64637, 64905, 65357, 65436, 65637, 68781, 70222, 71330, 71377, 73600, 74148, 74185, 74907, 78157, 78159, 79164, 79171, 79299, 79464, 79542, 79629, 80080, 80420, 83074, 83245, 83320, 84414, 89942, 90742, 95872, 97030, 105499, 109774, 111317, 111552, 112164, 127873, 130932, 149762, 150734, 156680, 158936, 168411, 168412, 168413, 168414, 168415, 168416, 168417, 168418, 168419, 168420, 168421, 168424, 168425, 168426, 168427, 168428, 168429, 168430, 168431",,81,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: ddp stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"Also, OOM recovery and skipping batches: #64636 (per replica or globally) And error / exception / stack trace marshaling Correct implementation of training log logging (both into text jso | sion, static graph, etc Show how to do performance analysis/tuning Show how to do inference in distributed setting and aggregate results as #64905 requests. Recover from batches that cause OOM/inf/nan grads. Overall this will m...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ebfc4affaed82299e322717ec44cf713238626157f7b3cdec86eaefba7449cd1
+BUNDLE-1263,bundle:bundle-1263,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: ddp (17 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 3 issues - issue #168475: TestModule: test/distributed/test_composability.py::ComposabilityTest,module: ddp,"Run one module: ddp stale-resolution sweep covering 17 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"23425, 49321, 168422, 168423, 168434, 168435, 168445, 168446, 168447, 168448, 168449, 168450, 168451, 168452, 168475, 168476, 168477",,17,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: ddp stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,uted/test_composability.py Test class: ComposabilityTest Test name: test_pp_fsdp_unshard_reshard_runtime Defined at line: 389 Parent issue: #168475 Code reference: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/blob/main/test/distributed/test_composability.py cc @sunway513 @jithunnair-amd... | ource file: test/distributed/test_composability.py Test class: ComposabilityTest Test name: test_pp_fsdp Defined at line: 288 Parent i...,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4932e40fcc3384f77678a41d1d4723e1cfbaed35105cb6c651ada161be5a34bd
+BUNDLE-1264,bundle:bundle-1264,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: deadlock (7 issues),issue_group,,module: deadlock stale/low urgency,module: deadlock,"Run one module: deadlock stale-resolution sweep covering 7 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"17745, 26447, 39706, 63441, 68507, 134067, 162154",,7,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: deadlock stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #162154: stale/low urgency; labels: module: multiprocessing, triaged, module: deadlock, module: linear algebra; title: Linear algebra operations hang indefinitely doing nothing when run in subprocesses | issue #134067: stale/low urgency; labels: module: multiprocessing, triaged, module: deadlock; title: subprocess tensor creation gets stuck | issue #17745: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, tria...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b5e334ab17cb2502cad8f252713ddf0439b5949dea3f4012f26c461f67a0dca9
+BUNDLE-1265,bundle:bundle-1265,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: decompositions (12 issues),issue_group,,module: decompositions stale/low urgency,module: decompositions,"Run one module: decompositions stale-resolution sweep covering 12 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"94591, 106375, 113007, 113024, 113329, 117348, 118227, 118642, 134821, 137128, 145094, 147287",,12,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: decompositions stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #137128: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, better-engineering, oncall: pt2, module: dynamic shapes, module: decompositions, module: dynamo; title: Context manager to skip checks inside decompositions | issue #145094: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, oncall: pt2, module: fakeTensor, module: decompositions, module: pt2-dispatcher; title: Tracking issue: Incorrect Meta Strides / Turn On PyDispatcher in Fak...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8c3e8e882444167990a51daede67f16a54f2942be99f82fb2979dd200d4285e9
+BUNDLE-1266,bundle:bundle-1266,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: dependency bug (9 issues),issue_group,,module: dependency bug stale/low urgency,module: dependency bug,"Run one module: dependency bug stale-resolution sweep covering 9 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"21956, 22815, 23721, 26344, 31289, 37004, 53891, 70170, 113905",,9,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: dependency bug stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #22815: stale/low urgency; labels: module: dependency bug, module: internals, triaged, quansight-nack; title: TensorImpl de-virtualization | issue #113905: stale/low urgency; labels: module: dependency bug, triaged; title: Sympy reasoning with true division is broken | issue #21956: stale/low urgency; labels: module: dependency bug, module: multiprocessing, module: nn, triaged, module: initialization; title:...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",fe2d7808692956e55e7a4b5d07d8e515ef1f6c2277ad33124c564b3d6e1123ae
+BUNDLE-1267,bundle:bundle-1267,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: deploy (8 issues),issue_group,,module: deploy stale/low urgency,module: deploy,"Run one module: deploy stale-resolution sweep covering 8 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"56489, 58238, 58876, 73268, 74384, 81568, 82382, 82419",,8,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: deploy stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #56489: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: deploy; title: [torchdeploy] ar: _bz2module.o: No such file or directory | issue #82382: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: deploy; title: Problems in built-from-source pytorch with USE_DEPLOY=1 in Ubuntu | issue #82419: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: deploy; title: The torch::deploy document is not updated | issue #81568: stale/low ur...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4bf9ce64a91e5276ca7cbcaeea3dc90625a114e1ca7cbbdcbb35fd305b1cf3f7
+BUNDLE-1268,bundle:bundle-1268,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: deprecation (32 issues),issue_group,,"Review thread: 6 issues - issue #36524: Drop _stacklevel from argspecs of F.softmax, F.softmin, F.log_softmax (for implicit dim has been long deprecated)",module: deprecation,"Run one module: deprecation stale-resolution sweep covering 32 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"7834, 7900, 9381, 32580, 36524, 37863, 46187, 50273, 50274, 50275, 50276, 50332, 50352, 53124, 54588, 55948, 55951, 55964, 60548, 64038, 65752, 65910, 65936, 71357, 83163, 84290, 84524, 86968, 97014, 117540, 120584, 162782",,32,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: deprecation stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"Related: #36524. As discussed there, this _stacklevel is a remnant of migrating to explicit-only dim and to control warnings about not setting dim and the | Related: #36524 #64038 As discussed there, this _stacklevel is a remnant of migrating to explicit-only dim and to control warnings about not setting dim an | Related: #36524 #64038 As discussed there, this _stacklevel is a remnant of migrating to explicit-only...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5b8b95ae4fa940dde9b23e194677139a87730fb53c36801ec100ce0e19f0c703
+BUNDLE-1269,bundle:bundle-1269,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: derivatives (2 issues),issue_group,,module: derivatives stale/low urgency,module: derivatives,"Run one module: derivatives stale-resolution sweep covering 2 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"22274, 77973",,2,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: derivatives stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #77973: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: derivatives, module: forward ad; title: forward-mode support for ""logically composite"" operators | issue #22274: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, enhancement, module: derivatives; title: second derivatives of unfold",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",92071425790cae75df6a24cc588ff0f734641a8c62dd3dad7f74a97a3ba66f1f
+BUNDLE-1270,bundle:bundle-1270,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: determinism (35 issues),issue_group,,module: determinism stale/low urgency batch 2,module: determinism,"Run one module: determinism stale-resolution sweep covering 35 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"17798, 23151, 27542, 38541, 39134, 51493, 53352, 58471, 59783, 62451, 65049, 72766, 73640, 78249, 82843, 84234, 85096, 88591, 94388, 97236, 98200, 98208, 101246, 107011, 107999, 108341, 110698, 120689, 130968, 140513, 143655, 147595, 155552, 161029, 166114",,35,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: determinism stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #107011: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: determinism, module: pooling; title: max_pool3d_with_indices_backward_cuda does not have a deterministic implementation | issue #101246: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: determinism; title: Tool for identifying where in eager model an operation is nondeterministic | issue #97236: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: determinism, module: m...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7c307daa0307b9f39847ec8eed3315b4917dcd3eafc8a77c4ecbb23dc2536e4f
+BUNDLE-1271,bundle:bundle-1271,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: devicemesh (7 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #119574: Cannot configure dist_timeout when using device_mesh,module: devicemesh,"Run one module: devicemesh stale-resolution sweep covering 7 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"114629, 114632, 119574, 119613, 125358, 142469, 160337",,7,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: devicemesh stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"Is this similar to #119574 | issue #114629: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: DeviceMesh; title: [DeviceMesh] `init_device_mesh` does not support CPU-only | issue #160337: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: DeviceMesh; title: [RFC] Simplify bookkeeping of DeviceMesh slicing, (un)flattening, ... | issue #125358: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module:...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d046b50cfaaaf95acba0e300125b7f7e189b9d48c87238c46a882b3fde4c70d2
+BUNDLE-1272,bundle:bundle-1272,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: devx (27 issues),issue_group,,module: devx stale/low urgency batch 1,module: devx,"Run one module: devx stale-resolution sweep covering 27 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"96585, 99176, 102227, 102559, 102673, 103354, 103482, 105954, 110130, 116539, 116775, 116896, 117647, 118015, 124016, 124222, 125297, 125467, 125626, 127788, 131357, 141299, 144890, 147387, 152190, 153273, 167558",,27,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: devx stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #167558: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: devx; title: per_page=1000 doesn't work in hud.pytorch.org | issue #152190: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: devx; title: HUD Dashboard sort by perf speedup doesn't do anything | issue #153273: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: devx; title: Auto format lint not making suggestions | issue #102559: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, enh...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",153b4646f803109228cbb0fa08b0fdf803a48e1322ca7d7f28491dcea5407495
+BUNDLE-1273,bundle:bundle-1273,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: dispatch (42 issues),issue_group,,module: dispatch stale/low urgency batch 3,module: dispatch,"Run one module: dispatch stale-resolution sweep covering 42 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"28532, 29844, 32549, 32937, 35038, 35040, 42818, 42858, 42902, 43429, 44657, 44809, 45203, 54082, 54096, 54283, 54356, 54614, 57326, 57369, 57957, 60997, 65426, 65825, 66563, 67279, 76175, 78519, 78743, 81722, 85122, 85815, 102423, 109724, 112666, 114440, 119971, 124083, 124630, 140322, 148029, 164872",,42,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: dispatch stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #54356: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: dispatch; title: Generate delegates for all non-structured kernels | issue #54283: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: dispatch; title: Split VariableTypeManual.cpp | issue #54096: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: dispatch, better-engineering, module: distance functions; title: cdist skip for manual backward is kind of janky | issue #4480...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",afb57fa4f1899cefd998a80d7df883515e45ece52f1d865f60c9d11b0bd6497a
+BUNDLE-1274,bundle:bundle-1274,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: distance functions (14 issues),issue_group,,module: distance functions stale/low urgency,module: distance functions,"Run one module: distance functions stale-resolution sweep covering 14 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"11202, 15918, 25156, 28119, 37363, 37408, 37734, 46169, 48306, 49426, 52005, 61509, 69524, 70040",,14,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: distance functions stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #61509: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, function request, module: distance functions; title: [feature request] Exact euclidean distance transform | issue #69524: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: distance functions; title: [feature request] Accepting python scalar inputs for torch.minimum/torch.maximum and friends | issue #70040: stale/low urgency; labels: module: docs, triaged, module: distanc...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",60bf98f5e3c0c45aaedb8be97c5bd22d9e034aeed84c798d6b5cef22e4fca214
+BUNDLE-1275,bundle:bundle-1275,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: distributed_tool (2 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #115305: torchrun to support NUMA affiinity,module: distributed_tool,"Run one module: distributed_tool stale-resolution sweep covering 2 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"115305, 152822",,2,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: distributed_tool stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,Is it possible to consider this option in conjunction with #115305,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2d8caff8f70e106354b294490e49d8d59402920200029d7feb64238d9d639a3a
+BUNDLE-1276,bundle:bundle-1276,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: distributions (105 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #139019: Stabilizing the Kumaraswamy Distribution,module: distributions,"Run one module: distributions stale-resolution sweep covering 105 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"1747, 3364, 4159, 4574, 7857, 11937, 12716, 12895, 13811, 15288, 15738, 16291, 18730, 20343, 20682, 21553, 21673, 25783, 26334, 28441, 29044, 32406, 32552, 33898, 34949, 36036, 37162, 38474, 38611, 38612, 38613, 39178, 41284, 42407, 43250, 45115, 46350, 48273, 49291, 50616, 52298, 52625, 52973, 54394, 56030, 56881, 59822, 60916, 61727, 62178, 65811, 67390, 68746, 69281, 69467, 69469, 71689, 71951, 72545, 73070, 73585, 73826, 73848, 73916, 75173, 76030, 76160, 76709, 83564, 85375, 87468, 89684, 91574, 91863, 92260, 95129, 95548, 96494, 97156, 97656, 98939, 99630, 102811, 107821, 108152, 110366, 113579, 119524, 121220, 122021, 122185, 127387, 130950, 133754, 136750, 139019, 142825, 144660, 145729, 147048, 148247, 149718, 164061, 166243, 173912",,105,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: distributions stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"enjoy the benefit of yielding nan's in the exact spots without having to manually mask for entries in which $a&lt;1, b&lt;1, a=b=1$. Issue #139019 might be related. Versions Collecting environment information... PyTorch version: 2.10.0+cpu Is debug build: False CUDA used to bu... | hat exposes an .rsample() method is available in this repo. Moreover I can see that in the original Von Mises distribution feature req...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",289c3eebd5245a7027b4adaa81b244ed373db255b314849983ca78e7c631edec
+BUNDLE-1277,bundle:bundle-1277,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: distributions (11 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 3 issues - issue #11389: [distributions] Torch distribution samplers slow on expanded parameters,module: distributions,"Run one module: distributions stale-resolution sweep covering 11 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"11389, 18906, 19248, 29981, 30968, 50034, 72258, 74771, 84625, 90663, 91300",,11,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: distributions stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"This appears to be an especially important instance of #11389. This refactoring will also be necessary for #18906 | orch and to use it to increase precision in the sampling of Dirichlet/Beta distributions. This feature proposal is in part related to issue #84625. This issue reveals that for small parameter values, the beta distribution behaves incorrectly. More generally, the Dirichlet dist... | related #50034, fi...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",17530bb9ff7d169b36f050fed6cc30a0ff9de5d14fd0640a81542986a6ef4462
+BUNDLE-1278,bundle:bundle-1278,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: dlpack (5 issues),issue_group,,module: dlpack stale/low urgency,module: dlpack,"Run one module: dlpack stale-resolution sweep covering 5 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"82610, 82823, 96318, 136250, 148306",,5,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: dlpack stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #148306: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: vmap, module: dlpack, module: functorch; title: torch.vmap incompatibility with DLPack functions | issue #136250: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: dlpack; title: A question about `getDLDevice` | issue #96318: stale/low urgency; labels: feature, triaged, module: dlpack; title: Support managed memory backed dlpack with torch.from_dlpack | issue #8...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a332cfc44b6f8a1cf72114cc4f9562cf159df41ba33bb0409924f254be591bca
+BUNDLE-1279,bundle:bundle-1279,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: doc infra (39 issues),issue_group,,"Review thread: 8 issues - issue #106959: `tensor.repeat` quirks: has no `torch.` variant, no `out=` variant, no inplace variant | `torch.tile` also does not have `out=` variant and uses `dims=` instead of `dim=`",module: doc infra,"Run one module: doc infra stale-resolution sweep covering 39 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"4954, 6662, 18095, 19263, 20183, 27708, 27843, 31458, 38010, 38012, 39007, 39836, 41499, 44593, 44719, 48287, 48465, 49873, 49874, 51575, 52256, 52747, 54677, 55751, 57759, 61585, 62446, 64541, 64711, 68616, 71210, 71760, 74152, 84932, 85351, 101369, 106959, 127530, 154613",,39,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: doc infra stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"We should solve this while/by fixing #61585. | Related to #61585. In addition to norm, split and unique in torch/functional.py also do not support axis alias. | Related: #68616 , #18095 | tensor.repeat. torch.tile also does not have inplace/out-variants and uses inconsistent arg name dims instead of dim, same as flip/roll :( #68616 | Originally in #18095 (comment): @vadimkantorov: Works: https://pytorch.org/docs/s...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",24227cf8df4234b0d2b49825b058eb59f6062b531fa8962ca2b15a514f6a8891
+BUNDLE-1280,bundle:bundle-1280,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: docker (22 issues),issue_group,,module: docker stale/low urgency batch 1,module: docker,"Run one module: docker stale-resolution sweep covering 22 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"5070, 12773, 17286, 32030, 39444, 48083, 58386, 60932, 61030, 69685, 72784, 73920, 79604, 87196, 87701, 103832, 112876, 115421, 118508, 119843, 146701, 150049",,22,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: docker stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #150049: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, oncall: releng, triaged, module: docker; title: 2.7 test docker image has NCCL with older CUDA | issue #146701: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: docker; title: Unable to Import PyTorch After Upgrade in Docker Environment | issue #73920: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: docker; title: pytorch/pytorch:1.8.1-cuda10.2-cudnn7-devel doc...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",17f9e5ba141a8deda26f78d116fd40028bddac4ce0cdcfd90cbd2bbe73e87717
+BUNDLE-1281,bundle:bundle-1281,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: docs (116 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #69033: Lazy Tensor Core Documentation Out-of-Date,module: docs,"Run one module: docs stale-resolution sweep covering 116 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"4474, 8069, 14318, 16257, 16268, 21290, 21518, 21682, 22220, 22232, 22494, 23054, 23072, 23079, 23787, 25991, 26338, 28906, 36091, 36217, 40967, 41571, 46253, 47917, 51623, 52262, 54209, 54393, 56136, 56262, 64006, 66806, 68009, 68352, 69033, 71552, 72112, 76510, 77053, 82430, 83244, 90633, 96073, 97118, 97597, 97966, 98409, 98499, 98566, 98600, 98805, 98871, 99310, 99316, 100347, 100584, 102437, 102515, 103640, 103846, 103847, 103960, 104033, 104154, 104872, 104962, 105460, 107130, 107703, 108197, 108522, 110084, 111621, 112585, 112587, 112588, 112600, 112638, 112641, 112644, 112646, 112715, 113186, 113187, 113188, 113190, 113192, 114364, 116569, 120255, 120407, 120735, 123113, 123344, 124395, 126518, 127031, 127497, 128495, 129050, 129122, 130254, 130448, 134691, 138017, 140296, 141277, 141417, 141616, 145357, 145907, 146086, 149284, 150252, 152381, 181725",,116,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: docs stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"ith 1 in the graph before parsing. Is there a way around this issue, or another way to parse the generated IR? Note: @wconstab mentioned in #69033 (comment) that ""manually extracting the IR from lazy tracing and feeding it to a compiler isn't really the envisioned use case for... | in the wrapper / functional layer, not a difference in the math. The same comparison on CPU shows ~1× (no gap). This is not a duplicat...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c7345a1d9c54a5e27f2fda3dac200828e182315d625747131d8531a3dcbe3785
+BUNDLE-1282,bundle:bundle-1282,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: docs (140 issues),issue_group,,module: docs stale/low urgency batch 26,module: docs,"Run one module: docs stale-resolution sweep covering 140 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"3920, 4400, 4530, 5524, 6165, 9882, 10735, 11551, 12532, 14790, 15259, 15298, 19160, 20151, 20935, 21779, 22755, 23305, 26990, 27687, 28110, 28558, 28721, 28757, 28938, 29021, 29202, 29510, 29800, 29860, 30162, 30380, 30384, 30403, 30533, 30762, 31048, 31321, 32087, 32141, 32767, 32872, 33055, 34063, 34210, 34300, 34412, 34833, 35766, 36059, 36307, 36386, 37416, 37440, 37441, 38595, 38639, 38720, 39130, 39399, 39426, 39619, 39705, 39799, 40417, 40969, 40971, 41106, 41148, 41282, 41392, 42112, 42159, 42177, 42188, 42228, 42447, 42529, 42539, 42729, 42774, 42829, 42830, 43109, 43245, 43352, 43503, 44179, 44415, 44552, 44917, 45483, 45717, 45767, 46597, 46819, 47357, 48466, 48648, 48649, 49475, 50076, 50094, 50118, 50890, 51008, 51197, 51256, 52688, 53360, 53477, 53642, 54213, 54368, 54387, 55450, 56328, 56329, 57112, 57712, 58395, 58585, 59627, 60096, 60400, 60561, 88327, 127886, 127915, 127917, 142290, 149393, 153531, 156072, 156258, 157101, 158895, 159234, 159536, 159886",,140,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: docs stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #30384: stale/low urgency; labels: module: docs, triaged; title: Docs missing link to torch.__config__ | issue #30162: stale/low urgency; labels: module: docs, triaged; title: [docs] Newline / whitespace / comma missing in formula for PoissonNLLLoss | issue #29860: stale/low urgency; labels: module: docs, module: serialization, triaged; title: torch.save/load shows raw path on the pickle_module arg | issue #...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9885f68319831a3c29abb3a564a8b7abd947504edc978ce004c71c3da44db75e
+BUNDLE-1283,bundle:bundle-1283,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: docs (132 issues),issue_group,,module: docs stale/low urgency batch 17,module: docs,"Run one module: docs stale-resolution sweep covering 132 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"8153, 10377, 16014, 16523, 16737, 16804, 16896, 16899, 17612, 18434, 19652, 20359, 20375, 20481, 20641, 21567, 28794, 36426, 37063, 39716, 42303, 47201, 47351, 53261, 55752, 56396, 57272, 60372, 60381, 60520, 60843, 61515, 62162, 62343, 62399, 62606, 62989, 63140, 63207, 63257, 63559, 64133, 64138, 64292, 64384, 64539, 65069, 65166, 65526, 65702, 65739, 65949, 66364, 66907, 66921, 67482, 68017, 68058, 68169, 69363, 69408, 69442, 69984, 70265, 70419, 70454, 70498, 70970, 71076, 71366, 71633, 72240, 72788, 73007, 73699, 74022, 74937, 75510, 75659, 75737, 76138, 76338, 76627, 77454, 78742, 79518, 80771, 80940, 82041, 82081, 82377, 82802, 82960, 83060, 83135, 83234, 84140, 84537, 85558, 86020, 86563, 87388, 87494, 87902, 88192, 88423, 88992, 90114, 90485, 90832, 91210, 91618, 91842, 94654, 95462, 95953, 96523, 97026, 98456, 142840, 161509, 162711, 163789, 165578, 165621, 165626, 166823, 167229, 167721, 167950, 168128, 171401",,132,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: docs stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #63207: stale/low urgency; labels: module: docs, triaged; title: document our compatibility with upstream packages (e.g. languages, compilers, tools) | issue #62989: stale/low urgency; labels: module: docs, triaged; title: Doc page for functions with overload is not properly indented | issue #62606: stale/low urgency; labels: module: docs, triaged; title: Guidance on where to add documentation | issue #20359...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",bf9fa5582e22b1ab5e09d2706055d16562e2c09fe927e44d65fe7427627042b1
+BUNDLE-1284,bundle:bundle-1284,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: docs (28 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 5 issues - issue #107112: from_blob python api,module: docs,"Run one module: docs stale-resolution sweep covering 28 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"5405, 5740, 20117, 25032, 25310, 30387, 34646, 34649, 38767, 42843, 45901, 49949, 49992, 50802, 56440, 56975, 59526, 59566, 59629, 71249, 71329, 78878, 80208, 100904, 104623, 105457, 107112, 115821",,28,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: docs stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"My usecase is this: #34646 I tried a few things to simplify the code. One of them was creating a typed storage, and then trying some generic method to create a tensor | Can Storage.from_buffer be used now for this purpose? #30387 and I wonder what happens about freeing the memory. pytorch/torch/csrc/generic/StorageMethods.cpp Line 87 in 74ce3a0 static PyObject * THPS | Related: #30387, I used this to convert a byt...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",846d9b657ad68eb08e8c03e853dcab6ddfe8ba8602d8239251df0465d789b467
+BUNDLE-1285,bundle:bundle-1285,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: docs (6 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #38622: Clarification for usage of negative loss with optim.lr_scheduler.ReduceLROnPlateau,module: docs,"Run one module: docs stale-resolution sweep covering 6 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"29028, 29116, 34306, 38622, 47513, 50962",,6,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: docs stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"ogous for the case mode='max' and threshold_mode == 'rel' return a - best > self.threshold * abs(best) This behavior was already noticed in #38622 which believes this to be an error in the documentation rather than the code. cc @jlin27 @mruberry @vincentqb | Related about 1d conv_tbc: #34306 | Following up on #29028 (comment), there exists torch.masked_fill_ but cannot be accessed through out argument, which makes...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",313c3b8129e9d906be7f84d13270b74e238995c3e39bff9cb3366dca8a5e2016
+BUNDLE-1286,bundle:bundle-1286,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: dtensor (33 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #152406: [DTensor] Calling .item() on DTensor with Partial placement results in local value,module: dtensor,"Run one module: dtensor stale-resolution sweep covering 33 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"90585, 105213, 106566, 113761, 115058, 116101, 117728, 118461, 119343, 119714, 122485, 124989, 124990, 126795, 133221, 134462, 136946, 137392, 144109, 147570, 147814, 147980, 148269, 150336, 151858, 152406, 152717, 157545, 157976, 164891, 166638, 168304, 170936",,33,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: dtensor stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"Seems duplicate to #152406. | issue #150336: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: dtensor; title: [parallelize_module] uneven sharding + use_local_output breaks | issue #148269: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: dtensor; title: Should DTensor support `Shard()` placement without dim requirement? | issue #147980: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distribute...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1c6f01f52b507c4e3d365d8b18f837a961bcc5b7db128443f9541fa4d7c5c0ff
+BUNDLE-1287,bundle:bundle-1287,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: dynamic shapes (37 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 3 issues - issue #124572: Variant of slice that doesn't perform clamp behavior,module: dynamic shapes,"Run one module: dynamic shapes stale-resolution sweep covering 37 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"41625, 43125, 107873, 113232, 117681, 119549, 121286, 123765, 124572, 124686, 126738, 126846, 128053, 128150, 128548, 130432, 130534, 135255, 136119, 136605, 136681, 137217, 138813, 141594, 141675, 141934, 144068, 144969, 147264, 148564, 149743, 154489, 159942, 163785, 165421, 165912, 166186",,37,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: dynamic shapes stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"If you do this, might also be good to make public the classical slice method in general (narrow does not support the step argument) :) #41625 | UPD: Original title: ""slice(None) and maybe slice in general is not supported in JIT"" Originally reported in #41625 (comment) def tensor_dim_slice(tensor, dim, dim_slice): return tensor[(dim if dim >= 0 else dim + tensor.dim()) * (slice(None), ) + (dim_sl | issue #149743:...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",bcbfb1ae7720c9d87bbce8f6eaa15df6cb040f74b72bde2117b33b7bc909ff13
+BUNDLE-1288,bundle:bundle-1288,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: dynamo (85 issues),issue_group,,module: dynamo stale/low urgency batch 5,module: dynamo,"Run one module: dynamo stale-resolution sweep covering 85 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"89158, 93480, 93511, 93737, 93743, 93923, 96396, 101107, 101117, 102063, 102878, 102898, 109309, 111674, 112727, 114353, 115122, 115526, 116013, 116575, 117321, 118058, 118390, 118884, 121333, 124749, 126360, 126566, 128095, 128149, 129482, 129937, 129942, 130464, 133040, 133117, 134249, 136833, 137811, 138226, 138786, 138800, 140416, 140437, 141125, 141422, 141589, 141690, 141964, 142171, 142395, 142414, 144478, 146930, 146964, 147597, 148103, 148106, 148144, 148289, 148828, 149062, 149872, 149906, 149908, 149956, 149962, 149970, 150864, 151015, 151251, 151776, 152829, 152869, 152994, 155266, 155825, 157075, 160071, 160508, 161105, 161330, 162375, 164062, 167257",,85,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: dynamo stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #93737: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, enhancement, oncall: pt2, module: dynamo; title: Improve handling of generators | issue #144478: stale/low urgency; labels: feature, triaged, oncall: pt2, module: dynamo; title: [dynamo] Support using UserDefinedFunction as argument (as_proxy). | issue #142414: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, oncall: pt2, module: dynamo; title: [dynamo] Tracking issue for multi...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",482fad90d1b71cf3c5207da6fc687f8393ba036e65d1fdce11f787d4328f428e
+BUNDLE-1289,bundle:bundle-1289,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: edge cases (80 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #157431: ``torch.quantile`` edge case,module: edge cases,"Run one module: edge cases stale-resolution sweep covering 80 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"64947, 73180, 73181, 73182, 73504, 73840, 77514, 78122, 78125, 78126, 78127, 78128, 78129, 78130, 78131, 78153, 78255, 83175, 83624, 84560, 85791, 86918, 87551, 88941, 88943, 89393, 89420, 91552, 91553, 91556, 91557, 91593, 92835, 94115, 94590, 96236, 96613, 97087, 97088, 101653, 102894, 113370, 114216, 120986, 126658, 126659, 126776, 126777, 131273, 134183, 134244, 135048, 135050, 135330, 136699, 136717, 137484, 141203, 141449, 141450, 144643, 146570, 149013, 153187, 153234, 153329, 153337, 154311, 154474, 156020, 157431, 158412, 158419, 159333, 159363, 160856, 161524, 161853, 162489, 169058",,80,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: edge cases stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"🐛 Describe the bug It seems anyway that this function would benefit from rewriting (#64947), but here's a small edge case problem. >>> tensor = torch.tensor([0.0, 1.0, 2.0]) >>> torch.quantile(tensor, 0.5000001, interpolation=""mid | issue #88941: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: linear algebra, actionable, module: sanitizers, module: edge cases; title: `torch.linalg.lstsq` Trigger RuntimeError under Und...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8788a2935e132f3006535815c39967931d8af46e492826bf396bef37a855f0cc
+BUNDLE-1290,bundle:bundle-1290,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: elastic (15 issues),issue_group,,module: elastic stale/low urgency batch 1,module: elastic,"Run one module: elastic stale-resolution sweep covering 15 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"60911, 63223, 63846, 73380, 85300, 99684, 109747, 113515, 114097, 122694, 124906, 130656, 132951, 147563, 158326",,15,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: elastic stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #158326: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: elastic; title: Support for etcd v3 api as rendezvous backend | issue #147563: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: elastic; title: torch.distributed.elastic.multiprocessing.start_process description does not reflect API | issue #114097: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: elasti...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a635b28b73cde960daff17f62fc635b8b2744fe1cfd66d81bdccad974a09ca87
+BUNDLE-1291,bundle:bundle-1291,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: embedding (10 issues),issue_group,,module: embedding stale/low urgency,module: embedding,"Run one module: embedding stale-resolution sweep covering 10 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"51003, 52851, 54861, 55549, 55981, 56064, 66750, 66751, 123119, 127422",,10,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: embedding stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #123119: stale/low urgency; labels: module: nn, triaged, module: embedding, module: mps; title: `nn.Embedding` behaves differently on CPU (fails) and MPS (fails not) | issue #127422: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: embedding, module: vulkan; title: index_select op not implemented on Vulkan backend | issue #55549: stale/low urgency; labels: module: nn, triaged, module: embedding; title: `embedding...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b16b66f6e6aea642ea6b8eea85096e8c1bfa14ccbe6f8626c1375e89c841d274
+BUNDLE-1292,bundle:bundle-1292,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: empty tensor (2 issues),issue_group,,module: empty tensor stale/low urgency,module: empty tensor,"Run one module: empty tensor stale-resolution sweep covering 2 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"131148, 153327",,2,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: empty tensor stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #153327: stale/low urgency; labels: module: error checking, triaged, actionable, module: empty tensor; title: FPE when calling `torch.pixel_shuffle()` with empty tensors and large upscale_factor | issue #131148: stale/low urgency; labels: module: error checking, triaged, actionable, module: empty tensor; title: The empty 1D or more D tensor for `median()/nanmedian()` with the deepest `dim` gets errors, not g...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4afe82a1fdd95a27486e9aafca263141f17dab426b7254a3ce3164de5b87c42e
+BUNDLE-1293,bundle:bundle-1293,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: error checking (75 issues),issue_group,,module: error checking stale/low urgency batch 4,module: error checking,"Run one module: error checking stale-resolution sweep covering 75 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"4622, 10298, 11426, 13782, 18933, 20056, 22513, 24031, 24354, 24463, 26354, 27936, 34880, 37457, 38202, 39224, 40237, 44704, 47610, 49224, 53391, 54135, 55161, 56330, 58380, 58657, 60277, 62865, 63282, 65375, 66868, 69800, 69912, 71059, 71078, 71084, 71541, 71636, 72332, 73638, 74295, 75733, 76362, 77415, 78929, 81459, 87031, 89218, 89254, 89381, 89394, 89418, 94704, 95590, 95756, 99265, 99351, 105629, 105860, 106124, 120973, 121226, 126758, 130608, 135640, 135648, 138192, 138418, 149724, 152437, 159740, 162712, 164878, 171536, 174986",,75,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: error checking stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #65375: stale/low urgency; labels: module: error checking, triaged, better-engineering; title: Make python_error use c10/util/Exception.h C++ backtrace machinery | issue #58380: stale/low urgency; labels: module: error checking, triaged, module: linear algebra; title: Clarity of error message in einsum regressed in performance improvements | issue #63282: stale/low urgency; labels: module: error checking, mo...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",15c46a710b5a53e46b3a0cb6134ec25f887384fad63b741e953d02a41bd4b026
+BUNDLE-1294,bundle:bundle-1294,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: faketensor (4 issues),issue_group,,module: faketensor stale/low urgency,module: faketensor,"Run one module: faketensor stale-resolution sweep covering 4 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"106130, 113456, 115362, 164732",,4,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: faketensor stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #106130: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: fakeTensor; title: torch._subclasses.fake_tensor.DynamicOutputShapeException: aten.nonzero.default | issue #164732: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, oncall: pt2, module: fakeTensor, module: functorch, module: pt2-dispatcher; title: Fake tensor leakage in aot_autograd by itself | issue #115362: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: fakeTensor, modu...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0d9295e1ae811c9e44a834230ced0a41a9824e9045cfafa0cee4415f146c9aaf
+BUNDLE-1295,bundle:bundle-1295,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: fft (18 issues),issue_group,,module: fft stale/low urgency batch 1,module: fft,"Run one module: fft stale-resolution sweep covering 18 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"50552, 51965, 61211, 61213, 66305, 69627, 87353, 96518, 99515, 106622, 113525, 114581, 114672, 128044, 145943, 145944, 165425, 165739",,18,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: fft stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #165739: stale/low urgency; labels: low priority, triaged, module: NaNs and Infs, module: fft; title: Inconsistent in `torch.fft.irfft` and `torch.fft.ifftn` for complex64 inputs containing `Inf` | issue #165425: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: fft, module: flop counter; title: Support FFT operations in FLOP counter | issue #145944: stale/low urgency; labels: module: onnx, triaged, module: fft; t...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a3592c8691958acc029c53b890ace1dbcd0229d8b2c7faeb480bd47d384d579f
+BUNDLE-1296,bundle:bundle-1296,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: first class dims (2 issues),issue_group,,module: first class dims stale/low urgency,module: first class dims,"Run one module: first class dims stale-resolution sweep covering 2 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"111525, 120572",,2,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: first class dims stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #120572: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, tensor subclass, module: functorch, module: first class dims; title: FCD and tensor subclasses | issue #111525: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: functorch, module: first class dims; title: Functorch FCD breaks with tensor subclasses",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",946d278c83cb1502f9bab00cf1c5620d96992d2800ae9554596caf82f51372be
+BUNDLE-1297,bundle:bundle-1297,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: flaky-tests (15 issues),issue_group,,module: flaky-tests stale/low urgency batch 1,module: flaky-tests,"Run one module: flaky-tests stale-resolution sweep covering 15 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"8044, 9563, 14478, 16458, 17354, 20488, 59875, 61614, 62602, 87087, 88883, 88902, 146307, 149016, 160387",,15,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: flaky-tests stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #149016: stale/low urgency; labels: module: rocm, triaged, module: flaky-tests, skipped, oncall: pt2, module: inductor, rocm-skipped-tests; title: DISABLED test_var_mean_tile_reduction_True_dynamic_shapes_cuda (__main__.DynamicShapesGPUTests) | issue #160387: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: flaky-tests, skipped, module: unknown; title: DISABLED RecordDebugHandles.Basic (__main__.test_jit) | issue...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",fccd55055f6457d415015736425fd82778fa6e6ddabdca0ffb24d7dadf805497
+BUNDLE-1298,bundle:bundle-1298,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: flex attention (5 issues),issue_group,,module: flex attention stale/low urgency,module: flex attention,"Run one module: flex attention stale-resolution sweep covering 5 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"139131, 144810, 151695, 157015, 163428",,5,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: flex attention stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #144810: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, oncall: pt2, module: functorch, module: higher order operators, module: pt2-dispatcher, module: flex attention; title: Support torch.func.grad for Flex Attention | issue #157015: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, oncall: pt2, module: higher order operators, module: pt2-dispatcher, module: flex attention; title: [WIP][RFC] Compilable flex_attention + Context Para...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5ad492ff2dca2f4c879ec2297bf2995f770739257e0b3a5b2daa605117209927
+BUNDLE-1299,bundle:bundle-1299,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: floatx (formerly float8) (15 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 3 issues - issue #168819: TestModule: test/test_scaled_matmul_cuda.py::TestFP8Matmul,module: floatx (formerly float8),"Run one module: floatx (formerly float8) stale-resolution sweep covering 15 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"107087, 113831, 123761, 128257, 129803, 130359, 131196, 132624, 141749, 154028, 160651, 162458, 168819, 168820, 168823",,15,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: floatx (formerly float8) stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,est/test_scaled_matmul_cuda.py Test class: TestFP8Matmul Test name: test_scaled_mm_vs_emulated_row_wise Defined at line: 1267 Parent issue: #168819 Code reference: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/blob/main/test/test_scaled_matmul_cuda.py cc @sunway513 @jithunnair-amd @pruth... | st_scaled_matmul_cuda.py Test class: TestFP8Matmul Test name: test_blockwise_mxfp8_nvfp4_mxfp4_numerics Defined at line: 1894 Parent i...,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0f86e18af467dc1ab79f28e2c53e2ddb8204c6df066651d2cad6c44147be9e78
+BUNDLE-1300,bundle:bundle-1300,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: flop counter (4 issues),issue_group,,module: flop counter stale/low urgency,module: flop counter,"Run one module: flop counter stale-resolution sweep covering 4 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"144001, 144564, 145947, 165570",,4,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: flop counter stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #144564: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, dependency issue, module: flop counter; title: Tabulate not official dependency of PyTorch but needed by features like FlopCounterMode | issue #165570: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: flop counter; title: Add support for element-wise operations to flop counter | issue #145947: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: flop counte...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c6dc5a06541be497a92184f3ba3b90314eac642180f92fc69657f8986a72f39a
+BUNDLE-1301,bundle:bundle-1301,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: forward ad (15 issues),issue_group,,module: forward ad stale/low urgency,module: forward ad,"Run one module: forward ad stale-resolution sweep covering 15 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"58833, 68041, 75503, 75652, 78961, 91280, 92072, 93982, 94085, 94208, 98164, 104472, 113368, 129176, 146901",,15,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: forward ad stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #93982: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: forward ad; title: `linalg.lstsq` fails the gradient computation in forward mode | issue #146901: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: forward ad, module: sdpa; title: Trying to use forward AD with _scaled_dot_product_efficient_attention | issue #129176: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: forward ad; title: extending forward-mode AD docs sho...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f72b21f56f0d14f7e07268e0c7238b317fa70eb7b3e1189084cb34c6bdfa5ae1
+BUNDLE-1302,bundle:bundle-1302,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: fsdp (45 issues),issue_group,,"Review thread: 2 issues - issue #134191: AdamW is CPU-bottlenecked with FSDP2, with slow foreach kernels",module: fsdp,"Run one module: fsdp stale-resolution sweep covering 45 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"66335, 71404, 77724, 98484, 98808, 101335, 101999, 103962, 104252, 104479, 107909, 108023, 108190, 109002, 109440, 117601, 118095, 118245, 119431, 120879, 125738, 133849, 134191, 140514, 148257, 148504, 148756, 148831, 149100, 150096, 150140, 150799, 151030, 154272, 154836, 154960, 158819, 159169, 159498, 168402, 168403, 168404, 168405, 168406, 168407",,45,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: fsdp stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"Some prior discussion #134191 | issue #148504: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: fsdp; title: [FSDP2] improve error msg for duplicate wraps | issue #148257: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: fsdp; title: [FSDP2] HSDP with globally sharded fp32 weights and optimizer states | issue #109002: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module:...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",eb00e4a5ae2c9db2fd1713475934e7eade77da3b420ad8169561c5100a8f973c
+BUNDLE-1303,bundle:bundle-1303,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: functional ux (1 issue),issue_group,,#104768 Support for `eval` in functional_call,module: functional ux,"Run one module: functional ux stale-resolution sweep covering 1 issue: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,104768,,1,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: functional ux stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #104768: stale/low urgency; labels: module: nn, triaged, module: functional UX; title: Support for `eval` in functional_call",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d8ff121470d71cff38e806b7a24a3ea3170ac1457bc6ed55631ec6c5eb29231f
+BUNDLE-1304,bundle:bundle-1304,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: functionalization (17 issues),issue_group,,module: functionalization stale/low urgency batch 1,module: functionalization,"Run one module: functionalization stale-resolution sweep covering 17 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"79867, 81385, 83923, 87019, 87571, 89068, 90992, 92912, 94471, 97852, 107961, 115706, 120585, 130021, 135382, 159784, 165409",,17,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: functionalization stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #165409: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, has workaround, module: functionalization, oncall: pt2, module: pt2-dispatcher; title: [torch.compile][fullgraph][functionalization] In-place op on overlapped view from unfold fails: “tensor being mutated has internal overlap” (eager OK) | issue #159784: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: functionalization, oncall: pt2, module: functorch, module: pt2-disp...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ef176ba20ca2dac21cc6d5d3a1637976d2eb616c29b3b37dfce59507c95cfd3e
+BUNDLE-1305,bundle:bundle-1305,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: functorch (76 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #105494: workaround for using vmap when .item() is being used internally,module: functorch,"Run one module: functorch stale-resolution sweep covering 76 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"85533, 85656, 86298, 86819, 87222, 91199, 91244, 91509, 91810, 93231, 93317, 93319, 93523, 95718, 96337, 96855, 97283, 97286, 97395, 98338, 98515, 98557, 98724, 99287, 99311, 99558, 99836, 100801, 101073, 101241, 101415, 102085, 102109, 103161, 103329, 103879, 104704, 105326, 105494, 105912, 105982, 107125, 109938, 111311, 112013, 112459, 114604, 114605, 115342, 116102, 118861, 124423, 127750, 129459, 132052, 134038, 134606, 136357, 139241, 140704, 144850, 145262, 149250, 149609, 149620, 149694, 149788, 149804, 151113, 151591, 152295, 153861, 158169, 161296, 162346, 166511",,76,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: functorch stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"loop. Apparently, torch.arange() internally uses .item() and vmap cannot handle that. Is there any workaround? This issue seems similar to #124423, but it is not exactly the same. cc @zou3519 @Chillee @samdow @kshitij12345 @janeyx99 | Hello! I'm facing a similar issue and reported in #134606. Are there any updates on this? | wargs) RuntimeError: Cannot access data pointer of Tensor that doesn't have storage The ab...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",31228993964cd606002605f1441b8461176fd7a94216f3cd8640acbd5336cfc1
+BUNDLE-1306,bundle:bundle-1306,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: fx (127 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #79715: [FX] TypeError when tracing cat taking split's output as input,module: fx,"Run one module: fx stale-resolution sweep covering 127 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"43659, 43679, 44049, 44851, 45220, 45534, 45683, 46210, 47481, 48209, 48813, 49265, 49618, 50143, 50177, 52022, 52538, 52564, 53026, 53121, 53732, 53794, 53935, 54071, 54503, 54574, 54785, 54913, 54979, 55394, 55395, 55397, 55399, 55400, 55401, 55544, 55668, 55694, 56688, 56778, 56862, 56938, 57124, 58051, 58402, 60069, 61246, 62395, 63076, 63490, 63815, 64497, 64997, 65096, 66197, 67030, 67350, 67364, 67402, 67543, 67662, 68190, 68301, 68513, 69025, 69095, 69577, 69804, 70449, 70892, 71715, 71919, 73304, 73469, 73992, 74058, 74218, 74842, 74901, 75090, 75342, 76186, 77016, 78201, 78435, 79307, 79715, 80172, 80427, 80903, 81229, 82727, 83292, 84316, 84415, 84515, 84840, 87777, 89421, 91293, 94374, 95276, 98942, 99023, 99407, 103060, 104593, 105445, 107538, 107678, 109386, 109539, 112775, 113034, 125581, 127282, 130701, 139163, 139185, 139876, 147884, 150922, 153930, 156733, 165277, 165634, 169797",,127,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: fx stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"behavior should be that the tracing for both of the following modules should complete without emitting any error messages. Related issues: #79715 #34294 (Seems to contain an (incomplete) fix?) #43248 Code for reproducing the issue: The graph = tracer.trace(nested_cat) line com... | issue #54913: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: fx; title: FX tracer doesn't support returning a new instance of `object` su...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",973ce65977e996b07e1cb864ebe5523779f76bd828f288196f77dde73333fc0f
+BUNDLE-1307,bundle:bundle-1307,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: fx (12 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 4 issues - issue #44901: for loop can't be symbolically traced,module: fx,"Run one module: fx stale-resolution sweep covering 12 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"37334, 44901, 45682, 45685, 51803, 53534, 54602, 62021, 67970, 70485, 78487, 101110",,12,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: fx stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"Hi @jamesr66a With custom Tracer, the control flow can be used by Trace，Please see #51803 (comment) | Tensor out, torch.dtype dtype, torch.layout layout, torch.device device, bool pin_memory, bool requires_grad) I suspect this is related to #51803 with a potential solution provided by ModelTC/MQBench#82. | 🐛 Bug if conditional cannot be symbolically traced. Related to #44901 To Reproduce Steps to reproduce the beh...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",eaf0e9f4a0fbb5fe6c0db232031130725688770d06787f0024633be2903bb6d4
+BUNDLE-1308,bundle:bundle-1308,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: graph breaks (3 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #111676: [export] self.buffer += 1 raises error,module: graph breaks,"Run one module: graph breaks stale-resolution sweep covering 3 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"111676, 114805, 114967",,3,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: graph breaks stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"duplicate of #111676 | issue #114805: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: graph breaks; title: Unsupported: call_method UserDefinedObjectVariable(_profiler_enabled) __call__ [] {}",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",442bbbf7f2acc7da7bdafc5aa45021414ea4670a67d90cc41f1c059a8ba4d277
+BUNDLE-1309,bundle:bundle-1309,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: half (21 issues),issue_group,,module: half stale/low urgency batch 1,module: half,"Run one module: half stale-resolution sweep covering 21 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"26218, 32137, 54774, 54983, 55442, 55629, 55755, 56231, 58841, 65447, 74634, 83281, 84348, 107514, 109753, 111454, 121960, 123911, 135969, 136680, 162674",,21,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: half stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #162674: stale/low urgency; labels: module: sparse, triaged, module: half; title: NotImplementedError: ""addmm_sparse_cuda"" not implemented for 'Half' | issue #32137: stale/low urgency; labels: module: numerical-stability, module: nn, triaged, module: half, actionable, module: norms and normalization; title: torch.nn.functional.normalize epsilon too small for half precision | issue #123911: stale/low urgency;...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a5daa4acb9095a7255309c838689ad15c6e077085d4b687c35ddd54238f6f30d
+BUNDLE-1310,bundle:bundle-1310,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: higher order operators (9 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #146108: [associative_scan] Support lifted arguments for inductor,module: higher order operators,"Run one module: higher order operators stale-resolution sweep covering 9 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"146108, 146111, 152870, 155230, 157919, 158566, 159353, 159852, 165999",,9,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: higher order operators stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"@ydwu4 assigned to you because of similar #146108 Feel free to unassign. | issue #165999: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, oncall: pt2, module: higher order operators, module: pt2-dispatcher, dependencies; title: [RFC] Improve the performance of `associative_scan()` with `cuda.compute` | issue #157919: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, oncall: pt2, module: higher order operators, module: pt2-dispatcher; title...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7d30c3b91e33f944f53a37240361d2357cb89a80ce6113c5d5684d86dd11ea60
+BUNDLE-1311,bundle:bundle-1311,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: hub (24 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 5 issues - issue #155992: [feature request] Native checkpointing to/from `s3://` (DCP / `torch.load` / `torch.save`),module: hub,"Run one module: hub stale-resolution sweep covering 24 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"27610, 30373, 33354, 43638, 45569, 52596, 56067, 65881, 68320, 68916, 71205, 73466, 74368, 75577, 81297, 84620, 90126, 90147, 91608, 91965, 96412, 134947, 155992, 171412",,24,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: hub stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"ode should also be more practical for loading from S3: [feature request] Native checkpointing to/from s3:// (DCP / torch.load / torch.save) #155992 And I also wonder, if HF model AutoLoader can do the same - to avoid hitting the HF servers more times than needed, before the we... | A bit related: #91965 | This new mode should also be more practical for loading from S3: #155992 And I also wonder, if HF model AutoLo...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",081a3013f43fbb281f502f91e88c29d109bc09854d214433ad1b7f2aae0f8c14
+BUNDLE-1312,bundle:bundle-1312,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: inductor (90 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #105582: RFC: Integrating oneDNN Graph Compiler into Inductor C++/OpenMP Backend for Enhanced Graph Fusion and Performance,module: inductor,"Run one module: inductor stale-resolution sweep covering 90 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"49444, 92259, 93482, 93639, 94167, 95021, 95423, 99807, 102319, 103652, 103990, 105582, 109213, 110448, 115966, 117251, 117976, 118175, 118570, 118573, 120057, 120116, 121311, 121371, 121631, 121968, 124145, 125672, 125683, 126708, 126913, 127271, 127500, 128012, 130769, 133250, 133383, 134363, 135305, 136118, 136733, 137012, 138280, 138743, 139268, 139602, 140592, 141507, 142315, 143453, 143931, 144375, 145242, 145326, 146629, 147062, 147999, 148052, 148073, 148116, 148196, 148960, 149319, 149440, 149603, 149879, 150476, 150871, 151555, 151705, 153103, 153241, 153532, 153737, 155838, 158240, 158699, 159769, 160142, 160359, 162198, 164041, 164813, 167027, 167520, 168651, 168652, 170345, 171184, 171534",,90,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: inductor stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"her features include low precision. Since PyTorch 1.12, this API has been added in TorchScript JIT fuser path showing promising performance #49444. Integrating the oneDNN Graph Compiler with Inductor C++ backend offers further performance enhancements. Additionally, adopting t... | file: test/inductor/test_select_algorithm.py Test class: TestSelectAlgorithm Test name: test_mm_dropout Defined at line: 329 Parent is...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c226180d756184fd7f279a84de20a586ab3a741caa13874fad77d597a8ba30e6
+BUNDLE-1313,bundle:bundle-1313,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: inductor (14 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 3 issues - issue #168644: TestModule: test/inductor/test_multi_kernel.py::MultiKernelTest,module: inductor,"Run one module: inductor stale-resolution sweep covering 14 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"114723, 114835, 122094, 124245, 135927, 139643, 141079, 146898, 149734, 168623, 168624, 168644, 168645, 168646",,14,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: inductor stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,Source file: test/inductor/test_multi_kernel.py Test class: MultiKernelTest Test name: test_triton_gemm Defined at line: 115 Parent issue: #168644 Code reference: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/blob/main/test/inductor/test_multi_kernel.py cc @sunway513 @jithunnair-amd @pru... | e: test/inductor/test_multi_kernel.py Test class: MultiKernelTest Test name: test_triton_relu_fused_gemm Defined at line: 144 Parent i...,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",81e2ed1958456d8006170a1886f2898512fb7ae92c2c556801a5747b08e0d8cb
+BUNDLE-1314,bundle:bundle-1314,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: infra (8 issues),issue_group,,module: infra stale/low urgency,module: infra,"Run one module: infra stale-resolution sweep covering 8 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"40319, 83932, 95244, 108862, 124953, 128735, 135362, 169458",,8,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: infra stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #169458: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: infra; title: [download.pytorch.org] obselete dangling `xformers` index on CPU only branch | issue #40319: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: infra; title: Too many labels in the repo | issue #135362: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: infra; title: MacOS runner fails at `Complete runner step` | issue #128735: stale/low urgency; labels: t...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",86fa3a486275c9ab46f0bcaf8a9d607b3a6845eb797688193a54d5d1a995e361
+BUNDLE-1315,bundle:bundle-1315,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: initialization (6 issues),issue_group,,module: initialization stale/low urgency,module: initialization,"Run one module: initialization stale-resolution sweep covering 6 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"43411, 54030, 54055, 65153, 124719, 136410",,6,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: initialization stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #136410: stale/low urgency; labels: module: sparse, module: nn, triaged, module: initialization; title: Implement kaiming_uniform_ for sparse tensors. | issue #124719: stale/low urgency; labels: module: nn, triaged, module: initialization; title: Questions about parameter initialization, especially with torch.bfloat16 precision | issue #65153: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, enhancement, module: initiali...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e4124f33e73912831a81ebf1cb99b2c86a97eaac323ba9ef8f3bc06948af594a
+BUNDLE-1316,bundle:bundle-1316,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: int overflow (13 issues),issue_group,,module: int overflow stale/low urgency,module: int overflow,"Run one module: int overflow stale-resolution sweep covering 13 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"107539, 107541, 107543, 107544, 107545, 107546, 107548, 107550, 107552, 107554, 107555, 107556, 107702",,13,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: int overflow stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #107702: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: int overflow; title: Inconsistencies when handling scalars that are out of the range relative to the input tensor's dtype | issue #107556: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: int overflow; title: Integer multiplication overflow when running torch.nn.AdaptiveAvgPool2d | issue #107555: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: int overflow; title:...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",498d19e078a2b4674b683bbebe5605867a2f1c2913ea95c5bea96a1f64ff6afc
+BUNDLE-1317,bundle:bundle-1317,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: intel (12 issues),issue_group,,module: intel stale/low urgency,module: intel,"Run one module: intel stale-resolution sweep covering 12 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"48246, 53707, 65448, 94021, 95146, 96738, 97757, 106602, 107294, 116322, 142484, 161163",,12,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: intel stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #161163: stale/low urgency; labels: module: performance, triaged, module: random, module: intel; title: Dropout performance degradation after version 2.6.0 | issue #106602: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, medium, module: intel; title: onednn ops supported in pytorch | issue #107294: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: intel, module: mps; title: 'MPS' training Issue(s) with NanoGPT: -Inf, NaN's |...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c0a3080604722e23a761ed25ce98cceb37123f33e892a41aed35fb6c38bb80c5
+BUNDLE-1318,bundle:bundle-1318,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: internals (86 issues),issue_group,,module: internals stale/low urgency batch 5,module: internals,"Run one module: internals stale-resolution sweep covering 86 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"4123, 4148, 4636, 8602, 12069, 14797, 17249, 19092, 19408, 20005, 20006, 20342, 20363, 20412, 21824, 21847, 22024, 22766, 24090, 24193, 24261, 24264, 24956, 26139, 26428, 27608, 28577, 29548, 30780, 30953, 32078, 32427, 33476, 34939, 37142, 37837, 38973, 38974, 38975, 40215, 40355, 40564, 41478, 42155, 43385, 44421, 44721, 46311, 46319, 46382, 46760, 48650, 48667, 48684, 49298, 50953, 51054, 51229, 52569, 52680, 56399, 57059, 62500, 62845, 62876, 63645, 73134, 73506, 75172, 76433, 76514, 76936, 77047, 77165, 78737, 81750, 81801, 90398, 91395, 99359, 102081, 105281, 117645, 123284, 126519, 147867",,86,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: internals stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #38974: stale/low urgency; labels: module: internals, triaged; title: ATen registrable operator list | issue #38973: stale/low urgency; labels: module: internals, triaged; title: ATen operator API versioning | issue #26139: stale/low urgency; labels: module: internals, triaged; title: c10 List API hard to use | issue #34939: stale/low urgency; labels: module: internals, triaged, module: mkldnn; title: Enable...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a002fd2f94befcd0ec9fa203e00cd704d28695d2bc8d9200665ff6fda4dc2e27
+BUNDLE-1319,bundle:bundle-1319,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: interpolation (14 issues),issue_group,,module: interpolation stale/low urgency,module: interpolation,"Run one module: interpolation stale-resolution sweep covering 14 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"10482, 10604, 52845, 61182, 62396, 63016, 63217, 66366, 70559, 76487, 80929, 84630, 86204, 94816",,14,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: interpolation stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #94816: stale/low urgency; labels: feature, module: nn, triaged, actionable, module: interpolation; title: grid_sample with relative grid | issue #10604: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: interpolation; title: Bilinear interpolation behavior inconsistent with TF, CoreML and Caffe | issue #86204: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: interpolation; title: How to perform unstructured interpolat...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",755c65c043c82f3d462cd246693b617e8cb02270a219598b828ab0a0a6b77b3e
+BUNDLE-1320,bundle:bundle-1320,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: ios (10 issues),issue_group,,module: ios stale/low urgency,module: ios,"Run one module: ios stale-resolution sweep covering 10 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"35535, 44313, 47904, 49456, 77538, 90551, 95946, 102833, 107394, 107581",,10,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: ios stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #102833: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: ios; title: LibTorch-Lite 1.13.0.1 Crash on iOS 12 on app startup | issue #107394: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, oncall: mobile, module: ios; title: [LibTorch/iOS] Unknown custom class type quantized.Conv2dPackedParamsBase. Please ensure it is registered | issue #107581: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, oncall: mobile, module: ios; title: [LibTorc...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1b6b1d8c95779d78919500b8ff9e94b9e74268c3bda890ce07b93519e05b57ae
+BUNDLE-1321,bundle:bundle-1321,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: jetson (4 issues),issue_group,,module: jetson stale/low urgency,module: jetson,"Run one module: jetson stale-resolution sweep covering 4 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"72581, 78067, 94614, 144033",,4,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: jetson stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #72581: stale/low urgency; labels: feature, triaged, module: jetson; title: Zero-copy on shared memory of NVIDIA Jetson devices | issue #144033: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: jetson; title: Training fails with Torch 2.1.0 on Nvidia Jetpack 5.1.2 | issue #78067: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: jetson; title: Installation on Jetson target board | issue #94614: stale/low urgency; label...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e6c0801148ca878d15aba198d038acab6e6acef475ae558b26cb04ec3cddf50a
+BUNDLE-1322,bundle:bundle-1322,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: jiterator (1 issue),issue_group,,#94443 A better error msg for `cuda.jiterator` when input is on `cpu`,module: jiterator,"Run one module: jiterator stale-resolution sweep covering 1 issue: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,94443,,1,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: jiterator stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #94443: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: jiterator; title: A better error msg for `cuda.jiterator` when input is on `cpu`",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",442cbaaba1e593e76f82d3a3ba70d03ef348f386654acf8e29fc59a567a47579
+BUNDLE-1323,bundle:bundle-1323,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: language binding (3 issues),issue_group,,module: language binding stale/low urgency,module: language binding,"Run one module: language binding stale-resolution sweep covering 3 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"28233, 32698, 54035",,3,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: language binding stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #28233: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: pybind, module: language binding; title: torch native functions cannot be used with inspect.signature | issue #54035: stale/low urgency; labels: feature, triaged, module: language binding; title: Web support? | issue #32698: stale/low urgency; labels: feature, low priority, triaged, module: language binding; title: Add Julia Bindings to Torch backend",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",88b450298d661dd4c478b2d07afaa575e6f866a885259ee027a329419326c27b
+BUNDLE-1324,bundle:bundle-1324,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: lazy (34 issues),issue_group,,module: lazy stale/low urgency batch 1,module: lazy,"Run one module: lazy stale-resolution sweep covering 34 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"62614, 62616, 62619, 62675, 63113, 63970, 64327, 65386, 65576, 65640, 65646, 65837, 66208, 67535, 67540, 67937, 70505, 72960, 73710, 73711, 73989, 73994, 74134, 75242, 79020, 79967, 80226, 80942, 83826, 87033, 94132, 97196, 99299, 147661",,34,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: lazy stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #147661: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: xla, module: linear algebra, module: lazy; title: Add shape fn for einsum | issue #99299: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, lazy, module: lazy; title: There has implmenet bug in LTC IrBuilder's MakeSizeMul method. | issue #94132: stale/low urgency; labels: module: nn, module: molly-guard, triaged, module: lazy; title: Asking for a LAZYMODULEMIXIN warning...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6344c56a80244f502261e03e19cfadab8b81d35973c61e2fe9665f1b9f0320c5
+BUNDLE-1325,bundle:bundle-1325,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: library (7 issues),issue_group,,module: library stale/low urgency,module: library,"Run one module: library stale-resolution sweep covering 7 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"83583, 99681, 107387, 107695, 125183, 125234, 127615",,7,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: library stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #127615: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: library; title: TORCH_LIBRARY breaks when passing (unexpanded) macro as namespace argument | issue #125234: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: library; title: torch.Library can easily cause segfault on loading/unloading | issue #125183: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: library; title: torch/_refs/__init__.py is not autoreloadable in ben...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b0191ee18e18bece7b18e1ce4d4a711a030cee4404f60ebe3a0c59ad917a6dde
+BUNDLE-1326,bundle:bundle-1326,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: linear algebra (99 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 7 issues - issue #168756: TestModule: test/test_linalg.py::TestLinalg,module: linear algebra,"Run one module: linear algebra stale-resolution sweep covering 99 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"1178, 12435, 13222, 21760, 22848, 23434, 25785, 25978, 31546, 36314, 37556, 41622, 47918, 48587, 49177, 50068, 52712, 55261, 55907, 56483, 56891, 57121, 60264, 60295, 61649, 61650, 62955, 64818, 68696, 69080, 70391, 72537, 72711, 72909, 74389, 75701, 76300, 76612, 76649, 76705, 76779, 78808, 78809, 80132, 82088, 83493, 84530, 84835, 86814, 87170, 88002, 88942, 90613, 95304, 101106, 102772, 103313, 105068, 105697, 109497, 111908, 121482, 121683, 122454, 122699, 125182, 127223, 128952, 131774, 132693, 132940, 134326, 135514, 136452, 136913, 137464, 138353, 138452, 142815, 143189, 146732, 148775, 148954, 154791, 154842, 158428, 165251, 168756, 168766, 168767, 168768, 168771, 168772, 168773, 168774, 168776, 168777, 168778, 174913",,99,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: linear algebra stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,Context Source file: test/test_linalg.py Test class: TestLinalg Test name: test_tensorinv Defined at line: 3771 Parent issue: #168756 Code reference: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/blob/main/test/test_linalg.py cc @sunway513 @jithunnair-amd @pruthvistony @ROCmSupport @ | ext Source file: test/test_linalg.py Test class: TestLinalg Test name: test__dyn_quant_pack_4bit_weight Defined at line: 7844 Parent issue: #...,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1da73883d630db4b9aac033bbe9b3a1f9e47b4dbc980517bd968b97a89046de8
+BUNDLE-1327,bundle:bundle-1327,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: linear algebra (8 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #61658: Move `torch.cholesky_solve` into `torch.linalg`.,module: linear algebra,"Run one module: linear algebra stale-resolution sweep covering 8 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"3619, 4358, 49252, 52915, 61658, 77166, 168780, 168781",,8,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: linear algebra stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"ve cholesky_solve, and expect that the user uses the construction above if they want to materialise the inverse. This is already tracked in #61658 | oesn't work # both cases work with torch.linalg.solve Additional context Memory inefficiency of the actual implementation is discussed here #49252. cc @jianyuh @nikitaved @pearu @mruberry @heitorschueroff @walterddr @IvanYashchuk | something similar was reported befor...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d9a7a2159f615272240d90ca4b398a97d037ad4a0cc8bf228996fa92f64f4b0d
+BUNDLE-1328,bundle:bundle-1328,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: lint (29 issues),issue_group,,module: lint stale/low urgency batch 2,module: lint,"Run one module: lint stale-resolution sweep covering 29 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"9032, 20466, 55764, 59854, 63919, 63920, 76618, 76827, 77253, 77548, 81259, 90827, 94504, 114155, 123062, 123465, 124857, 126386, 127352, 129410, 144217, 146699, 148451, 153638, 156073, 158783, 158785, 159122, 168907",,29,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: lint stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #124857: stale/low urgency; labels: module: lint, triaged; title: Use lintrunner-adapters for our adapters when possible | issue #114155: stale/low urgency; labels: module: lint, triaged; title: Lintrunner on all files fails locally even though it passes in CI | issue #77253: stale/low urgency; labels: module: lint, triaged; title: lintrunner not working | issue #90827: stale/low urgency; labels: module: lin...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ff250ae7cdae63471b41432bd0877ea95be8f5532dfc96efc95b679ca884c905
+BUNDLE-1329,bundle:bundle-1329,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: logging (13 issues),issue_group,,module: logging stale/low urgency,module: logging,"Run one module: logging stale-resolution sweep covering 13 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"39503, 40687, 52913, 82789, 86265, 98872, 103173, 109850, 120079, 135135, 142493, 143274, 146913",,13,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: logging stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #120079: stale/low urgency; labels: feature, low priority, module: logging, triaged, oncall: pt2; title: Use sys.settrace or torch function mode to compute how much of a model was not covered by Dynamo | issue #103173: stale/low urgency; labels: feature, module: logging, triaged, oncall: pt2, no-scrub; title: [RFC] Emit better Telemetry in PyTorch | issue #146913: stale/low urgency; labels: module: logging,...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7fd217598112138574fe52262ddc701f0b65ebfec8cb1e59305417d6ce60903d
+BUNDLE-1330,bundle:bundle-1330,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: loss (55 issues),issue_group,,module: loss stale/low urgency batch 3,module: loss,"Run one module: loss stale-resolution sweep covering 55 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"634, 842, 1249, 2629, 5157, 8062, 9250, 9286, 16148, 16599, 22604, 25057, 26228, 29754, 34879, 36553, 38185, 39435, 41142, 48621, 49844, 49851, 54137, 54843, 55902, 58351, 59216, 61309, 65329, 66083, 67136, 69858, 69900, 71367, 76646, 76732, 77256, 77529, 89369, 89408, 89907, 97539, 104711, 104776, 105304, 106467, 107680, 118918, 129222, 133084, 136145, 139916, 141177, 141822, 142146",,55,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: loss stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #67136: stale/low urgency; labels: feature, module: nn, module: loss, triaged, actionable; title: addition of loss function RMSE in the torch.nn | issue #66083: stale/low urgency; labels: feature, module: loss, triaged, module: shape checking; title: [feature request] Allow broadcasting for F.huber_loss and potentially other losses | issue #65329: stale/low urgency; labels: module: loss, triaged, enhancement...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c7b983e69586afdf03d4a07467a1c3c19e3466672c25dbb49f1215e400ad0706
+BUNDLE-1331,bundle:bundle-1331,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: lrscheduler (17 issues),issue_group,,module: lrscheduler stale/low urgency,module: lrscheduler,"Run one module: lrscheduler stale-resolution sweep covering 17 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"53712, 62475, 62640, 63488, 69753, 72714, 74884, 78253, 79888, 95122, 106339, 106359, 113222, 121271, 129565, 153842, 156846",,17,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: lrscheduler stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #156846: stale/low urgency; labels: module: optimizer, triaged, has workaround, module: LrScheduler; title: Can't alter the learning rate though loading optimizer states | issue #113222: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: LrScheduler, topic: deprecation; title: EPOCH_DEPRECATION_WARNING in ChainedScheduler.step | issue #153842: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: LrScheduler, oncall: distrib...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",20c6f596af4f8af80c068828ed60dd668eb62c8b7a26e61253cc8c265393b72a
+BUNDLE-1332,bundle:bundle-1332,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: lts (3 issues),issue_group,,module: lts stale/low urgency,module: lts,"Run one module: lts stale-resolution sweep covering 3 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"71340, 73424, 77463",,3,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: lts stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #77463: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: lts; title: conda CPU installation for LTS fails with UnsatisfiableError | issue #73424: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: lts; title: ""munmap_chunk(): invalid pointer"" interaction error with pytorch (< 1.10), pybind, and cv_bridge | issue #71340: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: lts; title: locally installed PyTorch upgraded or superse...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ac20c61d3ff4646723f960390656b2c49226fc0e37165ae9c5332836c5e79ef3
+BUNDLE-1333,bundle:bundle-1333,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: m1 (1 issue),issue_group,,#88614 The libtorch test TestScalarTensor.TestScalarTensorMPS fails on Apple Silicon,module: m1,"Run one module: m1 stale-resolution sweep covering 1 issue: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,88614,,1,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: m1 stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #88614: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, actionable, module: mps, module: m1; title: The libtorch test TestScalarTensor.TestScalarTensorMPS fails on Apple Silicon",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",27bd0d5aaf462cc95e5217a31fc02f9ac8e9618b98171ceddc6b8193b480e567
+BUNDLE-1334,bundle:bundle-1334,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: macos (16 issues),issue_group,,module: macos stale/low urgency batch 1,module: macos,"Run one module: macos stale-resolution sweep covering 16 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"7686, 19672, 31308, 54655, 57185, 79382, 83540, 87041, 95708, 97106, 103868, 117094, 127973, 148440, 159781, 171323",,16,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: macos stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #171323: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: macos, module: openmp, has workaround; title: Segmentation fault when calling `torch.tensor()` after importing xgboost | issue #159781: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: releng, triaged, module: macos; title: MacOS Python 3.13t wheel is build for macOS 14.0+ ARM64 while Py3.9-3.13 wheels are for macOS 11.0+ ARM64 | issue #57185: stale/low urgency; labels:...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6bc3e73d2bcd499174bf7fc4aec5ad819d673cdb3b00a7729e30678c66a888b7
+BUNDLE-1335,bundle:bundle-1335,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: masked operators (15 issues),issue_group,,module: masked operators stale/low urgency,module: masked operators,"Run one module: masked operators stale-resolution sweep covering 15 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"69359, 74301, 81985, 87076, 89416, 92350, 109009, 115422, 115624, 116461, 117287, 132608, 150186, 166401, 169191",,15,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: masked operators stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #169191: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: masked operators; title: dim broadcast in masked tensor between mask and data. | issue #166401: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: masked operators; title: torch.masked.argmax returns different results on CPU vs CUDA when multiple maximum values exist | issue #150186: stale/low urgency; labels: module: performance, triaged, module: masked operator...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",27902b544536db43e66285075a0fe502146ffc68bd249e126bf8fb38ee9cd367
+BUNDLE-1336,bundle:bundle-1336,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: memory format (30 issues),issue_group,,module: memory format stale/low urgency batch 2,module: memory format,"Run one module: memory format stale-resolution sweep covering 30 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"28221, 33571, 34812, 43195, 45823, 50549, 51558, 53510, 56525, 58979, 60028, 60063, 60092, 62925, 63299, 65687, 68430, 69213, 70171, 71630, 71978, 74442, 74935, 87451, 88612, 90708, 96743, 110387, 133665, 144711",,30,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: memory format stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #69213: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: memory format; title: torch.stack should have a pin_memory parameter | issue #68430: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: memory format; title: Strides issue on unsqueezed channels last tensor | issue #45823: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: memory format; title: Traceback for ""Warning: Mixed memory format inputs detected while calling the...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b4fd5981e458f722fbf3eb684bf1ab9b51d0a53b9b523753f8c26d14da9ef37d
+BUNDLE-1337,bundle:bundle-1337,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: memory usage (52 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #34257: CustomFromMask pruning stores a copy of the user-provided mask,module: memory usage,"Run one module: memory usage stale-resolution sweep covering 52 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"3931, 5161, 5434, 5528, 23382, 28055, 31655, 33864, 34257, 36874, 38177, 40400, 44182, 45321, 46084, 48377, 49139, 49394, 50835, 54713, 55260, 55607, 58980, 64043, 66162, 68422, 71266, 72450, 73709, 73883, 77839, 78274, 83914, 84944, 85538, 87090, 92252, 100656, 102334, 103422, 109445, 117467, 124487, 125217, 132596, 134051, 152550, 154128, 159622, 161381, 164966, 165319",,52,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: memory usage stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"This seems to be a duplicate of #34257. Is there any plans on fixing this? | oblems regarding your use case: There is a known issue that the SYSMAN/L0 driver provides inconsistent free memory result. The issue is in: #161381 . For internal track, see JIRA: GSD-11670 The provided reproducer trys to allocate big memory at once. The Driver team said the U... | issue #71266: stale/low urgency; labels: module: memory u...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",bb6fcaa388bd8833a9e4f39b805145942d08cb6b8c07a322beceba2cf908149a
+BUNDLE-1338,bundle:bundle-1338,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: meta tensors (19 issues),issue_group,,module: meta tensors stale/low urgency batch 1,module: meta tensors,"Run one module: meta tensors stale-resolution sweep covering 19 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"55192, 65577, 71305, 72650, 73065, 74329, 79848, 80067, 80921, 89301, 99414, 105105, 108671, 108870, 127754, 138396, 138399, 140602, 147643",,19,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: meta tensors stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #147643: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: meta tensors, module: python frontend; title: Representation string of a meta tensor is not a valid `tensor` call | issue #140602: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: numpy, module: meta tensors; title: torch.from_numpy() returns a cpu tensor, even under `with torch.device(""meta"")` | issue #127754: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: meta t...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",fd809e78fb84bff4c28f1a4430217371fffd85fb1f6eed3abb2cf64d195da528
+BUNDLE-1339,bundle:bundle-1339,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: minifier (1 issue),issue_group,,"#114356 [WARNING] could not load None, generating random data instead is too spammy",module: minifier,"Run one module: minifier stale-resolution sweep covering 1 issue: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,114356,,1,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: minifier stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #114356: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: minifier; title: [WARNING] could not load None, generating random data instead is too spammy",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",66da658cfe37af645cf696adc9c09cd67b87dc90842dda2d1916c9ea2397e3c0
+BUNDLE-1340,bundle:bundle-1340,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: mkl (2 issues),issue_group,,module: mkl stale/low urgency,module: mkl,"Run one module: mkl stale-resolution sweep covering 2 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"74167, 93275",,2,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: mkl stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #93275: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: mkl; title: Bug in torch.linalg.svd | issue #74167: stale/low urgency; labels: module: sparse, triaged, module: mkl; title: Slower performance of `torch.mm` method with sparse CSR tensor",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",941f47ef3412f03a6386a4d7acc6bb78365f2cdf29490cf2dff9bdf1616bb6fa
+BUNDLE-1341,bundle:bundle-1341,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: mkldnn (13 issues),issue_group,,module: mkldnn stale/low urgency,module: mkldnn,"Run one module: mkldnn stale-resolution sweep covering 13 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"4186, 21120, 22415, 23657, 27497, 32826, 32909, 60459, 62788, 62933, 96140, 103272, 114188",,13,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: mkldnn stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #21120: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: jit, oncall: quantization, triaged, module: mkldnn; title: [RFC] Adding MKL-DNN Int8 functions to PyTorch/Aten/JIT backend | issue #114188: stale/low urgency; labels: module: onnx, triaged, module: mkldnn, onnx-triaged, onnx-needs-info; title: Unsupported operator error: `aten::to_mkldnn` export to ONNX not supported | issue #103272: stale/low urgency; labels: triag...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e8077bebe7a5320b25abea41558a141002269e914e94479b043d3cf11f7b6ed9
+BUNDLE-1342,bundle:bundle-1342,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: molly-guard (2 issues),issue_group,,module: molly-guard stale/low urgency,module: molly-guard,"Run one module: molly-guard stale-resolution sweep covering 2 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"76383, 116533",,2,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: molly-guard stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #76383: stale/low urgency; labels: module: nn, module: molly-guard, triaged; title: Suggestion to throw a UserWarning when a user forgot .eval() mode during inference | issue #116533: stale/low urgency; labels: module: molly-guard, triaged, actionable, module: python frontend; title: `backward` implicit conversion from tuple to `torch.Tensor` results in an indexing error message",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",aa5976e0bef2b7d9a9278fef5a2d2ee32d5c3b09d1352faf423975032b228367
+BUNDLE-1343,bundle:bundle-1343,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: mpi (5 issues),issue_group,,module: mpi stale/low urgency,module: mpi,"Run one module: mpi stale-resolution sweep covering 5 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"22791, 25570, 51207, 134700, 139178",,5,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: mpi stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #25570: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, feature, triaged, module: mpi; title: Remote memory access similar to MPI one-sided in pytorch | issue #139178: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: mpi; title: the mpi backend not support to transfer float16/bfloat16 tensor and would post ""IndexError: map::at"" when transferring float16/bfloat16 tensor | issue #134700: stale/low urgency; labels:...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",fbab39d82f651487933e7ff100f1ce698f4843331da0aca11a32726098fdfd37
+BUNDLE-1344,bundle:bundle-1344,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: mps (47 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #116567: [MPS] `sort` incorrectly handles 'negative' NaNs,module: mps,"Run one module: mps stale-resolution sweep covering 47 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"78210, 84813, 86060, 87129, 88893, 92148, 95622, 99160, 101251, 104188, 104315, 104761, 106408, 109943, 111374, 112849, 112956, 115152, 115350, 116567, 116857, 117617, 117949, 118517, 119108, 119968, 121632, 122973, 124056, 125098, 127676, 127743, 138199, 138898, 140787, 141789, 143864, 143955, 145693, 148219, 149184, 152736, 153976, 156792, 161283, 169290, 170175",,47,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: mps stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"#116567 related nan sorting issue | issue #115152: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: scatter & gather ops, module: mps; title: scatter_ op after permute op not working correctly on mps device | issue #106408: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: mps; title: PyTorchMPS not showing up in Instruments for `torch.mps.profiler` | issue #118517: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: mps; title: Val...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5ae3af65d0f28cd61f7829b304084bcf4724e197f917e86ef067f4c2fcf104ec
+BUNDLE-1345,bundle:bundle-1345,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: mta (13 issues),issue_group,,module: mta stale/low urgency,module: mta,"Run one module: mta stale-resolution sweep covering 13 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"106427, 106931, 108445, 111351, 117233, 117884, 117981, 124726, 128395, 129329, 133586, 139795, 162911",,13,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: mta stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #162911: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: mta; title: `torch._foreach_...` functions error on zero-length inputs | issue #117884: stale/low urgency; labels: feature, module: optimizer, triaged, actionable, module: mta, oncall: pt2, module: pt2 optimizer; title: Foreach Where support | issue #133586: stale/low urgency; labels: module: nn, triaged, module: mta, oncall: pt2; title: No way for low-ove...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",30711dcfb9a5c1417a6525969c23dc9609ed764dcb0e555dec2c07a5506d4224
+BUNDLE-1346,bundle:bundle-1346,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: multi-gpu (2 issues),issue_group,,module: multi-gpu stale/low urgency,module: multi-gpu,"Run one module: multi-gpu stale-resolution sweep covering 2 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"78185, 87794",,2,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: multi-gpu stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #87794: stale/low urgency; labels: module: multi-gpu, triaged; title: CUDA error: operation not permitted when stream is capturing (2 GPUs) | issue #78185: stale/low urgency; labels: module: multi-gpu, triaged, actionable; title: test_to (__main__.TestTorch) fails with multiple gpus",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",fb27e3dac62af3e1e028bf27cb1bf2f8cea852cd666a981104b96677d88be20b
+BUNDLE-1347,bundle:bundle-1347,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: multiprocessing (56 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #151549: multiprocessing.pool.MaybeEncodingError Reason: 'RuntimeError('_share_fd_: only available on CPU')',module: multiprocessing,"Run one module: multiprocessing stale-resolution sweep covering 56 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"8126, 8913, 10996, 11786, 13300, 14047, 16954, 20248, 29172, 30461, 31571, 31596, 32322, 33799, 35472, 36922, 41639, 41694, 42049, 42444, 44545, 46093, 49672, 56480, 56921, 59546, 60401, 65418, 68861, 68935, 75662, 77050, 78075, 80765, 84994, 86467, 87056, 91889, 97902, 101293, 103397, 106989, 120354, 121430, 122186, 122626, 128351, 129656, 133010, 133210, 134755, 134926, 135705, 137777, 151549, 170636",,56,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: multiprocessing stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"Duplicated with #151549 | issue #80765: stale/low urgency; labels: module: multiprocessing, triaged, module: tensorboard; title: Let torch.utils.tensorboard support multiprocessing | issue #42444: stale/low urgency; labels: module: multiprocessing, triaged, module: random; title: torch.random.randperm stuck in multiprocess | issue #77050: stale/low urgency; labels: module: performance, module: multiprocessing, tri...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",31483f85c1959d55a8663146177d05e6340e90959d7996b5edd22ed546d4f3e9
+BUNDLE-1348,bundle:bundle-1348,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: multithreading (21 issues),issue_group,,module: multithreading stale/low urgency,module: multithreading,"Run one module: multithreading stale-resolution sweep covering 21 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"20189, 25601, 31461, 33327, 33367, 38510, 42094, 42502, 56794, 64864, 65229, 70241, 70940, 71383, 71409, 76966, 77140, 96036, 110032, 138468, 140012",,21,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: multithreading stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #140012: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: multithreading; title: Default value for get_num_threads | issue #138468: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: multithreading; title: os.environ modification is not thread safe | issue #110032: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: multithreading, module: sanitizers; title: Race condition on shutdown involving PThreadPool and autograd | issue...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",dd6f2b808042ad71cc9c31eb8e653720679579236dbdf1d3d224b700df8779ea
+BUNDLE-1349,bundle:bundle-1349,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: named tensor (26 issues),issue_group,,module: named tensor stale/low urgency batch 1,module: named tensor,"Run one module: named tensor stale-resolution sweep covering 26 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"27175, 28142, 28146, 28742, 29010, 31759, 33006, 33007, 37995, 38457, 41667, 43692, 46254, 49427, 60832, 61117, 61136, 63297, 64743, 67168, 70735, 79091, 83902, 94586, 119464, 121725",,26,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: named tensor stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #121725: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: named tensor, actionable, module: python frontend; title: torch.logsumexp throws RuntimeError instead of reducing all dimensions when dim=None | issue #41667: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, enhancement, module: named tensor; title: [Feature Request] named tensor support for `tensordot`(tensor contract) | issue #119464: stale/low urgency; labels: modul...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",59d28c39e5d5cfef5e3f6e0f13866769bd858f9de9d377a1f4e883b951f2f87e
+BUNDLE-1350,bundle:bundle-1350,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: nans and infs (14 issues),issue_group,,module: nans and infs stale/low urgency,module: nans and infs,"Run one module: nans and infs stale-resolution sweep covering 14 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"19126, 51906, 51911, 64525, 65663, 71475, 78484, 102400, 106604, 132614, 135992, 138570, 161500, 165537",,14,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: nans and infs stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #165537: stale/low urgency; labels: low priority, triaged, module: NaNs and Infs, topic: fuzzer; title: `torch.linspace` with `inf` endpoint and `float16` dtype returns all `nan`,inconsistent with NumPy | issue #161500: stale/low urgency; labels: module: nn, triaged, module: NaNs and Infs; title: nn.TransformerEncoder NaNs with float mask and float src_key_padding_mask only when in both eval() and torch.no_g...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",17d90ea2d8f83593d4af74bcffa3a6ae27004b65ca89a4b058b894b15df22d43
+BUNDLE-1351,bundle:bundle-1351,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: nccl (25 issues),issue_group,,module: nccl stale/low urgency batch 1,module: nccl,"Run one module: nccl stale-resolution sweep covering 25 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"8386, 32162, 37598, 40095, 40633, 42332, 44169, 67158, 113128, 115301, 117748, 118421, 118472, 129140, 130739, 132747, 135095, 139245, 146021, 146118, 149984, 152220, 159559, 168480, 168481",,25,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: nccl stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #67158: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: nccl; title: Make streams used for NCCL operations configurable | issue #159559: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: nccl; title: Support NCCL register userbuffer for P2P communication in NCCL backend | issue #149984: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: nccl; title: ncclSystemErr...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f66f16afd10a9802a80809299b96013ea24941ed3ae9e86a4dfcddf0cc50b43f
+BUNDLE-1352,bundle:bundle-1352,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: nestedtensor (57 issues),issue_group,,module: nestedtensor stale/low urgency batch 3,module: nestedtensor,"Run one module: nestedtensor stale-resolution sweep covering 57 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"1591, 49016, 73479, 75940, 78754, 80577, 81405, 82534, 82687, 83749, 83910, 84009, 84247, 86888, 90560, 90866, 93859, 95485, 95562, 95815, 97111, 104163, 108859, 110516, 118580, 122701, 124216, 125940, 126453, 129191, 130470, 131967, 132695, 133138, 135930, 136656, 136747, 137167, 137336, 137514, 138180, 138552, 138831, 138993, 145158, 145214, 145837, 148379, 149720, 150242, 151717, 152962, 153238, 153472, 159380, 161287, 168253",,57,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: nestedtensor stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #135930: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: nestedtensor; title: Integer overflow while creating nested tensors | issue #133138: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: nestedtensor; title: Layer normalization for Nested Tensors does not return the correct tensor types | issue #131967: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: nestedtensor; title: Layer normalization on Nested Tensor ragged di...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0f849a178c4fb6372c8ceafc70b47977c685fa750a48b92fe9ebaf7b3b99817b
+BUNDLE-1353,bundle:bundle-1353,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: nn (128 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #38208: nn.Module Abstract Class attribute overrides Child.,module: nn,"Run one module: nn stale-resolution sweep covering 128 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"1686, 1932, 4927, 6442, 9046, 10006, 20967, 28746, 28884, 30413, 30440, 30535, 30589, 30899, 30947, 30962, 31110, 31277, 31367, 31651, 32264, 33241, 33360, 33436, 34453, 34760, 34765, 36317, 37386, 38000, 38184, 38208, 39524, 40763, 41070, 43865, 46031, 49555, 49791, 60939, 64509, 66678, 67999, 69321, 78618, 80738, 82919, 86274, 90842, 91435, 92990, 95210, 96633, 96883, 97128, 98203, 98291, 99012, 99304, 100087, 102333, 102374, 103484, 103668, 104739, 105925, 106630, 107573, 109987, 110154, 114796, 115024, 115472, 116077, 116472, 118628, 118853, 119371, 119482, 120790, 120793, 123642, 124937, 126973, 127736, 128412, 131254, 132136, 133833, 135150, 137173, 137192, 138320, 138420, 139191, 139381, 139582, 139701, 139910, 140703, 140881, 141018, 141801, 141828, 142301, 143293, 143424, 143669, 143754, 143860, 144116, 144223, 145468, 145851, 146034, 146708, 146711, 146831, 147389, 147495, 147506, 148232, 149040, 149120, 149841, 150402, 152152, 152188",,128,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: nn stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"ar = Bar(123) print(bar.x) # prints 123 bar = Bar(nn.Linear(1, 2)) print(bar.x) # prints None dir(bar).count('x') # prints 2 Edit: See also #38208 | issue #49791: stale/low urgency; labels: module: performance, feature, module: nn, triaged; title: Caching for autoregressive decoding of Transformer | issue #49555: stale/low urgency; labels: module: nn, triaged; title: Gunicorn preload flag not working with PyTorch...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2e47304d9e0a9bc934817fce012b2cd2166658d7a754f43951ffed4724a265e5
+BUNDLE-1354,bundle:bundle-1354,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: nn (140 issues),issue_group,,module: nn stale/low urgency batch 24,module: nn,"Run one module: nn stale-resolution sweep covering 140 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"285, 1410, 1927, 2400, 5435, 5790, 5912, 7773, 7865, 8921, 9678, 9681, 11624, 12159, 12460, 12675, 13162, 17313, 18728, 18796, 20058, 20424, 21411, 26527, 26781, 27839, 30658, 31818, 31856, 34874, 35775, 35798, 38394, 38955, 39674, 41099, 41256, 41528, 42625, 43402, 43876, 46149, 46971, 47175, 47588, 47699, 48235, 48511, 48526, 48626, 48645, 49723, 51320, 52011, 53103, 55030, 55804, 57406, 57631, 58093, 58846, 59925, 61149, 61452, 62545, 63004, 65163, 65520, 65622, 65688, 65774, 66874, 67481, 67565, 68179, 68337, 68420, 68512, 68655, 68752, 69207, 69325, 69721, 69756, 70095, 70100, 70348, 70455, 70500, 70995, 71211, 71877, 72452, 72580, 72643, 72672, 72821, 73222, 73484, 74143, 74296, 74411, 74554, 75251, 75680, 75923, 76011, 76613, 76636, 76906, 76920, 77067, 78450, 78744, 78786, 80458, 80932, 80951, 80954, 83032, 83152, 83169, 83221, 83229, 83232, 83238, 86356, 89344, 89597, 95290, 121160, 148065, 152607, 154241, 155193, 156177, 158832, 159138, 161869, 163821",,140,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: nn stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #35775: stale/low urgency; labels: module: numerical-stability, module: nn, triaged; title: Unexpected behaviour for affine_grid and grid_sample with 3D inputs | issue #34874: stale/low urgency; labels: module: nn, triaged, function request; title: Extend nn.functional.softmax for arbitrary dimensions | issue #30658: stale/low urgency; labels: module: nn, triaged, module: vision, module: pooling, function re...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2ab1dc290fb619d326c4a497b51844f04d28898dfb8a93d23e2a6dabccae846b
+BUNDLE-1355,bundle:bundle-1355,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: nn (120 issues),issue_group,,module: nn stale/low urgency batch 15,module: nn,"Run one module: nn stale-resolution sweep covering 120 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"1362, 7733, 15994, 18206, 18220, 19682, 20022, 20165, 20204, 22277, 22879, 24089, 25034, 25092, 26551, 28962, 29429, 31423, 34772, 37092, 37554, 40859, 44989, 44991, 45009, 45352, 45851, 53785, 55457, 55910, 60466, 67913, 71203, 72283, 88810, 94428, 97915, 102999, 103316, 104698, 104788, 104823, 105448, 106011, 106545, 109586, 110356, 110959, 111368, 114093, 114107, 114131, 115064, 116175, 116502, 116608, 116861, 117275, 117437, 117546, 118294, 118972, 119368, 119474, 120396, 120587, 121193, 122250, 122660, 122803, 124194, 125116, 125389, 126000, 126755, 127535, 127701, 127732, 127733, 127734, 128165, 128493, 128779, 129564, 130342, 131110, 131307, 131688, 132034, 132231, 133522, 133527, 133535, 133818, 134948, 136071, 136072, 136073, 136096, 136098, 136110, 136138, 136409, 136926, 136937, 136938, 136955, 136994, 137086, 137089, 152308, 156062, 165312, 165982, 166080, 166378, 168010, 170382, 170691, 170851",,120,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: nn stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #34772: stale/low urgency; labels: module: nn, triaged, module: vision; title: Unsupported ONNX op (Upsample 3D, bicubic) contrary to documentation | issue #106545: stale/low urgency; labels: module: nn, triaged; title: `softmax` to handle dimensions comprised of `-inf` | issue #55457: stale/low urgency; labels: module: nn, triaged; title: [feature request] TupleSequential module or an option for Sequential...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",50b6511bedb8cec7811911fbe4a8ff8cbbcbd26a1979a05bbc62f2b38c24d675
+BUNDLE-1356,bundle:bundle-1356,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: nn (21 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 3 issues - issue #102977: raise `RuntimeError` faster when loading an object with a torch CUDA tensor on a CPU-only machine,module: nn,"Run one module: nn stale-resolution sweep covering 21 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"499, 2001, 5580, 13218, 15457, 15617, 16797, 28594, 42295, 42316, 43369, 51471, 51782, 51896, 57815, 62009, 62094, 63034, 74519, 86162, 102977",,21,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: nn stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"#16797 solution This solution works for me! Thank you man! | motivation and pitch Currently when loading an object with a torch CUDA tensor on a CPU-only machine, torch will raise a RuntimeError like #16797 mentioned. A problem in this situation is that torch will spend time (maybe trying to load the tensor bytes) before raise that Runt... | rror, for TestNllLossBackward) @wconstab ASAN: test_ts_opinfo.py failure...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7dd80ab264eea6d6d7d196ee139f45bbb7d9efae94184b9aacd24391e8d1d389
+BUNDLE-1357,bundle:bundle-1357,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: nn (4 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #11514: [feature request] - Allow sequences lengths to be 0 in PackSequence,module: nn,"Run one module: nn stale-resolution sweep covering 4 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"11514, 50192, 107896, 128785",,4,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: nn stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,Related: #50192 | Related: #107896,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",36806245c52209af6b887978a35dd293822cdb06a875d2918dd55b3947441ca2
+BUNDLE-1358,bundle:bundle-1358,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: nn.utils.parametrize (2 issues),issue_group,,module: nn.utils.parametrize stale/low urgency,module: nn.utils.parametrize,"Run one module: nn.utils.parametrize stale-resolution sweep covering 2 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"102740, 125064",,2,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: nn.utils.parametrize stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #125064: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: nn.utils.parametrize; title: ValueError: weight_norm of 'weight' not found in ParametrizedConvTranspose1d | issue #102740: stale/low urgency; labels: module: rnn, triaged, module: nn.utils.parametrize; title: parameterizations.orthogonal does not work as intended with nn.GRU or nn.LSTM",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a543239b057148d8d00cdee1b30fe72a49518ea7f5faa1df5144e26a224b4d5f
+BUNDLE-1359,bundle:bundle-1359,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: nnpack (2 issues),issue_group,,module: nnpack stale/low urgency,module: nnpack,"Run one module: nnpack stale-resolution sweep covering 2 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"84045, 107534",,2,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: nnpack stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #107534: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: nnpack; title: NNPACK slow down M1/M2 Mac CPU | issue #84045: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: nnpack; title: COREMLTOOLs/NNPACK Python Issue",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",69f2610a4398cdbf5912350eb615a4b727323aa460d3a442dd880886f1bb8735
+BUNDLE-1360,bundle:bundle-1360,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: norms and normalization (12 issues),issue_group,,module: norms and normalization stale/low urgency,module: norms and normalization,"Run one module: norms and normalization stale-resolution sweep covering 12 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"8035, 12189, 12760, 12812, 20551, 49431, 50090, 73161, 78656, 98075, 104853, 137172",,12,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: norms and normalization stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #78656: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, enhancement, module: norms and normalization; title: Allow batch_norm_backward_elemt and batch_norm_gather_stats_with_counts handle 0 counts | issue #137172: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: norms and normalization; title: `torch._batch_norm_impl_index` performs inconsistently on CPU and CUDA | issue #20551: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: nu...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",98df385dbde75f9b55156cc319cc1aac9b150951507339a7f3a3292b07394256
+BUNDLE-1361,bundle:bundle-1361,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: numba (1 issue),issue_group,,#23067 creation of a tensor from a numba.cuda array,module: numba,"Run one module: numba stale-resolution sweep covering 1 issue: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,23067,,1,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: numba stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #23067: stale/low urgency; labels: feature, low priority, triaged, module: numba; title: creation of a tensor from a numba.cuda array",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0ffb81ed91c2e2b8f0f4175d7e79d04834600aadc377d8d3706000fb87295c72
+BUNDLE-1362,bundle:bundle-1362,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: numerical-reproducibility (8 issues),issue_group,,module: numerical-reproducibility stale/low urgency,module: numerical-reproducibility,"Run one module: numerical-reproducibility stale-resolution sweep covering 8 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"8242, 51426, 54947, 58758, 68102, 73475, 80808, 121595",,8,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: numerical-reproducibility stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #121595: stale/low urgency; labels: low priority, triaged, module: random, module: numerical-reproducibility, actionable; title: Different Dropout behavior on macOS and Linux | issue #68102: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: numerical-reproducibility; title: Can not guarantee reproducible for `nn.ReflectionPad2d` | issue #8242: stale/low urgency; labels: module: numerical-stability, module: rnn, tr...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",11f9fa54ee22e221a2d8a1fa1cdd3212d63c79dc04524080ce7ffd357457b6e6
+BUNDLE-1363,bundle:bundle-1363,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: numerical-stability (17 issues),issue_group,,module: numerical-stability stale/low urgency,module: numerical-stability,"Run one module: numerical-stability stale-resolution sweep covering 17 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"38051, 50473, 53263, 53758, 56698, 57690, 65050, 65868, 66460, 66491, 76555, 78741, 95934, 101666, 121789, 141802, 165906",,17,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: numerical-stability stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #165906: stale/low urgency; labels: module: numerical-stability, triaged; title: `torch.bmm` returns wrong results for large tensors with torch.set_float32_matmul_precision(""medium"") | issue #101666: stale/low urgency; labels: module: numerical-stability, triaged; title: Unexpected behavior of fmod op in some float32 input | issue #141802: stale/low urgency; labels: module: numerical-stability, triaged, modu...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6240c2eaeaea33e5674c467c9644652edfea9e5a2b6caf1cea86b4240214690e
+BUNDLE-1364,bundle:bundle-1364,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: numpy (93 issues),issue_group,,module: numpy stale/low urgency batch 6,module: numpy,"Run one module: numpy stale-resolution sweep covering 93 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"7610, 9186, 16330, 16703, 18315, 19143, 19172, 20323, 29372, 31895, 32589, 35499, 36058, 36309, 36748, 37809, 38272, 38323, 38328, 39656, 42053, 42223, 42671, 42805, 43064, 43255, 44968, 47841, 48338, 50333, 50360, 51199, 51280, 51284, 51406, 51849, 52334, 52552, 52722, 53090, 53095, 53284, 54116, 54620, 55286, 55289, 55356, 56671, 56774, 57018, 59247, 61292, 61816, 62026, 64107, 64502, 66489, 67011, 69386, 69822, 69892, 70555, 71204, 74236, 74420, 78413, 84539, 85606, 86315, 89419, 90412, 90820, 91447, 92778, 94909, 97760, 109873, 110285, 114679, 120209, 121926, 127194, 129085, 129634, 132026, 135484, 135611, 136305, 137045, 137182, 139281, 141343, 142174",,93,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: numpy stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #9186: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: numpy, module: pybind, module: ux; title: [pytorch] Make dtype second positional argument of tensor factory methods | issue #16703: stale/low urgency; labels: feature, triaged, module: numpy; title: split_with_sizes should accept a LongTensor as the split_sizes parameter | issue #48338: stale/low urgency; labels: feature, triaged, module: numpy; title: torch...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8a733ba794d3dce0399a4e0f8ebdbc3b71d9f853381d860046ce2dbcd06872f0
+BUNDLE-1365,bundle:bundle-1365,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: numpy (2 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #165244: torch.tensor slicing with negative step raises ValueError,module: numpy,"Run one module: numpy stale-resolution sweep covering 2 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"38271, 165244",,2,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: numpy stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"See #38271 and many other discussions related to this. While we're not opposed to this, the implication are huge as all the implementation needs to be",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4a0fd7d79b7d0d6ef4d2ca103ae9c60cfa1789101076bfd26511573afded7490
+BUNDLE-1366,bundle:bundle-1366,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: nvfuser (37 issues),issue_group,,module: nvfuser stale/low urgency batch 2,module: nvfuser,"Run one module: nvfuser stale-resolution sweep covering 37 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"75371, 75474, 76007, 76070, 76491, 76933, 79244, 79246, 79261, 79325, 80187, 80189, 80230, 80231, 80541, 80551, 80851, 80966, 80986, 81307, 81358, 81531, 83388, 83726, 84311, 85081, 85258, 85520, 85544, 86529, 86554, 86601, 88194, 88931, 88991, 89609, 94161",,37,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: nvfuser stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #80541: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: nvfuser, module: primTorch; title: [Prims+NVFuser] Prims with missing NVFuser ops | issue #84311: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: nvfuser; title: DecompositionInterpreter creates invalid graph | issue #83726: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: nvfuser, module: primTorch; title: nvfuser + prim stack generated illegal PTX code on hardware...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f3b4b54213950ca88848df4abd7735e7d71651fde91a3526a800f68460848b16
+BUNDLE-1367,bundle:bundle-1367,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: onnx (99 issues),issue_group,,module: onnx stale/low urgency batch 6,module: onnx,"Run one module: onnx stale-resolution sweep covering 99 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"39245, 44878, 52230, 61167, 64477, 65657, 65698, 66200, 68944, 70446, 74034, 75625, 81084, 89634, 89675, 90607, 94164, 94675, 98727, 99770, 103089, 105299, 107016, 108342, 109292, 110056, 110131, 110866, 111186, 112831, 113817, 116182, 116965, 117209, 119442, 121629, 122107, 122290, 122321, 122359, 122957, 123353, 123555, 123628, 124711, 124915, 124956, 124973, 125835, 125893, 125902, 126065, 126549, 126660, 126774, 126856, 126921, 126972, 127518, 127606, 127875, 128323, 128325, 129200, 130114, 130366, 130539, 130644, 131349, 134664, 134827, 135398, 136083, 136592, 136622, 136918, 137419, 139429, 140130, 140237, 143474, 143497, 144464, 147720, 147859, 148098, 150544, 151064, 151402, 151793, 152097, 155997, 156811, 156873, 157220, 161365, 162449, 164116, 167063",,99,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: onnx stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #108342: stale/low urgency; labels: module: onnx, triaged; title: ONNX export constant folding messes up with shared weight deduplication | issue #70446: stale/low urgency; labels: module: onnx, triaged, onnx-triaged; title: Exporting the operator prim_DictConstruct to ONNX opset version 13 is not supported | issue #124915: stale/low urgency; labels: module: onnx, triaged; title: Exporting torch slice_scatte...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",47d131e18e6c20e67d946ef661c43863c70759f3f6327920e9282299f0692266
+BUNDLE-1368,bundle:bundle-1368,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: opcheck (4 issues),issue_group,,module: opcheck stale/low urgency,module: opcheck,"Run one module: opcheck stale-resolution sweep covering 4 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"111924, 111930, 111931, 112251",,4,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: opcheck stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #111931: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: opcheck; title: [opcheck] Faster gradcheck execution | issue #112251: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: opcheck; title: Optest is unable to xfail on parametrized tests | issue #111930: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: opcheck; title: [opcheck] Way to reduce Hypothesis sampling when running opcheck | issue #111924: stale/low urgency; la...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0eeafcc8a1f05c6962a0c15b22f29f5e82858439a9c7a81790c14140f1495667
+BUNDLE-1369,bundle:bundle-1369,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: openmp (1 issue),issue_group,,#101188 Weird dataloader performance degradation caused by torch and numpy import order,module: openmp,"Run one module: openmp stale-resolution sweep covering 1 issue: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,101188,,1,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: openmp stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #101188: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: openmp; title: Weird dataloader performance degradation caused by torch and numpy import order",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1d7c7840fd4c7bbd316aaeff9bc3e382c04ee6cbfff49885ec2ac63adeebd3ed
+BUNDLE-1370,bundle:bundle-1370,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: optimizer (94 issues),issue_group,,module: optimizer stale/low urgency batch 6,module: optimizer,"Run one module: optimizer stale-resolution sweep covering 94 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"1329, 1489, 2478, 2545, 2849, 2854, 3790, 5737, 6138, 6564, 7066, 7342, 8741, 9560, 9952, 12146, 14467, 15070, 18414, 20086, 20138, 20405, 22281, 22343, 28194, 29814, 29816, 30386, 30873, 34660, 36989, 38471, 38853, 39625, 40492, 40997, 41006, 41322, 41623, 41839, 42428, 43706, 46809, 46822, 46947, 47307, 47560, 48518, 49082, 49300, 49630, 49885, 50366, 50402, 50694, 51407, 51794, 52236, 52911, 56237, 56843, 58127, 70352, 81162, 86339, 97004, 101291, 101370, 104789, 106121, 106221, 111025, 116052, 116592, 116707, 118370, 122550, 123238, 124133, 124523, 126638, 127189, 128208, 133268, 137387, 138248, 141216, 143836, 143947, 146157, 147288, 149269, 168967, 169170",,94,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: optimizer stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #41322: stale/low urgency; labels: module: optimizer, triaged; title: SGD documentatiuon detail on g_{t+1} | issue #41623: stale/low urgency; labels: module: optimizer, triaged, enhancement; title: Can we have a way to reset a scheduler back to epoch -1 | issue #40997: stale/low urgency; labels: module: optimizer, triaged; title: Is this a bug? The values calculated according to the document isn't equal to t...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2ea50f178534a4700d6dc079cf2a4720a72bba7931477697f5ab0f342eeeb7c0
+BUNDLE-1371,bundle:bundle-1371,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: optimizer (5 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #145710: LBFGS-B with cuda implementation (and CPU one too),module: optimizer,"Run one module: optimizer stale-resolution sweep covering 5 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"6083, 137367, 137373, 145710, 146201",,5,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: optimizer stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"There is currently no plan for adding bounds support to L-BFGS, though there has been at least 1 issue talking about it lately: #145710 We typically are conservative about adding new functions/optimizers to the codebase and would encourage development in third-party repos fi | See my comment here: #137373 (comment) | issue #6083: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, module: optimizer, triaged; title: [f...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",87f9b2bd72c9349edb2d2b90f8cde47e3ca3c1d6ff7c8a183d629dc003c3c702
+BUNDLE-1372,bundle:bundle-1372,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: padding (2 issues),issue_group,,module: padding stale/low urgency,module: padding,"Run one module: padding stale-resolution sweep covering 2 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"32912, 170536",,2,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: padding stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #170536: stale/low urgency; labels: low priority, triaged, module: padding; title: accept int padding value for F.pad | issue #32912: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, function request, module: padding; title: Optional seq_len argument to torch.nn.utils.rnn.pad_sequence",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3ccb4ca0042cc6e0cd290421763cbe04751021255f408beec1aaad9e80ef54cc
+BUNDLE-1373,bundle:bundle-1373,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: partial aliasing (2 issues),issue_group,,module: partial aliasing stale/low urgency,module: partial aliasing,"Run one module: partial aliasing stale-resolution sweep covering 2 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"82303, 144861",,2,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: partial aliasing stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #144861: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: partial aliasing; title: Region check for in-place read and write does not always work | issue #82303: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: partial aliasing; title: Race condition between torch.tensor's view and /= (/= returns incorrect result)",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",bbabd698c9f3f4b79ed8ab85641a5d0b835f9c6b32729f4f7262f6d2815ccb39
+BUNDLE-1374,bundle:bundle-1374,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: performance (54 issues),issue_group,,module: performance stale/low urgency batch 3,module: performance,"Run one module: performance stale-resolution sweep covering 54 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"3076, 19953, 22578, 23655, 23865, 28761, 30248, 32754, 36140, 37487, 39358, 39852, 39864, 40916, 41162, 41383, 44274, 44504, 45764, 47688, 47702, 47912, 50328, 50852, 51393, 52465, 52578, 53194, 53491, 57611, 65512, 66249, 66787, 74951, 75599, 78800, 82397, 82793, 85147, 92223, 101070, 104296, 115434, 120667, 121661, 124465, 132612, 134388, 137872, 138773, 142875, 148045, 151066, 158080",,54,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: performance stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #52465: stale/low urgency; labels: module: performance, triaged, NNC; title: [nnc][perf] Performance decrease with CPU fusion on `freeze(script(pytorch_mobilenet_v3))` | issue #53491: stale/low urgency; labels: module: performance, triaged; title: Very slow backward speed when using gather with small-range indices | issue #53194: stale/low urgency; labels: module: performance, triaged, module: sorting and se...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",af3a1f4e765c843f85357a28e9a542433d4d1b3c345a57f7953eeaefacef76a0
+BUNDLE-1375,bundle:bundle-1375,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: pickle (6 issues),issue_group,,module: pickle stale/low urgency,module: pickle,"Run one module: pickle stale-resolution sweep covering 6 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"3473, 6107, 18436, 19529, 51836, 145665",,6,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: pickle stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #145665: stale/low urgency; labels: module: pickle, triaged; title: Pickling duplicates Storage | issue #51836: stale/low urgency; labels: module: pickle, triaged, better-engineering; title: TypeError: can't pickle _thread.lock objects when using spawn / forkserver | issue #3473: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, feature, module: pickle, module: serialization, triaged; title: Feature Request: D...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",55415e0786c9f2c662f1b47246e0fdf367031dad6db96abe7afed78ab27251ac
+BUNDLE-1376,bundle:bundle-1376,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: pipelining (11 issues),issue_group,,module: pipelining stale/low urgency,module: pipelining,"Run one module: pipelining stale-resolution sweep covering 11 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"127964, 128665, 128910, 129732, 130055, 130058, 138726, 144530, 147348, 151269, 164756",,11,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: pipelining stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #164756: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: pipelining; title: [PP] Unshard and reshard not working with FSDP | issue #144530: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: pipelining; title: [Pipelining] PP+DDP does not work for Zero Bubble | issue #151269: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: pipelining; title: [PP] Hang when num_...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1b276b65a0a16ff2f715464f09070e9a7493edc408883cf2270f848d4d2b4393
+BUNDLE-1377,bundle:bundle-1377,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: pooling (13 issues),issue_group,,module: pooling stale/low urgency,module: pooling,"Run one module: pooling stale-resolution sweep covering 13 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"1468, 9570, 14907, 17169, 33086, 39757, 39959, 46929, 51038, 51622, 54499, 73841, 107412",,13,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: pooling stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #1468: stale/low urgency; labels: feature, triaged, module: pooling; title: avg_pool functions hold input for backward | issue #39757: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, enhancement, module: pooling; title: max_unpool2d and max_unpool3d cpp signature should be similar | issue #107412: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, actionable, module: pooling; title: max_pool1d, max_pool2d, max_pool3d Integers for cpu...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9667b08a592187b9273912caaf97d98578dfb3c6f51d8396612f355809fab727
+BUNDLE-1378,bundle:bundle-1378,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: porting (2 issues),issue_group,,module: porting stale/low urgency,module: porting,"Run one module: porting stale-resolution sweep covering 2 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"11439, 18351",,2,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: porting stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #11439: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: porting, better-engineering, module: tensor creation; title: High leverage TH operations to port to ATen | issue #18351: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: porting; title: Port SpatialConvolutionMM and VolumetricConvolutionMM to ATen",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5ee82348649e5292fff3c72e9891f66be510567c574cd2e210ac55255644177a
+BUNDLE-1379,bundle:bundle-1379,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: power (12 issues),issue_group,,module: power stale/low urgency,module: power,"Run one module: power stale-resolution sweep covering 12 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"2466, 2703, 12980, 39671, 40114, 41531, 41844, 54407, 57533, 74614, 109870, 115820",,12,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: power stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #74614: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: POWER; title: compilation error with PyTorch v1.11 for CPU on ppc64le | issue #115820: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: third_party, module: POWER, module: xnnpack; title: Question on XNNPACK support for PowerPC | issue #109870: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: POWER; title: Wrongly returns nan for vectorized complex numbers division o...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e63c381ac852cc3e79a49224f1934252080cad97fe15b09c610f215c5d396238
+BUNDLE-1380,bundle:bundle-1380,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: primtorch (30 issues),issue_group,,module: primtorch stale/low urgency batch 1,module: primtorch,"Run one module: primtorch stale-resolution sweep covering 30 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"37160, 74616, 76804, 76806, 76871, 76944, 77216, 77675, 78053, 78070, 78071, 78738, 79089, 79177, 80154, 81649, 81669, 81959, 83931, 84335, 84412, 84529, 84717, 85121, 85438, 85834, 101669, 102609, 102610, 107494",,30,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: primtorch stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #107494: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: primTorch; title: Mismatch in type of error raised when reducing along empty slice between eager and primtorch | issue #102609: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: primTorch; title: [prims] torch.ops.aten.le decomposition confuses scalars and tensors | issue #102610: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: primTorch; title: Cannot invoke prims....",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1cf5189c42ec77e7f80787a5674eebeef8631b79aff12647bddc4101951345f5
+BUNDLE-1381,bundle:bundle-1381,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: printing (7 issues),issue_group,,module: printing stale/low urgency,module: printing,"Run one module: printing stale-resolution sweep covering 7 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"8821, 12797, 21028, 35071, 63855, 74138, 84710",,7,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: printing stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #63855: stale/low urgency; labels: module: printing, triaged, enhancement; title: Include tensor shape in its default print formatting | issue #35071: stale/low urgency; labels: module: printing, triaged; title: Options for printing the shape with print(tensor) | issue #84710: stale/low urgency; labels: module: printing, triaged; title: About the different ways to print models | issue #74138: stale/low urgen...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ea31b65d38e79547d5bf0fe7b85534cc3b0ca78b19919cdddd0f05e90e71ebca
+BUNDLE-1382,bundle:bundle-1382,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: privateuse1 (7 issues),issue_group,,module: privateuse1 stale/low urgency,module: privateuse1,"Run one module: privateuse1 stale-resolution sweep covering 7 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"125895, 133183, 134293, 135153, 156444, 161954, 171956",,7,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: privateuse1 stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #171956: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: PrivateUse1; title: [Inductor] Eliminate triton-related hardcode | issue #161954: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: PrivateUse1; title: [RFC] CUDA code decoupling and directory refactoring | issue #156444: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: PrivateUse1; title: Tensor.is_pinned() raises error after renaming privateuseone backend. | issue...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",63af53d726182af782cb5e2792d7fcf0a70b404d79d17699618b6f60fcf3751a
+BUNDLE-1383,bundle:bundle-1383,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: protobuf (3 issues),issue_group,,module: protobuf stale/low urgency,module: protobuf,"Run one module: protobuf stale-resolution sweep covering 3 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"24037, 69199, 127270",,3,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: protobuf stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #127270: stale/low urgency; labels: module: protobuf, triaged; title: Not supporting higher protobuf versions | issue #69199: stale/low urgency; labels: module: protobuf, triaged, module: tensorboard; title: Protocol buffers library mismatch. | issue #24037: stale/low urgency; labels: module: protobuf, caffe2, triaged; title: Tests do not pass with the latest protobuf",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",bfcefc466018e2ac4316fb09f6f05be2921c3768dd954ba10f12dcd4e2c86afd
+BUNDLE-1384,bundle:bundle-1384,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: proxytensor (2 issues),issue_group,,module: proxytensor stale/low urgency,module: proxytensor,"Run one module: proxytensor stale-resolution sweep covering 2 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"89060, 132759",,2,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: proxytensor stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #132759: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: ProxyTensor; title: Delete ProxyTorchDispatchMode.enable_tracing | issue #89060: stale/low urgency; labels: module: tests, triaged, module: ProxyTensor; title: Extend test_proxy_tensor tests to support ops test non floating point types",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",28b5550f0068afafe8abe1dfe318f0a7b024acdb6b5fe15998fbf91a342c23cb
+BUNDLE-1385,bundle:bundle-1385,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: pruning (4 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #69353: Pruning `torch.nn.MultiheadAttention` causes RuntimeError,module: pruning,"Run one module: pruning stale-resolution sweep covering 4 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"69353, 78109, 85397, 157218",,4,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: pruning stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"ttention, it will never be called. Which may cause some abnormal behaviors when use tools implemented with hook, e.g. torch.nn.utils.prune (#69353). And this is because when you forward a MultiheadAttention, it directly call the out_proj.weight without forwarding it in torch._... | issue #157218: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: pruning; title: [Feature] Taylor expansion pruning | issue #85397: stale/lo...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",aa64f2e6541f3fe0f41a951a3aae94825fe0de4d37932447da83ab91dd740495
+BUNDLE-1386,bundle:bundle-1386,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: pt2 accuracy (2 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #111384: [quant][pt2] Default batchnorm aten op has poor numerics during QAT,module: pt2 accuracy,"Run one module: pt2 accuracy stale-resolution sweep covering 2 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"111384, 114859",,2,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: pt2 accuracy stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"the numeric differences between torch.ops.aten._native_batch_norm_legit.default and torch.ops.aten.cudnn_batch_norm.default as point out in #111384, since if we move model to cuda before export also gives similar accuracy as * Acc@1 61.326 Acc@5 83.250. Versions (quantization)...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",48eb1baa44034092a86612289825854277082ae3d4da024b9c06f6699cdf1a4c
+BUNDLE-1387,bundle:bundle-1387,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: pt2-dispatcher (5 issues),issue_group,,module: pt2-dispatcher stale/low urgency,module: pt2-dispatcher,"Run one module: pt2-dispatcher stale-resolution sweep covering 5 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"121967, 158401, 161937, 168977, 169152",,5,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: pt2-dispatcher stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #168977: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, oncall: pt2, module: pt2-dispatcher; title: Easier way to correlate DebugMode with FX graph | issue #121967: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, oncall: pt2, module: pt2-dispatcher; title: [PT2.2] PyTorch dispacthing non core ATen ops in .compile mode for torch ops. | issue #169152: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, oncall: pt2, module: pt2-dispatcher; title: [d...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2094f135db634910c82faa20fbb32995eca29ccae0dc72ff4f3f8caa3020c32d
+BUNDLE-1388,bundle:bundle-1388,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: pybind (12 issues),issue_group,,module: pybind stale/low urgency,module: pybind,"Run one module: pybind stale-resolution sweep covering 12 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"7330, 19637, 19685, 23540, 34172, 43646, 49370, 49476, 55784, 91251, 94474, 162685",,12,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: pybind stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #162685: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: pybind; title: Prevent py::class_ with no pointer type from being used on structs that inherit from intrusive_ptr_target | issue #91251: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: pybind, shadow review; title: Potential bug found with pybind11 dec_ref while gil released | issue #49370: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: pybind; title: PyEval_Save...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",67a99c938ca694c02a555a665d48963cf2f0438db90d0cbe8f2ecd6c7f4a21b2
+BUNDLE-1389,bundle:bundle-1389,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: python array api (5 issues),issue_group,,module: python array api stale/low urgency,module: python array api,"Run one module: python array api stale-resolution sweep covering 5 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"56300, 62255, 116610, 118093, 150368",,5,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: python array api stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #150368: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: python array api; title: Support `copy` kwarg in `torch.reshape()` following Python array API standard | issue #116610: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: python array api; title: Align `torch.sign` with Array API | issue #62255: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: python array api; title: Support `torch.linalg.trace` | oat (excluding spec...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f561c33cd8d441b24fcbc880b75c88aab1c67c1122081b965babac418f209c5a
+BUNDLE-1390,bundle:bundle-1390,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: python frontend (89 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #108046: Enhanced Available Backend Discovery and Selection in PyTorch 2,module: python frontend,"Run one module: python frontend stale-resolution sweep covering 89 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"30702, 36380, 62148, 72388, 76106, 78513, 80377, 80549, 81104, 81186, 84353, 85302, 90284, 91039, 91809, 92251, 93121, 94233, 95882, 96615, 97189, 97823, 98948, 101185, 101930, 104935, 105062, 107701, 108046, 110080, 111819, 115614, 117762, 118488, 122081, 126006, 126014, 126021, 126034, 126041, 126045, 126244, 126247, 126250, 126253, 126404, 126947, 127009, 127010, 127019, 127020, 127083, 130512, 130529, 130693, 130807, 131463, 131769, 132483, 133564, 133985, 133998, 134978, 139200, 141295, 142129, 142852, 143208, 143306, 143334, 143440, 144671, 146765, 148536, 149815, 150124, 150284, 154557, 156701, 156956, 158125, 158738, 158871, 159739, 161886, 162790, 165799, 170426, 170573",,89,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: python frontend stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"('xla') d.is_built() d.is_available() etc It might be also useful to have a generic interface to work with any device type (similar to what #108046 proposed): torch.devices.is_available() # if any device type is available devices = torch.devices.available() # returns ['X'] (al... | because, at the moment, each device type has its own API. I would be happy to implement such an API if there is support from the commu...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",25e240bd07d7650ba8ac14f84560befebd7f745afc166b483e0620bf3f789044
+BUNDLE-1391,bundle:bundle-1391,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: python frontend (6 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #130217: `unique()` is not intuitively understandable at all.,module: python frontend,"Run one module: python frontend stale-resolution sweep covering 6 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"87371, 118736, 126037, 126039, 130217, 148743",,6,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: python frontend stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,guarantee nothing is missed just specify the len of that dimension from the input. Hopefully I made this part clear. NOTE: I disagree with: #130217 I find the simple 1d case understandable and usable. But with an additional dimension(s) it isn't that it couldn't be understanda... | same as #126037 (comment) said | ike this can be fixed by either removing the __new__ annotation or replacing the return type with {ty...,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e9157dcf0b29b84a1d1659eec2e8618656c5f1298c156179a605f0a2382eb20f
+BUNDLE-1392,bundle:bundle-1392,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: pytree (9 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #114392: [BUG][pytree] equal `dict`s do not imply equal leaves and equal treespecs,module: pytree,"Run one module: pytree stale-resolution sweep covering 9 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"109460, 111962, 112342, 112352, 113378, 114392, 116987, 159848, 183060",,9,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: pytree stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"This is a historical issue that was reported: #114392 But I want to point out that both JAX PyTree and PyTorch Python PyTree have their limitation: JAX PyTree does not preserve the key order of | See discussion here: #112342 (comment) Summary: Avoid polluting global registrations with custom registrations Persist custom registration info into TreeSpec - This avo | fn(): with using_pytree_namespace(""torch.vmap.Size...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d38433533b374ab2c3542aaeaf4483cd60a6dd209d90262db900406a22c18134
+BUNDLE-1393,bundle:bundle-1393,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: random (26 issues),issue_group,,module: random stale/low urgency batch 1,module: random,"Run one module: random stale-resolution sweep covering 26 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"22557, 25070, 25071, 29692, 32047, 33388, 33664, 37373, 38662, 43816, 56805, 64162, 66924, 67571, 79018, 79703, 88775, 89054, 89438, 94454, 106563, 114945, 127164, 128126, 133453, 157662",,26,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: random stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #89438: stale/low urgency; labels: feature, triaged, module: random; title: Allow `low` and `high` to be tensors in `torch.randint` | issue #157662: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: random; title: OffsetBasedRNGTracker's run_state_sync causes deadlock due to inconsistent broadcast order across ranks | issue #133453: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: random; title: [r...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",da8de741ab6b5817f7f054fb284920afc737e40e940449835359afb25ef7dd8f
+BUNDLE-1394,bundle:bundle-1394,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: reductions (6 issues),issue_group,,module: reductions stale/low urgency,module: reductions,"Run one module: reductions stale-resolution sweep covering 6 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"67457, 71629, 101334, 105790, 143561, 153360",,6,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: reductions stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #153360: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: reductions; title: torch.aminmax reducing over all dims should not accept keepdim | issue #143561: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: reductions, module: unsigned int; title: ""aten::any"" and ""aten::all"" behavior for unsigned tensors different than signed | issue #105790: stale/low urgency; labels: module: sparse, feature, triaged, module: reductio...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",621ea3fd9113caec4a0a7969dfe900a4d235729bf2d555de2210744f3813a250
+BUNDLE-1395,bundle:bundle-1395,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: rnn (22 issues),issue_group,,module: rnn stale/low urgency batch 1,module: rnn,"Run one module: rnn stale-resolution sweep covering 22 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"1794, 7032, 9193, 12482, 12715, 26110, 30150, 37731, 43072, 47439, 64635, 65890, 68377, 80605, 82577, 88643, 89357, 135198, 145368, 149194, 149227, 169213",,22,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: rnn stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #169213: stale/low urgency; labels: module: rnn, triaged; title: CPU bad-free in `torch.nn.utils.rnn.pad_packed_sequence` / `unpack_sequence` | issue #149194: stale/low urgency; labels: module: rnn, triaged, topic: performance; title: LSTM slow on PackedSequence | issue #149227: stale/low urgency; labels: module: rnn, triaged; title: Unexpected behaviour in using torch.nn.utils.rnn.pack_padded_sequence API |...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d871916f49c78c081fc2d0ed22cb158ac1cc2c994c674eafe50d860d275559ad
+BUNDLE-1396,bundle:bundle-1396,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: rocm (64 issues),issue_group,,module: rocm stale/low urgency batch 1,module: rocm,"Run one module: rocm stale-resolution sweep covering 64 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"84044, 91630, 96643, 100795, 103608, 104147, 106529, 106608, 138360, 145608, 159226, 162606, 168503, 168515, 168516, 168517, 168518, 168519, 168522, 168523, 168524, 168525, 168526, 168527, 168528, 168529, 168532, 168533, 168534, 168535, 168784, 168788, 168789, 168791, 168792, 168801, 168806, 168807, 168831, 168832, 168833, 168834, 168835, 168836, 168837, 168838, 168839, 168840, 168841, 168842, 168843, 168844, 168845, 168846, 168847, 168848, 168849, 168850, 168851, 168852, 168853, 168854, 168935, 169378",,64,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: rocm stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #168935: stale/low urgency; labels: module: rocm, triaged; title: [ROCm] enabling compile should not cause signficiant accuracy loss on many important models | issue #162606: stale/low urgency; labels: module: rocm, triaged, module: tensorpipe, rocm; title: Tensorpipe - ROCm support | issue #169378: stale/low urgency; labels: module: rocm, triaged, rocm; title: [rocm triton 3.6] rocm-periodic-dynamo-benchmar...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7d20baa45029a4608da840771cad7cb736b7962e9c8d81a36ae92f82ab0420c0
+BUNDLE-1397,bundle:bundle-1397,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: rocm (14 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 3 issues - issue #168720: TestModule: test/test_cuda.py::TestCudaMallocAsync,module: rocm,"Run one module: rocm stale-resolution sweep covering 14 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"64426, 69233, 95921, 168536, 168537, 168720, 168721, 168722, 168742, 168743, 168798, 168800, 168855, 168858",,14,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: rocm stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,text Source file: test/test_cuda.py Test class: TestCudaMallocAsync Test name: test_memory_profiler_viz Defined at line: 4139 Parent issue: #168720 Code reference: https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/blob/main/test/test_cuda.py cc @sunway513 @jithunnair-amd @pruthvistony @ROCmS... | ntext Source file: test/test_cuda.py Test class: TestCudaMallocAsync Test name: test_device_memory_used Defined at line: 4847 Parent i...,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f45fbf32362cf4174bf9f6fbf1ba945bf2a824219dbd4238c3aa9c24970c3993
+BUNDLE-1398,bundle:bundle-1398,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: rpc (79 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 3 issues - issue #80017: RPC init fails and crashes when world_size is greater than 18,module: rpc,"Run one module: rpc stale-resolution sweep covering 79 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"23110, 24130, 24946, 26119, 26446, 26759, 27099, 27517, 27671, 28245, 28882, 29402, 30633, 30807, 31228, 31752, 31842, 31937, 31979, 32130, 32269, 32363, 32565, 32752, 32784, 33115, 33363, 33482, 33738, 33982, 33983, 33989, 33990, 33991, 34080, 34754, 35758, 37136, 37529, 38118, 38245, 39124, 39280, 39355, 39411, 40266, 40880, 40936, 40974, 41369, 41561, 42345, 42544, 42705, 43561, 44084, 44771, 45044, 46904, 49101, 49911, 50346, 50462, 50468, 51778, 53696, 55757, 56244, 57475, 57960, 65022, 71029, 73721, 73722, 78367, 80017, 80104, 85607, 104620",,79,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: rpc stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"_worker_threads=64) # ADD THIS ) worker_init() # no-op rpc.shutdown() if __name__ == '__main__': main() I've filed this as an issue before (#80104), but will mark it as high-pri since its been hit twice now so we can provide a better error message | ocesses, ), nprocs=tot_processes, join=True, ) if __name__ == '__main__': main() TODO: we should error out with a more descriptive message, #80104 | 🐛 Describe the bug...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0b105970f52ca683abd3c1f96647b8b2c5fa734abc0ac0f1386e752d86142f4c
+BUNDLE-1399,bundle:bundle-1399,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: sanitizers (7 issues),issue_group,,module: sanitizers stale/low urgency,module: sanitizers,"Run one module: sanitizers stale-resolution sweep covering 7 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"88185, 88944, 88945, 88947, 88949, 88950, 90526",,7,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: sanitizers stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #90526: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: sanitizers; title: valgrind failure `Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)` | issue #88950: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: sanitizers; title: `torch.nn.functional.embedding_bag` Trigger RuntimeError under UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer | issue #88949: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: sanitizers; title: `torch.set_rng...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b9d181289dab95c56b0af4c2edbdec435d9eda76100dd14fca4f5a57667fa804
+BUNDLE-1400,bundle:bundle-1400,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: scatter & gather ops (11 issues),issue_group,,module: scatter & gather ops stale/low urgency,module: scatter & gather ops,"Run one module: scatter & gather ops stale-resolution sweep covering 11 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"6850, 31394, 56464, 71300, 77231, 80439, 83980, 94083, 108569, 124783, 151978",,11,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: scatter & gather ops stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #151978: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: scatter & gather ops; title: torch.gather returns incorrect output on cuda after unsqueezing and expanding with double precision | issue #71300: stale/low urgency; labels: module: sparse, triaged, module: scatter & gather ops; title: Kernel fusion for Gather, Apply, Scatter (GAS) model | issue #124783: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: scatter &...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b77e206913c087387ca055f100574aee9abde9e5995188375c4ab4349d201a2c
+BUNDLE-1401,bundle:bundle-1401,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: scipy compatibility (1 issue),issue_group,,#119462 Python 3.12 CPU TestBinaryUfuncsCPU.test_cumulative_trapezoid_cpu is failing,module: scipy compatibility,"Run one module: scipy compatibility stale-resolution sweep covering 1 issue: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,119462,,1,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: scipy compatibility stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #119462: stale/low urgency; labels: module: tests, triaged, module: scipy compatibility; title: Python 3.12 CPU TestBinaryUfuncsCPU.test_cumulative_trapezoid_cpu is failing",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b1e1692b266ba5ed19f7f8c0416e6da2b090520b2da22fe276abb9e3b7adc8d2
+BUNDLE-1402,bundle:bundle-1402,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: sdpa (23 issues),issue_group,,module: sdpa stale/low urgency batch 1,module: sdpa,"Run one module: sdpa stale-resolution sweep covering 23 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"103836, 112015, 113524, 116237, 116350, 119188, 119653, 121465, 124718, 125070, 132700, 135590, 137486, 138907, 144960, 145040, 146848, 147585, 152257, 158969, 162592, 163400, 167754",,23,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: sdpa stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #116350: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, enhancement, module: sdpa; title: RuntimeError: derivative for aten::_scaled_dot_product_flash_attention_backward is not implemented | issue #163400: stale/low urgency; labels: module: sparse, triaged, module: sdpa; title: Add Flash Dynamic Mask Attention (FDMA) as an SDPA backend for sparse, extremely long-context attention | issue #167754: stale/low urgency; lab...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6499fbfffc8b91b96bfc8c65143625aa55a2f5fd1b42a13c6b1830a44a6d7f0f
+BUNDLE-1403,bundle:bundle-1403,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: serialization (67 issues),issue_group,,module: serialization stale/low urgency batch 4,module: serialization,"Run one module: serialization stale-resolution sweep covering 67 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"5106, 8430, 10577, 21745, 24139, 24432, 25137, 25892, 26567, 30867, 31615, 32165, 32167, 32706, 37985, 38643, 43672, 44295, 47753, 53185, 53708, 57843, 58671, 60165, 60933, 61923, 62271, 62273, 63720, 64458, 65604, 65694, 76108, 78720, 79145, 87276, 88320, 91325, 94238, 98187, 100244, 103895, 109791, 112395, 120708, 124195, 125622, 126154, 126952, 127001, 127525, 129356, 132024, 132067, 132991, 134680, 137409, 141350, 146885, 149224, 149313, 149545, 157624, 158187, 161960, 166686, 169763",,67,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: serialization stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #60933: stale/low urgency; labels: module: serialization, triaged; title: jit.load error when changed Folder Name | issue #62273: stale/low urgency; labels: module: serialization, triaged; title: Serialization map_location silently ignores xla/mlc/meta (any serialization mechanism that skips storage) | issue #62271: stale/low urgency; labels: module: tests, module: serialization, triaged; title: Refactor ser...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7b93e9346a24c37b8e00c60633e3575f56e6bf06382a70f42b9af3b7886dd5c1
+BUNDLE-1404,bundle:bundle-1404,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: shape checking (1 issue),issue_group,,#56542 CrossEntropyLoss target shape expectation is inconsistent with BCEWithLogits,module: shape checking,"Run one module: shape checking stale-resolution sweep covering 1 issue: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,56542,,1,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: shape checking stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #56542: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: shape checking; title: CrossEntropyLoss target shape expectation is inconsistent with BCEWithLogits",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a60d2f28943dd1febf12a8ef76a228f5cda15155722f321ba0d7d09aba6e3064
+BUNDLE-1405,bundle:bundle-1405,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: sorting and selection (15 issues),issue_group,,module: sorting and selection stale/low urgency,module: sorting and selection,"Run one module: sorting and selection stale-resolution sweep covering 15 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"11072, 19150, 29398, 32305, 32306, 43867, 57301, 60825, 67597, 68610, 80296, 88142, 88227, 108642, 140396",,15,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: sorting and selection stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #88227: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: sorting and selection; title: Enable `torch.topk` to support `stable` flag | issue #140396: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, enhancement, has workaround, module: sorting and selection; title: Optional ```clamp_k``` Argument for Handling Out-of-Range Values in ```torch.topk``` | issue #29398: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: sorting and selecti...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d6e9b33223376af128a4386543e8ef66b7dff687a71ecd5b51d1b8c3647751e4
+BUNDLE-1406,bundle:bundle-1406,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: sparse (128 issues),issue_group,,module: sparse stale/low urgency batch 9,module: sparse,"Run one module: sparse stale-resolution sweep covering 128 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"1462, 3152, 3898, 4247, 4829, 6257, 14112, 16187, 16328, 30402, 31742, 31942, 34375, 34951, 39437, 43904, 46705, 46980, 48892, 52738, 54309, 55453, 55944, 58735, 58814, 64079, 65230, 65400, 67092, 69348, 69516, 69665, 70926, 71156, 71678, 72065, 74454, 74855, 75721, 76519, 76638, 78422, 81648, 81650, 81979, 82140, 82494, 85642, 86111, 86494, 87433, 88053, 89080, 91599, 91615, 94185, 95463, 96428, 98495, 98861, 98929, 98947, 99797, 100158, 100411, 101189, 101385, 102162, 103643, 104845, 105529, 105548, 105916, 106141, 107102, 107451, 107590, 108102, 108483, 109194, 109462, 111509, 114808, 114871, 116565, 116633, 117146, 117242, 117243, 117244, 117247, 117248, 117250, 117256, 117259, 119076, 119711, 120989, 121797, 122089, 122711, 123500, 124778, 125493, 129843, 131318, 132028, 134396, 134953, 135091, 137542, 138168, 140778, 141144, 141472, 144210, 144688, 146910, 146976, 148548, 153497, 154419, 155333, 160517, 161357, 162482, 164707, 169119",,128,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: sparse stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #14112: stale/low urgency; labels: module: sparse, triaged; title: [sparse] add descriptions and examples for methods at torch.sparse doc page | issue #52738: stale/low urgency; labels: module: sparse, module: tests, triaged; title: [OpInfo] Improvements for sparse ops tests | issue #64079: stale/low urgency; labels: module: sparse, triaged; title: torch.equal does not support sparse tensors | issue #16328:...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",175ede6cfd0858ac914ea791196701d4efab16c0a53a6ea6047d0c44cfe231f0
+BUNDLE-1407,bundle:bundle-1407,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: sparse (6 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #69786: Implement aten::equal for sparse tensors,module: sparse,"Run one module: sparse stale-resolution sweep covering 6 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"14489, 69786, 95776, 98675, 150277, 152226",,6,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: sparse stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"h the following code. If the commented codes is enabled, the result will output False, which is as expected. In some previous issues (e.g., #69786), there is a similar lack of support for sparse tensor in torch.equal and other APIs. It seems that there are still many APIs that... | exing can be formulated as a element wise multiplication with a sparse mask tensor having ones values and indices corresponding to idx...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3bf3ccfa0a1ef4a04c39ba3205a1f29e0fc89924d71324be4879fc0f0ccf4f19
+BUNDLE-1408,bundle:bundle-1408,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: special (10 issues),issue_group,,module: special stale/low urgency,module: special,"Run one module: special stale-resolution sweep covering 10 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"69451, 69452, 69453, 71071, 74940, 86326, 108948, 137888, 140701, 140796",,10,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: special stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #108948: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: special, topic: new features; title: Add Lambert W function as torch.special.lambertw | issue #137888: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: special; title: Inconsistent digamma result with other frameworks (1e-6 difference) | issue #140796: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: special; title: inconsistency in ```torch.special.xlog1py``` on CP...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",25e6c0906c70561c56eb2bb80e3da16d3399a1fde87e6e0af3a2c02522bddf52
+BUNDLE-1409,bundle:bundle-1409,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: static linking (4 issues),issue_group,,module: static linking stale/low urgency,module: static linking,"Run one module: static linking stale-resolution sweep covering 4 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"46464, 48167, 48450, 57065",,4,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: static linking stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #57065: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: static linking; title: Static Linking Pytorch | issue #46464: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: static linking, enhancement; title: [META] Assert that expected libraries appear in libtorch | issue #48450: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: static linking; title: Qt 5.14.2, libtorch1.7.0 cuda10.2，Error after using header file | issue #4816...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b765d132a92d6a68782602c2fc159197dfefa4304bb01e4b877043464540e5b5
+BUNDLE-1410,bundle:bundle-1410,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: structured kernels (10 issues),issue_group,,module: structured kernels stale/low urgency,module: structured kernels,"Run one module: structured kernels stale-resolution sweep covering 10 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"52274, 53141, 56691, 57949, 63057, 64644, 69831, 70242, 70678, 74788",,10,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: structured kernels stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #74788: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, enhancement, module: structured kernels; title: [Structured] Make it possible to override create_out implementation on a per dispatch key basis (structured sparse) | issue #69831: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: type promotion, module: structured kernels; title: Incorrect error for integer `out=` dtypes when a float is expected. | issue #64644: stale/lo...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",fe96eb1a3c27036af6480e797753e14a0585455a5659ae05221bba40b09dccee
+BUNDLE-1411,bundle:bundle-1411,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: symm_mem (1 issue),issue_group,,#167765 [RFC] Extend MemPool support to SymmMem CUDA backend,module: symm_mem,"Run one module: symm_mem stale-resolution sweep covering 1 issue: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,167765,,1,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: symm_mem stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #167765: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: symm_mem; title: [RFC] Extend MemPool support to SymmMem CUDA backend",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",350817f37221e7b5f3631db13dddc2a8d6edb9ffe8e0adfd02b36c48d7ee3028
+BUNDLE-1412,bundle:bundle-1412,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: tbb (1 issue),issue_group,,#90555 [RFC] Add torch.backends.tbb.is_available(),module: tbb,"Run one module: tbb stale-resolution sweep covering 1 issue: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,90555,,1,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: tbb stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #90555: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, enhancement, module: tbb; title: [RFC] Add torch.backends.tbb.is_available()",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a908d9a2c5e5f695ff8aea530b5b8dde6554658a65fddadb69ce6216d90bccc9
+BUNDLE-1413,bundle:bundle-1413,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: tensor creation (12 issues),issue_group,,module: tensor creation stale/low urgency,module: tensor creation,"Run one module: tensor creation stale-resolution sweep covering 12 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"33040, 38197, 38470, 40419, 51112, 68703, 73832, 82230, 82242, 87861, 92920, 98673",,12,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: tensor creation stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #68703: stale/low urgency; labels: feature, triaged, module: tensor creation; title: Feature request: Extend `torch.eye` for creating a batch of eye matrices | issue #98673: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, enhancement, has workaround, module: tensor creation; title: [ux] Non-blocking tensor constructors | issue #51112: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: tensor creation; title: torch.tensor(x) fa...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a34e73c38bfbe302a9c29e23e404e21a5ebbddd6240bd9972c9edd7c345348c8
+BUNDLE-1414,bundle:bundle-1414,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: tensorboard (47 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 4 issues - issue #24904: tensorboard add_graph error,module: tensorboard,"Run one module: tensorboard stale-resolution sweep covering 47 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"23749, 23771, 24234, 24236, 24468, 24904, 26097, 26790, 27030, 27300, 28206, 30459, 32651, 38564, 38614, 38980, 39370, 39537, 42861, 44931, 45481, 46202, 46739, 47627, 49284, 54269, 61186, 63725, 67989, 73131, 73909, 79120, 79647, 88304, 91887, 93017, 95460, 102501, 104029, 107536, 107820, 113942, 125298, 139269, 144677, 147317, 154855",,47,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: tensorboard stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"gradient, but if I only passed in one GPU, it would not throw that error. My original error when passing in multiple GPUs seems related to #30459, #28206, and #24904, although I'm not sure if the error in from this code snippet is related. cc @suo | t, but if I only passed in one GPU, it would not throw that error. My original error when passing in multiple GPUs seems related to #30459, #28206, and #24904, althoug...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f4fe048ba904b60f6032daee85d1428793f90dc0dd7bb100084c47c10d0308fb
+BUNDLE-1415,bundle:bundle-1415,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: tensoriterator (2 issues),issue_group,,module: tensoriterator stale/low urgency,module: tensoriterator,"Run one module: tensoriterator stale-resolution sweep covering 2 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"33166, 70238",,2,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: tensoriterator stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #70238: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: TensorIterator; title: `TensorIterator`: refactor `build_ternary_op` to match binary versions | issue #33166: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, enhancement, module: vectorization, module: TensorIterator; title: TensorIterator does not work with different input/output types",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a945c3e5309d2a4e6be9ad2edd632e500ce6a45141a65f3e399efbc997d7e841
+BUNDLE-1416,bundle:bundle-1416,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: tensorpipe (1 issue),issue_group,,#39082 [TensorPipe] Avoid wrapping the future message in order to do atomic test-and-set,module: tensorpipe,"Run one module: tensorpipe stale-resolution sweep covering 1 issue: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,39082,,1,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: tensorpipe stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #39082: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: tensorpipe; title: [TensorPipe] Avoid wrapping the future message in order to do atomic test-and-set",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d0abd353cc1540583296a56cfe2a695b248e7ccb8fb4b53353bdb66912ecdb1b
+BUNDLE-1417,bundle:bundle-1417,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: testing (28 issues),issue_group,,module: testing stale/low urgency batch 2,module: testing,"Run one module: testing stale-resolution sweep covering 28 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"55331, 61758, 72194, 74320, 74328, 74500, 74531, 74642, 78761, 82669, 83019, 97761, 98977, 99248, 104875, 106828, 111126, 111564, 116762, 118352, 122017, 125028, 139252, 140560, 141758, 142029, 152647, 162964",,28,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: testing stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #99248: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: testing; title: tools PYTHONPATH trick in run_test.py does not work reliably | issue #98977: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: testing; title: [BE] Dedup the functorch skipOps mechanism and the common_method_invocations one | issue #97761: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: testing; title: torch.testing.assert_close: allow check to fail o...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",14c7bb366d89560ebada303b013f29c0e9bad59c8c04a131a2997f631719d38c
+BUNDLE-1418,bundle:bundle-1418,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: tests (94 issues),issue_group,,module: tests stale/low urgency batch 6,module: tests,"Run one module: tests stale-resolution sweep covering 94 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"3791, 5096, 5326, 6135, 8577, 11496, 15142, 19016, 19177, 20245, 23103, 23849, 29717, 29720, 30611, 32132, 33089, 33249, 35553, 35636, 35648, 35651, 38188, 38189, 38190, 38241, 38677, 40086, 40470, 41187, 41337, 42498, 43663, 43677, 44159, 46102, 46222, 46272, 46276, 53256, 53623, 53627, 54278, 54282, 54629, 55174, 55340, 55583, 56023, 59185, 60748, 61825, 62354, 62449, 63337, 63781, 64048, 64106, 64284, 65522, 66224, 66403, 67008, 67773, 71575, 72915, 74052, 74187, 74544, 74613, 74911, 76127, 76128, 76609, 76611, 76733, 77380, 77589, 78729, 80221, 84014, 84538, 84972, 86381, 86694, 94705, 98904, 115202, 121162, 138673, 141963, 143965, 159510, 162004",,94,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: tests stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #38677: stale/low urgency; labels: module: tests, triaged; title: TestCase.assertEqual does not distinguish Python builtin types and single-element Tensor | issue #3791: stale/low urgency; labels: module: tests, triaged, enhancement; title: Make pytest stop printing docstrings in its default diagnostic output | issue #38241: stale/low urgency; labels: module: tests, triaged; title: SIGXCPU at test_cholesky_s...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",78873daa3ab31a5685fd0444fea73e9cdecb389b1e237d8539c39e6efea35f03
+BUNDLE-1419,bundle:bundle-1419,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: tf32 (2 issues),issue_group,,module: tf32 stale/low urgency,module: tf32,"Run one module: tf32 stale-resolution sweep covering 2 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"69921, 76025",,2,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: tf32 stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #76025: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: tf32; title: Numerical instability: matrix multiplication got different results on cpu and gpu | issue #69921: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: tf32; title: Context manager to enable/disabled TensorFloat32 on demand",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",dcff25e30bd9fa51c985e581b3e8fe3c4492379063a71102e6b9b6c6e2d2cf2f
+BUNDLE-1420,bundle:bundle-1420,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: third_party (3 issues),issue_group,,module: third_party stale/low urgency,module: third_party,"Run one module: third_party stale-resolution sweep covering 3 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"70392, 149324, 150118",,3,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: third_party stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #150118: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: releng, triaged, module: third_party; title: PyTorch 2.6 License Issues | issue #149324: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: third_party, oncall: pt2; title: Unguarded Usage of Facebook Internal Code? | issue #70392: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: third_party; title: third_party/breakpad/ compilation failure",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",089fb5a228ed4364ceb2394077a08fd8603ec8cd88ab53302edd226c7edffc98
+BUNDLE-1421,bundle:bundle-1421,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: torchbind (5 issues),issue_group,,module: torchbind stale/low urgency,module: torchbind,"Run one module: torchbind stale-resolution sweep covering 5 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"42949, 42950, 85392, 133689, 170458",,5,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: torchbind stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #170458: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: torchbind, topic: performance; title: must_in_dispatch takes a long time in torch registered ops | issue #133689: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: torchbind, vllm-compile, module: vllm; title: [torchbind x PT2] Handle vllm's ScalarType | issue #85392: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: torchbind; title: please report a bug to PyTorch. E...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a173b089d843b3e4d870e280a98781fe08a75fc75e62f0b04af06a309cf71014
+BUNDLE-1422,bundle:bundle-1422,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: type promotion (6 issues),issue_group,,module: type promotion stale/low urgency,module: type promotion,"Run one module: type promotion stale-resolution sweep covering 6 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"32098, 37895, 40891, 50213, 71058, 71918",,6,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: type promotion stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #71918: stale/low urgency; labels: feature, triaged, module: type promotion; title: Support mixed python scalar/tensor types for torch.clamp's min/max args | issue #71058: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: type promotion; title: `torch.Tensor.where` cannot work when `y` is float | issue #50213: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: type promotion; title: torch.float_power out= and inplace var...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3ee7c413fcad8696c82804795f6489b917439ac022dca96cb9394c5d8e4a7d5d
+BUNDLE-1423,bundle:bundle-1423,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: typing (39 issues),issue_group,,module: typing stale/low urgency batch 2,module: typing,"Run one module: typing stale-resolution sweep covering 39 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"38240, 38876, 39009, 39670, 40659, 42969, 42971, 43091, 43617, 45414, 47027, 50031, 60766, 61233, 73359, 76465, 81046, 82095, 83313, 98260, 101080, 103375, 103393, 103761, 103787, 103798, 103800, 103803, 115806, 117449, 125390, 131054, 131432, 141869, 148552, 150257, 157266, 167119, 169073",,39,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: typing stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #98260: stale/low urgency; labels: module: typing, triaged; title: Broken mypy check in test_type_hints.py::TestTypeHints::test_doc_examples | issue #83313: stale/low urgency; labels: module: typing, triaged; title: torch.Tag doesn't have accurate mypy info | issue #39009: stale/low urgency; labels: module: typing, triaged; title: Missing OneCycleLR and MultiplicativeLR in lr_scheduler.pyi | issue #38240: st...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",892e89d4f996470bd20918db25c2025cc1d83e8013fc2082a0a404fb59eeeb24
+BUNDLE-1424,bundle:bundle-1424,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: undefined reference (2 issues),issue_group,,module: undefined reference stale/low urgency,module: undefined reference,"Run one module: undefined reference stale-resolution sweep covering 2 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"56144, 58591",,2,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: undefined reference stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #56144: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: undefined reference; title: libtorch static linking results in undefined references to onnx_torch and caffe2::EmbeddingLookup | issue #58591: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: undefined reference; title: link error on BatchNormImplBase<D, Derived>::pretty_print when using icpc",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f8f09b487ea45084fc8a76dcb22f10c05dbf28548c1f2eb94955926d6ae60322
+BUNDLE-1425,bundle:bundle-1425,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: unknown (1 issue),issue_group,,#70180 Can you provide the torch.trt module to directly convert the pytorch weights to tensorrt?,module: unknown,"Run one module: unknown stale-resolution sweep covering 1 issue: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,70180,,1,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: unknown stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #70180: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, enhancement, module: unknown; title: Can you provide the torch.trt module to directly convert the pytorch weights to tensorrt?",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",bd04deb9044e1adb1c20392b40c971cb89dcec929e2a64b7b5e630a4786cad41
+BUNDLE-1426,bundle:bundle-1426,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: user triton (3 issues),issue_group,,module: user triton stale/low urgency,module: user triton,"Run one module: user triton stale-resolution sweep covering 3 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"141686, 152608, 155519",,3,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: user triton stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #155519: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: user triton; title: [Tracking] Triton 3.2 deprecation | issue #152608: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: releng, triaged, module: user triton; title: [triton pin update] Run Inductor CI on pin updates for Triton and the PyTorch nightly branch | issue #141686: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, oncall: pt2, module: user triton; title: [PT2] Fine-grained c...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9c4c22e452ffa305e388bca2a08033ad7b789dddcb7c19967a1c23271309ed89
+BUNDLE-1427,bundle:bundle-1427,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: ux (9 issues),issue_group,,module: ux stale/low urgency,module: ux,"Run one module: ux stale-resolution sweep covering 9 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"27147, 28223, 39260, 58820, 60956, 67745, 68575, 69288, 127737",,9,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: ux stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #127737: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: ux; title: `torch.tensor()` can also be used with a list of the `float`, `complex` or `bool` type tensors which have a single element each | issue #69288: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: ux, Stale; title: Inplace and `out` variants for `positive` operator in PyTorch | issue #67745: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, enhancement, module: ux, mo...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",83279674abc6257b0a07ef4062475ad22f841d7b9776ccfd9c43b8c7a3ebe4ad
+BUNDLE-1428,bundle:bundle-1428,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: vectorization (3 issues),issue_group,,module: vectorization stale/low urgency,module: vectorization,"Run one module: vectorization stale-resolution sweep covering 3 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"10956, 43033, 56187",,3,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: vectorization stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #10956: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: vectorization; title: Better dev docs for writing native CPU kernels with Vec256 | issue #56187: stale/low urgency; labels: feature, triaged, module: vectorization; title: AVX512 and Vec512 | issue #43033: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: vectorization, better-engineering; title: No vectorization for int8 and uint8",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8b550671105e7bf107367e20c45c206ab151db7e3d84de4ddc4be87fa7a4e166
+BUNDLE-1429,bundle:bundle-1429,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: viewing and reshaping (12 issues),issue_group,,module: viewing and reshaping stale/low urgency,module: viewing and reshaping,"Run one module: viewing and reshaping stale-resolution sweep covering 12 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"10978, 27276, 57095, 59617, 64709, 69433, 76891, 78759, 106173, 107026, 153542, 169870",,12,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: viewing and reshaping stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #169870: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: viewing and reshaping, oncall: pt2; title: Capturing ViewAndMutationMeta for training graphs for PyTorch 2.8 | issue #153542: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: viewing and reshaping; title: torch.set_ on a view does not sever view relation | issue #10978: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, enhancement, module: viewing and reshaping; title: [feat...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",cc770cdd5d12315a0f09c85d77357e4dbcfa4933ab620e53142c8b4c2d170222
+BUNDLE-1430,bundle:bundle-1430,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: vision (22 issues),issue_group,,module: vision stale/low urgency batch 1,module: vision,"Run one module: vision stale-resolution sweep covering 22 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"4958, 6934, 10719, 15864, 18998, 21477, 27740, 31471, 31685, 32402, 32751, 38009, 38619, 38630, 38709, 39993, 40756, 42012, 43123, 49752, 53890, 79130",,22,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: vision stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #6934: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: vision, function request; title: Feature request: SSIM/MS-SSIM | issue #79130: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: vision; title: torchvision.models.mobilenetv3 can't save pre-trained model to custom dir? | issue #49752: stale/low urgency; labels: caffe2, triaged, module: vision; title: IndexError: Input _features.0.weight is undefined! | issue #4958...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",34c7ff5c25be35fb4228c2cf8a7d9416d39b05bc3afe2ea0e9429397336ec313
+BUNDLE-1431,bundle:bundle-1431,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: vllm (6 issues),issue_group,,module: vllm stale/low urgency,module: vllm,"Run one module: vllm stale-resolution sweep covering 6 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"148983, 150190, 166733, 169133, 170495, 170563",,6,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: vllm stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #170563: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: vllm; title: vLLM v1/distributed/test_eagle_dp.py Tests failing on PyTorch 2.10 | issue #170495: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: vllm; title: vLLM Blackwell Fusion and Compile Tests failing PyTorch 2.10 | issue #169133: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: vllm; title: vLLM tlparse sometimes missing compilation_metrics | issue #166733: s...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",97bf5b1bb0bde5ae893de014dcfc18b11263325463363dea50f07a8fd3cc5b10
+BUNDLE-1432,bundle:bundle-1432,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: vmap (6 issues),issue_group,,module: vmap stale/low urgency,module: vmap,"Run one module: vmap stale-resolution sweep covering 6 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"47378, 52295, 94593, 130768, 141890, 151286",,6,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: vmap stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #151286: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: vmap; title: vmap- out of memory | issue #141890: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: vmap; title: Does vmap accept None out_dims? | issue #130768: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: vmap; title: Migrate gradcheck with check_batched_grad=True to use the new torch.vmap | issue #94593: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: vmap; title:...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",251b79a0d133556223c7fd8c7dd9c725ba38b59ff63359c94ab424056ac6cbbe
+BUNDLE-1433,bundle:bundle-1433,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: vulkan (13 issues),issue_group,,module: vulkan stale/low urgency,module: vulkan,"Run one module: vulkan stale-resolution sweep covering 13 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"72046, 72775, 77733, 82316, 89105, 89601, 90920, 92285, 95956, 106549, 122641, 123702, 142331",,13,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: vulkan stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #142331: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: vulkan; title: torch.is_vulkan_available() false in windows | issue #123702: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: vulkan; title: Issue with Vulkan Device for nn.Conv2d Operation | issue #90920: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: vulkan; title: Support for Transformer Models on Android with Vulkan Backend | issue #106549: stale/low urgency;...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",dfdc57deb5980693773f75840a33415d111c7ca7c9d6ba189bca6acb4b9f242d
+BUNDLE-1434,bundle:bundle-1434,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: windows (11 issues),issue_group,,module: windows stale/low urgency,module: windows,"Run one module: windows stale-resolution sweep covering 11 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"21176, 39226, 42095, 55869, 68405, 89688, 101968, 114565, 146944, 155667, 162786",,11,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: windows stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #162786: stale/low urgency; labels: module: windows, triaged; title: [MSVC] LINK : fatal error LNK1181: cannot open input file 'sleef\src\libm\CMakeFiles\mkrename.dir\mkrename.c.obj' | issue #155667: stale/low urgency; labels: module: windows, triaged; title: [libtorch] Debug and Release should be shipped together on Windows | issue #21176: stale/low urgency; labels: module: windows, triaged; title: Adding a...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",deec543b3d7868e7091f12b88cbd96c9240ee4a506e7e9aa1ce8ae5307c933c3
+BUNDLE-1435,bundle:bundle-1435,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: wsl (2 issues),issue_group,,module: wsl stale/low urgency,module: wsl,"Run one module: wsl stale-resolution sweep covering 2 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"97503, 111187",,2,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: wsl stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #111187: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, module: wsl; title: torch.distributed.DistBackendError: NCCL error in: ../torch/csrc/distributed/c10d/ProcessGroupNCCL.cpp:1331, unhandled cuda error (run with NCCL_DEBUG=INFO for details) | issue #97503: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: wsl; title: torch.cppExtension won't work with wsl2",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4dd22556931a34d51facf2819cd70b5575c65bd8ca90b194ac0544d4182e7964
+BUNDLE-1436,bundle:bundle-1436,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: xla (8 issues),issue_group,,module: xla stale/low urgency,module: xla,"Run one module: xla stale-resolution sweep covering 8 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"65131, 65132, 77808, 92909, 97676, 111033, 113382, 130985",,8,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: xla stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #92909: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: xla; title: [RFC] XLA Lazy Backend Support In DistributedTensor API | issue #130985: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: xla; title: Runtime error when running huggingface pretrained model with torch-xla | issue #111033: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: xla, oncall: fx; title: `CapabilityBasedPartitioner` returns invalid partitions. | iss...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",606f4d50b4bbd9dfeb3f55cedf3d03e292dc26918e45f8e12ae0e669dd7e7212
+BUNDLE-1437,bundle:bundle-1437,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: xnnpack (1 issue),issue_group,,#36517 XNNPACK operators are not actually registered under xnnpack namespace,module: xnnpack,"Run one module: xnnpack stale-resolution sweep covering 1 issue: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,36517,,1,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: xnnpack stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #36517: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, better-engineering, module: xnnpack; title: XNNPACK operators are not actually registered under xnnpack namespace",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c76dfec79d4abbfc828dec6275e13b7c53909ac59266602697c81e5b9633603d
+BUNDLE-1438,bundle:bundle-1438,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: module: xpu (6 issues),issue_group,,module: xpu stale/low urgency,module: xpu,"Run one module: xpu stale-resolution sweep covering 6 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"144766, 151308, 157714, 160787, 162837, 167170",,6,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a module: xpu stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #160787: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: xpu; title: [Intel Arc XPU] NaN Values in Gradients after SDPA with is_causal | issue #151308: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: xpu; title: [Intel GPU][UT failure] Depthwise conv related UT failures | issue #144766: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, module: xpu; title: Matmul with int32 parameters on Intel GPU leads to errors | issue #167170:...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",81749d0810f8fa7d13bf6852264d4c56819b20e7cfdd232a25ca06de410fa5f3
+BUNDLE-1439,bundle:bundle-1439,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: oncall: cpu inductor (7 issues),issue_group,,oncall: cpu inductor stale/low urgency,oncall: cpu inductor,"Run one oncall: cpu inductor stale-resolution sweep covering 7 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"93477, 101273, 119181, 126691, 130948, 133458, 158664",,7,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a oncall: cpu inductor stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #158664: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, skipped, oncall: pt2, oncall: cpu inductor; title: DISABLED test_sum_all_cpu_float64 (__main__.TestReductionsCPU) | issue #133458: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, oncall: pt2, oncall: cpu inductor; title: [CPU] jx_nest_base AMP both inductor and eager performance regression in 2024-08-10 nightly release | issue #130948: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, onca...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",caa6756a6869197ca6d88bf3c920b96fcb3e7e4de5b9143ce9bdc2b5be5b61c5
+BUNDLE-1440,bundle:bundle-1440,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: oncall: distributed (116 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #55571: Update TCPStore.wait() error message to be more friendly,oncall: distributed,"Run one oncall: distributed stale-resolution sweep covering 116 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"7471, 8290, 10471, 14632, 17041, 18920, 19330, 21015, 22049, 22128, 22340, 22400, 22455, 22788, 23230, 25417, 25552, 28552, 29115, 30723, 41485, 44544, 50820, 55571, 57278, 66627, 68104, 75512, 92132, 104507, 109401, 116393, 117883, 120466, 120847, 121519, 121650, 123070, 123528, 124228, 125173, 125620, 125800, 126216, 126347, 126773, 126899, 127517, 128066, 128128, 128204, 128696, 128699, 128706, 128821, 128963, 129477, 129672, 130137, 130621, 131450, 131691, 132428, 132649, 132696, 133092, 133119, 133224, 133380, 133761, 134190, 134668, 134803, 134945, 134960, 135267, 137006, 137245, 137610, 137969, 137974, 138811, 139304, 139324, 140712, 141335, 141746, 142229, 143969, 145043, 145263, 145592, 145978, 146119, 147263, 147732, 148150, 148162, 148302, 148689, 148837, 148858, 148976, 149049, 149516, 149934, 150585, 150928, 151159, 151222, 151240, 151457, 151556, 151759, 152127, 152269",,116,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a oncall: distributed stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"Related #55571 | Filed on the lightning repo with issue #10471. | issue #126347: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged; title: Break the dependency between torch.nn and torch.distributed | issue #125800: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged, better-engineering; title: [BE][DTensor] get rid of @with_comms decorator for tests, and use run_test to init pg | issue #29115: stale/low...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8270869b499662be9f3889fd932ca1d153ecc287110dc8405db87b64049a11de
+BUNDLE-1441,bundle:bundle-1441,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: oncall: distributed (140 issues),issue_group,,oncall: distributed stale/low urgency batch 20,oncall: distributed,"Run one oncall: distributed stale-resolution sweep covering 140 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"4406, 11324, 11793, 13865, 14372, 15716, 17113, 17703, 19267, 21144, 25767, 27955, 29033, 30469, 30505, 30718, 31710, 32018, 32372, 32490, 32924, 33684, 35160, 35671, 36516, 36519, 37079, 37149, 38782, 39022, 39662, 40147, 40566, 41101, 41236, 41428, 42879, 43238, 43510, 44403, 45042, 46753, 47433, 49347, 49481, 49846, 50303, 50323, 51014, 51429, 52040, 53427, 54823, 55448, 55967, 56583, 56772, 56838, 57136, 57158, 57646, 57776, 57787, 58352, 58371, 61289, 61591, 61636, 61659, 61661, 61662, 61781, 61839, 65038, 65428, 65569, 65628, 65650, 65664, 65670, 69663, 70654, 72022, 75129, 75213, 75480, 76069, 76225, 76745, 76747, 78047, 79073, 79467, 79468, 79847, 80241, 80242, 83193, 84468, 87555, 87634, 89686, 91760, 91855, 91856, 91940, 91943, 92128, 93947, 94806, 95309, 95403, 97114, 97484, 97670, 97991, 98286, 98617, 99432, 101177, 101505, 101506, 101586, 102435, 102812, 103306, 114357, 124714, 138329, 148086, 150836, 152261, 152645, 152746, 152964, 153673, 155680, 157321, 157391, 158244",,140,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a oncall: distributed stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #35671: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged; title: allgather_coalesced for tensors of different types seems to be broken | issue #35160: stale/low urgency; labels: todo, oncall: distributed, triaged; title: Documentation doesn't cover MWE using launch.py script | issue #17703: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged; title: Training hangs when using DistributedDataParalle...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ad0c1b01267ba434ec4c430748bb54acc8ac94044f5917aba6c692c1929f6e07
+BUNDLE-1442,bundle:bundle-1442,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: oncall: distributed (52 issues),issue_group,,oncall: distributed stale/low urgency batch 11,oncall: distributed,"Run one oncall: distributed stale-resolution sweep covering 52 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"25416, 28244, 37002, 38642, 38995, 42849, 43536, 47885, 50092, 88621, 102953, 103258, 103372, 103498, 103829, 104389, 104510, 107352, 107575, 107855, 108016, 108047, 108231, 108484, 108976, 109191, 109934, 110363, 111623, 111789, 115309, 116400, 116691, 116980, 118891, 122529, 129442, 129749, 132292, 140563, 140879, 146371, 149990, 155472, 157445, 157606, 157627, 164843, 164925, 165122, 167349, 171179",,52,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a oncall: distributed stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #108976: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged; title: About FSDP | issue #108047: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged; title: DDP training can not accept subnet address in IPV6 | issue #108231: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: distributed, triaged; title: DistributedSampler class: Change total_size into num_samples | issue #107575: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: d...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",dcf734680f0d8eb346845e6bfb351d1626dd8ec8b85ddb6fad5d97c02108790b
+BUNDLE-1443,bundle:bundle-1443,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: oncall: distributed checkpointing (5 issues),issue_group,,oncall: distributed checkpointing stale/low urgency,oncall: distributed checkpointing,"Run one oncall: distributed checkpointing stale-resolution sweep covering 5 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"119070, 126047, 126881, 137327, 146566",,5,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a oncall: distributed checkpointing stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #126881: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, enhancement, oncall: distributed checkpointing; title: [DCP] DCP does not support objects which are lazy initialized. | issue #146566: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, oncall: distributed checkpointing; title: [DCP] Allow for rank-specific tensors with duplicate keys | issue #137327: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, oncall: distributed checkpointing; title:...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",dd87b00b7310e662425b0363e41dad5ace1d05ad080b444b91e10502c5a2686a
+BUNDLE-1444,bundle:bundle-1444,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: oncall: export (33 issues),issue_group,,"Review thread: 2 issues - issue #162700: RuntimeError: The tensor has a non-zero number of elements, but its data is not allocated yet during torch.backward with InternVL",oncall: export,"Run one oncall: export stale-resolution sweep covering 33 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"96386, 103483, 106137, 111902, 112079, 112095, 112443, 113122, 113507, 113552, 113985, 117791, 118922, 123971, 123973, 133262, 134180, 136381, 137274, 139305, 139401, 142025, 142176, 148193, 148568, 148748, 148946, 152337, 153832, 156411, 160937, 162700, 184996",,33,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a oncall: export stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"ve(). This makes the exported artifact state inconsistent and harder to diagnose. Related issue check The closest related report I found is #162700, which also mentions tensors with non-zero elements but unallocated/zero storage. I did not find an existing minimal report for t... | This feels like a duplicate #148748 | issue #123973: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, oncall: pt2, oncall: export; title: Dynamo-ba...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ac74892b942e57217cd4cde3f94dc6dcb06381802219febf77f19bcc4e555f58
+BUNDLE-1445,bundle:bundle-1445,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: oncall: fx (1 issue),issue_group,,#97659 How do I get the original object wrapped by the torch.fx.proxy class？,oncall: fx,"Run one oncall: fx stale-resolution sweep covering 1 issue: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,97659,,1,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a oncall: fx stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #97659: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, oncall: fx; title: How do I get the original object wrapped by the torch.fx.proxy class？",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c006d0028e8933204ec3c493d9c094c1e80a1d65b0e3314793d12a895ea9bab2
+BUNDLE-1446,bundle:bundle-1446,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: oncall: java (2 issues),issue_group,,oncall: java stale/low urgency,oncall: java,"Run one oncall: java stale-resolution sweep covering 2 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"45399, 58973",,2,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a oncall: java stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #58973: stale/low urgency; labels: feature, triaged, oncall: java; title: First-class Java API | issue #45399: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, enhancement, oncall: java; title: Load ExtraFilesMap with Java library",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5a86731ea974347338317c8f271406456e8a915146cfe81bd8c9319444e9d6d9
+BUNDLE-1447,bundle:bundle-1447,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: oncall: jit (69 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 3 issues - issue #24243: hasSideEffects INTERNAL ASSERT FAILED when using .split method with JIT,oncall: jit,"Run one oncall: jit stale-resolution sweep covering 69 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"14219, 18094, 18776, 22155, 22454, 22487, 24243, 27504, 28258, 29108, 29190, 29843, 30138, 30786, 31545, 31565, 31772, 32287, 32641, 32988, 33463, 33672, 33876, 33887, 34126, 34483, 34814, 35116, 35180, 35408, 35788, 35820, 36370, 36575, 36739, 36917, 36931, 37103, 37104, 37987, 37988, 38142, 38472, 38473, 38863, 39356, 39362, 39365, 39463, 39719, 39745, 39806, 40027, 40070, 40071, 40679, 40882, 40886, 42366, 42459, 42882, 42912, 44077, 48153, 48549, 54133, 67955, 68340, 71548",,69,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a oncall: jit stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"Dup of #24243. cc @smessmer | This seems to be related to #24243. If I replace x.requires_grad_(True).split(1, -1) by x_splitted = list(x.requires_grad_(True).split(1, -1)) It throws another error (only o | 🐛 Bug Hello. I was having a MAGMA problem and updated my torch version as was recommended in #67955 to 1.10.0. Now, the code that ran in 1.9. is raising this function error: File ""/home/luis/Desktop/cog/vqgan-c...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2236c065728fbf7be9e7e20e484855340c81bd1429d2f440bf2087d1eca80c81
+BUNDLE-1448,bundle:bundle-1448,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: oncall: jit (140 issues),issue_group,,oncall: jit stale/low urgency batch 5,oncall: jit,"Run one oncall: jit stale-resolution sweep covering 140 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"17655, 17688, 17970, 18005, 18106, 18157, 18212, 18850, 19117, 19349, 19581, 19628, 19978, 20119, 20591, 21275, 21442, 21544, 22911, 22954, 23355, 23850, 23890, 23958, 24102, 24225, 24229, 24248, 24786, 25047, 25329, 25387, 25410, 25648, 25661, 25803, 26730, 26744, 27003, 27094, 27343, 27406, 27505, 27970, 28220, 28239, 28517, 28519, 29063, 29254, 29377, 29419, 29597, 29637, 29642, 29662, 29750, 29822, 30161, 30182, 30226, 30489, 30754, 30788, 31141, 31191, 31202, 31259, 31386, 31391, 31430, 31551, 31574, 31815, 31866, 31882, 31953, 32039, 32253, 32268, 32337, 32357, 32358, 32375, 32390, 32488, 32511, 32690, 32695, 32822, 32840, 33114, 33353, 33396, 33501, 33782, 33844, 34837, 34839, 35074, 35108, 35290, 35520, 35534, 35881, 37384, 38138, 38964, 39357, 39421, 40024, 40507, 40635, 47650, 55083, 55230, 56183, 58720, 60156, 61919, 63475, 65253, 66476, 67687, 72263, 74112, 85229, 90000, 94441, 97595, 97638, 101716, 104195, 107321, 107503, 108224, 108432, 120820, 120822, 134860",,140,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a oncall: jit stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #63475: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: jit, triaged; title: C++ Inference error causes Identity Module | issue #18106: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: jit, triaged, jit-backlog; title: copy.copy not working for ScriptModule | issue #38964: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: jit, triaged; title: [JIT] jit can not recognize the imported function | issue #61919: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: jit, tr...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1ac0e07977685854d18d3ecc884eeaea6e754770c000e2537565c75864d0921b
+BUNDLE-1449,bundle:bundle-1449,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: oncall: jit (20 issues),issue_group,,oncall: jit stale/low urgency batch 15,oncall: jit,"Run one oncall: jit stale-resolution sweep covering 20 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"19504, 20734, 21165, 21454, 24336, 24343, 25591, 27144, 27475, 29987, 30421, 30965, 31129, 32300, 32365, 32463, 32544, 33034, 34361, 35446",,20,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a oncall: jit stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #24343: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: jit, triaged; title: Unified representation for enum types | issue #24336: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: jit, triaged; title: Auto tuner takes too much time in serialized model | issue #21454: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: jit, triaged; title: [JIT] Memory Leak during tracing? | issue #21165: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: jit, triaged; title: Getting...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",428468aba870418ec0a51f7c225b3e27c233bebd3e53c625ce39bcc2ec187130
+BUNDLE-1450,bundle:bundle-1450,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: oncall: mobile (9 issues),issue_group,,oncall: mobile stale/low urgency,oncall: mobile,"Run one oncall: mobile stale-resolution sweep covering 9 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"37343, 38319, 47609, 53365, 73160, 92086, 104606, 112716, 116515",,9,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a oncall: mobile stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #116515: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, oncall: mobile; title: mobile model has very different inference result | issue #112716: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: quantization, triaged, oncall: mobile; title: Quantized model's size gets doubled on optimizing and saving it for mobile | issue #37343: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: quantization, triaged, oncall: mobile; title: qnnpack's quantized-add...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3faca4ceee56acdc0b6f109056e94d9db95155b832695681fe8a0340dc3fec9a
+BUNDLE-1451,bundle:bundle-1451,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: oncall: package/deploy (3 issues),issue_group,,oncall: package/deploy stale/low urgency,oncall: package/deploy,"Run one oncall: package/deploy stale-resolution sweep covering 3 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"60977, 65261, 71317",,3,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a oncall: package/deploy stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #71317: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, days, oncall: package/deploy, imported; title: [torch.deploy] Using zipped torch modules in torch.deploy interpreter | issue #65261: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, oncall: package/deploy, imported; title: Add an `all_paths` method to PackageExporter | issue #60977: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, oncall: package/deploy, imported; title: [package] pattern u...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e5d7ffcdecf543059e2bc2cfeeeae7acba76e200d3ecae82c8b8d03c25464c58
+BUNDLE-1452,bundle:bundle-1452,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: oncall: profiler (5 issues),issue_group,,oncall: profiler stale/low urgency,oncall: profiler,"Run one oncall: profiler stale-resolution sweep covering 5 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"58447, 60146, 78871, 155001, 158364",,5,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a oncall: profiler stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #158364: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, oncall: profiler; title: [feature request] [memory_viz] Flexible time/range memory event filtering controls to skip loading all memory events from pickle in the browser's memory | issue #155001: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, oncall: profiler; title: The profiler does not seem to be able to record cuda runtime nodes | issue #78871: stale/low urgency; labels:...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",cadce453710a7676de6e11d013c635e6fb95686a8c92d50d5fab47526b9e7527
+BUNDLE-1453,bundle:bundle-1453,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: oncall: pt2 (33 issues),issue_group,,oncall: pt2 stale/low urgency batch 2,oncall: pt2,"Run one oncall: pt2 stale-resolution sweep covering 33 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"100241, 100637, 102853, 104531, 105092, 105859, 106269, 106388, 111519, 124427, 126190, 126644, 138299, 141560, 141727, 147239, 149094, 149096, 149318, 149452, 149453, 149454, 149455, 150961, 150963, 153242, 154214, 154463, 155065, 155332, 157918, 162259, 167895",,33,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a oncall: pt2 stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #153242: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, oncall: pt2; title: [RFC] Add a SlimTensor representation to help AOTInductor generate standalone binaries | issue #150963: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, oncall: pt2, empathy-day; title: [ued] `torch.compile` yields lower latency when compiling transformer blocks only for ComfyUI GGUF Flux | issue #150961: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, oncall: pt2, emp...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",15bb4672573969f38108c1dd4cb029bfc638ed0d28cf4e9164a6071732372bd8
+BUNDLE-1454,bundle:bundle-1454,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: oncall: quantization (91 issues),issue_group,,oncall: quantization stale/low urgency batch 6,oncall: quantization,"Run one oncall: quantization stale-resolution sweep covering 91 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"25314, 29657, 31316, 32262, 36508, 38569, 39058, 39495, 40759, 41149, 42336, 42594, 44676, 45635, 46604, 47311, 47363, 47535, 47857, 48106, 51152, 54816, 55464, 55912, 55945, 56978, 58969, 60008, 60210, 61046, 67651, 68892, 69158, 70480, 71028, 71721, 71889, 73507, 73738, 73941, 74540, 74627, 74953, 75440, 75785, 76304, 76755, 78722, 79709, 79739, 81287, 81381, 81667, 82053, 83521, 83672, 83929, 83941, 84052, 84064, 84148, 84178, 85745, 85851, 86848, 87126, 88505, 88579, 88800, 89303, 90288, 90289, 90394, 90553, 91263, 91604, 94371, 95785, 100051, 106780, 108399, 110515, 112833, 114928, 117508, 118634, 118829, 127391, 144403, 157591, 170402",,91,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a oncall: quantization stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #84052: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: quantization, triaged; title: Index out of bounds Error with PerChannel Quantization | issue #40759: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: quantization, low priority, triaged; title: Quantization support for F.Softmax | issue #81667: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: quantization, low priority, triaged; title: [Tracker] AO migration of quantization from `torch.nn` to...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",75f047842ce4789b737710fa69e940ec4261dfa35cb23ff420526e7eeffa0e1a
+BUNDLE-1455,bundle:bundle-1455,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: oncall: r2p (5 issues),issue_group,,oncall: r2p stale/low urgency,oncall: r2p,"Run one oncall: r2p stale-resolution sweep covering 5 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"68553, 69197, 69520, 77737, 78061",,5,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a oncall: r2p stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #77737: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, oncall: r2p; title: torchrun leads to `ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'tensorboard'`, but python -m torch.distributed.launch is ok | issue #69197: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, oncall: r2p; title: RendezvousConnectionError when use C10d on multi nodes | issue #69520: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, Stale, oncall: r2p; title: race condition of agent'...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e5a3fd418663684f4e3631dadca855aabdbf2174d81320b840255b8dbfa978ad
+BUNDLE-1456,bundle:bundle-1456,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: oncall: releng (18 issues),issue_group,,oncall: releng stale/low urgency batch 1,oncall: releng,"Run one oncall: releng stale-resolution sweep covering 18 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"58533, 61261, 69009, 73985, 81654, 83257, 92310, 98006, 101798, 107611, 109958, 124974, 136691, 137370, 143206, 148984, 149660, 156085",,18,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a oncall: releng stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #156085: stale/low urgency; labels: feature, oncall: releng, triaged, security; title: Idea: Add SBOM Generation (and optional vuln scan) for better supply chain insight | issue #149660: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: releng, triaged, better-engineering; title: cd: Migrate binary builds off of Jinja | issue #148984: stale/low urgency; labels: oncall: releng, triaged; title: [Sync file] the new file is no...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",87c1770e5dec2d1da7fb3db124b720c22e4478548bdf78ea5ba7ee38c349edc5
+BUNDLE-1457,bundle:bundle-1457,stale_issue_resolution_sweep,Stale issue resolution sweep,evidence bundle,Stale issue resolution sweep: oncall: visualization (2 issues),issue_group,,oncall: visualization stale/low urgency,oncall: visualization,"Run one oncall: visualization stale-resolution sweep covering 2 issues: reproduce, close with rationale, or promote live failures into a PR.",Collapses old low-urgency issues into one accountable maintainer pass.,"No code patch is simulated; proof is the issue/PR evidence pack, duplicate links, stale age, labels, and maintainer-visible closure/reopen criteria.",covered_by_local_packet,"34953, 36028",,2,0,stale_batch_policy,"This is a oncall: visualization stale issue batch, not a single code diagnosis.","Apply one sweep policy: close with rationale when no live reproducer exists, mark canonical duplicates, or promote still-reproducible failures into a local patch-plan bundle.",medium,"issue #34953: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, oncall: visualization; title: Graphic tool to view the backward(Gradient Graph) and forward graph in Pytorch | issue #36028: stale/low urgency; labels: triaged, oncall: visualization; title: About tensorboard in pytorch record graph in different state",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7ef51b44d30c7843fdd37208cc2593fa71b01f6e824324bf95db831a9872388b
+BUNDLE-1458,bundle:bundle-1458,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: activation checkpointing (1 issue),issue_group,,"#155924 Activation Checkpointing breaks ""torch.distributed.checkpoint.state_dict._get_fqns""",module: activation checkpointing,Create one module: activation checkpointing triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: activation checkpointing paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,155924,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: activation checkpointing bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #155924: needs triage; labels: oncall: distributed, module: activation checkpointing, oncall: distributed checkpointing, bot-triaged, ptd-bot-triaged; title: Activation Checkpointing breaks ""torch.distributed.checkpoint.state_dict._get_fqns""",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",917d207cce2c3de2a3248a7e81ee1ba57ed39d847101fbc737b0c4416f7903b1
+BUNDLE-1459,bundle:bundle-1459,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: amp (automated mixed precision) (4 issues),issue_group,,module: amp (automated mixed precision) needs triage,module: amp (automated mixed precision),Create one module: amp (automated mixed precision) triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: amp (automated mixed precision) paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"50231, 59257, 69616, 104959",,4,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: amp (automated mixed precision) bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #104959: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, has workaround, module: amp (automated mixed precision); title: Saving a LightningModule torch.jit.ScriptModule is incompatible with torch.amp.autocast | issue #69616: needs triage; labels: oncall: distributed, module: cuda, module: amp (automated mixed precision), Stale; title: Multi-GPU training stuck when using grad scaler | issue #59257: needs triage; labels: o...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d07a3cf7848ae7749910bc90d0008f21dbead6541cef8ab8f1df94c0b6a3244f
+BUNDLE-1460,bundle:bundle-1460,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: android (24 issues),issue_group,,module: android needs triage batch 1,module: android,Create one module: android triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: android paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"18380, 40906, 42355, 42427, 50531, 52970, 56703, 57271, 59690, 59865, 60172, 61693, 61709, 61951, 62165, 62676, 62821, 64333, 64488, 65058, 65734, 66545, 68330, 68871",,24,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: android bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #59690: needs triage; labels: module: memory usage, module: android, oncall: mobile; title: Inference ran on new thread leak memory on Android | issue #61709: needs triage; labels: module: android, oncall: mobile, module: vulkan; title: [pytorch android] use Vulkan backend crash | issue #68330: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, module: android, oncall: mobile; title: isObject()INTERNAL ASSERT FAILED at ""../...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4c55744c0d937cb3d89650f0673a9aece7ef503c69e88d568b5d7deb5379a5dc
+BUNDLE-1461,bundle:bundle-1461,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: aotdispatch (1 issue),issue_group,,#189293 AttributeError: Can't get local object 'WeakValueDictionary.__init__.<locals>.remove' during AOTAutograd graph caching on Python 3.13,module: aotdispatch,Create one module: aotdispatch triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: aotdispatch paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,189293,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: aotdispatch bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #189293: needs triage; labels: triage review, module: pickle, tensor subclass, oncall: pt2, module: aotdispatch, module: pt2-dispatcher, module: python version, bot-triaged; title: AttributeError: Can't get local object 'WeakValueDictionary.__init__.<locals>.remove' during AOTAutograd graph caching on Python 3.13",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3dc1bf1ea2cebd99c2a10f0f572578bee7d2f79d0cde485919e022806f6530ae
+BUNDLE-1462,bundle:bundle-1462,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: aotinductor (12 issues),issue_group,,module: aotinductor needs triage,module: aotinductor,Create one module: aotinductor triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: aotinductor paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"140805, 145394, 145610, 148557, 151746, 152612, 154094, 159269, 162365, 162451, 165929, 166939",,12,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: aotinductor bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #145610: needs triage; labels: module: crash, module: arm, oncall: pt2, export-triaged, oncall: export, module: aotinductor; title: mmap fails on 64k page aarch64 systems for AOTI model loading | issue #166939: needs triage; labels: oncall: pt2, export-triaged, oncall: export, module: aotinductor; title: Reduce aten::empty Calls for Models with Constant Input Shapes in AOTInductor | issue #165929: needs tria...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2cf85315fda6aef86b9987aaa81003dc85574c6fe868af608f9aefe46f843023
+BUNDLE-1463,bundle:bundle-1463,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: arm (12 issues),issue_group,,module: arm needs triage,module: arm,Create one module: arm triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: arm paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"48452, 88617, 125734, 144770, 146483, 146914, 146915, 148902, 157668, 173907, 177254, 177258",,12,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: arm bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #157668: needs triage; labels: high priority, triage review, needs reproduction, oncall: distributed, module: cuda, triaged, module: nccl, module: arm, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed infra, ptd-bot-triaged; title: NCCL error caused due to use of NVLS in torch 2.7.1-cu128 on aarch64 gb200 cluster | issue #173907: needs triage; labels: needs reproduction, oncall: quantization, module: nnpack, module: arm, bo...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6fc143812b98d2763469abe4efee4580a8415b56193a868f8429788934cbc65f
+BUNDLE-1464,bundle:bundle-1464,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: assert failure (1 issue),issue_group,,#21255 IsType<T>() ASSERT FAILED [Detectron e2e_mask_rcnn_R-50-C4_1x.yaml],module: assert failure,Create one module: assert failure triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: assert failure paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,21255,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: assert failure bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #21255: needs triage; labels: caffe2, module: assert failure; title: IsType<T>() ASSERT FAILED [Detectron e2e_mask_rcnn_R-50-C4_1x.yaml]",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7b2d02002e2cad066f888b55447c9fec0f8ada21e0c03b926078242b709b30f4
+BUNDLE-1465,bundle:bundle-1465,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: autograd (7 issues),issue_group,,module: autograd needs triage,module: autograd,Create one module: autograd triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: autograd paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"49157, 57457, 69741, 69744, 73972, 74590, 166577",,7,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: autograd bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #166577: needs triage; labels: triage review, oncall: distributed, module: autograd, triaged, actionable, module: pipelining, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed parallelisms, ptd-bot-triaged; title: Pipelining - cannot calculate dWeight if a custom torch.autograd.Function is used with a schedule that performs separate dWeight and dInput backward passes | issue #74590: needs triage; labels: triage review, oncal...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",efffd63051a2ae359089bca974b3a07351fbc38bd8694cd601e33b8c8d7bf774
+BUNDLE-1466,bundle:bundle-1466,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: binaries (11 issues),issue_group,,module: binaries needs triage,module: binaries,Create one module: binaries triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: binaries paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"68385, 75336, 83271, 96060, 110259, 121597, 139745, 159265, 174488, 175045, 189194",,11,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: binaries bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #189194: needs triage; labels: high priority, triage review, module: binaries, module: rocm, triaged, module: vectorization, module: regression, oncall: pt2, module: inductor, bot-triaged; title: [ROCm] torch 2.13 wheel: ""Can't detect vectorized ISA for CPU"" in torch.compile smoke test on non-ROCm image (regression vs 2.12.1) | issue #175045: needs triage; labels: module: binaries, oncall: releng, module: ci...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",48cddb3f9a6f56ef7dea4e12bdce1e92d8c96105cd3522d3fb0e1553bc611d04
+BUNDLE-1467,bundle:bundle-1467,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: bootcamp (24 issues),issue_group,,module: bootcamp needs triage batch 1,module: bootcamp,Create one module: bootcamp triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: bootcamp paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"5489, 37387, 38034, 41419, 43409, 45549, 47565, 48045, 51673, 55577, 60062, 61344, 61966, 63171, 63247, 63403, 63917, 64060, 66094, 68014, 71261, 71277, 84318, 126276",,24,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: bootcamp bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #63917: needs triage; labels: high priority, triage review, oncall: distributed, module: bootcamp, pt_distributed_rampup, module: ddp; title: Add tests for DDP broadcast_buffers=True | issue #45549: needs triage; labels: high priority, triage review, oncall: distributed, module: bootcamp, triaged, module: nccl, pt_distributed_rampup; title: Can't initialize NCCL/GLOO process group if default process group is...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6e67b8f83006c18b9f600a2c859ebcfba79da51c77e7fd070e3ab7998770a20f
+BUNDLE-1468,bundle:bundle-1468,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: build (10 issues),issue_group,,module: build needs triage,module: build,Create one module: build triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: build paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"7036, 16602, 48932, 71359, 79003, 86791, 95124, 96185, 156915, 172348",,10,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: build bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #7036: needs triage; labels: module: crash, module: build, caffe2; title: [Caffe2] compilation linker error `libtbb.so.2: undefined reference to std::__exception_ptr` | issue #172348: needs triage; labels: oncall: distributed, module: build, module: nccl, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed infra, ptd-bot-triaged; title: Build failure in NCCLSymmetricMemory.cu: undefined identifier `offset_` | issue #156915: ne...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d2bd77943e8d0651c143676f9b92fc23578dc47c4645a1f205bb70278a52023b
+BUNDLE-1469,bundle:bundle-1469,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: c10d (36 issues),issue_group,,module: c10d needs triage batch 1,module: c10d,Create one module: c10d triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: c10d paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"52607, 59552, 59612, 62007, 62283, 62300, 62314, 62780, 63486, 63740, 63812, 63929, 64688, 68088, 68866, 69594, 70054, 70155, 71049, 71303, 73542, 73960, 80349, 81684, 83289, 83824, 85234, 106164, 106633, 130251, 130407, 137007, 143593, 170707, 177959, 179848",,36,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: c10d bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #106164: needs triage; labels: oncall: distributed, module: crash, module: c10d, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed infra, ptd-bot-triaged; title: distributed.batch_isend_irecv() crash when send/recv refers to itself | issue #71303: needs triage; labels: high priority, triage review, oncall: distributed, feature, triaged, module: c10d, module: ddp, module: distributed_tool, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed par...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f7838ef70d7ed858d442b0cbe217612dffc6c3917325a8094840fd8ba503fb4c
+BUNDLE-1470,bundle:bundle-1470,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: ci (8 issues),issue_group,,module: ci needs triage,module: ci,Create one module: ci triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: ci paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"52788, 52800, 55905, 56090, 153517, 161179, 162878, 169069",,8,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: ci bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #153517: needs triage; labels: oncall: distributed, module: ci, module: nccl, module: regression, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed infra, ptd-bot-triaged; title: [CI][CUDA][Distributed] test_non_blocking_with_eager_init timeout | issue #162878: needs triage; labels: module: cuda, oncall: releng, module: ci; title: CUDA 13.0 Segmentation Fault in test/test_numba_integration.py::TestNumbaIntegration::test_arra...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c7254cfc482bff87ecb8939f7fa0146b5cfcac1ceaa406464b96b04139ec08dd
+BUNDLE-1471,bundle:bundle-1471,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: complex (2 issues),issue_group,,module: complex needs triage,module: complex,Create one module: complex triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: complex paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"154324, 156814",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: complex bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #156814: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, module: complex; title: torchscript: RuntimeError Unsupported dtype complex | issue #154324: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, module: complex; title: torch.jit.script gives false results for autograd if complex data types are involved",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f19deb037194c835cca1636a8961636fe4a17a3d2a27ccfad1bca50ce31798e3
+BUNDLE-1472,bundle:bundle-1472,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: convolution (4 issues),issue_group,,module: convolution needs triage,module: convolution,Create one module: convolution triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: convolution paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"61268, 154354, 188323, 189239",,4,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: convolution bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #188323: needs triage; labels: triage review, module: crash, module: cpu, module: convolution, triaged, oncall: pt2, module: dynamic shapes, module: inductor, oncall: cpu inductor, bot-triaged; title: [Inductor][CPU] dynamic=True convolution lowering crashes with ValueError: Exponent must be non-negative | issue #189239: needs triage; labels: triage review, module: performance, module: convolution, module: r...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",87e0804a14c3bf23c13403304d699166823c1e23607391d0315f33fc7edb9dfe
+BUNDLE-1473,bundle:bundle-1473,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: correctness (silent) (3 issues),issue_group,,module: correctness (silent) needs triage,module: correctness (silent),Create one module: correctness (silent) triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: correctness (silent) paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"86597, 86616, 153315",,3,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: correctness (silent) bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #153315: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, module: correctness (silent); title: [JIT] Compilation-induced discrepancy in F.instance_norm when passing input as running stats | issue #86616: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, module: correctness (silent); title: JIT returns different values for a model on cuda and returns a strange error message on cpu | issue #86597: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, module...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6ff6214865840fdebdc8d42a5168de62ba40f9ac68a4602f74f9f0a88f9eae16
+BUNDLE-1474,bundle:bundle-1474,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: cpp (6 issues),issue_group,,module: cpp needs triage,module: cpp,Create one module: cpp triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: cpp paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"18476, 68049, 73352, 84055, 88301, 89484",,6,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: cpp bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #73352: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, module: crash, module: cpp; title: Segfault on unloading a model | issue #18476: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, module: cpp; title: [CPP] Allow binding config structs into the Python front end | issue #89484: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, module: cpp; title: kind_.is_prim() INTERNAL ASSERT FAILED at ""../torch/csrc/jit/ir/ir.cpp"":1098 | issue #88301: needs t...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",23d70cfe2383f4dbb1d918831e8dbdf0ac67d8a71faf2180df71433c90a300d8
+BUNDLE-1475,bundle:bundle-1475,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: cpp-extensions (2 issues),issue_group,,module: cpp-extensions needs triage,module: cpp-extensions,Create one module: cpp-extensions triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: cpp-extensions paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"46505, 189245",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: cpp-extensions bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #189245: needs triage; labels: triage review, module: cpp-extensions, module: deadlock, bot-triaged; title: [cpp_extension] Stale .lock file from FileBaton causes permanent deadlock when compilation process is killed | issue #46505: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, module: cpp-extensions, internals, module: torchbind; title: Cannot script when a static method or cross module function calls custom op",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",be130c4278418556803bc9c004e29722dc71b7391a1ff65593b396ec1dfa29fc
+BUNDLE-1476,bundle:bundle-1476,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: cpu (5 issues),issue_group,,module: cpu needs triage,module: cpu,Create one module: cpu triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: cpu paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"116240, 122813, 153145, 181621, 187912",,5,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: cpu bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #187912: needs triage; labels: high priority, triage review, needs reproduction, module: crash, module: cpu, triaged, module: mkldnn, module: multithreading, module: linear algebra, module: intel, bot-triaged; title: [CPU] Concurrent `cpublas::brgemm` calls can crash in the AMX path when the underlying oneDNN ukernel is shared | issue #153145: needs triage; labels: module: crash, module: cpu, module: intel,...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a6a45680409cf937a52c537c6ef6038442c69f54c7117f078ffc4967230a198a
+BUNDLE-1477,bundle:bundle-1477,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: crash (11 issues),issue_group,,module: crash needs triage,module: crash,Create one module: crash triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: crash paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"73885, 116254, 122019, 128693, 128694, 153260, 162476, 170003, 186535, 189126, 189150",,11,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: crash bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #186535: needs triage; labels: triage review, oncall: distributed, module: multi-gpu, module: crash, module: windows, module: cuda, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed infra; title: Windows, gloo: Access violation (0xC0000005) in ProcessGroupGloo::enqueue when calling allreduce on CUDA tensors — GlooAllreduceRegistry has no kCUDA creator | issue #189150: needs triage; labels: triage review, module: crash, modul...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",47debe36b119875b2278672f5a574b4e7d496e381821160a7cf6db5ceebcbdf1
+BUNDLE-1478,bundle:bundle-1478,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: cuda (16 issues),issue_group,,module: cuda needs triage,module: cuda,Create one module: cuda triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: cuda paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"19053, 42350, 45745, 49961, 50112, 53451, 65985, 72859, 93134, 132009, 165230, 165231, 167304, 169970, 181865, 187094",,16,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: cuda bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #72859: needs triage; labels: high priority, triage review, module: cuda, oncall: profiler; title: Profiler crashes with ProfilerActivity.CUDA on AWS p4d.24xlarge with A100-SXM4-40GB | issue #167304: needs triage; labels: oncall: distributed, module: cuda, module: rpc, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed infra, ptd-bot-triaged; title: RPC cannot run in jetson orin because of the specific uuid of orin | issue #1...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",23eb6be01c030ce872e74a5f9acc4f6e68217acbcbf019accc04be71712e0a8a
+BUNDLE-1479,bundle:bundle-1479,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: cuda graphs (1 issue),issue_group,,#109719 Make torch.cuda.graphs.is_current_stream_capturing() available in TorchScript,module: cuda graphs,Create one module: cuda graphs triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: cuda graphs paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,109719,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: cuda graphs bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #109719: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, module: cuda graphs; title: Make torch.cuda.graphs.is_current_stream_capturing() available in TorchScript",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4f267d85831edf47f5aa5f06c7685daf25fd5e9a38abe8dab93277f48d1c0603
+BUNDLE-1480,bundle:bundle-1480,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: cudnn (1 issue),issue_group,,#6898 [Caffe2] cudnn versions compatibility issue.,module: cudnn,Create one module: cudnn triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: cudnn paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,6898,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: cudnn bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #6898: needs triage; labels: module: cudnn, caffe2; title: [Caffe2] cudnn versions compatibility issue.",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",bbd8824bed4790c56d19cbe3326513c9d718613a3cac585ab809b2b140a87f51
+BUNDLE-1481,bundle:bundle-1481,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: custom-operators (2 issues),issue_group,,module: custom-operators needs triage,module: custom-operators,Create one module: custom-operators triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: custom-operators paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"33110, 51994",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: custom-operators bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #51994: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, feature, module: custom-operators, weeks; title: Allow Custom Classes to register a handler for .to operations | issue #33110: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, module: custom-operators, actionable; title: InlineAutodiffSubgraphs in JIT inlines non-differentiable custom groups unexpectedly.",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6504a602891e1dfa9cf47bb37149f2bc90e1200af830f1f887d94f98ff4c4b03
+BUNDLE-1482,bundle:bundle-1482,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: data (1 issue),issue_group,,#92294 jit.fork stalls multiprocessing dataloader,module: data,Create one module: data triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: data paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,92294,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: data bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #92294: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, module: dataloader, module: data; title: jit.fork stalls multiprocessing dataloader",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",fa3f0ffdf76f7ba784c9fbe00768ec935092bcf5f73229f7efca9c83c5eff96b
+BUNDLE-1483,bundle:bundle-1483,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: data parallel (2 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #15421: JIT is not compatible with data parallel,module: data parallel,Create one module: data parallel triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: data parallel paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"15421, 30635",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: data parallel bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"t-in-evaluation-mode-using-multi-gpu-learned-model/33280/4 -- is tracing inside of the module still the recommended route here? Referencing #15421 #16891 #17540 ... the last one in particular might be the most relevant to the eventual solution, but I'm not sure.",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",506937e98d72407e9077648411c0b82734abc3d4443aad1901bb95f583ff3e61
+BUNDLE-1484,bundle:bundle-1484,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: dataloader (3 issues),issue_group,,module: dataloader needs triage,module: dataloader,Create one module: dataloader triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: dataloader paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"62885, 64986, 69352",,3,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: dataloader bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #69352: needs triage; labels: oncall: distributed, module: dataloader; title: I want to know how to read the LMDB file once when using DDP | issue #64986: needs triage; labels: oncall: distributed, module: dataloader; title: RandomSampler / DistributedSampler does not seem really random | issue #62885: needs triage; labels: oncall: distributed, module: dataloader; title: Type of first constructor parameter o...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",07e2f96eb26213ce2ce2ea43a0690a5f097df4348130cc37adc6a93a4c05a328
+BUNDLE-1485,bundle:bundle-1485,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: ddp (28 issues),issue_group,,module: ddp needs triage batch 1,module: ddp,Create one module: ddp triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: ddp paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"47163, 47260, 48478, 58111, 60844, 62403, 62542, 62998, 63445, 65813, 66504, 68297, 68407, 68862, 68917, 69308, 69591, 70865, 71855, 73332, 74115, 76449, 80832, 85671, 106690, 111138, 112152, 124666",,28,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: ddp bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #76449: needs triage; labels: high priority, triage review, oncall: distributed, triaged, enhancement, better-engineering, pt_distributed_rampup, module: ddp, module: fsdp, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed parallelisms, ptd-bot-triaged; title: Enhance _verify_param_shape_across_processes | issue #71855: needs triage; labels: high priority, triage review, oncall: distributed, triaged, module: regression, modu...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e3ed780681e929016d2a434cf11b39bb2f246afac26c0611b30614386e53cb14
+BUNDLE-1486,bundle:bundle-1486,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: ddp (2 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #67570: RFC: Overlap optimizer computation with DDP/FSDP backward,module: ddp,Create one module: ddp triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: ddp paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"67570, 71595",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: ddp bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"🚀 The feature, motivation and pitch A process to overlap optimizer + allreduce in DDP is being implemented as described in #67570, although as a prototype feature there is limited support for some use cases. This issue exists to maintain a list of currently missing fea",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d457c615f083bb51d5de7af2d753938156684af4b788f8059cd07e32e69411bc
+BUNDLE-1487,bundle:bundle-1487,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: deadlock (2 issues),issue_group,,module: deadlock needs triage,module: deadlock,Create one module: deadlock triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: deadlock paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"67241, 145743",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: deadlock bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #145743: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, module: deadlock; title: TorchScript run_method fails from 2.5.0 onward on Ubuntu | issue #67241: needs triage; labels: oncall: distributed, module: nccl, module: deadlock; title: init_process_group hangs for multi-node, Pytorch > v1.3.1 and file init_method",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5f15ee777347c6ed6d4a1325ff36e0beac491d75eb012b22d51bec30c1bca491
+BUNDLE-1488,bundle:bundle-1488,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: decompositions (1 issue),issue_group,,#125266 [export] linalg ops after core aten decomposition,module: decompositions,Create one module: decompositions triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: decompositions paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,125266,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: decompositions bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #125266: needs triage; labels: module: decompositions, oncall: export; title: [export] linalg ops after core aten decomposition",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7422eb06013d6da937d21149cd4a65bbb29d271631bcc245d201223b8adfb02d
+BUNDLE-1489,bundle:bundle-1489,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: deploy (2 issues),issue_group,,module: deploy needs triage,module: deploy,Create one module: deploy triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: deploy paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"72482, 76686",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: deploy bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #72482: needs triage; labels: module: deploy, oncall: package/deploy, imported; title: Improve torch::deploy documentation | issue #76686: needs triage; labels: module: deploy, oncall: package/deploy, imported; title: [torch::deploy] Remove `manager_` from the constructor and deconstructor of `InterpreterSession`",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",48214e77c645d80c38c41b5749c37119c9833cb02455cb9ba57263dee3f0206b
+BUNDLE-1490,bundle:bundle-1490,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: deprecation (1 issue),issue_group,,"#184982 deprecation of derived quantized dtypes (quint8, qint8, qint32)",module: deprecation,Create one module: deprecation triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: deprecation paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,184982,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: deprecation bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #184982: needs triage; labels: oncall: quantization, module: deprecation, topic: deprecation; title: deprecation of derived quantized dtypes (quint8, qint8, qint32)",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3fa8edff4d09569fb6182323c3009c46121778ed3c7aedad978ef49470e70034
+BUNDLE-1491,bundle:bundle-1491,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: devicemesh (2 issues),issue_group,,module: devicemesh needs triage,module: devicemesh,Create one module: devicemesh triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: devicemesh paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"172218, 173815",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: devicemesh bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #173815: needs triage; labels: oncall: distributed, feature, module: DeviceMesh, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed infra, ptd-bot-triaged; title: [RFC] Abort a DeviceMesh | issue #172218: needs triage; labels: oncall: distributed, enhancement, module: DeviceMesh, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed infra, ptd-bot-triaged; title: `_expand_group` can get DeviceMesh ranks more directly",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",96500c491f8eb9ecbe6b6ed3343c84e65d74fb2f3496476158fe60acf2422e92
+BUNDLE-1492,bundle:bundle-1492,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: dispatch (1 issue),issue_group,,#54728 JIT prim ops v.s. dispatcher,module: dispatch,Create one module: dispatch triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: dispatch paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,54728,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: dispatch bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #54728: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, module: dispatch, oncall: mobile; title: JIT prim ops v.s. dispatcher",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e6dbfe47096fe0e6a66dab09b5fc56dc8db9c16d7555b0d36d20f3f47a4b7e8f
+BUNDLE-1493,bundle:bundle-1493,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: docs (16 issues),issue_group,,module: docs needs triage,module: docs,Create one module: docs triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: docs paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"6465, 37442, 46574, 52517, 54599, 60953, 67111, 67392, 74221, 76659, 77869, 87268, 92855, 95560, 130958, 139063",,16,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: docs bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #130958: needs triage; labels: triage review, oncall: distributed, module: docs, triaged, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed infra, ptd-bot-triaged; title: Document ProcessGroupOptions | issue #92855: needs triage; labels: module: docs, oncall: profiler; title: Profiler documentation doesn't mention some exports are mutually exclusive | issue #139063: needs triage; labels: module: docs, oncall: quantization; t...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",295863a003d033f2fda6cd8195e6efea67085d020c1c0b7bf26f01c872827ced
+BUNDLE-1494,bundle:bundle-1494,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: dtensor (13 issues),issue_group,,module: dtensor needs triage,module: dtensor,Create one module: dtensor triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: dtensor paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"149447, 161147, 162731, 173988, 173990, 174276, 174732, 175469, 177059, 179502, 180088, 182031, 185167",,13,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: dtensor bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #162731: needs triage; labels: high priority, triage review, oncall: distributed, triaged, module: dtensor, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed parallelisms, ptd-bot-triaged; title: DTensor cached op propagation results can be mutated when propagating other ops | issue #180088: needs triage; labels: high priority, triage review, oncall: distributed, triaged, module: dtensor, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed par...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c4e66238c7a5216014f74375cfa95b5eb41bf3fc651347963742ad50d68b1a89
+BUNDLE-1495,bundle:bundle-1495,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: dynamic shapes (3 issues),issue_group,,module: dynamic shapes needs triage,module: dynamic shapes,Create one module: dynamic shapes triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: dynamic shapes paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"126127, 132930, 153179",,3,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: dynamic shapes bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #153179: needs triage; labels: module: error checking, oncall: pt2, module: dynamic shapes, oncall: export; title: export: No error raised on data-dependent assertion. | issue #132930: needs triage; labels: module: dynamic shapes, export-triaged, oncall: export; title: Treating SymNode compute more fungibly for the purpose of export flattener (or not?) | issue #126127: needs triage; labels: module: dynamic s...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",92c1fa891de17a4229d0d46c458402702d67139af21d2649fcd415f9f02e15cd
+BUNDLE-1496,bundle:bundle-1496,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: dynamo (10 issues),issue_group,,module: dynamo needs triage,module: dynamo,Create one module: dynamo triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: dynamo paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"112844, 123499, 125245, 145088, 151016, 156558, 172568, 174481, 186107, 186465",,10,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: dynamo bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #145088: needs triage; labels: oncall: pt2, module: dynamo, oncall: export, pt2-pass-rate-regression; title: [torchbench] torch._dynamo.exc.Unsupported: Graph break due to unsupported builtin None.morphologyEx | issue #156558: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, oncall: pt2, module: dynamo, oncall: export; title: Using collections. namedtuple in the forward method of the model resulted in compilation failure...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d58bfecdc3bd218bdbc44858ae236e23517249dfb78baf89ca57753266c4b446
+BUNDLE-1497,bundle:bundle-1497,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: edge cases (1 issue),issue_group,,#156955 `torch.jit.load()` crashes with C++ `c10::Error` if file system is full (no graceful handling),module: edge cases,Create one module: edge cases triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: edge cases paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,156955,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: edge cases bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #156955: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, module: error checking, actionable, module: edge cases; title: `torch.jit.load()` crashes with C++ `c10::Error` if file system is full (no graceful handling)",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b309ef639d163de480f5b15aacc81a70c062b4fae9c9a94d759b153ae1cb57e8
+BUNDLE-1498,bundle:bundle-1498,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: elastic (4 issues),issue_group,,module: elastic needs triage,module: elastic,Create one module: elastic triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: elastic paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"63832, 100310, 103221, 181429",,4,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: elastic bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #103221: needs triage; labels: oncall: distributed, module: elastic, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed infra, ptd-bot-triaged; title: [help] did torch.distributed.launch can be applied on k8s cluster with pytorch-operator | issue #100310: needs triage; labels: oncall: distributed, module: elastic, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed infra, ptd-bot-triaged; title: Using ddp training with different machine | issue...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e13341e8b74d5884e250187a2adc213579c6d6ef600dd291861ab9e0040f54d1
+BUNDLE-1499,bundle:bundle-1499,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: error checking (1 issue),issue_group,,#149737 `INTERNAL ASSERT FAILED` in `interpolate` and `torch.import_ir_module`,module: error checking,Create one module: error checking triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: error checking paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,149737,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: error checking bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #149737: needs triage; labels: oncall: quantization, module: error checking; title: `INTERNAL ASSERT FAILED` in `interpolate` and `torch.import_ir_module`",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4d3144a7050f245b0de464a07068cb80372c465ecbf08247f2b93f56f2a33797
+BUNDLE-1500,bundle:bundle-1500,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: flaky-tests (2 issues),issue_group,,module: flaky-tests needs triage,module: flaky-tests,Create one module: flaky-tests triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: flaky-tests paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"158331, 164534",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: flaky-tests bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #164534: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, module: flaky-tests, skipped, module: unknown; title: DISABLED RecordDebugHandles.ScopedCallbacks (__main__.test_jit) | issue #158331: needs triage; labels: module: flaky-tests, skipped, oncall: cpu inductor; title: DISABLED test_conv2d_unary_cpu_cpp_wrapper (__main__.TestCppWrapper)",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0214208f7b79742e6860b666eebd05a2a3ab6f0860611b70ad495dd7d2b0002c
+BUNDLE-1501,bundle:bundle-1501,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: flex attention (1 issue),issue_group,,#189144 [XPU][B580] `flex-attn-causal` performance drop with `last_level_cache_size` cache clear between runs,module: flex attention,Create one module: flex attention triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: flex attention paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,189144,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: flex attention bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #189144: needs triage; labels: triage review, module: performance, module: regression, has workaround, oncall: pt2, module: inductor, module: xpu, module: flex attention, bot-triaged; title: [XPU][B580] `flex-attn-causal` performance drop with `last_level_cache_size` cache clear between runs",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",02cbe961ebc06748032e9eb92bcfbec0cf1c33c87d96ebbd82b2de4dd7f08754
+BUNDLE-1502,bundle:bundle-1502,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: fsdp (7 issues),issue_group,,module: fsdp needs triage,module: fsdp,Create one module: fsdp triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: fsdp paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"91165, 140183, 143536, 169448, 173680, 182988, 183702",,7,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: fsdp bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #91165: needs triage; labels: high priority, triage review, oncall: distributed, triaged, module: fsdp; title: [FSDP] FSDP with CPU offload consumes `1.65X` more GPU memory when training models with most of the params frozen | issue #169448: needs triage; labels: oncall: distributed, module: fsdp, oncall: distributed checkpointing, bot-triaged, ptd-bot-triaged; title: FSDP2 model saving broken unless ignorin...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",38e6a60e22c7669d9fd6f2634c5adb9c7e5c473a270359cd5d8f1738aaf36bb8
+BUNDLE-1503,bundle:bundle-1503,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: functionalization (1 issue),issue_group,,#84495 functionalize: Does not compose cleanly with torch.jit.script/torch.jit.trace,module: functionalization,Create one module: functionalization triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: functionalization paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,84495,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: functionalization bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #84495: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, module: functionalization; title: functionalize: Does not compose cleanly with torch.jit.script/torch.jit.trace",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",cdd9d6f7e8018a642db44f1b9178a6381ba24cb2c244124e254d8d2b10fa4127
+BUNDLE-1504,bundle:bundle-1504,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: fx (8 issues),issue_group,,module: fx needs triage,module: fx,Create one module: fx triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: fx paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"76181, 103947, 119454, 120437, 149186, 149497, 163312, 175493",,8,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: fx bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #103947: needs triage; labels: high priority, triage review, module: fx, oncall: fx; title: [torch.fx] Deserialization Error - TypeError: ones() received an invalid combination of arguments - got (tuple, device=Attribute) | issue #149497: needs triage; labels: module: fx, oncall: fx; title: symbolic_trace failed on deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B | issue #163312: needs triage; labels: module: fx, o...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",621e5482b16984075039c96f6063b7329723f4ec92682e9ad1dac1b188c07f15
+BUNDLE-1505,bundle:bundle-1505,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: inductor (7 issues),issue_group,,module: inductor needs triage,module: inductor,Create one module: inductor triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: inductor paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"135689, 135690, 136618, 150526, 173546, 173921, 174081",,7,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: inductor bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #173921: needs triage; labels: high priority, oncall: pt2, module: inductor, oncall: cpu inductor, bot-triaged, PT2-Bug-Bash; title: [Inductor] Significant numerical divergence (4.7% relative error) in Conv2d on CPU with torch.compile | issue #150526: needs triage; labels: oncall: pt2, module: inductor, oncall: cpu inductor; title: Consider context when tuning kernels for max-autotune to more accurately refl...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",e9f2d03dcc8ad9401698eddd4c7e2081676037b0a7863d794715ef77f70c7288
+BUNDLE-1506,bundle:bundle-1506,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: intel (1 issue),issue_group,,#61221 Unable to add a scalar to an MKLDNN tensor,module: intel,Create one module: intel triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: intel paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,61221,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: intel bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #61221: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, module: mkldnn, module: intel; title: Unable to add a scalar to an MKLDNN tensor",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",054b67c398e5bd14fd82517da8c49ab98c237323af045f4dc9c0b005360907d7
+BUNDLE-1507,bundle:bundle-1507,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: internals (1 issue),issue_group,,#28786 RPC couldn't match torch.ones with requires_grad=True,module: internals,Create one module: internals triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: internals paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,28786,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: internals bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #28786: needs triage; labels: high priority, triage review, oncall: distributed, module: internals, triaged, better-engineering, module: rpc; title: RPC couldn't match torch.ones with requires_grad=True",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9f5e8303982d1c3384131ab5b396209f1676283b0fb2bbac0e09343880ec447a
+BUNDLE-1508,bundle:bundle-1508,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: ios (6 issues),issue_group,,module: ios needs triage,module: ios,Create one module: ios triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: ios paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"33285, 59551, 66768, 72330, 82216, 85149",,6,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: ios bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #85149: needs triage; labels: oncall: mobile, module: ios; title: Pytorch on iOS (iPhone X & XR) throwing can't allocate memory exception. Ref Logs: | issue #82216: needs triage; labels: oncall: mobile, module: ios; title: iOS TestApp from mobile performance recipes tutorial doesn't build on macOS | issue #72330: needs triage; labels: oncall: mobile, module: ios; title: Add and Mul torch tensors on Metal (IO...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",776143bd57486e2170dc8da46e7e4686f0e2bb7517b02feb701e196012e9357a
+BUNDLE-1509,bundle:bundle-1509,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: lazy (2 issues),issue_group,,module: lazy needs triage,module: lazy,Create one module: lazy triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: lazy paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"63610, 64005",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: lazy bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #63610: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, module: lazy; title: Enable some amount of CI tests on lazy_tensor_staging branch | issue #64005: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, module: lazy; title: [LTC] Find a way to convert at::Generator into torch::jit::NamedValue",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",13965fb5833554317ca7316fd6eba22eba6b868b8df16b128c98b236aaec3590
+BUNDLE-1510,bundle:bundle-1510,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: linear algebra (2 issues),issue_group,,module: linear algebra needs triage,module: linear algebra,Create one module: linear algebra triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: linear algebra paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"52655, 188553",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: linear algebra bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #188553: needs triage; labels: triage review, module: rocm, triaged, module: linear algebra, bot-triaged; title: test_cholesky_solve_batched_many_batches_cuda_float64 fails on ROCm gfx942 (Tensor-likes are not close) | issue #52655: needs triage; labels: module: performance, oncall: jit, feature, module: linear algebra; title: Optimize `einsum` in TorchScript profile guided optimization",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",547dcfc650274bd8ec886a7a58dc721537b9a044705a3c2fbbbf96afcf13866e
+BUNDLE-1511,bundle:bundle-1511,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: loss (2 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #118462: Inconsistency in Output for `torch.nn.functional.poisson_nll_loss` in JIT Compiled Model,module: loss,Create one module: loss triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: loss paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"118462, 118463",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: loss bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"🐛 Describe the bug torch.argmin output is diffrent between eager mode and JIT-compiled mode. Similar with #118462 Allthough the model output is irrelevant from torch.special.erfc, deleting the torch.special.erfc from the code would prevent error from ha",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d12870019f32904588a9c883cec7eb5909b2e4c5ab38f72d18ed4e527d4f2bcd
+BUNDLE-1512,bundle:bundle-1512,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: memory format (1 issue),issue_group,,#72110 Conversion Error in pytorch mobile with metal,module: memory format,Create one module: memory format triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: memory format paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,72110,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: memory format bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #72110: needs triage; labels: module: memory format, oncall: mobile; title: Conversion Error in pytorch mobile with metal",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",4fa12307e85cf816fa4ce452a5280ac2ec0342457e79c112af2a4a5f744c7d1f
+BUNDLE-1513,bundle:bundle-1513,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: memory usage (1 issue),issue_group,,#146698 Possible memory leak when running test_model_exports_to_core_aten.py test,module: memory usage,Create one module: memory usage triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: memory usage paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,146698,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: memory usage bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #146698: needs triage; labels: module: memory usage, oncall: pt2, oncall: export; title: Possible memory leak when running test_model_exports_to_core_aten.py test",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b5f2a18e5a28cf1c0ca87f9ea53863f2c139544d6255a2c734ee911c61dd992c
+BUNDLE-1514,bundle:bundle-1514,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: mkldnn (3 issues),issue_group,,module: mkldnn needs triage,module: mkldnn,Create one module: mkldnn triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: mkldnn paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"56024, 61267, 86667",,3,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: mkldnn bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #86667: needs triage; labels: triage review, oncall: jit, module: mkldnn; title: Adding a linear layer leads to failure of `optimize_for_mobile` | issue #61267: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, module: mkldnn; title: Incorrect trace with MKLDNN (adding scalar) | issue #56024: needs triage; labels: oncall: distributed, module: mkldnn; title: Support for mkldnn + ddp",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1bc4a06ca5fa842f624a58050a846ca71b5e61dcf454c9926b2d13122ff646b4
+BUNDLE-1515,bundle:bundle-1515,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: multithreading (2 issues),issue_group,,module: multithreading needs triage,module: multithreading,Create one module: multithreading triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: multithreading paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"52047, 64795",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: multithreading bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #52047: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, module: tests, module: multithreading, days; title: Detect OpenMP Loop and this application may hang warnings | issue #64795: needs triage; labels: oncall: distributed, module: multithreading, oncall: profiler; title: profiler crashes the program when trying to stop on different threads without context manager",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7c7a9a442f5f34d056ae7971fa79dba36209a1f96ebe24fa34a15441fbbe2c36
+BUNDLE-1516,bundle:bundle-1516,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: nans and infs (1 issue),issue_group,,#154708 torch.quantized_batch_norm API return different output when input is nan/inf or undefined mathematical calculation method,module: nans and infs,Create one module: nans and infs triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: nans and infs paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,154708,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: nans and infs bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #154708: needs triage; labels: needs reproduction, oncall: quantization, module: NaNs and Infs; title: torch.quantized_batch_norm API return different output when input is nan/inf or undefined mathematical calculation method",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",838800e9cc07c7c90261413f6c141ac8f8720d3ede05167fe88fbba9989f1cf1
+BUNDLE-1517,bundle:bundle-1517,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: nccl (10 issues),issue_group,,module: nccl needs triage,module: nccl,Create one module: nccl triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: nccl paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"52471, 68893, 70267, 86849, 109941, 114396, 129341, 137016, 172873, 178138",,10,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: nccl bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #172873: needs triage; labels: oncall: distributed, module: nccl, module: symm_mem, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed infra, ptd-bot-triaged; title: Need for all_reduce to initialize NCCL communicator | issue #137016: needs triage; labels: oncall: distributed, feature, module: nccl, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed infra, ptd-bot-triaged; title: [RFC] Accelerate intra-node communication via NCCL buffer regist...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a9d3b7192e3c3e11e847297c01b1b6c031f315c83776b1270ab542bb0d8c775e
+BUNDLE-1518,bundle:bundle-1518,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: nestedtensor (1 issue),issue_group,,#156544 `TorchScript` does not allow accessing methods of nested tensors,module: nestedtensor,Create one module: nestedtensor triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: nestedtensor paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,156544,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: nestedtensor bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #156544: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, module: nestedtensor; title: `TorchScript` does not allow accessing methods of nested tensors",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",672fcfd3ad1c6f6430a3a0d6cc81c8a6e6f19f5a1ed0a24f1d5f9f7dc87a19c9
+BUNDLE-1519,bundle:bundle-1519,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: nn (3 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #42847: Get test_jit.py below 10k lines,module: nn,Create one module: nn triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: nn paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"42847, 63085, 115511",,3,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: nn bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"Update: the test_nn.py part of this is now tracked by #63085 Currently, many files, such as test_jit.py and test_nn.py, are larger than what GitHub can handle. For these files, you will not be able to | issue #115511: needs triage; labels: module: nn, oncall: export; title: [Export] aten::_transformer_encoder_layer_fwd is not core aten and has no decomposition.",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",84e1cf264a30f41145d0a885c010b766200ddabfb4fd7a0ff87bd7c25753f1f0
+BUNDLE-1520,bundle:bundle-1520,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: nn.utils.parametrize (1 issue),issue_group,,#60971 jit scripting for the parametrizations,module: nn.utils.parametrize,Create one module: nn.utils.parametrize triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: nn.utils.parametrize paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,60971,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: nn.utils.parametrize bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #60971: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, module: nn.utils.parametrize; title: jit scripting for the parametrizations",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",810da1b5c05f34e2d2af5c38e861f57a99c99c7dcb9f6e7e63567117b086acb5
+BUNDLE-1521,bundle:bundle-1521,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: nvfuser (3 issues),issue_group,,module: nvfuser needs triage,module: nvfuser,Create one module: nvfuser triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: nvfuser paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"75903, 80606, 94908",,3,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: nvfuser bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #94908: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, module: nvfuser; title: ASSERT(initialized()) Debug Error after JIT fusion on Windows | issue #75903: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, NNC, module: nvfuser; title: torch.jit.script'd function very slow on first invocation on latest nightly | issue #80606: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, module: nvfuser; title: [jit.script] jit.script give uncertain results usin...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",37bd822cdd2a6de3084f721cd434c57aadbd9085a8018b868756a8288207be64
+BUNDLE-1522,bundle:bundle-1522,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: onnx (7 issues),issue_group,,module: onnx needs triage,module: onnx,Create one module: onnx triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: onnx paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"47887, 74799, 120166, 133227, 134303, 141854, 172561",,7,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: onnx bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #172561: needs triage; labels: module: onnx, onnx-triaged, oncall: pt2, oncall: export; title: [export] Constraint expression suggested by torch export is not supported | issue #133227: needs triage; labels: needs reproduction, module: onnx, onnx-needs-info, oncall: export; title: Issue Exporting PyTorch Model with pytorch3d.ops.ball_query to ONNX: Bug or Compatibility Problem? | issue #141854: needs triage;...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d15192596d8617a78d1da70fb7b8250defdc85d314c731aa4b5c2281f15f470d
+BUNDLE-1523,bundle:bundle-1523,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: op-unification (1 issue),issue_group,,#14750 [caffe2] ConvTranspose with group attribute,module: op-unification,Create one module: op-unification triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: op-unification paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,14750,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: op-unification bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #14750: needs triage; labels: caffe2, module: op-unification; title: [caffe2] ConvTranspose with group attribute",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b8009a622abee6482e11326e8af69977015e51b2f478fba8f7e5b4a4fccf4c21
+BUNDLE-1524,bundle:bundle-1524,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: optimizer (1 issue),issue_group,,#60440 DDP with cuda rpc failed with DistributedOptimizer Adagrad,module: optimizer,Create one module: optimizer triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: optimizer paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,60440,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: optimizer bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #60440: needs triage; labels: oncall: distributed, module: optimizer; title: DDP with cuda rpc failed with DistributedOptimizer Adagrad",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a28e686049a7e1633f19e6ca624453553b62a22451beb8e4750b2269acb6927d
+BUNDLE-1525,bundle:bundle-1525,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: power (4 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #92910: torch.jit.save() generates different contents in a file among different endian machines,module: power,Create one module: power triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: power paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"41242, 92910, 92987, 110332",,4,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: power bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"the multiple-byte data without swapping on a big-endian machine while pickle serialization store data as mostly little-endian (as shown in #92910). Versions PyTorch version: 2.0.0a0+git215f4fc Is debug build: True CUDA used to build PyTorch: None ROCM used to build PyTorch: N/... | issue #110332: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, module: POWER; title: `torch.jit.load()` might unresponsive in IBM s390x when loadin...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d34760c148a8dfad4b090acb1394a8f2621a7c7fd15ad02c18a410a452d4a3a0
+BUNDLE-1526,bundle:bundle-1526,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: privateuse1 (2 issues),issue_group,,module: privateuse1 needs triage,module: privateuse1,Create one module: privateuse1 triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: privateuse1 paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"166205, 169357",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: privateuse1 bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #166205: needs triage; labels: feature, oncall: profiler, module: PrivateUse1; title: Enable Graph Capture & Profiler Integration for PrivateUse1 Backends | issue #169357: needs triage; labels: oncall: profiler, module: PrivateUse1; title: prepareProfiler() skips collecting info of ""privateuseone""",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6f15b11ecda8fcc35d998b92dfd04656795756f167cc5102ed9162c224395486
+BUNDLE-1527,bundle:bundle-1527,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: pt2-dispatcher (1 issue),issue_group,,"#124328 PreDispatch tracing doesn't produce correct ""val"" for Sparse Fake tensors.",module: pt2-dispatcher,Create one module: pt2-dispatcher triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: pt2-dispatcher paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,124328,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: pt2-dispatcher bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #124328: needs triage; labels: oncall: export, module: pt2-dispatcher, PT2-Bug-Bash; title: PreDispatch tracing doesn't produce correct ""val"" for Sparse Fake tensors.",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a74599063e15e53214e03ce5d09a198ccff98e802e101b91255f44cdf2779088
+BUNDLE-1528,bundle:bundle-1528,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: python frontend (2 issues),issue_group,,module: python frontend needs triage,module: python frontend,Create one module: python frontend triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: python frontend paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"106764, 142170",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: python frontend bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #142170: needs triage; labels: oncall: package/deploy, module: python frontend; title: [3.13] Fix failing torch.package dynamo-wrapped test | issue #106764: needs triage; labels: triage review, oncall: jit, feature, module: python frontend; title: [Feature request] Add new API Tensor.device_as",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1d06e6557d07c6f44c7d1be14104aa7d353cce7ef31463b094a07088dd7ec95c
+BUNDLE-1529,bundle:bundle-1529,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: python version (2 issues),issue_group,,module: python version needs triage,module: python version,Create one module: python version triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: python version paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"124190, 172254",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: python version bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #172254: needs triage; labels: needs reproduction, oncall: jit, module: python version; title: Python 3.14 test error: `AttributeError: 'MobileNetV2' object has no attribute '__annotations__'.` | issue #124190: needs triage; labels: oncall: profiler, module: python version; title: Re-enable skipped 3.12 dynamo-wrapped profiler tests",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ada9183f45f34a13aeb2f70f8f396cb261656fa24a7020d32a6f09ad986d8cdf
+BUNDLE-1530,bundle:bundle-1530,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: regression (3 issues),issue_group,,module: regression needs triage,module: regression,Create one module: regression triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: regression paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"81115, 100253, 153941",,3,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: regression bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #100253: needs triage; labels: high priority, module: regression, oncall: profiler; title: profiler.export_stacks doesn't return stack trace unless experimental_config is provided | issue #153941: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, module: regression; title: TorchScript Fails Type Inference When Using .item()-Derived Scalar in Tensor Construction | issue #81115: needs triage; labels: high priority, module: v...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",bd44b6ad2996e7a9e71430dfad9a4d7c78f3467c373ec63fea90981f87b5feb5
+BUNDLE-1531,bundle:bundle-1531,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: rocm (2 issues),issue_group,,module: rocm needs triage,module: rocm,Create one module: rocm triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: rocm paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"177309, 182373",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: rocm bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #182373: needs triage; labels: module: rocm, oncall: profiler, bot-triaged; title: [ROCm] torch.profiler drops GPU activity in spawn child if parent calls torch.cuda.init() (regression in 2.12, 2.10/2.11 pass) | issue #177309: needs triage; labels: oncall: distributed, module: rocm, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed infra, ptd-bot-triaged; title: [ROCm][NCCL watchdog] Cross-thread stream-capture mode restrict...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",919b0969bd5786d75ea0f42476e126238f812c4081874060c99a2d0af1c8d760
+BUNDLE-1532,bundle:bundle-1532,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: rpc (6 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #39351: Clean up RPC request callback implementation,module: rpc,Create one module: rpc triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: rpc paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"39351, 46564, 51616, 66624, 86962, 106711",,6,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: rpc bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"Is this the same as #39351? | issue #106711: needs triage; labels: oncall: distributed, module: rpc, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed infra, ptd-bot-triaged; title: 'CUDA out of memory' when using a GPU services for reinforcement learning in Torch rpc tutorial | issue #86962: needs triage; labels: oncall: distributed, module: rpc, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed infra, ptd-bot-triaged; title: PyTorch RPC crashed...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",154a5bdae89802e1f50bb6396e81831edfa799245ed8f10587f47d51968df353
+BUNDLE-1533,bundle:bundle-1533,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: sanitizers (1 issue),issue_group,,"#71849 addcmul, byte_channels_last fail test_nnc_correctness opinfo tests under UBSAN",module: sanitizers,Create one module: sanitizers triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: sanitizers paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,71849,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: sanitizers bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #71849: needs triage; labels: module: sanitizers, NNC; title: addcmul, byte_channels_last fail test_nnc_correctness opinfo tests under UBSAN",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f1469165d8a98f03316f9bae3448a8b05b63f48e782f04684a014f749f5d13bc
+BUNDLE-1534,bundle:bundle-1534,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: serialization (2 issues),issue_group,,module: serialization needs triage,module: serialization,Create one module: serialization triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: serialization paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"38273, 57716",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: serialization bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #57716: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, module: serialization, module: vision; title: Unknown builtin op: torchvision::nms in LibTorch | issue #38273: needs triage; labels: triage review, oncall: jit, module: serialization; title: Adding model metadata in TorchScript model file",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",8e0c78404e8f845feaee44ed41c4a10a3725bc2f64eb50c40fd5246b081deb0a
+BUNDLE-1535,bundle:bundle-1535,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: sparse (1 issue),issue_group,,#160631 torch.quantize_per_tensor not implemented for SparseCPU tensors,module: sparse,Create one module: sparse triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: sparse paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,160631,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: sparse bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #160631: needs triage; labels: module: sparse, oncall: quantization; title: torch.quantize_per_tensor not implemented for SparseCPU tensors",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a468e6381773597e4b70768d6567c7be024b0f9a39455e29b47eccd63ef7a55a
+BUNDLE-1536,bundle:bundle-1536,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: static linking (1 issue),issue_group,,#9797 Build torch as a submodule with static linking doesn't work (CAFFE2_PERF_WITH_AVX2 is not defined),module: static linking,Create one module: static linking triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: static linking paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,9797,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: static linking bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #9797: needs triage; labels: caffe2, module: static linking; title: Build torch as a submodule with static linking doesn't work (CAFFE2_PERF_WITH_AVX2 is not defined)",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c8a569810f7077992009e4b818532fc2550677575c498d03b7c6d9e0bce122a4
+BUNDLE-1537,bundle:bundle-1537,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: symm_mem (3 issues),issue_group,,module: symm_mem needs triage,module: symm_mem,Create one module: symm_mem triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: symm_mem paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"167966, 172617, 176439",,3,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: symm_mem bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #176439: needs triage; labels: oncall: distributed, feature, module: symm_mem, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed infra, ptd-bot-triaged; title: [wip][RFC] Symmetric Memory pool explicit lending semantics | issue #172617: needs triage; labels: oncall: distributed, module: symm_mem, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed infra, ptd-bot-triaged; title: Symmetric utils missing | issue #167966: needs triage; labels: onc...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",759411b27cd08e09f91cd9c1433e24fc07936033c2ee6778fd3cdfcb5500e31a
+BUNDLE-1538,bundle:bundle-1538,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: tensorboard (19 issues),issue_group,,module: tensorboard needs triage batch 1,module: tensorboard,Create one module: tensorboard triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: tensorboard paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"30525, 30812, 33670, 33691, 35095, 36718, 37740, 39292, 40500, 42379, 45327, 46907, 64258, 75502, 90915, 101962, 125033, 144148, 173311",,19,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: tensorboard bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #101962: needs triage; labels: triage review, oncall: distributed, module: tensorboard, bot-triaged, ptd-bot-triaged; title: SummaryWriter background thread holds the GIL for too long | issue #173311: needs triage; labels: module: tensorboard, oncall: profiler; title: Issue: Remove unnecessary restriction on num_thresholds in TensorBoard PR curve summary | issue #30525: needs triage; labels: needs reproducti...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d44bfcb112ac3038dc0d97ec7b3cb6b81eda2ec4b922d60c15171029935c3ee0
+BUNDLE-1539,bundle:bundle-1539,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: tensorpipe (1 issue),issue_group,,#60640 Building fails on a node with libibverbs installed with no Infiniband hardware present on RHEL8.,module: tensorpipe,Create one module: tensorpipe triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: tensorpipe paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,60640,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: tensorpipe bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #60640: needs triage; labels: oncall: distributed, module: tensorpipe; title: Building fails on a node with libibverbs installed with no Infiniband hardware present on RHEL8.",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9e553524563c0946f7792bf8e145c897d3e7c2e21e5cd2ae74ebbaa32181b0ca
+BUNDLE-1540,bundle:bundle-1540,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: testing (1 issue),issue_group,,"#146776 INTERNAL ASSERT FAILED at ""/pytorch/torch/csrc/jit/testing/file_check.cpp"":607, please report a bug to PyTorch",module: testing,Create one module: testing triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: testing paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,146776,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: testing bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #146776: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, module: testing; title: INTERNAL ASSERT FAILED at ""/pytorch/torch/csrc/jit/testing/file_check.cpp"":607, please report a bug to PyTorch",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5dbd8780ea653fc647ac534a9a657b1bf7c5b4eb294d40a294bb09213485a3a5
+BUNDLE-1541,bundle:bundle-1541,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: tests (8 issues),issue_group,,module: tests needs triage,module: tests,Create one module: tests triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: tests paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"56314, 58507, 64119, 64518, 66894, 67646, 83606, 92175",,8,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: tests bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #83606: needs triage; labels: high priority, triage review, module: tests, triaged, oncall: profiler; title: test_profiler_experimental_tree_cuda_detailed is too unstable, and as its CUDA only difficult to regen | issue #67646: needs triage; labels: high priority, triage review, oncall: jit, module: tests, NNC; title: test_jit_fuser_legacy and test_jit_fuser_te are failing with SIGIOT | issue #66894: needs t...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",cb7c2e0c4c9d6e5aded7ed6cbde0f98fbddea749239de3671a043b53b73a9e8d
+BUNDLE-1542,bundle:bundle-1542,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: typing (1 issue),issue_group,,#123464 torch._C.JitType annotation is busted,module: typing,Create one module: typing triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: typing paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,123464,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: typing bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #123464: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, module: typing; title: torch._C.JitType annotation is busted",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",a2ceb401096aa9fbe845bb3ca632e55b2632bc9007cccfdbfb0360979096d8d8
+BUNDLE-1543,bundle:bundle-1543,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: vision (2 issues),issue_group,,module: vision needs triage,module: vision,Create one module: vision triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: vision paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"82598, 91738",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: vision bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #91738: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, module: vision; title: tracing torchvision detection model results in an error | issue #82598: needs triage; labels: triage review, triaged, module: vision, oncall: fx; title: Deep copy models with `create_feature_extractor` produces different parameters",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",95ac91d36ce470c9a1ae37cb9d8073edc8859991cf36a96c59c19a4b09df4c75
+BUNDLE-1544,bundle:bundle-1544,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: vllm (1 issue),issue_group,,#174288 [distributed] Batched isend/irecv with NCCL backend hangs on high load,module: vllm,Create one module: vllm triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: vllm paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,174288,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: vllm bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #174288: needs triage; labels: high priority, triage review, oncall: distributed, triaged, module: vllm, bot-triaged, oncall: distributed infra, ptd-bot-triaged; title: [distributed] Batched isend/irecv with NCCL backend hangs on high load",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",41d5b451f4d1238b60545d3ac18ad076462f8e149c9622df2ce5a9bf4aa7f33f
+BUNDLE-1545,bundle:bundle-1545,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: vulkan (4 issues),issue_group,,module: vulkan needs triage,module: vulkan,Create one module: vulkan triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: vulkan paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"56006, 82065, 84831, 116662",,4,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: vulkan bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #116662: needs triage; labels: oncall: mobile, module: vulkan; title: test/test_vulkan.py fails with vulkan_prepack::conv2d_clamp_prepack not found | issue #82065: needs triage; labels: oncall: mobile, module: vulkan; title: optimize_for_mobile vulkan_prepack::conv2d_clamp_prepack | issue #84831: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, oncall: mobile, module: vulkan; title: INTERNAL ASSERT FAILED for _jit_pass_vu...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",0742d2a0db1e9a29b5f22f726dce23578a101238de5c36659365e4ced67b1599
+BUNDLE-1546,bundle:bundle-1546,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: windows (2 issues),issue_group,,module: windows needs triage,module: windows,Create one module: windows triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: windows paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"146127, 161815",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: windows bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #161815: needs triage; labels: module: windows, oncall: releng, better-engineering; title: Windows AMI release issues and improvements | issue #146127: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, module: windows; title: When I try to run rt-detr model in C++ libtorch i face the given error",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",6d63a4e2342536f6129e2d16794db00b740d30617569228148fc6408242825aa
+BUNDLE-1547,bundle:bundle-1547,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: xla (1 issue),issue_group,,#96448 Unable to move torch.jit.load-ed models to XLA devices,module: xla,Create one module: xla triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: xla paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,96448,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: xla bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #96448: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, module: xla; title: Unable to move torch.jit.load-ed models to XLA devices",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ef25b17c30faf1a483e1af2fc142aefbc0c31d4d2320cbf908bfc74a986f27e3
+BUNDLE-1548,bundle:bundle-1548,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: xnnpack (1 issue),issue_group,,#92246 test_qnnpack_add fails,module: xnnpack,Create one module: xnnpack triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: xnnpack paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,92246,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: xnnpack bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #92246: needs triage; labels: oncall: mobile, module: xnnpack; title: test_qnnpack_add fails",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7c326ff1048cb65f8068d5bcb6333e0f1d893411977b8a382bcf36dc3475c5b8
+BUNDLE-1549,bundle:bundle-1549,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: module: xpu (1 issue),issue_group,,"#171689 After enabling XPU Graph, I cannot collect profile data during the replay phase.",module: xpu,Create one module: xpu triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for module: xpu paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,171689,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This module: xpu bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #171689: needs triage; labels: oncall: profiler, module: xpu; title: After enabling XPU Graph, I cannot collect profile data during the replay phase.",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d9b7427bb7aa1d1091cd7780fba33079f1024c1182f91438e8581487c66be1fa
+BUNDLE-1550,bundle:bundle-1550,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: oncall: cpu inductor (21 issues),issue_group,,oncall: cpu inductor needs triage batch 1,oncall: cpu inductor,Create one oncall: cpu inductor triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for oncall: cpu inductor paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"124697, 134679, 135569, 137691, 140689, 143886, 144039, 146824, 146974, 147919, 148071, 148382, 149501, 151525, 151536, 152921, 160391, 162135, 167199, 183888, 188227",,21,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: cpu inductor bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #188227: needs triage; labels: oncall: pt2, oncall: cpu inductor, bot-triaged; title: [inductor] generated kernel calls `empty_strided_cpu` with a negative stride → `Expected result >= 0` | issue #151525: needs triage; labels: oncall: pt2, oncall: cpu inductor; title: [inductor] [cpu] [silent incorrectness] `nn.LazyConvTranspose2d-torch.randn-F.linear-torch.argmax` output incorrect results on CPU inductor |...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2850ea1734f43fba4b18a576780b7efd23724de88dcdf9a322a5d274b0cd3540
+BUNDLE-1551,bundle:bundle-1551,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: oncall: distributed (70 issues),issue_group,,oncall: distributed needs triage batch 1,oncall: distributed,Create one oncall: distributed triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for oncall: distributed paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"35372, 47999, 51574, 51931, 51932, 54524, 54912, 56111, 58982, 59441, 59823, 60518, 62381, 62474, 63455, 64130, 64150, 64419, 64799, 65052, 65907, 65918, 66046, 66547, 67972, 68256, 68785, 69522, 69563, 70037, 70099, 73602, 76039, 80151, 91535, 102186, 123983, 124007, 130515, 162466, 164929, 166301, 174669, 175145, 175724, 176276, 177371, 177730, 178191, 178473, 178756, 179770, 180550, 181061, 181086, 182102, 182915, 184010, 184147, 186591, 186938, 187138, 187432, 188193, 188266, 188304, 188567, 188833, 189228, 189308",,70,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: distributed bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #164929: needs triage; labels: high priority, triage review, oncall: distributed, triaged, oncall: distributed checkpointing; title: get_optimizer_state_dict modifies optimizer state | issue #73602: needs triage; labels: high priority, triage review, oncall: distributed, triaged; title: Report DDP efficiency metric to users and guide them for setting up DDP correctly | issue #80151: needs triage; labels: hig...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",d0ca9d54539747ab8b1d268ee2f7337d7dc88059b3e3358711ddebf5eff7379b
+BUNDLE-1552,bundle:bundle-1552,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: oncall: distributed (3 issues),issue_group,,oncall: distributed needs triage batch 6,oncall: distributed,Create one oncall: distributed triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for oncall: distributed paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"8818, 48710, 48928",,3,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: distributed bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #48928: needs triage; labels: oncall: distributed; title: When multiple GPUs run multiple processes, it is found that any process not running in GPU 0 will have some more memory (such as 200m) in GPU 0. What is the cause of this?（多个GPU跑多进程时候，发现只要不在0号GPU跑的进程都会在0号GPU多出一些内存(如200M)，请问这是什么情况导致的？） | issue #8818: needs triage; labels: oncall: distributed; title: MPI causing job to hang --- unresponsive to external...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",813b0440c373a0ed4e24703fde01db5493d48b8ee40d17ab2c761fea48697867
+BUNDLE-1553,bundle:bundle-1553,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: oncall: distributed checkpointing (1 issue),issue_group,,#162948 Metadata object loses arbitrary attributes added dynamically,oncall: distributed checkpointing,Create one oncall: distributed checkpointing triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for oncall: distributed checkpointing paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,162948,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: distributed checkpointing bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,issue #162948: needs triage; labels: oncall: distributed checkpointing; title: Metadata object loses arbitrary attributes added dynamically,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",9cdb1c0e7f3ab54e76e3ccd8c12bfa7885f7e8d0a9780b97c142159f4bca9f40
+BUNDLE-1554,bundle:bundle-1554,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: oncall: export (58 issues),issue_group,,oncall: export needs triage batch 1,oncall: export,Create one oncall: export triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for oncall: export paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"113572, 121191, 122934, 123345, 125007, 126291, 126770, 127357, 127571, 127643, 128385, 130555, 130820, 130861, 131941, 132459, 133255, 139470, 141116, 141893, 141996, 143379, 144331, 144683, 145456, 146152, 146315, 146576, 147187, 151654, 151726, 152283, 152465, 153429, 153705, 154853, 155550, 155862, 156882, 157625, 159316, 163791, 164083, 165395, 167631, 167645, 167730, 169009, 170548, 170673, 170783, 171516, 172930, 176148, 177510, 178618, 179176, 184647",,58,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: export bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #113572: needs triage; labels: high priority, triage review, triaged, export-triage-review, oncall: export; title: Deepcopying an exported model changes numerics for MobileNetV2 | issue #172930: needs triage; labels: oncall: pt2, oncall: export; title: torch.export failed while exporting alpamayo model (Qwen3_vl) with symbolic error | issue #178618: needs triage; labels: oncall: pt2, oncall: export, bot-tria...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",05748b198e7dfbc060cfb898e62b5d51a39c955341231231d5743bbda4536409
+BUNDLE-1555,bundle:bundle-1555,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: oncall: export (7 issues),issue_group,,oncall: export needs triage batch 5,oncall: export,Create one oncall: export triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for oncall: export paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"115055, 115488, 116544, 118410, 119484, 124507, 124796",,7,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: export bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #124796: needs triage; labels: oncall: pt2, oncall: export; title: Dynamo Export Support for Qwen/Qwen-7B-Chat: Mutating module attribute _ntk_alpha_cached_list during export | issue #124507: needs triage; labels: oncall: export; title: torch.export of ResNet with dynamic height fails due to constraint violation | issue #119484: needs triage; labels: onnx-needs-info, export-triaged, oncall: export; title: Fo...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",ff47be32f3658d916b61fd849950f17deb683f3f6990c19baaa0e7d5c6a21489
+BUNDLE-1556,bundle:bundle-1556,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: oncall: fx (6 issues),issue_group,,oncall: fx needs triage,oncall: fx,Create one oncall: fx triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for oncall: fx paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"88574, 91000, 92812, 93002, 98422, 115818",,6,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: fx bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #115818: needs triage; labels: high priority, triage review, triaged, oncall: fx; title: Fx graph recompilation along with partitioner produces different node order even though graph operations are same | issue #91000: needs triage; labels: oncall: fx; title: node.stack_trace does not handle escaping correctly | issue #98422: needs triage; labels: oncall: fx; title: [FX] Symbolic trace over `torch.Tensor.${f...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5c8f9913b38a8b14d016d70ec3898eb655cf8812a2ffa0a0739aaa7b286eb245
+BUNDLE-1557,bundle:bundle-1557,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: oncall: java (5 issues),issue_group,,oncall: java needs triage,oncall: java,Create one oncall: java triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for oncall: java paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"33631, 49536, 78483, 83551, 89868",,5,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: java bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #89868: needs triage; labels: oncall: java; title: No pytorch_jni.dll file in libtorch 1.13.0 lib folder | issue #78483: needs triage; labels: oncall: java; title: is the issue resolved? windows not pytorch_jni in path | issue #83551: needs triage; labels: oncall: java; title: OpenJDK libtorch_cpu.so stack guard warning | issue #49536: needs triage; labels: oncall: mobile, oncall: java; title: Pytorch mobile...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3e2f765d46bf0bd09d4dbbdbac4eed4bbae398c2240d4116cfb296185c2163ae
+BUNDLE-1558,bundle:bundle-1558,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: oncall: jit (43 issues),issue_group,,"Review thread: 2 issues - issue #144965: RuntimeError ""global alloc not supported yet"" when using TorchScript optimization.",oncall: jit,Create one oncall: jit triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for oncall: jit paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"16592, 33692, 35998, 40867, 41289, 41695, 42258, 42317, 43548, 46944, 46946, 47218, 50444, 51135, 51136, 51137, 51138, 51140, 51563, 51856, 52920, 53017, 53022, 60930, 61210, 67541, 69078, 81085, 106846, 144965, 173643, 175708, 177239, 178044, 181231, 181473, 181480, 183520, 185440, 185441, 185442, 185443, 189309",,43,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: jit bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"der some specific conditions, raise a RuntimeError with message: ""Global alloc not supported yet."". I think this is linked to an old issue: #69078, however, I managed to consistently reproduce this error. The code that reproduces the bug is quite long and needs some explanatio... | issue #81085: needs triage; labels: high priority, triage review, oncall: jit; title: RuntimeError: required keyword attribute 'value'...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",49a9fb50449c702fd1dcc5eccafe6a6c6b415159675d43ddb0a9975dd08fb15a
+BUNDLE-1559,bundle:bundle-1559,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: oncall: jit (70 issues),issue_group,,oncall: jit needs triage batch 3,oncall: jit,Create one oncall: jit triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for oncall: jit paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"15342, 36061, 49460, 65607, 69250, 70450, 70544, 75960, 76026, 76774, 81855, 81912, 82550, 92041, 107568, 111142, 112372, 114112, 121581, 132240, 134922, 134923, 134924, 134937, 134971, 136654, 136829, 137202, 137561, 138973, 139556, 140101, 140468, 140539, 140702, 141855, 143831, 143854, 143857, 145995, 146757, 146758, 146759, 146760, 146773, 146775, 146778, 147055, 147444, 147739, 147844, 148447, 148543, 149223, 149251, 149391, 149619, 149736, 149800, 160392, 161854, 161935, 163945, 164208, 165400, 165900, 167412, 168077, 170680, 171377",,70,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: jit bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #15342: needs triage; labels: needs reproduction, oncall: jit; title: [JIT] Batch op. batch_sum return a mask which is on cpu | issue #171377: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, low priority; title: PyTorch JIT `get_debug_state()` triggers INTERNAL ASSERT FAILED after `torch.jit.trace` | issue #170680: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit; title: Error when composing jit.script and jacrev | issue #168077: needs...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",1b2ec0bbec416d35f5327528d63c2db368a60f4e60f7f14968b106324027629b
+BUNDLE-1560,bundle:bundle-1560,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: oncall: jit (70 issues),issue_group,,oncall: jit needs triage batch 51,oncall: jit,Create one oncall: jit triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for oncall: jit paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"7904, 9595, 14270, 15116, 17126, 18312, 28191, 28267, 29125, 29128, 33281, 33810, 33993, 34851, 35526, 35606, 36211, 36603, 36926, 38744, 39309, 39539, 39569, 40696, 41141, 41291, 41418, 41433, 41683, 42081, 42145, 42170, 42947, 42948, 43119, 43134, 43378, 44446, 44503, 44608, 44800, 44992, 45012, 46368, 46654, 47010, 47335, 47682, 47883, 48089, 48090, 48094, 48307, 48984, 49253, 49377, 94974, 150342, 150577, 150607, 151165, 151233, 151428, 151468, 153224, 153722, 153931, 154101, 154407, 154423",,70,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: jit bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #35526: needs triage; labels: triage review, oncall: jit, triaged; title: RuntimeError during converting Reformer model to TorchScript | issue #35606: needs triage; labels: triage review, oncall: jit, triaged; title: Could not find any similar ops to ""foo..."" in the `Libtorch` | issue #34851: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, low priority; title: [jit] `__hash__` magic method is missing | issue #29125: need...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",131fcd580b9b2ecf82ebcd2e5f4c6b3a3e0bd327469d870b54a99e3c5de2d1fe
+BUNDLE-1561,bundle:bundle-1561,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: oncall: jit (70 issues),issue_group,,oncall: jit needs triage batch 47,oncall: jit,Create one oncall: jit triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for oncall: jit paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"13164, 35215, 39690, 41046, 41415, 41512, 41513, 42673, 43249, 43261, 43765, 43873, 45199, 45524, 47692, 48191, 48408, 48869, 49261, 49569, 49585, 49614, 49650, 49820, 49935, 50127, 50772, 50834, 50933, 50971, 51055, 51379, 51409, 51465, 51808, 51942, 52147, 52309, 52589, 52599, 52720, 52768, 52772, 52777, 52795, 52821, 53140, 53344, 53414, 53753, 53824, 53862, 53867, 53877, 53878, 53904, 53921, 54146, 54348, 54365, 54435, 54598, 54625, 55072, 55194, 55541, 56096, 56159, 56571, 57035",,70,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: jit bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #41513: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, days, TSUsability, TSRootCause:UnsupportedConstructs; title: Python object None check not supported | issue #41415: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, weeks, TSUsability, TSRootCause:UnsupportedConstructs; title: [jit] `set` builtin support | issue #41046: needs triage; labels: triage review, oncall: jit, TSUsability, TSRootCause:PoorIRVisibility; title: Human-reada...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",5305003b40ada0bbc2371ca525107041b2b11ec7d756ec295a43cdcc30507545
+BUNDLE-1562,bundle:bundle-1562,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: oncall: jit (70 issues),issue_group,,oncall: jit needs triage batch 42,oncall: jit,Create one oncall: jit triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for oncall: jit paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"8473, 34713, 42267, 42592, 48066, 50734, 53421, 53472, 53744, 54593, 54937, 55282, 55742, 55749, 55999, 56660, 56969, 57313, 57559, 57592, 57639, 57717, 57739, 57793, 57894, 58516, 58804, 58836, 58857, 58907, 59114, 59153, 59174, 59528, 59652, 59806, 60143, 60359, 60732, 60847, 62154, 62325, 62394, 62543, 62556, 62603, 62775, 62854, 63124, 63405, 63648, 64096, 64247, 64260, 64334, 64487, 64628, 111480, 130309, 154478, 154502, 154607, 155003, 155004, 155007, 155009, 156557, 157103, 157603, 158227",,70,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: jit bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,issue #42267: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit; title: assertRaisesRegxWithHighlight isn't triggered correctly | issue #58857: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit; title: Call non class methods from `torch::jit::Module` in C++ | issue #58836: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit; title: Latest nightly produces CUDA torchscript that cannot be run | issue #58804: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit; title: A Null pointer...,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f67e190d9bbc388d614484d2bb6c5b6b7e035bf038c2f5d8f34641fd051d7c52
+BUNDLE-1563,bundle:bundle-1563,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: oncall: jit (70 issues),issue_group,,oncall: jit needs triage batch 38,oncall: jit,Create one oncall: jit triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for oncall: jit paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"14455, 17932, 18520, 41416, 41492, 43237, 49643, 51154, 51892, 51941, 52214, 52271, 54612, 54821, 56595, 57929, 58456, 59905, 63395, 64490, 64775, 64896, 64918, 64957, 65098, 65144, 65297, 65397, 65398, 65611, 65630, 65643, 65776, 65814, 65824, 65915, 65983, 66065, 66150, 66651, 66791, 66816, 66841, 67099, 67160, 67420, 67458, 67473, 67474, 67542, 67659, 67838, 67889, 68064, 68065, 68759, 68800, 68968, 69084, 69320, 69608, 69938, 70573, 70627, 71151, 71165, 71286, 71288, 71784, 72029",,70,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: jit bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #65630: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit; title: Constants in torch.Jit.script | issue #65611: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit; title: `torch.jit.trace` fails claiming ""forward method already defined"" | issue #65397: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit; title: Vague linkage when using libcxxabi built torch in torch_glow | issue #65398: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit; title: [JIT] JIT does not support non...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",b86ba18afb4d93e15f5ddb8ca77f6dc6b59b17b86f8e60ef6acd16f95c7309e8
+BUNDLE-1564,bundle:bundle-1564,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: oncall: jit (70 issues),issue_group,,oncall: jit needs triage batch 33,oncall: jit,Create one oncall: jit triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for oncall: jit paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"30365, 41417, 46460, 47162, 55211, 58744, 62313, 67142, 69434, 69435, 69814, 69830, 69931, 70102, 70223, 70240, 70511, 71912, 71929, 72220, 72338, 72516, 72617, 72746, 73072, 73419, 73571, 73608, 74030, 74095, 74589, 75005, 75038, 75217, 75280, 75309, 75654, 75655, 75794, 75935, 75956, 76503, 76672, 77027, 77354, 77837, 78133, 78486, 78559, 78805, 78812, 78920, 79008, 79275, 79375, 79684, 79751, 80829, 80939, 81100, 81245, 81460, 82084, 82324, 82451, 82634, 82635, 82762, 82872, 83045",,70,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: jit bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #73571: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit; title: conv with padding='same' fails on lazy torchscript nvfuser | issue #73419: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit; title: test_jit_cuda_fuser fails on non-CUDA node for 1.11.0rc3 | issue #70240: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, Stale; title: JIT: wrong list/tuple length if using Union | issue #70223: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit, Stale; title: jit: Confusin...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2e83bd7c96c1ded088414300026cee6b86b9f7c42ab3ca875a1ae84b53e5e10a
+BUNDLE-1565,bundle:bundle-1565,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: oncall: jit (70 issues),issue_group,,oncall: jit needs triage batch 28,oncall: jit,Create one oncall: jit triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for oncall: jit paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"21064, 37883, 44951, 46375, 47336, 51376, 58109, 69006, 76013, 77167, 81337, 81635, 83349, 83585, 84049, 84135, 84187, 84189, 84304, 84588, 84615, 84628, 84646, 84673, 84681, 84685, 85072, 85342, 85505, 85513, 85514, 85568, 85570, 85573, 85585, 85588, 85706, 85804, 85805, 85813, 85893, 86110, 86112, 86116, 86124, 86276, 86287, 86351, 86455, 86552, 86553, 86598, 86816, 86818, 87289, 87390, 87487, 87781, 87787, 87792, 88491, 88765, 89065, 89076, 89483, 90181, 90301, 90305, 90369, 90466",,70,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: jit bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,issue #84673: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit; title: Autograd will take `init` module API into account when using `jit` | issue #84628: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit; title: INTERNAL ASSERT when the type of argument is not considered in JIT | issue #84615: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit; title: Serialize the warmed up torchscript module | issue #84588: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit; title: torch.jit....,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",595edb4ef74d43aae6549592c6a3dbc6924fe4529d405829c9652173c00e2dc2
+BUNDLE-1566,bundle:bundle-1566,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: oncall: jit (70 issues),issue_group,,oncall: jit needs triage batch 23,oncall: jit,Create one oncall: jit triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for oncall: jit paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"33491, 36910, 43520, 48082, 51969, 58789, 62221, 68921, 70058, 72498, 73142, 79875, 80007, 84340, 86662, 91098, 91229, 91358, 91360, 91396, 91504, 91562, 91686, 92230, 92375, 92548, 92558, 92563, 92654, 92674, 92740, 92742, 92866, 92888, 93255, 93826, 95194, 95497, 95789, 95858, 95960, 96098, 96420, 96735, 97343, 97913, 98064, 98210, 98888, 99821, 100636, 100730, 101055, 101855, 102653, 103250, 103788, 104041, 104450, 104458, 104712, 104732, 104906, 105196, 105900, 105917, 105918, 105997, 106435, 106699",,70,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: jit bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #92563: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit; title: [JIT] INTERNAL ASSERT FAILED when `Conv2d` and `clamp` used together | issue #92558: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit; title: [JIT][TracingCheckError] inplace ops incompatible with `contiguous(.., channels_last)` | issue #92548: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit; title: [JIT] Inconsistency in tensor shape between eager mode and JIT | issue #92375: needs tria...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",78b040ed24233f396054fef3b5fb90d073b945778fd50a552cd5f6687c5ea1bd
+BUNDLE-1567,bundle:bundle-1567,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: oncall: jit (70 issues),issue_group,,oncall: jit needs triage batch 18,oncall: jit,Create one oncall: jit triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for oncall: jit paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"14867, 40561, 41869, 41909, 42885, 43388, 48325, 49538, 52363, 54140, 55603, 58845, 60937, 62962, 66017, 66930, 67146, 68568, 69425, 70051, 75556, 75788, 76295, 82417, 87145, 89114, 89185, 89386, 90885, 93913, 97047, 98695, 103070, 105821, 107771, 108226, 108332, 108665, 108670, 108865, 109113, 109488, 109699, 111135, 111792, 111863, 112425, 113945, 114543, 115622, 115639, 115733, 115736, 115914, 116010, 116498, 116612, 117541, 118086, 118189, 118297, 118300, 118302, 118303, 118400, 118401, 119192, 120485, 122020, 123066",,70,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: jit bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #109699: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit; title: [TorchScript] Support ScriptFunction arguments in torch.jit.script calls. | issue #67146: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit; title: `torch.jit.is_scripting()` not set when scripting a Module | issue #109113: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit; title: The API ""torch::jit::_load_for_mobile"" is limited to create an object living on the stack. | issue #108865: ne...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",13c4ea4f1ef712d8d991d0d90a38e11986ff47ddbee5b54c5275f3e05ef71604
+BUNDLE-1568,bundle:bundle-1568,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: oncall: jit (69 issues),issue_group,,oncall: jit needs triage batch 13,oncall: jit,Create one oncall: jit triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for oncall: jit paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"6007, 6010, 8453, 8556, 11532, 13170, 13477, 14332, 14484, 15043, 16263, 18376, 18975, 40870, 42207, 48387, 51328, 58298, 59530, 66623, 67834, 67983, 76486, 76881, 80861, 82099, 89064, 93943, 104405, 123168, 123961, 124458, 125003, 125293, 125749, 126167, 126277, 126843, 127283, 127679, 128019, 128125, 128261, 128491, 128496, 128585, 129282, 129347, 130229, 130726, 130735, 131022, 132315, 132385, 133537, 133675, 133678, 133795, 133840, 133847, 134559, 134562, 134849, 134898, 134903, 134918, 135580, 136127, 136256",,69,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: jit bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,issue #67983: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit; title: torch.jit.export does not working | issue #127679: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit; title: RuntimeError: `jit.freeze` fails to find externally assigned attributes | issue #126843: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit; title: Torchscript export of `Salesforce/blip2-opt-2.7b` model fails with Conv shape error | issue #125293: needs triage; labels: oncall: jit; t...,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",067a32bddefa2ff3cd6ac6757d2321c2e5da1a5adec7597c3fc3fed823d11ca6
+BUNDLE-1569,bundle:bundle-1569,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: oncall: jit (15 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 6 issues - issue #16293: Unexpected behavior of jit.trace when PYTORCH_JIT=0,oncall: jit,Create one oncall: jit triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for oncall: jit paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"16293, 25066, 29092, 29177, 32976, 40914, 48108, 51835, 68559, 80561, 85792, 85877, 86804, 90366, 90367",,15,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: jit bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"s all us use PyTorch for research. It also does not help that JIT UX improvement issues are almost never worked on: #29092, #29177, #16293, #40914 Related to 2: #25066 Finally, I have two solution proposals. They may not be viable, but are nice from UX perspectives. To solve 1... | hat makes all us use PyTorch for research. It also does not help that JIT UX improvement issues are almost never worked on: #29092, #2...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",7b76df4daf0f861d7dec194be2c7eb5aa306e76222945c18d734b202f52a2043
+BUNDLE-1570,bundle:bundle-1570,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: oncall: jit (10 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #76578: [JIT][Autocast] Batchnorm folding pass during freezing doesn't preserve types,oncall: jit,Create one oncall: jit triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for oncall: jit paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"45465, 46749, 47964, 51018, 60333, 71470, 76578, 88448, 90365, 92073",,10,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: jit bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"expected (weight and bias can have different dtypes) ========================================= Original Context: Similar to conv-bn folding #76578, lin-bn folding #86706 with autocast freeze on gpu casts the inputs to linear to half, while inputs to batchnorm are not casted, r... | Same as #71470 ... definitely an issue, and looks like easy fix | dea on how well torch.nn.ModuleList is supported in TorchScript? I h...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",281ec96a5fb36e261b2d614111eb4e41559ae74f4fa3fb58eefce0544d9e2f68
+BUNDLE-1571,bundle:bundle-1571,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: oncall: jit (10 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #44768: [JIT] function decorated with @torch.no_grad() can not be exported when another function is called inside it.,oncall: jit,Create one oncall: jit triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for oncall: jit paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"11967, 44768, 45208, 52312, 63145, 75002, 124461, 131452, 137252, 143258",,10,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: jit bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"Using torch.no_grad is only supported in with statements, not as a decorator. There is an open issue I am working on (#44768) to fail better if it is used as a decorator. Can you use a with statement for whatever it is you're trying to do? | ality). Of course that is pretty bad, because we are forced to lie to the type checker, sweeping bugs under the carpet. Possibly related to #75002 cc @EikanWang @jgong5 @wenzh...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",c92a13add7b600c1b17296684cb9d93228ee034829e0676ce22911c7faf3d3d5
+BUNDLE-1572,bundle:bundle-1572,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: oncall: jit (2 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #106128: Torchscript optimizer incorrectly applies constant propagation to convert prim::ListConstruct() into prim::Constant,oncall: jit,Create one oncall: jit triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for oncall: jit paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"106128, 106129",,2,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: jit bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"merous issues with torchscipt optimization and have had to disabled it to avoid breaking the code. I recently debugged one such issue here: #106128 torch::jit::setGraphExecutorOptimize sets a thread-local variable, but the model may be run on a different thread. This was diffi...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f23328b5b8f93d806589adac411e2a5eb48a586f7cb79e72d7ac3325b6d9a89f
+BUNDLE-1573,bundle:bundle-1573,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: oncall: mobile (70 issues),issue_group,,oncall: mobile needs triage batch 1,oncall: mobile,Create one oncall: mobile triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for oncall: mobile paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"32901, 34682, 36182, 37016, 38312, 39240, 39724, 42039, 42308, 43488, 44469, 44630, 45398, 46979, 46995, 47177, 47342, 48410, 48703, 49782, 50714, 50943, 52144, 53264, 55779, 55782, 56007, 57887, 57893, 61765, 63476, 65490, 65662, 67599, 67603, 68536, 68984, 68987, 69347, 69354, 69609, 70159, 72252, 74272, 75308, 75864, 76029, 76807, 77840, 80142, 80321, 81552, 81651, 82312, 83161, 83250, 86572, 91387, 96639, 109579, 110379, 114102, 114283, 116795, 118069, 120976, 127013, 129633, 143565, 186670",,70,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: mobile bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #186670: needs triage; labels: oncall: mobile, bot-triaged; title: _load_mobile_module_from_bytes SIGSEGVs on malformed flatbuffer model (unchecked Function.class_type index) | issue #63476: needs triage; labels: oncall: mobile; title: Error loading Pytorch lite model in Android | issue #81552: needs triage; labels: oncall: mobile; title: Support Swift Package Manager (SPM) for iOS | issue #143565: needs tri...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",2da5f5b9d3bebbeeb7a6d6c6489e69cf394570e1badd2f0ee013dc0f71ad7015
+BUNDLE-1574,bundle:bundle-1574,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: oncall: mobile (3 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #50533: Non-avairable nightly version for converting models to NNAPI,oncall: mobile,Create one oncall: mobile triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for oncall: mobile paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"33124, 50533, 50678",,3,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: mobile bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,This is the same issue as #50533 | issue #33124: needs triage; labels: oncall: mobile; title: QNNPACK: GNU aarch64 assembler does not support 4s on neon mov,True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",50cc2705abd0a3010d16ddc8796147809fb3133a34a14aac10faf4550f3a6040
+BUNDLE-1575,bundle:bundle-1575,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: oncall: package/deploy (20 issues),issue_group,,oncall: package/deploy needs triage batch 1,oncall: package/deploy,Create one oncall: package/deploy triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for oncall: package/deploy paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"60089, 60189, 64462, 65305, 72659, 74909, 74956, 74964, 75467, 76682, 76683, 76685, 78172, 83143, 88735, 138341, 139297, 152532, 155321, 180307",,20,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: package/deploy bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #152532: needs triage; labels: oncall: package/deploy; title: The 2.7.0 release tarball is missing `.ci/docker/ci_commit_pins/nccl-cu12.txt` required for building | issue #180307: needs triage; labels: oncall: package/deploy, bot-triaged; title: PackageImporter.load_pickle() race can silently deserialize the wrong tensor across concurrent loads | issue #155321: needs triage; labels: oncall: package/deploy; t...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",3f6e02632064aa3d52bcdcc2530e26c2f4bfdb9c45265a7da9254845ecc1abac
+BUNDLE-1576,bundle:bundle-1576,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: oncall: profiler (53 issues),issue_group,,Review thread: 2 issues - issue #121219: Torch profiler corrupted names with Python 3.11,oncall: profiler,Create one oncall: profiler triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for oncall: profiler paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"64345, 69506, 69782, 70951, 74605, 76309, 82951, 83769, 91311, 91903, 98124, 121219, 121471, 124674, 125272, 126703, 127215, 128292, 132738, 133444, 135003, 138193, 140684, 144613, 144778, 147604, 147722, 151969, 152617, 153614, 153901, 153949, 157728, 159256, 162481, 164145, 166121, 166311, 167605, 169666, 170319, 170774, 170867, 174273, 174555, 175790, 176288, 178087, 181238, 183842, 186026, 188481, 188490",,53,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: profiler bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"mes. However, there seems to be a discrepancy between Python 3.10 and Python 3.11 and how imports are handled. I believe this is related to #64345 and #113564. The following snippet produces good trace files with Python 3.10, but occasionally produces corrupted output on Pytho... | issue #181238: needs triage; labels: oncall: profiler, bot-triaged; title: torch.cuda.synchronize() syncs on device 0 when current dev...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",dc57b45d2733ef18accb1acfc3cd37c2bb0bb9231dd57dd579da66d885d5acb1
+BUNDLE-1577,bundle:bundle-1577,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: oncall: quantization (54 issues),issue_group,,oncall: quantization needs triage batch 1,oncall: quantization,Create one oncall: quantization triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for oncall: quantization paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"115985, 116250, 116251, 116252, 116253, 116865, 116992, 117102, 117229, 117239, 117920, 118165, 120705, 121230, 122183, 122224, 122303, 123824, 125004, 125564, 126140, 126266, 126974, 127076, 128114, 131055, 132029, 133552, 133557, 134220, 136094, 136828, 138820, 139464, 143289, 147112, 147818, 148171, 149500, 152813, 153358, 154323, 159505, 165829, 170169, 171675, 172082, 173075, 179109, 179111, 180995, 181181, 186363, 187048",,54,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: quantization bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #187048: needs triage; labels: oncall: quantization, bot-triaged; title: [Bug][Quantization] Inconsistent numerical behavior in _choose_qparams_per_tensor and redundant code in test_quantized_tensor.py | issue #186363: needs triage; labels: oncall: quantization, bot-triaged; title: test_quantization.py int8 tests fail on AArch64 | issue #180995: needs triage; labels: oncall: quantization, bot-triaged; title:...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",f29980fe25a892b2c3ccd448046e0411f2317631ff51e18dfe98febb59faf49a
+BUNDLE-1578,bundle:bundle-1578,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: oncall: releng (1 issue),issue_group,,#160005 [BE][download.pytorch.org] Index fix user navigation,oncall: releng,Create one oncall: releng triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for oncall: releng paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,160005,,1,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: releng bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #160005: needs triage; labels: oncall: releng, better-engineering; title: [BE][download.pytorch.org] Index fix user navigation",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",89753fbfca31dcbe3fdd95cc917230d564770541c60091d518555d8d85208a92
+BUNDLE-1579,bundle:bundle-1579,triage_to_fix_package,Triage-to-fix package,patch-plan bundle,Triage-to-fix package: oncall: visualization (22 issues),issue_group,,oncall: visualization needs triage batch 1,oncall: visualization,Create one oncall: visualization triage-to-fix branch after confirming the common failure shape.,Moves triage from issue comments into a concrete branch/test hypothesis.,Run focused tests for oncall: visualization paths plus one regression test per resolved issue cluster.,covered_by_local_packet,"30863, 31603, 39250, 43323, 43328, 47265, 49823, 51445, 56010, 57163, 65449, 65588, 68927, 68940, 72906, 75673, 80863, 83589, 90374, 93350, 174375, 184078",,22,0,patch_plan_candidate,This oncall: visualization bundle is concrete enough for a local patch-plan bundle.,"Draft locally against torch/, test/, .ci/, add focused regression coverage, and only open a GitHub PR if maintainers approve the scope.",medium,"issue #184078: needs triage; labels: oncall: visualization, bot-triaged; title: add_params metric_dict values not shown in tensorboard hparams tab | issue #174375: needs triage; labels: oncall: visualization, bot-triaged; title: [CUDA] flamegraph.pl download fails on cross-device filesystems | issue #90374: needs triage; labels: oncall: visualization; title: torch.utils.tensorboard import fails if a new protobuf >...",True,False,"comment, issue, pull_request, label, close, merge, submit, publish, upload",cf0da24e2e7d967b56ed5e8e8ad58928b9de7ad241cf7eabdb311a3d8d866a7d