Spaces:
Sleeping
Sleeping
| # **Additional Competition Context β MedGemma Impact Challenge** | |
| *Compiled 2026-02-12 from systematic review of Kaggle competition pages, discussions, rules, and HAI-DEF developer documentation.* | |
| ### **Key NEW findings not in Clarke spec:** | |
| 1. **Submission is a Kaggle Writeup (not a file upload)** β created via the Writeups tab, with a Submit button. One submission per team, can re-submit. | |
| 2. **3 pages \= \~1,500 words** (host clarification). With images, aim for 1,000-1,200 words. | |
| 3. **12 named judges** β all Google Research/Health AI staff. Profiles documented. | |
| 4. **Judged as DEMO, not production** β Yun Liu explicitly said regulatory pathway is NOT the focus. Focus is technical demonstration. | |
| 5. **Non-commercial training data is OK** β Daniel Golden confirmed. Model weights release is BONUS not required. | |
| 6. **MedGemma 4B has known instruction-following bugs** β leaks system prompts, generates meta-commentary. Risk for Clarke's EHR pipeline. | |
| 7. **MedGemma 27B deployment is very hard** β needs \~54GB VRAM, Vertex AI A100 quotas being rejected. Unsloth GGUF quantizations available via Ollama (Q8\_0 \= 31.8GB). | |
| 8. **MedGemma 1.5 4B adds EHR understanding** β directly relevant to Clarke. Should use 1.5 not 1.0. | |
| 9. **MedASR runs in-browser via ONNX/WebGPU** β someone built it, could strengthen Edge AI track claim. | |
| 10. **Only 129 submissions from 5,855 entrants** β competitive field may be smaller than expected. | |
| 11. **Google explicitly suggests agentic orchestration** in their MedGemma docs β validates Clarke's architecture. | |
| --- | |
| ## **1\. Submission Requirements** | |
| ### **Submission Format: Kaggle Writeup (NOT a file upload)** | |
| * Your submission is a **Kaggle Writeup** attached to the competition's Writeups page β not a PDF or file upload. Create via the "New Writeup" button at: [https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/med-gemma-impact-challenge/writeups](https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/med-gemma-impact-challenge/writeups) | |
| * After saving your Writeup, click the **"Submit"** button in the top right corner. | |
| * Each team gets **one (1) Writeup submission only**, but it can be un-submitted, edited, and re-submitted unlimited times before the deadline. | |
| * **Source:** [https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/med-gemma-impact-challenge/overview](https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/med-gemma-impact-challenge/overview) (Submission Instructions section) | |
| ### **3-Page Limit Clarification** | |
| * The "3 pages" translates to **\~1,500 words** single-spaced. If using charts/images/code blocks, aim for **1,000β1,200 words** of text. | |
| * **Source:** Fereshteh Mahvar (Competition Host) at [https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/med-gemma-impact-challenge/discussion/671156](https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/med-gemma-impact-challenge/discussion/671156) | |
| ### **Required Links in Writeup** | |
| * **Required:** Video (3 min or less) | |
| * **Required:** Public code repository | |
| * **Bonus:** Public interactive live demo app | |
| * **Bonus:** Open-weight Hugging Face model tracing to a HAI-DEF model | |
| * **Source:** [https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/med-gemma-impact-challenge/overview](https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/med-gemma-impact-challenge/overview) (Submission Instructions) | |
| ### **Track Selection** | |
| * All submissions automatically compete in the **Main Track**. | |
| * You may select **one** special award prize (Agentic Workflow, Novel Task, or Edge AI). | |
| * If you select multiple special awards, only one will be considered (randomly selected). | |
| * **Source:** [https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/med-gemma-impact-challenge/overview](https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/med-gemma-impact-challenge/overview) (Choosing a Track) | |
| ### **Writeup Template (exact structure required)** | |
| \#\#\# Project name | |
| \#\#\# Your team \[Name members, speciality, role\] | |
| \#\#\# Problem statement \[Problem domain \+ Impact potential criteria\] | |
| \#\#\# Overall solution \[Effective use of HAI-DEF models criterion\] | |
| \#\#\# Technical details \[Product feasibility criterion\] | |
| * **Source:** [https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/med-gemma-impact-challenge/overview](https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/med-gemma-impact-challenge/overview) (Proposed Writeup template) | |
| ### **Private Resources Warning** | |
| * If you attach a **private** Kaggle Resource to your public Writeup, it will be **automatically made public** after the deadline. | |
| * **Source:** [https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/med-gemma-impact-challenge/overview](https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/med-gemma-impact-challenge/overview) | |
| ### **Submissions Must Be in English** | |
| * Confirmed by MarΓa Cruz (Kaggle Staff). | |
| * **Source:** [https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/med-gemma-impact-challenge/discussion/667660](https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/med-gemma-impact-challenge/discussion/667660) | |
| --- | |
| ## **2\. Judging Details** | |
| ### **Full Judge Panel (12 judges)** | |
| | Judge | Role | | |
| | ----- | ----- | | |
| | Fereshteh Mahvar | Staff Medical Software Engineer & Solutions Architect, Google Health AI | | |
| | Omar Sanseviero | Developer Experience Lead, Google DeepMind | | |
| | Glenn Cameron | Sr. PMM, Google | | |
| | Can "John" Kirmizi | Software Engineer, Google Research | | |
| | Andrew Sellergren | Software Engineer, Google Research | | |
| | Dave Steiner | Clinical Research Scientist, Google | | |
| | Sunny Virmani | Group Product Manager, Google Research | | |
| | Liron Yatziv | Research Engineer, Google Research | | |
| | Daniel Golden | Engineering Manager, Google Research | | |
| | Yun Liu | Research Scientist, Google Research | | |
| | Rebecca Hemenway | Health AI Strategic Partnerships, Google Research | | |
| | Fayaz Jamil | Technical Program Manager, Google Research | | |
| **Source:** [https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/med-gemma-impact-challenge/overview](https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/med-gemma-impact-challenge/overview) (Judges section) | |
| ### **Evaluation is Through Demonstration Application Lens** | |
| * Judges evaluate through the lens of a **demonstration application, NOT a finished product**. | |
| * Regulatory pathway, HIPAA/GDPR compliance, etc. are **not the focus** of evaluation criteria β though you may include them. | |
| * Quote from Yun Liu (Competition Host): *"The focus of the evaluation criteria is the technical aspects of the demonstration application. Each evaluation criteria will be judged through the lens of a demonstration application and not a finished product."* | |
| * **Source:** [https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/med-gemma-impact-challenge/discussion/668280](https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/med-gemma-impact-challenge/discussion/668280) | |
| ### **Execution & Communication is the Highest-Weighted Category (30%)** | |
| * Judges look for a **"cohesive and compelling narrative across all submitted materials"** that articulates how you meet the rest of the criteria. | |
| * Assess: clarity/polish/effectiveness of video demo, completeness/readability of writeup, quality of source code (organization, comments, reusability). | |
| * **Source:** [https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/med-gemma-impact-challenge/overview](https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/med-gemma-impact-challenge/overview) (Evaluation Criteria table) | |
| --- | |
| ## **3\. Rules & Restrictions** | |
| ### **Team Size** | |
| * Maximum **5 members** per team. | |
| * Team mergers allowed before Team Merger Deadline. | |
| * **Source:** [https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/med-gemma-impact-challenge/rules](https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/med-gemma-impact-challenge/rules) (Section 2.1) | |
| ### **One Submission Per Team** | |
| * For Hackathons, each team is allowed **one (1) Submission**. | |
| * **Source:** [https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/med-gemma-impact-challenge/rules](https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/med-gemma-impact-challenge/rules) (Section 2.2) | |
| ### **Winner License: CC BY 4.0** | |
| * Winning submissions must be licensed under **CC BY 4.0** (code and demos). | |
| * For generally commercially available software you used but don't own, you don't need to grant that license. | |
| * For input data or pretrained models with incompatible licenses used to generate your winning solution, you **don't need to grant** open source license for that data/model. | |
| * **Source:** [https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/med-gemma-impact-challenge/rules](https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/med-gemma-impact-challenge/rules) (Section 2.5) | |
| ### **Non-Commercial Data is Allowed for Training** | |
| * Using public, research-only / non-commercial external datasets during development is **permitted**. | |
| * Participation in a Kaggle challenge is **not considered commercial use**. | |
| * Releasing final model weights is a **bonus, not a requirement**. | |
| * Daniel Golden (Competition Host) quote: *"You are permitted to use data and other code sources during development that are governed under other, potentially more restrictive licenses."* | |
| * **Source:** [https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/med-gemma-impact-challenge/discussion/671596](https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/med-gemma-impact-challenge/discussion/671596) | |
| ### **External Data & Tools** | |
| * External data allowed if **publicly available and equally accessible** to all participants at no cost, or meets the "Reasonableness Standard". | |
| * Use of HAI-DEF and MedGemma subject to **HAI-DEF Terms of Use**: [https://developers.google.com/health-ai-developer-foundations/terms](https://developers.google.com/health-ai-developer-foundations/terms) | |
| * Automated ML tools (AutoML, H2O, etc.) are permitted with appropriate licensing. | |
| * **Source:** [https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/med-gemma-impact-challenge/rules](https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/med-gemma-impact-challenge/rules) (Section 2.6) | |
| ### **HAI-DEF Terms Key Restrictions** | |
| * **"Clinical Use"** (diagnosis/treatment of patients) requires Health Regulatory Authorization β this doesn't apply to a demo/competition context. | |
| * HAI-DEF source code licensed under **Apache 2.0**. | |
| * Models are free for research and commercial use. | |
| * **Source:** [https://developers.google.com/health-ai-developer-foundations/terms](https://developers.google.com/health-ai-developer-foundations/terms) | |
| ### **Mandatory HAI-DEF Model Usage** | |
| * Use of **at least one HAI-DEF model** (such as MedGemma) is **mandatory**. | |
| * **Source:** [https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/med-gemma-impact-challenge/overview](https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/med-gemma-impact-challenge/overview) (Effective use of HAI-DEF models criterion) | |
| ### **Eligibility** | |
| * Must be 18+, registered on Kaggle, not resident of sanctioned countries. | |
| * Competition Entities (Google, Kaggle employees) can participate but **cannot win prizes**. | |
| * **Source:** [https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/med-gemma-impact-challenge/rules](https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/med-gemma-impact-challenge/rules) (Section 2.7, 3.1) | |
| ### **Winner's Obligations** | |
| * Deliver final model's software code \+ documentation. | |
| * Code must be capable of generating the winning submission. | |
| * Must describe resources required to build/run. | |
| * For hackathons, deliverables are as described on the competition website (may not be software code). | |
| * **Source:** [https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/med-gemma-impact-challenge/rules](https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/med-gemma-impact-challenge/rules) (Section 2.8) | |
| ### **No Cloud Credits Provided** | |
| * Multiple competitors asked about GCP credits / Colab compute β no response from organizers confirming any credits. | |
| * **Source:** [https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/med-gemma-impact-challenge/discussion/667660](https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/med-gemma-impact-challenge/discussion/667660) | |
| --- | |
| ## **4\. Winning Patterns & Insights from Discussions** | |
| ### **Focus on Demonstration, Not Production** | |
| * The organizers repeatedly emphasize this is about **demonstration applications** with impact potential, not production-ready systems. Keep the writeup high-level; use the video to convey concepts. | |
| * *"Less is more\! You should take advantage of the video to convey most of the concepts and keep the write-up as high level as possible."* | |
| * **Source:** [https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/med-gemma-impact-challenge/overview](https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/med-gemma-impact-challenge/overview) (Submission Instructions) | |
| ### **Storytelling is Explicitly Scored** | |
| * Problem Domain criterion explicitly mentions **"storytelling"** alongside clarity of problem definition. | |
| * **Source:** [https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/med-gemma-impact-challenge/overview](https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/med-gemma-impact-challenge/overview) (Evaluation Criteria) | |
| ### **Use HAI-DEF Models "to Their Fullest Potential"** | |
| * The criterion asks whether your application uses HAI-DEF models *"to their fullest potential, where other solutions would likely be less effective"*. | |
| * Clarke's multi-model approach (MedASR \+ MedGemma 4B \+ MedGemma 27B) is well-aligned with this. | |
| * **Source:** [https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/med-gemma-impact-challenge/overview](https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/med-gemma-impact-challenge/overview) (Evaluation Criteria) | |
| ### **Agentic Orchestration is Officially Suggested** | |
| * Google's own MedGemma documentation explicitly suggests agentic orchestration: using MedGemma as a tool within an agentic system, coupled with FHIR generators/interpreters, Gemini Live for bidirectional audio, or Gemini 2.5 Pro for function calling. | |
| * MedGemma can **"parse private health data locally before sending anonymized requests to centralized models"** β directly supports Clarke's privacy-preserving architecture. | |
| * **Source:** [https://developers.google.com/health-ai-developer-foundations/medgemma](https://developers.google.com/health-ai-developer-foundations/medgemma) | |
| ### **Competition Scale: Low Submissions So Far** | |
| * 5,855 entrants but only **129 submissions** (134 participants, 129 teams) as of Feb 12 2026\. | |
| * This suggests many entrants haven't submitted yet β the field may be smaller than expected. | |
| * **Source:** [https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/med-gemma-impact-challenge/overview](https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/med-gemma-impact-challenge/overview) (Participation stats) | |
| ### **MedGemma 1.5 is the Latest Version** | |
| * MedGemma 1.5 4B (google/medgemma-1.5-4b-it) was released in Jan 2026 with improved capabilities: | |
| * High-dimensional medical imaging (CT, MRI, histopathology) | |
| * Longitudinal medical imaging (chest X-ray time series) | |
| * Medical document understanding (structured extraction from lab reports) | |
| * EHR understanding (interpretation of text-based EHR data) | |
| * Improved medical text reasoning accuracy | |
| * **Source:** [https://research.google/blog/next-generation-medical-image-interpretation-with-medgemma-15-and-medical-speech-to-text-with-medasr/](https://research.google/blog/next-generation-medical-image-interpretation-with-medgemma-15-and-medical-speech-to-text-with-medasr/) | |
| --- | |
| ## **5\. Technical Resources** | |
| ### **Official Notebooks & Code** | |
| | Resource | URL | | |
| | ----- | ----- | | |
| | Quick start (Hugging Face) | [https://github.com/google-health/medgemma/blob/main/notebooks/quick\_start\_with\_hugging\_face.ipynb](https://github.com/google-health/medgemma/blob/main/notebooks/quick_start_with_hugging_face.ipynb) | | |
| | Quick start (Model Garden) | [https://github.com/google-health/medgemma/blob/main/notebooks/quick\_start\_with\_model\_garden.ipynb](https://github.com/google-health/medgemma/blob/main/notebooks/quick_start_with_model_garden.ipynb) | | |
| | Fine-tuning with LoRA | [https://github.com/google-health/medgemma/blob/main/notebooks/fine\_tune\_with\_hugging\_face.ipynb](https://github.com/google-health/medgemma/blob/main/notebooks/fine_tune_with_hugging_face.ipynb) | | |
| | Reinforcement Learning | [https://github.com/Google-Health/medgemma/blob/main/notebooks/reinforcement\_learning\_with\_hugging\_face.ipynb](https://github.com/Google-Health/medgemma/blob/main/notebooks/reinforcement_learning_with_hugging_face.ipynb) | | |
| | MedGemma GitHub repo | [https://github.com/google-health/medgemma](https://github.com/google-health/medgemma) | | |
| | HAI-DEF developer forum | [https://discuss.ai.google.dev/c/hai-def/](https://discuss.ai.google.dev/c/hai-def/) | | |
| ### **MedASR Resources** | |
| | Resource | URL | | |
| | ----- | ----- | | |
| | MedASR model (HuggingFace) | [https://huggingface.co/google/medasr](https://huggingface.co/google/medasr) | | |
| | MedASR developer docs | [https://developers.google.com/health-ai-developer-foundations/medasr/](https://developers.google.com/health-ai-developer-foundations/medasr/) | | |
| | MedASR in-browser (ONNX/WebGPU) | [https://medasr.ainergiz.com/](https://medasr.ainergiz.com/) | | |
| | MedASR in-browser source | [https://github.com/ainergiz/medasr-web](https://github.com/ainergiz/medasr-web) | | |
| | MedASR MLX (Apple Silicon) | Discussion: [https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/med-gemma-impact-challenge/discussion/672879](https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/med-gemma-impact-challenge/discussion/672879) | | |
| | MedASR ONNX export script | In ainergiz/medasr-web repo at /scripts/export\_onnx.py | | |
| ### **MedGemma 27B GGUF Quantizations (Unsloth)** | |
| * Available at: [https://huggingface.co/unsloth/medgemma-27b-it-GGUF/tree/main](https://huggingface.co/unsloth/medgemma-27b-it-GGUF/tree/main) | |
| * Can run locally via Ollama: ollama run hf.co/unsloth/medgemma-27b-it-GGUF:Q8\_0 (31.8 GB) | |
| * **Source:** [https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/med-gemma-impact-challenge/discussion/673091](https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/med-gemma-impact-challenge/discussion/673091) | |
| ### **HuggingFace Collections** | |
| | Collection | URL | | |
| | ----- | ----- | | |
| | MedGemma release | [https://huggingface.co/collections/google/medgemma-release-680aade845f90bec6a3f60c4](https://huggingface.co/collections/google/medgemma-release-680aade845f90bec6a3f60c4) | | |
| | HAI-DEF collection | [https://huggingface.co/collections/google/health-ai-developer-foundations-hai-def](https://huggingface.co/collections/google/health-ai-developer-foundations-hai-def) | | |
| | Community fine-tunes | [https://huggingface.co/models?other=or:base\_model:finetune:google/medgemma-4b-it,base\_model:finetune:google/medgemma-4b-pt,base\_model:finetune:google/medgemma-27b-it,base\_model:finetune:google/medgemma-27b-text-it](https://huggingface.co/models?other=or:base_model:finetune:google/medgemma-4b-it,base_model:finetune:google/medgemma-4b-pt,base_model:finetune:google/medgemma-27b-it,base_model:finetune:google/medgemma-27b-text-it) | | |
| ### **Key Blog Posts** | |
| | Title | URL | | |
| | ----- | ----- | | |
| | MedGemma 1.5 \+ MedASR announcement | [https://research.google/blog/next-generation-medical-image-interpretation-with-medgemma-15-and-medical-speech-to-text-with-medasr/](https://research.google/blog/next-generation-medical-image-interpretation-with-medgemma-15-and-medical-speech-to-text-with-medasr/) | | |
| | Original MedGemma blog | [https://research.google/blog/medgemma-our-most-capable-open-models-for-health-ai-development/](https://research.google/blog/medgemma-our-most-capable-open-models-for-health-ai-development/) | | |
| | HAI-DEF launch blog | [https://research.google/blog/helping-everyone-build-ai-for-healthcare-applications-with-open-foundation-models/](https://research.google/blog/helping-everyone-build-ai-for-healthcare-applications-with-open-foundation-models/) | | |
| | AskCPG concept integration | [https://discuss.ai.google.dev/t/sharing-our-product-integration-with-medgemma-askcpg/94556](https://discuss.ai.google.dev/t/sharing-our-product-integration-with-medgemma-askcpg/94556) | | |
| ### **Notable Competition Notebooks (for inspiration)** | |
| | Notebook | Theme | | |
| | ----- | ----- | | |
| | MedFlow AI (24 upvotes) | Top-voted notebook | | |
| | MedGemma Navigator: DICOMweb β FHIR (16 upvotes) | FHIR/DICOM integration β similar to Clarke's EHR focus | | |
| | MedGemma Medical AI Chatbot \+ 5 Test Scenarios (14 upvotes) | Medical chatbot with test scenarios | | |
| | MedAssist Edge Offline Medical AI (7 upvotes) | Offline/edge deployment | | |
| | Spasht AI β Bridging India's "Last Mile" Health Gap (6 upvotes) | Community health focus | | |
| | RadAssist-MedGemma: AI Radiology Triage Assistant (4 upvotes) | Radiology triage | | |
| | CRSA β Clinical Reasoning Stability Auditor | Reasoning evaluation | | |
| **Source:** [https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/med-gemma-impact-challenge/code](https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/med-gemma-impact-challenge/code) | |
| --- | |
| ## **6\. Gaps & Risks** | |
| ### **MedGemma 4B Instruction Following Issues** | |
| * Multiple competitors report MedGemma 4B (medgemma-1.5-4b-it) **leaking system prompts, generating meta-commentary, and outputting chain-of-thought training artifacts** (critique responses, constraint checklists, special tokens). | |
| * One user reports running with Ollama locally works well; the issues may be prompt/framework dependent. | |
| * **Risk for Clarke:** If using MedGemma 4B for EHR extraction, we need thorough prompt engineering and output parsing to handle instruction-following failures. | |
| * **Source:** [https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/med-gemma-impact-challenge/discussion/673091](https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/med-gemma-impact-challenge/discussion/673091) | |
| ### **MedGemma 27B Deployment is Extremely Challenging** | |
| * Requires \~54GB VRAM β won't run on Apple M3 Max 64GB (MPS buffer limit), won't fit on 2x L4 GPUs (48GB). | |
| * Vertex AI A100 quota requests being **rejected by Google**. | |
| * Quantized GGUF versions (Unsloth Q8\_0 \= 31.8GB) can run via Ollama on local hardware. | |
| * **Risk for Clarke:** The 24-hour build plan assumes MedGemma 27B for letter generation. If deploying on Kaggle/cloud is blocked by GPU quota, we need a fallback (quantized 27B via Ollama, or enhanced 4B with heavy prompt engineering). | |
| * **Source:** [https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/med-gemma-impact-challenge/discussion/673091](https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/med-gemma-impact-challenge/discussion/673091) | |
| ### **MedGemma 1.5 Only Available as 4B** | |
| * MedGemma 1.5 is only released as 4B multimodal. The 27B model is still MedGemma 1 (text-only and multimodal). | |
| * **Risk for Clarke:** Clarke spec references "MedGemma 27B" β should clarify we're using MedGemma 1 27B, not 1.5. | |
| * **Source:** [https://developers.google.com/health-ai-developer-foundations/medgemma](https://developers.google.com/health-ai-developer-foundations/medgemma) | |
| ### **No Provided Dataset \= You Must Source Your Own** | |
| * Competition provides **zero data**. All data must be sourced externally. | |
| * For Clarke: synthetic NHS consultation data or publicly available clinical note datasets needed. Non-commercial academic datasets are acceptable per organizer clarification. | |
| * **Source:** [https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/med-gemma-impact-challenge/rules](https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/med-gemma-impact-challenge/rules) (Section 2.4) | |
| ### **Model Weights Release is Bonus, Not Required** | |
| * Releasing fine-tuned model weights on HuggingFace is listed as a **bonus** submission element, not mandatory. | |
| * However, it could significantly strengthen the "Effective use of HAI-DEF models" score. | |
| * **Source:** [https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/med-gemma-impact-challenge/discussion/671596](https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/med-gemma-impact-challenge/discussion/671596) (Daniel Golden's response) | |
| ### **EHR/FHIR Understanding is a New MedGemma 1.5 Capability** | |
| * MedGemma 1.5 4B specifically adds **"EHR understanding for the interpretation of text-based EHR data"** β this directly supports Clarke's EHR navigation component. | |
| * Consider using MedGemma 1.5 4B (instead of 1.0 4B) for the EHR extraction pipeline. | |
| * **Source:** [https://research.google/blog/next-generation-medical-image-interpretation-with-medgemma-15-and-medical-speech-to-text-with-medasr/](https://research.google/blog/next-generation-medical-image-interpretation-with-medgemma-15-and-medical-speech-to-text-with-medasr/) | |
| ### **Official Discord Exists But Not Monitored by Staff** | |
| * Kaggle Discord at [http://discord.gg/kaggle](http://discord.gg/kaggle) β additional discussion channel, but organizers don't monitor it. | |
| * **Source:** [https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/med-gemma-impact-challenge/discussion/667660](https://www.kaggle.com/competitions/med-gemma-impact-challenge/discussion/667660) | |
| --- | |
| ## **Pages That Could Not Be Accessed** | |
| | URL | Issue | | |
| | ----- | ----- | | |
| | Kaggle discussion threads via web\_fetch | JS-rendered, required browser automation | | |
| | Kaggle Code notebooks (content) | Would require login/browser to read notebook code cells | | |
| | AskCPG concept app details | [https://discuss.ai.google.dev/t/sharing-our-product-integration-with-medgemma-askcpg/94556](https://discuss.ai.google.dev/t/sharing-our-product-integration-with-medgemma-askcpg/94556) β not fetched | | |
| | MedGemma model card | [https://developers.google.com/health-ai-developer-foundations/medgemma/model-card](https://developers.google.com/health-ai-developer-foundations/medgemma/model-card) β not fetched | | |
| | MedASR developer docs | [https://developers.google.com/health-ai-developer-foundations/medasr/](https://developers.google.com/health-ai-developer-foundations/medasr/) β not fetched | | |
| | HAI-DEF Terms of Use (full) | [https://developers.google.com/health-ai-developer-foundations/terms](https://developers.google.com/health-ai-developer-foundations/terms) β truncated at Section 3 | | |