pp sucks

#14
by gopi87 - opened

i ahve b and ub at 6500 but i am getting 130 t/sec lol on pp and ts i am gett 7tps in latest llama.cpp in ik_llama.cpp its not even loading the ub and b what the fuck is going on this deep seek v4 flash arch shit

skill issue

skill issue

if you can why don't you help us

echo 0 | sudo tee /proc/sys/kernel/numa_balancing
GGML_CUDA_NO_PINNED=1 CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES=2,3,0,1
numactl --interleave=all
~/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server
--model /mnt/nvme/deepseek/DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-Q8_K_XL-00001-of-00005.gguf
--tensor-split 0.9,1.3,0.5,0.4
--reasoning on
--numa distribute
--no-mmap
--reasoning on
--n-cpu-moe 55
--ctx-size 150000
--batch-size 6500
--ubatch-size 6500
--parallel 1
--threads 45
--threads-batch 45
-ngl 100
--host 127.0.0.1
--port 8082
--jinja

this is what i am running

echo 0 | sudo tee /proc/sys/kernel/numa_balancing
GGML_CUDA_NO_PINNED=1 CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES=2,3,0,1
numactl --interleave=all
~/llama.cpp/build/bin/llama-server
--model /mnt/nvme/deepseek/DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731-UD-Q8_K_XL-00001-of-00005.gguf
--tensor-split 1.1,1.3,0,0.3
--override-tensor "blk.0.ffn_(up|down|gate)exps.weight=CUDA2,blk.1.ffn(up|down|gate)exps.weight=CUDA2,blk.2.ffn(down)_exps.weight=CUDA3"
--reasoning on
--numa distribute
--no-mmap
--n-cpu-moe 999
--flash-attn on
--kv-unified
--spec-type draft-dspark
--spec-draft-n-max 1
--ctx-size 280000
--batch-size 4000
--ubatch-size 4000
--verbose
--parallel 1
--threads 45
--threads-batch 45
-ngl 100
--host 127.0.0.1
--port 8082
--jinja

nothinking is improved this approches either

It's an issue of not being optimized for this new architecture. See here https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1vdm4z8/comment/p1aaigq/

It's an issue of not being optimized for this new architecture. See here https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1vdm4z8/comment/p1aaigq/

i tested the build there build and solution also is not solved the pp issues its just stuck at 145 t/sec even though i sent it araound ub and b at 7300 values its just sucks

It's only faster if you have the full model in VRAM. In mainline I was getting 400-600 pp, with the fork I am getting 1300 pp.

It's an issue of not being optimized for this new architecture. See here https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1vdm4z8/comment/p1aaigq/

i tested the build there build and solution also is not solved the pp issues its just stuck at 145 t/sec even though i sent it araound ub and b at 7300 values its just sucks

It's only faster if you have the full model in VRAM. In mainline I was getting 400-600 pp, with the fork I am getting 1300 pp.

It's only faster if you have the full model in VRAM. In mainline I was getting 400-600 pp, with the fork I am getting 1300 pp.

It's an issue of not being optimized for this new architecture. See here https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1vdm4z8/comment/p1aaigq/

i tested the build there build and solution also is not solved the pp issues its just stuck at 145 t/sec even though i sent it araound ub and b at 7300 values its just sucks

It's only faster if you have the full model in VRAM. In mainline I was getting 400-600 pp, with the fork I am getting 1300 pp.

ohh is the implementation for cpu+gpu moe types are still going btw with full vram 600 pf is not greate though

Sign up or log in to comment